Аннотация: Toward the Moon. A state official. And an intermediary broker. A diary note.
Toward the Moon. A state official. And an intermediary broker. A diary note.
The answer dated December 23, 2021 (compiled and sent on behalf of the of the Federal Tax Service of Russia (Moscow)) leads me to philosophical reflections.
How is this answer logically constructed?
It turns out that the Federal Tax Service (FTS) depends on the authorities (bodies) that carry out state cadastral registration and state registration of rights to real estate.
Yes, indeed, it is not denied in the answer: "You were, in particular, the owner - since 03.08.2016 until 03.06.2019 - of 1/2 share of a residential building located at the address indicated in your appeal. "
The object was listed in the tax base, the tax was calculated and paid, - the answer I received continues its (own) logic.
But the moment came, and the registration of the object was stopped in the Unified State Register.
What should the authorities of the Federal Tax Service do?
The FTS was also forced to exclude the object from its database and stop calculating the tax.
Yes...
But what about the fact that the object actually (in reality) exists, and formally it "disappeared"?
But what about the fact that the object is not displayed (not accounted) in the tax base?
But what about the fact that the tax is underpaid - paid in a deliberately reduced amount?
Nobody from the Federal Tax Service is interested in these questions ?!
Well...
There is, after all, a simple taxpayer (that is, Zalessky) ...
Isn't he interested in having his object listed in all databases?
Let him (a simple taxpayer) deal with (due to his material interest) this issue ...
And when his efforts lead to a result, then the object will again appear in the Unified State Register, will again enter the tax base, and will be taxed again.
This logic reminds me of a broker's thinking algorithm, which convinces the owner of money to place it in a brokerage account.
Doesn't the owner of the money understand his own benefits?
After the money of the (potential) investor comes to the brokerage account, wouldn't it be good for both the owner of the money and the broker?
Act quickly, and everything will be fine ...
Let's leave aside the fact that the efforts of the broker's client differ significantly from the actions to restore the object in the state databases.
If it is enough for the broker's client to give an order to the bank to transfer money, then to restore the object in the state databases, the efforts of specialists (possibly several) who have state status and receive salaries from the state are needed. And all this can last for a fairly noticeable period of time.
Let's set aside these considerations and thoughts.
Let us emphasize that the situation of ordinary taxpayers can differ significantly.
One taxpayer cheerfully, vigorously, tackles an existing problem.
And the other needs to understand the problem, think it over in detail ...
Is it permissible for the state, for a state official to make the protection of state interests dependent on some subjective factors ?? !!
And in general, it is strange if a public official, instead of performing his direct duty - instead of effectively, quickly, vigorously protecting the tax interests of the state (for which he receives a salary and benefits), tries to inform the taxpayer of the unfavorable situation of that taxpayer...
With the hope that an ordinary taxpayer will be able to solve the problem on his own?, that the taxpayer himself and the state can benefit from this decision?
Thank you for caring about the taxpayer, for informing him...
In general, the task of the State Man, armed with the state power, of the State Man, who has state funding, is to quickly and effectively protect the interests of the state, and not explain to a simple taxpayer an unfavorable situation of this taxpayer... (Although the informing of taxpayer is also helpful to some extent).
There are people of public duty, and there are people of the market interests (and with market income) ...
[MMCDXXXIV. Towards the Moon. I pay taxes. A diary note. - October 18, 2021.
MMCDXXXV. Towards the Moon. I'm concerned. I would like to pay the unpaid tax. A diary note. - October 18, 2021.
MMCDXLV. Towards the Moon. By the Front Door. A diary note. - October 22, 2021.
MMCDXLVI. Towards the Moon. While listening to the Valdai Speech. A diary note. - October 23, 2021.
MMCDLXXIII. Towards the Moon. While reading the G20 ROME LEADERS" DECLARATION. A diary note. - November 1, 2021.
MMDXXXIV. Towards the Moon. The recovery in the tax base is approaching. A diary note. - November 26, 2021.
MMDXXXV. Towards the Moon. A non-payment of tax (in full) and a tax secrecy. A diary note. - November 26, 2021.
MMDXLIII. Towards the Moon. The amount of unpaid tax is being specified. A diary note. - November 30, 2021.
MMDCXVI. Towards the Moon. Unpaid (in full) taxes and trips to the taiga. A diary note. - December 24, 2021.
MMDCXVIII. Towards the Moon. Mirrors of replies. A diary note. - December 25, 2021.].
December 25, 2021 14:20
Translation from Russian into English: December 25, 2021 17:02
Владимир Владимирович Залесский "К Луне. Государственный чиновник. И посредник-брокер. Дневниковая заметка".
{ 2649. К Луне. Государственный чиновник. И посредник-брокер. Дневниковая заметка.
MMDCXIX. Toward the Moon. A state official. And an intermediary broker. A diary note. }