Аннотация: An artificial intellect and a social (public) intellect. A brief essay on the history of a social (public) intellect.
An artificial intellect and a social (public) intellect. A brief essay on the history of a social (public) intellect.
Once upon a time, a society, a humanity listened to the sacred Teachers.
Then the Teachers came, many of whom were writers, and lived on the income from their books.
Next to them the Thinkers were, the authors of various kinds of political theories, which were also close to the literary sphere.
The 18th, 19th, 20th centuries were centuries of a writers.
In the first half of the 20th century, most developed countries had groups of world-famous writers who were in correspondence and in personal communication with each other.
A writing, a literature was their profession and a financial source, and they themselves constituted a kind of intellectual layer, the intellectual potential of society (along with a carriers of special, scientific knowledge).
In the 20th century, a cinema figures gradually replaced the writers, the actors of a literary sphere.
Surnames of film actors, directors, screenwriters, etc. sounded louder and louder. Writers - as people of universal fame and popularity - became a reality of the past.
If almost everyone can to recall a surname of a film industry figure today, then, on the contrary, there are practically no world-famous and world-popular writers left (mainly on a hearing - are the names from the past, from a past times and epochs).
But on the horizon of a film industry figures appeared a clouds.
People they are emotional, creative, not indifferent to the opposite sex.
Applicants for a film career are in a vulnerable, dependent state.
Why not free yourself from addiction, not go the way of an independent person who challenges his own destiny and society? As a human - an individual seeker of individual luck?
But few of them, of a beginners, are ready to take a loan from a bank (or in other way, at their own risk, to get money) and begin to carry out an independent commercial film project.
A financially safe acting career is more popular. Events move in stages - a getting of a role, of money (of a fame) ... A minimum of financial risks ... But, as a result, there is a lot of dependence on a decisions-makers (decisions - to whom what a role to give, to whom what a fee to pay ...).
And to which a position an addiction, a vulnerability, a desire not to remain a loser, not to be an "ordinary person" - but, vice versa, to get a success, a money and a fame in a cinema sphere - are leading, are escorting?
There is no a uniform answer to these questions. Today you can look at the situation from one point of view. And time will pass - and you will rethink the past. Something will be forgotten, and something will be coming to memory incontrovertibly, constantly ... And a picture will be seen in a whole new way ... A rethinking of the past sometimes turns into an independent financial project.
The most relevant social topics are declared a taboo. Do not aggravate the contradictions! Observe the requirements of political correctness!!
One way or another, a clouds are gathering over a cinema figures (a leaders of public intellect - those, who replaced the writers). There is a trend of a new "change of generations" on the Olympus of public intellect.
Who is replacing the figures of cinema and the cinema business?
They are being replaced by the most energetic, conscientious and independent figures in the journalistic profession. But their fate is not simple, their destiny very much is not simple. It seems these figures aren 't that many. But, however, whom do we know by name? Jamal Khashoggi? ...He is no longer alive ....
Who else is famous? The journalist from the German "Der Spiegel"? - But this is some kind of a separate case from the history of a world journalism.
In addition, cinema figures are being replaced by a prominent figures from the sphere of politics - those who become authors of memoirs (and sometimes diaries). If we take a creative product as a criterion - a book, - then they are writers.But in the way of life, the involvement in the political sphere, in the principles of income generation, they differ from those professional writers who lived independent lives, and whose a financial basis were a fees. Hence the feature of the intellectual politicians - they look at a society not "from the outside," but from the "political sphere." And such a situation affects their wisdom, makes a difficult an independence in a reflections.
What conclusions can be drawn from the above considerations?
The more talk about the artificial intellect, the less the potential of a social (public) intellect. The layer of people who were able to independently think about society and to present their independent views, their conclusions, their opinions to society (through the system of a book national market) is being washed away, is washing off and is washing through.
Oddly enough, during the development of a natural intellect (and in the absence of active talk about the artificial intellect), a science and a culture gained enormous development, and in some countries "a society of abundance" appeared. As for the talk about the development of the artificial intellect, it seems that the abundance is in inverse proportion to the volume of a such conversations ...
The day of March 9, 2020 brought some disappointment for the people of Russia. If earlier a huge hopes related to an artificial intellect began to arise. - And it seemed that soon will be a moment, and an artificial intellect will give a special quality of luckiness, of happiness to a playing of a large bankers on the world stock exchange platforms. - And residents of Russia will skate as a cheese in a butter.
But it seems that developments in the currency and oil markets are taking a very different turn...
March 9, 2020 18:25
Translation from Russian into English: March 10, 2020 07:18.
Владимир Владимирович Залесский 'Искусственный интеллект и общественный интеллект. Краткий очерк истории общественного интеллекта'.