# The Punitive Health Care

Лев Гунин

КАРАТЕЛЬНАЯ МЕДИЦИНА. Это первое в истории развёрнутое разоблачение медицинской мафии и карательной политики правительств в области медицины, основанное на подлинных событиях и фактах, и на подлинных документах. Нужен переводчик-энтузиаст, который смог бы перевести эту хронику преступлений на русский язык с английского.

Lev Gunin


THE PUNITIVE HEALTH CARE -

(HEALTH CARE AS A REPRESSIVE TOOL)


BOOK 1 - 8


* * *

The whole text of the chronological events and medical documents (under the name of "The Punitive Health Care - (Health Care as a Repressive Tool)" is available for examination only on the basis of the following contract between the author and the reader:


I (THE READER) GIVE MY CONSENT THAT, BY CLICKING CORRESPONDING LINKS AND ACCESSING THE TEXT OF "THE PUNITIVE HEALTH CARE", I AUTOMATICALLY AGREE TO THE FOLLOWING PRELIMINARY CONDITIONS [FOR READING]:


-- I am (at least) 18 years old.


1. I (the reader) is undertaking (commit myself) not to distribute the text of "The Punitive Health Care - (Health Care as a Repressive Tool)" - entirely, or in fragments; not to copy medical documents; and not to share the text and images without author' permission.


2. I (the reader) understand that the confidential information, which is contained in this text, cannot be used for any other [than the reading (extraneous; secondary)] purposes and needs, for any researches, essays, stories, etc.


3. I (the reader) commit myself not to sneer at open ticklish personal information (which sharing was induced by circumstances), not to savor any medical, physiological, or anatomic details, and not to use this text as a reason for mockery and persecution.


4. I (the reader) am warned by the author that, except for a number of obviously immoral (by definition) doctors' and medical staff's actions, other decisions and acts described in this "confession" are not subjected to hasty moral assessment because a) only experts can judge finally about their justification and fairness; b) explanations and vindications of other party are necessary. We also do not know to what degree the doctors were under an influence and direct power of police, Ministry of Immigration, and other enforcement agencies, political organizations, groups and persons - with their own ideological, economic, and propaganda interests, - and to what degree this influence impacted on their diagnostic conclusions and assessments of patient's state of health. Many of the documentary confirmed facts incontestably demonstrate that author's ideological stand (who's opposing to younger generation's transformation into zombie-biorobots with mobile phones on shoulders instead of heads; to electronic totalitarianism with its prison-like total video surveillance; and to the tyrannical political censorship) played nearly a major role in enraging the authorities and triggering the persecutions.


5. I (the reader) am warned that the author sees the main cause of the most dramatic (for him) events in the fact that the enforcement agencies and interested persons and groups managed to present him to the medical community as an individual incapable to evaluate his health condition objectively; as a health-consciousan (or hypochondriac); an extremist; a troublemaker; an individual obsessed with panic and alarm patterns; as a person, who is making unreal demands to the system of medical care - concerning his - allegedly - pseudo-maladies and exaggerated gravity of trivial indispositions. This smear campaign of defamation, scurrilous libel, and wicked calumny made impossible receiving an adequate medical care (and sometimes any medical help at all), and led to health undermining, numerous diseases, incidents, and unnecessary sufferings. Doctors also considered difficult to believe in continuous (not connected with each other) illnesses, with an interval of 4-7 days, sometimes rolling at the same time: as tsunami. They refused to believe in these sequences of illnesses' painful course, danger, and significance. This chronicle disproves such a prejudiced opinion, producing an incontestable evidence.


6. I (the reader) am informed that all negative remarks, characteristics, and facts' assessments belong only to the portrayal of criminal groups, extremists, and carriers of anti-humanistic, racist, and totalitarian ideology, but do not contain groundless generalizations and negative assessment of any country, ethnic group, or religion. The author is categorically against dismantling of any of the existing states, and against restrictions of the rights of religious congregations of any faith.


7. I (the reader) am informed that this edition partially presents the previous 2017 edition without any changes, and, thus, may not correspond to later view and opinions.


8. I (the English reader) am informed that some parts of the following English text of "The Punitive Health Care" - were translated from Polish, Russian, or French originals, and may contain primitive language, double interpretation, or puzzled meaning. Such confusing fragments should be compared with their originals in Polish and Russian languages (author's native languages) [2016-2017]; all controversial points must be resolved through such a comparison.


9. In the very last moment of this edition's make-up (April 2023), the author came across a description of so-called Havana-syndrome, and found same symptoms and complications, which he experienced when was attacked by an unknown remote weapon (3 Nov. 2005, 7 Jan. 2013, and 21 June 2016), and developed symptoms of post-microwave irradiation.


_________


THE CONTENT (THE ENTIRE WORK)


BOOK 1-Part-1: The Era of Post-Humanism:

1. The Preamble. (A Deep Analysis of the Modern Situation).

2. Introduction. (The Demolition of Humanistic Society).

3. Sabotage; Provocations; Destruction and Obliteration of Literary and Music Works.

[also: Tragedy in Old Montreal (16 Mar. 2023 (arson): Criminal Explosion's Cover Up.]


BOOK 2: Oppression in Action:

The Punitive Health Care (the beginning of medical terror):

CHAPTER 1

CHAPTER 2

CHAPTER 3

CHAPTER 4

CHAPTER 5

CHAPTER 6

CHAPTER 7

CHAPTER 8

CHAPTER 9


BOOK 3-1: Who Destroyed my Vision and Hearing - part 1:

CHAPTER 1

CHAPTER 2

CHAPTER 3

CHAPTER 4

CHAPTER 5

CHAPTER 6

CHAPTER 7

CHAPTER 8

CHAPTER 9

CHAPTER 10

CHAPTER 11

CHAPTER 12

CHAPTER 13

CHAPTER 14


BOOK 3-2: Who Destroyed my Vision and Hearing - part 2:

CHAPTER 1

CHAPTER 2

CHAPTER 3

CHAPTER 4

CHAPTER 5


BOOK 3-3: Who Destroyed my Vision and Hearing - part 3:

CHAPTER 1

CHAPTER 2

CHAPTER 3

CHAPTER 4

CHAPTER 5

CHAPTER 6


BOOK 4-1: The Mistreatment of my Injuries - part 1:

CHAPTER 1

CHAPTER 2

CHAPTER 3

CHAPTER 4

CHAPTER 5

CHAPTER 6

CHAPTER 7

CHAPTER 8

CHAPTER 9

CHAPTER 10

CHAPTER 11


BOOK 4-2: The Mistreatment of my Injuries - part 2:

CHAPTER 1

CHAPTER 2

CHAPTER 3

CHAPTER 4

CHAPTER 5


BOOK 4-3: The Mistreatment of my Injuries - part 3:

CHAPTER 1

CHAPTER 2

CHAPTER 3

CHAPTER 4

CHAPTER 5

CHAPTER 6


BOOK 5-1: The Urological Drama - part 1:

CHAPTER 1

CHAPTER 2

CHAPTER 3


BOOK 5-2: The Urological Drama - part 2:

CHAPTER 1

CHAPTER 2

CHAPTER 3

CHAPTER 4

CHAPTER 5

CHAPTER 6

CHAPTER 7

CHAPTER 8


BOOK 5-3: The Urological Drama - part 3:

CHAPTER 1

CHAPTER 2

CHAPTER 3

CHAPTER 4

CHAPTER 5

CHAPTER 6

CHAPTER 7

CHAPTER 8


BOOK 5-4: The Urological Drama - part 4:

CHAPTER 1

CHAPTER 2

CHAPTER 3

CHAPTER 4

CHAPTER 5


BOOK 5-5: The Urological Drama - part 5:

CHAPTER 1

CHAPTER 2

CHAPTER 3

CHAPTER 4

CHAPTER 5

CHAPTER 6


BOOK 5-6: The Urological Drama - part 6:

CHAPTER 1

CHAPTER 2

CHAPTER 3

CHAPTER 4

CHAPTER 5

CHAPTER 6

CHAPTER 7

CHAPTER 8


BOOK 5-7: The Urological Drama - part 7:

CHAPTER 1

CHAPTER 2

CHAPTER 3

CHAPTER 4


BOOK 5-8: The Urological Drama - part 8:

CHAPTER 1

CHAPTER 2

CHAPTER 3

CHAPTER 4

CHAPTER 5

CHAPTER 6

CHAPTER 7


BOOK 5-9: The Urological Drama - part 9:

CHAPTER 1

CHAPTER 2

CHAPTER 3

CHAPTER 4


BOOK 5-10: The Urological Drama - part 10:

CHAPTER 1 - Brief Retelling. Vanished Tests.

CHAPTER 2. 2015: Missing Tests and Other Bizarre Things.

CHAPTER 3. 2016: January-February

CHAPTER 4. March 1-18, 2016.

CHAPTER 5. March 19-31, 2016.


BOOK 5-11: The Urological Drama - part 11:

CHAPTER 1. April 1-8, 2016.

CHAPTER 2. April 8-29, 2016.

CHAPTER 3. May 2016.

CHAPTER 4. Pre-operational tests - March-May 2016.

CHAPTER 5. Since 15 May 2016.

CHAPTER 6. Since 26 May 2016.

CHAPTER 7. June 2016.

CHAPTER 8. 20 June 2016.

CHAPTER 9. July 2016.

CHAPTER 10. August 2016.

CHAPTER 11. September-November 2016.

CHAPTER 12. December 2016.


BOOK 5-12: The Urological Drama - part 12:

CHAPTER 1. March, 2017.

CHAPTER 2. May-August 2017.

CHAPTER 3. September-October 2017.

CHAPTER 4. November-December 2017.

CHAPTER 5. January-May 2018.

CHAPTER 6. June-December 2017

CHAPTER 7. January-April 2017.

CHAPTER 8. May-December 2017.


BOOK 5-13: The Urological Drama - part 13:

CHAPTER 1. January-February, 2020.

CHAPTER 2. March-May, 2020.

CHAPTER 3. June-December 2020.

CHAPTER 4. March-December 2021.

CHAPTER 5. January-December 2022.

CHAPTER 6. January-February 2023.


BOOK 6: The Dental Ordeal:

CHAPTER 1

CHAPTER 2

CHAPTER 3

CHAPTER 4

CHAPTER 5

CHAPTER 6


BOOK 7: Conclusions:

CONCLUSIONS-1

CONCLUSIONS-2

CONCLUSIONS-3

CONCLUSIONS-4


BOOK 8: Police Intimidation and Digital Terror

1. The Case of Politically Motivated Persecutions in 6 parts.


2. Introduction:

1) Politically-motivated police intimidation (hundreds of stoppings, interrogations, interceptions, escorts by police; police surveillance, escorting to medical institutions), and the refusal of an investigation and of a written response to complaints.

2) Canadian media (TV, radio, newspapers, etc.), human rights organizations, and other recipients of the written declaration ignored all letters about the police intimidation, - and never replied. Also: deprivation of legal aid and of civil rights.

3) Systemic sabotage of phone line, Internet-access, and email services; innumerous disconnections of Internet and phone. Blockage of medical, educational, and other web sites. [Internet-Emails Sabotage 1997-2021.]

4) Medical crimes, discrimination and persecution in medical institutions, and police escorts to medical facilities. [The Punitive Health Care as a Repressive Tool (see above: BOOKS 1-7)]

5) Provocations, attacks, property damage, beatings, etc. [As part of points 1,2, 3, 4, and 6.]

6) Violations of my voter"s rights (removal from voters" lists in the provincial elections).


3. Police Intimidation and Lawlessness. Deprivation of Legal Aid.


4. Virtual House Arrest via Isolation: Phone-Net Disconnection; Emails Sabotage; Massive Viruses Attacks; Disconnection from the Search Engines; etc. (Real documents; screenshots; official and legal correspondence; etc.).


------------------------


BOOK 1


THE PREAMBLE


1

The right to live is the most fundamental human right, which absence is simply erasing all other human rights and freedoms. If this - the most essential - human right (to be alive) is reversed and transformed into the license (right) to kill: it makes all other laws, rights, and freedoms irrelevant.


Without guarantying people their right to stay alive, so-called "democratic states" are losing their l'exigence d'être, and, consequently, are losing the battle against the modern (neofeudal by nature [neo-fascist and neo-communists by demagogic ideology]) populism and dictatorship.


Instead of enforcing the right for life, those hypocrites are legalizing the right for death (the right to kill (license to kill): for profit, for fun, for social domination, for elimination of so-called "social balance", or for other goals and reasons.


When the predatory landlords evict families or single tenants (who have no place to go), or increase the rent up to the limits: it is abundantly clear that they are murderers, because the evicted tenants will sooner or later die from homelessness, stress-related strokes, heart attacks, or an overdose (the housing insecurity is the main trigger of mass desperation, drug addiction, and the opioid crisis), or from a bullet; a number of spouses will be killed by their partners, as the soaring housing prices and related insecurity threats are the main source that drives the conjugal violence.


By denying Canadians the off-job sick days, the authorities and the employers are actually murdering people (some of sick workers will develop complications due to this, and die; others will infect their co-workers, and some of whom will later die, etc.), and this is just another example of the principle to kill for profit.


By creating "exclusions" from the norms of the industrial pollutions and wastes, or violating the norms, the industry and the governments are actually killing people by poisoning them, and - first of all: poisoning children.


Those, who blame - for all these vampire practices - scarecrows like "capitalism", or "patriarchate's ("misogynic") society", do not understand the nature of vampires, or they are just liars.


The extensive exploitation of non-unionized marginalized workers (like natives from the low social classes, racialized people or non-documented migrants, immigrants without permanent residency status, new immigrants (etc.) - is actually killing many of them, shortening their lives. Many of them are killed or injured at work (without receiving any compensation!); others are dying because they are placed in an unsafe and unhealthy environment, exposed to infections and infectious diseases, while others can die from homelessness and hunger, because their exploiters pay them such a humiliatingly (unfairly) small salary, that it leaves no chances to survive. A great part of medical nurses is fitting into this category, because they are subjected to an extremely extensive exploitation and burn out at work. This whole system is the system of killing for profit, which is designed by predators for predators, maintained by predators, and lobbying by predators.


While the social inequality and injustice is exponentially growing, and millions of people in the prosper countries are dying from its consequences, the very rich and the super-rich are cynically spending astronomical sums of money for entertainment, luxury, pleasures, and leisure. They are literarily burning out an enormous part of public resources, which are de facto allocated for hundreds of millions of human beings, who suffer (while receiving no (or no sufficient) help) from hunger, homelessness, untreated illnesses, natural disasters, criminal violence, police brutality, oppression, poverty, and discrimination. By spending so much to please their egoistic needs, they are literally becoming cannibals, committing mass murders, taking away the rest from those who are already deprived of the essentials.


Presently, in 2017, there are rumors about the commercial space travels that will be launched in the coming 3-5 years. If so, they will merely burn even more astonishing resources for nothing, while millions and milliards (billions) of people are suffering and dying because they are lacking the essentials. The paid jerks will speak of the illusive benefits like additional jobs or scientific advantages, but this - of course - will be a paid lie.


The governments and the ruling elite start innumerous wars, not only burning out an enormous part of the national resources (which could create a heaven of Earth, eliminating poverty and hunger, diseases and homelessness), but killing tenth of millions of human beings "in the process". All claims that it is their rival or rivals have started the war - is a lie: firstly, because, usually, not the righteous, but a stronger side win wars, and the victors always impose their version of history and of who was "an aggressor"; secondly, because an initiator of a war is a stronger side (which has more chances to win and almost nothing to lose, and, more often, wins indeed); thirdly, because two opponents in the same category of strength ALWAYS start a war (against each other) simultaneously; and, finally, because - in the most of the cases - both sides, which wage the most bloody wars in history against each other, are (as a rule) merely gladiators, not just instigated, but compelled by the "peaceful" (but, in reality, the most hideous) states to start a military conflict. The most of the wars are waged from the distance by the most powerful and the craftiest treacherous states, which destroy their competitors by instigating a war between the latter, or by arming, financing, and motivating a "cannon-fodder" state to attack its neighbor (these powerful states actual or potential competitor).


The democracy is an advantage that makes stable countries stronger; so, consequently, no one will endow a potential contestant with such a strategic tool; on the opposite, the privileged will always keep it for themselves exclusively - out of the reach (as an atomic bomb), only pretending that they are "spreading" it among nations, but, in reality, supporting the most tyrannical dictatorships, theocracies, and monarchies.


Another reason for the hegemons not to allow democracy for others is its excessive cost, in comparison with autocracies, tyrannies, or dictatorships. In some smaller countries democracy is rational and quite sustainable. In other small, larger, and, especially, in big countries - democratic society and its ruling elite become so costly that need a ceaseless flow of money and resources, which can be obtained only by looting and robbing other nations. If all countries become democratic - then the hegemons are going to lose a pretext for attacking, raiding, and looting the outside world (the main excuse for ruining "them", brain-draining, capitals sucking - disappears). This is why democracies always need an enemy, and many of dictators are their creatures.


The most monumental tragedies of humanity are fueled by lie, double standards, and hypocrisy.


For example, some brave persons in the media are accusing the construction mafia in causing the pollutions and environmental disasters; cultural genocide (mass demolitions of the cultural-historical sites, Christian churches, etc.); homelessness; mass poverty and hunger; noise that terrorize whole neighborhoods; disappearance of parks and green zones in the cities; dirty money laundering; corruption; criminal arsons, which kill hundreds of people; intimidation (or even murders) of home owners, whose property is blocking the construction of new profitable projects; and so on; but no one able to say that banks are behind everything that the construction mafia is up to. Even more courage you need to recognize (at least, silently, just for yourself) that the majority of the bankers are members of the same cultic milieu, which is hostile to Christian religion by definition. I am not touching the word "conspiracy", but, at least, we have here a classic example of the conflicts of interests.


Or let's take another example. Now, when I am preparing the most complete version (for today) of this chronicle (my record of the medical crimes, committed against me personally), I often hear calls for president Trump (who recently came to the office) to ban Chinese and other countries' web, android, and laptop applications, which, allegedly, interfere in American and Canadian elections. There no clear evidence of that, and, anyways, the ability of such foreign states to influence the voters in such well-controlled internally countries is insignificant. However, other foreign states - like Israel - are OPENLY meddling into American and Canadian elections, having their OFFICIAL lobby, and nobody cares! The Facebook (with all its branches and applications) - this perfect political tool of the Israeli state's influence, - is interfering into democratic elections, spying on citizens, and violating all democratic principles: and nobody cares. Banning other foreign social media and applications will only give a new advantage for the Israeli lobby.


There are thousands of other examples of the hypocrisy of the governments, and of the monstrously giant monument of lie and deception, which erodes the very foundation of the democracy.


However, the generations, which have the ugliest governments, sometimes deserve what they have. It is not fair to blame only the governments - and even the ruling elite in general - concerning this tragic turn, which leads the humanity to an abyss. Recently, I shared some of the excerpts of my chronicle with people in different countries (or, to be most precise: with doctors and with patients). Their reaction was very perplexing. Some of them were "oppressed" by my revelations, because they want to keep the title of the biggest sufferers on the planet (under their dictatorial regimes), and don't wish to share this title with someone else. Others felt "insulted", because not they came to some of important conclusions, and felt themselves as "not the champions (generators) of the fresh ideas".


Some of them became hostile, because, as they believe, the most important thing in the world is to destroy their "usurper" regime and its leader (to destroy even physically: it was clear by stresses or by an intonation), and my revelations, allegedly, are distracting the "oppressed people", preventing them from concentrating on this "holy" goal. Such kind of people considered this objective (to bring down their government) - the most important mission in the world, even if they live in such stable countries as Belgium, Austria, or Sweden. They were the "twin brothers" of those, who live under the real autocracies, because both were ready to use any terrorist methods, to employ any arm (including the atomic bomb), and both did not even think about what will happen after.


Some of them said that one or another doctor (depending of their family names) could not do bad things, because people of their national descent are all good, noble, and are the "best" in the world. They demanded that I should immediately remove doctors with such and such family names from my chronicle. The funniest thing was that some of such nationalists added that, contrary to doctors of their ethnic group, a doctor with such or such family name could be able to commit any thinkable and unthinkable cruelties indeed, because "all of them" (an ethnonym followed) are "devils", "murderers", and "underhumans", while the representatives of the "underhumans" nations had some very similar opinions about their critics.


I tried to share my horrific experience with people from other Canadian provinces, but some of them used to switch the topic to the "problem" of "Quebec nationalism", while others interrupted me, claiming that "in their province" the health care situation is even worse.


None of these selfish people was able to see my work as a warning about a global tendency, and recognize that this is not about Canada, not about Quebec, but about the universal things, about their own countries, and about the most important issue - which is human life. The Canadian "entourage" is just a background, because the similar things now surface in any other country of the world, and all governments started to "politisize" and transform the health care into an oppressive and discriminatory political tool.


None of these egoists wanted to hear arguments or explanations: they believe not in the truth, reasons, or justice, but in their own ability to impose their particular views on others by brutal force (and always counting on help of their fellow partisans). Driven by their hatred, anger, aggression, jealousy, bloodthirstiness, envy, and by other negative emotions (which overtook their realistic thinking like narcotics), they only want to kill and destroy.


Unfortunately, little by little, such people form a majority everywhere, and their destructive nature is hardly less destructive than the atomic bomb.


In their egoistic selfishness, they are even worse than their oppressors are, and, if they'll seize the power in any country, the world will shudder.


Such people start revolutions and wars easily; they set up concentration camps to get rid of their ideological opponents. They are only thinking how to bring down any government by force.


This is why it is so important to stand firmly against any violence, including the violence against the government. The things became so dusk not because merely the governments are "so bad", but because we, people, became so egoistic and self-absorbed that it threats the very existence of humanity.


This is why I needed such a long introduction to my work: to show and to stress that we can change things without violence, aggression, revolutions, and expropriations; because anger and violence leads to more violence and deaths.


Canada (as a colony of the British Empire) was the last country in the civilized world - where workers' rights and an access to health care were still neglected. The working people were like slaves. And an access to doctors was reserved only for the very rich.


When the military conflict with the Nazi Germany was approaching, and the population became so non-loyal to the rulers due to the miserable situation of ordinary people, the ruling class was forced to start the hectic reforms: to revise the labour legislation, and to introduce a universal public health care. However, this happened not because the government had such a desire, but as the result of the struggle of many generations of Canadians (who, by strikes and protests, by the civil disobedience, and by other legal methods, pushed the country to such a great achievement). And we, inheriting this magnificent achievement as a precious gift from the past generations of ordinary Canadians, are going to lose it, if we'll not be worthy of this miracle, because we became too greedy, too spoiled, and too selfish. An ancient Greek proverb, which points that a selfish person gets what he deserved, but an altruistic person received a second chance, can be applied to us.


* * *


Health care has two equal missions (goals), but only one of them is presently recognized by the medical bureaucrats - the healing of the body, while another one - the goal to reduce the suffering - is completely neglected. This sadistic approach to medical patients is a product of such a negligence - fueled by the same sadistic strives as the popularization of piercing and tattoo culture, - which, in the civilized societies, was in the past mostly attributed to criminals and sailors. And, because the modern medical ideology is seeing humans as biological mechanisms, and has no interest in soul and in easing of human suffering, it can only offer a single (and only) measure against suffering: so-called "medically-assisted death" (euthanasia), which is the most despised and abominable form of pure murder. When a homeless man comes to a social worker asking for help, and this latter, instead, is offering the "euthanasia"; or an addict hear from medical workers about "an easy way" "to end the suffering" (euthanasia): this is a cynical triumph of the transformation of humanistic mission of health care into something opposite: into a horrific anti-humanism.


For thousands of years, the governments are using the qualified medical help as a lever of their power and influence, which helps them to oppress and control the population. Only those, who were loyal to a despot, used to be awarded by the medical treatment. The slaves were deprived of any access to medical help during the slave-owning and feudal eras.


The principle of awarding only the privileged elite by the qualified medical treatment was one of the milestones of any oppressive tyrannical system.


However, a tradition of self-healing and of practical healing knowledge existed among the common people, passed from generation to generation, and, from time to time, was becoming more refined and advanced, giving excellent results. People's healers (the "witches", the shamans) were becoming very influential, competing with the state, and the governments always responded by bloodshed and atrocities (this was one of the reasons behind the legendary inquisition's "witch hunt").


So-called "democratic" states, and so-called "socialist" ("communist") states have never planned a real accessible (and equally adequate for all citizens) health care system. Only under an abnormal pressure from workers' strikes and from their struggle for medical rights, the authorities were forced to make concessions to population. And only thanks to an army of altruistic doctors, who made the system workable, and also played a great role in designing its architecture, the medical help became theoretically more or less available for everybody, but for historically very short periods of time. The last such period in Canada lasted no more than 20 years, till the end of 1990-s, when the medical help began to become inaccessible for wider and wider layers of population.


We must honor (for all the achievements in this domain) not the state bureaucrats, but thousands and millions of medical workers, who very often were acting as true heroes for delivering the relief and healing IN SPITE of all the impediments provoked by the governments and the ruling elite.


However, the governments were trying to corrupt the medical system and doctors by turning the medical help into a huge industry, twisted to an opposite direction from altruism: towards the industrial impersonality, indifference, negligence, and profit.


The Soviet health care system became partially dysfunctional not because of the "defects" of the public health system, but because - by that time - it became corrupted and, subsequently, subjected to hidden privatization.


The Canadian public health system became dysfunctional already in 2000-s not because it was "badly" designed, but because it became not a public health care anymore, being altered and intruded by the hidden commercialization. You can pump any amount of nation's money into this clandestinely privatized system, but all the money will be stolen - and will go to the hands of the profit sharks.


If the governments of the modern states - from North to South, and from West to East of the Planet, - would care about people, and would be interested in the healthy population, they would build the health care strategy not on the fire-engine principle, but on prophylactic. Healthy diet, healthy food, safe sport, healthy lifestyle, prophylactic medical examinations of citizens (with instructive, non-intrusive, physiotherapeutic, or pharmacological follow-ups), and an adequate first medical aid - would become a priority. Thousands of instructors would educate and control nation's health in schools, factories, offices, and bureaus. But, instead, the governments - and the elites behind them - have made billions of dollars on tobacco and alcohol; have spread drug addiction; disseminated risky and dangerous sports, which cripple and kill millions of young people; thrust (on population) the unhealthiest food, which destroy health of millions of people; polluted and poisoned water, air, soil, and buildings; and presently do everything possible to close the venue of education (in general; not only to medical education) for the 90 per cent of population.


The easiest and the most efficient way to make people healthier is to introduce a compulsory medical education in kindergartens, schools, colleges, and universities, with the obligatory practical training, not restricted by the first aid. Someone can argue that today the Internet gives a unique opportunity for medical self-education, and for learning about any illness, but, in reality, without the basic fundamental medical knowledge, the fragmental medical awareness in useless, and - sometimes - even dangerous; some web sites provide non-complete, some - misleading information, and many of them are just blocking an access to wider and wider categories of people.


2


The most cherished dream of all tyrants and dictators is to impose their evil power without being labeled as oppressors and war criminals, and not to employ such symbols of crimes against humanity as totalitarian prisons and concentration camps.


The modern technology and the system of today's "medical" laws made their dream closer than ever.


I wrote in 2014: "Despite miraculous new technologies and good quality of life in the best countries like Canada, pollution and climate change, stressful environment, growing exploitation & social inequality, marginalization of talented people, hostility between different groups of very fragmented society, injuries and traumatism related to hectic lifestyle, and bizarre medical practices, - the number of sick people has been doubled and triples, and no one can avoid doctors and hospitals".


"Alternative medicine is suppressed or forbidden, or became too expensive; traditional people's cures are not allowed or lost; and an access to oriental medical traditions and remedies is limited, expensive, or complicated. In such a situation, we became hostages of a system that fails to reduce human suffering and to prevent - adequately - health degradation and untimely death".


Since then - Canada lost its place among the best countries, and is not in this category anymore; and all above stated problems became not just problems, but calamities.


The aim of such an extended introduction is to convince the reader that so-called "health care crisis" is not a real "crisis", but a product of the devaluation of the value of human life in general. When, deeply plunged in our individualism, egoism, and selfishness, we allowed the sinister forces, which made the governments their puppets, to deflate the value of human life, reducing it to "0" (Zero), we opened an abyss for ourselves.


The value of a VIP person' life today is equal to the value of gods' lives, while the value of an ordinary person became cheap like a toilet paper. Today the universal standard of the respect and security of a human life in general became abolished, and people are valued by their neo-feudal estate and title, by their connections, influence, monetary wealth, relation to the repressive organs and the government, by their social function, and so on.


[An insert of 2022: This is why 6 people died in last 3 years just in the Lakeshore Hospital's emergency room alone, after waiting for many hours, and not been even assessed by the doctors. They died - because they were "not important" for the government and for the ruling elite, which representatives have the medical help delivered to them anyways.]


We are regarded not even as slaves anymore, but like commodities, because, watched 24-hours a day by the Orwellian Eyes of Evil (the spy-cameras) [which were mounted under a pretext of "security", but, together with their expansion, the crimes have doubled and tripled, and insecurity gained its domination!], spliced with the mobile phones and other electronic devices [which spy on us 48 hours per day! registering everything that we do, speak, and think], and drowned into these electronic synopses' "simulacra" (read Descartes and watch the film "The Matrix"), we've been disconnected from the reality, from the real world long ago, and were turned into the inanimate objects.


Have you ever wondered, why, presenting the most oppressive regimes as the "evil rogue states", and their leaders - as living monsters, the state propaganda in our "democratic" countries never goes too deep into the details, limiting its criticism only to an abstract general demagogy like "formal multi-party systems", "false" elections, or "jailed oppositionists"? We are never informed about the real life in these "bad" countries; about their rules and laws; or about their parliamentary system; or about their health-care system; or about their police brutality; or about the situation with the child labour there; or about the housing problems. Do you know, why? It is because we would find, then, more similarities, than the differences, and would question ourselves: why our social inequality and social problems are so mush like theirs; why the injustice and cruelty in our countries so closely reminds us the injustice and cruelty there; and why an access to the medical care, to general education, to the justice system and lawyers, etc. - sometimes even better than in the vaunted "democracies"? In some areas we are doing better; in other areas they are better then us; but the general picture is not so bright in our garden.


[Inception of 2020: Do you know that the biggest prisons' population per capita is not in China, not in North Korea, not in Iran, and not in Russia, but in the United States [more than 1 million 560 thousands inmates in 2020]? Do you aware that only in Texas more than half thousand people were executed between 1976 and 2019? Did you know that the leading role in America is taken over by the private prisons, run not by the government, but by the slave-owner enterprises? "There are of course those who benefit from the large prison population of the United States, namely those that provide services in the highly profitable prison industry. In 2018, a little over 53 billion U.S. dollars was spent on state correctional facilities in the United States. Unsurprisingly, such astronomical expenditure levels have prompted critics to voice their concern over the extent of privatization present in the American prison system. After all, it appears unlikely those running the prisoners or coordinating prisoner-related services will seek lower incarceration rates in the future so long as their bottom line is dependent on the number of those unwillingly donning an orange jumpsuit". ("Statista" Organization)] (See also: Stephen Lendman. "Political Prisoners in America"; Marc Mauer. "Race to Incarcerate"; etc.)


Do you know that, while the child labour in India, China, and in some other countries was restricted or partially abolished, there are more than 76 thousand children in United States from 13 (and, as some sources claim - UNDER 13) to 16 years old, who are forced to work (including the murdering-hard jobs in construction and other industries) - instead of going to school? So-called "sponsors" are trickily charging them for "sponsorship", "costs", and "services", demanding to pay off big amounts of money, and, under this pretext, enslave them. Children-slaves work in big cafeteria and restaurant chains in New York; in such big companies as General Motors; in some branches of such companies as Amazon and Facebook; etc. Some specialists claim that the number of the slave children in United States is much bigger, and represented by such digits as millions. It is just the terminology that differ same problems in the "oppressive" and (allegedly) "non-oppressive" countries, which call the child labor "volunteer aid" or "education"; hunger - "food insecurity"; homelessness - "housing insecurity"; and so on; but the ugly reality is the same. Millions of children experience hunger in Canada: in one of the richest countries in the world; a considerable percent of the pregnant women has no money to buy normal nutrition food; hundreds of thousands or millions children in Canada live under a threat of eviction by the landlords: in the country with the very cold winter and with the deficit of movers and moving services.


A huge part of the children-slaves is killed in United States every year in the most horrific work accidents. We will never learn about the real numbers - for obvious reasons. Since 2016, some USA governmental departments are investigating the deaths of children during their working hours, but, to the knowledge of available sources, no one among the real responsible persons (and NOT some small actors) was criminally charges, and no measures were taken to stop the children labor.


Not accidently some of USA states are actively promoting the fundamental changes in the Labor Code, dreaming about the abolishing of the law about the prohibition of child labor.


Repercussions in the couloirs of the Quebec parliament have reached my ears, alerting about Quebec's most radical anti-humanists' (in the local government) plans to legalize wide and age-ignoring child labor, in addition to another anti-human law, which already legalized euthanasia for children, mentally ill, or non-terminally ill patients, etc. According to some statistical information, children (including 12-14 years-old) represent up to 20 percent of the workers in restaurants, cafeterias, and small groceries, and job-related traumatism (and deaths!) of working children is astonishingly looming in Quebec.


In 1960-s - 1970-s (and, partially, even in 1980-s (still), one working family member earned (as a rule) enough for the whole family to subsist, to buy a house and 1-2 cars, and to have a certain sum of money in bank. In mid-1990-s, two (2) working family members could just meet the ends, and, with VERY smart planning, ascetic lifestyle, and - with all possible economies - were able (in SOME cases) to buy a house. In 2000-s - mid-2010-s even three (3) full-time working adults were not able to buy an apartment, a condo, or a house for a family, just surviving: if were ordinary working-class people. Now, in late 2010-s and in the beginning of 2020-s, 2 or 3 working family members are living on subsistence wage, and hardly make both ends meet, sometimes not able to pay the rent and being evicted by the cannibal landlords. So, NOW this Moloch sacrifice oblation machine demand our children and grandchildren, to exploit, mutilate, and kill them: it not satisfies with 2-3 adults anymore.


Thus, we are slipping into an abyss of the situation in the countries, which were once one hundred of the light years away from Canada in the human rights, social justice, and medical care domains.


I still believe that, at the given moment, we are doing a bit better; and that - if I lived not in Canada (and, especially, not in Quebec!) - my destiny would be even more miserable. However, each year the gap between the human standards and the political oppression in the "most oppressive states" - and us: is shrinking very quickly.


Evidently, it shrinks so fast because the standards of living are improving so drastically for the very few, while the overwhelming majority of population is sinking into the nightmare of insecurity and suffering, and the purposeful demolition of the public health care by all political players and by all influential "clubs" of the wealthy citizens plays a very considerable role in this process.


But this sad story has started not today.


The medical domain was withdrawn in North America (and in other geopolitical regions) from the jurisdiction of democratic rules, norms and freedoms, and became the opposite to the First Amendment and all democratic principles. Any criticism of doctors, hospitals, or medical system in general is not welcomed, not allowed, or suppressed; all materials about medical crimes are strictly censored; an easy access to books, media coverage, or discourse concerning medical malpractice was made tightly restricted; American search engines virtually conceal links to such materials, as well as to organizations, which goal is to protect patients. Doctors were made not accountable, not under jurisdiction of civil or criminal law. Lawsuits against doctors became almost impossible.


Such an impunity, such an exemption from the law has created a precedent, which contributed to all further exemptions: freeing bureaucrats, CEOs (see: British, American, and Canadian DPA law), enforcement agencies, and many other categories from criminal liability. And this, in its turn, paved the way to an enormous inmates' population, to private prisons and slave labor, tortures, and other war crimes, and crimes against humanity. Secrecy, which surrounds lawsuits against medical doctors, medical documents, and names of those, who committed medical crimes, is just astonishing; it is a tracing-paper from the principles of the functioning of the totalitarian regimes.


While bad doctors are usually immune to any lawsuits, best doctors are frequently punished for disregarding petty regalements, when making heroic efforts to cope with the overcrowded emergency rooms, or helping socially deprived patients to survive.


The medical circles have developed their own non-official corporate code, which forces any MD to cover up colleagues' mistakes or even crimes, for the cost of patient's health or even life. Medical laboratories and other diagnostic facilities are also participants in this scheme, destroying or altering medical results. This mafia-style mutual responsibility and cover up is the most abominable practice within Canadian health care society, which not just secures their impunity, but gives them an unfairly huge sociopolitical influence and power over public figures and politicians.


So, not just the ordinary folk, but also the corporate elite, politicians and militaries, and medical professionals themselves are imprisoned within a dysfunctional, mismanaged, and irresponsible medical system, even if Canadian health care system was (still in 1990-s) one of the best in the world. And, theoretically, the most influential foreign theocracies and rogue states may have a perfect opportunity to seize Canadian ruling class by a throat, taking advantage of this abnormal dependence. Without their frenzied pressure, Canadian foreign policy could be completely different, and protection of the environment: more efficient.


However, I am advocating not only for patients, but also for medical doctors for few obvious reasons.


1. The vast majority of doctors, whom I met, used to be good people, and I am in an irredeemable duty at them for all they did for me.

2. I believe that doctors have the right for a mistake (if this is an involuntary mistake, and not a purposeful crime (or an action (inaction), provoked by their greed or money-making thirst).

3. Medical profession is difficult, demanding lot of knowledge, responsibility, many years (or everlasting) of studies, and associated (for many of doctors and nurses) with very stressful and hard tasks. Under-subsidized, mismanaged, and overcrowded medical service brings a traumatizing experience not only for patients, but also for doctors and nurses, great number of whom become depressed, fatigued, burned out at work, working compulsory extra hours, and underpaid.

4. If the medical professionals work under the pressure of fear, it could affect their performance, having a negative impact on patients" safety.


Unfortunately, the protection of doctors doesn't work, and, while notorious medical criminals get away with crimes they committed, good doctors are experiencing all kinds of upsets, having unfair treatment for minor mistakes and oversights, and all kind of avoidable problems.


So, the exemption from the liability doesn"t serve them a stand in good stead, but, on the contrary, make them just more defenseless and unprotected from intrigues of their vicious colleagues and patients.


3


The rapid polarization of views and opinions, and growing hostility between representatives of different ethnic, religious, political, and other groups is putting at risk patients' safety. If a representative of one particular ethnic, ideological, or other group (a patient), is getting to the hands of a very hostile and very angry representative of an opposite group (a doctor): a tragic incident is very near. Mass surveillance, hidden censorship, and the transformation of former democratic countries into police states does not prevent this from happening, but instigates more radicalization and hostility. Dehumanization of domestic affairs and aggressive foreign policy is bringing us to the dehumanization of all spheres-aspects of life, including the health care.


This situation gives an advantage just to extremists' radical groups, which are using help of "their own", always the same "checked" doctors, who, assumingly, share their views. Such doctors may not be the best choice for some of the categories of patients.


All other people, not united into such organized groups, are at greater risk today than in the past decades.


Another danger is represented by doctors, who hold the citizenship (or a potential citizenship) of militarized theocratic states, which just formally calling themselves "democracies", while forbidding civil marriages, religious freedom, and many other civil liberties, notoriously suppressing human rights and committing war crimes on everyday bases. Compulsory military service makes all of them permanent army officers, who must obey their commanders' orders. If they refuse, they could be persecuted, or their close ones might be targeted. This is a classic manifestation of legally defined conflict of interests. What comes first: their loyalty to the patient and patient"s health - or an order of their army colonel? What - if in their country - some of their Canadian patients are considered "politically dangerous" - if not the enemies of the state, and, among them - someone very disliked?


Double loyalty (to the "national state" and to Canada) and the military oath put them in a very shaky position. (We should not forget that they could be complicit into war crimes).


Unfortunately, they have a disproportionally high representation in Canadian health care system.


This problem has no solution. These doctors are working at almost all hospitals in the developed countries, and most of them are good professionals and honest, decent people, who do everything possible and impossible to help ANY patient. Many of them contributed to the development of academic medical science and medical technologies. And, besides, it is not their fault, that - against their will - or even without their permission - their ominous compatriots-sharks are in a position to use and manipulate them.


While the professionalism of immigrant doctors does not cause doubts, people from theocratic, autocratic, and totalitarian (or pseudo-democratic) states are less resistant to foreign governments' (or secret services') pressure. And, if so, they may agree for a compromise that can be potentially harmful for their patients.


However, last generations of native-born Canadians are even more vulnerable, and ready to do whatever they are told to do, just keeping their job and their socioeconomic status, as Canadian moral values became corrupted during the Harper-Trudeau era.


The demolition of the universal accessible health care system by the ruling elite is causing now more and more problems for themselves as well, partially because of the rapid growth of population, while an "average Canadian" is aging. The rulers tried to compensate it by mass immigration, which is now under fire from right-wing partisans, but the truth contradicts their claims and ideas. The number of native-born Canadians in 2-3 (or more) generations of all ethnic backgrounds (including white Canadians) is shrinking, first of all, because of the antinational policy of all governments. How can mothers give birth to more children, if any necessity for a child (including clothes, bed, and carriage) costs a fortune; the cost of living jumps up to the Moon, and women in labor must drive up to 300 km to a hospital, because their local hospitals closed the maternity departments? No access to family doctors; the catastrophic situation in first aid institutions (including Emergency Rooms); and doctors' failure to treat smaller problems in their patients - result in mass complications, serious illnesses, and deaths of young people. (The social crises and - related to it - drugs' problems kill a considerable part of young Canadians, as well as so-called "housing crisis" - also artificially created by the ruling elite).


South of Canadian border the situation is even worse. Thousands (if not millions) are becoming disable, terminally ill, or dying just because they don"t have a medical insurance; thousands of diabetic patients are dying because they have no money for diabetic therapy. And the whole list of horrible signs of dehumanization of the medical system could rich a size of a solid novelistic volume.


Crazy, angry, reckless people are having more and more influence, gaining a dominant role in our societies. Asked by interviewers and researchers, why they support aggressive radicals and reactionaries, and vote for them, while suffering from the left-wing and right-wing extremists' policy against the essential needs of low-income classes, and even dying because of left and right-wing politicians' rejection of an accessible health-care, such people respond that they prefer to starve or die (without medical help), but not to allow immigrants or those on welfare to benefit from civilized social programs and human approach. So, if dying can harm other people, such moral freaks are ready to pay with their own lives for bringing misfortune to others.


Individuals, who were devastated by hurricanes, tornados, and other natural disasters, and who believe that they are victims of climate change, vote for extremists, which deny protection to our Mother-Earth, and desire just to exploit it. Why? Because they want to harm others.


What really matters are not the demographic numbers, but the protection of European identity and our genetic heritage. And same high-ranking extremists and racists are in reality relatives of an ethnic group, which aspire to destroy the Christian identity, European cultural heritage, and to wipe out (physically!) all Europeans. They support the most sadistic, bloodthirsty antichristian theocracies, in the same time ruining and destroying moderate and secular non-Christian regimes. The same policy is carried out against the traditional Islam and Buddhism by the same forces that want to destroy the Christian tradition. Hidden Satanic cults' adepts and other sectorial groups are fueling this extreme polarization: to divide us and to prevent us from being united in our struggle for our better future.


Only together, we (people of all origins, skin colors, and countries) can find solutions to our common problems, and survive in today's more hostile world. And those, who are promoting cruel, inhuman, aggressive actions - allegedly, "to protect the white race": are just predators, whose real goals are to divide people for destroying any resistance to their neofeudal order. They (both conservators and liberals) have created an ominous world of mass surveillance, zombie population with smartphones on shoulders instead of heads, aggressive man-haters (whose militant activism is just a cover of their sadistic personality), ban on any criticism of the most powerful North-American lobby and it's so called double loyalty, complete elimination of privacy, and fear of criminal persecution for natural innocent actions. They created a situation when young white boys are not ready for a physical contact because they are completely consumed by mobile phones and afraid of starting any relationship for the reasons listed above. The fury feminists with their set-up cases against young males sent such fear and terror into young boys' hearts that they are afraid now even to look at their coeval girls.


While the abuse of women and girls, and sexual crimes are posing today the same problem in Canada for 90 percent of the ordinary persons, and females are suffering in 2020-s as they suffered before, the ardent feminists are not interested in restoring safety and justice for normal average people, they are addicted by the high-profile cases and by intimidating ALL men.


The "extinction of the white race" became an issue not because the walls to stop "illegal immigrants" are not built, but because the wall between the rich and the poor, the wall of social inequality, the wall of injustice and dehumanization has reached to the sky. And the waves of "illegal immigrants" flooded North America and Europe because - on the request of one Middle Eastern theocracy and its almighty lobby in UK and America - the whole Middle East and North Africa is devastated, the worse humanitarian crises after the World War II emerged, and other millions of human beings were uprooted by the policy of bloody puppet regimes, which the North American Empire put instead of South American people's elected governments, and because of the sanctions and interventions into these countries' internal affairs. You cannot stop ethnic and linguistic shift (caused by massive migration) while maintaining a bold policy of aggression, intimidation, and dominance, and aspiration for brain drain and cheap slave labor of prisoners and migrants, instead of paying fairly your own fellow citizens.


4


The health care is one of the most pivotal factors, which contribute to North American mass immigration policy. When patients cannot afford buying medications, they return to the doctor again and again with the same problem, and - in the meantime - their health drastically worsens. When the results of radiology and other tests are "corrected" regarding of social status and wealth of the patient (because a poor patient will not be able to follow the treatment or pay for additional tests, or buy the right medications), patient"s health may be completely ruined by complications of an untreated illness. When millions of Canadian citizens have no family doctor, or millions of USA citizens have no access to health care at all (because they don"t have a medical insurance plan): these people come faster and faster to the end of their life, and the rulers must "replace" them by immigrants or migrants.


The rulers and the ruling class: they know very well that by providing a fair and equal medical treatment to less privileged they may save enormous resources, but they don't care about the national state budget, because they don't want to see welfare recipients or underpaid workers in the same satisfactory state of health as they are themselves. What, if someone with a low income will benefit from having a free time and adequate medical help, and a businessman, who's extremely busy and occupied, will age faster? We have no statistics on the gap between the life span of very wealthy - and underpaid people, but it is clear that the life expectancy inequality is dramatically growing. Consequently, the ruling class and its representatives are forced to import as many new immigrants into the country, as many of their own compatriots are killed for the sake of the masters' egoistic ambitions and carefree existence: to compensate the manpower losses.


The same applies to so-called "opioid crises". Sore rental and housing prices, homelessness and other social issues, prostration due to further dehumanization of North American societies, and spreading of wrong, harmful values (like the cult of pleasure, or success for any cost) - stimulate narcotics consumption on wider and wider scale, and the cities with the worse and more bizarre housing crises have more addicts than other cities all together. Thousands of young people are dying from the overdoses each year, and hundreds or thousands of survivors become vegetative handicaps after a brain injury associated with an overdose.


Now, there are plans to kill those survivors through so-called euthanasia, or by other means. A nightmare future - presented in science-fiction books 30-40 years ago - is becoming real. Old, sick, disabled, homeless, drug addicts, released from prisons inmates, and some other categories of people might be eliminated already in the coming years. And the solution for the opioid crises is not "safe drugs" or "safe injection (consumption)", but affordable housing and other human conditions and attitudes.


Those, who pretend to care about the "white race extinction", while killing millions of white people by denying them essential needs, medical help, healthy environment, and social justice: are liars, whose goals are completely opposite to what they pretend. And an inhuman treatment, which they demonstrate towards so-called "people of color", immigrants and migrants, and asylum seekers: uncover their true face. Those, who treat "non-white" people with cruelty just cannot be good for white Europeans (whom they derisively-deliberately call "Caucasians") as well.


Among the factors that triggered the dehumanization of medical aid is migrants' inaccessibility to medical help, which creates a precedent, and generates inhuman treatment as an acceptable practice.


These (just few of hundreds) alarming controversies and conflicts - illustrate how profoundly the health care became a highly politicized issue, used for political purposes and goals by bold, reckless, irresponsible, greedy, aggressive, envious, and driven by hatred people. Such individuals, gaining more dominance as family, domestic, corporate, academic, professional, financial, and political leaders, and having no ethical and moral reference points, are slowly transforming the health care from a humanitarian missionary designation (and service) into a weapon designated to punish, harm, and kill human beings.


However, the environment, citizens' health, education, and social protection are the most precious national treasures, and the states, which destroy them - destroy themselves.


5


Canada was longer immune to this inhuman trend, and even under the Harper's governance preserved its human face. But Canadian borders are not iron curtains, and cannot isolate this country from the disastrous global tendencies. "Bad guys" are building here their evil neofeudal fortress from outside, supporting interprovincial right-wing and left-wing extremists' brotherhood, pushing liberals to transform the progressive positive ideas into their most absurd form (into a caricature), radicalizing voters, segmenting population into hostile irreconcilable groups, and privatizing the health care. Bridges will fall and smash cars, killing people more often; airplanes and trains will crash more frequently; the bureaucratic mayhem will expand to the sky: delaying essential documents' processing, pushing people to wait days and nights in line for simple bureaucratic procedures; and all kind of disasters and incidents will double and triple not only because of the climate change, but - first of all - because the whistleblowers are muzzled, independent press is destroyed, and any criticism is not tolerated any more. This is as destructive to medical services as it is destructive to anything else.


Canada is also struggling with the defection of Canadian doctors and nurses to south of the border for Big Bucks, trying not to provoke them to run away by shielding them from lawsuits. However, the shortage of doctors, and the tragic limbo, in which millions of patients have found themselves, could be resolved by providing a choice of free or inexpensive university education for medical specialists, in exchange of an obligation to stay and work in Canada for, say, at least, 30 years.


And, finally: for the descendants of European nations, the medical domain was always not a "service", but a mission. However, the antichristian policy of European and North American governments, and a crusade again the Church in Canada (La Révolution Tranquille, etc.), accompanied by demolition of hundreds (or even thousands) of magnificent churches (priceless splendid objects of great artistic, architectural, and historical value) in Montreal only, had a very negative impact on medical care. State hospitals were turned into a kind of secular temples, in opposition to the Church. Medical help, provided by monks and nuns, and the role of Church as a source of spiritual guide - was removed, and the most vulnerable among the patients are squeezed between social inequality - and inequality in obtaining the medical help.


Thus, the Canadian health care crisis is a complex problem, deeply connected to global negative tendencies and retreat from progressive socio-evolutional achievements, back - to the advance of neofeudalism towards new Dark Ages. This health system crisis is a fertile ground for implementation of the "punitive medicine", or, in other words, for the usage of health care as a tool for arbitrary and politically / ideologically motivated punishment of dissidents and all objectionable persons.


There are two negative influential ideas (or ideologies) behind the present-day health care. They represent two groups of influential partisans, whose moral values are concentrated around their own ego and their egoistic well-being exclusively. Anything that is good for them but bad for others is acceptable.


One group is ready to "accept" the universal health care, but, in "exchange", want to have an opportunity to use the medical system for punishing dissidents and activists, and to shorten life of those, whom they consider a socioeconomic "burden".


Another group has strong roots in medical, academic, and political circles, linked to an inhuman non-official ideology. According to their views and believes, life of modern old-age residents became too long, undermining the immune and genetic protection of the present mankind. "Excessively" extending life expectancy by means of latest medical and pharmacological achievements, we, allegedly, ruin mankind"s health (they claim). Women give birth to children far after 30, sometimes close to 40; men become fathers, when they are almost 60. In result, children are born sick and weak, and this genetic degradation is anchored by generations and accelerated by the same tendency.


(They do not wish to hear that it is the social and economic policy (implemented by same moral freaks) of ugly regimes, which leads to such situation - because to give birth and raise children becomes too expensive and too time-consuming for young people).


"Uncontrolled" - in their opinion - usage of antibiotics leads to emergence and reproduction of thousands of resistant strains menacing the future existence of mankind. Weak and unhealthy individuals, who would live no more than 20 years during former eras, presently supposedly live only at the expense of medical technologies, producing sick posterity and provoking emergence of new resistant bacteria.


(They do not want to hear that such firms as Monsanto, pollution of the environment, drugs, intensive exploitation, and social ulcers generate everything for which they blame something or someone else).


In their opinion, poverty, and haplessness: it is not a social illness, but a genetic constitution of those, who are included into the number of poor and marginalized. Inability to provide, or inability to achieve a considerably high income: this is, allegedly, a congenital genetic "deficiency", and not a product of the monstrous social inequality and crimes of numerous representatives of the prosper classes and ruling circles. Thus, for them - poverty: it is the same illness as birth defects or different congenital diseases, not a virus of our societies, but a malady of social illness' victims. According to this (overturned upside down) concept, an access to medical care extends life of poor people "too much", and makes it "too" good, spreading this "illness" in breadth and depth. It is not excluded that this group of moral freaks is incorporated into the official structures and operates under the cover of any official organization (for example, of hospital sponsor's council, a firm or association, sect or congregation, a cult, etc.).


Paradoxically, such bully offensive ideas get support even among those, against whom they are directed: among low-income workers and welfare recipients; because the criminal-minded ideologists are forming a club of unequal adherents: a pool of absorbed by stronger minds brainwashed intellectual slaves. The same club of brainwashed mental slaves made it possible (in 1910-s) for a bunch of criminal-minded Asians and other nationals and foreigners to capture Russia and turn it into a horrific Stalinist nightmare; the same club of zombies existed in so-called Weimar Republic (pre-Hitler Germany), and contributed to the rise of Nazism.


The "club mentality" is so powerful, because, on one hand, releases the most violent primitive sadistic instincts (which take control over one's personality and represent an easiest way to manipulate the masses); and, on the other hand, it strips a "club" member of any personal responsibility on a narrow and on a broader scale. There is nothing mysterious in the fact that socially deprived and low-income people associate themselves with the richest and wealthiest demagogues, who lead the present global fascist-like neofeudal (extreme left or right) movement, and who are hostile to "low" social classes. It is a comfort to have an illusion that you (a fragile, vulnerable, small person) are protected because you belong to the mob, and in the world, now divided for "us" and for "them", you belong to "us". (All disappointments lay in the future, when you'll be betrayed by those, whom you categorized as "us"). It is also a chimerical relief, when such (suppressed in a "normative" society) emotions (and triggered by them actions) as rage, anger, hatred, aggression, etc. - are released through the "new" "non-normative" rules of the populists and extremists. The most obscure and sinister motives lay behind many of both neoliberal and neoconservative initiatives.


6


The demolition of the public health care in Canada is just a component of the demolition of the former civil society, social consensus, and formal (at least!) bill of rights.


When Hitler's regime gained its ultimate strength, this marked a major shift from the humanistic (by its ideological conception) society to the era of post-humanism. The decision to murder mentally sick people, Gypsies (Roma), Jews, disabled, and other categories of "non-normative" and so-called "social ballast" citizens - has transformed the Nazi regime into an anti-human ogre, which devour its own kids. Unfortunately, the modern regimes have chosen to follow the trail of Hitlerism by adopting the same anti-human paradigm (and even laws), trying to get rid of the very poor; disabled; elderly; addicts; itinerant; sick; ill or disabled children; conscious objectors, and other groups - by physically eliminating them. By cutting an access to medical care for the most vulnerable (and dependent from it), the governments are actually committing the mass murders.


The ruling classes have triggered the health care disaster not because they were facing a "crises" (and refused to address to it in time), but because they WANTED this disaster and PLANNED it).


They destroyed the former, more or less accessible, health care system as an important part of the former castle of the civilized society - which they gradually demolish since the bogus "terrorist acts" in 2001, and replace it by a neo-feudal order.


What we witness today as a destruction of the public health care (hypocritically called by the governments a "crisis") - is just one of the secondary manifestations of the post-humanism age, introduced by the global neofeudal elite since the 1990-s. Other post-humanism era's manifestations include the dramatic pauperization of the population in the richest countries, where a considerable part of citizens are literally starving from hunger; the Covid-pandemic anti-human management and forcible vaccination by the most dangerous and inhuman vaccines; so-called "housing crisis" (the marauder housing prices, imposed by the predator ruling elite, which employed the real estate speculations as one of their main tools of robbing the low-income and middle-class citizens, changing hands of the real estate property ownership, and making of fortunes on nation's misfortune); savage privatization of lands, enterprises, forests, lakes, facilities, buildings, parks, or objects previously resting in public domain; the closure of the real education for the "unprivileged" families; and so on.


It is significant that this reckless, offensive, and insane invasion of all kind of social predators is materializing through an undeclared expropriation of public property. Silently (without any statement or acknowledgement, or admission) parks (or their parts); green zones; parking; municipal, provincial, or federal terrains: are transformed into private lands with private property ownership (condominiums, huge backyards, mansions, recreational places, etc.). While green spaces are needed more than ever to confront the deadly effects of the climate change (the global warming) - they became a playground for most wealthy and rich. Records on such expropriations are erased and blanched, and only the old papers and maps are testifying about this coup d'état.


New huge condominium complexes are devoured what used to be a sidewalk, a street, or an alleyway, or a former green space, or a backyard of a demolished public library, a church, or another public building. They are often built as a caret (square) within the borders of 4 streets (blocks) - with a gate or a wicket in the middle of one or every side, which opens a way into an alley. Such a central alley is typically a former street, expropriated and closed by the construction and bank mafia (the bank mafia is the most influential criminal organization in human history, and, as a rule, stands behind any construction), in conspiracy with a mayor or another bureaucratic official. There is a war on general population, waging by the neofeudal elite clans, which are looting cities that they are taking over. The robbers are destroying churches, public libraries, water pools, clubs, schools, parks, green zones, streets, and other public buildings and spaces, which they turn into condominiums or commercial spaces. Such a shameless predatory practice in disregarding of any national interests, public protests, or objections - is a sign of the present post-democratic societies. Contrary to the purpose of the construction industry, more condominiums and homes just increase the number of homeless people by the geometrical progression. More condominiums are built: more homelessness it creates in the modern bloodthirsty world order.


Before the era of Quebec's Prime Minister Francois Legault and the mayor of Montreal Valerie Plante (she was brought to power by a group of usurpers, who secured for her a fraudulent win by applying serious obstacles for the majority of voters; she was chosen for her incompetence, which guaranteed free hands for the "bad guys") - there were about 10-15 thousand homeless people in Montreal (not more; the estimated number of 18 thousand, in our opinion, was wrong), and now there are (according to an approximate data) more than 100 thousand! Here is where the indescribable sufferings of people and the dissemination of "Covid" is coming from. An artificially provoked outcome of hundreds of thousands of residents of Montreal also generated an apocalyptic nightmare. (This exodus is triggered by the marauder housing prices, but, recognizing that the population of Montreal is declining, the authorities, in the same time, are claiming that the "housing crises", homelessness, and the health care crises: all this is a result of the growing population. Where is the logic?!).


Though the housing prices steadily grew since 2001 (since the "terrorist" attacks 9-11), they jumped up already to the sky since 2018, and the Covid pandemic was additionally used by the ruling elite and banks to inflate the high cost of housing to the space scales. They began to inflate "a soap bubble" just as - one or two decades earlier - the same swindle was fabricated by the American banks in different USA states. But all the provinces of Canada were surpassed by Quebec, where (before the present government) the housing prices were kept below the all-Canadian. Here the housing prices' altitude was so abrupt that would overtake the space rocket, which came off the Earth.


With the marauder inflation of housing prices, the number of homeless people (especially since the beginning of 2010-s) began to grow. In 2015, the number of the homeless people reached 20 thousand in Montreal alone. (Then this number has slightly decreased (temporarily) to 15-16, or even 10 thousands). In all Quebec by then there were about 50 thousand homeless. But, by then, there was a "different" kind of homelessness, because the homeless people (usually) used to receive help, a temporary refuge (in the centers of a room type, or in doss houses), and were gradually settled to rental or social housing, by affordable prices.


With the coming of the full-scale post-humanism era, not only the total number of the homeless began to grow sharply, but also the status of the homeless poor wretches have been changed: now the unfortunate beings are denied any assistance; at traffic lights of the large roads, at traffic intersections - I see every day a huge number of the begging people with terrible injuries and mutilations from the diseases and homelessness: hunched, in crusts, with the affected skin, with muddy red eyes, in rags and shivering from cold. On all streets and in lanes, the hunched poor creatures rummage in ballot boxes, roll before themselves some poor carriage with rags and scraps. There are both elderly people (men and women), and young men and women, who die standing - of diseases and injuries from hunger and homelessness. There are also absolutely young girls and guys, by whom a leg or a hand is already broken and dysfunctional; or an eye came out; or a spine injury happened, making a victim crooked like a 90-old weak elder; but most often the whole bouquet of damages, and it remained them to live some few months.


The majority of them: are white people, indigenous Quebecers, descendants of the French colonists of the 17-th century, and the indigenous Native Americans: 2 groups of people, whose homelessness is the greatest barbaric crime of the federal and the provincial regimes.


It is useless to expect humanism and compassion from the society, which not just allowed, but CREATED such a horror, and the treatment of the homeless people is just a "copy-paste" of the treatment of patients in the medical institutions.


But - from the beginning of the pandemic, - the number of the homeless citizens and the condition of their delayed death (because practically all homeless people in the present situation are doomed to death) reached a scope of the national tragedy. Some official sources claim that now, in 2022, in Montreal alone, the number of the homeless exceeded 100 thousand people (almost as much, as in California - with the incommensurably big population! - despite its wealth, recognized as the world's champion on number of the homeless people; but there - there is no snow, no very frosty winter!). If - before the pandemic - the unfortunates were given the alms, shelters, or some accommodation, - then now nobody helps them. Whether pedestrians and commuters are afraid to catch Covid from them, whether the selfish people consider themselves sufferers of the lockdown, vaccines, job loss, and other misfortunes, and disregard the much greater tragedy of others: who knows?


Proceeding from the fact that the mayor of Montreal - Valérie Plante (who is responsible for the genocide of the homeless and old-age population not less than the federal and provincial governments) - reported about the distribution (during a one-time action) more than 500 thousand masks among the homeless; concluding from the statistics of deaths reported by the philanthropic societies; and, judging by the considerable number of other facts: the number of the homeless citizens in Montreal increased during the period of the rule of the present provincial government from 15 or 20 thousand to 100 thousand people. The vast majority of the homeless: these are white people of the Quebec-French origin, followed, by numbers, by the Amerindian natives (that is, both groups - the descendants of many generations of indigenous people, and throwing them out to the street: it is a manifestation of a boundless injustice and special cruelty).


Any vaccination for the homeless, any REAL help.


A 100 - 150-thousand-great population of the homeless: it is a major threat of the spread of the Covid virus and other infections, but it does not concern the governors; they are only concerned about their personal enrichment and by the violent mandatory vaccination of all others (except the homeless and prisoners) with inoculations, which (as it was cleared already enough) are a biological weapon.


Thanks to compassionate citizens (softening sins of the authorities, banks, construction mafia and murderers-house owners), during the pandemic, there were opened several places in Montreal, where the philanthropic organizations put (almost end-to-end) up to 40-50 beds, for example, in the Complexe Guy-Favreau, or marché Bonsecours, or in the Center d'hébergement de la Petite-Bourgogne. But - in the conditions of such a density - many caught Covid, and some sufferers died - without any resolute aid of federal, provincial and municipal authorities (which artificially created this problem).


7


During the peak of Covid Pandemic, Quebec had a stricter lockdown and totalitarian-style control than any other country on the American continent.


From the very beginning of the pandemic, the government of Quebec imposed (before other provinces) the state of emergency and began to rule by means of decrees, having cancelled the basic democratic principles. Let's remind that by means of decrees Bolsheviks-Leninists ruled in Russia in 1917-1920-s. But one of the points of the state of emergency is the authorities' extra power, which includes a legal ability to requisite rooms for accommodation of the homeless; however, this power was not applied by the authorities! Using the mandate of the state of emergency, the authorities could impose an immediate moratorium on evictions from rental apartments (the vast majority of Canadians live in rental apartments); a moratorium on so-called "renovictions"; a moratorium on rental payment increase, but they did not do it!


Thus, the homeless people were artificially withdrawn from the "lockdown" and placed in the conditions most favorable for the Covid infection contamination.


When, with the approach of the warm weather, hundreds of thousands of people poured out to the streets and rushed in the subway, they inevitably faced the homeless, and inevitably caught Covid.


However, the greatest number of the homeless people was killed during the action of the curfew, when the Quebec authorities forbade leaving home after 20:30. No logical sense in a curfew existed. On the contrary, it only promoted the spread of the infection, creating a real chaos on the streets and in the shops, when the whole population rushed buying products to manage to make it after work in limited hours, and the time of waiting in lines has trebled because of the health regulations and so-called "social distance".


But how about folk, who have no house, no roof over the head? Though they had no place to go, no exception was made for them; they were hunted by police, fined, thrown into jails with the most dreadful conditions; isolated from their usual shelters and from the places where they could be fed or where they could get though some scraps.


Such crimes against humanity, committed by all levels of governments, is a best illustration that the salvation of the deprived people - of the sick, homeless, elderly, disabled, poor, low income families, fresh immigrants, hereditary low-class Quebecers, native Americans (indigenous), dissidents, former prisoners, mentally ill, addicts, discriminated, most intensively exploited: in their own hands; that the government gives no hope for survival.


It is the most paradoxical that the police officers, who treated the homeless relatively humanly, were the most civilized. Otherwise, in every month of the curfew, not hundreds, but tens of thousands of the homeless would perish.


During the term of the 2 last provincial governments (the present and the previous), the record number of the historical architecture's sites was demolished; the last remains of European historical architectural heritage - beyond the borders of the Old City (and even the Old City of Montreal was subjected to the barbarian nivelation and destruction) - was ruined; and everything else that remained from the past is destroyed now. Dozens of kilometers of faceless inhabited towers built on the place of (now ruined) unique, great, shaking imagination historical architecture, having destroyed a distinctive appearance of Montreal already forever. This huge number of new housing unites arose along with the incredible growth of homelessness. A Paradox? Absurdity? Only in the last 5 years, according to the most conservative estimations, there were 240-320 thousand very expensive new apartments built in recently constructed condominiums and new private houses in Montreal. Expensive construction technologies, expensive main and finishing materials were used for construction of the majority of these apartments. (We don't count, in addition, an impressive number of completely reconstructed, renovated, and updated apartment buildings, from where all residents were evicted by force before the repairs). And the crowd of the homeless population for the same time-span increased from 14-20 thousand to 100 (and more) thousands of the unfortunates. Plus, this happens despite the fact that the population of Montreal is steadily reducing.


This antinational genocidal policy is applied when billions of dollars are spent for crazy and irresponsible projects domestically and abroad; and when banks, big corporations, and the richest individuals - doubled and tripled their profit!


8


Our research proves that the Canadian authorities, as well as the authorities of other countries, are covertly satisfied by the mass infections by Covid-19 virus, and their "measures" "against the pandemic" - is just a cynical performance. For example, from the very beginning of the pandemic, the authorities had to adopt - IMMEDIATELY - the law on a severance pay due to illness (sick days' payment note), which is not supported by a universal law in Canada (in December 2021, the federal authorities only "feigned" such a resolution, but - in practice - it was not adopted to become universal and obligatory). The workers, who caught Covid, are forced to go to work (infecting others); otherwise, the employers will fire them, or they will not be able to support themselves and their families. A moratorium on residents' evictions (in connection with the pandemic), neither a reductions of the whole army of the homeless, nor a real restoration of the public health care system (destroyed by the government): nothing was done. And such examples of intentional sabotage and diversions - is a dime a dozen.


On one hand, the Covid pandemic is a handy tool for them for further demolition of democratic rules, civil liberties, rights and freedoms, while through ruling by mandates - as the Bolsheviks did - they have an opportunity to do so; on the other hand, they need the pandemic to crash the resistance to the mRNK Covid-vaccines, as - terrorizing the population - it is easier to brake the opposition to uncountable and infinite inoculations with Moderna and Pfizer poisons.


While the Anglo-American vaccines against the virus not only do not protect people adequately (and those, who got the inoculations - all the same catch Covid, infect each other - and many of them have a serious illness), Moderna and Pfizer - besides - are very dangerous. But, at the same time, Quebec's Medicago vaccine is safe and based on natural plant ingredients.


However, the World Health Organization (WHO), American and Canadian governments, and Quebec authorities have literally suffocated the Medicago project and destroyed it. Why? For what reason? Actually, they destroyed Medicago to pave the way for Moderna and Pfizer, for the only reason that Covid-19 (SARS-CoV-2), and the Anglo-American mRNK Covid-vaccine is a multi-type biological weapons, by means of which the dark forces - standing behind its development - aim to carry out their plans (by all means).


The transformation of the former so-called "free societies" into the autocratic tyrannies and the elimination of people's rights to protest (which perfectly illustrates Trudeau's regime's violent raid against the Freedom Convoy) - have enabled the centralized mass medical experiments, forcibly imposed by the states, like this violent forcible mass inoculation by the EXPERIMENTAL Moderna and Pfizer Covid-vaccines.


Such a totalitarian practice opens a door for the following sinister possibilities:


1) to conduct a global experiment involving the whole mankind;

2) to get rid of so-called "social ballast" (tenth of thousands of old-age citizens were killed in the nursing homes only in Quebec alone during the pandemic);

3) to reduce the population, especially in the overpopulated regions in the South Hemisphere;

4) to alter the human genetic code;

5) to destroy citizens' natural immunity, having put people into a complete dependence on the state vaccines;

6) to insert into the vaccinated people (together with the vaccine) some tracking and spying verifiers, and other nanorobotics for different goals (this - theoretically - is perfectly possible for the modern technologies);

7) to collect a research data for the future program of citizens' division into 2 different biological races: a race of slaves (90 percent of the world population) and a race of masters (5-10 percent). There are serious fears that such experiment is ALREADY introduced within the present company of the compulsory vaccination, though in limited scales.


Having cancelled the universal norm (principle) of the inviolability of the human body and having created new norms through the compulsory vaccination, the governments provoked a sinister precedent allowing to conduct now any manned experiments; to implant - forcibly - any devices into living human beings (including the brain implants); and to do any dreadful manipulations with human body, with human genetic code, and with the society in general.


They also use vaccination for planting of so-called "vaccine passports", which are nothing else, but an external "chip" forced to each human being, just so far not physically inserted into the human body (it is only a matter of time!). With the "vaccine (electronic) passport" (which is not only limiting the right of movement and finally taking away completely any anonymity and "privacy"), each person is transformed into a fully traced and controlled mechanism, or a computer file - that equates humans to a lifeless object. Exaggerated (fictitious) "fight against the pandemic", compulsory inoculations and cancellation of fundamental citizens' rights and freedoms are necessary also for the implementation of such a "chip".


The incontestable scientific proof of the presence of oxide of graphene and other foreign substances and devices in Anglo-American vaccines is also widely known.


A recent comprehensive research, performed in the Laval University (Big Montreal) provides a proof that both Covid-19 virus (SARS-CoV-2), and the Anglo-American mRNK Covid-vaccines Moderna and Pfizer - can change person's genetic code and behavior.


9


This extended overview is needed to show that the almost complete demolition of the system of the public health care is the product of the post-humanism era, which not needs the accessible public health-care by definition. The civil societies are invaded by human predators (this is a tracing-paper of what happened in Russia and in former Soviet republics after 1991).


This is an aggression of the anti-human invaders from within of the human cultures, an aggression, which, as almost any occupation and colonization, destroys the occupied land, previous laws, occupied peoples' way of life, etc.


The aggressors are robbing the occupied population; they expropriate and misappropriate lands, forests, public property, and anything else without any excuse.


And, hence! that's what we see here, in Quebec, and in Canada.


Forests and non-inhabited rural lands are divided between neofeudals, leaving the ordinary people without any access to the nature. The vast majority of citizens became prisoners in their cities, watched by mass surveillance 24 hours a day like the inmates, and totally deprived of the rights for privacy and solitude, and possibility to be alone in a forest or in a field. In Manitoba, Saskatchewan, or Alberta aggressive angry farmers are illegally patrolling rural (and sometimes not only rural) roads in huge jeeps or mini-tracks, intimidating every traveler or stranger, and terrorizing the indigenous population with the full support of the local police. There were rumors that - threatening them by gun - they used to force indigenous people into farmers' own cars, and could shoot them (under a pretext of a car theft attempt): if not a sudden appearance of witnesses.


Indigenous population is imprisoned within the small local communities, unable to go out safely to a local town or city; unable to pay a visit to a doctor; their children cannot go swimming, to take a bicycle - and go somewhere; to have friends outside of a narrow neighborhood.


And the forests are burning not only because of the climate change, but also because of the closure of the access to the general public. It is a deceptive concept that, allegedly, such an access would endanger the forests, while - in reality - the witnesses would guard the safety of the forests by watching, intervening, complaining, or reporting the wrongdoing of individuals or companies.


Neoliberal and neoconservative ideology is just a cover screen of hidden neo-heathenish agenda. The whole societal development was relatively seized by the ideology of the financial and corporate elite's lunatics. We will not touch a suggestion that the most powerful and influential political, financial and non-political social circles are led by adepts of the satanic cults and secret societies, but we will dispute the "official" doctrine that, allegedly, the wealth, success, and influence are acquired through the "economic" laws and the "free marker" "capitalism", while, in reality, the whole power, wealth, and influence are distributed by a club of the ideological adherents, who control the economic levers. Some of the neo-satanic movements emerge from within the traditional religions, like formally Christian or Judaic sects, or Jewish masonic lodges, or Muslim extremist organizations, trying to impose (with an unstoppable fanatical obstinacy) THEIR profane version of Islam, Christianity, or Talmudic cult on all Canadian citizens. They do everything to undermine and destroy 3 global traditional religions: Buddhism, Christianity, and Islam. Mass demolitions of churches, and widespread repressions against Christian clergy; anti-Christian propaganda and Islamophobia; and steady ideological demarches against the growing influence of Buddhism - are landmarks of this new political landscape.


Ecstatic sensual music and cruel, sadistic computer games; offensive norms of political and other rhetoric; offensive radio hosts' behavior; and other forms of the replacement of the creativity and spirituality by dull, ecstatic forms of expression and norms - are imposed by well-coordinated partisans.


While - in the past - a humanitarian approach was a norm (at least as a façade), the cruelty, and inhuman treatment are becoming a widely accepted practice at the present time.


The most vulnerable and suffering groups - like the indigenous population, refugees and displaced people, children, elderly, and subjects of war crimes, criminal mayhem, and tortures: are targeted with an unprecedented cruelty by lawmakers and politicians.


The demolition of the public health care, and other, above mentioned, trends: it is a part of the neo-feudalist and Satanist global coup, as I predicted more than 30 years ago in the last part of my Second Trilogy ("The Show"). The modern despots and tyrants, whose desire to declare themselves kings and emperors, and gods - is just a matter of time (the ruler of one "very democratic" pseudo-state is already posing under a pseudonym after one of the Biblical kings), and all smaller despots placed in the commanding positions on all levels of the social hierarchy, are seeing themselves not just as leaders and privileged big fishes, but also as gurus and deities, who perceive only themselves as autonomous individuals, but all other public (for them) is just a faceless mass, subjected to mass surveillance, inhuman treatment, and deprivation of rights. And the trickiest thing is that, when the privacy protection fails, it triggers the failure of all rights' protection in a chain reaction.


I must specially underline the issues with the Google search engine.


Experiencing troubles with its database's access, in 2005, I wrote a letter to Google's administration, describing my difficulties.


Soon I received a response, which, among other topics, included very useful (and friendly) recommendations and listed the appropriate tests. First of all, the tests (recommended by Google) showed me that often problems, which occurred, were not with Google, but with the intermediate bodies - like my Internet provider, local BELL authorities, etc., who - actually - blocked my access to Google. A second suggestion assumes that Google is a democratic and user-friendly corporation, because my similar letter to Amazon, Vimeo, Yandex, Facebook, Instagram, Twitter (before it was overtaken by Elon Musk), etc. - were completely ignores. Another conclusion suggests that some persons inside Google's senior personalities might be sympathetic to certain of my views, or, in particular, the defend of the sovereignty of the national states (contrary to so-called "Global Government's Power"), and my adoration of national patriots, including American patriots (whose collective image was displayed in Gipson's film "The Patriot"), who withstand the recapturing of the United States by the British Empire. When I had issues with YouTube (2014), my letters also were taken seriously, and all issues were fixed and solved quickly. It contrasted the policy of Vimeo and Instagram, which just ignored my complaints, and never responded.


The right to be alone, not under surveillance and not in sight of others 24 hours a day, is one of the most fundamental human rights, positioning next to the right to live. Its second form is the anonymity. Every person has a right to walk in the street, buy a train ticket, and enter a public space without showing an ID (passport). The police and guards are violating this right everywhere, from Moscow to New York, while the surveillance technology with face recognition is the same as a demand to show your ID. Within the Internet or Smartphone environment the privacy and the right to be alone is called anonymity. Anonymous browsing is a fundamental human right, but Facebook or the search engines like Yandex, Yahoo, or Google shut you down if you're using private browsing or the copy-past method (refusing to compromise your typing style). Big stores, which - by logic - must be interested in more sells: are not allowing you to browse their pages, if you open them in the "private browsing regime". Do they don't need more customers? Or they make more money on spying on people than selling the goods? Newspapers will chase you away - until you de-mask your location, and allow an access to your microphone and camera.


The right to be alive, which is the most fundamental right, without which all other basic human rights do not make any sense, cannot be guaranteed without the right for an unrestricted access to health care. This is why we are speaking about all presented above issues. And these all most basic, most fundamental rights (the rights to be alive, the right to get the medical help, and the right to be alone (not watches; not surveilled) and anonymous): are interpolated and interdepending, and, violating one of them, the governments automatically "cancel" all other rights and freedoms. The public health care is neglected, demolished, and destroyed just because the right to be alive, and the right to be alone: are "cancelled".


By questioning and investigating the social media giants, the governments don't care about the privacy of ordinary people and their safety. They just pretend to do so. In reality, they only concerned about themselves. However, their OWN interests cannot be protected in combination with the increasingly totalitarian censorship and surveillance, which they actually demand from the social networks. Trying to comply with the demands of the governments, Facebook is massively closing so-called "fake accounts". But 99 percent of so-called "fake accounts" are not tools of the "foreign agents", but the accounts of ordinary people, who just want to be left alone. However, the governments DON"t WANT to understand that - by massively closing the "fake accounts" and forcing customers to reveal their real identity - Facebook's true foreign agent Mark Zuckerberg is getting a matchlessly bigger opportunity to manipulate Canadian public opinion in the interests of three foreign governments and the sinister irrational forces behind them.


In the similar way, Ontario's present premier (who, by the way, did many positive things, but, unfortunately, also undertook a number of regrettable actions), Dug Ford, and people like him in the city council of Toronto, are not capable to understand that - approving a project like Frontline housing project (Quayside and IDEA District or "smart city") - they are digging their own grave.


This sinister project is a revival of the "forgotten" Aware Home, a dream of an early "information age". By then, a home comfort, combined with the computing technologies, was seen as human-home mixture of data, combining preloaded and flowing from wearable devices personal information, and information from home environmental sensors. A term "ubiquitous computing" emerged. Even by then, a massive controversy of unethical questions arose. However, Aware Home was thought as a strictly private shelter with a "closed circuit", or "closed loop", which prevented personal data from being leaked to the outside world, and all rights for this data and knowledge - were reserved exclusively for people, who lived there.


Next stage of the mutation of the primary idea emerged as testing of all kind of "ubiquitous" principles in theocratic states, proto-totalitarian or totalitarian countries (or colonies) [like South Korea, or Saudi Arabia], outside of the Western World. On this stage, a sensitive part of the private data was appropriated by governments and corporations, which did not explain or reveal how they going to use it. An Orwellian surrealistic nightmare was born.


Billions of surveillance cameras, at any spot of urban streets, public places, and so on, web cameras, smartphones, and other spying devices, Internet applications, search engines and social networks hosted by ICQ, Microsoft, AOL, Facebook, Google, Amazon, etc., and systems like Alphabet, Alexa, Thermostat, etc. - practically eliminated any aspect of privacy, reducing the whole population of modern cities to prison mates, watched 24 hours a day. Canada was made a testing lab for such inhuman experiments, as in the 1950-s and 1960-s Canada served as a testing ground for inhuman CIA psychiatric experiments (crimes against humanity), led by the notorious criminal, professor Cameron.


Some authors explain this horrific reality as a "surveillance marketing", or a "surveillance economy", with a reference to capitalism, but I don't buy it. The real mechanism of shaping up this horror realm is different. It is a mixture of next vital elements: a) industry's escape from the Western Civilization to oriental countries with near-slave labor and very low humanitarian norms; b) drastic shift of wealth, power, and influence concentration from productive industries to non-productive parasitic branches like banks and other financial institutions, marketing and insurance firms, and Internet-based manipulators; and c) the next stage, when the concentration of wealth and power drifted to so-called security sphere and the enforcement agencies.


After decades of profiting from the extensive exploitation and slavery at their enterprises in the underdeveloped countries, the moral freaks started to implement slavery and deprivation of rights at home, in all parts of Europe (including Russia) and North America, destroying all achievements that working people won during centuries of their fierce and bloody struggle. And, finally, virtual prisons - within the premises of each city and rural areas - were established, with a mixture of 1) totalitarian video surveillance and elimination of privacy, 2) computerized enormous personal data accumulation, 3) profiling, 4) spying on prisoners (cities' and villages' population), 5) police-state regime, 6) AI and facial recognition technology, 7) draconian laws and bylaws, tyrannical censorship and elimination of all constructive critics and opposition, and shutdown of the freedom of speech, 8) persecution of dissidents and activists, 9) despotic control over everything that people say, think, do, send by emails, etc., 10) and so on.


Another push in dehumanizing humans gave the last generations of computer games, combining sadistic cruelty, luck of elementary ethics, and hidden psychological manipulations with the players (while the players are thinking that they are manipulating the dolls). Online games became a real Klondike for the Masters, who extorted the behavioral data from the players, and have learned how to manipulate them. And, by the way, this is how Facebook emerged from the Hell.


When I hear that AI and surveillance marketing are simply treating customers as a raw material for information and knowledge extortion, I argue that they merely treat human beings as slaves in the very ancient sense, while applying - to them - laws of the modern digital universe. Thus, it diminished humans to robots and computer files, not just depriving them of privacy, autonomy, and anonymity, but also putting them on automation as elements of computer applications. With essential personal data and control accumulation in the hands of Evil, human behavior becomes astonishingly predictable, and such behavioral patterns (converted into mathematical algorithms and models) enable for Masters the "automation" of human beings, operating them as depersonalized robotic elements.


10


To illustrate - what can be done with these behavioral patterns like your individual walking manner and body movement, - it's enough to notice that an AI algorithm can identify you in CCTV footage while even not employing the face recognition systems. This is just another example how humans are already becoming equal to computer files deprived of all rights.


Naturally, the computer files (like personages in the computer games) don't need any privacy not only in the streets or shopping malls; they don't have rights now for any privacy at home as well. Our reality was already transformed into the virtual reality, in which puppets' homes are just virtual homes, which can be watched, invaded, or controlled by Masters, with everything that we do in our homes, leaving no exceptions for toilet, bedroom, or sex. Mobil phones, street cameras, laptops' cameras, and other devices are already registering every minute of our human activity, leaving not a single second for our private life. However, even this is all the same not enough for the Masters. They want to implant their eyes and sensors into homes' walls, floors' and ceilings, into household appliances, regulatory devices, and lockers. Our computers, phones, scanners, printers, TV"s, etc. - are already spying on us, but the Masters want that the kitchen stoves, refrigerators, and washing machines should also spy on us, together with the toilet bowl or shower. They tested this technology in South Korea, and other places in Asia, Africa, and South America, and now they want to bring them to Toronto, Vancouver, and Montreal.


Going back to Toronto's Frontline projects (the Quayside and IDEA District), we must recall the 1-st Waterfront enterprise, which was adopted in Harper's era (2014), with an involvement or participation of Community Police Liaison Committee CPLC 51 Division. It was called "Waterfront affordable housing development". This project already included the elevated surveillance and other violations of privacy. No wonder that the next phase has started under the conservative government of Dug Ford (despite all his positive social and other achievements). A Google's parent company - the Alphabet subsidiary - Sidewalk Labs - received a green light to redevelop 12 acres of Toronto's industrial waterfront. Alphabet's CEO and Zukerman's compatriot, Dan Doktorow, called the project "the most innovative district in the entire world." However, their "innovations" include an "innovative" approach to human beings as to an element of design and technology, denying their human nature and inalienable right to own their personal information as an inseparable part of an individual personality, which cannot be appropriated by someone else.


The Waterfront Toronto chairman, Stephen Diamond, called the proposal of the IDEA District a dangerous precedent:


"Sidewalk Labs's plan to create an independent "urban data trust" to collect and share personal data - an issue which has moved to the forefront since the project was first proposed in 2016 - may be potentially at odds with existing privacy laws".


"These concerns are shared by Block Sidewalk, a local opposition group which calls the plan an "aggressive corporate takeover of public land, public process, public services, and public funds.". (...) "If the plan was actually good for Toronto, "the statement reads, "there would be no need for a massive PR and lobbying campaign." (Alissa Walker for Curbed news, Vox Media).


When the Internet-based corporations that monopolized search, game and social networks, publishing and marketing, etc., and employed the artificial intelligence (AI) to extort personal information for conversion into behavioral data and to load it into programmable machine processes, which can predict our behavior, and (as I stressed around 10 years ago in my works "Matrix a la Canada" and "In the Matrix Belly") modify it without our consent and without our knowledge, were permitted to move into the production of the offensive hardware technologies for combat, intelligence missions, military-intelligence drones, creepy robots, etc.: this already gave a start to a futuristic nightmare, materializing invisible (digital) monsters' shadows in our real world. But aspirations to extend and accelerate transformation of our "natural world" into a scary virtual reality have now invaded our housing domain: the last refuge of individual rights and autonomous human personality. First, it was Amazon, which rating of scariness is sharing a place with Facebook, winning its housing project approval in Long Island City (New York). As the competition of dragons intensified, Google had to follow Amazon by definition. But its branch company, Sidewalk Labs, is not Google, it's much worse. It wants to control every element of urban life, installing sensors to control street crowds, cameras to spy on green zones and public spaces, automated machine processes that will track the movement of any pedestrian, car, dog, etc., and even garbage cans will "monitor" personal trash. No wonder that privacy experts resigned from the project in protest.


The data that Sidewalk Labs will steal from the occupants, it will upload into its own database called Digital Layer, and (probably, after some kind of processing) stored in a data storage called Civic Data Trust. Allegedly, the trust"s board would be judge about whom to give an access to it. Thus, an access to your personal information can be granted to your rival, to your enemy, to police and enforcement agencies, to potential (and even actual) criminals. A naive response "I have nothing to hide" is just a silly reaction to this menacing reality, because everyone can have a virtue, or a possession, or a relationship, a job, or something else that can stir jealousy, hatred, or envy among bad people, and also can bring profit to someone, simultaneously ruining your life.


In response to privacy consultant's request to clean the collected residents' data of any personal information, Sidewalk Labs responded that it would not force the third parties to de-identify it. Sidewalk Labs will even permit the third parties to develop applications, which will hunt residents' most confidential information in the digital layer. It will potentially give to strangers an access to information about occupant's intimate life, all his or her movement around, shopping list, whom the resident meet, who are the resident's visitors, and even the items in occupant's personal trash. I read somewhere in the press that the former Blackberry co-CEO Jim Balsillie called this project "city of surveillance" and "colonizing experiment in surveillance capitalism".


Google not just keeps information about your search requests; YouTube videos watched; software downloads; books read; news, and information that interests you; audio and video information from your camera and microphone, etc. - forever, but gives an access to this information for the third parties: marketers, applications' developers, and other parties. And there is a certain amount of information that apps behave according to the degree of your loyalty to corporations and faithfully. Sidewalk Labs' project for Toronto transfers this practice from the virtual (digital) realm into the natural world. It is not a game any more; it's a menacing scary reality.


Such an import of corporative surveillance from the digital reality to our real world opens an infernal door for "punitive housing" (like the punitive health care). At first, total electronic surveillance will be used for identification of the objectionable persons, and then the electronic devices will be used for their punishment (for example, the door to the dwelling will be blocked, or the owner of the dwelling will be locked in his / her own bathroom), if a resident will not be "loyal" to corporations, ideologists, financial bosses, "security" monsters, or the government.


Sidewalk Labs is planning to sell these infernal units for reduced prices, which will make them irresistible for buyers. This frightening tactics is very clear. These infernal creatures will create a precedent, and afterwards all their spying devices will be implemented in ALL housing projects by definition.


However, I am not so quick to accuse only Google, which is less unethical then Amazon, Facebook, and other most amoral monsters. Besides, Google is doing many good things, too. The problem lies in a different sphere. Common interests of corporations and secret services, which eliminated all freedoms, including the freedom of the press (media) and self-expression, and irrational, obscure ideologies have been damaged our normal life. Economic interests and profit are merely a transcription of the real trend. It is not the capitalism, which created this creepy world of total surveillance and physical and mental slavery, but the neofeudalism and new wave of the Eastern Despotism with the reincarnation of bloody cults, which transformed our normal world into a nightmarish futuristic dystopia.


....


So-called "health-care crisis" and the reduction of municipal, social, and other services go hand by hand with massive expropriation of public property. For example, the collection of garbage, which used to be 4, then 3, then 2 times per week, is now reduces to 1 time per week in most of the municipalities. While the richest possess big houses and yards, where they can keep and store their trash, the burden of 1 time per week collection is thrown on the most vulnerable and on the middle class. Besides, the antinational municipal authorities limit time for taking out the garbage from 5 to 7 (or 8) in the morning, which is disastrous for working people, and threat population by enormous fines for carrying out the garbage on prior evening.


Another irrational tendency is the corruption of the industrial products quality...


An extreme polarization of our society and the radical politicization of the medical domain are represented in such legislations as the anti-abortion law in United Stated, the violent forcible vaccination by the EXPERIMENTAL Moderna and Pfizer vaccines, and so called euthanasia (or l"aide médicale à mourir, with its hidden agenda to get rid of the expensive and hopeless patients).


Liberal's appeal for a moderate approach and reasonable politics do not reach the public not because they merely failed to gain the trust, but also because the irresponsible and reckless politicians have enticed the voters by a forbidden fruit. While the moderate Conservatives and Liberals are saying "look around: the whole world is presently in stagnation; there is an age of recession and crisis; but here, in Canada, we are still in a better situation under the Liberal rule; our economy is still doing well; the unemployment rate is down; and people on pension and on welfare are relatively secure", their opponents attract their supporters by promising to free their most dirty, most obscene desires. They do not declare it openly, but they mean it by their actions and abolition of norm and rules, and ethical practice. The most influential anti-liberals and anti-libertarians (opposed to the libertarian wing within the Conservative movement): are a product of elite schools and universities with hazing rituals.


Hazing (or дедовщина ["dedovshchina"] in Russian Soviet army, ibur in Israeli army forces, or kocenie in Poland) - is a repercussion of one of the most sadistic and wild stone-age initiation rituals, with a direct connection to savage torturing, human sacrifice, and satanic cults - is a practice that present in many places and countries, but in the Northern hemisphere most notorious for its brutal and barbaric forms in Soviet militaries, and in United States' elite universities (and, in connection with USA: in Israeli army forces).


Humiliation, servitude, torture, impossible tasks (resulting in punishment), and other forms of inhuman treatment cause numerous injuries and even deaths. However, United States universities and law enforcement agencies do very little to crack on brutal hazing. Emergency medical centers try to cover up each case of hazing, and, besides, hazing victims themselves refuse to report the true cause of their injuries (Michelle Finkel report in American Journal of Emergency Medicine).


Profane slogans and obscenities in all spheres of life, from commercials to political and cultural addresses, are used now to stigmatize and smear their opponents by all kind of influential people of all sort of ideological, political, and cultural spectrum, and this is also a product of the universities and colleges with the "hazing culture".


Now, imagine a doctor, who graduated from such a "hazing-based" university, and who participated in the sadistic hazing rituals not only on compulsory terms, but also as one of this brutal cult's priests, is seeing a patient, whom he sees as another potential object of similar (to hazing) mockeries. This situation is not a product of an individual phenomenon, but the product of a social and cultural trend, which has changed the whole landscape of the previous social consensus, turning it into something opposite. This aggressiveness and the sadistic behavior within the public and private schools, developed by those, who promoted and activated the radical shifting apart of the public and private education systems, and the vicious "normative" in the elite universities: have been reshaped all the previous compassionate norms into an inhuman and nightmarish environment, designed by the soulless moral freaks, guided not by logic and not even by the self-preservation instinct, but by their uncontrolled aggressiveness and rage.


The demolition of the accessible public health-care system is a product of such a looting, when a mob of the morally impartial freaks is destroying everything that they see in an uncontrolled rage, characterized by the words of one of them: "We cannot allow all these beggars to have the same service that is allowed to us, their masters and supporters, who, actually, fed them".


[This introduction was majorly written in 2017; this is why it sounds not up to date (if we take into consideration not the abstract postulates, but the real events). However, this even better underlines the correctness of my previsions, because, actually, since 2020, old and disables people, people with a degraded hearing and vision, and other vulnerable persons are targeted by the groups of young offenders, who push them, or beat them, or robber them in front of hundreds of the witnesses and surveillance video cameras. 15-18 years-old teenagers, in groups of 5-8 boys and girls, do such vicious acts in Montreal and Toronto Metro stations, and in the major bus stations (terminuses), under the complete inaction of the authorities. Elderly people and disabled are afraid to take a bus or to use the Metro for transportation, missing medical appointments, subjected to hunger because they afraid to go shopping.

On December, 17 (18?), 2022, eight 13-16 years-old girls brutally killed (in Toronto) - in broad daylight - an elderly homeless man, having stubbed him uncountable times, and inflicting an uncountable number of knife wounds. So they had a good time in one of the most crowded places of the city.

The law enforcement authorities and the Canadian press - controlled by the furious supporters of aggressive matriarchy - protected murderers in every possible way, distorting the main details and hiding others. Adequate comments about the contradictory testimony of an imaginary witness (who, most likely, was not there at the time of the murder); the victim's name; the exact date of the tragedy; the course of investigation; the details of the judicial proceedings - nothing was revealed. A cover-up and concealment operation started instantly after the murder. The newspapers and other media sources stopped mentioning this case on the 3-rd day, and keep silence since then (already 3 months). According to one activist's words (he is a journalist, writing for 2 small newspapers), this case was made "a state secret". The intentions of the human sacrifice rituals' lovers are very clear: by transforming this horrible murder into a kind of a classified information, they hope that people will forget about it, and the murderers will avoid any trial and punishment.

This group murder was christened as "a group incident"; the murderers were not arrested; their brutal act was qualified as a "murder of the 2-nd degree"; the newspapers insisted that the 8 murderers - are not a "gang": like, they live in different parts of Toronto; and even the fact that these girls fell already into hands of police (but left dry of water), they presented in a particular way - to shade this scandalous thing.

From my conversations with one of Maxim Bernier's advisers [Maxim Bernier is the leader of the People's Party of Canada], I knew that young girls commit today not less crimes than guys, but quite often go away unpunished. Such impunity strengthens an opinion in them that - in Canada - they can do absolutely everything; they can commit any horrific murder - and, still, will escape a punishment, because the system provides nearly complete impunity to the representatives of the "weaker sex". For this reason, according to this person, the women commit more and more fanatic crimes, which are shocking by cynicism and brutality, and the cult of cruelty, widely disseminated in Canada by the private schools with the hazing traditions, is little by little replaces the reputation of Canadian hospitality and politeness.

The obsession about the right to kill arises not from the scratch. For example, the drivers of the expensive cars quite often kill or injure pedestrians with impunity, because the human life is valued in connection with the ownership: the life of a driver is more "expensive" than the life of a cyclist, and the life of a pedestrian is not worth a penny.

In many countries, rich motorists, or, for example, the snow removing services and their employers enjoy the license to kill if occasionally hit a pedestrian: evading prosecution.]


11


The anti-democratic "revolution", triggered by the world elites, is also accompanied by the major demographic shift, employed as a sinister tool by the wealthiest and influential circles. Its goal and desire is the Demolition of the Traditional Society.


In a number of my essays and works in Polish, Russian, English, or French languages, I mentioned the most influential lobbyists (the representatives of the most powerful of all lobbies: a pseudo-ethnic doctrine-centered lobby), who advocated for huge immigration from Asia and Africa, "same-gender" "marriages", so called juvenile justice, maximally wide "euthanasia", multiculturalism, transgender mutilations, and the demolition of the traditional family. In the same time, they are in complete agreement with the gruesome Israeli practices like prohibition of marriages between Jews and non-Jews, revocation of Israeli citizenship from those converted to Christian faith, or ban to bury hairs of mixed marriages at the cemeteries in the "Jewish State". Such double standards disclose a hidden agenda to destroy traditional European societies in Europe and North America, while keeping the most retrograde traditional society in Israel and in some other countries alive.


An aspiration to wipe out the Christianity, traditional Islam, and Buddhism - gave birth to such hideous phenomenon as Bolshevism, Stalinism, and Fascism.


After the fall of Steven Harper's proto-dictatorship, naïve euphoria has spread all over the country, while young Justine Trudeau"s parliamentarian team was welcomed with ovations. Immediately, some voices, critical towards Israel, its racist apartheid system, and its oppression of Palestinian people (as well as some of the corresponding materials) have found their way to Canadian broadcasting giants. However, always suppressed during Harper's era, they quickly disappeared again.


On 22 Feb. 2016, Trudeau has approved Harper's party's pro-Israeli motion to semi-criminalize "any and all attempts" to support the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement against Israel in Canada and abroad. The motion promises punishing Canadian organizations, groups, and individuals for promoting the BDS movement. It's a hardcore irony that (immediately after replacing his conservative rival) the liberal leader voted in favor of the motion that goes against the Freedom of Speech, and offensively violates Canada's Charter of Rights and Freedoms. That's why we should not expect any changes of anti-national and anti-Christian oppressive political line in Ottawa, which doesn't take into consideration the needs and interests of Canadian people, but serves as lackeys for the interests of some foreign regimes.


However, the problem is not with Harper or Trudeau. Like Harper, Trudeau is just an accomplice for his almighty masters. In the domain of politics, politicians with even greater power than the Canadian head of State - were left no way out. We will never find out how and why his brother was killed, and what forced this young guy to end up promoting Zionist, Masonic, Globalist, chauvinistic, anti-white, and satanic agenda.


Beside the demolition of the traditional (normal) society, the forces "behind the curtain" employed another venue for breaking apart the Christian (European) civilization. They try to take away all achievements that we won in a fierce fight: like workers', consumers', and tenants' rights, accessible education, social consensus, or universal medical help.


The accessible medical help is an important part of the European civilization, and this is an additional stimulus for anti-Europeans to destroy it as a part of our cultural, societal, and identity heritage. And, thus, the Demolition of the Compassionate Medical Care is one of their main goals.


Nearly till 2010-s, Canada had one of the best medical systems in the world. It is still here, only the accent has been shifted from its humanitarian mission to a punitive, police-style function. Negligence and indifference, abuse of patients, and lawlessness on the other end dominate now the Canadian health care. There are many indications that the medical institutions are employed to suppress and destroy dissidents and activists, their life and health. Denial of antibiotic or anti-inflammatory (etc.), diagnostic procedures or physiotherapy became an everyday practice. Overcrowded emergencies, with people waiting up to 32 hours and more; inaccessible medical specialists; doctors, who must see up to 30 patients in 2 hours; or patients who have no family doctor - are signs of this dramatic degradation.


The medical care and the compassionate approach is a very important cultural heritage of the Christian civilization. However, in many countries (like United States or Russia) the medical help became reachable generally for the rich and powerful. Those less privileged are gradually deprived of having such an access. In spite of keeping its traditional universal Medicare, Canada made it working differently for the rich and for people with lower income.


Abolition or demolition of old historic hospitals and their relocation to brand new facilities is just another method to destroy the consecrated by centuries humanitarian tradition. The closure of Montreal's Royal Victoria Hospital and the perspective of an abolition of Hôtel Dieu have widened already horrible panorama of the cultural genocide in Quebec.


However, the most sinister shift awaits us down the road: for example, so called euthanasia. By legalizing and promoting so-called "death in dignity" by lethal injection, countries like USA, Holland (Netherlands), Belgium, Switzerland, or Luxemburg opened a Pandora box. (Those very states have strongest historical pro-Israel, Talmudic, and Masonic connections). Quebec not merely followed them, but became a leader in legalizing and promoting the most cannibalistic "euthanasia" "extensions", like legalizing the "medical-assisted death" for children, disables, or mentally ill, who have no terminal disease. This tendency is pushed ahead in Quebec by the same international movement, which promotes anti-Christian repressions against the church; "same-sex" "marriages"; transgender mutilations; aggressive matriarchy; "multiculturalism"; mass immigration from Asia and Africa; the demolition of the European cultural, historical, and architectural heritage; and further privatization of the public health care. Same forces advance the general post-humanism ideology, thrusting it under a shield of militaristic, "security", or "national interests" excuses. And so-called "euthanasia" is one of the corner stones of the post-humanism era.


Its questionable nature lay not in the principle itself, but in the complete unfeasibility to administrate it in real life. In no way we can find out if a daughter is advocating her mother's 'euthanasia' because of her mom's own desire, or because she can not stand mom's suffering, or just tired, or aspires a financial inheritance. When her mother insists on lethal injection, she may not be motivated by a will to end her life, but by making her daughter's life easier. Such issues are strictly personal; they cannot be "ruled", "judged", or "administrated". By materializing them in a judicial form, we're messing up a pure spiritual content with a rough normative acts.


It is frankly an anti-Christian legislation, because the condemnation of suicide has been one of very important dogmas of the Christian Church. There is an opinion that such a dogma had both theological and practical roots, because many people would willingly free themselves of duties, responsibilities, and moral burden by offering "euthanasia" to those depending on them.


In general, what does it mean "to die in dignity"?! Isn't it a supposition that just a physical state is assuring a "dignity", and human soul means nothing? Such a vulgar materialistic approach (that declines the spiritual things) will inevitably lead to a conclusion that living in horrible social conditions is equal to terminal illness, and that the poverty and homelessness can be also "treated" by the "doctor-assisted death". Instead of improving the medical care and fighting the poverty, the ruling elite will rather resort to euthanasia: an easy and non-costing solution. Further - it is more. Why to keep mentally ill people alive, if there is a convenient - problem-solving - euthanasia? Why to restrict the "doctor-assisted death" to terminal illnesses, spending a fortune on hopeless handicaps? Minors under 18 with a life-long dysfunction - who are easy targets of euthanasia promoters; also the inmates, who are kept isolated from the outside world, and can be easily killed by euthanasia against their will, without any repercussions: the expenses for their accommodation can be easily reduced by euthanasia.


Imagine a less fortunate or middle-class family in the hospital, accompanying a father with a recent stroke. In 4-5 years from now, any hospital's administration will surely invite them to an interview in the office, where an official will aggressively insist on an immediate euthanasia. "Your father can not decide for himself, because he's unconscious [or "can not speak"; or "too distressed"; or "in an obscure neurologic condition"], but would he prefer vegetation after the stroke?". Any family's objection will be met by a cold and sophisticated rhetoric about the "indications that your father prefers to die", or that his condition itself is an indication for euthanasia. If the family continues to fight, a surd translator (who allegedly decoded the lips movement), or a psychotherapist would be called in, finding a way - how to justify murdering your father. You could never hire a lawyer as good as the government"s lawyer. [This was written in 2017, when a legal aid lawyer was still an option, while now, in 2019, the legal aid was cut so that you'll never be able to have a legal aid lawyer until you'll not in a police custody. No access to legal aid lawyers opens a green light of murdering people through the medical means, including the forcible euthanasia.] In 6-7 years from now, you'll be forced also to sign a paper about donating organs of your dying father, brother, or child to a rich recipient. And, after obtaining your signature (your consent), the System will be interesting in murdering your family member rather than providing an adequate treatment, because wealthy people are waiting in line for donor organs.


The critically sick people become enormously vulnerable and convincible. After an adoption of the "right-to-die" law, your ill family member may welcome you in the hospital by words about the "doctor-assisted death", which a nurse or a social worker (or a doctor) presented as "a best solution". The sophisticated methodic of suggestion (engaged by the knowledgeable personal) will leave you no chance to dissuade your loving one. You may file a complaint, but the involved nurse or social worker (or a doctor) will deny any promotion of euthanasia, admitting only introducing it to a patient (which become fully legal after the adoption of the "euthanasia law"). The same is applicable for donor organs. "Safeguards", "controllers", "commissionaires", or an "ombudsmen" - may be corrupted; ideologically-motivated; afraid to dig in for truth; fanatically loyal to the System to such a degree that will never contest any hospital's wrongdoing; dismissed; or challenged by the government itself, or by powerful corporative or private bodies.


All above-described worries prove to be true:


"Canadians should not need to be terminally ill to access doctor-assisted dying, and those with mental illnesses or psychiatric conditions should not be excluded, a new parliamentary report says."; "The committee, made up of 16 MPs and senators, also opened the door to assisted death for youth under 18." (Laura Stone, Ottawa's "The Globe and Mail", Feb. 25, 2016). "The report (...) recommends advance consent for patients diagnosed with debilitating medical conditions such as dementia". "Four Conservative MPs on the committee released a dissenting report, saying the recommendations failed to include safeguards for young people or the mentally ill. "Unfortunately, what we have is a report that doesn't follow the evidence with the need to protect vulnerable persons," - said Conservative MP Michael Cooper, vice-chair of the committee". Conservative Senator Denise Batters (...) cautioned that psychological suffering on its own should be excluded from the criteria. "I think that provokes a very slippery slope where we could have a situation where people who have severe anxiety or depression are able to access physician-assisted suicide...". (Ibid.) Belgium, enormously influenced by medieval Flemish black magicians, astrologists and cabbalists, is already practicing euthanasia on children, mentally ill, and (according to our sources) on prisoners.


We did not even touch yet an issue of the conflict of interests and deeply unethical nature of medical doctors' involvement (and participation!) in a murder. The very thought that a doctor, who took part in such a horrible act, will "treat" you, makes us sick. It goes directly against the Hippocrates' Oath, which was already dismissed in countries like Holland, USA, or Canada. Saving just few patients from intolerable suffering, the "right-to-die" "law" promoters open a wide door for massive abuse, from amoral austerity-driven promotion of suicide among minors, depressed and non-terminally ill, to the hunt for donor organs and horrific experiments.


The neo-feudal post-humanism ideology demands the demolition of the whole previous system of values, and, first of all, the Demolition of European (Christian) [and of the Chinese civilization's] Ethics.


The deliberate corruption of the traditional European moral values is not a Canadian, but a global swing, imposed by a group of players, adversary not just to the Christian civilization as an existing phenomenon, but to all its achievements and customs. Canada is just a playground for their scary social and ideological experiments. So called "extensions" of the menacing in itself "right-to-die" law is just another manifestation of someone"s will to convert a particular humanitarian issue into its contrast. (" Le comité parlementaire chargé d'étudier la question recommande d'élargir l'accessibilité à l'aide médicale à mourir en l'ouvrant aux patients psychiatrisés et éventuellement aux mineurs ". [Raphaël Bouvier-Auclair, Radio-Canada avec La Presse Canadienne]).


A well-known technique of "absurd-theatre" (which goal is to turn every positive tendency into a nonsense) was applied by international gangsters-destroyers to the North's hemisphere civil societies. The anti-racism was "extended" up to a warm welcome for the "black" racism (which is just as bad as the "white"); the tolerance towards so-called "sexual minorities" - was "expanded" by the "same-sex couples" legally-registered "marriages" and an allowance (for them) to adopt (to mutilate) children; the amazingly positive social politics - was "expanded" by such a level of police-style repressive control that reshaped affected people's life into a prison; the campaign against the sexual exploitation of minors - was "expanded" by prison terms for innocent alleged "viewers" of "child porn", victims of provocations and tricks; the policy of the restoration of the gender equality and the dependence of women's rights - was transformed into an aggressive feminism's ideological demarche, and massive violations of men's rights, and bogus criminal verdicts in doubtful cases; and so on, and so on.


An introduction of "doctor-assisted death" is just another strip of a similar "extension"-"expansion", which true impact will turn such a wonderful fruit of our civilization as publicly-accessible full-scale serviced professional medical care into an analog of extermination (death) camps, and medical doctors - into executioners. A stigma of hangmen will stay forever, associated with all our medical practitioners, to the triumph of our enemies. And those, who are hiding in the shadow, will marginalize all conscious objectors, pushing every lucid morally medicinal professional out of her or his domain. Such a filtering will leave solely the real head cutters in the system, to serve - gradually establishing - totalitarian goals. For the present post-democratic, neo-feudal regimes not a revitalization of former concentration camps, but the hospitals, as new images of extermination sights, are the most suitable icons. And a lethal injection as a replacement of notoriously famous gas chambers is a horror of our very near future.


It is a slight possibility that the present Canadian government is introducing such an offensive pro-"extrajudicial"-state and pro-euthanasia agenda in such a hectic rash, because they hope that an earlier fulfillment of the eventual secretly given (pre-election) promises will free them from such obligations, opening a slight possibility to reverse all the imposed changes. As a former McGill "alumni", said Justine Trudeau, he's up to block any criticism of the "extrajudicial" state in McGill University campus. Why did he use the word "alumni", first of all? Isn't it because "alumni" is a part of new MUHC Glen site's name, and a referral to "Illuminati"? An additional explanation of an urgent euthanasia law is a provisioned $30-biillion deficit, adopted in a new budget plan. And every "euthanized" patient will reduce this deficit. Euthanasia law is also a kind of an initiation ceremony for entering an exclusive club of the most influential governments, which may bring a certain economic-financial relief for Canada.


It is also very sad (and wildly ridiculous) that justifying the introduction of so-called "right-to-die" law as a necessary accessory of augmenting "freedoms" and "rights", the Liberals will be obliged to vote unanimously, not individually, which is an old anti-democratic, anti-freedom totalitarian party trick.


However, all above-mentioned demolition of the former system of moral values of the era of Humanism would be impossible without the principal Demolition of Privacy.


Someone can say that countries, which adopted the euthanasia law, are the "best" and "most liberal" in the world - with the highest living standards, and that the "right-to-die" as just one of many displays of their commitment to freedoms and rights. However, I prefer the present-day Canada, not only because I am loyal to a country, where I live. I honestly think that Canada is a wonderful place with amazing people, balanced and reasonable line in her internal politics, and better social consensus. During Harper's era, the foreign political forces have tried to destroy Canadian identity, customs, and positive achievements. They made a lot of harm, but did not succeed in general. Now they will try harder. [This passage, written in 2017, is a sad reminder, how much Canada has changed to the worse since 2017; because today I would not produce such a statement. And, still, I do not see Canada among the "worse" states, as the global shift towards the anti-humanism is outstripping Canada as a jet overtakes a tortilla.]


Was it occasionally that too many (if not the most) of Russian, Romanian, German, Italian, and other revolutionary terrorists (including Lenin and Mussolini) were educated, shaped and organized in such "fortresses" of "freedoms", "liberties", and "rights" - as Belgium and Switzerland? Was it a coincident that not USA or UK, but Canada arrested a ship with an arsenal and armed terrorists led by Trotsky, but had to release them after a hail from London and Washington?


As to freedom, there is a freedom - and freedom. Who were the champions of freedoms and rights? Probably, the champions of freedoms and rights were the Bolsheviks under Lenin and Trotsky. Every one who has joint them used to receive unlimited rights to expropriate private property, to rape and murder, torture and robe. The whole rhetoric about the "doctor-assisted death" as a "freedom" and "right" is just a story for naïve and inexperienced public. This "freedom" will become (inevitably and quickly) an illicit free choice for the rich, and obligation to die for the poor. This "freedom" will open road for all kinds of abuse, exactly like the "freedoms" and "rights" given to those who has joint the Bolsheviks.


The Bolsheviks started to demolish the traditional family, promoting "free love", swindling, and homosexualism; they demolished the Christian Church, killing hundreds of thousands of clerics and other church servants, and ruining thousands and thousands of churches; they promoted the domination of women; they destroyed the main principles of privacy and human dignity, imposing the most brutal police-state regime and state terrorism in human history. Hitler, who criticized the Bolshevism, and was opposed to it in his early works and speeches, adopted a similar policy as soon as he seized the political power. He was hostile to the Church, and - if was given an additional historical time - would undertake the same repressive anti-church policy as Bolsheviks; the policy of "euthanizing" (killing) the mentally sick, the disabled, and some other categories of citizens: was adopted by Hitler's regime.


Stalin and Hitler regimes used the medical domain also for cracking on dissidents and opponents. For example, under Stalin, a party functionary was not able to take a decision about his (her) own health, but the party decided - what is "best" for its important member.


The echoes of similar policies we can witness today as well.


The mandatory vaccination by the experimental (!) vaccines; tenths of thousands deaths in the old-age-care homes only during the pandemic, and the horrific situation in the old-age nursing homes in general; the chilling widening of the "euthanasia" legislation; the savage privatization of the medical domain and the ruining of the public health care system: these are the signs of the same pandemic of the political horror. The next political "extension" of the same tendency is a very predictable nuclear war, unleashed by the same uncontrollable furious sharks.


It is logically natural for this malicious situation that patients-dissidents are sometimes asked by the accomplices of these sharks - doctors and nurses: why they did not come earlier with a problem, which began to evolve many hours (or days) ago. Such a question is usually posed in an indictment tone, which purpose is to deny medical care, as well as to justify any enormous waiting time. This sadistic system made "normal" 12-48 hours of waiting time in the Emergency Rooms not because the country is so poor and has no resources, but because the healthiest, wealthy, and rich took away these resources for themselves. Even 3-5 hours of waiting is a torture for elderly, disabled, or suffering from multiple diseases people (in addition, the seats in the most of the ER-s are the most uncomfortable, hurting and tormenting, deliberately chosen for driving the patients away), and they do everything possible to avoid the torture, coming to ER only when they found no other solution: only as the last resort. A patient is not a medical specialist, and not able to judge objectively about the gravity of own condition and its development, while trying to avoid torture in crowded, uncomfortable, and requiring up to 12-48 (and more) waiting time ER-s.


Another surrealistically barbaric modern phenomenon is a thesis that human beings are disposable, recyclable, and obsolete. Such a monstrous treatment of people arose as a product of the policy of predatory producers, who use their gangster-style methods to abolish all consumers' rights and warranties, simultaneously imposing the governmental and corporate police-state control and surveillance. Using the modern technologies and totalitarian political practices, the manufacturers started to build goods in such a way that things break down as soon as the warranty is close to an expiration date, or they make the warranties shorter and shorter, or force them to disappear at all. They are also using a principle of so-called "planned obsolescence", deliberately designing devices to make them useless even before they break down or malfunctioning, mandatory (by force) obliging customers to upgrade them. We don"t even own - any more - things that we buy; we can only rent them, as it was during the Medieval centuries, when everything was king's property, including people (his slaves). Most of the things that we buy (see so-called "limited warranty" agreement for your every purchase) are accompanied by a statement about the revocation of your customer's (buyer's) rights to own (actually) what your buy, and, instead, declaring about your duties towards the purchased things, which strip you even from your lessee's rights.


You don't own any more your cellphone, your computer applications, your car, and so on; everything belongs to the State and to Corporations; and this is a cornerstone for understanding - how and why your medical patient's rights were also subjected to revocation.


The abnormal cost of this vicious upgrading cycle, the environmental damage and the emissions from manufacturing unnecessary devices, its poisonous garbage, and its murdering labor conditions are growing, and the forcible permanent upgrade has nothing to do with real innovations or making thing better.


The same idea of the "planned obsolescence" have been "extended" to human beings in many ways, including the violently aggressive campaign for organs donation, so-called "medically-assisted death", or surgery-driven medical culture that undermines the preventive and conservative measures. Instead of investing into lab-growing human tissue and organs, or artificial transplants, they invest into the organs-donation campaign, which desecrate human uniqueness, human body, and human life, and pushes the society into an ethics-absent horror. Who deserves to survive? An older person, whose organs can be transplanted into a younger patient, or the latter; a victim of a road accident with life-threatening injuries (a potential donor), or his potential recipient; a terminally-sick patient, whose life can be just extended a little bit more by a surgery, or a healthy (in general) recipient, who "needs" just a "small" transplantation surgery? Don"t expect any ethical conduct here and don"t trust the government and the medical society. If you offered your finger to a crocodile, he will bite off your hand; if you gave away your hand, he will swallow your whole body.


The same "planned obsolescence" for humans means that they must be "obsolete" before they die by natural reasons, even before they become dysfunctional, or when they need just some small non-essential care. As soon as we become dependent from just frequent and insignificant care, they throw us into the old-age nursing homes, as if we were broken devices; and, inside these slaughterhouses, they kill us, because the most of their inhabitants die in big numbers from infections, epidemics, negligent, and lack of proper care. Another venue for the disposable "social ballast" is so-called medically-assisted death.


The whole system is presently transformed into a factory for enslaving people, taking away human rights, civil and personal freedoms, privacy, and dignity under any pretext, including a medical excuse.


However, the purest symbol of slavery and killing for profit are the private employment companies, especially when many of their owners, managers, or directors have a conflicts of interests, while working simultaneously in the human resources departments of medical institutions, firms, hotels, factories, governmental offices and bureaus, and so on.


The medical field is not exclusion. In most of the countries, medical workers can go away with any medical crime in almost 100 percent of cases, not being even questioned. They enjoy the license to kill, which means that a doctor, who once murdered a patient for a reason of criminal incompetence, negligence, greed, hatred, political or radical religious believes, or for personal motives, will continue to kill and will not be stopped. Awarding an individual, or a group, or a profession, or a class of people by a license to kill is actually taking away the right to live from an incomparably wider number of people (i.e. from the overwhelming majority of citizens).


Not just the impunity and non-accountability of medical workers is an issue, but also the fact that all reports on medics' or their employers (because, if a medical worker was forced to work more the 12 hours a shift, this person must be recognized deranged and not responsible for mistakes - the employer must be tried instead) are suppressed. Neither in so-called "free" press, nor on social networks, any materials that expose medical crimes - are not allowed.


However, in last decades, the governments (and their bosses) have gone even further.


By aggressively pushing forward the savage privatization of medical services and de facto abandoning programs of universal health care, some countries are going back in time, to the era, when only the highest estates and the most loyal to a monarch (or a feudal) suzerains were awarded by professional medical help. Indirectly, this savage privatization is an award for the lackeys by definition, because the inclusiveness and the socioeconomic success becoming impossible without some form of a loyalty to the ruling regime and its elite. It is even more important regarding the era of the modern Orwellian mass surveillance and accumulation of all personal information and data in one particular place, including personal health information and medical data.


But even such a dystopian shift has not satisfied the governments and their masters (the social and corporate-financial elite). They decided to replace (partially) such oppressive instruments as prisons and concentration camps by politicized medical institutions, criminalizing and pathologizing dissents, activists, representatives of the "social ballast" groups, and so on.


This work is a report on how the governments are punishing civilized, non-violent, and law-abiding conscious objectors through the punitive health care system (which is becoming a symbol of oppression, violence, war crimes, and discrimination).


INTRODUCTION.


There is nothing impartial, fair, or free in this world, and the health care is not an exclusion. There is always a chain of criteria: who's getting medical help, in what volume, and on which condition. Even the best medical systems (like Quebec's former universal health care) are infected by commercialization, bureaucratization, politicization, and corruption. Thought as the most human domain, the medical help system is actually a trap for patients (who are refused presently basic human rights and an adequate treatment in many ways), and for medical professionals (who are burning out at work). Many best doctors, whose professional and human qualities are priceless, are treated unfairly within the system.


However, the most shocking tendency is a transformation of medical institutions into a punitive tool, which hidden function should be not to treat, but to punish ("not to heal, but to kill").


It is not a new tendency, but, rather, a historical burden.


For example, the psychiatric institutions were used as repressive tools not exclusively in the Soviet era. In Canada and USA, mental hospitals suffocated the whistleblowers, were used for unethical researches of the mass mind control, for torturing war prisoners, for covering up political scandals, or for "neutralizing" ideological opponents / dissidents. In particular, in Canada (1920-s-1950-s), mental hospitals were huge facilities like big prisons, confining many innocent people (on request of the authorities, or their family members, or "doctors Mengele" [who needed the guinea pigs]); and quite often: on life imprisonment terms), who did not need any psychiatric treatment, and - all the more - isolation, and did not present any danger to society or to themselves. Often the patients were admitted to those mental hospitals-prisons in mass numbers, by analogy to a police raid or a political campaign; and this practice used to make these places overcrowded, with tenth or hundreds of patients on corridors, sometimes on bare floor.


Inhuman conditions, unethical methods [like beatings, electroshock, LSD (without patients' or their families' consent)], and other tortures comprised severe war crimes, which should be judged by international tribunals. Like concentration camps, such mental institutions-prisons were based on prisoners' hierarchy: the collaborators, who sometimes helped to torture or even kill other patients-prisoners, were put into the privileged positions, and, in some cases, used to become psychiatric nurses themselves. These practices took place not in the medieval epoch, but in 1950-s - 1970-s in Canada, in United States, and in other "civilized" countries.


Today, when the other extreme rules and people cannot access a permanent psychiatrist's attendance (or a temporary hospitalization), the tyranny lovers use this situation for justification of the appeals for revival of concentration camps under a sign of "Psychiatric Hospital". But, even apart of this "revival" tendency, someone is pulling the strings, in an attempt to shift repressive functions from prisons to hospitals and other medical institutions, to get rid of "non-standard thinkers", or those, who represent a social burden (unemployed, disabled, marginalized, old persons), and to suppress all objectionable personalities. As social injustice; gap between the rich and the poor; elimination of privacy and human rights' standards - are mounting, the ruling elite and human predators are looking for new effective gear against any resistance.


A highly politicized medical system, equipped by the functions of police, and serving as a replacement of political prisons and concentration camps is a new nightmare, which emerged from the sick imagination of some very powerful people.


In Canada, this international tendency is reflected on different levels, and through different levers. It already became a complementary instrument to administrative pressure, electronic surveillance-slavery-tyranny, provocations, police intimidation, socio-economic sabotage, and other oppressive gears.


Another dimension of people's mass suffering is added by the savage privatization / commercialization of medical services. The aggressive extortion of money, and shutting down an access to officially [free] available services even for acute patients: this is one of the most dramatic shifts in today's advancing of the reanimated cruelty.


The right to kill for profit with impunity is the most disgusting feature in human race. Banks, construction companies, big landlords, and other corporative vampires, which made the rental housing cost unrealistically high, produce homelessness, and (by that) they are actually killing people. They are lobbying the government to shut down the social housing projects, and are working for an increase of the cost of medical facilities' construction and renovation. With every step of the privatization / commercialization of medical services and augmentation of medications' cost - both medical care and drugs become less and less accessible for ordinary citizens. The right to kill for profit is destroying human lives and destroying Canada. Cancellation and elimination of various social and humanitarian programs multiply sick people, contributing to the virtual collapse of almost perfect Quebec's health care.


The research called "Eroding Public Medicare: Lessons and Consequences of For-Profit Health Care Across Canada. October 6, 2008" (Written by: Natalie Mehra) - is summarizing its conclusions in brief in 11 points:


1. Across Canada in total we found 42 for-profit MRI/CT clinics, 72 for-profit surgical hospitals (clinics) and 16 boutique physician clinics. The surgical clinic numbers exclude those that sell only medically unnecessary cosmetic surgery and other such procedures.


2. Among these clinics we found evidence to suspect 89 possible violations of the Canada Health Act in 5 provinces. These include clinics that appear to be selling two-tier health care and extra billing patients for medically-necessary services.


3. We found an increasingly aggressive group of private company owners who are pushing provincial governments to give them publicly-funded contracts to increase their revenues (and profits).


4. A significant number of private clinics are now openly selling two-tier health care for medically-necessary services. In addition, a notable percentage are billing the public plan and charging patients in addition, by co-mingling medically necessary and unnecessary services to sidestep the Canada Health Act.


5. The number and scope of private clinics has been growing since the deep cuts to healthcare transfers and hospitals in the mid 1990s. Their expansion has increased in the last five years.


6. This is a new phenomenon. The first for-profit MRI clinics were opened only ten years ago, and the majority have opened in the last five years. Almost all the for-profit surgical clinics and boutique physician clinics have opened in the last five years.


7. To date, every region of the country has been the target of for-profit clinics" expansion, except PEI, the Northwest Territories, Yukon and Nunavut.


8. A change in for-profit clinic ownership from small locally-owned companies to chains and U.S.-led multinationals is beginning to take place that holds grave implications. Some of the MRI/CT clinics are chains, some multinational. The first chains and U.S. multinational corporate takeovers of surgical clinics have emerged in the last five years. In the last several years also, at least one country-wide chain is emerging in boutique physician clinics.


9. We found evidence of wait times that are highest in areas with the most privatization as resources - financial and human - are taken out of the public health system.


10. We found a demonstrable reduction in capacity of public non-profit hospitals as a direct result of staff poaching by nearby private clinics. In at least two provinces, hospitals have been forced to reduce or close down public services due to shortages worsened by staff poaching from nearby for-profit clinics.


11. We found that out-of-pocket costs charged by private clinics are beyond the financial reach of most of the population in those provinces.


"The majority of for-profit clinics are maximizing their profits by charging public plans and charging patients out-of-pocket or through third-party insurance as well. The evidence shows that for-profit delivery erodes the public health system by taking financial and human resources out of the public system and by promoting two-tier health care. In many cases, the drive of clinics to maximize revenues by billing all available sources - governments, patients and third-party insurers - is jeopardizing the equality and fairness of the public system which is supposed to assure equal access to medically-necessary hospital and physician services regardless of wealth."


"There is little evidence to support the contention that for-profit ownership bears any relation to reducing wait times. In fact, in demonstrable cases, for-profit clinics have forced reductions in local public and non-profit hospitals" services by taking staff out of local hospitals, worsening shortages in the public health system."


"The more recent explosive growth has been in private hospitals - called surgical clinics - and "boutique" physician clinics selling access to MDs and health professionals for thousands of dollars per patient per year".


Many of the private hospitals are "Located exclusively in the wealthiest neighborhoods of the country"s largest urban centres, and not tracked by any provincial or territorial governments (...)".


"We found evidence of wait times that are highest in areas with the most privatization. Statistics Canada reports that Montreal is the hardest place in Canada to get a family doctor. Yet Montreal has a very high density of private "boutique" physician clinics - perhaps the most in the country - selling two-tier health care for wealthy executives and companies. These services are inaccessible for the vast majority who cannot afford the clinics" extraordinary prices".


"We found startling evidence of ophthalmologists working in public facilities are moonlighting in private clinics where they co-mingle cataract surgery with uncovered procedures in order to sell queue-jumping services for cash".


"Notably, for many provincial governments that eschew U.S.-style health care but are allowing for-profit clinics, the contention that for-profit health care delivery does not imperil the publicly funded nature of our health system is not supported by the evidence".


"It is up to the requisitioning physician" was the typical response, and several clinics told us where to find physicians who would give referrals for non-medically necessary MRIs. One clinic"s staff actually suggested to our researcher that he should get a medically unnecessary CT scan - which exposes patients to radiation at much higher levels than x-rays. Untroubled by the idea of selling potentially dangerous procedures without any clinical reason (...)"


"As our evidence shows, the context of aggressive privatization and eroding of ethical boundaries means that every province will have to set up much improved systems of registering, monitoring and enforcement".


"(...) frequent incidence of physicians practicing in both public hospitals and for-profit clinics, referring patients to their own private businesses for treatment. This raises ethical questions about self-referrals that must be addressed by provincial governments and Colleges of Physicians and Surgeons".


The research discovered dependence between the savage privatization of medical services and the longer queue within the public health system. The cataract surgery became one of the most unethical fields of private-sector manipulations.


"The practice of for-profit eye surgery raises other significant issues. There has been no investigation, that we have been able to find, of whether the wait times told to patients for receiving care in the public system are accurate. Generally, wait times vary according to need, but several clinic staff informed us of long wait times in public hospitals - encouraging our researchers to buy procedures privately - without ever having assessed their level of need. Since we found physicians practicing in both the public non-profit hospital system and in private clinics often refer patients to their own private for-profit businesses, the ethics of self-referral in this industry have come under question. Provincial governments and Colleges of Physicians and Surgeons have yet to take action to address these serious issues".


"The consequences of forgoing or delaying treatment are serious. The Canadian Medical Association Journal reported in 2007 that "Patients who waited more than six months to receive cataract surgery experienced more vision loss, a reduced quality of life and had an increased rate of falls compared with patients who had wait times of less than six weeks", and the Canadian Ophthalmological Society recommends a maximum wait of 16 weeks for cataract surgery".


While this 2008 research revealed that the cost of the cataract surgery was 1 thousands 5 hundred Canadian Dollars per eye on the average, in 2017 the same surgery costs up to 15-30 thousand CD (both eyes) for private patients! If in 2008 the cataract surgery via private clinics was not affordable for most of Canadians, in 2017 it is not affordable any more for most of middle-class Canadians as well.


This is the direct chocking result of the "Americanization" and "Israelization" of Canadian health care system.


"Only two Canadian provinces have accreditation processes that track private for-profit surgical hospitals (called clinics). In other provinces, there is no official tracking of the clinics. But the evidence shows that simple accreditation is not enough. British Columbia and Quebec have the worst record for lax enforcement of the Canada Health Act"s requirement that patients not be charged for medically-necessary services in surgical clinics".


The quoting research has revealed that even by then (in 2008) Quebec was already a champion of the privatization and commercialization of the medical services, so, no wonder that - since 1999-2003 - a catastrophic degradation of Emergency Rooms' services has happened here, which amplitude - since 2010 - became a national catastrophe. No wonder that, according to this research, back in 2008, Quebec was already a champion of the violations of Canada Health Act (89 violations in Quebec; while in neighboring Ontario: 11), and today it is suggested (judging by my own experience and by stories, which I heard about inhuman, "Auschwitz-like" conditions in Quebec's private old-age-care homes) that the violations of Canada Health Act regulations have jumped hundreds times higher here [today, in 2017].


After 2009, both Quebec and Ontario were aggressively introducing the USA-type [with the Israeli connections, especially in the ophthalmology, dental, surgical, and some other domains] for-profit health care system. Eroding Public Health, Quebec and Ontario are risking to provoke a major disaster and thousands or tenths of thousands of deaths if an epidemic or a natural disaster potential events. Copying USA-style health system, the authorities in Quebec and Ontario ignore that now, in 2017, USA public health-care is totally destroyed by savage privatization to such a degree that - in case of deep recession, natural disasters, or a serious epidemic - millions of people will die or become disabled. UK, USA, and some of Canadian provinces will pay an ultimate price for widening theirs for-profit-murder legalization, facing a huge blow to their economy, industry, political reputation, defense, and stability, and I am terrified by a possibility that, having introduced the police-state draconian changes and the elimination of freedoms, these countries will be left behind by non-democratic totalitarian states, which are more suitable for such neo-feudal reforms.


No draconian measures, no police-state model will prevent the "silence resistance" from happening (the type of resistance, which mainly toppled the former Soviet regime). Not able to suppress peoples' resistance, the ruling class will rely more and more on Artificial Intelligence, without realizing that one day their digital slaves and "associates" would be turned against them by the very logic of this development, and also because the non-democratic totalitarian regimes have better chances in this direction. The rulers of more human empires (which, by inertia, are still called "republics" or "federations") can rely only on people, whom they presently suppress; otherwise, they will face their personal demise much sooner than they can expect. Those, who see themselves invincible, unapproachable, and almighty, will meet their "final destiny". To avoid such a tragic (for all of us) scenario, they must bring back our former social consensus, and, among the most important things: an accessible universal health care.


The quoted research is highly emphasizing the "Queue-jumping and violations of the Canada Health Act", "Commercialization, selling of dangerous or unnecessary procedures", "Cream Skimming" (taking the lightest care, easiest patients, and "leaving the heavy care patients to the public system with less capacity to deal with them"), "Fraud" (in billing, etc.) ["Fraud artist Ron Koval freed after 14 months" CTV News Online, May 30, 2002.], "Secrecy and Loss of Public Accountability", "Negative Human Resources Impact on Local Hospitals", "Patient Safety and Quality Concerns", Higher Costs Under For-Profit Ownership for both patients and the government, Increasing of Wait Times, "Reducing Rural & Remote Care", "Revenue Maximization: Two-tiering, Charging Inside and Outside the Public Health System", "Boutique Physician Clinics", and so on.


Since 2008, all above-mentioned problems caused by for-profit medical clinics, old-age-care homes, labs, radiologies, medical centers, hospitals, etc., became thousands times more morbid - as the cancerous spread of the privatization / commercialization of medical services became a snow-covered mountain in 2017 - comparing to 2008 minuscule hill.


War crimes are committed within Quebec's medical system on everyday bases, not as isolated exceptional incidents.


Everyone, who wants to contest such a conclusion, ready to accuse me of exaggeration, must recall the role of Canadian medical institutions in killing of tenth of thousands of Amerindian and other (First Nations') children, forcibly taken away (by the government) from their parents and their families, and murdered in the residential schools. (The Catholic Church played not only secondary, but also a less murderous role; however, if this genocide will be ever revised, the Church will be made a scapegoat). Hundreds (or thousands) of children were taken to hospitals from the residential schools or from their families (if I am not mistaken, even in 1970-s), and died there, but these deaths and their causes were unregistered, and the children were buried in the unmarked graves. [For laundering the image of the Royal Canada (the product of the poisonous British Empire) and for driving accusations away from the state (which committed unspeakable crimes), they will invent an idea of a "collective guilt" of the white race, they will attack and destroy the Christian Church (incomparably less involved in the tragic events around so-called residential schools than the British Dominion Canada), and will advocate for the restoration of the pagan satanic cults, excusing even a sinister tradition of the bloody human sacrifice.]


In other cases, sick children of the Native Americans were admitted in the hospitals while taken there by their parents, but later were declared "dead", without any explanation or excuse, and the parents never received their children's bodies. There are rumors that these children were used for horrific experiments, or were secretly adopted by white families.


There are also more and more facts that thousands of Amerindians women were sterilized in the hospitals without their consent, and that such practices continue even today.


The medical workers (doctors, nurses: the whole staff) were collectively covering up these war crimes, and continue to do so today, which is one of the most horrific crimes in itself. Are the war criminals capable of committing the war crimes? What a naïve question!


If a considerable number of medical workers in Quebec were engaged in these horrific war crimes (and some of them continue to be a part of the cover-up till today): what moral profile of medics it is drawing in general?


I heard from some conscience doctors that some of their colleagues are angry because they must "repair" the mistakes, faults, or guilt of other people, as the health problems in many patients are products of social injustice, conjugal violence and violent crimes, homelessness or horrible housing situation, bad habits, psychological traumas, lack of education, extreme sport, toxic and (or) dangerous environment, superstitions, and other reasons. They feel like they are slaves of their position, having to clean all the dirt. The same individuals normally base their life philosophy on a supposition that the life is given only one time, so, they have to "take everything from it" (to experience just everything (extreme pleasures, adventures, wonders, etc). Such an egoistically hedonistic approach makes them indifferent towards patients' suffering and towards their own medical crimes. These are the same people, who believe that the poverty and misery is not a social disease, but the disease (genetically inherited) of the poor and marginalized, whom they want to see "eliminated". Such potential mass murderers within the medical care system are a plague, which spread wider and wider.


As more and more doctors, paramedics and nurses are coming to the medical profession not because of their altruistic urges, but because of their greed, money-hunger, and egoism, medics' reputation is corrupting more and more. It is easy to suggest that in the near future the medics will be seemed as stigmatized as executioners, police informers, or secret services' agents. However, there is still a great number of compassionate people among medics: true angels, who are working side by side with monsters, but the System is functioning not in favor of them, because it was recently reshaped or (more precisely) was made dysfunctional by the most influential aggressive, cruel, and destructive individuals, in favor of their own clones and of the very rich patients. However, they don't realize (or don't want to think about it) how many of themselves (and how many of the influential and rich people in general) are prematurely dying because of medics' mistakes, indifference, or malicious intentions. You cannot design a guillotine for the poor, marginalized, and unprivileged, and use the same guillotine to cure the rich, wealthy, and VIP. A device intended to kill will not save lives...


One of the most sinister reasons behind the actual death of Quebec's public health system and the main source of medical crimes is the Americanization of local health care. South of the border, tenth of millions of Americans have no access to health care at all (they have no medical insurance), and may die from a very mild and simple infection, appendicitis, etc. Inhuman, savage, profit-driven attitude and cruelty is a norm within such a health system's model. Doctors in United States earn incomparably bigger salaries than Quebec doctors, many of whom often deserting to US Big Backs. A young doctor in Quebec receives 20$ per patient in the public sector, and 50-190$ in the private sector, which is one of the reasons of the mass exodus of medical specialists to cruel and savage privatization drive.


Non-paid (or humiliatingly low-paid) internship on top of the soaring cost of life became a scourge, which eliminates many of young medical nurses before the end of their studies. Injustice and savage predatory policies start right away from the school, sending young doctors and nurses a wrong message and turning them away from altruism - towards egoism. It generates the shortage of medical workers, which becomes bigger and bigger as the violations of human rights and the elimination of the basic humanitarian principles spread wider and wider. Medical nurses are working in inhuman and psychologically depressing conditions, facing forcible extra hours schedule and burning out at work. Today, in 2017, they have more choices, and they are leaving their work at hospitals for easier jobs like private clinics, insurance companies and banks, pharmacies, etc. The nurses are washed out from their hospitals' jobs so quickly and in such big numbers that in 2-3 years the shortage of nurses will became a major problem.


By logic, the separatist leaders in Alberta or Quebec must be more sensitive towards the needs of their fellow citizens, but, in reality, this is much more complicated.


Some of the most influential Quebec right-wing nationalists are - actually - imposters, whose real goal is not Quebec's independence, but simply the disintegration of Canada and annexation of Quebec by United States. (Their "brothers" in Quebec's Liberal Party have same goals and aspiration). They attract and bribe the majority of ordinary Quebecers by the most odious and racist "a la Israel" apartheid laws and legislations, but - in practice - they demolish Quebec's cultural, architectural, and historical treasures; destroy the local unique French culture; support the construction mafia (which, with the participation of banks, is carrying out the cultural genocide by savage demolitions) and the sky-rocketing housing-rental prices; and systematically cut funding for Quebec's national French theatre, cinema, literature, music, and other vital for Quebec's unique culture survival spheres. So-called "language law enforcement" serve them for expanding already the most numerous in post-Soviet Era Soviet-style bureaucracy, and for blocking the access to English for everyone else who don't belong to Quebec's hereditary nobility of dynastical political, cultural, financial, and other bureaucrats. (As English is the modern language of the most important professional training and formation study books, no access to English means no good job and no professional career).


Quebec's right-wing pseudo-nationalists-renegades deployed war on Montreal, aspiring to suffocate this big city. Even without gaining the majority in the government, they already started to sabotage Montreal economy and social stability, and (together with their clones within non-separatist political parties) to destroy Montreal's unique historical-architectural treasures. Today, in 2017, it is already clear that they are planning to create a bubble of unrealistically high housing prices to drive the population out of Montreal for the cost of an unspeakable human tragedy. Their goal is to reduce Montreal's population and to inflate the population of the city of Quebec. They are planning to close Montreal yachts marinas to squeeze out rich people from Montreal, and to withdraw their money from Montreal's economy. They are planning to destroy small enterprises like stores, restaurants, bars, fitness clubs, etc. They are planning to destroy Montreal health institutions to drive people out of Montreal: to the city of Quebec.


A planned depopulation of Montreal; the war on Montreal that already started; and a planned quick increase of Quebec-City population will destroy a unique French culture and the rest of the French and English historical-architectural treasures in both cities, will provoke a huge environmental disaster, and will create a humanitarian catastrophe of the scale of a national tragedy.


Those pseudo-nationalists try to destroy the important Quebec's big companies (like Bombardier), retail networks, etc., or to sell them to Americans. They want to create an artificial social disaster, a housing crisis (with hundreds of thousands of homeless people, including whole families with children), and a dramatic health care catastrophe: just to show that it would be better to be a part of USA. Ordinary people are very vulnerable for manipulations, and they don"t understand that - as soon as Quebec becomes a part of USA, - it will be stripped of its local French culture and language, will lose any kind of autonomy, and its unique character.


The same pseudo-nationalists (and their "brothers" among federal and local politicians) in 1950-1960-s sold Quebec's amazing public transportation lines (tramways and trolleybuses) to American Companies General Motors and Ford, which, in turn, destroyed the most advanced on the American Continent Quebec's public transport for selling more of their cars. Since then, there are no tramways and trolleybuses in Quebec. In 1990-2010-s, the major role in Montreal's public transportation security and the "security" cameras network played Israeli companies.


American and Israeli companies and corporations became more and more incorporated in Quebec"s health-care system: like security, digital data, medical imagery, etc. Not only the health system, but also Quebec legal, governmental, enforcement, and security spheres, and, especially, the whole governmental digital data processing and storage, is controlled by the foreign states.


If so, any patient can be persecuted within this system by the foreign states, and the medical crimes, committed against this person, can be triggered by the foreign political elites.


Another important detail is the choice of foreign partners. Not Google or other companies, where still some of the United States patriots are working, but such really notorious "global government's" corporations like Israeli-American Facebook, or Amazon (oriented on international commercial mafia) would be soon chosen as main "partners" (in reality: masters) of the Quebec government. Not French or Quebec-French consulting companies were chosen by the Quebec bogus-nationalists, but the McKinsey & Company, a notorious agent of 3 foreign governments.


American and Israeli companies are also involved in the phenomenon, known in Israel as "kablanut": a system of slavery within the work force.


Years ago, few decent Quebecers told me that a number of Middle Eastern origins, who gushed to Canada in search for more comfortable existence - began to open here some slaveholding firms, lobbying through the all-powerful lobbying organizations new amendments to the labor code.


These or other squirts began to get jobs (for bribes) in public institutions (including hospitals) as heads of human resources departments, and, at the same time, have opened private employment agencies. This unscrupulous criminal conflict of interests not only was allowed, but - on the contrary - soon was legalized.


Even the firms that are registered on figureheads are operating freely. They cooperate with the employers, which use forbidden (noxious to health) substances; carrying out financial fraud; violate the reporting and resorted to outright scam; make all imaginable and inconceivable violations of norms of the labor law, and - still - continue to exist.


Same people told me that such employment agencies find workers through other private firms on employment, which they paid in cash.


Some social agents or their chiefs also own some of the private employment bureaus. They force people, who depend on social benefits, to work on slavish conditions for such agencies. Sometimes, to force the welfare recipients to work in their slaveholding enterprises, they illegally stop the social benefits for their victims.


(Also, the system of fraud and blackmail, the compartments of social service adopted by those social agents and managers who - contrary to criminal conflict of interest - had private employment offices was parallely involved. Within this diagram bigger predators are just "milking" the smaller).


Some system administrators; administration and security specialists in computer and Internet networks; computer and electronic technologies; security firms' employers; and other specialists, who work in a number of public institutions, private companies: participate in fraudulent actions; and, first of all, these are people from the companies, which install and exploit the surveillance systems.


A broader picture of the legalized lawlessness and protected by laws criminals is just astonishing. A practice, which, apparently, shall be recognized as a part of the criminal activities, is officially allowed: a slaveholding practice.


People, who work as loaders or cleaners in the port and in the medical institutions; at the enterprises and in shopping centers; in food and manufactured goods stores; in the markets; and in other places - formally are not employed by their direct employers. They are employed by some intermediary office that pays them the minimum wage (or even below the minimum wage) whereas taking for itself ("for services") a considerable sum of money from their direct employers.


Such a firm often register them (by means of the contract or the employment contract) as independent contractors, and, therefore, they have no right for "sick days" ("jours maladie" (the paid sick-list), neither to pension and insurance contributions, nor for unemployment (if a worker will be fired), nor for work-trauma compensation (if, in result of a work accident, an employer becomes disabled), nor for a health insurance from work, nor to a paid leave. They have no rights for anything. If they get an industrial injury - and will become temporarily handicap, or will remain lifelong disabled: no compensating, no payments, no privileges.


They are not given even the overtime bonuses; they are loaded with extra excessive work without the salary increase; they are forced to work without days off, without payable days off on weekends; they are subjected to an intentional scoffing, when they are given little work on different objects - so they have to reach from one object to another one on foot, or on public transportation, for own money.


No safety clothing is provided for them (and they are not able to buy it). They do not receive any, supposed on norms of labor safety, mittens, respirators, or boots on a thick sole (or other attributes). They are not given any instructions or clarification concerning chemicals, which are imposed to them; on the contrary, their employers hide from them what are those chemicals and what terrible harm they pose to workers' health.


Many of them are afraid to do a peep: they will be thrown out from their job at once. And many of them must feed their families; some have no Canadian citizenship or even residence permit yet, and a job loss for them is worse than death.


If the slaves try to organize a labor union: they will be immediately fired all at once, despite the fact that by some Canadian and International laws it is prohibited.


"Lawless laws" allowed the private employment offices to function without permissions (sans permis), in the course of waiting for a permit.


The demolition of the public health system and the savage privatization of the medical services are used as a pressure lever for the goal of retracting more and more slaves into the vortex of this slavery Evil. When you are exposed to the torturing suffering and can die from a simplest health issues due to the sabotage of the medical care by doctors and by the System, and your only hope to survive is to have at least some money in your pockets, you have no choice but to agree for such slavish conditions.


Many of the junior hospitals workers, caregivers in private old-age homes, even some nurses are working through the private employment agencies, not from their direct employers. Their status of slaves makes them vulnerable for any demands from the criminal minds. They (like many of the caregivers) have no appropriate experience and skills; they work part time jobs in few different places; and in many situations have no protecting equipment, no energy and will for the work with patients. They are exploited so heavily that this puts any patient in danger.


I don"t know if this is true, but I heard that even some of the doctors work through the private employment agencies, and, if so, they are slaves, too.


It is obvious that the savage privatization of the medical services is built on mass murders as on an element of the legalization of killing for profit. For example, the private old age homes' shareholders receive huge surpluses from the death rates in these institutions, because more deaths make private old age homes more profitable (lucrative; cost-effective). If your neighbor, a friend, or a relative is such a shareholder, remember that this person profit from deaths.


It looks, however, that the punitive health care was already employed on a smaller scale long before the modern (2017) round of atrocities.


I believe that in 1990-s - 2000-2007, when the majority of public was not yet facing such a nightmarish treatment in medical institutions (as in 2013-2017), I was already targeted: because in my statements for Immigration I denounced such inhuman practices in the foreign states (the sides involved in my refugee claim), and, thus, I indirectly denounced such inhuman practices, which were already aggressively pushed forward by the Canadian Federal and provincial governments.


Being a victim of the vicious and chocking refutations of antibiotics, I demanded the medical authorities to answer my request about an official or non-official policy of antibiotics restrictions, and was constantly receiving repeated denials that such a policy exists. However, it is written very clearly in the INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ETHICS TRAUMA & VICTIMOLOGY December 2015 (Some Ethical Perspectives in the Discipline of Microbiology: 5 authors, including: Rakesh Gorea, Shafqat Qamar, Gulam Mustafa Hasan):


" We are also facing the new emerging diseases as Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS), Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) or avian influenza apart from AIDS or re-emerging disease such as Ebola or Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) or drug resistant tuberculosis.

We turn our attention to questions on a social scale raised by infectious disease. Let us compares the successes and failures in combating tuberculosis, a disease that was once treatable but is now considered a re-emerging threat due to development of drug resistant strains. Two well settled examples are the reemergence of tuberculosis and sepsis due to MRSA.

The first real pride in medicine may be treating infectious disease, but antibiotics notwithstanding, neither the clinical nor the ethical challenges posed by such infections have diminished. As physicians, as a profession, and as a society the balance between

safeguarding the public and protecting the rights of the patient must constantly be evaluated. In our roles as individual patient or physician, we remain part of a global community: emerging infections challenge us to remember both.

Antibiotic constraints present difficult choices for physicians and patients. The physicians must choose between the welfare of the patient and the directive of healthcare systems for restricting antibiotics prescribing. The patient expects best care, but remains often unaware of antibiotic restriction policies and is therefore not fully informed about

treatment (16).

The physician"s dilemma is responsibility towards patient and need to preserve antibiotic for future use. So the relationship among these roles creates ethical tensions. The risks of treating or not treating the patient with antibiotics are complex. The best therapy will result in cure without a need for return visit for follow up medication.

The substandard therapy, that fails to eliminate the bacterial disease, results in a poor outcome and detrimental events and also broadens the risk of antimicrobial resistance. It is also ethically unacceptable.

It is necessary to identify those patients who need optimal antibiotic therapy to achieve the quick bacterial and clinical cure (17).

In some cases reducing antibiotic prescribing is an easy way for health care system to reduce cost rather than to improve healthcare for patient or manage resistance ".


The major Health System's trouble in Canada: it is almost complete dysfunction of the First Medical Aid. Emergency rooms are overcrowded; the waiting time (from 6 to 48 hours and more) is horrible; medical doctors are too stressed and too busy to go to the root of an illness and to prevent possible complications. Family doctors are too busy or too lazy, or bound by an obligation to save public money. Clinics are full of negligent medics, who don't want to take care of smaller health problems of their patients (or, on the opposite, are choosing to treat exclusively easier and lighter problems), and sometimes ignore very threatening symptoms. And these clinics, which have enthusiastic and compassionate medical staff, quickly become a place of pilgrimage for patients from everywhere, and, working over their capacity, close their doors in 2-3 years. Wonderful doctors, polite secretaries, and responsible nurses making them attractive for patients from all parts of Montreal; waiting time has increased up to 10-12 hours, and the clinics are forced to close their doors for walk-in patients.


There are rumors that the authorities are planning to make ALL public clinics (including community clinics and CSLS) semi-private in 3-5 years.


In the public domain, the doctors are also restricted by the choice of medications, because many of the medications are not covered by the medicare card. And the most effective for smaller problems medication are not affordable for less privileged, and even for middle class citizens. Private radiology labs sabotage non-commercial patients' objective tests reading, on own whim restricting scanning to smaller areas and downplaying (or ignoring) the pathologies.


The dysfunction of the First Medical Aid is a product of sabotage, because some important persons want to keep it this way. They expect people with complications being presented themselves to the private sector. And in the private sector, they are not interested in patient's complete recovery, because they desire to extort more money through an extended medical aid.


The sabotage of the First Medical Aid is catastrophic for Canadian social and economic life, because in the long term it going to ruin the country. As a monstrous productive line (conveyor), its multiply sick people, causing excessive demands from the social services, and provoking the opening of new old-age nursing homes. When a patient is not treated for the beginning of a relatively small health problem, or for an acute disease, a minor problem becomes a BIG problem, which demands astronomical (compared to the previous stage) finances, time, and medical care. This (and the savage privatization) is the main reason for the overcrowdings and inefficiency of today"s public health system.


THIS is the root cause of the most of my own today's health problems, and the reason of the overwhelming majority of my medical appointments.


When a patient has been denied a removal of a dangerous lesion; proper treatment of dislocation; medications to control hypertension or 1-st signs of decalcification; an access to an ophthalmologist due to elevated IOP; or antibiotics to treat UTI: this patient will become chronically ill, and will need (later) enormous sums of public money, many hours of medical workers' time, exploitation of expensive equipment, more medications, and other resources. This is what happens in Canada every day in every medical institution.


The outcome for patients and for doctors is disastrous. Doctors live not on a different planet, and the inefficiency of the First Medical Aid, when they become sick themselves, ruins their own lives, too. Due to the inefficiency of the First Medical Aid, they must work in inconvenient, unsafe, stressful, and depressing working conditions. Common (for doctors and patients) misery; a growing number of chronically ill and unable to work people; ineffective economy: all for the sake of few money-hungry sharks that enrich themselves at the expense of all other people.


The deficit of the medical response is just one of the elements of the growing lawlessness and defenselessness. A doctor, who cannot concentrate on patient's case because a mad landlord is threatening him by eviction; a young radiologist who's thoughts are far away because the racket-high rental prices forced her to move from Montreal to another city (spending now 2 hours at the driving wheel); a nurse in despair, who could not obtain a video footage after a car theft in the garage, discovering that the surveillance cameras are there to spy on condo owners, not to protect them; an anesthesiologist, nervous - because her father was mistreated at one of the long-care homes; a surgeon with trembling hands, whose son became a victim of bullying, ignored by police, teachers, and school administration; or a rheumatologist, who's struggling to survive because the bureaucrats decided to delay her child benefits for 6 months and not to admit their own mistake: these are the patterns of the (typical for today) lawlessness, non-accountability and mayhem. And if doctors' crimes will be continuously exempted from the system of justice (as many others crimes): nothing will improve in the health care system and in the drowning ship of the modern society.


However, the most sinister and horrifying tendency is a desire to use the health services as a punitive tool, to target political / ideological dissidents, and to "eliminate" so-called "social ballast": unemployed, homeless, underprivileged old-age pensioners, handicaps, mentally ill, addicts, prisoners, etc.


* * *


SABOTAGE, PROVOCATIONS, HARASSMENT, ETC.


An important addition to 2023 revised edition:


My personal case is so unique, because the methods, which they implement today, started to be employed (against me) decades earlier. I was punished for my vision of the world; my life was destroyed. All publications (or an access to readers for my works [which I published myself in a digital format]) were blocked; my job in my professional domain (which is music) was made impossible; my musical compositions were blocked from publishers, interpreters, choirs, orchestras, etc. I was ostracized, isolated, marginalized, put under police surveillance (and intimidation).


From 2006 to 2015, police stopped, intercepted, interrogated, or searched me more than 100 times.


Since 2019, I submitted few declarations to 3 police departments, demanding answers: why I was intimidated and persecuted by police in 2006-2014.


On 23 Aug. 2019, 2 police officers visited me at home; we had a conversation in French. One of the officers (M-me Hamel) has left her personal ID card. They admitted that my report about systematic persecutions by police is trustable and adequately describes the real events, but said that all traces about interceptions, stoppings, interrogations by police - and even about illegal fines! - have been erased from the police database. However, 2 police officers did not explain, why I did not receive a response in writing (as I demanded). I repeated my demand to M-me Hamel that I want to receive a letter in writing, concerning my declaration, but never got a written explanation from the police also after her visit.


Trying to find answers, I appealed for a legal aid lawyer, but legal aid was also denied to me.


I admitted (in my Declaration to police) that I did not complaint to police till 2019. However, mentioning some of the reasons, I did not mention other reasons, like the loss of trust in Canadian judicial system, which was subverted to fundamental changes (after 2001), and now is re-designed to protect exclusively the ruling elite and its lackeys; and the role of never-reclaimed fines, which confirmation I waited till 2019 (to contest them in court), but the payments have been never demanded.


This is true that I did not complain to police directly till 2019, but in 2007-2010, and later, in 2018-2020, I contacted (by phone, email, and fax) hundreds of Canadian newspapers, and other media resources, human rights organizations, but never received any reply or help.


I have a confirmation of all facts, including my appeal to police and the visit of two police officers; my appeal for aide juridique; and the submission of hundreds of my messages to Canadian newspapers.


All facts described above are undermining Canadian democracy, making it ghostly.


Here (below) are few of the selected (from hundreds of others) images, which constitute a material evidence (see below):


1. Fax to Police - Poste de quartier numéro 15 (3 images):


2. Two police officers' visit 23 Aug. 2029 concerning my complaint (1 image):


3. 1 of 4 illegal fines:


[a comment: I was not riding a bicycle on a sidewalk; instead, I was walking and pushing my bicycle beside me]


4. Some of my reports to hundreds of Canadian newspapers [I had to use non-Canadian maul server, because my Canadian emails server blocked ALL my messages to the media] (see below):


5. An access to legal aid was denied: confirmation of my communication with Maitre Edith Legault; her email address (written by herself in her legal aid office at rue de Maisonneuve (during an interview); and her email to me [Maitre Lagault tried very hard to obtain legal aid for me, but it was not approved (refused)] (see below):


Till 2016, my telephone line and Internet used to be disconnected sometimes for days or even weeks.


Depriving someone of phone / Internet / email access in our digital era is equal to a house arrest, which constitutes a very serious human rights abuse. It is causing the same isolation from the outside world. Systematic disconnections of my phone line and Internet during more than 20 years caused irreparable damage to me and my family members. Inability to contact close family members, cousins, and other relatives; difficulties for our children to study and work; unsolved heath issues (because of inability to consult the Web): are just few matters among hundreds.


My Phone and Internet used to be SYSTEMATICALLY disconnected for days or even weeks, but I NEVER received any compensation.


Together with other components of politically-motivated persecutions they destroyed my life; eliminated even a slight opportunity for normal income; made not possible my professional career; etc.


Systematic disconnections of our phone and Internet service, and the blockage of the access to our email accounts provoked a very negative impact on my daughters' studies, and made a deep traumatic effect on their psychological well-being. They left very deep traumatic scars in myself - almost like physical tortures, - and ruined my professional activity, my social life, and my contacts with other people. They also caused a considerable financial loss, but, as I already mentioned, we never received any compensation.


All above mentioned constitutes an extrajudicial punishment, practiced almost exclusively in the totalitarian countries.


A deliberate bombardment by the most vicious viruses, and disconnection of my Phone-Internet - eliminated my efforts to run my small business enterprise "Aide domicile plus", and ruined my professional career (which was very dependent from Internet).


In 1997, I received a sequence of emails (from a particular group of people), which contained provocative, menacing, and threatening messages.


Instead of supporting my demand of a criminal investigation (by the way, I also sent 3 letters to police), Colba.net provider - at first - suddenly blocked my access to my web site (a significant totalitarian beginning), then to our emails, and then disconnected the Internet permanently.


Without explaining the reason, Colba.net unilaterally cancelled our consumer agreement, terminated the service for us, and we had to switch to another IP (Total.net).


In the beginning (10 or 11 months) we had no problems with this new Internet-Email provider, which was also very significant. However, even later the situation was not comparable with the persecutions by Colba.net and Inter.net Canada.


However, our service was appropriated successively by different other companies, like Sprint Canada, Costco Primus, etc., which behaved differently concerning systematic disconnections of our Internet-Phone services. While Sprint Canada apologized for disconnections, hinting that this problem was artificially created for us on a higher level, and offered (this happened 1 only, and last time!) a very small, but compensation, Primus, Bell, and Ca-Inter-Net behaved rudely, offensively, impudently, and just mocked on us!


This email contained malicious computer viruses. The server pretended that this was not a genuine, but a fraud email; however, in contradiction to this claim, our Internet was really disconnected.


Total net and Uniserve blocked all my emails, adding a non-authorized (by the sender (by me) character to every entered (by me) email-address, but all my complaints were ignored; connection problems, which - sometimes - lasted for weeks: were also impudently ignored (see below):


However, the most vicious saboteur was Inter net Canada. For example, since the beginning of May 2012, all emails sending operation were constantly blocked:


No repeated enter of user name - password used to help.


From 2011 till 2016, Inter net Canada was usually responding by a standard form "the problem solved", without mentioning the problem and in contradiction to the fact that the problem was NOT solved. I was disconnected from Inter net Canada's online technical support; the email filters were made dysfunctional; and our Phone and Internet were completely shut down sometimes for days, sometimes for weeks.


Internet-connection problems (frequent disconnection during an Internet-session, or inability to connect at all); Internet-speed falling to "0"; phone conversations interruptions, or disconnections of the phone line; and innumerous other issues made us virtually disconnected from Internet and the conventional phone line.


In a number of cases, Bell Canada was also involved, because all "conventional" (non-cellular and not Videotrone's) material telecommunications and facilities belong to Bell. Since 2013, Inter net Canada was frequently sending Bell's technicians, but, instead of solving the problems, our telephone and Internet used to be disconnected after each visit of Bell's technician - for day or two, or, sometimes, for many days.


However, Inter net Canada, in turn, also participated in the sabotage, because the blockage of emails sending function (sometimes for weeks); disconnection of email filters; disconnection from the technical support; frequent sabotage of Polish, German, Ukrainian, and other languages' characters coding; sabotage of some emails' sending (depending of an email content (ideologically-motivated filtering); etc.: are exclusively Inter net Canada's intrigues.


In our digital era, nobody can live without information obtained through the search engines', which is essentially crucial for everyday life; for financial; administrative; customer's; social; professional; and even health issues and needs. But the principal search engines block me an access, or block information since 1998!


A complete blockage by some search engines (like Russian Yandex, or British search services), or sabotage of my search requests by other search engines (like Yahoo, Google, etc.) - aggravated the situation of a virtual house arrest. Inaccessible YouTube and Google (before we switched from Inter net Canada to another Internet - Pone Line provider); Google's "inability" to find simplest answers to elementary requests; or transformation of Polish, German, Ukrainian, Lithuanian, and other written characters into abracadabra (from time to time): these are just very few examples of hundreds (see some images below):


The picture of "medical persecutions" cannot be correctly viewed while isolated and taken out from the broader picture of totalitarian surveillance, oppression, and control, and must be seen as an integral part of the complex of repressive practices, which include police intimidation; administrative pressure; various provocations and attacks; digital terror; and other terror methods.


No one is attacked by so many computer viruses and so many times. Literary thousands of viruses have been sent to my computers since 1995, including such as rootworms, which are used by militaries or by the secret services, not by ordinary hooligans or hackers. I was attacked by computer viruses through emails, web pages, or while downloading things. Computer viruses were sent by my Internet-providers, by well-known web sites (including governments' portals), by anti-virus software producers, or by other software hosts, by search engines, or by online vendors; and so on. The structures, which claim that they fight "Internet-terrorism", are terrorists themselves, who use the terrorist methods to "neutralize" dissents.


Their special "military" computer viruses destroyed several of my computers; my personal databases (personal photos; music; my literary works; correspondence; home videos; etc.); 2 or 3 monitors, and other devices; etc.


When - after a next vicious computer viruses' attack - I used to look for inexpensive computer parts, or peripheral devices, - I was surveilled and prevented from buying what I needed the most.


For example, when - in the beginning of 2000-s - the video-card of the motherboard has burned due to a virus attack, I decided to buy a video card for a free slot: to have an alternative monitor connection.


I received information (from one of my friends, who was buying computer pieces for his business) about inexpensive video cards in one of the computer stores.


However, when I came into this store, I saw a worker, who was removing this exact type of video cards from the glass shelves. I asked him - what he is doing, and he responded that he is removing some "non-condition" video cards to a storage. When I told him that I would buy such an allegedly "defective" video card, he said that the card is "not for sale".


When I needed memory chips, and went to a computer store, I met an acquaintance, who told me that bought the same memory (which I needed), and told that "they have a lot of them". However, when I asked about this memory card, I was told that they don't have them.


Once, when I was buying an inexpensive internal burner near St.-Catherine - Aylmer, and payed by 20 can. dollars bill, I received a change as if I paid by 10 dollars. I was absolutely sure that I gave 20 dollars (I looked carefully), and called the police. Two police officers came (two policewomen), who looked into the video recording, and told that it is not clear, by what bill I was paying. Something fishy was in their conclusion, which doesn't mean automatically that the police officers were not telling the truth. It is possible that the store used some trick, but, unfortunately, the further investigation was not in the police's competence.


In January - February 2023, I drastically needed an external hard drive around 1 terabyte, to put an additional operation system into this disk, but our financial resources are so restricted that even such a purchase is too expensive for us. Fortunately, I received an information from one of my friends, who told me that he saw such hard drives for 60 - 70 dollars at the computer store in downtown (488 St.-Catherine West). On my way to that store, I was watched by 2 man and by 2 police cars, and, when I came, the "doorman" clerk told something privately to a vendor, who removed several less expensive external hard drives from one of the shelves. When I approached, asking for an external hard drive, this young man openly mocked at me. It is not excluded that it is the same store (which stays open at least 20 years), in which I was robbed by a vendor, when handed over a 20-dollars-bill, and received the change as I paid by 10 dollars.


In the end of 2022, I bought a number of computer and audio appliances in an electronic store near Wellington and Lassalle (spending around 25 dollars), which I desperately needed, but otherwise could not buy, because - in the specialized stores - they cost a fortune (regarding our socio-economic situation). The vendor (and, as it seems: the owner of the store) was an Indian, an origin of India. ALL of the appliances were defective, and one of them has seriously damaged one of my computers. I was lucky to have computer accessories for replacement.


For many years, something is destroying my musical files, ruining my musical compositions, which I compose using my computers for recording and reshaping my music.


This serious problem with the audio-files: it is - possibly - some kind of sabotage, as something is destroying my music files. There are - whether intentionally "injected" into my computers [EXCLUSIVELY RARE] computer viruses, or some damage of the audio-codecs.


For many years, I am trying (in every possible way) to go to the roots of that problem, and to understand - what is going on. I involved a whole team of my acquaintances - serious experts - into the solution of this "mystery"; I filtered a whole "sea" of Internet forums and chats, known for discussions of sound engineers and musicians (who process music on computer), but so far could find out nothing. And it means that some very serious forces stand behind this sabotage.


For example, I record my voice (vocal) in a musical application. The voice sounds clearly, adequately, in the compliance with the standards. And here, after the completion of tracks' mix in the same, or in some other application (where also all instruments' parts sound clearly, adequately, without hissing, cracking, or crackling), the final file turns out to be a garbage - with distorted frequencies, timbres, with crashing and thorn, and the voice is especially distorted, with comical hissing (as though there is a speech defect), with a distorted "r", etc.


When the voice enters, the general sounding level sharply falls down (or voice's loudness sharply drops, or the instrumental (the "backing tracks") disproportionally "disappear" (in comparison to the voice), or altogether). At the same time, the loudness of the instrumental sections sharply changes in the instant of a new instrument enter. "Non-authorized" fade ins and fade outs also appear in every final version: at the beginning (of any composition), the music sounds very quietly, and then gradually amplify, nearly to the middle of a song, and fades out slowly after this highest point: which is contrary to author's intention and to the actual music sound in a musical application.


I spent enormous efforts and time; I stuck together eyes to deal with it; but neither I, nor my consultants and assistants did not understand anything. And - the saddest fact - it all occurs with all mine computers, though there are DIFFERENT systems (from Linux and 7 Windows' generations, to Mac), different audio-codecs, different programs, not connected with each other.


I even reinstalled the systems and put all new software in 2 of my computers, and - in the beginning - everything worked normally; however, PRECISELY in 2 hours, the same defects and abnormalities appeared again, coming back.


In end of 2021, 3 music publishers have expressed a desire to publish 5 of my piano circles: 22 Preludes for Piano, The Lyrical Pieces, etc. However, each of them demanded a new version of the piano scores, because, printed 25 years ago in the old Finale and Sibelius applications, my layout did not correspond to the modern demands of the print out imposition.


I borrowed a laptop with a retail Finale 2012 from one of my friends, and - during 4 months - was intensively working on the layout's modernization. It was not very good for my eyes, already destroyed by an intentional harm (read my medical chronicle; the part entitled Who Destroyed my Vision and Hearing), and by medical mistakes and intentional harm, inflicted by ophthalmologists. The combination of open and close angles glaucoma, and other multiple problems - are making my intensive work on the computer very dangerous for my vision.


However, all my efforts appeared to be futile, because the publishers found a small number of mistakes in every next new version, while these mistakes were looking like a mystery for me. I suspected a bug in the software, but no bug could cause such failures.


I worked very hard till the beginning of March 2023 (almost one and a half years!), and, finally, all 3 publishers were satisfied by the fair version. But soon, each of them found some new small typos in the final piano scores. 2 of them also asked me - why I changed the music: it appeared different from my original versions. I was perplexed, because could not find anything similar in my own *.mus, *.musx, or *.pdf files.


Then I asked them to send back (to me) files, which I submitted to them.


When I received the demanded files, I was shocked: instead of my original music, I saw a primitive caricature, not my piano compositions.


Here - below - is displayed the astonishing difference (the comparison between the "imposter" file - and my original composition [the destroyed piano score is on the left, and the original is on the right]:


No software bug could destroy the notation text in such a way, no computer virus.


Piano braces and brackets: gone; the right-hand party: gone (both lines display a unison); tempo's precise indication: gone. The 8 down symbol appeared not down the system, but between the lines of the r. and l. hands' party's, and, besides, replaced by "15" (2 octaves); "va" replaced by "mb". My consultants claim that the original text was "mutilated" by the Artificial Intelligent.


Having opened same pdf files in my Internet-computer, I discovered that they are identical to the "broken" pdf files, which my correspondents (music publishers) received.


However, when I studied files with the same names and requisites in my main computer, which never goes online, I found with a sigh of relief that these files were untouched, and maintain their original content. I was lucky that the fruits of my efforts have survived in my main computer.


It means that my Internet-computer was hacked, and someone deliberately destroyed my music in the pdf files, by changing the normal music notation text to a junk.


Naturally, I had no need in verifying each of the pieces again, as, since I copied 5 Books of my piano music into the Internet-computer, they should be identical to the versions in the main computer.


So, now I decided to bring the electronic versions of my piano music to my friends, and to resend them from their homes.


However, 2 days later, when I returned to Montreal, and was ready to resubmit the right version of the Preludes, I learned in disbelieve and in despair that the fair version of my Preludes disappeared, and does not exists on the hard drive anymore! Fortunately, I had a copy of the original on one of DVD's, but it was a version before 2021 (see above), which means that my whole hard work during more than 1 year was null! The editors demanded an equal length of all lines (systems); A4 pages' format; a better quality of the musical staff; and so on. While the Prelude number 8 (see above) is relatively easy to "repair", other preludes demand weeks or months of work.


But even a bigger embarrassment and damage occurred for an additional reason: I submitted these and other piano circles, my piano sonatas, and other compositions to 17 other music publishers; to dozens of professional musicians; to libraries; and to music websites, and (as I could learn 2 days ago) all of my music anthologies have been turned into garbage at the moment of their arrival to their destination.


The corruption of my audio-files and the damage of the notation text of my music books can not be explained in any way, rather than by sabotage.


While, in the normal circumstances, I am able to control my activities, varying 5 min. of work with 7 min. of rest, the malfunctioning of the audio and notation tools made me hectic and impatient, and I was staring at the monitor for 3-4 hours in a row, forgetting about breaks. Thus, the saboteurs not just damaged my creative works, my creative plans, and my professional success, but inflicted a real damage to myself.


In the end of 2005, I was approached by a world-famous journalist and human rights activist, I. Schamir (his real name is I. Schmerler), who asked me to translate his key book from English into Russian. During my work on this translation, I was confronted by some challenging difficulties, when 5, 6, 10 (or, sometimes, all 15) pages of my translation used to be corrupt in such a way that turned them into garbage. I invited 2 specialists on computer viruses, but they were unable to crack this mystery. From the beginning of my work for I. Schamir, I was attacked by dozens of computer viruses, spyware, and by hacking attempts. With extreme difficulties, but, finally, I found a way to neutralize the files' corruption [of my translations' text], and started to send first chapters to the author. However, I understood from his response that something bizarre is going on, and, in the process of investigation, learned that my translation was altered and destroyed new AFTER my submission by emails. Unfortunately, Schamir did not believe in my claim that my files were destroyed on the way to him, and treated me (after that casus) differently. He sent me back some files that he received, with his remarks about my "bad knowledge of English and facts".


I don't pretend that my written English is faultless, but my general knowledge of English is almost adequate, and everyone, who reads this work admitting some discrepancies, will confirm, in the same time, that I know the language well enough. My knowledge of English and my intellectual erudition is sufficient for translating such essays of Schamir as, for example, "The Sword of Saint Mikhail".


There were some objective mistakes indeed, because of 1) the difference of the spheres of interests; 2) my isolation from the sources of knowledge and information (like online encyclopedias and dictionaries, and search engines, which block my access); 3) provocations in academic and public libraries in Montreal, which literary expelled me from their visitors and users.


However, Schamir's criticism and the copies (of the files) that he sent me back (allegedly, my original translations, but, in reality, they were altered and cowardly changed by someone or something) have shown a deliberate sabotage. The text was corrupted in such a way that demonstrated someone's desire to present me as an intellectual moron, while, simultaneously, preserving my individual style. Today, I have no doubts that this dirty job was done (already by then!) by the AI. That's why I believe that the achievements of the 2020-s AI technologies existed already in 1990-s, they were just hidden under the table.


When a famous cultural figure, Ilia Kormiltsev, expressed a desire to publish a selected collection of my verses from the 6-th volume of my pre-emigration poetry, this volume disappeared from my home without the traces. After some time, the 6-th volume reappeared in our apartment, but, when I already started to scan it and convert it to the digital text, it disappeared again: this time without traces. More likely, it happened after Ilia Kormiltsev's death. A second copy of all 6 volumes was kept by my mother, in her apartment, but the 6-th volume vanished from there as well. And the 3-rd copy was given (for preservation) to one of my friends. However, in his home, as well, all other 5 volumes were safe and fine, but the 6-th volume was also missing.


Interestingly, prior to this disappearance, I discussed my verses (and read them) on the phone with my friend, Yuri Belansky, a cult figure, a famous film director. I presented the verses from the 6-th volume at the end of our conversation...


..........


The whole gamma of provocations, administrative pressure was used against me by several governmental agencies (like an incorrect tax report proceeding; stoppings of payments; refusals of allocation; etc.), by BELL communication company, and so on.


The intensification of oppression since November 2022 was, probably, caused by the growing intolerance towards the conscious objectors. When violence, aggression, domination, slavery, and rage become the deities of the modern rulers on the global scale, people like me, whose philosophy and ideology are based on peace, non-violence, and truth-search, become targets of the monsters.


Since my birthday (3 Nov.), provocations, police surveillance, sabotage, and other intimidating actions against me have intensified to the scale of 2013-2014.


My official (payable!) email service [ca-inter-net] began again to sabotage all non-English characters in my email postbox. All Polish, Ukrainian, Belorussian, Russian, German, French letters become ??? signs on the list of incoming emails, inside the text of the incoming emails, and within my emails sent to my correspondents. All my email messages become abracadabra. In the same time, I am cut off the technical support (ca-inter-net sabotage my complaints and the access to technical support). I switched to another company years ago, but I have no choice but to keep my official email box at ca-inter-net.


Since abandoning ca-inter-net, and switching to another Telephone-Internet provider, I did not have any problems during 7 years (like systematic disconnections of my phone line and Internet (sometimes for weeks!); intolerantly slow Internet speed; vicious computer viruses' attacks directed from ca-inter-net server; sabotage of my emails; etc.), but - since the day of my birthday - some problems have started to accumulate again. In last 5 months, Telephone-Internet was down 3 times for 5-6 hours. The ID-caller stopped working. I am cut off the International lines, and not able to call my relatives in Germany and Poland. However, the isolation from the distant calls' network could happen on a higher level than our Telephone-Internet provider.


The last is confirmed by the fact that the ominous company Rogers (not less ominous than Bell), which becomes in Canada the same monopolist as Bell, is going to buy the local Quebec company Videotrone, which services we use. The problems with our Internet and phone began then when the first messages about Rogers' intention began to surface. Problems started also with other services, which also foreign firms intend to buy. It means that - while we used the services of the local Quebec companies - everything was as it should be, and - for 7 years - we were freed from the spiteful mockery, but - as soon as we got into hands of foreign firms (or non-Quebec Canadian companies), the former politically motivated prosecutions at once restarted.


This fact, in turn, confirms all my former guesses (about the one, whom exactly I have to "thank" for the fact that my life was broken and that I am exposed to the ceaseless abuse and scoff), which I hinted in this extensive chronicle.


It is not a coincidence that - simultaneously with the disconnection of the display ID-caller function - a malicious campaign of systematic anonymous calls has restarted after 5-6 years of calm. Since November 3, 2022 (my birthday!), I receive 3-4 or 5-6 anonymous calls per day, not being able to see the phone number of the caller. Obviously, one of the most probable goals of the callers is to knock me out of balance (to play on my nerves), but these systematic anonymous calls can also serve a purpose of verification if I am at home; of an analysis of my mood, physical and psychological condition; etc. (?). They can simply check my hearing and reacting capabilities for possible future provocations; or collect samples of my - allegedly - "inadequate" responses or reactions (skillfully setting up special particular situations for staged replies): for a future smear campaign. For example, 13 Apr. 2023, a young Brute has played a role of a vendor - who is calling about a delivery of some mattresses, while distorting his voice by noises, signals, and music: clearly mocking at me and hiding his scoffing sneer. A functional ID-caller would give some general ideas about this months-long provocation, but it was shut down by the Internet-Telephone provider. I called few times; my daughter called them; they promised to call back - and NEVER called back.


After 3 years of calm (when home intrusions used to happen very rarely [I mean illegal searched in our absence at home]), unlawful possible intrusions into my apartment have also intensified, sending scary and intimidating signals.


The entire series of provocations and intimidations (like attempts (or their imitation) to hit me by cars, or by other transport vehicles) restarted - first time since 2015.


Here is one of the most typical examples of oppression and intimidation since Nov. 2023.


One of the areas of my activism is the defense of European historical, cultural, and architectural heritage, and - in my musical videos, in my essays and analyses - I often raised the questions about what I am calling a cultural genocide in Quebec: the mass demolition of the most beautiful Christian churches, architectural treasures, historical buildings, and cultural sites. I am also "protocoling" demolitions (ideologically or profit-driven motivated) of the most valuable heritage sites, photographing innumerous objects in Montreal.


Naturally, the construction mafia and the corrupted officials have noted my activity long ago.


I am also advocating for the rights of homeless people, denouncing artificially inflated housing prices; construction mafia's role in this national shame (homelessness); the bubble of the vicious real estate speculations; and the sinister banks' operations behind the demolition of our cultural-historical heritage, and behind the catastrophe of the unprecedented rise of homelessness.


The recent tragedy in Old Montreal (16 Mar. 2023), where (most likely) a criminal arson have destroyed a heritage building, and took lives of 8 or 9 people, injuring others (some of them will be left with lifetime permanent traumas) - is where 2 ravaging tendencies meet: 1) the barbaric destruction of the historical heritage, and 2) the artificial housing prices' inflation bubble, which left hundreds of thousands people homeless or virtually homeless, and provoked hunger. This most depressing tragic event (in Old Montreal) shows that the both disasters are fueling by the same group of human predators, who don't respect human soul as they don't respect the value of human life.


Unfortunately, one of the most gruesome activity of the demolitionists is the slow and "concealed" demolition of the Old City of Montreal.


Formally, the Old City of Montreal is protected by Quebec, Canadian, and International Laws as a recognized cultural-historical treasure, but - informally (and encouraged by corrupted officials) - the construction, corporative, and bank mafia is "quietly" demolishing it for years, grading-leveling the architectural details; "adding" new upper floors on the top of the old historical houses; building new residential units inside the Old City; or "silently" demolishing some heritage buildings for erecting new "ultra-modern" commercial sites on top of the ruined edifices.


Some of the heritage buildings are deliberately left without restorations or repairs for years: to create a pretext for destroyers. Some of them are left in the ruining condition for many years.


Even in 1990-s, when we came to Montreal, the Old City was still "connected" by some sectors-strips zones (of old industrial and residential buildings) with Pointe-St.-Charles, St.-Henry, Griffintown, and Verdun areas, but the authorities allowed the demolition sharks to ruin from 5 to 11 km of the historic areas around the Old City, destroying one the most beautiful and distinctively original city in the world.


The construction mafia have ruined the innumerous number of the most beautiful and culturally-historically valuable buildings in Montreal. If a historical architectural treasure is protected by a heritage act - they set up an explosion or a criminal arson, and then demolish it anyways.


From 2002 to 2014, I collected all kind of materials about criminal arsons, and came to a conclusion that Montreal can lay a claim to priority for the title of one of the world's champions on criminal arsons. But I never heard that someone was charged and convicted, which inevitably means that the criminal arsonists have a protecting hand in the City Hall, in the municipality, in the City Council, and in the Police department.


If a civil engineering firm submits a request for demolition (planning to erect a bank, a business center, or a residential skyscraper), but this request is refused, and for the next day or in several days a criminal arson destroys that particular historical building (upon which the builders attempted): the offenders disclosed themselves, right? But there are ever neither charges, nor arrests, nor processes. What can draw from this a conclusion?


When the savage demolition of the surrounding areas was approaching to the point of a total annihilation of the past, the demolition vampires started to cut off pieces of the Old Montreal itself, demolishing some buildings of the Old City on its outskirts, or inside some of the Old City's particular zones.


One of the modernity intrusions in the historic Old City is represented by the edifice of the Museum of Archeology and History - Pointe-à-Calière (350 Place Royale): a new building in a "modern" style. It is cynical and irrational that the museum of history is located in a monument of history's demolition.


The Pointe-à-Calière museum is situated on the verge of the most structurally important point of the Old City: Place Royal, De la Commune - d'Youville streets. The demolitionists have started to develop their appetites for ruining rue d'Youville or its parts long ago. They demolished the segment of this street after McGill, till University street.


In 2007-2009, the menace has threatened the part of d'Youville around Pointe-à-Calière, including the edifice on the opposite side of the street, and the heritage building behind Pointe-à-Calière (second after the museum), situated on the corner of d'Youville and a miniscule street du Port St. I heard rumors that there are plans to demolish both buildings.


So, I started to photograph this part of d'Youville, to preserve its look in 2008-2009 at least in photos. One of the reasons behind my urgent photo-session was information that the heritage building du Port - d'Youville was put on sale, and that some criminal groups were behind the instigation of this sale (through a series of criminal operations). Some of the details have surfaced a bit later in Journal de Montreal, and in 3 other newspapers, but today it is almost impossible to find their originals, and the digital archives are subjected to censorship and falsifications.


When, in September 2009, I came to du Port and d'Youville, I saw a sale placard indeed.


So, my worries that this "bâtisse" will be demolish or destroyed by renovations, were not ungrounded. Historical photos (1910-s - 1920-s) show that it was already graded, and looked a bit differently in the past.


The building Place Royale - d'Youville was demolished indeed (I think, in 2012-2013: partially demolished, partially reshaped). It was not a heritage site, but, still, the new structure looks even more like a foreign body in this part of the Old Montreal. Instead of rebuilding 2 replica houses (copies of the old epoch), they were driven by the instant profit greed. This alien for the Old City element is the Botique du Musee (!).


Concerning the second potential victim, the heritage building du Port - d'Youville, this building was subjected to abuse and mismanage right after its sale in 2009; its indoor architectural design was destroyed; and the whole logic of manipulations around this heritage site was crying that someone is preparing it for demolition in 10-15 years. This time was needed to bring it to an "accident condition", turning it into a dangerous structure despite 2 cosmetic "renovations" since 2009. It was only lacking a criminal arson or an explosion - to erase all traces of criminal manipulations.


In April 2023, I went towards Old Montreal few times, but was met (on my way) by such a manifestation of police intimidation that decided better to turn back home. It was clear that someone does not want me to see something in Old Montreal; otherwise the police demonstrative presence would not intensify when I approached closer to the Old City.


However, once I marched till Place Royale, then around Pointe-à-Calière, exiting to de la Commune via du Port, and was very depressed by something that I saw there. Maybe, it was a pickup car, which was circling there, maybe some suspicious persons, but something definitely entered into my sub-consciousness: a feeling that something is not OK around this corner, that something terrible is going to occur there very soon. I know that a personal impression and personal feeling is not a legal proof, but, still, it is an indication of somewhat disturbing prior to the criminal blast on 16 Mar. 2023.


I heard about the unspeakable tragedy on radio, on March, 16, 2023, and watched a reportage on air (antenna) TV the same day.


By an unconfirmed information, there were 22 people inside the affected building at the time of explosion and fire; 7 of them were declared "missing"; 1 or 3 people were proclaimed dead at the scene or in the hospital (this information was later contested); 9 people were taken to a hospital in a serious condition. Others escaped without serious injuries.


On March, 19, 2023, I came to Old Montreal just occasionally, on one of my routine walks from home, around the surrounding areas, without taking my best photo-camera with an optical lens. However, watching some strange police', ancillary activity workers', and firefighters' activity around Pointe-à-Calière and the burned building, I felt an emotional shock, and made a series of photos with my small camera. Police did not confront me, but demonstratively marked a "red line" for me, pointing to places, where I am not allowed to go.


I am omitting my description of the events on 19 Mar. 2023, and the profound analysis of my photos and of other images of the arson, and concentrate exclusively on the conclusions:


1. Experts (to whom I presented my photos (and some other images) had no doubt that the arson was caused by an explosion (like a blast of several gas-cylinders; however, to my knowledge, the building had no gas-based devises (it had electrical heating, and so on), so, the presence of gas-cylinders is a criminal act in itself).

The version of an explosion is confirmed by the witnesses ("Alina Kuzmina and her spouse were sleeping in one of the Airbnb rental units inside the building when they were awoken around 5:30 a.m. by what she describes as the sound of an explosion". "We started seeing the orange flames and the orange light from underneath the door and the sound of crackling fire, so it was pretty clear that there was a fire right outside the door," she said" [CBC]); by some media photos and by my own photos (judging by the character of the damages, and by the debris on the ground); etc.

All media photos show the firefighters standing too far from the building during the rage of the fire: much further than it was required to avoid the falling debris. Experts say that the firefighters were positioned according to the classical explosion-alert tactics. Everyone, who looks at these photos, will agree that they are standing suspiciously too far away, waiting for a possible second blast.

When I walked around groups of local residents, they were saying that heard the explosion. It is very clearly could be seen on my own photos (19 Mar. 2023) that some of the metallic grilles were certainly smashed by a blast.

One of my photos from 19 Mar. 2023 shows that the burned building is the only one (and the last one) that somehow miraculously avoided an architectural obliteration (in this sector). All other houses at du Port have lost their ancient look. Secondly, a view from this side convinces even more that there was an explosion close to the roof, which scattered the whole roof and the upper part of the last (3-rd) floor. There are clear signs of a blast and of a blast wave.

Comparing my own photos of the same edifice (burned on 16 Mar. 2023, on the corner of du Port and d'Youville) from 2009 and 2013 - to my photos taken on 19 Mar. 2023, no one will doubt that such a very particular damage to this kind of roof could be inflicted ONLY by a blast, or by some super-flammable substances.

2. The explosion fact is so obvious that the authorities could announce it right away, and their silence (running forward: already in April 2023) is signifying that they have what to hide.

3. Media photos, and my photos show that all backdoors, and all windows not only locked, but also covered by the metallic grille. Why the firefighters did no attempts to unlock the building, taking out the metallic grilles, and unlocking doors and windows? This could be done not only by using some sort of machinery, but by very simple "hand-made" devices and very simple methods, without putting firefighter's lives at risk. Trapped inside, people were doomed to a ghastly death. Many of the basement floor's windows were still hammered in hermetically even on 19 Mar. 2023; the back doors were locked not only by the locks, but also by metallic door grilles. Why the firefighters were using just water-cannons, instead of special means to calm down the highly flammable substances. It was clear from the 1-st minute that water is not going to work well.

4. The building owners, managers, and Airbnb - they consciously left half of the tenants (or most of them) without an access to fire escapes. Some (or most) of the victims were placed in the miniscule (toilet-size) rental units without windows and without any fire exit. From an interview on French CBC radio, we know that ONLY SOME of the privileged tenants had an access to a fire exit. One of my correspondents assumed that someone made calculations on the fact that several fatal cases (caused by an arson), most likely, will lead to demolition of the building, and it could be one of the motives behind the actions of criminals, who obviously blocked almost all fire escapes. How wild sounded such an assumption - it is as though finds a confirmation in the words of one of police chiefs, who said on radio literally the following: "We will sort all building on a brick, but we will find bodies of the dead".

A witness, who described his bewilderment on an Internet-forum, claimed that heavy garbage cans (buckets) were placed outside the backdoors between the lattice and the door AFTER the fire broke down. It is possible that we see it on one of the photos, submitted to me by friends: with firefighters standing in front of a locked door with a metallic grille, and a huge garbage can is placed behind the grille and before the door.

In the daily morning radiobroadcast on CBC's French channel (from 7.00 to 9.00), the radio host interviewed one of the victims, who lived in this building on the corner of d'Youville and du Port. This man was seriously injured, having eyes-burns, his respiratory ways injured, etc. He told that submitted his demands to investigate the fire-dangerous situation (in this building) several times, but the fire department just ignored his complaints. He also told that he had his personal (separate) fire-escape exit (because lived under different conditions than the Airbnb tenants), but there was no fire escape for other tenants, who would obviously perish in case of an accident. This man also said that the building was in an emergency condition. He accused someone from the top bureaucrats personally in this tragedy, but I could catch the name. The reaction of the radio host was confusion and shock; he was embarrassed that allowed such a statement in the live conversation, and tried to "erase" this statement by his comment - that, allegedly, his interviewee is just too outraged and victimized right now, and later he will, supposedly, "re-evaluate" his judgement. I am not sure about this man's next statement (because my attention (and hearing) was distracted by a noise from a neighboring construction site), but, I think, this man also said that he was threatened and pressured by people, who wanted to turn his apartment as well into the Airbnb rental unit.

All above mentioned facts and observations are so sinister, worrisome, and frightening, that forcing to doubt if we will ever know what caused the fire; how and where exactly the victims died, and from what cause; if some of them were murdered BEFORE the fire; who is responsible for the tragedy; who coved up a fire-hazardous condition inside this building for years, and who covered up the illegal Airbnb here. Will someone investigate - who and why eliminated all fire escapes for a number of rental units; why all fire alarms in the 15-units building were dysfunctional, and "neither of (...) fire alarms (...) went off, forcing" people "to wake up to the flames" (Sabrina Jonas, CBC News, Mar 18, 2023)?

5. The secrecy around this tragic event is an evidence in itself. Excusing the ban on all victims' names, a police official said on the radio that this is just a confidentiality issue, but everyone knows - how the authorities are "worried" about "privacy" and how they respect it. On the opposite, victims' names should be remembered, and a monument in memory of them should be erected, with all their names carved on a stone.

The incredible secrecy around this tragedy is clearly signaling that the authorities have what to hide. They keep silence about the poor condition of the building prior to the fire, concealing the fact that the entire indoor structure has collapsed due to the neglected maintenance; they keep silence about the cause of the fire, despite the evidence that it was an explosion with a super-flammable filling; they keep silence about the non-fire-rated condition inside the building; they conceal the whistleblowers' report to the fire-prevention department, and to other municipal bodies about the inadmissible and intolerable violation of the fire-prevention security in this building; and they conceal dozens of other important facts and discoveries. I heard about the inadmissible condition in this building from people in Old Montreal in 2013 and in 2015, and learned about the same online in 2019.

An only fact that the authorities admitted is that the Airbnb was running this busyness illegally, because this sort of housing rental units are not allowed in the Ville-Marie borough. However, the Ville-Marie borough is the "personal" "patrimonial estate" of the mayor of Montreal, who is the mayor of this borough simultaneously. The illegal rental estate operations under Valerie Plant's very nose are telling about her outraged incompetence, and about someone in her command, who cover up all dirty operations of the sharks like Airbnb (see also: Old Montreal fire: Traveller urged Airbnb to investigate a year ago, The Gazette, Montreal).

The covering up secrecy around this tragedy is confirmed by articles in Le Devoir, The Gazette, La Press, Journal de Montreal, etc., for example:

" Ces découvertes sont survenues quelques heures après que l"identité d"une première victime a été confirmée. Il s"agit de Camille Maheux, âgée de 76 ans, dont le corps avait été retrouvé dimanche dernier.

" Les autorités n"ont toutefois pas l"intention de donner plus de détails sur les circonstances entourant son décès ou son identification. " C"est vraiment par respect pour sa famille et ses proches, et également, pour protéger la confidentialité des éléments d"enquête ", a expliqué l"inspecteur David Shane, du Service de police de la Ville de Montréal (SPVM), jeudi matin ". (Devoir) ".

My personal impression may be too subjective (incorrect), but, when I approached rue St.-Pierre and continued towards Place Royal (and later), I was astonished by such a heavy (excessive!) police presence around St.-Pierre, du Port, Caliere, d'Youville, Place Royal, and other streets for shielding the post-arson works at a relatively small three-storyed building. Again, I might be wrong in my calculations, but it seems that I noted around 15 police vehicles around, and 7 police cars passed by. Again, my knowledge about such things might be incomplete, but - for my naïve understanding - police barriers and cordon perimeters 2-3 blocks (streets) away from the site of the fire signify about a cover-up operation: to prevent the general public and activists like me seeing something very important.

I may speculate, but it seemed to me that some police vehicles were placed at particular spots before the cordons' perimeter (outside) - for blocking the most important view. For example, a black police car 13-7, already familiar to me, was placed near the Boutique du Musee (at Place Royal - d'Youville corner), looking like not belonging to the practical operation connected to the arson, but performing a different function. It was an exact spot for seeing what is going on around Pointe-à-Calière.

Not the public should be blamed for speculations and insinuations, but the secrecy around this tragedy in Old Montreal on 16 Mar. 2023. The weirdest theories are circulating around (like a supposition that the arson was caused by 2 incendiary and hollow-charge shells fired from the roof of Pointe-à-Calière; or like a hypothesis that a jet fired 2 rockets at the building - to kill a neuroscientist An Wu (31 years old), who came to Montreal for a conference to make a sensational announcement, which (as was anticipated) will enrage VERY influential people).

6. Moving around, I was perplexed by some puzzled activity from all sides of Pointe-à-Calière. This museum is standing perpendicularly to the burned building, divided from it by small street Calière, by another 3-storey building next to Pointe-à-Calière, and by one more (2-storey) building.

Heavy machinery (tracks, tractors, excavators, etc.) was placed at the south side of de la Commune not near du Port, but after Place Royal - till St.-Suplice.

There were 2 or 3 police officers at the left side of the traffic area next to museum's dead wall and further, and a group of some king of workers or firefighters were standing at the left border of the pavement on the traffic area, inside and outside of road works-like fences. Several men in black were in a whirl around the backdoor of Pointe-à-Calière, which could suggest some strange covert operation outside and inside the museum, weirdly connected to the arson at rue du Port.

From another side of the museum (d'Youville - Caliere), few groups of workers and firefighters, who - obviously - did not want to be observed, had some sort a very hectic activity, but not at the scene of the tragedy, and right near the museum; three other firefighters were watching them as if kept a lookout (laid chickie). (At least, it is my impression from the photos).

The rue d'Youville was literary packed by police cars, which surrounded the burned building from all sides. Such an astonishing number of special cars and special people, obviously not a part of the after-arson operation, made an impression that some of these cars and people were placed there to curtain off the scene, or, in other words, to hide something.

Then a new group of firefighters and workers rushed to the first group - to help them moving something heavy. I spotted a huge white object between the columns of the museum Pointe-à-Calière, and other objects besides the walls of the museum. The photos give an impression that a huge metal door-shield of the admission entrance of the museum was open up, but I did not show this photo to experts yet. Another unsolved question: are the firefighters (on the photos), taking something out from inside the museum, or moving something in?

Considering the distance, which separated the museum and the burned building, such an intensive activity from all sides of the museum was not expected, and, thus, the museum is perceived as the second site of the same arson. Considering that there is no damage of the museum - it is just weird.

7. I saw a blue placard on the wall of the destroyed (by the arson) building: Sotheby's - International Realty - Quebec - Randy Naami - ...3.5000.

8. All these facts and observations are provoking the worries that this heritage building may be never restored in its pre-arson (April 2023) view, and, in the worse scenario, will be even demolished - to please the same construction mafia figurants' appetites, who, as theoretically not excluded, deliberately burned it on March 16, 2023...


On my way to the Old City (19 Mar. 2023), I noticed 7 police cars in the distance, and their density was increasing closer to the Old City. If it was an intimidation, it means that someone did not want me in the Old City of Montreal. I also noticed a car with a familiar Nouv LR logo at the main key-point (under the bridge). I don't know about this particular car, but 2 other such cars were used to spy on me around my home, and at the exit from Metro. One of them (Nissan Rogue, metallic color) appeared on my way home from the computer store, which I described in this chronicle (see under 2003).

Then, very near the Old City, I noticed not exactly a police cruiser, but a car that belongs to the same department (w. Nissan SV 134 164 04, FPT5864).

This car was already known to me, and the woman-driver is also looked familiar.


At de la Commune Street I saw an Amazon bus; there are rumors that some of such buses are used for spying on dissidents. The bus was standing exactly in the area of the tragic arson in the Old City, close to du Port. There was also a police officer, and a black Chrysler car, such as often used for undercover police operations.


A police car 3-1 was placed behind this black Chrysler, and the second police car - a bit further, near the museum.


The police car 1-3 stopped me (intercepted) 2 times, and participated in police surveillance and intimidation 4 or 6 times (or, more likely, 2-3 times): for example, on 14-09-2013, at 12:50, in Cote-des-Neiges area. The police cruiser 30-8 is most likely carries a police supervisor.


When I decided to go down to the passage along the Old Port (to try to see something from there against rue du Port), I spotted a designated police ribbon that blocked the way. Just minutes ago I observed a woman running along the bicycle tray here, and now it was blocked: like it was closed just seconds ago for not allowing ME to pass.


The black police car 13-7, also familiar to me, was placed near the Boutique du Musee (read above).


Meanwhile, this sector of the Old City, with the burned building, produced a chilling impression on me, as in April, when I felt that something appalling is going to happen there. Some other-worldly emanation was flowing from the scene of the tragedy, deeply disturbing and depressing, sending a wave of an irresistibly overwhelming fear and profound sorrow. Even the knowledge and awareness that there - in the ruins - must lay dead bodies of the victims that died a terrible death: cannot explain that dreadful immaterial wind. I only read in books, and watched in films how the personages had the same chilling impulse on the scenes of the most awful crimes.


Another police car with the flash lights - 12-9 - was stationed near Pointe-à-Calière at d'Youville.


Three people were standing after the police cordon, near the West edge of the museum: probably, unfortunate relatives of the victims. Their figures were sending a chilling wave of grief and sorrow.


Coming back to de la Commune, I noticed that the police vehicle 3-1 was "covertly" replaced by another police car - 15-9, which now occupied the same parking spot. The fact that it was done while I was absent for a relatively short time, and that the both vehicles are very alike, provoke a suggestion that this particular car arrival has to do something with me. While the police car 3-1 was involved in only 2 incidents (when I was stopped and interrogated by police), the police cruiser 15-9 was involved in DOZENS of similar incidents, including demonstrative surveillance, escorts, stoppings, calls from this police car, etc. The police car 15-9 is one of 3 police vehicles, which most actively participated in interceptions, intimidation, and demonstrative surveillance.


While before the arrival of this car, the way to the site of the arson was blocked by merely a red cordon ribbon, a policewoman from the police car 15-9 enforced the blockage exactly when I came back to de la Commune.


When I approached the old fire-station at d'Youville, the police car (9-3) was standing on the pavement, beside a group of people: most likely, also members of the families of the victims.

However, this car (9-3) immediately moved backwards and blocked the street exactly at my arrival.


At the left strip of d'Youville, more police cars were stationed, including 21-3 and 16-1.

On the walls, on the trees, or on the columns: were red circles stickers for some reasons.


I stayed around 20 min. on the corner of St.-Pierre and d'Youville, and did not notice any new movements of the police cars, but as soon as I left, going home, 4 police cars passed me over right away - on the corner of Place d'Youville and McGill: a big black police Ford FRK4015; white police car 31-7 (Ford FKW4873); and 2 other white police cruisers.


I also noticed a crossover big black Ford 567 YYM, for its potential co-maneuvers with the police. However, if I am mistaken, I am apologizing for "splashing" this car's id.


When, on 22 Mar. 2023, I walked from home to the plaza on the corner of Atwater and St.-Catherine, I was followed (near home) by a "fake" taxi. I call it a "fake taxi", because there was a private-form number on its license plate, instead of something like T11141D. It was, most likely, E08-VWF. The same taxi appeared later, near rue Notre-Dame (a key point).


Near the bridge (the major key point!), I was "intercepted" by a police car; most likely, it was 15-9.


At the next key point after Notre-Dame, on the corner of Atwater-St.-Jacques, a black Chrysler slowly turned right from St.-Jacques. First of all, this model is rare in Montreal; then - it happened (again) at the key point; thirdly, such cars are used more often for surveillance purposes; besides, several times, such cars were spying on me; and, finally, I spotted the same car in Old Montreal in midst of the police operation (see above).


Under the bridge (another key point!) I was "intercepted" by a next police car: Inspection, 19776 (...), white KIA FVA6006. Besides, there was a municipal car (also a kind of police) with flash lights, and a Telus car.


On the corner of Atwater-Rene-Levesque (next key point), I was "intercepted" by a known to me black car (Toyota), which, I suspect, is used for surveillance purposes.


Then, on the corner of Atwater-St.-Catherine, the police car 15-11 (Dodge W. FMF9595), was "waiting on me" at the destination point.


This police vehicle is one of 3 police cars, which were involved in the overwhelming majority of incidents, when I was demonstratively intimidated, surveilled, escorted, stopped and interrogated by police. Now, tell that its presence here was "coincidental"!


First of all, the police cruiser 15-11 does not "belong" here, because the location of the police station number 15 is in Pointe-St.-Charles, not Westmount. Often walking up the streets Green, Atwater, or Guy, to downtown and Westmount, I almost never seen police cars 15-... North of (after) St.-Antoine.


At the same time and at the same corner, an Amazon bus was turning from St.-Catherine to Atwater, and continued down after Rene-Levesque. When I left the Alexis Nehon Plaza later, the same bus was standing at the Tupper Street - Atwater spot, which gave a good view of my movements.


When I approached Atwater - Rene-Levesque, I saw a police car in the distance, supposedly, the same 15-11, and, approaching Atwater - St.-Antoine (the 1-st intersection after a long-long slope!), I spotted a police car behind, suggesting that it might be the same police car 15-11. Being curious - what will do a policeman behind its (15-11) steering wheel if I speed up and turn left at St.-Antoine (pretending that I am not going home, but trying to escape from the police surveillance) - I went (along St.-Antoine) towards rue Vinet, and, then, continued to descend along the Vinet Street towards Notre-Dame. Before the corner of Vinet and av. Lionel Groulx, I deliberately stopped, and waited 2 minutes, and, when I continued walking after av. Lionel Groulx, the same police car 15-11 crossed the same intersection behind my back.


Then, using the backyards passages, where a police car could not pass (and also small streets), I approached the bridge over the Lachine canal (rue Charlevoix): the MAIN KEY POINT.


Right here, another, a more "serious", police vehicle appeared on the bridge: a big white crossover RCMP 211 FRY5110 (tell me it was a "coincident"!). (See below)


Being right near my home, I spotted a white car like a police cruiser, but, because of the distance, I was not sure this time. At the same moment, an Amazon bus approached to the corner, and turned to my street, passing my house and me.


The intimidation did not stop even inside my home. A letter from the municipal office was inserted right into my door. There is no clearance-gap there; it is impossible to insert an envelope like this without opening the door by a key. I attempted to pull it out, but could not, because the envelope was too clamped by the door. I pulled with all my force, but the envelope was sitting firmly. I could get it out ONLY when I opened the door by my key. When I closed the door (still standing outside my apartment) and attempted to shove it back between the lintel and the door, it struck out. It means that someone had to open the door first, and only then, without closing it, to place the envelope between the lintel and the door, and then to slam the door. In other words, an intruder illegally visited our apartment and left a sign about it (the envelope as a proof), playing on my nerves.


All the time, for more than 20 years in this building, we received similar envelopes pushed under the door...


When I left for a walk, I placed the door rug inside in a specific position, to see if we had unwanted visitors. Now, judging by rug's position and shape, it was clear that an unauthorized intrusion really took place...


In one of the following books, I described the incident, which took place on 20 Aug. 2022, when my wife, and me, and our younger daughter - we visited our older daughter.

When our younger daughter drove us from her sister back to her home, a black police car, Police Laval 74 (or 174), Ford SVH, met us at the key point (at the intersection of Levesque Ouest; moving along Levesque O. towards my daughter's street (going east, i.e. crossing my daughter's street on Levesque O.). (Thus, it was obviously a sign of surveillance (it's appearance at the same key point second in second with us). Then, the police car turned right on my daughter's street, but to the North, i.e. - in the opposite direction to our movement.

However, in 30-40 seconds, this police car made a 180-degree U-turn, and started following us. It could happen only if the police officers received a command on radio or from another communication device to follow us. This black police car Laval Police ...74 (or 174) then followed us to my daughter's home, and went to my daughter's backyard - stopping there and parking behind us (no flashlights), without giving us any signs to stop on our way from Levesque O. to my daughter's backyard (which across the next street, i.e. a long-long block away). It means that the police perfectly knew our destination, which is also an undeniable proof of surveillance.

A policewoman - a young (harmonious posture; beautiful blond) woman - approached, and asked Marta about her owner's right for the car. Marta - pregnant with her second child - was very stressed, and this was not a good event for a pregnant woman.


I absolutely believe that it was not a "random" casual incident. Police can always find a formal excuse just for anything, but, whatever they might present as a pretext for this demarche, I believe that they were targeting ME. I am almost sure that this provocation was planned for a very particular objective. They want to destroy my warm-hearted relations with my family members, especially, with my sons-in-law. Both of them are smart, clever, well-educated, loving, and good men with an adequate ethical stand. However, people, who harass me, hope that the difference in mentality (I was raised in ex-USSR, and they were born in Quebec), and intimidation factor will brake me apart from my family. Indeed, the police attention is very, very scary for anyone, especially, in all today's post-democracy societies, where any government's partiality (not speaking about repressions!) can ruin anyone's socioeconomic status, security, and future. (It is enough to see - how they ruined my own life).


That's why, after the incident in Aug. 2022, I started to expect another similar provocation, this time near my older daughter's home, somewhere in 7-8 months (besides, the policewoman also mentioned 7-8 months, but I don't remember - for what reason). And the next incident really happened: on April, 20, 2023. (Here is even the same date of the month: "20"; and the same 1-st letter of the month: "A"-ugust; "A"-pril). Around 17:00 - 17:10, I went out (from my older daughter's house) to the terrace, with my 5 y.o. granddaughter. In this very moment (almost second in second) a police car turned to our street, and the policeman-driver approached the house (sitting in the car). He applied the brake, slowing down, and menacingly gazed at me, then ride away. When this police car started to move away further and further, I took out my small pocket photo-camera, and made one shot, immediately putting the camera back into the pocket. I did not look into the viewfinder; I did not take the camera up to my face: I did the photo some cm from above terrace's wooden railing. You don't must be an expert to see it from the photo (see below).


Let's stress: I photographed the car clandestinely; the black small pocket camera represented an unremarkable object against my black jacket. How could the policeman see that I am photographing something? Plus, this is not the full photo, but a crop; on the full photo one can see that the car is already considerably far away. (Even if I would openly photograph the street, who could say for sure that I am not taking photos of the street in general, but, instead, targeting the car?) Besides, the policeman was behind the steering wheel, and needed at least a minimal attention for the road!


Then (when the police car already disappeared in the distance), my granddaughter demanded to make some photos of her, and I pulled out the camera again.


When the police car returned, I was holding the camera in my hands, speaking to my granddaughter, and, thus, the police officer now had a formal pretext to ask me why I photographed his police car - even if he (in reality) did not see actually that I made a photo of this police car.


He just started to interrogate me, when my son-in-law jumped out from the house to the police officer, explained something, and the policeman drove away. I don't know - what exactly my son-in-law did say, and did not want to ask him.


If this was an isolated incident - my close ones would not react so stressfully, but because police harassment if going on for many years, my wife was so frightened that we were afraid that she might have a stroke. The child was also frightened, and the whole family terrorized.


See below: the police officer interrogates me (I kept the camera between the planks of the railing, and the police officer could not see that I made - again - one photo). [Because there is a small chance that THIS particular incident could happen accidently, and this police officer was just doing his job, not participating in routine spying (on me) and intimidating, I blackened his face, preventing it from be seen by the public.]


(see below)


Now, let's analyze - what exactly happened, and what are the chances that this was a pre-planned terror attack provocation.


I believe that this case is different from the incident with black police car, Police Laval 74 (or 174), Ford SVH, which was an obvious provocation. Here the chances are 50 x 50 (as it seems to me).


First of all, I took this police car for another car. During last 2 months, another white police car with the same color scheme and emblems, was harassing me in the same area, around Metro and bus station, and on my way to my daughters. Only from the photos - I could understand that another car is a car of a different model (and, probably, different brand). That (another) police officer used to block my way; or to open his car's window as if he wants to question me; or used to place his car at one of the parallel streets (or in parking lots) - to show that he's watching me; etc. Once I memorized the board number of the "intimidating" police car, but forgot to write it down later. Another time, I wrote it down, but the peace of paper was lost somewhere. I managed to take a photo of this car from behind, but, because of low quality of the photo-camera, and of the weather and light conditions, this single photo came out non-sharp and blurry. So, now I took a photo of THIS police car hoping to clear the identity of that intimidating police cruiser.


Besides, this police officer (from the car 272) also has a moustache and a small beard, and he's in the same age and build, and, still, I think, these are two different men, because every time I recall the face of that (another) policeman, I doubt that it is the same person.


In addition, unlike the police car Police Laval 74 (or 174), Ford SVH, which appeared "on the horizon" multiple times, this car (Mascouche Police 272) was never noticed before (or just was not identified), and, if so, this car (and its driver-policeman) is not a part of the police-state terror against people like me.


However, the circumstances still provoke too many questions.


1. This police car materialized exactly when I went out from the house, and was alone (only with the child; without any other adult from my family).


2. This police car came with a possible provocation EXACTLY in around 8 months - as I previsioned, and as the policewomen said.


3. This police car appeared near my older daughter's home on the "20" of the month - and the previous provocation at my younger daughter's home also happened on the same day; and both months (August and April) have first letter "A". I know from my sad experience that the government officials just adore playing similar dirty tricks.


4. This - next - incident happened on my wedding anniversary (and I know from my sad experience that the government officials just adore playing similar dirty tricks).


5. When this police car approached to my daughter's house, the policeman-driver almost stopped the car, and - as it seemed to me: gazed at me in an unfriendly manner. If it was not my overreaction (not my imagination), then it means that he deliberately provoked me to photograph his car (for getting an evidence of police intimidation).


6. It is very doubtful that the police officer could see in the mirror (look at the photo above) that I photographed him (took only 1 shot): he was far away; he was driving the car; my black camera is small; my black camera was imperceptible against the background of my black jacket; I was holding the camera down, not at the level of my face, hiding its lower part behind the railing.


7. It is a very controversial reaction (and reason) for a police officer to interrogate someone, who did no wrong things, just took photos of his police car, and this in case - when it is abundantly clear that a person is actually taking photos of a police car. However, in my case, there was no evidence that I am taking photos of his car particularly, but not of the street, and, thus, he had no reason to approach me and to interrogate me. Moreover, performing a U-turn, and going back for stalking an innocent person like me: it is already an offensive and intimidating behavior, which demonstrates aggression, and, if so, a violent act. Taking into consideration my age (I am almost 70 years old!): he had to think twice before confronting an old man. In addition, he intercepted me not in the street or in another public space, but at a private home, and, besides, I was with a child, and all this together is equating to an unprovoked and unjustified attack. To do so, he had to come with a MISSION - and he came with a mission: to bring a lot of troubles for me.


8. If it was an isolated incident, I could believe stronger in this police officer's innocence. However, after a brake in 6 or 7 years (when, after 2014 or 2015, policed ceased to stop and interrogate me innumerous times), they restarted to contact me directly since the beginning of mid-2021: stopping and interrogating me as before. I was stopped few times by the Metro police; once 2 police officers stopped me outside my Metro station (in the street), and demanded to show the Metro pass; then, at a gas-station, one policeman stopped me; then this incident, which I described above with the involvement of the black Police Laval 74 (or 174), Ford SVH; and so on. Thus, because this incident is fitting perfectly in the logical line (of other similar incidents), it is (by logic) was a pre-planned provocation.


9. The police car Mascouche Police 272 did not return immediately, but, at first, disappeared from my sight, and only then (when I was already playing with my granddaughter) appeared again. This means that the police officer did his U-turn only after receiving a command on the radio.


10. First of all, taking photos of the police cars is not a crime, and not a misconduct. Secondly, it is not my "guilt", because it is provoked by the refusal of Montreal police department to explain in writing - why I was stopped, intercepted, interrogated, escorted, searched, etc. by police innumerous times since 2005-2006. My complaints to police were taken seriously, and I was visited by two friendly police officers (one of whom was a colonel), who explained that the whole data of these incidents was erased from the police database, including information about (illegal) fines. And, because in some other Quebec cities (like Laval, Outremont, Hamsted, Cote-des-Neiges, ville de Quebec) I am framed, escorted, and intimidated by police more aggressively than in Montreal, it can be drawn a conclusion that the surveillance and intimidation by police is initiated on a higher level than the police department in Montreal.


11. Here is the most probable scenario (taking into consideration all above displayed facts and observations): someone of the police department superiors told the policeman from the car with the board number Mascouche Police 272: "Look, here is a guy, who likes to take photos of the police cars. He's now at this given address location. Go there and give him a good lesson". Another (less probably, but, still, possible scenario) is that someone from the police department, who knows my most typical reaction and who knows the most typical reaction of that police officer, told the letter just go and look at "that guy" (without telling - what to do). The police officer went and looked at me, provoked me to take a photo of his police car, and came back to interrogate me.


12. All facts and assumptions don't present this given police officer as a bad or a non-ethical person, but, rather, on contrary, he is, most likely, a good person, and a good police officer, who is just doing his duties (however, his energy would be much more efficiently used - if he would investigate or prevent real crimes, instead of be lashed on innocent people like me). I think that he was just provoked (like me) by the circumstances and unlawful actions of other people, unlike two police officers from the car Police Laval 74 (or 174), Ford SVH, who, certainly, were involved into a cruel unlawful action of illegal persecution and intimidation.


13. Instead of an (expected) photo of a white police car with the same color scheme, which was harassing me in last two months, I got just new troubles, but the whole affair was provoked by other illegal interceptions, repressions, intimidations, and surveillance by police and by some undercover people and cars.


14. These two (2) above described incidents near homes of my daughters prompted a new - and most frightening - development, when the police was instructed to restart not only repressions against an "unwanted" person (against me), but to start harassing victim's family members for their respect and support - naturally given to their farther, father-in-law, and grandfather. This is a demarche in the "best" Stalinist traditions, as the Stalin tyranny reverted and suppressed the most natural, the most human instincts and sentiments like family ties and love between the close ones. And now the same happens in Canada.


* * *


Medical crimes - as a logical extension of other repressive, anti-subversive, oppressive, and suppressive methods (automatically generated by the profiling-oriented system even without someone's malicious intentions) - have destroyed my health: my last fortress and refuge. Being attacked by "strangers", poisoned, hit by cars, or subjected to other traumatic events, I was denied medical help, and was kicked out from emergency rooms without any prescription, recommendation, and follow-ups. In the same time, many of my tests' results have been altered, or disappeared, or were incomplete. Such events provoked multiple complications, which made my life even more miserable.


Because the right to receive medical help is one of the most essential human rights, the "cancellation" of this right (the destruction of the public health-care system by the ruling elites) must be regarded as a part of the systemic obliteration of human rights, living standards, and social guaranties by the new neo-feudal oligarchy. It is extremely significant that the obliteration of the access to medical care is accompanied by the actual elimination of the right for an old-age pension and retirement.


The retirement age was revised several times during last 30 years, and the ruling neo-feudal elites have extended the retirement age from 55-60 years-old (depending from country) census - up to 65-70 years-old age (depending on country).


While the life-expectancy is degrading everywhere (in the 1980-1990-s the average lifetime was 10-15 years longer than today), and the old-age citizens become one and all (without exception) sick and chronically tired, this forcible labor for the old-age low-paid citizens is equal to the old-age population's genocide.


Today, people around 70 years-old are near their death, so, the governments force them to work hard up to one's last breath. This is not only the denial (for people) of the right to rest last 5-7 years of life in peace and in dignity; not only the infliction of the never-ended vicious torture (because, regarding today's extensive exploitation; corruption of work safety standards; so-called "health-care "crisis"; and the further poisoning of the environment - hard workers become infirm, sick, feeble, and sickly much faster than 15-30 years ago, and the forcible labor for people after 60 is an obvious torture); not only a broad-day robbery (because the workers, who work their whole life for the benefits of the society (and, most of all, for the enrichment of the rich), accumulating public goods - have earned enough for being supported by the state during the last years of their life; but, first of all, the return to the slavery, because slaves have no pension! And the fact that the richest countries in the world (like Britain and France) are cutting the old-age pension plan: is the most outraged.


All "excuses" like a theory of the "labor force deficit", or "the aging population" problem: are a blatant lie, because the ruling class could mechanize and robotize the production of good - and even some of the services 50 years ago already; to boost the birth rate; and to take other measures, if THIS was a problem. But, in reality, their real goal is their own domination as modern "gods", and the transformation of the population into the powerless (deprived of civil rights) mass of slaves, subjected to the absolute obedience.


However, even this is not "enough" for the ruling elite. They want to transform the medical care into a kind of prisons and concentration camps replacement: into a punitive and genocidal tool. And the documented materials of my further statements about my personal experience are serving as a proof that such plans exist.


In this testimony, I am not just describing the unfortunate events, but I support my story by real medical documents and other factual data, which base my statements on an iron proof.


Now, I should add 3 very important remarks.


While nasty persecutions targeted me, they caused a traumatic impact on my family members and left deep psychological scars, destroyed family's socioeconomic status, etc. All crimes that made me a victim also victimized my close ones.


The majority of medical doctors, and other medical professionals, whom I met, were nice people, and adequately completed their work. Some of them even risked their own medical career by offering me more attention or help than was foreseen by the formalities, or by disobeying the orders "from above". Medical professionals saved me from very dramatic outcomes and their gruesome consequences. Unfortunately, their heroic efforts and generosity were destroyed by their fewer dishonest colleagues, who, in turn, worked hard to ruin my health, and by the System, which squeezed me between its vices.


While I am unlucky to face these unfortunate events, I am lucky enough to be in Canada, where the System is a bit softer than in many of other states. In many of other countries [in the Northern Hemisphere] (even in some of best European states) my fate could be even gloomier.


In spite of all my criticism and complains, objectively, Canada is still an island of a bit more human atmosphere in the middle of the ocean of growing global cruelty and elimination of former humanitarian principles.


[In the next section (Book 1, Part 2, Chapter 1) - the main text body (which was already published in 2017 at Sergei Balandin's and Mashkow's Internet libraries) is supplemented by some of 2019-2021 descriptions. (This revision of my earlier (2013-2017) chronicle is presented without changing anything, but with adding some of the later events.)]


* * *


It is important to know - what sometimes made some medical doctors hostile or even furious. Having some common medical knowledge, and being capable to detect potentially dangerous health pathologies on very early stages, I am showing up at doctor's office with a minor at the present time, but potentially dangerous problem. This immediately becomes one of the main sources of innumerous conflicts and misunderstandings, because many of the medical workers perceive this as a violation of social and caste hierarchy. They believe that only representatives of the upper middle class and the economic and ruling elite are allowed to show up by a doctor with a serious problem, which just beginning to evolve, and - normally - can be detected only by doctors, not by patients. They interpret such a problem as "minor" and "not significant", despite its potential danger, perfectly realizing that later, when this "small" problem becomes a "major" problem: it may be too late. And because they are almost sure that a patient doesn't understand its extrapolation to the future, they deny medical help, having no remorse. But when a patient like me (who understands that this presently "small" sore will become a life-threatening danger with time) shows up demanding human approach and fair treatment, they become aware of their sins and wrongdoings, and that makes them enraged.


A denial of medical help by one of such doctors provokes innumerous further visits to medical doctors, diagnostic procedures, and years of intensive therapy, but all these complications might be prevented by a timely and adequate medical help (which was denied).


Moreover, if one doctor refused to render the medical help, other doctors more often also deny any treatment and diagnostics, in solidarity with their colleague, and because of the principle of the mutual responsibility and cover-up.


Almost all of my illnesses and syndromes are products of such a "solidarity" and cover-up.


Many of the crimes, committed in Canada against my freedom, privacy, dignity, property, health, rights, etc. - are bearing the footprints of foreign governments, agencies, companies, or private persons. Canada is still one of the last regimes "with human face" (like the regime of the Prague Spring"s epoch), and the majority of population is living here in (more or less) acceptable conditions. Today (Jan. 2021), when the human rights situation around the globe has drastically deteriorated, only few best countries may be compared to Canada. [Unfortunately, in 2003, we cannot support the same; and, still, most of the countries in the Northern hemisphere became even more ugly. And, hence! show me a country, which committed less crimes against humanity than Canada since 1940! Awkwardly, but you must find another globe.]


However, my case is setting a scary and disturbing precedent, which can be expanded wider, if the lawlessness and oppression would not be stopped. The worsening situation of the homeless and indigenous population, marginalized social, health, and age groups: it is a creepy reminder of such a potential perspective. The "judicial exclusion", like the "extra-judicial" killings, is a time-bomb, which can blow up at any moment.


My case is so significant also because the Canadian political regime allowed foreign governments to persecute and oppress a person that was located on Canada's territory and should be protected by Canadian laws and jurisdiction. Moreover, after becoming a Canadian citizen, I was continuously persecuted by the foreign governments in Canada, and the Canadian authorities - as before - gave the persecutors free hands. My case is so significant because the same foreign governments later completely subjugated Canadian state, depriving it of any importance and significance, of any autonomy, and of any independence; and, after Jean Chretien, Canada became a third-rate country, which gets nobody's reckoning. Canada's status now is lower than the former British dominion. Our very important problem here, in Canada, is that this country is abused by the foreign states, which only milk her and robe her, demanding greater and greater levy, and ordering to render the tribute more and more frequently. The tribute may be rendered in the form of money; or in the form of trade privileges; or in the form of permissions to acquire Canadian best companies, or to extrude Canadian firms and to become a monopoly (represented by foreign busyness); or may be rendered by lucrative offers to foreign companies; or by unfavorable for Canada, but very advantageous for foreign states foreign policy; etc. [See: suffocation of the Medicago company for the benefits of Moderna; 15 billion, paid by Canada to Volkswagen; Hydro-Quebec's planned cheap energy supply to Massachusetts; etc.] The "health crisis", the "housing crisis", the "food cost's crisis", and all other "disasters" are partially fueling by this vassal subordination.


Now, after this wide digression, I'll continue with the description of other events and items.


[END OF BOOK 1 ---- CONTINUED IN BOOK 2 (next)]

________________


Lev Gunin


THE PUNITIVE HEALTH CARE -

(HEALTH CARE AS A REPRESSIVE TOOL)


BOOK 2


* * *

The whole text of the chronological events and medical documents (under the name of "The Punitive Health Care - (Health Care as a Repressive Tool)" is available for examination only on the basis of the following contract between the author and the reader:


I (THE READER) GIVE MY CONSENT THAT, BY CLICKING CORRESPONDING LINKS AND ACCESSING THE TEXT OF "THE PUNITIVE HEALTH CARE", I AUTOMATICALLY AGREE TO THE FOLLOWING PRELIMINARY CONDITIONS [FOR READING]:


-- I am (at least) 18 years old.


1. I (the reader) is undertaking (commit myself) not to distribute the text of "The Punitive Health Care - (Health Care as a Repressive Tool)" - entirely, or in fragments; not to copy medical documents; and not to share the text and images without author' permission.


2. I (the reader) understand that the confidential information, which is contained in this text, cannot be used for any other [than the reading (extraneous; secondary)] purposes and needs, for any researches, essays, stories, etc.


3. I (the reader) commit myself not to sneer at open ticklish personal information (which sharing was induced by circumstances), not to savor any medical, physiological, or anatomic details, and not to use this text as a reason for mockery and persecution.


4. I (the reader) am warned by the author that, except for a number of obviously immoral (by definition) doctors' and medical staff's actions, other decisions and acts described in this "confession" are not subjected to hasty moral assessment because a) only experts can judge finally about their justification and fairness; b) explanations and vindications of other party are necessary. We also do not know to what degree the doctors were under an influence and direct power of police, Ministry of Immigration, and other enforcement agencies, political organizations, groups and persons - with their own ideological, economic, and propaganda interests, - and to what degree this influence impacted on their diagnostic conclusions and assessments of patient's state of health. Many of the documentary confirmed facts incontestably demonstrate that author's ideological stand (who's opposing to younger generation's transformation into zombie-biorobots with mobile phones on shoulders instead of heads; to electronic totalitarianism with its prison-like total video surveillance; and to the tyrannical political censorship) played nearly a major role in enraging the authorities and triggering the persecutions.


5. I (the reader) am warned that the author sees the main cause of the most dramatic (for him) events in the fact that the enforcement agencies and interested persons and groups managed to present him to the medical community as an individual incapable to evaluate his health condition objectively; as a health-consciousan (or hypochondriac); an extremist; a troublemaker; an individual obsessed with panic and alarm patterns; as a person, who is making unreal demands to the system of medical care - concerning his - allegedly - pseudo-maladies and exaggerated gravity of trivial indispositions. This smear campaign of defamation, scurrilous libel, and wicked calumny made impossible receiving an adequate medical care (and sometimes any medical help at all), and led to health undermining, numerous diseases, incidents, and unnecessary sufferings. Doctors also considered difficult to believe in continuous (not connected with each other) illnesses, with an interval of 4-7 days, sometimes rolling at the same time: as tsunami. They refused to believe in these sequences of illnesses' painful course, danger, and significance. This chronicle disproves such a prejudiced opinion, producing an incontestable evidence.


6. I (the reader) am informed that all negative remarks, characteristics, and facts' assessments belong only to the portrayal of criminal groups, extremists, and carriers of anti-humanistic, racist, and totalitarian ideology, but do not contain groundless generalizations and negative assessment of any country, ethnic group, or religion. The author is categorically against dismantling of any of the existing states, and against restrictions of the rights of religious congregations of any faith.


7. I (the reader) am informed that this edition partially presents the previous 2017 edition without any changes, and, thus, may not correspond to later view and opinions.


8. I (the English reader) am informed that some parts of the following English text of "The Punitive Health Care" - were translated from Polish, Russian, or French originals, and may contain primitive language, double interpretation, or puzzled meaning. Such confusing fragments should be compared with their originals in Polish and Russian languages (author's native languages) [2016-2017]; all controversial points must be resolved through such a comparison.


9. In the very last moment of this edition's make-up (April 2023), the author came across a description of so-called Havana-syndrome, and found same symptoms and complications, which he experienced when was attacked by an unknown remote weapon (3 Nov. 2005, 7 Jan. 2013, and 21 June 2016), and developed symptoms of post-microwave irradiation.

_________


THE CONTENT


BOOK 2: Oppression in Action:

The Punitive Health Care (the beginning of medical terror):

CHAPTER 1

CHAPTER 2

CHAPTER 3

CHAPTER 4

CHAPTER 5

CHAPTER 6

CHAPTER 7

CHAPTER 8

CHAPTER 9


____

CHAPTER 1.


Though this chronicle is entitled "Health care as a punitive tool", it is also about the tragic relationship between the creative natures and the society, which no era or epoch was able to "correct". Figures like Schubert, Mozart, Pushkin, Bach, Schumann, Van Gogh, Byron, or Mandelstam appear before our eyes: models of such a relationship, which terminated for them in a tragic outcome. I am not going to compare myself to great minds of the past: the examples given above are only striking archetypes of this phenomenon. The most creative natures have a "non-standard" (non-conventional) vision of the world, which does not "match" the "standard". (Read Sorokin's "Norma".) Idealized ideas of what should be the world (the environment) are quite often inherent in artists" idealistic mind, and these ideas do not coincide with the real picture. Therefore, even in such a "positive" (in spite of above-written harsh statements) country as Canada, which in our modern crazy world is (still) remaining one of the relatively humane islands, the tragic destiny continues to pursue me.


The ideal picture of the world in artists" mind so sharply differs from the world"s reflection in the real life that this divergence presents one of the most painful experiences, and also a source of an unreal, excessive insistence to society and to people. So, despite the fact that - in comparison to the corpus of my medical knowledge - my errors and mistakes, are, probably, very insignificant and rare, - their role and value in the opinion of ordinary people (including MDs) will be always hypertrophied. This happens not because there are more errors in my description, judgment and estimation then in the academic books, but because (unlike MY creative approach) a pragmatic, "everyday" person commits only "admissible" (i.e. "common") mistakes, or even do them (quite often) deliberately - knowing that, having written the truth, will go against the stream of stereotypes and taboos, dominating in a particular society.


So arises and grows stronger and stronger an unfair attitude to a creative mind, whose life - in the best scenario (an influential family; privileged property status; or a protégé role) - becomes more and more poisoned. Unfortunately, in MY situation of poor immigrant without any protection or advantages, such an injustice elevates a sad vital fate to the scale of Ancient Greek tragedy.


An "average" doctor, in the same way - as well as an "ordinary" (average) person - has - "in the head" - the same installation of "trust-mistrust" scale (and same reactionary reactions of suspiciousness and mistrust to an original creative person), which triggers an unfair treatment of extraordinary creative-minded patients.


For a long time not realizing that this is an unconscious reaction to an unfair treatment, I tried to "correct" it by an impartial medical assessment and medical terminology, but the physicians have reacted to my use of medical terms with even a bigger mistrust, and I did not know (by then) yet that an official doctrine suggests that the presence of the medical lexicon or jargon supposedly indicates an "inadequacy" of a patient. This is just one of hundreds of unfair and discriminatory theories and stereotypes. As my self-diagnosis started to become more and more accurate, more and more often some of the doctors were stubborn and persistent in challenging (and rejecting) them. The mistrust to my description of the symptoms and current problems led to systematic refusal of the necessary medical care; and - without an adequate medical help - my life has turned into a continuous torture. All my desperate efforts to escape from this vicious circle, including my fight for patient"s rights, only worsened the situation, having led to such a stage, when I experienced serious torments, passed through surgeries, which could be avoided (with an adequate conservative treatment), and was left with the consequences that made my life more miserable.


My health is already so undermined, and the medical care is so inadequate that my hopes for at least few years of normal life are quickly disappearing.


As in the past (Eugenics, Dr. Cameron"s criminal medical theories, etc.), medical practitioners are often guided (in their work with patients) by irrational, discriminatory, oppressive, or inhuman theories. I used to hear about a psychiatrist, who - as a member of a consultative committee - has confirmed a diagnosis "inertly shown schizophrenia" (invented by Soviet KGB and implemented for suffocation of dissidents) in case of his close family member, and only years later (after the collapse of USSR) he confessed his wrongdoing. One of the present tendencies is to pathologize certain social, political, ideological, or cultural discourses, and the carriers of some particular ideas.


The pathologization or even criminalization of normal behavior (and normal emotion) has been promoted and advanced since the late 1980-s (particularly in USA). Every sixth adult in the United States is taking one or another psychiatric drug. This artificial epidemic of psychiatric drugs consumption is targeting the goal of controlling the general population for preserving the growing inequality, oppression, and ideological tyranny. The health-care and the whole health (and, especially, the mental-health) domain became politicized in submission of the oppressive political institutions.


Our natural need to be sometimes alone is presented in the twisted world of the unprecedented ideological despotism as a mental pathology, and treated as a kind of mental illness. They call people - who protest mass surveillance - "predisposed to loneliness" "introverts", with the meaning of pathologization of the wish to be left alone.


They deliberately erase the distinction between the rejection of mass surveillance - and natural desire (for some people particularly or for everyone in some moments) to be alone, and between the natural desire of privacy - and loneliness.


No wonder that I became a victim of 5 illegal psychiatric evaluations (without my consent or (and) without my knowledge). Despite all the attempts to pathologize my personality, they did not succeed in producing any conclusion about psychiatric deviations at the diagnosis level. The last one (which also produced no diagnosis, and could not prove that I have any psychiatric condition) was so obvious that I filled a complaint (2015). I also filed a demand to: Centre universitaire de santé McGill, Access Information MUHC (Montréal, Québec), etc., demanding if there are any references to my political, ideological, or any other type of views and preferences; my socio-economic status; my alleged psychological, psychiatric, or neurologic "disorders"; my ethnic origin; my Immigration file; special remarks, like "social anxiety" or "delusion", "neurologic disorder", etc. (etc.) in my file at McGill University (or affiliated with McGill medical institutions).


All my demands were refused or rejected. I got no excuse or regret, or apology (for what happened). Ombudsman"s response actually justified all medical staff"s actions.


In response to my demand of information, I received several phone calls, faxes, and emails from the office of Access Information MUHC: from Dr. Robert Cox"s associates, and from Mr. Cox himself. My demand was actually sabotaged, because they did send neither requested information, nor an official refusal (which I could officially contest). After Mr. Cox"s death, I called his office again, but I was given no information about my file. Because of a sequence of dramatic events, and because I could not hire a lawyer, I just dropped it. However, recently (Autumn 2019) I received a new email from Mr. Robert Cox (who died in October 2018), which informed me that he will be out of his office. This bizarre email has crowned the whole story.


Back in October 2015, it was a strange call from someone who presented himself as a "lawyer" (taken unawares by this call, I did not catch his name). He claimed that he could bring "justice" to my case, and asked me, whether I was receiving letters from Mr. Robert Cox. In reply to my silence, he affirmed that - through Mister Cox - I will achieve nothing, and asked, if I know, who Dr. Arthur Porter is. Without having waited for my answer, he asked, whether I knew that in 2009 Dr. Porter has inquired about me twice. My phone"s display caller highlighted an anonymous call.


(Dr. Porter was a central figure, involved in the biggest SNC-Lavalin / Centre Universitaire de santé McGill scandal).


Something bigger than just an attempt to ascertain my intentions could be hiding behind this call.


The magnitude of medical crimes in the waiting rooms or long-care homes (etc.), the cruel treatment of the vulnerable population had become comparable with the worst war crimes and genocides. Nothing will change until everybody responsible for those crimes will be brought to justice.


The growing politization of the medical care system is an international phenomenon, generated by the growing social inequality; new stages of the reactionary neo-feudalism; social implications of AI usage; new intrusive technologies and mass surveillance impact; and attempts to replace political prisons and concentration camps by a totalitarian medical system.


CHAPTER 2.


I was actually deported from my native country (Belarus: a former part of the Soviet Union, disintegrated in 1991), after a long history of illegal and unjustified persecutions and harassments. My only chance to restore normal life and to start "from zero" was to stay in Poland (where I arrived from Minsk), or to obtain a permanent residency in Germany (before being deported, I already started a process of applying for an immigrant visa to Germany). Polish and German were my 2-nd and my 3-rd native languages (beside other origins, I have Polish and German roots).


However, at the Central Railway Station in Warsaw we were surrounded by the agents of another (non-European) state, who took us by force to their country. We spent almost 4 very hard years there, and could escape only with an indirect aid of Amnesty International (to Canada (1994). Canada was not our destination of choice, but, as we (victims of disinformation) wrongly suggested, an only country we could enter without visas.


For the truthful facts described in my refugee claim - we were punished by nearly 10 years of statelessness (having no citizenship at all), living without any certain status in Canada. This situation actually killed all chances for my professional accommodation and my musical career, and took away any acceptable socioeconomic expectations. However, I worked several years not in my professional domain, executing responsible and demanding professional knowledge, fluency in French and English, and good skills (in several areas) jobs [for example, I worked 11 months as the head of the computer department & Excel mathematical accounting templates creator at Tangotel telephone company]. I also worked temporary at university as an accompanist for clarinet lessons for a probation period, and piano teacher at Villa Maria College during 3 months, replacing 2 other professional musicians. But later my access to just any job was artificially blocked; or persecutions of my actual or potential employers forced me to leave them.


Work for Tangotel Telecommunication Company, Head of the Computer Department. 1997-1998.


Work for Le Calliere, Night Security. 1998.


Work for The Gazette newspaper. 1999-2001.


Work for Music School at Mechta Children"s Center as the piano teacher at Villa-Maria College. June-July, 2001. [Replacing a sick pedagogue, who was simultaneously teaching piano at McGill University]


[I could also present other payment checks from a number of temporary jobs in 2001-2004.]


All records about my work at TangoTel (in computer domain); in telemarketing (sales of newspapers); in software assessment (as a tester); in security field; in music pedagogy - as a piano teacher at Villa Maria college; etc.: have disappeared even from the database of Canada"s Tax Agency. Someone"s goal was to draw a wrong portrait of me, incorrectly presenting me as an asocial element, who was not capable to work, and has shown a mental profile incompatible with a normal social existence.


In contradiction to this forged characteristic, I was able to hold my job positions for considerable time, and was never fired because of my poor or negligent work performance. I lost my job at TangoTel (1997 - 1998) because this company was targeted by lawsuits, and disappeared. I lost my work at Le Calière [1998-2000] (at St. Pierre Street) because a new automatic system was installed, and my job had been terminated. I also worked at few temporary works, which have ended at the end of the term. Only my work in telemarketing [1999-2001] was terminated because (by unknown reasons) my sells have abruptly went down after a period of a very successful performance, but in telemarketing it is a natural and quit frequent occurrence that has nothing to do with mental or personality"s deviations.


Yes, my supervisors and colleagues were nice people, who made my work less stressful, but, on the other hand, they used to be responsible, serious, demanding and disciplined individuals, and would not tolerate any inadequate conduct.


In the 1990-s, I was a member of St.-Laurent Choir, one of the best chorales in the world. As a member of this choir, I performed with the Montreal Symphonic Orchestra, and participated in a number of very important concerts and festivals. (See below)


List of St. Lawrence Choir members, 1995-1996 (excerpt).


Participation in the legendary Mozart Plus Festival with Orchestre Symphonique de Montréal (Charles Detoi, Ivan Edwards), Summer, 1995. [Gunin, Leo: see the "Basses" column]


In 1995 and the 1-st half of 1996, my name was on the Chorus list almost in every St. Lawrence choir"s performance brochure. However, later in 1996, I could not see my name among the choir singers, though participated in all concerts. Ivan Edwards, a decent man and an amazing musician, promised me to investigate this matter, but, despite all his efforts, my name did not appear on the list. I was working very hard at my payable work at this time, and, simultaneously, I was working very hard as a chorister to learn the partitions" parties. Perhaps, not me, but others should judge about my vocal abilities, but one thing can be mentioned for sure: I never detonated, and many choral singers oriented in modulations and atonal fragments thanks to my lead. And it was a pity that - thus - my name was struck off the list. So, in 1997 (or in 1998), I terminated my membership in this choir.


As a pianist, composer, and vocalist: I took part in innumerous benevolent performances at old-age long-care homes, hospitals, schools, churches, or community centers.


I also participated in other innumerous charitable, non-payable, or promotional cultural events, festivals, competitions and concerts as a pianist and keyboardist, and won several prizes.


As a pianist, I have played (interpreted) and recorded hundreds of classical piano compositions, as well as instrumental sonatas of Mozart, Beethoven, and Schubert, together with other professional musicians, like violinists, trumpet players, etc. It is not my fault that I had no access to good pianos and good-quality recording equipment, and often the quality of these recording was poor. But it has nothing to do with the quality of my interpretations.


My interpretations of classical piano compositions, and my own music have a wide auditory of tenths of thousands of listeners, who visit my music videos' pages on popular social media web sites, and professional musicians express their approval of my work in their comments.


I had musical contacts with such celebrities as Celine Dion, or Laura Fabian; cooperated with such wonderful vocalists as Charlotte Avril, Sarah Albu, Faina Zayats, Gennady Michailov, etc., with the poet and writer Miguel Lamiel (who wrote a number of verses for my songs), and with a number of brilliant professional instrumentalists.


I am an author of innumerous musical compositions, including 3 piano concertos; 2 symphonies, oratories; circles of preludes and sonatas; quartets and quintets; circles for violin and piano; music for cello, trumpet, and other classical instruments; etc., as well as songs and instrumental compositions in art-rock, jazz, and in other styles and genres.


Back in my native country, I have graduated from music school for children and teenagers (8 years) [piano class], musical college (5 years) [music theory and piano], Conservatory (music university) in Minsk [composition], and Institute of Culture in Minsk [choral conductor, interpreter and head]. No mentally inadequate or mentally sick person could accomplish such long and challenging studies.


I worked as a teacher at music school for children (piano, solfeggio, and music theory) for almost 15 years, and this work required an adequacy, self-discipline, and responsibility. Besides other duties, I had to verify and correct homework, fulfill the plans for every lesson, etc. And, of course, I had not to show up late at work, which would result in losing my job. I also took part-time jobs as a musician and musical composer (at the local scale).


However, publications of my poetry, my musical compositions, my literary works, historical researches, and other works and articles became impossible because of unmotivated, illegal, and unjustified persecutions and intrigues.


Unmotivated persecutions forced me (an apolitical young man, inspired mostly by music, literature, and art) to take part in the dissident movement in ex-USSR, and to join the resistance activism, and to communicate with other oppressed people. My connection with famous Soviet dissidents and foreign journalists gave some kind of protection, but, in the same time, brought new risks and troubles. After developing my own original theory about the mechanism of social and political development, I was capable to predict future geopolitical events (almost unmistakably!) months, years, or decades in advance. It is possible that not my topical denunciations, but my very accurate predictions, my pacifists" beliefs, and my struggle for the protection of European architectural heritage made me a target of political persecutions.


Thus, I was deprived of normal life in my native country; in the country, where we were taken by force; and later in Canada upon my arrival.


Yet, on Canadian soil, it was significantly different. I was not persecuted by the state; I had a sufficient protection and security; and I was treated in my "civil" life (beyond the intrigues, provocations, and cruelty of the enforcement agencies such as Immigration) incomparably fairly then in my previous life. In Canada, not the authorities, but agents of influence of foreign governments and international organizations, have made my life so difficult.


Publications of my musical, literary, and other works were blocked; sales of published (relatively recently) electronic books - blocked as well; I was isolated, ostracized, and marginalized. With my fluency in several languages (and an ability to understand several others); with all my literary, historical and literary translation baggage; with all my musical compositions and my musical professionalism; with my pedagogical skills; with my advanced computer skills: I was doomed on an internal exile, facing isolation, living almost under a house arrest... Pitiful existence, administrative provocations and intrigues, police intimidation, and persecutions in the medical institutions - ruined not only my material existence, but my health as well...


In 1996-1999, when an eventual deportation to any of ad libitum chosen dangerous countries, where we had no citizenship (and, being stateless persons, could be expose to life-threatening risk), became a reality, I appealed to 16 consulates (Polish, German, French, English, Belgium, Swiss, etc., including the consulate of my native Belarus), asking for a political asylum (and for the restoration of my Belorussian citizenship), but was denied.


This means that even after the collapse of ex-USSR I was still remaining "persona non-grata", and this had nothing to do with Lukashenko or his regime, or with the Putin"s regime. It, rather, had something to do with some hidden figures behind the scene, whose orders weight more than the highest official political power.


This also means that other embassies refused to listen to my appeal not because of their countries" independent policy, or in accord of the policy of European Union or United Nations, but on the will of "invisible" gray cardinals.


During the same drama, our case had 2 additional hearings: in the Federal and in the Supreme Court of Canada.


In her speech in Federal Court, Mrs. Murphy (representative of the Minister of Immigration), supported the negative attitude of the commissioners to human rights. She turned a question of the legitimacy of our appeal into a question about my views, which she characterized by sharp "non-juridical" epithets. As well as the commissioners, she did not devote even one single word to someone else, besides me, as if not 5 people, but only me alone was sitting in the courtroom, and if only I alone submitted a refugee claim! She did not mention my mother, my wife, and my children at all!


Thereby, the officials openly exposed the mocking farce of that hearing: nothing else than a punishment for my beliefs; completely ignoring the rights of my family members, including the rights of our children.


Here is the Chronology of the events in our case:


November 1994 - refugee claim.

March 1997 - refugee claim rejected. (Immigration has severely distorted our refugee claim in its negative decision paper; this document includes such direct and indirect statements as a) nothing bad could happen in such a beautiful country like I* (NO analysis of the REAL events described in the claim); b) people who were taken to I* by S* and on S*"s expense are property of I*; c) people who did not want to change theirs believes and opinions are guilty on persecutions themselves because provoked them; d) no minimum confidence).

January 1998 - the Federal Court is closing our case on a ridiculous ground of Immigration"s "no minimal confidence" ruling.

January 2000 - a positive decision in response to our humanitarian appeal.

March 2000 - an interview, which made possible to receive the Certificat de selection du Québec issued by Quebec"s Immigration.

March 2000 - bureaucratic humiliations and blatant manipulations of medical data by the Federal Immigration (Immigration Medical Services) starts to torpid the completion of our case.


2 Ministers of Immigration - Mrs. Lucienne Robillard, and Mrs. Eleanor Kaplan, with - 1) dual citizenship and double loyalty, and - 2) potential or actual dual citizenship and double loyalty - not just ignored my direct appeal for mercy, but (having a conflict of interests) acted not in favor of my efforts to stay in Canada.


The Immigration officer, Mrs. Judith Malka, had the same dual citizenship (but a single, non-Canadian loyalty) and same conflict of interests. A compatriot of 2 Ministers of Immigration, she acted on behalf of the foreign state: the state, which actually kidnapped us from Warsaw, and which was the subject of my refugee claim. The Ministry of Immigration merely ignored all statements of one of our lawyer, who demanded to take our file away from Mrs. Malka, and to transfer it to another Immigration officer because of her obvious (ethnically, ideologically, politically, and religiously motivated) conflict of interests. Mrs. Malka has conspired with the embassy (having constant and open communications) of the country, which was the subject of our refugee claim, and which held us against our will for almost 4 years.


The Federal Judge simply copied the statement of madam Murphy. He declared (in the negative decision"s résumé) that as commissioners used a notoriously known by the refugee claimants' formulation, in such a case an appeal is automatically refused by the Federal Court. Actually - it showed the partiality in caustic, casuistic, and unfair phrases (and also - in distortion of the real facts and things) to our 3-rd lawyer. Besides, the judge"s name - "Dube" - already surfaced in our Immigration documents. The Immigration officer, Mrs. Malka, have communicated by faxes (sending malicious insinuations and our confidential refugee information) with the consulate of the foreign state herself, on her own behalf, but the copies and the responses arrived for some reasons to Mr. Dube. I don"t know, who was this Mr. Dube, but I suggest that this man - and Mr. Dube, the Federal judge: was the same person.


Immigration officials (the accusing party) declared that, because the state, which took us from Warsaw to its territory against our will, financed this operation (that actually possible to equate to abduction): we belong now to this state, and have no rights for the status of refugees. If we start with the similar logic, then any victim of abduction cannot appeal for protection... because the kidnapper ... organized the abduction on own account! Such formulation also establishes a precedent of legal justification of the replacement of the status of free citizens by a status of branded and deprived slaves.


By the time of the Federal and Supreme Court hearings, our file was already directly supervised by Ottawa [to be more precise, by an Immigration"s branch in Vegreville, Alberta], and (unlike other refugee and humanitarian claimants" files) was proceeded in a number of instances not by Immigration staff in Montreal, but by Immigration officials in Ottawa, in the Ministry.


So, before coming to Canada, I was a human-rights activist, journalist and historian with numerous works. My views and humanitarian activities made me a target of persecutions in ex-USSR, and - then - in another country, where I was taken (together with my family) against my will - after we were forced to leave our native Belarus. I deeply believe that my family, and me - we came to Canada escaping real danger to our lives. Our refugee claim was refused under exceptional circumstances and with a totally partial attitude. Decisions in our case were unfair, inhuman, and unjust. It was a pure political decision without even a slightest connection with real facts. Hearing and proceeding our refugee claim, Immigration officials have employed all possible (and impossible) illegal methods, abuse of justice and human rights. On top of undeniable persecutions, an obvious fact that we had no place where to go and tons of our documentary proof - justice was denied to us in many outraged ways. We have appealed the decision, but in the Federal court the IRB's defender - emphasizing security questions and other unconventional methods - literally forced the Court to close our case.


All immigrants (whom we used to know) were granted their landed immigrant papers automatically in 2-3 months after Quebec"s Selection Certificate, but for us it took years, because the Federal Immigration was sabotaging every procedural and legal process. They sabotaged and delayed the police clearings" simple procedure for many months, and would torpedo it completely, if not our lawyer"s (and mine) very active intervention. They sabotaged and stopped all procedural proceedings by the forged diagnosis "tuberculosis", and so on.


I submitted my complaints on Immigration actions and decisions to a) Immigration Complain Board (like attempts to cause damage to victim"s heath) [falsification and blatant manipulation of medical data can lead to a forcible treatment from diseases, which the victim do not have (it could be lethal)]; b) to UNHRC in Montreal; c) to 3 Ministers of Immigration (twice: in 2000); d) to RCMP [fraud, forgery of data (including medical data), conspiracy, inhuman treatment, deliberate actions to ruin my and my mother"s health, etc.].


Because our case made repercussions in the couloirs of UN Human Rights Commission, and became known among the lawyers as an example of a tendency to undermine their rights; and because Belarus has refused to restore our citizenship; and because it was problematic - where to send us on deportation order (as all the bridges behind us have been burned); and because Quebec"s Immigration did not welcome the Federal Immigration"s decisions in our case; and because it attracted the attention of public figures in Canada and abroad; and because of hundreds of other reasons: we finally received the Certificat de Sélection du Québec. This happened after 7 years (!) of hardship and a statutory limbo, which destroyed all our hopes for a normal and better life.


At this stage, a new Immigration dignitary, whose task was to sabotage our statutory procedure, has appeared on the horizon. It was Madame Elenor Morgan, a compatriot of Mrs. Robillard, Mrs. Kaplan, and Mrs. Malka, a potential or an actual dual citizen (like them) [possibly, a relative of Ad Morgan (the head of Ontario"s branch of JIAS)], a person with double loyalty, and a head of one of the offices of Immigration Medical Services in Ottawa. ALL medical documents on my mother and ALL official reports on my mother's immigration case were automatically forwarded to her.


CHAPTER 3.


The history of persecutions in the medical institutions starts right here: when our enemies have decided to use another enforcement agency, IMS (see above), i.e. to sabotage our normal immigration procedures. Just this fact alone decodes all other conflicts and bizarre events in the medical institutions as politically-motivated persecutions.


Nearly 7 years we were in a statutory limbo, in a hover, in an uncertainty, without passports and without any citizenship, on bird's rights. These years without the residency permit - have undermined our mental and physical strength, our social and professional status, and torpedoed a possibility to return (ever) to normal life. We had to wait nearly 10 years for the citizenship and a possibility to receive a passport. By then I was already around 50 y.o., and to start your life, your career, your social ascension from a blank page at this age, and not in your home country is already impossible. But when (AFTER receiving finally the Canadian citizenship) I planned a trip abroad in connection with a literary award, and filled the formulary for the travel documents, I never received it, as well as a reply to my inquiry. My close friend, who died young, a remarkable lawyer and a decent person, Miroslaw Jankowski, did (at my request) some studies, and then advised me not to submit my requests for the travel passport any more, and simply to "forget" about it.


Before going further, I want to mention my debt of gratitude to all people, who provided an altruistic, distinguished and disinterested help. Hundreds of fair, honest Canadians - Francophone and Anglophones, - gave us a helping hand. Neighbors; friends and acquaintances; colleagues-musicians; employers and co-workers; teachers and administrators of school FACE; parents of our children's classmates; workers of Post Canada; my colleagues at St.-Laurent choir and Mr. Ivan Edwards personally; and lot of other people (including representatives of the "stigmatized" professions - like lawyers, journalists, politicians, police officers, dentists, immigration doctors, most of the social workers, and even some of the Immigration employers, etc.) have expressed their compassion through their good deeds. Without such a massive compassionate help we would not survive.


However, a very small group of other individuals, for whom their political agenda and the cynical approach to the matter of things, and the obscure ideological platform, based on the dominance of the brutal force and the superiority of power - are more important than anything else, did a lot to reverse most of the humanitarian efforts of their compatriots.


Going back to the events of 1999-2001 (when we still were in a limbo), I must mention new intrigues at the statutory procedure stage, when the administrative, procedural, medical and other levers of pressure were applied to us. Each routine immigration procedure - for example, a work permit or permission extension for children to go to school (student's permission), etc. - has used to turn into a nightmare. We had to fight for each trifling procedure and for each small piece of paper, which other immigrants were normally receiving automatically (especially - after obtaining the Certificat de sélection du Québec). [In 1994 - 2005, such procedures took normally from 1 to few days.]


Unnecessary and expensive medical exams (Immigration argued that our medical documents were lost) and other uncountable mockeries made our life intolerable.


In defiance of all rules and laws, Immigration authorities have merged my mother"s file with our file (2 parents with 2 children) though procedurally and legally the file of a sponsored spouse of a Canadian citizen (since November 1998) - and the humanitarian appeal: cannot be "merged" together in no way.


Madam Representative of immigration authorities, Helene ROY, illegally interfered into the medical issues, without having any power, license, or legal rights to do so, and, on her request, Dr. W. Brzezinska (MD) made an untrue report (before my mother passed the medical commission!).


Madam ROY refused to recognize my mother"s marriage "because of the medical objections", but next day suddenly replaced this decision with another one, leaving us again in a limbo.


Here is an extract from my mother"s complaint to Immigration"s Complaint Board:


"In my opinion and according to my consultants' opinion, both M-me ROY and doctor BZREZINSKA have committed serious violations. Any decision based on medical matters was not in authority of M-me ROY, because she's not a medical doctor and has no legal rights to intervene in medical matters. Doctor BRZEZINSKA made a false statement (in favor of M-me ROY), which did not correspond to the truth. The truth is that I was never referred by doctor BRZEZINSKA to any cardiologist as well as I was never sent to do any serious cardiology exams, which required in case of grave cardiac complications. Doctor BRZEZINSKA never prescribed me any medication related to heart disease. She never told me or my son that I have a bad heart. The same is corresponding to another doctor's BRZEZINSKA statement about kidney complication. I was never referred by doctor BRZEZINSKA to any urologist as well as I was never sent to do any serious kidney exams, which required in case of grave kidney complications. Doctor BRZEZINSKA never prescribed me any medication related to kidney disease. She never told my son or me that I have bad kidney. When I asked her "did you find anything wrong with my health", she used to tell me that my health is normal for my age..."


By exceeding her authority Mrs. Roy intervened in Immigration's medical division's (Immigration Medical Services) affairs artificially creating medical division's partial attitude.


Here is another extract from my mother"s complaint to Immigration"s Complaint Board:


"I know that I am hypochondriac and easy-suggestible but I cannot control myself. Both Mrs. Brzezinska and Mrs. Roy knew about it and attempted to affect my health through their actions. In telephone conversation with Mrs. Roy (before the marriage interview (she called him), my son warned her that "my mother could overreact - and could have a heart attack or a stroke in case of it". It is clear for me that Mrs. Roy did everything for deliberately damaging my health. I believe that she was planning in advance to replace the initial negative decision paper by a positive one. It was only a farce, which goal was to put me under a stress, which would damage my health as much as possible. She used both my hypochondria and my tendency to overreact (because how much can a human being stand?) to impact my health's state. And she did it with cruelty and on purpose".


"When my son explained me the meaning of Mrs. Roy's first negative paper, I started to cry, my heart wildly pumped in my chest, I could not breath. I felt destroyed and sick. I have no doubt that it did a lot of damage to my health".


"It took me some time to recover from shock and desperation. Then I passed through required by Immigration medical examinations. Doctor Giannakis, who did the tests, said that there no concerns about my health. Urine and blood tests were in norm. Only when I went to do the chest x-ray a sort of misunderstanding accrued: because I could not understand the command - when I had to breathe. My son demanded to repeat the x-ray. Then we were surrounded by personnel's hostile behavior - and my son was told that Immigration already contacted them in impatience".


"(...) Individuals with a sadistic approach, who pathologically enjoy using their impunity, anonymity and enormous power to destroy innocent victims like me should be excluded from your Agreville's staff. However, it looks like I was specifically targeted by somebody in Vegreville, who deliberately gave my case to Mrs. Roy because new who she is and what she can do".


"When I received the first "medical (Immigration Medical Services) ruling" of "inadmissibility" I was in a shock. I could not sleep two weeks, my hands have been shaking, and I was in a panic. It is possible that - together with the actions of Mrs. Roy - that unfair and ungrounded ruling did an irreversible damage to my health. I believe that it was their goal. Don't ask me why. If this was not a pure pathology, then they might want to destroy me because of my refugee claim back in 1994 or to punish me for my son's human rights activism and journalism".


(end of quotation)


[This text was written by my mother in Russian; then I read it to Maître Jankowski in Polish, who wrote it down in Polish shifting some semantic accents; then I translated it from Polish into English.]


When I called Immigration, the same answer was given 3 times in a row: that our file "is frozen" "because of the situation of my mother". But - I repeat! - the file of my mother and our file (parents with 2 small children) were 2 different files! The pretext, which has been put forward by Immigration - a "potential danger of developing a terminal illness" - is ridiculous and absurd by definition. Any living being (even a baby) has "a potential danger of developing a terminal illness" by definition - because we all are mortal. A number of facts showed that the aspiration to ruin my mother"s health was possibly one of the purposes of persecutors.


Immigration officials were in contact with the medical center (which did my mother"s X-ray) before she came there.


In January, 2000 the medical board of Immigration ordered her to pass (for her own expenses) additional tests: the blood test for strum creatinine and the echocardiogram. "Strum creatinine" (the examination of the nephritic function) earlier already showed the norm. The heart function they already checked before, without founding any menacing abnormalities. There were no justifiable reasons for additional tests.


(Shockingly, this echocardiogram was ordered in 2000 to my mother to justify brutal and cruel actions of immigration officials and to ruin my mother's health, while my demands (since 2006) to refer me to an echocardiogram (regarding episodes of tachycardia, arrhythmia and "clamped" heart) - are steadily ignored, to the present day.)


Strum creatinine was in norm again. The echocardiogram has reflected some anatomic features known before (the doctor, who performed the exam, explained that abnormalities have the anatomic nature, and are not dangerous).


However, instead of receiving, finally, her landed immigrant"s papers, my mother received (on June 28, 2000) another Immigration"s ridiculous order: to send the summary of "the last visit to cardiologist". But, since our arrival in Quebec, she never visited a cardiologist! What could she "send"!? Dr. Brzezinska, our family doctor, assigned with Immigration, has never told her about her heart problems, and never referred her to a cardiologist.


The Immigration doctor, Dr. Giannakis, MD, and the professor-cardiologist, Dr. Gordon Crilenstein (a known authority in cardiology), and others - confirmed: The megalocardia does not represent any direct immediate threat to her health.


Dr. Creenstein presented an official report to Immigration on July 27, 2000. However, it did not satisfy Immigration again.


In September, 2000 they demanded to do new analyses, and to visit an urologist (this visit was scheduled by the secretary of Dr. Giannakis to November).


But this (again) did not satisfy Immigration!


On September 19 (2000) my mother received a new letter from another immigration bureaucrat, who demanded a report from her on how she obeyed the last Immigration"s demands, and accused her... of delaying and sabotaging the procedure. It was signed - L. Cawchesne.


Dr. Giannakis called Immigration and told that there is no bases for the demand to visit an urologist. They were forced to agree. He cancelled the appointment with the urologist: since the medical department of Immigration finished working with my mother"s file, and informed the immigration officer that has no other medical claims.


But even this did not satisfy the Federal Immigration.


Now, without any reason or justification at all, the procedural part of the statutory immigration procedure was suspended for an unlimited and uncertain time.


The officials began to cling to the police clearings, and, making the verification impossible, refused to answer, whether or not the police clearings (as the procedure demands) were received and whether they were attached to our file.


Since a particular moment the Immigration officials have stopped to sign their papers with their real names. Letters "from Immigration" since now had no appropriate emblem, or a sign, or a special paper, or something that would show that this is not a scam... When Immigration called us, the "private number" used to appear on the display caller. My demands that anonymous persons should identify themselves or should tell, who is assigned to my file, were always ignored.


Sometimes they signed their letters by such names as Jeanne D'Ark, Diderot, Napoleon Bonaparte, Honoré de Balzac... They did not mention their powers, rank or position. There were no marks like "the immigration officer", etc. Only Jeanne D'Ark and Honoré de Balzac! Here (below) is one of the examples (see the next page):


It is important to stress that from now on they addressed to my mother by the name "Epstein", though - under the Canadian law - it is mandatory to address by name specified in official documents. In all mother's documents there was (by then) only one surname: "Gunin". There are also other regulations that mention the importance of respecting one"s name, which the person specifies in questionnaires and wishes to see in the documents.


When (later) - after she received, finally, her permanent resident"s papers, and my mother"s documents were stolen on the bus under suspicious circumstances: in spite of the family name "Gunin", previously mentioned in all her documents, and indicated by her in all formularies for the recovery of the stolen documents, her renewed papers were, nevertheless, registered under the name of "Epstein". My mother often used to put her signature as "Kisin", or "Leszczynska" (on her mother"s line), but, contrary to her will, the name "Epstein" was attached to all her papers.


Here are my mother"s official documents before the authorities illegally changed her name to "Epstein":


[an extract (fragment)]


All other documents (medical and hospital cards, etc.) were also under the same name.


Anyone, accustomed with some particular practices and discriminatory or ultra-nationalistic religious ideologies, will understand, why this was so important to mention, and what this manifestation signified.


However, humiliation over our names did not stop here. In all my medical documents, my family name is inserted into a field (or a box) for a private name, and my given by birth name (Lev) is printed instead of my family name, in contradiction to all application forms, where I entered my family name "Gunin" into the field "family name", and "Lev" into the field "given names", and despite my several verbal and 2 written declarations with the demand to correct this mistake.


Normally, the family name is the 1-st in the RAMQ card, followed by given names (so, it should be Gunin, Lev), while in my RAMQ card, as well as in all my hospitals" cards it is the opposite: Lev Gunin.


There is a number (few digits), scratched on the monument to my brother, on his grave in our native city in Belarus, and the same number was assigned to my file in the hospital, which I visited most often till 2018 in Montreal. Was it a coincident? I doubt it. I believe that this is a part of intimidation. I believe that the members of the same religious sect (or community) back there and in Montreal were engaged in this type of bullying activity. And this is a key that confirms the correctness of my suggestions about the source of the most of my troubles.


Another particular feature of the letters from Immigration of that period: many of them were marked by the stamp "classified" (secret). I never saw such a mark on Immigration papers of our friends and acquaintances, who also received the status of permanent residents.


On October 26, the letter from Immigration ordered me and my younger daughter to undergo immigration medical exams. But six (6!) months earlier I have submitted my written request to Immigration to allow me and ALL members of my family to pass the medical exams (starting from the relevant decision with the appropriate letter and application forms (Med1A.doc). Immigration has responded with a sharp refusal. By then, the Immigration argued that only my wife should undergo the medical exams, and submitted the medical application form (February 2000) ONLY for her, having excluded me and the daughters. And later Immigration has submitted the medical form ONLY for our older daughter.


The roguish trick of Immigration"s officials - for the purpose of sabotaging our file - was based on the procedural specifics, because after 6 months such a medical application and medical exams results expire. So, up the time of a submission (by Immigration) of a new medical application form for the "following" family member: the period of the validity of the medical exams of the "previous" family member (my wife) - expired, and it could force us to pass the medical exams again! Theoretically, artificially extending the period of passing the medical exams for years and decades, they could delay the completion of our immigration procedure eternally; infinitely refusing the status of permanent residents and making our life intolerable.


Here (below) is an example of Immigration"s submission of the medical form Med1A.doc for every family member separately (and the refusal to send such an application for all members of the family at the same time), with a time gap of many months. The name of the Immigration officer, who ordered this decision, is omitted again (here is only the signature, which gives no clues who it was). In the document presented below we can see that the order to pass immigration medical exams was given exclusively to my spouse; names of other members of the family are not mentioned here (see next page):


One more example: the order to pass immigration medical exams, where only I and my younger daughter are mentioned. It is necessary to mention that this paper was sent after my complaint and the complaint of our lawyer about the artificial potential delay in allowing us to pass the medical exams, on purpose to provoke the expiry date for another family member, who received the paper for the medical exams months earlier:


Let"s pay a special attention to the signature: Jeanne D'Ark. In the letters from immigration officials, during this period, they used the following defiant pseudonyms: Napoleon Bonaparte, Diderot, Honoré de Balzac, Jeanne D'Ark... It was not a simple lawlessness, but a frank and defiant mockery over all Canadian and international laws. Such a sneer mockery by itself already turns any legal procedure into a farce.


Well, let"s imagine for a moment (though it is hard to believe) that people with surnames like Diderot, Balzac, Bonaparte, or Jeanne D'Ark really work for Canadian Federal Immigration. Even if that"s the case (though I am in disbelieve) it was a demonstrative mockery, because someone had to choose specially selected officials with such special names for accessing our file and for contacting us by their letters.


I also directed my request to several sources, asking if the conclusive note (under the signature) "for: Immigration Counselor" represents something unusual or bizarre, but received no response. Logically, if Madame D"Ark worked for an Immigration Counselor, this letter could not be sent by Immigration; or, if she was submitting her letter FOR an Immigration Counselor, then why it was sent to me, and why it was accompanied by a remark "Enclosed"? (Besides, by then I temporary had no lawyer, and Immigration was informed about this [I just occasionally turned 2 or 3 times to different lawyers in specific different matters]; also: if it means - sent "for Immigration Counselor", it should be printed into a separate line, but not like "Jeanne D'Ark for Immigration Counselor").


But this letter is remarkable also because it was sent by Immigration in duplicate!


Its second copy - an exact copy of the first - was sent after my complaint to anonymity, and, therefore, an illegitimacy of all letters from Immigration from this period: letters unsigned, or only signed by the initials, or with the type of signatures like "Jeanne D'Ark", or "Honoré de Balzac".


CHAPTER 4.


My younger daughter and I - we passed the medical exams on October 31, 2000. Dr. Giannakis told that everything is all right and that all should be OK.


Next day, after 5 p.m., we received an anonymous call ("private number"); as we were told: from Immigration. A masculine voice has announced that I may be punished for an administrative crime: an evasion from passing a fluorography and the refusal of treatment. It was so bizarre and unexpected that I did not ask: what does this mean?


November 1 (2 days before my birthday): I had a fluorography exam at Montreal"s Chest [Thorax] Institute (as was demanded by Immigration). This alone was a subject of concern, because we were deprived a choice to choose, where to pass the fluorography, and were directed by Immigration exclusively to MCI. I was told by the radiologist that everything is in norm and there is no bases for concern.


November 2nd: An anonymous ("private number" again) phone call from the consulate of the country of our last residence; we were informed that the police clearings arrived. Why then the Immigration (after multiple requests by me and my lawyers) reported, that they were received on October 17?! [Such was an oral statement by an anonymous (again!) "representative of Immigration" whereas another "representative of Immigration" persistently continued to demand the police "clearings", and my requests to present a written confirmation that the police clearings have been received were ignored.]


On November 3, 2000, with the requisite from doctor Ivan Rohan, I made a blood test that revealed some changes in the blood count structure, and, in particular, low thrombocytes, and an abnormal VPM indicator. A previous blood test (September, 2000) did not show any abnormalities; this justifies suspicions that the abnormal changes in the blood composition might be linked to the fluorography, arranged by Immigration in the very particular place (Immigration did not give us a chance to choose), at the exact time, and by very particular technicians-radiologists.


In December another blood test again showed deviations from the norm in the blood count. My blood tests never displayed any deviations from the norm: never before. As these changes happened AT ONCE after "immigration"s" fluorography, it is natural to assume that this fluorography had something to do with it.


On November 6, 2000, an anonymous (no signatures, phones, names) letter arrived from the Thorax Institute (Montreal Chest Institute - MCI). Addressing to me, the letter claimed that the fluorography revealed "a tubercular infection". "The Canadian Department of Immigration" - it was told in the letter - "notified Infectious Hospital"... etc. The letter ordered me to pay 400 Canadian dollars and to sign immediately a special legal document ("constat") for infected by an infectious disease non-citizen of Canada.


(In this particular document, and in all other documents" subsequent copies the most confidential information is erased digitally).


Second (2nd) page of the same document:


Third (3rd) page of the same document:


(see the next page)


Let's pay attention to the next fact: though this document is ordering "Contact me", i.e. it addresses to me from the 1st person, there is no indication of neither name, nor a signature, neither rank, or position of the one who addresses. Not only under democratic laws, but on the logic of legal responsibility - this document: is an example of total lawlessness. Let's pay attention also to the date, when the central document of this outraged provocation was signed. Even the Soviet colleagues of these bureaucrats did not fall so low: to date their dirty tricks for victim"s birthday. This is just one of many indications that it had a direct link to the Federal Immigration department: because Immigration officials had a special satisfactory pleasure to submit a paper with their negative decision or a deportation order, or another tragic (for an applicant) message on Christmas, New Year, or on birthday date of the recipient.


One of the most outraged and noticeable details about this forged diagnosis "tuberculosis" is that it was sent to me within the same dates range (3-6 Nov. 2000) as the documents of the illegal "decisions" about my mother"s "inadmissibility" based on her health"s situation (see below). It means that the attack on me [by the employment of the forged diagnosis] was strictly coordinated with the attacks on my mother.


This document (from Institut Torastique de Montréal) left me no choice, but to undertake an alternative pulmonary X-Ray, right after the Immigration"s fluorography, despite all health risks (especially: considering the blood test"s results (3 Nov., 2000), related the doubled exposure to X-Ray radiation, and this all was Immigration officials" guilt.


Below: a photocopy of the result of non-falsified [genuine] X-ray, made AFTER Immigration"s fluorography, which is completely disproving all Immigration"s insinuations about "TB":


(Below: is the same document with the notes of Dr. Zast.)


(I made this - repeated - X-ray as soon as possible (as soon as I managed to obtain a referral to an X-ray from one of my doctors: from Polish-speaking Dr. Sigmund Jast).


Since my arrival to Montreal, I already did other 3 x-ray here in connection with Immigration procedures - and all of them were in norm.


It is necessary to pay a special attention that immigration officials sent a note of an official inquiry to Dr. Jast, in which they expressed a doubt about the authenticity of above-stated X-ray, and even assumed, that, allegedly, even the requisition for this X-ray was not authentic (in other words, that I forged - so it should be understood - the very requisition to this X-ray?!). This demarche of Immigration can be considered as an attempt to put a pressure upon the doctor: naturally, after all, any confrontation with such a sinister enforcement agency as Immigration does not promise anything good. The blatant declaration about the allegedly forged requisition was a message to Dr. Jast that he could have an easy and convenient exit from an embarrassing situation if he agrees that the requisition was not genuine. However, doctor J [Z(h)] ast did not give in to Immigration officials" blackmailing and intimidation, and entered his note in the right corner of a copy of this X-ray that a referral to this X-ray was authentic, and that he signed it and gave it to me by his own hand. This copy of the same X-ray (post-immigration fluorography X-Ray) with the note of Dr. Jast, was submitted to Immigration by an urgent mail BEFORE an Immigration"s official - M-me Helen Quintalle (?) (November 22, 2000) - sent me her letter with an insinuation that supposedly someone else went to radiology and passed an X-Ray instead of me.


Here (below) Dr. Jast"s referral to this alternative X-Ray:


Thereby, she not only has ignored the certificate of a respected medical doctor, not only has ignored an official medical document issued by the respected radiology and radiologist, not only has ignored the principle of the presumption of innocence, not only has ignored my testimony, not only has ignored that this X-ray is corresponding to my personal unique anatomic features, and has ignored all other numerous logic and actual proofs of the authenticity of this X-ray; but also - in practice - illegally and absolutely groundlessly has already accused several people (the doctor, his patient, radiology employers, etc.) and the whole medical institution (radiology) of forgery, obviously knowing that this X-ray was real and authentic.


That is - she consciously has made a false statement, which could have the most serious and dramatic consequences for many people (for me and my family, for the doctor and other people), and could even lead to someone's death. In legal terms - madam Helen has meaningly made an obviously false accusation, understanding the whole weight and gravity of its consequences, which constitutes a frankest and striking by its cynicism criminal act. But madam Helen - she's only a tiny small furuncle comparing to the gigantic abscess of injustice and the whole criminal pyramid of government officials; and, unfortunately, the names of larger criminals, under whose pressure she has committed her crime, will never emerge.


Unlike anonymous, illegal and (thereby) illegal Immigration"s X-Ray and Immigration"s "medical conclusion" concerning the repeated X-Ray, this - real X-Ray"s result-statement - is completely authentic; it contains the name of the doctor (who referred to it), the name and the signature of the radiologist, and all other formal, official attributes. It contains my anatomic features and even "Mild Pectus Excavatum" remark that from the very beginning did not leave any doubts about the authenticity of this X-ray (even without its picture (the film or "negative"). Thus, followed (in response to my presentation of an X-ray from radiology Clark) Immigration"s "conclusion", that, allegedly, it was "someone"s else" X-ray picture: was an obvious crime from the very beginning.


As to the picture (not only the text of radiologist"s analysis), I, having spent my own money and a lot of time to find - the only one in Montreal - place where they did copies of X-rays films-negatives, have gone there as soon as possible, and have sent not only the report of this X-ray (i.e. text of its result), but also its picture to Immigration. The receipt of the payment for the copy of this x-ray picture, and the postal receipt (of sending of this copy to Immigration), and also the photo of the envelope (it was possible to guess that this envelope"s size corresponds to size of the X-Ray film) were sent to Immigration and preserved by me. Moreover - I have made not only one, but two copies, one of which I left to myself, together with the original film.


Here (below) is a copy of the letter from Immigration to doctor Giannakis. In this message Immigration have expressed a doubt concerning the authenticity of the repeated pulmonary X-ray, i.e. immigration bureaucrats have vocalized a suspicion that supposedly someone else - instead of me - went, and did this X-ray.


To Dr. Giannakis:

Since you have noted the applicant has declined F/u at MCI we require films are there on 2000/11/30. Was applicant's ID confirmed with photo 10) at the Centre Radiologique Clark? If so, submit this film as well.

After overview if necessary applicant may have to be referred to the chest specialist.


It is necessary to stress that almost a week BEFORE this letter (from Helen Q.) I ALREADY submitted a copy of the alternative X-Ray"s film to Immigration by an urgent mail (which supposed to be received in Immigration at the same day).


You don"t need to have seven spans in the forehead to understand: this letter is written by an Aesop language so that the applicant (i.e. I), and, probably, even a lawyer should not manage to understand, what is it fully about. What negatives - in connection with the date on November 30, 2000 - it mentioned? The Immigration"s fluorography made at Montreal Chest Institute, or the X-ray from radiology Clark, are not corresponding to this date. Moreover, the letter of madam Helen has been written and sent TILL November 30, 2000 - that adds one more stroke to this theatre of absurdity. It is ABSOLUTELY clear that the methods of immigration officials: were illegal, and included conspiracy and plot.


Besides, the instruction that "the applicant should be sent to the chest specialist": that was an illegal, forbidden pressure upon the doctors. Nevertheless, doctor Giannakis has not given in to this blackmail, has not refused the help to me, and, moreover, has sent me a copy of the "confidential" letter received by him from Immigration.


One more worthy fact: insinuations apropos "tuberculosis", apparently, were prepared long before these events (and, probably, not without the aid of Dr. Wanda Brzezinski, who, on unknown reasons, has "clung" to my words concerning just a minor cold (which did not leave any complications and did not demand any medical attention) - judging by the next remarkable document.


Doctor Brzezinska, without having examined (by a phonendoscope) my lungs and bronchial tubes (it also seemed suspicious) has referred me to an X-ray. I did not want to "be screened", because everything could be expected from the Federal Immigration, its officials and their people in the medical institutions, and the radiation is not a joke. Nevertheless, doctor Brzezinska has insisted. (The phrase she told me in Polish - the language of our communication - was remarkable: Musze udowodnic" Immigracje nakont Pana admowy [I should inform the Immigration concerning your refusal]). And I had no choice but to go, and to do this X-ray).


That X-ray has not shown any abnormalities, but, besides, there is one very remarkable phrase in the radiologist"s report: "any recent infiltrates". But why - in general - it was mentioned about any "recent infiltrates" if "any infiltrates" were not revealed!? Unique logical explanation: it has been mentioned in the requisition of Dr. Brzezinska. (The copy of the referral has not remained, or, maybe, I simply do not have it now nearby at hand). But, in that case, on what basis Dr. Brzezinska has drawn a conclusion on suspicion on infiltrates if she has not listened to the respiration sounds even with a phonendoscope? Another questionable phrase: "History: Immigration Refugee". But how and WHY this note has appeared in the MEDICAL document?!


(Below: a copy of result of a X-ray from Reddi Memorial's hospital).


(see the next page)


I absolutely do not want to suspect Dr. Wanda Brzezinska, who - till a certain moment - has performed many good deeds for me and for my mother (before going to conspire with Immigration), but if these conclusions are not deprived of the bases, and if I was mistaken concerning a COMPLETE faultlessness of Dr. Brzezinska in 1994-1998, in that case something went wrong for them by THEN, and, it is not excluded: because the radiologist has appeared to be an orthodox Greek (the one who understands, should catch my hint).


9, and then 15 of November (with an addition), 2000, I have sent a letter to MCI:


1) I will ignore this and other anonymous letters from now on.

2) The procedural requirements are violated, for Immigration should send a note to me or to my doctor, but not to the hospital as a mediator.

3) Having violated the procedural regulations, Immigration has deprived me of a constitutional law to choose where to pass an initial X-Ray, and, if required - additional checks.

4) Having ordered me (on behalf of Immigration) to sign a constat and to come to the Infectious Office, Immigration and the Hospital illegally treated me as a TB-carrier, without having any legal ground for that until the TB is not diagnosed.

5) The acceptation the diagnosis "tuberculosis" on the basis of exclusively a statement of Immigration - is a sneer at medical ethics.

6) It is impossible to diagnose "TB" by a single fluorography.

7) On November 14 I have made the X-ray which has shown that no pulmonary infiltrates or other abnormalities present (and could not be present 2 weeks ago).

8) Sending me compulsory for a forcible treatment into the Infectious hospital has for an object to subject me to the contacts with real infected TB-carriers and to infect me with tuberculosis.

9) For clarification of the situation it could be simply arranged an appointment with a "civil" doctor of my choice, or another X-ray should be appointed.

10) I have specified a variety of reasons (see the attachment) why I cannot be infected with TB and have assumed that a) the film was is replaced by a film of other person"s X-Ray, or that b) insinuations of Immigration do not represent the facts. (One of exotic improbabilities - and still possibilities: the fluorography was made on an obviously defective film).


On November 17 the MED laboratory CDL has sent me by fax a remarkable receipt, arguing that I should pay for a venereal diseases blood test that - allegedly - was done on October 31 2000. However, I never did this blood test, and did not go to CDL MED. On November 20 I have received a call from Immigration (a "private number" anonymous call), and was accused of concealing that was, allegedly, infected by AIDS at the moment of entry into Canada! Reacting to these insinuations, I have sent an inquiry request to Reddy Memorial Hospital archive and called there many times to receive copies of blood tests and X-rays, but have never received any answer. Below - is a copy of the document connected with the alleged blood test on VDRL, which I never did. This "thought-up" test has emerged soon after the 1st episode of Immigration"s ungrounded accusations that I allegedly have concealed "infectious diseases" (such, as venereal diseases (AIDS, etc.), hepatitis B, tuberculosis, and others), when entered into Canada.


Here (below) are the copies of the corresponding documents:


This alleged blood test corresponds to a requisition, which I never held in my hand. Whoever took it from Doctor Giannakis or his secretary was not me because I never saw it and did not hold it in my hands; I did not go to CDL Labs, and did not pay 18 dollars. Thus, made on the basis of a nonexistent blood sample, it was linked to a nonexistent requisition. As soon as I learned about such "test", I declared my concerns to Labs CDL, and they responded by 2 faxes. However, the administration of CDL Labs has blocked me an access to other pages (except of this receipt), refusing to reveal the result of the VDRL blood test. After my persisting requests for an inquiry the pseudo-blood-test was declared "lost". The handwritten mark in the left top corner specifies that this requisition was relating to the procedures demanded by the Medical department of Canadian Federal Immigration (Immigration Medical Services), or: it was issued on Immigration"s request (which is mandatory). And this, in turn, is a proof that confirms (in my case) Immigration"s "unhealthy interest" to the "urological sphere" (an indirect proof of the threats made by Immigration officials to infect me with an infection connected to this particular sphere). Especially, we must stress that there is only the stamp of doctor Giannakis, but not his signature! (While all other requisitions from Dr. Giannakis of this period were signed by him).


About the same time, the secretary of doctor Wanda Brzezinska contacted me concerning a rendezvous with Dr. Brzezinska at the end of November. I answered that did not ask for an appointment, and that now I am assigned with another immigration doctor. Then the secretary said that this rendezvous was issued for "a special matter", and also that I am obliged to show up. I responded that I will not come, if I do not learn, what it exactly this "special matter". There came a long pause... it was felt like she"s hesitating. At last, she told that it is in connection with a tubercular infection, and that doctor Brzezinska should, as my long-term doctor, "discuss" with me this question (regarding the tone, it meant: to "advise" me "to be treated for tuberculosis").


--------------


CHAPTER 5.


It is important to conclude, stressing, that - since the ill-starred year 2000 - Canadian enforcement agencies have conspired with the medical institutions to forge or withdraw the results of my medical tests and exams for political reasons, supposedly, on a pointer of one foreign state and its organizations in Canada. An access to some of my tests, x-ray films, etc. - was blocked already by then. Can we trust the medical institutions after SUCH bizarre events? As it was described above, on November 28, 2000, the Immigration concluded that a new independent X-ray from November 14, 2000 - is "not genuine" (that someone else passed this x-ray instead of me). And this happened when Immigration"s officials have already received the original document from Clark laboratory, Dr. Just"s statement, the original x-ray film, which had my personal anatomical features, etc. - and had no juridical basis and the right to doubt! They knew from the beginning that I went myself: and passed this x-ray with my medical RAMQ card with my photo! Besides, the Immigration is not a criminal court, and has no slightest right to issue the verdicts on criminal affairs, and also: abolishing the principle of the presumption of innocent!


When I was already informed that 2 Immigration"s officials told MCI that, allegedly, the original Immigration"s x-ray "was lost", they demanded the ORIGINAL of the X-ray made in Clark LAB. But I already sent a certified (judicially and medically) COPY of this x-ray"s film. [With great difficulty I found unique or one of few laboratories where make copies of x-ray pictures, paid for it the money - and sent in Immigration.]


Now they demanded the ORIGINAL, mentioning nothing that have already received its COPY. In response, I"ve contacted Immigration, and demanded that the original of this x-ray should be examined in the presence of me and my trusties, and then must be returned to me. By this, I indicated that their intentions might be to take both the copy and the original away from me, and to destroy them or replace them by forged ones. However, Immigration officials continue to insist that the above mentioned original must be sent by post to IMS. Now, to save the documentary proof that I don"t have (and never had) tuberculosis, I had to organize a very complicated procedure: to certify the original x-ray film by a notary in the presence of a medical specialist; to certify the sending procedure (the envelope with the film) as a proof that the Immigration did not receive an empty envelope; to take the signatures from doctors and lawyers concerning the existence of this X-ray"s original; etc. Fortunately, something happened inside Immigration, and they, finally, recognized this x-ray as genuine. However, then they began to insist that - even if there are no doubts about the authenticity of the "civil" X-ray - I should be anyway sent to the lung specialist and to infectious diseases unit"s office!


It is obvious that the manipulations with medical diagnoses are leading to potential unnecessary compulsory medical treatment, which can be health-and-life-threatening danger, and, thus, constitute a notorious criminal act.


However, both IMS, and the MCI staff jumped to it for political reasons without hesitation.


Only my address to the commissioner of United Nations Human Rights Committee, and the intervention of the United Nations stopped this orgy. But mockeries and persecutions have continued via other channels. The rights of our children (who lived by that moment in Canada 7 years without the status and citizenship) were roughly violated. My immigration advisers argued that this situation breaks both the international and Canadian standards. To my knowledge, children should not be deprived of the status after 5 years of stay and - in general - they could not be left without any documents of citizenship or lessee passé.


Not casually the decisions like a decision to refuse us the formularies for all members of our family for passing the medical commission were taken half a year before not at the local center of Immigration in Montreal (where our file should be proceeded according to rules), but in Ottawa, which mean a "special" attitude to us.


By November 23rd, 2000, I managed to find out, who was the author of that ill-starred letter from Montreal Chest Institute (MCI). That was M-me Lucy Gefroy (Jefroi or Joyfroid?). It appeared that she never saw my Immigration"s fluorography, and was only the author of the text. On my request, people found her phone number. [It appeared to be the same that was specified in the "joint" document of Immigration and MCI which copy is given above.]


I dialed Madam Lucy"s (Lucie) work phone (849-5201, extension 2166), and left a brief message for her with the answering machine, having given my full name and phone number. When I called her, I did not compose *67 before the phone number (to hide my phone number). However, Madam Lucy, when she contacted me at 14.15, used an anonymous call feature.


She has contacted me on her own initiative, however, to my English she persistently responded in French. Then I switched to French. She immediately switched to such a broken English, that it became very difficult to understand her. I asked her to continue our conversation in French, and was convinced that she knows, who I am, and remembers what happened to me. Then I asked her, whether she saw the film picture of my Immigration fluorography. She answered that she looked at the film and remembers what was on it. Then I asked her, what she saw: a weak or a strong shadow, from what side, in which place. And, if she does not remember precisely, then what was an overall picture. She declared that has no right to "disclose" it. And, suddenly, abruptly interrupting my inquiries, she told in French that my case is closed anyway, and it is not mandatory anymore to be hospitalized in the infectious diseases unit. One more detail emerged during this conversation. When I asked her, where the original film of Immigration"s fluorography is stored, she answered that cannot tell this to me. On Dr. Giannakis" request (to show him this - allegedly - "tubercular" - fluorography, Immigration declared it "missing".


My initial investigation has identified that the letter (3-11-2000; from Montreal Chest Institute on behalf of the Ministry of Immigration) about the "tuberculosis" (i.e. about this fake "diagnosis") was composed, allegedly, by Dr. Lucie Gefroy (Jefroi или Joyfroid?), and, by the logic, she has probably spoke to me on the phone. However, years later, when one McGill"s medical student (whom I gave few piano lessons) has listened to this recorded conversation, she identified the voice as the voice of Lucie Opatrny, who was also McGill"s medical student by that time. Living just near McGill University and knowing some of university"s students, I heard that Miss Opatrny was a vicious careerist and authorities" puppet, who has no moral obstacles to achieve her career goals. I also learned that Miss Opatrny studied epidemiology and infectology, and has something to do with Montreal Chest Institute. [M-me Opartny's name by birth could be "Joyfroid" - who knows?]


In spite of the above given information, I did not believe that a student (maybe, even not an intern yet) could be used as such a dirty, criminal tool for such unlawful manipulations. So, I excluded Dr. Lucie Opatrny"s candidature as "non-probable".


However, years later, when I started the 2-nd edition of this chronicle, Dr. Lucie Opatrny was already notoriously known for her flattery (toady to the authorities) behavior. Thus, it cannot be excluded (considering her medical specialization and connection to Montreal Chest Institute - which she might later hide), that it was she, who spoke to me on the phone, carrying out the cover-up operation. But I also have to admit that Lucie, who spoke to me on the phone was (by her voice - as I thought) 27-35 y.o., and Dr. Lucie Opartny had to be (by then) much younger.


On December 2, 2000 I took my medical plastic RAMQ card and the Royal Victoria hospital card, and rushed to Montreal Chest Institute (MCI). I deliberately came there at the end of the working day when medical chiefs (as I suggested) already left. Having shown the documents and having run on compassionate and sincere nurses, I told that on November 1, 2000, made a fluorography, and asked for a copy of the conclusive medical report, and also to see the original of the film and to make its copy. My request was transferred to a female doctor who went to find my medical documents, and I went after her. But, when we reached one of the floors, she, entering into a door, accessible only for the medical personnel, told to me to go to another (opposite) stairs, and to wait there on the same floor.


She warned that I may wait long. Downstairs, I managed to glance in MCI hospital"s archive where did not find not just the radiologist"s conclusive report, but even the record that on November 1, 2000, I passed the fluorography. Archive"s employees told me that - even if I made this x-ray for Immigration - the entry of this record should be stored in the computer and be registered anyway. They asked if I am not "confusing something", or there is something very, very strange. In my personal notes I specified that I learned "in confidence" from an immigrant woman, the cleaner, who used to have problems with Immigration herself, about "room number 28". So was told in a short retelling, and the wider description got lost somewhere on uncountable DVDs. Now - 20 years later - I do not remember, was the number "28" assigned to archive"s door - or to another room. But before I managed to come closer to "room 28", a short blonde man jumped out - as devil from a snuffbox, - and snatched on me. (How could he react so quickly? Who managed to warn him for only a few seconds - while I went down from the 1st to ground floor?)


- You will receive nothing here, fuck you! And you will be punished for your refusal to come to the tubercular doctor. - He cried out that all into my face with an undisguised rage.

- I was told that my fluorography both the film image and the conclusive report are missing.


He not simply turned pale, and became white, as chalk: so clearly he got a fright - as though just lost one million dollars, but began shaking. He disappeared into an imperceptible gray door (under the same color as the wall), which was opening right to the staircase between the floors - and immediately jumped out from there with a big paper package (my name and my photo on it), and with all signs of deep relaxation.


- Here it is! You should go to the doctor because you have tuberculosis.

- Are you sure of it?

- Yes, I am absolutely sure.

- I was told that my case is closed - and I should not go anywhere.

- Nobody could tell to you such a bluff. You will be sentenced for non-obedience.

- Your opinion on this x-ray image - is a mistake, Sir, or a film has a technical defect. Look - and let me to take a look.

- It is possible. But under the law - you should go to the doctor in any case even if it is a mistake. - Under what law? What law, what paragraph? Besides - I have the right to choose another medical institution, not yours, and go there to pass a fluorography, or to pay such a visit to a doctor.


(The conversation was going sometimes in French, sometimes in English, and I literally said "to pay such a visit", but this devil used the word-play "to pay a visit" - extracting simply "to pay", and rushed on me with real cries and with new force).


- You don"t want to pay, huh?! You do not want to give donations in hospital"s cash desk? You came to Canada - and want to enjoy our good life - giving nothing in exchange? If you do not pay the fucking money, you will pay by your fucking ass... bum!


Only much later I realized that he was able (and skillful in it) to use such a lexicon and such phraseological and phonetic constructions, which, being a pseudo-slang, would be perceived as a slang, and - at the same time - would be understandable to such a fresh immigrant as myself.


Among the threats (which whole stream had splashed out on me this medium-sized person), he promised me future problems with accessing medical care in Canada, and also with receiving medications and the referrals for diagnostic procedures and tests. I, naturally, left at once, but still heard a phrase thrown to my back "as such a notorious ideological enemy, you are treated even too well" (and, again, he used a word-play: "treated too well" - where the word "treated" had triple meaning: healed, treated, and threatened); and "don"t be surprised, if you will catch tripper".


All 20 years I, re-reading my own report on that ugly incident, did not pay attention to the form of the name of this venereal illness used by the hideous doctor. And just now it dawned upon me that, raised in Canada (apparently), the doctor used that version (which got to Russian from the German lexicon), which has especially insulting character for a Russian-speaking person. No Canadian doctor will ever employ the term "tripper" instead of "gonorrhea". It means, that this "devil" from the MCI hospital perfectly knew, what dirty and humiliating implication in the colloquial culture of Russian-speaking people associates with this word.


It is certainly not a coincident that exactly in the same period of time (2-nd half of 2000) I was targeted by an unusually aggressive and illegally persuasive campaign of extortion of money. Hospitals demanded to donate money in letters that I used to receive every day by post, in the form of papers that I used to receive from the secretaries and other personnel when visited medical institutions, and via phone calls every 2 hours. No doubt that it was a well-coordinated and possibly perhaps supervised by the enforcement agencies campaign. I would be glad to participate in the charity program if I had what to donate, but, unfortunately, from 1994 to 2000 we gave out everything that we had, earned or received for Immigration procedures and Immigration lawyers. And we lived in miserable poverty because of this. Most aggressively was demanding to donate in this period the Royal Victoria Hospital, and this was, probably, not a coincident that Immigration sent me for the mandatory fluorography to MCI, which is a part of RVH, and made a plot around the fake tuberculosis diagnosis with this particular institution.


This incident at MCI also has a special significance, because years later, in 2013-2016, another spiteful doctor, Dr. Brian Morris (urologist), stated economic claims to me almost in the same words, and, the most important, with the same intonations, emotions and hints. Accusing me of, allegedly, doing "too many" tests, and refusing referrals for blood and urine tests, this doctor shouted that supposedly each test costs so much and so much, and that I "rob" the Canadian state for these sums. During 25 years in Canada I never heard that a medical doctor told his patient (who had no private insurance) that his patient is a "robber" because he"s using Canadian universal Medicare, or because he"s doing "too many" tests (we know that the MD-s order the tests, not a patient, and they order the tests according to the necessity). An only possible explanation is that Dr. Morris did not tolerate my Canadian citizenship, and even my presence in this country, because even people who do not have Canadian citizenship, even prisoners (criminals) - have the right for medical care. This line goes directly to my Immigration file and its particular details, which Dr. Morris was familiar with for sure. He was politically-motivated when denied me tests and exams to track down an infection and bleeding, and deliberately provoked a chronic infection, formation of stones and other catastrophic consequences that led to 2 serious surgeries and to a sharp blow to my health.


It is certainly not a coincident that, using a sophisticated language, the Federal judge and Immigration actually stressed that the state, which took us from Warsaw to the Middle East, did it for own cost, and thereby, we are not qualify for the status of political refugees.


There is an obvious connection between politically-motivated persecutions triggered by the Canadian Federal Immigration - and persecutions by some doctors: which incontestably proves that I was mistreated in medical institutions initially due to the same sequence of events generated by Immigration on behalf of a wrong political and economic doctrine-model, and applied to me in connection with the hegemony of anti-humanistic, anti-pluralistic and racist ideology, promoted by a foreign theocratic state, and supported by an influential "untouchable" "minority", which plays a pivotal role in imposing that model and within the global financial elite.


