Аннотация: MMMDV. The softening of morals both in football and in the accounting of state property. A moral note. - June 9, 2024.
The softening of morals both in football and in the accounting of state property. A moral note.
Today I read two groups of publications in the online media.
The first group concerns unpaid alimony.
The famous football player got married twice.
The first wife demanded to pay her alimony in full. Because of this, the football player had problems leaving Russia abroad.
But in his second marriage, this football player is happy, which there are several proofs of. Happy people are focused on their joy and may (temporarily) miss some formalities.
It's like a melodrama with a happy ending. If the second wife of a football player got married for the second time - at least, then maybe the first wife (who requires alimony) should think about arranging a personal life with some successful man?
Compare this with the story of another football player (which happened a few years ago). This other football player created several children with his first (de facto) wife. Then the marriage broke up. The footballer went down with his ex- (de facto) wife to the basement of one of the London banks, they opened a safe deposit box, took out a bag with two million euros in cash. The football player - as a delicate man - took a heavy bag so as not to burden his ex- (de facto) wife by such a load.
The former (de facto) wife now works as a TV presenter, she is looking for applications of her attractiveness.
The second wife of the same football player was not so accommodating, and she suddenly discovered that she had a serious infectious disease. Her bridge of her nose has sunk.
If the recent story looks like a melodrama, then the second (long-standing) (which happened a few years ago) one is a tragedy. Consequently, we see an obvious a softening of morals (reducing the level of cruelty).
Now I turn to the second group of information materials. These are materials about the Major General.
But first, two memories.
The first memory. One of the military correspondents brought this story to the audience (to radio listeners). He met a colonel who is now in the status of either a private or someone of a low level. This colonel returned from a business trip back to his unit (somewhere beyond the Urals), and one of his subordinates informed superiors that the colonel had forced this subordinate to make an illegal payment.
I omit the details. In general, now the military correspondent has the opportunity to talk with this (former) colonel, listens to his stories and makes these stories public.
The second memory. All kinds of people call the radio studio with questions. Live broadcast. One of the phone calls (it was about five years ago) was made by the father of an officer (who was after military college). He was taught, as one could understand, to be the commander of a motorized rifle platoon. But a graduate of the college is appointed the commander of a communications unit. He is invited to sign an act of acceptance of state property from the previous commander. The new commander does not understand anything about communication devices. By his qualifications, he is not able to understand what is written in the act of acceptance. A military college graduate has limited opportunities to complain and to contact the media. That's why his father calls, panic-stricken. The father fears that the problems of preserving state property will fall on his son, and the signing of the act cannot end well.
So, now we turn to the Major General. I read the materials about him, I read, and I didn't understand: and those who write about him - what do they think about his case? Are they taking at least some of his case seriously? Or do they consider it all a kind of farce?
However, if we recall something similar from the past, then there is a softening of morals.
Everyone looks at the Major General's case with a some understanding.
After reading about the happy football player (with his alimony) and about the combat Major General (with his case), imbued with the impression of softening morals, I thought: what? Maybe those "from the people" who are gathering in one of the large buildings in the center of the capital - maybe they should adopt some kind of resolution - so that combat officers and combat generals do not shake their nerves with slogans about the safety (preservation) of state property - with slogans, little realistic (in combat conditions)?
The easier it will be to save (to preserve) people's lives and state property.
June 09, 2024 11:34
Translation from Russian into English: June 9, 2024 13:44
Владимир Владимирович Залесский ' Смягчение нравов в футболе и в учёте государственного имущества. Моральная заметка '.
{ 3534. Смягчение нравов в футболе и в учёте государственного имущества. Моральная заметка. - 9 июня 2024 г.
MMMDV. The softening of morals both in football and in the accounting of state property. A moral note. - June 9, 2024.
Vladimir Zalessky Internet-bibliotheca. Интернет-библиотека Владимира Залесского. }