Аннотация: Sergei Furgal and the working group, Mikhail Degtyarev and the Folk's Council. August 2, 2020. The ultra-Synopsis.
Sergei Furgal and the working group, Mikhail Degtyarev and the Folk's Council. August 2, 2020. The ultra-Synopsis.
The flow of news about Sergei Furgal somehow diminished. It is unclear whether he receives mail, does he meet with representatives of the Public Supervisory Commission [Public Monitoring Commission], lawyers, deputies, what is his health?
In the Khabarovsk Krai, the press secretary of Sergei Furgal went on vacation followed by dismissal (https://www.hab.kp.ru/online/news/3963675/).
'The plan of Russian Prime Minister Mikhail Mishustin for the next week includes a visit to the Far East ...
Venediktov also noted that ... Khabarovsk could become one of the stops of the head of the Cabinet ... ' (https://deita.ru/article/480096).
According to the deputy (from the Liberal Democratic Party) Ivan Pilyaev "A working group was created headed by a member of the Federation Council from the executive body Elena Greshnyakova ... The working group is engaged in both the protection and material support of Sergei Ivanovich [Furgal]." (https://www.hab.kp.ru/daily/217163.5/4262339/)
First, let's talk in general about the working group, then go to the details.
Since the working group mainly unites representatives of the LDPR, it is under the influence of the leader of the LDPR Vladimir Zhirinovsky.
In our personal, subjective opinion, the further Vladimir Zhirinovsky and the federal structures of the Liberal Democratic Party dependent on him will be distanted of the case of Sergei Furgal, the more chances Furgal have to get out of the situation alive, healthy and with life prospects.
At the same time, if a working group is created and is functioning. So, it would be desirable to receive daily information on its activities. Moreover, the Liberal Democratic Party declares that we are not abandoning ours, ... therefore, it sincerely cares about Sergei Furgal. Daily information about such a care will work for the reputation of the Liberal Democratic Party.
If we assume that the federal structures of the Liberal Democratic Party will be removed from the Furgal case, then what should they do? What they started with - organizing daily meetings of members of parliament (from the Liberal Democratic Party) (and from other factions? why not?) with Sergei Furgal.
Who should deal with the issues of coordinating the activities of the deputies, organizing the defense of Sergei Furgal, his material and financial support (as well as, to an accessible extent, providing his family)?
The best option is one of the family members of Sergei Furgal. Let us recall Anton Chekhov, a Taganrog gymnasium student, who shouldered the responsibility for saving the family after his father was declared bankrupt and after a part of the family moved (flee?) from Taganrog to Moscow.
Apparently, now there are no such people in the family of Sergei Furgal.
Sergei Furgal would be very lucky if his family could put (in such a situation) at the head of all activities a person with the experience of the Arkhangelsk journalist Igor Rudnikov (https://www.bbc.com/russian/features-53421369).
Skeptics will object to this by the fact that an outsider can irrationally dispose of part of the money, even appropriate it.
First, the very formulation of the question is incorrect. In such a complex matter as organizing protection, it is difficult to separate some expenses from others. No formal reporting is possible. Everything is built on trust.
Secondly, even if a skilled and experienced person appropriated 75 percent of the money, he would have achieved the optimal result, using the remaining 25 percent.
In general, if it was possible (in the absence of opportunities for the sons and brothers of Furgal) to put a person with experience of Igor Rudnikov at the head of organizational concerns, then we would have real hope to see Sergei Furgal at large, alive, healthy and with the prospects for a further happy life.
Let's summarize our subjective position:
1. The further the federal structures of the Liberal Democratic Party and Vladimir Zhirinovsky will be distanted from organizational cares related to the case of Sergei Furgal, the more positive prospects Furgal has.
2. It is advisable for the LDPR representatives to bring their plans to a successful conclusion - to organize daily meetings of members of parliament with Sergei Furgal.
3. If the working group has already been created, then it is in the interests of the Liberal Democratic Party (as well as interested citizens) if it posts daily information about its activities on the Internet for general access.
4. It is advisable for the relatives of Sergei Furgal to put at the head of organizational affairs either the son (brother ...) of Sergei Furgal, or a person with the experience of Igor Rudnikov.
If information about the working group appeared in the events around Sergei Furgal, information about the Folk's Council appeared in the events around Mikhail Degtyarev.
The common thing between the working group and the Folk's Council is that both the group and the Council are largely the result of the functioning of the intellectual potential of the LDPR.
Unfortunately, we have no significant fresh information about the Folk's Council. It is not even clear, who is included in it, and whether this Council was gathered at least once.
Formations that may have been similar to the Folk's Council were created by one of the governors of the Primorsky Krai, who (suddenly) resigned. All these public structures with the resignation of their creator, judging by media reports, were covered with a copper basin [they ceased their activities].
Maybe Mikhail Degtyarev changed his mind - decided not to create any Folk's Council? On this topic, you can consult with the leader of the Liberal Democratic Party - Vladimir Zhirinovsky ...
02 August 2020 07:29
Translation from Russian into English: August 2, 2020 08:26.
Владимир Владимирович Залесский 'Сергей Фургал и рабочая группа, Михаил Дегтярев и Народный Совет. 2 августа 2020 г. Сверхкраткий обзор'.