Since incident in MCI, more than ten doctors and some serious medical institutions committed crimes against my life and my health, which opened an additional source of hostility and injustice towards me, their victim. The cover-up laws started to play a role. There is a group of medical workers that conduct a smear campaign against me amongst other doctors in term to connect them to this campaign. I also know that the honest doctors (true to the Hippocratic Oath) were threatened: that, if they continue to help me, they too will undergo persecution.


Undoubtedly, English medical institutions (hospitals, affiliated with McGill university, etc.) began first to subject me to persecution, because the hospital MCI, the center of our conflict with the medical department of Immigration, and the Jewish Hospital of Montreal - are medical institutions of McGill university network). Special comprehension of MCI"s unknown doctor, who mentioned the venereal diseases in the context of the evolved conflict (concerning the forged diagnosis "tuberculosis") "expansion", his awareness concerning the term "tripper" instead of "gonorrhea" (i.e. he knew what dirty and humiliating implication in colloquial culture of Russian-speaking people associates with this word), a forged account with the requirements of payment for venereal diseases blood test (i.e. the test which I never did: see above), and the threats of immigration officials to infect me with an urological infection or a venereal disease: all this specifies that it was not an improvisation and not a casual threat, but some well thought over and developed in advance plan.


Therefore, it is easy to assume that the Federal Canadian Immigration"s officials, obedient to those who stood behind them, and subject to them doctors of Immigration Medical Services (IMS) - not simply threatened to infect me with a "shameful" illness, but really had a concrete plan.


The most probable that intimidation, stressful situation and threats were the means to provoke a "promised" to me urological infection by means of well-developed (since the beginning of the XX century) by security and intelligence services of all countries suggestive technique, in combination of simultaneous weakening victim"s immune system by means of terror.


I managed to "smuggle" 2 patient's records (hospital and polyclinic "dossier") from USSR - my own and my deceased brother. These volumes ("зшiткi" in Belorussian) in a semi-page format, with the combined results of the medical tests glued in them twice-three times, and the exams, have vanished from my present apartment much later, approximately in 2007-2009. But, if they were withdrawn by then finally and irrevocably, it can mean that someone knew about their existence back in 1999. Not casually I did not find them from 1999 to 2005, and consequently could not scan them in time. It is possible that they have been vanished, and then reappeared. When they suddenly "reappeared", I scanned them at once, but later the whole archive of these files on my hard disk and on DVDs, and patient's records themselves - "evaporated". I did not manage to "decode" these medical records, and to transfer them later to a digital format. Potentially, in unfriendly hands, medical information, which they contained, could pose a real danger for me.


For example, 2 summers in a row, in 1971-1972 (the 9th and 10th classes of school) I suffered bilateral pneumonia, and also intoxicative pyelonephritis. In both cases I survived, and stayed alive literally by miracle, and in both cases the illness burst just at once after the court hearings arranged by KGB directly at my school number 5 of the city of Bobruisk where I studied. Charges of anti-Soviet propaganda thrown by schoolmates; "testimonies" (false, of course) of schoolmates, or fake stories about my alleged "statements"; representatives of KGB gave speeches; my father was invited "for conversation" into UKGB building on Pushkinskaya Street. It is possible that the information on pyelonephritis and pneumonia have predetermined both the threats by a urological infection, and the diversion with the forged diagnosis "tuberculosis".


It was obvious that an extreme stressful situation brought down my immune system and that even if people from KGB "helped" me to fall sick (pneumonia and pyelonephritis [it was told in the reference from the hospital "intoxicative pyelonephritis", and - through 2 lines - "endointoxication": whether there is no hint in this contradiction?]) the organism could overcome this "help", but did not succeed because of the failure of immune system caused by a stress. If any malicious genius was going to simulate a similar situation, expecting to repeat what happened by then, these 2 directions - pulmonary and urological - should have promised to be the most resultative. Theoretically, by the same logic it was possible to expect that the news about "tubercular" fluorography will provoke a real pulmonary disease. In a different way, the purposes of false fluorography stretched much further than only to sabotage the immigration procedure.


The same mechanism could be expected to be effective via the threats to "punish" me by a urological infection. The most likely, it was the so-called opportunistic infection attacking "weak places" in my organism, when (in 1970 and 1971) my immune system was weakened by the campaign from KGB, and this has provoked the pyelonephritis.


This attack on my health could rely not only on suggestive and stress-modeling technique of influence, but also on the fluorography with an apparently elevated radiation; because after this mandatory Immigration"s fluorography - all of a sudden - there were changes in the blood count (deviations from norm). Even a small excess of radiation during a fluorography could lead to an irreversible damage of hematopoietic organs, and to a sharp decrease of the auto-immunity (i.e. a decrease of host organism"s fight against microorganisms living inside it whereas "external" bacteria could still receive an effective immune repulse). "Opportunistic" infections are the infections caused (under certain conditions) by microorganisms living in an absolutely healthy person as normal environmental flora, or when they get "not where they belong", provoking serious infectious diseases. For example, streptococci, enterococci, and other microorganisms of the same row, live in a gastroenteric tract, without causing any harm, but if they migrate into the urinogenital system: they cause a dangerous chronic infection. This happens more often in the conditions of immune failure. Besides, there are some individuals, who react to a stressful situation by actively eating (intuitively, for stress removal) unusual for them spicy and salty food, and, in these cases, the chance of a urological infection is several times higher. If an attempt to provoke a urological infection by means of suggestive, diversionary and provocative technique did not work, it can be repeated by employing an agent with a venereology disease to become a future sexual partner of the victim.


Besides, a number of urologic-venereal infections (including gonorrhea) can be contracted not from live contacts with people, but from contaminated objects, like towels, toilet paper, soap, condoms, underwear, etc.


The use of medicine, doctors, laboratories and medical institutions to destroy ideological or political opponents is more and more widely spreading in the modern world as it been practiced by Hitler and Stalin. In Canada, as well as everywhere, some politicians, the protégés of the global political reaction, put the opponents out of their way by the methods well perfected by Zionists.


[In Russian original, there is a list of sample cases, omitted here.]


Anything cannot be more eloquent than the fact that the beginning of criminal manipulations with my medical data, and the initial actions for the purpose of blasting my health, were carried out by the Federal Immigration: one of the Canadian enforcement agencies: same, as police, gendarmerie and intelligence services. Doctor Wanda Brzezinska, the doctor "accredited" in Immigration, also was a part of the Immigration department. Methodically and persistently, she was extorting from me the history of my health problems of the Soviet period, having promised and even having sworn that anything from my "before-Montreal" past will not be reported to the authorities. And, trusting her promises, I told her about an acute pyelonephritis in 1972 when I had a conflict with KGB (which may give someone ground for reflections and additional insinuations).


In 1972 the head of the nephrological unit, doctor Rayev, diagnosed "autoimmune intoxication" (poisoning), which complication became the pyelonephritis. For ethical reasons limiting this description to exclusively my personal history, I am compelled to hold back other events. So, I conceal about a "discovery" made by Dr. Tereza Brzezinska in 1998, and then in 2001, which also could give someone a subject for insinuations.


Doctor Brzezinska - a very qualified professional - could become a valuable source for enforcement agencies (like Immigration) and foreign intelligence services, if they were evaluating all main vulnerabilities of my psychology and physiology for any provocation, like an accident, or a blow to my health.


The rumors that madam Brzezinska was a relative of the former US Secretary of State Zbignew Brzezinski; her own pro-American (and, if so, probably, pro-Zionist) political orientation; the fact that her son - a political journalist (perhaps, a Russophobe) and a supporter of American "hawks" - went to Moscow and wrote a number of unfriendly to Russia articles for Canadian English newspapers: all this increases the chances of such a probability.


Immigration officials knew very well the history of persecutions, which ruined my life in the USSR, at least from my refugee file. I also drew a conclusion (from conversations with them) that they were well informed on the contents of my publications, and, in particular, about my publications on the Internet. My diary records (the memoirs), the special autobiography "Witness" (The Witness), my diary novels (and, in particular, the "Clockwork Doll") could give them a false impression that not only pyelonephritis could leave problems in me in this particular sphere, and now a smallest push can make them "active again". But, being non-fiction writers of dirty affairs far from literary craft, they did not consider that my hero and I - are not identical, and that even my novels based on my personal diaries, contain a Lion"s share of literary fiction. They might be described very truthfully, and, still, based not on my personal experience, but on fictional events, or on what used to happen with my close friends.


Since the beginning of the 20th century the cooperation between the repressive organs of the different countries (in persecution of dissidents) constantly gets stronger and wider. Only unaware people are thinking that the opponents, say, of the Soviet or another regime, the competitor of USA, having found refuge in the West, become "alive in safe" there. Actually, the honest, sincere dissidents (not mercantile careerists, not political speculators) instantly become objects of surveillance while their dossiers in the oppressive agencies soon migrate from the country of their former residence to local intelligence services in which archives disappear "object"s" personal file with all the information, including, for example, that years ago KGB or Stasi tried to infect the "object" by gonorrhea, streptococcus, staphylococci, or enterococci. So, the intelligence services learn that what is needed now is just to reanimate the disease.


From conversations with immigration officials (who - like police officers - interrogated me "with addiction") I received an impression that the whole folder of my file, perhaps, "moved" from former Soviet KGB to "a new residence" in the Canadian enforcement agencies (together, with, possibly, polyclinic and hospital medical records from USSR). After disintegration of USSR and KGB disbandment, by 1999-2000 almost all databases of KGB migrated to secret services" archives of USA and Israel. And, if some extremists in KGB, since the beginning of the 1980th been already supervised by the extremists in the intelligence elite of Israel, tried to use the same suggestive and stress-based methods against me, the extremists from pro-Zionist circles had just to resettle these KGB methods to the local soil.


CHAPTER 6.


Theoretically, a number of the uro-genital infections, including the gram-positive bacterium of Neisseria Gonorrhoeae, can be spread not through the sexual contacts. After all, unlike some others - sexually transmitted infections, - it is possible to infect someone with a gonococci bacterium "artificially", which means: not only "through a shared bed", but also via domestic way, by a contact with a contaminated thing. Let doctors assure us that the probability of such an infection is small: from 1 to 10 %, but, first, it exists, and, secondly, by some special strains the probability of the transmission through a household objects increased to 70 %.


But this is - in principle - not at all about any special "cunning" strains. Clinging to these 1-10 % of probability to be infected by the gonococci through the domestic appliances, doctors completely exclude even a slightest possibility of a deliberate infecting.


However, isn"t this infection "begins" from the mucous membranes? And, meanwhile, a dissemination of this bacterium to the mucous membrane of an eye - a simplest and effective way of "artificial" infection. Repeatedly I heard from experts about possibility of infection by the gonococci-infected creams, ointments, through some liquids for mouth rinsing, liquid soap, infected condoms (in a wet environment, this bacterium is capable perfectly survive), etc. (Damages - even smallest - of the mucous membranes: an additional gate for an infection). It is enough to keep the bacterial culture of gonococcus in the moist environment, and to transfer it to the moist environment of human body.


[The last edition's editorial remark: In 2022 and 2023, I survived a serious chemical poisoning, on 24 February 2022 and 23-24 February 2023; same date, 2 years in a row. 23 February - it was a Soviet Army Day in ex-USSR, and 24-2-2022: the new military conflict has burst in Europe. After that chilling experience, I am ready to believe that not just a suggestive technic could be used against me, but a direct "material" contamination.]


In my personal case, a new outbreak of an infection (most likely - an entherococci infection) 30 years after a pyelonephritis in 1972, or 15-20 years after a theoretical (unknown to me) diversion of Soviet or foreign intelligence services in USSR, or asymptomatic pyelonephritis complications during the same period - was impossible without an extraneous "help". And that is why.


Since my childhood having no addiction to spicy, bitter, or salty food, I, nevertheless, during any periods quite often "for the company" ate with friends pickles, marinaded tomatoes, horse-radish, radish, a house pizza with ketchup, and other similar delicacies. And, though I preferred vodka, cognac and red wine to all alcoholic beverages, sometimes 3-4 times a week, I, happened, periodically drank cold beer, jamming a vobla and a herring. (Certainly: before I became vegetarian). If there would be latent infectious cocci in my organism, it would be almost impossible to avoid manifestations of their activity during these 10 years after departure from the USSR.


On the other hand, in 1999 I already completely refused meat, having become the vegetarian, almost completely refused alcohol, and declared an absolute boycott to beer. I well remember that on the eve of New Year's holidays (2000-2001), and in the first days of new year did not eat any spicy or salty food. It means that no additional provocation of a urological infection could take place without an "assistance". As to the last, just the fact that my fluorography was forged and a false diagnosis "tuberculosis" was fabricated to topple the Immigration procedure in my case, speaks for itself. Even if it would be an "only" criminal "mistake" - it could justify any further suspicion. However, these moral freaks have continued to cling to the diagnosis "tuberculosis" even after an alternative X-Ray which completely excluded Immigration"s diagnosis as nonsense, rejecting both "civil" X-ray, and the conclusions of doctors (including the professor - lung specialist). It is just a smallest step from here - to a deliberate artificial infection of an objectionable person.

In addition, it is necessary to mention about a special culture of concealment of medical crimes. The doctor who do not comply with an unwritten law of cover up, refusing to hide a criminal mistake or a deliberate crime of his colleagues, will not be able to continue his medical practice.


A special danger (and every medical worker knows this) represents an attempt by the authorities to destroy the health of an "unwanted" person; therefore, the medics will try to keep themselves by all means away from such a case as far as possible. It explains astonishing negligence of doctors to whom I came in connection with a urological infection in January, 2001. Having been well informed about the history of my immigration "tuberculosis" saga and the forged receipt for a blood test that I never did, and also well informed about the threats voiced to me by Immigration officials "to infect with gonorrhea", my attending physicians could easily compare chronologically this history and arisen behind her immediately - at once - urological problem: and to draw "interesting" conclusions.


So, it is rather not surprising that on my demands to check me on a cocci infection (on all types of cocci, but, FIRST OF ALL - ENTHEROCOCCI) ALL doctors stubbornly responded, that "there is no need in it"! (Let"s compare it with the vicious search for any health abnormalities, when the enforcement department (Immigration) was after this!) They did not hesitate to spend neither time, nor forces, and the oratory art to assure me that I DO NOT HAVE such an infection and BY NO MEANS CAN have it. Meanwhile during the 1st year of this sudden acute urological problem (2001) I submitted to almost all doctors (to whom addressed) the following list of symptoms:


Initial symptoms: dysuria; micturition; urgency; frequency; interruption; inconsistency; painful bladder, back pain, burning; itching; dermatoses, etc.


Collateral symptoms and syndromes: 1) periodically - bones & joints pain; 2) "baggies" under both eyes; 3) left side low stomach pain; 4) teary eyes; 5) sensation of impossibility to empty the bladder completely; 6) mouth's small ulcers; 7) reoccurrences are provoked by spicy, salt, etc. food & beer. 8) HLA-B27-positive, soon followed by hematuria & other bloody discharges.


Only according to this list of symptoms it was already possible to guess a chronic urological infection, with high probability of enterococci. I submitted the list of these symptoms in 2001-2007 to doctors like Zigmund Jast, Ivan Rohan, Daniel Faran, Robert Piche, Pushi, Ury Krasny, Brian Morris, and others.


I kept copies of the vast majority of faxes which I sent to doctors both from the computer via the fax modem, and from the fax-machine. Thus, I have both listings of requisites of each fax, and originals of the texts with their own requisites and print outs to requisites of listings of sending. And the fact that not less than 2 dozens of medical doctors categorically refused to consider the above-stated symptoms in a complex as a manifestation of only ONE disease (and, instead, treated them as separate, not interconnected pathologies): must have a grave NON-MEDICAL context.


Certainly, even the set of the combination of these symptoms does not "guarantee" a cocci infection (supposed - enterococci) until the tests will prove it, but the persistent and systematic refusal of ALL doctors to issue the tests on such an infection cannot be anything else, but some kind of "political" taboo. It is possible to assume that at the 1st stage such a taboo could be partially caused by filtered information from the closed databases.


After the conflict in Montreal Chest Institute (MCI) (described above) and the closure of an access to phony Immigration"s fluorography for me, and for my doctors and lawyers (under which's pretext a false diagnosis "Tuberculosis" was forged) - I began guessing about a medical database created in late 1990-s in the state institutions, and inaccessible to "mere mortals", and used for the political terror.


A bit later came a supplementary information on the "closed" databases. Already by then secret services, police and "foreign partners" began to form them in Canadian medical institutions (1st of all, in the hospitals). Such a restricted zone with the classified dossiers can be one or several "sealed-up" computers; some protected by passwords and coded texts information on hard disks, or some folders in medical archives" computers and other computer databases; a safe; or a room, or part of the room separated by a lattice; a special compartment; or even the whole floor of a building. This is where the medical data on dissidents, thinkers, who ignore s.c. political correctness, or whistleblowers stored, and, on a pointer "from above", where the withdrawn results of the tests, ultrasounds, X-rays, etc. are flowing into.


Before I left the hospital, I realized that the "keeper" of the false fluorography, probably, bluffed: the envelope shown by him could be empty. Neither a film, nor an X-Ray"s conclusive report was inside. Only the "birdie" mark on one of the paragraphs on the envelope: "category "4". As though someone's hand made an incorrect movement - and put this sign in a wrong place... A bit later I found out that the "category 4" means "pulmonary noodles", which is absolutely absurd in my case!


However, there is a possibility of even more sinister explanation. "Category "4" in virusology is a symbol of the deadliest viruses, more dangerous than tuberculosis. Ebola, HIV, and some other viruses fit into this category. What if a fake "tuberculosis" was just a pretext to put me into infectious disease unit not only for torpedoing our immigration procedure, but also because of something else?


As I already mentioned above, I linked the insults and threats of that MCI doctor-"keeper" - with the aggressive extortion of donations (racketing) by Royal Victoria hospital. I was getting at these time dozens of envelopes with the requests to transfer large sums of money to the hospital; so numerous that sometimes they all did not fit in the mail box, and this created a problem.


Packs of identical extortion letters used to arrive daily in 1999-2001.


We are not greedy people, and willingly would transfer a sum available to us into hospital"s account, but the sums demanded were astronomical, and everything that we had, we gave out for immigration lawyers and procedures, and, sometimes it happened that we had to borrow money to pay the rent. Especially outrageous was the fact that - a next extortion demand arrived enclosed in the same envelope: together with the "tubercular" letter on behalf of Immigration, sent to me from MCI (see above).


Later, in accordance with the circumstances and the events in the MCI, I began to visit (in case of emergency) generally the ER at St.-Mary"s hospital. I also did the majority of the tests there, and visited offices of medical specialists. It is a very good hospital, one of 3-4 best hospitals in Montreal. But only recently I casually learned about the rumors that there is a club of rich sponsors behind this hospital: an informal organization of Christian and Jewish (St.-Mary"s hospital is situated just near the giant Montreal Jewish hospital) Zionists, sectarians and members of a Satanic cult. This club of political and ideological reactionaries and social racists goes beyond the sponsors and managers of this hospital, extending its influence on the most influential medical doctors - the "pillars" of the local staff (such, as doctor Morris, doctor Sejean, and others). Political engagement of physicians and St.-Mary"s hospital personnel defines the "selective" treatment of patients, depending on their socioeconomic status and their views.


The form for donations for RV hospital"s enclosed in the same envelope with the false "tuberculosis accusation" (on behalf of Immigration), with an order to come for hospitalization in the infectious diseases unit, and to pay for such a "treatment" a considerable sum of money: it is something so disgusting that there are simply no epithets and definitions in human language for it. This is an all-important fact in the light of ridiculous financial claims, which I heard from the MCI doctor, and - later - during every appointment with Dr. Morris.


I must also remind again about the financial background of the refugee status denial, when a next maxim emerged: that, allegedly, if the Middle Eastern state took us (against our will!) to its territory from Warsaw at own expense, we belong to this state forever. I must stress here that I never left any debts behind. Doctor Morris refused me vital tests, emphasizing that will issue the requisites only if I "go private" (i.e. if I will pass them at own expense). This most obvious connection between the enforcement officers and such doctors as Dr. Morris uncover the political and ideological background of mistreatment by some physicians and medical institutions, within the coordinated pressure-intimidation campaign of police and medical institutions.


CHAPTE R 7.


The frontal attack on me was coordinated chronologically with a frontal attack on my mother, who was receiving similar lampoons from November 23, 1999 to December, 2001 (during 2 years). When our case received an international publicity, and especially after Quebec (in peak to the Federal Immigration - flooded with pro-Israeli agents of influence) gave us the Certificat de Sélection du Québec, which has withdrawn us from under the jurisdiction of Federal Immigration. Having no more levers for putting pressure upon me, the Federal Immigration officials have decided to recoup on my mother.


On November 23, 1999 a subversive and terrorist campaign against my mother was initiated, which purpose - through attacking her - was to continue plundering me, and - in passing - catastrophically undermine her health.


Here are some examples (we must pay attention that some of these documents contradict each other):


The Original of the above-stated letter (French):


Citizenship and Immigration Canada

Citoyenneté et immigration Canada

0000 00000 ID: 0000-0000


Date: 23/11/1999

M-me Elisabeta Gunin


A Remettre Au médecin désigné, Dr. Wanda Brzezinska


REF: Elisabeta Gunin

Dossier CIC: 0000-0000

Dossier Ottawa: 0000 00000


Veuillez trouver ci-joint des renseignements médicaux complémentaires soumis par le requérant, en-bas mentionne. Puisque vous avez déjà fait subir l'examen médical e ca requérant, le 12 novembre 1994, nous vous prions d'étudier ce renseignements et de les faire parvenir, avec les commentaires s il y a lieu, a:


Réseau des services de Ministre

Services de sante de Immigration

Tour Jean Edmonds

365 Quest, rue Laurier, 1er étage

Ottawa, Ontario

K1A 1L1


Veuillez prendre note, que le requérant est responsable pour toutes frais a ce processus.


Héiène Roy, Conseiller en Immigration.


____________

COMMENT: During the years of Mulroney and Chrétien governments Canada accepted a number of resolutions, and entered a number of new rules, laws and amendments to the laws contradicting if not to a letter, but to the spirit of International law, the Charter of Human rights, United Nations" resolutions, and the rights and the dignity of people.


For example, the law on the citizenship revocation is identical to the practice of the former USSR: the totalitarian state, which was trampling on international norms and humanitarian requirements.


Even the system of "civil" immigration doctors, whose patients are the applicants for the status of refugees and other categories of potential immigrants, already breaks fundamental medical ethical principles, as the doctors with the death grip of Immigration on their throats - are the persons of interest who are carrying out the will of even more biassed officials of Immigration and heads of this enforcement department (a classical model of the use of medical services for political goals).


But even this does not come within miles with Immigration Medical Services (IMS) within the Ministry of Immigration: in practice an enforcement agency of the state "prison" (in fact) doctors who are carrying out any order of the administrative of their political chiefs - immigration officials. They de facto are given authorization to fabricate any fake, false diagnosis, any forged medical certificate with an absolute impunity, and potentially the green light (and possibility!) is given to them to undermine health of the "unwanted", and even (potentially) to kill people.


But the immigration practice of the Federal Canadian Immigration department went further away, extending (directly or indirectly) these draconian medical "arm-twisting" methods to refugees, to the applicants of the humanitarian program, to spouses of Canadian citizens, etc. - thereby openly trampling on the fundamental humanitarian and ethical standards of the civilized world.


I mention all this not for an effect, not for the sake of the criticism of the Canadian immigration practice, but for an only purpose to emphasize, that, EVEN REGARDING THESE METHODS, what they did to my mother - was an EXCLUSIVE CRUELTY and hardly having more than 1-2 analogs in 1990-s - 2000-s....

_________


The background of the above-stated letter was such:


At some moment (I cannot recall an exact date, but, I think, near the end of 1998 or in 1999) me and my mother: we felt an inexplicable change in our Immigration doctor"s (Wanda Brzezinski) attitude and treatment, with whom we were previously connected not only by a mutual sympathy, but also by a true friendship.


In our "former" (pre-Canadian) life me, my mother, and madam Brzezinska belonged to the same social class; we had similar education, similar tastes... Madam Brzezinska offered us valuable books in Polish, and also the articles of her son. My mother, a former police investigator, well understood a danger of gifts to Dr. Brzezinska in reply to her gifts (certainly, not as a bribe, but in all sincerity, which all the same could be interpreted "differently") and consequently rendered to madam Brzezinska the attention signs only (so to speak).


Doctor Brzezinska was a high-class professional, and, in many respects thanks to her, neither mother's, nor my health worsen during this period, despite all Immigration"s mistreatment. On the contrary, my mother felt much better, than before (before the arrival to Canada). Besides, doctor Brzezinska made a lot of good deeds for us in general. However, recently I discovered (looking over my mothers" medical documents and tests) that Dr. Brzezinska did many bad things BEFORE her betrayal in 1999: for example, did not inform my mother about a urine infection, and did not prescribed antibiotics as minimum 2 times.


Therefore, an unmotivated change in her relation to us guarded us and puzzled.


My mother, a former inspector (investigator) of prosecutor's office, a former secretary of the regional court, and the Acting deputy prosecutor of the region - was a good judge in legal matters, and, at her insistence, we transferred our files to another Immigration doctor, Dr. Giannakis, an orthodox Greek.


(If my memory does not mislead me - first I left Dr. Brzezinska, and my mother left her later; I began to feel the changes in Dr. Brzezinska"s treatment before my mother).


From the moment when my mother also felt (independently) the changes concerning the treatment of Dr. Brzezinska there passed no more than 2 weeks.


One of the evident examples of Dr. Brzezinska"s shift from a friendly doctor to an enemy was how she reacted to my problems with the frequent sprains. In the beginning of 1970-s, I was attacked in Mogilev (where I was a student at local music college) by 3 strangers (one of them was future dictator of Belarus, Alexander Lukashenko, who was a student at Mogilev Pedagogical Institute; years after I met Lukashenko several times in Kirovsk and in Myshkovichi; I never admitted that I recognized him). In result of this skirmish, I got a tendon"s injury, with the heel"s ligaments serious trauma.


Since then, I am having frequent ligaments" strains, and, for this problem, Dr. Brzezinska used to prescribe anti-inflammatory medications and applications, and gave me a list of recommendations and exercises" brochures, which helped to restore my functionality very quickly. However, when her attitude has changed, she sabotaged any medical help, resorting to brutal and cynical remarks. In this period, I once came to her with a very severe ligaments" injury. I was suffering from strong pains, which was so tormenting that I could not sleep; I could not walk for 2 months; every step became a torture. And Dr. Brzezinska, who used to prescribe anti-inflammatory and knew how to heal such an injury, said: nobody will do the ligaments surgery for me, as this is a very expensive procedure. And kicked me out.


As to the dates of our transition to doctor Giannakis, there is a serious chronological divergence in my own records, plus - a divergence with the records of my mother. This confusion with our records can speak about my absent-mindedness and forgetfulness (because of the permanent stressful situation), but, in any case, some of the very important and verbose details of the overall picture are lost. However, after recovering some documents that were stolen from my home, but which I could find at another storage, I can make a conclusion that it happened not later then September-October, 1999. It means that in November, 1999, we already became Dr. Giannakis" patients.


Since August-September, 1999, shortly before these changes, Immigration officials have started to bomb us (me and mother) by the orders to provide the "references about her health". It could to be an order to send copies of all tests and other medical exams [since November, 1994 (i.e. since our arrival to Montreal)] or to make a cardiogram, and to send the result to Immigration, etc.


Generally, there were orders given by phone, and when Immigration"s agents called, they did not name themselves and spoke anonymously. Such a persecution was signaling about the prejudice, about the violation of not only the formalities, but also the legality, and it should be put to an end.


An impartial treatment assumed an arrival of the special written notice from Immigration about the requirement of passing the medical committee, together with the formularies enclosed in the same envelope. But, since the officials have sabotaged the medical exam (commission) in accordance with the general practice, we decided to take the initiative in our own hands - at least in the case of my mother. After receiving the Quebec"s Selection Certificate, we could do it with the help of Dr. Brzezinska, but she refused to cooperate. In November, 1999, through one of our lawyers, we obtained the formularies on passing the medical commission, filled these questionnaires, addressed to one of the doctors - from the list of practitioners accredited in Immigration (Dr. Andreas Giannakis), - and my mother has passed the required Immigration medical exam (if my memory does not fail me: in November, 1999).


After almost 20 years - I do not remember the details of how exactly it was organized and made.


The results of the medical exams were satisfactory; they did not create any problem for obtaining the status of the permanent resident of Canada, and the officials of Immigration was not certain now, at what to carp.


Another question - what they could or wanted to do with these medical documents or what were planning to do. Apparently, at their first attempt, it did not turn out to ignore, destroy, or to alter these documents, and, thus, it was necessary to challenge the results of the major medical examination attached to my mother's file. But even this last did not lie near a plan of the elementary legality: after all, there were no bases and justifications for such a step.


The forms with the results of the medical commission under Dr. Giannakis" supervision were sent to Immigration in the end of November, 1999. The X-Ray found no abnormalities except of a related to heart non-significant vascular calcification, and an asymmetrical thyroid enlargement. I saw all the medical formularies" paged, and even copied them, and remembered that there was no stamp of La Cite radiology on the page with the point 5 (Certification by the Radiologist), only a medical license number.


However, between 29 Nov. and 3 Dec. 1999 three (3) letters arrived from Immigration, and by 1 of these letters Immigration returned all papers with the filled forms "for a "reassessment". The most outraged was a demand to redo the chest X-Ray. My mother already did the X-Ray on November 24 or 26, 1999 at La Cite, and 2 X-Rays, one right after another one, could endanger her health by excessive radiation, especially for a person from Chernobyl"s affected areas. I remembered (according to my notes) that the 1-st X-Ray test (November 24 or 26, 1999) was signed by a radiologist with a French family name. However, the second X-Ray at La Cite was signed by Dr. Francis M. Boston. I found among the recovered notes and documents my own note (written by myself in 2000), which says "doctor M. Boston... Worked for the Jewish General, and for the Royal Victoria Hospitals? Never worked at La cite?".


The date of the 2-nd X-Ray test (which my mother was forced to do) was scheduled by Immigration for 6 December 2000, the same day when a letter from Immigration with a forged diagnosis "tuberculosis" was delivered to me by a courier 1 year later. This malicious coordination and conspiracy give out the criminal intentions of those who stand behind the campaign of medical terrorism.


I assume that the crooks from the medical department of Immigration probably replaced 1-2 (or 3?) pages [point 5; section E] of the immigration medical examination formularies for landed papers performed in November by Dr. Giannakis (whom they obliged in December to sign these replaced pages), or, maybe, removed the previous radiologist"s signature by some criminal forgery methods, and entered Dr. Boston"s signature instead (paragraph 5, section B (?), and added a note into section E (paragraph 3).


I saw all the medical formularies" in November 1999, and even copied them, and remembered that there was no stamp of La Cite radiology on the page with the point 5 (Certification by the Radiologist), only a signature of another radiologist, and his medical license number. However, after December, 6, 1999, a stamp of La Cite appeared, and no mention of the previous (November) X-Ray. Moreover, there is no Dr. Boston"s medical license number, which could be OK for an ordinary X-Ray (or even a gray zone), but definitely not OK for an X-Ray, ordered by Immigration.


On the 1-st of December (Wednesday), and on the 3-rd of December, 1999 (Friday): there were 2 calls from Immigration to my mother. On December, 1, her husband spoke to Immigration officer, and was shaken by this conversation, which made on two old people an exceptionally stressful impact. On December, 3, I spoke with the Immigration officer, who told me to call my mother to the phone. I explained that my mother has a deafness problem, and also does not has a good understanding in English or French, but the immigration Lady insisted. When my mother took over the phone, the Immigration official has started to speak very aggressively, and soon she was screaming on my mother, and insulting her. And on December 4, 2000 (Saturday, but the letter was delivered by courier!) Immigration official Mr. Chiu demanded certificates from medical specialists about my mother"s health situation at the present moment. (In contradiction to the ongoing medical evaluation that was ACTUALLY taking place). It is not excluded that all these actions were arranger for the deliberate harm for my mother"s heart just before the repeated X-Ray.


I believe that Immigration"s medical authorities have developed 2 alternative scenarios: 1) to leave Dr. Giannakis" (who did not want to cooperate with the criminals) medical conclusions intact, but to replace the 1-st X-Ray (done in November) result by a new one; and 2) to counterfeit a backdating forgery, which could give an impression that, allegedly, old (from 1994) medical findings are backing up this new X-Ray. Such an investigative hypothesis is supported by the fact that in both cases (in mine case of Immigration"s falsified "tubercular" diagnosis, and in my mother"s case of December the 6-th (1999) "repeated" X-Ray) they used the same radiology technique, and based the sabotage of the normal legal immigration procedure exclusively on these 2 (mine and my mother"s) X-Rays [besides, linked to the same date of 6 December of 1999 and 2000]. I would not be surprised if the forged "tubercular" X-Ray from November, 2000, was signed by the same Dr. M. Boston, who signed my mother"s X-Ray on December, 6, 1999.


The forgery 2) was needed also to cover up the damage to my mother"s health in result of inhuman, illegal, and deliberately devastative to her health Immigration"s methods. In mine and in my mother"s complains we wrote that "6 years in a limbo, in administrative mayhem and ultra-vulnerable state, continued damaging our mental and physical health", "such an outraged criminal misconduct was demonstrated in my case that Immigration is eventually ready to do any damage to my health through blood, e-ray tests or sadistic bureaucratic humiliations", "(...) Immigration officers" (Madam Roy, Mr. Chiu, and others) actions. During a long period of time (more then one year and a half!) they were committing actions, which sole purpose was a) to damage my health, b) destroy my financial situation"; so, all persons, guilty of ruining my mother"s health, wanted to present the catastrophic for her changes in her health situation in result of Immigration"s humiliations as "the old issues". Certainly, if my mother would have these illnesses in the past, it would challenge all charges against them.


All above presented conclusions support the idea that the forgery number 2) was strictly depending on the forgery number 1) [the X-Ray, signed by Dr. Boston]. For producing a backdating fake document or documents, they needed first the X-Ray report from December, 6, 1999.


Here are the official results of these particular exams:


An extremely important detail is that during 5 years my mother was taking ONLY Atenolol (controlling the blood pressure), and nothing else. If she had such serious heart conditions as was pretended in the forged paper (allegedly, from 1994), signed by Dr. Brzezinska, she would have no chances to survive. If she had such serious heart conditions as was pretended in the forged paper, allegedly, from 1994, signed by Dr. Brzezinska, then why Dr. Brzezinska did not prescribe any appropriate medications for heart problems management?


As we can see, there is nothing that may NOT comply with the medical requirements for accomplishing the landed documents paperwork, according to Dr. Giannakis; the same conclusion the doctor made in November, before the repeated X-Ray.


Because the previous X-Ray (November, 1999) did not find anything besides a related to heart non-significant vascular calcification, and an asymmetrical thyroid enlargement, there are could be only 3 suggestions:


1) The X-Ray on 6 Dec. 1999 was a complete forgery, and did not correspond to the real situation, and, consequently, my mother did not had these abnormalities.

2) The X-Ray on 6 Dec. 1999 has reflected the dramatic damage to my mother"s health, inflicted by the letter from Immigration"s officer Mr. Chiu on December 4, 1999; by 2 calls from Immigration on 1-st of December (Wednesday), and on the 3-rd of December, 1999 (Friday); and by an order to redo the X-Ray (which have been already done in November, 1999).

3) The X-Ray on 6 Dec. 1999 has noticed the dramatic damage to my mother"s health, inflicted by Immigration, but also extremely exaggerated her newly acquired heart"s abnormalities, in order to blow up her immigration procedure.


I opt to the 4-th possibility: that some damage to my mother"s cardiovascular system was already deliberately inflicted by Immigration officials through their purposeful cruelty, but the dramatic changes have not been occurred. Consequently, the X-Ray done on 6 Dec. 1999 was mostly falsified by its medical report, because my mother did not have even the nearest cardiovascular problems yet. I personally took her to La Cite for this repeated X-Ray, and what happened there was that they misinformed her, when she had to breath, and when to stop the respiration. I protested, and demanded to declare this X-Ray void, and to repeat it in 6 months. Then, as my mother presented it in 1 of her letters to Immigration: "Only when I went to redo the chest x-ray [demanded by Immigration] a sort of misunderstanding accrued: because I could not understand the command - WHEN I had to breathe. My son demanded to repeat the x-ray. Then we were surrounded by personnel's hostile behavior - and my son was told that Immigration already contacted them in impatience".


It is clear that something very weird occurred there during this X-Ray, and it could not be trusted...

I don't know if my mother ever had even a smallest cardiomegaly, but in 2004 tomography-scintigraphy revealed no catastrophic problems with her heart, if not consider a light decrease in blood supply for the heart muscle as a VERY serious problem, which requires an urgent surgery.


If my mother had such a grave condition in 2000, she could not live without a heart surgery, and she could not have a relatively safe state of health 4 years after. Besides, in 2004 she suffered from another drama (initiated by 2 ministries: Ministry of Immigration and Ministry of Revenue), which completely devastated her and her health. And, definitely, she could not have such a serious condition back in 1994, because she would not survive next 10 years and after (especially: without any visits to cardiologists and medications), which possible ONLY in science-fiction movies!


Her worst health situation period has started only in 2005, after the above mentioned bureaucratic drama in 2004, and was aggravated by an accident (a hip neck fracture) and humiliations that she faced in the hospital (see in next chapters).


Mine and my mother's immigration dossier was demanded by our immigration consultants and lawyers M-me Nina Piaskowska (Immigration consultant), Maître Alexei Drozdowski, Maître Miroslaw Jankowski, Maître Frances Hudon Szigeti, and Maître Johanne Doyon: all decent people, high-top jurists, and very smart individuals. I may be wrong in my calculations about the actual dates, but, probably, from July 1998 - to August 2001, Immigration sabotaged my mother's and my requests, blocking us granted by the law access to our files. Only in August, 2001 (I think so), we received my mother's file on Maître Jankowski"s request, but more than half of the documents' volume was missing. Then Maître Doyon has managed to receive my mother"s file in more complete shape (perhaps, in December, 2001), but the most important documents were missing again. And only in February or March, 2002, Maître Doyon could obtain a more complete copy, but many of the documents were still missing.


Having serious health problems (by then), and other turmoil, I did not study these documents carefully, but just copied them. Then, not sooner that in the beginning of 2002, I scanned those copies, and saved the scanned material to a compact-disk. Then I made 3 copies of the disk. However, in the end of 2002, all papers and 2 disks of 3 have disappeared from my home. Only in 2019, a friend of mine found the 3-rd disk in his home, and gave it back to me. (I gave some of the backups to my friends). This is how I discovered additional documents (besides the papers sent from Immigration, or obtained from doctors and lawyers).


Among them, I found an X-Ray report, which contradict the report signed by Dr. M. Boston on 6 Dec. 1999:


It means that on 21 November 1994 my mother had no heart problems and no abnormalities. The radiologist, Dr. S. Armanios, was a recognized authority in his domain, and I heard very high opinions about him.


This is how Canadian doctors can easily "make" anyone formally sick or formally healthy, depending of government's orders and interests. When it was in government's interests, they made us (me and my mother) "sick", inventing forged tuberculosis and other diseases; but when the government had an interest in sabotaging medical help, all my real health problems were cruelly negated.


As it was described above, we moved from Dr. Brzezinska to doctor Giannakis somewhere in September-October, 1999, thus, the above-stated letter from 23 November 1999 was sent to my mother when she already was a patient of Dr. Giannakis, and, nevertheless, the Immigration has directed this message - through my mother - to Dr. Brzezinska (her FORMER doctor). This alone constitutes a deliberate malicious violation of the law. But, on a bigger scale, this letter was illegal also because it demanded a special medical exam OUT OF the PROCEDURE of the Immigration medical evaluation defined by the law and provided by Dr. Giannakis. (Or, in other words, it was not in accordance with the general practice). Besides, my mother"s medical file was supervised from Ottawa, which is also not a general practice.


I quote this notoriously remarkable letter again:


========

Citizenship and Immigration Canada

Citoyenneté et immigration Canada

0000 00000 ID: 0000-0000


Date: 23/11/1999

M-me Elisabeta Gunin


A Remettre Au médecin désigné, Dr. Wanda Brzezinska


REF: Elisabeta Gunin

Dossier CIC: 0000-0000

Dossier Ottawa: 0000 00000


Veuillez trouver ci-joint des renseignements médicaux complémentaires soumis par le requérant, en-bas mentionne. Puisque vous avez déjà fait subir l'examen médical e ca requérant, le 12 novembre 1994, nous vous prions d'étudier ce renseignements et de les faire parvenir, avec les commentaires s il y a lieu, a:


Réseau des services de Ministre

Services de sante de Immigration

Tour Jean Edmonds

365 Quest, rue Laurier, 1er étage

Ottawa, Ontario

K1A 1L1


Veuillez prendre note, que le requérant est responsable pour toutes frais a ce processus.


Héiène Roy, Conseiller en Immigration.

======


There is an order established by the law: a special form, formularies, the rules of passing the medical exams through an Immigration-assigned doctor. The state of health of the applicant for the permanent residence permit must be defined in Canada strictly within such a procedure. So, an impartial, lawful and corresponding to medical ethical standards medical examination is possible only under the condition of passing it IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE GENERAL PRACTICE.


However, the letter from December 23, 1999, signed by the immigration official Helen Roy - was a malicious violation of the principle "in accordance with the general practice". It was nothing else but an intervention by an immigration official - not a doctor (who has neither medical education, nor certification, neither medical license, nor membership in medical association) - in the strictly medical domain, for the purpose of criminal pressure upon doctors for obtaining a biased, subjective medical rapport. Moreover, as far as I know, my mother did not provide ANY "additional" medical materials to Immigration at that time. It means, that this official (M-me Roy) used such a "coded", Aesop word as a substitute for mentioning a medical exam of my mother by the Dr. Wanda Brzezinska, or by the Dr. Giannakis, or the result of the lawful medical commission passed in accordance with the general practice.


In turn, the rapport of the official medical commission which my mother passed on November 15-20, 1999 (signed and certified by Dr. Giannakis), was the lawful document issued on the general and lawful bases, legitimate methods and in full accordance with the procedural and regulative form. My mother already made by then both the cardiogram, and the stress cardiogram (under physical activity), a so-called stress test. Both of them did not show any dangerous tendencies. But this medical certificate did not fit into the interests of certain people in this department with the conflict of interests, or, more precisely - their proteges in Immigration, - who aspired a revenge on us for the truth about an "untouchable" and "subject to impunity" Middle Eastern state, for the truth which was in our refugee file.


It is obvious, it was not so simple to challenge a lawful medical certificate, first, because the lawful and justifiable bases were necessary for that. For what reason would unlawful Immigration officials have began to scramble a legal document, and to reconsider the immigration procedure already passed by someone else? Only if someone in the Immigration department had a grudge against a particular applicant. And they had to hide and cover up this. Therefore, they needed exclusively illegal methods.


Before continuing our revision, we must emphasize that EVEN if my mother would have such a serious health problem, which would demand an excessive public expenses for medical procedures, her file would still COMPLY with the humanitarian reasons (the immigration program, which allowed her to receive the Certificat de Sélection du Québec), according to 3 of our lawyers. It was especially actual because my mother had no travel documents (to leave Canada), no passport of any country, and she had no place (no country) where to go. All her relatives (I, her son, my wife, and mother's granddaughters) lived in Montreal, and no mother"s close relatives remain at any other country. In this situation the impediment of all immigration procedures and the sabotage of the paperwork on her landed immigrant papers - were absolutely senseless, and comprised a constitution of exclusively humiliating and sadist character.


She married a Canadian citizen, and all humiliations and repressions that my mother was facing automatically affected him, too. However, Immigration officials had no mercy for two old people.


Thus, this letter from Immigration is telling about a task "ordered" by an Immigration official to Dr. Wanda Brzezinska which obliges the last to reconsider results of the lawful medical exams, including the medical exam which was carried out by Dr. Brzezinska herself on November 12, 1994. This illegal operation was carried out in the style of the intelligence services and their methods. Moreover, the additional "requirements" were "coded" and classified, since were sent to Dr. Brzezinska in a separate sealed-up envelope that neither my mother, nor her lawyer had no right to open and to see what a "duck" is inside. Abundantly clearly that it was a plot, or, speaking more simply, a plot of an immigration official with the doctor, at the level of an illegal, criminal conspiracy.


No justification for any additional exams was given, and, thus, there was no lawful basis for them. Immigration officials did not secure their medical demands with a consent of my mother to do these "additional" medical procedures, did not justify them to her, and did not prove their legality. Mentioning that doctor Wanda Brzezinska already examined my mother on November 12, 1994 (soon after arrival to Canada) and demanding to "reconsider" the conclusions about my mother's health, the immigration official hints the doctor that the result the November, 1994 exams does not suit her, and may be cognized biased in favor of the patient, i.e. the Immigration official was sending veiled threats to the doctor, forcing her to agree for the "revision". The threats sounded very serious (one could guess about the confiscation of the medical license, or even worse). They were so transparent that even a child could understand the hint.


After a while we learned from one of our immigration lawyers that doctor Wanda Brzezinska made an unfavorable report (about my mother's health) for Immigration which stopped the procedure of the permanent residence status, and, respectively, the Canadian citizenship for my mother, in spite that she was by then a wife of a Canadian citizen (since December 19, 1998) and - besides - lived in Canada 7 years as an apatrid (a person without any citizenship). Thereby the international laws and agreements about the apatrids (people without a citizenship) and about the terms according to which it is possible to keep such people currently "in a hover" without the residence permit: were roughly trampled. The standards of the treatment of the spouses of Canadian citizens were trampled, too.


Whether this official report with the signature of Dr. Brzezinska was necessary for Immigration for the purpose to replace the lawful document from November 12, 1994 by a false one, - or was initiated as new forged material: in either case it was illegal, or, more exact - a criminal act.


Here (below) is the truthful (real) document of Dr. Brzezinska"s medical attestation of my mom on 12-18 November, 1994, with not even a single indication of any serious health problems:


(see the next 2 pages [documents' images] :)


(see the next page (image) : )


---------------


CHAPTER 8.


So, in 1994, my mother was generally a healthy (for her age) person, having just a common for people in her age hypertension and glaucoma (both caused by 2 serious head traumas), and impair hearing (for the same reason).


And the documents, presented below, are probably a fake, forged in December 1999 (or January 2000), and dated back (backdated) to 5 February 1995 (the comparison of 1 copies support this conclusion due to the reasons explained below):


The left copy was obtained when we managed to get a set of my mother's documents from Immigration on request of Maître M. Jankowski (August, 2001?), and by then this particular document had no stamp "entered in FOSS Feb 10 1995".


On the right, we can see a copy, obtained among other documents on request of Maître J. Doyon in February or March 2002, and now a stamp "entered in FOSS Feb 10 1995" appeared on the same paper. Besides, letters JP (R) were added (printed) above "M.S. serial number", and, in addition, another signature appeared on the left side of the stamp. If this document was produced back in 1995 indeed, it supposed to have all these marks and the stamp back in 1995. However, all these modifications were added between August 2001 and March 2002 (if my memory is precise; but not earlier then November 2001, when we became clients of M-me Doyon, a generous person, brilliant layer, and brave women). This alone constitute an undeniable proof that this document is a fake.


2 almost identical names of 2 different doctors provoke a reasonable suspicion: for example, a suggestion that both names are a fake, or that one of these names was derived from the other one, i.e. was forged. It was possible if the swindlers could obtain a consent of only 1 doctor, but needed 2 signatures. In this case, the other alleged doctor is a figurehead.


As in the further documents we can find the name of doctor Bertrand, and his signature, but not the name of another doctor, the name "J. Beltran" could be just derived from his name. If this is a too courageous supposition, and does not reflect the reality of the possibilities: it is because Immigration officials have committed (in our case) so many notorious crimes, that gave an impression that just everything is possible within that ministry.


Let"s quote the most important text of this document:


"In the opinion of the undersigned medical officers, the applicant is suffering from a disease, disorder, disability or other health impairment as a result of the nature, severity, or probable duration of which:


She is or is likely to be a danger to public health or to public safety.


Her admission would cause or might reasonably be expected to cause excessive demands on health or social services.


HEMATURIA - HYPERTENSION - CARDIOMEGALY


The 69-year-old refugee claimant was noted on examination to have cardiovascular and renal abnormalities.


The findings are such that a serious disorder which may be expected to cause excessive demand cannot be excluded at this time as the applicant has only been assessed under the medical provisions of Section 19 (1) (a) (i) of the Act (public health and safety).


Due to the presence of these abnormalities, the applicant should be informed to seek medical follow-ups. A new medical is required if the Immigration status changes."


The conclusions after reading this document are: that


1) its summary ("she is (...) a danger to public health or public safety") irreconcilable to the stage of the refugee claim [so, her medical documents could be sent to Ottawa"s revision NOT SOONER then 1999];


2) the diagnosis "renal abnormalities" based on 2-3 urine tests, which manifested a simple UTI that should be treated with antibiotics: was a fake, and constituted a medical crime;

3) hypertension is a common issue in people over 60 y.o., and should not be listed as the pretext of so called "medical inadmissibility";


4) my mother was never informed about any heart problems, as well as about hematuria in her blood tests, was never referred to a urologist and cardiologist before 1999, when Immigration began to use medical tools to sabotage her immigration procedures.


If the documents, which claim that back in 1995 my mother was suffering from a serious heart disease, were authentic originals, then why she received no information about her health problems, and was not given follow-ups? Why she was not referred to a cardiologist? If the documents, which claim that back in 1995 my mother has suffered from a serious heart disease, were authentic originals, then Dr. Wanda Brzezinska, and other doctors, involved into this scam, have committed serious misconduct, equal to war crimes.


However, a greater possibility is that my mother was not suffering from a heart disease in 1994-1998, and all these papers are a forgery. If my memory does not fail me, the office of Immigration Medical Services was founded not before 1998, and, if so, Ottawa"s IMS involvement into my mother"s case was impossible in 1995.


If this document, and all other related to it documents were not a forgery, then how comes that there is no indication about the sources of information on "HEMATURIA - HYPERTENSION - CARDIOMEGALY"? Doctors Bertrand and Beltran (if they ever existed!) have never saw my mother, and never assessed her. So, how did they know about "hematuria - hypertension - cardiomegaly"? While we can suppose that they could know about the hematuria (which is not a serious condition in no way in women, and due to just 2-3 urine analysis, and, besides, with a normal creatinin level) from the laboratory tests, and about the hypertension - from Dr. Brzezinska"s report, there were no assessments, exams, or tests, which detected "cardiomegaly" before 1999. One of 2 chest X-Rays, done at Reddy Memorial Hospital (end of November, 1994), was already presented above, and it says "No recent pulmonary infiltrate seen. The cardiopericardial silhouette within normal limits". No cardiomegaly was detected by then. In 1997 another X-Ray was done on request of Immigration in the same hospital, which did not detect any abnormalities.


Among the documents of my mother immigration case, submitted from Immigration on request of Maitre Doyon (2001), we found no medical document dated 1994-1998 with the "cardiomegaly" diagnosis or reference, in exception of papers, produced by Immigration itself. NO document, which could support the Medical Notification (signed by doctors Bertrand and Beltran, and, allegedly going back to 1995), was found in my mother"s file; no medical document, signed by Dr. Bzhezinska and mentioned heart problems in 1994-1995, ever existed.


It is very unlikely that such medical documents could be missing, because Immigration was interested in the cover-up, and should block an access to all documents, which confirmed Immigration officials" wrongdoing, but not to the documents, which could justifier them. If any medical documents, which mentioned cardiomegaly before 1999, were in the pack of the copies, which we received on Maitre Jankowski"s request, they had to be disconnected from the content because we did not receive the most important documents from Immigration by then, and, thus, could evade my attention. Thus, from the formal legal point, based on the documents, submitted by Immigration on request of Maitre Doyon in 2001, there was not only legal, but no any basis for any conclusion about the cardiomegaly.


Another proof that this document is a fake (forged in December, 1999, or January, 2000) is the next paper [it can be seen below], which was printed on 17 January 2000 as an info on client"s medical status, but which purpose was to justify the denial of the landed immigrant status under the false "medical reasons" [in terms to defend a claim that, allegedly, the megalocardia and other heart and alleged kidney problems were observed back in 1994, at the moment of my mother"s entry to Canada, which was not true], while the paper itself had no documental ID, no Immigration officers" names, no signatures, no purpose:


However, this paper (produced on 17 Jan, 2000) is very significant and important for our investigation, because of the next statement:


DATE APPR/DENIED 06FEB1995 DATE EXAM 18NOV1994

MED DIAG HEMATURIA, HYPERTENSION, CARDIOMEGALY


It means that the comprehensive medical exam performed by Dr. Brzezinska on 18 November 1994 - according to the form 1017 (10-92) F (M-1-2-3) - was an only immigration medical commission exam before 1999, and was approved or denied on 6 February 1995. So, denied or approved? It could not be denied because the result (the report) of the exam from 18-11-1994 (it was presented above) did not detect any health problems (which would need an attention of Immigration according to Canadian immigration norms), and, certainly, did not detect the cardiomegaly.


An addition - "no more medicals for this case" - is interpreted (as one my consultants said) as "no more special Immigration medical exams", which means: no related to health condition obstacles for the approval of the permanent residence status.


Which is also interesting and important: there was no medical exam or medical tests on 6 Feb. 1995, just a paper revision in Ottawa (Vegreville), and an actual exam took place in Montreal on 18 Nov. 1994. Therefore, the positive validity of this exam could not be denied, and, consequently, the exam, performed by Dr. Brzezinska, was approved by then.


However, an alleged document, signed by Dr. Bertrand and Dr. Beltran, contradicts the very logic, and, consequently, must be a fake.


And, finally, one of my lawyers (probably, Miroslaw Jankowski) told me that the form and the layout of this document do not correspond to 1995 requisites, but to 1997 or 1998 (or later) standards. In such a case, the forgers have not managed to find formularies corresponding to 1995, and used the forms, circulating in 1997 or 1998 (the oldest they could obtain). [If this observation is correct.]


There are also other innumerous reasons to doubt the discussed document"s authenticity. One of them is an additional paper with Dr. S. Bertrand"s notes:


It is obvious that this document was printed on a defective, old, and reused paper, to give an impression that this paper was from 1995. But the print out and writing does not correspond to this paper"s qualities.


Which is also amazing: is that this particular document was, probably, the very basis of a roguish campaign, and started the whole process of medical crimes against my mother. This is an only among similar documents that refers to 3 numbers: 599, 429, and 401 (probably, other documents). However, none of the documents with such marks were sent by Immigration on Maitre Doyon"s request. Maybe the digits correspond the paragraphs of Immigration Law? I am not an immigration lawyer, and I don"t know.


So, let"s go to the text:


" Diagnosis: hematuria, hypertension, cardiomegaly.

This 60 year old refugee (claimant) was noted: on examination to have: cardiovascular and renal abnormalities.

The findings are such that a serious disorder which may be expected to cause excessive demand cannot be excluded at this time as the applicant has only been assessed under the medical provisions of Section 19 (1) (a) (i) of the Act (public health and safety).

Due to the presence of these abnormalities, the applicant should be informed to seek medical follow-up. A new medical is required if the Immigration status changes".


The declaration about the "renal abnormalities" was an absolute bluff, and this is a proof that the claims about my mother"s cardiomegaly could be the same bluff even in December, 1999 - February, 2000. If my mother would suffer from a serious heart disease by then, they would have no need in an additional falsification about a renal insufficiency.


No graphology expertise needed to understand that the style and writing of S. Bertrand and J. Beltran are identical to the style and writing of doctors J. Saint-Germain, MD, and W.A. WaddelI, FRCSC, who signed another notorious document of 26 September 2000 (see below).


And, because doctor S. Bertrand has participated in further medical repressions against my mother in 1999-2001 (possibly acting behind the backs of doctors Walter A. Waddell and J. Saint-Germain), it is clear that he was one of the key figures and conductors of the whole scam.


And, by the way, the right document of 2 above presented documents is probably the most notorious one, and was composed even before the previously presented document, marked "valid to: 10 Jan 1995".


It says:


"This 74-year-old applicant has moderate mitral and tricuspid regurgitation with left atrial hypertrophy and early pulmonary hypertension. She has hypertensive heart disease as an addition al risk factor. She requires ongoing specialist care. It is reasonable to expect that her condition will deteriorate and that she will require specialized cardiac hospital services such as invasive heart investigation and valve surgery. With reference to departmental condition reports /costing data, these services are expensive and cost significantly more than the amount spent annually on the average Canadian. According to the Fraser Institute Report "Waiting Your Turn" current provincial availability studies, there are also waiting lists for the health services required by the applicant which, in turn, could result in displacing Canadians and permanent residents already waitlisted. Due to the probable medical requirements, the applicant's admission would cause or might reasonably be expected to cause excessive demands on Canadian health services. Therefore, the applicant is deemed inadmissible under subparagraph 19(1)(a)(ii) of the Immigration Act."


Amazingly, this document has nothing to do with Immigration law, because this is a pure political, anti-immigrant statement, disseminating certain ideological views in a form of hatred and discrimination. And I believe that the whole campaign against my mother was built on this ideological bias of hatred. Instead of looking into the fundamental problem with the Canadian health care system, very well designed, but discriminatory and dysfunctional in practice, the bureaucrats and politicians want to distract attention from this problem, using racist, neo-Nazi ideologies. And the Fraser Institute is just one of the loud-hailer of such ideologies (to a certain degree).


Thus particular document is decoding the whole mechanism that was behind the medical terrorism, employed by criminals in the Immigration"s medical department, as well as in other bureaucratic institutions, and used against myself since our arrival to Canada.


As I mentioned above, because doctor S. Bertrand has participated in further medical repressions against my mother in 1999-2001 (possibly acting behind the backs of doctors Walter A. Waddell and J. Saint-Germain), it is clear that he was one of the key figures and conductors of the whole scam.


I believe that all the documents of the specific FOSS form were prepared by him:


If so, it was him, who put my mother in a limbo, by indicating "PA FURTHER_;

PA INADMISSIBLE_; FINALIZED_;", and triggered all the humiliations and mockery, and he conspired with M-me Roy, Dr. Brzezinska, and J. Beltran (if such a person ever existed), in forging a fake document, allegedly dated my mother"s heart problems to 1995.


To mask his identity, Dr. Bertrand used to change his signature 6 time; here are some of the examples:


This, I believe, was done to give an impression for a superficial glance (and lawyers often have no time for a closer look) that these are different persons.


An honest man, with no criminal intentions at his workplace, has nothing to hide, and would not employed different signatures as a camouflage.


The goal of such a camouflage was to distract attention from the fact that he was actually the initiator (on behalf of Minister of Immigration, Elinor Kaplan, and senior Immigration Health department, Elenor Morgan) of so called "medical inadmissibility" campaign against my mother, and the same person signed under a backdated fake document, allegedly, been produced in 1995.


It was HIS signature (but no his name mentioned) under a ridiculous insinuation about my mother"s "renal insufficiency":


And, again, comparing the left (obtained approximately in August, 2001), and the right (obtained around December, 2001) copies of the same document (the left copy just had a dirty print out, but this is the same paper), we can see again false dates of entering in FOSS.


The same Dr. Bertrand has produced another offensive document:


So, the pivotal role of Mr. Bertrand is undeniable.


He was also the undersigned of the next document:


When we lived at Aylmer, and my mother at Durocher: we often used to go up the Mont-Royal mountain on foot, and went to the Old Port, also walking, and my mother never complained about short breath or chest pain, never stopped, and enjoyed walking. It would be absolutely IMPOSSIBLE, if she had the cardiomegaly and other severe heart problems back in 1995. The first signs of her heart degradation were admitted in 2001, as a direct impact of Immigration"s humiliations, which damaged her heart and ruined her health.


If Immigration"s officials would stop the offence against her by then, it is possible that the damage could be minimized and reversed. But humiliations did not stop even when the officials have realized that they already inflicted a dramatic harm to my mother"s health.


These slaughterers were murdering my mother with cold blood, and they must be accountable at least in people"s memory, if not in the legal perspective.


However, the main coordinator and planner of illegal medical terrorist acts against me and my mother was Elenor Morgan (possibly, a relative of JIAS" chef, Ed Morgan). All letters from the doctors and from Dr. Giannakis (this is the most important fact) were in the end (after proceeded by other Immigration medical officers) directed to her.


It is possible that this is her signature under the next document:


(an order to send a document dated 6 Sep. 2000 to Dr. St.-Germain)


However, there are actually 2 handwriting styles: of S. Bertrand and Elenor Morgan. They discuss an unknown document, dated 6 September 2000. And they decided to involve Dr. St.-Germain (probably, known for his unethical attitude) into the oppressive campaign against my mother. It means that the same S. Bertrand was acting behind the scene in 2000, which confirms that the fake document backdated 1995 was forged by him in 1999. Maybe, instead of 06/09 it must be 26/09, and, if so, this corresponds to the document, presented above and signed by J. Saint-Germain, MD, and W.A. WaddelI, FRCSC. If so, there are much far reaching outraged implications.


Even after receiving alternative medical opinions of more than 15 medical doctors (including Dr. Giannakis; Dr. Jast; Dr. Crelinsten; Dr. Kostyuk; Dr. Rohan), which contested fake Immigratio's assessments and in effect equated their actions to war crimes, M-me E. Morgan, Mr. St.-Germain, Mr. Bertrand, Mr. Waddell, and others did not stop their criminal actions, and continued their repressions against my mother.


In his email to Mr. Waddell, Mr. St.-Germain wrote:


To: CIC-Montreal@2948RQS@CIQC

From: Saint-Germain.Jacques@8303RNH@CINA

CC: Waddell.Walter@8303RNH@CINA

Sbject: EPSTEIN, Elisabeta YR 3.....-.... OUR (6 digits)

Attachment: Beyond.rtf

Date: 01/21/2001 11:39 AM


The above-named applicant was made medically inadmissible (M5) for MODERATE MITRAL AND TRICUSPID REGURGITATION on September 26,2000.


We received additional information consisting of:

1- a letter from Dr. Ivan Rohan, dated January 10, 2001;

2- a letter from Dr G. L. Crelinsten, January 8, 2001.


I have reviewed the new information and the letter that was sent to the applicant by L. K. Chiu, immigration counsellor. The Chiu's letter refuses the applicant for the wrong reason. Consequently, some of the arguments brought forward by the applicant's physicians address the wrong issues. It is inappropriate for this office to rebut an argument based on an error.


I would then suggest that you send an amended letter to the applicant and ask him to respond to the new letter of refusal.


Walter G. Waddell MD FRCSC reviewed the entire file and concurred with this decision.

Jacques Saint-Germain MD

Senior medical officer

Immigration Health Services

JAN 23 2001.


_________


Mr. St.-Germain is trying to lay the blame on Mr. Chiu, while Mr. Chiu is just vocalized what the vicious doctors Morgan, Bertrand, Beltran, Waddell, and others did. For Mr. St.-Germain (what can be read between the lines), the error and wrongness of Mr. Chiu was the declassification of Immigration medical officers" role and their formulations in my mother"s case. Mr. St.-Germain was also twisting the logic upside down by completely transferring the sense of my mother"s case to a false direction. His note is extremely cynical beyond any limits: let"s imagine that 4 policemen have shot an innocent person justifying it by a particular pretext; their actions have already led to an irreversible tragic outcome; their victim is already in a reanimation unit; and then, instead of a remorse and apology, their constable is saying that - as the pretext was a "mistake" - victim"s lawyers" arguments "address the wrong issues" (wrong issues because the shooters made them "wrong issues"), and calling to his colleagues to find another pretext to shoot the victim again!


Besides, he purposefully confusing the dates: Dr. Crelinsten report was sent to Immigration on 27 July 2000 (sent to Dr. Rohan - January 8, 2001).


In my opinion, such cynical sadists were engaged into the war crimes not because they had no choice, but because someone has purposefully chosen particular personages, driven by anti-immigrant, racist, Zionist-extremist, Nazi, or another hatred doctrine, to deal with my mother and me.


This opinion is supported by the notes of normal, ordinary Immigration agents, who were outraged by their colleague's actions, and expressed their concern:


To: Kirimkiroglou.Vivian@2948RQB@CIQC

From: Hislop.Anna@8303RNH@CINA

Cc:

Subject: Gunin Elisabeta

Attachment:

Date: 05/13/2000 12:53 PM

re: fwd: (GUNIN) Elisabeta 21-03-1925


Good day Vivian:


Mary forwarded the request to me and 1 do apologize for the delay in responding. The applicant did a new medical in December '99. We furthered her for additional information which has not yet been received. It was sent to the address provided.

Regards,

Anna


From: Voisey.Mary@8303RNH@CINA, on 03/31/2000 8:44 AM:


Hi Anna,

This is an inquiry from Montreal regarding a 'further'.

Thanks,

Mary


---------- Original Text ----------


From: KirimkiroglouVivian@2948RQB@CIOC, on 30-Mar-00 2:10 PM:

To: Voisey.Mary@8303RNH@CINA

Ref : Yr file 7000-000000 Our file 2000-000000


Hi Mary.

I'm writing to you with regard to this client who was assessed M5 in 1995 and as of 29-12-99 FOSS registers that she has been furthered. She is otherwise ready for landing. Could you please advise how long until she will be notified to go for further testing? Her current address is 0000 .... St., apt. 115, Montreal, PO, H3W 3H1.


Thanks for your help,

Regards,

Vivian Kirimkiroglou

Counsellor

CIC Montreal Inland Services


Tel: (514) 496-1094 Fax: (514) 496-1881

_____


It is important to notice that the normal Immigration officers address to my mother as Gunin, not Epstein, and this is very significant.


Some of the Immigration officials secretly helped us, and I cannot name them, because even now they might be punished, or their close ones may have troubles.


That"s why I never wanted to stigmatize people of a particular profession, religion, nationality, or ideology. It is important, who you are, but the most important thing is your personal choice, and you can always do good deeds, while you"re alive.


Dr. A. Giannakis and Dr. Zigmund Jast suggested that doctors with family names like "Crelinstein" or "Reisler" must help someone with the family name like "Epstein", and, thus, sent her to Dr. Crelinsten (Crelinstein) and Dr. Reisler, but that was a mistake. My mother did not want to understand that her main enemies were people with this particular background, and that they are conducting a campaign, which can kill her. She was looking at the typical pathological draft of people with such a background to use unethical, forbidden methods - through the pink eyeglasses, and ignored my advice not to approach Dr. Crelinsten and Dr. Reisler. With my principle not to judge people by their origin, skin color, religion, or community, I wished I was wrong, but the reality has demonstrated my suspicions about "...steins" conflict of interests to such a degree that I was astonished and did not want to believe at the beginning, and could not imagine that even the suggestion of Dr. Crelinsten about the juvenal character of my mother"s heart problems was "invented": and took it in all good faith.


However, the need to turn to Dr. Crelinsten and Dr. Reisler could not materialize if Dr. Brzezinska acted differently. On my request, my mother went again to Dr. Brzezinska, trying to convince her to contest Immigration"s insinuations about my mother"s "medical inadmissibility" in a letter to Immigration. However, Dr. Brzezinska refused to manifest a human approach to my mother"s case.


In a contrast to Dr. Brzezinska, other medical doctors were deeply shocked and revolted with the brutal actions of immigration authorities, and - on their own initiative - suggested to send their alternative opinion to Immigration.


First letters to Immigration from Dr. Giannakis, Dr. Jast, Dr. Yung, and 3 other doctors: were submitted to Immigration in May - September, 2000. However, by then Immigration"s administration completely ignored them, and it seems that they did not add these letters to my mother"s file, in exception of 1 letter from Dr. Giannakis, who (as an Immigration doctor) had a support within Immigration.


Here (below) are 2 letters from Dr. Giannakis; 1 have contested ridiculous and unlawful Immigration"s insinuations:


2 letters from Dr. Giannakis, July - September, 2000.


As we could see from the dossier and as our lawyers said, the main figure in the oppressive medical campaign against me and my mother was Elenore Morgan.


Now, I return to other events; we'll go back to Dr. Crelinsten and Dr. Reisler later.


CHAPTER 9.


I strongly believe that the Federal Canadian Ministry of Immigration has conspired with other ministries for employing illegal, criminal, forbidden by International and Canadian laws methods. In contradiction to out statutory situation and to the law, the Ministry of Immigration used to sabotage or unlawfully postpone the work permits (employment authorization) for me and my wife, and study permits for our 8-11 y.o. children. Having no work permit, we were forced to apply for welfare, but after 1-2 months welfare used to be terminated under illegal excuses and reasons. When all income sources were artificially cut off, I had to offer my professional help in exchange for food and closing; we were using food banks; and we received help from the churches, where I was singing as a choir singer, etc. However, seeing that we"re surviving, Immigration and other federal agencies then demanded income statements, threatening us by deportation (during interviews at Immigration at St.-Antoine 1010) under a pretext of violating a law about employment.


In January 1996 we were denied a work permit (employment authorization) under a false, forged pretext, which reveals not only the methods of withdrawing and destroying common legal documents by the governmental bureaucrats, but the medical data as well.


Here is an extract from my complaint on the denial of the work permit:


"(...) I was denied an employment authorization under a false pretext that my older daughter (a minor, 10 years old child), allegedly, has not completed her medical exams.


Through Canada"s Immigration Centre I discovered that her medical record was somehow erased from her file. November, 18, 1994, me, and all members of my family (including my older daughter) have completed our medical exams by Dr. Wanda Brzezinska, an Immigration practitioner. Mine, and mine medical records expire in May, 1996. My present employment authorization expires in February, 1996.


The very fact that my FORMER employment authorization WAS granted to me, means that my older daughter"s medical examination WAS known by then (if your statement that "in order to issue an employment authorization to you and your wife you and your dependents in Canada must complete a medical examination" is true).


You prevent me from submitting a new application "until the results of your medical examination are known". Does it mean that me and all members of my family must complete new medical examinations, or just my older daughter (as you claim)?


In the same time, when - coming to Immigration at St.-Antoine, 1010, and investigating about the new medical exams - I was told that if we want to complete new medical examinations BEFORE our previous medical exams record been expired, I have to obtain your authorization. When I approached Dr. Brzezinska for help, she told me that without Immigration"s approval she"s not going to issue new medical exams for immigration formularies.


Meanwhile the timetable for my request has been violated. According to the rules, I have to submit an application for the extension of an employment authorization in advance, not later than 1 month before the present authorization"s expiration date.


Therefore, I demand:


1) To find and to restore my older daughter"s medical records.

2) To send me application forms for new medical exams for me and my family members in time.

3) To ensure that the date of my request will be counted from the date of my present submission of the request, not from the date of resubmission".


It is obvious that my request for the work permit was just sabotaged, in violation of all the laws and regulations, and nobody was made accountable.


In the end of 1996 or the beginning of 1997, a similar sabotage of the work permit occurred, forcing us to apply temporarily for welfare, but the Ministry of Security of Revenue has sabotaged and stopped our welfare since 1 April 1997, using a pure criminal method (see below). [As other health, immigration, and social services, all of them just adored sending the most vicious notices on Easter, Christmas, NY (1 Jan), or 1 May (Workers" Day)]:


It is obvious that M-me Manon Gilbert (or her supervisors) might deliberately send a mail about an interview to a wrong address (instead of contacting a welfare recipient by phone, which used to be a common practice), did not call her client when the mail returned, and pretended that the applicant did not show up for an interview. However, it becomes clear that she never submitted any letter, but just pretended that did it: when I came to M-me Manon to see the mail (which, she claimed, has returned with a stamp "moved") she refused to show me an alleged mail. Few days before she also lied that she sent us a welfare check, while she was preparing a scam for refusing us welfare. Here is an extract from my complain about this affair:


"When we did not receive the April welfare check, I went to our agent, Mrs. Manon Gilbert (2 April 1997). She told me that our welfare payment check WAS sent, and we must wait. When I demanded that she should show me in the computer, where exactly the check was sent, she refused me. When I called her Friday (April, 7, 1997), and demanded to replace a check that she claimed she sent by another one, she also refused. She told me that if we have no money to buy food, we can take children to the street - ask for cash.


Monday, the 7-th of April: we received a letter from welfare, signed by Madame Manon Gilbert (see above), dated 1 April 1997, telling that our welfare was stopped because, allegedly, I refused to attend an interview. It means that, when I came on April, 2, 1997, M-me Manon was blatantly lying to me, or that her mail about the welfare termination was backdated by a forged date. When, on April, 8, 1997 (Tuesday), I spoke to M-me Manon Gilbert again, she accused me of not attending an interview, and claimed that a mail, which, allegedly, she sent to me on March, 19, 1997, concerning the interview, has returned with the stamp "moved". And she was keeping accusing me for an alleged refusal to attend an interview on 27 March 1997, and made the next decision: "You are no longer eligible for income security benefits, effective May, 1, 1997. You are ineligible for the following reason: you failed to attend an interview". She also refused to explain, why the welfare was stopped in April, if its termination supposed to be effective (according to her letter) since May, 1, 1997.


When, on Wednesday, April, 9, 1997, I came to welfare to M-me Gilbert together with my wife, and we asked her, why she was lying about the welfare April check, which was, allegedly, submitted to us, and why she concealed about the alleged mail with the appointment date and the mail, which was dated "April, 1, 1997" - and was telling about welfare"s termination: she claimed that the letters were sent in her name, but by somebody else, and she knew nothing about them. Then I asked her: "Is that your signature on the letter about the welfare refusal?", and she kept silence. We demanded to cancel the unlawful decision immediately, and inform us by mail, and to send us the welfare check without any further delay".


Not only efforts to find a job were incompatible with Immigration"s oppression (innumerous interviews; threats by deportation; etc.), but the sabotage and constant delays of the employment authorization made the job search merely impossible.


In the same time, welfare was stopped several times under unlawful, illegal claims. In October, 1997, I personally returned the welfare check to the welfare agent, because again we starter to work. However, I informed the agent that this job is temporary, and asked not to close our file yet. But, in violation of the law, our file was closed:


Gouvernement du Québec

Ministère de l'Emploi

et de la Solidarité


Centre Nouveaux-Arrivants

55 rue Port-Royal E

Montréal Qc QC H3L 3T1


Page 1 of 1


File No.: 00000000000


NOTICE OF RULING

GUNIN LEV ET ----------

201-3455 RUE AYLMER

MONTREAL QC H2X 285


Notice issued on:

October 21, 1997

Decision No.: 000000000


Dear Sir:


We are maintaining the cancellation of your file effective November 1,1997.


You are ineligible for the following reason: you have an undetermined amount of

excess resources.


Since you have claimed refugee status, you are ineligible for an income security program for as long as you have not obtained that status or, by another process, the right to resident status. Your eligibility was evaluated under section 25 of the Act respecting income security; however, the decision rendered cannot be reviewed or appealed.


It is important to note that you have the same rights and obligations as all other income security recipients.


Yours truly

SIVAKUMAR MATHIYAPARANAM

Employee responsible for this decision

872-8834

_________


And this was, probably, 1 of 2 most human welfare agents!


In 1996-1997 Bell Canada used to pretend that we, allegedly, rented phones, faxes, and other equipment from Bell, and refused to pay the monthly fees. It took us many efforts, paperwork, multiple trips to Bell"s office at Jean Talon metro station, etc., to stop this scam. It happened 2 times, and last 3-4 months. Every month Bell used to send us bills for equipment that we never took from them, and charged also huge fine for, allegedly, unpaid bills.


In the end of 1995 and in 1996 our electricity bills almost doubled. We asked tenants of other apartments in the same building how much they pay, and discovered that we pay much more, while having a smaller apartment, less electrical devices, and economizing electricity as much as we could. We had no air conditioner, no TV, nothing that could demand exaggerated electricity bills. I filed a complaint, and Hydro-Quebec"s administration treated our complaint with compassion and responsibility. They even sent an inspector. However, the inspector verified the meter, evaluated the charges for electricity taking into consideration our electrical appliances, but did not find anything wrong. But after the inspection our bills stopped to grow. It means that very sophisticated tricks were employed to increase our electricity bills, but after the inspection it became risky for someone, and the scam was canceled.


When we received the landed immigrant papers, the Federal and Quebec Ministers of Revenue used to stop child benefits, shelter allowance, and other payments, which guaranteed by law to every landed immigrant and (later) Canadian citizen.


In the same period of time, we did not receive granted by the law student authorization, in contradiction with the Canadian and International law, which resulted in the next demand from the school F.A.C.E.:


"97/11/5


3449 rue Université

Montréal, Québec

H3A ZA8


M. et Mme Gunin (514) 845-6183

3455 Aylmer #201

MONTRÉAL, QUEBEC H2X-2B5


Sujet: [childrens' names]


Chers parents,


Fin août le gouvernement du Québec a adopté un décret qui oblige les écoles а

demander aux parents, dont les enfants ne sont pas nés au Canada, l'un des

documents suivants:

- Le passeport canadien,

- La carte de citoyenneté,

- Le formulaire IMM-1000 - Immigrant reçu,

- Le certificat de sélection du Québec pour les réfugiés (catégorie R8) avec date non

expirée.

- Les parents qui ont un visa canadien d'étudiant ou un visa de travail temporaire

doivent aller а la Commission scolaire, avenue Fielding, pour compléter une

demande de visa d'étudiant pour leur enfant.

Nous comptons sur votre coopération а ce sujet en nous transmettant par retour

du courrier ou en apportant а l'école une copie conforme d'un des documents

mentionnés ci-dessus. - -- - - - --

Faute de ne pas avoir reçu ce document le 21 novembre, le gouvernement vous

facturera les frais scolaires de votre enfant qui pourraient se chiffrer entre 2,300.00

$ et 4,900.00$.


Nous comptons sur votre rapidité а répondrai а la présente et vous prions de

croire, chers parents, а notre entier dévouement.


N. Primiano

Directeur

NP"


A similar letter came from COMMISSION DES ÉCOLES PROTESTANTES DU GRAND MONTRÉAL.


It said :


" Inscriptions et transport scolaire

Registration and Transportation Services

Date: Le 29 octobre 1997

Aux: Directions des écoles primaires et secondaires

Sujet: "Résident du Québec"

---------------------------------------------------------------------~-~

En date du 28 août 1997, le ministère de l'Éducation du Québec a adopté par décret le règlement sur définition de "Résident du Québec". Selon le nouveau règlement, les commissions scolaire doivent identifier tous les élèves qui ne répondent pas à la définition établie et percevoir des droits de scolarité. " --- and so on.


To ruin further our socioeconomic situation, Immigration demanded certified copies of the birth certificates, marriage certificates, death certificates, and tons of other documents almost every month under phony pretexts. Often they scrambled our submissions of the certified copies, demanding a certification from another notary or another lawyer, forcing us to pay again and again for the same paper.


Here are some of the copies, certified by different notaries because of Immigration"s demands (birth, death, marriage certificates):


..................


Totally, there were 68 types of documents that Immigration demanded from my mother as certified copies, almost each time declaring the copies void and demanding to certify them by another notary.


.........


The repressions have totally destroyed my mother"s health, who was not a fragile individual by the moment of entering Canada. She certainly had no heart disease by then, as IMS insinuated. Every attack on her by Immigration and Revenue ministries" bureaucrats has resulted in a blow to her health, and last 8 years of her life have turned into an increasing torture. Having looking after her in her miserable condition, I was tortured as well, and all my close ones. She was an exceptional person, and has dozens of friends, and the injustice and cruelty towards her has affected many people and undermined their trust to Canadian state.


My mother could live 10 or 15 years longer, maintaining a normal life, instead of going through indescribable torments, if not Immigration"s sadistic persecution, which provoked a stroke... This was a slow murder with cold blood....


[END OF BOOK 2 -- CONTINUED IN BOOK 3-1 (NEXT)]


________________


Lev Gunin


THE PUNITIVE HEALTH CARE

[HEALTH CARE AS A REPRESSIVE TOOL]

BOOK 3-1


WHO DESTROYED MY VISION AND HEARING?


BOOK 3 - PART 1.


THE CONTENT.

CHAPTER 1

CHAPTER 2

CHAPTER 3

CHAPTER 4

CHAPTER 5

CHAPTER 6

CHAPTER 7

CHAPTER 8

CHAPTER 9

CHAPTER 10

CHAPTER 11

CHAPTER 12

CHAPTER 13

CHAPTER 14


* * *

The whole text of the chronological events and medical documents (under the name of "The Punitive Health Care - (Health Care as a Repressive Tool)" is available for examination only on the basis of the following contract between the author and the reader:


I (THE READER) GIVE MY CONSENT THAT, BY CLICKING CORRESPONDING LINKS AND ACCESSING THE TEXT OF "THE PUNITIVE HEALTH CARE", I AUTOMATICALLY AGREE TO THE FOLLOWING PRELIMINARY CONDITIONS [FOR READING]:


-- I am (at least) 18 years old.


1. I (the reader) is undertaking (commit myself) not to distribute the text of "The Punitive Health Care - (Health Care as a Repressive Tool)" - entirely, or in fragments; not to copy medical documents; and not to share the text and images without author' permission.


2. I (the reader) understand that the confidential information, which is contained in this text, cannot be used for any other [than the reading (extraneous; secondary)] purposes and needs, for any researches, essays, stories, etc.


3. I (the reader) commit myself not to sneer at open ticklish personal information (which sharing was induced by circumstances), not to savor any medical, physiological, or anatomic details, and not to use this text as a reason for mockery and persecution.


4. I (the reader) am warned by the author that, except for a number of obviously immoral (by definition) doctors' and medical staff's actions, other decisions and acts described in this "confession" are not subjected to hasty moral assessment because a) only experts can judge finally about their justification and fairness; b) explanations and vindications of other party are necessary. We also do not know to what degree the doctors were under an influence and direct power of police, Ministry of Immigration, and other enforcement agencies, political organizations, groups and persons - with their own ideological, economic, and propaganda interests, - and to what degree this influence impacted on their diagnostic conclusions and assessments of patient's state of health. Many of the documentary confirmed facts incontestably demonstrate that author's ideological stand (who's opposing to younger generation's transformation into zombie-biorobots with mobile phones on shoulders instead of heads; to electronic totalitarianism with its prison-like total video surveillance; and to the tyrannical political censorship) played nearly a major role in enraging the authorities and triggering the persecutions.


5. I (the reader) am warned that the author sees the main cause of the most dramatic (for him) events in the fact that the enforcement agencies and interested persons and groups managed to present him to the medical community as an individual incapable to evaluate his health condition objectively; as a health-consciousan (or hypochondriac); an extremist; a troublemaker; an individual obsessed with panic and alarm patterns; as a person, who is making unreal demands to the system of medical care - concerning his - allegedly - pseudo-maladies and exaggerated gravity of trivial indispositions. This smear campaign of defamation, scurrilous libel, and wicked calumny made impossible receiving an adequate medical care (and sometimes any medical help at all), and led to health undermining, numerous diseases, incidents, and unnecessary sufferings. Doctors also considered difficult to believe in continuous (not connected with each other) illnesses, with an interval of 4-7 days, sometimes rolling at the same time: as tsunami. They refused to believe in these sequences of illnesses' painful course, danger, and significance. This chronicle disproves such a prejudiced opinion, producing an incontestable evidence.


6. I (the reader) am informed that all negative remarks, characteristics, and facts' assessments belong only to the portrayal of criminal groups, extremists, and carriers of anti-humanistic, racist, and totalitarian ideology, but do not contain groundless generalizations and negative assessment of any country, ethnic group, or religion. The author is categorically against dismantling of any of the existing states, and against restrictions of the rights of religious congregations of any faith.


7. I (the reader) am informed that this edition partially presents the previous 2017 edition without any changes, and, thus, may not correspond to later view and opinions.


8. I (the English reader) am informed that some parts of the following English text of "The Punitive Health Care" - were translated from Polish, Russian, or French originals, and may contain primitive language, double interpretation, or puzzled meaning. Such confusing fragments should be compared with their originals in Polish and Russian languages (author's native languages) [2016-2017]; all controversial points must be resolved through such a comparison.


9. In the very last moment of this edition's make-up (April 2023), the author came across a description of so-called Havana-syndrome, and found same symptoms and complications, which he experienced when was attacked by an unknown remote weapon (3 Nov. 2005, 7 Jan. 2013, and 21 June 2016), and developed symptoms of post-microwave irradiation.

_________


CHAPTER 1


Since 1998 (to the end of 1990-s) my ears were blocked several times by the serum accumulation. For this reason, I visited an otolaryngologist at Royal Victoria hospital. He treated my problem with the forcible water stream cleaning. Thus was a very old methodic (for sulfuric stopper unblocking). Back in the XIX century: even by then medical scientists suggested that this method can seriously damage patient's hearing. In the 1930-s, there were several medical articles in Soviet Russia, which suggested cleaning the stopper by olive or turpentine oil, etc.: before turning to the forcible waterstreem option.


In the process of deportation from my native Belarus and running from country to country, my medical notes and books were lost, and I could recover some of the them only in 2004-2006. I was isolated by the authorities and provocateurs from the immigrants' "information machine", and the search engines have already started to block me by then. And our Immigration ordeal, surrounded by a very stressful situation, caused my memory loss; so, when I came to the doctor concerning the sulfuric stopper, I did not remember about the olive or turpentine oil, etc.


However, even considering my lost knowledge - I was surprised that such a "dinosaur method" is still in usage in such an advanced country as Canada.


Everything was made even worse by the nurse, who, being a strong, massive woman, used a brutal violent force to inject the waterstream into my ears. Each time the doctor and the nurse used to clean the sulfuric stopper - ears' pain followed for more then 1-2 weeks, and every loud sound was hurting my ears.


Before recovering my knowledge and notes, I went for this procedure 3 or 4 times.


Another objective factor was associated with the flu and further similar infections. Sometimes I had 1 or 2 ears blocked after a flu. This all started after 2001, when I got a UTI [which was "predicted" by Immigration officials and by an MCI doctor - for my refusal to "surrender" to the Infectious Disease Unit: after Immigration's fake fluorography (see Book 1 and 2)]. Thus, my hearing and vision were damaged because of this UTI infection and its mismanaging (actually: a medical sabotage) as well.


My vision and hearing were equally damaged by the systemic and systematic politically-motivated sabotage, which used to destroy my computers, my literary and historical texts, my musical works, and my printed in Finale or in other software applications notation files. During and after massive computer viruses' attacks, or because of other vicious offenses, I had to overstrain my eyes and my heating to minimize the damage and to restore my works. BELL telephone company, as well as our direct Internet and Phone service providers sabotaged the email and Internet connection, disconnected our phone frequently, and committed innumerous acts of sabotage and provocations, and, again, I had to overstrain my eyes in the process of dealing with it.


The maxillary trauma (and other injuries, inflicted by inhuman dentists, or because of the cruel governmental medical policy concerning the dental medical care) has also affected my hearing and vision (see Book 6: The Dental Ordeal).


My vision was also damaged by the inaccessibility (for low-income people) of eye-glasses in Canada and in other countries, which practicing the License to Kill (to kill for profit): because I was in need of eye-glasses since 2005, and could never (till the present day) afford them.


The cost of 1 pair of medically prescribed eyeglasses can range in Canada approximately from $300 to more than $1,500.


2 major eye-glasses producing companies - Italian Luxottica (which owns Oakley glasses and Ray-Ban) and French Essilor (the owner of Crizal, Transitions, Clearly, etc.) - are controlling the whole global production and trade of eye-glasses, enjoying their monopoly, inhumanity, and impunity. However, this year (in 2017) they merged, acquiring even a greater grip over the world market's neck. They not only control the eye-glasses shops prices and supply, but also a lion shares of e-commerce, crashing their competitors online.


Finally: the computer systems producers, and companies like Intel, Dell, Compaq, Asus, Microsoft, Apple, and so on: they were damaging their customers' vision and hearing because of their unsafe (in 1990, or even in the beginning of 2000-s) equipment, while they should not be allowed to enter the market until developing relatively safe monitors and audio devices. While they and the governments made normal people's life absolutely impossible without computers, they did not care about few generations, which became victims of mass vision and hearing loss. Being guilty of damaging eyes of billions of human beings, they left their victims without an ophthalmologic care preserving the access to ophthalmologists (or to the proper care) only for the rich. Because of my socioeconomic situation, I could afford only cheap monitors, headphones, or loudspeakers, and their negative impact to my vision and hearing was definitely important.


However, in spite of all above listed problems, my hearing till 2005 was still satisfactory, and could remain so in the future if not 3 inexplicable vertigos. Each of those 3 episodes have led to a sharp and abrupt vision and hearing loss.


I experienced no dizziness - till November 3, 2005 (my birthday!), and then - before a similar incident on January 7, 2013, and then - till June 21, 2016, for only one exception. A strange short loss of balance accompanied by the feeling of pressure upon my face or on the nape, ringing in my ears, short-term sharp decrease in hearing, and other symptoms: used to happen several times during my walks with my friend Yu. On August 1, 2009; June 1, 2010; August 1, 2010; June 1, 2011; July 1, 2012 - short-term dizziness, weakness, ringing in the ears, sight and hearing disturbances.


(On arrival home: a normal blood pressure (120 х 78); I was drinking enough water before the walk).


On July 2, 2012 (after yesterday's walk with Yu.): a nasal bleeding (repeated till July 4, 2012: 4 or 5 times); plentiful hematuria accompanied by bladder"s gripe (mulligrubs), with a bright red blood. On the same day: enterogastric bleeding with the same scarlet blood.)


November, 3, 2005, Thursday.

It is necessary to describe separately what has occurred on November 3, 2005 (my birthday).


My attention was attracted by a person, whom I have noticed long before - often sitting or walking directly across the street (the opposite to our balcony street side, slightly to the left), where there was something like a cement border.


I have slightly opened the balcony door to see him (and examine) better, and, facing an open door"s break, have suddenly felt a sharp and strange indisposition as though the earth has shaken under me, and some sort of darkness in my eyes followed. Right there a wave of nausea has hit me, combined with the cold sweat.


I have lain down, and have overslept 2 hours, and, when has woken up, all my clothes were completely wet on me though it was quite cool in the room.


The blood test, occasionally done for other reasons in the beginning of December 2005, has shown 15 thousand leucocytes. However, the medical doctors did nothings about it, did not issue any additional tests, and did not repeat the blood test after such a serious event.


The nausea returned from time to time and did not pass completely 2 or 3 more days. Then - within several months - strongly illuminated places or rooms have caused some unpleasant feelings in me, provoking a headache.


When I was tired, or simply by the end of day - the headache used to return. But the sudden decrease in hearing was the most terrible for me as for musician. Only in some days later I have connected it with that incident.


As the abruptly arisen and inexplicable acute unwillingness has rather quickly passed, I have not paid a visit to any doctor right away, but after November 8, 2005, I went to the outpatient clinic at Royal Victoria hospital - where my statement about the headaches and nausea has been ignored, and - concerning the hearing degradation - I was referred to an otolaryngologist who has directed me for the hearing check (an audiology test). This test has revealed some changes in hearing, but on the border within the norm though till November, 2005, I possessed more delicate ear than the majority of other people. (See below)


In this story the attention is attracted by some details:


1) why it has occurred precisely on my birthday (it is necessary to remind here that many repressions and provocations by the enforcement agencies (including the Ministry of Immigration) were carried out (against me and other people) on the New Year eave, or Christmas, or birthday, or fell on other similar dates of the special value [read Books 1 and 2])?;


2) I was, probably, provoked to open the balcony door;


3) particularly in the end of 2005 - beginning of 2006 has begun an absolutely new (incommensurable with the previous) stage of police intimidation and other repressions against me;


4) the symptoms of that short indisposition coincide with the similar symptoms during similar incidents, but (later) with more serious consequences: January 7, 2013 (it is exactly the day of the orthodox Christmas) and June 21, 2016 (at night of June 21-22, 1941, fascist Germany has attacked the Soviet Union);


5) and, finally, as after a probable attack by means of an unknown remote weapon on January 7, 2013, and on June 21, 2016: an open sabotage of rendering medical care and diagnostic procedures (on June 21, 2016 - so scandalous that it is simply "does not climb in any framework") [which cannot be explained by any reasons, except of the cover up operation]; a microwave radiation or a blow of a distantly directed sound wave of a special nature: the most probable explanation of all 3 cases.


3 inexplicable accidents have destroyed not only my hearing, but my vision as well. However, vision"s weird fluctuations began years before. First vision disturbances happened back in 1999, under very disturbing circumstances, and in the period of aggressive repressions by the Ministry of Immigration, with the participation of Dr. Wanda Brzezinska.


Shortly before the radical change (sharp deterioration) of Dr. Brzezinska"s treatment, I was stopped by the Security in the shopping center Alexis Neon (across the street from Dr. Brzezinska"s office), and scanned by some instrument, like a metal detector.

On the same day, something happened to my sight: it became difficult to see; the letters in books have blurred; my eyes were tired; I could not concentrate a look on the text...

The ophthalmologist, who treated my mother, kindly agreed to examine me, too. He has not only examined my vision free of charge and prescribed the eyeglasses (which an optometrist usually does for money), but also sent me to several additional tests.

Doctor Brzezinska, my family and immigration doctor, has to sign these referrals (due to my immigration status and immigration norms), but she flatly refused. So, Dr. Brzezinska was the doctor, who"s not only guilty in helping the Immigration authorities to persecute me and my mother, and to forge the fake medical documents (see the first two books of this series), but also became the first person, who sabotaged an ophthalmologic care for me.


Dr. Waldron"s eyeglasses prescription.


Few months later, my vision has restored by itself.


The 1-st of 3 inexplicable sickness attacks with vertigo, vomiting, etc., which occurred on 3 Nov. 2005, has deteriorated not only my hearing, but also my vision.


My family doctor was by then (in 2005-2007; temporarily) not constantly Dr. Rohan, but Dr. Pushie (a very knowledgeable therapist) as well, who, on this stage, treated me very well, and, after mine complains, referred me to several medical specialists, including an ophthalmologist.


The events around "the first stage" of my treatment by doctor Pushie have a special, extremely important value in my medical epic.

These events slightly open a curtain over such deeply hidden and concealed mechanisms that give a unique chance to see my epic in the new light.

This revelation became possible because - in a case with doctor Pushie - the adequate medical care was sabotaged not at the level of the family doctor any more, but at the level of the access to those specialists to whom I was directed by doctor Pushie (or, in other words: to those specialists to whom I unsuccessfully tried to obtain a referral for many years from other therapists).

As soon as I got the wished referrals (to these specialists), the access to them was blocked already at the level of their secretaries (if the secretaries "did not let" me to the specialists on someone"s instigation).

And the fact that I did not manage to book ANY rendezvous in the referrals of Dr. Pushie: is the most scandalous fact.


On skeptics" mistrust, I adduced such an argument.


For all years - from 1994 to 2015 - I used ALL referrals to specialists, which I only received from different doctors, except one (I did not manage to see an "alternative" gastroenterologist at St.-Mary's hospital, because his secretary blocked me the access).

2 otolaryngologists, gastroenterologist, a surgeon, 4 dermatologists, 2 rheumatologists, later - 2 urologists, and several other specialists: till 2015, I used all the referrals, having become the permanent patient of those specialists.

Another thing is that the referrals to specialists were not given to me timely (as well as the referrals for many tests and exams), but only when the URGENCY has already passed. If I could see the specialists in time, and if all these specialists would treat my problems adequately, I would have become a healthier person in the world.


On this background - whether it is possible to explain that I (if would act on my own initiative) refused to visit the specialists on Dr. Pushie"s referrals? Everyone, who will investigate into my story, will understand that it is nonsense.


It is hard to say for what reason doctor Pushie directed me to all specialists, whom I asked: probably, because the Community Westmount clinic had a special policy on this matter, but - whatever improbable it was - it gave me a potential access to dermatologist, gastroenterologist, otolaryngologist, rheumatologist, and orthopedist, to ophthalmologist and urologist.


And here the most interesting begins.


The sabotage of booking an appointment to any doctor in Dr. Pushie"s referrals, at the level of secretaries, did not allow me to be seen by any of these specialists, except the dermatologist, Dr. Beatrice Wang (top-class doctor). But Dr. Beatrice Wang - probably - accepted me only because I already visited her in Royal Victoria hospital since 1997, and was already her patient.


The requisites on the tests also did not solve any of my problems because any of the tests, which I made on doctor Pushie's requisites (except, in my opinion, of one single), did not arrive to Dr. Pushie"s office...


Unsuccessfully trying to receive the copies of these tests" results from the medical archives and through other doctors, I came to Dr. Pushie, hoping that she will allow me to make copies. But Dr. Pushie - just as Dr. Piche, and other doctors (except of Dr. Rohan - but only after 2005 or 2006), claimed (concerning a number of tests) - that she does not have their results-reports, and openly expressed a mistrust: as though I did not do these tests, and I only fool them all (all the doctors).


I will not hide that, in return, I saw Dr. Pushie (at that moment) as a participant in a conspiracy with the laboratories, and - apparently - I was wrong.


Thus, the closure of an access to specialists (despite all the referrals of Dr. Pushie), and the disappearance of almost all tests, laid the foundation for mutual distrust that can be an illustration to a normal pattern, which torpedoed my treatment even at the best and human doctors.


At the beginning, I did not dare to ask Dr. Pushie for the help in booking the rendezvous with those specialists, having considered that - after such a huge "favor" (as the referrals to so many specialists-doctors), a request for such a help is already just an impudence. However, later I determined that I took an erratic decision.


During the next meeting with Dr. Pushie, I brought up this question, but she told that neither she herself, nor the policlinic has nor time, nor the resources for that, and that I shall try to obtain the rendezvous myself. It happened after the "cooling" of our relationship, and, probably, I addressed to her with this request already too late...


I am, of course, not a doctor, and I do not know, how I would have reacted on doctor"s place to the fact that a patient to whom the doctor did an improbable favor in the form of sending him to so many specialists (a "favor", which an ordinary Quebecer cannot get for years under the "free" healthcare act), but, suggesting from pure human reactions, it is possible to assume that the whole doctor"s enthusiasm and all the aspirations to help such a patient - shall disappear.


And, when the same patient comes - and says that the whole packet of blood-urine tests results (reports) - disappeared (and the doctor cannot remember about all the requisites for the tests, and, it is not excluded, does not notice all of them in the official reports): it does not add any trust.


So "the second stage" of Dr. Pushie"s treatment began, in a sharp contrast with the "first" one: because all her attempts to help me, having directed me to a whole "army" of specialists - were gone in vain, and she - by logic - shall lay the fault for it on me.

How it was possible to treat such a patient now? How still it is possible to help him?


Already a further relationship with Dr. Pushie in terms of the goodwill between the doctor and her patient - was torpedoed from the outside.


After that, her refusals - in response to a number of my requests, - ignoring of my questions concerning particular medicines, and my complaints with the description of symptoms and indispositions, and refusals (concerning these symptoms and illnesses) of any medical drugs have followed.


And it is quite a natural response of the doctor to what have occurred.


However, it cannot explain some wild, weird, odious tricks of Dr. Pushie "at the second stage", which you should not even write about...


But in the story with doctor Pushie there was something really contradictory and a little bit more complex.


So, this doctor issued for me a number of referrals to all specialists, to whom the access was blocked for me by other "local" ("family") doctors (therapists).


She (among other referrals) issued for me a referral to an ophthalmologist. (See below)


The referral to an ophthalmologist, administrated by Dr. Pushie.


I got this referral (to an ophthalmologist) from Dr. Pushie on January 18, 2007, when began visiting her after a long break again.


During this period, I the right eye was often hurting as if a painful tension did not fall down there. Naturally, I could not measure the intraocular pressure (IOP) myself, and was afraid that it is higher than a norm, which can lead to glaucoma. Remembering that my mother suffered decades from glaucoma, I also got a referral to ophthalmologist from Dr. Pushie. I got this referral from doctor Pushie on January 18, 2007.


Later, having subjected to a revision the majority of my records, and having again reviewed the majority of the medical documents (assembled by me), I can restore the broad picture of what have happened by then.


Having got a referral to an ophthalmologist, I (from the middle of January 2007) began to call the phone (514) 843-1613 (specified in the referral).


My calls were responded by an angry, hostile voice of a 30-40-year-old woman, who was ordering every time "to wait" on the line. And every time, after 25-30 minutes of waiting, I was disconnected.


Only in April 2007, when I called the same number, my call was answered by another - higher and quite friendly - voice belonging to another secretary.


I asked to book me an appointment with the doctor, as soon as possible. However, in spite of the fact that I accurately outlined the situation to this "new" ophthalmologist's secretary, having once again added that I must see the doctor due to an urgency situation, and that I suspect a high IOP, she booked me an appointment only for June 19, 2007.


When I took an interest whether there is an opportunity to register me to a closer date, this secretary told that in the receptions registry I am already registered for this date.


Who and how could book me an appointment for 19 June 2007, if - till April 2007 - I never managed even to talk to another secretary and to dictate this date? (And, the most important, even to tell, who I am, and what is my name).


Moreover, unimaginably that a patient with a referral from another doctor (who never visited this medical specialist before) would received an appointment withous sending the referral by fax in advance.


For the avoidance of any doubt (just in case) I sent the referral by fax, having learned their fax number (514-843-1618) from the "kind" secretary, but forgot to ask about clinic"s address and the office"s (or the room) number.


Shortly before June 19, 2007, I received a phone call from the secretariat, from the phone number (514) 843-1613, and the "first" - spiteful and angry - voice has declared to me that the date of the rendezvous was changed, and that now it is August 23, 2007.


I tried to argue, but it was useless. The "angry" secretary not only shut down any discussion, but even refused to dictate me the address of this ophthalmologist"s office, having mentioned that I "will be called in 2-3 days" "before seeing the doctor" "concerning the address".


At the beginning of August 2007, another (the polite) voice called me from the number (514) 843-1613, and reported that my meeting with the ophthalmologist is rescheduled again - now from August 23, 2007, for June 15, 2008 (!!!).


Of course, I was indignant, having called such a transfer outraged, meaningless, and unacceptable. I also asked whether they reschedule a rendezvous to other patients so many times and for such a long period (for a year!).


Surprisingly, she agreed with me at once, and in couple of seconds found another date - September 14, 2007.


I had an impression that she, reading out from a source the rescheduled date "15 June 2008", was shocked not less than I was.


Because of this stressful situation, I forgot to ask about the clinic"s address once again.


However, on 11 or 12 of September, 2007, the "1st" (unfriendly) secretary called again (not the number 514-843-1613 was highlighted on the telephone"s display now, but a Private Number), having thrown into the tube that, instead of September 14, 2007, I shall come on September 18, 2007, at 8:00 in the morning.


But on September 17, 2007 (again Private Number), she called again, and declared that now the date of my rendezvous will be September 21, 2007.


Then she at once disconnected, without having even informed, in what time I shall come on September 21, 2007.


For this reason, in the morning, September 19, 2007, I called the phone 514-843-1613 again: to learn the exact time of my rendezvous. I was not lucky - because I came across the same spiteful secretary once again, and - as soon as I named the date, - she began to shout at me, claiming that a rendezvous was never appointed to me, and that no one ever called me from this clinic.


Struck, I listed her all dates and time of all assigned by phone appointments, and told her that I did not take them "from my head".


Then she said that I am "not even in the system" - and it, apparently, means that my data was erased from both the computer system, and from paper (as I assume) printouts.


I told her that I talked to her so many times that it is simply impossible that she just don"t remember my voice and my file, but she claimed that she "knows nothing" about my voice, my name, etc.


Having been indignant, I said that, maybe, it was she, who erased my data from the computer network, and promised that I "will not leave it so", and that I will go "to police, to newspapers, everywhere". But (that shocked me even more) she even did not dare to refute my accusations!


She only said that I, "anyway, will prove nothing".


On my announcement that the calls from the phone number 514-8431613 were saved to my phone"s memory, and can be seen on its display-caller, and that the calls" printout of from BELL"s distant exchange will prove that I was receiving multiple calls from this number - she only burst out laughing, and told that the number 514-8431613 is just a general phone, and the incoming calls from this number will not prove that somebody called from the office of doctor Chang (or Chen, Chan, or Chien). [Interestingly, doctor"s name in the referral was, definitely, not Dr. Chan.]


I immediately wrote a complaint addressed to this ophthalmologist, and sent it by fax. In 2006 I decided to keep the audio recordings of all telephone conversations with medical institutions, and started recording them, and now I intentionally listened to the last call from the ophthalmologist"s (Dr. Chen [or Chen, or Chien"s]) secretary: to be sure that I confused nothing.


I never received any response or an apology to my fax.


All other referrals, signed by Dr. Pushie, were sabotaged in the same way by doctors-specialists, or by their secretaries.


After these ordeals with the referrals, there were many dramatic events: my mother had a hip pin fracture; I was attacked by strangers; and (on October 2, 2007) I was hit by the car Quebec 998 PPH.


Nevertheless, on December 3, 2007, I sent another fax to the office of doctor Chen (or Chang, or Chien), having slightly added and modified the initial text. It is significant that I did not receive any response to my repeated complaint.


It is necessary to add one more fact to this narration. Since June 2007, I unsuccessfully tried to find the address and data specified in Dr. Pushie"s referral to this ophthalmologist by means of the Internet, but faced a problem with the search engines, such as Google. By then I captured the monitor"s screen, but those old pictures of the search engines failure ceased to open now. When now I (in the same way as by then) copied the ophthalmologist"s phone number 514-843-1613 to Google"s search window: Google gave out again that NOTHING - according to this information - was found. (See below)


But in my own wide database (2015), where the addresses, phones, and faxes of almost all Montreal"s medical institutions were collected, I managed to find easily (without an effort), which institution stood behind the phone number 514-843-1613 (indicated in Dr. Pushie"s referral). It was the ophthalmologic clinic Royal Victoria Hospital Ophthalmology Clinic, and the doctor was - Dr. Jean Deschênes. The clinic was located at: 687 Pine Avenue West, Room E4.68, Montreal, Quebec, H3A 1A1. (See below)


It is a pity that I had no such a database yet 8 years ago, and I had to rely almost exclusively for the World Web... It is interesting that other search engine - Yahoo - gave the correct answer (to request of ophthalmologist 514-843-16-13):


When I printed in Google"s window the same request, but the phone number digits - without the "dash" between two last groups of digits, Google also gave the correct answer. It seems that in 2007 I could not find the address of this clinic because inattentively treated such "trifles" as joined-up writing of the last 4 digits of a telephone number, and therefore - during this period - usually wrote these digits "16-13", not "1613".


This "puncture" is quite explainable in the context of the constant pressure and never-ending provocations, which keep me in a "suspense mode", and do not allow focusing on "trifles".


And, at last, just for speculation: the spiteful secretary of the ophthalmologic clinic has booked me a rendezvous for 21 September 2007, but on the 20-th of September 2007, I was attacked by 2 strangers, and on October 2, 2007, I was hit by car Quebec 988 PPH.


Despite Dr. Pushie"s referral to an otolaryngologist, I could not get to this doctor as well: it appeared to be impracticably to obtain an appointment with him (or her).


I managed to get to another otolaryngologist - an elderly doctor, whom I used to visit in 2005. This is just another evidence (proof) that the access to all specialists, mentioned in Dr. Pushie"s referrals, was closed for me in an evidently coordinated and systemic way.


Concerning hematochemia, Dr. Pushie issued (on January 25, 2005) a referral to gastroenterologist. However, an access to this doctor was also blocked. Another method was used by then to block me an access to this doctor.


It was written by Dr. Pushie"s hand on the referral"s page "June 13, 2005, room E2.53, 9:00".


It was not clear, if that appointment should take place in the Royal Victoria hospital.


Doctor Pushi ordered to hand over this referral to the registry where they will put a stamp and "explained everything" to me. But, when I handled this document in the registry, I was told there that I will receive a call concerning this referral and this rendezvous, i.e. that I must wait for a call. In which hospital this rendezvous should take place, or with which doctor: nothing was told.


During this period, there was a sudden acute vision degradation; my eye were burning, and everything blurred, and there is nothing surprising that I "did not note" the date of this rendezvous in the upper right corner of the (that happened because of my absent-mindedness multiplied by a temporal serious visual disturbance).


Having come home and having heard (from the secretary) that - concerning this rendezvous - I will receive a call, I shelved the referral, and temporarily generally forgot about it.


But approximately on Thursday (9 June, or on Friday, 10 June 2005), I - by a lucky chance - came across this referral, and began to clarify urgently in what hospital or policlinic I should go, and what its address (because there was only the date and the room number on the referral, but neither address, nor the phone number, nor the name of the hospital). See the copy of this referral below:


In a rush, I called Dr. Pushie"s community policlinic. Fortunately, I managed to get through quickly. I dictated all the attributes of this referral to the patient and polite secretary (including the date of the rendezvous and the room number). I had to call back 4 times - because the secretary, probably, was busy with other patients and with other things, - meanwhile trying to clarify where and to whom I was directed. But even by the help of the secretary, I managed to clarify nothing.


I remember that all the time she tried to obtain from me information to what doctor I was directed, what was this doctor"s surname. But in the line "consultation with..." there were only 2 letters: GI. I dictated this to the patient secretary, having immediately thought that these two letters - mean "gastroenterologist", and it means that there is no name of the doctor there.


I do not remember whether I tried to communicate with doctor Pushi, whether she worked by then (Friday, June 10, 2005). But, if I tried - I did not manage to speak to her.


After my call to the clinic, I also called several hospitals, and there, too, they tried to clarify where I should have come and to what doctor. I received the phone numbers (for booking an appointment) for all gastroenterologists (including Royal Victoria Hospital), whom I called on Friday as well, and even on Monday, but there was no records about my rendezvous or any mentioning of me anywhere.


All also ended with that.


Later I found the hospital (judging by the room number), but no records about my appointment, or about me lost rendezvous with the gastroenterologist existed there.


And through some time, I got another referral to gastroenterologist from my family doctor, and this specialist (Dr. Szego) became - since that moment - my permanent gastroenterologist to whom I - since 2005 - have no complaints to this day (2016).


This whole story with the gastroenterologist in the referral of Dr. Pushie looks as "turbid", as the story with the sabotage of the ophthalmological care.


Any one who will look at the line "the referral to..." - and will not find any doctor"s name there, will be puzzled. Something does not meet here...


Other doctors - doctor Hammadi and doctor Tulangdi (or someone among their colleagues) - also tried to arrange for me an appointment with a specialist-gastroenterologist. It is confirmed by earlier documents and records. But something went wrong with this exam as well, because (according to my notes) - having come to an office where the gastroenterologist should examine me - where I was brought by the therapist"s own hand, - I waited at least an hour, and nobody came to see me.


On the referral of Dr. Wanda Brzezinska, I (during a short-time period) visited another gastroenterologist (Doctor Mishkin), still in the mid-nineties (concerning a gastrointestinal virus).


Doctor Mishkin, by the endoscopy"s result, has prescribed a course of antibiotics that for several years stopped the gastroenterological problems.


Another specialist-gastroenterologist (Dr. Szego) was a great doctor and a decent person, and made for me everything that was possible. But his efforts were torpedoed by the massive disappearances of the test results (reports), which made his medical help almost impossible.


In 2007 or 2008, Dr. Szego carried out the test of endoscopy in Royal Victoria hospital, but the whole its result (report), together with the microbiology, completely vanished.


I only swallowed the "gut" in vain.


Since the disappearance of that endoscopy report, the infinite problem - the disappearance of the tests results - began to evolve. Because of the loss of endoscopy"s result, and also because of (as it seems) probable falsification of all other tests (analyses) on microbiology in that hospital, the dermatitis with ulcerations (bringing harsh sufferings, and, for months, not allowing me to sit: only to stand or lie down) kept tormenting me for years...


So, to the gastroenterologist on Dr. Pushie"s referral I was not fated to get, too.


The same happened to all referrals to specialists signed by Dr. Pushie. The access to them was artificially blocked: it's obvious.


So, Dr. Pushie made for me more and granted more than my own requests, but - for some reasons - something "went wrong" with all her efforts, as well as with the tactics and the strategy of Dr. Piché. For some "inexplicable" reasons I could not get practically to a single doctor-specialist, to whom she referred me, and for the same "inexplicable" reasons the majority of blood and urine tests disappeared, and never arrived to Dr. Pushie"s office.


Subjectively, from her point of view, the absence of my visits to specialists and the absence of tests" results (reports) had to look as my personal guilt: laziness or unwillingness to register, or to visit a doctor, or failing to communicate ("to treat") doctors" secretaries, or an indiscipline, absent-mindedness, etc.


Not excluded (moreover: very possibly) that she also read the loss of the tests (analyses) an "imaginary" loss, and suspected that did not go to do them, or confused something, etc.


From the "height" of one decade, I accumulated several questions and conclusions which, alas, did not come to my mind by then (in 2005-2007).


Why I managed to register and get on reception to all doctors (except the gastroenterologist, Dr. Luterman, and those doctors to whom I simply did not go because the problems disappeared) on other doctors" referrals, and could not book even a single (except for the dermatologist, doctor Wang) appointment to specialists referred by doctor Pushie?


Why the majority of the test results (blood-urine tests) made with Dr. Pushie"s Dr. Pharandd"s requisites, just vanished somewhere, and only much smaller number - relating to other doctors" requisites (for example, of my family doctor (1-2 from dozens!), and ANY on Dr. Krasny"s requisites?


Not therefore, whether the doctors on Dr. Pushie"s list, most likely, could really help, and there was a high probability that they will figure out the correct diagnosis or diagnoses, but the doctors, whom I visited on my family doctor"s referrals, already were known by then for their collaborationism, and would do what they would be forced or what would be ordered to do?


Not therefore, whether specialists, to whom other doctors sent me, MORE OFTEN really helped me to get rid of concrete illnesses: sprains, "otolaryngology" and other problems, and Dr. Beatrice Wang helped to keep the dermatological problems - an explicit consequence of some other disease and complication of the systemic disease - under control.


It cannot be told about Dr. Morris who fundamentally destroyed my health, and - because of whom - I could die. And just Dr. Pharand, who was engaged in sabotage, was a doctor, to whom I was directed NOT by my family doctor and NOT by Dr. Pushie...


It is possible to assume that something similar is connected also to the loss of the tests results, which were administrated NOT by my family doctor, and NOT 3-4 of 7-9 doctors from the English hospitals and policlinics.


What if Dr. Pharand (even if he took a jaundiced view to me and was destroying my health on a personal initiative or of someone's pointer) could not "wave away" from the tests results with an explicit pathology in the system of the French hospitals (and this is why they disappeared), and doctors Semret, Gershkovitz, Krasny, Morris, and some others of the system of the English hospitals were given a green light ("right-away") in case of just "anything"?


Not therefore, whether for years progressed complications, because these 3-4 doctors were very strictly prohibited even to concern a bacterium detection by means of a swab test, or to approach the preliminary treatment of 2 possible types of arthritis: Reuters syndrome and the "urological" arthritis, etc.?


If - from time to time - courage, whether hope (which never was dying away in them) to bypass somehow these bans and to help the patient to everything in defiance woke up: ordinary agents-provokers from among the medical technical personal, junior medical staff, administrators, or security - were put in action...


If I am not mistaken in dates and periods, in 2 years after our 1-st meeting any initiative of Dr. Pushie already died away, and nearly angry hostility and suspiciousness appeared.


So well familiar refusals of tests, medical examinations, medicines and referrals to specialists - followed; odious responses to my questions, and the mocking manner of communication, which was already reminding the style of Dr. Pharand.


Typical announcements of doctor Pushie of that period: "What can be painful there? There is nothing that can hurt there!"; "Hematuria? No trouble, sometimes it is even useful"...


By then the tests, which Dr. Pushie administrated, already ceased to disappear, but some indications forced to doubt about the authentic origin of their results.


One more curious part.


Judging by questions, which Dr. Pushie strutted, and considering her wide knowledge of the different fields of medicine, she was a very good specialist, but never read any own assumptions or diagnoses.


And so was from the very beginning.


The clear link between the pikes of the urological problems recurrence - and inflammation of joints - furnished to doctors a clue of the cause of a systemic disease. But, as well as other doctors, Dr. Pushie was silent, without offering any explanations to this phenomenon.


One of my consultants - a cardiologist from Dagestan, - in 2011 made the assumption (according to a hint of his colleagues): Reuters syndrome.


A number of blood-urine tests as though confirmed this guess - especially as the antigen, mostly characterizing this systemic disease, was revealed by one of blood tests. But this report later disappeared, too (and, in addition, I could not find it in me own database any more).


I suggested a link between the urological and "arthritis" symptoms to doctors Rohan, Krasny, Morris, and others - nearly during each meeting. But all of them did not react in any way, or waved away, or boldly and unthinkingly denied any possibility of the presence (for example) of the Reuters syndrome. The rheumatologist, doctor Krasny - repeatedly categorically said: "You have no Reuters syndrome".


When I asked to explain what such confidence is based on, he only waved away.


Once I began to demand persistently an explanation, why I could not have this (Reuters syndrome) or another systemic dysfunction related to urinal tract infections and similar disorders, and by what criteria it is known. By then I already thoroughly studied a preliminary treatment of this syndrome (or similar urinal infections-driven syndromes) on medical literature. But doctor Yiri (Ury) Krasny told - as cutting off - "it is visible according to the tests", and did not wish to speak more on this subject.


It is obvious that arthritis, ophthalmologic problems, damages of skin and mucous membranes, and others: are complications of another, earlier, infectious disease. In fight against these collateral problems, I used a combination of alternative medicine"s remedies that first well helped. Elbows and knees pain completely passed. But once the infection returned after an overcooling or an intake of spicy food (on forgetfulness): and the problem (joints" acute pain) returned.


The fact that it temporarily completely disappeared, means that no essential pathological changes in joints by then occurred yet.


At a border of 2005-2006, I returned to my former family doctor though sometimes (when that was required by urgency) still visited doctor Pushie, if my most permanent family doctor could not see me.


CHAPTER 2


JANUARY, 2013.


At the peak of grave deterioration

(its detailed description - on page http://samlib.ru/g/gunin_l_m/kill-2012-s-nov.shtml) -

I have persuaded the family doctor to prescribe an antibiotic of a wide spectrum - Protrin, - which soon after the beginning of the course has caused side effects, rather terrible in themselves.


I was lucky that have stopped it "at the last minute". However, even an incomplete course of Protrin has appeared enough to force the infection to disappear completely. Pain, bleedings, dysuria, impact on kidneys and other organs: everything has stopped at once.


Since the end of October and the beginning of November, up to December 2012: everything was in norm, as till 2001.


All these years (12 years!) doctors assured me that it is not an infectious disease, but a somatic problem (a systemic disease of several organs), and an infection meanwhile made my life miserable.


I never denied that this might be infection-provoked systemic disease but as a such it was not treated! And, secondly, all these years the infection fed a systemic disease without which it could disappear "by itself" (or after a treatment (if was TREATED).


Attacks of deteriorations and recurrence obviously reminded the infectious recurrences, however, doctors steadily held the ground.


I have made all possible tests and have passed all possible exams, including the most unpleasant and invasive, equated to surgical intervention.


The answer was invariable: "we have found nothing". As it became clear later (when the repeatedly requested and "not found" reports (results) were suddenly (in 7 years) "found" in the medical archive) - not "absolutely "nothing".


Atypical (mutational) transitional cells [and reactive atypical cells] ["cannot rule out carcinoma": was written additionally] were already present in 2004, and that was not just it.


In the aforementioned by the references sections it is described in details about the manipulations with the medical tests which most part vanished; some other represented nonsense. Just this alone that all 3 tests, which discovered an infection, have been issued by the doctors from outside of Montréal, or done in a laboratory outside of Montreal: already speaks much. These tests have found eleuterococci, entherococci, and streptococcus. And what could reveal all vanishes, or absurd, or incomplete (with lost pages) tests: we can only guess.


And here - 12 years later! - ALL symptoms "were gone" at once as though nothing ever happened. So, whether it was impossible to carry out an active antibiotics therapy 12 years ago, in January - February 2001?!!


12 years the infection was destroying my organism, and I was meaningly brought to such complications" scale that not only undermined my health, but also could even take away my life. And nevertheless, my persistence and understanding of the doctor who has issued Protrin, it seems, have beaten both this plot and the illness (for a MONTH of a complete remission).


And a new aggravation of December 2012, has been also surprisingly quickly defeated by my self-treatment, and again, it seemed, an "unprecedented" for me remission has established for a long (as it looked) time.


Since the end of December 2012 - and up to the Orthodox Christmas (January 2013) NOTHING disturbed me. Such a situation has occurred FOR THE FIRST TIME since 2001: because EVERY DAY brought a next and a next problem, and there was not a single DAY without bothering urological, rheumatologic, dermatological, gastroenterological, vascular, and other problems (bringing real torture) in my life.


But any period for the passed 13 years could not even be compared closely to what has begun after January 7, 2013 (after an "inexplicable" vertigo with vomiting, diarrhea, jumped leukocytosis, and other symptoms), because after that case I was overtaken by a real living hell.


And, as though mocking, the circumstances have palmed off a new misfortune in a "packing" with the whole bouquet of puzzling coinciding accidents.


It happened exactly at midday (at 12.00), on the exact day of the Orthodox Christmas 2013 (figure "13"), and day after I (for the first time) has sent messages (including my electronic correspondence) to friends about a wonderful, "inexplicable" recovery?


I will list other "coincidences":


1) it happened 1 hour after Sergey Balandin's message about the publishing (on Internet) of the following material:


http://www.balandin.net/Gunin/chrono-police1.htm;


and


2) 15 minutes after sending this link to friends;


3) when I was at home alone;


and


4) when was sitting facing the window;


5) for lack of any preliminary indispositions, symptoms or syndromes;


6) coinciding with the renewal of Internet"s and telephone"s systematic shutdowns (an indication that my activity irritates someone);


7) coinciding with the (for the first time for all years of my creative activity) mass sabotage of the access to my Internet-pages in Russia, USA, and, possibly, in Israel (I received oral messages that my pages "are not opening"); one of my articles was blocked with a special refinement...;


8) coinciding with the renewal of administrative, economic, and other diversions [pressure] (wheels of our car were punctured 3 times; [it was described in other documents of this series how our car was smashed (destroyed) 5 times broke); there was a new campaign of illegal penalties and forged bills, etc.];


9) coinciding with the continuation of police intimidation (http://www.balandin.net/Gunin/chrono-police1.htm), one of which goals might be provocations of the stressful situations for the purpose of blasting my health.


So, on January 7th, 2013 - an unexpected dizziness suddenly begun (at that very moment I sat beside the window; and around 15 minutes before - I walked near the window, watched TV and worked on the computer (near the window, too). Dizziness has never occurred before in my life (in exception of 3 Nov. 2005 (see above), and it was such an unbelievably spinning vertigo that I have grasped for what have got with both hands, being afraid to fall from the chair. I had "fallen down" (slipped) to the floor; and - with huge difficulty - managed (supporting myself on four points (otherwise I would simply fall down to the floor) - to crawl to the sofa.


In the same moment - plentiful cold sweat. In 4-5 minutes, the dizziness has passed away, but the fear and disorientation remained. Such a thing has never happened to me. After 10 minutes (all this time I continued to have a shower bath of the cold sweat) the vertigo has come back - but even more intensive. Now I could not seat (not mentioning: to stand) even having leant against the wall with both hands having seized for something. I was lucky that during the breaks of the dizziness attacks I managed to reach a place, where I could take the horizontal position, in time.


Particularly bizarre was the following: when I passively lay on my back on the floor, on the sofa, or in bed, the vertigo has proceeded with the same strength, and, all the surrounding has spanned in my eyes without restraint as though I was positioned on a carousel, which was rotating with a fantastic speed.


In other words, this condition was not related to head turn, rising, or changing the body position. The cases of such an improbable, "superfast" rotation of the surrounding in the absence of any influence of head turns and changes of the body position are called "vertigo" in medical literature, but even the descriptions of this condition do not mention SUCH a fantastic spinning. However, I have found it among the examples of the intended microwave radiation complications.


The phone was near, and I tried to dial the "Ambulance" number 9-11, but everything floated before my eyes, and the digits were spinning so that nothing came out of this intention.


Right there something has pulled me to the toilet where I managed take myself on all fours.


Vomiting and a diarrhea have instantly opened. I must notice that vomiting never occurred to me before. For all my life: maybe, 1 or 2 time with obvious reasons (like stomach infection or not fresh food).


Emetic masses were brown by color (probably with the blood presence).


All this was accompanied by cold sweat and weakness; the dizziness did not stop.


Vomiting repeated several times.


The blood pressure was 133 x 84 (this happens infrequently; my usual pressure: 120 x 75).


The pulse - 92 against my usual 60 (the increased palpitation).


I had crawled to the bed - and replaced 3 sleeveless jackets: all were becoming almost instantly completely wet. 3 towels by which I was rubbing off the wet - have become "pure water" at once, though wring out.


The dizziness has slightly decreased, and it was possible to dial the "Ambulance" number (9-1-1).


Strangely: the line was dead - long beeps proceeded eternally, nobody responded.


Such a thing simply was non-imaginable in Montreal by then.


I tried to call my wife and daughters (I was alone at home): my calls did not get through (too suspiciously strange).


The dizziness has almost passed in 30 minutes, approximately in 10 minutes after the vomiting termination, somewhere in 40 minutes after the "attack" beginning.


I fell asleep; and when I has woken up - the condition was already "tolerable", except for a fever and weakness. (The temperature was 37,6 C).


Around 19:00 I had arrived - with my wife - to the St.-Mary"s hospital"s Emergency room (sending my wife home later).


In the triage room, the blood pressure was measured: 150 x 98! (Approximately from 1993 to 1999 I was taking the pills for pressure, then doctor Bzhezinska cancelled the prescription. The blood pressure did not exceed by the 130 x 90. In 2003 the blood pressure began to jump up again to 140 x 90 (and above), and in several months I managed to get a prescription (not without a fierce fight!) for the renewal of the blood-pressure controlling tablets. Since then (I measure it 2 times a day) the blood-pressure was NEVER higher than 135 x 85.)


I waited till 8:00 in the morning (13 hours!) without being assessed by the doctor (to be more exact: the doctor has just begun examining me, then left and should return - but did not come back). Meanwhile, the Emergency room was not overcrowded; no visible serious cases could be noticed by sight; the people who came AFTER me were: an elderly woman with an erysipelatous inflammation (accompanied by her husband); a girl with her left hand finger"s bruise or a fracture (who came with a guy); another girl with a bruise; a woman without any visible problem (certainly, without any life threatening danger); a man with a flu, who needed just a medical document for justifying his absence at work (he was accompanied by few people); a teenager with the temperature 38 (he was brought by his mother); a woman with a stopped nasal bleeding (she injured the mucous); a Russian couple (she had apparently a mild bronchitis, and needed to be released from work); an elderly man 56-60 y.o. with a moderate attack of radiculitis (he laughed, joked, walked up and down in the hall, read the newspapers and magazines); and 4 more patients whom I saw casually but who almost obviously had nothing serious, etc.


During my arrival (in the beginning) - an ambulance cars have brought 3 seriously ill patients, 2 of whom were soon sent to other hospitals, and since that moment no more patients were brought by the ambulances.


Judging by the queue: I was ahead of 14 or 15 other patients, and should be seen by a doctor before them. I know that, concerning medical institutions, it is very hard to prove, but it is very possible that my admission to a doctor was deliberately delayed. If to judge by the priority of seriousness: well, I would pass the 2-3 (let even logically suggest - 5) patients who have come after me, but not all of them together! If mentioning the young girl or the guy, who came 5-6 hours after me with a small bruise or with a cold just to obtain a medical reference for their employers: they could wait.


A simple common sense prompts that the cases of ALL 14-15 patients - who have arrived after me - could not be more serious than mine. I have accurately declared (and it have been written down) upon my arrival (to the secretary and to the triage nurse) that 1) such a high blood pressure never happened before; 2) after dizziness and vomiting the noise in the ears has started to buzz; and 3) after an attack of vertigo I have admitted the problems with the sight (ophthalmological problems). Already during the conversation in the triage room I have noticed that I hear the nurse"s speech as through a pillow, and have understood that - after the vertigo - there were problems not only with the sight, but also with the hearing. Then I have added that, besides everything else, my hearing has sharply decreased. Besides, the blood test later (I run forward) has shown 13 thousand leukocytes (!), and only this alone has demanded an urgent medical attention. And with all such symptoms they have kept me waiting 13 hours, without having examined even once!


While I waited, a cardiogram and a blood test have been made. And - because the laboratory prepare the preliminary result of the blood test for the Emergency room in 2-3 hours, - the result, which reviled the high leucocytes - was already known, and, still, I was kept waiting 11-10 more hours! They told me that the cardiogram is "in norm", but refused to give me a copy, which could be a sign that not everything was "in norm". I said that I demand to measure the intraocular pressure, and to perform brain"s computer tomography, to check the cholesterol level, to carry out the detailed "delimitation" of the blood cells (CBC), to define or to rule out a presence of a streptococcus or another infection, and to take a sample for an existence of a gastric infection: it has been all refused. The blood test has shown 13 thousand leukocytes that never happened before and that had to sound as a strongest alarm signal. At some instant, not even a single person, except of me, remained in the waiting room (I was completely alone), and, nevertheless, I was not called to a doctor. As well as on October 2, 2007, when I was hit by a car, and had serious injuries, I did not receive any medical help in the Emergency room, this time (January 7, 2013) no medical help was rendered. By then and by now someone could see both incidents as a manifestation of a "hand of the foreign colleagues" or an action of the international pseudo-ethnic "security": a probable microwave or ultrasonic radiation was not excluded. For this reason (other explanations just does not exist), - such a scandalous incident as a refusal of doctor"s exam after the hardest vertigo, with the leucocytes count higher then the norm and the pressure 150 - was outraged!


An avalanche of infections, dermatological and other problems (which are described below) after that suspicious vertigo speaks well for the version of poisoning or (that is even more probable) radiation. NEVER - till 2013 - has occurred such an uncountable and infinite wave of indispositions, infections, and the other sores which practically did not leave ANY DAY without pains and diseases. Never in the previous periods of my life there was such a SHARP decrease in hearing, as after this suspicious incident on January 7, 2013. Never before my vision was so SHARPLY declined. In favor of RADIATION is also testifying the short duration of the main tsunami of the blow to my organism (dangerous for it"s functionality), in the form of the attack limited by time and did not repeated whereas in case of poisoning or a somatic disease the period of a serious condition would last longer, and the assaults of a serious indisposition would repeat. In favor of radiation or an "injury" by some sort of a secret remote weapon tells also the irreversible damages of hearing and sight. The vitreous body detachment (since 16 October 2013 (i.e. the same year), 10 months after the suspected microwave radiation attack, corresponds to the terms of the emergence of the remote side effects (consequences) of microwave radiation, and, in particular, for the vision. The vitreous body detachment was obviously provoked and was also accelerated by something that happened during the MRI procedure (electromagnetic resonance scan) and the X-ray, which followed, and could not begin "casually" on the same day. (See the description below).


Concerning the damage to my hearing, it has occurred practically at once after the incident on January 7, 2013, unlike the considerable damage to my vision - "postponed" in time, that - I am sure - for experts could be a clue to what exactly remote device was used for causing an irreversible harm to my health. It is necessary to add that any dizziness - till November 3, 2005, and then before the similar incident in January 2013 - never, ever happened before, for only 1 exception. Strange loose of the balance accompanied by the feeling of a pressure upon my face or on my nape, ringing in my ears, short-term sharp decrease of the hearing, and other symptoms: happened several times during my walks with my friend Yu.


On August 1, 2009; on June 1, 2010; on August 1, 2010; on June 1, 2011; on July 1, 2012 - short-term dizziness, weakness, ringing in ears, vision and hearing deterioration. (On arrival home - the pressure was normal (120х78), before the walk I was drinking enough water). On July 2, 2012 (after yesterday's walk with Yu.): nasal bleedings (repeated till July 4 of 5 times), plentiful hematuria accompanied by pains in the bladder, with bright red blood. On the same day: enterogastric bleeding with the same scarlet blood.) As to the hearing"s damage - it is necessary to point some additional facts. Approximately in 3-4 months prior to January 7, 2013, I have noticed that 2 or 3 times when I approached the window in the salon, I felt something like a pressure as though the air became elastic, and pressed on my face. It was accompanied by short-term deterioration of my physical condition which right there passed away - as soon as I went to the corridor or to the kitchen. All these cases took place then when the plastic blinds has been mostly lifted up, so, that the window appeared not covered.


After these incidents I noticed a short-term (though, probably, long-term, too) - as it seemed to me - worsening of hearing. Not casually in the fax to doctor Sejean I mentioned 2012 as the beginning of the hearing deterioration. I also wrote in 2013-2014 in uncountable messages to my friends, colleagues, and acquaintances that - after the vertigo on January 7, 2013 - there was a sharp degradation of my hearing, and also mentioned the same in one of the versions of the political persecutions chronicle published on Sergei Balandin"s and Maxime Mashkow"s web sites in 2013-2015. The conclusions of comparing of the 1-st audiology test (2005) - and the 2-nd audiology test (2015) [see in the section for the corresponding period chronologically] also tells a lot about the gravity of this deterioration. This comparison shows that if at the beginning of 2000-s my hearing was almost completely in norm, after 2013 there was a sharp and serious worsening of my hearing at level of a partial disability (partial deafness). It is possible to assume that the susceptible microwave radiation on January 7, 2013 has led to brain injuries, which, in turn, has caused a sharp decrease in hearing.


Below I present a number of other medical documents, accompanied by suggestions and conclusions. Because of the issue of confidentiality, some of the personal information fields have been masked.


This blood test done in the Emergency Room of St.-Mary"s hospital (January 7, 2013, 1-st page), raises a number of question and presents a number of the abnormal results:

1) Abnormal leucocytes - 13 thousand (from the most probable causes - blood cancer, or a reaction to an infection, poison, or radiation).

2) Low indicator of MPV - thrombolytic deficiency - may indicate a sharp nephritic insufficiency (or even a renal failure), blood cancer, acute widely spread infection, either poisoning with life-threatening poisons, or a life-threatening dose of radiation.

3) The high indicator of neutrophils can mean: а) a grave infection / inflammation; b) necrosis (mostly related to a heart attack); c) blood cancer; d) acute grave poisonings with poisons, e) a life-threatening level of radiation. According to academic sources (studied by me), a combination of these 3 indicators corresponds to a very probable exposure to radiation of any type, and, in particular, to the radiation of radio frequencies wave (microwave, etc.). Especially it is necessary to notice that the leucocytes above the norm (11-12 thousands already need an immediate, urgent attention of doctors, urgent medical examination, and the follow ups with a specialist-hematologist with the continuous supervision of other experts at least for some months, but leucocytes OVER 12 THOUSAND: it is an emergency situation, demanding not less medical attention than a stroke or a heart attack). And they have "have thrown me out" from the hospital with this and other dangerous indicators, sending me home without any medical help and without any further tests and diagnostic procedures.


This blood test done in the Emergency Room of St.-Mary"s hospital (January 7, 2013, 2-nd page). It is clear from this page that the doctor who has ordered this blood test, has suspected - by the symptoms - a heart attack or radiation, because the 1-st and the 2-nd is tested by Troponin-i. The substance of troponin - is a protein, "made" of 3 regulatory components: Troponin C, Troponin I, and Troponin T - which participates in the regulation of the cardiac muscle and skeletal muscles" contractions (but not the "soft" muscles). Let's skip the cases of an injury of the myocardium, a sharp coronary syndrome, a heart attack, an acute cardiac quinsy, an extreme tachycardia, and other problems of a cardiac muscle (it is not my case), and take a closer look at other reasons of Troponin"s elevated presence in blood. It is, first of all, are such reasons as poisons (like a poison of a snake, scorpion, etc.), secondly, cyanic calcium, carbon monoxide, and some other chemical poisons, thirdly, an impact of microwave and other radiation on the central nervous system and its consequences. Considering my vocalized suspicions about a poisoning or microwave radiation, the doctor should check not only the Troponin-i, but also 2 other types of this protein. Now, the result of the Troponin-i test, at the 1-st look, disproves the assumption of the poisoning by a strongly acting poison or radiation; however, there is no need for a hasty output (for the premature conclusions). After all, time is the major factor, and the blood test was done almost 10 hours after the vertigo (after a microwave radiation attack), and almost 3 hours after my arrival at St.-Mary"s hospital"s Emergency Room. Plus, in most of the blood tests the presence of Troponin-i is zero (0), or, boldly speaking, in general does not come to light in no way (i.e. equal "0"): so, it is possible to consider such a level as Troponin's 0.10 as its residual presence 10 hours after a poison or radiation attack. Besides, it also depends on which type of the microwave radiation was used by the attackes, and, besides, the majority of laboratories define Troponin's "normal" indicator not above 0.001.


This blood test done in the Emergency Room of St.-Mary"s hospital (January 7, 2013, 3-rd page). On this page almost all indicators are "average", though any of my previous blood tests (approximately since 2008) - indicated on biochemical components at least something differed from the norm. In that case, the result of this blood (on this page) is forged, or some natural reasons "have averaged" indicators. And, since 2 components nevertheless are closer to the top border: the sugar level - 5.7 (in some laboratories considered as pre-diabetes), and bilirubin - 23.8: it is possible to assume that poison or radiation could (it is described in scientific and medical literature) "average" other indicators. I do not remember such high bilirubin in my blood tests (indication of a deterioration of the liver"s function, or a sharp liver"s load - which happens during the infections, or in the result of poisoning, or radiation. A special attention should be given to how the same laboratory (St.-Mary's hospital"s) manipulates the "norm" scales, in one of my tests presenting the top border of the glucose (sugar) level as "5.9", in others as "6.4", etc. It - theoretically - gives a chance to ignore the disturbing indicators in my tests.


Next day, January 8, 2013: a short attacks of dizziness - from several seconds to a half-minute, repeated about 4 or 5 times, and each time - when I came nearer to the same window. No (after the most careful searches) COMBINATION of the symptoms shown at 12.00 on January 7, 2013, was found in the medical literature. However, it is very easy to find such a combination of symptoms in works and articles about purposeful microwave radiation. Practically all sources on radiation by means of the microwave source indicate the emergence of dizziness; many add to this the nausea and vomiting, a part of the articles on microwave radiation mention diarrhea, and the most scientific, specialized, professional, the most informed studies: also mention a super-intensive sweating with a fever (cold sweat), high (abnormal) leukocytes in blood, and the high blood pressure.


The extracts from the scientific literature on symptoms similar to mine, at microwave oven and other types of radiation, are given in details in the section of this series for the beginning of January, 2013.


These "inexplicable" (from the everyday"s point of view) facts of "super-vertigo" and of how I was treated at the Emergency Room at St.-Mary's hospital, a number of parallels and coincidences, and some similar circumstances are pointing to microwave, laser, ultrasonic or ultra-violet radiation as the most probable cause in both - in the same and next year - cases of the vitreous body detachment, with a potential threat of glaucoma and cataract as consequences of the vertigos the vitreous body detachment (and the consequences the scandalous - to put it mildly - negligence in St.-Mary"s hospital, where the medical staff literary knocked me out from the Emergency home - without any appropriate examination and diagnostic procedures (except of the blood test), and without any further follow ups. (See below). Even the urine test was not done!


And, naturally, we come to a conclusion that the unwillingness to "dig" deeper in the poisoning or radiation version was the reason of it: "it will come to no good!".


Maybe, my family doctor "has paid attention" to a combination of the abnormal (high up to 13 thousand) leucocytes, too low MPV and too high neutrophils?


On January 9 or 11, 2013, when I had an urgent appointment with him, and have described him an unusual vertigo (telling him about the events in the Emergency Room and about the blood test made there (I did not know yet about the 13 thousand leucocytes and other abnormal findings), the doctor has pretended as though he had no interest in this blood test at all. It is possible, however, that he has already received a copy, or - while I remained in his office, he told his secretary to print out a copy for him, or have looked at the report in the computer. But it is not excluded that he really DID NOT WANT to deal with St.-Mary"s hospital - and to "interfere" in hospital"s affairs (to cross them in their mismanagement of my case), or, may be, a direct instruction "has been already dumped" to him, with the order "not to steak his nose into this", and, for this reason - he has not considered looking at this blood test, and has sent me for a repeated blood test ONLY on my own persistent requests. (His reaction and actions assume the 2-nd)...


On January 15, 2013, with a requisite where the birdies have marked the components according to my request, I did the blood test which interpretation was ready on January 16, 2013.


The hemoglobin on the verge of low abnormal and the low Ht assume chronic bleedings, as well as low thrombocytes. Leukocytes - within a norm though close to the upper limit of the norm, which can assume an inflammatory process. Anyway, it means that the abnormal high leucocytosis was connected specifically with the vertigo, and, thus, signals about an infection, poisoning, or radiation. Poisoning or radiation are the most probable scenarios for the reason that, if there was an infection, the abnormal aberrations in blood components, and, the main thing, high leucocytes - would be present longer. But from 2 assumptions - poisoning or radiation (microwave, sound, or ultra-violet waves) - radiation is most probable because, again, the acute effects of poisoning would be noticeable longer, causing the suffering by the specific symptoms related to the gastrointestinal tract, and radiation (the attack by means of a secret remote weapon) could leave other specific effects, such as the injuries to brain, eyes, facial and cranial nerves, etc.


When on January 18, 2013 - 2 weeks after the vertigo - I came to the office of my family doctor, he has opened the blood test for January 7-8, 2013 (when I turned to Emergency) through the computer network, but said nothing to me: neither about the high leucocytes, nor about other deviations from the norm, and, by then, I have forgotten to demand a copy for myself. Only 1 or 2 months later I could see the result of this blood test, and then, certainly, would be already too late to protest and to undertake something, if, God forbid, high leucocytes would testify to something very serious and would continue to stay at the same (or even higher) level.


On January 18, 2013, I have told my family doctor about the suspicions concerning this strange vertigo, and have suggested that he may to see the extracts from the special scientific literature on the subject of the symptoms of radiation from the radio-waves, but he did not wish to look at them. I also have expressed a suggestion, that, maybe, after January 7, the dizziness did not return any more, and that what seemed to me as the further attacks of a slight "dizziness" - could have a psychological background. In any case, it happened exclusively during the next day, - the 8-th of January - and only (each time) when I approached to the window.


It is possible that my conclusions are farfetched, but it seemed that the goal of his order for MRI was to bypass a number of some discrete taboos, and examine the version of a possible poisoning or radiation (in spite of the certain taboos like a prohibition of the tomography for me), or an acute infection, using the tools "permitted" for him. Otherwise what sense was to send me for this head"s MRI, if all the episodes of the strongest vertigo, vomiting and diarrhea, with the most intensive sweating - accompanied by the abnormal (high) leucocytosis and neutrophils, and low thrombocytes: were limited to maximum 2 hours in time, and did not repeat any more, and all new and limited by one - next - day episodes of (now: very mild and conventional [not vertigo]) the hardly appreciable "dizziness" were in doubt? To see, whether there is Shvannoma? (A specific tumor along the auditory nerve). I doubt it. A catastrophic hearing loss did not occur yet. The doctor already knew (clicking fingers near each of my ear) that the acoustical "symmetry" is not lost. However, as it seemed to me, the left ear nevertheless heard slightly worse, than the right ear - which never happened before. And, by the way, I sat on January 7, 2013, by the right side of my body to the window, and namely the right brain"s hemisphere is responsible for the left side of the body. (On the other hand, my family doctor checked my hearing, clicking fingers near the left and right ear, just because I COMPLAINED about the sudden and sharp deterioration of hearing (he was skeptical about it, and, trying to prove the "subjectivity" of my feelings, has carried out this test).


(Later, having checked my correspondence with friends, I have found complaints about the sharp decrease in hearing in letters and emails on January 8-11, 2013).


Did he sent me for the MRI to check the vestibular apparatus? Simple and quite well-tried otolaryngological tests are enough for this purpose - and to use the electromagnetic resonant scan for this - is the same as to crush a nut with a steam hammer. It seems that one of the main goals of such an exam was to "filter" the probable reasons of the strangest vertigo by acting on an exception method.


Besides, it is clear from MRI" report and from doctor"s requisite what else exactly he was planning to find out: to examine the auditory (acoustical) and facial nerves from both sides, and, respectively, the functionality of the vestibular apparatus at the level of the central nervous system. All these reasons do not exclude, however, that the doctor DID NOT CONSIDER to examine the version of a sharp infection, poisoning, or radiation. On the other hand, however, it is not excluded that exactly a micro-stroke, radiations, or an effect of an unknown remote device (weapon) he was just checking, because the reliability of MRI for examining the central nervous system (brain) is rather high.


The sharp decrease in hearing in the next months, my vision"s deterioration, temporary headaches, memory weakening, fast fatigue, etc. - were some of longer or even irreversible consequences of what has occurred on January 7, 2013.


I will add that the computer tomography (CT-scan) - which I demanded in the Emergency Room at St.-Mary"s hospital (and then requested from my family doctor) - is unsafe: because of the stronger - than a simple X-ray - radiation. But its effectiveness in findings concerning cranium, brain, vessels, nerves and antrums is not worse than MRI, and in certain cases even more productive.


The digital Text:


"The internal auditory canals and the 7th and 8th cranial nerves are normal in appearance and symmetric. There is a small vascular loop on each side which is in close proximity to the 7th and 8th cranial nerves. A small retention cyst is seen in the left maxillary sinus and there is mild right mucosal thickening. Impression: No significant intracranial abnormality".


So, the radiologist has drawn a conclusion that there is nothing significant. Nevertheless, it was possible to formulate the report (the result) in a different way, or, in other words, having placed different accents. Because such a formulation assumes the refusal in further exams, follow ups, and treatment. The term "Impression" is strangely perceived, used here instead of the standard term "findings", or 2 other standard terms. But how can we know, what exactly the radiologist meant when was formulating her conclusion? Maybe, she meant something completely different than the doctor - when ordered this exam? If - for my family doctor - it was important to EXCLUDE everything that could (theoretically) explain the "ONE-TIME" heaviest vertigo by a suggestion of a micro-stroke or microwave radiation, the radiologist, possibly, understood it, on the contrary, as an attempt (by the doctor) to reject the probability of radiation or a micro-stroke, and, consequently, has written that there are no (unfortunately for someone) any catches for explaining what has happened to me, by any others solid, undeniable, and commonly recognized medical findings, and, thus, the reason and the nature of this vertigo, together with other symptoms of poisoning or radiation - remain unstated... So, any serious, from her point of view (from the point of view of the reasons explaining the vertigo), abnormalities - were not revealed, but whether it so?


But unless - apropos vertigo with vomiting, diarrhea and pathological sweating, combined with the abnormal (high) leucocytes level (13 thousand) and neutrophils, and the low thrombocytes, - it was not necessary to order ALSO a FULL blood test, with the most detailed hematological analysis, and to check, whether liver, spleen, gall bladder and kidneys: were temporarily affected? Still, it is worth to remember that my family doctor - was an only medical professional who has tried to bypass the taboos and cover ups, and - though something available to him - to find out at least something about my "inexplicable" vertigo+pathologies, and the only doctor nevertheless appointed numerous exams and procedures, carrying out the real treatment (even if not absolutely what I expected), who really tried to find out a number of reasons of my medical problems. Besides, he instructed me in many ways, and has actually put a basis of my medical knowledge to an absolutely different (in comparison with the former) level. It is enough to look at requisites and prescriptions, having noted the lion's share of his appointments whereas I visited other doctors often not much less than him. My visits to walk-in clinics and Emergency Rooms, my visits to specialists (dermatologists, urologists, gastroenterologists, rheumatologists, etc.) terminated in overwhelming number of cases without any results whereas my family doctor did though SOMETHING (it is possible to assume: what WAS HAVE ALLOWED to him). But for what purpose? It is a good question.


Now I will "decipher" what the MRI has found, and what is possible to conclude from it:


7-th nerve: it is the facial nerve which paralysis leads to the effect of the "warped" face. This nerve is responsible for a facial expression, feelings of the touches to face skin, and transmits over to brain information on tongueuage and cheeks movements, and other related feelings. If I was correctly informed, the injuries of this nerve happen at strokes and brain injuries, which exactly completes the proof.


8-th nerve: it is an auditory (acoustical) nerve which is also "responsible" for the vestibular apparatus, i.e. provides the balance and balance control. A small vascular "loop" from both sides near the intra cranial nerves 7-th and 8-th hardly could provoke the significant symptoms, and definitely was not connected in any way to the vertigo - though this abnormality in itself demanded further exams, and, probably, treatments.


A cyst in the left near maxillary sinus. A cyst, even the tiniest, in the bottom of the nasal bosom: it is rather a serious problem since the walls of the nasal bosoms remind the cheese with a set of the openings in turn penetrated by the vessels, lymphatic outflows, nerves, shoots of the connective tissue which quite often turn into the ways of the penetrating infections, suppurations, toxic substances (etc.) in the internal space of the skull and brain, and in the eye-sockets. Cysts quite often inflame, causing inflammations. The cyst in such a place is especially dangerous to an eye and an optical nerve: therefore my left eye was (since this cyst"s development) under the continuous threat. The risk for the left eye was strengthened by the vascular "loops" found near the 7-th and 8-th nerves. Now - is the main question: whether these pathological changes, or some of them appeared as the consequences of the trauma (inflicted by January 7, 2013 events)? And whether others were: a consequence of a similar event on November 3, 2005? (Thus it is necessary to emphasize that these pathologies (as separately, and in a complex) cannot fully explain (and provoke) by themselves what has happened on January 7, 2013).


And, as the 2-nd and the 3-rd similar cases (on January 7, 2013, and on June 21, 2016) with the similar symptoms are connected to the medical sabotage and cover up operations during my visits to St.-Mary"s Emergency Room, it is possible to assume that someone knew what exactly (actually) happened, and that the utmost was done to assure that nobody will ever learn anything about it.


Due to the findings - it was logical to refer me, at least, to an otolaryngologist and ophthalmologist, under their continuous supervision, but nothing has been undertaken. If not the inaction of the medical workers, then, maybe, it was still possible to prevent the serious problems with my vision and hearing.


But I do not want to blame ALL medical doctors or the WHOLE SYSTEM. I am sure that my family doctor has not reacted in any way to MRI report just because 1) in the situation of the aggressively expanding privatization (of the health care) and the reduction of the resources for public sector doctors have ceased not only the prophylactic procedures, but in general have stopped to treat the diseases, only their symptoms and complications; 2) the radiologist"s disputable conclusion ("nothing significant") has tied doctor"s hands; and 3) he could not afford a confrontation with St.-Mary's hospital (from where they kicked me out home with 13 thousands leukocytes, suspected micro-stroke, and with a number of other potentially dangerous symptoms and deviations, telling me nothing about the high (13.000) leucocytes and without having appointed a repeated blood test, and refusing to perform the head"s computer tomography).


No one of my family doctor"s patients would be mistreated in the Emergency Room in a similar way, only I alone, and my family doctor perfectly knew, why. And the main issue here is not that he has treated me in this and in other similar cases "worse" or "better" than other patients. A moral dilemma which he faced, I repeat, was represented by the fact that nothing similar could happen to his other patients. Probably, only the insiders (medical workers), who know all medical "codes" and written / unwritten laws and rules - can judge fully how he has solved this moral dilemma. But there is also a universal moral criteria, and one of its components - the personal conscience. And I am not sure what exactly this internal judge will prompt to him.


(As was already noticed above - in December, 2012, - the foot bones and the lowest outstanding tibia bones of the ankles (above a foot) from the outer side suddenly began to hurt. By January the 2013 the pain suddenly (and inexplicably) disappeared).


On January 21, 2013, something happened to my eyes: it became difficult to read or write. It was not possible to concentrate the view on any text. In 2 weeks the normal ability of working on the computer, to deal with the texts - was restored. There is no doubt that it was a direct impact of the inexplicable occurrence on January 7, 2013, and the sabotage of the medical help in ER. My panic, my almost hysterical letters to friends and relatives apropos the "accidents" with the vision - an emotional label of that period. Since 22 Jan. 2013: ulcers in the mouth (since November, 2012, appearing with the frequency in a month - two). For the first time this misfortune has materialized in January, 2001, and was obviously connected to the "initial" infection (the urological infection: see the Book 1-2). By 2004 this illness has left, but now has shown itself again - after a long break. And since 2001 (when this for the first time "has became systemic"): no diagnosis...


Since 27 Jan. 2013 the situation became so bad that it seemed like the ulcerous infection has "eaten" the hard palate almost to the bone... On January 27, since the late evening, and through the early morning next day (even before 4 a.m. - when I was going to go to hospital) - suddenly my whole face began to burn. The skin took the colors of a poppy, like a burn of the 1-st degree. Only by the evening it slightly felt better.


CHAPTER 3


On January 28, 2013, I waited in ER from 4 a.m. to 15:00 - and was refused the exam in a pointed manner. Everyone, who came 5-6 (and more) hours later, was very soon called to a doctor (regardless of the seriousness of the problem); even those who used to come with cold, trifling scratches, sprain.


On the same day (on January 28, 2013) it was possible to get an appointment in the policlinic that works 7 days per week from 8 a.m. to 18:00. I received a course of antibiotics. It helped right away, and very soon the situation has become much better. But the causative agent of the infection is not known again. My request for a swab test was refused again. On January 29, 2013, I had an appointment with the rheumatologist, doctor Yiri (Yury) Krasny. On my request, Doctor Krasny has ordered an MRI of the left foot.


Here is the report of the MRI-Scan:


CONSULTATION EN RADIOLOGIE DIAGNOSTIQUE


Date d'examen (s) :


16/10/2013 No requête : -----------


Les insertions des tendons du poplité bref et long, l'insertion et trajet tibial postérieur, tendon du long fléchisseur des orteils et tendon du fléchisseur de l'hallux sont sans particularité.

L'arche plantaire est normale sous réserve d'une étude qui a été obtenue sans mise en charge.


Opinion :


Hypersignal de la surface cutanée et les tissus mous sous-cutanés sur le versant externe du mi-pied en regard des 4e et 5e rayons centrés au niveau des métatarses, non spécifique, qui serait à confronter à la clinique.


Un petit épanchement articulaire métatarsophalagnien du 1er rayon confronté à un bilan d'acide urique.


Signé sans être relu (...)


[All supported documents, details and materials are given in the book The Rheumatology Uncovered.]


[the confidential data was masked]


This test has found the presence of not very significant pathological changes typical for the salts adjournment. So, it is natural to assume the same process behind other joints-bones problems arising throughout a row of years since 2001. If I correctly interpreted the explanation of one of my correspondents (he is a doctor-rheumatologist from Belgium (we corresponded in French, but English medical terminology is more familiar to me), they are very similar to salt-accumulation cases and some particular cases of the Reuters syndrome. It is possible to assume also that the pathological changes in the examined area could become more significant, but - after the decrease of a hyper-lithemia level, or (if it was the Reuters syndrome) at the change of some conditions - the deposits of the crystallization or something similar: have been decreased. On the other hand, the feature of this particular joint is such that even a tiny bone callosity, a "stone" formed by calcification, or a tiny "fragment" of a bone can cause an intolerable pain:


[the visual sample is skipped in this book]


If now we attribute the same conclusion to ALL pathological joints" changes found by all previous tests, and to all further dramas of the sharp arthritis attacks (which have additionally destroyed my life and my professional activity (as a musician (pianist of a high level) I was affected more severely than other people): first of all, it is abundantly clear that this diagnosis could materialize itself years earlier, and, secondly, it was possible - with its help - to prevent a lot of problems, and, in particular, what have happened in next 2 years.


Doctor Yiri Krasny has repeatedly said with an authoritative and mentor tone that no calcification is present in me, and also excluded the Reuters syndrome, but it is possible that he just bluffed. If doctor Yury Krasny has let me know that the MRI"s rapport was ready, as he promised, or (when he did not do it) if this report would be accessible to me in 2013 or (at least) at the beginning of 2014, I could apply the natural analogues of Allopurinal, etc. But, like in tens of other cases, just another doctor has reported NOTHING to me about the test"s findings, did not appoint a rendezvous, a treatment, or follow ups. So, the doctors not only systematically concealed the tests" results from me (including the urological infections, which is an urgency!), but, on the contrary, have "classified" the tests" rapports.


If I nevertheless used to obtain the rapport, they misinformed me, reducing a serious problem to a foolish "sore": 1) liver problems which required a treatment, and also the essential deviations of the liver function indicators in the routine tests; 2) tests" results revealing the urological infections which should be treated (prescription of antibiotics, etc.) immediately; 3) a temporary dysfunction (let even insignificant) of the thyroid gland, which should be treated; 4) obvious symptoms of a gastroenterological virus, which should be treated; 5) other gastroenterological problems (systematic diarrhea or constipation, internal varicose, etc.), which should be treated; 6) the dermatitis with ulcerations (accompanied by the exposure to real torture [intolerable itching and burning; bright redness; wet skin; blood vessels" damage]) related to the gastroenterological virus (which detection was sabotaged for years by both doctors, and laboratories, and because of which I could not sit normally for days, weeks, or months (only to stand or lie on one side, not on the back) - which required a treatment; 7) the beginning of the pre-diabetes which should be also treated; 8) the arthritis which touched and has affected all bone system which should be treated; 9) mutation of the transitional cells (revealed in 2004, and then - repeatedly - twice in the 2010-s); 10) high leucocytes (and other deviations (blood test) from the norm after the strongest vertigo), which should be observed, at least; 11) several dangerous vessels" injuries (for example, when I was hit by a car), which could lead to amputation or even death, and which treatment sabotage was, possibly, related to a cover-up and framing the car driver; 12) thrombocytopenia and other deviations from the norm; 13) cardiovascular problems which should be treated; 14) and a number of other medical emergencies, which were consequences of other uncured problems and which too should be treated. Since 2007 (when I was first time hit by car) I was systematically denied the lower limbs Doppler-Duplex ultrasound scan.


At the same time, since 2001, ALL doctors - whom I visited - for years refused to me (for unclear reasons) the tests to identify or to exclude a) the Reuters syndrome; b) the urological pathologies (MRI, CT-scanm etc.); c) the gastroenterological virus (an endoscopy test, done in the Royal Victoria hospital on the order of Doctor Szego, just disappeared, and further endoscopy tests were never performed, in spite of Doctor Szego"s requisites).


Only in 2011 one familiar cardiologist from Dagestan, who himself consulted another specialist, has suggested (according to my description of symptoms) the Reuters syndrome, or 2 other eventual possibilities (one of which later was confirmed by the tests). But since 2001, without knowing the precise names for these illnesses, I was, nevertheless, actually naming them to doctors - verbally and in the written messages (sometimes sent by the faxes which copies have remained) - coming out with an assumption about the connection to the urological infection of 2001: 1) conjunctivitis (since 2001) and teary eyes, especially on the wind and at low temperatures; 2) arthritis (since 2001); 3) uretritis; 4) skin and mucous inflammations, infections, etc.; 5) reddening and posterization of both feet heels; 6) hot to the touch joints during the arthritis attacks.


The extra-class doctors (recognized medical authorities and experts with an undisputable reputation) - whom I visited - did not make any work to connect the combination of these (and other) symptoms (and tests" results) to a systemic disease like the Reuters syndrome or other similar complications of an urological infection. Thus, the doctors perfectly knew that the misfortune, which was destroying my health for years, reminds - most of all - the Reuters syndrome, or another complication from an urological infection, and - thus - not only did not pronounced the diagnosis, but even when (since 2011) I began to name the eventual diagnosis myself demanding the adequate tests (for identification and treatment of this misfortune), ALL doctors as one, for nearly 5 years, have refused the references urged to reveal such syndromes by the blood-urine tests, and did not refer me (as I demanded) to the special swab test. NO REASON, NO MEDICAL excuse (even if based on a mistake) could be for such a refusal, and, this means that the answer should be searched for outside of the medical area, in the sociopolitical plane.


But now "nous reviendrons à nos moutons": back to this history with the MRI (the left foot (29 Jan. 2013) on the order of Doctor Krasny.


In January, 2013, the hurting of knees, elbows, hips necks cartilages or bones (both sides), feet (stops), etc., returned. (Not at the same time, but "consecutively", one after one). I managed to book an appointment with the rheumatologist (Doctor Krasny), who (at my request) has referred me for MRI. I has registered myself for this procedure at first in one hospital (I sent a fax with the requisite); they promised to call in a month, and to give an exact date. 3 months passed; nobody called. The investigation has led to a discouraging discovery: the registration record "was not found in the system"! The same has repeated in the 2-nd and in the 3-rd hospital. In the 4-th hospital the procedure has been finally appointed to January 4, 2013. 5 days prior to the appointment they have called me to tell that the procedure was transferred to November. [And, finally, the MRI was scheduled to October 16, 2013.]


Up to May 8, 2015 - it appeared that the MRI result (the rapport), as well as all records about this particular MRI procedure (the left foot) ... were lost! When - on 17 December 2013 - I came to the doctor-rheumatologist, it has become clear that the official report with MRI"s results have never been delivered to the doctor, and nothing was found in the medical archive apropos this MRI!


In February, 2014, Doctor"s Ury Krasny (rheumatologist"s) secretary has told that the MRI"s rapport "has not arrived yet". [Again running forward: in 2015 the MRI"s report was [again] "not found". [See about that, and also how this rapport has suddenly "materialized" - in the further statement.]


In 2013-2014, Doctor Krasny"s secretaries have argued that never received the MRI-scan [Jean-Talon Hospital (October 16, 2013 (the left foot)]. I never managed to find this rapport in both Royal Victoria and Jean-Talon hospitals" archive. However - when later, in April, 2015, I have contacted the secretary of Dr. Krasny, she argued that she just saw the result of this MRI in my medical file, but has refused to provide a copy. Having come to the appointment with Dr. Krasny on April 21, 2015, I have found out that my whole former medical file (the chart) has disappeared, and does not exist any more. It has occurred during the period of Royal Victoria hospital"s closure, and of the temporarily placement of hospital"s clinics into another hospital - Montreal General Hospital, - while the new monstrous mega-hospital on Glenn, Decarie, and St.- Catharine streets was under construction (this construction project has continued the enormously huge operation of the demolition of European historical architectural heritage and the destruction of the unique architectural and environmental entity of Montreal.


So, during the beginning of this transitional period, my old file, together with all the tests" and exams" results, at first was safe and intact, and not gone anywhere, and was kept in the temporary secretariat registry of one of the temporary Royal Victoria" offices in the Montreal General Hospital. I saw this chubby file twice by my own eyes.


But on April 21, 2015, it did not exist any more (disappeared), and the secretary has created an absolutely new file on me, having filled the new form and having enclosed it in the new "medical" folder. Neither the secretary, nor the Doctor Krasny could answer my question where is my former medical file (the whole huge folder-volume). Let"s pay attention to the fact that the procedure of MRI has been passed on October 16, 2013, but its result (the rapport) seemed to be ready only in the middle of January, 2014 (or even later). I never heard that the reading of the MRI would take nearly 4 months! It is not surprising that I have not found it in the hospital"s archive on the 9 or 10 of January, 2014 (it simply was not yet ready by then). Judging by dates - it is quite possible that the secretaries of Doctor Ury (Yiri) Krasny did not deceive me, when stated in February, 2014, that the result of MRI has never was sent to them. Any sane person - on my place - would draw a conclusion that the official rapport was lost.


Nevertheless, when it became urgent, i.e. during the next attack of arthritis (since November 2014) in the end of May, 2015, I have decided to try the luck once again with the detection of this official report, and called about it to Doctor Krasny"s secretary (see above). But the office of Doctor Krasny had categorically blocked me an access to this MRI"s rapport.


Then I have decided to undertake a "last time" attempt of finding it in the hospital"s archive.


On May 8, 2015, in the morning, I made a trip to Jean-Talon hospital for the sake of the next attempt to obtain the MRI result, which was considered "missing" since 2013. On my way to the hospital it was a non-stop shadowing, with the participation of the "civil" (undercover) cars and the police cruisers. Judging by the facts and circumstances, I have outstripped the "operation" of closing to me the access to this MRI result somewhere for near only 5 minutes, and if used the Metro to go there: would not to see it as my own ears. If I would come 5-6 minutes later: I would not find this MRI in the archive.


It has become clear that else in the 2013 the MRI has revealed the salts adjournment, and it means that the further joints" degradation could be prevented. It turns out that the doctors and medical institutions have hid from this rapport from me during the whole 2 years, and this has led to all sad consequences. Thus, the diagnostics and treatment sabotage and the deliberate damage to my health were once again documented.


In connection with the strange circumstances of this MRI of the l. feet (stop), and the vitreous body detachment (in the left eye), "combined" by date with this procedure, it is essential to return to these events (October, 2013) further.


Since December, 2012, there emerged the folliculites rash with the frequency of 3-4 weeks (for the first time it appeared in 1992, in a country with the hot climate, as well as a hypertension; but with the coming to Montreal, apparently, has completely disappeared, recurring in 2001 (and, probably, provoked by the urological infection). It was not purulent, but the itching was intolerable. It was absolutely impossible to obtain an appointment with the dermatologist during this period.


The abscesses in the ears and in the nose; pain - for an unknown reasons - in the throat (microbiology, ultrasonography, etc. - did not revealed "any pathology"), intolerable pain in the ligaments and feet (at a total absence of the rheumatic arthritis" indication in the blood-urine tests and bones deformations): here it is a far incomplete list.


It has to be added to this list (it is far not to the full!) of the longer indispositions the short-term, every day arising and then FOREVER gone TEMPORARY health problems as though someone was guiding me for a trip on all letters and paragraphs of the medical encyclopedia "from above".


Various exams and tests, which I "beat out" with fight from the medical workers (ultrasonography, MRI, the microbiology urine tests, cytology, even the cystoscopy), and 2 courses of antibiotics: everything was ineffectual.


Since 2003: the constant problems with the bones and joints; the x-rays at first confirmed some pathological changes (deformations), but at the repeated x-rays procedures did not find anything (everything "has resolved" by itself?!) : and, as a result - not even a single diagnosis.


Crystallization and the deposits (tofi, sophits?) are found at the salts adjournment, and, happens, at the fall of uric acid"s concentration disappear. If this is my case: why the doctors have never prescribed the allopurinal, did not give any diet recommendations, and have not produced any diagnosis? What is the matter? If this is the salts adjournment: why not to do the differentiation of crystallization and calcification (2 versions of the salts adjournment: gout and "pseudo"-gout)? If this is NOT the salts adjournment: why not to refer to the tests and exams on identification of other types of arthritis, including the Reuters syndrome? The bone density scan was also never done (my requests were always denied). After all, as to the Reuters syndrome: the tests are very cheap and simple, and there is no reason to refuse them.


In January - a rather deep cut on a the palm (after awakening). The most logical explanation is an unknown infection (it is probable, a rare skin"s damage leaving a trace LIKE a scar (because any other explanation goes into a non-lucid, irrational, esoteric direction). This hardly appreciable fresh scar went like a strip: as if something thin have injured the skin - and there was a very narrow, but a deep and painful wound. I vainly begged the doctors to do an urgent check for an infection. They listened nothing. They have gone in cycles, arguing that it I, say, was cut by a razor. I in vain explained that I have no razor.


I repeat that in January, 2013, the strong pain has started over to hurt again the knees, elbows, cartilages or bones of the hip"s neck from both sides, feet, etc.. (Not at the same time, but "consecutively"). I managed to get an appointment with the rheumatologist (Doctor Krasny), who referred me for left foot"s MRI. I already gave a report about the "Odyssey" of its rapport and I"ll adjust more details below.


The result of the blood test on the "rheumatic factor" and the "Reuters syndrome" (that was made in the Royal Victoria hospital, and repeated in the Montreal General Hospital "was not found". Later, doing a complete audit of the medical documents of my personal archive and looking through the requisites of doctor Krasny, I have found that exactly requisite, in which it has not been specified any, connected with the Reuters syndrome checkmarks. It means that Doctor Krasny, declaring to me that he sends me for a blood test for the rheumatoid factor, S-reactine, etc., and "the Reuters syndrome", actually misinformed me (to put it mildly), or, during our conversation, has forgotten to check in the requisite the corresponding points.


At first (already in the 4-th hospital where I registered in turn) - the MRI procedure has been appointed to January 4, 2013. In 5 days prior to this date they have called me from there just to tell that the MRI was rescheduled for November. And, finally, MRI was appointed to October 16, 2013.


2013 became the most depressing, most tragic year before 2016-2017 (even more dramatic for me period, which was almost completely provoked by the events in 2013), when the health problems have fell down as an avalanche. The satanic cults confer the digit "13" a special supernatural value, and many of the opponents of the satanic cults were poisoned, killed, attacked, or persecuted at the dates connected with 13.


Now we will return to the consecutive chronology, i.e. by the beginning of 2013.


CHAPTER 4


FEBRUARY, 2013.


On February 23, 2013 I bought a bicycle in one of Costco"s network shops. A person of approximately 46 years old and in a red jacket uniform of the shop has approached me and has suddenly photographed me together with the bicycle. When I have asked the shop"s employer, who was preparing this bicycle for me, who is the worker that photographed me, he said that the "photographer" does not work in Costco, and just comes "to buy in such a look". But in that case he should be immediately stopped by shop"s security for violating the regulations!


It was obvious that the worker is hiding something, avoiding to speak about something else, which was felt in his intonation.


The Question: to whom serve and to whom belong, and by whom maintained Costco"s powerful video cameras? It is possible that the photography was also used to distract my attention while the employee might attach the tracing-watching device on that bicycle.


When on Tuesday, February 26, 2013, at 23.18., I have left on my first trip on this new bicycle, I was intercepted by the police cruiser 15-11. It happened in the southern part of the deadlock streets behind the Wellington Street. While going there, I have not noticed the shadowing. On my way, I did not meet any person or a car. The police car 15-11 was noticed by me in the far prospect (through many streets) from the opposite side of Wellington, and I have turned into a network of zigzag small streets. The police patrol not only has gone to catch me up, but has repeated all my numerous maneuvers (turns and turns).


When I have gone on a very narrow path through a deserted and extensive snow-covered park near the stadium, the police car has turned on the same NARROW(!) PEDESTRIAN path, and, rolling in the snow (it could and get stuck!) has rushed after me. It was very scary and frightening.


There are no video cameras on streets, which I passed. I have no mobile phone, a GPS device, or an electronic card, or a strip with the RFID. Moreover, up to the moment of police"s emergence at the corner of Wellington, nobody went after me. Who and how have calculated my site? Was a RFID device installed on the bicycle?


However, it is not the end of the story. Having left on the second bicycle trip, I have found out that the bicycle "does not go properly". It has appeared that it was deliberately broken in a cunning way (the back plug). Thus, everything appears extremely accurately. Possibly, I was "permitted" to receive only an absolutely certain bicycle. By the time of the purchase there were only 3 bicycles. I have chosen one, and the wife has called the worker who has declared that the exemplar chosen by me is "defective", and has brought to me an alternative one. So, it was not me, but the shop"s worker who have actually chosen the bicycle, and then suspiciously long pottered (tightened up brake shoes) with it, and at this time other person in the Costco"s shop uniform (probably, a policeman in the civilian close) photographed me.


This act of sabotage has deprived me of a bicycle (it was possible to return it to Costco only within a month, but - because of snow - I did not use it for a long time, and only the 2-nd trip has shown the problem). I describe this event in this chronicle just because to stay without the bike was another blow to my health (as when my previous bike was taken from my by force, and, as I suspect, not without the police"s involvement).


MARCH, 2013.


2 days our phone did not work.


APRIL, 2013.


Dodge of the same model as the police car 70-47 (it is the road-traffic police, which stops and fine drivers for traffic violations) began to "cut" me often in central points. Meanwhile the police car 70-47 has drawn my attention on August 25, 2010 (approximately at 16.07; corner of Peel and Rene-Levesque); on April 7, 2013 (08.24, entrance on the Decarie Autoroute); on the same day in the evening.


MAY, 2013.


On 20 May 2013, I went out for a walk at 6 a.m., and when I passed through the narrow alley between two houses, a motorcyclist has jumped out towards me. This freak would beet me down if not my reaction. I will not begin to describe, how I have evaded an impact. The reader hardly can imagine it. In that moment my head hardly thought, everything have worked only on the reflexes. On my happiness, there was no 2-nd attempt. Then I have fleeced the skin on 2 fingers, and have slightly stretched the ligaments (fortunately, I have got off only with it).


The HPV (virus) has lodged on one of the scratched fingers: approximately since May 22, 2013 - a strange "warty" consolidation on the middle finger of the right hand. (At first a small speck) was outlined.


(At the end of September, 2013, trying to find out a source of physical discomfort and painful(unhealthy) feelings, has found out that has counted as an internal condyloma). I managed to book an emergency appointment with the gastroenterologist for October 22, 2013.


But before, on October 16, 2013, I had the MRI procedure in Jean-Talon hospital.


On the same day, in the evening, I have noticed that in the left eye"s visual field something terry appeared, or "floating objects", or such transparent "eyelashes" - especially well visible on a white background. All my attempts to book an appointment with an ophthalmologist (or an oculist; optometrist) were not crowned by success. I have thought at once that something happened with my left eye in connection with the MRI procedure.


I did not go to Emergency Room yet, having judged that they will refuse again to provide any help for me. All I could do is to wait for more appalling symptoms to receive such help.


[Running forward: in 2015 the MRI"s rapport (result) "has not been found". [As I already explained, much later it had suddenly "materialized".] (Irrespectively conclusions or suspicions: the MRI was done for the LEFT foot, and the eye that has been injured was the LEFT, too.).


On the same day (on October 16, 2013), later in the evening, I have noticed more transparent floating points, lines and zigzags in the left eye. To book an appointment in a private oculist"s office (the ophthalmological services in Canada are only partially covered by the state medical program) was not my socio-economic level, and for a free, state-covered appointment with an ophthalmologist people can wait 1-2 years, or more.


Within the mentioned 10 months - 2012 - 2013 - I received a bold medics" refusal on the following requests:


..... I. Rash, chronic inflammation, and other skin pathologies: my requests for microbiological / virology tests, prescription of antibiotics and hormonal ointments - all were refused.

...... II. Acute, severe bones / joints pain, which tormented me 6 months and then vanished "by itself"; all my requests were refused: CT-scan and the ultrasonic joints scan, X-ray of some bones, bones density test, Reuters Syndrome, on a rheumatoid factor, the prescription of anti-inflammatory medication, etc. And the MRI rapport was sabotaged nearly a year and twice postponed. (I do not mention that I got an access to its result (rapport) only in May, 2015!).

...... III. Probable sudden and difficult explainable suddenness colitis: all test requested by me: denied.

...... IV. Difficult explainable (temporal) problems with the vision-sight: all exams and treatment - refused

...... V. An extraordinary aggressive and long-duration infection in the oral cavity: the antibiotics were prescribed only after a long period of the failure of all other medical remedies. The tests for the nature of infection, and swab test - refused.

...... VI. Herpes (mysteriously appearing (no herpes contacts): an ointment was prescribed, but only after several times of complete ignoring of my problem.

...... VII. Abscesses in both ears and the nose: exams and treatment were completely refused.

...... VIII. An epic of the warty neoplasm: the treatment was refused; I had to remove it myself in a "surgical" way.

...... XIX. Intestinal, nasal and renal (?... presumably) bleedings: completely ignored in Emergency Rooms, walk-in clinics, and by the doctors working in their private offices; text, exams and treatment - refused.

...... X. Twice repeated problems with receiving the blood-pressure controlling pills in time.

...... XI. Strange injuries of skin (like cuts) noticed at the moment of the morning awakening: were boldly ignored.

It is not a complete list of medical refusals.


So, as I already describes above, on October 16, 2013, I did the MRI scan in the Jean-Talon hospital. I was surprised that - after MRI - they took me to another room, and performed an X-ray of the l. foot. I did an attempt to refuse, but the secretary and the radiologist - both of these women - said that if I do not undergo - in addition to MRI - the X-ray: it will be impossible to proceed the result of MRI scan. But Doctor Krasny, who referred me to MRI - as an alternative to X-ray exam (when I said that "I do not want to be irradiated with an X-ray") - did not warn me about the X-Ray, and, thus, clearly sent me for MRI because I did not want to do the X-Ray. So, the question is: really a specialist doctor did not know that, in addition to MRI, it is necessary to do also an X-ray? Or it was a kind of an improvisation by the hospital"s staff? I read that doctor Krasny was obliged to explain to me that X-ray - for comparing - is all the same necessary.


The date for MRI was twice transferred (changed); instead of the left foot - in hospital"s documents appeared "right"; and, except of MRI, they unexpectedly did also an X-ray without warning me in advance. Plus, the rapport of this MRI later has disappeared for a long period of time!


When on December 17, 2013, I visited the rheumatologist, it was clarified that the medical rapport did not arrive to the doctor, and in the medical archive it was not known!


In February, 2014 Doctor"s Ury Krasny secretary told that the result of MRI (the rapport) "did not arrive yet".


[Running forward: in 2015 - the result of MRI was "not found".]


I repeat again that after the MRI procedure (16 Oct. 2013), which was done for the LEFT foot, my LEFT eye was damaged. On the same day (on October 16, 2013), by the evening, several transparent floating points, lines and zigzags appeared in the left eye. I could not get an appointment with a private oculist (the services of ophthalmologists are only partially covered by the state medical program in Canada), and for free exam one may wait for years.


At night of October 22, 2013, flashouts appeared in the left eye in response to the head turning: the head left-to the right: the red flashouts were displayed correspondently at the left and right half-circles of the eye-socket circuit; up-down: top and bottom boundaries.


At the same day - for October 22 - were scheduled the appointments with doctors and for the tests, for which I waited many months, and I had no time to glance into the medical reference manuals.


Among 3 doctors whom I visited on October 22, 2013 (police - as usually [during this period] "escorted" me to the entrance door of all 3 medical institutions), there was also a gastroenterologist. This was one of few reliable doctors, who could be trusted. To my misfortune, he has begun the conversation from reminding that "only" around a year ago I supposedly passed a colonoscopy (ordered at my personal request) - and nothing significant was found by then, so, now nothing significant "can be there". I tried to stress that "anything" can appear in a year and a half, but he turned to this a deaf ear. When vocalized my suspicion that it might be an internal condyloma, he made fun of it, and said what I probably do not know, what is it.


After the in-office exam he claimed that my suggestion was wrong.


Later my self-diagnosis was confirmed by another specialist (an infectionist), and, after a course of antibiotics, the neoplasm was gone. I even have an official document with this diagnosis. (See: Book 7, Soviet-style Silencing the Dissidents by a Mental-Health Defamation). However, before this diagnosis was confirmed, I was insulted by several doctors, one of whom even said that supposedly the "alleged condyloma" is my "psychological problem", and called it "morbid depression".


As well as in many other cases, my self-diagnosis received a documentary proof later, which once again emphasized the criminal behavior (insinuations) of those doctors who frankly exploited a bold explanation method by reducing the real somatic pathologies to the "mentality of the patient".


On the other hand, the gastroenterologist was telling about disturbing urological problems, which needed an urgent attention. He told me that "if even" my self-diagnosis concerning the gastroenterology was correct, these urological problems are more worrying, and signed a referral for an urologist, which I took (on Dr. Szego"s order) to the central secretariat of the gastroenterological department of the new Royal Victoria"s hospital (at the Glen site), and she - in my presence - called the Urology and sent this referral there by fax. (Running forward: nobody ever called from there).


Running forward, it should be noted that 3 weeks later PSA test showed a "super-normal" result: slightly more than 1; and the ultrasound scan for the same purpose has shown a significant shrinking, not an enlargement of the same organ (in comparison with the previous tests). My suggestions that the enlargements and decreases were happening because of the innumerous infections and abscesses, which were the product of the denial of antibiotics and other treatment and tests, and triggered a calcification process: appeared to be true, and the guilt of Dr. Morris was confirmed later. More details will be given in the Book 5 (1, 2, 3) - Urological Drama.


As for the left eye, only in the evening, October 22, 2013, I picked up a massive Encyclopedia of Symptoms, and read in it that these symptoms are related only to an eye, and to nothing else. These symptoms are signaling about the vitreous body destruction, or (what is completely ominous): about the retina"s detachment.


Same night (to be more precise, at daybreak, on October 23, 2013) I went to St.-Mary"s Emergency Room.


Only at 12:30, October 23, 2013, I was examined by an alleged ophthalmologist [see below an incredible story of how a family doctor impersonated an ophthalmologist], and the vitreous body destruction was confirmed. If it would be retina"s detachment; after so many hours of waiting, there would be the irreversible changes, and I would lose an eye.


All symptoms are reflected in the records of the triage nurse, and it is marked there (from my words) that the flashouts and spots began to appear in the left eye since October 16, 2013.


In the final diagnosis, which was signed by Dr. John Robert Lewis (why not by Dr. Basmadjian, the ophthalmologist?), is told: the vitreous body destruction, but either date, or time, or doctor"s license number (apart from the data that was inscribed in the document heading automatically) are missing.


The intraocular pressure was measured only after my persistent demands. Doctor said to me that the intraocular pressure is "20" and that it is "an excellent pressure", which is within the norm. But actually such an intraocular pressure: is alarmingly on the boundary of the norm, and testifying about a closed-angle syndrome without glaucoma or with glaucoma, or an open angle glaucoma, or signifying about other dangerous pathologies. In one of the printouts, the IOP (intraocular pressure) was mentioned at St.-Mary"s Eye Clinic was mentioned as 25. Despite this index, despite the vitreous destruction, they did not assign any treatment to me, did not prescribe any eye-drops, did not put me under ophthalmologist"s observation and under the ophthalmological care, and did not plan any follow-ups. No cataract was found by then.


Therefore, I went to a private French eye clinic, but the same happened there, too. The borderline IOP was ignored, the retinal detachment was ignored, but the cataract was not detected.


No medical measures were undertaken; no eye drops or another treatment - was assigned in both of the clinics.


No additional examinations were performed.


I also demanded to check whether there is no cataract. Doctor said that he checked it out and that supposedly there is no cataract. But later it became clear to me that he did not do any inspection by means of the slot lamp, and probably did not check whether there is a cataract.


Before Dr. John R. Lewis (or it was another doctor), I was examined by a woman, who said that she is the "doctor"s assistant". Having some unpleasant feelings about the integrity of the procedures and about this assistant and her chef, I have asked her if she meant that she"s acting here as an assistant of an ophthalmologist, to which she responded "yes". Not the doctor, but this lady has checked my visual acuity and performed some other tests. It is not possible to find out who she was and what she was doing. I had an impression that she could be an ophthalmological nurse, not an assistant or an optometrist.


[When - much later - I managed to obtain the copies of the examination documents from the medical archive, there was marked only the visual acuity test and the inspection of the retina (the eye bottom). There is no word about the intraocular pressure.]


My demands to order the follow-ups and to register me in this St.-Mary"s ophthalmological clinic as a permanent patient: were cynically ignored.


I was just thrown out to the street, they just kicked me out.


As for everything that happened BEFORE and DURING the exam by the "ophthalmologist": there are "miracles" alone.


A breast card of the Emergency Room doctor, who was seeing me at St.-Mary"s hospital, has displayed the name of Dr. Deborah Silberberg, or Deborah Feinstein (Dr. Debra Silberberg-Finestone), but I also knew this woman (this doctor) as Doctor Chrissie Paraskevopoulos. I have no ideas, who needed this masquerade and why, but I am absolutely sure that on October 5, 2007 (my visit to "ER" when I was hit by car), and on October 23, 2013 (the vitreous body destruction (detachment), and in March, 2014 (the fracture of a right foot"s toe) - I was examined by the same doctor known to me as Chrissie Paraskevopulos, but in the papers - assigned to my file (in the official rapports) - there appeared 3 different names, attributed to her exams, and no name of Doctor Paraskevopulos was ever mentioned.


On October 5, 2007, I was, allegedly, examined by Dr. Krishna (while in the ultrasound"s requisite paper was mentioned the name of Dr. C. Paraskevopoulos, who referred me to this exam); on October 23, 2013, I was, allegedly, examined by doctor Finosteno, and that was, allegedly, at 13:30, whereas actually I was seen by Dr. Chrissie Paraskevopulos approximately at 10.20, before being assessed by Dr. Basmadjian (the ophthalmologist) (whom I took first for John R. Lewis). Not Dr. Chrissie Paraskevopoulos, or Dr. Finosteno, or Dr. Basmadjian singed the final diagnostics report, but Dr. John Robert Lewis, completely unknown to me, who did not see me, and did not assessed me at all. In the same rapport, which mentioned Dr. Finosteno, was also mentioned (under a hypertrophied question mark, which reflects a bold and outraged mistrust) my self-diagnosis "vitreous body detachment". However, the "vitreous body detachment" was not entered into the "diagnosis" field, but written under, while in the "diagnosis" field is mentioned only "floaters" and "flashouts" in the l. eye (since 16 Oct. 2013).


On my description of symptoms and assumption that it can be retinal detachment or vitreous body destruction, the doctor has replied that, supposedly, there is "nothing terrible" - if a "veil", or, so to speak, "coulisse" (a black-colour contour closing a vision segment) is not present. And, it means, said the doctor - it is not a retinal detachment, and, allegedly, no urgency of an exam by an ophthalmologist.


I have argued that at the initial stages of the retina"s and the vitreous body detachment the symptoms are absolutely similar (they coincide (the same), and that at the stage of the "coulisse" it becomes already problematic to rescue the retina, which salvation becomes by then too difficult or even impossible. Therefore, I have emphasized, by refusing a referral for an assessment (an exam) by an ophthalmologist, she"s forcing me to address to another hospital"s Emergency Room, and she bears the whole responsibility for the consequences. Only by then, Dr. Paraskevopoulos-Silberberg-Feintein-Finosteno "has condescended" a referral to an ophthalmologist. (See the image above).


Judging by the papers, which I received from the medical archive, it was possible to assume that I was not seen by an ophthalmologist, but by a doctor-imposter, who impersonated a specialist-ophthalmologist while being simply a family doctor.

Whoever was the doctor, who examined my eyes on 23 Oct. 2013, he did not warn me that I should call someone to accompany me back home after dilation, and, with the blurry vision, I could be hit by car on my way home, and could have any kind of an accident. After the retinal exam, performed by this doctor, I could not see normally for more then 4 days (my vision was blurry all 4 days), and the vision deterioration has stayed permanently. Thus, this doctor did an irreversible damage to my eyes.

This doctor and his colleagues - by their actions (some mistakes during the dilation, as well as by refusing to issue the follow-ups), - provoked glaucoma, optical nerve damage, cataract, and other eyes" disastrous conditions in me.


[As almost all other medical practitioners, whose ethical code is disturbingly dubious, Dr. Basmadjian was also involved in business affairs. He owned, as minimum, 3 enterprises: 1. G. Basmadjian, Arto-pharmacie, 3550 Chemin Cote-des-Neiges; 2. Dr. Basmadjian, Girair, Ophtalmologue; Clinique médicale Bélanger, 3871 rue Bélanger E, Montréal QC H1X 3M7, Canada, Téléphone : 514-725-5996; 3. 5601, rue Bélanger E., Montréal, QC H1T 1G3, Téléphone : 514-256-6000. He was also listed among the dentists: Dr. Girair Basmadjian, Dentist; 5885 Chemin Cote-des-Neiges, 3550 Chemin Cote-des-Neiges. (Another person with the same - identical! - name (a rare name!)?) Almost impossible.

Besides, he was also listed among the optometrists in Montreal. It could be understandable that there no Dr. Girar (or Girair) Basmadjian"s photos online: not even 1. Who knows, maybe, he has such a repellent appearance that he destroyed all his personal photos. And, still, it is very suspicious and disturbing. But much more disturbing is that there is no information on him at all at Internet, as if he did not exist at all. It is impossible to find out where he studied, where he worked before St.-Mary"s, what is his academic status, etc., as if he"s hiding something. He is only listed among the medical workers by the Collège des médecins du Québec (CMQ): Statut dans le Collège des médecins du Québec - Numéro de permis : 71089 - Statut : Inscrit. There were very mixed patients" opinions about Dr. Basmadjian: some positive and extremely negative. For example, in 2017 one of his patients wrote: "Dr. Basmadjian is the worst doctor ive ever seen! Him and his secretaries are unprofessional, they are either never there or redirecting the phone call. Ive had a stye for 1 year now and he did two surgeries and both of them failed! Truly the most unorganised, unprofessional, careless doctor ive ever seen."

It became clear (from the posts) that he is a very narrow specialist of retina treatment, and his patients with the retinal problems were satisfied. However, the patients with glaucoma, cataract, vitreous detachment, and other pathologies - reported that he is the most incompetent, indifferent, inhuman, and inactive doctor. Was I directed to him because he is a specialist on retina, or because he is a specialist for punishing people like me?

And, still, it is possible that not Dr. Basmadjian assessed me on 23 Oct. 2013, because there were innumerous examples, when one doctor examined me at St.-Mary"s ER or in this hospital"s clinics, but in the official documents, they put the name of another doctor. I used to revive a description of Dr. Basmadjian"s physical appearance from 2 of his former patients, and I am not sure that they match the man, who was examining me on 23 Oct. 2013.]


In the official rapport of the ophthalmologic clinic at St-Mary's hospital to the Emergency Room (of the same hospital) is specified that I was sent to the clinic by doctor Finosteno; however, there is no official rapport of doctor Finosteno herself (or himself) in medical archive, nor such a doctor has never examined me on October 23, 2013. (See again (above) a fragment of already mentioned official page).


When I asked Dr. Basmadjian about the follow ups and about becoming his permanent patient, or to be registered as a patient of St.-Mary"s hospital"s ophthalmology clinic, he said that I need a referral for that. However, I already had a referral (from the same hospital"s ER), and, besides, a vitreous body detachment and the glaucoma or pre-glaucoma condition is an indication for putting a patient under a permanent medical observation (supervision). I turned to the secretary of this clinic with the same question, and she said that I have to ask Dr. John R. Lewis. Vicious Circle.


As soon as I could see (because, after the retinal exam I could not see 4 days), my first attempt was to find the doctor, who examined my vision, and to ask him about what happened to my eyes. However, the medical archive has sabotaged my access to ER and to the Ophthalmological Clinis"s documents, and could obtain some of the medical rapports only 2 years later.


St.-Mary"s Hospital"s Ophthalmology clinic"s visit card, taken in this department on 23 October 2013. (Above)


Triage document (see above).


Dr. Lewis, mentioned in this document, never examined me; I never met him. Why the secretary of St.-Mary"s ophthalmology department said that for follow-ups I must ask not Dr. Basmadjian, but Dr. Lewis?


My first intention was to see Dr. Lewis, and to ask him, what happened. However, to my astonishment, I could not find Dr. John R. Lewis among Montreal"s ophthalmologists, and have discovered that he is a family doctor working in St.-Mary"s ER.


Like almost all other McGill University doctors, who were mentioned in connection with my troubles with the medical institutions and medics, Dr. Lewis (since 2006) had his own business: Dr. John Lewis Inc. Graphic. Address: 3846, Rue Wilson, Montréal, QC H4A 2T8. (Dr. Lewis - Founder and President. Around 50 shareholders). I also found out that Dr. John Robert Lewis was an Assistant Professor at Faculty of Medicine, McGill University.

4 or 5 years later I could read that Dr. John R. Lewis is an "emergency physician for 20 years with extensive teaching and curriculum development experience, notably in the area of bedside ultrasound interaction. At McGill, helped create and is now director of Canada"s first full undergraduate ultrasound education program; also created curriculum for postgraduate program in family medicine. ER staff at St Mary's Hospital, Montreal. Staff at GMF in Montreal. Co-director of MUSE ECHO, CME company providing Point-of-care ultrasound education to primary care clinicians: https://museecho.com/. Experience: McGill University Graphic; Assistant Professor in Family Medicine, McGill University. Weekly supervision of students & residents. Punctual lectures and small group sessions on a variety of topics. Coordinator of two courses, Fourth year Emergency Medicine and clerkship ultrasound course. Curriculum development at all levels from undergraduate to graduate and for practicing physicians; involvement in research on beside ultrasound education.


His medical career started in 1995 at Thunder Bay, Ontario, at Thunder Bay Regional Hospital"s ER. Probably, something went wrong there, because in 1998 (3 years later) Dr. Lewis started to work at Sioux Lookout Zone Hospital (Sioux Lookout, Ontario), as a Fly-in, Community physician for Fort Hope, Ontario Hawkesbury District and General Hospital. However, something went wrong (perhaps) there, too, because 2 years later, in 2000, he was already in Hawkesbury District and General Hospital (Ontario), working as a doctor in local ER. Since February 2002, he was working at St Mary's Hosptial"s ER. So, before St.-Mary"s Dr. Lewis changed 4 places, running from one hospital to another one. Why?


On his 4 or 5 photos, Dr. John Robert Lewis looked in 2014-2015 like a tall or middle-height sportive man, but the doctor, who examined me at St.-Mary"s ophthalmological clinic on 23 October 2013, was remembered to me as a short inconsistent man with a shapeless body. The authentic Dr. John Robert Lewis looked on his photos like a dolichocephalic man, but the doctor, who examined me at St.-Mary"s ophthalmological clinic on 23 October 2013, was remembered by me as a eurycephalic or a metriocephalic person with an ovoid head. The authentic Dr. John Robert Lewis did not wear any glasses on his photos, but the doctor, who examined me at St.-Mary"s ophthalmological clinic on 23 October 2013, had "serious" eyeglasses, in spite of his profession. Besides, he looked much older then could be Dr. John Robert Lewis in 2013-2015. An only similarity was that both looked as Middle Eastern people, or Sephardic Jews.

So, I inevitably concluded that I was examined by another doctor.

Only in 2018 or 2019, when I repeatedly demanded documents on 23 Oct. 2013 from St.-Mary"s medical archive and from Sante Quebec"s database, I received an additional document (see below):


This was an ophthalmological report. It was signed by an unknown to me Dr. Basmadjian, but nor his full name, either his medical license was not mentioned. Dr. Basmadjian is mentioned as an ophthalmologist, but how could he practice without his full name and his license number?! However, I found out that Dr. Girar Basmadjian is indeed working at St.-Mary"s Ophthalmology Department. I was not able to find Dr. Basmadjian"s photos, but I was now almost sure that Dr. Lewis was not the man, who examined my vision on 23 Oct. 2013.

I am not a specialist on medical writing, but it seems that, besides the vision acuity (20 / 20 and 20 / 25), the intraocular pressure (IOP) was also mentioned (20 in both eyes). [Besides the dangerous posteriors vitreous body detachment.] I saw in another printout (in the medical archive; this paper later disappear) an IOP mark (in doctor"s or in his assistant office) 25. This alarming IOP should automatically trigger the follow-ups and the additional ophthalmological exams. However, in violations of all norms and protocols, I was sent home WITHOUT any treatment, any follow-up, or any further tests and exams!


Considering all these facts, my intention to seek an alternative medical opinion was completely justified.


All these improbable incidents at the Emergency Room and the Ophthalmology of St.-Mary"s hospital were retrospectively projected to the circumstances around the vitreous body detachment (the l. eye), which already in themselves relocate the vitreous body destruction to the phenomenon category.


From the very 1-st moment I had realized that the vitreous body detachment has constituted a delayed complication of the suspicious vertigo on 7 Jan. 2013, and was speeded up (triggered) by something that happened during the MRI-X-Ray procedure on 16 Oct. 2013 (this suggestion came to my mind only in November, 2013), and the vertigo itself was caused by an attack by a secret remote weapon, which sends the microwave radiation directed to its victim. If this working hypothesis is correct (and this is an only logical and reliable technically and medically explanation), and if the hypothesis that the authorities assumed that I was not "occasionally" hit by car back in 2007: then everything that happened in October, 2007 (after the car accident), and in January and in October 2013 in St.-Mary"s hospital was a cover-up operation.

I don"t believe that the Canadian or Quebec"s government gave a green light for any foreign or foreign-domestic group for a physical violence over dissidents, or for any inhuman experiments and for testing a secret microwave weapon on the objectionable persons, but - as the international status of Canada was constantly declining - the Canadian regime was eager to avoid any international scandals and revelations, especially involving Canada"s allies. And - because a very neatly prepared (set up) "accident", or the tests of a secret weapon (based on new, revolutionary, technologies) could be organized by very serious people, Canadian central and local authorities just preferred to close their eyes. However, any inaction would not stop the leak of information. Consequently, for the purpose of destroying evidential material base, they needed a cover-up.


The cover-up has automatically initiated the propaganda and counter-propaganda bureaucratic functions and mechanisms, which gradually evolved since September 2001 - becoming more and more important in the epoch of the population"s impoverishment, rapidly growing social inequality, and injustice.

As always in history, the government is needed an external enemy pattern to justify its oppression. All this transferred my "simple" case into the political dimension, and, in turn, has triggered an even more complex, multistage and perplexed scheme.

Let's suggest that the interested persons knew for certain that the destruction of the vitreous body can occur for the natural reasons, but also knew about a theoretical possibility of the same in result of eye"s injury by the modern technologies. Afflicted with propaganda and counter-propaganda war, these political forces could expect an undesirable effect of the "plausibility" of my expected narrative if my statement will be supported by the official documents.


Not casually Quebec"s journalist Patrick Lagace - in his article "Je ne serai pas candidat" in La Presse (Montreal French newspaper) - has emphasized (August 18, 2015) that - though the governmental dodge to supervise totally the media was not Harper"s invention, - it was Stephen Harper - under whom the governmental control over the printed (and oral!) word has reached an unprecedented level and scope. It is possible just to imagine how enrages "the brotherhood" each time - when someone puts his (her) publications on Russian Internet as though escapes from under their control.


These supposed motives could explain an unusual (by its boldness) sabotage of medical help (care), which could provoke a situation when I could lose an eye, if it was the retinal detachment, and the "leapfrog" with doctors" names, and the obvious withdrawal of a number of documents from the medical archive.


And this all puts the circumstances of the vitreous body destruction in the centre of focus again.


It is necessary to pay attention that such procedures as MRI and X-Ray are potentially harmful if an error, malfunction, or a violation of the protocol occurs. While the potential harmfulness of MRI itself is under a constant discussion, very few people are aware of the fact that, in addition to the electromagnetic resonant scanning, this procedure assumes the scanning of patient"s body by the laser technology for the purpose of the electronic-computer detection and adjustment of patient"s positioning, and the automatic (computerized) control of the mechanism of the bed"s (stretcher"s) movement inside the "semi-pipe" device. Patient"s scanning is made for the detection of patient"s position by means of the laser. And it is well known that the laser rayon can damage the eyes, inflicting such injuries, which can lead to the vitreous body detachment, the formation of a cataract, and to other complications.


During the MRI procedure the patient is an easy target due to his (her) full immovability (for relatively long time) and being positioned in a strictly certain place.


Potentially dangerous are also the surveillance cameras, exploited for spying on people. They also radiate the harmful rays, which can injure sensitive or vulnerable individuals, or depending of the situation or the conditions. The spy-cameras are placed in Montreal literally everywhere so densely all over the city that all buildings, street poles (etc.) are literally covered by them.


The reliable sources are telling that it is not the first year since these video cameras are equipped not only of the watching or watching-listening, but also of the punishing functions, similarly to the devices solely designed and produced for this only purpose, like "Medusa", which operates by sending the microwave irradiation for the purpose of generating hallucinations and panic in peoples" brain, and can cause serious brain injuries.


The surveillance camera located on the ceiling of aforementioned Jean-Talon hospital"s MRI facility was a monster of its kind: a champion-size enormously huge sphere. A combination of MRI - laser scanning - X-ray - and the irradiation from this monster surveillance video camera could theoretically injure my eyes in addition to the assault by an unknown device (7 Jan. 2013), which caused the attack of sickness together with the enormous vertigo.


WIKiPedia puts it in the next way: "Radiation. Ultraviolet light, specifically UVB (...). Microwave radiation has also been found to cause cataracts. The mechanism is unclear, but it may include changes in heat-sensitive enzymes that normally protect cell proteins in the lens. Another possible mechanism is direct damage to the lens from pressure waves induced in the aqueous humor. Cataracts have been associated with ionizing radiation such as X-rays. The addition of damage to the DNA of the lens cells has been considered.[17] Finally, electric and heat injuries denature and whiten the lens as a result of direct protein coagulation.[13] This same process makes the clear albumen of an egg become white and opaque during cooking. Cataracts of this type are often seen in glassblowers and furnace workers. Lasers of sufficient power output are known to damage the eyes and skin". This article speaks about the cataract, but the same mechanisms may be responsible for the vitreous detachment as well.


4 police cars appeared on my way home from the Emergency Room (23 Oct. 2013), not demonstratively escorting or intercepting, but their number somehow reads off scale. But other 2 police cars for certain were following me not casually: it was 20-5 and 20-8 (and, probably, 20-3).


When I came home, the apartment"s front door was unlocked. In 10 minutes prior to my arrival, my younger daughter has left our dwelling. She has answered my question in the following way: she precisely remembers that locked the door. Has she wrongly turned a key not to the right side? No, when the key is not turned up to the end - it is impossible to pull it out. To turn a key "not to the right side" is impossible with our lock in general: it simply does not turn. Does it mean that someone (a stranger) has visited our apartment? My marks in the hall were destroyed, but this can be related to my daughter"s coming. But the fact that they were also broken in other places, too: it is already an alarm call.


I can not be sure in my own case, but in the memoirs of the "underground workers" the frank (demonstrative) police shadowing or escorting is linked to unauthorized searches in activist-resident"s absence, and the police is obliged to inform the "colleagues" about this activist"s present location.


Right after my visit to Dr. Basmadjian (the ophthalmologist) (who, I thought, was Dr. John R. Lewis, before obtaining an additional document from the medical archive) dozens of spam messages (advertisements of the contact lenses, glasses, frames, remedies and techniques for vision improvement) have started to arrive to all my e-mail addresses (and I have not 1 or 2 of them!).

At that time I did not tell anybody (by an e-mail) what happened; so, the spam-flooding on this subject could not be initially connected with the per-lustration of my e-mails. An additional detail: an absolutely IDENTICAL spam targeted ALL my e-mail accounts. It means that the senders have perfectly known, who the recipient is, and that all these email addresses have one owner.


(3 real examples of the different versions of such spam are given in my series of articles [License to Kill] for December, 2013; Balandin"s and Mashkov"s web sites).


Let's pay attention to 3 strangest details:


1) a part of these hundreds of spam messages with the advertisements of the vision improvement techniques and remedies came AT ONCE right after my visit to St.-Mary"s Ophthalmology, and this type of messages were composed by people who don"t speak Russian, and who used the machine translation; while another part comprised a heading with a machine translation and the body text (of the message) already in pure Russian (a strangest combination); and the third part: a text-hybrid combining a machine translation and normal Russian (that I never, ever saw in spam);

2) the whole spam came to my Polish, French, German, etc. mailboxes IN RUSSIAN that occurs only when the senders know accurately that a Russian-speaking person is behind all these addresses; in 2013, typically, it was a norm when exclusively spam in Russian arrived to e-mail addresses with ".ru" at the end [ @mail.ru, @rambler.ru, etc.]; but when a Russian spam was coming to e-mail addresses with .pl, .fr, .de (etc.): it was not a work of the ordinary spammers...; really, if, let"s assume, an electronic mailbox of my Polish relative - .....pl - could be (theoretically, but not obviously) "flashed" on Russian Internet, my other mail boxes - don"t! Moreover, I write from my second Polish email account address exclusively in Polish, and the circle of my recipients are the Poles. I write from my German email box - in German, from my French account - in French; neither on one of my web site, nor at any forum or files sharing sites these addresses were never "flu"! Even my "reserved" email address, which I never used, and kept for any force-major case, was flooded by the same spam;

3) the first of the huge series of such profile"s spam already arrived BEFORE I came to St.-Mary"s Emergency Room (23 Oct. 2013) but when the initial symptoms of the vitreous body detachment have been already materialized; I told about them ONLY my close ones, and ONLY BY PHONE or at home.


After 23 Oct. 2013, EACH visit of a doctor began to be accompanied by a wave of spam of the corresponding sort.


As soon as I was visiting an immunologist, a nephrologist, or gastroenterologist - on the same day dozens of identical spam messages used to start arriving to ALL my email addresses with 1) an immunological subject, 2) a nephrological subject, and 3) with a subject related to the stomach, intestines, etc.


After the exam by Dr. Basmadjian, the police also changed the tactics (taking into consideration my vision acuity and other individual features of my vision). It was obvious that all the conclusions (findings) of the visual exam were leaked to police, and the police started to take advantage of my vision"s defects to prevent my escape from under their surveillance. The same happened after the audiology exam. All kinds of provocations and attacks (including police intimidation) started to take into consideration my individual hearing characteristics.


Summing up, it is possible to draw the following conclusions.


Police is escorting me in any medical institution, whatever I used to visit in that period; in reply to each of my visits to this or that specialist doctor, or in response to each specific health problem - a stream of spam (which was sticking out this problem) follows.


By the evening, after my visit to "ophthalmologist" (23 October 2013), I had the heart pain: 1-st time in the last 2 years. Whether it was an allergic reaction to what was in the eye drops by "ophthalmologist" and his nurse, whether a reaction to the events of the last days...


At the same time with the vitreous body detachment and the heartaches, the following symptoms have manifested (since October 17-th, 2013): a slight burning in the kidneys and bladder; liver pains; pricking (since October 21-st) in the right groin: as though - at change of the body position - something was touched there in the intestines; a weak pain at first in one (right), then in both kidneys; "bags" under the eyes; a sharp fall of the blood pressure (October 16-21), which later (also suddenly and quickly) returned into the norm; unpleasant feelings.


The kidney pain (or maybe a muscular pain in the kidneys) lasted about 2 weeks.


CHAPTER 5


In the section (of this series of articles) for October 24, 2013, I described how the concierge tried to photograph our apartment, ignoring my verbal protests. Whether casually in a week later literally a "photo search" (it is hard to call it differently) was executed in our apartment: the municipal office declared that will send the exterminators to us...


Here (below) is a copy of the blood-urine test, made on the order from one of 3 walk-in clinics" (which I visited in the end of October beginning of November, 2013) doctors. Maybe, it can give a clue to an independent expert, who would have a will to investigate, what exactly happened to me in January-October, 2013.


Blood test (October 28, 2013). In the laboratory, I gave the fax number of my family doctor - and asked to send a copy to him, and also - for reliability - handed him over a copy myself. However, nor the doctor who ordered this test, nor my family doctor told NOTHING (to me) about the abnormal (high) sugar (glucose), and did not assign any treatment, diet recommendations, or additional tests.

The same is concerning the high bilirubin.

Concerning the high sugar (glucose) on December 14, 2010 (already at the level of the 1-st stage of the pre-diabetes!): doctors also told nothing to me, as well as about the high glucose level in many further tests" results in 2010-2013 (I could receive the copies of many of them only years later). And even when I repeatedly have raised the question (when visited my family doctor (20 June 2012) of the constantly growing glucose (sugar) level, which indication sometimes jumped to 5.9 and 6.4, the doctor replied that 1) the index 6.4 is supposedly not diabetes yet; 2) there are no bases for an alarm, allegedly, because, taking into account other indexes, "on scientific" basis, there is nothing serious yet; and that 3) after an index 6.4 the level of glucose (in one of the later tests) has fell to 5.9. After this my family doctor did no further comments (that, for example, it is necessary to lose weight, to change a diet, etc.), even when in one blood test the glucose level has jumped to 7.0.

I don"t like any insinuations, and I try to avoid them, but my personal impression is that - if even the glucose level would jump to 10.0 - 16.0 - the doctors would tell me nothing anyways, and would not prescribe any treatment. Why they are biased against me, and what are their motives: it is another question.

My assumption that the growing level of glucose in blood can signify the liver, kidneys and thyroid gland partial hormonal dysfunction (since the 2-nd half of 2001 reflected by the tests, X-rays and ultrasonography, and the fact that the enzyme responsible for the lipolysis is not withon the norm), and that it would be quite good "to treat the liver", the doctor has responded by silence - and gave no comments.

Exhausted with urological, dermatological, and other problems, I "was led" to his soothing tone, and only from the 2-nd half of 2014 sat down to read the texts about the diabetes, its prevention and treatment. And I "found" (in the academic medical literature) an absolutely "different truth" about the glucose (sugar) level in blood and its value (than what told me 3 doctors).


Because of the whole combination of symptoms; because I was feeling very unwell; and because my vision was deteriorating more and more (and I could not write, read, and function normally): I decided to seek a medical help.


On October 25, 2013, I went to a walk-in clinic of the neighbor area. 2 police cars have escorted me literally till the clinic"s doors.


In this clinic - I waited many hours: an unusually long time. I was not called to a doctor until everyone who came after me was assessed, and left home. No people remained any more in the waiting room, except of me, and only by then, at last, they called me to a doctor. The doctor has declared - on my complaints - that "sees nothing". I was given no medical help, no medications, no advises, and no referrals. My demands to see an ophthalmologist, and to have a permanent access to the ophthalmological services: were imprudently ignored. Being ostracized, isolated, denied an access to Internet search engines, and put virtually under a house arrest, I was not aware that I can get an access to an ophthalmologist through a optometrist, but the doctor did not explain to me even this. It is an obviously natural logical way of perception: to see a connection between the police"s escort to a medical institution - and the discrimination-persecution-sabotage in this medical institution.


Because I was refused medical help in the walk-in clinic, I had no other options, but to visit (next day) my family doctor. On October 26, 2013, when I have paid this visit to my family doctor, the police car 26-1 defiantly slowly passed by at the very moment of my approach to the medical building. This is the 7-th time in a row, when the police cars pass by 1-2 seconds prior to my entrance into this medical building. There is a gas refueling station just across the street, densely covered with the surveillance cameras, so, probably, for this reason the police manage to taxi up so precisely by the time of my approach. By the beginning of 2013, in this medical building (with my family doctor"s office) - have already appeared the surveillance cameras (even at the entrance to my doctor"s office waiting room), spying on visitors. When - after I left my family doctor - I went to St.-Mary"s Emergency Room (because I did not achieve anything, even a referral to an ophthalmologist), the police car 57-20 (which turned around and left as soon as I entered into the ER) has taxied up and demonstratively blocked me the way, when I approached to the hospital.


CHAPTER 6


NOVEMBER, 2013.


From 26 to 29 October, 2013, I was visiting one walk-in clinic or a CLSC after another one (one by one), until - in the 1-st week of November, 2013 - one of the doctors from the walk-in clinics has wrote out for me a referral to ophthalmologist, and - on November 13 - I managed to get an appointment with an ophthalmologist at Clinique ophthalmologique de l"ouest. I was examined by Dr. Pierre Brais (during my visit to this ophthalmology clinic, he, by unknown reason, replaced another doctor, who was examining me first).


[In the end of October 2013, I got a referral to another medical specialist, too (to a surgeon) [for a different (not the ophthalmological) problem], but did not use it, because by the time when I finally have got this referral (with a fight) - I succeeded to cure the problem myself, without the doctors.]


If I was treated in St.-Mary"s ophthalmological clinic humanly, and received the follow-ups, and a permanent ophthalmological care, I would not need another appointment. I was thrown out without complete diagnostics, without follow-ups, without the repeated exams, and without being registered as a permanent patient.


So, because I was boldly denied the medical care in the public hospital, I was forced to turn now to a private ophthalmologic clinic: naturally, because I was anxious to receive an access to the preventive measures for the prevention of further complications, including glaucoma and cataract.


This is what I wrote down in my brief diary (and later transferred into my essay series License to Kill) right after coming home from the clinic (13 Nov. 2013):


"At first I was examined by the doctor of this eye-clinic, whose surname appears in the policlinic"s brochure, on the list of doctors. But very quickly I was transferred to another office, where an elderly doctor (speaking French) continued the exam".


Unfortunately, I did not write down the name of the 1-st doctor right away.


When I approached the clinic, I was watched closely by the police car 71-5 and police car 1-5. (The same police car (1-5) very slowly passed by in the very minute when I exited the building). When I left the clinic, 2 police officers were walking behind me, too.


I was admitted at 16.40 in the "Clinique ophtalmologique de l'ouest" as an ordinary patient, and, apparently, only the secretary could be "warned" in advance about my visit, and only she has asked strange questions. (In particular, she has asked to tell her my day of birth, my address, postal code, and phone number, and other personal data"s details, though all this has already been printed in the document, which I gave to her - together with the referral from the policlinic. She"d even demanded mine "former address and phone number", my "e-mail address and a fax", "the last place of work", "full names of mother, father and wife", etc.).


For this reason, as I believe, I was forwarded to a "usual" (not "pre-informed" and forced to be biased) doctor, and only by then - already from her office - have been redirected to Dr. Pierre Brais.


More truly, at first I was checked on the visual acuity whether by a nurse, whether by an optometrist, and only by then - by a woman of unclear age (between 30 and 45), called as "the doctor..." (her surname I have not catch or not remembered).


Thinking of who could work for this clinic, or to cooperate with it in 2013, I came to a conclusion, that, most likely, I was first seen by Dr. Katarzyna Biernacki, or by Dr. Geneviève Mercille. Most probable, it was Dr. Biernacki.


Both, the doctor, and the nurse, in the beginning treated me as an ordinary patient, their behavior abruptly changed after a short break, when the doctor received a phone call, and then left the room for 2 min. or 3. When she returned, her speech, her attitude, her gestures: everything changed as if she was confused, perplexed, and received a dubious ethically order.


And, in general, something artificial was in their behavior, words, and gestures, at the moment, when they relocated me from this female doctor to Dr. Pierre Brais; some tensions could be felt by the "spinal brain" as if something unexpected has occurred from "outside" the clinic (like the "extraneous forces" has interfered).


The female doctor was asking me the routine questions, and, among them, were the questions if I ever passed the "champ visual" (the conversation was in French) and the photo-image tests, and this, by logic, assumed that she was intended to take me to these tests or to order them. Doctor Brais, in return, never mentioned these tests, and did not provide them for me.


If the female doctor and her nurse (or an optometrist) did not do or said anything strange, after my relocation to Doctor Pierre Brais I started to feel and hear the "riddles". Dr. Brais looked like a very knowing and skilled doctor, and an extremely disciplined and responsible person. He has made a positive impression upon me. Though he looked youthful and tightened, read the documents and examined me without the eyeglasses, he was, apparently, somewhere under 70, and even 75-77.


He, in his words, has confirmed the fact of a vitreous body detachment (the left eye), has told me that the intraocular pressure is "normal", and that the acuity of my vision, despite of what happened, was "almost in norm". But - when I have asked to tell the exact figures-parameters of the intraocular pressure and visual acuity, he has flatly refused. By then already this alone was suspicious. Accompanying my mother do innumerous ophthalmologists, or after speaking to friends, I remember that any ophthalmologist not only did not refuse to tell such parameters (as the visual acuity, intraocular pressure, visual field, etc.) - to my mother, to my friends, or to my wife"s friends, but also allowed to write down, and even wrote themselves, or printed out the whole data. And my mother was examined not less than by 25 ophthalmologists.


The only information Dr. Brais has disclosed to me was his findings that I have no cataract. He really inspected my eyes by the slot lamp, and came to this conclusion.


Concerning the vitreous body detachment, doctor Brais has answered my inquiries willingly and with visible sympathy, but, when I have gone deeper into the medical details, it has appeared that he simply laughed over me in a special way, having composed the whole "fairy tale" on the reasons, side affects and the biological mechanism behind the vitreous body detachment (and I, by naivety, have inserted his "composition" into one of my earlier written sections of my chronicle).

According to him, something like a "jelly" of the vitreous body at "destruction", allegedly, "flows down" the retina, leaving traces on it - as on a windowpane, and from here by then are the "veils", "floaters", "front sights", etc. - to "the rest of the life" - through which the looser (who was not lucky) must look at the world. Only much later, it has become clear that - even in a form of an extreme simplification - this was a deliberately distorted model.


Doctor Brais has talked to me in a derisive manner, as with a child, and, at the same time, with a hidden threat, as though was obviously in a course of my suspicions (already stated on Russian Internet - in the Runet) concerning the circumstances of the vitreous body detachment. He has stubbornly insisted on the very unique reason of the vitreous body destruction: "old age". But, when I have asked him why then only a small percent of "old men" of my age suffers from this misfortune, he has simply shrugged his shoulders. [The 2nd visit to him is described in the following section of this "New" chronicle - for 2014.]


This is (above) the receipt of the visit to the ophthalmologic clinic "Clinique ophtalmologique de l'ouest". Let"s pay attention that they charged me more than normally the ophthalmologists charge non-private patients for the tests.


After his examination, I have asked doctor Brais to write down for me (or to print out) the parameters of the intraocular pressure and visual acuity, and the rest - what the doctor will consider important. But he responded by the flat and resolute refusal of my demand. So, I have addressed and to the secretary with the same request (to print out the parameters of the intraocular pressure and visual acuity, which the doctor recorded), but she replied that they "do not give out" such copies. Besides, she became enraged for no reasons, and almost expelled me from the clinic for such a natural and polite demand. But there is more to come.


In "completion" - in a month or more - the secretary of "Clinique ophtalmologique de l'ouest" has contacted me by phone, and has declared that, allegedly, I have not paid the 30 dollars for the visit to the doctor (Alkain's drops, and the examination by the nurse-optometrist: the only 2 thing that are not covered by the state medical card"s insurance program). I had to send her (by fax) a copy of the payment confirmation. Only later, I have judged that it would be better not to send this fax, but to wait for their next move, and to transfer this whole affair into the juridical rails. Running forward: after my 2-nd visit to the same clinic next year the secretary of "Clinique ophtalmologique de l'ouest" (this time few months after my visit) has called me again, and I was again accused of not paying the 40-dollars check. Only months later I understood the trick: they have exploited the pretext of, allegedly, my refusal to pay for my visit as a justification for not appointing the follow ups. In reality, my younger daughter - who has come to pick me up to the "Clinique ophtalmologique de l'ouest" (because, after the retinal test, I could not see and could not go out alone) - has paid by her credit card. So, the "Clinique ophtalmologique de l'ouest" used a criminal fraud of fabricating my alleged "debt" for the reputing of the medical obligation to issue the follow-ups.


When I was sitting in the previous office with the female doctor, where her assistant has measured my intraocular pressure and the visual acuity, one of these two women has named the figures "19" and "20" to her colleague. What could it be, if not the indicators of the intraocular pressure? It means that the IOP was again on the verge of the norm, and, if so, a medical necessity was to appoint the follow-ups.


Later (in 2014), when I told one of the doctors about Dr. Brais, he said: "Ah, this military guy!". Was Dr. Brais a military doctor, was he working for USA or Canadian army, or was he an officer of United States army?


I also found out that Dr. Brais (exactly as Dr. Basmadjian) was an optometrist, and only later became an ophthalmologist.


I also heard from people and red online that Dr. Brais was a very knowledgeable doctor with excellent diagnostic skills (so, I was correct in my supposition), but (in the same time) - one of the most irresponsible, indifferent, negligent, and helpless or even dangerous medic for too many of his patients.


Most of his patients reported a breach of ethics, or even medical crimes:


a) "Très déçue de ma seule et unique visite. Aucune écoute. N'essaie pas de comprendre. N'essaie pas d'expliquer. Porte des jugements. Ne propose aucune piste de solution ou de compréhension du problème. Je suis sortie de cette clinique très déprimée".

b) ''Très froid, toujours trop pressé. Quand on lui pose une question, il ne regarde même pas son patient.ne montre aucun intérêt ! On dirait qu'il essaie de faire le plus vite possible à chaque patient pour aller voir le prochain et ainsi de suite...Il m'a dit qu'il ne pouvait rien faire pour moi et ne m'a même pas conseillé, ni réconforter. Il m'a dit ''AU PIRE VOUS DEVIENDREZ AVEUGLE !!''

c) "Si on se fie à ce site on dit qu'il est optométriste alors que je le consulte depuis plus de 12 ans comme ophtalmologiste. Je le revois bientôt et je pense que son bureau fonctionne avant tout à la quantité de clients et non à la qualité du service. Je passe tous les 4-5 un examen de la vue ailleurs chez un optométriste et à chacune des fois on me trouve une certaine anomalie à l'œil. Quand je vois le docteur Brais peu de temps après, il ne voit rien. Qui dit vrai ?"

d) Très désagréable, nous sommes que des minables pour lui. Il prend les gens pour des stupides. Il devrait prendre sa retraite !!!

e) Mauvais diagnostic. Oeil paresseux n'était dû qu'à une cataracte.

f) Lorsqu'il m'a posé ses questions, il ne m'écoutait pas, il répondait presque lui-même à ses questions, très condescendant... J'avais l'impression de ne pas être à ma place. Il a terminé en disant qu'il ne pouvait rien pour moi. Alors je lui demandé qui devrais-je aller voir ; il ne m'a fait aucune suggestion, aucune ! Finalement, c'est un neurologue qui a mis le doigt sur le bobo. Ce que je reproche au Dr Braie, c'est de ne pas m'avoir donné de référence pour un autre spécialiste (dans ce cas-ci un neurologue); je considère qu'il aurait dû être capable.

g) On se sent toujours un peu niaiseux assis devant lui et on s'excuse presque de l'avoir dérangé...pour rien finalement...Je l'ai vu parce que ma mère était suivi par lui et j'ai compris pourquoi une personne âgée était anxieuse d'aller ..le déranger...Dr. Brais prenez donc votre retraire.

h) Je souhaite que le Dr Brais a cessé de rencontrer des patients. Il m'a suivi pour un glaucome pendant 20 ans. Vu son incompétence j'ai perdu la vision d'un oeil. Il se prend pour le nombril de monde... il fait des commentaires désobligeants ! Dommage que j'aie eu cet ophtalmo car j'aurais eu de meilleurs soins. Juste à écrire ces lignes et j'en suis toute bouleversée ! Quelle personne antipathique et non professionnelle.

i) M'a suivi pendant + de 20 ans après mon retour de Toronto où on me suivait pour prévenir un glaucome. Vu l'an dernier et comme à chaque fois me demandait pourquoi je le voyais ? Je reviens d'une visite chez un autre Ophtalmo qui me dit que mon nerf optique est attaqué, ma pression oculaire est au-dessus de 21 et on me prescrit des gouttes pour le restant de mes jours. J'aurais été aveugle qu'il ne s'en serait pas aperçu. Quel incompétent. Vaut toujours mieux avoir une deuxième opinion. Heureusement qu'il n'est plus là et que le diable l'emporte :(

j) Hi have been seeing this Dr. for many years before he retires. Everything was always fine, the visit were like super quick. Now that I have changed clinic with a new Dr. I find out I have loads of eye problems that could have been avoided hat they been detected and treated. Very glad he retired!

k) J'ai consulté Dr. Brais pour une infection virale grave aux 2 yeux. Il m'a chargé ~10$ par goutte de fluorescéine (non remboursable). Malgré la gravité de mon infection, il m'a seulement prescrit un corticostéroïde sans aucun suivi.

l) Antipathique, désintéressé, à ce que je lis je ne suis pas la seule à avoir perdu temps et argent a sa clinique. Il demande ce que j'ai puis me corrige de façon condescendante lorsque j'essaie d'expliquer de mon mieux, pcq lui seul peut poser un diagnostic. Moi aussi j'ai les yeux qui coulent toujours alors que je n'avais rien supposément. A ma question sur mes yeux fatigues, tant qu'a m'être déplacée pour rien, il répond ; "Reposez-vous". A quand une retraite monsieur Brais ?

m) Il aurait été intéressant pour moi de consulter ce site avant d"aller voir Dr Brais, ophtalmologiste. Je me serais épargné une visite fort désagréable avec un homme qui a une attitude condescendante. Comme le rapporte l"un des témoignages Dr Brais pose des questions et y répond lui-même, notre présence dans son bureau semble l"importuner. Il ne démontre aucune empathie. Pour ce qui est de l"examen, il n"aurait pas vérifié le fond d'œil si je ne lui avais pas rappelé le motif de la consultation. Il l"a fait en se moquant et en spécifiant que de toute façon il n"y avait rien à faire et que peut-être un jour je serais aveugle. Évidemment ce sera mon unique visite au bureau du Dr Brais.

n) Dr. Brais. 2 visites, Il est désagréable et pas sympathique. Je l'ai entendu parler de façon désobligeante à une patiente qui pleurait... N'a rien trouvé à mes yeux, quand ça fait plus de 2 mois qu'ils coulent sans arrêt. Vraiment le pire docteur que j'ai rencontré. Il était très bête...Je plains son entourage. J'ai changé d'ophtalmologiste.

o) Élémentaire pour un médecin spécialiste de lire attentivement le papier de référence du médecin de famille, non ? Pas pour le Dr Brais à ce qu'il semble. Il avait fait mon examen sans même jeter un œil sur mon dossier et sans vérifier le fond d'œil, motif de la consultation (corps vitré). C'était ma deuxième visite et il n'y en aura pas d'autre à moins que je sois très mal prise. Semble peu intéressé, fait des remarques désobligeantes. Peut-être bien compétent, mais absence de qualités humaines. Toutefois, le fait qu'il soit âgé ne devrait pas susciter de commentaires négatifs.

p) Premier examen ophtalmologique ; j'avise le médecin que je suis très "douillette", que le fait de me faire jouer dans les yeux m'indispose énormément. Aucune empathie, aucune envie de faire sa job ce matin-là. N'est pas du tout sympathique à ma cause. Résultat : dernière fois que je me présente à cette clinique.


Dr. Brais" cardinally different treatment of different patients can be explained only by the monetary interest. I suggest that he has treated humanly only the patients with a private insurance or with deep pockets. This suggestion confirmed by the next online statement:


"Insurance accepted by this Doctor: Aetna; Blue Cross / Blue Shield; BCBS Georgia; CIGNA; Coventry Healthcare; Coventry Health Care; Humana; Medicaid / Medi-Cal; UnitedHealthcare".


This is an unusual listing, because normally an online statement advises: "Please, call the Doctor's office to find out if your insurance plan is accepted".


Another motive for treating different patients cardinally different could be Dr. Brais" participation in some sort of cover-up and repressive operations against certain individuals.


It could not be occasionally that I was directed to such special personalities as Dr. Girair Basmadjian and Dr. Pierre Brais. It could not be accidently that both of them criminally sabotaged the follow-ups. It could not be accidently that both of them insisted that the posteriors vitreous body detachment (VBD) is exclusively product of aging. It could not be accidently that both of them, known for their unwillingness to speak with the patients and to explain the findings, were very talkative with me, and told me THE SAME deceptive fairy tale about the process and the mechanism behind the VBD. It could not be accidently that the police was monitoring me most intensively on my way to these two doctors; as if someone wanted to be sure that I got into the trap.


CHAPTER 7


On November 24, 2013, during my trips and pedestrian walk - the police cars either waited in "key points" (on the crossings with the main road; at the entrances and departures to the tunnels; at the entrances under the bridges or a departure from under a bridge; at the entrances and the departures from the bridges, etc.), or openly and even in a pointed manner accompanied me (escorted).


In this period of time, I had appointments with 5 medical doctors, and all of them told me to book a follow-up appointment in 2-3 months. However, I could not book an appointment, because it was blocked in one or in another way. After all my persistent attempts to meet at least one of the same 5 doctors have not been crowned by success, I have sent a fax to 3 of them, insisting on an urgent rendezvous and putting forward my arguments. Fortunately, I was seen by 2 of them in the next few days.


The secretary of my family doctor has also called, and has told, that if I come during this week - maybe, the doctor will find time to see me.


On Thursday, November 26, 2013, I came to my family doctor"s office, as the secretary told, but the doctor could not see me, and then she has written out an appointment (on the card) for another date. I already left the office, and came downstairs, when, remembering the former misadventures, pulled out the card from my pocket - and have looked at the date. There was the date "November 30, 2013" - but this is Saturday! Neither on Saturday, nor on Sunday my family doctor is not in his office, and has no reception, and, in general, he"s not working on weekends, plus - this medical building is closed. The secretary tried to make of me the idiot again. If this occurred 1 time, I could believe that she has done an error. But if this happened the 3-rd time, the chances that she did it intentionally prevail. Having returned back, I have shown her the card and the date written on it. She has apologized, and has told that "was mistaken". When she has taken in head to correct the date on top of the already written out appointment, I have told her that I could be confused, and asked her to write it out on a new, another appointment card; then the phone rang, and the card with the odious date remained with me - as a material evidence.


On November 27, 2013 (12.58) the police car 15-12, with the license plate number FGF-5547, has stopped at the intersection precisely at the moment of my exit from the underground (for a half-quarter from the doctor), then turned to the street where I normally turn off.


So, on November 27, 2013, I came again to my family doctor"s office, and he has refused to carry out the examination - instead of which he has written out a referral to another doctor, whom I managed to see surprisingly quickly. It is necessary to add that I was kept waiting for my family doctor"s reception 3 and a half hours (!): some kind of a record. (A normal waiting time in my family doctor"s office, unlike others doctors, is ranging from 30 minutes to 1-1,5 hours). In spite of the fact that I came 15 minutes prior to the time appointed to me, I was admitted the last: when no other patients have remained in the waiting room, except me. My appointment has been scheduled to 9.10 in the mornings, but I have left only (approximately) at 12.30.


On my way to my family doctor and from him I was openly escorted by police:


On my way to the doctor - the police car 15-12 in my area, and the police car 26-8 near the doctor; back home - in the opposite order: 26-8, then 15-12 (and 15-13?).


In the last days of November, 2013, when I have finished the conversation on Skype with my colleague Evgeny Lel, I received a call from an unfamiliar user. Having hesitated for a time, I nevertheless have answered this call. I have heard a monotonous, muttering voice in English which at first I has taken for an automatic recording. Then I have understood that it was a speech of a live person, but his voice has passed through a voice coder, a fazer, or other "sucker", which distort the voice.


I silently listened, but I am sure that if I had answered - the dialogue would be possible. It was something like a parody to an advertising or a message about the prevention (or a danger) of the skin infections and the venereal diseases.


I have right there turned on the screen video capture, and have started to record this voice message. Suddenly the screen has begun to blink, and the computer restarted. The record has been lost.


It is impossible to interpret this anonymous trick differently, rather than a threat, accompanied by a subsequent hacker invasion into my computer. The restarting of the computer speaks about a very professional provocation.


DECEMBER, 2013.


On December 2, 2013 (21.59), the police car with a flasher light deliberately slowly passed by in a pointed manner (with a flasher!!!) 6 seconds after my exit from Metro, then came back and (with a flasher!) slowly escorted me. (The illustrations (pictures) can be seen in the appropriate section of the other version of this series of my articles for November, 2013).


On December 5, 2013, an antibiotic Cipro-XI was prescribed, and - after its course - the main symptoms of the acute aggravation have been disappeared again. But one and only unique time, only after an UNFINISHED (incomplete) course of Protrin, really ALL the indispositions and diseases have abruptly stopped from the end of October till December, 2012 (vanished as if by magic!). It can indirectly indicate what exactly microorganism (or their combination) has destroyed my live.


The temporary remission lasted and continued also in February, 1914: coinciding with the fracture of the right foot"s toe in March, and the operation of an abscess removal in May, 2014, when during 4 months (!) the postoperative wound did not heal and suppurated (up to the end of August, 2014), at complete inaction and refusal for the medical care from the doctors. (This time the responsibility and the guilt for this next torture should be assigned not to the team of St.-Mary's hospital"s Emergency Room - where THAT TIME everything was done correctly and without complaints (it was - in connection with the renovations-repairs - an absolutely new (another) team of younger medical staff, including the doctors), but to the secretary of ER"s registration office, and on those health services - which have been obliged to carry out the post-operational treatment and to do the bandaging.


(Since February 2014, I, during 5 months, took not those blood-pressure controlling pills, which I was receiving from the pharmacy, but others (identical) that I got on the Internet.)


During my evening walk on December 12, 2013, on me way back home, a Ford car with the "Securite" inscription onboard, and with the same emblem as the Royal Mounted Police (RCMP (gendarmerie), with the license plate number EHF8344 Quebec "has met me" twice. It, by the form, equipment, and secrecy, was probably a very serious service, much more scary than the police was. This car went towards, and, having overtaken me at 23.55, turned around, and, at a snail's pace, with my walking speed, has escorted me to the intersection of the big street, in 2 small quarters (blocks) from my home. Having passed an intersection, the car has stopped on the right side of the street (on which I went), after the corner.


In the driver"s seat was sitting a well-equipped young white "gendarme" in an unclear form, and near him (in the passenger"s chair) - a black girl-"gendarme" sat at the computer. This computer was same as in police cars: the built in.


The "sixth sense" has prompted to me that the emergence of such an "abrupt" car observing me instead of police, is possibly linked with a new denunciation of me.


And - as before - the police jump out, as the devil from a snuffbox, when I come nearer to any medical institution.


On records, photos and dates of the visits to doctors and medical procedures it turns on that that within the same 6 months of a break in persecutions by police, at the same time there was NO even a single time that a police car did not escort me to my visits to doctors. As a rule, the police car approaches in 10-20 seconds after I go out from the car, a Metro station, or a bus (after the Metro mostly typical - in 20-40 seconds); 2 or 3 times cases the police car stood on the opposite to the medical building (where my family doctor"s office) side of the street. And only 1 unique time not a police car, but an unknown car with a flasher and without the identification marks - has passed by in 30 seconds after my exit from the Metro and for about 20 metres from the medical building. At whatever intersection I go out from our personal car, the police passes not later than in 10-20 seconds. Whatever Metro I exit, and to whatever hospital I go, the police car always passes by very slowly in 20-40 seconds.


Judging just by this time indicator and the time difference alone, the materialization (emergence) of police [after my exit from our car (15-20 seconds), or from a bus (10-20 seconds) - and after an exit from Metro (20-40) seconds] cannot be casual.


Not a less important sign that, along with the police cruisers, the Metro (STM) police cars, or municipal police cars (of the same municipal department as police, but with other functions (parking inspection, etc.) have escorted me sometimes to medical institution and on my way back home.


Meanwhile, the intersections, which I pass - when I quit the bus, or emerge from our personal car, or exit from Metro: are not in the areas near a police station and not zones of the frequent police patrolling or exercises - for appearing (near me) steadily and without any exception and delay. Thus, it is an undeniable fact that I am under a very intensive and constant police surveillance.


There was an epoch when the police patrols were darting about on the streets more often than now. Nevertheless, even by then it could happen that - during a whole week - you would not see any police car. Besides, the majority the medical institutions (which I am visiting) are not located in downtown (where the police is still in bulk), but in the remote areas, where sometimes the appearance of police is exotic.


And, finally, even during the periods of less intensive police surveillance (and more), or even when I was monitored exclusively by the under-covered "private" cars, the police immediately emerged as soon as I was approaching to a medical institution. Firstly, at the very moment of approaching (on an exit from transport, etc.) and, secondly (again - as a rule), at the moment of approaching "to the target".


Here are 2 examples from 2012.


On October 22, 2012, when I was on my way to a hospital for a complex diagnostic procedure (almost equated to a surgery), at the moment of an exit from my home the police car has passed at the next street; then, when was entering into the Metro, the police car has passed by again. Then, when I exited from the Metro near the hospital, the police have passed by again.


Inside the hospital, I had to leave my clothes in a locker, and to take only the keys and the general medical card with myself. Before this, the secretary has taken away my plastic hospital card, and has not returned it. On the request to return the card, she has told that old cards must be replaced (by the personnel) by a new one.


However, when I have come back home, I found 2 cards in my pocket there: both the hospital and the general medical card. It means that someone rummaged in my things and (in a pointed manner) put the second card in the pocket.


On October 26, 2013, when I have paid a visit to my family doctor, the police car 26-1 defiantly slowly passed by at the very moment of my approach to the medical building. This was the 7-th time in a row, when (in days of my visits to the doctor) the police cars pass by 1-2 seconds prior to my entrance into this building. There is a gas refueling station just across the street, densely covered with the surveillance cameras. By the beginning of 2013, in the medical building itself - have already appeared the surveillance cameras (even at the entrance to my doctor"s office waiting room). When - after the rendezvous with the family doctor - I went to St.-Mary"s Emergency Room, - the police car 57-20 (which turned around and left as soon as I entered into the ER) has taxied up and demonstratively blocked my way, when I approached to the hospital.


One more important remark: the given cases and photos - are only examples; actually, police escorts and surveillance cases were innumerous: as many - as many visits I paid to the doctors, policlinics, and hospitals. Other examples can be found in other articles of this series, and in other works and articles (not counting a mass of other cases, not shared on Internet because of their overloading plurality).


December 2 - the police car made a "routine" appearance in 6 seconds after my exit from Metro:


December 2, 2013 (21.59). The police car slowly - in a pointed manner (with a flasher!!!) - passes by in 6 seconds after my exit from Metro, then comes back and (with a flasher!) slowly escorts me.


December 4, 2013 (9.20). The police car 26-11 watches our drive.


December 4, 2013 (10.36). The police car 15-8, near my home, at the moment of my arrival from a hospital. When - on December 4, 2013 - I came nearer to a hospital (to visit the medical archive), I saw (through the "field-glass" of my photo-camera) that far ahead, at the corner of one of the crossing (perpendicular) streets, a police car appeared and stopped there. It was just that street on which we should get inevitably. In other words, the police knew in advance that exactly there we should pass (that we cannot omit that corner), and has stopped there few minutes before us. Moreover, as soon as we have turned to the spot where the police car has hidden, the car 26-11 has speeded up to the asphalted platform near the sidewalk. If I did not look into the camera"s screen, I would not see their maneuver because of the distance. And this maneuver has been obviously reckoned and calculated about few seconds by the time of our drive. On my way back, another police car - 15-8 - watched my arrival home precisely near my home. (The police pass extremely seldom on three streets around my home). And, if "each time" it happens when I leave my home or I come back home: this is not a "coincidence".


When I went to the doctor from the Metro (December 5, 2013), I has paid attention to suddenly coarsened skin of fingers" bones. Literally in 2 hours the skin on fingers" bones has become rougher, has reddened (something similar to diathesis), and began to be shelled. As soon as the palms to wet - and skin started to burn terribly. Taught by bitter experience (see the previous records) neither in policlinic, nor in "Fast" I have not gone, but itself, the means, have cured this inflammation.


December 2, 2013: a splinter of an impressive size has emerged on the small pillow of the little finger. Its emergence is inexplicable in general: since the end of November I did not touched any wooden objects. For days on I am now playing piano, or write music behind the synthesizer"s keyboard, or sit at the computer keyboard.


9 Dec. 2013 I had an appointment with an infectologist. On my way to the doctor, the police escorted me again: police cars 26-8. On my way home, the police car 15-12 had escorted me from the exit from Metro to home [16.27].


In couple of days (on December 9, 2013) one more doctor (infectologist) to whom I was sent by my family doctor, has confirmed that it acrocordon. But such a confirmation, though has answered the main question tormenting me, at the same time left mass of other questions. And, at last, there are such "back streets" of our organism where even akrokordona it is better to remove absolutely harmless and tiny "bead".


Now, the police cars slowly pass by (coming nearer behind) - in 70 seconds after my exit from the Metro.


On the way to a doctor (December 5, 2013) and back home - the police escorted me again. The police car 26-8 was escorting me till the medical building; and the police car 15-12 - on my way back home.


Now - a short description of my visit to the infectologist.


First, I asked to refer me to another infectologist (for social and ethical reasons), but it has appeared impossible, and no choice remained for me.


Secondly, during the conversation (with the infectologist) the following subjects were discussed:

1) the urological infections since January 1, 2001 which has led to all other consequences, has caused a set of complications and all other problems;

2) the connection of the urological infection - its recurrence - to arthritis attacks;

3) the connection between the urological infection - and the problems of skin and mucous;

4) the same connection with a short episode of conjunctivitis and teary eye in the following few years;

5) whether it is possible - on the sum of symptoms and by the results of several tests (which have found entherococci and helicobacter pilori) to assume a primary virus or bacterial infection that caused almost all my further health problems;

6) what special tests or analyses need to be made to find this "main" and initial infection.


I also have shortly described several infections with not clear source:

1) warts on the middle finger (r. hand) - no one with warts presents in my environment;

2) herpes (lips) - no physical contact with somebody, who had herpes, never; no one with herpes in my circle;

3) vertigo, combined with poisoning or an infection (13 thousand leucocytes, etc.).


After my requests to refer me to a hematologist, to order a microbiological test, and to perform a biopsy test for 2 neoplasm - I has met an absolutely unexpected and inadequate response from doctor M. Semret: the doctor has declared that my questions and requests are generated by... "morbid depression" ("hypochondria").


And, when I have made an attempt to sum up the history of the urological infections (coming out with an assumption that their frequency and severity triggers the dangerous immune reactions, provoking system"s failure), a yell - which has roughly torn me off - has followed, and it has been declared to me that I should address to doctor Morris with it.


It has not been told "to an urologist", but "to doctor Morris", i.e. he"d been called by his name.


Not only that the infectologist was informed, who was my urologist, but also the special intonations in doctor"s voice have forced to assume that the bias of "psychiatric insinuations" (to which I began to be exposed in medical institutions since 2012) is somehow connected with doctor Morris (whose patient I became in June or July, 2012, or a bit earlier).


I managed to obtain Dr. Semret"s report, and found such statements in doctor"s writings:


"Bizarre thoughts, R/O Delusional State, currently calm and cooperative no suicidal ideas.

(...) skin tag. Psychiatric evaluation? To (...) with dr. Rohan (...) whether this is a new state or a stable psychosis". [See the whole record with the supported medical documents in the next book: Book 7, Soviet-style Silencing the Dissidents by a Mental-Health Defamation.]


Clearly, it is an obvious violation of the most fundamental medical code. An infectologist had no rights to produce any psychiatric insinuations, especially when having no patient"s consent. Another question is if there was a criminal misconduct, but this is a domain of the jurists.


However, Dr. Semret not just violated the most fundamental medical ethics, but also exploited deceptive conclusions, because there were absolutely no indications for such a bizarre statement. I did not share with Dr. Semret any "bizarre thoughts", nor manifested so called "delusional state" or "stable psychosis". The insinuation that I, allegedly, said anything like "Worried he is getting infected by people seeing to harm him": was a pure lie. It was obviously related to the events in St.-Mary"s hospital"s Emergency Room (7 Jan 2013), when I came there because of a serious sickness attack with vomiting, unusually strong vertigo, 13 thousands leucocytes, and other symptoms, and suggested to the triage nurse that I could be poisoned. Interestingly, there were no mentions of my suggestion in the official ER documents, but it looks like it was marked somewhere, and this "classified" information became available to Dr. Makeda Semret. Theoretically, another possibility is that Dr. Semret"s phrase "Worried he is getting infected by people seeing to harm him" could be based on my Web publications, but if even so, it was a lie anyway, because distorted the general sense of my statements. Another question is how and why Dr. M. Semret, who does not know Russian, could have an idea about the content of my publications in Russian language. [See more details, with the supported medical documents, in: Book 7, Soviet-style Silencing the Dissidents by a Mental-Health Defamation.]


CHAPTER 8


Let"s summarize the main events of 2013:

1) a) Strongest vertigo (7 Jan. 2013), with vomiting, diarrhea, improbably plentiful cold sweat (I had replaced 3 shirts and wiped it out several times by 2 bathing towels), strongest weakness, fever, later a headache, etc.; 13 thousand leucocytes; low thrombocytes; nearly 11 thousand neutrophils (#NE), and other indicators of a sharp infection or an exposure to radiation; 5.7 glucose. 13 thousand leucocytes" most probable causes: a blood cancer, or a reaction of an infection, poison, radiation. b) The low indicator of MPV - thrombocytes" deficiency - reflects a sharp nephritic insufficiency (when kidneys have failed), or a blood cancer, or a widely spread infection, either poisoning with poisons, or a life-threatening dose of radiation. c) The high indicator of neutrophils can mean: I) sharp infection / inflammation; II) necrosis (at a heart attack); III) blood cancer; IV) severe poisonings with poisons; V) life-threatening level of this or that radiation. According to the academic sources, a combination of these 3 indicators points to a very probable radiation of any type, and, in particular, to radiation by radio frequencies waves. Especially it is necessary to notice that increased leukocytosis (even 11-12 thousand) needs an immediate, urgent attention of doctors, urgent medical examination, and assessing of the patient under continuous supervision at least for some months, but the leukocytosis OVER 12 THOUSAND: it is an emergency situation, which is demanding a medical attention not less, than a stroke or a heart attack. And I was "thrown out" with it and with other dangerous indicators from St.-Mary"s Emergency Room, having sent home without any warning about 13 thousand leucocytes.

2) Another urological infection (28 Jan. 2013). On the same day (January 28, 2013) I came to a walk-in clinic, which works 7 days in a week from 8.00 in the morning to 18.00 (if I am not mistaken). I was given a course of antibiotics. It helped immediately, and the relief came very soon. But the causative agent of the infection is not known again. My request for a "swab test": have been refused again.

3) These health issues have coincided (January - November, 2013) with the gastroenterological, dermatological, and other problems. I waited many months (sometimes: more then 1,5 year) to address the multiple health issues to the medical specialists, and few appointments were scheduled for the months of September-October. Among 3 doctors whom I have visited on October 22, 2013 (police - as usually during this period - "escorted" me till the entrance door of all 3 medical institutions), there was also a gastroenterologist. (See the details above). Doctor Szego has found some disturbing developments in the urological system, and issued a pelvic ultrasound, as well a reference to Royal Victoria Hospital's urologist. I brought this reference paper to the central secretary of the gastroenterology office, and - she (in my presence) has immediately called the urological department and has sent this reference by fax there. However, I never heard from them, and was never given an appointment concerning Dr. Szego's reference. The ultrasound test, done 3 weeks later, has shown not an increase of BPE, but an essential decrease - in comparison with the previous tests, and the PSA has shown a "super-normal" (for my age) result: slightly higher than 1. This pointed to a suggestion that the BPE was not a natural somatic pathology, but the result of the denial (or untimely prescription) of antibiotics, and, because of this: the innumerous infections, recurrent abscess, and calcification. I stated this suggestion to Dr. Morris in 2013 twice, and even mentioned it in my fax messages to him, but Dr. Morris just ignored my statement.

4) Another arthritis attack, which has started in January, 2013, caused, again, a strong pain, which affects knees, elbows, hip neck bones cartilages from both sides, feet, etc. (Not at the same time, but "consecutively"). I had an appointment with Dr. Krasny, who (at my request) has referred me for MRI. Up to May 8, 2015 - I considered the MRI report (and all records concerning this MRI (the left foot) missing. When - on December 17, 2013 - I have visited Dr. Krasny, it has become clear that the official report has not arrived to the doctor, and was not found in the medical archive. In February 2014, the secretary of Doctor Ury Krasny (rheumatologist) has told that the result of MRI "has not arrived yet". [In 2015, I did another attempt to find out what exactly happened to this report, and, again, it was declared... lost. However, later in 2015 it suddenly has "materialized".] In 2013-2014 Dr. Krasny"s secretaries never received the MRI-scan [Jean-Talon Hospital (October 16, 2013)] rapport, and, on my official request, both Royal Victoria"s and Jean-Talon"s medical archives responded that it was not present there as well. However - when (in April 2015) I have contacted Dr. Krasny"s secretary, she argued that saw it recently in my medical file (chart), but has refused to provide a copy. By the official documents, the MRI reading (the report) was ready only in the middle of January, 2014, while I passed this procedure on October 16, 2013. (It is not surprising that I have not found it in hospital"s archive 9 or 10 of January, 2014). I never heard from anybody that an MRI result (report, rapport) was ready only in nearly 3 months! However, I suggest that the official papers have been forged, and in reality the MRI result was prepared and registered at Jean-Talon-s hospital only in April, 2015, but dated by a forged date as if was ready in 2014. When I had an appointment with Dr. Krasny on April 21, 2015, I have found out that my whole [former] voluminous medical file has completely disappeared, and does not exist any more. When another arthritis attack has hit me, and lasted from November 2014 to the end of May 2015, I have decided to try the luck once again with, and made just another attempt to detect this official report, and called Dr. Krasny"s secretary. Strangely, an access to this report was blocked for me categorically by the office of Doctor Krasny (on the secretary"s level). Then I went again to the hospital"s archive. On May 8, 2015, when I finally, recovered this MRI, my trip to the hospital was accompanied by the most massive police surveillance and escort in months.

5) On December 5, 2013, at 16.30, I had an appointment with Dr. Morris. Due to the next grave infection, he was forced to prescribe for me the Alfuzosin and Cyipro (antibiotic) [on my persistent demands], but has once again refused the referral for the tests and for the special tests for Reuters" syndrome. Thus, instead of a treatment of a particular disease, the treatment of the complications was issued, which - in the absence of any diagnosis - will not help for a long time. Alfuzosin caused serious side effects in me (palpitation, disorientation, affected the coordination of movements, etc.), but - when Dr. Morris was prescribing this medication - he has not wished to listen to my objections - and to replace it by Flomax. Having the side effects, I, nevertheless, did not call Dr. Morris [to ask him to replace Alfuzosin by Flomax] - because of his aversion for me, and his aggressive reaction to any of my calls, - I have not decided to call it(him) and simply stopped taking Alfuzosin... This led to another blow to my health and later triggered the most striking health drama.

6) I already mentioned about the side effects from Septra (the antibiotic). So, meanwhile, most of the complications, caused by this antibiotic"s side effects (and their consequences), have disappeared, except of the problems with breathing. I cannot define whether they were by pulmonologic, neurologic or cardiovascular nature, and, in particular, with the heart rhythm. I turned to several doctors, but was denied a referral for a cardiogram.

7) The appointment with my family doctor had to take place (as was scheduled) on December 16, 2013 (at 15:30), but his secretary called me at 10:00 in the morning, and asked to come at 13:00. It was very uncomfortable for me, but I said: OK. To justify her request, the secretary explained that many elderly patients supposedly would not show up due to the bitter frost and snowfall, so, the doctor is planning to leave earlier. However, when I got there, there sat, besides him, a stranger - a younger woman (but not absolutely in a "student's" age), who looked rather like a police officer, but not like a student of university"s medical faculty. During the conversation, it became clear that she is poorly guided in medicine for a student specializing as a therapist (even in the simplest, elementary things). She did not know the adequate medical terminology, and was not able even to measure the blood pressure. It became clear that the secretary has deceived me again: because - obviously - I was asked to come earlier just because they wanted to adjust my family doctor"s schedule to the schedule of this female stranger, otherwise they would not be able to see me together. This mysterious visitor was not a medical student for sure, and hardly was related to "family" medicine. By her behavior, speech, reactions, accents, and questions, she could be a forensic (police) psychologist or a psychiatrist, or a police officer, or a social worker. The face of this "student" was obviously familiar to me. I try not to be biased and yet I cannot get off an impression that I saw this woman driving a police car. It is possible that she is really a policewomen, a social worker, or a psychiatrist connected to police. [By then the official report of doctor Semret did not fall yet into my hands (this happened only in July, 2014), and, still, describing the fresh facts on an outline of fresh events, I - after all - was not mistaken, and unmistakably guessed that she was a forensic psychiatrist (a medico-legal (a police officer). But, I think, this visitor was not just an expert-psychiatrist, and, is not excluded, the and therefore so obviously looked like "Aryans" of "Nordic type" - just as from movies "about war".] So, it is obvious that - on the basis of false (and illegal) Dr. Semret's "report" - Dr. Rohan's office arranged an illegal psychological or psychiatric expertise, without my written or verbal consent, and without having informed either me, or my relatives. This illegal forensic psychiatric expertise (a police psychiatric interrogation) was carried out without my knowledge, consent, or authorization, and without informing me - who is in reality the visitor of Dr. Rohan. I don't want to discuss Dr. Rohan's role in this dirty story (maybe, he also was not informed about the real function and purpose of his visitor), but, during further communications with him (same and next year), I heard several hints, which can specify that the whole vicious circle of the "psychiatric" provocations was triggered and generated by doctor Morris. On my way to the doctor the weather did not allow me to look on sides. So, I did not manage to photograph the special Security car. It flew behind my back on a cross street in 15 seconds after my exit from Metro. I looked back accidentally at this moment - otherwise I would not see it at all. On my way back home, the police car 70-41 appeared exactly in 20 seconds after my exit from the Metro station in my area. The second police car - 15-12 - has appeared a minute later on my way home from Metro. [See more details: Book 7, Soviet-style Silencing the Dissidents by a Mental-Health Defamation; and Book 10, Police Intimidation Near the Medical Institutions.]

8) Next day, December 17, 2013, when I had an appointment with the rheumatologist - Dr. Ury Krasny - there was a medical "student", too. However, this student seemed to be a true medical student, but with a special mission. Again, no one has asked my consent. It was arranged so that, without being examined by Dr. Krasny's assistant, I would not be seen by Dr. Krasny. This student (in the brackets, or without; I am not sure) did strange things: he has forced me to undress completely (allegedly, to see the "arthritis type"), felt muscles, studied (for some unknown reasons) my head of heir, shone me from the top with a small lamp (without having answered a question why all this is necessary), etc. I suspect that this "student" could be a young psychologist or psychiatrist, who was also working with police, and been not related to rheumatology. I assume that - on 16 and 17 of December, 2013, - 2 illegal psychological or psychiatric expertise were conducted (which produced classified official reports), in the best traditions of the fascist dictatorship. Was it a coincident: that particularly on December 17, 2013, the police watched me very tightly and closely during my way to Dr. Krasny? At 14.00, the police car 15-5 was waiting near my home exactly at the time of my exit for not to be too late for this medical appointment? One minute later (17 Dec. 2013, 14.01) a known to me "chicken" car has appeared on my way to the Metro, and - at 14.04 (17 Dec. 2013) - the Canada Post car with the camera on its back (in 2-3 minutes after the "chicken" car) has emerged on my way. After spending enormously long time of waiting (for a routine appointment with the doctor), I left the McGill hospital, and the McGill University security car met me right away at 17.25 (17 Dec. 2013, 10 seconds after my exit from the hospital building), escorting me down the road to the Metro. When I arrived to my home area, the police car met me at 17.55 (17 Dec. 2013) just near my home. [See more details in the books: Book 7, Soviet-style Silencing the Dissidents by a Mental-Health Defamation; and Book 10, Police Intimidation Near the Medical Institutions.]

9) On December 19, 2013, I had new annoying skin damage: coming back home after removing snow from the balcony and the outdoor backstairs. The whole outer surface of the palms became covered by red spots, which began to be shelled later. Any friction along a severe surface of some fabric or even a contact with my own beard left abrasive bloody strips on the skin of the inflamed spots. But the worst of all was the red spot on a side surface of the left palm, which burned down and bothered me. Besides - there appeared - and did not go away - also an intolerable itching. Was it an allergic reaction to a frost (but that day the frost was not strong)? This coincided on time with 2 illegal psychiatric expertise (and with the second reading of Dr. Semret"s report) - and may relate to the stress, inflicted by them, and by police intimidation (somehow linked to politically-motivated persecutions in the medical institutions). Another factor of the predisposition to such allergic reactions is connected to innumerous recurrent urological infections, and, in last 2 years, similar cases of erubescence, accompanied by a tumor, a cyst, and skin abrasion, burning and itching, similar to a certain allergic or autoimmune response. But maybe from the very beginning this allergic or autoimmune systemic problem was provoked by persecution (and related to persecution chronic stress), and accelerated by the physical contacts with some chemical or biological substances, stressful situation (politically motivated persecutions), or the ghost effects of various illnesses and their treatments. In 4 days, the dermatitis (or something else) began to disappear (in general), except for that spot on the side surface of the left palm. Unlike others - reminding diathesis - spots, this spot was slightly elevated and slightly rough to the touch.

10) On the same day on December 19, 2013, at 23:45 - the police car 72-3 (a pickup - supervisor) watched our arrival to our oldest daughter's home; and at 00:15 - a 4-doors Toyota J53 DHS diligently tracked me down, in an explicit coordination with police. On December 22, 2013 (14.22) the police car 15-12 appeared in 2 seconds after my exit from Metro: on my way home from the doctor. 25 Dec. 2013, at 08.38 (it could be - 07:38 a.m.: because the time setting in my photo-camera has glitched once again): the police was tracking me constantly. Since December 23, 2013, the police have disappeared from my way, which I link not with the cancellation of the surveillance, but with the holidays of Catholic Christmas. Instead of the police cars, I was observed by the cars of different security polices and security firms. One of such vehicles was Ford - A0905L, with letters and digits onboard - FB2911 (almost FBI), - which has turned to the street leading to the hospital where we went (to Emergency Room), for couple of seconds before us, and stopped after the turn, (this position allowed to see who is sitting inside our car). Before the turn, this Ford just stood before the street lights (waiting for us?).

11) At my age, even a very healthy person can get sick, and being in need of the medical care. But it is quite possible that - in general - I should not have seen doctors if not the stressful persecution by police; mockeries and persecution in medical institutions; not "accidents" (or incidents?) - when I was hit by cars, attacked by "unknown hooligans"; and if not all sorts of provocations, and other similar incidents. If I was given (once at least) an adequate medical care, if the diagnoses and medical tests would not be hidden from me, and if the medical professionals would not be engaged in the sabotage of the medical treatment, I should not have "strained" the medical system...

12) The medical archive refused (again!) a copy of a recently made test, which was crucial for tomorrow's appointment with the doctor-specialist. Then I went to my family doctor"s secretary who also refused me a copy of the same test (which was already received from the laboratory). I had pay a visit to the arbitration office, to call a lawyer - and, after all, - received a copy [with a fight (I photographed the printout by my mini- camera)] from the same family doctor"s secretary (who has already received a call). However, I paid attention that she pulled out the page of the "original" not from the folder of my file (chart), but from the printer, and understood the authentic printout could be already replaced while I walked there and back.

13) Approximately, since November 30, 2013, I began to feel again that "I have a heart" (pain behind the breast). At the same time, there was tachycardia - one more "bad sign". However, I considered these symptoms not related directly to the cardiological problems.

14) Much more seriously I took the pricking pains in a right side, in the intestines - in so-called right lower "square". It can be connected to the old appendix scar (left from childhood), or something in the Hepatic flexure, or in the small guts (by the unwritten medical rule, everything that hurts in the right lower square, is considered appendicitis until proved otherwise). Therefore, only in the second queue it is possible to suspect some problem of the urinary bladder. Besides, a momentary (and immediately disappearing) pricking pain arises in case of the body position change (when the guts or their contents displace - as it is well known to any surgeon), or when something "hums" "in the stomach" (which has almost never happened before). So, on the 1-st place - are the vascular problems of the intestines. The ureter is further and ureteralgias has other nature. The same can be told also about a gall bladder. Hernia apparently can be excluded, too: there are neither general, nor particular symptoms, nor detection in case of palpation.


CHAPTER 9


Having spent at home nearly 2 months with a toe fracture, by April 25 I already began to get out slowly outside, though still moved with huge difficulties. Not only that an intolerable pain began when walking; the toe "did not fit" in any footwear after the fracture, and I was walking as on a prosthesis.


Nevertheless, dozens of procedures and alternative medicine's recipes (which I used for returning the normal form and elasticity to the finger, and to heal the injury) already began to yield the results by the end of April 2014. I worked out the finger to return flexibility by means of recommended exercises - in the water and without it; I used a "miracle cream"; I took calcium with minerals.


I made a special clutch, prepared at first of a pressboard, then of plastic offcuts, which dressed on the damaged finger, walked up and down with it on the house for hours, and dressed another clutch for the night.


Since May 2, 2014, I began to ride my bike again.


On April 28, 2014, I was suddenly called by our good acquaintance, the piano class teacher of the local conservatory (musical faculty of McGill University). (She and her husband [who once won the international contest of Michelangeli (among teachers of conservatories)] taught my daughter before her studies at the musical school (college), and then consulted her till her studies at the musical faculty of the University of Montreal).


She told that there is an opportunity to bring one of my works to the judgment of the audience, but - for this purpose - it is necessary to do an arrangement of one of its parts for the symphonic orchestra, and then it will be played by her pupil with the orchestra.


The arrangement was relatively small; and, besides, extremely simple and easy, but it was necessary to remake the written repeatedly (because of misunderstanding, and then in connection with the new requirements, which arose in the course of the rehearsals).


I tried as hard as I could though my proceeding was complicated by the failures of low-power computers, which "pulled" the musical program with a big strain; by failures of the program, and by my own phenomenal absent-mindedness, and the whole swarm of other problems.


So, it became necessary to bring the music notes (scores) to her repeatedly with the corrections - all new and again new versions, and - several times - I carried them by bicycle.


As soon as I used to come to arrangement's consumer, a car of the private security agency Garda, or a police car immediately appeared at the opposite (to windows of her huge apartment) side of the street.


For example, on May 4, 2014, the police car 72-86 approached in a couple of minutes (approximately at 18.05), and remained on the opposite side approximately till 18:23 (I had to wait while she was busy with her pupils).


As soon as I went outside through the entrance, the police immediately dashed away.


The same police car spied on me on September 21, 2010 (00.05); May 22, 2011 (16.00); October 4, 2012 (14.08); and January 22, 2013 (12.29).


(Police car 72-86 at the house of the pianist. See the photo below).


My trips by bicycle during my work over these musical arrangements also monitored the private police or intelligence agency cars with the letters FGX on their license number tables (plates).


My trips by bicycle to very long ranges could signal the "observers" that I have recovered from the fracture and in a good shape again.


It is important to mark that - while I stayed at home (without budging from the place) and healed the fracture, - all 2 months no other diseases disturbed me (except strange headaches described above). 2-3 days a small cold occurred, which was not surprising: I put the ice all the time, and walked barefoot on the icy floor.


On May 15, 2014, I called Yu., whom I "did not disturb" many months.


As I described above, almost each walk with him has provoked dizziness, or some other disturbing symptoms. When walks with him became rare, even stranger (and more dangerous) manifestations and symptoms began to appear after them.


When we met nearly every day, it was difficult to connect these conditions with him, but, the less often we met, the more clearly the dependence between our joint pastime and these conditions was shown.


Several examples explicitly are described in this series of articles. (See above and below in this book as well).


For the reason, which I will not to name, there was a need to call him.


When, on May 15, 2014, we spoke by phone, he immediately expressed a desire to meet me, but it was not included into my intentions.


I was afraid that, after a walk with him, something could happen once again, and decided to restrict the communication with him to the conversations by phone. He knew, why I avoid to meet him face to face. Nevertheless, he began to insist on joint walk busily from the first telephone replies.


Somehow, he managed to convince me, but, when we had to call each other about the time and place, he, for some reason, did not call me, and I did not call back, too, reasonably avoiding meeting him face to face. However, our telephone conversations continued, and, as I mentioned above, one day there was a practical reason to contact him.


By my call, I woke him, and he answered half-asleep at first, and, in 10 years having well studied his intonations, psychology, and habits, I was sure that he does not pretend to be sleepy. (I suggested calling back later, but he insisted on talk continuation).


When I told him about the r. leg"s toe"s fracture, he said that he already knows about it. He said this half asleep, automatically, so, this could not be deception or an empty scoffing.


I asked him from where he knows it. He told that from me. I answered that since March 3, 2014, when I received the fracture, we did not communicate. Then he said that in that case he learned about it from someone else. But just Oleg was an only person in Montreal, who was informed (a musician [he, Eric Lantier, and Sierra - recorded with me my latest English album]).


Except of the members of my close family (my wife, and my daughters), nobody else, except Oleg, was informed about my another tragic incident.


So, I asked Yu. - from whom else he could learn about my fracture. He told that, if I did not speak to him since the fracture happened, so probably, I told Oleg, and Oleg - told him.


Everything looked absolutely logical and probable. It looked that all questions disappeared by themselves.


Still, I phoned to Oleg, and, during our conversation, as kind of "by the way" - took an interest whether he communicated with Yu. long ago, and whether he knows, how Yu. is doing. Oleg reported that he did not see Yu. and did not call him at least 2 months, and added that he knows about it absolutely precisely because last time they communicated in April, concerning any significant event, and since then never exchanged calls and did not meet.


So, if Yu. told the truth (and I have no doubts about it), and he already knew about the fracture from somewhere, then it pushes on interesting speculations.


In connection with these "interesting speculations", I intentionally told him on the phone that those who set the trauma (the fracture) will pay dearly for it.


Approximately, on May 17, 2014, we exchanged the phone calls with Yu. again.


As I already wrote above, at that moment nothing was hurting, any health problems did not disturb me; the headaches stopped as soon as on May 7 I received another batch of tablets.


I absolutely did not wish that something should begin to ache again and that - after a next walk with Yu. - I'll should have to see doctors.


Therefore, I refused to see him, and tried to evade from a meeting in every possible way.


And, yet, he managed to finish me on a joint walk in the neighborhood, which is not really far away from mine. He (after all) is rather a famous and skilled theatrical and film director, even if an "ex-", and well trained professionally in the technique of arrangements, suggestions, manipulating people, and in psychological influence.


[There is one more detail, which evaded my attention by then. This was Yu.'s hints about potential listening device or a hidden camera, installed in my apartment: if his subjects WERE real hints, and not the coincidental similarities. For example, he said once that some people are not smart enough for understanding how to make proper photos through window blends. In those days, I was photographing police cars "on duty" under my windows, and perceived his words as a hint about a closer surveillance, which can be performed via a hidden camera placed on the opposite building, or on a pole. Another day, he said that he is hearing cat"s miaow in my home. However, the neighbors" cat, which used to climb to our balcony, was outside - near the kitchen (which is situated at the opposite side of the long apartment) - and I was speaking with Yu. from the bedroom. Besides, the door to the bedroom was closed, as well as the window in the kitchen and the balcony door nearby. In my opinion, he could not hear the cat in no way.

In many other occasions, he was also telling me that he can hear this or that noise or sound in my apartment, which he could not catch via my old phone (when I called home, while my hearing was not damaged yet, and my wife answered, I could not hear any sounds besides her voice).

Once I was standing in front of the kitchen window looking to the backyard, and Yu. has asked me if I am standing in front of the window looking into the backyard.

Of course, someone could argue that he has some kind of paranormal gifts, or that he is capable to use sophisticated psychology technique to conclude (for example) from my voice intonations and my mood that I am standing in front of the window (in front of the beautiful view). However, an only sane explanation, if to exclude all kind of semi-fantastic assumptions, is that he has a real-time access to a listening device or a hidden camera in my apartment. This can be, for example, my wife"s Smartphone (which, theoretically, is able to initialize the microphone and to transmit somewhere the sounds even if closed).

Another question is whether Yu. was informing me about a closer surveillance on his own initiative, but I think that, if we can take the hypothesis about Yu."s hints seriously, he did it within his masters" intimidation tactics.]


I will add another important fact (to all the previous).


After a break in several months (apart from nearly 2 months, during which I desperately stayed at home because of the toe fracture) the police shadowing and escorting recommenced.


It occurred on May 1-st and 9-th, 2014 (on May 9, 2014 - a sharp intensification of the police surveillance) that also cannot be accidental (1-st May is the International Workers" Day; 9-th May is the Victory Day (victory over fascism) Holiday in Russia). The Nazis have intentionally demonstrated that they set the police on me.


What fascists they are by their origins and on their pseudo-ethnic identification - it is not so important. If yesterday the separated Nazis were at enmity with each other, today they integrate, and act together.


[As for the symbolic - everything is much more difficult, because May 1: not only "a holiday of workers", but also someone and something else (educated people know, what I am talking about), but the probable emblematic incorporates all these values.]


When in the evening, May 18, 2014, at 21:45, Yu. called me, and my wife (on our car) gave me a lift to the rendezvous point, I was already by then densely surround by the police cars, which jumped out literally one by one.


During our walk with Yu., the patrol cars took off literally from behind each corner as mad, and it is hardly possible to call this a coincidence.


Yu."s son, Dmitry, was recently assigned the director of the information department of the main television channel of one puppet regime, and it is already a potential communication between Yu. - and hidden "politicization" of his relation to ongoing events.


Dmitry is also the director of one of the media holdings, and a political strategist - in whose "honesty" huge amounts of money are invested. He is the most "gray horse" among the national politicians of his country.


Playing a role of the "most decent" person, he in practice actually "threw" (betrayed) A.G., who, really, is the most decent country"s politician (if this determination is applicable to politics).


He resorted to the Nechayev"s terrorist trick, having invented a party, which does not exist, and provided a tribune to local social nationalists in the newspaper issued by this non-existing party.


His balancing between an extreme racism (Nazism) and a moderate anti-fascism is too masterly to believe in its naturalness and independence.


Not accidentally he or his "sponsors" and masters - removed (from Internet and from the libraries) the whole archive of his newspaper, all information about him (besides the EXTREMELY avaricious semi-official), all potential compromising evidence, all thousands of his articles and materials in dozens of newspapers and on hundreds of web-sites, all the bonds with Israel and Zionism, the whole huge library of his own journalistic materials, except for only few of his very short essays. It means, firstly, that there was something, which HAD to be removed, and, secondly, that only the largest intelligence agencies are capable to perform such an operation...


While we walked, Yu., unexpectedly, started a conversation about the way the intelligence agencies hire people, and that this terrible and bloody servitude is staying on already for the rest of the life.


He cited (as an example) the novels by an English writer Kennan (whose books I did not read), and told that it was especially brightly described by this author.


He added that the intelligence agencies shall tie a person by blood, and, as a rule, it is not an execution of some attempt, not beating, not zoom-in or a set-up casualty that a victim should being mutilated but a real murder.


And then, he repeated, it already forever, for the rest of the life.


And in Kennan"s novels (if I correctly remembered this author"s surname), told Yu., as well as in the real life: everything comes to a very bad end.


When I accompanied him to the metro station, he, despite the late hour and a risk to be late for the transfer line, stopped to smoke and "detained" me, already set to walk back home.


I still strived to leave, through an intuitive enlightenment suspecting some dirty trick of this performance, or seeing a theoretical possibility of some dirty trick in this situation.


In my friend"s intonations and gestures also seemed something artificial, affected, and I determinedly resolved to leave.


At that moment, understanding that it is not possible to hold me there any more, delaying my determination to leave, my friend quickly got an iPhone (one of latest models) from his inside pocket, and brought to my face. I instinctively started back, and (to disguise the [whether a fright, whether any other "inadequate" reaction] told that I do not want him to photograph me.


His response was inadequate for this person because he told that, really, it is a camera-phone, in which there are 2 lenses, both in rare, and in front, and that it is "dangerous" - "same as Samsung". [Several times, I demanded repeatedly that he should not photograph me and not flash the phone"s screen into my eyes. He violated his promises several times, but in the last month before my injuries kept his word. And, when meeting him today, I reminded to him his commission not to take out his phone without any essential reason.]


Then I understood that the camera was pulled out not for of photographing me secretly (that he loves very much to do).


Then for what purpose?


The whole scene with the cigarettes and conversation at metro"s entrance was obviously arranged with some special intention.


With this riddle in my head, I left.


At home, left foot"s bone suddenly terribly ached, in that place where the horizontal external bone (departing from the smallest toe) meets another one, the "vertical" bone. The pain was such as if I had a fracture in that place.


Still on my way home, I marked the reddish flashouts in the right eye and so-called "floating objects".


When I turned on the computer and began to look at the screen, was a whole network of "motes" and "moles" appeared there in the right corner of the right eye, and each head turn was accompanied by red flashout on the eye circuit.


There was - no doubt - the vitreous body detachment: in incomplete 7 months after it happened to the left eye.


In the following days, the situation with has worsened whereas the left foot pain has completely passed.


If the vitreous body detachment in the left eye took place about 5 days, and then the vision has stabilized (and no new "veils", "motes", and "floating objects" appeared any more) then it was different with the right eye. First, the deterioration lasted 9-14 days, and, secondly, was followed by the additional phenomena and symptoms.


I will describe all symptoms in their stages.


1. Floating objects: "makers", "front sights", "motes", "other motes", "veils", "networks".

2. Flashouts in case of turning the head.

3. Sharp pain - a spasm for 1-2 seconds in the right temple: as though a rapid sudden appearance of a painful strip?

4. If I closed the right eye, the largest dark "mote" did not disappear (this did not happen with the left eye).

5. When I closed the right eye, in I saw in the Right Sector the light zigzag-form "lightings"-lines, which was remaining for a long time. They depart from a certain point in the upper part of the Right Sector, forming a slanted pyramid.


A serious deterioration happened after I was once again stopped and interrogated by police.


I describe the circumstances of this interception and interrogation in the special addition of the "selected" in a separate section. Here is this event in brief:


On May 22, 2014, about 1:10 at night (in the morning (a.m.), when I did a promenade around my home before going to bed, was I once again stopped and interrogated by police officers (police car 15-1).


As well as in any of the previous situations, no reason or justification for this interception and interrogation was given.


It is obvious that, since my exit from home, the police monitored me, obtaining information on my movements from somewhere, and then - received an order to stop me at a particular moment. At 1-st glance, I was so worried about the next health deterioration that this incident did not frightened or upset me too much. However, the stress could be strong enough for bringing me down and causing the irreversible damage to my eyes through possible IOP jump (caused by the stress). On the other hand, the policemen (who were holding me at the center of the road beside the police vehicle) have flashed into my face by a flashlight, and this also could make the vitreous body detachment much worse.


In the same night (May 22, 2014), the following symptoms appeared (in addition to already mentioned above):


6. A dark object like a bent nail or "worm" that changes its form in case of eye globe"s turning. If I looked to the right, this object was "bent" to the right, but once you made a look to the left, it "became straight" and "thickened", taking already another form.

7. Black "hollows" of triangular shape turned down as "notches" or concaves on an old mirror. The first appeared at morning after the stopping and interrogation by police on May 22, and in the subsequent days - their number increased. Because of all these objects, the right eye could hardly focus a look - as happens when it is impossible to set a camera"s "sharpness" at external objects through a glass covered with water droplets.

8. When the right eye looked to a limit to the left, a peckled "reticulum" was gradually formed between its junctions on the extreme right periphery.

9. If, after vitreous body detachment in the left eye, all these "veils", "motes", or "clouds" were visible only when you look against the light, or at a light surface, then in the right eye several "hollows", "points", and, the main thing, an opaque black object in the form of the bent tack: were visible even in poorly illuminated location.


On May 27, 2014, I went to eye clinic Ophtalmo Oust.


I exited from the Metro at 15.40, and, exactly in a minute, the police car 71-5 slowly passed by. (The same police car "waited" near the building - where this ophthalmologic clinic is located, - and dashed away - "second per second" - as soon as I entered the Metro).


I was examined by the same elderly doctor, Pierre Brais. This time he even more expressly showed his ironic and mistrustful attitude. His behavior was even more guarding than in the previous time - at the beginning of November 2013. He unexpectedly continued the same strange polemic, which he begun last time, though during his tirades I did not utter words. Without any provocation for my part, he tried to prove (to me) the following (as though the opposite to my alleged statements, but nothing was stated by me!):


1. The vitreous body detachment (VBD) comes "from an old age".

2. The VBD happens nearly in every second person after 50.

3. The VBD is not connected to the risk of retina"s detachment, and vision"s deterioration or blindness.

4. When VBD - "lightings" (sparks, or flashouts) happen in all humans: it is "normal".

5. The "floating objects" (points, "front sights", spots, other): these are traces, drips from the "refluxing" of the vitreous body"s gel on the retina.

6. The VBD (its complications" effects) cannot be facilitate / removed: any treatment does not exist.

7. The VBD cannot be provoked "artificially" (if it would be someone's "malicious intent").

8. The VBD is not connected to glaucoma and cataract in any way, and does not testify about the danger of developing these pathologies.

9. The clinic does not give doctor"s resume. (A question of whether there is a development of glaucoma and cataract in my eyes, was left without any response.

10. I, allegedly, have no retina"s detachment, and the intraocular pressure is "normal".


The receipt from the ophthalmologic clinic, May 27, 2014, 16:22.


The 2-nd receipt from the same ophthalmologic clinic, also issued on May 27, 2014, but already with a different time. Which one of 2 of them is "authentic"?


He told me absolutely the same the last time (in 2013), when I was examined by him with the VBD in the left eye; the single difference is that by then he spoke mostly English, and now exclusively in French.


I will repeat that I stated nothing, did not "share" any of my suspicions, approved nothing, and did not demand anything.


Whether can be that this doctor, Pierre Brais, somehow learned about my suspicions, and now polemized with me just because objected to my statements stated in this series of articles?


First, how a French Montreal ophthalmologist could come across my essays in Russian and why? In my opinion, it is from an area of a fantasy.

Secondly, he does not know Russian. There will be dozens of other similar "?" - ....


But, in that case, how to explain his polemic monologue, in any way non-provoked by the dialog?


Someone shall report to Dr. Pierre Brais something about me that the polemic could intrude into the conversation during the medical exam.


But there is more to come. Even if the ophthalmologist would also know something about me, it does not mean yet that he would begin to discuss with me my suspicions and accusations, and, especially, to refute them. Moreover, such turn is absolutely improbable.


As for the "counterarguments", he consciously palmed off on me incorrect postulates. I. e., he intentionally approved everything "on the contrary": certainly incorrect things.


Contrary to his statements:


1. "On an old age" vitreous body detachment (VBD) does not happen, just with age the risk (the probability) increases. The age ontogenesis (with its specific manifestations of the aging of the vitreous body after 40 - 45) shows itself in the biochemical and cellular, and molecular degradation of its composition and structure. However, it does not lead - in itself - to the destruction ("detachment") of the vitreous body, but occurs on a row of somatic factors: because of an increased intraocular pressure, retinoshizis, injury, rupture of some vasculum, an idiopathic macular gap, a severe shortsightedness with an eyeglobe deformation, diabetes mellitus, larvae toxocar in the vitreous, uveites, etc. (What could be the most probable causes in my case are: an injury as a result of radiation, an infection, or a closed-angle syndrome and the building of the intraocular pressure).

Accessory ("collateral") factors are: a breakdown of hemostasis, an entophthalmia (an eye infection because of an injury or after a surgical operation), etc. In other words, the concrete physic-biological reasons are necessary.


2. This problem is not "en mass" as Dr. Brais claimed. The VBD (destruction) happens in 5-12 people on each 100 thousand of human population. That is, its probability is scanty. The VBD happens in women for 60 percent more often than in men, and for 70 percent more often - in people with a severe shortsightedness.

After that, there are (as a health risk) diabetes mellitus, intraocular pressure, eye injuries, eye surgery, etc.

Having attentively studied remaining health risks according to special medical books (doctoral dissertations and scientific medical literature), I came to a conclusion that the VBD could not occurred in me at all, or only if the IOP (the intraocular pressure) jumps up from time to time. However, both the doctor in St-Mary's hospital's eye-clinic, and the same Dr. Brais (twice): claimed that my intraocular pressure is "normal". [Though in St.-Mary's hospital's eye clinic the doctor said that - by then - my intraocular pressure was 20, and this is a boundary indication, which must be treated definitely and immediately. Still, formally, 20 (even if so, and 21 is higher than the norm) is within the normal range.].

Or they told a lie?

As for the blood pressure, its day-to-day variations fluctuate from 120х80 to 110х60, in spite of a minimal dose of the tablets controlling it.


3. The VBD can lead to very serious effects, up to a total blindness.

In any place of detaching of the vitreous attachment to retina, a "tear" can be formed through which the VB gel gets under retina and peels it off from an underlying epithelium. The VBD can result in dozens of other effects menacing the vision.

In cases of incomplete VB destruction (about 26 percent of all cases), the pattern becomes even more tangled and complex, with the remote [delayed] (here is an ominous factor!) effects: tears and epimacular diaphragms in retina, etc.

An incomplete "detachment" (destruction) - roughly - does not happen (as a rule) in people older than 29-35, and at my age (near 60) practically incomprehensible.

And it is just my case!

All this testifies more likely in favor of am "external" factors of eyes' injury in my case (and its untreated complications), i.e. speaks about some malicious harm to my vision. It is explained in the paragraph "7" - how it is possible to cause damage to eye's vitreous by means of external manipulations.


4. Lightings, flashouts (or sparks) in both eyes do not arise at all patients who survived the VBD. On the contrary, the largest majority of patients with VBD do not have such effects. Such symptoms as "lightings"-"flashouts" (sparks) demonstrate a mechanical impact on retina causing the "irritation" of the photoreceptors. They specify a greater risk of complications' development, dangerous to eyes, and loss of vision.


5. The "floating objects" ("flying front sights", "motes", "veils") appear in the visual field not because, "refluxing on a retina", the flaking vitreous gel forms "drips" and "dirt" - as Dr. Brais claimed.

In fact, they are nothing but the particles of the suspension, which is formed after VBD.

Human's eye's vitreous consists of a special variety of the connective tissue, which does not present anywhere else in human body. It's different on functionality and origin elements are specialized cellular "models" (differons) and an intercellular substance. The last consists of the main gel, where "floats" are the "fibrillas" (fibers) of the "individually" created collagen-fibrous skeleton.

Probably, the most correct theory: it is the theory of the marrowy origin of the reticular macrophages of the vitreous, which - in the course of transformation - are changing into the hyalocytes of type A (I) of the neuroglial and neuromezenchim origin.

The intercellular substance has a fibrillar skeleton, providing a kind of a soft "skeleton" of the vitreous body: the diaphragms of up to 20-thick microns on optically void sections; the fibers of a fibrillar skeleton (larger than generally lengthwise direction"s); the oblique and longitudinal flours (less than 1 micron in the diameter) that are interwoven into the larger ones.

Fibers of a fibrillar skeleton are interwoven into mantles of the optic nerve in the disk zone, for strength.

These fibers, the dissolved collagen, and the hyaluronic acid: they compose and save the "gel", playing a role of a soft skeleton of the vitreous body.

The vitreous filling, which occupies the internal space between retina and a crystalline lens consists nearly for 97 percent of water, and only the rest - are the collagen, the hyaluronic acid, proteino-glycans, etc.

All the elements - different in firmness-hardness, composition, origin and functions - have an absolutely-identical transparency! It is like a totally transparent camera or another device, which all parts are reduced to a common denominator transparency. Thus, the healthy vitreous is absolutely transparent that turns out (results) thanks to the specifically specialized structure and molecular composition of the substances, which are making it.

In case of unfavorable factors or external actions-influences (pressures), the molecules are drawn towards the decay, fragmenting themselves with the change of the quality of vitreous" composition and volume. It is the destruction of eye"s vitreous body.

Right by then there appear (in the vitreous) the particles deprived of the optical transparency (the "suspension"), which the human eye perceives as the "motes", "floating objects", "front sights", etc.

By the way, I was misinformed about it not only by Dr. Brais, but also by Dr. Basmadjian, who examined me in eye-clinic of St-Mary's hospital, which ER department directed me to him. And I, having taken the words of these 2 ophthalmologists on trust, entered these incorrect data in the text of the previous versions of this series of articles (License to Kill).


6. A statement that there is no treatment for the VBD"s complications is false. It is a smaller, but still misinformation. There are such types of treatment as vitrectomy (a surgical removal), laser therapy, cryogenic freezing, injections of an artificial gel instead of a vitreous, and, probably, some others.

[Delaney YM, Oyinloye A, Benjamin L. "Nd: YAG vitreolysis and pars plana vitrectomy: surgical treatment for vitreousfloaters". Eye (2002) 16, 21-26; David P. Sendrowski, et al. Current treatment for vitreousfloaters. Optometry (2010) 81, 157-161; Wu-Fu Tsai, Yen-Chih Chen, Chorng-Yi Su. Treatmentof vitreous floaters with neodymium YAG laser. British Journal of Ophthalmology 1993; 77:485-488; H. Stevie Tan, Marco Mura, et al. Safety of Vitrectomy for Floaters. American Journalof Ophthalmology.].

7. In the World Health Organization"s (WHO) brochure is written that (I quote) "the rigid ultraviolet (close on spectrum to the X-ray range) is extremely dangerous to eyes due to its powerful bactericidal effect (kills all transparent cells), causing such injuries as a vitreous body detachment or a turbidity (cataract)".

In the same place are also chemicals, which do irreparable harm to the vitreous: cainov and cyanhydric acid, etc.

In the section of "Destruction of the Vitreous" (subsection "Destruction Reasons") of the brochure "Ophthalmology" (Tula, Prosrekt Lenina, 112b): an atomic irradiation or laser beams are specified (among "additional factors" under number 18) baking plate). It is told about the same in many brochures on ophthalmology (see: Tui Chen, PVD: Risk Factors, Ophthalmology College Press; About PVD, Vancouver Ophthalmology, 2007; etc.). In connection with both of my cases, surprising coincidences turns out.

On October 16, 2013, I passed an MRI and X-ray scan of the foot, and - right after this procedure (since October 16 or 17) - the "detachment" (destruction) of the vitreous begun. (X-rays: it is the same atomic irradiation). In addition: before this procedure, I stated my complaints concerning an enormously huge spy-camera situated on the ceiling of the "waiting room" of the MRI unit. Who knows what rays such a camera can emit? Maybe, something equal by its effects to the rigid ultraviolet?! Moreover, the MRI procedure is accompanied by the computer-controlled steering of the mechanism of the plate - on which a patient is lying, by means of laser correction of patient's positioning. The laser beam and X-ray could probably injure my eyes (the left eye with instant effects, and right - with "postponed"). On May 18, 2014, symptoms of the "detachment" (destruction) of the vitreous appeared after my friend Yu. approached his iPhone close to my eyes, and a sharp deterioration came on May 22, 2014, after I was intercepted by police car 15-1 (and the policemen interrogated me).

Could Yu.'s iPhone emit radiation similar to rigid ultraviolet's, or to other waves, or to waves in the range of laser or microwave radiation? Could his device emit such rays even without the knowledge of the owner? This mobile phone could be Dmitry's or Dmitry B. gift. Could such a radiation get into my eyes somehow during the interrogations from the police car 15-1?

And here, both times (on November 15, 2013, when I came with the left eye, and on May 27, 2014, when I came with the right eye) Dr. Pierre Brais methodically misinformed me on all points of the vitreous body detachment (destruction). Unlike the first time, on May 27, 2014, he did not even answer my questions - whether my vision degraded in comparison with November 15, 2013; what is the intraocular pressure at the present moment; and whether are presenting other pathologies, besides the vitreous body detachment. The only thing that he told: it that there are no damages to retina. And all his refusals (to inform his patient about the findings and conclusions of his exam) - came after his very careful, long (I was in his office at least 40 minutes), and comprehensive examination by means of gonioscope, slot lamp, etc. He did not make any explanations on the fact that - unlike the consequences of the left eye's VBD, with floating objects, which appeared after the detachment, an opaque figure - like a miniscule bent hook, or a thick thread (changing its form in dependence of the sight's direction), arose in the visual field of the right eye after the vitreous' destruction, besides other floaters. This floating object is much bigger than other floaters, and obscure my vision even more.

Dr. Brais also answered nothing to my words that everything is much worse with the right eye, in comparison with the left.

The suspicious circumstances connected to the destruction of the vitreous body of the right eye do not come to an end here. So, professor Markus Omnar claims that the vitreous detachment, as a rule, happens in both eyes at the same time, and only in 1 - 3 percent cases just in one eye, but ONLY at patients of 35 - 40 years old, and not older. Another author (ophthalmologist), professor Yeon Ji, answering students' questions, claims that non-simultaneous vitreous detachment in one or in other eye happens within an interval of 1-2 weeks (at most), or in 2 months (at most). Or, in other cases, next VBD can occur in years. However, the VBD in 6 months (half a year) after it occurred in the "1-st" eye, is practically excluded (or a very unusual occurrence).


[Added in 2023: it is possible that, if I became a victim of something similar to so-called Havana-syndrome, in this case Dr. Brais was just engaged in a cover-up, being hired by the authorities exactly for this.]


In the evening, on May 28, 2014, exactly in a day after the examination in the ophthalmologic clinic, inflammation with ulcerations again started in the mouth.

On May 29, 2014, something similar - has started in a different area (later I addressed to the gastroenterologist with it).

I called doctor Morris, but, a strange thing, he (for the first time!) did not receive me in a situation of an urgency. More precisely: Dr. Morris's secretary told me that she will call back, and will tell whether the doctor will be able to receive me, but she did not call back (an additional suspicious circumstance). It proved that she was an exclusively mandatory and responsible person, and it means, in turn, that Dr. Morris ordered her not to call me back.

It is possible to read that - since May 29, 2014 - the attitude of Dr. Brian Morris towards me has radically changed. I did not find any explanations for this circumstance.

Then, on May 30, 2014, I went to my family doctor, and asked to administrate a urine test.

The result on microbiological culture was negative, but there was told (in the report) that antibiotics were found ...! Naturally, an intake of antibiotics prevents a laboratory from producing an adequate and correct result, and exactly this was mentioned: NOT that they tested a culture for determining bacteria's resistance! But they just had ill luck: I did not receive any antibiotics. And then I compared this incident with another interesting fact. When, sitting in a corridor on a chair, I waited for the queue to the laboratory, a "manager" (similar to an Armenian) in a blue dressing gown approached me, and demanded to show the check (the "number"). I asked him - why. That man, without answering my question, again demanded to show the number. I asked what will happen if I do not show it. Then, he answered, I will not be allowed in the laboratory. So, I had no choice, but to show it (taking into consideration my whole bad experience, police intimidation, and so on, I felt that I am not ready presently (psychologically) for a conflict). However, it appeared that it was not enough. The "manager" demanded from me to call myself. When I told a fictitious name, he demanded to show my plastic medical card. Here I was indignant, and said that it is confidential. He lagged behind.

Theoretically, if someone wanted to alter or replace a sample, then - to facilitate the task of such a malicious substitution or analysis' sabotage - it is easier to charge (with this task) someone from a technical personnel: so, the malefactors needed to foreknow what number I picked up, which could provide an advantage to be prepared beforehand. Not therefore whether that guy in a blue dressing gown tried so hard to identify me precisely - so that even demanded my plastic medical card?

Meanwhile, I almost definitely felt that something similar can occur. Therefore, approximately in 10 minutes after arrival (having made sure that there is no none from the staff's personnel nearby) took an extra cloakroom ticket's tag. I showed the 2-nd cloakroom check (taken later) to the "manager" in a blue dressing gown, hoping that it will confuse planning sample's replacement.

But, when I approached - with the check - to a window, the nurse-registrar - having taken from me the requisition and medical card, - gave me a yellow cardboard counter and ordered to stand in line "with yellow cards". I know that the yellow cards and the privilege to go out of turn are reserved for disabled people, expectant mothers, urgent (special) cases, etc. I did not manage to open my mouth to say that the yellow card is not for me - as the registration nurse already invited the next patient to sit down, and actually did not allow me to say anything.

This last case adds my last suspicions and observations.

Whether it is strange that, against the background of the next infection, cystitis (characteristic symptoms) and bladder pains - the urine test was surprisingly "good" exactly that time; no last deviations were recorded:


From 11 to 25 of November, 2014: a reddening has developed around my right eye; inflammation of both eyelids; burning and lachrymation.


I paid visits to 2 walk-in clinics. In both, they refused a referral to ophthalmologist and any medications. The 2-nd ("a better one") clinic only advised to "wash eyes by feeble solution of tea". (Running forward: probably, if they did not refuse me a referral to ophthalmologist, it would be diagnosed a closed-angle syndrome (and potential glaucoma) before it destroyed the optical nerve and led to a serious eye disease).


Washing eyes by a weakened tea bags extract did not help.


I was forced "to get" anti-inflammatory drops and antibiotic eye cream through acquaintances. However, it was, probably, too late, and time was already lost.


Since November 25, 2014: pain and burning in the right eye; the eye "itched" and burned incredibly... This eye was red as though inflamed.


It was impossible to get an appointment with an ophthalmologist. I went to the St.-Mary's hospital's Eye Clinic trying to obtain an appointment with just any ophthalmologist. On my requests to see a doctor and on my words that I shall be registered in this clinic, and they shall have my medical file, the secretary answered that they "have no data" on me "in the system", and that she cannot allow me to see a doctor without a referral. But, when I asked - as well - how it is possible for someone "to get" a referral, everything that I heard in reply: was silence.


Having recalled that I once got to this clinic through the emergency department of the same hospital after the vitreous body detachment, I - after all - did not go to ER: because of the systematic mockeries and innumerous refusals of any medical care in various health emergency situations. This has created a psychological barrier. [Later I received several evidences that I am persona non grata in St.-Mary's Ophthalmological Clinic.]


I remembered very good how - when having the vitreous body detachment and borderline IOP - I got a referral to this Eye Clinic "with a fight", but achieved nothing, because the eyes exam by ophthalmologist terminated fruitlessly: no treatment, no recommendations, no medical report, no prevention of further degradation of my vision and further worsening of eyes' disease; no follow ups, no diagnosis. If - even by then - I did not receive any help from the ophthalmologist, all the more now, in case of such a "foolish" problem as itching and reddening in the right eye, they would kick me out home for sure, and I will only suffer in vain in ER waiting room 4-5 or all 10-12 hours.


I had to wash an eye with feeble solution of tea and camomile infusion.


By December 6-th, 2014, the inflammation (or what it was) - began to ease.


CHAPTER 10


June 17, 2016.


Since the episode of serious side effects of Septra (antibiotic) (see in the previous chapters and books) [heart disorders, heartache, arrhythmia, tachycardia, shortage of air and breath problems, with, heart pains at the physical activities (amplifying at a deep breath), etc.)] - these complications did not go away.


On Friday, June 17, 2016, I came to St.-Mary's Emergency Room with a heart attack.


I had to go again to this hospital, in which so many provocations and troubles were arranged against me, and so many physical and psychological suffering were inflicted: because I was actually declared "persona non grata" in other hospitals.


After a number of very weird things happening in St.-Mary"s hospital, I would like to go to another hospital. However, I have been actually declared a "person non-grata" in other hospitals, because, allegedly [according to the medical staff], I should address only in St.-Mary"s. I suspected that it was something linked to Dr. Morris, who managed somehow to trigger sanctions against me in the medical institutions. When I went to Royal Victoria and MGH Emergency Rooms, they told me that I "must" go to the hospital where Dr. Morris works. So, I was forced to address to the hospital, in which I faced so many provocations and troubles that have caused so many physical and psychological sufferings.


