Zalessky Vladimir : другие произведения.

Towards the Moon. The appeal has been redirected, the application has been registered. A diary note

Самиздат: [Регистрация] [Найти] [Рейтинги] [Обсуждения] [Новинки] [Обзоры] [Помощь|Техвопросы]
Ссылки:
Школа кожевенного мастерства: сумки, ремни своими руками
 Ваша оценка:
  • Аннотация:
    Towards the Moon. The appeal has been redirected, the application has been registered. A diary note.

  Towards the Moon. The appeal has been redirected, the application has been registered. A diary note.
  
  
  My interest in e-mail paid off (gave a result).
  
  I found two letters (two e-mails).
  
  One letter is dated March 15, 2022 (about the redirecting of the appeal).
  
  'The Office of the EGRN Rosreestr (hereinafter referred to as the EGRN) from the Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation received an appeal by Zalessky V.V. [in the original: "Zelessky V.V." - whether some object will be written to someone person ?...] dated February 16, 2022 (hereinafter referred to as the Appeal).
  
  ... we are sending the Application for joint consideration on the merits, as well as, if there are grounds, organizing and carrying out work to verify the information of the Unified State Register of Real Estate (hereinafter - EGRN) about the property of interest to the applicant.
  
  On the results of the consideration of the Appeal and the measures taken, the Rosreestr Office for the Rostov Region must send a response to the applicant no later than April 12, 2022, a copy of the response to the EGRN, including by e-mail:
  
  Application: for 7 liters. in 1 copy. in the first two addresses.
  
  Deputy Head of the EGRN Maintenance Department." [unofficial translation]
  
  
  The second letter is dated March 16, 2022.
  
  This letter is very short. 'Your appeal was registered in the 61st branch of the Federal State Budgetary Institution 'FKP Rosreestra' in the Rostov Region under No. OG-332/22. Your appeal will be considered within the period established by the Federal Law of 02.05.2006 No. 59 - FZ 'On the Procedure for Considering Appeals from Citizens of the Russian Federation.' [unofficial translation]
  
  Naturally, these documents require additional analysis.
  
  However, I can immediately say the following:
  
  
  1. In order to restore the "disappeared" object in the tax base and for the possible additional assessment and additional payment of tax, one cannot do without the EGRN. From the previously received answers, we can conclude that in order to restore an object in the 'tax base', it should be restored in the EGRN.
  
  My efforts gave a positive effect for the state, although small, although not yet very significant. The state machine is in motion. Let's hope that the object will be restored to the tax base, that the tax interests of the state, as well as the Lunar program of Russia will be protected.
  
  
  2. For me, as a person in a difficult financial situation, as a person interested in receiving compensation as soon as possible, the redirection of my appeal to the Rosreestr authority means another period of uncertainty, another period of waiting.
  
  It would be much more productive from the point of view of bureaucratic efficiency to pay me compensation, and in parallel - to work with the Rosreestr authorities to restore the object in the tax base - so it seems to me.
  
  
  3. Probably everyone understands that the story that has arisen has a kind of background. But to be drawn into this line of reasoning means to embark on an endless and very difficult to prove line of Criminology actions.
  
  I argue without "criminology": when I purchased a property, I saw a package of documents, I signed an acceptance certificate. I agreed with the acquisition of the property. Further, without my consent, they infringed on my rights - they 'seized' (as I understand it) the object from the EGRN. The object was in this legally uncertain position for about a year and a half, and it is not yet known how long it will remain in this position.
  
  I do not seek to deal with such an 'interesting' (legally vulnerable) object, and I do not intend to sign the second act of acceptance and transfer of the object.
  
  Can I be made the owner of an object without my consent and against my will?
  
  I suppose that such coercion to the status of the owner will be a new violation of the constitutional rights of property.
  
  Nowhere, in any document, I did not ask for a "second time" to register or "restore" - a kind of play on words - the ownership of the object.
  