The emergency department doctor has not managed to detect, what's wrong, but has - at least - carried out all basic tests (blood-urine tests, electrocardiogram and heart"s X-ray, the test on troponin and d-dimer).


I do not stop on details here, because, in my opinion, this doctor did everything he could in the given situation, having ordered the test on troponin and other exams' elements (blood"s coagulation, glucose, red blood cells, etc.). Not the doctor, but, rather, the hospital"s policy is responsible for the fact that, with so many abnormal results (reflected by tests) they did not appoint any follow-ups with medical specialists.


And - secondly: it is amazing, how freely and in different ways this hospital (and its laboratory) - and other hospitals - are interpreting the indicators of laboratory tests.


Should there be the same norm - at least - in Montreal (not speaking about all-Quebec and all-Canadian norms)?


For example, the Creatinine (Glomeral Filters Rate - the test for kidneys function) - is interpreted in different documents differently. The same laboratory (or laboratories of different hospitals) presents its norm one time as 90-150, another time as 89-125. This particular time the norm was given as 44-123 though it is well known that the indicator 44 is a severe kidneys disease: nephritic insufficiency.


The same concerns the test for sugar (glucose).


In one laboratory's documents the norm of glucose is indicated as 5.6, in others as 5.9, or sometimes - as 6.4, and in one of my tests - even 7. (It concerns the same "fasting glucose" indicator.) Therefore, also the borderline (especially for me, in comparison with my other tests) the Creatinine indicator, and a borderline indicator of glucose (at the most top limit) in this report are given in such a way, as though it "should be the norm".


Trying not to sound unfounded, I give (see below) an example of some of "normal" - responsible - references to the norm (see below):


As we see - in this case - the norm of Creatinine is given as 80-120.

If there were "flags" "H" --- "L" in the printout (of the laboratory report) from June 17, 2016 (St.-Mary"s ER), the doctor would, probably, has paid more attention to them, as well as to a deviation from the norm concerning the thrombotsites, blood coagulation, etc.

The blood test alone indicated unusual to me (in comparison with the majority of other results) abnormals, which was signaling about some systemic failure, an acute process.


Now, let's look into cardiograms, which detected significant changes (worsening, in comparison with the norm), which never occurred before and represented a fresh shift to pathology, certainly, caused by the urological drama and all its side effects, and, thus, directly connected to Dr. Morris's (and other doctors') medical crimes.


Below: a comparison of 2 cardiograms:


The comparison of the 2 cardiograms: from 17 Jun. 2016 (in St.-Mary"s ER; left); and from 3 May 2016 (right).


It is shocking that the name of the doctor, who appointed the cardiogram, "was lost" - and was not specified.


The policy of concealment and incompetence of doctors leads to their full irresponsibility and to lack of any control.


In this chronicle (in the records of my address to this ER), I described the discrepancy of doctors' names on their breast cards in St. Mary Hospital's emergency department - with the names specified in official reports; I reported about the substitution of names of some doctors by the names of other doctors, etc.


As the new, changed tactics of concealment and cover up of systematic medical crimes (since 2016), other tricks began to be applied already: names of the doctors examining patients during their address to ER "vanish" from the official documents. But anonymity of doctors - the same that anonymity of bandits, who are active under their gangster nicknames.


Blood test from June 17, 2016, revealed some abnormalities in blood clotting formula (bad blood clotting) and showed that the red blood cells are lower than the norm (anemia or other reasons). It is also necessary to pay attention to such indexes as glucose and creatinine.


Shockingly, the name of the doctor who administrated the cardiogram, "was lost" - and was not specified. The policy of the concealment and of doctors" conduct"s incompetence leads to their absolute irresponsibility and to the absence of any control.

In this chronicle, I described the mismatch of ER doctors" names (at St.-Mary"s hospital) on their breast cards to the names specified in the official reports" printouts; the substitution of names of some doctors by names of others, etc.

As a new (changed) tactics of concealment and cover up of systematic medical crimes, other methods (since 2016) began to be applied already: doctors" names indicated in earlier papers "disappear" from the later official documents.

But the anonymity of doctors: it is the same as the anonymity of bandits, who act under the gangster nicknames.


See the blood test rapport in ER (17 Jun. 2016) below:


The blood test (June 17, 2016). This blood test has revealed the deviations from the norm in the formula of blood coagulability (bad coagulation) and has shown that the red cells are lower then the norm (anemia or other reasons). It is necessary to pay attention also to such indicators as Glucose and Creatinine.


The blood test from June 17, 2016: abnormal coagulation and other hematological indexes, which never were marked by "abnormal" markers before. Abnormal (high) PT, INR blood coagulation; HCT ht (hemocrit); low red cells (anemia). Low creatinine (suppressed kidney function); borderline (pre-diabetic) glucose.


The combination of the blood test, which found abnormalities on very important indicators, and the cardiogram, which showed a sudden deterioration in comparison with all previous (always normal in the past) cardiograms (including 2 previous cardiograms in the same St.-Mary's Hospital; however, the comparison is absent in the present cardiogram report) - had to dictate the need for additional exams, consultations with experts, and follow ups; but no further medical actions followed. It was, probably, a more serious violation than a simple negligence.


JUNE 20, 2016, MONDAY.

My records in the computer *.rtf format have been corrupted, and this corrupted file began to show abracadabra in many places.


My memory after June 21, 2016, has weakened, and also does not throw any additional light on those events. It is concerning the question if it was possible to visit my family doctor on June 20, 2016.


It is specified in my records that at the end of June 2016, I have visited the office of my family doctor, and asked him (after my address to ER on 17 Jun. 2016) to refer me for an urgent echocardiogram, but it is unclear, whether it happened on June 20, 2016.


After my address to ER on June 17, 2016 (Friday) followed 2 weekend days, - and this became a tragic factor: because I could not address neither to a walk-in clinic, nor to my family doctor.


(I did not know by then that some of the walk-in clinics are working even on Saturdays).


However, if I visited my family doctor on June 20, 2016, with a request about the echocardiogram (which he has refused): this refusal keeps within in a row of other refusals (running forward: echocardiogram, demanded by me during 15 years, was never issued).


At the same time, it is possible to consider a number of other medical refusals, which have led to a probable micro-stroke (June 21, 2016): as one of its factors.


JUNE 21, 2016, TUESDAY.

On June 21, 2016, I came to St.-Mary"s Emergency Room with such symptoms, as confusion and the loss of orientation; short-term nasal bleeding; headache and improbably strong (maximal) vertigo; sharp hearing"s loss; difficulty of understanding human speech and to distinct the words and syllables; etc.


(The noise-hiss in the ears, vanishing for long periods before, returned, and - after June 21, 2016 - became permanent).


Hardly notable dizziness happened few times after June 2, 2016 - as one of the complications from Septra's (antibiotic) side effects, but, first, they quickly and completely vanished, and, secondly, this condition was more likely not a real dizziness, but a micro-second shaking, a shake-up, or a physical instability of balance.


In the late afternoon (Tuesday, June 21, 2016), standing in our salon (hall) before the window, I have suddenly felt at first an easy indisposition, and then more and more obvious signs of something unusual. Though the window was completely closed (the air conditioner was cooling the room), I have felt airflow - as if a breeze was literally passing through the windowpane (as if there was no barrier before me).


[In the same time, music from FM-radio (stationary Quest amplifier-FM-Radio) was interrupted by the disturbances and replaced by noise for approximately 5-7 seconds.]


Right there, I felt something like a push: like a pressure from within, from outside (from the street), and everything has begun to spin at once in my eyes.


It became difficult to breathe, and droplets of cold sweat (with, simultaneously, few droplets of blood from the nose) have appeared on my forehead.


The world around me begun to spin so wildly that I had to fall on 4 points to support myself.


As soon as I managed to crawl away from the window, I started to feel a bit better, and have lain down, but right there felt absolutely badly: my feet did not obey me; the tongue was braided; there was whistle and noise in my ears; the sounds reached me as through a pillow; I hardly distinguished human speech; in parallel - there developed the same strongest vertigo as in case of January 7, 2013, when I had a similar attack, in the same way - when I stood and sat before the same window...


By then, it happened exactly at midday (at 12.00), and it was exactly on the day of Orthodox Christmas of 2013 (the figure "13"), and everything was almost the same, except for lack of 2 or 3 symptoms, which were present now, on June 20 and 21, 2016.


[It is necessary to add that the dizziness has never occurred - till November 3, 2005 (my birthday!), when a similar incident took place, and then before a similar incident on January 7, 2013 (Orthodox Christmas!), and then till June 21, 2016, (Hitler"s Germany attacked USSR on that date!): for only one exception.


Strange disturbance of balance (accompanied by a feeling of pressure upon the face or on the nape, ringing in the ears, short-term sharp decrease in hearing, and by other symptoms) - happened several times during my walks with my friend Yu.

On August 1, 2009; June 1, 2010; August 1, 2010; June 1, 2011; July 1, 2012 - short-term dizziness, weakness, ringing in the ears, sight and hearing disturbances.

(On arrival home: a normal blood pressure (120 х 78); I was drinking enough water before the walk).

On July 2, 2012 (after yesterday's walk with Yu.): a nasal bleeding (repeated till July 4, 2012: 4 or 5 times); plentiful hematuria accompanied by bladder"s gripe (mulligrubs), with a bright red blood. On the same day: enterogastric bleeding with the same scarlet blood.]


Approximately, at 19:00, on June 21, 2016, my wife has brought me to St.-Mary's Emergency Room, and, having stayed with me some time (she has accompanied me to the office of the triage nurse, and was there with me all the time), later left (returned home) in connection with some urgent circumstances. By the time of my spouse's departure, the vertigo has become not so terrible, and I could move around (somehow), clinging and holding up at everything that could get under my hand on my way, but still with a great risk to fall and to injure myself.


When my wife has taken me to the triage office (by then, I still could not make a step without her support; everything was still spinning in a wild speed before my eyes as though I stood on a carousel), the triage nurse has chosen a rough, aggressive, accusatory tone from her first word. It was remaining a riddle: what my fault or an oversight consisted of; probably, only that I am still alive.


Though I noticed not much in my pitiful condition of that time, it seemed to me that she wrote down almost nothing from my words. This triage nurse tried to convince me (and my wife) that my unique problem consists in the nerves, and that I have (allegedly) a psychiatric problem, that's all; though she is not a doctor-psychiatrist, and had no right to declare "diagnoses" and insinuations.


It was abundantly clear that she was instructed in advance (before I came to ER) and ordered to behave with me exactly so and to carry out exactly such a line, - or she knew very well, who I am, and what conflicts with medics I had, and, not excluded, it was specified something very specific about me in my medical file that provoked her and allowed her to be so defiantly with me.


When I replied to her that the only thing that can be indirectly related to the sphere of "nerves": is a possible damage at the level of the central nervous system - as a result of a short-term ischemia, micro-stroke, or something similar (certainly, I meant under the damage of the central nervous system the traumatic injury of brain), she suddenly began to shout at me, became even more accusatory and offensive, as though having mentioned the central nervous system I have committed a serious crime. Such a behavior of the triage nurse did not foretell anything good.


But, before we left her office, she once again literally scoffed at me like a predator as though she was ready to kill me, or, at least, to slap me in the face. Whether it is surprising that I - a patient with a suspected stroke! - who needed an IMMEDIATE medical assessment - was kept 4 hours for a call to a doctor"s office (up to 23:00) though there were not so many patients that evening in ER, and 4 doctors (as minimum) were on duty?


When I have waited to be called to a doctor, the dizziness was still there, unlike a similar vertigo on January 7, 2013: when it - after the attack - has instantly stopped. To reach the doctor's room without someone's help was a difficult task. I could fall several times, and could injure myself.


I was examined by Dr. John P. Rowen. He did not want to listen to what happened (at all), instead indirectly accusing me for turning to Emergency Room "without a reason". He kept himself within the legal (permitted) borders, behaving not like the triage nurse, who attacked me for no reason almost by her fists (in other words: without explaining or justifying her aggressiveness), but his attitude was not less cruel and brutal.


I did not open my mouth yet and did not pronounced a word as Dr. Rowen already have declared that does not see any health problem - "absolutely nothing" (meaning that there is no problem, which needs a medical attention). He declared it BEFORE assessing me and without listening to my explanations (to my reasoning - why I am here); without having ordered any laboratory tests; without having checked my pulse; without having checked me on symptoms of a possible micro-stroke (and other probable scenarios), and added that I should go home, and not come any more to the Emergency Room "without a reason".


His words have literally taken away from me a speech power.

I told him that I have difficulty breathing, noise (and ringing) in my ears (which never happened before [a high sound appeared, vanished, came back from time to time before today, but the noise and hiss, and a combination of noise-ringing have never manifested before]), and a sharp decline of the hearing; that couple of hours ago I had an unbelievably strong vertigo and vomiting, and that the dizziness is stile pending now so that if I do not support myself holding the walls - I will fall; that every minute it becomes dark in my eyes; that after today"s vertigo and the sickness attack it became difficult to distinguish the syllables and whole fragments of human speech; that right after the beginning of feeling sick I almost did not feel the touches to my hands.


I added that the last cardiogram (3 May 2016) (i.e. quite recently) has shown a deviation from the norm, which never happened before in my life, etc.


I have added also that, as a result of the side effects from Septra-antibiotic (at the beginning of this June), the episodes of unusually strong palpitation followed, and that - on June 17, 2016, - I came to this Emergency Room with a suspected cardiac seizure, and this, in turn, increases a probability of an emergence of brain"s problems of vascular character.


I have not forgotten to tell also about the temperature (37 and 5 in the triage nurse"s office; 37 and 9 at home, before the departure to the hospital).


He has listened to my tirade, and asked, when has begun my present condition (at what time). I have answered that I began to feel sick (the vertigo followed then) - approximately at 16:00 or 17:00.


Then Dr. Rowen asked: what I want from him.


I replied that I demand at least all basic laboratory tests, tests for micro-stroke, short brain ischemia or a brain trauma, CT-scan (computerized tomography), and to check the carotid arteries and eyes - whether there are no signs of a traumatic damage: an abnormal intraocular pressure, a close angle syndrome, etc.; and also to examine the ears and the vestibular apparatus.


Dr. Rowen immediately attacked me for "hypochondria" (suspiciousness), angrily refused any examinations, and has declared that I do not have anything serious, except for a panic and a depression syndrome, and that he will prescribe a medicine, which "will help for all problems".


He then has written out the prescription.


However, I have told to him that even 10 years ago it was already well known that the depression increases the risk of a stroke on the average by 70 percent; that the deeper is a depression, the risk is higher. And I had specified to him that the panic syndrome and a depression do not explain headache, abnormal temperature (38 at home; 37,5 in the triage room), strongest vertigo (now replaced by a less critical dizziness), eye pains when looking at light, and other symptoms, and continued to insist on brain"s MRI or CT-scan; but Dr. Rowen responded that now, allegedly, it is necessary to wait till 8 a.m. to do the scan, but, if I want - I can come the day after tomorrow at 9:00 for CT-scan.


Seeing that he is not going to issue any medical requisition, I have reminded him that no one will do a CT-scan without a requisition from a doctor. Dr. Rowen answered that I simply should address in the reception window (without going to triage), and that "there they will be already informed". But I did not give up, and insisted on requisition, or - at least - on blood test (saying what components should be checked).


At this moment, Dr. Rowen has shown his real shark nature, threw off his mask, and said that I must leave the room immediately, and began to push me to the doorway.


I said in reply that I am no able to walk because of the dizziness, and that I am just about to fall.


He did not want to listen, has painfully taken me by the elbow, intending to throw me out from the office. During this moment, the dizziness became stronger, everything begun to spin around me, and I would fall, if have not grasped the edge of the medical couch. Everything has rotated with a wild speed again, and I was helplessly stretched on the floor, having caught the couch like an anchor. Then this moral freak has literally stepped me over - and left the office.


After pair of seconds he has returned, and nevertheless has pushed me out from the office.


When I, reeling, trudged on the corridor to the waiting room (where my wife should come for me), I only by miracle have not fallen and have not broken my bones. Supported by my wife, I have reached the car with enormous difficulties. Only the next day the dizziness has passed, but the headache and some other painful symptoms kept 2 more weeks.


Of course, Dr. Rowen had absolutely no basis to dump everything on "panic syndrome" and "depression", except of the information in my Sante Quebec file about the prescription of Ativan by my present urologist, which he used as a solely catch for the justification of a COMPLETE refusal of medical care.


Putting it differently, Dr. Rowen did not have and could not have any own medical opinion for:

1) the reasons, which have caused my condition;

2) its danger to my life and health;

3) the validity of the suspicions on brain damage (ischemia, stroke, etc.);

4) the presence of depression or "panic syndrome" (he even did not examine me and did not talk to me, declaring - figuratively speaking - from the entrance: that I should go home and not come here any more "without a reason");

5) the roles of depression or "panic syndrome" in my condition, and Ativan's ability to change anything;

6) consequences of his own behavior, his refusal for any diagnostics and medical care in general, and complications due to the absence of rehabilitation - in case if it is a stroke or a micro-stroke.


He was not concerned about his patient's well-being at all, but the only thing that worried Dr. Rowen during that moment: it was that the patient has already addressed to the same Emergency Room 4 days ago (the other doctor have not rendered any medical care by then though has carried out quite reasonable troubleshooting tests, but, however, has not finished them and has ignored abnormal laboratory results, patient"s complaints, and the absence of a clarification of the reasons of his patient"s condition (heart attack). Now - if it would become clear that the patient had any brain damage (for example, a micro-stroke) - the hospital and the doctors could have serious troubles.


So - no other motivations and intentions were on Dr. Rowen's mind, except of a cover-up and framing of his colleagues and the hospital during that moment.


Dr. Rowen, certainly, argued so (in his mind): even if the next day this patient will be taken by an Ambulance to a hospital with further developments of a stroke, and will die - then other doctors (such as himself) will begin to screen (to cover-up) him, their colleague (Der Genosse), in the same way, as he screens the others.


Then to dump everything on depression and to secure himself by prescribing Ativan (to show that he, allegedly, did at least something), and by a pseudo-appointment (deception apropos the CT-scan) - he employed just a dirty trick.


But there is one, how to put it, non-joining.


During my conversation with Dr. Rowen, I have confirmed (answering his question) that really addressed in the same ER few days ago, but (as briefly as we have discussed this subject) I have managed to give a good feedback about the doctor who assessed me. Was it, in this case, any motive for Dr. Rowe to cover-up his colleague?


2 days after I, still in a serious condition, accompanied by my wife, have somehow reached the hospital, and there it has become clear that there is no record on any tomography. Neither the secretary, nor the triage nurse knew anything. Dr. Rowen has meanly deceived me!


The actions of doctor Rowen have led to the most dramatic consequences. Just at once, having come back home from hospital, I have noticed that it became difficult to swallow (for sometimes after that, I only drank water). This additional symptom kept not less than a week. Then I often choked, when drank, doing more than 2 drinks, and often water or food got to the "windpipe", and I coughed and choked.


After June 21, 2016, I began to distinguish aurally badly some syllabic combinations, and, in general, my hearing has sharply degraded. I have ceased to understand a fluent speech. My own speech has become tongue-tied. It became difficult to concentrate on the readable content, especially with the abstract, complicated sense. I have ceased to understand the philosophical idioms, even my beloved sayings of thinkers. I have ceased to understand my favorite philosophers, including Schopenhauer, Heidegger, and Plato. Having reached till the end of philosophical thought, I did not remember any more what was in the beginning. Even my own philosophical works have become for me rebuses. The headaches, which were very seldom in me before, began to attack me every week. The nape and the temples were especially hurt.


In some days, in the last dates of June 2016, I have suddenly noticed that began to forget many even simplest words, and that my memory in general has sharply degraded. This problem began to progress more and more. I began to forget not only words and phrases, but also, for example, where I have put this or that thing, whether I have put the food in the refrigerator, etc.


My vision (which was periodically worsening, improving, and in summer of 2016 - till June 21 - much improved) has sharply degraded, especially the distant sight. Letters began to blur in 10-15 minutes of reading; eyes began to be tired and teary; floating objects have multiplied. Since June 21, 2016, the lacks of coordination of movements appeared and did not disappear; the coordination of movements did not settle into the norm, and it had nothing in common with any panic syndrome or depression.


Some days after June 21, 2016, I could not look at bright light sources.


Before 21 of June 2016, I was capable to type a text on computer keyboard, and, simultaneously, continue a conversation; listen to radio news - and read a book (at the same time); do programming in Visual Basics - and listen to an audio book. But after 21 June 2016, I discovered that I am no longer capable to sort computer files - and, simultaneously, listen to radio news; or combine simple processing of images with the simplest conversation.


Problems with breathing did not stop up to the end of August 2016, though - from time to time - as though disappeared (for example, during the time of passing of the preoperative evaluation in Lakeshore hospital). They could be connected not to psychological tension or depression (as Dr. Rowen argued), but to some damage to brain parts, which are responsible for normal breath function.


[After publishing 1-st Russian version of this chronicles [describing medical crimes] (approximately, the end of 2017 - beginning of 2019; 3 web-sites, including Maxim Mashkov and Sergei Balandin web sites), and reading over the 1-st English translation (done by my friends approximately in the end of 2019), I dig into Dr. John Patrick Rowen"s professional medical activity and spheres of interests, finding the next information.

Dr. Rowen is known as a vascular surgeon / phlebologist, who operates at Xomed Esthetics, Côte-des-Neiges (5056 Chemin de la Côte-des-Neiges, Montréal, QC H3V 1G6, tel. (514) 342-8346); Rosemère (30, boul. Bouthillier, suite 250 Rosemère, Québec, J7A 4B4); Westmount (4484, Sherbrooke West, suite 200, Westmount, Québec H3Z 1E6).

In his self-advertisement, is written:

"As a dedicated vascular surgeon/phlebologist, he specializes in the diagnosis, medical management, or surgical treatment of individuals who are suffering from diseases related to the blood vessels outside the brain and heart. He determines the types of instruments and surgical methods that will be most applicable in achieving the desired output. He also reviews the history of a patient to confirm the need for surgery.

Specialized skills in the field of medicine are very valuable these days. With the help of a vascular surgeon or a phlebologist, patients who are dealing with issues associated with the blood vessels are assisted. Among the conditions and diseases that impact the vascular system include coronary heart disease, deep vein thrombosis, arteriosclerosis, and pulmonary embolism. Surgical procedures may be implemented in order to repair damaged veins and arteries, removing blockages within these parts.

Dr. John P. Rowen is currently accepting new patients. To book an appointment, please call (514) 342-8346."


Thus, as 99 per cent of doctors, involved in deeply unethical actions IN MY CASE, Dr. Rowen is a medical businessman (entrepreneur), whose medical activity is an unseparable hybrid with money-hunting.


A bit later, I found out that Dr. Rowen was referred to as President, who literary OWNS the clinics: "Dr. John Rowen"s clinics: The Montreal and Rosemere clinics".


His BiO describe Dr. Rowen as a family doctor (in the début of his medical career (a familiar picture!):


"Dr. Rowen grew up in Montreal and was educated in French. He is completely bilingual and speaks some Italian and Spanish as well. He graduated from Queen"s University in Ontario in 1989 and completed his residency training at McGill University in 1992.

Being both an emergency physician and family doctor for 26 years, Dr. Rowen understands the needs of his patients. He has a very practical approach and a true passion for creating results for his patients.

Dr. Rowen has been practicing Phlebology and Esthetic Medicine since 2000. He has been trained by some of the best leaders in the world. He is passionate about learning and attends numerous scientific meetings per year to bring the most up-to-date treatments to his patients.

He is a Fellow of the Canadian Society of Phlebology, member of the American College of Phlebology as well as the Canadian Association of Aesthetic Medicine.

Dr. Rowen founded XO MED Esthetic in 2006. His approach is a culmination of his specialties, beliefs and passions, which sums up in providing the best state-of-the-art treatments in medical facial aesthetics and varicose vein care.

Dr. Rowen is invited to meetings all over the world where leaders in the field discuss advanced techniques. He also has a passion for anatomy and has even participated in cadaver courses, and read countless books on the subject, to enrich his practice.

"I became interested in Phlebology since I, myself, had varicose veins and was very curious to learn more about the techniques involved in treating them. It fit in well with my passion to see results. Phlebology may seem straightforward, but is harder than it looks and combines both the science and art of medicine. With the availability of better imaging modalities, the specialty has really taken off in the past 10-15 years. I am very pleased to be able to offer this life-changing expertise to my patients." (Dr. John Rowen)


Dr. Rowen wrote a medical article in 2016: A la recherche / We are looking for: By John Rowen; February 18, 2016.


However, his main target is the cosmetology for the rich people, which is reflected in his adds: "Phlebology and Medical Aesthetic clinic. Treatment of varicose veins by sclerotherapy and ultrasound guided treatment. Dermal fillers and Botulinum toxin (Botox Cosmetic) injections".


Since 1992, Dr. Rowen was listed as St.-Mary"s hospital Graphic, ER and family doctor. (Interestingly, Dr. John Lewis (see above, in connection with my 1-st posterior VBD in 2013) was also listed as "Graphic", and owned "Dr. John Lewis Inc. Graphic").


His education and status:

1) McGill University Graphic

2) Emergency Medicine Residency Program

3) Queen's University Graphic (1989 - 1992) Doctor of Medicine (M.D.)

4) American College of Phlebology (ACP) American College of Phlebology (ACP) Graphic.


One of my sources informed that Dr. Rowen might be connected to US Army, which is theoretically possible, considering that "He started his training for phlebology (varicose veins) in 2000 in the USA, and has been treating patients with injectable botox and fillers since 2004.", and that "He also has a passion for anatomy and has even participated in cadaver courses, and read countless books on the subject, to enrich his practice".


This information makes it very suggestible that such a personality as Dr. Rowen could mistreat me on the order of some very influential people for advancing his career.]


There is no doubt that I was assessed (21 Jun. 2016) by Dr. Rowen, and not by another doctor (which could be quite possible in St.-Mary Hospital"s ER - practicing misleading documentation information), because - on his photos - Dr. Rowen (who looks like a South-European or Jewish Ashkenazi man) looks exactly as the person, who abused and mistreated me at St.-Mary"s ER on 21 June 2016. (See below)


Dr. John Patrique Rowen.


After the criminal mistreatment by Dr. John Patrick Rowen, I never fully recovered from a suspected micro-stroke, which was boldly neglected and abusively ignored by Dr. Rowen. The partial recovery took months and years, and was possible only because of my body"s recovery and regenerative qualities, and thanks to my (modest) medical knowledge.


All elements of intellectual and physical degradation (so, the strength of hands has also decreased; I could not, as earlier, to turn off strongly twirled plugs; to hold a heavy bag; etc.) just impossible to list, but most of all I was upset and brought into a despair by the sharp deterioration of my vision and hearing.


My family doctor has arranged an appointment with an ophthalmologist, but - when I called him, I was told to prepare 50 dollars for the visit, which I did not have by then... Then a walk-in clinic had referred me to an ophthalmologist, but that eye clinic has blocked my access to this doctor-ophthalmologist; the correspondence with that eye clinic is given in this chronicle...


Later I have forgotten about these 2 referrals. I began to forget more and more things...


A bit later I could not continue my fight for an access to ophthalmology care in connection with medical bureaucrats" dramatic delay of the 1-st and the 2-nd urological surgery (provoked by the irresponsible actions of Dr. Morris) and the general awful situation (the ordeal with the infected bladder stones, etc.) but now - during a short time - I have absolutely forgotten about these 2 referrals, when was persistently demanding a referral to an ophthalmologist from different doctors, and was urgently needed the ophthalmologic help, remembering nothing about 2 referrals.


Also my fear of going to any Emergency Room - after all humiliations, abuses, inhuman treatments, and misconducts there - played an important role, resulted in the outcome, when an attack of a very strong pain in the left eye has not been stopped by doctors, and all its complications: it, certainly, the consequence of many months of the partial loss of memory, which was (as everything else) provoked by the actions of Dr. John Rowen. And the catastrophe with my vision, which has happened in a year after the June 21, 2016 events: (as everything else) is on Dr. Rowen"s conscience.


Whether it is surprising, that, in response to my appeal to St.-Mary"s medical archive, I received no more than 1 single page (on June 17, 2016) and no more than 2 pages (on June 21, 2016) of non-illegible records on my 2 visits to St.-Mary"s ER! Neither the reception"s registration; nor the triage nurse"s notes; nor the records of the vital functions at the triage nurse"s office (breath, blood pressure, temperature); nor the complete timetable of my visit - have been made available to me.


I have not received also other pages of the standard official report.


If they blocked or destroyed such important documents: it means that the hospital has a lot of medical crimes to hide.


"23:00... 60 y.o. went in vague...

explains

his.... vertigo/cufune(?)...

- no hit -

... thinks - it related

to bladder stones...

why O

OK VII rerle(?) last...

O Xon

thyroid O

rep clu feta

O I'm soft tube"


It is all that was possible to descramble.


Even taking into consideration all the unclear or doubtful words, this very short Dr. Rowen"s description was deliberately made uncertain, not clear, and hey presto, was strip of doctor"s opinion, and leaves an only conclusion that I, allegedly, have connected the "vertigo" (he does not mention any more symptoms, abnormalities (like high temperature and blood pressure), and patient"s complaints, etc.) with "stones in the bladder".


Let's begin with the fact that I did not tell a word about bladder stones to Dr. Rowen, and such a subject was not touched during my conversation with him.


Next day, I have written down everything what was spoken during the conversation with Dr. Rowen, and this account was copied to this chronicle without any changes. I made this report for myself, and it would be ridiculous to assume that I could conceal something from myself, deliberately avoiding mentioning anything.


A day later, I have written absolutely the same to my friends, just "by my own words" (not copying it from my writing), retelling once again what happened during my appearance in St.-Mary"s ER on 21 Jun. 2016.


Each time (describing - what has happened - to another close friend or a relative), I did not copy the text of the previous letter, but has stated retelling anew. The fully identical sense of all these letters according to the semantic contents and on the facts - proves that - in my statement about these events, - I was honest; otherwise, there could be deviations.


Some of these letters (their copies), i.e. the copies of the sent files - have remained: they are in such formats that the forensic experts could confirm their authenticity.


Besides, my friends (as well as I, too) are keeping the copies of our electronic correspondence, and they could send (on my demand) these or those letters: so, the problems with the confirmation of the letters" authenticity should not arise.


However, Dr. Rowen's lie about my alleged suggestion (about vertigo"s link to bladder stones) is not just absolutely ridiculous, but I could not lift this subject at all in principle, because I was so anxious with a probability of a stroke or a micro-stroke that could not speak on any other subjects, except of this, by definition.


Thus, Dr. Rowen could not hear about the bladder stones from me, and - especially - about the alleged dependence between the stones - and vertigo. He could read about the bladder calculi and about the litholopaxy surgery in my Sante Quebec file, or heard something about my conflict with Dr. Morris and about my cancellation of the surgery with Dr. Morris from the latter or from other medical workers in this hospital.


However, it was possible to learn about the same subject under the angle of my statements (that exactly because of Dr. Morris (i.e. because of his medical non-ethical stand, mistrust to patient"s complaints, his refusals of lab tests, antibiotics, and alpha blockers) - the bladder stones have developed in general; then their diagnostics has been artificially delayed; then the stones were infected because of an unnecessary cystoscopy; and, at last, the surgery was postponed - at least - for nearly 3 months; and all this has led not only to urological complications, but also to depression, to many courses of antibiotics and life-threatening infections attacks, to a heart attack, and, here, finally, also to a probable micro-stroke (this is far not everything what happened because Dr. Morris) my health was damaged) - only from my correspondence and from my live communication with my relatives.


In other words, retelling my claims related to the ordeal of lithiasis (and - indirectly - to Dr. Morris) - as responsible for tragic (for me) events, including also the obscure attack that happened on June 21, 2016, - Dr. Rowen could not learn about these reproaches and claims from me, but from someone else, or from other sources.


Having taken - as a basis - such an above-mentioned sense of the "dependence" between the ordeal of lithiasis (i.e. those factors that have provoked an urolithic illness), followed by the sabotage of diagnostics and treatment, - Dr. Rowen has deliberately omitted several subjects in the semantic (logical) row (between vertigo - and stones): to attach a comical, absurd outline to his deceptive-invented statement (submitted as a statement of his patient). The mentioning about, allegedly, raised by his patient subject of bladder stones (especially - in the connection with vertigo) - was an insolent lie, but even more spiteful and meanness lie was Dr. Rowen's drive for inventing absurd statements, characterizing poorly developed mad people, attributing them to a patient with an adequate intellectual development.


But Dr. Rowen has not thought up anything new. The same perfidious, illegal, roguish tricks were already used for discrediting my intellectual potential and my mental health at least twice: in 2007 and 2015: also in the Emergency Rooms - in the hospitals affiliated with McGill university. (Both cases are in details described in this chronicle).


So, Dr. Rowen not just refused to provide medical care for his patient with all signs of a traumatic brain damage or micro-stroke, but also tried to smear, defame, and discredit his patient.


The unfair methods of Dr. Rowen with the omission of the subjects of the logic row are a copy-paste (and equally mean) inventions of two nurses. One nurse (intentionally distorting my account and the chronological sequence of events) has written in her official report "to avoid falling down under the car, I jumped on the trunk", letting out the most important elements of the logical row (2007). She "has "simply" forgotten" to write down that - before I was hit by car"s capote, not trunk (I have not "jumped" on it - as she claimed I, allegedly, said), this car has unexpectedly darted off, and has rushed on me on its maximum starting (for a car with a working motor) speed.


Such a trick with an omission or a shift of the order of events (subjects of logic row) - gives any statements of an exposed to a mockery victim a wild, abnormal sense.


Skilled and trained nurses and doctors are capable to invent and think out phrases, which are very similar to examples from the psychiatry study books where the models of speech of the feeble-minded mad are given.


Another nurse has attributed to me the phrases entirely invented by her ("the police is steeling my urine", etc.). This is not an only pearl from an arsenal of her rich imagination (2015).


It seems that Dr. Rowen is such a low, shameless, impudent, and cynical person that he was in charge of such a mean and dirty work, which is usually given not to doctors, but only to lower medical personnel.


But here is an interesting detail.


Both previous similar cases took place in the connection with the cover-up operations, which goal was to shadow potential criminals: October 2-3, 2007 (the goal was to protect the driver of the car, which hit me, causing serious vascular damage); spring of 2015 (the goal was to protect those, who destroyed the results of my blood-urine tests). By analogy, it is essential to interpret Dr. Rowen"s actions - as the same concealment operation, even at the price of the health or life of the patient.


But who was screened by Dr. Rowen? After all, this time was not neither an attack on me, nor a car accident (incident), etc. On the contrary, I have responded about the doctor, who examined me couple of days ago (in the same ER), very warmly.


Then whom else he could cover-up? Naturally, his fellow colleagues, and, first of all: Dr. Morris. By presenting me as a poorly-developed intellectually, weak-headed person, and, besides, by inventing psychiatric syndromes and prescribing psychiatric drugs (instead of confirming or ruling out - through exams and tests - his patient's self-diagnosis "micro-stroke"), Dr. Rowen aimed to discredit my words about Dr. Morris, i.e. to destroy the confidence about the facts of his colleague's medical crimes.


Asked to commit an action of violence against an "unwanted" patient, and to smear this particular patient for particular reasons, Dr. Rowen was ready to kill me (by refusing the essential medical help), but to whitewash and rehabilitate Dr. Morris!


This is why Dr. Rowen invented that I was, allegedly, speaking about the bladder stones, while, in reality, I said no word about the urolithic illness; this is why he insolently falsified my statements, fabricating all kind of gibberish, which I did not and could not say; this is why he built mountains of scam to connect invented by him phrases to Dr. Morris.


However, Dr. Rowen might be also an informer and provocateur, because one of his main goals was to conceal the reason for my address to St. Mary Hospital's ER at this time: brain damage by micro-stroke or by something else (like narrow-directed microwave radiation).


I never told the doctors that I connect 3 suspicious indisposition attacks (with an unprecedented strong vertigo, vomiting, high temperature, unbelievably intensive sweat, abnormally high leucocytes, etc.) with remotely narrowly targeted microwave radiation; or low-frequency modulation; or ultrasonic wave; or another harmful technological weaponry. I never told about an inevitable conclusion that someone 3 times have tested an unknown type of weapon on me. However, doctors did everything possible in their attempts to erase any objective medical data concerning those 3 incidents, to destroy all information around those 3 incidents, and to classify as secret the obvious facts - as IF THEY KNEW about the true nature of 3 mysterious attacks.


3 similar (vertigo + other symptoms) attacks in 2005, 2013 and 2016 (with the symptoms analogous to the symptoms of the injury from microwave radiation [or an action of a shock ultrasonic wave]) has been, probably, caused by an external influence. In 2015, I found information about claims that, allegedly, some kind of microwave, low-frequency, or ultrasonic weapon was tested on diplomats in London and Tel-Aviv, causing brain damage, and that the same technology was also tested on US soldiers, causing brain damage in them. When I learned about this, I composed a letter with 8 questions about the credibility of such kind of information from the scientific point of view, added the description of 2 similar attacks against me (in 2005 and 2013), and sent this letter to several famous scientists, connected to Toronto University, who were also known for their human rights' protection activism.


Now (21-6-2016), Dr. Rowen acted as if he knew about the whole content of my letter to Toronto scientists and frantically contested my theses. His actions and his fabricated lie aimed to refute - step by step, and point by point - every paragraph of the above-mentioned letter. So, not only for whitewashing Dr. Morris and other doctors, but also for destroying the credibility of my 2015 appeal to Toronto scientists (or, in other words, to destroy my claim that I was attacked by a sort of a secret weapon, in the same way as innocent diplomats and soldiers were attacked), Dr. Rowen did his mean dirty job. For this purpose, Dr. Rowen presented me as a full idiot, falsifying my words, and inventing absolutely incompatible with my personality statements, attributed to me.


This is why he fabricated the whole imaginary conversation to put a suit of an idiot on me.


I could not decipher the second page of Dr. Rowen"s official report (I received only 2 pages from the medical archive), except of 3 words "exam... ativan... cerebral...", but - according to the layout and the writing of the written characters - it is obvious that Dr. Rowen (on this page), apparently, lists the diagnostic tests, which he - actually - did not perform, and, it means that his official report is a complete forgery.


Dr. Rowen not only refused to do his doctor's duty, but used the appearance of his patient in St. Mary's Hospital as an opportunity for cover up of medical and war crimes.


(See the copy of this document below).


Dr. Rowen"s report. The 2-nd page.


The prescription of Ativan by Dr. Rowen.


He did not listen to the carotid arteries by phonendoscope; did not check pupils" reaction to light; he did not check my pulse and breath (I said that I had problems with breathing); he did not measure my temperature and blood pressure (regarding many hours of waiting after the triage room); he did not listen to my heart beat; etc.


Dr. Rowen did NOTHING. He just started to accuse me in simulation of an illness, even before he approached me; and - keeping the same accusatory tone - declared a psychiatric condition, without adducing any proof and without conducting any exams. He - definitely - lied in his report, and insulted me not only in the medical office, but also in his deceptive report.


The confirmation of my version of the events in St.-Mary"s ER (June 21, 2016) were unexpectedly found in a document - where they could be less expected: in the official report of the audiologist for August 23, 2016.


This official report and its full text are provided in this chronicle, for the corresponding book and chapter.


Let's go now to conclusions, assumptions and data that comprises the official report of the audiologist.


First, it is very important that it reflects the harmonious logicality and the internal connectivity of my reasoning (as well as - partially - the official report of Dr. Cermigni (or Cermignani) from April 24, 2015) and sharply contrasts the official reports of Madam Priestley (the nurse), or Dr. Rowen, who talked a complete nonsense in their statements, absolutely distorting and forging my words, and attributing to me completely primitive, illogical, irrational and inconsistent phrases (which reflect their aspirations to present me as a stout idiot, who "is slightly cleverer than a dog").


Secondly, it is evident that the audiologist"s conclusions are identical to my own conclusions and assumptions stated in the letter to Dr. Sejean from February 1, 2016 (sent by fax half a year before the audiologic test).


In the letter to doctor Sejean I wrote:


"Dear Dr. Sejean! After having an acute laryngitis in January 2016, I am not sure about an ability to speak on February 5, 2016 (an appointment at 9.45, at St.-Mary's OPD Clinic). An only alternative is to describe all symptoms and suggestions in writing, in advance: before we meet".


In the official audiologist's report, we see such a phrase:


"2. Laryngitis: yes."


In my letter to doctor Sejean we read:


"Problems with hearing, vocal cords, and naso-oro-and laryngo-pharynx are accumulating for years. Around 15 years ago, I used to visit an otolaryngologist at Royal Victoria Hospital. I received a water flash treatment and went through an audio-test, which produced no diagnosis. I believe that I lost an access to this specialist around 2005 or 2006.

After 2008, I often used to have my right ear blocked while cleaning the nose, or during an extensive and long physical effort.

Simultaneously, I felt like tickles in the throat, and had to clean it, which sometimes used to unblock the ear. Later (since 2012), my right ear started to be blocked for hours or even days."


In the official report of the audiologist we read:


"1. R. Ear blocked: yes."


In my same letter to Dr. Sejean from February 1, 2016, we see:


"My general hearing has also degenerated, forcing to hear only relatively loud and middle pitched sounds, merged with a problem to distinguish between particular verbal phonemes. That is causing a hardship to follow a conversation, and ruining my social life. Even in my native languages I can't catch some verbally pronounced letters, words or phrases, and the same challenge in English and French becomes a real tough task."


In the official report of the audiologist we read:


"L. Hearing is within normal limits 125-250 Hz. (...).

R. Hearing is within normal limits 125-150 Hz. (...)"


In the official report of the audiologist we also read:


"L. Hearing - in normal limits of 125-250 Hz. (...).

R. Hearing - in normal limits of 125-150 Hz. (...)"


(It means that the audibility of sounds in high and low frequency range is lost: exactly what I also wrote in the letter to Dr. Sejean).


There is no need to continue...


It - besides - confirms the connectivity of my reasoning, and proves an impossibility of such statements, which Madam Priestley's (the nurse) and Dr. Rowen have attributed to me.


I could quote hundreds of similar examples, which rebuff the deceptive statements of Dr. Rowen and Madam Pristley by definition.


As a poet and novelist, I can present innumerous enthusiastic reviews, written by famous literary critics and literary men, my biographies and articles (about me) in newspapers and magazines, and my works published in the literary magazines with highest reputation. My historical, philosophical, and scientific works rebuff any insinuations about me as, allegedly, primitive, illiterate, ignorant, and completely stupid person. It's quite another matter that my English and French are not as perfect as I wished, because I never studied English and French with a teacher, never took a course of English or French, and never attended an English or French school. However, as anyone can see, I am able to express myself coherently not only in my native languages.


In my native country, I graduated from a college and two universities, and can show my diplomas to anyone who wants to see them. No oligophrenic person (as Dr. Rowen and M-me Pristley wanted to present me) would be able to graduate from two universities.


In this regard, the audiotest (August 23, 2016) presents me rather adequately, with a thrust at the insinuations of such liars as Dr. Rowen. It is fairly amazing how much objective information can contain a strictly medical report if it was written by an honest and not morally impair medical specialist.


Not quite an ordinary corpus of information is containing in the data, which is not related directly to the audio-test:


"The family doctor argues that the patient began to hear badly since April / May (2016). In May took Septra [a mistake: in June (my own remark: L. G.)] for 3 days, and began to experience dizziness. As it seems to him, it is difficult to distinguish GDTECH. The patient had an impression that it because of the damage of the Central Nervous System".


Thus, everything, which is told here, confirms my statements concerning the dramatic side effects (complications) from Septra-antibiotic, administrating of which was difficult to understand. (It can be explained ONLY by the inhuman antibiotics policy, developed by cruel state institutions and medical bureaucrats in term to reduce the infectious microorganisms' mutations with disregard of underprivileged patients' well-being. This is why I never blamed Dr. Martin LaChance, who may be (when he assessed me) under the influence of governmental bodies, pharmaceutical companies, and other "invisible" participants in patients' drama, caused by the unfair medical system.)


This document (the audiology report) - is one of many others, which confirm that the description of what has happened in connection with Septra (including my suspicions that its side effects could cause this or that brain damage) relate to 2016, and that these statements (stated to my family doctor) have been made right after events in June 2016.


It is necessary to emphasize that - during the audio-test - I said nothing about Septra's side effects and its dreadful consequences.


There is also another aspect: the permanent changes developed right after June 21, 2016 (such as hearing and vision loss, headaches, problems with breath and the swallowing reflex, etc.) - someone (describing my assumptions and suspicions) were reduced only to the consequences of Septra's side effects (prolonged or postponed for a month), ignoring or deliberately suppressing my other statements: that a possible brain damage and all its consequences are generally connected with what happened on June 21, 2016. Thereby, the very similar cases of November 2005; January 2013; and June 2016, which coincide almost on all symptoms - are artificially divided and suppressed.


Such a thin and well thought-over misinformation, only in the minimal degree destroying the truthful reflection of my words, not exaggerating them and not distorting (in the roughest way) the logic row of my reasoning (as did Dr. Rowen), could appear only at a higher level.


A unique rough lie reflected by audiologist's official report and obviously not invented by her (but obtained from unknown medical files or from other doctors' statements): it was a claim that I, allegedly, have addressed in St.-Mary's Emergency Room concerning a panic attack (instead of well-founded suspicions on a micro-stroke or brain ischemia):


"Patient says he came to ER - told it was anxiety attack. Patient said he asked for CT-scan, carotid artery studies: "But they refused me". So .... has vertigo, but continues to have ... discrimination."


The truth is that I NEVER declared to NOBODY that 21 Jun. 2016 came to St.-Mary"s Emergency Room apropos some "panic attacks", but - instead - always claimed that came there because of the suspicions on micro-stroke or brain ischemia. It proves to be true by the recognition of that I "asked for CT-scan, carotid artery studies". Why then I asked to examine carotid artery and to do brain's tomography if "has addressed concerning panic attack"?


However, there is an additional confirmation that the statement that I, allegedly, "have addressed concerning panic attack" - is a misinformation. It is - the phrase "Patient felt CNS worked" (the patient felt that it because of the central nervous system). Though FORMALLY this phrase may be connected (in this document) to the episode with Septra, it ACTUALLY is a sheaf with the following episode in the ER, and, moreover, adjoins to the following:


"Patient felt CNS worked. - Patient says he came to ER Anamnes (...) "...


These phrases are divided only by the heading of the following section "Case History", but there was not a big sense to split them between the different sections, which is obvious.


Differently, this is a continuation of the same logic chain of events.


But this phrase - "Patient felt CNS worked" - is much more eloquent, rather than just a denial of the lie - that I, allegedly, have addressed in St.-Mary"s ER 21 Jun. 2016 apropos a "panic attack", instead of the concerning suspicion on a micro-stroke. Because this phrase was "derived" from the triage nurse"s official report from June 21, 2016, i.e. from this particular official report, which "disappeared" (was destroyed or classified (on my request, the medical archive responded that, allegedly, the triage nurse's official report "is absent in the system" (and in the archive), and I received only 2 pages of Dr. Rowen"s report - as lone remained documentation from my visit to ER).


First, it is obviously not the audiologist's style, who does not distort my words anywhere and did not compose her statement so illiterately (being, possibly, a very competent and educated - in a broad sense - person), and, it means, that this phrase is borrowed from somewhere.


Secondly, I said concerning exactly this content exactly this to the triage nurse (that the central nervous system is involved), and, in reply to my assumption, the triage nurse has blown up, having attacked me that quite reflects the style of her retelling of my words.


And, thirdly, I used the term "the central nervous system" (instead of "brain") one and only time: during the exam (June 21, 2016) by the triage nurse.


Isn't this being a key, why all dates were displaced (in audiologist's official report) for one-two months (i.e. for earlier dates, against the real events)? Isn"t someone wished to take the chronology far away from June 2016, and - especially - from June 21?


But, if I suspected (concerning Septra"s side effects from) that the central nervous system (brain) could be damaged, and if I have addressed in St.-Mary"s ER because something happened to the central nervous system (to the brain), any "panic attack" has nothing to do with it. There are no doubts that exactly for this reason they refused to give me the copy of the triage nurse's report, or (maybe) destroyed it.


It is amazing how one decent person can, without understanding the outcome, to destroy all plots and intrigues of the liars, only by her own nature.


After all, certainly, the audiologist has made a truthful (all lie came from outside, i.e. from some other sources or someone's statements) report not for my sake (as she was obviously - in advance - incited against me and brainwashed), but simply because professionally and honestly performed her work.


The practice of full irresponsibility (and non-accountability) of doctors and their protection (cover-up) by the hospitals, which also includes the withdrawals, blockage or destruction of medical documents, "classifications" of doctors' names (especially concerning the ER), etc. - is an obvious criminal practice.


In this chronicle, I have already described the discrepancy of St.-Mary's ER-ED doctors' names on their breast cards (in comparison to the names specified in the written official reports), and the substitution of names of some doctors by names of others, etc.


As a new, changed tactics of concealment and cover-ups, another method began to circulate already since 2016: the names of ER doctors began to "vanish" from the official documents in 2-3 months. But doctors" anonymity - is the same as the anonymity of bandits bossing under gangster nicknames.


However, even in this picture with Dr. Rowen - all the same - there is still something more disturbing. His motivation (the protectionism of his colleagues and the hospital) is the most probable. But, still, something reads off scale in his behavior.


Such explanations as an absolute indifference towards patients' life and health, and the aspiration to screen his colleagues (even at the price of human life), or simply laziness and unwillingness to strike a finger about a finger, or a primitive judgment about the economy of public funds at the expense of human life and patients' health (which turns out to any state much more expensive): are insufficient to make the full picture of a puzzle. Some slices, some elements all the same are missing. An assumption can fill this emptiness that, behind the motives lying on the surface, some deeper and even more ominous motives were standing up for cruel, brutal, humiliating actions of Dr. John Rowen.


Once, when I sat in an office of one doctor, and waited, while this doctor (occupied behind the computer) was busy, I have risen to lift up my cap dropped to the floor, and have automatically noted that this doctor does not write a report on a previous patient, and does not look through my medical file, but studies information on me in Google. And he did it during his working hours, in the presence of the patient in his office, into whose private life he was digging!


Another time, leaving doctor's office, I heard a name of a female patient, and have suddenly noticed that in a neighbor room a secretary or an assistant, or another doctor is searching (in the same search engine) for private data on this patient.


I also know that doctors, who have no real reason to open an electronic file of this or that patient, quite often look through it with curiosity, or on others, not connected with health-care, reasons.


One acquaintance among whose friends there are few doctors, heard from them that not only patients study the opinions on the Internet about doctors, and collect data on doctors before making a choice, but also doctors ransack in the Network (and not only in the Net) in search of especially confidential information on their actual or potential patients. And not only doctors individually, but clinics, hospitals, or radiologies: collect (through the management staff, secretaries, or assistants) confidential information about their patients.


In 1998, the central police department in Montreal has denied me a license for firearms (which was required for a potential work in a security agency (where, having despaired to find any other work, I have been forced to submit my application; there was a sharp shortage of the qualified personnel in this sphere by then). My attempts to receive an official response, on what basis it been refused to me, have not crowned by success. (However, I have received some kind of an informal answer).


Today, it is already widely known that - in the course of applications for firearms' permission evaluations, - Canadian police studies data on citizens in social networks and other doubtful sources. It is not less widely known that the Canadian gendarmerie uses military liaison methods against the activists of American Indian tribes, against their protest movements and organizations.


Such methods (data collection, analysis and a forecast of his efficiency in propaganda, organizational and media spheres; gathering personal confidential information for studying the weak, sensitive, painful places of each "unwanted" individual, and developing military and diversionary ways of their neutralization) are normally applied within the fight against an enemy, against a military adversary, not against own population.


A similar totalitarian violation of "privacy" and of the principle of the presumption of innocence, and of other fundamental principles by the medical and police communities, which rapprochement and convergation goes at full speed in all directions in all countries, subjects to corruption all main principles of democracy; freedom of speech and opinions; human and civil rights; the division of executive, legislative and judicial authority; the accountability of governmental and non-governmental services and institutions; etc.


At the beginning of 2000-s, I foretold that the totalitarian electronic tyranny, and total surveillance on citizens by means of a monstrous network of video surveillance, accumulation of huge databases and illegal collecting of confidential information: will lead to corruption of the bases of the society, and to the prompt growth of crimes. 10-15 years have passed since my predictions, and they have completely come true: the number of crimes is promptly growing not only in Toronto and in the southern provinces of Canada, but even in Vancouver, Ottawa, even in Quebec, the safest province in Canada, and in its largest city - Montreal.


The monstrous dystopian Orwellian system, which was mounted under the pretext of "safety", has rendered and renders an opposite effect, and it was explained in my forecasts.


In a broader sense, the crime corps includes also the shocking indifference of the ranking officers (doctors, engineers, financial, political and business leaders) to people's needs, to their life and health. Human life's value became so corrupted that no one cares about hundreds, thousands, or millions of unnecessary and preventable deaths. The majority of wonderful people with compassionate hearts are still working within the medical system in Canada, but they can do nothing until sadists and moral freaks, who got the control of the health care system, will be replaces by morally adequate individuals.


In all countries, which have regenerated into proto-tyrannies, trains and buses began to crash more often; bridges - to fall (burying under them hundreds of human bodies); buildings, restaurants and hotels - to burn up or to fall; and natural disasters - to bring much more destructions and troubles: due to disorder, indifference, and criminal negligence of the management; because the mouths of all critics of all dangerous projects and practices are sealed by the corrupted officials, who are signing potentially dangerous engineering and development plans, or irresponsible political decisions, which lead to catastrophic consequences.


And - without the criticism at all levels and in all social groups, not only from the height of the "permitted" broadcasts of the state radio, - the bridges and planes will fall more and more often, the innocent citizens will perish from the bullets of gangster morons, and the trains will collide and crash "out of the blue"...


And the malignant regeneration of the functions of the medical workers and the policemen, lowered from above (in which there is no fault of doctors and policemen) reflects the process of former democratic states' transformation into the repressive left or right regimes, into the proto-fascist ("red" or "gray-brown") dictatorships.


All 3 today's main "right-wing" (or "left-wing": no difference) parties in all post-democratic countries - neoliberals, neoconservatives and neopopulists - strive to assure today"s inert (and brainwashed) general public (especially the youth) that the democracy is an existence of a ballot box and ballots with the names of 2 or several parties. It is a lie. It is not a democratic, but a majoritarian principle, comparable with a situation, in which 2 conflicting criminal gangs have decided to make peace - and have divided among themselves the control over this or that area.


The whole "democracy" is reduced to a ballot box as to a relict of the former democracy rule (which is not present any more) without the protection of personal information, free press, freedom of speech; without the liberties and human rights; without an independent court; without the division of the executive and legislative power; without the guaranteed rights of political opposition (which is not limited to one or two opposition parties of the "official opposition"); without the presumption of innocence; without the observance of the constitutional laws and rights; without the equality of citizens and rule of law; and without other main structural, systemic, legal and political principles. Besides, without all mentioned above, even the ability to vote is melting: homeless; handicap; poor; discriminated; elderly; sick (who were refused the medical care); immigrants; and other groups of people have bogus voting rights (only nominally (on paper), but not actually).


And here (when only a ballot box is left from ex-democracies), first, wins not the party, which collects more votes, but the party, which controls the votes counting (more often: which will raise more money and will gain support of the pseudo-ethnic mafia and oligarchical circles, and which is more dexterous in the roguish tricks with the votes and manipulations with the databases of personal information by means of social networks). And, secondly, this majoritarian-oligarchic pseudo-democracy very quickly and inevitably becomes a bunch of fascist regimes.


Based on reaction of some doctors to my words, and according to ombudsmen" answers to my complaints (not just those that are specified in this chronicle; including the oral responses), and on actions of the medical authorities: I made a stable impression that not only my views and my statements that are circulating in social networks and on Internet (in general) are known to them, but also the content of my personal correspondence and telephone conversations.


And, though I have not mentioned a word about the suspicions that the symptoms of an inexplicable acute indisposition, vertigo and other symptoms on November 3, 2005; a similar (more severe) attack on January 7, 2013; and a similar (more severe) attack on June 21, 2016 (after which my hearing and my vision were damaged) - were the consequences of the narrowly targeted radiation from an unknown weapon, which action was tested on me three times, Dr. Rowen could still have information on my statements concerning what happened on January 7, 2013, which immediately pointed the arrows to the case of June 21, 2016, as identical, and, thus, connected with the same suspicions.


And, depending on his personal views and values, this information could embitter him against me 2 times stronger.


The same scheme was acting after the car incident on October 2, 2007, when someone could decide that this "accident" occurred, probably, not "accidently", and - for this reason - I was denied medical care; and the same pattern has played a role in the events after January 7, 2013, and June 21, 2016, and could put in action the whole brutality and cruelty of Dr. Rowen, of which he only was capable.


As well doctor LaChance (see events for June 2, 2016) could (within 40 minutes!) not only to "dig" into my medical file in Santé Québec, but also to put his nose in the search engines and social networks, getting personal and confidential information on me from there, and, consequently, had an obvious prejudice to me.


Unlike the events on January 7, 2013, when the phenomenally strong vertigo and other symptoms "have fallen down" literally from anywhere and when that attack had no explanations and roots in my previous conditions and in my medical history (in exception of a milder similar event in 2005), the events on June 21, 2016, could have (alongside with the exposure to microwave radiation) also a natural origin as well, and a lot of things that preceded these events, could lead to a stroke or a micro-stroke.


But, if those, who have tested on me their secret weapon (if the suspicions about microwave or ultrasonic radiation are not groundless), were well informed about all my medical peripetias, they could arrange a new attack during such a moment and in such a situation, when the plausibility of a heart attack or a stroke (by the natural reasons) was at the peak, and, thereby, to camouflage the invisible attack.


Another, not less ominous scenario: if Dr. John Rowen has entered into the medical office of patients' examination at 23:00, and has declared at once that I should go home and not to come any more to this hospital "without a reason" did it with a rigid order "from above" to get rid of me (to kick me out; to send me home) without any medical care and without any diagnostic procedures.


JUNE 22, 2016.


On June 22, 2016, - despite my awful general health situation and with all the complications of yesterday's indisposition attack - I had to go (with my wife) to St. Mary Hospital's ER (at 9:20 a.m.), with Dr. Rowen's verbal assurance that I'll have an access to CT-scan. However, when we came there, no one was informed by Dr. Rowen about allegedly appointed CT-scan. Nor the reception nurse, neither the triage nurse: nobody was informed by Dr. Rowen about the CT-scan.


We just wasted 2 and a half hours in the waiting room, without any success. Dr. Rowen has deceived me! Having strong headache, dizziness, and the whole number of other indispositions, I had to suffer for no reason thanks to Dr. Rowen. Only a cruel sadist could do it to another person.


I also had to visit my permanent dentist, who treated me around 20 years (Dr. Jeffrey H. Tenzer). At 16:00, he has accepted me at his office - 5885 Cote-des-Neiges, Suite 509, Montreal, Quebec H3S 2T2. Tel.: (514) 737-9367. I have told to Dr. Tenzer that I suspect a cyst on the top gum, on the right side.


However, the whole dental care was put on hold, because the next day (or, probably, the 2 day after Dr. Tenzer"s announcement that I have to go to a specialized clinic) my urologist has reported that the litholopaxy surgery will, probably, take place on June 30, 2016. He has not been confident yet about it, and has reported that will call back at the beginning of the next week.


CHAPTER 11


The degradation of my hearing was mistreated in the same way.


I already described (see above) how it was "treated" in Royal Victoria hospital. After 2006 I had no otolaryngologist at all. Nor the walk-in clinics, nor my family doctor could book for me an appointment with a specialist.


Besides the hearing loss, I had the loss of voice. Sometimes the voice just disappeared, and I could not speak any more. In November-December, 2016, this problem has aggravated to the extreme. And, still, I received no medical help.


At the end of 2008, my family doctor has glanced in my throat as a real otolaryngologist, and said that does not see any small knots or other pathologies (laryngitis, etc.) neither in the throat, nor on vocal chords. (Besides, I have pain (from time to time) in the same place of the neck - since 2001 - up to this day, for already 15 years. But especially often and importunately, it bothered me in 2008-2009).


In this regard, my family doctor has sent me on scanning of the thyroid gland. As to a specialized ultrasonography and a referral to a specialist, he - as it seemed to me - hesitated in reply to my request. He told me to wait on the corridor, while he himself began to call somewhere. Maybe he tried to negotiate with radiology about me, or urgently called apropos another patient: it is not known. But I have involuntarily caught some phrases from his conversation, which could relate (on probability) both to me and to somebody else. The doctor spoke in English with a specialist, apparently, with an otolaryngologist. Certainly, maybe, he carried on negotiations with a specialist who was attended by another patient. But, if there is a probability that he spoke with someone about me, most likely, it was his friend from the St.-Mary"s hospital, doctor Sejean, who, having listened to the description of the problems (symptoms), has declared something like that "it is not required to such a patient neither an ultrasound or a visit to a specialist ". And (that indirectly followed from the remarks of my family doctor) has called in question that "in general something hurts" in this patient.


If it was concerning me, it really was doctor Sejean, and, if so, it leads to an inevitable conclusion about his obvious prejudice. This case, as well as an example of the pressure upon other doctors from Dr. Wanda Brzezinska, throws light on a blocking mechanism, which is obstructing an access to medical treatment, medicines and medical diagnostic tests by a group of ideologically-focused and motivated by reactionary and aggressive ideological views doctors having not simply a huge influence on my family doctor, but also the means of the application of rough blackmail and administrative pressure upon any doctor.


The ultrasound administrated by Dr. Rohan. [See the copy below.]


(Next page)


At first, the thyroid gland ultrasound was appointed to September 2, 2008. (Date 2011/11 - is the medical card"s expiring date). After, the thyroid gland ultrasound was transferred from 2 Sep. 2008 for November 21, 2008. (See below)


When the result was ready, my family doctor has told that everything is in norm, and there no even the slightest abnormality.


Nevertheless, since November 21, 2008, he for anything did not want to provide for me a copy of the thyroid gland ultrasound"s report, and I have never received it. My family doctor did not refuse this copy to me, but or "talked over" the conversation, transferring it to other subjects, or promised to give me the copy "next time". It is not known: whether he covered up the result"s (report"s) disappearance (quite probably that the result of this ultrasonography has already by then just vanished (and the doctor have obliged to cover it up), or there was something in it that the doctor for anything did not want to show it to me).


Probably, this scan has shown other problems, and, in particular, with the vocal chords, and it was Dr. Sejean, who, using all his and Dr. Morris"s influence, has blocked to me the access to this report.


In December 2008, I have addressed in the hospital"s archive, having filled the corresponding form, with the request for a copy of the ultrasound"s (November 21, 2008) report.


This copy was never given to me, and when - in the 2009 - I personally showed up in the archive to investigate what has befallen with this document, they have answered that cannot find it in their system"s database.


Meanwhile, judging by the blood tests, not everything was OK with the hormonal function of the thyroid gland:


The blood test on April 23, 2008.


(see next example below)


The blood test on April 23, 2008 (one more page).


The blood test on September 23, 2008.


The blood test on September 23, 2008 (other page).


Having seen the result of the blood test from September 2, 2008, I have noticed to my family doctor that, in my case, the raised indicator of TSH - for certain - testifies to a reaction to an infection by the antibodies development, which - theoretically - could attack and injure the thyroid gland. I considered a possibility of such a scenario in practice rather small, but a possibility of a temporary failure of the thyroid function due to an attack of antibodies: quite real. The doctor has answered nothing to my remarks.


FEBRUARY 5, 2016.


On February 5, 2016, I, at last, have broken through on appointment with Dr. Sejean (St.-Mary"s OPD (C) 7th Floor).


This doctor-otolaryngologist has met me already with hostility from the very first time, when he was seeing me at his private office on Queen Mary's avenue.


Probably, it has been somehow connected to Dr. Morris, or with my complaints to St.-Mary"s hospital" ombudsman, or with something else that this doctor knows about me.


Otherwise, it is not possible in any way to explain his aggressive hostility, almost undisguised hatred.


Therefore, for a long time I tried to get an appointment with another otolaryngologist, but, as well as in the case with Dr. Morris, it has appeared not so simple.


The "number" to doctor Sejean on February 5, 2016.


When - in a year, - I have received "all" official reports of doctor Sejean (and the documents related to my visits to him at St. Mary's hospital) from the medical archive, it has appeared that ALL records are absent, except of one, the last: for July 7, 2017.


Where the others have gone? Have been withdrawn? Destroyed? Or, maybe, the hospital simply blocked me an access to them? Or, maybe, doctor Sejean wrote down nothing during other rendezvous, in defiance of all norms and laws?


Anyway, the complete absence (in exception of 1 only report) of doctor"s records means that both Dr. Sejean and the hospital have something to hide.


For my part, I can provide the proof concerning each rendezvous, confirming that there were 4 appointments with Dr. Sejean, not just 1, as someone wants to allege.


I have all the "waiting numbers" papers and other documents concerning these rendezvous, all recordings of my telephone conversations with the secretaries, during which I was given the rendezvous dates (for example, February 5, 2016...); the metro tickets for a trip to Dr. Sejean and back, etc.


(See above one of the "numbers" taken at the secretariat - with which I went to a rendezvous with doctor Sejean on February 5, 2016).


Besides, the date "February 5, 2016" - as the date of my visit of doctor Sejean - is mentioned in the official audiologist"s report (see below).


The copies of Dr. Sejean"s prescriptions written on hospital policlinic"s official forms also have remained by me, with the signature of Dr. Sejean, where a date is accurately specified; and the "cards" of the official forms with the dates of rendezvous and a seals, and a signature - where the number is also accurately visible. If someone planned to conceal ALL the rendezvous, except of the last one (July, 2017), there is nothing left for them to support the lie (see further).


Apropos the "number" (it originates directly from the hospital, detached by a patient at the registry, before any visit to doctor, for the purpose of registration in the registry before a rendezvous). When I sat on the corridor and waited for my turn (the nurse called patients to the office by their family names), another nurse has approached me, and has demanded to show the "number" that I was holding. She has taken it from me in her hands, has brought close to her eyes. Then the "number" was returned to me, but I think that it was replaced by another one with some unknown purpose.


The rendezvous with Dr. Sejean has been appointed on 9.45, and I have come to the hospital and have addressed with the medical card in the registry before someone else.


In the line, 2 patients of doctor Sejean have got to talking, and have told that their rendezvous has been appointed at 10:00 and at 10:30. However, doctor Sejean has called into his office everyone, except me, including those 2 patients, whose appointments were booked after 10:00 a.m., and who came to the policlinic after me.


He was examining all his patients 3-7 times "quicker", than at his private office, where he spent on everyone at least forty minutes; however, he has put a record of "high-speed" reception on me: 3 minutes.


Doctor Sejean always (no exceptions!) invited me into his office when he was writing the official reports and filled documentation on other patients. I quite could (during his literary trash, when he worked on the files of those whom he has already examined) - to continue sitting on the corridor.


In the same time, Dr. Sejean called other patients, when he already finished his writing, but not me.


Doctor Sejean told me - several times (already since our second meeting) - that my problems (the nose air pipe compression stuffs up the ears; serum jams in the ears; sharp hearing"s degradation, etc.) could solve only Dr. Rappoport, who works in the Jewish General hospital. But, when I have reminded to Dr. Sejean that to book an appointment with another otolaryngologist is impossible without a referral, and have asked him to issue a referral for a consultation (or to write out a referral directly to doctor Rappoport), Dr. Sejean has reacted to this request (for some unknown reasons) very aggressively.


When I used to enter into his office, Dr. Sejean humiliated me: he (without having answered my greeting) stood in a pointed manner with his back to me, filling official reports not less than 10-15 minutes, and, it was obvious that he deliberately "collected" this work for the time of my appointment.


The door to his office always remained open (though - at his private office - he densely closed the door behind a patient, who entered his examination room), and everyone who was sitting on the corridor could hear each word of his conversation with other patients. This looked like a deliberate humiliation over patients, who can not pay for the visits to his private office.


That day ex-terminators [Desinsectors] - could come again at 8.00-16.00 at any time, - and I have asked doctor Sejean to examine me quicker because I have something like a force-majeure situation, but he even not turned his head to my side at all, completely ignoring my request and not manifesting his reaction in any way.


He also ignored my request for a referral to a hematologist in connection with bloody discharges from the nose. He simply did not answered at all.


As to the hearing damage, it is necessary to point to some additional facts.


Approximately, 3-4 months prior to January 7, 2013, I have noticed that 2 or 3 times - when I approached to the salon"s window, I felt a kind of a pressure as though the air became elastic, and pressed on my face. It was accompanied by a short-term deterioration of health which right there passed as soon as I went on a corridor or to the kitchen. All these cases took place when the jalousie has been mostly lifted up, so, that almost nothing was covering the window. After these incidents I noted some short-term (though, probably, and long-term) - as it seemed to me - deterioration of hearing. Not casually in my fax to doctor Sejean I mentioned 2012 as the beginning of hearing"s degradation. But after the vertigo on January 7, 2013, there was a sharp degradation of hearing, and I wrote to friends, and mentioned it in one of my chronicle versions.


About gravity of this deterioration also tells the comparative conclusions of the 1-st audiology text (2005) - and the 2-nd (2015) (see in the section for the corresponding period chronologically).


This comparison shows that if at the beginning of 2000-s my hearing was completely in norm, after 2013 there was a sharp and serious loss of hearing at the level of partial disability (partial deafness).


It is possible to assume that the radiation, to which, probably, I was exposed on January 7, 2013, has led to brain"s injury, which, in turn, has caused the sharp decrease in hearing.


CHAPTER 12


AUGUST 23, 2016. TUESDAY.


On Tuesday (August 23, 2016, St.-Mary's hospital) I have passed an audiology (hearing) test, appointed to 9:00 mornings in the office B-272.


This test was administrated by Dr. Sejean, who sees his patients at his private office on Queen Mary Street, and in St.-Mary's hospital policlinic (OPD (C) 7th Floor).


This doctor-otolaryngologist has met me with hostility already from the very first time, when he was seeing me at his private office on Queen Mary's avenue. Probably, it has been somehow connected to Dr. Morris, or with my complaints to the ombudsman of St.-Mary"s hospital, or with something else that this doctor knows about me.


Otherwise, it is impossible - in any way - to explain his aggressive hostility, almost undisguised hatred. Therefore, for a long time, I tried to get an appointment with another otolaryngologist, but, as well as in the case with Dr. Morris, it has appeared to be not so simple.


At the end of November - beginning of December 2016, I endured one of the most painful and tragic periods in my life. A "vague" (since it could not solve my problems by definition) surgery on bladder stones removal (first, which left a number of complications, and, secondly, initially not solving all the problems, which have resulted from the unethical and prejudice treatment of the urologist, doctor Morris, and other doctors and medical institutions); expectation of the following surgery, and the stay in uncertainty concerning its date and probable results (or consequences); the whole drama of the experiences of very painful and resulted in many complications dental surgery operations (with probable fault of Dr. Solomon Solei"s clinic regarding this drama); heavy depression provoked by the actions of doctor Morris and crimes, committed against my health in several ER offices of Montreal hospitals); further deterioration the vision, hearing, and voice, and development of complications related to the trauma caused by inexplicable cases on November 3, 2005; January 7, 2013; and June 21, 2016, and their consequences, including the vitreous body detachment and sight and hearing loss; new (after November 3, 2005) sharp deterioration of hearing, provoked by the events on January 7, 2013, and 3 incidents with inexplicable vertigo and brutal (up to the cruelty) treatment in ER, and sabotage of medical help; almost complete loss of a voice - accompanied by the episodes when (for an unknown reason) the nose was bunged up as well; and many other health problems: this all not only rendered a demoralizing, oppressing impact, but also interfered with my normal functioning and communication with people, undermining the bases of my human existence.


It was a true human tragedy developing against the sadistic approach to my health problems by some of the doctors, by medical institutions and public services; continuation of persecution by police; and cruel provocations, which brutality in tens times amplified my depression and the general deteriorated state of health.


This whole personal catastrophe has amplified my professional tragedy - as for a musician the loss of hearing is the end of everything that filled the existence by the great light of creativity and allowed to be somehow reconciled with the sad reality.


I have tried to explain all this in the letter to doctor Sejean after his very first attempt to shift the fault for his own unwillingness to see and to treat me - on myself. I only did not mention the claims to doctors and medical institutions. I even have handed over to doctor Sejean a computer disk with the records of my musical works and my piano interpretations of classical music.


However, this not only failed to soften his brutality, but, on the contrary, he began to treat me with even bigger rage and cruelty.


Already at the first meeting, seeing his unwillingness to help me, I have told him that if he does not want to see me among his patients, he is obliged to direct me to another specialist (otolaryngologist), but doctor Sejean left my statement without an answer.


During next years, I tried (several times) to obtain a referral to another otolaryngologist, but neither in a district clinic of CLSC, nor in walk-in clinics (where I addressed) - they refused it to me.


The first meeting with doctor Sejean has taken place at his private office on Queen Mary Avenue, where I have got only from the 2-nd attempt since at first doctor Sejean obviously did not wish to see me at all. It happened at the end of 2015, when both the nose and the ears began to be blocked simultaneously very often, almost every day, so that I could hear nothing at all.


At the end of November and in the first days of December, 2015, I called Dr. Sejean"s office several times (514) 738-0175), and, eventually, his secretary has booked for me an appointment for December 9, 2015, at 15:00, at 3535, Qeen Mary, room 306.


She dictated me the office"s address and fax number.


However, on Wednesday, December 9, 2016, when I arrived to this appointment, the secretary has declared that she has no record about this rendezvous, and - it has turned out, - that I have arrived to Dr. Sejean"s office in vain.


(There were such circumstances by then that it was extremely difficult for me to come there, and this cost me many efforts and health).


However, she knew something particular about an alleged "disappearance" of my rendezvous" record, because, otherwise, would not agree to convince Dr. Sejean to see me after his present patient.


(The paid patient, who was examined by Dr. Sejean instead of me, has stayed in his office 48 minutes (I looked at my watch). And - in his "state" (public) office in St.-Mary"s hospital, - he examines his patients for "free" (for which in any case receives money from the government!) no more than 5-10 minutes.)


However, doctor Sejean has refused to assess and examine me (it leads to a conclusion that my rendezvous was artfully and dishonestly cancelled on his own initiative). He talked to me on the doorway of his office (where has not let me in!), in a manner, which humiliated my human dignity, and motivated the refusal to assess me by an excuse that, allegedly, the ultrasound test, which, finally, is essential (according to a short description of my family doctor), can be made only in St.-Mary"s hospital - and through an appointment IN the hospital.


I, having felt that this doctor does not wish me as his patient, has told him (in the same place: in the doorway of his office) that if he does not want such a patient as myself, he is obliged to refer me to another doctor. Doctor Sejean has refused to reply, and only has pushed me into the waiting room. But, before this, he has demanded from me to leave him the original of my family doctor"s referral. Thereby, he has put me in a difficult situation because has brought out to me (to the waiting room) only a note - not assured by the seal and without his signature - to OPD policlinic"s (in St.-Mary"s hospital) secretaries, and a phone number, and that"s all.


Without the referral"s original, having only a printer, which works with failures, I have been compelled to send a fax with the image of a copy of the referral; otherwise, I would have no explanation and no official document accompanying the writing trash of doctor Sejean.


I could not read the "medical handwriting" of doctor Sejean, and have assumed that this is an address to the secretary to appoint a date of passing an ultrasound...


In January 2016, after the sabotage - arranged with doctor Sejean, - I lost completely the voice, and almost could not speak.


Approximately, on December 16, 2015, I have called the St.-Mary"s OPD policlinic (514) 734-2698) trying to receive a rendezvous and speaking hoarsely and almost whispering into the phone with a huge effort, because my voice has gone. But, instead of the date for an ultrasound, they only promised to call back.


The whole month has passed: nobody called back.


Since January 20, 2016, I tried to contact the phone number (514) 734-2698 several times, and only on January 25, 2016, have broken through, and have received an unknown appointment (for any procedure) - for February 5 2016, at 9:45.


As to the ultrasound test - as it has appeared, the secretaries could not book it without an official standard referral of Dr. Sejean and without his signature on the official form.


My social, professional, and private life continued to collapse even further because of the loss (in addition to the acute vision"s deterioration) of voice and hearing.


Thus, Dr. Sejean:


1) did not wish me to accept me, though he never saw me before.

2) has cancelled a rendezvous, which was appointed by his secretary, having destroyed the record, or having instructed the secretary that she must tell lies concerning the lack of a rendezvous.

3) When the secretary - after all - has agreed to give me a chance to see Dr. Sejean (after his patient), he has refused to see me, under a far-fetched pretext.

4) Without knowing, who I am, Dr. Sejean has already been set up frankly spitefully and hostile.

5) The nature of his prejudice, his special aggression of manifesting openly his hostility is difficult to explain even if he was aware about my conflict with Dr. Morris, about my complaints to the ombudsman (concerning the disappearances of my lab tests), and about a wild incident in MGH hospital"s ER.


As an otolaryngologist, Dr. Sejean, possibly, could find and assess the damage of the vestibular mechanism, which, probably, was linked to the inexplicable cases (attacks by an unknown weapon?) on November 3, 2005; January 7, 2013; and June 21, 2016.


Dr. Sejean at first simply played for time, having cancelled the first rendezvous and believing that will not see me any more at all, but my problems have forced me to look for a solution, and I could not find it without the medical care. And, as an access to other otolaryngologists has been completely blocked for me, Dr. Sejean became that person who was (de facto) protecting the secrecy of what exactly happened on November 3, 2005; January 7, 2013; and June 21, 2016.


Problems with hearing, vocal chords, and pharynx have accumulated for many years.


About 15 years before these events, I attended an otolaryngologist in Royal Victoria Hospital. Several times my ears were washed out by then (the jams of sulphur blocked them, despite all measures), and I have also passed the audio-test, which has not given any diagnosis.


By then the hearing was only slightly lowered.


The same doctor has directed me on a hearing test (the audiology test) after a case on November 3, 2005, when - as I consider - an unknown remote weapon capable to inflict remotely a brain injury was tested on me. By then there was the first essential decrease in hearing.


I have lost the access to this specialist approximately in 2006.


After 2008, I was experiencing frequent stiffness of the right ear, which used to become stuffed up (blocked) - especially during essential and long physical efforts.


At the same time, I often felt a sore throat similar to quinsy, or tickled in the throat, and I had to clean the throat, which sometimes unblocked the stuffed-up ear.


Later (starting in 2012) the right ear began to be blocked for hearing for many hours or even days. The hearing in general has also worsened, causing such problems as an impossibility to hear a range of sounds, except of rather loud and middle (on height) sounds, and also a problem to distinguish the separate verbal phonemes. It has led to the difficulty in understanding of speech, to impossibility to keep up a conversation and has destroyed my social life and communication with people.


Even in my native languages I cannot catch some orally pronounced letters (sounds), words or phrases, and overcoming the same problem within the communication in English and French becomes an impracticable task.


By pressing by a finger near the canal of the external ear, and - at the same time - widely opening and closing the mouth, I can hear a loud "click". When - even without the pressure - I simply do the same by a wide movement by the bottom jaw, I can hear a specific sound in the right ear. However, despite my innumerous demands, I could not receive a referral to a specialist otolaryngologist since 2009 so far.


Since December 11 the 2015, the situation (the deterioration of hearing and voice) has worsened again.


During the period between 11 December 2015 - and 31 January 2016, the right ear - or both ears - used to be completely stuffed up during many days, and the vocal chords hurt so that I was not capable to make a sound.


I have noticed that - when I press a thumb to the neck below an ear - the ear will temporarily be unblocked; when I remove the finger or put a weaker pressure - the ear is blocked again.


(Sphenoid bosom, adenoids or almonds can play any role). [In 1979, as a result of a mean and brutal attack, my nose was broken', and the nasal partition remained bent.]


During the same period (December 2015) there was a sharp laryngitis and pharyngitis, with the signs of painful-unhealthy vocal chords (which could be irritated and inflamed even by a small amount of fresh food or drinks), dried-up throat (with discomfort and feeling as though an alien body), loss of voice, etc.


By means of a small lamp and pressing the tongue by a spoon"s handle wiped by an anti-septic, it was possible to see an inflamed, red throat, and I even have made some photos in December 2015, and at different times in 2016.


Especially - painful throat and ears, and a sharp decrease in hearing, and most long stuffy nose and ears: all this took place at the end of January 2016 (till January 31). It took all 7 days before I could feel some improvements. During the same period there was an ulcer on the top pfaltsgraf, which could have the same nature as the laryngitis. Ulcer inflammations in the mouth or in the throat have happened nearly every month. The sharpest and - besides - irreversible deterioration of hearing has occurred after the 3-rd episode of the vertigo (June 2016), accompanied by other symptoms, which combination can assume a trauma of the central nervous system (brain), with the signs, which are listed in the directories and study-books, describing the complications from the intensive micro-wave radiation (which bring up a suggestion about a secret remote weapon, which uses the microwave radiation or blow of an ultrasonic wave). It concerns the episodes on November 3, 2005; January 7, 2013; and June 21, 2016.


It is possible that the sabotage of the medical care by Dr. Sejean not only has caused a significant damage to my hearing and triggered additional sufferings, but also has provoked a new drama connected with the vision deterioration and further complications after the vitreous body detachment: a close-angle syndrome, glaucoma and cataract; because a chronic inflammation of nasopharynx, blocked nose and ears, and pathological changes of the pressure in nose and ears canals could play an additional role in aggravating a close-angle syndrome as a cause of glaucoma (which non-professional "treatment" (mistreatment) by Dr. Gans (see below) - in turn - has provoked the cataract).


The 2-nd meeting with doctor Sejean (and the 1-st rendezvous in St.-Mary"s hospital) has been appointed to February 5, 2016, at 9:45.


I have arrived to the hospital and have addressed with the medical card in the registry before somebody else.


2 between Dr. Sejean"s waiting patients have got to talking, and have told that their appointments were scheduled between 10:00 and 10:30. However, Dr. Sejean has called everyone to his office, one by one (including those 2 patients, whose rendezvous have been appointed after 10:00 a.m., and who have appeared in the policlinic after me) - except me. He examined all the patients 3-7 times "quicker", than at his private office; however, he has put a record of "high-speed" reception on me: 3 minutes.


Both that time (and later) Dr. Sejean has used unworthy (not only for a doctor) artful tricks, inviting me in his office after several other patients (even if I was the first in turn both on appointment"s time, and on my arrival time), after whose departure (from his office) he did not fill any medical report, and collected the paperwork of several reports by the time of my emergence in his office. And, thus, he artificially created a situation of my stay in his office while he was writing the official reports filling out the documentation on several other patients.


I quite could (during his paperwork [on those whom he has already examined]) - to remain on the corridor.


Dr. Sejean called other patients when he already finished his paperwork, but not me.


When this or that Dr. Sejean"s nurse invited me in his office, the doctor was ALWAYS standing at some kind of a bureau, without paying any attention to me and without answering to my greetings, and continuing to write - standing. To humiliate me, he (each time) steadily turned his back to me though at the moment of my emergence ALWAYS stood sideways. This ritual has repeated to the smallest trifles, always according to once (from the first time) established order.


While I sat and waited on the corridor (and the door into his office ALWAYS remained wide open, and ALL the sitting outside could hear every doctor"s and his patient"s word: thus, Dr. Sejean, possibly, tried to humiliate people who were not able to pay for their visits to his private office; it is necessary to emphasize that at his PRIVATE office [which I have visited twice] the door to the examination room ALWAYS remained DENSELY CLOSED while he examined a patient), I heard how the doctor used to start talking to every next patient at most in 30-50 seconds [after a patient has entered into the examination room]. As to me, it used to pass not less than 10-15 minutes before doctor Sejean came off his paperwork. All other doctors normally made a break between patients" visits (possibly - to write down a short summary on every patient), and have filled the documentation alone, BETWEEN examining the patients (and calling in a next patient only when have already stopped writing or entering the data into computer).


Therefore, there is no doubt that, unlike other patients, I was called to his office always when he was engaged in his paperwork; so, he thereby sophisticatedly scoffed over me and humiliated me.


If to remember that Dr. Sejean actually has "evicted" me from his private office, it turns out that my 1-st visit to him in practice was on February 5, 2016: as the 1-st official meeting between doctor and his patient. And here, already by then - he has declared to me that my problems could be solved only by a certain Dr. Rappoport who works in the Jewish General hospital. Probably, it also was his answer to my phrase at his private office (December 9, 2015, at 15:00) that - if he does not want to treat me - he is OBLIGED to refer me to another doctor. But, when I have reminded Dr. Sejean that - without a referral - I cannot get an appointment with Dr. Rappoport, and have asked him to organize a consultation for me, or to channelize me somehow to doctor Rappoport, doctor Sejean has reacted to this request extremely aggressively.


But why - doctor Rappoport and why in the Jewish hospital? There are a number of other top-class specialists in French and English Montreal hospitals. And, besides, Dr. Rappoport is seeing patients not only in the Jewish General, but also in the Royal Victoria hospital and in his office at a specialists" clinic. And this leads to a conclusion that Dr. Sejean was well informed about the content of my immigration file - or knew something about it, or | and was somehow connected to the cover-up of the episodes on November 3, 2005; January 7, 2013; and June 21, 2016.


When - at the following visit - I have asked Dr. Sejean why he recommends particularly Dr. Rappoport, and what exactly Dr. Rappoport specially knows, or authorized, or able to do that he (Dr. Sejean) cannot, Dr. Sejean has answered nothing.


So, I will repeat that - when I entered into Dr. Sejean"s office, he humiliated me by refusing to answer my greeting (he turned away, showing his back) in a pointed manner, and stood, doing some paperwork not less than 10-15 minutes, and it was obvious that he deliberately "collected" this work for the time of my visit.


The door into the examination room (into his office at St.-Mary"s) always remained open (though at his private office he was densely closing the door into the examination room), and all sitting on the corridor could hear each word of his conversation with every patient.


One more invariable ritual, which was carried out by Dr. Sejean during each my visit, consisted in an unpleasant and sometimes painful throat"s inspection through nose by means of a special tube.


Doctor Sejean performed this operation very speedily, for only a few seconds, and, possibly, with violations of its safety requirements and regulations. And, as this ritual was performed steadily and always in the same order, and always followed other rituals in the same order, it became obvious that Dr. Sejean used this procedure as some kind of punishment. [It is not excluded (I am not a doctor to judge) that this procedure is rather an evidence of doctor"s responsibility and suitability to the protocol; however, it was performed in such a manner, and accompanied by such actions that became an opposite to itself.]


As to February 5, 2016, that day ex-terminators [a disinfection team or a person] - could come to us from 8.00 till 16.00 at any time, - and I (much earlier then was called to doctor"s office) have asked Dr. Sejean (through the nurse and the registration nurse) to examine me quicker because I have something a force-majeure situation. Pacing on the corridor (as I once again could not sit because of the dermatological-proctological problems) near the door to the office, I heard how my request was transmitted to the doctor. When I entered Dr. Sejean"s office, I have reminded him of this request, but he did not reply and did not manifest any reaction at all, and has not turned his head to my side. On the contrary, he has delayed his every time repeated paperwork before the exam for a longer time than usually.


On my verbal and even written requests about 1) the ultrasound test (it has become clear that doctor Sejean has simply deceived me at his office, just to show me the door from there, and himself appointed only the audio-test, no ultrasound); 2) nasopharynx" swab test; 3) a test for Mononucleosis and Yersinia enterocolitica infection; 4) MRI or CT-scan (a computer tomography) for identification of possible brain, nose, and vestibular mechanism injuries; 5) etc. - doctor Sejean has not even considered to give any answer.


Only with great difficulty, it was possible to me [I almost completely lost the voice by then] - to ask (twice) Dr. Sejean a question what to do with serum sulfuric jams in the ears (I have mentioned above that my former otolaryngologist"s nurse three times washed out the cerumen impactions). He has replied that the best (and thus - cheap) method for cleaning the ears: is to use the peroxide of hydrogen (Hydrogen Peroxid). He mentioned this method, without specifying neither the percentage, nor other details. Doctor Sejean has told that it should be simply dug in each ear with a usual pipette. Believing that in such a matter he could not deceive me in any way or deliberately do any harm, I have bought this solution in a drugstore and have dug it in my ears. I have felt at once a burning sensation, which did not go away for several days. It is not excluded that by such an "advice" Dr. Sejean has deliberately (in addition) damaged my hearing.


As to the audio-test, it is a special and complicated story.


The stout woman, who was carrying out the audiology test, has appeared a professional of the highest class.


She patiently and scrupulously passed with all possible checks on several adaptations - not only in a special soundproofed room with a baffle-board and trunk-call earphones.


But she already had in-advance-issued and prejudiced opinion. It was that I - as a musician - subjected my ears to the impact of very loud and strong sounds, which have spoilt my hearing. It became clear at once, from where, from whom, and how she has learnt that I am a musician and who has instructed her. Doctor Sejean not only refused to be more companionate, having received from me a compact disc with my own music and my piano interpretations of classical music; not only has rejected any sympathy for me, having realized, what tragedy (as a musician) I am surviving because of the hearing loss; but, on the contrary, used this information AGAINST me: to close - for me - an access to medical treatment, and - the main thing - to the diagnosis and to the reasons of this problem.


His plan, possibly, was based on explaining all pathological changes to my hearing by the consequence of the powerful-loud sounds" injuring impact; to declare these changes irreversible, and, thus, first, to direct the diagnostics on a false way; secondly, to withdraw probable diagnostic procedures as further as it is possible from brain CT scan or MRI, from an assessment of nose"s fracture with a curvature of the nasal partition, and from the blood vessels scanning to confirm or rule out the atherosclerosis, and to affirm that my one and only problem is the hearing"s mechanical damage by loud sounds, and this, allegedly, has nothing to do with something else; and, at last, thirdly, to close for me any access to medical treatment, doing an emphasis on the irreversibility and incurability of these changes.


But his insidiousness and hostility has gone even further. He, possibly, has instructed the audiology specialist who was carrying out the audio-test, or, maybe, assumed that my level of the hearing loss is slightly lower than what gives a chance to receive at least the hearing aid free of charge.


The assumption that the specialist inspecting my hearing has been definitely instructed and set up against me by someone - was confirmed by her unfriendly and frosty attitude (as if she was condemning me for something) from her very first word. Unlike doctor Sejean, this strong-willed, disciplined, and, apparently, honest woman did not show openly a notorious hostility, which she already had before my arrival, hiding it behind a mask of an official severe style, but, owing to, possibly, a positive nature, could not hide this hostility, which more and more obviously won.


Another proof of Dr. Sejean"s preliminary instructions was revealed by her formed in advance (even before the test) and ready opinion, and by her in advance prepared conclusions, and in the stubborn aspiration not to recede on an iota from the "iron" scheme of these conclusions.


For this reason, she met with irony (or with suspicion) any of my statement differing from these previously prepared schemes, up to the doubt in the sincerity of my words, and even to direct hints on mistrust. So, in reply to her question of, whether I participated, being a musician (about it she has learnt not from me), in orchestras or rock groups, I have noticed at once that the sound was never too loud in the groups where I played.


When I began to explain that participated in rock groups and was exposed to the influence of powerful sounds only BEFORE my arrival to Canada, and that to the middle of 2000-s I had no hearing problems, she has expressed an impatient mistrust to my words, and declared that my problems were caused by a sequence of the mechanical damages to my hearing in recent years.


When I have told that already passed the audio-test (in 2005), which by then has not shown ANY changes - ANY essential decrease in hearing, she has again treated this statement watchfully, almost with a doubt.


And, though she has seriously treated my complaints that often at the same time it blocks up nose and ears, and has carried out the additional tests related to it, all the conclusions, she, probably, WAS FORCED to issue within a framework of in advance prepared by someone scheme.


To what degree - owing to her decency and professionalism - she followed these (outlined in advance) instructions: only the experts can judge.


The report (result) of the audiology test (above) at the end of November, 2005: the proof that I "have not thought up" anything, and that, really, no essential decrease in hearing yet existed in the 2005 (which was challenged in 2016 by both doctor Sejean, and the audiologist): the first actually argued that more or less normal hearing till January, 2013 - are my "imaginations", and that my hearing has been damaged decades ago, when I played in the rock-groups; the audiologist, in turn, has reacted with doubt that can indicate a preliminary conversation with doctor Sejean.


Further - below - is displayed the result (report) of 2016 audiology test (3 pages).


Here is the "interpretation" of the hand-written audiologist"s text (pay attention that I did not manage to decipher some of the words):


23 Aug 2016,

Referral Information:

1. R. Ear blocked: yes. 2. Laryngitis: yes. N TN N - Ring 250 Hz, R - AC> BC L - AC> BC - Musician. Normal NTR. Exam - Audiogram - RTC.


Reason for this visit:

Feb. 5, 2016 ... EAC Comes Narrow? Vulnerable to close with when he lies on it. Family (doctor) testifies he does not hear well since April / May (2016). Took Septra in May [error: in June (my own remark: L. G.)] for 3 days, and experiences dizziness. Found it difficult to discriminate GDTECH - Patient felt CNS worked.


Anamnes, Case History:

Patient says he came to ER - told it was anxiety attack. Patient said he asked for CT-scan, carotid artery studies: "But they refused me". So .... has vertigo, but continues to have ... discrimination.


L. Hearing better then R. since May or June. Has hissing both ears since then, louder at time. No of % of earscach. Recalls no ear infection in childhood. "I do not remember".

Patient says he is a music composer, plays piano: "This is devastating to me ..." Hearing was assessed ~11 years ago at RVH (Royal Victoria Hospital). Patient was experiencing blockage R., "then they found nothing". Patient says R. ear "was blocked yesterday, but not now". Played in Rock groups for 20 years (played keyboard, mixed music tracks, says sound never was high). Was teaching music at college for 15 years, takes avopro, flomax.


Summary of Results:

L. Hearing is within normal limits 125-250 Hz. Mild Sensor/neuro loss: 5-5.5 KHz. Moderate 2-8 KHz. Discrimination at 15 DS .... very good in quiet. Fairly good in noise in English RB Words Lists.

R. Hearing is within normal limits 125-150 Hz. Mild Sensor/neuro loss: 5-5.5 KHz. Moderate 2-8 KHz. Discrimination at 10 DS .... excellent in quiet, fair in noise. Impendence(?) findings: L. Normal compliance, mildly NEG M.E.P. (-350 dbs). R. Normal compliance, normal M.E. Pressure (-10 dbs).

.... xable visible 5, 4.2 KHz, IPSI of contra both ears, elevated.


Audiologist"s Assessment:

... absent 4KHz. Bilateral High Frequency Sensor/Neural Loss, apparently ....

Discrimination for English PB Lists improves significantly with amplification, and ... on high frequency lists.

Patient does not yet qualify for a hearing aid under RAMQ.


Recommendations and Actions Plan:

Return to ENT RE high frequency SNUL which Patient believes began in April or May 2016 Patient will benefit from hearing aid use but this would be at Patient"s own expense.


(Next page is displayed below)


-------------


-------------


Now it is necessary to analyze the conclusions, assumptions, and data that comprise the official report of the audiologist.


First, it is extremely important that it reflects the harmonious logicality and internal connectivity of my reasoning (as well as - partially - the official report of Doctor Sergmini from April 24, 2015): in a sharp contrast with the reports of madam Priestley, Dr. Roven, or other doctors and medics, in whose statements (applications) I, allegedly, talked complete nonsense, and who ridiculously distorting and forged my words, and having attributing to me totally primitive, illogical, irrational and inconsistent phrases, which reflects their aspiration to present me as a stout idiot "slightly more clever than a dog".


Secondly, audiologist"s conclusions are identical to my own conclusions and the assumptions stated in the letter to Dr. Sejean from February 1, 2016 (sent to Dr. Sejean by fax approximately for half a year before the audiology test) [that - besides - confirms the logicality, connectivity and objectivity of my reasoning and conclusions).


In this message (1 Feb. 2016) to doctor Sejean I wrote:


"Dear Dr. Sejean! After having an acute laryngitis in January 2016, I am not sure about an ability to speak on February 5, 2016 (an appointment at 9.45, at St. - Mary's OPD Clinic). The only alternative choice I see is to describe all symptoms and suggestions in writing, in advance: before we meet."


And in audiologist"s report, we see such a phrase: "2. Laryngitis: yes."


In my message (fax) to doctor Sejean we read:


"Problems with hearing, vocal cords, and naso-oro- and laryngo-pharynx are accumulating for years. Around 15 years ago, I used to visit an otolaryngologist at Royal Victoria Hospital. I received a water flash treatment and went through an audio-test, which produced no diagnosis. I believe that I lost an access to this specialist around 2005 or 2006. After 2008, I often used to have my right ear blocked while cleaning the nose, or during an extensive and long physical effort. Simultaneously, I felt like a sore throat, and had to clean it, which sometimes used to unblock the ear. Later (since 2012), my right ear started to be blocked for hours or even days."


And in the official audiologist"s report we read: "1. R. Ear blocked: yes."


In the same message to doctor Sejean (1 February 2016) I wrote:


"My general hearing has also degenerated, forcing to hear only relatively loud and middle pitched sounds, merged with a problem to distinguish between particular verbal phonemes. That is causing a hardship to follow a conversation, and ruining my social life. Even in my native languages I can't catch some verbally pronounced letters, words or phrases, and the same challenge in English and French becomes a real tough task."


And in audiologist"s report - we read:


"L. Hearing is within normal limits 125-250 Hz. (...). R. Hearing is within normal limits 125-150 Hz. (...)" (It means that the audibility of sounds in a high and low frequency range is lost: and about that I also wrote in my message to doctor Sejean).


It is just a waste of time to continue further.


Thus, in general, for half a year before the audiology test, I estimated and described the hearing defects and its pathological changes practically in the same way as the expert of the highest class, who has tested my hearing by means of modern and perfect equipment.


The audiologist could not (had no right) to put forward the assumptions of possible treatment plan, as it is a privilege of the otolaryngologist. But I do not believe that there is NO way to treat ANY of my numerous problems connected to this medical domain. The singularity (a non-standard character) of this medical report (from my point of view) consists in the use of the direct speech (when the audiologist quotes my statements (in course of the conversation with her), as well as transmitted to her by the third parties).


"But they refused me", "I do not remember", "This is devastating to me ...": the phrases, which it was least likely to expect in the medical and technical summary.


It is also specified here that I am a musician.


Another unusual case of information presents in data, which has no direct relation to the audiology test:


"Family (doctor) testifies he does not hear well since April / May (2016). Took Septra in May [error: in June (my own remark: L. G.)] for 3 days, and experiences dizziness. Found it difficult to discriminate GDTECH - Patient felt CNS worked". ["The patient had an impression that it because of damage of the Central Nervous System".]


What is told here, confirms my statements concerning the dramatic consequences from Septra antibiotic, which administrating is difficult to understand in the light of the laboratory tests results, which have shown the efficiency of absolutely different antibiotics against the entherococci infection. This is just another astonishing revelation about the hidden medical regulations, which ignore patients" rights and the value of human life to please a "general" fight against the resistant micro-organisms, or other doubtful policies, like the "medical-assistant" suicide, which real hidden goal is to eliminate (physically) so-called "social ballast": i.e. sick, disabled, old-age seniors, mentally ill, homeless, and other similar categories of citizens, and to ease the related to them social burden. Thus is the point that we live in an epoch of a total dehumanization of the medical profession, which becomes the domain of the slaughterers.


This document - one of many similar evidences, which confirm that my descriptions [of Septra's deadly side effects (including my suspicions that their complication (as well as an impact of aggravation of the events on June 21, 2016) could render an episode of this or that brain trauma] relate to 2016, and that these statements (stated to my family doctor - from whom they were, possibly, became known to other doctors - otherwise the audiologist would know nothing about it): have been made right after the events in June, 2016.


It is necessary to emphasize that during the audiology test it was told nothing for my part about the case with Septra, and about its side effects.


There is one more aspect: permanent changes after June 21, 2016 (such, as hearing and vision loss, headaches, breathing and deglutitory (swallowing) reflex problems, etc.). Some of the medics (describing my assumptions and suspicions) reduces those changes only to the complications from the side effects - postponed for month - from Septra, ignoring or deliberately suppressing my other assumptions: that is a suspected brain trauma and all its consequences are MAINLY connected with what happened on June 21, 2016, though it could be accelerated or strengthened by the dramatic damage from Septra.


Thereby, the very similar cases on 7 January 2013 and 21 June 2016 (and, probably, on 3 November 2005), which majority of symptoms coincide, are artificially divided.


Such a thin and well thought over misinformation, only in the minimum degree destroying the truthful reflexing of my words, not exaggerating them and not distorting in the roughest way (as it did Dr. Roven) the logic sequence of my reasoning, could appear only at a higher level.


A unique rough lie reflected by audiologist"s medical report - and obviously not thought up by her, but obtained from some medical files or from the statements of other medical workers: is the allegations that I came to St.-Mary's ER (21 Jun. 2016) concerning a panic attack, when, in reality, I have addressed to ER concerning an unknown illness attack with an extreme vertigo and other serious symptoms (including vomiting, fever, high temperature, etc.) and the suspicion on a micro-stroke (or brain ischemia):


"Patient says he came to ER - told it was anxiety attack. Patient said he asked for CT-scan, carotid artery studies: "But they refused me". So .... has vertigo, but continues to have ...".


This is a pure lie! I never told the audiologist that I came to ER (21 Jun. 2016) because of an "anxiety attack". And I did not tell this to any other medical worker.


I did not address (June 21, 2016) in the ER apropos an "anxiety attack" (it is the baldest and rough lie!), but concerning a suspicion on a micro-stroke. I NEVER (see above) declared to NOBODY that have addressed in ER on June 21, 2016, apropos a "panic attack", but told that came to ER apropos extreme vertigo and other SOMATIC problems (including suspicions on a micro-stroke (or short-term ischemia).


ALL my friends and family members can confirm it, and it was also confirmed by my letters (sent on the next day (22 June 2016) and few following days) to friends and relatives (in which I described what has actually occurred).


It could - possibly - be confirmed by the official report of the triage nurse, which was destroyed, or simply was not given out to me by the medical archive.


It also proves to be true (through this audiologist"s official report) - that "Patient said he asked for CT-scan, carotid artery studies: "But they refused me". Why would I ask to check the carotid and demanded the brain"s CT-scan - if "it was anxiety attack"?


But there is one more confirmation of that the statement that, allegedly, "it was anxiety attack" is false: it is "Patient felt CNS worked" (the patient felt that it because of the central nervous system).


Though FORMALLY this phrase is connected in this document with an episode with Septra, it ACTUALLY is a sheaf with the following episode in ER, and, moreover, adjoins to the following: "Patient felt CNS worked. - Patient says he came to ER (...) Anamnes (...) "...


They are divided only by the heading of the following section "Case History", but there was not a great sense to divide them on different sections: it is obvious. The audiologist has transferred the next sentence to the next section just because there was no space in the previous section any more. Otherwise, this is the continuation of the same logic row of events.


But this phrase - "Patient felt CNS worked" - is much more eloquent, rather than only a denial that I have addressed in ER (21 June 2016) apropos a "panic", instead of well-grounded suspicions on a micro-stroke: because it was "pulled out" from the triage nurse"s official report from June 21, 2016, i.e. from this official report, which was, perhaps, destroyed (because there were no other documents on 21 June 2016 from St.-Mary"s ER in the medical archive besides the 2 pages of Dr. Roven"s records, and the archive workers have explained that, allegedly, the official report of the triage nurse "is absent in the system" and in the archive), or forbidden TO ME.


First, it is - obviously - not the audiologist"s style and, it means, this phrase is taken from somewhere.


Secondly, I spoke in this occasion (21 June 2016) occasion to the triage nurse about the suspected damage of the central nervous system, and, in reply to my assumption, she has blown up, having attacked me, which quite reflects the style of her interpretation of my words.


And, thirdly, I used the term "the central nervous system" (instead of "brain") the one and only time - during the medical exams on June 21, 2016 at the triage nurse"s office.


Whether not therefore all dates in audiologist"s official report are displaced for one-two months (i.e. are replaced for earlier dates against the real events): to take the chronology far away from June 2016, and - especially - from June 21?


But, if I suspected (concerning the complications from Septra, and concerning the events on 21 June 2016) that the central nervous system (brain) could be involved, and if I have addressed in ER because something happened to the central nervous system (brain), any "panic attack" is not relevant here.


There is no doubt that exactly for this reason they refused me a copy of the triage nurse"s official report, or even, maybe, have destroyed it.


So, the audiologist"s official report is an example, how one decent person is capable, without fully understanding that, to destroy the spiteful plots and intrigues only by her own nature. After all, the audiologist has obviously made a truthful (the whole lie in it was from outside, i.e. from other documents or someone's statements) report not for the sake of me (as she was obviously incited against me (and brainwashed) in advance), but it is simply because she has honestly and professionally performed her work.


At the end of the procedure, she has handed over to me the report filled on a carbon paper in triplicate form: for doctor Sejean.


The behavior of 2 security guards (one of them, possibly, had the Ethiopian or Haiti roots; and another, was, possibly, a radical Frenchman - "québécois") also testifies that something was "dirty" with this audiology test (i.e. that it might be planned in advance as a provocation). One of them followed me on heels while I was in the audiology"s office waiting room. If I used to leave to a toilet, or simply walked around, going on the corridor or in the next rooms, he escorted me to the toilet door, and followed me everywhere where I went. When I sit down, he stood all the time near me - as a jailer. When - at some instant - I attempted to exit in a pointed manner from under his guardianship, another security guard has blocked me the way.


After the audiology test, I, accompanied by the security guard, have approached to the lift, and went to the 7-th floor, to the hospital"s policlinic, where I left (for my file; in one of the secretariat windows) one of the 3 copies of the audiologist"s form, and, knowing well the hospital building"s plan, have come downstairs, going to an exit to hospital"s parking, known to very few people. When I passed through the door below, there I was met by the 2-nd security guard (who was already waiting there for me), who aggressively and threateningly gazed at me, and instinctively moved towards me. It was visible that there is a fight inside him between a temptation to detain me because of the hostility and antagonism, with a probable instruction "from above" - not "to touch" me. Eventually, he has regained the self-control, and has only passed by, having threateningly waving by his whole body once again.


As to the problems with the vocal chords and the frequent (or long-term) blockage of the nose and the ears: Dr. Sejean simply ignored them.


CHAPTER 13


August 24, 2016, Wednesday.


The audiology - a complex and all-round hearing test - has shown that I am eligible for a free hearing, that my hearing vanishes for 40 percent against even a slightest background noise, that all the high-pitched sounds were gone for my ears, and that I can hear only the middle and low frequencies. For me, a musician, it is a sentence.


September 7, 2016, Wednesday.


On Wednesday, it was my last meeting with Dr. Sejean (7 Sep. 2016).


After what has occurred during this rendezvous, I have decided not to go any more to this doctor.


This rendezvous has taken place in St.-Mary"s hospital"s policlinic, on the 7-th floor.


The appointment has been initially scheduled for 8:15 in the morning, even earlier than Dr. Sejean appears in the hospital (he began his work from 8:45 a.m.). Then (see the details below) it was rescheduled for 8:50, but I came earlier (at 8:20), so, that I was the second for the registration time. Only 1 person came before me.


At first, I have contacted the registry by phone, and my visit to Dr. Sejean was appointed to me for September 7, 8:15 a.m. However, when I have come specially to the policlinic on the 7-th St.-Mary"s floor to receive a card with the record of the date and time (otherwise my scheduled appointments just "disappeared" from the system), a card with the date and time (mentioned to me on the phone) was at first written out and given out to me, but - already on the corridor, by the lifts, - I was called by name, and a nurse has come nearer to me, and has asked me to approach to the registry again. There they have asked me to show the "card" on this rendezvous, which has surprised me and has put me on guard.


The nurse-registrator has taken away from me this card and has departed aside, then has returned, and has handed me over the same card again.


I have returned to the lift, and only at home, having looked at the card, have seen that the time 8:15 was crossed out, and, instead, another time was indicated:" 8:50" (see below).


Even more suspicious was that - when I repeatedly called the registry, - they told me again the same ("previous") time: 8:15.


When I have come to hospital on September 7, 2016, the same has repeated once again, as always: I was not accepted neither the first, nor the second - in spite of the fact that I was the first on time, and the second in turn (I came before all other patients, except of one).


Doctor Sejean in the same way (as always) has passed several patients before me (as he already did it before), and - as soon as I have appeared in his office, - he began the paperwork on all the previous patients (such a conclusion could be made because he started to speak at once with other patients - as soon as they entered into an office [and he called them in almost without making breaks between patients].


He did it in a pointed manner, paying absolutely no attention to me; he did not answer my greeting, and began his paperwork (standing by his back towards me) not less than 15 minutes.


But we will return to the previous events, when was I still sitting on the corridor, expecting that I"ll be called to the examination room very soon.


Seeing, as the nurse invites in all the patients (who came AFTER me and had a later (than mine) appointment time - at 9:20, 9:30, and even at 10.00) one by one, I should naturally ask myself a question why it happens, and my bewilderment is quite justified, so clearly that any most biased person cannot deny it"s reasonability. But, when I began to ask the nurse why they do not call me into the office, she claimed that, allegedly, my rendezvous has been appointed not at 8:15, and not even at 8.50 (as it been rewritten in registry), and not even at 9:00, but at 9:10, though I kept a record of the telephone conversation with the registering nurse, who clearly says that the appointed on September 7, 2016, is scheduled for 8:15 a.m., and though I was holding in my hands a card with 2 written records: 8:15 (crossed out) and 8:50 (added instead of the previous).


But - in any case - 10 minutes: it is not essential, because there is a case of a deliberate delaying my rendezvous for HOURS, as, during my every visit to Dr. Sejean, all other patients (who were after me on time of their appearance in the clinic, and of the time of their rendezvous) were examined BEFORE ME. [See the card with the scheduled rendevous to Dr. Sejean for 7 Sep. 2016 below.]


The "Card" on the visit to doctor Sejean (for September 7, 2016). It is visible that "8:15" was crossed out, and that below is written 8:50. The date digit has been changed to "7" already by then - when I received this card.


The spray, which Dr. Sejean prescribed on September 7, 2016.


This spray, which was already once prescribed by other doctor, has not helped me, so, there was no any sense to try it again.


Later the record about this rendezvous has disappeared from the hospital archive, and is not present among the official reports of doctor Sejean. However, as everyone can see, I present 3 pieces of the documentary evidence, and a number of other undeniable proofs that this rendezvous has taken place actually.


So, when doctor Sejean (at St.-Mary"s hospital"s outpatients clinic, 7 Sep. 2016) has invited 5 people, I approached to the nurse, and has asked, why they don"t call me to the examination room whereas I came at 8:20 (before me was only 1 person), and my rendezvous has been scheduled at 8:15 or at 8:50 a.m. However, the nurse has all the same challenged it, and has declared that my appointment is, allegedly, at 9.10. But, if even it was so, considering that doctor Sejean now began working at 9:45 or at 9:00 (the time when he has PRACTICALLY begun the reception of patients), it comes to an absurdity, as 10 (minutes): 5 (people) + me = less than 1 minute per person! (ridiculousness!). And, besides, if other people were late - they should pass AFTER me.


I explained this to the nurse, but my arguments have changed nothing: 2 more people were called to Dr. Sejean, but not me.


Besides, I have asked the nurse (and the secretary-registrator) to tell the doctor that I have some force-majeure circumstances today, and that I am asking doctor Sejean to see me as early as possible (IF it is possible). But the doctor did the opposite: he delayed examining me as much as possible.


When I have entered into his office, doctor Sejean stood with his back towards me, and wrote, ignoring my greeting and without answering.


Without saying a word, he has spent 15 minutes in such a provision, then spoke with the nurse (7-8 min.), and - then - kicked me out from his office after exactly 3 minutes of so-called "examination", not allowing me to speak and interrupting me (to shut me down) as soon as I tried to say something.


Once again, I will emphasize that there was no sense to call me into his office while he was engaged in this paperwork. It was possible to leave me on the corridor - together with other patients, who waited for their turn, - and to call me in only when Dr. Sejean stopped to fill all these papers; therefore, certainly, there was an element of deliberate and demonstrative mockery at the patient in Dr. Sejean"s actions.


When he, finally, has approached to me (7-8 more minutes having spoken with the nurse on subjects absolutely not demanding any urgency: whether it was easy to reach for work that day; how people have reacted on any (unknown to me) hospital news; how many patients are still remained on the corridor; when they "will pass" them (an adequate word in Russian translation!); what is the rate of attendance; etc.), he already had a "torture" tool with a tube in his hands, which he each time, without an exception, pushed into my a nose with a touch of brutality, and he intended to start this procedure (after which I could not speak any more) right there.


But I moved away, and began to ask him questions and to state requests.


He has ignored all my complaints: that it "shoots" in one and in the second ear, and that I feel pain behind the right ear, and that it would be good if he could prescribe me drops for the ears, which are often administrated appoint at such symptoms.


With irony and sneer, he met my complaints about the pain in the bottom of the neck (between clavicles), a hoarse voice (again) and problems with the vocal chords, and did not allow me to speak any more. However, ignoring his movement and intention to shut me down by the torturous tube, I moved away from him again - and have told that in last 2 weeks my hearing has degraded even more dramatically than before, and I already experience difficulties to function independently. The wavy character of my problems with hearing (sometimes I hear better; sometimes absolutely bad) leads to incidents and to the mistrust of people, leaving them in perplexity (provoked by their failure to comprehend, why in one day I understand their speech, and in another can hardly catch what they speak).


Dr. Sejean then has left me alone, turned his back to me, and, having approached to a window (which is far away from the examination survey chair in this big office), demonstrated that does not want to hear me - and does not listen.


Then I have addressed to the young white nurse who sat close to me, having told her that something outraged is going on now, - and have asked her to interpret my words to Dr. Sejean. I have asked to send me for a repeated audiology test, ultrasonography, and to carry out some additional tests and medical exams (I have listed them). Those days I have absolutely lost the voice, and almost whispered, instead of speaking, and has noticed that it could be a problem with the vocal chords, and demanded to start diagnosing and treating me.


I also repeated again (which already several times specified to doctor Sejean, even in the written messages): that the temporary deterioration of hearing and the blockage of sometimes the right, sometimes the left ear - comes at the same time with the voice loss.


But - the main thing - I whispered: this is my concern about the "shooting" in the left, and - is slightly less frequent - in the right ear, and demanded to do something in the regard of this syndrome.


However, Dr. Sejean has ignored everything that I told in the hoarse half-whisper, and have again reproached to me with the intention to carry out the same unpleasant procedure, which (as I have understood already from the second time) he has used as a punishment and has turned into a kind of a ritual.


I wanted was to explain, how it has begun. Besides 3 unexplained illness attacks - with an extreme vertigo, vomiting, and high temperature (and other symptoms), - which have ruined my vision and hearing, it was an anonymous call few days ago. When I have lifted the receiver, I heard crash and click sounds, and suddenly felt a sharp acute pain in the lower part of the left ear (to which I pressed the telephone receiver), and in several next days there were "shots" and pain in the same ear, and it hurts.


But Dr. Sejean did not let me to finish even the first phrase. He has declared with the raised voice that he does not want to listen, and right there has departed from the doctor"s chair, and began to talk to the very young nurse for suppressing my speech. When - after that - I have tried to bring up again that there is "shooting" in my ear, and that I need a medical help, doctor Sejean has raised the voice, and ordered me to "shut up".


Shocked by his behavior, not trusting my own eyes, I was in such a catalepsy that doctor Sejean, having used my condition, pushed the tube into my nose, and - for record-breaking short time have finished this barbarous (in his hands) procedure, then - without a word - have pushed me to the door and forced me to leave.


Thus, Dr. Sejean told me nothing, did not respond to any of my questions, and this was the end of my visit to him.


On the exit from the hospital, I suddenly felt badly. Something was wrong. When I descended down to the metro station, my heart has started to beat without restraint, it became dark in my eyes, and I suddenly began to choke on the platform, and almost have fainted nearly.


The sickness attack has proceeded up to Snowdon metro station, and then to the station Lionel Groux, where it became easier to breath.


I do not know what Dr. Sejean did, but I never had such a reaction before. However, I believe that this was not a stressful psychological reaction to Dr. Sejean"s actions, but some allergic or immune reaction to medications accompanied the tube insertion, and to this whole procedure in general.


It has occurred in the midst of a new drama: the close-angle syndrome has provoked glaucoma; the iridothomy did not help, but just caused a cataract; the corners have not opened; the intraocular pressure was not kept under control by Xalatan after this laser surgery, which just led to sharp vision"s degeneration, to problems of the nocturne vision, wild disphotopsia, and so on.


After this wild incident at Dr. Sejean"s office, the intraocular pressure began to jump up even more; my vision has sharply worsened, and other problems have become aggravated.


The depression, which already has almost vanished by then, has returned for other 2 or 3 weeks. The heartaches returned again, too. But the most frightening complications after my visit to Dr. Sejean were (in 2 hours): nausea; pain in the area under the solar plexus; sensation of heaviness and pain under the ribs; and then severe pain all over the stomach.


CHAPTER 14


16 JUNE, 2016.


Meanwhile, there is still no date on calculus removing with another doctor, and I am in the same emergency situation.


(In addition to other problems, and, in particular, heart problems, the organism can cease to tolerate Cipro at any time, and then this is the end, or the doctor will not be able to prescribe this antibiotic any more. I have only 4 days until the end of the current course, and no more tablets are present again).


(I did not demand to cancel, but only to postpone the surgery by Dr. Morris, but he cancelled it and threw me out from the list of his patients...).


On June 16, 2016, a message from the Lakeshore hospital informed me that the surgical operation would probably be performed on next Monday, early in the morning (June 20, 2016). It was also told in addition that - if on Monday (till 7:00 in the morning) nobody calls me, and will not confirm it, - then the procedure would not take place. Nobody called on 20 June. I had to contact them twice myself, but the surgery on June 20 was not confirmed.


Meanwhile, in the area of complications from side effects (and their complications) from Septra-antibiotic, the trouble breathing do not pass. I cannot define whether this is connected to pulmonary, neurologic, or cardiovascular nature, and, in particular, to the heart. While the heart worked normally, it was still possible to fight, but if heart failures - it is already almost the end in my situation...


17 JUNE, 2016.


Since the episode of serious side effects from Septra (with complications affected heart, and causing heartache, arrhythmia, tachycardia, shortage of air and trouble breathing, cardiac pains (in case of exercise stresses (physical exercises) increasing if I take a deep breath), and others cardiovascular symptoms - they did not pass.


And here, on Friday, June 17, 2016, I went to St.-Mary's ER with suggested heart attack symptoms.


I had to go again to this hospital, in spite of a number of provocations and troubles, because I was actually declared "persona non grata" in other hospitals, supposedly, in connection with the conflict with Dr. Morris, and was given an unmistakable hint that shall contact only St.-Mary's hospital.


The doctor in the ER did not manage to define what is wrong, but - at least - carried out all tests and exams (blood and urine tests, electrocardiogram and heart"s X-ray, the test on troponin and d-dimer).


I do not stop on details because, in my nonprofessional"s opinion, this doctor did everything correctly, having administrated the test on troponin and other elements (blood clotting, sugar in blood, red blood cells, etc.). The only thing that it is possible to reproach with - rather, the hospital, than the doctor: it is that, in case of many abnormalities, I was not assigned to any additional exams and consultations with specialists.


I already described, what happened on 21-22 June...


So, by denying me the ophthalmological care, Doctors Girar Basmadjian (the role of Dr. John R. Lewis in this whole story is not clear), and his clinic (St.-Mary"s Hospital"s Ophthalmology Clinic), and St.-Mary"s ER [October 23, 2013]; and Dr. Pierre Brais, and his clinic ("Clinique ophtalmologique de l'ouest") [13 November 2013; and ]; and (before this) the secretaries of 2 other clinics (who denied me an access to a specialist-ophthalmologist): they left me with a time-bomb, which inevitably had to blow up. After 3 episodes of the suspected attacks by a narrow-directed microwave radiation (accompanied by a number of similar to the exposure to microwave radiation symptoms, including an extreme vertigo), and 2 vitreous detachments - my eyes could not survive without the ophthalmological care, which was denied to me.


[Continued in Part 2 of the Book 3.]


__________


Lev Gunin


THE PUNITIVE HEALTH CARE

[HEALTH CARE AS A REPRESSIVE TOOL]

BOOK 3-2


WHO DESTROYED MY VISION AND HEARING?


BOOK 3 - PART 2.


THE CONTENT.


CHAPTER 1

CHAPTER 2

CHAPTER 3

CHAPTER 4

CHAPTER 5


* * *

The whole text of the chronological events and medical documents (under the name of "The Punitive Health Care - (Health Care as a Repressive Tool)" is available for examination only on the basis of the following contract between the author and the reader:


I (THE READER) GIVE MY CONSENT THAT, BY CLICKING CORRESPONDING LINKS AND ACCESSING THE TEXT OF "THE PUNITIVE HEALTH CARE", I AUTOMATICALLY AGREE TO THE FOLLOWING PRELIMINARY CONDITIONS [FOR READING]:


-- I am (at least) 18 years old.


1. I (the reader) is undertaking (commit myself) not to distribute the text of "The Punitive Health Care - (Health Care as a Repressive Tool)" - entirely, or in fragments; not to copy medical documents; and not to share the text and images without author' permission.


2. I (the reader) understand that the confidential information, which is contained in this text, cannot be used for any other [than the reading (extraneous; secondary)] purposes and needs, for any researches, essays, stories, etc.


3. I (the reader) commit myself not to sneer at open ticklish personal information (which sharing was induced by circumstances), not to savor any medical, physiological, or anatomic details, and not to use this text as a reason for mockery and persecution.


4. I (the reader) am warned by the author that, except for a number of obviously immoral (by definition) doctors' and medical staff's actions, other decisions and acts described in this "confession" are not subjected to hasty moral assessment because a) only experts can judge finally about their justification and fairness; b) explanations and vindications of other party are necessary. We also do not know to what degree the doctors were under an influence and direct power of police, Ministry of Immigration, and other enforcement agencies, political organizations, groups and persons - with their own ideological, economic, and propaganda interests, - and to what degree this influence impacted on their diagnostic conclusions and assessments of patient's state of health. Many of the documentary confirmed facts incontestably demonstrate that author's ideological stand (who's opposing to younger generation's transformation into zombie-biorobots with mobile phones on shoulders instead of heads; to electronic totalitarianism with its prison-like total video surveillance; and to the tyrannical political censorship) played nearly a major role in enraging the authorities and triggering the persecutions.


5. I (the reader) am warned that the author sees the main cause of the most dramatic (for him) events in the fact that the enforcement agencies and interested persons and groups managed to present him to the medical community as an individual incapable to evaluate his health condition objectively; as a health-consciousan (or hypochondriac); an extremist; a troublemaker; an individual obsessed with panic and alarm patterns; as a person, who is making unreal demands to the system of medical care - concerning his - allegedly - pseudo-maladies and exaggerated gravity of trivial indispositions. This smear campaign of defamation, scurrilous libel, and wicked calumny made impossible receiving an adequate medical care (and sometimes any medical help at all), and led to health undermining, numerous diseases, incidents, and unnecessary sufferings. Doctors also considered difficult to believe in continuous (not connected with each other) illnesses, with an interval of 4-7 days, sometimes rolling at the same time: as tsunami. They refused to believe in these sequences of illnesses' painful course, danger, and significance. This chronicle disproves such a prejudiced opinion, producing an incontestable evidence.


6. I (the reader) am informed that all negative remarks, characteristics, and facts' assessments belong only to the portrayal of criminal groups, extremists, and carriers of anti-humanistic, racist, and totalitarian ideology, but do not contain groundless generalizations and negative assessment of any country, ethnic group, or religion. The author is categorically against dismantling of any of the existing states, and against restrictions of the rights of religious congregations of any faith.


7. I (the reader) am informed that this edition partially presents the previous 2017 edition without any changes, and, thus, may not correspond to later view and opinions.


8. I (the English reader) am informed that some parts of the following English text of "The Punitive Health Care" - were translated from Polish, Russian, or French originals, and may contain primitive language, double interpretation, or puzzled meaning. Such confusing fragments should be compared with their originals in Polish and Russian languages (author's native languages) [2016-2017]; all controversial points must be resolved through such a comparison.


9. In the very last moment of this edition's make-up (April 2023), the author came across a description of so-called Havana-syndrome, and found same symptoms and complications, which he experienced when was attacked by an unknown remote weapon (3 Nov. 2005, 7 Jan. 2013, and 21 June 2016), and developed symptoms of post-microwave irradiation.


_________


CHAPTER 1


Summarizing the BOOK"s 3 - previous - 1-st - volume (see the Part 1 of this Book 3 of the Criminal (Repressive) Health Care, or Health Care as a Repressive Tool), I mainly blame McGill hospitals" doctors for mistreating 3 of my indispositions (3 Nov. 2005, 7 Jan. 2013, and 21 June 2016), accompanied by extreme inexplicable vertigo, vomiting, high temperature and leucocytes, and other symptoms, 2 posterior vitreous detachment, and vision and hearing degradation, connected to these events (I was denied any follow-ups, and my access to otolaryngology and ophthalmology care was de facto blocked).


Doctors - Dr. Chirgwin German, Dr. John Patrick Rowen, Dr. Sejean, Dr. Girair Basmadjian, Dr. Pierre Brais, and (it is not fully clear) Dr. John Robert Lewis (and St.-Mary"s ER) and Dr. Jean Deschênes: are bearing the whole responsibility for my vision and hearing drama. Dr. Pierre Brais has participated in ruining my vision by downplaying the gravity of my ophthalmological problems, and denying medical treatment, medical report, and follow-ups. The role of Dr. Jean Deschênes (an ophthalmologist) was not clear, but - considering my fax submission and other facts, - his participation of the sabotage of the ophthalmological care is almost obvious.


Without an access to ophthalmological care, my vision was doomed after all these dramatic events.


Here (below) is a short description of the drama that destroyed my vision due to doctors" (listed above) sabotage:


1. Vitreous detachment 2013 (L. Eye), 2014 (R. Eye): a) strong flashing (later weakened, just in a dark room, only with violent head side to side movements); b) dense network of floaters and dots; c) big black spot in the right eye (moving with the gaze), surrounded by a pattern of lines and shadows. 3 Eye clinics: no follow-ups, no prescription, no report on IOP and angles.

2. Mid-February (or March) 2017: headache (temples) + L. Eye strong pain. April 2017: strong headache (temples): 2 times.

3. 28 April 2017: I asked my family doctor about an ophthalmologist. He sent me to Dr. Rheum. May, 3, 2017 (IOP - 35 (L.E.) and 33 (R.E): Dr. Rheum (optometrist) sent me to Dr. Gans, who (May 3, 2017; IOP - 27 and 25, then 30 and 27) prescribed just Xalatan. (Seeing that Xalatan did not produce a desired effect, Dr. Gans did nothing and proposed nothing, except of iridothomy, with no alternatives).

May 3, 2017. On my way to the building of Dr. Reum's office (round the corner), the police car 26-13 blocked my way (Dodge, FLT4817). I was not detained, but was literally squeezed to the sideways between the police car and the wall. As soon as I passed the police cruiser - at this very moment it darted off and left. Police and security cars were indirectly escorting me to Dr. Gans" office as well.

4. Iridothomy (May 10): IOP before - 25 and 23, and 20 (L.E.) after. Complications: loss of clear night vision; "glamour" patch of light - left corner (L. Eye) + super-advancing cataract in both eyes. Before the surgery, the cataract was not noticeable (and not present: according to Dr. Rheum"s word and written note) + Dr. Gans said nothing about it before May 11.

5. Post-Iridothomy exam (11May 2017): Assistance"s office: IP - 14 and 10,7. She was panicking, claimed - tonometer is malfunctioning, and that the Doctor will measure the IOP. Dr. Gans 1-st time mentioned the cataract and has refused to "declassify" the IP results. I refused the R. Eye laser surgery.

6. While Dr. Gans was away for a week, I had pain in both eyes, suspected high IP, and on May 19, 2017, was examined in the Institut de l'œil.

7. 25 May 2017, in Dr. Gans" office: (Assistance"s IP results - 16 (L. Eye) and 15). Dr. Gans did not measure IP, said it was 16 and 16. He insisted on R. Eye's iridothomy, said I am in a great danger without it.

8. 31 May 2017: R. Eye Iridothomy. Due to inconvenient body-head position, considerable involuntary head movements occurred during the laser procedure. Same day, a strip of golden rays appeared left to a streetlight. On May 10, Dr. Gans measured the IP before and after the laser, kept me in his clinic for 1 hour, and checked the operated eye next day. On May 31, he did not check the IP before iridothomy (only after, claiming it was 13), sent me home right away, and did not follow up next day. He ordered to stop Xalatan.

9. 31 May and 1 June 2017: scared to stop Xalatan, I called Dr. Gans" office, asking for confirmation about Xalatan, and the secretary promised that Dr. Gans will call me back. He did not call. I stopped Xalatan indeed, but only on June, 4. Between June, 1 and 7, a strip of golden rays has started to disappear, and cloudy ovals to dissolve (if it wasn"t a subjective impression). However, after 4 days without Xalatan, L. Eye"s sharpness has degraded.

10. June 7, in Dr. Gans" clinic: the IP - 26 and 25. Despite my disagreement, and request not to do it today, Dr. Gans went ahead with the dilation for retina"s exam. (I was worried that the IP above normal + narrow angle glaucoma not allowed for dilation). He put 2 different drops (Cyclopentholat and Midriacil?). He mentioned a small nevus -R. Eye- (nothing else); claimed that the pressure after dilation "did not jump much"; ordered to restart Xalatan, and sent me home. Blurry vision and other optical disturbances gradually increased for 8-10 hours, and did not go away till next day. When the central vision cleared, the peripheral was still dim blue, like a blue half-transparent glass. Since then with every next day the vision obscurity was advancing. Since dilation, every evening a layer of golden shadow left to streetlights is growing, and since June 14 I mostly see the lights as multifinal stars of far-reaching rays.


New symptoms (complications) after:


11. L. Eye Iridothomy (May 10, 2017): cataract (if was before the laser, was not noticeable and was not noticed by ophthalmologists in 2013-2014 [so, evidently boosted by the surgery]), both eyes - "dim glass" aberration: L. Eye temple-side vision; a reflection in the lower part of the same eye.

12. R. Eye Iridothomy (May 31, 2017): a vertical rhombus-shaped aura of golden rays to the left of lamps or streetlights; "dim glass" aberration: R. Eye temple-side.

13. Xalatan stopping and dilation (for an eye-bottom exam) with pre-dilation IOP 26 (May 31 - June 7): a white reflection to the right of a light source (R. Eye); spinning rings with golden sparks around streetlights (both eyes); a rectangular veil of dim reflection on half of the visual field against the window (R. Eye); shadows on white backgrounds from black lines, fonts, etc. on the computer screen (R. Eye); fog and sand in both eyes after sleeping, and inability to see clearly for more than 2 hours after awakening. I can read now not more than 20 min.; then everything becomes blurry. Often - tears (R. Eye). When, 7-9 hours after dilation (June 7), the central vision cleared, the peripheral was still dim blue, like a blue half-transparent glass...

14. June 16 and after: vertical rhombus-shaped aura of golden rays right to lamps or streetlights - L. Eye as well; a rectangular veil of dim reflection on half of the visual field against the window (R. Eye); shadows on white backgrounds from black lines, fonts, etc. on the computer screen (R. Eye); fog and sand in both eyes after sleeping, and inability to see clearly for more then 2 hours after awakening. I was able to read now not more then 20 min., then everything becomes blurry. Often - tears (R. Eye). Spinning rings around streetlights and other optical disturbances increase now EVERY DAY! I believe that the sharpness of my vision is down.

15. Already knowing that the iridothomy destroyed my L. Eye and provoked the cataract, Dr. Gans still insisted on R. Eye's iridothomy, and went ahead with it, and even put the further treatment in dependence of it (i.e., my refusal to allow the laser iridothomy could mean the end of Dr. Gans' treatment), without proposing any alternative, like another eye surgery, cataract surgery, or an additional conservative treatment (in addition to Xalatan). The R. Eye's IOP was by then (10-31 May 2017) very acceptable (AFTER the iridothomy it jumped, instead of decreasing), and it was no reason or danger, nor urgency for iridothomy. Dr. Gans destroyed my both eyes for no reason.


In my case, the critical changes for the vision situation, could be provoked by:

1) the vitreous body detachment (both eyes);

2) the increase of the liquids" consumption in connection with the urological problems and 3 recent surgeries;

3) some lifting of the restrictions on the sweet products, white bread (etc.) consuming, [in connection with the excessive weight loss and the lowering of the arterial pressure till 40-50 diastolic, and sugar to 4.3. (In 2015 glucose began to rise; I went on diet, lost weight, and relieved the blood pressure and glucose (sugar); but, having undergone 5 operations, having turned into a walking skeleton, having anemia, I decided to weaken (slightly) the diet to align the biochemical balance);

4) after the final - not fully successful again - urological surgery, the liquids" evacuation from the body has decreased, and this was a predisposition for the rising intraocular pressure, but I sat down on diuretics only when "the fried rooster pecked".


And all this happened in the situation of no access to ophthalmological care.


NOW A QUESTION: Whether my attending physician, a top-class specialist, and, besides, a knowledgeable on glaucoma cases doctor, had to delay my eyes" exam for 7 days, or shall send (if was not able to organize an immediate appointment with an optometrist or an ophthalmologist) me to a ER? Whether the optometrist shall delay an appointment with an ophthalmologist for days, or it was obliged to send me (with such an IOP) to a hospital. And why he sent me to a private clinic?


I"ll continue with the more detailed description of events:


May 3, 2017.

On my way to the medical building of Dr. Rheum (round the corner) a police car 26-13 blocked my way (Dodge, FLT4817). I was not stopped or detained, but was literally squeezed between the police car and the wall, and was forced to the sideways As soon as I passed the police car - at the same moment it darted off and speeded away.


For the first time since my arrival to Montreal (1994), I came to a doctor who 1) practices in the Jewish neighborhood, 2) could be (himself) (apparently) a Jew, and 3) whose almost all patients are Jews. Though I am not a racist, and have no prejudices against specifically Jews or masons, I am at a greater risk in such an environment because of the nature of my former Immigration case. First, I thought to pay a visit to St.-Mary"s hospital"s Eye Clinic. But then I doubted a possibility to get an appointment there, recalled all facts of mistreatment and abuse right there, and weighed the circumstances, realizing that would lose a possibility of Dr. Rheum"s exam, and would waste the precious time. I was in a desperate situation. No choices were left for me, as it was an emergency.


Doctor Rheum had the intraocular pressure (IOP) measured: 33 (l. eye) and 30 (right).


This was a very high pressure, but it could be related to the stress in connection with the demonstrative actions of the police.


Such a high intraocular pressure could be also connected to the fact that, at the request of the optometrist, I opened the eyes as wide as possible, and extremely strained them. I thought that because of non-relaxed and intense eyes the result was not exact, but decided for some reason that the difference can be in 1-2 units, no more, and was hit by panic.


I was surprised that Dr. Rheum did not ask questions about an eventual history of glaucoma in my family, did not tell not to lift heavy objects, to drink less liquids, etc., at least prior to tomorrow's visit to the ophthalmologist. I guess, it was because of a strict difference between optometrist and ophthalmologist protocol, but, still, every rule has its limits.


Concerning the copies of the tests and exams results (which, I said, I would send to my family doctor or to an ophthalmologist, whom I should choose), which I demanded, I achieved nothing. The secretary herself contacted the Eye clinic, and sent the fax, arranged everything, and booked an appointment (strangely, the Eye clinic did not respond for an hour and a half (in the morning), while I was sitting and waiting; and later, in the following days, as many times I called, as many times the clinic answered instantly).


Literally, near the Snowdon Metro station, the police car 26-12 "cut" me there (Dodge, FJL4735).


From Dr. Rheum I was sent to an ophthalmologist in the very specific Quarter Atwater-Green of Westmount: an area of primary business and medical activity of Jews and masons (or Jewish masons). Doctor Morris who nearly killed me practices in Westmount, too. Both he (Dr. Morris), and Dr. Mark Gans (the ophthalmologist to whom doctor Rheum has referred me) affiliate and cooperate with the St-Mary"s hospital, and worked once in the Jewish General Hospital, and also are connected to the central Montreal General Hospital. Just in 1 block from the Eye Clinic (where Dr. Gans practiced) is a former Masonic center, later - children's library; and above, on Sherbrook street (a bit further): is a majestic main Masonic temple.


May 4, 2017.

A security car was like waiting for my arrival near the Eye clinic (Montreal Eye Care Associates, 4120 St.-Catherine West, 3-rd floor, Montreal, Quebec, H3Z 1P4), but was standing in such a position that I did not see its numbers.


In the clinic, most of the patients were the Jews. (Next day, I clarified that this ophthalmologist (Dr. Gans) - a Jewish origin, is a trustee of the programs of one Jewish organization).


Doctor"s assistant suspiciously long checked the intraocular pressure, repeatedly told me to move away, to sigh deeply, to approach closer again, and to put the chin on the holder, etc. It looked like she doubted the results, rechecking them again and again. We had an impression (both of us) that the IOP was so high or so low, or jumped so oddly that she did not trust her own eyes, and questioned the functionality of the device (suspecting that it dysfunction). Or (another possibility) it was just the theatrical trickery, but she looked too naturally worried and perplexed for this.


It lasted infinitely.


Other patients passed incomparably quicker. (The same procedure took doctor Rheum literally 4 seconds).


She told that the intraocular pressure was 27 (l. an eye) and 25 (right), and that I have a very extreme closed-angle syndrome.


The liquid (which builds up in eye"s anterior chamber and spreads from there) forms the pressure, necessary for keeping eye"s "fitness". That pressure should not exceed a necessary limit and not hurt the organ. The surplus liquid shall unceasingly get away through a special "dead end", the so-called "angle of the anterior chamber". (Where the iris of the pupil adjoins to the cornea).


So far, when this angle has at least 30 degrees, the drainage of the liquid works, but in case of a smaller angle the liquid ceases to flow normally, and the pressure grows, destroying the optic nerve and leading to a total blindness.


(And, on the opposite, if this angle decreases to 15 degrees, then the anterior chamber between the iris and the cornea becomes critically small, as well as the space between it and the Shclemm port).


It leads to a situation, when the liquid, which is worked out by a ciliary body behind the pupil, ceases to overflow freely through the pupil into the anterior chamber if the crystalline lens too densely adjoins to the back head of the pupil. Then the surplus liquid behind the pupil is pushing it forward, forcing to block the drainage.


It is possible to assume that the collapse of the vitreous - in my case - provoked it, and, being followed by the syndrome of a "plane iris (pupil)" - "Iris plateau", caused all the complications.


Dr. Gans" assistant checked both eyes for the presence of cataract, too, which she did not find.


In doctor"s office the pressure (IOP) was already 30 (l. eye) and 27 (right), which seemed suspicious since I managed to relax my eyes more, and did not feel any pressure. He confirmed the danger of acute closed-angle glaucoma, but when I asked him if the diagnosis is glaucoma for sure, he answered that it will be clear only after some time following the laser surgery of iridothomy. This was a pure lie. He obviously understood that I know it, and this was his real goal, because by refusing further tests and exams necessary for glaucoma treatment he actually forced me to agree for iridothomy.


Asked why the closed-angle syndrome could be developed, he said that it is a congenital anatomic feature. Then I noted that when in 2013 and in 2014 I had a vitreous detachment in the left, then in the right eye, two well-known ophthalmologists carefully examined my eyes at first in St.-Mary"s Eye Clinic, then in a private clinic, studying not only the retina, but also the status of cornea, pupils, lens, etc., and did not find any closed-angle anatomic feature or a probability of the predisposition to glaucoma.


Dr. Gans answered that it is impossible, and emphasized that my situation is very dangerous, and that to prevent the beginning of acute glaucoma this laser surgery (iridothomy) is crucial.


He checked both eyes with a special device (a slot lamp) for a cataract. I did not dare to ask him, since an absence of any comment made clear the absence of cataract.


It was obvious that the words of Dr. Gans that my problem was generated by exclusively congenital anatomy are strangely differing from the truth. Before I entered his office, he already knew that I had the vitreous body detachment (I told about it to his assistant) with flashouts and dense suspension.


In my case, the critical points were

1) the vitreous detachment;

2) consumption of the big volumes of liquids in connection with several recent invasive urological procedures (including surgeries);

3) some degree of the lifting of the restrictions on consuming of sweet and white bread in connection with excessive leanness and lowering of sugar to 4.3 and the arterial pressure till 40-50 diastolic; in result of the diet change, the sugar (glucose level) and the arterial blood pressure jumped up, and the intraocular pressure too.


And, while I reported the vitreous body detachment and the need of consuming of a lump of liquids to Dr. Gans, he could not but understand that the eye anatomic structure has nothing to do with my case, that the closed angles could be acquired, not inborn.


Dr. Gans prescribed only one kind of eye drops to control IOP - Xalatan, - and told me to come for laser iridothomy surgery of both eyes in a week. ("I would perform the surgery even earlier, but I cannot leave a patient after the surgery for the weekend"). It is very odd or even outraged that he did not prescribe additional medication, including those for internal intake with food and water to lower the IOP, which are normally used in a close angles syndrome emergency. If he did so, more time would be available to consider the type of treatment, a better opportunity to secure the optic nerve and cataract-free condition, and no urgent iridothomy would be needed. By refusing (on my request) to prescribe the additional medications, he literary forced me to accept the iridothomy, which I would otherwise reject.


It is strange (if not odd) that he did not warn me about the danger to lower down the head, to lift more then 7-9 kg, did not tell to reduce the amount of the drunk liquids, and so on.


When I stepped outside from the clinic"s door, a "security" car of Westmount "Public Security" Nr 905 (Dodges) slowly passed by...


Of course, I was shaken, but thought that, even considering risk of unexpected complications and effects of iridothomy (a laser surgery for the prevention of glaucoma), and the fact that only 44 percent of patients benefit from this method, while the rest are left without any effects and with a number of serious complications, I was lucky that this eye surgery at least will prevent the development of glaucoma. But as soon as I recalled all the suspicious strangenesses in behavior of Dr. Gans and his assistant and doctor, all the half-words and contradictions, and that this Eye Clinic is in Westmount, and Dr. Gans can be an "ideological brother" of doctor Brian Morris, I already felt badly.


I was feverishly looking for an exit for escaping of the trap.


CHAPTER 2


May 8, 2017.


From May 3 to May 8 Dr. Gans actually answered just 2 of my questions of 11.


This alone should alert me to the highest degree, and I should quit Dr. Gans, not seeing him any more, ever.


However, I was strike by the severe depression again, which returned because of this new drama, was terrified by being a patient of Dr. Gans and by the danger that he posed for my visual function, and, on one hand, doubted my own conclusions because of the lack of self-confidence, and, on the other hand, unconscious attempts to comfort myself by rejecting my own conclusions, which were too scary to bear. I did not find enough support from my close ones, who saw just suspiciousness in my sinister conclusions about Dr. Gans.


Thus, I just passively laid my head on Dr. Gans" guillotine.


However, I did few more efforts for finding an alternative solution. I decided to appeal to 2 ophthalmologists, who used to treat my mother and whom I could trust. I spent an entire day for the search of their phone numbers, hardly found one number, but the call did not yield any results. Even for booking an appointment with an optometrist, it was necessary to register for the reception in 2-3 days in advance, and after that wasted day there came the weekend (days off).


By Monday (8 May 2021), I was already so nervous and afraid of a plot and a trap - that it became difficult for me to concentrate and to continue the search of a solution, especially - to call somewhere, especially as the intraocular pressure required rest (not sitting in front of the monitor and putting the tension on eyes).


I said to relatives that I would cancel the laser surgery if the intraocular pressure (IOP) falls down a bit, but I do not trust the IOP numbers given by the doctor and his assistant, and would like to check the IOP (intraocular pressure) in other places.


Though my relatives did not support my suspicions, they helped me in search for alternative options.


My daughters continued to search for another solution, contacted all reachable eye clinics, but ineffectually, and, probably, did not understand my request to book an appointment to an optometrist, or waited for my signal.


And I was in such a state that I could not go alone (independently) to an optometrist, especially as I should ask someone to lend me 70$ (at least) dollars for this visit. As the total collapse of Quebec Medical Care System was approaching at a higher speed, for a person like me, persecuted by the authorities, it became a real disaster.


(It is possible that if I was stopped by police those days, or there would be another stressful situation, the IOP could jump up "to the heaven" - and the left eye gone: I had no proof that it is completely impossible to trust the indexes given by Dr. Gans).


So I held on till Wednesday, 10 May 2021.


........................


Now, let"s go to the some previous events.


In mid-February (or the beginning of March?), when I had an acute left eye pain for 2 days, I could not go to Emergency alone, without someone at my side, but my wife has refused to accompany me, insisting that I should not go to hospital, because it is "nothing", and it will pass by itself. My request to call our daughters, asking them to investigate online about the acute (very strong) unbearable eye pain, and other symptoms (I suggested that it was the rising IOP, which could lead to blindness), was also ignored: they were extremely busy, in a hectic or even dramatic situation, and my wife did not want to disturb them. A stranger lived by then in our apartment, and my depression (caused by the urological drama) came back. However, I do not blame my wife, because, since I started to address to medical doctors in Canada with the health issues, the doctors, clinics, medical offices, and hospitals: all have bombarded us (me - and my close ones) with numerous claims that I am, allegedly, hypochondriac, that I have no health issues, and that I just waste doctor"s time and medical resources. Any one, on my wife"s place, would - finally - react with downplaying the gravity of my condition. So, I blame exclusively the medical institutions and the criminal healthcare for her reaction.


All January and the beginning of February 2017, I was doomed to stay in bed (after the second urological surgery) with the unceasing bleeding (containing big blood clots (the most terrible and dangerous situation). Staying at home, I could die, but going back to hospital (again a catheter, which would make more port injuries) was not inspiring. Then I began to note, it seems, a shrinking of the peripheral sight (it happened, I touched the edge of a keg, pouring water in the filter, etc.), but such misses could happen also because of nerves.


Sometimes it seemed that the network of floating objects (left by the vitreous detachment) grows and that it develops the diffuse edges (then it could be a cataract), but then it - it seems - was not confirmed.


With the bleeding and pains I could not go to any oculist if even was not blocked an access to the ophthalmological care.


Then, to the middle of March (2017), approximately 3-4 week, I was in a complete euphoria. It seemed, I got out of a terrible hole of the annual urological drama, and - neither cardiovascular problems, nor something else - disturbed me. I tried to drive away any suspiciousness and thoughts about health for not provoking the return of the depression. And, probably, did not note how the problem with the vision has crept.


But then (at first) the cardiovascular problems began to disturb me again.


I went to 2 policlinics, to my family doctor: uselessly. I could not obtain any referrals to a cardiologist and on adequate tests (like an echocardiogram).


I think if I received a drug treatment in time - nothing would happen to my eyes.


Also, I could not buy Omega 3 and 5, Vitamin C, B2, etc. (which could prevent the catastrophe as well): it was too expensive for me.


Only in July, my family doctor sent me for a cardiogram (it showed an abnormal R-Wave progression, early transition [which never happened before], otherwise normal) and administrated the 24-hour Holster cardio-machine monitor (however, the doctor knew that I will not accept Holster and will not do this test). The discovery of R-Wave abnormal progression and early transition in the beginning of 2017 is evidence for the fact that I did not address the ER 17 and 21 June 2016 "for "no reason" (as doctors and hospitals were ardently claiming!).


And, at last, in mid-February or March (my initial note was somehow lost, and my memory did not reveal the exact date either) - was the first attack of sharp headache with the left eye pain. So the closed-angle syndrome started.


Though I told my wife that "it is necessary to run to save the eye", after all I did not go anywhere. (I even repeated twice that "if I will stay at home - the eye is gone", and again did not go anywhere).


But even before 2017, 3-4 times (in the end of 2016), it kind of "pulled" eyes; I suspected IOP, but could not see a doctor for that because of other health issues, and used alternative methods to lower potentially harmful IOP.


By then, we had no car any more (we gave it out to our younger daughter); a stranger was living with us by then; the panic of the emergency departments (where I was abused and mistreated dozens of times - and where they could provoke a heart attack or a stroke by putting me into an unbearable stress (which could also provoke a jump of IOP and to destroy an eye); and, besides, my wife just de facto refusal to support my intention to visit a ER and accompany me there: all this prevented me from turning to an ER...


It is impossible to tell, why - in my head - the access to an ophthalmologist was connected only to ER. I could contact a walk-in clinic, or my family doctor (I did it when it "reached" me, but too late), or Info-Sante, etc. So, I got an appointment with an oculist only after 2 more attacks of temples" sharp pain (but these 2 times without the eye pain). While the head worked clearly and effectively, it was much more difficult to kill me (or to blind, deafen, etc.). I lost a month or 2 months...


Till this vision crisis, I could read without eyeglasses, my vision was 100 percent - 20х20 (despite the vitreous body detachment and the presence of irritant "floaters" in my eyes).


However, to prevent a situation when the eyes were tired, I often put on cheap eyeglasses (from Dollarama stores). And here (some days before visiting the ophthalmologist) it began to appear that it is not manageable to wipe clean the glass of the eyeglasses in any way.


Now, below, I"ll quote the extracts from my "health" diary:


The Optometrist, Dr. Rheum (to whom my family doctor has sent me), a top-class specialist, told me that there is no cataract or severe glaucoma yet, in his judgment (he examined my eyes with the gonioscope and with the slot-lamp (cataract-checking tool), and, so, the optical nerve was not bent (injured) by then yet.


Probably, 3 attacks did not manage to provoke a "real" glaucoma yet. It is also important that he found glaucoma only in the L. Eye. It means that the R. Eye was affected by glaucoma in between my visit to Dr. Rheum and my visit to Dr. Gans, or because of Dr. Gans" mismanagement of my case. Dr. Rheum also examined my eyes by the slot lamp, and said that does not see any cataract. He did not mention cataract in his report to my family doctor as well (it means that the cataract was not present yet, and was surely provoked by the iridothomy laser surgery). [See Dr. Rheum"s report below]


When I discovered, who was the ophthalmologist (under Dr. Rheum"s referral), and where he works, I started panicking, because the clinic was located in the "spot" highly influenced by a satanic branch of a non-"mainstream" cult, and linked to another cult, which was cooperating with this one, and people - connected to this ideology - could be hostile to me because of the nature of my refugee case. The ophthalmologist (because of his origins and ties) could be potentially vulnerable to these people"s pressure, and, thus, could pose a danger. I described my worries and suspicions in several emails to 3 close friends before seeing Dr. Gans.


I also was taking into consideration that, after having so many troubles with McGill"s English hospitals, I should rather go to an ophthalmologist affiliated with a French hospital.


To avoid a non-desirable outcome, I went to CLSC, asking to measure the IOP and to issue a referral to an ophthalmologist. A very nice young doctor tried to help me, and even went to see her supervisor, but there was no possibility to issue a referral. So, she advised me to go to Emergency, said that at Rosemont-Maisonneuve hospital they have the most human approach, and even wrote a note for ER hoping that it will give me an easier access to an ophthalmological care.


However, this new health drama has triggered a new attack of depression, and my will was so weakened (not speaking about the grounded fear of Emergency Rooms after a series of abuses and harassments) that I just could not go there alone, and my close ones could not accompany me at this moment.


So, I was left one on one with the fatality of surrendering myself to a doctor, who potentially could destroy my vision.


The ophthalmologist (to whom doctor Rheum has sent me) misinformed me from the very beginning on a number of questions (for example, he told that it is possible to learn whether there is potentially dangerous glaucoma, ONLY after the iridothomy; that - after the closed-angle IOP syndrome"s attack - the angle will never open without a laser surgery; etc.).


Such wild, outraged and blatant disinformation, and his desire to perform an iridothomy laser surgery on me for any cost - have terrorized me, and I was in a permanent horror all the time while visiting Dr. Gans. However, I found no support of my close ones over my suspicions and clear facts about Dr. Gans, and had no mental force to go to a French hospital"s emergency alone.


Least of all I would like to accuse unfairly an innocent person, even without calling him by name, and would not claim that the terrible complications (that actually further destroyed my whole life) - dysphotopsia, severe glaucoma and cataract - were provoked by Dr. Gans intentionally or because of his financial considerations (negligence and "special approach" to people of my socioeconomic status). However, all the facts and circumstances are testifying for that.


Instead of considering another laser surgery, which would be more appropriate for my case, Dr. Gans has chosen the iridothomy, knowing in advance its useless (for me) and its particular danger in my particular case.


Instead of cancelling the iridothomy when the IOP was too high and too dangerous for such a surgical procedure, he went ahead, without even special preparations and special measures to secure a safe outcome.


Instead of reconsidering and cancelling the laser iridothomy surgery of the R. Eye, Dr. Gans, seeing that the iridothomy did not bring any benefits for the L. Eye, and only destroyed the L. Eye"s vision, literarily forced me to surrender for the R. Eye"s iridothomy, and destroyed my R. Eye as well.


Instead of cancelling or rescheduling the retinal exam, Dr. Gans went ahead and performed it without obtaining my consent and (even worse) having my verbal objection.


Instead of observing me during 1 hour after 2-nd iridothomy (R. Eye), Dr. Gans measured the intraocular pressure (IOP) right after the laser surgery, and sent me home instantly. Instead of verifying in 2-3 weeks [after the laser iridothomy] if the iridothomy has removed the need in eye drops (because the IOP did not fell down considerably, and the angles did not open), he ordered to stop Xalatan right after the R. Eye"s laser surgery.


Just this alone and several other things COULD lead to irreversible consequences, and - probably - led (according to the complications).


Only at the 1-st glance, his motivation looks very simple and pragmatic (haste of the doctor, timesaving (each of my visit cost him money whereas patients with the EMU private insurance pay HIM money); the hurry-working mode; cutting off angles; violation of instructions, protocols, rules, norms, requirements for medical procedures: all this had grave consequences for a patient by definition). However, with a deeper analysis, comes understanding that there are some personal or ideological, or political, or nationalistic, or other irrational and hidden reasons behind his actions, or any outside pressure that forced him to harm my eyes.


There are number of really strange (if not ominous) facts that can signify (theoretically) something more ominous...


For example, it is strange that the iridothomy of the left eye provoked the cataract in BOTH eyes.


After the iridothomy of the left eye, Dr. Gans, examining my eye with the gonioscope, pressed on it so strongly (right after the laser surgery!) that it surprised me. Theoretically - it could injure my eye, and even damage the optical nerve. (Later he always checked the eyes more delicately, even gently).


Or, for example, the fact that he did not want any witnesses on iridothomy, having said that it is dangerous for a visitor to stay in the office during the laser procedure, but my daughter ignored his warning (while my wife did not follow me to the laser surgery room (she was intentionally left by Dr. Gans behind), when the 2-nd eye was operated). In 3 months, staying hours in this small clinic, I saw that EVERYONE, without an exception, went to a laser surgery room together with companions, and I learned that the doctor told nothing similar to NOBODY. And, on top of this, he sent my wife away, and did not allow her to be with me during the R. Eye"s iridothomy, and she was not in the office - when I sat in an unstable situation - which provoked the involuntary movements during the laser "firing" - and could literary lose an eye in general.


When, during a period of time, I resisted the iridothomy of the R. Eye, Dr. Gans once intentionally uprated the index of R. Eye"s IOP to scare me (I can prove it): to convince me to agree for R. Eye"s iridothomy.


He knew (for certain) in advance (on symptoms and the anatomic structure) that the laser iridothomy of the left eye could trigger a severe irreversible damage (terrible dysphotopsia, cataract, etc.) and that the same (if not worse) - will happen also to the right eye. But he not only did not warn me about it, i.e. concealed the possible complications, but also lied that the complications are exceptionally a consequence of the quickly progressing cataract!


When I asked Dr. Gans if cataract surgery could solve my problems, he scared me telling that with my personal risks I should avoid the cataract surgery until I cannot see at all.


When, 23 October 2013, I was examined by an alleged ophthalmologist [see an incredible story of negligent and abuse in the 1-st volume of Book 3], the vitreous body destruction was confirmed. If it would be retina"s detachment: there would be the irreversible changes after so many hours of waiting, and I would lose an eye.


All symptoms are reflected in the records of the triage nurse, and it is marked there (from my words) that the flashouts and spots began to appear in the left eye since October 16, 2013.


In the final diagnosis, which was signed by Dr. John Robert Lewis (why not by Dr. Basmadjian, the ophthalmologist?), is told: the vitreous body destruction, but either date, or time, or doctor"s license number (apart from the data that was inscribed in the document heading automatically) are missing.


The intraocular pressure was measured only after my persistent demands. Doctor said to me that the intraocular pressure is "20" and that it is "an excellent pressure", which is within the norm. But actually such an intraocular pressure: is alarmingly on the boundary of the norm, and testifying about a closed-angle syndrome without glaucoma or with glaucoma, or an open angle glaucoma, or signifying about other dangerous pathologies. In one of the printouts, the IOP (intraocular pressure) was mentioned at St.-Mary"s Eye Clinic was mentioned as 25. Despite this index, despite the vitreous destruction, they did not assign any treatment to me, did not prescribe any eye-drops, did not put me under ophthalmologist"s observation and under the ophthalmological care, and did not plan any follow-ups. No cataract was found by then.


Therefore, I went to a private French eye clinic, but the same happened there, too. The borderline IOP was ignored, the retinal detachment was ignored, but the cataract was not detected.


No medical measures were undertaken; no eye drops or another treatment - was assigned in both of the clinics...


It was utterly clear (after the L. Eye"s laser surgery) that the iridothomy of the R. Eye is absolutely useless and that the angles - all the same - will not open obviously, but, nevertheless, he scared me so that I (because of the psychological problems due to the traumatic stress disorder, otherwise I would not comply) was forced to give my consent for the laser surgery of the R. Eye. He also literally FORCED me to agree for the iridothomy, putting the further treatment and ophthalmological exams in dependence (in exchange!) of my consent for iridothomy.


I repeat that, only on the surface, his motivation seems clear: he was doing everything according to the bold routine scheme, i.e. was guided by the official state methodic, in case that - if something happens, - to cover his ass (and my eyes did not worry him), and was also guided by the monetary reasons: without the iridothomy, he should check my IOP each 2 weeks or each month, and thus case (according to the official protocol-scheme with the iridothomy (though, in my case, with the boundary pressure and the closed angles at least monthly): once per half a year. And later, he got rid of me by formally transferring me to an inaccessible doctor from the state clinic, and I - in practice - hung up in emptiness, without any doctor and without any IOP checks and exams, which, in my case, is almost equal to blindness.


However, innumerous suspicious facts and events force to see something even more troubling in his actions.


For example, when he administrated a weekly break of the IOP-controlling eye-drops (Xalatan), he (right after this week and ignoring my disagreement) has dripped the myoptics into my eyes - though the IOP was 26 and 25. The IOP could be even higher, and could seriously damage my eyes, if I (having eyes-pain and other frightening symptoms) did not restart Xalatan after 3 or 4 days, instead of after one week.


Still, the intraocular pressure (IOP) has jumped up to 26 and 25 after 3-4 days of stopping the Xalatan: just the same as before the laser iridothomy.


Thus, it was confirmed that the iridothomy was completely useless - since the angles did not open (it happens at 30 percent of patients), and the IOP without the eye-drops remained at the same level as before.


Despite the abnormally high IOP and my disagreement for the retina exam with the IOP 26 and 25, Dr. Gans all the same put the myoptics into my eyes, after which the vision has sharply worsened, and further aberrations, cataract, and all remaining symptoms - began to progress several times quicker. And it was in addition to the cataract!


At next appointment after the L. Eye iridothomy, I told Dr. Gans about the sharp, drastic, and sudden degrading of the left eye"s sensitivity to the low light (decreasing of the nocturne vision); growing and annoying aberrations; spinning circles around the lamps or street lights; teary left eye; blurry vision and left eye"s vision distortions after 5-10 minutes of reading or writing; and about a number of others desperate symptoms, but he still went ahead with the right eye"s iridothomy, insisting on it even when I refused it once, and putting the further treatment in dependence of the iridothomy procedure.


It shocks also that the ophthalmologists do not warn that it is necessary to avoid heavy lifting, physical efforts with the head down, long hours of reading and computer work, etc.


It is tragic that, having a referral from a medical institution of the alternative type to the French clinic before the iridothomy of the right eye, I did not go to this French hospital, and, instead, went to another private clinic, where another ophthalmologist several times pressed on my eyes with the gonioscope strongly enough for considering not to visit her any more. And, still, I went to an appointment with her for the second time and allowed to press on my eyes even stronger, so, that by then the tears were shed from my eyes some more hours, and I saw nothing about 2, or 2 and a half hours. I don"t believe that she did it intentionally, but that (not only the high cost of the preoperational procedures, contrary to the promised totally free cataract surgery) has contributed to my decision to decline finally her compassionate offer of the cataract removal with an additional glaucoma surgery, which could solve all most serious problems and their consequences by then, and to save (at least) my right eye.


At first, she printed out for me the whole data of my eyes exams in her clinic, for showing it to Dr. Gans for convincing him to perform not the iridothomy of the R. Eyes, but a cataract surgery, but I did not understand that it was for Dr. Gans, and, tragically, did not show it to him by then. However, when, after the second laser iridothomy procedure, I handed these papers to Dr. Gans, he did not even dare to look.


Before the 1-st laser iridothomy surgery, Dr. Gans, seeing that I am resisting the 2-nd iridothomy, said that he can organize a second opinion exam, and repeated this proposal before the 2-nd laser procedure (the R. Eye"s iridothomy), but I stupidly declined his offer. However, this offer was given in such circumstances, in such a manner and with such a tone, which assumed this outcome. If Dr. Gans would propose this offer differently, I could accept it. Besides, he offered the "second opinion" only in the time (if he did not trick me out) of a hectic urgency, and (terrified by the delays connected to this "second opinion") I declined it because of this reason, too.


Dr. Gans has printed out for me the results of a number of tests, which was denied by a number of clinics and other ophthalmologists.


Dr. Gans has referred me to one of the best glaucoma specialists in Quebec and a decent person, Dr. Saheb.


Thus, concerning Dr. Gans, I cannot insist that Dr. Gans was affirmatively "a bad guy" - like other (terrible) doctors, who contributed to my eyes" condition. My judgment of Dr. Gans" actions is puzzled, as he behaved and did things in a very contradictory and inexplicably dualistic way. It was like if he acted as 2 different persons (a bad cop, a good cop?), which could be explained only by an external pressure. I know that such a supposition would sound odd, but it seems like Dr. Gans was not a bad guy and not a bad doctor, and did not want to follow a forced policy towards me, but had to obey in the end of every act of his resistance. Was it his clinic"s policy towards all needy patients; other financial pressures; politically motivated pressure "from above", or something else? I don"t know.


But, still, such actions as, for example, the refusal to carry out the tests and exams that I demanded (visual field, 3 digital imaging tests, etc.) BEFORE iridothomy: are appalling, independently from what or who was behind them: Dr. Gans, his clinic, or other people, organizations, gangsters, circumstances, or situations.


Interestingly, the doctor at another clinic, who printed out (for me) the data of the exams for Dr. Gans, was previously also working in the same clinic as Dr. Gans, and her name even was still not removed from their list of doctors on the wall. During one of my visits to Dr. Gans" clinic (19 July 2017), I saw (on the wall) the list of doctors of this clinic, and - among others - that doctor figured.


In next 2 months, the optical aberrations have directly amplified several times; the cataract began to progress even quicker; the right eye began to hurt and to see more and more worse after the iridothomy.


The visual field exam (6 July 2017) and the optical image scan showed far advanced glaucoma of the left eye, with a moderately serious injury of the optical nerve. The optical nerve of the right eye was almost not touched, but other problems (caused by iridothomy and eyes injury) were revealed there. Shortly before this exam Dr. Gans (trying to get rid of me), has sent me to another ophthalmologist, to the state clinic, where I was told that I must wait only for a DATE of the appointment 2 years!


Since then (after signing that referral), Dr. Gans did not scheduled any repeated exams, and - when I tried to book an appointment through his secretary, - has refused to see me. In other words, he bounced me to another doctor, to whom I could never get, and actually deleted me from the list of his patients. I was left without an ophthalmologist, without exams, without medical treatment and further preliminary measures.


With such a serious case as mine, it is necessary to exam eyes each 1-3 months, otherwise the blindness is guaranteed. Besides, the cataract was progressing aggressively, and I was already not capable to function normally. No one will do the cataract surgery through the private health care for free, though for other patients in my situation in Canada a free of charge cataract removal is normally assigned without problems. Everything could be considerably different if the preliminary treatment and essential tests were carried out not after, but before the iridothomy (now I understand that it was done for hiding a potential damage from iridothomy and eventual mismanagement, etc.: i.e. to leave no data to compare to). Then it would be known, which method and area to choose for the laser holes, or, in general, not to use the iridothomy, but to resort to an alternative procedure.


If a cataract surgery was immediately performed, and the angle would automatically open (in 100 percent of cases), and the intraocular pressure (IOP) was normalized (guaranteed: right away, or in one or two weeks), there would be no complications from iridothomy. Especially, as the problem of cataract can be solved only by the surgery and by the artificial lenses implants, the iridothomy would not be needed.


Summing up the results: it is possible to assume that (when I got to Dr. Gans (the ophthalmologist) the optical nerve of the left eye was just slightly injured, and there were no right eye optical nerve damage at all.


Dr. Gans, probably, has prevented the most worse glaucoma outcome, but, in the same time, has destroyed all my chances to restore a normal vision, did an irreversible damage to both of my eyes, triggered a potential (in the future) blindness, which, without additional eye surgeries will become inevitable, injured the optical nerve in each eye even more seriously than it was before the iridothomy, provoked a serious level of glaucoma, caused the cataract, positive disphotopsia (terrible optical aberrations), and, probably, cornea opacification, and, in addition, in the end, expelled me from his clinic.


There were other disturbing events concerning Dr. Gans" approach. I gave a more detailed record below.


In addition, I was sensing some danger from the doctor that I began panicking, and felt terrified as much as by Dr. Brian Morris. This is why I had a prevision of serious problems during the laser procedure.


May 10, 2017, Wednesday.

I was taken for the laser surgery at my younger daughter's car by my wife and my daughter. Right after the bridge via canal Lachine (a key point!), there stood a police car 15-86, which was engaged into surveillance very often, and which began to move forward in a slow motion as soon as we approximated.


In the Eye Clinic, the secretary told me that a laser surgery is assigned for me for both eyes, while Dr. Gans promised me - during my last visit - that would only do the iridothomy on the left eye first (as I demanded). So, I told the secretary that would like to operate only the left eye so far (where the IOP was higher).


In the presence of my daughter, the assistant again repeated 15 times (on each eye) the same strange performance: moved the holder for the chin, ordered me to make a deep sigh, to move off back - and again to approach the blue spark of the detector of IOP pressure. In addition, she checked the eyes for presence of a cataract with a special slot lamp, and did not detected cataract. According to her, the pressure in the right eye was 21, in the left 28 (still much higher then the norm). Nevertheless, it noticeably decreased in comparison with doctor Reum's office, and it strengthened my decision to refuse the iridothomy surgery.


With my firm intention to cancel the laser surgery, I printer out (in advance) for Dr. Gans, and, when met him on 10 May 2021, handed him over the next questionnaire:


1. The laser surgery - will it be iridothomy? Nd:YAG laser or argon laser? 1 or both eyes?

2. 2 y. after last vitreous detachment the flashing stopped, but 3-4 days ago reappeared again. Does it increase the risk of retina"s detachment or perforation from the surgery (or drainage"s blockage by debris)?

3. Is the present intraocular pressure still too high without special preparations for laser surgery?

4. Can a narrow angle widen naturally, when the pressure is reduced?

5. What are my personal chances for successful results and what are the most dangerous outcomes?

6. What is my kind of narrow angles? Is the iris bulges forward obstructing the trabecular meshwork or the schlemm's canal, or too close to the lens (danger of posterior synechiae), or there is a plateau iris syndrom, or another type? For some narrow angles with high IO pressure iridothomy is an emergency, for others (if the pressure was lowered by drops) it is optional.


He answered the 2-nd question that the risk is greater indeed, but it happened in his practice only once.


On the 3-rd question, he told that - in his office - the IOP pressure in the right eye is 25, in the left is above 30, but it will not stop him from proceeding with the laser surgery.


He answered the 4-rd question that the closed angle independently (without a surgery) never opens. This was not true, and I knew it, but was frozen and terrified by very high IOP indications to such a degree that was like hypnotized and incapable to resist, even if suspected that Dr. Gans lies about 25 and 30 IOP pressure.


He did not answer the 5-th question at all.


He gave the most suspicious answer to the 6-th question: he told that it will be possible to find out about my type of the closed angles only after the surgery (the same he said about glaucoma: that the diagnosis is possible ONLY after the laser iridothomy).


My assumption that he could considerably uprate the indications of the intraocular pressure that I did not come off a trigger and that the device in his assistant"s office was set up to show incorrect indications looks more and more probable with time.


Having read my questions, he said that he could send me to another ophthalmologist for an alternative opinion: if I want it. However, it was said in such a manner and by such a tone that made almost impossible for me to answer positively. Then he left, going to the office on the opposite side of the corridor, having closed there for about 15 minutes all alone.


In a situation when a huge crowd of patients waited for reception in the waiting room, it was more than strangely.


It is possible that he called someone from his mobile phone from there and asked his "superiors" what to do with me.


When he came back, I nearly answered "yes", that I wish an alternative opinion, and would escape the trap.


But I lacked for it a strong-willed impulse, and, on the other hand, I was deeply plunged back into panic by the indexes of IOP given by Dr. Gans, which required a high level urgency, and, like a last idiot, I said that I trust him, and that I am ready for the surgery.


Then I waited around 20 minutes in the corridor until the drops (anesthesia) worked.


We passed into the farthest office (my daughter with me), where Dr. Gans did not add any new drops (to the drops that he already put in his examination office) that allows to doubt that the pressure in the left eye was really above 30 (if so, the doctor should do special preparations, which he did not do).


In the last attempt to sabotage the surgery, I said that I am extremely nervous (I told it already before (to him and to his assistant), and that I am in such a state, that, probably, "am not fitting" for a laser surgery on eyes. I said that I am not sure whether I will be able to control the head immovability, and cannot guarantee that the head, front muscles, or muscles around an eye will not move.


Dr. Gans replied that he knows how to provide a "stone" immovability of the patient and that the first flashout will be false: to check whether a patient will move.


Then he (for some reasons) left the room for a while, and when he came back, he warned my daughter to close her eyes - just in case - when he initiates the laser beam. He promised to tell - when. But he said nothing, did not warn her, and, during the flashouts, she remained sitting near the wall to the right of the laser device with open eyes. Such an inexcusable negligence does not match the status of a serious and responsible doctor, which, perhaps, means that there was no danger, and he just bluffing again.


There were only 3 flashouts; I experienced a short pain.


It seemed to me that whether I deviated, whether the laser beam just "by itself" struck twice not the same place. It forced me to be terrified.


Again, in another office - Dr. Gans inspected the eye, and told that, unfortunately, the angle did not change, but the IOP (pressure) fell at once to 20. In his judgment, it was "an excellent result".


He ordered me to sit on a corridor, and, after 15 minutes, again measured the intraocular pressure, without having reported about the results any more.


When I asked what exactly the IOP now, he only reported that it is "normal".


Both times, he again carefully examined my eyes with all the diagnostic instruments. And, concerning the angle of the anterior chamber, which did not open, he noted that I have, probably, "a plateau syndrome". (So, if to follow the logic of tone by which it was told, the surgery was certainly senseless in advance).


He prescribed the anti-inflammatory drops, and tried to persuade me to agree for the laser iridothomy of the right eye today, right now. He added that if I leave, so he will understand that I decided not to operate another eye.


He said nothing about any precautions or about any contraindications (including prohibition on heavy lifting and restriction of amount of the drunk liquid, etc.); and even advised to walk much (!).


It was very strange, as he was obliged - according to the protocol, according to the rules - to sound all contraindications, or - at least - to hand me an information leaflet.


At home, I noted a white-silvery plaque spot when looked at light by the operated eye. In the dark, this eye saw almost nothing. And I always had a phenomenal nocturne vision, and could distinguish in the dark (especially by the left eye) such parts and objects, which are unavailable to the sight of any ordinary person.


The surgery was already a catastrophe. It did not get any result (the closed angle of eye"s anterior chamber did not open); the clarity of the nocturne vision disastrously decreased; a whitish spot appeared in the panorama of the left eye vision against the background of light.


Dr. Gans has destroyed my eye, to that having performed a certainly ineffectual operation. It became clear to me that this doctor is a great specialist, and I already knew that he, besides, an author or a coauthor of about 10 scientific works and articles. It became clear that he exaggerated the risks and artificially generated my fears to intimidate me to be sure that I do not refuse the laser iridothomy surgery, and, probably, uprated the indexes of the intraocular pressure. He probably foreknew that the surgery is useless, but answered my question about the alternative methods of lowering the intraocular pressure (to avoid a surgery) that they do not exist.


Only now it reached me that I made a fatal mistake. Instead of indulging in panic and to urgently looking for another doctor, I shall read, first of all, everything about the urgent measures on bringing down the intraocular pressure! If I would succeeded, then I could gain weeks or even couple months, and not to do the surgery, and, meanwhile, consult 2 or 3 other ophthalmologists.


Dr. Gans" prescription, 10 May 2021.

This choice of steroids could contribute

to the damage to my eyes (possibly). (?)


Thursday, May 11, 2017.

For the next day, Thursday, May 11, 2017, I went for another exam to the Eye Clinic on the car, accompanied by my wife and my daughter again. The police car 15-12 was placed on Atwater Street at key point.


In Dr. Gans" assistant's office an already familiar performance happened again. Only this time both my eyes were relaxed, and I did not need "a deep sigh", and I already worked out the correct skills in placing correctly the chin and the forehead. Therefore, all numerous "runs", commands to lean off back, to make "a deep sigh": looked absolutely senseless.


The device showed the IOP in the left eye as 14, in the right eye as 10.7. And then the assistant suddenly began to panic, told that it is something unusual, that something is going on with this device, and ran out from the office in panic.


When she returned, she told that pressure will be measured exclusively by the doctor in his office. (That is - actually nullified the results in her office).


The doctor invited me in his office where I sat very long, in comparison with the previous times. My daughter was forced to leave since time was running out, and my wife did not think to enter the office.


First, Dr. Gans has measured the intraocular pressure. I asked him twice what the indexes are, and, both times, he answered that they are within a norm. When I demanded to give - after all - the concrete numbers, he changed the subject of our conversation. When he asked me how I am doing, I answered that absolutely badly can see in the dark. Dr. Gans said that it will pass since the pupil is still narrowed after the surgery. When the pupil size is restored (in couple of days) - the nocturne vision shall be restored. (However, this never happened!).


Examining my eyes, he asked what else disturbs me, and then I told about the grease spot moving together with the movement of a look.


"This is, - said Dr. Gans, continuing the exam by the slot lamp, - because you have a cataract in the left and in the right eye".


This phrase just knocked me down.


I asked about the right eye, and he nodded. I asked again "and the right eye too?". The doctor confirmed.


It is amazing how and by what tone it was reported: "That"s because you have a cataract in both eyes". I.e. both the logic, and the syntax structure of this phrase did not leave any doubt that it was told about a long ago acquired cataract, otherwise it would be told "that"s because you acquired a cataract ...".


I asked him why he told nothing about this earlier, while he and his assistance have examined my eyes by the slot lamp twice. No response followed this question though it (as well as his refusal to give the concrete digits-indexes of the intraocular pressure) clearly demonstrated his wrongdoing on the level of possible serious medical crimes.


At the same moment, the doctor kindly invited me to pass on the corridor.


If all previous times he did not hurry anywhere, and was interested at the end of each exam whether I have more questions, then this time he abruptly interrupted our communication to avoid any further possible inquiries.


And there are remained a lot of other questions.


If Dr. Gans said nothing about the cataract - whether it means that it was acquired just now (was a complication of the laser surgery)?


A further question: was it a complication inflicted by the severe IOP attack (which was not treated by Dr. Gans seriously), or by laser surgery? Whether there is a cataract in the right eye, too, or the doctor dissembles? If the cataract was provoked by a laser beam, then how it could produce a cataract in the right eye, which was not operated? Whether it was possible? If the cataract was created by the laser 10-15 hours ago since yesterday, could, at the same time, the intraocular pressure fell below limits?


May 25, 2017.

Dr. Gans urged me to agree for laser iridothomy of the right eye, but I demanded to postpone it to the next week, for May 31, 2017.


Dr. Gans tried to scare and to "intimidate" me, emphasizing several times that I am in a big danger if the iridothomy will not be done urgently (today), and that I am lucky that SO FAR I did not lose my sight on the right eye, and that "you should not drag good luck for a tail".


The assistant checked the intraocular pressure, it was: the left eye - 16, right - 15. It turned out that the pressure in not operated eye is again lower that in the operated. There is a question: why then to do the iridothomy? In his office, Dr. Gans did not begin to do repeated measurements of IOP, and (at my request) only sounded the pressure indexes (reading recording of the assistant): 16 and 16. I asked again "15 and 16"? But he repeated again: 16 and 16. I see: he intentionally changed the pressure index in the right eye from 15 to 16 "for my benefits" that I did not doubt the necessity of the laser surgery. But whether it was possible to trust such a doctor?


(I also asked why he did not tell about the cataract right away, May 4, 2017, but only on the next day after the first laser iridothomy (on May 11, on Thursday): whether it means that the cataract arose as a complication from the surgery or from an attack of closed-angle glaucoma? According to him, in his records the presence of cataract was marked already before May 5. I demanded the precise date, but he did not want to disclose it. Then I said that even if the cataract was presented, I did not note it, and, only after the first iridothomy, there suddenly appeared white and transparent obscured areas in the view. He answered nothing...).


May 31, 2017.

The second laser iridothomy - the right eye was operated.


Unlike all other times, the assistant did not examine my eyes and did not measure the intraocular pressure. Dr. Gans did not measure the intraocular pressure either. When I asked why, he told that there is no need in it. "And what if the IOP is 30 or above, which is a contraindication for a surgery", - I demanded. Instead of answering my question, he asked: "Well, what we will do?". I said: "You are the doctor; it is up to you what to do". He replied that he does not want to put pressure upon patients. I said that he told me last time that I am in a big danger without iridothomy, and he repeated this again. "Then, - I said, - I have no choice?", and gave up.


Before the 1-st laser surgery, my younger daughter came with me into the office; she adjusted the height of the stool and the holders. Unlike the first time, I went for the 2-nd laser eye surgery alone (the doctor took me there through another office, where - it is strange - the assistant of another doctor was sitting with her patient, so my wife was lagged behind, and could not get into the office together with me).


There was an impression that he led me to the room of the laser device intentionally through another office (and not along the corridor) for leaving my wife behind and prevent her from entering the eye surgery office. Seeing that I hesitate and may call my wife, Dr. Gans said that it is dangerous for her to be present in the room during the laser surgery. My wife then bypassed around - and was going to come with me into an office, but I told that it can be dangerous to her, and she remained outside. It served me a bad service.


But what if Dr. Gans told a lie, and there was no danger to someone, who is present in a laser eye surgery room, what if it is not dangerous at all? If my wife entered with me, she could (as last time my daughter) help me to sit down stabile, so that my head was in a convenient position, and could not move.


I, unfortunately, could not sit down and place the head on holders in a convenient way. And from the very beginning, something went wrong...


As well as before the first transaction, I warned Dr. Gans that I am afraid of involuntary movements of the head, and asked that the doctor himself put me so that the head relied most steadily.


During the 2-nd laser eye surgery I - at first - supported my head exclusively by the holder for the chin, but the doctor corrected nothing, hurried me, and I was led on it. During the first flashouts my head moved, it was a catastrophe (I could be left generally without an eye). Then, at my request, the doctor brought to my forehead the second holder, but it was too high, and the head all the same kept unstably.


At first, I asked whether I should sit down closer, or like normal. The doctor told that it is necessary to sit closer, "rather close". I put the chin on the lower holder, but the upper was too high me too, and I could not lean my forehead on anything. Meanwhile, the doctor hurried me, creating an ambiguous and awkward situation, and I was led on it, giving up to his demands and saying that I am ready (while I was not). It was almost a catastrophe. Not supported by both holders, the head began to deviate after the first flashout. Then the doctor lowered the upper holder, and I leaned on it my forehead, but it still was rather too high, all the same above the forehead, and my position remained unstable. And, despite my announcement that I am not ready again, the doctor gave a new flashout (a real or a test one) - and then a new laser ray. And so he proceeded until I counted 7 flashouts.


Thus, despite my warnings that I am not ready yet, the doctor started over "shooting" again, and, probably, the cornea or the capsule of the crystalline lens sustained damage. Why he refused to bring his assistant for the 1-st and the 2-nd iridothomy, which could prevent a deadly outcome from the surgeries, because the left eye probably was injured as well due to the trembling of the forehead muscle, which pulled precisely during the last flashout, and, after the surgery, a white flare appeared and became permanent to the left of the vision.


Why, already knowing about the probability of my involuntary movements, Dr. Gans so negligently treated the preparation of my steady and solid position. Why he did not measure the IOP prior to the 2-nd laser surgery? When I asked why, he answered that it is "unimportant". And how then to compare what pressure was BEFORE the surgery? What if there was such an intraocular pressure, which contraindicated the surgery? What if Dr. Gans did not measure the IOP on 31 May 2017 because was sure that it was law enough, and that, seeing this, I would refuse the iridothomy? I had to refuse the iridothomy until he measures the IOP, but I had no will and psychic force for that because of the depression and panic.


Later I saw Dr. Gans taking patients to the laser surgery room, accompanied by companions (probably, their close ones) and by Dr. Gans" assistant. Of course, if Dr. Gans" assistance was in the room, she could adjust the holders and help me to remain in a more stable position. He definitely did not want to have any witness in the room during his laser surgery for my eyes, and this alone is evidence that he deliberately did something wrong and destroyed my eyes on purpose.


During next 3 years, I never heard about 7 laser strikes during the iridothomy. Normally, there are 2-3 flashouts, not more.


After the iridothomy, I began to see a golden strip glow when I look at the strong luminous source by the right eye. It was not there BEFORE the laser surgery. So, after both laser surgeries, both the left and right eye suffered.


If, right after iridothomy, I could see on the left operated eye, though not really good, this time the right eye saw nothing. Dr. Gans examined the eye, and said that the angle did not open, but the pressure (if it is possible to believe) fell up to 13. He said that as far as he sees no complications should be from the iridothomy. He demanded that I stop Xalatan for a week (for the following week): to see whether the intraocular pressure will keep on 13-15, or will reach 20 again. In the first case, Xalatan is not needed any more.


I asked whether it is not dangerous to stop Xalatan right after the laser surgery: maybe, it is worth waiting at least another week or more. I also said that, as I know, the complete effect of the IOP lowering drops in many cases (in mine: for sure) appears only in one or one and a half months. Thus, is it better to wait at least 2-3 weeks of Xalatan therapy, and only then to try to stop Xalatan?


He answered that after 3-4 weeks there can be a steady accustoming to the eye-drops, and then it will be already too late to stop them. (Only much later, I discovered that he did not tell the truth).


Already on the way home, I bethought that forgot to ask about organizing (for me) the measurement of IOP at least 2 times within a week after the right eye surgery. And the order to stop Xalatan right after the surgery not really was pleasant to me. Then I called Dr. Gans" office, under the pretext that I, allegedly, am not sure that I correctly understood the instructions of Dr. Gans, and asked to confirm if I have to stop Xalatan for one eye, which was earlier operated, or for both. But the Dr. Gans did not call me back. Next day (Thursday), I called the Eye Clinic on St.-Catherine again. After all, if the stopping of drops would suddenly lead to an irreversible negative effect - then he can claim that said nothing about the stoppage of drops... Probably, that"s why he never called me back.


At first, I decided that, if Dr. Gans will not confirm it by phone (and I decided to record this telephone conversation) that he ordered to stop Xalatan, I will continue to put it in both eyes still at least a week, having ignored his order, and will justify myself later by the fact that he did not confirm it on the phone. But he managed scare me by his phrase about "accustoming" and by other methods that - since Sunday or Monday - I stopped Xalatan. Thus, instead of 7 days, I did not use Xalatan just 4 or 5 days.


Both surgeries only worsened my vision, which was before 20 x 20 (i.e. 100 percent). The sharpness (acuity) of vision almost did not suffer (after the left eye surgery). In first weeks (or 1-2 months) the visual acuity was bearable, but already by then (right after the iridothomy) the left eye became worse to see on 1 size of letters.


CHAPTER 3


1 June 2017. (Thursday).

Sudden deterioration occurred on 1 June 2017. Blurry vision, more whitish clouds in the visual field, quick eyes fatigue, further degradation of the visual acuity, a sharp worsening of the visual aberrations at night, and the decline of the nocturne vision: all this happened, perhaps, because Dr. Gans" order to stop Xalatan.


I felt a palpable pressure on both eyes, and suggested that the IOP has jumped to the limits again. Gently pressing on one and another eye by the tips of the fingers, I felt that the eyeballs became firm and hard, which indicated an elevated IOP as well.


However, I did not rush to an optometrist and did not restarted Xalatan, because, after the disaster in result of Dr. Gans" deliberate damage to my visual function and fear that overtook me when I realized that the medics (except of few rare Muslim doctors) only sabotage any medical help to me (or, even worse: do irreversible harm), I was broken and destroyed by terror.


6 June 2017. (Tuesday)

An unknown lady contacted me by phone, and told that she is a cataract eye surgeon, and that my cataract surgery is scheduled for tomorrow, and that she will perform this operation. Instead of asking who she were and from what clinic she"s calling, I only replied that I know nothing about a cataract surgery, and that for tomorrow an appointment with my treating ophthalmologist is scheduled. Later I "punched" the phone number (from which this phone call was made), and it turned out that it was not a clinic, but a private residence. This bizarre event is just another evidence that something really unusual was going on around my vision problems concerning the ophthalmological care.


7 June 2017. (Wednesday)

When I came on June 7 to Dr. Gans" Eye Clinic, the assistant had the IOP indexes in her office at first 30 (left) and 28 (right), then (the second measurement) 26 (left) and 25 (the right eye).


And, as - in case of closed-angle glaucoma - the intraocular pressure can jump up harshly and instantly, it is possible that for the passed 5 days without Xalatan at some point it reached 35, or even 40 and above...


In his office, Dr. Gans" refused (which time already!) to disclose for me the concrete indexes of the intraocular pressure: both those that were in his assistant"s office and those, which were measured by him in his room. He already repeatedly refused to disclose for me the digits of the IOP indications innumerous times! He only told that the pressure is higher then expected and, therefore, I must restart Xalatan.


When I understood that Dr. Gans probably (I was not sure yet, and he did not clearly announced it) going to perform a retinal test with the dilation, I said that the dilation can provoke a glaucoma attack and to aggravate the cataract, permanently increasing the optical aberrations, and that if some of the procedures require dilation, other may be performed with OPTOMAP. But Dr. Gans did not comment my statement, and just silently went ahead with the retinal exam.


(The end of the extract of my personal "health" diary.)


Hear begins the continuation of the more general (and summarized) description of what happened during the treatment by Dr. Gans.


So, before the iridothomy (10 May 2017), I told Dr. Gans that I am afraid of a laser surgery to such a degree that could not control the involuntary muscular and head movements. I told him that I would not be in such a panic if another type of an eye surgery would be offered to me. But Dr. Gans just ignored my warnings, and went ahead with the procedure. The outcome was very sad. The angle did not open (it means that the iridothomy surgery was useless); the pressure fell down to 20, but began to build up very soon again.


During the procedure the front muscle has trembled: on last (of 3) laser "shots". An ophthalmologist, a consultant online, wondered, why 3 laser shots were needed. 3 laser shots without any pause (break) between them: could theoretically damage the lens and cause the cataract. And during the 2-nd (R. Eye) iridothomy laser surgery, Dr. Gans fired 7 (!) laser shots in a row!


Right after the laser procedure, Dr. Gans put an ocular lens-gonioscope (to examine the optical nerve, etc.), and pressed on the eye (just operated!) so hard that sparks have flight from it, and the hail of tears poured down. With the same instrument, he inspected my right eye. He measured the intraocular pressure (IOP) immediately after the laser surgery and (repeatedly) 15 min. later. Then I spent a total hour in the clinic, but only because Dr. Gans insisted on an immediate iridothomy of the second (right) eye; he did not measure the IOP any more.


I refused the iridothomy of the right eye for a number of reasons (also because I wanted to compare the post-iridothomy vision of the left eye with the right eye"s vision).


Dr. Gans insisted on an immediate R. Eye"s iridothomy very aggressively, and (as I understood) used the whole hour of post-surgery waiting not for my safety (or for following the strict protocol requirements), but for multiple attempts to force me to agree for the second iridothomy.


Next day, Thursday, May 11, 2017: Dr. Gans examined my eyes in the clinic. As I later understood, his goal of inviting me to the clinic was not to perform this exam, but to break my resistance, and to force me to agree for the second iridothomy.


11 May 2017:

Visual acuity: 20х25 left eye and 20х20 right eye.

IOP (intraocular pressure): 14 left eye; 10.7 right eye.


The assistant suddenly began to panic, told that the instrument (the device) is malfunctioning, and literarily ran out from the office.


When she returned, she told that the pressure would be measured by the doctor in his office. (A very strange incident...). Assistant"s panic could be interpreted by the fact that the non-operated right eye"s IOP was considerably lower then the left"s eye after the laser iridothomy"s procedure, and, in general, the IOP in both eyes was too low. It was very unusual, considering (as well) that the angles did not open after the iridothomy. And this was signaling that the pre-operational tests and exams were needed to see, which type of an eye surgery could be more suitable and less dangerous for me. And, thus, Dr. Gans did not do his "homework", blatantly exposing me to a danger, and destroyed my vision by his actions.


Right after this incident, I should run away from Dr. Gans and find another ophthalmologist. Probably, a lot of damaging consequences could be avoided, if I would never see Dr. Gans again.


Actually, I had to run away from Dr. Gans even earlier, when I saw him the very first time, and he said that he doesn"t want to be a cowboy, and to bump into the iridothomy like crazy, but the situation requires an urgent intervention. An expression like this ("to be a cowboy") and other suspiciously blatant non-medical terms have troubled me, and in his very tone, I heard something very alarming.


However, I explained my impression and worries by the remnants of my depression, and continued to visit Dr. Gans. This also happened because my close ones and my friends and advisers did not trust my conclusions, and interpreted them as an influence of depression. And, without their support, I could not act on my own in such a situation with solid confidence.


The same day (11 May 2017), seeing that I am firmly resisting another iridothomy, Dr. Gans described other (alternative) options. He told about another, very invasive, potentially dangerous (complicated and complex) procedure, asking me if I want to choose between an extremely simple and the most non-invasive surgery (as iridothomy) and this horrible alternative. He never mentioned any other alternatives, and did not inform me that a cataract surgery can also treat the closed angles glaucoma.


The same day (11 May 2017), Dr. Gans told me about the cataract. When I said that I did not have a cataract before the iridothomy, he produced a laughter, and insisted that I just was not aware of the cataract, and that the iridothomy just "exposed" it. But, according to all the facts, he was lying to me.


Frightened by his assistant"s reaction to the IOP results and by her natural panic, I asked Dr. Gans about the results of the IOP. However, he refused to name them to me this day, and on 11 May 2017 never revealed the IOP measuring indexes. He just did not want to say anything about the IOP that day.


Same day (Thursday, 11 May 2017) he examined my eyes by gonioscope again; this time I consciously analyzed my feelings, having come to a conclusion that now he did it very gently, delicately, and carefully.


Literally, in couple of days most of the complications were already there: a quickly progressing cataract of both eyes, a flare (like a piece of faded glass) - when I looked to the left or up, etc. But here is a strange thing: why the right eye (which was not operated yet) was also affected? (And the fact that the cataract quite often develops as a complication of laser eye surgeries [the fact of common knowledge] is the sad truth of a two-edged sword of the ophthalmologic procedures...). I also noted that luminous sources (flashlights) became surrounded with 4-5 circles of shining and spinning lines.


1. NOW A QUESTION:

a) it is well known that - after the laser eye surgeries - the intraocular pressure frequently or steadily, or within an hour threateningly jumps up; so, could another treatment tactics (oral medications and additional eye-drops) prevent a possible optical nerve damage by the laser procedure (and other complications)? and - could the excessive pressure on both eyes by the contact examination device right after the surgery (and also no medical observation and IOP measuring during 1 (one) hour after the iridothomy) cause the further eyes damage (the visual acuity of the l. eye immediately decreased to 20х25; a reflection in the upper left corner of the left eye appeared; cataract was definitely provoked by Dr. Gans; and other complications followed)?

b) if I understand correctly, the light, getting to a natural foramen - a pupil - gives a flare through the artificial hole made by laser; wild optical aberrations result. (This, it seems, is confirmed by the fact that - when I blink the eyes - i.e. when the "laser" hole is closed by the upper eyelid (and light does not arrive there): the golden shining reflection disappears)?

c) could it be a damaging factor that - during the laser surgery - the front muscle trembled and my head shacked (and the angle of the laser beam direction could change slightly)?

d) why Dr. Gans fired 3 (not 1 or 2!) laser shots, and could it play a damaging role (in particular: provoking the cataract)? (why Dr. Gans fired 7 (!) laser shots during the 2-nd (R. Eye) laser surgery, which could definitely destroy my vision?)


2. After the iridothomy of the left eye, Dr. Gans for a week left Montreal (this is what he said, but it may be not true), and could not see me, but this whole week I had pain in both eyes. Instead of visiting ER, I went (May 16, 2017) to one of clinics of the 4-th alternative network where the empathic doctors and good people work.

I knew that I"ll be sent to a French hospital or to a French doctor from this mostly francophone clinic. Indeed, I was channelized to ER of one of French hospitals, and, probably, could pass on priority queue. But I had no strength for the stressful waiting (for 6-12 hours) in the emergency room of a far-away hospital. Simultaneously, an agreement was arranged in another city that I should be seen there by an oculist, but I did not go there, too. Instead, I contacted one of semi-private clinics, the only one in Montreal where it was possible to get an appointment with an acceptably urgency.


3. May 19, 2017: I was examined in that clinic by an ophthalmologist. Pressure: 20 (l. eye) and 19 (right eye); acuity: 20х25+2 (l. eye) and 20х25 (r. eye). This doctor also pressed on my eyes by an optic instrument stronger then should be expected, so that - after her manipulations - I could no longer see at least for a half an hour or more, and tears have shed from my eyes all over my face. During the exam, I wanted to move away, but she told that she knows - this procedure is not pleasant, - however, I shall be patient. She noted that the optical nerve, probably, is already injured at a minimal level, and told that the angle of the left eye practically did not open after the iridothomy (between 1 and 2) whereas the angle of not operated right eye was between 0 and 1. In her judgment, what she sees became so not for few weeks; these pathologies (as she reads) were forming months, if not years. (But, as for the optical nerve, during last 2 years the visual acuity would fall inevitably in case of glaucoma, so the glaucoma was certainly not there before February-March 2017).


Interestingly, she tried to draw out from me (as by pincers) the name of the doctor who did the iridothomy, but I pretended that I do not remember his surname and the address of his clinic. Then she said that, in her opinion, I am a patient of Dr. Gans, and that he perfectly did the iridothomy, that he is one of 10 top oculists in Montreal, and that she is his student.


QUESTION: a) whether she could understand by the nature of iridothomy whose style it was and who is the doctor, or she foreknew who I am, who is my doctor, etc.? b) whether the eyes exam with an excessive pressure upon cornea and sclera could injure an eye?


4. May 25, 2017: I cancelled the planned iridothomy of the right eye again. I had a number of concerns. (For example: if a patient is not able to control involuntary movements, then not a YAD laser, but another one should be used). Visual acuity: 20х25 l. eye., and 20х20 r. eye. Intraocular pressure (IOP): 16 and 15. It turned out that the IOP in not operated eye is lower that in the operated. In his office, Dr. Gans has refused to do a repeated IOP test (as I requested), and only (at my request) has revealed the recorded IOP indexes (reading his assistant"s notes): 16 and 16. I asked again: "15 and 16"? He repeated again: 16 and 16. That was not what my wife saw at the tonometer, and not what the assistant said. He said that the iridothomy of the r. eye should be done immediately, urgently, and that without it I am in a great danger. This sounded very wild for me in general, and because his voice and intonations did not sound sincerely.


QUESTION: If the doctor has modified the IOP data (even by 1 (even, let"s suppose, for my own BENEFIT i.e. to convince me that the iridothomy (of the right eye) is inevitable): could he be trusted?


5. May 31, 2017. The second laser iridothomy (right eye). It threatened to end with a complete disaster. During the laser "shooting", my head made a row of involuntary movements: possibly, because of initially inconvenient body and chin position. If - during the left eye iridothomy on May 10, 2017, - my daughter was accompanying me to the laser surgery office, and (before doctor"s arrival) adjusted both the sitting and the holders (for the forehead and the chin), on May 31 Dr. Gans deliberately led me to the room of the laser procedure through another office where an assistant of another doctor (his colleague) was sitting with a patient (! how strange !) so that my wife (accompanying me) automatically was left behind on the corridor.


Feeling constrained (in an office RIGHT AWAY together with the doctor) I could not adjust the position and the height of stool and holders. After the 1-st or 2-nd shots of the laser - when the involuntary movements began, - I asked to stop the procedure, took seat in a different way, and the doctor adjusted the upper holder (at the beginning, I was generally supported only the chin alone). But the upper holder was too high, and the involuntary movements were only amplified, and Dr. Gans continued "to shoot". He even ignored my words that I am not ready! He did 7 laser shots (not 1, not 2, not 3, not 5, but 7!). Probably, only a lucky coincidence (while the doctor was "shooting" straight as a cowboy or a champion of computer games) was on my side, otherwise I could lose an eye. I do not know whether the doctor could do something (to stop the surgery? whether he understood from the beginning that I am sitting unstably?), but, probably, the presence of a witness at the office would help to stop him at the level of instincts. Instead of the 3 (as during the 1st laser surgery), this time there were 7 flashouts (due to additional idle flashouts of "adjustment fire"?!).


The drainage angle of the right eye did not open after the surgery (exactly as the left eye, and the doctor knew it in advance).


Dr. Gans did not measure the intraocular pressure (IOP) that day (even before the laser iridothomy! - and after). I asked him - why. He responded that it is not needed. Only after my persistent demands, he measured the intraocular pressure, and said it was "13", but it was told by such a strange unnatural tone that raised doubts in the truthfulness of his words. If after the previous iridothomy (l. eye) he measured the IOP pressure in 15 min. (generally, I spent an hour or a bit more in the clinic by then), this time he did the IOP test right after the surgery (only on my demand), and immediately sent me home. If the previous time (after the left eye iridothomy) he checked the operated eye next day; this time he did not examine the operated eye at all. Sending me home, he ordered to stop the IOP-controlling drops (Xalatan) for a week. Explaining, why it is necessary, he said that it is needed to check whether I can live without the eye-drops. (Which was absurdum, because the drainage angles did not open, and he knew in advance that I"ll not be able to live without the drops). He assigned a rendezvous to June 7.


In the evening (31 May 2017): a broad band of reflections in the field of the right eye"s vision to the left of a luminous source appeared. Next day: an opaque broad band of a golden glow at the left (for example, from the street lamps).


QUESTIONS: a) whether the ophthalmologist could do something to prevent a dangerous situation during right"s eye laser surgery? b) whether he could stop the surgery - when the involuntary movements began? c) whether he had the right not to measure at all the intraocular pressure in the day of the laser surgery? d) whether he had the right, having measured it immediately after the surgery (only at my demand!), to send me immediately home, even without having assigned the exam for the next day? e) whether 7 laser shots into someone"s eye is an unusual and inhuman treatment, and consists an act of medical terrorism? f) whether it was acceptable to cancel the IOP-controlling drops (Xalatan) right after the laser iridothomy - while it was obvious that the angles did not open and that the drainage does not work?


6. On May 31 and on June 1, 2017: being afraid of possible IOP jump without drops, I called Dr. Gans", requesting a confirmation (because I was shocked by doctor"s order to stop Xalatan); the secretary promised that the doctor will call back. He did not call back. However, after all, I stopped the drops, but only starting from June 4. Between June 1 and 5, 2017, the band of golden rays began to disappear, and cloudy ovals in the visual field as though began to dissolve (if it was not a subjective illusion). But after 4 days without drops, the visual acuity of the left eye degraded.


QUESTION: did canceling of the drops could trigger a real further damage?


7. June 7, 2017: by the doctor: intraocular pressure - 26 and 25 (after just 4 days without the eye-drops!). And, as in case of closed-angle glaucoma the intraocular pressure can build up very quickly and sharply, it is possible that in the previous 4-5 days without drops at some point it reached 35, or even 40 and above.


CHAPTER 4


It is interesting that a day before this visit to Dr. Gans an unknown lady called me by phone, and told that she is a cataract eye surgeon, and that my cataract surgery is scheduled for tomorrow, and that she will perform this operation. Instead of asking who she were and from what clinic she"s calling, I only replied that I know nothing about a cataract surgery, and that for tomorrow an appointment with my treating ophthalmologist is scheduled. Later I "punched" the phone number (from which this phone call was made), and it turned out that it was not a clinic, but a private residence. This bizarre event is just another evidence that something really unusual was going on around my vision problems concerning the ophthalmological care.


Despite my disagreement (and my request to postpone the retina"s exam till the next week) Dr. Gans all the same put the mydriatics into my eyes for mydriasis. (I was afraid of this exam because the IOP higher than a norm + closed-angle glaucoma are contraindicated for such a procedure).


Before this procedure, he declared that now he is going to perform the retinal exam and that he would do it on 1 May 2017 if it was possible. I commented on his words, having noted that today it is still not possible, because the mydriatic drops for the retinal exam provoke a sharp elevation of intraocular pressure, which is very dangerous. (I wanted to hint thereby that, maybe, we should be waiting a week more instead of risking...).


He reacted to my remark by throwing the words that BEFORE the laser iridothomy on both eyes it was really very dangerous and contraindicated, but now supposedly there is no danger.


I wanted to tell that RIGHT NOW the intraocular pressure is EQUALLY increased (as before the iridothomy), with the absolutely same indexes: 26 and 25! Why NOW it became not DANGEROUS?! Only because the drainage hole (the port, which connected eye"s anterior chamber to the rear) was made?


But I did not want to expose Dr. Gans" assistant, who hesitated if to "disclose" the real IOP digits, but, finally, named them to me anyway. Then I should explain from where I know that the IOP is 26 and 25.


So, I only asked to wait at least one week on Xalatan.


However, Dr. Gans ignored my demand, and came closer to me for putting the mydriatics. Being broken and weekend by the depression and this new tragedy, I did not move aside, but - as a sheep carried for sacrifice - allowed him to put 2 (!) types of drops (as I assume (it is a grounded assumption): atropine and cyclopentolat, or cyclopentolat and mydriatsit.


After the retinal exam, Dr. Gans measured the intraocular pressure again, and commented that it jumped "not too" high, and "that is a good sign". But this time he told nothing again about how high it jumped and what are the concrete indexes.


I demanded an emergency treatment for the dangerously high intraocular pressure, but, at this moment, he simple kicked me out from the room.


I do not know how I got home: I came to the clinic alone, without attendants, and now, after the drops for mydriasis, I saw almost nothing. I could be run over by car, or could fall down from the stairs in Metro, etc.


It became much worse at home, and I put Xalatan (only later I realized that I definitely do not know what drops put Dr. Gans and whether it was possible to put Xalatan in an hour after them. Besides, I also realized that the Xalatan maybe doing even worse if served few hours before the schedule, but all this was fault of Dr. Gans", who put mydriatics despite my non-consent).


Then I decided to wash the eyes with the cooled boiled water to wash out the remains of the mydriasis drops, but after this procedure, it became even worse. Not only that everything blurred; on the periphery of the sight - at the left and on the right - I saw only blocks of glow, and anything else. In the evening, I put Xalatan again.


There could not be even a discussion of going Emergency: I saw nothing, and could not go. I called to the Eye Clinic of Dr. Gans 3 times, but at first could reach the secretary, and then clinic"s phone did not respond at all (after 15:30).


Later I read that atropine, cyclopentolat, and other means for mydriasis are CATEGORICALLY CONTRAINDICATED in case of the closed-angle glaucoma and that in such cases a special device for the retinal exam is needed, which is not requiring the means for mydriasis.


On June 8, 2017 (next day), there was additional milk grease in both eyes, and the visual acuity, as I subjectively noticed, has decreased by unit.


So, Dr. Gans used 2 bottles of different drops (Cyclopentolat and Midriacyle?). He said nothing concerning the state of the retina, and just said that the IOP pressure after the mydriasis "not really jumped up high, which is a good sign". However, he did not tell, which exactly IOP (pressure) it really was, and just ordered to restart the drops, and sent me home. His refusal to name the exact digits of IOP indicates that something was alarmingly not OK, and he was just covering up.


A fuzzy vision and other optical aberrations gradually amplified within 8-10 hours, and did not pass away till next day. Still, when the central vision has cleaned up, the peripheral was still dim blue as blue translucent glass. This lasted few days. Since that moment, the optical aberrations from luminous sources in twilight amplified every evening and stayed that way forever. Since 14 June 2017, the visual effect of fires turned into multifinite stars from far-reaching rays going from the light sources. The right eye as though decreased in its size (further collapse of a vitreous without which a shape retention of eye shape becomes impossible?). Temple"s pain did not pass from June 8 to June 15...


Already starting from June 7 (2017; approximately at 15:30), I began to call the office of Dr. Gans, but it was impossible to reach his secretary. I could not go to Emergency myself (I was alone at home): I could not see. Then I called Dr. Gans" office again, and left a message with the answering machine, but nobody called back neither this, nor next week. Having no response from Dr. Gans" office, 16 June 2017 I went (again) to another ophthalmologist, who already examined my eyes on May 19, 2017.


a) whether the fact that the doctor obviously refused to name the indexes of the intraocular pressure BEFORE AND AFTER the midryatcs was a grave violation of medical ethics (I knew which IOP was BEFORE the retinal exam thanks to the fact that I entered into Dr. Gans" assistant"s office together with my wife, who was seeing the tonometer indexes)? b) whether he could "misunderstand" that I did not agree to the procedure of mydriasis, or pretended that he does not understand; or understood, but all the same put the mydriatics? c) whether he had the right to perform the retinal exam with an intraocular pressure as high as 26 and 25 in the conditions of the extreme closed-angle glaucoma? d) whether this procedure indeed further damaged my sight irreversibly (as I was subjectively feeling), and - if yes - this having only strengthened the aberrations, and having also injured the optical nerve?


8. June 16, 2017: at the clinic of the ophthalmologist who already inspected my eyes on May 19, 2017. IOP: 20 (l. eye) and 19 (r. eye). Visual acuity: 20x25 and 20x25. I brought with myself a short chronology of the vision"s deterioration development, visits to Dr. Gans, procedures and complications. During a gonioscopy (examination of the optical nerve), she so excessively pressed on my eyes with the contact lens (I suppose, Zussman's gonioscope) like, appeared, was ready to squeeze them out. I tried to move away, but this doctor, as well as during the previous exam, reacted in such a way that I had only to withdraw any resistance and to execute her commands. A suggestion that a top-class doctor (I inquired about her) does not know what she"s doing, or was not able to carry out this basic procedure properly, seemed mad.


This time a stream of tears was leaking from both eyes after the exam at least 1 hour, and - when my daughter took me home by car, pain in both eyes began to accumulate, especially in the right eye. I put anti-inflammatory and pressure-reducing drops, but it did not help. I tried glycerin, Melatonin, and other means for downing a probably jumped up intraocular pressure. Eyes were as if covered by sand, but did not redden; the right eye especially suffered.


In the same evening I saw a golden glow not with one eye any more, but with 2 eyes on both sides from the luminous sources when looked at them by the right eye.


In the morning, when looking at a window, I already saw a fuzzy silhouette of a window on a wall nearby. The left eye saw now a golden glow sideways from street lamps, too, as well as the right eye. The area of 4-5 circles made of the shining lines around flashlights increased. I began to see some lamps (especially - strong white lights) as a sheaf (ball, bulb) of sparks and rays. Every day now the area of aberrations (as though a piece of mica) grows in a temporal angle of each eye. The sheaf of rays from a flare became visible now in the afternoon.


ABSTRACT: I know that there are other methods (surgical or non-invasive) to open the drainage angles, but these methods threaten with further complications. An alternative technique: is a surgical operation, which places the implants of artificial crystalline lens instead of the natural lenses, and the closed angles open (cataract surgery). If such a surgery would be performed in the beginning, without the preliminary laser iridothomy - the iridothomy would not be needed and would not destroy my vision (the modern eye lens replacement by an artificial lens - a cataract surgery - stops the IOP pressure of iris of the eye upon cornea, i.e. pushing out outside, and the angles open).


Another proof that the cataract was a complication inflicted by Dr. Gans" laser surgery is the fact that it appeared right after the surgery and was advancing very fast in the 1-st 7-8 months after the surgery, but then stopped advancing and even (according to many objective factors) reversed, though it is improbable in terms of today's concept. My vision acuity has definitely improved; the cloudiness in the eyes became less visible, and the exams by the slot lamp revealed an improvement. Thus, the cataract was definitely not related to the aging degradation and not a result of natural processes, but a result of the eyes injury during the laser surgery performed by Dr. Mark Gans.


However, in the long run, a cataract surgery will be needed anyway, only already with all iridothomy complications and the tripled risk resulting from the damage, inflicted by Dr. Mark Gans. But it will not be done free of charge until a person becomes completely blinded by a far advanced cataract. In my case (considering additional predisposition to higher risks), a laser cataract surgery must be performed by an experienced and top professional surgeon because of the elevated risk of complications, caused by Dr. Gans" actions. (One of the factors of the elevated risk: smaller pupils.) And this option is not for someone (like me), who is covered just by the state universal social medical program.


The second problem is an artificial crystalline lens.


The free lenses implants are not multifocal, which means: an eye will not be able to focus a view from the distant objects of the close ones (I think, it is clear what it means).


The multifocal lenses, in turn, being placed in the eyes crystalline lens capsule, interact with the muscles - and change the form: for a distance view, for a close view.


However, the multifocal artificial lenses are more often generate a failure, destroying or damaging someone"s vision. The expensive high-quality unifocal artificial lenses are the most safe and preferable choice, but, in my case, this is an unavailable choice because of my socioeconomic situation.


The cheap lenses, which I would receive free of charge from the Canadian public health system (from the government), can put me at a very high risk, threatening to provoke a complete blindness or to destroy my visual function even further.


First of all, the nocturne vision with the cheap (besides, not multifocal) lenses will be disastrously destroyed, because - with free of charge cheap lenses - arises (as it is reported) - a problem with the mydriasis. (In principle, according to the patent, this should not happen, but the practice is contradicting the patent"s claim). It is especially actual for me, because my pupils became smaller after the iridothomy surgery.


Secondly, the free of charge lenses, which are not developing (unlike the paid ones, which, inserted in the eye crystalline lens capsule, open there (like an "umbrella"), must be inserted through a wider hole. It means that it is essential - for the "free lenses" - to do a sectional cut 2-3 times bigger then for the payable lenses, and this considerably increases the risk for all patients, especially for me.


The deliberately destroyed Canadian public health care has ALREADY destroyed my vision; if I had money to pay, everything could be completely different.


In the 1980-s, my mother"s eyes were operated in Moscow (at the Institute of Fyodorov, and in the Helmholtz Hospital) because of glaucoma. And no cataract (as complication) was provoked, and by no one was an issue.


Local doctors in Montreal could not believe that my mother had a glaucoma surgery and her eyes were operated: for a long time, they could not see any micro-scars, and, when they, finally, located them, they were shocked, and said that, in their judgement, only aliens could do such almost "invisible" cuts... (Non-laser cuts!).


In Russia (if it is possible to believe it), they can, in certain cases, to dissolve a phacoscotasmus. It is hard to believe (I am not a chemist, and, especially, not the biochemist, but to dissolve proteins...), but there are very credible sources. It is even harder to believe that Russian drug KanC is capable to do it; most likely, there is a complex and multistage technique, which, apparently (it is reasonable to suggest) was developed for exclusively in hospitals" therapy.


Also, the techniques of regeneration of the optical nerve are developed (electrostimulation, treatment by stem cells, treatment by "cocktail" of drugs, etc.). These are complex techniques, side effects and complications are not excluded, but they already produce the first steps of progress. Unfortunately, not for me... Only for the super-rich...


However, south of the border, in United States, the situation is even worse. In United States (where only California alone is few times richer than the whole Canada) a half of glaucoma patients are not diagnosed at all; they become completely blind because they have no health insurance, and, accordingly, no access to medical care. There, as reported, are 20 million blind people. In hundreds of other countries (where any medical help is payable), ANY ophthalmologic surgery is done ONLY for money, while in Quebec ALL medical procedures are free, except of the separate programs and procedures of dental and ophthalmological treatment (here so I "was lucky"). In other words, the eyes are also treated free of charge, only on the lowest quality and responsibility. But this wonderful system is on the verge of brake, and in 2020-2021 will be dismantled completely (in practice) by the savage, business-oriented and banks-oriented politicians.


Plus - in the shadow of all abstract benefits of the Canadian health care system - hide the ominous practices of wild racial, social, age-related, and politically (or ideologically) discrimination, and the exploitation of the medical domain for political goals. Here is where my personal ordeals originate from.


There is a little more than half a year (2017) as the results of my tests and medical exams ceased to disappear (which occurred systematically for years). Only 3 weeks as systematic disconnections of my Internet and phone stopped. Only several months as - it seems, - the persecution by police is terminated, but police and security agencies continue to monitor my movements. And, even if having received a written assurance that you are not surveilled any more, and that the sabotage against your health is stopped, you cannot get away from all past negative experience so simply in one day...


The deficit of specialists and huge queues in Canada put pressure upon all medical practice. When, sitting in the crowded waiting rooms (as at a railway station) - patients wait for an eye surgery for 3-4 hours (even the rich ones): it puts the demoralizing pressure not only upon patients, but also upon doctors. And, if because of a permanent time trouble, a doctor begins to violate safety regulations, protocols, etc.: it becomes dangerous to visit such a doctor...


The ZEISS scan 7 June 2017 of the optic disc cube (ONH / NRFL OU ANALYSIS) revealed far-advanced optic nerve damage of the L. Eye (OS) (66 percent damage), and the less-advance damage R. Eye"s (OD) optical nerve; with an especially threatening RNFL thickness in the L. Eye. Interestingly, Dr. Gans (sending this copy to Dr. Saheb) made no comments (!), and concealed the Page 2 (!). There is no his signature or his doctor"s license number, which is very disturbing in itself, and shows that he, definitely, had what to hide and to cover up.


The visual field result has revealed frightening percentage of the "dead zones" from 23 to 95, covering almost half of the 2 hemispheres in the L. Eye. Here, at least, presents a printed identification of the clinic (Montreal Eye Care Associates, 4120 St.-Catherine West, 3-rd floor, Montreal, Quebec, H3Z 1P4). The R. Eye"s visual field was affected very mildly, but was becoming more and more affected later, due to the refusal of the ophthalmological care.


I believe that 90 percent of these damages were generated by Dr. Gans, who, by unknown reasons, destroyed my vision. Partially, it is not difficult to prove, but the amplitude of the damages is harder to assess because Dr. Gans refused to do any essential glaucoma exams BEFORE 2 damaging laser surgeries for the cover up. If a ZEISS ONH / NRFL OU ANALYSIS and the OCTOPUS visual field test existed, their results could be compared to above-mentioned tests, but their absence does not allow evaluating the damage scale. However, the resume, printed out by another doctor, and the tests, done in her clinic BEFORE the R. Eye"s laser iridothomy, allow suggesting at least something. As a dilettante, I may be wrong (and a professional opinion is needed), but it seems to me that the R. Eye was more damaged by the laser iridothomy, and that the L. Eye (operated before) was also damage more after the R. Eye"s laser surgery. Besides, I have my own personal senses and descriptions after 2 vitreous detachments.


When I asked Dr. Gans (twice) if I could benefit from the cataract surgery, he said that I have some contraindications and that he advice me to avoid the cataract surgery as long as possible. Only when "you can see almost nothing", only by then it is a last option, he said, because the risk is too high.


In the end of June, 2017, I visited another ophthalmologist, who told me the same.


Dr. Gans" referral to Dr. H. Saheb reveals some important details about Dr. Gans and his opinion about my case:


Summarizing my opinion about Dr. Gans and about his guilt of destroying my vision, I must admit that my judgment is personal and may be not objective, and opinions of the ophthalmological specialists are needed to conclude with a final judgment of his role.


While doctors Dr. Chirgwin German, Dr. John Patrick Rowen, Dr. Sejean, Dr. Girair Basmadjian (if he, and not an imposter, Dr. Lewis, performed eyes exams), Dr. Pierre Brais, and (it is not fully clear) Dr. John Robert Lewis (and St.-Mary"s ER) and Dr. Jean Deschênes, and their hospitals and clinics are definitely guilty in destroying my vision, the role of Dr. Gans is not fully clear, because it is much more complicated to judge about what he did. However, he did many of unethical actions, which contradicted by his good deeds. I feel something sinister and frightening behind such an extremely contradictory conduct.


However, after Dr. Gans" "treatment", I got such severe complications (and NO BENEFITS), which destroyed my normal vision forever. Borderline post-op+Xalatan IP (20) [and sometimes near 30]; advancing glaucoma; deadly post-iridothomy aberrations; every week vision & aberrations worsening; advancing mild cataract"s major obscuring effects due to aberrations; sudden vision acuity degradation; blurry, cloudy and double vision; headache"s attacks (16-17 Jul, 2017; & 21-23 Jul, etc.); further rapid advance of cataract (19 Jul - 3 times more clouds; 23-24 Jul - R.E. central vision affected); cataract's, vision degradation"s, and visual aberrations" social implications (difficulties to read, write, watch TV, seeing at nights, communicate online; crossing streets, etc.); tears, burning and itching; especial R. Eye transient acuity loss and blurry vision; sudden, striking, and strong momentary pain in the L. Eye when the head is down or when lifting even not heavy weights; increased sensation of a foreign body in the R. Eye (which I feel always since iridothomy, in spite of the artificial tears drops); fatigue and blurry / double vision in the R. Eye after 10 min. of watching TV, writing or reading; dramatic increase of the contrast sensitivity disorder, glare disability + degradation of the night vision; poor vision for hours after waking up in the morning; eyes" irritation, itching, pain, an so on: have further turned my life into an amplified suffering. And Dr. Gans did not want to admit his role in all this, and did not express any remorse.


The last of his unethical actions took place when he completely abandoned me, a patient with an alarming (by then), dangerous, and instable stage of an advanced glaucoma, having not provided an access to another ophthalmologist.


It was absolutely impossible to become a patient of Dr. Saheb, but he finally accepted me on compassionate grounds in the beginning of July 2017.


CHAPTER 5


Dr. H. Saheb was a decent person with an ethical approach. Despite his young age, he was a top-class specialist, like Dr. Gans, or even higher, and a noble person. Dr. Saheb and his assistants (nurses, interns, and young doctors) were also very nice people, and they performed all kind of tests and exams for free.


Dr. Saheb generously offered for me a free cataract surgery, which was a chance to prevent the further advance of glaucoma and the optical nerve damage, and to correct at least some consequences of the dramatic eye injuries, inflicted by Dr. Gans.


Dr. Saheb planned to append the cataract surgery by another eye surgery, which would completely exclude the high IOP and correct the closed angles syndrome.


Unfortunately, this happened in such a time and in such circumstances, which forced me to decline his generous offer. And one of the reasons was the unwillingness of Dr. Saheb and his associates to respond to my questions, connected to an indirect recognition of the role of Dr. Gans in my new personal tragedy.


When I asked Dr. Saheb"s assistant, if the iridothomy could cause glaucoma, he responded: no (and I knew that he was not telling the truth). Dr. Saheb never told me that on 10 February 2018 I had the IOP 29 (almost 30!) and 24, and that not only his generosity, but also the persistently height IOP was behind his offer of cataract surgery and the drainage system"s repair (surgery). If I knew it, I would not declined his offer. When I asked Dr. Saheb, if the retinal exam with the IOP 25 and 26 was needed, and if it could damage patient"s eyes, he said nothing. I posed formally abstract questions, not mentioning Dr. Gans, but, all the same, they were not answering my questions, or (Dr. Saheb"s assistants) were not telling the truth.


Just 2 months ago, another ophthalmologist has destroyed my vision, and, after this tragedy, I needed more confidence in other eye doctors, which was not enforced by such insincere answers.


I also asked Dr. Saheb and his assistants next questions:


1. Prognosis for the L. Eye.

2. What"s wrong with the R. Eye? (See complains about this eye in the 2-nd paper). Prognosis.

3. Could I see anything with lenses-implants (considering severe post-iridotomy positive disphotopsia, post-vitreous detachment dense net of floaters, small pupils, and black spot in the R. Eye).

4. What risk is greater in my personal case: having the present narrow angles, or the implants surgery?

5. How narrow the angles now (slim, 1, 2?), and how dangerous the present IOP, when having such angles?

6. What other eye drops (besides Latanoprost), or another treatment can improve my situation?

7. Are there any new advances in regenerating the optical nerve? Are there any experimental researches here, and if yes, can I participate as patient?


One of the vision tests at Royal Victoria Eye Clinic (where Dr. Saheb worked) has shown (as the assistant put it) "Two (2) lines away from 20x20". It was "no lines away" before the L. Eye iridothomy, and only "1 line away" before the R. Eye iridothomy.


During one of my visits (soon after I put the eyes drops), the IOP was 15, both eyes, then, 1 and a half hours later: 19 and 20.


I also asked Dr. Saheb if the cataract eye surgery could remove the dysphotopsia, or, on the contrary, will just increase it. He said that a cornea tattoo could partially solve the problem. However, Dr. Gans, and 3 other ophthalmologists, with whom I discussed the cornea tattoo, said that they categorically do not recommend it.


I also expressed my worries about the contraindications, which could turn a cataract surgery into a failure ending with blindness, like 2 vitreous detachments, small pupils (after the iridothomy), and a number of my other personal features; and about possible complications, like a decrease of the nocturne vision, which was already destroyed after the iridothomy. Dr. Saheb said that the modern technique is so advanced and assuring now that a risk of a bad outcome or significant vision damage is "very small". If he used another expression, maybe I would be convinced by his words, and would decide to go ahead with the cataract surgery, but the same expression (the risk is "VERY small") was used by Dr. Gans before the iridothomy, and the outcome of the laser iridothomy was very sad.


Another problem for me arose from Dr. Saheb"s evasion or inability to answer (clearly) - who would perform the cataract surgery. I trusted him, and, if he were the surgeon, I would give my consent for sure. Maybe, he does not practice cataract surgeries, or there was another reason, but this also destroyed my readiness to go ahead.


Then, when I asked about the artificial lenses, I could not get a clear and assuring answer.


The free lenses implants are not multifocal, which means: an eye will not be able to focus a view from the distant objects of the close ones (I think, it is clear what it means).


The multifocal lenses, in turn, being placed in the eyes crystalline lens capsule, interact with the muscles - and change the form: for a distance view, for a close view.


However, the multifocal artificial lenses are more often generate a failure, destroying or damaging someone"s vision. The expensive high-quality unifocal artificial lenses are the most safe and preferable choice, but, in my case, this is an unavailable choice because of my socioeconomic situation.


The cheap lenses, which I would receive free of charge from the Canadian public health system (from the government), can put me at a very high risk, threatening to provoke a complete blindness or to destroy my visual function even further.


First of all, the nocturne vision with the cheap (besides, not multifocal) lenses will be disastrously destroyed, because - with free of charge cheap lenses - arises (as it is reported) - a problem with the mydriasis. (In principle, according to the patent, this should not happen, but the practice is contradicting the patent"s claim). It is especially actual for me, because my pupils became smaller after the iridothomy surgery.


Secondly, the free of charge lenses, which are not developing (unlike the paid ones, which, inserted in the eye crystalline lens capsule, open there (like an "umbrella"), must be inserted through a wider hole. It means that it is essential - for the "free lenses" - to do a sectional cut 2-3 times bigger then for the payable lenses, and this considerably increases the risk for all patients, especially for me.


I also had to evaluate my personal risks of the cataract surgery, which doubled or tripled after the laser iridothomy, negligently performed by Dr. Gans in spite of the contraindications:


1. Small (shrink after iridothomy) pupils and eyes.

2. Shallow chamber.

3. Vitreous detachment in 2013 and 2014 (which increases

the risk of macular edema, retinal tear, break, or detachment).

4. Close angles' glaucoma.

5. Uncontrolled IOP.

5. Severe positive disphotopsia due to iridotomy complications (that could further compromise the visual function after the cataract surgery).

6. Further degradation of the nocturne vision after cataract surgery.

7. Etc.


Dr. Gans has scared me telling that with my personal risks I should avoid the cataract surgery until I cannot see at all. Another ophthalmologist told me the same.


Dr. Saheb was too busy, and he could not discuss too many questions with me by definition, devoting too much time for me, which was needed for other public health care system patients.


I also asked more questions:


Was there a capsular (anterior or posterior) or corneal damage (especially in the R. Eye), fibrotic changes, or opacity? What time do I have before fibrotication of the lenses? If the glare, peripheral and night vision damage, and contrast sensitivity defect will stay, and eyeglasses will be needed for close and distant after the surgery, what are the benefits in the present situation? What role is playing (in my case) cataract in pressing hardly to iris and cornea? Only the last question was answered (mild).


How can we know if I got a trauma or radiation-related glaucoma and cataract, and what benefits it gives us? Can I have a test for heavy metals poisoning and eyes dosimetry? These questions also were not answered.


But my most important question was what undesirable outcome would bring to my vision the refusal of the cataract surgery. "If you think, Dr. Saheb, that without the cataract surgery and the additional surgery to address the close angles syndrome I"ll have multiple glaucoma attacks with abnormally high IOP, which, in the end, will destroy the optical nerve, I am ready for the cataract surgery, - I said to Dr. Saheb. "In this connection: which are the chances of the angles opening and IOP normalizing (in 5 years perspective) - less or 100 percent, and what risk is higher: of cataract surgery or the risk of glaucoma aggravation without it? What is the glaucoma prognosis in my case? - No answers given.


Dr. Saheb said that the angles must completely open by the cataract surgery; however, glaucoma poses no direct threat right now... This was not a direct and complete answer.


I repeated this question several times, trying to obtain an answer and to know if I am in a great or a greater danger without the cataract surgery, but Dr. Saheb always avoided any direct answer.


Only later (when it was too late), I figured out that if he answered this question positively, this would be a verdict about Dr. Gans" guilt, and this was the reason behind his silence.


If he responded "yes": I would sign consent, and would agree for 2 eye surgeries.


I said that I did not take a decision yet, and that I need more time to consider.


This is an extract from my dialogue with Dr. Saheb:


Gunin, Lev: But with... the positive disphotopsia, and with the artificial lenses... could the visual aberrations double?


Dr. Saheb: Silence. (After the silence) So, what would you like to do?


Lev Gunin: You mean, about the cataract surgery?


Dr. Saheb: Desire? - my suggestions.


Gunin, Lev: I would like to consider and to think before taking a decision. Or, you think, Doctor, it has to be done as soon as possible?


He said: no rash.


However, when I came next time, they went ahead with the measurements and other preparations for the laser cataract surgery. Then I had no choice but to decline it. I did not want to upset such a compassionate, generous, and decent man as Dr. Saheb, but, as anyone can see, it is possible to understand and weight my motives.


Visits to Dr. H. Saheb: 12 July 2017; 14 August 2027; 20 October 2017; 6 November 2017; 20 November 2017. 4 times he insisted on my visits (because the situation has aggravated; he just did not admit it to me. Last time, I demanded an appointment because it was (as I thought) a glaucoma attack and an emergency.


Tests and measurements at Royal Victoria Eye Clinic revealed (in comparison with the tests in the "alternative" (not Dr. Gans") eye clinic 16 and 19 May 2021) revealed general worsening and a number of specific negative changes. So, if the vision acuity in July-August 2021 was "Two (2) lines away [down] from 20x20", in May 2021 (before the R. Eye iridothomy) it was OD: 20x25; OS: 20x25+2; OU: 20x25+2. The IOP in May and in June-August was the same borderline: 19, 20; before the iridothomy (May 2021) IOP in the R. Eye: always lower then in the L. Eye (why then to rash with the iridothomy?!). The optic nerve in May 2021, before the R. Eye iridothomy, was the same in both eyes (0.74-08). Dr. Rheum"s assessment of the optic nerve has also confirms that it was almost untouched and the same in both eyes. It means that the R. Eye iridothomy somehow damaged the L. Eye"s optic nerve so badly, but did not damage the operated R. Eye. I am not a specialist, and it is a mystery for me: how it could happen, and how it could happen that the iridothomy of the L. Eye provoked the cataract in BOTH eyes.


Dr. Gans definitely sabotaged the full eye exams BEFORE iridothomy not without a motive.


More information was accumulating by then and later, more convincing it became that the iridothomy damage to my vision occurred not occasionally.


Since July, Royal Victoria Eye Clinic started to sabotage my appointments with Dr. Saheb. For example, he said that wants to see me in 2 weeks, but I could never obtain an appointment, until turning directly to Dr. Saheb for help. Till 20 November 2017, NO appointment was obtained through Royal Victoria Eye Clinic"s front desk secretaries, but ONLY thanks to Dr. Saheb"s interventions. Such a situation could not last forever. It became an intolerable psychological burden for me to call and to write to Dr. Saheb for receiving an appointment, and I did not bother him any more.


Last time I saw Dr. Saheb in 2017 it was on 20 November. The next appointment, scheduled for 20 December 2017, was cancelled by the clinic. It was dedicated for dilation, which I cancelled, but Dr. Saheb told me to come anyway. However, I received the call from the secretary, who told me that the appointment is cancelled. I suggest that Dr. Saheb had nothing to do with it.


Since then, for almost 1,5 (one and a half) year (!), I could not obtain any new appointment with Dr. Saheb. The clinic blocked appointments for a patient with an advanced and advancing glaucoma, and instable borderline IOP: an improbable outrage even for the worsening public health system in 2017.


______________


Lev Gunin


THE PUNITIVE HEALTH CARE

[HEALTH CARE AS A REPRESSIVE TOOL]


BOOK 3-3


WHO DESTROYED MY VISION AND HEARING?


BOOK 3 - PART 3.


THE CONTENT.


CHAPTER 1

CHAPTER 2

CHAPTER 3

CHAPTER 4

CHAPTER 5

CHAPTER 6


* * *

The whole text of the chronological events and medical documents (under the name of "The Punitive Health Care - (Health Care as a Repressive Tool)" is available for examination only on the basis of the following contract between the author and the reader:


I (THE READER) GIVE MY CONSENT THAT, BY CLICKING CORRESPONDING LINKS AND ACCESSING THE TEXT OF "THE PUNITIVE HEALTH CARE", I AUTOMATICALLY AGREE TO THE FOLLOWING PRELIMINARY CONDITIONS [FOR READING]:


-- I am (at least) 18 years old.


1. I (the reader) is undertaking (commit myself) not to distribute the text of "The Punitive Health Care - (Health Care as a Repressive Tool)" - entirely, or in fragments; not to copy medical documents; and not to share the text and images without author' permission.


2. I (the reader) understand that the confidential information, which is contained in this text, cannot be used for any other [than the reading (extraneous; secondary)] purposes and needs, for any researches, essays, stories, etc.


3. I (the reader) commit myself not to sneer at open ticklish personal information (which sharing was induced by circumstances), not to savor any medical, physiological, or anatomic details, and not to use this text as a reason for mockery and persecution.


4. I (the reader) am warned by the author that, except for a number of obviously immoral (by definition) doctors' and medical staff's actions, other decisions and acts described in this "confession" are not subjected to hasty moral assessment because a) only experts can judge finally about their justification and fairness; b) explanations and vindications of other party are necessary. We also do not know to what degree the doctors were under an influence and direct power of police, Ministry of Immigration, and other enforcement agencies, political organizations, groups and persons - with their own ideological, economic, and propaganda interests, - and to what degree this influence impacted on their diagnostic conclusions and assessments of patient's state of health. Many of the documentary confirmed facts incontestably demonstrate that author's ideological stand (who's opposing to younger generation's transformation into zombie-biorobots with mobile phones on shoulders instead of heads; to electronic totalitarianism with its prison-like total video surveillance; and to the tyrannical political censorship) played nearly a major role in enraging the authorities and triggering the persecutions.


5. I (the reader) am warned that the author sees the main cause of the most dramatic (for him) events in the fact that the enforcement agencies and interested persons and groups managed to present him to the medical community as an individual incapable to evaluate his health condition objectively; as a health-consciousan (or hypochondriac); an extremist; a troublemaker; an individual obsessed with panic and alarm patterns; as a person, who is making unreal demands to the system of medical care - concerning his - allegedly - pseudo-maladies and exaggerated gravity of trivial indispositions. This smear campaign of defamation, scurrilous libel, and wicked calumny made impossible receiving an adequate medical care (and sometimes any medical help at all), and led to health undermining, numerous diseases, incidents, and unnecessary sufferings. Doctors also considered difficult to believe in continuous (not connected with each other) illnesses, with an interval of 4-7 days, sometimes rolling at the same time: as tsunami. They refused to believe in these sequences of illnesses' painful course, danger, and significance. This chronicle disproves such a prejudiced opinion, producing an incontestable evidence.


6. I (the reader) am informed that all negative remarks, characteristics, and facts' assessments belong only to the portrayal of criminal groups, extremists, and carriers of anti-humanistic, racist, and totalitarian ideology, but do not contain groundless generalizations and negative assessment of any country, ethnic group, or religion. The author is categorically against dismantling of any of the existing states, and against restrictions of the rights of religious congregations of any faith.


7. I (the reader) am informed that this edition partially presents the previous 2017 edition without any changes, and, thus, may not correspond to later view and opinions.


8. I (the English reader) am informed that some parts of the following English text of "The Punitive Health Care" - were translated from Polish, Russian, or French originals, and may contain primitive language, double interpretation, or puzzled meaning. Such confusing fragments should be compared with their originals in Polish and Russian languages (author's native languages) [2016-2017]; all controversial points must be resolved through such a comparison.


9. In the very last moment of this edition's make-up (April 2023), the author came across a description of so-called Havana-syndrome, and found same symptoms and complications, which he experienced when was attacked by an unknown remote weapon (3 Nov. 2005, 7 Jan. 2013, and 21 June 2016), and developed symptoms of post-microwave irradiation.


_________


CHAPTER 1


In September 2017, my alternative methods of eyes treatment began to bear fruits.


10 September 2017 - 23 Sep. 2017 - massive and fundamental cataract improvement: hallos and auras almost disappeared, vision sharpness restored (20x20 - home check), clearness restored - traces of improvement lasted till 25 Sep 2017.


However, 23 Sept. 2017, I felt something like a chemical burn in both eyes (unconsciously rubbed my eyes at night while sleeping?). At wakeup time - burning and irritating sensation. Since 25 Sept. 2017 - a new worsening started. I suspected that something happened to both eyes at night (23 Sept.), which again boosted cataract's new advancement.


2-3 Oct. 2017 - continued worsening of vision.


14-16 October 2017: good vision improvement again.


16-17 Oct 2017: forgot to renew eye-drops; did not have drops for night from 16 to 17 October. 17 Oct 2017, at 8.40 I came to pharmacy to renew the eye-drops. Police 15-13 - on my way back home.


Over night - vision worsening; "sand" in both eyes sensation, etc.


18 Oct 2017 - in the evening, attempts to restore my wife's erased photos from her cell phone made my eyes tired. My vision has drastically declined.


19 Oct 2017 - The vision did not restore. Everything is blurry, as in a fog, and the optical aberrations doubled.


20 Nov 2017 - 8.30 - my last visit to Dr. Saheb. Since then, for almost 1,5 (one and a half) year (!), I could not obtain any new appointment with Dr. Saheb. Royal Victoria Hospital at Glen Hospital"s eye clinic blocked appointments for a patient with an advanced and advancing glaucoma, and instable borderline IOP: an improbable outrage even for the worsening public health system in 2017. The next appointment with Dr. Saheb was given only in March 2019, when I was already visiting Dr. Mark Lesk. It was issued by the clinic soon after my first visit to Dr. Lesk, and so, can be interpreted as a cover up. I did not cancel this appointment as had to see Dr. Saheb because Dr. Lesk said (during my first appointment with him) that, if I was a patient of Dr. Saheb, I should better return to him.


Here (below) is this appointment slip, 1-st since 20 November 2017:


Confidential information removed for security reasons.


When I told Dr. Saheb that I am not sure how long I could stay a patient of Dr. Lesk, Dr. Saheb wrote a letter to Dr. Lesk, reminding the latter of his full responsibility of taking care of this patient. Here is his letter (below):


Now, let"s go back to the events in 2018.


12 Feb. 2018 - at Emergency Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital with glaucoma attack. I came with an acute pain in both eye (especially, in the L. Eye), temples" headache, blurry vision, and other symptoms. When the nurse measured the intraocular pressure, it was 28 (L. Eye), and 25 (R. Eye).


However, any records about my visit to the Emergency at Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital disappeared from this hospital"s Medical Archive. When I came 2 months later trying to obtain the records about 12 February 2018, there were no records.


Here (below) is the evidence of my visit to Emergency 12 February 2018:


Confidential information removed for security reasons.


This is the metro-bus pass for going to Emergency at Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital. 12 February 2018.


While in Emergency, I made a photo of the chart (see below):


There is a clear date "10 - 02 - 2018", instead of 12-02-2018, but even this page has disappeared from the Medical Archive (or I just did not receive it). No such page found.


Timing on this (see above) page corresponds to the Metro-bus ticket on 10 February 2018.


No triage nurse writing; no emergency assessment of an ophthalmologist at Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital"s eye clinic: nothing left in the Medical Archive from 10, 12, or 13 Feb. 2018. (I was examined in the Emergency on 12 Feb. 2018, and in the hospital"s Eye Clinic on 13 Feb. 2018). Only my photos of some pages survived, but they are not clear, or not the whole page captured, unfortunately.


One note says: s/p IL OU (May 2017) Dr. Gans --- ne peut pas... (unfortunately, it is cut by the photo at the most important instance).


12 February 2018, at the Emergency and at the Eye Clinic (Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital) I received an appointment for 19 February 2018 with Dr. Tassot. In the nurse"s office (pneumatic tonometer) OS - 28 (L. Eye), and OD - 25 (R. Eye); in ophthalmologist"s on duty office: OS - 20 (L. Eye), and OD - 22 (R. Eye).


19 Feb. 2018, Monday. Only 1 page of Dr. Tassot"s assistant"s notes was found in the medical archive. Visual acuity: OS (Left Eye) - 20/25 - 1; OD (Right Eye) - 20/25 - 2. (Degradation). IOP: OS (L.e.) - 17; OD (R.e.) - 20. (Instable, border-line intraocular pressure). The 2-nd page of the same document just disappeared, as well as the notes of Dr. Tassot (in my presence, he entered his notes in the computer, and also filled 2 or 4 pages of an appropriate form). No mention about OS - 28 (L. Eye), and OD - 25 (R. Eye) in the Emergency, when the nurse measured it by pneumatic tonometer. In Dr. Tassot's office: OS - 21, OD - 18. (Abnormally high pressure in the L. eye).


2 March, 2018 - dizziness at night, from 1-st March to 2-nd; then, next days - increasing.


3 - 11 March - momentary dizziness (few second), much stronger: when laying down on the left side. A 6 sec. delay between laying down on the left side - and the beginning of light vertigo. (Probably, L. Eye related).


16-18: hard headache + eyes pain (new glaucoma attack?)


27 March 2018 - strong headache.


28 March 2018 - strong headache, at 9.00 - blood pressure 145 x 81, pulse 91.


19 April 2018, Thursday, 1-st visit to Dr. Mark Lesk (7.50). His status in the hospital: Ophtalmologue, specialiste de Glaucome (Hopital Maisonneuve-Rosemont).


A question who and why decided that I should be a patient of Dr. Lesk, and not of Dr. Tassot, remains open.

When I asked someone who supposed to know Dr. Mark Lesk, he said that Dr. Lesk, a citizen of Israel, studied at Weizmann Institute of Science (Israel) in the 1980-s; that he was connected to the Jewish General Hospital in Montreal, or had connections there, which helped him to advance his career; and that he is an Associate Professor of the McGill University (not like the most of the Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont eye specialists, normally associated with French universities, like the Université de Montréal), which is an English university and a center of many controversies and ethical problems.

Further investigating, who is Dr. Lesk, I found out that he was an important researcher, interested in: Influence of blood flow and ocular biomechanics on the optic nerve in glaucoma; Development of a new imaging device to measure the biomechanical properties of the optic nerve (patent); Stem cell regeneration in glaucoma; Blood flow deficiency in AMD; Research Axis Vision Health, Research Unit Pathophysiological Mechanisms, and in The optical nerve treatment by stem cells; and other experimental efforts. The field of his researches could be "a zone of interests" of secret services.

He is also an inventor and a patent holder: Lesk, M. R., Wajszilber, M., et Ozaki, T. Apparatus and Method for Measuring a Biomechanical Property of an in vivo Eye, and Method of Diagnosis. World Wide Patent application, May, 2008.

After coming from Israel, Dr. Lesk studied Ophthalmology at McGill University (M.D.), Montreal (1989), then at the University of Montreal (1994), and then he studied and worked in United Stated (fellowship in glaucoma, Wills Eye Hospital, Philadelphia (1995).

He was an author or co-author of a number of academic scientific medical publications, and his co-authors were - in many occasions - people of the Jewish origin.

When later (in 2020) I started reading some of Dr. Lesk"s works, I discovered that what he claimed in his books contradicted to his managing of my case. If I understood his academic statements correctly, he is practicing double standards: patients of the public health care (like me) are completely disconnected from his advanced methods, methodic, principles, and standards.


However, before starting the description of events, which involve Dr. Lesk's participation, I must underline that, in my opinion, Dr. Lesk is a good man and an ethical doctor, who is just a hostage of the present barbarism, and some of his surficial "unethical" actions, in reality, were triggered by the government's policies, which he just has no possibility to ignore. I deeply believe that Dr. Lesk is an only ethical ophthalmologist (together with Dr. Saheb, Dr. Tassot, and Dr. Allotaibi), among 15 other eye doctors, whom I met. I also met 2 or 3 young interns, who behaved adequately ethically, but I don't remember their names (they might be mentioned in this chronicle somewhere).


I am advocating for Dr. Lesk, first of all, because, for 5 years, I know him as a compassionate, responsible, and human person, with a firm ethical code in his approach. I am also advocating for Dr. Lesk, because, unfortunately, I MUST describe some of his actions, which are regrettable from the ethical point of view, but which were caused by the exceptional circumstances and the pressure from outside, and should be excused as, for example, the actions in the force-majeure situations. I would like NOT TO mention these facts, but this is my duty, and I am obliged not to conceal anything to fulfill my mission. And, finally, I am advocating for Dr. Lesk, because I suspect that he is deeply suffering from an uncomfortable and painful psychological misbalance, caused by his role within the degrading public health system and his unfeasibility to help the most vulnerable patients. I must add that Dr. Lesk is one of the best professionals in Montreal in his field, and this alone puts him into a special position, which he has no authority to reject. (The reader should understand my point).


So, on 19 April 2018 (Thursday) I came to (1-st time) to Dr. Mark Lesk (at 7.50), who worked at the Eye Clinic (Ophtalmologie, Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont).


In the very beginning, or in the very end of his exam (or, when he briefly showed up in his assistant"s office? - I don"t remember exactly) Dr. Lesk said that if I was a patient of Dr. Saheb, I"ll better return to the latter.

This alone puts the relationship doctor-patient in a very special situation, because Dr. Lesk did not want me as his patient from the very beginning, and I, in turn, had no other choice as well.

The Royal Victoria Eye Clinic at site Glen has systematically sabotaged my appointment with Dr. Saheb, and I did not want to overuse Dr. Saheb's personal intervention. When Dr. Saheb used to tell that he wants to see me in 3 months, indicating it in my chart, the secretaries have aggressively ignored it, and, besides, openly demonstrated that they dislike me for some reasons.

Finally, the Eye Clinic at site Glen sabotaged my appointments for 1 year and 6 months (almost), disregarding the alarming and dangerous situation with my eyes, and I had no other options, but to turn to another hospital.

Running forward, I must also stress that the unethical visits of 2 of Dr. Lesk's colleagues during the medical exams (performed by Dr. Lesk) could be qualified as provocations, which goals were to check Dr. Lesk's attitude towards me, the condition of my vision, and to provoke Dr. Lesk's enmity to his patient. Bad guys have developed a perfect psychological technic, which enables to cause a negative attitude in someone towards another person even without saying a word.

Depending on doctor's personality and psychological stability, some hints about patient's "anxiety" or an "unethical behavior" (even if they are completely unjustified) may cause doctor's "similar" (unethical) response, and not always the doctor is responsible for his ethical mistakes, because the modern destructive malicious technologies are capable to do almost everything. But - I stress in particular - the most important thing that Dr. Lesk, despite all provocations, did not cause any significant harm to my health, and, to the opposite, prevented a major worsening and helped me a lot. This is the most important fact. However, I cannot be sure that the hospital or Dr. Lesk personally (because I don't know - who and why sabotaged the appointments in the most alarming situations) did not caused some irreversible damage to my eyes when my access to the ophthalmological care was blocked for months during the most dangerous glaucoma attacks.


Comparing to the test at the office of Dr. Saheb in November, 2017, my vision acuity has degraded for 1 line of the table.

In Dr. Lesk"s assistant"s office IOP: R. Eye = 19,9 (20); L. Eye = 22.

In Dr. Lesk"s office: R. Eye = 18; L. Eye = 22.

Then: 19, 23.

Dr. Lesk said that, concerning the visual field, "the right eye is normal, this is the normal blind spot; the left eye is almost normal, there is an area where the view is lost".

Concerning the damage to the optical nerve, Dr. Lesk said that if the R. Eye is almost normal, the damage on the left is "what you can see is quite abnormal".

Comparing the visual field test at Dr. Gans' clinic and the visual test today (19 Apr. 2018), Dr. Lesk said "may be it's worse".

Dr. Lesk said that I have a "mixes" type of glaucoma: close and open angles glaucoma.

He said that the angles are not open, but "almost completely open now".

I guess it means, probably, that - while the angles did not open after the iridothomy, - they were gradually opening since the iridothomy, until became "almost completely open", which, in turn, probably, means that the iridothomy, which destroyed my vision, was not needed (the angles would open anyway with a more aggressive IOP control), and that the decision to do it was premature.

Dr. Lesk said that the R. Eyes angles were now completely open, and the L. Eye"s angles were not wide-wide open, but open enough for not worrying about it.

However, said Dr. Lesk, "You have the drainage system that was damaged while the angles were closed, and now it does not function very well, especially in the L. Eye".

He said that - because I have the IOP in the L. Eye (that already sustained a considerable damage) too high, I need an additional eye-drop.

Dr. Lesk said: "At some point, you have your cataract removed, and I hope that this surgery will treat your glaucoma and will put your L. Eye's internal pressure under a better control, but what you lost in the visual field will not come back". However, he did not offer any cataract surgery.

And he prescribed another eye-drop - in addition.


I could make a conclusion that, if, when I paid my 1-st visit to Dr. Saheb, the angles were still closed (just a bit more open than when I was a patient of Dr. Gans), now the angles have opened almost completely without any additional surgery.


31 May 2018 - At 13.43, I went out with my photo-camera, forgot the sun eyeglasses, but did not return home, and did photos via vizir (looking with the left eye) in the sun. + - when I photographed the opposite Chapiteau place (near rue Seigniors) - across the canal - a man in a white shirt (like a worker of the site) was wearing a strange optical or scanning device with several tubes and "eyes". (It was hanging on a rope from his neck). The device had a screen on the small edge (the man was looking down to see the screen). Even before coming home I already had a headache, and pain in the left eye, which became red. I had a small dizziness, and nausea for 2 or 3 hours. Everything points to a new glaucoma attack with an elevated intraocular pressure.


18-19 July 2018 - a new possible glaucoma attack (left eye), with nausea, headache (left side of the head), and eye pain with sensing a kind of a pressure (probably, elevated (above the norm) intraocular pressure again).


16 August 2018 - Dr. Lesk; 9.00 - 12.25.


1) IOP - l. eye (OS) - 14; r. eye (OD) - 16 ; 2-nd time - 14 and 14.

2) Vision acuity: OD (R. Eye) 20x20-1; OS (L. Eye) 20x25-1.

3) L. Eye: red, nausea, moderate dizziness (medical notes entered by Dr. Lesk).

4) Blepharitis, Rosacea (new conditions, indicating a considerable worsening and further complications of the eyes" illness without 2 additional essential eye surgeries). (Dr. Lesk noticed these new worsening conditions-diagnoses in his medical writings).

5) Dr. Lesk entered in the line "another diagnosis" something that I can not read.

6) In the line "Evolution" he has chosen the sub-line "the same", but entered something with a question mark.

2) He told me that he sees no cataract's advance.

3) No worsening of the optic nerve.

4) However, he refused to do any comment on the visual field test, why?

5) He reported the scratches of unknown nature in both eyes. When I asked about their origin, he said: "strange".

6) Dr. Lesk prescribed erythromycin + compresses, besides the IOP-controlling eye-drops and artificial tears (which I had to buy).

7) Dr. Lesk said that he wants to see me in 4 months.


During my conversation with Dr. Lesk on 16 August 2018, a man in a black suit, who looked like a doctor (and like a member of the Jewish community), showed up in the examination office, and began to speak to Dr. Lesk as if I was absent from the room. They spoke lowering their voices, and the "man in black" (with a briefcase, low growth) pointer at me by his eyes and brows. He came to Dr. Lesk during my visits 4 or 5 more times, taking time from my appointments and hindering an examination of a patient, not mentioning that any private visit by a stranger during a patient's visit to a doctor is a striking violations of the medical ethics.


When I had an appointment with Dr. Tassot, the same man was standing beside the open door and probably listened.


CHAPTER 2


20 Aug. 2018, I sent an email to Dr. Lesk, because the erythromycin was not working for me, and because I was not given proper instructions about the order of medications, the erythromycin, and the compresses.


I wrote to Dr. Lesk:


I have 3 short questions concerning the latest developments:


1. How many times per day should I apply

erythromycin? Can it be replaced by drops?

The procedure of the ointment application is

just not working for me.

2. How can I participate in the clinical studies

of Insulin Eye Drops, developed by Jessica

Agostinone and Dr. Adriana Di Polo, and

Lanosterol?

3. What is the order of drops and

applications (what first?) ? [the name of e-d],

[the name of e-d], Erythromycin, compresses?

How long should I apply Erythromycin?

Is a sensation of having send in the eyes,

when waking up has something to do with

the blepharitis, or it could be a side effect?


Dr. Lesk has never answered my questions.


Having no answers, I addressed my questions to Dr. Lesk through eye-clinics' secretaries, and demanded to replace the ointment by an antibiotic eye-drops, but the doctor did not call, and did not write to me even after that. Then I called the Maisonneuve-Rosemont Eye-Clinic's secretaries, asking to see a nurse or Dr. Lesk's assistant for instructions and assistance, and, in spite of the promise to contact me "later", they never called back. Then I asked the pharmacy to direct a request to Dr. Lesk to replace the ointment by antibiotic eye-drops, but the latter has never responded.


Only 1 page (related to 16 August 2018) alone found in the Medical Archive. No digital imaging scans, no visual field test, nothing else...


8 Oct. 2018, Monday - after carrying out a garbage bag - light headache (left side) + left eye pain at night = passed (no pain any more). However, on 10 October 2018, there happened a major glaucoma attack, which forced me to turn to Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont Emergency.


In 2019, and in 2021, I could retrieve only 1 single page dated 11 Oct. 2018 from this hospital"s archive.


Concerning this given page, all entered information is credible and true, while - in the English hospitals (more influenced by 2 foreign countries), from 20 to 50 percent of medical information was always deceptive, misleading, or not true. Even my refusal of Tylenol is truthful (I did not want to be insensitive to pain because wanted to be aware of the vision-threatening symptoms). The mentioning of Tylenol is also strikingly emphasizing that - in the French hospitals - I was offered the pain killers, which - in the English hospitals - were never suggested, or even denied, even when I was waiting in the Emergencies waiting rooms with fractures, serious vascular injuries, extremely painful abscesses, and other horrible emergences up to 24 hours, and was not offered any pain-killers, and even when I demanded Tylenol: I was denied it. This document confirms the true nature of my complaints, as the vital signs data shows that they were not ungrounded (for example, the blood pressure was too high for me).

Here it is (see below; some confidential information removed for security reasons):


11 Oct. 2018 - Emergency Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hosp.


After my visit to Emergency, I called Maisonneuve-Rosemont"s Eye Clinic several times, asking for an appointment with Dr. Lesk, but was denied. I also sent a message to Dr. Lesk:


Dear Dr. Lesk!

On the 10-th of October, around midnight, I felt pain in my left eye and the left side of my head. At night, the pain became stronger. The Metro was already closed; I could go to ER only in the morning. However, after a sleepless night, I stayed in bed till 12.00 (October, 11). Then an annoying diarrhea kept me home till the evening time, when I, finally, went to Maisonneuve-Rosemont hospital by Metro. I took the number 201; there were 6 people ahead of me for triage.

When I arrived, the pain almost gone, but sitting at the stone-hard chair in Emergency's waiting-room and experiencing the stress of unlimited and indefinite limbo of waiting - brought the pain back.

During next 4 hours, only 4 or 5 patients were called into the "cabinets". I took another number - 234 - to see the triage nurse again. I told her that my condition has been worsening, and I have now a strong pain in the left eye. I assumed that if the intraocular pressure is 30 or above, I can go blind. She explained that the emergency department has now around 300 patients, and only 2 doctors on duty, and there are a number of ambulances. So, she said, I'll certainly wait many hours before my intraocular pressure could be measured. I trusted her. Both triage workers, and 2 inscription secretaries, and even the security guard were nice, polite people. The second secretary even went to ZER room to ask about me, but came with empty hands...

Suffering from arthritis and perinea ulcerous dermatitis (both make my sitting more then 1-2 hours a real torture), and other health problems; missing eye drops' schedule twice (for 1 and 2 eye-drops); and fearing that the torturous inconveniency could provoke just another vicious glaucoma attack, I left the hospital.

Today, 12 October 2018, the pain is still there, and I have no choice but to ask you for an emergency appointment, or for a visit to an assistant, who could measure the intraocular pressure to see if I am OK.

I want also to stress that in English hospitals I faced a number of such tremendous events in ERs (concerning not only the fate of all patients in general, but mistreatment and bulling against me personally) that now I feel fear before each visit, so don't ask me anymore, why I did not go there when needed. I am also aware about a malicious practice of some medical circles to libel a "difficult patient" as hypochondriac.

You must agree that without an urgent measuring of intraocular pressure, when eye-head pain strikes - we may not be sure if IOP don't continue to destroy my vision. The only solution - regarding my social situation and the system's failure to treat properly people like me - is to enable me an urgent access to eye tonometer service without an appointment, and I will never come without a good reason.

Thank you for understanding.

Yours truly,

Lev Gunin.


P.S. It is very possible that you are doing enough favors to me by frequent appointments and human approach, but, considering, which circumstances led to the vitreous body detachment, glaucoma and cataract, and to other dramas that I am facing in health, professional, social, and other domains, maybe I really deserve justice and compassion (such as I have to people who suffer more then me). 12-10-2018


However, Dr. Lesk never replied and never contacted me.


While Dr. Saheb intervened every time, when the clinic sabotaged the appointments, and managed to arrange my visits, Dr. Lesk did nothing, and even justified infinite delays while my condition was worsening.


In the end of November, 2018, I came to the clinic with my wife; she made a dramatic appeal demanding an appointment for me and saying that abandoning a patient in my situation is unjust and unlawful, and, finally, I received an appointment for 28 November 2018.


Unexpectedly, a strange email reply to my faxes and emails came on 27 November 2018 from Dr. Lesk, who claimed that, in response to my appeals (since 11 October 2018), he made possible my visit next week (next Wednesday) at 14:00. However, "next Wednesday" was the 2-nd of December (not 28 Nov. 2018), and 14:00 is not 13:40. I am trying to avoid any abstract insinuations, but it is very likely that Dr. Lesk, who already knew that the secretariat has booked an appointment for me with him on 28 November 2018, attempted to justify and clear up himself, pretending that it was not him blocking my appointments, and also to justify his actions like completely ignoring patient's appeals and complains.


It could be something even more sinister, considering a strange encoding or decoding of my emails texts, when I received replies from Dr. Lesk. In spite of my writing in English, in Unicode encoding, some characters of my texts are twisted and appeared wrongly in Dr. Lesk's replies. Sometimes, my name (identification) and the date (under my text) used to disappear from the texts of Dr. Lesk's replies, which happened only with his emails. Was it his or someone else's attempt to alter my original emails in terms to present me as an inadequate person? Was it an attempt to confuse the dates?


If Dr. Lesk knew that I booked an appointment already (it is impossible to suggest that in the morning, 27 November, he had no knowledge about it), then his email can be considered as an attempt to produce a disinformation and to confuse me. Still, because my goal is not to collect any compromising evidence against Dr. Lesk, but to find the truth, I assume that, theoretically, his email, which appeared in my email box in the morning, 27 November 2018, could be sent days earlier, because my emails are sometimes sabotaged. However, another email, which came from Dr. Lesk the same day, 27 November 2018, in which he again pretends that knows nothing about the appointment on 28 November 2018 (at 13:40), makes his innocence even more improbable, and his fraud more likely. It is something very fishy about his claim that he did not receive any of my faxes, and that he "missed" my emails (all 4 of them!), especially when he is actually replying to one of my emails (which, he pretends, he was "missing").


Here (see below) the screenshots of both of his email replies:


So, in his 2-nd email (evening, 27 Nov. 2018) Dr. Lesk pretends again that knows nothing about the tomorrow"s appointment, which is absolutely improbable. It is also improbably that he did not receive my faxes and my emails.


Here (below) is the evidence that my faxes were successfully sent to the destination, and have reached Dr. Lesk's clinic's fax number:


Suggesting about what may happen, I assume that, comparing the previous data with the data of the exam during my 2-nd appointment with him on 20 Aug. 2018 (including the digital data, like CV, Visual Field, and OCT), Dr. Lesk came to a conclusion that I am not safe, and that an additional surgery for repairing the drainage system is ultimately needed (for the best results: combined with the cataract surgery).


It was definitely not occasionally that, starting from this particular appointment, I was never given my chart in hand any more. While all other patients were carrying their chart themselves, my file-dossier was always then taken to the offices by a nurse.


I suggest that he definitely came to a conclusion that - while my left eye is still not safe with the additional eye-drops, - my right eye is even more vulnerable for glaucoma advance without additional eye-drops (which he previously administrated only for my left eye). In this situation, he was obliged to schedule at least one additional surgery (to repair the drainage system), but he did not do that. May be, he was about to announce this additional surgery, but the visit of his "mysterious" "colleague in black" stopped him? (I had an impression that all the visits of this man in black at the particular time [during my visits to Dr. Lesk] were about me). His duty was, at least, to administrate additional eye-drops into my right eye as well, but this could signify (in the documentation) and emphasize the worsening during the period of his treatment and the need of an addition surgery. So, Dr. Lesk preferred to do nothing, putting me at a greater elevated risk. Another question is: why an ethical (in general) doctor like him acted like this?


What happened next is Dr. Lesk's unwillingness to continue the treatment and his declaration that I should "better" find for myself "another ophthalmologist". And then he has fallen into a crack of an irreversible moral decay, employing some quite fraudulent methods to justify his actions.


However, I believe that Dr. Lesk was initially (and remain in general) a conscientious and ethical person, and that a constant fight was going on within his conscience. I believe that (in most cases) I can judge about people and able to distinguish the ethical persons (even the degree of ethics in them). I deeply believe that a person like Dr. Lesk could do some rare unethical things exclusively under a threat to his close ones or to himself, or under a very sinister order, which he could not disobey. And, if it was an order, it may come from those, who want to keep me on the hook (as in case of other events of medical sabotage). Moreover, the bad gays not necessarily give their orders in an open form, but they know and use a countless number of tricks for forcing the ethical persons like Dr. Lesk to do things, which they would never did otherwise.


When I came to Dr. Lesk on 28 Nov. 2018 (13.40), the same man in a black suit with a big black case (portfolio) in his late 40-s (who's probably another ophthalmologist) has shown up again (and later appeared almost every time I used to come to Maisonneuve-Rosemont eye clinic), watching me closely and following me (when he - probably - can). When I had an appointment with Dr. Tassot, he was standing beside the open door and (probably) listening. When I came to Dr. Lesk on 18 Apr. and on 17 Aug. 2018 - he was there, standing beside the open door, and then entering and speaking to Dr. Lesk.


This time he was standing beside the wall, near the open door, to the very end of my appointment with Dr. Lesk, and entered the room right after my words that my eye problems may relate to microwave radiation. When he entered the room, he gestured and nodded to my side, and mimicking as if he was pointing at me.


Dr. Lesk was not in a mood to explain the results of today's exam, and only told me that the IOP was "very good": 12 x 14. Same indicators appeared in my chart. I am not a graphologist, but the written digits appear in such shapes as if doctor's assistant was hesitating while entering them into the form. The "2" in the 1-st group of digits is completely different from all other digits of the personal handwriting in this page, and the second group of digits was entered below the line, and, besides, the "4" was written as if the doctor wanted to correct it. The visual acuity was OD: 20 / 25-2; OS: 20 / 30 (ts) 20 / 20-2 (a significant decrease of vision's efficiency).


Entered symptoms and diagnoses were: conjunctivitis; blepharitis; rosacea; cataract; more blurry vision and halos since 10 October 2018; lights are blinding; reflections destroy the vision; eyes are itching and burning; pupils: Marge Telenject.. (unreadable). Doctor Lesk prescribed the antibiotic (Doxycline). (see below)


[Personal information has been removed] The date of the appointment is indicated as 2018-11-28.


I may be mistaken, but the cataract was mentioned the very first time in the Maisonneuve-Rosemont hospital's Eye Clinic, and not by Dr. Lesk.


Dr. Lesk told me that he wants to see me in 3 months.


Suspiciously, only 1 page could be located in the medical archive concerning the 2018-11-28 appointment: no Dr. Lesk"s writings, no CV, OCT, biometry, visual field... even mentioned.


However, I managed to obtain a true data of the 28-11-2018 tests (which later disappeared from my chart), which mentioned also the lens thickness; retina thickness; considerable astigmatism; and so on. It revealed the double standards: one information layer available for patient and to SOME other doctors, and another information's layer available strictly for this particular clinic (and, as we can suggest: to enforcement agencies), which represents a concealment of some data from patient and from other medics.


The selective data left after Dr. Lesk's exam on 28-11-2018 can be compared with the full data that was freely provided by Dr. Saheb:


20 Nov 2018: OS - 20x30 -2, OD - 20x25 -2; CCT - 557; 567 urn; repeated CCT: 551; 559; Lens Thickness: 4,81; 5.15 mm; Retina Thickness: 200* x 200* um; Aqueuos Depth: 1,94; 1,81; White to White: 11,93; 11,85; Iris Baricenter: - 0,47 / 0,35 mm; 0, 45 / 0,05 mm; Astigmatism: 0,66 D @ 156; 0,09 D @ 73; PupH: 1) Diameter: 3,26; 2,88; Baricenter: - 0,35 / 0,05; 0,34 / - 0,02; Axia! Length: 23,31; 23,26. (Dr. Saheb).


This is not just the general availability of the data, but also the difference in its delivery. While Dr. Lesk's data was presented by handwriting, Dr. Saheb's data was printed out, which made it more accessible for the patient.


Due to all symptoms and diagnoses (28-11-2018), there was an undeniable proof that my ophthalmological situation has been changed to worse (which, in turn, shows that my complains and demands of an appointment - were justified), and that Dr. Lesk had to do something about it. The data on that single page suggests that the sabotage of the appointments has caused some damage (temporarily or irreversible), as the blepharitis and other irreversible pathologies, perhaps, could be prevented if I got an appointment in time. Doxy-tabs gave no relief and no result, and I was just poisoning myself for nothing.


CHAPTER 3


On 29 Nov. 2018 (the 3-rd day of waiting for a diamond delivery), this very small diamond (for a member of my family; ordered and paid by him), finally, arrived, and its now-owner has flashed the diamond, for half an hour, close to my eyes. When he left, pain started to evolve in the left side of my head, and in the left eye. I heard a hiss in my ears, which disappeared for a long period of time, and the blood pressure have jumped to 140 x 95. In 2 hours, pain started to become less sensible, and then seemed to ease, and I went to sleep without visiting an emergency department. Next day, the pain returned, but I had no opportunity to go to emergency, and called 10 optometrists offices, without getting an appointment within a reasonable frame of time. After 15:00, pain began to disappear.


This event has shown again that my eyes' situation is very unstable, and that I am exposed to a permanent danger to my vision.


In the end of January and first days of February 2019, I had what I consider another glaucoma attack: pain in both eyes; eyes itching and burning; blurry and double vision; temples' pain (especially on the left side); etc.


I called the Maisonneuve-Rosemont hospital's Eye Clinic, demanding an appointment with Dr. Lesk as soon as possible, and added that, if I'll be denied an appointment, I'll have to go to emergency.


6 Feb. 2019, I came to the clinic at 9:00 (the appointment was booked for 9.20). This time I spent in the clinic around 8 or 9 hours: an unacceptable (for an eye clinic) waiting and procedural time for a routine examination. It was, perhaps, connected to someone's intention to "punish" me for my persistent demand of rendezvous.


When Dr. Lesk's associate put drops in my eyes before some tests, I could not see anything; everything became blurry; and I could not see normally for 2 following hours. She said, answering my question that the lights gave such an effect, but the vision was obscures BEFORE she put me on checks with lights. This incident may fit in the same category as the unusual amount of time I was forced to spend at the eye clinic.


I also noticed that the intraocular pressure jumped from 12x15 at the technician's assistant office to 16x18 when I was assessed by doctor's associate.


A significant worsening was reflected in the 6 Feb. 2019 assessment report.


The vision acuity: OD (Right): 20x30+2, TS - 20x25+2; OS (Left): 20x20-1. Glaucoma CFA.

IOP: 15 and 13; 15 and 16 (that does not correspond the indications at doctor"s associate"s office).

Symptoms (in French): suin ou; Blépharite 2ave; rosacée ou; Cataractes Sx ou;

Tests: 1. visual field, OCT and CV: OD (right eye) worsening; 2. Papilles (pupils): télangiectasie; squame blancrosis blancre; and so on.

While 20-11-2018 the Lens Thickness was: 4,81; 5.15 mm; on 6-02-2019 it became 4,66; 5.04 mm: a clearly worsening tendency. While the Baricenter Length was on 20-11-2018: 23,31; 23,26; it became on 6-02-2019 OD 22 and OS 22.50. And the Alcon MTA: 19 and 19.50. While White on White was 11,93; 11,85, it became 11,7 mm.


With the obvious worsening, Dr. Lesk's complete inaction is, as minimum, is perplexing and astonishing. He said that he wants to see me in 2 months.


In March, I received an unexpected call from the Royal Victoria Hospital's eye clinic, and was told that I have an appointment with Dr. Saheb: Tuesday, 19 March 2019 (at 9.15). However, when I came at 9.00, the secretary (the same who called about the appointment) said it was 18 Mar. 2019. I had this telephone conversation recorded, and there was clearly mentioned 19 March. It had to be something more then just a mistake, because the secretary did not blame me for not coming on 18 March, and just gave another appointment right away.


This event made everything even more unusual as the appointment with Dr. Saheb was not my initiative.


On 27 March 2019, Wednesday (13.30), I came to Dr. Saheb, who was very friendly and was not questioning my appearance in spite of his statement (and a written note to Dr. Lesk) that, starting from April 2018, I am Dr. Lesk's patient, not his.


Because this appointment was at the remission period, when my eyes' problems eased, the situation was much better. The IOP was OS (Left Eye) - 14, and OD (Right Eye) 13. Dr. Saheb said that to put down the risks and to improve my quality of life (my vision), I need several things, but, before everything, a cataract and the drainage system repairing surgeries, and the appropriate eye-glasses.


He said that the glaucoma in the Left Eye is more advanced than in the Right Eye, but still a relatively mild glaucoma... "It is hard to say if glaucoma has been advanced since November 2017, because a longer time span needed, and more visual field tests must be compared..." - he said. He also said that to be more than 3-5 years on Xalatan (Latanoprost) is dangerous.


Another unexpected appointment I got from the Maisonneuve-Rosemont hospital's Eye Clinic in July 2019. It was unexpected not because I did not supposed to have it. On the contrary, if Dr. Lesk said on 6 Feb. 2019 that he wants to see me in 2 months, in July 2 months became 7 months (more than half a year!), and, still, it was unexpected because I had to fight for every previous appointment.


So, on 11 July 2019 (9.20) I came to Dr. Lesk again. Dr. Lesk said that in 10-12 months he's going to perform another surgery (on top of the iridothomy that was done in May 2017): the same that Dr. Saheb was planning to perform in 2017 after a possible cataract surgery - to prevent the frequent glaucoma attacks. He avoided answering my questions, pretending that he did not hear them, and did not comment the borderline IOP, and other worsening signs. This time, Dr. Lesk interrupted my questions and did not allow me to describe new symptoms and the signs of worsening.


The visual acuity was 11-07-2019 - OD (R. Eye) 20x30+2 20x20-1; OS (L. Eye) 20x25 20x20-1.

IOP (11-07-2019): OD (R. Eye) 20; OS (L. Eye) 17; and, after, 20 and 16 correspondently.

Symptoms are mostly unreadable, and the rest was: GCFA, Blépharite 2ave; rosacée; télangiectasie.

Visual field and CV has shown a significant glaucoma advancing (OD [R. Eye] - seule diffuse; OS (L. Eye) - aureal amp .... (unreadable) ... (double) (?).


The rest (Dr. Lesk"s handwriting) is completely unreadable.

The diagnosis is marked as GCFA, télangiectasie, IOP elevated x dernier (?) RDV, CV + OCT double (?).


And, because Dr. Lesk"s writing was so unintelligible, it is impossible to know if he mentioned officially that he was planning a drainage repairing surgery. However, I have two witnesses (my wife and my daughter) and 2 documentary pieces of evidence that he mentioned it during our conversation on 11-07-2019.


Dr. Lesk told me that he wants to see me in 5-6 months. However, in the registry, they did not book any appointment for me around December 2019 or January 2020, but said that I"ll receive a call from them.


20-22 November 2019, I had another glaucoma attack: considerable pain in the Left Eye and Left Temple.


22 Nov. 2019, I managed to visit an optometrist at 15:30 (Sherbrook - McKay, near Concordia, Optique Town). The IOP was OS (Left eye) - 16, OD (Right eye) - 19. (Pneumatic no-contact test (less precise).


Between 23 November 2019 and 15 February 2020, I called Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont's Eye Clinic 5 times, but was refused an appointment with Dr. Lesk. Meanwhile, during the same period of time, a veritable glaucoma attack continued, mostly affecting the Left Eye and accompanied by blurry and double vision; red, teary, burning, and itchy eyes; and a number of other serious symptoms. This crisis was also accompanied by harsh psychological trauma of suffering and fear to become blind.


Having no access to Dr. Lesk, denied an appointment during 6 months after the last ophthalmologist"s exam, and experiencing an emergency situation, I sent an email directly to Dr. Lesk:


To Dr. Mark Lesk

Phone: (514) 252-3400 Ext. 4959

Fax: 514-251-7094, lesk@videotron.ca.

From: Lev Gunin, fax-tel. (........) (call before sending a fax), leog@total.net.


Dear Doctor Lesk!


The last rendezvous was on 11-th July 2019, and you told me that

you want to see me in 5-6 months. So, the next appointment should be

in December, 2019. When I was returning my chart, I told them that

the doctor wants to see me in December, 2019. There was no reaction.

In the end of November, I started to call the hospital for an appointment,

stressing that I am a patient with a non-stable pressure, and must see the

doctor as scheduled: otherwise the consequences can be very serious.

In response, I was told that I am over-reacting, that "after 6 months" is

in January (not in December), and that I better should not disturb them.

Then I called the hospital in December and in the beginning of January,

and the conversation was becoming less and less friendly. I was told that

the doctor's availability is not known yet, and that I must wait for a call

from the hospital patiently. However, half of February, 2020, is over, and

nobody called me about the appointment. Meanwhile, 2 times I had a

condition that I consider as 2 new acute attacks of the illness, and 1 time

I went to an alternative place to measure the IOP that was not very good.

I don"t know, who and why is blocking an appointment with you,

Doctor, but I consider this situation as a sabotage. The same situation was

in the English hospitals before. The secretariat used to delay the appointments

for 2-3 months, and the last time, after seeing the doctor on 20 Nov. 2017

(he said that he wants to see me in 3 months), I could not obtain an

appointment during 5 months, and, feeling completely abandoned, went

to the French hospital (where you, Doctor, work). So, I was forced to leave

a very good doctor, whom I trusted as I trust you, dear Doctor, because

of the secretariat's sabotage. When I was called by the English hospital

about the appointment with my previous doctor, I thought that the doctor

wants to see me, but found out that on 19 March 2019 was simply given

a routine appointment postponed since November, 2017! (Instead of

January, 2018).

Right now, I feel abandoned again by another hospital's clinic, as

it happened before.

Emergency rooms is not a solution: since October, 2018, I visited

emergency 2 times, and both times was left without having an access

to medical help.

Besides, now it is an alarming situation: I have pain and hemorrhages,

and I need an emergency appointment with you, Doctor.

I send you a photo of the bleeding area for evaluation (see in the attachment).

Sincerely, L.G. February, 14, 2020.


I resent this email on 15 February 2020, few hours before deciding to turn to Emergency (due to the worsening of the situation and left eye's internal bleeding, which was worsening), and Dr. Lesk responded (16 February 2020) by an email, which can be - possibly - evaluated as offensive, not considering my situation and its severe psychological impact:


Quoting Mark Lesk :


Reply: Re: Emergency Situation

Address Book

Switch Composition Method Switch to HTML composition


Text Quoting Mark Lesk :

Hi Leo I"ll ask that you be seen in the next few weeks. What your solution is is to find a competent optometrist who can check your pressure between appointments and send me a fax if too high.

There are too many patients here to be seen right on time. You are not alone.

Your use of the term Â" sabotage Â" suggests that you might want to consider finding another place to get your glaucoma care.

If you choose that option I am happy to transfer your file.

But I am happy to continue your care if you prefer to stay.

Regards Mark Lesk

Sent from my iPhone


On Feb 15, 2020, at 10:19 PM, leog@total.net wrote:

>> >> >> Dear Doctor!

>> The last rendezvous was on 11-th July 2019, and you told me that

>> you want to see me in 6 months. So, the next appointment should be

>> in December, 2019. When I was returning my chart, I told them that

>> the doctor wants to see me in December, 2019. There was no reaction.

>> In the end of November I started to call the hospital for an

>> appointment, stressing that I am a patient with a non-stable

>> pressure, and must see the doctor as scheduled: otherwise the

>> consequences can be very serious. In response, I was told that I am

>> over-reacting, that after 6 months is in January (not in December),

>> and that I better should not disturb them. Then I called the

>> hospital in December and in the beginning of January, and the

>> conversation was becoming less and less friendly. I was told that

>> the doctor?s availability is not known yet, and that I must wait for

>> a call from the hospital patiently. However, half of February, 2020,

>> is over, and nobody called me about the appointment. Meanwhile 2

>> times I had a condition that I consider 2 new acute attacks of the

>> illness, and 1 time I went to an alternative place to measure the

>> pressure that was not very good.

>> I don?t know, who and why is blocking an appointment with you,

>> Doctor, but I consider this situation as a sabotage. The same

>> situation was in the English hospitals before. The secretariat

>> used to delay the appointments for 2-3 months, and the last time,

>> after seeing the doctor on 20 Nov. 2017 (he said that he wants to

>> see me in 3 months), I could not obtain an appointment during 5

>> months, and, feeling completely abandoned, went to the French

>> hospital (where you, Doctor, work). So, I was force to leave a very

>> good doctor, whom I trusted as I trust you, dear Doctor, because of

>> the secretariat?s sabotage. When I was called by the English

>> hospital about the appointment with my previous doctor, I thought

>> that the doctor wants to see me, but found out that on 19 March 2019

>> was simply given a routine appointment postponed since November,

>> 2017! (Instead of January, 2018).

>> Right now I feel abandoned again by another hospital?s clinic,

>> as it happened before.

>> Emergency rooms is not a solution: since October, 2018, I

>> visited emergency 2 times, and both times left without having an

>> access to medical help.

>> Besides, now it is an alarming situation: I have pain and

>> hemorrhages, and I need an emergency appointment with you, doctor.

>> I send you a photo of the bleeding area for evaluation (see in

>> the attachment).

>> Sincerely, L.G.

>> >

Help Attach your contact information to the message?


Attachments

File 1:

(Maximum Attachment Size: 10,485,760 bytes)

Help

Save Attachments with message in sent-mail folder? Help


CHAPTER 4


I was not able to read his message until 21 February 2020, because was not capable to read at all due to my eyes' condition.


At night, from 15 to 16 February 2020 (Saturday - Sunday) I came to Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont Emergency Room with the Left Eye"s big hemorrhage + burning, pain, etc. On the early stage of Left Eye's internal bleeding the Lest Eye's vision acuity has improved, while the Right Eye's visual acuity became worse.


Near the Metro, I saw a driving school car, already known to me, and near the hospital: a police car already known to me (see below).


I came 15 minutes to midnight. Around 3:00 a.m. the IOP was checked (in the Emergency Department) - OS (Left Eye) - 22; OD (Right Eye) - 25. The visual acuity of the Left Eye was not worse then on 11-07-2019, Right Eye"s - much worse.


Medical documents from the Emergency reflect the gravity of my condition, in spite of Eye Clinic's and Dr. Lesk's attempts to downplay it. (See below).


While all other patients were given the chart in hand to carry from department to department, and from one medical office to another one, my chart was always delivered by a nurse, and, still, I managed to make copies. Later, comparing my copies to the copies, obtained from the medical archive, I discovered that some of the pages were missing from the medical archive, and others were scanned so badly that were unreadable. Here (below) is an example of a comparison between a copy that I made and the same page's copy from the medical archive:


The comparison of the copy I managed to make myself (the upper one) - and the copy, sent from the medical archive (below the 1-st one).


Plus, some of the pages are just missing.


In the triage nurse's report, there is an attempt to downplay the gravity of my condition, and to insinuate my words and statements. When asked - how I can grade the pain under the 0-10 grading scale, I said "12": because I find such a test ridiculous and not suiting all patients. However, the nurse just noted that I was, allegedly, "not capable" to judge about the "quantity and quality" of the pain (which was not true). The considerably high blood pressure was also ignored, in spite of its borderline gravity, near an alarming seriousness, and despite my declaration that I am normally having 120x80 or, mostly, 90-100x70 blood pressure all the time.


The IOP (measured between the triage evaluation and re-evaluation) was not mentioned at all. The triage nurse's evaluation of the Left Eye's internal bleeding was a controversial statement.


This dangerous glaucoma attack and the internal left eye's bleeding happened due to Maisonneuve-Rosemont Eye Clinic's and Dr. Lesk's sabotage of the urgent medical care, and my visit (22-11-2019) to Optique Town's optometrist at Sherbrook - McKay was not occasional, but due to the particular next glaucoma attack, which lasted till the middle of February 2020.


Here (below) are displayed: 1) a proof that I visited the optometrist on 22-11-2019; 2) the photo of my Left Eye's hemorrhage (taken when the eye just started to bleed, not at the most horrible stage); and 3) the triage nurse's report on 15-16 February 2020:


This photo of the left eye"s bleeding was taken before the Emergency, and at time of the triage assessment became 2-3 times worse. The damage to the pupil and the change of the iris' eye color (which was originally brown-gray-blue) due to 2 and a half years' usage of Xalatan is also visible.


Another page from the Emergency is missing the IOP as well:


However, another page, which was later missing from the medical archive, displays the IOP as well as the true objective information about the gravity and danger of my condition. There is no need to be a graphologist to see that this page's handwriting style corresponds to some of the other pages' handwriting, which is a sort of identification. But this page has no official identification, no date, no patient's name and file number, no hospital's or clinic's name or logo, no doctor's name (see below):


Such a violation of medical and legal ethics, standards and protocols - reveals a gruesome practice of hypocritical double-standards, when one layer of medical information (an "open source") - some pages - is available for the patient and authorized consultants, while another layer of medical information (the concealed (hidden) one; i.e. "other pages"): is strictly for the "internal use" and for the enforcement (oppressive) agencies. (I already presented the evidence of the same practice in English (affiliated with McGill university) hospitals. Now, I got an evidence that (on much lower scale) the same is practiced in the French hospitals as well).


Here, objectively, is given the visual acuity (OD (R. Eye) - 20x50 (?); SD (L. Eye) - 20x30); IOP: OS (L. Eye) - 22; OD (R. Eye) - 25 [dangerously above the norm (elevated)]; and also mentioned hyperemia and conjunctivitis (?) in the L. Eye, ulcer, sinus, and other dangerous pathologies. Summarizing the diagnosis, this report says "possible glaucoma... (attack?)" - and then follows something that I could not read.


It is significant that a special formulary page reserved for evaluation specifics, was left alone (not filled in) [see below], and the handwriting report was preferred and chosen instead.


On 16 February 2020 (Sunday), at 13:00, was scheduled an appointment with a duty ophthalmologist. I spent, waiting, around 5 (!) hours in the Maisonneuve-Rosemont Eye Clinic. The IOP was: L. Eye - 16; R. Eye - 19.


Next pages mention L. Eye's pain; permanent degradation and blurry of the R. Eye's vision; severe disphotopsia; blepharitis; rosacea; pupils' pathology; left eye's hemorrhage; eyes' fatigue; keratosis; fluctuating vision; lenses' problems; compulsive epidermises (?); diffusion; severely distorted peripheral vision; astigmatism; and a great number of other pathologies (unreadable writing), but, in spite of this, the doctor pretends that I am "dramatizing" the situation (having an anxiety). So, this obvious policy of pathologization of patient's natural (and justified) worries presents the same violation of the medical ethics and legal standards. (See below).


20 Feb 2020 - 7:45 8:00 - Ophthalmology - at Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont Follow-up after Emergency and emergency examination. IOP - L. Eye - 16; R. Eye - 18. 2-nd measurement by the ophthalmologist: L. Eye - 18; R. E. - 18.


Having an emergency situation, I did everything possible to obtain an appointment with Dr. Lesk, but was denied. From 16 to 20 February 2019, while in the hospital's eye clinic, I demanded an appointment with Dr. Lesk from a number of the medical workers, but was left without it.


Denied an appointment again, I sent 2 emails directly to Dr. Lesk, but was ignored by the Doctor.


Only alter the phone calls of my wife and my daughters (who expressed their outrage) to Maisonneuve-Rosenont Eye Clinic, the appointment was given, scheduled for 11 March 2020.


However, because - during the last appointment on 11-07-2019 - Dr. Lesk has interrupted me and did not allow me to describe the symptoms and the signs of worsening that disturbed me, I could describe them only in writing, and, so, sent another email directly to Dr. Lesk:


To Dr. Mark Lesk

Phone: (514) 252-3400 Ext. 4959

Fax: 514-251-7094, lesk@videotron.ca.

From: Lev Gunin, fax-tel. (.....) (call before sending a fax), leog@total.net.

Dear Dr. Lesk!

It might be important to describe new symptoms (after what happened on 15-16 February, 2020) in writing (before you see me on 11 Mar. 2020):

1. At night, not just halos and circles around all lights (as before), but huge balls of rays and

"needles" + 2 shining "stains" on both sides of a lamp or another source of light.

2. Nimbus around the brightest objects at daytime.

3. I see now traces of lighter colors on darker colors (like snow in the picture on picture"s frame).

4. More clouds and whitish "stains": now even against darker surfaces, while before they appeared only on a white background.

5. A sensation that my eyes are full of sand when I wake up in the morning.

6. Less ability to see in darkness; less (and more slow) accommodation in darkness after a shined

room.

7. Everything appeared unsharp.

8. Vision acuity has degraded + loss of acuity after 5-7 min. of reading or writing.

9. I woke up few times with a fog in 1 or both eyes.

10. Wrong appearance of colors.

These are just few of them (however, there is some restoration of vision after Feb. 28).

Regards,

L.G.


Later the appointment, which was scheduled on 11 March, was transferred to 12 March 2020 by the hospital.


At night, from 9 to 10 March 2020, I was badly injured under very suspicious circumstances. It is very likely that this incident was staged. However, I still had good reaction, and, possibly, could avoid such a bed outcome if not the stressful situation, which has contributed to the injuries. The most important role has played 2 dermatologists' refusal to remove a dangerous lesion, and, because I was very upset, my reaction became inadequate and I became fragile. The second factor was my vision's further degrading, which, maybe, played even a more important role, especially the further degradation of my nocturne vision. By refusing me the adequate ophthalmological procedures, and, simultaneously, the appropriate appointments' timing, the hospital (its eye clinic) and (possibly) Doctor Mark Lesk personally have contributed to my injuries.


Because of my injuries, I was not able to visit Dr. Lesk on 12 Mar. 2020 (Thursday, at 9.30), and my wife contacted the hospital for the cancellation on 9 March 2020, having received another appointment instead, scheduled for 22 April 2020 (9.30). However, the hospital (the eye clinic) abruptly cancelled this appointment, without giving any other date.


Only on 20 Aug. 2020, I could see Dr. Lesk at 13:00: more than 1 year after the previous appointment with him! (Before 20 Aug. 2020, I saw him on 11 July 2019).


I have a grounded suspicion that I was granted this appointment exclusively because the prescription of my medications has expired, not because the eye's clinic administration, the secretaries, and Dr. Lesk cared about my vision's safety and about me. As far as I know, another protocol acts for the yearly prescription of the eye-drops, especially Xalatan. I think that, if not this issue, they would ignore my condition and the need of the appointment again.


This time, it was extremely difficult to speak to Dr. Lesk. He was irritated and refused to answer my questions. When I asked why the non-appropriate timing of the appointments so abruptly compromises my visual safety, he began to speak aggressively about the Covid-19 Pandemic, and, when I reminded to him that BEFORE the Pandemic it was just the same (NO difference!), he became even more hostile.


He did not deny telling me on 11 July 2019 that in 10-12 months he's going to perform the drainage system's repairing surgery, but just ignored my question about when this surgery will be done. I asked him the same question 2 or 3 times, but he (without contesting that he planned such a surgery indeed) did not say anything. He refused to reply to my question if my vision is safe without such a surgery (drainage-repairing) and how dangerous is my condition.


By then - in August 2020, - it was the last chance for me to have a drainage repairing and cataract surgery, because in 2021 it became already not safe (even dangerous) to pass such a surgery for people like me in the situation of the advancing of the PUNITIVE health-care. If Dr. Lesk would offer me a cataract surgery in August 2020, I would give my consent, but not in 2021.


When I asked Dr. Lesk if he sees no advances of glaucoma, and the optical nerve's (and other eye structures') further damage since 11 July 2019 (according to CV, OCT, visual field, and other tests), he replied that he sees "just the same, no any changes". At this moment he was looking at the computer screen with the colored digital image (ONH and RFNL OU Analysis: Optic Disk Cube). His words have perturbed his own assistant, who was present in the room at this moment. Contesting Dr. Lesk's words, she said that she sees a negative change to the worse in the Right Eye. Interrupting her, and preventing her from speaking, Dr. Lesk abruptly "corrected" her, emphasizing that there is "nothing to worry about". It was difficult to understand, what he means: he considers these changes "insignificant", or denies them at all. However, judging by his reaction, there were, probably, quite significant changes, in result of his and his clinic's negligent (moderately speaking!) actions.


I made a remark that, even if these changes are "insignificant", he should not conceal them from his patient. Dr. Lesk did not say, in the response, that there are no changes, actually recognizing them.


When I asked Dr. Lesk's assistant about the IOP, she said it was 19 and 20, but when I asked Dr. Lesk about 2 of today's IOP tests, he said that both times it was "around 17". Hearing his words, his assistant added that he, probably, forgot about 19 and 20, and he said nothing in response. Later, when I obtained medical documents from my chart, I found that the initial handwriting digits "20" and "19" were "corrected" (changed, altered) to "17" and "17", while the digit 20 was just crossed over!


Following this appointment (20 Aug. 2020) I sent 3 emails to Dr. Lesk, emphasizing that some of his and his clinic's actions and claims are nor acceptable. And, among them, the following message:


to this message on 21/08/20 11:09:34 PM.


Inbox: Re: ------- 5 important questions ---------- (1 of 29)

Personal Answered

Mark as:


Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2020 21:31:09 -0400 [09:31:09 PM EDT]

From: Mark Lesk

To: leog@total.net

Subject: Re: ------- 5 important questions ----------

I answered inside your email below


Sent from my iPhone


[Hide Quoted Text]

On Aug 21, 2020, at 2:06 PM, leog@total.net wrote:


ï"¿


To: Dr. Mark Lesk

Phone: (514) 252-3400 Ext. 4959; Fax: 514-251-7094, lesk@videotron.ca.

_______________

From: Lev Gunin, 514-499-1294; leog@total.net.


Dear Dr. Lesk!

Yesterday you have abruptly interrupted (and terminated) my questions, telling that I must "stop bombarding" you by "paranoiac messages", and that the considerable further worsening of my vision and new worrying symptoms are just "subjective hypochondriac paranoia", while "in reality" my eyes need no medical care at the present time (and that 6 thousand patients are "behind" me on the waiting list).


= I did not say subjective hypochondriac paranoia. My use of the word paranoia was with reference to what you had written about not being able to obtain an appointment with me, not your symptoms =


However, 5 important questions must be answered indisputably:

1. On 11 July 2020 you, Dr. Lesk, said that in 10-12 months you are going to perform another surgery (on top of the iridothomy [May 2017]). Yesterday, on 20 Aug. 2020, you did not mention it at all. Does it mean: my eyes? condition so drastically improved that no surgical procedure is required?


= I did not see you in July 2020 =


2. Your assistant said (before and when you were discussing my case) that the glaucoma is slowly advancing in my right eye. Asked about it, you, Doctor, did not respond "yes, glaucoma is progressing" or "no", but said "there is nothing to worry about".

Was your assistant wrong?


= There was no significant change =


Evaluating the images, you compared 2 last ones (11 Jul. 2020; and the present). I also noticed only 2 Ocular Coherence Tomogrophy tests in my file. Are all 5 previous OCT tests? digital images still in the database? Then why not to compare 1-6, not just 5-6?


= I compared this weeks to you first baseline =


3. The IOP was yesterday 19 (l.e.) and 20 (r.e.). (No pain or pressure sensation). I suggested: this confirms that few attacks [since Dec. 2020] of acute eyes pain, eye balls hardening, and other symptoms - could indicate IOP even higher then 20 (like it was in ER). You responded by saying that such a borderline IOP is "absolutely normal", and that I don?t "need 14-15". Are you sure that IOP 20+ is not potentially dangerous in glaucoma patients?


= You had three exams at HMR ophthalmology in the last few months and there were no abnormal IOPs. Your symptoms seem to be related to your cornea. =


4. When I responded to your question (what did I do about multiple eye infections since Dec. 2019) that I washed my eyes and applied tea bags, you said: "You see, evidently no medical intervention was needed". Don?t you think that the infections, which (as I told you) lasted 1,5-2 weeks anyways, were destroying my eyes, and that they reoccurred because 2 first ones (Dec. 2019, Feb. 2020) were untreated?


= No =


5. When I brought to your attention that "during today?s visual acuity test" I could not see even the biggest letters without looking through the plastic with the holes, you said the visual acuity was so bad because of the dry eyes. Are you sure about it?


= Yes, dry eyes, cornea, refraction. That is what the plastic holes compensate for. =


To my question about the Perimetry Test you did not respond clearly. So, my question remains the same: did it confirmed glaucoma advancing and further vision?s degradation, or not?


= Not =


Yours truly,

L.G. 21 Aug 2020


_______


CHAPTER 5


Evidently, my email was altered and distorted by strange "?" marks, and by some other garble, and, surely, not Dr. Lesk did it. So, there is a legitimate question: why the text of my emails is always twisted in Dr. Lesk's replies? What causes such a distortion?


There is no need to be a lawyer, a judge, or an ophthalmologist to see that Dr. Lesk is not telling the truth in his reply, and conceals, or, to put it differently, slurs over the truth. Instead of a remorse or an apology after receiving my report on injuries, and my complains about the worsening vision, which contributed to what has happened to me; he was still denying me an adequate and absolutely necessary ophthalmological care. Still, here is a clear sign of his repentance and remorse, because he, at least, answered my questions and did not ignore my worries. So, there is an evident change in his ethical position towards the improvement. We don't know about the forces and motives behind his conduct, because in the present situation around the health-care doctor might be forced to do wild things, but the very fact of the softening of his position is already speaks about him positively.


However, Dr. Lesk's reply requires further analysis, because something very disturbing still presents in it:


1. In my original RTF file, which text I copied to my email, it was written "11 July 2019", so, I don"t know why the date 11 July 2020 appeared in my email, but if even this date was misprinted instead of "2020", Dr. Lesk - obviously - has perfectly understood that I mean "11 July 2019". So, by answering "I did not see you in July 2020", he just used it as a pretext not to answer my question. He's obviously evading to answer my next question: "On 11 July 2019, you, Dr. Lesk, said that in 10-12 months you are going to perform another surgery (on top of the iridothomy [May 2017]). Yesterday, on 20 Aug. 2020, you did not mention it at all. Does it mean: my eyes' condition so drastically improved that no surgical procedure is required?".

He did not say "yes" or "no", or did not give any explanation about the drainage system"s repairing surgery, which, he said (on 11 July 2019) he's going to perform in 10-12 months.


2. Asked "Your assistant said (before and when you were discussing my case) that the glaucoma is slowly advancing in my right eye. Asked about it, you, Doctor, did not respond "yes, glaucoma is progressing" or "no", but said "there is nothing to worry about". Was your assistant wrong?", Dr. Lesk responded: "There was no significant change". So, he had to admit the negative changes, but did not apologize for concealing them.


3. Answering my question "Are you sure that IOP 20+ is not potentially dangerous in glaucoma patients?", Dr. Lesk answered: "You had three exams at HMR ophthalmology in the last few months and there were no abnormal IOPs. Your symptoms seem to be related to your cornea", - which is just not true. Here (below) I give just 4 examples of the IOP reports of 20 and 20+ during the exams at Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital's Eye Clinic (i.e. during the appointments with Dr. Lesk and Dr. Tassot), but there were few more, and he is completely aware of them:


16-02-2020. See the whole document above, under the appropriate date.


20-08-2020. Right Eye - 20; Left Eye - 19. "Corrected" (forged! fraud!) to 17 and 17. See the whole document below.


10 February, 2018. IOP: Left Eye - 29; Right Eye - 24. This page is not from the Maisonneuve-Rosemont, but from the Royal Victoria"s Eye Clinic, but its copy was handed over to Dr. Lesk later in 2018.


February, 2018. IOP: 17 and 20.


The initial handwriting digits "20" and "19" were "corrected" (changed, altered) to "17" and "17". The digit 20 was just crossed over! Who did it? Dr. Lesk? Very likely. Or, may be, it was not him? But, whoever did it, has committed a true fraud, which evaluation I live for the reader, because I don't wish to attach here any epithets.


4. In my 4-th question to Dr. Lesk, I asked him: When I responded to your question (what did I do about multiple eye infections since Dec. 2019) that I washed my eyes and applied tea bags, you said: "You see, evidently no medical intervention was needed". Don"t you think that the infections, which (as I told you) lasted 1,5-2 weeks anyways, were destroying my eyes, and that they reoccurred because 2 first ones (Dec. 2019, Feb. 2020) were untreated?", - he answered "No". Obviously, this is more then just a breach of the medical ethics.


5. Finally, asked "When I brought to your attention that "during today's visual acuity test" I could not see even the biggest letters without looking through the plastic with the holes, you said the visual acuity was so bad because of the dry eyes. Are you sure about it?", he responded: "Yes, dry eyes, cornea, refraction. That is what the plastic holes compensate for".

He, obviously, "forgot" to mention dozens of other possible reasons for the visual acuity's degradation.


The medical documents from 20 Aug. 2020 reflect all mentioned above violations of patient's rights and medical (and "not only medical") ethics.


Here they are (see below).


Attacks against a patient; near non-medical remarks about the patient; psychological and behavioral profiling; and other highly unethical characteristics of a patient (including a false statement about the eye's hygiene involved) had a goal to accuse the patient himself in his ophthalmological problems and problems of the relationship with the eye clinic. It is non-doubtfully a smear campaign similar of a smear campaign against any ideological "enemy" ("the enemy of the state"). A political content of this kind of discrediting remarks originates from the similarity, because such methods were widely known as methods employed by the Soviet regime against its political opponents. Similar methods were employed by the state (Dr. Lesk"s native country), which played a key role in toppling my refugee case in Canada back in 1994-1998, performing a smear (a defamation) campaign. And the similar methods were employed by the Immigration agency against me in 1994-2004.


In my native city of Bobruisk, I was ostracized, persecuted, attacked, insulted, abused, and offended by the members of the local pseudo-ethnic community. Vicious intrigues, provocations, mean betrayals, boycotts, etc. - made my existence miserable. The majority of the local pseudo-ethnic population was made of the petty bourgeoises, lumpiness men, and the scandalous women, who detested and hated my intelligence, softness, honesty, delicateness, and pacifism. They supported violence and terrorist methods in achieving their goals. And because my personality was completely different, and not compatible with their "average" mentality, I became a victim of bulling and mockeries. The most meanness and cruel penalty within this community was to declare someone mentally defective. It was equal to the capital punishment. This could be done even to a person with the healthiest psychic (sanity), and the mistreatment started right away. A victim, declared mentally defective, was exposed to all mockeries and prosecutions, being intentionally pushed to suicidal "solution" as to an "exit". These bastards employed not only verbal and contrivable violence against me, but I was also physically attacked and seriously injured. And, in addition, I was persecuted by KGB!


Many of my haters and enemies have immigrated to other countries, where they had some influence on people, who occupied very influential positions, including the country, mentioned in my refugee claim. This is how the same slander and defamation libel migrated behind me to Montreal. So, an undeniable link between such doctors as Dr. Brian Morris and Dr. Mark Lesk with the same environment is undeniable, as they employed the same libel and same methods as those, employed by the hooligans in my native town of Bobruisk. 2 other doctors, who tried to exploit the same swindling smear "technology", were "hired" by the government, and, in general, their style of using this smudge was completely different. However, Dr. Morris and Dr. Lesk exploited this "pedal" EXACTLY as the mean people from my native city, with an only difference that Dr. Lesk appeared to be morally saner, realized his inexcusable mistake, and started to back down. I believe that he also realized that people, who manipulated him, don't deserve to be heard.


And, finally, this phrase is crowning the whole biased manifestation of Dr. Lesk partiality, non-neutrality, and political involvement: "Patient needed (?) to stop Paranoiac messages".


After this (last) appointment, I never got another appointment with Dr. Lesk, nor from the hospital (from the eye clinic), nor from Dr. Lesk. In return, I did not want to see Dr. Lesk again, even before seeing the last pages of my chart with his insulting remarks. As soon as I realized that he was not telling the truth - concealing the advance of glaucoma, - and fibbed about the IOP (forging the indexes), I realized that it might be dangerous to continue visiting Dr. Lesk. However, the desperate condition of my vision has forced me to seek an appointment with him between 20 August 2020 and August 2021. But, despite the alarming situation with my eyes, I could not get any new appointment with Dr. Lesk any more.


I did all possible attempts to find another ophthalmologist, but all in vain. Since August 2020, I visited optometrists 3 times, asking for a referral to an ophthalmologist, and stressing that my current ophthalmologist abandoned me. I demanded a referral to an ophthalmologist from my family doctor in April 2020, and then in March 2021, with no result. It is also important to stress that all optometrists, whom I visited in 2018-2021, refused to give me a written statement about the IOP.


I have no idea if this concerns the Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital as well, but I heard rumors and complains, that, since approximately 2011, the medical staff of Montreal hospitals is prioritizing friends, relatives, or VIP persons, or even taking bribes, leaving others in a limbo, with an inacceptable or indefinite waiting time.


Finally, I managed to obtain a referral to Dr. Nguyen, but this referral simply became just another ordeal, because the whole system is corrupt, and it seems that all former non-hospital public medical institutions were recently (in 2019-2021) privatized or made semi-private, leaving all patients of my socioeconomic status (a big part of the society) without any access to the most basic health needs.


Here is what happened to me in the relatively recently established semi-private GMF network, which consumed a great part of the former public health institutions.


On 31 May 2021 (Monday), I supposed to see Dr. Tuong Nam Nguyen at GMF clinic at 2529 rue Allard. [Centre Medical Metro Monk. (GMF Clinic Reseau)] (I had to call 3 times during 4 days (then my wife called) before getting the correct time and date).


The secretary has processed my medical care card, which means that the doctor withdrew public money from RAMQ.


From the very beginning, I told Dr. Nguyen's assistant that I have an impair hearing, and that my vision acuity had sharply declined. Asked if I am wearing glasses, I responded that I can not afford such an expense. Thus, my socioeconomic situation became abundantly clear for her.


Then I complained about the left eye pain and possible high or borderline IOP, and glaucoma advancement.


After that, when I asked her about IOP re-measuring (by a non-pneumatic device), she said that I am not going to see the doctor today, and handed over - to me - a clinic's card, telling that my next appointment is on Wednesday (without announcing the precise date). Seeing that I am not looking at the card, and realizing that I am probably not capable to read without glasses, she made no further comments.


I must stress that this appointment card was given after my above mentioned complaints, and its date was not revised due to borderline IOP (18 and 19) and (according to my impression) my statement that I can see abruptly less flashing dots then during the last visual field test.


When I asked her if on Wednesday I am going to see the doctor, she gave no clear answer, which was obviously a sign that even my next appointment could be for the tests only, not for the meeting with Dr. Nguyen.


Only at home, pulling out the card, I discovered that the appointment date is 14 July 2021, and that, besides, it written (on the back of the card): $80.


On 1 Jun. 2021, I called the clinic, looking for answers. The secretary told me that:


1) The clinic is private (not SEMI-private, but PRIVATE);

2) It is impossible to see Dr. Nguyen earlier then 14 July 2021, or I should go to an Emergency room;

3) She claimed that I am absolutely obliged to pay 80 dollars, as the RAMQ card did not cover one of the tests.

When I asked her, why nobody warned me about the cost, and why this payable test was done without my consent (adding that 80-dollar bill is a real disaster in my situation), she said nothing.


Then I added that I supposed to receive an official receipt, not a handwritten sign. She put me on hold... forever...


On 3 July 2021 - I spoke to another secretary, who was more honest and objective, but put me on hold for too long, while my old phone is dying too quickly.


Concerning the above mentioned facts, there are few more questions:


1. Is it ethically acceptable - to divide the ophthalmological tests and doctor's examination by 1,5 (one and a half) months of waiting time (or, maybe, even an indefinite time, because I was given no assurance that on 14 July 2021 I could see the doctor)?

2. What is the role and the justification of the existence of this particular clinic (and the GMF Clinic Network in general) - if I must go to Emergency (as the secretary said) [especially in the pandemic and systematic abuse of ER patients]?

3. How can the clinic justify $80 while providing no medical treatment, no medical examination (it is not clear if I would see Dr. Nguyen, even on 14 Jul. 2021, or this appointment was scheduled just for another money extortion), and obviously keeping the tests" results for themselves?

4. What did Dr. Nguyen do for me? Obviously, nothing.


So, I was forced to cancel the 14 Jul. 2021 appointment, but demanded the copies of the exams (tests) done on 31 May 2021.


Summarizing the most important facts:


I was not examined by Dr. Nguyen; instead, I was offered just the tests; one of the assistants gave me an appointment card, and said that the next appointment was scheduled for Wednesday. I asked her if I"ll see the doctor next time, but she responded so evasively that it was not clear.

At home, looking at the card, I discovered that the next appointment would take place not on 2 June 2021 (this Wednesday), but on 14 July 2021 - and on the back of the card I read: 80$.

When on 1 June 2021 I called the clinic, the secretary lied to me saying that the clinic is private, while it is run by the government, so, even a "SEMI-private" status is disputable.

She told me that it is impossible to see Dr. Nguyen earlier then 14 July 2021, or I should go to Emergency, and this violates the GMF Clinic Network Charter, which states that the GMF Networks was established to help patients without a family doctor or in emergency situations to see a doctor (or a specialist) (?).

She claimed that I am absolutely obliged to pay 80 dollars, as the RAMQ card did not cover one of the tests, and this claim was later refuted by her and by another secretary, which means that she was telling a lie again.


I found out that the GMF Clinics Network was initially established for the benefits of patients, who have no access to family doctors or to medical specialists, NOT for pushing further the limits of savage privatization and racket-style money extortion.


On 3 June 2021 - I spoke to another secretary, who was more honest and whose words contradicted to what the previous nurse said.

Because my questions and concerns were unanswered, I sent a fax (4 Jun. 2021) to Centre Medical Metro Monk (514) 769-9399), questioning the ethicality and legality of 1) dividing the tests and the ophthalmologist's exam by an infinitive amount of time (for patient with an urgent medical necessity); 2) charging a patient by 80$ without any warnings, consent, and despite his socioeconomic situation; 3) scheduling an appointment regardless of an urgency (for patient [who has no access to ophthalmologists and ophthalmological care for 1 year!] with advanced glaucoma, borderline IOP, worsening vision, and danger, revealed by last 2-years test's data).

Same day (4 June 2021) I called the clinic and cancelled the appointment for 14-Jul-2021, and - also - demanded the copies of the tests done on 31 May 2021.

On 9 June 2021, I was contacted (by phone) by Dr. Nguyen"s secretary, who told me that I am not obliged to pay 80$ now, but - without the payable test (and without my payment for it) - my glaucoma cannot be accessed and treated. But she insisted that I should visit Dr. Nguyen anyway, to tell him that I don't have the 80$ and to see "what he can do for you [for me]". Otherwise, she said, the whole data of the tests will be destroyed.

Answering to my desire of having a referral from Dr. Nguyen to another ophthalmologist, she said that Dr. Nguyen couldn't give me such a referral until he sees me, to base it on his assessment. When I argued that the referral could be based on the data of the tests, she claimed that, if I am not going to see Dr. Nguyen, the whole data would be destroyed.

Highly disturbed by this conversation, on 18 June 2021, I made another call, again demanding the tests' copies. The secretary told me that I will not receive the copies until I see the doctor, and putted my admissibility by the doctor in the dependence of my payment of 80$ bill.

Deceptive and contradictive statements of Center's secretaries are very scary and violate the basic norms.

It is dangerous just to visit such a medical institution.


On 21 June 2021 (at 8:40 a.m.), the nurse or the secretary contacted me from Centre Medical Metro Monk of GMF (she called from (514) 769-3399), and told that all my tests and everything concerning my file have been destroyed (été déchiré).

In 18 June 2021 conversation (see above) nothing was said about the destruction of my file's data; so, the tests-exams results of 31 May 2021 and my whole file were obviously erased as a reaction to my demand of the tests' copies.

There could be possible elements of a criminal misconduct here.


It is hard to believe that such a regulation that allows to destroy patient's medical data without patient's consent, but, on the contrary, after patient's verbal and written desire to obtain copies of that medical data, - exists, but even if it would existed it would be illegal, because violates patient's rights and the basic human rights principles.


When, after the ordeal with Dr. Nguyen, my hope to see another ophthalmologist (not Dr. Lesk) has completely disappeared, I called the Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital's Eye Clinic, and left a message (June 2021) but they never contacted me in response. Then I called the clinic again, and, this time, I spoke to a secretary, who instantly dismissed my indignation about the lack of appointments, and said that I must patiently wait for an appointment. At the end of the conversation, she was speaking in a mean, hostile tone.


26 April 2021, I sent a fax to Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital's Medical Archive and to the Eye Clinic, simultaneously demanding an access to my medical file.


In July 2021, receiving the eye-drops, I discovered that the prescription has expired. It was just astonishing, because now Dr. Lesk and the Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital's Eye Clinic not just denied me an access to the ophthalmological care, but also refused to extend the prescription, which was not just the violation of the doctor-patient protocols, but also the violation of drugs regulating and prescribing protocols. In response to that shocking discovery, I sent a message to Dr. Lesk:


Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2021 15:19:45 -0400 [03:19:45 PM EDT]

From: leog@total.net

To: lesk@videotron.ca

Subject: Re: prescription


To Dr. Mark Lesk,

Hopital Maisonneuve-Rosemont,

Phone: (514) 252-3400 Ext. 4959; Fax: 514-251-7094, lesk@videotron.ca.


Dear Dr. Lesk!

My last appointment with you, Doctor, was on 20 Aug. 2021.

It is almost a year since then.

It means that you abandoned a patient with an advanced and advancing glaucoma, and unstable, borderline IOP!

You told me, Dr. Lesk, 4 times (during my 4 last visits) that you don't want me as your patient, dismissing my warnings that I may not be able to find another ophthalmologist.

You don't even care about renewing the eye-drops prescription, being perfectly aware of the inevitable damage to my eyes without these 2 eye-drops.

What I cannot understand - is how such an ethical person as you (as you definitely were (if I can read people) became ...

I tried very hard to find another ophthalmologist, but all my attempts have failed.

Since 20 Aug. 2021, I had innumerous episodes of painful eyes (especially the L. Eye), combined with headaches (temples+nape), and intraocular bleedings. My IOP was measures 3 times (since Aug. 2021) by optometrists and in a walk-in clinic, with the borderline indications (18, 20; and 19, 20). Potentially, there is a possibility of further irreversible eyes damage, linked to these risks. Besides, there is also a harsh psychological trauma, caused by the worrisome fact that I am completely deprived of the ophthalmological care, which is a tremendous violation of my rights.

2 times I called your clinic about the absence of an appointment, but was met with such aggressiveness and hostility that it put an end for my inquiries.

Till now, I did not want to contact you any more after your definition of my worries as "paranoiac messages", and my moral judgment of the medical misconduct (such as abandoning a patient with an advanced and advancing glaucoma, and unstable, borderline IOP) as "subjective hypochondriac paranoia".

I would never contact you again, Doctor Lesk, if not the expiring prescription of my eye-drops. It is possible that even if I would manage to book an appointment with another ophthalmologist, it can take months before I'll see a doctor, and, meanwhile, I could be left without the medications,

12 July, 2021.


Dr. Lesk just ignored my message; he did not reply. And, because the renewal of the eye-drops prescription became a burning emergency issue, Friday, 16 July 2021, I sent another email with the same message. Simultaneously, I also sent a fax to Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital's Eye Clinic, appealing now not only to Dr. Lesk personally, but also to hospital's administration:


To: Hopital Maisonneuve-Rosemont,

Phone: (514) 252-3400 Ext. 4959; Fax: 514-251-7094.

From: Gunin, Lev; tel. 514-(.....).


Dear Sir or Lady!

My last appointment with the ophthalmologist was in mid-Aug. 2021.

It is almost a year since then.

It means that I (a patient with an advanced and advancing glaucoma, and unstable, borderline IOP) was abandoned by the doctor and by the clinic!

Even the eye-drops prescription was not renewed, and now expired, while you are being perfectly aware of the inevitable and irreversible consequences.

On 12 July 2021, I sent a message to Dr. Lesk via email, but he did not reply.

2 days ago I managed to book an appointment with another ophthalmologist (not in your hospital) but it does not guaranty that a doctor could examine me in August 2021, and that my eye-drops could be renewed. For example, when (in May, 2021) I came to see a doctor in Montreal West, I was only examined by his assistant, who scheduled another (payable) series of tests in 2 months, without even scheduling an appointment with the ophthalmologist himself, and, because my socioeconomic situation do not allow me to pay for their services, my access to this doctor was blocked.

2 times (since August 2020) I called your clinic about the absence of an appointment, but an unfriendly tone put an end of my inquiries.

I would never contact your clinic and Doctor Lesk again, if not the expired prescription of my eye-drops and the need to renew the administrating of the medications.

16 July, 2021.


It is important to stress that Dr. Lesk replied not to my message from 16 July 2021, but to my email from 12 July 2021, pretending that his response to my previous message was adequate, while it was not (he just ignored the previous message, in spite of its urgency). Here is his response:


Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2021 00:15:59 -0400 [17/07/21 12:15:59 AM EDT]

From: Mark Lesk

To: leog@total.net

Subject: Re: prescription


This message was written in a character set (utf-8) other than your own.

If it is not displayed correctly, click here to open it in a new window.


I renew all prescriptions requested by fax from pharmacists. Ask your pharmacist to send a fax. I did not see a request for renewal from you in any form.

I think you might have the wrong fax number but I cannot remember it. Please call to check.

All patients are being see after twice the desired delay because during COVID the clinic is at reduced capacity due to social distancing.

Please email me your HMR hospital number and the spelling of your last name and I will assign you an appointment in august.

Please obtain written notes from your optometrists regarding the IOPs measured.


This will be the LAST time I warn you to desist from making personal attacks on me. Any further attacks will obligate me to TERMINATE your care with me immediately. You will have to seek care elsewhere.

Regards

Mark Lesk MD


[Hide Quoted Text]

On Jul 12, 2021, at 3:20 PM, leog@total.net wrote:


?

To Dr. Mark Lesk,

Hopital (...) [.........]


_____


CHAPTER 6


This message reveals a reverse of Dr. Lesk's regret about his previous approach to a patient, and his revision of his actions. He just returned to his former tactic, abandoning his temporally compassionate position and his more human treatment. You don't have to be a psychologist to realize that this last shift in Dr. Lesk's conduct could not happen without a pressure, or, at least, strong influence of other people ("bad guys"), because this letter is just amazing due to its insincerity and hypocrisy.


Let's start from the very 1-st sentence: "I renew all prescriptions requested by fax from pharmacists. Ask your pharmacist to send a fax. I did not see a request for renewal from you in any form".


The basic issue here is not HOW the request for a renewal is presented, but WHAT Dr. Lesk DID (by not only abandoning a patient, but also - by not renewing the crucial prescription), and he perfectly knows it. The renewal of a prescription, which is life or death for a patient, is not patient's duty as Dr. Lesk is trying to present.


Secondly, he's deliberately putting his patient's vision at risk by deliberately postponing the renewal of the eye-drops even further, instead of just signing a new prescription. A renewal of medications' prescription is not patient's duty, but the duty of a doctor and a pharmacy. Dr. Lesk was aware that the pharmacy was obliged to contact him, but did not do it, violating its obligation, and now not the patient, but the doctor has to contact the pharmacists.


Thirdly, he is dishonest when claiming that he does not see "a request for renewal from you in any form". While actually responding (!) to my request for medications' renewal, he claims that there is no such a request. What a level of hypocrisy he has employed by claiming anything like this!


"All patients are being see after twice the desired delay because during COVID the clinic is at reduced capacity due to social distancing".


An obvious dishonesty again: not because the delays are not happening, but because BEFORE the "Covid" excuse" (serving for further deprivation of the less privileged classes of the health care) I was ALREADY deprived of the ophthalmological care and was refused an appointment during the same periods of time.


"Please email me your HMR hospital number and the spelling of your last name and I will assign you an appointment in august".


Besides the very obvious fact that Dr. Lesk knows my last name very well, my last name appeared in all my messages to him. My email, which I sent on 12 July 2021, was a very single exclusion. I am normally - at first - composing my messages in the Word Pad (in rtf format), and then I copy them to the email body. But, because I live in such a degree of a harsh socioeconomic situation and have no money to buy a new computer mouse, the select-copy-paste operation sometimes go weird, so, my name under the text was not copied (without my notice). Partly, my failure to notice it was due to my constantly worsening vision, and Dr. Lesk is very well aware of it. His trick with responding not to my fax from 16 July 2021 (which he obviously received), but to my email from 12 July 2021 (which he first ignored), and pretending that he does not know - who I am: it is just another deceptive method, which goal was to justify his refusal to reply to my 1-st email (sent on 12 July 2021) and to twist the essence of the issue, by sending its content from the real problem to a wrong direction. I obviously re-sent a copy of my 12 July 2021 email on 16 July 2021.


One of Dr. Lesk's phrases has betrayed him, because, if he wrote that "I think you might have the wrong fax number but I cannot remember it. Please call to check": it means that he perfectly realizing who I am and does not need my family name rechecked.


"Please obtain written notes from your optometrists regarding the IOPs measured".


I informed Dr. Lesk verbally and in writing innumerous times that, first, I have an extreme hardship to see an optometrist, and, secondly, they ALWAYS refuse a written note about the IOP. So, this is just another dishonest claim and a cover up attempt.


In my reply, I could mention all this to Dr. Lesk, but I don't desire any confrontation, because not vengeance, not desire of financial compensation, and not declarative statements are fueling my quest for justice. The strongest motivation behind this report and my attitude towards the most shocking unethical medical behavior is a presumption that - when people are suffering because of other peoples' actions, - this is a manifestation of torture, and must be eliminated in any shape and form.


I have no anger against Dr. Lesk; on the opposite, he is sympathetic to me as a human being, and I wish him all the best. However, I am fighting for my life and for my rights not to die and not to become a vegetable because of the deprivation of healthcare. My family, my wife, my children and my grandchildren need me, and some actions of doctors - like some particular actions of Dr. Lesk, who at some moments becomes consumed by a monster of mercilessness: pitiful, but must be exposed, which helps other potential victims to avoid them.


So, in spite of all my conclusions about his response, I replied by rather a conciliatory answer:


Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2021 11:15:43 -0400 [11:15:43 AM EDT]

From: leog@total.net

To: Mark Lesk

Subject: Re: prescription


Isn't it your obligation to be sure that

the IOP-controlling prescription for

a glaucome patient MUST be renewed

in time, Dr. Lesk? Whose responsibility

it that: Doctor's or patient's?


Why you can not renew the prescription

without the pharmacy's request (as I am

not in a positiopn to tell the pharmacy

what to do)?


My pharmacy is the (....) at rue

(....) in (.....),


regards,

L. G.

[the confidential information removed for security reasons]


Quoting Mark Lesk :


[Hide Quoted Text]

I renew all prescriptions requested by fax from pharmacists. Ask your pharmacist to send a fax. I did not see a request for renewal from you in any form.

I think you might have the wrong fax number but I cannot remember it. Please call to check.

All patients are being see after twice the desired delay because during COVID the clinic is at reduced capacity due to social distancing.

Please email me your HMR hospital number and the spelling of your last name and I will assign you an appointment in august.

Please obtain written notes from your optometrists regarding the IOPs measured.


This will be the LAST time I warn you to desist from making personal attacks on me. Any further attacks will obligate me to TERMINATE your care with me immediately. You will have to seek care elsewhere.

Regards

Mark Lesk MD


Sent from my iPhone


____________


The pharmacy and the local CLSC are 2 of some very few last institutions with a human approach and friendly relationship with patients, and I did not want to destroy this good relationships: a product of years of the mutual trust. An only issue with that pharmacy is that, in the past, they insisted (from time to time) that a doctor should contact them for medications' renewals, not visa versa. I have no idea what is a problem for them, but it was uneasy for me to demand the pharmacy to contact Dr. Lesk, especially when he was guilty for not administrating an appointment and not renewing the prescription in time. It was definitely his duty and obligation.


However, Dr. Lesk imprudently refused to contact the pharmacy, claiming that the responsibility to renew the medication is mine. (My friend has contacted for me the Info-Sante line, and they told him that the renewal of medications is not patient's, but doctor's (and pharmacy's) responsibility).


Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2021 13:30:07 -0400 [01:30:07 PM EDT]

From: Mark Lesk Canada

To: leog@total.net

Subject: Re: prescription

Please Ask them to fax me a request to renew.

The responsibility for that is yours.

And if you feel that your physician is irresponsible or unethical (as

possibly implied in your emails) then it is your responsibility to find

another doctor. It would be my responsibility to send a copy of your chart

to them if requested, and it would be my pleasure to do so.

The Association of Ophthalmologists of Quebec can furnish you with a list

of all ophthalmologists in Quebec if you are so inclined.


On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 11:16 AM wrote:


[Hide Quoted Text]


Isn't it your obligation to be sure that

the IOP-controlling prescription for

a glaucoma patient MUST be renewed

in time, Dr. Lesk? Whose responsibility

it that: Doctor's or patient's?


Why you can not renew the prescription

without the pharmacy's request (as I am

not in a positiopn to tell the pharmacy

what to do)?


(.....)


____


In my next email, I contested Dr. Lesk's claim that the responsibility to renew the medication is patient's (not doctors), especially under the current situation, when he did not administrate an appointment and did not secure a renewal even when the eye-drops have been expired.


However, Dr. Lesk did not call the pharmacy, did not renew the prescription, and left me without the eye-drops, which are essential for me. He perfectly knows that I was left with a single mean to control the intraocular pressure (IOP), which is the prescription of the eye-drops, and without the eye-drops the IOP will inevitably rise about the limits and will destroy my vision completely, and I will become blind.


I believe that he perfectly comprehended - WHAT action he committed by refusing me the prescription.


However, even with all unethical and weird things that Dr. Lesk done, he was the less unethical ophthalmologist among others with whom I dealt, in exception of Dr. Waldron, Dr. Saheb, and Dr. Noor Alotaibi - 3 doctors, whose ethical approach was undisputable. Dr. Lesk did no active damage to my eyes. He did no mechanical or medication harm; he also prescribed additional eye-drops, which helped to (more or less) secure the most dangerous jumps of IOP.


My next suggestion about Dr. Lesk's actions can sound odd, but what if he just could not continue with me because of the conflicts of interests and of the pressure on him from his environment? In the beginning, when he was acting as a completely ethical doctor, he did not know who I am, and was not approached yet by someone, who was later provoking him on immoral actions ([see above]).


It is possible that the same applies to Dr. Gans, an ophthalmologist, who saved my eyes, but, simultaneously, irreversibly destroyed my vision.


What is the most amazingly bizarre about my ophthalmological drama: is that I was always referred to doctors-ophthalmologists of the same St.-Mary's hospital, even when I addressed (for the reference) to optometrists and doctors outside of St.-Mary's affiliations, and that ALL St.-Mary"s ophthalmologists, who assessed or HAD to assess me before the close-angles syndrome, have contributed to my vision decline's drama.


Dr. Chirgwin German, Dr. John Patrick Rowen, Dr. Girair Basmadjian, Dr. Pierre Brais (who, during his earlier career, worked in association with St.-Mary's hospital), Dr. John Robert Lewis (and St.-Mary"s ER), Dr. Jean Deschênes, Dr. Chan (who also cooperated with St.-Mary's Hospital), Dr. Nguyen: all of them are on the list of St.-Mary's doctors, and all of them had one or another link to the sabotage of an ophthalmologic care for me. Was it surprising that the very first ophthalmologist, Dr. Gans, who, finally, took care of my eyes and destroyed my vision - also was St.-Mary's doctor?


When I was abandoned by Dr. Lesk, and could not find another ophthalmologist, and was rejected by Dr. Nguyen (who actually sabotaged the ophthalmological care for me), I was referred to Dr. Marino Discerpola, St.-Mary's ophthalmologist as well, who (when I could not pay for his ophthalmological services) referred me to Dr. F. Zaguia, another St.-Mary's ophthalmologist, an appointment with whom was for a long time sabotaged by St.-Mary's hospital (regarding its urgency).


When Dr. F. Zaguia, finally, examined me at St.-Mary's eye clinic, she refused to accept me as her patient.


From the medical point of view, St.-Mary's Hospital is a very good hospital, but, situating just 2 blocks from the giant Jewish General Hospital, it connected to the latter by innumerous links and influences, and (as it appears) used by some political and ideological forces for crashing dissidents, marginalized people, representatives of some social and ethnic minorities, and some of other categories of citizens.


On 6 August 2021, I supposed to see another ophthalmologist, to whom I was referred by my family doctor. However, when I came at the designated time, the office was closed, and nobody was there.


Since May 2021, this was the 3-rd time, when I was told a wrong time, or my appointment was registered wrongly. When I contacted Dr. Discerpola's office on 12 July 2021, I was told by a young female secretary that I could have an appointment on August 6, at 5 p.m. (17:00). I registered this conversation, which was later listened by my wife and my younger daughter. They both heard the same time: 17:00.


However, because I was not sure that I have the right address, I tried to contact Doctor's bureau 2 times, left a message, but was never called back. By then, my daughter expressed her concerns about the time of the appointment, as the office works only till 16:00. On 5 August 2021 (at 14:36) I received a call from Dr. Discerpola's office. This time, an older secretary spoke to me, to remind me that I have an appointment 2 days later, on 6 Aug. 2021, but she did not mention the time, or pronounced it so quickly that I was not able to catch it. She spoke with an irritated tone, almost in a hostile manner, but I tried to speak to her as polite as I could, and said that I need to verify the address and the time of the appointment. She calmed down and patiently dictated the address to me, but disconnected without confirming the time of the appointment. Having still no confirmation of the appointment's time, I called back, but there was no response.


Next day, my wife called the phone 514-385-05-30 innumerous times, and twice left a message (that she needs today's appointment's time confirmation), but nobody called back. (Later, when I, finally, visited Dr. Discerpola, I saw that the secretary does not has even a single free second to answer most of the incoming calls - due to an incredible flow of patients). When we came by Metro around 16:00, the office was already closed. We waited another 40 minutes, but no one came in. The outside temperature was 30 degrees Celsius, and such a long voyage at such a hot day was a threat to my eyes and contraindicated because of other health issues, and, still, I (with my wife, who accompanied me) - we were just wasting our time and spending money for transportation in vain.


In a similar way, my appointment for an ultrasound was almost sabotaged on 20 July 2021. I was told on the phone that my appointment is on 20 Jul. 2021, at 10:15. My wife listened to the recording, and also heard: 10:15. However, when I came and showed my RAMQ card, 2 female secretaries said that there is no any appointment for me on 20 July 2021. I started to argue with them, insisting that I HAVE an appointment, that I recorded the conversation with the secretary, and that there was told clearly: 20 July 2021, at 10:15. They replied that, probably, I made an appointment not to their bureau, but at "another place". I challenged it, insisting that I am sure that I have an appointment at this particular location.


They said that it cannot be so, and advised me to go home. But I still insisted on my today"s appointment, saying that I called one of 2 phone numbers indicated on the requisition paper, and received the appointment date and time while speaking with this telephone number. The second secretary, who was sitting (another one was standing), has started to call somewhere, to verify if my appointment was booked with "them". At this moment, I turned away, approaching the elevators to leave the radiology, but the secretaries called me, and I went back to the desk. The one that was standing, was pointed to her colleague and to a journal with her finger, saying that my appointment was there indeed, but was registered in a weird way. However, they said that my appointment is not at 10 a.m., but at 5:00 p.m. Now, no argument (that 1) it was not mine, but their error; 2) I already spent money to come there; 3) for a fasting patient, an appointment time is supposed to be in the morning; 4) I am already fasting since yesterday, and they have no rights to extend it for another day, while it is contraindicated due to my health issues; and 5) if even it would be my mistake, they had to find me a niche in the morning due to their moral, humanitarian, ethical, and situational obligations) helped: I was sent home without an ultrasound.


When I came at 17:00, I waited 1 hour and 20 minutes, in spite of my demand to accelerate my ultrasound test, because I already came in the morning, and I am fasting 2 days. Coming home, I listened to the recording again, and discovered that the secretary announced 2 contradictive appointment times: ones she said that the appointment is at 10, then that the appointment is at 17:00. My wife also heard the recording, and confirmed that the secretary just made a mistake. When I obtained the ultrasound report, it was indicated that I past the test at 17:15; it was not true, because I came at 17:00, and was called for the test around 18:25. This represented just another sample of medical institutions" arbitrariness: they do what they want, they randomly change the date, the time, the data, and there is no supervision and no mechanisms to protect patients" rights.


Another ordeal was prepared for me to sabotage the blood-urine test.


When I called CLSC on 2 April 2021, I was told that my appointment is on May 1, 2021, at 18:00. Having suspicions about the date and time, I called the CLSC again on 15 Apr. 2021, and was told that no appointment was registered under my name, and that I have to book another appointment. My protests were not taken into consideration, and I received another date, 10 May 2021, and time, 10:00. People whom I know told me that they never (during the pandemic, because till spring 2019 the appointment was booked 1-2 days in advance in CLSC, and, concerning hospitals, you could just walk in) waited for a laboratory test as long as a month. Everyone was given an appointment within a week or two maximal.


Here is what happened on 10 May 2021.


10 May 2021 - 10.00 - blood-urine-test at CLSC rue Centre, Tel. (514) 937-9251.


On 10 May 2021, I had an appointment for the blood-urine test at Pointe St.-Charles CLSC at rue Centre.

Wearing a blue approved mask, I came exactly at 9:55, as was told on the phone (5 minutes in advance), and disinfected my hands at the entrance. However, seeing that I already did it, the black nurse demanded the hands cleaning ritual, which was like an insult. I did not argue, just complied.

She ordered me to sit down on a designated chair, and brought another (same as mine) mask, ordering me to replace my mask by that one. Her mask was not in a box, not even in a plastic cover. She was holding a jammed mask without any cover; obviously not sterile.

I replied that I have no confidence in her mask - and do not want to be infected by it. But she insisted, threatening to block me from entering the blood test room.

I responded that, if so, I am leaving, and demanded my requisition back. This woman was about to change her mind, but consulted her chef, a low white person, who limped a little. I immediately recognized him. Several years ago, once he already manifested an inhuman approach.

He was insisting that I absolutely must change the mask, and even raised his voice, speaking with me in such a bureaucratic style as if I was not a human being.

I told that, after putting this brand new sterile mask on, I came directly from home, from door to door, without any contacts at home or in the street, without touching or lowering the mask, and, thus, the mask, which I am wearing, cannot be contaminated: no way.

However, he was unshakable.

I said that I am leaving, and demanded the requisition back.

He did not return the paper, but disappeared in a door near the entrance.

The nurse did not allow me to continue sitting, and expelled me to the space near the entrance, which looked like a punishment.

I had no idea how long I waited, but, obviously, more than 5 or 10 minutes.

Then the man has appeared again from the back door [probably, he called somewhere about me], returning the paper and sending me away.

Thus, I was denied a test, which absence (regarding my health issues) could lead to any unpredictable consequences. (And this, indeed, as later came out, caused complications to my health).

I want to stress that they did not demand to change the mask from the person, who came after me; at least, not in my presence. When my wife has passed a blood test in the same CLSC, she also entered in her own mask to the procedure, and no one demanded that she had to change the mask.

I believe that it could be an act of a pre-planned sabotage, or an act of racism.

On my way home, I had a tachycardia and heart pain, and could experience a heart attack or a stroke because of the humiliation of 3 bureaucrats and formalists, and would like to know, whom the man from the CLSC contacted asking what to do with me (when he disappeared in the back door).

I do not believe in any scientific base for the policy to change the masks when entering the medical institutions. On the contrary, I believe that this policy is helping the virus to spread. At the different stages of the pandemic, the medical institutions were becoming the major spots of the covid bubble, and the policy of wearing a hospital-provided mask could contribute to the pandemic. It is very possibly that not the sanitary considerations, but a desire to expose people to the surveillance cameras is behind this policy, and the paranoiac obsession of surveillance is putting people at risk.


________________________


17 Jun 2021 - 10:20 - a call from CLSC Pointe St.-Charles about the blood test that was refused on 10 May 2021.


The caller insisted that the policy of changing the mask in the medical institutions and accepting the masks provided by them is scientifically-based and necessary, but could not prove it.

When he said - that, allegedly, this is needed because patients can wear reutilized masks, - I argued that nobody cancelled the presumption of innocence, and that the medics can just ask patients about it.


I said that, in my opinion, there is no scientific basis under this policy, which, on the opposite, contributed to the spread of the virus.


There are no more contagious (contaminated) sites during an epidemic or pandemic than the hospitals, and the risks to be infected through hospital-provided masks are much higher than other possibilities. The main (hidden) reason of the mask changing policy, I added, is to flash patients" faces for the surveillance cameras.


I also said that the mask, provided to me by the nurse on 10 May 2021, was not in a box, not in a plastic cover, but without anything, and looked not new and not "propre".


However, in response, the caller has twisted my words, claiming that "this is not true, we never provide dirty masks", while I did not pronounce the word "dirty" (sale). Such illegal, deceptive methods indicate the degree of his unethical ideology.


I emphasized that on the 10-th of May I was wearing exactly the same type of mask as the one that was offered to me at CLSC at rue Centre, and said to the nurse and her chef that (after sterilizing my hands) I put on a brand new mask at home, and came straight here, from door to door, meeting no one on my way and not touching the mask.


He stressed then that - if I would go to a hospital - I would be forced to change the mask: the same as in CLSC.


In response, I said that I visited hospitals 3 or 4 times (in reality: dozens of times) during the worse periods of the pandemics, and was never forced to change the mask (which indicates that many compassionate, empathically relevant people still work in the medical system).


Whatever the regulations are - I stressed - you must remain human.


Even the CLSC nurse, who wanted to give me the mask, which was not in its original cover (and, therefore, not sterile) and looked crumpted, was ready to change her mind, but her chef has intervened - and blocked my way.


I stated that the refusal of the blood test maybe already caused a significant damage to my health, and now (almost a month and a half since the incident) it became an urgency.


I said, OK, if I'll agree to change the mask, but only for my own one from the original untouched box and in its original plastic cover, and would change it before your eyes, will you give me the appointment?


He said "no" with a palpable anger, and disconnected...


______________


On August, 9, I sent a fax to Dr. Discerpola"s office:


To the office of Dr. Discerpola, ophthalmologist;

Tel. (514) 385-05-30 ; Fax: 514-385-3039.

1240, av. Beaumont, Suite 110,

Mont-Royal, QC, H3P 3E5.

From Lev Gunin: Tel. 514-499-1294.


On 6 August 2021, I supposed to see Dr. Discerpola, to whom I was referred by my family doctor. However, when I came at the designated time, the office was closed, and nobody was there.

Since May 2021, this was the 4-th incident, when I was given a wrong time, or my appointment was registered wrongly. This could not happen accidently, so, consequently, I am not tempted to accuse anyone, including the secretary (for such a mistake): something really weird is going on, which is hard to explain.

When I contacted Dr. Discerpola's office on 12 July 2021, a young female secretary told me that my appointment is on August 6, at 5 p.m. (17:00). I registered this conversation, which was later listened by my wife and my younger daughter. They both heard the same time: 17:00.

Being not sure about the address, I contacted your bureau 2 times, left a message, but was never called back. By then, my daughter expressed her concerns about the time of the appointment, as your telephone message says that the office works till 16:00.

On 5 August 2021 (14:36), I received a call from Dr. Discerpola"s office. This time, an older secretary spoke to me, to remind that I have an appointment on 6 Aug. 2021. She did not mention the time, or pronounced it too quickly. She spoke with an irritation (maybe, she was in a rush), but, trying to speak to her as polite as I could, I said that I need to verify the address and the time of the appointment. She calmed down and patiently dictated the address, but disconnected without confirming the time. Having still no confirmation of the appointment"s time, I called back, but there was no response.

Next day, my wife called the phone 514-385-05-30 innumerous times, and left a message (that she needs today"s appointment"s time confirmation) twice, but nobody called back.

When we came by Metro around 16:00, the office was already closed. We waited 40 minutes, but no one came in. The outside temperature was 30 degrees Celsius, and such a long voyage at such a hot day was a threat to my eyes and my health in general, and, still, I (with my wife, who accompanied me) - we were just wasting our time and spending money for transportation in vain.

Meanwhile, the time is running out, because I am not only abandoned by the current ophthalmologist; he is also stubbornly refusing to renew 2 IOP-controlling eye-drops prescription, and without the eye-drops I may become blind very soon. Eventually, since 2017-s iridothomy (which provoked cataract), I supposed to have 2 eye-surgeries to restore drainage system and lower IOP, because even with the eye-drops the pressure jumps sometimes to 24 and 29. The prescription is expired, and I am in a limbo, having an instable IOP and other innumerous issues.

Regards, Lev Gunin. 9 Aug. 2021, Monday.


P.S. I can play the appointment booking conversation recording on the phone on demand. You can also verify my multiple phone calls that have to be registered by your telephone devices.


...................................


25 August 2021, I, finally, got an appointment with Dr. Marino Discerpola at 12:15, and could see the doctor.


Doctor Discerpola did not answer even a single of my questions, only said that the IOP was 18 and 18 (same indicators are suspicious by few reasons), and that the cataract is VERY mild. He put myoptics in my eyes without telling me that he is going to do this and to perform a retinal exam (before, I told his assistant that the myopic are contraindicated for me) and without my knowledge and consent.

He actually did not perform the retinal exam, only pretended that he's doing it. Why he did so is a mystery. If he was curious after my fax, he could access my file and to learn that myoptics are contraindicated for me, and should be considered ONLY in an emergency situation (like retinal detachment).

Plus, he did not warn me (as he MUST warn a patient) that after the myoptics I should not drive a car and someone has to accompany me. I had again long complications and I am not sure that my eyes have been fully recovered. The retinal exam should be reserved in my case exclusively for an emergency.

I could not become patient of Dr. Discerpola because all the services by him are payable, and because a doctor, who does not answer patient's questions, is not for me.

Practically, it is difficult for him to act differently, because he has a flooding of patients, a real disaster. Maybe, this is not Dr. Discerpola's fault, but, quite the opposite: a sign of his altruism and compassion (a sign that he is trying to help so many patients in such a desperate health-care crisis situation), but it does not work for me in my personal situation.

Finding that I can not pay for other medical procedures, Dr. Discerpola has referred me to Dr. F. Zaguia, and sent a fax to her, and this characterize him as a responsible and companionate person. However, I did not hear anything from Dr. Zaguia even in September 2021, when I was not able even to read books and to look to a computer screen.


In May - August, 2021, I was experiencing a number of deteriorations and improvements in my glaucoma and cataract development. While the visual field was degrading (according to a number of my self-tests, and to my impression from the test for the appointment with Dr. Nguyen), the cataract has retreated, and the dysphotopsia partially disappeared. (I realize that the cataract is considered non-curable without a surgery, but I ignore it and describe my absolutely objective observation. Besides, even in 2017, soon after the iridothomy, the cataract was recognized as "moderate", and now Dr. Discerpola said it is very light).


However, after the myoptics that Dr. Discerpola put in my eyes, my vision has temporarily drastically worsened. Right after this procedure, I felt pain and burning in my right eye's right corner. The blurry vision and "blue glass" in eyes proximal corners have gone earlier than after the previous similar procedures, but the half-transparent cloudy spots and other signs of cataract, as well as different manifestation of very severe disphotopsia have returned and became even as grave as never before.


I also called the office of Dr. Conrad Kavalec (Clinique des yeux, Pavillon Hayes, 3e étage Numéro de téléphone principal: 514-345-3511, poste 3644, Fax: 514-734-2711), but was not allowed to have an appointment.


Two other ophthalmologists also kicked me out, and, thus, I was left with only one option: to do everything for obtaining an appointment with Dr. Lesk again.


Maybe, I am wrongly seeing medical workers' duty as an obligation to prevent or to ease human suffering, and not to allow their patients to die or to become disabled? Maybe, I am naively looking for something that I call "medical justice", when - in the real world - the modern doctors provide real medical help only when it is too late or too complicated, and causing excessive suffering? Maybe, their actual duty is to block medical help for ordinary people and not to allow any equality, because if the less privileged could get real health care, then the super rich and super powerful will lose their pleasure of feeling the superiority, choosiness, and domination?


However, watching the situation, I see that the modern doctors are unhappy individuals. Only few of them are settled well. The vast majority of the private medical offices' owners have fallen in dependency of the appointment booking system providers; marketers; accountants; insurance agents; and lawyers; telephone companies; equipment providers; etc.; or became slaves and hostages of the foreign companies (mostly Israeli and American), or of their uninvited "partners" and "associates" (like the same digital (medical imaging and data, and so on) and network-Web companies or governmental agencies). Doctors, who are working in the hospitals, became enslaved by their employers, facing overcrowded (like East-European rail stations in 1970-s) waiting rooms, overflow of patients, working overtime, burning out, and living in a permanent psychological stress.


But who did it to them? The governments? Not really. No, they did it by their own hands, by sabotaging the public health care, or by making a compromise with conscience to satisfy boundless appetites of the government officials, or by complying with the inhuman practices, or by following their own limitless greed, or by their own inhuman and unethical behavior.


When they become sick, they face the same incompetence, fieriness and impatience, haste, negligence and neglect, indifference and non-compassion of their colleagues and the System.


But it is too late to regret of what they done, as it is too late for so many of their patients...


12 Aug. 2022, Friday

Having no other ophthalmologist, I had to stay with Dr. Lesk, as there were no other options.

With incredible difficulties, but, finally, I received an appointment with him.

This time, the clinic separated the preparation exams (like IOP measuring) from doctor's assessment. Today (12-8-2022), I came for 8:15 appointment, just to see that Dr. Lesk will not examine me today, but on 18 Aug. 2022.


18 Aug. 2022, Thursday

With the appointment, scheduled for 9:40, I spent - in the eye clinic - around 6 hours, much less than usually: because the IOP measurement, and other procedures were performed on 12 Aug. 2022.

Dr. Lesk (the ophthalmologist) attempted, but could not fully hide his surprise, when admitted a considerable improvement in my vision clarity and quality, in spite of still raging blepharitis.

I could see almost the smallest letters on the wall, appropriate for a normal healthy vision. IOP - 14 both eyes (at 12:17) - which is excellent. The visual field - is better. The optical nerve photo scan conclusion: stable.

This significant improvement has started almost 3 months ago, and (running forward) lasted till December 2022 (totally, 6 months), when, after being refused the Azarga drops in the pharmacy (due to a drastic shortage of medications in the whole Canada) in November, and after 1 months of using Cosopt instead, I started to notice a gradual worsening of my vision. However, there were no glaucoma attacks since April or May 2022; a stable IOP (14 or 15-16 in both eyes) was registered by Dr. Lesk (August 2022) and by an optometrist (November 2022). I feel no pressure in the eyes when doing physical efforts; or when put down the head. No eyes pain, no eye-related headaches, no vision doubling, no other (previously described vision disturbing symptoms) as far.

I can see now clearly more small elements in the distance than even in 2016, and I can read a book without the eyeglasses for 15-20 min., before the vision becomes blurry.

It is a clear evidence that my vision would gradually improve and would come to the norm (with an appropriate conservative treatment) in 2-3 years, and that the angles would gradually open without the laser iridothomy, which just destroyed my vision!

Thus, the real substantial (long!) improvement refutes Dr. Brais, Dr. Gans, and Dr. Lesk's claims that my vision degradation, glaucoma and cataract - is an aging-related problem. It also contests Dr. Lesk's and 3 other ophthalmologists' claims that my vision was (in some periods of time) gradually, or - sometimes - catastrophically degrading mostly due to the cataract (and, consequently, indirectly, because of the aging), and not because the iridothomy, hectically done by Dr. Gans, who provoked the optical nerve damage, the cataract, and very serious disphotopsia.

I'll not speculate about Dr. Gans's motives behind the urgently performed by him laser iridothomy, while he refused an adequate emergency conservative treatment of high IOP, but, certainly, his rash to employ the iridothomy had nothing to do with a medical necessity or advisability. He ignored my request for a full-scale conservative treatment at first, and also refused to perform an optical nerve scanning by the medical imaging technology.

This long-lasted self-improvement 5 year after the beginning of the drastic vision crises in 2017 (close angles syndrome; high IOP; etc.) is the proof that I never had an aging-related cataract, but acquired the cataract as a secondary effect (complication) from the iridothomy in 2017.

If I had an age-related (not traumatic) cataract: in this case the cataract would inevitable progress very quickly, and I would not be able to see already 3-4 years ago without a cataract surgery. It means that the iridothomy did more harm than good.


9 Nov. 2022

The pharmacy did not give me the monthly renewal of Azarga drops.

My wife, and me - we spoke to 3 pharmacy's employers, and they told us that the pharmacy has no Azarga at the moment, and that they will receive it only in 1.5 weeks.

My explanation that I critically depend from this eye-drops; that, even WITH ALL the eye-drops, I am suffering from frequent glaucoma attacks; and that WITHOUT the eye-drops I risk to lose completely my vision - did not change their attitude.

I take my monthly renewal of medications always at the same date, so, it is even more astonishing that the pharmacy did not prepare Azarga at the fixed date.

They could, at least, to warn me in advance, to give me time for actions.

I know about a critical shortage of medications in Canada, but even in this situation responsible people have to act differently.

The fact that this incident with Azarga coincides with the infection is an indirect evidence that I was deliberately infected, and also that a new round of persecutions by the government started again.


Running forward: after one month of using not the right eye-drops (which inflicted a number of side effects), I was experiencing another crisis with my vision, which started to degrade again...


+++++++++++++


Lev Gunin


THE PUNITIVE HEALTH CARE

[HEALTH CARE AS A REPRESSIVE TOOL]


BOOK 4-1


THE MISTREATMENT OF MY INJURIES. PART 1. [2005-2014]


BOOK 4 - PART 1.


THE CONTENT.


CHAPTER 1

CHAPTER 2

CHAPTER 3

CHAPTER 4

CHAPTER 5

CHAPTER 6

CHAPTER 7

CHAPTER 8

CHAPTER 9

CHAPTER 10

CHAPTER 11


* * *

The whole text of the chronological events and medical documents (under the name of "The Punitive Health Care - (Health Care as a Repressive Tool)" is available for examination only on the basis of the following contract between the author and the reader:


I (THE READER) GIVE MY CONSENT THAT, BY CLICKING CORRESPONDING LINKS AND ACCESSING THE TEXT OF "THE PUNITIVE HEALTH CARE", I AUTOMATICALLY AGREE TO THE FOLLOWING PRELIMINARY CONDITIONS [FOR READING]:


-- I am (at least) 18 years old.


1. I (the reader) is undertaking (commit myself) not to distribute the text of "The Punitive Health Care - (Health Care as a Repressive Tool)" - entirely, or in fragments; not to copy medical documents; and not to share the text and images without author' permission.


2. I (the reader) understand that the confidential information, which is contained in this text, cannot be used for any other [than the reading (extraneous; secondary)] purposes and needs, for any researches, essays, stories, etc.


3. I (the reader) commit myself not to sneer at open ticklish personal information (which sharing was induced by circumstances), not to savor any medical, physiological, or anatomic details, and not to use this text as a reason for mockery and persecution.


4. I (the reader) am warned by the author that, except for a number of obviously immoral (by definition) doctors' and medical staff's actions, other decisions and acts described in this "confession" are not subjected to hasty moral assessment because a) only experts can judge finally about their justification and fairness; b) explanations and vindications of other party are necessary. We also do not know to what degree the doctors were under an influence and direct power of police, Ministry of Immigration, and other enforcement agencies, political organizations, groups and persons - with their own ideological, economic, and propaganda interests, - and to what degree this influence impacted on their diagnostic conclusions and assessments of patient's state of health. Many of the documentary confirmed facts incontestably demonstrate that author's ideological stand (who's opposing to younger generation's transformation into zombie-biorobots with mobile phones on shoulders instead of heads; to electronic totalitarianism with its prison-like total video surveillance; and to the tyrannical political censorship) played nearly a major role in enraging the authorities and triggering the persecutions.


5. I (the reader) am warned that the author sees the main cause of the most dramatic (for him) events in the fact that the enforcement agencies and interested persons and groups managed to present him to the medical community as an individual incapable to evaluate his health condition objectively; as a health-consciousan (or hypochondriac); an extremist; a troublemaker; an individual obsessed with panic and alarm patterns; as a person, who is making unreal demands to the system of medical care - concerning his - allegedly - pseudo-maladies and exaggerated gravity of trivial indispositions. This smear campaign of defamation, scurrilous libel, and wicked calumny made impossible receiving an adequate medical care (and sometimes any medical help at all), and led to health undermining, numerous diseases, incidents, and unnecessary sufferings. Doctors also considered difficult to believe in continuous (not connected with each other) illnesses, with an interval of 4-7 days, sometimes rolling at the same time: as tsunami. They refused to believe in these sequences of illnesses' painful course, danger, and significance. This chronicle disproves such a prejudiced opinion, producing an incontestable evidence.


6. I (the reader) am informed that all negative remarks, characteristics, and facts' assessments belong only to the portrayal of criminal groups, extremists, and carriers of anti-humanistic, racist, and totalitarian ideology, but do not contain groundless generalizations and negative assessment of any country, ethnic group, or religion. The author is categorically against dismantling of any of the existing states, and against restrictions of the rights of religious congregations of any faith.


7. I (the reader) am informed that this edition partially presents the previous 2017 edition without any changes, and, thus, may not correspond to later view and opinions.


8. I (the English reader) am informed that some parts of the following English text of "The Punitive Health Care" - were translated from Polish, Russian, or French originals, and may contain primitive language, double interpretation, or puzzled meaning. Such confusing fragments should be compared with their originals in Polish and Russian languages (author's native languages) [2016-2017]; all controversial points must be resolved through such a comparison.


9. In the very last moment of this edition's make-up (April 2023), the author came across a description of so-called Havana-syndrome, and found same symptoms and complications, which he experienced when was attacked by an unknown remote weapon (3 Nov. 2005, 7 Jan. 2013, and 21 June 2016), and developed symptoms of post-microwave irradiation.


_________


CHAPTER 1.


When, despite of intrigues of the foreign governments and Canadian Federal Immigration, our Immigration Drama was close to its solution, several acts of sabotage have been already occurred, which goal was to destroy my health, and consequences were already present. Not only an acute urological infection (which was "promised" by Immigration officials and by one - affiliated with Immigration - doctor) under very suspicious circumstances, or attacks by "unknown hooligans", but a whole series of terrorist acts were destroying my physical body.


And then the "second act" of sabotage used to be implemented, when, after an injury, or on a peak of an acute infection, I was denied antibiotics, ANY medical assistance, and even any advice or recommendation in the medical institutions.


Such an act of sabotage happened at Van Horn, where Dr. Zast and several other doctors worked in a miniature local policlinic on a loft, in degrading - for doctors and their patients - conditions. The very existence - in this Van Horn's area, inhabited by low-income marginalized immigrants - of such a policlinic with the conditions below the norms of the poorest underdeveloped countries, tells more about the double standards' deceptive nature of Canadian political-corporate elite and its deceptive "health care" more than anything else.


Due to an untreated urological infection (I was denied antibiotics, and this triggered the whole series of deadly complications), cysts began to develop on top of my old and new scars. One of them has formed on my forehead.


At my request, at the beginning of 2000-s (probably, before 2003), Dr. Zast referred me to a surgeon, who was weekly (1-2 times a week) examining patients in the same policlinic.


I said that I have a cyst on my forehead (around an old scar - where it formed), with an extensive infiltrate. I demanded 2 small surgeries for preventing an eventual calcification, which goal would be to ensure the drainage of furunculosis and infiltrate, and removing the cyst (2-nd stage). The surgeon laughed, and asked, if I really want a scar that will disfigure my forehead? I responded, with a similar smile that scars "decorate a man", and continued demanding the surgery.


Then this moral freak just kicked me out, having said that he does not see any need in such a surgery.


When my demands were ignored at Van Horn clinic, I turned to doctor Pushie in the same case, and to another female doctor (of oriental origin), who was practicing (if my memory is precise) by then at the same "outpatient clinic" at Royal Victoria Hospital.


This time I was even more persistent in demanding the surgery (certainly, first of all, I demanded a referral to a surgeon). Doctor Pushi told me to come after tomorrow (probably for consultation with a surgeon), but - when I came, instead of her, I saw another - very young - female doctor, who said that I am nervous, that I have an anxiety, and that - therefore - I, allegedly, "exaggerate the problem", and refused me a referral to a surgeon.


But someone from the doctors of the same policlinic (probably, the same female of oriental origin) nevertheless referred me to a surgeon, in the same place, at Royal Victoria Hospital"s outpatient clinic, and THIS surgeon, having examined my forehead, refused the surgery, too.


When the calcification already started, I tried to get an urgent appointment with any doctor (at Royal Victoria's Outpatients clinic) from the secretaries, but they also behaved cruelly and humiliatingly (one of them said that she "sees nothing"; another one said that my problem is "not life-threatening", and does not need any urgency).


Thus, it wasn't an isolated exceptional incident, but a particular government's system of systemic and systematic discrimination, unusual cruelty, and denial of essential medical assistance.


All this continued 3-4 years. And, finally, when I got to a surgeon again, the infiltrate already calcified, and it was already too late to perform a surgery. A bone growth has formed on my forehead, which forever disfigured my face worse than any cuts or scars could (see 2 photos of 2017 below):


Usually I try to lower my hairs to hide this very noticeable defect. But this damage (in this case: a conscious harm to a patient) - was caused by several doctors, who perfectly realized the consequences for their patient. This outraged example once again proves the tradition of mutual responsibility of physicians and an absence of any protection of patients in Canada.


It is impossible to explain not just dozens, but uncountable accidents, which happened to me since 2006 [or, more precisely, since 2005]. Some of them caused light; some of them caused quite serious injuries.


The start of this inexplicable wave of accidents for almost 15 years coincided with relocation, when we moved from Aylmer Street (near McGill university musical campus) to another area. In 2003 - 2005 the landlords were furiously offending us trying to evict us or to force us to move. (See the detailed and documented description: BOOK 2, CHAPTER 5).


I suspected that the authorities stood behind this fierceness campaign, because wanted to cut my influence on student environment in McGill Ghetto area. The housing board (Régie de logement) while preventing the eviction, failed to protect us from illegal, criminal aggressive actions of the landlords. Finally, by creating the unbearable conditions, destroying our belongings and property, and by other criminal methods they forced us to leave, and, in the same time, the authorities offered us the municipal housing apartment (which was, as I think, coordinated with the landlords" offence).


This also coincided with the start of the police intimidation campaign: in 2006 - 2015 I was stopped, interrogated, or escorted, or approached, or confronted, etc. by police more then 100 times.


And - altogether - that coincided with the era of Harper"s regime government: 2006 - 2015.


Such a record number of accidents can not be explained by my state of health: till 2020 I did not have any physical defects (that could cause accidents), or dizziness, or something similar. It can not be explained by my psychological constitution or state of mind, because in my native Belarus, till my departure in 1991, and later (till my arrival to Montreal in 1994), and later (from 1994 to 2005-2006 (almost 10 years), I did not have any important accidents and injuries. The only injuries - that I had till 2006 - were inflicted by attackers and fierce hooligans.


In my childhood, bad boys pushed me from an icy hill, and I got a crack in my arm, and 1 month was wearing a cast (plaster).


In 1969 or 1970, a group of masked teenagers throw stones at me from an entrance to one court, but my reaction was so good that I avoided any grave injury. Why this happened and who they were: remained a mystery.


In the beginning of 1970-s, I was attacked in Mogilev (where I was a student at local music college) by 3 strangers (one of them was future dictator of Belarus, Alexander Lukashenko, who was a student at Mogilev Pedagogical Institute; years after I met Lukashenko several times in Kirovsk and in Myshkovichi; I never admitted that I recognized him). In result of this skirmish, I got a tendon"s injury, with the heel"s ligaments serious trauma.


In 1979, I was attacked by Arcady Kavalerchyk, who later left Belarus for the permanent residence in Israel. I won the duel (he was the boxing master and champion of the region in his weight), and did not take advantage when he fell to the ground, prompting a peaceful deal with him, but he artfully and meanly stroke a treacherous blow by a purposefully made like a brass knuckles ring, which caused the nose fracture and brain concussion. Kavalerchyk was a former prison guard, a military, who served at the Ministry of Internal Affairs, and an informer for KGB and police (militia).


At night, from December, 31, 1980 to 1 January, 1981, my brother and me: we were hunted down and attacked by a group of gangsters, whose purpose was to kill us, and just by miracle we avoided death. The pretext of this incident was artificially staged by Boris Kogan (or Cohen?), who later immigrated to Israel. Police (militia) refused to protect us, giving the bandits free hands for the manhunt. Next day (in the morning) my brother and me: we were oppressively interrogated by 2 men from KGB or police (militia), who interrogated us in their car - circulating around the city. Such an interrogation inside a civil car was the most strange and unusual phenomenon among enforcement agencies practices in 1970-1989 Belarus. My arm was injured. I suspected a hand of KGB in 1979 and 1980 events.


In 1985, 2 unknown young terrorists stubbed me in the back at one of the metro stations in Minsk"s newly constructed underground. For a long time, this wound did not heal, was infected, and provoked a lot of suffering. I am sure that KGB was behind this terrorist act.


During 3 and a half hardest years in a foreign land, after an actual deportation from my native Belarus, and before coming to Canada, I was brutally exploited by an employer, was pushed, and had another brain concussion. One day I was forcibly taken (with other people) to a stadium, where we were forced by police to work like slaves in an extremely harsh environment (and the heat of 40 degrees C), without water and food, and, at noon, two of the victims and me: we were taken to one of the policemen"s apartment, where they forced us to carry very heavy floor tiles-plates to the 3-rd floor without elevators. This event seriously affected my health.


Then, in Montreal, from 1994 to 2006 (2005), I did not have any injuries, except of small micro-cuts, which gets every person.


In the beginning of 1970-s, I was attacked in Mogilev (where I was a student at local music college) by 3 strangers (one of them was future dictator of Belarus, Alexander Lukashenko, who was a student at Mogilev Pedagogical Institute; years after I met Lukashenko several times in Kirovsk and in Myshkovichi; I never admitted that I recognized him). In result of this skirmish, I got a tendon"s injury, with the heel"s ligaments serious trauma.


In the 1990-s, already in Montreal, my family doctor was Immigration MD Dr. Brzezinska. I spoke with her in Polish, one of my native languages, and she manifested a friendly attitude to me and my mother. However, in the end of 1990-s, when she already committed serious crimes, being in conspiracy with the Immigration authorities, she abruptly changed her treatnebt. One of the evident examples of Dr. Brzezinska"s shift from a friendly doctor to an enemy was how she reacted to my problems with the frequent sprains.


Having frequent ligaments" strains since described about incident in 1970-s, I addressed to my family doctor several times, and, for this problem, Dr. Brzezinska used to prescribe anti-inflammatory medications and applications, and gave me a list of recommendations and exercises" brochures, which helped to restore my functionality very quickly. However, when her attitude has changed, she sabotaged any medical help, resorting to brutal and cynical remarks. In this period, I once came to her with a very severe ligaments" injury. I was suffering from strong pains, which was so tormenting that I could not sleep; I could not walk for 2 months; every step became a torture. And Dr. Brzezinska, who used to prescribe anti-inflammatory and knew how to heal such an injury, said: nobody will do the ligaments surgery for me, as this is a very expensive procedure. And kicked me out.


In November, 2005, on my birthday, I was attacked by an unknown type of radiation (as I suggested already by then: by the microwave-emitting device), and had the first episode of an extreme inexplicable vertigo, and other symptoms of the exposure to microwave radiation.


Beside these events, I did not have any traumas during 1994-2006 period in Montreal.


In 2006, a cyst formed on top of the old stubbing wound (see above), which I got in the Minsk"s Metro, and I asked (innumerous times) the doctors to remove it, but they always refused. Dozens of times, furuncles and abscesses have arose on top of the same old wound with (now) the cyst, bringing a lot of suffering, but the medics sadistically were denying me an access to this cyst removal. The cyst"s appearance in this sign year (2006) is just another puzzling fact, because since 2006 a chain of multiple incidents and accidents started to produce multiple traumas.


The supposition that the accidents could be psychologically provoked by the further worsening of our socioeconomic situation, forcible departure from McGill ghetto area (which I loved), and separation from Mont-Royal Mountain (where I went up almost every day), and the beginning of police intimidation: does not cover such accidents that were related to strangers" attacks, or to the events when cars, bikes, or motorcycles hit me on the pavement.


Undeniable facts are telling that even some of the accidents (when I "accidently" fell down, or when something fell on me) could be (or definitely were) staged.


"Why most of the "accidental" accidents happened when I confessed to someone (in my emails, or in telephone conversations) that I restored my health, and that I am in an excellent psychological and physical form? Why most of the "accidental" accidents happened when I was at the peak of my creative activity, publishing (on my web sites, or through the Google Books, or other e-publishers) a record quantity of my creative works?"


My health failed suddenly on January 1, 2001 (see in further statements): probably, because of deeply traumatic reaction to the forged diagnosis "tuberculosis" by means of which the immigration authorities planned to strengthen administrative repressions, and to put me in the hospital of infectious diseases (as in the USSR the dissidents were hid in mental hospitals). These traumatic consequences have been strengthened further by those medical repressions to which the authorities have subjected my mother, and - thereby - provoked her stroke. All this was described (in more details) in the Books 1 and 2. Till the end of 2001 (and later - in more rare occasions) I used to receive a lot of death threats for "incorrect" views. The same authors, who tried to intimidate me, were also threatening that each my address to a doctor "can be the last".


The following blow to my health did the unmotivated wave attacks to which I was exposed approximately till 2013 and which were followed by the situations of attacks" "imitation" till the end of 2015. And, finally, my health was destroyed by the persecutions by police, because almost daily stopping and interrogations by police, hails from police cars, escorts, confrontation by police, and demonstrative surveillance over my every movement, illegal searches, and purposefully issuing of illegal penalties: this was a very serious task. And, when - with the injuries inflicted by the attackers, or by the set ups, or with other traumas - I used to come to Emergency Rooms, where was denied medical care: it was not a less destructive blow to my health.


I already described how Immigration officers and a doctor from Montreal Chest Institute have threatened me by an urological infection in the end of 2000, and how (under suspicious circumstances) this infection has "materialized" on 1 January 2001, and how it could be connected to the terrorists acts in America on 11 September 2001 (if they were an "inside job") and so called "war on terrorism" (an unleashed terror and tyranny). This infection was left untreated by the doctors; I was denied antibiotics, and my whole life was further destroyed.


On 8 September 2001 I miraculously twice avoided 2 accidents, which could seriously injure or even kill me. It is important that it happened on Saturday, and the knowledgeable people will understand me. 3 days later the terrorist acts, which made a global impact, took places. I remember that police targeted some of the conscious objectors (activists) in different countries; they were targeted by an administrative pressure, or by suspicious accidents days before these events (9-11).


On April or March"s afternoon - 2005 - I stood at a bus stop, at the corner of Park and Milton when a motorcycle rushed from Milton Street to the sidewalk, and hit me. I managed to grasp the motorcyclist, and both of us fell (I was on the top). He jumped on his feet and attacked me with his fists, but I jumped into the bus, having evaded from further troubles. Nearly a year (after that incident) my right shoulder ached a bit.


Somewhere closer to the end of 2004 when I still lived on Aylmer, near Sherbrook, I crossed once Milton Street when was "not mortally" hit by a car, which has stopped on the sign "'ARRÊTE". The car stood there, "dancing". The driver slightly shook his car: forward - back, forward - back, listening to loud music. Even the "small" blow of his car caused a strong bruise to the left ankle.


Shortly before moving from student's McGill-"Ghetto" to Pointe-St-Charles (the end of 2005), another car struck me at the same corner of Milton and Aylmer when I was going back home from the Dépanneur. This driver not only hit me, but also shouted at me, accusing of deliberate crossing the street at a slowed-down speed, playing on the nerves of the driver. I felt pain from a bruise more than 2 months.


The same driver was involved then in incidents 2006 and 2008 (see below).


There are no doubts that an astonishingly exact and masterly performed blow of a pedestrian by a car so that the bones would stay unbroken, needs a special experience and training. And, if 2 drivers during rather a short period of time showed such special skills on me, it cannot be "mere coincidence".


(It is a pity that an exact and detailed description of those 2 incidents did not remain, apparently, as a result of a loss of data due to computer viruses sent right after the attacks. This data loss produced some doubts about the dates and erased the information about 2 cars and drivers).


The same driver that hit me at the corner of Aylmer and Milton (see above), nearly killed me at the corner of Notre Dame and Da Lima streets (December 2006). I was compelled to avoid the car"s blow, fell on the sidewalk and got long time healing bruises. It happened (more precisely) when I was crossing the street on roller blades on green light (December 2006).


I did not remember the car"s plate number, but the face of the driver was accurately printed into my memory. I found 2 short entries in the diary about the incidents, since April, 2008, about "almost" accidents when I was crossing different streets on green light, and there was the same car involved.


On October 20, 2006, around midnight (or a bit later), coming back home (on bicycle) from Bord de Lac, I had to pass under the railway bridge, slightly before the Atwater tunnel and the Marche [Market] Atwater. At that very moment, a roaring train from above muffled all sounds. Bicycle paths there abruptly break down, and it is not so simple to brake instantly for the speed. There was a guy in all black, and (on my lane) - his huge black dog, standing right on my way at the bicycle path in the dark. I signaled a call, but because of the train roar the jingle sank in this noise. The dog definitely saw me and could catch a call, but the owner of the animal, this young Brut, ordered it not to move. It was surprising, how I managed to pass them - without having touched: literally on the edge of the plinth of a narrow tunnel; the same guy and his dog appeared later, too (in next months and years) provoking few similar situations, and once he tried to attack me with a bludgeon, and also unleashed his dog on me.


Since January, 2007, has started an even more intensive, persuasive and demonstrative surveillance and escorts by police (and related civil, STM, or security) cars, "agents on foot" and the Metro (subway) police (STM).


Demonstrative surveillance by STM police in buses and following busses STM cars happened daily. Such an "indicative", demonstrative surveillance has never happened from the moment of our rrival to Montreal.


Another incident happened when - in May, 2007 - I photographed the church on Courcelle Street, which later was set on fire, and, after it burned, the construction mafia built condos in this spot.


End of May, 2007. Oil was sprayed on a ramp on which I drive on bicycle paths along the canal. I fell down with the bicycle.


Middle of June, 2007: an administrative lady, in something like a form (blue shirt, black skirt), on black Volkswagen Quebec 065-MXE came into our yard via the narrow pass from the street, and went up to our balcony.


On Thursday, May 10-th (2007), a known to me police car without a siren ran into the sidewalk so that I was forced to make a wild jump to avoid a collision, and strongly stretched a tendon on the left foot. This incident opened by itself a number of incidents with falling, collisions and traumas when I was on rolling blades, on bicycle, or simply went on foot.


Between May 5 and 12, 2007: (police) car moved down on the sidewalk, and could kill me, if not my good reaction. On the same day, when I was coming back home on rolling blades from the other side of the canal, someone poured oil on my way, and I fell, having quite badly injured my hand. Perhaps, I could avoid a trauma, if not that the incident with the car after which the ligaments (the Achilles' tendon) were slightly injured.


In that day, earlier, 2 policemen called from the street, but did not come to my apartment.


In July, 2007, when I was about to cross the Cote-St.-Catherine Street from Lemieux on green light, and made already 1 step from the pavement to the pedestrian pass: a new expensive car jumped out on red on high speed, slapping on my shirt"s pocket by its mirror, and the driver, a female in her 30 +, scoffed at me, having maliciously pulling out from the window. If I stopped in 5 cm closer to the street center, she could break me easily in a flat cake.


At the end of September, 2007, I was attacked by two strangers whom I already met when went for a bicycle drive with Y. They stuck to us at the corner of Berri and St.-Antoin streets, and I gave a sign to my friend: a pier, we leave. He did not share my fears, and in a pointed manner refused to move further. Then I left myself towards the Old Port, and, having looked back, saw that those two (age: 30 plus) instantly lost any interest, and left, too. I did not say a words, did not made any contact with them. At the end of September, they attacked me near the old railway bridge, made of big stones, on Chemin Glen, having blocked me the way and having forced me to defend myself. It was a short, but harsh skirmish, and I was able miraculously to beat off. They looked as homeless.


Few days later the same two pursued me (ran on me) near Côte-des-Neiges and Sherbrook; I escaped from them into the bus. If I would not hurt my right hand and did not have a new slight trauma to the Achilles' tendon as a result of that skirmish, maybe, I would react more adequately, and could avoid consequences of one more serious incident several days later...


CHAPTER 2


2 OCTOBER 2007.


On October 2-nd, 2007 (Tuesday) I was hit by a new white car with the plate number (Quebec) 988-PPH - on my way home from my mother (Lemieux Street, near Côte Ste-Catherine). It happened around 21:10 (I had no watch on me), at the corner of Decarie and Ponsar (I was moving along Decarie, towards Sherbrook). [Unfortunately, I lost my note or did not remember the car"s brand. Most likely, it was a Japanese car: Acura, Hyundai, Toyota, or Mazda.] (In 2008-2009, I was busily followed by Toyota Yaris with the plate number 325 VXK Quebec that was driven by a person who looked very similar to the driver, who hit me at the corner of Decarie and Ponsar).


For the same reason (because my note was lost, and my memory is not a good lead, because 2 streets look very identical) I am not sure, if this accident happened at Ponsar or the next, Saranak Street, but, most likely, at Ponsar.


Considering that the light-colored car 988-PPH Quebec was turned towards me even more than the car on the top picture, and was further from the intersection, it is difficult to believe that the driver did not catch my emergence at least by his lateral sight (it is enough to look at the lowermost picture to understand, how well everything is viewed through at this intersection). For the same reason, the car, so significantly turned towards the right turn (and, besides: when moved, trying to cut off - sharply - the corner): had to beat me down somewhere on the last centimeters of the sidewalk. It is especially very probable, because I made a full stop before the intersection (before continuing my movement) not at the edge of the sidewalk - where it passes to the carriageway, - but where the bottom border of the 2-nd picture comes to an end. [See the pictures below].


The photo shows clearly that the pavement here is low at the corner, level with a pavement.


Almost for certain - to cut off the corner, the driver grasped the curb in the bend. On the other hand, serious measurements and calculations are necessary for serious assumptions. It is possible to approach the accident from different angles of view, having assumed that the absence of visible external damages, and, thus - serious internal traumas - not a "unique" virtue of my organism, but a very skillful and artful calculation of a master-class driver deliberately rushing on me. But a question of deliberate or unintentional driver"s actions can be never solved. The police should be engaged in it, but the police (one more improbable strangeness for Montreal) - evaded from police duties, ignoring my report.


A next strangeness: the driver aggressively thrown his car from a place it was standing as if saw a "gap" in the line of cars moving continuously in the column (perpendicularly to him down the street on Decarie), and intended to attached his car (by a similar dangerous maneuver) in the tail of the last car before this "breach". However, no slightest interval-break between cars existed (I remembered it absolutely clearly: there were 3-4 more cars right on this intersection till the next "window" of moving bumper to bumper cars). So, it turns out that he rushed on maximum starting speed directly to a blank wall of traffic with no single "window". What for?


During that trip I broke my principles for the first - and the last - time, and 1) went on the sidewalk, though behind the columns and trees-poles where pedestrians do not walk, + 2) did not get down from the saddle, when crossing the streets (which extends the time of a trip 2 times). Whether it is not strange, that exactly in this one and only occasion the "destiny" took advantage - and I was hit by car? Whether it was casually that during next several years the police went all out, using illegal methods and false statements, to present me as a violator, allegedly, driving (on bike) on sidewalks?


Additional strangeness: the driver, whose car - after the collision with the bicycle - should bear deep scratches and other damages, should (on Canadian standards) take coordinates of the injured cyclist that - if the later has a private insurance - to solve the question of sides" participation in the repair of the looking absolutely brand new car, but he evaded from any contacts, as if obviously considered himself guilty, or by all means wished to conceal his name, his identity. Besides, the law obliged him to call police and Ambulance immediately, and to remain on place before their arrival. However, the fact that he attacked me verbally at once, accompanying his verbal attack by screaming and accusing me that it was me who provoked the accident, tells that he did not see any personal guilt, any negligence or violation, and it means that he only desired to hide his identity by all means and it was his unique motive for both the violation of the law and the instant decision to pay for his car repair from his own pocket.


In the previous notes I, clearly, concentrated more on the accident itself: a fresh drama events always "magnetizes" our attention. But now I must emphasize how, after getting heavy injuries, I was "treated" (it is more correctly to tell: was NOT treated) in the medical institutions of Montreal.


If to consider the accident rolled into one with the sabotage of the 1-st (as well as "2-nd", "3-rd", etc.) medical help, this ominous "duet" can be qualified as an attempt at my life.


In my previous reports about the events on October 2-nd, 2007 I offered 4 hypotheses:


1) The accident around 21:15 was a casual accident with no one"s guilt, except me and the absent-minded driver who unintentionally hit me because of his carelessness.


2) The driver was used as an accidental tool without his conceit - by means of the modern military technology and the incompetent omnipotence of the intelligence services.


3) The "accident" was a planned (in advance (for half an hour or in 2-3 hours) action - in which the driver played an active role, waiting for me at the corner of Decarie and Ponsar streets, and having deliberately struck me by his car. (This scenario should include the surveillance BEFORE I emerged at the corner of Decarie and Ponsar: when - crossing Queen Mary Street - I changed my usual practice, and did not descend from the bicycle at this intersection [remaining in the saddle], and such a pattern of a temporary change of my behavior could be expected for the following course of my movement on the streets, and could contribute to a "prepared accident").


4) The driver and his car (possibly: with the replaceable fake plate numbers) were tools of the surveillance on me, and he waited for me at this intersection, but he thought that miscalculated and lost me from his sight, and, preoccupied by those calculations, hit me because those worries distracted his attention.


5) The incident was an accident, but was used by monsters of the repressive organizations or of the bodies, having huge influence on doctors and hospitals, for squaring of accounts with me.


I will add number 6 to these 5 hypotheses, which I developed much later.


What, if the local, Federal Canadian intelligence services, suspected that the accident was staged by some allied organizations (like "friendly" intelligence services of other countries), and started to screen and cover up their "colleagues", which inevitably caused the sabotage of medical diagnoses concerning the traumas, and - naturally - the treatment. In this case, even if this road accident was a real accident, it - already during the further succession of events - virtually ceased to be it.


All arguments of pros and cons of each of the offered hypotheses were already stated in other sections of this cycle of articles. With my limited recourses and in my situation any of the listed above versions, probably, never can be neither confirmed, nor disproved.


Taking into consideration all of already presented (in other parts of this epic) arguments, and having connected them to scandalous and shocking incidents at the Emergency Room (ER), any objective arbitrator is compelled to agree with the real possibility that on October 2, 2007, someone planned, prepared and carried out an attempt at my life or health, i.e., otherwise, has staged this artificial accident. Or that - after October 2, 2007, - allowing a possible probability of such a motivation of the accident, the Canadian federal intelligence services organized a campaign of a cover-up of the driver, carrying up the concealment of data on his car and his identity, and the sabotage of diagnostics and treatment of my traumas. They also did not allow to proceed my report to the police about the accident, and blocked the investigation.


Rather recently (2015) one of my sources found out (by the car"s plate number) the name of the driver, who hit me on October 2, 2007. It is (according to the source) S. Gershkovich or Gershkovits (S. Herskovitz), a young Jewish Zionist. The same source argues that he is known under a name "Solomon Gershkovich". It is necessary to take into consideration the possibility of a provocation in connection with the above-stated information. It would be favorable to my foes to expose me as an idiot and to insinuate doubts in my honesty. Therefore, it is impossible to exclude that someone gave me an obviously incorrect information about the name of the driver (i.e. behind this misinformation stood the same sinister people who arranged the accident (if it was not an accidental accident).


On the other hand, it is necessary not to forget about a characteristic passion of secret and semi-secret societies to the ominous symbolic and hints, and to assume that - even if the driver of the light-colored car 988-PPH (apparently, Lexus, Mazda, or Hyundai) was not called S. Gershkovich (Gershkovits) - someone by name of Gershkovich took direct part in preparation of the attempt at me or in the usage of the accident for the punishment of me.


If it will become known that the owner of the car and 1 or 2 individuals, who have the right to drive the light-colored new car 988-PPH, are not Gershkovichs (Gershkovits), it does not refute a possibility that someone else, named Gershkovich (Gershkovits), ALSO has the right to drive the same car.


The full explanation why it is so important will be offered below.


So, on October 2, 2007, around 21:00, I was hit by brand new white car 988-PPH at the corner of Decarie and Ponsar (or Saranac).


Having got home, I called 911 (police) to report the accident, giving approximate time and place, car"s plate number and its color. But the connection was interrupted, or something did not work properly. Then I dialed the number 911 again, and, it seems, someone muttered something in the tube though the voice sounded as if from far away and through a "veil" of extraneous sounds. I waited and waited, but my condition worsened at this time, my fears concerning the traumas have amplified, and I was compelled to stop the dialing attempts.


When I realized that the injuries are rather heavy, and my condition worsens, there remained nothing else but to address to urgent medical care.


CHAPTER 3


3 OCTOBER 2007.


[03 Oct. 2007: 00.51 (night-morning) - arrival at the department of the Emergency Room (St.-Mary"s Hospital);


03 Oct. 2007: 3.15 (morning) - doctor"s assessment.


03 Oct. 2007: 5.15 mornings - it is sent home]


At 00:51, on October 3, 2007, my wife took me by car to the department of the Emergency (St.-Mary"s Hospital) on Lacombe Street, with the following symptoms:


1) An injury of both feet-legs, painful everywhere, with an acute pain in the blood vessels below the right knee.


2) Even more severe pain in the muscle of the lower part of the right leg.


3) Small "specks" from the blows; slightly brighter on the right leg.


4) The reddened skin higher and below the knee on the right foot.


5) Painful and hardening muscle of the right leg below the knee with pulsing and extending internally (defined on touch) hematoma.


5) Knots, small knots, swellings and hillocks (painful on touch) on both legs-feet along the blood vessels.


6) Periodic angiospasms of the right leg-foot accompanied by a mad pulsation in the vein and terrible pain when I tried rising from lying position (compression-decompression problem).


7) The thumb slightly pressed to the damaged area, felt pushes of "local earthquake", the breakthroughs, any frightening movement ("roar") inside.


8) Both left, and the right leg-feet looked a swelled up, which an experienced, skilled eye of the physician or triage nurse would note in no time.


9) The left elbow slightly ached a bit, but then I did not give it a value.


And now let"s see, how the triage nurse (October 3, 2007, 1.05 night-morning) described my condition and complaints:


What a short text and what a long list of falseness!


(see below)


Let's begin with the next deliberate "mistake": the time of my arrival was specified as 1.05, but the time of the incident in the column "Subjective supervision" is noted: "this evening" - though "THIS evening" did not come yet. Here obviously is not an illiteracy of the nurse, but a deliberate mockery and a manner-distorting style as a technique or a method of the intended distortion of facts.


[Further, in the column "Medications" (Medicaments) - are mentioned: my blood pressure controlling pill and ASA (aspirin?) 80 mp though I did not receive any aspirin in ER. However, I could take aspirin at home, because a doctor from a walk-in clinic prescribed it for 2 years, and in some periods I took it daily, or sometimes did not take aspirin for months. However, if the triage nurse indicated that an aspirin was given to me at ER: this is not true. The same corresponds to this note if ASA is not aspirin. I was not given any medications at ER.]


When I came to ER with the same trauma next time - I stated then that already stopped aspirin in connection with the injuries (on the one hand - aspirin could help to resolve the blood clots, but on the another hand - to cause additional bleeding; none among the doctors in ER answered - what is better now: to continue or to stop aspirin!), - but doctors and nurses still were entering "aspirin" in the protocols" forms.


But these are not all the misleading records! Near the title of the column OBSERVATIONS SUBJECTIVES / SUBJECTIVE DATE there is a badge @ and the letters appnx. I asked the acquaintance once working as the triage nurse about this. She told that, in her opinion, it is a nonsense. If the similar remark is really relevant, it is possible to assume that "appnx" means "the truth is at appendix" - "the truth - in an appendix (in the appendix)" (and everything that on this page - falseness). The graphic arrangement of this abbreviation and a badge as an additional "letter" of the word DATE: DATE@ (or "at" - in an appendix) points to such an interpretation. (In other words: data and facts [original, instead of distorted], i.e. what means in medical questionnaires under the word DATE - in the appendix. The whole phrase should be read as follows: The FACTS are in the appendix).


However, I did not find any "appendix" in the medical archive.


The blood pressure was indicated as - 181 x 151: a nonsense again. The "bottom" pressure number cannot be higher then the "top". Whether the ratio of the systolic and diastolic blood pressure can be in general like this, and the "bottom" pressure jump up to 181 [or even to 151] is doubtful (especially: at a patient without any history of similar phenomena). If such a pressure was really noted - then it would be necessary to declare immediately an alarm code (code rouge (Fr.) - red code (En.), to do an urgent injection, to call a cardiologist, and to hospitalize the patient.


In the column "Pulse": 89, what is quite plausible, considering the situation and the condition, but later I changed my opinion. My normal pulse rate is 58-60, and in a stressful situation or after an injury: 70 maximum. Besides, if there was the pulse "90", it required, again, a "code rouge".


In the column Signes neuro / Neuro Signs - there is an Avo X3 [already mentioned above acquaintance (a former nurse) characterized it as nonsense as well].


I can suggest that there, probably, not AVO, but A/O, which can mean "Application of". But this acronym is, seemingly, deliberately traced as AVO - Apprehended Violence Order (AVO): a legal police and judicial term. It is the judgment against a person, whose actions, words, or the general behavior forces others to feel a threat to their safety. Even if there is a similar medical acronym with another meaning, the sign AVO all the same was not casual, but was used as a hint on Apprehended Violence Order (AVO), and X3 is the "3rd" (highest) degree. If it is so, the triage nurse characterized me as a dangerous "person of aggressive behavior", i.e. under the pretext of a forged "psychological portrait" deceptively transformed a victim of an accident into a criminal. Just don"t prepare a premature expression of sarcasm and disbelief that "a simple nurse" could operate by such Jesuit, casuistic methods. Her worthy a corrupted police inspector legal grasp-readiness and an ill-intentioned ingenuity prove themselves in other parts of this document with all evidence and definiteness.


Let"s go back to the column "SUBJECTIVE SUPERVISION" to be convinced:


9.10 this evening - was crossing street while on bike - car was at left resting position - to avoid "falling under car" - jumped onto hood - then landed on feet c/o right calf pain - impact on hood - no LOC.


I will not repeat about "this evening", which did not come yet. I told that the MOVING car hit me at the corner of Decarie and Ponsar, but, instead of this concrete accuracy and definiteness, she wrote intentionally: "crossed the street". It not simply a malicious and intended distortion of the words of the victim and patient, but a deliberate falsification of victim"s story, for the purpose of introducing into already deliberately distorted record of his words an element of unauthenticity and uncertainty. I named the car"s plate number, and car"s type, model and color, and insisted that it must be entered into the triage report, but the nurse (as we can see from the triage document) ignored my demand. It turns out that the nurse approves the following (allegedly: "from mine" own words): The patient - on bike - crossed any (it is NOT KNOWN WHICH!) street. At the left, motionlessly stood any (it is NOT KNOWN WHAT! - though I called an exact plate license number, color, type and brand model of the car, which then still remembered). It sounds like: at the left, supposedly, there was a car, and - all of a sudden! - the cyclist suddenly jumped on the hood for "not to fall down under the car"!


Only at first sight this utter nonsense looks like an "artless" lie (distortion of my words) or an illiterate record. Actually, it is a very thin-sophisticated thought-over and artfully garbled falsification, with a filigree forged inversion of the sense of an original narration to an opposite - on a method, which allows doing it with a minimum of distortions.


Really, approximately at 21:10 - 21:15 I - on bike - I was about to cross the Ponsar Street where this street rests against Decarie. Really, a car - at the left - stood motionless at the same intersection. It is also true that I - having reacted in just a few fractions of a second to an inevitable blow of a suddenly darted-off (without restraint) and speeding on me car - made all possible efforts not to get under the direct front stroke of the "radiator", and not to fall down under the wheels, but, instead, to land on top of car"s hood. So, what is the lie? And the lie is not in an irreparable distortion of my words, but in a deliberate, undoubtedly ill-intentioned OMISSION (made during the listing of the events line) of the MOST IMPORTANT WORDS (FACT) - that the new light-color car with Quebec number 988-PPH has rushed directly at me at the maximal starting speed, and hit me at the intersection without even having braked. Everything that concerns the car"s MOVEMENT and the INROAD is thrown out from the nurse"s "retelling", while the first thing that I told, having taken seat on a chair before the nurse: is that I WAS HIT BY CAR. Let's agree that there is a fundamental and basic difference between the phrases "I was hit by car" and "I hit the car (struck the car)"!


I also demanded to write down - in the official report - the plate number of the car, which hit me - 988-PPH Quebec, - and the nurse told that she did so, but, when I received a copy of the documents: it appeared that she was lying.


The same extremely cynical lie can be found in the column "OBSERVATIONS OBJECTIVES / OBJECTIVE DATE": "Avo X3 - no deteriority, bruisory, or redness, or swelling noted (to) of right calf. Denies any pains - no abrasion or deformity noted at this time - no C/O or H/A or dizziness".


"Denies any pains" [that is: the patient; a very strange for the Canadian medical practice mentioning of the 3-rd person] .


There is a natural question: why then I came to ER?! For what purpose? Is not this was the purpose of the reports that the selling nurse and her colleagues forged to achieve that particular impression?


And, again, all this - not simply an unprecedented lies. Here - as well - the real, truthful narratives and facts deliberately delivered with an opposite sense due to artfully placed accents and skillfully grouped remarks.


It is ridiculous to assume that this Anglophone nurse was unable to understand properly my fluent Canadian English.


It was impossible to observe some very striking evident of complications and symptoms yet (though - it depends of what to understand by it) because of the time factor: not enough time passed from the moment of trauma. And the triage nurse definitely knew about it! It was possible to observe more striking signs of my injuries only after 3-4 more hours, which is such a basic medical fact that even a 1-years studying student nurse would know it.


Further follows a pure frank misinformation. The swelling and redness were not yet manifested very strongly - but were visible and undeniable! (I pointed to them, but the nurse declared [in reply to mine gestures and words] that she sees "nothing significant"). I declared at once about strong, all to accruing pain along the vessels, but the nurse resorted to a frank lie in her report, having specified the opposite. Grazes, deformation, dizziness, etc. - they were absent, indeed. So: it turns out that if to ignore the "divergence" on reddening and swellings and to "forget" about an absolutely idiotic note "he denies that feels at least the slightest pain" (!!!?), all her "objective observations" are true?!


In 3-4 hours after the accident both left and right calves swelled up, and in the areas of squeezing and blows the red spots became visible "with an open eye". It was not necessary to be a physician to "notice" (to see) these reddening and tumors. And the nurses and doctors have argued for weeks that "see nothing".


In total 4 pictures are made in 17-24 hours after the trauma.


In 3-4 hours after the accident both left and right calves swelled up, and in the areas of squeezing and blows the red spots became visible "with an open eye". It was not necessary to be a physician to "notice" (to see) these reddenings and a tumors. And the nurses and doctors have argued for weeks that "see nothing". Those pictures were made in 17-24 hours after the accident.


And again - in the same way, as in her "subjective observations", - the most important component of deception is not what she WROTE (except for some absolutely frankly absurd and false statements that I, allegedly, assured that I do not feel "a slightest pain") - but what she CONCEALED.


And she concealed (i.e. did not mention at all in her records) the following:


1) In reply to my complaints about the severe pain because of the damaged vessels of the r. leg (I told exactly [literally] so) - she suggested to determine this pain by a denary scale what I rejected. (And in her records she wrote that I denied any pain).


2) She also concealed that I spoke about the damaged vessels.


3) She also concealed (without having mentioned it in the official report) that I suggested to her that she can be convinced about the hardening (hematoma) if she touches the muscle of my right leg.


4) She also concealed that I complained of angiospasms and spontaneous strong pulsations in the blood vessels.


5) She also concealed that I pointed to small knots and hillocks along the blood vessels.


To paint the full picture, let"s add that - in contradiction to all false entries in the above presented triage document - in the general data field (appearing in other documents as well) she specified in the column Responsabilite du paiment - "MSSS avec accident" (a road accident with traumatic events - Fr.) and (in the column Renseignements Supplementaire) - "hit by car" (En.).


This improbably monstrous history is supplemented by my subjective impression that I am seeing in front of me a political activist or a sect member, or a participant of an aggressive antireligious, or, on the contrary, religious group with a long stage, besides - having some relation to police. (If I was more naive and "simpler" - I would even ask a question: whether a female police officer was "planted" in the triage room for the period of my visit?).


[A shocking provocation in the Emergency Room of MGH hospital (HGM - Fr.) on April 24, 2015, staged by the triage nurse, by its style and methods reminds the style and methods of the triage nurse on October 3, 2007, in St-Mary's hospital to such an extent that, since April 25, I asked more than once a question: whether the same nurse, Joann Priestley (Joanna Priestley), participated both in the 1st, and in the 2nd provocation? Having inquired about madam Joann Priestley, I found out that before MGH (HGM - Fr.) she worked as the triage nurse in English Children's Hospital at Tuper Street (Rene-Levek-Dorchester). Whether she worked in 2007 in St.-Mary"s hospital is not known. In the official report from October 3, 2007, the name of the triage nurse was not printed, but, instead, there is only her signature. Her name is precisely coincides on initials of J. (Joanna) and P. (Priestley) [as to the surname - in my opinion, there is something really similar to "Priestley" in her signature]. But even if there were 2 different personalities - 2 complete coincidences of styles and methods mean that they were trained and instructed by the same person: a police officer or a member of the intelligence services. In my opinion, it is obvious.]


After her I got a citizen of Israel by name of Judith. Probably, not an ardent Zionist, but with an Israeli passport, and spoke "Hebrew". A stagiaire (an intern), this pleasant, nice girl agreed with the legitimacy of my request to demand veins ultrasound. She checked my whole body very carefully, each bone, each joint, each rotary and bending motion (and, as though by the way, said (I caught a characteristic accent) that - besides English and French - speaks Hebrew).


The young doctor by name of Judith treated me in a friendly way - contrary to the triage nurse, - who (from the very first second) sniffed and fixed on me her eyes, hating. However, it is worth to remember that it is easier and simpler to oblige a doctor with an Israeli passport "to keep secret" (not to disclose information), or to harm someone on the order of army commanders. Not only men, but also women (especially physicians) are persons liable for call-up (military compulsory service) army service in Israel - and, using it, the interested persons (among them - war criminals) can always shut them down. Whether it is casual that not only Judith's written report, but in general a slightest mention of her is completely absent in the documents from ER (3-rd October, 2007) [among ALL the documents received from the medical archive]. It is absolutely improbable for the bureaucratized and scrupulous (concerning the reports) Canadian state medical practice. Probably, her official report "was not entered" on the order of some OTHER services - and consequently was withdrawn?


It is impossible to exclude completely another possibility. What, if "Judith" was not listed among the hospital"s staff, was not a doctor-trainee (an intern), had no right to examine me, and was simply an agent (with medical education and functions) of someone's subversive-terrorist intelligence group or an army? May be, not casually in the official report"s form, filled by the doctor Stephen Gershkovich (her curator), in a separate place and absolutely off topic it was specified: "the patient is inclined to obesity". What this had to do with the report on the injuries, which I received as a result of an accident? Besides, I had absolutely no fat, and was in the best form in that period. However, it is still true that I am predisposed to obesity. So, in such a case, only a doctor with an experience and training, received at war, or from the work with the prisoners, or in liaison: could connect the dots - and make suck a conclusion. And the closest candidate for such a conclusion was the same Judith, whose observation Dr. Gershkovich included in his own report as his own finding. But - for him - there was no motivation and no reason.


As we can see: it was absolutely inadmissible for someone not only to "expose" "Judith" conclusions, but also to reveal her very presence at St.-Mary"s ER on October 3, 2007, not mentioned her participation in the medical check-up.


But even if we assume, that Judith really was trained under a supervision of doctor Stephen Gershkovich (Gershkovits) and lawfully participated in patient"s assessment - even in that case someone did not want to "expose" her: no way!


After this young intern with the foreign state"s citizenship I got to the next potential citizen of the same state - Dr. Stephen Gershkovich (or Gershkovits).


Possibly, the nurse and the doctor were insufficiently instructed about me, because the medical report of one contradicts another one. If the nurse, as presented above, stated as if I "denied" the presence of even the slightest pain - her colleague, doctor Gershkovich (Gershkovits), in the column "the final diagnosis" scratched "the left foot pain". (Really, one hand does not know what another is doing! After all, it was a question not about the left, but about the right leg! But it is just necessary to turn the page and - focus-pokus! - the left foot turns to be the right: but about this - later).


1 of 3 pages of Dr. Gershkowich"s report (see below):


The "diagnosis" itself is amazing: "left foot pain!". As if this was written not by a doctor. This is the same if someone wrote in the field "diagnosis": "illness".


But it is too prematurely to cease to be surprised. On the face of the questionnaire form, it was specified that I am 51 years old (they rejuvenated me!), and on the back of the same document"s page: "56-year-old man" (right there made me old!):


____________________________________________


"56 y.o. with soft tissue injury to right lower leg. No evidence of compartment syndrome. Seen & examened: no bone [displacement], no compartment syndrome, no # [bone fracture] - follow ups - FMC in 2 days, Ws: (non-readable at all) & duplex - likely deep bruise tibia". ____________________________________________


(An interesting note "was examined and checked": without mentioning WHO examined and checked, i.e. without any mention of "Judith" though it is an absolutely obvious reference to ANOTHER person who was carrying out the physical examination).


Again, a contradiction on a contradiction! If the diagnosis is exclusively "the left foot pain" (period!), than how could be understood ascertain "traumas of soft tissue (...) the right foot", and - "likely deep bruise tibia". Whether there can be more absurd combination!!! The nurse invented that the patient completely denies pain, and the doctor "erects" "pain" into the diagnosis. It is clear: there is nothing more to add for the doctor who does not want to treat the patient, but the formulary demands a diagnosis. I am more than sure: all listed absurdities and lapses in medical reports reflect a "small" confusion" of these, who hoped to get rid of an "unwanted person" by means of car"s hit, and suddenly saw him alive and almost safe. By writing this paragraph I do not acclaim that the accident WAS a planned attempt for sure, but just that learning about the circumstances, some of my enemies thought that I am finished.


After SUCH a hit the victim of the accident should be on his back!


After all - even if the accident was not a planned (arranged) attempt on my life (but a true accident), all interested persons quickly learned about this event, and right there found out all the details.


The dialogue between me - and mister Gershkovich (Gershkovitsem) - was just amazing. I asked the doctor to bandage professionally my right leg or - better - both (because left too suffered); to administrate antibiotics; in 8-12 days - heparin; to do the ABC injection + physiological solution and intravenous in hand; to organize a consultation with an expert in this field, like a phlebolog (better: a specialist on blood vessels injuries); to make an injection of thrombin; to choose a suitable anti-inflammatory; and to send me immediately for an ultrasound of legs-feet veins (duplex + Doppler) - from pelvic bones up to feet inclusive.


I told the doctor that a large vessel of the right leg under the knee - is bleeding, and that a hematoma is forming itself in the muscle. I also said that there is an ischemia of the right leg"s calf muscle (blood badly arrives), that the embolic threat is quite possible. And, finally, I told that - after the road accident - painful thrombus are already consolidating along the blood vessels, and that at the moment of changing the body position from horizontal to vertical the whole calf of the right leg is penetrated by terrible pain (a compression-decompression problem).


I demanded an ultrasound test of the blood vessels of both legs-feet, and more precisely: so-called "double" Doppler.


What did doctor Gershkovich (Gershkovits) answer to my complaints and requests?


He only laughed (loud "ha-ha-ha"); told that there is no need for an x-ray and ultrasound; and recommended ice, rest and Tylenol.


The most shocking were: a refusal of an ultrasound; and the recommendations ("ice" and "rest") without any explanations (how to put ice and for how long; how many times or hours per day; how many hours per days to "have rest", etc.).


Another interesting detail: though doctor Gershkovich (Gershkovits) also noted in the summary "after 2 days - an appointment in hospital"s out-patients clinic" - he did not tell me anything about it - and - if - before leaving - I did not visit the registration desk"s nurse, I could leave without any referral to clinic"s doctor. To whom only I did not address that night in ER! Registration desk"s nurse, triage nurse, security guards, and doctors: nobody registered the accident"s details (car"s brand, color and license plate number; streets, where happened the road accident; etc.); nobody contacted police though in such cases it is their direct duty. In spite of the fact that I have reported all the details of the accident to ER"s staff, and asked to inform the police, nobody wanted to cooperate, and all of them told me that to inform the police - is my private affair. They refused to issue any reference, despite all my demands.


They told me to show up in 2 days in the hospital"s clinic, and the exact time should be appointed by phone.


One more page filled by doctor Gershkovich (Gershkovitsem) at 3 o'clock 15 minutes is not less interesting. The age of the patient is again specified here, but in addition was SUDDENLY added: Unemployed (jobless).


First, a clarification of patient"s social status by a doctor is considered as mischief, violation of privacy law, and discrimination in medical practice, and in Canada in 2007, we must say directly - an unprecedented thing. It is not ethical for a doctor to be interested in a social status of his patient, and especially - to mention it in medical documents.


Secondly, I did not tell anything to Gershkovich (Gershkovits) about myself, and especially: that - formally - I am not working officially [actually, I am participating in many musical projects, I cooperate with musicians, authors, I write books and compose music...]. So, how it became known to him? If I would be receiving welfare - it could be registered somewhere. But I am not on welfare, and, when someone does not live on welfare - his social status in general is not registered anywhere. This alone already gives the records of doctor Gershkovich (Gershkovits) a scandalous shadow.


Another interesting feature: deliberate illegibility of his handwriting particularly on this page (on other pages he wrote in general tolerantly legible) - even by medical standards. The medical worker who helped me to decode abracadabra of some phrases of Mr. Gershkovich"s writing - also agreed with such an assessment. Here - literally - all records on this page:


_______________________________________

Centre hospitalier de St. - Mary

St. - Mary"s Hospital Center

____________________

3830, avenue Lacombe,

Montreal, Quebec, H3T 1M5


NOTES D'EVOLUTION

PROGRESS NOTES


03.10.2007, 3:15.


56 years old male, unemployed.


Clinical: Right lower leg pain due to biking accident.


HPI: Patient on bike at intersection at around 21.00, when a stoper car accelerated towards him.


He hit the car with his arm, then fell on ground. No hit head, no LOC [loss of consciousness], no nausea / vomiting. Pain started to develop in lower right leg at around 22.00, non-redicting, 4/10, yet on palpation of medial law leg pain 9/10. No temperature, no SOB, no ... & inconthence.

Patient denies drug / alcohol use - no paresthecias.


PMHX: HTN.


Apendectomy.

___________________________________

___________________________________


Further follow the parameters of pressure, pulse, breath, etc., and - also (one more AMAZING detail): approximate weight, height, special signs (birthmarks, etc.), hair color and eye color.


[According to a physician, who helped me to "decipher" an unreadable scribble of doctor Gershkovich (Gershkovits)] :


HD DVI: PUPIL FERRA.


mouth: no oropharyngx


WS: no murmur/bilateral equal pulses, VE, LE, no pedal edema.


Lungs: GAEB, no flair chest, [this part I skipped]


Abdominal: soft, no BS, slight tender CLQ.


MSH: no vertebral tenderness, tender

centerior & medial arpert right leg

with sign of early euhymosis on left hill.


No ROM (...) leg extension, knee flexible,

doni/plantar flexis, but?? pain with palpation

medial lower leg doni / plantar flexis


The patient is inclined to obesity.

_______________________________________

_______________________________________


There is a whole bunch of strange, unusual for medical ethics and practice details and features.


First - as was already notices - it was emphasized that the patient is unemployed. At 1-st glance, it was needed in case of insurance policy and solvency, concerning the accidents. However, when I asked ER doctors, who worked in another hospital, they said that this is not hospitals" busyness, and never practiced in ER. Besides, there are dozens of other reasons. So, an only explanation and purpose of this remark: to let know his colleagues-physicians that they have free hands to do everything they want with this person: this patient has no money to hire a lawyer and to bring the matters to the court. (Besides, if we suggest that this data was needed for the legal matters around the accident, then, first of all, the triage nurse and the doctor had to register the street names (where the accident happened); the brand, color, and plate license number of the car, which caused the injuries; but they sabotaged the inscription of this vital information).


Secondly, there is a stunningly striking contradiction between the official clean copy of the front "face" printing diagnosis ("the left foot pain") [with the sabotage of diagnostics and medical measures] - and almost an objective report in the "inside", "internal" scribble. It gives such an impression that Mr. Stephen Gershkovich (Gershkovits) has issued 2 absolutely separate medical certificates: one - an official and distorted: for the uninitiated; and another one - for "internal use", i.e. "for the initiated".


It is possible to assume that 2 absolutely different purposes should coincide with these 2 "absolutely different" medical certificates:


1) to falsify the diagnosis and to sabotage the medical care;


and


2) to record for someone an objective report on a real-true condition of the accident"s victim:


a) about his biometric features and signs;

b) about his specific physio-biological features ("he is inclined to obesity", "tonsils are removed", "appendix is removed", etc.);

c) about whether or not the victim was under the influence of narcotic substances or alcohol at the moment of the accident;

d) about his socio-economic status ("he is unemployed");

e) + about the truthful (objective) circumstances of the accident.


And, again, if we suggest that this data was needed for some legal matters around the accident, then, first of all, the triage nurse and the doctor had to register the street names (where the accident happened); the brand, color, and plate license number of the car, which caused the injuries; the description of the driver; etc., but they sabotaged the inscription of this information


It is possible to assume that he deliberately hid a true picture of the injuries in the inside pages:


1) due to an insignificantly small probability that the patient will ever make a request on receiving these pages;


2) due to the red tape practice of the medical archive (indeed, I managed to obtain these pages with huge difficulty);


3) and, finally, due to intentionally illegible medical scribble (in contrast to the front-face printed out). [And - indeed: just approximately 1 year ago I learned how to read the handwritten medical records in French and English.]


It also became clear that Mr. Stephen Gershkovich (Gershkovits) used very rare, or, not excluded - even forbidden - medical acronyms and symbols, and deliberately filled some lines employing an almost absolutely illegible handwriting.


That is why the final diagnosis on the title page says "the left foot pain", but in the internal sheets Dr. Gershkovits allowed a probability of post-traumatic thrombosis (and thus: the refusal to do the ultrasound on patient"s request was a serious violation of medical ethics and protocols), and described the road accident almost responsibly, if not consider some "tiny" details. (One of the examples: "He struck the car with his hand - and fell down to the ground"!).


It is interesting that the triage nurse has noted the time of accident precisely from my words - 21.10, and doctor Gershkovich - replaced it by 21.00. Why or what for? Perhaps, he already knew the exact time of the incident? But from what sources? Whether from those that already informed him that I am officially not working?


Interestingly that - instead of recording my words about the pain in the soft tissue of the bottom of both legs (and stronger - in the right leg linked to the blood vessels" damage) right after the road accident (with pain"s sharp strengthening approximately in an hour) - he argues that the pain has manifested from 22.00.


I already wrote that the triage nurse suggested to "estimate" pain on a 10-ball scale, but I refused (I consider that it as an idiotic method suitable only for a very limited group of people). Doctor Gershkovich (Gershkovits) never discussed with me such a "measurement" on a "10-ball scale". On the one hand, the difference in pain when at rest and when pressing a sore point is described by him quite adequately. On the other - the style and the graphic manner of his letter can quite be a sign for his colleagues-physicians not to exclude a suspicion of simulation.


It confirms a repeated mention of pain at palpation, combined (as a former nurse argues) with some rare medical acronyms - synonyms of question marks. [Especially that he uses 2 such "badges".]


Besides, he attested the pain level on some (whether the 10-ball?) scale, but he did not ask me to describe the pain intensity by any scale, and only pressed by fingers on the sore points.


The resume of doctor Gershkovich (Gershkovits) causes the following number of serious questions:


1) For whom was composed this resume, except medical doctors and hospital staff? Such details as removed appendix and tonsils, records about weight, height (?), eyes" color (?), birth marks, and other biometric data are brought by prison doctors in questionnaires for an additional identification of criminals (prisoners). Unless this NOT medical data was intend for some not so "medical" services?


2) Why had doctor Gershkovich (Gershkovits) to repeat the ontological-factological (non-medical) description of the accident: unless it is not a prerogative of the triage nurse? But - if he did it (again - after the triage nurse interrogating me) - than why, at my request, he did not noted in his records the name of the streets (where the accident happened); the color, brand and plate license number of the car; the description of the driver; and so on? For whom was prepared this record, and also the phrase "the patient denies, that was under the influence of drugs or alcohol"?


3) If such an extremely meticulous examination with the extremely detailed description was made: how could happen that the diagnosis is only "pain in the right leg"s calf" (in general looking as an amateur"s marginal remark, not a conclusion of a professional physician)? The mountain gave birth to a mouse? Especially it is implausible and improbable for the reason that doctor Gershkovich (Gershkovits) specialized (as I learned much later) in this area: traumas and medical radiology - in particular: Ultrasound.


4) Proceeding from the previous 3 points and considering that the examination was performed very professionally, the diagnosis "post-traumatic thrombosis" was absolutely inevitable, and this means that doctor Gershkovich (Gershkovits) deliberately sabotaged it.


5) By his bold, flat refusal to respond to patient"s resolute demand to do the ultrasound test (of the blood vessels of BOTH legs-feet) - doctor Gershkovich (Gershkovits) consciously and deliberately threatened the health and life of his patient.


6) Beside a deliberate blow to patient"s health, such a categorical unwillingness to issue an ultrasound test could have for an object a cover up in favor of the car"s driver: more time passed from the moment of the accident - more difficult it would be then to prove that the thrombosis was developed not "by itself", but as the result of the road accident.


I definitely will not be mistaken, having emphasized that from this point the dramatic contrast between careful examinations, and sometimes also careful testing, and - on the other hand - their absolutely zero effect concerning the diagnostics and treatment: became even more obvious. Since 2001 the results of careful and most professional examinations by the best Montreal doctors, the results of the analyses and tests like vanish in "a black hole", without influencing in any way the treatment"s character and inefficiency (is would be more true: its absence). Their vast majority goes not for the benefit to me, and only depress. Conclusions from the analyses and other tests or their values are concealed from me, and the obtained data can be used by everybody and for everything, though for the further blasting of my health.


Were the doctors, having received all (clearing up the diagnosis) results and perfectly knowing the prognosis of one of the diseases (which destroys my bone system), deliberately concealed the results and the diagnosis that I could not be able to prevent the illness to do its dirty work, and, giving me false medical information and provoking me to obviously erroneous assumptions, wanted to make me a disabled person? Certainly, no! It is the SYSTEM, in the different ways and methods, and, in particular, making me in their eyes odious, artfully destroys any possibility of a constructive dialogue and normal mutual understanding.


On the other hand: if the numerous and various testing and medical exams did not lead to any constructive treatment of my main diseases, and did not vocalized for me ANY diagnosis: for whom and for what purpose all this saved-up medical information, and why any doctor - in reply to my insistence - did not named for me any diagnosis concerning the problems of my health?


Certainly, from the bottom of my social and socioeconomic abyss it is impossible to see the answers to these questions and consequently they will remain riddles for me (which versions can be presented in a large quantity), and I can only guess about them (without excluding the health care politicization: that the health care is used for political goals and repressions).


It is not excluded that the health care could be potentially used for political repressions on the higher scale.


While the things are done differently in Canada then in United States (where political assassinations and attempts are elements of their national culture), even in Canada there used to happen rare events, which gave food for some sort of suspicions. We can recall, for example, the circumstances surrounding the death of Prime-Minister Jean Chrétien"s (who become objectionable because of his ideas about Canada"s separation from the dinosaur British feudal monarchy) father shortly before the actual Stephen Harper"s coup-d"état; or Clark"s (party leader of progressive conservatives) "just in time" death, which freed the way for Harper, who hijacked ("stole") Clark"s party - as terrorists skyjack the plane; or how "just in time" the malignant tumor sent to the grave such an extraordinary person as Jack Layton - an only headache for the disgusting Harper"s regime. We can recall how a VERY rare "body eating" bacterium "improbably" "just in time" ate out the foot of the former Quebec"s Prime Minister - Lucien Bouchard: one of the most consecutive defenders of Quebec"s cultural heritage and distinctive lifestyle, and the principle supporter of Quebec"s separation from Canada. The list of similar examples can be widened. And, because most of them were related to the period shortly before Harper"s take-off to the political Olympus, or to Harper"s era itself: there is a well-grounded supposition that the political medical terror might been temporally employed in Canada by Harper regime"s hidden (or, rather, visible "man in black") supporters.


However, even if all these events were mere coincident, it is still possible (on the basis of my own experience and stories of other people) to assume that, parallel to the "health care" there is also an "anti-health-care", which goal - politically motivated and diameter opposite - serves the opposite purposes?


Then "anti-doctors" should exist as well, or, in addition, doctors can be compelled - from time to time - to become "anti-doctors"?


If a frequent flashing of the similar suspicious facts in Canada - is not a sad chain of mere accidents: in that case, a saved-up medical information can be used not for patient"s treatment, but for the opposite purposes, and then - purely theoretically - it is possible that within such a practice all personal medical data "escapes" somewhere and used for the opposite to the healing practice goals.


In our century of computer technologies and immoral principles of gigantic social networks" functioning - a sort of an "anti-treatment" is sculpted and planed after their model (with an embodiment in practice) in medical area?


And, if there is even a slightest probability for such a practice, then also exists a perfected mechanism of mutual responsibility and the concealment, which represents a big danger to ordinary patients in itself.


This picture is a proof that the left foot was also injured: a "moderate" visible hematoma, red spots from squeezing and blows, sprain, etc.


CHAPTER 4


4-5 OCTOBER 2007.


OCTOBER 4 2007


We will return, however, to the events of 2007.


All the terrifying primary external symptoms of my injuries - the strongest bruises, visible traumas - appeared a bit later, up to internal bleeding and caused by it subsequently an awful frighteningly looking hematoma. Only by then it was possible to see with open eyes the damage caused by the accident.


Nevertheless, no change in the attitude of doctors and nurses occurred. They pretended, as though do not see a terrible hematoma at all, and did not change the assessment of the gravity of my traumas, continuing to deny entirely an existence of any visible damages.


But even before the formation of this hematomas the redness and an obvious edema and bumps on the calves of both legs (see the photos above) should be evident to physicians. They perfectly understood, WHAT traumas I got, and WHAT could threaten me in case of complete refusal of an ultrasound test and the treatment.


I was simply lucky that no blood clot travel through the blood-stream to the most vital vessels of lungs, heart or brain, and that I did not lose a leg, foot or both legs, but it was exclusively a merit of my persistence on self-treatment and my will to recovery. (See the pictures (below, in the section for October 6, 2007) made during the beginning of internal bleeding, and when the bleeding stopped - and terrible bruise was formed).


In the hospital, I demanded a short summary at least for my (family, local) doctor, but even this was refused.


Without the visible horrific traces of damages and without a paper from the hospital it was senseless to call the police again. Having come back home, I carefully examined both legs-feet, and that caused a bigger concern. As I already noted: bigger knots, smaller knots, hillocks - very painful to the touch - were formed under skin and deeper, but the most disturbed me the zones of hardenings on top of the anklebone and calve of the right leg (a swelled-up superficial vein, in which, possibly, also a blood clot was formed), and a "spot" or a tiny cone (slightly elevated up from the skin) on the front surface of the left foot, several centimeters below the knee: both caused severe pain on touch, and when walking.


When I tried to press this quite notable lump on the left foot inside, without releasing it for some time, I suddenly (in 5 or 7 minutes) experienced a sharp and shrill heartache, on the left side. Without having special medical education, I prefer not to guess about the nature of this pain.


2 days and more passed, but I felt no relief, and just the opposite: each step demanded huge efforts and sufferings. And thus during the first 48 hours after the car accident (the most important for treatment of the complications of a trauma and prevention of further complications) I did not receive absolutely any medical care: even an ultrasound test was denied to me! Whether so casually I came into the hands of the 3 "specific" medical workers in ER?


OCTOBER 5 2007


[05 Oct. 2007: 6.15 a.m. - arrived to St-Mary's hospital"s ER by taxi [nobody called me about the time and date of the appointment in the external hospital"s clinic; so, I had to demand the appointment in the ER]


05 Oct. 2007: 15.10 - limped with unspeakable difficulties to St-Mary's hospital"s policlinic


05 Oct. 2007: 16.25 - limped from the clinic to ER office (through a long yard from the policlinic)


05 Oct. 2007: 18.10 - only after 2 hours of waiting got to the triage nurse, while the waiting room was almost empty (there where sitting "2 and a half" (being figuratively expressed) patients)


05 Oct. 2007: 20.00 - was examined by Dr. Paraveskopolus


05 2007: 20.10 - was sent home [came home by taxi]


However, my case was not solved, and the local Montreal troupe did not end its performance in a theater under the name of "Scene" (without an article in the translation and not).


So, from the taxi I got into the policlinic where had an appointment on October 5, at 15:10, and was sent - from the secretary"s desk - to Dr. Rosenberg.


So, like Dr. Gerskovits (Gershkovich) and Judith, Dr. Rosenberg was a real or a potential citizen of the same state - and their compatriot. I have no bigotry or prejudices against people of any origin, including representatives of this pseudo-ethnic minority. But - judging by other facts - there arises a justified question: whether or not casually I was directed to Dr. Rosenberg, and not to another doctor of this policlinic. Besides everything, she (theoretically) could have not just an "ethnic" surname, a genotype, manners and so on, but also the passport of the foreign state.


But before she in person came to examine me, I got into hands of one more potential citizen of the same state by name of Nathan. He presented himself as an intern-trainee, but I had an immediate sensation, which forced me to doubt if he"s really a doctor, and not a social agent, or simply an agent ("with clear implication").


His roguish, insincere manners and a habit (typical for rascals) to express himself with a tongue twister made him quite a suitable "candidate".


Later I tried to find out from Dr. Rosenberg who was Nathan and why I was examined by him before her, but she pretended that does not understand at all, what I am speaking about.


I told her about strengthening of pain, about hardenings, and about my concerns of possible post-traumatic thrombosis or thrombophlebitis, and again demanded an ultrasound ("Doppler") of the blood vessels.


She did not refuse the ultrasound directly, but declared that a unique possibility to pass an ultrasound - it is to return to ER. It was a polite form of a clever refusal.


Thus, after the car accident I faced 5 medical workers, one of which, possibly, could be a Christian Zionist (not excluded: with a Middle Eastern nationality), and 4 others - people of the same potential or real citizenship of one Middle Eastern state, 2 of whom obviously had its citizenship (because spoke "Hebrew").


Could be a similar cocktail of doctors created "casually"? Who knows? But - if not, - whether that team of doctors which have been picked up by someone intentionally - might ease my suffering? And whether the collision with such a "casual" team has casually resulted in falsification of the facts of the car accident, of the sabotage of diagnostics (including the refusal of the ultrasound test!) and of medical care, and of the signs of an obvious mockery of doctor Gershkovich (Gershkovits)?


Even if 1 or the 2 of these 5 medics appeared normal people (with an adequate conscience and not corrupted professional responsibility), the very presence of this "indirect" or "direct" citizenship put them in obviously more difficult position concerning my particular case, than at its absence. For this reason, not less surprising things open up in the official report of Dr. Rosenberg:


Official report of the doctor Rosenberg. Original.


Reprint in a digital format:

________________________________________


Centre hospitalier de St. - Mary

St.-Mary"s Hospital Center

________________________________________


3830, avenue Lacombe,

Montreal, Quebec, H3T 1M5


Lev Gunin 5 Oct. 2007 FMC - ER


ID: 56-y.o. male


RC: ER FLU box nx of car accident.


HPI: On October 2 was hit by a car -

In ER: no fracture - no compression

syndrome - no deformities.


Now complaining of pain on both legs.

Thinks he has a problem in his leg veins

and is asking to have a Doppler of legs

also copy of his chart.


O/E: Very difficult patient. Very demanding -

asking for various LAB tests. Considers he

has a venoso Thrombosis related to the

accident. Saying he's going to police.

BP: 130x90 both arms. Pulse: 72.


Legs:

Strength: 5/5.

Sensitivity to light touch.

Peripherial pulses (gr. saphenous(?),

tibal, popliteal)

Gout (or Goit?).

ROM of knees and ancles.

1 cm s/cut nodule on lot.

__________________________________

__________________________________


This official report is also not equal to a usual medical report of a polyclinic doctor. By its style, by the meaning, and by the purpose: it is rather a warning for the members of a narrow circle (her colleagues-doctors - (which include and meant direct recommendations in case of patient"s complain).


It is possible to compare this record to a report of more conscientious prison doctor, who suddenly discovered that another one - less conscientious prison doctor - covers up the mockeries of security guards at prisoners and protects prison administration.


Let's imagine that I am a prisoner, and - on forced hard labor works - the driver of an electric loader had deliberately ran me over on the instructions of prison administration. It is clear that prison doctors are not interested in putting the victim (whom their chief would like to see rather in morgue) on feet.


Therefore the 1-st doctor simply "got rid" of the victim. Then the persevering prisoner (understanding that the absence of medical care threatens him by 1 (or both) lover limbs amputation - or death) managed to achieve a medical exam by the 2-nd doctor. Clearly, as the 2-nd doctor has the hands and feet bound by the corporate solidarity and unwritten laws, this doctor cannot break these taboos - and to start treating objectionable person (victim). Therefore such doctor first creates an "alibi" for himself / herself (to be insured from a revenge of criminal colleagues, administration and intelligence services) - and makes a special report: not for helping the patient, but only for the "internal consumption", that is - to warn ER and the hospital administration about plans of the patient, and, in particular, that the patient can demand a criminal investigation of the accident, and then it will be revealed that the chief of prison instigated the driver whom he sent to hit the objectionable person.


In our imagined situation no one of prison"s staff - involved in mockeries and tortures of prisoners - by no means can allow the criminal investigation to highlight the name of the driver, the circumstances of the accident, and the name of the prison"s chef, who instigated the driver.


Probably, because of the circumstances similar to invented by us - doctor Rosenberg writes that, allegedly, her colleagues in ER concluded that "there is no compression syndrome" though in the conclusion of doctor Gershkovich (Gershkovits) only "the compartment syndrome" is rules out.


Particularly about this syndrome (about the compression syndrome) [that - when changing the body position from horizontal to vertical - I am penetrated by sharp, intolerable pain in the damaged right leg"s vein] - I complained most of all to both Dr. Gershkovich (Gershkovits), and to Dr. Rosenberg.


Possibly, the role of the above characterized "alibi" (in her official report) - play some kind of instructions for ER: what steps should be undertaken to cover up the driver and the car (which hit their patient)...


Perhaps, this is why a half of the text of Dr. Rosenberg"s official report has almost nothing in common with a medical document that: "(...) demands an ultrasound (...) and also copy of his patient's records (...) a very difficult patient. Too persevering (...) Threatens to go to police".


But whether had Dr. Rosenberg the right - in general - to interfere with the legal matters, which have arisen after the accident between me - and the driver of the car, and to disclose in a special medical file my intention to go to police concerning the accident? And whether this is not a violation of all conceivable and inconceivable laws and rules concerning the confidentiality and nondisclosure of data, concerning patients? And, in general, was it Rosenberg"s business: whether will I declare to the police the details of the accident and my complaint about the driver?! (I asked from Dr. Rosenberg a reference "for police" about my injuries. She immediately considerably changed countenance, began to dissuade me from filing of application to police, and refused the reference). [I had absolutely no conflict with Dr. Rosenberg; neither a dispute, nor hard words exchange. The conversation has passed very quietly, and Dr. Rosenberg lovely smiled.]


But even this - is not the juiciest. Connecting in the same one paragraph under a sign "O/E:" ("an addition": note for medics) all "not medical" remarks, doctor Rosenberg puts me as though "beyond the law", pushing me on a black list and forming an artificially notorious extremely negative attitude of medics towards me, and - falsely and illegally - combines (and moves) in one semantic row "demands" - "demands" - "an extremely difficult patient" - "too persevering" - "threatens to go to police": where the warning to other medics that the patient "threatens to go to police", is delivered so ambiguously as though means that the patient threatens to go to police with a complain on doctors!!!


This leads to a lawful question: who is the driver of the car which hit me for the doctors of St.-Mary"s hospital with a "potential" or "direct" citizenship of one small foreign state: a relative, a acquaintance, a colleague doctor, a colleague on some of their organizations, one of the members of congregation visited by them, or a son of their high-ranking functionary?


Certainly, in the latter case employees of ER of all hospitals where I could turn to after the accident would be warned, and - theoretically - there are only 3 of them.


I see a contradiction also in the denial of the compression syndrome in the combination with the simultaneous ascertaining "painful sensitivity even to a light touch" and a post-traumatic peripheral pulsation of several veins.


Doctor Rosenberg quotes my words about the suspicion of the post-traumatic thrombosis -

thus without making any comments on my statement, without confirming or ruling out the legitimacy of my self-diagnosis.


What would do a more conscientious or more careful and cunning (but, however, naive politically and not tempted in criminal intrigues) prison doctor, who does not want to be involved into a cover-up and med. care denial, which is life-threatens to her patient, and, in the same time, wants not to present herself for her colleagues and supervisors as a "traitor"?


Most likely, she would try to convince a criminal group of doctors-murderers that their arts will reach "to the very top", and if they kill the victim: they "will be in troubles".


We can see it in the official report of the Dr. Rosenberg. But it is only an assumption-insinuation. Without knowing authentically how this vicious system of concealment works and what are the involved independent mechanisms, I cannot tell with the confidence what actions of Dr. Rosenberg can be interpreted exactly so. But, after all, despite the doubtful - equally from the legal, from the moral, and from the medical ethic"s perspective - entries in her official report, she, probably, resolved her presumable internal moral dispute in favor of the patient.


It is very uncertain, but, still, possible, that this doctor has developed mature views there and then, when, after the horrors of the Second World War, a generation with a relative moral responsibility was brought up. If it is so, the behavior of her colleagues had to shock her, despite all the circumstances and all her efforts to blacken up the patient in her internal dialogue...


In this context - we will ponder what she meant under a maxim "Very difficult patient".


For whom and why - "difficult"? What does it mean? And it means that I still continued to demand persistently and quietly the reference which should adequately reflect the seriousness of my injuries whereas apparently it was very strictly forbidden to emergency doctors and doctors of the policlinic to ascertain them in medical documents...


I was such a "very difficult" and "too persevering" patient because did not give up without a fight to a perspective to remain a disabled person or to die.


Doctor Rosenberg - apparently - understood - already in the course of drawing up the official report - that the higher described method of deceiving description "will not pass". From here are 2 as though absolutely contrast "half" of her resume.


From the point of view of criminal doctors and those who hide behind them - no choice was left to doctor Rosenberg after what wrote her colleagues - the triage nurse and doctor Gershkovich (Gershkovits). Therefore (as it is possible to assume) an appointment was arranged for me with her (instead of with any other doctor).


It could be evident that she fulfilled all their expectations is not the 2nd page of her report which as though was written by another doctor and person:

"A/P: R/O Superficial vein Thrombosis.


Patient referred to ER for assessment

and recommended 2 of Doppler".


Whatever principles or considerations of Dr. Rosenberg differed radically from the same qualities of doctor Gershkovich (Gershkovits), but how to understand the result of her exam if not as "I do not know what is your interest to cover-up the driver, and who is screening you, but I do not play your games". Or: "screen the driver - please, but to provoke patient"s death or amputation: it is an exceeding".


On the other hand, doctor Rosenberg did not have enough courage or the right to go further, having directed me for an "independent" ultrasound procedure which I could pass in another hospital or at any Center of medical radiology.


Probably that when she were writing out a referral to ER for me - with which I went back to ER, - doctor Rosenberg estimated the monstrous situation even more soberly, and made this 2-nd document even more resolutely and sharply, having written:

__________________________________

Centre Hospitalier de St.-Mary"s

3830 avenue Lacombe,

Montreal, Quebec, H3T 1M5


Medicine Familiale

Hopital St. - Mary's

Rapport de Consultation


Consultation avec Dr. - Reffered to GD (General Doctor) (!)

Demande par ..... (?)


Oct. 5, 2007


56-years-old was hit by car 2 days ago

seen in Emergency FMC F/V

c/o pain on right leg + calf tenderness

thinks he has a DVT R/O

superficial vein Thrombosis

Please Assess (!)

__________________________________


It is not required neither experience, nor super-intellectual quality to notice a singularity of this document where nor the name of the doctor (instead of which it is written: "recommended doctor"), neither who requested the consultation, nor who (what doctor) made the document was just omitted. An extraordinary exclamation at the end - "Please, assess" - as though the profession of doctors does not oblige to help (to perform the examination, and to diagnose the injuries from the road accident)!


But even the official report of Dr. Rosenberg is eclipsed by the record made by another triage nurse (to whom I got after Dr. Rosenberg, having again limped to the department of ER of the same hospital of St.-Mary"s.

After all above provided documents and the "contrast" (black-white) official report of Dr. Rosenberg, apparently, nothing can surprise more, and, still, nevertheless, the record of the triage nurse (October 5, 2007, 18.10 evenings) is just stunning again.


Everything in the column OBSERVATIONS SUBJECTIVES / SUBJECTIVE DATE - in principle - is merely copied from the official report of Dr. Rosenberg: in defiance of every possible instructions and rules.


And the column OBSERVATIONS OBJECTIVES / OBJECTIVE DATE - it is empty at all!


How many personal and others medical documents I have seen, but SUCH a twisted report I did not see anywhere and never. There is NOTHING more in the form, filled by the triage nurse that day, ABSOLUTELY NOTHING!


The form filled by the triage nurse on October 5, 2007.


But still a bigger bewilderment causes another document from ER for the same date - October 5, 2007 (which I managed to pick out from the medical archive of St.-Mary"s hospital considerably later). (As it is already known from the previous narration - I went directly to ER from hospital"s out patience (from the doctor Rosenberg).


The "Miracles" begin at once in the top part of this document, where in the column "Responsabilite du paiment "MSSS sans accident" (a road accident without a traumatic accident or material damage), whereas in all previous ER documents (from October 3, 2007) in the same column appeared: "MSSS avec accident" (a road accident with injuries [accident] and material damage - Fr.).


The name of this column is translated as "financial responsibility": so, maybe, the sabotage of the diagnostics and of rendering of medical care, and the replacement of "MSSS avec accident" by "MSSS sans accident" are connected to the screening and covering up the driver? And, if so, this provokes a natural question: who is the driver? a son of an MP, or a police chef"s son; a deputy, a major, or an important military engineer; a Zionist cone, or a doctor; and, this is why the "services" and the medical doctors created "miracles"?


And, by the way, this document was signed by someone by name of Sivaraman Sujith Krishna. (Let"s return to this "miracle" later.)


I was telling the triage nurses and the doctors that my bike was damage, that my personal things were damaged (which is dramatic in my socioeconomic situation), and my clothes were torn. So, even if by "MSSS sans accident" they meant an accident without the material damage (not meaning "without injuries"): it was a lie and a falsification all the same. And - if their duty was to register my declaration on the material damage, - they sabotaged it, too.


In the column "Reseignements Supplementaires" MVA-pain RT Leg appears, ignoring my complaints about the pain in BOTH legs-feet and in a contradiction to all other documents 2 (3) - on October 5, 2007 where Both the LEFT, and the RIGHT legs were mentioned.


Moreover, on the back of the same page it is specified "BOTH legs pain": so, which side to trust?!


At the same time, in the column "the final diagnosis" it is entered by hand "(...) DVT" [Deep Venous Thrombosis] - thrombosis of deep veins is illegible), and in the document section "follow-ups": "yes", "no": it is not specified anything, except of the referral to the ultrasound test.


Moreover, something is entered in one of the lines of this section, but crossed out that obviously reflects a confusion and puzzlement of someone, who was filling out the document. And it, in turn, indicates an extraordinary situation.


The incredibility of this situation especially emphasizes also that with the diagnosis "thrombosis of deep veins" (!!!) the patient was "threw out to the street" - NOT UNDER SUPERVISION of DOCTORS, and with NO FOLLOW-UPS.


Such a diagnosis indicates an IMMEDIATE HOSPITALIZATION, and in my case I was not hospitalized, but - in general - kicked out from the ER, even without the follow-ups!


Not less wild things open in the requisites of the same document.


In St.-Mary"s ER I was examined by Dr. Paraskevopulos (as I suggest - probably a Greek Jew by origin), already familiar to me on last visits to the same ER. (She agreed to send me to the ultrasound test, but only next day).


However, in the column "Médecin ou service" the name Sivaraman Sujith Krishna appears.


It turns out that the doctor with the Greek surname - Paraskevopoulos - examined me, but in the documents specified a Hindu name Sivaraman Sudzhit Krishna - whom I never saw by my eyes! [Retrospectively modeling the situation, it is possible to assume, that Mr. Sivaraman Sujith Krishna - unknown to me, - probably, was present during that moment at ER, and, not excluded, even looked into the room (but whether who can take a glance?). But, certainly, it was Dr. Paraskevopoulos, who examined me! And she was the only doctor in the room.]


It is clear, that, having standing face to face with the position imposed to her, and before an unsoluble moral dilemma, doctor Paraskevopoulos decided to escape this situation by means of the figurehead, having used the trainee intern, a young (as we can suggest) doctor Sivaraman Sudzhit Krishna, as a lightning rod. She framed up the probationer and washed her hands, as Pontius Pilate.


Nevertheless, contrary to Pilate, she nonetheless offered a helping hand to the crucified: channelizing on the ultrasound. And good deeds - as was already noticed long ago, - do not pass unpunished, that is why, despite all wishes of madam Paraskevopulos to leave the water dry, she after all made a mistake, and her name "was lit" in the ultrasound requisition, not accompanied by names like Krishna.


All these facts incontestably testify about a monstrous pressure rendered on doctors (not to mention the younger medical personnel), so that doctors Rosenberg and Paraskevopulos (whatever were their motivations) had to find enough courage to go even on such insignificant divergences with their colleagues-collaborators.


In the column "arrival to ER" is specified the time of my arrival from policlinic - 16:35; time of examination by the doctor - 20:10 (also corrected there; actually I was seen by the doctor not at 20.10, but at 20.00).


Totally - altogether - I spent more than 22 hours in the hospital, waiting for doctors and tests, and did not ate or drink.


One more curious detail: doctor Sivaraman Krishna"s signature is merely a "birdie" [<] - and nothing else.


Considering all other "focuses", we will ask a question: is it his usual signature, or it was only for my case (for my medical file)?


Curiously also that in the ER was used the form (formulary) URGENCE - CONSULTATION EXTERNE - DOMICILE (Emergency Room, "external" consultation ", domicile patient).


On the back of this page (in the column "time and date") the first record - the indication of time - was corrected, too. Age of the patient - again 51 years.


______________________________

"-Hit by car... (...) legs 2 (corrected on "3") days ago.

- Seen here 2 days ago (further - illegible)

- (All line is unreadable).

- Worried about DVT".

Further - listing of drugs which are usually taken by the patient. Further - it is again illegible; if I am not mistaken: expected methods of medical diagnostic radiology (for example - here are listed: US [apparently means Ultrasound - ultrasonography], etc.).


Next:


"Bilateral calves:

Right Calf - tender, hard gastrocnemius.

Left calf - tender, illegibly) soleus".


Leg:


(nothing can be disassembled)


Movable [illegibly]) haematomas.

Doppler [illegibly]).

______________________________


1. Thus, this official report was not only filled out by another doctor with another surname - instead of the doctor who really examined me, - but was also deliberately made a scribble [ESPECIALLY illegible]: so that EVERYTHING could understand ONLY the employees of the same ER who know the "conventional signs" of each other.


2. Doctor Krishna refused to sign the report (because a "birdie" [<] is not a signature), or the report was filled out by somebody else.


3. Too many inscription were crossed over or corrected, which is unusual in Canada, with the Canadian bureaucratic particularity.


4. My age was marked incorrectly again.


5. Doctor Paraskevopoulos examined me ONLY 6 MINUTES, which is amazing in itself, especially considering the fact that I spent around 22 hours (!) in the hospital.


And there are more very questionable things about the events and about the medical reports.


All these 5 points + other facts justify the presentation of next additional information.


SPECIAL ADDITION

ABOUT POSSIBLE COMMUNICATIONS

AND the CONFLICT of INTERESTS of

EMERGENCY DOCTORS

of St. - Mary's HOSPITAL

KRISSI PARASKEVOPOULOS,

Stephen GERSHKOVICH,

and Deborah SILVERBERG-FAYNSTEIN (Faynston).


[There is no guarantee that ALL the underwritten data (or even most of it) is true. Specific sources of different degree of reliability could not guarantee the accuracy of information by definition. Each of the mentioned below facts should be considered as the working "hypothesis", which need a confirmation. It is not with my possibilities and resources to receive a "100 percent" confirmation.

Nevertheless, if there is at least a small chance of reliability of just a small portion of the provided data, it would be a mistake not to present it].


1. A neurologist, doctor David Silverberg [this surname in Yiddish is translated from German Jewish language as the Silver Mountain and represents "a disfigured version" - with an anglicism - of the Jewish surname Zilberberg - Silberberg] from Charlottetown (district of Toronto), is, probably, a relative of well-known neurologist (the same origin), Stephen Gershkovich (Gerskovits). [We must warn at once that this information can be a) incorrect; b) or not easy to confirm.]


2. In turn, a well-known neurologist - doctor Stephen Gerskovits - is a relative of his full namesake, doctor Stephen Gerskovits (Gershkovich) from Montreal, the doctor in St-Mary's hospital ER. [We must warn at once that this information can be a) incorrect; b) or not easy to confirm.]


3. Doctor Stephen Gerskovits and doctor Krissie Paraskevopoulos, doctors in St-Mary's hospital ER, played a role (according to an unconfirmed data) of advisers for the American professional medical body of New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY, within the researches on eyes injury by microwave radiation. (Their role was to verify the correctness of the data from the epidemiology statistics). Doctors-researchers of the same origin, such as J. D. Paz, A. Atkin, and a number of others, also wrote about the risks of eyes injury by microwave radiation. The microwave radiation can lead to eyes injury of various degree, INCLUDING the Vitreous Body Detachment, GLAUCOMA and CATARACT. These researches quite could be used by military departments, for the military purposes. [Since 2005, I am complaining about a possible exposure to a distantly-directed microwave radiation, due to 3 inexplicable vertigos, with such complications as the eyes and ears injuries.]


4. Doctor Deborah Silberberg-Feinstein (Faynston) [Dr. Debra Silberberg-Finestone] - is another doctor of St-Mary's hospital. According to an unconfirmed information - beside the medicine, she studied (in Concordia and McGill) the methods of the internal security of financial and medical institutions, and supervision of over their employees. She also (if this data is true) worked in the same area before becoming a doctor. According to other information, doctor Deborah Silberberg-Faynston: a therapist ("a family doctor") with private practice, and, from the point of view of certain doctors and experts in medical ethics, her work at ER is unethical and represents the conflict of interests. I did not manage to find any "traces" of madam Deborah Silberberg-Faynston in the listing of the staff of ER at St-Mary's, and - in general - her status in this ER is represented indefinable and strange. And it seems that she works "in pair" with doctor Chrissie Paraskevopoulos to whom she is "attributed" and whom she replaces or "duplicates".


5. In turn, doctor Chrissie Iris Paraskevopoulos, the MD CCFP EM - as well as doctor Stephen Gerskovits (Gershkovich): is an important official from medicine (kind of a bureaucrat), not just simply a doctor - with huge connections and an involvement into the affairs of the Canadian Federal authorities. Doctor Paraskevopoulos - is the board member of the Canadian Association of ER Doctors (Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians - CAEP). According to obtained information, on votes in this council she supports doctor Rebeccah Rosenblum from Edmonton (by the rumors: a representative of the interests of foreign countries). Rebeccah Rosenblum is in very friendly relations with Chrissie Paraskevopulos. Also due to the rumors, the last one - is a stout namesake and relative of the glorified Canadian actress from Toronto - Chrissie Paraskevopoulos known by the films like "My Big Fat Greek Wedding" (2002), "ER" (1994) and "The Division" (2001). Whether casually the biggest popularity was brought to this actress by her role in the film ER (Emergency Room)?


6. As well as doctor Stephen Gerskovits (Gershkovich) who was the owner (or owning to the day) of a corporation (specializing on laboratory services and equipment for medical laboratories), Chrissie Iris Paraskevopoulos - owns Geston corporation C. Paraskevopoulos M.D. INC. (exists since November, 2010). This company is registered as an office of the "general" doctors (therapists). [Which is also may be a conflict of interests in innumerous areas.]


7. Doctor Paraskevopoulos and doctor Silberberg-Faynston are in the friendly relations with doctor Benjamin Zion Schiff, by rumors - a relative of the well-known banking and Zionist dynasty.


8. Doctor Chrissie Paraskevopoulos - a secretary of Council of Doctors, Dentists and Pharmacologists of St.-Mary's hospital; later - the 1st vice-chairman of this Council.


9. Doctor Chrissie Iris Paraskevopoulos, seemingly, got over to Montreal from Ottawa where in 1991 became the member of The College of Family Physicians of Canada. Her primary and main specialization: therapist (the "family" doctor). The same year she - at McGill university - became a participant of the program "family medicine" (i.e. district doctors, therapists): Community-Oriented Primary Care, McGill Family Medicine Research Project. Within this research project she - it seems - wrote 2 or 3 "theses" (university works).


10. In 2002-2003 doctor Chrissie Paraskevopoulos worked in the Jewish General City hospital of Montreal as the therapist (the "family" doctor), in the relevant office. It is important to emphasize that BEFORE her work in the Jewish General Hospital she could not break through anywhere to any important and responsible work, and did not occupy any responsible public, administrative and medical posts.


11. At the beginning of 2015 doctor Chrissie Paraskevopoulos headed (as the chairman) the Commission for Appointing the Chief Physician to the office of Oncology of St.-Mary"s hospital.


12. Several times I received positive comments on madam Chrissie Paraskevopoulos. If not doctor Rosenberg and not doctor Paraskevopoulos, I would not obtain the referral to the ultrasound test, and in other hospitals there would be the same.


I am in a debt to these two women at least that - with their help, learned (not completely, but, still), what blood vessels injuries cause the road accident. If not this knowledge (which confirmed some of my assumptions), I could not pick up an adequate self-treatment, and the consequences could be even more unfortunate. On the other hand, the above-stated 12 points tell a lot of things, which give the food for reflections about why after doctors Gershkovich and Rosenberg I was seen by doctor Paraskevopoulos.


Finishing their studies, capable and perspective doctors are doomed to low-paid, unbearable work as the district ("family") doctor in one of the most primitive and second-grade walk-in clinics. A poor situation, very small examination rooms, narrow corridors, always overcrowded lines of chairs, and all newly and newly coming people whom will not contain these lines of chairs, or even the whole policlinic; a permanent risk to catch NOT ONLY a flu (from patients); eternal congestion and work for 60 hours per week; and the compelled communication exclusively with the patients from the lowest social classes and with the poorest, unfortunate immigrants-refugees from unsuccessful countries... Such a doctor is threatened by a needy existence, a depression or even a psychiatric disease, and full hopelessness.


As soon as you get to this meat grinder - you are, probably, already doomed to have no chances for opening your private office or to get at least a position of a therapist in a decent clinic. And then - unexpectedly - you are taken to an exclusive research program in the most prestigious university of McGill; then - to a well-equipped, spacious and smart policlinic in the Jewish hospital. And you are not capable not to be in a debt to these who pulled you out from the shit... And your work at the Jewish General hospital was a test on loyalty and checkout of your views, beliefs, judgments, and ideas. And, certainly, you are paid much more, than in a walk-in clinic, say, on Guy Street between Rene-Levesque and Saint-Catherine.


Then those to whom you showed the loyalty, push you on hard, but interesting, creative, and even higher paid work in ER of one of the best Montreal hospitals. They push you into such influential and prestigious organization, as the Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians (CAEP). And not somewhere, but directly to the Board of Directors! You got help and advices (and not only!.) for opening your own medical business, though it ethically (and, probably, legally) - the conflict of interests. But now you cannot refuse them if they ask you sometimes about some "very small", politically motivated services... Whether not therefore doctor Silberberg (Zilberberg)-Faynston (Feinstein) gives out herself (as I suspect) for doctor Paraskevopoulos if it is requested by her "chiefs"?


But even in this foul place doctor Paraskevopoulos did not cease to resist, and in October, 2007, made a small, but a favor for me, having put the "special agent" Stephen Gershkovich and his chiefs in a difficult situation. Whether it is casual that after October, 2007, I was never allowed to approach Dr. Chrissie Paraskevopoulos, as they say, on a gun shot?! (I was never seen by her any more for years).


All these events with the car accident and the medics" involvement into screening and covering-up the driver, and sabotaging the elementary diagnostic procedures and medical treatment for the most essential medical care in connection with damaged blood vessels - opens so many secrets and "undercurrents", such (hidden from human eyes) mechanisms of repressions, egoism and corruption as can not open something else.


CHAPTER 5


OCTOBER 6 2007


[06 Oct. 2007: 11.15 - arrival in hospital by a taxi.


06 Oct. 2007: 12.25 - record in registry of


06 Oct. 2007: 15.02 - only at this time got on ultrasonography


06 Oct. 2007: 15.25 - ultrasonography procedure


06 Oct ended. 2007: 16.00-left home by a taxi]


================


This is how it was recorded in my notes. But this chronology causes too many questions. Probably, I wrote down something oddly and incorrectly noted the time (no wonder in my condition and situation of that time), or - again - the medics irreparably confused something (again!).


As a result of a number of comparisons and investigations, I came to a conclusion that the time of my arrival to the hospital and the time of the ultrasound test was - most likely - specified

wrongly by me, and in medical documents - was not true.


Otherwise we deal with especially malicious and improbable juggling in medical documents, though this possibility theoretically cannot be excluded finally.


So, next day, on Saturday, October 6, 2007, - with enormous difficulties and intolerable pain, and limping - I came into the same hospital for an ultrasound test.


If hospital"s chronology is correct, and my chronology is wrong, than, judging by indirect data, I should arrive there not earlier, but also not later then 8:55 - 9:15 in the mornings.


On October 6, 2007 - while I was in hospital - I called the police, and reported about the accident (about how exactly the car hit me), dictated the numbers of car"s plate license and the description of how the driver looked, and demanded to find the driver and to investigate out the degree of his mischief. But nobody never called, or came, or contacted me from police.


I was "pickled" in the medical imaging waiting room on the 3-rd (2-nd) floor suspiciously long, despite severe pain and serious traumas. I paid attention that almost everyone, who came after me - was called to the examination rooms or to a medical procedures, except of me.


It seemed like a special medical worker suitable for the mission of blasting my health was personally prepared for me, and they waited for this worker "to take care of me".


Trying to reduce the waiting time, I went to the procedural "compartment" where intended to ask somebody to let me pass out of my turn (considering severe pain). Now, I do not remember precisely, but I think, that exactly there I entered into a toilet to rinse my hands, and, standing behind a barefaced door, unexpectedly heard a scrap of conversation of 2 doctors or 2 male radiologists, and from the words which I caught I understood that a radiologist from the Jewish General hospital was invited for one of patients to make and read the ultrasound test, and that it will be Karl Blum or Liliental (I am not sure about the 2nd surname; it be: Levental).


In my usual condition I would not pay attention to extraneous conversation of physicians and would not disassemble the words. But by then my attention and all feelings were sharpened, and my hearing snatched out this phrase from the surrounding by "itself".


I limped immediately to the registry, and demanded, that the procedure should be carried out by a technician of St.-Mary"s hospital, and interpreted into a report also by the local (from this hospital) doctor-radiologist. I also added that if the ultrasound will be suddenly carried out by a technician and an experts from another hospital - I do not give my consent.


Right there appeared 2 more medical workers, and then 1 more medic approached. All of them exchanged the glances, responded nothing at first, then left somewhere to find out something, and, then, declared to me that my blood vessels will scan "the best specialist" - Michael.


While he did the ultrasound, I thought - 2 or 3 times - that will faint from pain. When he pressed the detector to the sick leg, the pain spasm literally went off scale.


But I was surprised that he scans through only the right leg. I asked him - what with the left leg? He answered that cannot scan the second leg without a referral doctor, and that the requisite specified: only the right leg.


Even more scandalous and even ominous were "Michael's" inquiries (while he did the ultrasound test), whether I had thrombosis in the past (before the accident on October 2, 2007).


I don"t remind that such inquiries - are a prerogative of the doctor, and that on the background of the injuries just happened as a result of the car accident - they are not ethic, and not pertinent.


"Michael" was - besides - out of place persevering and annoying.


Even after my refutation, when I categorically declared that never (before the accident) had any problems with the veins and even with the capillaries, he, having represented mistrust, told: "Perhaps, you simply do not know?"


From this I drew a conclusion that someone (may be, very shortly, in brief, but, nevertheless) - carefully instructed him on this subject - and that this "someone" was very interested to present the situation so, that, allegedly, the thrombosis is not connected with the car accident.


This produce a justifiable suspicion that an expert who deciphered the ultrasonography data, COULD try to "soften" the conclusions-results (the report summary) at the desire of the colleagues-doctors and (or) "non-doctors ", without having mentioned more serious (than ONLY the thrombosis of the superficial veins) vascular damages. The ultrasound report - the unique official document which has confirmed (in peak to false conclusions of doctors and other medics) my own statements about the injuries on October 2, 2007, and proved that their heaviness should be considered incommensurably more seriously (than nurses and doctors criminally tried to present) - was probably "censored" almost in the same way as fake tuberculosis and fake heart and kidney insufficiency reports generated by Immigration in 1999 - 2003 (see the Book 1).


However, there almost no doubts, that a considerable pressure was put upon "Michael" and the doctor-radiologist from Stephen Gershkovich (Gershkovits) and other influential forces and persons, and that they heroically defended the conclusions (summary) of the ultrasound test, having put Gershkovich and К* in awkward position.


But what, if a strict taboo was depicted for them in advance, which obviously laid down severe constraints: THIS (pseudo-aneurism +...) not to specify CATEGORICALLY? And they were warned that if they break THIS ban, then the whole their official report in general will not go anywhere and will be destroyed. So, what, if these two could do nothing? What - if the official ultrasound report was made by someone in advance, and the doctor-radiologist needed just to sign it? Certainly, he did not signed the forgery prepared by someone, because otherwise the report"s conclusions would not resulted about thrombosis... But the very existence of such an already prepared official report and of the 2-3 "indestructible" taboo could decisively accelerate the emergence of the report, having provoked some kind of a "record" of the speed of ultrasound"s interpretation. Then the radiologists could not be blamed, but, on the other hand, our suspicions are not groundless.


Not casually, despite of all my persevering demands and repeated requests to different doctors (and demands during the ultrasound test) - they refused to scan my left foot by "Doppler".


It is possible to assume that doctor Stephen Gershkovich (Gershkovits), an high-class expert, realized the potential post-traumatic problems with the left leg as not less serious than with the right (despite more severe pain and damage in the right leg) - and blocked all possibilities of an ultrasound test of the left leg.


And now we will pass to the facts and conclusions. A considerable part of them - it is quite probable - can be erroneous or even odious; only a medical expert who is well familiar not only with the procedure and with the interpretation of ultrasound test, but also with the differences of the administrating of this particular hospital and with the procedures carried out here - is capable to "judge".


When a professor from France, a vascular surgeon on pension (whom I contacted on Internet), received from me the detailed description of symptoms and a copy of ultrasound reports and blood tests, he drew a conclusion that - for 100 percent - I have a pseudo-aneurism (injury of a vein with bleeding), and also - is not excluded - a venous and arterial fistula.


It is quite possible that this ultrasound allowed to "see" both pseudo-aneurism, and a fistula, but these data parts were simply "threw out" from the official report.


But if - at the stage of the interpretation of data (of this ultrasound) - was deliberately hid a combination of pseudo-aneurism (and, besides, it is impossible to exclude completely also a fistula) with the thrombosis of deep and superficial veins: thereby they hid a serious condition, which needed an immediate intensive treatment and hospitalization.


After this procedure I received, at last, at least one paper - but only as a result of my persevering demands. Besides, the document was handwritten, not clear, and the handwriting was almost illegible; so, I needed a considerable smartness to decipher it (see below):


The official report of the ultrasound vascular test [right leg] (Doppler) on October 6, 2007; 1-st image (on the left): the document issued to me right after the ultrasound test. The 2-nd image (right side) - the same document (another copy) - received from the archive.


Its text:


____________________________________________

St. - Mary"s Hospital Center

3830, avenue Lacombe, Montreal, Quebec, H3T 1M5


Ultrasound


Gunin, Lev 06/10/2007 11:22 Age 51

Ref: Paraskevopoulos

Provenance: ER - Emergency Department


06/10/2007 DOPPLER PERIPHERIAL VENOS

STUDIES & DUPLEX


REPORT


Haematoma in medial gastrocnemius muscle

LATENT CFV, SFV, Poplital in deep calf vein

Thrombus in Great Saphenous vein

from mid calf to mid thigh


____________________________________________


It is clear that the doctor who has directed me to the ultrasound test - was Chrissie Iris Paraskevopoulos, NOT Sivaraman Sujith Krishna!


Miracles?!


One more discrepancy: the time in the ultrasound report is specified 11:22, and the time of my arrival to ER (already with THIS result in hands) - 11:15. But I received this document not later then 11:00 - at the best (after all: to reach from radiology to ER in the huge hospital - it takes time!).


Then the result had to appear later, than its paper copy was given to me?! A nonsense!


There is another question: if doctor"s name, and even the time were forged - whether it is possible to trust the ultrasound"s interpretation?


Though we"ll continue to adhere to the version that the time 11:22 notes the completion of the ultrasound procedure, I will add that since the beginning of 2008 I was always sure that the time of the arrival to the hospital - 11:15 - is not subjected to doubts. To verify it, I approached to the public phone, lifted the receiver (then the time is a being "jumps out" on the shone board), and photographed a running electronic line. This picture remained.


Judging by it, I was in one of the corridors of the 1-st (ground) floor at 11:15.


Now let"s assume that in 3-4 weeks later, when I began to rewrite the initial notes and facts to the chronicle of events, my memory gave "failure" (due to the whole chain of stressful situations) - and that actually the photo of being shone time digits was made not on my arrival to the hospital, but after the ultrasound procedure: to note the end of the ultrasonography. It could be literally on an entrance to ER or even inside (where there were public phones) where I limped after the ultrasound, having the ultrasound report on hands.


In the documents from ER is noted that I appeared there just at 11.15.


In the ultrasound report the time is indicated as 11:22, but it is not specified - what it notes. There are only 2 options: this was the time of the end of the procedure or the time of the data interpretation completion and official report drawing up (or the time of the completion of procedure and the moment when the official report was ready - they "combined").


The reference with the result of the ultrasound report I received right after the completion of the procedure (and I wrote it down immediately).


The triage nurse noted at 12:25 that the result of the ultrasound test is ready, and that it is possible to see it in my computer's patient's records. Under a condition of the reliability of hospital's chronology - it was not enough time for the ultrasound interpretation in any case.


Let's say that (on hospital chronology) at 11:22 I already passed the ultrasound procedure and received the official report on hands. But after all the report could not be "magically" transferred to my hands and in my patient's computer records.


According to all the manuals and information available to me, the procedure of vascular ultrasound Double Doppler of a lower limb takes about 30-40 minutes. The time can be even longer if there is a suspicion of the thrombosis of deep veins. And this is on situation for 2014-2015. In 2007, according to other sources, the ultrasound Double Doppler was performed for 10-20 minutes more longer, than today. Then there is a preparation time (in 2007, in this hospital, patients had to undress and change clothes for this kind of scan in the ultrasound room), accommodation at the medical couch, etc. Summarizing the calculations, we receive - with great reserve - an hour, or, at least 40-45 minutes.


But there is one more circumstance.


I remember very well (the same reflect my notes made at that time) that in the ultrasound room I did not begin to unwind at once the bandage on the right leg (since wanted to wait for medics and to do it at their presence), and it should extend the procedure time at least for 5-7 minutes.


Probably, for the same reason (after the ultrasound test I again reeled up an elastic bandage on the right leg, without which could not do a single step), and for 5-7 minutes the ultrasound interpretation was delayed again.


Besides, I was told that a doctor is probably going to come into the room to do some of the scan personally, and waited another 10-15 minutes, but the doctor finally did not come.


Let's add to it the time necessary for drawing up - on the basis of decoding - the official report, its writing and copying of this document for me. The official report (the result of the ultrasonography) was issued to me for its transfer to ER (where I went right away (to the 1-st floor from the 3rd, or, on Canadian terminology, from the 2-nd floor to "zero").


While limped there (it was impossible to step on the right foot), I needed not less than 10 minutes: it at the best. If it was necessary to wait for the lift longer (it happens - up to 10 minutes), I appeared in ER only in 20 (!) minutes after the completion of the ultrasound test. It was - according to official papers - at 11:15.


According to triage nurse"s notes - I appeared in her room at 12:25, i.e. slightly more than in 1 hour.


And here is what gave the calculations.


The result of ultrasonography could not be given me out later then 10:30.


And I could not get to the ultrasound procedure earlier, than at 9:50, or even at 10:00.


It is hard to believe that this time it appeared to be enough for an adequate ultrasound procedure, interpretation-reading of the received data, drawing up of the official report result and its transfer to my hands.


Here the original document, given out to me in the office of medical radiology (where I passed the ultrasonography):

____________________________________________

St. - Mary"s Hospital Center

3830, avenue Lacombe, Montreal, Quebec, H3T 1M5


Ultrasound


Gunin, Lev 06/10/2007 11:22 Age 51

Ref: Paraskevopoulos

Provenance: ER - Emergency Department


06/10/2007 DOPPLER PERIPHERIAL VENOS

STUDIES & DUPLEX


REPORT


Haematoma in medial gastrocnemius muscle

LATENT CFV, SFV, Poplital in deep calf vein

Thrombus in Great Saphenous vein

from mid calf to mid thigh

____________________________________________


Later, when I managed to obtain the documents from ER"s in the medical archive, the same document, but now with a "header" over the original, reflecting the fax submission - was found.


It is possible to assume that someone realized an error of handing over to me the official ultrasound report "too early", and fabricated sending it by fax to ER later.


Or they bethink suddenly in 1 hour, and sent a copy of the document (issued to me) from radiology office to ER by fax: as though the result of the interpretation (the report) was ready not at 11:22, but at 12:34.


Therefore they did not print out it from the computer system, where all the data could be entered in 3 minutes (what can be simpler!) but sent a fax.


After all - this time in the listing from the hospital computer network would not be reflected, but in the fax listing report it is present. Only that the unfortunate conspirators "made a mistake" again, without having considered all the details and circumstances: in the official report of the triage nurse, at 12:25, it is told that the result of the ultrasonography for October 6, 2007 is ready and available by now (that is - was at least in 10 minutes prior to this official report if we trust the fax's time) in my patient's records, and the fax arrived at 12:34, and while its listing would be delivered, printed out, and added in the folder of my medical chart documents, it would pass 5-7 additional minutes.


It is absolutely clear from this that the official report of the triage nurse mentioned the copy given out to me, not the document received by fax.


Here, for the comparison, the version of the same document but sent by fax from Radiology to ER:

____________________________________________

06/10/2007 ------ 12:34 ULTRA-SOUND ---> EMERGENCY No. 185


St. - Mary"s Hospital Center

3830, avenue Lacombe, Montreal, Quebec, H3T 1M5


Ultrasound


Gunin, Lev 06/10/2007 11:22 Age 51

Ref: Paraskevopoulos

Provenance: ER - Emergency Department


06/10/2007 DOPPLER PERIPHERIAL VENOS

STUDIES & DUPLEX


REPORT


Haematoma in medial gastrocnemius muscle

PATIENT CFV, SFV, Poplital in deep calf vein

Thrombus in Greate Saphenous vein

from mid calf to mid thigh

____________________________________________


..............................


Almost all my worst suspicions were materialized.


In couple of days at the Network forum I contacted an expert in vascular problems who assured me (after obtaining my diagnosis and symptoms) that in a similar to mine post-traumatic situation the time of diagnostics IS a factor, and that if I was diagnosed during the first 24 hours, the medical care - corresponding to the treatment of post-traumatic blood clots - could provided to me, preventing other vascular complications at once, and guaranteeing a complete recovery and reducing time for it.


Now I will provide the official report of the triage nurse.


The official report of the triage nurse (nurse of an accident ward), on October 6, 2007.


On October 6, 2007 the triage nurse wrote in the form filled up by her (specified time 12:25):


"Patient was seen yesterday in ER (Emergency) of for right calf pain. Patient was hit by a car 3 days ago. Sent by FMS to R/L (Radiology) of for DVT (Deep Veins Thrombosis). Returns today for Doppler, see results in chart".


In the column "Objective supervision" she added the following:


"Alert. + oriented.

Resp. easy.

Skin dry + warm to touch.

No swelling, redness or ^ (high) skin +

temp. noted to calf".


With the interpretation of acronyms of the medical cursive writing:


(Alerted and oriented.

Respires easy.

Skin dry and warm to touch.

No swelling, redness or high skin

temperature noted to calf.)


Whether casually - after receiving the result of the ultrasound - I got not to any other doctor, but again to the same Stephen Gershkovich (Gershkovits)?


There were 2 key moments connected to the injuries received as a result of the road accident:


On October 2-3, 2007 (right after the car hit me), and 6 October 2007 (right after the ultrasound) - and both times I was examined by the same Gershkovich (Gershkovits)!


Coincidently?


Undeniably, there could be discovered 2 very obvious goals of the distortions, falsifications, deception, and manipulations in the medical records at St.-Mary"s hospital, and the sabotage of an appropriate tests, diagnostics and treatment:


1) To do the utmost, for preventing the name and the description of the driver, who hit me, his car"s license plate number, the true facts, circumstances of the accident, the place (where it happened), etc. from appearing anywhere in hospital"s medical papers and in the police data or protocols.

2) To do the utmost, to "underestimate" the gravity of my injuries - and to bring the forged data about, allegedly, an insignificance of the damage caused to my health into the medical protocols.


Any guesses about the possible motivations might be only speculative, and could destroy the trust to this document, however, they are inevitable in the broader sense, because in general there are could be only 4 possible explanations:


a) The accident was a deliberate action (attempt at my life or health): and now someone needed to erase and cover up the traces.


b) The road accident was accidental, but the driver - an important "cone" for someone - should not "be lit" at all - and - consequently - they undertook all possible measures to screen him and to hide him "in a shadow".


c) The accident was accidental and caused by the mutual negligence, but the driver was an agent of Canadian or foreign intelligence services watching me, and the car - the vehicle of the secret services or police, and - not excluded - with replaceable numbers.


d) The accident was accidental, but some interesants did not exclude that some global or foreign "services" took a hand to it, and - on own initiative - began to cover up the traces.


Even before my arrival on October 6, 2007 to St.-Mary"s hospital, I received (on the Internet) the opinions of 3 independent medical experts from 3 different countries who thought that I have a post-traumatic thrombosis of superficial and deep veins with a syndrome of "compartment" (decompression), pseudo-aneurism [a possibility of a venous and arterial fistula was not excluded], and prepared for me (in advance) written questions for such an emergency doctor who will examine me.


Here are my demands (there is a copy of my written list of demands which I handed over to Dr. Gershkovich - at the repeated visit to ER):


1. An antibiotic for the prevention of thrombophlebitis and infection of internal hematomas.


2. Injection of physiological solution.


3. Injection of thrombin.


4. Compression therapy.


5. Bandage.


6. Anticoagulants.


7. More effective pain killers, than Tylenol or anti-inflammatory.


My demands (there is a copy of my written list of demands which I handed over to the radiologist): Please, I asked - to confirm or exclude:


1. A pseudo-aneurism.


2. A venous and arterial fistula / a femoral vein - a femoral artery.


3. Vessel"s leaking (femoral, poplitel, saphenous).


4. Embolization.


5. Blood clots in poplitelny, femoralny and safitelny veins.


So, after the ultrasound test and the triage nurse (October 6, 2007), I again got to doctor Stephen Gershkovich (Steven Herskovitz).


Here the official report of doctor Stephen Gershkovich (Gerskovits), on October 6, 2007. (See below)


The photocopy of Dr. Gerskovits report [2 pages] (6 Oct. 2007).


In the report of doctor Gershkovich (Gershkovits), in the column "Responsabilite de paiement" - it is printed (exactly as in the report of Dr. Sivaraman Sujith Krishna, whose name and signature is a forgery since I was examined not by him, but by doctor Chrissie Paraskevopoulos): "MSSS sans accident".


This leads to a suggestion that the formula "MSSS avec accident" was replaced by the formula "MSSS sans accident" at the initiative of doctor Gershkovich (Gershkovits), or was connected to him.


It proves to be true also because of the fact that doctor Gershkovich (Gershkovits) - a unique person among all other medics (all nurses, doctors and other medics who were dealing with my post-traumatic complications), - had put in question that very fact that I was in general hit by car - as though I invented it!


In the column "Final Diagnosis" doctor Gershkovich (Gershkovits) wrote:


"Thrombotic Superficial Thrombophlebit" (thrombotic thrombophlebitis of superficial veins), thereby in general having called in question the traumatic origin of blood clots. And this was - despite the ultrasound result (report) which COMPLETELY EXCLUDED such a diagnosis and reported about an internal hematoma in the leg"s calf muscle and mentioning not only superficial, but also the deep veins.


Moreover, at the diagnosis "thrombophlebitis" (an inflammation of veins) doctor Gershkovich (Gershkovits) was OBLIGED to issue a course of anti-inflammatory, but did not prescribe ANYTHING, no medications at all.


He also ignored my complaints to such an intolerable pain that could not be managed by "any Tylenol".


Actually - doctor Stephen Gershkovich (Steven Herskovitz) hardly trusted in the diagnosis "thrombophlebitis" and could not trust in it, perfectly understanding that the combination of hematoma in muscles and blood clots, as well as their location: clearly indicates the pure traumatic damage of the blood vessels as a result of an accident, instead of an initial inflammation.


The falsification of the diagnosis had the unique purpose to present the medical problem so as if there was no accident, and my veins, allegedly, inflamed "by themselves", which solely caused the thrombosis (instead of recognizing the traumatic nature of the vascular damage).


Thereby Dr. Gerskovits (Gershkovich) deliberately blocked an eventual police investigation, an opening of a criminal case by police - based on the road accident, - and the investigation of the circumstances of the accident: by presenting the accident as my lie ("invention").


From here it becomes obvious that someone needed to completely "withdraw" (by all means) any information about the new white (or light-color) car 988-PPH, which hit me at the corner of Decarie and Ponsar, and about the car driver - from everywhere.


Not in my capabilities (and not in my situation) to learn, why it was so important for someone, however, based on the description of the events connected with the accident I offer some possible explanations.


At first (6 October 2007) - Dr. Gershkovich (Gershkovits) categorically refused to issue another (a follow-up) ultrasound Double Doppler-Duplex vascular test of my both legs. Only after I threatened to send by fax a written demand to ER, and also to address to the police with a declaration that the St.-Mary"s hospital is covering up the driver of the car - which hit me, and "acts in his interests", he made a compromise.


His persistence on this question is also very clear. After all - if the repeated test shows that the blood clots are gradually resolving without the coagulants (which happens only after the traumatic damage of blood vessels, but hardly possible at acute thrombophlebitis), his version (that supposedly there was no trauma) will fail, and, on the contrary, there will be no doubts about the traumatic origin of the vascular damage.


When I asked him to arrange the ultrasound test not earlier, than in 2 weeks, and also to include not only the right, but also the left leg, he implicitly agreed immediately, but it became clear later that he deceived me. Not for nothing he providently enclosed the requisition for the ultrasound in an envelope, and stick it.


Only on my way home, I opened the envelope, pulled out the requisite, and found out that only the right leg was mentioned (see below):


The requisition on the ultrasonography which has been given out on October 6, 2007 by doctor Stephen Gershkovich (Gerskovits)...


My reprint "manually" from the archival copy:

__________________________________

Centre Hospitalier de St.-Mary

3830 avenue Lacombe, Montréal, Québec, H3T 1M5


Oct. 6, 2007 - Dr. Herskovitz


For Echographie / Doppler - Venous

FLV Doppler, Right Leg

__________________________________


Abundantly clearly that the left leg was excluded from the requisition because Doppler -Duplex result of the both legs would show that the doctors deal with the vascular trauma, instead of something else, and Dr. Gershkovich (Gershkovits) - or the people who stood behind him - were mortally afraid of it.


Besides, it is clear from this document that Dr. Gerskovits gave an order to radiologists not to scan the deep veins but only the superficial, i.e. obviously to exclude a possible result inconvenient for someone.


But this is not all.


It appeared that the repeated ultrasound was appointed to October 10, 2007, at 10:00 though Gershkovits agreed to organize it in 2 weeks.


Why such a haste if at first he categorically refused to send me for an ultrasound AT ALL? Well, this is also quite clear. After all - in 2 days after the first ultrasound test a picture of the changes in the vascular damage healing would not display anything, and namely this was tremendously necessary for Dr. Gershkovich (Gershkovits). And 2 weeks after a trauma - it is quite another matter: if the ultrasound shows an obvious process of a spontaneous dissolution of blood clots - then (besides) there will be no doubts about their traumatic origin (and that could also confirm the fact of the accident), and there will be no doubts that Gershkovich's false diagnosis - is a fiction.


But, anyway, I was ready to go for the ultrasound test on October 10, 2007: because the clarification of the vascular damage was a vital question. Then I hoped to obtain a requisition for one more ultrasound from another doctor.


Unfortunately, since October 8, 2007 I could not move at all, and could not show up on the day of the appointment.


What could I do: to call an Ambulance (the ambulance car)? But it is impossible to call the Ambulance for a trip to the ultrasound test. The Ambulance would bring me - at the best - to the same hospital, in the worst scenario - to another hospital. Also what further? Unless several visits to ER was insufficient to understand that there is well coordinated and massive sabotage of rendering of the medical care?


On October 9 I already understood that in my condition I will not reach the hospital tomorrow, and called the radiology, asking to reschedule the appointment. At first they gave me another appointment to October 17, 2007 (14:00), but later for some reason (no more on my initiative) they changed it for October 19, 2007 (9:00).


As it was already stressed, the requisition for an ultrasound was issued by doctor Gershkovich (October 6, 2007).


It is necessary to add one more curious detail.


The reference for an ultrasound was given out to me (already in the filled out form) by doctor Gershkovich - after he left the room for several minutes, and returned again. (Went to consult "the administration"? Called to a foreign embassy or BB? Received the instructions WHAT to write in the requisition and in the official ultrasound report?).


In this document the signature of doctor (Gershkovich) is put down only, but there is neither name, nor his doctor"s license number indicated.


Now let"s go back to the described document (to the medical summary following the results of the medical examination).


Dr. Gershkovich noted that I left the hospital at 16:00.


In a column of the planned repeated exams or procedures he wrote "Doppler in 1 week" (ultrasonography in 1 week) - whereas himself arranged with the radiology for October 10, 2007!


He writes the following in the official report:


14:53 - (in the top block it is written about the blood pressure controlling medication) -


"NPI: Presented oct. 3 (it is corrected to "2") ---> hit by car --->

---> pain right leg ---> O/C d home".


"Returned yesterday ---> seen in ER ---> returns today ---> for Doppler".


At the beginning of the following section - are different indicators; abundantly clearly that doctor Gershkovich (Gershkovits) tried to write as unreadable (even "for the" (physicians) as possible.


Below:


exam.(?) right leg (...) superficial

calf (...) + (...)


Even lower:


"U/S: haematoma medial gastroc. [gastrocnemius muscle]

thrombus in Greater Saphenous vein

from mid calf to mid thigh

---> (...)".


It is not excluded that the doctor meaningly used signs, acronyms, and symbols, forbidden by instructions, and intentionally made the records half unreadable.


Where he simply repeats the summary of the ultrasonography, the text still can be read (therefore it is possible) but where there are his own conclusions - his handwriting becomes absolutely illegible.


Moreover, 3 medical workers to whom I showed this official report, agreed that such a writing is not acceptable, and did not disassemble it completely because it took too much time (if, of course, did not pretend to, having realized that here "smells fried").


One more curious feature: all 3 of them by the writing of "Presented oct. 3" took it for "Pretended (that) oct. 3". (At the "second" reading it turns out: "the patient presented the events so, that, ALLEGEDLY, he was hit by car").


Now - my retelling of what it was possible to disassemble:


14:53 (this part we omit)

"NPI: Presented on October 3 (corrected to "2") ---> hit by car ---> the right leg pain ---> (was examined, and sent home)".

"Returned yesterday ---> accepted ER ---> returned today ---> for ultrasonography".

exam. (?) right foot (...) the superficial (...) + (...) calves (leg).


Lower:

"U/S: hematoma medial muscle gastroc. [gastrocnemius muscle] blood clots in the Great Saphenous a vein from the middle calves to the middle hip ---> (...)".


Another thing that should be noted is that - at least - 1 page from supposed 3, filled out on October 6, 2007, by Dr. Gershkovich (Gershkovitsem), has "disappeared" from the medical archive of St.-Mary's hospital, or they simply persistently refused to give it to me. Possibly, there was something such astonishing that they did not want to show it at all.


When I asked doctor Gershkovich, whether to continue taking aspirin, he answered affirmatively.


I ceased to take aspirin right after the injuries: since October 2, 2007.


If I, according to the advice of doctor Gershkovich (Gershkovits), began taking aspirin again, it is possible to imagine, which extensive bleeding could follow. But I (to my advantage) did not follow the advice of doctor Gershkovich (Gershkovits), and did not take aspirin any more (during 3 following weeks).


Doctor Gershkovich rejected ALL my requests for treatment, i.e. (see above):


1. Antibiotic for prevention of thrombophlebitis and infection of internal hematomas.

2. Injection of the physiological solution.

3. Injection of thrombin.

4. Compression therapy.

5. Anti-inflammatory.

6. Professional bandage.

7. Geparin in 10-14 days.

8. More effective pain-killer then Tylenol.


I was kicked out from St.-Mary's hospital ER home, without getting ANY medical care and without having appointed any medications or medical procedures.


After I (with huge efforts and with the improbable torments) got home, a huge hematoma (bruise) began to be formed on the internal part of the right foot. I consider: it was the blood from the damaged blood vessels of the right leg's calf and the top part of the anklebone zone, and other localizations (that above the knee), was - by the gravity (I after all stayed in the hospital about 7-8 hours!) - pushed down and gathered below.


It began at 18.20, and continued all night long, being accompanied by severe pain and impossibility to step on the sick foot.


1. (The left-side photo). About 18:20 at the evening I noticed a cyanotic (darkening) area (hemorrhage) on an internal part of this foot (see above).

2. (The next photo). Blood from the damaged blood vessels (passing through the muscle) of the right leg, flew down inside the leg - causing terrible pain, - and gathered in the very bottom (from the foot top to the sole of the right foot).


To 21:00 - 22:00 the new formed hematoma has already looked terribly, and it was impossible to step on the foot (see above). Each step caused an extreme pain paroxysm - as though the foot was pierced by a red-hot ramrod, or an electric discharge passed through the foot.


At night the hematoma continued to darken and increased in its size...


Even at the "healing" stage (see above) the foot still looked terribly, and pain did not cease. It is possible to imagine my condition if the pain in the Big Saphenous vein was still stronger than the pain from the neogenic hematoma of the foot!


The most important is that it is necessary to emphasize: the foot hematoma was only a SECONDARY COMPLICATION EFFECT of the TRAUMA though even days and a week later represented an awful show (see above).


It shows that the internal (invisible to an eye) traumas of the blood vessels were "100 times" more appalling, than this bruise seen to an eye.


If the hemorrhage in the most lower part of the foot in 4 days after the road accident was ONLY the CONSEQUENCE of the MAIN - PRIMARY - TRAUMAS, WHAT MONSTERS should be those who for WEEKS UNDERESTIMATED my injuries caused by the road accident, MUDDLED my WORDS, FORGED SYMPTOMS AND EVEN FIRST REFUSED the ultrasound test?!


The doctors provoked this new complication because I should lie in a bed, and they kept me in the hospital sitting (without having taken care at all and without offering an opportunity to lay down) 7-8 hours in a row, and without having issuing any treatment!


If the medical measures were offered in due time and were carried out operatively - any new hematoma and any secondary vascular damage would, probably, never occurred!


Two pictures show a) the initial stage of blood accumulation - around the foot - from above passable blood vessels; b) later situation (the most awful pictures are not presented - not to frighten the public). Easily could happen that the blood clots could reach (by the bloodstream) the heart or brain, and then - death...


It is clearly visible in these pictures, as the hematoma approximately through 4-ро days after incident, without secondary damages, walking or physical efforts was formed (I spent all this time to beds, except departures in St hospital. - Mary's). By the morning new visit to Ambulance was represented inevitable and necessary. But it was necessary to cause an ambulance car and to go to other hospital. Without having made it, I made a big mistake.


CHAPTER 6


OCTOBER 7 2007.


October 07 2007 (Sunday), at 11:51 - the wife took me to ER by car.


October 07 2007, at 17:51 - I left home by our car.


================


In the morning, supported by my wife and my daughter, I - with huge efforts - came downstairs from the 3-rd floor, and my wife brought me by our car to St.-Mary"s hospital ER.


The very fact that in the package of medical documents for October 2-20, 2007, obtained from the medical archive there is no record of the triage nurse report for October 7, 2007, and also 2 of the 3 pages filled by Dr. Donald Sproule, and also 1 of the expected 3 pages filled by doctor Stephen Gershkovich (Gershkovitsem) is already verbose.


It is obvious that the administration and the doctors had what to hide.


Thus is absolutely similar to the actions of the medical department of Immigration, which used to destroy the material evidence (the particular documents) to hide the truth (see the Book 1).


The sole and unique document that was not destroyed and was still available from the medical archive (from the ER documents for October 7, 2007): it is a page form filled by Dr. Donald Sproule, where - in the column "the final diagnosis" - he entered: "Superficial Thrombophlebitis" - though any doctor by just the view of the photos above (of the neogenic foot hematoma) will make a fun of such a "diagnosis" and will be surprised - how in general such a fake diagnosis could be accepted.


It was already abundantly clear that an awful huge hematoma on the inside of the right foot: it is obviously a POST-TRAUMATIC hematoma formed because of the internal damages from a crushing blow of the car.


Therefore, the diagnosis could not be different, rather than the POST-TRAUMATIC THROMBOSIS of superficial and deep veins!


And after all - Dr. Sproule had before him not only the ultrasound result (the report) where it was written in black and white: the internal hematoma and thrombosis, but already saw a huge "external" hematoma, and the second, slightly above and smaller, which accompanied by edema and reddening higher. Besides, also showing the foot hematoma I said to the doctor that an acute intolerable pain located at the area of the internal hematoma (in the gastroknemius muscle of the calf) provokes almost the loss of the consciousness - when changing the body position from horizontal to vertical.


It turns out that Dr. Donald Sproule "did not notice" the terrible hematoma on the internal part of the foot at all!


But this is understandable: he was ordered not to notice any traumas, and this hematoma disproved all previous conclusions of criminal doctors, who were denying the traumatic nature of the thrombosis and other injuries" complications.


After all blood outpouring in the lower part of the foot following a blow and compression trauma: is a classical symptom of a serious injury of muscles and blood vessels which demands the most urgent treatment and continuous supervision of doctors.


He noted only pain in the leg (leg pain), without having specified, which leg is painful, thereby having deliberately called into question the very fact of the pain (known - it is obvious how he put it - from patient"s words).


Therefore, the main goal of Dr. Sproule, who did not wish to specify, which leg is painful: was to sow doubt in the solvency of patient"s words, having artificially undermined trust to any of his patient"s statements and words.


And "not to notice" the very huge bruise on the area equal to almost the whole right foot: for this purpose, doctor Sproule should go blind completely, or to examine any other patient - not me.


The official report of doctor Donald Sproule - on October 7, 2007...


Such a sadistic treatment and the criminal acts of the doctors who have actually organized tortures, could be explained only by the use of the health care for political goals, for repressions against the dissidents. Thus, having written instead of the obvious "post-traumatic thrombosis with hematomas, pseudo-aneurism and a compression syndrome" - the diagnosis "thrombophlebitis", putting artificially in doubt patient"s complains about the pain, refusing to indicate, which leg is painful, and issuing NO treatment and medications, and without having given ANY recommendations (and having WITHOUT A THING sent his patient home), doctor Sproule, after doctor Gershkovich (Gershkovitsem), meaningly committed a serious crime, having subjected me to real torture, the most real threat of amputation, and impudently forged the summary of the examination and the diagnosis, "without having noticed" a huge, terrible hematoma.


And this with the fact that I gave to him - as well as to all other doctors, - a list of my demands of the above already listed medical measures and procedures.


Being a doctor and perfectly understanding to what torments he dooms me, and "throwing me out" home from the hospital, doctor Sproule has acted in the opposite to doctor"s behavior way, that is: as an executioner and a torturer.


Not casually (understanding his criminal acts and trying to shade them) in the column Follow Up (further procedure / treatment): doctor Sproule put a birdie near Yes, and at the line Were (where) entered an absolutely unreadable scribble.


But - if he would really appoint and issued the follow-ups he would not leave the line When empty! The empty line "When" and deliberate writing of absolutely unreadable abracadabra in the line "Where" speak for itself.


In the column "Explanation to Patient" Dr. Sproule placed a birdie in the line Yes whereas he explained to me absolutely nothing and did not tell anything. Moreover, considering the gravity of my condition, the threat of an embolization and other most terrible complications, it was necessary (by the common sense) not only inform the patient orally, but also to give him a written document (a manual). And even this - all the same - would not remove the charges at least in negligence because due to SUCH traumas it was impossible by no means to send me home (without having appointed any treatment, a referral to a specialist, and other procedures).


When I showed photos of the hematomas and the ultrasound reports to several doctors in the different countries, they were terrified, and said that - on medical standards both in Russia, and in Europe, and in Canada - the doctors were obliged 1) to hospitalize me, 2) or at least to invite a vascular specialist for consultation immediately, and 3) to organize follow-up examinations and the help from CLSC, and 4) urgently to provide the treatment.


It is impossible to decipher what Dr. Sproule deliberately scratched in the column "where" concerning the Follow Ups: he tried it wonderfully well.


But it is easy to guess what he would answer, if would be asked to decipher his scribble. He would answer that he meant the ultrasound referred by doctor Gershkovich (Gershkovits). And nothing else!


So, was it just casual that 2 pages of documents filled by him were withdrawn from the medical archive (and, probably, destroyed).


In the column Responsabilite de paiement - since October 5, 2007, was always "MSSS sans accident" though it was obviously an accident with the damage for victim"s health.


It is evident at once that doctor Sproule (if such doctor really exists): is not anyone but Dr. Gershkovich (Gershkovits) - because his conclusion was automatically and without any changes copied, i.e. actually DUPLICATED. Thus, nobody can deny that through the person of doctor Sproule actually acted Dr. Stephen Gershkovich (Gershkovits).


There will be no words and expressions to tell, what pain I experienced, and how worried I was because of the fears that will remain till the end of my life a disabled person and would not be able to walk normally, or that, worse than that, I will lose a leg.


I held ice for 10 minutes each 15-25 minutes, made baths, adding the vascular healing substances in the water, and greased the superficial veins with Troxevazin. I used massage; contrast (warm and cold) compresses; bandage for 2-3 hours per day; kept legs higher most of the time; and did dozens of others healing operations.


In young years I showed an interest to the Tibetan medicine and to how wounds were treated in the Middle Ages (rather successfully). I used the whole set of the techniques in the treatment of the damaged veins, and I am sure that if I did not do it, the consequences would be very pitiable. But, at all my shifts, I received many complications (I"ll tell about them further). Right now I"ll just mention that after the injuries, which I received from the car that hit me, a grid of pathological capillaries arose, with the plaques and hemorrhages, and began to extend and get denser.


The additional tragic prospect is connected to our unprivileged socioeconomic situation, because our poor means did not allow to buy special vascular medication, to make, for example, coniferous baths (turpentine oil), or with Zalmavann, or to get (for money, if the doctors refused to prescribe anything) Ascorutine, Detralex, etc.


Only thanks to my resourcefulness in replacing the inaccessible treatment by simpler means, substances and products, to my persistence on my fight for recovery, and, not excluded, to some unique qualities of my organism - I remained alive, and on both feet. But doctors Gershkovich (Gershkovits) and Sproule did the utmost in their situation to sabotage my recovery and to increase the danger of disability or death.


As to the role of doctor Chrissie Paraveskopolus, it is more difficult to assess her actions due to the situational "interlocutory", but only 1 fact that - instead of her own signature - she used (in the medical protocol) the signature of Mr. Sivaraman Krishna (whom I did not remember at all), transfers this history to an absolutely different plane.


CHAPTER 7


OCTOBER 19, 2007.


19 Oct. 2007: 09.00 - my wife took me to the hospital by car.


19 Oct. 2007: 09.35 - procedure of the 2-nd ultrasound (of the right leg - foot).


19 Oct. 2007: 12.10 - interpretation of the Double Doppler ultrasonography data.

=========================


With the painful efforts, overcoming pain, I limped to radiology at the same St.-Mary"s

hospital. It is possible to imagine my condition of that time if I - who rejected any help and essentially never wanted to "exploit" someone - let my wife to attend and to support me.


The ultrasound procedure was carried out by the same "Michael", as on October 6, 2007, but in the medical documents could be mentioned and could sign just anybody: as we were already convinced by the forgeries examples (substitution of doctor Paraskevopulos" name by name of Dr. Krishna, etc.). Was the signature under the official report - "Michael"s" or the doctor-radiologist"s: it is not known.


It is the same signature, as under the official report on October 6, 2007.


Here is the official report - the result of the ultrasonography from October 19, 2007:


Result of ultrasonography on October 19, 2007.


My "reprint" of the text in the Canadian English (or, rather "Franglish"):

__________________________________

Centre Hospitalier de St. - Mary

3830 avenue Lacombe, Montreal, Quebec, H3T 1M5


ECHOGRAPHIE: (514) 734-26-21


19/10/2007 09:35


Gunin, Lev


ref. Herskovitz Steven


Provenance: ER - Emergency Department


19/10/2007 DOPPLED PEREFIRIAL VENOUS STUDY & DUPLEX


Report - 10/19/2007 - Gunin, Lev


Right Leg:


- No DVT [Deep Venous Thrombosis]

(... patient CFV [COMMON FEMORAL],

SFV [SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL],

Popiteal & deep calf veins)


- Great Saphenous (and)

Superficial Femoral (?) vein -

still some trombus: / in

portion (?) thigh (knee-... 1/3)

__________________________________


Any medical worker will tell that some words of this official report are written not very legible for non-medics. But the strangeness (singularity) is not only in it.


Today everyone is able to print on the computer, and all official reports long before 2007 were already digitally typed, instead of being written by hand. If it is possible to assume about the official report on October 6, 2007 that he it was made and given to me in a hurry and consequently it was written by hand, it is not true about the official report on October 19, 2007.


Why then not to type the report on the computer? Was it not for the purpose of making this report unreadable for the patient, who not supposed to understand the medical handwriting?


2-nd strangeness: the ultrasound procedure began at 9:35 in the mornings, but the time in the official report is usually indicates the completion of a medical procedure, instead of the beginning. Moreover, the interpretation was ready only at 12:10, whether whereas the previous official report of ultrasound was ready already prepared in 15 minutes after the completion of the procedure.

__________________________________


Despite the handwriting, the main sense of this medical certificate (Double Doppler) is that the thrombosis "resolves" though "still" not completely "disappeared". And it incontestably testifies to the traumatic origin of blood clots and about the veins injury as a result of a blow, disproving everything that doctor Stephen Gershkovich, doctor Sproule, and other emergency doctors were trying to present: as if there was no accident, and all serious problems with the veins have emerged due to somatic (not traumatic) nature.


On the other hand, this official report speaks nothing about the connected with the compression syndrome pathologies (after all this syndrome cannot be present without detectable for ultrasound scan vascular disorders), about obviously being present pseudo-aneurism, and also about the huge foot hematoma, which not only did not resolve since October 6-th to October 19-th, but looked even more terribly, than before.


There is a striking contradiction in this report - between the real and perfectly visible bruise (huge) on the inside of the right foot - and the total absence of a mention of it.


Any mentions about - connected to this bruise - leaking of the plantar, marginal and dorsal veins. Thus, this official report is obviously forged, in the sense that seriously underestimates the blood vessels" injuries, keeping silence about the initial damages, and about the complications (traumatic consequences).


By analogy, it is possible to assume, that the 1-st official report for October 6th, 2007, was also forged, and the suspicions into this account arose on the basis of absolutely other reasons.


Combining these 2 reasons, it is possible to tell with confidence that both official reports underestimate the damage caused by the road accident.


After the ultrasound procedure (during which the radiologist so pressed on sore points so that I almost jumped up to the ceiling from pain) I could not make a step, could not step on the injured foot, and somehow jump down on 1 foot to the 1-st (ground) floor to the ER, because I realized very clearly that I"ll not be able to reach a bus stop but even if I would take a taxi: I was not sure that I can "crawl" to my 3-rd floor at home. Not only the right, but also the left leg / foot was painful - simply in comparison with right leg pain it was "not a pain". As my wife and my daughters were not at home, nobody could help me, and the best that I could do: to go down to the ground floor and to limp to ER. Evaluating my condition as grave, I decided to be examined by a doctor one more time.


Only at 11:51 I was registered in ER. (But there is no word in the report on it).


At 12:10 I got to the triage nurse.


The record made by this triage nurse on October 19, 2007 at 12:10 is amazing - in the sense that she did not mention at all that I was hit be car and that the hematomas (bruises), pain and vascular damages are the result of the accident. On the other hand - is the 1-st and unique objective (not forged) record in ER since October 2 to October 19, 2007, which is in a sharp contradiction with all other formularies:


The official report of the triage nurse.


My "reprint" in the Canadian English:


_____________________________________________

19/10/2007, 12:10.


OBSERVATIONS SUBJECTIVES/SUBJECTIVE DATE:


Pain to right leg & calf since

October 2.


Seen in ER (Emergency Room),

sent for U/S (Ultrasound)

today. Here are results.


Still has ++ pain (very strong).


OBSERVATIONS OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE DATE:


Right calf swollen and bruising.


Bruises noted to right ankle area & foot.


Limping.

_____________________________________________

_____________________________________________

_____________________________________________


As we see, the symptoms specified here and the observations completely disprove the insinuations of other nurses and doctors which tried to conceal the data about the serious injuries due to the road accident - and did the utmost to forge medical certificates and diagnoses.


With these symptoms they sent me home, without having rendered any medical care, without having prescribed any medications, and without having put any diagnosis.


But even this - the MOST OBJECTIVE - official report of the triage nurse disperses from the real picture: we have just to compare it with the photos foot hematomas. And - still - this official report - assumes in itself that doctor Sproule (if such doctor really exists), impudently forged lies, "without having noticed" hematomas, and, the main thing - the terrible hematoma on the foot, and that doctors have deliberately undermined my traumas.


However, even by then (October 19, 2007) I did not receive any medical help.


After they have called me on the dynamics to an examination room where my wife (who came by car to drive me home) found me, I waited long enough for a doctor, and, finally, doctor Stephen Gershkovich (Gershkovits) (or someone very much alike him) came to that room - and told that he cannot examine me now. In reply to all my demands and complaints he said, that now I must go home, and "in the nearest future" someone "will call" me concerning the appointment and treatment, and further medical procedures. But nobody contacted me from St.-Mary's hospital, and no one appointed any treatment.


A bit later than in 2 months after the described events, I wrote down:


"For 2 months I stayed on my back, struggling with inhuman pains, which was treated by the "house" remedies, while medical institutions were completely ignoring my condition (1 time I called Ambulance; 3 times I crawled to ER myself - without any results). Would I be forced to do an X-Ray and ultrasound test for my own money - and only then they will treat me (IF will treat me)?"


Only after 8 months (in July, 2008) I "thought" (i.e. could believe in that) that doctor Gershkovich (Gershkovits), probably, himself - personally - called me on dynamics to the waiting room, or someone made it on his request. He performed a false "exam", and actually did not registered any examination, and - according to the official version - did not do it.


He - apparently - enticed me from the waiting room BEFORE I was invited on dynamics to the official examination to provoke my departure from the ER BEFORE the official exam.


Certainly, the ER personnel should interpret my leaving after my departure as personal and voluntary, and, possibly, to write down that I supposedly did not wait for a doctor to examine me. However, in the medical archive it was no document on my premature departure or on an exam by a doctor on October 19, 2007.


When I filled out the documents for a common (general) compensations from the Society of motorists of Quebec, my mother and my wife signed affidavits of the following contents: _______________________________________________


"After Oct. 07, 2007, when complications of his injuries from the car incident have been worsen, my husband, Lev Gunin, was not able to walk, and spent more then a month in bed. He had pain in both of his legs, but his right leg was much worse. He had such a strong pain when tried to get up that sometimes used to fell back. He could not step on his right leg at all, and 2-3 meters that divided his bed from the bathroom became a torture. To get there he had to jump on his left foot, supporting himself by a cane that I took from his mother and brought home.


Since Oct. 06-07, when a scary-looking bruise has formed at his right foot, he had a lot of pain there, but the most painful area appeared to be at the middle of his right calf, inside the veins. Once, when he tried to stay up, pain was so strong that he lost consciousness (fainted). I also admitted changes in the color of his right leg that looked pale gray and scary.


The state of his right leg was slowly worsening till October 22 or 23, and only after began gradually improving. Even in the beginning of November, 2007, I was still bringing food for him in bed. Thinking that in St.-Mary"s ER they downplayed the seriousness of his state, giving no proper treatment, he wanted to visit his family doctor. However, problem was that we live on the 3-rd floor with no elevator, and my husband was not capable to get down the stairs.


Lev Gunin"s wife, And. Gunin".

_______________________________________________

_______________________________________________


These affidavits were sent to Société l"assurance automobile de Québec and to police.


I also added the photos of the injured legs-feet with the sight of the traumatic consequences of the road accident.


And, finally, one more indirect demonstration of the correctness of my statements and my declarations about the ill-intentioned actions of St.-Mary"s hospital ER staff (who were engaged in the underestimation of the degree of gravity of my injuries; in screening and covering-up the driver; in sabotaging of the medical help and diagnostics; and in distorting, twisting, falsifying, and blocking my report about the accident, the car and its driver) was the compensation from the Société l"assurance automobile de Québec. Since this compensation was paid to me on the basis of the gravity of the injuries (even if the Society underestimated the traumas) - it enters into an obvious contradiction with the medical certificates of ER doctors and nurses of the St.-Mary"s hospital, who were impudently and perfidiously denying ANY INJURIES, and ANY ACCIDENT.


Banks, Tax Agency, or the Société l"assurance automobile de Québec are very serious institutions, which evaluate their clients" eligibility for compensation very seriously, and, if such an agency came to a conclusion that I am eligible to receive compensation: it is a very solid proof of the gravity of the accident and of my injuries. And, if so, even if a surgical treatment of the veins damage in the similar to my cases would not exist, merely by the denial of the injuries, by the diagnosis falsification, by the initial refusal of the ultrasound test, by the denial of obvious damages, by the screening the driver, and by the distortion of my complaints and words, and by the refusals to react to my demands, and by other ill-intentioned actions, the doctors and nurse of St,-Mary"s ER have committed serious crimes.


The letter from Société l"assurance automobile de Québec, accompanying compensation payment.


I present (see below) the letter from the Société l"assurance automobile de Québec:


The letter from Société l"assurance automobile de Québec, accompanying compensation payment.


CHAPTER 8


NOVEMBER, 2007.


In one of my statements I wrote to different organizations after the New Year (in the 2008):


__________________________

In the end of October, feeling better (to a certain degree) - physically and psychologically, - I wrote a report, and came to Police Station N 25 on Decarie (11 of Nov., 2007), to find out: if the driver of the car has reported the accident to police (...), and b) if my call to 911 was registered somewhere in the police system. I also took my written statement about the incident to police (...) . In the course of communication with the policemen, subject of registration of my previous contact was lost, and I of went out of there without any knowledge of this. However, I found out that the driver did not contact the police, and did not report the incident. I demanded something more then a simple name, and a number, to be sure that my report was registered, but unsuccessfully.

__________________________


As it was already told above, I could bring my statement to police only on November 11, 2007, but it was signed by me on October 29, 2007 (when it was written).


Here it is necessary to make a very important reminder.


For my part, the question - to initiate or not to initiate a criminal case concerning the accident on October 2, 2007 - was accompanied (for my part) by inconsistent motivations and motives.


On the one hand, I hoped that the initiation of a legal procedure will possibly clear the identity of the driver and to add new details to the reflection over the question, was this accident casual or planned.


On the other hand, being the idealist and person in general "other-wordly", I took into consideration also the interests of the driver who could become simply a victim of our mutual carelessness.


Therefore this dilemma was interfered - for my part - by question of justice.


On the one hand, having been unable to estimate independently the guilt of the driver, his guilt"s degree and the presence of the malicious intention in his behavior, I was not ardently desiring (as in the first days) to demand any trial.


On the other hand, the actions of doctors and triage nurses of St.-Mary"s hospital (who wildly called into question the very fact of accident (as though I invented it!) and even the traumatic nature of the vascular damage) induced a wish of a trial.


If, I argued, it would be possible to receive from police documents which would unconditionally confirm the fact of the accident, its exact time and a place, and, probably, a record from the surveillance cameras, that, with such documents in hands, I would force doctors (as I thought) to recognize my traumas and to appoint the treatment.


I will add that at the beginning of November, despite some improvement, I still was shocked by the prospects to remain a disabled person till the end of my life with the vascular damage, and still suffered from severe pains, practically could not walk (hardly limped some meters from the car to a police station No. 25 to bring my statement), and did not know what will happen later if in one way or another I will not be able to compel the doctors to undertake a minimal treatment.


It is necessary to notice that my worries about this were by November 11th, 2007, on take-off.


Here, in principle, are the main additional circumstances.


..................


So, on November 11, 2007, I took this letter (see below) to the police station No. 25 at an intersection of Van Horn and Decarie streets, which, in my opinion, was the closest to the place, where the car hit me. (see the copy of this document below)


The copy of my written statement to Montreal police, poste number 25, on November 11, 2007, with the certificate of the police officer.


Here is its full text:


_____________________________________

\\

To Montreal Police

From Lev (Leon) of GUNIN

(address ............)

Montreal, Quebec

Tel. (514) 000000000000


DECLARATION


Tuesday, October the 2nd, 2007, around 21:10 (I had no watch on my wrist), I was hit by a new looking white car 988 PPH (Quebec plate), while - with my bicycle - crossing a small street (Saranac) of that opens into Decarie. Before being hit by the car, I was on sidewalk, moving along (on) of the sidewalk from Chemin Queen-Mary towards Chemin Cote-St. - Luc (South-East). The car 988 PPH was waiting to make a right turn to Decarie, for southern direction (opposite to my movement).


Before crossing the street, I made a full stop, and then went ahead. At that moment, column of cars on Decarie still contained 3-4 more vehicles; so, car that hit me still could not make a turn.


With a considerable acceleration and on considerable speed the powerful car suddenly pulled forward, directly at me, leaving no time for escape. Instinctively, I pushed away the bike, and jumped on car"s hood and windshield, and from there landed on the ground, on my both feet. It seems to me that seeing me just in front of his car, driver had enough time and room to slam on the brakes, but did not do that. Even after hitting me, he would just run, but was stopped by the traffic on Decarie.


I forced him from his car by shouting at him (his window was open). He asked me if I"m OK, and I of said "no", but he didn"t investigate if I of need help; instead, he justified his actions. According to his words, he never hit anybody before, and didn"t see me because he was not looking to the right at all. He only looked at the left, watching cars on Decarie. Obviously, in his own words, he didn"t pay any attention to potential pedestrians.


The car hit me practically on last inches of the pavement (sidewalk), or very near, while abruptly turning right and cutting the edge. Instead of an ("" turn, he performed an abrupt "/" turn from where he stopped, placing his car in the tail of the passing column. Such a maneuver, driver's eyes focused exclusively on the cars on Decarie, and extreme acceleration were the causes of the accident. After expressing his vision about the accident, the driver took his driver"s sit - and left the scene.


My bicycle was damaged, as well as its rear light; a lampion light, attached to the bicycle"s handle-bar (rudder) - broken, and another light, attached to my left arm - lost; my pants also tire apart. Only the helmet survived the accident.


My both legs were injured. I had a calf muscle bruised, with an internal muscle bleeding (an internal haematoma), and veins damage with serious complications. For 1 month I of was not able to walk, and now I"m facing serious chronic complications.


29 October, 2007, Montreal.

__________________________________________

[In my statement I (by absent-mindedness) did a mistake, instead of "from" having written "for" that gives an opposite sense to the phrase: instead of "from the southern direction" it turned out "in the southern direction".]


Today such phrases as "jumped up" on the hood, "jumped off" from the hood", "landed on both feet" - sound inconsistently and ridiculously... But... I still felt severe pains, and was in such a condition in which was impossible to write and explain harmoniously. It really could sow a non-favorite impression within the police but anyway no one came or call (!) me from the police department, which is absolutely improbable for Quebec.


And everything that happened in ER is absolutely improbable, too. [It is necessary to consider my condition, and how I could feel - morally and physically - in my dramatic situation; and this inevitably affected my style. But the trained and skilled police officers should consider it, definitively.]


Probably, it was also a mistake and that I considered that I compelled to adhere from now on the same words and the same phrases that were told by me in the office of the triage nurse in ER, at night from 2 to 3 October 2007, though I was in a condition of still a greater affect (stress).


It is necessary to stress that, unlike book heroes and filmstars superman, in a stress condition I lose an ability to express my thoughts and feelings so "smoothly" and without some tongue-tie.


At the same time, as it seems to me and as I know according to the written statements in stressful situations, I never lose the abilities for the objective assessment of the situation, and never lose threads of logic.


A well-hanged tongue and an ability to continue to "stir" and to use the "talkative qualities" even under the torture: is, allegedly, a congenital "east-trading" virtue. But I am - "not a verbal" person, and I express my thoughts much better "on paper", and to an abstract reader, not to a lawyer or a policemen. (However, it depends also on the periods of my life).


In general, this is one of mine "weak places".


Actually - I hardly could realize and remember, how I found myself on the ground and what happened between the blow from the car and my landing. The only thing that I was able to realize objectively and which has printed in my consciousness (in memory) is that I landed on both feet. I will never forget those few seconds when it was impossible to escape (to evade) from the rushing car (I just started from a standing position uphill, and the maneuverability was zero); I realized it not in a second, but in a fraction of a second, and reacted by such a response that reconciled to the car blow, having completely given to it, and by that used the kinetic energy in my own favor. If I did not group the muscles, and what is called "fascia", and, instead, would try to do impossible and to try to evade, having taken the whole blow on bones and veins, the consequences would be much more serious.


All this was accompanied by a perception phenomenon when it seemed to me that I see - like in a slow-motion shot - as my feet inexplicably push away the bicycle down, being liberated and discharged of a frame, and my body goes up (unclear, at the expense of a push from what)... But even thus - the bicycle frame all the same damaged inside of both legs, but without the partial liberation from the frame it could be much worse.


Since that moment until the landing I hardly realized and remembered something. I acted on full automation. It is surprising that, except of the injury of a muscle and legs veins, there were not a single scratch, or a single bruise on me.


It is sure that today I could point to other mistakes in my perception and the description of the accident by then.


As I already mentioned, the peace of paper, where I wrote down the car brand and model, its plate license number, the name of the street (where this car hit me), and other details: was lost. Only the car license plate number survived, because I memorized it, or already copied to my notebook. So, almost 7 months after the accident I began an inspection of the 2-3 small (but wide) streets that run against Decarie, and are interrupted by Decarie"s highway.


I found the location of the accident; however, as I think, it was not Saranak Street, but, (probably) rather Ponsar Street.


In November, 2007, I was not yet physically (and partly psychologically) in a condition to carry out such an inspection.


Later I also realized that hardly truly estimated (in my memory) the distance from the standing car (before it "rushed forward") to the crosswalk. And the street appeared wider, then I imagined before the inspection.


The car, which hit me, was obviously further from me at the moment of street crossing then I defined in my first records. I usually make a U-detour-on-the-contrary in front of a standing car ("just in case of...") to guarantee both myself and the driver a distance and time for maneuvering, and that time was not an exception. Besides, I intuitively hesitated 2-3 seconds, feeling something - and expecting the car"s eventual movement more on a straight line, instead of sharply obliquely - as it happened actually. (It was presented so in my first records, literally right after the accident).


It was written down that the driver continued "pressing on gas" 1-3 seconds after he should obviously see me directly in front of his car (as the car stood obliquely).


It was like he waited for a moment, when I"ll be at least on "half-bicycle" out of sidewalk limits that - if something happens - it did not appear so that he hit me on the sidewalk.


Before jerking from the place, the car stood almost on the opposite side of the road, under a considerable tilt angle to me.


Because a good car with a skillful driver accelerates much quicker than the cyclist: for this purpose, if someone would intend to bring me down deliberately, this was an ideal position. The tactics of this position is in blocking the trajectory of my eventual movement not only by the front bumper, but by the whole car"s case (corps). The summarized face and lateral area leaves less probability to miss.


Besides, a visual illusion (I checked it) of a smaller inclination of the approaching cars to the northern sidewalk then it actually is - appears in this place (as well as due to the condensing twilight). This "optical illusion" also forced me to count an expected trajectory of car"s movement incorrectly.


And the fact that I started to carry out a U-figurative-on-the-contrary detour in front of the car, just explains that, standing at an angle to me, the car did not collide with my bike"s front wheel and did not hit me with its lateral side, but went on me by its front bumper.


But this also should perfectly show me to the driver, and - thus - it is twice strange that he could "not notice" me. The distance separating me from the car, appeared, as I understood, sufficient to generate the driver"s reaction, but even at the moment of the accident he still did not press on the brakes.


If I did not land sideways from the car, I would be thrown on Decarie Road - under the wheels of the passing vehicles.


The car moved to Decarie till the latest moment as though it was the intention of the driver.


According to the law, both parties of a road incident should remain on place before police arrival. But the one who caused injuries to another one (in that case this was the driver), broke the law much more seriously. The driver should immediately call 911, and remain on place waiting for an ambulance and police. By his escape (not only by hitting me), the driver committed a serious crime.


I copy from the report of the beginning of 2008 other facts: (.........) [First 4 points are omitted]:


"5. During the last 3 weeks (before the accident) death threats appeared again, and both their number and aggression increased. I will add that I was hit by car 988-PPH Quebec (on October 2, 2007) on the street which (if looking at the map) is a street continuation of the street where there lived my mother. It is a symbol. Before the accident - police cars 98-07 and 50-92 followed me.


6. On the one hand, Ponsar, the street where I was hit by the car, is a silent "dead end", almost a lane (though with the wide road). On the other hand, the driver, appeared, was a self-confident, wealthy, healthy, concentrated young man. How could happen, that a person of this type reacted so slowly in such an easy, not so complex road situation when only two directions of attention - other cars on Decarie and potential pedestrians at the left-on the right - were required? A darting-off and roaring car in a sleepy "lane" (as a silent backyard), cutting-off the corner, was less expected here.


7. The staged accident executed by means of a vehicle - is the most inexpensive and "safe" mutilating or killing tool.


8. In ER the triage nurse and 2 young doctors - Judith Cohen and Stephen Gershkovich, by behavior and look similar to activists of "one organization": they were as a very familiar requisite. As one of my friends (knowing a course of my thought) joked over me, "they were ready to your arrival earlier, than you were hit by this damned car".


At the beginning of November, 2007 I wrote:


"Generally, a refusal of veins ultrasound in reply to persevering requests of a patient in a post-traumatic case - is not an ordinary incident. After October 6, 2007, the internal bleeding suddenly became more active again, and the leg-foot pain at movement became much more painful. Since then I cannot walk at all, unable to go downstairs to the car, and - therefore - to go to hospital (...) . Now I am under a "house arrest", expecting improvement - or death".


After many years, having read a lot of medical literature on the subject of the damaged veins, I understood that did not exaggerate by then at all...


Considering the driving style which the driver of the car that hit me demonstrated: probably, it is such an aggressive and dangerous manner of driving; he broke from place and flew up closely to Decarie with an intention to put between other cars insolently in the "forcible" way.


The fact that the driver - at all the unwillingness - nevertheless exit his car and inquired, whether I am OK, and even suggested to take me home or to a hospital: is not evidently speaking in favor of him. If he"s a smart and good-educated (and he looked such) person, he would do exactly so - even if hit me "deliberately". What could happen - if he would flee from the crime scene? This could be interpreted as the proof of his guilt. Then I would addressed to police for certain with more persistence or even through a lawyer, and definitely would demand to put the car and the driver on the wanted list. Having exit the car, he also has an opportunity to find out what happened to his victim and with whom he in general deals. And, finally, everything happened in the face of many drivers of the column of the traffic congestion along Decarie St. at that very moment "tightly" standing bumper to bumper without movement. So, it was no room to escape, and, besides, if he would not exit his car, somebody among the drivers (among the witnesses) could call the police. And the drivers were looking out from their open car windows on my shout.


The "third" group of the facts (both then, and today) is represented by the incontestable evidence of the screening and covering-up the driver on the state-police, hospital and administrative level.


In ER - they refused to write down the license plate number of the car (which hit me). They were screening the driver by refusing to me an ultrasound test, and did everything to underestimate the gravity of my traumas. My statements to police (including the written statement!) completely "sank into a chasm" as though they did not exist at all.


Today, when the lawlessness of the intelligence services and other enforcement agencies, accruing mayhem and total corruption have entered into a malignant phase on the global scale, it is possible to imagine it, but then, in 2007, they were still outstanding things.


As the leading role in St.-Mary"s hospital ER"s screening of the driver and in the sabotage of diagnostic and in the refusal of rendering the medical help procedures (that sabotage could cause very serious consequences, from amputation to death) - played doctor Stephen Hershkovich (Gershkovits), - it is necessary to give him some additional paragraphs.


When I was examined by him the 1-st time, in the end of examination it seemed to me that he is the person who drove the car PPH Quebec which hit me: that it he was that driver. Then, already at home, I thought over this impression, and I was overcome by doubts. On my estimations, that driver was slightly higher than doctor Gershkovich (Gershkovits), a little bit younger, and that Dr. Gershkovich is more alike the Asiatic Caucasian type or the Mediterranean type, while the driver was more white "European". Besides, by the time of the accident I already knew Dr. Gershkovich (Hershkovits) who 2 or 3 times examined my mother, and, probably, I would recognize him, if he was the driver of the car which hit me.


And, nevertheless, an ominous fact can be hidden behind the impression that doctor Gershkovich (Hershkovits) is the driver of the car which hit me. For example, it could be a family similarity, and a relative very similar to him could sit at a wheel. Or my consciousness has caught a more delicate similarity that sometimes connects the adherents, or very close friends. Than, what if the driver of the car which hit me - is Mr. Gershkovich's colleague and a member of an organization (which member is also Mr. Gerskovits) and his close friend?


And, finally, a very small, but still a probability exists (and not excluded completely) that the accident was committed by doctor Gershkovich (Hershkovits) himself, and that it was he who hit me by his car [the condensing twilight and a foreshortening could deceive my perception, not to mention a stressful situation], and then the information, given to me by one of my sources, which revealed the name of the driver of the car 988-PPH Quebec as "Gershkovits": not a provocation.


Nevertheless, to rely on own feelings in such business as incident investigation - means let's withdraw yourself on probably a false way, and it is important for me to learn the truth, no to guess or to speculate.


In 2007-2014 I managed to learn much more about doctor Stephen Gershkovich (Hershkovits), but it is necessary to consider that any of the data given below and the facts can be obviously false or simply incorrect.


1) Stephen Gershkovich (Hershkovits) once passed training in hospital of Cornwall Community Hospital (McConnell Avenue Site, 840 McConnell Avenue, Cornwall, Ontario, K6H 5S5). This hospital is attractive also that renders services in the 2 languages: both French, and English (therefore both Sephardic and Ashkenazy Jews like the training there).


2) Doctor Stephen Gershkovich (Hershkovits) lived to 2013 (2014?) in Outremont's Jewish ghetto, at 720 Av. Antonine-Maillet, Outremont, Montreal, Quebec, H2V 2Y5, phone (514) 303-6089. But the driver of the car which hit me also had a house in Outremont, and another house - in Hamsted (another Jewish ghetto). Only a very rich person could buy such a house, like the house in which doctor Stephen Gershkovich lived. Even in 2007 this house (constructed in 1926) was estimated (approximately) in 2 and a half one million Canadian dollars, and had a peace of land, garage, a parking platform, a pool, 3 bedrooms, 4 bathrooms and 2 toilets, 2 halls (salons), a basement floor, and other rooms. Today such a house, in principle, should cost not less than 5 million dollars. Only municipal taxes were 16 thousand Canadian dollars. The Gerskovits (Gershkovichs), owning this house, should be the real money-bags. The house purchase by people with SUCH ethnic roots in SUCH SPECIAL Jewish ghettoes, as Outremont or Hamsted: is a some kind of a card of their ideological portrait.


3) Since September, 2000, an absolutely still young (by then) Stephen Gershkovich was involved in family business (together with his close or distant relatives) or a "half-business", connected with drugstores and medical laboratories. One of the main lines of such cooperation indicated the CDL laboratory near Cote-des-Neiges-Van Horn streets. Namely this laboratory - the CDL MED - had sent me on November 17, 2000 (see my chronicle for previous years) the receipt by fax, arguing that I should pay for a blood analysis on venereal diseases which - allegedly - handed I did on October 31 2000, and was able to do it only in their office. However, I never did this blood test. This provocation (see records for the corresponding period) was included into a number of terrorist methods which were employed against me by the Canadian Immigration department, on an order of very high Canadian and international political structures


4) Approximately since 2009 (and, maybe, before) his office"s telephone number was 514-345-3511. At the beginning of August, 2008, Stephen Gershkovich (Hershkovits), having picked up an experience from CDL MED and other private laboratories, opened his own laboratory busyness: under the name of Services Médicaux Steven Herskovits Inc. A casual coincidence or not, but approximately since August, 2008 the disappearances of my tests in private laboratories in the area of Cote-St.-Catherine - Cote-des-Neiges and Van Horn became frequent, and they also stopped to give me the copies of the tests, which forced me to do the tests only in the state hospitals. In 2013 Stephen Gershkovich's laboratory still existed, and he was working as an emergency doctor - which represents a classical example of a possible conflict of interests in the most direct and legal understanding. Whether casually the area of commercial and medical interests of that doctor who did the utmost for screening of the driver who hit me, and sabotaged the diagnostics and treatment: it is the area connected for me with one of the most serious problems: the loss or the alteration of the authenticity of my laboratory tests?


5) Whether casually that doctor who - under the most drama circumstances - shockingly refused me the ultrasound test after the road accident, shows a steady and particular interest to the equipment [and to computer programs] for urgent ultrasonography?! Whether casually he participates in the EDTU program: Emergency Department Targeted Ultrasound Roadshow? This program is a program of bringing of new doctors with strong knowledge and thorough experience to the sphere of urgent medical ultrasound screening - and of their training on real models. Gershkovich is teaching within this program, which indicates his huge influence on the reputation of this or that doctor or a technician-radiologist in the field of medical ultrasound. Within his power is to call in question any ultrasound result, which holds a potential possibility of hiding the "unwanted" or "inconvenient" for him ultrasound findings in an "inconvenient" patient.

This can explain, why the radiologists and other professionals (doctors and triage nurses) "did not see" a huge terrible hematoma [visible on made in the same and previous day photos (see above)] on the inside of my right foot which "noticed" on the same day another triage nurse, who described it in her report (see above). This can explain why - in the same way - they "did not notice" a post-traumatic pseudo-aneurism (and the symptoms of the decompression syndrome).


6) As an unusual character and a person of wide diverse activity, doctor Stephen Gershkovich (Gershkovits) is ideally suited under a type of the ideal agent of those or other departments, or the agent of influence of these or those political forces in medical and academic spheres: among those, which are deliberately distancing from the Middle Eastern "military base" and her "subsidiaries" in all countries, representing them in a false manner like in no way connected with the politics. (While, actually, they live, operate and work in "ethnic" ghettoes and on "the ethnic line"). As a rule, such persons "need" a participation in university and others teaching programs - to be accepted in a wider student's environment, revealing dangerous to their customers activists and freethinkers, and extinguishing any spontaneous (independent) political opinions and conversations (thus pretending to be disinterested and apolitical).

Whether casually Gershkovich on the very persevering initiative is teaching at all levels of training - undergraduate, graduate and staff teaching (bachelors, masters, and professional training) at McGILL university - which (as I know) are trying to avoid other teachers. As a rule, such persons "must" to travel all over the world, to participate in wide international actions, forums, conferences and symposiums, to be engaged in the "apolitical" a public and charity activity. And here - we see - Gershkovich (Hershkovits) sits by one seat on 7 chairs: he is a member and sponsor of the international humanitarian organization Dignitas International; he"s in both Montreal (Quebec), and in Cornell and Cornwall (another province - Ontario!); he"s in both Africa (Tanzania), and in the United States, and in New Zealand... An ideal cover for an international espionage in favor of interesants, subversive and terrorist operations, courier tasks (as a coherent), meetings with other agents and recruitment of new agents.

From whom - if not from the foreign doctors from different countries - it is possible to receive an interesting espionage information? Where, if not at international medical forums it is possible to communicate imperceptibly with the agents from "the main base" and to exchange information? And here Gershkovich - a member of the DHCEU organization thanks to what he"s assisting foreign doctors, with no exception for the country of the "won Zionism".

As a rule, such persons "must" be not strangers in multiethnic environment to be well informed about the moods of different ethnic communities and not to lose sight of any of interesting for customers individual, or, on the contrary, of any of dangerous for them person. And here - Stephen Gershkovich (Hershkovits) himself is admitting to his colleagues - and even makes public statements - that he has a bent for the multiethnic environment and a desire to be circulating in it.

There could be listed many more of the elements of the compliance of doctor Gershkovich to such a type (besides already listed above) though they are not direct indications and prove nothing.


7) "Mysterious" Judith Cohen (as she called herself - or as was printed on a card on her breast): was, not excluded, Judith Sandkharst, or Zandkharst (Judith Sandhurst): a member of a narrow circle of Stephen Gershkovich"s (Hershkovits) close friends in which may be also included such doctors as Peter Steinmetz, Roger Brunner, and Hugo Viladevall. Probably, doctor John Lewis, the doctor-radiologist working in the area of Double Doppler is also a member of Stephen Gershkovich"s (Hershkovits's) close circle. (Exactly this type of medical ultrasound was demanded by me for the evaluation of my vasxular injuries). If all mentioned above people really exist (and my sources did not deceived me), and really are members into a circle of doctor Stephen Gershkovich"s close contacts, it, first, exposes him as a nationalist by his preferences (and - potentially - his links with the "parent base" (on the fact of his choice of friends), and, secondly, explains, how he could threw me out from ER with serious vascular damages and a threat of an embolism and a danger of one of the blood clots to damage the vitals organs, and refused demanded by me diagnostics and treatment.


8) Doctor Stephen Gershkovich (Hershkovits) - is the full namesake of the known American scientist-neuropathologist (besides - almost his age): Stephen Gershkovich (Gershkovits) [Montefiore Medical Center, 111 E 210th St Department of Neurology Bronx, NY 10467]. Whether not therefore Montreal-Cornell doctor Gershkovich never "gives out" his patronymic? The Montreal" Gershkovich's namesake works in the Jewish medical center of a name of Montefiori. One more interesting detail: New-York"s neuropathologist Gershkovich studied in Cornell University Weill Cornell Medical College.


9) Stephen Gershkovich (Hershkovits) - is the great-grandson of the well-known American anthropologist, Melville Herskovits - son of the immigrant from Eastern Europe: David Herskovits. Melville Herskovits was needed to the global ethnic lobby (movement) to fill a niche of American academic circles" fight for the rights of Afro-Americans and for receiving at the expense of it corresponding advantages.

For this reason he, instead of Mr. Dubois, - received the subsidies and grants. In the 1930-s, planning the "Palestinian project" in the first post-war years and knowing about the inevitability of the Second World War, this international movement urgently needed more objective and more specific information on Africa which these extremists wished to receive only from the researcher of a "specific" origin.

For this reason Gershkovich (Hershkovits), instead of someone else - received almost unlimited subsidies for the African researches. He also got financial support for the researches on the island of Haiti. In 1915 M. Hershkovich lived in the big Jewish community of the city of Cincinnati (one of the main Jewish centers of the USA) where entered the university (University of Cincinnati) and the Jewish College (Hebrew Union College), and studied the Torah, the Talmud, and other components of Judaism.

M. Hershkovich also took private lessons from the authoritative orthodox rabbis that allows to call him (without any exaggeration) "a rabbi without peises (side curls)".

Therefore all his activity - it is possible - was a carefully covered action of the world talmudizm aimed at far prospects.

The cultural relativism of Mr. M. Hershkovich (Hershkovits), with all its positive elements driven by Hershkovich himself to the point of absurdity, played into the hands of fanatic nationalists and obscurantist, who were dreaming of such a post-war situation, when nobody should interfered even in the wildest of their practices and traditions, in the "Palestinian project", and in the aggressive nationalist policy of their future "state".

There are statements that M. Hershkovich (Hershkovits) married Francis Shapiro not casually but because wished to connect his life only with a woman of the same origin. Not casually for academic cooperation Mr. M. Hershkovich (Hershkovits) also selected the researchers of the same origin, for example, Mark (Marshall) Segall, who in the post-war years becomes his main and closest colleague.

Hershkovich (Herskovits) and Shapiro had an only daughter - Jean (born in 1935): possibly, the grandmother of doctor Stephen Hershkovich (Hershkovits). (Historian by training).

Mr. M. Hershkovich welcomed with enthusiasm the first Bolshevist ("ethnic") government in Russia, was a supporter of the Communist International, and (indirectly) considered the American black minority as an ethnic base (as in Russia - the Jewry) for "loud" or "silent" revolution in the USA and pressure upon the government.

An intimate connection between the supporters of proto-Nazism and Zionism was shown in the personality of Melville Hershkovich: he was sponsored and advanced by both Ford and Carnegie, and, in the same time, by the Jewish and Zionist funds.

He lived and worked much in Africa, and, in a co-authorship with the wife, wrote the book about the Jewish identity, recognizing a distinctive cultural and historical Jewish destiny. And this is - a lot of - not much - some kind of an academic indulgence on the right to Palestine.

Not casually his grandson or the great-grandson, Stephen Hershkovich, is also closely connected with Africa, lived in Tanzania, a prominent participant of the international programs of medical care to the African countries.


10) There is a small probability that doctor Stephen Gershkovich - is the same Stephen Hershkovich (Steve Herskovitz) who - within the computer SQL-stream technology develops the determinants of the built-in (in cars) GPS sensors for the needs of the intelligence services, for the purpose of espionage on citizens and their movements.

Theoretically, the devices built in cars can be used for a remote provocation of the road accidents for the purpose of elimination of the objectionable persons. A combination of the collection of information from built-in and external devices - and the espionage on citizens and ominous invasion into people"s private life - is one of the priority areas of the total terror developed by modern neofeudalism.


11) In 2012, under the pseudonym HERSKO (in the requisites he"s specifying himself as Steve Herskovitz), doctor Hershkovich has produced his musical solo album "My Mountain". In the advertizing (of his album) he said that he began to be engaged in the piano studies since age of 8, took harmonica and guitar lessons, and participated in a rock group called "Raise It" which has produced 1 album later. He prefers roots-rock/folk/alternative style. He can be quite familiar with my music and albums of English songs. Doctor Gershkovich offered money from his album"s sales in favor of the international charitable medical organization Dignitas International (in which he is the member). This humanitarian organization is number 3 among the leaders of global medical care, and also became famous for some involvement into the scandals with the use of the humanitarian medical care in Africa as some kind of cover for CIA and Mossad operations. LogoDignitas International has huge connections among politicians and even the governments of the leading countries of the world.


12) By the total vector of his diverse activity doctor Stephen Gershkovich (Hershkovits) not at all a "silent" and "modest" attendant of the oath of Hippocrates. The orientation of his total activity is defined easy and unmistakably as potential aspiration to receive as much power and influence as possible. And this, in turn, speaks about a carefully hidden, but standing behind it program of the political and ideological platform. It is difficult to deny that such a person could know about my views, have a hatred towards my ideological position, and also be familiar with my music, sensing either a professional envy, or a rejection, and, this means, to have real motives for unfriendly actions against me.


13) And, finally, doctor Gershkovich (Hershkovits) can quite be a close relative (about what tell also unconfirmed rumors) of the known jazz pianist Mat Hershkovich, citizen of USA living in Montreal since 1999 and cooperating with the singer Lara Fabian and with the musician Julius Turovsky (I faced both in Montreal on the music line), and, thus, to have even more strongly pronounced ambitions, and, at the same time, crossings with me. He also can be a close relative of an anthropologist living in Israel - Israel Hershkovits from Tel Aviv university. In end it is necessary to repeat once again that - even if all this information is absolutely correct and is not present a slightest error, it still proves nothing. Simply his PROFILE is ideally suited under a profile of an agent, and our interest to his person is absolutely justifiable legally and naturally after (in October, 2007) he subjected my health to potential or real danger, distorted and forged objective data on the traumas that I got from the accident, at first completely denying them, then underestimating their gravity, refused to issue the vital tests, and obviously screened the driver of the car which hit me. This caused all the lawful reflections about his personality.


Refusal of my attending physician and all other doctors whom I asked about (to the middle of 2017) a control ultrasound test of the legs" veins - is ideally entered in the tactics of the screening the driver of the white car 988 PPH Quebec which hit me, and Stephen Gershkovich (Hershkovits') sabotage. With this request I addressed to him 5 or 6 times during the whole 2008, and each time was refused. And, he perfectly knew, for what reason I am asking him about the ultrasound test. He knew that my blood vessels were damaged by the car accident - and that I was eager to find out - if the post-traumatic blood clots have dissolved.


If an ultrasound test could reveal long-term complications: then there would be a lawful possibility to make a judicial claim 1) to the driver of the car which hit me, and 2) to doctor Stephen Hershkovits. Once a doctor in a walk-in clinic sent me for the vascular (legs) ultrasound, but, first, in the radiology - they did not do the correct type of the ultrasound, and, secondly, the technician who was carrying out the scan, limited the exam - on her own initiative - by a ridiculously tiny area of only right calf, and, besides, performed it hardly touching the skin surface. Such an ultrasound was obviously non-reliable. It is not viable to consider this scan as an adequate ultrasonography. It is impossible to imagine that the doctors regularly denied me a requisition for a Double Doppler and Duplex ultrasound within 10 years on their own initiative.


It is probable, if they did not obey to instructions "from above", would lose both university chair, and clinical practice, and even own offices and the medical license. Some of these doctors, going around the restrictions, tried to give me "covertly" necessary treatment and medications. Not casually my attending physician [by then and later] - "instead of ultrasound" - gave me in hands Azafen (2 or 3 times - without the prescription, in his own office; and 2 or 3 times - prescribed it). It can be that not only my alternative methods, but also Azafen rescued me from more serious complications of the vascular injuries.


It is necessary to notice that I asked many doctors to prescribe me similar medications, from Heparin to Azafen, but only my attending physician listened to my request, and one more doctor also handed me over Azafen in my hands in his office, without a prescription.


My appeals to different doctors with a request to repeat a vascular ultrasound could draw an incorrect conclusion on my determination to put forward the claim to the driver and to doctor Gershkovich (Hershkovits) whereas (considering that I, in violation of the rules, not descended from the bicycle, crossing the street at a crosswalk) I never was going to submit any claim against the driver, and, as to Gershkovich (Herskovits) - let the destiny reward him according to what he deserves!


According to everything described above - the accident (when a light-color car 988 PPH Quebec hit me); the sabotage of the diagnostics and medical treatment, and the screening (covering-up) of the driver by hospital"s staff: it is possible and necessary to consider further events as ideally keeping themselves within the same row.


Only much later I connected all dots (events), and realized the obvious links.


Indeed, numerous police escorts, stopping by police, searches, police interrogations during my bicycle trips through the city could be - besides other eventual motives - connected with the accident on October 2, 2007.


Maybe because someone, still not dismissing a potential criminal case against the driver and an investigation of that accident, gave the policemen a task to find a "compromising evidence" on me by all means: to present me as not a victim, but as the side responsible for that accident [not even at all in the sense of an unintentional inattentiveness or an ignorance of traffic regulations, but as a malicious and systematic violator dangerous to drivers and pedestrians].


For this reason dozens of provocations and police stopping were organized. It was difficult or even impossible to "catch" me on something illegal, because, despite my opposition to the domination of the activity of foreign interesants and their huge influence on Canadian policy, including municipal laws, I am an ideally law-abiding person, and, besides, expecting provocations and living under a permanent police surveillance, I am not going to break any rules and regulations. (I acted not by the rules - when not descended from the bike, crossing Ponsar Street on October 2, 2007 - the first and the last (unique!) time; and this improbable coincidence, that in this one and only time I was hit by the car: directs at reflections).


But - at all my law-obedience and at all my shifts - the omnipotent enforcement agencies could arrange just everything, instead of waiting and watching.


It is probable (as sadly to realize it) that they did not arrested me "in the act" and did not palm off during a personal search, for example, a false banknote or a stolen flash card only because the Quebec policemen appeared to be the most decent people: NOT doctors, NOT musicians, NOT local writers and journalists, and NOT other "humanitarians".


In the same way, I was rescued from the vicious Immigration"s repressions by the representatives of another stigmatized profession - the lawyers (and - not yet rolled out by then - doctors), - and the journalists and other "humanists", having put the tail between the legs, were baked only about their own skin: while the policemen (and, not excluded, someone in the intelligence services) proved to be from a much best party.


Therefore the attempts to fine me on bicycle paths for the "speed limits violations" (!); for other violations which I did not do; an attempt to hit me on the sidewalk by car (or an imitation) in August, 2008, on Boulevard Pie-IX, and an attack by the same driver armed with a knife on the other day: all this can be considered as the continuation of the history with the accident in October, 2007, and the provocations aimed to represent me retrospectively as a malicious violator, and to present the driver of the car which hit me - like almost an angel comparing to me.


If the whole his guilt was only the aggressive manner of driving (the blow was sharply strengthened because he wildly accelerated from the start) and carelessness, and my traumas were healed [not completely, but...], then of what there was all the fuss? Why and who so strenuously covered him up, and then 2 or 3 years tried to catch me on something to destroy a potential court case against him?


In 2017 I heard from 2 informed people that among the sponsors and doctors of St.-Mary"s hospital are also the thick-headed Christian (and other) Zionists, ideological social racists (who are hating the unprivileged and socially deprived people, and who would wish to close access to free health-care), and the convinced ideological reactionaries (supporters of censorship, police repressions and political tyranny), and they have a considerable influence. This hospital also is under the influence and in the neighborhood (almost a backyard) of an enormously huge Jewish General hospital.


If it is valid information, I, without knowing about it and addressing generally in this hospital, got to the den of those who (on those or other political and ideological motives) could refuse me medical care, or even deliberately undermine my health for political reasons.


They could have information on the content of my refugee claimant file, about my statements and views, and about my voting preferences (for what party I vote on Quebec and Federal elections).


..............................


On November 27 2007 post van of Quebec, L347766, blocked to us departure from mother, having detained us on minutes 40. Houses are found search traces.


CHAPTER 9


OTHER EVENTS.


In this version of my chronicle I don"t describe all the accidents, incidents, injuries, and other traumatic events.


However, some very important events are essential for understanding how the health care system designed to help all patients - independently of their skin color, religion, views, or socioeconomic status, - became not just oriented for serving mostly just the rich and influential individuals, but also a punitive tool, to harm the impoverished, marginalized, objectionable, or disabled people.


SOME OF THE EVENTS IN 2007-2008.


On Saturday, June 7, 2008, about 9.15 mornings, a light-colored car 492-LTJ, Quebec - tried to hit me on the sidewalk. It happened at Pie IX Boulevard, near the house number 6756, near the Everett Street. The driver - the same type (round face, gray hair, dense and massive, like a former bodyguard or a policeman, around my height and age) that hit me by his car in 2005 at the corner of Aylmer and Milton streets, and nearly killed me on Notre-Dame Street when I was crossing on rolling blades.

The first incident happened at the end of 2005 when I still lived on Aylmer St., and a car not so strongly hit me at the corner of Milton and Aylmer when I was returning home from the dépanneur. He was furious that I am crossing the street "as a turtle", "playing on nerves".


A special ominous coloring is given to that incident by the "frequency" facts because another car, with a younger driver, masterly hit me with a front bumper (not to break bones and to provoke only a bruise) at the same intersection in 2 weeks before (when I crossed the street).


Another time, possibly, the same driver (that drove the car with number 492) nearly killed me at the corner of Notre-Dame Street when I was crossing on a crosswalk on green light (for me) on roller blades (December 2006). Among the records, since April, 2008, I found a mention of two "almost accidents", connected with a car with the digits 492. It is very possible that it was the same car.


This time he sharply and violently turned right from the carriageway - through the sidewalk - to the parking space near his house, having appeared near me from the back (so that I could not see in advance the approaching car and its unexpected sharp turn-maneuver towards me) and, undoubtedly, having planned his attack PRIOR to the accident attempt: because the whole sidewalk here is well seen from the road from a very big distance and - consequently - the driver had to calculate and prepare in advance the speed of the car and time of the right turn to approach to the parking space at the same time with me.


That time I went up the street on foot, rolling-conducting my bicycle near me, and, having heard behind a sharp roaring of the car (which, probably, I also saw out by the corner of my eye) speeding up on the sidewalk, I hurried forward trying not to get under the wheels, and fell, having got grazes and bruises. My watch had also broke; the bicycle was damaged.


Instead of repentance or an apology, instead of an attempt to find out, whether I am wounded, the driver of the car 492-LTJ began to shout on me, accusing me, and almost started a fight with his fists: shouting, that, allegedly, I "nearly stroke / scratched his car".


Even before this incident I noticed the same car several times on the road, at different intersections as though the driver went for me on heels.


Exactly in a week, on Saturday, June 14, around 12.25., the same person (the car driver 492-LTJ, Quebec) attacked me with a knife at the same place of Pie IX Boulevard - when I went down on the sidewalk along the Pie IX Boulevard, in the opposite (if to compare to the previous incident) - side - to the Sherbrook street.


The same car, with the number 492 LTJ, Quebec, drove on the sidewalk, and stopped across, having blocking me the way. The driver was not alone in the car; now there were passengers in all sits.


I could not continue walking forward on the sidewalk, because the car blocked my was (the driver did it on purpose), and I could not bypass the car, because I had to step right to the carriageway, and there just were moving cars there.


So, I had to stop for several instants, but, as soon as the cars passed, I bypassed the light car 492 LTJ (Quebec), and went further.


Here the driver ran after me, caught up me from a back and attacked me with fists.


Because of a stressful situation I do not remember well, what shouted to me, when snatched on me.


Though he had a knife in hands (which I realized only after the skirmish), and I had no advantage (neither a weapon, nor an advantage in age, and in spite of the fact that he had the combative skills, I came out the winner. And this happened in spite of my backpack on just one of my shoulder that held down my movements, an umbrella, and inconvenient closes. Having no alternatives, but to defend myself, I had to avoid hurting and injuring him. It is worth to stress also that I had no possibility to punch him properly and tried not to cause harm to him: I had to remember that just any provocation can be use against me by the police and other authorities. So, I had only one option: to put different hands blocks, so, that he did not managed even to touch me (not including a "casual" contact with a knife).


I did not loose control, and did not used my strong umbrella with a sharp tip that could inflict serious traumas to the opponent. Another person, his friend or a relative, got out of the car, and having seized him from behind, did an attempt to stop the incident. However, the attacker was still in the rage, and wanted to fight, but I took an advantage of this situation, and ran across the street to another side of Pie-IX, and took the bus there. Only on the bus, after the confrontation, I noticed a quite deep cut on the dorsal part of my left hand, and it became clear that the driver attacked me not empty-handed. If he would managed to stub me with the knife (for example, in the face): we can only guess, which deep and bloody wound would remain. (Not to mention that he could stub me with a knife in an eye or in the throat). [In the beginning - I believed that the cut was inflicted by something like a razor, but experts argue that this scar on my left hand - on the back side - is from a dangerous knife.]


Such an emergence of this light car with Quebec number (492 LTJ) in a certain, exact place, and in exact time - up to a second, - could not be casual, which speaks for a well-coordinated and professional shadowing, and this, in turn, again brings up - retrospectively - the same question: was the accident on October 2, 2007, casual? Especially - there could not be any "coincident" that this car had appeared on my way at that very moment when I passed the same place both times (on June 7 and 14), and - the second time - was full of people (possibly, members of one family, who would testify in favor of attacker).


The attacker"s features: round face, gray hair, he"s dense and massive, like a former policeman, bodyguard or a judge, my height and age. The incident happened near the Everett Street.


My statement to police, signed on June 14, 2008, I submitted only a month later since I was not sure, if I have to do it, considering an obviously biased testimony of those, who, besides the driver, was in the car. The retelling of both 2 attacks, I made here on an outline of my statement to police of the city of Montreal. (My written declaration to police was submitted to the police station near Boulevard Pius IX).


In this statement I wrote at the end (translated back to English from a Russian translation):


"It would be desirable to receive the assurances that this person will leave me alone, will cease to follow me, to try to hit me by car, or to attack me with a knife. I would like very strongly that he would explained, why: 1) so many times he appeared on my way, exactly at that very moment when I passed certain places or crossed certain streets; 2) so many times injured me; 3) why EACH time, appearing, tried to hit me or to intimidate. It would be desirable to know, whether he has any relation to the accident case in September, 2007, when I was hit by another car, and I got serious traumas.


Whether it is casual - once again - the police did not react in any way to my statement, having completely ignored him?


Broken from blow during falling hours. (See above). The scratched case, the broken-off arrow, broken - absent - glass. On June 7, 2008. Scratches and the grazes got by me as a result of falling on June 7, 2008 when the car of 492 LTJ, Quebec almost ran over me. (See above).


The knife wound 3 months later (inflicted by the "maniac driver", who (the owner of the car 492 LTJ, Quebec) attacked me on June 14, 2008.


5 months after the incident.


As well as in case of October 2nd, 2007 (Tuesday) - when I was hit by brand new white car with number (Quebec) 988-PPH - an obvious coordination of actions between the police (which completely ignored my next written declaration) and the personnel of the ER (covering up and screening the next driver - as it was also in October, 2007) is traced.


After the next incident, on June 14, 2008 (Sunday), next day (or the same day), around 16:30, I went to St.-Mary"s ER. And, again, I could not pass further then the room of the triage nurse. The nurse declared that they have, allegedly, "too many" heavy patients, and that with such a "scratch", "as mine", I "should not" come to ER in general. I responded, that I would like to put the metal stitches ['brackets"], and if not in ER, then where else I can address after being attacked by the driver of 492 LTJ (Quebec) car with a knife and having a knife wound?! I demanded, that she should write down in the report the car"s plate license number 492 LTJ (Quebec) and the biometric features of the driver, who at first tried to hit me by car on the sidewalk, and in a week later attacked me with a knife.


The nurse pretended that she writes down something, but I am not sure, whether she did any official report, and that in general registered my appearance in St.-Mary"s hospital"s ER on June 14 or 15, 2008.


If this report will be found sometime (I already made a list of additional documents which I will try to request from the archive), I will not be surprised, if this official report was signed by the nurse with the name Joanna Priestley who has also arranged the provocation in April, 2015.


[When in 2016 I demanded this report from the medical archive, they did not find anything related to 14-16 June 2008.]


Once again I will repeat (see the previous section) the additional details on the incidents and the knife attack:


On 2 Oct. 2007, I was hit by light-colored car with Quebec number 988-PPH on the street which (if looking at the map) is the street continuation of the street where my mother leaved. It is a symbol. Before the accident - police cars 98-07 and 50-92 were following me. (Even if this accident was coincidental, the police surveillance could make me nervous, and provoke an unusual for me behavior.)


In the parking lot near the driver"s (who drove the car 492 LTJ (Quebec) house (6756 Pie-IX) [he tried to hit me by car, and in a week later attacked me with a knife] my friends saw side by side 2 cars: 988 and 492-LTJ. (It is a pity that another part of the plate license number 988 is unknown, as well as the brand of the car (theoretically, it could be even a van). The police car 98-0 (...) (apparently, 98-07) long before the second incident was following me; possibly, the same car appeared also when I was hit by the first car in 2007.


I will also repeat that the police never responded to my written statements (about the accident on October 2, 2007, and about the incidents in August, 2008). No response arrived from the police; no one contacted me; no one asked me about the additional details, no one called for making additional indications.


When I addressed to one familiar lawyer with wide connections (who had a friend - a private detective), with a request to find out about the name and the address of the owner of the car 492 LTJ, Quebec, the detective left a message through an intermediary that he"s advising to "forget" about the car of 492 LTJ and its owner "as quick as possible".


The same police car 98-07 that was "accompanying" me almost a year ago before (2 October, 2007) I was hit by the car 988 PPH, appeared on June 7, 2008, too, before another incident - already with the car 492 LTJ. And on June 14, 2008 there were both police cars, 98-07 and 50-92, as before the accident on October 2, 2007.


The driver of the 2nd car, who deliberately "almost" hit me on the sidewalk, then intentionally also provoked me, probably, hoping to drive me up the wall and to provoke a fight. Just because I did not give in to the provocation, he attacked me a week later (it could not happen if I was not watched and tracked down at the moment of my approach to his house"s location).


There can not be just a "mere coincidence" - his emergence on June 7, 2008, driving the car 492-LTJ (Quebec) - in the spot + second in a second, - precisely when I was passing the parking lot between the houses where he put his car, and his secondary emergence on June 14, 2008, on the same car 492-LTJ Quebec - exactly at the moment of my approach to his house.


It is necessary to notice that on June 14 the car 492-LTJ (Quebec) approached - second in a second - exactly when I was few steps away from the path to the house 6756 on Pie-IX. Such an exact calculation 2 times, and - thus - at first on one Saturday, and at the second time - next Saturday: excludes a slightest chance of an accidental event. Having the full car of witnesses, this elderly strapper could even kill me with impunity.


After the incidents with the participation of the driver of the 2nd car (492-LTJ) and a knife wound on the back of my left palm, the same surface of the same palm was 3 times inflamed - with the skin reddening, swelling, or a hematoma, - and, besides the 1st "birthmark" which has appeared soon after the 1st car (988-PPH) incident, there appeared 3 more "marks" on the skin.


The photo of the end of 2008. Residual reddening from an inflammation on the central bone, and also the consequences of traumatic change (a groove) from a fracture, crack, or a bruise. The injuries were also received, when it was necessary to defend myself from the 2 strangers who have attacked me near the bridge on Chemin Glenn.


January 17, 2009: the same hand (the same palma manum); next inflammation.


Parallel to the described troubles, attacks, accidents and incidents, all these years I was exposed to numerous attacks and arranged incidents. I was hit by cars; there were simulated or real attempts of accidents and incidents (when the drivers just threatened me, or attempted to hit me indeed); strangers repeatedly attacked me at, as being said, "in the white day"; in the situations of the attempts to bring me down by cars and motorcycles I got additional traumas; the falls from the bicycle and roller blades - or possibility of falling - were arranged (oil poured on a bend; plastic canister with unbent and sharp (as a knife) split edge thrown from the bridge to the bicycle paths, etc.); an unknown driver tried to hit me by his car on the trottoir, and a week later rushed on me with a knife, etc.


Another type of the arranged "accidents" at the plain air or in my own apartment is represented by the American film "The Collector".


MARCH, 2010.


March 10, 2010, 22.00 - 22.30.


Me and my wife, and our daughter - we left the house for the Super C shop.


At Charlevoix - San Patrick Bridge our car was "cut" by the police car No. 15-86 (supervisor). On arrival to Super C parking lot went in Super-S, and I stayed (sitting) in the car. Sometime later the police car No. 80-6 approached; policemen ordered me to leave the car, shone with a small lamp into my face.


12 for March 13, 2010: someone, apparently, broke the plug of the back wheel of my bicycle.


APRIL, 2010.


In April, 2010, Yu."s son, Dmitry, came to Montreal, and we went (all 3 of us) to sight-see the Montreal Underground City. I used this walk as an opportunity to shot the surveillance cameras which have been impudently hanged out in terrifying quantities in several centimeters from passersby"s (or people sitting on benches) faces. (Dmitry is a director of the main state TV channel in one European country, and Yu. is a former film director, and a TV boss.)


Then something as though led my hand, and I struck my elbow at the handrail of the balcony (hinged) avenue in shopping center Canada Trust at the McGill metro station. It is strange that that trifling bruise appeared more serious, than it was expected, and, probably, I made a mistake that did not address to the doctor at once.


However, in a week, feeling that pain does not go away and that the whole elbow is black and swollen, and that outside of the blacknesses the color of the arm is also unhealthy, and that something unusual is going on, I went at first to 2 walk-in clinics where was refused an X-ray, and was not sent to a traumatologist-orthopedist; then - to my family doctor, who also refused me same 2 things. (I do not remember - who of these 2 doctors said that "sees nothing").


Finally, somewhere in about 2 weeks after that accident I came to MGH hospital"s ER, but they did no let me go further then the triage nurse"s office. A doctor was waiting for me directly in the triage nurse"s room, examined my hand, but checked nothing. He declared that I do not have "anything terrible", and that I "can go home".


In 3 or 4 years one of X-rays showed that had an elbow fracture.


A sensation like from a push or a loss of balance during our walks with Yu. used to happen several times. He bragged many times that possesses the "paranormal" abilities, and that, allegedly, "knows" the hypnosis. Twice or three times such episodes were accompanied by short-term or long-term complications, with the symptoms which could point to this or that traumatic damage. Besides these inexplicable episodes, other incidents happened as well causing quite justifiable suspicions of something unusual.


I don"t thing that such inexplicable phenomenon could do something in common with Yu. However, I believe that some political and foreign interesants just used my friendship with Yu to target me with one or another harmful technique. It could be someone from the family of Zhivotovski, or Yu."s former wife, who"s also became an adept of the same extremist ideology, connected to one foreign state"s official ideology.


So, with all serious traumas I used to come to ER, but was denied any medical help, and was compelled to self-healing. Terribly looking bruises, injuries of ligaments and joints, cuts, and other traumas were completely ignored by the medical workers, and I cured the wounds myself, by means of such simple natural healers as salt, soda, ice, cold and heat, chalk, lime, oil, iodine, alcohol, bandages, extensions, massage, exercises, etc.


May 3, 2010.


The policeman from the car 70-45 had fined my wife "for nothing" (driving the car, she did not violate any rule). The same police car "was repeatedly lit" during shadowing me. The penalty payment was demanded almost 2 years later (if I am not mistaken) [a strange and an unusual delay]. We managed to challenge the legitimacy of this fine in the municipal court.


It was impossible to access both "browsing" (to visit network pages), and e-mails for a long period of time. Or, entering my login and the password, I used to be redirected to a sublimate page (that did not even look as mail.ru), in the hidden url of which it was "co.il" at the end. Or, when it was possible already to brake through the logging, the browser got stuck.


It was not possible to detect any Trojans or viruses.


Anything could "hang up" (for example, due to accumulation of different "cache" and other "garbage"): if the system starts not from the "live CD" - I format the hard disk every day, and I put system "from scratch" (in 10-15 minutes). I glanced manually in all corners of my very tiny system (and I know - where to look): nothing suspicious. If (my usual practice) the system works from CD, and the browser - from another CD: then the coordination with the hardware is broken. If I work from the hard disk: then - as I noticed - there is a following: some files of the browser software change their sizes. I.e. - something substitute them. In the user directory Lokal Servis\temp appears the file etilqs_7RseD9bkN1BE83KWecFs which ordinary user will not manage to erase (I can erase it, but then the browser refuse to start). I tried to access my accounts from different computers, even from the strangers, even from a little Internet-shop, but the picture is just the same. I tried to registered another user: everything becomes normal. However, as soon as I tried to log in under my own name: right there all the blockage again.


Sitting in the little Internet-shop - I found in the cache profile (which I completely cleared before the Internet session!) the pages of the newspaper Davar, and BBC version for the same country where this newspaper is issued: though that is clear - I did not visit these pages.


At night from May 31 to June 1, 2010, on the highway, an impressively massive stone was thrown down to our car from the bridge. We have addressed for compensation into the relevant department. A refusal came from there (the letter came from Quebec). The letter was signed by M-me Miriam Ziad (judging by the name - a Sephardic Jew). Police also refused to investigate this terrorist act.


In more details - there was a following: at night of May 31 - June 1, 2010, a massive stone (block) was dumped from the bridge on our car. It is terrible to imagine what could happen, if not an excellent reaction of the driver (my wife) (when the car was due to the blow) or if the stone got into forward "wind" glass, instead of in a car cowl.


In next years I counted 11 terrorist acts against our cars and 10 against our other property. (2 times the car windows were smashed and things were stolen from the car at the most safe spots; 1 time the car was vandalized and destroyed; etc.).


On Wednesday, July 14, 2010, I was once again on a hair from death.


After 23.00 I went with Yu. to a bicycle promenade. We reached the Botanical park and the park opposite to the Olympic stadium. On my way back, having approaching the Berry Street (from park Lafontaine), I stopped on the red light; a car stopped to the left of the bicycle paths - without reaching the control line; as I understood later: to win the maneuver for acceleration and at the same time to lull my vigilance.


In recent months I learned how to speed up sharply from standing, and as soon as a green minuscule bike was lit up on the traffic lights - I already moved quickly enough; here the car suddenly jerked by the forced breakthrough - on prohibitive red light - across me, blocking my way and being placed with such an exact calculation that I ran into its door.


If not my instant reaction it would inevitably happened. I tilted the bike to the right, and braked by the foot, having turned by a semicircle almost on 90 degrees. It turned out as in a circus. The collision was avoided. But the driver and the passenger on the front sit - they made everything to assure the collision. Not only that they went on the prohibitive red light; they (besides) intercepted me with an ideal calculation of my trajectory - which cannot be accidental, - and perfectly considered their and my speed: which also cannot be a mere coincidence.


I was rescued by 3 things: a) my reaction, b) the absence (at my bike) during that moment of the marker lights (which malfunctioned that night for 1-2 seconds, and then were lit again), and c) someone's parked car, which did not allow the terrorists to execute a further maneuver and to take more to the right for overtaking and hitting me at the moment of my turn. The illumination in that place is such that it is visible almost better, than in the afternoon.


Behind the descent after Sherbrook-Berry there was a Metro police car, which accompanied me with my own speed to Viger Street, and further, to the Metro Station Place des Arms. (Front and back lights on my bicycle by that moment were already on).


At the beginning of Victoria Square someone threw a smoke grenade on the road.


On July 18, 2010 (Sunday): a minor knee joint injury after driving on one of Yu."s bicycles with a strange pedal mechanism. If I would not change the position of the saddle - the consequences could be much more serious.


Then: a strange story with an umbrella. On July 21 me and my wife - we were on birthday party by good acquaintances, and in total left our apartment for 4 or 4 and a half hours.


On Saturday, July 24, it became clear that 4 huge typewritten volumes of my diaries on which the whole plot and the text of my novel The Clockwork Doll are built - disappeared. I scanned all 4 volumes about 2 years ago, and the disk with the scanned pages did not vanish. But, first, I am not sure that did not scan selectively, omitting some selective pages, and the whole fragments, and secondly - in addition to the 4 typewritten volumes - there were 48 hand-writing-books (12 sheets each), used up by close, small handwriting.


I do not remember, whether I scanned these hand-writing-books, and if I did, than on what DVD disk I burned the scanned images.


August 1st 2010, Sunday. Walk with Yu.


The police cars 82-2 and 53-3 emerged at the moment of an approach to the Metro and exit from the Metro of Yu.


The loss of balance, when Yu. went behind, up to the state that I hardly kept not to fall. Nothing similar ever happened to me. When - at the stop in the Metro - I went from the sit near Yu. to the car"s door, there was a strange low sound in my ears. This thorn sharply broke, as soon as the car doors were closed behind my back.


On August 5, 2010, there was an incoming telephone call, but the person, who called me, then told that has mistaken the number. However, the name of the Verint company was highlighted on the display caller - the company exposed and denounced in my works: initially an Israel-USA firm, later transformed into Verint and having close ties with the Israeli Mossad and American CIA. (Verint was a major player among the firms, which installed the surveillance system in Montreal"s Metro and buses).


On the same day a drone plane with two sparks: green and white - flied along the Lachine canal. The drone came nearer and nearer, up to here, hanging over the roof of my house.


On Friday, August 6, 2010, the same drone flied for a second time: against my windows. At the moment of its approach I had a slight dizziness.


In the last days of October, 2010, I had an appointment with my attending physician who prolonged the prescription for the blood-pressure controlling pills, and prescribed Azafen (which before handed over to me in his office without any prescription).


On February 26, 2014, when I went to "another dermatologist" (not to doctor Marie St.-Jacques, but to doctor Beatrice Wang - whom I know nearly 13 years), it became clear that the date of my visit in the secretary"s computer agenda is on one day differentiated with the appointed, and that, moreover, I am written down to... to another doctor.


I did not visit doctor Wang for a long period of time, because - after composing her clinic"s phone number I heard the robotic voice message that such phone number does not exist. I called, probably, time 5 or 6 from my home phone, and the automatic voice steadily answered that such phone number does not exist. Some times later a suspicion that my phone was merely disconnected from Beatrice Wang"s clinic (i.e. that my phone access is somehow blocked) forced me to call from a public phone, and I easily phoned on this number from the public phone.


Now, having come to clinic, I asked the secretaries, whether the clinic"s phone number changed or whether it changed temporarily during the last year - years and a half, and received a negative answer.


It became absolutely clear that it were next intrigues by the BELL telephone company, or intrigues of someone in the clinic: Dr. Carrey, Dr. Wang, or the secretaries, or administration, etc. - who submitted a request to BELL to block my access to the clinic.


During the examination, it became clear that the "marks" of the seborrhea keratosis have appeared on my back again.


On my way to the dermatologist and on my way back home the police cars (and other cars with already familiar numbers) were escorting me with my own speed. So, near the Metro, the taxi (09:07) cut my way, and at the very moment of my entrance into the Metro building - the police car 21-15 (09:08) slowly passed by.


On the way back (I walked on foot all the way from the clinic to home), the police car 15-12 stopped at an intersection, in the key point of crossing or rapprochement of 5 streets and the pedestrians path via the canal (i.e. "the major" key point). The policemen observed from this car, how I am passing the canal and into which of 5 streets I will go (10:15).


The same car "cut" me in the same place on February 23, 2014, when I was coming back from my friends-doctors - and (as on February, 26, 2014) was passing the bridge via the canal (14:26).


After the canal (26 Feb. 2014), when I approached half-block to my home - the police car 15-3 (10:27) slowly passed by in a pointed manner.


February 28, 2014: we were called in one public institution for, allegedly, a check up, on what sources we live. There is no need to speak about how odious such a call and a similar "check". I stayed there 28 minutes, and my wife and my daughter: 45 minutes. Having come back home, I found traces of strangers" visit to the apartment. When I turned on all 3 computers, none of them worked (before leaving I turned them off, and disconnected from the socket).


The system recovery in each computer and BIOS settings took away the whole 2 days.


Besides, it was found out that the bedroom door (as "on a wave of a magic wand") ceased to creak. The administration of this network of houses does not allow to put a latch on the apartment door from the front and rear entrance. To hear "uninvited guests" (in extreme cases), I made so, that the door creaked, and this squeak could be heard "on another side of the planet".


As soon as, having coming back, I touched the door, and it was like a lighting in my head: "What the hell is going on!". Right there it became clear that the bedroom door is now not latched at all. The uvula of the mechanism of the handle of the door ceased to enter into the emptiness of the groove opening of a lintel.


I also "missed" 54 disks from my collection of pre-revolutionary Russian films, and this is not a needle and not a grain that could "be gone under a bed".


One week prior to the military putsch ("revolution") in Kiev, all my electronic mail boxes, my Skype, and all other means of communications ceased to work, as one. There are other Russian-speaking, Polish, Byelorussians, and other Eastern-European dissidents in Canada for whom -one week prior to this event - someone "blocked the oxygen". It is possible to assume that someone has a list of personalities, whose public or journalistic activity could choose a "wrong" ("not that") side in the propaganda war. This is just another indirect demonstration that the putsch in Kiev was planned by the foreign intelligence services in advance, and that putchists simply followed their instructions.


CHAPTER 10


MARCH, 2014.


[This part of the chronicle is given without any changes (i.e. quoted according to the original manuscript (from where sometimes it migrated by fragments only to the letters to friends). Further fragments of the original chronicle for the beginning of 2014 with additions were inserted into the articles of this series. Here they are given in an original form, without the notes and additions. Therefore, all events of this fragment are described in the present time.]


On March 3, 2014, came an exterminator to do a prevention "against bugs".


I already wrote about a similar provocation in the previous articles for the end of 2013. And now they repeated the same again.


The young guy, who came to "splash", began (without waiting) to water all corners with the toxic solution, while we were still in the room, and he was himself at this time breathing through a respirator.


According to the instruction from the municipal office, he should splash only in the bedrooms and near the entrance door. But he went in the kitchen where all the food was everywhere at this time (he came BEFORE the scheduled time), and we had to throw it later to the garbage. He also approached to the microwave on the top of which there was a drying for ware.


To act like this, he must be a true swine.


It was necessary (in the winter, in a 20-degree frost) to open windows for 4 hours, and I was walking in the balcony, and then sat in the bathroom which was densely closed during the disinfection procedure and which has its own ventilation.


When 4 hours passed, and, according to the instruction, the toxicity should "evaporate", I decided to wash carefully the dishes and disinfect them be the detergents, and reached for a plastic dryer. Then the tray standing there slipped out from under the dryer, but my reaction was instant, and I seized it in falling. And then there happened something that not expected to occur. A heavy wooden board for cutting the hard vegetables and fruit took off from this tray, and from everything to scope crashed down on a toe of my right foot. Not only that the board heavy, but, still, it, apparently, struck me with the corner.


Later, when I tens times "scrolled" the whole this scene in my head, I could not disprove an assumption that all this "chain of accidents" could be carefully arranged.


During the previous 6 months I spoke twice to my wife telling her that she has to take away the wooden board from there, or otherwise it will fall one day, and will crash somebody"s feet, and she displaced it to the kitchen sideboard, promising that hid it "forever". Once she shared by phone with her female friend that - at my insistence - took away from there this wooden board "forever", and it was enough that somebody extraneous would learned about it.


One more strange, suspicious circumstance: may be this wooden board for cutting the vegetables and fruit was heavy (possibly, not from the heaviest), but it fell not from height of the contour and the microwave oven (where it was put) - but only after I intercepted the tray with it at almost the knees level. How could this board falling from such a small height to fracture a toe?


But all the strangenesses do not terminate here.


I was in the semi-firm slippers and thick socks and nevertheless got such a serious trauma. How could it happen, that the board"s blow, without having left any trace at a slipper, led to a fracture of two toes of the right foot?


My wife denies that hid the wooden board "forever". She argues that, allegedly, remembers, as put it there (having prepared for a culinary task) again 2 or 3 weeks prior to March 3rd, 2014, and then forgot to take it away. But I remember absolutely precisely that - when 3-4, and then 2 days prior to the accident - got the dryer, I saw no wooden board in or under it.


Whether it means, that my wife was mistaken? Certainly, theoretically it is possible, but the matter is that my wife has a very good memory and she"s a very honest person (another woman would not admit it at all).


In that case, it is possible - theoretically - that someone took away this board from there with any purpose, and then, also with any purpose, put it back.


But in that case, what could be a purpose of such a trick? Logically arguing, thus someone could assure me that no danger is present, which would be settled in my sub-consciousness psychologically. Then my instinctive vigilance will be dulled.


Another variation of that theoretical possibility is that the wooden board was underneath of all things, which were laying on top of the microwave dryer, and, naturally, when 2 and 4 days ago, when I was pulling off the plastic dryer, I did not see it. Then, the same day (3 March 2014), someone deliberately put it inside the plastic dryer, purposefully planning to injure a person, who will come for the dryer later.


But who was able to do it? Who could commit such a terrorist act? Could the guy-exterminator ("the splasher") put there this wooden board? Certainly, he could. Could he shift it from one place to another (inside the plastic tray dryer)? Certainly. He had a practical-situational opportunity to do it, and he was capable to do it due to his offensive nature, because he"s a bad guy who demonstrated a vicious behavior. He was angry and furious for some reasons, and was ready to throw on someone his rage. Even if there was no conspiracy, and he acted on his own motivation, he was still capable to arrange such a crime because he"s such a character.


But if even he touched nothing, his emergence ahead of time, and the fact that he, without waiting while the residents will leave the apartment, had began to splash everywhere, and even in the kitchen where people still sat at the table and had the breakfast: it is an outraged non-standard situation, and that person"s actions were criminal in any case, and what happened - happened anyway because of him, because by his actions he forced me (provoked me) to rash to wash the dishes, and my injury became inevitable.


It was inevitably also because it was no salvage from the accident - as I found later. When I later, screwing up the face from pain, approached to that place, checking what would happen, if I reacted differently and managed to draw the foot aside, it became clear that, first, in that recess there was no place where to "draw aside" the foot, and, secondly, the board would simply overtake and struck then another finger. At that very moment there was a packing of small bottles with water on a floor, near the kitchen stove, and it reduced the maneuver possibility even more. Could someone use this situation, prevention against bugs, all this non-standard situation in connection with the accident?


This is how the fracture looked from the bottom on March 4-5, 2014. Suspicion of a complex fracture.


On March 11, 2014, the wound from the blow looked even more distinctly. Its depth and gravity getting more visibility. It is excessive to remind, what terrible pain caused that trauma...


And how to believe in an accidental nature of such a "coincidence" as the toe"s fracture by my older daughter (the trauma, as well as in my case, occurred at her apartment) half a year late (Tuesday, November 11, 2014)?


So, this next cruel incident forced me again (March 4, 2014 (at 6:45) to St.-Mary"s hospital ER, where I stayed till 13:30: 5 and a half hours.


Almost 6 hours of waiting: it was still not so bad; I had to stay there for even 12, and even for 18 hours (one or two times: 24 hours). But this was too long considering the situation all the matter. That morning, 13 people were dragged here with various traumas, and 12 among them came after me. Different patients had the traumas of a different degree; some of them had easier problems (than mine) - and nevertheless they were called in a room to a doctor and on X-ray - before me.


I asked several times, why they call young, healthy-looking patients (who came after me) with scratches or strained tendon - to the doctor, and don"t call me.


Here is my original record on the "hot scents", made in those March days:


"In general, I never saw so many people with traumas in this ER. The best traumatology hospital is not St.-Mary"s, but the Montreal General Hospital".


"The fracture appeared rather serious. The finger awfully swelled in several places, and was deformed from above. I was told that the fracture is only one, and it is the distal phalanx, but I doubt that this was the truth. Probably (judging by external signs; they refused to show the X-ray) there 2 fractures: the longitudinal and on a circle. And, possibly, 2 toes are broken. But why to provide a treatment? I already suffered from so many cases of outstanding, unusually cruel attitude, that - after all my experience - it is possible to believe in any hostile motive. Most likely, it is not only the last external phalanx damaged, but also the next to it (this is why such a swelling, bruise and deformation here), which is closer to big bones of the foot, and, most likely, a joint (a cartilage +) too."


"My request to show me to a traumatic orthopedist-surgeon was denied".


"Now, even if a fracture of this toe will heal without complications, and I could walk normally: I will hardly be able to run quickly, or to run on the rolling blades. And then it will become to surveille me much easier".


"They "threw me out" from ER, having refused to show me to an orthopedic surgeon, to let me see the X-Ray; without having written out any prescription, home remedies" treatment instructions, and without having given any instructions and recommendations, and without considering the post-fracture rehabilitation physiotherapy, and without any follow-ups at all".


"During 1 single day at home a small cone on the very end of the external phalanx (distal phalanx) [from the top party] began to increase; swelling - to enlarge; pain - to amplify... Each one and a half - two hour I put ice for 15 min.; I treated the fracture with the nettle extract, and - when the foot without movement - with the "cretaceous" "cement", sea-buckthorn berries, etc".


"But yet there no improvements; and - on the contrary: the swelling, cone, and blackness from the bottom part did not decrease at all, and the hillock from the top part increases and reddens".


[End of quotation.]


This was the 1-st time, when, after pronouncing the right diagnosis - I received no consultation and no treatment. (When the doctor approached to me, I told instantly that I got the 3-rd r. toe"s fractures, and, possible the neighbor"s toe"s fracture or a crack, too). In all previous cases - if I managed to name a right diagnosis, it helped (at least - partially) to get what I was demanding. I told the doctor that I got a fracture of the proximal phalanx (and, not excluded, a crack or a fracture with a displacement in the middle phalanx) of the r. foot"s 3-rd toe. However, it did not help me to see the X-Ray image and report; to get a consultation with a traumatic surgeon; to receive any treatment (anti-inflammatory, pain-killers, referral to CLSC; etc.) and follow-ups; and to receive the adaptive post-fracture physiotherapy; etc.


When was I not quite indignant, but surprised that she sends me home without any medical summary (theoretically: for my employer, to CLSC, to social worker, and so on), prescriptions, or written instructions, follow-ups, and without consultation of the surgeon, she told me "to take Tylenol and to put ice 3 days each 3 hours on 20 minutes". And that"s all.


It is important to add that - when I asked her to show me the official report of the radiologist, - she declared that they "do not practice it". She even sighed: "Rules are like that". As though she did not approve them.


Later, on reasonable reflection, I thought that she quite could show me both the radiologist report, and the X-Ray image. It was just a pure theatrical performance. She assured me that the fracture is absolutely trifling, without a displacement, and even outlined a drawing, having represented, where and what fracture is.


And declared again that - since it is "the real trifle": no treatment is required, and everything will perfectly heal "by itself".


She even joked that the most important (is): "Don't kick anyone" (do not kick anybody). It will heal. No doubt. You'll see it".


Who - on my place - despite terrible pain and a terrible swelling, - would not peck on this fishing tackle, on this optimistic tone?


And, nevertheless, I asked her to show me to a orthopedic surgeon, but she, having thrown a murmur that the surgeon is occupied on complex cases, did not answer my request - and left the examination room. The nurse then entered, and told me that will give me an injection against the tetanus (which I refused). When I asked the nurse where I should go now (from the examination room - where I was examined by the doctor) - to the waiting room, or to another office? - she answered that now I must go home (though I could not make a step). I was not given any help for moving around; no wheelchair; no crutches; nothing.


It is interesting to note the following. In the radiologist"s report it is specified that Dr. Finestone Debra Silberberg has issued the X-ray. If I am not mistaken, it is exactly what was printed on the identification card pinned on her clothes when she examined me. But I remember that another time on the same card the name Fainstein was printed. Besides, it is unclear, where is the name and where is the surname. Later (below) I list other different names of the same person, which appeared in different medical documents and on her ID cards, pinned to her breast (Rosa, Rose, Deborah, Debra, or Deborah-S. Feinstein; etc.). [It is unknown if she could be a relative of the well-known Jewish families of Feinstein and Silberberg.]


However, I had an impression that sometimes the doctor, whom I knew as Dr. Chrissie Paraskevopoulos, was wearing her colleague"s uniform with the ID card "Faynstone" (Silberberg). [see below for more details] I also had an impression that I had to wait in ER many more additional hours, because, being, probably, on a list of "unwanted" "difficult" patients, I was "attached" to particular doctors (like Dr. Paraveskopolous and Dr. "Faynstone", who worked with me in pair).


I consider doctor"s advice as wrong and misleading. What it was "to take Tylenol and to put ice 3 days each 3 hours on 20 minutes"? How much Tylenol? How to put ice? Ice must be kept not longer then 15 minutes, and to put ice 1 time in 3 hours is the same as not to put ice at all. Ice for just 3 days with an unbearable pain and severe swelling: such an "advice" was nothing else but a mockery. I was putting ice 30 days, first days every 1 hour, and next days on 15 minutes, with 20 minutes break in between, and, still, the pain was strong; the blackness did not disappeared; and the swelling did not completely left the toe even after 1 month.


Really, a "week "just over" (a term sufficient for an initial progress in post-traumatic healing of manual bones) the toe continued to look awfully, and the wound from the blow became even more frightening. (Blackness did not descend from the bottom side!).


It is difficult to understand, how rather a small-size wooden plate for kitchen cutting, fallen from the knees" height (where I picked up the plastic tray dryer with the wooden plate "hided" in it), could inflict such a wound and break a toe, thus, that I was in firm slippers and thick socks:


(see below)


Left Photo: Another view (foreshortening), also on March 4-5, 2014; same conclusions. It is difficult for an extraneous person to imagine, what complex of medical procedures I carried out in self-healing efforts, which multiple and comprehensive means and measures I used for the fastest removal of the edema, "bluish", and wound healing: according to all the canons of the medical science and according to the academic medical books and works of known orthopedic surgeons. It only emphasizes the gravity of the fracture and its "underwater reefs". Right Photo: In couple of days: the swelling does not fall down more than a week; despite all my complex and comprehensive healing actions. The gravity of the wound is visible now even more distinctly.


Medical doctors, looking at these photos will hardly have at least a drop of a doubt that the doctor in ER was obliged - at least - to show me to an orthopedic surgeon.


On my way to the hospital and from the hospital"s ER (my wife was driving me) I was followed by police cars 15-13, 29-6, and so on.


Going back to a theoretical eventuality of a staged accident, it is possible, of course, to reject off - straightly - such a version (of an arranged diversion) as "nonsense", etc., but such mere allegation would not consider some shouting and evident circumstances.


And the motive could be traced, too, taken into consideration political events of a wider picture.


If not to sweep off aside the version of a terrorism act as absolutely fantastic, the events of 6-month's remoteness (on which I already then paid a special attention) come to memory:


When on October 15, 2013 (Sunday) - traces of an unauthorized search (carried out to absence of owners) were again found out at home, the style was absolutely different (which scared and guarded). (See the section of the series of articles The Right to Murder - for 20 October, 2013).


Here the quote from the section for October 20, 2013:


"That time they behaved not as an elephant in a crockery bench, having broken all "labels", but performed the operation much more delicately, with understanding. One more unusual feature: they have turned on both computers - the main and the network-comp. It too can be also related to the health blasting: they opened a database of personal medical records, the schedule of dates on appointment with the doctors, etc. So, a danger, and, probably, a very close tragedy is merely hangs in the air".


"The change of style or tactics of the penetration into the dwelling is really a serious danger. It written so in both detective novels and explained in films "about the spies".


But there is one more reason to try the clothes of the political terror"s victims on myself.


2 years ago, approximately at the end of August, 2011, by some round ways someone sent me an electronic mail with interesting links. A familiar activist provided to materials which affirmed that the wolfhounds of "the biggest democracy" began to apply new method to especially tiresome exposers: to arrange the "accidents" (attempts) directly in the own dwellings of the dissidents, carrying out executions in a special way. The method of causing heavy injuries (it was a question not necessarily of murders), allegedly, consists in the organization of traumas by means of household subjects: kitchen accessories, vacuum cleaner, electrodevices, etc.


By means of a thinnest, but very strong transparent thread which is almost invisible with an open eye, the window slams, chopping the owner a finger in attempt to change its position. At the moment of opening of a door of a kitchen locker a heavy frying pan falls from the top shelf on owner"s head (exact calculation - taking into consideration person"s height, body constitution, etc.). A bicycle suspended on a special holder to a ceiling suddenly breaks from the ceiling on its owner"s back, breaking the backbone. So "someone's special department", allegedly, has a good time.


In the same message there was a reference to the feature film, which, according to activists, is outlining the sinister methods of banks and the intelligence services, and their joint connections with the same political agenda.


In the review of this film it was affirmed that its directors or a scriptwriter (I do not remember) used for a plot such cases of dissidents" punishment. It is an American film "THE COLLECTOR".


It is obvious that this film"s creators transfer the "horror film" genre to the philosophical and metaphysical plane of far-reaching allegories. Though it is a question of fanatic punishments by bankers of their debtors by means of terrible sadists-murderers who are exterminating out the whole families, this film "digs" much deeper in both ideological, and metaphysical plan.


The bloody crimes of the "collectors" (executioners that knock out the debts): it is an allegory on all bank spawn, on these hell"s stooges in the terrestrial world.


But there is also a metaphysical background, with a hint on an "otherworldly" form of the Mercurial broods - Devil"s servants. The same as a witch or a sorcerer bewitches the household subjects by a spell, forcing knifes to fly and to stub a fateful victim, or sending into the head of a victim a hammer which is transferred by air: a serial murderer in this film as though "bewitches" the household objects, forcing them to kill: only not by the supernatural charms, but by almost a magical sharpness, ability, training, and skills.


From here is the allegory on our society which we consider "home" and which was - 10-15 years ago, - really, was our home: rather safe, rather giving a shelter. However, there are no "safe" places anymore after the staged "terrorist acts" and the "antiterrorist" legislation era"s introduction (after 2001) in the world, transformed by the banks, monstrous monopolies, and multinational corporations, into a nightmare.


The pathological murderers got into our homes - the intelligence services, "security" agencies, security firms, private armies, the prison industry of the second in the world "biggest democracy", more and more copying Stalin"s GULAG.


And now they kill and torture us right in our own home (in our yesterday safe and human countries), applying for this purpose "usual", "household" things, and also the health-care and social services as the punitive tools. The whole "unwanted" social and ideological "ballast" (disabled, sick, elderly, unemployed, addicted, homeless people, etc.) can be easily "wiped out" (exterminated), and the exterminators ("collectors") will enjoy the total immunity. The prostitute media, the politicians, and the "public figures" will do "bla-bla-bla", but this all is just a farce and means nothing.


The duel between an extremely dexterous, clever, bright-minded burglar (in this film) - and the murderer-collector (invisible to the viewer) is representing unequal forces. Thereby the film"s directors have showed the horror of the modern technologies even if they appear in the form of a protozoa (at first sight) mechanical adaptations-murderers.


............................................................................


When I could, finally (in one and a half weeks), open my emails, a set of an absolutely new spam, or, rather, a spam of an absolutely different type (than what I used to receive before) stroke my eyes, and some of these emailing provocations can be considered as a threat or a warning of what happened.


When, waiting until the toxic evaporation of the substance, splashed by the exterminator, will disappear, I was "walking" on the balcony, and, enjoying the bright sunny day and fresh frosty air, and being in my best physical form at this time, I went down by one floor down on the "black" ladder, having left the balcony door not locked. As I already wrote in the previous articles of this series, our house consists actually of the 2 houses standing at an angle to each other and connected among by the 2 ladder spaces inside and outside. A ladder which is going down to the yard, is the same for both buildings (for both 2 parts of the house). So both balconies have access to a ladder, and, thus, to each other, incorporating a narrow crossing point...


Even after March 20 (the term comes nearly to a month...) the trauma remained problematic: the swelling up to the end did not disappear; the toe remained almost 2 times thicker that the neighbor toes from the bottom, and also became "longer". Blue also did not heal completely. [Later it came out that the neighbor toe was also fractured.]


In some days (after March 23, 2014): an obvious deformation and 2 "main" directions of the fracture is visible. Even more obviously the absurdity of the refusal in ER of my request to see an orthopedic surgeon.


Left Photo: The next days: sudden deterioration, despite continuous continuation of medical actions (self-treatment) and that the finger was not it is touched, it is struck. Right Photo: At the end of March even the wound did not heal yet, and the tumor up to the end did not descend.


There is one very significant point: if I did not correct a slight displacement of the bones manually (in spite of an inhuman pain!), the toe would remain twisted and non-straight forever. ONLY due to my own efforts I did not became a disabled person. The later X-Rays proved that I did not do any harm to my toe, and the photos are an evidence of the necessity of such a procedure in the first days of March 2014. I improved the residual deformation by other means after March 28, and, again, the X-Ray (May, 2014) shows that I did not do any harm, but only repaired the defects from the fracture that the doctors were obliged to repair, but did not do it. In April, when I wanted to start to go out, I discovered that the fractured fingers does not "fit" in any footwear. And, because I was denied the post-fracture adaptive physiotherapy (I appealed to St.-Marry"s ER and external clinic several times with no result!), I had to do the physiotherapy myself (see later, below).


Now it is possible to summarize the fracture healing progress to illustrate its characteristics and symptoms:


(see below)


A B C


________________________


A - March 3-5, 2014. | B - March 4-5, 2014. | C - March 11, 2014.


________________________


A, B - it was necessary to consult a traumatologic surgeon considering such a swelling from the nail, and blackening behind:. C - after the partial falling off of the swelling it was possible to assume the nature of damages, to estimate the gravity of the wound, the character and the direction of the blow.


D - March 12, 2014. | E - March 20-22, 2014. |


D - plurality and complexity of the damage of the soft tissue is even more distinctly visible in D. The swelling of the neighbor finger and its deformation assumes that there could be a fracture, too (later it proved to be true by an independent X-ray). E - long terms of healing (already soon a month), still well visible bruises and wounds - again specify that the sabotage of a consultation with an orthopedic surgeon was a serious violation of medical ethics and the elementary medical protocol. Besides, here also it is visible that the neighbor toe was also probably fractured by the blow (which a skilled doctor should notice). Besides, according to my advisers, a duty of the doctor was to check the next fingers and to include them in the directives of the requisition for an X-ray by definition.


F - March 23, 2014. | G - after March 24, 2014. | H - after March 25, 2014.

___________________________________________________


F, G, H -

1) it is visible that the injured toe had turned black not only at the area of 2 (proximal and middle) phalanxes, but also at the basis;

2) next photos show that it was not such a simple fracture, and demanded much more attention from doctors, than was rendered;

3) summarizing all aforesaid, it is possible to suspect violations not only of medical ethics, but, possibly, also of the procedural rules: the fact of sending the patient with SUCH a fracture home - WITHOUT

a) examining other toes (which the doctor did not check AT ALL),

b) any follow-ups (it was obligatory to appoint a date of at least one repeated exam), and

c) any instructions, prescriptions and advises; and

d) an appointment for the physiotherapy for the restoration - after fracture"s healing - of the affected toe"s (and other toes") functions.


There was a variety of medical options to reduce my suffering and accelerate the healing: from a prescription of anti-inflammatory, and free-of-charge Tylenol (considering my socioeconomic situation), etc. - to an advice how and for how long to put ice. And, finally, the last, all-important, remark.


If not carried-out by myself medical procedures (which I maintained with an extraordinary persistence and patience) and not my will to restore the toe"s functions (without any medical follow-ups and rehabilitation physiotherapy) - I would REMAIN a DISABLED PERSON FOR CERTAIN. And what is also important: considering the long period of SEVERE pains and long presence of external traces of the physical damage, this situation of uncertainty and fears concerning an ability of the rehabilitation and walking normally - WITHOUT REPEATED MEDICAL EXAMS - doomed me as well to serious MORAL SUFFERINGS. Having no assessment of the medical specialists, I was doomed to psychological torments, staying in a limbo and not knowing what the medical prognosis and which are my chances of the full recovery. And it would not have happened, if in ER they would appoint the follow ups. Not less than one and a half month passed while I understood that the healing really goes to the improvement direction, which means that so much time I was in a hover, feeling justifiable concern in relation to eventual complication of the fracture.


CHAPTER 11


ADDITIONAL OBSERVATIONS.

MARCH-APRIL. 2O14.


All this gives enough ground to connect suspicious circumstances around this r. foot toe"s fracture - with a "special" treatment in the ER in one common chain assuming their interdependence.


On March 26, 2014 I sent a fax of the following contents in the ER office of St.-Mary"s hospital:


From Lev Gunin,

holder of Medical Insurance Card [................................]

and St.-Mary"s Hospital Card [...]

residing at

...... (tel. 514-...................)


TO EMERGENCY ROOM OF ST.-MARY"S HOSPITAL


I am asking the Emergency Room for an appointment with a bone specialist as soon as possible.

I consider it a grave mistake sending me home from St.-Mary"s Hospital"s Emergency Room (March 04, 2014), - without

1) traumatic-orthopedic surgeon"s evaluation of the broken middle toe;

2) any document (medical summary), diagnosis, and

3) follow ups.


After 3 weeks, I"m always in pain; the toe shows no big improvement (still swollen, stiff, black,

and deformed). It is possible that not just a tip top of the distal phalanx was affected, but a

neighbor bone and toe, and (or) nail bed, and (or) joint-cartilage, and soft tissue as well.


Because walking again to Emergency Room poses hardship, and there is no assurance that I"ll not be sent home without help again, I"ll not show up until granted surgeon"s examination.


It is not excluded that the traumatic damage may heal just fine, leaving no serious complications and/or limping.


However, right now it looks and feels not OK, and I am righteously worried, having rights to receive non-delayed and adequate answers, recommendations, and follow ups.

Yours truly,

Lev Gunin


P.S. For saving medical specialists" time and for pre-evaluation, I attach clear and high resolution photos of the damaged toe (taken on different stages of trauma evolution).


Possibly, it is "not the right" tone and "not the right" syllable, but, considering that I felt especially severe pains during this period (approximately from March 23 to March 29), and that at that stage the trauma could seem to the victim (to me) awful and badly healing, this "not the right" receives quite a clear explanation.


No one answered to my fax; no one called or contacted me in any way.


I appealed 3 times in April and in May to St.-Mary"s hospital demanding the post-fracture physiotherapy, but also received no response and no explanations.


All this throws retrospectively a peculiar "bridge" to the events in the same ER office of on October 3, 2007: after I was hit by car. And then, too, they played with me in ER in "leapfrog"...


It is resulting from the official documents that I was examined in the morning, on March 4, 2014, by the already repeatedly familiar to me (see above and below) doctor Chrissie Paraskevopoulos. But I am absolutely sure, that 23 October, 2013, concerning the vitreous body"s detachment, I was examined by the same doctor, while in the requisites of the examination is specified that I was examined by doctor Finosteno.


On October 5, 2007 I got - during one of my repeated visits concerning the injuries - to the same Chrissie Paraskevopoulos, but in the requisites of the exam it is specified that the exam was carried out by doctor Sivaraman Sujith Krishna.


Again it turns out that the medical exam was carried out by doctor with the Greek surname - Paraskevopoulos, and in documents was mentioned a Hindu Sivaraman Sujith Krishna.


Moreover, on October 23, 2013, during the exam concerning the vitreous body"s detachment, the same doctor whom I knew as doctor Chrissie Paraskevopoulos entered into the room, but the breast plate said: "Deborah Silberberg" (or Deborah Feinstein (Faynston) [Dr. Debra Silberberg Finestone]".


An additional strange detail: the exam by Dr. Chrissie Paraskevopoulos is submitted as a "consultation outside of ER" (Consultation Externe) though the exam was carried out within the ER premises, and according to my arrival and address to ER, and the doctor was the same ER doctor, not an "external" polyclinic"s doctor.


Maybe they have "confused" the documents forms? Took "not the right paper"? As though not so!


Another time Deborah Silberberg (Feinstein (Faynstone) not any more "Deborah", but "Rose" Silberberg.


But, if - on March 4, 2014, - I was examined [concerning the toe"s fracture] by doctor Chrissie Paraskevopoulos: why in the X-ray report it was specified that the doctor of ER "Faynston Deborah Silberberg" directed me for the X-ray?!


(see below).


In this document (March 4, 2014), it is specified that the examination was carried out by Dr. Chrissie Paraskevopoulos, but - a strange thing! - the time is not specified. Besides, the form is for an "external consultation" whereas in reality this took place in one of ER"s rooms, and the doctor was a ER"s doctor (not an "external" policlinic"s physician!), and she was assessing my injuries because I CAME to ER.


Through the acquaintances, friends, Internet forums, and from other sources I"ve collected many opinions that the Canadian standards and practices are in a sharp contradiction with all above mentioned "errors" and "mistakes", because here a pedantic bureaucratic approach towards the medical paperwork is dominating everywhere. If so, the imperfect data and other examples of inaccuracy and striking "errors" in my medical files are indications of something extraordinary.


One more "mysterious" detail: lack of any conclusions about the result of the X-ray and reasons about it. On the contrary, a unique "treatment" and the medical "appointment", offered (even not appointed) in connection with the suspicion of a fracture: is an X-ray - and that"s all.


And, by the way, doctor Paraskevopoulos examined me - only having come to ER (it was visible on everything, and, besides, the doctor told that arrived about 10 minutes ago for work).


It excludes the assumption that her shift has ended - and, in this regard, her records ended.


In the column "the final diagnosis" an unclear sign is chirped after which "Fr toe" (a fracture of a toe) is entered. If that unclear sign (similar to a crossed-out circle) is really what it is (the crossed-out circle - that for Canadian physicians replaces the word "no"), it turns out: "there is no toe fracture".


Then - it is illegibly chirped (but I managed to descramble): "distal phalanx".


Improbably, but fact: there is no indication, which toe is injured (it should be entered: "The 3-rd right distal phalanx").


One more absolutely improbable feature of this unique document: is an absence of an utterly natural and obligatory for all similar official reports doctor"s signature and medical license number. Thus, here is not only the license number missing, but also the signature of the doctor, without which (and without the license number) any official medical document is void.


Inconceivable in the environment of Canadian over-bureaucratization and pedantry (strictly observed by any medical institutions and by ALL doctors, regardless of an ethnic origin or the country of birth, or cultural environment - and not conceding German accuracy), the combination of omissions and administrative mistakes: makes this document an absolutely unique sample among the ocean of official Canadian medical documentation:


1) The form of this formulary is for an external medical consultation (was "wrongly"(?) used by "mistake"?);


2) there is no examination time [only time of the arrival to ER is only automatically entered by computer: 7:02 a.m.];


3) it is not indicated, which toe is injured (i.e. it is actually concealed, for what reason the patient came to ER!);


4) it is absolutely impossible to descramble in the column "diagnosis", what is doctor"s conclusion about the fracture: is there (according to doctor"s opinion) a fracture, or it is an injury WITHOUT the fracture (!);


5) there is no doctor"s anamnesis or resume concerning the result of the X-ray and radiologist"s report.


However, the "miracles" do not come to an end here.


Though on my arrival to ER I absolutely clearly and accurately characterized the object fallen on my foot as a "wooden pallet (board) for cutting fruits and vegetables into small pieces", and - for fidelity - repeated the same in French, it is typed in the official 1-st triage nurse"s report "a heavy plate fell on the toe". The same appears in the official report of the 2-nd triage nurse. Someone can say that the characteristic of the injuring object is not of a grand importance, but it is very significant for medical evaluation - because can help the doctor to assess better the character of the traumas.


When Dr. Paraskevopoulos began to quote the specified in the triage nurse"s report details, I challenged the accuracy of this record, which was in a sharp disagreement with my words, and declared that not a plate, but "a wooden pallet (board) for cutting fruits and vegetables into small pieces" fell down to my foot. But in the official report of doctor Paraskevopoulos is mentioned "a heavy plate": exactly as in the official reports of both triage nurses. What or who prohibited or tabooed the mention of the wooden board, and why? If this was a conspiracy, then the accident could be also a staged event (a terrorist act).


Maybe they confused aurally my pronunciation of the words "pallet" and "plate"? Hard to believe, and, after all, I pronounce these 2 words very differently, and, besides, I used the word "board" as well. (I also specified the object by commenting that it was a board "for cutting fruits and vegetables into small pieces", and I repeated the same in French).


One more important detail: both triage nurses were very friendly, lovely and benevolent, and it is difficult to believe in a deliberate distortion of my words by them. Therefore, the most probable: their official reports were reprinted by someone else. The same could also happen with the official report of Dr. Paraskevopoulos.


First, other sheets of her official report could be destroyed (they were absent in the medical archive, or an access to them was blocked for me), and it is possible that the medical anamnesis (following the results of the X-ray) and other adequate medical records could be IN THEM.


Secondly, Dr. Paraskevopoulos could receive an absolutely different - than the archival - radiologist"s report (or written by hand report), and, on this basis, sent me home.


Thirdly, a unique - available to me - leaf of the official Dr. Paraskevopoulos" (who has examined me on March 4, 2014) report can be not an original paper, but a copied by someone forgery on the formulary of "external consultation" (they did not manage to obtain another one or did not have it near at hand?). Dr. Chrissie Paraskevopoulos"s handwriting was forged (or they even merely used just any handwriting) to make a copy or a distorted version.


Fourthly, among the withdrawn and destroyed sheets could be the purpose of treatment, further procedures, follow up consultations with the surgeon, other follow-ups, etc.


In any case - to take or not to take on trust our "fantastic" assumptions: all listed absurdities and improbable for the Canadian bureaucratic pedantry mistakes can easily be entered in the line of the concealment of a diversion (attempt), if not one "but".


Proceeding from all my previous experience, I neither mentioned about my suspicions by a word, nor by a gesture, nor by a hint. Why then had the physicians and other medics to write "a heavy plate" (instead of "wooden board for cutting vegetables and fruits" [whether for the purpose of giving a shade of awkwardness, inadequacy, and uncertainty about patient"s words?]); to hide the time of doctor"s examination; to conceal - which toe was injured; to refuse entering doctors" license number and signature; to avoid any conclusions about the X-Ray results (report); and so on, etc.?


All this mess finds a logical sense only in one - and only - case: if the "suspected" diversion was the diversion indeed.


Our assumptions are confirmed by one more document: Medical Orders, with only 2 lines: ascertaining of my refusal of a tetanus antitoxin injection (anti-tetanus serum), and the reason for an X-ray of toe"s proximal phalanx.


But here is an ill luck: no mention in this requisition about the exact foot (right or left) and exact finger (1-st, 4-th, or 5-th?). How should the radiologist know, which foot and what finger to X-Ray? From the patient? But the patient is just a patient, and might be confused and puzzled, while a requisition is a requisition, and a precise foot and finger should be specified in any medical document. (Or, in case of the suspected multi-toes injury: all 5 toes). It is exactly for this reason they asked me - during the X-ray exam - which finger got into the trouble (and that very surprised me).


But there is one more improbable thing: the license number and the signature of doctor Chrissie Paraskevopoulos is missing in the 1-st document (in the resume of the exam"s official report), and in the 2-nd document (the handwriting - out of doubt - is the same): it is not specified (at all!) which doctor has issued the X-Ray requisition! [It is hard to believe that such a responsibly medical specialist as doctor Chrissie Paraskevopoulos could leave the resolute, "final" ordonnance only for a toe"s X-ray, without entering her name, signature and medical license number; without scheduling any follow-ups and issuing a medical treatment; without entering any instructions for the patient and for medical specialists; without specifying which exact foot and finger should be examined by an X-Ray; without any mention of the adaptive physiotherapy, etc. The most realistic assumption: is that it was only an "intermediate" document, and that there should be other pages which were withdrawn or destroyed, or - that both documents were filled not by Dr. Paraskevopoulos, but someone else.] (See below).