  This object, as a result of some legally significant actions unknown to me, became - in my opinion - legally dubious. I do not intend to re-sign the act of acceptance and transfer, to re-enter ownership rights.
  
  
  4. If the object was 'withdrawn' from the EGRN, then, therefore, I suffered damage. Therefore, I am entitled to compensation.
  
  I do not intend to take on a huge burden of legal problems created without my participation (somewhere 'behind my back').
  
  I tend to follow this line of reasoning.
  
  And I insist on paying me compensation.
  
  I will think, I will write new documents ...
  
  Thanks to the state for taking care of me ...
  
  Probably, no one hoped that during these one and a half years (when the object was 'removed' from the EGRN) something would happen to me ...
  
  Would they have carried out - without me - "verification of the information of the Unified State Register of Real Estate (hereinafter - EGRN)"?
  
  In any case, instead of paying compensation - a new delay...
  
  
  [2464. К Луне. Я иду платить налоги. Дневниковая заметка. - 18 октября 2021 г.
  2465. К Луне. Я обеспокоен. Я хотел бы доплатить налог. Дневниковая заметка. - 18 октября 2021 г.
  2475. К Луне. У парадного подъезда. Дневниковая заметка. - 22 октября 2021 г.
  2476. К Луне. Слушая Валдайскую Речь. Дневниковая заметка. - 23 октября 2021 г.
  2503. К Луне. Читая Декларацию по итогам саммита G20 в Риме. Дневниковая заметка. -
  1 ноября 2021 г.
  2564. К Луне. Приближается восстановление в налоговой базе. Дневниковая заметка. - 26 ноября 2021 г.
  2565. К Луне. Не доплата налога и налоговая тайна. Дневниковая заметка. - 26 ноября 2021 г.
  2573. К Луне. Сумма недоплаченного налога уточняется. Дневниковая заметка. - 30 ноября 2021 г.
  2646. К Луне. Недоплаченные налоги и поездки в тайгу. Дневниковая заметка. - 24 декабря 2021 г.
  2648. К Луне. Зеркала ответов. Дневниковая заметка. - 25 декабря 2021 г.
  2649. К Луне. Государственный чиновник. И посредник-брокер. Дневниковая заметка. - 25 декабря 2021 г.
  2654. К Луне. Минфин и налоговые интересы государства. Дневниковая заметка. - 26 декабря 2021 г.
  2657. К Луне. Письмо от ФНС РФ (Москва). Дневниковая заметка. - 27 декабря 2021 г.
  2718. К Луне. Направлено по принадлежности. Дневниковая заметка. - 14 января 2022 г.
  2792. К Луне. 'Разговор немого с глухим' (в МИД РФ) или находится ли Ростовская область под суверенитетом РФ. Дневниковая заметка. - 10 февраля 2022 г.
  2795. К Луне. Размышления перед обращением в Совет Министров РФ. Дневниковая заметка. - 11 февраля 2022 г.
  2800. К Луне. Оптимальный вариант обращения в Совет Министров РФ. Дневниковая заметка. - 14 февраля 2022 г.
  2802. К Луне. Компенсации за прекращение государством моего права собственности. Дневниковая заметка. - 15 февраля 2022 г.
  2804. К Луне. Заявление в Минфин РФ о компенсации и о защите налоговых интересов государства отправлено. Дневниковая заметка. - 16 февраля 2022 г.
  2857. К Луне. Клавиатура и электронная почта. Дневниковая заметка. - 16 марта 2022 г.].
  
   16 марта 2022 г. 16:43
 Ваша оценка:

Связаться с программистом сайта.

Новые книги авторов СИ, вышедшие из печати:
О.Болдырева "Крадуш. Чужие души" М.Николаев "Вторжение на Землю"

Как попасть в этoт список

Кожевенное мастерство | Сайт "Художники" | Доска об'явлений "Книги"