Let's pay attention: there (as well) is neither a signature of the doctor, nor the license number. But, if the X-ray was issued by doctor Paraskevopoulos why in the official radiologist"s report it is specified that Dr. Deborah Selberberg issued the X-ray?! What a masquerade?!


To exclude a surrealistic nonsense, it would be possible to assume that after Dr. Paraskevopoulos I was examined by Dr. Silberberg, or that, at least, doctor Paraskevopoulos finished her work and left home, and she was replaced by doctor Deborah Silberberg. But neither the 1-st, nor the 2-nd assumption does not represent the facts.


The 1-st time I got to doctor Chrissie Paraskevopoulos (before the X-ray): it was around 9:00 - 9:30 a.m. And - after the X-ray (around 13:00) - I was again seen in one of the rooms by the same Dr. Paraskevopoulos. That day I did not adjoin to doctor Deborah Silberberg (Faynston) in any way (we were not crossed). [In spite of the card with doctor"s Faynstone name on the breast ID.]


There is one more discrepancy. After all - I refused an injection against tetanus AFTER the X-ray, and in the document it is mentioned TOGETHER with the X-Ray requisition issuing. And it is one more argument that the both official reports by, allegedly, Dr. Chrissie Paraskevopoulos, were, possibly, copied and distorted much later; not excluded: when I sent my demand to the medical archive during my visit to ER on March 4, 2014. But who and how has forced Dr. Paraskevopoulos to copy (i.e. to falsify) both documents: with a knife at a throat? Or (even more fantastic assumption) - someone else copied them?


In the printed radiologist"s report doctor Chrissie Paraskevopoulos is not mentioned at all, but Dr. Deborah Silberberg-Faynston is mentioned as the doctor, who has issued the X-ray (with the number of her license - whereas the number of Dr. Paraskevopoulos" license is not present in even one-single document!):


And in this document, too, with the radiologist"s report - there is no time (an unprecedented thing!), and there is only a date: March 4, 2014. Whether for this purpose they "forgot" to designate the time of the X-ray: for "not to give out" the time of the examination by the Dr. Paraskevopoulos?


One more remarkable feature of this document is (see above) that, giving the description of an injury of the 3-rd toe by classical for medical literature (in the field of medical radiology) terms, in the final resume the radiologist avoids the word "fracture" without the stipulation "assumed" (in the document: "... that can assume a fracture...") as though someone very strictly forbade to use this word in the clear affirmative way. It puts a doubt about the fracture, which made the whole report almost a forgery.


Whether it is casual that the official report of the triage nurse is printed on an unusual form? (See below).


It differs from all forms I used to receive from the medical archive of St.-Mary"s hospital.


On the sum of the facts - it is still not excluded that Dr. Paraskevopoulos did not send me home yet, and (maybe?) planned to arrange a consultation with an orthopedic surgeon, but was, allegedly, ordered "to leave this idea". It is even more important that not the doctor, but the nurse (to whom I was sent for an injection against the tetanus (which I refused) ordered me to go home. Thus, not the doctor, but the nurse "kicked me out" from ER. And she might be innocent, too, if someone of her supervisors just ordered her to send me home, without allowing she into the details.


It is also very significant, what "connection" had to this whole muddy story Dr. Deborah Silberberg-Feinstein (Faynston), who was presented in different medical documents by different names: Deborah Zilberberg (Silberberg); Deborah Silberberg-Feinstein (Faynston); Rosa Zilberberg; Deborah Faynston; Rose Faynstone; etc.


One more curious prospect is revealed by an X-ray of the same 3-rd toe performed at the requisition of doctor Rohan on May 30, 2014 (when the fractured toe became unbearably painful again in the area of the fracture, and on 30 May 2014 I asked my family doctor to send me for an X-Ray [to see if the bones have healed correctly]):


(see below)


The summary of an X-ray of the 3-rd - 4-th toes of the right foot. (Doctor Ivan Rohan has issued this X-ray in connection with my complaints for non-stopping pain of the 3-rd toe

after the traumatic accident).


In the radiologist"s report it is told:


"Heterogeneous appearance of the terminal tuft of the 3-rd and 4-th distal phalanx. The appearance is more prominent at the level of 3-rd phalanx. Findings may represent post-traumatic changes, such as a healed fracture. No acute fracture identified. Normal alignment of the osseous structures."


So, on May 30, 2014, the X-ray not only confirmed that there was a fracture undeniably, but that the next toe was also fractured. Thus, according to radiologist"s conclusion, not only the 3-rd, but also the 4-th toe has suffered from the blow, and 2 fractures are, naturally, not 1, but something really worst. Besides, if it would be known in time about the second fracture, it would be necessary to do a lot of things absolutely differently; the ice needed to be put to both injured toes, etc. And it returns us retrospectively to the strangest radiological summary on March 4, 2014 (when I was in St.-Mary"s hospital ER.).


On June 2, 2014 I did another X-Ray. The radiologist, an extra-class specialist, suggested that the 3-rd toe had initially a complicated fracture with a displacement, and that the 4-th toe was definitely also had a fracture or a crack. He suggested that a medical procedure (a surgery? a manual chiropractic manipulation?) prevented a post-fracture deformation. Why then the radiologist, who on March 3, 2014, has filled the X-Ray"s report for the ER of St.-Mary"s hospital, mentioned nothing neither about the middle phalanx, nor about the fracture of the next toe?


In his official report it is only SUGGESTED that some shadows and a line CAN SUGGEST the 3-rd proximal phalanx" fracture (i.e. he DID NOT confirm the fracture at all!). Any one, who looks at the photos above, will be shocked by such an X-Ray report. And the doctor, who issued the X-Ray, had to be puzzled.


Thus, the picture was very indistinct and uncertain, and by all means demanded an exam by an orthopedic surgeon. Besides, the swelling on the injured finger was too huge which pointed to a complex fracture: probably, in the 2 - 3 places. Such a swelling suggested that all the phalanxes of this toe might be injured. It is absolutely clear that, having sent me home with such a complex fracture without a consultation with a surgeon and the subsequent follow-ups of the experts, the doctor obviously broke the Hippocratic Oath. This is the same doctor that wanted to send me home without consultation with an ophthalmologist in October, 2013, when the vitreous body detachment happened in the left eye. (This phenomenon has the same symptoms as the retina detachment, and if there was the second, I could lose an eye on her fault).


It was the same doctor (Chrissie Paraskevopoulos) who is mentioned in this chronicle for 2007 events (when only she - one only - channelized me on ultrasound test [which all other doctors denied, participating in the group cover-up of the driver who hit me in 2007 of the car, and refused me the medical care in general, which - due to serious vascular injuries - threatened by the most dramatic consequences]).


And these are not the only cases of very contradictive actions and acts of doctor Chrissie Paraskevopoulos. And, thus, there is a whole abyss between Dr. Paraskevopoulos and doctor Stephen Gershkovich. While in 2014 the situation in medical institutions regressed and became considerably worse, and the system became even less accountable and more inhuman, in 2007 the right diagnostic measures were still offered if you suggested the right diagnosis and demanded them. However, Dr. Gerskovits denied me the right diagnostic test even in the circumstances of 2007. Proceeding from an analogy - after I vocalized the correct diagnosis (vascular damage) and demanded to do the ultrasound of the left and right foot, it was a norm in 2007, but he denied it. It means, he really had some corporate or personal interest.


When I got to Dr. Paraskevopoulos in 2014, conditions, seemingly, became even tougher. Because, even having declared the correct diagnosis before the doctor [a fracture of the 3-rd right toe"s proximal phalanx and, probably, the next phalanx and next toe, - I did not receive any medical care.


It is interesting to note the following.


In the official ER"s radiologist"s report it is specified that Dr. Finestone Debra Silberberg issued the X-ray. However, in other documents from ER (which obtained from the medical archive), it is told that I was examined by Dr. Chrissie Paraskevopoulos.


But, if I was examined by madam Paraskevopoulos, who was Faynston Deborah Silberberg, and on the contrary? (After all - I was examined only by one madam whom I know as madam Paraskevopoulos).


Comparing the handwriting from the drawing (of the fracture) that this doctor made for me (and I kept it for myself) with the handwriting (allegedly) of madam Paraskevopoulos, I came to a conclusion that both were written by the same hand (though, I may be mistaken).


It is difficult not to come to one more interesting conclusion. At each appointment meeting madam Paraskevopoulos tried to be as little as possible similar to herself (she used theatrical make-up and other tricks to change her personality?). I well remember madam Paraskevopoulos: a typical brunette of the Mediterranean type, slightly stouter than madam "Faynston-Silberberg" and is slightly lower, besides, with slightly other shape of stout hands and feet. Another time the same Dr. Paraskevopoulos is already higher (maybe, on "special" heels), in something hiding or less emphasizing the stoutness, and already "not such" an obvious brunette. In the same way, as in 2007 when the same Dr. Paraskevopoulos "was covered" by Dr. Sivaraman Sudjuth Krishna, in 2014 she "was covered" by a double-surname Fayston-Silberberg: or really replaced surname?


And - can be - that doctor who was initially represented to me as Dr. Paraskevopoulos - was actually Dr. Feinstein ("Faynston")? In that case, all on the contrary: madam Paraskevopoulos is a Mediterranean type woman, but less strongly typical than madam Debra (Deborah, Rose, S., etc.) Zilberberg (Silverberg) Feinstein (Faynston), with more light skin and reddish-color (possibly, colored) hair. She has a straight-line "European" (though fleshy) nose-shape and European shape of eyes. [It is probable that doctor Faynston Silberberg and doctor Paraskevopoulos though are not similar at each other, but there is something general crossing-out similar in them. So, in stressful situations (which corresponds to each address to ER) it is easy to take one for another one.]


After that case it became finally clear that I was "attached" in St.-Mary"s ER to certain, same 3-4 doctors, and that, except of them, no one else is allowed to examine me. If all 3 doctors at the same time are absent, I should sit in Ambulance for 12-14 hours (even if I am alone in the waiting room) until someone from these 3 doctors will come to work. And, on the contrary, if one of them showed up, I can be admitted already in 1 or 2 hours of waiting: quicker, than in a policlinic.


These 3 doctors should consist at those who today everything solves, on "the special account", not differently: otherwise them to me would not put.


If I am not mistaken, there are only 10 or 12 examination rooms in St.-Mary"s ER more often. Logically, there should be 10 or 12 doctors (actually, I know from experience - no more than 3-4 at night and not more then 8-9 in the morning and in the afternoon). It must be so, because, it used to happen, that, sitting in the waiting room and writhing from pain, I noted (writing down) the number of unfamiliar doctors, and everything coincides: they should be not less than 9.


(I did not count young intern-stagers "students", though someone from them may be a resident doctor).


And nevertheless the last 4-5 years (2009-2014) no one, except the same 3 doctors, never examined me, and I came to this ER not less than 10 times. (Mentioning 9 doctors, I mean a day time of work).


Having stayed at home without going out (because of the fracture) nearly 2 months, by April 25 I already began to get out slowly to the street though moved with huge efforts. Not only that when walking intolerable pains began; the finger "did not fit" in any footwear, and I walked as on an artificial limb.


Nevertheless, tens procedures and methods of alternative medicine, which I used to return the toe to a normal form and elasticity, and to heal the trauma, already by the end of April began to yield results.


I developed the toe"s flexibility by means of recommended exercises - in water and without; used the "miracle cream"; took calcium with minerals.


I have made at first of a dense cardboard, then from plastic scraps a special coupling which dressed on the injured finger, and for hours walked up and down with it at home, and made another coupling dress for the night.


Since May 2, 2014, I began to go for a bicycle drive again.


All given facts are almost incontestably testifying that the fracture on March 3, 2014, COULD be a result of an arranged (setup) accident [a terrorist act], and that a group of individuals was engaged in the concealment of its circumstances at such a high level on which possible to manipulate medical documents and establishments. Whoever stood up for such a policy (a terror policy), having assumed their right on an attempt at life and health of humans whose opinion differs from the policy of international - a-ism with letter "F", or "S", or "X" in the front (does not matter); on justice, this policy should return to them like a boomerang.


The practices of the attempts and wars (with taken away lives or without) should go to the mankind past. The one who raised a hand on another one should receive the same in reply.


During my whole life I never raised a hand against anybody. I never slapped my children even in a form of a joke-fun. I never raised a hand against my wife. Foes and enemies provoked me innumerable quantity of times. But even by then I did not answer to the "deadly insults" with a physical force. However, if I was physically attacked, I defended myself, but only if I had to protect my life: this is a sacred thing, this is my right, and the right of everyone who underwent an attack, which can result in severe mutilation or death.


Such a behavior (of non-violence) should become the strictest norm for all people, including the secret services, policemen, and other enforcement agencies. Legislations of all countries should define the use of physical force as the most serious crime, regardless of consequences. The similar taboo should be imposed on persecution of dissidents by police, on causeless stopping, interrogations, surveillance, detentions and arrests. The use of attempts at dissidents" life and health, beatings and other similar methods should be considered as the most malicious forms of terrorism. It is time to cancel the right to murder under any circumstances. Only by then people can live their short life properly.


_____________


Lev Gunin


THE PUNITIVE HEALTH CARE

[HEALTH CARE AS A REPRESSIVE TOOL]


BOOK 4-2


THE MISTREATMENT OF MY INJURIES. PART 2. [Mar. 2014 - Jun. 2021]


BOOK 4 - PART 2.


THE CONTENT.


CHAPTER 1

CHAPTER 2

CHAPTER 3

CHAPTER 4

CHAPTER 5


* * *


The whole text of the chronological events and medical documents (under the name of "The Punitive Health Care - (Health Care as a Repressive Tool)" is available for examination only on the basis of the following contract between the author and the reader:


I (THE READER) GIVE MY CONSENT THAT, BY CLICKING CORRESPONDING LINKS AND ACCESSING THE TEXT OF "THE PUNITIVE HEALTH CARE", I AUTOMATICALLY AGREE TO THE FOLLOWING PRELIMINARY CONDITIONS [FOR READING]:


-- I am (at least) 18 years old.


1. I (the reader) is undertaking (commit myself) not to distribute the text of "The Punitive Health Care - (Health Care as a Repressive Tool)" - entirely, or in fragments; not to copy medical documents; and not to share the text and images without author' permission.


2. I (the reader) understand that the confidential information, which is contained in this text, cannot be used for any other [than the reading (extraneous; secondary)] purposes and needs, for any researches, essays, stories, etc.


3. I (the reader) commit myself not to sneer at open ticklish personal information (which sharing was induced by circumstances), not to savor any medical, physiological, or anatomic details, and not to use this text as a reason for mockery and persecution.


4. I (the reader) am warned by the author that, except for a number of obviously immoral (by definition) doctors' and medical staff's actions, other decisions and acts described in this "confession" are not subjected to hasty moral assessment because a) only experts can judge finally about their justification and fairness; b) explanations and vindications of other party are necessary. We also do not know to what degree the doctors were under an influence and direct power of police, Ministry of Immigration, and other enforcement agencies, political organizations, groups and persons - with their own ideological, economic, and propaganda interests, - and to what degree this influence impacted on their diagnostic conclusions and assessments of patient's state of health. Many of the documentary confirmed facts incontestably demonstrate that author's ideological stand (who's opposing to younger generation's transformation into zombie-biorobots with mobile phones on shoulders instead of heads; to electronic totalitarianism with its prison-like total video surveillance; and to the tyrannical political censorship) played nearly a major role in enraging the authorities and triggering the persecutions.


5. I (the reader) am warned that the author sees the main cause of the most dramatic (for him) events in the fact that the enforcement agencies and interested persons and groups managed to present him to the medical community as an individual incapable to evaluate his health condition objectively; as a health-consciousan (or hypochondriac); an extremist; a troublemaker; an individual obsessed with panic and alarm patterns; as a person, who is making unreal demands to the system of medical care - concerning his - allegedly - pseudo-maladies and exaggerated gravity of trivial indispositions. This smear campaign of defamation, scurrilous libel, and wicked calumny made impossible receiving an adequate medical care (and sometimes any medical help at all), and led to health undermining, numerous diseases, incidents, and unnecessary sufferings. Doctors also considered difficult to believe in continuous (not connected with each other) illnesses, with an interval of 4-7 days, sometimes rolling at the same time: as tsunami. They refused to believe in these sequences of illnesses' painful course, danger, and significance. This chronicle disproves such a prejudiced opinion, producing an incontestable evidence.


6. I (the reader) am informed that all negative remarks, characteristics, and facts' assessments belong only to the portrayal of criminal groups, extremists, and carriers of anti-humanistic, racist, and totalitarian ideology, but do not contain groundless generalizations and negative assessment of any country, ethnic group, or religion. The author is categorically against dismantling of any of the existing states, and against restrictions of the rights of religious congregations of any faith.


7. I (the reader) am informed that this edition partially presents the previous 2017 edition without any changes, and, thus, may not correspond to later view and opinions.


8. I (the English reader) am informed that some parts of the following English text of "The Punitive Health Care" - were translated from Polish, Russian, or French originals, and may contain primitive language, double interpretation, or puzzled meaning. Such confusing fragments should be compared with their originals in Polish and Russian languages (author's native languages) [2016-2017]; all controversial points must be resolved through such a comparison.


9. In the very last moment of this edition's make-up (April 2023), the author came across a description of so-called Havana-syndrome, and found same symptoms and complications, which he experienced when was attacked by an unknown remote weapon (3 Nov. 2005, 7 Jan. 2013, and 21 June 2016), and developed symptoms of post-microwave irradiation.


_________


CHAPTER 1.


THE BACK INJURY and ABSCESS.


MARCH, 2014.


On March 3, 2014, I came to Dr. Beatrice Wang (the dermatologist) complaining about 3 skin problems, including an inflammation of the cyst on the center of my back. I demanded a referral to a surgeon, for the cyst removal, and a remedy to treat the abscess. She refused to address the back abscess problem, just told me to apply warm compresses. The abscess tortured me in March-April 2014, and was defeated only due to my persistent and scrupulous and various medical self-treatment. Dr. Wang, always a compassionate and ethical doctor, has shown now a negligent, if not cruel, approach.


JUNE, 2014.


On June 4, 2014, I have come to my attending physician not only to find out about the result of the blood-urine tests and the toes" X-ray (where there was a fracture), but also concerning the another inflammation of the continuous infiltration on my back, around 6-th and 7-th vertebra.


There was whether a fatty tumor, combined with a cyst (my main attending physician thinks that it is only a cyst).


This cyst on my back was formed (as almost all the others cysts and fatty lesions) on an old scar.


I have got this wound under strange, unusual circumstances.


It happened in the first months of the newly constructed Metro (underground subway) functioning in the city of Minsk. (I worked there 2 times a week and studied composition in the Musical Conservatory (High School of Music of the University level) and choral conducting at the Minsk Institute of Culture).


Two unfamiliar guys have stubbed me with something sharp in the back - and have instantly escaped, running.


It happened when I went towards the ladders of an underground platform.


The wound did not heal and then suppurated for a long period of time. The strangeness of that case is not only that - for what reason someone had to stab an extraneous person in the back; or why the hooligans have chosen me as the victim.


If they wanted to wound me seriously or to kill: the consequences would be much more serious. From all the conceivable tools (a pricker, a knife, a probe, etc.) a thin scalpel corresponded most of all to the look and the character of this wound.


But everyone knows, how sharp is the medical scalpel, and with what ease it cuts the sofy tissue. To hit someone on the run with a scalpel, having thus left rather a small cut and having got precisely to a backbone (and I suspect that it was an intended a task of the executors): it is necessary to do it extremely skillfully and with good knowledge of anatomy.


The whole set of such circumstances says that behind that case there were very serious organizers, such, as, let us assume, some people from KGB.


Due to the cyst formed years ago on a back: it was my wife, not me, who first recalled this old incident, and only then it came to my memory, and then I opened my old diaries of the Soviet period, and found the description with some of its particular details.


[2 very young female surgeons, who opened the abscess, have confirmed that it definitely was a deep scar, where the cyst formed.]


I demanded from my attending physician:


а) a referral to a surgeon for cyst"s removal;


b) antibiotics for the prevention of abscess development;


c) a prescription of an antibiotic cream which already repeatedly helped me in the similar cases;


d) confirmation of my self-diagnosis "abscess".


It is bizarre that I was refused all 4 demands - all these 4 points.


The "appointment card" ("coupon") for this rendezvous with my family doctor for June 4, 2014 (see above).


Polysporin bought right after the visit to my attending physician on June 4, 2014. It has not helped AT ALL... The doctor should prescribe at least any remedy, instead of throwing the treatment completely on patient"s shoulders. If sick people have to struggle with an illness: then what the doctors for?


The laboratory test of the abscess"s infiltrate should become a paramount measure (in my opinion) - to know, which medication can help (i.e. to affect the bacterium which has caused the abscess).


If - at the initial stage - it was know that the infection source - is the pepto-streptococci, - it was possible to choose an effective remedy, and not to provoke a surgical intervention.


In the previous years, I asked 3 times the same doctor (and repeatedly 7 other doctors) to refer me to a surgeon to remove this cyst, and each time was refused. He has declared that in the "normal" condition this cyst is too "tiny", and "nobody" "will remove" it.


Besides, he said, there is no guarantee that after the removal the cyst does not re-emerge, and that the surgery will not be in vain. This - the last - argument sounded quite reasonably, however, several already happened episodes of the inflammation of this cyst (with an infiltrate accumulation and the danger of a serious abscess) justified an attempt of its surgical removal.


I did many attempts to receive a referral to a surgeon from dermatologists, and from several doctors in walk-in clinics, and was refused, too.


Once again a reddening (probably, an inflammation) of this cyst-on-an-old-scar (on the back) has begun approximately since May 24, 2914.


By June 4-th it was already transformed into an abscess, as well as in 3 last times.


On June 4, 2014, I have asked my attending physician to prescribe me (concerning the cyst"s inflammation on a back) an antibiotic ointment Fucidin, and even this request was denied.


I have asked him to refer me to a surgeon: again a refusal. I have demanded the antibiotics: refusal.


The attending physician has advised to put warm compresses, but I knew - on the previous inflammations, - that it does not help. I used the antibiotic cream Fucidin, which made the difference by then, and the abscess have dissolved. Unfortunately, I did not have this cream any more, and the doctors have refused me a new prescription. If they thought that a long usage of Fucidin can provoke a growth of a resistant bacteria, then they could prescribe another antibiotic cream, but they did not do it.


Instead of a "real" strong antibiotic ointment my attending physician has advised me to put the Polysporin: if the inflammation - passing to a furuncle or an abscess, then - will open itself.


It was, of course, not that attitude of which I was counting.


I have asked about a requisition for an ultrasound examination - and was also refused.


The attending physician has told me that the cyst is "too small", and "they will see nothing". I tried to challenge it, but have achieved nothing.


It is not excluded that the motivation of the refusal of an antibiotics course, of an antibiotic ointment and of the prescription of other medications was dictated by an attempt to avoid any mention of my health problems in any medical documents, archives, laboratory reports, or pharmacy"s records: i.e. to conceal my next health misfortune.


Another motivation may be linked to mysterious financial claims which were initially announced by a foreign state through the statements of the Federal Judge and Immigration"s Defender during the Federal Court hearing back in mid-1990-s. They claimed that, if we were taken from Warsaw to that country for free: we are debtors of that country for life. However, we were taken there against our will, which was actually a kidnapping, and, besides, 60 thousands dollars and many items of great value were stolen from us during this event. In that country we were excessively exploited and robed, and, thus, on the contrary: that foreign state is our debtor!


Then the financial claims were expressed by an Immigration-related doctor in MCI hospital, in connection with a fake (forged) Immigration "tubercular" fluorography (see in Book 1). Then the financial claims were stated by Dr. Brian Morris, and by 3 other doctors, who denied me the most inexpensive medical procedures (like simple lab tests or am ultrasound), motivating the denial by those procedures" alleged expensive cost. The 3 doctors (before Dr. Morris) expressed the financial claims in 1996-1998 (especially Dr. Brzezinska), when I made so few visits to medical doctors and medical institutions that the public health system was absolutely saving on me. Innumerous suspicious accidents, diversions, provocations, and attacks have started by a suspicious infection 1 Jan. 2001, but, as a permanent series: few days before 11 Sep. 2001 [8 Sep. 2001 I could be killed by fallen objects from one building"s roof], and only by then I had to make much more visits to the medical institutions.


Financial claims to a patient covered by the state medicare card public health insurance are an extraordinary outrage, never practiced and never heard in Canada, and have something to do with my immigration case back in the 1990-s, and with a foreign state"s embassy.


I must also remind (see the book Nr. 1) that in 1999-2004 the Ministry of Immigration has invented (connecting it to financial claims) a fake "medical" case against my mother, using illegal, forged and falsified tests, bogus opinions, and ungrounded insinuations. Knowing that my mother has no place where to go, they made my mother inadmissible (which was done when she already received the Quebec Selection Certificate and was on the stage of being granted Canadian citizenship) claiming that my mother"s state of health will demand too much money from the public health system and social services.


Therefore, it is absolutely clear that the "medical" financial claims are linked to a foreign state and its almighty lobby in Canada, and to many branches of power and control in Canada, linked to that foreign state.


This is why medication were often given to me by good doctors (like Dr. Rohan, Dr. Krasny, Dr. Szego, Dr. Anna Khananyan, or Dr. Marie St.-Jacques; etc.) in their offices without a prescription (because they were probably instructed about me in a particular way); and this is why I was denied medications and tests by some bad doctors; and this is why I heard so many times that a medical procedure or a test, or a medication is "too expensive" for the public health system, and, consequently, I was denied it. I doubt if such claims were expressed to any other patient in Canada.


Applying this particular logic, we can guess that I was denied the Fucidin cream (and was recommended the Polysporin instead) because an antibiotic cream like Fucidin (which fight successfully the streptococci infection) is subsidized, will be given for free or by a reduced price in a drugstore, but the Polisporin is not subsidized, and must available only for its full price even with a medical prescription.


When my attending physician has refused me ultrasound, referral to a surgeon, antibiotic cream and oral antibiotics, and a urine test for microbiology culture, I"ve visited other 2 doctors, who also denied me everything, which I demanded.


Each time when I went to doctors, I was accompanied by 1-2 police cars from my home to the Metro station, and from another Metro station to the medical office, or - by the time of my arrival - 1-2 police cars were already on place.


On June 4, 2014, on my way back from the doctor, approximately at 12.30, in a block away from my home, I was knocked down by 2 youths.


When I have approached to an intersection where the street parallel to mine meets with a perpendicular street, I have seen a police car from which they obviously watched me behind an intersection. Because of other cars (standing in the line) I could not see its board number, and, having decided to find it out, have crossed the street and have passed further forward. In the same second the police car has abruptly wrenched from the place, and, going to the back on good speed, has taxied on the following street, and has dashed away. But I have managed to seize a part of its board number: 15. It is the number of the police station of my area. I cannot tell for certain, but I am almost sure that it was the car 15-1 (or 15-13).


After the police car has dashed away, I have gone back, facing the corner of a corner house, and just at the corner 2 individuals have flown on me and have knocked me down. Where they came from is a next rebus. When I have crossed the street, there was no person for all block, and - if someone would appeared, could not manage to reach from the central street of the area to this corner. After all, I was a bit after the intersection for few seconds. There are no other explanations, besides that these 2 came out of one of the doors of the same house, or stepped out from a car (where, probably, waited for my emergence).


When falling - I have struck the left foot (or it was intentionally hit by those 2), and have "scratched" my back against the asphalt or concrete of the pavement. Next day a mild deterioration occurred: probably I got a new infection from the fall.


Approximately in half a year after those events this history has received an unexpected continuation. Some day, going home from the Metro station, I have seen 2 young very high guys of age under 30 exiting of one of the doors of that corner house, who, apparently, were close friends. They have sat down in a bulky and long American antiquarian car (such as Pontiac), and "have sailed away" parallel to the central street of the area. One was white, other one black. By all the signs it seemed they were that 2 individuals that have knocked me down on June 4, 2014.


But something does not meet; something was not agreed with my experience and with my intuition. These guys looked too nice, and their image somehow did not match that artful incident. It is possible to assume that 2 young bandits very alike them were purposefully chosen to execute that act of terrorism, for - first, if something happens, to lead my investigation on a wrong track, and - secondly simple due to an uncontrollable passion to mockeries and ridicule. Judging by many similar cases, probably, it is a special chic for terrorists.


7 days I struggled with abscess (with a variable success), which on the 4-th day "has broken through". In most of the cases, if an abscess "has broken through", a fast recovery is guaranteed. Knowing all efficient natural (folk) remedies by heart and being able to prepare them, I applied them in the past with invariable success on myself and on others, quickly and completely achieving improvement and then complete healing. I also used warm compresses. Besides, I tried different pharmacy"s medication. I tasted Polysporin, Ikhtiol ointment, and other remedies, which have remained from the last "battles" with inflammations, furuncles and abscesses. But, oddly, this time nothing helped. At first - as though there came a serious improvement with an infiltrate exiting through an opened fistula, - but already literally in the next 3-4 hours there was a filling by the next "portion" of an infection under the skin, and swelling was again formed.


This is how the inflammation looked in the morning, on June 6, 2014. It is possible to notice that the reddening (inflammation) not only concentrates mainly around the cyst on an old scar, but has extended along the whole backbone that testified to wider bacterial infection demanding treatment by antibiotics.


This is how the inflammation and the abscess looked in the evening, on June 6, 2014. Here it is visible that the inflammation began to extend not only along the vertebral deepening, i.e. vertically, but also "in breadth", i.e. in the horizontal length which testified about the serious danger of such an infection. A usual inflammation - in connection with an abscess - is localized in one place, but in my case it was not so. We can only guess about the reasons.


I will add that in my subsequent conclusions I, to put it mildly, have "overestimated" the extent of deterioration after the falling (when I have been knocked down by 2 individuals after the visit to my attending physician on June 4, 2014).


Having looked through a bunch of documents, records, photos and facts, I came to a conclusion that only the suppuration process in the one and only tiny area has "gone uphill" after that incident. But the general inflammation (reddening, rash) then was already shown "in all its beauty". Therefore it should be noticed that on June 4, 2014, outwardly the picture just a little bit differed.


Any one, looking at this terrible picture, will find no words to characterize the fact that 3 doctors have sent me home 4 - 8 of June, 2014 (when I have come with a repeated urgent visit to my family doctor) - without having advised to address in ER; without prescribing oral antibiotics or an external antibiotic treatment against an infection; without sending me to a swab test, ultrasound and X-ray (I explained that the cyst formed on an old scar), and without having named the diagnosis (abscess).


I can only assume that - splashing the saliva in rage - doctor Morris, possibly, used all his improbable influence in medical circles to close for me the possibility of receiving antibiotics through any other doctor. I have understood, what power doctor Morris (after a series of the followed tragic events) has, but by then it did not come to my head yet.


But my assessment of doctor Morris"s actions is subjective, and someone should judge about his acts, his medical ethics, and his motives of behavior: someone extraneous who has no subjective attitudes. Therefore it would be unpleasantly for me if someone - based on my description of events - would developed a demonized image of this doctor. Comparing to certainly unethical individuals, such, as Dr. Daniel Pharand, Dr. Gerskovits, Dr. Sprul, Dr. Anna Crerar (or Tsrerar), Dr. Sermet, Dr. Sejean, Dr. J. P. Rowen, Dr. Nicim Wajjaz, Dr. Benoit Gailloux, Dr. R. Mohindra, and others, doctor Morris in the beginning behaved unethically generally just by his quick-tempered, violent temper, but, unlike those who - under a pretext of imaginary "morbid depression" or "panic" - sabotaged the rendering of medical care in connection with REAL health - doctor Morris at least TRIED to treat me, and did it sincerely, as a doctor who was highly appreciating his profession. Unfortunately, not only his quick-tempered temper and intolerance to others and their opinions have torpedoed this noble mission, but also the politically-motivated hostility towards me (which has taken roots among some physicians who began to influence his decisions and his acts). Otherwise there is not possible to explain in any way many of his actions.


As a result, doctor Morris has not renewed the prescriptions (issued by my previous urologist) of absolutely necessary for me - Flomax, Celebrex, Oksibutyn, etc.; he has refused me transrectal prostate ultrasound or MRI; and later was regularly refusing ultrasound, laboratory tests and antibiotics. 2 types of alpha-blockers and other medicaments could prevent the need of 2 surgeries, prevent the stones formation in the urological tract, and timely issued 1-2 courses of antibiotics: to prevent the whole sequence of chronic infections.


Transrectal ultrasound and CT-scan (the computer tomography), or MRI (as an alternative of a cystoscopy) could confirm my assumption that, as a result of an infection and criminally carried out by Dr. Pharand in 2003 cystoscopy (probably, not only caused a terrible allergic reaction together with a dangerous acute prostate-bladder infection, but also damaged the internal organs and left a stricture, etc.) an obstruction of the evacuations of both the bladder and stomach and intestines contents has developed.


I informed Dr. Morris in an oral and written form about my opinion and about the opinion of my non-Montreal urologist, but Dr. Morris wanted to listen nothing. Among other things, I also said to doctor Morris that my non-Montreal urologist said to me few years that, probably, my problems could be resolved by a surgery (because he, probably, even by then suspected an obstruction), but, unfortunately, I could not react to his words properly by then, and has not asked him for more details about it. It could be a consequence of persecution to which I was exposed, and regular stopping and monitoring by police, which made me worried and upset, and I reacted to doctor"s words differently than could react in my normal state.


Doctor Morris also stubbornly refused to perform a cystoscopy on my conditions (with a preventive course of antibiotics and a guarantee that if - after this procedure - something goes wrong, he promises me to arrange an urgent appointment for me urgently in his office, without forcing me to go to ER (where they apply brutal and cruel treatment to me), and - thereby - has unintentionally closed for me this diagnostic procedure, at the same time refusing also so-called "virtual cystoscopy".


But the most terrible sequence of events happened when Dr. Morris has realized that was wrong and that he has allowed a number of gross errors in both medical treatment and in the medical ethics" code, and began to cover-up his own wrongdoings, for the cost of his patient"s health detriment, and has committed a lot of unethical, brutal, and even illegal actions.


From June 8 to June 10, 2014 I have visited 4 more doctors, and all of them have refused me demanded medical care (concerning the abscess).


Even if 2 days prior to June 6, 2014 the situation would be much less serious (though now I am absolutely sure that it was not so), such knowledgeable doctors (all 8 of them), and, especially, such an extra-class doctor as my attending physician - no doubt - should know what to expect already in the next few days if - after the abscess" examination - will send me home without any medical care.


Parallel to the abscess on a cyst on an old scar, the general process of skin degradation, connected, apparently, to the refusal of the hepatitoz phenomena treatment, to the violation of the balance between the mensual bacteria and allergens, to the development of the opportunistic infections, and the refusal (by the doctors) of the antibiotic therapy to treat the UTI. It is possible to notice on that picture (June 7, 2014) a set of very recently formed skin "marks" of hands, shoulders and breasts which were absent up to May-June, 2014.


The same problems on the back and shoulders. June 6, 2014.


I did not use all the "domestic" remedies available to me to cope with the abscess, and not only because of the extremely constrained financial and social situation. Here was also the impossibility to go for the ingredients purchase, and an abscess in a place inconvenient for independent self-treatment due to what the schedule of applying the remedies was broken, and many other things... So, the antibiotics were absolutely necessary.


On June 11, 2014 I have resolutely went to my family doctor, and have literally demanded the antibiotic ointment, antibiotics, or a referral for an urgent examination by a surgeon. He has sent me to the "Clinic Of One-Day-Surgery" at St.-Mary"s hospital, having written out the referral.


On the same day I have called there, but the secretary have answered that one of THEIR doctors-surgeons must refer me to this clinic, not my family doctor. This was, certainly, a nonsense because, in that case, who should refer me to one of these surgeons, if not the family doctor?


By that moment there has come a considerable improvement. Having verified my records of the events, I have found out that I did not go to the "Clinic Of One-Day-Surgery" at St.-Mary"s hospital not in connection with the temporary improvement (after the abscess has "once again broke through"), but in the connection with the persecutions and the administrative terror.


On the other hand, if even I would personally show up in that clinic, and would began "to sort out the relations" is does not mean at all that the result would be different. Besides - it was not so simple to decide to go to a distant neighborhood by Metro and buses, when you have an awful and very painful abscess on your back.


On June 11, 2014, I also asked the family doctor to arrange an X-ray of my left foot concerning the blow, when I was knocked down - but was refused.


My family doctors" referral to the "One-Day Surgery Clinic" (Surgical Day Center) at St.-Mary"s hospital (June 11, 2014).


Thus, despite a temporary improvement, the basic healing has not occurred. Up to the evening, on June 11, 2014, I still hoped that "this time will be OK", and that the abscess will go "by itself". However after night from the 11 to 12 June, 2014, a very strong swelling, even more tight was formed again, and I called the Surgical Day Center again, and - this time another employee ("another voice") - have refused to accept me.


On June 13, 2014, at 7:30 a.m. I have arrived to St.-Mary"s ER where was with the toes" fracture. I did not have a wide choice: in offices of other hospitals" ER already several times they just refused to accept me, and, after waiting more than 12 hours for not even the main examination by a doctor or doctors, but only for a triage nurse"s assessment or a preliminary exam, I have been forced to leave, and went to a walk-in clinic or in one of the 3 hospitals where they - at least - show me to a doctor: St.-Mary's, Notre-Dame, or Jean-Talon.


The waiting-line number taken on June 13, 2014, in ER.


It has appeared that all permanent premises of office of ER were closed: there was a major renovation-reconstruction. Temporarily the ER was displaced to a wing corridor - where earlier, probably, was one of the "out-patients" clinics, or the utility rooms.


All the permanent personnel from the ER Department was absent (sent on holidays?), and, instead, all doctors and nurses were absolutely new (all: young people).


The patients waited on the chairs and benches directly in the corridor.


No chambers spies, no surveillance cameras, no security guards.


And the treatment (which I received) was CONSIDERABLY DIFFERENT. I passed the triage nurse and the registration very quickly.


And only after that the problems "were drawn". Since the ER have been placed temporarily in the hospital"s northern wing, each patient should put his or her own chart in the plastic holder sideways from a door of this or that room. Someone's medical file already lay there. I was surprised that soon a man not in a while but in dark blue dressing gown (which are technical workers like cleaners or carriers, etc., are wearing) has got one of the folders from there.


When I have approached, I notices that my file is not there any more. In 1,5-2 hours, not earlier, my chart has again appeared in the plastic holder, and, it means that no one still took my chart to a medical office. Thus, someone has deliberately delayed my reception by the doctor for one and a half or 2 hours. If not the repairing-renovation, and the displacement of ER, I would never learn about such tricks.


Another "interesting" question: where the person in dark blue special clothes has carried my medical file?


CHAPTER 2.


(see the copy my request to the Medical Archive (June 13, 2014) below):


A copy of my request to the Medical Archive for June 13, 2014 (see above).


It was the very 1-st time, when there were no assaults, no provocations, no humiliations, no mockeries, no insults. All medical workers were nice people and behaved nicely.


Doctors, medical secretaries, nurses, and even the triage nurse: everyone just did their work, without trying to distort the facts or to deceive. However, the absence of my medical chart, which was taken away somewhere by a man in a deep-blue uniform is throwing a scary shadow even on this positive (in general) experience. Here is the triage nurse"s report (see below):


A copy of the triage nurse report from June 13, 2014. This time - no blatant medical remarks, provocations, etc. Here is only a constructive, working information, and nothing else. No police and Gestapo tricks. No "state secrets", such as a concealment of a name of a nurse or a doctor, exam or procedure"s time. In all records an exact time (not only "general", but also according to the sections) is accurately specified.


Judging by name, the nurse, apparently, is a Latin American origin. She has responsibly and adequately made her work.


A copy of the emergency doctor"s official report, June 13, 2014 (see above). And here, too: no cruel, deceptive, spy tricks. No doubts in the correctness and truthfulness of my words. All the records - are objective; no distortions of my explanations: even when the report is telling that my family doctor has sent me to the One Day Surgery Clinic (Surgical Day Center), and they have refused to accept me there. Moreover, the exclamation mark reflects doctor"s indignation of that fact. Not only doctor S. Cecer, but also other young medics - who were talking to me that day, - have told me that in the One Day Surgery Clinic (Surgical Day Center) they had no right to "get rid" of me if my family doctor had referred me there, but, on the contrary: have been OBLIGED to accept me URGENTLY.


NONE of the pages filled in by St.-Mary"s emergency doctors that day has not been withdrawn or concealed; all of them reflect a high professionalism and responsibility of medical workers.


EVERYTHING was made absolutely correctly and in due time - if to "forget" about an objective crisis of ERs of Montreal"s hospitals and about intolerable and unfairly long hours of waiting. But even here - in my case - is present (not less objective) a justification. The X-ray and the ultrasound procedures, and the blood test, together with the interpretation-reading of the received data: demanded considerable time necessary for results" outcome.


As an example of professionalism and medical impartiality (apolitical objectivity, etc.) - I provide 3 more official medical reports dated the same of the 13th of June, 2015 (see below):


(I provide the copies of these pages as an example of a cardinal contrast to reports, filled out during last years by such doctors as Stephen Gerskovits, Deborah Faystein-Silverberg (ZilberBerg), Donald Sprul, and others: to show, how slaying-like are looking against these purely medical [without any "profiling"] documents the false records of other doctors of the same St.-Mary"s ER, who were examining me before this repairing works.)


One more page of the same on June 13, 2014. (See below)


When, after all, I was examined by a very young doctor (so young and pretty that I have took her for an intern), I have received an exclusive reception and attention.


Before I have managed to pronounce and ask for it, she has already declared (having glanced into my medical file and having examined the abscess) that sends me for an ultrasound test, and for a blood test. (This is what I was also suggested: to exclude a streptococci intoxication of the bloodstream). I, in my turn, have asked, that in any case - will be the abscess surgically opened or not - to issue an antibiotic ointment. She has promised this as well.


Then, soon enough, I was examined by a surgeon-trainee (intern), a very young and nice guy looking like a Chinese origin. And he was also exclusively polite, and I, in my opinion, have received a mutual sympathy. Nobody before him have examine me in this ER with such a care and responsibility. Moreover, he did not make the conclusions "for himself", and did not mutter unwillingly in reply to my inquiries, but kindly and willingly shared his findings. He has told that the abscess is relatively small, but very dangerous and complex, and that he considers: it is necessary to open it surgically. But he has warned that he is a trainee (an intern), and cannot take a decision without his supervisor. He also warned that it may be a long, painful and difficult surgery.


Everything has developed in such a way that it was necessary to wait for many hours.


I (who has got used that in the offices of Montreal hospitals" ERs my words were always met with irony, mockery and sarcasm) was struck and touched that this young surgeon has not even a single thought to doubt my story of how nearly 30 years ago I was stubbed or pricked with something sharp in the back in Minsk"s Metro, and how years later a cyst has formed on top of that wound, and how it began to be inflamed 2-4 times per year.

------


CHAPTER 3.


Running forward, I will notice again that later 2 girls-surgeons who were carrying out the surgical opening, have confirmed a trace from that old scar.


I was taken abide that, instead of an ultrasound, I was called for an X-ray. But it has appeared that the doctor has appointed both an X-ray, and ultrasonography. I have quickly realized, that exactly my narrative about the events of almost 30-years back has provoked this X-ray test to check the integrity of the vertebrae bones. (The incident took place in the same year when the Minsk"s underground Metro (subway) was just constructed. Then after that stubbing there was a small suppuration, and years later a cyst was formed).


Naturally, even if I was stubbed or pricked 30 years ago, all the same it was necessary to check, whether any bone has suffered from a blow of a scalpel, knife, pricker or needle.


While I have passed all tests and while has waited for a resident doctor, it became already 16:10. I have stayed the whole day on the corridor, on an inconvenient chair, and, moreover, few hours it was necessary to stand simply because the chairs did not suffice for all the patients (I must remind that the permanent premises of ER were under reconstruction).


It is necessary to add the pain from the abscess and the psychological intolerableness of the waiting. Besides, I ate nothing the whole day, and did not drink at all (and to drink, when you have an abscess, is necessary much more often than usually).


Finally, the "main surgeon", surrounded by the whole suite flock of students-trainees (interns) has come. It has appeared that this (reminded a Chechen) still quite young and polite man, speaks Russian! He, too, has treated me very much friendly and properly, talked to me very kindly, and has explained everything extremely clear and laconically. I will repeat that yet did not see such a warm reception and such a friendly treatment in this ER. This surgeon demonstrated a real human approach. It is a pity that I stood all the time a back to him (because he was examining the abscess on my back), and had no chance to see his name on his identification card.


"The main surgeon" has told that it is definitely necessary to open the abscess, and has asked me, if I agree. I have nodded.


I was told to climb up a high surgical table-couch, and the trainees (interns) have crowded around me: the same Chinese-looking intern guy, and 3 girls by sight 22-24 years-old, so beautiful as from Hollywood. Right there was also the head doctor (the "main surgeon") who was speaking Russian. All tools have been prepared, including scissors, scalpel, etc. On the same iron support a syringe with Novocain has been prepared.


And here, when they already were literally inclined over me to begin the surgical operation, something has unexpectedly occurred. Suddenly all of them have disappeared in the next room, and the last girl - before leaving, - has warned me that I should not stand up since they "right now will return".


I guessed immediately if such a turn was the man"s in dark blue uniform (who, on the order of someone, who knew the expected events and counted on such an occurrence) purpose, and this is why he took my medical chart somewhere to postpone a very expected surgical procedure for 1,5 - 2 hours: to provoke a surgery carried out by inexperienced very young surgeons.


I have lain in an inconvenient pose more then 20 minutes, then have jumped off on the floor. It was senseless to remain farther in such an uncomfortable pose. Voices of 6 or 7 people were distributed from the next room. Unclear, why one or two of them could not perform the surgery while the others confer.


Then one of them showed up and told that some of them were called for an urgent operation (including the "main surgeon") and that I have to put on my clothes, and to wait again on the corridor. It can take 2-3 hours, the Russian-speaking surgeon has told me.


Something really bizarre and very suspicious occurred. I never heard that a patient was ever sent away from an operating-room"s surgery table, and could I not find (on Internet) any similar event in Montreal. And the very fact that it happened not to someone else, but to me (to a person, who already had bizarre and unusual experience in the Emergency Rooms): sends a chilly frightening signal.


Soon my wife has arrived there. And no wonder: I already was sitting there for almost 11 hours! She was also shocked that I was sent away from the operation-room, where I was already lying on the surgical table in the operation position, and the surgeons have almost started the procedure. We were even more confused, when saw the "main surgeon" on the corridor, where he not supposed to be, but supposed to perform an urgent surgery (for which, allegedly, they all left me, and ran to save someone"s life).


It was so scary to have an operation under such unusual circumstances, that I began to hesitate if to agree for a surgery today. Later I have caught "the main surgeon" on the corridor, and have once again asked, whether a slightest possibility for a conservative treatment still remained. He looked also confused and disturbed by something, and I saw a sort of an uncertainty in his eyes, which could be provoked exclusively by something really extraordinary in such a good, positive man. It is possible that he was considering - which danger is greater for me: a threat of something unknown and disturbing (which sent me away from the surgery out to the corridor again) - or a danger from abscess" complications.


He has answered that if not to open the abscess right now, it will be much worse. Now I consider that he was absolutely right.


When 3 or 4 young doctors have returned, I was operated by 2 very young girls one of whom has told me (I did not ask her, but she felt something, or just prevented possible questions) that she is a resident doctor, not an intern. She told that speaks French, English, Spanish and Arabic (which was a surprise, because she did not look like an Arab not only due to her secular look, but also because of her light skin, and more likely European features; probably, she was a Christian from Syria).


Another one, most likely, was a Scottish origin.


Both have asked, how I managed to keep an excellent form at my age.


It shocked me a little, when the "resident" has approached to me with a scalpel in her hand, "having forgotten" a syringe and Novocain on a little table. She has answered my puzzled question by stressing that an anaesthetizing injection is almost as painful, as a cut, when it concerns an abscess or a furuncle, but I have insisted. I would like, I said, not to have a heart attack or not to faint from the pain-shock - and to get to reanimation. I have also asked to do an injection not in the abscess directly, but slightly nearby. Especially (I have added) that the freezing works so much better.


She has agreed with it, but has noticed that not even every doctor knows about such specific details, and I, for some reason, know.


I also have asked to make a drainage cut lengthways, instead of across, and the different depth, depending on abscess structure. And she has agreed with it, too. The shot of Novocain, was, really, terribly painful. And, even after the freezing, I felt every cut as though the she cut "on live", without the local anesthesia. But that"s such my fate: to suffer.


I have asked to make an attempt at the same time to find and remove the cyst if it is possible in the conditions of present suppuration. The girls have told that it is hardly possible, but that they have found and have removed something that may be a cyst though completely are not sure. They also have warned me that - before leaving (before going home) antibiotics should be prescribed for me.


On my request to take the infiltrate"s sample (to see if this is a streptococcus, staphylococci, or any another infection) the girl-"resident" has taken right there a special tool - and did it. She has told that if any special resistant microorganisms will be found, someone will call me. All my requests have been executed. Improbable!


The result of ultrasound (June 13, 2014). Is that possible to compare THIS report to dishonest and biased results of ultrasound vascular tests in 2007 (after I was hit by a car)?! Here everything is characterized accurately and clearly. Any half-words. The abscess, fortunately, has not extended out of limits of the top layers, has not got into the muscles. Its exact sizes was precisely specified. Abundantly clearly that this official report "is not politized". (See above)


The result of the X-ray made on June 13, 2014, in ER (St.-Mary"s hospital). (see below)


The microbiological analysis (culture) of the infiltrate sample - has revealed (June 13, 2014) a gram-positive pepto-streptococcus which only at the 1st looks like a typical for "all" abscesses bacterium. For, having studied a list of those types of abscesses where this bacterium usually appears, we will hardly find a mention of an abscess on a backbone. Pepto-streptococcus, as well as the entherococci (which was already found in me twice!) - is a gram-positive opportunistic commensal infection (i.e. such that, first, is a symbiosis of 2 organisms [the bacterium and the host] - and, thus, represents a normal flora; and, secondly, provokes an infectious pathogenesis only in an organism with a weakened immune system, or with a chronic infection, etc.) . One more of its features: the pepto-streptococcus is an obligate anaerobe, i.e. it is tolerant only to a limited presence of oxygen (if I am not mistaken, a unique streptococcal infection of that kind). Therefore, its presence in an abscess "instead of" a "normal" streptococcal infection already - in itself - puts on guard, and that the pepto-streptococcus was not destroyed after some days (before the surgery), when the abscess "has spontaneously broken through" and had a drainage (and, it means, the oxygen began to get to the opened fistula in concentration that definitely exceeding 8 percent) - is doubly strange.


Any abscess on a vertebral column, even the most microscopic one, is considered life-threatening, and demands an immediate course of antibiotics or an opening surgery. ANY doctor is OBLIGED - even without patient"s demand - to apply IMMEDIATELY medical measures to urgent treatment of an abscess (which is always bearing a threat of a bacteremia (blood poisoning), penetration of an infection into a backbone, etc.) on the spinal column. And, if this was not done: this is an emergency. But that on June 4, 2014 my attending physician and 7 (!) other doctors have refused me ANY TREATMENT and, in particular: to appoint - concerning a spinal cord"s abscess - antibiotics, to prescribe an antibiotic cream, and to refer me to a surgeon; this was an outraged violation of human rights, not only a medical mischief. And the refusal of St.-Mary"s hospital"s Day Surgery Clinic to allow me an access to a surgeon, when my family doctor has, finally, issued such a reference: this was an even more serious incident - this already was a criminal offence. (I can assume only that the main responsibility for these crimes lies on doctor Morris and on others, similar to him individuals: who in literal sense have blocked for me an access to antibiotics).


When - after the cut - they began to squeeze out the abscess" contents (if I am not mistaken: a disputable technique [risk even a bigger infection?]; but an unequivocal opinion in this respect does not exist; in a retrospective: this was the right decision, because, if the Pepto-streptococcal infection has not disappeared after the self-opening of the abscess, such a method has prevented a new recurrence), - I did not stop them though the pain became simply other-wordly. I read in the surgical literature that sometimes it helps.


Generally, up to this point everything was correct both with from the human, and from the medical perspective: for the first time during a long history of my visits to this and 2 other ERs. But only up to this point. Because literally one second prior to the bandage, which was placed on the wound, the "resident"s" phone has revived. After that call, I think, all troubles have started. Outwardly no changes occurred. I have asked to put an antibiotic cream to the wound (if they have it). The "resident" has told that "yes", and that she will satisfy my request. But when I have asked, where to come for changing the bandages, she has answered that the abscess is small enough, so, I can just to take it off in 2 days [the bandaging "sticker"]. (It would be a mistake to consider this answer as an indication that 2 female doctors have sent me home without any prescription, instructions, and a schedule of follow-ups). They also told me that - before leaving home - SURELY to address in the registry, and to receive all the "medical appointments" there, and not to leave without obtaining all papers and instructions.


Than I have asked them how to wash out the wound after bandaging removal. It was responded to me that simply "under a shower, with a soap".


I don"t know if their supervisor would do a better job (after this surgery my back looks so terrible as if it was a major surgery there, not an operation to treat a tiny abscess), but I believe that they did everything correctly and according to all existing norms, with human approach, and as good as their skills and experience allowed them.


Nevertheless, I have asked to refer me to a CLSC nurse in my area. Later, judging that I left the hospital without any referral, ointment and antibiotics, I have made a wrong conclusion that my request was - softly - but rejected. However, when I, having obtained all the copies from the medical archive (for June 13, 2015), and undertaken studying them, I have found (see above) a referral to CLSC in 2 similar documents; thus, not specifically to the nurse for the bandagings, but in general under CLSC"s observation. If I am correctly informed, 2 copies of the referral to CLSC - is a usual practice, because 1 copy is intended to be given to the patient, and the 2-nd one: for sending directly to CLSC.


From the same source I know that if a patient, leaving the ER, has not received this or that document, prescription, or instruction, this patient surely should be contacted within 12 hours. But nor from CLSC (which testifies that nothing was sent there), neither from the hospital nobody has called me, and this is already a triple sabotage.


After the surgery I tried to find out in the registry, where the prescription of the antibiotic ointment issued to me, antibiotics and the referral to CLSC, but achieved and received nothing. I had to go home without ointment, antibiotics, instructions and the referral.


A non-standard situation (the repairing works in ER unit) and the concrete combination of the circumstances have presented a unique possibility to reconstruct the whole mechanism of sabotage of medical care and blasting my health.


First: a man in a dark-blue non-medical uniform takes away my medical chart for 1,5-2 hours, which, possibly, resulted in surgery"s delay, which, in turn, led to a situation, when the surgery was performed by non-experienced surgeons. Secondly, I was sent away to the corridor-waiting-area literarily from the surgery table in the operation-room, where the surgery procedure formally already started; nothing like this ever happened to any other patient. Thirdly, a phone call to the operation-room (where I came now the 2-nd time) has actually interrupted the completion of the surgical procedure: possibly, an urgent call of 2 young girls-surgeons from the operation-room (where they have performed the abscess surgical opening on my back). [A possible purpose of this call might be to tear off their communication with me, and - in the conditions of a time trouble - not to allow them to explain in details how to deal with the post-surgery situation, to issue all necessary documents, and to organize and order all post-operational procedures.]


After that call, possibly, there was no time for them to write out the prescriptions and the referral to CLSC by their own hand. It is possible to assume, that they have issued these medical appointments "on the way" "through" an ordinate or triage office (or etc.), or have entrusted to someone else.


When I, accompanied by my wife, came to the registry, there was a shift turn, and we had to wait. Then the registry"s secretary sent me to the waiting room twice, ordering to "wait". Then she was replaced by another one (probably, the shift change) who spoke to me absolutely differently: roughly and impatiently as though I was accused of something, and has flatly refused to find out, where the referral to CLSC for me and the prescriptions.


After she literally "kicked" me out, I have not left all the same, waiting again for my turn, and have addressed to her again. Then she has demanded that I leave the hospital building immediately, and have added something else that I have not caught so well, but I assume that she has threatened me by police or security guards.


I describe all this in order to explain, how much time I have spent in the registry secretariat (quite enough for my medical file [chart] - together with all the prescriptions, instructions, post-surgery follow-ups, and the referral to CLSC - to arrive there) and also in order to show clearly that I was roughly expelled from the hospital (not to mention that my forces were on an the verge of extreme fatigue and fainting, and I had to leave for this reason as well).


What happened with the referral to CLSC and with the prescriptions, and why I was refused them in the registry office? Were those documents withdrawn, too, by the "person in dark-blue uniform", or the sabotage has been organized at the level of the registration nurse-secretary? And why - even if I was refused the referral, and could not take it myself to the destination, - the hospital did not sent this referral to CLSC through electronic communications, which, as far as I know, happens automatically, regardless patient"s demand. (In next days I called there 3 times, and, still, achieved nothing).


If the referral has been sent - as it was obligatory - I would receive a call from there have surely (nice and obligatory people work in my CLSC).


I could not go home neither by bus, nor by Metro; my wife have called our daughter with the car. In the car I sat not fastened, across the sitting, by the sick back to the window: otherwise it was impossible.


CHAPTER 3.


2 next days the pain was such as if a scalpel cut was just done a minute ago. The wound burnt under the bandage terribly, burnt down with fire. I was sitting on Advil, but even the anaesthetizing did not help.


[Here I must add to the description in the original (written right after the real events), and to its 1-st edition - the following conclusions (on the basis of complete audit of photos, documents, records and other sources). 2 young doctors, for certain, issued the referral to CLSC, and prescribed the antibiotics and the antibiotic ointment, and have taken care of the organization of bandaging in CLSC, but, by means of some bureaucratic and organizational dodges someone has arranged a sabotage. It is possible to assume that partially it have been arranged by means of the medical secretary who was on duty in the "reception window" of the temporary ER office of St.-Mary"s hospital. She, despite my statements about the "guaranteed" by doctors referral to CLSC, antibiotics and antibiotic ointment, ordered me "to go to me home", "to leave the hospital building immediately", and "not to take away time" from so overloaded medics.

Then - before going home, - I asked the copies of the results of ultrasound, X-ray, and infiltrate"s microbiological culture, but have achieved nothing.

Thus, the medical personnel was not responsible for the guilt of non-medical workers, who literally sabotages all post-operational procedures, prescriptions, and follow-ups. For the first time for many years I was treated properly in ER, and everything was made from the side of the medics just ideally. Conclusions what can be made of this comparison, are given below.]


When 2 days later I have removed the bandaging, I have seen a terrible picture. The back was mutilated as if I have went though inquisition"s tortures-nippers. A characteristic for abscesses red-pinkish layer has again spread around the wound, but now 3 times wider than before the surgical procedure. The abscess not only has not disappeared, but became almost 4 times bigger.


Having looked narrowly, I have found out that the surgical opening has been performed satisfactory (I cannot tell more, without being the expert).


(A tiny cross-section cut, contrary to my objection, has been made after all, and now was of use a bad service [when I asked the 2 young surgeons not to do it, they promised to respect my wish, but, still, did it], but about this: later, below; however, if the registry"s secretary and other hospital"s workers would have given me out everything that doctors appointed - everything the whole healing procedure would go in a different way).


The major problem was made not by scalpel, but by the policy in relation to bandaging. It was necessary to change the bandage at least 2 times per day, instead of 1 time in 2 days. From here arose the terrible state of the wound with the got-out rags of skin and meat: a bigger swelling in the centre of the abscess has formed, and has literally turned the cut inside out.


A special gauze with a sticky strip along the edges (on the perimeter) has been pasted on the top. Under it - a special medical fabric (a rectangular shape) has been put on the wound. Everything is correct. It is strictly in accordance with the protocol. But this "rectangle" has been bended half-and-half (that already in itself obstruct the infiltrate"s outflow), and though, probably, it has also been made according to the norms (a surgeon or a surgical nurse could confirm or repute it), but - when the top, protective gauze, has been taken off - it has appeared that it pasted to the wound in a special way, not letting the pus and lymph get out.


In my opinion, solely a vertical cut would do a better service, and the tiny horizontal cut has done a disservice.


Thus, the main reason of deterioration after the surgical opening and drainage consisted in the complete absence of the post-operational measures: it was necessary to do the bandagings (possibly, at least 1 time, or (better) 2 times per day); to prescribe antibiotics and the antibiotic ointment; to refer me to CLSC; and to give me the additional instructions.


On Monday morning (June 16, 2014) I went to a walk-in clinic. Reconsidered, I exited from there and at first have come into another walk-in clinic, in 10 minutes of walking.


There were just few people there; in 20 minutes I already sat in an examination room. The doctor has been shocked that in ER they did not appoint the bandaging. While I have reached the policlinic, the wound looked even more awfully: there were fat blood streams around, lymph and infiltrate. Even the doctor was terrified. But nothing was done for me. My request for antibiotics for external and oral use - has been refused by the doctor. He insisted, that I must go again to the same ER where I was operated. I was forced to go to another policlinic.


The view of the abscess in 3 days after the surgical opening.


The view of the abscess in 4 or 5 days after opening.


The view of the abscess on June 18, 2014, i.e. in 5 days after opening.


It is well visible that the abscess was - and remained - "untouched".


And it all happened not because the surgical opening and a drainage were made inadequately.


First, I think that - by the time of completion of the operation by the girls-surgeons - they already known about the causative agent of the infection (pepto-streptococci). Knowing that this microorganism perishes in the open air (at oxygen"s concentration of above 8 percent), they have advised to take off the bandage in 2 days - and later to refuse the bandagings.


In reality something was wrong with it, and, without the CLSC"s observation and the antibiotics, the abscess was again restored. Whether "mine" pepto-streptococci has appeared resistant against the oxygen, whether this bacterium had multiplied too quickly, whether a "help" to it was arriving from another place, whether my organism sent the antibodies for fight too intensively (forming the "pulp" products from streptococcus"s disintegration favorable for an infection) - but an improvement after the surgical opening was minimum, and the situation threatened to return "into place".


I will stress that if I - after the surgery - have learnt at once that the causative agent of an infection is pepto-streptococci, I would organize bandagings so that the wound should "breathed" more, and, having seen that progress is minimum, would demand antibiotics even more persistently.


On June 20, 2014, I went to the medical archive of St.-Mary's hospital (my wife took me there by car), and has demanded the copies of all documents from ER for June 13, 2014, including the infiltrate analysis (the microbiologic culture test) in an URGENT ORDER. They refused to hand me over these documents, and, after I filled again a special form, I was told that they will send those copies by mail. However, up to 10 of July, 2014, no copies arrived. By this cruel act the hospital"s archive have deprived me of learning about the essential things, which could help me to heal myself in a situation when I was denied ANY medical help.


Then I went to the same archive repeatedly, and my first application (as well as its destiny) was not found. They demanded from me to fill newly the same application form (again), and to wait again. (See above, the file abscess-med-archive1.jpg).


The requested documents have arrived by mail only on August 13, 2014 (2 months after the surgical intervention, and almost 2 months after my 1-st request to the archive!). The norm - under the law - no more than 30 days from the date of the application. It is interesting to notice that I have not seen any post stamp on this envelope, though studied the surface from both sides under a magnifying glass. Does it mean that the letter was delivered by the courier, and was thrown into the mail box? But then how the courier could get to the entrance: the door is always "on the lock" for strangers. It is the postman who has the keys. In that case, the courier should call - and to hand over the envelope to me, but this envelope has been thrown into the mail box. It is obvious that they used a doubtful (if not illegal) trick to do so that I should not have any proof on what date this envelope arrived.


A number of documents definitely were missing, especially these, which could explain how they could send me home without antibiotics, antibiotic cream, access to CLSC nurse bandaging, and other essential medical measures and documents, and without them my suffering was artificially turned into the torture that lasted 8-9 months and left a number of complications (dermatological complications, more scar tissue formation, new profound wound or even wounds, esthetical disfiguring of my back, and many others). I believe that it was a part of the oppressive McGill medical administration"s persecutions "program", and that I was punished for who I am and how I see the world.


So, the epic of abscess has thrown me under the real torture only because of 1) refusal by my attending physician in the timely direction to the surgeon, antibiotics, the recipe on antibiotic cream, etc. (see above); (it is probable, it is connected with overlapping(blocking) for me of access to antibiotics doctor Morris) 2) sabotage given out finally (though with huge delay) my attending physician of the direction in Clinic of Surgery of One Day secretaries of the above-named clinic; 3) sabotage of delivery to me the antibiotics appointed by emergency doctors, antibiotic ointment, the direction in CLSC, and copies of analyses; and, at last 4) sabotage of delivery to me in time copies of medical documents St hospital archive. - Mary's. It is impossible even to assume that all these cases could be separate events, instead of result of well co-ordinated and politically motivated persecution in medical institutions of the city of Montreal.


In November-December 2014 another abscess appeared on top of the former one, which was surgically opened in July. I could not get an appointment with my family doctor, but was seen by Dr. Wang and 2 other dermatologists. Dr. Wang again refused to do anything for this problem"s solution, and other dermatologists demanded 100 and 150 dollars for unknown tests and for another foreseeable medical procedure. Without any clear explanation about this, and having no resources to pay for an expensive private medical program, this was not a solution.


I did not ask the same Dr. St.-Jacques (a compassionate and conscious doctor-dermatologist) in 2014 and in the beginning of 2015, as she already did too many favors for me. The same is concerning Dr. Richard Dubuc, another dermatologist, who helped me a lot, but retired probably in 2014 or in 2015 (Dr. St.-Jacques also retired soon, despite her relatively not retirement age).


In autumn 2015, and in January-February 2016, the cyst on my back with the scars from the abscess surgery has inflamed again, and both times I had the appointments with Dr. Wang, who refused to help me again.


In 2015-2016 I demanded a referral from my family doctor to a surgeon (to assess the cyst on my back and to remove it), and he refused it again. I believe that he just could not do it this time. I had tremendous health issues in 2015-2017; he did for me many favors, and was not able to provide for me an unlimited help: this is how this system works. Dr. Wang, however, as I suggest, could refer me to a surgeon, could administer an ultrasound test (if she doubt my self-diagnosis "frequently infected cyst") and, at least, a course of treatment of the abscesses. I had an appointment with Dr. Wang on 4 February 2016, at 10:00.


The same concerns 2 other dermatologists and doctors in Westmount Plaza, rue Guy, and other walk-in clinics, whose refusal to render any medical help was just an act of cruelty.


In 2016 - 2017, I had a tremendous health drama, artificially provoked by Dr. Brian Morris and by other doctors, and the case of the frequently infected cyst on my back has receded in the shadow. However, on July 20, 2015, at 14:00, I saw Dr. Wang again, and address to her with a number of problems, including the frequently infected cyst on my back. And was refused a referral to a surgeon again. Having no help from Dr. Wang on absolutely all issues, I came to Dr. Viviott (dermatologist) with few very tormenting and acute problems, which overshadowed the inflamed cyst dilemma.


On September 21, 2017, I paid an emergency visit to MetroMedic walk-in clinic due to a serious infection inside my finger after a cut. I also demanded help concerning just another infection on the back, on top of the same cyst. Dr. Roger G. Guy, an aged doctor, has ignored my abnormal suffering, ignored the badly-looking state of my R. Hand index finger, ignored the radiography report, ignored a badly-looking inflammation or infection of the back (on the cyst), and refused any prescription and a referral to a specialist. I demanded an anti-inflammatory medication (to address the issue with the finger) and, at least, an antibiotic cream for the back, but he cynically scoffed at me, proposing some tests in a private laboratory or clinic, and, when I said that I am not able to pay, demonstratively expelled me from the room.


The radiologic report ("focal bony lesion or soft tissue abnormality evident"), which Dr. Roger G. Guy ignored.


The timing was a factor, and, while I was trying to get an appointment with another doctor (who was trying to help), the damage to my finger became permanent.


On October, 6, 2017, visiting my family doctor, I asked him if he can refer me to a specialist concerning the inflamed cyst, but he ignored my question.


In the end of October and in November, 2017, Dr. Wang seemed to be more compassionate, and accepted my more frequent visits on October 26, 2017 (9:00), November, 7, 2017 (9:40), and November, 27 (14:15). She told the diagnosis, prescribed medication, but, concerning the cyst, did nothing.


______________


THIS IS THE END OF THE ORIGINALLY WRITTEN IN 2017 SCRIPT/

THE NEXT PART IS AN ADDITION, WRITTEN IN 2018-2021


______________


CHAPTER 4.


Visiting Dr. Wang on April 9, 2018 (15:45), I raised the question about the cyst again, and was denied any help again.


While visiting Dr. Viviott on 9 October, 2018 (17:15), I - for the first time - asked Dr. Viviott about the infecting cyst, and she did not respond to my request.


In 2019, I visited clinic LaCite twice (I lost my notes about the precise dates), and both times was refused any medical attention concerning the cyst.


On July 27, 2019, Saturday, a heavy and heavily loaded HRV car with 2 passengers inside went on my right foot. This day, there was a wedding of my younger daughter. But on the same day, before the departure for the wedding (70 km from Montreal (a restaurant in an old watermill of 19-th century) this happened to me in case of improbable combination of circumstances.


When I approached to the car to climb up the seat (having widely opening, until stop, the side rear door), the car suddenly moved forward, having run (by its left rear wheel) on my right foot, and stopped precisely on my foot.


If the wheel just rolled through my foot, it would be not so terrible, and the injuries would be milder.


Any explanation why it was necessary to move the car slightly forward and to stop immediately - does not exist.


Despite my inhuman shout, the driver reacted not instantly, and not too quickly understood what happened, and then got out of the car - to see, where to move the car (forward - or back), to free my leg. So there passed about 3-4 minutes until the wheel moved down from my foot. And it, clear, aggravated the injuries.


The heavy car (HRV) - some kind of jeep - was, besides, with the trunk loaded until the limit by heavy bags (we went to the wedding!).


It is a true miracle that such a heavy car did not crush my foot and did not shatter it into small-sized pieces: in spite of the fact that I was not in some heavy-duty footwear, but in the cheapest semisoft sneakers. But, if to recall - how in 2007 an equal or even more massive car, roaring by its motor, hit me on maximal starting speed, and I, having flied over the cowl on the other side (having landed on both legs), and got off only with the severe bruises and vascular injuries of both legs, without having hurt anything else: there is nothing more that should surprise.


Incomprehensibly, how the driver could not note but ignore a widely opened (until stop) side rear door, an opened trunk door, the passenger"s absence on the rear seat, the indications of electronics (the DOOR is OPEN!), and, in addition, before his maneuver, he looked back - as though was going to move the car backwards: and, so, he shall see, in principle, that I am standing outside.


It is necessary to add that I was still talking to my daughter, concerning the cardboard box lying on the seat, which did not allow me to sit down immediately (otherwise I would crush the box and everything in it): I asked where to move it away. My question was also directed to the driver (that"s why I spoke French), and it was clear that I did not get into the car, and that my legs are somewhere near the wheels.


If someone else was the driver, it was still possible "to believe" in the incident and his guilt (negligence, etc.). But, in this case, it is just impossible to believe that it could occur. I am absolutely sure that he is a good person. It is clear both on everyday actions, and at the emotional level. He is a very disciplined and self-disciplines person. And he is a responsible driver. Everything that he does - he does fundamentally, with responsibility and understanding. He is a technical, rational person, an athlete, with an excellent reaction, response, and attention, and a very good-trained driver. Therefore, it is possible to conclude that there was something terrible not only considering the incident itself, but in the sense that something incomprehensible has happened to him. And it happened in the presence of the guests from Israel...


When, at finally, the car moved from my foot, I cried that I must be carried to a hospital, but, having removed the footwear and the sock, and seeing that nothing like a fracture or a deadly injury was manifested, I asked to bring ice, bandage, and iodine, and went to my daughter"s wedding, where I played the keyboard for the guests. We stopped by at a drugstore, bought a bandage, ice package and iodine, and on the road I held ice, doing a break every 15 minutes, and then about an hour or more at the hotel room.


Then there was no opportunity to put ice: the wedding ceremony, the meeting of guests, etc.; it was necessary to hobble on the crushed leg all the time. We forgot to buy Tylenol, and it was necessary to smile to the guests, overcoming the pain.


But there was more to come. In 3 days prior to the wedding, an electrical motor scooter nearly flew on me when I stood on the sidewalk at an intersection. The sidewalk"s level in that place is equal with the level of the carriageway, and this motor scooter, turning to the right, cut off an angle directly on the sidewalk, so, that helmets of two men sitting in saddles, having tilted a baking plate by the strong angle, passed somewhere in millimeters from me. I recoiled, and, having stumbled, experienced the knee pain. So - now it was already the second injury.


Around 2 months the right foot was swollen and covered with terrible hematomas; the blood vessels injuries, in addition to the injuries of 2007 car incident, brought another wave of suffering. I could not step of the right foot, and (in the beginning of August, 2019) my older daughter took me to the clinic on Sherbrook East Street, near St.-Denis and Berri.


I was seen by a young and relatively tall (normal completion) white doctor-Quebecer, who refused any medical help and even recommendations. I have addressed to him not only with the foot injury, but also with the (again) inflamed cyst on my back, but he just kicked me out.


13 - 23 October, 2019.


Saturday, the 12-th of October, 2019, we had a party on my grand-daughter"s 2-nd birthday.


Next day, the 13-th of October, I was eating darker grapes, when my wife added to the same plate a lighter part of grapes left after the birthday party. We had an agreement that, if she brings some food from outside home, she has to tell me, but this time she forgot to do it.


I was listening to an interesting radio podcast, and was taking the grapes from the plate automatically, almost without looking, distracted by radio, and noticed different-color grapes too late (when already took few of them). Each of more light grapes was cut half-and-half (for children, who came to the birthday party).


When I noticed it, I became frightened and worried, because I know that any infection, flu including, can be disastrous for me. I had so many infections, and took so many courses of antibiotics (more then 50 in just last 15 years) that my organism"s autoimmune reaction became dangerous by itself.


In 2016, the level of leucocytes ones reached almost 30 thousands, and afterwards the whole blood formula was deregulated (even more then before) for almost 2 years. Only very recently my blood tests showed normal results on all the components, which is a small miracle, and now I was hoping that they will stay like this if no other infection will attack me in the recent future. I am catching flu rarer then the general population: once in 4-5 years, and very benign. Sometimes all members of my family become sick, except of me.


I was also so afraid also because in last 2 weeks my hearing has started to degrade more then before. When I used to listen to my player (music or radio), I put the volume to 11, and that was enough. Then - gradually - after 2 last weeks even 15 was not enough. I suspected a vascular impact. So, I worried that in such a situation a flu can cause a father damage to my ears.


I was also afraid of complication, which could affect not only the blood formula again, but the cardio-vascular system, ears, eyes, and could trigger another arthritis attack (as a side effect of the autoimmune system"s response).


I was also worried, because around 3 weeks ago my wife poured tomato juice into my cup, filled by a dishwasher liquid, and put the cup on the table, at my place. I made two throats, before my reaction has stopped me. Since then I felt something like a foreign object in my throat, and sometimes painful voice strings, which could become a gateway for an infection.


I immediately ate a small piece of garlic, drunk a glass of tie with honey, and so on, but it did not help. 9-10 hours later I got a very serious flu.


(Besides the infected grapes, there could be one more source of an infection. As early as on October 13, 2019, I felt that something is pricks and stirs in my right foot, but the flu knocked me down, and immediately became so grave that forced me to forget about all other sores. In the evening, on October 14, 2019, I found a huge splinter, which was sticking out of the foot. It was a very thin metal stick appeared from who knows where. It is interesting that the splinters appeared in my feet uncountable number of times, and all this happened at home though I always wear slippers and socks. But no one from my family members or from friends and acquaintances ever got a splinter into a foot in our apartment though they walk in socks or in generally barefoot. The order and purity in out apartment is ideal. We sweep and wash the floor 1 or 2 times per day. It is like a mystery.)


6-7 hours later I started to feel a sore and painful throat, and other symptoms of an acute flu. It appeared that it was a severe flu, which brought cough, sneezing, strong cold (followed by arthritis after few days), aching bones, and pathological weakness. The weakness and fatigue soon became so strong that I could only walk to the bathroom and back - with great efforts.


I lost the sense of smell, and my cough was very profound, while I am never coughing when having a flu. When I was 17 years old and was diagnosed two-side pneumonia: even by then I did not cough. This was the most unusual and untypical flu in my life.


The pain in the gorge has intensified so that I could not swallow, and spread to the areas behind both ears. The pain has spread to both ears, and, after, has expanded to the temples. From Monday evening or Tuesday a pain in the right carotid artery appeared, and became strong enough. Simultaneously, there was also heart pain. When my head was down - I felt an enormous pressure behind each ear, and pain in my right ear and right side of my head. Hours after massaging the carotid artery I succeeded in making the pain to disappear.


Then came a sharp acute pain in my right ear after some of the strongest coughs or sneezes. Twice even a stronger pain paralyzed me when I involuntary cleaned my nose with minimum efforts. And then the right ear was blocked. It happened Saturday evening, 19 Oct. 2019. At night, in the horizontal position of the body, the ear used to unblock itself, but in the vertical position it appeared to be blocked again. It also had a temporary unblock moments in a response to swallowing or turning the head right-left. However, in the morning, the ear became unblocked, but with a certain hearing loss. Same day, around 17:30, the ear suddenly became blocked again, without any particular reason, and stayed blocked. This time the right ear was not only blocked, but also became almost completely deaf. Every time the head moved down, it was accompanying by pain in the carotid artery, and in the temple bone right beside the upper part of the auricle. When I put the head down, I felt also a huge pressure behind each ear; it is like there is something about to burst there.


Tuesday, 23 Oct. 2019, I went to MetroMedic clinic, on the corner of Sherbrook and Guy. I was there at 9:15 - 9:20 a.m. I received a sufficient medical help and a referral to an otolaryngologist.


Later I realized that (by symptoms and other indications) it was so-called Covid-19, one the SARS infections. I was infected 4 months prior to the pandemics and the arrival of Covid-19 to Canada. It is a very disturbing and suspicious fact. Besides, I was infected exactly during the Quebec provincial elections, and was deprived of the rights to vote.


My assumption that I had Covid-19 in October, 2019, is backed up by the fact that in March-November 2019 I visited hospitals and other medical institutions innumerous times (due to the new injuries (which I got under the suspicious circumstances) and their complications), without being infected. It took place on the peak of the pandemic surge in Montreal, and I visited Verdun Hospital dozens times when it became the most affected by Covid-19 hospital in the city, an epicenter of the infection. It could mean that I already had a natural immunity against Covid.


I am not sure about the connection between this flu and the revival of the back"s infection, but the flu in October 2019 coincided with the cyst"s infection recurrence.


The cyst, which (after the last infection) was not palpable, now became visible and was growing, and, probably, was already infected.


I am also not sure about the connection between this flu (most likely, Covid-19) and a new lesion on my back, which appeared 1-2 years ago, and started to grow in October. This lesion was the most frightening, because it reminded a melanoma. This type of lesion must be removed immediately, because represents one of the most dangerous forms of cancer.


CHAPTER 5.


On 28 Jan 2020 (Tuesday - 11.30), I came to Dr. Viviott with 4 troubling lesions. The most dangerous at this time was the one described above (in the previous paragraph). I presented it not as melanoma (being afraid that Dr. Viviott would address this characterization to "exaggeration" and "anxiety"), but as an acrocordon (tag).


Dr. Viviott has refused to remove problematic lesions; told that the less expensive one single operation on the back will cost around 100 dollars.


I did not demand to remove it; I just asked her, if it is dangerous. First, I thought that she said "it is dangerous" - demanding 100 dollars for removal. Later I started to doubt that heard it correctly (due to my hearing problems). Maybe she said that it is NOT dangerous. However, if this lesion is not problematic, and poses no danger: why should she raise a question about the removal, and demanded 100 dollars (we also discussed the price and my inability to pay the "ransom").


Dr. Viviott said that the other lesion on my back (the frequently infected cyst) is not quite a dermatological problem, and I should go to my family doctor or to a walk-in clinic. I said that I am not demanding Dr. Viviott to remove it, but I am asking about a referral to a specialist, which she can easily do, and that, since 2006, I am demanding such a referral from my family doctor, from the doctors in the walk-in clinics, from ER"s, and I am always refused.


The lesion on my back (resembling a tag, but, in the same time, a melanoma when injured), which was disturbed by the clothing, was injured, started to bleed and to change its appearance. 28 Jan., right after the visit to Dr. Viviott, it was already an irritated, bleeding lesion, and next day became inflamed. Since January, I began to apply iodine.


After receiving no help from Dr. Viviott, I went to my family doctor. (21 Feb. 2020 (Friday) - 8.30). He again ignored the frequently inflaming cyst on my back, but, after examining the alleged "tag", said that it might be a melanoma, and that it must be urgently removed. He was terrified and indignant that Dr. Viviott refused to remove this dangerous lesion, and even demanded 100 dollars for this procedure. But especially he was revolted that Doctor Viviott did not tell (to me) - where to go, and what to do, if I cannot pay 100 dollars. He arranged an appointment with Dr. Wang for February 26, 2020. In his note to Dr. Wang he did not mention the diagnosis "melanoma".


Before seeing Dr. Wang, I sent her clear photos of 3 problematic lesions (as the cyst on the back was deep inside, and could not be seen), including the tab resembling melanoma.


Coming to Dr. Wang, I noticed a thin chart, and in this chart Dr. Wang"s note: r / o (rule out) melanoma (see below):


Thus, after evaluating the photos that I sent to her, Dr. Wang made a conclusion that this could be a melanoma, and wrote down: rule out. Or, maybe, my family doctor, an extra-class multi-fields specialist, after all, sent her another message (which I did not see before): rule out melanoma. In both cases, it was a very serious patient"s health problem, because, if even this lesion was not a melanoma, but looked as melanoma and was an injured lesion: it had to be removed obligatory.


In spite of my family doctor"s dramatic letter to Dr. Wang (one that I saw), she did not remove the most threatening lesion on my back (which was bleeding and looked terribly).


Actually, she was ready to remove it right away (immediately after seeing it; I noticed that she is even panicking), but demanded 300 (or 30?) dollars for this procedure. I believe that doctors like Dr. Wang are so disconnected from reality, from ordinary people"s life that she could not assume that I might mishear the number, or that people on welfare like me might not have even 30$ in the end of the month (which is for her a ridiculously miniscule amount).


Only when I said that I am not able to pay, she refused to remove it, because did not want to do it for free.


When I complained that when I am leaning (while sitting), or I lay on my back, this tag becomes red, painful, sometimes inflamed, and I must treat it by iodine. Then, how can I dry my skin after shower, if any contact with a towel provokes this lesion's bleeding?


My explanations did not changed Dr. Wang's mind; NOW she claimed only that it is not dangerous, and that I should merely avoid scratching or touching it, or occasionally damaging it, and should not cut it under no circumstances, because then it will become a GREAT problem. (But what it would be occasionally scratched in spy of all my efforts?). She even applied a peace of plaster to the lesion to protect it from any damage. Obviously, her warnings and the plaster contradict her claim that the lesion was not dangerous. If there are no risks: then why so many warnings, and why the plaster?


Dr. Wang"s plaster.


Dr. Wang also told that the lesion will probably fall down by itself, but did not say for sure.


This lesion before the injury, after the injury, and after regeneration.


On the opposite, the plaster did nothing good, because made skin to fold, causing pressure to the lesion. One of plaster's corners came off, detaching the corresponding peace of the lesion, and it began bleeding again. I had to remove the plaster; a cream (medication) was on its internal side. The plaster did the situation much worse, and now then it became even more dramatic. The lesion regenerated, in 2 weeks already looking even more terrible, started bleeding, and became a GREAT problem.


However, this problem became temporarily non-relevant, because almost 8 March 2020 (more precisely: 9-10 March, from Monday to Friday) I was seriously injured, and this accident might be a set up, and, by many strange coincident, it could be staged. But if I was not in such a worrisome state because of these new dermatological problems and the refusal of Dr. Wand to address them, my reaction could be very different, and I could avoid the accident. Because of the cruel and inhuman medics" treatment, I was in low spirits, and could not concentrate on the reality. I believe that if not the refusal to address my health problems, I would not be injured.


My back was also slightly injured, and the area of some sort of an infiltrate in the soft tissue under the skin along the spinal cord became swollen. When I came to CLSC Verdun with the injuries, I also complained about the infected cyst, but the doctor ignored badly placed plaster and its potentially damaging threat as well as the cyst"s infection problem.


23 May 2020, I sent an email to Dr. Wang:


[Date: Sat, 23 May 2020 17:38:03 -0400 [05:38:03 PM EDT]

From: leog@total.net

To: rendez-vous@careywang.com

Subject: Re: ----------


To: Dr. Beatrice Wang, dermatologist;

fax: (514) 788-3202, rendez-vous@careywang.com

From: Lev Gunin.


Dear Dr. Wang!

In the end of Jan. 2020, I had an appointment with a dermatologist for 4 main reasons:

1) growing convex nevus on the r. clavicle;

2) alleged angioma on the l. side of the face;

3) cyst on the middle of vertebrae;

4) painful & bleeding tag on the r. s. of my back.

I asked to remove them or to refer me to a specialist who can do it.

Instead of a response, I got a proposition to remove the tag for 100 CD, and was not

directed for an alternative medical help.

In 2 weeks the tag became horrifying, changing shape & color.

21 Feb. 2020, Dr. Rohan examined the tag, considering it dangerous, and arranged

a rendezvous with you, Dr. Wang, for its removal.

Wednesday, 26 Feb. 2020, I came to you (9:15) with the same 4 problems. Your

1-st reaction was a proposition to remove the tag for money, but when I explained that

I can not pay, the tag was announced "not dangerous" [however, your warnings that

I should avoid scratching or touching it, should not cut it under no circumstances, etc.:

contradict it].

You promised that the tag will "fall down by itself".

However, the tag never fell down, but began to regenerate into a potentially malicious

lesion. Another lesion began to grow on top of the a. m. quickly expanding nevus. Alleged

angioma has multiplied in 2 lesions. The cyst stopped to shrink in response to warm

compresses [the academic literature suggests an obligatory removal of ANY lesion on top

of the vertebrae (before it calcifies, becomes non-manageable, etc.)]. New uncommon lesions began to appear in different places.

By ignoring my fax from 27 Feb. 2020, you not just triggered further dermatological

complications, but provoked a deep psychological trauma, which led to irreversible damage.

Around midnight, 9-10 March, 2020, being preoccupied by the worries about the skin

lesions, I was not able to assess the weather conditions, and fell down icy stairs, getting a

fracture and other dangerous injuries. I believe: it happened due to my reaction to your

refusal to treat my skin pathologies and to respond to my fax message. This accident caused

a harsh blow to my health, and, in particular, wide skin pigmentation and innumerous red

nevus (erithremas).

You can say that within the under sourced public med. sys. people with visually terrible

skin harms and torments have a priority, but we all know that the "innocent-looking" lesions

may be life-threatening, and that many of poor beings are suffering from the worse skin

illnesses because were denied med. or social help [when needed] which could prevent the

most horrific outcomes.

I believe that your immediate duty is to repair the damage that you did to me by

urgently assessing and removing the problematic lesions. Otherwise, you have no moral right

to continue practicing your profession, which demands a compassionate approach (not obscured

by greed and money extortion).

Yours truly, Lev Gunin. Monday, Saturday, 23 May 2020.]


Dr. Wang never responded to this message.


My family doctor referred me to another dermatologist, Dr. Sonea, who (together with his secretary) appeared to be the most cynical and unethical doctor I ever dealt with, because (after studying the lesions) advised me to remove the lesions... myself.


11 May 2020, at 15:38, I sent a fax and an email to Dr. Viviott, begging for help. Right after sending this fax I received a call from the social housing manager (16:02) 514-868-4812, Marie. The connection is obvious. Social housing could leave more money for medical needs. It is just one more prove that all my calls, emails and faxes are monitored and sent to 1 place.


28 May 2020, the most dangerous lesion was removed by Dr. Viviott. She sent a sample for biopsy, and this alone tells a lot about this lesion. I do not believe that the lab would reveal the truth, because I suspect that any tests, which could expose medical crimes, are suppressed under the present totalitarian maximally centralized system.


1 June 2020 (Monday - 10:40) I had so-called phone appointment with Dr. Sonea, who repeated that the lesion on my back is not threatening and that the cyst can be left untouched.


The whole year, from May 2020 to May 2021, I was struggling with the health problems, while deprived of any health care. With an advanced and advancing glaucoma, I was abandoned by the ophthalmologist, who did not refer me to another glaucoma specialist, and now (when I right this) I am 1,5 years (18 months) without an ophthalmological care, and blindness possibly approached very fast. After the tremendous urological drama, 2 surgeries and several invasive procedures, I was left without any urologist while the surgeries were not completely successful. This list is very long.


3 April 2020, I had a phone appointment with my family doctor. I complained about having no access to a specialist ophthalmologist (while I have an advance and advancing glaucoma) for 1,5 years and to specialist urologist (after a tremendous urological drama, 2 surgeries, a lot of invasive procedures, and so on) for 5 (!) years, and about my unsolved dermatological problems. He said "I"ll see what we can do". However, in July 2021, the situation is still the same.


The public health care in Quebec was artificially destroyed for a number of years, and the authorities and medics got a very convenient for them excuse: COVID! And, besides, the health care system was over oriented to the punishment of marginalized people, dissidents, or conscious objectors, instead of providing a sufficient medical care.


1 March 2021, something has pricked me in the scapula, when I was by my older daughter. There was a tiny oval trace (very painful). It remained a mystery. Next day, a visible inflammation started in the same area, and the frequently inflamed cyst became also more inflamed and painful.


In spite of my family doctor"s inaction in finding specialists-doctors for my alarming needs (or his inability to do it), he remained my last hope. 9 March 2021 (8:45) I had an appointment with him via phone call. He issued a requisite for blood-urine test. However, it turned up that my access to laboratory tests is artificially blocked. I called 5 hospitals for booking an appointment (since the beginning of "Covid" campaign, people can not come without an appointment). Normally, when you call, they must give you an appointment. Everyone, whom I know, called and received the date of the appointment right away. However, when I called, they were telling me that will put me on a "waiting list", and then will call back with the date of the appointment. Nobody called, never. When I contacted the new Royal Victoria Hospital, they told me on the phone that they do not have my name "among the patients". Before I could ask what does it means, I was disconnected.


Then I decided to go for the blood test to CLSC. Among the CLSCs in my area (CLSC St.-Henry, CLSC Verdun, etc.), I have chosen the CLSC PSC as a place with the most human and compassionate team of medical workers. This CLSC has 2 branches: at rue Ash, and at rue Centre. I received an appointment for the branch at rue Centre, having forgotten that there was an "angry" man who once already provoked a stressful situation for me.


I contacted the CLSC in the beginning of April, but was given an appointment for the beginning of May, which looked suspicious: why I had to wait so long for a simple blood test? Other people, with whom I spoke at PSC, waited much less. It is possible that this alone was a sign of persecution.


10 May 2021 (10:00) I went to this CLSC at rue Centre for the blood-urine-test. Expecting something non-expectable, I was prepared to deal with a possible provocation, but the provocation that was awaiting me there left me no chances to have a test done.


Wearing a blue approved mask, I came exactly at 9:55, as was told on the phone (5 minutes in advance), and disinfected my hands near the entrance. However, seeing that I already did it, the nurse demanded the hands cleaning ritual, which was already an insult. I did not argue, just complied.


She ordered me to sit down on a designated chair, and brought another (same as mine) mask, ordering me to replace my mask by that one. Her mask was not in a box, not even in a plastic cover. She was holding a jammed mask without any cover; obviously not sterile.


I replied that I have no confidence in her mask - and do not want to be infected by it. But she insisted, threatening to block me from entering the blood test room.


I responded that, if so, I am leaving, and demanded my requisition back. This women was about to change her mind, but consulted her chef, a low white person, who limped a little. I immediately recognized him. Several years ago, once he already manifested an inhuman behavior.


He was insisting that I absolutely must change the mask, and even raised his voice, speaking with me in such a bureaucratic style as if I was not a human being.


I told that, after putting the brand-new mask on, I came directly from home, from door to door, without any contacts at home or in the street, and without removing or lowering the mask, and, thus, the mask, which I am wearing, cannot be contaminated: no way.


However, he was he was unshakable.


I said that I am leaving, and demanded the requisition back.


He did not return the paper, but disappeared in a back door near the entrance. (On the right from the entrance).


The nurse did not allow me to continue sitting, and expelled me to the space near the entrance, and this looked like a punishment.


I have no idea how long I waited, but, obviously, more than 5 or 10 minutes.


Then the man has appeared again from the back door, returning the paper and sending me away.


Thus, I was denied a test, which absence (regarding my health issues) could lead to any unpredictable consequences.


It has to be stressed that they did not demand to change the mask from the person, who came after me; at least, not in my presence. When my wife has passed a blood test in the same CLSC at rue Centre, she also entered to the procedure in her own mask.


I believe that it could be an act of a pre-planned sabotage.


Putting me in such a stressful situation, they could trigger very serious consequences. On my way home, I had a tachycardia and heart pain, and could experience a heart attack or a stroke.


It is possible that I was exposed to humiliation of not 2, but 3 bureaucrats and formalists, because I suspect that the man from the CLSC disappeared in the back door for contacting someone by his mobile phone, asking what to do with me.


I do not believe in any scientific base for the policy to change the masks when entering the medical institutions. On the contrary, I am sure that this policy helped the virus to spread. At the different stages of the pandemic, the medical institutions were becoming major spots of the Covid bubble, and the policy of wearing a hospital-provided mask could contribute to the pandemic. It is very possible that not the sanitary considerations, but a desire to expose people to the surveillance cameras was behind this policy, and the paranoiac obsession of surveillance is putting people at risk.


For years, my lab tests completely disappeared, or was incomplete, or were missing pages, and so on, and now my access to the tests was blocked at all. My complaints to ombudsmen were cynically rejected in their replies, and a bizarre provocation was organized at Montreal General Hospital in response to my complains.


But by blocking me an access to lab tests, medical bureaucrats simultaneously blocked me an access to my family doctor, because an appointment with him had no sense without the lab tests.


Meanwhile, the situation with the infected cyst has become alarming...


17 Jun. 2021 (10:20) another (or, maybe, the same) medical bureaucrat from CLSC Pointe St.-Charles contacted me via phone (at was an anonymous call). He wanted to discuss the refusal of the blood test on 10 May 2021.


The caller insisted that the policy of changing the mask in the medical institutions and accepting the masks provided by them is scientifically-based practice and necessary to prevent the Covid spread, but could not prove it.


When he said that, allegedly, this is required because the patients can wear reutilized masks, I argued that nobody cancelled the presumption of innocence yet, and that the medics can just ask patients about it.


I said that, in my opinion, there is no scientific basis under this policy, which, on the opposite, contributed to the spread of the virus.


There are no more contagious (contaminated) sites during an epidemic or pandemic than the hospitals, and the risks to be infected through hospital-provided masks are much higher then other possibilities. The main (hidden) reason of the mask changing policy, I added, is to flash patients" faces for the surveillance cameras.


I also stressed that the mask, provided to me by the nurse on 10 May 2021, was not in a box, not in a plastic cover, but without anything, and looked not new and not "propre".


However, in response, the caller has twisted my words, claiming that "this is not true, we never provide dirty masks", while I did not pronounce the word "dirty" (sale). Such illegal, deceptive methods indicate the degree of his unethical ideology.


I emphasized that on the 10-th of May I was wearing exactly the same type of mask as the one that was offered to me at CLSC at rue Centre, and said (after sterilizing my hands) to the nurse and her chef that I put on a brand new mask at home, and came straight here, from door to door, meeting no one on my way and not touching the mask.


He stressed then that - if I would go to a hospital - I would be forced to change the mask: the same as in CLSC.


In response, I said that I visited hospitals 3 or 4 times (in reality: dozens of times) during the worse periods of the pandemics, and was never forced to change the mask (which indicates that many compassionate, empathically relevant people still work in the medical system).


Whatever the regulations are - I stressed - you must remain human.


Even the CLSC nurse, who forced me to accept her mask, which was not in its original cover (and, therefore, not sterile) and looked crumpted, was ready to change her mind, but her chef intervened - and blocked my way.


I stated that the refusal of the blood test maybe already caused a significant damage to my health, and now (almost a month and a half since the incident) it became an urgency.


I said, OK, if I'll agree to change the mask, but only for my own one from the original untouched box and in its original plastic cover, and I would change it before your eyes, will you give me the appointment?


He said "no" with a palpable anger, and disconnected.


Evidently, this person has committed an offensive act, deliberately destroying other person"s health for unreasonable, ridiculous, ideological, and formalistic motives.


Meanwhile, the abscess became really dangerous, almost life-threatening, and causing unbearable pain, damage to the back skin and soft tissue, and was progressing very quickly in spite of all my measures and procedures (like warm compresses, Polysporin applications, etc.).


Besides the abscess, I had an injured ceratosis lesion, which situated in such an area that was constantly irritated by what I am wearing. It also required an urgent medical attention.


I sent an email, and then called Dr. Sonea, stressing the urgency and expecting a course of antibiotics and a referral to a specialist, but his secretary responded with the lashed on me anger and declared in rage that I must obtain my family doctor"s referral to "every lesion separately". This was an insult and an act of pure cruelty.


Then I contacted practically all clinics in Montreal, such as Clinique Médicale du Sud-Ouest (GMF)-4475, rue Bannantyne; Clinique Médicale Montréal Est (GMF)-11370; rue Notre-Dame Est; Clinique Familiale 55 rue Eglise; CLSC Verdun (GMF), etc., and everywhere they told that do not accept any new patients or patients sans-rendez-vous.


This explains why the Emergency Rooms are overcrowded in the present time to such a degree that some of them are closed (first and unprecedented event in Quebec"s history). The System of Soviet-style bureaucrats has created a humanitarian crisis, expanding the amplitude of the tremendous human tragedy.


Any abscess is very painful, but it is hard to imagine the level of pain from an abscess, which was formed at exactly same spot where a number of other abscesses already were popping during 15 years, and where scar tissue from wide incisions left. (Not mentioning that an abscess on top of a cyst is a different thing). Tylenol and Celebrex could not decrease such a wild pain.


Having not succeeded in obtaining a rendez-vous at any of Montreal"s clinics, I called my family doctor, but left the country and did not work during his summer holidays.


Probably, the last clinic in Montreal, which still accepted patients sans-redez-vous, was CLSC PSC, and I managed (it also was not that simple!) to get an appointment on 28 June 2021. Before seeing me, the doctor (Dr. Rosalie Mongeau-Petitpas) spoke with me on the phone, and I described the whole history of this problem since 1985 (when I was stubbed in the back), then since 2006 (when the cyst has formed on top of the wound, and, since then, I am denied the cyst"s removal), then since 2014 (when I had a major abscess and a surgery), and I repeated 3 times that major suffering, complications, and the extended ordeal of the infected cyst (which provoked the surgery) happened because I was denied antibiotics. It was clear that I mean the oral antibiotics, and that I am demanding the antibiotics. Before Dr. Mongeau-Petitpas, the nurse called me, and I told her that I demand a course of antibiotics. I have no doubt that Dr. Mongeau-Petitpas was aware of my desire to receive a course of antibiotics.


During the rendez-vous and on the phone I told Dr. Mongeau-Petitpas that I am using the antibiotic (antibacterial) cream, but it does not help at all.


So, Dr. Mongeau-Petitpas was aware that I already had many abscesses at the same spot, that the abscesses are constantly appear because of the infected cyst, and that I want a course of antibiotics. She was also aware that the clay (pus) infiltrate is moving along the spinal cord, filling out the under skin layers along the spinal cord and in all directions. She was also aware that the applications of antibiotic (antibacterial) creams are useless (that"s what I said).


In spite of all this, she said that she does not see a "serious infection" and did not prescribe the course of oral antibiotics. She administrated the antibiotic oilmen, but, unfortunately, I did not understand that the antibiotic that she mentioned is not an oral antibiotic, but a cream, and, therefore, did not dispute such a prescription.


Here (below) is how the abscess looked on 28 June 2021. Its (and skin"s around) redness, convexity, and potential danger was obvious (see below):


This is how it looked on 28 June 2021, and on next day, in the morning, 29 June 2021 (a wider area).


Dr. Mongeau-Petitpas prescribed Taro-Muporacin, and directed me for an ultrasound.


(See the picture of Taro-Muporacin below)


Confidential information removed for security reasons.


The ultrasound requisition.


Dr. Mongeau-Petitpas may be a good person, and she looked and sound patient and nice, and did not treat us (my wife was accompanying me) improperly in no way, but almost no one can resist stereotypes and System bios, stigmatizing someone like me. By complaining about the medical crimes, which victim I found myself (systematic refusal of the cyst"s removal and of the proper treatment of the abscesses formed on top of this infected cyst), I became stigmatized and could fit the stereotypes" prejudges by definition. This is why I have a reason to suggest that Dr. Mongeau-Petitpas prescribed Taro-Mupirocin and sent me for an ultrasound not because she believed that this cream would prevent the spread of the infection and would heal the abscess, and that the ultrasound can solve any problem, but because she just contested my claim about the cyst and tried to justify her unwillingness to prescribe a course of oral antibiotics.


Next day, 29 June 2021, when Dr. Mongeau-Petitpas was working at CLSC, I called there several times asking for a course of antibiotics, to speak to Dr. Mongeau-Petitpas, and complaining about the major worsening, unbearable pain, and infection spread all over my back.


However, Dr. Mongeau-Petitpas did not call back, and ignored my complains.


Meanwhile, in the evening on 29 June 2021, the situation has become very dramatic. The infection has spread all over my back, the pain became even more unbearable, and the whole skin on my back was burning and hot on palpation. Same day, I already got a fever, but did not want to report it to the doctors, because they would subject me to Covid tests and (who knows?) could force me to accept vaccination (which I do not want to do).


The picture below shows the whole seriousness of the situation and it shows how wide was the affected area.


The state of the abscess on 29 June 2021.


Next day, 30 June 2021, my wife and me: we contacted CLSC again, demanding antibiotics, and I received a call from another doctor. She had a very different approach, judging not by how I speak or describe the events, but by what exactly the meaning of my words. She did not doubt about my assessment of the cyst and did not show that I am, allegedly, "exaggerating".


She prescribed a course of antibiotics and told me to stop Taro-Mupirocin.


7 days later, when the pain and me general suffering have eased a bit, I went online, and read on one forum that Taro-Mupirocin is one of the most dangerous medications and, allegedly, contraindicated for abscess treatment.


Indeed, as I stopped Taro-Mupirocin, the skin was not burning as before, and the abscess began to heal. Evidently, a big part of the worsening was provoked by Taro-Mupirocin.


Next photos reflect the worsening just on 1 single day, in 30 June 2021 (the 1-st, left, was taken in the morning, the 2-nd in the evening, same day):


Thus torture and damage could be prevented if Dr. Mongeau-Petitpas

would prescribe oral antibiotics on 28 June 2021, or, at least, next day,

in response to my complains.


In spite of the prescription, I did not receive the antibiotics right away. I forgot to tell the second doctor that I had issues with Septra and Protrin. For this reason, the delivery of antibiotics was delayed, and, finally, I received Tetracycline.


I don"t know, whose choice it was, but Tetracycline, in some ways, is not a very sufficient antibiotic, and, in some countries, prescribed mostly for children and kids.


Possibly, for this reason, the infection was still progressing during 5 days of the antibiotic course, and only in the end of the 5-th day an improvement occurred. Next photo (30 June 2021) shows that worsening and illustrate the level of suffering:


The situation on 30 June 2021.


______________


Lev Gunin


THE PUNITIVE HEALTH CARE

[HEALTH CARE AS A REPRESSIVE TOOL]


BOOK 4-3


THE MISTREATMENT OF MY INJURIES. PART 3. [Mar. - Dec. 2020]


BOOK 4 - PART 3.


THE CONTENT.


CHAPTER 1

CHAPTER 2

CHAPTER 3

CHAPTER 4

CHAPTER 5

CHAPTER 6


* * *


The whole text of the chronological events and medical documents (under the name of "The Punitive Health Care - (Health Care as a Repressive Tool)" is available for examination only on the basis of the following contract between the author and the reader:


I (THE READER) GIVE MY CONSENT THAT, BY CLICKING CORRESPONDING LINKS AND ACCESSING THE TEXT OF "THE PUNITIVE HEALTH CARE", I AUTOMATICALLY AGREE TO THE FOLLOWING PRELIMINARY CONDITIONS [FOR READING]:


-- I am (at least) 18 years old.


1. I (the reader) is undertaking (commit myself) not to distribute the text of "The Punitive Health Care - (Health Care as a Repressive Tool)" - entirely, or in fragments; not to copy medical documents; and not to share the text and images without author' permission.


2. I (the reader) understand that the confidential information, which is contained in this text, cannot be used for any other [than the reading (extraneous; secondary)] purposes and needs, for any researches, essays, stories, etc.


3. I (the reader) commit myself not to sneer at open ticklish personal information (which sharing was induced by circumstances), not to savor any medical, physiological, or anatomic details, and not to use this text as a reason for mockery and persecution.


4. I (the reader) am warned by the author that, except for a number of obviously immoral (by definition) doctors' and medical staff's actions, other decisions and acts described in this "confession" are not subjected to hasty moral assessment because a) only experts can judge finally about their justification and fairness; b) explanations and vindications of other party are necessary. We also do not know to what degree the doctors were under an influence and direct power of police, Ministry of Immigration, and other enforcement agencies, political organizations, groups and persons - with their own ideological, economic, and propaganda interests, - and to what degree this influence impacted on their diagnostic conclusions and assessments of patient's state of health. Many of the documentary confirmed facts incontestably demonstrate that author's ideological stand (who's opposing to younger generation's transformation into zombie-biorobots with mobile phones on shoulders instead of heads; to electronic totalitarianism with its prison-like total video surveillance; and to the tyrannical political censorship) played nearly a major role in enraging the authorities and triggering the persecutions.


5. I (the reader) am warned that the author sees the main cause of the most dramatic (for him) events in the fact that the enforcement agencies and interested persons and groups managed to present him to the medical community as an individual incapable to evaluate his health condition objectively; as a health-consciousan (or hypochondriac); an extremist; a troublemaker; an individual obsessed with panic and alarm patterns; as a person, who is making unreal demands to the system of medical care - concerning his - allegedly - pseudo-maladies and exaggerated gravity of trivial indispositions. This smear campaign of defamation, scurrilous libel, and wicked calumny made impossible receiving an adequate medical care (and sometimes any medical help at all), and led to health undermining, numerous diseases, incidents, and unnecessary sufferings. Doctors also considered difficult to believe in continuous (not connected with each other) illnesses, with an interval of 4-7 days, sometimes rolling at the same time: as tsunami. They refused to believe in these sequences of illnesses' painful course, danger, and significance. This chronicle disproves such a prejudiced opinion, producing an incontestable evidence.


6. I (the reader) am informed that all negative remarks, characteristics, and facts' assessments belong only to the portrayal of criminal groups, extremists, and carriers of anti-humanistic, racist, and totalitarian ideology, but do not contain groundless generalizations and negative assessment of any country, ethnic group, or religion. The author is categorically against dismantling of any of the existing states, and against restrictions of the rights of religious congregations of any faith.


7. I (the reader) am informed that this edition partially presents the previous 2017 edition without any changes, and, thus, may not correspond to later view and opinions.


8. I (the English reader) am informed that some parts of the following English text of "The Punitive Health Care" - were translated from Polish, Russian, or French originals, and may contain primitive language, double interpretation, or puzzled meaning. Such confusing fragments should be compared with their originals in Polish and Russian languages (author's native languages) [2016-2017]; all controversial points must be resolved through such a comparison.


9. In the very last moment of this edition's make-up (April 2023), the author came across a description of so-called Havana-syndrome, and found same symptoms and complications, which he experienced when was attacked by an unknown remote weapon (3 Nov. 2005, 7 Jan. 2013, and 21 June 2016), and developed symptoms of post-microwave irradiation.


_________


CHAPTER 1.


MARCH 9-10, 2020. A FALL.


Before describing the accident, I would like to provide a quotation of an upper paragraph [Book 3; The Mistreatment of My Injuries. Part 1. Chapter 1.], written years before 2020:


"Why most of the "accidental" accidents happened when I confessed to someone (in my emails, or in telephone conversations) that I restored my health, and that I am in an excellent psychological and physical form? Why most of the "accidental" accidents happened when I was at the peak of my creative activity, publishing (on my web sites, or through the Google Books, or other e-publishers) a record quantity of my creative works?"


This perfectly correspond to the circumstances surrounding the fall at 9-10 March, 2020 night.


First, during my telephone conversation with Yuri Belanski, a former well-known film director, and my close friend, I mentioned that I am in a very good physical form at the given moment. (He also knew it while walking with me several times in December and January). I also said to Yuri that there is no ice or snow left in my neighborhood, so good "they remove the snow from the streets".


Second, I wrote in an email to my former teacher, Irina Morikh - a famous poet and musical pedagogue and theoretician, an author of study-books:


;

;

. 3/5/2020, 00:26,

What is possible still to do?

;

The diet helps some. It helped me

to get rid of the bad cholesterol, and

also helped to develop the "good"

cholesterol, balanced the triglycerides,

brought down sugar to the middle of

the norm, etc.

;


(...)


Now, before describing, what happened, I want to list the circumstances (or their combinations) that never occurred before, and played a fatal role in that tragic event.


1) From October to March, 2020, I never: a) missed the weather prognosis on the radio; b) put on sneakers, not the boots; c) was not in a thick, but in a thin jacket (coat); d) started to go down the stairs without holding the handrails; e) took 2 bags, in the right and in the left hand, instead of 1 as usually; f) went out without glows, as happened around midnight, 9-10 March, 2020; etc. (other 10 counts).

2) Sometimes I carry out the garbage bags on Tuesday morning, but - happens - that I take them out to the gate late evening Monday, and on Tuesday at 6-7 a.m. I move them from the gate to the street. In that (2-nd) case (at night), my neighbor is always sitting on the balcony, or goes out when he hears me going out. And, if it is slippery, he warns me. This time, around midnight, it was an exclusion, and he was not there.

3) For 14 years - since we moved to this apartment - it never happened that the balcony"s surface had no traces or signs of ice and snow while the stairs were covered by a thick layer of ice. Seeing no ice (and no danger) on the balcony, I thought that I"ll be completely safe on the stairs.

4) Earlier, at 17:00 or 18:00, I heard like someone speaks outside the kitchen window, and glanced from the balcony door. Seeing no one, I went out, and descended 2 flights of stairs down, but still did not see anyone. The stairs were not slippery, there was no ice there, which later (around midnight) provoked a feeling of security.

5) It was me who (days before) took the 1-st 2 garbage bags outside to the balcony"s barrel. And I remembered very good that I put an almost empty bag to the very bottom the barrel, but, when I opened it, the half empty bag was on the top. My wife said she did not pull out the bag from the bottom to the top. Then: who did it?

6) All people in my environment knew that I am very stressed because the dermatologist, Dr. Wang, has refused to remove a dangerous lesion from my back for free (as she was obliged due to medical indication), demanding money. When I went to the balcony for the garbage, I was just thinking about that; I was preoccupied by this health problem to such a degree that this affected my normal ingenuity and reactions. As I already wrote in the end of Book 2, my mother died because (indirectly) of the same lesion in the same place of her back, and this also played a huge psychological role.

7) When my wife went to the balcony after me (after my fall), and went down the stairs, she saw that 2 upper flights of stairs were covered by a thin layer of ice, while 2 lower ones were absolutely free of ice. That never happened before.


An evil fatality of the sequence of events is also stressed by the fact that my wife said that she"s going to take out the garbage bags directly to the street (without leaving them till the morning at the gate) tomorrow, and I hesitated few minutes, and, finally, did not stay home.

Going back to the point 1) we can suggest that I missed the radio weather forecast because from 17:00 to 19:00 every hour a car was honking outside or a motorcycle roared so loudly that I looked out every time, forgetting about the radio. I put on the sneakers because I have no money to buy new boots, and my both pairs of my old ones became problematic. Besides, I asked my wife, if I have to put on the boots, and what"s the weather, but she - with negligence and indifference - said that I can put on what I want, without telling that - when she was outside - it was a short rain or icy rain. And, again, I don"t blame her, because now she"s having some psychological problems, but she"s a wonderful and caring women, and for many years she was my reliable back.


The timing of this accident is also very significant. It happened just days after my submission of few letters to some of the foreign newspapers. In my letters I said that in summer, 2019, I complained to the police of Montreal about the police surveillance, more then 100 times of police"s interceptions, interrogations, escorts, searches, etc., from 2006 to 2015, and that, after a visit of 2 police officers, I heard nothing else from the police. My demands to receive a written response were ignored. I sent emails and faxes to almost all newspapers and other media in Canada (including CBC radio), to all human rights and civil rights organizations, and received NOT A SINGLE RESPONSE. This unimaginable situation, which surpluses any most brave conspiracy theory, has forced me to consider legal venues and foreign newspapers. And then immediately occurred this accident. [Copies of my letters to police and newspapers are added as the attachment to this part of the book.]


It is also significant that it happened at the beginning of the pandemics, because some of the activists were targeted before 9 September, 2001 (9-11-2001), terrorists acts; before the Wall-Street Occupation movement; or before the putsch in Kiev. As I wrote (presenting real medical and other documents as well) in the 1-st book of this series of my records, in 1999-2000 Immigration officials have forged a falsified diagnosis "tuberculosis", a fake blood test for the venereal diseases, and threatened me by a urological infection (which indeed manifested on the 1-st of January, 2001. On September, 8, 2001 (Saturday), I miraculously avoided a deadly accident, which happened just 1 day before 9-11. I had an accident at the time of the evolving putsch in Kiev (which was shadowed by an ethnic conflict, and I was never intended to take parts in the ethnic conflicts, and never criticized nor the Kiev, nor the Putin"s regimes in their confrontation politics). I know that some of the activists in different countries were targeted by terrorists acts or by the "accidents" from January to March, 2020, depending of the country and the time of the epidemics outbreak in each particular state. In Quebec, the epidemics was starting in the beginning of March, and immediately, I had this accident which could kill me.


And, finally, we all know that human behavior is extremely predictable, and the social networks giants with their software-robots, and the special services: they all collect the behavioral patterns, which allow to control human acts. When I first directed myself to the stairs with only 1 bag, something could distract my attention and intention, changing my plan. It is known that a person can react to this by doing that, and to that by doing this. It is like pushing the piano keys. You push the key number 3, and you know that this is note "do" (C); or you push the key number 7, and you know that this is note "sol" (G).


My neighbors" absence at the balcony could be not occasionally, and could relate, for example, to Corona-virus epidemic, or to something else.


It is possible that someone removed water and ice from my balcony, in term to provoke an illusion of security, and to entice me to the icy stair trap. And, definitely, someone pulled the half-empty bag from the bottom to the top of the barrel, because if it was at the very bottom, I would take only 1 heavier bag 1-st, and would hold the handrails, and would prevent my fall, and would reconsider carrying garbage down, or would put on the boots, or would take out the bags through the internal stairs.


It is also possible that someone splashed water to the metal stairs: because the icy layer was too big for a short rain or icy rain.


The conversation with my friend, Yuri Belanski, could be a key, because in the past information about me surfaced in our dialogues was used against me. If someone, who planned a setup, knew that I don"t expect any ice outside, and would not be careful, and knew when I am taking the bags outside: it could make a planned terrorist act much easier.


And, finally, the accident happened anyway because of Dr. Beatrice Wang, whose cruelty and greed provoked it by placing me in an extremely stressful situation.


So, I went out to the balcony, took out 1 full bag, and approached the stairs for descending. However, I returned to the barrel, and took also the half-empty bag as well. I hesitated a bit, because it was insecure to go down with a bag in each hand, and without support myself by holding the handrail. However, I did not actually THINK about it (because my thought were occupied by the worries about the back lesion and Dr. Wang"s refusal to remove it without payments, but, rather, hesitated on the instincts" level. Probably, this is why I did not find a solution, it was a simplest task just to take 2 bags in one hand, and to use another hand for holding the handrails.


I made only 1 or 2 steps: and fell down, sliding to the very end of this stairs" section. The acceleration and the blow were monstrous, because I slide off by the heel, which makes the strength of the blow several times higher. If I struck my back few cm above the waist, I could die of the fatal kidney damage.


If I was wearing the glows, I may avoid the fracture and injuries of 3 or 4 fingers. If I was wearing the thick coat, I may not have such a devastating buttock injury. If I went out in winter boots, I may not fall, or the fall could be not so destructive. It not the conduct of Dr. Wang, whose behavior and actions influenced my ability to assess the weather conditions, and to think and act normally, I would notice the danger, and would avoid the accident anyway. Improbable bad luck. Unimaginably unhappy combination of circumstances. Non-linear physics? Or Black Magic? Or inversion of all previous patterns?


CHAPTER 2.


The injuries were quite severe: right hand"s fracture; right buttock"s giant hematoma (in 1 hour after the accident) with huge swelling; bruise of the coxofemoral higher bones; trauma of the spinal column.


Right hand"s damage (cartilage, cuts, & fracture) did not allow to apply ice to the buttock; ice was applied only to the hand. My wife did not rash to apply ice; I had intentions to go to an Emergency immediately, but she insisted that we should wait till the morning, because did not believe in the gravity of my injuries, and went to sleep.


[I told her right away that I have a hand fracture at the middle of metacarpia-5, a dangerous buttock injury, 3 or 4 serious fingers" injuries, and so on.]


In the past years, I told her innumerous times that one day I"ll kill myself, because the stairs are very dangerous and built in violation of the standards, and I did several attempts to carry out the garbage bags through the apartment to the internal stairs, but she used to scream at me, and made my transit to the indoor stairs impossible. However, I don"t blame her, because years of repressions against me have poisoned life of all members of my family, and (as I think) my wife is suffering from the post-traumatic stress disorder.


In the morning, I was not sure, what hospital to choose: Montreal General, or Verdun hospital. At once, I told my wife to drive me to Verdun hospital, but then said that it will be better to go to MGH, because it has the best traumatology in Montreal, but she ignored my wish. I think that probably it was better that we went to Verdun. This underfinanced institution has less resources then other hospitals, and other problems, and not many patients go there, so, the waiting time there is 20-30 times shorter then in MGH. On the other hand, good people work in this hospital, and I always met a compassionate attitude there, while in the English McGill hospitals I had a very bad reception.


We"ve been at Verdun hospital at 9:00 (Tuesday morning, 10 April 2020), and I saw only 3 patients in the waiting room. I was called to the triage probably at 9:50.


I was examined by doctor (Dr. Joyal, Marie-Suzanne?), at 10:30, and 2-nd time - around 12:40. I suggested to the doctor a fracture in the middle of r. hand"s os metacarpia-5, deep cuts between the proximal phalanx & middle phalanx of all 4 fingers, with a profound damage to the cartilage, a possible damage to the sacroiliac joint, to spinal column, and a serious damage to veins & soft tissue of the r. buttock.


An X-Ray confirmed r. hand"s fracture right where I suggested. A damage to coxofemoral bones wasn"t confirmed. Spinal X-Ray was not performed.


I don"t know, what was the reason not to order the spinal X-Ray and ultrasound of the right buttock, but I suggest that at the given moment it was not realistic. The hematoma was too fresh, so, it was better to wait 2-3 days or a week, and the spinal X-Ray was, probably, not a necessity, at least, right now, because there were no indication of a grave crack or a fracture there. (Probably, dislocation may be not ruled out, but I am not a judge in this matter).


So, the conclusion is that this doctor did everything correctly and professionally, and with a manifested compassion. She also ordered a blood test to see if there no low thrombocytes or other blood components that could aggravate the hematoma bleeding. [However, the blood formula was abnormal, with high leucocytes (12,2) and neutrophils (9,8), and low hemoglobin and plaquettes] She was not worried about the 5-th metacarpia hand"s fracture - because it was the most simple fracture with no displacement, and said that everything must be OK (I told her that I am a pianist). (I responded that I HOPE SO (because I know the modern public health system, and what harm it capable to do). She worried more about the buttock"s injury. She could not know that in the orthopedic clinic of the hospital they will make this fracture even more worse then it was in the beginning. And, finally, she gave me a referral to CLSC in 1-2 weeks (a follow up).


In the emergency, they put a temporary orthopedic support, and said that the plaster may be laid today or tomorrow.


This francophone doctor and 3 francophone nurses did everything that was possible to do in this hospital and in this situation of Covid-19 Epidemic. And, besides, they were very nice in everything, including ice delivery and keeping me in a room, where I could lay down (because I could not sit or stand (more then 10-15 min). They also offered me Tylenol, but I refused, which regretted later.


In contrast, they kept me (in my condition) 5 or 6 hours waiting at the corridor, where I could not apply ice, and all waiting time became a torture without Tylenol, and without drinking and eating. Was it a personal guilt of someone or of few individuals, or the whole system? But it was a barbaric treatment. They could prevision such a long waiting time, and to send me home (5 minutes away by car) for at least 3-4 hours, and if they could not, it means that the system of public health care is completely broken.


Some people came with an appointment, and they were called into rooms without long waiting hours. Some people came from the Emergency Room, and they also were called relatively soon (within 1-1,5 hours), while I was kept on the corridor till 18:00 or 18:30. I was called in shortly before the closure of the clinic.


Consequently, I could not apply ice to the buttock in time (which made this problem much worse then if I was keeping ice treatment for all this time); and to my fingers. I believe that by forcing me to stand and to sit on the corridor for many hours, the medical workers have provoked much more serious giant hematoma"s complications then if I was laying on the left side and walking at home. And, besides, my wife, who was waiting with me there, suffered also, having lot of her own health problems and anxiety.


When I finally was assessed by an orthopedic surgeon, Dr. Marie Gdalevitch (Gdalewicz?) did not even look at my hand, but only stared at the computer screen with the X-Ray"s images. I don"t think that she"s treating her commercial patients this way. She told that plaster must solve all the problems. However, looking at the screen, I said that, according to what I see, this fracture is not that simple, and has a sharp edge at the bottom of the radial splinter, and this may cause a problem. And I said that I am a pianist, and if I"ll not be able to play piano again, it will make my life even more tragic and miserable. She responded that, if I want a surgery, it can be done, but warned me that the re-adaptation after a surgery takes much longer, and the rapidity of fingers" movement may be lost forever, while after the plaster it will be much easier, and the rapidity of movements will be restored faster.


I deciphered that this way: because I don"t have a private insurance, nobody will provide me an adequate re-adaptation course, and that"s why FOR ME it is better to be limited by plaster.


When I said that the fingers are also injured seriously, and must be treated, she responded that a physiotherapy can fully restore all functions, but this is now commercial. I asked if the plaster will be put for 4 weeks, and she said that for 5 weeks.


Dr. Gdalevitch was holding my chart form ER in her hands, and it was mentioned about the giant buttock"s hematoma in the chart, but she said no word about it. To my knowledge, the orthopedic surgeons are trained for the soft tissue and muscles traumas as well, and, if so, it was her duty to treat the hematoma, too. But, when I wanted to ask about it, Dr. Gdalevitch suddenly stood up and disappeared, and I was "HANDED OVER" to the nurse.


The nurse, who did the plaster work, was a young girl, and looked like she did not have much experience. She became very angry that I can not sit on the whole (hard) procedural stool, and continued to be angry even when I explained that I have a terrible injury of the right buttock. I said then that it is like an open wound, and asked her to tell the doctor to assess this injury, too. I also asked her if she can bring a pillow to put on the seat, but she ignored my request. When I was telling the nurse about the buttock"s injury, Dr. Gdalevitch came into the room for something, and heard my words and my request to tell the doctor about the buttock injury, but just ignored it. She did not care, how I am going to survive at home having the plaster on my right hand while not been able to lay on my right side. She gave no instructions, no recommendations, no immediate (not delayed) referral to CLSC for this.


When the nurse was applying the plaster, she pressed on my hand and arm with such a heavy force (and with the whole weight of her body) that my hand was shaking, and this wasn"t normal. I kept my hand in the naturally bend position, but she "corrected" it several times, making 2 opposite sides of my palm to bend inside and to each other. I expressed my doubt, questioning if it is a correct way to lay the plaster, but she became almost furious.


Later, thinking about what she did to my hand and arm, I came to a conclusion that, if an inappropriate plaster"s application to the arm or even to the hand could happen occasionally (theoretically, regardless of the actual situation), the excessive pressure on 2 fingers (4 and 5) - attached together - can not be explained. How could she make the plaster too tight even for the fingers? The little finger and its neighbor were squeezed by the plaster as much as the whole hand and arm, and this was something completely impossible. An inappropriate plaster at all the levels (2 attached fingers; hand; wrist; and arm) could be put in such a way only intentionally, was my verdict.


As a result, I was sent home without follow ups (they only gave me an appointment to remove the plaster on April, 14, 2020 (Tuesday), without the assessment of the giant hematoma, and without any verbal instructions concerning the plaster and my situation.


3-4 hours later I understood that something is wrong with the plaster. I kept my hand up all the time, but the fingers became very red and extremely swollen despite this and all my attempts to move the fingers and the elbow. The cast has rendered an enormous pressure to all bones, and was too tight, putting my hand and arm at risk (potential damage to the vascular & lymphatic system), squeezing tissue and bones, blocking normal blood circulation. Next days I felt like the plaster is going to crash the wrist bones, and the fingers became always cold and almost not sensitive.


I told my wife and my family members that the plaster must be replaced, but they were in panic about the Covid-19 epidemic, and refused to listen. Only my older daughter supported my intention to replace the plaster, and trusted my judgment of the situation. The state officials, the police, the medical institutions, and some of the doctors did many efforts to convince my close ones that my personal judgment (and opinion) is not adequate, and, after 26 years this started to give some terrible results.


I called Verdun orthopedic clinic: to inquire about the plaster replacement. The secretary was very nice, and transferred my call to the nurse. She started to speak with me, and then abruptly stopped, and told me to wait. After several minutes, another woman came to speak with me, and, after my explanation, told me to show up at the emergency. I said that I did not put myself the plaster on, so, why must I risk my life sitting at the emergency at the peak of the epidemic outbreak, instead of getting an appointment in the clinic for plaster"s removal, but received no answer.


The plaster edges were so sharp that they could cut my fingers, and several time I cut my left hand"s fingers over them. The pain was so intensive that the Tylenol did not work, and, to reduce pain and to fight inflammation, I had to take Celebrex daily, which was harmful for the gastroenteric tract, liver, and other organs. [Normally, to control a non-specific arthritis, I take 1 tablet in 1-2 weeks, or a 5-day course, or 1 week 1 tablet in 2 days, and this brings my condition back to the norm.] Taking Celebrex was also bad for the cardiovascular system and for the healing of the buttock"s injury, but I had no choice.


Next photos show that the plaster was put on awfully, in violation of standards and norms, and could destroy my hand, and, especially, the little finger:


Fingers were always swollen; the cuts have never healed (as the fracture, too) due to poor blood circulation; and, because of an abnormal pressure to the wrist and deprivation of blood circulation, an atrophy and degeneration of the soft tissue, muscles, etc. - started.


CHAPTER 3.


In next week, a giant all-buttock"s swelling has soften in its lower part, but the upper part (17x10x6cm), separated by an internal horizontal scar (left by the initial stair"s blow), was enormously swollen and very hard on touch, and maybe still bleeding. This internal horizontal scar was the most hardened strip, blocking the bruise liquid"s drainage. When I was waking up, it grew bigger, and all superficial veins of the r. leg became painful, and the leg became more and more swollen.


Offered no solution by the clinic, I sent the referral from ER to SLSC Verdun, and was given an appointment for 17 March 2020, Tuesday, 9:10. I met an opposition within my own family to my decision to go to CLSC, but - when I explained that I can not go there alone not only because of the cast on my right hand-arm, and not only because of giant hematoma that made for me difficult to walk, but, in addition, having problems with my right foot [a car went on my foot in July, 2019, under very strange circumstances, when I was climbing into this car], and said that I am going to call CLSC and ask for transportation - me and my older daughter: we manage to convince others that I should get assistance. (An additional reason was not to let me travel by Metro).


Despite my condition, and inability to seat, they kept me almost 3 and a half hours, waiting. I was called the last, when there were no other patients in CLSC (covid-19 + other circumstances) any more. People, who came after me, were called before me. This situation repeats itself everywhere since 2017, in exception of 6 doctors, whose offices I visited for years. When I asked the secretary and the nurse, why I was called to the doctor after all other patients, while arriving almost the 1-st, they did not say anything. By the discriminatory attitude, they exposed me and my wife to additional Corona-virus danger, and also manifested an inhuman treatment (in the end, I had to stay on the floor on my knees, with my head on chair"s seat, and, seeing this, the medical workers have continued to keep me waiting after all new patients who were coming after me).


The male doctor did nothing regarding my complains about the giant swelling hematoma (which, after 1 week, continued to swell more) and inappropriate and menacing cast. My complains about the lesions were also ignored. I explained about the internal scar and its role in blocking the drainage of the upper part of the hematoma, but the doctor did nothing. He did not care how I am going to survive at home with the cast of my right hand while not to be able to lay down on my right side. So, all my complains about hematoma, plaster, and groin pain were ignored. He also ignored the abnormal blood formula in my latest blood test.


Before I left, I asked directly for help in replacing the plaster, stressing that the fracture deprived of a normal blood circulation WILL NEVER HEAL, and that the plaster is actually crashing the fracture site; but without any success. I also told the doctor that the plaster not only too tight, but is also sliding up-down, pulling out my little finger up to the level of dislocation, but he ignored this complain as well.


When the appointment was over, my wife (after calling our daughter and finding out that our son-in-law is a bit late) went to the supermarket, and, standing near the CLSC"s door, I heard conversation of 2 people, one of whom said that - having a bruise - he was referred for an ultrasound, and now he obtained another appointment from the central secretary"s desk. If I caught and understood everything correctly, he was treated radically differently than me. Why?


Desperately searching for solutions, I sent several emails and faxes to clinics (Metro-Medic; Clinique Médicale du Sud-Ouest; Clinique Médicale Physergo du Sud-Ouest; etc.), to medical specialists, and to my family doctor.


Trying to avoid Verdun hospital (where a worse Covid-19 outbreak in Montreal just happened), I was expecting help from medical professionals from other medical institutions.


Fax to my family doctor.


I also sent several emails and faxes to Dr. Gdalevitch:


Trying to avoid dangerous visits to Verdun hospital, and being denied a solution to replace the plaster there, I contacted all clinics, where Dr. Gdalevitch is working, by phone and emails, but was denied an appointment, as well as Dr. Gdalevitch"s intervention. (see below)


A letter from Dr. Gdalevitch"s secretary with a message that the doctor ignored my calls and emails. Maybe, because all appointments at other (then Verdun and Notre-Dame hospitals") clinics are reserved exceptionally for patients with a private insurance?


And the walk-in-clinics (Metro-Medic, etc.), which I contacted, where closed due to the epidemic (just an excuse, because the public health system was destroyed long before the Covid-19, and by closing the clinics they did merely worse by forcing patients with no-virus-related emergences to sit for 9-24 hours in the most virus-spreading environment).


Only my family doctor responded calling several times and giving invaluable advices, which helped me to avoid the worse scenario. His advises how to treat the hematoma at home (if no professional help was available) improved the situation (together with my own comprehensive methods).


I"ve contacted Verdun Hospital"s external orthopedic clinic again on 18 and 28 March 2020, and the nice secretaries did everything to help me. However, when they transferred my calls to the nurse"s line, I got only the answering machine, and left a message, explaining the situation with the plaster, but no one called me back. On 1 April (Wednesday) I finally spoke with a nurse (stressing that stressing that the fracture deprived of a normal blood circulation WILL NEVER HEAL, and that the plaster is actually crashing the fracture site) who told me that if I want help in plaster"s replacement, I must come right away. I explained that I am still not mobile, and can not put on the closes myself or go without assistance, and at the given moment no one is at home, and requested an appointment at an exact given time-date, but was not offered such a possibility. Next time I called on 3 April (Friday), and spoke with the nurse. She told me to show up at Verdun hospital immediately, but when I asked her if she can promise that the plaster will be replaced, and that I will be not redirected to the Emergency Room, she did not respond my questions. When I asked, what for exactly I have to come, she said "we will see". Obviously, I could not go to Verdun hospital on such conditions in the midst of the epidemic.


Then I called the Verdun hospital on 7 April 2020 (Tuesday) 2 times, and 2-nd time I said that the situation with the plaster is alarming, that the plaster is causing unbearable pain, crashing my bones, braking the fracture site, preventing blood circulation even more, and so on. In response, the person, who spoke with me, said that they going to remove that plaster, and to replace it by another one right away. But now - a week ahead of the plaster removal on 14 April 2020 - I demanded an X-Ray (before the replacement) and possible lighter orthopedic support, instead of just another plaster, because the hand"s condition is now so bad that the whole hand now must be saved first. I was denied an evaluation of hand"s condition, X-Ray, and possible lighter orthopedic support, and, consequently, refused to come.


CHAPTER 4.


9 April 2020 (Thursday), the situation with the plaster became more alarming and urgent. The fingers became just enormously swollen; plaster"s pressure on the wrist became so intensive that blocked the blood circulation completely; etc. Because I had no time to go to emergency, I removed the plaster myself around 19:30, which was an extremely complicated and difficult procedure. [Below: the plaster itself, and the hand minutes after plaster"s removal].


In 19-15 minutes after the plaster removal (see the photos above) the swelling have been rapidly decreased. However, the photos show all signs of brutal plaster"s impact, like jammed and folded skin; red stains and straps of the injuries from an excessive pressure; the cuts on fingers" joints which did not heal within an entire month due the deprivation of normal blood-lymph circulation; wrist"s wavy traces perpendicular to the longitudinal plaster impact"s lines, and a trace similar to a trace of a very tight watches" thong or bracelets (sharp non-natural difference at the distal side of the carpal bones on lunar side); and so on. On palpation, there was a roller through the wrist at the internal side, left by the plaster, and a similar "roller" along fingers" proximal phalanx: a sign of deprivation of blood circulation.


(See the photo below)


The right palm"s exterior was all swollen, as the radius bone site.


In next 14 days, the brutal devastative plaster"s impact - in some aspects - has manifested even more (see next photos):


Comparing to the left hand, the right hand was all swollen and devastated:


Not just the hand, but also the arm was destroyed (degenerated) by the bad plaster and the refusal of solutions to replace it:


10 April 2020 (Friday) my family doctor sent me a referral for an X-Ray, and I did it same day at 1 of only 2 or 3 still open radiology in the city.


X-Ray report, 10 March, 2020 (left); and X-Ray report, 10 April, 2020 (right).


The fracture X-Ray image, 10 March, 2020 (left); and the fracture X-Ray image, 10 April, 2020 (right).


Comparing the images, we can see that before the plaster the swelling (watch the contour) was much smaller, and was concentrated mostly (if not only) in the fracture area itself, while after the plaster the swelling is much bigger, and includes the whole hand, the wrist, and all the fingers. The digit number 2 and the digit number 5 (little finger) are especially affected after the plaster, and are bent (especially the little finger). Deminerilisation and degenerative arthrosis was not an issue before the plaster. The healing of the fracture shows a small displacement under the plaster, and the direction changing by the broken-away piece.


All my suspicions have proven to be true: the fracture did not heal, but was in the middle of healing. I put then a light orthopedic support, which I ordered over Internet, and did some additional measures to prevent any possible damage to not completely healed fracture.


Even 2 weeks later the hand was always not functional, with many signs of damage. For example, the upper layer of the skin normally begin to detach (after the removal of a plaster) few days after, but in my case: 2 weeks after the plaster"s removal:


The skin and the soft tissue near the thumb was destroyed (and, beside, a yellow color of the damage from the plaster can be seen at the wrist level):


The knuckles were also damaged by the plaster; the veins popped out; it is impossible to unbend the fingers and the palm of the r. hand:


From 9 to 14 of April I massaged the right hand with my left hand; bended all the fingers (each phalanx separately) with the other hand, one finger at a time; assisted wrist flexion and deviation; did the warm compresses and water procedures; and many other things to reverse the atrophy and degeneration, and to restore fingers movement (in the same time, doing everything to avoid any harmful for the fracture movements and procedures), but without any success.


CHAPTER 5.


On April, 14, 2020, I had an appointment with Dr. Gdalevitch at Verdun hospital. She sent me for another X-Ray, refusing to compare it with the X-Ray which I did 4 days ago. However, what I saw on the computer screen is that during 6 days without plaster the fracture healed faster than during the whole entire month with the plaster. I also noticed that, in comparison with the X-Ray done on 10 Mar. 2020 (which I already managed to obtain from the archive), there some worsening: likely, due to the damage inflicted by the bad plaster"s alignment. Initially, the fracture was without any displacement; however, the plaster, which supposed to protect the hand and prevent any displacement, did the opposite: just made the fracture even worse.


Probably, this is why Dr. Gdalevitch unethically refused to comment about the details of the X-Ray in comparison to 10 Mar. 2020 X-Ray, and later refused to send me a copy of the radiologist"s report. I believe that (after 14 Apr. 2020) my phone was blocked from accessing the medical archive, as well as my fax-machine. However, in June 2020 I managed to go around this blockade, and send an official request to the archive. Here is the radiologist"s report (14 Apr. 2020):


Digital Text :


centre intègre

universitaire de santé

et de services sociaux

de Centre-Sud

de l'Ile-de-Montréal


Hôpital de Verdun

4000 Boul LaSalle Imagerie médicale

Verdun(Québec)

H4G 2A3


QUEBEC


Chambre :

Provenance : Clinique externe VERDUN - Clinique

Externe

Examen : 14-0-04- 2020 08:25

Médecins :

1116268 Méd. Gdalevitch, Marie (Réf.)


Dossier : 0000000000000000000


Réquisition z 202005227 8


Nom: GUNIN, LEV (M)

Mère : ELIZABETA KISIN-LESZCZYNSKI

Père: MICHAEL GUNIN


Adresse : 0000000000000000,

Montréal, H3KlC9

RAMQ : 00000000000000

Tel : 000000000000000

c.c. :


Rapport Confirmé le 14-04-2020 14:49:53


RADIOGRAPHIE DE LA MAIN DROITE


Renseignements cliniques :

Suivi fracture : 5e méta.


Constatations radiologiques :


On compare aux radiographies du 10 mars 2020.


Statut post-fracture oblique de la diaphyse moyenne du 5" métacarpe.


Alignement inchangé, avec léger déplacement dorsal du fragment distal et léger raccourcissement d'axe.


Progression d'une consolidation osseuse qui est d'aspect avancé mais encore incomplète.


Dr. Gdalevitch saw that I am not capable to move my fingers; to bend them; to unbend them; and that the little finger is destroyed, enormously swollen at the last proximal phalanx; that the external part of my palm is very swollen; and that all the wrist"s bones are dysfunctional. However, she did not examine my little finger or my hand by palpation (she only pressed on the fracture site to verify the pain level), she did not try to test the articulation of the digits, and she did not perform anything in exception of looking into the X-Ray images.


I am not a specialist, but I guess that there were few possibilities for further procedures: 1) to put another plaster; 2) to put on a lighter PROFESSIONAL orthopedic support; 3) to do a surgical procedure (operation); 4) to do additional exams and tests (ultrasound, EMR, etc.).


But Dr. Gdalevitch told nothing about the condition of my hand, about the situation and the prognosis, or about possible options, perhaps, because, 1) my hand was in such a condition that it was problematic to put on another plaster (some time was needed for the hand to recover); 2) an orthopedic device (not a plaster) is reserved for commercial patients only; 3) a surgery is risky in my situation, and also could throw a shadow on how my fracture was managed; 4) additional exams were ruled out because would compromise the cover-up attempts.


However, she gave me a referral to physiotherapy (not without a fight; only after my firm insistence), not because it was a favor, but because it was an easier way out. She also told me to do all possible exercises for the right hand, which I questioned because the fracture did not heal yet, and because of the condition of the little finger. Yet, Dr. Gdalevitrch said that even 80-90 percent healed fracture is "considered healed".


She said that I must take a soft ball, and to squeeze it for fingers functions restoration.


Dr. Gdalevitch has kept the conversation in such a format that I could not insert a single word, and was not given a chance to tell about the buttock"s hematoma. I only managed to express my worries about the little finger that was completely dysfunctional, swollen, and deformed, but Dr. Gdalevitch said that there is nothing wrong with this finger.


Meanwhile, after 2 months, the hematoma did not heal, and the internal scar was still hard and dangerous. The swelling of the upper part of the buttock (a bit higher then the initial blow) was abnormal.


3 weeks after the accident.


I sent the referral for the physiotherapy to Montreal General Hospital by fax right away, and in 3 days repeated the fax submission, underlying my alarming situation if the phone conversation, and was promised a call from a physiotherapist "very soon". I don"t know, what "very soon" means for them, but 3 weeks after nobody called me, and all my investigations were useless. I could not find out, what happened with my fax, and what happened with my calls.


Meanwhile, a call from Verdun hospital (despite a tragic epidemics situation there) followed right away, but I had to cancel a scheduled telephone talk with a physiotherapist because was going to do the ultrasound at this time (that happened later, when I got the referral).


On April, 15, 2020 (a day after the rendezvous with Dr. Gdalevitch), I called the Verdun orthopedic clinic, and demanded another rendezvous with her, because of the emergency situation with my hand. I also called New Brunswick Medical Center in Pointe-Claire, in an attempt to get a rendezvous with Dr. Gdalevitch there (to avoid dangerous epidemic Verdun hospital), but was denied. As I suggest, this option is only reserved for commercial patients.


Finally, I was given a rendezvous with Dr. Gdalevitch at Verdun hospital, for Tuesday, 21 April 2020 (around 11 a.m.), but in the morning I called the hospital asking for a telephone conversation with the doctor, instead of a physical appointment. Why had I take a risk, exposing myself to Corona-virus hot spot, if the previous rendezvous produced no solutions to the medical problem with my hand? (My closed ones were panicking when they heard about my next appointment at Verdun hospital, and told that, if Dr. Gdalevitch did nothing on April 14 to repair the damage to my hand, there are very low chances that she will do anything on April 21.)


I believe that Dr. Gdalevitch is a top-professional orthopedist, and, probably, a good person, but the system of greed, commercialization and privatization of medical services left her no means, resources, or tools to treat patients like me properly. What is the value of all the high-tech surgeries, which can assemble a bone from small pieces and restore its complete functionality, if the treatments of the most simple fractures without displacement (which were safely and successfully treated 200-300 years ago) are a failure for patients like me, who can not pay big bucks?


On the phone (21 April 2020), Dr. Gdalevitch asked me to try to unbend my right hand"s fingers with my left hand, which appeared to be impossible. Why did she could not do it on April, 14? I told her that the little finger is swollen and painful between the proximal phalanx and metacarpia-5 on touch; more pain from the inside (between the fingers); it is not possible to connect or even approach the little finger to its neighbor (number 4); after an attempt to connect these last fingers by force, the little finger changes its direction. Could she check it on April, 14?


All exercises which she advised to do I was doing already, and all water and other procedures I was already employed, yet, they did nothing till 21 April 2020, and later, till 1 May.


Here are photos of the little finger, which was badly injured and deformed by the plaster:


[see below]


Dr. Gdalevitch claimed that she knew nothing about the hematoma, but the chart-dossier"s note mentioned it on March, 10, 2020. I saw it when Dr. Gdalevitch was holding it in her hands. It was mentioned under the Renseignement Clinique:


ER chart, fragment. 10 Mar 2020.


Now, on the phone, I described the situation around the hematoma.


I demanded a referral for an ultrasound of the right hand and wrist, and of the right buttock and right leg (with Diplex and Double Doppler), and Dr. Gdalevitch agreed to send it to me by an email today (21 April 2020). However, she did not submit anything, and did it ONLY AFTER my 2 emails, next day (22 or 23 April 2020). When I looked at the referrals, I saw that she wrote not what she promised. Instead of the scan of the right wrist and hand for all possible pathologies, she mentioned only the fracture, and restricted the exam to ruling out blood. As to the hematoma scanning, she restricted it only to soft tissue, and excluded the leg. (I told her on the phone that the blood descended down the leg, which became very painful, and I suspect the posttraumatic thrombophlebitis).


(See below)


I am not a specialist, but for me (for an ordinary person) the violation of her promises looks like an attempt of cover-up after a rethinking.


My suspicions are supported by a referral, which she signed a week before. I think that it was an initial (original) referral for an ultrasound that Dr. Gdalevitch issued at Verdun hospital 21 Apr 2020, and planned to be performed in Verdun hospital. However, AFTER writing THIS referral, Dr. Gdalevitch has changed her mind, and replaced it by the referral presented above.


I managed to obtain another referral from another doctor, which mentioned wider ultrasound exam, and send all the referrals to Radimed: 1 of 3 still opened during the pandemics non-hospital radiolodies.


CHAPTER 6.


However, when I came to Radimed (Friday, 24 Apr 2020), they ignored the referral from another doctor, restricting the ultrasound exams EXCLUSIVELY to the fracture area. THIS, I suggest, was made in solidarity with an assumed cover-up.


For 50 minutes I was trying to explain that I sent them referrals from 2 different doctors, with 2 different ultrasound demands. To avoid 2 separate appointments at the peak of the Corona-virus epidemic, I wanted to convince them to perform the scan of the whole right hand, as was mentioned in the 2-nd referral. I strongly insisted that I don"t want an ultrasound due to Dr. Gdalevitch"s referral, but prefer the ultrasound due to the 2-nd referral - issued by St.-Henry clinic"s doctor. I said that I have a copy of the 2-nd referral with me on a USB flash memory stick, but the secretary claimed that they could accept only a print out. Then I reminded to her that I submitted the 2-nd referral by both email and the fax. She promised to hand it over to ultrasound"s technician, and ordered me to go to an ultrasound room.


The technician, a good man, has started to scan swollen parts of my hand, to rule out an internal hematoma, when I asked, which referral he follows doing the scan. He demonstrated Dr. Gdalevitch"s referral, and said that he has no other papers. When I explained that I submitted another referral, too, he left the room, and went to the secretary to obtain it himself, but returned empty handed saying that she could not find it. Coming back, he stopped scanning any other parts of my hand, restricting the scan area exclusively to metacarpia-5, and I had an impression that he was swiftly instructed to do so. So, the technician, who performed the scan of my right hand, did not received a command (from the secretary?) to base an ultrasound on the 2-nd referral, but only on the 1-st referral (from Dr. Gdalevitch), and scanned exclusively metacarpia-5, and, on my demand, the little finger (a bit), but not the whole hand.


When I returned to the secretary, I expressed my disagreement with her actions, and my disapproval of her refusal to hand over the 2-nd referral to the ultrasound technician.


In the beginning, the secretary insisted that they never received the 2-nd referral, but, finally, seeing that I don"t give up, she printed out the 2-nd referral, but said that for another referral I need another appointment.


Finally, the secretary gave me an appointment for an ultrasound of the whole hand for 29 April 2020, at 8:00 (a.m.), and said that this is for the 2-nd referral, for the whole hand. And added that the scan the buttock injury will demand the 3-rd appointment somewhere in May. However, when I came home, and looked at the paper that she gave me, I understood that she was lying and misleading me, because it was for the buttock scan.


Here is the paper that she gave me for the April, 29, appointment:


It was clear now that they completely ignored the 2-nd referral again. It was for the r. buttock, not for the hand.


29 April 2020


So, when I came on April, 29 (Wednesday), they performed a scan of the r. buttock, and refused to scan the whole right hand + fingers again. Same day, before leaving, I told the secretary that I want to obtain an ultrasound report. She said that the patients must wait 7 days for the report (5 working days), and that the report will be ready Friday. I said, OK, but I want to dictate my email address or fax to be sure that they could send it to me. But the secretary refused to write down my email address and a short memo how to sand faxes to me. Then I told her that I don"t permit them to send the ultrasound report to another doctor, and want it to be sent ONLY to Dr. Gdalevitch. Hearing no answer, I raised again the question of scanning my whole hand, due to the 2-nd referral. The secretary did not want to discuss that. When I insisted, the secretary said literary: we don"t do the whole hand"s ultrasound. However, on Radimed"s website (radimed.ca) the ultrasound of muscled and bones (musculo-skeletique) is mentioned without any restrictions:


And, again, when I insisted that I want to do an ultrasound for the 2-nd referral, she claimed again that they never received it, and, again, seeing that I don"t go away, she found it and printed it, but repeated that they don"t do the ultrasound scan of the whole hand.


I contacted a rheumatologist, who used to consult me once, and read him the 2-nd referral, asking if the radiology was obliged to scan the whole hand and all fingers, and he responded: yes.


Finding out that, I contacted Radimed Radiology by phone, but for 1 hour my persistent calls were blocked: someone steadily disconnected me manually. Then, finally, my call was answered, and I said I was there around 1 hour ago, and was refused an ultrasound of the whole hand. I gave my name, and said that I am looking for answers. The woman, who responded, pretended not to hear what I said, stating that for an ultrasound I need a referral, and that they don"t do the hand"s ultrasound every day. I repeated then that I"ve been there just 1 hour ago, and that I had 2 referrals for an ultrasound: 1 mentioning the fracture and demanding to rule out blood, and another one ordering an ultrasound of the whole hand. Then I read the 2-nd referral. Astonishingly, she responded that for an X-Ray no appointment is needed, and began to explain the conditions for having an X-Ray. I interrupted her, and said that this is not about an X-Ray, and that I already had an ultrasound scan at Redimed, but only 1 bone was scanned, that"s it. But when today (I said) I insisted that the whole hand must be scanned (due to the 2-nd referral), the secretary claimed that "we don"t do the whole hand". "Is that written on the paper "the whole hand", or it"s telling "only 1 finger", - she asked as if I did not explain the whole situation several times, and did not read her the 2-nd referral already. I then quoted the 2-nd referral again, and added that there is no indication in that referral to scan only 1 bone (and, by the way, the 1-st referral did not mentioned to scan ONLY 1 bone either).


At this moment she asked about my name (I gave my name at the very beginning). When I gave her my name, she said that the referral is ordering to scan only the 5-th finger (which was a lie, because even the 1-st referral did not mention to scan ONLY the 5-th finger). However, I was fed up, and closed my eyes at her lie, just stressing that she"s reading a wrong referral. She claimed that they only have the referral from Dr. Gdalevitch, and nothing more. I stressed then that I saw how the secretary has printed out the 2-nd referral, too, which I sent by email and by fax. She responded that she"s looking at what was sent by an email. I repeated that I sent the 2-nd referral by an email and by fax. Then it was a very long pause, and I thought to hang up, when she finally appeared again on the phone, and started to read both referrals, claiming that both referrals are about the 5-th finger, and have nothing to do with the whole hand. I repeated that, in my opinion, mentioning the fracture of metacarpia-5, both referrals don"t restrict the scan to the 5-th digit only. Then I was disconnected.


Thursday, 30 Apr. 2020, suspecting (after everything, what happened) that the radiology might block me an access to the ultrasound report, and wishing to know it in advance, I called Radimed Radiology, and demanded the medical rapport [1-st ultrasound (r. hand)]. A woman, who was speaking with me, claimed that they charge 10 dollars. I asked if they do exclude people whose socio-economic situation is very difficult. She responded that, if I DON"T WANT to pay, I"ll not be given the report. I told that I have no credit card, so, how I am going to pay? She said that if so, I must appear in person. I asked: "In spite of the epidemics?". She said: "Yes". I reacted by doubting that charging for medical report is lawfully, but, I said, I am going to bring 10 dollars, and asked her to add me to the list, otherwise the guards will not allow me to enter the Westmount square. Then it was a break, like she had to consider an answer, or was taking an advice from someone else, and then said: "We already sent the report to both doctors", - and disconnected.


Both Montreal General Hospital and Royal Victoria Hospital merely sabotaged my appeal for the physiotherapy and my fax with Dr. Gdalevitch's referral: just like the St.-Mary's Hospital never provided a physiotherapy referred by Dr. Schultz.


My communication with both hospitals in writing and via phone lasted 2 weeks, till, finally, both hospitals have made clear that I'll never receive a course of a physiotherapy there.


30 Apr. 2020 Thursday

At 11:00, I received a call from Verdun Hospital's Physiotherapy Department (Tel. 514-362-1000).


The format and the method of this so-called "physiotherapy" was an insult.


They insisted that exclusively a "telephone" physiotherapy" is available, without inquiring if I have a proper phone equipment, an adequate hearing, etc.


A women-physiotherapist made a lot of efforts to provide any help for me, but it was impossible because of my impartial hearing, my old and audiologically unsuitable phone, and due to a number of other factors.


Attempts to communicate in English or French did not bring any positive results, in spite of my perfect English and quite good French. The suggestions that the communication with me via phone does not work because I am not capable to understand the instructions - were also discriminatory: simplifying the truth.


Then they offered a video format: again, without consulting me - and without finding out if I have a proper equipment for that, an appropriate computer knowledge, a corresponding video communication device, etc.


At 18:00 the front door opened and then slammed. I was in the bedroom, and thought that it was my wife. I called her right away, but she said she is far away from home.


MAY 2020


1 May 2020


Friday, 1 May 2020, I asked my older daughter to speak with Radimed, and she called them. A woman, who was on the line, said that they already sent the report to 2 doctors, and, thus, it is not necessary for me to obtain the report. However, my daughter insisted, asking how, nevertheless, to get it. She received an answer that, allegedly, they don"t send reports by email, but only by fax, and the 10 dollars" charge was not mentioned at all.


When my older daughter has described the conversation with Radimed, I called there myself (around 13:30), and the very 1-st thing I heard was: the report is not ready + when it"s ready, it will be sent to 2 doctors. I said that I need it for myself. Then (again!) I was warned about the10 dollars charge. I wondered, why, when my daughter called, she was told nothing about the 10 dollars, and was only informed about exclusively fax submission of the reports. (I could also wonder, why they violated my ban to send the report to both doctors, and why my report is not ready, it they said that the waiting time is 5 working days - maximum, but I avoided this discussion). And, before I could say that I doubt the lawlessness of this charge, but I am ready to come with the 10 dollars for the report, or my daughter can pay for it, or they can send the report to my fax machine: I was disconnected.


Then my younger daughter called Radimed, paid the 10 dollars by her credit card, and was told that the result (the report) is not ready yet.


So, I had 2 dif. requisitions from 2 doctors for the r. hand & buttock ultrasound as complementary to each other. But the Radimed Radiology sabotaged my request for a joint test, or for the use of 2-nd requisition. Against my will they used only the 1-st. The technician scanned the 5-th digit + metacarpia + carpal, but in the report only the middle of metacarpia was mentioned. They also restricted the buttock"s scan report to a very tiny area, mentioning a "small hematoma", while it is very huge, and still hard and very painful.


1 month after the plaster removal I still can not bend or unbend my fingers, despite all exercises and physiotherapists' advise.


6 May 2020

In spite the offer of video-conference, I received a simple phone call again - at 13:00 - from Verdun Hospital's Physiotherapy department.


Besides the problem with communication, there was another problem: I already knew and tried almost everything that the physiotherapist was telling, but it did not help. Maybe, I just exercised not properly, but to improve it I had to see the physiotherapist personally, not speaking with her on the phone.


I consider a compulsory "phone rendezvous" a real hospitals' sabotage of medical services. Only people, who agree voluntarily for this format should be given this option.


11 MAY 2020

I sent a message to Dr. Viviott.


Right after sending this fax, I received a call from the social housing (16:02) 514-868-4812, Marie. The connection is obvious. Theoretically (it not true in real life), social housing could leave more money for medical needs. It is a prove that all my calls, emails and faxes are monitored and the information is sent to one place.


13 May 2020, Wednesday

13 may 2020: I talked to my family doctor, Dr. Rohan, by phone (at 10.15).

He gave me a referral to Dr. Sonea, the dermatologist.


On the same day (13 may 2020), the first session of the video-conference of the physiotherapy (scheduled at 13.00) has proved to be the same abuse and mockery.


As I later discovered, it was not the physiotherapists' fault, but it happened due to the cruelty of the System: because Dr. Imar Belarbi turned to be a nice man and a responsible and good professional (when I met him personally face to face).


ZOOM video-conference software is a dangerous and privacy violating program, in my opinion. Besides, a very poor explanation how to use it for medical needs, and, especially, for Verdun Hospital's procedures in particular, and no explanation - how and where to download it, how to install and use it: could leave other computer users (less advanced than myself) in a limbo.


Dr. Belarbi never called in time; he was too early (not in time), or too late with the difference of 1-3 hours! Using a very old laptop, and an instable version of ZOOM - I could not wait with the Zoom software running all the time while waiting for Dr. Imar Belarbi 's calls.


He never said it directly, but hinted that it was not his fault, and, as I can guess, he was put in such conditions and time-frames that could not physically call in time.


Besides, he did not know how to use the Zoom program properly during his communication with such patients as me (considering some sound and video interruptions, etc.), and could not hear me well. On my side, I also could not hear him well (his voice was too quiet or, on the contrary, so loud that could not be understood because of the sound distortion).


He could not understand my explanations that I already used most of the exercises, and that folding and unfolding the right hand's fingers by my left hand in a way, which he proposed, was too painful and too dangerous.


In addition, Dr. Imar Belarbi spent with me on Zoom just 10 minutes, which was absolutely not enough. (The doctor was indicated in my notes as M-e Imar Belarbi, but, considering all hospital's mess and awkwardness during the Covid, it could be another man).


27 May 2020, Wednesday

The second physiotherapy (again scheduled at 13.00) via video-conference was as useless as the first one.


Dr. Imar Belarbi (?) did not understand - how grave, how serious are the complications after the injuries and the harmful damage done by the plaster. He could not assume or did not believe that something similar could happen to a patient, and, consequently, his help was not efficient. Partially, it happened because Dr. Gdalevitch concealed the truth about the real complications (not speaking about their gravity), avoiding to mention in the referral anything specific. And, partially, it happened because the format of a video-conference, especially, in such a setup, was NOT for patients suffering from such serious and complicated problems as mine.


28 May 2020 - Thursday

An appointment with Dr. Viviott (12:00) did not bring anything positive again, because the clinic was blocking her help within the public medical system's frames.


29 May 2020, Friday

I supposed to meet one of my friends at 15.00, but our reunion was cancelled, and, still, police vehicles closely watched me this day.


31 May 2020, Sunday

I met my friend at 15.00, while being closely observed by the police.


JUNE 2020


1 June 2020, Monday

Finally, I received a call from Dr. Sonea (10:40), dermatologist (5122 Sherbrook West, officesonea@gmail.com).


I never met such a cynical, money-hungry shark with doctor's license.


2 June 2020

At 2:45, I supposed to see Dr. Gdalewicz (Gdalevitch), but came at the wrong time (my hearing problem); they promised to call with another appointment - but never called.


5 June 2020

At 1:30, I had a first physiotherapy appointment in person, with Dr. Imar Belarbi (Verdun Hospital, 4 etage - Departement de Physiotherapie - entry from Bl. LaSalle; tel. 514-444-5963 (M-e Imar Belarbi, cell), or tél : (514) 362-1000 poste 63465, fax: 514-362-2814 (poste 63465 - add if to speak).


This was cardinally different than the phone and video-conference "appointments".


Dr. Imar Belarbi's instructions and explanations played an important role in the further healing process, in contrast to completely useless phone and video conversations.


Besides, the doctor did not care about the formal and precise indications in the referral, and offered his help not only for the hand's rehabilitation, but for the whole musculoskeletal (locomotor) system's functions restoration after multiple traumas.


He helped me a lot to restore the functionality of the right wrist, shoulder, and elbow as well, deeply damaged by the plaster.


Another thing that he did it so briefly and hectically, that most of the patients on my place would did not catch anything. Only good prepared and having the basic medical knowledge individuals could understand his strikingly short lessons.


I don't know - why it happened, but I have confident in Dr. Imar Belarbi 's good heart and responsible attitude to his work, so, I blame the System for all things that made the normal medical help available ONLY for the rich or influential, or belonging to the governing elite-related circles people.


Judging by my observations, Dr. Imar Belarbi did for me everything he could do in the present outraged situation with the health care system in Canada.


10 June 2020 - 9:15

Another doctor, who helped me a lot to recover after terrible traumas, was Dr. Schultz, who called me on June 10, 2020, and gave me (on telephone) very important instructions, which (with Dr. Imar Belarbi's lessons, and with my own knowledge and stoical efforts) were essential for the recovery.


If not my own efforts and knowledge, Dr. Imar Belarbi's lessons, and Dr. Schultz's instructions, my right hand would remain non-functional forever.


26 June 2020

Dr. Gdalewicz (Gdalevitch) supposed to call me at 13:30, but she did not call, sabotaging the appointment.


However, there was an anonymous telephone call more then 1,5 hours after the scheduled time of rendezvous.


If it was Dr. Gdalewicz: then she violated the norms, because a call after almost 2 hours is inacceptable, and, besides, she disconnected so quickly (too early) that I had no time to pick up the receiver (she did not wait for the answering machine, and even did not leave me time to jump to the phone). Because I don't have a mobile phone, but used an old "conventional" apparatus, I not supposed to answer instantly. By all the norms, Dr. Gdalevitch was obliged to hold on unless 7-10 seconds - before disconnecting.


29 June 2020

At 9:15, I had an appointment with Dr. Roi, the dentist.


He prepared the dentures knowing that I'll not be able to use them anyways.


To the dentist I was taken by car (my wife was driving) - 8:50 - 9:15.


At the key points we met the police car 16-01, and 3 security cars, plus 3 "Chicken" cars - 12 times!


From the dentist I came home walking - 9:30 - 9:52.


At key points and on my way - I was all the time followed by the same police car 16-01. Besides, I saw also a "munic" car PNG-3202 (?) - 6 times; 2 security cars; and "munic" red mini-track - 4 times.


29 June 2020

At 14:00, came a call from Dr. Poliquin. He arranged repeated exams, which later were also sabotaged by the hospital administration as well.


JULY 2020


11 July 2020 (Saturday)

Between 14:00 - 15:00, I was at home with the piano tuner.


13 July 2020, Monday

After my written letter to Verdun Hospital's administration, in which I explained that could not get along with Dr. Gdalevitch, and demanded another orthopedic specialist, I, finally, got an appointment (at 9:20) - with Dr. Massea - an orthopedic specialist.


Dr. Massea appeared to be a completely different person than Dr. Gdalevitch, and had a completely different, human approach to my suffering. He evaluated my injuries much more serious than Dr. Gdalevitch, and his assessment was not like Dr. Gdalevitch's not just because he displayed more compassion, but, first of all, because he stated very different conclusions (than Dr. Gdalevitch's), and because he administrated a different treatment plan.


First of all, Dr. Massea replaced Dr. Gdalevitch's physiotherapy prescription (referral) by another one (his own), which specified the whole scale of my injuries, without the mocking restriction of the physiotherapy to an exclusively small (ridiculously small) area.


Secondly, he prescribed Tylenol to reduce the pain, and - besides - the right Tylenol.


Thirdly, he approved Dr. Schultz's prescription of Celebrex as a good measure for securing the healing process, a prophylactic of the side-effects' inflammation, and other complications from the injuries, and told me that, in his opinion, without Celebrex, I would never recover.


Fourthly, he agreed that the plaster was, probably, badly applied, and recognized an obvious damage, which originated not from the initial fracture, but from the plaster.


Fifthly, he also prescribed 2 additional medications, which had to help my fingers, hand, wrist, elbow, and shoulder to recover.


In addition, he spent with me not less than 30 minutes, carefully examining my fingers, wrist, hand, elbow, and shoulder, hematomas on my back, etc., and - at the same time - doing some healing physiotherapy and instructing me how to I can do it myself.


He issued a document to my local CLCS, for a course of procedures for horrific hematomas' treatment (compresses, etc.).


Only after my meeting with Dr. Massea, and his cardinally contrast approach, I clearly realized how cruel was Dr. Gdalevitch, and what level of damage she did to me without mercy - as if I was her personal enemy or a despised criminal. However, by my analysis and according to my sad experience, she is not as bad as some of the worst sadists among the doctors, and even not as unethical as many of her colleagues-medics, but, in the same time, she crossed an imaginary invisible red line of behavior, which should be never acceptable to people who want to call themselves medical practitioners.


22 Jul 2020, Wednesday

The appointment with Dr. Roi (the dentist), scheduled at 7:30, was cancelled because the

dentures allowance was not ready yet.


27 Jul 2020

In the end of July, I urgently needed a blood-urine test, and, having 4 requisition from 4 different doctors, has chosen my family doctor's prescription, which I used for passing lab tests.


However, my access to medical lab tests was completely blocked by hospitals.


Using Covid measures and restrictions as a pretext, two hospitals motivated the refusal "by Covid" (!). Other hospitals just blocked me an access to the tests, without even caring to explain - why.


The provincial and the federal government used the Covid situation for simply further converting the medical system into a political tool to harm dissidents, representatives of so-called "social ballast" (unemployed, elderly, handicaps, etc.), low-income citizens, and some other groups.


One of the hospitals, which blocked me an access to laboratory tests, was the Verdun Hospital.


I filed a complaint about an incident at Verdun Hospital, which was never answered by its ombudsman:


"J'étais chassé de l'hôpital du Verdun. On me dit que je ne peux pas là faire l'analyse du sang selon l'ordonnance du médecin que ne travaille pas dans cet hôpital. Ma question est : si cette prétexte est légal ?"


I called several CLSC-s: they claimed that don't do the blood test, while - in reality - it is not true.


Finally, I could pass the blood test exclusively at St.-Mary's lab.


However, 2 or 3 (as minimum) of the blood test report's pages just disappeared (were missing), and the urine test has vanished completely.


AUGUST 2020


12 August 2020

My family doctor administrated not only the lab tests, but also an MRI exam, scheduled at 12:30 at St.-Mary's Hospital, which objective was to check the gravity of the uterus' calcification.


This exam required the blood test of the strum creatinine.


20 Aug. 2020

My chronicle can make an impression that in the 2-nd half of 2019 and in 2020 I had too many medical appointments, which, allegedly, contradict the claims about the degradation of medical help in Canada and the sadistic tendency in health care. However, maybe even 1 third of all appointment were cancelled completely, or rescheduled for another day.


Here I indicated not all cancelled appointments, but just - selectively - some of them.


And the appointment with Dr. Roi, the dentist (13.10), was first cancelled by me as well - because I was suddenly given an appointment with Dr. Lesk at the same time.


Only when I called around 11 a.m. 19 Aug. 2020, it was changed to 20:30, the same day (20 Aug. 2020).


At 13:00 I had to appear in Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital, to see Dr. Lesk.


(More details are given in the part "Who Destroyed my Vision and Hearing".)


Considering the need of so many medical appointment, it is the Medical System itself (so-called "health care"), which provoked the overwhelming majority of them.


Taking, for example, into consideration the recurrent (in spite of 2 surgeries) urological problems and recurrent UT infections; new arthritis attacks; cardiovascular problems; and some other health problems, I came to a conclusion that they all are partially or completely related to untreated dental cavities and other dental problems. Government's refusal to cover dental care for low-income individuals and families (who cannot afford dental services) is emptying the moneybox resources of public health care faster than a fully covered public dental plan. Hundreds of urgently needed surgeries are delayed because of the untreated dental problems in patients, whose impossibility to use dental care is threatening by severe complications or death in case of transplantation surgeries, or a number of other surgical operations. Untreated dental problems are posing a risk to life of patients on chemotherapy, and some other categories of patients.


From my conversations with people, from my personal experience, and from the study of information available in newspapers, TV and radio channels, I came to a conclusion that the access to dental care is cut off from 60-70 percent of Quebec population. This vicious inhuman policy doesn't reflect an austerity (of the state resources), doesn't serves national interests: it serves only a very small clique of medical gangsters, who's profiting from the national tragedy.


The government policy, which reflects such savage aggressive profit-making on top of mass atrocities of the vulnerable population, is antinational, and matches a hidden motto of modern sinister repressive class: "not to heal, but to kill".


Inhuman advocates of this savage domination of the moral freaks will say that, at least, the teeth removal is available in most of the cases, and for almost all citizens, even if low-income patients are forced to extract semi-healthy and healthy teeth, but my case refutes such an allegation. Indeed, trying to get rid of the additional sources of infection, I resorted to an utmost step: to remove all teeth, together with the healthy teeth, and to have dental prostheses. However, the discrimination of unprivileged patients, and some other inequality factors instigated an even bigger problem: my jaw was damaged, the alveolar bones - broken, cosmetic defect provoked, my diction and even hearing affected, and no dentures will fit into my mouth in case if I lose the rest of my teeth.


It must be also taken into consideration that the dental surgeries "for beggars" have subjected me to such level of tortures (because of the damage to jaw and small bones, infections, and other severe complications, and - then - because of dentists' refusal to render further help connected to these complications) - that now I try to avoid any new teeth removal for any cost.


Now I am forced to delay teeth extraction as long as possible, regardless of the cumulative effect to body's inflammation processes, triggering UTI's, arthritis, cardiovascular problems, and so on.


26 Aug. 2020

Meanwhile, I was receiving the physiotherapy at Verdun Hospital, but now - more and more often - the appointments were canceled, and the dates were changed to later dates.


The same happened with the appointment at 8.00, which was changed to 1 Sept. 2020 - 8.00.


SEPTEMBER, 2020


1 Sept. 2020

The physiotherapy appointment at Verdun Hospital (8.00) this time took place as scheduled.


15 Sept. 2020

The physiotherapy appointment at Verdun Hospital (8.15) this time also took place as scheduled.


21 Sept. 2020, Monday

Today, I came at 15:00 to SOS Sourire dental clinic for checking the prostheses.


I am not sure that it was Dr. Roi (because of the mask and antiviral plastic protection), but, I think, it was him.


He told me not to press to the dentures hard, because this is just a model, and it is fragile. I asked how can I know then if the dentures are fitting?


He gave no respond.


I also told him that the dentures did not allow me to speak, but he assured me that this is because they are just a model, and when I"ll put the real dentures, it will be different.


He gave me a mirror, and asked if I am satisfied and if the color is similar to my own teeth.


I responded that my eyes were injured, and at the present moment I am not able to distinguish properly between the colors, and that this mirror is not corresponding to my vision.


I also noticed that only another person (my wife or daughters) could see all the details.


I saw that the lower dentures seemed to be more less OK, but the upper dentures have a curved ark, with 2 artificial teeth on the right are sticking out. However, I said nothing to Dr. Roi, because all my previous concerns were just bounced out by him.


When I was ready to leave, he suddenly said that I MUST sign a document, which was presented in such a way as if signing this document was conditional for getting the dentures - when they are complete.


In other words, it was staged so that aimed to bring to my knowledge that without signing this paper I will not get the dentures.


When he gave me this paper to sign, he did not read it to me, but only said that it is a consent for having the dentures done, and, when I did an attempt to read it myself carefully, he has started to speak and assure that this is "of no importance", and "just a formality", disturbing my concentration, and also began to move the paper, so, that I was not able to finish reading, especially having difficulty with my vision as well and having no glasses. Because I am an aged person, who survived a number of accidents, injuries, surgeries, and health issues, I am vulnerable to the pressure, and I signed this paper, without having sustained the pressure put upon me.


Here (below) is the test of this document:


"SOS Sourire Verdun

4941 Wellington Street

Verdun

H4G 1X8

Phone: 514-544-4441

verdun@sossourire.com


Date: 21-09-2020


Acceptation de l'esthétique prothétigue

Moi, Lev Gunin J_, se déctare satisfait(e) de

la couteur des dents, de ta forme des dents et de i'alignement

des dents de ta prothèse : P_

que Dr (e) : Roi

va mettre en bouche te : 21-09-2020


Dans t'éventuatité où i) y a un probtème esthétique, je m'engage à avertir mon dentiste traitant à i'essayage, avant que ta prothèse soit fixée ou cottée. Si après )a mise en bouche, i! devait y avoir des modifications esthétiques, ceux-ci seront effectués à mes frais.


Signature patient(e)


Acceptance of prosthetic aesthetics


I, the undersigned, _ hereby declare myseif satisfied with

the color, shape and alignment of the prosthetic

teeth that Dr. will install on:


In the event of any dissatisfaction regarding the aesthetics of my prosthetics, I hereby accept that it is my responsibility to inform the treating dentist at the time of fitting, before the prosthetics are fixed or bonded. Furthermore, I understand that any aesthetic changes required after the installation of the prosthetics are at my own expense.


Signature of patient

Signature of dentist"


This event revealed one of the most sinister (or even horrific) secrets of the Canadian health-care system.


I am sure that Dr. Roi is a compassionate person, and a good doctor and man.


And if SUCH a man commits such an obviously unethical act: there is something really appalling behind it.


From this phenomenon - to an obligation to kill a patient if the government will need it: is only one small step.


When good people are somehow forced to commit unethical acts, it sends a very dreadful feeling that we live in some wild medieval epoch of bloody tortures and massive slain of people without any moral consideration. Only during the most loathsome dark eras good people were left no chances but to comply with monsters' orders.


When - once - Dr. Roi asked me if I had a surgery on the right side, including the surgery on the gum, I told that I don't remember, because did not understand right away about what area he is talking. Then he said that it, certainly, was an optical flare in the computer.


If he did not care about the collective cover-up and mutual protection of the dentists' order, he had a duty to tell me about the damage, which did to my dental apparatus other dentists before him. But, if I did not explain anything myself, he preferred to call it "an optical flare in the computer".


When - later- I told him that the alveolar bones and the jaw were damaged during the teeth removal, combined - in the case of the upper jaw - with a surgery on the gum: he started underplaying the damage, saying that the jaw abnormal position of the right side can be partially compensated by special exercises, without making any comments about the damage itself.


Dr. Roi was perfectly realizing that no dentures could fit and be useful for me because of the damage to the jaw and to the alveolar bones, and he knew in advance that I'll not be able to weary the dentures. Only some special dental prostheses - MAY BE - could resolve this problem, but such prostheses can cost up to 10 thousand dollars, and, still, there are no warranty that they will fit considering all the defects, inflicted by the dentists in the past. Of course, I don't have not just 10 thousand CD, but even 200-400 dollars, and the government would never authorize for me dentures more expensive than the cheapest and the most primitive ones.


Why - then - I started this procedure, in the first place? Why I had to waste the public money, if I doubted that ANY dentures could fit me with the jaw and alveolar bones' defects?


Simply because Dr. Roi has managed to convince me somehow that it is possible to manufacture dental prostheses taking into consideration all the measurements and my individual features, and I started to believe in his lie.


However, 8 or 11 months later I came into conclusion that Dr. Roi was just lying to himself and was lying to me that the most primitive and standard dentures would be wearable in my mouth.


30 Sept. 2020, Monday

Dr. Roi at SOS Sourire (15:50) was again checking the prostheses.


OCTOBER, 2020


5 Oct. 2020

I supposed to have another course of the physiotherapy at 8:00, but forgot and did not come in time, and then it was too late.


It is nothing surprising, because under the number of stressful situations (taking just the dental saga is enough!) it can happen with everyone.


25 or 26 of Oct. 2020

A piece of a metal was in one of the prunes in the sack of Kirkland Sunsweet pack.


It was as big as almost a flash memory stick, and sharp as knife...


Miraculously, I did not swallow it and did not cut my tongue, or gums, or cheeks. If I swallowed it - I would die, and if I would cut something inside my mouth, I could die from the blood loss.


This packet of prunes we bought at Costco.


December 2020


Only in the end of December 2020, I partially recovered from my injuries, but a lot of post-traumatic problems with my hand, shoulder, and wrist - remained. This partial recovery took almost 1 year (!) - for a minor and, theoretically, perfectly healable fracture.


My suffering and such a long recovery were, in my opinion, a product of Dr. Gdalewicz's (Gdalevich's) negligence and indifference. If not Doctors Massea and Belarbi, and Dr. Schultz, if not the prescription of the anti-inflammatory (prescribed not by Dr. Gdalewicz), and if not my own titanic efforts and studies (only the fact that I was forced to remove the plaster myself is already a scandalous thing!): I would never recover from the injuries.


DECEMBER 2022


28 Dec. 2022

Since November 7, 2022, I have a flue again: this time, only painful throat, and - sometimes - a running nose, and no other symptoms. At the present time, this light flu (virus?) still did not pass.

Running forward: I was sick till 4 Jan. 2023.


CHAPTER 6. January-February 2023.


2023


JANUARY, 2023


6 Jan. 2023

SERIOUS FURUNCLE - left arm.


11 Jan 2023, Wed.

The key from the postal box disappeared.

The municipal bureau has sabotaged a new key the whole month.

Finally, my wife called them with an ultimatum, and the concierge came with the key, but was extremely angry and screamed on me.


13 Jan. 2023

Dr. Poliquen called me precisely at 9:30: he was always as punctual as Dr. Rohan.

Trying to find out at what time was really scheduled the appointment, I did not ask Dr. Poliquin about it, but thanked him for calling so punctually, and he responded that, as the appointment by phone was at 9:30, this is his direct duty to contact the patient in time, if the circumstances allow it.

So I discovered that the appointment was at 9:30 indeed, and that the secretary, who called me about the appointment, just mocked at me.


I must remind here that, answering this call from the Verdun Hospital, I received only the date (13 Jan. 2022), but not the time of the appointment. But when I asked about time, she told me that the appointment is "par telephone", and that I must wait for the call "tout la matin".


On my astonishment, she just repeated that there is no scheduled time, and that the doctor can call at any time during the whole morning hours.


This next plot can be put into the same category as an appointments sabotage.


18 Jan. 2023

Today, it was a sad day for me. Dr. Rohan contacted me by phone the last time (again: precisely at 9:30). He is retiring, and I don't have a family doctor anymore.

He fulfilled all my requests, and wished me all the best.

I wished him the same, and added that the new generation of doctors is very different, and, among them, the altruists occupy a smaller place than among the doctors of his generation.

He agreed with a sad and a bit lyrical intonation.

During all 20 years, he did for me more than any other doctor, and, I believe, saved me from several disabilities, and, maybe, even saved my life.

Only since 2020, I realized how difficult it was for him in the circumstances when the government is using inhuman repressions against his patient, including the persecutions in the medical institutions.

And several moments of the discrepancies in our relationship, and some of his actions and inaction - are seen in a completely different light because of this.


FEBRUARY 2023.


1 - 10 Feb. 2023

Since 13 Jan. 2023, I cannot book an appointment for the tests, issued by Dr. Poliquin.

It looks like I am persona non-grata in the laboratories and diagnostic officies.


13 Feb. 2023

Since Jan. 13, 2023 (again, the digit "13"), I have another flue.

A Covid-test is negative.


19 Feb. 2023

The whole week I am sick.

There is no real cough, but I feel like the respiratory tract is blocked, and I have difficulties breezing. I never had anything like this in my life.


No running nose, no painful throat.


20 Feb. 2023, Monday

No flue anymore. No bronchus-lungs obstruction.

Everything passed almost without a cough.

Everything passed in 4 hours: like, here is a light cough, I still have difficulty breezing, and - after 4 hours: no cough anymore, no breezing obstruction.


23 Feb. 2023

(Soviet Army Day, and

the 1-year anniversary

of the conflict in Ukraine)


Stomach-intestines strong pain. When drinking hot tea, and putting warm clothe to the stomach: there is a relief from pain.


Liver and kidneys pain is also present, and signaling about a poisoning, or about a serious infection.


After noon, I was sitting on the computer in the salon, preparing a browser for a particular web page, which url I typed in the browser window. However, I was too sleepy at that moment, and went to the bedroom, and fell asleep. When I returned to the salon, there was an endless line of slashed after the url, and, if I did not type it - then WHO? It is impossible that I leaned on the keyboard, because it placed far ahead and a bit above. A little lamp in the salon, served for the purpose of seeing the names of the books, was now turned on. But when I left for bedroom, it was not turn on!


What else was not like any other day?


I found an insect in the bathroom; this types of bugs never live indoor, especially at winter. How did it get to our apartment, on the first place?


(See below):


A plastic box with hummus is broken this time, and might be contaminated.


24 Feb. 2023, Friday


Very strong fever (shaking); temperature 37.9; headache; stronger stomach pain.


25 Feb. 2023, Saturday

Abdomen (stomach) pain; diarrhea; headache; very strong fever (shaking).

Blood pressure: 120 x 70; pulse: 90, while my normal pulse is 60.


I went to a doctor in Laval (my wife accompanied me).

In the Metro train, 2 people sat (at neighbor seats, located not perpendicularly, but parallel to the wagon's (car's) wall) right opposite to me, along the opposite window: a black man in his 30-s, and a women of indefinable age (from 20+ to 40+), who looked like a native American or an Asian. He was seating straight, as normally seats a passenger, and she was seating across the bench, with her back to the man.

They pretended not to be knowing each other, but my studying eye noted that the 2 are a particular pair of people, who have some relation to each other.

My suggestion has been confirmed, when they both followed me inside the Cartier Metro station, when my wife and me - we get off the Metro train.

At first, the black man sneaked behind my back, and purposely went step by step behind us, surely trying to spot - what we do and what we are taking off the pockets. Then the woman replaced him behind us, surely trying to overhear - what we are talking about. It means that she had to understand both Russian and German dialect (or just Russian): languages, which we use for communication in public places.

When I suddenly stopped (on purpose) - she almost "flew" on me, and was really confused and even afraid that I "cracked" who she is. She went ahead - and did all possible attempts to get lost in the crowd, and to become "invisible". However, I spotted her 3 times, before she sneaked into a small shop inside the huge bus station.

Her workmate threw the hood on his head, tried to change his gait, and to pretend that he is another person, but this did not serve him at all. At the same time, he was clearly afraid to lose us from his sight, and, in spite his desire to disappear, followed us several times inside and outside of the bus station, and hid or "vanished" shortly before our departure. The woman re-emerged 5 min. before our departure, and disappeared in the opposite door (which leads to other buses).

Near the clinic, we were watched by an Amazon bus.


Before going to the doctor, I wrote on a piece of paper:


1. Since Jan. 13: the whole family was sick. No running nose; no throat pain; but the respiratory tract was blocked, and I could not breeze normally. It was very frightening; never happened to me.

2. Since Jan. 20: no sickness anymore; it passed in 4 hours, during which the indisposition disappeared, and the bronchial tubes and lungs were completely cleaned, and I started to breeze normally. Almost no cough from 13 to 20 Jan.

3. Since 23 Feb. 2023: stomach - intestines str. pain; kidneys-liver pain; finger inflammation and pain. After drinking hot beverages, or putting warm clothe to the abdomen - the pain disappears.

4. 24 Feb. 2023: fever; headache; stronger stomach pain; temperature 37.9.

5. 25 Feb. 2023, in the morning: diarrhea; headache; blood pressure 120 x 70, pulse 90, while my normal pulse is 60.


Shortly before leaving home, I added the 6-th point: "I suggest blood-urine tests". I also took Dr. Poliquin's requisition for the laboratory tests with me.


The young doctor appeared to be a good specialist, because she asked right questions and did the right exams. She also was very respectful to my explanations and the description of the symptoms, and did not interrupt me. However, she did not check if my tongue became coated: probably, because she was afraid of Covid, and did not want me to remove the mask; she was wearing her own mask very carefully, which is surely an indication of her fear of Covid. (By the way, my tongue was normal, not covered by white fur).


Dr. A. (Anna?) Lesperance had run over the paper that I gave her, and had only 1 question: about the details of the rapid and unexpected recovery from an acute flue in just 4 hours. She ignored my plea for the laboratory tests.


I also gave her to see Dr. Poliquin's requisition, commenting my gesture by telling that - since the beginning of January - I am not able to book an appointment for the tests, and I am asking her help, taking in consideration an acute poisoning or infection, which I am presently endure.


However, she did not respond to my plea as well.


She also ignored (or just not quite catch: because our conversation was erratic due to my aggravated during the flue hearing problems) my warning that I may not afford any payable medication, and prescribed rather expensive pills for stomach burning (not what I needed, because I had only cramps and grips, but not heartburning or stomach burning).


Having now more profound knowledge about the System, and more experience, I can guess that this good doctor did not follow her duties fully (as she did not administrate the lab tests), probably, because of some twists of the System, rather than because she was already instructed about me. Having retrospectively re-evaluated some actions of such very good and very ethical doctors, like Dr. Rohan, or Dr. Viviott, I became aware of the fact that the System did not leave them other choices in that particular frame of circumstances. In most of the situations, I can read people, and my experience told me that Dr. Lesperance is a good person working in an inhuman and offensive health care system's environment.


26 Feb. 2023, Sunday

Hemorrhage in the left eye.

Still stomach pain.


27 Feb. 2023, Monday


Stomach pain.

Unusual heart beat (tachycardia).

An annoying rash above the feet on both legs, with big bright red flat papules.


28 Feb. - 4 Mar. (Saturday), 2023


The rash is expanding becoming more annoying. It is very itchy and burning like a burn.


On Mar. 3, 2023, I passed the lab tests (my older daughter managed to find a niche in a rarely visited place, and booked an appointment for me). However, the urine test was not done, because was not indicated in the requisition.


I tried to reach Dr. Poliquin since last Wednesday unsuccessfully, and got through ONLY Friday morning (March 3), but this was too late. In spite of the best human approach of his secretary, I could not change anything, because Dr. Poliquin was absent at that time.


In the lab in East Montreal, I was also touched by the human treatment and politeness of everyone, who registered, processed, and managed my requisition and ID, and, especially, by two women: a middle-age registrar, looking like an immigrant from India, and the nurse (white 58-60 y.o. woman of Quebec origin; maybe with the English background), who collected the blood sample. If all health workers were like them: it would be already the best therapy for the sick people.


MARCH-APRIL 2023

When my family doctor retired, an access to medical care was almost completely blocked for me in general. The government cynically used Covid pandemic for blocking an access not only for people like me, but for 15-20 percent of population as well, planning to get rid of conscious objectors and of so-called "social ballast". Using Covid pandemic as a pretext, the ruling elite introduced a policy of the pre-registered appointment for any laboratory test, which made possible to a) cut a considerable part of population from timely and necessary laboratory tests, and b) to redevelop methods of lab tests' sabotage so that now it is entirely government's affair: to release an objective true medical data, or to destroy any of genuine medical exam.


As the government established an online policy for any medical appointment, it is becoming harder and harder to book an appointment by a telephone call, and a number of opportunities to see just ANY doctor have shrink almost down to "0".


And because my access to medical (private and governmental) websites is constantly sabotaged, not only an appointment with a doctor, but also an appointment for a blood-urine test is becoming a hardship.


Most of the time an access to Canadian (and Quebec) medical web sites is blocked for me (for additional information see book 8 of this chronicle: "Police Intimidation and Digital Terror" [(3) Systemic sabotage of phone line, Internet-access, and email services; innumerous disconnections of Internet and phone. Blockage of medical, educational, and other web sites. [Internet-Emails Sabotage 1997-2021.]).


For weeks (and, sometimes, for 1-2 months) I am disconnected from the most essential Quebec-Canadian web resources, not been able to access my laboratory tests, to book a medical appointment, or to book an appointment for a blood-urine test. I am using the updated and adequate web browsers, and there should be no problems with browsing and accessing the web resources from the technical point of view. There no problems with my computer systems, or with anything else that would limit or restrict my access to medical web sites. My browsers' configuration is common, like browsers of other Internet-users. Thus, my difficulties could be explained exclusively by politically-motivated persecutions, especially that there are also some indirect indications of this. For example, when, in April 2023, I accessed the mapquest website, it displayed the view of my last request back in 2015: a part of Glen site environments' map. However, since after 2015, I have another computer, another modem, another Internet-provider, another IP-address, and so on. There are no any non-system (personal) files in my "net" computer; no anything that could expose my identity. There are no cookies or cash files, which would be left after accessing web pages with my personal data; no passwords: nothing that could betray my identity to web sites. Besides, I am sitting behind a rooter wall, and my "net" computer is connected to the rooter and the modem by a wired connection, which does not allow intruders to see wireless avatars of other Internet-users around me, and, consequently, to calculate my exact location, my exact address, and my exact identity. Until Rogers' intentions to buy Videotrone, web sites like webquest could not crack my identity; the caller-ID function was not disconnected from my phone line; my phone-Internet connection never suffered from frequent disconnections (as before 2016); and I had NO problems with my current Internet provider.


During 2016 - 3 November 2022 period, I had only once a problem with my present Internet-provider, and, after my report of the problem, they immediately intervened, and the problem was operationally solved in hours. NOW I and my daughter - we contacted my Internet-phone provider few times, reporting multiple problems (from disconnection of the caller-ID function, to frequent disconnection from educational and medical web resources), but they never called back.


I believe that my access to Quebec-Canadian web resources is blocked on both levels: on the level of the medical web sites, and on the level of the technical facilities, which stay higher than my Internet-provider. See below:


Not only my access is systematically blocked, but the data of my laboratory tests and other exams is systematically illegally delayed, blocked, or destroyed.


For example, in the beginning of January 2023, Dr. Poliquin administrated a blood and immune test, signing a corresponding requisition. However, only in March 2023 I managed to get an appointment for these tests.


Till mid-April, I either could not access my medical file online in general, or the data on ALL laboratory tests was blocked altogether: the icon for the lab tests was simply "missing"! Normally, there are must by 5 icons: Rendez-vous; Médicament; Imagerie médicale; Services médicaux; Prélèvement; but - till mid-April - the 5-th icon was just removed for me! (See below):


When, finally, I was allowed to access the Prélèvement link-index (the beginning of April 2023), these 2 tests on the same requisition (done in March 2023) were still unavailable. Only in mid-April the blood-test report appeared in my medical chart, but the immune test was always missing. The message was saying that the immune test must become accessible before the 13 of April 2023, but - in the end of April, - my access to this test was still blocked (see below):


Besides, the government's web site illegally compromised my personal email address, displaying it without my consent. I never entered my email address online into any of medical web pages.


When the governmental web site was blocking all my tests altogether by removing the icon-link of Prelevement (it appeared only on 12 Apr. 2023), I called to book a rendezvous with Dr. Poliquin (11 Apr. 2023). Verdun Hospital's attendant tried to help me, but, first, the telephone reception was unacceptably bad; another person's voice (a female voice) frequently interrupted our conversation; there was noise-clicking on the line; and for my already declined hearing it was an atrocity; and, thus, I could not communicate normally with the man, who answered my call. Secondly, he advised me to book an appointment with Dr. Poliquin, and to ask the doctor directly to make the immune test's copies available for me. However, this advice violated any logic, because it is a nonsense to advice someone, who is calling the right phone to book an appointment, to book an appointment! I told from the very beginning of the conversation that I need an appointment with Dr. Poliquin, and, in the end of our conversation (seconds before disconnecting), this person "advising" me to get an appointment!


I cannot explain that, and, consequently, I am not going to blame the person, who spoke with me, but one thing is abundantly clear: is that all (and any) medical appointments are presently blocked for me by the government. For example, before his retirement, Dr. Rohan told me that he is arranging my appointment with a surgeon (concerning a lesion on my neck), but 5 months later nobody contacted me (and, I am afraid: will never contact).

[10 minutes after writing about the inaccessibility of my appointment with the surgeon, I received a call from his office, and got an appointment on the next day. I don't believe in such "coincidences". In this chronicle, I presented dozens of similar examples, which suggest that not only my telephone conversations are tapped, but that everything that I am typing on the computer is registered and becomes known to those spies. There are few ways to know - what someone in typing on a computer, which never goes online: from spy-cameras' clandestine installation - to reading and decoding the electromagnetic oscillations in the electric circuit, or recording the keyboard noises and decoding them into a digital text.]

[Next day, 27 Apr. 2023, Thursday, I was seen by Dr. Carl Emond (in St.-Mary Hospital's Outpatients' Clinic at 37777 Jean Brillant).


Dr. Emond behaved hostile from the very moment he saw me. He started the conversation not from the nature of my health problem or problems, but from a question - what went wrong with Dr. Sebastian V. Demyttenaere: why I stopped visiting him, and came to see him, Dr. Emond, instead. In my opinion, it was a non-ethical attitude, and not an ethical beginning of conversation with patient.


I did not want to complain about Dr. V. Demyttenaere; especially, that he might be a good person; just I had a bad luck with him. So, I just said that I did not get along with Dr. Demyttenaere.

Then Dr. Emond said that he's assessment is just a "second opinion", and I understood it as his unwillingness to help me.

I showed him the lesion on my right shoulder (bordering neck), the cyst on my back, and a cyst or infiltrate on my forehead, which, after many years, started to accumulate again, and told the doctor that I want all 3 to be removed.

Dr. Emond denied me surgical help, saying only that the cyst on my shoulder is "too small".

He administrated a new ultrasound, which is "0", nothing.


In the same way, doctors just played for time before the lesion on my forehead calcified, disfiguring my face forever, and not only disfiguring my face, but also making my right eye smaller, and causing other complications as well.

I must stress that it is too early to form an opinion about Dr. Carl Emond. He can be a good doctor and good man. Some old men hide their compassion and their good intentions behind a surface harshness, or even hostility.

However, my visit to him left an unpleasant aftertaste.


Maybe, I don't understand or don't know something, but all doctors, whom I visited in the past concerning cysts and other lesions, at least, looked at them and touched them, but Dr. Emond even not stand up, and continued sitting. It was an impression that he squeamish about touching me for some reason: more likely, because of my socioeconomic status, or because he was really hostile, and planned to do nothing about my problems.


From the very beginning, I told him that I have an impair hearing, but he started to speak even more in low tones. When I repeated that I can not hear well, and asked to speak a bit louder, Dr. Emond responded with an irritation: "Can you speak English - at least!?". Even if I would not speak English adequately, it can be interpreted as an insult and a discriminative remark, but, taking into consideration that I speak English almost like my mother-tongue, such a remark is even stranger. But, I repeat, it is too early to form an opinion, and Dr. Emond might mean something completely different, having some other considerations on mind.


When I asked Dr. Emond - why he did not give me a requisition for ultrasound, he said: "You'll be called". However, my negative experience with doctors includes 2 episodes, when doctors said that they administrate exams (CT-scan; ultrasound), but later it cleared up that they administrated nothing, and just deceived me.


Thus, the future will show if Dr. Emond is a good doctor and a good man, or, on the opposite, he has just bad intentions.


On May 1, 2023, at 8:30, I received a phone call from St.-Mary Hospital's outpatients' clinic. The secretary asked me - if I want to reschedule an appointment with Dr. Emond, or just cancel it. I said that I don't understand - what she's talking about. Then she specified that they need to know it - because, allegedly, I did not show up at the appointment with Dr. Emond on 27 Apr. 2023. "It is written here that you were absent", - she told.


I was astonished, and stressed that I HAD an appointment with Dr. Carl Emond. She was - clearly - confused and surprised, and murmured: "I'll call you back".


It is obvious that it was just another, a new provocation against me. It is also obvious that Dr. Emond was not a participant in this provocation, because, otherwise, he would not give me a paper, which confirmed my appointment with him.


Now, I must remind - what happened with Dr. Demyttenaere.


6 Oct. 2021, Wednesday

Around 10:45 I was seen by the surgeon - Dr. Sebastian Demitteneran (or Sebastian V. Demyttenaere) [St.-Mary's Out Patients Clinic; 3777 Jean-Brilliant, room 14], to whom I was referred by Dr. Rohan.

Dr. Demyttenaere appeared to be a nice young man, very polite and sympathetic, and, it looked like there was a mutual sympathy between us.

Dr. Demyttenaere was willingly ready to remove the cyst (on the old scar) from my back, which caused so many problems for last 10 years, but I complained about another cyst (or a tumor), on my right lower neck - high shoulder, which I considered now more menacing.

He administrated an ultrasound, and told me to book an appointment as soon as the ultrasound report is ready.


2 Dec. 2021

Dr. Rohan had to see me at 10:00 in person in his office, instead of calling by phone, because he needed to see my dermatological problems (and cysts) himself; otherwise doctors-specialists did not want to deal with a new patient.

And because Dr. Demyttenaere did not expressed any opinion about the lesion on my shoulder, waiting for ultrasound's results, Dr. Rohan has assessed this problem as well, telling that it is not a lipoma, and not a tumor (as I suggested), but a cyst. The next ultrasound (late 2022) suggested a tumor, so, Dr. Rohan might be wrong. In Dr. Rohan's opinion, this lesion will disappear by itself. However, like Dr. Beatrice Wang, and 4 other doctors, who suggested the same about other lesions, and were mistaken, he was wrong, too.


15 Dec. 2021

Dr. Demiteneren [Sebastian V. Demyttenaere] (St.-Mary's Hospital's outpatient clinic's surgeon - room 14) was supposed to see me at 8:30, but another - a new - conflict has developed at the entrance of the medical pavilion at 3777 rue Jean-Brillant.

The security guard - a high black guy - demanded to replace my anti-Covid mask with provided by him hospital mask.


I said that I have no confidence in the hospital mask, and that my mask is brand-new, and I did not remove or lowered it before coming to the hospital.

However, this guard (a 32-34 y.o. man) did not want to listen.

Then I said that I'm going to replace the mask, which I am wearing, by another - new - mask from a brand-new (sealed!) pack in the original packing, which I have with me.

However, the guard was stone-stubborn, insisting on the formality no matter what.

No argument (that, for example, he is giving me a mask without the cover, which is not sterile anymore, while I want to pick up a mask from a new sterile pack) were accepted by him.

Finally, I said that I am leaving, and that all the consequences and the damage to my health caused by the blocked access to the doctor will be on this cruel and tyrannical practice of illogical twisted mask policy.

In that moment, one of the white nurses that stood near the second - internal - door, also serving as guards of the mask policy, has approached me, and told that - OK - I can enter the clinic, but I must, firstly, to change the mask that I am wearing to a new mask, which I have with me, and, secondly, to put the hospital mask on top of my own new mask.

I agreed to her conditions, and complied, being allowed to enter the clinic.

However, inside, after passing 2 secretaries and registering my visit, I was approached by a woman, who started to ask me weird questions, and behaved like a policeman. Then another woman in the white gown approached me with similar wild questions.

It is very likely that the 2 women were a team of the governmental servants (doctors or social workers, or etc.), whose function is to enforce the pathologization of decent and to crash any resistance to all neo-totalitarian tendencies.

When I, finally, entered the room number 14 (not really a room, not really an office, but a segregated by glass walls cube), Dr. Demiteneren [Sebastian V. Demyttenaere] was not alone, but with a young-looking woman in civil clothing, and in a Muslim shawl on her head. There was no identification card on her.

I asked Dr. Demiteneren [Sebastian V. Demyttenaere] if she is not a policewoman, a psychiatrist, or a social worker, explaining that - before seeing him, - I had a conflict with the guard, and, in such occasions, they use the practice of pathologization of any disagreement with governmental agents or the governmental policy.

The woman was very confused, but Dr. Demyttenaere has comforted her, stepping right to her and surprisingly frivolously supported her by rubbing her back (or by some other movement: I don't remember exactly), and declared that she is a trainee (an intern), and belongs to the same medical domain as he himself.

However, the young women became even more confused, and no sign confirmed that he was telling the truth. On the contrary, her reaction would provoke a suspicion in anyone that she is a good person, who is feeling the pangs of remorse because forced to do something that contradicts her code of ethics.

When I asked her (through Dr. Demyttenaere) - what she things about my problem, she became even more tangled, not able to say anything, and surely knowing nothing about my case.

Then I asked if she has an identification card or in ID, which proves that she's a surgeon, Dr. Demyttenaere did not let her to speak, and, again, rejected my insinuations as completely groundless. The young women, in her turn, has made an attempt to leave this small glass cube (called "room number 14"), but Dr. Demyttenaere comforted her again, did not let her to do anything, and - again - rejected my demands.

And, finally, I said that I am against the presence of other people in the room during the appointment with Dr. Demyttenaere, but he just ignored my declaration.

After the development of the above mentioned ethical conflict - I did not want to speak with Dr. Demyttenaere anymore. He violated the basic rights of a patient, first, by not asking patient's consent (allowance) for the presence of strangers (of extraneous persons) during the appointment; secondly, by not providing a clear identification of the person, who was present in the room; and, thirdly, when I disagreed with the presence of the intern (or whoever she was), he, still, ignored my declaration of non-consent.

I did not leave the "cube" right away just for seeing - what will happen then; and Dr. Demyttenaere did not assessed me, did not even asked me to remove my winter jacket; he only said that he finds the removal of the lesion on my lower right neck (higher shoulder) unnecessary, and that's all. When I asked him about the nature of the lesion - concretizing my question by asking if it is a cyst, a lipoma, or a tumor, - he could say nothing. I just asked him if he really saw the ultrasound's report, and he said affirmatively. However, I doubt it, if for no other reasons then for the ultrasound's report's date (by then, only a preliminary report was ready).

Dr. Demyttenaere's primary obligation was - at least - to diagnose the nature of the lesion by physically assessing it, but he did nothing.

If he was perplexed by my disagreement to have another person in the "room" - then he had 3 options: 1) to send the intern away; 2) to clear up her identity, by showing her ID card or a student card (if she was a student; because she looked a bit older than an overage student); or 3) to administrate another appointment. However, he did nothing.

Thus, Dr. Demyttenaere might be a good person and a good doctor, but he must be ready for any situation, and to defend the rights of a patient, but, unfortunately, he did the opposite...

And now, instead of friendly Dr. Demyttenaere, I was facing a hostile Dr. Emond, and the System don't open any solutions to my health problems again...

Concluding about my visit to Dr. Emond, I must stress that it was even worse than a refusal of the appointment with a doctor; or, putting it differently, a "double refusal".]


[A removal of the small cyst and infiltrate on my forehead had to be a very minor, very quick, and very inexpensive surgical procedure, but it was cruelly denied, and provoked major complications: calcification with the formation of a big cone-knob, which disfigured my face, and caused a number of other significant complications.

A removal of the small cyst on my back had to be a very minor, very quick, and very inexpensive surgical procedure, but it was cruelly denied, and provoked major complications: a life-threatening abscess, and - later - 2 more episodes of inflammation and abscesses; courses of antibiotics; extremely painful surgery; and 6 months of healing; 10 times bigger public health system's resources; lot of doctor's time; and so on.

If these moral freaks did not deny 2 very miniscule surgical procedures, I would not have my forehead disfigured, would not suffer from 2 major abscesses, and would not strained the public health care resources.

Now, the same repeats 12-th time in a row during last 20 years, and I am - again! - denied the removal of the cyst on my back, the tumor on my shoulder, and the accumulating (again) infiltrate on my forehead.

What a sadistic, torturous SYSTEM!]


Regarding a major deterioration of my vision (see: sabotage of music works), I called 2 times since 4 Apr. 2023 to the eye-clinic, demanding an urgent appointment with my ophthalmologist, but my appeals were completely ignored: no one contacted me. If I had a significantly high IOP, I could become already blind. This is how the medical "justice" is working in Quebec.


My appointments with a urologist, and with other doctors - are blocked altogether.


In my old age, and in my health situation - totally cutting an access to medical help is the same as an assassination attempt.


This is the sad reality that we all are facing, but people like me are in a worse situation than anybody else.


_______________________


Lev Gunin


THE PUNITIVE HEALTH CARE

[HEALTH CARE AS A REPRESSIVE TOOL]


BOOK 5-1


THE UROLOGICAL DRAMA. PART 1.


CONTENT

Chapter 1.

Chapter 2.

Chapter 3.

__________


* * *


The whole text of the chronological events and medical documents (under the name of "The Punitive Health Care - (Health Care as a Repressive Tool)" is available for examination only on the basis of the following contract between the author and the reader:


I (THE READER) GIVE MY CONSENT THAT, BY CLICKING CORRESPONDING LINKS AND ACCESSING THE TEXT OF "THE PUNITIVE HEALTH CARE", I AUTOMATICALLY AGREE TO THE FOLLOWING PRELIMINARY CONDITIONS [FOR READING]:


-- I am (at least) 18 years old.


1. I (the reader) is undertaking (commit myself) not to distribute the text of "The Punitive Health Care - (Health Care as a Repressive Tool)" - entirely, or in fragments; not to copy medical documents; and not to share the text and images without author' permission.


2. I (the reader) understand that the confidential information, which is contained in this text, cannot be used for any other [than the reading (extraneous; secondary)] purposes and needs, for any researches, essays, stories, etc.


3. I (the reader) commit myself not to sneer at open ticklish personal information (which sharing was induced by circumstances), not to savor any medical, physiological, or anatomic details, and not to use this text as a reason for mockery and persecution.


4. I (the reader) am warned by the author that, except for a number of obviously immoral (by definition) doctors' and medical staff's actions, other decisions and acts described in this "confession" are not subjected to hasty moral assessment because a) only experts can judge finally about their justification and fairness; b) explanations and vindications of other party are necessary. We also do not know to what degree the doctors were under an influence and direct power of police, Ministry of Immigration, and other enforcement agencies, political organizations, groups and persons - with their own ideological, economic, and propaganda interests, - and to what degree this influence impacted on their diagnostic conclusions and assessments of patient's state of health. Many of the documentary confirmed facts incontestably demonstrate that author's ideological stand (who's opposing to younger generation's transformation into zombie-biorobots with mobile phones on shoulders instead of heads; to electronic totalitarianism with its prison-like total video surveillance; and to the tyrannical political censorship) played nearly a major role in enraging the authorities and triggering the persecutions.


5. I (the reader) am warned that the author sees the main cause of the most dramatic (for him) events in the fact that the enforcement agencies and interested persons and groups managed to present him to the medical community as an individual incapable to evaluate his health condition objectively; as a health-consciousan (or hypochondriac); an extremist; a troublemaker; an individual obsessed with panic and alarm patterns; as a person, who is making unreal demands to the system of medical care - concerning his - allegedly - pseudo-maladies and exaggerated gravity of trivial indispositions. This smear campaign of defamation, scurrilous libel, and wicked calumny made impossible receiving an adequate medical care (and sometimes any medical help at all), and led to health undermining, numerous diseases, incidents, and unnecessary sufferings. Doctors also considered difficult to believe in continuous (not connected with each other) illnesses, with an interval of 4-7 days, sometimes rolling at the same time: as tsunami. They refused to believe in these sequences of illnesses' painful course, danger, and significance. This chronicle disproves such a prejudiced opinion, producing an incontestable evidence.


6. I (the reader) am informed that all negative remarks, characteristics, and facts' assessments belong only to the portrayal of criminal groups, extremists, and carriers of anti-humanistic, racist, and totalitarian ideology, but do not contain groundless generalizations and negative assessment of any country, ethnic group, or religion. The author is categorically against dismantling of any of the existing states, and against restrictions of the rights of religious congregations of any faith.


7. I (the reader) am informed that this edition partially presents the previous 2017 edition without any changes, and, thus, may not correspond to later view and opinions.


8. I (the English reader) am informed that some parts of the following English text of "The Punitive Health Care" - were translated from Polish, Russian, or French originals, and may contain primitive language, double interpretation, or puzzled meaning. Such confusing fragments should be compared with their originals in Polish and Russian languages (author's native languages) [2016-2017]; all controversial points must be resolved through such a comparison.


9. In the very last moment of this edition's make-up (April 2023), the author came across a description of so-called Havana-syndrome, and found same symptoms and complications, which he experienced when was attacked by an unknown remote weapon (3 Nov. 2005, 7 Jan. 2013, and 21 June 2016), and developed symptoms of post-microwave irradiation.


_________


CHAPTER 1.


In the previous books, I already described how Canadian Immigration authorities have forged a falsified tubercular fluorography, which they used for torpedoing our immigration procedure, and, possibly, planned to infect me by tuberculosis trying forcibly placing me into an infectious diseases unit.


I already described how they ignored an alternative X-Ray and a letter form a professor-pulmonologist, and what illegal and internationally-condemned methods-tricks they used for their goals.


They blocked an access to this forged fluorography to my lawyers, doctors, and me, making not possible to contest the forgery. However, when this affair got to the attention of wide public, when I addressed to UN Human Rights Commissioner, all claims of Immigration officials were dropt, and my "tuberculosis" file was "forgotten".


And, still, I wished to see that scandalous fluorography and its report, and to see - who did the report. Through my lawyers, I again demanded a copy of this fluorography, and again was denied.


So, I decided to visit the hospital (where the fluorography was done) and to attempt to obtain this fluorography through the general civil venues.


On December 2, 2000, I took my medical plastic RAMQ card and my Royal Victoria hospital card, and rushed to Montreal Chest Institute (MCI). I deliberately came there at the end of the working day, when medical chiefs (as I suggested), supposedly, left. Having shown the documents and having run on compassionate and sincere nurses, I explained that on November 1, 2000, I passed a fluorography, and asked for a copy of the conclusive medical report, and also expressed a desire to see the original of the film and to make a copy. My request was transferred to a female doctor, who went to find my medical records, and I went upstairs after her. But, when we reached one of the floors, she, entering into a door, accessible only for the medical personnel, told me to go to another (opposite) stairs, and to wait there on the same level (between two floors).


She warned me that it might take long.


Earlier, downstairs, I managed to glance in MCI hospital"s archive, where did not find anything: not just radiologist"s conclusive report, but even a record that on November 1, 2000, I passed the fluorography. Archive"s employees told me that - even if I did this X-Ray for Immigration - the entry of this record should be stored in the computer and be registered anyway. They asked if I am not "confusing something", or, they said, there is something very, very weird.


In my personal notes, I specified that I learned "in confidence" from an immigrant woman, the cleaner, who used to have problems with Immigration herself, about "room number 28". So was told in a short written retelling, and the wider description got lost somewhere on uncountable DVDs. Now - 17 years later - I do not remember, was the number "28" assigned to archive"s door - or to another room. But - before I managed to come closer to "room 28" - a short blonde man jumped out - as devil from a snuffbox, - and snatched on me. (How could he react so quickly? Who managed to warn him for only a few seconds - while I went down from the 1st to ground floor?)


- You will receive nothing here, fuck you! And you will be punished for your refusal to see the tubercular doctor. - He cried out this all into my face with an undisguised rage.

- I was told that my fluorography - both the film image and the conclusive report - are missing.


He not simply turned pale, and became white, as chalk: so clearly he got a fright - as though just lost one million dollars, and began shaking. He disappeared into an imperceptible gray door (under the same color as the wall), which was opening right to the staircase between the floors - and immediately jumped out from there with a big paper package (my name and my photo on it), and with all signs of deep relaxation.


- Here it is! You should go to the doctor because you have tuberculosis.

- Are you sure of it?

- Yes, I am absolutely sure.

- I was told that my case is closed - and I should not go anywhere.

- Nobody could tell to you such a bluff. You will be sentenced for non-obedience.

- Civil doctors' opinion on this x-ray image: it must be a mistake, or a fake, Sir, or a film had a technical defect. Look - and let me to take a look.

- It is possible. But under the law - you should go to the doctor in any case even if it is a mistake.

- Under what law? What law, what paragraph? Besides - I have the right to choose another medical institution, not yours, and go where I choose to pass a fluorography, or to pay a visit to another doctor, not yours.


(The conversation was going sometimes in French, sometimes in English, and I literally said "to pay such a visit", but this devil used the word-play "to pay a visit" - extracting simply "to pay", and rushed on me with real cries and with new force).


- You don"t want to pay, huh?! You do not want to give donations to hospital"s cash desk? You came to Canada - and want to enjoy our good life - giving nothing in exchange? If you do not pay the fucking money, you will pay by your fucking ass... bum!


Only much later I realized that he was able (and skillful in it) to use such a lexicon and such phraseological / phonetic constructions, which, being a pseudo-slang, would be perceived as a slang, and - at the same time - would be understandable to such a fresh immigrant as myself.


Among the threats (which whole stream had splashed out on me from this medium-sized person), he promised me future problems with accessing medical care in Canada, and also with receiving medications and the referrals for diagnostic procedures and tests. I, naturally, left at once, but still heard a phrase thrown to my back "as such a notorious ideological enemy, you are already treated too well" (and, again, he used a word-play: "treated too well" - where the word "treated" had triple meaning: healed, treated, and threatened); and "don"t be surprised, if you will catch tripper".


All 20 years I, re-reading my own report on that ugly incident, did not pay attention to the form of the name of this venereal illness used by this hideous doctor. And just now it dawned upon me that, raised in Canada (apparently) the doctor used that version (which got to Russian from German lexicon) that has an especially insulting character for a Russian-speaking person. No Canadian doctor will ever employ the term "tripper" instead of "gonorrhea". It means, that this "devil" from this MCI hospital perfectly knew, what dirty and humiliating implication in the colloquial culture of Russian-speaking people associates with this word.


It is certainly not a coincident that exactly in the same period of time (2-nd half of 2000) I was targeted by an unusually aggressive and illegally persuasive campaign of money extortion. Demanding to donate money, hospitals sent me hundreds of letters, which used to arrive every day by post; doctors' secretaries and other medical personnel members handed over to me application forms on donations or other similar papers every time when I visited medical institutions; I was targeted by "donations" extortion via phone calls every 2 hours. No doubt that it was a well-coordinated (and perhaps supervised by the enforcement agencies) campaign. I would be glad to participate in the charity program if I had what to donate, but, unfortunately, from 1994 to 2000, we gave out everything (that we had, earned, or received) for Immigration procedures and immigration lawyers. We lived in the situation of miserable poverty (partially - because of that). In this period, the most aggressively demanding money donations was the Royal Victoria Hospital (RVH), and, thus, it was, probably, not a coincident that Immigration sent me for the mandatory fluorography to MCI, which is part of RVH, and made a plot around this fake tuberculosis diagnosis together with this particular institution.


See below: one of such money extortion letter from Royal Victoria Hospital:


This incident at MCI also has a special significance, because years later, in 2013-2016, another spiteful doctor, Dr. Brian Morris (a urologist), stated economic claims to me almost in the same words, and, the most important, with the same intonations, emotions and hints. Accusing me of, allegedly, doing "too many" tests, and refusing me referrals-requisitions for blood and urine tests, this doctor shouted that supposedly each test costs so much and so much, and that I "rob" the Canadian state for these and these sums. During 25 years in Canada, I never heard that a medical doctor should tell his patient without private insurance that his patient is a "robber" because he"s using Canadian universal Medicare, or because he"s doing "too many" tests (we know that the MD-s are ordering lab tests - not patients, - and they do not administrate tests without a reason). An only possible explanation is that Dr. Morris did not tolerate and did not recognize my Canadian citizenship, and even my presence in this country, because even people, who do not have Canadian citizenship, even prisoners (criminals) - have the right for medical care. I have no idea what connection had Dr. Morris to my Immigration file, but this line goes directly to my Immigration case and its particular details, which Dr. Morris was familiar with, for sure. Denying me the most basic and the most inexpensive tests (and other medical procedures) under the pretext of their cost, he was politically-motivated, and - sabotaging the exams to track down the infection and bleeding, - he deliberately provoked a chronic infection, formation of stones, and other catastrophic consequences that led to 2 serious surgeries and to a sharp blow to my health.


It is certainly not a coincident that, using a sophisticated guileful language, the Federal judge and Immigration officials actually outlined that the state, which took us from Warsaw to the Middle East by force, did it for its own cost, and, thereby, we are not qualify for the status of political refugees. (If so, it justifies all hostages-taking terrorists!).


There is an obvious connection between politically-motivated persecutions - triggered by the Canadian Federal Immigration - and persecutions by some doctors: which incontestably proves that I was mistreated in medical institutions initially due to the same sequence of events generated by Immigration on behalf of a wrong political and economic doctrine-model, and that the oppressive methods were applied to me in connection with the hegemony of an anti-humanistic, anti-pluralistic and racist ideology, promoted by a foreign theocratic state, and supported by an influential "untouchable" "minority", which plays a pivotal role in imposing that model and enforcing it within the global financial elite.


In my refugee-claim documents, I provided a description of the foreign totalitarian tactics of suppressing dissidents and marginalized minorities by the medical terrorism methods. Unfortunately (as came out later), the Canadian puppet state and its British puppeteers already planned by then to destroy universal Canadian public healthcare, to introduce total privatization, and to develop an ugly system of mass murders of so-called "social ballast" extermination through medical means.


Since this incident in MCI (end of 2000), a number of doctors and some serious medical institutions committed crimes against my life and my health, which opened an additional source of hostility and injustice towards me, their victim. Then, the cover-up rules started to enter the game. There is a group of medical workers that conduct a smear campaign against me (amongst other doctors), in term to connect more medics to this campaign. I also know that the honest doctors (true to their Hippocratic Oath) were threatened: that, if they continue to help me, they too will undergo persecution.


Undoubtedly, English medical institutions (hospitals, affiliated with McGill University, etc.) began first to subject me to persecution, as the MCI hospital (part of RVH), the center of our conflict with the medical department of Immigration, and the Jewish Hospital of Montreal: are medical institutions of McGill university network. Special comprehension of MCI"s unknown doctor, who mentioned the venereal diseases in the context of the evolved conflict's (concerning the forged diagnosis "tuberculosis") "expansion", his awareness concerning the term "tripper" - instead of "gonorrhea" (i.e. he knew what dirty and humiliating implication in colloquial culture of Russian-speaking people associates with this word), a forged bill (sent to me by a private lab), which demanded to pay for venereal diseases blood test (i.e. the test, which I never did: see in 1-st 2 books of this series), and the threats of immigration officials to infect me with an urological infection or a venereal disease: all this specifies that it was not an improvisation and not a casual threat, but some well thought over and developed in advance plan.


Therefore, it is easy to assume that the Federal Canadian Immigration"s officials, obedient to those who stood behind them and subject to them doctors of Immigration Medical Services (IMS) - not simply threatened to infect me with a "shameful" illness, but really had a concrete plan.


The most probable is that intimidation, stressful situation and threats were the means to provoke a "promised" urological infection with the help of well-developed (by security and intelligence services, since the beginning of the XX century) suggestive technique, in combination of simultaneous weakening victim"s immune system by means of terror.


I managed to "smuggle" 2 patient's records (hospital and polyclinic "dossier") from USSR - my own and my deceased brother. These volumes ("зшiткi" in Belorussian) in a semi-page format, with the combined results of the medical tests glued in them twice-three times, and the exams, have vanished from my present apartment much later, approximately in 2007-2009. But, if they were withdrawn by then finally and irrevocably, it can mean that someone knew about their existence back in 1999. Not casually I did not find them from 1999 to 2005, and, consequently, could not scan them in time. It is possible that they have been vanished, and then reappeared. When they suddenly "reappeared", I scanned them at once, but later the whole archive of these files on my hard disk and on DVDs, and patient's records themselves - "evaporated". I did not manage to "decode" these medical records, and to transfer them later to a digital format. Potentially, in unfriendly hands, medical information, which they contained, could pose a real danger for me.


For example, 2 summers in a row, in 1971-1972 (9-th and 10-th grade at school) I suffered bilateral pneumonia, and also intoxicative pyelonephritis. In both cases I survived, and stayed alive literally by miracle, and in both cases the illness burst just at once after the court hearings arranged by KGB directly at my school number 5 of the city of Bobruisk - where I studied.


Charges of "anti-Soviet propaganda" thrown by schoolmates; "testimonies" (false, of course) of schoolmates, or fake stories about my alleged "statements"; representatives of KGB gave speeches; my father was invited "for conversation" into UKGB building on Pushkinskaya Street: all this shows the seriousness of the situation and danger that threatened me. It is possible that the information on pyelonephritis and pneumonia have predetermined both the threats by a urological infection, and the diversion with the forged diagnosis "tuberculosis" here, in Canada.


It was obvious that an extreme stressful situation brought down my immune system in 1970-s, and that even if people from KGB "helped" me to fall sick (pneumonia and pyelonephritis [it was told in the reference from the hospital: "intoxicative pyelonephritis", and - through 2 lines - "endointoxication": whether there is no hint in this contradiction?]) - my body could overcome this "help", but did not succeed because of the failure of immune system caused by stress. If any malicious genius was going to simulate a similar situation, expecting to repeat what happened by then, these 2 directions - pulmonary and urological - should have promised to be the most resultative. Theoretically, by the same logic, it was possible to expect that the news about "tubercular" fluorography will provoke a real pulmonary disease. In a different way, the purposes of false fluorography stretched much further than only to sabotage the immigration procedure.


The same mechanism could be expected to be effective via threats to "punish" me by a urological infection. The most likely, it was the so-called opportunistic infection attacking "weak places" in my organism, when (in 1970 and 1971) my immune system was weakened by the KGB campaign, and this has provoked the pyelonephritis. [The so-called opportunistic infections are infections caused by microorganisms which live normally in any healthy individual, but deadly dangerous when they get into a "non-habitual" place.]


This attack on my health could rely not only on suggestive and stress-modeling technique of influence, but also on the fluorography with an apparently elevated radiation; because after this mandatory Immigration"s fluorography - all of a sudden - changes in the blood count formula (deviations from norm) appeared. Even a small excess of radiation during this fluorography could lead to an irreversible damage of hematopoietic organs, and to a sharp decrease of auto-immunity (i.e. a decrease of host organism"s fight against microorganisms living inside it whereas "external" bacteria could still receive an effective immune repulse). "Opportunistic" infections are the infections caused (under certain conditions) by microorganisms living in an absolutely healthy person as normal environmental flora, or when they get "not where they belong", provoking serious infectious diseases. For example, streptococci, enterococci, and other microorganisms of the same row, live in human gastro-enteric tract, without causing any harm, but, if they migrate into the urogenital system: they cause a dangerous chronic infection. This happens more often in the conditions of immune failure. Besides, there are some individuals, who react to a stressful situation by actively eating (intuitively, for stress removal) unusual for them spicy and salty food, and, in these cases, the chance of a urological infection is several times higher. If an attempt to provoke a urological infection by means of suggestive, diversionary and provocative technique did not work, the attempt can be repeated by employing an infectious material object, or an agent with an active venerologic disease, who, "by chance", is becoming a future sexual partner of the victim.


It is very important to stress that a number of urologic-venereal infections (including gonorrhea) can be contracted not from live contacts with people, but from contaminated objects, like towels, toilet paper, soap, condoms, underwear, etc.


The use of medicine, doctors, laboratories and medical institutions to destroy ideological or political opponents is more and more widely spreading in the modern world, exactly like it been practiced by Hitler and Stalin. In Canada, as well as everywhere, some politicians, the protégés of the global political reaction, put the opponents out of their way by the methods well perfected by Zionists.


[In Russian original, there is a list of sample cases, omitted here.]


Anything cannot be more eloquent than the fact that the beginning of criminal manipulations with my medical data, and the initial actions for the purpose of blasting my health, were carried out by the Federal Immigration: one of the Canadian enforcement agencies; same, as police, gendarmerie and intelligence services. Doctor Wanda Brzezinska - a doctor "accredited" in Immigration, actually, also was a member of the Immigration department. Methodically and persistently, she was extorting from me the history of my health problems of the Soviet period, having promised and even having sworn that anything from my "before-Montreal" past will not be reported to the authorities. And, trusting her promises, I told her about an acute pyelonephritis in 1972 when I had a conflict with KGB (which may give someone ground for reflections and additional insinuations).


In 1972, the head of the nephrology unit in Bobruisk central hospital, Dr. Rayev, diagnosed "autoimmune intoxication" (poisoning), which complication led to pyelonephritis. For ethical reasons limiting this description to exclusively my personal history, I am compelled to hold back other events. So, I conceal about a "discovery" made by Dr. Tereza Brzezinska in 1998, and then in 2001, which also could give someone subject for insinuations.


Doctor Brzezinska - a very qualified professional - could become a valuable source for enforcement agencies (like Immigration) and foreign intelligence services, if they were evaluating all main vulnerabilities of my psychology and physiology for any provocation, like an accident, or a blow to my health.


The rumors that madam Brzezinska was a relative of the former US Secretary of State Zbignew Brzezinski; her own pro-American (and, if so, probably, pro-Zionist) political orientation; the fact that her son - a political journalist (perhaps, a Russophobe) and a supporter of American "hawks" - went to Moscow and wrote a number of unfriendly to Russia articles for Canadian English newspapers: all this increases the chances of such a probability.


Immigration officials knew very well the history of persecutions, which ruined my life in USSR, at least from my refugee file. I also drew a conclusion (from conversations with them) that they were well informed on the contents of my publications, and, in particular, about my publications on Internet. My diary records (the memoirs), my special autobiography "Witness" (The Witness), my diary novels (and, in particular, the "Clockwork Doll") could give them a false impression that not only pyelonephritis could leave problems in me in this particular sphere, and now a smallest push can make them be "active again". But, being non-fiction writers of dirty affairs far from the literary craft, they did not consider that my hero and I - are not identical personalities, and that even my novels based on my personal diaries, contain a Lion"s share of literary fiction. They might be described very truthfully, and, still, based not on my personal experience, but on fictional events, or on what used to happen with my close friends.


Since the beginning of the 20-th century, the cooperation between repressive organs of different countries (persecuting dissidents) constantly gets stronger and wider. Only unaware people are thinking that, say, the Soviet dissidents or opponents of another antidemocratic regime, competitor of USA, having found refuge in the West, are becoming "alive and safe" there. Actually, the honest, sincere dissidents (not mercantile careerists, not political speculators) instantly become objects of surveillance while their dossiers in the foreign oppressive agencies soon migrate from the country of their origin or former residence to local intelligence services, in which archives disappear the "object"s" personal file with all the information, including, for example, that, years ago, KGB or Stasi tried to infect the "object" by gonorrhea, streptococcus, staphylococci, or enterococci. So, the intelligence services learn that what is needed is just to reanimate a disease.


From conversations with immigration officials (who - like police officers - interrogated me "with addiction") I received an impression that the whole folder of my file in Soviet KGB, perhaps, "moved" from former Soviet KGB to "a new location" in Canadian enforcement agencies (together, with, possibly, polyclinic and hospital medical records from USSR). After disintegration of USSR, and KGB disbandment, by 1999-2000 almost all databases of KGB migrated to secret services" archives of USA and Israel. And, if some extremists in KGB, since the beginning of 1980-s been already supervised by the extremists in the intelligence elite of Israel, tried to use the same suggestive and stress-based methods against me, the extremists from their supervisors" circles had just to resettle these KGB methods to the local soil.


Theoretically, a number of urogenital infections, including gram-positive bacterium of Neisseria Gonorrhea, can be spread not through sexual contacts. After all, unlike some others - sexually transmitted infections - it is possible to infect someone with a gonococci bacterium "artificially", which means: not only "through a shared bed", but also via domestic way, by a contact with contaminated things. Let doctors assure us that the probability of such an infection is small: from 1 to 10 %, but, first, it exists, and, secondly, by some special strains the probability of the transmission through a household objects increased to 70 %.


But this is - in principle - not at all about any special "cunning" strains. Clinging to these 1-10 % of probability to be infected by the gonococci through the domestic appliances, doctors completely exclude even a slightest possibility of a deliberate infecting.


However, isn"t such an infection "begins" from the mucous membranes? And, meanwhile, a dissemination of this bacterium to the mucous membrane of an eye - a simplest and effective way of "artificial" infection. Repeatedly I heard from experts about possibility of infection by the gonococci-infected creams, ointments, through some liquids for mouth rinsing, liquid soap, infected condoms (in a wet environment, this bacterium is capable perfectly survive), etc. (Damages - even smallest - of the mucous membranes: an additional gate for an infection). It is enough to keep the bacterial culture of gonococcus in the moist environment, and to transfer it to the moist environment of human body.


So, threatening me to infect me by gonorrhea, immigration officials and immigration doctors were perfectly aware by the secret services' methods and the efficiency of those methods.


The Neisseria Gonorrhoeae is just an example, because (what was proven later) - in my case - I got an opportunistic infection of entherococci, a microorganism that - by migrating from gut to urinal tract due to temporary weakened immune reaction - provokes a very dangerous infection.


In my personal case, a new outbreak of infection (an entherococci infection) 30 years after pyelonephritis in 1972, or 15-20 years after a theoretical (unknown to me) diversion of Soviet or foreign intelligence services in USSR, or asymptomatic pyelonephritis complications during the same period - was impossible without an extraneous "help". And that is why.


Since my childhood, having no addiction to spicy, bitter, or salty food, I, nevertheless, during any periods sometimes ate "for company" (with friends) pickles, marinaded tomatoes, horse-radish, radish, a house pizza with ketchup, and other similar delicacies. And, though I preferred vodka, cognac and red wine to all alcoholic beverages, sometimes 3-4 times a week, I, happened, periodically drank cold beer, combined with jamming vobla and herring. (Certainly: before I became vegetarian in 1998-1999). If there would be latent infectious cocci in my organism, it would be almost impossible to avoid manifestations of their activity during these 10 years after departure from USSR.


On the other hand, in 1999 I already completely excluded meat from my ration, having become vegetarian, almost completely refused alcohol, and declared an absolute boycott to beer. I well remember that on the eve of New Year's holidays (2000-2001), and in the first days of New Year did not eat any spicy or salty food. It means that no additional provocation of a urological infection could take place without an "assistance". As to the last, just the fact that my fluorography was forged and false diagnosis "tuberculosis" fabricated to topple the completion of the immigration procedure in my case, speaks for itself. Even if it would be an "only" criminal "mistake" - it could justify any further suspicion. However, these moral freaks have continued to cling to the diagnosis "tuberculosis" even after an alternative X-Ray (which completely disproved Immigration"s "diagnosis" as nonsense); they ignored both "civil" X-ray and the conclusions of doctors (including above mentioned professor - lung specialist). It is just a smallest step from here - to deliberately (artificially) infecting an objectionable person.


In addition, it is necessary to mention about a special culture of concealment of medical crimes. A doctor, who does not comply with an unwritten law of cover up, who refuses to hide a criminal mistake or a deliberate crime of his colleagues, will not be able to continue his medical practice.


A special danger to medics (and every medical worker knows this) represents an attempt by authorities to destroy health of an "unwanted" person; therefore, the medics will try to keep themselves by all means away from such a case as far as possible. It explains astonishing negligence of doctors to whom I came in connection with a urological infection in January, 2001. Having been well informed about the history of my immigration "tuberculosis" saga and the forged bill for an alleged blood test that I never did, and also well informed about the threats voiced (to me) by Immigration officials "to infect with gonorrhea", my attending physicians could easily compare chronologically this history and arisen behind her immediately - at once - urological problem: and to draw "interesting" conclusions. (This is how I was denied antibiotics, and, consequently, the infection has developed into a chronic disease).


Concerning the refusal of antibiotics, it must be added (for the following years) that not only blunt-bold refusals, but also cunning prescriptions of non-correct antibiotics, or prescriptions of not the right dose of Cipro and not on right terms' length (for 3, 5 or 7 days only, for fighting an acute and long-lasted infection) contributed to 14-years-long (already in 2014) UT infection, while bringing only short periods of relief and poisoning (in vain!) liver and other organs, and generating potential cellular (genetic) damage and aging acceleration.


So, it is rather not surprising that - on my demands to check up a suspected cocci infection (and, among all types of cocci, FIRST OF ALL - ENTHEROCOCCI) - ALL doctors stubbornly responded that "there is no need in it"! (Let"s compare it with the vicious search for any health abnormalities, when the enforcement department (Immigration) was after this! When bureaucrats needed a "medical compromise" to topple our immigration case, they fabricated multiple illnesses-"diagnoses", trampling on mine and my mother's human rights, and murdering my mother by these fabricated diagnoses, but, when a real infection demanded medical tests, diagnosis, and medical therapy: doctors refused everything). They did not hesitate to spend neither time, nor forces, nor their oratory art to assure me that I DO NOT HAVE an infection and BY NO MEANS CAN have it. Meanwhile, during the 1-st year of this sudden acute urological problem (2001) I submitted the following list of symptoms to almost all doctors (to whom I addressed):


Initial symptoms: dysuria; micturition; urgency; frequency; interruption; inconsistency; painful bladder, back pain, burning; itching; dermatoses, etc.


Collateral symptoms and syndromes: 1) periodically - bones & joints pain; 2) "baggies" under both eyes; 3) left side low stomach pain; 4) teary eyes; 5) sensation of impossibility to empty the bladder completely; 6) mouth's small ulcers; 7) reoccurrences are provoked by spicy, salt, etc. food & beer. 8) HLA-B27-positive, soon followed by hematuria & other bloody discharges.


Only according to this list of symptoms, it was already possible to suspect a chronic urological infection, with high probability of enterococci. I submitted the list of these symptoms in 2001-2007 to doctors like Zigmund Zast, Ivan Rohan, Daniel Faran, Robert Piche, Heather Jean Pushie, Ury Krasny, Brian Morris, and others.


I kept copies of the vast majority of faxes, which I sent to doctors both from the computer via fax modem, and from the fax-machine. Thus, I have both listings of requisites of each fax, and originals of the texts with their own requisites and print outs to requisites of listings of sending. And the fact that not less than 2 dozens of medical doctors categorically refused to consider the above-stated symptoms in a complex as a manifestation of only ONE disease (and, instead, treated them as separate, not interconnected pathologies): must have a grave NON-MEDICAL context.


Certainly, even the set of the combination of these symptoms does not "guarantee" a cocci infection (supposed - enterococci) until the tests will prove it, but the persistent and systematic refusal of ALL doctors to issue such tests on such an infection cannot be anything else but some kind of "political" taboo. It is possible to assume that at the 1-st stage such a taboo could be partially caused by filtered information from classified (restricted) databases.


After the conflict in Montreal Chest Institute (MCI) (described above) and the closure of an access to my doctors and lawyers (and to me) to phony Immigration"s fluorography (which helped to forge the false diagnosis "Tuberculosis") - I began to guess about medical databases created in late 1990-s in the state institutions, and inaccessible to "mere mortals", and used for political terror.


A bit later, a supplementary information on "undisclosed" databases emerged. Allegedly, already by then, the secret services, enforcement agencies (like Immigration), police and "foreign partners" began to establish them in Canadian medical institutions (1-st of all, in the hospitals). Such a restricted zone with classified dossiers can be one or several "sealed-up" computers; some protected by passwords and coded texts information on hard disks; or some folders in medical archives" computers and other computer databases; a safe; or a room; or part of a room separated by a lattice; a special compartment; or even the whole floor in a medical building. This is where the medical data - on dissidents, non-paid thinkers, or "non-authorized" researchers, who ignore s.c. political correctness, or whistleblowers - is stored, and where (on a pointer "from above") the withdrawn results of lab tests, ultrasounds, X-rays, etc. are flowing into.


Now, let's go back to the abdominal scene at Montreal Chest Institute's hospital, on December, 2, 2000.


Before I left the MCI hospital, I realized that the "keeper" of the false fluorography, probably, bluffed: the envelope shown by him could be empty. Neither a film, nor an X-Ray"s conclusive report was inside. Only the "birdie" mark on one of the paragraphs on the envelope: "category "4" - could give a hint. As though someone's hand made an incorrect movement - and put this sign in a wrong place... A bit later, I found out that the "category 4" means "pulmonary noodles", which is absolutely absurd in my case!


As I already mentioned above, I linked the insults and threats of that MCI doctor-"keeper" - with the aggressive extortion of donations (racketing) by Royal Victoria hospital. I was getting - at these time - hundreds of envelopes with the letters-requests to transfer large sums of money to this hospital; so numerous that sometimes they all did not fit into the mail box, and this created a problem. (I repeat the images of this the "tubercular" letter - and, enclosed in the same envelope, a letter of donations demands (see below):


We are not greedy people, and willingly would transfer a sum available to us into hospital"s account, but the sums demanded were astronomical, and everything that we had, we gave out for immigration lawyers and procedures, and, sometimes it happened that we had to borrow money to pay the rent. Especially outrageous was the fact that - a next extortion demand arrived enclosed in the same envelope: together with the "tubercular" letter on behalf of Immigration, sent to me from MCI (see above, in first 2 books of this series). The fact that - together with the letter on behalf of Immigration sent me from MCI (see above) - there arrived the next extortion enclosed in the same envelope is especially scandalous.


This link between Canadian Federal Immigration's Medical Services - and their obligational order to undergo Immigration's fluorography at Royal Victoria Hospital's Montreal Chest Institute becomes even more obvious and outraged, when taking into consideration that exactly Royal Victoria Hospital was an only hospital in Montreal, which illegally charged me for medical procedures, covered by the universal medical card (RAMQ). See the image of one of such examples below:


I was not warned that such or such procedure is payable; they did not demand any payment during my visits to this hospital, but later, in 4-6 months, sent me letters with the weird illegal bills. The sums, mentioned in these bills, were astronomical for our situation - when we were on welfare, - and varied from 250 to 900 Canadian Dollars. When I contested these bills, all charged were dropped, but the facts of such extortions, and their link to Canadian Federal Immigration is evident.


Later, because of the circumstances and events in MCI, I began to visit (in case of emergency) generally the ER at St.-Mary"s hospital. I also did the majority of lab tests there, and visited there the offices of medical specialists. It is a very good hospital, one of 3-4 best hospitals in Montreal. But only recently I casually learned about the rumors that this hospital is hosting a club of rich sponsors, donators and doctors: an informal organization of Christian and Jewish (St.-Mary"s hospital is situated just near the giant Montreal Jewish hospital) Zionists, sectarians and members of an "informal" cult. This alleged club of political and ideological reactionaries and social racists, allegedly, goes beyond the sponsors and managers of this hospital, extending its influence on the most influential medical doctors - the "pillars" of the local staff (such as Dr. Morris, Dr. Sejean, and others). Political engagement of physicians and St.-Mary"s hospital personnel defines the "selective" treatment of patients, depending on their socioeconomic status and their views.


The form for donations for RVH hospital"s enclosed in the same envelope with the false "tuberculosis accusation" (on behalf of Immigration), with an order to appear for hospitalization in the infectious diseases unit, and to pay for such a "treatment" a considerable amount of money: it is something so disgusting that there are simply no epithets and definitions in human language for it. This is an all-important fact in the light of ridiculous financial claims, which I heard from this MCI doctor, and - later - during every appointment with Dr. Morris.


I must also remind again about the financial background of the refugee status denial, when a next maxim emerged: that, allegedly, if the Middle Eastern state took us (against our will!) to its territory from Warsaw at its own expense, we belong to this state forever. I must stress here that I never left any debts behind. No non-covered loans, no open-unpaid credits. Perhaps, this is why the slave masters and war criminals at Canadian Federal Immigration argued that my debt to this theocratic and racist Middle Eastern state, in the absence of any formal-official financial debts, consists in the cost of the operation of that country's special agents, who took us by force from Warsaw's Central Station to the hotel (where they kept us like prisoners), and in the cost of our transportation from Warsaw to Middle East. Dr. Morris refused me vital tests, emphasizing that will issue the requisites only if I "go private" (i.e. if I will pass them at own expense). This most obvious connection between the enforcement officers and such doctors as Dr. Morris uncovers the political and ideological background of mistreatment by some physicians and medical institutions, within the coordinated pressure-intimidation campaign of police and medical institutions.


The documentary evidence of the most bizarre lawlessness and deprivation of rights, presented in this work, left no doubts about the severity of extrajudicial crimes against me and members of my family. Fraud, deception, scam, falsification of medical documents, brutality, cruelty, forgery, and other criminal schemes, employed by the state bureaucrats in Canada (including the medical sphere) already in 1990: is a very scary tendency. Immigration officers and connected to them criminals with MD degrees, have insisted on forged diagnosis "tuberculosis" (see events in 2000-2001) even when the "civil" doctors presented another X-Ray and conclusions that I don"t have and never had tuberculosis. Fake blood tests in my case; forged medical documents in my mother"s case: a phony medical report, allegedly issued in 1995, but, in reality, forged in 2000; a falsified echocardiogram, and other crimes against my mother: all these events were not isolated incidents, but the manifestation of the whole criminal system in the medical domain that must be demolished.


Any impartial reader will agree that fake results of medical exams and documents, attempts to justify administrative terror by false diagnoses and analyses: these are the assaults on the very foundations of responsible lucid human society, after which madness and nightmare follow inevitably.


Any impartial reader will agree that the same falsifications of medical records (tests, exams and documents), attempts to justify the administrative terror by false diagnoses and analyses, together with the threats and "promises" to infect me with one or another infectious disease - make quite reasonable an assumption that an unexpected infection - which emerged on January 1, 2001 (whether was this "round" date casual?!) - was a fulfillment of the "promises".


Any impartial reader will agree that - if immigration officials kept silence till the end of December, 2000, without giving any answer (whether the suspension of the final phase of the immigration procedure [which was torpedoed by means of the forged fluorography] was unblocked) - though they already had - in their hands - all the proofs of the absurdity of the diagnosis "tuberculosis": that this is a proof that our immigration drama has "evolved" itself into an infection without stopping!


Any impartial reader will agree that - if one of the enforcement agencies (Immigration) [as well as other state agencies like Human Resources or Tax Agency, etc.] used to send unfair and brutal decisions intentionally on birthdays and holidays - this is perfectly corresponding to the emerged on January 1, 2000 pattern. (Let's not to forget that the year 2001: it was a year of the triumph of madmen and reactionaries, who triggered the beginning of terror under the false pretext of "anti-terrorism", and an opening of era of Orwellian global dystopia).


Any impartial reader will agree that on New Year almost all doctors" offices are closed, and in the first days of the New Year an access to doctors is complicated. (Policlinics on duty did not work. Before going to Emergency, I had to remind to myself that hardly a friendly reception is awaiting me there, especially, with not a "life-threatening" problem. I catch Dr. Zast casually: he was going to leave, but cancelled his trip. What, if he did not?)


Any impartial reader will agree that the involvement of Dr. Brzezinska (who was on the phone with Dr. Zast) - the immigration doctor, who was an accomplice of Immigration"s medical scam against my mother, which destroyed her; who was well informed about my immigration case; and knew about its - irritating the "untouchable" - background: had ominous touch.


Thus, the diversion against my health (falsification of the urine test; refusal of antibiotics; and refusal to put me under supervision of a specialist-urologist after this urological infection has developed into a chronic disease), which provoked catastrophic in the long term complications, and turned into drudgeries my whole following life, was carried out by means of the 2 tricks:


1) a very probable intervention of Dr. Brzezinska, who changed Dr. Sigmund Zast"s mind, preventing him from administrating antibiotics,


and


2) forged (altered) urine test.


Consequences of this diversion (which provoked chronic infection, prostatitis and pyelonephritis (which also passed untreated), caused numerous indirect complications, numerous threads initially connected to this initial problem:


1. CYSTOSIS, WHICH CENTERS AROSE IN DIFFERENT PLACES.

2. (METABOLISM) METABOLIC DISORDER WITH the INCREASE of the FATTY FABRIC.

3. FATTY GIPOTOZ (CONNECTED WITH POINT 2).

4. CARDIOVASCULAR PROBLEMS (as well as RELATED to THEM (and to 3 EPISODES of POSSIBLE ATTACKS by a REMOTE MICROWAVE or ULTRASONIC WEAPON - SHARP HEARING LOSS).

5. NUMEROUS DERMATOLOGICAL (SKIN) PROBLEMS.

6. HYPOKALEMIA AND HIPERKALEMIA.

7. DANGER of DIABETES.

8. AN IMMEDIATE (LITERALLY RIGHT AWAY in the 2nd HALF of 2001, i.e. in HALF A YEAR AFTER the OUTBREAK of the INFECTION) EMERGENCE of ARTHRITIS.

9. KIDNEYS PROBLEMS (also ALREADY in 2001).

10. EYES" INFECTION (CONCERNING WHICH I ADDRESSED TO Dr. Zast, Dr. R., Dr. Piche, and to 10 OTHER DOCTORS, BUT NO ONE REFERRED ME TO AN OPHTALMOLOGIST). MEANWHILE, AS I CONSIDER, EYES" INFECTION'S COMPLICATIONS PLAYED THE PIVOTAL ROLE IN THE DEVELOPMENT of the CATASTROPHIC FOR MY CREATIVE ACTIVITY AND QUALITY of LIFE SERIOUS EYES DISEASES.

11. INFECTION OF THE NASOPHARYNX AND EARS WITN COMPLICATIONS, LIKE VOCAL CHORDS" INFLAMATION AND CHRONIC PROBLEMS, AND FURTHER HEARING LOSS. THESE PROBLEMS WERE IGNORED BY DOCTORS FOR DECADES, DESPITE MY UNCOUNTABLE COMPLAINTS...

12. DRAMATIC LOSS OF THE QUALITY OF LIFE DUE TO THE UROLOGICAL (and PROVOKED by THEM) PROBLEMS.


One of the most important tendencies during the number of years is that the medical terror was accompanied by innumerous everyday"s provocations; administrative pressure (sent "by mistake" payments demands; "wrong" fines; wrong charges; innumerous disconnections of our phone and Internet, despite my regular payments and non-violation of the agreement; etc.); diversions against our property and my health; sabotage of my email service and other services; regular vicious computer virus attacks, or attacks on me by complete strangers (unknown hooligans); innumerous suspicious "accidents", involving cars, bicycles, motorcycles, and so on.


Isolation and ostracism; sabotage of my web sites; blockage of readers" access to my literary, musical, and other creative works; a silent ban on my works" publications; a nasty smear campaign on Internet, which goal was to turn the readers away from my works; actual ban (de facto) for me to work in Canada; police surveillance, regular stoppings, interrogations, and intimidation; impossibility to publish and record my musical works: these are the elements of my permanent hardship, which is also bombarding my health.


The denial of antibiotics in January 2001 and in the following years has destroyed my life and led to an enormous amount of suffering, but ALL doctors (see this whole series of books for their names) have ALWAYS denied that special restrictions on antibiotics and special medical policy (which was put in place for abolishing the usage of antibiotics) exists. However, the referrals that antibiotics are actually "half-forbidden" can be found in many medical books, like the following:


["Antibiotic constraints present difficult choices for physicians and patients. The physicians must choose between the welfare of the patient and the directive of healthcare systems for restricting antibiotics prescribing. The patient expects best care, but remains often unaware of antibiotic restriction policies and is therefore not fully informed about treatment (16).


In some cases, reducing antibiotic prescribing is an easy way for health care system to reduce cost rather than to improve healthcare for patient or manage resistance".] See: Some Ethical Perspectives in the Discipline of Microbiology. Article in INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ETHICS TRAUMA & VICTIMOLOGY December 2015 [16: Garau J. Impact of antibiotic restrictions: the ethical perspective. Clin MicrobiolInfect. 2006; 12 (Suppl.5):16-24.]


I can present hundreds of similar sources and citations, so, it is abundantly clear that my well-being was sacrificed to the idol of satisfying monsters of inequality and cruelty. I believe that my socio-economic status, my bizarre immigration saga, and repressions, which I am facing because of my ideological and philosophical views, have contributed to antibiotics" denial.


I"ll return to the description of this urological drama in the following chapters.


In this brief English translation, I am not following the chronological order of my Russian original, but organizing the chapters according to the thematic (topic"s) principle.


CHAPTER 2.


Thus, it is very unlikely that latent infectious cocci were present before the 1-st January 2001.


I already explained (in 2 first books of this series) how Dr. Brzezinska, a very friendly and very professional doctor, affiliated with Immigration Canada, suddenly changed her attitude, becoming hostile and dangerous for us. She organized a number of provocations, which served immigration officials engaged into illegal tricks and methods. Dr. Brzezinska signed a backdating illegal affidavit, which played a key role in Immigration Medical Services" scam that in 2000-s actually killed my mother. She also was preparing an alleged "tuberculosis" case against me, but her manipulations have been misfired by then, and Immigration reserved to another fraud, forging a falsified fluorography report.


We had to move to another doctor with an immigration license - to Dr. Giannakis (a choice was made not accidentally - since only Greeks, Iranians and Armenians are capable to help consciously such people as me). After the termination of my immigration epic, it was risky to remain a patient of Immigration doctor - and then I began to visit doctors Ivan Rohan and Zygmund Zast.


Only in March, 2001 (too late), Doctor Zygmund Zast prescribed Novo-Triamzide - received in a drugstore on March 25, 2001. This medication was prescribed in connection with hypokalemia (law level of potassium), which I explained to Dr. Zast as a complication of a urological infection, as the infection worked like diuretic, and, once again, demanded antibiotics. But it was convenient to doctor Zast to hide behind Novo-Triamzid (this medication - at the same time - partially works as blood pressure controlling tool) - instead of getting at problem"s root. Hypokalemia (not only a suspected endocarditis) could partly explain the heartaches, too.


It is possible to tell legends about professionalism of Doctor Z'ast (Zhast). Somehow I came to him after a visit to another doctor concerning an "abscess" on the inner surface of the lip-labrum (another doctor advised to contact a dentist). Doctor Zast only glanced, and said: "Ugryzl pan sobie wargi". Then I recalled that really 2 days ago I painfully bit the lip.


During our 1-st or 2-nd meeting, Dr. Zast, even without having looked there, took an interest whether the appendix was remote. How did he learn about it without an exam? When I complained to doctor Zast about the tendon"s ligaments sprain, he, even without having ordered me to take off the footwear and socks, immediately assumed that it is not new to me, but a long-term problem, and, again, he was right.


He - prior to a course of physical therapy - explained to me (very simply and intelligibly -literally in 2 words) the main principles of ligaments" treatment and the essence of the procedures, and promised - on condition of persistent approach - a complete remission. And, really, thank to him and Royal Victoria hospital"s physiotherapists, I cured the heels" ligaments for 100 percent, and had an opportunity to walk on 15 km, to run, and learned to ride a bicycle and run on roller skates.


Then what did not allow such an amazing medical specialists as top-class doctors Zygmund Zast and I. R. to help me to get rid of the urological infection, which materialized on January 1, 2001, and destroyed my life?


What did not allow them to stop the progress of cardiovascular, endocrinological, dermatological, urological problems and the development of arthritis?


Why, having in my person such a patient, who would execute any instructions, would follow any diet and recommendations, would take any medicine and vitamins if only to get rid of sores, they and other very good specialists did not save me from long-term torture?


Till 2001, I was mainly a healthy person!


I understand it as a cause of someone's skillful and thin countersteering to doctors" and my own efforts, in term to deny me medical help by ideological reasons and by employing criminal manipulations (including manipulations with the lab tests), indirect or direct pressure upon doctors and other medical officers, and upon medical institutions, up to direct prohibition to administrate some particular tests and procedures, and to prescribe some very particular courses of treatment.


On the other hand, my very modest "investigative" abilities, lack of access to more fundamental information, and also real complexity and tangled multilayered character of this problem, do not suggest that I may evaluate objectively a level of the positive or negative role of any given doctor in the history of my medical epic, and, so, not only a notorious provoker and frank executioner, but also someone from the other doctors figuring in my chronicle could be the provoker and executioner, who was consciously undermining (or / and affecting) my health and working directly for this goal.


But also someone from apparent ill-wishers could only pretend to be a foe (to lull into a false sense the apparatus agents), but actually helped me.


The facts and documents presented by me in this accusatory investigation can confirm also one, and another. From here: whole mountains of misinformation, concealment of important facts and data, insincere announcements, etc. For example, doctor Zast justified his refusal to renew the blood pressure controlling medication under a false pretext that, allegedly, he is not allowed to renew a prescription from another doctor because he works in a walk-in clinic. But literally in few months another doctor from another walk-in clinic has renewed this medication, and even suggested to replace it. He wanted to prescribe another type of blood pressure controlling pills because he thought that plain diuretics could give in the long term less side effects, but I refused, knowing that, in case of suspicion on gout and other problems, I rather do not need them.


On January 1, 2001, unexpectedly (with a special phenomenon of suddenness) an acute urological infection emerged.


The infection began with a "convex" strip of reddening, with burning and itching. In the next few days: dysuria, micturition, urgency, gripes and burning in the urinary bladder, kidney pain, etc.


Probable causes can be just few: 1) an opportunistic infection, due to the stressful situation, provoked by the ordeal with the fake fluorography (see above), an "excessive" radiation level during this, organized by an enforcement agency, fluorography, etc.; Immigration provocations, and threats, vocalized by immigration officials and the MCI doctor (the suggestive and psychological method, employed by enforcement agencies); 2) infection - provoked by something that got through food or air (spray, suspension, etc.?); 3) infection through home objects; 4) 2 chest X-rays in November, 2000, deliberately staged by Immigration, which have weakened the immune system.


I do not remember how it happened that I could not go to Dr. Ivan Rohan: whether I officially became his patient only in the 2-nd half of January, 2001; whether the doctor was absent for the period of Christmas - New Year's vacation; whether essentially I did not want to visit doctors, who saved me from fabricated by Immigration "tuberculosis" affair and from the infectious diseases unit [they already did too much for me; or, maybe, because they knew too much about my immigration saga].


In the first days of January 2001, Dr. Zygmund Zast was not in his walk-in clinic on Van Horn (where he was seeing his patients); then I turned to the Emergency department of Royal Victoria hospital. They prescribed a medication, as they told - contre l'infection urinal générale (against a general urological infection, Fr.). (Then it turned out that it was not an antibiotic).


The Royal Victoria Hospital"s Emergency referred me to urologist, Dr. Lapinat, from the same hospital (to whom they arranged an appointment for me in 2 weeks). However, when I came at the appointed date and time, no Dr. Lapinat was found in Royal Victoria hospital. I tried to clarify in the emergency department to what doctor I was sent after all, and where he works, but no records about my alleged visit were found. Later I tried to shed light on it in the medical archive, but there also no documents on my visit to Emergency in January (2001) existed. My attempts to clarify whether doctor Lapinat exists at all and in what hospital or policlinic he works - were not crowned with any success, too.


Without having received antibiotics in the Emergency, I went at first to a downtown walk-in clinic, and few days later to another walk-in clinic, to see Dr. Zygmund Zast. The "litmus" paper showed an infection in one doctor"s office and in another doctor"s office. Whether it is strange that both doctors refused antibiotics (as it required by protocols, instructions, and according to common practice)?


Doctor Zygmund Zast - with whom I could communicate (as well as with Dr. Wanda Brzezinska) in Polish (that was a huge benefit) - has administrated a urine test with microbiology, but the microbiology "revealed nothing". It was strange doubly. In its résumé it was mentioned that the test has failed due to the traces of antibiotics that were present in the sample. But I did not receive an access to any antibiotics and was not taking them, so, such a report was not true, and, therefore, not authentic. Besides, 1 or 2 pages of this blood-urine analysis were just missing (disappeared).


Next urine test (done in March, 2001) has disappeared entirely.


I have no idea why the doctor from the walk-in clinic near Metro Atwater did not prescribe antibiotics, and I will not waste time to build any assumptions.


As for Dr. Zygmund Zast, I have some guesses. I think that it is possible to reconstruct the mechanism by means of which doctor Zhast was forced to refuse antibiotics. The fact is that when the hidden role of Dr. Wanda Brzezinska within the framework of my mother"s persecution by the medical department of Immigration was clarified, I ceased to visit her, and during a short period had no family doctor at all.


Dr. Brzezinska prescribed first Normalol - to control the blood pressure, then Coversil. Then she changed it to Atenolol (I think, on her own initiative), which gave very disturbing side effects. I asked her to replace it for a medication with another type of action, but she steadily refused. Soon (shortly after I ceased to visit Dr. Brzezinska) the pharmacists have stopped to give out to me the blood pressure controlling pills. Apparently, it Dr. Brzezinska "stopped" them. Then I asked Dr. Zhast "to re-prescribe" (to renew) Atenolol. He measured my blood pressure: it was normal by then. He said that he "has no rights" (he said in Polish "nie mam prawa") to prescribe a medication for hypertension if the blood pressure is normal; I objected to that that it is not about a new prescription, but only about the renewal of an already prescribed medication. Then he advised to address to doctor Brzezinska. I had to tell the whole story: that Dr. Brzezinska "conspired" with the Immigration department, delivering incorrect information on my mother"s state of health, and, besides, did not wish to replace Atenolol, which provoked the annoying side effects.


See below: Atenolol prescribed by doctor Brzezinska. By my mother"s hand (at one time she was signing her own and my medications) it was specified the received and the expiration dates.


It came to light later that doctor Zast called up Dr. Brzezinska (with whom he could communicate, as well as I, in our mother tongue [in Polish]), and discussed me with her. He, allegedly, told her that I supposedly complained about the intake of Atenolol when there was absolutely no need in it. How there arose an absolutely perverse understanding of my words and why Dr. Zast needed to call up to Dr. Brzezinska - it is only possible to guess, but during their telephone conversation she, allegedly, told him about of my alleged "hypochondria" and "suspiciousness", and advised him "not to take in all good faith" "all" my complaints and descriptions of symptoms.


There are concrete clues on the fact that - during my visit (when I left his office for the toilet to collect a sample) Dr. Zast managed to call Dr. Brzezinska, my former permanent attending physician, and she "recommended" him "not to be added" and not to prescribe antibiotics to a patient who supposedly will complain later that he was taking antibiotics "without any need". It is worth to remember that doctor Brzezinska not only supposedly a relative of former US State Secretary, Zbignew Brzezinski (her long-term female patient with whom I communicated in the waiting room of this Westmount Clinic told me about it), but also that her son, a political journalist and observer, during this period wrote articles by very reactionary orders and for very reactionary English Canadian newspapers, that he went to Moscow more than once, and sent materials withstood in the spirit of Russophobe American-Israeli propaganda from there.


Both he and Dr. Brzezinska - knew about my criticism of the "untouchable" state, and about my views of the world. Besides, Dr. Brzezinska, the immigration doctor, was aware of my immigration case, and knew about its - irritating the "untouchable" state - background.


Thus, the diversions against my health (refusal of antibiotics and refusal of a referral to a urologist after an acute urological infection, which turned chronic), provoked disastrous complications in the long term, and turned all my subsequent life into a nightmare, was executed by means of 2 tricks: 1) very probable interference of Dr. Brzezinska who influenced doctor Zygmund Zast, and 2) the altered and sabotaged urine test.


Effects of this terrorist act, which provoked persistent infection, prostatitis and pyelonephritis (which also were not treated by doctors and which I survived on my feet), have triggered innumerous indirect complications connected to this problem by numerous threads:


1. CYSTOSIS, WHICH CENTERS AROSE IN DIFFERENT PLACES.

2. DISBOLISM (METABOLISM) WITH THE INCREASE OF THE FATTY TISSUE.

3. THE FAT GIPOTOZ (CONNECTED TO PARAGRAPH 2).

4. CORDIAL AND VASCULAR PROBLEMS, AND EVERYTHING RELATED TO THEM, AS WELL AS TO 2 EPISODES OF POSSIBLE USAGE OF A REMOTE MICROWAVE OR ULTRASONIC WEAPON AGAINST ME - HEARING LOSS. [The 1-st version of this chronicle was finished prior to the 3-rd attack.]

5. NUMEROUS DERMATOLOGICAL (SKIN) PROBLEMS.

6. HYPERKALEMY and GYPOKALEMY.

7. DANGER of DIABETES.

8. IMMEDIATE ARTHRITIS (LITERALLY HALF A YEAR AFTER THE BEGINNIG OF ACUTE UTI), WHICH I NEVER HAD BEFORE.

9. KIDNEYS DAMAGE.

10. EYES" INFECTION (CONCERNING CONNECTION BETWEEN UTI AND TEARY-INFECTED EYES I TURNED TO DR. ZHAST, DR. ROHAN, AND, AT LEAST, TO MORE THAN 10 OTHER DOCTORS, BUT ANY OF THEM DID NOT REFER ME TO AN OPHTHALMOLOGIST, OR TO UROLOGIST, AS WELL AS DENIED ANY COONECTION TO UTI. MEANWHILE, THE ACADEMIC LITERATURE DESCRIBE THE MANIFESTING EYE SYMPTOMS AS RELATED TO CHRONIC UTI. FURTHER, THE INFECTIOUS DAMAGE OF EYES PLAYED AN IMPORTANT ROLE IN DISASTROUS EYES DAMAGING DEVELOPMENTS, TRAGIC FOR MY CREATIVE ACTIVITIES AND THE QUALITY OF LIFE IN GENERAL).

11. THE INFECTION OF THE NASOPHARYNX AND EARS as a result of WHICH PROBLEMS of PHONATORY BANDS AND HEARING DEVELOPED AND AMPLIFIED. THESE PROBLEMS were IGNORED further DECADES, DESPITE my UNCOUNTABLE ADDRESSES TO DOCTORS of IH software to the OCCASION...

12. The DECLINE IN QUALITY of LIFE ACCRUING DUE TO the RISE of UROLOGICAL PROBLEMS.... and many other problems...


I don"t believe that other doctors have experienced a substantial pressure when refused antibiotics, or did not face any pressure at all. Rather, they denied me antibiotics just because they learned that Dr. Zast did so. Naively shown them the urine test"s copy with a statement that, allegedly, the traces of antibiotics were found in the sample and have destroyed a possibility to detect a microbiological culture, and explaining to them that - by then - I did not take and could not take any antibiotics (I did not have them!), I was counting on their conscience. I could not believe and did not want to believe that Canada is very much like the former Soviet Union, and deception and double standards have corrupted her society equally deeply, just in a hidden and sophisticated way.


Concerning Dr. Rohan and Dr. Zast, I believe that they are very ethical people, but they were probably under a direct ban (on antibiotics for me) issued by the medical authorities, and they knew that, if even I"ll obtain a prescription, a pharmacy would refuse me the medication anyway. [Later such events occurred 3 or 4 times on my memory.] An only chance to prescribe antibiotics for me Dr. Zast had in January, 2001, but he was under the influence of Dr. Brzezinska, and committed a fatal error. He preferred to trust another medical doctor with high reputation, his colleague, not his patient, ignoring the fact that Dr. Brzezinska may have personal interests. Dr. Zast was raised in communist Poland, and the pathologisation of dissent in the Soviet-bloc countries was as manifested as in Canada.


Now, for the sake of objectivity (and for clearing up the truth) - it is necessary to place all points over "i", having accurately designated a contradictory role of Wanda Brzezinska in mine and my mother's destiny. The fact is that from 1994 to 1999 Dr. Brzezinska was our permanent attending physician (family doctor), and - in this role - made for us much good. She not only sent us to almost all exams and tests requested by us, for consultations and procedures, but also made reports - "cards", favorable for us, for Immigration and other authorities, wrote out any necessary affidavits, was kindly favorably disposed to us - and all this, in my opinion, from her side (as well as from ours) was caused by sincere sympathy.


An example of consultation to which Dr. Brzezinska referred. Approximately, to the middle of 1999, there were no problems with Lady Wanda. (See above)


My mother and me: we could not recall even a single episode that could destroy our good relationship with Dr. Brzezinska (who was not a vicious woman at all) on personal level, so, consequently, her sharp alienation was more likely caused by political or ideological reasons, or, even more likely, by a direct pressure from Immigration authorities. An only fact, which did not fit into this picture, was her false report (about my mother"s health) to Immigration. This unethical and untrue denunciation suggested that all 5 years she just pretended to be friendly, but actually worked to destroy our lives. However, when I started to study all the documents issued by Immigration Medical Services, it became clear that Dr. Brzezinska"s alleged rapport was in reality forged in 2000, and was just backdated by "1994". As soon as I learned this, everything fell into place.


When I asked Dr. Zast to renew the blood pressure controlling pills for the first time, he refused under the pretext that, allegedly, my blood pressure is "in norm". (But, after measuring it, he refused to name the exact indicators). I argued that I do not ask to prescribe a new drug, but only to renew an old prescription.


Next time, when my blood pressure was 150 x 90, he refused me the blood pressure medication renewal under another ridiculous excuse: that, allegedly, he has no right to prescribe it because he works in a walk-in clinic.


However, another doctor, who worked in a walk-in clinic, has renewed this prescription in few months. And some other doctors, who worked in walk-in clinics, or in private offices, have unconditionally renewed the renewal of Dr. Piche, including Dr. Rohan, Dr. Pushie, and others. Some of them even suggested to change the prescription for another medication, but I refused again, not only on above mentioned reason, but also because I need medication, which - at the same time - protects kidney.


Here an example of the fact that doctor Sigmund Zast (Zygmunt Żast) misled me, claiming that he "has no right" to prolong or replace (to renew) the prescription of Atenolol by Dr. Brzezinska. By then, I was taking Avo-Pro, and a doctor from an ordinary walk-in clinic of the same type and status as Dr. Zast"s clinic has renewed this prescription without any problem on May 20, 2005.


This, at the first glance, puts in doubt Dr. Zast"s ethical stand, and presents him as a dishonest and unethical person. However, dealing with Dr. Zast for 5 years, I knew him as a caring, moral, and compassionate man, who tried to render help when he could and was attached to his patients on emotional level. Sitting on the corridor with his innumerous patients (because he was always a popular doctor, and many people were addressing to him because they trusted him), I heard their stories about other doctors" abusive and arrogant approach, and about kindness and human approach of Dr. Zast. These marginalized and racialized people from Asia, East Europe, Africa, and Latin America have always referred to Dr. Zast as to "peoples" doctor", who was their protector and savior.


Besides, I had an impression that he liked me.


Thus, something truly extraordinary could force such a person as Dr. Zast to go against his conscience and to commit unethical acts. Only enforcement agencies (manipulated by foreign states), or gangsters, or foreign embassies" agents could sophistically drag him into a peculiar situation of ethical disorientation and no-choice acting. And, certainly, Dr. Brzezinska, who already fell into a deep amorality hole, played a very important role. She stopped Atenolol, she advised Dr. Zast to refuse antibiotics, and she worked for Canadian Immigration.


In my appeal for the permanent resident status, I claimed that - at the present time - I am in a good health, and will not become a burden for Canadian health care system; and it was true.


To refute my claim, the authorities did not hesitate to destroy my health and to employ forged diagnoses, like the diagnosis of "tuberculosis". They (some people in the government) did not stop even after the permanent resident status was granted for us, and continued to destroy my life, and life of my close ones. Being a Canadian citizen, I was never treated as a true Canadian citizen, and was permanently persecuted and punished for my views and attitudes stated in my refugee claim.


So, even if Dr. Zast did not receive the counter-steering from Dr. Brzezinska and from his colleagues from the Jewish General Hospital, he could not but to draw conclusions on the danger related to such a patient as I am, at least - just on how hospitals and laboratories have proceeded my tests and performed compilations of tests' official reports (and other diagnostic procedures). He knew very well the whole saga of the falsified by Immigration diagnosis "tuberculosis", and about other gangster methods of Immigration in relation to my case. And he was, probably, afraid. In my opinion, he could not prescribe antibiotics, because he did not want any conflict with the government. He saw that the office test confirmed the infection, and perfectly knew that there is an acute UTI, but his fear of troubles was stronger that his call of duty and pangs of conscience. Even without the intervention of Dr. Brzezinska, he already took his decision.


If I was on his place and in his personal "conscience boots", I would refuse antibiotics in a hope that the lab test, which, certainly, must confirm the infection, will become a judicial base, a "medical permit" for antibiotics', like a justifying "alibi". However, not just two most earlier lab tests appeared to be "negative", but all the following. Dr. Zast just did not find enough courage in his heart for antibiotics' prescription, although he perfectly realized that not only the loss of my tests (that - theoretically - can happen in rare and occasional, extremely exceptional cases, but, certainly, not so regularly, systematically), but also a false negative result on microbiology-culture in January, 2001 - right after the presence of both blood and infection in the sample, - was non-doubtfully confirmed by his office"s "litmus paper" test: is prompting about falsification. Besides, not only such a knowledgeable and experienced doctor, but even a medical student would immediately realize that, if a lab report excuse an absence of microbiology culture in the printout by a claim of alleged "traces of antibiotics": this is a fraud, the more so, that Dr. Zast perfectly knew that I was not taking antibiotics.


Back in his native Poland, Dr. Zast used to work (shortly) as a team doctor of combined Polish sport clubs, and, consequently, had to be initiated into some political secrets and into typical intrigues in the sport world. As someone, who worked for the government, and being a very smart individual, Dr. Zast could calculate the level of danger very adequately, apprehending links between my refugee claim; illegal actions of Canadian Federal Immigration against me and my family members; criminal methods of Immigration Medical Services; falsified (by bureaucrats) diagnosis; altered or falsified, or "missing", or incomplete lab tests; and other terrorist actions, which victim I became. He may even exaggerate the danger for himself, and for his patient, because could not prevision (as I did) that both Canadian government, as well as foreign governments' agents (who initiated persecutions), used people like me as their testing ground of new oppression methods against 80 percent of population, and, thus, had no plans to kill us.


A tortori, he could not take into consideration that true Canadian patriots (as well as true United States patriots) in the governments and in other powerful structures clearly understood that, as a person, who burned all bridges behind and tie his life exclusively with Canada, will do everything to guarantee his children and grandchildren, and country of their residency a bright future. They, certainly, realize, that my constructive analysis of the situation and future tendencies is very useful for Canada, and, especially, for Quebec, serving today's and future prosperity, and denouncing ephemeral one-day purposes and plans of sharks and vampires, who's only goal and desire is to rob this country and other countries, even if tomorrow Canada and Quebec disappear from the political map, and the whole human race will be exterminated.


Prima facie, he had just the above mentioned reasons to be cautious, but there were many of additional reasons, which contributed to an alarm, including some more deep and subtle. For example, among other alarms for Dr. Zast, there were 2 microbiologists" signatures, instead of one.


To my knowledge, only one signature of chief microbiologist - as a rule - appears under the tests" reports in St.-Mary"s hospital. I have seen dozens of tests results (not just mine, but also my mother"s, for example) from this particular laboratory, with the signature of Dr. Dylewski alone (Dr. J. Dylewski is a known and respected microbiologist). But someone such as Dr. Libman (Dr. Moshe Libman) was also signing my tests, so, why his signature appeared on my tests" reports, together with the signature of doctor Dylewski? (See an example below: 2 pages).


Never, neither before, nor later, except of this particular short period of time (in my own tests" results), I saw 2 microbiologists" signatures on this particular laboratory"s medical documents.


This suspicious test was done in St.-Mary"s laboratory - however, Doctor Michael Libman was working for Montreal" Jewish General and Montreal General Hospitals. He cooperates with the Canadian federal (not Quebec) Ministry of Immigration (Canadian Federal Immigration), and with different military and enforced agencies, and also plays important (if not principal) role in an international society on monitoring infections (International Society of Travel Medicine and CanTravNet Core Sites) caught during traveling. He is one of the leading experts on tropical diseases and the director of Center of Tropical diseases (J. D. MacLean Centre for Tropical Diseases) and some rare very specific infections.


Doctor Libman was an active consultant in the Compartment of Infectious Diseases (Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Microbiology, McGill University Health Centre), and later (so far) - its director. He could be - theoretically (also - as an employee of Infectious Diseases Unit [and as doctor cooperating with Immigration], to which I was obligatory sent by the order from Immigration-MCI on basis of the counterfeit diagnosis "tuberculosis") - involved in the bogus diagnosis "tuberculosis", which Immigration forged in an attempt to sabotage the final procedure of the registration of our permanent residents" status of Canada. It is very probable that he works in close cooperation with the Israeli government. It is absolutely possible that a close colleague of Dr. M. Libman, or even he himself was the person who attacked me on December 2, 2000, at the Montreal Chest Institute, when I went there to obtain a copy of the forged fluorography with the false diagnosis "tuberculosis".


I will repeat briefly the above described event (also described in first 2 books of this series).


Approximately at 15:45 (December, 2, 2000), a certain doctor intercepted me on the stairs at Montreal Chest Institute, and, holding an alleged Immigration fluorography (in an envelope with my name on it) in his hands, threatened that if I refuse the "treatment of tuberculosis", I will be infected with a urological infection.


It happened after a call that I received from Madam Lucy Gefroy (or Jefroi, or Joyfroid), concerning the letter from Montreal Chest Institute, which ordered me to show up at the Infectious Disease Unit - because, allegedly, I was "infected", and "it is mandatory" to undergo the "treatment for tuberculosis".


This letter informed me that the Federal Immigration notified MCI and the Infectious Diseases Unit that, allegedly, I am "suffering from tuberculosis". (We will note - at the same time - that I ever, since 1971, till the present time, had neither a pneumonia, nor a long cough, nor bronchitis, nor any other diseases of lungs or bronchial tubes).


According to some information, a private medical laboratory - Services Médicaux Steven Herskovits Inc. - from 2008 to 2013 maintained frequent contacts with Dr. M. Libman. Its owner, who was the grandson of world-famous Jewish anthropologist, was the same person, who in 2007 refused me any medical help, when I was hit by car, even refused to administrate an ultrasound of my damaged blood vessels (lower limbs) (Double Doppler ultrasound)...


In May, 2002, Dr. Rohan prescribed Apo-Metronidazol: apparently, in connection with the same problem of hypokalemia for which (and also because of my persistent requests to renew the blood pressure controlling pills) doctor Zast prescribed Novo-Triamzid.


In the middle or (most likely) at the end of April, 2001, when I came to see Dr. Rohan, the doctor started an unusual conversation, claiming that other doctors communicated with him (addressing to him as to my family doctor) concerning my conflicts with the medical department of Immigration (IMS), Montreal Chest Institute (MCI), Dr. Wanda Brzezinska, and the Jewish General Hospital (I never visited JGH due to my own problems, but my mother was taken there by an ambulance in March, 2001, with a suspected stroke). These unnamed doctors (and, allegedly, my "well-wishers") claimed that I, supposedly, "offend" medics; that I, allegedly, suffer from a "prosecution mania" (connected to medicine and doctors); that I spread "slander" about doctors "on Internet" and "on compact disks". Dr. Rohan did not mention this directly, but it was a hint in his words that these doctors "recommended" that he better send me to the Jewish General Hospital, and that "there is one psychiatrist" in the Jewish General Hospital, a very good specialist. Dr. Rohan said that he "could" refer me to him.


When I took an interest whether these "good-wishers" advised him to send me to a psychiatrist, and, besides, not somewhere else, but to the Jewish hospital, Dr. Rohan retired to the background, became confused, and did not bring up this subject any more.


I reminded him that the Medical Department of Immigration (Immigration Medical Services), Montreal Chest Institute (part of Royal Victoria Hospital), and Dr. Wanda Brzezinska (as my former long-term family doctor), already "advised" me - in November-December, 2000 - to be treated for "tuberculosis". And not just advised, but mandatory ordered me to surrender to the Infectious Diseases Unit, and not just ordered, but also threatened, in case of disobedience, to put me into immigration prison.


I reminded him that it was he (still before becoming my family doctor), who saved me from their "advices" (i.e. from their criminal fraud). But if, I said, he had enough adherences to principles and courage to reject the "tubercular" insinuations, then, now it is a high time to reject just similar "psychiatric" insinuations.


And, while the reason of their rage is my ethical ideological stand, the Medical Department of Immigration (IMS), Montreal Chest Institute, Jewish General Hospital, and Dr. Wanda Brzezinska: it is the same subject from the legal point of view.


Since this very moment, medics in any Canadian medical institution started to demand from me to tell my name, date of birth, my address, and phone number, and - sometimes - to respond to a question about the present date: before any medical procedure - from blood test to X-ray - was given a green light.


Since then, the mistrust to everything that I am saying - has started to emerge: including symptoms" description and any health complains - and that was nothing else but a wider and open sabotage of medical care. The artificial undermining of my health started right there: because any person cannot survive in the modern society and in the modern situation without medical care.


Apparently, somewhere in my medical file - in the medical institutions affiliated with McGill University, and later in any other place - there has to be something, some special tag, or a record note, like a warning or caution to all medical officers: do not trust that patient, be alerted and doubt his adequacy.


Since that moment, symptoms and complaints described by me - were ignored, and, in general, anything that I told - was ignored in different degrees: depending of the nefariousness of any given medical officer.


But even the most decent and goodhearted of them began to slight me, to be afraid of me, or to scoff: as soon as opened my file or turned on their computer.


Then my family doctor has confessed that someone showed a "keen interest" in my medical file, and, in response, I asked him to keep my chart separately from other medical files (the dossiers of other patients). He took it very seriously, and immediately hid my file to a secured place.


Few years after, it happened to be a break (twice) into my family doctor"s office. The intruders searched for something; all charts of his patients were thrown to the floor.


In response to this attack, an additional camera and controlling device - separated from this

medical building's general security surveillance - were installed in his office.


However, let's return to that appointment in April, 2001, when, in response to my request to prescribe Flomax and Flagyl, or something else "like Flagyl": my family doctor called me in (after a while), and - already in his office - handed over (to me) 2 medications without prescription, for 1 time without renewal. When, after a while, I asked him to repeat the same, he, I think, wrote out one prescription. However, I am not sure about that, my memory is fading, when I recall this episode, and my notes about it are very vague.


During the same period, he refused 2 more requests: to refer me to urologist and to renew the blood pressure controlling medication. I visited 5 medical institutions, trying to get to urologist without any referral, but unsuccessfully.


Twice my family doctor sent me for urine tests when all UTI symptoms repeated: acute urethritis, inconsistency, urgency, itching, dermatosis and inflammation, micturition, dysuria, pain in case of urgency, etc.


But, at St.-Mary"s Hospital's laboratory, infection was never found (for all years!). (During further presentation of events, it will be told about other lab tests, outside of Montreal, which almost regularly found entherococci).


It is only possible to imagine, what enormous pressure was put upon my family doctor, an extra-class specialist. If meeting him - for me - was the sign that I, after all, was born under a lucky star, then for him the day when I became his patient, was, probably, an ill-fated occurrence. For these few honest, courageous, emphatic doctors, whom I could trust, I, probably, became a very hard burden. Almost everything that happened to me and around me, probably, put before them permanent moral dilemmas and undermined their deep-seated faith in the importance of their own mission, in an apolitical indifference of the Canadian medical care, and in moral bases of their vocation. It, probably, put an oppressing, demoralizing impact on such "doctors by birth", up to the damage to their own health. I understood this late enough, and, since then, tried to solve the problems with other doctors, but the situations of force majeure repeat; my life is on stake, - and, sometimes, I just have no alternatives.


Concerning Dr. Zast, a suggestion that, when he understood that exaggerated a danger to himself, he began to change his attitude towards me, in his attempts to redress wrongdoing.


In October, 2001, I went to Dr. Zygmund Zast, with the same symptoms again. As well as at the beginning of 2001, the test in his office showed an infection, but in St.-Mary"s laboratory they did not find any infection again... It began "to read off scale" and forced to doubt the reliability of the results of my tests. Suspicion crept in that my analyses "are politized" as the history of wars and revolutions.


The saddest was that doctor Zast, having prescribed antibiotics, ordered not to take them, until the test report is not made yet, and the infection is not confirmed. Doctor Zast, as well as my family doctor, was able to speak so convincingly and authoritatively, with such a confidence that I listened to him... And in vain...


However, when, at the brink of a new infection attack, I opened the container with the pills, I discovered only 6 pills inside! Thus, even if I did not listen to Dr. Zast and would decide to take antibiotics anyway, it was not possible.


In August or September, 2001, my family doctor departed to his native East-Central Europe. Having returned, he, at my request, guaranteed me (through his secretary) the report of my last laboratory test, but, when I came to pick it up, my charter was not found on site. It was not found neither in doctor's office, nor in the iron storage near the bureau of the secretary.


Next day the doctor could not find it, either. I assumed that, remembering my cautions, he hid it so safely that later could not find it himself. Nevertheless, the folder (my chart) has "reappeared" next day, but incomplete. 3 or 4 of the last tests results were missing, as well as some other medical documents.


I immediately went to St.-Mary"s laboratory, and demanded copies of my 4 last tests. They showed humanity there, and began to look for registration records, and, finally, declared that did not find records about my blood and urine tests. I asked - why. The response was that just because I did not do any tests there. In total, I made 11 tests in St.-Mary"s Hospital"s laboratory... The same was repeated to me in the medical archive as well, where the results of my 4 last tests were missing.


On December 12, 2002, Dr. Zast sent me (at my request) to abdominal-pelvic ultrasonography. On December 26, 2002, I sent a fax with the requisition"s copy to Hôpital General de Montréal (Montreal General Hospital), and received an appointment"s date.


On January 15, 2003, I underwent this ultrasonography, and was told that no deviations (including prostate"s state) were revealed. However, doctor Zast did not receive this report (the findings-resume of this ultrasound), which I did not manage to find in the medical archive, too. This test irrevocably disappeared: gone.


In 2022, I demanded Dr. Zast, Dr. Rohan, Dr. Blanchet, Dr. Pichet, Dr. Puchie, and other doctors to name a real urological diagnosis, because, otherwise, it appeared that I have no problems, while - in reality - my life has turned into a nightmare since January 2001. I argued that the tests show not normal density, presence of blood, and other deviations from the norm, and this alone (without even considering the symptoms) is an evidence of something.


Since October, 2002, I began to insist categorically on a referral to urologist: in connection with sharp deterioration. And, as my family doctor with the same categoriality continued to refuse me such a referral to urologist, at the end of November, 2002, I sent my demands in writing:


1. Concerning urological problems: adequate exams and tests on detection of all main infections of this sphere, but not in two closest to your office on Cote des Neiges hospitals.

2. Concerning urological problems and arthritis - consultation: a) rheumatologist and (or) osteopath; b) urologist.


Among other things, I wrote in this message of December, 2002: "What is disturbing me: there is no diagnosis, no official confirmation that I have this or another illness. (...)".


Having received my message, my family doctor said to me that - as a patient - I am "not welcomed". Nevertheless, I continued to visit him in December, 2002, and in January 2003.


I was at his office on December 18 and 20, 2002.


Because of his (extremely rare, but taking sometimes place) forgetfulness, my family doctor has written out 2 similar tests" requisites (including microbiological culture), and - on January 8, 2003 - I went, at first, to the laboratory of St.-Mary's Hospital, and then (the same day) to the laboratory of Hôpital General de Montréal (Montreal General Hospital).


For the first time (I think) since January, 2001, I did the tests not in St.-Mary"s hospital. I managed to obtain a copy of this blood-urine test from Hôpital General de Montréal (Montreal General Hospital) still before seeing doctor Rohan.


There I read that a urological infection was found. An odd thing was not only that a concrete infection was not specified in the report (what exactly microbiological culture caused the infection). Page "1" is marked in the bottom of the page - but normally they do not mark pages in Montreal laboratories in this way. (See the copy (the image) of that January, 8, 2003, report below).


According to all standards, it supposed to be so: "1 of 1", or "1 of 3".


According to all standards, the urine analysis includes - at least - biochemistry, microscopy and culture (microbiology).


It is - ALWAYS - 2 or 3 pages (depending on hospital).


THIS urine test (January 8, 2003) revealed both "blood traces", and the infection (M-subparagraph (M-PP). But there is nothing about a contagium, except a "mysterious" note "bacteria 2+)" and "see below".


But there is nothing "below" - any more text!


In the line of occult blood, the "trace" is printed (i.e. blood is present; bleeding).


Proteins "are present", too, which is one more indicator of an infection.


In the line "crystals" - many oxalated.


In the line "bacterium" - 2+.


Detection of crystals meant the probability of stones formation in the urological path organs, and doctors shall address this problem somehow adequately and urgently.


Any doctor shall sound an alarm!


But neither Dr. Rohan, nor Dr. Robert Pishe (who also received a copy from the lab) not even let me know, and other 7 doctors (to whom I sent copies later) have never contacted me. Why?


CHAPTER 3.


JANUARY 8-10, 2003.


On January 10, 2003, I was seeing Dr. Rohan, but he - having already received the result of the above-mentioned test from January 8, 2003 - told me nothing about the infection and did not prescribe antibiotics. He was not aware of the fact that I already know the content of this test"s printout. When - in couple of days - I came to his secretary, she kindly allowed me to look at both results (from St.-Mary's and MGH lab), and made for me a copy of the test from St.-Mary"s Hospital"s laboratory. There was no infection mentioned in the printout from St.-Mary"s lab, as I assumed in advance. While the majority of the "occasional" tests from other laboratories - as a rule - found UTI, St.-Mary's lab (where I passed most of the blood-urine tests!) NEVER detected any infection. Unfortunately, I did not manage to see the doctor - because, at that moment, one his patient fainted directly in his office, and, naturally, doctor had no time for me. But I left him a note with a request to prescribe antibiotics due to the test result from Hôpital General de Montréal laboratory (Montreal General Hospital), and added in the same note that the discrepancy in urine tests of January 8, 2003, from 2 different laboratories confirmed that "something is not OK" with my tests.


I do not know whether my note got to the doctor.


Here it is necessary to make a very important remark. Something was not OK with the test from Montreal General Hospital" laboratory as well - as it was already mentioned (see above).


Though "urological infection is found" was specified there, nothing was added to that, and this is outlandish bizarre. A similar statement generally does not occur in official reports from Montreal laboratories. It is usually specified that such a microorganism is found, and its response to any given group of antibiotics is also specified.


But here is - nothing.


Therefore, the response of Dr. Rohan to this official report could also be inadequate. Possibly, he shall be engaged in clearings up the situation - concerning this strange result, but, under an avalanche of other similar events around me, he, it is not excluded, whether was frightened by an expected response of medical authorities (they could declare him "inadequate"), whether he just had neither time, nor forces, nor resources for an appropriate reaction. Another thing is that he could send me immediately for retesting, and - in this regard - it is absolutely unclear how such a brilliant doctor did not do it.


(Though, then he would be punished for sending me to 3 urine tests in a row, which, again, threatened with troubles... But, after all, I think, it should not stop him.)


Any move of Dr. Rohan, Dr. Zast, and Dr. Piche would be seen by medical bureaucrats as questioning the authentic nature and adequacy of lab tests, and, consequently, as doubting the trust in Montreal medical laboratories. And this would be qualified as a mutiny and would be punished very severely.


So, there is probably an only and unique explanation.


If Dr. Rohan would send me to microbiology-culture retest, and this - retest - would show a concrete infection: I could contact (theoretically) a lawyer and file a lawsuit against both laboratories and against both hospitals, and, potentially, it would make broader repercussions up to a political scandal, which echoes would be included in newspapers and on TV. After such events, Dr. Rohan"s medical practice could be terminated, and he would have to leave his profession. And, if this would happen, it is possible that I would not survive.


And, finally: he could consider my demarche with 2 similar requisitions for blood-urine tests made in the same day in 2 different McGill hospitals - as an unethical and betraying act (however, he had to realize that such a judgement would be fair in normal circumstances, but not under the present situation).


It could be one of very important reasons.


Remembering that the sabotage of the referral to urologist is directly connected to the sabotage of my lab tests, and that the correctness of the lab analyses is a matter of life and death, I (while Dr. Rohan did not do it himself) started an investigation concerning this strange, incomplete result [8 January, 2003].


Urinalysis - including culture-microbiology - of January 8, 2003 (see above), with a line 'Urinal tract infection', implies a microorganism (bacterium), but there is no more information. Besides, there shall be other pages of the same analysis. But they were absent!


Having (since January, 2001) frequent symptoms of urological infections, I rushed on search of missing pages to the medical archive, but - in few months - received from Montreal General Hospital"s archive only the same single page (which copy, by then, on January, 10, 2003, I already received at MGH, as well as - after 10-th of January, 2003, from Dr. Rohan"s secretary).


In 2005, I was told in the archive that there is NO such a test in my file generally: no tests made in an interval of January 7-9, 2003, any more.


And, finally, in the official letter from this medical archive of April 29, 2015, it is told that "there is no urine analysis for January 8, 2003 in your file": (According to the document given below, the mentioned test "does not exist" (when I requested this test from the archive, I mentioned "7-9-th of January, 2003" as a date of sample"s collection, in case of dates' confusion in the database). (See below)


With the same test's printout in hand (from January 8, 2003) I went to see Dr. Zast, asking him to prescribe Ciproflaxin. However, to my shocking surprise, Dr. Zast refused to prescribe antibiotics.


Having concluded that an absence of any news from my family doctor means that a good relationship with him could not be restored, I went to CLSC Metro where became now a permanent patient of Dr. Robert Piché (whom I already visited few times before). This French-speaking doctor tried to do for me even more than Dr. Zast and Dr. Rohan, with whom it was easier for me to communicate on my native Polish and Russian languages (Dr. Rohan speaks Russian relatively well and understands Polish and German). But, if even such a good and experienced doctor as Dr. Zast, and a top-class doctor - Ivan Rohan - than could render me a very little help because of the tests" sabotage and the pressure, which was put upon them from all directions, Dr. Piché, with his (as it seems to me) very modest opportunities and disbelief in politically motivated sabotage, could hardly change something.


[For the reasons difficult to explain, in my records of 2003 and in my notes to doctor Piché: I quite often specified "2002" (year) - instead of "2001". Therefore, the infection, which had an effect for the first time on January, 1, 2001, is sometimes incorrectly dated - in connection with the visits to Dr. Piché - 2002. For the same reason, now it is difficult to establish since which year I began to see another doctor: an English-speaking woman, Dr. Pushie. (I became her patient much earlier - when she was seeing patients in the outpatients clinic in Royal Victoria hospital; then - after been with Dr. Zast and doctor Piché - I "came back" to her to the Westmount clinic, where she already worked by then. In the same clinic of old Royal Victoria hospital, I was referred to one more doctor, dermatologist, Dr. Beatrice Wang, who was a top class specialist, and opened (later) - together with another dermatologist - her private clinic; doctor Wang appeared not only a great expert, but also a wonderful person). Sometimes I continued to visit doctor Zast.]


I was on rendezvous with doctor Pishe on January 16, March 14, May 12, August 25, October 27, 2003, November 18, 2003, and cancelled an appointment booked for December 1, 2003, because of a severe pain in a knee, and, instead of CLSC Metro, at 5:30 went to Emergency.


Example of appointments with Dr. Robert Piché dates. (See above)


According to my notes, I came to see Dr. Piché in January, 2005, too, but did not find any documentary confirmation in my huge (prescriptions, statements, etc.) personal archive.


Just the frequency of my visits to Dr. Piché speaks about his good relation to me.


There are medical and diagnostic actions held by doctor Piché:


1. March 14, 2003 the doctor carried out a prostate test (norm).

2. Electrocardiogram (May 7, 2003).

3. Prescription on "generic" (cheap version, "substitute") blood-pressure controlling pills.

(May 12, 2003).

4. Knee X-ray (summer, 2003).

5. Special permission for me to come to CLSC laboratory at any time for urine tests when needed (when UTI symptoms recur). 3 or 4 tests, one of which at once revealed an infection, were made. (While dozens of analyses at St.-Mary"s laboratory - NEVER found anything!)

6. Kidneys and liver ultrasonography (October 27 or 28, 2003). Suspicion on calcification of kidneys and hepatic cirrhosis premises (both I managed later "to reverse" by my own treatment and means).

7. 3 blood tests, which revealed the enzymes specifying possible liver damage.

8. At first, Altace, medication for blood pressure control prescribed (October 27, 2003).

9. On November 18, 2003, Altace (causing liver and kidney pains) replaced by AVAPRO╝ (Irbesartan).


1. By the time when I started to visit Dr. Piché, I was deprived of anti-hypertonic medication for 2 years already. I outlined the situation to doctor Piché, and explained that for these 2 years the hypertension became an everyday occurrence. The fact that other doctors refused to renew the prescription (which was stopped by Dr. Brzezinska) was, certainly, not his guilt. But he knew that - by January, 2003 - the situation required an immediate attention. It is clear that he meant well, trying not to "put" me on pills for life, trying to find an alternative: demanded that I shell lose weight; put me on weights during each appointment; advised to change a diet. I lost weight, kept to a diet. But the level of blood pressure continued to rise. I stated to doctor Piché the assumption: no weight lost, no diet will help because the urological problems changed the kidney function, and, probably, the autoimmune reactions called some liver dysfunction, and only a complete healing of the urological problem, or an anti-hypertonic medication can help.

A Chinese medicine, which helped several months, ceased to work. However, not less then 1 month after stopping this Chinese medicine it was possible to take another blood-pressure-controlling remedy. Again - time was missed. As a result, I temporarily had a short breath, whistle in ears, which signifies a blow to blood vessels. Once (before Dr. Piché prescribed, finally, the pills) the blood pressure jumped up to 179 x 120.

Doctor Piché did not react to my assumption that it was the blood pressure that just at present (during this time frame) destroys my liver, but not any alcohol (which, in 2003, I consumed already for 20 years very seldom and very moderate: ones in 1-2 months, not more than 200 gr). His persuasive imperative on the fact that I supposedly should "stop drinking" - and then my liver regenerates, very much looked like a racist [Russophobe] discrimination remark (like, if you are Russian - it means, you're an alcoholic).

Whether Dr. Piché was really predisposed to prejudices concerning "these drinking Russians", or, without being a Russophobe, was just brought up on a stereotype of "Russian national alcoholism"; whether someone from "administration" purposely shaped him in this way; whether he consciously misinformed me and was engaged in sabotage: it cannot be clarified from my line item.

Was Dr. Piché not an erudite doctor (which I doubt)? Otherwise, he quickly would think that sharp saltuses of blood pressure really destroy my liver and - in particular - lead to a steatosis (fat hepatosis). Or, rather, he perfectly understood it, and, nevertheless, undertook nothing, though knew that it can call steatosis. Or, maybe, he was a follower of a doctrine that the body can heal itself, and that the pharmaceutical obsession, driven by the commercial greed, is destroying our society? The last is true, but he did not take into consideration that I might be under a constant stress, threat, and prosecution, and almost in a desperate socioeconomic situation, and this does not favoritable for any "natural healing" without medications.

I stated to doctor Piché the assumption that the enzymes of decomposition of fats badly work in me, and that the overweight, once again for the last 15 years "appeared from nowhere", contrary to a rigid diet and regular stress exercise, and are connected to other health problems.

But doctor Robert Piché did not react to this assumption in any way.

Through some time, the blood tests confirmed the correctness of my guesses.

I warned doctor Piché that without pharmacological means for blood pressure control and without preliminary treatment and treatment of liver problems not only my cardiovascular system can seriously suffer, but I am really threatened already now [or through "unlimited" number of years (as a result of ignoring of some deviations of liver functions and delaying during 2 years the renewal of anti-hypertonic pills by doctors Zast, Pishe and Rohan)] by a diabetes mellitus.


2. Urological problems.

My permanent requests to refer me to a specialist-urologist Dr. Robert Pishe met with skepticism. Doctor read that I have nothing of that kind that a CLSC doctor could not treat and that would demand urologist.

I asked him repeatedly to take a swab test, but he steadily claimed (or pretended to?) that does not understand, what is it. I communicated with Dr. Piché in French, and tried to translate from Russian the term "swab test" word-for-word. I also called this term in English: "swab test". But - by doctor"s reaction - one could get an impression that - it seems, - he did not understand what I am speaking about. As I tried to explain it to him, using the English term "swab test" - nothing helped.

Meanwhile, contrary to all urine tests and ultrasounds, which - at first - did not reveal, in CLSC, any serious abnormalities, the infection incredibly progressed, causing all possible new complications and secondary diseases. I suspect that - during this period - chronic urethritis, prostatitis and cystitis developed. And Dr. Piché, listening to my complaints and descriptions of symptoms, did not refer me to urologist, did not prescribe antibiotics, did not advise and did not offer a (UTI preventing) diet, physiotherapeutic procedures, etc. Something in preliminary treatment and treatment obviously went in the "wrong way".


3. Now, even if timely, in connection with a disease"s attack, antibiotics were prescribed, NOW they could give only a temporary relief - until the medium of the main infection was not detected and was not suppressed by specific means. The antibiotics, which I used to receive, were "light-effect" and non-sufficient for UTI treatment drugs, and my demands to prescribe Cipro were met with hostility and refusal. But even these, ineffective, antibiotics, Dr. Piche has started to prescribe in 2004 or 2005, when it was already tragically late.


4. Since August, 2003 - I began to ask doctor Pishe to administrate a course of antibiotics (concerning urological problems), but he considered that antibiotics "are not necessary" for me.


5. On May 12, 2003, sitting before me and discussing my cardiogram, Dr. Robert Pishe suddenly tore off a piece of the graphed colored paper of the cardiogram, crumpled it - and threw it out in a garbage pail (into a bit bucket). I was shocked by this act, and did not know how to react to it.


6. On November 18, 2003, I left a written request for Dr. Pishe demanding antibiotics, which he ignored in general.


7. From January to December, 2003, liver pains, against the background of abnormal "indexes" of "liver" profile in blood tests and ultrasonography - did not stop, but Dr. Pishe did not respond to it by a course of treatment.

Another strange problem during my visits to doctor Robert Pishe: his unwillingness to inform me of the result of X-rays and ultrasonography of internal organs and joints (knee, liver, kidneys, urinary and gall bladder, etc.), and 2 blood and urine count tests (which he also administrated).

For example, I underwent ultrasonography on October 28, 2003, in Hôpital General de Montréal (Montreal General Hospital).

I directed a question about these exams reports to Dr. Piché on November 18, 2003, and on January 5, 2004.

Both times he doubted the very existence of a particular X-ray, ultrasound, or blood-urine tests, which I was asking for.

Moreover, he literary said that I, allegedly, "invented" them, and, actually, never went anywhere and never had these exams and tests done (see below the evidence how bizarre was his claim).

He also asked me - "who sent you for the ultrasonography?", and - when I answered that he administrated these test, himself: doctor Piché irascibly threw that he "never sent" me for X-ray and ultrasound (échographie).

When I said that the result of the ultrasonography (which I already learned) showed that the liver is "mildly fatty infiltrated", he shrugged shoulders and began to doubt the "existence" of this official report again.

I complained to him of liver pains 4 times, and all 4 times he refused the further tests and treatment.

I will remind of what wrote above: Dr. Pishe permanently clung to the fact that supposedly my problems with liver - a consequence of "alcoholism". And, again, once again, he began to cling to such "explanation" - while I assured him that I take alcohol exceptionally rarely and moderately, and only in exclusively special instances. Besides, I said to him, I swear - in the last 20 years I almost did not consume alcohol - and, since 2002, I generally excluded it.

But Dr. Piché did not comment in any way on my assumption that the high blood pressure - during this time frame - destroys my liver. And - in which already time - has materialized his persuasive imperative that supposedly I must "stop drinking" - and then my liver regenerates.

And again, I, once again, was lost in the guesses: was Dr. Pishe an insufficiently erudite doctor, and does not know that the sharp jump of the blood pressure really destroys liver and kidneys, and - in particular - lead to steatosis (fat hepatosis), or he perfectly understood it, and, after all, consciously drove me (through his inactivity) into such a state that could cause steatosis.

Moreover, Dr. Pishe, making use of his medical expertise and his medical experience of convincing, tried to assure me that fatty liver is an "absolutely harmless" specific feature, but not a pathology, and does not lead neither to fibrosis, nor to cystosis, nor to hepatic cirrhosis.

If all the efforts of Dr. Pishe could not convince me of the "absolute harmlessness" of fat hepatosis, then doctor Zast and my former family doctor (whom I restarted visiting from time to time again) managed it. These two both had a better ability to convince people and possessed a rare charisma, and were skillful in "smart" "scientific" speeches, which shook my serious concern about the liver condition.

By then, the exams and tests spoke not about just "mildly fatty infiltrated liver" any more, but already about fatty liver (i.e. about an advanced steatosis); however, doctors Zast, Rohan, Pishe, Pushie, Blanchet (and others) not only ignored it, refusing to administrate medical treatment, or, at least, to instruct me about a diet, exercises, etc., but, on the contrary, went all out to present this problem in pink colors, and, thereby, as though to prevent my own attempts to cure steatosis.

For example, my family doctor claimed that I, allegedly, cannot judge about the fat hepatosis on the basis of "surface" (popular) medical literature - because, allegedly, "common" "scientific and medical" books "intimidate" potential patients for the benefit of vendors of medicines and druggists, and - "actually" - it is possible to live with steatosis up to "100 years", without having any bothering symptoms.

To my misfortune, he managed to "hearten" me and to provoke my excessively complacent attitude to fat hepatosis, while the level of bilirubin that was permanently climbing, and other abnormal indications related to liver enzymes showing up in my blood tests, as well as the remarks in the ultrasound reports about fatty liver and other disturbing signs - up to the end of 2014 did not prick my eyes and did not force me to begin a self-treatment of liver closely.

Actually, steatosis - if not to treated it - inevitably leads to fibrosis, cystosis, and then to a hepatic cirrhosis, and, consequently, to death. But, if good doctors tried in every way that I should "not be obsessed" with it, whether that outcome was a desired effect of those who hindered or prohibited them to carry out a medical treatment of fat hepatosis?


8. Problems with joints (arthritis?), which I always connected to 2001 urological infection, were also left without attention and without any diagnosis.

Despite several x-rays, which revealed non-traumatic pathologies, and also, despite my permanent complaints to pain, absolutely no treatment was administrated, no referral to urologist issued, and no diagnosis appeared.

Meanwhile, knee pain (sometimes both knees), thumb of a foot, shoulder and elbow specified a general disease, not just a monoarthritis.

Periodicity of joints problems and complete remission, when these problems COMPLETELY disappeared without medical remedies, furnished for doctors a fine key for understanding of what exactly could provoke arthritis, but, again, no outputs, no adequate exams, tests, and studies followed.


It is impossible to understand how could 4 excellent doctor, and, basically, moral individuals, to provoke so many of mine health problems, and (3 of them) to commit so many unethical acts.


All 4 later tried to repair this damage and to reverse things, but things are not always reparable, and, besides, something did not allow them to go all the way.


Dr. Zast, finally, prescribed antibiotics in October 2001, 10 months after the beginning of an acute urological infection, but, first, it was too late (he was late for 10 months!), and, secondly, he managed to convince me not to take them (if the test would not detect UTI; and it did not detect infection, because, probably, was sabotaged), and, thirdly, the pills" container appeared to be almost empty, while Dr. Zast could have no connection to it.


Dr. Piche has, finally, revised his decision to block me an access to anti-hypertonic medication, and prescribed it, but almost a year after my 1-st demand.


Dr. Rohan also later (as I'll show in the following description of events) has revised his previous actions, and administrated medications and medical procedures, which he was denying previously for so long. Dr. Rohan also has instructed me that garlic, sitting baths, exclusion of spicy, salt, and some other food, etc.: can be efficient against recurrent UTI. His instructions confirmed that he might receive an order from the authorities that banned prescription of antibiotics for me.


The revision of doctors" their own previous decisions undeniably show that I was right in my suggestions, judgments and demands, and that these medics have recognized my correctness. They obviously regretted their mistakes. However, there are legitimate doubts if these were their mistakes, or they just were under pressure and were manipulated by the authorities.


Concerning Dr. Pushie: in the beginning, during a short period of time, she also used denials and refusals. Later, she did no mistakes; she did not commit unethical actions. She tried everything possible to restore my health, to detect my health problems, to produce diagnoses, and to prevent my further health problems by referring me to all specialists. However, tests, which Dr. Pushie administrated, were sabotages, as well as the appointments with the specialists (urologist, ophthalmologist, gastroenterologist, etc.). The rupture of her attitude happened much later: when she blamed me for the failure of her medical strategy. As the most of Canadians, she could not accept that something like political prosecution of dissidents and systemic discrimination within the health care system could happen in her native country. Only doctors, who had their own experience and lived under totalitarian regimes, could assume that (in some isolated areas) some totalitarian methods may be used in Canada. While those methods were later extended to all spheres of life, and were expanded to the very basic rights, even the honest Canadian-born doctors have started to understand this, but it happened much later.


If doctors like Zygmund Zast, Ivan Rohan, Robert Piche, Dr. Pushie, Dr. Beatrice Wang (till 2015; later she became a different person), Dr. Szego, etc. - have undertaken a number of compassionate and correct approaches, some other doctors (like Dr. Rowen, or Dr. Morris, or doctors at Immigration Medical Services) behaved like furious beasts, whose ultimate goal was not to provide medical help, but to punish their patient, to destroy my health and to inflict so much damage by medical means as they could.


And the main weapon against me for medical administration and bureaucrats was to oblige conscious doctors to deny systemic approach to my health problems.


I repeatedly stated to doctors Zast, Pishe, Rohan, and Pushie (and to others) that the periodicity of joints" inflammation is directly connected (and matched) to the periodicity of acute urological problems.


As we see, at first, Doctor Robert Pishe did not have his hand and foot bind, as it applies to Dr. Zast and Dr. Rohan, who in 2001 - 2003 took insufficiently vigorous measures for diagnostic and treatment.


At the same time, the tests done in CLSC considerably differed from the tests done in McGill hospitals laboratories (St.-Mary"s and Hôpital General de Montréal), and showed such abnormalities, which never showed the tests from McGill hospitals.


Why, then, Dr. Pishe and the CLSC laboratory had free hands in the beginning? The response is simple: because in those years the supporters of the forcible oppressive methods and politicization of the health care system (with their introduction to routine practice of so-called "profiling") - yet did not take the French medical institutions and the CLSC network under their complete control.


Meanwhile, a new acute UTI outbreak happened on November 3, 2003 (precisely on my birthday again!).


I tried to obtain an appointment with Doctor Pishe, but unsuccessfully.


On November 10, 2003 I managed to get Biseptol made in Russia (or brought from there) (or its equivalent), and - since November 15, 2003 - pain and other urological symptoms temporarily disappeared.


Instructions in Polish (Polish diet), concerning these problems also caught sight to me.


The Polish diet could play a known role.


But I understood that - without a specific course of antibiotics, targeting a particular microorganism - the infection all the same will return, and - on November 18, 2003 - I left my written note for Dr. Piché, asking him to prescribe antibiotics (Cipro) (i.e. repeating my demand, which he always ignored). My demand was very timely and relevant: after December 1, 2003, when I took a shower in the cold bathroom, on December 2, 2003 - symptoms returned.


Soon after January, 2001, i.e. from the beginning of new infections, I understood that acute recurrences are provoked by:

1) overcooling or cold;

2) alcohol (especially beer); and

3) spicy food.


(In December-January, 2001, I "betrayed" my total rejection of alcohol twice, having drunk one and second time of half-glass of beer).


On December 2, 2003, I started to take antibiotics, which were prescribed to my wife by her dentist, plus tetracycline (after), and - on December 7, 2003 - again there came some relief.


But in that day (on December 7, 2003) I stumbled - and nearly fell.


Oddly, this insignificant percussion of my body caused unexpectedly severe pain in the left kidney. The pain did not cease for 3 days, sometimes becoming literally intolerable. But I could not go to CLSC or to emergency of any hospital - because these days my mother was operated concerning breast cancer, and I continually was with her.


It is possible to assume that sharp kidney pain was caused by dilation of kidney holding muscles; a stone or "sand"; or infection. But I also assumed a different scenario. Only since November, 2003, after almost 3-year break, I began to take anti-hypertonic pills again. Not only that their earliest action owed be very strong, a rapid falloff of the blood pressure could be also promoted by urological problems (as well as blood pressure rapid raise in other cases and situations), especially: by dysuria. Just before December 7-th, 2003, the blood pressure fell down to 100 x 60, which was very unusual for me in that period. When the blood pressure decreases too suddenly and quickly, even a small shake of the body can injure a kidney, in principle. By the way, I was given anti-hypertension pills in the pharmacy without any instruction and description of side effects and usage.


This damage to the left kidney could generate the cyst, which has formed in 2003-2004, and was a product of chronic (now) infection, aggravated by the sabotage of medical response to it. Suspecting the damage to the left kidney, I unsuccessfully tried to get an access to medical care, but it was completely blocked for me. If this happened at least 15 years later, it could correspond to the general health care degradation in Quebec, but in 2003 people normally could get to a doctor, especially in Montreal.


From November 20 to December 5, 2003, I tried to arrange an emergency appointment with Dr. Piché, but unsuccessfully. I waited up to 4-5 hours in different walk-in clinics, all in vein, because people coming after me were called to a doctor, but not me. I do not remember, why I could not see Dr. Zast and Dr. Rohan: because did not rely on their help in this type of situation, or merely they did not work at this time, or because of a different reason.


Since December 8, 2003, I stopped taking anti-hypertonic pills for several days, and, it, probably, contributed to normalization of the situation with the left kidney.


However, while the pain has gone, other disturbing symptoms manifested later on.


On January 1, 2004, and, then, on February 5, 2004: abundant and very sticky transparent discharge after 1) abortive attempt to learn to ride (friend"s) bike; 2) long sitting on a bench back.


(My failure to learn riding a bike had something to do with the bicycle technically [a frame, too high for my height, and the sitting] and psychologically [not my bicycle; when, in the 2006, I got my own bike, I sat on it - and went biking from the 1-st attempt]).


Since the beginning of 2002, gross hematuria (macrohematuria), which was already seen by "unaided eye", just increased.


Since 2002, hematuria, under the term "microhematuria", was noticed in the reports of urine tests.


At the beginning of 2001, in my notes and faxes to doctors (in desperation, I was employing any venue to be, finally, heard) I described primary symptoms thus: dysurea; micturition; urgency; frequency; inconsistency; interruption; hematuria; painful bladder; back pain; burning; itching; dermatoses, etc. All this occurred - as a result - of obviously incorrect laboratory analysis and doctors" refusal of antibiotics. I did not receive timely a course of antibiotics, and it provoked further complications:


1) joint pain of feet and knees;

2) "bags" under eyes;

3) mild pain in groin (possibly, ureter or a seed strand);

4) watery eyes;

5) steady dysuria, etc.;

6) frequent ulcerations in mouth;

7) positive test on HLA-B27;

8) damage of skin and mucous.


In total, I saw 5 doctors (besides "casual" doctors) in 2001-2002; none of them prescribed antibiotics.


In 2002, I addressed by a letter in CLSC (December, 2002), having described especially dramatic by then manifestations of arthritis, heartache and rise of cardiovascular problems.


From this letter, it is possible to draw a conclusion that - since January, 2001, and up to November, 2002, - problems of joints (knees and elbows) accrued, having reached the apogee in November-December, 2002; then declined. The joints" pain started approximately in 5-6 months after the first symptoms of an acute urological infection. (Possibly - earlier).


Heartaches accompanying this infection could specify an endocarditis.


Knee pain and reduced mobility became by then so serious that I hardly walked upstairs, on bus steps, etc. (from the text of the mentioned letter).


It is hard to imagine what I did and how I worked on myself to neutralize the effects of the damage to knees and elbows - today (in 2017) - being able to walk, run, ride bicycle and roller blades, to sit down and get up as healthy people. It is difficult to imagine what volume of medical and "near"-medical literature I had to study in search of methods of such a recovery.


In 2002-2004, I was so naive that trusted doctors' and medical institutions' promises of "not to enter in the file" and "not to pass to 3-rd parties" my notes, faxes and other requests, and not to mention my immigration history and ideological orientation, and, being do naïve, I, by referring to my immigration ordeal and its roots, bind Dr. Piché"s hands also as well...


It is very important to stress that till 2003 - there was no BPE yet.


Shortly before the events of 9-11, in July-August 2001, a number of suspicious incidents occurred to the most non-trivially-thinking dissidents. In August 2001, a heavy metallic basket-tube has fallen from the roof of a renovated building when I was close to my home (we lived on Aylmer by then), and could kill me.


After the events of 9-11, for about a year in the 2001 (or till the middle 2002), I noticed a persuasive shadowing, for which young people of 16-19 were used; they were badly trained or absolutely untrained: it was not a big work to leave them behind, and, besides, no serious confrontation (or threat) was felt in the style of this shadowing. I described some of these examples of sporadic shadowing in my articles, in diaries, and letters to friends. The basic changes happened somewhere between 2004 and 2005. By then the Canadian political regime has drastically changed, becoming a police state, and my own fate was very worsening by it. By then the surveillance became permanent, often demonstrative and persuasive (an intimidation style), and began to be carried out by skillful and well-prepared people, and in an increasing frequency with an involvement of police.


When a new concierge, a former employee of police, appeared (together with the surveillance cameras in the hall) in our house on Aylmer Street in 2004-2005, a police car started to intercept me often at the corner of Aylmer and Milton, or at the corner of Sherbrook and Aylmer, or just near home. The same repeated when I was returning home. It began approximately in 8 months prior to our moving from downtown to P.S.C. The concierge, who monitored us not only in and around the building, defiantly aggressively took part in shadowing, and followed me in the subway and in the buses to remote areas of the city, where he persistently followed me closely. He responded to each my attempt to sneak from the building imperceptibly by spiteful attacks, aggressive threats, and threats to evict us.


The government and the predator landlords were carrying out a campaign of eviction of law-income families from Montreal Downtown, employing criminal, gangster methods, and we had no choice, but to move from downtown due to aggressive attacks, crimes against our property, illegal breaks into our apartment (when the landlord's bandits used to do a considerable damage), impossible living conditions (because the concierge and landlord's subcontractor workers literally used to commit pogroms, destroying our apartment), and danger to our kids.


When we moved from Aylmer to PSC, the appearance of police in 4-6 minutes after my exit, and 4-6 minutes prior to my approach to home became a norm.


I was stopped by police and penalized by illegal fines dozens of times, but the densest and persistent police escorting manifested when I had to go to medical institutions and to doctors. When I had a medical appointment, police escorted me from my home to Metro, then from Metro to my "medical destination", and, on my way back: in the opposite order.


Then ALL doctors (whom I visited) suddenly began to show (as if on command) that they do not trust my words, do not trust listing and description of symptoms: as though I invent them. But, if you come to a medical specialist with a heart attack or with a renal colic - and this doctor outrageously shows that does not believe you: a visit to such a doctor may pose a risk not only to your health, but also to your life. The chronology of the beginning of the systemic police escorting to medical institutions - and the total medics" mistrust in my words - have shown a palpable coherence.


Even doctors, whom I saw for the first time, repeatedly expressed doubts in truthfulness of my complaints.


Doctors LaChantie, Pishe, Faran, Pushie, Morris, and others - dozens of times hinted me, or even openly said that they do not trust me, when I spoke about bleeding, pain, infection, or about other symptoms and syndromes.


The same doctors (as well as others) REPEATEDLY expressed doubts that an X-ray, a blood-urine test, ultrasound, or something else that I mentioned - exists.


When I reminded each of them that he (or she) directed me to this exam, they openly expressed mistrust. And even then, when I brought a copy of an X-ray or of a lab test: they looked at it with mistrust as if I "drew" this copy myself.


For example, on January 5, 2004, Dr. Robert Piché has responded to my questions concerning the ultrasound from October 28, 2003 (I told him that Dr. Giovanni Artho reported about "fatty liver"): "Are you sure that you went and did this ultrasound? Perhaps, you never did it?".


On April 2, 2015, Dr. Rohan has reacted to my question about elbow"s joint X-ray of March 4, 2015: "Are you sure that you did this X-ray? Who sent you for it? I did not send you". Then I obtained a copy of the mentioned X-ray, and, sending it by fax to Dr. Rohan, attributed: "I am sending you the X-ray (elbow" joint) of March 4, 2015, which - as you claim - you did not receive. However, in the Intelerad PACS system (pacs.vmmed.com) this X-ray (see its requisition number further) it was marked as "sent by the fax".


Only by 2015-2016 it became obvious that the results of my laboratory tests and all kind of medical exams simply may not arrive to doctors (in 2002-2005, and then in the 2014-2015) in time, or did not arrive in at all, and the Intelerad PACS system could display untrue statements.


In 2000-s, hospitals, medical laboratories, radiologies, and other medical institutions already became only a part of a wider system, which included all kinds of innumerous private companies and corporations, with their innumerous foreign partners, computer and computerized networks, security agencies, enforcement agencies, surveillance technologies" providers, and so on. It is impossible (knowing this) to conclude if doctors responded to my questions in such a way just because they were irritated by my persuasive inquiries, or because they were facing long retardation of the arrival of my medical exams" reports.


When I was hit by car, and, at night from October 2 to 3, 2007, I showed up at St.-Mary"s Hospital Emergency with the injuries of lower limbs, the triage nurse and doctor Stephen Gershkovitch defiantly expressed doubts that I am telling the truth. They stated ungrounded insinuations that, allegedly, I just fell (without any collision), and "invented" that I was hit by car.


They refused to write down the car"s plate license number, the name of the street where it happened, the driver's signs, etc.


Those two and other staff of the Emergency also refused (while I insisted on) to communicate with police and to report this road accident. My application-declaration to the police concerning this accident was completely ignored. (The book "The Mistreatment of My Injuries" has the detailed description of this case (see in this series).


In total, from 2005 to 2013, police ignored 8 of my declarations concerning attacks, hits by cars, and other incidents.


But, if doctors, and police - certainly - automatically determine ANY of my claim as "untrue" (going against the common sense, presumptions of innocence, and other basic principles), and police, besides, systematically escorts, intercepts, interrogates and searches me (the policemen stopped, intercepted, interrogated, hailed, escorted me hundreds of times, and searched 2 times): whether it is reasonable to assume that a source of such mistreatment is mutual for both medics and policeman, and that the medical institutions and medics (as their "part-time job") perform the function of police officers?


I evoke a dialog with Dr. Robert Piché as a common example of a particular "style" (January 5, 2004). No doubt that by this moment Dr. Piché already had his hands "bind": in a result of my own requests, complaints, demands and claims, which he could not and did not want to understand; and as a result of presumable pressure "from outside".


Doctor Piché was not able to realize where and how there was a "puncture" (failure) with my treatment though his initial desire to help me burst forth, and a patient came across to him, ready for any procedures, any diet, if only to restore health.


He was tangled in the complex artful patterns of thinly set up sabotage - because did not believe my intelligible and simple explanation and my interpretation of the facts and events.


By 2004, Doctor Pishe, apparently, already obtained "green light" and guarantee of impunity for any - even the wildest - claims and acts during my visits.


At the very beginning of our dialog, he (answering my written request) sounded his refusal to refer me to urologist and to administer a course of antibiotics. At both requests he spoke in French: "C"est pas necessaire" (there is no need).


When I asked to administer a course of treatment from arthritis (presumably deposits of salts), he said "there is no arthritis".


[Just the same response, the same words ("you have no arthritis"), used Dr. Krasny Dr. Rohan in this particular period. Whether there could be accidental a similar unanimity?]


Then I asked him to state another presumable reason of pain in knees, elbows, right shoulder and right leg"s calf (knee pain was so severe that I was not able to walk upstairs).


He answered, having switched to English: there is no medical diagnosis explaining knee pains.


I showed him that the knee is red and hot (signs of inflammation), and then reminded him that he sent me for X-ray, and himself told me about a problem with cartilaginous tissue in my knees. He answered: it is a mechanical problem of your knees, treatment for this does not exist. A physical therapy could help, but it is too expensive.


In reply, I noted that - concerning any joints - there is a treatment and that my joints are destroyed, apparently, by the adjournment of salts and calcification tendinitis, in connection with a urological infection since January, 2001. I reminded that twice urine tests revealed hematuria (blood), and that with respect thereto he sent me to ultrasonography. The infection, apparently, influenced kidneys function, therefore an excess of uric acid provoking attacks of inflammation of joints (arthritis). Chronic adjournment of salts can lead to deposits (crystallization) on joints both around them, and to collapse of softer (than bones) tissue.


And I pulled out a copy of the X-Ray (a paper) showing it to Dr. Piche. It was the X-Ray done on 27 May 2003 (see below). [next page]


X-ray of both knees of May 27, 2003 on Dr. Robert Pishe"s request. This X-ray revealed a superior osteophyte in the right knee - most likely, adjournment of salts. Small additional tests were needed to clarify a diagnosis and to administrate a treatment, but Dr. Piche did nothing. Was it accidental? Whether accidentally Dr. Robert Pishe, who, having received the result of this X-ray, and already knowing about the pathology, continued to deny this X-Ray"s very existence persistently: as though it is some children's game.


He responded on it that a certain level of calcification (like sand; small crystals) can come and leave, without any harm for internals.


"All this nonsense. Why did you come today? What can I do for you?".


I noted that already explained what he can do for me (a referral to urologist, a course of antibiotics, treatment of arthritis).


Certainly, Dr. Pishe gave no answers, so, I said that, if he cannot help me with, at least, a referral to urologist and course of antibiotics (because I have an acute urine infection again), then I raise additional questions: about liver pain and the abnormal results in my blood tests, X-rays and ultrasound.


He answered it so:


"You said that you tried to treat yourself by antibiotics, which could get without prescription? Right? Liver pain can be linked to it".


I said that the liver pain began long BEFORE I took THESE antibiotics, and that I am complaining about it to him since my 1-st appointment. And, secondly, if I would receive antibiotics on his prescription, he would "dump" liver pain on them as well?


- And, it... It has no relation to pathology. You, probably, consume alcohol, and your liver reacts to it.

- Since January, 2001, that is since the beginning of urological infection, I practically refused alcohol. And definitely did not consume alcohol since our 1st meeting.


The blood test (May 10, 2003) report (which was incomplete the same as the urine test of January 8, 2003, which revealed a urological infection) - from 8 May 2003 (report - on May 9-10). In the paragraph "liver profile", all indicators (in exception of one) were abnormal. In combination with the ultrasound test, reporting "fatty liver", and permanent liver pains: it was a serious medical concern, but, still, Dr. Piché ignored these symptoms (as well as their source: chronic urological infection), and, what was the strangest: denied not just the gravity of this condition, but its very existence, despite all the tests and exams" reports. (Lab tests, X-Rays, ultrasounds, etc.). He even accused me in "inventing" liver pains. (As far as I know liver has no real pain receptors. However, there are many conditions and situations, under which liver pain is real and undeniable).


Blood test on October 14, 2003 (administrated by Dr. Pishe) also shows the abnormally high bilirubin (liver!), and also reflects other abnormal indications, but a lot more moderate than in the blood test report of May 8-9, 2003 (see above).


Such considerable fluctuations specified an explicit pathology (for example, an immunological response to an infection) and required an immediate medical attention. But - even on my demands - doctors did nothing. (See below).


From the blood test report (October 14, 2003); liver enzymes.


Here is how Dr. Piche responded to my last argument.


- Anyway, we have no medical confirmation that something is not normal with your liver, and we cannot treat you only for an alleged pain.

- "Alleged" pain? That is, you want to tell that I invented liver pain, perhaps? And what about the ultrasound? Dr. Giovanni Artho reported about "fatty liver".


Dr. Piché again denied that such an ultrasound exists. However, this report exists indeed, and I showed it to Dr. Piché several times, while he expressed no reaction and did not apologize for his doubt in this ultrasound (done in Hôpital General de Montréal):


(see below)


PAGE 1 OF 1 ULTRASOUND CONSULTATION

OUTPATIENT GUNIN, LEV

HT: CM DOB: 1955/11/03 UNIT + .... MS/SEX: 3 / M WT: KG

3455 ELMER+201 (...) MONTREAL PQ H2X2B5

(Tel....) MC+

(Med.Card...) EXP: ......


ADMITTING MD: BILLING CODE: 01

REQ. MD: PICHETTE м STATUS: PHONE: EXT:

APPRVD BY: ORDER ENT.BY: ROY, SUZANNE RPT TO: CLSC CENTRALE

CC TO:

HIST: INFECTION, R/O ANY ABNORMALITIES IN KIDNEYS

DIAG:

PREV.REL.FLMS. :

ALLERGY:

EXAM. REQ.: REQ +: (......)

U/S ABDOMEN COMPLETE

U/S PELVIS LIMITED


TECHNICIAN: BELAND, N. R.T

....................................................................................................


RADIOLOGIST REPORT: DATE OF REPORT: 2003/10/28 14:26

RESULT REPORT:

ABDOMINAL AND PELVIC ULTRASOUND:


FINDINGS:


THE LIVER IS MILDLY FATTY INFILTRATED. NO FOCAL LESION. THE LIVER SURFACE IS SMOOTH. THERE IS NO SIGN FOR CHRONIC PARENCHYMAL DISEASE. GALLBLADDER, BILIARY TREE, PANCREAS, SPLEEN AND KIDNEYS UNREMARKABLE. THE RIGHT KIDNEY 12CM AND THE LEFT KIDNEY 12.2CM. A SIMPLE 1.5CM LEFT KIDNEY CYST. 3MM CALCIFICATION IN THE LEFT KIDNEY INTERPOLAR REGION MOST LIKELY A MILK CALCIUM CYST. THIS SHOWS SOME RING-DOMN ARTIFACTS. THE URINARY BLADDER IS PARTIALLY FILLED THOUGH DOES NOT SHOW THICKENED WALL. IMPRESSION: 1) MILDLY FATTY LIVER. 2) SMALL MILK OF CALCIUM CYST IN THE LEFT KIDNEY. SIMPLE 1.5CM LEFT KIDNEY CYST. NO EXPLANATION FOR THE PATIENT'S HEMATURIA.


FELLOW: RADIOLOGIST: ARTHO, GIOVANNI RESIDENT:

RESULT ENTERED BY: ARTHO, GIOVANNI 2003/10/2S 14:10


ATTENTION: T H I S I S A C O P Y - D O N O T F I L E


[End of "HEALTH CARE AS A REPRESSIVE TOOL" [THE PUNITIVE HEALTH CARE]; BOOK 5-1: THE UROLOGICAL DRAMA. PART 1.]


________________


Lev Gunin


THE PUNITIVE HEALTH CARE

[HEALTH CARE AS A REPRESSIVE TOOL]


BOOK 5-2


THE UROLOGICAL DRAMA. PART 2. [Oct. 2003 - Nov. 2011]


CONTENT

Chapter 1.

Chapter 2.

Chapter 3.

Chapter 4.

Chapter 5.

Chapter 6.

Chapter 7.

Chapter 8.


__________


* * *


The whole text of the chronological events and medical documents (under the name of "The Punitive Health Care - (Health Care as a Repressive Tool)" is available for examination only on the basis of the following contract between the author and the reader:


I (THE READER) GIVE MY CONSENT THAT, BY CLICKING CORRESPONDING LINKS AND ACCESSING THE TEXT OF "THE PUNITIVE HEALTH CARE", I AUTOMATICALLY AGREE TO THE FOLLOWING PRELIMINARY CONDITIONS [FOR READING]:


-- I am (at least) 18 years old.


1. I (the reader) is undertaking (commit myself) not to distribute the text of "The Punitive Health Care - (Health Care as a Repressive Tool)" - entirely, or in fragments; not to copy medical documents; and not to share the text and images without author' permission.


2. I (the reader) understand that the confidential information, which is contained in this text, cannot be used for any other [than the reading (extraneous; secondary)] purposes and needs, for any researches, essays, stories, etc.


3. I (the reader) commit myself not to sneer at open ticklish personal information (which sharing was induced by circumstances), not to savor any medical, physiological, or anatomic details, and not to use this text as a reason for mockery and persecution.


4. I (the reader) am warned by the author that, except for a number of obviously immoral (by definition) doctors' and medical staff's actions, other decisions and acts described in this "confession" are not subjected to hasty moral assessment because a) only experts can judge finally about their justification and fairness; b) explanations and vindications of other party are necessary. We also do not know to what degree the doctors were under an influence and direct power of police, Ministry of Immigration, and other enforcement agencies, political organizations, groups and persons - with their own ideological, economic, and propaganda interests, - and to what degree this influence impacted on their diagnostic conclusions and assessments of patient's state of health. Many of the documentary confirmed facts incontestably demonstrate that author's ideological stand (who's opposing to younger generation's transformation into zombie-biorobots with mobile phones on shoulders instead of heads; to electronic totalitarianism with its prison-like total video surveillance; and to the tyrannical political censorship) played nearly a major role in enraging the authorities and triggering the persecutions.


5. I (the reader) am warned that the author sees the main cause of the most dramatic (for him) events in the fact that the enforcement agencies and interested persons and groups managed to present him to the medical community as an individual incapable to evaluate his health condition objectively; as a health-consciousan (or hypochondriac); an extremist; a troublemaker; an individual obsessed with panic and alarm patterns; as a person, who is making unreal demands to the system of medical care - concerning his - allegedly - pseudo-maladies and exaggerated gravity of trivial indispositions. This smear campaign of defamation, scurrilous libel, and wicked calumny made impossible receiving an adequate medical care (and sometimes any medical help at all), and led to health undermining, numerous diseases, incidents, and unnecessary sufferings. Doctors also considered difficult to believe in continuous (not connected with each other) illnesses, with an interval of 4-7 days, sometimes rolling at the same time: as tsunami. They refused to believe in these sequences of illnesses' painful course, danger, and significance. This chronicle disproves such a prejudiced opinion, producing an incontestable evidence.


6. I (the reader) am informed that all negative remarks, characteristics, and facts' assessments belong only to the portrayal of criminal groups, extremists, and carriers of anti-humanistic, racist, and totalitarian ideology, but do not contain groundless generalizations and negative assessment of any country, ethnic group, or religion. The author is categorically against dismantling of any of the existing states, and against restrictions of the rights of religious congregations of any faith.


7. I (the reader) am informed that this edition partially presents the previous 2017 edition without any changes, and, thus, may not correspond to later view and opinions.


8. I (the English reader) am informed that some parts of the following English text of "The Punitive Health Care" - were translated from Polish, Russian, or French originals, and may contain primitive language, double interpretation, or puzzled meaning. Such confusing fragments should be compared with their originals in Polish and Russian languages (author's native languages) [2016-2017]; all controversial points must be resolved through such a comparison.


9. In the very last moment of this edition's make-up (April 2023), the author came across a description of so-called Havana-syndrome, and found same symptoms and complications, which he experienced when was attacked by an unknown remote weapon (3 Nov. 2005, 7 Jan. 2013, and 21 June 2016), and developed symptoms of post-microwave irradiation.


_________


CHAPTER 1.


In the previous part (see: HEALTH CARE AS A REPRESSIVE TOOL - [THE PUNITIVE HEALTH CARE] - BOOK 5-1 - THE UROLOGICAL DRAMA. PART 1), I already described 2 blood-urine tests from the same day, done in 2 different hospitals, St.-Mary's, and Montreal General Hospital (January 8, 2003). The test from St.-Mary's lab did not found any infection (as ALL dozens of tests in this laboratory, while the test from MGH found infection, but did not mention its microorganism, and was printed out with strange deviation from the norm and with violations of the standards.


As I already described, my family doctor (January 10, 2003) told me nothing about the infection, did not comment on this test at all, and did not prescribed antibiotics.


I already described how - in January 2003 - it became abundantly clear that the medical laboratories destroy some of my lab tests, or alter other test, falsifying some data, or issue incomplete and inadequate reports.


I also already described in the previous part (BOOK 5-1 - THE UROLOGICAL DRAMA. PART 1) complicated relations with Dr. Piche, and his controversial and contradictory actions in 2003-2004.


I already described weird Dr. Piche's reaction to my worries about the abnormal results of X-Rays (etc.) and lab tests (which alerted the need of medical treatment).


Here how Dr. Piche responded to my last argument.


- Anyway, we have no medical confirmation that something is not normal with your liver, and we cannot treat you only for an alleged pain.

- "Alleged" pain? That is, you want to tell that I invented liver pain, perhaps? And what about the ultrasound? Dr. Giovanni Artho reported about "fatty liver".


Dr. Pishe again denied that such an ultrasound exists. However, this report exists indeed, and I showed it to Dr. Piche several times, while he expressed no reaction and did not apologize for his doubt in this ultrasound (done in Hôpital General de Montréal):

(see below)

PAGE 1 OF 1 ULTRASOUND CONSULTATION

OUTPATIENT GUNIN, LEV

HT: CM DOB: 1955/11/03 UNIT + .... MS/SEX: 3 / M WT: KG

3455 ELMER+201 (...) MONTREAL PQ H2X2B5

(Tel....) MC+

(Med.Card...) EXP: ......


ADMITTING MD: BILLING CODE: 01

REQ. MD: PICHETTE м STATUS: PHONE: EXT:

APPRVD BY: ORDER ENT.BY: ROY, SUZANNE RPT TO: CLSC CENTRALE

CC TO:

HIST: INFECTION, R/O ANY ABNORMALITIES IN KIDNEYS

DIAG:

PREV.REL.FLMS. :

ALLERGY:

EXAM. REQ.: REQ +: (......)

U/S ABDOMEN COMPLETE

U/S PELVIS LIMITED


TECHNICIAN: BELAND, N. R.T

....................................................................................................


RADIOLOGIST REPORT: DATE OF REPORT: 2003/10/28 14:26

RESULT REPORT:

ABDOMINAL AND PELVIC ULTRASOUND:


FINDINGS:


THE LIVER IS MILDLY FATTY INFILTRATED. NO FOCAL LESION. THE LIVER SURFACE IS SMOOTH. THERE IS NO SIGN FOR CHRONIC PARENCHYMAL DISEASE. GALLBLADDER, BILIARY TREE, PANCREAS, SPLEEN AND KIDNEYS UNREMARKABLE. THE RIGHT KIDNEY 12CM AND THE LEFT KIDNEY 12.2CM. A SIMPLE 1.5CM LEFT KIDNEY CYST. 3MM CALCIFICATION IN THE LEFT KIDNEY INTERPOLAR REGION MOST LIKELY A MILK CALCIUM CYST. THIS SHOWS SOME RING-DOMN ARTIFACTS. THE URINARY BLADDER IS PARTIALLY FILLED THOUGH DOES NOT SHOW THICKENED WALL. IMPRESSION: 1) MILDLY FATTY LIVER. 2) SMALL MILK OF CALCIUM CYST IN THE LEFT KIDNEY. SIMPLE 1.5CM LEFT KIDNEY CYST. NO EXPLANATION FOR THE PATIENT'S HEMATURIA.


FELLOW: RADIOLOGIST: ARTHO, GIOVANNI RESIDENT:

RESULT ENTERED BY: ARTHO, GIOVANNI 2003/10/2S 14:10


*ATTENTION: T H I S I S A C O P Y - D O N O T F I L E*


____


Dr. Piche's reaction to inquiries concerning the abdominal-pelvic ultrasound from October 28, 2003, was bizarre as well.


If exams and tests results are resonating with unwell, when a patient is feeling sick, and the number of abnormalities is constantly growing, and when these health problems become too significant for such a relatively young person, all worries and inquiries are highly justified.


Here is this ultrasound report, which would provoke a worrying reaction of any adequate patient, including the most lucid and self-controlled people (see below):


If we look at this document carefully, it becomes evident that Dr. Rohan and Dr. Piche, in reality, basically, did not doubt the very existence of the several tests and exams that they administrated themselves; at least, they boldly denied the very existence of these tests not only because they were irritated by patient's questions and demands. On the contrary, they used to say that this or another test (exam) [report] "does not exist" - equally - because they 1) used to receive them not in time (after such a delay that considered them missing); 2) treated some of the tests" or exams" reports strange or suspicious.


This ultrasound is a good example.


In the address line, the name of my street was entered with a mistake (instead of Aylmer, it was printed: "Elmer"). The name of the doctor was entered with a serious mistake ("Pichette", instead of Piché). Instead of CLSC Metro it is entered "CLSC Central". There is no doctor"s name, license number, or telephone; and, in addition, a strange warning: "Attention: this is a copy - do not file".


However, instead of being indignant that my tests and exams are criminally manipulated and neglected, doctors were angry on me, as if it was my fault. This is how oppressive regimes terrorize and suppress conscientious objectors; and this is how oppressive regimes" brainwashed loyalists put the whole guilt on victims, not on mass murderers: just the same mentality.


So, as it is easy to note (I repeat), doctor"s surname is written PICHETTE, instead of Piché; the street name is written (in my address) ELMER, instead of Aylmer, and there are other "corrigendas" ("misprints").


If information was entered manually, even then only 1 "error" still could be "explained" somehow, but 2 and more are not any randomness any more. However, in 2003, such data as surnames of doctor and patient, address, phone number, etc. - was already entered automatically in a digital way, via special computer programs and templates, and an incorrect name of the doctor, of the street, etc. - ... such an avalanche of mistakes could be inserted only intentionally.


This unique, exclusive case unlocks the whole mechanism of concealment ("loss") of my exams and tests, automatically becoming unavailable for me and doctors, but remaining accessible to someone else. Really, it is impossible to find such a test by doctor"s name: Doctor Pichette in reality, perhaps, does not exist, and, if exists, has nothing to do with Dr. Piché.


In turn, search by patient"s name almost for certainly would be disabled in few months: not least because of an intended error in the address. I managed "to snatch out" this ultrasound report at the last moment literally from "fire".


Whether doctor Pishe (Piché) took a part in this sabotage: this is good question.


In the hospital, I managed to learn that the official report was, allegedly, sent to the doctor - to CLSC, to Dr. Piché, on October 29, 2003. But whether really it was sent to Dr. Piché, or sent to nonexistent doctor Pichette: it is a good question, too.


If the latter (Dr. Piche) did not receive this document, he could really believe that I deceived him, and did not go to this ultrasonography (so - to such a degree - he was, possibly, biased against me; and did not wish to trust any statements about "politicization" of my diagnoses, exams and medical tests). It is not excluded that - by January, 2004 - he already assumed that there is a grain of truth in my statements, but his slavish nature and his congenital habit to obey the authorities (together with the elementary fear) - retained him from going on my side.


And quite another deal, if doctor Pishe (after all) received this ultrasound report, but hid it from me, consciously conspiring with someone.


CHAPTER 2.


As I already emphasized, the most dramatic impact on my health problems was partially provoked by altered, incorrect, lost, or not complete laboratory test. However, even if a lab test reported alarming abnormal results, doctors did not react and did not take actions.


Urine test (see above) of January 31, 2003.

All indexes differ from the norm.

This test"s result with serious deviations was typical for the given period.

Even without the microbiological culture (its report was again lost [was missing], i.e. just disappeared), it is evident that there is a urinal infection.

Doctors shall sound an alarm, administrate antibiotics, additional tests and exams, refer a patient to urologist (due to systematic abnormal tests like this one) and to other doctors for consultation, but - as we can see, - instead, doctor Pishe, doctor Pushie (who offered me all possible referrals only in 2004 (5?)-2006), doctor Zast, and other doctors selected the tactics of denial and refusals.


Concerning the refusal of antibiotics, it must be added (for the following years) that not only blunt-bold refusals, but also cunning prescriptions of non-correct antibiotics, or prescriptions of not the right dose of Cipro and not on right terms' length (for 3, 5 or 7 days only, for fighting an acute and long-lasted infection) contributed to 14-years-long (already in 2014) UT infection, while bringing only short periods of relief and poisoning (in vain!) liver and other organs, and generating potential cellular (genetic) damage and aging acceleration.


Urine analysis result from January 8, 2003 (see below):


[It is important to notice that this tests" report was sent not only to Dr. Rohan, but also to Dr. Piche.]


(see below)


The strangenesses of this analysis begin already with the fact that the urological infection is noticed, but the agent (microorganism, culture) is not specified. If the conclusion about an infection was based exclusively on an indirect data - on the abnormalities of components (in my test - abnormal number of platelet, an "infectious color", abnormal definite specific weight, presence of blood, proteins, etc.), and the assumption of a probable bacteria - then there would be another matter. But in the section "Microscopy", on the line "Bacteria" - it is designated "2+", which, obviously, is a mention of more than 2 bacteria as detection.


In the abstract of the result, there is "urinary tract infection", "see below"; but there is nothing below.


I managed to obtain only this single page in the hospital (in addition to blood test's (done simultaneously at the same time) pages).


In 2004 - 2007, I tried to clarify from doctors (Dr. Piche and Dr. Rohan, and 2 other doctors, to whom I asked the lab to fax copies) - what microorganism caused this infection, but they repeatedly stated that they have no more paged of this printouts of the same test, except of this one and only page.


However, all the suspicious circumstances linked to this test do not come to an end yet.


None of the doctors (including Dr. Rohan), who received this report-result with the note "urinal tract infection", did call me about it; they did not administer antibiotics, i.e. completely ignored such an alarming medical test"s result. They never contacted me in connection with this test and just concealed it from me. Why? All 4 doctors (especially Dr. Rohan) were the most moral and empathically attached to their patients. It means that the answer lays beyond them, i.e. it is a clue that they were forced to comply with some type of ban or some rule, which they would never support if they had a chance to choose.


In few months, in the same 2003, I tried to recover other pages of the same analysis in the medical archive, but - again - just this one and only page was given to me.


In 2005, they told me that, allegedly, there is no urine test done on January 7-9, 2003, in my file any more.


And, finally, the document - given below (from the same hospital"s medical archive) - already confirms in writing that such a test "does not exist":


Thus, by the sabotage of preliminary diagnostics and treatment of serious infectious disease (which extended complications to musculoskeletal, cardiovascular, and other body"s systems were ravaging my health), they tighten a stranglehold on my neck for more than 15 years, pushing me closer and closer to a premature infirmity and death. [This clause was written in 2016, before the 1-st urological surgery.]


The same weapon was used and utilized for preventing (not to allow) the heyday of my creativity. If I was a healthy person, then I would do more and wrote much more and more productively. And the quality and completeness of my creative works in music, literature, history, philosophy and science would be more convincing.


Now, let"s take a small break, and to put into the light some of the most unethical but common practices in the urological health care.


First of all, we must mention that the most efficient and effective medical methodic and techniques are kept secret for the benefit of money-extorting medical mafia.


After my drama in 2001, years later, I learned that such problems as chronic urinal tract infection (including the infection of prostate, prostatitis, and complications), BPE, etc., can be treated with 90 per cent efficiency by those let into this secret. Before approximately 2013-2015, the marketing and advertisement of such methods shied away, and were kept mostly to the verbal whisper from mouth to mouth. Then, as the privatization of medical services aggressively offended everywhere, they became cynically wide-spread on the Internet and even at the local level.


I learned that those methods are not profanation or scam. They really work, but only for the VERY rich. They include a complex approach with a combination of medical measures like physiotherapy, massage, medications (including a special course of antibiotics, herbal extracts, prostate-shrinking pills; and so on), exercises, and number of other tools. I personally know people who were successfully healed for big backs - with no reoccurrence. Despite the fact that some doctors, who just cheating their patients - actually having no adequate skills and knowledge, - other doctors really do what they promise, but the cost of their services is just shocking.


These mass murderers keep their secrets for themselves, without sharing this knowledge for the benefit of all patients.


Many of them use public medical facilities and public resources for their personal enrichment, which is outraged. Being a patient of Dr. Morris, I was witnessing how a number of people approached him at his private office and at St.-Mary"s Hospital for some payable urological procedures like cystoscopy. Normally, in Canada, if cystoscopy is necessary, it is done for free and (in Quebec) is covered by the RAMQ card. I was surprised and guessed for whom and under what conditions it becomes payable.


If doctors benefit from the cystoscopy financially, they can potentially be interested in more cystoscopies, and overuse this degrading, invasive, and dangerous procedure (don't listen to all the lies that it is "completely harmless"!) - instead of safe, less degrading, and commonly accessible procedures (like virtual cystoscopy; trans-rectal prostate ultrasound; MRI; CT; etc).


I heard persistent rumors that Dr. Morris can treat BPE (the most common killer of men), but only for private (not public) patients. With time, BPE transforms into calcification or (and) cancer, and, in the most cases, this happens due to doctors" guilt, because they do not want to treat patients for free or for small amount of money. Tenths or even hundreds of millions of men globally suffer (half of their life) or die just because of them.


Usually, prostatitis, BPE, bladder problems, cords" inflammation, bladder and kidney stones, kidney damage, and everything including cancer: are complications of the initial untreated acute urinal tract infection (UTI) in men and women. But why the acute UTI is usually untreated? How it happens that people must suffer during great part of their life due to mismanaging of acute UTI?


Let"s perceive it step by step.


In most of the cases, such an infection has nothing to do with sexually transmitted diseases, and caused by suppression of the immune system, stress, poverty, exposure to anti-sanitary conditions, excessive exploitation, inequality, travels, poor living conditions, housing crises, non-renovated and poorly kept - by the landlords (in rental apartments) - bathrooms, toilets, etc. In other words, most of the people affected by acute UTI are victims of social crimes and inequality, and pay the price for their abusers" profit. But, not only that they are already victims of shouting injustice, they are also spat out (as second-class citizens) by the health care system.


First of all, doctors react very differently to UTI in their wealthy clients and in marginalized populations. (I know it from my own experience and from people of my social status). Doctors consider UTI in patients with law social status as not life-threatening minor health issue.


Secondly, there is a semi-secret policy about the use of antibiotics.


Even if you got an appointment with such ethical doctors like Dr. Rohan, Dr. Zast, Dr. Viviott, Dr. El-Hackim, Dr. Szego, Dr. St.-Jacques, or Dr. Pushie, who don't discriminate against marginalized people, they are obliged to play by the same rules; otherwise, they can be striped of their medical license. And, when it comes to antibiotics, such a prescription will be put under a magnifying glass of the scrutiny and suspicion.


The excessive use of antibiotics became one of the major problems in the XX century, provoking mutation of microorganisms, which become resistant to treatment, more dangerous and more contagious.


However, it is not a reason, but a consequence, because the excessive use of antibiotics has evolved in response to situation, when poor patients (80 per cents of population even in rich developed countries) were neglected, becoming sufferers with the launched diseases. If the prevention, prophylactics, and early stages' treatment are neglected, antibiotics become an easy and cheap response to all the complications of untreated health problems.


Now, a huge part of the medical society is pushing forward a policy of restricting the use of antibiotics, a policy that is already reflected in thousands of resolutions, rules, regulations, and internal protocols. This topic is not widely discussed and hidden from the wide public, excerpted from discourse. And some doctors, like Dr. Morris, are just mad about the use of antibiotics, trying to impose this policy (in its extreme form) to other doctors. They become furious if someone prescribed antibiotics, especially for a low-income patient.


Conscious doctors like Dr. Rohan, Dr. Zast, Dr. Szego, and, probably, Dr. Piche: are under permanent pressure from their colleagues and medical administration, which can punish them if they prescribe antibiotics for "non-important" patients "too often". Concerning non-conscious doctors: they prescribe antibiotics just in life-threatening cases, or if they scared that a wealthy and powerful patient can fight back.


Accidently, I learned about a furious anti-antibiotic doctor, who did a lot of harm to his patients by denying antibiotics to them, but when it came to his own health, he used antibiotics for himself without any hesitation. He also used to prescribe antibiotics for his own family members without any restrictions or restrains.


So, anti-antibiotics medics-partisans often risk their patients" life and good health, but, when it concerns themselves and their love ones, they consider their own well-being more important than the restrictive usage of antibiotics.


If the governments, medical system, hospitals, other medical institutions, and doctors would not abuse marginalizes low-income patients, the use of antibiotics would decrease in half.


However, even considering all written above, my case was especially outraged, because no patient with the 1-st UTI normally demands antibiotics, poses correct questions, knows own diagnosis, and put reasonable demands. Besides, Dr. Zast did everything correctly: he did not ignore my claim about UTI; he performed an in-office test (which showed an infection); and sent me for a laboratory test. In this case, the common sense and medical logic hinted that he MUST prescribe antibiotics even before the test results, because the infection was so evident.


Here even a bigger outrage comes: Dr. Zast was influenced by another medical professional (Dr. Wanda Brzezinska), who was manipulated and commanded by such an enforcement agency as Canadian Federal Immigration, and, in addition, my lab test was obviously "scrambled" and destroyed.


I can list another example how the righteous acts of compassionate doctors are destroyed by their blatant vicious colleagues.


Such an act of sabotage happened at Van Horn, where Dr. Zast and several other doctors worked in a miniature local policlinic on a loft, in degrading - for doctors and their patients - conditions. The very existence - in this Van Horn's area, inhabited by low-income marginalized immigrants - of such a policlinic with the conditions below the norms of the poorest underdeveloped countries, tells more about the double standards' deceptive nature of Canadian political-corporate elite and its deceptive "health care" more than anything else.


At my request, at the beginning of 2000-s (probably, before 2003), Dr. Zast referred me to a surgeon, who was weekly (1-2 times a week) examining patients in the same policlinic.


I said that I have a cyst on my forehead (around an old scar - where it formed), with an extensive infiltrate. I demanded 2 small surgeries for preventing an eventual calcification, which goal would be to ensure the drainage of furunculosis and infiltrate, and removing the cyst (2-nd stage). The surgeon laughed, and asked, if I really want a scar that will disfigure my forehead? I responded, with a similar smile that scars "decorate a man", and continued demanding the surgery.


Then this moral freak just kicked me out, having said that he does not see any need in such a surgery.


When my demands were ignored at Van Horn clinic, I turned to doctor Pushie in the same case, and to another female doctor (of oriental origin), who was practicing (if my memory is precise) by then at the same "outpatient clinic" at Royal Victoria Hospital.


This time I was even more persistent in demanding the surgery (certainly, first of all, I demanded a referral to a surgeon). Doctor Pushi told me to come after tomorrow (probably for consultation with a surgeon), but - when I came, instead of her, I saw another - very young - female doctor, who said that I am nervous, that I have an anxiety, and that - therefore - I, allegedly, "exaggerate the problem", and refused me a referral to a surgeon.


But someone from the doctors of the same policlinic (probably, the same female of oriental origin) nevertheless referred me to a surgeon, in the same place, at Royal Victoria Hospital"s outpatient clinic, and THIS surgeon, having examined my forehead, refused the surgery, too.


When the calcification already started, I tried to get an urgent appointment with any doctor (at Royal Victoria's Outpatients clinic) from the secretaries, but they also behaved cruelly and humiliatingly (one of them said that she "sees nothing"; another one said that my problem is "not life-threatening", and does not need any urgency).


Thus, it wasn't an isolated exceptional incident, but a particular government's system of systemic and systematic discrimination, unusual cruelty, and denial of essential medical assistance.


All this continued 3-4 years. And, finally, when I got to a surgeon again, the infiltrate already calcified, and it was already too late to perform a surgery. A bone growth has formed on my forehead, which forever disfigured my face worse than any cuts or scars could (see 2 photos of 2017 below):


Usually I try to lower my hairs to hide this very noticeable defect. But this damage (in this case: a conscious harm to a patient) - was caused by several doctors, who perfectly realized the consequences for their patient. This outraged example once again proves the tradition of mutual responsibility of physicians and an absence of any protection of patients in Canada.


So, why 4 honest doctors with human approach - Dr. Zhast, Dr. Piche, Dr. Pusie and Dr. Rohan - did not achieve success in prevention and treatment of my serious health problems (which could be easily done), and also could not cure those problems, which already arose at a boundary of 1999 - 2001 because of diversionary and provocative actions of the Federal Immigration and other enforcement agencies?


Why did they not achieve success - contrary to everything that they did for me? (As I understood later: sometimes they did for me even more than Canadian doctors usually do for most of their patients).


It, definitely, happened because of the pressure and influence from "outside", including the pressure from their colleagues-doctors and medical authorities, including Immigration Medical Services (IMS) and Dr. Wanda Brzezinska, who was affiliated with IMS.


It also happened because of the repressive policy of some medical institutions and medics connected to police, Immigration, other enforcement agencies, political parties, foreign states" agents, and specific organizations and government circles.


It happened also because of the sabotage of diagnoses at the level of the medical databases and information exchange through information networks; at the level of laboratories and other diagnostic units.


And, finally, it happened due to a number of incurable diseases of Canadian health care system, such as, for example, an absence in Canada of free treatment of such diseases as prostatitis, fat hepatosis, etc., and due to complete ignoring by medics of public (not private) sector of innumerous medical diagnoses: as though these problems do not exist at all.


CHAPTER 3.


2003-2004.


New UTI infection"s recurrence started since January 1, 2003.


Again 1-st of January, a very symbolic date, especially, considering that the acute initial infection also started on 1-st January (2001) [the year of 9-11 terrorist"s attacks, and new millennium start].


However, this is not an end of all strange (even suspicious) "coincidences", because, exactly like the laboratory test (analysis) - in January 2001 - was sabotaged, the lab test on January 8, 2003 (on requisition of my "most permanent" family doctor) was also sabotaged: its report was incomplete, strange, and confusing. It revealed both "blood traces" and a mysterious infection M-PP (which means M-paragraph-subparagraph). Yet, there are NO any paragraph or subparagraph in this report - below the statement about infection. On the contrary, nothing is told about a contagium, except a "mysterious" note "bacteria 2+)" [more than 2 bacteria?] and "see below". But there is nothing "below" - any more text!


Another suspicious fact: the doctor, who is famous for his conscientiousness and self-discipline, did not inform me about the infection and did not prescribe antibiotics: never. Was it happening because he was perplexed by this unclear and confusing test's report? If so, his duty was to redo the test, administrating another laboratory analysis, which could clear up the situation. Theoretically, this report may not reach his office, but the circumstances compel to doubt it. Thus, he definitely was hiding something from me, including the infection, in addition, not prescribing antibiotics and not sending me for another (additional) test. Besides, this report was obviously prepared to be erased from the system, and, if I did not rash to archive "in the last moment", attaining the copy "from fire", I would never learn about this infection.


So, the only conclusion-explanation is that the real and reliable diagnostic data is often concealed, going to unknown database, while most of the doctors and I myself have no access to this database; we are fed by incomplete, unreliable, untrue, and non-authentic medical data. And, if some doctors somehow receive the pieces of the true medical data, they are forced to conceal them from some (or from many?) of their patients and to take no actions even if this data required an immediate medical intervention.


This draconian oppressive policy has caused the sinister medical sabotage, prevented the effective treatment of the infection, and triggered innumerous complications.


One of 5 doctors, whom I was visiting in 2003-2004, finally, prescribed antibiotics, but I was denied antibiotics in the pharmacy. (I was asked whether the prescription of antibiotics was based on laboratory tests results!). As the next step: they contacted the doctor: and antibiotics were cancelled!


In 2001 - 2004, I demanded antibiotics 15 (!) times, and was steadily refused.


By 2002-2003, it became obvious that the deterioration can be provoked by overcooling, spicy and salty food, and some other food and drinks, alcohol, considerably cooled drinks from fridge, etc.


Typically (as a rule), when there was an aggravation of the chronic infection - I managed to pass a urinalysis microbiology (culture) test in one or another hospital's laboratory. Was it accidental that many of them were missing (disappeared), and the rest of the tests (this part, which did not disappear) persistently showed "all normals" (as if these tests were done to a computer avatar, but not to a living person)?


At the same time - it is necessary to consider also that the tests, which were done in other, alternative networks of medical clinics and laboratories in the previous period (CLSC, community clinics, Hotel Dieu, etc.), showing numerous abnormal indicators.


Was it coincidental that very few lab tests done in medical labs outside of Montreal, ALL, with no exceptions (!!!) has shown an infection, and found a particular pathogen: enterococci?


Other tests and exams could not find the main reasons of all health problems because they did not intend for this (to detect the problems). They only burned our already slim financial resources - when I had to spend up to 10 dollars a day (and more) for traveling to doctors and hospitals, to undergo ultrasonography and X-rays in private radiological offices (120 dollars, and more), etc. Still, other payable tests were detecting real health problems, which public tests have never found.


Knowing about my very difficult financial (socioeconomic) situation, doctors, nevertheless, "provoked" these spending, disastrous for us:


The ultrasound"s report (Dr. Zast) from 12 Feb. 2004.


This (see above) ultrasound"s payment receipt: 100 Canadian Dollars.


Did this happen because doctors did not trust the government and the governmental medical laboratories, or because the government simply forbid them to administrate such medical tests for me in some particular periods?


The response to this question is rather simple: Dr. Zast, Dr. Krasny, Dr. Pushi, or doctor Rohan knew about my mistrust concerning the reports (ultrasonography, X-rays, etc.) from the state medical institutions, and also took into consideration the urgency of data retrieval. And, indeed, if to take a close look objectively at the facts, then it is obvious that the "private" or "communal" tests (for example, this ultrasound (see above) and tests from CLSC) indeed found problems that NEVER been detected in the state English hospitals, including the most recent examples, while these tests from private labs (or imaging labs) and CLSCs were few, and the tests from the state hospitals - innumerous.


For example, the ultrasound administrated by Dr. Zast, found a cyst in the left kidney, which any previous ultrasound in the English public hospitals (affiliated with McGill university) never detected, persistently "not seeing"; the X-ray in the French Hôpital Hôtel Dieu and ultrasound from CLSC revealed fat hepatosis, which was never detected in McGill hospitals; and the ultrasounds administrated by Dr. Zast and CLSC - a cyst and a stone 3 mm in the left kidney.


But, if several respected doctors believed in the validity of my mistrust to the results from the "state" laboratories and diagnostic offices: it is a confirmation of my correct vision of an overall picture. (In other words: the vanishing of my lab tests and other medical reports were not "isolated" "solitary" "errors", but represented a purposeful and politically motivated sabotage).


One more hardly explainable and curious fact: in 2004-2005 (up to 2006 or the beginnings of 2007?) "one-time" doctors, whom I was seeing in hospitals or walk-in clinics, trouble-free prescribed medications, which for months or years were refused to me by my permanent doctors. Maybe, my permanent family doctor, or Dr. Zast, or Dr. Krasny, or doctors Pharand and Morris, or Dr. Piche, or Dr. Pushie did not consider them necessary, or were sure of low-efficiency (or uselessness) of these medications?


Then, why doctor Piche - refusing me anti-hypertonic tablets - eventually finally prescribed them months later: he changed his judgement, or was FORCED to make "a concession" because the blood pressure continued to grow?


Then, why my family doctor (my "most permanent" family doctor), who also refused me - during the same period - anti-hypertonic pills - later was categorically against stopping them or lowering the dose (when the blood pressure has temporally fallen under 80 x 120)?


I am sure that (in 2013-2015) Dr. Morris"s regular refusal to prescribe antibiotics led to a dangerous autoimmune response, development of arthritis, urolithiasis, and other serious complications, and Dr. Krasny"s and my family doctor"s refusal (2014-2015) to prescribe timely anti-inflammatory - triggered multiple joints-bones injuries and others complications.


Or, maybe, my family doctor refused me (summer, 2014) antibiotic ointment, antibiotics, and other pharmacological therapies and a referral to a surgeon - concerning a hyper-huge abscess on the infected cyst on my back - just because considered all these means "unnecessary", "ineffective", or even "harmful", and believed that the abscess somehow "will resolve" by "itself"?!


Perhaps, he did not see in what stage was the abscess, or "did not attach any significance" though he perfectly knew that this tiny cyst on a stubbing scar (in the middle of my back) has inflamed innumerous times, and perfectly understood that the delaying of an urgent medical interference inevitably leads to unavoidable serious consequences, will strengthen patient"s sufferings on orders, and will extend the period necessary for healing in 10 or 20 times?


A single reasonable explanation envisions some sort of conspiracy, which exists in the medical care system and directed against patients like me. It is hard to say if this conspiracy is related to patients" socioeconomic situation, marginalization, or it is a politically motivated approach, or altogether.


It is hard to say if doctors, whom I most often visited, participated in this conspiracy, or they just were forced to comply.


But it is clear that something very disturbing exists in St.-Mary"s Hospital, which located just 2 blocks from the giant Jewish General Hospital, and connected to the latter by innumerous cooperative links. On one hand, it is a very good hospital, equipped by relatively adequate medical apparatus, and served by professional medical specialists, but, on the other hand, this hospital is practicing a "selective" treatment of different patients, depending of their origin, political or ideological views, religion, etc.


If the listed above and some other doctors rejected my requests just because (in their judgement) there was no need in them: then why they later suddenly - with a big delay - easily granted me my previous requests: when the urgency (and, sometimes, the real need) completely disappeared?


A single explanation is that they were dropping their ban when such a ban was removed for them, or, in other words, when they were ALLOWED to provide medical help for me (almost always too late...).


A single explanation for blocking my access to the most urgent clinical needs of medications, diagnostic procedures and referrals to specialists by my permanent doctors, and unconditional satisfaction of my requests by "occasional" doctors - is that the "occasional" doctors were not instructed about me. (When, years later, every Quebec patient"s dossier was centralized and became accessible for any medic online, and even my own physical presence at any medical facility and my very geolocation became transparent [even while I have no cellular phone] to the governmental, corporate, and institutional spying tentacles: occasional doctors began to block me an access to the adequate treatment as well.)


See below: Ratio Klindomycin prescribed by the "one-time" doctor - Dr. Somer - on June 17, 2004.


See below: Asaphen (Azaphenum), which is written out by "one-time" doctor, Dr. Dang, November 19, 2004.


See below: cream prescribed on June 8, 2005, by Dr. Duong whom I saw only once.


See below: Opo-Ofloks, prescribed on March 19, 2005 by Dr. Narvani.


Unfortunately, Clindamycin, Apo-Oflox, or Asaphen could not fight the urinal tract infection (just was able to ease it), and my requests for Cipro occasional doctors rejected responding that they must consult my family doctor.


In 2006, first steps of the governmental efforts to consolidate the whole information on citizens in one centralize database (including medical data) have been undertaken, and, since then, often misused for oppressive goals.


Whether so accidentally in 2006 this "faucet" was also closed for me: "one-time" doctors ceased to grant me an access to medications, lab analyses, procedures, etc.


Whether accidentally in 2006-2007 each visit to an "occasional" (on duty; "one-time") doctor was convoyed by a question: do I have a family doctor (permanent therapist) and why I did not address to him?


From the second half of 2003, I began to visit Dr. Daniel Pharand.


Whatever I asked - a requisition for blood-urine test, an ultrasound, or something else - he steadily refused. 4 times I came to Dr. Pharand with an acute UTI, and, instead of writing out a requisition for a laboratory test (which I could pass in a medical institution of my choice), he, signing a special "internal" hospital's order paper, sent me to do the tests (reserved for urological patients) in Hotel Dieu, but 3 of these tests just disappeared, and the 4-th was so "abnormally" normal as if I was a baby. That's why I asked Dr. Pharand to write out requisitions for blood-urine tests, which I could pass in any hospital or in a private lab, but he always denied me such a requisition.


In response to any complaint he tried to confuse me. He met my complaints to knees pain (a collateral complication from a urological disease) by sarcasm: "Do you mean pain in knee-cups?" I will keep silent or will nod in reply, he in both cases added: "Then tell me what is a knee-cup?"


If I tried to give a hint that the frequent ulcerations in the oral cavity can be connected to autoimmune complications due to frequent urological infections, he instantly tangled me: "Sores in that place? I do not understand... There can be an ulcer of a duodenum, a stomach ulcer... Well, open your mouth! No, I definitely see nothing here!"


Mine complains about unbearable urgency, frequency, dysuria, nocturia, hematuria, itching, pain, etc., he met with a joke like "we, humans, we are not robots with electrical wires, so, like animals, we have to defecate; it is normal".


If I tried to suggest, for example, about vesiculitis, prostatitis, or funiculitis, he threw up eyes on me, and whined floutingly: Qu'est-ce que c'est? Je ne connais telle maladie. (What is it? I am not familiar with such a disease).


Having assumed that I do not pronounce correctly these words, I wrote them on a piece of paper, but doctor Pharand continued to pull faces and to pose himself like a clown.


Several times I wrote the word "prostatitis" on a piece of paper, in printing letters, and once even printed this word by my printer, but doctor Pharand all the same pulled faces, and claimed that "he is not familiar" with such a word or term.


When once I asked him directly: "What, in Canada, UTI and prostatitis are not recognized as illnesses and are not treated?" - he made of everything light, began to laugh and to joke, and gave the conversation another turn.


He could declare on my complaint to pain: "And what is pain? How do you define it? Here I will pinch you, and you will tell me, it is aching or not".


So he carped at each my word, trying to make a round idiot of me.


If I complained of groin or bladder pain, he answered that there is "nothing that can ache", that there are supposedly "no organs". (Exactly as doctor Pushie "at the second stage" (i.e. after her attitude towards me have changed).


When I reminded him that there is a ureter and a seed strand, and other organs, he reacted so: "And what is it?".


It is hard to understand how I could not see that he frankly scoffs over me and mocks me. Probably, I could not believe in any way that it is possible in such a "civilized" country as Canada, and, besides, such doctors as Dr. Krasny, Dr. Z"ast (Zhast), or Dr. Rohan, or even Dr. Wanda Brzezinska, with their European schooling and education (despite all their failures and controversial conduct) - created for me an idealistic idea of what is possible and that is noy possible in Canada. Therefore, I turned a deaf ear to a demonstrative lampooning of Dr. Pharan.


An appointment slip ("coupon") of one of rendezvous with Dr. Daniel Pharand. In winter-spring season 2004 I saw Dr. Pharand on January 19 and on March 22.


Dr. Daniel Pharand himself imposed the style and language of talk; he used to begin an appointment in French, and finished it in English. He obviously distorted his English to confuse me even more.


Having noticed that - while I speak fluently both languages (English - at the level of native language), but I am lost when switching from one language to another, - he deliberately switched constantly from English into French, and back. He was a French-speaking person, but he spoke English much better than many of his Francophone colleagues, and yet he maintained a conversation with me simultaneously in two languages, setting up transitions so to mock on me even more.


He permanently hinted that I am a simulator (malingerer), and called in question any complaint or assumption.


During 3-rd or 4-th meeting with Dr. Pharand, when, in response to his mockeries and pointed mistrust, I said that - in this case - I will find myself another doctor, he suddenly sharply changed his behavior, and began to swear that all his unethical notes, mockeries and sneers: all that were just "jokes".


From that very minute he began to treat me "seriously" and friendly, with sympathy, attentively listening to my complaints; he even admitted-received me without a booked appointment (in case of need), and imitated sympathy and empathy. Why he wanted to retain me among his patients; why he needed me? Maybe, his conscience has wakened? Or he was "afraid" that I can file a complaint? Come on! Doctors in Canada (and in North America in general) enjoy their complete and borderless impunity, and, secondly, Dr. Pharand was aware of my socioeconomic status and marginalization, and perfectly knew that I am not a threat to him. Besides, he could see that I am not a type of person to turn to a medical lawyer. So, he had nothing to be afraid of.


He was just afraid to miss an opportunity of further mockeries and harm to his patient. For this reason, he changed his behavior. He became charming, polite, and all swore sympathy.


In practice, he continued his sabotage. For 3 months, he refused me tests, necessary from my point of view. When he - after all - directed me to one of these tests, the result "was missing".


On the wave of his false empathy, Dr. Pharand managed to force me to sign a consent for cystoscopy (which is equated to an operative-surgical procedure by its invasiveness (February, 2004). (He threatened that, if I reject this procedure, there will be no other tests and exams, no diagnosis and no treatment.) This, probably, was his intention, and for this goal he changed his behavior.


It is possible to imagine my state and condition, and suffering - if I agreed to this barbaric procedure, which should be considered only as a last resort. See below: the requisition for cystoscopy, signed by Dr. Pharan.


The requisition for cystoscopy from doctor Daniel Pharand"s office. (See above).


It is absolutely clear that - in my case - there was no need in it. It was possible to manage my case easily by administrating Cipro, frequent urine tests in different laboratories (if my tests have disappeared and reports looked suspicious), ultrasound, and cytology.


The cystoscopy became a real disaster (February 3, 2004). I have no doubts that Dr. Pharand perfectly knew about its outcome, because he knew that - at the time of a urological infection - cystoscopy is contraindicated or must be provided in combination with a course of antibiotics.


I believe that the cystoscopy caused an acute and very serious infection and provoked a quite expected allergic response. The torture lasted 2 weeks, and exceeded everything that I suffered from starting January, 2001.


In my condition, I could not go to Emergency, but also could not call Ambulance for a number of reasons.


I contacted Dr. Pharand"s office, and his frightened secretary called him to the phone. He answered to my groans and complaints that I am exaggerating and that "it is necessary to be a man"!


4 days later I - after all - went to (old) Royal Victoria ER, staying there 12 hours (!), but was not examined by doctor. I managed to get antibiotics via Internet (unfortunately, not Cipro or equally efficient antibiotics), and the acute infection receded, but, since then, my condition became 250 times worse. If - before the cystoscopy - I was ill, say, at 10 percent, after it I became 200 percent ill. All former problems have aggravated. Complications from cystoscopy of 2004 became a real drama, and provoked all further sharp deteriorations, which led to the catastrophe of 2016, and provoked 2 surgeries and all dreadful events around them. Among those complications there were stricture, canal stenosis, and prostate-side passage obstruction. And Dr. Pharand said that "nothing suspicious was found". Then, having come to the office of Dr. Pharand after all these tortures and ordeals (in which he was guilty), I did not find any regret or apology from him at all, any intention to administrate, at last, any treatment or supplementary diagnostic procedures. He, perfectly knowing, that an antibiotic therapy is urgently needed, coldly (not with a sneer, like before, but, like a saturated snake) refused to prescribe antibiotics.


When I asked to administrate empirically ("if "nothing" was found") 3 courses of antibiotics: antibacterial urological of broad spectrum of activity; specific against expected chronic prostatitis (supposedly, Enterococci); and also a "target" course, in connection with the "urological arthritis" (by then, I did not know about Reuters syndrome or other urological-related arthritis yet), Dr. Pharand told that, as the most recent - "the most exact and objective" - procedure found "absolutely no deviations from the norm", he considers the prescription of antibiotics inexpedient.


When I asked him what to do with the fact that I have hematuria and dysuria, micturition and urgency, itching and burning in the most acute form - doctor Pharand answered that can do nothing about it.


Then I decided not to visit him anymore, and ceased to book appointments with him.


In 2004, I received a copy of cystoscopy"s report in the medical archive of Hotel Dieu Hospital, but found there only confirmation on passing the procedure, and no conclusions, no report, no result, no findings!


I did not receive the operational official report as well. I was told that my chart from Dr. Pharand"s office is not in the medical archive "yet". But it was absent in the medical archive in 2005, 2006, and 2007 as well. I put myself at risk, suffered from cystoscopy"s immediate side effects (a real torture!), from long side effects, and from its complications (which were irreversible!) in vain! This cystoscopy's medical report has vanished!


Later, I learned that - in his medical formulary written statement - Dr. Pharand pretended, as if I was not in due time, and, since then - he stopped being seeing his patient. But, actually, I ceased to see him (i.e. to book appointments with him) only after the 1-st appointment with him after the cystoscopy i.e. after he said that "nothing "suspicious" was found. Thus, I did not miss ANY appointment with Dr. Pharand, and he - in his official report claimed as if I "did not attend" that exact appointment. Another outraged fact: In the copy of cystoscopy"s report, which I received from the medical archive in 2004, nothing was told about any abnormalities or pathologies, but, when - in 2012 - I repeatedly obtained a copy of the report of the same procedure, it was a different report, which stated that the cystoscopy (February 3, 2004) revealed abnormal transitional cells (abnormal transitional cells are these cells, which cover the epithelium of kidneys, ureters, urinary bladder, and other organs of the urinary tract).


See this report below.


The cystoscopy"s (from 3 February 2004) official report, received only in 2012 and being absent in 2004-2012.


By the end of 2003, moderate BPE, steady micro-hematuria and other blood presence was noticed, in addition to other complications (just some of which were listed above). But AFTER the cystoscopy with its irreversible complications, in 2005-2006, there were already - bigger than moderate BPE, interruption, insignificant bladder"s drainage, and a number of other additional problems. My quality of life degraded rapidly and irreversibly.


Somewhere towards the end of 2004, when I still lived on Aylmer, near Sherbrook, I crossed once Milton Street - and was "not fatally" hit by a car, which stopped on the "STOP" sign.


The car stood there, "dancing". The driver slightly shook the car: back and forth, back and forth, listening to loud music. Even a "small" blow from this car left a severe bruise at the left leg.


Shortly before moving from student's McGill-"Ghetto" to Pointe-St-Charles (end of 2005), I was hit by another car - always at the same corner of Milton and Aylmer, when I was going back home from Dépanneur. This driver not only hit me, but also shouted at me, accusing of deliberately crossing the street at a slow speed and playing on the driver's nerves. He hit me intentionally, having punished me for an alleged action, which had no relation to how I crossed the street. The driver masterly pulled the car - extremely precisely - to hit me only slightly, without having broken bones, - but I felt pain from a bruise more than 2 months.


The same driver was involved later in incidents of 2006 and 2008 (see below).


There are no doubts that such a blow with an astonishing precision and masterly performed by the car so that should not break victim"s bones, requires a special experience and training.


And, if two drivers - during rather a short time lapse - showed such special skills on me: it cannot be a "mere coincidence".


From February (after cystoscopy) to June 2004, the longest acute UTI was devastating my existence, while all my "permanent" (by then) doctors were denying antibiotics.


Only on June 17, 2004, an "occasional" doctor (Dr. Gerald A. Sohmer) prescribed Racio Clindomycin, which stopped the acute infection and forced hematuria and other presence of blood to disappear. Dr. Sohmer has manifested real compassion, while doctors Piche, Puchie, Zast, Pharand, and Rohan, and 3 other doctors, who trusted the government, not their patient, doubted the objectivity of mine complains, and picked up the bias from the governmental sources, had no compassion and no will to end my suffering.


I do believe that the modern governments, with all their computerized technologies and scientific oppression tools, are able to brainwash and to incline - for a short period - even such responsible and companionate doctors, like the above mentioned doctors. We can only guess - how the government managed to indoctrinate them and to dispose them against me, but the effect of administrative and psychological influence on doctors was obvious.


Their prejudgment had the same source; it was undeniable, because they were using same words and same reasoning to justify their actions.


For example, all 8 doctors often reacted to mine complains about acute UTI and the most drastic manifestations of the urological problems by saying word for word (verbatim): "We, doctors, believe in science and scientific objectivity. The lab tests found nothing, this is objective. And your perceptions are subjective. Even pain may have resulted from anxiety".


When I used to obtain lab tests from medical archives, I sometimes saw that doctors were not telling the truth. I saw innumerous "flags" (which mark abnormalities), including the presence of blood, mucus, proteins, etc. in urine; "unhealthy" color and abnormal specific gravity; elevated leucocytes and presence of blood (the most reliable sign of infection); and other signals of a serious urological disease. And all this anticipated a big amount of suffering.


And, when asking any doctor about lab tests findings, I used to receive a response: "Everything is excellent. No reasons to worry". Such a response I received even if in the lab test report it was marked: "Urinal tract infection".


Another example is their identical and very bizarre reaction to the requests to see one or another lab test result-report. All of them pretended to be surprised, and asked word for word: "Did I send you for this test?". When I responded affirmatively, their response could vary from "I don"t remember and don"t believe that I sent you for this test", to "Did you went to do this test?".


There were other similar cases. For example, Dr. Pushie used to say many times exactly as Dr. Pharand: "What can hurt there? No pain can come from this part of your body. There is nothing that can ache there!".


An appointment card of Dr. Pushie signed by her (see above).


However, this happened during the period, when she lost an interest in helping me. During other periods, Dr. Pushie not only honesty fulfilled her medical duties, but also showed a genuine interest in my health problems' solution, including the urological problems, having referred me to a urologist. (However, my appointment with the urologist was sabotaged).


Unlike obviously unethical and unusually cruel acts committed by doctors like Dr. Pharand, Dr. Morris, or Dr. Rowen, doctors like Dr. Zast, Dr. Rohan, Dr. Piche, Dr. Krasny, Dr. Szego, or Dr. Pushie demonstrated a very contradictive behavior, marked not by situation, particular conversation, or my own conduct, but by time frames. (I don"t take into account their reaction to my written demands or explanations, normally sent by fax, or handed over like a note. Any doctor"s reaction to patient"s written statement would be as a reaction to something bizarre, but most of the ethical doctors manifested only the initial anger, while later understood that these written statements were products of the bizarre attitude towards me by the whole medical system and oppressive persecutions in general).


Their contradictive behavior, divided by time frames is another proof of something beyond the medical sphere and the relationship doctor-patient, which means that it had nothing to do with me or with them.


I can recall several similar events of sudden and inexplicable change of very friendly and good-hearted pharmacists" treatment, who (in an unexpected move) used to block me an access to particular medications. After these incidents, they behaved as naturally friendly as before, seeing that I have no grudge on them. I believe that they were honest and good people. So, they behaved sometimes rude and oppressive just because of some secret or semi-secret (or just not known to the wide public) instructions (like the governmental policy towards antibiotics). It is not known to me if these were instructions about me personally, or common instructions related to specific medications and their combinations, specific policy towards particular category of medications" recipients, or linked to other rules.


But, by analogy, it is justifiably to suggest that doctors are also guided by governments-created stereotypes and rules, a number of which may be hostile and discriminatory towards some of the social, ethnic, political, ideological, professional, and other groups and minorities.


Even the most ethical and conscience doctors are obliged to play by those rules. And, when doctors are placed between a patient and the government, they must always play on government"s side. In the most outraged circumstances (like the events described in other books of this series [concerning crimes committed by the Immigration Medical Services]) they may sometimes go against particular bureaucrats in particular governmental institutions, but in extremely rare and isolated cases.


The governments are always excuse their tyranny and cruelty by "science" and "norms", but their "norms" and "standards" are constantly changing and violated by the governments themselves. In ex-USSR mass-murders of millions of innocent people were a norm. Mass murders and war crimes were a norm under Franco"s dictatorship in Spain, under Hitler in Germany, under Pinochet in Chili. A number of governments (supported, by the way, by Canada and other "democratic" regimes) practice mass murders, tortures, and other crimes right now, and this is (as always) excused by "necessity". For decades, the "science" was declaring no danger from the tobacco industry and from smoking. The Nazi theories in Hitler"s Germany were supported by the most respected scientists. For decades, "in the name of "science", USA and Canada practiced fascist mind control experiments, using horrible tortures like electroshock, LSD, etc., on innocent people. What was science yesterday, is anti-science today, because the science is constantly changing, and the justification of tyranny and oppression by "science" is always contradicting its yesterday's and tomorrow's cover ups...


Events around "the friendly stage" of Dr. Pushie"s treatment, have a special, extremely important meaning in my "medical" epic.


All Dr. Pushie's referrals to medical specialists were sabotaged by hospitals and doctors.


Dr. Pushis"s requisition to a urologist.


These events slightly open a curtain over such deeply hidden and veiled mechanisms that give a unique chance to see my epic in a new light. This is because an adequate medical care - in case with Dr. Pushie - was sabotaged not at the level of the family doctor, but at the level of the access to those specialists to whom I was directed by Dr. Pushie (i.e. to those specialists to whom I unsuccessfully tried to get for many years, when was denied the referrals). Now an access to them was superimposed already at the level of these specialists" secretaries or (if their secretaries acted on their instigation) by doctors-specialists themselves.


The fact that I could not manage to obtain ANY rendezvous to these specialists, despite Dr. Pushie"s written referrals on official medical formularies: is the most scandalous thing.


On mistrust of sceptics I can adduce a special argument.


During all years - from 1994 to 2015 - I used ALL referrals to specialists, which I could obtain from different general doctors, except of one single case (I did not manage to be examined by an "alternative" gastroenterologist at St.-Mary's, because he or his secretary have blocked me an access to an appointment with him).


2 otolaryngologists, gastroenterologist, surgeon, 4 dermatologists, 2 rheumatologists, later - 2 urologists, and several other specialists; till 2015, I visited every specialist, to whom I was sent.


The main problem was that the referrals to specialists were not given to me timely (as well as the requisitions for many tests and analyses), but only after an URGENT need has already passed. Another problem was that some of these specialists just sabotaged the medical help, denying the need of their intervention, and refusing to recognize my health problems or health emergencies.


If I could be examined by a number of specialists timely, and if all these medical specialists would adequately treat my problems, I could be an absolutely healthy person.


CHAPTER 4.


Now, considering this background - whether it was possible to explain why I would not visit specialists on Dr. Pushie"s referrals? Everyone, who will study my history, will understand that it is a nonsense. It is hard to say for what reason Dr. Pushie did me such a favor, and referred me to all these specialists (on my own request): maybe, because this Westmount community clinic had a special policy? But - as improbable it was - it gave me a potential access to dermatologist, gastroenterologist, otolaryngologist, rheumatologist, orthopedist, ophthalmologist, and urologist. And here the most interesting part begins. A mad sabotage of any appointment on Dr. Pushie"s referrals has started instantly, at the level of secretaries, who refused to book any appointment. An only exception was dermatologist, Dr. Beatrice Wang (a top-class doctor). But Dr. Beatrice Wang was already a dermatologist, whom I was visiting for years, starting from the old Royal Victoria Hospital. It was simply a considerable break in my rendezvous with Dr. Wang, and, according to new draconian rules, after a break, a patient was now needed a fresh referral to the same doctor.


The fact that I could book an appointment ONLY to Dr. Wang, whose patient I already was, splashes an additional light to the whole system of medical oppression.


The requisitions on analyses also did not solve any of my problems: because every test, which was administrated by Dr. Pushie within this period (except, if I am not mistaken, of one only) - did not arrive to Doctor"s office...


Unsuccessfully trying to obtain copies of these tests" reports (results) in medical archives and through other doctors, I came to Dr. Pushie, hoping that she will allow me to make copies. But doctor Pushie - just as doctor Piche, and other doctors (except of doctor Rohan, who - after 2005 - trusted me), claimed that she does not have these results, and openly expressed mistrust: as though I did not go to these tests, and I only fool her. I must confess that, in return, I started (in my soul) to have a response mistrust, and even suspected that Dr. Pushie can be an accomplice of laboratories to sabotage my tests (which was a nonsense), and my good relationship with Dr. Pushie ended by then. However, was it my guilt, or the guilt of those, who sabotaged my tests and my appointments with the specialists?


Thus, the blockage of an access to specialists, despite all referrals of Dr. Pushie, and the disappearances of laboratories" tests - have laid the foundation for mutual distrust, which is an illustration to a typical pattern that torpedoed my treatment even by the most human doctors.


After Dr. Pushie"s advert reaction to my request to investigate the vanishing of my lab tests, I could not ask her to help me with the rendezvous to those specialists (to whom she directed me), especially having in mind that - after such a huge "favor" from her - such a request could be just insolence.


During my next meeting with Dr. Pushie, I, nevertheless, brought up this question, but she told that neither she, nor the clinic have nor time, nor resources for such help, and that I shall try to obtain the rendezvous myself. Besides, it happened after the "cooling" of our relationship, and, probably, I addressed to her with this request already too late...


Of course, I am not a doctor, and I do not know, what could be a typical reaction of a doctor, who did an improbable favor to her patient, whom she referred to so many specialists, to which an ordinary patient in Quebec cannot get for years, and he did not visit even a single specialist on this list, but it is possible to assume that all the enthusiasm of a doctor - shall disappear.


And, when the same patient comes - and says that the whole packet of results of his analyses and tests - disappeared (and the doctor cannot remember all the referrals, requisitions, etc., and, it is not excluded, had no time to mention all such requisitions in her official reports): it does not add a mutual trust.


So "the second stage" of my relationship with Dr. Pushie has materialized, sharply different from the "first" stage, because all her attempts to help me through the referrals and tests have failed. Whom she should - logically - blame for this? Herself, the System, or me? How now could she treat such a patient? So, the doctor"s attitude was destroyed from the outside. This is an excellent example of what the governments can do.


After this failure, a denial of many requests, ignoring my demands of medications, a number of my complaints with the description of symptoms and indispositions, etc. - have followed.


And this was a quite natural response of a doctor to what occurred.


However, it cannot explain some wild, odious acts of doctor Pushie at the "second stage", which I am not even going to describe...


But - in the history with doctor Pushie - there was something really contradictory and a little more complex.


So, this doctor gave me a number of the referrals to specialists, which were in the past denied by other therapists ("family" doctors). Among other referrals there was a referral to ophthalmologist. I describe the sabotage of an access to this ophthalmologist in Book 3-1 of this series. (In brief, I touch this subject below).


See above: On reception to doctor Pushie. January 18, 2007.


After that, there were many dramatic events: my mother had a hip fracture; I was attacked by strangers; and - on October 2, 2007 - I was hit by car Quebec 998 PPH.


Concerning hematochemia, Dr. Pushie issued (on January 25, 2005) a referral to gastroenterologist. However, an access to this doctor was also blocked. A different method was used by then to block me an access to this doctor.


It was written by Dr. Pushie"s hand on the referral"s page "June 13, 2005, room E2.53, 9:00".


It was not clear, if that appointment should take place in old or new Royal Victoria hospital.


Doctor Pushie told me to hand over this referral to the registry where they will put a stamp and "explain everything" to me. But, when I handled this document in the registry, I was told there that I will receive a call concerning this referral and this rendezvous, i.e. that I must wait for a call. In which hospital this rendezvous should take place, or with which doctor: nothing was clarified.


During this period, there was a sudden acute vision degradation; my eyes were burning, and everything blurred, and there is nothing surprising that I "did not note" the date of this rendezvous in the upper right corner of the (that happened because of my absent-mindedness multiplied by a temporal serious visual disturbance).


Having come home and having heard (from the secretary) that - concerning this rendezvous - I will receive a call, I shelved the referral, and temporarily generally forgot about it.


But approximately on Thursday (9 June, or on Friday, 10 June 2005), I - by a lucky chance - came across this referral, and began to clarify urgently in what hospital or policlinic I should go, and what its address (because there was only the date and the room number on the referral, but neither address, nor the phone number, nor the name of the hospital). See the copy of this referral below:


In a rush, I called Dr. Pushie's community policlinic. Fortunately, I managed to get through quickly. I dictated all the attributes of this referral to the patient and polite secretary (including the date of the rendezvous and the room number). I had to call back 4 times - because the secretary, probably, was busy with other patients and with other things - meanwhile trying to clarify where and to whom I was directed. But even by the help of the secretary, I managed to clarify nothing.


I remember that - all the time - she tried to obtain from me information to what doctor I was directed, what was this doctor"s surname. But in the line "consultation with..." there were only 2 letters: GI. I dictated this to the patient secretary, having immediately thought that these two letters - mean "gastroenterologist", and it means that there is no name of the doctor there.


I do not remember whether I tried to communicate with doctor Pushie, whether she worked by then (Friday, June 10, 2005). But, if I tried - I did not manage to speak to her.


After my call to the clinic, I also called several hospitals, and there, too, they tried to clarify where I should have come and to what doctor. I received the phone numbers (for booking an appointment) for all gastroenterologists (including Royal Victoria Hospital), whom I called on Friday as well, and even on Monday, but there were no records about my rendezvous or any mentioning of me anywhere.


Later I learned in what hospital I shall go (judging by the room number), but no records about my rendezvous with the gastroenterologist existed there. After some time, I got another referral to gastroenterologist from my most permanent family doctor, and this specialist became - since that moment - my permanent gastroenterologist, to whom I - since 2005 to this day - have no complaints (2016). [Editing my previous version of 2016-2017, I must add that Dr. Szego was a good specialist and a decent man, and everything that he did was ethical, timely, and adequate. It was not his fault that the endoscopy result has completely disappeared, the 1-st colonoscopy"s report was partially lost, and the 2-nd colonoscopy report was completely missing. I had invasive procedures, and suffered from complications in vain... I also suspect that most of other tests were not genuine.]


Other doctors, like Dr. Hammadi and Dr. Tulangdi (and someone from their colleagues, too), used to arrange for me appointments with a specialist gastroenterologist as well. Earlier documents and notes confirm it. But something went wrong with these arranged exams as well, because (according to my notes) - having come to an office where I was brought by the general doctor (by her own hand) and where this gastroenterologist shall inspect me, I waited for him at least an hour, but nobody showed up. Next time - I was told that the doctor is "not here", and they promised to call me about another appointment"s day, but never contacted me. It took place in the old Royal Victoria Hospital.


Another gastroenterologist, doctor Mishkin - whom I visited (concerning a gastrointestinal virus) short-time by the referral of Dr. Wanda Brzezinska (after conflict with her, I could not stay with Dr. Mishkin any more), still in mid-1990-s. Doctor Mishkin, by result of endoscopy, prescribed a course of antibiotics that (for several years) stopped all gastroenterological problems. Then, in 2007 or 2008, another gastroenterologist, Dr. Szego, has arranged a new endoscopy test in the old Royal Victoria Hospital, but the whole result-report, together with the microbiology, was completely missing. I only swallowed the "gut" in vain.


The infinite problems began with the disappearance of that report in spite of the fact that the gastroenterologist (Dr. Szego) was a great doctor and a very nice person, and did everything possible for me. Because of the loss of the endoscopy"s report (and colonoscopy, too (1 partially, 2-nd - the entire report vanished), and also because of (as I read) probable falsification of the microbiology tests in that particular hospital, I was suffering for years from dermatitis with ulcerations - been not able to sit (for months): only to stand or lie... [Years later, another gastroenterologist, also a very good person and an excellent doctor, has administrated an empiric course of antibiotics, and all those problems have disappeared instantly...]


In spite of the referral to otolaryngologist, issued by Dr. Pushie (see below), I could not get to this specialist as well: it was practically impossible to attain a rendezvous with this doctor. I managed (by then) to see another otolaryngologist, an aged doctor, whom I visited sometimes couple years before. And this is just another evidence that the road to specialists was blocked for me on Dr. Pushie's referrals.


See the copy below.


She (among other referrals) issued for me a referral to an ophthalmologist. (See below)


The referral to an ophthalmologist, administrated by Dr. Pushie.


I got this referral (to an ophthalmologist) from Dr. Pushie on January 18, 2007, when began visiting her after a long break again.


During this period, I the right eye was often hurting as if a painful tension did not fall down there. Naturally, I could not measure the intraocular pressure (IOP) myself, and was afraid that it is higher than a norm, which can lead to glaucoma. Remembering that my mother suffered decades from glaucoma, I also got a referral to ophthalmologist from Dr. Pushie. I got this referral from doctor Pushie on January 18, 2007.


Later, having subjected to a revision the majority of my records, and having again reviewed the majority of the medical documents (assembled by me), I can restore the broad picture of what have happened by then.


Having got a referral to an ophthalmologist, I (from the middle of January 2007) began to call the phone (514) 843-1613 (specified in the referral).


My calls were responded by an angry, hostile voice of a 30-40-year-old woman, who was ordering every time "to wait" on the line. And every time, after 25-30 minutes of waiting, I was disconnected.


Only in April 2007, when I called the same number, my call was answered by another - higher and quite friendly - voice belonging to another secretary.


I asked to book me an appointment with the doctor, as soon as possible. However, in spite of the fact that I accurately outlined the situation to this "new" ophthalmologist's secretary, having once again added that I must see the doctor due to an urgency situation, and that I suspect a high IOP, she booked me an appointment only for June 19, 2007.


When I took an interest whether there is an opportunity to register me to a closer date, this secretary told that in the receptions registry I am already registered for this date.


Who and how could book me an appointment for 19 June 2007, if - till April 2007 - I never managed even to talk to another secretary and to dictate this date? (And, the most important, even to tell, who I am, and what is my name).


Moreover, unimaginably that a patient with a referral from another doctor (who never visited this medical specialist before) would receive an appointment without sending the referral by fax in advance.


For the avoidance of any doubt (just in case) I sent the referral by fax, having learned their fax number (514-843-1618) from the "kind" secretary, but forgot to ask about clinic"s address and the office"s (or the room) number.


Shortly before June 19, 2007, I received a phone call from the secretariat, from the phone number (514) 843-1613, and the "first" - spiteful and angry - voice has declared to me that the date of the rendezvous was changed, and that now it is August 23, 2007.


I tried to argue, but it was useless. The "angry" secretary not only shut down any discussion, but even refused to dictate me the address of this ophthalmologist"s office, having mentioned that I "will be called in 2-3 days" "before seeing the doctor" "concerning the address".


At the beginning of August 2007, another (the polite) voice called me from the number (514) 843-1613, and reported that my meeting with the ophthalmologist is rescheduled again - now from August 23, 2007, for June 15, 2008 (!!!).


Of course, I was indignant, having called such a transfer outraged, meaningless, and unacceptable. I also asked whether they reschedule a rendezvous to other patients so many times and for such a long period (for a year!).


Surprisingly, she agreed with me at once, and in couple of seconds found another date - September 14, 2007.


I had an impression that she, reading out from a source the rescheduled date "15 June 2008", was shocked not less than I was.


Because of this stressful situation, I forgot to ask about the clinic"s address once again.


However, on 11 or 12 of September, 2007, the "1st" (unfriendly) secretary called again (not the number 514-843-1613 was highlighted on the telephone"s display now, but a Private Number), having thrown into the tube that, instead of September 14, 2007, I shall come on September 18, 2007, at 8:00 in the morning.


But on September 17, 2007 (again Private Number), she called again, and declared that now the date of my rendezvous will be September 21, 2007.


Then she at once disconnected, without having even informed, in what time I shall come on September 21, 2007.


For this reason, in the morning, September 19, 2007, I called the phone 514-843-1613 again: to learn the exact time of my rendezvous. I was not lucky - because I came across the same spiteful secretary once again, and - as soon as I named the date, - she began to shout at me, claiming that a rendezvous was never appointed to me, and that no one ever called me from this clinic.


Struck, I listed her all dates and time of all assigned by phone appointments, and told her that I did not take them "from my head".


Then she said that I am "not even in the system" - and it, apparently, means that my data was erased from both the computer system, and from paper (as I assume) printouts.


I told her that I talked to her so many times that it is simply impossible that she just don"t remember my voice and my file, but she claimed that she "knows nothing" about my voice, my name, etc.


Having been indignant, I said that, maybe, it was she, who erased my data from the computer network, and promised that I "will not leave it so", and that I will go "to police, to newspapers, everywhere". But (that shocked me even more) she even did not dare to refute my accusations!


She only said that I, "anyway, will prove nothing".


On my announcement that the calls from the phone number 514-8431613 were saved to my phone"s memory, and can be seen on its display-caller, and that the calls" printout of from BELL"s distant exchange will prove that I was receiving multiple calls from this number - she only burst out laughing, and told that the number 514-8431613 is just a general phone, and the incoming calls from this number will not prove that somebody called from the office of doctor Chang (or Chen, Chan, or Chien). [Interestingly, doctor"s name in the referral was, definitely, not Dr. Chan.]


I immediately wrote a complaint addressed to this ophthalmologist, and sent it by fax. In 2006 I decided to keep the audio recordings of all telephone conversations with medical institutions, and started recording them, and now I intentionally listened to the last call from the ophthalmologist"s (Dr. Chen [or Chen, or Chien"s]) secretary: to be sure that I confused nothing.


I never received any response or an apology to my fax.


All other referrals, signed by Dr. Pushie, were sabotaged in the same way by doctors-specialists, or by their secretaries.


After these ordeals with the referrals, there were many dramatic events: my mother had a hip pin fracture; I was attacked by strangers; and (on October 2, 2007) I was hit by the car Quebec 998 PPH.


Nevertheless, on December 3, 2007, I sent another fax to the office of doctor Chen (or Chang, or Chien), having slightly added and modified the initial text. It is significant that I did not receive any response to my repeated complaint.


It is necessary to add one more fact to this narration. Since June 2007, I unsuccessfully tried to find the address and data specified in Dr. Pushie"s referral to this ophthalmologist by means of the Internet, but faced a problem with the search engines, such as Google. By then I captured the monitor"s screen, but those old pictures of the search engines failure ceased to open now. When now I (in the same way as by then) copied the ophthalmologist"s phone number 514-843-1613 to Google"s search window: Google gave out again that NOTHING - according to this information - was found. (See below)


But in my own wide database (2015), where the addresses, phones, and faxes of almost all Montreal"s medical institutions were collected, I managed to find easily (without an effort), which institution stood behind the phone number 514-843-1613 (indicated in Dr. Pushie"s referral). It was the ophthalmologic clinic Royal Victoria Hospital Ophthalmology Clinic, and the doctor was - Dr. Jean Deschênes. The clinic was located at: 687 Pine Avenue West, Room E4.68, Montreal, Quebec, H3A 1A1. (See below)


It is a pity that I had no such a database yet 8 years ago, and I had to rely almost exclusively for the World Web... It is interesting that other search engine - Yahoo - gave the correct answer (to request of ophthalmologist 514-843-16-13):


When I printed in Google"s window the same request, but the phone number digits - without the "dash" between two last groups of digits, Google also gave the correct answer. It seems that in 2007 I could not find the address of this clinic because inattentively treated such "trifles" as joined-up writing of the last 4 digits of a telephone number, and therefore - during this period - usually wrote these digits "16-13", not "1613".


This "puncture" is quite explainable in the context of the constant pressure and never-ending provocations, which keep me in a "suspense mode", and do not allow focusing on "trifles".


And, at last, just for speculation: the spiteful secretary of the ophthalmologic clinic has booked me a rendezvous for 21 September 2007, but on the 20-th of September 2007, I was attacked by 2 strangers, and on October 2, 2007, I was hit by car Quebec 988 PPH.


The same happened to all referrals to specialists, which I got from doctor Pushie. The access to them was blocked for me.


Among other doctors, whom I could not see because of this sabotage, was a urologist. It is very possible that, if an access to this urologist was not blocked for me, the further tremendous urological drama could be prevented. Non-doubtfully, it was a well-coordinated and supervised campaign of sabotage. For the same "inexplicable" reasons, the majority of blood-urine tests, administrated by Dr. Pushie, went missing: more than those, which were arranged by any other doctor (except for Dr. Pharand"s requisitions). I am trying to avoid any speculations, but it is hard not to think that it might occur because Dr. Pushie was the one, who was able to restore my quality of life and bring back my ability to produce valuable creative works, and someone did not want it to happen.


Subjectively, from her point of view, the absence of my visits to specialists looked like my personal failure: laziness or unwillingness to book an appointment, or to go to a medical specialist on the appointment date, or failing to talk nicely to doctors" secretaries, or indiscipline, absent-mindedness, etc. Not excluded (moreover: extremely possibly) that she also interpreted the loss of the lab analyses "imaginary", and suspected that I did not go to do them, or confused something, etc.


From the "height" of a decade, I had several questions and conclusions, which, alas, then did not come to my mind. Why I was able to visit all doctors, to whom was referred by other general doctors, but was denied an access to every one of the medical specialists (except for the dermatologist, Dr. Wang) on Dr. Pushie"s referrals? Why the majority of the lab tests administrated by Dr. Pushie and Dr. Pharand just disappeared somewhere, and only much a smaller number - on orders, for example, of my family doctor (from dozens!), and ANY ordered by doctor Krasny? Not therefore whether doctors, to whom doctor Pushie sent me, most likely, could really help, and there was a high probability that they will make correct diagnosis or diagnoses?


CHAPTER 5.


When, after cystoscopy"s disaster and Dr. Pharand"s unwillingness to cure its complications, I stopped visiting Dr. Pharand, I became a patient of Dr. Asaad El-Hakim, an excellent doctor and a man of exceptional values. Both Dr. Daniel Pharand and Dr. El-Hakim worked in Hôpital Hôtel-Dieu (by then). Unfortunately, Dr. El-Hakim soon "disappeared", and I could not find him any anywhere (i.e. - where he works now). It is true that later I received a letter with his new business card and his new phone number, but I thought that Point-Claire is too far away outside of Montreal. This is why I asked Dr. Pushie about a referral to a urologist. As soon as I discovered that Point-Claire can be reached by regular Montreal buses, I went to Dr. El-Hakim again. Interestingly, NO tests administrated by Dr. El-Hakim ever disappeared. And Dr. Pharand and Dr. El-Hakim were the only doctors, whom I began to see while having no referrals from family doctors.


However, Dr. Pushie could begin a treatment course even without a urologist, because she was a very good specialist herself. The question is only if she was allowed to prescribe such medications as Flomax, Celebrex, special antibiotics, other alpha-blockers, etc.


Judging by questions asked by Dr. Pushie, and on her extensive knowledge in the different fields of medicine, she was an aware specialist, but never read any own assumptions or diagnoses. And so was from the very beginning. Explicit connection between pikes of recurrences of urological problems - and joints" inflammation - provided a clue of the cause of a systemic disease. But, as well as other doctors, doctor Pushie was silent, without offering any explanations to this phenomenon. One of my consultants - a cardiologist from Dagestan, according to the hint of his colleagues in 2011, made the assumption about something similar to the Reuters syndrome.


A number of indications in blood-urine analysis results as though confirmed this guess, especially as the antigen, most characteristic of this general disease, was revealed by one of the blood tests. But this analysis "was lost" later, too. By then, I already had a copy for myself, but, writing this series of medical chronicles, could not find it in my own database any more.


I declared about the links between urological and "arthritis" symptoms - LIKE "urological" arthritis or Reuter"s syndrome - to doctors Rohan, Krasny, Morris, and others repeatedly. But all of them did not react in any way, or waved away, or abruptly denied any possibility of the presence in me of something LIKE the Reuters syndrome.


The rheumatologist, Doctor Krasny - repeatedly categorically said: "You have no Reuter syndrome". When I asked to explain what such confidence is based on, he only waved away.


For example, when once I demanded an answer by what criteria Dr. Krasny excluded the Reuters syndrome (by then, I already thoroughly studied preliminary treatment of this syndrome on medical literature), Dr. Yiri (Ury) of Krasny told - as cut off, - that "it is visible according to the analyses", and did not wish to speak any more on this subject. Next time I told him that is it important to rule out the Reuters syndrome, because it will also provide a number of answers.


It is obvious that arthritis, ophthalmologic problems, damages of skin and mucous membranes, and so on: are complications of another, earlier, infectious disease. In fight against these collateral problems I used a combination of natural and alternative remedies that well helped in the beginning. Elbow and knees pain completely went away. But once the infection returned after overcooling or intake of spicy food (on forgetfulness): the problem of joints returned. The fact that it completely disappeared temporarily, means that no essential pathological changes in joints occurred yet by then.


At the break of 2005-2006, I returned to my former family doctor though sometimes (when that was required by urgency) still visited doctor Pushie - if my former family doctor could not receive me.


During this period an ultrasound scan assumed [BPE] up to 55, and - in 2005 - a single, done not in Montreal, lab analysis found a urological infection (euterococci and something else (see in this book). I had to invest - again - colossal efforts, means, and time to get rid of complications. I continued to look for panacea, a solution, experimented with different natural and alternative remedies, methods and techniques. Approximately, by the end of 2007, all symptoms and inconveniences connected to former problems disappeared. I considered myself temporarily completely recovered.


CHAPTER 6.


2005.


On March 6, 2005, I sent a letter to the office of Medical Records (Medical Records Bureau de Registraire, E1, 42, 687 Avenue des Pins Ouest, Montreal, Quebec H3A 1A1 tel. (514) 843-1605) concerning a long delay of the report or loss of the X-ray from February 15, 2005 (it was an X-Ray scan of the calf of the right leg due to severe pain). In 1990-s - 2006, the result of an X-ray was usually ready on the same day, or - at least - next day, and there passed a month, and no result.


In my letter, it was told that I visited Royal Victoria Hospital"s archive 4 times, and every time they told me that "reviewing" my request, though approximately till 2006 or 2007 - as a rule - practiced (formally or informally) the issue of the requested documents to a patient (who was physically present), as they say, in hand.


Doctors, whom I asked to help in this matter, all refused to give me a helping hand. My family doctor - also - said that he cannot assist me in my attempts to recover this X-Ray.


My experience with other doctors showed a complete uselessness of a search of a medical specialist who is completely disconnected from the "special pressure", since the system (in the police state) does not leave any choice to doctors. If they refuse to cooperate with the authorities, then they will lose their doctor"s license soon. Having faced such doctors, who not just followed Gestapo instructions, but did it with undisguised eagerness, I understood that my family doctor was not the worst representative of his profession. Besides, as professor, member of medical societies and organizations, dean of the most prestigious university (etc.), he was given slightly bigger authority. (Besides - a Slav).


Once again, I will remind that - temporarily - I ceased to visit him, because he did not inform me about an UTI infection - found by the lab analysis on January 8, 2003, - and did not administrated any treatment (see above).


On the other hand, that analysis was unusual and - therefore - could call a confusion: specifying an infection, the official report oddly did not identify it, and, moreover, was incomplete - though there was a remark "see below", while "below" was just a blank space. But he could arrange a repeated test, and to prescribe antibiotics empirically, but he (during the same period) ignored my complaints to pains in the symmetric left and right side down spots, where ureters and seed strands pass. However, unlike other doctors, he behaved more decently. Turning to me, he asked: "You, what, you want me to direct you to ultrasonography?" (as though did not know how the funiculitis or other similar infections are diagnosed!). I almost burst to ask him: "Who is a doctor here?". And this was an astonishing - phenomenal - medical specialist, who could "outdo" at least 5-6 his colleagues-doctors in any field of medicine! Just the guarantees that his encyclopedic knowledge, erudition, and tremendous diagnostic intuition will be used for the sake of my benefits (but not to be put on the shelve) - were not given to me.


At the beginning of 2005, I went to the small town near Montreal, Terrebonne, and - there - did a lab analysis, which revealed enterococci UTI. That very fact that dozens of analyses (done in Montreal) showed "nothing" (besides - a number of them were missing), and only that single one, which was "not expected" to be done in Terrebonne, slipped through an eye of a needle of falsification: eloquently speaks about much.


In the same days, I passed the test at Montreal General Hospital, where, as always, "nothing was found". The test done not in Montreal therefore contradicts the Montreal"s test. Not Montreal"s doctor prescribed a course of antibiotics.


Trying not to lead someone into delusion, I shall recognize that - in case of prostatitis and some other infections - it is not so simple to find a bacterium by means of blood and urine tests, and - according to various data - only a bit more than 10 or 18 percent of tests reflect it. An overwhelming majority of patients, having, for example, prostatitis, are diagnosed only on symptoms - since their analyses never detect the source of infection. So I still "was lucky". But it does not mean that it is impossible to detect an infection, and - in case of frequent acute UTI infections (and frequent tests) - on the contrary - it is IMPOSSIBLE not to detect an infection!


So, noticing that I am aware of - and consider the above mentioned fact, everyone (including me) cannot but consider:


1) the huge number of the analyses (lab tests) done by me (that increases chances of detection of an infection);


2) the incidents of the loss of selected pages of the official lab tests" reports, or vanishing of the whole analyses" results (reports) entirely;


3) a large number of laboratory tests (analyses) administrated during acute urological infections;


4) the fact that sometimes one printout of the same analysis in medical archive, in doctor"s office, or in another place - did not correspond one another (contradicted);


5) that exclusively those several analyses, which doctors outside of Montreal (or doctors of an alternative CLSC system) administrated, have detected both infection, and its agent (particular bacteria: euterococci and enterococci);


6) that even under the law of probability dozens of analyses proceeded in Montreal"s labs and arranged by Montreal"s doctors, had a much bigger chance to detect an infection, than 4-5 "not Montreal"s" tests.


Why ALL "not Montreal" analyses (lab tests) and some of the analyses made in CLSC - "hit the bull's eye" (detected an infection), and any of "Montreal"s" tests - did not?


In the same 2005, a gastroenterologist (not Dr. Szego) found the presence of an infection of Helicobacter Pylori. It is strange that no treatment was administrated though this infection, as we know, can be "cleaned up" by a "cocktail" of antibiotics.


After the course of antibiotics (see above) there came an improvement again, but then the problems restarted. Medications prescribed by another doctor much more improved my situation; however, they treated not the cause of the illness, but only its symptoms (complications).


As I already mentioned, it took me enormous efforts, means and time to get rid of complications though the majority of patients in my case remain lifelong disabled people. I continued to look for panacea, experimented with different natural remedies, methods and techniques. Approximately, by the end of 2007 all symptoms and inconveniences connected to former problems disappeared again.


In 2006, in connection with a suspicion of an infectious endocarditis, I contacted the cardiologist, Dr. Kostiuk. He, as well as all other doctors during this period, did not want to register any diagnosis or a suspicion on the diagnosis anywhere in doctor"s official reports, but, instead, composed a "note" to my family doctor. With Dr. Kostiuk's note, I went to Dr. Pushie, who arranged a blood-urine tests (and, probably, other exams: I don"t remember).


Dr. Pushie then told nothing to me about the results (reports) of these analyses (or did not focus my attention on the detection of the infectious pathogen), did not administrate any treatment, and did not send me anywhere, in connection with the lab report. Only a year later it was clarified that - by then - the Streptococcus bovis/gallolyticus was found. (See below the copy of the test"s report).


What else is extremely important: the streptococcus infection - as well as numerous others - was also "drawn out" precisely at my birthday. (See below)


Streptococcus bovis/gallolyticus.


Considering a huge volume of stock, and in connection with all the worsening health, I don"t have now an opportunity to study the above-stated document "with a magnifying glass", but, if my memory does not mislead me, something seemed for me suspicious in this printout.


It is interesting that in November, 2006, in connection with my request, I received from doctor Pushie a copy of her abstract (anamnesis) on my urological problems.


I began to ask her to issue such a document for Dr. El-Hakim - whom I began to visit after Dr. Pharand in 2005, - but received only a year (or more) later.


Already, I do not remember - whether Dr. Pushie passed to me this anamnesis personally, through her secretary, or it was sent by mail. I can assume that if I would not scan almost all medical documents, then I would not pay attention to its attributes, and would take this anamnesis to the urologist. Thus, only thanks to a coincidence, I found out that it was a statement concerning another patient"s (not mine) medical dossier-chart. Considering a context of all corresponding events, - it is possible that, by means of this "wrong" copy, some provocation was being prepared.


[It is also possible (now I do not remember exactly) that I indeed took this anamnesis to Dr. El-Hakim, but, as a decent person, he did nothing and never denounced this to the authorities.]


It is also possible that someone wanted to "compromise" Dr. Pushie. (See a copy of this document below).


The "incorrect" anamnesis from doctor Pushie's office. Confidential information removed.


The same year (2006) an analysis done outside of Montreal revealed an eleuterococcus infection, and, in this connection, I received a course of antibiotics: again, issued not by Montreal doctor.


In 2007, I saw several doctors concerning an eventual treatment in connection with the Streptococcus bovis. I also demanded to clear up what was its type: 1-st or 2-nd. All doctors, as one, refused the treatment, arguing that the retests did not detect streptococcal infection any more. However, in case of the slightest suspicion on a streptococcus bovis, a course of treatment is MANDATORY and a colonoscopy is MANDATORY.


[The reason for which I do not provide copies of ALL above-mentioned analyses here yet is simple: I do not want "to shine" names and ID-s of those doctors, which, maybe, I"ll have to contact, and whom I still (as it seems to me) can trust in case of emergency.]


Enterococci, euterococci, eleuterococci, and streptococcus bovis: a cunning group of infections, which is directly connected to risk of intestinum (and other sections of the lower intestines) and prostate cancer.


If the streptococcus bovis appears in connection with an infectious endocarditis or a rheumocarditis (in same cases: a temporal and quite often insignificant infectious indisposition, and - in other cases - a devious shock to cardiovascular system, with risk of heart attack or stroke), then enterococci and euterococci are connected to other processes and phenomena of systemic disease. And the bacterium helikobacter pilori is also associated with cellular mutations.


Thus, all doctors, who evaded from a further study (group and type) of these infections (even 1 course of antibiotics in case of enterococci and euterococci-eleuterococcus - is actually a treatment sabotage) and did not prescribe any medications concerning streptococcus bovis, helikobacter pilori, and enterococci (euterococci-eleuterococcus): consciously provoked my further nightmare.


If it is known even to ME that this group of infections is connected to adenomas and polyps, weakening of immunity against human papillomavirus, and growth of connective tissue (fibromyoma at women, new growths in urinary bladder and kidneys, cysts in kidneys and liver, etc.): what to speak about doctors!


If to add the systematic refusal of general doctors to refer me to microbiologist, infectologist, endocrinologist, hematologist, and immunologist; to issue tests for detection of human papillomavirus and its type, Reuters syndrome (to rule out - exclude); to administrate a transrectal prostate scan [later, when the transrectal prostate scan was administrated by my family doctor, by Dr. Szego, and by Dr. Solomon, all medical institutions (like private radiologes and hospitals) sabotaged such test, performing an ordinary ultrasound instead], to order a swab test (microbiology) of inflamed skin, mucous membranes, etc. - the pattern of sabotage gets up in all its latitude.


Just the same conscious offenders are those doctors who completely ignored my request of detection of atypical transit cells (epithelial cells of urinary tract), and even hid from me the results of the tests (like Dr. Pharand).


One of my acquaintances - a medical specialist - assumed (according to my description) that the initial infection, which began in January 2001 with an acute "urological" dermatitis or a dermatosis (passed in 3-5 days) and urological inflammation - was caused by such a rare and specific viruses and bacteria combination that does not present "naturally" and can be skidded only in an artificial way. This combination could provoke and call implementation and reproduction of the rare forms of human papillomavirus, which became the reason of potentially dangerous skin lesions, and, together with it, caused a permanent inflammation of lower intestines (and - as a result - vascular changes in them), urogenital tract and (probably) - prostate.


In the first 1-3 years of the attack of this aggressive infection I shall be referred WITHOUT DELAYS to urologist, infectologist, and immunologist; and a number of additional microbiological, biochemical, histologic, and some other tests should be administrated; and in first 3 years the disease could be defeated.


Having viewed descriptions of a whole row of clinical cases of this sort, I made sure of the actual probability that the hospitals, clinics, and doctors deliberately and intentionally refused to treat the initially skidded urological infection.


A special attention is needed for next considerations:


1) for many years, any infections (or their traces) spread by "natural" ways were not found;

2) the fact that blood tests on PSA (for many years) did not reveal special deviations (the index was always less than 1 or 2 ug\L - whereas the norm vary from 0 to 4): it is an additional pointer that the matter is not in the specific viruses affecting exclusively the urogenital tract.


Moreover, the total "cross-section prostate profile" in all other "parameters" (ferritin, thyroxine, etc.) contained the "healthiest" indexes. And both 2 functions - in the practical way - were working perfectly, if not considering short periods of the most nightmarish pre-operational and post-surgical torments and sufferings in 2016 and 2017.


On the other hand, several ultrasounds have shown notable oscillations of the sizes of this "litmus" organ, with frequent alternations of increases and decreases that can specify flash outs of infection with periodic abscess.


As was already noticed, from 2001 to 2005, my "medical" epic was accompanied by loss and possible falsification of laboratory analyses.


A typical pattern: a doctor administrates blood-urine test: blood test arrives, but the urine report does not.


Another example. A doctor checks - himself in his office - the infection and finds it (January, 2001, Doctor Zhast) acute and major, but the laboratory analysis - on that same day - finds nothing. (The infection was present obviously, with all the colors changes on the detection paper strip).


The third example. At the time of providing and placing the sample, I am writing down an exact type and color of the sample. Later, I compare my notes (on dates) with the report printout: the color, consistence - everything is described in a "diametrically opposite" way.


The fourth example. I study the results (report) of the lab analyses: it appears, all data "are accurately averaged" in purely mathematical way (on each component - clear average values, without a slightest deviation, which can exist only with a virtual robot).


The fifth example. Having 2 requisitions for the same blood-urine test (with all identical checkmarks) from two different doctors, I pass the tests on the same day in 2 different hospitals. The results are stunning. One analysis showed a considerable leukocytosis (sign of presence of blood) and - also slightly raised leukocytosis in blood test (sign of inflammatory process). Another one (done in another hospital"s laboratory) - is showing a hardware norm. The discrepancy is unreally considerable. Which one of them to trust?


The sixth example. Having 2 requisitions for the same blood-urine test (with all identical checkmarks) from two different doctors, I pass the tests on the same day in 2 different hospitals. The results are stunning. One analysis founds a urinal tract infection, and, besides, the presence of biochemical components, typical for infection, while another one (done in another laboratory) shows an unreal "exaggerated" perfect norm.


Meanwhile, none of the dozens lab tests (including the tests, which found an infection), from 2001 to 2005, mentioned a concrete infectious agent.


So proceeded till 2005, when I went to a private laboratory (not in Montreal), where they revealed an infection (euterococci). However, the main infection was not known again. I explain: in 2005, when I received the copy of this test"s report - I did not pay attention that there are missing 1 or 2 pages. Later, on prescription of antibiotics and on specification in the printout of this analysis, it became clear that some other bacteriological infections were detected, but an access to other pages was blocked for me.


On symptoms (again hematuria and so forth), on the remaining page of this test, and on microbiology (euterococci infection), another doctor has prescribed (November 21, 2005) Apo-Oflox, and then the most serious symptoms disappeared (the main thing - hematuria), and the following test did not show either blood, or an infection.


In the same, 2005, a gastroenterologist (as it is already told above) revealed the presence of Helicobacter Pylori infection. It is strange that no treatment was issued about it.


Administrative and police repressions:


1. In 2003-2005, our post box quite often was open.

Students living over us - at one time - often threw empty beer jars and garbage on our balcony, and, when the concierge tried "to deal" with them, a police officer approached him near the dépanneur, and told that these students "work for police".


2. In 2001, small municipal tractors, which clean snow on sidewalks, went directly on me and my mother more than once, and nearly killed us in such places where there was no escape.


3. When - in the building on Aylmer Street (where we lived by then) - Michael (the concierge) was replaced by new concierge [according to rumors: a person working, in the past, for army or for secret services, and, presently, a police informer], a surveillance camera was mounted in the lobby, and this new concierge has prohibited tenants to quit through the back door. Right there one, or another police car began to intercept me at the corner of Milton-Aylmer, or Aylmer-Sherbrook, or just near home. If I managed to quit ("illegally") through the back door (where there was no camera), no patrol car intercepted me in my neighborhood. However, the new concierge somehow learned about my escapes from the camera, and threatened me with "criminal case (!)" and even beating.

He began following me in the street, therein changing his appearance (changing his jacket and cap directly on the run), hiding behind the trees and cars, and using some other professional spy tricks.


4. In 2005, recently "elected" by then (the opposition called his victory a "fraud") mayor Tremblé, protégé of one "pseudo-ethnic" lobby and one foreign state, launched a campaign of pushing out the law-income tenants and even representatives of the middle class from Montreal Downtown. House owners and big landlords got the green light (and special powers of the "state of emergency" (after 9-11 in 2001) to evict illegally (as in Canada, by then, the law did not allow, under some circumstances, to evict people) their tenants.

We and other tenants were threatened, and illegally plundered (within efforts of administration to squeeze out us from the building).

The camera in the lobby was used for spying on residents - to see when they are not home, - and then to execute an illegal search and to damage tenants" property.

A small amount of marijuana was found in two cases in students" apartments, the concierge blackmailed them, and they moved from downtown to other Montreal neighborhoods.

I managed to collect tenants" signatures under a collective letter, putting the need of the camera in the lobby under doubt and protesting the intervention into residents' private life, intrusion into their private apartments, and illegal searches.

However, in our absence, our apartment was searched, and the petition with all signatures was stolen.

The owner of the building has begun a real war against us, destroying our apartment, resorting to damage our personal property, and terrorizing us (me and my wife, and our children) in different ways. The housing board cancelled the hearing of our case, because, allegedly, the landlord has withdrawn his claim against us. However, when I filed a complain against the landlord, the housing board just ignored it!


Still, before the beginning of Harper-Trudeau era, no serious incidents or injuries happened to me.


5. Once again, I will repeat that somewhere towards the end of 2004, when I still lived on Aylmer, near Sherbrook, I crossed once Milton Street, when I was "not fatally" hit by a car, which stopped on the sign "STOP". The car stood there, "dancing". The driver slightly shook the car: back and forth, back and forth, listening to loud music. Even a "small" blow of his car caused a severe bruise to my left leg.

Shortly before moving from student's McGill-"Ghetto" to Pointe-St-Charles (end of 2005), I was hit by another car - again at the same corner of Milton and Aylmer, when was coming back home from Dépanneur. This driver not only hit me, but also shouted at me, accusing of deliberately crossing the street "too slowly" and "playing on his nerves". I felt pain from this new bruise more than 2 months.

The same driver was involved later in separate incidents of 2006 and 2008 (see below).

There are no doubts that such exceptionally precise and masterly performed blow of the pedestrian by a car (not to break his bones), requires special experience and a training. And, if 2 drivers during rather short time-lapse have exercised such exceptionally special skills on me, it could not be "mere coincidence". (It is a pity that the exact and detailed description of these 2 incidents was not saved, apparently, as a result of data loss after an attacks of computer viruses. The digits of the plate license numbers and precise dates, and the full description of the cars: were lost).


6. In April or in March, 2005, I stood in the afternoon on the bus stop, at the corner of Park and Milton, when a motorcycle rushed from outside Milton to the sidewalk. I managed to grasp the motorcyclist, and both of us fell (I was atop). He jumped on his legs and attacked me with his fists, but I jumped into a bus, having evaded from further troubles. Nearly a year after this incident, my right shoulder ached.


7. Living in McGill student's "ghetto", I had a certain influence on McGill University students, and kept a contact with student's radio. Once, at the end of 2005, when I attached a leaflet to a bulletin board in McGill (protesting government's and corporate spying cameras interference in private life), one, allegedly, "local government officer", approached me, and told that I, maybe, "angry" - because of bad housing situation, and in several days we received municipal "logement" in Point-St.-Charles.

They did not leave us a choice, because the magnitude of the terrorist acts and the pressure from the landlord was constantly growing, and life at our present apartment became unbearable. I did not get used to our new neighborhood, and had a palpable nostalgia for Milton Park area, where we lived nearly 11 years. Half a year this forcible change of residence so oppressed me that I did not write even a single line (neither in poetry-prose, nor in the musical composition domain).


8. It is possible that the authorities (Canadian or not: it does not matter ...) knew that I am so attached to this McGill Ghetto neighborhood, and that I have a certain influence in student circles. They could learn it from one person: a former Soviet, then Israeli citizen, who came from Israel and who began to accompany my walks through the city. He persuaded me to learn to ride a bicycle, and - after 54 - I became a good cyclist though at my age, without the previous experience - the bicycle promises many troubles. My successful debut as the cyclist pushed me also on mastering roller skate"s skills though it is even more dangerous.


November 3, 2005, Thursday.


The description of this tremendous event is given separately in the previous books of this series. Let me just remind that on November 3, 2005, in the day of my birth, I was attacked by an unknown remote devise that sends a microwave radiation rays. I had an extreme (inexplicably extreme) vertigo, sudden sharp (and strange) indisposition (as though the earth shook under me), and it became dark in my eyes. Then came vomiting, dizzinesses (extreme vertigo), accompanied by feeling of pressure upon my face or nape, by ringing in my ears, short-time falloff of hearing, and other symptoms.


I lay down, and overslept 2 hours, and, when woke up, all my clothes were wet though it was quite cool in the apartment. Nausea developed from time to time and did not pass 2 more or 3 days. Then - within several months - I had unpleasant feelings in strongly illuminated places or locations, and that was calling a headache. When I was tired, or just by the end of day - the head hurt too. But sudden drop in hearing was the most terrible for me as for musician. Only after several days I connected it to that incident. This sharply arisen and inexplicable indisposition rather quickly passed, so, I did not go immediately to any doctor, but approximately after November 8, 2005, went to Royal Victoria Hospital"s outpatient clinic, where mine complains about headaches, nausea, vertigo, etc. - were ignored, and only the hearing degradation was addressed. I got an appointment with an otolaryngologist, who ordered the hearing test: an audio-test. This test revealed some changes of hearing, but only slightly out of the norm"s boundaries, though till November 2005, I had more delicate ear than most people have.


For more details: read the previous books of this series, books on my vision and hearing drama.


In 2005, this 1-st of 3 similar events (the lightest one) occurred precisely on my birthday. Next similar event occurred on January 7, 2013 (precisely on the day of the Orthodox Christian Christmas). And the 3-rd (and the last one, the most serious) occurred on June 21, 2016 (the date of the beginning of the war against Russia, when, at night, on June 21-22, 1944, the fascist Germany invaded Soviet Union).


And, after the eventual attacks by means of an unknown remote weapon on January 7, 2013 and on June 21, 2016, an open sabotage of medical care, diagnostic procedures (on June 21, 2016 so scandalous that it is already simply "does not climb in any frames"), and treatment followed. There is no explanation of this sabotage, no reasons, except of an eventual cover-up.


2006.


The same driver, who hit me at the corner of Aylmer and Milton (see above), nearly killed me at the corner of Notre Dame Street and Rose de Lima (December, 2006), when I was crossing the street on green light on rolling blades.


I was forced to shirk for avoiding a collision with the car, fell on my back (already at the verge of the sidewalk) and got the bruises. It happened (more precisely) not far from Jeanne-Cotu shop after (to the west) Atwater Street. I did not remember car"s license plate number, but the face of the driver has accurately imprinted in my memory. I found 2 short notes in my records of incidents, since April, 2008, when I was "almost hit by cars" when crossed different streets on green light, and there was always the same car, which part of license plate number I managed to recall.


20 October 2006.


Coming back home (by bicycle) about midnight (or a bit later) from Bord de Lac, I had to pass under the railway bridge, somewhat to the west of the Marche [Market] Atwater. At that very moment, the roaring train above the bike pass blanked off all sounds. There the bicycle lanes break steep down, so, it is not that simple to slow down, and bicyclists always go down at a considerable speed.


And, in the darkness (the lights did not shine, it was a blackout), there was a guy in all black, on the oncoming lane, and, on my lane - his huge black dog. I signaled a call, but, because of the train"s roar, the bell"s rattling sound sank in this noise.


The dog definitely saw me and could catch a call, but the animal"s master, this young Brutus, commanded his dog not to move. It is amazing how I managed to pass them - without having touched them: literally on the edge plinth of this narrow tunnel. The same guy and his dog appeared later, provoking some more similar situations, and once he tried to attack me with a bludgeon and also lashed his dog on me.


.....................


Having arranged audit of the medical documents and my own notes assembled in previous years, I realized that, first, I erratically read the beginning of new UTI aggravation of 2006 in the middle of October (while actually the symptoms "have been drawn" on October 29, 2006, i.e. again almost by day of my birth), and, secondly, Flomax and Dimopan were prescribed not on November 1, 2006, but on January 11, 2006, and, thus, this prescription had no connection to an infection of enterococci, eleuterococcus, or streptococcus bovis.


Flomax and Dimopan, prescribed on January 11, 2006.


Recognizing, such a human error (swaps of 2 digits in my mind), I once again emphasized that it is the most important to me to understand the events and to reach the truth, but not to drag in the facts and data to my prearranged theories.


Summing up the analysis of the "medical" events in 2001 - 2006, it is necessary to emphasize the main sequence:


1. It was impossible in Canada - before 2001 - for enforcement agencies (like Immigration) to use medical tools for political repressions. However, SHORTLY BEFORE September 11, 2001 (which is an evidence that USA, UK, and Canadian authorities ALREADY used the "future" "antiterrorist" legislation, and, if so, knew about approaching 9-11), they started to employ terrorist methods against dissidents. [Otherwise, the authorities would begin to use so-called Immigration Health Services against me and to forge medical documents already in the early nineties.]


2. Threats by immigration officials and doctors affiliated with the Medical Department of Immigration to infect me with a urological infectious disease (almost 1 year prior to terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001).


3. Then: an attempt to put me compulsorily into the infectious diseases unit under the pretext of false (fabricated by Immigration) diagnosis "tuberculosis", and attempts to reject administratively all irrefutable medical proofs that I have no tuberculosis and never had. The forged "tubercular" fluorography then "disappeared". (See the previous books of this series).


4. An urological infection since January 1, 2001: absolutely in the style of the immigration officials adoring signing or sending their negative (fatal, devastating, and tragic for receivers) decisions on main Christian holidays, or on birthday of the receiver. Recurrences (aggravations) of this infection for years ahead regularly in the day of my birth.


5. An absence of any diagnosis or - at least - assumptions - of what must be wrong. When I asked doctors, what illness is this, they never responded. Administrating tests, ultrasounds, etc.: they never mentioned any diagnosis in the requisitions; just a symptom or symptoms. They never named the medical terms for complications: liver and kidneys abnormal indexes; cardiovascular and immunological problems; skin and mucous membranes damage; arthritis connected to UTI infection, etc.


6. Strange and even wild incidents with laboratory tests and diagnostic procedures; loss of analysis" and exams' results (reports) or their parts; concealment of tests" findings, including even those (more correct, FIRST OF ALL), which detected one or other infection, and strange behavior of doctors, who failed to inform me of the detected infection and to prescribe medical treatment.


7. Failures to send me for tests (when needed) and specialists, and to administrate a course of treatment in the periods of the acute stage of the disease and its recurrences, and (in certain cases) prescriptions and referrals with big delay: when the urgency or even feasibility passed.


8. Impossibility to explain medical repressions by publications on Russian Internet of the accounts about my personal medical drama: till 2008, no articles, or wide description of this drama appeared. The first article of this kind appeared after I was hit by car, and was refused medical help and treatment of my injuries (end of 2007 and the beginning of 2008).


9. Dramatic intensification of this medical terrorism from the moment of Harper-Trudeau rule.


There is such a kind of sabotage when someone, who does not wish any result, imitates a tireless and rough activity, but - actually - does not strike a finger in a finger. It is just the case of my medical epic. All uncountable doctors" medical prescriptions half a year or even a year after my request (when a particular prescription, or requisition, or referral to a specialist - was already senseless), etc. - are pure simulation (imitation) of taken actions, but not actions as such.


Thus, still before October 2, 2007, when I was hit by car, and the cover up (by doctors, by police, and by medical institutions) of this incident, and framing of the driver started, and (due to that) I was denied the basic medical help (the treatment of my injuries) and crucial diagnostic procedures (like Double Doppler and Duplex ultrasound of the injured veins), the medical repressions already were well under way...


On August 5-th, 2010, I received a call, and was told that it"s a mistake. However, on the caller ID the name of company Verint has flashed: this is a branch of an Israeli firm that took part in spying devices' installation on Montreal public transport system; Verint and Verison are connected to Israeli Mossad and American CIA.


In my recent works (2010 - 2016), I exposed unethical and totalitarian actions of this technical company.


On the same day, a drone plane with two sparks: green and white - flew along the Lachin canal. This drone came nearer, and was flashing here as well, hanging up over the roof of my house.


On Friday, August 6-th, 2010, the same drone flew against my windows again. At the time, at time of one of its approximations, I suddenly felt light dizziness.


In the last dates of October, 2010, I visited my family doctor, who extended the prescription for blood-pressure controlling pills, and prescribed Azaphenum (which 1-st 2-weeks dose handed over to me in his office without prescription in the previous month).


In November 2010, on my 55-th birthday, we went to Russian restaurant "Bufet" - and in a day or two a new acute UTI infection has burst, combined with serious urological dermatitis.


My family doctor gave me a hydrocortisone bottle without prescription, and, I suppose, noted nothing in my chart.


Since the end of 2004, and before my long remission in 2007, this doctor, I think, did not register - in my case history (in my chart) - my complaints about urological problems; he gave me urological-related medications right in his office, without prescription.


The same happened now with the hydrocortisone.


The small bottle was not sealed, and - visibly - was already in use. For this reason, I began to demand a prescription. He refused it. My requests to refer me to urological and nephrological specialists (and to dermatologist, as well: concerning the terrible urological dermatitis), to an ultrasound, and to blood and urine tests (including microbiology-culture): were rejected, too (except the ultrasonography).


I had no choice, but to go to Emergency Room (ER).


I spent 24 hours in the ER, but was not examined by a doctor.


Then I tried to buy hydrocortisone in few pharmacies without prescription - unsuccessfully. It was a plot, because the pharmacies were surely warned in advance about my arrival. It is absolutely legal and permitted to buy the hydrocortisone at a pharmacy"s counter, but, as it looked, not for me. My close ones also tried to buy the hydrocortisone for me, but each time and in each pharmacy they were told that, allegedly, there are problems with hydrocortisone's supply, and that this medication, allegedly, ended.


So, I had to use what I had.


It helped, but just to certain extend: an additional hydrocortisone was needed.


My family doctor (whom I visited urgently) again refused me the hydrocortisone"s prescription: this time - in an abrupt form.


Then I went to another doctor, who, like my family doctor, handed over to me in his office even a smaller bottle of hydrocortisone, without prescription.


By the way, demanding a requisition for blood-urine test, I told both doctors that the referral for a blood-urine test (with microbiology-culture), and for other procedures, could be the "last" and unique chance to detect the agent of the initial urological infection (which started in 2001 also with similar severe dermatitis). Unfortunately, they both refused my request.


It is absolutely clear that doctors received AN ORDER to refuse me medical help and requisitions for blood-urine tests at this period of UTI's recurrence. I don"t know - how it works, and I don"t want to speculate. However, it is clear that the health care system in Canada (and, probably, in other countries) became a replacement or a supplement of the low enforcement system, a tool of political oppression (just like Hitler"s Gestapo (and SS), and KGB in USSR).


(See - below - the photo of hydrocortisone bottle given to me by my family doctor).


(See copies of my faxes to my family doctor below).


I sent 2 faxes, hoping to convince my family doctor to help me in my desperate situation, but he just ignored them. I am sure that he could do nothing, because WAS ORDERED to ignore my requests and complains.


This untreated acute infection was ruining me till the New Year (2011).


My last chance was to book an appointment with Dr. El-Hakim, the urologist, who worked earlier in Hotel Dieu Hospital, and whose office was now outside of Montreal. However, there were few obstacles.


When I came to Pointe-Clair in November and December 2010, I was confronted by police, and so frightened that traveled back home. Then (later in December, and, maybe, in January) Dr. El-Hakim was ill, and I could not see him.


Since December 2010, there was already a considerable set of indispositions, and, approximately, since the end of January, 2011, the whole bunch of symptoms and syndromes, including hematuria and so forth "gem" - already manifested.


So lasted up to the end of July (!) 2011, when a new laboratory analysis (once again - administrated NOT by a Montreal doctor!) revealed a bacteriological infection (this time entherococci).


Thus, again, ONLY through a non-Montreal doctor I - after all - received a course of antibiotic.


Whether the fact that - in 2005 - the infection was also detected by that one (and only) lab test, which was done on the order of non-Montreal doctor: is accidental?


And whether it is accidental, that - in July, 2011 - the infection was detected by a lab test on the requisition of Pointe-Claire (NON-Montreal) doctor?


About 30 microbiology tests of this type (to detect acute UTI infections), besides the Hotel Dieu Hospital"s and CLSC's Metro, were done in Montreal and on the order of Montreal doctors: and none found any pathology. However, only 3 of such tests, done outside of Montreal, or on the order of non-Montreal"s doctors: detected an infection!


Meanwhile, the indexes of blood tests became more and more alarming; against the background of complete disregard of all serious problems by doctors.


Blood-urine tests on December 14, 2010, shall become an urgent signal, but neither my family doctor, nor other doctors paid absolutely no attention to all abnormal counts, as though "did not attach significance" to the initial stage (for the first time revealed) of so-called pre-diabetes (displayed by this blood test), neither to liver and kidneys function, nor to the abnormal indexes of thyroid gland function...


Even if the deviations were insignificant separately, all together they represented a serious systemic problem, especially considering permanent hematuria, infection, and symptoms-complains.


It is very probable that not accidentally the 2-nd page of this blood-urine test (December 14, 2010) was made inaccessible for me in the medical archive, or through my family doctor. And exactly that page (hidden from me) contained the indexes of endocrinology.


It is understandable from these test's pages (see below) that the long-term hematuria is "successfully continues" (see below), with complete inactivity of doctors, from whom I rarely managed to obtain (with a fierce fight) only antibiotics. In principle, if the antibiotics did not help since 2001 (!!!), and NO diagnosis (!) was made, doctors were obliged to refer me to other tests and exams, to change the treatment tactics (however, there was NO TREATMENT at all), or to administrate consultation with other specialists.


(see the copy of this test below)


On these pages (see above), several indications are the subjects of concern. Due to the long-term hematuria, high bilirubin, and other problems, reflected for years by the hematological indicators, the platelet circle became altered.

So-called platelets relate to MVP, and the abbreviation MPV means "Mean Platelet Volume" (see above).

Platelet, in Russian medical terminology known as thrombocytes: is a component of biological defense and self-healing. Circulating in bloodstream, thrombocytes eliminate damages of epithelium tissue. Covering vital organs, and also connected to the vital functions and life activity of skin tissues, epithelium tissue need to be immediately "repaired" - as soon as there is any damage. And so - the MPV test assumes both the level of thrombocytes, and their normal or abnormal size.

Deviations in the thrombocytes level is a serious problem"s signal, which any doctor has no right to ignore. Thrombocytes level lower than the norm, known in a clinical practice as thrombocytopenia can precede such terrible type of blood cancer as leukemia (failure of bone marrow operation and functions). Due to this problem, not only the ability of wounds healing decreases, but even a trifling scratch can lead to a massive loss of blood - and, respectively, death.


Also on these pages: the "glucose on empty stomach" test (in a popular speech, sugar) - on boundary of the norm - 5.6. So-called "pre-diabetes" can be suspected, or, otherwise, the pathology preceding possible diabetes in an initial stage. Completely ignoring this indication, doctors closed their eyes on it in the same way as completely ignoring the low level of thrombocytes. I know personally a number of people, whose family doctors or other medics prescribed for them medications, when the level of glucose reached 5.6 - 6.5.


Sulfur (serum) creatinine indicator has also continued to decrease.


Formally - at the level of "80" ("78" - is already under the norm): it is considered that kidneys function work normally; however, it is visible from my blood tests how the index of eGFR (serum creatinine) regularly decreased from year to year, and it cannot but specify deteriorations (in the long term) in kidneys function. It means that a long-term infection and its complications gradually injured kidneys; however, doctors did not react to it IN ANY WAY. In any way, doctors also did not react to thyroid gland"s abnormal indexes. (See below: one of the examples).


And, at last, it is reflected in this page (see above) that the level of bilirubin is too high, which was keeping to grow for years, sometimes - in combination with other indicators of liver enzymes, which reflect a pathology in liver function.


A single doctor - specialist-urologist, Dr. El-Hakim - adequately addressed to my problems; he administrated a correct treatment, and has chosen a right tactic.


However, after a very long break, I managed to find his new location years after being his patient at Hôtel Dieu, and (during this time) the aggravation and worsening went already too far.


Besides, the enforcement agencies did innumerous provocations, for not allowing me to visit that wonderful doctor.


Moreover, I had to go to Pointe-Claire from Aylmer Street by 3-5 buses, and, when we moved to PSC - by 3-4 buses. The trip, depending on traffic and other conditions, could take 2 or 3 hours. To take such a trip during acute UTI recurrences, when, happened, it was necessary to run urgently to find a toilet each 20 minutes - was unreal. It happened quite often that the bus did not come to a regular stop, or was late for 15-20 minutes, or generally missed the run. Then - to stand and wait at a bus stop on minus 30-degree frost and through a sharp wind in the winter - it would inevitably lead to a new urological infection recurrence. So, I would not benefit from an appointment, but, the opposite, the result would be devastating. If the bus did not arrive at all, it was necessary to wait 1 hour or even more than 1 hour.


4 or 5 times, at winter, when I came by a "transition" bus (close to St.-Jean) to highway (autoroute) 20, and waited at 411 bus stop, bus drivers ignored me and other people, passed the Saint-Jean - Autorout 20 bus station, and, without stopping, and just rushed away. We were forced to wait 40 or 60 minutes for the next bus, suffering from the chilling frosty temperature. Having frequent UTI infection, I got 2 complications from this frightening experience.


This hardship was a result of political repressions, because the Federal authorities literarily forbade me to work in Canada, especially in my profession, and, also, kept us almost 11 years without ANY citizenship of any country, artificially prolonging our stateless status and sabotaging our immigration procedures, and devastating (by this) our socio-economic status (which became alarmingly pitiful). This is why we could not own a car, and, when, finally, we bought an old "wrecked" cheap Chevrolet, we spent more time repairing than driving it.


In addition, few times some bullying strangers at bus stops, and one aggressive bus driver attempted to initiate provocation, which could lead to serious troubles for me, and only my self-control and, maybe, miraculous contingencies prevented grave consequences. If that happened close to my home, I would feel safer, but, at Dorval and Point-Claire, so far away from home, I was terrified. This is why, instead of taking the bus number 411, I had to take other buses, travelling up to 2 hours, instead of 20-40 minutes by 411.


Thus, 3 main reasons prevented me from regularly remaining a patient of Dr. El-Hackim: 1) police intimidation; 2) poor public transportation between Montreal and "deep" Point-Claire areas, and discrimination + abuse of low-income passengers by the public transportation authorities and some bus drivers; 3) frequent provocations, which could be arranged by the authorities; 4) privation of personal car, due to political repressions and generated by them misery.


Besides, in 2006-2010, it happened many times that the pharmacies refused to give me medications, especially those of Dr. El-Hakim"s prescriptions. More precisely, there was a following. The first medication"s package - a portion - for a month - they delivered without problems, but, when I used to come to take the next monthly bottle, they refused it under different pretexts. No actions or requests (to communicate with doctor), or protests - used to help. I had an understandable hesitation to report this problem to Dr. El-Hakim, who already was doing for me more than all Montreal doctors, all together.


It was not realistic to receive medicines in Dr. El-Hakim"s town pharmacies because of a long journey.


First time Dr. El-Hakim told me about his recommendation to have a surgery: it was, probably, in 2009 or 2010. He told me that he suspects an "outlet" calcification or narrowing, due to a number of infections and abscesses. I was afraid of surgery, and preferred the conservative methods, but not just this consideration forced me to be not favorable for a surgery. Dr. El-Hakim told me that I need a planned surgery, not a randomly organized surgery declared in 1-2 days in advance, when the operation room is free, because it connected to some risks. However, he told me, he is not a member of the Lakeshore Hospital, and has no possibility to perform "a planned surgery". He advised to address to a surgeon-urologist at old Royal Victoria Hospital (who later worked in Montreal General Hospital), but I never managed to get an appointment with this surgeon.


The sabotage of my appointment with this surgeon (see the description of events in 2013) had the very dramatic consequences, which led to 2 (instead of 1) unsuccessful surgeries (which left a number of problems) and to unspeakable torments.


And, at last, I was persuasively intimidated, "grazed", and pressed by police in this particular suburb, and this (in connection with remoteness from home, and in connection with some body-checks of police, which I did not face any more anywhere) forced me to feel a true fear of trips to this doctor, and, as a result, persecution by police brought me (since December, 2011) to Doctor Brian Morris, who practiced in Westmount, near the Vendome Metro station, 25-30 (40?) minutes from my home on foot, or 15 minutes by Metro.


In Pointe-Claire, the frighteningly persuasive shadowing was carried out by local police, whereas stopping, interceptions, and interrogations, and other forcible methods; by Montreal police from Montreal-Downtown (police cars 12-1, 12-3, 12-85, 20-12, 20-3); or police from my own neighborhood (15-9, 15-86, 15-13), which in general shall not appear outside the police district, and, especially: outside Montreal.


Only Dr. El-Hackim ALWAYS (with no exclusions) used to inform me about abnormal results of the lab tests, while Doctor Rohan, Doctor Krasny, Doctor Pushie, and Doctor Piche - sometimes refused to contact me, when an infection was found by lab tests, and Doctor Pharand, Doctor Morris, and other doctors like them, on the contrary, used to conceal viciously such lab tests' reports, which signaled about an infection. Except of Dr. El-Hackim, and 2-3 doctors in walk-in clinics, other doctors not only kept silence about UTI infections, but also refused antibiotics, when I used to learn about the lab test report's infection indication, and demanded the prescription of antibiotics: some of doctors (like Dr. Rohan) - just sometimes, while other doctors (like Dr. Pharand and Dr. Morris): always. The majority of doctors, to whom I personally brought or sent by fax copies of these or other similar lab analyses (with similar abnormal indications) did not comment about abnormal indications in my laboratory tests. They did not inform me about a threat of the initial stage of pre-diabetes; did not state any recommendations; and did not administrate any treatment, tests, or exams concerning multiple abnormal indications (flags) in the lab tests" reports, or in connection with a next infection recurrence.


I, being concerned and anxious at that time most of all about the urological problems, missed the sugar index rapid increase, which reached a boundary point.


And then, when this - next - problem "was only just drawn", it was still possible to fight it effectively. More time passed since the beginning of the boundary glucose (sugar) blood levels - less and less chances remained to turn this pathological process back.


Summing-up the result of long-term tactics of "closing of eyes" by medical doctors on such blood tests" abnormal indications as the bilirubin (VERY different from the norm), and other liver function indicators; the decreasing level of thrombocytes; step-by-step (and permanent) growth of glucose; thyroid gland function abnormal indications; and other abnormalities in the important parameters in laboratory analyses" reports - it is quite valid to call such a tactics an attempt on my life and health.


My family doctor, nevertheless - was a single one or one of the few, who, in spite of all obvious totalitarian taboos and orders, continued to render medical help, despite all his compulsory "retreats" from his personal "ethical code". Only thanks to him I was rescued from many troubles. He managed to prevent dozens of potentially disastrous for my health complications, and, in particular, prescribing Azaphenum, solved by it a number of medical problems. And, in particular, he helped me to treat the blood clots, which have formed in both legs as a result of the injuries when I was hit by car.


ANY doctor from dozens of doctors, to whom I addressed with this problem, except him, did not come to rescue me. Any other doctor did not meet mine requests, and did not receive me in a medical office (in periods of tension) as often as he did.


But even the help of such a wonderful doctor (and person) as Dr. Rohan, meant very little against the background of total sabotage of medical care - if not my own will to live and to be autonomous in functionality. Only thanks to my own improbable persistence, resilience, ingenuity, and refill of knowledge, I managed to survive all these years, and, moreover, to continue working on my creative works. In spite of provocations, attacks, blows by cars and motorcycles, set-up accidents, injuries, and conflicts with doctors and medical institutions - I survived, but any defense comes to an end without help from the outside - sooner or later.


CHAPTER 7.


2007.


Since January, 2007: even more intensive, persuasive and demonstrative police surveillance and escorts of police (and related "civil") cars, STM (Metro) police, and sleuths.


Demonstrative shadowing of STM police, and STM cars' escorts of buses, in which I travelled.


Such a "pointed", demonstrative shadowing never happened since the moment of our arrival in Montreal.


Another incident happened, when, in May 2007, I photographed the church on Courcelle Street, which was set on fire (by, as I suspected, anti-Christian elements (like anti-white Indian activists, or other Satanic cults' adepts), or by the construction mafia; or, by their joint gang).


On Thursday, May 10-th, 2007, a police car, known to me, without a siren ran into the sidewalk, so, that I was forced to make a wild jump for avoiding collision, and strongly stretched a sinew on the left leg. This incident opened itself a number of incidents with falling, collisions and injuries, when I was on rollers, bicycle, or just walked.


Between May 5 and 12, 2007: a (police) car moved down on the sidewalk, and quite could hit me if not my reaction.


On the same day, when - on roller skates - I was coming back home from the other side of the canal Lachine, someone poured oil on my way, and I fell, having seriously injured a hand. Perhaps, I could avoid a trauma if not that incident with the police car, which provoke the Achilles' tendon injury.


In that same day, earlier, 2 police officers called from the street, but did not come to my apartment.


End of May, 2007.


Oil was sprayed on a ramp, which I use to drive to the bicycle paths along the canal. I fell together with my bicycle.


Middle of June, 2007: an administrative lady, in something like a form (blue shirt, black skirt), on black Volkswagen (Quebec 065-MXE) came into our backyard from the narrow pass from the street, and climbed to our balcony.


In July 2007, when I was crossing the Cote-Saint-Catherine street from Lemieux (on green lights), a new expensive car jumped out on red light at high speed, having splashed on my shirt by the car's side mirror, and the driver, a representative female in her 30+, mocked at me, having maliciously leaned out of a window. If I stopped in 5 cm closer to the center of the street, her car could easily break me in flat cake.


At the end of September 2007, I was attacked by two strangers, whom I already met, when rode a bike with Yu. They stuck to us at the corner of Berri and St.-Antoine streets, and I gave a sign to my friend: like, we leave. He did not share my fears, and defiantly refused to move further. Then I left myself, towards Old Port, and, having looked back, saw that those two (age: 30 plus) instantly lost any interest (and left, too). I did not pronounce a word, did not come into contact with them.


At the end of September, they attacked me near the old, put from big stones, railway bridge on Chemin Glen, having blocked my way and having forced me to defend myself. There was a short, but fierce skirmish between us, and I - by miracle - managed to beat off. They looked like homeless.


In several days, the same two chased me near the intersection of Côte-des-Neiges and Sherbrook; I escaped from them in a bus.


And, besides: if I did not hurt my right hand and did not slightly injured the Achilles' tendon as a result of the skirmish, maybe, I would react more adequately, and could avoid consequences of one more serious incident several days later... on October 2-nd, 2007 (Tuesday), when I was hit by a new white car with the license plate number (Quebec) 988-PPH - on my way from my mother (from Lemieux Street, near Côte Ste-Catherine) home.


It happened around 21:10, at the corner of Decarie and Ponsar streets (I moved across Decarie, towards Sherbrook).


Both police and doctors ignored my statement about this incident, denied medical help and police investigation, and provoked grave psychological and physical complications.


[I, unfortunately, or did not remember a make of the car and did not write down, or lost the record. Most likely, it was a Japanese car: Acura, or Hyundai, Toyota, or Mazda.]


(In 2008-2009 I was "not lagged behind" by Toyota Yaris with number 325 VXK Quebec, in which sat - as it seemed to me - a person similar to the driver, who brought me down at the corner of Decarie and Ponsar streets).


_____


[Here I omit the dramatic saga of my serious injuries, outraged sabotage of medical help in St.-Mary's Hospital's ER (which goal was a cover up; the hospital and police did everything possible to shield the driver of (Quebec) 988-PPH car, to distort my testimony statement, for the cost of ignoring my injuries. The whole outraged story of this medical sabotage is described in the book of this series - BOOK 3-1. THE MISTREATMENT OF MY INJURIES. PART 1.]


_____


NOVEMBER, 2007.


In one of the statements to different instances I wrote after New Year (2008):


__________________________


In the end of October, feeling better (to a certain degree) - physically and psychologically - I wrote a report, and came to Police Station N 25 on Decarie (11 of Nov., 2007), to find out:

a) if the driver of the car has reported the accident to police (...), and

b) if my call to 911 was registered somewhere in the police system.


I also took my written statement about the incident to police (...).


In the course of communication with the policemen, the subject of registration of my previous declaration was lost, and I went out of there without any knowledge of this.


However, I found out that the driver did not contact the police, and did not report the incident. I demanded something more than a simple name, and a number (to be sure that my report was registered), but unsuccessfully.


----------------------------------

_______________________


I was able to deliver my written declaration to police only on November 11, 2007, but it is signed by me on October 29-th, 2007 (when it was written).


Here it is necessary to make a very important remark.


For my part, the question - to try to initiate, or not to try to initiate - a criminal case concerning the incident on October 2, 2007 - was followed (for my part) by contradictory motives and intentions.


On one hand, I hoped that the initiation of the criminal procedure will make possible to clear the identity of the driver and to add new details to a conclusion, if this was an accidental or planned event.


On the other hand, being an idealist and, in general, an "other-wordly" person, I took into account also the interests of the driver, who could fall just a victim of his own carelessness or absentmindedness.


Therefore, for my part, a question of justice has interfered into this dilemma.


On the one hand, being not able to estimate independently the fault (and its degree) of the driver, and a presence of randomness or premeditation in his behavior, I did not burn with desire to punish him.


However, the vicious sabotage of medical help by doctors and sabotage of my declaration and blockage of investigation by police made necessary to investigate the motives and interests of policemen and medics to shield the driver, and to cover up the accident.


I was especially outraged by the actions of doctors and triage nurses of St.-Mary's Hospital's ER, who, in a wild manner calling into question the fact of the accident (as though I thought it up!) and even traumatic nature of the blood vessels' damage (at first, trying to negate any presence of the injuries in general, and then - the gravity of the injuries), did everything for repudiating the very fact of the road accident.


This forced me to demand more firmly the police investigation, the more so, that, by denying the very presence of veins injury, and, later, the severity of the traumas, corrupt venal doctors doomed me for unspeakable torments and vascular complications.


If, I argued to myself, I would be successful to receive from police a document, which would unconditionally confirm the fact of the accident, its exact time and place, and, perhaps, the records from surveillance cameras, then, with such a document in hands, I would force doctors (as I thought) to recognize my injuries and to appoint medical treatment.


So a prisoner, beaten on the instructions of the prison administration and not received (according to instructions of the same administration) any treatment in a prison hospital (where the venal medics "do not see" even closely all terrible bruises, contusions, fractures, and other injuries), would try to appeal to prosecutor's office concerning beating, hoping that investigation will force doctors to provide the medical care.


I will add that - at the beginning of November, despite some improvement, - I still was terrified by a prospect to remain for the rest of my life a disabled person with the damaged legs veins, felt severe pains, practically could not go (hardly limped several meters from the car to police station No. 25 to deliver my statement), and did not know what will happen farther with me, if in one way or another not to force doctors to undertake at last a minimal treatment.


It is necessary to notice that my worries and emotional tribulations about it by November 11-th, 2007, were on take-off. This affected my declaration to police, which was written in a nervous, not normal for me, manner.


So, on November 11, 2007, I took this letter to police station No. 25 at the intersection of Van Horn and Decarie streets, the next, as I thought, to the place of the road accident on October, 2, 2007.


The copy of the written statement to Montreal police station number 25, delivered on November 11, 2007, with the certificate of the police officer.


Here is its full text:

_____________________________________


\\

To Montreal Police

From Lev (Leon) GUNIN

[my address and telephone]


DECLARATION

Tuesday, October the 2nd, 2007, around 21:10 (I had no watch on my wrist), I was hit by a new looking white car 988 PPH (Quebec plate), while - with my bicycle - crossing a small street (Saranac) that opens into Decarie.

Before being hit by the car, I was on sidewalk, moving along (on) sidewalk from Chemin Queen-Mary towards Chemin Cote-St.-Luc (South-East).

The car 988 PPH was waiting to make a right turn to Decarie, for southern direction (opposite to my movement).

Before crossing the street, I made a full stop, and then went ahead.

At that moment, column of cars on Decarie still contained 3-4 more vehicles; so, car that hit me still could not make a turn.

With a considerable acceleration and on considerable speed the powerful car suddenly pulled forward, directly at me, leaving no time for escape.

Instinctively, I pushed away the bike, and jumped on car"s hood and windshield, and from there landed on the ground, on my both feet.

It seems to me that seeing me just in front of his car, driver had enough time and room to slam on the brakes, but did not do that. Even after hitting me, he would just run, but was stopped by the traffic on Decarie.

I forced him from his car by shouting at him (his window was open).

He asked me if I"m OK, and I said "No", but he did not investigate if I need help; instead, he justified his actions. According to his words, he never hit anybody before, and did not see me because he was not looking to the right at all. He only looked to the left, watching cars on Decarie.

Obviously, in his own words, he did not pay any attention to potential pedestrians.

The car hit me practically on last inches of the pavement (sidewalk), or very near, while abruptly turning right and cutting the edge.

Instead of an "(" turn, he performed an abrupt "/" turn from where he stopped, placing his car in the tail of the passing column. Such a maneuver, driver's eyes - focused exclusively on the cars on Decarie, - and extreme acceleration: were the causes of the accident.

After expressing his vision about the accident, the driver took his driver"s sit - and left the scene.

My bicycle was damaged, as well as its rear light; a lampion light, attached to the bicycle"s handle-bar (rudder) - broken, and another light, attached to my left arm - lost; my pants also tire apart. Only the helmet survived the accident.

My both legs were injured. I had a calf muscle bruised, with an internal muscle bleeding (an internal hematoma), and veins damage with serious complications.

For 1 month I was not able to walk, and now I"m facing serious chronic complications.

29 October, 2007, Montreal.


__________________________________________


Today, such phrases as "jumped on car's hood", "jumped off", "landed on both legs" - sound a bit inconsistently and ridiculously... I still felt severe pains, and was in such a state, in which it was impossible to write and explain in a harmonious way. However, it does not matter in general, and, it was really unbelievable in 2007 that nobody contacted me or called from police; it was absolutely improbable that (in 2007!) the police completely ignored my declaration-statement. Any one, who lodged a statement with the police, would be, at least, contacted by a police officer.

I sent later 2 faxes to Montreal police, and also called by phone, but, despite the promise that "someone" would contact me in recent days: nobody never contacted me.


Equally absolutely improbable what happened in ER.


And, at last, according to all above mentioned - the accident with the car 988 PPH Quebec, sabotage of medical care against the background of veins injuries, and screening of the driver of the car: it is thinkable and necessary to link this with the further events, which are ideally keeping within the same row. Only much later I connected all points of events, and realized this obvious communication. Really, numerous escorts of police, interceptions, searches, interrogations during my bicycle trips around the city could be - in addition - connected with that bizarre accident on October 2, 2007.


Not therefore whether someone, still without dismissing a potential investigation of what really happened in the evening of October, 2, 2007, gave police a task by all means finding a "compromising evidence" on me - to present me not as a victim, but as a responsible for that accident, even not in the sense of unintentional inattention or ignorance of traffic regulations, but as a malicious and systematic violator, dangerous for drivers and pedestrians.


For this reason, dozens of provocations and stoppings by police were organized.


It was difficult "to catch" me on something illegal, because, despite all my opposition to the domination of foreign interested parties' activity, and to their huge influence on all Canadian policy, including municipal laws, I am ideally law-abiding person, and, besides, expecting police provocations, I try not to violate any rules and not to recede from a law letter.


(Unfortunately, I acted not by rules, when did not get down from the bicycle, crossing Ponsar Street on October 2, 2007 - the first and the last (only!) time since - at 52-year age learned to ride a bicycle, and for 2 years reached a very good level of cycling (except rise uphill); and this improbable coincidence, that is - the fact that I in this one and only time was hit by the car: directs at reflections).


But - at all my law-abidingness and at all my caution - the omnipotent power services could arrange anything (any provocation), not waiting till I would be got on something.


Probably, no matter how sadly to recognize it, I was not detected "in the act" and was not palmed off - during a personal search - let us assume, a false banknote or a stolen flash card - only because Quebec police officers were the most decent people: NOT doctors, NOT musicians, NOT local writers and journalists, and NOT other "humanists".


Just as I was saved from the scandalous political prosecutions of Immigration by representatives of another run-down profession - lawyers (and - by then - yet not rolled out - doctors), while the journalists and other "humanists", having put the tail between their legs, were concerned only about their own skin: also the police officers (and, perhaps, someone in the intelligence agencies) were at the best much.


Therefore, the attempts to fine me for "speeding" (!) on bicycle paths; for disturbances, which I did not make; an attempt to bring me down on the sidewalk by car (or imitation) in August, 2008, in boulevard Pie-IX, and attack of the same driver with a knife in other day: all this can be considered as the continuation of the same line of October 2007 accident, and provocation on purpose to represent me retrospectively as a malicious violator, and the driver of the car, which hit me - nearly an angel against the background of my person.


And here is that interestingly.


If all fault of that driver (who hit me on October 2, 2007) consisted only in the aggressive manner of driving (the blow was sharply strengthened because he accelerated so aggressively) and carelessness, and my injuries were more or less healed (thanks to my own efforts), then what caused all the fuss? Why and who did so strongly cover up the driver, and then 2 or 3 years tried to catch me on something: for disrupting my potential attempt of initiating a criminal case against this driver?


To receive answers to these questions, it is necessary to employ an expensive lawyer, but there is no guarantee that this lawyer will manage to get to the bottom of the truth...


Only in 2017, I heard from two informed people that - among sponsors and doctors of St.-Mary's Hospital - the biggest influence is reserved by Jewish and Christian Zionists, ideological and social racists (who hate needy and poor people, whom they would wish to cut totally from an access to free public healthcare), and convinced ideological reactionaries, supporters of censorship, police repressions and political tyranny.


(This hospital also is under influence and nearly under control of the enormous central Jewish General Hospital, which is situated just one block from St.-Mary's Hospital).


If this all is true, then I, without knowing about it and addressing generally to this hospital, got to the den of those who, for those or other political and ideological motives, could deny me medical care, or even deliberately affect my health.


They could have information on the essence of my refugee (immigration) file, about my statements and views, and about my voters' preferences in Quebec and Federal elections, and that could (potentially) infuriate them.


On November 27, 2007, the post van Quebec, L347766, blocked us the way of departure from my mother's parking lot, having detained us around 40 minutes. At home - traces of search were found.


CHAPTER 8.


2011.


On 26 April, 2011, I was stopped, interrogated, detained for almost 1,5 hours, searched, and illegally fines by police.


SHORT DESCRIPTION


April 26, 2011: during my bicycle riding, the police car 15-9 (suspiciously looking) blocked my way, having unexpectedly come up from darkness and flashing all its lights (having actually blinded me).


2 police officers ordered me to move up from bicycle trays (along the canal) to Jean-Etienne Cartier's park square. I was scared and deeply disturbed by this incident.


I did an attempt to "escape" through the distant areas (if suddenly the patrol car 15-9 makes a detour and appears on rue Notre Dame).


A light-color taxi escorted me on rue St.-Jacques. I continued on foot (moving the bicycle - beside me - for a saddle).


Police car 12-16 with flasher lights and siren sound cut me (intercepted me) at the corner of St.-Antoine, and dashed away.


When I moved to Glen, a car of the STM metro police appeared and overtook me, and an officer, lowering the side window, ordered me to move from the bicycle tray to the sidewalk and to go up (to a place of an eventual arrest - more convenient for police officers?).


The order of police officers to go (in the saddle) up the street (on Glen) - was ignored by me: I continued my movement as a pedestrian: because I was not capable physically to do so. (The street here moves up too stiffly).


Right there, a police car 15-86 - and then - 12-16 (as though it was called from the patrol car 15-86) appeared from under the bridge; both disappeared in the distance behind St.-Jacques.


During my long waiting at the intersection for green light, I was approached by police officers (they came out from the police car 12-16), who stopped me, detained me at this place, holding me there during more than the whole hour, searched me (looking into my pockets and under my clothing), biased interrogating me and fined me for, allegedly, running on bike on the pavement (this was not true).


During the detention and interrogation, the police officers called my home and talked to my daughter and my wife. One of the police officers was a male, another one was a female.


When I asked the male police officer, if I was running my bike on the trottoir (pavement) when they stopped me, he honestly said "no". However, when I asked him, why then they fined me, he kept silence.


In addition, he asked me if I have enemies in the police department (I said "no"), and advised me to "find "the source" of my "troubles with police".


____________

MORE DETAILS


On the 26 of April, 2011, I was intercepted, searched, and interrogated by police.


The police car 12-16 stopped me at the corner of St.-Catherine and Glen around 12.35 a.m., when I was standing on my feet (as a pedestrian, not a bicyclist), waiting on the red lights for green, and holding my bicycle (not sitting on it).


Prior to this, I was walking up from under the bridge, pushing the bicycle beside me...


At the first moment, the police car did not approach, and the two officers - a man and a woman - gave me a sign to stop, and not to cross St.-Catherine.


I was waiting for them half a minute or so, and, when the police car approached me, the police women in the passenger"s seat just asked me, if everything is OK. I responded affirmatively. However, they did not let me go, still blocking my way. After 3 or 5 minutes of silence and hesitation, they finally asked me, who I am, and what I am doing here (the whole conversation was held in French).


I told them that I'm just making "a promenade" before going to bed, but they still were blocking my way.


Only after this, the policewomen demanded an ID.


I asked them - what wrong did I do, and why they're interrogating me. They did not answer my question.


I posed it repeatedly several times, receiving no answer, but, when the policemen left the car, he said that they have stopped me because I am "nervous" and "afraid of the police".


(Later they added that I have "glanced at police car's direction as if was followed").


I disagreed, and said that 1) I am not nervous, and 2) they could not see my emotional state from where they were standing. Then I added that a claim that I'm nervous now, while speaking with them - can not serve as a motive for stopping me before they"re approached.


The policeman was smart, and instantly understood the meaning of my words. He told me that I gave "a suspicious glaze" at the police car, and that it is natural for police to suspend a man who's walking "after 1 in the morning" (actually, it was not later than 12.45).


A hospital card that I gave them as an ID, had no photo, so, they warned - they'll incarcerate me if I can not prove - who I am. In respond, I said that I see no reason for stopping me at the first place, and, as a result, all the consequences will be unlawful.


At this, the policemen said that "any one walking after 1 in the morning" is "a suspect". In disbelieve, I pointed to the street signs, adding that there no announcements of marshal law, or interdiction to walk the streets after darkness...


He gave me a surprising and smart, but an offensive, illegal, and outraged counterargument: that there is no sign about interdiction to cross on red, and still - it is forbidden. Meanwhile, the policeman also searched my pockets, and sled his arms down along my sleeves. Finally, the issue of my ID was solved (I asked the policewomen to speak to my wife on the phone), and I asked if I can go now. They said "no", because, allegedly, I was "cycling" on the pavement ("dans le trotoir"), and they must suspend me, or issue a fine-ticket.


A claim that I was "circulating" on the pavement" was risen just now. Remember, that - when responding to ALL my concerns - they motivated my arrest, interrogation, and search by very different excuses. There is always a well-grounded supposition that our conversation with the police is recorded, and if so: the "tape" will show that it was indeed so.


Before they left, I managed to tell them that I disagree, because I was stopped when standing separately from the bike, and, "avant être arrêté", was walking, pushing the bicycle, not

running it.


I must admit that the policemen spoke politely, without intimidation, or threats, did not interrupt me - even answered (basically) some of my questions.


Writing this document, I want to use it as an opportunity to appreciate this.


However, appreciating, and having a real sympathy towards them*, I can not agree with the fine and non-motivated suspension - interrogation - search - ID verification - record: because the truth (la verite) is that I was not bicycling, but walking, having done nothing wrong. Every police check task of where I am at a given time, what I do and where I am intended to go (as if I am a prisoner!): is a serious and unacceptable intervention into my private life.


Since 2005, I was intercepted, escorted, followed, interrogated, demonstratively surveilled, and sometimes even searched by police hundreds of times, and this is equating to a house arrest.


In addition: the hill up Glen from St.-Jacques to St.-Catherine is so abrupt that not every athlete (in my opinion) will be able to climb it atop a good bike. Obviously, I am not a Supermen. Before suggesting that - regarding my age and health condition - I could reach the top of this climb in the saddle: try it yourself.


The task is much harder if, instead of the road, you're using the pavement (conditions, the bicyclists are aware of...). I am not a sportive type, and, besides, learned bicycling only at age of 53 or 54... I had a very old, overused, and problematic bike with only 1 functioning speed (for the flat road, not "for mountains")**.


When the police stopped me, I was breathing absolutely normally, and spoke without hectically catching the air. One can imagine, how long I would be breathing forcefully, if (under my age-health combination) would finish the climb atop my bike.


Anyway, a suggestion that I am capable to cross on a bike even half a way between St.-Jacques and St.-Catherine - sounds fantastic.


_____________

REMARKS:

_____________


**In the same time, my bicycle corresponded to basic technical conditions, posing no danger for me or those sharing the way.

_____________


See below: the police fine ticket issued on April 26, 2011:


(Confidential information is removed)


It is important to stress that, when the policemen have declared that I was, allegedly, intercepted, stopped, interrogated, held for 1 and a half hours, searched, and fined for "riding on a bike on a sidewalk", I immediately made a statement that I don't agree with that, because I am not guilty, and a claim that I was "riding on a bike on a sidewalk" is not true.


I, also, immediately said to the policemen that their previous statements about my arrest justification are contradicting their last claim that, allegedly, I was stopped because was "riding on a bike on a sidewalk". They interrogated me for approximately 1 hour, putting forward different pretexts for intercepting me (claiming that, allegedly, "every person, who is in the street after midnight is a suspect", or that, allegedly, they stopped me for "nervous glances at police cars", etc.), and only at approximately 1:35 in the morning announced a new untrue motive that was declared in the fine ticket.


They handed this fine ticket to me after 2 o'clock in the morning, not at 0:35 or 0:40. It means that the time, declared in the fine ticket, was forged, and this whole document is a fraud and falsification.


The real reason of the hundreds of police demonstrative surveillance acts, interceptions, interrogations, escorts, peremptory shouts from police cars, etc. - is political persecution, i.e. government's illegal punishment for my view of the world.


A letter with the order to attend a municipal court hearing arrived only after 6 months, which was unusual in 2011, and it is just another proof of illegal and oppressive police intimidation campaign against me.


Unfortunately, when this letter, finally, arrived, my wife and daughter told me nothing, and just paid the fine. I learned about it 8 or 9 years later.


This was one of 5 or 6 illegal police fines, which the policemen issued to me on absurd and deceptive grounds. In exception of the fine from April 2011, all other fine tickets payments were never claimed, and any other letter with a court hearing date concerning these other fines were never submitted to me. It means that all that fines were not real, but constituted just another tool of the intimidation campaign.


Thus, my medical drama must be appreciated as a continuation of the same police oppressive political campaign in KGB style, which goal was to destroy me, destroy my health, destroy my personality, and destroy my creativity.


And medics' claims that I am, allegedly, "exaggerating" my health problems, were like police officers' claims that they, allegedly, systematically intimidate and illegally intercept me "for a reason", or, in other words, the same lie like policemen false claim that they, allegedly, stopped me when I was "riding on a bicycle on a sidewalk".


To show that I did not exaggerate my health problems, I have another argument.


Everything that I could cure by my own methods and treatments, I never put (as a burden) on the medical system. I successfully treated many of my health problems.


In the book of this series, which describes my injures after I was hit by car, there are photos of damaged blood vessels, which display the post-traumatic horror. Boldly denied any medical help concerning the injuries, I was left to heal myself on my own. Using my own methods, I managed to reverse almost all complications, at least, at the foot area.


2 upper photos: 2007, first months after the injuries (the network of the capillaries, blue spots, and traces, left by the hematomas, were visible till 2010); and the lower photo: May, 2011, after a course of my own treatment by my own methodic and natural remedies.


In the last dates of May, 2011, someone tightened a rope on the steps of the iron stairs down from the backdoor (from the balcony terrace), to the backyard; and, if I would not sense the rope by my right leg, I would definitely fall down, and could be killed.


On June 2, 2011, someone, once again, punctured my bicycle"s tire.


At the beginning of June (2011), the concierge neither from that - nor from this - replaced the easel filter in the bathroom; the former one was absolutely normal, almost new (the concierge took it away with himself - as if being afraid that I will install it back). I immediately bought another one, having replaced the state"s filter by the one from the store.


Since July 1, 2011, unexpectedly, there recurred an advanced folliculitis, which began with a rash on both hands: The folliculitis at first appeared on the hand.


Later the folliculitis rash has spread all over the body. The folliculitis yet did not manage "to discharge itself" (I cured it by my own methods) - as (at the end of August, 2011) a serious eczema appeared under the knee:


Eczema - a situation for August 12, 2011. Later the pattern became even more "impressive".


Except eczema, quite a large cyst has formed (spring 2011) at the same spot under the knee (left leg). To the fall of 2012, it completely disappeared - maybe, thanks to my self-treatment, maybe, just "by itself". But by then, since summer of 2011, it disturbed me a lot. I felt this cyst - when sat down, got up, and even when walking.


I had an appointment with my family doctor on July 8, 2011 (9:49), and - then - on August 22 (15:30), and August 31 (15:45) 2011. In vain I begged him and other doctors (concerning eczema) to refer me to dermatologist. My requests did not reach their ears. I was forced to fight this new misfortune - again - by my own means, since the hydrocortisone "on duty" "from the doctor" did not help. My complaints that I am disturbed by the cyst under the left knee also did not receive even a slightest attention.


The skin pathologies continued to erupt in July, August and September - up to October, including dermatitis, dermatosis, eczema, folliculitis, and other misfortunes. I connect this invasion of the dermatological phenomena to the slow aggravation of the chronic urological infection, which was transforming itself in an acute stage UTI. It became an acute UTI already since November 3, 2010 (my birthday, again); simply did not prove in this acute form from the very beginning.


Unlike the majority of recurrences, that time its seriousness has amplified gradually, having expanded for several months.


In addition, the thrombocytes below the norm, and the quantity of the under-growth thrombocytes below the norm: it could promote skin problems, too.


Since February, 2011: regular hematuria, etc.


With the requisition of Dr. Rohan, on July 22, 2011, I underwent an ultrasound. Its report was: any significant changes in the urinary bladder; [BPE] - 50 cm3. This was an already causing serious concerns pathology-hypertrophy.


Since July 23: such symptoms as hematuria and so forth "haemo"; diuresis; micturition; burning; itching; etc.


On July 25, 2011, a test was done, which was administrated by NON-Montreal doctor (doctor Eiley). This test, microbiology-culture found an infection, which agent was Entherococci Faecalie. (See report"s copy below).


Since 2001, the same question haunts: why dozens of urine tests administrated by my permanent Montreal doctors on the peaks of acute UTI-infections NEVER (FOR 15 years!) found ANY virus, but - this urine test, which was ordered by a doctor, who practice outside of Montreal (in one of nearby suburbs) - found infection right away.


New prescription of "Cipro". I did not manage to receive this prescription from any of my permanent doctors (see above).


Moreover, NON-MONTREAL doctor sent me - by fax - a new urine test requisition, having taken care of rechecking the microbiology-culture, in term to verify whether the infection was defeated. Why ANY of my permanent Montreal doctors (Dr. Rohan, Dr. Zast, Dr. Piche, Dr. Pushie, Dr. Pharan, Dr. Morris, and others) NEVER took care to check (by a retest) whether antibiotics helped? Why, when the tests" reports mentioned an infection, but all the details were missing, these doctors NEVER ordered a repeated test? (See above, in the previous narratives).


On August 31, 2011, my family doctor issued a requisition for blood-urine test. Its attributes (see below):


I could never gain an access to a copy of this, done in August, 2011, blood-urine test, neither from my family doctor, nor from St.-Mary's Hospital"s archive. I even addressed to ombudsman, but an access to that blood-ur. test"s report was anyway blocked. It is only possible to imagine what level of sugar (probably) and other abnormal results shall be there that this test's report was blocked on all ports!


On October 9, 2011, Sunday, about 10:00 in the morning, we were driving towards Notre Dame Street from downtown, when - at the intersection of Peel and Rene-Levesque - a new white car (Chevrolet 95711 Rhode Island State (USA), jumped out across to us on red light.


My wife, who was driving, reacted just miraculously, having slowed down literally in few centimeters from Chevrolet rushing at speed.


We went on a limit of the authorized speed, too, and, in case of crash, would be crumpled about flat cake. The driver of the car, who jumped on red light, most likely would not suffer. He stopped the car immediately after his turn behind the intersection (what sense was then to rush on red light!?), on the side of the cathedral (South side), where a black guy of not a high growth was already waited on him. This latter got into the car: at first - to the place of the passenger in front (on the right); then - for some reason, quitted, and changed the sit, going back, on the left side.


Both were wearing identical uniform T-shirts (that day there was a heat, unusual in October), with a text: "Security".


The driver was - high growth, brunette, some exotic blood; European lines in him mixed with some others; such types could be met in South America, in the island states, etc.


The second: was few years younger (25-28), low, black, with regular features.


Any expert will notice the inanity of speeding up right before stopping the car in a place, where someone is waiting for you. It does not make any sense.


Experts will understand - what does is meant the car"s from Rhode Island State (inside which sits a driver in a "security" T-shirt) involvement in an "almost" occurred" road accident.


On November 3, 2011 (again precisely on my birthday!) - was the next urological recurrence.


Wishing not "to strain" my family doctor, whose expertise is too valuable to me, and was "reserved" only for emergency cases during this period, I decided to see other doctors at first. However, other doctors completely ignored my illness, and this continued till the end of November, when, without having found any help by other doctors, on November 30 (14:30), 2011, I got an appointment with my family doctor. But addressing to him also terminated fruitlessly.


He met complaints to urological problems (infection) by readiness whether to prolong (I do not remember precisely), whether to prescribe Azaphenum.


In response to my complains about febricula, weakness, fast fatigue, headaches - he sent for a cervical spine (neck) X-ray, having expressed the assumption that all these symptoms can be related to degradation of the neck vertebra. I expressed doubts, having suggested that - even if there are any deviations there - they are insignificant, and hardly can cause the listed symptoms, but went to do the X-ray.


Here is its result (see below):


___________________


Lev Gunin


THE PUNITIVE HEALTH CARE

[HEALTH CARE AS A REPRESSIVE TOOL]


BOOK 5-3


THE UROLOGICAL DRAMA. PART 3. [Jan. 2012 - Jan. 2014]


CONTENT

Chapter 1.

Chapter 2.

Chapter 3.

Chapter 4.

Chapter 5.

Chapter 6.

Chapter 7.

Chapter 8.


__________


* * *


The whole text of the chronological events and medical documents (under the name of "The Punitive Health Care - (Health Care as a Repressive Tool)" is available for examination only on the basis of the following contract between the author and the reader:


I (THE READER) GIVE MY CONSENT THAT, BY CLICKING CORRESPONDING LINKS AND ACCESSING THE TEXT OF "THE PUNITIVE HEALTH CARE", I AUTOMATICALLY AGREE TO THE FOLLOWING PRELIMINARY CONDITIONS [FOR READING]:


-- I am (at least) 18 years old.


1. I (the reader) is undertaking (commit myself) not to distribute the text of "The Punitive Health Care - (Health Care as a Repressive Tool)" - entirely, or in fragments; not to copy medical documents; and not to share the text and images without author' permission.


2. I (the reader) understand that the confidential information, which is contained in this text, cannot be used for any other [than the reading (extraneous; secondary)] purposes and needs, for any researches, essays, stories, etc.


3. I (the reader) commit myself not to sneer at open ticklish personal information (which sharing was induced by circumstances), not to savor any medical, physiological, or anatomic details, and not to use this text as a reason for mockery and persecution.


4. I (the reader) am warned by the author that, except for a number of obviously immoral (by definition) doctors' and medical staff's actions, other decisions and acts described in this "confession" are not subjected to hasty moral assessment because a) only experts can judge finally about their justification and fairness; b) explanations and vindications of other party are necessary. We also do not know to what degree the doctors were under an influence and direct power of police, Ministry of Immigration, and other enforcement agencies, political organizations, groups and persons - with their own ideological, economic, and propaganda interests, - and to what degree this influence impacted on their diagnostic conclusions and assessments of patient's state of health. Many of the documentary confirmed facts incontestably demonstrate that author's ideological stand (who's opposing to younger generation's transformation into zombie-biorobots with mobile phones on shoulders instead of heads; to electronic totalitarianism with its prison-like total video surveillance; and to the tyrannical political censorship) played nearly a major role in enraging the authorities and triggering the persecutions.


5. I (the reader) am warned that the author sees the main cause of the most dramatic (for him) events in the fact that the enforcement agencies and interested persons and groups managed to present him to the medical community as an individual incapable to evaluate his health condition objectively; as a health-consciousan (or hypochondriac); an extremist; a troublemaker; an individual obsessed with panic and alarm patterns; as a person, who is making unreal demands to the system of medical care - concerning his - allegedly - pseudo-maladies and exaggerated gravity of trivial indispositions. This smear campaign of defamation, scurrilous libel, and wicked calumny made impossible receiving an adequate medical care (and sometimes any medical help at all), and led to health undermining, numerous diseases, incidents, and unnecessary sufferings. Doctors also considered difficult to believe in continuous (not connected with each other) illnesses, with an interval of 4-7 days, sometimes rolling at the same time: as tsunami. They refused to believe in these sequences of illnesses' painful course, danger, and significance. This chronicle disproves such a prejudiced opinion, producing an incontestable evidence.


6. I (the reader) am informed that all negative remarks, characteristics, and facts' assessments belong only to the portrayal of criminal groups, extremists, and carriers of anti-humanistic, racist, and totalitarian ideology, but do not contain groundless generalizations and negative assessment of any country, ethnic group, or religion. The author is categorically against dismantling of any of the existing states, and against restrictions of the rights of religious congregations of any faith.


7. I (the reader) am informed that this edition partially presents the previous 2017 edition without any changes, and, thus, may not correspond to later view and opinions.


8. I (the English reader) am informed that some parts of the following English text of "The Punitive Health Care" - were translated from Polish, Russian, or French originals, and may contain primitive language, double interpretation, or puzzled meaning. Such confusing fragments should be compared with their originals in Polish and Russian languages (author's native languages) [2016-2017]; all controversial points must be resolved through such a comparison.


9. In the very last moment of this edition's make-up (April 2023), the author came across a description of so-called Havana-syndrome, and found same symptoms and complications, which he experienced when was attacked by an unknown remote weapon (3 Nov. 2005, 7 Jan. 2013, and 21 June 2016), and developed symptoms of post-microwave irradiation.


_________


CHAPTER 1.


2012.


On January 11, 2012, I saw my family doctor (11:00).


The doctor did not comment on complains about the recurred liver pains, about pain in the bottom of the throat (where the phonatory bands are located), and the reappeared vascular problems.


In March, 2012: next acute urological infection.


Already from the first half of March, 2012 - pain in case of "both" functions, hematuria and so forth "haemo", burning, gripes, gastrointestinal bleedings, dysuria, micturition, urgency, frequency, and so on.


At the same time - the lab test (March 26, 2012) did not reveal any traces of blood (even micro-hematuria); plus, the test for microbiology-culture was negative.


How can it be possible - in case of the regular (visual; seen by bare eyes!) hematuria?!


In April, 2012 - still hematuria and so forth "haemo".


I did attempts to treat this illness by natural remedies and by riding bicycle (though the majority of medical sources do not recommend it in such cases, but it helped me).


It seemed that the current attack of this infection has choked.


However, everything was ruined by an invasion of another, not medical, problem.


At night of April 19, 2012, 2 criminals took away my bicycle from me.


This incident was obviously planned, did not happened without the police involvement, had a hidden coordinator, and considered the features of my individual psychology. (The details are described in another series of materials - about police intimidation, provocations, and attacks).


Having deprived of the bicycle, I was deprived of my single "trainer" and vehicle.


It was a very old bicycle (with many problems), which I got accidentally; but with high road performance - on which I, happened, did up to 50-60 km a day. From the southern coast of the river of St. Lawrence I went often to Northern Montreal, on Boulevard Gouin (the opposite side of the island of Montreal), or from the Old Port to Lachine, etc.


With my extremely limited resources, I did not manage "to get" or buy a normal "road" bicycle, and I still "was lucky" that had a chance to buy a relatively non-expensive heavy "mountain" bike: very low, with smaller and "thicker" wheels. This model appeared more lightweight and quicker than the majority of bicycles of this type. I could reach (sometimes) Lachine, or, to the opposite side, the park La Fontaine, or - along Rene-Levesque - to Amherst further. I went to the Old City of Montreal enough often - this is not far from my home.


However, nearly one and a half years passed, in my opinion, until I found just ANY bike, which was more or less affordable. Before this changeover, I bought another bicycle, in Kostko, but they intentionally palmed off on me a faulty bicycle, photographed me at the time of purchase, etc. This provocation is also described in the mentioned about series.


A very difficult - even for us (who got used to difficulties of this sort) - financial-economic situation, which did not allow to purchase natural panaceas and to continue the treatment by alternative means, stresses (in connection with provocations and persecution), and the stress related to taken away bicycle have aggravated the infection.


My family doctor was more than a month out of the country, than he "to a limit" "was busy in hospitals".


So, I had to visit walk-in clinics, having made sure of complete incompetence of doctors, which worked there at that time. Any promise to let me know if a laboratory test is ready and gave some clues - was not fulfilled. Totally, I did 5 tests by the requisitions from the walk-in clinics. 3 of them disappeared without a trace, 1 - in the graph of the microbiology-culture result - contained a crossed out section.


The most interesting saga happened to the last analysis, from April 18, 2012.


I immediately requested a copy from the medical archive (having filled out the special form). The result shall arrive in 10 days, not later (to the doctor who ordered the test). The office of my family doctor shall suppose to receive a copy in 7 days (for space saving, I omit the details).


When 20 days passed, nobody still reported to me about this lab test's result-report.


I went to the medical archive again - and demanded a copy on hands. 2 workers of the medical archive behaved extremely aggressively. In the presence of my wife, they began to shout at me, to offend me: in spite of the fact that I accused nobody of anything, required nothing, did not raise my voice and showed no rage.


The sense of their screams was as follows.


The results of all patient"s tests, procedures, and exams are, allegedly, the property of medical institutions (of the government), and a patient "has no right to declare rights to them".


I argued, having emphasized, that if I had no right to obtain a copy of an analysis" result-report, then also a procedure of filling out the formularies would not be provided.


I managed to receive a copy of only 1 of 5 blood-urine tests - from March 23, 2012. The test for microbiology-culture did not find any microorganisms.


As for hematuria, this test confirmed it.


Urinalysis, March 23, 2012. (See below).


A day after, my family doctor (I was by him on May 11, 2012, 10:15), at my request, tried to get an access to the result-report of the same lab analysis (April 18, 2012), but unsuccessfully. Sitting at his office, I saw how he was looking at the computer screen in desperation. He was forced to prescribe a course of antibiotics "blindly": that is potentially linked to drop in efficiency.


Concerning the refusal of antibiotics, it must be added (for the following years) that not only blunt-bold refusals, but also cunning prescriptions of non-correct antibiotics, or prescriptions of not the right dose of Cipro and not on right terms' length (for 3, 5 or 7 days only, for fighting an acute and long-lasted infection) contributed to 14-years-long (already in 2014) UT infection, while bringing only short periods of relief and poisoning (in vain!) liver and other organs, and generating potential cellular (genetic) damage and aging acceleration.


By then, the infection began damaging the internal organs (I already had kidney pain, bladder pain, etc.), which was indicated by hematuria as well.


On May 12, 2012, I received (in pharmacy) antibiotic Nitrofurantoin and also Oxibutynin, which were prescribed by my family doctor (for the first time ordered on January 18, 2012).


On May 22, 2012, I received the same medicine for a repeated course, but - on May 17, or 18, 2012, - having been "on walk-in visit" by my family doctor, and having told him that the Nitrofurantoin did absolutely no effect, I asked to change the treatment. The doctor told: "We need to see".


The blood test from May 23, 2012, revealed the boundary indexes of glucose (sugar) in blood again, and again my family doctor and other doctors (to whom I handed up or sent by fax a copy of this blood test) - did not react to the deviations in any way:


Blood test - May 23, 2012. An index of potassium (potash) (see above) - on the verge of hyperkalemia; glucose - 5.9 - on the boundary value, i.e. pre-diabetes; liver enzyme - ALT - is above the norm.


On this page of the same test's (taken on May 23, 2012) report it is visible that the erythrocytes (red blood cells) - are under the norm. It can be caused by permanent bleedings, liver and kidneys problems, thyroid gland and marrow dysfunction. Even a small abnormality of erythrocytes - it is an alarm. But doctors did not react to it in any way. However, even more serious is the combination of erythrocytes below a norm with the abnormal indications of 2 other components of blood count (see above): MPV - percent of erythrocytes in the blood total mass (are lower than the norms), and MO# - is higher than a norm: the raised index of monocytes demonstrates response to persistent infection and (called by it) autoimmune response. This is just next evidence that - in the 1-st queue - doctors were OBLIGED urgently and without delays to bend all efforts around the treatment of urological problems (1-st of all - infection). However, they not only did not think to be engaged, but also ignored my concerns and requests about a referral to urologist, about additional exams and tests (to clarify the contagium (infectious agent); to detect calcification (if present); to check if the prostate is not blocking the "crane" (easel), and to administrate an appropriate - target - treatment.


May 23, 2012. Hematuria is confirmed again. The presence of erythrocytes, leukocytes and mucus were signs of both infections and chronic hematuria, and other pathologies.


How my family doctor reacted to my concern about the glucose level - see below.


Since May 25, 2012 - a repeated extensive hematuria, with bright red blood and discharge of the bright red (dripping) blood within the subsequent 15-20 minutes. (In this case, pictures can not be provided - as a proof - for ethical reasons; however, they are reserved for doctors and (potentially) lawyers).


My wife"s visit to my family doctor (for talking with him), a call from a walk-in clinic, and the fact that doctors had a chance to be convinced that something is systematically wrong with my laboratory tests: all this helped, finally, "to kick out" a "right" antibiotic: Ciprofloxacin, which was given out to me in the pharmacy on May 23, 2012.


See the instruction on Ciprofloxacin - issued in pharmacy together with the medicine - below. The date is also can be seen as well.


Just next day after receiving this antibiotic, I received a number of calls from the pharmacy in an attempt to take it away from me. They demanded that I shell return this medication as soon as possible. I immediately dialed the mobile phone number of my wife, who just happened to be there, and she talked to a pharmacist. He said that, allegedly, this antibiotic is "ineffective". They also demanded that I urgently communicate with my family doctor.


It is easy to interpret it as an attempt to sabotage my recovery, and to boost the infection for destroying my health. It is very likely that, if I had an access to Cipro in 2001 and later, 2-3 courses of antibiotic therapy could prevent my whole urological drama. And here, again, someone wanted not to allow my healing. However, we cannot rash to quick conclusions without the actual data and facts in hand; so, it would remain forever a mystery.


After the weekend (Monday, May, 28, 2012), the pharmacy staff (males and females) started to bombard me by their phone calls again, again insisting on my "obligation" to return the Ciprofloxacin "immediately" (they were saying that, instead of it, they will give me supposedly "more effective" antibiotic). However, when I asked them - what is the name of another antibiotic (which they were planning as a replacement for Cipro), none of them could answer (or did not want to answer) this question.


A male pharmacist asked whether symptoms disappeared, and whether I will have an appointment with my family doctor.


I answered that I shall to see my family doctor next week, and that the secretary shall organize it (that was not true).


Still, he asked whether I want that he should contact my family doctor himself.


I answered vaguely that I am not a medical practitioner and not a pharmacist, and I do not know, whether it is OK to disturb my family doctor. I also expressed an astonishment that a pharmacy is intervening (without having a report about an infectious agent) in doctor's decision.


He told then that, if so, he then will not call my family doctor, but will communicate with me in 4 days.


However, in 1 hour, when I dialed the number of my family doctor"s secretary, she clarified that the pharmacist called my family doctor"s office anyway, and had a "long talk" with the doctor.


What had happened by then, why, and what was the case: it is unknown. I had an intense and difficult period, and, previsioned a stressful inquiry, I changed my mind on speaking to the druggist.


However, even without the knowledge about all the "mysterious" details, it is abundantly clear that this episode represents one of the most bizarre examples of the rough pressure, which the government's agents putted upon my family doctor and upon other ethical doctors, for preventing them from rendering a medical help to me. Any doctor, who was once aggressively confronted by a pharmacy for his (or her) decision to prescribe antibiotics, or another medication, will be offended and terrorized for the rest of his life, being afraid to prescribe antibiotics to marginalized and defenseless patients, and being afraid to provide any medical help to politically persecuted dissidents.


This episode fully explains, why even the most ethically adequate doctors were forced to deny me the most essential medical care, provoking complications for the rest of my life. It is very suggestable that Dr. Zigmund Jast was also violently confronted by someone, and threatened, and warned not to prescribe antibiotics for me, and that triggered my whole urological drama...


I am also sure that good and morally adequate people were working in the pharmacy, and that they would never attack my family doctor for his prescription of antibiotics, if they - and the whole pharmacy as an institution - would not be threatened by the government. It is very likely that they were told to offence doctors, who prescribe antibiotics "too often", or "without a lab test's confirmation of the infection", and so on, and were provided (in advance) by a list of doctors, patients, and cases. After an "avalanche" of similar episodes with other medications (not only antibiotics) and other pharmacies, I have not doubts that the pharmacies are provided by a list of "security risk" patients, whom they must control very strictly, violently and offensively attacking such patients and their doctors on a slightest suspicion of "something".


Only such an offensive governmental policy can explain, why - in so many cases - the pharmacies refused to give me medications prescribed by doctors...


This time, in May, 2012, unlike the previous cases, when antibiotics rather quickly gave a necessary effect, the shifts to the best did not follow. Hematuria and other "haemo" were not defeated after 2 courses of Nitrofurantoin, and 1 Cipro.


The most dangerous and bothering symptoms, nevertheless, disappeared.


Kidneys and other vital organs were saved.


I might have pyelonephritis already, so the antibiotics have prevented the worse outcome anyway.


This case - once again - proves that my family doctor was treating me all these years kindly and favorably, and that some absolutely weird things (complete silence concerning urological infection found by the analysis in 2003; pre-diabetes levels in a number of blood tests since 2010; failures to prescribe antibiotics at time of undisputable urgency; refusal of the anti-inflammatory or of a referrals to specialists; misinformation about any given symptoms, syndromes and indications in the laboratory tests" reports, radiological tests, etc.) - are in a sharp contradiction with his other actions.


A number of his good deeds do not match his sabotage of preliminary treatment of a urological infection and medical and diagnostic measures for liver problems; his ignorance concerning kidneys, thyroid gland, hypo - and hyperkalemia, thrombocytopenia, pre-diabetes, and other syndromes.


Whether it is strange that these medical problems - with the same persistence - were ignored also by all other doctors?! Whether there is no impression that someone outlined for doctors a kind of "white" - forbidden - zones, which they had to avoid by all means? And that they - under some secret game rules - knew about taboos, which they had no right to break? Not therefore whether after - I was hit by car - in fall of 2007, and after 2 ultrasonography in the Emergency Room - concerning the damaged veins: I did not manage to get ANY repeated ultrasound in all the following years?


If it is so, then what would threaten any doctor if he would prescribe for me, for example, Cipro in the very beginning, in January 2001?


Repeatedly - since 2002 - I demanded tests on detection of HPV, but was repeatedly refused. I could make an acetic myself, but it would not response to all questions.


Even my family doctor did not wish or could not order such a test.


In the chronology of my sores, I found a mention that exactly a year ago (March 22 (in 2012) - on one my right hand"s fingers there was a "surrounding eczema" (doctor told so).


On July 1, 2012, "eczema" turned into something like a red dartre (herpes) with sores, so it was necessary see urgently a doctor, who prescribed antibiotics and hormonal salves. (Eczema usually does not disappear for years, and here in 2 weeks already there no traces of it were left).


On June 20, 2012 - I was again in my family doctor"s office.


Among other discussed problems, I mentioned a borderline glucose (sugar) level in blood.


I told that I am worried about such indications as 5.9 and 6.4.


The doctor answered to my concern:


1) 6.4 is supposedly not diabetes and not pre-diabetes yet (a controversial statement);

2) There are no bases for alarm, allegedly, because, taking into account other test"s components, "scientifically" there is nothing to worry about;

and

3) After one test"s showing 6.4 glucose levels, another (later) test indicated a decrease to 5.9.


He did not make any other comments; did not tell that I should lose weight, change the diet, etc.


My assumption that the borderline glucose blood level can be connected to kidney (sometimes lower than 70) and liver dysfunction (since the 2-nd half of 2001 reflected by tests) and that it would be quite good to see a "treatment for liver", he met with silence.


On July 3, 2012 (11:30) - I had to see my family doctor again.


On July 7, 2012 - strange bleeding of hemoszezia, not connected to natural "function".


My complaints to doctors about this came across a strange and inexplicable mistrust.


The cytology done on July 7 - 18, 2012, on the order of Dr. Morris revealed atypical transit cells; it was written in its abstract: "impossible to exclude the first stage of TCC (carcinoma)" [a malignant non-curable (terminal) new growth in transit cells; transit cells are special cells covering the epithelium of kidneys, ureters, urinary bladder, etc.]:


The attributes (which presentation is not needed SO FAR) of this test's requisition, as well as the cytology report (as well as other medical documents) - confirm that from 2001 to 2012 there is NO DIAGNOSIS AT ALL!


Concerning my first visit to doctor Morris, there is a discrepancy in my records. The following is precisely known: I got a referral to Dr. Morris (at my own request) from my family doctor in May, 2011 (see the copy below).


However, I left an opportunity (for myself) to contact Dr. Morris as the last reserve, if police intimidation and the situation-dependent reasons would make completely impossible my visits to Dr. El-Hakim, the urologist in the suburb of Montreal, whose patient I remained for many years. Therefore, I did not begin to call right away to book a rendezvous with Dr. Morris.


I don't remember the past events, but, typically, a new patient must wait for an appointment with a specialist doctor for months, so, probably, when I (after all) contacted Dr. Morris's secretary, an appointment was not booked for me immediately.


Again, concerning my 1-st visit to Dr. Morris, 2 of my notes contain 2 differing notices: 1) that my first visit to Dr. Morris took place before December 2011 (i.e. in the fall of 2011, or, as one-time consultation, even in the summer of 2011), and 2) that I started visiting Dr. Morris since the beginning of 2012.


During my first visit, Dr. Morris received me in his main office, where his desktop with an armchair, and a seat for a patient were visible from the entrance. He made notes (writing them down) of my complaints, without asking any leading questions.


I described (to him) the main bothering symptoms, which turned my life into miserable vegetation: frequency, urgency, permanent hematuria, pain while empting the bladder, nocturia (from time to time), etc.


I told him that hematuria already became chronic, and, apparently, connected to persistent infection of entherococci, and that I assume chronic prostatitis with periodic pr. abscess (determined at least already by fluctuations of its sizes within 40 - 56 cm3, which is a considerable difference), and probably periodic recurrences of infection, affecting the urinary bladder and provoking pyelonephritis, with a danger of further aggravation extending to stones formation in kidneys and urinary bladder, since I assume a trend of crystallization and symptoms of calcifying tendinitis; and I handed over to him a pile of medical documents" copies: blood-urine tests, ultrasounds, etc.


I also asked to renew the prescription of Flomax, Celebrex, Citrate (to prevent the formation of stones), and "the relaxing tablets": everything that my previous urologist has prescribed.


Dr. Morris - at first - refused to take from me any copies of the laboratory tests' results-reports and med. exams in general. When I took an interest - why, I did not explain anything: he answered nothing.


However, when I insisted, he - after all - accepted all copies, except for the copies of those analyses and tests, to which my previous urologist sent me (why?!).


He also refused to renew the medicatins, which were prescribed by Dr. El-Hakim.


Preventing my bewilderment, Dr. Morris told that he knows in that town - the suburb of Montreal - only ONE doctor-urologist: and called the name of this doctor - a Jewish orthodox, who was wearing (during this period) a black skullcap (pile) "kipa" and added that he is a "very good specialist".


Besides him, Dr. Morris told me, I DO NOT KNOW ANY DOCTORS-UROLOGISTS in Point-Claire. It was told in such a way as though Dr. Morris did not recognize his colleague - Dr. El-Hakim - as a legal doctor, despite the fact that Dr. El-Hakim had the same, as Dr. Morris, medical license, a bigger office, much more, than Dr. Morris, patients, and surgical practice. Dr. El-Hackim was also equal to Dr. Morris by his educational and scientific degrees.


Further, I noted that Dr. Morris boycotts the tests, administrated by doctors, whose names suggested that they might be Muslims or Armenians, and also completely ignores a judgment of doctors of such origins.


However, it seemed improbable in Canada (especially, in Quebec), where it is impossible to be a doctor with racism, prejudice, or a tendency of discrimination in his head, and I concluded that it just appeared to be so, especially as among patients of Dr. Morris there were people presumably from Muslim countries, and even one black person.


It is important to emphasize also that Dr. Morris received me in his main office during the first visit to him for the first and for the last time. Further, he received me ONLY in his procedural exam room, without letting me to approach even closely to his office. Often, standing at the table of his secretary, I saw that he brought OTHER patients - at first - to his office, and only by THEN - ALREADY to the exam room. From this alone, it was possible to draw a conclusion that he scornfully treats me, and discriminates me as a "second-rate" patient.


Already during my 2-nd visit, I saw that Dr. Morris basted into rage without a slightest reasonable motive. When he refused to accept and view some copies of the laboratory tests, I sent them to him by fax, and this infuriated him.


On July 11, 2012 (14:30) - I had another appointment with Dr. Morris.


This rendezvous did not solve any problems. Concerning chronic symptoms, I tried to secure his understanding, but did not find common language. This doctor evaded from any comments and from purpose of any following diagnostic and medical procedures. After this visit, which disappointed me even more, I did numerous attempts to leave Dr. Morris - and to become a patient of another urologist, who practice in Montreal (not in the suburbs), but only 5 years later it became obvious that Dr. Morris waged a real war against me in the medical circles all these years, and, manipulating his colleagues and other medical officers, he blocked for me any possibility to become a patient of any other specialist urologist.


It is necessary to add that Dr. Morris was recommended to me by two of my friends, who were patients of this specialist, and who described him as a quick-tempered, extremely vindictive, arrogant, and intolerant to judgment of other people, "spiteful and harmful" person. But as a specialist, they emphasized, he does not have an equal.


Dr. Rohan and Dr. Szego, whom I trusted and whose judgment valued, also put Dr. Morris as a top-class specialist. So, I tried very hard to get along with him, but this became more and more impossible. I tried especially hard to find common language and "get on" with him, as I just had no choice: now I felt more and more insecure to go to Point-Claire, and it was awkward to go back to my former urologist, whom I a kind of formally "betrayed" by moving to Dr. Morris. Moreover, it was unknown whether he would receive me "back", especially that all urologists in Montreal became unavailable for me because of unprecedented intrigues of doctor Morris.


However, before going to Dr. Morris, I tried to explain myself to my former urologist (Dr. El-Hakim), listing my reasons (including the description of police intimidation in Point-Claire), and even asked him what is his opinion about Dr. Morris. Dr. El-Hakim told me (as well as Dr. Rohan and Dr. Szego) that Dr. Morris is a "top class" specialist, and, besides, has much better access to appointments capabilities, medications and therapy for his patients, medical equipment, surgical and diagnostic procedures, and unrestricted access to the operating theatre.


CHAPTER 2.


On July 17, 2012, I went to French hospital, Hotel Dieu medical archive for the sake of one more attempt to recover a result-report of cystoscopy from February 2, 2004, declared "missing" (see below my request in the special request formulary and the exam's report):


The outcome of my request was stunning. It appears that in 2004 there were atypical transit cells (i.e. the cells covering epithelium MPT) (see above).


Atypical transit cells: exam on February 2, 2004. The complete copy of all related documents - see in chronicle of events for 2004.


So, Dr. Pharand not only concealed from me the result of this exam, but then, probably, "took care" of blocking me the access to its copy through the medical archive in 2004-2006 (when I was repeatedly told there that the report is "missing"); he did not administrate any treatment, or further tests and exams, and did not produce any diagnosis. He ignored all tremendous complications from the cystoscopy, and did nothing to ease my horrible suffering, which he personally provoked.


Now, let"s go to the ultrasound - August 3, 2012: presumable increase in BPH (E) - (40), cyst in left kidney - increase from 1.5 cm up to 2.1 cm (see below):


A juicy feature of this abstract ultrasonography: at the very beginning of this official report it is a statement "for a patient with transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder" (in other words: for the patient with especially aggressive form of cancer). For not to be hit by panic, having read such a resume, one need to have strong nerves and a little bit of knowledge (in this field).


Maybe, my enemies would like to see such a development, but so far God was merciful.


Certainly, those someone, who forced doctors to neglect my urological problems (a long-term infection with numerous recurrences in acute form), provoked such an outcome (in addition to the numerous complications destroying my organism).


In August, 2012, dermatological problems became aggravated again. I was seeing Dr. Beatrice Wang, who prescribed Emo-Cort, which quickly helped. (Received in pharmacy on August 25, 2012). Then - "urological"-dermatological inflammation, which was treated by my own methods (from 2 August, 2012).


On September 6, 2012, the laboratory test confirmed - at least - micro-hematuria:


Urinalysis - September 6, 2012. Confirmation of a permanent hematuria.


On September 6 (7), 2012, the abstract-resume of the urine test: micro-hematuria; CPR - 2.48.


Blood test for the same day (September 6, 2012) showed (6-th page) abnormality of serious hematologic indexes. Such deviations could mean - at least - an inflammatory process and other phenomena, which required an urgent medical intervention. However, no response from doctors followed. Whether accidentally I managed to obtain this only and single (only this one) page from the medical archive (see below)? It is only possible to imagine what displayed other pages, if I did not manage to obtain a copy neither from Dr. Rohan, nor in the medical archive?!


The 6-th page of blood test for September 6, 2012 (see above): a single page, which doctors, laboratory, and medical archive allowed me to see.

1) The index of HCT (Haemotocrit) 0.41 - is lower than the norm. This index reveals a percentage of erythrocytes (red blood cells) from the whole blood.

2) Erythrocytes - 4.63 - lower than the norm.

3) MPV - 6.9 - lower than the norm. In other words, thrombocytes are lower than a norm.

The combination of these 3 parameters below a norm can (except even more serious assumptions) to confirm chronic bleeding, such as chronic hematuria. This indicator in my blood tests, which became frequent and then permanent since 2008: it is an alarming sign signaling doctors that the chronic hematuria began to threaten with hematologic problems, and it required an urgent medical intervention. But doctors did not react to these signals and blatantly ignored my concerns about this fundamental problem.


On September 10, 2012, I managed to see my family doctor (around 11:00).


On October 5, 2012, I was insisting on reception to doctor Morris. However, Dr. Morris did not pay any attention to my concerns.


Having exhausted other methods of clearing up the main reasons for indispositions that were hindering (since 2001) my normal life (and also - in connection with gastrointestinal bleedings), I made up my mind to a next desperate step: I insisted on carrying out 2 other invasive procedures: colonoscopy and endoscopy.


Unfortunately, and I went for these procedures in vain, because the colonoscopy (October 22, 2012) did not find anything significant and did not give any answers to any "riddles". Besides, a part of colonoscopy's report was missing even before reaching the office of Dr. Szego. And the endoscopy's report has vanished right away, and never surfaced any more in the next years.


But the side effects of colonoscopy (just like cystoscopy on February, 2004) were disastrous: bleedings and bloody discharges from both paths (macro-hematochezia and gross hematuria); dysuria, micturition, burning, itching, severe pain, almost complete ischuria, etc.


A curious "collateral" fact: the secretary, registering my arrival (on this procedure), confiscated my hospital card, and did not return it to me - as I insisted, ordering to go and to receive a new one.


But - when I got my things, which I put into the locked locker, the old card appeared in my jeans pocket. Who, why, and how put it there?


If to exclude an intentionally brought infection - during the procedures of February, 2004, and October, 2012: there is a single reasonable explanation: these tests have transferred a hidden somewhere infection from some places to others; the contagium could be activated also because of squeezing of some organs; bleedings could be also caused by squeezing of some organs.


It is possible that this procedure was carried out during the prostate abscess recurrence, which squeezing could lead to the most serious consequences.


So, on October 22, 2012 (again almost for my birthday), on my own initiative, the aggressive invasive exam was performed, without having revealed anything significant. But, the same as cystoscopy on February 3, 2004, this procedure became a real disaster, having caused the next wide UTI recurrence, even more acute than in March, 2012 (March symptoms: reddening or dermatosis (it can be compared to the beginning of this disease: see 2001); itching; gripes accompanying by acute dysuria; hematuria with bright red blood (new symptom); macro-hematochezia; pains during sleep on the back (since 2010), etc.).


Right after colonoscopy, hematuria and other "haemo"; burning; itching; fever; high temperature (37.8); white tongue; nocturia (up to 20 times per night); etc.


An urgent visit to my family doctor terminated in receiving a "new" antibiotic, which I never received before.


He prescribed 28 Protrin DF, which I began to take since October 27, 2012.


Side effects became the most tragic circumstance, because even an incomplete course of this antibiotic "moved away" everything (for years, bothering me), all symptoms and syndromes, and temporarily COMPLETELY cured me: for the first time since 2001.


Unfortunately, I experienced hallucinations and other ghost effects (apparitions, phantoms), tachycardia, intolerable headaches, an incoordination of movements, rash, unquenchable thirst, and other dangerous symptoms of heavy side effects. I was lucky to stop Protrin in time, having ceased to take it. It is not excluded that, if I could take the whole course of Protrin, I, at last, would get rid of the misfortune, which was destroying me during 12 passed years. (See below the Protrin prescription documents).


My personal opinion is that such a dangerous medication as Protrin needed the description of wider listing of side effects (see above the instruction delivered on October 26, 2012).


SUCH a drug - certainly - needed more detailed list of side effects.


Ridiculously cut-down paragraph (see - in French - effets secondaires possibles - possible side-effects) - nausea, loss of appetite, dizziness, brown urine: serious omission.


If I did not take a complete list of Protrin"s side effects of in another pharmacy, it could be come to a VERY bad end.


Since November 2 (again a "gift" on my birthday!): herpes popped out on my lower lip, which never happened in my whole life.


How, from where and why it could come - it is a next mystery.


For years, I have no body contact with other people: I do not kiss anyone (as accepted among "rams" in Canada); I shake no hands, etc. I perform hygienic procedures fanatically. Just as the extremely strange wart (see further, for the following - 2013) and some skin viruses: this was an absolutely "inexplicable" phenomenon.


No one of my close ones or relatives, or friends - had neither herpes, nor warts nor by then, nor in general ever.


For days (it happens) I stay at home; the circle of my communication is very narrow.


I use public transportation extremely seldom (preferring to walk on foot or to move by bicycle, or on "rollers"), mostly in an emergency situation (almost never - on peak hours).


One more interesting part: I tried to get rid of this misfortune by reliable natural ("people"s") methods - unsuccessfully.


Only after, in 2 weeks, when I went to a walk-in clinic, I got a cure that helped. (See below).


It is unnecessary even mentioning a suspicious "binding" of herpes to my birthday. 80+ percent of the most suspicious and unexpected health disasters (especially poisonings and infections), since 2001, used to start on the dates of my birthdays and main holidays. And, again, I should remind that, when I was persecuted by such an enforcement agency as Canadian Federal Immigration, many of the sadists, employed there, loved to amuse themselves (having a lot of fun) by sending disastrous for immigration candidates decisions on their victims' birthdays, or on main holidays. Especially were attached to this sadistic amusement doctors and bureaucrats from IMS: Immigration Medical Services.


On November 9, 2012, the urine test (which my family doctor ordered) did not find any infection, and THIS time, I believe, it was REALLY true.


The doctor promised to call me, to inform about the test"s result-report anyway: in case of positive or negative findings, but did not contact me. Later I found out that he received this report-result with a big delay. That is why - on November 19, 2012 - I was in his office again, but there were also other reasons.


Bearing in mind a "mysterious", "fallen from the moon" herpes and other infectious problems, which appeared "from nowhere" (against the background of "zero" physical socializing and the first-class hygiene), and considering an inexplicable one-day gastric (?) virus on December 1-2 2012 (not mentioning also a short dermatological problem (apparently, of infectious origin as well), which was "solved" by antibiotic cream Fucidin) - whether it is worth being surprised that a UTI recurrence "was drawn" again on December 2-3, 2012 - with hematuria and other bloody discharges, though - since October 26, 2012, i.e. for more than a month - ALL urological problems (for the first time since January 1, 2001!) disappeared after an incomplete course of Protrin?


On December 6, 2012 (Thursday), concerning this new recurrence with huge hematuria and other symptoms, I was admitted at 16:50 by Dr. Morris.


He performed several tests in his office, said that I have "a serious urological problem", and told me to come next day, Friday, December 7, 2012.


I believe that - for a short time in 2012 - Dr. Morris began to take my words without mistrust, and, by unknown reasons, expressed a will, finally, to cure my (already tremendous by then) urological problems. I don't remember exactly, if Dr. Morris told me this during an appointment on October, 5, 2012, or during our telephone conversation, but he said that he's seeing an only full and radical solution to my problems: a surgical intervention, which aim must be to widen the narrowed and calcified outlet. I answered that, if so, and if he sees no other solutions, then I am ready for such a procedure.


Thus, Dr. Morris's statement that I have "a serious urological problem" fit into his NOW constructive and responsible intentions. And his determination to see me tomorrow I interpreted as a sign that he will announce a date of a surgery, or a plan of radical conservative methods to cure my problems.


But next day, December 7, a sharp and sudden change has emerged in his behavior and in his attitude towards me in general.


He began to question - again - each my word (in particular, he "doubted" hematuria); denied that there is anything worrying about my urological health; ridiculoused all mine complains and symptoms" description; did not wish to believe that Protrin temporarily "removed" practically all urological symptoms and inconveniences; and said a very strange, even shocking phrase: that - supposedly -I am a "too healthy person" (!).


Without having received from him even a requisition on urine test, I got such an order in a walk-in clinic:


However, I did not manage to obtain a copy of this test"s result-report. It expands again and prolongs the list of completely disappeared laboratory tests: probably, the longest than any other patient"s in Canada!


15-17 December, 2012, (and later, few times): there was an especially massive hematuria, sharp pain and unpleasant feelings, etc.


Dr. Morris"s bigoted cruelness has crowned more than 12 years of the refined torture, executed by doctors. An only doctor, who showed an ethical, even empathically human approach, was Dr. Assaad El-Hakim, who reserved for me a correct treatment strategy and prescribed the adequate medications. However, my problem needed systematic follow-ups and additional appointments, when needed, but police intimidation and the incontinency of moving around by public transportation going to a distant suburb (especially at winter, and during the acute UTIs) have destroyed Dr. El-Hakim"s efforts. In addition, the pharmacies have sabotaged an access to medications, prescribed by Dr. El-Hakim, making impossible the therapy.


Let's sum up the result.


The first manifestation of this infection materialized on 1 January 2001. Interestingly, it happened at once after a restaurant New Year's party from Montfort Hotel, were I was absent, but my wife present. Several gifts from her co-workers have emerged in our apartment from this party.


It was preceded:

1) (October-November, 2000) deceptive Immigration officials" charges - that, allegedly, entering into Canada, I hid that I am, allegedly, infected with infections of HIV, hepatitis B, tuberculosis, and so on;

2) (October-November, 2000) counterfeit (fake) blood test on venereal diseases - from CDL laboratory (which I never did), allegedly, by an order of an Immigration doctor;

3) (November, 2000) counterfeit (forged) fluorography, on the basis of which Immigration medical department issued a false diagnosis "tuberculosis" (and planned to put me by force into an infectious disease unit), refuted (by me) in course of stunning revelations and persistent fight;

3) (December, 2000) threat of a doctor - "a saver of the false diagnosis" - to infect me with the UT infection.


(Symptoms have shown precisely on January 1, 2001: that completely corresponds to Immigration officials" obsession for sending their most negative decisions - the most tragic for residency status seekers - for birthdays of their victims, or important dates, or for main holidays).


The second - almost disastrous - infection"s recurrence and its most serious complications: happened after the cystoscopy (2 February, 2004), administrated by Dr. Pharand, who left me to the mercy of fate, and actually eliminated me from the list of his patients, claiming that, allegedly, I did not come to a rendezvous (that was not true).


The third most destructive infection"s recurrence - has happened after a dinner at "Russian-Jewish" restaurant "Bufet" (2010). (On my birthday).


Since December, 2010: pain in several places of the UT, related to both functions.


The ultrasonography confirmed the advancing problems [BPE] - (45).


The urine test on December 14, 2010, confirmed micro-hematuria.


The fourth most destructive recurrence was destroying my health since March, 2012.


(It is necessary to add that - for years - I excluded any salty, peppered, marinated, mixed with spices and ginger, and other spicy food; and I did not drink alcohol in general or ALMOST did not drink it (it means that I just pretended supporting the company, only wetting my lips in vine for extremely rare occasions).


The fifth destructive recurrence of urological problems was the most dreadful: it happened after colonoscopy in October, 2012. It was followed by massive hematuria (in all cases, it was terminal hematuria), hematochezia and spontaneous hematos.; sporadic time delay and probably an obstruction at the level of prostate outlet.


Between these 5 most destructive recurrences: there were a number of less dramatic ("smaller") recurrences, most of which fell precisely on my birthday (3 November) every year.


3 urine tests found an infection (all 3 of them ordered by non-Montreal doctors, and (1) done in a lab outside of Montreal, while dozens and dozens of Montreal tests disappeared or partially disappeared, were incomplete or non-reliable (strange, untypically composed reports), and never found any infection. The discovered bacteria are living usually in the gastrointestinal tract or other organs of any healthy person, but - when they "get" into a "wrong place" - there the infection begins. It brings up a number of interesting questions.


On one hand - entherococci: is a typical infection, the driver of acute and chronic UTI and prostatitis, which is difficult to detect, and, therefore, it is revealed only at 10 percent of patients.


On the other hand - the infinite ACUTE recurrences are atypical and connected to some accessory factors. Moreover, according to a French professor, who viewed the list of my symptoms, several lab tests and other exams: a number of symptoms and medical data particularities are - at the same time - atypical and suspiciously strange (his literal characteristic).


The Professor (if - again - I correctly understood him) claimed that it is necessary to suspect an unrepresentative combination of an aerobic and anaerobic infection in my case. In the late 1940-s or in the early 1950-s, allegedly, there was a theory that a similar infection can be caused by a gram-positive bacterium, which is spreads from upper respiratory tracts.


Since February, 2012, I began to state to doctors an assumption that the gross hematuria might be connected to the discharge getting to urinary bladder from other organs, and even wrote them special letters, but doctors made fun of me. As it appeared at the beginning of 2015, I was absolutely right. In urine tests since then, there (concerning prostate secretion) were notes of "Present". And it - as far as I know from medical literature: is a very serious condition.


Since the end of November, 2012 (and - especially - in December of the same year) I was experiencing brutal pain in the outer end of the left foot (joints' problem). My family doctor has organized (November 12, 2012) an X-ray of the left foot (see below):


Now: about other (not medical) events for the same time frame:


On March 14, 2012, when I waited for my companions to take me to a rehearsal with a music group (with which I recorded my songs), I was stopped and interrogated by a private police officer at the corner of Saint-Antoine and Rose da Lima streets. (The details are described in the series about dozens (more than 100) police and security interceptions, interrogations, searches, etc.).


On April 19, 2012, my bicycle was taken away from me. This incident was obviously planned, was executed with the police supervision, had a hidden coordinator, and exploited the features of my individual psychology. (Details are described in an appropriate section of the series about dozens (more than 100) police and security interceptions, interrogations, searches, etc.).


On April 22, 2012, my younger daughter was arrested, and, during the police detention, handcuffed, searched, photographed, finger-printed; all this was illegal. She was fined illegally, while there were no bases for this purpose.


On April 26, 2012, someone once again smashed our car (7-th time in just 3 years: incredible thing for Montreal, where, till 2016, such things have happened extremely rarely).


Police ignored all our declarations (statements) about similar incidents, and, despite the confession that the main destroyer of our car is known to police (he was known also to myself as a police spy), and, despite of the fact that the photo of this young man, jumping on the hood of our car, was displayed by 3 or 4 newspapers, and the interview with my older daughter about her reaction to vandals' actions was published in central Montreal's press papers, the police investigation was firmly blocked.


We had to replace the view mirrors, the windshield, the roof, the hood, and the deck lid. It was an improbable luck that the insurance company paid for everything. (However, next year the considerable increase of the insurance payments - due to this incident - by the insurance company - eliminated all the benefits).


Astonishingly, while 2 young men, who destroyed our car, were known to police, and were cached on camera, no charges were laid. The police claimed that our car was destroyed during the demonstration.


However, there are reasonable doubts about it.


First, there are facts that our car was already smashed prior to demonstration.


Secondly, when I asked my wife and my daughter whether they saw around at least even one more smashed car, they answered negatively.


Thirdly, the rage of the demonstrators, whose anger was directed against the rich, wealthy, and elite, should be exercised on luxury cars, not on an old, plain, and cheap vehicle.


Fourthly, I studied hundreds of photos from blogs and news (and activist) web websites, and did not find any damaged car on this day in this neighborhood, except ours. The photos of our mechanical sufferer were shown by all Montreal"s leading newspapers, including La Press, Journal de Montreal, Devoir, etc.


Journal de Montreal interviewed my older daughter.


When I, personally, spoke to police on the phone, trying to understand, why there no charges (the police claimed that identified one person (allegedly, a young man), who broke the windshield, but, still, declared that cannot bring any charges), reminding also about the second vandal, who (on all photos) jumps on the car"s hood - the police officer hung up.


I tried to speak to police about this incident several times, but unsuccessfully.


Meanwhile, the ugly face of the 2-nd vandal seems very familiar, and, in my records, this young man (whose personal features' descriptions I found in my notes) appears as one of the authorities" spies or provokers.


There were no reports (in the press for April 26, 2012) about any other broken car.


In April (2012), we began to receive anonymous e-mails, in which the actual numbers of our banking transaction and the type of financial transactions were precisely mentioned. It was also said in these anonymous letters that I am, allegedly, engaged in illegal money transfer abroad.


I made my own investigation, during which it was clarified that the e-mail addresses - specified in the letters - and the official report of banking activity: carry on the Belgian website netrv.be in Flemish (not in French or German) language - that specifies belonging to the Belgian elite: Netwerk van Christelijke solidariteitsorganisaties in Vlaanderen en Brussel.


An attempt to load the official report about this banking transaction has failed: an icon, which reported that it "was remote 6 hours ago", has jumped out.


It was, for certain, not a deception, but a real financial record, but someone providently erased it shortly before my potentially expected attempt to download it.


The page of the monetary institution - was also not false, but real, belonging to the Federal Reserve of the United States, which is tightly connected to NACHA (The Electronic Payments Association) - the sponsor of cashing in of checks and other finance documents - and Automated Clearing House (ACH) through which operations on conversion of the check into cash are really performed.


The IP address, from which were sent the messages to my anonymous (!) mailboxes was listed on the "black lists" among spam senders. Its host was the Corporacion Digitel C.A. company in the city of San Fernando, Venezuela, but the actual host: a compartment of this company in Bolivia, or in Dominican Republic (Dominica (Roseau, Saint George) (South (Latin) America).


The user name was buhgalter (accountant) that allows to assume: a) the "g", instead of "h" (buch halter) - is connected to Russian? b) in all cases: it linked to finances, banking, money.


In 2012, the "accountant" appeared on the Net under flags of ten countries about 25 times.


The Corporacion Digitel company (founded in 1999) - is one of those companies that coded their users as much as possible. It located on Avenida La Estancia, Centro Benaven, the city of Cubo Negro.


Actually, the sender of the sent "financial" messages only used this company as a transit point on the way of his emails from an email server Robtex.com, which provides high privacy to its clients (generally - to corporations and very well-established individuals).


This company - is a "secret" one, information on which is not so simple to find anywhere.


For this reason, its second ("hidden") name - Direct Privacy ID. The address of its office is not known even to clients, who only know the so-called post office box: in the town of Metairie, LA (USA).


Very few people know that Robtex is a part of the New York company Globix Corporation (founded in 1989 as "Bell Technology Group, Ltd.", since 2007 - NEON Communications Group, Inc.), bought in 2006 by Quality Technology Services, which apparently is related to Israel.


This is an even more secret organization, with its office in Santa Clara, California (shares the territory with the Microsoft company!), and registered by Capitol Corporate Services Inc. - the guarantor, - a firm, which does not have neither an address, nor a person in charge, nor a contact telephone number.


The Quality Technology Services itself was registered Wednesday, July 11, 2007, as a FOREIGN firm in the territory of the USA. Though its head office in all reference manuals is in Santa Clara, it actually located at 12851 Foster Street, Suite 205, Overland Park, KS 66213, United States.


The heads of this firm are: Mr. Chad L. Williams (Chairman and Chief Executive Officer), Mr. Mark D. Waddington (President and Chief Operating Officer), Mr. James L. Williams (Founder), Mr. William H. Schafer (Chief Financial Officer), Ms. Shelagh Montgomery (Executive President of Sales). This is an exclusive information, which does not present even in the WikiLeaks (and especially - in Wikipedia).


The combinations of names, middle names and surnames (of one and all) sound on the American language "very much on Jewish" and "on British" "style".


This company is a member of the American-Israeli commercial chamber, member of so-called as-verio-64602 group, code number 40 | 20141 | QUALITYTECH-SUW-300 - Quality Technology Services, LLC., globally controls 61.665 IP addresses in 31 groups, generates 510 IP addresses.


This thread leads to another IP - 65.55.90...., - or, more precisely, to the physical sender of the letter received by me, a real person. The sender was in Redmond, Washington, behind a group of buildings at 8700 16-th Avenue Northeast, Redmond. There, in the closed (classified; made secret) green zone, the Microsoft office residence is located; an access to this zone is forbidden, and even Google does not show objects in this zone.


This territory belongs to Microsoft Corporation, but it is unknown - what is situated here, and what is the purpose of this residence.


This authentic email server (from which the letter was sent) is the "Microsoft Hosting", so, the sender, on all signs - could be an employee of the Microsoft Corporation, or an agent of secret services.


From all above-mentioned information key concepts words are derived: BELL (BELL), Microsoft, Israel.


This combination should be considered and remembered for understanding of previous and further events.


Since April 23 (2012), several new messages on the same subject arrived on all my e-mail addresses (including anonymous and email boxes of relatives and friends - to which I got an access).


And it means that the senders are perfectly informed about who am I, and that I am using all these addresses.


A series of similar emails was accompanied by calls allegedly "from Microsoft Corporation". The callers claimed - on behalf of Microsoft - that, allegedly, someone accessed one of Microsoft"s Internet pages from my computer, and that the scanner of its website detected that allegedly, something is "not OK" with my computer. I learned that all such calls were made from India, Pakistan, or Bangladesh.


In turn, these calls were accompanied by strange emails with an attached file under the name schrieder@onlinestores.metaservices.microsoft:


Schrieder: it was one of my own anonymous Internet nicknames, best of all protected by the anonymity filters and used by me for chats and discussions in German language. Therefore, this provocation is certainly bears the fingerprints of foreign (most likely - by style - British-Israeli [but, as an imitation, this style could be appropriated by any other totalitarian regime: from Belarus and RF, to SA]) secret services.


From April 23 to May 12 (2012) - there arrived 6 notifications about - allegedly - reserved by me (as the user of the email box) services or purchases, which I, allegedly, did not pay for. My name or any other exact detail was not specified; however, the fact that the identical duplicated spam messages arrived to ALL of my e-mail addresses (except one (anonymous): compensates the absence of my name.


These notifications mentioned an air ticket to India; ordered pizza, etc., and they also contained the threats.


Since the beginning of May, this story received an even more disturbing prolongation. Anonymous senders began to send notes about our real banking accounts and banking activities protected by the most stringent laws and obligations by banks to protect personal information of their customers. And, at last, threats of even more specific character have begun to arrive.


Here is a typical of this series of letters (May 13, 2012 (see the original English text in the footnote [1]).


Here, on behalf of USA Bureau of Customs Control and Border Security (allegedly, "attributed" to FBI and World Bank group), the sender affirms that - supposedly - connect to the receiver of this letter (i.e. to the user of this e-mail) a packet with money from Benin, Africa.


In this message was stated a demand that - within 24 hours - the receiver must obtain a certificate from Homeland Security bureau ("a second CIA" as it is called by bloggists), otherwise the parcel will be considered as "an act of terrorism, dirty money laundering, and drug trafficking".


All such emails with blackmail, false charges and threats had different return addresses (Polish, German, Scandinavian, Ukrainian, or others), but in practice all were sent from the same place. They were sent from the office in Bangladesh of the branch of British firm Sterling Multi-Technologies Limited. This company is a child branch of Britain and Bangladesh intelligence agencies; it is also attributed to the Ministry of Defence of Bangladesh. It gemmated in 1995 from the parent British firm. According to some experts, the company Sterling Multi-Technologies Limited is directly connected to Israeli Mossad. It is engaged in Security & Intelligence (security and investigation), Cyber-Crime (crimes on the Internet), and also medicolegal and judicial technical expertizes.


Surprisingly, on the list of its services the "Heath Care" (medicine, medical attendance) appears.


Such "multimachine operators" are extremely dangerous to all people: they are capable to produce and use for their sinister purposes both computer and biological viruses...


(By the way, in the e-mail source of this sender as well (in addition to the traces of the company of Technology Sterling) it "was lit" the Microsoft Hosting and an email server connected to Microsoft Hosting in Washington, Redmond.)


In increasing frequency, we see the enterprises (generally Israeli or connected to Israel), which main profile is espionage, special troops, war and murder, "in a makeweight" owning hospitals and policlinics, or listed among the partners of medical institutions. These war criminals may act as the owners (or hidden owners) of hospitals and policlinics in Europe and North America, or be part of medical institutions' (like hospitals, radiologies, medical laboratories, policlinics, etc.) security and video surveillance contractors or partners, technical equipment providers and maintenance managers, employment departments' chiefs, network technical support, or medical imaging sharing network. Such notorious spy-murder-war international companies are indivisibly connected to banks.


These "multimachine operators" not just break the main ethical principles. Such a "combination" of war crimes and health care: it is as though an executioner, after his main, bloody, job, would put on a white dressing gown - and went "to work as a doctor". And, meanwhile, if such "multimachine operators" have not a direct bearing on medical field, then they, at least, install and control the software for hospitals and policlinics, or establish and control the spying surveillance cameras, etc.


Then, whether it is worth being surprised that the infection, which provoked the majority of my health problems and which forced me to have innumerous courses of antibiotics, was not identified, and, the main thing - since 2001 - no diagnosis was officially stated!


(3-4 single "accidental" positive results - are not counted!).


The provocations have affected not only me personally, but also my close circle. Once a friend called me, and reported that his portable computer "is dead". When he brought it, I saw the following. Instead of the start of the system, the initial screen displays the logo (in the form of the picture) of Canadian intelligence, the CSIS, with the notification that the computer is disabled for "illegal activities", and that "to unblock" it, it is necessary to pay:


"The Government of Canada. Canadian Security Police and Investigation (CSIS). Attention! This operating system is disabled due to violations of Canadian Law! The following violations are recorded: Web sites with pornography were visited from this IP address (...)". [This is not the original text, but a back translation from my chronicle in Russian.]


The aged owner of this computer - is a normal user. He does not understand anything in computers and does not go anywhere. Everything that he does on Internet: he receives emails from his sister. His limited skills do not allow him even to browse the web pages or to read news. In 20 minutes I unblocked this system. So, it was not necessary to pay. Just in case, I fully combed the hard drive, glanced in the browser history, and saw nothing from listed above. No pornography, no illegal activity. (Not to mention that the adult pornography is not banned in Canada).


Not accidentally, the stylistics of many spam and fraud samples (messages) reflect the special oriental English of India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh, not the standard British, American, Canadian, or Australian.


Probably, a new anonymous letter, which I received (10-11 May, 2012) was composed in such an "Indian" syllable. There it is told - by the way: "Due to your illegal activity, the Internet-access will be blocked by your ISP. To avoid this, you must contact us within 3 days".


On May 14 (2012) - my Internet was really disconnected... It did not work till May 16 including... During these 3 days we continuously called our Internet-provider company (ISP), trying not only restoring our access to the Network, but also to learn about the reason, for which our Internet-access was blocked. Company"s employers responded that they "do not know the case". At last, they said that our telephone line was disconnected by Bell, the owner of all physical telephone lines, and sent "a specialist from BELL". This American-Canadian company completely controls all telecommunications systems in Canada, and small-sized telephone subcontractors, such as АТ&Т, Rogers, Primus, and others: are only the intermediaries of services. Thus, the Canadian telecom is tightly controlled by a foreign state (United States). The fact that we are clients of other telephone firm does not change anything. All the same all physical capacities (main telephone lines, stations and substations, communications and the equipment) are in BELL"s hands.


BELL"s specialist declared that he will install (beside the entrance door - on the input of the telephone line) "a tiny box", which - supposedly - "will improve the communication". He replied to our disagreement that if we refuse, then the Internet provider will have an occasion to shift the blame for the absence of the Internet on our refusal to allow "the tiny box"s installation" eternally. He also added that he will be forced to mention it in the official report, and then we will not receive the Internet at all.


My wife became very nervous, and intervened, and I had no chance, but to comply.


The box appeared to be not that "tiny"; rather, on the contrary. It looked as a standard filtering device, which is not equipped with any tapping technology, a drive of information or an auxiliary bond. And yet I asked a direct question: whether this box will eavesdrop on our telephone conversations and to monitor our Internet-activity? And whether for this reason (to have a pretext for installing it) our Internet was disconnected? His reaction was unexpected. He suddenly began to call somewhere and someone, and, having lowered his voice, was negotiating about something. He then went out to the street, to his car, and then (on returning from the street, from his car) he asked to be allowed in the toilet, and his muffled phone conversation was heard from there.


After negotiations, he once again went down the stairs, to his minibus, and brought from there another box, this time - a normal separator (signal splitter), like others, which I saw in the computer stores. Such an adaptor separates a telephone "line" (data) from Internet (data), strengthening a network signal. It is unlikely something additional was built in it, but who knows? I was disturbed by another thing. It seemed to me that, digging in the hole from where wires stuck out, and having closed it by his palm, he pushed something into the wall, in a bore of the small telephone shaft. To check this box-separator, or just to disconnect it, having restored the former configuration, I still can do it. But to find some "third" device in the wall: it is a difficult task.


The most interesting part was that - after all these manipulations - the Internet did not work all the same. BELL"s employee called to our phone from the backyard, where he twice "got" into the telephone shinguard, and, using his equipments, clarified that the Internet line works perfectly and that the access failure to Internet is not connected to a problem of signal"s submission. The Internet was disconnected in the Internet company! In an hour (!) it suddenly began to work by itself.


How did all these separate events, with the involvement of a number of countries and geographical regions, organizations, institutions, and agencies, were joined in one chain?


Certainly, not in my own head! The spam-message warning that the Internet will be disconnected in 3 days, arrived exactly 3 days before: and exactly after 3 days the Internet was disconnected. Someone started to fire at me by threats and ridiculous accusations: and immediately similar threats began to arrive on computers of people from my close circle, with whom I am not connected by any electronic correspondence, blogs, chats, or social networks. Firmness of all these incidents, their acceleration in time contradicts logic of probability, so, these events could not be just the coincident.


To combine all this in one can only a unique wide terrorist network. This is the aggressive terrorist networks of the biggest global "hawks", behind the USA borders working together with its shameless "multimachine operators" - Amazon, Google, Facebook, Twitter, and so on. But the American search engines and social networks have also the second, human face (like Google, and, certainly, not Amazon or Facebook), bringing benefits and combining the positive functions with the "rigid" negative. If not the world Christian and Jewish Zionism and not the influence on them of the intelligence agencies of one "very small, but very stinky state" and private "firms of security", the USA espionage networks would be restricted to exclusively military intelligence, without being grabbing peaceful civilians by their feelers. All responses to the posed questions get together in the small area between Africa and Asia.


The disconnection of the TV news canals in days of tensions and disorders became not such an unusual occurrence. When all world media were silent, and only Russia Today TV channel shed light to the revolt in Quebec - Russia Today did not work for 4 days.


Also the individual diversions (sabotage) are not excluded.


On June 10, 2012, all our TV news canals suddenly ceased to work. I checked the installations of the receiver, the switch and the conveyors - everything, up to wires. It was necessary to move forward to the terrace-balcony. And there ... Some swine twisted one of bolts. The antenna cymbal keeps holding on a board of two wooden plates - from within and outside of balcony handrail - bolted with each other. The antenna fastens to the board by 2 bolts, one of which kept unless on the word of honor. There was no dense rust on its hat, as on the hat of its neighbor. It shone as new. But fully showered rust accumulated in the dredging of the holder, and it means that the aggregate was twisted quite recently: after the last rain.


(The chronicle of our Internet disconnections is described in the series about the administrative sabotage, repression, and provocations in the section for the beginning of June, 2012).


In June, 2012, after this new epic of systematic Internet disconnections, I managed to replace the "box" - installed by the telephone company BELL - by just the same, which I bought in a computer store. Then I also paid attention to what I right away lost sight by absent-mindedness.


Our dwelling is equipped with a special telephone "plug" on an input ("entrance") of the telephone network (and just on the entrance to the apartment). All wires were joined in a bundle and went to the connector, which could be pulled out from the slot that disconnects the whole network. Thus, the telephone signal could be interrupted on the input, cutting it off from our apartment completely. In case of failure, such switch-off (for 5-10 minutes) could "restart" the system, and telephone communication could be reestablished.


Now, when BELL's technician brought all wires to the separator ("splitter"), this function of the manual cutout does not work.


In defiance of norms, the possibility of "restarting" is voided.


But even this - is not the main concern.


Considering that phones' manufacturers leave a backdoor way for potential wiretap by the intelligence agencies even in a passive status (when "the receiver is on the lever"), the disconnection of the interrupter is equivalent to wiretap installation.


On June 17, 2012, someone smashed our car again.


It happened in the evening, in the Old City, where the car was parked and where the protection and security - the highest in Montreal.


At night, July 2, 2012, I was once again stopped and interrogated by police (patrol car 15-13, in which 2 policewomen sat).


The chronicle of hundreds of escorts, interceptions, detentions, interrogations, and searches by police is selected by me in a separate series about police intimidation and persecution. Here I mention just few typical examples.


(For example, after July 2, I was stopped by police cars 20-85, 15-86, 26-1, 16-1, 21-1, 38-1, and 35-1 (or 33-1), and on Tuesday, August 28, 2012, I was not simply stopped, but once again stopped, subjected to ID check up and interrogation by police (patrol car 20-1). But - with a special addiction and cynicism (even a dummy reason for intercepting me was not stated at least!) I was detained and interrogated by police on October 17, about 1:15, at night (patrol car 15-87 or 15-8).


On Thursday, August 23, we were at friends" birthday party. We spent by them no more than 3 or 3 and a half hour. When we came back home, we found explicit traces of penetration into the apartment.


By September 2012, it became already - finally - clear that the round-the-clock surveillance by police is accompanied not just by the "support" of civil cars, but by the cars with replaceable license plate numbers.


On 20-th of October, 2012, the cable television was disconnected.


Describing numerous events, connected to the sphere of medicine, it is impossible to omit a whole avalanche of diversiform and infinite strange occurrences, which"s proof (example) of gravity can be given below.


After a walk with a friend (with whom similar phenomena are linked) on July 1, 2012: short-time dizziness, weakness, whistle in ears, disorder of vision and hearing. On arrival home - normal pressure (120х78); I had drunk enough water before walk.


Similar phenomena already happened after walks with the same person on August 1, 2009; June 1, 2010. It never happened any more and under no circumstances. For the next day, July 2, there was a nasal bleeding. Nasal bleedings repeated till July 4 of 5 times. Then, on July 2 - a massive hematuria with bright red blood, which was accompanied by gripes in the urinary bladder. On the same day: enterogastric bleeding with the same scarlet blood.


Any attempt to see a doctor was not crowned with success. The Emergency just kicked me out. If bleeding would continue to be massive and non-stop, I could perish, without having received any medical care.


Hardly audible whistle in ears appeared, took place, and then completely disappeared for 3 months in the period of antibiotics therapy.


I exchanged letters with professor from Cologne, and that latter told me that a combination of HPV viruses, euterococci, an entherococci, and Helicobacter Pylori: it would be extremely strange to expect in the same person so far - as such combination has the highest cancerogenic danger and chances to call oncology. If I correctly understood him: it is a hint on the fact that this "cocktail" of viruses "was selected deliberately".


After Protrin (October 26, 2012), ALL SYMPTOMS AND INDISPOSITIONS - for the first time (since January 1, 2001!) - disappeared completely (see above) for a long time. Some time I was ABSOLUTELY HEALTHY.


_________________________________


Here I find it necessary to reserve to a VERY IMPORTANT off-topic.


All these years - with uncommon persistence and determination - I tried to obtain a diagnosis of the urological disease, but ALL DOCTORS sabotaged the diagnosis, and never clearly wrote or told about what"s wrong, and never pronounced the medical name-term of this problem or problems. Being betrayed by doctors, I did almost everything possible in my situation fighting against this "mysterious" illness.


I fanatically adhered to a diet, having excluded everything that - as I noted - called recurrencies. I excluded all spices, all spicy, bitter and salty food, alcohol, cold beverages and food, etc.


All these years I tried to keep myself in a good physical shape: regularly walked much; approximately since 2006 or 2007 (when for the first time in my life has learned to ride bicycle; and - since 2005 - began running on roller skates) rode bike and roller skates (meeting certain conditions specified in contraindications!); did special exercises for the lower body and the lower sections of the backbone; did exercises with dumbbells; etc.


I carried out the self-treatment by the methods of alternative medicine: "garlic therapy"; natural substitutes of alpha blockers; antibacterial agents (such as mixture of cranberry juice with the ave.); used simple hot sedentary baths, and (also) with components of different substances and plants; completed a self-hardening course; tried to heal myself by the "dry" fasting, etc.


Self-treatment included the means used in case of funiculitis, vesiculitis, and other diseases of the same sphere, but - as we see - except the temporal improvements - all my efforts did not bring a victory over the illness. However, who knows, maybe, if not this stubborn determined self-treatment, I would simply die.


During the aspiration to clarify the main reason of the problem and to get rid of it, I showed - to a certain extent - courage, often unrepresentative for humanitarians of my type and humanitarian professions: I fully finished all courses of antibiotics - despite annoying and dangerous side effects; I passed 2 invasive procedures, and did all difficult preparation for them.


Parallel to the described ordeals, all these years I was exposed to numerous attacks and the set-up incidents.


I was hit by cars; unknown persons imitated attempts to hit me by car, or really tried to knock me down by cars a set of times; strangers attacked me repeatedly in the midst of, as they say, "a white day" (in sight of tenth or hundreds of eye-witnesses); in result of the attempts to bring me down me by cars and motorcycles - I got additional injuries; fallings - while running bicycle and roller skates - or a possibility of fallings - were set up (oil poured on a bend; a plastic canister with unbent and sharp (as a knife) edge of splitting placed on my way, etc.); a stranger-driver, who was trying to hit me by his car on the trottoir (on the pavement) - next time attacked me with a knife, etc.


Similar set-up incidents at my apartment remind technique methods represented by Canadian-American movie "The Collector".


With all serious injuries I used to come to Emergency Rooms, but did not receive any medical help, and was forced to heal myself, without any medical assistance. Terribly looking bruises, injuries of ligaments and joints, fractures, wounds, and other injuries I had to cure myself, by means of such simple means as salt, soda, ice, cold and heat, chalk, lime, oil, iodine, alcohol, bandages, extensions, massage, exercise, etc.


It is suspicious that the most of infection"s recurrences fell precisely:

1) on the 1-st day of a New Year (for example, the 2001);

2) on my birthday (or were "coordinated" for it);

3) on other holidays and significant dates.


All 3 possible attacks by a remote weapon that generates directed microwave radiation also fell on 1) birthday, 2) Christian Orthodox holiday, 3) historical date (Hitler's attack on USSR).


And how to interpret such a fact: from 2001 to 2012, I visited at least 30 doctors (among whom there were famous and respected specialists of their domain; professors; deans of medical faculties), but as on the problems of chronic UTI infection (especially - confirmed by 3 laboratory tests) - NO DIAGNOSIS; on problems of bones and joints - NO DIAGNOSIS; on injuries and wounds - NO DIAGNOSIS, NO MEDICAL HELP; on cardio-vascular problems - NO DIAGNOSIS; on VERY SERIOUS vision and hearing problems - NO DIAGNOSIS; and the same - in everything??? How is it possible in general?!!


Now, we will sum up the results for 2012:


On July 7, 2012 - "inexplicable" spontaneous bleeding (hematochezia), not connected to any other discharge. My complaints to doctors came across strange and inexplicable mistrust.


Cytology (July 7 - 18, 2012), administrated by Dr. Morris, revealed atypical transit cells. In its abstract: it is impossible to exclude the first stage of TCC (carcinoma) [malignant new growth of transit cells]. Order requisition (for this test) attributes and cytology result-report (as well as other medical documents) - confirm that - from 2001 to 2012 - there is NO DIAGNOSIS!


On July 11, 2012 (14:30) - I was on examined by Dr. Morris. This rendezvous did not solve any problems. Concerning chronic symptoms, I tried to secure Dr. Morris"s understanding, but did not find a common language. This doctor evaded from any comments and from administrating any following diagnostic and medical procedures.


On July 17, 2012, I went to French hospital Hotel Dieu medical archive for the sake of one more attempt to recover the cystoscopy (February 2, 2004) exam"s result-report, considered "missing". The outcome of my request to find it was stunning. It appears that in 2004 there were already atypical transit (i.e. cells covering epithelium of the MPT) cells: Dr. Pharand blocked an access to this cystoscopy's findings (in 2004-2006), concealed revealed by the cystoscopy abnormalities, and did not assign any treatment, or further tests-exams, and did not produce any diagnosis. Dr. Pharan ignored tremendous complication after cystoscopy, did nothing to respond medically to grave, tormenting, and health-threatening side effects of this cystoscopy, and refused to see me and to help me. Besides, after this cystoscopy and its dramatic damaging consequences, he simply expelled me from the list of his patients.


Ultrasonography on August 3, 2012 (ordered by my family doctor): presumable increase in BPH (E) - (40); tiny cyst"s in the left kidney expansion from 1.5 cm up to 2.1 cm.


On September 6, 2012: the laboratory test confirmed - at least - micro-hematuria; CPR - 2.48.


Blood test for the same day (September 6, 2012) - the 6-th page showed abnormal results on the most important hematologic indexes. Such abnormalities could mean - at least - an inflammatory process and other phenomena requiring an urgent medical interference. But no response of doctors followed. Whether accidentally I managed to obtain exclusively this one and only page of this blood test? It means that only this, 6-th page of this blood test I was allowed to see:


1) The index of HCT (Haemotocrit) 0.41 - is lower than the norm. This index reveals a percentage of erythrocytes (red blood cells) from the whole blood.

2) Erythrocytes - 4.63 - lower than the norm.

3) MPV - 6.9 - lower than the norm. In other words, thrombocytes are lower than a norm.


The combination of these 3 parameters below norm can (except even more serious assumptions) to confirm chronic bleeding, such as chronic hematuria.


This indicator in my blood tests, which became to constants since 2008: it is an alarming sign signaling doctors that the chronic hematuria began to threaten with hematologic problems, and it required an urgent medical intervention. But doctors did not react to these signals and blatantly ignored my concerns about this fundamental problem.


On October 5, 2012, I thrust upon reception to Dr. Morris. This appointment (5-10-2012) did not solve any problems. Dr. Morris did not name any diagnosis and the reason of my problems; did not say what must be done to improve my condition; and did absolutely nothing.


However, in an unexpected phone conversation (25 or 26 October, 2012), he - suddenly - mentioned a "serious urological problem", and suggested radical surgical or therapeutic method to address this problem.


Colonoscopy on October 22, 2012, found nothing significant, but caused tremendous disastrous complications: bleedings and bloody selections from both paths; dysuria, micturition, burning, itching, severe pain, almost complete urine obstruction, etc.


A walk-in visit to my family doctor terminated in receiving a "new" antibiotic (which I never had before) - 28 Protrin DF, which I began to take since October 27, 2012. If not suspicion that the infection has started to destroy kidney and other organs, I doubt that I could obtain any antibiotic. Unfortunately, very severe side effects have terminated the course of this antibiotic prematurely. But even few days of taking Protrin have eliminated ALL urological symptoms and syndromes till December, 2012: for 1 complete month. Such a remission (with a disappearance of ALL problems) happened for the 1-st time since 1 January, 2001.


On December 2-3, 2012: another urological recurrence - with hematuria and other bloody discharges.


On December 6, 2012, Thursday, due to new UTI recurrence, with hematuria and other symptoms, I was seen (at 16:50) by the Dr. Brian Morris. He made several tests, recognized (finally!) that I have a "serious urological problem", and ordered to come next day, Friday, December 7, 2012.


But - for the next day, December 7 - his attitude towards me, his behavior, and his treatment manifested a sudden change. He began to call in question (again) each my word (in particular, he "doubted" hematuria), and refuted the truthfulness of any of mine complains. He even said a very strange, even shocking phrase that, supposedly, I am a "too healthy person".


Because Dr. Morris has refused to provide any medical care, and even refused a requisition for urine test, I went to a walk-in clinic, and was given a requisition for urinalysis (December 11, 2012).


However, no one contacted me from the walk-in clinic (as was promised), and I was refused a copy of the report-result of this laboratory test. I tried to obtain this test's result in the medical archive, but was told that the test was not found, then I went to this walk-in clinic again, but they told me that never received a copy of the report (result) for this analysis.


15-17 (later) December, 2012: an especially massive hematuria, pain and unpleasant feelings, etc.


Since February, 2012, I began express to doctors my assumption that the hematuria is connected to the discharges, which are getting to the urinary bladder from other organs, and even stated this suggestion in writing, but they just made fun of me. However, later a laboratory test has confirmed that I was right. (See details above). And this finding was a very serious sign, but doctors have ignored it, too.


Since the end of November, 2012, and - especially in December 2012: brutal arthritic pain, which again coincided with UTF recurrence.


The new recurrence of December, 2012, was (this time) defeated by self-treatment, and - again - as after Protrin - an "unprecedented" for me improvement-remission followed. Since the end of December (or, rather, since mid-December), 2012 - and up to the Orthodox Christmas of January, 2013, NOTHING disturbed me. But it was - calm before a storm...


CHAPTER 3.


2013.


JANUARY, 2013.


So, since the end of October - all November - up to December, 2012: everything was fine, as till 2001. And then, since the mid-December, and till the Orthodox Christmas: nothing bothered me, which happened for the 1-st time in 12 years! ALL symptoms "were gone" at once - as though no chronic illness was present before. Whether it was impossible to administrate the active therapy by antibiotics 12 years ago, in January-February 2001?!! 12 years the infection destroyed my life, and I was deliberately brought to such complications that not only affected my health, but also could take away my life. Now, since the end of October, 2012, till the beginning of December, and then, since mid-December, 2012, till Orthodox Christmas, 2013 (7 January): I had no health problems at all.


It happened FOR THE FIRST TIME since 2001 - while before EVERY DAY brought next problem, and there was NO DAY without bothering urological, rheumatologic, dermatological, gastroenterological, vascular, ophthalmological, and other problems, which were bringing non-stop torture. [An editing (2016) remark: I believe that the mistreatment of my health problems in 1990-s and 2010-s, when the health care was still relatively accessible and available for other people in Canada, was connected to my refugee claim, or, in particular, to the life-long punishment for telling the truth about one pseudo-state, which critics is a taboo in Canada. This pseudo-state is a global headquarters for number of extremist organizations, secret societies, and reactionaries" clubs, including based-in-Canada organizations.]


With all the annoying chronic UTI and other related (to it) problems from January 2001 to February 2004, a real (incompatible) suffering has begun after cystoscopy's complications (side effects) in February 2004, accompanied by the sabotage (by Dr. Pharan, and Royal Victoria and St.-Mary's hospitals' ERs) of complications' medical evaluation and medical help.


However, any period for these last 13 years could not even be compared to what began after an attack by an unknown remove ultrasound weapon on January 7, 2013 (i.e. after an "inexplicable" vertigo with vomiting, diarrhea, abnormally high leukocytosis, and other symptoms), because - after this event - I was overtaken by a living hell-nightmare in reality.


This inexplicable vertigo was described in other books of this series: Who destroyed my vision and hearing. I have no doubts that it was an attack by a secret remote weapon, which generates the microwave radiation. Here I omit the detailed description, concentrating instead on the symptoms.


Approximately 3-4 months prior to January 7, 2013, I noted that 2 or 3 times - when I approached the window in the salon, - I felt some pressure as though the air became elastic, and pressed on my body and face. It was followed by short-time indisposition, which immediately disappeared as soon as I went to the corridor or to the kitchen.


This took place when the blinds were mostly lifted up, it means - when the window was not shielded. After these incidents, I marked short-time (though, it possible, long-term, too - as it seemed to me later) - deterioration of hearing. Not accidentally I mentioned 2012 in my fax message to Dr. Sejean as the beginning of the deterioration in hearing. I also wrote (especially, to friends and acquaintances) that - after vertigo on January 7, 2013 - there was a sharp degradation of hearing, and mentioned it in one of the versions of the chronicle of political repressions, on which this series is based. [This Chronicle was called The License to Kill, was started in 2009, and has been published article after article on Sergei Balandin"s and Maxim Mashkov"s web-sites.]


The audiological texts - one after the 1-st similar attack in 2005, another one in 2015 (after the 2-nd of such attacks; the 3-rd took place in 2016) - confirmed my statements. This justifies a suggestion that 3 similar attacks by microwave (supposedly) radiation led to brain injury, which, in turn, caused vision and hearing degradation.


As well as on October 2, 2007, when I was hit by car, no help was rendered in the Emergency Room (St.-Mary"s Hospital). And, after my description of symptoms, someone could assume that - in January, 2013 - I was attacked by a weapon that can destroy peoples" brain by probable microwave or ultrasonoric radiation, and for this reason (other explanations do not exist) - such scandalous incident as a refusal of a TRUE exam by a doctor after such an extreme vertigo (complicated by a number of other symptoms, by significantly elevated leukocytosis, and blood pressure over 150 (!): was nothing else, but a cover-up.


The avalanche of infections, dermatological and other problems, which followed the super-strange vertigo and described below, speaks well for itself, if we consider versions of poisoning or (which is more probable) radiation. NEVER - till 2013 - I experienced such an uncountable and infinite wave of indispositions, infections, and other sores, which were leaving almost ANY DAY without pains and diseases.


In none of the previous periods there was such a rapid hearing deterioration, as after this suspicious vertigo+other-symptoms on January 7, 2013.


The short duration of the main tsunami of a life-threatening shock also testifies in favor of RADIATION, in the form of a restricted on time illness' attack, which did not repeat any more, whereas - in case of poisoning or a somatopathy - the period of a serious condition would last longer, and the attacks of a serious indisposition would repeat.


In favor of the complications of radiation or a "wound", inflicted by some sort of a secret distant weapon - also speaks an irreversible damage to my vision and hearing.


The blood test in ER of St.-Mary's hospital on January 7, 2013. the 1st page.

1) Abnormal (elevated) leukocytosis - 13 thousand (from the most probable causes - blood cancer, or reaction to an infection, poison, radiation).

2) Low indicator of MPV - deficiency of thrombocytes - reflects an acute renal failure (when kidneys refused), or blood cancer, or widely extended infection, either poisoning with poisons, or a life-threatening exposure to radiation dose.

3) The high rate of neutrophils can mean: a) acute infection / inflammation; b) necrosis (in a heart attack); c) blood cancer; d) sharp poisonings with poisons, life-threatening level of any given radiation.

According to studied by me academic sources, a combination of these 3 indicators is linked to very probable radiation of any type, and, in particular, to radiation by waves of radio frequencies. Especially, it is necessary to notice that the elevated leukocytosis up to 11-12 thousand already needs immediate, urgent attention of doctors, urgent medical examination, and follow ups of the patient under constant observation of the hematologist and others experts at least for several months, but a leukocytosis OVER 12 THOUSAND: it is a dangerous situation, which requires not less medical attention than a stroke or a heart attack. And - with this and other dangerous health-threatening indicators - I was "thrown out" from St.-Mary's ER, having been sent home.


The vitreous body detachment (1-st: in the left eye) - since October 16, 2013 (i.e. the same year; in 10 months after a supposed radiation) corresponds to the terms-limits-periods for the formation of the remote side effects of radiation, and, in particular, for the vision injury.


The vitreous body detachment was obviously also provoked on and accelerated by something that happened during the MRI procedure (electromagnetic resonant scan and the X-ray, which followed), and could not begin "accidentally" in the same day, right after MRI-X-Ray exam.


(The events, surrounding the vitreous body detachment, are described in 3 books of this series, named Who destroyed my vision and hearing).


As for the hearing damage, it happened practically immediately after the incident on January 7, 2013, unlike the vision damage - "postponed" in time.


Since January 22, 2013: ulcers in the mouth (starting since November, 2012, appearing with a frequency in one or two months).


For the first time, this misfortune declared itself in January, 2001, and was obviously connected to the "initial" urological infection.


After 2004 (in my previous notes I was mistaken), it left, and now, after a long break, recurred (again).


Since 2001 (when it for the first time "became a system"): no diagnosis made...


Since January 27, 2013, it began to seem that the infection literally ate the soft and hard palate nearly to a bone...


On January 27 (the same day), since the early morning (already, when, since 4 in the morning I was thinking to go to go to a hospital, to ER) my face suddenly began to burn. The skin acquired the colors of poppy, as if a burn of the 1-st degree. Only by the evening it slightly became better.


On January 28, 2013, I was waiting from 4.00 in the morning, till 3.00 p.m. - in the Emergency Room (ER) - and was not examined by doctor. Everyone, who came even 5-6 (and more) hours later - was called to a doctor (regardless of the gravity of his or her health problem); even those someone, who came with cold, trifling scratches, sprain. So, I left the hospital without having any medical help.


On the same day, January 28, 2013, having not received any medical care in the ER, I managed to get on appointment in a walk-in clinic (that works 7 days a week from 8 in the morning to 6 (it seems) p.m.). A doctor prescribed a course of antibiotics. It helped immediately, it became much better very soon. My face stopped burning; the oral ulcers started healing. But the contagium is not known again. My request "to take a swab test": was refused.


On January 29, 2013, I had an appointment with Dr. Yiri (Ury) Krasny, rheumatologist. At my request, Dr. Krasny ordered the electromagnetic and resonant scan of the left foot.


This exam has disappeared, and was "missing" for almost 2 years (i.e. was hidden from me), inaccessible from both Dr. Krasny"s office, as well as from the medical archive: maybe, because it found the presence of some pathological changes typical for the adjournment of salts. It is enough to assume the same reason for some other problems of joints and ligaments since 2001 - related to the initial urological infection. Before 2001, I had no arthritic pain or joints" problems. The connection between the initial urological infection - and the arthritic problems: is obvious.


If now "to attach" the same interpretation to ALL pathological changes of joints found by the previous tests-exams, and to all followed dramatic attacks of acute arthritis, which, finally, further destroyed my life and my professional activity (as a musician (an advanced pianist, first of all): then, on one hand, it is obvious that this interpretation (diagnosis) could appear years earlier, and, secondly, with its help it was possible to prevent much of what happened during 2 next years.


Dr. Krasny repeatedly responded authoritatively - and in a didactic tone - that I do not have and "cannot have" any adjournment of salts ("calcification"), or something LIKE the Reuters syndrome, but, as far as I understand now: he bluffed. If he would rule out only one type of joints-ligaments calcification - he could be right, but he insisted on the absence and "impossibility" of calcification in general, and this was nonsense (the following ultrasounds and X-Rays soon found more evidence of calcification).


If Dr. Ury Krasny let me know about MRI result-report, as promised, or (if he really did not receive it) - MRI"s result-report would be available to me in 2013, or, at least, in the beginning of 2014, I could use natural analogs remedies, having more chances to avoid and prevent further degradation of the locomotorium system.


Same as in dozens of other cases, another doctor reported NOTHING to me about the exam"s findings, did not administrated any rendezvous, treatment, or further exams.


Doctors not only did not care to report about tests' and diagnostic exams' results-reports to their patient, but, on the contrary, HID from me:


1) liver problems (abnormalities in indexes of liver function in the routine analyses and pathologies found by X-Rays and ultrasound tests), which was necessary to treat;

2) the reports of laboratory analysis, which found urological infections, which was necessary to treat (prescribing antibiotics, etc.);

3) dysfunction (even if insignificant) of the thyroid gland, which was necessary to treat;

4) obvious symptoms of a gastrointestinal virus, which was necessary to treat;

5) other gastroenterological problems (danger of systematic diarrhea or constipation, internal varicosity, etc.), which was necessary to treat;

6) dermatitis - with ulcerations (bringing real torture), related to gastrointestinal virus (which detection was sabotaged by both doctors and laboratories) - because of which I could not and cannot sit up to this day (2013) for months (only to stand or lie on one side, not on my back), and which dozens of symptoms include wetting and decaying skin, intolerable itching and burning, bright redness and damage to veins and capillaries - which should have be treated by antibiotics;

7) the beginning of pre-diabetes - which is necessary to treat;

8) the arthritis, which touched and affected all skeletal system, which is necessary to treat;

9) the mutation of transit cells (detected in 2004, and then - repeatedly - 2 more times in 2010-th);

10) the abnormally high leukocytosis (and other hematological abnormalities - after strange and extreme vertigo) - which should be watched, at least;

11) dangerous veins injury (when I was hit by car in 2007), which could lead to amputation or even to death;

12) thrombocytopenia and other abnormalities in hematologic indexes;

13) cardiovascular problems - which was necessary to treat;

14) and a number of other medical emergences, which were a consequence of other uncured problems - and which was necessary to treat, too.


At the same time, since 2001, ALL doctors (whom I visited), have refused for years - for unclear reasons - tests and exams, necessary for confirmation or exclusion of a) Reuters syndrome, b) gastrointestinal virus (I asked for a repeated endoscopy (the report of the previous one just vanished!), and other diagnostic tests.


Only in 2011, one familiar cardiologist from Dagestan, according to my description of symptoms, and his colleagues" consultation, suspected "Reuters syndrome", or "something similar". But, since 2001, without knowing its specific name, I, nevertheless, actually described it to doctors verbally and in the written notes, suggesting about a link between the initial urological infection of 2001 - and:


1) conjunctivitis (2001, and later, after 2004, recurred) and watering eyes, especially on wind and at a low temperature;

2) arthritis (since 2001);

3) urethritis (since 2001);

4) damages of skin and mucous (since 2001);

5) reddening and posterization of heels of both legs;

6) during the attacks of arthritis the joints become hot to the touch.


Top-class doctors could easily connect all the dots, and to conclude a right diagnosis, which could suggest a right treatment. Thus, doctors perfectly knew what constitutes and fuels the illness, which was destroying my life, but - at the same time - not only did not name to me the diagnosis, but even denied it, when (since 2011) I began to name it myself. ALL doctors as one, nearly 5 years, refused to order tests, which could confirm or exclude my own suggestion.


On October 16, 2013, I passed the MRI test, and in the same day (it cannot be just coincidental with no reason!) the detachment of the vitreous body (the left eye) started.


For almost 2 years, the result-report of this MRI was inaccessible for me, and was considered "missing". Only on May 8, 2015, I managed to recover it from the medical archive, and I have well-grounded suspicions that, if I arrived few minutes later, it would be taken away from the archive and hidden from me again.


Since December, 2012, I had purulent and non-purulent folliculitis (with intolerable itching), with a frequency of recurrences of 3-4 weeks. (For the first time, it appeared in 1992, in one country with hot climate (as well as hypertension); but in Montreal it immediately disappeared, till January 2001; an undeniable connection to the initial urological infection).


Since January 2013 (since the 2-nd extreme vertigo) there were abscesses in the ears and in the nose; throat pain - for unknown reasons - (microbiology, ultrasonography, etc., concluded - "no pathology"); intolerable ligament and feet pain (in the total absence of rheumatoid arthritis and significant bone-joints damage): and this is not a complete list.


I must add to this (not complete!) list of longer indispositions innumerous short-time, every day appearing and then disappearing FOREVER - TEMPORAL problems.


Since 2003: there were bones and joints permanent problems, and the x-rays, MRIs, ultrasounds at first confirmed a number of pathologies, and then, later exams did not find these permanent pathologies any more (they have been "resolved" by themselves?); and - as before - no diagnosis to explain permanent pain (sometimes: unbearable pain!), sometimes - significantly reduces movement functionality, and suffering. No "arthritis", no "rheumatism", no "tendinitis", no "osteoporosis", no "hypertrophic arthritis", no "septic arthritis" or "osteomyeltitis", etc.


Why ONLY a rheumatologist of Armenian origin has pronounced a number of the exact diagnosis years later?


Why some of the earlier x-rays, MRI-s, and ultrasounds have detected few pathologies, which "disappeared" in the later scans" reports?


Crystallization (calcification) and deposits (toffee, sophitis) happen in case of adjournment of salts, and, sometimes, when the concentration of uric acid goes down, they disappear. If this was my case, then why doctors never prescribed Allopyrinol, why they never suggested any diet, why they did not name any diagnosis? What is the matter?


If this were the adjournments of salts: why did not differentiate crystallization and calcification (2 varieties of adjournment of salts: gout and "pseudo"-gout)? If it was NOT an adjournment of salts: why did not order tests and exams on detection of other types of arthritis, including something LIKE the Reuters syndrome. As for the Reuters syndrome: the analyses are very cheap and simple, and there are no reasons or occasions to refuse them.


Why ALL doctors ALWAYS refused the bone density scan? (And, when it was administrated, it was sabotaged by the medical imaging department or private radiologes). Could such a scan reveal something that doctors were hiding from me? Or, maybe, there is a very serious contraindication, which doctors did not want to talk about, because it would reveal something that they were hiding from me?


In January - rather deep cut on the palm (after awakening). The most logical explanation - a certain infection (possibly, rare damage of skin leaving KIND OF scars). Hardly noticeable fresh scar went like a band: as if something wafer-thin left a cut - a very narrow, but a deep wound. I came to Emergency Room for other reasons, but complained also about this inexplicable scar. I vainly begged them to make a check on an infection. They were obsessed - that I, say, got a razor cut. I explained them in vain that I have no razor.


Starting from January 2013, the pain in knees, elbows, feet, cartilages or bones of the hip pin on both sides, etc. - returned. (Not at the same time; manifesting as a "serial" monoarthritis).


I succeeded to book an appointment with the rheumatologist (Dr. Krasny). As I already mentioned, he order (on my demand) an MRI-scan, but also a blood test for, allegedly, Reuters syndrome. Both MRI and this blood test report-result were "missing" (this MRI has emerged 2 years later, but the blood test: never emerged).


Later, doing a complete audit of medical documents in my personal archive and browsing the attributes of Dr. Krasny"s requisition, I found no connected to Reuters syndrome checkmarks in this requisition of Dr. Krasny. It means that Dr. Krasny, telling me that he sends me for blood test for rheumatoid factor, C-reactin, etc., AND "Reuters syndrome", actually, to put it mildly, misinformed me, or, during our conversation, forgot to put an appropriate checkmarks in the requisition paper. However, because similar incidents happened a number of times, and with other doctors as well, I would rather thing that Dr. Krasny did it deliberately.


CHAPTER 4.


FEBRUARY, 2013.


On February 23, 2013, I bought a bicycle in one of Kostko network stores. A person of approximately 46 years old, in store"s uniform red jacket approached me, and suddenly photographed me together with the bicycle.


When I asked the worker (who was preparing the bicycle for me), who was someone that photographed me, he answered that the "photographer" does not work in Kostko, but comes "in such an appearance to buy". But in that case, he shall be immediately stopped by the security staff for violation of the rules!


It is obvious that the worker was concealing something, and this was felt also in his intonation.


Probably, police used these photos later for identifying me with this bike. (The later events (described in other parts of my chronicle) confirmed this). The man, who photographed me with the bicycle in this Kostko store, was a police officer.


Besides, the bike was cunningly and deliberately screwed up in Kostko store to make it not functional at 2-nd or 3-rd bike ride. Thus, everything appears extremely clearly. Possibly, it was "allowed" to me to buy only an absolutely certain bicycle. By the time of the purchase, there were only 3 bicycles. I selected one, and my wife called the worker, who claimed that the exemplar selected by me is faulty, and displayed for me an alternative one. So, not me, but the employee has actually selected the bicycle, and then suspiciously long pottered with it (twisted braking clamps), and - at this time - another person in a jacket of Kostko photographed me. This act of terrorism (diversion) aimed to leave me without bicycle.


MARCH, 2013.


2 days our phone and Internet did not work at all (was disconnected by the telephone-Internet providers).


APRIL, 2013.


A Dodge car of that same model as the police vehicle 70-47 (traffic security) began "to cut" me (to intercept me) often in the key points. The police car 70-47 has attract my attention since August 2010, when, for example, on August 25, 2010 (approximately at 16:07, at the angle of Peele and Rene-Levesque); on April 7, 2013 (08.24, at the entrance on high-speed Decarie Road); on the same day in the evening - someone used it for shadowing me. [An editing remark: thus, not occasionally, this police car (70-47) was used later to issue an illegal fine for my wife (she was driving our car by then). The municipal court later eliminated the fine, confirming that it was an illegal fine ticket.]


MAY, 2013.


In the 20-th of May, 2013, I went out for a walk at 6 in the morning, and - when passed the narrow alley-passage between 2 houses - a motorcyclist jumped out towards me. This freak would blow me down - it definitely was his intention. I will not describe in details how I evaded a collision. At that moment my head hardly thought, only reflexes worked. On my happiness, a 2-nd attempt did not happen. I peeled skin on 2 fingers, and got a mild sprain (fortunately, got off only with it). On one of the scratched fingers the HPV virus lodged: approximately since May 22, 2013 - a strange "warty" sealing on the long finger of the right hand. (At first, the small speck was outlined).


JUNE, 2013.


I tried to reduce the warty "speck" on the right hand"s long finger by pharmaceutical means (bought in pharmacy) and by "folk"s" remedies: without any success.


Along with the strange finger wart, other dermatological problems became aggravated, and, in particular, something like "pimples" on the neck appeared. This new growth burned down and "itched" - and cauterization by iodine did not help. It was necessary to resort to other methods - and, with great difficulty, I succeeded to win against this new misfortune.


JULY, 2013.


I describe the ordeal in the medical system with this wart"s removal (the wart became in the later stage super-big and super-strange) - in a separate book about the full dermatological saga, and how the medical system just ignore people suffering from dermatological problems, due to savage privatization and commercialization of the medical care. I had to remove this wart myself by a complicated and very painful self-surgery method. This horrific incident has happened because doctors (and, especially, ER doctor, Anna Cerrar (or Cefrar, or Crerar, license number 107043), cynically sabotaged any medical help due to this wart"s problem.


The finger after my removal of the super-strange giant wart.


On July 3, 2013, I visited my family doctor. When I tried to thank him cordially for prescribing Protrin in November 2012, he grew dark and frowned. When I reminded that - after Protrin in November 2012 - ANY of the symptoms and serious problems, which were present since January 2001, have (at least - temporarily) disappeared: he looked very angry. To camouflage such a strange for a doctor reaction on recovery or remission of his patient, he said gloomy - and - with an intonation opposite to enthusiasm - noted: "Well, well, now we see that it was an infection".


It was also unusual regarding his response to my request to renew the prescription of the blood pressure controlling medication. As a rule, the pharmacy contacts him, when the prescription is expiring, and both parties agree about the extension; however, this time the pharmacy - for some reason - insisted that I should bring a physical prescription (piece of paper). The doctor was indignant, raised the voice, and it was difficult to understand, his anger is directed at me or at the pharmacy.


He declared with his voice always raised (I never heard such a tone going up from his lips) that they shall call him or send a fax, but not to take away from him his precious time.


He put to my hand a piece of paper (fold over 4 times) of a prescription form. I did not doubt that this was a renewal (for next half a year) of the prescription. However, when I came home and opened this piece of paper - it turned out that there was just his fax number written in the middle.


I was already sitting without blood pressure controlling medication 1 (one) week, but such a turn extended the already prolonged procedure of receiving the pills.


On July 5, 2013, I visited the walk-in clinic because of a number of health problems, and was kicked out from there, without having any medical help, without any recommendations, without hearing a name of an expected diagnosis, without prescribed medication, and without having referred to a doctor-specialist, or to tests and exams.


At night from Saturday to Sunday - on July 6, 2013 - I went to ER for these health problems, but was kicked out from there as well. (ER doctor was Dr. Anna Cerrar (or Cefrar, license number 107043).


So, as I already mentioned, since January 1, 2001, there was no DAY, free from - at least - one bothering sores, so, that my whole life physically turned into hell. (But, I will repeat, after January 7, 2013 (unusual vertigo, vomiting, diarrhea, a headache, drop in sight and hearing, etc.) this hell became a doubled or tripled hell).


If there is no headache, then the blood pressure suddenly and sharply falls down to 100 х 50 (at person taking hypertension pills!), calling terrible weakness; if dermatological problems do not bother, then an acute UI returns; if comes a break in the attacks of arthritis, then mucous membranes ulcers do not allow to live; if the ruthless folliculitis took pity, then the next furuncle or abscess, or mucous membrane ulcers, or something else is knocked with torture...


My infinite visits to doctors just reflect the realities of the infinite torture, which drives me behind at least a temporary relief, and more it means that any homeopathic, alternative, self-treating methids, or pharmaceutical means without prescription do not help: otherwise my leg would not be in doctors" offices. (It is necessary to add my deplorable socioeconomic status, which is not allowing acquiring the best alternative treatments at home).


Naturally, the side effects and complications of self-treatment and treatment appointed by doctors, it happens, are not least bothering, than the fixed problem. But all this could not exist - if the doctors (obliged to help their patient) would render a necessary help IN TIME, and would not bring to a systemic disease, if - it is the most important - they would in time found and began to treat the MAIN PROBLEM, which provoked all these complications.


When I was going home from the doctor by Metro, some "skinhead" "unintentionally" pushed me, and I painfully hit an elbow. It is necessary to tell that it is that elbow, which, probably, suffered, when I was hit by car. It is the same elbow, which I struck during a walk with Yu., and his son, Dmitry, in the Underground City.


In couple of days (on July 19 or 20, 2013) - an intestinal (probably) bleeding, on the same day, as one year, and two years ago.


From July 19 to August 14, 2013: neck furuncle, which was inspected by 2 doctors, who did not render any treatment and did not make any recommendations.


So, I was forced to treat it with home remedies.


In July 2013, when my oldest daughter was driving our car, some type on dark Mazda crashed behind into our car - hit and run. Of course, the most important thing is that my daughter was not injured. She, of course, had a shock, and this incident caused her psychological trauma. But the hit to our car: it is also a new hit on our finances. The car was several days under repair, and new expenditures.


CHAPTER 5.


AUGUST, 2013.


On August 11, 2013, Sunday - there were traces of an unauthorized search.


2 mini camcorder's video-cassettes and 2 discs with already digitalized videos were stolen. It was unclear, why somebody should exercise stealing (confiscation?) of the video cassettes from a camcorder transferred to a digital format.


Again, joint and bones pain restarted (approximately from the middle of July).


I was waiting to see a doctor in a walk-in clinic 10 (!) hours!


When I came to this walk-in clinic (on the corner of Sherbrook and Guy), it was overcrowded, with no places available for every patient. Everyone, who was arriving AFTER me, was called to a doctor, except of me. When no more people left in the waiting room, I was still not called to a doctor. As a result - I left home, without having seen a doctor.


On August 16, 2013, I succeeded to get an appointment with my family doctor again.


(A photo made on August 16, 2013, at 08:58 in the morning, displays the police car 26-02, which stands on the side of the street opposite to doctor"s office. This car followed me from the Metro to doctor"s office, waited against the windows, and, on the exit from the medical building, escorted me back to the Metro).


The doctor spoke with me unusually nervously - as though someone talked to him recently concerning my modest person.


On my requests for preliminary treatment and diagnostics exams, I received the following responses.


On Bones Density Scan - he refused a requisition, denying such an exam ("we send only seniors after 65 years").


On rheumatoid factor, followed a refusal as well: "I do not see symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis".


On blood and urine test, including Reuters syndrome - refusal, too (without having considered necessity to explain anything).


On the electromagnetic scan of the hip"s pin and cartilaginous tissues - refusal (without any explanation).


On my story that (in recent days) twice severe pain has immobilized me in the middle of the street (and I did not know - what to do: to call 9-11 (Ambulance), or to stop a taxi without having even 1 cent in my pockets): he advised to take always a book and to read it until pain passes.


On my supposition that if I"ll be immobilized while crossing the street, I can be killed by a car, he said "let"s hope that this will not happen".


When I took an interest in how to understand it: seriously, or as an inappropriate joke, he told that the best treatment is Tylenol (pain-killer).


After his words, I could just demonstratively leave - and never return to his office, but his long-term help and contradictory actions (mostly good deeds): retained me from such an act.


But I noted that if he does not see other solutions, except Tylenol, then I want at least to hear a diagnosis, then I will look for solutions independently.


If strong (and - sometimes - very severe) bones-joints pain is not a pseudo-rheumatism, - then what? Let"s give another definition or have an advice - from whom I can receive an alternative opinion.


In the past, a similar question always took him unaware; he screwed up his face, was confused - and changed tactics. But not now. His single reaction was the next: on a prescription form, he scratched a "semi-prescription" of orthopedic insoles, which I can buy on a discount - with his "recommendation" - for "just" 18 dollars. It was clarified later that, first, even with his signature, they can be sold only for 50 dollars, and, secondly, they are not different from those, which - during 5 years - I buy for 3 or 7 dollars in the retail network of Jean Coutu.


To treat the rash and abscesses he prescribed hormonal-antibiotic salve; however, this salve had no health insurance covering - because of the sabotage of diagnoses. The same as the insoles instead of treatment, or medications from his office (that pharmacies gave away as samples) - instead of the prescription of medications: all those tricks with the purpose to bypass an official naming of the disease (i.e. the official diagnosis) and a veritable government's ban on medical help for me in this period.


Any medication that has an insurance covering needs a medical diagnosis. Naturally, the salve, which costs nearly 100 dollars, certainly, was not bought.


After a while, the doctor answered to my complaint about the cost of this medication and my request to replace it with another, affordable: "Warm water with soap: is the best medicine". - "As in prison", - was noted by me. - "So you"ve been in prison?" - "Not really, and I do not aim to be there. But I can easily imagine what the prison"s medical care is".


The type of orthopedic insoles specified by the doctor on September 16, 2013.


Cream, which had no coverage.


Someone, who never met my family doctor, would wrongly suspect that the doctor is simply obsessed with moneymaking, getting bribes from pharmacies, private laboratories, etc.


Here, however, is a different case. It is not about money, even not because I am sure: he never did it in the past (well, people can change, or the situation changes). It is because most of his actions, his personality, and his nature - are convincing that (as a medical doctor) this man is an altruist, caring about his patients. Only something really weird could force him to act like he acted on August, 16, 2013. Besides, the facts are supporting such an assumption.


First, next day, when I went to other doctors, hoping to receive what my family doctor has refused, everyone did exactly the same. This already proves that something was wrong not with me, or with them, but due to some regulated directive: whether in relation to me, whether to a whole group of people by any given category.


More than few years ago, I just specified that, first - in the conditions of the totalitarian electronic tyranny - the authorities (social services, medical institutions, police, security firms, intelligence agencies, etc.) break the population (citizens) into categories ("cross-sections").


Secondly, the police - for years - escorted me on my way from my home to doctors (or to medical institutions) everywhere.


And, thirdly, the pharmacies "confiscated" all prescriptions, which I crossed over to the counter - just to clarify, whether this medication (prescribed to me) was covered by the state medical insurance. (In other words, they never returned these prescriptions papers back to me, and - on my demands to give them back - threatened to call the police).


In August, I had to call the dermatologist twice. For the unknown reason, one after another, all small-sized skin lesions began to inflame. And because it was absolutely impossible to book an appointment for the current month or two, in this emergency situation I had to remove them myself, by known to me methods. In my photos and videos from different years, the brownish "beads" on my neck (acrocordons) are visible. Today - they do not exist any more as there are also no "papillomas" (people call them "papillomas", but they are not all papillomas).


"At the same time" I removed rare (so far) eritremas and 2 large ceratomas.


In August 2013, two men came to inspect the smoke detectors: one - high, younger, another one - approximately my height, older.


They introduced themselves as employees of fire protection.


At first, it seemed to me that the tall, stately and relatively young: he is that type that photographed me in Kostko store together with the bicycle (see the details above - for the date of February 23, 2013).


But I immediately realized that that one, in the store, was lower and "smaller" on build.


And I immediately recalled where I saw this high firefighter.


In December 2012, day or two before the New Year Eve (2013), during my evening walk (approximately at 23:15) - I found a woman lying on the bare sidewalk and groaning. The frost was terrible. Along with me, a lady (who was speaking not Quebec"s French, but with the Parisian accent) with a big dog also approached to the lying woman.


This lady with a big dog had a mobile (cellular) phone, and - while she was calling 9-11 rescue service - I was holding her dog by the lead.


Instead of an ambulance, a firefighters" car arrived. So, this tall inspector was one of the firefighters, who came to save the drunken woman in trouble.


Here interestingly is that: let I first was mistaken, having taken the firefighter for the guy, who photographed me in Kostko, but this error confirms their behavioral likeness, that is the fact that the man photographing me in shop was from the same professional sphere - from such services as police and firefighting department. These activities leave a special mark on behavior of practically everybody, and for some - especially.


(By the way, the woman whose life we (the Parisian-accent-speaking woman and me) saved (without exaggeration): was a wife - or a cohabitant - of my neighbor (living across the street) - one elderly owner of a small business, occupying with collecting and delivering of scrap by his mini-truck. She is a troublemaker and, to put it mildly, a drinker).


2 other significant events: the sabotage of uploading of my musical videos to YouTube and Vimeo.


In August, our telephone line (and Internet) did not work for 5 days. The telephone company communicated with the state company Bell, and a specialist-repairman was sent to us from BELL. As I also expected, this technician did not even glanced into our apartment (the cat knows whose meat she ate), and straightly went to the telephone inputs distributor outside. He called me from there to my phone (which started working at that moment), to check, whether everything is OK now. I took an interest in what there was the case. The technician answered that "1 of the wires" was disconnected "in the junkbox" (in the distributor). So, his words have confirmed that I also expected. And more, I assumed that the specialist would not appear at us because he knows: we will bring up a question of the signal separator and the socket, which Bell installed in our apartment despite our disagreement (see the previous sections of this series).


SEPTEMBER, 2013.


At the beginning of September 2013, the acute inflammation and severe pains in bones and joints stopped. Whether the self-treatment helped, whether something else - it remained unknown. It is sad, however, that there is no (and not foreseen) any diagnosis.


On September 18, 2013, I was examined by my family doctor - concerning innumerous problems.


One of these problems was - the blocking of the right ear (or - more rarely - both ears) during physical exercises, or when lifting weights, or in case of the overfall of height, or just without any visible reasons.


I interpret that as a combination of several reasons, one of which is the remote complications of nose fracture in 1979, and, as a result of this injury - curvature of a nasal baffle. To address this problem, a long-term treatment at otolaryngologist or a surgery is needed. Instead of a referral to otolaryngologist, the doctor prescribed a special nasal spray (analog of drops), which doctors prescribe to almost all patients with similar problems. Not to mention that steroids are harmful. Not only that this kind of medications is potentially harmful; they often treat only the symptoms, but do not remove the problem itself, and do not cure its source. Beyond a temporary relief, in most cases it can be just like a placebo.


The prescription of Nazarex spray, written out on September 18, 2013.


Another reason for ears" blockage can be connected to complications of 3 attacks by an unknown remote weapon (see above), which can provoke brain injuries. I survived these 3 attacks in 2005, 2013, and 2016.


Then, it can be mentioned also the contribution of the cardio-vascular problems, and so on.


I started to demand a referral to otolaryngologist since 2011, but (during last 3 years) was always denied.


[The editorial remark: till 2015, I addressed with this demand not only to my family doctor, but also to a number of other doctors, but they always refused it.]


September 18, 2013.


At 09:58: the police car with the flasher appeared in 30 seconds after my exit from the Metro, and 20 meters from the "medical" building.


At whatever intersection I go out from our car, the police appear not later than in 10-20 seconds. Whatever Metro station I exit from, to whatever hospital I go, a police car always passes by very slowly in 20-40 seconds.


Already just on this temporal difference of police"s materialization after my exit from our car, or bus (10-20 seconds) - or from Metro (20-40 seconds) - it is possible to define that the police"s appearance is not accidental.


Not least important sign - that, along with the police, the STM (Metro) police cars or cars of the same municipal department, as police, but with other functions - accompany me (sometimes) to medical institution and on my way back home.


At the end of September 2013, trying to clarify a source of physical discomfort and painful feelings, I found something that considered an an internal condyloma.


OCTOBER, 2013.


I successfully booked an urgent appointment with the gastroenterologist for October 22, 2013.


But before, on October 16, 2013, I went to the procedure of electromagnetic resonant scanning (MRI) to Jean Talon Hospital. On the same day, in the evening, I noted that there were kind of "motes", or "floating objects", or such transparent "cilia" - especially well visible on white background in the field of vision in the left eye. But no attempts to get an appointment with an ophthalmologist (oculist) were crowned with success.


This new ordeal and all followed vision deteriorations are described in a separate book of this series entitled Who Destroyed My Vision and Hearing.


Here, I want just mention that the vitreous body detachment (left eye) certainly had to do something with the MRI procedure. It is not less important that - for more than 3 years since this dramatic vision decline - I was systematically and persistently denied the ophthalmological care. This sabotage of ophthalmological care had to be well coordinated, carefully prepared, deliberate, and premeditated: an action, which goal is to destroy my vision.


In the mentioned above 10 months of 2012 - 2013 I received a flat refusal from ALL doctors on the following requests:


..... I. Rash, chronic inflammation, and other skin pathologies: doctors refused a request of microbiological / virologic studies, prescriptions on antibiotic and hormonal ointment.

..... II. Acute, severe bones and joints pain, which was not passing for 6 months and then stopped "inexplicably": I got a refusal to my request of CT / ultrasound scan, X-ray of some bones, bones density test, Reuters syndrome, rheumatoid factor, prescription on anti-inflammatory, etc., and the MRI was sabotaged nearly a year and twice postponed (not mentioning that I got access to its report only 2 years later: in May, 2015!).

..... III. Suspicion on unexpected and difficultly explainable suddenness colitis: doctors refused all tests and exams requested by me.

..... IV. Difficultly explainable (temporal) vision problems: I was refused a referral to an ophthalmologist, requested tests and exams, and treatment.

..... V. Extremely aggressive and long-duration infection in the oral cavity: antibiotics were prescribed, but only after a long period of denial of any medical help and treatment; any probe of the nature of this infection was refused, including a swab test, which was also refused.

..... VI. Herpes (with unknown and inexplicable nature of its source): an ointment was, finally, prescribed, but only by a 6-th doctor, to whom I addressed with this problem, and only after a long period of complete ignoring of that problem by other doctors.

..... VII. Abscesses in ears and nose: all doctors completely refused inspection-exams and treatment.

..... VIII. The epic of warty sealing-roller: any treatment was refused; I had to remove it in a "surgical" way myself.

..... XIX. Intestinal, nasal, urological, and renal (?... presumably) bleedings: are completely ignored in Emergency Rooms, in walk-in clinics, in doctors" private offices; any tests, exams, and treatment - refused.

..... X. Twice repeated problems with receiving the blood pressure controlling medication in time.

..... XI. Strange skin injuries (as though cuts) on morning awakening: were totally ignored.


It is not a complete list of medical refusals.


From June to December 2013: sudden surge of numerous dermatological problems:

1) multifocal seborrheal keratosis;

2) big-sized folliculitis with massive rashes on the body and separate centers turning into true wounds (one of them did not heal from December 30, 2013 - to August 2015!);

3) other (small-sized) rash on the breast and on the back;

4) sharp and fast process of xanthopathy in folliculitis areas;

5) permanent contact (and other) dermatitis and dermatosis.


Let"s detail something from listed, and - in addition - let"s call the following dermatological problems:

1. Since January 22, 2013: numerous mucous membrane ulcers (one more of numerous indirect confirmations of possible exposure to intensive microwave radiation from an attack by an unknown weapon on January 7, 2013).

2. Since January 27, 2013: face"s allergy or infection (reddening, peeling of skin, itching, burning, etc.).

3. Since May 2013: finger wart of an unusual form, color, and type. I had to remove it myself in August 2013, due to an ultimate refusal to treat it by my family doctor, by doctors in walk-in clinics, by St.-Mary"s Hospital"s Emergency Department, etc.

4. Skin infection in August 2013 (Fucidine cream was prescribed).

5. One more skin infection in August 2013 (Emo-Cort cream was prescribed).

6. In August 2013: inflammation - besides bleeding - of the neck papilloma, which I had to remove myself because of doctors" sabotage to treat it.

7. ASkin infection in September 2013 (Cyan cream was prescribed).

8. Since September 2013: internal condyloma or acrocordon (disappeared after a course of Cipro in November, 2013).

9. Since the end of August - beginning of September 2013: an extensive purulent folliculitis on back and breast, with bleeding abscesses, not passing for months. I had to treat it myself, because doctors and medical institutions" sabotaged rendering of the medical care.

10. Bright dense rash on my back and breast since October 5, 2013, which "burned" and insufferably "itched". Again - a vicious sabotage of medical care.

11. Since December 5, 2013: both hands' skin inflammation after cleaning snow on the balcony. Long complication, similar to eczema.

12. December 19 or 20, 2013: new recurrence of skin inflammation on both hands - again after snow removal on the balcony. Except peeling, reddening, itching, swelling of fingers and palms - a red spot on the external edge of the left palm with brighter "grains" or papules. The spot - bringing terrible itching and pain - was asymmetric, abrasive to the touch little convex (raised), 2 cm in length, had firm edges. 2 walk-in clinics and 2 emergency departments refused any medical help.

13. Since December 22: literally an "explosion" of "mono-cells" formation on the forehead.

14. Approximately during the same period: 3 new lesion growths around left eye (see a photo - below), which I had to remove myself, due to medical sabotage of health care.

15. Since January 14, 2013 - but with a special phenomenon of gain in December of the same year: rosocea, which I had to treat myself, due to doctors" refusal to treat this problem. I managed to cure it only by the end of 2014.


Such an unexpected and aggressive process of skin infections, diseases, and degeneration (which, since spring of 2015, had reversed and "turned back"), probably, related to radiation"s effects on immune and endocrine system, liver, kidneys, and spleen, that, in turn, for 100 percent confirms the version of radiation by a strong directional radio waves radiation on January 7, 2013 (see the description of the incident with vertigo, vomiting, high leucocitosis, etc.).


The damage to my health on January 7, 2013, was, in turn, repeatedly amplified by (intentionally left without treatment (by doctors) the urological infection (2001-2013). The irreversible damage to my health was caused not only by the complete refusal of antibiotics and other treatment in the very beginning (2001-2002), on its acute and initial stage, but also by doctors" and medical institutions" (including laboratories) intentionally defective "diagnostics" and sabotage of "target treatment" (concerning a specific diagnosis), instead of which (and ONLY with very huge delays and only after my persistent fight for my rights) - they carried out chaotic and not bound to any specific pathogen microorganism, courses of antibiotics, 12 years held the infection "under steam". And, because the initial infection has "materialized" at the peak of my conflict with Immigration, after Immigration"s officials" and Immigration doctors" threats to infect me with an urological infection, as well as because this infection has manifested on the 1-st January 2001, the whole medical sabotage of its treatment can be interpreted as cover up and punishment by medical means.


Both catastrophes of the vitreous body detachment also could be remote effects of the radiation attack by radio waves, additionally provoked by possible artificial ultraviolet, laser, X-ray, or microwave radiation during the MRI procedure (the vitreous detachment in the left eye happened in the same day).


The foot skin reddening and posterization (2013) could be another symptom of exposure to microwave radiation (as well as symptoms LIKE the Reuters syndrome).


Thus, considering my complains to doctors Rohan, Giannakis, Zast, and to other doctors (at the end of 2000 and at the beginning of 2001) about the threats of the doctor of Montreal Chest Institute and officials of Federal Immigration to infect me with an urological or venereal infection, the whole long-term sabotage of treatment (including veins" damage resulted from the car"s strike (2007); 3 inexplicable vertigo (3 possible attacks using the microwave radiation) with the numerous side effects and complications; and dozens of other health problems after 2001) can be easily interpreted by cover up operations and classification (secrecy around the state policy (and foreign intelligence agencies in the Canadian territory) of the PUNITIVE health care.


The authorities deliberately tried to present my disagreements with the inequality, administrative terror, and injustice in the medical care system in Canada, and my declarations about police intimidation - as my "psychological", "social", or "psychiatric problems".


Because of such an SS-KGB-style "approach", my complaints and descriptions of symptoms were certainly made "invalid", and, to a certain degree, I was, probably, made (since November, 2000) "persona non grata" in medical institutions of Canada.


Illegal, unlawful, repressive, and false "psychiatric evaluations", as well as (directed not only against me, but against tenth or hundreds of thousands of citizens) so called "psychiatric profiling" - played a role of the catalytic agent in the sabotage of actual medical care, resulted in treatment (even not a treatment, but its imitation) exclusively of symptoms and complications, while the actual main health problems were completely ignored and exhausted inside.


As I mentioned already several times, the report-result of MRI (2013, left foot) was "not found" till 2015. After MRI, in the same day (around 19:30?), the vitreous body detachment has started in the left eye. (Irrespectively: the magnetic-resonant scan was taken of the LEFT foot, and the LEFT eye was damaged, too).


The ordeal of this new drama (vitreous detachment, the deterioration of the vision acuity, refusal of the ophthalmological care) is described in 3 books of this series Who Destroyed My Vision and Hearing. (In Canada, the ophthalmological services only partially covered by the state medical program; and for a free ophthalmological exam, I would wait for a year, or more; so, I went to Emergency Room (St.-Mary's Hospital). However, when later I came to a private clinic, and was examined there (and paid money for my visit): I was approached with the same outraged mistreatment and negligent, and was denied any follow-ups, despite the borderline IOP and other tremendous vision's problems.


For October 22, 2013, I had appointments with doctors and for tests and exams, for which I waited for months, so, I did not address to ER right away, and had no time even to glance in the medical reference manuals.


Among 3 doctors, whom I visited on October 22, 2013 (police - as usually during this period - "escorted" me to the entrance doors of all 3 medical institutions), there was also a gastroenterologist. He was one of the civilized and reliable doctors, who can be trusted. To my misfortune, he began our conversation with the fact that "only" a year ago I supposedly passed a colonoscopy (this exam was ordered at my personal request) - and nothing significant was found; so, therefore nothing now "can be" "out there". I tried to argue that, supposedly, in a year just "anything" "could happen", but he turned to this objection a deaf ear.


When I stated my suspicion about a possible internal condyloma, which was disturbing me, he made fun of it, and said that I probably do not know - what it is.


After a digital inspection, he said that there is "absolute nothing", and, when I asked whether he had in mind "nothing serious, significant, or dangerous" - or in general "anything" in a literal sense: he confirmed the second.


It is unclear for me how difficult was to detect this problem, but I gave a precise description in medical terms about its location.


Later, I visited several other doctors, all of them ridiculed me, and denied detecting any abnormality, and one of the doctors even said that, supposedly, "condyloma" is my "psychological problem", calling it "morbid depression".


As well as in innumerous other cases, my self-diagnosis later received a documentary confirmation, which once again highlighted unlawful insinuations of those doctors, who frankly exploit a criminal method of explaining real somatic pathologies by the "mentality of the patient".


On the other hand, this doctor (the gastroenterologist) told about disturbing, "boundary-acceptable" BP enlargement, and administrated a referral to an urologist, which I took to the central secretariat of the gastroenterological department of the New Royal Victoria Hospital (RVH), handing it over to the secretary.


In my presence, she called by phone the urology department of the same hospital and sent this referral by the fax there. Not just Dr. Szego, but all the staff members, all gastroenterology secretaries were nice people, and I had no doubt that they did everything properly.


However, no one ever contacted me from RVH"s urology.


[An editing remark: only in the very end of 2020-s I learned about the reason, when I, finally, got to an appointment with an urologist, and he told me that I am persona non grata in McGill urology departments because of my conflict with Dr. Brian Morris. So, these later events have proved retrospectively that - already by then in 2013 - Dr. Morris has used his enormous influence in the medical circles to block me any access to another urologist, or to a second opinion.]


Running forward, it should be noted that - done in 3 weeks - ultrasonography showed not an increase, but a significant prostate shrinking - in comparison with the previous exams, and the blood test (PSA) showed (as always) a "super-normal" (for my age) result: slightly higher than 1. That's why a prostatic abscess was the most possible explanation again, judging by the facts.


The reasons for such appalling, horrendous treatment of patients in Canadian medical institutions (and, especially, in Quebec) may be presented not only by the savage privatization-commercialization of medical services and the exclusion of whole groups and categories of people (defined by their economic, social, age, and other status), and not only by the political persecutions of "unwanted" individuals by the authorities, but also by the totalitarian politization of medical care in Canada (and in Quebec) in general.


Preserving only a formal "carcass" of democratic society, but - in reality - becoming a totalitarian state, Canadian regime - since 2001 - is involved in a desperate ideological competition with the East Eurasian, South American, and other dictatorships, some of which have achieved a big economic, military, and political gain. This ideological competition is not only about Canadian foreign policy, but mostly driven by Canadian elite"s almost anxious attempt to control (despotically) the rest of the population, while continuing taking away (from the majority of ordinary people) acceptable living conditions, human rights, freedoms, and access to medical care, and to increase wild exploitation. Like all the rival dictatorships, Canada (in reality: The British Empire, which part's Canada remains today) developed aggressive violent treatment of its own population, and such an intolerant, arrogant, violent nature of its internal politics generates the same aggressiveness and intolerance on the international scale, leading to World War III. The consequences for humanity will be catastrophic for EVERYONE, but today's savage dictatorial elite (in any part of the world!) is so avid-greedy and blood-thirsty that not able to realize that, in case of such a catastrophe, will have no salvation on the Moon, or in Space. As the resistance of ordinary Canadians is growing, the state ideological police and social inquisition is tightening its grasp on ordinary peoples" throats. Obsessed with propaganda and counterpropaganda war, these political forces are manifesting a growing intolerance towards just ANY peaceful resistance (and Dr. Morris, probably, one of them, seeing in me such a person, whom he does not like and in whom he feels such a resistance; he could learn a lot about me on Internet, becaming very hostile from the very beginning).


So, obsessed with propaganda and counterpropaganda, these political forces (possibly, including Dr. Morris) could foresee an effect of "plausibility" (unwanted to them) in my expected presentation of events, if this presentation will be supported with specific documents.


Not accidentally, Quebec journalist Patrick Lagace - in his article Je ne serai pas candidat in the Montreal French newspaper La Press (August 18, 2015) - emphasized that - though the tricks of the complete government"s control over the press were not invented by Harper - it was precisely during Stephen Harper era, when the government"s censorship of every printed (and even spoken-oral!) word reached an unprecedented level and range.


It is only possible to imagine how it enrages this brotherhood, when someone - by publications on Russian Internet - escapes from under their control.


I describe the increased police surveillance and escorting; spam provocations, which demonstrated senders" knowledge about all my medical problems BEFORE I shared them with anybody; intruders" penetration into my apartment (October, 23, 2013; on my return from ER (vitreous detachment); and other provocations and repressions in other books of this series for the appropriate period.


By the evening (23 Oct. 2013), after my eyes examination by the oculist (ophthalmologist), I noticed headache and heartache, which did not happen in the last 2 years. Whether it was an allergic response to eye drops, which the oculist and his nurse dug in my eyes; whether it was a combination of complications due to dilation contraindicated to high IOP? Strong headache on the left rather indicates that the IOP was above 20 or even 30, and the doctor not only performed the dilation, looking into the eye bottom (retina) while ignoring such a high IOP, but also sabotaged the treatment, prescription of IOP-controlling eye-drops, follow-ups, and more specific glaucoma tests...


Along with the vitreous detachment and the head-heartaches, the following symptoms proved to emerge since October 17, 2013: slight burning in kidneys and urinary bladder; liver pains; "pricking" in the right groin: as though there something was touched in intestines when changing a postural pose (since October 21); stronger pain at first in one (right), then in both kidneys; baggies under the eyes; sharp fall of the blood pressure (from October 16 to October 21), which later also sharply returned to normal; unpleasant feelings.


Kidney pain (it could be muscular kidneys pain, but I doubt it) lasted about 2 weeks.


It did not improve my spirit, which was so strongly suppressed by these events.


In other books of the section for October 24, 2013, of this series - I described how concierge took photos inside my apartment, ignoring my verbal protests and my threat to call the police (he just laughed). Whether accidentally precisely in a week after concierge"s "photo search" (you will not call it differently) - the municipal office declared that will send ex-terminators to us?


When, on October 25, 2013, I went to the walk-in clinic in the neighbor area, 2 police cars accompanied me literally to clinic"s doors. In this clinic, they did not call me to a doctor, until all people, who came after me, already left home after being examined by a doctor. There no more patients were left in the waiting room, and only by then they called me to a doctor.


On my complaints, the doctor said that he "sees nothing".


On October 26, 2012, when I paid a visit to my family doctor, the police car 26-1 passed by - provocatively slowly - exactly at the moment of my approach to the medical building. Police cars already appeared 7 times in a row (besides this particular last time) seconds prior to my entrance to the medical building. On the opposite side of the street - there is a gas station, densely covered by surveillance cameras. It could explain, how the police are managing to calculate the time of my approach to the building so precisely, and to show up at the exact second of my entrance.


By the beginning of 2013, the surveillance cameras - spying on patients - have been already installed in the building, including elevators" entrances at each floor, all corridors, and even at the entrance to the waiting room of my family doctor"s office. (Its installation became inevitable after a break into my family doctor's office).


When - after my visit to my family doctor - I went to ER, the police 57-20 (which then turned around - and left) demonstratively blocked my way for 7-10 seconds.


Here (below) is given the analysis of the blood test's findings (autumn, 2013); this blood test was administrated not by my family doctor, but, in the laboratory, I presented my family doctor"s fax, asking to send a copy to him, and also - later - handed over a printed copy of this blood test to my family doctor myself; but - nor the doctor, who ordered this analysis, nor my family doctor - told NOTHING concerning the elevated sugar in blood (practically outside of the norm), or concerning other abnormalities, and did not administrate any treatment or additional tests.


[I do not say any more about a very high bilirubin: doctors did not react to my worries about it in any way. But also concerning the borderline sugar (glucose) level [blood test December 14, 2010 (already at the level of the 1-st stage of pre-diabetes!)] doctors told nothing, ignoring my concerns about the abnormal glucose level in a number of further analyses (I managed to obtain copies of some of them only years later). And even when I - during my appointments with my family doctor - brought up this question on June 20, 2012 (the index of glucose (sugar) in blood (5.9 and 6.4): the doctor answered to my concern that 1) the index 6.4 is supposedly not diabetes yet; 2) there are no bases for alarm, allegedly, because, taking into account other indexes, there is nothing serious here "on scientific approach"; and that 3) after 6.4 level - other, later tests, shows a decrease to 5.9. He did not make any further comments (that, for example, it is necessary to lose weight, to change diet, etc.). My assumption that the growing level of glucose in blood can be related to liver, kidneys and thyroid gland problems (from the 2-nd half of 2001 reflected by analyses, X-rays and ultrasonography, and by the fact that the enzyme responsible for lipolysis is abnormal), and that it would be quite good "to treat these problems", he met by silence - and made no comments also about it. Exhausted with urological, dermatological, and other problems, I "was led" on his soothing-convicting tone, and only from the 2-nd half of 2014 sat down for texts about diabetes, its prevention and treatment, and "found" an absolutely "different picture", comparing to the fairy tales that the 3 escoulaps were telling me).]:


(see below)


CHAPTER 6.


NOVEMBER, 2013.


I describe the events around my visit (13 Nov. 2013) to Clinique ophtalmologique de l'ouest in other books of this series. (With dangerous symptoms, vitreous detachment, and the beginning of the close angles syndrome (which leads to glaucoma and cataract) - I was kicked out of this clinic twice, without follows up, treatment, prescription, and other exams).


Since November 14, 2013, I continuously tried to reach (unsuccessfully) one first-class "uro-nephro" surgeon (and, apparently quite a good person) at the old Royal Victoria hospital, but - at the moment of the fax submission - each time there was a disconnection. They elementary switched-off in the secretariat - or there were "disruptions on the phone line"? The sabotage of my appointment with this surgeon had the very dramatic consequences, which led to 2 (instead of 1) partly unsuccessful surgeries (which left a number of problems) and to unspeakable torments.


The urine test (November 18, 2013; related to my family doctor"s requisition on November 15, 2013) has shown low density (Density/Specific Gravity - 1.006), but the microbiology (microorganisms culture) test have not brought any result.


On my birthday (November 3, 2013) a new UTI sharp outbreak (recurrence) has emerged again, accompanied by hematuria (November 25, 2013 - blood-urine test has not revealed the causative agent of the infection, but has not shown also hematuria (that is highly suspicious). [As it is already known from my chronicle, Immigration's, social and secret services', enforcement agencies' and other officials adore submitting their letters - that are devastative for the letter"s receivers - on birthdays or on holidays of their victim more often; so, the recurrence of acute UTI AGAIN on my birthday - did not surprise me.]


On November 4, 2013, we were contacted by the municipal office, and the calling woman declared that - on November 5, 2013 - someone would come "to look for bugs' presence". I told her that we - ourselves - have made the most thorough inspection, and have not found bugs, but the young woman has ignored my comment.


Since the day of the call from the municipal office, our neighbors from the 2-nd floor, it seems, have left somewhere for some days, and - before the arrival of ex-terminators - it was impossible to speak to them (not to mention that it is problematic in general: to turn to people with inquiries, whether there they have bugs!).


Running forward: they later told us that have bought a brand new sofa in the Brault & Martineau furniture store, and there were bugs in this new sofa!


They had to thrown out this brand new sofa to the street - because the shop has refused to return the money or to replace the sofa by another one (without the bugs), and even refused to cancel the payments for the credit! This unbelievable story was, probably, truthful, because later I heard from a number of people about similar horrific actions of this furniture network, and even heard a report on the radio. However, in 2013, such things (which, rather, could happen before in India, Israel, or Azerbaijan, but not in Canada (especially, in such giant stores) were still very rare...


Neighbors from the 2-nd floor - told that, allegedly - have independently etched bugs very quickly, and - since that moment - no insects lived by them (according to them) any more. And only 2 or 3 months later, the bugs, allegedly, have appeared by neighbors (living over them) from the 3-rd (our) floor. Everything in this story had something fishy; something felt artificial, like a "setup".


On November 6, 2013, the neighbors from the 3-rd floor have taken outside a whole mountain of bags, trunks and sacs, which (running forward) - they left and for winter on the balcony. Since that day they never were shown on the balcony though before both brothers spent on the balcony "24 hours per day".


On November 7, 2013 (Thursday), I went to do the tests, and - again - the police accompanied me on my way there and from there (we passed through my daughter"s yard, whom we have brought to her work):


[Details - in the books of this series for the corresponding period, where it is told about several police cars accompanying me to the medical institutions: 21-7, 72-85, 78-10, 15-2...]


On October 29, 2013, at 09:40 - in the morning, I had a medical appointment in the hospital. At 08:10 (in the same morning) Canada Post car 07338, equipped by surveillance cameras (that same car drove also near the Metro) has shown up 30 seconds prior to my entrance to the hospital.


On my way back from hospital, the same Canada Post car passed twice, but before (the police car 70 (or 76) -8 appeared in a key points, there were 3 Canada Post cars of the same brand and model, but with different plate license numbers, which appear too often on my way in different parts of the city.


It is possible that it is the same car with replaceable license plate numbers.


In the evening, between 18:06 and 21.25 - the same car appeared twice and in my neighborhood.


On my way from the hospital, police cars 70-8 and 76-8 (or, most likely, 78-8) - "cut me off" in a "key point", when I passed by the backstreets alleys and yards to a big street. On my way to the hospital, another police car, 20-6, slowly drove by in 15 seconds after my exit from Metro. Right there also the same Canada Post car 07338 passed by again, which appeared also near the hospital.


On October 31, 2013, I went to one of the walk-in clinics in downtown Montreal. The police car 78-8 "flew up" to the sidewalk and sharply stopped slightly ahead of me in 30 seconds after my exit from Metro, on my way to the policlinic. On my way back, another police car, 80-46, drove by at the time of my entrance to the Metro.


I stayed in this policlinic more than 4 hours (!) until a doctor examined me. Everyone, who came before and after me, was received, but not me. Twice I approached the secretaries to clarify, why, but all the same I was held until no person remained in the clinic, except of me. I was forced to wait from 11:00 till 15:45. The whole "team" of people waiting for the queue in the waiting room completely changed 5 times. Those who came after me both at 12:00, at 13:00, at 14:00, and even at 15:00 - were called to the doctor, except of me!


The doctor, who examined me, did not refuse to refer me to ophthalmologist and also agreed that the disturbing lesion can be an internal condyloma.


Police car 20-6 obviously fixed the time frames of mine absence from my home.


On November 7, 2013 (Thursday), when I went to pass the lab tests, the police accompanied me on my way there and on my way back (we drove through the yard of my daughter to whom gave a ride on operation): [Details - in the section of this series for the appropriate date, where it is told about several police cars accompanying me to medical institutions: 21-7, 72-85, 78-10, 15-2...]


At the beginning of November 2015, I, finally, managed to obtain copies of medical formularies filled in by doctors and nurses (from the offices of different hospitals' ER, policlinics, doctors' public and private offices, CLSC-s, etc.). There was a huge number of remarks, notes, and comments not related to medical issues, which would be more appropriate to police or secret services' records.


"He has come alone, without company". A very "medical" subject! Interestingly, how did they know that I "have come" "without company"? What if someone accompanied me to the office door (or even to the triage nurse's room)? Have they spotted it by means of spy-cameras?


Or here: "He has declared that does not use the eye-glasses, as they are too expensive for him". In such a way, the medical staff can easily put someone on a black list, presenting patient's sincere statements in a way that they can be regarded as a social protest, and, consequently, it can trigger the organized repressions against this patient, including the corporate mistrust to symptoms' description, interpreted as a "mental problem".


Or here is such a pearl: "He has refused to be directed on consultation in the General Jewish hospital". After horrific 2001, when in Montreal alone 2 thousand people (per year!) were thrown into prison for a lattice on a pointer of one pseudo-ethnic masonic organization, when a 90-year-old man was thrown into prison for his drawing on a fence, such notes - they are not a joke!


After one of doctors admitted to me that he "was approached" concerning my modest person, similar entries in the medical forms place all points over i.


And - after all - each such a police-informer official report is filled by a medical worker, in the past - a person of the most humane profession!


The humanity has passed as a nice dream.


Despite their knowledge about my negative attitude towards ex-USSR and my ideological rejection of its hypocritical practices, most of the provocations of the Canadian Federal Immigration in 1994-2004, as well as the most repressive provocations of other enforcement agencies, were dedicated to 1 May ("Workers" Day"), 7 November (the holiday of so-called October Revolution (in Russia), Russian Old New Year, etc. Such a policy is certainly fed by pure racist sentiments, connected to someone's hate towards all origins from Slavic countries.


So, on November 7, 2013, police surveillance and intimidation has drastically intensified. At 10.26 - the police car 21-7 followed us (going slightly ahead) from my daughter's home to one of big streets. At 10.33 - another police car - 72-85, - replaces the previous one, following us. At 10.35 - the third police car, 78-10, waits at the key point, where is a place of crossing of a small street (from which we turn to the big street) - and a principle road, and, as we approach, starts following us. At 10.37 - the fourth police car - 15-2, - with the license plate number FHG-3457, appears on the big street - where we turn off, and stops ahead, demonstratively blocking our way for several moments.


It is curious that the police car with the board number 72-85 in other cases appeared as a car of another brand, model, and type, which points to an illegal replacing (or repainting) the same board number on different cars.


Around this period, I have arranged an unofficial meeting (which has been appointed to November 10, 2013 (Sunday) with a medical worker, who promised to collect (for me) the results of all my laboratory analyses' reports and other tests (done in the affiliated with the McGill University medical institutions), which were declared "missing". This medical worker also promised to bring me together with a doctor, who would analyze these medical data, and would decide what to do.


However, on my way to the place of the meeting, the policemen and police cars, and cars with the inscription "Security" so busily "grazed" our car, blocking the way, and even provoking a road accident - that it was necessary to cancel this meeting.


On November 15, 2013 (11.18 in the morning): the security service car accompanies throughout all way from our home - and almost to the doctor, and turns off few minutes before the emergence of the police car 26-8, which, at the same moment and in a pointed manner, slowly passes by in 10 seconds after my exit from our car near my family doctor"s office.


On November 15, 2013 (12.16, noon): the police car "watches" my exit from the Metro on my way back home from my family doctor. (All photos and other documental evidence data are gathered in my series about police persecution - surveillance - intimidation, see the appropriate section for November, 2013).


So, on November 15, 2013, I had a planned appointment with my family doctor. He has declared (after examination) that a lesion, which worries me, is not a condyloma, but a swelling of a vascular origin, and - supposedly - "an age mark".


He has several times repeated (as though copying the ophthalmologist) that it is an old age degradation, and that such swellings can appear "as many as appear", and no treatment is present and just not required.


I have once again asked him repeatedly - as he has mentioned "age marks" one time, and "birthmarks" another time, while both of them has no relation to vascular problems. I have asked the doctor to call the exact diagnosis, but he could not "pick up" a medical term.


By that moment I had already an opinion of 5 doctors (2 of whom - are experts!), and all these opinions were different!


2 doctors have declared that "see nothing" (they have, seemingly, problems with sight?!).


1 - as though has agreed that it "can be" an internal condyloma.


The 4-th argued that "it something such as a heat-spot", and that "it will pass away".


The 5-th has declared that it is a vascular problem (telling about it in the terms of a dermatological lexicon!).


Whom - then - I should trust, and who - after all - was right?


Despite all inexplicable refusals of my family doctor on my numerous requests, despite his many strange conclusions and a number of his other dubious and controversial actions, he, nevertheless, has did and does for me more than any other doctor, and directed me on such procedures and exams, which have been all refused by other doctors.


So, then, on November 15, 2013, he has written out the direction (requisition) on transrectal ultrasonography. What happened with this ultrasonography (how it was sabotaged) - is the further narrative, as the story unfolds.


This fact once again proves that everything outraged that happened and that going on was not an initiative of the doctor or a consequence of his negligence and mistakes. The influence and pressure upon doctors apparently appeared from the extraneous interesants and did not leave to doctors a choice. Therefore, all fault for the tortures arranged for me - lies not on medics (except for several of them, forming a monolith with the medical political clique and agents of the enforcement agencies and departments and their organizations in medical institutions), but on the Harper [Trudeau] regime, and, in much bigger degree: on his "chiefs".


On November 18, 2013 (11.07 in the morning): the municipal police car accompanies our car to a place, where I land - to go to a hospital. At 11.16 (in the morning), the police car slowly passes by and turns in the direction to hospital (where I go) in 20 seconds after my exit from our car. In 2 minutes the same car goes back, tracing, as I turn off and start to walk through the backyards (through the parking-lot).


Before reaching the hospital, I see from above that a white minibus approaches the entrance, through which I am ALWAYS entering this hospital (I see only its roof). When I come nearer, there is no one in the cabin already (left - or have simply passed to the back, enclosed part of the minibus?). It is the Securite Publique Quebec car, looking the same as from the pictures of the "scanning vans", i.e. cars, on which the same x-ray scanners are installed, as at the airports.


I already have no time to go around, through the other entrance, risking receiving a next dose of radiation.


On November 20, 2013, after the laboratory (where I did the tests), I have come to my family doctor"s office; however, he has not appeared there, and the secretary has told that has made an emergency appointment with the doctor for me on the day after tomorrow - Friday, November 22, at 10.00.


I have demanded, just in case, a card with the date and time on it, which has mechanically put into the pocket. On November 22, 2013, when I was near to go out to the doctor in the morning, I have taken out this card - and what have I seen? There was a date "November 20, 2013"! Then, it appears that the secretary not only verbally told me a wrong date, but also has written out a card "backdating" (i.e. has made an appointment with the doctor for the same day, in which I came there, and for time, which already has passed (I came from the laboratory to my family doctor"s office approximately at 11.40), and, besides, as she has told, "the doctor will not be here today").


On November 22, 2013 (at 11.28 in the morning): the police car 15-8 "cuts" me off precisely at the moment of my exit from the path along the canal to the big street. It happens on my way back home from my family doctor. That day I could not see the doctor though it was not mine but the secretary's mistake or wrongdoing, who "have mixed" the date and time. (See above). On my way to the doctor, the police car 26-6 "has met" me there.


It is far not the first such case - when secretaries of different doctors "confuse" dates and time, appointing rendezvous to a date and time when a doctor does not work as though deliberately deceiving or use different roguish tricks to protect their chiefs-doctors from importunate patients. This happens not only to me, but also to many people of my age, who have got used more or less to trust medical workers. Many of them are not bunglers at all, and, nevertheless, the secretaries manage to turn with them such tricks. This is one more of uncountable examples that in Canada, and, in particular, in Quebec, something is "not right" in the health care sphere.


It is necessary to add still that this particular secretary - a goodhearted and very diligent woman - who is drastically different from many of her colleagues. What, then, to speak about other category of secretaries, among whom there are real shrews come across! [As a bright example of a purposeful erroneous rendezvous date with the same doctor for obviously erroneous time-date, I already provided photocopies of 2 appointment cards in this chronicle for SEPTEMBER, 2008.]


Meanwhile, the epic with an "internal condyloma" (as I defined it; or an acrocordon), on which several doctors had diametrically differing opinions (from the statement that "there is absolutely nothing" - to inability to distinguish between a condyloma, acrocordon, and a "vascular formation") has continued. Now, the condyloma became already painful, physically uncomfortable, and began to be disturbing. By any logic, it became an issue of urgency.


When all repeatedly endeavored attempts to meet at least one of the same 5 doctors were not crowned with success, I sent a fax message to 3 of them, insisting on a non-planned appointment, and advancing my arguments. 2 of them have accepted me in the next few days. By then, in 2013, many of medical workers were still compassionate and human.


On November 24, 2013, during my movement by car and foot walks - police cars were waiting in the "key points" (the key points: are intersections with a main road, or 2 main roads" crossings; an entrance under a bridge or departure from under the bridge; an entrance and a departure down from a bridge; pedestrian crossings over the canal, or under railway bridges; etc.), or inconsiderately and even defiantly escorted me.


The secretary of my family doctor called after 20-th of November, and told that I should come - and, maybe, the doctor will see me.


On Thursday, November 26, 2013, I arrived (as the secretary advised); however, unfortunately, the doctor could not see me, and then the secretary has booked me an appointment to the next available date. I already left the office, and came downstairs, when - remembering the former misadventures - I pulled out the card from my pocket and looked at the date. It was written on the card "November 30, 2013" (Saturday)! Neither on Saturday, nor on Sunday - not only my family doctor does not work, but also this whole medical building is closed. The secretary tried to make an idiot of me again.


Having returned back, I showed her the card and the date written on it. She apologized, and told that she "was mistaken". When she took in head to correct the number in already written out appointment, I asked her to write out a new one on another card; then the phone rang, and the card with the odious date remained with me - as the physical evidence.


On November 27, 2013 (12.58 p.m.): the police car 15-12, with the license plate number FGF-5547, stopped at the intersection precisely at the moment of my exit from the Metro (half-block-distance from my family doctor's office), then turned to the street, on which I often turn.


So, on November 27, 2013, I showed up at my family doctor's office again, but he refused to perform a repeated exam, giving me instead a referral to a doctor-specialist, whom I could not access for a long time, and I managed to organize an appointment with him surprisingly fast.


It is necessary to add that - at my family doctor"s office - they kept me (on November 27, 2013) in the queue to this doctor for 3 and a half hours (!): some kind of a record of waiting. In spite of the fact that I came 15 minutes prior to my time, I was the latest, whom the doctor called into his medical bureau, when no patients remained any more in the waiting room, except of me. After 2010 or 2011, my family doctor stopped to admit new patients, and in 2013 he already had less and less patients, so, the waiting time at his office was shorter and shorter: normally from 20 to 30 minutes. I had an appointment at 9:10 in the morning, but left from there only (approximately) at 12:30.


Normally, the waiting time at my family doctor"s office (unlike in the offices of many other doctors), as a rule - maximum one and a half hour (at most).


On my way to the doctor and back home I was escorted by police cars: 15-12 (on my way from home to the doctor); 26-8 (back home from the doctor).


In the last days of November, 2013, when I finished talking on Skype to my colleague Evgeny Lel, - there passed a call from an unfamiliar user. Having hesitated for a moment, I nevertheless answered this call. I heard a monotonic, muttering voice in English, which at first took for an automatic recording. Then I understood that it was a living person speaking, but his voice was transmitted via vocoder, phaser, or another voice distorting device. I silently listened, but I am sure that if I answered - the dialog would be possible. It was something like a parody to an advertising or warning messages of danger of infectious skin and venereal diseases. I immediately turned on the video capture of the screen, and began recording. Suddenly, the screen began flashing, then went black, and the computer restarted. All recordings were lost. It is impossible to interpret this anonymous trick differently than a threat, with the subsequent hacker invasion into my computer. Restarting of the computer speaks about a very professional provocation.


CHAPTER 7.


DECEMBER, 2013.


On December 2, 2013 (at 21.59): a police car with a flasher defiantly slowly (with the flasher!!!) drives by 6 seconds after my exit from the Metro, then returns and (with the flasher!) slowly follows me.


On December 5, 2013, the antibiotic Cipro XI was prescribed, which removed the main symptoms of an acute UTI. The same course of Cipro made the internal cordyloma to disappear.


When I got on planned (once a year) reception to one of other doctors (about whom it was not told yet), that one confirmed my self-diagnosis. Thus, already the 2-nd time since the early autumn, the diagnoses declared by me are confirmed by specialists doctors though other doctors mistakenly called absolutely other diagnoses. Whether it means that it was signaling about their non-professionalism, or there was something else?


Most likely, something is very wrong with the sabotage of the diagnosis, as well as with the wrong medical diagnoses (when, in response to stated by me self-diagnosis, doctors declare their "counter-diagnosis").


As for now, there are no hypotheses or an explanation of this phenomena yet.


Being guided by the "sum of symptoms", the last doctor (see above) "put" me on antibiotics (Cipro). And here that interestingly: I am sure that the "sum of symptoms" was only a reservation, and, having told me that I do not have an internal condyloma, but a harmless "bead" of "a skin tag", this doctor thereby just bypassed a taboo on treatment. Perhaps, calling the false diagnosis, he did it to bypass a number of some taboos on treatment. And, therefore, he read the scenario of another problem. To fight against it by means of Cipro is the same as to catapult submachine gunners. For this reason, nobody stopped this appointment. Especially as Cipro - not such a harmless antibiotic.


A temporal remission continued also since February, 1914: against the background of toe fracture (right leg) in March, and the abscess-related surgery in May, which was followed by 4 months (!) of the postoperative wound non-healing and suppurating (up to the end of August, 2014), and the whole abscess-related ordeal lasted till October, with a complete inactivity of medical workers and refusal of any help by doctors. (I don"t blame - this time - the ER (St.-Mary"s Hospital) medical staff (especially, I do not blame two very young female surgeons (through, such young surgeons without experience shall not perform a surgery on such a complex abscess), but the secretary of the registration office of the same hospital, and those health services, which were obliged to carry out the post-operational treatment and to organize the proper bandaging).


(In the end of 2013 - beginning of 2014, I felt like the blood pressure controlling medication don"t work (as a placebo), because the blood pressure began to grow without a reason. Since February, 2014, 5 months I took not the pills (for blood pressure control), which I was normally receiving in the pharmacy, but the identical that I got via Internet. During these 5 months I did 2 attempts to restart taking the pills from the pharmacy, but, as soon as I began to take pills from the pharmacy, the blood pressure started to build up again. Only 5 months later, when I made the 3-rd attempt (receiving the 5-th monthly doze at the counter), it was successful. In 2014, I thought that it was a terrorist act against my health, but later I heard from people that some small pharmacies, as well as some of this pharmacy chain, in 2010-s sometimes delivered expired medications. I had also a chance to experience it myself, when I bought non-prescribed drugs and products in 3 different pharmacies, and discovered that they already expired. Such things were unimaginable in Canada before 2010-s!).


During my routine evening walk on December 12, 2013, I was intercepted on my way back home by a very rare security car with a text "Securite" onboard, and with the same, or a very similar emblem as the Royal Mounted Police of RCMP (gendarmerie). This was Ford with the number EHF8344 Quebec. By agent"s uniform, equipment and secrecy, it has to be a very serious service, much more terrible than the police.


This car was first moving towards me, and then, having overtaken me at 23:55, turned around, and, at a snail's pace - with my speed, - escorted me to the intersection of the big street, in 2 small blocks from my home.


Having passed the intersection, this car stopped on the right side (considering the direction of my movement) of the street (along which I went), a bit further than the intersection.


In driver"s seat, an equipped (white) "gendarme" in an unclear uniform was seating, and near him, in the passenger's seat - a young black girl-"gendarme" at a computer fitted well. This computer was same, as in police cars: built-in.


A "Sixth sense" prompted me that an appearance of such a "steep" car watching for me instead of police, probably, is connected to some new denunciations.


As before - the police jump out as devil from a snuffbox when I approach to any medical institution.


Judging by my notes, photos, and dates of visits to doctors and medical procedures, within the same 6 months of a break in police intimidation, - at the same time there was NO time that a police car would not accompany any of my visits to doctors. As a rule, a police car approaches in 10-20 seconds after I get out of our car or the bus, and in 20-40 seconds after I emerge from the Metro. Many times a police car (as a rule: 26-...) was parked against the windows of my family doctor"s office. And only one single time - not a police car, but a car with a flasher without identification signs passed by in 30 seconds after my exit from Metro and for about 20 meters from my family doctor"s medical building. At whatever intersection I landed from our personal car: police drive by not later than in 10-20 seconds. Whatever Metro I quitted, and to whatever hospital I went, a police car always very slowly passes by in 20-40 seconds.


On December 2, 2013, a splinter of an imposing size was found in the small pillow of my little finger. Its appearance was generally inexplicable: since the end of November, I did not touch any wooden objects, was not engaged in any physical activity. For days, now I play piano, or write music behind the synthesizer"s keyboard, or sit at the computer keypad.


When I went to the doctor by Metro (December 5, 2013), I paid attention to suddenly coarsened skin fingers" bones. Literally, in 2 hours the skin there became rougher, reddened (something, similar to diathesis), and began to be shelled. Once the palm wetted - and skin began to burn terribly. Taught by bitter experience (see the previous records) I did not go neither in policlinic, nor to ER, but cured this inflammation myself, by my own means.


On 9 Dec. 2013 I had an appointment with an infectologist, to whom I was referred by my family doctor. The infectologist confirmed that it was an acrocordon. But such a confirmation, though answered the main, tormenting question, at the same time left other innumerous questions.


On my way to this doctor, the police escorted me again: police car 26-8. On my way home the police car 15-12 had escorted me from my exit from Metro to home [16:27].


Since then (since 9 Dec. 2013), police cars slowly pass by (coming nearer behind) - in 70 seconds after my exit from just any Metro station.


The visit to infectologist (see above; 9 Dec. 2013) has turned into, actually, one of 3 illegal psychological evaluations, with illegal "conclusions" and reports.


First, I asked my family doctor to refer me to a different infectologist (for social and ethical reasons), but it has appeared to be impossible, so, I was not left a choice. Secondly, during the conversation with the infectologist, the following subjects were raised up:


1) the urological infection since January 1, 2001, which was left untreated by doctors, and has led to all innumerous complications, has caused a set of other illnesses and all other problems;

2) the impact of this urological infection - its recurrences - on arthritis attacks;

3) the connection of this urological infection with problems of skin and mucous;

4) the same relation of conjunctivitis, watery eyes in the following few years (a short episode) to the same urological infection;

5) whether it is possible - on the sum of symptoms and by results of several analyses (which have found entherococci and helicobakter pilori), to assume a primary virus or bacterial infection that causes almost all problems in my body;

6) what special tests or analyses are needed to detect this "main" initial infection.


I also have stated about the short history of several infections with non-revealed source:


1) warts on the middle finger (right hand) - without contacting anyone with warts;

2) herpes on my lip - thus without contacting anyone with herpes, and, in general, having no physical contacts with anybody (meeting someone - I do not kiss, handshake, etc.), and also had no one with herpes in my environment;

3) extreme vertigo, possibly caused (as I have suggested) by either poisoning, or an infection (leukocytes 13 thousand, vomiting, diarrhea, etc.); I did not want to tell this doctor that my main suspicion was about the microwave radiation, knowing how doctors in so-called "democratic countries" are brainwashed, submitted to oppressive ideological stereotypes, and to "political correctness".


On my request to refer me to dermatologist, and to carry out a microbiological research and the test for a new growth biopsy - I met an absolutely unexpected response from doctor Semret: it has been declared that a "morbid depression" "forces" me to state similar requests! And, when I have made an attempt to sum up the history of urological infections, and came out with an assumption that their frequency and large number causes dangerous immune reactions (provoking a systemic failure), a wild hail has followed, which has torn me off, and it has been declared to me that I should address to doctor Morris about it.


This doctor did not order me to address "to a urologist", but - principally - "to doctor Morris", i.e. Dr. Morris was called by his name. Not only that the infectologist was aware that I am visiting Dr. Morris, but also special intonations in doctor's voice have forced me to assume that the whole initiative of the "psychiatric persecution", to which I began to be subverted in medical institutions since 2012, is somehow connected with Dr. Morris, whom I began to visit somewhere in June or July, 2012 (or even earlier).


Right there - after this hail and mentioning of doctor Morris - the doctor did all possible attempts to smooth down somehow this explosion of irritation by smile, by gestures and friendly words.


After that, Dr. Semret laughed, joked, and was not strained at all. Thus, Dr. Semret"s real behavior during this medical interview does not correspond in any way to the portrait of the patient (of me), which doctor drew in the official report.


Nothing more was discussed, except of 2-3 more pure medical questions.


And now let"s look - what the infectologist Makeda Semret (NOT A PSYCHIATRIST AND NOT A PSYCHOLOGIST!) wrote in the official report (probably, on the basis of the inference of other doctors):


1) At first, it is written (in English - see above) by Dr. Makeda Semret"s hand: new growth - HPV (human papillomavirus) - with the question mark (December 9, 2013 (see above). But, if it was HPV (i.e. viral infection), then this "piece" would not disappear in the very first days of Cipro course (antibacterial antibiotic). Doubts are reflected in the next line: "no evidence condyloma" (thus, my initial suspicions are also not deprived of the bases). And here everything is questionable. But what is simpler than to resolve all questions?! It is asked: what hindered all these doctors to arrange an ordinary swab test, or a sample on biopsy for the laboratories, or to carry out other simple and absolutely inexpensive analyses / tests? Intelligence agencies prevented?


2) "Bizarre thoughts, R/O Delusional State, currently calm and cooperative, no suicidal ideas". Here is an illegal and absolutely unrelated off-topic, not explained by the doctor, and not detailed or justified. There is no explanation, how this conclusion was made during an exam of a purely somatic problem.


3) Reassurance re ... skin tag. Psychiatric evaluation? To (...) with dr. Rohan (...) whether this is a new state or a stable psychosis". - A bizarre statement from an infectionist, without any explanation about such a bizarre "conclusion".


4) And, finally, the last fragment from Dr. Semret"s official report (I skip the top line): "Worried he is getting infected by people seeing to harm him".


Now, it is clear that my statement about the refusal of antibiotics in 2001, and this refusal's harsh consequences to my health, Dr. Semret interpreted as an accusation of medical doctors, i.e. as an attack against the corporate interests of medics, and, for repelling this attack, Dr. Semret has started own attack against the patient, fabricating an ungrounded report about patient"s mental state. Another attack against the medical system Dr. Semret could see in my words about the extreme vertigo, despite the fact that my words about infection or poisoning did not imply any suspicion of DELIBERATE poisoning or infecting.


This is absolutely similar to Soviet KGB's logic in "psychiatric" accusations against dissidents: if the Marxism-Leninism is the "most advanced" and "scientific" social doctrine, then only people with psychiatric problems can dispute it, and, therefore, every one, who criticize it: is simply a crazy person. So, they sent critics compulsively to psychiatric prisons, where the critics were killed or turned into "vegetation vegetable".


Before making any further conclusions, let's announce Dr. Semret's personal motivation that triggered this mean and dishonorable report, and nourished Dr. Semret's palpable furious rage.


Dr. Semret's name (among names of other doctors) appears in many of St.-Mary's Hospital's laboratory test's reports, and, thus, my official complains about some of the tests' disappearance, other tests' missing pages, or some other tests' more likely non-identity: have affected Dr. Semret personally. It is not excluded that it was exactly Dr. Semret, who was used by Canadian oppressive organs, or by the foreign governments (by their terrorist operatives) for distorting, confiscating, forging, or altering the lab tests. This suggestion is backed up by the fact that, at least, 3 other doctors, who most aggressively, destructively, and unethically treated me in St.-Mary's Hospital, and in 2 other hospitals, were also listed among other doctors on lab tests' printouts (see below the names of Dr. M. Semret and Dr. O. Sprull in the following 2 documents (fragments):


This is clearly an indirect confirmation of the personal motivation of the vengeance against their patient (we mean doctors Sprull and Semret). Still, it would be not enough for their outraged acts to become real. Of course, judging by their furiousness, they were very angry at me, that's true.


However, such a bold blatant lie and bizarre insinuation was too rectilinear for Dr. Semret's personal initiative.


First, it is very possible that Dr. Semret was in submission to Dr. Morris' smear campaign, which goal was to discredit me as a patient and to make my communication with medical professionals very complicated.


Secondly, 5 doctors, who examined me concerning this lesion, did not assign any tests or follow ups. Alas, this is a scandalous thing! Well, a patient decided to fight against it, i.e. to fight for his life? Tally-ho!


The third conclusion, which can be made by reading Dr. Semret's forgery: this is a group-collective creation of several individuals, because - otherwise - the logic and sense disappears. Some group of individuals commissioned Dr. Semret to compose this sample of their common plot.


In the former USSR and in other countries with totalitarian regime, similar documents were fabricated for reasons to put the dissidents into mental hospitals, or to discredit an ideological opponent by means of turning by a finger at a temple. SOMEONE, who gave this dirty job, normally remains in the shadow (Dr. Morris?).


What else indicates that this provocation was premeditated and developed in advance, prior to my visit?


It is obvious that each "half" of Dr. Semret"s every statement contradicts another "half": "Bizarre thoughts, R/O Delusional State, currently calm and cooperative; no suicidal ideas". There is a question: if AT PRESENT (that is, during the visit to the doctor) the patient "is quiet and cooperative", then how (and why) it is known about his "wild thoughts" and "obsessional neurosis"? It means: was it known from an official or secret report, confidential note, or an oral narrative by another doctor, or doctors, from some records in patient"s medical (or social, or Immigration, or whatever) file in the System (in medical institutions of McGILL university, etc.), or from Internet?


As an "in advance planned" provocation this document is also exposed by the next phrase: "no suicidal ideas". But who claimed the opposite?!!


On the most its nature "no suicidal ideas" is a typical inference of a doctor on request of other doctor (or doctors), or in response to certain verbal information or in writing containing an opposite judgment.


The crossed-out word is also exposed the "writer" (tales' composer), and, in turn, giving-out Dr. Semret"s first intent to explain - WHAT the "wild ideas" (allegedly, introduced by the patient) exactly were. But Dr. Semret, of course, refuses this first intention. Why? Yes, just because fairly reasoned: without having police investigator"s experience (who"s fabricating false "guilty confession" testimonies of an innocent suspect - who underwent a cruel beating) - there is nothing to undertake such an operation.


An alternative version is equally possible: even in the form of the quotes attributed to me, Dr. Semret was afraid as fire of these "politically incorrect" subjects. But in that case the phrase "wild thoughts" - no more than a phrase, which is not bearing any information. An empty phrase. Without having any explanations (and this looks ridiculously in the context), this doctor"s statement sticks in a vacuum and forces to think that the doctor is no more - at least: but a telepathist! (The doctor - certainly - reads the "wild ideas" directly from patient's head even if they are not stated aloud).


The following fragment - already about plans of provokers for the future.


Probably, already by then it was planned in the next year or two to arrange a very serious provocation, and, under its marking, to arrange a "psychiatric expertise".


Also attracts attention the fraudulent ploy of supporting an affirmative ("evidential") statement based on supposition stated to another doctor (doctors), deceptively provided as an "assumption", from which a "conclusion" is drawn: "Psychiatric evaluation? To (...) with dr. Rohan (...) whether this is a new state or a stable psychosis". On style, it surprisingly reminds the methods of paid and voluntary provokers of one foreign state, which arranged an obstruction of my works.


It is clear from the very beginning that the official report of Dr. Semret was a politically motivated provocation of a person toadying to the authorities.


And that the organizers of this provocation planned (already by then) another, more capital, provocation, which was performed in April, 2015, at the Emergency Room of Montreal General Hospital. But in a year "with a tail" - PRIOR TO events of April, 2015 - an illegal "psychiatric expertise" was already arranged on December 16, 2013, directly in Dr. Rohan's office (see below).


But why Dr. Semret, and not someone else, executed - to please medical and (it is necessary to think) other authorities - the dirtiest operation, which was considered, probably, below their dignity by other doctors? It is clear. If, by origin, Dr. Semret is a descendent of the origins of such a country where the obstinate are beheaded for "disobedience", doctor was ready for any dirty repressive share.


Now let"s return to the last fragment of the official report of Dr. Semret: "Worried he is getting infected by people seeing to harm him".


This is an only fragment in Dr. Semret"s report (beside the lesion"s evaluation), which is based not on pure invention, but, at least, on deliberate misinterpretation of my real words.


It hints about my description of the extreme vertigo and its possible origins.


However, in Dr. Semret"s report, there is such a "tiny" defect: kind of summarizing my story, Dr. Semret did not even mention it, but added own output, giving it for mine. During our conversation, I did not mention a word about certain "people", who would like "to infect" me "to cause damage to my health".


As I already emphasized, I never mentioned (to Dr. Semret) about my suspicion that I was attacked by a remote microwave radiation directing device, which caused possible brain damage, with such symptoms as extreme vertigo, vomiting, diarrhea, significantly elevated leucocytes, headaches, hearing and vision degradation, etc., but I mentioned about it in my Internet blogs and in my messages to friends. So, it is easy to suggest that the information "about "people" was obtained from some "outside" sources (certainly, not from Dr. Semret"s conversation with me, doctor"s patient): from my personal contacts outside the walls of medical institutions, from my correspondence with friends, from my articles and works.


And, thus, the provocation of Dr. Semret was a purely "political enforcement" action.


This is just another example of how some doctors are acting as political-ideological gendarmes, instead of helping their patients: devoting the lion share of their time and efforts in forgery, fabrication and slander.


Whether it is worth being surprised to wild mockeries in McGill University medical institutions' Emergency Rooms, to open mistrust to ANY of my words (including very accurate and objective symptoms' descriptions), impudent distortion of my words in official reports by doctors and triage nurses, to their not motivated hostility from the very first second, and to denial of medical care in the most urgent situations?


It means that the characteristic like that that Dr. Semret made, precedes any of my meeting with any new doctor, triage nurse, or other medical officer. It means that - opening my medical file - a medical officer sees something like "maniacal condition", "wild ideas and expressions", "slander on medical officers". HERE is the REASON of all my ordeals in medical institutions and intentional damage to my health by medical workers.


On December 16, 2013 I shall be visiting my family doctor again - at 15:30.


However, his secretary called me at 10:00 in the morning, and asked to come at 13:00. It was uncomfortable for me, but I did not complain, and even agreed readily - because I am always ready to meet peoples" requirements.


At doctor"s office, I was told that many elderly patients called in, and said that will not show up due to the hard frost: that is why supposedly I was asked to come earlier. However, when I got to doctor"s personal examination office, there sat, except of him, some rather young woman (but not absolutely of "student's" age), looking more like a police officer than a medical faculty student.


During communication, it became clear that she poorly - for a medical student - guided in medicine, in simple elementary things, that she does not know the common therapeutic terminology, and not able even to measure the blood pressure.


It became clear, that the secretary deceived me again: as it became obvious that I was asked to come "a bit earlier" "to coordinate" my visit (to the doctor) with the schedule of the mysterious female visitor - who is hardly a medical student and hardly related to "family" medicine (in other words, the high level of probability that she is a psychologist, psychiatrist, police officer, or police forensic psychologist, or social worker).


The face of this "student" was obviously familiar to me. I try not to be biased - and yet I cannot get off feeling that I saw this woman in one of the police cars that were engaged in the demonstrative surveillance. If so, the police sent her to my family doctor's office to reevaluate my behavioral patterns while escorted and intimidated me. It is possible that she was really a police officer, a police forensic psychiatrist or psychologist, social worker, or graduated psychiatrist / psychologist (whose skills to measure patient"s blood pressure and perform other practical medical tasks are not essential).


[By then, the official report of Dr. Semret (which I saw first only in July, 2014) did not fall into my hands yet, and, describing the facts on an outline of the fresh events, I - after all - was not mistaken, and unmistakably guessed that this lady (in my family doctor"s office) was a psychiatrist or psychologist. I can repeatedly stress that this visitor looked, behaved, and spoke not just like a psychiatrist, but, rather (it is not excluded), like a medicolegal police expert-psychiatrist, and - therefore - so obviously looked like a Gestapo "Aryans" of "Nordic type" - just as from the movies "about war".]


So, it is almost obvious - that, formally - on the basis of the false and illegal "official report" of Dr. Semret - an illegal psychological or psychiatric expertise was arranged now in my family doctor"s office, without having informed of it either me, or my relatives, without having allowed me to sign any document (a consent paper), without having secured this illegal expertise even with my oral consent, and without having told me about the visitor before I appeared in the medical office, and without informing me who is actually the visitor.


Whatever was my family doctor"s role in this dirty story, it is anyway unattractive. But, during further communication with my family doctor in the same and next year, I heard from him several hints, which can specify that all such "psychiatric" provocations were provoked and generated by "people in civil" (not doctors') suites, and somehow also connected to Dr. Morris.


On my way to the doctor I had no time for glancing on sides. The weather was nasty, poured prickly snow, sidewalks - slippery, and it was necessary to look down. So, I did not notice all the details of the car with the Securite word on it. It flew behind my back on a cross street in 15 seconds after my exit from Metro. I looked back accidentally at this moment - otherwise would not see it at all.


On my way back home from the doctor, the police car 70-41 appeared exactly in 20 seconds after my exit from Metro in my neighborhood.


December 16, 2013 (15.05): police car 70-41 in 20 seconds after my exit from Metro when coming home from the doctor.


December 16, 2013 (15.06) 2-nd police car - 15-12 - in a minute after the 1-st police car, on my way from Metro (coming back home from the doctor).


It is interesting that next day, December 17, 2013, when I got on reception to rheumatologist - Dr. Ury Krasny - there was a "medical student", too.


However, this "student" seemed "like" an "actual" one, but - after all - did strange things: forced me to undress to shorts, felt muscles, for some reason studied my head of hear, shone me on the top with a small lamp (without having answered a question why all this is necessary), etc.


I suspect that this "student" could be a young psychologist or psychiatrist, having no relation to rheumatology, but he presented himself as an "assistant" of Dr. Krasny.


I assume that - on 16 and 17 December, 2013 - 2 illegal psychological (or psychiatric) expertize were performed (without my consent) by 2 psychiatrists or police psychology experts, and that 2 reports were composed, in the best traditions of fascist dictatorships.


By then (17 December 2013) it was also clarified that the result-report of MRI (the foot scan) never arrived to Dr. Krasny"s office.


December 17, 2013 (14.00) - the police car 15-5 near my home at time of my exit from home (when I went to Dr. Krasny).


December 17, 2013 (14.01): a "chicken" car in a minute after police on my way to Metro.


December 17, 2013 (14.04): Canada Post car (with the camera) in 2-3 minutes after the "chicken" car on my way to Metro.


December 17, 2013 (17.25): McGill University's security car - in 10 seconds after my exit from the hospital building (the same car appeared twice on my way to Metro as well...).


December 17, 2013 (17.55): the police car 15-12 "meets" me near my home.


December 19, 2013: next serious skin damage: when I came back home after snow removal from the balcony, the outer surface of palms became covered by red spots, which began to be shelled later.


Any friction about a surface of some fabric or even about my own beard left abrasive bloody strips on skin of the inflamed areas. But worst of all was the red spot on a side face of the left palm burned down and bothering. Besides - there appeared - and did not pass - also an intolerable itching. Was it due to contact with the surface of shovel"s and broom"s pole, or an allergic response to frost, but that day the frost was not strong. Coincidence in time to 3 illegal psychological expertise (how else could be interpreted the official report of Dr. Semret; and what else could signify 2 other psychiatric inspections by - allegedly - students, after Dr. Semret"s demand to carry out a "psychiatric expertise"?) could point to immune system"s suppression due to the stressful impact of these illegal psychiatric evaluations. (I.e., one of possible explanations: the stress called by these illegal "psychiatric expertise" and persecution by police, caused serious damage to my health).


However, the chronic urological infection (with systematic acute UTI recurrences, complications, and their side effects), probably, also player a role.


In 2 following years, similar cases of erubescence, accompanied by swelling, burning, and unbearable itching - as though specify a certain allergic or autoimmune response - probably, were connected to each recurrence of urological infection. But it maybe so that - from the very beginning - this allergic or autoimmune chain was provoked by persecution (related to the chronic stress), body contact with some chemical or biological substance, or side effects of various illnesses and their mistreatments.


In 4 next days the dermatitis (or something else) in general began to pass, except for that spot on the side face of the left palm. Unlike others, reminding diathesis spots, this spot was slightly raised and slightly rough to the touch.


On the same day - December 19, 2013 (23:45): police car 72-3 - a pickup - with an ulterior motive watched behind our arrival to our oldest daughter's home, and - at 00:15 - a dark 4-door Toyota J53 DHS diligently tracked me, in an explicit coordination with police.


December 22, 2013 (14.22): the police car 15-12 appeared in 2 seconds after my exit from the Metro: on my way back home from the doctor.


December 25, 2013 (08.38) (possible, 07:38 in the morning: my photo camera"s time set once again glitches): another police car is watching me.


Since December 23, 2013: the police did not appear systematically and deliberately on the way of my movements across Montreal (an evident explicit connection with the Catholic Christmas holidays, but not with the removal of surveillance and persecution).


During these days of festivals, different security police and security firms" cars tracked my movements instead of police cars. One of such vehicles - Ford A0905L, with letters and digits of the license plate number FB2911 - turned to the street, which goes to the hospital [where we went (to emergency department)], for couple of seconds before us, and then stopped (obviously with the purpose to see who"s sitting inside our car). Before the turn, this car just stood before the lights (waiting for us?).


At my age (and even not only at mine age) any person can get sick with anything, and with anyone sometimes occur situations, when medical care is inevitable. But it is quite possible that - generally - I should not need doctors" help if not stressful persecution by police; mockeries, and harassment in medical institutions; traumas in result of hits by cars, bicycles and motorcycles; aggression of unknown "hooligans"; suspicious poisonings, infections, and other similar incidents. If - at least - once they would provide to me an adequate medical care, did not hide diagnoses and were not engaged in treatment"s sabotage, I should not have "strained" the medical system...


The medical archive again refused to issue the copy of recently made analysis, which was absolutely necessary for me for tomorrow's meeting with a specialist doctor. Then I went to the secretary of my family doctor, who also did not copy for me the same analysis (which they already received from the laboratory at my family doctor"s office). I had to walk to the arbitration office, to call a lawyer - and, after all, - with a fight, finally, received the copy of this analysis (I just made the picture of the printout by my camera) from the same secretary, who already received a call. But I paid attention that she got a leaf of the "original" not from the folder of my file, but from the printer, and understood that the authentic printout of this analysis could be already replaced by an altered one while I walked there and back. It is clear, that, in case of such "deal", the analysis - theoretically - could be already modified (only on pure situation-dependent deal).


Approximately, since November 30, 2013, I began to feel again that "I have a heart" (pain behind the breast). At the same time, there was tachycardia - one more "bad sign". However, I decided that these symptoms are not connected to cardiological problems, and have other source. Much more seriously is a pricking pains in the right side, in intestines - in so-called right lower "square". It can be connected to an old appendix seam (from childhood), or something in Hepatic flexure, or in small guts (by the unwritten medical rule, everything that hurts in the right lower square, is considered appendicitis until proved otherwise). Therefore, only in the second queue it is possible to suspect some problem of urinary bladder. Besides, this momentary (and immediately disappearing) pricking pain arises in case of changing the body position (when the guts or their contents displace - as is well-known to any surgeon), or when it "hums" in the stomach (which almost never happened before).


So - on the first place - are suspected the vascular problems of intestines. The ureter is further and ureteralgias have other nature. The same can be told also about a gall bladder. Hernia, too, apparently excluded: there are neither general signs, nor concrete symptoms, nor detection in case of palpation.


As always, police cars "saw off" to the doctor - and "met" me on my way from the doctor. And, as always, too, familiar "civil" spies on foot and "civil" cars were acting together with police. If a police car appears in coordination with such familiar-looking "civil" cars: it demonstrates surveillance for 100 percent. It is possible that such police cars are used, which are leaving or arriving to real "jobs", or speeding on a call, but - even in such cases - it absolutely not necessarily that these cars shall pass or approach, or stop in that particular second, when I leave my home, or exit a Metro station, or from a doctor, or pass through the door of a medical institution!


Meanwhile, both lesions (hypothetically: whether internal condylomas, whether skin tags (acrocordons) - completely disappeared on 6-th day of antibiotics. Then - they had the bacterial nature (Cipro is an antibiotic of rather broad antimicrobic action). If it really so - then my initial assumption was correct, and all 11 doctors (except of one - and he was not sure, and, besides, came to this conclusion on my suggestion and from my submission) - were mistaken.


So, it is possible to hope only for our own forces and for our own knowledge...


(However, unfortunately, people like me don"t have an access to most of the knowledge and have no financial resources to buy and use naturopathic or homeopathic remedies).


CHAPTER 8.


Meanwhile, ex-terminators paid us a visit, made preventive disinfection, but did not find bugs anywhere, except in the apartment of our neighbors-brothers (by their own words). These 2 brothers - the purity and accuracy itself, and in everyday affairs they are docks: therefore, it is more than strange that they got bugs.


On December 5, 2013, at 16:30, I was on appointment with Dr. Morris.


Due to the next recurrence, on my persistent request, he prescribed Alfuzosin (instead of Flomax demanded by me) and Cipro (antibiotic), but once again refused a referral for blood-urine tests and for CT scan, and for the test to rule out the Reuters syndrome (or something similar). Thus, instead of a treatment of a concrete disease, I received from him just mercy permission (and that bread!) on antibiotics, but this - in the absence of the specific diagnosis - will not help for a long time. I believe that Dr. Morris permitted antibiotics just because of the signs of pyelonephritis; otherwise he would refuse Cipro again.


Before prescribing antibiotics, Dr. Morris carried out a special "litmus" strip test for coloring from the collected sample. When I asked him what was shown by this "piece of paper", he answered (with an explicit reluctance to recognize it) that - supposedly - there "is" an infection. But, when I asked whether it shows an acute infection - on combination of components (meant: proteins, nitrates, leukocytes, etc.) - he grew dark - and became embittered. Then I asked him to order blood-urine test to reveal a particular contagium, and not to treat it blindly. He answered to my request with a flat refusal, motivating his refusal with the fact that - supposedly - I do "too many" "unnecessary" tests", and, thereby, "plundering the state" and undermining financial basis of the medical system in Canada. Neither before, nor after Dr. Morris, had I never heard from any other doctor anything similar - nor as motivation of refusal, nor as accusation.


Only during the persecution of my mother and me by the Medical department of the Ministry of Immigration just the same was stated by the vicious Immigration officials in the same expressions (they accused my mother that her state of health will demand special medical attention, and that it will be too expensive for the Canadian state and that my 75-year-old mother represents "security risk for Canada"). They also accused me of "not wanting" to pay for tuberculosis treatment, and, therefore, "plundering" the Canadian state. The forged "tuberculosis" diagnosis was fabricated by the Federal Ministry of Immigration and the Montreal Chest Institute (part of the old Royal Victoria Hospital) for toppling my immigration procedure. (See the 1-st book of this series for detailed description). This statement I heard from immigration officials" lips and saw in the letters received from the Ministry of Immigration. (See the "report" of this chronicle for 1999 - 2001). So, this alone is already one of the irrefutable evidences of some connection between Dr. Morris - and repressions, to which my mother and I were exposed in 1997-2003. But, anyway, Dr. Morris" declaration that he is refusing me a requisition for laboratory tests "because" I, allegedly, do "too many tests" is just outraged anyway.


I also disagreed about the prescription of Apo-Alfuzosin, but not Flomax. I told Dr. Morris that I already repeatedly received Flomax, which did not provoke any noticeable side effects, and that once Alfuzosin was already prescribed to me, and called serious side effects. However, Dr. Morris was unshakable.


In addition, I asked Dr. Morris to call my family doctor (whom he knew personally and was well familiar with him) and to clarify - whether there are no contraindications concerning Alfuzosin (in the light of my other health problems). But Dr. Morris ignored all my objections, and, instead of responding, absolutely unexpectedly, and without any connection with the discussed topic, suddenly told that I once pledged the word not to "overstrain" the system of medical care of Canada. I answered that never gave to nobody such a promise, and - only having come home - all of a sudden recalled that in my personal requests personally to the Minister of Immigration of Canada, in my messages to human rights and public organizations, etc. (concerning persecutions from the Ministry of Immigration and concerning our situation (nearly 10 years in Canada without any citizenship) - placed an emphasis that I am - at that given moment - in good physical shape and both in good health, and, thus, stressed that it is not necessary to spend public funds for me.


Thereby, Dr. Morris openly confirmed that his inhuman treatment (which somehow strangely coexisted with partially human treatment) was based on pure repressive ground, motivated by political, social, and property background, and originates in his idea, ideological, political, and class believes. And the tone of his announcement about mine "not kept promise", and the fact that he answered by these to my objection against Alfuzosin, in the context was introduced as if he specified that, supposedly, I "did not deserve" Flomax or that this medication is "too expensive" to the government (if Flomax is really more expensive then Alfuzosin) or "too popular and good" to prescribe it to people like me.


Here it is necessary to pay attention to one more part.


Dr. Morris has prescribed Alfuzosin in connection with my complaints about so-called "interruption" symptom, and that - with the recent recurrence of the acute UTI (an infection - which did not allow me living normally since November) there were problems with bladder emptying. Besides, I complained about pain when sitting. Then Dr. Morris performed so-called "digital" exam, and, probably, suspected the uretus abscess - because, when I asked him whether there is a prostatic abscess, he frowned - and answered nothing, but immediately prescribed Alfuzosin. This episode needs to be emphasized because in the most tragic (for me) period he stated in all medical documents (completed by him) that, allegedly, "everything is all right" with bladder emptying - though it contradicted to my oral and written complaints, and, probably, to the conclusions of his own examinations and tests.


Except my personal intolerance to Alfuzosin, I also reminded to Dr. Morris that this medicine is generally famous for as one of generating a great number of side effects. I also asked him to prescribe another alpha-blocker, which is assigned for the prostate's shrinking - that could solve many problems and stop unceasing urological infections. I called specifically a possible medication: Finasteride, combined with Tamsulosin, which has the positive feedbacks. In addition to oral requests, I asked him about the same in writing, sending these requests by fax, and asked to explain also, in case of his refusal, by what such a refusal motivated. But Dr. Morris refused to prescribe Finasteride and Tamsulosin, having done it in an aggressive manner and in a categorical form, as well as refused to replace Alfuzosin by Flomax though I warned that I will not be able to take Alfuzosin. (And, really, having taken Alfuzosin in drugstore only once, I took only a few pills, and did not order it more and did not update in drugstore this prescription due to reemerged side effects).


I heard rumors from doctors and patients that Dr. Morris is one of such specialists, who are let into the secret of BPE treatment, successfully forcing the enlargement to shrink - in most of the cases. Because of these doctors, who are making a fortune out of this secret (treating only the wealthiest people) - millions of men are subjected to long-term torture that destroy their lives. For the sake of enrichment of several moral freaks millions of lives are destroyed. Not only their direct victims, but also victims' families are suffering. Dr. Morris, according to many very informed people, is the best urological surgeon in Montreal for some of the specific surgical operations, and some of them only HE can do. However, he does not perform such specific surgeries disinterestedly. According to rumors, his private medical office and his appointment booking enterprise are just a camouflage for his shadow busyness of extremely expensive urological services.


And the very last nuance. The most blatant medics" lunges concerning my imaginary psychological problems began shortly after I became Dr. Morris's patient, and amplified after my second visit to him. It allows to assume that all 3 recent [2013] illegal psychiatric expertizes (which, seemingly, became a failure for their initiators), as well as the official report of Dr. Semret, and retraction of my family doctor in this dirty event: all this occurred not without participation of Dr. Morris and his aggressive pressure upon other doctors, and, apparently, blackmailing and intimidation, and thanks to his incredibly wide and huge influence in medical circles.


Such conclusions are confirmed by the fact that - after this rendezvous - I made every effort to pass to other urologist, but Dr. Morris blocked me a slightest opportunity to slip away from his hands to another specialist, and it would be impossible if he, or someone else, who stood behind him, had no such influence and power.


I have rather reasonable suspicions that - from 2013 to 2016 - Dr. Morris tried to obtain a strict control over my family doctor through St.-Mary"s Hospital and all medical institutions connected to McGill University: to prevent him from prescribing for me medications, or to direct me to necessary tests and exams in connection with urological problems.


[Thus, the actions of Dr. Morris and all those someone at all levels of power and in medical institutions, who manipulated and supported him, we may qualify as the use of the medical sphere for oppressive political goals. It was completely confirmed by the events, which took place in 2014-2016. (Editing remark, 2017)]


On the same day, in the evening, December 5, 2013, I cleaned off the snow from the balcony. At first, I took the broom barehanded, then put on gloves. In 5-6 minutes after the beginning of cleaning I experienced a sensation as if the fingers and palms grow dumb and strangely burn.


Right there, I returned indoor and found red spots on palm bones (where fingers begin), on one finger, and between the index and the long finger of the right hand. When I began to wash hands - red spots began to burn terribly. There is such medical phenomenon as an allergy to cold. It is rather serious and even life-threatening body malfunction because of which an allergic response to cold can result in serious condition. But such an allergic response (if to believe medical reference manuals) does not develops in 5-6 minutes (especially as on December 5, 2013, there was a very mild ("small") frost) and in isolated cases, but, without treatment, remains steady - permanently - all the time. Before, I had no allergy to cold, and (if to believe medical reference manuals) at my age its sudden manifestation would be very unusual.


Since that day, the coarsened and rough sections of redness (on both palms, from the rear side) did not heal and even sometimes bled.


On Thursday, December 19, 2013, I had to sweep away and reset diligently the snow from the balcony-terrace and to dig out our car. In the course of this operation it was necessary to undertake the pole of a broom and shovel several times barehanded. When I finished the work and I came back home, the outer surface of palms was already covered by red spots, which began to be shelled later. Any friction about the severe surface of some fabric or even about my own beard left inflamed places abrasive bloody strips on the skin. But worst of all the red spot on a side face of the left palm burned down and bothered.


In 4 days, this dermatitis in general began to disappear, except for that spot on the side face of the left palm. Unlike others, remaining spots, this one was slightly elevated and slightly rough to the touch.


From December 19 to December 23, this spot was asymmetric, plane (or slightly rose), and terribly itchy. Antiseptic (antibacterial) hormonal (steroid) creams did not give any effect. Probably, it means that if it was an infection, then a viral infection, not bacterial.


Approximately, since December 22-23, 2013, the flat surface of this reddening became micro hilly as though in 3-4 places the microscopic papules-pimples ripened: more dark, than the red-pink background surrounding them. The descriptions, most similar to this pattern, and illustrations of medical atlases speak about Kaposi sarcoma, or about skin emptyings called by a virus of herpes, type 8. If concerning the first infection (or inflammation), which entailed eczema, it was still possible to think, but whether it was an allergy to cold - the second infection definitely was not connected to cold. But the first infection (or an allergic reaction) was like gates for the second - it can be told with big determinacy.


I paid attention that, along with a steady spot on the left external edge of the left palm, a set of characteristic monocells (macrocells) have appeared on my forehead: a very unusual occurrence.


Approximately, since 2001, one such tiny "pimple" appeared there. Since then, this phenomenon did not progress. And here, these days, literally for several days, there was their whole colony. It is difficult not to suspect a connection to the spot on the edge of the left palm.


On December 21-st, 2013 (for the 3-rd day of the second infection or diathesis) Georges T-n (the yanger of 2 brothers-neighbors) knocked at the door - and handed an envelope with the letter directed to us. Before his appearance, 2 voices were heard below, at an entrance. If the 2-nd voice belonged to the mail carrier, then it is quite possible that Georges himself voluntarily proposed to pass to us this letter before it was placed in our post-box.


But let's go back to my health (dermatological) problems.


Besides Kaposi sarcoma, or others, called by herpes-8-like skin damages, several similar skin infections and dermatitis are described in medical literature, each of which does not promise anything good, but it was not possible to get to doctors in first 7 days! All dermatologists and other doctors were on Christmas holidays, as well as my family doctor, and if I poke again into the Emergency Room: they would kick me out from there with the list of specialists-dermatologists. Nobody is presently concerned about an infection that can possibly pass to other people and infect them: even to thousands, well and that? Human life costs less and less.


And yet, on December 24, 2013, I ventured a visit to one of walk-in clinics, where only 2 persons sat in the waiting room, and I was called already approximately in 1 hour.


The doctor prescribed an anti-bacteriological cream with steroids, despite my warning that a similar cream did not yield any results for 4 days. I asked to organize a blood test on virus Herpes type 8, and on human papillomavirus, but this request was also refused.


[This cream - Taro-Mometazon - was received in the pharmacy on December 27, 2013, but did not bring any success. The spot on an edge of the left palm from outside have disappeared much later by itself, or due to my own self-treatment: who knows?]


On the same day, I went to another walk-in clinic, hoping for a greater understanding, but, after learning what doctors receives there, I immediately left home.


Running forward, I shall reveal a "secret" in advance: just the same phenomena in the next 2 years showed that it is some allergic or autoimmune response, or both. It is somehow connected to the same urological infection, and amplified under the influence of consuming more than 1 glass of liquid for time, overcooling, or hands washing (if this "false" frozen skin effect appears on hands). As a rule, it"s most characteristic manifestations: reddening and swelling of one of the fingers (more rarely 2) on each hand, at the same time: strictly-symmetrically. In other words, if - on the left hand - the thumb reddened and swelled up, then - on right hand - SURELY the SAME finger reddens and swells up; if on one hand the index finger reddened and swelled up, then the same phenomenon on other hand is completely mirror.


Sometimes, this pathology appears in the form of red pimples, bloated and reddened skin, sometimes becoming a very extensive blister. At the same time, the "mirror" symmetry also in this case is maintained: if the blister at first appears, for example, on the wrist or closer to elbow of the left hand, then in half-minute (minutes) a similar blister is already visible on the same place of the right hand.


Other characteristic areas of the same nature are: foots (and toes) and "urological zones" (in a bit expanded sense).


I assume that pain and heaviness, and unpleasant sensation in the symmetric zones of the thorax at the level of boundary of lungs and bronchial tubes (slightly lower than the axillary zone) is not an intercostal neuralgia - as I at first assumed, - but the same autoimmune or allergic response.


THIS phenomenon (unlike reddening and swelling of integuments) has an effect PRECISELY since 2001, i.e. from the moment of the 1-st manifestation of the urological infection, "promised" by the authorities. (See the chronicle for 1999 - 2001).


The reddening described above and blisters - are followed by intolerable burning and itching. It is clear, that this phenomenon is in one way or another connected to the lymphatic and capillary system, or, on the contrary, affects it.


On the other hand, it is impossible to exclude that all these phenomena just were provoked by a contact to some piece of chemical or biological substance, which launched such a response for years.


A problem with the diagnosis concerning swelling and erubescence, with the accompanying burning and itching - is that in 15-20 minutes a blister and redness turn pale and disappear, and I just do not have time to show them to a doctor, and any of the doctors visited by me does not want to look at my photos.


Thus, in December, 2013, the doctors had a unique opportunity to see, examine, and study the nature of this pathology, and to issue a diagnosis, but they not only did not do it, but attacked me, raising their voices, and ordered not to come any more "with such a nonsense", and even threatened me. As for the reddening (spot) on the "edge" part of the hand, then, probably, this pathology had a different nature though, it is not excluded, it could be indirectly connected with the reddening swelling of the fingers or blistering, which definitely have autoimmune or allergic origin and probably well familiar - by their form and symptoms - to the majority of the "general" doctors (therapists).


The described blisters and reddening in different body areas during this period (most often - hands and fingers) are not just painless pathologies, but called an intolerable itching, pain, burning (as though hands are roasted on real flame!), and other feelings of true torture. I am almost sure that the most experienced doctors in 2 walk-in clinics perfectly knew and understood, what it was, but intentionally, for inexplicable reasons, pretended that "understood" nothing, and that "see nothing" "except a real nonsense".


Without having achieved justice in walk-in clinics, I decided to use the last chance.


In the morning, on December 25, 2013, I went to St.-Mary"s Hospital"s Emergency Room (in the northwest part of Montreal).


At first, I was examined by a doctor-beginner, a trainee (le stagiaire), a nice young man, who attentively listened to me, written down everything, and responsibly approached my problem. He did not agree with something LIKE Kaposi sarcoma probability, but, as soon as he understood that I used it just as the visual similarity, agreed, and also recognized a high probability of 8 type Herpes virus. But he added that it can be "anything": both rather harmless, or a dangerous disease. He inspected my forehead, having agreed that it is necessary to show it to dermatologist. He did not mind to send me for blood test on Herpes-8 and HPV, but told that he shall discuss it with his chef - the doctor who trains him.


When this doctor came, she, behaving aggressively and hostile, cynically refused

1) a referral to dermatologist;

2) blood test on herpes-8, an immunodeficiency, "oncology factor", and test on HPV;

3) referral to allergologist and immunologist, or to the test on allergic and autoimmune reactions;

4) a swab test.


If it was not an explicit sabotage of the medical help and preliminary treatment, what then?


Having stated my guesses about infectious or allergic (autoimmune) origin of skin "phenomena", I, certainly, "did not prohibit" the doctor to make her own assumptions-conclusions, among which surely (as I understand now) there shall be versions of autoimmune / allergic (that, however, almost same) origins of this pathology.


I will just list provided here (see below) photos:


December 5, 2013, 3 photos. Skin damage after sweeping of the balcony. (See below)


Next 5 photos: skin inflammation (infection) after sweeping of the balcony on December 20, 2013: situation from December 20 to December 23, 2013. Red asymmetric spot is less than 2 cm, deckle-edged. Rough to the touch. Increases approximately by 1-2 mm a day.


Next photo: the situation for December 23, 2013. Are visible: appearance of separate centers and formation of raised "knobs" (whether "micro"-papules, whether cicatricial fabric). They are more firm to the touch.


Some skin areas looked as cuts, others like attrition (scrap)-redness or rough skin - without being either the 1-st, or the 2-nd, nor the 3-rd. All these phenomena seemed like DIFFERENT dermatological problems, but appeared at the same time and - probably - for the same reasons.


Next photo - reddening and swelling on the palm edge: the status for December 26, 2013. There is some improvement as the result of nonconventional self-treatment (photos do not reflect it properly as it was shot by a primitive and cheap - "soap tray" camera). Despite increasing in sizes, the spot began to get out of the "convex" shape; the edges became less rigid. Now (according to my scheme) it became possible to continue the treatment by the antibacterial steroid cream - but here was a trouble: this cream ended.


Now, let's go back to ER doctor's mistreatment.


At 8:51 - the triage nurse wrote in her official report: Skin (5) Localized Swelling/redness (PSP) SMALL RED SPOT PRESENT.


But Dr. Ana Crerar (or Tsrerar) wrote in the final diagnosis only "Rash" - that can be interpreted in thousands of different ways, mainly as simply a "rash" though no rash could be traced on me at that moment.


The doctor herself marked in her official report both swelling, and elation-elevation of the section of the red spot over the remaining skin, and other dermatological features, but - concerning the nature and origin of this phenomenon - she did not provide any diagnosis, any concrete guesses. In that case, she, in principle, shall refer me to a specialist: to dermatologist, especially as the skin burned and terribly itched. Reddening consisted of kind of a "colony" of red papules.


Reddening consisted of kind of a "colony" of red papules. (See below)


Location, form, color and edges of the red spot on the external edge of the left hand. (See above)


So looked a "colony" of red papules in zoom: the red spot on the external edge of the left hand. (See above)


When Dr. Ana Crerar spoke with me, she tried to present the case in such a way as if I, cleaning off snow from the balcony, just "galled" the skin, but I immediately resolutely refuted it. Moreover, I emphasized that I shoveled away the snow putting on gloves. I also resolutely protested against her determination of my snow-cleaning tool as "mop", having repeated several times that it was a broom (a brush with a handle). The difference between one and another is very big since the heavy "mop" can really gall the skin to callosities, and the broom - it is a different story.


I started my conversation with this doctor by handing her immediately my written explanation about the beginnings of my dermatological problems. Having before herself a clear written and oral denial of her insinuation that I, allegedly, "galled the skin", and, allegedly, cleaned off snow by "mop", Dr. Ana Crerar, however, intentionally muddled my explanation, because in her official report she stubbornly wrote about "the galled skin", and about "mop", and this was obviously done with the purpose of misinformation and of taking away aside from the dermatological problems.


I am sure that any doctor, having looked at the photos provided above, will immediately understand that these skin problems are not cased by any irritation of skin or a body contact with a solid surface. Unless the scratch on the index finger is hardly explicable. These numerous dermatological problems of December, 2013, were not "separate", and, especially, not "accidental" phenomena (all doctors, whom I visited during this period, were eager to present it (and went all out to prove it) this way), but represented different manifestations of the same general disease, which also demonstrates a lesion under the right eye since December 28, 2013 (when it became rather noticeable).


And - again (with this lesion under my eye) - I came across a blank wall of boycott and sabotage in medical institutions, because ANY of doctors, whom I visited, did not want to send me for new grows removing procedure (apparently, bacterial or virus by origin). Doctors said that it is a "trifle" - having only a "cosmetic concern", and that if I want (I want!!!) to remove it, I shall contact a cosmetologist. It is possible that I would do so if I was a millionaire or - at least - just a wealthy man. (See the photo below)


The lesion under the left eye since December 28, 2013. (See above) The status for January 7, 2014. The predatory aggression of this growth is visible. The skin around it is wrinkled, cut up by radial tucks. (Later, after [performed by myself] mini-surgery [for this lesion removal], the skin has completely smoothed). The picture was taken after the beginning of the first series of the process of the lesion removal by myself. Doctors refused to help (to remove it).


The site of the main new growth and more small-sized centers (which needed to be removed, too). [The picture is probably taken on January 2 or 3, 2014.]


I had to remove this new lesion myself, independently, by means of special bone and wooden sticks -"scalpels" presented by one Chinese doctor; I also used Japanese wooden sticks with very sharp tips. I also used a professional scalpel, which was offered to me by a dermatologist, whose patient I was and who was about to retire. This altruistic doctor's trust in me, and her confidence that I have a stable psychics and "strong" nerve disprove all insinuations that unethical doctors tried to advance about my alleged "mental problems". Both above-mentioned dermatologist, and the Chinese-medicine doctor, who gave me 3 types of small "skin" scalpels, had to be absolutely sure that I will not injure myself, having good self-control and full lucidity, otherwise, they could be responsible for my possible injuries. They also trusted me, and believed, that, if something goes wrong, I'll not betray them. They also saw the results of my self-mini-surgeries, and were satisfied by the results, realizing that I am smart enough, and used their scalpels in a correct method. Everyone must agree that performing even a mini-surgery on yourself demands self-mastery and stable mental functions.


Removing took place so successfully that - after the "iodine therapy" (extremely precise locally), which followed the removal - there is no traces, no scars left behind.


If I did not visit so many doctors (including 2 dermatologists, and the ER), someone could say that - it is easy to tell that in the "epos" with the unusual finger "wart", with the "false" "chilblain" or "burns", and with the lesion under the left eye, - I could turn to more doctors, still insisting, that I could wait, and, MAY BE (!) could implore a professional medical help (which is highly unlikely - because, with the advent of the centralized patients" medical file any refusal of one doctor almost automatically means refusal of all other doctors, especially in MY CASE).


I measured these "lesions" (their growth) using tricks of good precision in all cases, and the finger lesion literally doubled during just 4 days, and the growth under the eye - also doubled approximately in 5 or 6 days after the 1-st attempt to remove it by less "barbaric" methods, and there were numerous additional centers of the same nature.


Whether could I - not a doctor - to know whether will the whole scattering of such "pimples" to populate and spoil my whole cheek (having turned it into pitted like by pockmarks wrinkled and rough surface); whether there is no threat of forming of malignant oncology; and whether it will be not too late "later"?!


The whole guilt for my independent initiative lies on doctors, who ignored my desperate appeal, who broke all human and professional norms and principles.


Thus, the act of the (double) sabotage of medical care and diagnosing - is obvious.


In a situation, when police are escorting you to medical institutions, and spies on foot and other "observers" (see the following chapter) are put for surveillance - the medical sabotage is a natural prolongation.


Hundreds of inflammations - not connected with each other, - infections (in case of normally operating immune system!), syndromes, indispositions, short-time diseases, terrible symptoms - affecting practically all organs: were ignored by practically all doctors, except of my family doctor, by whom, nevertheless, hands were tied.


There is no day without some brand new health (medical) problems, either recurrences, or acute crest of already "cured" problem. On this background, police escorting to any medical institution, strange disagreements and errors of doctors concerning the simplest things (aсroсordon, etc.) - do not generate an optimistic mode.


Now once again, I will walk through the main events of 2013:


I. January 7th, 2013: extreme vertigo; vomiting; diarrhea; improbably plentiful cold sweat (I had to replace 3 shirts and several times wiped it by a bathing towel); extreme weakness; fever; later - headache, etc.; 13 thousand leukocytes (in ER); low thrombocyts; nearly 11 thousand neutrophils (#NE); and other indicators of acute infection or exposure to microwave radiation (or another sort of radiation; or poisoning).

II. 2 components nevertheless are closer to the top border: - sugar level 5.7 (in some laboratories taken for diabetes), and bilirubin - 23.8; it is possible to assume that poison or radiation "have averaged" other indicators (that is described in scientific and medical literature).

III. The blood test in St-Mary's Hospital"s ER on January 7, 2013: 1st page (see the book of this series Who Destroyed My Vision and Hearing):

1) Abnormal (above the norm) leucocytes - 13 thousand (from the most probable causes - blood cancer, or response to infection, poison, or radiation).

2) Low indicator of MPV - deficiency thrombocytes - could reflect a significant nephritic insufficiency (kidneys failure), blood cancer, widely extended infection, either poisoning with life-threatening poisons, or a life-threatening dose of radiation.

3) The high indicator of neutrophils can mean: а) serious acute infection / inflammation; b) necrosis (heart attack related most probably); c) blood cancer; d) sharp poisonings with life-threatening poisons, life-threatening level of radiation of any sort.

According to academic sources (studied by me), a combination of these 3 indicators points to very probable exposure to radiation of any type, and, in particular, to radiation of radio-waves" frequencies. Especially, it is necessary to notice that the above normal 11-12 thousand leucocytes already needs an immediate, urgent attention of doctors, urgent medical examination, and follow-ups of the patient under continuous supervision at least for some months, but the leucocytes OVER 12 THOUSAND: it is an emergency situation demanding medical attention not less than stroke or heart attack. And they "have thrown me out" from ER with 13+ thousands leucocytes and other dangerous indicators, did not administrate any further control blood tests, having sent me home without having reported about the abnormally high leucocytes.


IV. January 28, 2013: next acute UTI infection. On the same day, January 28, 2013, I managed to get on appointment in a walk-in clinic that works 7 days a week from 8.00 in the morning to 16:00. I got antibiotics, which helped at once, but the contagium is not known again. On my request "to take a swab test" I got a refusal.


V. Among 3 doctors, whom I visited on October 22, 2013 (police - as usually during this period - "escorted" me to the entrance door of all 3 medical institutions), - there was also a gastroenterologist.


Such topics as permanent inflammation with ulcers (which prevents from sitting), suspected internal condyloma, and lower intestine pains were discussed, but that time (contrary to his usual human approach) he was not in a "discussion" mood, did not want to listen to me, and turned to my objections a deaf ear. On the other hand, this doctor told about disturbing, "boundary level" of BPE (enlargement), and referred me to an urologist, who works in the same new Royal Victoria Hospital. However, this appointment was sabotaged by doctors, who are in slavish submission to Dr. Brian Morris. No one contacted me about the appointment from the Urology Department of RVH, and all my demands about the appointment according to the referral were ignored.


[An editorial comment: Years later, when, after 2 urological surgeries, I was left without follow-ups (!) and without any urological specialist (!!!), I managed to obtain an appointment related to Dr. Szego"s referral, but this urologist openly refused to examine me, and told me that - if I "want" to have a urological consultation - I can ONLY GO BACK to Dr. Morris!]


Later (after January 2013) ultrasounds have shown a significant reduction of BPE - in comparison with the previous exams, and the blood test on PSA showed a "super normal" (for my age) indication: slightly more than 1. This was one of many signals about a chronic, frequently recurrent abscess, which was one of the main reasons of my unbearable situation and of my further very dramatic suffering. However, doctors (and, first of all, Dr. Morris) did not want to discuss the abscess and did not want to help.


VI. In January, 2013: pain in knees, elbows, bones and cartilages of hip pins on both sides, feet, etc.: has started to hurt me again. The rheumatologist (Dr. Krasny) ordered (at my request) an MRI test (I saw Dr. Yiri (Ury) Krasny on January 29, 2013), but the MRI report was never delivered to Dr. Krasny, and, till May 8, 2015, was considered "missing". MRI report was "found" only in 2015. This test found arthritis-related pathologies, always "denied" by Dr. Krasny. This is one of innumerous examples of "missing", "lost", completely or partially disappeared, or "temporarily missing" medical tests and exams (or other medical documents).


Right after the MRI-scan [Jean-Talon Hospital (October 16, 2013)], in the same day, I got left eye"s vitreous body detachment, which probably had something to do with MRI procedure (accompanied by the X-Ray).


On May 8, 2015, when I went to make one more attempt of recovering this MRI (a morning trip to Jean Talon Hospital), I came under extremely massive and persuasive police surveillance and escorting, with the involvement of "civil" cars and police.


VII. On December 5, 2013, at 16:30, I was seen by Dr. Morris. Due to the current recurrence of UTI (and ONLY because the infection was already in the kidney!), Dr. Morris prescribed Alfuzosin and Cipro (antibiotic), but once again refused a requisition on the laboratory tests and for the exclusion of Reuters syndrome. Alfuzosin already called serious side effects (abnormal heartbeat, confusion, lack of coordination of movements, pain in the urological organs, etc.), but Dr. Morris did not wish to listen to my objections - and to replace it by Flomax, and I was deliberately left by Dr. Morris without alpha-blockers...


Apo-Alfuzosin, prescribed by Dr. Morris (see above).


___________


Lev Gunin


THE PUNITIVE HEALTH CARE

[HEALTH CARE AS A REPRESSIVE TOOL]


BOOK 5-4


THE UROLOGICAL DRAMA. PART 4. [Jan.-Aug. 2014]


CONTENT


Chapter 1.

Chapter 2.

Chapter 3.

Chapter 4.

Chapter 5.


__________


* * *


The whole text of the chronological events and medical documents (under the name of "The Punitive Health Care - (Health Care as a Repressive Tool)" is available for examination only on the basis of the following contract between the author and the reader:


I (THE READER) GIVE MY CONSENT THAT, BY CLICKING CORRESPONDING LINKS AND ACCESSING THE TEXT OF "THE PUNITIVE HEALTH CARE", I AUTOMATICALLY AGREE TO THE FOLLOWING PRELIMINARY CONDITIONS [FOR READING]:


-- I am (at least) 18 years old.


1. I (the reader) is undertaking (commit myself) not to distribute the text of "The Punitive Health Care - (Health Care as a Repressive Tool)" - entirely, or in fragments; not to copy medical documents; and not to share the text and images without author' permission.


2. I (the reader) understand that the confidential information, which is contained in this text, cannot be used for any other [than the reading (extraneous; secondary)] purposes and needs, for any researches, essays, stories, etc.


3. I (the reader) commit myself not to sneer at open ticklish personal information (which sharing was induced by circumstances), not to savor any medical, physiological, or anatomic details, and not to use this text as a reason for mockery and persecution.


4. I (the reader) am warned by the author that, except for a number of obviously immoral (by definition) doctors' and medical staff's actions, other decisions and acts described in this "confession" are not subjected to hasty moral assessment because a) only experts can judge finally about their justification and fairness; b) explanations and vindications of other party are necessary. We also do not know to what degree the doctors were under an influence and direct power of police, Ministry of Immigration, and other enforcement agencies, political organizations, groups and persons - with their own ideological, economic, and propaganda interests, - and to what degree this influence impacted on their diagnostic conclusions and assessments of patient's state of health. Many of the documentary confirmed facts incontestably demonstrate that author's ideological stand (who's opposing to younger generation's transformation into zombie-biorobots with mobile phones on shoulders instead of heads; to electronic totalitarianism with its prison-like total video surveillance; and to the tyrannical political censorship) played nearly a major role in enraging the authorities and triggering the persecutions.


5. I (the reader) am warned that the author sees the main cause of the most dramatic (for him) events in the fact that the enforcement agencies and interested persons and groups managed to present him to the medical community as an individual incapable to evaluate his health condition objectively; as a health-consciousan (or hypochondriac); an extremist; a troublemaker; an individual obsessed with panic and alarm patterns; as a person, who is making unreal demands to the system of medical care - concerning his - allegedly - pseudo-maladies and exaggerated gravity of trivial indispositions. This smear campaign of defamation, scurrilous libel, and wicked calumny made impossible receiving an adequate medical care (and sometimes any medical help at all), and led to health undermining, numerous diseases, incidents, and unnecessary sufferings. Doctors also considered difficult to believe in continuous (not connected with each other) illnesses, with an interval of 4-7 days, sometimes rolling at the same time: as tsunami. They refused to believe in these sequences of illnesses' painful course, danger, and significance. This chronicle disproves such a prejudiced opinion, producing an incontestable evidence.


6. I (the reader) am informed that all negative remarks, characteristics, and facts' assessments belong only to the portrayal of criminal groups, extremists, and carriers of anti-humanistic, racist, and totalitarian ideology, but do not contain groundless generalizations and negative assessment of any country, ethnic group, or religion. The author is categorically against dismantling of any of the existing states, and against restrictions of the rights of religious congregations of any faith.


7. I (the reader) am informed that this edition partially presents the previous 2017 edition without any changes, and, thus, may not correspond to later view and opinions.


8. I (the English reader) am informed that some parts of the following English text of "The Punitive Health Care" - were translated from Polish, Russian, or French originals, and may contain primitive language, double interpretation, or puzzled meaning. Such confusing fragments should be compared with their originals in Polish and Russian languages (author's native languages) [2016-2017]; all controversial points must be resolved through such a comparison.


9. In the very last moment of this edition's make-up (April 2023), the author came across a description of so-called Havana-syndrome, and found same symptoms and complications, which he experienced when was attacked by an unknown remote weapon (3 Nov. 2005, 7 Jan. 2013, and 21 June 2016), and developed symptoms of post-microwave irradiation.


_________


CHAPTER 1.


2014.


JANUARY, 2014.


A new round of politically motivated repressions (as well as the fact of their sudden acceleration since January, 2014) was definitely linked to Ukrainian events, especially as, simultaneously, some actions were taken against publications of my articles and volumous works.


Having no doubts about crimes against humanity (war crimes) of the foreign governments (both East and West), involved in the Ukrainian crises, I, nevertheless, did not take sides, and never publicly expressed any opinion about the local participants in this bloody conflict. Honestly, I have no moral rights to judge about the local sides of this clash, especially when foreign war criminals transform a crisis of linguistic and cultural identity into an uncontrollable ethnic conflict in the middle of Europe.


However, for Canadian war criminals my views and opinions, and my stand concerning Ukrainian tragic events do not matter. Canada, like Stalin's Soviet Union, is world-wide famous for ethnic cleansing and genocidal atrocities of ethnic minorities. Categorizing and profiling people, and using the instrument of collective punishment as a "regulatory" tool - is the fingerprints of Canadian regime. When Stalin or Hitler used repressions against whole nations (like Germans of Volga Region (USSR), or the Nomad-Gipsy (fascists occupation regime) - they did not care about views of individuals, but simply displaced, oppressed, or exterminated whole nations, or whole religious (or social; or class; or other) groups. Canadian regime has acted in the same way, adoring the "collective punishment", and throwing Ukrainians, Japanese, Italians, Spanish, German, and other minorities - into so called "labor camps" (concentration camps) during WWI and WWII, or taking indigenous children away from their families, and putting them into so called "residential schools".


And, still, in last 30 years, the whole world became such an unjust, dangerous, and unlawful place, that even Canada, with her history of war crimes, is safer and better refuge for me than almost all other countries, in most of which my destiny would be even sadder. My records are not about Canada, but about real particular people and their personal actions, because every one is responsible for his-her own actions, not as Canadian, or Chinese, or member of an organization (or community). Bad people base their most criminal judgment on a supposition that this or that "could not" happen in Canada, or in Israel, or in United States, because these are "democratic countries" (an utmost adored argument of the judges during refugee hearings).


Just a lower level of atrocities differs Canada from notoriously famous brutal regimes, but the nature of Canadian crimes is the same. And, when today's Canadian politicians try to ensure that all these crimes are "behind" and "the matter of the past": these are just dishonest rhetoric, because they continue judging people by profiling and categorizing, treating persons like me not by our concrete non-violent, ethically-based humanitarian views, but by blatant prejudges (of the Canadian ideological machine) against all people of some categories, who can have just an opposite (to "suggested" (blatantly attributed to them) view, and who can have just one disagreement with Canadian official ideological table of stereotypes (i.e. instead of attributed to them whole fictive system of alleged views, which every "enemy of the state" "must have"). In other words, not my (or someone's else) personal views and opinions, but the Canadian totalitarian oppressive ideology trigger such a stereotyped categorization.


This is how the "preventive measures" were taken against me, in complete disconnection with my pure humanitarian, apolitical and non-involvement approach, and even with the fact that some of my historical works are most popular in Ukraine, and, especially, in Lvov (Lviv), Ukrainian nationalists" stronghold, and some of my writings (including my work on Mozart) were translated into Ukrainian language.


An incident that left me with fractured toes (an incident, which, probably, was staged); sudden aggravation of police demonstrative surveillance and intimidation; coordinated attacks against all my web emails and my web sites; new series of disconnections of my phone-Internet access; unprecedented level of intimidation, harassment, and abuse in Montreal"s medical institutions; and new deliberate acceleration of my urological drama: were too interconnected and simultaneous for not seeing their artificial and coordinated nature. Just like shortly before the "terrorists" acts of 11 September 2001 (9-11 events in United States), many of non-trivial thinkers were attacked, killed, injured, and persecuted globally, the same campaign of intimidation, attacks, and persecutions was launched in November-December, 2013 - January-February, 2014, prior to military putsch in Kiev, or soon after.


The difference between 2001 and 2014 is such: prior to 11 September 2001, all repressions were generated in July-August 2001 by the "extended" British Empire (with its former colonies), linked to connections to a tiny pseudo-state between Asia and Africa, and its operators-controllers in Canada, London, and Brooklyn; while in 2014 (shortly before the military putsch in Kiev) repressions were generated by both East and West. In July-August 2001, I was nearly killed, when a huge heavy cement bucket fell down from a roof near Sherbrook street; my Canadian web sites were attacked by hackers and administrative repressions, my computer was infected by the most advanced computer viruses, my Internet-telephone line was targeted by innumerous disconnections, and my Canadian email box was closed. However, my Russian connections and my literary, musical, and historical works in Russian Internet were not intact. But in 2014 it was different: the principal Russian search engine Yandex completely blocked my access; 2 of my Russian email boxes were closed; and a campaign of defamation was launched in Russian Internet against me and my creative works.


This shift indicated that all 3 most powerful political camps - the "extended" British Empire (with its European, Australian, and North-American vassals), China, and Russia - since 2014, generated political persecutions not against the carriers of PARTICULAR rival, hostile, violent, or non-ethical ideas, but started to ban and persecute ANY independent opinion, just because of a dictatorial intolerance towards any "non-sanctioned" (not generated by the government) ideas and opinions. As the most sinister regimes in the past, they started to use the retroactive effect, initiating political persecutions against individuals just because those individuals have expressed some views 5, 10, 15, or 20 years ago. As the most sinister regimes in the past, they started to use the medical care for their oppressive, dictatorial methods and goals.


Since February, 2014, all my websites were completely disabled. I was deprived of an access to all my network pages. All my 12 email boxes were closed, with my electronic address on mail.ru inclusively.


The access to LiveJournal, Twitter, Schoolmates (Odnoklassniki), Facebook, YouTube, Instagram, etc. - banned.


When I did an attempt to enter Network from an Internet-cafe, police used to come and expel me from there, without explaining the reasons.


In some days or even weeks, search engines, such as Yandex, Google, or Yahoo: were closed for me.


And all this happened despite the fact that my creativity and my views had no relation to Ukrainian events: I did not make any statements and did not write even a single article concerning the Ukrainian crises. I am well familiar with Ukrainian literature; I translated verses and prose of Ukrainian authors from Ukrainian into English, Polish and Russian. In turn, my works (for example, "Mozart's life and her secrets", "Pandora's box", etc.) are translated by enthusiasts into Ukrainian; they enjoy the greatest popularity among the Ukrainian-speaking readers in Lvov.


It is difficult to imagine that any given political forces in Russia or in Ukraine could organize such wave of oppressions, provocations, sabotage, diversions, or terrorist attacks against me in connection with the Ukrainian conflict.


No, only foreign adventurers were behind these attacks (not speaking about the Canadian regime). Definitely, some foreign interested parties outside Ukraine and outside of the Canadian Ukrainian communities and organizations (i.e. NOT Ukrainian nationalists) tried to disable each activist, who would (with highest probability) take "no side" in the Ukrainian conflict. We should have no doubts that - behind all these fascist-style actions - there were political forces of those states that most loudly cry out about "human rights", at the same time hypocritically violating all human and ethical norms in ideological and political, and practical activities. Such extreme cynicism in charge of others whereas they consciously provoke humanitarian disasters, largest in post-war history, worldwide, is characteristic of those several states, which have sufficient power to arrange diversions against dissidents globally.


Even if not to consider diversion for the purpose of causing injuries, only the razor-sharp enforcement of police, administrative, medical, and other repressions and persecutions alone led (for me) to a very stressful situation, more undermining my immunity to a number of diseases and bringing down on me a whole falls of misfortunes.


Persecutions, and, especially, stoppings (interceptions) by police, to which I was subjected and which increased to the maximum in 2013 - beginning of 2015, hardly affected also the members of my family, who are worried about me, striking a blow to their health, too.


And the fact that, since 2015, the persecution by police and the level of demonstrative surveillance quickly began to decline (temporary), and medical crimes against me also began to lose their systematic character and range, pushes on an assumption that a very important role in these crimes was played the Harper's regime, and, it is not excluded, even personally the prime minister Stephen Harper. Another suggestion comes to mind: that this brake in systemic police intimidation has happened thanks to the governmental rotation, when Mr. Trudeau government was just replacing Harper's and its further sinister character was not yet set, because later police surveillance was reestablished again.


It is only enough to study surfacely my refugee file of 1994-1998 - and to compare its content with the fact that Harper actually awarded a semi-secret non-state extremist organization the status of an enforcement agency, introduced it into the Canadian parliament and participated personally in its activities and meetings (only this already illustrates the end of Canadian democracy): for understanding what motive could be hiding behind the transition of persecutions into an absolutely different level by coming of Harper's regime into power.


Now, I will list the basic facts of walking "on doctors" at the beginning of 2014.


From December, 2013, to January 6, 2014 (it was mentioned in the previous book of this series): dermatological problems; new lesions; lesion under the left eye. Because doctors left me no even a slightest solution, they forced me to remove it myself in a surgical way, by means of glass and wooden needles-sticks (Chinese-Tibetan "scalpels").


Since the end of December to January 3, 2014: furuncles on the finger and on the wrist.


I managed to cure them successfully by means of a mixture from natural products, with adding of the squeezed-out garlic, bay leaf, lemon drops, etc.


Since the end of December till January 15, 2014: my younger daughter had an abscess on hand's interior (below the elbow and higher than the wrist) several weeks - a serious furuncle and abscess, which had to be opened in hospital (a surgical operation), then to be treated by antibiotics.


Though my oldest daughter, as a rule, does not suffer from a flu, she had virus 3 weeks; + epic of arthritis, cough, and other catarrhal (influenzal) phenomena. My younger daughter and my wife also had flu with bronchitis complication.


A heavy flu overtook even I. and M. (the second: normally "does not" become sick; he"s an athlete, a former champion in speed skating).


Only I alone did not catch a flu (communicating with all sick people) - that once again proves: it is not so single-digitly with my immune system (in general - the immunity works, and in other cases: problems and problems) - (and - with respect thereto - the same "old" questions of the reasons of the infinite and uncountable - and not connected with each other - infections). (See previous sections of this series).


The "wave" of infectious and inflammatory diseases, which covered all our family members, raises even more questions.


The skin infection visually similar to sarcoma Kaposi and described in the previous section of this series - began to heal only after January 6, 2014, thanks to my own natural remedies.


Small "beads" on the forehead, which normally form because of the fat selections in the deep layers of mycoses and which are considered incurable and "non-preventable": began to heal due to my own "home" remedies.


Continuous "bombardment" by abscesses, skin and mucous infections, inflammations, dermatological problems and new growths, furuncles, abscesses and folliculitis (which started to torment me at once right after the "strange" vertigo on January 7, 2013, and lasted up to February, 2014), almost irrefutably demonstrates an external influence, which entailed both vertigo, and all these complications.


Such an influence could be either a serious poisoning, or an exposure to radiation with microwaves (maybe, even life-threatening) of unhealthy intensity and frequency.


Finger and wrist furuncles appeared and harden my life along simultaneously with the lesion under the left eye.


(January 13, 2014).

The finger furuncle, which was not brought to an "extreme" purulent stage only thanks to intensive treatment by my own methods.


Complications of the finger furuncle: January 16, 2014. Certainly, nothing serious. Furuncles of the "bitten-off sliver" (and due to other reasons) happen practically at everyone from time to time, and this is not a "doomsday". Especially that (as I noted above) I managed to win rather quickly against this infection and to cure it BEFORE the finger swelled more and filled with pus (that repeatedly happened). But this fact is given for other reasons here: to show that - since 2001 - there was left NO DAY in my live without problems connected to health, and, in addition, all health problems have accelerated IMMEDIATELY after the vertigo on January 7, 2013, with a pattern of the avalanche of the invasion of infections, inflammations, dermatological problems, etc.


And the fact that exactly in a year all these phenomena (which I consider complications from something very serious, only visible manifestation of what was vertigo on January 7, 2013) temporarily came to naught: additionally, specifying on probable microwave radiation of the dangerous frequency.


The period of "epidemic" (complications, consequences) with very contoured time boundaries, which was replaced by the period, during which infections, dermatological problems, inflammations, etc. - almost did not disturb: represents a very clear picture described in the academic books and textbooks about the effects of the chemical warfare agents and microwave radiation of unhealthy intensity and frequency. From here - the unambiguous remission, which is obviously inscribed in the period of effects of similar complications of radiation.


On January 10, 2014, at 10:20, I was on reception at Dr. Marie St.-Jacques (dermatologist). I tried to speak with her about the systemic failure, which became the reason of numerous dermatological pathologies.


Approximately, by the end of January 2014 - all medical problems (health problems) practically "evaporated". Bones and joints' pain disappeared; potentially dangerous new skin lesions "disappeared" or descended; internal condylomas, etc. disappeared. (Practically everything that was described in the previous parts: "passed away").


FEBRUARY, 2014.


For 1 incomplete month (February, 2014) I was completely free from illnesses, having become an "absolutely healthy" person. Even what I, by means of the atlas of skin diseases, identified as a seborrheal keratosis (this diagnosis was also confirmed by Dr. Marie St.-Jacques) - "disappeared" though neither treatment, nor prevention. There was, however, one exception: an allergy or inflammation of face skin on February 6, 2014 (with swelling of the affected area (see below):


Despite temporal complete "remission", I continued to visit doctors with routine (planned long before) visits, only to learn that all exams, all analyses bring normal results.


But - not for long music played...


Everything bad has restarted with a confusion of strange phone calls from medical institutions. An ultrasound appointment was booked for February 17, 2014 (at 13:00): kidneys and bladder urinary ultrasonography. Because of its potential uselessness (complete remission after the course of antibiotics, followed by the "disappearance" of all symptoms) I called (on February 11, 2014) and cancelled it. (I also cancelled it because, being an idealist and altruist, I did not want to "misuse" public medical resources for not urgent medical exams).


However, in the second half of February 2014, the radiological department of the same hospital contacted me, and, having left a message on the answering machine, informed that this exam was postponed for March 11, 2014.


When, on March 6, 2014, I called there, it was a respond that the procedure was cancelled on February 11, 2014, and was not reassigned any more.


On February 26, 2014, I received one more call: a secretary or a nurse of a doctor, whose name I never heard, and whom I never contacted, mentioned his name, and reported that - for March 25, 2014 - I am registered for an appointment with him. It is possible that it was one of the specialists-doctors, visit to whom was arranged by one of my permanent doctors, but I did not react in time, and did not ask the secretary to clarify this appointment or to call me back, and the phone number was - as usually - behind the governmental and corporative phone numbers (since approximately 2008) - "anonymous". She disconnected before I could ask questions, and, unlike other calls from the medical institutions, no doctor"s specialty, no hospital"s name, no address was mentioned.


On February 26, 2014, when I addressed not to Dr. Marie St.-Jacques, but to Dr. Beatrice Wang (a dermatologist, whom I know for nearly 13 years), it was clarified that the date of my visit in the computer log of the secretariat differs from the assigned day, and that, moreover, I am registered for a visit to... to another doctor.


For a long period of time, I could not book an appointment with doctor Wang, because, after dialing Dr. Wang"s clinic's phone number, I heard an automatic machine's voice, which responded that such phone number does not exist. During approximately 2 and half years, I called, probably, 5 or 6 times from home, and an automatic voice steadily informed that there is no such phone number. Through some time, a suspicion crept in my mind that my phone was simply disconnected from Dr. Beatrice Wang"s clinic, and then I easily reached her clinic from a pay-on-answer coin station.


Now, having come to her clinic, I took an interest at secretaries whether the phone number of the clinic have been changed and whether it used to change temporarily within the last year - year and a half, and received a negative response.


It became clear that it was a next intrigue of BELL Telephone Company.


During the exam, it was clarified that the "marks" of the seborrheal keratosis (let now almost imperceptible) have appeared on the spin area again.


On my way to the dermatologist and on my way back home, I was accompanied by police cars and other cars with already familiar numbers.


For example, near the Metro, taxi car (09:07) "cut" me, and, when I already literally entered the Metro: the police car 21-15 passed by very slowly (09:08).


On my way back (I walked home) the police car 15-12 stopped at the intersection, in the place of intersection or approaching of 5 streets and the walking path across the canal Lachine (i.e. "in the most important" key point). The policemen watched from their car how I am crossing the canal and into which of 5 streets I will go (10:15).


The same police car "cut" me in the same place on February 23, 2014, when I returned from my friends-doctors, and when I was also crossing the canal via the same bridge (14:26).


The police car 15-3 (10:27) defiantly slowly passed by for a half-block from my home.


And - since February 28, 2014 - there was a new return of a situation, after which a new series of tragic events followed.


For February 28, 2014, we were ordered to appear in one public institution, due to an alleged "investigation" of the sources of our income, and an "inquiry" how we can subsist.


Let's not to mention about the absurdity of this "investigation" and "inquiry".


There I stayed 28 minutes, and my wife and my daughter: 45 minutes.


Having come back home, I found traces of strangers" stay in the apartment.


When I turned on 3 of my computers, none of them worked (before leaving, I turned them off, and disconnected from the sockets).


The system recovery in each computer, search for viruses, reconfiguration, and BIOS resetting took away from me entire 2 days. Besides, it appeared that the bedroom door - as "on a wave of a magic wand" - ceased to creak.


Here some explanations are necessary.


The administration of this houses" network does not allow installing latches on the front and rear entrances' doors. To hear "uninvited guests" (in extreme cases), I tried that the door creaked, and that this scratch could be heard in "a block away".


As soon as, having returned, I touched the door, a zipper rushed in my head: "What the hell is going on!" But there was more to come. Right there it was clear that the bedroom door is not latched now in (not closing at all) in general. The uvula of the mechanism of the door handle ceased to enter the emptiness of the chase bore of a lintel. How they could be in time for all of this for half an hour: it is hard to say, but the real facts - a stubborn and unpleasant thing.


I "lost" 54 disks from my unique collection of pre-revolution Russian movies (1890-s-1910-s), and it is not a needle and not a grain that "to be gone under a bed".


One week prior to the putsch (coup d"état) in Kiev, all my electronic (email) boxes, Skype, and all other means of communications - ceased to work as one.


There were other Russian-speaking dissidents in Canada, too, to whom someone "obstructed the oxygen" one-week prior this event. It is possible to assume that someone has a list of those whose public or journalistic activity could be viewed as "wrong" ("not approved"). It is one more indirect indication that the putsch was staged and initiated by foreign intelligence agencies.


MARCH, 2014.


[This part of the chronicle is given without any changes, according to the original manuscript (only such fragments as few letters to friends were removed from the original text). This whole chronicle is based on the series of articles, published on several web sites in 2006-2015 [2016] and entitled "The License to Kill". Further, the fragments of the original chronicle (the beginning of 2014) - with the additions - were inserted into the articles of this series. Here they are given in the original form, without notes and supplements. Therefore, all events of this fragment are described in the present. This translation from Russian original was done by 2 amateur translators, and was not verified or edited by the author; so, there are could be present mistakes and errors of different sorts.]


March 3, 2014.


Due to provocation on March 3, 2014, when an ex-terminator came to do prevention "against bugs", I got a fracture of 2 toes, which was a direct consequence of this man"s culpability.


I gave the full description of what happened in my series "The License to Kill".


Keeping ice on the fractured toes, I inevitably (having no choices) provoked another recurrence of acute UTI.


I was imprisoned inside my apartment for 2 months, being not able to go outside. I received no help from social workers, local CLSC, or from doctors. Even the pain killers were not prescribed on my request (while buying them was also a burden in our tragic socio-economic situation).


I described the outraged treatment in St.-Mary"s ER (due to the fracture) in other books of this chronicle under the common title "The Mistreatment of My Injuries". The doctor in ER even "did not see" the fracture of the second toe, denied me an appointment with a surgeon, and kicked me out from ER without any medical help, any prescription, any follow ups, administration of crutches, any medications, physiotherapy, referral to CLSC, etc.


So the fracture looked on March 4-5, 2014. Deformation is obvious and the suspicion on a complicated fracture is obvious. With this complicated and EXTREMELY painful fracture, I was left without any medical help and medical advices-consultations.


It is unlikely that - looking at these photos - doctors will have at least a drop of doubt that the doctor in ER was obliged - at least - to show me to a surgeon, and to issue the follow-ups.


However, I received different "follow-ups": on my way to hospital and from the hospital I was followed by police cars, like 29-6, and others.


If I did not use "home remedies" and comprehensive healing methods, using super-efforts to heal the injury myself, the fracture would never heal, and I would never be able to walk normally again.


During 4 months, I was not able to walk: at first, could not walk at all, then could not walk as before the fracture, and limped on the injured foot, while being denied any rehabilitation therapy. I was forced by inhuman doctors (who refused me a referral to the physiotherapy (doctor in ER, and doctors, whom I visited when I, finally, became able to walk-limping) to study medical literature and to do the physiotherapy myself, according to hardly obtained instructions. Otherwise, I would become a handicap person for the rest of my life.


They all even refused me the crutches: the hospital (St. Mary"s), the social worker (whom I contacted), and doctors, whom I visited. I don"t blame my local CLSC, because they needed a medical referral-prescription, and the hospital's doctors refused it. And I could not go to CLCS myself, because I was not able to walk. My wife investigated the prices for lending or buying the crutches, but the cost made her just outraged.


When, in the end of March, 2014, the fracture was still awful and did not heal, and, to the opposite, there was a rapid worsening, on March 26, 2014, I sent a fax to St. Mary's Hospital"s ER with the following content:


From Lev Gunin,

holder of Medical Insurance Card [................................]

and St. - Mary"s Hospital Card [...]

residing at

...... (tel. 514-...................)


TO EMERGENCY ROOM OF ST. MARY"S HOSPITAL


I am asking the Emergency Room for an appointment with bone specialist as soon as possible.

I consider it a grave mistake sending me home (March 04, 2014) from St. - Mary Hospital"s

Emergency Room, without

1) traumatic-orthopedic surgeon"s evaluation of the broken middle toe;

2) any document (medical summary), diagnosis, and

3) follow ups.


After 3 weeks, I"m always in pain; toe shows no big improvement (still swollen, stiff, black,

and deformed). It is possible that not just a tip top of the distal phalanx was affected, but neighbor bone and finger, and (or) nail bed, and (or) joint-cartilage, and softer tissue as well.


Because walking again to Emergency Room poses hardship, and there is no assurance that I"ll not be sent home without help again, I"ll not show up until granted surgeon"s examination.


It is possible that the traumatic damage may heal just fine, leaving no serious complications and/or limping.


However, right now it looks and feels not OK, and I am righteously worried, having rights to receive non-delayed and adequate answers, recommendations, and follow ups.


Yours truly,

Lev Gunin

P.S. For saving medical specialists" time

and for pre-evaluation, I attach

clear and high resolution photos of

damaged toe (taken on different

stages of trauma evolution).


From 26 to 28 of March, I called the ER and spoke to the staff, but both my fax and my verbal requests for help were just cynically ignored.


Sudden worsening in the end of March, 2014.


There were many very strange and suspicious circumstances surrounded this incident.


Another interesting fact, another "coincidence": my older daughter had a toe fracture 7 months later (on Tuesday, November 11, 2014), also at her home, under very similar circumstances.


CHAPTER 2.


APRIL-MAY, 2014.


On April 3-4, 2014 - reddening and swelling of skin of both hands. Fingers became as sausages; the baking plate was formed by a thumb of the left hand the whole red hillock. Both palms insufferably burned and "itched".


Allergy, left hand on April 3, 2014, and on 12 April, 2014. Allergy, red spots are well visible. This photo also reflects sharp degradation of the venous-capillary network, which was reversible later, and at the beginning of 2015 the situation became normal.


Approximately, on April 14, 2014, when I still stayed permanently at home with the complicated right leg"s toes fracture (without knowing whether I will be able move-walk normally sometime), my wife went to pharmacy to pick up (for me) the blood pressure controlling pills. There she was told that such tablets "came to an end" there, and asked to come in the evening, after 18:00.


It seemed strange, especially as the delivery to this pharmacy network normally takes place most lately up to 15.30.


It was also suspicious because my medication (one of the most widespread of this category) ever lacked in such huge drugstores, and something similar never happened before.


My wife told me nothing, but a young employee "at the beck and call" contacted us - and came across me. She reported that my medication "is ready", and I can "pick it up".


Since it seemed suspicious, I asked my wife not to go for this medication on the same day, but to delay it till the next day. However, it turned out that she was not able to obtain the pills tomorrow's morning, and (despite of my request to postpone it until tomorrow's evening) she went to the drugstore on the same day.


I instantly forgot about this incident, and began to take the pill as always. Daily headaches and jumping up-down blood pressure began in the 2-nd half of April. Somewhere on May 2-nd, 2014, when I began to complain about this condition, my wife sarcastically assumed that I will - for certain - blame it on the fact that - in April - I was not given out the tablets as usually.


Then I recalled the whole event, and - on the same day - ceased to take the pills, and - on May 7, 2014 - we took a new batch in the pharmacy.


Headaches at once stopped. Blood pressure and pulse instantly normalized: 120 x 80, pulse 60, as usual.


It is interesting that - in this pharmacy - they never handed out any following monthly dose even a day earlier without altercations, and here they gave it implicitly in a week ahead, without telling anything...


Having spent permanently at home nearly 2 months with the finger fracture, by April 25 I already began to get out carefully-slowly on the street though moved with huge work. Not only that - when walking - intolerable pains began; after the fracture, the finger "did not fit" in any footwear, and I walked as on the prosthesis.


Nevertheless, dozens of procedures (and usage of alternative medicine, which I used for returning the former shape and flexibility to the finger and to heal the injury) already - by the end of April - began to yield results.


I tried to develop the finger to return the plasticity to it by means of recommended (by medical literature) exercises - in water and without; used a "miracle cream"; received calcium with minerals.


I made - at first of a pressboard, then of plastic - a special muff, which dressed on the damaged finger, walking up and down with it in my apartment for hours, and dressed another muff for the night.


Since May 2, 2014, I began to ride my bike again.


On April 28, 2014, our good acquaintance and piano class teacher of local conservatory (musical faculty of McGill University) suddenly contacted me. (She and her husband [who once won the international contest of Michelangeli], taught my daughter before her arrival in the musical college and university).


She told me about an opportunity to present one of my musical compositions for the judgment of the audience, and that it is necessary (for this purpose) to do an arrangement (of one of its parts) for symphonic orchestra, and then it will be played by her pupil with orchestra.


The arrangement was absolutely small, besides - very simple and easy, but I needed to remake it repeatedly because of misunderstanding, and then in connection with new requirements, which arose in the course of the rehearsals.


I tried as good as I could though my work was extremely complicated by innumerous failures of my low-power computers, which "pulled" the musical software with a big strain, failures of the program itself, my phenomenal absent-mindedness, and the whole swarm of other problems.


It was necessary to bring repeatedly the musical score with corrections - all new and new versions, and, several times, I carried them by bicycle.


As soon as I used to come to the initiator of this arrangement, a car of the private security agency Garda, or a police car appeared right after my arrival opposite to windows (of her very huge apartment).


For example, on May 4, 2014, the police car 72-86 approached in a couple of minutes after I brought the music (approximately at 18:05), and remained opposite to the windows approximately till 18:23 (I had to wait while this music teacher was occupied with her pupils).


As soon as I quitted through the entrance, the police immediately dashed away.


The same police car spied on me on September 21, 2010 (00.05), on May 22, 2011 (16.00), on October 4, 2012 (14.08), and on January 22, 2013 (12.29).


My bicycle trips (when I was working on the arrangement) were also monitored by private police or intelligence agencies cars with letters FGX or RX in their license plates number tables.


It is important to mark that - while I (without budging from place) stayed at home and healed the fracture, all 2 months no other diseases disturbed me (except strange headaches described above). For 2-3 days, I had a small cold, which is not surprising: I was putting the ice all the time, and walked barefoot on the icy floor.


On May 15, 2014, I called Yu., whom I "did not disturb" many months.


Almost each walk with him has turned for me into dizziness or some other strange disturbing symptoms, and, when the walks with him became rare, after them - even stranger and dangerous conditions and symptoms began to arise.


When we met nearly every day, it was difficult to connect these conditions to him, but, less often we met, more the dependence between joint pastime and these conditions was shown clearly.


Several examples explicitly are described in my series of articles "The License to Kill".


For a reason, which I am omitting here, there arose a need to contact him.


When - on May 15, 2014 - I spoke with him by phone, he at once expressed a desire to meet, but it did not enter my intentions. I was afraid that, after a walk with him, something happens once again, and decided to restrict communication with him to conversations by phone. He knew - why I avoid meeting him face to face. Nevertheless, from the first telephone remarks, he began to insist busily on joint walk. Somehow he managed to finish me, but - when he had to phone about time and place, he, for some reason, did not declared, and I did not call him back, too, reasonably avoiding meeting him face to face.


However, I return now to the description of my call to Yu. on May 15, 2014.


I woke him up by my call, and he first answered half asleep, and, in 10 years having well studied his intonations, psychology, habits, I was absolutely sure that he does not just pretend to be sleepy. (I suggested calling back later, but he insisted on talk continuation).


In response to my report about toe"s fracture, he said that he already knows about it. He stated it half asleep, on the automatic mode, so, it could not be deception or empty scoffing. I asked - from where. He told that - from me. I answered that - since March 3, 2014, when I got this fracture - we did not communicate.


Then he told that (in that case) he learned about it from someone else. This put that Oleg (the musician (with whom I recorded my latest English songs album) was an only person in Montreal whom I told about the fracture around 2 weeks ago. Except of the members of my family (my wife, daughters, I. and M.), nobody else, except Oleg, was aware about my next tragic incident.


So, I asked Yu. - from whom else he could learn about my fracture. He told that, probably, I told Oleg, and Oleg - told him.


Everything looked very logically and credibly. It would seem that all questions disappeared by themselves. Still, I phoned Oleg, and, during our conversation, it became clear that he communicated with Yu. more than 2 months ago. Actually, I asked Oleg if he saw Yu. or spoke to him in last 2 months. So, Oleg was confident that - regarding last 2 months -

he certainly did not see Yu. and did not exchange phone calls with him, and added that he knows about it absolutely precisely, because last time they communicated in February, concerning a significant event, and - since then - never exchanged calls and did not meet.


So, if Yu. told the truth (and this seems undisputable), and he already knew about the finger fracture from somewhere, then it pushes on interesting speculations.


In connection with these "interesting speculations", I intentionally told him by phone that those, who set up the finger fracture, would pay dearly for it.


Approximately, on May 17, 2014, we phoned each other again.


As I already mentioned above, nothing hurt at that moment, no problems with health disturbed me, headaches stopped as soon as - on May 7 - I received another batch of tablets.


I did not want at all that - again - something would have ached, and that - after a next walk with Yu. - I had to see doctors. Therefore, I refused in every possible way and tried to evade from a meeting (with him). And, yet, he managed to persuade me on joint walk in the area, which is not really far away from mine. He, after all, is rather a famous and skilled theatrical and film director (even if former director), and was trained professionally of the technique of psychological influence, arrangements, suggestions, manipulations of people.


I will add another important fact.


After a break in several months (apart from nearly 2 months, during which I permanently stayed at home because of the toe fracture), the former level of police surveillance and escorts was resumed.


It occurred on May 1-st, 2014 (and on May 9, 2014: a sharp intensifying of police intimidation), which also cannot be accidental (May 1-st: The International Workers Day; May 9-th: The Holiday of the Victory Day (victory over fascism) in Russia). The Nazis intentionally showed that they are setting the police on me. What fascists they are by their origin and their pseudo-ethnic identifications - it is not so important. If yesterday the separated Nazis were at enmity with each other, today they integrate, and act together. [As for symbolic - everything is much more difficult, and May 1: not only the "workers' day ", but also something else, but the probable symbolic incorporates all these values.]


When, in the evening of May 18, 2014, at 21:45, Yu. called me, and my wife gave me a lift (driving our car) to the rendezvous point, then I already was densely surrounded by police cars, which jumped out literally one by one.


During our walk with Yu., the patrol cars jumped off literally from each angle as mad, and it is hardly possible to call a coincidence.


Yu.'s son, Dmitry, was recently appointed the director of the information department of the main television channel of one puppet regime, and it is already a potential connection between Yu. - and the hidden "politicization" of his attitude to events, which surround me, and to many other things.


Dmitry is also the director of one of media holdings and also a political strategist (in whose "honesty" huge amounts of money are invested). He is the most "gray horse" among the national politicians of his country. Playing a role of the "most decent" guy, he in practice actually "threw" (betrayed) A.G., who, really, was the most decent country"s politician (if this characteristic is applicable to politicians). He resorted to Nechaev"s terrorist methods, having invented a party, which does not exist, and provided a stand to local social nationalists in the newspaper issued by him. His balancing between extreme racism (Nazism) and moderate anti-fascism is too masterly to believe in his naturalness and "independence".


Not accidentally his "sponsors" and masters - removed the whole archive of his newspapers from Internet; removed all information about him (in addition to EXTREMELY avaricious semi-official), all potential compromising evidence, all his bonds with Israel and Zionism, all huge library of his own journalistic materials, speeches, articles, and interviews, except for only several of his own articles.


It means, firstly, it was a reason - why to remove them, and, secondly, such operations are available only for large international intelligence agencies...


While we walked, Yu. unexpectedly started conversation about how the intelligence agencies hire people, and that this terrible and bloody servitude stays already for the rest of the agents' life. He cited as examples novels by English writer Kennan (whose books I never read), and told that - for him - Kennan described this especially brightly. He added that the intelligence agencies shall tie a person by blood, and, as a rule, it is not an imitation of an attempt, not beating, not a car incident to mutilate a victim, but a real murder.


And then, he repeated, it is already forever, for the rest of one"s life. And - in novels by Kennan (if I correctly remembered this author"s name), told Yu., as well as in real life: everything must come to a very bad end.


When I accompanied him to the Metro, he, despite the late hour and risk to be late for the transfer line, stopped to smoke, and detained me, by now ready to come back home.


I all tried to leave, by an intuitive enlightenment suspecting some dirty trick of this performance, or seeing a theoretical possibility of some dirty trick in this situation.


In my friend"s intonations and gestures was something artificial, some affection, and I resolved to leave abruptly.


At that moment, understanding - that he would not be able to hold me anymore - my friend quickly got his IPhone of one of the latest models from his inside pocket, and brought it to my face. I instinctively started back, and to mask - whether a fright, whether an inadequate reaction - and told that I do not want him to photograph me.


His response was inadequate for this person, because he told that, really, it is a camera phone, in which there are 2 lenses, both behind and in front, and that it is a very "dangerous" - "the same as Samsung" - device.


Then I understood that he got the camera not for the purpose of photographing me secretly (that he loves very much to do). Then for what purpose? This whole scene with the tobacco and conversation at the Metro was obviously arranged for some special intention. With this riddle in my head, I left.


At home, suddenly the bone of the left foot terribly ached, in that place where the external horizontal bone is departing from the smaller finger, overlapping the other, "vertical" bone. Pain was such as if I had a fracture. Still, on my way home, I marked reddish flashouts in the right eye and so-called "floating objects".


When I turned on the computer, and began to look at the screen, there was the whole network of "motes" in the right corner of the right eye, and each turn of the head was accompanied by red flashout on the eye circuit.


There were left no doubts that there was the vitreous body detachment: in incomplete 7 months after the same happened to the left eye.


In the following days, the situation with the right eye worsened whereas the pain completely disappeared in the left foot.


If the vitreous body detachment has developed in the left eye during about 5 days, and then the sight stabilized, and no new "veils" and "floating objects" appeared any more, it was different with the right eye. First, deterioration lasted 9-14 days, and, secondly, was followed by the additional phenomena and symptoms. I will describe all symptoms in stages.


1. Floating objects: "palls", "front sights", "motes", "veils", "network".

2. Flashouts while turning the head quickly left-right.

3. Sharp pain spasm for 1-2 seconds in the right temple: as though suddenly there was a painful strip.

4. If I closed the right eye, largest dark "motes" did not disappear (it was not so with the left eye).

5. When I closed the right eye, I saw light zigzag lines - "zippers" - in the Right Sector, which remained for long time. They depart from a certain point in a crown of the Right Sector, forming a slanted pyramid.

6. (after being stopped by police) A dark object like a bent nail or "worm", which changed the form in case of turn of the eyeglobe. If I looked to the right, this object was "bent" to the right, but once I turned the look on the left - it "became straight" and "thickened", taking already another form.

7. Black "hollows" of triangular shape turned down as "notches" or hollows on an old mirror. The first appeared after being stopped and interrogated by police on May 22 next morning, and in the subsequent days their number increased. Because of all these objects in the right eye, it became difficult to focus my look - as happens when it is impossible to guide "sharpness" of the camera at external objects through the glass covered with water droplets.

8. When the right eye looked to a limit to the left, a peckled "reticulum" was gradually formed on the extreme right periphery between its junctions.

9. If - after left eye's vitreous detachment - all these "veils", "mouches", or "motes" became visible only when I look against light, or at a light surface, then - in the right eye - several "hollows", "points", and, the main thing, an opaque black object in the form of the bent tack: are visible even in poorly illuminated location.


In the books of this series "Who Destroyed My Vision and Hearing" I describe how this (right"s eye) vitreous detachment developed into more serious problems than the problem with the left eye; how the next stopping by police could aggravate the situation with the R. Eye; and how the ophthalmological care was again recklessly denied for me (May 27, 2014, Clinique Ophthalmo Ouest), and the follow-ups were sabotaged.


Parallel to the abscess on a cyst, which, in turn, has formed on an old scar, the general process of skin degradation was developing, connected, apparently, to the sabotage of urological and hepatica problems medical treatment, which triggered the misbalance between mensual bacteria and allergens, development of oppositional infections and another denial of antibiotic therapy by doctors, when a new (next) urological infection accrued.


Concerning the refusal of antibiotics, it must be added (for the following years) that not only blunt-bold refusals, but also cunning prescriptions of non-correct antibiotics, or prescriptions of not the right dose of Cipro and not on right terms' length (for 3, 5 or 7 days only, for fighting an acute and long-lasted infection) contributed to 14-years-long (already in 2014) UT infection, while bringing only short periods of relief and poisoning (in vain!) liver and other organs, and generating potential cellular (genetic) damage and aging acceleration.


In the photo taken on June 7, 2014, it is possible to note a set of recently formed skin "marks" on hands, shoulders, etc., which were not present up to May-June, 2014.


The same problems on a back and shoulders. June 6, 2014.


CHAPTER 3.


JUNE 2014.


On June 4, 2014, I came to my family doctor not only to investigate about the result of blood-urine tests and the toes" X-ray (there appeared to be a second fracture), but also concerning another inflammation of the continuous infiltration on my back, around 6-th and 7-th vertebra.


There was whether a fatty tumor, or combined with a cyst (my main family doctor thinks that it is only a cyst).


This cyst on my back was formed (as almost all the others cysts and fatty lesions) on an old scar.


I have got this wound under strange, unusual circumstances.


It happened in the first months of the newly constructed Metro (underground subway), functioning in the city of Minsk. (I worked there 2 times a week and studied composition in the Musical Conservatory (High School of Music of the University level) and choral conducting at the Minsk Institute of Culture).


Two unfamiliar guys have stubbed me with something sharp in the back - and have instantly escaped, running.


It happened when I went towards the ladders of the underground platform.


The wound did not heal and then suppurated for a long period of time. The strangeness of that case is not only that (for what reason someone had to stab an extraneous person in the back; or why the hooligans have chosen me as the victim?), in the situation of the tightened security in Minsk's Metro at this time, and the permanent presence of militia (police), no criminal would risk to undertake such an insolent and glaringly outraged action, but also that 2 guys who stabbed me, did not look like criminals or young members of a street gang, but as civilized, cultured, and well-to-do medical students from good families. They were not teenagers, but young men of 23-24 y.o.


If they wanted to wound me seriously, or kill: the consequences would be much more serious. From all the conceivable tools (a pricker, a knife, a probe, etc.) a thin scalpel corresponded most of all to the look and the character of the wound.


But everyone knows, how sharp the medical scalpel is, and with what ease it cuts the soft tissue. To hit someone on the run with a scalpel, having thus left rather a small cut and having got precisely to a backbone (and I suspect that it was an intended task of the executors): it is necessary to do it extremely skillfully and with good knowledge of anatomy.


The whole set of such circumstances says that behind that case there were very serious organizers, such, as, let us assume, some people from KGB.


Due to the cyst formed years ago on a back: it was my wife, not me, who first recalled this old incident, and only by then it came to my memory, and then I opened my old diaries of the Soviet era, and found the description with some of its particular details.


[In Montreal, 2 very young female surgeons, who opened the abscess, have confirmed that there is definitely was a deep scar, where the cyst formed.]


I demanded from my attending physician:


а) referral to a surgeon for cyst"s removal;


b) antibiotics for the prevention of abscess development;


c) prescription of antibiotic cream, which already repeatedly helped me in the similar cases;


d) confirmation of my self-diagnosis "abscess".


It is bizarre that I was refused all 4 demands - all these 4 points.


The "appointment card" ("coupon") for this rendezvous with my family doctor for June 4, 2014 (see above).


Polysporin bought right after the visit to my family doctor on June 4, 2014. It has not helped AT ALL... The doctor should prescribe at least any remedy, instead of throwing the treatment completely on patient"s shoulders. If sick people have to struggle with an illness: then what the doctors for?


Only much later (after few years) I discovered that it was Dr. Brian Morris, who blocked the prescription of antibiotics, and restricted most of the medical services for me. With his enormous influence, his wide connection in the medical circles and in Montreal's and provincial medical administration, and his close cooperation with the government and its enforcement agencies, he had such a power. His explanation to the government was that I, allegedly, "misused" the "free" "universal" medical care, provoking excessive spending.


The laboratory test of the abscess"s infiltrate should become a paramount measure (in my opinion) - to know, which medication can help (i.e. to affect the bacterium which has caused the abscess).


If - at the initial stage - it was known that the infection source - is the pepto-streptococci, - it was possible to choose an effective remedy, and not to provoke a surgical intervention.


In previous years, I asked the same doctor 3 times (and repeatedly 7 other doctors) to refer me to a surgeon for this cyst's removal, and each time was refused.


He has declared that in the "normal" condition this cyst is too "tiny", and "nobody" "will remove" it.


Besides, he said, there is no guarantee that - after the removal - the cyst does not re-emerge, and that the surgery will not be in vain. This - the last - argument sounded quite reasonably, however, several already occurred episodes of this cyst's inflammation (with an infiltrate accumulation and the danger of a serious abscess) justified an attempt of its surgical removal.


I did many attempts to receive a referral to a surgeon from dermatologists, and from several doctors in walk-in clinics, and was refused, too.


Once again - a reddening (probably, an inflammation) of this cyst-on-an-old-scar (on the back) has begun approximately since May 24, 2914.


By June 4-th it was already transformed into an abscess, as well as in 3 last times.


On June 4, 2014, I have asked my family doctor to prescribe (concerning the cyst"s inflammation) an antibiotic ointment Fucidin, and even this request was denied.


I have asked him to refer me to a surgeon: again a refusal. I have demanded antibiotics: again a refusal.


The family doctor has advised to put warm compresses (which I was already applying), but I knew - on previous inflammations - that it does not help. In the past, I used the antibiotic cream Fucidin, which made the difference by then on the early stages, and the abscess have dissolved. Unfortunately, I did not have this cream any more, and doctors have denied me a new prescription. If they thought that a long usage of Fucidin can provoke a growth of resistant bacteria, then they could prescribe another antibiotic cream, but they did not do it.


Instead of "real" strong antibiotic ointment - my family doctor has advised me to put Polysporin: if the inflammation - passing to a furuncle or an abscess, then - will open itself.


It was, of course, not that attitude, of which I was counting.


I have asked about a requisition for an ultrasound examination - and was also refused.


The family doctor has told me that the cyst is "too small", and "they will see nothing". I tried to challenge it, but have achieved nothing.


It is not excluded that (besides other hidden reasons) the motivation of the refusal of antibiotics, antibiotic ointment, and prescription of other medications - was dictated by an attempt to avoid any reports of my health problems in any medical documents, archives, laboratory reports, or pharmacy"s records: i.e. to conceal my next health misfortune.


Another motivation may be linked to mysterious financial claims, which were initially declared by a foreign state through the statements of the Federal Judge and Immigration"s Defender during the Federal Court hearing back in mid-1990-s. They claimed that, if we were taken from Warsaw to that country for free: we are debtors of that country for life. However, we were taken there against our will, which actually constitutes kidnapping, and, besides, 60 thousand dollars and many items of great value were stolen from us during this forcible removal from Warsaw. The kidnappers must compensate their victims, not the opposite! In that country, we were excessively exploited and robed, and, thus, on the contrary: this foreign state is our debtor!


Then the financial claims were expressed by an Immigration-affiliated doctor in MCI hospital, in connection with a fake (forged) Immigration "tubercular" fluorography (see in Book 1). Ignoring the fact that the falsified (by Canadian Federal Immigration) diagnosis "tuberculosis" not only did a serious blow to my health through all the stresses and administrative destruction of our immigration procedure, but also could put my health or even my life in danger by an unnecessary treatment, this bastard has threatened me by a "harsh punishment" (and by an "urological infection"!) for refusing to pay for tuberculosis treatment and for hospitalization in the Infectious Disease Unit. Then the financial claims were stated by Dr. Brian Morris, and by 3 other doctors, who denied me the most inexpensive medical procedures (like simple lab tests or ultrasounds), motivating the denial by those procedures" alleged expensive cost. 3 doctors (before Dr. Morris) expressed financial claims in 1996-1998 (especially Dr. Brzezinska), when I made so few visits to medical doctors and medical institutions that the public health system was absolutely saving on me. Innumerous suspicious accidents, diversions, provocations, and attacks have started by a suspicious infection 1 Jan. 2001, but, as a permanent series: few days before 11 Sep. 2001 [8 Sep. 2001 I could be killed by fallen objects from one building"s roof], and only by then I had to make much more visits to medical institutions.


Financial claims to a patient covered by the state Medicare card (public health insurance) are an extraordinary outrage, never practiced and never heard in Canada, and have something to do with my immigration case back in the 1990-s, and with foreign states' consulates.


I must also remind (see the book Nr. 1) that in 1999-2004 the Ministry of Immigration has invented (connecting it to financial claims) a fake "medical" case against my mother, using illegal, forged and falsified tests, bogus opinions, and ungrounded insinuations. Knowing that my mother has no place where to go, they made her inadmissible anyways (this was done when she already received the Quebec Selection Certificate and was on the stage of being granted Canadian citizenship) claiming that my mother"s state of health will demand too much money from public health system and social services. The formulation of her inadmissibility by Canadian Federal Immigration constituted an outraged definition in itself: "She is a danger to public health".


Therefore, it is absolutely clear that the "medical" financial claims were linked to my immigration file and to Canada's cozy relations with one foreign state and its almighty lobby in Canada, and to many branches of power and control in Canada, linked to that foreign state.


This is why medication were often given to me by good doctors (like Dr. Rohan, Dr. Krasny, Dr. Szego, Dr. Anna Khananyan, or Dr. Marie St.-Jacques; etc.) in their offices without prescription (because they were probably instructed about me in a particular way, and tried to go around strict restrictions about me); and this is why I was denied medications and tests by some bad doctors; and this is why I heard so many times that a medical procedure or a test, or a medication - are "too expensive" for the public health system, and, consequently, I was denied them. I doubt if such claims were expressed to any other patient in Canada in 1990 - beginning of 2000-s.


Applying this particular logic, we can guess that I was denied Fucidin cream (and was recommended Polysporin instead) because an antibiotic cream like Fucidin (which fight successfully a streptococci infection) is subsidized, will be given for free or by a reduced price in a drugstore, but Polisporin is not subsidized, and available only for its full price even with a medical prescription.


When my family doctor has refused even an ultrasound, referral to a surgeon, antibiotic cream and oral antibiotics, and urine test for microbiology culture, I visited 2 other doctors, who also denied me just everything.


Each time, when I went to doctors, I was accompanied by 1-2 police cars from my home to Metro station, and from another Metro station to doctor's medical office, or - by the time of my arrival - 1-2 police cars were already on place.


On June 4, 2014, on my way back from the doctor - approximately at 12.30, in a block away from my home, - I was knocked down by 2 youths.


When I have approached to an intersection where the street parallel to mine meets with a perpendicular street, I have seen a police car, from which they obviously watched me behind an intersection. Because of other cars (standing in the line) I could not see its board number, and, having decided to learn it, have crossed the street and have passed further forward. In the same second the police car has abruptly wrenched from the place, and, going to the back on good speed, has taxied on the following street, and has dashed away. But I have managed to catch a part of its board number: 15. It is the number of the police station of my area. I cannot tell for certain, but I am almost sure that it was the car 15-1 (or 15-13).


After police car has dashed away, I directed myself back, facing the corner of a corner house, and just there (at the corner) 2 individuals have run into me and have knocked me down. Where they came from is a next rebus. When I have crossed the street, there was no person in whole block, and - if someone would have appeared, could not manage to reach the corner from the central street. After all, I was a bit further the intersection for few seconds. There are no other explanations, besides that these 2 came out of one of the doors of the same house, or stepped out from a car (where, probably, waited for my emergence).


When falling - I have struck the left foot (or it was intentionally hit by those 2), and have "scratched" my back against the asphalt or concrete of the pavement. Next day a mild deterioration occurred: probably I got a new infection from the fall.


Approximately in half a year after those events this history has received an unexpected continuation. Someday, going home from Metro station, I have seen 2 young and very high guys of age under 30 exiting of one of the doors of that corner house, who, apparently, were close friends. They have sat down in a bulky and long American antiquarian car (such as Pontiac), and "have sailed away" parallel to the central street of the area. One was white; other was black. By all the signs, it seemed they were that 2 individuals that have knocked me down on June 4, 2014.


But something does not meet; something was not agreed with my experience and with my intuition. These guys looked too nice, and their image somehow did not match that artful incident. It is possible to assume that 2 young bandits very alike them were purposefully chosen to execute that act of terrorism, for - first, if something happens, to lead my investigation on a wrong track, and - secondly - simple due to an uncontrollable passion to mockeries and ridicule. Judging by many similar cases, probably, it is a special chic for terrorists.


7 days I struggled with the abscess (with a variable success), which on the 4-th day "has broken through". In most of the cases, if an abscess "has broken through", a fast recovery is guaranteed. Knowing all efficient natural (folk) remedies by heart and being able to prepare them, I applied them in the past with invariable success on myself and on others, quickly and completely achieving improvement and then complete healing. I also used warm compresses. Besides, I tried different pharmacy"s medication. I tasted Polysporin, Ikhtiol ointment, and other remedies, which have remained from the last "battle" with inflammations, furuncles and abscesses. But, oddly, this time nothing helped. At first - as though there came a serious improvement with an infiltrate exiting through an opened fistula, - but already literally in the next 3-4 hours there was a filling by the next "portion" of infection under skin, and swelling was formed again.


This is how the inflammation looked in the morning, on June 6, 2014. It is possible to notice that the reddening (inflammation) not only concentrates mainly around the cyst on an old scar, but has extended along the whole backbone: that testified about wider bacterial infection demanding treatment by antibiotics.


This is how the inflammation and the abscess looked in the evening, on June 6, 2014. Here it is visible that the inflammation began to extend not only along the vertebral deepening, i.e. vertically, but also "in breadth", i.e. in the horizontal length, which testified about the serious danger of such infection. A usual inflammation - in connection with an abscess - is localized in one place, but in my case it was not so. We can only guess about the reasons.


I will add this in my subsequent conclusions: I, to put it mildly, have "overestimated" the extent of deterioration after the falling (when I have been knocked down by 2 individuals after the visit to my family doctor on June 4, 2014).


Having looked through a bunch of documents, records, photos and facts, I came to a conclusion that only the suppuration process in the one and only tiny area has "gone uphill" after that incident. But the general inflammation (reddening, rash) then was already shown "in all its beauty". Therefore, it should be noticed that on June 4, 2014, outwardly the picture just a little bit differed.


Any one, looking at this terrible picture, will find no words to characterize the fact that 3 doctors have sent me home 4 - 8 of June, 2014 (when I have come with a repeated urgent visit to my family doctor) - without giving an advice to address in ER; without prescribing oral antibiotics or an external antibiotic treatment; without sending me for a swab test, ultrasound and X-ray (I explained that the cyst formed on an old scar); and without having named the diagnosis (abscess).


I can only assume that - splashing the saliva in rage - Dr. Morris, possibly, used all his improbable influence in medical circles to persuade the medical authorities for blocking me an access to antibiotics and to medical procedures. Later, I have fully understood (after a series of the followed tragic events), what enormous power doctor Morris has, but - by then - I did not realize it yet.


However, I don't want to demonize the image of Dr. Morris. In the beginning, doctor Morris behaved even less unethically than Dr. Gerskovits, Dr. Sprull, Dr. Anna Crerar (or Tsrerar), Dr. Sermet, Dr. J. P. Rowen, and others. Of course, he, certainly, behaved unethically in general, judging by his quick-tempered, violent nature, disrespect to patients, and negligence, but, unlike those who - under a pretext of imaginary patient's "hypohondria" or "panic" - sabotaged the whole medical care, Doctor Morris at least TRIED to provide some (even if very limited) medical help, and did it as a doctor, who was highly appreciating his profession. Unfortunately, not only his quick-tempered nature and intolerance to others and their opinions have torpedoed this noble mission, but also his politically-motivated hostility towards me (which has taken roots among some physicians who began to influence his decisions and his acts). Otherwise, there is not possible to explain in any way many of his actions.


As a result, Dr. Morris had not renewed the prescriptions (issued by my previous urologist) of absolutely necessary Flomax, Celebrex, Oxybutyn, etc.; he has refused transrectal prostate ultrasound or MRI; and later was regularly refusing ultrasounds, laboratory tests, and antibiotics (prescribing antibiotics ONLY in the dramatic emergency situations, generated by his previous refusal of antibiotics and other medical mistreatment). 2 types of alpha-blockers and other medicaments could prevent 2 surgeries, stones formation in the urological tract, and timely issued 1-2 courses of antibiotics could prevent the whole sequence of chronic infections.


Transrectal ultrasound, or CT-scan (computer tomography), or MRI (as an alternative to cystoscopy) could confirm my assumption that, as a result of an infection and criminally carried out cystoscopy (by Dr. Pharand (2003), who literarily forced me to do this barbaric procedure without any need in it), temporary obstruction of both bladder and intestines has developed. It, probably, not only caused a terrible allergic reaction together with a dangerous acute prostate-bladder infection, but also damaged the internal organs and left a stricture.


I informed Dr. Morris in an oral and written form about my opinion and about the opinion of my non-Montreal urologist, Dr. El-Hackim, but Dr. Morris wanted to listen nothing.


Among other things, I also told Dr. Morris that my non-Montreal urologist (Dr. El-Hackim) said few years ago that, probably, my problems could be resolved by a surgery (because he, probably, even by then suspected an obstruction), but, unfortunately, I did not react to his words properly by then, and has not asked him for more details about it. It could be a consequence of repressions, to which I was exposed, and regular stopping and monitoring by police, which made me worried and upset, and I reacted to doctor"s words differently than could react in my normal state. However, besides this factor, there was an additional factor: Dr. El-Hackim told me that he is not working in a hospital, and, for a better outcome, such a complicated surgery had to be performed as a planned (in advance) operation, and by a surgeon, who's a member of the staff.


Doctor Morris, hectically insisting on cystoscopy, also stubbornly refused to perform cystoscopy on MY conditions (with a preventive course of antibiotics and a guarantee that if - after this procedure - something goes wrong, he promises to arrange an urgent appointment for me in his office, without forcing me to go to ER (where they apply brutal and cruel treatment), and - thereby - has unintentionally closed for me this diagnostic procedure, at the same time refusing also so-called "virtual cystoscopy".


But the oddest sequence of events happened, when Dr. Morris has realized that he was wrong and that he has allowed a number of gross errors in both medical treatment and in the medical ethics" code, and began to cover-up his own wrongdoings, for the cost of his patient"s health detriment, and has committed a lot of unethical, brutal, and even illegal (and, probably, criminal) actions.


Now, going back to above described abscess ordeal: from June 8 to June 10, 2014, I have visited 4 more doctors, and all of them have refused me the medical care (concerning the abscess).


Even if imagine that 2 days prior to June 6, 2014, the situation would be much less serious, such knowledgeable doctors (all 8 of them), and, especially, such an extra-class doctor as my family doctor - no doubt - should know what to expect already in next few days after the abscess" examination - but, still, sent me home without any medical care.


Parallel to the abscess (on a cyst on an old scar), the general process of skin degradation, connected, apparently, to refusal of the treatment of hepatic phenomena, to misbalance between mensual bacteria and allergens, to development of the opportunistic infections, and the refusal (by doctors) of antibiotic therapy for UTI treatment. It is possible to notice on that picture (June 7, 2014) a set of very recently formed skin "marks" on hands, shoulders and breasts, which were absent up to May-June, 2014.


The same problems on the back and shoulders. June 6, 2014.


I did not use all the "domestic" remedies known to me to cope with the abscess not only because of the extremely constrained financial and social situation. Here was also impossibility to go for ingredients' purchase, and to reach an abscess in an inconvenient (for independent self-treatment) area due to what the schedule of applying the remedies was broken, and so on... So, the antibiotics were absolutely necessary.


CHAPTER 4.


On June 11, 2014, I have resolutely turned to my family doctor, and have literally demanded antibiotic ointment, antibiotics, or a referral for an urgent examination by a surgeon. He has sent me to "Surgical Day Center" at St.-Mary"s hospital, having written out a referral.


On the same day I have called there, but the secretary has answered that one of THEIR doctors-surgeons must refer me to this clinic, not my family doctor. This was, certainly, a nonsense because, in that case, who should refer me to one of these surgeons, if not family doctor?


On June 11, 2014, I also asked the family doctor to arrange an X-ray of my left foot concerning the blow, when I was knocked down - but was refused.


My family doctors" referral to the "Surgical Day Center Clinic" (Surgical Day Center) at St.-Mary"s hospital (June 11, 2014).


Then, despite a temporary improvement, the basic healing has not occurred. Up to the evening, on June 11, 2014, I still hoped that "this time will be OK", and that the abscess will disappear "by itself". However, after night from 11 to 12 June, 2014, a very strong swelling, even more tight was formed again, and I called the Surgical Day Center again, and - this time another employee ("another voice") - have refused to accept me.


On June 13, 2014, at 7:30 a.m., I have arrived to St.-Mary"s ER. I did not have a wide choice: in offices of other hospitals" ER they already just refused to accept me several times, and, after waiting more than 12 hours for not even the main examination by a doctor or doctors, but only for a triage nurse"s assessment or a preliminary exam, I have been forced to leave, and went to a walk-in clinic or in one of the 3 hospitals where they - at least - show me to a doctor: St.-Mary's, Notre-Dame, or Jean-Talon.


The waiting-line number taken on June 13, 2014, in ER.


It has appeared that all permanent premises of office of ER were closed: there was a major renovation-reconstruction. Temporarily the ER was displaced to a wing corridor - where earlier, probably, was one of the "out-patients" clinics, or utility rooms.


All the permanent personnel from this ER Department was absent (sent on days-off? holidays?), and, instead, all doctors and nurses were absolutely new (all: young people).


The patients waited on the chairs and benches directly in the corridor.


No chambers spies, no surveillance cameras, no security guards.


And the treatment (which I received) was CONSIDERABLY DIFFERENT. I passed the triage nurse and the registration very quickly.


And only after that the problems "were drawn". Since the ER have been placed temporarily in hospital"s western wing, each patient should put his or her own chart in the wall plastic holder sideways from a door of this or that room. Someone's medical file already lay there. I was surprised that soon a man not in a while but in dark blue dressing gown (which are technical workers like cleaners or carriers, etc., are wearing) has got one of the folders from there and left with it.


When I approached, I notices that my file is not there anymore. In 1,5-2 hours, not earlier, my chart has again appeared in the plastic holder, and, it means that no one still took my chart to a medical office. Thus, someone has deliberately delayed my appearance in the doctor's office for one and a half or 2 hours. If not the repairing-renovation, and the displacement of ER, I would never learn about such tricks.


Another "interesting" question: where the person in dark blue special clothes has carried my medical file?


A copy of my request to the Medical Archive for June 13, 2014 (see above).


It was the very 1-st time, when there were no assaults, no provocations, no humiliations, no mockeries, no insults. All medical workers were nice people and behaved nicely.


Doctors, medical secretaries, nurses, and even the triage nurse: everyone just did the work, without trying to distort the facts or to deceive their patient. However, the absence of my medical chart, which was taken away somewhere by a man in a deep-blue uniform is throwing a scary shadow even on this positive (in general) experience. Here is the triage nurse"s report (see below):


A copy of the triage nurse report from June 13, 2014. This time - no blatant medical remarks, provocations, etc. Here is only a constructive, working information, and nothing else. No police Gestapo tricks. No "state secrets", such as a concealment of a name of a nurse or a doctor, exam or procedure"s time. In all records an exact time (not only "general", but also according to the sections) is accurately specified.


Judging by name, the nurse, apparently, was a Latin American origin. She has responsibly and adequately done her work.


A copy of the emergency doctor"s official report, June 13, 2014 (see above). And here, too: no cruel, deceptive, spy tricks. No doubts in the correctness and truthfulness of my words. All the records - are objective; no distortions of my explanations: even when the report is telling that my family doctor has sent me to the One Day Surgery Clinic (Surgical Day Center), and they have refused to accept me there. Moreover, the exclamation mark reflects doctor"s indignation of that fact. Not only doctor S. Cecer, but also other young medics - who were talking to me that day, - have told me that in the One Day Surgery Clinic (Surgical Day Center) they had no right to "get rid" of me if my family doctor had referred me there, but, on the contrary: have been OBLIGED to accept me URGENTLY (immediately).


NONE of the pages filled in by St.-Mary"s emergency doctors that day has been withdrawn or concealed; all of them reflect a high professionalism and responsibility of medical workers.


EVERYTHING was done absolutely correctly and in due time - if to "forget" about an objective crisis of ERs of Montreal"s hospitals and about intolerable and unfairly long hours of waiting. But even here - in my case - an objective explanation is present. The X-ray and the ultrasound procedures, and the blood test, together with the interpretation-reading of the received data: demanded considerable time necessary for results" outcome.


As an example of professionalism and medical impartiality (apolitical objectivity, etc.) - I provide 3 more official medical reports dated the same of the 13th of June, 2015 (see below):


(I provide the copies of these pages as an example of a cardinal contrast to reports, filled out during last years by such doctors as Stephen Gerskovits, Deborah Faystein-Silverberg (ZilberBerg), Donald Sprull, and others: to show, how slaying-like are looking against these purely medical [without any "profiling"] documents false records of other doctors in the same St.-Mary"s ER, who were examining me in past years.)


One more page of the same on June 13, 2014. (See below)


When, after all, I was examined by a very young doctor (so young and pretty that I have took her for an intern), I have received an exclusive reception and attention.


Before I have managed to pronounce and ask for it, she has already declared (having glanced into my medical file and having examined the abscess) that sends me for an ultrasound test, and for a blood test. (This is what I've suggested myself: to exclude streptococci intoxication of the bloodstream). I, in my turn, have demanded an antibiotic ointment and oral antibiotics in any case (will be the abscess surgically opened or not). She has promised this as well.


Then, soon enough, I was examined by a surgeon-trainee (intern), a very young and nice guy looking like a Chinese origin. And he was also exclusively polite, and I, in my opinion, have received a mutual sympathy. Nobody before him has examine me in this ER with such a care and responsibility. Moreover, he did not make the conclusions "for himself", and did not mutter unwillingly in reply to my inquiries, but kindly and willingly shared his findings. He has told that the abscess is relatively small, but very dangerous and complex, and that he considers: it is necessary to open it surgically. But he has warned that he is a trainee (an intern), and cannot take a decision without his supervisor. He also warned that it may be a long, painful and difficult surgery.


Everything has developed in such a way that it was necessary to wait for many hours.


I (who has got used that in the offices of Montreal hospitals" ERs my words were always met with irony, mockery and sarcasm) was struck and touched that this young surgeon has not even a single thought to doubt my story of how nearly 30 years ago I was stubbed or pricked with something sharp in the back in Minsk"s Metro, and how years later a cyst has formed on top of that wound, and how it began to be inflamed 2-4 times per year.


Running forward, I will notice again that later 2 girls-surgeons who were carrying out the surgical opening, have confirmed a trace from that old scar.


I was taken abide that, instead of an ultrasound, I was called for an X-ray. But it has appeared that the doctor has appointed both an X-ray, and ultrasonography. I have quickly realized, that exactly my narrative about the events of almost 30-years back has provoked this X-ray test to check the integrity of the vertebrae bones. (The incident took place in the same year when Minsk"s underground Metro (subway) was just constructed. Then after that stubbing there was a small suppuration, and years later a cyst formed).


Naturally, even if I was stubbed or pricked 30 years ago, all the same it was necessary to check, whether any bone has suffered from a blow of a scalpel, knife, pricker or needle.


While I have passed all tests and while has waited for a resident doctor, it was already 16:10. I have stayed the whole day on the corridor, on an inconvenient chair, and, moreover, few hours it was necessary to stand simply because the chairs did not suffice for all the patients (I must remind that the permanent premises of ER were under reconstruction).


It is necessary to add the pain from the abscess and the psychological intolerableness of the waiting. Besides, I ate nothing the whole day, and did not drink at all (and to drink, when you have an abscess, is necessary much more often than usually).


Finally, the "main surgeon", surrounded by the whole suite flock of students-trainees (interns) has come. It has appeared that this (reminded a Chechen) still quite young and polite man, speaks Russian! He, too, has treated me very much friendly and properly, talked to me very kindly, and has explained everything extremely clear and laconically. I will repeat that yet did not see such a warm reception and such a friendly treatment in this ER. This surgeon demonstrated a real human approach. It is a pity that I stood all the time a back to him (because he was examining the abscess on my back), and had no chance to see his name on his identification card.


"The main surgeon" has told that it is definitely necessary to open the abscess, and has asked me, if I agree. I have nodded.


I was told to climb up a high surgical table-couch, and the trainees (interns) have crowded around me: the same Chinese-looking intern guy, and 3 girls by sight 22-24 years-old, so beautiful as from Hollywood. Right there was also the head doctor (the "main surgeon") who was speaking Russian. All tools have been prepared, including scissors, scalpel, etc. On the same iron support a syringe with Novocain has been prepared.


And here, when they already were literally inclined over me to begin the surgical operation, something has unexpectedly occurred. Suddenly all of them have disappeared in the next room, and the last girl - before leaving, - has warned me that I should not stand up since they "right now will return".


I guessed immediately if such a turn was man"s in dark blue uniform (who, on the order of someone, who knew the expected events and counted on such an occurrence) purpose, and this is why he took away my medical chart somewhere to postpone a very expected surgical procedure for 1,5 - 2 hours: to provoke a surgery carried out by inexperienced very young surgeons.


I have lain in an inconvenient pose more than 20 minutes, and then have jumped down to the floor. It was senseless to remain farther in such an uncomfortable pose. Voices of 6 or 7 people were distributed from the next room. It is unclear, why one or two of them could not perform the surgery while the others confer.


Then one of them showed up and told that some of them were called for an urgent operation (including the "main surgeon") and that I have to put on my clothes, and to wait again on the corridor. It can take 2-3 hours, the Russian-speaking surgeon has told to me.


Something really bizarre and very suspicious occurred. I never heard that a patient was ever sent away from an operating room"s surgery table, and could I not find (on Internet) any similar event in Montreal. And the very fact that it happened not to someone else, but to me (to a person, persecuted by police and politicians for pure political reasons, who already had bizarre and unusual experience in the Emergency Rooms): sends a chilly frightening signal.


Soon my wife has arrived there. I already was sitting there for almost 11 hours! She was also shocked that I was sent away from the operation-room, where I was already lying on the surgical table in the operation position, and the surgeons have almost started the procedure. We were even more confused, when saw the "main surgeon" on the corridor, where he not supposed to be, but supposed to perform an urgent surgery (for which, allegedly, they all left me, and ran to save someone"s life). [Something else stroke me by then, and only years later, looking through my notes, I learned that the "main surgeon's" identification breast card was already removed from his medical clothes, and disappeared.]


It was so scary to have an operation under such unusual circumstances, that I began to hesitate if to agree for a surgery today. Later I have caught "the main surgeon" on the corridor, and have once again asked, whether a slightest possibility for a conservative treatment - still remained. He looked also confused and disturbed by something, and I saw a sort of an uncertainty in his eyes, which could be provoked exclusively by something really extraordinary in such a good, positive man. It is possible that he was considering - which danger is greater for me: a threat of something unknown and disturbing (which sent me away from the surgery out to the corridor again) - or a danger from abscess" complications.


He has answered that if not to open the abscess right now, it will be much worse. After the surgery, I became convinced that he was right.


When 3 or 4 young doctors have returned, I was operated by 2 very young girls, one of whom has told me (I did not ask her, but she felt something, or just prevented possible questions) that she is a resident doctor, not an intern. She told that speaks French, English, Spanish and Arabic (which was a surprise, because she did not look like an Arab not only due to her secular look, but also because of her light skin, and more likely European features; probably, she was a Christian from Syria).


Another one, most likely, was a Scottish origin.


Both have asked, how I managed to keep an excellent form at my age.


It shocked me a little, when the "resident" has approached to me with a scalpel in her hand, "having forgotten" a syringe and Novocain on a little table. She has answered my puzzled question by stressing that an anaesthetizing injection is almost as painful, as a cut, when it concerns an abscess or a furuncle, but I have insisted. I would like, I said, not to have a heart attack or not to faint from the pain-shock - and to get to reanimation. I have also asked to do an injection not in the abscess directly, but slightly nearby. Especially (I have added) that the freezing works so much better.


She has agreed with it, but has noticed that not even every doctor knows about such specific details, and I, for some reason, know.


I also have asked to do the drainage cut lengthways, instead of across, and the different depth, depending on abscess structure. And she has agreed with it, too. The shot of Novocain, was, really, terribly painful. And, even after the freezing, I felt every cut as though she cut "on live", without local anesthesia. But that"s such my fate: to suffer.


I have asked to make an attempt at the same time to find and remove the cyst if it is possible in the conditions of present suppuration. The girls have told that it is hardly possible, but that they have found and have removed something that may be a cyst though completely are not sure. They also have warned me that - before leaving (before going home) antibiotics should be prescribed for me.


On my request to take the infiltrate"s sample (to see if this is a streptococcus, staphylococci, or any another infection), the girl-"resident" has taken right there a special tool - and did it. She has told that if any special resistant microorganisms will be found, someone will call me. All my requests have been executed. Improbable!


The result of ultrasound (June 13, 2014). Is that possible to compare THIS report to dishonest and biased results of ultrasound vascular tests in 2007 (after I was hit by a car)?! Here everything is characterized accurately and clearly. Any half-words. The abscess, fortunately, has not extended out of limits of the top layers, has not got into the muscles. Its exact sizes were precisely specified. Abundantly clear that this official report "is not politized". (See above)


The result of the X-ray made on June 13, 2014, in ER (St.-Mary"s hospital). (see below)


The microbiological analysis (culture) of the infiltrate sample - has revealed (June 13, 2014) gram-positive pepto-streptococcus, which only at the 1-st look appears like a typical for "all" abscesses bacterium. For, having studied a list of those types of abscesses - where this bacterium usually appears, - we will hardly find a mention of an abscess on a backbone. Pepto-streptococcus, as well as entherococci (which was already found in me twice!) - is a gram-positive opportunistic commensal infection (i.e. such that, first, is a symbiosis of 2 organisms [the bacterium and the host] - and, thus, represents a normal flora; and, secondly, provokes an infectious pathogenesis only in people with a weakened immune system, or with a chronic infection, etc.). One more of its features: the pepto-streptococcus is an obligate anaerobe, i.e. it is tolerant only to a limited presence of oxygen (if I am not mistaken, a unique streptococcal infection of that kind). Therefore, its presence in an abscess "instead of" a "normal" streptococcal infection already - in itself - puts on guard, and that the pepto-streptococcus was not destroyed after some days (before the surgery), when the abscess "has spontaneously broken through" and had a drainage (and, it means, the oxygen began to flow to the opened fistula in concentration that definitely exceeding 8 percent) - is doubly strange.


Any abscess on a vertebral column, even the most microscopic one, is considered life-threatening, and demands an immediate course of antibiotics and an opening surgery. ANY doctor is OBLIGED - even without patient"s demand - to apply IMMEDIATELY medical measures (an urgent treatment) to an abscess (which is always bearing a threat of a bacteremia (blood poisoning) and threatening by penetration of an infection into backbone, etc.) on the spinal column. And, if this was not done: this is an alarming conspiracy. But that on June 4, 2014 my family doctor and 7 (!) other doctors have refused ANY TREATMENT and, in particular: to administrate - concerning spinal cord abscess - antibiotics, to prescribe antibiotic cream, and to refer me to a surgeon; this was an outraged violation of human rights, not only a medical mischief. And the refusal of St.-Mary"s hospital"s Day Surgery Clinic to allow me an access to a surgeon, when my family doctor has, finally, issued such a reference: this was an even more serious incident - this was already a criminal offence. (I can assume only that the main responsibility for these crimes lies on doctor Morris and on others, similar to him individuals: who in literal sense have blocked for me an access to antibiotics and to life-saving medical help).


When - after the cut - they began to squeeze out the abscess" content (if I am not mistaken: a disputable technique [risk even a bigger infection?]; but an unequivocal opinion in this respect does not exist; in a retrospective: this was the right decision, because, if the pepto-streptococcal infection has not disappeared after a self-opening of the abscess, such a method has prevented a new recurrence), - I did not stop them though the pain became simply other-wordly. I read in the surgical literature that sometimes it helps.


Generally, up to this point everything was done correctly both from human, and from medical perspective: for the first time during a long history of my visits to this and 2 other ERs. But only up to this point. Because - literally one second prior to bandage, which was placed on the wound, the "resident"s" phone has revived. After that call, I think, all troubles have started. Outwardly no changes occurred. I have asked to put an antibiotic cream into the wound (if they have it). The "resident" has told "yes", and that she will satisfy my request. But when I have asked, where to go for changing the bandages, she has answered that the abscess is small enough, so, I can just take it off in 2 days [the bandaging "sticker"]. (It would be a mistake to consider this answer as an indication that 2 female doctors have sent me home without any prescription, instructions, and a schedule of follow-ups). They also told me that - before leaving home - SURELY to address in the registry, and to receive all the "medical appointments", "referrals", and "prescriptions" there, and not to leave without obtaining all papers and instructions.


Than I have asked them how to wash out the wound after bandaging removal. It was responded to me that simply "under a shower, with a soap".


I don"t know if their supervisor would do a better job (after this surgery my back looks so terrible as if it was a major surgery there, not an operation to treat a tiny abscess), but I believe that they did everything correctly and according to all existing norms, with human approach, and as good as their skills and experience allowed them.


Nevertheless, I have asked to refer me to a CLSC nurse in my area. Later, judging that I left the hospital without any referral, ointment and antibiotics, I have made a wrong conclusion that my request was - softly - but rejected. However, when I, having obtained all the copies from the medical archive (for June 13, 2015), and undertaken studying them, I have found (see above) a referral to CLSC in 2 similar documents; thus, not specifically to nurse for bandagings, but in general under CLSC"s observation. If I am correctly informed, 2 copies of the referral to CLSC - is a usual practice, because 1 copy is intended to be given to the patient, and the 2-nd one: for sending directly to CLSC.


From the same source I know that if a patient, leaving ER, has not received this or that document, prescription, or instruction, this patient surely should be contacted within 12 hours. But nor from CLSC (which testifies that nothing was sent there), neither from the hospital nobody has called me, and this is already a triple sabotage.


After the surgery, I went to receptionist-secretary and tried to find out in the registry, where are: the prescription of antibiotic ointment, oral antibiotics, and the referral to CLSC, - but achieved and received nothing. I had to go home without ointment, antibiotics, instructions and the referral.


A non-standard situation (the repairing works in ER unit) and the concrete combination of circumstances have presented a unique possibility to reconstruct the whole mechanism of sabotage of medical care and blasting my health.


First: a man in a dark-blue non-medical uniform takes away my medical chart for 1,5-2 hours, which, possibly, resulted in surgery"s delay, which, in turn, led to a situation, when the surgery was performed by non-experienced surgeons. Secondly, I was sent away to the corridor-waiting-area literarily from the surgery table in the operation-room, where the surgery procedure formally already started; nothing like this ever happened to any other patient. Thirdly, a phone call to the operation-room (where I came now the 2-nd time) has actually interrupted the completion of the surgical procedure: possibly, an urgent call of 2 young girls-surgeons from the operation-room (where they have performed the abscess surgical opening on my back). [A possible purpose of this call might be to tear off their communication with me, and - in the conditions of time trouble - not to allow them to explain in details how to deal with the post-surgery situation, to issue all necessary documents, and to organize and order all post-operational procedures.]


After that call, possibly, there was no time for them to write out the prescriptions and the referral to CLSC by their own hand. It is possible to assume, that they have issued these medical appointments "on the way" "through" an ordinate or triage office (or etc.), or have entrusted to someone else.


When I, accompanied by my wife, came to the registry, there was a shift turn, and we had to wait. Then the registry"s secretary sent me to the waiting room twice, ordering to "wait". Then she was replaced by another one (probably, the shift change) who spoke to us absolutely differently: roughly and impatiently as though I was accused of something, and she has flatly refused to find out, where are the referral to CLSC for me and the prescriptions.


When she literally "kicked" me out, I have not left the hospital. I waited again for my turn, and have addressed to her again. Then she has demanded that I should leave the hospital building immediately, and even has threatened me by police or security guards.


I describe all this in order to explain, how much time I have spent in the registry secretariat (quite enough for my medical file [chart] - together with all the prescriptions, instructions, post-surgery follow-ups, and the referral to CLSC - to arrive there) - and also in order to show clearly that I was roughly expelled from the hospital (not to mention that I was already on verge of extreme fatigue and fainting, and I had to leave for this reason as well).


What happened with the referral to CLSC and with prescriptions, and why I was refused them in the registry office? Were those documents withdrawn (taken away), too, by the "person in dark-blue uniform", or the sabotage has been organized at the level of the registration nurse-secretary? And why - even if I was refused the referral, and could not take it myself to the destination - the hospital did not send this referral to CLSC through electronic communications, which, as far as I know, happens automatically, regardless patient"s demand. (In next days I called there 3 times, and, still, achieved nothing).


If the referral has been sent - as it was obligatory - I would receive a call from there surely (nice and obligatory people work in my CLSC). Later I contacted CLSC myself, but was told that St.-Mary's hospital sent no referral to them.


After the whole ordeal, I could not go home neither by bus, nor by Metro; my wife has called our daughter with the car. In the car - I sat not fastened, across the sitting, by the sick back to the window: it was impossible to seat otherwise.


2 next days the pain was such as a scalpel cut was just made. The wound burnt under the bandage terribly, burnt down with fire. I was sitting on Advil, but even the anaesthetizing did not help.


Here I must add to the description in the original (written right after the real events), and to its 1-st edition - the following conclusions (on the basis of complete audit of photos, documents, records and other sources). 2 young doctors, for certain, issued the referral to CLSC, and prescribed antibiotics and the antibiotic ointment, and have taken care of the organization of bandaging in CLSC, but, by means of some bureaucratic and organizational dodges someone has arranged a sabotage. It is possible to assume that partially it has been arranged by means of the medical secretary who was on duty in the "reception window" of the temporary ER office at St.-Mary"s hospital. She, despite my statements about the - "guaranteed" by doctors - referral to CLSC, antibiotics and antibiotic ointment, ordered me "to go home", "to leave the hospital building immediately", and "not to take away time" from so overloaded medics.


Then - before going home, - I asked the copies of the results-reports of ultrasound, X-ray, and infiltrate"s microbiological culture, but have achieved nothing.


Thus, the medical personnel were not responsible for the guilt of non-medical workers, who literally sabotaged all post-operational procedures, prescriptions, and follow-ups. For the first time for many years I was treated properly in ER, and everything was made from the side of the medics just ideally. Conclusions what can be made of this comparison, are given below.]


When - 2 days later, - I have removed the bandaging, I have seen a terrible picture. The back was mutilated as if I went through inquisition"s tortures-nippers. A characteristic for abscesses red-pinkish layer has again spread around the wound, but now 3 times wider than before the surgical procedure. The abscess not only has not disappeared, but became almost 4 times bigger.


Having looked narrowly, I have found out that the surgical opening has been performed satisfactory (I cannot tell more, without being an expert).


(A tiny cross-section cut, contrary to my objection, has been made after all, and now was of use a bad service [when I asked the 2 young surgeons not to do it, they promised to respect my wish, but, still, did it], but about this: later, below; however, if the registry"s secretary and other hospital"s workers would have given me out everything that doctors appointed - the whole healing procedure would go in a radically different way).


The major problem was made not by scalpel, but by the policy in relation to bandaging. It was necessary to change the bandage at least 2 times per day, instead of 1 time in 2 days. From here arose the terrible state of the wound with the got-out rags of skin and meat; a bigger swelling in the center of the abscess has formed, and has literally turned the cut inside out.


A special gauze with a sticky strip along the edges (on the perimeter) has been pasted on the top. Under it - a special medical fabric (rectangular shape) has been put on the wound. Everything is correct. It is strictly in accordance with the protocol. But this "rectangle" has been bended half-and-half (that already in itself obstruct the infiltrate"s outflow), and though, probably, it has also been made according to the norms (a surgeon or a surgical nurse could confirm or repute it), but - when the top, protective gauze, has been taken off - it has appeared that it pasted to the wound in a special way, not letting the pus and lymph to get out.


In my opinion, solely a vertical cut would do a better service, and the tiny horizontal cut has done a disservice.


Thus, the main reason of deterioration after the surgical opening and drainage consisted in the complete absence of post-operational measures: it was necessary to do the bandagings (possibly, at least 1 time, or (better) 2 times per day); to prescribe antibiotics and the antibiotic ointment; to refer me to CLSC; and to give me additional instructions.


On Monday morning (June 16, 2014) I went to a walk-in clinic. Reconsidered, I exited from there and at first have come into another walk-in clinic, in 10 minutes of walking.


There were just few people there; in 20 minutes I already sat in the examination room. The doctor was shocked that in ER they did not appoint any bandaging. While I have reached the policlinic, the wound looked even more awfully: there were fat blood streams around, lymph and infiltrate. Even the doctor was terrified. But nothing was done for me. My request for antibiotics for external and oral use - has been refused by the doctor. He insisted, that I must go again to the same ER where I was operated. I was forced to go to another policlinic.


The view of the abscess in 3 days after the surgical opening.


The view of the abscess in 4 or 5 days after opening.


The view of the abscess on June 18, 2014, i.e. in 5 days after opening.


It is well visible that the abscess was - and remained - "untouched".


And it all happened not because the surgical opening and drainage were done inadequately.


First, I think that - by time of the surgical operation end girls-surgeons - they already known about the causative agent of the infection (pepto-streptococci). Knowing that this microorganism perishes in the open air (at oxygen"s concentration of above 8 percent), they have advised to take off the bandage in 2 days - and later to refuse the bandaging.


In reality, something was wrong with it, and, without the CLSC"s observation and the antibiotics, the abscess restored itself again. Whether "mine" pepto-streptococci has appeared resistant against the oxygen, whether this bacterium had multiplied too quickly, whether some "help" for it was arriving from another place, whether my body sent antibodies for fighting the infection too intensively (forming "pulp" products from streptococcus"s disintegration - favorable for an infection) - but an improvement after the surgical opening has minimized, and the situation threatened to return "into place".


I will stress that if I - after the surgery - have learnt at once that the causative agent of this infection is pepto-streptococci, I would organize bandaging so that the wound should "breathed" more, and, having seen that the progress is minimum, would demand antibiotics even more persistently.


On June 20, 2014, I went to the medical archive of St.-Mary's hospital (my wife took me there by car), and has demanded copies of all documents from ER for June 13, 2014, including the infiltrate's analysis (the microbiologic culture test) in an URGENT ORDER. They refused to hand me over these documents, and, after I filled (again!) a special form, I was told that they will send those copies by mail. However, up to 10 of July, 2014, no copies arrived. By this cruel act hospital"s archive has deprived me of learning about the essential things, which could help me to heal myself in a situation when I was denied ANY medical help.


Then I went to the same archive repeatedly, and my first application (as well as its destiny) was not found. They demanded from me to fill newly the same application form (again!), and to wait again the monthly term. (See above, the file abscess-med-archive1.jpg).


The requested documents have arrived by mail only on August 13, 2014 (2 months after the surgical intervention, and almost 2 months after my 1-st request to the archive!). The norm - under the law - no more than 30 days from the date of the application. It is interesting to notice that I have not seen any post stamp on this envelope, though studied the surface from both sides under a magnifying glass. Does it mean that the letter was delivered by courier, and was thrown into my mail box? But then how the courier could get to the entrance: the door is always "on the lock" for strangers. It is the postman who has the keys. In that case, the courier should call - and to hand over the envelope to me, but this envelope has been thrown into the mail box. It is obvious that they used a doubtful (if not illegal) trick to do so that I should not have any proof on what date this envelope arrived.


A number of documents definitely were missing, especially these, which could explain how they could send me home without antibiotics, antibiotic cream, access to CLSC's nurse bandaging, and other essential medical measures and documents, and without them my suffering was artificially turned into torture that lasted 8-9 months and left a number of complications (dermatological complications, more scar tissue formation, new profound wound or even wounds, esthetical disfiguring of my back, and many others). I believe that it was a part of the oppressive McGill medical administration"s persecutions "program", and that I was punished for who I am and how I see the world.


So, the epic of abscess has thrown me under real torture only because of 1) the refusal of a timely referral to a surgeon by my family doctor; refusal of oral antibiotics and antibiotic cream, etc. (see above); (it can be related to Doctor Morris's personal persecution); 2) the sabotage of the access to a surgeon (by the secretaries of St.-Mary's above-named clinic), which had to be guaranteed by the referral, which finally (though with huge delay) my family doctor issued to the One Day Surgery Clinic (Surgical Day Center) of St.-Mary's hospital; 3) the sabotage of the access to prescriptions of antibiotics, antibiotic ointment, referral to CLSC, and copies of medical tests (all administrated by emergency doctors); and, 4) the sabotage of the delivery of the copies of medical documents by St-Mary's hospital archive. It is impossible even to assume that all these cases could be separate events, instead of result of well-coordinated and politically motivated persecution in medical institutions of the city of Montreal.


In November-December 2014, another abscess appeared on top of the former one, which was surgically opened in July. I could not get an appointment with my family doctor, but was seen by Dr. Wang and 2 other dermatologists. Dr. Wang again refused to do anything for this problem"s solution, and other dermatologists demanded 100 and 150 dollars for unknown tests and for another foreseeable medical procedure. Without any clear explanation about this, and having no resources to pay for an expensive private medical program, this was not a solution.


I did not ask the same from Dr. St.-Jacques (a compassionate and conscious doctor-dermatologist) in 2014 and in the beginning of 2015, as she already did too many favors for me. The same is concerning Dr. Richard Dubuc, another dermatologist, who helped me a lot, but retired probably in 2014 or in 2015 (Dr. St.-Jacques also retired soon, despite her relatively young age for retirement).


In autumn 2015, and in January-February 2016, the cyst on my back with the scars from the abscess surgery has inflamed again, and both times I had the appointments with Dr. Wang, who (repeatedly) refused to help me.


In 2015-2016, I demanded a referral from my family doctor to a surgeon (to assess the cyst on my back and to remove it), and he refused again. I believe that he just could not do it. I had tremendous health issues in 2015-2017; he did many favors for me, and was not able to provide for me an unlimited help: this is how this system works. Dr. Wang, however, as I suggest, could refer me to a surgeon, could administer an ultrasound test (if she doubted my self-diagnosis "frequently infected cyst") and, at least, a course of abscesses' treatment. I had an appointment with Dr. Wang on 4 February 2016, at 10:00.


The same concerns 2 other dermatologists and doctors in Westmount Plaza, rue Guy, and other walk-in clinics, whose refusal to render any medical help was just an act of cruelty.


In 2016 - 2017, I had a tremendous health drama, artificially provoked by Dr. Brian Morris and by other doctors, and the case of the frequently infected cyst on my back has receded in the shadow. However, on July 20, 2015, at 14:00, I saw Dr. Wang again, and addressed to her with a number of problems, including the frequently infected cyst on my back. And was refused a referral to a surgeon again. Having no help from Dr. Wang on absolutely all issues, I came to Dr. Viviott (dermatologist) with few very tormenting and acute problems, which overshadowed the inflamed cyst dilemma.


On September 21, 2017, I paid an emergency visit to MetroMedic (walk-in clinic) - due to a serious infection inside my finger after a cut. I also demanded help concerning just another infection on the back, on top of the same cyst. Dr. Roger G. Guy, an aged doctor, has ignored my abnormal suffering, ignored the badly-looking state of my R. Hand index finger, ignored the radiography report, ignored a badly-looking inflammation or infection of the back (on the cyst), and refused any prescription and referral to specialists. I demanded an anti-inflammatory medication (to address the issue with the finger) and, at least, an antibiotic cream for the back, but he cynically scoffed at me, proposing some tests in a private laboratory or clinic, and, when I said that I am not able to pay, demonstratively expelled me from the room.


The radiologic report ("focal bony lesion or soft tissue abnormality evident"), which Dr. Roger G. Guy ignored.


The timing was a factor, and, while I was trying to get an appointment with another doctor (who was trying to help), the damage to my finger became permanent.


On October, 6, 2017, visiting my family doctor, I asked him if he can refer me to a specialist concerning the inflamed cyst, but he ignored my request.


In the end of October and in November, 2017, Dr. Wang seemed to be more compassionate, and accepted my more frequent visits on October 26, 2017 (9:00), November, 7, 2017 (9:40), and November, 27 (14:15). She shared with me the diagnosis, prescribed medications, but, concerning the cyst, did nothing.


______________


THIS IS THE END OF THE ORIGINALLY WRITTEN IN 2017 SCRIPT/

THE NEXT PART IS AN ADDITION, WRITTEN IN 2018-2021


______________


CHAPTER 5.


Visiting Dr. Wang on April 9, 2018 (15:45), I raised the question about the cyst again, and was denied any help (again).


While visiting Dr. Viviott on 9 October, 2018 (17:15), I - for the first time - asked Dr. Viviott about the infecting cyst, and she did not respond to my request.


In 2019, I visited clinic LaCite twice (I lost my notes about the precise dates), and both times was refused any medical help concerning the cyst.


On July 27, 2019, Saturday, a heavy and heavily loaded HRV car with 2 passengers inside went on my right foot by its back right wheel. This day, there was a wedding of my younger daughter. But on the same day, before the departure for the wedding (70 km from Montreal (a restaurant in an old watermill of 19-th century) this happened to me in case of improbable combination of circumstances.


When I approached to the car to climb up the seat (having widely opening, until stop, the side rear door), the car suddenly moved forward, having run (by its left rear wheel) on my right foot, and stopped precisely on my foot.


If the wheel just rolled through my foot, it would be not so terrible, and the injuries would be milder.


Any explanation why it was necessary to move the car slightly forward and to stop immediately - does not exist.


Despite my inhuman shout, the driver reacted not instantly, and not too quickly understood what happened, and then got out of the car - to see, where to move the car (forward - or back), to free my leg. So there passed about 3-5 minutes until the wheel moved down from my foot. And it, clear, aggravated the injuries.


The heavy car (HRV) - some kind of jeep - was, besides, with the trunk loaded until the limit by heavy bags (we went to the wedding!).


It is a true miracle that such a heavy car did not crush my foot and did not shatter it into small-sized pieces: in spite of the fact that I was not in some sort of heavy-duty footwear, but in the cheapest semisoft sneakers. But, if to recall - how, in 2007, an equal or even more massive car, roaring by its motor, hit me on maximal starting speed, and I, having flied over the cowl on the other side (having landed on both legs), got off only with severe bruises and vascular injuries of both legs, without having hurt anything else: there is nothing more that should surprise anyone.


Incomprehensibly, how the driver could not note but ignore a widely opened (until stop) side rear door, an opened trunk door, passenger"s absence on the rear seat, the indications of electronics (the DOOR is OPEN!), and, in addition, before his maneuver, he looked back - as though was going to move the car backwards: and, so, he shall see, in principle, that I am standing outside.


It is necessary to add that I was still talking to my daughter, concerning the cardboard box lying on the seat, which did not allow me to sit down immediately (otherwise I would crush the box and everything in it): I asked where to move it away. My question was also directed to the driver (that"s why I spoke French), and it was clear that I did not get into the car, and that my legs are somewhere near the wheels.


If someone else was the driver, it was still possible "to believe" in the incident and his guilt (negligence, etc.). But, in this case, it is just impossible to believe that it could occur. I am absolutely sure that the driver is a good person. It is clear both on his everyday actions, and at the emotional level. He is a very self-controlled and disciplined person. And he is a responsible driver. Everything that he does - he does fundamentally, with responsibility and understanding. He is a technical, rational person, an athlete, with an excellent reaction, response, and attention, and a very good-trained driver. Therefore, it is possible to conclude that there was something bizarre not only considering the incident itself, but in the sense that something incomprehensible has happened to him. And it happened in the presence of the guests from Israel...


When, at finally, the car moved from my foot, I cried that I must be carried to a hospital, but, having removed the footwear and the sock, and seeing that nothing like a fracture or a deadly injury was manifested, I asked to bring ice, bandage, and iodine, and went to my daughter"s wedding, where I played the keyboard for the guests. We stopped by at a drugstore, bought a bandage, ice package and iodine, and on the road I held ice, doing a break every 15 minutes, and then about an hour or more at the hotel room.


Then there was no opportunity to put ice: the wedding ceremony, the meeting of guests, etc.; it was necessary to hobble on the crushed leg all the time. We forgot to buy Tylenol, and it was necessary to smile to the guests, overcoming the pain.


But there was more to come. In 3 days prior to the wedding, an electrical motor scooter nearly flew on me when I stood on the sidewalk at an intersection. The sidewalk"s level in that place is equal with the level of the carriageway, and this motor scooter, turning to the right, cut off an angle directly on the sidewalk, so, that helmets of two men sitting in saddles, having tilted a baking plate by the strong angle, passed somewhere in millimeters from me. I recoiled, and, having stumbled, experienced the knee pain. So - now it was already the second injury.


Around 2 months the right foot was swollen and covered with terrible hematomas; the blood vessels injuries, in addition to the injuries of 2007 car incident, brought another wave of suffering. I could not step of the right foot, and (in the beginning of August, 2019) my older daughter took me to the clinic on Sherbrook East Street, near St.-Denis and Berri.


I was seen by a young and relatively tall (normal completion) white doctor-Quebecer, who refused any medical help and even recommendations. I have addressed to him not only with the foot injury, but also with the (again) inflamed cyst on my back, but he just kicked me out.


JULY, 2014.


Whether it is accidental that in July, 2014 - literally next month after the epic of abscess - dermatological problems on my back - as avalanche - began accumulating? Any new growths - from seborrheal keratosis to eritry - literally scatterings "blossomed" on back skin, since July 14. It is impossible to believe that not the abscess on my back gave an impetus to all these phenomena. This process continued up to the middle of December, 2014, and reflected by photos of the same skin sections (taken in different months), which show - how all new "lesions", "birthmarks", and other pathologies appeared and grew on previously clean areas of the skin.


Approximately since July 15, 2014 the spot on the right hand in the form of a triangle strongly disturbed (an itching, burning, etc.): Infection? Dermatitis (dermatosis)? Eczema?


AUGUST, 2014.


August 18, 2014


Monday evening (August 18, 2014, 22.45), I, with my wife - we went to bring our oldest daughter to a destination. When we drove off from home, we were quickly overtaken by dark "metal" color car without any number table (without the license plate number). The driver built in his car too skillfully and hasty in a row of parked cars for not seeing this as an attempt to prevent me from imprinting by photo camera his vehicle's type, model, etc.


And, nevertheless, I think, it was Ford SE "Focus", with number 457-SAN, which got to the field of my sight on August 17, 2014. The same driver drove another car - Ford "Focus" SE (absolutely same moderate and dark metal color) - with number YZZ-649 (May 28, 2014, 8 a.m.). Therefore, I assume that I deal with the same car with removable numbers. Probably, 2 "true" (original) cars, with both numbers, stood in a garage, or rolled on other streets somewhere at the same time.


In Canada, and especially in Quebec, driving without number table is punished very severely.

Without the license plate number, it is impossible to leave from a garage, having bought a new car.

In other words, this is a very rare phenomenon. Whether it is strange that for the last 4 days (on August 15-18, 2014) cars without number tables, which accompanied my movements and caught my sight, appeared 5 times! And there were cars of different brands: 2-doors Toyota (blue color); Ford jeep ("square shape") of old model with car's brand at the left on its body [it has to be noticed that - during this period of times - I called (in my notes) many big cars "jeeps"]; old Chrysler of red color; Ford Honda Abdur (metal color); and Ford "Focus" - near my home. One more car without number table: it was Dodge Durand of 2013 or 2014 (jeep) of black color, with the driver in a black suit, completely bald or with a big almost bald head, about 55-64 years old. The same car was noted near my home with numbers-letters at the beginning of the registration plate-table number - FFK, or FGV: just like the state security service or police cars. If to assume that all these cars performed the "shadowing", then it is very reasonably to suggest that sending cars without identification after me ensure their anonymity in a way.


On the way back a black jeep car (probably, Ford) with number K73-OZJ attracted my attention.


Relatively far from home I asked my wife to drive home without me, and left our car to walk few km along the Canal Lachine.


When I walked along the canal, a big black (HRV?) car (same form and overall dimensions, as the "jeep" K73-OZJ) drove on the opposite bank of the canal parallel to me with almost my speed, in the same direction. I think that it really was the same K73-OZJ car. This car stopped infinite number of times, and waited "for me" - when I used to disappear away from its range of visibility, and then again made up following me - and so repeated again and again. If it would accompany not me, but some other object, which was moving with my speed, then, in that case, this object shall be in a field of my sight, but nothing similar was seen around.


Near not really wide small bridge through a channel, departing from the main canal to one of old buildings ashore (with internal mooring for yachts), a high guy with a dog of menacing look tried to stop me, intentionally hurrying to appear on the bridge ahead of me. After the automobile-pedestrian bridge via canal, a group of aggressively looking youths called to me from another side of the canal, but they were too far, and I quickly disappeared from that spot.


When I was crossing the principle street, going to a double-exit courtyard, a big black car approached from the street and stopped behind me in such a position that its registration plate table number could not be seen. The driver remained inside. By its form, color, overall dimensions, and all remaining details - it was the same car, which followed me along the canal, and the same as the car with number K73-OZJ. Through some time after arriving home I went out to carry out garbage bags. In a quarter from my home, I noted a suspicious car of silvery color, the same type, as the car, which became familiar on different streets in last 3 days. Around ten minutes I just stood at the corner, watching. As soon as I began approaching the car, its headlights suddenly lit up, and this car drove off like escaping, making such maneuvers, which hindered to photograph it. I managed to note that it was a 4-doors car, probably, Ford or Toyota, with the tail lamps separated "into 2" and with a number plate-table in upper (but not in the lower) part of the rear cowl (trunk).


It also seemed to me that, instead of the registration number, a white piece of paper with lines instead of digits was attached (only similar to digits). As soon as I pulled out my camera to photograph this (going away) car (my previous camera had a strong "zoom"), a police car showed up at the intersection and threateningly stopped against me. Both sudden appearance of police patrol car in itself and its abrupt stop near me looked as intimidation. There are no doubts that the police appeared for warning (preventing) me not to snapshot this metal civil car spy: i.e. not to allow its identification. Wishing not to get into trouble, I had to hid the camera for a back and to thrust it into a pocket. I am not fully sure, but it seems to me that the front board number of this police car (blue digits on white background) was pasted by a sticker. All municipal services protested against the frauds and manipulations of the provincial authorities with the pension funds, and these stickers on police cars (as well as on firefighters', repair services', etc.) flaunt with a circle (Libre Nego - freedom of negotiations).


The board number in the rear of the car was not visible because the car was positioned so, and because there was darker. It is possible that it was also pasted.


I crossed the street, approached to the on-door speakerphone, and asked my wife to look into the window and to read the number of the police car from the window, but - at that very moment - the police car sharply darted off, and, with a scratch of brakes, turned left and dashed away. It gave such an impression that the police officers (sitting there) have solved the course of my thoughts, and disappeared before my spouse managed to approach the window (and while I stood, facing the on-door speakerphone microphone, and could not look in their side).


But, nevertheless, I can tell almost for certain what board number was painted on this police car. On convexity of its cowl and overall dimensions and model, it shall be the same Dodge as the police car 70-47. It belongs to the traffic security unit, and its function is to stop and fine drivers on roads, but someone used the car with such board number for spying on me, and it drew my attention on August 25, 2010 (approximately at 16:07, at the angle of Peel and Rene-Levesque); on April 7, 2013 (08.24, at the entrance on high-speed Decarie Road); on the same day in the evening; on May 11, 2014 (12:48, the opposite end of the city); on August 17, 2014 (14.05, Maisonneuve Street in downtown), etc.


Another police car candidate: it is the patrol car 15-13, which is used for surveillance in recent years more often than all other cars combined together, and not only in my own neighborhood, but also in any other part of the city.


It is necessary to add that a black young guy 20-23 y.o. has loitered about all this time near the front door's entrance of my house continuously speaking on mobile phone, and pretending to be my neighbor. But he lived in none of 6 apartments, and never visited our house, not to mention that I never saw him before. He gave such an impression that he was a part of police "operation", and his task was to study, analyze, systematize, and record my reaction and response to police surveillance.


I assume that this was the same guy, who, being - in the past years - chef of a street gang, ordered his gang to attack me several times around the Old Montreal and the Old Port in different time of the day (not only during the dark period), who changed becoming an adult; the same guy that - together with his accomplices - kicked my bicycle so that I crashed into a pole or a fencing, and chased me on August 3, 2009.


___________


Lev Gunin


THE PUNITIVE HEALTH CARE

[HEALTH CARE AS A REPRESSIVE TOOL]


BOOK 5-5


THE UROLOGICAL DRAMA. PART 5. [August-December 2014]


CONTENT


Chapter 1.

Chapter 2.

Chapter 3.

Chapter 4.

Chapter 6.


__________


* * *


The whole text of the chronological events and medical documents (under the name of "The Punitive Health Care - (Health Care as a Repressive Tool)" is available for examination only on the basis of the following contract between the author and the reader:


I (THE READER) GIVE MY CONSENT THAT, BY CLICKING CORRESPONDING LINKS AND ACCESSING THE TEXT OF "THE PUNITIVE HEALTH CARE", I AUTOMATICALLY AGREE TO THE FOLLOWING PRELIMINARY CONDITIONS [FOR READING]:


-- I am (at least) 18 years old.


1. I (the reader) is undertaking (commit myself) not to distribute the text of "The Punitive Health Care - (Health Care as a Repressive Tool)" - entirely, or in fragments; not to copy medical documents; and not to share the text and images without author' permission.


2. I (the reader) understand that the confidential information, which is contained in this text, cannot be used for any other [than the reading (extraneous; secondary)] purposes and needs, for any researches, essays, stories, etc.


3. I (the reader) commit myself not to sneer at open ticklish personal information (which sharing was induced by circumstances), not to savor any medical, physiological, or anatomic details, and not to use this text as a reason for mockery and persecution.


4. I (the reader) am warned by the author that, except for a number of obviously immoral (by definition) doctors' and medical staff's actions, other decisions and acts described in this "confession" are not subjected to hasty moral assessment because a) only experts can judge finally about their justification and fairness; b) explanations and vindications of other party are necessary. We also do not know to what degree the doctors were under an influence and direct power of police, Ministry of Immigration, and other enforcement agencies, political organizations, groups and persons - with their own ideological, economic, and propaganda interests, - and to what degree this influence impacted on their diagnostic conclusions and assessments of patient's state of health. Many of the documentary confirmed facts incontestably demonstrate that author's ideological stand (who's opposing to younger generation's transformation into zombie-biorobots with mobile phones on shoulders instead of heads; to electronic totalitarianism with its prison-like total video surveillance; and to the tyrannical political censorship) played nearly a major role in enraging the authorities and triggering the persecutions.


5. I (the reader) am warned that the author sees the main cause of the most dramatic (for him) events in the fact that the enforcement agencies and interested persons and groups managed to present him to the medical community as an individual incapable to evaluate his health condition objectively; as a health-consciousan (or hypochondriac); an extremist; a troublemaker; an individual obsessed with panic and alarm patterns; as a person, who is making unreal demands to the system of medical care - concerning his - allegedly - pseudo-maladies and exaggerated gravity of trivial indispositions. This smear campaign of defamation, scurrilous libel, and wicked calumny made impossible receiving an adequate medical care (and sometimes any medical help at all), and led to health undermining, numerous diseases, incidents, and unnecessary sufferings. Doctors also considered difficult to believe in continuous (not connected with each other) illnesses, with an interval of 4-7 days, sometimes rolling at the same time: as tsunami. They refused to believe in these sequences of illnesses' painful course, danger, and significance. This chronicle disproves such a prejudiced opinion, producing an incontestable evidence.


6. I (the reader) am informed that all negative remarks, characteristics, and facts' assessments belong only to the portrayal of criminal groups, extremists, and carriers of anti-humanistic, racist, and totalitarian ideology, but do not contain groundless generalizations and negative assessment of any country, ethnic group, or religion. The author is categorically against dismantling of any of the existing states, and against restrictions of the rights of religious congregations of any faith.


7. I (the reader) am informed that this edition partially presents the previous 2017 edition without any changes, and, thus, may not correspond to later view and opinions.


8. I (the English reader) am informed that some parts of the following English text of "The Punitive Health Care" - were translated from Polish, Russian, or French originals, and may contain primitive language, double interpretation, or puzzled meaning. Such confusing fragments should be compared with their originals in Polish and Russian languages (author's native languages) [2016-2017]; all controversial points must be resolved through such a comparison.


9. In the very last moment of this edition's make-up (April 2023), the author came across a description of so-called Havana-syndrome, and found same symptoms and complications, which he experienced when was attacked by an unknown remote weapon (3 Nov. 2005, 7 Jan. 2013, and 21 June 2016), and developed symptoms of post-microwave irradiation.


_________


CHAPTER 1.


August 13, 2014.


I will highlight that - if I - at once after the abscess surgery - learned that the contagium is pepto-streptococci, I would organize bandagings so that the wound should "breathed" more, and, having seen that the progress is minimum, would demand antibiotics even more persistently. It means that, by delaying my access to the medical data, and by denying antibiotics, follow-ups, etc. - the System and the individuals, who were involved, have subjected me to unhuman tortures.


On June 20, 2014, I went to medical archive of St.-Mary's hospital, and demanded (as QUICKLY as possible) the copies of all documents from ER for June 13, 2014, including the infiltrate's analysis (the microbiology-culture test).


They refused to hand out these documents to me, and demanded to fill out a special form again (the second time!), and to wait for the copies by mail.


However, up to July 10, 2014, no copies arrived.


Seeing that no documents arrived, I had to present myself in the archive again, and, there, I did not find any traces of my first demand (database query). My 1-st fax with the formulary completion, and my 2-nd demand, with the filled-in form: both just disappeared!


They demanded to fill anew the same form, and forced me to wait again.


(See above, the abscess-med-archive1.jpg file).


The requested documents arrived by mail only on August 13, 2014 (in 2 months after the surgical intervention, and almost in 2 months after my 1-st inquiry in the archive!).


The norm is - under the law: no more than 30 days from the date of inquiry giving.


It is interesting to note that, when the documents, finally, arrived, there was no post's stamp on the envelope, nor a date. Whether it means that the letter was brought and thrown in a mailbox by a courier? But then how the courier could get to the entrance, while the door is always "on the lock" for strangers. If the mail carrier has no keys, in that case, the courier had to call - and to hand the envelope to me, but this envelope was thrown in the mailbox. It is obvious that some doubtful (if not illegal) trick was used to "erase" the proof of the date.


From this - it is clear that, being engaged in sabotage of medical documents' delivery in time, they consciously committed additional mischiefs.


So, the epic of abscess threw me under the real torture only because of:

1) the refusal of my family doctor timely referring me to a surgeon, prescribing oral antibiotics, and antimicrobial cream, etc. (see above); (possibly, it was connected to the initiative of Dr. Morris, who, using his influence in medical circles, blocked me an access to antibiotics, to other medications, and to certain doctors and medical procedures);

2) the sabotage of my family doctor's referral (given finally - though with huge delay) to the Clinic of One Day Surgery (St.-Mary's Hospital) - by the secretaries of the above-mentioned clinic;

3) the sabotage of the distribution-issue of the essential medical documents (prescription of antibiotics, prescribed by emergency doctors, antibiotic ointment, referral to CLSC, follow-ups memos, copies of the analyses; and so on) by St.-Mary's Hospital's Emergency Room secretary, and, later, by St.-Mary's administration;

4) the sabotage of the delivery - in time - of the copies of the medical documents from the medical archive of St.-Mary's hospital.


It is impossible even to assume that all these mischiefs could be separate events, not a result of well-coordinated and politically motivated persecutions in medical institutions in the city of Montreal.


August 19, 2014


On August 19 - all of a sudden - recurred dysuria and some other symptoms of the recurrence of the same old problem (by means of which - since January 2001 - bad guys deprived me of normal life and hinder my creativity in music and literature). A smaller surge of recurrence happened at the end of March - beginning of May (2014), and there is no wonder. In the apartment, where is 18-19 degrees Celsius (we never turn on heating), I sat nearly a month barefoot (because of the fracture), walked barefoot on the icy floor and for days held ice (20 minutes, then 15 minutes a break, and so on) on the affected finger of the right leg.


But some remedies of "nonconventional" cure, which I use (with variable success) several years for facilitation of my illnesses, helped by then to get out from both the injury consequences, and UTI recurrence.


This time (in August) I went to such a walk-in clinic, where I am not known yet, but even there the doctor refused to prescribe Cipro.


When I entered next Metro station, the police car 31-6 defiantly slowly passed near by.


Running forward, it is necessary to stress that the same police car (31-6) "grazed" near the Metro station, when I went from the same city area on October 19, 2014.


Interestingly, the same police car 31-6 (August 24, 2014) stood near my daughter's home - though it is not "related" to her area.


August 24, 2014


2 police cars - 70-45 and 31-6 - defiantly slowly escorted me from my home. Then the patrol car 31-6 stood near my oldest daughter's home.


SEPTEMBER, 2014.


September 5, 2014


Black stool. Symptoms of gastric or intestinal bleeding. 3 or 4 days - since September 4 - submaxillary lymph nodes are swollen.


September 9, 2014


During my bicycle ride, in the evening (Sunday September 9, 2014), I noticed that someone scrooge speeds on my bike. It is hard to say how and when it could happen. During last one, or one and a half week, the bicycle stood inside, not on the terrace. (However, once, 1-st time in 2 weeks, we all were absent from the apartment approximately an hour and a half).


Because of fault speeds, I never switch them, and ride on one speed always, though, of course, it requires more efforts to go uphill. When I understood that loose pedals and driving on one of "small sprockets" - is a result of someone's manipulations - I tried to switch speeds on the run, and - during this operation - the chain flew. And, though - of caution - I did it at a small speed (it was already slow because of feeble "pull-rod"), I nearly fell with bicycle, and could be injured. Besides, I drove off already quite far from home and to return on foot, pushing the bicycle beside, especially at night: this perspective was not a pleasant one. Fortunately, I managed - without any instruments, by barehanded - to place the chain into place, and - at the same time - not to be hurt. I was moreover lucky, because my present bicycle has a complex system of chain passing circuit and extremely inconvenient for restoring the chain if it falls. It was necessary to potter with the chain, besides, in the dark.


For me, for a person, who's "not a technician", it was, as they say, a high pilotage.


Whether accidentally on the same day we were disconnected from the educational websites?


Here is my complaint to the Internet service provider.


From Leon (Lev) Gunin,

Inter.net customer,

.......@.........

Dear Inter.Net's Customers' Support!

Today, September 9, 2014, we've

been disconnected from all Montreal

universities' web sites.

All other web sites, like

Facebook, Hotmail, Google, Yahoo,

YouTube, Automotive, La Presse,

Devoir, TVA, TQS, Cragg, etc. -

are working fine. However, when

trying to access any of university

pages (for example, umontreal.ca),

we're receiving identical browser

messages "The connection has

timed out". We used 10 different

browsers with the same unsuccessful

result. We also attempted to

break through to university pages

from 7 different computers, one by

one, using no rooter. A computer

from work and another computer from

university, configured by professionals,

also could not display any web pages

of any of Montreal's university.

Internet connection with

universities must be restored

immediately, as doctorate studies,

scientific research, etc. -

ultimately depend on it.

Yours truly,

Leon (Lev) Gunin

______ ______


CHAPTER 2.


NOVEMBER, 2014.


November 2, 2014


On November 2, 2014 (Sunday), I walked from one of the city's areas - where there is a cemetery with my mother's grave.


At Henry-Bourassa Metro-station, there was no cashier in the cash desk, and the automatic machine of ticket sales did not work either.


Further: the quote from an e-mail of that period:


"I've reached on foot the next Metro station: Sauvé. Everything repeated there as well, with only the difference that no tickets' automats are installed there. [By the rules - if there is no one in the tickets' cash desk, the cashier is obliged to leave the pass (next to cash window) open-free, but it was closed.]"


"So, I went to the bus. I was lucky: here the bus in my side just turned up. But I did not manage to get up on the steps yet as 2 police officers have shown up behind me - and started to interrogate me: where I go, for what purpose, etc. They forced me out to the street (good that I did not manage to buy a ticket yet, otherwise my money - 3 dollars - would say "bye-bye"), and began to interrogate me outside. The bus - meanwhile - departed. Then they left the scene in police car with board number 31-6. I trudged to Crémazie Metro station".


"There the whole story has repeated. I was lucky again - there was a bus, and I, finally, came to next Metro station (I think, it was Rosemont), where, certainly, wanted to enter with the same ticket that I bought on the bus. But - before the escalator - the automatic barrier did not let me to pass: when I inserted the ticket, an "error" message was highlighted on the display in French. And, again, there was no one in the cash desk - again...


"Nothing else remained but to trudge to a next Metro (I already was walking approximately 6 kilometers, and wasted lot of time)".


"When I entered the next Metro station, the same police car - 31-6 - defiantly and demonstratively slowly passed by. The same car "grazed" near the Metro when I went from the same area on October 19, 2014".


"Interestingly, as on August 24, 2014: the same police car (31-6) stood near my daughter's home, though the police station 31 is in the opposite corner of the city".


"In the "last" Metro station a cashier (from whom I bought the ticket) sat in the cash desk. But, when I put this new ticket into the ticket "wicket"-cut, the automatic machine spat it out! And this was just a newly bought ticket!"


"I returned to the cash desk for explanations. The cashier took away the "defective" ticket - and gave me a new one. Then I showed her the ticket from the bus, which automatic machines also "began to eat".


"She took it away, too, having returned the money. Someone could catch my fingerprints easily".


"I do not doubt that not the tickets, but the spying video cameras are the reason of what happened. Those, who control the cameras, have the "remote controllers" for all electronics, including throughput automatic machines. Electronics in the Metro are operated not by Metro employees, who only execute the basic functions. If someone wanted to block the passage to someone: it is only necessary for this purpose "to look in a hole" and "to press a button".


"Even worse the fact that this is not an isolated case... They practice such provocations several weeks..."


November, 3-8.


Since November 3, 2014 (precisely on my birthday) - a new UTI recurrence.


Was it accidentally that the current recurrence (of the same 2001 UTI infection) which time already began on my birthday? Originally, starting on 1 January 2001 (1-st Day of Millennium, 1-st day of year), it recurs in most cases on "red" dates of holidays or birthdays.


Knowing and remembering - what fight goes every time for the right to receive antibiotics (and also that almost all laboratory analyses in periods of recurrences are not complete, not proceeded in time, or forged, or (very often) disappear), I did not rash for booking an emergency appointment with Dr. Morris (the urologist, a routine appointment with whom was scheduled for November 25).


Instead, I decided to fight this next UTI by my own conventional methods.


Whether accidentally - during this period - the presence of police and patrol cars at key points of my way through the city has intensified? The peak of the police intimidation in 2014 fell on May, when not only massive, demonstrative and persuasive shadowing was observed, but they called me twice from the police cars, and twice I was stopped and interrogated by police.


From June to September, 2014, police demonstratively (in a bullying manner) showed itself only if I used to make an unexpected move - a breakthrough - from my own neighborhood to another area, trying to remain unnoticed, or - for a long time - dropped out of tracking cameras', police, routine patrols' in civil clothes (as well as police, combing the streets) and informers' sight. Since my birthday (whether it was accidental?), the intensive "following" by police was resumed.


November 11, 2014.


(Excerpt from a letter to one of friends):


"On Tuesday, November 11, 2014, my oldest daughter - in her own apartment! - has fractured a toe. I will remind: on March 3, 2014, the same happened to me, when - in my own apartment! - a wooden plate for cutting vegetables unexpectedly fell down to my foot, and a toe was broken.


In 2 weeks before this, 3 of my close friends-activists (an anti-Zionist, a "pro-privacy" dissident (who's agitating against the spying cameras) and a critic of the predatory banks...) suffered serious injuries in their own homes.


On October 27 and 29, and on November 1 - I got annoying injuries, and all of them: in my home:


1) stroke a blow at my head so that a cone on the top appeared, which (not excluded) will remain forever (it could be something rather serious, but I did not turn to Emergency - it is useless);

2) got a bruise of the left foot and the left hand;

3) got injured the right knee.


Until the end of November, the knee injury has disturbed me most of all.


The Canadian-American movie "The Collector" offers all explanations...


Last Sunday, we were pressed to the roadside on the highway by a rental white Honda Civic, in which a lady sat, by all signs - a typical Israeli. This Honda - was from the "Jewish" distribution company that in the Jewish ghetto on the joint Cote St.-Luke and Hamsted "intersection". Some millimeters divided us from a crash. If someone else drove our car, not my wife (she drives like a real racer; she's behind the steering wheel almost since 6 years-old age: her father was an auto-technical school teacher) - this could end by an accident. Not so long ago (in November), a rental electrical "mini" (car) that is taken often by my daughter on subscription, was hit by other car in the parking lot. It happened 6 hours after my daughter left the mini-car, i.e. handed it over. But go and prove it then!"


(the end of the fragment)


From 11 to 25 of November: it developed a reddening around my right eye; the inflammation of both eyelids; burning and lachrymation.


I paid a visit to 2 walk-in clinics. In both of the clinics, they refused me a referral to ophthalmologist and any medications. The 2-nd ("a better") clinic only advised to "wash the eyes by s feeble solution of tea". (Running forward: probably, if they did not refuse me a referral to ophthalmologist, it would be diagnosed a closed-angle syndrome (and potential glaucoma) before it destroyed the optical nerve and led to a serious eye disease).


Washing eyes by a weakened extract from the tea bags did not help.


I was forced "to get" anti-inflammatory drops and antibiotic eye cream through acquaintances. However, it was, probably, too late, and time was already lost.


Since November 11, 2014, a neogenic cyst, on an old scar on the foot crown was noticed.


See below: cyst on an old scar of the top side of the foot; since November 11, 2014.


Then, since November 11, 2014 - an aggressive folliculitis on the right hand and breast:


See below - Folliculitis on the right hand; since November 11, 2014.


Folliculitis on the right hand; since November 11, 2014.


November, 18-19.


Since November 18, 2014: strange cough, hemorrhagic rash inside feet and slightly higher; sharp aggravation of capillaries' augmentation symptoms; hematuria and so forth "haemo", including 2 nasal bleedings; intestines and kidneys pain; sudden sharp weakness (from time to time); fever - as in case of cold; etc.


I assumed immunoglobulin-A Vasculitis provoked by new enterococci UTI, and, probably, other infections (or other autoimmune responses) - connected to urological problems.


Though the immunoglobulin-A Vasculitis was not confirmed later (though - who knows?..), the general path of my suggestions was confirmed in the coming months and years; and not accidentally I asked my family doctor and other doctors (the urologist - Dr. Morris; immunologist - Dr. Semret (even earlier, before this crisis; and 6 doctors in walk-in clinics); otolaryngologist, Dr. Sejean): to channelize me to a specialist-hematologist, which I motivated by the risk of immunological response to systematic infections, which are capable to provoke dangerous impacts on the hemopoiesis mechanism. Despite my demand, no doctor referred me to a hematologist.


Probably, fall 2014, in 2015 and the beginning of 2016 was not late yet, and the hematologist's intervention with purpose of the appropriate treatment still could prevent and stop these effects, and the failure in the direction to the hematologist the doctors consciously launched one more time bomb in my organism. About further events the talk will go during their serial chronological presentation. Blood tests on November 27, 2014, and on December 8, 2014, showed jumps on all components - in comparison with my last blood tests. Such sudden significant changes assume a dangerous autoimmune response by definition.


Acute breast folliculitis; since November 20, 2014.


By November 24-th, 2014, this folliculitis began to represent just another serious problem. It was already an avalanche of absolutely different problems - from hematuria, cardiovascular, dermatological, to rheumatologic, autoimmune, etc.: which reached an apogee somewhere on November 24-25, 2014.


From November 23 to November 27, 2014: sharp and dramatic worsening of the situation with capillaries and veins of the lower limbs. In my eyes - this pattern was indeed terrible. (As in a 85-year-old aged man!).


Here is how the left foot looked on November 27, 2014. (See below). [A dorsal view down to the foot sole, and from left to right - from heel to fingers.]


See above: foot capillaries major - sharp and sudden - degradation (in few months: completely reversed and disappeared!).


To compare, see (below) how the same food looked in 2011-2014 (till August 2014):


See above: no degraded capillaries, no visible cardio-vascular pattern! Few months later, approximately, in spring, 2015, the same foot - again - looked like this.


And the fact that (beginning - approximately since January 15, 2014) - the net of capillaries began to turn pale, becoming almost invisible; red "plaques" - to disappear, and veins "hid": says (as well as other signs) that some temporarily abnormal pathology took place.


For comparison, I present a photo of the same L. Foot after this spontaneous healing of the capillaries (see this photo below).


If (in addition) we compare this photo with one taken in May 2011, and repeated here (where - neither - visible nets of capillaries, nor plaques, nor veins were noticeable): we can fully realize - with all completeness - the dramatic and sudden degradation of the blood vessels in November 2014.


Since May 2011, till November 2014, the situation remained the same, as well as reflected by the provided picture. It is a pity that the visualization reduces the difference of illuminance and quality a little, but the knowers will understand.


..............


Since November 25, 2014: pain and burning in the right eye; the eye "itched" and burned

incredibly... This eye was red as though inflamed.


It was impossible to get an appointment with an ophthalmologist.


I went to the St.-Mary's hospital's Eye Clinic trying to obtain an appointment with just any ophthalmologist.


On my requests to see a doctor and on my words that I shall be registered in this clinic and they shall have my medical file, the secretary answered that they "have no data" on me "in the system", and that she cannot allow me to see a doctor without a referral. But, when I asked - as well - how it is possible for someone "to get" a referral, everything that I heard in reply: was silence.


Having recalled that I once got to this clinic through the emergency department of the same hospital after the vitreous body detachment, I - after all - did not go to ER: because of the systematic mockeries and innumerous refusals of any medical care in various health emergency situations. This has created a psychological barrier.


[Later I received several evidences that I am persona non grata in St.-Mary's Ophthalmological Clinic.]


I remembered very good how - when having the vitreous body detachment and borderline IOP - I got a referral to this Eye Clinic "with a fight", but achieved nothing, because the eyes exam by ophthalmologist terminated fruitlessly: no treatment, no recommendations, no medical report, no prevention of further degradation of my vision and further worsening of eyes' disease, no follow ups, and no diagnosis. If - even by then - I did not receive any help from the ophthalmologist, all the more now, in case of such a "small" problem as itching and reddening in the right eye, they will kick me out home for sure, and I will only suffer in vain in ER waiting room 4-5 or all 10-12 hours.


It was necessary to wash the eye with feeble solution of tea and camomile infusion.


By December 6-th, 2014, the inflammation (or what it was) - began to ease.


These (listed above) are only some examples of the numerous dermatological, gastroenterological, urological, cardiovascular, ophthalmologic, rheumatologic, and other problems, which were left untreated by doctors, and which manifested themselves simultaneously since November 11, 2014, and were accruing up to November 25, 2014.


Below, there is an additional list of some other multiple dermatological, gastroenterological, urological, cardiovascular, ophthalmologic, rheumatologic, and other problems, which appeared in the end of November and in December, 2014 (and in the beginning of 2015) - "in addition" to already listed:


ulcers in the oral cavity;

hemorrhagic rash;

intestinal or gastric bleeding;

(again) hematuria;

intestines pains,

sudden elbow and knees pains;

strange cough;

pains in kidneys (in a combination with fever and strong weakness);

sharp aggravation of capillaries' degradation symptoms;

sudden and massive grow of gray hair (later this process noticeably went back (reversed), which already manifested in itself something very unusual, and specifies some abnormal pathological phenomena);

sharp rise of aging and age infirmity (this process went also reverse after a while).


All this is "classically" laid down in a pattern of an expected complication from an exposure to a new microwave irradiation, either intoxication, or serious infection.


Having contacted (concerning another (of innumerous) urological infection) my family doctor, and the urologist, Dr. Morris, and having received (from them) a bold refusal of my request to administrate wider diagnostic procedures and antibiotics, in November I, probably, faced (because of their refusal) first wave of a dangerous autoimmune response, which triggered all above-mentioned problems. It is obvious that there was a systemic health failure, and the outputs about its reasons arise by themselves.


Since November 18, 2014: strange intestines pains, sudden elbow and knees pains, inexplicable (light) cough, kidney pains (in a combination with fever and the strong weakness), pruritic hemorrhagic rash on the feet interior (since November 24), sharp aggravation of capillaries' degradation symptoms, hematuria and a hematoschezia.


Approximately, since November 18, 2014, microhematuria has reemerged (again), being confirmed by the lab tests.


Since January 2015, the lab analyses did not show it.


The last lab test in October 2014, did not show it, too; so, all this points to a particular period of time.


And here - again. Every time haematuria and gematos. disappears after a course of antibiotics of broad spectrum - such as Protrin.


The fact that the bleedings in the form of bloody discharges, with abundant bright red (fresh), or brown ("old") blood with the "baked pieces" (blood clots) - also began: is even more disturbing.


It never was like this.


The right eye became scratchy and watery again, which is a symptom of an infection as well.


I will repeat that the joints began to hurt very suddenly: knees, elbows...


Other symptoms: strange (light) cough: very short-time - 5-10 minutes - 1-2 times a day; intestines' pains; strange feelings in kidneys, followed by fever, weakness, phenomenon of "feeling sick"; fever "separately" from unpleasant feelings in kidneys; sudden weakness.


On November 19, 2014, all my "tags" in the apartment were once again torn down.


I found in the computer, which is never connected to Network - traces of connection to Internet (in the cache). Besides, something was sent from this computer... from my own email post box. For the second time, the same occurred on December 3, 2014, when I was not at home (I was visiting a doctor, and no one was at home).


Again traces of connection to Internet in system files.


Approximately, since November 19, 2014 - the tonometer showed 136 upper, and 91 lower blood pressure.


CHAPTER 3.


NOVEMBER 20, 2014.


On the 20-th of November - health problems have aggravated again, numerous and not connected one with another (which could not be explained from the medical point of view only).


Since the 20-th of November, the blood pressure began to jump up to 150 and above (the "upper"). Up to this time, the blood pressure kept normal for many and many months. I measured it 3 times a day. It was usually 120 x 80 (or x 85), sometimes (very rarely, most common - by the evenings) the upper blood pressure has reached 130, the lower - up to 90. The pulse was always around 58 or 60.


By the same time, a spot on the right hand (later defined as a seborrheal keratosis (but such diagnosis, as a rule, is subject often to audit) appeared. At first, a "triangle" of microscopic pimples, which were sitting in its angles, has formed on this spot's site. The spot had a red "rim", pink color in the middle, and 3 hardly noticeable miniscule acnes in the angles. To the touch, the spot (the stain) became hardish. Then the spot disappeared, but appeared again later. [Jumping forwards: later it disappeared completely.]


Approximately, from November 20 to November 24, 2014, a cyst on one of sinews on top of the left foot has formed. This cyst or a tumor is precisely on crossing of a sinew with the very old scar from a serious knife wound. (The nerve and a sinew were also cut by then). (Running forward: this cyst has disappeared 1 year later).


NOVEMBER 24, 2014.


Since November 24, 2014: a rash appeared on the feet interior - similar to diathesis. (Not follicles, for sure).


Here (on this photo) is this hemorrhagic rash (since November 24, 2014). The view is diagonal ("from left to right - up"), to an internal stone of foot.


The hemorrhagic rash is a natural logical "completion" of a pathological autoimmune process called by the denial of antibiotics by doctors, whose duty was to treat new urological infection, a possibly repeated (such, as at the beginning of January, 2014) microwave radiation's effects, either poisoning, or all together (see another photo):


Hemorrhagic rash (the view from above to the inside foot stone) (since 24 Nov. 2014).


Benadryl did not help, and from this, I drew a conclusion that it is a hemorrhagic rash.


It is already an alarm pointing to some problems with blood coagulation, veins as such, "immunoglobulin", thrombocytes, etc.


Next photos display:


The hydrocortisone, which was prescribed in a walk-in clinic concerning the hemorrhagic rash (causing besides, a terrible itch) on November 26, 2014.


The card on a rendezvous with Dr. Morris for November 25, 2014.


The requisition for blood test, written out by Dr. Morris on November 25, 2014. Whether it is strange that the UROLOGIST "forgot" to include (to mark) also a urine test - especially as I reported miсrohematuria, next "long-playing" urological infection, and suspected urecemia (i.e. it was necessary to check the level of uric acid not only in blood) - in connection with simultaneous (as a rule) attacks of urological infections and arthritis. Dr. Morris also knew about the micro-hematuria from his office test by special paper-strip.


A fragment from the fax sent to Dr. Morris in November, 2014. Whether it was obvious - on symptoms, - that we deal if not with IS-vaskulit, then with some other autoimmune reaction? Perhaps, not late was to appoint a course of antibiotics - and then there would be neither sharp increase of dangerous autoimmune reaction, nor vascular problems, nor a further complication of urological aggravations, nor arthritis?


On November 24, I bought at drugstore's cash counter a tube of 10 percent hydrocortisone (only one that can be acquired without prescription).


The area of rash - after use of several medications - began to decrease, but in 2 next days the progress was not so hot.


NOVEMBER 25, 2014.


On November 25, 2014 - bleeding: intestinal or gastric, with bright, red blood.


It - on symptoms - happens in case of hemorrhoids, but in case of the absence of hemorrhoids: serious alarm No. 1.


Besides, I just sat at the computer (i.e.: the bleeding was spontaneous, arose "in itself". It was not followed by any pain.


Approximately, since November 18, 2014 (after almost an annual absence) - micro-hematuria again, and then hematuria.


The last urine lab test in October, 2014, did not show it, as well as the tests in Dr. Morris's office (tests of "litmus" pieces of paper), in exception of the "litmus" paper-strip at Dr. Morris's office on 25 Nov. 2014, when it indicated micro-hematuria, and when Dr. Morris lied to me, saying that he is sending me for blood-urine test, but in the requisition has marked ONLY blood test solely.


And here - again. Hematuria and gematos. always used to disappear after a course of broad spectrum antibiotics - such as Protrin. Now, it was even more disturbing that there were bleedings in the form of bloody discharges, with abundant bright red (fresh) or brown ("old") blood with some "baked pieces" (strange blood clots), as never happened before.


Few weeks the right eye scratched and watered, which are also symptoms of infection.


I will repeat other symptoms, which are (already listed above):

a) sudden joint pains (elbows and knees);

b) strange light cough (short-time - 5-10 minutes - 1-2 times a day);

c) intestines' pains;

d) "sick sensation" in kidneys, followed by fever, weakness;

e) also - fever ("separately" (without) unpleasant feelings in kidneys);

f) sudden weakness.


Besides, it was an infection in the form of a spot on the skin of the right hand (since November 25, 2014).


Let's return to the latest events.


What perspectives did I have if it was indeed an immunoglobulin-A vasculitis?


Normally, it happens mostly in children, and much more rare in adults. In adults, it develops in a much more severe form.


And, than a person is older, its effects are more serious.


It is considered that the most dangerous age, in which the immunoglobulin-A vasculitis is most devastating - after 45. And I am already 60.


In case of this disease, in that part of kidneys - where there are glomerical fabrics filtering blood - can be formed deposits of proteins, crystallization or calcification, "hypertrophied" cells, abnormal cells in the filtering area - and in all transit fabrics (i.e. the epithelium covering kidneys, ureters, urinary bladder, etc.).


The blood vessels of kidneys, or the veins passing through prostate, etc. - can be "touched".


But this disease does not develop "just like that", and represents an autoimmune response to any given "strange" infection.


This "invisible" infection can appear not less (and even more) artful than the immunoglobulin-A vasculitis (which in itself - if for the first time - quite often passes without complications).


If such an autoimmune response already repeated several times - it is a signal of BIG danger.


On the same day, on Tuesday, November 25, 2014 (after a loss of several computer files, I was not successful in restoring an exact chronology up to the end), I got to urologist, Dr. Brian Morris. Microhematuria was confirmed [the pr. is normal NOW (allegedly].


I handed over (to Dr. Morris) a list of the components of laboratory tests, which I would like to check: PSA, cancer blood test, antibodies (irregular proteins), creatinine, hematuria, etc. He refused to listen, justifying this refusal as his reaction to "complains, not connected to his "profile", but, on the contrary, my demands were very well connected to urology. He actually "kicked me out" from his office without providing any medical help, despite a number of serious pathologies: from massive hematuria - to obvious signs of infection. Though the spontaneous hematoshcezia happened right before my visit to him, he, wiping his hands - massively smeared with blood - did not even take care to investigate and examine, what's going on, and just boldly ignored all my concerns, explanations, complains, and requests. He demonstratively has shown his unwillingness to comment somehow what he seen and heard.


In the end of November 2014, I paid visits to other 2 specialists. However, both specialists, whom I visited in the 20-s dates of November 2014, refused to listen to "not related" (allegedly, "not connected to their profile") "complaints", though they could and shall consider them as the important symptoms giving answers to many questions.


Though the Immunoglobulin-A-Vasculitis officially was not confirmed later (but - who knows?..), the general venue of my suggestions in the coming months and years was confirmed. Not without reasons I asked my family doctor - and other doctors (whom I visited: (Dr. Morris (urologist); Dr. Semret (immunologist) (earlier, even before crisis); and 6 doctors in walk-in clinics; later - Dr. Sejean (otolaryngologist): to refer me to a specialist hematologist. I motivated that request by the permanent risk, which poses systematic urological infections by provoking harsh immunological response, which, in turn, is capable to provoke dangerous impacts on the hemopoiesis mechanism.


In the 20-s of November 2014, several additional health problems appeared, thus - numerous and not connected one with another.


In principle, all indispositions and diseases for a while sharply stopped since February 2014 (vanished as if by magic!), against the background of (a month later) toe fracture in March, and surgery of the abscess draining in May (then - 4 months (!) - postoperative wound did not heal and suppurated (up to the end of August, 2014), accompanied by complete and outraged refusal of medical help by the doctors. Even medical bandaging in policlinics had to be won with fight, but my wife got skilled to do it better than nurses did, so, very soon their help was not necessary any more at all.


The broken toe hurt up to August 2014.


It seems that it was not simply fractured, but shattered, which is indirectly confirmed also by the medical imaging done on June 2, 2014. At the same time, pains in the neighbor toe also disturbed, and it was clarified later that there was a fracture as well. But the doctor on duty in St.-Mary's Emergency Room (when I arrived to ER with a fracture) not only sent me home without having rendered any help and having thrown through clenched teeth "it will heal by itself", but also refused to show me to a surgeon. She "missed" (or ignored) a fracture of the neighbor toe. And this apart from the fact that, in case of almost total absences of other patients and in case of nearly 0 hard cases, they forced me to wait in the waiting room near 6 or 8 hours.


Interestingly - not the 1-st time - nothing at all disturbs against the background of injuries. If it was a psychotherapeutic effect, then such period of "calm" would come soon after each injury, or - at least - at the same time. However, such "calm" periods (when only an injury remains a health problem) start EARLIER (happens, in weeks, and even for 1-2 months prior to an injury or something similar).


It is like though health problems go like waves, and each wave brings the whole set of infections, injuries and stresses. So a radio-controlled model works, which is turned on into an active phase only when someone needs it.


There is one more feature: suddenness. As a rule, normally diseases (if it is not an acute appendicitis, not a heart attack, not a stroke, not a pyelonephritis) accrue gradually and against the background of oscillations into one or an opposite side, but not in my case.


Besides, normally any sharp aggravation of health degradation is preceded by symptoms, on which it is possible to predict exasperation of cardiovascular problems, arthritis, or something else. But, again: not in my case.


In that case, there shall be some external factor: radiation by radio waves and other waves of dangerous frequency; intended infection or poisoning; chronic stress caused by external reasons (like police intimidation, political persecutions); staged intentions causing injuries and mutilations.


One can guess that the bureaucrats and specially affiliated with the government doctors were judging in the same way, coming to the same conclusions, and from here come the cover ups and sabotage of medical exams and reports of the lab tests; closure of the access to antibiotics, anti-inflammatory, etc. Doctors and medical clerks, who literally smelled something suspicious about externally inflicted injuries to my health (at least - some of them), suspected government's involvement, and, on their own initiative, were conducting cover-ups, consciously destroying my health.


Such surface explanation of my ordeals inevitably would come on mind to any other person - on my place. But - in reality - occurrences and events are much more complex, and the "simplest" and "logical" explanations not always are the most correct.


One of the most complicated probable scenarios: is the periodicity of the action of a pattern of repressive persecutions of dissidents: the periodicity that is launching the mechanism of psychological discomfort, which, in turn, is triggering victim's health failures, and, in my case, strengthened by dangerous chronic and persistent urologic infection and its inadequate treatment by doctors that promoting accumulation of problems in my body to a "breakdown point".


On the other hand, I am against the mind stagnancy of thinking and false shame or fear of accusations of "conspiracy theories", "maniacal suspiciousness", etc.; and I am open for any THEORETICAL version of any events, except frankly idiotic.


And, because a version of the repeated (4-5 times) usage of microwave radiations is inscribed into the general trend of technologies' transformation (which could turn life of people into paradise on Earth) - to the gradually strengthening "hell on Earth" [simultaneously inscribed into an outline of incidents with me personally], I will not rash to refuse to include it in a row of other versions.


As for probable radiation (it is not excluded) - by radio waves of unhealthy frequency: the following odd thing can point to such a scenario.


Approximately since January 1, 2014 (and just on January 7, 2013 - occurred an inexplicable vertigo, combined with vomiting, fever, t almost 40 C, high leucocytes, etc.), in some hours or days the air (not cable) TV channels - received to the room (not "cable-satellite") antenna - began to disappear completely.


You turn on the TV in "non-cable" mode: and ANY of ALL air channels does not work!


Such TV stations as the central Canadian television CBC in English and French, or such as CTV, TVA, GLOBAL - any TV set shall receive (in my neighborhood, on the 3-rd floor) generally without any antenna, and I installed an "advanced" indoor antenna with signals' booster, in addition to connected to a separate stationary amplifier. 12 TV canals were always available for years, and, in January, 2013, suddenly began to disappear. With no big new constructions sites, which could obscure the signals, with no other changes of the environment, this is just inexplicable. And it means that something suppresses off-the-air signals.


Other strange thing was a spontaneous (?) turning on of the bulbs, which are built in a bookcase. If to exclude "uninvited guests", who are making the way at night to the apartment and turning on the light in a bookcase, whether it is impossible to assume that this phenomenon is obliged its existence to waves of unusual frequency (or an electricity cause)?


Since May 14, 2014 (after the surgical operation of opening and cleaning the abscess) - up to the end of November (to the 20th), i.e. nearly 7 months (!): almost nothing disturbed me (of course, "nothing" - comparing to the previous period!). And suddenly - as though a collapse or a tsunami... Suddenly a problem with the blood vessels materialized. Capillaries began to pope out, which was followed by micro-hemorrhages. These phenomena was seen on the interior of feet; and in the areas, always hidden by clothes. Then (in the 20-s of November) the blood pressure began to jump up to 150 and above ("upper").


As later became obvious, sometimes pharmacies delivered expired medications, so, many of the episodes may be explained by this. If, approximately to the end of 2011, such a problem (which was very spread in Russia till 2010 (circulation (in the pharmacies) of false, expired, or bogus medications) practically did not exist in Canada on a disturbing scale, starting from 2012, expired medications are given (especially in Quebec) to vulnerable people (like elderly, addicts, new immigrants, very poor folk, psychiatric patients, etc.) not only in old-age nursing homes. If - in the beginning - I thought that this happened only to me, later I heard the same from many people, who received (in the pharmacies) expired medications, or were suspicious about this.


However, this time it was not due to expired medications.


Since February 2014, I did not take blood pressure controlling pills from the pharmacy, but 5 months I was taking same pills that I got via Internet.


At the end of 2013, the blood pressure became permanently decreased (lower than the norm), and later (in 2014), when it fell to 80 or 90 x 60 (or even 55), I decided to stop temporarily the intake generally.


If I am correct, I stopped taking the pills somewhere in June or August 2014.


Approximately, since November 19, 2014, the tonometer showed 136 upper, and 91 lower. In the next days, the upper index reached 140, against the background of all of the amplifying problems with blood vessels. I made a decision to resume the intake of the tablets, starting with reduced doses and gradually bringing a dose to the former one (which is minimal already).


By the same time, a spot on the right hand (later defined as a seborrhea keratosis (but such diagnosis, as a rule, is subject often to audit) appeared. At first, a "triangle" of microscopic pimples, which were sitting in its angles, has formed on this spot's site. The spot had a red "rim", pink color in the middle, and 3 hardly noticeable miniscule acnes in the angles. To the touch, the spot (the stain) became hardish. Then the spot disappeared, but appeared again later. [Running forwards: later it disappeared completely.]


On November 24, 2014, a feet rash, similar to diathesis, suddenly appeared. Benedril did not help, so, from here I drew a conclusion that it is, probably, a hemorrhagic rash.


In other words, it is already an alarm, which suggests something serious with blood coagulation - or with blood vessels as such, or with immunoglobulin. At the same time sparked skin folliculitis, which was for the first time shown about one and half (2?) years ago, since January or February 2014, disappeared, too.


Approximately, from November 20 to November 24, 2014, a cyst appeared on one of sinews of top of the left foot. This cyst or a tumor was located precisely on crossing of very old scar from serious knife wound and a sinew. (The nerve and a sinew were also cut by then).


One cyst on one of very old scars developed on the forehead (right side) in 2002 or 2003. At first, something was outlined like a "long-playing" abscess or a furuncle there, at the same time. I addressed to 2 doctors, and they told that it is "nothing, and will disappear by itself ". Then (when the cyst was formed already) I visited a surgeon (with a referral from Dr. Sigmund Zast) in the walk-in clinic in a loft on Van Horn Street, beside the Plamandon Metro Station, and demanded to remove it. The surgeon - at first - tried to frighten me by a supposed "strongly noticeable" scar on the forehead after surgery, and, when I - regardless of his frightening - continued to insist, he said that "nobody" would remove it. Later I visited another surgeon, in the policlinic in the old Royal Victoria hospital: with the same result.


Few months later this cyst calcified, i.e. turned into a bone growth, which disfigured my forehead incomparably worse (considering the cosmetic reasons) than any "reasonable" blemish (and, besides, can be dangerous in some conditions).


The forehead was disfigured by a cone on the right side that is worse than any scar...


Another cyst also developed on an old scar on the spine column. Once, in Minsk, in late 1980-s, in the subway - I was stabbed by a pricker (or a scalpel) in the back - and the attackers run away (there were 2 young persons).


This tiny cyst did not change in sizes approximately from 1993 (from the beginning) and up to 2012: when it suddenly began inflamed-infected, increasing in sizes, and inflammation led to abscesses and furuncles. 17 times (!) I demanded from different doctors to remove this cyst, but they even refused me a referral to a surgeon. (The first time I demanded to remove this cyst even before my arrival to Canada: it was in a country - where we were taken by force from Warsaw, and were they held us - against our will - for more than 3 years).


CHAPTER 4.


NOVEMBER 26, 2014.


On November 26, 2014, at 10 a.m., I came to the walk-in clinic at Montreal downtown, with complaints to internal bleedings, hemorrhagic rash, and joint pain; pain in kidneys in combination with brown urine; cough, and other symptoms of some dangerous autoimmune reaction. I also wanted the doctor to look at the newly formed cyst on a scar from old knife wound on the crown of the left foot.


The medical exam was performed by good and aware doctor, to whom I already got twice.


What struck me is that - if the previous 2 times she talked to me very nicely, - this time (already at the time when I just showed up) she was set up towards me unfriendly (even before I pronounced the 1-st word).


I described the symptoms, and assumed that it is not some separate problems, but a systemic problem, including blood vessels or blood clotting, while stomach ulcer, hemorrhoids, cystitis, etc. are ruled out.


At the same time, I at once emphasized that - presently - I do take neither aspirin, nor other medications affecting blood coagulation. She agreed with me.


The requisition for advanced blood test had to be kicked out with fight, especially on microbiology that allowed to doctors only with big stipulations and when the patient has a heat. But I had no elevated temperature. (When I went to this blood test, I had no choice, but to lie about the temperature - for not to topple the doctor).


Once again, I will emphasize that the tone, in which she spoke with me - struck me. She uttered to me as if I was guilty of something; she interrupted me; she did not allow me to finish a phrase; she did not want to listen - why I came; she said that the PATIENTS are waiting for her (it means, I am not a patient!).


Concerning the old scar: she generally did not dare to examine the cyst (which could be a tumor), and, when I told that I would like in this occasion to get a referral to a surgeon, she said that if "each trifle" is inspected by a surgeon and if "each nonsense" is removed - then the state health care will not have money for carrying out "serious surgeries".


It is very difficult to doubt that she was already "instructed" and "prepared" by somebody, and was stridently made hostile against me. But (in spite of the "instructions") - whether that - in case of such serious problems as internal bleedings and hemorrhagic rash - there were no (or could not be) instructions - she ignored the "councils" (agreeing to administrate medications and lab tests), whether she disregarded the "councils" because she is a good-hearted person, but she acted as a doctor, and not as a conformist. (And - no doubt - she later paid for it).


Running forward, I shall tell that - when I caught a copy of this blood test, - I saw nothing dramatic there. But here is that interestingly. Almost all components of blood test - were on unusual to me (for my body) indexes. They looked as were artificially averaged. Besides, when I caught the copy of this blood test, additional sabotage has opened. (Read about this in the next "report" - for November 27, 2014).


However, this blood test found several very disturbing signs, which could mean nothing for a badly informed person, but not for me: NEVER before there were such kinds of essential aberrations on hematology and other sections, like abnormally low indexes of RDW and MPV, abnormally high indexes of PT and INR, and bilirubin (one of liver function indications, the most important one) - 32 against the norm of 18.


It means that my worries and guesses were completely justified, and that the doctor, who administrated this lab test, was right in her suggestions that my disturbing health conditions are not "imaginary", but real, and that the lab tests are able to give some clues.


Also running forward: when - in the morning on December 11, 2014 - I brought that blood test (the requisition was issued of November 26, 2014) to Dr. Morris, he attacked me nearly with his fists; he began screaming on me - that I supposedly doing "too many" "same" tests; and - thereby - "already robbed the state" on "lump sum".


When I tried to remind that the blood test, which he administrated - and this blood test (26.11.2014, which copy I brought to show him): are 2 DIFFERENT (not identical) blood tests, with the check of DIFFERENT components, he began to shout at me even more aggressively, and said that the cost of a blood test is 500 Canadian dollars, and that, in his judgement, those someone, who "abuse" the free Canadian health care, should be deprived the right for free universal medical care.


In rage, Dr. Morris has tear off apart the peace of paper of this blood test report's printout, but then came round and managed to get himself together, accurately put the paper scraps together, and handed them back to me.


The undeniable connection between the attacks and accusations against me vocalized by Dr. Morris - and the similar accusations stated by immigration officials (including that ugly scene in Montreal Chest Institute) in 1999 - 2001 - is visible, as they say, with the naked eye, without leaving any doubts that Dr. Morris had by then (in 1999 or 2000, or years later) some connections with the Immigration authorities, or had an access to my immigration file. Anyway, there no doubts that his attitude towards me was extremely politized and based on his ideologically motivated personal views from the very beginning.


When - in January, 2015 (i.e. not more than a month later) - I once again was in the same walk-in clinic (and asked to be examined by the same doctor (I called her surname) [that has examined me (and issued a requisition for the blood test) on December 26, 2014] - I was told that she does not work in this clinic any more. Then, when I asked - why she left the clinic, and where she works now (because, I added, she is a very knowledgeable and compassionate doctor): at first, they "were rumpled", and then nevertheless responded that she generally left Montreal.


From this, I drew a conclusion that Dr. Morris, having seen her surname in the printout of the blood test (which I showed him on December 11, 2014 (or he got into my medical file later -to verify her surname?), denounced her to some administrative medical instances and broke her life and career forever.


This case, probably, gained fame in medical circles in Montreal, because - right after this conflict with Dr. Morris - I began to face even bigger discrimination, prosecutions, and mockeries in medical institutions...


Exactly that time - on December 11, 2014, when I reminded to doctor Morris that a course of antibiotics would presently be a unique panacea from chronic bleedings and recurrences of urinal infections since 2001, he responded with not hidden anger that "Antibiotics are not allowed for you any more", and my counter question "Because of what, or by whom are not allowed?" - he left without response.


From confidential sources, I know that this doctor - is a member of 1) groups of coordinators - intermediaries - between sponsors of St.-Mary's hospital and its administration; 2) doctors' medical executive committee of the interactive medical program; 3) one more committee of the medical workers; 4) a managing organ of a network system for registering the patients and patients' visits to doctors. Besides, he has his own company, which is managing almost all medical appointments' schedule in Montreal for all doctors. And, I think, that is not all. In other words, this doctor: is a representative of the medical authorities; and, so, not just plays "games of cruelty" because of a pressure put upon him (and because of obligation to support the government's policies), but - apparently - he himself to some extent is defines them.


NOVEMBER 27, 2014.


Having the requisition in hand for blood-urine test from the walk-in clinic (from November, 26, 2014) I went to MGH laboratory next day, November 27, 2014, and, before, photographed the requisition for this test. But I was too agitated (especially after the tone, with which the doctor talked to me), and did not noticed all points marked in the requisition. When later I compared the requisition with the test's report-result - it became clear that, among other components, also, the urine test was checked-marked, but, in the laboratory, they completely sabotaged the urine test.


It was only mentioned (in the test's report's printout) that the urine sample was not received, but it was not specified (as required) - why. Meanwhile, if I would refuse the urine test - this would be specified for sure.


At the moment, when I, after having waited for the queue, came inside the laboratory for registration, an elderly woman sat down on the 1-st chair for patients (1-st of 3 seats facing 3 registration bureaus), but she was ordered to stand up - for some reasons - and to move herself into another chair, and - on her place - they put me, though - according to the logic of things - I shall sit down on the 2-nd sitting, facing the next registration nurse.


It at once has not pleased me. I immediately felt that something fishy is going on, a sort of a vicious provocation.


The nurse-secretary (registration nurse) - 43 y.o. or older (to whom I got), printed (on computer keypad) by only 2 fingers suspiciously slowly, constantly asking her neighbor such questions as "where is a colon?", or "how to print a number?".


I began to protest right away, demanding to be transferred to another registration nurse, but nobody listened to me.


This registration nurse did not know (or pretended that does not know) absolutely anything: what means this, what means that. The most amazing: when I explained to her that this check mark means the indication on urinalysis (microorganisms' culture), she did not know that neither what is "microorganisms or bacterium" ("culture") nor what is "microbiology" generally.


I had legal concerns that the components of the blood test (assigned in the requisition) - will not be marked in the computer properly and will not be studied. I demanded the supervisor.


That woman has showed herself (a stout low woman with short arms-"handles", lower than the registration nurse) - and immediately escaped.


I stayed on this check in (on this simple procedure (which normally takes 1-2 minutes!) - more than an hour (!).


During this time, dozens of patients (on the neighbor chairs) have passed this procedure, went to the blood collection units, and were replaced by other patients.


Who - on my place - would not suspect that it was a set up?


And, if one of the theoretical assumptions tells that it was artificially arranged for "leading me out" from medical institutions and for discouraging me from any requests of any complex and more expensive lab analyses, - another probability assumes that this provocation could signify something much more serious.


The goal of this whole theatric performance could be - in passing - to fool me and to mock me with the purpose to force me to forget about the second component of the test (the urine test), so, that I should not ask about it.


If someone really staged this farce, this person - probably - did not know exactly whether I am aware about both of the tests (blood and urine), mentioned in the requisition.


From the medical point of view, it was, probably, calculated that the indexes of both tests (blood and urine) by themselves, or in combination - will become an indication for medical treatment or for an advance preliminary treatment (diagnostics), and it was not wanted to be allowed.


This deliberate sabotage could generally ruin me, or - at least - could cause a heavier damage to my health (than already did), having provoked (without treatment) a chain reaction to dangerous autoimmune response, up to death or disability.


And such plan could be ruined - if both test's components (blood and urine - that were specified in the requisition (or 1 of them) - would reveal serious problems.


Of course, they could allow to hand over a sample for the test, but then it should be destroyed or replaced (by a fake one) in the database whereas not to allow a sample to emerge is more simple and convenient.


On November 27, 2014, the blood sample was taken from the bend of the left elbow - and this elbow began to hurt already on November 28 insufferably as at any joint never hurt.


It is hard to say what medical or other dependence could be between the first - and the second.


Later I recalled that this particular elbow was struck when I was hit by the car in the fall of 2007; that I struck this elbow in the Underground City - when was walking with Yu. and his son, Dmitry, in April, 2010; this elbow was struck in the subway by some skinhead approximately on July 17, 2013; this elbow I - being by bicycle - struck in a handrail of the barrier of the Lachine canal port near the gateways at Seigniors Street (when some strapper intentionally-bluntly went directly on me sideways a forehead, and nothing stayed, but to turn sharply to the left - and to crash into the balustrade); and, running forward - later this elbow's X-ray showed an accrete (by itself) fracture.


The joint pain began, however, approximately since November 17 or 18, 2014, but, first, in comparison with the left elbow ache after November 27 - it was not pain at all; and, secondly, approximately - by November 25-26 - the pain began to disappear, and I more almost did not feel it.


The comparison of the test's requisition with this test's report showed that some other doctor's requirements were just ignored. For example, the special immunoglobulin-A test - was not done, and this was the most important component!


Why this component was the most important - I explain below.


After an entire hour of the mockery at the registration desk, and the stressful impact of this vicious performance on me, they prepared an additional distressful provocation.


I was moved from one blood collecting nurse to another one, and then, again, to another one. Then, this latter - a male nurse - moved the desk and ordered me to replace with the chair few times, and I did not realized - by then - that it was objectively required according the protocol, concerning a suspected infection. This whole ordeal has unsettled me even more, and I did not react in any way, when a test tube with an accompanying printout for urine test was not delivered for me, as if a urine test was not mentioned in the requisition at all. I realized (remembered) that the urine sample was sabotaged only next day...


Here is the complex lab analysis of blood done in the direction of the doctor from the walk-in clinic. It should be displayed entirely (see the photo below):


The requisition on blood test of November 26, 2014 (see above).

In turn, the analysis was done on November 27, 2014.

Ideally, the specialists shall check the requisition's copy with the copy of test's report: to see whether everything, specified in the requisition, was done.


In this requisition, 7 components were marked:


1) Electrolytic profile.

2) Liver profile.

3) Special immunoglobulin-A test.

4) Hematologic test:

ANA (anti-nuclear antibodies),

complete blood count,

prothrombin,

PTT,

reticulocytes,

sedimentation.

5) Serologic test ASO.

6) Microbiology (microorganisms' in urine culture).

7) Urine test.


Below I list the components, which were sabotaged (not done), by the laboratory.


Blood analysis result (report) on November 27, 2014 (see the number pictures below):


Immunology.

The test for antibodies was left in an incomplete status.

One more note about it will be followed.

Right there - microbiology (bacteriology, or "culture"): after 5 days, growth is absent.


The same is marked on another page, where the "no growth" mark is reported about the urine microbiology culture. In reality, the urine sample was never collected, because they sabotaged it. Thus, the indication of "growth" is a fake.


Blood analysis result on November 27, 2014.

On this page indexes of hematologic blood analyses are printed.

The low index of RDW (Red Cell Distribution) means that the red blood cells (erythrocytes) by the size differ from each other too little. It can occur in such a situation, when their production is lower than a norm, and - as a rule - in that case the overwhelming majority of erythrocytes are larger than usually. It happens in case of macrocyte anemia. In case of macrotsyte anemia, the overwhelming majority of erythrocytes, on the contrary, are lower than a norm. Persistent infection and bleedings can be a "somatic" cause of this pathology.

MPV (Mean Platelet Volume) is a test for the size and quantity of the thrombocytes produced by the marrow as a protection gear in case of injuries, infections, etc. The index of MPV is lower than a norm - it is a serious failure signaling about an infection, chronic bleedings, serious allergic and endocrinology problems, dangerous autoimmune response, or even about an early stage of blood disease, as serious as leukemia (blood cancer).

If MPV is lower than a norm - it is one of typical effects of microwave (radio wave) radiation of unhealthy frequency.


As similar essential abnormalities were NEVER marked by previous blood tests (before THIS lab test), i.e. appeared ONLY at the end of November 2014 for the first time: it means that my assumptions and suspicions, as well as my demands to refer me to such a blood test - were COMPLETELY justified and confirmed.


And one of the main reasons for the abnormal indexes of blood components was the chronic urinal infection with long-term hematuria (urological bleedings), which treatment doctors sabotaged since 2001, starting with several family doctors, continuing with urologists Dr. Pharan, and Dr. Morris. The only doctors, who tried to clarify the reasons of hematuria, and to find a method of its treatment - were Dr. Ivan Rohan and Dr. El-Hackim (urologist practicing from Montreal). However, they both faced a vicious sabotage of their efforts - from other doctors, from medical laboratories and medical administration, from medical institutions, from the government (the government, as it is clear now, put enormous pressure upon them), and, therefore, their medical help was becoming more and more complicated.


Besides, because of police intimidation, geographical remoteness, and the permanent overcrowdings of the medical office of Dr. El-Hackim (due to what I, a patient from Montreal, felt permanent conscience's pricks) - I could not go any more to this suburb of Montreal, and was forced to become Dr. Morris's patient.


(Maybe, if I continued to visit Dr. El-Hackim, many sad events could be avoided, but, on the other hand, this doctor did not work directly with any hospital - as Dr. Morris, and this, in turn (as I suggested) strongly complicated his opportunities, making difficult (and restricting) the preliminary treatment (diagnostics) and medical treatments in my - difficult - case).


Probably, one of the reasons - for which Dr. Morris fell into rage at the sight of the blood test's copy (November 27, 2014): were abnormalities in blood indexes, in what he (as a quick-tempered person) could see my subject hint on the fact that I accuse him of provoking [since 2011 or 2012 (when I began to visit him)] such an outcome by ignoring my urological problems (in particular - hematuria).


As for the statements of Dr. Morris about, allegedly, my systematic disagreement on the procedure of cystoscopy, which, as he hinted, was the reason of his blockage of the preliminary treatment: here not everything is so single-digit.


During my very 1-st meetings with him (when he did not suggest to undergo cystoscopy yet), I said to Dr. Morris that the cystoscopy performed by Dr. Daniel Pharan on February 3, 2004, was a real disaster; and I described terrible permanent complications caused by this procedure, while it did not yield any result, did not provide any diagnosis, or any solution of my problems.


Dr. Morris never answered my questions about WHAT presumably cystoscopy (in my case) CAN clear up, and WHAT he personally expects from it.


In case of my very 1-st meeting with him in his office (NOT in the examination room) - he found enough time for me, and I freely described my assumptions of what makes my life so miserable.


I connected proctologic problems to urological ones, and assumed that only simultaneous solutions of that and others can bring a success without a surgery - if it is not too late.


I also suggested that a probable calcification is one of the main complications of infections and Dr. Pharan's cystoscopy's damage.


Also, I suggested that a possible narrowing of the outlet is the reason of my suffering, as well as the growing problem of BPE. And I explained to him, why I think so (mentioning an expected obstruction of "both paths", etc.).


Proctologic problem provokes or urges on uncountable urological infections. I told that cystoscopy might not clearly reveal obstructions, and asked to carry out less invasive diagnostic procedures before cystoscopy: transrectal ultrasound scan; Prostate MRI; CT-scan; so-called "virtual" cystoscopy, and colonoscopy; plus - a check on gastric infection, respiratory test and blood test (antibodies) for Helicobacter Pylory), etc.


As soon as one of these procedures gives an answer to questions posed, the remaining may not be necessary. If they do not reveal cardinal problems, only then it is possible to resort to such an invasive procedure as cystoscopy, which already ended so catastrophically for me in 2003.


Besides, I demanded a preventive antibiotic therapy BEFORE cystoscopy, and the guarantee that, in case of serious complications, Dr. Morris will admit me immediately in his office, will examine me, and will assign any treatment if needed. I also insisted on an immediate access to cystoscopy's report-result.


All these assumptions and conditions only angered him, and I did not receive (from him) any response.


Besides, I expressed an assumption that the alpha-blockers, which purpose is "reducing" hypertrophy, could solve partially the problem, so, while the situation improves, and the urological symptoms disappear, then a need for cystoscopy will evaporate by itself, and it will be possible to focus on other problems.


Obviously, any talk to doctor Morris in this way reminded a conversation of the inhabitants of different planets.


My requests and expectations were completely idealistic. Dr. Morris was sure that he does everything correctly, in the correct priority and by the correct method. However, his methodology was wrong in the same way as the whole Canadian health care system is perverse.


In practice, mechanically battling against the diseases, having declared war on them, he was hardly aware of living people; and human sufferings against the background of an overall picture, probably, became in this war a collateral damage ("the accompanying human lives losses" - as say the military while killing civilians).


Therefore, Dr. Morris was torn off from my reality as I was torn from his.


Dr. Morris did not dare to explain (to me) that his office is not a "kindergarten", and that - without a private insurance - nobody will provide me those medical procedures that I expected.


On the other hand, 2 procedures - transrectal ultrasonography and check on gastric infection - are very cheap, and could be easily arranged. Even an MRI is a common, relatively cheap, and generally accepted procedure for non-profit (non-private) urological patients, which Dr. Morris could easily guarantee. Thus, his sabotage of treatment could be explained only by his pathological ego (if he considered that I paid not an adequate tribute to him); his unwillingness to do anything for such a "small" person like me; his expectations about wealth, power, and influence that doctors "must" possess in human society; and his politically motivated hatred (if he indeed knew - who I am and what are my views).


I also expressed (to Dr. Morris) my concern that a possible partial obstruction of the bottom of intestines, permanent inflammation, and dermatitis with ulcers accompanying these pathologies - as well as an obvious infection (and, probably, an infiltrate dripping from within): is a big problem, provoking urological problems as well. Probably, just because he remembered this (my warning), he - later - "did not see" and "did not grope" an internal new growth though it was perfectly defined by my family doctor, and 3 other specialists, and did not react in any way to 2 episodes of almost serious internal bleeding, which he witnessed during 2 of his exams.


Possibly, the vanity and arrogance of Dr. Morris forced him to see my preimage retrospectively as a reproach to his inactivity and as an accusation of ignoring of my words.


I handed a list of dates of some episodes of a "joint" hematuria-gematoschezia, or hematuria-gemotoschezia-gemosp. to Dr. Morris, and asked him to explain - why it occurs.


But on this question, and on my words about what my gastroenterologist told me (concerning specialization of Dr. Morris), and on my request to communicate with my gastroenterologist for joint tactics of treatment, Dr. Morris answered nothing.


It is obvious that he never contacted Dr. Szego, because, otherwise, Dr. Szego would not refer me to another urologist (in Royal Victoria hospital). (However, I never received a rendezvous with that, another, urologist it was sabotaged).


If to proceed from a judgement of the gastroenterologist, Dr. Morris could likewise, on the basis of simplest (so-called "digital") exam - to come to the same conclusions, and, moreover: would come to same conclusions inevitably. Why he, in that case, told me nothing, did not assign any diagnostic and medical procedures?


And, finally, I had one more reason to avoid cystoscopy, which, however, I could not state to Dr. Morris.


I assumed that any next cystoscopy would terminate for me fruitlessly: because, probably, a) its main outputs and results they will hide from me all the same, b) no treatment will be administrated, and c) it will be carried out only pro forma.


Any access to the very first, original reading of cystoscopy's findings, will be blocked for me, and in the successive, "final" report (which I could get from the medical archive only) - all main conclusions will be already cleaned (erased).


The future showed that I was absolutely right in all my assumptions.


Running forward (2016): only by miracle I managed to obtain the prerecording conclusions' report of the cystoscopy - the access to which was immediately blocked for months - literally "in minutes" before it's preparing withdrawal, - and the "fair", "final" report was not found in medical archive.


Dr. Morris personally did everything possible that the cystoscopy's findings did not fall into my hands. He did not tell me that I was right in my assumptions about the "blocking" pr-tic outlet", and, on the contrary, has "encrypted" it in his official report under rare term "from veru", which is not even mentioned in medical dictionaries (though he could use other terminology).


Dr. Morris also did not think to tell me that I was right in my suggestions, and that Dr. Szego's words about a certain connection between moderate problems of the lower part of intestines - and the urological problems, were confirmed.


On the contrary, he hid the cystoscopy's findings, concealed my concrete urological problems, and told me nothing that, beside the stones removal surgery, another surgery is also needed, and did not administrate and did not plan any further medical procedures.


He did not carry out a course of antibiotic prevention in connection with cystoscopy, and, when I contacted him concerning the catastrophic side effects of cystoscopy, he left me to the mercy of fate, having delivered me on the edge of life threatening danger and having subjected me to terrible torments.


He is partially guilty also that the colonoscopy (4 years prior to cystoscopy) was also a disaster - because ended with serious infections, an intensive multi-day hematuria and hematoschezia, and probably injured prostate.


I discussed all these issues with him before cystoscopy, and even asked him whether colonoscopy is dangerous - due to those or other anatomic features and chronic infection, - but he only laughed.


So, it was unimportant, in principle, if cystoscopy would be carried out in 2012, 2014, or in 2015: all the same, even if obstruction was already present by then, and would be detected by cystoscopy, it does not mean automatically that I would be informed - about it, and a surgical procedure would be offered - without an immediate direct threat.


As both colonoscopies terminated with serious infections and "mutual" bleeding (hematuria-hematoschezia) - I asked Dr. Morris, why, but he did not want or could not answer this question.


Let's say that I would agree for cystoscopy years earlier, and it would clear up nothing; or, let us assume: in 2012 - 2014 obstruction was not yet present, or was still minimum, and, thus, cystoscopy would produce no benefits. It would only lead to a new disaster, bringing new suffering and considerable health damage. And - when it would bring some diagnostic results: it would be already too late.


Whether transrectal ultrasound scan; MRI; or CT-scan; "virtual cystoscopy"; or other tests would reveal main problems? Specialists shall tell about it.


However, even without their opinion, I am sure that Dr. Morris's attempts to justify his medical crimes by my refusal (since 2014 or 2015, when he first time insisted on it) to undergo cystoscopy - have no sense.


As well as the guilt of Dr. Daniel Pharan is not subject to doubt, the guilt of Dr. Morris is non-doubtful, too.


As one of the best specialists in his domain, he, certainly, could help me to get rid forever of my main health problem, if he would carried out very timely and effective diagnostic measures, followed by medical treatment, but his sabotage of my current problems - whether before his suggestions to undergo cystoscopy, or after - can not be justified.


Whether a doctor, whose patient refused a heart surgery (which this doctor reads as panacea for his patient) - has the right to cancel altogether medical treatment, sending his patient to grave IMMEDIATELY?


Dr. Morris did not reassign medications, which were prescribed previously by Dr. El-Hackim (urologist, who worked not in Montreal); he refused requisitions for laboratory analyses and antibiotics during episodes of acute urological infections; he refused to prescribe Flomax, Finasteride (of its analog), and other medications.


Whether my refusal of cystoscopy (about late 2015) justifies such actions of Dr. Morris, who, on top of this, tried to excuse and cover up his crimes backdating: it means, in 2012 - 2015?


But we will return now to (mentioned above) blood test...


Blood test report (for November 27, 2014), continuation (see below):


Here test's results of blood coagulation are printed out (see above).

Low (below the norm) blood clotting is dangerous by life-threatening bleedings, which difficult or impossible to stop.

Too high blood clotting is dangerous by the formation of blood clots in veins and obstruction of important arteries, including heart and brain supplying arteries (that may be potentially followed by death).

In my case, the index of PT (INR) above the norm can mean: a) chronic bleedings; b) breach of intravenous blood coagulation; c) liver disease; d) shortage of phthiocol; e) all together.

Right there - in the section of biochemistry - potash index is lower than the norm, almost in upper limits of hypokalemia. And, as hypokalemia was already diagnosed in me in the past years, it should receive an immediate doctors' response by administration an urgent medical treatment (which no doctor did by then).


Blood test report (for November 27, 2014). Next page. (See below).


On this page, the count of cholesterol level is given.

In Canada, there are not American, but European standards and units of count (parameters) on all lab tests components, including count of "good" and "bad" cholesterol.

LDL-cholesterol is a low-lipidic (low density) protein (cholesterol): this is such a biochemical compound, which high level in blood leads to blood vessels degradation, and, respectively, several times increases the risk of cardiovascular diseases, such as ischemic disease, stroke, heart attack and so forth.

In turn, HDL-cholesterol - high-lipidic (high density) protein (cholesterol): promotes a removal of "bad" (LDL-cholesterol) cholesterol from the body, and its concentration in blood is considered a positive signal.

Since 2007, in European Union countries and Canada an acceptable level of cholesterol became different than previously the norm's indication.


In 2002-2003, when, in my blood tests, cholesterol was very elevated, I asked Dr. Zast, Dr. R., and Dr. Piche to prescribe one of medication, known today as medications of the Ezetimibe Common Lipid Lowering Drugs Purpose (LLD) group, which lock the absorption of cholesterol in gastrointestinal tract, and Nicotinic Acid A of group of statines. (In other words, I asked to administrate statin-ezetimibe combination).

But they just recommended sticking to a stricter diet and losing weight though I was already not too fat. I managed to lose weight from 75 to 65-67 kg that - considering with my height of 176 cm - is quite normal, but then doctors began to say that the requested medications "are not prescribed in Canada" without "special situations". Probably, if by then - when I had considerably elevated cholesterol - a prescription of these drugs could prevent degradation of blood vessels, and the need for permanent blood pressure controlling medication.


Blood test report (for November 27, 2014). Next page. (See below).


In this section are given the results of liver condition and the immune system.

Bilirubin is elevated to 32, while the norm is 18. This had to be an alarm, but doctors just ignored it, even when I pointed to this section. In next years, bilirubin in some tests reached 60 and higher indexes, and doctors still just laughed on my concerns.


Results of 3 tests are given in the section of Immunology.


Anti-DNase B Titer, Serum - is the test revealing antibodies, which are produced in response to a streptococcal infection, and, thus, identifying it. It can also define the cause of arthritis if the arthritis resulted from a streptococcal infection's complications.

The Immunoglobulin test (IgG, IgA, and IgM), Serum - is a test for detection of dysfunctions in the form of monoclinic hamopatias and immunodeficiency of one of a range of 5 immunoglobulins (seroproteins). Elevated (above the norm) indexes are characteristic in case of liver diseases (hepatitis and cirrhosis), myelomas, and are (also) characteristic of acute and persistent infections.

Anti-streptolysin O is such an antibody that is produced in response to toxin, which is a coproduct of life activity of streptococci, and, thus, giving them out.


Next page is the urine test report, which is absent. (See below).


Urine test report (from November, 27, 2014). (Blood-urine test) (See above).

Here it is specified that the analysis of urine is absent because a sample was not collected.

If a patient - for one reason or another - refused it (could not or did not want to collect it) SURELY it would be specified in the printout. In this case, there is no explanation or justification of sample's absence. But, actually - in the laboratory, they did not remind me that 2 tests are mentioned in a requisite - blood and urine; nobody gave me a test-tube for the 2-nd (urine) analysis; nobody told me to go collecting the sample and to deliver it to the lab.

Obviously, it happened not because that merely "forgot" about it, but because of the deliberate sabotage.

The lack of explanation, why the specimen was not received, tells that it was not the fault of the patient.

As I already described, they executed a dirty cunning trick for provoking my distress, to distract my attention and preventing my demands for urine test.


See next section of the same blood test report (for November 27, 2014). (See below)


Here (see above) one more surprising thing comes to light.

It is said here that the sample for microorganisms' culture (microbiology) was taken from my right hand, while, in reality, blood was taken ONLY from my left hand.

Whether it is not a surprising part for this test report's printout - in connection with which already so many strangenesses appeared (see above other blood test's sections)?!

Whether it is possible to trust other paragraphs of such a test, where even the hand (from which a sample was taken) (right - instead of left) was incorrectly specified?


A professor-pensioner from Belgium, to whom I sent results of this analysis and who specialized in immunology, endocrinology, rheumatology and allergology, explained that different "parts" of this analysis, in his judgement, "do not match".

Judging by other indexes, indexes of immunoassay shall be different, they "are not combined" with any other data.

He long tried to explain me a key part of the problem, but aurally, and, especially, in French: I did not especially understand him. I asked him to explain briefly, what exactly he found strange in the results of this lab analysis, and he once again repeated that, in case of some of its indexes, others are simply impossible. For example, he told me, in case of bilirubin 32 one of other indexes "is simply obliged" to be different; in case of the raised index of PT (INR) [that just takes place] - something else "is impossible", etc.


NOVEMBER 28, 2014.


Since November 28, 2014 - the skin folliculitis sparked again (which was - for the first time - shown about one and half-two years ago), and, since January or February 2014, had no recurrences.


At 14:00 - sudden and sharp left elbow pain, as though there was a fracture.

And this - against the background of total disappearance of pain in all joints and bones.

I suggested an intraocular pressure, but, again, it was impossible to get an appointment with an ophthalmologist.


NOVEMBER 29, 2014.


On November 27 and 29, and on December 1 - I got annoying injuries, and all in my own apartment: 1) hit the head so hard that a cone appeared on the top; 2) got a bruise of the left foot and the left hand; 3) got injured on the right knee.


Until the end of November, the knee-injury disturbed the most. The Canadian-American movie "The Collector" offers some explanations...


CHAPTER 5.


DECEMBER, 2014.


DECEMBER 3, 2014.


On December 3, 2014, I, finally, got on reception to dermatologist.

My self-diagnosis "hemorrhagic rash" was confirmed.

Now 2 doctors, who contested this diagnosis, had to admit that they were wrong.

3 other doctors, including dermatologist and phlebologist, confirmed it.

Concerning a spot on the hand - this was defined as keratosis. (On what grasped my ear: I think, Dr. Mari Saint-Jacques meant "seborrheal keratosis" (among them, dermatologists called it "Sinaie").


Thus, my self-diagnosis "hemorrhagic rash" was confirmed by 3 experienced top-level experts-doctors: Dr. Mari San-Jacques, Dr. Simon Meritier, and the Dr. Kavadjian from the walk-in clinic.


See below: The business card of Dr. Mari Saint-Jacques, with date of rendezvous for December 3, 2014.


See below: The prescription written out by Dr. Mari Saint-Jacques on 3 different medications. December 3, 2014.


Cyst - too, allegedly, not a cyst, but "a sinew thickening".

I found this diagnosis disputable.

A "thickening of a sinew" does not grow, and this "piece" grew from a "kernel" to approximately a "pea". [Running forward: this cyst later disappeared by itself. If this was a "sinew thickening" - it would not disappear like that.]


Having pondered the situation, I concluded that all this is some general disease and that most of all it reminds an immunoglobulin-A-vasculitis. All symptoms match. Everything, to uniform.


But it does not mean yet that - surely - this is automatically an autoimmune failure; it is possible that something just similar to it happened - another autoimmune malfunction, which was just not defined.


However, when I got to my family doctor, he said - that "patients do not "finding" themselves diagnoses", it is a "prerogative of doctors".


I replied that I do not make myself diagnoses, but I only suggest, and wish to receive either a confirmation, or a refute.


But he refused to continue this conversation, however, writing out a requisition for additional tests.


Amazingly, the dermatologist talked to me just in the same tone, as well as the doctor in the walk-in clinic.


Moreover, at the end of the rendezvous, she said that my exaggerated concern about "le petite problème" reminds "hypochondria", and, in reality, I, allegedly, "have nothing serious". And she hinted that - because of this - precious doctors' time and the state's money are spent for "unnecessary" exams and procedures.


If to rephrase it differently - my suspiciousness, but not my health problems bring me into medical institutions!


But any honest doctor or professor (a teacher of a medical institute) - will confirm that hemorrhagic rash alone - is a serious alarm.


Let's add to this all recent abnormal changed in blood formula, which never happened before: and you have a very different picture of alleged "hypochondria". The changes in blood formula could not happen without a reason, and my severe indisposition (comparing even to my entire previous health problems saga) was alarming something not "very positive" BEFORE the blood test!


But let's go back to my conversation with the dermatologist.


In the beginning, she did not mention a word about the diagnosis "hemorrhagic rash", and I was silent, without having told anything about my visits (concerning this rash) to other doctors: concealing that I know - what it is.


She only explained that - as in a sanitary hub, when the pressure (loading) increases, something is starting to leak. And with capillaries (of the interior of feet) is just the same. In case of the pressure increasing - in case of running, walking on long distances - capillaries begin "to leak". And the hemorrhagic rash appears. (Now she named it).


But she did not even give a hint about the fact that such phenomenon often demonstrates severe dysfunction of blood supply and blood composition.


The same is with the cyst.


I showed the terrible cosmetic pattern, which remained after abscess's clean up on the spine, and asked, why it still hurts so much and why looks so terribly. (I said no words about the cyst, which provoked the abscess).


She said that there was not just an abscess, but also a small cyst. Then I noted: whether it is necessary to wait until the same happens to the cyst on the left foot - or it is better to remove it after all? I showed - what appeared on site of a similar cyst (which arose also on an old scar) on my forehead, - and asked - whether it is not enough (mockeries: but did not pronounce this aloud)?


Of course, this doctor is a top-class specialist, as far as I understand, but - after all the "miracles" described in this wide report - it is hard to believe that a dermatologist could define that the surgery on the back is connected not only to an abscess, but also to a cyst. Maybe, all doctors are just kept "informed"?


I succeeded to get on reception to a "new" doctor, whom I never visited before. One more attempt to break off a vicious circle.


Though I booked this appointment in advance (the secretary - is an acquaintance of acquaintances), this doctor - at first - refused to talk to me at all. He tried "to throw" me out from his office. Then, probably, having understood that I am not a monster (as someone, probably, figured me), he "was mitigated", and said confidentially that he has nothing against me, but that such a "concern" (as mine) about health issues transforms a person into an persuasive and hypochondriac patient, who abuses the sources of the state medical system. And - at the end - he said that, for few weeks, I managed (and not one time) to see "lot" of doctors, and "exhausted" all "limits" of my "walk on doctors".


From where he knows - how many doctors I visited, and, in general, this is not his busyness!


I tried to explain that the frequency of my visits is connected to ascend and complications of symptomatology, and, when one doctor did not resolve a problem, I am forced to seek another doctor, but he did not allow me to open my mouth any more.


(I thought about myself: then, how to interpret the fact that, since May - beginning of June - after the epic of abscess - my leg did not step into medical institutions? How IT corresponds to the charges and whether it is inscribed into an "image of enemy"? And, if - after half a year - I "suddenly" began "to run on doctors" - that, maybe, it is called by an objective reason?!).


It should be stressed that talks about the cost of the governmental medical treatment and about the "abuse" of the medical system is something outstanding (in Canada). [At least: for now, in 2017.] How many newspapers' articles I read in local newspapers with the criticism of medical organizations; how much I communicated with other patients "on corridors"; how many stories by acquaintances, family members, and relatives, colleagues and neighbors I remember: I never heard anything similar from anybody. How much I looked into the plots in television news; how deeply "dig" Canadian Internet forums on the appropriate subject: anywhere even a slightest hint.


It is sure that no doctor starts such talk with one patient. From there can be drawn only one conclusion: 1) not the doctors, but some foreign and Canadian governmental institutions and affiliated with them doctors take part in politically motivated persecutions, and 2) it is only a pretext. Actually - all persecutions originated from the contents of my refugee file and the statements made in the Federal court, and all provocations and sabotage of the medical help appeared in response to my vision of the world.


And one of these manifestations: the systematic blockage of medical care and systematic damage to my health. Because of the impression that I learned (to some extent), how to bypass this boycott, someone is enormously enraged, and, therefore, obviously went too far.


I will repeat that, as far as I know, the immunoglobulin-A-vasculitis occurs in adults considerably less often. It also develops in them in much more severe form. It is considered that an age, dangerous for this pathology - is after 45. And I am already 60. In case of this disease, in that part of kidneys - where there are glomeric fabrics filtering blood - accumulate deposits of proteins, enlarged cells, abnormal cells in the filtering area, and all transit fabrics (i.e. the epithelium covering kidneys, ureters, an urinary bladder, etc.).


"Brown urine" - is a very characteristic symptom of a problem with fabrics of the filtering glomerit in kidneys. It happened to me - since November 18, 2014 - 2 times. (One of other possible causes: kidneys and (or) urinary bladder stones, but any of many ultrasound tests did not reveal calcification in these organs yet; or all these tests were forged?).


The kidneys blood vessels passing through the prostate, etc. could be "touched".


December 8, 2014.


Since December 8, 2014: intensification of the hemorrhagic phenomena; except hematuria of brown and bright red color nuance, the same was in other rheum. It is a direct consequence of the denial of antibiotics.


December 10, 2014.


On December 10, 2014, Wednesday, I came to the office of my family doctor- instead of the registered scheduled visit on Friday, December 12, 2014.


The fact is that on Wednesdays (from 8:00 in the morning) he is seeing patients with emergency cases. But he came only after 9:00 in the morning, and I think that this delay was somehow connected to me.


Therefore, firstly, patients with the regular visits (I came before 8:00) were called to his office, then he defiantly invited (to his office) people, who came after me (with urgent cases, like mine) ... But the randomness failed him: whether because of the weather, whether for other reason - nobody remained in a waiting room, except of me...


He started a very "small talk" (and very pleasant) about the weather, took an interest in my affairs (not such as health): he was pure affability. It seemed, this did not worry him - whether new patients (and how many) will come to see him, and how long they should wait until he talks profusely on abstract subjects. But once I gave a hint at the health problems, he frowned openly, grew dark, became unfriendly, and tried to expel me from his office. But (for him) it was not so simple to kick me out (for such a responsible and compassionate doctor), and he examined the "remains" of the rash, having said that it is in any way not a hemorrhagic rash, but a normal folliculitis.


From the fact that he told it in an insincere tone, and hid his eyes - it was possible to draw a conclusion that he does not think so, and speaks the opposite to his own conclusions (which he decided not to disclose). And all this denial - as far as I understood - is related to Dr. Morris's rage concerning the same blood test.


On August 22, 2014, my family doctor claimed by just the same tone about the X-ray of the toe of the right leg (June 2, 2014) that the X-ray "did not show any fracture". When I disputed it, saying "Doctor, it is written in black and white that the picture shows the "posttraumatic changes, such as a healed fracture", he tore off me and rumpled the subject.


In May 2014, I asked to send me for an X-ray because the toe continued to ache and disturb. I said that I could not put on any footwear, and experienced other ordeals and problems.


Though he directed me for this toe X-ray, he did not show me its result-report, and I had to get it in another place and to bring him its copy.


I shall remind that I was forced to treat the fracture and to restore this toe (the right leg) myself - for long time and persistently by all methods known to me, without any help from physicians and that Emergency Room Department of the same hospital with which my family doctor cooperates. I was denied an exam by a surgeon; I was denied follow-ups; I was denied crutches, which I could not afford renting or buying; I was denied referral to CLSC; I was denied referral to physiotherapy; and, finally, they told me nothing about the fracture of the neighboring toe. Now, when this X-Ray confirmed 2 fractures (in 2 toes), my family doctor had to refer me for rehabilitation physiotherapy, but he could not, because such a referral could constitute a blame against the ER medical staff. This fully explains his unwillingness to admit that all complains about the mistreatment in ER and my guesses about the second fracture were justified.


As for hemorrhagic rash, first, there is a photo of just the same rash under an appropriate text in one of my illustrated medical reference manuals. Secondly, 4 doctors (see about 3 of them above, and the 4-th was a urologist (Dr. Morris), who did not confirm aloud my self-diagnosis, but also did not dispute it, and, so, agreed).


On my declaration that other doctors had a different judgment, my family doctor reacted as follows: "And I read it so and not differently".


When I emphasized that now, when the rash turned pale, probably, it is difficult to define - what it was, he, still, continued to claim categorically the same, having emphasized that he does not agree with these doctors. However, I felt that he's not saying what he things.


I understood it as his attempt to downplay the importance of this occurrence of hemorrhagic rash, not as his disagreement with other doctors. He just wanted to raise my spirit, and, probably, believed that I may fully recover, if I'll not be concentrated on bad things. His stubbornness in denying this diagnosis was nothing else but an attempt to distract my attention from depressing things. (If not to mention his unwillingness to recognize the truth due to the conformity with the medical authorities, to which he was subjected to).


Concerning blood test, he also told that does not see "anything", "any deviations", that "all results are great" and that with such indexes I am - a "healthiest person in the world".


I had a temptation to ask, why bilirubin (32!) is so high; why the deviations in blood components linked to coagulation (below the norm, depressed), thrombocytes, etc., are principally NOW surfaced? (All 5 components' of abnormalities never appeared before, which suggests that something really worsening has happened just now, in last few months!).


Probably, I should start my conversation with my family doctor from these particular abnormalities and their absence in the past. I had to specify concrete "checkboxes" in the blood test's printout, but, instead, focused his attention mostly on the symptoms and on immunoglobulin-A vasculitis. However, I doubt if this could make a difference, as my family doctor was, probably, already instructed by the medical authorities to ignore ANY of my complaints; he was disorientated, discouraged, and depressed, and did not calculated yet - how to resist to such a brutal force.


Besides, my family doctor's stubborn negation of my latest suggestions had an additional motivation, as he also told that, assuming this very specific and complex diagnosis, which only professional doctors can assume, I encroach on shop of the medical monopoly, because every professional doctor persistently studied for years, spent decades of his life for experience and knowledge - and here a fan claims the same knowledge. He also said that if I found a diagnosis with these symptoms on Internet, it does not mean that this matches the truth. It should be noted that - as a rule - I normally rummage exclusively in my own electronic archive, without going online, but - in this case - I glanced in the Net.


(During the last period (especially, since 2013) the search engines generally block me the access, and I must exercise a wit to bypass technically this prohibition. It is an additional incentive to use only my own medical library).


Meanwhile, his refusal to recognize the hemorrhagic rash played an important medical and legal role: because - in case of recognition - he was obliged to take it seriously - against the background of other symptoms of dangerous autoimmune response. Even more important, that he ignored this dangerous allergic reaction in general, separately from the question of the hemorrhagic rash.


Thus, 2 doctors - the urologist (Dr. Morris) and my family doctor, professor of medicine - headed for categorical denial of a dangerous immunological response, which threatened (if it was not treated) to cause some kind of damage on genetic (cellular) level (which leads to acceleration of aging); and could damage kidneys, skeletal system and even to instigate a blood disease.


Besides, the urologist, Dr. Brian Morris, ignored - and even condemned - my concern about systematic bleedings, still insisting that this pathology presents "no trouble" and that - when the reason of bleedings is unknown, and - at the same time - "no drama" occurs, it is "considered" that the permanent hematuria: is a "normal phenomenon". He repeated it twice or, even, three times during different rendezvous. However, I am absolutely sure that he perfectly knew, which was the cause of the bleedings, and was perfectly aware of the tortures, which I experience, and was aware of the level of damage and danger.


For the denial of dangerous autoimmune response, Dr. Morris had to deny - by all means - 3 basic pathologies-symptoms:


1) hemorrhagic rash;

2) sudden and important abnormal changes shown by the blood tests' reports;

3) acute inflammation of joints.


Having seen the listing of symptoms (a statement from a walk-in clinic doctor), Dr. Morris said that the elbows and knees hurt because I spend "15 hours at the computer".


Isn't it strange that my family doctor said literally the same, raising a question - what was the source of their information about how many hours I spend in front of the computer?


Then I emphasized that one of the joints especially hurts, and told (to Dr. Morris and to my family doctor) about the intolerable pain in the left arm's elbow, and added that I have this pain for many weeks.


My family doctor and Dr. Morris (both!) responded that if sitting "on the computer" for "11 hours in a row", then it is possible to expect "any pain".


(Isn't it strange - how both of them replaced 15 hours with 11).


I had a strong temptation to ask - how did they learned how many hours I spend at the computer, but I thought that the fact of their argument is, probably, spoke enough by itself.


Another thing is pretty interesting.


In November and the beginning of December 2014, I used to spend in front of the computer screen and behind the keypad much less time than usually (4-5 hours) - listening and composing music instead, but, approximately, since December 5-6, I began to be engaged in finalizing of my very huge - 100-volume - work, spending on its text exactly 11 hours a day (!). This "accidental" coincidence we should remember and "keep in mind".


I don't mention that such a justification of the denial of medical help by the pretext of patient's professional or social activity is unethically unacceptable in itself, not to mention that it was used by both doctors on the basis of some kind of spying and privacy violation information.


However, we can go in our assumptions even further away.


What, if it was a delicate, but a very transparent hint (enclosed in doctors' lips by some "higher" authorities) that - if I stop spending so much time working on my historical (seeing by someone as "political") works - (i.e. if I stop be engaged in "harmful" (i.e. unacceptable for SOMEONE) activities): then "they" can rethink their unwillingness or their incapability of providing real medical help?


Of course, it is easy to tell that my assumptions are completely farfetched, but it is not fruitful to hurry with such conclusions; and, at first, it is worth agreeing them with the previous and subsequent facts, which, alas, leave a backdoor way even for such ominous assumptions.


While Dr. Morris completely ignored my complaints that the permanent urinal infection and inflammation trigger an autoimmune response, and it, in turn, is causing arthritis, my family doctor asked me whether cold or heat HELPED me. I answered that nothing helps - cold, warm compresses, EVEN ASPIRIN (which I used to take for month or two in 2013).


I added that the elbow joint is always warmer than its environment, and, so, there is unceasing inflammation continues.


Thus, already on December 10, 2015 (when the irreversible changes did not occur yet - neither in elbow, nor in carpal, nor in shoulder joints) - my family doctor ALREADY knew what to expect, and what awaits me in the future.


(It was not too late by then to try to conduct an anti-coccal course of treatment, to prescribe anti-inflammatory medications [Naproxen, Allopurinol, Celebrex, etc.], and to stop the attack on bones-joints).


And, nevertheless, none of the doctors (whom I visited or contacted (totally 6 doctors) - not only my family doctor- referred me neither to rheumatologist, nor to X-ray, nor to blood tests on rheumatoid factor, a-reactive protein, level of uric acid, etc.; no one prescribed neither antibiotics, nor anti-inflammatory (as I insisted).


If by THEN - anti-inflammatory would not help (but I believe that it would help!), still there was time to establish a diagnosis and to use a DIFFERENT treatment.


The most astonishing was the denial of the renewal of the blood-pressure controlling medication. Something very disturbing was behind this refusal. Emotionally and psychologically, I was sure that my family doctor had good reasons to halt this renewal for my own safety. Theoretically, he would reserve such an extreme measure if he suspected that the authorities were planning something bizarre: to deliver expired or poisoned pills; or to sabotage medications' delivery, and so on. I cannot prove my intuitive deduction, but I believe that my family doctor had some hidden reasons to be afraid of some sort of provocation. He told me that the pharmacy should send him a fax. I reminded him that - as a rule (in the past) - the pharmacy refused to do it, demanding that I shell bring just another prescription from the doctor, but he remained relentless.


Meanwhile, in a stressful situation like this, against the background of an autoimmune reaction and in case of unprecedented hematological abnormalities shown by blood test report, and urine count test's abnormalities, and more and more frequent UT infections - any sudden stoppage of blood pressure controlling medication can cause any dramatic outcome.


It was easy to calculate the source of my family doctor's irritation: it was he, who referred me to Dr. Morris, and that later, judging by indirect indications, called my family doctor in November, attacking his colleague for the fact that he "threw" to him "such a patient" as me.


No doubts that my family doctor had serious troubles because of me, and if he was not such a respected doctor with non-reputable reputation and authority, he could lose both his office and his medical license simply for not stopping medical help for me. Certainly, if it was so, then I had to look for another doctor, because it would be unethical to remain his patient (in that case). However, there were only my assumptions, and, secondly, I could not do it in such a moment, when not just my health, but my life was under a real threat.


When I began to place an emphasis on bleedings, trying to convince my family doctor that "something must be done" about it (that doctors have no right to leave me without medical care with SYSTEMATIC bleedings), he declared literally the following: "But you "always" have bleedings".


Fine argument for a doctor not to treat his patient!


Understanding that he already went too far, he eased, and added: "Well, there was an infection every time in the same place, and it passed every time after a course of antibiotics".


But, when I asked to prescribe antibiotics again, he refused to do it on my request.


He also added that, as the therapist, he "does not see", "from his side", what he can do and with what he can help", and advised me "to walk on specialists" (urologist, hematologist, cardiologist, etc.).


There was no doubt that it was a hint on the fact that an access to antibiotics was disabled for me by Dr. Morris, and that everything (including my access to specialists like cardiologist, rheumatologist, etc.) depends now ONLY on Dr. Morris and the "thoughts police" in the federal and provincial governments.


When I reminded to my family doctor that - without his referrals - I am not able to access specialists like urologist or hematologist, he said: "It is your problems".


Then I repeated the request of antibiotics of wide action spectrum, stressing that I have a permanent hematuria and other bleedings (caused - as I assumed - by an infection, outlet's obstruction, diuresis (from time to time), etc.). I said that antibiotics are urgently needed to avoid

1) serious complications, and

2) dangerous autoimmune response to the infection, which, sooner or later, will be equal by its own threat to the infection.


And again, he refused.


It is important to highlight that now he did not provide generally any reason of his refusal of antibiotics.


So, my family doctor- among other things - refused to do something concerning intolerable elbow pain.


(Later X-ray showed that, in addition to all other things, there was a healed fracture).


I could go to other doctors, to ER, and also to state my demands to my family doctor in writing, but - in the last 5 months - I was facing aggressiveness, intolerance, wild charges and claims, hints and open reproaches in hypochondria from all doctors whom I visited during this time, and who actually ignored quite all my complaints.


So, a bit later, I made a conclusion that, among other things, it was a result of Dr. Morris's hostility and fruits of his revenge.


One more reason for avoiding an open conflict and for submission to System's cruelty was the primary task of fighting against the next acute urological infection and its priority (as I supposed by then).


The psychological discomfort from even thoughts alone to get into another conflict with doctors and medical institutions, forced me to rely on my own methods of treatment of bones and joints, which - I hoped - will work. As showed the near future, this time these hopes were not fated to come true.


But even if I would visit other doctors, or would address to Emergency Room, or would send my notes to doctors, this (as it was clarified later) would not bring ANY RESULT.


A convincing example - my last written message (sent by fax) to Dr. Morris, who not just absolutely ignored it, but attacked me in rage.


As I already noticed, on November 19, 2014, all my "tags" were once again torn down, and, besides, I found in the computer (which was never connected to Internet), in the cache, traces of the connection to Internet. Besides, something was sent from this computer (which never had even network driver installed) by an email... from my own email box.


For the second time the same occurred on December 3, 2014, while I sat at doctor's office, and nobody been in our apartment.


I found traces of connection to Internet in system files again. Besides, to installation of languages, which I installed myself (British English, French, Italian, Russian, Belarusian, Polish and German) was "accidentally" added "Canadian English" and "Canadian French".


December 11, 2014.


On December 11 (2022), I managed to get to Dr. Morris again.


I was struck by contradiction between his noble okay to my extra visit (the secretary obtained his personal permission, when I called by phone) - and his absolute unwillingness to speak and communicate with me - when I came (approximately at 9:30 in the morning).


He did not even begin to examine the blood test (PSA), and - on my bewilderment - said that I am, allegedly, abusing the state medical system, having done 2 blood tests "in a row" (November 27 and December 8).


Thus, he agreed to see me not for rendering an urgent medical help, but for having a chance to attack and assault me.


When, even more puzzled, I presented an additional objection to his claims - that one blood test was administrated not by him, but by another doctor, for good reasons, and concerning other health problems; and that one of 2 blood tests he administrated himself, and, surely, he knew, why - he met by the note that each such blood test costs 500 dollars, and the Canadian government is paying for it by public money. (Later I found out that he was lying to me about the cost of a blood test).


It is clear, that no constructive talk and no exam by the doctor is possible in case of such a prejudice.


Moreover, Dr. Morris never (before) spoke to me so roughly and aggressively; he never was so furious - as in the morning on December 11, 2014, when I brought him the printout of this blood test (done on requisition of November 26, 2014).


He attacked me nearly with fists; he began to shout that I do "too many" "same" analyses, and - thereby - "already robbed the state" on "lump sum".


As I already mentioned above - when I tried to mind him that the blood test - to which he sent me - and another blood test (which copy I brought to show him): are 2 DIFFERENT (not identical) blood tests, with checks on DIFFERENT components, he began to shout at me even more aggressively, and said again that the cost of blood test is 500 dollars, and that, in his judgement, those, who abuse "the "free Canadian" health care - should be deprived of the right to use the free public medical care.


In rage, Dr. Morris broke off the printout of the second blood test into pieces, but then tried to calm himself, managed to get himself together, accurately put paper scraps, and handed them back to me.


An obvious link between attacks and charges of Dr. Morris - and verbal accusations from immigration officials (including an ugly scene in Montreal Chest Institute) in 1999 - 2001 - is visible, as they say, with the naked eye, calling even such assumptions, that, somehow, Dr. Morris had some relation or access to my immigration file.


When - in January, 2015 (i.e. no more than a month later) - I came once again to the same walk-in clinic - where (on December 26, 2014) the doctor administrated this blood test (which put Dr. Morris in near madness and made him angry and furious like crazy), and asked to be examined by the same doctor (I called her surname), they responded that she does not work in this clinic any more. Then I asked - where she works now, because I had the same questions, and because she is a very good and aware doctor; at first - they "were rumpled", and then nevertheless responded that she - generally - left Montreal.


From this, I drew a conclusion that Dr. Morris denounced her to the authorities, that, having seen her surname in blood test's printout - which I showed him on December 11, 2014 - he attacked her in some administrative medical institutions: and destroyed her life and career.


This case, probably, gained fame in medical circles of Montreal, so, after this incident, I began to be exposed even to wider repressions and mockeries in medical institutions...


It is possible to assume that - after Monday (it was by then - when I contacted Dr. Morris with a request of emergency reception) - there was something else, and that my family doctor, the doctor from that walk-in clinic, and Dr. Morris - arranged a reunion by phone and discussed me (because Dr. Morris knew about my yesterday's visit to my family doctor).


It is also possible to guess that the blood test - to confirm or rule out the immunoglobulin-A vasculitis - or an infection - enraged the urologist, Dr. Morris, to such a degree, that he called the walk-in clinic, and suited the clinic's doctor "dressing down".


When I reminded that the antibiotics (and then a surgery) would be an only panacea from bleedings and infection's recurrences since 2001, Dr. Morris said with anger that "Antibiotics are not allowed for you any more", and my counter-question "Because of what, or by whom not allowed?" - he left without any response.


From confidential sources, I know that Dr. Morris is a member of

1) doctors-medical executive committee of the interactive medical program;

2) one more committee of medical officers;

3) owner of a firm, which is controlling the online network system for checking in of patients and their visits to doctors.


And, I think, that is not all.


In other words, this doctor: is a representative of the medical authorities, and, so, not just plays cruel games because of a pressure put upon him, but - apparently - himself (to some extent) defines them.


I believe that Dr. Morris fully understood how dangerous was my condition, and what troubles he could face if would do absolutely nothing, and, probably, that's why he gave me a requisition on cytology though the use from this analysis in this situation - as from a gantry of milk: well, they will find again atypical transit cells mutants (cells of epithelial covering urinary bladder, ureters, kidneys, and other organs of a urogenital path) - and what? Than and how it will help? A single sense of such analysis: to check whether there are no malignant cells, for early preliminary treatment and - if necessary - an aggressive surgical procedure after cystoscopy. But the oncology of transit cells: it is such a terrible thing that if doctors would provoke such an outcome by medical sabotage - then the rest of life becomes mere vegetation.


Living further under permanent threat of similar things, against the background of the medical sabotage and systematic loss of lab analysis' results (or blockage of access to them) - became impossible.


So, it reached to a situation, when already you want - or you do not want, but it is necessary to turn to some courts, arbitration, to deputies, newspapers, etc.


Fight against the threat of deportation "to any country" (including countries with civil war in Africa and Latin America) took away from me (and from my close ones) nearly entire 10 years of life, during which the full time I had to spend on lawsuits and everything that was connected to them. Sadly, if in the evening of my life I have to spend most of my time and efforts fighting against a threat of "deportation" from users of health care system.


From November 25, 2014, to December 11, 2014, there was a specially frightening hematuria - twice - to a shade of brown color.


Concerning Dr. Morris's rage, when he saw the mentioned blood test's report: he realized very well that most of the abnormalities detected by this blood test were provoked by chronic infection and chronic hematuria (going on for years), and, thus, he realized that this test's report was an accusation against him. However, if Dr. Morris is an executioner, who's task is to murder "enemies of the State" on orders of secret police: he might know that a secret weapon can be used against him as well, if he fails, and it could make him especially furious.


_________________________________


CHAPTER 6.


December 14, 2014


With one more requisition - on December 14, 2014 - I did another blood test, which complete report I present below (all pages).


Blood test of December 8, 2014. Page One.


(See below)


"Bad" MPV index (Mean Platelet Volume) - again.

(This pathology was detected for the first time after the 2-nd inexplicable vertigo (beginning of January, 2014; see above) [the 1-st such an attack - 2005; the last one - 2017] - with vomiting, 13 thousand leukocytosis, and other strange symptoms, and was keeping to stay in all followed years).

This test is a test for the size and quantity of thrombocytes - produced by marrow as a protection gear in case of injuries, infections, etc.

If the index of MPV is lower than the norm - it must be considered as a serious problem signaling about an infection, chronic bleedings, exposure to radiation or toxic matters, serious allergic or endocrinological problem, dangerous autoimmune response, or even about an early stage of a blood disease, as serious as leukemia (blood cancer).

If MPV is lower than norm: it could be one of the typical effects of microwave (radio wave) radiation of unhealthy frequency.


Blood test of December 8, 2014. Next Page. (See below)


Sugar level in blood (glucose) at the level of pre-diabetes, but any doctor (copies were sent: to Dr. Rohan, to Dr. Krasny, etc.) did not find time to tell me about sugar's elevated level, to discuss dietary and other counter-diabetes measures, or to administrate medical treatment (aspirin, for example).

But it wasn't the first blood test, which exposed this or even higher pre-diabetes levels. The previous analyses were likewise ignored, as well as this one. This time the elevated index of glucose did not escape from my attention, but - in the period of again and again aggravated urological - nephrological problems and acute arthritis: my attention was focused on studying other counts. But even this time: I just drew conclusions for myself, and did not dare to reproach doctors. What sense to bring up this subject in talks with doctors, who, having received 5 (!) blood tests of the patient, where the level of sugar was even more elevated, told nothing to their patient, and did not undertake any preventive and medical measures, i.e. actually concealed from the patient his possible creep into diabetes.


Blood test (December 8, 2014). Next page. (See below)


The biochemical section, where, despite formally "safe" indexes, there is also not everything is looking so bright and iridescent, but who will pay attention to such "trifles" against the background of dramatic problems of absolutely other order...


Blood test (December 8, 2014). Kidneys profile. (See below)


Nephrological index of the same blood test result of December 8, 2014, which should be considered in connection with some other results. It is necessary to mark that here the situation became better than in November, 2014.


Blood test (December 8, 2014). Biochemistry. (See below)


It is important to admit that the most of the indexes now are better than in November, which hints an inevitable conclusion: there was a REAL health crisis in November 2014, which is indisputable. It is also important to mention that I did not take aspirin, or any other medications or vitamins in 2014, only the blood pressure controlling pills; so, nothing could influence the changes in the blood formula.


In the same month (December, 2014), the same doctor - Dr. Morris (urologist) - gave up to my demands, and, finally, agreed to administrate an abdominal-pelvic ultrasound.


His actions represent (in this case) a mystery, as it is one more example of very contradictory acts of doctor Morris.


This doctor, who refused urine tests and antibiotics during the recurrences of acute infection, and who attacked me for "becoming a "too expensive" patient" (as if I could prescribe medications and write out requisitions myself!), suddenly agrees to order a procedure, which was refused by all other doctors for a long period of time.


To be more precise: I demanded ultrasound during all my previous visits to Dr. Morris, and was about to state my demand this time, too, but he was faster, starting to speak about the ultrasound a second ahead of me.


All other doctors refused an ultrasound, in spite of my persistent demands, and he did not. Strange? Then - WHY? Certainly, this procedure was assigned not for the sake of my "benefits", but just because Dr. Morris wanted "been reinsured" in case of polyps or stones in the urinary bladder, about which can signal an "asymptomatic" hematuria.


His gesture (administration of ultrasound) also testify that only he alone was allowed (permitted) to order this procedure, not any other doctor.


Nevertheless, it was a positive gesture from his side though it could be considered also from another perspective. Considering my repeated and persistent requests for antibiotics, Dr. Morris's requisition for ultrasonography was kind of "replacement" (i.e. administrated "instead of" antibiotics).


Yet, I - all the same - once again asked to prescribe antibiotics (and was refused on this request).


I also asked for a requisition on transrectal ultrasonography (together with normal ultrasound). But, probably, Dr. Morris - to justify his actions - followed instructions "on duty", purely formally and mechanically. And - therefore - refused the transrectal ultrasonography (which could reveal the main problem).


I will repeatedly contour some events of 2014:


It is possible to read that - since May 29, 2014 - the attitude of Dr. Brian Morris towards me has radically changed. I did not find any explanations for this phenomenon. Then (because Dr. Morris refused to issue the same test), on May 30, 2014, I went to my family doctor, and asked for a requisition on urine test. The result on microbiology (culture) was negative. It could happen for several reasons: maybe, time was lost, and the infection just has passed, or, maybe, the test's result was not genuine, etc.


The same happened on November, 26, 2014, when I came to Dr. Morris: after my persistent demands of the blood (PSA+) - urine test and his refusal (his first reaction), he, finally, issued a requisition for the test. I had no idea that he did not include urine test in the requisition, and found this out - to my astonishment - only when came to the lab to do the test.


See below: Card on a rendezvous with doctor Morris for November 26, 2014.


See below: the requisition on blood test, ordered by doctor Morris on November 26, 2014.


Whether it is strange that the UROLOGIST "forgot" to include also the urine test into this requisition, especially as I came to visit him concerning an acute urinal infection, and also stated an assumptions concerning lithemia (i.e. I stressed that it was necessary to clarify the level of uric acid not only in blood, but in urine as well - because of the simultaneous (as a rule) attacks of urological infections and arthritis, and because of my suspicion that a lithiasis (calcification stones formation in the bladder) could already taking place).


On November 25, 2014 - bleeding: intestinal or gastric with bright, red blood. On symptoms it happens in case of hemorrhoids, but in case of its absence: it is an alarm No. 1. Besides, I just sat at the computer (i.e. bleeding was spontaneous, started by "itself".) It was not followed by any pain.


Approximately, since November 18, 2014 - microhematuria again, and then hematuria in whole format.


The last urine test (October, 2014) did not reveal it, and the tests at doctors' offices did not show it (tests of "litmus" paper). Hematuria and hematos. always disappeared after a course of broad action antibiotics - such as Protrin.


It is even more disturbing that the bleedings appear in the form of bloody selections, with abundant bright red (fresh) or brown ("old") blood, with the "baked" pieces (blood clots). It never happened before.


Few weeks the right eye (symptoms of an infection - as well) was itchy and watery.


I will repeat other symptoms (which were already listed above):

sudden joint pains (elbows and knees);

hemorrhagic rash;

strange easy (light) cough (very short-time - 5-10 minutes - 1-2 times a day);

intestines pains;

tormenting feeling in kidneys, followed by fever, weakness, phenomenon of "feeling sick";

also - fever: "separately" from unpleasant feelings in kidneys;

sudden weakness.


Besides the listed above: skin infection - spot on the right hand (since November 25, 2014).


On the same day (Tuesday, November 25, 2014 (after the loss of several computer files I did not succeed in restoring the exact chronology up to the end) I got to urologist, Dr. Morris. Microhematuria was confirmed.


I handed over - to Dr. Morris - a page with blood-urine test components, which I would like to check: PSA (cancer blood test), antibodies (irregular proteins), creatinine, hematuria, microbiology culture.


Dr. Morris refused to listen to "other" (allegedly, "not connected with his specialization") "complaints" though he could (and shall) listen to them.


He actually "kicked" me out from his office, though such a serious pathology as massive hematuria - is his specialization, and, moreover - his direct duty of care about patients.


Though the spontaneous rectal bleeding happened right before my visit to him (and smaller leaking still continued even after my exit from home (to Dr. Morris's office), he did not even take care to take an interest - and to do somehow. He only wiped his hands in medical rubber gloves (densely covered by blood) by a napkin, but asked nothing and did not say anything.


Both specialists, whom I visited after November 20, 2014, refused to listen to other ("not connected to their "specialization") "complaints" - though they could and shall take them into account as important symptoms giving answers to many questions.


From November 25, 2014, to December 11, 2014, there happened a special hematuria twice - to a shade of brown color.


____________


Lev Gunin


THE PUNITIVE HEALTH CARE

[HEALTH CARE AS A REPRESSIVE TOOL]


BOOK 5-6


THE UROLOGICAL DRAMA. PART 6. [Jan.-Apr. 2015]


CONTENT


Chapter 1.

Chapter 2.

Chapter 3.

Chapter 4.

Chapter 6.

Chapter 7.

Chapter 8.


__________


* * *


The whole text of the chronological events and medical documents (under the name of "The Punitive Health Care - (Health Care as a Repressive Tool)" is available for examination only on the basis of the following contract between the author and the reader:


I (THE READER) GIVE MY CONSENT THAT, BY CLICKING CORRESPONDING LINKS AND ACCESSING THE TEXT OF "THE PUNITIVE HEALTH CARE", I AUTOMATICALLY AGREE TO THE FOLLOWING PRELIMINARY CONDITIONS [FOR READING]:


-- I am (at least) 18 years old.


1. I (the reader) is undertaking (commit myself) not to distribute the text of "The Punitive Health Care - (Health Care as a Repressive Tool)" - entirely, or in fragments; not to copy medical documents; and not to share the text and images without author' permission.


2. I (the reader) understand that the confidential information, which is contained in this text, cannot be used for any other [than the reading (extraneous; secondary)] purposes and needs, for any researches, essays, stories, etc.


3. I (the reader) commit myself not to sneer at open ticklish personal information (which sharing was induced by circumstances), not to savor any medical, physiological, or anatomic details, and not to use this text as a reason for mockery and persecution.


4. I (the reader) am warned by the author that, except for a number of obviously immoral (by definition) doctors' and medical staff's actions, other decisions and acts described in this "confession" are not subjected to hasty moral assessment because a) only experts can judge finally about their justification and fairness; b) explanations and vindications of other party are necessary. We also do not know to what degree the doctors were under an influence and direct power of police, Ministry of Immigration, and other enforcement agencies, political organizations, groups and persons - with their own ideological, economic, and propaganda interests, - and to what degree this influence impacted on their diagnostic conclusions and assessments of patient's state of health. Many of the documentary confirmed facts incontestably demonstrate that author's ideological stand (who's opposing to younger generation's transformation into zombie-biorobots with mobile phones on shoulders instead of heads; to electronic totalitarianism with its prison-like total video surveillance; and to the tyrannical political censorship) played nearly a major role in enraging the authorities and triggering the persecutions.


5. I (the reader) am warned that the author sees the main cause of the most dramatic (for him) events in the fact that the enforcement agencies and interested persons and groups managed to present him to the medical community as an individual incapable to evaluate his health condition objectively; as a health-consciousan (or hypochondriac); an extremist; a troublemaker; an individual obsessed with panic and alarm patterns; as a person, who is making unreal demands to the system of medical care - concerning his - allegedly - pseudo-maladies and exaggerated gravity of trivial indispositions. This smear campaign of defamation, scurrilous libel, and wicked calumny made impossible receiving an adequate medical care (and sometimes any medical help at all), and led to health undermining, numerous diseases, incidents, and unnecessary sufferings. Doctors also considered difficult to believe in continuous (not connected with each other) illnesses, with an interval of 4-7 days, sometimes rolling at the same time: as tsunami. They refused to believe in these sequences of illnesses' painful course, danger, and significance. This chronicle disproves such a prejudiced opinion, producing an incontestable evidence.


6. I (the reader) am informed that all negative remarks, characteristics, and facts' assessments belong only to the portrayal of criminal groups, extremists, and carriers of anti-humanistic, racist, and totalitarian ideology, but do not contain groundless generalizations and negative assessment of any country, ethnic group, or religion. The author is categorically against dismantling of any of the existing states, and against restrictions of the rights of religious congregations of any faith.


7. I (the reader) am informed that this edition partially presents the previous 2017 edition without any changes, and, thus, may not correspond to later view and opinions.


8. I (the English reader) am informed that some parts of the following English text of "The Punitive Health Care" - were translated from Polish, Russian, or French originals, and may contain primitive language, double interpretation, or puzzled meaning. Such confusing fragments should be compared with their originals in Polish and Russian languages (author's native languages) [2016-2017]; all controversial points must be resolved through such a comparison.


9. In the very last moment of this edition's make-up (April 2023), the author came across a description of so-called Havana-syndrome, and found same symptoms and complications, which he experienced when was attacked by an unknown remote weapon (3 Nov. 2005, 7 Jan. 2013, and 21 June 2016), and developed symptoms of post-microwave irradiation.


_________


CHAPTER 1.


2015.


JANUARY, 2015.


January 7, 2015, Wednesday.


Today, my family doctor refused my following requests:


1) to prescribe antibiotics due to next recurrence of urologic infection (hematuria, gematos., etc.);

2) anti-inflammatory due to acute left elbow's pain;

3) blood test on rheumatoid factor;

4) referral to bone and joints specialist;

5) to administrate Bone Density Scan (scan of the firmness of bones);

6) to carry out preliminary treatment for differentiation of arthritis, arthrosis, poliomyelitis, adjournment of salts, rheumatism, and other diseases of bones and joints;

7) to clarify the level of uric acid (if suddenly this is an adjournment of salts).


Instead, I got only a referral on elbow X-ray.


When I told that now the joints of hand manus also hurt, and asked to add X-ray of these joints, too, the doctor refused it. He examined the elbow and the hand, checked their individual and joint moving functions, but told nothing and did not state any assumptions concerning the nature of the disease.


On my words that - if the blood test did not confirm immunoglobulin-A vasculitis, it could suggest another dangerous autoimmune response, he said that - while I draw the conclusions on separate indexes, - he - as a specialist - considers all their interactions in general, and "on scientific basis".


And when I told that all symptoms -

1) strange light cough that passed only recently,

2) hemorrhagic rash,

3) kidney pain,

4) joints' pain,

5) intestines pain,

6) etc. -

match vasculitis, and that if this was, maybe, not vasculitis, then specifies generally an autoimmune response, he answered that we "closed" this subject.


After my complaints that the bleedings (hematuria, blood in other secretions from the same source) continue non-stop, he ordered me to lay down on the couch - and touched the lower section of my stomach. What he wanted to clarify there - lymph nodes, the state of the seed strands, or if the ureters are enlarged, or something else - is unknown, because he told nothing, and did not respond to my inquiries.


He paid more attention to the left side, where I really already feel for some time a dulled strange pain (I do not know how he guessed).


He also asked - whether cold and (or) heat helps from "arthritis", asked in the affirmative (with confidence) way, like he was sure that I tried these methods.


I answered that not only cold and heat do not help, but also aspirin and Voltaren ointment, which I bought in a drugstore on cash register - and began to take since December 2, 2014: none of those remedies help against arthritis.


When I was going home from the doctor, there was a police car of a "civil" type (i.e. without identification signs of police) - FGV44756 white Dodge Caravan-Crew - with the flasher - near my home. 2 men in leather jackets - the driver and the passenger - sat in the front seats. Not excluded that this car license plate number was false (removable). The "correct" number, is, possible, FHV44756.


After returning from the doctor, I found all my hidden markers-tags torn down; things in the hall, in the corridor and the kitchen - shifted; and steps traces on new-fallen snow on the balcony terrace.


Before leaving for doctor, I photographed as it everything was, and, having come from the doctor, I photographed everything again, comparing the photos: some objects were moved, and were not "on their" (not on former) places.


At that very moment, when I went - with the camera - to make pictures of the traces on the balcony terrace - the phone rang out. I was told: "we were mistaken the number".


This call changed my intentions: I decided to change the clothes at first. When I again returned to photograph the balcony terrace, it turned out that someone managed to sweep the snow on my balcony in these several minutes, having swept away the snow and having erased all traces, which - couple of minutes ago - were seen there.


Before leaving to the doctor, I left the drunk on the table, but - when now took a sip - I did not begin to swallow, and spat out everything to the lavatory basin, because the taste of tea was some bitterish and acid.


When - before going to bed - I undertook to brush my teeth - it turned out that the toothbrush gives some medicine. This taste and smell of medicine on the toothbrush not just somehow was hardly caught, but was sharp and hit in nostrils hard, and its taste literally filled all my mouth. I had to throw out the toothbrush and to take a new one.


Even if I would contact police, nobody would dare to call the experts and to carry out a toxicological - or as it is called there - analysis.


Not to mention that all my former statements and complains to police (when I was hit by car; when I was attacked several times by a gang of same 5 black youngsters; when I was attacked by 2 young white strangers; when an aggressive stranger with a knife attacked me for no reason, etc.): were just ignored.


Next day (or after 2 days?) the upper palate inflamed, and a sore developed there, and the whole week I could not eat normally, and 2 nights did not even was able to sleep.


I remember that, when I had something similar, and came to a dentist and to my family doctor with a request to take a swab test on microbiology culture (also on the upper gum) - both doctors made "uncomprehending" eyes - and did not even move. And they kept pretending that they do not understand - what is a swab test, until I had to leave.


See the requisition from my family doctor on elbow joint X-ray (which was written out on January 7, 2015). (See below)


CHAPTER 2.


January 21, 2015.


Plentifully, hematuria and blood in other discharges again.


January 26, 2015.


Approximately, by 13:30, I came to the radiological department of St.-Mary's hospital on abdominal ultrasonography: the procedure, which (after my numerous requests) was "indulgently" appointed by Dr. Morris.


Passed it at 13:54.


Usually, I had to wait always for this procedure at least more than an hour, and this time I was called somehow too quickly, so, that water, which I had with me and which drank already before the procedure - did not manage "to fall".


I told the physicians about it, but those answered that "everything is normal", and I understood it as "it'll go" so.


A curious detail: after I declared to the nurse technician (who performed the ultrasonography) about the groin pain (on the left side), and asked to call the radiologist, she left for about 5 minutes, and then told that the doctor "will come soon". But the doctor did not come, and I was told to leave. When I left the room, I was told again to wait for the doctor, but even by then the doctor did not approach me. Having waited for 15 minutes, I inquired where is the doctor, and only by then I was told that he "is busy", and "will not speak" with me "today".


January 28, 2015.


Ultrasound's report: see below (from January 28, 2015 (11:30). [On Dr. Morris's order on December 11, 2014 (fragment of this document):


What worse attention is that this was only a preliminary rapport, and I was never able to obtain the final report.


My own conclusions: it became obvious that we deal with an evident sign of the uterus abscess. The previous ultrasound's (2014, i.e. from few months earlier) rapport, which copy I handed over to Dr. Morris, reported under 50 cm3 (i.e. around 40 cm3) uterus. And now it was 73 cm3! The last findings have charged Dr. Morris with obligation to 1) administrate - urgently! - antibiotics; 2) prescribe - urgently! - Flomax (for prevention of lithiasis (uric stones formation, inevitable because of the urinal tract dysfunction); and 3) schedule a surgical procedure for restoring a normal urine flow.


In the following description of events, there is a report on Dr. Morris's reaction to this ultrasound's findings, who not only concealed these grave problems, but even attacked me (manifesting his aggressive behavior) for, allegedly, "too much worries". He was (by then) cynically denying any medical indications for antibiotics, alpha-blockers, and surgery, and literally said that the enormously enlarged uterus "means nothing"!


It is worth attention that in Dr. Morris's requisition-direction on ultrasonography (which he signed on December 11, 2015) he wrote by his own hand: Micro-hematuria ou qioss?? There is a question: why he had to mention "micro-hematuria" if he perfectly knew that it was not "micro-hematuria", but HEMATURIA, and - from time to time - real bleedings (macro-hematuria), sometimes - with bright red blood. So, what is such a term as "qioss"? I found no mention of "qioss" in medical dictionaries, even in special dictionaries of medical acronyms and terms. Possibly, it was a slip of pen (lapsus calami - I hope, not intended), and - actually - it had to be read: "gross". However, knowing - what happened later, and taking into consideration all outraged actions of Dr. Morris, we might be almost sure that it was not any "lapsus calami", but a conscious fraud. Perhaps, this note can shed light on the most important questions and doubts concerning Dr. Morris.


Now, see the copy of the cytology analysis (January, 22, 2015) - below:


Cytology's findings text's copy: "Benign reactive transitional cells".


Next cytology's page (see below) (January, 22, 2015):


Cytology's findings text's copy: "Atypical transitional cells. Cannot R/O (rule out) carcinoma".


These findings revealed even more serious problems than the ultrasound, which required an urgent medical intervention, and, first of all, further diagnostic procedures.


But Dr. Morris did nothing, concealed both tests' findings from me (his patient), and even aggressively confronted me for my demands to access the cytology's report, and (later) for my demands to explain the level of danger and the form of medical response to these findings.


If I would not obtain both reports from the medical archive (besides, I emphasize that ONLY preliminary reports were authorized for me, while my access to both final reports was blocked by the medical archive!), I would never know about these frightening and alarming findings.


This sharp uterus enlargement (from around 40 to the 73 cm3) in a very short time, transit cells and + atypical reactive transit cells: it was such an alarm at which further diagnostic procedures were obligatory, concerning suspected (by cytology) carcinoma, probable prostate's abscess, possible lithiasis, and a long acute infection, but Dr. Morris did not even summon me, and did not react to disturbing results of ultrasonography and cytology in any way.


These pathological changes were direct consequences of Dr. Brian Morris's refusal of antibiotics and of other medical and diagnostic measures, as Dr. Morris became the main obstacle in receiving antibiotics and the access to medical care in general. I believe that Dr. Morris has blocked my access to other urologists, prevented other doctors from prescribing antibiotics for me, and cut me off any medical help in general.


I believe that, since the second half of 2014, Dr. Morris has started an undeclared war against me, his patient, for pure ideological reasons, seeing me not as human being, but as his and his fellows-associates' enemy. I believe that Dr. Morris 1) might know about the content of my immigration file, or, at least, about my conflict with Immigration Medical Services (concerning a forged "tubercular" fluorography, etc.); 2) interpreted my defense of my patient's rights as an attempt on doctors' impunity and their privilege to manage medical help in the way that guarantees minimal or no control; 3) understood the accumulation of medical documents' in my hands (and my other attempts to be really informed about my own health problems) as a revolt against doctors' out of control way of work, and against the course of social segregation started by Harper-Trudeau governments, which did everything possible for restoring medieval range of social classes and estates, and, particularly, in the medical and housing spheres.


These two types of aspirin I took for some time, but without any significant effect (see the pictures below).


However, though both aspirins I took during an incomplete month, it is possible to assume that - if not this and other similar attempts of self-treatment (like Voltaren ointment, etc.), - then doctors' refusal to prescribe anti-inflammatories would lead to much more destructive consequences...


CHAPTER 3.


FEBRUARY, 2015.


February 4, 2015, Wednesday.


I went on reception to my family doctor. On my way to his office, our arrival (our car) was watched by a police officer from police vehicle 16-6 (9:08, in the morning).


On Guy Street - before reaching Rene-Levesque - the same police car 16-6 stood on the West side.


In a key point, a car of gendarmerie or special security service watched us closely.


My family doctor has refused to add "hand-wrist" to the requisition on elbow X-ray, having said that "for "now" the present X-ray" will show nothing.


This "for now" gave him away completely.


It is possible to assume that he already broke too many taboos and restrictions (concerning me), and now - also by having appointed an elbow X-ray, and, so, he already exceeded his authority concerning the restrictions for diagnostic procedures.


February 18, 2015.


Hoping to kill pain and to bring down the level of arthritis attack - in the middle or towards the end of February 2015 - I took aspirin extra-fort. Since even this type of aspirin did not give desirable effects, I ceased to take it (especially as blood tests detected an abnormally low level of MVP), and - approximately in a month - bought another aspirin, which - as was told in the summary - is intended to fight arthritis. In the beginning, it seemed that THIS aspirin helps, but I suddenly began to feel kidneys pain, which I connected with that "anti-arthritis" aspirin, and stopped taking it. (Perhaps it was a coincidence, but kidney pain stopped).


There are could be 2 reasons for damaging arthritis' origins: chronic inflammation and infection. One of them is definitely chronic urological infection, which treatment was sabotaged by doctors, and the second is non-doubtfully untreated caries, because in Canada dental care costs astronomical sums of money, and not covered by the Canadian and provincial health care plan.


Though one and another aspirin I took less than one month, it is possible to assume that if not this and other similar attempts of self-treatment (like Voltaren, etc.), then doctors' refusal to prescribe anti-inflammatory would lead to much more destructive consequences...


February 26, 2015.


Several days I have again an effect a hematuria and other "haemo".


February 27, 2015.


The fact that Dr. Morris ignored any of my descriptions of frightening symptoms, as well as the complaints about deterioration of my urological health, provoked me to compose a message to him in writing, which I sent by fax on February 27, 2018.


Only one and a half years later as though a veil fell down - and I understood how I fondly argued and acted in that situation. Of course, only experts can judge whether could transrectal ultrasonography and MRI (together) be able to reveal obstruction as good as cystoscopy.


But - even if it was possible - in actual practice just few doctors would direct me to these 2 medical exams - because there is a certain (hand-written or unwritten) order, according to which it was impossible neither to bypass a cystoscopy in my situation, nor to go round. Private and hospitals' radiology (medical imaging) departments sabotage any requisition for transrectal ultrasound, which is usually only available together with prostate biopsy procedure.


However, Dr. Morris is such an influential person in medical circles, and he has so much authority - that he could (if he wanted) to arrange all 3 possible exams: transrectal ultrasound, MRI, and CT scan (on compassionate ground; considering the tremendous damage, which was done to my health by him, by former doctors, and by the 1-st cystoscopy).


My naivety and idealistic vision has also prevented me from understanding that Dr. Morris is not a doctor, but an enemy, who will not hesitate to commit just any unethical action, from steeling or altering laboratory tests, to causing a significant damage to patients' health. I still perceived doctors, especially Canadian doctors, as angels without hatred and rage, despite all my negative experience.


Another interesting question is whether cystoscopy's complications, as well as Dr. Morris's policy, who closed for me an access to Flomax and other medications, to laboratory tests (concerning frequent urological infections), to antibiotics, and to diagnostic procedures - could lead to obstruction (if it was not present in 2012-2014 yet).


If both answers to these questions - are positive, then my messages to doctor Morris were not so naïve, and were not torn off from reality (if to forget about their form).


It is very disputable: that, if I would manage to "find a key" to Dr. Morris (to get along with him) before his attitude towards me has drastically changed in 2014, I could free myself from 16 years of torments. Moreover, it seems that Dr. Morris really was almost only doctor, who perfectly realized that there are some people in the medical system of Montreal, who are wishing to see me more likely sick and weak, than to restore my health. I am sure that he was in discontent with it, whatever his personal feelings towards me were.


Now, let's return to my fax to Dr. Morris, in which I wrote, among other things:


From Lev Gunin

[my home address] Montreal, Quebec H3K 1C7

Tel. (514) [my telephone Nr.]

Fax. (514) [my fax Nr.]


To Dr. Brian Morris, M.D. 5025 of Sherbrook Ouest,

Suite 455 Westmount (Montreal), Quebec H4A 1S9


Dear Doctor!

You must agree that stress is a source of health degradation, and - if so - your response to next questions can reduce my worries and provide a psychological relief.

Since I assume that doctors are "restricted" in providing therapy (see below), you do not have to take it personally.


1. During my last visit, you responded to my request for antibiotics that (literally) "You"re not allowed antibiotics any more". By what or whom, or why - I"m "not allowed", and why "any more"? [If there is a concern about resistance" development, isn"t it logical to consider refusal"s harmful consequences first? If there is an issue of non-acute infection, are not the abnormal biochemical components and significant bleeding, etc. should be interpreted as equal?]


2. When I told about disappearance of a) hematuria/hemasp-mia & b) blood trace in urine after antibiotics, you said that in some people "it just happens". Why to rule out scientific proof such as laboratory tests (combined with the objective signs of improvement after antibiotics) - and, instead, to employ ungrounded guesses?


3. You were also slamming me for doing "two identical" blood tests, stressing that the cost of each is around 500 CD.

Why to attack your patient if both blood tests were not issued by him? Why to ignore that these were different blood tests, for dissimilar reasons? Why to return (under such a doubtful excuse) one of above mentioned tests without a look? Why did you break off that blood test's copy (that I handed over to you) into peaces?


4. You sent me for cytology and ultrasound just because I strongly insisted, literally begged you "to do something" - "because "doctor, I am bleeding".

Why cytology & ultrasound had to be issued in the doorstep, on my persisting appeal "for help": who"s restricting the number and cost of treatment, diagnostic procedures etc.? Has it something to do with savings/austerity?


5. Because I am not allowed to speak during my visits, I am forced to ask now about transrectal prostate scan, MRI, and alpha-blockers to reduce its enlarged size.

Why not to consider transrectal scan without my request? What about alpha-blockers? I hope to have an access not only to Temulsin, but also to Flomax. (If a PSA test is an issue - alpha-blockers could be stopped for some time before blood test.)


[I consciously omit (Paragraph 6)]


7. There are (as I told) also: permanent & alarming flow reduction (sometimes retention), harsh pain associated with e. and d. [this phrase was removed due to the ethics and confidentiality considerations] of recurrent dysuria for days or weeks. It is hard to accept that such a combination of all (above mentioned) symptoms do not "deserve" to be diagnostically and medically approached (treated). (....) (......)


[I deliberately omit (Paragraphs 8-10)]


Yours truly - Leon (Lev) Gunin

27 February, 2015-02-27.


Further, in the same message, I mentioned simultaneous "general" urological-proctological symptoms, which descriptions Dr. Morris ignored during the 3 (or 3 and a half) years, and about his skepticism (and mistrust) to my words.


The list of symptoms, which Dr. Morris systematically ignored or denied, is the following:


partial obstruction, degradation of pressure (in combination with pain), sharp pain in connection with [here is the omission connected to the reasons of ethics and confidentiality], weeks-long recurrence (aggravations) of dysuria.


It was told also that Dr. Morris was ignoring symptoms, which brought up the consideration of prostatitis, ureteritis, funikulitis, and vezikulitis.


The main problem concerning Dr. Morris's treatment was that - from the first meeting - he saw not a real serious urological problem (in my case), but a "hypochondria", and it happened (by no means) not because his patient came on the 1-st visit to him with lots of former analyses and exams' rapports' copies, and with patient's own assumptions of the reasons of his troubles.


Dr. Morris is a clever person, and his prejudiced would never took him over, if there was no external source of this bias; or, in other words, some information in the hospital's system, in computer data or McGill university hospitals' network, or the story about me of some of his colleague doctor, from those who stand behind an initiative of undermining my health.


This bias did not help Dr. Morris to understand quickly that to what, and there passed 2 or 2,5 half years before he began to understand, how close I stood to the right diagnosis of my urological problems and how true were my assumptions and conclusions.


If not Dr. Morris's temper, which quite often won over him, he could understand from the very beginning that to what. But his acts and all his behavior were not ethically faultless.


Thus, he believed - from 2012 to 2014 - that I significantly exaggerate symptoms and gravity of the urological disease, and he did not trust my words and complaints. He was skeptical about such of my complaints as hematuria, urgency, interruption, stranguria, dyzuria, nocturia, cystitis, pollaciuria, etc.


He could easily verify whether it is possible to trust my words, my suggestions, and my complaints, by means of such simplest and reliable checks as uroflow, MRI, CT-scan, cytology, etc., but he appointed the first cytology only in 2015, and for the first time he started talking about cystoscopy - and began to insist on it - only at the beginning or in the middle of 2014.


This mistrust and disbelief - shown by Dr. Morris and other medics - forced me again and again to try "to reach" common sense of doctors, but it turned out only even worse - because stereotypes, bias, and prejudice are rooted in medical circles very deeply.


Here, too, I wrote to Dr. Morris (further in the quoted message) that the results of cytology and other analyses confirmed the justification of my concerns: transit cells mutation; PSA that - from the indicator 1.0 - sharply jumps sometimes up to 2.0 or 3.0 (which is insignificant or even very good for people of my age, but I was speaking about a special case, described in medical literature); hyperplasia, which jumped up from 40 to nearly more than 70 cm3 (almost twice!).


I, probably, should stop on it, but I continued, stressing that it happened because of the refusal of antibiotics and because of the mistrust to my (patient's) complaints, or, otherwise, because of the irresponsible suggestion that I am "hypochondriac"!


In the following discussions, I reminded that I always insisted on suggestion about the link between the recurrences of urological problems - and inflammation and joint pain, and, in particular, pointed it to doctor Morris in November 2014, mentioning also about other symptoms - typical for an autoimmune reaction, caused by a urological infection.


I wrote: "You told me that I have to address to other medical experts about it. Meanwhile, the last blood tests reflected sharp "global" change (not only noted by "tags"), which assumes confirmation of my hypothesis".


Further, I informed Dr. Morris that these "other medical experts" treat me as if they are under pressure, which purpose is to convince them of my alleged "hypochondria" - and not to trust my complaints and the description of symptoms.


Also, I gave examples of multiple refusals of rendering medical care to me: such refusals led to hardening (calcification) of the cyst on an old scar on my forehead, having blemished my forehead; I did not receive medical care when I was hit by car, and it damaged the blood vessels; and etc., and etc.


An hour later (27 February 2015) I sent an additional page to doctor Morris's by fax:


"Dear Doctor!

Will you trust in objectiveness of my complains and my description of an acute UTI infection if tests for microbiology/culture would reveal a bacterial infection? Will you consider it a grounded proof that my worries and concerns, and my description of annoying and dangerous urological problems and conditions are not a product of my "imagination" or "hypochondria", but a result of real untreated urological conditions?"


CHAPTER 4.


MARCH, 2015.


March 1, 2015.


Since the early morning - gripes in the bladder. Urgent current affairs held me till 18:00. It was already too late to go to laboratory with (written out by my family doctor) requisition.


March 2, 2015.


In the morning, I had to come to see Dr. Morris - at whom (after arrival of my fax from February 27, 2015) I, certainly, did not receive a warm welcome. Even his secretary, always friendly and objective, this time pouted.


I - once again - asked Dr. Morris to direct me to one more ultrasonography and to prescribe antibiotics; and, if it is possible - antibiotics of a broad spectrum.


Having ignored the second part of my request, he - after all - prescribed Cipro - but this prescription, firstly, was written out already too late, and, secondly, a number of previous courses of Cipro did not stop the following infections, and, so, did not solve the problem cardinally.


"Courteously" - considering my insistent requests to prescribe also Flomax, - he - after all - defiantly prescribed Alfuzosin, which - as I told him - gives side effects, so, I hardly will be able to use it. He, perhaps, deliberately prescribed Alfuzosin, because it is automatically covered by the governmental subsidies, and Flomax could be prescribed (in 2015) on the same conditions only by an amicable doctor. Saying that he is prescribing Alfuzosin, Dr. Morris has written "Xand", which is a medication appointed to treat mental diseases. When I saw "Xand" in the prescription, I suggested that it might be a generic replacement of Alfuzosin, but it was a wrong suggestion.

In the pharmacy, on my words (that I came to pick up Alfuzosin) the pharmacist - hesitating - at first gave me Xand (simultaneously explaining this medication's action), and only by then, realizing that this was a prescription by urologist, he telephoned somewhere (probably, Dr. Morris's office) - and replaced Xand by Alfuzosin.


I also asked to prescribe not one, but 2 alpha blockers, like Flomax and Finasteride (judging by my fresh records of that time: 1) relaxant, and 2) one that promote reduction of hyperplasia). (I emphasized what already declared in the fax - now orally again, - that the ultrasonography assumes a sharp enlargement for a short period from 40 to nearly 70,5 cm3, i.e. literally twice!) I also assumed that this is the direct consequence of neglect of my problems, refusal of antibiotics and diagnostic procedures (requested by me).


But, instead of (demanded by me) 2 alpha blockers, he defiantly prescribed only a relaxant - Alfuzosin (contrary to my numerous requests for Flomax).


Also by then, on March 2, 2015, I, taking advantage of the fact that - for the first time since 2012 - Dr. Morris does not shoots me down and allows me to speak, asked him directly: "What, in Canada you do not treat prostatitis at all, or you treat it, but only if a patient has a private insurance, i.e. for big money? And you don't treat the prostatic abscess? And you don't appoint a surgical procedure for dangerous hyperplasia and probable calcification with the outlet obstruction?"


While Dr. Pharan, in 2003-2004, boldly pretended that, allegedly, does not understand at all, what is prostatitis, and knows nothing about such a diagnosis (as "prostatitis"), then Dr. Morris did not do the same, and just turned a deaf ear to my question as though I did not pose this question at all. In the same way, he ignored my question about the treatment of prostatic abscess, dangerous hyperplasia, and calcification with outlet obstruction.


As for ultrasonography's assumption, Dr. Morris at first intended defiantly tearing the ultrasound's report paper to shreds, in front of my eyes, but, probably, having realized that it goes already too far, fatly crossed out the line about the enlargement size (in this document), keeping saying that "they have no right to do it", and "by means of the scan it is impossible to reveal the hyperplasia size". Dr. Morris so furiously crossed out the line "Enlarged uterus" that tore the paper.


From the very beginning, I asked Dr. Morris twice, if there is still hope that I can survive without a surgical procedure, but he ignored my questions, by frowning or by demonstrating that I am, allegedly, exaggerating the severity of my problems. However, on March, 2, 2015, he asked me - himself - about my theoretical attitude towards a urological surgery, without specifying the type of the surgery, its name, and why it may be needed. I answered that I am afraid of any surgical procedure because of some "unconventional" reasons, that I prefer a conservative method until it is still possible, and that I would chose non-surgical treatment - if it can still bring the success in restoring the full functionality and eliminate all the pathologies. However, I ADDED, if the surgery is inevitable, I am ready to adjust to it psychologically.

Dr. Morris said nothing to my words, and made no further comments.

Only 6 or 7 months later I realized that he merely mocked me, because in March, 2015, it was already certain - even for a lesser specialist than Dr. Morris - to figure out by then - that all conservative methods (which he refused until now) are exhausted. It means that, by then, Dr. Morris already moved up to the second stage of his sabotage, which aim was to inflict concrete serious harm to my health.


Beginning already with the 2-nd rendezvous, Dr. Morris actually ceased talking to me: he silently checked a sample in a jar with a "litmus" strip of paper (regarding an infection, blood presence, etc.), at the same time trying to hide from me a strip where colors have changed; "every second time" checked the uterus (absolutely silently, too; ignoring my questions); and immediately left the examination office not allowing me to open my mouth and to describe new or repeating symptoms, or to express my complaints about a dramatic deterioration, or to report about another acute sharp infection, or either to state my requests, or to ask to clarify something.


No other ways were left to me for asking questions and for describing symptoms (which Dr. Morris entirely ignored), except of during two (2) procedures mentioned above, or before each of them, or right at the beginning, when I just entered the examination room (Dr. Morris ceased to let in me in his main office starting from the 2-nd rendezvous).


I had to "pull out" literally each answer, as they say, with the pincers, repeating each question several times. One time or two, when - at the end of reception - Dr. Morris was busy with checking out the sample, and I, standing closer to the exit, than he was, tried to receive an answer at least to one of my questions, he opened the door and pushed me outside, showing the door from his office and not having said for all the time a single word.


If I used to stop at the doorway, he went straight on me, so, that I was forced to stand aside and to give way to him.


If, having roughly expelled me from the examination room, Dr. Morris appeared on the corridor behind me, he, who before was keeping silence and not responded to my farewell, suddenly threw to me - into my back - several words, saying that I must approach the secretary and to tell her that the doctor wants to see me in, let us assume, 5-6 months, or about something else, and I - as a polite person - had to turn around to face him, which provoked a resumption of my questions and requests, already at witnesses' eyes, and it - as it seems to me - Dr. Morris was deliberately arranging to humiliate me.


For all mentioned above reasons, I was forced to communicate with Dr. Morris in the doorway, or even in the secretary's room, where other patients were crowded, or even on the doorstep of not even the examination room, but outside of his office, where his other patients and strangers were sitting.


For all mentioned above reasons, I wrote him in my fax of February 27, 2015:


"You sent me for cytology and ultrasound just because I strongly insisted, literally begged you "to do something" - because "doctor, I am bleeding". Why cytology & ultrasound had to be issued in the doorstep, on my persisting appeal "for help" (...).


Everything, to a last word that he spoke out, he said kind of unwillingly, through clenched teeth, as though I have committed an inexcusable offense, "having forced" him to give me a reply.


I several times noted time, and it turned out that every time (during every appointment) Dr. Morris spent on me no more than 4-6 minutes (because he - literally in the doorway - silently handed me a jar, and, having checked a sample with a "litmus" strip, left me alone until I prepare for an exam (at this time probably completing the official reports or engaging with other patients), and then - after a routine exam (1-2 minutes) - left at once).


I noticed that he spent incomparably more time with other patients.


Another extremely important fact: after March 2, 2015, Dr. Morris practically stopped accepting me, despite my persistent calls to his secretary and numerous requests for an urgent rendezvous.


From March 2 to mid-November, 2015 - I could not get any appointment with Dr. Morris, though he perfectly knew and understood, how serious are my problems and how urgently their solution is expected.


On March 2, 2015, his secretary handed me Dr. Morris's business card with an appointed rendezvous to November 26, 2015 (at 17:10).


The business card of doctor Morris with the rendezvous for November 26, 2015, which is written out on March 2, 2015. (See the image below).


However, on the eve of this rendezvous, a new - next - recurrence of an acute disease have started - with a plentiful hematuria, sharp pain and "urgency", - so even a trip to Dr. Morris's office, rather not very far from my home (4 Metro stations with 1 transfer and 15 min. walking), and the expected waiting time in doctor's office - represented an impossible task for me and an additional torture. Then, my condition became so serious that I was not able to leave my home at all.


Therefore, I several times called the office of Dr. Morris once again - to specify whether this rendezvous was not cancelled, and left messages on his answering machine.


I also sent a fax to Dr. Morris's office with the same question.


As a rule, the automatic messaging machine or doctor's secretary calls days before, in a day or two to a rendezvous, reminding that on such date, in such time - patient has an appointment with the doctor.


However, on the eve of November 26, 2015, NOBODY called me with confirmation, and nothing remained - to me - but to stay home. I had a justified impression that my appointment was cancelled, and that, in general, Dr. Morris does not want to see me, and - for this reason - does not answer my calls and sabotage appointment's confirmation.


(On the same day, November 26, 2015, I called the office of Dr. Morris from my home and even from a payphone (when my phone suddenly stopped working [due to telephone line sabotage be Bell] during 2 hours, or rather badly worked); but nobody answered the phone and nobody called me back. (If someone called, I would see a lost call and could listen to a message, despite the phone line malfunctioning.) It means that, rather, nobody was in the office that day, and my appointment, most likely, was a fake).


Whether it is worth being surprised to the fact that, when, on March 2, 2015, I - in despair - asked Dr. Morris, "how can I live normal life, and what can I do about the need to run urgently each 15-20 minutes to the toilet", he answered: "Drink less liquids"?


Whether it is worth being surprised that - on my astonishment and outrage concerning his answer, when I asked him if he is deliberately advising me not to drink water for provoking lithiasis calcification and formation of stones in kidneys and bladder, and whether increasingly frequent and more and more plentiful hematuria indicates that stones already began to be formed, - Dr. Morris answered that, allegedly, under his assumption, I, supposedly, drink "too much water", and "from its pressure", "which is too big", originate the bleedings?


Whether it is worth being surprised to the fact that, when I asked Dr. Morris, how does he know that I drink too much liquids and why does he came to such conclusion, and how much is "too much": he had nothing to say, and kept silence?


Whether it is worth being surprised to the fact that all my attempts to transfer myself from Dr. Morris to another urologist were nipped "in the bud" - as it is possible to assume: at the initiative of Dr. Morris?


At the same time, I do not think that Dr. Morris wished to do any direct harm to me (as other doctors did), and, on the contrary, was in disagreement with the policy of the government (that was aimed to destroy health of people like me), but, however - in practice - he consciously provoked the formation of kidneys and bladder stones, and other serious consequences, by refusing rendezvous, tests, antibiotics, and surgical procedures, at the same time, having blocked me access to other urologists.


However, can we tell with confidence that Dr. Morris acted alone, when "did not release" me from his death grip, blocking my access to other urologists? Or, maybe, someone else, very influential persons, stood behind him?


Approximately, by 12:00, I came (by Metro) to St.-Mary's hospital laboratory, with the requisition of Dr. Rohan for blood-urine test.


In the registry window, I said that I have a requisition for 2 tests - blood and urine, - but would like to deliver this day only the urine sample, and for the second - for the blood test - I wish to come another day.

I was told: no problem, and received a requisition back - now with color marks: 1) yellow - that there was left only blood test, and 2) crossed out by blue color - the urine - that means "already done".


Besides, I was given one more sheet - page printout, - where the same was stated in printing.


I passed in turn approximately at 13:30.


I did not notice anything unusual, and - if I am not mistaken - the sample was carried away to the internal laboratory premises very soon.


March 3, 2015.


Again, I had hematuria, and etc. "haemo" (of average intensity) for several days.


March 4, 2015.


I passed the X-Ray of the left elbow at the private radiology VM-Med on Sherbrook street. Only 3 years later it became clear that some radiologies systematically distort the results of exams done for patients with the governmental (RAMQ-card) cover (i.e. patients, who receive this medical service "for free"), and objectively analyze - at professional level - only those scans (X-rays, ultrasonography, and so forth), which were paid in a private order, or covered by private medical insurance. The gravity of problems of patients, who receive VM-Med service "for free", are underestimated, and sometimes pathologies are ignored at all.


The requisition of doctor Rohan for left elbow's X-ray. Written out on January 7, 2015. (See above)


See below - left elbow's X-ray rapport, the whole document. March 4, 2015. (See above)


Copy of this rapport's text below:


Upper extremities: Left Elbow.

Indication: Pain x 3 Months.

No effusion. Degenerative change, fracture, or intrinsic bony abnormality is seen.

Impression: Unremarkable radiograph.


It is an astonishing remarkable "conclusion", after the recognition of the "Degenerative change, fracture, or intrinsic bony abnormality". "Unremarkable" means "without any pathological changes", which contradicts the findings. Such clear pathological changes were "erased" on paper by such a bureaucratic deception.


March 10, 2015.


When my family doctor and other doctors refused to administrate (or could not appoint, as a result of pressure upon them) anti-inflammatory, I took Meloxicam, which was prescribed to my spouse. This medication was not contraindicated to me, but was undesirable for several reasons, and, still, I had no choice. The jar with Meloxicam contained only the rest of the tablets, and, besides, I needed several courses of anti-inflammatory, or, in other words, I needed 3-4 weeks of the treatment. And, yet, this medication greatly helped me, and I am sure that - if not Meloxicam, - the damage to my joints and bones would be serious and irreversible. In other words, only my own initiative prevented inevitable serious consequences, which would provoke doctors' refusal to prescribe anti-inflammatory.


See below: Meloxicam, which I was forced to take unofficially because of doctors' sabotage


Jar of the Meloxicam which was prescribed to my wife. (In this photo a part of the enclosed paper back is visible). I began to take this medicine approximately somewhere on March 10, 2015, and the quantity of tablets was enough only for 5-6 days.


See above: Meloxicam. (Pack's sticker and a tablet).


APRIL, 2015.


April 3, 2015.


I visited my family doctor on April 3, 2015, again.


He said that he did not receive yet the x-ray report of my left elbow.


But - in the center of VM-Med radiology at the corner of Sherbrook and Guy, - the secretary showed (in the computer) the registered data: the report was sent by fax to Dr. Rohan - and the fax number was specified.


Then - whom to trust?


(Addition to the later edition: after a number of unethical manipulations in VM-Med, trust to this medical imaging laboratory disappeared as morning fog... However, it does not mean automatically that they did not send this X-Ray report to Dr. Rohan by fax. 2 times my medical documents used to disappear right in my family doctor's office, and twice unknown intruders have penetrated his office at night (surveillance camera was installed at office door after this incident).


Dr. Rohan told that he does not remember at all that he administrated an elbow x-ray for me.


Then I reminded that I was forced to postpone the X-ray, because did not wish to be exposed to radiation twice, and asked Dr. Rohan to add also a wrist X-ray in the requisition, but he refused.


Doctor only shrugged his shoulders.


I added that now, besides the left elbow and the wrist, the shoulder and the hip already hurt strongly.


However, instead of examining the elbow and the wrist (I complained that the wrist pain became especially intolerable), he felt the cervical vertebras, ordered me to turn my head left-right.


I asked the copy of the last laboratory tests.


Doctor allowed me to take photos with my pocket camera, but only of 1 page, because - when I was photographing the 2-nd page - he so artfully covered it with a piece of paper (which has nothing to do with the test) that I detected it only at home. What surprised me is that (judging by standards) - it was not a preliminary, but a final report (marked as "page 1 of 1" sent by fax), and that the "microbiology" section was completely missing. By ALL norms and standards, a "microbiology" sections, as a rule, are entered into page 2, and, thus, a complete urinalysis (as a rule (in McGill-affiliated hospitals) consists of 2 pages: "page 1 of 2" and "page 2 of 2". However, in THIS case, the 2-nd page was completely missing. If an infection (bacterial culture) was not found right away - then the laboratory should be waiting 2-3 days before issuing ANY rapport, and, in THIS case, they already sent this rapport by fax 24 hours after the sample collection, which, undoubtedly, indicates that a bacterial infection was present in the sample. Another mystery is the "second page", mentioned by my family doctor. Was he mistaken, mentioning about the "second page" mechanically, knowing that there must be a second page, or it existed indeed? And, if it existed, then, what was printed in it: that the microbiology is "missing"?


If he mentioned the "second page" by mistake, then, why he quickly covered some page by a "blank" paper - while I was taking a photo of the printout paper that he pulled out before?


Here (see below) is the page of the test's report, which I photographed in my family doctor's office on April, 3, 2015:


This test (see above) is - definitely - a fake. Shortly before the test, in Dr. Morris's office, the dipstick office test indicated ketones, proteins, nitrites, leucocytes (otherwise, Dr. Morris would not prescribe antibiotics!), and 1 (or 1,5) hours later all of them "disappeared" at ones!

Later, in May-June 2015, when I twice addressed to the medical archive of St.-Mary's Hospital, this (shown above) ur. test from 2-nd March 2015 was already none-existing. Instead of THIS particular document, the archive presented a fake "urine test" from 10-th March 2015 with the remark "the patient refused to provide a urine sample". (See (few pages) below). It means that this single page from 2-3-2015 has disappeared (was confiscated or destroyed, or made "classified"), too.

On March, 2, 2015, the sample was muddy, cloudy, turbid, and brown; and, in the report, it is indicated as "clear" and "straw"! Besides, the symptoms (pain, burning, itching, grips, etc.) also denoted an acute UT infection.

Also, the presence of blood (in the test's report) and erythrocytes, and the pH at the extreme height of the "norm" (in some of the medical documents, the norm is set to 6.5, or 7.0, not 7.5) suggests an infection, contradicting the other figures.


Thus, a real awkwardness is an absent of any infection's indication in the "urinalysis dipstick" (analyse physico-chimique) section.

First, it was mentioning "aspect - clear", which was not matching the truth (before carrying away the sample, I photographed it, and it was turbid-muddy).

Then it mentioned "color - straw", which is not a standard term for urine tests and sounds odd for medical documents. In all other laboratory documents, developed and signed by Julie St.-Syr (MDCM, FRCPC), this color is indicated by word "yellow", except of the urine test from November, 16, 2016, where the microbiology (bacterial culture) was missing again! Thus, it is not occasionally the same "straw" term appears only in 2 urine tests' rapports with similarly missing microbiology culture.

In the line "blood", the word "moderate" is followed by "_" (underline mark), which is unusual, and not present in any other test document. It evokes doubts that the blood presence was really "moderate".

So, the missing microbiology and all these unusual irregularities are indicating that this test's result was a fake report.

Plus, another evidence that this rapport was a fake, is the fact that 1 hour before the collection of the lab sample (same day, March, 2, 2015), the urinalysis dipstick by a special "litmus" paper strip at Dr. Morris's office indicated an acute infection (otherwise Dr. Morris, who refused antibiotics since autumn, 2014, would not prescribed Cipro same day, March, 2, 2015).


I already presented this prescription in my work, but I display in again (see below):


I repeat: Dr. Morris would never prescribe Cipro, if not an indication an acute and very aggressive infection, and this alarmingly contradicts the urine test report for sample from March, 2, 2015.


Instead of the 2-nd page of (2-nd March, 2015) the test, which always used to be a microbiology (bacterial culture), my family doctor pushed closer the next page (see below), simultaneously saying that this is the urine test's "2-nd page" (I guess that my family doctor was just mistaken, and automatically pushed a paper, which he took for the 2-nd page of the ur. test; in reality, he was not aware yet that the microbiological culture is absent; another bizarre thing is the presence of the requisition paper in his office, while, according to the logic, it had to rest in St.-Mary's Hospital) [it is also shown this requisition before later marks]:


See above: 1) The requisition for lab tests, which was presented in St.-Mary's laboratory on March, 2, 2015, for passing the urine test, on my family doctor's office table. (The left image). 2) The same requisition before 2-3-2015, without the later marks, made in the laboratory.


It would be very suggestible that the hospital, realizing that the bacterial culture test is missing, deliberately delivered this document "instead" of the microbiology (culture) test, if not the fact that the ur. test's result was sent by fax, and THIS document is the original.


So, it is just another unsolved mystery.


An idea that the microbiology culture test was not done because the urinalysis dipstick did not suggest an infection - does not work, because - in 2015 - the test for culture was executed ANYWAY, whatever shows the dipstick. All lab tests were performed literary to the letter of the requisition.


It means that the test for bacterial infection was definitely (indeed) MISSING.


On Friday - April 10, 2015, - when I came to my family doctor's secretary with the repeated request to print out for me (or to allow me to take photos) the copy of the 2-nd page of this urine test's report (2-3-2015), she - as well - used a trick to fool me out, having given - instead of what I asked for - the blood test from January 7, 2015, which copy I already had...


However, it also remains an unclear conclusion, because such actions don't match the nature and all the good deeds of this decent and moral woman. What, if, under the pressure of work and the presence of other patients, she just had no time and no ability to concentrate?


On my request to prescribe anti-inflammatory, my family doctor responded by his refusal again.


He refused also to refer me to a specialist osteopath and to issue a wrist X-ray.


Perhaps, the motive of the refusal was his colleagues' (first of all, Dr. Morris) demands to comply, as they were eager to cover up their medical crimes.


When, for years, I was repeating that the arthritis started in connection with the 1-st acute urological infection back in January 2001, and the refusal of antibiotics (and, that, since then, the urological problems are fueling the arthritis), I had no intentions to accuse medical workers of medical crimes: I merely believed that emphasizing this connection is crucial for producing a right dialog and right diagnosis, which, in turn, is a crucial condition for receiving a correct treatment for arthritis. I tried to explain to doctors that chronic inflammations, like urological problems and teeth caries, are origins of arthritis, which sooner or later will doom me for a wheelchair.


Concerning the refusal of antibiotics, I must stress that not only blunt-bold refusals, but also cunning prescriptions of non-correct antibiotics, or prescriptions of inadequate dose of Cipro and not on right terms' length (for 3, 5 or 7 days only, for fighting an acute and long-lasted infection!) contributed to 14-years-long (already in 2014) UT infection, while bringing only short periods of relief and poisoning (in vain!) liver and other organs, and generating potential cellular (genetic) damage and aging acceleration. Such a coordinated and unusually cruel treatment could happen exclusively on the initiative of the Federal Canadian government and the most sinister circles of the British Empire's monsters.


However, as it turned out later, they perceived my claims as accusations, and started to eliminate or to prevent any evidence of this connection (between the initial UTI and the arthritis), regardless of the further damage that this cover up is doing to my health.


While the treatment of urological complications of the medical sabotage back in 2001 pointed directly to the government, its agents (Immigration officers), and particular doctors (affiliated with Immigration Canada, or - also - members of Immigration Medical Services), the untreated tooth caries (and other health-damaging mistreatments) - is directly connected to brutal Canadian practice of social apartheid-segregation and deprivation of low and medium-income people of dental and other essential medical care, because the gangster-style payments demands for dental treatment made it inaccessible for great majority of Canadians, and the government has no free dental plan for low-income patients, taking side of the medical and corporate mafia.


Now, my family doctor, possibly, refused a wrist X-ray - because, if deformation of the elbow was already quite obvious, then the deformation of the wrist was still in a development stage. Therefore, if there would be an x-ray BEFORE any visible degradation, and (later) an x-ray of already obvious bone-joints deformation, then, a comparison of these 2 medical images could become a confirmation to the fact that the irreversible changes happened during THIS given period of time. In other words, an evidence of my claims (that the lack of concrete diagnosis and denial of anti-inflammatory will contribute to bones-joints' damage) would be there, and would blame particular doctors personally.


On my repeated request to prescribe anti-inflammatory, Dr. Rohan responded by another refusal without indicating the reasons.


CHAPTER 5.


April 7, 2015.


One of the doctors (speaking French) one day threw in a low voice: "Un personne competent venu parle avec moi au sujet de Vous". But he did not supply any further details.


For a number of reasons, I did not mention yet another astonishing phrase, which Dr. Morris throw to me: "For a person with wrong ideas, you are treated in Canada too well". (Unfortunately, I don't remember his exact expression literary, because noted his statement in Polish, as I often do, recording some events not in English or French, but in German, Polish, and Russian languages. Then, it was entered into my report of the outraged "medical" events in Russian; thus, here it is presented not by the original phrase, but by its translation from Russian and Polish records).


His intonation did not leave any doubt that doctor Morris stated it with irony, but this irony can be interpreted doubly: as the fact that he agrees that I am treated in Canada "too well" (without the figurative sense), or - on the contrary - as the fact that he understands this "too well" as "too bad", thereby warning me about danger to remain in Canada, and, thus, ignoring (or having no clue) that I have no place where to go, that I have no exit, no other citizenship, and no financial resources for even a temporary departure to other country.


However, it is impossible to understand what specifically stood behind his phrase and what is his personal attitude (it is impossible by definition).


In deeper analysis, the fact that he actually called me an "ideological enemy" is evident: not an idea-based, or spiritual, but namely "ideological". Such - an ideological - enemy: this is, for example, a radical Islamist for a radical (reactionary) American Protestant, i.e. it represents a reflection of fight of ideas within the religious discord; or a communist for a fascist; etc. Supporters, for example, of aggressive atheism, or adherents of satanic cults also can see "an ideological enemies" in "normal" people.


However, it is possible that I incorrectly interpreted the term "a person with wrong ideas" (in Dr. Morris saying) as "an ideological enemy" whereas it is more correct to call such a characteristic "an ideas' adversary".


Even more seriously, than I - close in the tracks (right after the events) - believed, the last part of this statement may be perceived: "you are treated in Canada too well". Not "in medical institutions", but "in Canada" - I was (as an "ideological enemy" (WHOSE "enemy"? - here is a question!), supposedly, according to doctor Morris, treated "too well". But the word "treated" can be understood not only as "to treat" (medically), but also in a broader sense - as "to approach" or "to tolerate": that assumes either a desire to punish, or, on the contrary, Dr. Morris's disagreement with a policy of taking repressive measures against people with "such" ideas, including (if to extrapolate meanings) the refusal of medical care.


Not occasionally, I stressed in the preface that this work is more likely about the relationship between a creative person - and cynical, pragmatic, egoistic, and extremely rational society, than about politics, social segregation, or medical crimes. However, the saga about such drama presents here a general sense, while in all the details this work is an indictment of war crimes (politically-motivated medical crimes): medical crimes, political persecutions, hidden totalitarism, and police-state oppression, which uses the health care system as a punitive tool against dissidents, against all "unwanted" people (for example, native Americans; or origins (natives) form particular countries, which became pariahs for Canadian regime), or against so called "social ballast" (alcoholics, elderly, unemployed, homeless, handicaps, chronically sick, etc).


And, still, this work is carrying a touch of the eternal drama of spiritual and idealistic conflict between an artist (creative person) - and an unjust society. It explores the differences in creative peoples' behavior - and the behavior of the "ordinary" persons.


An "ordinary" ("everyday") person would run away from a doctor, who - at first - accused his patient in "plundering" Canadian state because he is doing "too many laboratory tests", then said that "antibiotics are "not allowed" to this patient "any more" (ever?), and - then - said that this person - is an "ideological enemy"...


When I - finally - left Dr. Morris forever, I passed through, so to speak, revaluation of his personality several times, and, after all, came to a final conclusion that he cannot be judged on purely rational - logical - principles. Not only because he is a difficult and contradictive personality, and, apparently, a famous and influential doctor, but also because, if we "demonize" him - it leaves too many white spots.


The tragedy of mine "doctor-patient" relationship with him has developed - at first - because he did not trust me, until he became sure of sanity and correctness of my perceptions, claims and complains, but, because of his mistrust, I began to doubt more and more in him. I lost (did not noticing) the moment, when he started to accept my observations and conclusions, and I kept being suspicious. I believe that the principle reason for such an outcome originated from some deceptive and politically motivated discreditable information on me in the governmental and medical sources, which Dr. Morris used to know. Therefore, the main guilt of triggering my tragedy is shared by Immigration Canada, foreign regimes and embassies, and one (or two of them?) pseudo-ethnic lobby in Canada, medical bureaucrats, and the oppressive Harper-Trudeau regime.


It is no wonder that - when I addressed with the problem of bones-joints inflammation and intolerable pain to 3 other doctors, one of them (my family doctor) said that I just "sit on the computer too much" (without specifying the source of his information), another doctor referred to "1 step in a time", and the 3-rd simply expelled me from his office saying that "other patients are waiting" for him (it leaves a conclusion that I am not a patient?!). So, any of these 3 doctors did not even examine me.


When (since December) I started to demand 1) prescription of anti-inflammatory; 2) a referral to specialist; 3) blood test on rheumatic factor - all 3 demands were refused by several doctors. One doctor whispered that I, probably, have enemies in the "college of medicine" (there is such a Rockefeller North American organization that controls all activity of doctors - from practice and certifications to medical licenses).


So far - without treatment (from November to April) - 2 joints began to deform, at the same time causing intolerable pain; the 3-rd - left shoulder - already began to be ill.


If - in the nearest future - I do not receive any medical care, it threatens by disability.


It will be difficult for me to work on the computer keyboard, to play piano...


Meanwhile - right on New Year's holidays (that reminds the mockeries of Immigration department) the house administration sent a notice that will carry out "prevention against bugs".


CHAPTER 6.


April 9, 2015.


"With fight", my family doctor, after all, prescribed Naproxen, but only after 6 months of my persistent demands, when some damage to the bones was already obvious, and only for 1 week and, then, for another week of 1 time renewal. At first, I thought that this prescription is for 1 week only, ignoring the mark for 1 renewal. To mitigate, to slow down, and to stop such a long arthritis attack, it was necessary to administrate Naproxen or similar medication for a longer time, and, secondly, not after half a year of refusal, but when it was needed. A valid for one occasion course of Naproxen - is the same as a grain to an elephant!


Later (6 days later) my wife has told me that the figure "1" on the medication jar means not "1 time", but a possibility of 1 time's renewal of medication (receiving this medicine totally 2 weeks (1 more week). It would mean that my family doctor has administrated Naproxen adequately enough, because 2 weeks-long course is a minimally appropriate decision. I have no doubt that my family doctor could not prescribe Naproxen earlier because he certainly was under the pressure from the medical community and medical administration.


When Dr. Krasny denied Naproxen, my family doctor, who knew about Dr. Krasny's decision, could not contest the verdict of specialist rheumatologist. He would risk to lose his medical license. And, secondly, he already knew that, if he, contesting all other doctors' refusal to prescribe this or that medication, nevertheless, prescribe it for me - the pharmacy, as a rule, sabotage its delivery.


Of course, even 2 weeks of Naproxen - at so long arthritis attack (from November, 2014, to May, 2015) - it looks as a "handout", but, nevertheless, 2 weeks are better, than 1, and, after 1 week of taking Naproxen, I went to pharmacy for another week-long renewal.


Astonishingly, they said - in the pharmacy - that it is not permitted for me to have a 2 weeks-long course of Naproxen (i.e. more than 1 course for 7 days), and refused to give me one more packing. I tried to challenge this sabotage in vain, because the pharmacist woman has insisted that the prescription was for 1 week only. What has happened? Maybe, the doctor called - and cancelled the 2-nd course? Or I came for the 2-nd "dose" after a break exceeding the "determined"? Or, maybe, my wife was wrong assuming that the digit "1" means an additional jar (1-time renewal) of medication? Anyway, if even so, the pharmacy had to contact my family doctor, and to inform him that his patient is demanding an additional week of Naproxen course, but they denied me the renewal resolutely, which was already strange by definition.


However, later I carefully studied the rules and laws, and medical protocols, and, according to all norms, the Naproxen was indeed prescribed for 2 weeks. The conclusion was very frightening. The pharmacy had no rights to stop giving out this medication, prescribed by the doctor.


The prescription paper itself (see the photo below) testifies that my family doctor prescribed Naproxen for 2 weeks, encircling the digit "1" in the line "repeat" ("renew"), which means: "Repeat 1 time".


Pharmacy's obligation, according to the law, was to issue (to release for me) 2-week Naproxen course, and, by stopping the course of medication, the pharmacy or its particular employer (by her own initiative) committed a medical crime. However, it happened not the 1-st time, and not in this pharmacy only. The next question is the level of sabotage, or, in other words, was it an order of pharmacy's administration, or a personal initiative of pharmacy's worker, who works for enforcement agencies or for foreign governments?


The supposition that in every pharmacy is working at least 1 enforcement agencies' agent may be right, because the weird stoppings of medications in all 4 pharmacies were executed always by the same 4 persons. For example, in one of these pharmacies, it was, for years, a medium height, massive complexion, white Quebec women. If we could know, who in the enforcement agencies or in foreign embassies gave her an order to sabotage the course of anti-inflammatory, we could know, who was responsible for many of other terrorist crimes.


By the term "enforcement agencies" I also mean hospitals, clinics, and private medical firms, because all people of medical profession became in Canada the same category of agents as policemen, secret services agents, or death squads' members. In the societies, in which doctors treat only the privileged patients, and doom other patients to death, they are already part of the punitive institutions. But in the modern societies (which are copying the practices of Hitler's regime), where doctors may be forced to participate in the killings of "unwanted" people by euthanasia, all medical workers were made by the governments potential murderers. From the most humanism-based profession, the medical profession has undergone a dramatic shift to become one of the most anti-human profession.


Now, let's go back to the events in April, 2015.


The sabotage of the treatment and medications against arthritis is only one part of the picture.


Similar bewilderment causes invariable refusals on my request to direct me for laboratory blood-urine analysis for hyperuricemia identification or ruling out.


From the very beginning of the arthritis attack (i.e. since November, 2015), I was asking Dr. Morris and my family doctor to include the test for hyperuricemia in the requisitions of blood-urine tests (because each return of a urological infection is steadily followed by arthritis), and to carry out the differentiation between crystallization and calcification: and then I will know at least how to carry out the self-treatment.


However, my family doctor did not comment on my suspicions on adjournment of salts in any way, as well ignoring also my suspicions on calcifying tendinitis and a danger of calcific stones formation in the bladder.


Though I also emphasized that - for the sake of indirect confirmation - it is necessary to see the result of such analysis. [Gout (crystallization), or pseudo-gout (calcification) are connected to the level of uric acid.]


An additional (but a very improbable) hypothetical possibility is that my family doctor contacted the pharmacy - and stopped Naproxen after 1-week course. That's why the following reasoning has only a theoretical value.


Of course, Naproxen in half a year after an evident beginning of arthritis attack is an obvious excess (I mean: that beats everything). (I enclosed double sense into this phrase: against the background of the bans-taboo on my treatment, my family doctor put himself under a risk, after all having appointed Naproxen).


Still, one week course of Naproxen leaves too many questions.


If it was a preliminary checking-testing prescription before appointing a 2 week course, after which doctor might prolong the prescription, then, at such "deal" (if it was just a "verification" of its efficiency), the doctor had to warn me about this, and had to order to contact him - and to report how this medication works.


If such a short course had something to do with possible medication's side effects, my family doctor had to mention that.


But he never told me that such a short course of anti-inflammatory was connected to some risks to my health, or that a longer course was contraindicated. This enforce the suggestion that he never called the pharmacy and never stopped Naproxen.


So, because I know him as a compassionate person and top-class doctor, I guess that it was the System that forbid him to administrate anti-inflammatory for me.


Therefore, it is very unlikely that, after already setting his mind on a potential conflict with the government by prescribing Naproxen, and already violating a supposed ban, he did not want to deepen the conflict, and stopped the medication after prescribing a longer course.


If Naproxen was denied during whole half a year, and then was given only for 1 week due to some risk factors (for digestive tract and cardiovascular system) - then why the doctor, who always explained his actions and opinions, told nothing this time? Why he prescribed Naproxen as if he did me a favor? And, well, further - pharmacy's refusal to repeat the medication: what stood behind it or who stood behind it? If even the digit "1" means "1-week only", they had to call my family doctor, and to tell him that his patient demands a renewal.


See below: the prescription of Naproxen (Dr. Rohan, April 2015).


The prescription on Naproxen on April 3, 2015, for 1 week and for 1-time renewal (for 14 days). (See above). It is clear that Dr. Rohan prescribed Naproxen for 2 weeks, not for 1 week, and, thus, the pharmacy stopped this medication in the style of criminals, without even explaining the reason.


The jar of Naproxen (April 3, 2015, for only 1 week). (See below).


Evidently, when I received the 1-st weekly (containing 7 tablets) jar of Naproxen on 9 Apr. 2015 (Thursday), the sticker indicated "1 time renewal". However, when I came to the pharmacy on 16 (or 17?) of April, I was denied the second weekly doze (7 "additional" pills).


[My explanation, why this anti-inflammatory, which was prescribed on April 3, 2015, was received in the pharmacy only on April 9, 2015. I don't remember exactly this particular case, but, as a rule, here are few typical reasons-examples: 1) the pharmacy did not give out Naproxen under a pretext that they do not have it right now, or pretended that there were other reasons; 2) due to acute arthritis, I was not able to go to the pharmacy myself (we were not aware of free delivery, or it did not exist in 2015 yet), and my close ones had no opportunity to go for it until 9 of April; 3) I don't remember about Naproxen, but, sometimes, I was charged even for medically-necessary medications, and, sometimes, I could not take them in the pharmacy, because simply had no money...]


So, Dr. Rohan's periodical refusals to prescribe essential medications are seen in a different light if we take into consideration pharmacies' interventions, when the pharmacies used to sabotage medications' delivery, making medications inaccessible for me. If Dr. Rohan knew that I will not get the remedies anyway, in spite of the prescription, he had no reason to risk losing his doctor's license for nothing. By the very fact, whose prescriptions were sabotaged by the pharmacies, and who's prescription were not - we can judge, who among the doctors is an honest and decent person, and who is a conformist and collaborator, responsible for government's crimes.


Medications, prescribed by Dr. Rohan, Dr. Krasny, Dr. St.-Jacques, Dr. Zast (Jast), Dr. El-Hackim, Dr. Piche, or Dr. Pushie, and by some other doctors, were sabotaged (from time to time) by the pharmacies; however, the pharmacies did not sabotage medications, prescribed (for myself, or not for me) by such doctors as Dr. Brian Morris, Dr. Chrissy Paraveskopolous, Dr. Debora Silberberg, Dr. Steven Herskovits, Dr. Chirgwin German, Dr. Makeda Semret, Dr. O. Sprull, Dr. John Patrick Rowen, Dr. Sejean, Dr. Girair Basmadjian, Dr. Pierre Brais, and others. This division mark and underline the difference between two different type of doctors. Another division also split the conformist doctors into 2 different groups, dependent of their actions and their true nature.


These conclusions slightly open a "mystical" curtain above the secrecy of the modern Canadian policy concerning the hidden different approach to the medical treatment of privileged and non-privileged citizens: the policy, which restored a very similar approach of the slave-owning epoche in the British empire. It corresponds to the restoration of the monarchial system, of the medieval classes and class prejudice, and the attempts to reanimate the medieval British empire as a sovereign re-subjugated Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and USA (as not just de jure, but also de facto vassals of the British Royal family), together with all the vassals of the vassals, like European and other puppet regimes.


A similar refusal met my demand to prescribe 2 sorts of so-called alpha blockers. After years of refusal, Dr. Morris, finally, prescribed a laxative medication - Flomax, - but replaced it by its generic analog Alfuzosin, despite my objection. I told Dr. Morris that Alfuzosin is contraindicated to me due to its side effects, which the original Flomax never caused in me. I repeatedly asked doctor Morris to administrate Flomax, which was already prescribed for me before I became patient of Dr. Morris (who - by then (end of 2012 or 2013) - refused to renew it, and was refusing Flomax till 2015), but Dr. Morris did not want to change his decision.


Besides, instead of "Alfuzosin", Dr. Morris has prescribed Xand, which is a completely different medicine (a psychiatric drug), so, I had to wait long time before receiving Alfuzosin in the pharmacy. According to medics' opinion, Dr. Morris very clearly wrote "Xand" in the prescription, which (if to believe these medics) is a medication for psychiatric patients.


The same happened with my request to appoint a course of broader action antibiotics. (See more complete description and an explanation of this incident above, for April 22, 2015).


After several months of bold refusal, on my invariable requests, Dr. Morris, finally, did me a "favor": and prescribed Cipro...


For a long period of time, my assumption did not go beyond a supposition that Dr. Morris did this incredibly unethical act (prescribing Xand, a psychiatric medication) for simply dropping a hint about my alleged "inadequate personality", symbolically pretending that all my demands of REAL medical treatment are merely a product of my hypochondria, and, thus, to justify his refusal of lab tests and antibiotics (when they needed in periods of acute UTIs), Flomax, surgery, etc. However, I wrongly excluded a likelihood that he planned to inflict an actual bodily harm and destroy my psychic by prescribing a harmful (for people without serious psychiatric problems) medication that I don't need, and which also could be contraindicated for me. Xand (if it is really a psychiatric drug) could - by its action and side effects - change my behavior, reactions, personality, and so on, turning me into a mentally impair person, and, by using this dirty trick, a bunch of medical criminals could pretend to "prove" my "mental inadequacy".


Besides, Dr. Morris refused to prescribe another type of alpha-blockers, which could be effective against the BPE (hyperplasia) and could (theoretically) restore my health without a surgical intervention. I was asking him to prescribe something "like Finasteride" since 2013, and he always refused the prescription.


See below: Dr. Morris's prescription of Xand instead of Flomax. While telling me that he is prescribing Flomax, he, actually, was writing "Xand".


See below: Alfuzosin, instead of Flomax, which I demanded from Dr. Morris. I told him that I have an adverse reaction to Alfuzosin - and not able to take it. I received a strange explanation in the pharmacy: allegedly, Dr. Morris, who - at first - prescribed Flomax - changed it for Alfuzosin the next day.


Alpha-blocker - Alfuzosin - that I received in the pharmacy instead of Flomax (which I asked from Dr. Morris). Photo: April 2015.


April 10, 2015.


In the morning, I came to my family doctor's secretary - and asked again for a permission to copy the 2-nd page of the last urine test - urinalizis's report (for March 2, 2015).


She pretended that gave me what I asked for (and I could photograph this document); however, in fact, it was not the 2-nd page of the urine test, but one of the previous blood tests. I did not begin to argue with her, especially as the waiting room was full of people. I understood that they persistently hide from me the complete printout of this analysis result (for March 2, 2015), or something is wrong with this report anyways.


In the same morning, after my family doctor's office, I went to St.-Mary's hospital's laboratory, where I passed a blood test with the same requisition as for urine test on March, 2, 2015 (a part of this blood test's report later disappeared, too).


I will remind that I already handed over "the first component" of the analyses on this requisition on March 2, 2015.


Once again, I will retell the key facts.


Since autumn, 2014, when I had just another recurrence of an acute UT infection (one of dozens since 2001!), I demanded antibiotics from Dr. Morris, and he was refusing antibiotics for many months.


This time, the acute urological infection has devastated my body and my life longer than ever before, and, after the refusal of antibiotics by my family doctor, by Dr. Morris (the urologist), by 5 doctors in walk-in clinics, and by one doctor in CLSC, I, finally (February 2015), told Dr. Morris (who pretended that don"t trust my complains about the infection) that - if next urinalysis will discover a dangerous bacterial infection (like entherococci), it will prove a severe mistreatment of my serious health problem and of the damage to my urinal tract in consequence.


Right after my conversation with Dr. Morris, my family doctor (February, 2015) issued (for me) a requisition for a complete blood-urine test. This requisition was dedicated to a future outbreak of urinal infection; it enabled me to go for this urine test exactly and only when the next recurrence of an acute infection is obvious.


I was already living with an acute urinal infection for months now, but some days it presented itself even more aggressively, when this acute infection used to become even "more acute".


On March 1, and in the early morning, March 2, 2015, having felt gripes in the bladder, I went to St.-Mary's laboratory. By then, I "did not complete" both analyses (blood-urine) in the same time on this requisition, since refused to pass the blood test simultaneously, and put it "on hold" - "away for later" (I knew that it can be done, and already did the same twice with no difficulties; besides, the registration nurse told me "no problem", and - so - the blood test was delayed).


The reason for this postponement was that only on March 2, 2015, I discovered that the rheumatoid factor and some other components, which my family doctor promised to include (to indicate), and which could shed light on problems with joints-bones, are not included into the Complete Blood Count.


I could mark - myself - these components by additional handwritten birdies directly in the requisite (where only complete hematologic analysis - Complete Blood Count - was checked), but, unwilling to commit such an unethical act, I decided to go and to ask my family doctor to add more components - like rheumatoid factor, - and, therefore, on March 2, refused to pass blood test, having said that I will come in other day.


By then - on March 2, 2015 - the requisition, on which I passed "the half" of the analyses, was returned (given in hands) to me, where they underlined by yellow felt-tip pen the remained analysis (blood), and crossed out the urine analysis (having marked thereby that I already handed over a sample for it).


Beside the returned requisition with additional comments, they printed out for me also an additional sheet, where it was also specified that I completed the urine test on March 2, 2015, and that I needed to come now only for blood test.


When, on April 10, 2015, I, having waited for my turn, handled these 2 papers in a registration window, the registration nurse significantly exchanged glances with her neighbor, and then - with the standing there (behind her back) female supervisor, and, despite the fact that it was specified in both documents that I already passed the urine test, she said that I have to do the urine test again. On it, I told that I already handed over a sample on March 2, 2015, and, in order to avoid confusion and misunderstanding (that nothing should be mixed) - I will not do an additional urine test, and going to pass ONLY the blood test.


I was already taking antibiotics by then, and so, a repeated urinalysis could not detect a bacterial infection, and I did not want to do a useless test.


In addition, the remark "the patient to return for blood tests" was entered into the computer database and was even printed in the non-complete (with missing microbiology!) urine test from 2-3-2015, and every member of the medical staff was, certainly, aware about it. It means that the authorities so intimidated and corrupted the conscience of young Canadians that any one of them now became capable to comply, and to become an accomplice in committing any government crime. And, still, the ordinary Canadian preserved, at least, some remains of the conscience, because, finally (running forward) they allowed me to pass the blood test, but, however, other Canadians then destroyed 11 of 13 blood test result pages...


The women have exchanged glances again, and - after this - the registration nurse started to insist on a repeated urine test. Seeing that I hold the ground, they burst all together, interrupting each other, and - if I correctly understood - wanted to tell that, without a repeated analysis, I "should not have the blood test". And, nevertheless, their hands - in contradiction to their words - passed me all papers, which are needed for the blood test, having attached to them the coupon of the waiting line number.


In the sample collection room, a black nurse also tried to put the same condition and to force or persuade me to do the urine test again (which I already did on March, 2, 2015), but I resolutely refused, and she gave out.


So, on April 10, 2015, I passed only a blood test.


On the same day, I tried to contact the administration of the laboratory to find out what happened to my urine analysis from March 2, 2015, but - at once - understood that it is a deadlock way. Then I went to the medical archive, but there they refused to give any references, and said that the copies, allegedly, are not issued to patients, whose doctors don't work in this hospital (it was an imprudent lie).


See below: blood-urine test, from 2 March - 10 April, 2015.


Copy of one of 13 pages (number 8) of blood test from April 10, 2015 (see above). (All 13 pages were sent by fax to the office of my family doctor). Here it is visible that totally there must be entirely 13 (!) pages, but - in my file - my family doctor (who allowed me to take a photocopy of only this and one more medical documents) had exclusively this single page!


Later, I could recover another page, with Immunology section; thus, only 2 pages of 13 (!) survived, except one more (which appeared [and, probably, was added] later) - where it was told that (on April 10, 2015) I supposedly refused to deliver a urine sample though the sample was collected and taken to the lab - on this requisite - on March 2, 2015. There is a lawful question: where are other pages, what happened to them, and what was in them? Running forward: even after addressing to ombudsman, I did not receive the missing pages. See below: The Immunology section.


If to shift the attention to blood test indicators (see 2 pages of blood test above), there are even more questions. Low (abnormal) hemoglobin; the low percentage of red blood cells (HCT Ht); and low indicator of erythrocytes: it is an obvious anemia, an alarm signal obliging doctors to take IMMEDIATE actions.


Anemia can indicate bleedings (that, in turn, once again positions the note "MICRO-hematuria" and mistrust to my words about a plentiful hematuria in Dr. Morris's reports and requisitions as mockery and sneer); blood cancer (failure of marrow function); rectum cancer; and another 2-3 not less ominous reasons.

However, not only the doctor, who administrated this analysis and received its result from the laboratory, refused to act and to inform his patient about new and never before manifested abnormalities in blood formula, but also other doctors, who received the copy (from me) of this lab test, did not utter - after its study - a word.

The copy of another (of 13 of sent by fax, except of the 8-th) from only 2 survived pages (together with the false official report oh, allegedly, not made blood test - the 3rd) of the lab test from April 2 and 10, 2015, is also worth our attention. Perhaps, it is rather a strange display of the indicator of rheumatoid factor: instead of concrete value - <20. I can be mistaken, but, apparently, I saw in one of my own, or in someone's analyses' report the concrete figures in this column, but not > or <.


We can only guess - what happened to other 10 pages of 13:

1) my family doctor "allowed" me to see exclusively 2 of them (and the 3-rd - with a false (alleged) "urine test" was added (fabricated) later);

2) my family doctor was, presumably, "missing" other 10 pages (probable options: instead of printouts, the empty blank pages were sent by fax; or 10 pages were stolen from his office, etc.);

3) the submission to his fax-machine was stopped by the sending side.


However, the coordinated elimination (or confiscation) of this lab test (2-10 April, 2015) prompts something more sinister, because this medical document disappeared from everywhere: from my family doctor; from Santé Québec database; from St.-Mary Hospital's archive; from Dr. Moris's office (because the lab faxed Dr. Morris the same test report on 13 pages).


My reaction and thinking speed is not perfect after years of persecutions, threats, stresses, injuries, police intimidation, etc., so, only 2 days later I figured out - what actually happened.


It became obvious that Dr. Morris did not "forget" my words (I also mentioned the same in my fax, when he did not want to listen) about a future urine tests as an eventual evidence that I am right in my suggestions and demands (which he blatantly ignored).


He, certainly, having an access to my medical file, was regularly studying my "health events" in the database, and was aware that - on March, 2, 2015 (after my visit to him) - I passed a urine test at St.-Mary's laboratory. However, it is evident that, besides his regular interest to my health file database, he also had an informer in St.-Mary's hospital laboratory, and was aware that, before my visit to him, I already went to this laboratory and waited in line, but, because there were too many people, I had to leave abruptly (without passing the test), and, instead, went to see Dr. Morris. When I was sitting on a chair in the corridor (at St.-Mary's lab), a nurse came to me and demanded to show my medical card. I refused, but the fact of this incident shows that someone wanted to be sure of my presence in the laboratory. The nurse, probably, knew how I'm looking, and reported to Dr. Morris (or to someone else) that I was there.


Remembering that he refused my requests to administrate tests for detecting UTI frequent infections, Dr. Morris understood that it was a requisition from another doctor, and instantly calculated all consequences for him, if the test will show an acute (ongoing) infection. This is why (in addition to the dipstick test in his office, which has shown an obvious infection) he, who, since autumn 2014, was refusing antibiotics, suddenly (March, 2, 2015) prescribed Cipro.


Dr. Morris, definitely, knew that I have an acute infection since autumn, 2014, as it was indicated by all "litmus paper" tests in his office, which have shown UTI few times, including March, 2, 2015.


He, certainly, learned right away - from his informers inside the laboratory, or from my medical file in government's database - that I passed a urine test, and that there is an acute infection. He, then, ordered his people in the lab to destroy all records about this test.


My mistake was passing this test in the same hospital, where Dr. Morris works. However, not only for me, an idealist - non-cynic, but even for the most well-informed and realistic people the very idea that something like this is possible, and that, if so (!), they live in a (to such a degree!) corrupted and perverse state, and that the whole state hospital can be involved into criminal conspiracy and mafia-style cover-up of medical crimes, with all-staff coordination - could blow out one's mind. One thing is a knowledge that doctors and other medics too often commit isolated and random medical crimes, enjoying the disgusting doctors' impunity in North America, and a completely different thing - is a nightmare reality of coordinated medical crimes committed by a group of accomplices, the whole health care system, and medical workers as government's accessories.


An only comforting fact is that the majority of medical doctors and other medics in Canada are honest and compassionate people, who form a palpable resistance to the brutal totalitarian regime, refusing to cooperate with its oppressive terror organizations, and helping abused and persecuted patients (like me) to stay alive. For the very fact that I am still alive, I have to be grateful to brave altruistic doctors and other medical workers, who saved me from greater troubles many times. Regrettably, I am not able to thank them not only financially, but even to name them publicly, because of the fear that they might be revenged by their colleagues-criminals and by the state enforcement terrorist agencies.


As part of this cover up operation, corrupted medics planned to replace the confiscated test by another one (forged), which will warrant "no infection" statement, because they knew that now I am on antibiotics, and, so, this repeated urine test will show no traces of bacteria. This is why they did all possible tricks to fool me out - and to force me to pass a repeated test.


However, I managed to escape this trap, and, thus, the bacterial culture test just vanished completely.


It is sadly - if my family doctor also participated in this cover up: first, concealing - from me - that the last urinalysis microbiology test (March, 2, 2015) disappeared; then - artfully replacing the alleged 2-nd page of the test report by some paper (at the very moment when I was photographing this page, looking into a very small camera's screen, where I could not see what was written on this page); and later ordering his secretary to cheat me by replacing the pages of 2 March 2015 test's papers by another test's report. All this might be done to conceal from me the fact of confiscation of the last (March, 2, 2015) test.


Yet, if he simply did a mistake, just mechanically mentioning a non-existing "second page", and instinctively pushing a page, which he took for test's 2-nd page; and - if his secretary just confused the absent (of the demanded (by me) bacterial microbiology-culture page with other medical data, and, therefore, gave me a different document, without any bad intention: then, their participation in the cover up does not look so obvious.


The same - concerns a formally "obvious" fact that he might destroy the blood test report (on his end) from April 10, 2015, because, by logic, he received all 13 pages by fax, and, allegedly, destroyed 11 of them (besides the fake repeated ur. test) and left untouched (not destroyed) only 2 pages.


Knowing my family doctor since 1997 (when one of my friends became his patient; in 1999 or 2000 my mother became his patient, and - later - I myself), I cannot believe that he was capable to commit such crime. Even if the fate of 11 pages of 13 sent by fax becomes a mystery, and could be easily explained if we accept that my family doctor simply destroyed them, I don't accept such an explication.


The most inexplicable mystery is the page, by which my family doctor artfully managed to replace the alleged "second" page from March, 2, 2015 test. It was the very requisition, on which I passed the urine test on March, 2, 2015, and which was returned to me (with marks and remarks) by St.-Mary's laboratory's registration nurse. How got this document on March, 3, 2015 (Tuesday), to my family doctor's office, and how it got back to my apartment on March, 7, 2015 (Saturday), when I noticed it - on one of the photos - on my family doctor's office table, hectically made a revision of recent medical documents, and found it safe in my home?


Moreover, after passing the delayed blood test on the same requisition paper on 10 April, 2015, I saw it (this same requisition document!) again - among medical documents in my chart in my family doctor's office, while it had to remain at St.-Mary's hospital forever in the records?


And - because the fax listed 13 pages, and, thus, the blood test (March, 10, 2015) rapport disappeared AFTER laboratory, - same report's pages were simultaneously destroyed 1) somehow in my family doctor's office; 2) in the general system of St.-Mary's hospital's electronic database; 3) in the laboratory; and 4) in the medical archive. Something even more global had to happen, because this test's record was, certainly, already entered into the provincial Santé Québec database (judging by its 3 survived pages' printout), and only later was destroyed. In other words, the test result report did not vanish in the laboratory, but was fully issued by the lab, was sent (all 13 pages) to my family doctor's office, to the office of Dr. Morris, and was automatically entered into all electronic databases, and only by then erased, destroyed and confiscated from everywhere.


Thus - totally - complete 13 (!) pages were sent by fax to my family doctor's office, and only 2 of 13 pages (except of an additional page (13 of 13) with a false claim that I, allegedly, refused to provide a urine test on March, 10, 2015, though I already provided a sample on March 2, 2015, on this requisition) were available, while other pages were - de facto - missing.


I repeat that, perhaps, there were rare, or unusual, or even strange display of some indicators in test reports from 2 March - 10 April, 2015: for example, instead of concrete value, it was indicated <20. Definitely, "more than 20" should be interpreted as "abnormal" by any lucid scale. However, if so, then it might become an accusation, suggesting a responsibility for denying anti-inflammatory medications, appropriate tests, and recognition of arthritis or rheumatism, or gout - chondrocalsynovitis, refusing to produce or to recognize any diagnosis of chronic bones-joints-cartilage illness in me.


It is evident that the "lost" (disappeared) pages of this blood test (March, 10, 2015), as well as the loss of the microbiology test (March, 2, 2015), have displayed something so devastating for doctors that it was more favorable for them to confiscate these pages, destroying forever a package of these medical documents.


Concerning the original urine analysis of March 2, 2015 (see few pages above): there is only 1 page (the urinalysis dipstick), while the page of culture (microbiology) was, as it looks, erased directly from the digital database, but not after the printout, because - otherwise - in the beginning and at the bottom of the page there would not stand "1 from 1" (1 page from 1), but "1 of 2".


When later, in May-June, 2015, I twice addressed to the medical archive of St.-Mary's Hospital, this (shown above) ur. test from 2-nd March 2015 was already none-existing. Instead of THIS particular document, the archive presented a fake "urine test" from 10-th March 2015 with the remark "the patient refused to collect the sample". (See (few pages) below). It means that this single page from 2-3-2015 has disappeared (was confiscated or destroyed, or made "classified"), too.


See below: a fake urinalysis, by which the monsters have replaced an only survived page of the 2-3-2015 test:


The copy of the page (13 of 13), "attached" to blood test rapport of April 10, 2015, where it is said that the patient, allegedly, "refused to provide a urine sample".

In this false statement, the threefold lie is presented.

First, I already provided a urine sample on this requisition on March, 2, 2015.

Secondly, if I "refused to provide a urine sample", why it is printed at the right side of this document: "collected 10-04-2015", at 10:23? (This contradictory statement indirectly proving that the sample WAS collected indeed, just not on 10-04-2015, but on 02-03-2015).

And, thirdly, the microbiology result from March, 2, 2015, which was destroyed, could not appear - as "via time-machine" - on March, 10, 2015!

An additional triple lie is read in the fact that they 1) obviously were about hiding the disappearance of the microbiology test by cowardly replacing it by a new one; 2) concealed from me (when I came to the laboratory on March, 10, 2015) the disappearance of a part of the urine test from March, 2, 2015 (microbiology, 2-nd page); and 3) probably, reprinted this document at 10:55 without microbiology section, destroying a possible earlier urine test rapport (2 pages: dipstick, microscopy, and microbiology).


This outraged deception is even more striking, because I came back (10-4-2015) to pass the blood test with the original requisition - for blood and urine count test (from my family doctor), on which I already passed the urine test on March 2, 2015, with an additional official printout (see above), and with the copy of the urine test report for March 2, 2015.


I repeat that, when I came to the appointment with my family doctor (March, 3, 2015), and asked for his permission to copy my last laboratory analysis, he allowed me to photograph it, and I copied 1 page. Knowing that - by norms - there are always 2 pages, I was prepared to copy the 2-nd page, and my family doctor also mentioned 2 pages. I photographed the 1-st page, and took a photograph of the 2-nd page. However, when, at home, I inspected the 2-nd page's image, I realized that it was not the same page, which I was looking to before taking the second shot. It means that, after my glance to some page (which I took for a printout of microbiology rapport), my family doctor covered this page with another paper - in the very moment, when I was taking the photo. [There is a chance that my family doctor did not cover the previous paper intentionally (for example, understood in a break of a second that this given paper is not a lab rapport).]


I do not know, what exactly was on that unknown page (which I saw before the shot), because my failing eyesight did not allow me to see well. In its turn, the occasional paper, which the doctor used as a shield and pushed to cover the "original" page (which I saw before taking the photo), appeared to be the same requisition, which he filled and signed for the same blood-urine test, and which I presented first at St.-Mary's laboratory to pass the urine test on March, 2, 2015, and later to pass the blood test April 10, 2015.


I remind that, when I came to St.-Mary hospital's laboratories on March 2, 2015, and reported that I will provide today only a urine sample, and will come for blood test later, they highlighted the blood test line (in the document) with yellow felt-tip pen, and double crossed out the line of urine test. Then, they scanned and printed out this requisition for themselves, returning the original to me.


[Then having handed to me also an additional paper where the same was specified.]


But how could an already used requisition, which, in principle, has to remain in the laboratory for reporting, got to doctor's table again? After passing the blood test (March 10, 2015), when the original requisition stayed in the hospital, I (later) saw (again) this same requisition in my family doctor's office, as if it was sent back to him again (now - twice). I asked a familiar nurse, and she told that they do not send requisitions to doctors back, but leave them in the laboratory.


I asked this question even in a laboratory - and was answered that the requisitions on analyses remain by them.


Another mystery is how the document, which was returned to me by the laboratory nurses, appeared on my family doctor's table, in his office!


Besides, on April, 10, 2015, I presented myself in St.-Mary's lab with the same original requisition again. Maybe, my family doctor gave it back to me on March, 3, 2015?


These facts and common sense indicate that the presence of this requisition in the folder of my file at my family doctor's office is an evidence of something unnatural.


Other interpretation of my family doctor's gesture are also possible.


What if he not accidentally palmed off on me for photographing this already used and "miraculously" reappeared (in his office) requisition for blood-urine test, but deliberately made it visible to show me how far everything goes and how serious it becomes, and to let me know that he is not guilty of anything?


CHAPTER 7.


11 - 15 April, 2015.

Between April 11 and 15, I visited St.-Mary's medical archive 2 more times, but they refused to issue a copy of my blood-urine analysis for March 2, 2015, all the same.


On April 13, 2015, I sent a fax to my family doctor concerning manipulations with my laboratory analyses and results of other exams, and their frequent loss.


To Dr. (......) (tel...........); to: fax:........ /

From Lev Gunin (tel........)


Dear Dr. ....!

I'm faxing my left elbow X-Ray reading from March 4, 2015.

According to your claim, you never received it (i.e. it was not submitted to your office). However, in the Intelerad PACS system (pacs.vmmed.com), this X-Ray 20150304-053 was marked as "sent by fax" to dr. Ivan Rohan (514) 731-0395.

In 2013-2014, dr. Krasny"s secretaries claimed that never received my left foot MRI-scan [Jean-Talon Hospital (October 16, 2013)].

I failed to recover it from hospital's archive as well.

However, when few days ago I contacted dr. Krasny's secretary, it looked like she saw it, but refused to reveal it to me.

Please, help me to obtain this MRI as it can contribute to correct diagnostics. (etc.)

April 13, 2015. Yours truly, Lev (Leon) Gunin.


Repeatedly same fax was sent on April 23, 2015.


April 16, 2015.

I sent a fax to medical archive, from where I received a call today. The caller female suggested that I should come personally to them - to fill out the questionnaire, - but warned that (all the same) I will not receive the requested copies. She disconnected before I could ask her, why I should appear personally; why an official norm that was already developed for receiving any requested (digitally) document by fax or by mail does not applicable for me; and what's the point for me in coming to the archive - if I'll be refused the requested documents all the same. And, because I already spoke to the same women twice, I suggested that this was not Madame Lucy Opartny, the administrator of St.-Mary's hospital, with whom I also spoke twice on the phone, when demanded to speak with the supervisor.


April 17, 2015.

In the morning, I came to St.-Mary's Hospital's medical archive with my older daughter.


She asked the staff to show her the governed regulations code, on which basis copies of medical documents may be refused.


The same worker, with whom - on April 16, 2015 - I spoke on the phone, showed some paper in French, but said that she is permitted only to show this document, and not to give it in patients' (or other visitors') hands, and allowed to run by eyes just few lines, holding it in front of my daughter's face.


When I asked, why it is not possible to hold 2 pages of these rules or instructions normally in hands, to copy them, and even to read them, this senior employee of the medical archive said that it is a classified document, and that she already exceeded her authority, by just having shown it to us.


I will not tell - how, - but I managed to shot a photo of this paper, signed by Madame Lucy Opartny, and, later, by analyzing it, came to a conclusion that it violates multiple Canadian and International rules and laws, charter of rights and freedoms, and, by its type, its secrecy, its inadequate status, and its extrajudicial character corresponds the secrecy practice of Hitler or Stalin regimes.


Here (below) is the copy of its test (in French original):


10-11-2003.


Avis aux employés des archives médicales et des laboratoires.


Re: Demandes des résultats de tests de laboratoire pour les patients provenant du bureau privé de médecins (POD).


Suite à une réunion entre le département des archives et des laboratoires, il a été convenu, que:


1) Le laboratoires informent les patients que les résultats sont transmis au médecin référent dans un délai de 24 à 48 heures, après la pris de sang. Ils doivent contacter ce médecin pour obtenir le résultat verbal ou obtenir une photocopie [highlighted]. Cela s'applique également dans le cas où le patient voyage à l'étranger.

2) Ils est possible de faire une demande d'accès aux archives pour transmettre ce résultat à un autre médecin. Dans ce cas le délai est de 2 à 3 semaines.

3) Si il y a Urgence Médical, le médecin ayant obtenu les résultats dans les 25 heures contactera le patients pour l'en aviser. Lorsque l'urgence est motivée, tout autre médecin pourra contacter les archives et obtenir par fax les résultats dans un délai de 24 à 48 heures, s'il nous fourni le consentement du patient.

4) Le département des archives médical s'obtiendra de donner des résultats au patient lui-même, puisque le personnel n'est pas en mesure d'évaluer la condition du patient, ni d'en interpréter les résultats.


Merci de votre collaboration,


Isabelle Roy,

Archives Médical

Responsable du secteur de l'accès à l'information.


cc. Louise Quellet Legaut

cc. Régina Zver


[I present this text with all the grammatical and stylistic mistakes of the original.]


No legal status of this document is revealed in its text.

No correlation with the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

No comments in regard of justification and explanation of the restrictions to access essential personal information by the patients.

No clarification of the reasons of these regulations.

No clue, why the access to tests' results has to be restricted to patients, with the exception of the cases of the most unfortunate tests' findings.

No clue about this document's judicial validity (force of the law).

No explanation about who are M-me Legaut and M-me Zver...


No wonder that the mayhem in the medical system is running the show...


It was by then (the same day, 17-4-2015), when I got an additional page: this fake urine test from 10-3-2015 (see above), marked as "page 13 of 13" of the blood test from April, 10, 2015; I saw it by then (17-4-2015) for the first time.


After medical archive, I, accompanied by my older daughter, came to the secretary of my family doctor, and asked her, with the consent of the doctor, to try to get the missing pages of my last laboratory tests (the blood-urine analysis from March 2, 2015, and April, 10, 2015: microbiology (including culture), biochemistry, etc., from the medical archive. The secretary got in touch by phone with the archive, demanding all missing medical documents, but was answered that the pages of the mentioned tests, which copy Dr. Rohan already received: are the only pages, which exist, and that there are no other pages of the same analysis any more.


After her call to the laboratory, i.e. after our common attempts to learn whether there still possible to recover the missing pages of the tests' reports, it became clear that the missing medical documents are gone forever.


Only after that I managed to receive a copy of one more document. It is the document fabricated by the laboratory instead of the true urine test rapport from March 2, 2015, and presented (like a replacement-imposture) for it (i.e. "attributed" to the same requisition), where it was written that "the patient refused to make the test of urine".


It became clear at once that - on April 10, 2015, - when they tried to force me to pass a urine test repeatedly: it was the plot for the purpose of concealment of the withdrawal of a part of the test's result.


In a month, when I made one more attempt of investigation, an additional "improbable" fact came to light: that the initial - the only - page of this ill-fated blood-urine test from March 2 - April 10, 2015, NOW ALSO "disappeared" from St.-Mary's Hospital's medical archive, from my files at 2 doctors' offices, from McGill University hospitals' and other medical institutions' general computer (medical) database: from everywhere; and - instead of it - this fake document of April 10, 2015, was finally installed.


After that the whole picture of awful falsifications became, clearly, visible.


Here, below, is, in short, an additional retelling.


On November 3, 2014 (precisely on my birthday): first symptoms (again acute) of the UTI infection have appeared. [It is important to know that I did not drink alcohol and cold beverages, and did not eat anything spicy, sour, salt, or bitter.]

I addressed to my family doctor, and to urologist, Dr. Morris, concerning this infection, but it did not bring desirable results.

I could not obtain an appointment with my family doctor in November, 2014, while Dr. Morris refused an emergency appointment, and authorized the reception only on November, 25, 2014, at 15:20. I managed to visit my family doctor only on December, 10, 2014, at 11:30.

Naturally, my family doctor could not contest the decision of a specialist (especially, such an authority (and such a ferocious and dangerous personage) as Dr. Morris). So, I had an appointment with my family doctor on December, 10, 2014, and the following day, December, 11, 2014, with Dr. Morris, at 9:30.

My requests of antibiotics and the laboratory microbiology-culture analysis were denied by both doctors.

In November and December, 2014, I visited 2 more doctors in walk-in clinics, and 1 more doctor in a hospital.

Naturally, they asked me, when the infection started, and, naturally, I responded: on November, 3, 2014; then they, naturally, infringed into my medical file in the governmental database - to see, if and when I had appointments with other doctors; then, discovering my appointments (in November and December) with Dr. Morris and my family doctor, they concluded that both of them denied me antibiotics and tests. Having an undeniable proof that I am suffering from a UTI infection, they, nevertheless, also denied me antibiotics and laboratory tests, because did not want to go against their colleagues-doctors. Even if I was near death, they would rather kill me than dispute their colleagues' actions. This is how that criminal system of public health care works.

One of above-mentioned doctors just kicked me out from his office right after finding out that I already asked other doctors to administrate antibiotics and lab tests, and 2 of his colleagues, pretending that they sympathize to my case, still claimed that they "can do nothing".

Because of the refusal of antibiotics, lab tests, and other medical measures, by the end of November, 2014 (i.e. almost in a month) a dangerous autoimmune reaction (similar to immunoglobulin-A vasculitis) already began to develop. This reaction, as well as the fact that the infection worked like diuretics, apparently, sharply raised the level of uric acid that probably caused crystallization in joints (adjournment of salts), being followed by pain, reddening, swelling, increased temperature of joints.

Though one more doctor in a walk-in clinic refused to examine my elbow and cyst on the scar on my left foot, she, nevertheless, directed me to a very detailed laboratory analyses, for which (as I learned later) she was cruelly punished by her colleagues-doctors.

[I cannot disclose the source of this information about her.]

In the laboratory of Montreal General Hospital, they not only sabotaged the urine test (it was not done), but also subjected me to demonstrative mockery during the registration procedure. For the next day (November 28, 2014), i.e. almost right after blood test: I felt a terrible left elbow pain (the blood was taken from my left hand), in comparison with which the joints "did not hurt" at all before. (I just state the fact, without expressing any insinuation, the more so, that I know this male nurse as a very professional and good man).

It is excessive to say that the symptomatic UTI infection and also the level of uric acid could not be proved or ruled out (as a suspicion of adjournment of salts could not be confirmed or ruled out) because of denial (by doctors) and sabotage (by laboratories) of urinalysis' microbiology-culture.

Up to March, 2015, no doctor agreed to administrate antibiotics and lab tests (except of above-mentioned doctor in a walk-in clinic; but her requisition was sabotaged by Montreal General Hospital's laboratory, where they sabotaged the urine test), and only my family doctor - at the end of February, 2015 - not only administrated blood-urine test, but did it through a "pre-requisition".

Trying to describe the events briefly and omitting many important points, I will add that up to April 3, 2015, ALL DOCTORS also refused anti-inflammatory, in spite of my steady requests.

And again - only Dr. Ivan Rohan (alone!) prescribed Naproxen on April 3, 2015.

However, the pharmacy stopped this medication (in spite of the prescription!!!) 1 week after the beginning of its course.

Of course, it was already too late, when the damage of joints and bones was well under way, and already caused, as I assume, irreversible changes, but the pharmacy, which blocked me an opportunity to extend the course of anti-inflammatory, inflicted an additional blow to my health. (See above).

From February to April, 2015, I sent 4 faxes to Dr. Morris and to my family doctor, in which I reproached them for blocking me an access to medications and lab tests, and, in particular, to antibiotics and anti-inflammatory.

I also reproached them for blocking an access to the most necessary - for each current moment - diagnostic procedures.

Besides, I stated to both that the prescription of medications and (or) appointment of diagnostic procedures are administrated (by them - and other doctors (like doctors from walk-in clinics, emergency rooms, etc.) not when it is necessary and when I demand it in connection with trauma, infection, inflammation, abscess, arthritis, or other acute diseases, but much later (when it is already useless, or when a damage is already irreversible) - turned into continuous practice.

The objective of such tactics is to cover up the REAL sabotage of diagnostics and treatment by a show, which goal is to demonstrate that FORMALLY medications, it seems, were prescribed (and, allegedly, it is not important - when, it is not important that too late!), and, therefore, supposedly claims of the patient are groundless. However, in fact, prescribing medications when it is already too late is the same as to prescribe medications to a patient, who is already dead...

The purpose of these faxes was - to convince doctors to satisfy my demands; no other purpose was previsioned or hidden. I had no other purposes and intentions.

In nearly 20 years of treatment at my family doctor, I never officially complained about him, never complained about him to other doctors, but, on the contrary, praised him and his qualification.

On the contrary, I perfectly understood that he did for me more than any other doctor usually does for his patient, that he saved me from innumerous troubles, prevented many diseases, and helped me to get out of many indispositions.

On the other hand, I assumed that Dr. Morris - by his refusal to meet my demands - already did an irreparable harm to my health: to the urinal tract system, to joints, - and that - if antibiotics were prescribed in time - joints would not be irreversibly damaged. And the initial reason of all current serious problems (announced in my faxes) were the refusal of antibiotics (concerning the UTI infection since November, 2014).

And here, let us assume that a urine test (which administrated my family doctor, and which I passed on March 2, 2015) revealed such an acute infection, and showed highly increased level of uric acid (hyperuricemia).

If it came to light, it would become a potential "abscess" not only on Dr. Morris's, and other doctors' and medical institutions' conscience, but also a fat spot on the whole SYSTEM's face, because would confirm the fairness of my reproaches and the faults of medics that, having blocked me an access to drugs and diagnostics, provoked the transformation of an acute infection into a chronic disease and to dangerous autoimmune reaction, and - further - triggered an arthritis attack and damage to bones and joints, as well as damage of urological bodies, and, in result, the irreversible pathologies to the level of the need of a surgical intervention.

On the basis of such a "confirmative" result of this test, it would be easy to assume that doctors provoked quite serious complications, having refused me tests and medications.

The easiest and simplest: is to assume that my family doctor, Dr. Krasny, and Dr. Morris (close friends), having learned about the result of the urine test from March 2, 2015, adverse for them, phoned, conspired, and decided to "cross out (to eliminate)" this test's data (in one way or another).

This assumption is, allegedly, supported by the fact that all 3 doctors are not just prominent in Montreal, and doctors with very high reputation, but very influential persons in the medical circles, having a number of membership, administrative, official, and other powers.

One of them - Dr. Morris - is the owner of doctors-direct-com web service, which place most of Montreal's doctors in dependence of him, and the other one is the former associated dean of McGill University, which runs all hospitals of the most important hospitals' network in Montreal, with which the initial persecution in medical institutions was generally connected for me.

And, still, I am, categorically, skeptical about such an assumption, completely rejecting it.

My rejection of such a theory not only caused by what lies on surface.

I do not say any more that it is absolutely impossible to believe that my family doctor participated in such an assumed conspiracy.

It is also impossible to believe that Dr. Krasny took part in such a conspiracy.

It is also evident for me that Dr. Morris, on his part, acted not alone, having contrived to destroy the result of the laboratory test from March 2, 2015, without the government and the governmental administrative-oppressive institutions.

Somehow it would be too simple, and does not reflect the reality, and the contradictive nature of doctor Morris, who is, after all, first of all a doctor, but not a pathological intriguer.

I think that it was done "for him" by other people, and, most likely, without his direct participation. However, as we can suggest, with his silent approval.

Besides these, above stated, there are also other reasons.

I do not know in details - how this system works, and whether these three doctors (even if I believe that one of them (Dr. Morris) is, definitely, capable of medical crimes) had a practical opportunity to turn such an operation.

Moreover, there are serious doubts even in whether they really needed to destroy the result of this analysis.

My family doctor could quite convince Dr. Morris that "this patient" (that is - I) only sends faxes for years (having despaired to get what he asks for), but NEVER even thought to address to a medical lawyer. And Dr. Morris, as I understand, not a bast a board, and perfectly understands who - in my person - stands before him (let say, not absolutely usual - but quite a harmless person).

One more reason.

If doctor Morris and my family doctor arranged a hacker attack or asked such person as mister Robert Cox - one of few, who, in the system of McGill institutions, can do it without the risks of consequences: they, according to the logic of things, would destroy this analysis completely, and any mention of it, and hardly would leave even 1 page.

Also improbable that (running forward) the test result on bacterial microbiology-culture was not included (on someone's conspiracy) in the form of the test's report at once (as it claims the response to my complaint: like, they "forgot" to include it). I, nevertheless, believe that the data on the bacterial microbiology-culture test - after all - was entered, and only after they "removed" it.

It could be quite probable that Dr. Morris participated in the deletion of the test from March, 2, 2015, but only if he was motivated by his personal motives.

However, emotional and intuitive intuition prompt that it is difficult to believe that Dr. Morris could conspire with other medics and medical administrators for undermining my health and for destroying the evidence of his and other doctors wrongdoing, deleting the test from March, 2, 2015. What non-personal reasons could he have? Corporate and academic patriotism? Protection of McGill University and its hospitals "honor" (St-Mary's Hospital)? In that case, during all my previous conflicts with this network of hospitals - Dr. Morris and Dr. Krasny would somehow show their (connected to particular events) hostility, but they were not.

There are also others a reason, which I omit for the economy of space.

As for doctor Krasny and my family doctor, it seems to me that the ideas of Pan-Slavism and Slavic solidarity are not alien to them, and, therefore, as a Russian-speaking and Polish-speaking person, and, as an opponent of the former Soviet regime and former activist in USSR - I had to be sympathetic to them. Besides, as an educated person, my family doctor must know, who and why killed Jan Masarik (his killer was Zionist-NKVD agent - Belenky (who finished his lifespan in Israel) - and why Stalin took Czechoslovakia.

I have to remember also - how many times my family doctor helped me, when, apparently, there is no rescue, and when all other medics denied any assistance. His help during our conflict with the medical department of Immigration around the counterfeited "tubercular" fluorography; numerous diagnostic measures appointed by him (head CT scan, the transrectal scan [which I could not pass because of persecution during this period by police], ultrasonographies, a number of bones' and joints' x-rays, the "infinite" requisitions on blood-urine tests, etc.); several courses of antibiotics and other drugs administrated by him, which ALL other doctors refused: it is impossible to forget about all this. Dr. Ivan Rohan: not only a top-level doctor (real walking treasure of medical knowledge), but also a doctor-humanist, one of the last humanists in our post-humanism world: if I though understand people a little and feel their spiritual essence.

It is necessary to remember also that Dr. Brian Morris is a urologist who, unlike Dr. Daniel Pharand, mentioning - since 2014 - the cystoscopy, did not begin to insist on it and to put it as a condition of continuing treatment and diagnostics, but "replaced" this sadistic procedure with the cytology analysis in "couple" with ultrasonography (ultrasound on his requisition form January 26, 2015). He even weighed appointment for me for a "virtual" cystoscopy, which is almost not practicing in the public health system in Canada. He also several times prescribes medications, which other doctors refused to me, and, despite his bold and weird accusations that I am, allegedly, make excessive use of Canadian public health system, sent me to ultrasonography concerning problems of his profile (January 26, 2015 - see above). Whether it is necessary to add that the doctor, who did all this, hardly planned to kill his patient, or destroy his patient's health?! This is an evident that Dr. Morris is a very inconsistent and contradictory personality, and that he hardly could act as a completely cynical and amoral individual.

And, yet, some actions of Dr. Morris gradually began to add new elements to undermining my health; as though it was turned some mechanism, earlier not involved. But there is still something, even stronger emphasizing inexplicable and even strange abyss (contradiction) between some of the actions of Dr. Morris, Dr. Krasny, Dr. Rohan - and other their actions. These are lessons of the alternative medicine, which all 3 doctors (as well as Dr. Peter Szego) actually taught me. So, during first 3 visits to his office, Dr. Morris taught me how to use natural replacement of antibiotics at repeated outbreaks of UTI: sitting hot baths; cranberry juice; garlic "therapy"; intensive exercises (gymnastics) for the lower body; special diet; and a lot of things alike. However, a completely different thing is that he lectured all this during his very short (1-1,5 min.) undisputable monologues (during the routine procedures), preventing me to speak and to ask questions, preventing dialogues, and not allowing me to say that I already know these alternative methods, using them, but, in the last 4 years, those methods ceased to help me.

Having understood that I have an excellent short-term memory and that I can, having come home, to write down on "fresh traces" nearly all dialogues, 4 best doctors "dropped" whole "pages" of the similar information (not known even to all experts of his profile) on my cogitative "hard drive". Among other things, they fed me by revelation that, for example, parsley (or parsley with fennel) for some people work as alpha-blockers, etc.

Why then - after first 3 visits (actually, since my 2-nd visit, but, more manifestly, after first 3 appointments) - the attitude of Dr. Morris towards me has abruptly changed; and why it was necessary - for him (and for other 3 doctors) - to educate me the recipes of alternative medicine if it was possible just to administrate diagnostic tests and to prescribe usual-conventional medications?

It was not less major and most valuable data that Dr. Rohan "put in me".

Doctor Rohan, besides, trained me not only how to use natural remedies for a victory over any given illness, but also briefly educated me under all sections of "conventional" ("academic") medical science. He, in brief (very capaciously, extremely laconically) explained functions of many physiological, anatomic, biochemical, and other mechanisms. It is difficult not to think that it was nothing else but a course of SURVIVAL WITHOUT MEDICATIONS. But - for what reason 6 elderly doctors (2 other doctors, besides Dr. Morris, Dr. Krasny, Dr. Szego, and Dr. Rohan) would begin to train me in survival without drugs course basics, if 1) did not sympathize with me and did not want me to survive despite of my enemies' intrigues; and 2) would not expect that some interested parties, who say to them - what to do, - are going to block - for me - an access to medications; and 3) did not express, thereby, their disagreement to these totalitarian repressive methods that transform the health care from humanitarian mission institution into political oppression tool (that, on early stages, was tested on victims like me)?

This highly confused me, and, because of this contradiction, I, despite all unethical acts of Dr. Morris and outbreaks of his ferocious temperament, still tried to find an acceptable "consensus" with him, and did not enough actively attempted to transfer myself to another urologist, and also gave dual interpretation even to such his statements as the antibiotics "are not allowed you any more", or that I, supposedly, an "ideological enemy", or that I, allegedly, misuse (overdue) the system of public health care (demanding "too many" blood-urine count tests), etc.

On the other hand, the "lectures" of doctor Rohan and councils of doctor Morris could have purely superficial (formal) resemblance, whereas doctor Rohan might have absolutely different motives, not those that were standing behind Dr. Morris's objectives. If Dr. Rohan sought to bypass taboos, and, opposing them, tried - after all - help me somehow, then Dr. Morris, perhaps, just escaped from the answers (demanded by me), jumping on councils to take far away our doctor-patient communication - as far as possible from most urgent medical subjects, whereas perfectly understood (himself) that - at this stage - any hot baths, cranberry juice, or garlic therapy already will not help in any way.

Not accidentally he let me in his office only once, at my very first visit, and - during all subsequent visits - admitted me exclusively in the examination room, and, so, did not make any written entries concerning observations, my complaints, exams results, etc., but scribbled absolutely abstract official medical reports "on duty", using just several words, which did not have any relation to my specific case and features of my disease.


Dr. Morris's talks about the "overexpenditure" of public funds, his reproaches in my address, identical to provocations of Immigration department, when, in 1997-2004, Immigration officers, on one hand, have "accused" my mother and me of being "a danger to public health" - using falsified fluorography, fake diagnosis "tuberculosis", and other fabricated pseudo-medical data, and, on the other hand, purposefully damaging my mother's, and mine health: were a hint signal for me that something bizarre is going on. However, Dr. Morris's contradictory approach puzzled me, blurring my logical conclusions.


Concerning doctors' systematic sabotage of the essential, necessary medications: it is more than strange (especially, in 1998-2014), because one and all doctors in Canada are tightly connected with the kingdom of pharmacology, and prescription of medicines, which, on the one hand, is limited by certain reasonable limits, on the other hand, is - in every possible way - stimulated.

Therefore, hardly doctors would begin to behave with me in this regard atypically without "external" reasons.

And here, despite all listed (and not listed - since there are too many of them) "merits" before me, my family doctor, first, in peak to his general goodwill to me, at some moments SUDDENLY showed rather a rigid (if not to consider concomitant circumstances) attitude and negligence, refusing the most essential medications and diagnostic procedures, and (as many other doctors) - from time to time - misinformed me concerning symptoms, diagnostics, exams, and laboratory analyses.

Why?!

His health issues, family busyness, and similar matters are not taken into consideration, because, first, he is a highly disciplined and responsible person, and, secondly, some of his short outbreaks of enmity and refusals to render an adequate medical help were connected to intensified police surveillance, my particular conflicts with Dr. Morris and other doctors, and medical laboratories, etc. This all draws an inevitable conclusion that most (if not all) of my family doctor's unfriendly actions were triggered by the pressure (politically motivated) from the government and its oppressive agencies, and that he was FORCED to participate in political persecutions of dissidents, risking, if disobedient, not only to lose his medical license, but to be exposed to direct danger to himself and to members of his family.

On the other hand, whether could Dr. Morris decide on permanently expelling me from his office; on open attacks of rage, even violent aggression; on outright manifestation of irritation and intolerance; on absolutely wild and aggressive attacks of personal character; and on all the rest that he did - if not any "reinforced concrete" support "from above", and confidence in his full impunity?

Whether could he act this way if saw in me a person who would ran to complain of him?

And whether, on the other hand, could he act this way, without being afraid that some data on his behavior will filter somewhere and that then he will go hard with it?

But, if doctor Morris was not afraid in any way that I will file an official complain, then it excludes his interest in destroying this ill-fated March, 2, 2014, analysis (if not taking into consideration a motive of his personal arrogance and egoistic tendency to prove that he is always right). The lack of answers to these questions actually means lack of answers to a question - how and why the medical policy, which is practically destroyed my health and interpolated with a number of "not medical" diversions against me with the same purpose, could be formed?


This government's policy (affecting activists, dissidents, victims of personal vengeance of state officials, victims of mafia punishment via corrupted government officials, etc.) is clearly manifested through a number of principles:

1) unwillingness (or ban?) to sound and to officially register any diagnoses;

2) closing of access to results of analyses and exams, or, at least, to a part of their contents;

3) restriction or blockage of access to medications and diagnostic procedures in the period of acute diseases and deteriorations (when ESSENTIAL medicines are necessary), and - as blind - their appointment later: when they are not needed any more, or are not so necessary;

4) systematic provocations in medical institutions (from longer - than for all other patients - waiting time in doctors' offices, walk-in clinics, etc., to wild attempts to provoke various conflicts);

5) falsifications, fabrications, or withdrawals of medical documents (laboratory tests, exams, and diagnoses (or parts of their contents) - and doctors' "duty" to hide and to cover up System's medical crimes;

6) ignoring of most serious complaints and symptoms of "unwelcomed" patients.


From 2001 (the year of "false flag" "terrorist acts") to 2015, I witnessed the extension of the categories of citizens - victims, included into this list of targets of state-sponsored medical terrorism: most vulnerable and marginalized social, ethnic, age-related, homelessness-related, etc. groups of people. If, in 1990-s - beginning of 2000-s, I was one of few people, experienced instances of the despotic totalitarian usage of medical system as a weapon for destroying lives of "unwanted" individuals, and only altruistic help of brave and just medical workers saved my life many times, in 2015, and later, already millions of people were sucked into this cruel mince-grinder nightmarish machine. Another, younger brainwashed generation of doctors and other categories of medical professionals, was raised by the totalitarian (after Jean Chretien) state: generation of cynics, conformists, police informers, careerists, heartless egoists, and sadists, who's goal in life is to experience all possible pleasures and adrenaline-stimulating sensations or adventures, and win all possible social and financial privileges and supremacy.


If compassionate and altruistic medics, who appreciated their profession as a humanitarian mission and moral privilege, constituted an overwhelming majority even 5-7 years ago, today, in 2015-2016, their share in the total number of medical professionals, according to my own experience, has shrink to 60-65 percent. But the worst thing is that this change became a steady tendency, which acceleration could transform the whole system of Canadian health care into totalitarian concentration camp style slaughter house. Today, in 2015-2016, I can prevision situations within the next few years, when tenth of thousands of patients will die on the floor of overcrowded Emergency Rooms not just before any medical intervention, but even before they could wait till any available seat; when tenth of thousands of patients will be dying from the most minor life-threatening causes because the ambulances will not arrive even after 3-5 days, and after dozens of calls; when the euthanasia laws will be expanded to the most cannibalistic and absurd slaughter practices, and when, instead of sending a medical team, a 9-11 operator will propose "painless death"; when clowns-politicians will "discuss" a "health crisis" and "hopeless situation", perfectly knowing that this "crises" is what they want and what they intentionally created, and that its name is savage privatization of medical services, social segregation, and social-political oppression. They will excuse their cruel shift towards the punitive medical care by any future geopolitical situation, epidemics, recessions, wars, and so on, perfectly knowing that the health care crisis was designed by them, and that no injection of money (money will be stolen or misused anyways) could help the system, which is already transformed from a humanitarian instrument into an instrument of the police-state oppression.


This is why even the most human doctors are forced to participate in the policy of medical sabotage and concealment accepted in all hospitals and other medical institutions of McGill University, and, little by little, introduced now also to the French hospitals.


This whole picture is further complicated by a theoretical influence of my "medical chronicle" (as a component of this series of articles) on my relations with doctors (more true, on their attitude towards me), and on succession of events.


Until quite recently, I even in thoughts did not assume that Quebec doctors could know not only about this chronicle content, but even about its existence. As already something "fantastic", I could suggest, first, that my pages on Internet are visited not by "2 and a half" Russian-speaking "cripples", but by a big audience with quite solid numbers of readers, and, secondly, that the medical community could be well informed about my opuses.

Just now it began to come out that my work in Russian and English languages about medical terrorism (1999) became the talk of the town in some local medical circles and that the series of articles ("License to Kill") if not read - then "looked through" (by means of Google Translator?) by some Montreal doctors.

It is hard to doubt that such their familiarizing with my creation works could take place without the help of some interested organizations or agencies, and that my articles are interpreted to people, who do not know Russian, with huge distortions, exaggerations, and intended disinformation.

My family doctor knows Russian, but not at such level of understanding, as, let us assume, such subtleties as my reflections about PROBABILITY (theoretical!) of "harmful" purpose of antibiotic Protrin (without binding to real events), and other complicated reasonings.

And we can only guess - how interested persons construe my chronicles to doctors.

And here what turns out.

Such doctors as my family doctor, risking their career, going into conflict with immigration department for the sake of refuting of the forged diagnosis "tuberculosis" - fabricated by Canadian Immigration's Health Services, - and ending the barbaric mockeries of the same department at my mother; carry out with me a medical "educational program" (training me how to defeat the intrigues of repressions' supporters); deliver to me (without prescription) medications in their offices (medications, which, apparently, "should not be prescribed for me"), and render for me any other favors and services; and I, ungrateful, instead of appreciation, immediately post the story about that on Internet, which - from their party - possibly, looks like a treachery or even denunciation.

For the sake of my salvation, some rules and formalities are violated, and I immediately report about these controversial acts on Internet. Where is the logic?

And here, it is possible to conclude with 100 percent confidence - that even such a cleverest person as my family doctor, could not understand the course of my reasoning and put himself on my place.

They did not realize that - for my point of view - their refusal to prescribe any necessary medication (and, instead, giving me these medications in hand personally in doctor's office without registration and record) - was perceived as sabotage of the instrumental legality of documentary registration of diagnosis and disease. I did not accuse doctors for this strategy, and, on the contrary, presented them as brave and compassionate heroes, who fight cruel tyrannical medical terrorism by bypassing the unhuman policy of the government, but, on the opposite, gave these examples as an evidence of state-sponsored medical terrorism. However, by making such facts public, I, in doctors' eyes, betrayed them, giving up their noble actions to the government.

They did not comprehend that - as an idealist and permanently persecuted person, isolated by persecutors from interaction with people, who - to some extent - was "torn off" from life, I still believed in "fair society", in the "rule of law", in "legality" and in "equality" of patients, regardless of their burse, connections and power.

In my still idealistic (before - approximately - 2013) chronicles: a different interpretation of doctors' actions would be regarded as nearly "fantasy". In other words, even such a level of doctors' resistance against the tyrannical rule of "unhuman health care" was still seen by me as a sort of conformism.

For example, if I showed obvious facts that, ignoring my symptoms and other signs of an acute disease, 4 doctors have committed criminal mistakes in the past, or even sought to do deliberately harm to my health, other doctors, like Dr. Rohan, Dr. Szego, Dr. B. Wang, or Dr. Krasny could not - in any way - record it legally (such are non-written regulations of medical institutions of McGill University), and the majority of conformist doctors - on their place - would not strike a finger in a finger, dooming me to a development of a chronic illness, or even to death. But only Dr. Rohan, and 4-5 more of his colleagues - bypassed the taboos and bans, getting out the fact that gave me medicines in their offices, behind closed doors, or "gave" me out a next secret of a trouble-free method to defeat the illness in an easy home-treatment way. And, from my "bell tower" it still seemed like "conformism" and "weakness".

Could the best and noble doctors, like Dr. Rohan, Dr. Krasny, Dr. El-Hakim, Dr. Pushie, Dr. Piche, Dr. Wang, Dr. Marie St.-Jacques, Dr. V., or Dr. Szego imagine that in the head of an author of some quite realistic views, who, it seems, had no illusions concerning the modern societies, could remain such idealistic delusions and complexes as a belief in the Law and Order, and Justice?!

Therefore (because of the abstract idealism) and for same reasons, I perceived remarks of Dr. Morris that "antibiotics are not allowed you any more", or that "a blood test costs for the government 500 dollars" - as attempts to open my eyes, and to remind me under what political regime we live. And even his remark that as a person "with "wrong" ideas" - I am treated (in medical and non-medical term) in Canada "too good" was perceived by me as a hint, not as an aggression and hostility. Even Dr. Morris's reply to complains about unbearable conditions and fallen to an abyss quality of life (due to untreated urological complications, cause by untreated UTI (including s.c. urgency), when he said "drink less liquids", I still tend to excuse him.

I tried to convince myself that the doctor, who said it, was not in rage, and said it not because he thinks so, but more likely on the contrary: to bring me down from heaven to earth. He, allegedly (so I interpreted his words) informed me of "reasoning of the authorities about me" to "warn me about an imminent danger".

Here is to what striking difference leads - how perceives the reality an artistic nature - and pragmatic, "brought down to earth" individual - even such few idealists as Dr. Szego, Dr. V., or Dr. Rohan!

Possibly, my idealistic self-sacrifice had to be perceived by morally responsible and professionally adequate doctors or as perfidy or ingratitude, or as incurable clinical dullness though - in recent months of 2015 - their remarks, it seems, showed that they began to start seeing clearly the roots and the meaning of my position.

These remarks can be interpreted as unsuccessful attempts - I will repeat - to lower me "from heaven on the earth", to return me sense of reality and to show that - at modern situation - it is silly "to stand up for the rights and freedoms", that I will be just crushed if I do not follow "general instructions".

My thinking, based on (partly irrational and overall) rejection of sinister realities has to be well clear to poets and musicians, who are familiar with destinies of Mozart, Byron, Mandelstam, or Nabokov, but at doctors it, perhaps, caused more and more confusion and irritation. And here, as their irritation grew, and pressure put upon them by repressive bodies and city's medical authorities (consisting today not of doctors, but of representatives of the enforcement agencies and intelligence circles) were increasing every day, doctors - even those whose merits before me are incalculable, - began to commit unethical acts.

Yes, a lot of information about alternative methods of dealing with illnesses - when the pharmacological medications are not available - was poured into me by conscientious doctors, but - with my poor financial resources - the alternative methods are more often also inaccessible.

Besides, the administrative terror and and other provocations - one more obstacle to self-treatment.

As a result, when I came to my family doctor with the inflamed cyst on an old scar on my back, at a stage of this inflammation transformation into an abscess, and later repeatedly came few times with an already developed abscess, and he refused 1) antibiotics; 2) antibacterial ointment; 3) referral to a surgeon; etc. - he provoked my long sufferings, wider surgical intervention and months of the wound suppurating and not healing, and other complications, not counting an ugly cosmetic defect.

Besides the requests stated to him, I let him know that all alternative methods (tried by me) are exhausted, they did not work.

Since November, 2014, prior to the beginning of March, 2015 (4 months), my family doctor and Dr. Morris systematically refused antibiotics, and only on March 2, 2015, Dr. Morris prescribed Cipro.

Since November, 2014, to the middle or the end of February, 2015, these 2 doctors refused to administrate the urine tests, which would include microbiology (culture) and uric acid level testing.

When such an analysis was made, its result (read above) "disappeared" (we read: was withdrawn).

And, at last, from November, 2014, till beginning of April, 2015 (5 months), my family doctor and Dr. Krasny persistently refused to prescribe anti-inflammatory drugs.

As a result of these refusals (and refusals of other doctors, whom I also visited, being refused EVERYWHERE), without antibiotics the next infection recurrence has developed into a permanent damage of urinal tract organs (which requires now 2 urological surgical operations), into undesirable autoimmune reaction that, possibly (together with infection) caused the intense arthritis attack (perhaps, with adjournment of salts), which, in turn, being left without treatment, caused some damage to hip, elbow, shoulder, and hand joint. And this took place while I verbally and even in writing depicted - in advance - to doctors the predicable consequences of their refusal of antibiotics and anti-inflammatory, and other medications and tests, and everything happened exactly as I predicted.

Concerning my family doctor, there is an obvious logical supposition that he had no authority to administrate antibiotics, anti-inflammatory, and tests AFTER the refusal of medical specialists - like Dr. Morris, or Dr. Krasny - to satisfy my demands of particular medications and tests, because, as a family doctor, he could not contest the decision of his colleagues-specialists.

Besides, he did so many countless favors to me, prescribing medications, administrating tests and exams, which were denied by other doctors, that simply exceeded all limits allowed to a single doctor by the ugly Canadian health care system, and this, probably, excuse and explains some of his most unethical refusals. Generally, I would keep silence about these facts, if not my duty to describe the truth adequately and honestly.


During one and a half years - from November, 2014 to March, 2016 - a patient with serious urological problems and in the middle of UTI recurrence and exacerbation - acute condition of the illness - could not get ANY complete blood-urine laboratory test, 1) because it was impossible to get a requisition from the doctors, and 2) because, when, finally, such tests were administrated, they were sabotaged by the laboratories. Isn't it an exhaustive proof of the practice of systematic undermining patient's health?!


It is also obvious that destroying my laboratory tests medical criminals were driven by 3 particular goals: 1) to withdraw a proof of an infection; and 2) to erase laboratory evidence of hyperuricemia, rheumatic factor abnormal indices, and arthritis revealing readings; and 3) to hide abnormal changes in blood formula.


CHAPTER 8.


April 20, 2015.

Here is another example (in reduction) of several faxes to medical doctors, in which I demanded antibiotics and other medications, blood-urine tests, and other exams (like ultrasound, etc.), and warned about serious consequences for my health caused by their systematic refusals to my demands.

This fax was sent by me on April 23, 2015 (see below) [in the Word format exists in 2-3 versions + in fax format in 2 versions] to my family doctor, Dr. Morris, and 2 more doctors; it is one of 2 fax versions:


To Dr...... (tel. 514-........);

to: fax: 514-....... /

From Lev Gunin (tel..........)

Dear Dr......!


In Nov. 25 - Dec. 10, 2014, you & Dr. Morris refused me wide-range antibiotics (like Protrin).

By the end of Nov. 2014 - untreated - infection most likely triggered a menacing autoimmune reaction.

On 26.11.2014, I came to Metro clinic assuming IgA vasculitis & asking for a specialized blood+urine tests.

On 27.11.2014, I was ridiculed at MGH Lab, transferred (from another employee) to an unfitted registration nurse, held ~ more than 1 hour at a momentary (normally) procedure, and sent away without urine test"s procedure. (........)

Coincidently?

In Dec. 2014 - Mar. 2014, I repeatedly asked you & Dr. Morris for antibiotics & (since 10.12.2014) anti-inflammatory med., referral to an osteo-specialist, and again was refused (atrocious l. elbow pain - since 28.12.2014, left wrist ~ 01.01.2015).

Only on 07.01.2015, you, doctor, sent me for l. elbow x-ray, which I postponed till March 4, 2015, as already having an unbearable left wrist"s pain wanted to do both x-rays simultaneously.

(Still, you did not agree to add l. wrist"s x-ray).

(The x-ray findings suggested l. elbow"s degenerative changes or fracture).

Since February = pain in my left shoulder; since March - hip neck.

You never told: 'NoX-= "no medication/treatment".

However, there was no need in any x-ray, as by Jan 7, 2015, it was obvious by pure observation that my left elbow is deformed, and wrist"s deformation - on its way [red, hot, painful, evidently slightly hypertrophied, movements-affected].

On Jan 7, 2015, you issued a "pre-requisition" for - blood-urine test - to do when needed.

On March 2 2015, having sudden dysuria & bladder" pain, I went to St.-Mary"s Hosp. Lab, providing a urine sample, but postponed blood test due to desire to add the rheumatology factor.

It looked like - on Apr. 3, 2014 - I was allowed to copy only 1 page of 02.03.2015 urine test report, but - on Apr. 17 (2015) - I discovered that other pages (incl. microbiology) never existed or were destroyed.

Before the test (Mar. 2, 2015) I received another stamped paper for blood test only & indication that the urine test was already done.

On Mar. 10, 2015, this + your requisition paper - were taken away by Lab"s workers. Strangely, later I saw your requisition paper (for above mentioned blood test) in my chart at your office.

When (10.04.2015) I came to St.-Mary"s Lab. with the paper given to me there on 02.03.2015, I was told to collect a urine sample (again?). I refused: to prevent a collision of 2 rapports.

Later, in the report, mentioning just microbiology, it was claimed that "patient refused to provide a urine sample". Was it a pure contradiction with the fact of urine sample collected for urinalysis" culture on Mar. 2, 2015?

Mar. 17, 2015, only 2 pages of 10.04.2015 blood test (+ alleged urinalysis) appeared in my chart at your office. What happened to other 11 pages?

In 2013-2014, Dr. Krasny"s secretaries claimed that never received my left foot MRI-scan [Jean-Talon Hospital (October 16, 2013)].

I failed to recover it from hospital's archive as well.

However, when recently I contacted Dr. Krasny's secretary, it looked like she saw it, but refused to reveal it to me.

Coming to Dr. Krasny on Apr. 21, 2015, I found out that my whole old-previous med. dossier (chart, file) does not exist anymore. Where it gone, or who destroyed it?

Similarly, I was allowed to obtain only 1-st page of my urinalysis" report [8-9 January, 2003 (MG Hospital), "Urinary tract infection"], and was not permitted to know about the specific infection"s agent that may trigger all further health problems.

I was never informed about that particular positive Lab"s finding, never prescribed medications.

These are just few of countless examples.

Concerning my left elbow"s x-ray (Mar. 4, 2015), it was sent to you by fax, but you claimed that never received it. If so, then the report - faxed to your office - has vanished "in the wires", or was stolen (an intrusion to your office once already took place). Do you remember - I came to St.-Mary"s archive & your office with my daughter on 17.04.2015?

Next day (Apr. 18, 2015) our car was hit by another car. Next day (Apr. 19, 2015) hackers attacked my comp.

Coincidently?

Why, if no infectious bacterial urine culture was found, there is a line "site: antibiotics", added to every of my urinalysis-microbiology?

I was told once by an MD that - as an "ideological enemy" - I am treated "too well". In the latest time, I was told by MDs that I am 1) "not allowed" antibiotics "any more", 2) "too often" doing blood tests, which cost 500 CD, 3) "hypochondriac", etc.

I still do not fully understand, why I had to ask to include the rheumatoid factor, etc. in my blood test requisition, and (regarding my years-old joints problem and its present super-acute stage) such components as Protein C-reactive, ESR Sedimentation, & Uric Acid, etc. should not been included automatically in my blood test"s paper.

As you know, I asked you for rheumatoid factor (RF) test on August 22, 2014, and was denied it.

I repeatedly asked for such test on December 12, 2015, when you finally gave me a referral for Complete Blood Count, as if RF is automatically included in CBC. However, when I came to the lab, and found out that it is not, I had to postpone the blood test, until you mention it in the requisition. (I did not even think to place a check-mark myself).

I always stressed to you & other MD-s that every recurrence of urinal tract infection was accompanied by bones-joints inflammation.

Since mid-March 2015 all urological problems abruptly vanished, giving way to a simultaneous more acute (then till that moment) inflammation-hypertrophy of joints.

I believe that the antibodies, acting against antigens as an antibiotic, attacked my bones.

From November-December 2014, to April 2015, you had enough time for - at least - some efforts to prevent a damage to my joints. But only on April 3, 2015, answering my 4-months-lasted insisting demands, you prescribed Naproxen, which did not work, because was given too late (when an initial acute stage of the disease might have been turned into a chronic stage) and was prescribed for only 1 week.

My left shoulder, elbow and wrist are already damaged. The biggest damage to my wrist occurred in 2-nd half of March - 1-st half of April, 2015, and continues right now.

Knowing for years that I am an advanced pianist and musical composer, you ignored my begging - and, as a result - now I can not play piano, and, who knows, may not be able to play piano any more. The whole joy of life, all colors of the world have disappeared. (...)

Still, what was done to me was done, and your moral and professional obligation is to compensate the damage. Ask your colleagues, find a way to stop my joints" degradation, minimize the injury.

Please, note that I deserved to be excused for maybe sometimes harsh judgment because escorted by police to medical institution; demonstratively followed, intercepted, stopped, questioned and searched by police hundreds times; I am under a heavy burden of pressure. As a victim of so called "profiling", I was asked to show my medical card many times while sitting in the waiting line before entering St.-Mary"s Lab, was stopped and questioned by security at Westmount Medical Building, etc.

Hope you did not find my message unfair.

Sincerely, Lev (Leon) Gunin. 23.04.2015.


The reproaches stated in this and other similar messages - as well as their severity, - were caused not only by what happened in 2015, but also by what was done to me in previous years.


Why it happened so that knowledgeable doctors and good people - like doctors Zygmund Zast and Piche - could not stop right at the beginning a urological infection (not only failing to prescribe antibiotics on their own initiative, but having refused antibiotics after my multiple demands; and having not taken additional effective measures for identification of particular infection; and ignoring the loss and falsification of laboratory analyses).


Also Dr. Rohan has treated this health problem rather with an indifference in the same years, as though suspected "hypochondria" in me, or assumed that I exaggerate the gravity of symptoms, or that they are just may be "delusional" in general.


Not only the surgeon, to whom Doctor Zast referred me, "kicked" me out with an extensive furunculosis and a cyst on my forehead, having refused its removal and having provoked the calcification, which damaged my forehead, but also doctors Puchie and Rohan. A big outgrowth (not just a cone), which disfigured my face, formed on my forehead. With my request for a forehead surgery I addressed to one female doctor of oriental origin at the external clinic of Queen Victoria hospital, also ineffectual.


Not only Doctor Piche has refused treatment of fat hepatosis, but also Doctor Rohan.


Not only Doctor Piche, Doctor Zast, and Doctor Nali have ignored the myocarditis for a long time, but also Doctor Rohan (1999-2005).


The same is concerning hyperkalemia and hypokalemia.


And it is only a small portion of problems, which it was possible to prevent easily, with very small and inexpensive methods, but doctors refused to do it. Was it their own guilt, or the guilt of the oppressive System?


Probably, I could cope with some of health problems independently (myself), without medical care, if I had means and resources. However, my social and economic status, and also politically motivated persecutions and police intimidation, administrative provocations and administrative terror - made this impossible.


Besides, a number of health problems resulted from the arranged injuries, road incidents (when I was hit by cars, bicycles and motorcycles), attacks by "unknown persons", and other consequences of terror and intimidation.


And, when - as result of numerous traumatic incidents (veins injuries, fractures, bruises, etc.) - I had to seek medical care: it was systematically denied and sabotaged.


April 21, 2015.

On April 21, 2015 (14.30), Tuesday, I had an appointment with rheumatologist, Dr. Ury Krasny.


In this transitional period, when the Royal Victoria Hospital was moved (by crooks, construction mafia, social segregation monsters, and cultural genocide executioners) from its historic building on Mont Royal to the new complex of buildings of the newly built hospital center on plateau Glen, - some of this hospital's offices were temporarily placed in Montreal General Hospital (MGH), including the office of rheumatology - Pavilion D, floor 19, room 102.


It became clear that my chubby chart - my medical file, - which Dr. Krasny kept within more than 10 years safe and integrally complete, has vanished: completely gone.


In this regard, Dr. Krasny, perhaps, was not able to make correct conclusions and diagnostic assumptions, and to appoint an adequate treatment and further preventive measures and tests.


And, certainly, not he "ordered" to misinterpret the reading of X-ray of the left wrist, and to refuse me a referral (requisition) on wrist's ultrasound, which - as he told me - he had to issue after X-ray; possibly, he ordered the ultrasound, but it was never given out to me.


A bit later, I received a notice that Dr. Krasny retires, and that, in this regard, I have to register in the reception with any other rheumatologist, from the list (which accompanied this message). However, Dr. Krasny, who had to retire approximately in 6 months, continued to treat other patients so far, but, immediately, excluded me from their number.

I appointed a rendezvous with doctor Krasny to May 5, 2015, but his secretary cancelled this rendezvous, under the pretext of the fact that he retires.

It means that Dr. Krasny, who retires only at the end of December, 2015, in violation of the law, unilaterally expelled me from his patients' number.


The referral to another rheumatologist - in connection with Dr. Krasny's retirement (see above); on the left side of this list we can see the date of the last exam by Dr. Krasny; it is specified: April 21, 2015.


See (below) the images of the next documents:


The X-ray of the left carpal bones-joints done after my visit to Dr. Krasny on April 21, 2015: the 1-st projection.

The X-ray of the left carpal bones-joints done after my visit to Dr. Krasny on April 21, 2015: the 2-nd projection.

The X-ray of the left carpal bones-joints done after my visit to Dr. Krasny on April 21, 2015: the 3-rd projection.

[all digital "negatives" received for a small fee on June 17, 2015 in HGM (MGH) hospital]


(I am omitting the X-Ray images in this edition, for saving space and volume, giving only 1 image, the most important (fragment) (see below).


The conclusion of the radiologist on X-ray of the left carpal joint made right after my visit to doctor Krasny on April 21, 2015: No obvious history of trauma; has redness over radial aspect of left wrist. No previous similar studies for comparison. No acute fracture or dislocation appreciated. No joint narrowing nor appreciable soft tissue.


The presence of 2 rare medical mistakes (the way of writing in one word "narrowingnor", and the lack of a dot at the end of the phrase) is a probable indication that the radiologist was in disagreement with what he was writing, being under pressure or threats, or in discord with his conscience. If so, this must be read: "Joint narrowing and soft tissue issues".

In radiologist's report, also the following details at once are evident:

1) The expression "no acute fracture" is not typical for such official reports. Usually, they write "no fracture", but not "no ACUTE fracture". Such a figure of speech causes suspicion that the author simply ignored the fact of NOT an acute fracture or other changed noticed by him. It can also mean that non-acute (healed) fracture could be suspected.

2) Judging by the form, this medical conclusion was written by a student. If so: why? And WHY MY X-Ray?

3) I don't know, whether it is a normal practice - the fact that the whole 3 surnames appear in this official report (apart from the doctor who directed this X-Ray reading). At the same time, for some reasons, there is no mention of the technician-radiologist, who was directly carrying out the procedure of X-ray. Perhaps, it is unusual by the norm and standard.

4) It is unusual for this establishment that, while the X-ray was done on April 21, 2015, only 3 days later - on April 23, 2015 - a preliminary report was issued, and the final report is dated the 8-th of May, 2015. Except my own x-ray reports, I saw my mother's, my wife's, many samples on Internet, etc., but such a "delayed" (for 18 days!) report does not meet overage norms for this radiology. Therefore, there is a natural suspicion that the initial evaluation and report of this X-ray was ready, as usual, within 6-24 hours, but later the document was rewritten on April 23, 2015, and, then - once again - was rewritten on May 8, 2015. Perhaps, the procedure of copying (falsification) of initial result was undertaken only 1 time (May 8, 2015).


See below: the requisition on blood test written out by doctor Krasny on April 21, 2015.


For inexplicable reasons, doctor Krasny did not include the urinal hyperuricemia analysis in this requisition, and other components, as a rule, checked doctors-rheumatologists, i.e. everything that could shed light on what happens to me, what is causing arthritis attacks, and what is the medical diagnosis.


April 22, 2015.

During my last visit to Dr. Morris (March 3, 2015), after my desperate requests, he, finally, prescribed antibiotics and alpha-blocker. But - instead of a broader spectrum antibiotic - and 2 alpha blockers of 2 different types - he prescribed a standard Cipro and only an alpha-blocker relaxant. Besides, he prescribed a generic version of this alpha-blocker, which, I warned him, my organism does not "accepts".

Due to this alpha blocker, there is one more tangled question.

On the prescription, written out by Dr. Morris, it was clearly written (like printed) "Xand". But Xand is a drug, which is used for treatment of psychiatric patients. Thus, if it is so, then, in that case, Dr. Morris already not just floutingly, but also with a provocative subtext (instead of responding to my request (as he claimed, when signed this prescription paper and, simultaneously, telling that this is a generic version of Flomax) for alpha blockers) - provocatively wrote "Xand". So, without my consent, and fraudulently calling "Xand" "Alfuzosin", he illegally prescribed forbidden in this situation drug.

By then, my assumption did not go beyond a supposition that Dr. Morris has committed this incredibly unethical act for simply dropping a hint about my alleged "inadequate personality", symbolically pretending that my demands of REAL treatment are merely a product of hypochondria, and, by this, to justify his refusal of lab tests and antibiotics (when they were needed in periods of acute UTIs), Flomax, surgery, etc. Unfortunately, I wrongly excluded a likelihood that he planned to inflict an actual bodily harm and destroy my psychic by prescribing a harmful (for people without serious psychiatric problems) medication that I don't need, which, probably, contraindicated for me. Xand (if it is really a psychiatric drug) could - by its action and side effects - change my behavior, reactions, personality, and so on, turning me into a mentally impair person, and, by using this dirty trick, a bunch of medical criminals could pretend to "prove" my "mental inadequacy".

To this, it is necessary to add strange female druggist's behavior in the drugstore, who, in response to my statement that this is, allegedly, a remedy of an alpha-blocker, and to my request to name the medication (specified in the prescription), and to explain its action and purpose, at first disappeared - together with the prescription, and then, having appeared, told: "Get the medicine - and you'll learn it".

She had no intention to return the prescriptions at all!

On my request to give me back the prescription - she again disappeared (with it) somewhere, and did not appear any more.

Whether it means that - in drugstore - having realized that a famous doctor-urologist and - at the same time - an important-influential member of city's medical administration - prescribed to his patient a psychiatric drug without patient's consent and knowledge - given out for alpha-blocker, they got in touch - over phone - with Dr. Morris or his secretary, and those, understanding - what a scandal threatens them, urgently submitted another prescription (of a usual alpha blocker), telling the pharmacists to confiscate the original paper?

This hypothesis is likely confirmed by the appearance of male pharmacist, who came to me instead of his female colleague, who told me that Xand is a psychiatric drug, and asked me if I've expected to be prescribed particularly this (which I denied). Probably, their first call to Dr. Morris's office was unanswered, and, meanwhile, the pharmacist tried to clear up the situation.


See below: photocopies of both prescriptions, which Dr. Morris wrote out on April, 22, 2015.


2 prescriptions written by doctor Morris in April, 2015 according to which it was necessary to receive unwillingly an explanation above) not those drugs which I asked, and, besides, late for months. Scanned in April, 2015.


April 23, 2015.

At the end of April, during my "after-hour" visit to my family doctor, I complained about the short term of last Naproxen prescription (on April 3, 2015), and asked to prescribe Naproxen for a longer term.

Doctor agreed, and wrote out the prescription.

However, in the pharmacy, they claimed that, if last time my family doctor prescribed Naproxen at least on 2 times (2 weeks), then, now - for only 1 time (for 7 days). This contradicted to their previous claim that the medication was prescribed for only 1 week by then. Something weird was going on again.

How should it have been understood?


Meanwhile, during the periods, free of acute UTI or arthritis attacks, in last 2 or 3 years, I ceased pay my family doctor too frequent visits, coming to him only when neither a doctor in a walk-in clinic, nor a doctor-specialist, nor in CLSC, nor in ER-s - they did not want, or could not solve any given health problem, under a pretext that "WITH THIS" "you have to see your family doctor". And, if, during some periods, I visited him more often - that only because, during my previous visit, he ignored (or was not able to solve) serious health problems, and - from serious - they turned into VERY serious.


However, this continuing incident in the pharmacy shed more lights at the whole mechanism of the medical help sabotage.


This time, my family doctor again prescribed Naproxen for 2 weeks, but, in the pharmacy, they refused to accept the 2-weeks course, and restricted the therapy by 1 week only.


See below: Naproxen, prescribed by my family doctor family doctor for 2 weeks and received in drugstore on April 23, 2015 with a label the "last" (only) time".


My attempt to receive in the pharmacy an extension at least for 1 week (on one packing (jar) of Naproxen) terminated in the angry inscription of the pharmacist "ARRETER" ("to stop!" - fr.). Besides, in the pharmacy, they claimed that contacted my attending physician (my family doctor), and he said that he categorically will not renew the Naproxen prescription even for another week. There were same 2 female workers, who sabotaged my access to Naproxen the previous time.


Next day, I came again to the pharmacy, and demanded to speak to a supervisor. However, my demand was ignored, and, during next 2 weeks I could not speak to a senior pharmacist. It became clear that these 2 women do the dirty work, and other employers have the pangs of conscience, and don't want to participate in government's crimes.


My family doctor, prescribing the anti-inflammatory, said that this time the prescription is "for a longer time than the previous prescription of Naproxen", and, when I asked "more than for 2 weeks?", he, as it seemed to me, nodded with confirmation. In the prescription paper, the digit "3" in the line "repeat" was encircled. This prompts an only possible conclusion: that the government stopped the prescription, forcing as the pharmacy, as my family doctor to cancel it.


In desperation, understanding that my bones and joints will be destroyed by ab acute inflammation of the arthritis attack, and, in 5-7 years (maximum) I'll not be able to function (if not in 1-2 years!), I sent a fax to my family doctor. But the worse thing is that - in 6-8 months - my quality of life will drastically change, because - without medical treatment - arthritis will progress, and I'll not be able to ride a bike, to dance, to play piano, etc.


See below: fax (sent to my family doctor on April 23, 2015 (14:40) info. We can see on fax-machine's display that the message was sent successfully.


Even a whole detective agency hardly could clear up to the end a heap of terrible events (especially taking into consideration that, by then, I did not have yet a full picture, and a layer later information, which in general changed corps of my understandings), so, there is nothing surprising that I - on fresh events - sent one more fax message (which is very strictly characterizing what has occurred) to my family doctor. But I can be understood: actually, the whole medical care was stopped for me; medications were prescribed in months after they were necessary; my blood-urine tests were sabotaged; pharmacies blocked my access to medications.


------------------------------------------------


April 27, 2015.

Less plentiful hematuria, and etc. "haemo".


April 28, 2015.

This this a blood test requisition of Dr. Krasny (who wrote it out on April 21, 2015).

Apparently, this specialist-rheumatologist "forgot" to place the checkmarks beside the majority of counts, which are usually noted by rheumatologists for finding out the cause and right diagnosis of bones-joints pathology. (See the image below).


Blood test report from April 28, 2015, on Dr. Krasny requisition (administrated on April 21, 2015). One of the most "remarkable" blood tests.


April 29, 2015.

On Wednesday, at 15:00, I got on reception to dermatologist, concerning an acute skin inflammation around the outer side of the hand joint - struck with some type of arthritis.

She was surprised, when, simultaneously, I showed the lack of 2 spots of seborrhea keratosis. She asked, how I managed to "erase" them, and, apparently, did not believe in my explanation. She, probably, was thinking that the "spots" were removed surgically. It's a pity...

It became clear that she retires. It is also a pity. In this French-speaking woman, and another doctor, a Chinese origin, I had 2 more guardian angels - besides, not just decent people, but very professional dermatologists.

What happened to doctor Wang, I had so far neither time, nor an opportunity to find out.

She is still a young woman, hardly prepares to retire, and it is difficult to assume why the phone of her private clinic does not answer.

And Dr. St.-Jacques is also not an elderly woman; at her age people still to work and work.

Simultaneous retirement of 4 doctors, who were treating me, is very suspicious.

Not therefore they retire because these people considered impossible continuation of the medical practice under Harper-Trudeau regime, in conditions, when doctors are turned into executioners, and the medical system is transformed from altruistic to sadistic?

So, on April 29, 2015, during my visit to Dr. Marie St.-Jacques, I received a written notice of her planned retirement:


The notice of retirement of Dr. Marie St.-Jacques. (See below).


Doctor Marie St.-Jacques turned out to be a very decent person even considering the access by patients to their dossiers. I could receive in her office EVERYTHING, to every record and page.


__________


Lev Gunin


THE PUNITIVE HEALTH CARE

[HEALTH CARE AS A REPRESSIVE TOOL]


BOOK 5-7


THE UROLOGICAL DRAMA. PART 7. [Apr. 2015]


CONTENT


Chapter 1.

Chapter 2.

Chapter 3.

Chapter 4.


__________


* * *


The whole text of the chronological events and medical documents (under the name of "The Punitive Health Care - (Health Care as a Repressive Tool)" is available for examination only on the basis of the following contract between the author and the reader:


I (THE READER) GIVE MY CONSENT THAT, BY CLICKING CORRESPONDING LINKS AND ACCESSING THE TEXT OF "THE PUNITIVE HEALTH CARE", I AUTOMATICALLY AGREE TO THE FOLLOWING PRELIMINARY CONDITIONS [FOR READING]:


-- I am (at least) 18 years old.


1. I (the reader) is undertaking (commit myself) not to distribute the text of "The Punitive Health Care - (Health Care as a Repressive Tool)" - entirely, or in fragments; not to copy medical documents; and not to share the text and images without author' permission.


2. I (the reader) understand that the confidential information, which is contained in this text, cannot be used for any other [than the reading (extraneous; secondary)] purposes and needs, for any researches, essays, stories, etc.


3. I (the reader) commit myself not to sneer at open ticklish personal information (which sharing was induced by circumstances), not to savor any medical, physiological, or anatomic details, and not to use this text as a reason for mockery and persecution.


4. I (the reader) am warned by the author that, except for a number of obviously immoral (by definition) doctors' and medical staff's actions, other decisions and acts described in this "confession" are not subjected to hasty moral assessment because a) only experts can judge finally about their justification and fairness; b) explanations and vindications of other party are necessary. We also do not know to what degree the doctors were under an influence and direct power of police, Ministry of Immigration, and other enforcement agencies, political organizations, groups and persons - with their own ideological, economic, and propaganda interests, - and to what degree this influence impacted on their diagnostic conclusions and assessments of patient's state of health. Many of the documentary confirmed facts incontestably demonstrate that author's ideological stand (who's opposing to younger generation's transformation into zombie-biorobots with mobile phones on shoulders instead of heads; to electronic totalitarianism with its prison-like total video surveillance; and to the tyrannical political censorship) played nearly a major role in enraging the authorities and triggering the persecutions.


5. I (the reader) am warned that the author sees the main cause of the most dramatic (for him) events in the fact that the enforcement agencies and interested persons and groups managed to present him to the medical community as an individual incapable to evaluate his health condition objectively; as a health-consciousan (or hypochondriac); an extremist; a troublemaker; an individual obsessed with panic and alarm patterns; as a person, who is making unreal demands to the system of medical care - concerning his - allegedly - pseudo-maladies and exaggerated gravity of trivial indispositions. This smear campaign of defamation, scurrilous libel, and wicked calumny made impossible receiving an adequate medical care (and sometimes any medical help at all), and led to health undermining, numerous diseases, incidents, and unnecessary sufferings. Doctors also considered difficult to believe in continuous (not connected with each other) illnesses, with an interval of 4-7 days, sometimes rolling at the same time: as tsunami. They refused to believe in these sequences of illnesses' painful course, danger, and significance. This chronicle disproves such a prejudiced opinion, producing an incontestable evidence.


6. I (the reader) am informed that all negative remarks, characteristics, and facts' assessments belong only to the portrayal of criminal groups, extremists, and carriers of anti-humanistic, racist, and totalitarian ideology, but do not contain groundless generalizations and negative assessment of any country, ethnic group, or religion. The author is categorically against dismantling of any of the existing states, and against restrictions of the rights of religious congregations of any faith.


7. I (the reader) am informed that this edition partially presents the previous 2017 edition without any changes, and, thus, may not correspond to later view and opinions.


8. I (the English reader) am informed that some parts of the following English text of "The Punitive Health Care" - were translated from Polish, Russian, or French originals, and may contain primitive language, double interpretation, or puzzled meaning. Such confusing fragments should be compared with their originals in Polish and Russian languages (author's native languages) [2016-2017]; all controversial points must be resolved through such a comparison.


9. In the very last moment of this edition's make-up (April 2023), the author came across a description of so-called Havana-syndrome, and found same symptoms and complications, which he experienced when was attacked by an unknown remote weapon (3 Nov. 2005, 7 Jan. 2013, and 21 June 2016), and developed symptoms of post-microwave irradiation.


_________


CHAPTER 1.


2015.


APRIL 24, 2015.


THE FIRST FRAGMENT


At least, 10 reasons forced me to go - on April 24, 2015 - to emergency room of Montreal General Hospital (MGH, or HGM in French).


The intolerable pain in the left wrist, accompanied by a serious dermatosis; pain and already restricted mobility of left shoulder; lack of any explanations from doctors, and "0" (Zero) diagnoses concerning harsh arthritis attacks; lack of a distinct summary of the left wrist joint's X-ray; incorrect, in my opinion, interpretation of the left elbow's X-ray; loss of the a number of lab tests that could clear the causes of UT infection and arthritis - together with dangerous autoimmune reaction as its serious complications; any plan, any intention of medical workers concerning treatment of urological problems and arthritis (I was literally thrown to the wolves-illnesses; the last anti-inflammation therapy was appointed too late (in response to my VERY persistent demands), and not by the rheumatologist, but by my family doctor for only 3 weeks, but the pharmacy stopped it, blocked the access to Naproxen, restricting its course by only 1 (!) week); the rheumatologist, Dr. Krasny, having written out a requisition on lab analyses, "forgot" to include tests for arthritis, rheumatology factors, hyperuricemia (!); my whole medical chart and the report of the magnetic-resonant scan (MRI) disappeared from Dr. Krasny's office (who soon - in general - "expelled" me off the list of his patients).


In MGH's ER, nurse's reaction to my request to authorize my short absence in ER for my visit to hospital's laboratory - unexpectedly resulted in her aggravated aggression and hostility.


I said that I have - with me - a requisition for laboratory tests, and - while waiting for medical help in ER - I wish to pass the tests. She said that I, allegedly, are "doing already too many lab tests" (exactly as Dr. Morris used to accuse me), and I responded that I am doing as many tests as needed, and added that, sometimes, I have to repeat lab tests, because the tests disappear. And then I started to list my complaints about the sabotage of the access to medical help.


My message can be stated in two words: the refusal of drug treatment of another recurrence of UT infection causing a dangerous autoimmune reaction, which, in turn, provoked the attack of serious arthritis that threatening my physical functionality; arthritis was accompanied by torture of an intolerable pain. Plus, my requests to administrate anti-inflammatories - were ignored; my lab analyses vanished; the prescribed Naproxen was stopped by the pharmacy, and the summaries of X-rays were distorted.

I also listed my expectations from my current visit to ER and my demands: to set, at last, a diagnosis (to diagnose a precise particular form of arthritis and its causes); to revise the results (report) of X-rays; to appoint an essential treatment; and to administrate medical treatment plan in general.


On my way to the hospital, I was followed by Dodge Caravan of silvery color, with number FHV9525, and at the exit - the same vehicle "waited" from Cedar Street.


On my way home twice the police car 80-42 Chevrolet with number FHV5375 appeared. In my home area, Dodge Caravan 15-1 police car, with number FHV4715 appeared; the Dodge Caravan of silvery color, with number FHV9525 appeared again near my home.


Main events of that Friday of April 24, 2015, are described in my written statement, which I sent (on June 10, 2015) to the ombudsman (to the commissioner on complaints' revision) of affiliated with McGill University medical faculty's medical institutions (some of next fragments are given below in English and French originals, some other fragments - in my own (author's) translation from my comments and notes in Russian and Polish languages, and from my earlier (2016) Russian version of this work):


[Unfortunately, there is no full sureness that this version for all 100 percent coincides with that that I sent addressing to Ombudsman of MUHC hospitals, but in different versions the distinction makes only several words; besides, as I consider, the general sense in these parts anyways remains the same].


P.S. In addition - the full list of documents on this correspondence.


Here is it:


1. The complaint letter to MGH's ombudsman, Mister Pascal Valois, sent on June 10, 2015.

2. The confirmation message - that my complaint was received by Mr. Pascal Valois, generated on June 16, 2015. It contains only the message upon delivery of my complaint letter to his office. Besides, to the same category of documents belong all automatically generated messages from the same office about receiving my e-mails with the attached files of the complaint (which I duplicated - sending the same complaint by fax).

3. Phone call from the assistant to persons responsible for the procedural course of my complaint (in McGill's medical institutions' network). [The technician-administrator at Charles Gauthier, who is responsible for the access to information and protection of safety of personal data in McGill's medical institutions.] She dictated (to me) Robert Cox's address and described the template of the format of my appeal to his office. I asked to send me information in writing, and, despite her dissatisfied tone, she nevertheless agreed, having written down e-mail address dictated by me and my fax number. I warned that - before sending me a fax - it is necessary to contact me by phone, because I have to turned on the fax, which is not connected 24 hours a day (sharing the line with my telephone), but is activated in case of need. [---The requisites and details of this call and its audio recording got lost among a huge set of documents, but over time I hope to find them. Offhand I can tell on memory that Madam Rea called me approximately on June 18-19, 2015.---] The need of a preliminary call before faxing irritated Madam Nadia Rea, and she offered a way of communication via e-mail. Even earlier, I dictated to her my email address, and received (from her) (on July 15, 2015 - in a month after sending my appeal to Mr. Robert Cox) a letter with a message from Mr. Charles Gauthier.

4. On June 20, 2015 (duplicated on June 22 and 23, 2015, by fax and e-mail) I sent a letter to Mr. Cox's address (dictated by phone by Madam Nadia Rhea).

In this letter I demanded to find out:

"1) If there are any references to my political, ideological, or any other type of views and beliefs in my file at McGill University"s (or affiliated with McGill) medical institutions.

2) If there are any references to my social and financial status.

3) If there are any references to my alleged psychological, psychiatric, or neurologic "disorders".

4) If there are any references to my alleged "conflicts" with medical doctors or institutions.

5) If there are any references to my ethnic origin and my Immigration file. If there are any indications of information about me in Internet. If - while accessing my file - any MD would see something special, like "social anxiety or delusion", "neurologic disorder", etc.

5. In response to my message, I received (on July 15, 2015) a message from Mr. Charles Gauthier (and - that is of great importance - even BEFORE receiving any answer from Mr. Pascal Valois, i.e. BEFORE ANY REPLY to my complaint concerning the incident in MGH's Emergency Room, i.e., otherwise, in the absence of the basic answer). In his message, Mr. Gauthier was reporting that, under the law on access to information (paragraph 2), the authorities are obliged to answer to my demand within 20 days from the date of receiving the demand; this was followed by the summary of the paragraphs of the law on access to information.

However, this letter should be considered biased and indirectly warning about the unwillingness of the authorities to open (for me) an access to my personal data - because, from nearly 100 of paragraphs and points of the law, not those main principles - that guarantee and provide the rights of citizens to access information - were deliberately chosen, but only those that justify a delay of the authorities' reply or cunning tricks that block citizens' access to documents.

It is necessary to pay special attention that - already having the text of my address, - Mr. Charles Gauthier did not mention that it is made counter with the legal procedure (and rules of such an inquiry), and, so, judging by his acceptation, my demands had to be satisfied.

However, I did not receive any answer to my demand.

Having attentively studied the laws and having seen several cases in the courts of different instances concerning the access to information, I came to a conclusion that - under the law - there are no reasons in refusal of my request, and, moreover, having shifted on me the legal procedures - which are not provided by rules and order of submission of complaints by patients of medical institutions, and, besides - belong to an absolutely other area, than the main line and essence of my complaint, the above-mentioned persons broke if not a letter of the law, then its essence, not to mention about justice. Why, having special powers, experience, skills and knowledge, the controllers (commissioners) did not request for me (or in my name [if my signature is necessary - it is not a problem]) the demanded documents, or did not see those documents and did not send me a short summary? There is only one answer: because the authorities would not like AT ALL that I saw any written records concerning my political (ideological) views (or my Immigration case, or my origins, or my socio-economic status, or police surveillance, and so on) in my medical file.

They intend to play for time, and, if needed - possibly, to destroy the documentary evidence about politicization of my medical file.

6. The letter from Mister Robert Cox personally (it was hardly just formally from his name from his secretariat (on July 30, 2015), in which it was told that Mister Cox is temporarily absent, and will be back at the office only after some time. Such a message assumed that - after return to his office - Mister Cox or someone from his assistants will give me the concrete answer to my inquiry, i.e. having provided to me the requested information, or having sent a written refusal. But neither that, nor another followed. And, in half a year, and later after 20 days specified in the letter of mister Gauthier, no reply was sent to me. In other words, the outright sabotage followed: the lawlessness.

7. The reply from Mister Pascal Valois, (allegedly) on July 29, 2015 [actually, this reply had to be sent much later], artificially divided my complaint on:

1) demand of written apology from the triage nurse, and

2) request for access to information.

In the context of this specific case, such a division can be considered illegal and ineligible, and its motives could be interpreted: strident unwillingness to open (for me) an access to my personal medical data.

Besides, my demands were divided into 2 different spheres without my consent and BEFORE receiving any answer from Mister Pascal Valois, who only stated the refusal on my demand to receive a written apology from the triage nurse, and also did not offer any explanation (that was also included into my demands) or assessment of initiated by the triage nurse illegal psychiatric evaluation, and did not explain on what basis she raised a question of the presence in me, allegedly, a thirst for suicide and murder.

8. My reaction to the answer of Mister Pascal Valois, on August 27, 2015. (Though the answer of Mr. Valois did not suit me, I could not but thank him for his personal contribution to elimination of potential consequences for me generated by nurse' provocation).

9. It should be noted especially that the documents received by me from officials arrived much later than - logically - had to arrive. (Especially it concerns the documents coming by mail, which I received for 10, and even 15 days after the date specified in these documents... One matter, when such private individual as I am, submit (on combination of circumstances) the official letter for 1-2 days later (that for an ordinary person - with his limited opportunities - is normal), and quite another matter, when official institutions send their letters for several weeks after the deadline specified by the law. While the access for me to my medical data is blocked, and it is necessary to beat out each document with fight, unlimited access to my medical files is open the third parties!).


In general, the usage of the health care system for provocations against patients-dissidents; for discrediting patients' political or ideological views or believes; for covering up politically-motivated beatings, attacks, or staged road accidents; and for extortion of dissidents' "inadequate" reactions, statements, etc., - when they are at strong pain and in a pitiful health condition: it is a vicious and one of the most sophisticated and refine kind of torture. It is especially applied to ER rooms, and, especially, to triage rooms, because such actions of the triage nurses are equal to the actions of KGB, Gestapo, or Guantanamo slayers, when they tortured political or war prisoners.


- 1 -

To: MGH Ombudsman ombudsman@much.mcgill.ca

MUHC Office of the Ombudsman Montreal,

1650 Cedar Room E6.164 Montreal, Qc, H3G 1A4

Pascale Valois, tel. 514-934-1934 ext 44285.


From Lev Gunin (address, phone, the fax, number

of the hospital and medical identity card)


The first (1-st) page of this document:


(see below)


The second (2-nd) page of this document:


(see below)


The third (3-rd) page of this document:


(see below)


The forth (4-th) page of this document:


(see below)


The fifth (5-th) page of this document:


(see below)


Here are copies of some other documents [see below];

(please, be so kind as to recognize that even if such false diagnosis as "tuberculosis" could be fabricated, it is much easier to fabricate a false diagnosis of mental or neurologic disorders):


[see below]


1. Case of compulsory fluorography of IM (200-2001). Only on the basis of this fluorography, in official documents the diagnosis "Tuberculosis" appeared. Access to the original medical document or its copy, or to the x-ray was blocked for me, and for civil [civil, not immigration] doctors and lawyers. [It was declared later that "the tubercular fluorography is lost ("missing").]

2. After uncountable letters of doctors to Immigration department, in which the possibility of TB (tuberculosis) was ruled out (Immigration rejected them later as "not a proof"), a new X-ray was done:


As a result, the immigration fluorography "was not found" (when it was demanded by me and one of my lawyers).


As it is possible to see, this "civil" x-ray absolutely normal (see above).


But also immigration department did not recognize this X-ray as "an evidence", sticking to the "tuberculosis" diagnosis and demanding from me - not looking at any facts and reasons - "to undergo treatment for tuberculosis".


In her letter, an immigration official "did not recognize" the civil X-ray, and continued to insist on the conclusion of the immigration fluorography (already announced "lost"!) used as the one and only pretext (actually: a forgery!) for insinuations of government officials (see below):


[2b. Addition; Post-factum: Thus, having received the result of the civil X-ray, which disproved any tubercular insinuations, the immigration official, who was set on me by her administration, instead of the cancellation of the order of compulsory "treatment" at the Infectious Diseases Unit, which consequences (produced by the counterfeited fluorography) could be the most ominous, sent that letter, in which called in question the identity of the civil X-ray.

With a palpable irritation and fury (read even in the graphic arrangement and the nature of this (see above) hand-written text) she stated wild insinuations that - supposedly - not I could pass this X-ray, but someone else could pass it instead of me, and, on this illegal basis, left the former command to surrender to the Infectious Diseases Unit in force.

The absurdity of her insinuations is obvious: I passed this X-ray with my personal documents registered in the laboratory Clark, like the identification document of the state health insurance, where there is my photo, my name, my birthday data, etc.

On the basis of the above-mentioned letter of the immigration official from Ottawa, another female immigration official - from Montreal's IMM bureau - immediately called me - and again demanded to comply, executing all paragraphs of the "tubercular" letter, threatening, otherwise, to put me into the Immigration prison.

In turn, I - with great difficulties - made a copy of the original "civil" X-ray (the picture), and sent it (in addition to other medical documents, which categorically ruled out the tuberculosis) to immigration department, with a comment, in which specified that the identity of this X-ray is visible already at least on features of my personal specific anatomic building, and, in particular, on pectus excavatum.

Besides, I met United Nation's Human Rights Commissioner, and, thanks to her, this "tubercular swindle" of Canadian Federal Immigration was put to an end.]


3. A Counterfeit blood test (see below) on VDRL (on venereal diseases), which I never passed.

This alleged blood test appeared soon after the 1-st episode of charges of Immigration that I, as if, concealed such "infectious diseases" as VDRL (HIV, etc.), hepatitis B, tuberculosis, etc. - at entry into Canada.


3b. The hand-written remark specifies - in the left top corner - that this form of the blood test requisition is connected to the procedures of Immigration Medical Services Department.

There is Dr. Giannakis's stamp, but his signature is absent.

In all other requisitions and prescriptions of Dr. Giannakis his signature was present.

4. The result of this counterfeit blood test was attributed to the requisition, which original was never issued to me (see below).

If someone else took it from Doctor Giannakis or his secretary - it was not me, because I never saw it and never held it in my hands, never went to CDL Labs Laboratories to pass this test, and did not pay the specified 18 dollars.

This result, coming out from a non-existing blood sample, was connected with non-existing - for my part - requisition.

As soon as I learned about such "analysis", I immediately sent - by fax - my protest to Laboratories CDL.

However, CDL Labs' administration closed for me an access to other pages and documents (besides this receipt), and did not show me the printout of the result-report's reading (of this fake analysis on VDRL).

After my persistent inquiries, this, alleged "test" - was declared "missing".


The handwritten mark specifies in the left top corner of the document that this requisition (on blood test) - is related to the office of the procedures of Immigration Medical Services of the Federal (Canadian) Ministry of Immigration.

There is doctor Giannakis's stamp, but his personal signature is absent...

[I will add that in other - original - documents, issued by Doctor Giannakis his signature is everywhere.]


5. Incomplete Urinalysis (see above) of January 8, 2003.

"Urinary tract infection" assumes the identification of the agent (bacterium), or the printout of biochemical indicators, which combination and separate values are associated with an infection, but there is no information or explanation any more.

Besides, there have to be other pages, which are absent.

Suffering from frequent UTI infections, I tried to find them (other pages) in Medical Archive, but several months (2003) later I managed to receive only this - unique - page again.

In 2005, it was said to me that there is no urinalysis from January 7-9, 2003 in my file any more.

At last, the letter from Medical Archive of April 29, 2015, says that " there is no analysis of urine of January 8, 2003 in your file" [From myself, I will add that, declaring the questionnaire to the worker of the archive, I again orally asked to check data for dates from January 7 to January 9, 2003, but nothing was found]:


6. According to the enclosed document (see below), the above specified analysis "does not exist" (having requested the copy of this analysis from archive, I specified on Jan. 7-9, 2003 as the date of sample's collection):


7. 2015: only 1 page of other urinalysis (02-03-2015) - the physical and chemical analysis - survived.

Such indicators as microbiology (bacterial culture), uric acid, and other indicators and components are absent (see below).


After my attempts to learn what happened to other pages (fragments), this urinalysis also "disappeared" from my medical file, from the medical archive, and from all other sources, replaced by an "alleged" (counterfeit) one (see 1+ the page below), which, since that moment, "was attributed" to the same requisition.


See below - the requisition of Dr. Rohan on this analysis (here are the analysis' components [which were lost in this analysis's result-report] checked by the doctor) before it was giving in to the laboratory's registration window:


(see below)


The photo of the same requisition AFTER the marks made in the laboratory during the urine test registration is presented in the previous part (book) of this work. See below - the original result of the urine test on this requisition, signed by Dr. Rohan in February, 2015:


The right copy is a printout from Sante Quebec's database. This file (document) has later disappeared from this database as well. In the left top corner (under document's details) it is printed "patient to return for blood tests", so, it is absolutely clear I will come for the blood test with the same requisition, and I came on April 10, 2015 (the delay explained in the previous part (book) of this work).

A "suggested" (fabricated) urinalysis, which was "attributed" to this test (on the same requisition, written out in February, 2015) after 10-04-2015:


(I will repeat that this counterfeit analysis, besides, was attributed to requisition from February, 2015, and replaced that original test from 2-3-2015 - after 10-4-2015).


And, at last, the same requisition, which "materialized" on Dr. Rohan's table AFTER this whole "story" (the 2-nd page attached to it: it was an additional printout, where it was specified that the urine test is already passed, and now it remains only the blood test; the same is stated inside the original requisition: we can see the highlighted (by a yellow felt-tip pen) section of the Complete Blood Count (CBC) [pointed to not passed yet blood test], and crossed out urine test section [which means: done]; on 2-3-2015, there was also a notice written by a pencil, which now disappeared (erased - or eliminated by a chemical method?). THIS document was taken away in St.-Mary's Hospital's laboratory on April 10, 2015, and had to stay there, but "mysteriously" "materialized" in doctor's office (at his table):


I can provide more examples (if you consider that these are still not enough for the proof that malicious manipulations with my laboratory and other tests - not a product of mine "sick imagination").


Sincerely yours, Lev (Leon) Gunin. June 10, 2015.


The shocking provocation in MGH (HGM - fr.) ER on April 24, 2015, provoked by the triage nurse, on style and methods reminds the style and methods of the triage nurse on October 3, 2007, in St.-Mary's Hospital to such an extent that, since April 25, I asked a question more than once: whether this nurse - Joanna Priestley - participated both in the 1-st, and in the 2-nd provocation?


Having inquired about madam Joanna Priestley, I found out that before MGH (HGM - fr.) she worked as a triage nurse in the English Children's Hospital at Tuper Street (and Rene-Levesque-Dorchester).


Any data is not available about whether she worked in 2007 in St.-Mary's Hospital.


In the official report from 3-rd of October, 2007, the name of the triage nurse is not printed, but entered via handwriting. The name precisely coincides with "J" (Joanna) initial; as for a surname - in my opinion, it was "painted" something similar to "Priestley".


But even if there were 2 different personalities - such a complete match of style and methods means that they were trained and skilled by a same person: a police officer, or an agent of intelligence agencies. In my opinion, it is indisputable.


This provocation was preceded by 3 illegal attempts to carry out my psychiatric evaluation in medical offices of doctors Ivan Rohan, Makeda Semret, and Yury Krasny, without my permission and consent (see the previous events' records).


The most interesting question is: on whose initiative were carried out these lawlessness examinations.


CHAPTER 2.


The letter with the complaint about the event in Montreal General Hospital's ER on April 24, 2015, was sent on June 10, 2015, by the fax and e-mail to Monsieur Pascal Valois; here (below) is a copy of some requisites and details of this letter:


Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 20:46:00 -0400 [08:46:00 PM EDT]

From: leog@total.net

To: ombudsman@muhc.mcgill.ca

Cc: leog@total.net

Subject: To MGH Ombudsman [control]

Part(s): 2 to_MGH_Ombudsman.pdf 8 MB

Download in .zip Format Download

All Attachments (in .zip file)

Download All Attachments (in .zip file)

1 unnamed 0 KB ||


To: From: MGH Ombudsman Lev GUNIN

ombudsman@much.mcgill.ca

MUHC Office of the Ombudsman

1650 Cedar Room E6.164 Montreal, Qc H3G 1A4

Pascale Valois, tel. 514-934-1934 ext 44285.


From: Lev GUNIN leog@total.net


For security reasons, the message is sent as an attachment in a pdf-format.


...........


I had to send this e-mail of 18 (!) times because - when I sent it - sending my e-mail was blocked, the Internet was at once switched off then, and there were other problems.


Here (below) one of examples:


Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 20:20:49 -0400 [08:20:49 PM EDT]

From: Mail Delivery System

To: leog@total.net Subject: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender

Error ERROR: Your message could not be delivered. The mail server generated the following error message: This is the mail system at host mail-1.ca.inter.net. I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not be delivered to one or more recipients. It's attached below. For further assistance, please send mail to postmaster. If you do so, please include this problem report. You can delete your own text from the attached returned message.

The mail system: Host or domain name not found.

Name service error for name=much.mcgill.ca type=A:

Host not found Info Additional message error details can be viewed HERE.

The text of the returned message can be viewed HERE.


It is hardly worth doubting that these diversions and provocations were connected with my complaint concerning the incident (on April 24, 2015) in Emergency Room of Montreal General Hospital.


This incident is described by me in the separate series stating the persecution facts on social, administrative, network (shutdowns of the Internet and phone) lines, police intimidation, etc., levels.


I will not begin to give my own assessment to the letter of Mister Valois.


I am sure that any one, who will read his reply (to my complaint concerning the incident in Montreal General Hospital's ER), will objectively interpret it, because the meaning of this document is significant, with a barefaced mockery over all verbalizations about the equality of citizens and human rights.


As for me personally - and my answer to Mister Valois - it remained nothing else but to wipe myself - and to swallow this pill, because I understood: it is impossible to go further, that's all, the end of the way; otherwise I will be just crushed - and erased to powder.


And I tried to pretend that I "agree" with the answer of Mister Valois, and focused on less dangerous details of my demands, which satisfaction I hoped to achieve.


However, I was mistaken in my hopes as it will be understandable from the further narration.


After a call from Mister Valois' assistant, who told that for achieving my demands (to obtain information on entries of "not medical character" in my medical files) - I have to address to a special body of access to information, addressing to mister Robert Cox, I composed an application, which sent on June 20, 2015.


The original (pdf-file) was sent by fax and e-mail.


During further description of events, I citing it below.


Now, the medical documents, which were written out during my stay in the mentioned ER department and connected with the incident, are provided (below):


LIST OF DOCUMENTS:


April 24, 2015. The referral on orthopedic physical therapy, which very much helped me and radically improved a situation with the wrist joint.


April 24, 2015. Official report of the triage nurse, Joanna Priestley.

Besides other things that were already analyzed in my evaluation of Joanna Priestley's official report, it is here she stated that "the patient speaks about the enemies of the state", and so forth, and here it is necessary to pay a special attention that THIS (unlike ALL other insinuations!) is not linked IN ANY WAY to psychiatric "diagnoses" or "deviations", which were invented by this nurse-provoker. Thus, IT is also a key to all of other her false and provocative statements, and incontestably proves that her trick was purely a political provocation.


April 24, 2015. The document where the statements of 2 different nurses contradicting each other are compared.


April 24, 2015. The 1st page of doctor's records. My statements (that the severe arthritis attack was provoked by refusal of antibiotics and (later) of anti-inflammatory) are paraphrased in an accusatory and sarcastic manner, and - with lack of medical ethics - through a prism of psychiatric insinuations.


April 24, 2015. 2-nd page doctor's records. Among other unethical insinuations: that the reddening which is, allegedly, connected with arthritis, is supposedly something like a burn; that, allegedly, I refused to repeat the lab tests (it is a lie); and also the insinuation about the "obsessive ideas" connected exclusively with the provocative official report of the engaged nurse-provoker, and with the fact that I blame the refusal of antibiotics (concerning an urological infection), and, later, the refusal of anti-inflammatory for aggravating the arthritis.

On the other hand, a dry (straight) retelling - by the doctor - of what I said, without distortion of the meaning, also presents indirectly, decoding what I really said (and could not say anything else) in the room of the triage nurse, cleaning my statements from wild distortions and false "retelling" of the nurse Joanna Priestley.

However, the same remark of Dr. Sermignani (Sergmina?) can evoke much more ominous sense - if she meant not only the fact that I supposedly did not show willingness to repeat analyses in the emergency department (and this is a lie), but also the fact that I (really) refused to pass the urine test repeatedly on April 10, 2015, in St.-Mary's Hospital's laboratory on the requisition, which was already used for 2-3-2015 urine test (while all 13 pages of the original blood-urine lab tests from March 2 - April 10, 2015, except of 3, were lost).

The matter not only in the distortion (the reason of my refusal was to prevent a medical scum, prepared by the hospital, in term to create a cock-a-hoop; and I still hoped that the original ur. test will be found somewhere in St.-Mary's Hospital) ...

If doctor Sermignani (Sergmina?) put such a false sense, then, in that case, it was a broad plot with participation of not only Montreal General Hospital's administration, but also by the "captains" of St.-Mary's Hospital.

It is obvious that each of participants of these events understood: if I agreed to the "repeated" analysis, the case would be turned so as if there was no ur. test on March 2, 2015, and as if I did not come to this laboratory to pass tests in March 2015 at all (the printout of its result - on March 3), and - instead - they would substitute the previous test by the "repeated" analysis on April 10, 2015 as if it was an only and single "original".

The coordinated lie and mystification of 2 hospitals, in which fabrication participated - the staff of the laboratory, computer personnel, administration, the triage nurse, and the emergency room's doctor (and still not known how many other medics): it is a nightmare at the level of horror films.


April 24, 2015. The summary of doctor's official report; about the appointed treatment.


April 24, 2015. The prescribed medications.


April 24, 2015. A note to the physiotherapist.


April 24, 2015, in emergency department of MGH hospital. Prescriptions List: Voltaren and Diclorenak - anti-inflammatory drugs; Hyderm - cream (for treatment of reddening, similar to dermatitis (wrist treatment); Pantoloc - pills (for protection of gastroenterology tract against undesirable effects of Voltaren and other tablets; even about it (about the protection of stomach and intestines during intake of Voltaren) Dr. M. Cermignani (Cergmina) took care...).

However, I would prefer the "natural" protection against Voltaren, i.e. by means of dietary supplements.

Also prescribed: Hydrocortisone (concerning acute dermatitis on the inflamed joint), the prescription on orthopedic support, and the referral on physical therapy. (Only SOME patients receive such a referral!).


April 24, 2015. The standard table-form for entering tests' and exams data of patient's condition, collected by the triage nurses. Names of both nurses are specified here.


April 24, 2015. Extract from the official report of the doctor (this original is given here for an opportunity to compare its data with my letter to ombudsman).


April 24, 2015. One more extract from the official report of the doctor (this original is given here for an opportunity to compare its data with my letter to ombudsman).


April 24, 2015. The following document displays the name of the doctor (Cermignani), and also a part of medical appointments and a reference to medical treatments appointed by doctor Yiri Krasny...


On May 14, 2015 I - after all - decided to get Pantoloc, but in I received in the pharmacy - without warning! - a substitutive (generic) drug Pantoprazol, instead of Pantoloc (see above).


The medical treatment's course appointed this time in ER helped: pains (in the wrist and other joints) have completely passed for a while; the motive functions were completely restored; inflammation disappeared.

So, why was it impossible to appoint this course of medical treatment in time, at the very beginning of the arthritis attack, to prevent dysfunctions, suffering, and further undesirable consequences?


Thus, despite her (possibly, forcibly imposed on her down her throat) police-style "cross-questioning" (of her patient) and violation of the "red line" of medical ethics, Dr. Sermignani did everything possible to stop patient's suffering; to soften terrible effects and consequences of the triage nurse's provocation; to restore patient's functionality, threatened by arthritis; and to cut the active stage of acute arthritis.


Consequently, we can divide Dr. Sermignani's actions of into 3 separate strata: a) an active participation in the oppressive KGB-style operation of the brutal suppression of dissident's fair denunciations; b) attempts to soften the cruelty of this brutal totalitarian repression, through reshaping the statements of this rat-nurse, who is serving as a stool pigeon; c) her heroic personal actions for restoring the medical justice; compensating the impact of medical crimes on her patient; stopping patient's suffering; restoring patient's health.


The 3-rd layer reflects her true nature of compassionate, courageous, and rightful personality. However, the poisonous-perfidious state propaganda is so sinister that managed to brainwash even such good people as Dr. Sermignani, who, realizing that everything that insinuated the triage nurse was a dirty provocation, still, partially preserved some distrust in me, as if I was a criminal, or a dangerous person. When Dr. Sermignani was examining the X-ray report, she even shared with me that 2 of the most important for this diagnostic procedure radiology pictures (films) were "lost". (Later I learned about it - additionally - from other sourses.)


As for the nurse Joanna Priestley, this inveterate provoker and the squealer for many years is a star of the state propaganda and the protégé of the reactionary-tyrannical forces.


Shortly after my submission of my complaint to MUHC hospitals' ombudsman, I was bombarded by tons of spam with the return address of Facebook, with a question whether I know such and such people.


Among the mentioned persons also Joanna Priestley appeared.


These provocations of espionage Facebook and the regular arrival (to all of my anonymous e-mail addresses) of such spam messages, where my real name is entered and are listed all my relatives, friends, acquaintances and colleagues, are especially shocking, because I was never registered on Facebook and did not even visit the home page of this spying monster ever.


The fact that my correspondence from my official e-mail address with official medical institutions was intercepted and fell into the clutches of Facebook - is an axiom. Otherwise, nobody would connect me in any way with this spiteful nurse, with whom I was crossed on April 24, 2015.


Her profile brought to newspapers, where she was represented as an "indicative" nurse, of whom "we have" "to follow an example". The English-speaking Quebec press so praised her and trumpeted about her that this personality became in great demand on the (federal) Canadian state TV channel CBC, in Montreal's "The Gazette", and other English newspapers. (I did not find any mention of her in French Canadian press that rather eloquently reflects her ominous mission).


This media favorite filled out with herself pages of Montreal's "The Gazette", Toronto's "Globe & Mail", medical monthly McGill journal, and other magazines and newspapers, acted on the state CBC television, and on other television channels, was used in fund raising for needs of medical institutions.


As some indicative communist and careerist in the former USSR, she had to remain a standard with spotless reputation; otherwise, the state promotion will strongly suffer.


For this reason, my complaint "on any way" would not run off, and, for the same reason, Joanna Priestley, but not someone else, could be used for provocation against me.


The oldest of the called publications go back as far in the past as Joanna Priestley's work in Children's English hospital, when it was on Tupper and Dorchester (Rene-Levesque) streets. Exactly during this period, I heard a story about a nurse-sadist, who was fired by then or forced to leave.


After such a waste layer of time, I already find it difficult to remember what was talking about, but here is what seems interestingly.


In one of her interview, Madame Priestley does such recognition: she was forced to leave her work in children's hospital emergency department because... could not see sick children...


It does not match her aggressive and impudent character, the whole nature of her style of communication and behavior, and her type of the virago, and with a total absence in her even a shadow of sympathy and compassion at all.


Probably, not for nothing she had to leave the hospital on Tupper Street.


When our children were small, and my wife and me - we had - 3 or 4 times - bring our small children to this children's hospital's Emergency Room with different cases, once we came across the aggressive triage (reception) nurse, who broke out in abuse, and threatened "to show us the door" by means of the security guards, and even threatened to call the police just because we (my wife and me) approached her - only to ask her how many hours - approximately - still it was necessary to wait. (We sat by then with a sick child already not less than 4 hours!).


We inquired very politely, without raising our voices (even too shy and quiet), without any irritation or reproach.


The nurses - registrars, acceptance inspectors, and secretaries - sat then at a rack, just here, in the waiting room, behind a glass transparent partition with "windows".


So, my wife and me: we did not violate any hand-written or unwritten rules, did not enter "without permission" any "closed" specially allocated triage room, and did not even distract the nurse from other patients or duty activities (at that moment her window had no visitor, and she just sat, having propped up a cheek a hand).


And now I think: whether there could be Joanna Priestley?


One more curious moment: in St.-Mary's Hospital's Emergency Room, at night from 2-nd to 3-rd October, 2007 - after I was hit by car, - the triage nurse deliberately and grotesquely distorted my statement about the road accident, and, moreover, exposed the whole incident as if I "invented" it.


She did not inform police on the incident - as I insisted; did not include the information about the color and the license plate number of the car (which hit me) in the official report (as I demanded); and concealed (not entering in the official report) others important medical and non-medical facts and details reported by me.


The whole style of distortions and behavior of THAT triage nurse reminds the specific features manifested during the provocation arranged in April 2015, by the nurse Joanna Priestley too closely.


My memory on faces is selective and changeable, but THAT (St.-Mary's) nurse is remembered by me as another, not really similar to Madame Priestley.


On the other hand, 8 years ago Joanna Priestley could be much more harmonious and not be allocated with obesity.


Could she work some time in St.-Mary's hospital? Whether there could be she at that night from the 2-nd to 3-rd of October 2007? Whether it was possible that she could be placed by the oppressive organs to St.-Mary's ER at night on 2-3 October 2007, giving herself out for another nurse?


On the other hand, if it - after all - was not her: from where is resulting such a similarity of style, manner, and special impudence?


Not therefore, whether it is visible "with the naked eye" that both nurses received special instructing (and, even, moreover, training) by the same employee of the intelligence agencies or police?


However, there is more to come.


The signature of the triage nurse, whose shift was at night from the 2-nd to 3-rd October 2007, contains an initial (first letter) J., same as the name of Joanna Priestley. The surname is not legible, but even if it does not coincide, Joanna - after 2007 - quite could marry and take a surname of her husband.


That is - a probability that THAT triage nurse and Joanna Priestley - the same person: increases.


Next curious moment.


Joanna Priestley's interviews to the public federal CBC channel, The Gazette, and other media, as well as all mentions of her in Canadian medical and media sources - contain exclusively the headings alone.


The contents of these articles for the last 10 years were removed from all websites, from all sources.


Here, for example, a video about her under the name "Go inside an emergency trauma center; in our videos of the week" on the website Canada News (Canada.com), from April 27, 2015.


It is Here possible to read here only the heading, and the video does not work.


I tried "to start" this video from different browsers, from different computers: without success.


I checked it with a special software, which verdict was: video does not exist.


It means - it was erased.


Or, for example, the reference to article about Joann Priestley in The Gazette from April 22, 2015 on Montreal News Net website (April 25, 2015).


The reference montrealgazette.com/news/local-news/montreal-before-dawn-trauma-in-the-er - does not work...


Or, for example, a material in the same The Gazette - "Montreal Before Dawn: In the ER", the author - Phil Carpenter. (This material was published on April 21, 2015, RENEWED (! - attention!) - April 24, 2015. And here it is only a heading and short (couple of lines) synopsis, but neither material's content, nor video exists.


Or rather, video as though "presents", but it does not work, and, so, it was removed.


Or, for example, a material "Montreal General Hospital nurse Joanna Priestley has seen a lot, but you never see it all". (April 22, 2015 7:46 am).


And here are only heading and photo, and nothing else.


The same is in the monthly journal MUHC, in the news (April 27-May 8 2015).


Here is also only a heading.


In the materials of the Canadian state radio station CBC there is an archival record about a radiobroadcast containing an interview with Joanna Priestley (May 18, 2014). Here this nurse is represented as a "national standard", as the national heroine, which is promoted by the name of material: Canadian National Week of Nurses.


But here is also a familiar picture.


The sound file with the record of this interview - does not work...


So, who and why (for what purpose and because of what motives) coordinated the removal of ALL materials about the nurse Joanna Priestley, eradicating them from the Canadian Internet? And whether accidentally a massive series of publications about her began in 3 days prior to my appearance in ER - and around 4 more days after (it turns out together EXACTLY a WEEK of publications of materials about Joann Priestley)?


Who and why instigated all mass media sources to start a WEEK of publications about the nurse Joanna Priestley, and whether accidentally this "week of Joanna" coincided with the provocation against me in Montreal General Hospital's (MGH) ER - where she works?


The fact that I will have to address to MGH Hospital' ER with the wrist arthritis sooner or later (but rather sooner) - was an axiom, considering a special purpose (specialization) of this hospital and its ER as center for injuries, center of problems of bones and joints, and also considering that right now I am visiting Dr. Yiri Krasny not in old Royal Victoria Hospital, but in MGH.


It leads to the next question: whether it could happen so that OTHER nurse, who came to work in her shift, or - according to schedule - been given assignment to work that morning, was urgently REPLACED by the nurse Joanna Priestley, in connection with my arrival? [As, perhaps, the female bus driver (on my way home) was urgently replaced by another bus driver: because I went by this bus, and a provocation was already prepared or improvised ad libitum? (See below.)]


A single - remained in the form of a short summary - fragment of an interview with Joanna Priestley contained her words that the Emergency Room: it is an intense, stressful to a limit, difficult environment; unforeseen and even unpredictable situations (and - as it is necessary to understand on a hint - impulsive behavior of people); and conflict circumstances - as from a thriller.


"At work in ER, it seems to you that you already saw everything, - broadcasts Joanna Priestley, - and that already NOTHING can surprise you. And so - every time you think that you already saw EVERYTHING. But no, you did not see "everything" yet! You really did not see anything yet!".


She speaks about intoxicated persons get drunk up to insensibility (coming to the hospital); about participants of gang fights that are addressing to ER with their traumas...


And - no word or even a hint about a compassion for human sufferings, about a noble humanitarian mission of medical workers, about the point of professional medical work, at last. Everything that she speaks in the fragments of her interviews (found by me): this could tell about his work a police officer, but not a medic.


Of course, without knowing the full content of her interviews, it is impossible to claim that everything in them rotates purely around the gendarme nature of her work - generally common with the work of police. But her style, accents, orientation of her reasonings just do not leave the place for anything else.


And, therefore, it appears that she works in ER not on the vocation of her heart, i.e. not for humanitarian mission - as the nurse, but to tickle the nerves, for the sake of the mad atmosphere, which is going beyond normal, for the sensation of adventurism.


SOME individuals that go to work to police are driven by just the same motives; they want to see, to test, and to experience something that does not happen in "normal" life, where the chance to shoot someone "on legal grounds" will be never around, where you have no chances to participate in fights, to shout and offend someone (detained, suspected, persons under investigation).


If this is a "model" nurse, then - in today's Canada - they "mixed up": where is a medical institution - and where is police.


And, at last, the final observation.


As soon as I tried to download any page with materials about Joanna Priestley TILL 2014, there was a failure, and these pages never opened again any more.


The same happened with the Jewish news portal, where - near the article about Judaic Hanukahs celebration and short instructions how to respect the Jewish religious traditions, - it was told about a "wonderful" (literally - wonderful) nurse Joanna Priestley.


In my attempt to load these pages (which I browsed from my personal computer and with my own IP address) - mine computer frozen, the screen went out, and, in a repeated attempt to come to same pages, they as though did not exist anymore: as if someone urgently and quickly removed them.


I tried to get an access to same articles and video-audio materials not only from my home Internet access, but also through the access of the free municipal network and from other computers, but, in this case, they did not work anymore anyways.


All this puts 3 fat dots in the end of this story...


As well as in case with Joanna Priestley (a fighter of the ideological front in a white dressing gown), the most spiteful positions among doctors and medical staff (in the course of my long tormenting experience) was occupied by such unethical doctors as O. Sprull, John Patrick Rowen, Brian Morris, Stephen Herskovits, Chirgwin German, Makeda Semret, and other fighters of the ideological [or (and) money-grubbing, or (and) sadistic pleasure] front, and - "in combination" - off-hour job workers in the medical field.


The emergency doctor of St.-Mary's Hospital, Stephen Herskovits, evaluated my injuries when I was hit by car.


Like another state propaganda ideological front fighter, nurse Joanna Priestley, Dr. Gershkovich (Herskovits) was a frequent guest on newspapers' and magazines' pages, was engaged in broad public activities, and kept membership in several (including international) organizations.


He did everything that was depending on him "to disprove" the severity of my serious injuries after road accident on October 2, 2007.


He refused blood vessels (veins) ultrasonography, and could consciously provoke the most catastrophic consequences if one of blood clots should be carried by the bloodstream to the heart, or would cork the vessels feeding the brain, or (if - as a result of veins' trauma) there could develop a situation critical for the lower extremities.


Whether it is possible to believe in such "accidental coincidence"?


Now we will return to events of the same day, April 24, 2015, because this case did not come to an end with the timeframes of the provocation in the emergency room of Montreal General Hospital.


When I reached (on my way home from hospital) the Guy Concordia metro station, there was a bus at the bus stop, which run almost to my house.


I decided to go from here by the land transport.


My initial intention to go home by metro changed sudden feeling sick.


The same wrist that was affected by arthritis, burned and ached, and strong fatigue (since yesterday evening - I did not eat and did not drink anything): this by itself, but suddenly there darkened in my eyes; a dizziness started right away; unpleasant whistle in ears appeared; and legs became like cotton.


I had a sensation like I ceased to feel the right half of my head.


It never happened to me.


A terrible weakness pulled hard, and hands and legs as though were poured by lead.


It, too, never happened earlier to me.


I do not doubt at all that this health state was a consequence of the stress in connection with the weird incident in hospital.


Before entering into the salon of the bus, I glanced at the schedule. Though on time it was time to go long ago, the bus stood as driven. And even when there showed up a female driver, the departure was ALREADY delayed, and she did not hurry to turn on the ignition.


The end to this "delay" was not visible.


Under the oppressive eyes of the spy-cameras, several passengers sat meek and mild. Everyone was afraid to approach and to ask why we do not go. Nobody was eager to be cached with a "discontent" on the video surveillance camera, and, respectively, to the black list.


Perhaps, it is a common practice, but I paid attention to the following circumstances.


When I approached the bus, the front door was open, and the salon was empty: no driver, no passengers.


Then, when I got inside, and (together with me or after me) also 2-3 more passengers, the female driver entered, and some time sat at the steering column. Even when, according to the schedule, we had to go already along the route, she still sat on the driver's place. And - suddenly (a bit later) - a male driver unexpectedly appeared, and an impression was palpable that he - at least - surprised (if did not shock) the female driver, but she resignedly left her working place without questions (since - at Harper era - questions became dangerous to be asked).


On the way home: light dizziness, whistle in ears, heartbeat, pressure in the thorax on the left side amplifying at breath. This all was in consequence of the incident, which occurred in ER.


..........................


CHAPTER 3.


As it becomes clear from the previous narration, the attitude of health workers to my complaints about the acute arthritis attack was: they claimed that I have nothing, and that my physical suffering and wrist's deformation is a product of only my suspiciousness.


To prove their point of view, they went as far as negating even visually obvious joints' inflammations, and, probably, undertook a false reading of X-rays, apparently, ignoring obvious pathologies. Here is the X-ray from April 4, 2015:


The X-ray of left hand's wrist joint after my visit to Dr. Krasny on April 21, 2015: the 3-rd projection.


The conclusion of the radiologist on X-ray of the left hand' wrist joint right after my visit to Dr. Krasny on April 21, 2015.


The following details at once are evident:

1) The expression "No acute (FRESH) fracture nor dislocation" not typical for such official reports. Usually radiologists limit themselves to "no fracture" (but not "no ACUTE fracture"). Such turn of speech causes an impression of some falseness as though the man, who made the report, simply ignored the fact of NOT a fresh fracture (noticed by him).

2) Judging by the form, the conclusion was written by a student, or a recent student.

3) It is unknown, whether it is a normal practice - the fact that the document contains surnames of 3 doctors (apart from the doctor who referred to this exam). At the same time, for some reason there is no mention of the technician-radiologist, who was directly carrying out the procedure of X-ray. I may be wrong in my conclusions, but it seems that this document has, at least, one serious contradiction: in the upper table-form, it is indicated "dictated by Powell Thomas" but in the next to last line there is another indication, "Exam dictated by Dr. C. Yan, Resident".

4) Besides, if it is particularly underlined that Dr. Yan is a resident, then, by logic, Dr. Thomas Powell is not a resident. Moreover, his name was printed in 2 different versions: as "Tom" and "Thomas". It is not in the format of a norm for official documents.

5) The fact that this X-ray was done on April 21, 2015, but its preliminary report was composed almost 3 days later (April 23, 2015) is unusual for MGH radiology in this period of time (according to my data - it is very likely, so), and the final report is dated "8-th of May, 2015". Except my own x-ray reports, I saw my mother's, my wife's and daughters', friends', etc., but such "postponed" (for 18 days!) X-ray report did not meet the conclusions. Therefore, there is a natural suspicion that the initial result of X-ray done, as usually by then, within 6-24 hours, or in 1 day after the procedure, then was rewritten on April 23, 2015, and then - once again - rewritten on May 8, 2015. Perhaps, the task of copying (falsifying) of the initial result was undertaken only 1 time - on May 8, 2015.


The requisition on blood test, which was written out by Dr. Krasny on April 21, 2015. For the inexplicable reasons, Dr. Krasny did not include (in this requisite) the urine test on hyperuricemia, and did not include other components that could shed light on what triggers the arthritis: to produce, at last, a diagnosis.


See below a series of photos, which show not only the pathological redness, caused by the arthritis, but also an obvious deformation, disputed by unethical doctors. On April 24, 2015, the picture was much more terrible. The following documents (photos and X-Ray films) show that, despite my complaints, and obvious facts and evidence, doctors negated an obvious arthritis, sabotaging its treatment, diagnostics, and prevention of its acute form. Not only the redness, but also the pathological deformation can be seen by a naked eye. The fact logic and visual evidence demonstrate that the medics were fully aware about an intolerable pain that I am experiencing, but conscientiously exposed me to the tortures.


(see below)


These photos reflect the situation on (approximately) 30 of April, 2015, when some improvement (due to, finally!, prescribed (in ER) medications) were already coming and accelerating.


The same policy, tactics, and methods were used by the same forces within the Canadian political regime since my first exposure to them, when, in 1999-2000, they used the falsification of medical data as a tool in politically-motivated persecutions against my mother, and me. By then, Canadian Federal Ministry of Immigration used falsified medical data (like misinterpreted echocardiogram and forged diagnosis "tuberculosis") for toppling our immigration procedure. In the following years, the falsification of medical data, naturally, accompanied the sabotage and open denial of the most essential medical help. This, in turn, was accompanied by pure gendarme-style governmental oppression, like police intimidation and surveillance, illegal psychological and psychiatric evaluations, and bizarre provocations, like the incident on April, 24, 2015.


The events around the fake diagnosis "tuberculosis" (2000); the conflict in St.-Mary Hospital's ER in October, 2007, when the triage nurse, Dr. Stephen Herskovits, and other medics, took part in the conspiracy operation, which goal was 1) to dispute the very fact of the road accident, 2) to sabotage police investigation of the circumstances, when I was hit by car, and 3) to negate, first, the very fact of my injuries, and, then, the nature and severity of my injuries; and the weird provocation in MGH's ER (April, 24, 2015): are the links of the same chain.


Since 2013, this barbaric health-care tendency, directed against certain individuals, was expanded to cover entire social classes and wide groups of citizens, denied medical help completely or partially. Like the administrators of other neo-totalitarian regimes - similar to Canadian, or softer, or harsher then the Canadian - the British vicars in Canada started to use the medical domain as one of their most important oppressive tools. They oriented the whole health-care system on cynical social segregation, slavery generation, and violent policy of injustice and terror...


A new X-ray was done on July 3, 2015, in VM-Med radiology. By then, things started to calm down, and this X-ray was "allowed" to be DIFFERENT from the previous X-ray at Montreal General Hospital, which totally denied any abnormality. Here, in the conclusive report of the X-ray from July 3, 2015, some of the abnormalities are already "recognized", still, not actually called "abnormalities" (see below):


The wrist X-ray report from July 3, 2015, interpreted on the same day (see above).

"There is very minimal distal interphalangeal joint space narrowing" - was written, being a "progress" of recognition of the arthritis itself and my suffering. The expression "very minimal" was, clearly, used for denying the fact of abnormalities, and gave away the partiality of the X-ray reading. If the requisition was not administrated by a rheumatologist of Armenian origin, even such a small compromise would be never allowed.

By "distal interphalangeal joint space narrowing", the radiologist mean the interdigital space between big and index fingers of the left wrist. It was, still, very far from the recognition of the true (most important) problem.


In 2015, another rheumatologist administrated an ultrasound of the same joint, and - at first - I made an attempt to book a rendezvous in St.-Mary's Hospital, but soon the record of my queue turn, my name on the waiting list, and a copy of the requisition (submitted by fax) "were lost" there, and I addressed to a hospital, which radiology - on some information - was not under the influence of that group of "hawks", who stood behind those prosecutions to which I was exposed. Whether it is surprising that exactly this ultrasonography undergone "improbable adventures"?


Here is the text of my fax concerning "the first phase" of these adventures (see below):


Here is told that, in August, 2015, I contacted St.-Mary's Hospital, and they promised me to call back, but never called back.


In October, 2015, I called the information desk of another hospital, and was given s fax number for passing of the ultrasonography procedure - 514-934-8322.


I submitted the requisition by fax, and got a confirmation that "on the other end of the wires" that fax was received.


However, nobody called me back again.


And, finally, having got one more fax number, I sent the requisition to fax number 514-843-1301, and also called by phone to number 514-934-4434.


It would seem that, finally, a date of the ultrasonography has to be appointed, but... far from it...


So, at first, the copies of this requisition - sent by fax - vanished in the second hospital as well (for saving of space, I omit the material proof: the confirmation of fax's reception by hospital; sound files of negotiations with radiology's registry for the procedure of ultrasonic exam, etc.).


And yet - with great difficulties, - but I succeeded to register my name on the waiting list for this ultrasonography, and soon received the date of passing of this procedure (for the end of 2015).


However, after some time, I was called, and was told that this procedure is postponed to the beginning of 2016.


But this date was not final as well.


Soon, I was called, and designated other date, and, through some time, called back about reassignment of ultrasound's date again - already for a new date, when a meeting with my family doctor had to take place: on April 8, 2016, at 11:00. (If someone wanted to sabotage the ultrasound procedure again, it was very easy to do, because, since the establishment of the centralized governmental medical data for all citizens, any enforcement agency clerk, or any medical worker in Quebec could access my file - and to find out about the appointment with my family doctor in the morning, on April 8, 2016).


When I spoke by telephone with the radiology worker (who was calling to me), I said that another, very important, medical rendezvous is already appointed to the same day, being assigned for 9:45. However, he succeeded in convincing me that I can go to both rendezvous, arriving for ultrasound in advance, and can ask for an urgent reception in connection with this blunder (and perhaps, to be in time (for the second appointment) or late "for a couple of minutes").


However, I immediately counted that I will not be able to appear in time in any way, and - next day - called back, and told that I cannot come to ultrasonography, on April 8, 2016, because - for the same morning - is appointed another medical rendezvous. They promised to call back in the next few days, but nobody called back.


Then I called the office of radiology of Royal Victoria hospital again, and reminded that I will not be able to come on April 8, 2016, for ultrasound. However, the male medic - with whom I spoke, - told me that "so far" still "nobody cancelled this ultrasonography", and advised me "to try to be in time" on ultrasonography "after the doctor", and, if I am - after all - not in time: it's OK (not a catastrophe), since he will place a special mark that the patient warned that he may not be in time for ultrasonography. And, if I will not be able to show up altogether, then the date of the appointment for ultrasound will be reassigned.


On April 11, 2016, I sent a new fax to Royal Victoria hospital - concerning the wrist ultrasonography - informing that - after all - was not in time for ultrasound after the doctor (on April 8, 2016) - and I asked to appoint a new date as soon as possible.


CHAPTER 4.


On the same Monday, April 11, 2016, I managed to reach by phone the office of ultrasound of Royal Victoria Hospital, and was promised that someone will call me back "as soon as possible" to appoint a new date for this rendezvous.


However, nobody called back again, and, meanwhile, a wave of an extreme health drama covered me with the head, and could not care less about the ultrasonography.


Only at the beginning of 2018, I was unexpectedly called from the same radiology, and asked whether I will come to an ultrasonography procedure!


Calling me back "as soon as possible" took them entire 2 years!


Possibly, this procedure somehow slipped out from under control of the "higher bodies", because I not only could pass the wrist's ultrasound, but also received an official confirmation of the pathology existence in this joint (as one would expect):


The "extensor carpi ulnaris tendon with background of tendinosis and tenosy novitis" is already a diagnosis, refused by a bunch of unethical doctors, but - for a wider abnormalities recognition - a CT-scan or MRI would bring a better result.


This procedure and this ultrasound report took place when, as a result of numerous methods of treatment, including physical therapy and special ointments, anti-inflammatory local and general purpose, etc. - there came a radical improvement, and even joint deformation was partially turned back (you trust it or not).


Therefore, it is possible to assume that - if I underwent an objective (not falsified) X-ray and ultrasonography procedures in the middle of the acute arthritis attack in April, 2015; and, if 2 of the most precisely reflecting the problem radiography pictures (films) would not be "missing" (see above); and, if the radiologists would not ignore the pathological changes seen in the pictures: then a more serious arthritic damage would be recorded.


Thus, it is possible to conclude that, as well as in any other case, this time (as well) I saw doctors not because of mine (as some medics claimed) "hypochondria", but because I suffered from real and rather serious misfortune.


The documents provided here prove my case, and demonstrate much more serious violations of laws and regulations, than only a violation of medical ethics.


And, at last, it is possible to conclude that I got off with almost minimum damage to the wrist joint and other bones, joints, cartilages, and tendons - only because of the treatment achievements, without which I, for certain, would be left with some kind of disabilities, restricting my functionality, and may not be able to play piano any more, or to do a set of other things.


Now, we'll return to the events, related to the incident of April, 24, 2015.


See below: other confirmations of my complaints' arrival to relevant authorities, and also some of the answers received from them:


- 2 -


See below: the copy of one of automatic reply - the confirmation of receiving of my complaint directed to the office of Mister Pascal Valois (generated by robot in response to my e-mail from June 10, 2015):


Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 12:05:54 -0400 [11/06/15 12:05:54 PM EDT]

From: Ombudsman@MUHC.MCGILL.CA

To: leog@total.net

Subject: Re: MGH Ombudsman

Part(s): 2

to_MGH_Ombudsman.pdf 8 MB

Download All Attachments (in .zip file)

1 unnamed 2 KB


This is an automatic response confirming receipt of your e-mail. You will be contacted by the Complaints Commissioner to discuss this matter. Thank you for your message.


* * * * * *


Ceci est une réponse automatique confirmant que votre courriel a été reçu. Vous serez contacté par le commissaire aux plaintes pour en discuter. Merci pour votre message.


In response to:


leog@total.net 10/

10/06/2015 08:33 To

PM ombudsman@muhc.mcgill.ca

cc

Subject MGH Ombudsman


In response to: leog@total.net


To: MGH Ombudsman

From: Lev GUNIN

ombudsman@much.mcgill.ca

MUHC Office of the Ombudsman

1650 Cedar Room E6.164 Montreal, Qc

H3G 1A4

Pascale Valois, tel. 514-934-1934 ext 44285.


For security reasons, the message is sent as an attachment in a pdf-format.

(See attached file: to_MGH_Ombudsman.pdf)


..............


Only at the end of July, 2015, arrived a confirmation from McGill University medical institutions' ombudsman of my complaint's (sent by the fax and e-mail on June 10, 2015) reception.


In spite of the fact that this confirmation arrived nearly a month later, it was dated the 16-th of June. (My complaint was sent on June 10 (2015).


At the same time, electronic confirmations in obtaining my complaint online arrived on June 11 and 12, 2015.


These confirmations were for certain generated automatically, by the robot, without participation of the personnel.


And, as my letters did not pass, and my mailbox (and then the Internet itself) was disconnected by my Internet service provider literally in minutes after the 1-st attempt to send the complaint from my e-mail account, I repeated attempts reach the ombudsman from other computers and through an alternative Internet-access.


For this reason, not only one, but multiple messages of robot-generated confirmations arrived.


This only already shows, how seriously was evaluated my complaint (as a certain serious threat to someone), so serious that - apparently - they even did not decide at once yet, whether to confirm the arrival of my complaint message by an official letter.


Then, it seems, they realized that - anyways - I have a proof in the form of the confirmations sent by the online robot (and in the form of the digital confirmations of the fax-machine), and decided to answer after all.


Approximately on July 18, 2015, there arrived a confirmation from McGill University medical institutions' ombudsman that my complaint (sent on June 10, 2015) was received:


My reply to this letter (see above) of Monsieur Valois was composed and sent later - on August 27, 2015, - approximately one month after receiving this reply from the ombudsman of McGill University medical institutions, Mister Valois.


See below: the copies of e-mails, their details and also the main turning points of all correspondence:


Among them, see below the copy of the text of my reply to Monsieur Valois - given below according to chronology.


An additional message (in response to the official letter of ombudsman) was addressed to Monsieur Valois for Robert Cox on August 29, 2015.


The initial letter of June, 2015, contained the inquiry about the incident in MGH's ER - with the demand to provide information on "non-medical" data in my file in the system of McGill University medical institutions (hospitals and policlinics), mentioning of mine:

a) political, ideological, or other type of views and beliefs;

b) mentions of my property and social status;

c) my, allegedly, psychological, neurologic, or psychiatric "disorders";

d) about mine, allegedly, "conflicts" with doctors and medical institutions;

e) about my ethnic origin and about contents of my immigration file;

g) about information on me in the Internet.


Here is the full text (English original):


To: Access Information MUHC

Mr. Robert Cox

2155 Guy Str., Suite 750 Montreal,

Quebec H3H 2R9

From: Lev GUNIN (...)


Dear Sir!


I need your help to find out:


A. 1) If there are any references to my political, ideological, or any other type of views and preferences in my file at McGill University (or affiliated with McGill) medical institutions.

2) If there are any references to my social and financial status.

3) If there are any references to my alleged psychological, psychiatric, or neurologic "disorders".

4) If there are any references to my alleged "conflicts" with medical doctors or institutions.

5) If there are any references to my ethnic origin and my Immigration file.

6) If there are any indications of information about me in Internet.


B. If - while accessing my file - any MD would see something special, like "social anxiety or delusion", "neurologic disorder", etc.


C. I"ll appreciate a copy of all such references. What must be done to initiate a procedure of exclusion of such references or indications from my file, or marking them as untrue? How to eliminate all void (not necessary) non-medical data from my file?


My best regards, Lev (Leon) Gunin.


On this letter the following answer was received:


Date:

Thu, 30 Jul 2015 16:04:21 -0400 [30/07/15 04:04:21 PM EDT]

From: robert.cox@muhc.mcgill.ca

To: leog@total.net

Subject: Robert Cox is out of the office


I will be out of the office starting 06/25/2015 and will not return until 09/08/2015.


Merci pour votre courriel, je suis pas ? mon bureau pr?sentement.

Pour toute urgence, veuillez contacter Maitre Harris Poulis ? l'adresse ? lectronique suivante:


harris.poulis@muhc.mcgill.ca

ou par telephone 514-934-1934 ext.: 71559.


Thank you for your email, I am presently away from my office.

For any urgent matters, kindly direct your request to Maitre Harris Poulis at the following email address:


harris.poulis@muhc.mcgill.ca

or by telephone 514-934-1934 ext.: 71559


Nous sommes là pour vous - www.cusm.ca We're here for you - www.muhc.ca Le message que vous avez reçu, ainsi que toute pièce jointe, a été envoyé a l"intention exclusive de son ou de ses destinataires ; il est de nature confidentielle et peut constituer une information privilégiée. Si vous n"étés pas le destinataire prévu, soyez avisé que toute autre utilisation non autorisé, dénonciation, copie, distribution ou la prise d"une action sur la foi du contenu de ce message et de toute pièce jointe est strictement interdite. Si vous n"étés pas le destinataire prévu, veuillez en aviser immédiatement l"expéditeur par retour de courriel et supprimer le message et toute pièce jointe de votre système.


This communication and any attachment are directed in confidence solely to the person(s) listed above; the materials in this communication are private and may constitute privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that any unauthorized use, disclosure, copying, distribution or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information and any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by return e-mail and delete this communication and any attachment immediately from your system.


- 3 -


On June 18, 2015, I received a phone call from Mister Gauthier's assistant (Madam Nadia Rea). The address of Mr. Cox's office was dictated to me (the Office of Access to Information and Protection of Personal Data).


Madam Nadia Rea explained that - since there are points concerning an access to my personal file in McGill institutions, - as well as my demands to exclude non-medical information from my file, this part requires a separate statement from me addressed to Mister Robert Cox.


But, if even the one, who is put on guards of norms and laws, distorts the truth to the complete antithesis, and tells on "black" - "white": who can be trusted then in general?


Running forward, it is necessary to notice that and I poison with one of the main reasons which provoked persecution by police in medical institutions, there could be my active pozation in protection of historical architecture of Quebec.


At once after Harper's regime capture of power, the demolition of Montreal historic districts - and, especially all objects connected to European architectural tradition and Christian religion - have intensified drastically.


Under Harper - supporter and even participant of B'nei B'rith, - the European cultural heritage, and, especially, the churches - underwent systematic destruction at the level of cultural genocide on ideologically and politically motivated doctrine. Hundreds of churches in Montreal alone, apart from the demolitions in other Quebec cities: were destroyed.


Unique lifestyle of Quebecers, all their environment was bent to please the anti-European, anti-church and anti-Christian ideologists.


All other activists and critics explained this criminal policy by corruption, involvement of politicians, businessmen money-making obsession, greed and shark rapacity of the construction mafia, and by other reasons.


And only I alone - in my oral and written statements - read the assumption of the leading role of banks in architectural heritage destruction, pointing to the hypothesis of a sinister bankers' program, which stands behind the eradication of the heritage of European culture in North America, first of all, aiming to destroy the remarkable historical architecture (till 1990-s) - which substantially remained in Montreal, the city that was enormously big by the standards of 18-19 centuries.


Behind any construction project, there is a bank loan.


Whether so banks are that incentive - that motor propeller, which puts the whole policy of this cultural genocide in Quebec in action?


I tried to collect the evidence that banks not only indirectly, but also directly encourage the demolition of historic European architecture, and even develop and carry out construction projects on the place of the destroyed historical buildings.


And, if it is very difficult to obtain a loan on some construction projects, for others projects (related to historic architecture demolitions) - it is as easy as shelling pears: so, this alone is an additional stimulation of anti-European and anti-Christian demolitions.


I happened to hear statements - from very serious sources at very high level, - that the demolition of churches is best of all financed.


But banks are directly connected with the "pseudo-nation's" theocracy capital and with the interests of its bank top men. (Some light to additional insight of this question shed the work of Karl Marx "Bruno Ваuer. "Die Jugenfrage". Braunschweig, 1843").


Everyone knows that - already counting 2 thousand years - this, the most anti-Christian theology tradition, is shaped as the most anti-Christian ideology, and, if to continue connecting all these dots, we inevitably connect the interests of the money-bags - with the interests of this crypto-theology school.


Then it is easy to connect lines of these monolithic interests to this "pseudo-nation's" lobby in Canada - and pro-favoritism orientation of the Harper regime. Under Harper, their ultra-nationalistic organizations received the status of the highest preference, and actually merged with public authorities. Stephen Harper became actually a member of their extremist, ultra-nationalistic Masonic lodge, participated in its meetings, and nearly entered this group into the Canadian parliament as its most influential lobby.


Harper put his people at the head of a number of Quebec civil engineering firms, and, the most important - at the head of the largest design construction company SNC-Lavalin. Gwyn Morgan - Harper's person on the highest post in this company - had an opportunity not only to control its activity, but also to affect its orientation of activity of all other Montreal civil engineering firms, anyway related to SNC-Lavalin.


And, certainly, not accidentally under Harper the fraudulent "swindle of the century" was committed: the construction of 2 "super-hospitals" (based on McGill University and on Université de Montréal medical institutions), which caused an irreparable damage to cultural and historical French and English Montreal heritage.


Not accidentally, such leaders of Quebec patriots as Jacques Parizeau, Lucien Bouchard, and Pauline Marois, were categorically against the construction in the central part of Montreal of those two "super-hospitals": McGill University's and Montreal University's.


Both of these projects are connected by financial sources and investors, lobbyists and groups of interested parties.


Long before newspapers started to shed light on the leak about Arthur Porter's and Lavalin's swindle, I labeled this project as "criminal".


Should we doubt that someone could be irritated by my talk on this subject, and that this irritation climbs from all cracks when we touch the details of what happened on April 24, 2015, in MG Hospital's ER?


For more details about this "super-hospital's" busyness fraud, about the fact that Dr. Porter mentioned me twice, and about other lines, which can be connected with me: see in the following books and chapters.


____________


Lev Gunin


THE PUNITIVE HEALTH CARE

[HEALTH CARE AS A REPRESSIVE TOOL]


BOOK 5-8


THE UROLOGICAL DRAMA. PART 8. [April-May (-Oct.) 2015]


CONTENT


Chapter 1.

Chapter 2.

Chapter 3.

Chapter 4.

Chapter 5.

Chapter 6.

Chapter 7.

__________


* * *


The whole text of the chronological events and medical documents (under the name of "The Punitive Health Care - (Health Care as a Repressive Tool)" is available for examination only on the basis of the following contract between the author and the reader:


I (THE READER) GIVE MY CONSENT THAT, BY CLICKING CORRESPONDING LINKS AND ACCESSING THE TEXT OF "THE PUNITIVE HEALTH CARE", I AUTOMATICALLY AGREE TO THE FOLLOWING PRELIMINARY CONDITIONS [FOR READING]:


-- I am (at least) 18 years old.


1. I (the reader) is undertaking (commit myself) not to distribute the text of "The Punitive Health Care - (Health Care as a Repressive Tool)" - entirely, or in fragments; not to copy medical documents; and not to share the text and images without author' permission.


2. I (the reader) understand that the confidential information, which is contained in this text, cannot be used for any other [than the reading (extraneous; secondary)] purposes and needs, for any researches, essays, stories, etc.


3. I (the reader) commit myself not to sneer at open ticklish personal information (which sharing was induced by circumstances), not to savor any medical, physiological, or anatomic details, and not to use this text as a reason for mockery and persecution.


4. I (the reader) am warned by the author that, except for a number of obviously immoral (by definition) doctors' and medical staff's actions, other decisions and acts described in this "confession" are not subjected to hasty moral assessment because a) only experts can judge finally about their justification and fairness; b) explanations and vindications of other party are necessary. We also do not know to what degree the doctors were under an influence and direct power of police, Ministry of Immigration, and other enforcement agencies, political organizations, groups and persons - with their own ideological, economic, and propaganda interests, - and to what degree this influence impacted on their diagnostic conclusions and assessments of patient's state of health. Many of the documentary confirmed facts incontestably demonstrate that author's ideological stand (who's opposing to younger generation's transformation into zombie-biorobots with mobile phones on shoulders instead of heads; to electronic totalitarianism with its prison-like total video surveillance; and to the tyrannical political censorship) played nearly a major role in enraging the authorities and triggering the persecutions.


5. I (the reader) am warned that the author sees the main cause of the most dramatic (for him) events in the fact that the enforcement agencies and interested persons and groups managed to present him to the medical community as an individual incapable to evaluate his health condition objectively; as a health-consciousan (or hypochondriac); an extremist; a troublemaker; an individual obsessed with panic and alarm patterns; as a person, who is making unreal demands to the system of medical care - concerning his - allegedly - pseudo-maladies and exaggerated gravity of trivial indispositions. This smear campaign of defamation, scurrilous libel, and wicked calumny made impossible receiving an adequate medical care (and sometimes any medical help at all), and led to health undermining, numerous diseases, incidents, and unnecessary sufferings. Doctors also considered difficult to believe in continuous (not connected with each other) illnesses, with an interval of 4-7 days, sometimes rolling at the same time: as tsunami. They refused to believe in these sequences of illnesses' painful course, danger, and significance. This chronicle disproves such a prejudiced opinion, producing an incontestable evidence.


6. I (the reader) am informed that all negative remarks, characteristics, and facts' assessments belong only to the portrayal of criminal groups, extremists, and carriers of anti-humanistic, racist, and totalitarian ideology, but do not contain groundless generalizations and negative assessment of any country, ethnic group, or religion. The author is categorically against dismantling of any of the existing states, and against restrictions of the rights of religious congregations of any faith.


7. I (the reader) am informed that this edition partially presents the previous 2017 edition without any changes, and, thus, may not correspond to later view and opinions.


8. I (the English reader) am informed that some parts of the following English text of "The Punitive Health Care" - were translated from Polish, Russian, or French originals, and may contain primitive language, double interpretation, or puzzled meaning. Such confusing fragments should be compared with their originals in Polish and Russian languages (author's native languages) [2016-2017]; all controversial points must be resolved through such a comparison.


9. In the very last moment of this edition's make-up (April 2023), the author came across a description of so-called Havana-syndrome, and found same symptoms and complications, which he experienced when was attacked by an unknown remote weapon (3 Nov. 2005, 7 Jan. 2013, and 21 June 2016), and developed symptoms of post-microwave irradiation.


_________


CHAPTER 1.


2015.


APRIL 24, 2015.


THE SECOND FRAGMENT


- 4 -

________

________


After division of mine complaints by M-e Pascal Valois on 2 separate "parts", and after a call from M-e Charles Gauthier's assistant (see above (in the previous volume of the "Urological Drama", Number 7), who dictated the address - for appeal to Robert Cox's bureau, I sent my inquiry to the last (on June 20, 2015).


The further correspondence is reflected in the following documents (see the original texts below):


To: Centre universitaire De santé McGill

Access Information MUHC

Montréal, Québec H3K 1C7

Mr. Robert Cox

Montréal, Québec H3H 2R9 tel. / fax [.....]

Phone: 514 934-8561

Fax: 514 934-8567

2155 rue Guy, Suite 750

robert.cox@muhc.mcgill.ca


From: Lev GUNIN

RAMQ number: [.......]

Hospital card number: ....... (address.......)


Dear Sir!

I need your help to find out:


A.

1) If there are any references to my political, ideological, or any other type of views and beliefs in my file at McGill University"s (or affiliated with McGill) medical institutions.

2) If there are any references to my social and financial status.

3) If there are any references to my alleged psychological, psychiatric, or neurologic "disorders".

4) If there are any references to my alleged "conflicts" with medical doctors or institutions.

5) If there are any references to my ethnic origin and my Immigration file.

6) If there are any indications of information about me in Internet.

B.

If - while accessing my file - any MD would see something special, like "social anxiety or delusion", "neurologic disorder", etc.

C.

I"ll appreciate a copy of all such references.


What must be done to initiate a procedure of exclusion of such references or indications from my file, or marking them as untrue?

How to eliminate all void (not necessary) non-medical data from my file?

My best regards,

Lev (Leon) Gunin.


Thu, 11 Jun 2015 12:05:54 - 0400 [11/06/15 12:05:54 EDT]


From: Ombudsman@MUHC.MCGILL.CA

To: leog@total.net

Subject:

with

t

:

Re: MGH Ombudsman

Part(s):

2 to_MGH_Ombudsman.pdf

8 MB

Download All Attachments (in .zip file)

1 unnamed 2 KB


This is an automatic response confirming receipt of your e-mail. You will

be contacted by the Complaints Commissioner to discuss this matter.

Thank you for your message.

* * * * * *

Ceci est une réponse automatique confirmant que votre courriel a été

reçu. Vous serez contacté par le commissaire aux plaintes pour en

discuter. Merci pour votre message.


In response to:

leog@total.net

10/06/2015 08:33 To

PM ombudsman@muhc.mcgill.ca

cc

Subject: MGH Ombudsman ||

To:

From:

MGH Ombudsman

Lev GUNIN

ombudsman@much.mcgill.ca

MUHC Office of the Ombudsman

1650 Cedar Room E6.164

Montreal, Qc H3G 1A4

Pascale Valois,

tel. 514-934-1934 ext 44285.


For security reasons, message is sent as an attachment in a pdf-format.


(See attached file: to_MGH_Ombudsman.pdf)


The initial letter from June 2015 contained my inquiry with the demands to provide information on whether any "non-medical" information is mentioned in mine the file in the system of McGill medical institutions (hospitals and policlinics):


a) political, ideological, or other type views and beliefs;

b) mentions of mine property and social status;

c) my, allegedly, psychological, neurologic, or psychiatric "disorders";

d) about mine, allegedly, "conflicts" with doctors and medical institutions;

e) about my ethnic origin and about contents my immigration file;

g) about information which is contained about me on the Internet.


Here its full text (English original):


To: Centre universitaire de santé McGill

Access Information MUHC Montréal,

Québec H3K 1C7

Mr. Robert Cox

2155 rue Guy, Suite 750

Phone: 514 934-8561

Fax: 514 934-8567

robert.cox@muhc.mcgill.ca


From: Lev GUNIN (address, hospital and medical card number,

phone, fax, address, e-mail)


Dear Sir!

I need your help to find out:

A. 1) If there are any references to my

political, ideological, or any other type of

views and beliefs in my file at McGill

University"s (or affiliated with McGill)

medical institutions.

2) If there are any references to my

social and financial status.

3) If there are any references to my

alleged psychological, psychiatric, or

neurologic "disorders".

4) If there are any references to my

alleged "conflicts" with medical doctors or

institutions.

5) If there are any references to my

ethnic origin and my Immigration file.

6) If there are any indications of

information about me in Internet.

B. If - while accessing my file - any MD

would see something special, like "social

anxiety or delusion", "neurologic disorder",

etc.

C. I"ll appreciate a copy of all such

references.

What must be done to initiate a procedure of

exclusion of such references or indications

from my file, or marking them as untrue?

How to eliminate all void (not necessary)

non-medical data from my file?

My best regards,

Lev (Leon) Gunin.

___________________________

So:


On July 15, 2015, the office of Access Information MUHC (where I addressed sending my letter to Mr. Robert Cox) reacted to my inquiry with the letter from M-e Charles Gauthier (responsible for access to information), in which selective footnotes were given on Quebec laws on access to information.


At the same time, M-e Gauthier did not specify in any way that mine address disperses from the procedural norms...


On July 30, 2015 (Thursday), the 1-st (and the last) letter arrived from M-r Robert Cox (see below, under the main Paragraph 6 - where the visual copy of the original is given), responsible for access to information in McGill-affiliated medical institutions. Dr. Cox only informed that he is out of his office for sometime. This letter was written from the 1-st person, so, it is not excluded, that it was sent by Mr. Cox personally.


Logically, it is natural to assume that Mr. Cox had to send another, essential message, with the concrete answer, when he will return to office. But any other letter did not follow this short note.


- 5 -

In a month after sending my inquiry to Mister Robert Cox (the chief representative, responsible for access to information and protection of personal data), I received a letter from Madam Nadia Rea (who contacted me at the beginning of June), with an attached file containing the message from Mister Charles Gauthier (whether Robert Cox's deputy, whether he held Mr. Cox's post after last later June events).


The originals of both M-me Rea's letter, and the attached file - are given below.


The first document - is a screen capture (screenshot), a form in the course of mine reply to Madam Rea letter:


(see below)


1. A form where I entered my answer to the letter from Montreal General Hospital, from July 15, 2015 (from the public controller, the assistant of Mr. Charles Gauthier, M-me Nadia Rea). [Nadia Rea, B.A. Technicienne en administration pour Me Charles Gauthier, Responsable désigne de l'accès aux documents et a la protection des renseignements personnels].

She submitted a message from her chef, Mr. Charles Gauthier - the attached file: see below. I immediately responded to this letter: see below the form - where I entered my reply (the following document).

In addition (slightly lower), - script copy of the same document (forms).


Further (again below - lower) is given the copy of the TEXT of the letter from M-me Nadia Rea, the technical assistant and the administrator at M-e Charles Gauthier.


[The text is given in the same - original - UTF-8 encoding, so, in the case of HTML-Java-CSS-pages nature of coding French fragments of the text will be obviously represented incorrectly. To see the graphic conversion of the French letters correctly - it is necessary to rearrange the display of the page on UTF-8. Whereas THIS text I intentionally left in the version of the original script, other French fragments, I translated correctly within the general coding formats.]


The message from M-e Gauthier was submitted in this letter as an attached file, but, judging by the context of events, and also by the fact that the second addressee of this message was Mr. Gauthier himself, it is possible to conclude that "his" letter was composed not by him personally, but by the same M-me Rea, whose e-mail is specified:


(see below)


The 1-st response to my inquiry complaint, sent on July 15, 2015.


[Demande d"accès a l"information - Centre universitaire de sante McGill (CUSM)].


See below the above-mentioned letter in Canadian French, from the name of Mister Charles Gauthier, at first - in the form of scanned images:


(see below: [Demande d"accès à l"information - Centre universitaire de santé McGill (CUSM)])


The 1-st page of Mr. Gauthier's reply to mine complaint inquiry; sent on July 15, 2015 (but received by me in August 2015).

[Demande d"accès à l"information - Centre universitaire de santé McGill (CUSM)]


P. 1:

(my translation from Canadian French)

"Mister Gunin!

The present document confirms that CUSM received your inquiry with the following demands" (further follows Mr. Gauthier's citation of a fragment of my letter);

"In compliance with the paragraph 47 of the Law on Access to Information (la Loi sur l'accès aux documents des organismes publics et sur la protection des renseignements personnels (L.R.Q., with A-2.1), CUSM will respond to your request during 20 week-days, if only:

* It will not arrive a message about additional 10 days, requested by CUSM for foreseen longer studying inquiry (...)" (see the 2-nd page below)


The 1-st reply to mine complaint-inquiry (sent on July 15, 2015).


P. 2

(my translation from Canadian French)


"a warning that is given for the known reasons, that the provided term is not foreseen possible without a harm to the normal process of proceeding;

the opinion of the interested third party is expressed, owing to the paragraph 49 of this Law;

the inquiry is insufficiently exact that does not allow to carry out work with it, and, in such case, CUSM will help you in order that to identify documents which may contain requested data".


"Take also into consideration that behind impossibility to give a chance to go ahead to the inquiry on access to information within the applicable terms, the responsible person has the right to reject access to the requested documents.

As for the written request, in that case, it is possible to address for audits, provided by Section III of Chapter IV as though there was a speech about refusal in access.

Yours faithfully, Charles Gauthier".


The 1-st reply to mine inquiry-complaint, sent on July 15, 2015.

P. 3: The review of articles of the laws concerning the audit and its executive proceduralities.

Full text: (the digitized text - not the image / see a trace. p./)

*** ---- to copy from PDF after editing the text ----

...............................


Centre universitaire de santé McGill

McGill University Health Centre


Charles Gauthier


Responsable accès à

l'information (par intérim)


Responsable - Access to

Information (Intérim)


Montréal, le 15 juillet 2015.


Transmission par courriel :

leog@total.net


Lev (Léon) Gunin (address) (postal code)


Sujet: Demande d'accès â l'information -

Centre universitaire de santé McGill (CUSM)


Numéro de dossier : (dossier number)


2155 Guy, Montréal (Québec) Canada H3H 2R9

633- 2155 rue Guy


Montréal QC CANADA H3H 2R9

Tel 514 934-1934, 71864

Fax 514 934-S567


charles.gaurthier@ijmuhc.incgill.ca

cusin.ca inuhc.ca)


Monsieur Gunin,

La présente confirme que le CUSM a reçu votre demande d'accès à l'information concernant votre demande suivante :


" If there are any references in my file at McGill University's (or affiliated with McGill) medical institutions to my:

A.

1) political, ideological, or any other type of views and beliefs;

2) social and financial status;

3) alleged psychological, psychiatric, or neurological "disorders"

4) alleged "conflicts" with medical doctors or institutions;

5) ethnic origin and my Immigration file;

6) (and) if there are any indications of information about me on Internet.

B. If - while accessing my file - any MD would see something special, like "social anxiety or delusion", "neurologic disorder", etc.

C. I'll appreciate a copy of a such references. "

Conformément à l'article 47 de la Loi sur l'accès aux documents des organismes publics et sur la protection des renseignements personnels (L.R.Q., c. A-2.1). le CUSM répondra à votre demande dans un délai de vingt (20) jours civils, sauf si:

* Un avis de prolongation d'un maximum de dix (10) jours est

demandé par le CUSM parce que le traitement de la demande dans le délai


1/2 Campagne Les meilleurs soins pour la vie \ The

Best Care for Life Champaign


Centre universitaire de santé McGill \ McGill University Health Centre


Charles Gauthier


Responsable accès a l'information (par intérim)

Responsable -Access to Information (Intérim)


2155 Guy, Montréal (Québec) Canada H3H 2R9

633- 2155 rue Guy

Montréal QC CANADA H3H :R9

Tel 514 934-1934 71864


prévu ne lui parait pas possible sans nuire au déroulement normal de

ses activités;

* Un avis est donné à un tiers concerné, en vertu de l'article 49 de la Loi;

* La demande n'est pas suffisamment précise pour en permettre le traitement, auquel cas le CUSM devra vous porter assistance afin d'identifier les documents susceptibles de contenir les renseignements demandés. Prenez note qu'à défaut de donner suite à une demande d'accès dans les délais applicables, le responsable est réputé avoir refusé l'accès au(x) document(s) demandés. Dans le cas d'une demande écrite, ce défaut donne ouverture au recours en révision préT par la section III du chapitre IV, comme s'il s'agissait d'un refus d'accès. Veuillez agréer. Monsieur Gunin, nos salutations distinguées.

Charles Gauthier

Responsable désigné de l'accès aux documents et à la protection des renseignements personnels.

CG/nr


p.y Avis de recours


Fax 514 934-8567

charles.gaurthier@ijmuhc.incgill.ca

cusin.ca inuhc.ca)


2/2 Campagne Les meilleurs soins pour la vie \ The

Best Care for Life Champaign


Centre universitaire de santé McGill \ McGill University Health Centre


Avis de recours

À la suite dune décision rendue en verni de la Loi sur Faeces aux documents des organismes publics et sur la protection des renseignements personnels.

Révision par la Commission d'accès â l'information

a) Pouvoir:

L'article 135 de la Loi prévoit qu'une personne dont la demande écrite a été refusée en tout ou en partie par le responsable de l'accès aux documents ou de la protection des renseignement s personnels peut demander a la Commission d'accès à l'information de réviser cette décision. La demande de révision doit être faite par écrit; elle peut exposer brièvement les raisons pour lesquelles la décision devrait être révisée (art 137).

L'adresse de la Commission d'accès à l'information est la suivante:


Québec 575, rue St-Amable

Bureau 1.10

Québec (Québec) G1R2G4


Tel. : 418 528-7741

Téléc. : 418 529-3102

Numéro sans frais

1 888 -528-7741


Montréal, 500. boul. René Lévesque Ouest

Tél. : 514 873-4196

Téléc. : 514 844-6170


Bureau 18.200

Montréal (Québec) H2Z 1W7

Numéro sans frais : 1 888 -528-7741


b) Motifs:

Les motifs relatifs à la révision peuvent porter sur la décision, sur le délai de traitement de la demande, sur le mode d'accès à un document ou à un renseignement, sur les frais exigibles ou sur l'application de l'article 9 (notes personnelles inscrites sur un document, esquisses, ébauches, brouillons, notes préparatoires ou autres documents de même nature qui ne sont pas considérés comme des documents d'un organisme public).

c) Délais :

Les demandes de révision doivent être adressées à la Commission d'accès à l'information dans les 30 jours suivant la date de la décision ou de l'expiration du délai accordé au responsable pour répondre à une demande

(art. 135).

La Loi prévoit spécifiquement que la Commission d'accès à l'information peut, pour motif raisonnable, relever le requérant du défaut de respecter le délai de 30 jours (art. 135).

(end of citation)


CHAPTER 2.


- 6 -


On July 30, 2015, a message from Mr. Robert Cox - personally - arrived by e-mail.

(Dr. Robert Cox: the head of the office of access to information and protection of personal data of McGill medical institutions; and, at the same time, an important functionary of security service of McGill-affiliated medical institutions).

As a matter of fact, this is a very strange letter, as no information was provided in it, except the message that Mister Cox will be away from his office (apparently, rather for long time).

(See below)


The letter from Mr. Robert Cox; July 30, 2015. (My letter to his office was sent on June 20, 2015). The 2-nd reply to my complaint inquiry according to the law on access to information, sent on July 30, 2015.


-----

The letter from Mr. Robert Cox:

--------


Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 16:04:21 -0400 [30/07/15 04:04:21 PM EDT]

From:

robert.cox@muhc.mcgill.ca

To: leog@total.net

Subject: Robert Cox is out of the office


I will be out of the office starting 06/25/2015 and will not return until

09/08/2015.


Merci pour votre courriel, je suis pas а mon bureau présentement. Pour

toute urgence, veuillez contacter Maitre Harris Poulis а l'adresse

électronique suivante: harris.poulis@muhc.mcgill.ca ou par téléphone

514-934-1934 ext.: 71559


Thank you for your email, I am presently away from my office. For any

urgent matters, kindly direct your request to Maitre Harris Poulis at the

following email address: harris.poulis@muhc.mcgill.ca or by telephone

514-934-1934 ext.: 71559


Nous sommes lа pour vous - www.cusm.ca

We're here for you - www.muhc.ca


- 7 -


Only in the middle of August 2015, I received an answer from the ombudsman, Mister Pascal Valois. This document was (certainly) composed much later, but registered backdating; or (if it was really written on August 29, 2015) it was sent more than 2 weeks later. However, considering the excuse, which opens this document, it was certainly registered backdating by some clerk, not by Mister Pascal Valois himself:


The reply to my complaint (signed by Mr. Valois), allegedly (judging by the date), written on July 29, 2015, p. 1.


The reply to my complaint dated on July 29, 2015, p. 2.


The reply to my complaint dated on August 29, 2015, p. 3.

...........


See below: the full test of the letter of Mr. Pascal Valois:


...........

July 29 2015


Lev Ginin,

Montreal, Quebec


Dear Mr. Gunin,


First, please accept my apology for the delay in responding to your email complaint sent on June 11 2015. Your complaint concerned in particular the nursing care you received in the Emergency Department (E.D.) of The Montreal General Hospital (MGH) on April 24 2015 where you presented with symptoms of wrist pain.


In our telephone discussion on June 12-th we discussed the procedure you should follow for any request to have a chart note corrected, retracted or amended which must be directed, by law, in writing to the person in charge of all access to information issues for the MUHC, I informed you that you can send a written request, with all justifying facts supporting your request, asking for existing mechanisms.


On April 24 in the E.D. the interaction with the triage nurse was not productive. You state in your complaint that "instead of listening" to your assessment of your wrist the nurse "abruptly interrupted" your story, "unreasonably elevating her voice, speaking with irritation and in a menacing tone of an enforced authority". According to you this nurse "demonstratively treated" you as a "criminal or a terrorist"**. She would have insisted that you were "mentally ill, have a schizophrenia" or persecution mania, or both". She would have started to "ask such ridiculous questions - suggested special diagnosis as she was a licensed psychiatrist" and "insisted that* you were "suicidal, homicidal, paranoiac, and tried to force" you into "obeying her authority and complying with an obviously ungrounded/unjustified psychiatric evaluation". You felt that she went on to "fabricate sentences allegedly attributed'' to you.


In your letter you demand an apology from this triage nurse, but you note that you are not planning any legal action and don't want the nurse suspended.


MANDATE OK THE ASSISTANT LOCAL COMMISSIONER

As discussed with you, I agreed to:

a) Determine if your complaint was founded

b) Recommend corrective measures, if any

c) Send you a written report of my findings

The complain was examined in accordance with the McGill University Health Center (MUHC) Complaint examination procedure by-law adopted under An Act respecting health services and social services (R.S.Q., chapter S-4.2).

INVESTIGATION AND ANALYSIS

During the course of my examination of your complaint, I spoke with the Nurse Manager of in E.D who in turn interviewed the triage nurse who assessed you on April 24. Both genuinely regret that you felt your experience and care was contrary to good nursing practices.

The Nurse Manager discussed your complaint with the triage nurse and challenged her on her clinical approach in a case such as yours. She addressed the events directly with the nurse who saw you and it is her perception that she used the standard triage approach not having any preconceive opinion of you. The triage nurse did not have a clear understanding of what you were telling her that time and found it difficult to follow your story as it was considered convolute. According to the Nurse Manager's evaluation, the triage nurse asked you the questions she needed to ask to make clinical decisions, which include psychiatric history.

The triage nurse asked for urine sample, which would have triggered an unfavorable reaction on your part. The nurse claims that she did not antagonized you and she is sorry that you felt this might have been the case.

The Nurse Manager emphasized with the triage nurse that the attitude conveyed during triage could lead a patient to perceive he is denied proper care and services. The Nurse Manager reminded to nurse in question and reinforced that they are to provide care and services according to the patient presenting symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

It is understandable that this situation brought its share of challenges for you. In such a stressful context communication is a difficult act to balance and opinions or perception of events often diverge. Following your complaint, the Nurse Manager communicated with her employee to appropriate steps to take in such situations.

The Nurse Manager and her team have asked me to extend their regrets for the difficult at distressing situations you faced as well as with your dissatisfaction with the care and service you received. The Nurse Manager has carefully reviewed the events described in your complaint, which has afforded her the opportunity to reflect on the care and services provided to patients. The Nurse Manager followed-up with the nurse directly involved in your care and reiterated the importance i clear communication with patients.

Based on this examination the Office of the Complaints Commissioner will not make ai recommendations at this time.

All would like to thank you for taking the lime and for making the effort to bring these issue forward as we feel these observations are essential to improve the quality of care on the unit.


RECOURSE

As mentioned previously, if you do not agree with my conclusions you may address your complain to the Protecteur du citoyen at the following address: Protecteur du citoyen. 525 boul. René Lévesque Est, Bureau 1.25, Québec (Québec) Telephone : 1-800-463-5070. Fax: 1-866-902-7130 o by e-mail at protcctcurfo.protcetcunlucitoyen.qc.ca

Please feel free to contact the undersigned if you have further questions.

Sincere regards,

Assistant Complaints Commissioner The Montreal General Hospital

c.c. Carole Filteau, Nurse Manager Emergency Department McGill

..............


As we see, mister Pascal Valois sent the copy of his evaluative letter to Montreal General Hospital's Senior nurse, Madam Carole Filteau.


Certainly, the reply of Mister Valois did not satisfy me.


In his letter, he did not provide any ethical or legal assessment to actions of the triage (reception) nurse, including legitimacy and relevance of her questions; he did not evaluate the nurse's rights to claim that I may have a tendency to suicide and murder.


In the text of Mr. Valois reply, my description of events is provided in the subjunctive inclination, with a syntactic equivalent of the sense, which is contained in the words like "allegedly", "as", "if", etc., as though my words were perceived under a great doubt.


In the same time, the words of the triage nurse are presented by Mr. Valoi without any "alleged" meaning.


It is impossible to assume that mister Valois did not read the official report of the triage nurse, and, if he read it, then he had an opportunity to be convinced (himself) of the accuracy of my words.


Besides, this official triage nurse's report is provided in my statement, which Mr. Valois quotes in his reply-letter (to it).


Therefore, the subjunctive inclination in retelling of my statements was absolutely inappropriate and inacceptable.


Also, Mr. Valoi illegitimately avoiding the question of the legitimacy and legality of the psychiatric examination to which I was subjected.


(It is possible not to doubt that, be at me symptoms of a mental disorder, everything would turn back cardinally differently, much more seriously. But, even if there would be such problems - isn't it the lawlessness: to reduce - to them - such concrete facts and circumstances as loss of the laboratory analyses, deliberate refusal of antibiotics, and unjustified refusal of anti-inflammatory? Unless is not lawlessness - to settle scores with the patient for his justified indignation of the loss of the laboratory analysis: even if there would be such problems?).


But I do not wish anybody's blood, will not gain feeling of revenge, and do not want to spend time and forces on squabbles. So, I just gave up, and thanked Mr. Valoi for merely quoting my words and retelling the real narrative of my statement, because another official on Mr. Valoi's place could completely distort my words, or to subjects them to censorship, or altogether.


(I will add that - if - in the nurse's official report her insinuation about my alleged "thirst for suicide and murders" is given in the form of a question, during real events it was presented in an affirmative form, considering her tone, the context, and also declarative - even affirmative - lexicon and syntax).


Here - below - is my following message to Mr. Valois:


I give the original text (2-nd version) of this letter sent to Monsieur Pascal Valois below:


To: MGH Ombudsman

ombudsman@much.mcgill.ca

MUHC Office of the Ombudsman

1650 Cedar Room E6.164

Montreal, Qc H3G 1A4

Pascale Valois,

tel. 514-934-1934 ext 44285.


Dear Mr. Valois!

Thank you for your noble response.

Obviously, you took no sides, analyzing facts objectively.

Though I have not received what I demanded (a written apology from the triage nurse), I am quite satisfied by your answer. I believe that here, in Quebec, we have one of the best health systems in the world, and keeping it working is the most important task and priority. Placing my personal expectations after my social consciousness, I"ll take no further steps or actions.

I believe that my complaint has played a positive role in preserving the "human face" of Quebec"s health system, because libeling a patient just because of some his doubts about tests or MD"s actions puts an end to a civilized approach. Even police profiling is unacceptable for a civil society, and profiling in medical institutions is much, much worse.

Hopefully, with our joint efforts, we"ll keep things within lucid and reasonable frames.

Sincerely appreciating your response,

Lev (Leon) Gunin.

______________________________________________

Montreal, August 27, 2015.

..........


See the screenshot image of my email message below:


My reply (see above) to the letter of Monsieur Valois sent on August 27, 2015.


(From the context of my chronicle, it is clear that (even in 2015, despite my bad experience) I still really considered Quebec-Canadian medical system as one of the best in the world, but it revolves and refuses to work for 2 reasons:

1) to commercialization and privatization of the entire health care system;

2) attempts to turn Canada into a police state.

I tried to hide a sneer as deeply as possible, hiding my true attitude to Mr. Valois's reply, and, at the same time, to express everything that I would tell him privately, in a streamline shape).


And, again, nevertheless, Mr. Valois could make his message more adverse and destructive for me, and - at first - I - exactly - considered so (during the period of sending the above-mentioned email letter of response to Mr. Valois).

However, already soon I reevaluated his reply, and concluded that - if he made his answer even more adverse for me, and would cause even bigger damage (besides the damage caused by this provocation in ER itself), THERE they, possibly, considered that THEN I would not stop here, and would inflate this case what they wanted to avoid.


.....................


Thus, having received and having read not satisfying me Monsieur Valois's message, I, having weighed all "pro" and "contra", decided that monsieur Valois could produce even more destructive for me incident's assessment (only later I understood that - on situational-political reasons - he could hardly produce both less, and more adverse for me letter).

For the ethical, confidential, and security reasons, I did not begin to insist on further trial, and put a temporary point (more true, dots) in this case.

Therefore, I decided to represent a formal appreciation, and submitted the text of my reply to his letter by fax (August 27, 2015) and by e-mail (August 29, 2015) - addressed to Monsieur Valois.


The details of this e-mail are given above.

____________________________


CHAPTER 3.


- 8 -


(see below the requisites of my letter to ombudsman)


- 9 -

While the administration of medical institutions systematically blocks my access to my medical documents (to lab tests, ultrasound, X-rays, etc.), the third parties have unlimited access to my medical files.


Leak of information probably occurs on all 3 channels:

1) the overhearing of mine phone calls definitely gives an access to a wide range of persons and organizations;

2) perlustration of my e-mails also gives an access to my medical history to a wide range of persons;

3) leak also happens directly from medical institutions: doctors' offices, medical laboratories, computer systems of the medical institutions connected with McGill University.


Here is one of the typical examples.


After my reminders, Dr. Rohan's secretary called me on July 21, 2015, to report about the result on bacterial microorganisms (microbiological culture): otherwise, I did not know whether to begin the course of antibiotics. Then Dr. Rohan spoke with me on the phone.


During the phone call, the doctor pointed to me also that the glucose indicator in blood is slightly higher than the norm, at the level of pre-diabetes. I answered that I already noticed it in previous blood tests and that it is necessary to talk about it separately during the next appointment. It was an only time when a doctor warned me about sugar level - since 2013.


On the same day, July 22, 2015, I was bombarded by "tons" of spam on diabetes.


This case is remarkable by the fact that

a) I did not speak to anybody about the sugar in blood yet, and did not discuss this problem in electronic (or post) correspondence, and did not conduct ant search on this subject in search engines like Google, Yahoo, Yandex, etc;

b) in my series of documentary articles nothing was told yet about a hyperglycemia problem;

c) I NEVER before received spam on diabetes.


All this incontestably demonstrates that the information was filtered to spammers from my phone conversation with the doctor.


In other cases, the "medical" spam begins to arrive at once after my visit to that or other specialist doctor (dentist, otolaryngologist, etc.), and likewise the spam subject completely corresponds to a profile of the doctor whom I just visited. (See below the images)


Spam on diabetes in my mail (in mailbox).


[To show all dozens of spam messages on diabetes difficult since they are interspersed in corps of others letters, which addressees I would not like "to shine" for reasons of safety and confidentiality. Only from June 22 to June 27, about 60 spam messages on diabetes arrived. After that, such messages sharply stopped - it is just another proof of their connection with my phone conversation with the doctor.] (See below the image of a typical spam message)


One of similar messages (spam) on diabetes, July 22, 2015. (See above)


Since July 23, 2015, the volume of the "medical" spam started to pose a real challenge for my mailbox, and every portion of spam had direct relation to my real health problems, and, simultaneously, to my most recent visits to doctors.


I had to do something about it, and wrote a complaint letter to Access Information MUHC (see below).


The outraged situation, when they blocked access for me to my personal information, but granted an unlimited access to my personal information for all strangers, has fairly enraged me.


On July 29, 2015, I sent 3 letters to the office of access to information and its protection, addressed to the same Mr. Robert Fox.

In this letter, I pointed that whereas for I information to my medical documents am blocked, the third parties freely get access to my medical files. In total me was 3 similar letters are sent, in each of which the example on one was given to specific similar case. On one of my letters, I did not receive any answer. It is above - an example of one of these 3 letters.


- 10 -


Now, let us sum up the results.


Since 1994, my immigration file was one of those, which haunted representatives of the country, where I (with my family members) was taken by force (and, after 3.5 years, escaped to Canada). My file exposed what is going on in that state, and - thereby - hurt its already low international reputation.


The embassy of that country in Canada and its ethnic lobby in Canadian capital - Ottawa - did everything possible to destroy the legal bases of our refugee case. Having huge influence on Federal Immigration, but without having similar influences on Quebec Immigration department, these people "missed" the decision of Quebec (French) Immigration in our favor, and decided "to kill" it with the help of a counterfeit fluorography, which, allegedly, exposed tuberculosis.


Despite all obstacles and delays, and police-style methods of Federal Immigration, I managed to prove that this "tubercular" fluorography is a forgery.


After my complaints and exposure of medical institutions, which are carrying out oppressive police-style orders of the Ministry of Immigration, my address (concerning the counterfeit official report of fluorography) in UN Human Rights Committee - and - against the background of wide popularity of my ideas in Eastern Europe - the same forces - presumably - started a revenge, and decided "to finish" my activity by means of undermining my health, and, at the same time, by throwing - into the database of medical institutions - information representing me as hypochondriac and antisocial type, which created huge problems for me in receiving the medical care.


However, the activity of this particular foreign government and its pseudo-ethnic lobby in Canada was just a petite element of a bigger puzzle, because they never considered me as a sizeable threat or a real enemy, and did not estimate me as a big figure. Of course, even a "small" spark of hostility from such a powerful force has already destroyed my life, my professional career, and my socio-economic status, but the most devastating blow to my health and, in general, to my life - was strike by the united horde of neo-feudal - neo-totalitarian international and British antidemocratic movement, which punishes just ANY resistance. This tremendous shift to worldwide dictatorships immediately imposed such a tyrannical global censorship, which is characterized not only by politically-ideologically established taboos, but also (as under the power of absolutism) by strict regulations of WHO is allowed and WHO is forbidden to say this or that. Thus, even my works of the Soviet era, which criticized the Soviet regime; and my resistance in general: automatically placed me under the penalizing axe of the punitive health care.


The urological infection, which - for the first time - was found on January 1, 2001, and which coincided with the threats of immigration officials to "award" me with urological illness for "disobedience" - could be "simply" a coincidence, but could be...


From 2001 to 2015, the epic of sabotage of diagnoses, loss, or falsification of the laboratory analyses, ignoring of the most important symptoms, and concealment of some doctors' mistakes by other doctors (or even deliberate harm to my health by some other doctors) followed.


Something (or someone) forced medical institutions and my doctors to believe in the fact that I am, allegedly, experiencing suspiciousness / unreasonable exaggeration of my health problems), or - even worse - hypochondriac syndrome.


Thereby, a damaging mistrust to my words, to my description of syndromes and symptoms of my indispositions was provoked since then, and treatment of me as with disfranchised person.


That is why - as it looks - the office of McGill medical institutions' Access to Information and Protection of Personal Data never responded to my request and never opened my file for me.


I am almost sure that - since 2007 (after I was hit by the car) - a real and direct pressure was put on doctors.


Approximately, since 2011, it already was, it is necessary to believe, not veiled, but an open pressure; the continuous refusals of medications prescription and medical exams could be connected with it.


When, because of the spread (in medical institutions) "precautionary" information about me and pressure upon doctors, multiplied "mistakes" and doctors' (and medical institutions) "miscalculations", which actions could entail for itself - at least - scandals, have began to grow, talks and records about hypochondria were considered "not enough", and then already "psychiatric" provocations became desirable.


These "psychiatric" provocations could be "lowered" from above and prepared in coordination with the enforcement agencies. Some doctors were forced to participate in them. As for this particular provocation in the emergency department (April 24, 2015), there are no doubts left that it would be impossible without participation of medical administration, and, perhaps, with participation of security agencies (at least of the security of the same McGill University).


If it was differently: then, under the Canadian laws on access to information, I would receive though some notice, let us assume, of the refusal in access to documents, or a concrete response to my inquiry, or the satisfaction of my demands (shown in a written form as it is possible to see (see above), etc.


But, since the beginning of 2015 and till 2018 (running forward), I did not receive ANY reply or a notice, and it is obvious that I will never receive.


Not only that - during this time - the answers, which I demanded from McGill University medical institutions' administration (there are about 10 huge hospitals and also - clinics, policlinics, medical offices, diagnostic centers, research institutes, etc., etc.), could be completely jammed, and documents, which I demanded, could be destroyed; but, perhaps, the lack of ANY respond from such a body as L'adresse de la Commission d'accès l'information (and others, from which I demanded access to information and answers on my inquires stated in writing) - in itself is unprecedented in Canada, where - at least formally - laws would be still executed strictly in 2015.


For this reason, [because - in other country, where laws even formally are not executed, and, on the contrary, are ignored, and mine complain-inquiry would completely disappear without a trace in general (at best)]: I received replies from some other institutions, though absolutely not such replies, which had to materialize according to democratic and to legal principles.


On the other hand, silence means consent.


And, if the response to my inquiry in my personal case (but indirectly coming down to a question of whether such security agencies as the Ministry of Immigration (that includes police, intelligence agencies, etc.) and other - are connected with the attitude towards specific patients in medical institutions in Canada; and whether is not present in mine "personal record" (somewhere in the "medical KGB" database) a description of political, ideological, or "psychiatric" insinuations, which provoke hostile, provocative and cruel attitude towards me in medical institutions) - was silence: not whether it is an indirect confirmation of an affirmative answer on my question?


CHAPTER 4.


- 11 -


In October 2015, came a strange call on my home phone number.


Someone called, pretending to be a "lawyer" and taken me unawares (without having caught his name, I did not ask again taken by surprise).


The lawyer (in quotes or without) claimed that he could to achieve "justice" for me, and took an interest whether I received letters from Mr. Robert Cox.


In response to my silence, he said that through Mr. Cox I will achieve nothing, and asked whether I know, who Dr. Arthur Porter is.


Without having waited for the answer (again), he asked whether it is known to me that in 2009 Dr. Porter twice consulted about me.


Further, the talk (after my warning that I have no money for lawyers) went about an "absolutely small sum", and the conversation was clogged on it.


The caller ID highlighted an anonymous call.


Not only the fact that this call could represent an inquiry of my intentions apropos addressing to a medical lawyer (and anything else), but also the mention of Dr. Porter: this is a very direct connection with my personal story, because Dr. Arthur Porter's case - is a fine illustration of the connection between the medical domain - and the repressive and power structures (Immigration department, police, intelligence agencies, ministries, politicians, etc.), the most extreme groups of corporate sharks, organized crime, and governments of foreign countries.


The whole activity of Dr. Porter is an exposure of such communications.


And, at last, one more letter, which I received on March 10, 2017: the strangest of all letters on this case - though I did not present yet the correspondence with the ombudsman of St.-Mary's Hospital, Madam Sara-Beth Trudeau (see my request for her name, her response to my inquiry, and mine final reply to her respond: see all this at the very end of this strange story).


But - even against the background of my correspondence with Madam Trudeau - the letter from the office of Mr. Robert Cox in 2017: the top all improbable things (see below):


Here it is said that Mr. Robert Cox will be absent from office from June 15, 2015, till December 31, 2017.


First, it looks like an attempt to justify the absence of any response to my inquiry by the absence of Mr. Cox.


But I submitted my inquiry not within a framework of my personal correspondence with Dr. Cox, but sent it to a concrete organization - The commission of Access to Information (La Commission d'accès et l'information) - according to all procedural and legal modus operandi and requirements, and, so, if Mr. Cox is away from the office, there must be someone else, who must take care of my case.


Secondly, sudden disappearance of the head of an important bureau and his two-year absence - while he continues to remain formally on his post: is an unprecedented case (in itself).


See above (the images): Professor Robert Cox (at the left). Robert Cox Jr. (on the right).

(Whether there is a family likeness?)


Certainly, this is a very strange situation, but it is necessary to know who such Robert Cox was.


This is a famous historian, jurist, lawyer, and economist, professor of Montreal's McGill and Concordia Universities, and high-ranking official of UN (born in 1926).


Risking to go deep into abstract subjects and to penetrate the area of unconfirmed rumors, I, still, cannot hold them back - if I am guided by independent opinion of experts from other countries (not familiar with the Universités de Montréal and situation in them).


Giving out these rumors, I, nevertheless, separate myself from them, since, without having enough information, I cannot tell anything into their account, and I only retell them "as is", without adding nothing and taking away nothing.


Here, in brief, are their echoes.


There were 5-7 enough influential groups at McGill University (including the faculty of medicine - practical an entire "separate" university ("University in University"), so huge that also includes a number of hospitals (10?) and others objects), 3 of which are at enmity not on life, but to death. It is the simplest to define one of them, which represents influential Jewish circles and Jewish lobby, which is also connected with the State of Israel in Palestine.


It achieved such an influence since the epoch of Leo Jaffe - an ominous figure, heading this university in 1970-s (in 1940-s Jaffe worked on the project of the atomic bomb).


It is not so simple to designate and outline other influential groupings; for this purpose, it is necessary to distract ourselves from the subject of this chronology - devoting to this subject too much attention. For our story, it is important only to underline the fact that Robert Cox, by hearsay, adjoined to a group, which was headed by Dr. Arthur Porter and Dr. Vassilios Papadopoulos.


This "shadow" group was actually just a cover for 3-4 other groups of influence: Christian Zionists, pro-British, pro-"multiculturalism", and pro-Israeli groups of the university, pretending to be an independent force for hiding pro-British and pro-Israeli broad support and influence, and to carry out (under its cover) doubtful financial and administrative transactions-operations, hiding them from other - "hostile" - groups.


But an opinion dominated - in circles of investigative journalism - that all 5-7 groups cooperate in the sphere of criminal activity, and are connected with the organized crime.


(See below: Dr. Porter and Dr. Papadopoulos)


Doctor A. Porter and Dr. Papudopulos.


If - among the passive members of the mentioned 5-7 groups (and among adjoining to them), there were sane and decent people, no angels could be detected among these groups' heading persons.


Also, Dr. Arthur Porter, the head of "the medical university" ("university within university"), was not an exception.


In 2011, during one discussion, an opinion was expressed that the whole activity of Dr. Porter (Arthur Thomas Porter IV, born in 1956) was launched for the benefit of (mostly of) 1 Asian and 2 Middle Eastern (1 non-Arab, and 1 Arab (its only truthful ally) states.


Dr. Porter was, allegedly, an intermediary and the coordinator of the interests of these 3 regimes in Asia-Africa frontier (Dr. Porter was an African origin); Bahamas (Porter developed friendly, cozy relations with the Bahamas government; he founded an oncological center on the Bahamas); Denmark (his mother was Dane); England and USA (where he studied and worked, holding very important posts), and Canada (where he also held incredibly high and influential positions).


Dr. Arthur Thomas Porter IV had links to Africa, Bahamas, Denmark, UK, and US, and was considered as a mediator and adviser of some African regimes. By his educational background, he was administrator of medical institutions and expert in radiology.


Dr. Porter was also a specialist in such a range of domains as secret services and security issues, counterintelligence and the administration and security of computer and electronic technologies. On September 3, 2008, Canada"s PM Stephen Harper (the head of the most corrupted and irresponsible government in Canadian history) appointed Dr. Porter to the post of the head of Canadian Security Intelligence Review Committee: the body, which supervised the activity of Canadian Security Intelligence Service.


At the same time (since February, 2004) Porter worked as the Director General and CEO of McGill University Health Centre in Montreal (Quebec), one of 2 largest academic medical centers in Canada. He also occupied some of other very important posts in both Canada, and USA. At the same time, Dr. Porter was engaged in a number of doubtful business operations, and worked for some foreign governments. This was not simply striking, but a scandalous conflict of interests, which did not alert Harper' regime about Dr. Porter"s intentions and aspirations.


According to information, which I managed to obtain, Mr. Robert Cox Sr., and Dr. Porter were not just colleagues, connected by the job, but had informal personal relationships.


Dr. Porter could ask about me not only regarding my previous complains, but also in connection with my anti-surveillance activism, and my criticism of massive demolitions of the historic architecture, and devastation of Montreal"s parks and green zones, because the project of McGill"s super hospital (near Vendome metro station) was probably already discussed in 2009.


The construction and engineering firms have never got to the center of my criticism.


Instead, I pointed to banks and giant corporations as the prime cause of the devastation of our cultural, social, natural, historical and architectural heritage. And, still, theoretically, SNC-Lavalin could spot me through its corporate glasses as an indirect reference to my criticism could irritate people like Gwyn Morgan. He headed Lavalin"s Board of directors in 2006, and exactly in 2006 have started the campaign of police intimidation, which I faced till late 2015. (PM Stephen Harper also occupied his office from 2006 to 2015). Back in 2007-2010, I noticed 2 security cars that intercepted my movements at main intersections. 3 or 4 times I saw both of them parked at 2 locations of SNC-Lavalin" head office (one was at Belmont St.). I already described this in 2016, in my well-documented record on medical crimes.


To remove everything that blocked his access to a colossal bribe, Dr. Porter did the utmost to rebuff all competing with SNC companies - to secure the contract for SNC-Lavalin anyway.


During the most important meeting, when two competing companies made their proposals, both representatives of MUHC - Dr. Porter and his accomplice, senator David Angus - suddenly left the meeting at its full blast, just to return back and declare a break in the selection procedure. [David Angus was connected to different Jewish Zionist organizations, and - as a person, who was born in an English-speaking province of Canada, - hardly had a special sentimentality to Quebec; as a conservative, he was involved in fundraising for Conservative party (Progressive Conservative Party of Canada by then), and at the time of Brian Mulroney - he was the main collector of donations for the needs of conservatives; in 1983 - chairman of Computer Canada Finance, and later also was engaged in finance; in 1984, he was appointed Queen's Counsel, and was invited to the Atmosphere Canada council from 1985 to 2004; Stephen Harper made Angus the head of the financial department of the Conservative Finance Canada (2005); in June, 1993, the Governor General Ray Hnatyshyn appointed him to the Senate as an assistant to Prime Minister Mulroney; Angus also held a post of the adviser in management of the medical center MUHC, and was on the board of the MUHC, co-signing after Dr. Arthur Porter; he also was a co-chair of the management of the Energy, the Environment and Natural Resources (2009-2010); chair of the Energy, the surroundings and Natural Assets (2009-2010) Bank, and Trade, and Business (2007-2008); vice-chair of the Special Committee about Senate Reform (2006-2007), and Bank, Trade, and Business (1996-2007). To evade accusation for bribery and fraud, he fled from Canada (as Arthur Porter) to Panama.]


David Angus is just another example of the perversity of the system that allows people like Angus to be appointed to so many key positions (which manifests a clear conflict of interests), and hold so many posts, accumulating an enormous power and influence; it is just another example of how deeply Canadian politicians are corrupted and to which degree both leading parties are subordinated to a pseudo-Masonic lodge (which try to sublimate true Masonic organizations), to tribal ultra-nationalistic groups and foreign governments. It is just another example how some non-elected personalities receive same governmental work as elected deputies, getting an access to the decision-making process, which must be reserved only to the elected officials, and become more influential than the MP-s. This is one of the greatest problems in Western democracies.


Thus, Dr. Porter received education as an administrator in the field of medicine and as a specialist in radiation oncology, but also in the field of security and spy-technologes.


Some opinions were expressed, that Porter not only was connected with the Middle Eastern' intelligence services, but directly worked for them.


It is impossible to verify this opinion - as well as an opposite opinion: that the group, which was headed by Dr. Porter, was not an ally of the most influential group at McGill, but, on the contrary, was its competitor and last opponent.


But - for whoever Dr. Porter worked, - he was one of those criminals who, in favor to the anti-Christian lobby, money-bags, and corporations, destroyed the historical Royal Victoria Hospital complex, and carried out the construction of 2 hospitals-monsters (affiliated with 2 - English and French - universities) in the historical districts of Montreal, - which, together with several other projects, actually destroyed the architectural-historical face of Montreal, this absolutely unique city, an only large "island of Europe" on American continent.


And, let us not to loose from sight that he was also known as an expert in intelligence, liaison, and security issues, counterintelligence, and administration and safety of computer and electronic technologies.


If exclusively clean traditions reigned in medical institutions and medical centers of McGill University, and obvious conflicts of interests would be intolerant, the core of Porter's swindle would get cracked in the germ. And Porter - already from the very beginning - used dishonest, being evident untidiness of tricks.


To be sure that nothing blocks him an access to a huge bribe, he did everything possible, to send away all competing rivals of SNC company, and to bid the contract anyway to SNC-Lavalin.


During the most decisive meeting, when two competing companies presented their offers, both representatives of MUHC - Porter and his accomplice, senator David Angus [David Angus was connected with different Zionist organizations; and, as person, who was born in the English-speaking province of Canada, hardly had a special sentimentality to Quebec; he was the conservative involved in fund raising for Conservative party (at that time - Progressive Conservative Party of Canada), and - in Brian Mulroney times - was the chief collector of donations for conservatives' needs; in 1983 - he became the chairman of Computer Canada Finance, and later - also was engaged in financing; in 1984, he was appointed the Adviser to the Queen (Queen's Counsel), and was also invited to the council of Atmosphere Canada - from 1985 to 2004; Stephen Harper appointed him the head of financial department of Conservative Finance Canada (2005); in June, 1993 the governor general of Ray Hnatyshyn appointed him in the Senate as assistant to the minister Mulroney; Angus also held the adviser's post in the management of the MUHC medical center at Arthur Porter; he was a member of the management of Energy, the surroundings and Natural Assets Bank (2009-010); member of Trade, and Business (2007-2008); member of Special Committee on Senate Reform (2006-007); member of Bank, Trade, and Business (1996-2007)] - both suddenly left this meeting in the heat of the meeting: to return later and announce a break in the procedure of selection.


Later Dr. Porter eagerly defended his decision to exclude (under an absurd pretext) the company-competitor - the Spanish company OHL - and even stated this question before the provincial cabinet of Parti Liberal Québécois, that was responsible for new MUHC project, trying to convince them to choose SNC-Lavalin.


All this should end with a failure of Dr. Porter"s efforts, and the government should be compelled to begin the auction anew with the higher acquisition offer, but - in March 2010 - SNC-Lavalin received this contract after all - in spite of the fact that the offer proposed by OHL was much better, and the sum that the OHL was ready to offer: definitely higher.


All signals coming from the conscious ranking officers to the highest governmental authorities about suspicions of Dr. Porter's frauds, were ignored: just as all MY complaints to McGill University medical centers' ombudsmen - were ignored.


Madame Sarah Beth Trudeau was charged to answer my complaint concerning systematic disappearances of my laboratory test results, perhaps, because she has the same family name as the Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, or was indeed related to this célèbre family. Madame Trudeau explained the loss of one of my tests as a single human error, ignoring the systematic nature of such incidents, and the facts of further cover up, and falsification of the medical documents.


In 2007 (when I was hit by car, and was refused any medical help in St.-Mary's Hospital's Emergency Department (while police completely ignored my declaration about this incident), and in 2011, I turned directly to 4 high-ranking MUHC bureaucrats, including Dr. Porter, but all mine complains were left without any response.


In 2012, Dr. Arthur Porter suddenly fled to Latin America, but in 2013 (when my eyes were injured) he, and his wife Pamela, were arrested in Panama - on request of the Canadian government, on charges of fraud.


The construction of McGill"s grandiose super-hospital (near Decarie and St.-Caterine West) was not needed in principle, and just wasted 1 (one) and a half billion dollars, and the bribes, which Dr. Porter received for advancing this project and for his favor for SNC-Lavalin, were estimated up to 20 or 25 million dollars.


Charges were also laid against British citizen and expert in public and corporate relations, and informant for the British conservatives - St. Clair Armitage; former director of MUHC Yanai Elbaz and his brother Yohann Elbaz (lawyer) [both: co-directors of the Pan Global Holdings - financial money laundering company]; [people with the same family name were known in Israel]; former SNC-Lavalin's chief Pierre Duhaime; one of its managers: Stephane Roy; SNC-Lavalin"s employee Riadh Ben Aissa (possibly - Saudi Arabia or Israel's); and an "unknown" Jeremy Morris (whose identity was keep a secret). (About this one (who is actually J. Morris - see below).


My attempts to learn if Mr. Jeremy Morris has any links (by his family line) to Dr. (urologist) Brian Morris (who played a sinister role in the declining of my health and in my 2-years medical drama) - failed. Both worked at McGill, and both could have a history of connections to former British island territories.


NOBODY incurred any punishments, and it - partially - because doctors in Canada: is an "untouchable caste", and anything that they are up to - escapes punishment.


Incredibly, but, nevertheless, ANY of the participants of this "swindle of the century" was ever condemned, except of Dr. Porter"s widow, for whom, however, a prison term was replaced by a "conditional", so that she served it... at home... NOBODY incurred any punishment, and it is - partially - because doctors in North America is an "untouchable caste", and because the corporations, which are protected by big banks" and big loans" umbrella, enjoy the impunity. Neither Charbonneau Commission, nor Police du Québec, neither Royal Canadian Mounted Police, nor Quebec's anti-corruption squad (UPAC), neither Interpol, nor the court: nobody could bring them to justice.


Impunity and incompetence of doctors already acquired legends and parables; anything that they are up to - escapes punishment.


Another protecting shield over the wrongdoing of Dr. Porter, other doctors, and SNC-Lavalin is relating to 4 foreign states, which interests and reputation are defended in Canada for any cost. That"s why some of the participants of this affair could not face indictment in Canada, and were never prosecuted. At least, 3 of them are citizens of one of these 4 states: Dr. Porter himself (and, probably, his wife), St. Clair Armitage, and Jeremiah Morris.


Among Porter's accomplices and his main business partners - there were at least 3 Israelis (it is extremely difficult to verify this information, because - in Canada - Israel is an "untouchable" state, which eludes any critics, and because any information about Israel's connection with international organized crime is a taboo), which played key role in Porters' frauds. There were also 3 citizens of Great Britain: Dr. Porter himself, St.-Claire Armitage, and Jeremy Morris.


In his own book of memoirs - The Man Behind the Bow Tie: Arthur Porter on Business, Politics and Intrigue; in cooperation with T. R. Todd, September 12, 2014 - Porter denied any participation in this largest criminal swindle in Canadian history.


In 2011, Porter received the diplomatic passport of the island state of St.-Kitts and Nevis, where he organized the foundation of an oncological center.


Arthur Porter was closely connected with the former pro-Israeli lobbyist, weapons dealer and former high-ranking officer of Israeli intelligence, Arye bin-Menashe, located in Montreal. (It can indirectly both to confirm information on Porter's main "roof", and deny it (because Bin-Menashe himself became a derelict (pariah) in Israel).


David Angus was his other closest accomplice, another pro-Israeli lobbyist.


There were his 2 closest "companions".


His closest business partner in doubtful financial transactions in Turkey, island states, and England, was Karol Sikora.


Porter was also connected with the lawyer Ricardo Bilonick Paredes, one of the chief assistants to criminal Panama dictator, Manuel Noriega.


It is easy to notice that Arthur Porter's appointment was initially immoral, and, perhaps, illegal - because of the conflict of interests, and that was obvious in advance: the conflict of interests creates - potentially - the soil for future financial and other crimes.


But the conflict of interests - pricks eyes everywhere in the network of McGill medical institutions.


Robert Cox and many other "appointees": also were put on numerous posts contrary to an obvious conflict of interests.


Despite Arthur Porter's arrest in Panama, and Canadian demand to extradite him for court hearings in Canada, his deportation (extradition) case was deliberately protracted for 2 years, because - as claims an article in The Canadian Broadcasting Corporation press (Canadian Broadcasting Corporation, July 2, 2015) - in Stephen Harper's government of that time, nobody wished that Porter should appear before the court and began to SPEAK; and the Panama's regime did not wish it for the same reasons.


Porter died of cancer in a hospital in Panama on June 30, 2015.


Such is an official version.


And what happened actually... nobody ever learns...


It is worth stopping now in more detail on Jeremy Morris's identity: not only because the press and investigation (in Porter's case) "coded" Dr. Jeremy Morris - without disclosing, who is he, - but also because he is Brian Morris's namesake, and, theoretically, can be his relative.


Dr. J. Morris is a descendant of English immigrants and native of the British Bahamas, where Dr. Porter, via offshore mechanisms, laundered his dirty money on widely known and well-tested scheme.


J. Morris received his bachelor degree in Queen's University, 1998; masters' degree - in Ryerson/York University, 2005; and doctor's degree (doctor of philosophy (Ph.D.) - in McGill University, Montreal, Quebec (McGill University, 2010).


The Bahamas rather recently gained independence from England, but this would be too exaggerated to call it real independence.


Actually, the Bahamas remain under a vigilant control of England, which carries out numerous "shadowy" political, spy, and financial operations through this island state.


And Canada - officially - is an English dominion to the present day, and the head of Canadian government - is the English queen.


In the light of this political reality, the choice of Bahamas for Porter, who was closely connected to England (where he studied, lived and worked and where he carried out his business projects), and who was a Canadian functionary: is not casual. And Dr. Porter has carried out his financial and money-laundering operations through offshore firms, in which citizens of Great Britain (and Canada) Dr. Jeremiah Morris and Maître St. Clair Armitage - played the pivoral role.


The field of Jeremy Morris's activity was directly connected with business and profits.


A cherished dream of all of most impudent, aggressive, immoral, unscrupulous and criminal-minded businesspeople: it is to make money "from air" ("from "0"; "from nothing") - and getting pure net profit.


Exactly this was the subject of Jeremiah Morris's researches, who studies - how to make money out of digitization of everything that is only possible to present in a digital format.


Theoretically, the researches of J. Morris can also give a key perceptive to the oppressive enforcement agencies of how to block to authors-dissidents even a slightest possibility to sale their own music, visual arts objects, and books.


His researches also concern the issue of piracy and copyright (and, indirectly, help to understand also how to violate the copyright, appropriating income from illegal sale of intellectual property of marginalized authors). And it just what happens to my own musical, literature, historical, etc. works and digital books. [I must stress that I don"t discuss here the intentions of Dr. J. Morris, or the ethics of his thesis, but, merely, how his research can be potentially MISUSED].


Jeremy Morris's activity in Porter's affair was also linked to Cadber Investments company, which, on behalf of one of the central Canadian banks - The Royal Bank of Canada (RBC) - in 1999, opened Panama' lawyer Mossack Fonseca company on British Virgin Islands.


Cadber Investments was operated by Swiss branch of RBC.


Numerous operations on money laundering (for example, "shadowy" contracts' and bribes' transactions, etc.) have been passed through the Cadber Investments company, and, in particular, bribes related to works in Algeria.


RBC employees in Switzerland sent - on behalf of SNC - electronic correspondence to Mossack Fonseca's law firm, and - from there - got replies in the name of Cadber Investments bank.


The RBC bank opened (by means of Mossack Fonseca) more than 370 foreign corporations for clients, which is not "absolutely" legal.


One of dozens of agents involved in the scandalous affairs around SNC-Lavalin (and, at the same time - one of the whipping boys, who were subjected to "imboweling" in order to allow the largest fishes to duck out): this is, for example, a lawyer Constantine Kyres, who (to protect SNC-Lavalin, on SNC-Lavalin management's instructions) tried to get into contact with a material witness (arrested in Switzerland in this company's case), Riadh Ben Aissa, who, in turn, was one of SNC's less high heads, involved in money laundering, fraud, corruption, and others criminal activities. The aim of this contact was to force Ben Aissa to change his testimony, in term to rehabilitate SNC-Lavalin (2014).


Together with Kyres, was exposed Mr. Sami Bebawi, another senior SNC-Lavalin"s operative.


Ben Aissa and Bebawi were also Arthur Porter's accomplices in the McGill University Health Center construction fraud.


Let's give the priority to investigative journalists, to find out whose agents of influence sat at SNC-Lavalin's board of directors; and what political and economic forces were fighting for their interests within the directors' staff; and who were these people.


This company (as the most of other big companies) is connected to a number of organizations, which - on words - deny that they are political organizations and represent interests of foreign states, but, actually, they are political, spying-diversionary, and even oppressive bodies, connected with SNC-Lavalin through the topmost echelons of power in Canada; and, during some periods - as a competing or even resisting force, but, at the same time, on a cooperation platform (that is quite often well-matched in politics and business).


(Abbreviation of "SNC" goes to 1930-s - 1940-s, when 3 partners - Arthur Surveyer, Swiss gidravlik, Emil Nenniger (one more engineer), and Georges Chenevert - founded a joint enterprise).


In 1991, this company merged with Lavalin (Lalonde Valois International Limited), which was founded in 1936 by engineers of Jean-Paul Lalonde and Romeo Valois.


Then (1962), its CEO became Bernard Lamarre.


Other heads of this company (after Lamarr) were Pierre Duhaime (who was arrested and condemned for fraud), Ian Bourne (who was also connected to the similar scandals), Riadh Ben Aissa (arrested and tried in Switzerland for fraud), Stephane Roy (also repeatedly arrested), Michael Novak (also under investigation), and Sami Abdallah Bebawi (he was also arrested in Switzerland) - all involved in numerous scandals. Another General Director - Robert Card - resigned in connection with bribes (and fraud) scandals connected with works in Algeria.


Regarding this affair, police obtained sanctions for arrest of Montreal's businessman Farid Bedjaoui, an intermediary of SNC, who soon disappeared without traces.


Since 2006 and throughout a number of years, the head of SNC-Lavalin"s board of directors remained Gwyn Morgan, a successor of a dynasty of English businessmen and politicians. His close ties with Great Britain were never interrupted. Morgan was born and got education in the most Americanized province of Canada - in Alberta, - which, according to many opinions, is a stronghold unethical enterprises, but I am not a supporter of such generalizations. (Equally, I don't support an opinion that Alberta is the most "anti-Quebec" province of Canada).


Businessman Gwyn Morgan.


Morgan has graduated from the engineering faculty of University of Alberta, and also had a business course at Cornell University. No wonder that his early activity in the 1970-s was connected with the USA where he lived and worked. This agent of the American and English influence actually operated SNC-Lavalin since 2005, but since 2007 became the chairman of board of directors formally, by then (to our knowledge, since 2003) already being in close relations with Stephen Harper, whose assistance and protection made Morgan the most influential businessman and financier in Canada: the head of Canadian Council of Chief Executives, Industry Training Authority, Noblegen Inc., Institute of the Americas, Council for Canadian Unity, The Fraser Institute, American Petroleum Institute, Accenture Energy Advisory Board, Rio Tinto Alcan (Alcan Inc.) and Lafarge North America Inc., and also the director of HSBC Bank Canada bank from December, 1996 to May 2012.


Harper has PERSONALLY chosen Gwyn Morgan to head the Public Appointments Commission, just created by the Harper regime. This appointment was made despite of the astonishing conflict of interests as Morgan was Harper's personal friend, always was the supporter of the Conservative party, and collected donations for conservatives. Besides, Morgan obtained all these posts and appointments at the height of the scandals around SNC-Lavalin, criminal cases in many countries against the top management of this company, that highlighted enormous bribes, plunder of tens (or hundreds) million dollars, fraud, intimidation of witnesses, preventing to justice, violation of laws on free elections, bribery of government officials and the whole governments of a number of the countries, etc. Let"s stress that all the unprecedented scandals and crimes started and continued when Gwyn Morgan was the head of SNC-Lavalin"s head office, and that before Morgan nothing similar ever occurred. And here, the head of this company, which was at the center of the most notorious corporate scandals, becomes, due to Harper"s regime support, the most "dear" and important man in Canada.


Just the list of the state awards received by Gwyn Morgan, and his titles are astonishing: Canada's Outstanding CEO (2005); Fellow of the Canadian Academy of Engineering (FCAE) (2005); recipient of the Canadian Business Leader Award from the University of Alberta; Ivey Business Leader Award from the University of Western Ontario; the Honorable Colonel of the Canadian Air Force; twice awarded the Honorary Degrees and inductee to the Alberta Business Hall of Fame.


As well as Dr. Arthur Porter, Dr. Sejean, Dr. Morris, Dr. Sprull, Dr. John Patrick Rowen, and Dr. Steven Gershkovich (and a number of other medical and semi-medical workers, mentioned in my chronicle (in my medical saga), Gwyn Morgan always acted in the shadow of the open conflict of interests, but this troubled no one on the Canadian Olympus. Holding all above-listed posts and positions, and receiving all these regalia, he remained all the time Harper's and the Prime minister of British Columbia from Christy Clark"s (Liberal party) adviser. If the conflict of interest would be taken in consideration, when Arthur Porter, Ben Aissa, Gwyn Morgan, Robert Cox, and many other high-ranking officials were appointed, no roguish and corruption schemes and other crimes would happen so often.


Certainly, Harper gave Gwyn Morgan the green light not for his beautiful eyes. Morgan was his debtor, and Harper was Morgan"s debtor as well, because without the political organizations representing interests of foreign predators, whose interests are cardinally opposite to the interests of Canada, and without such people as Morgan, Harper would never come to power. And when everything possible was squeezed out of his governments in the interests of these foreign predators, they stopped their support in 2015, and Harper lost his seat in the highest country"s office. Canada received a brake to recover the breath, but - on the next elections - if conservatives (or new democrats; or liberals) will promise to sell Canada even cheaper - they will win.


Judging by Gvin Morgan's own statements: a rigid, cruel man, hater of the nature and everything associated with the environmental protection, was behind these statements; a hater of ordinary workers, immigrants, and refugees. And, because this person was the face of Harper"s regime, and was remaining so long an adviser and close friend of Harper, it is possible to associate him with the Harper"s regime in general...


It was Morgan, who sold a part of Encana to China, together with the Canadian interests in this area.


No wonder that the justice never reached Morgan, because he is one of Olympic gods that are positioned above all the governments and above all the laws. If he would be arrested, he would end like Porter, or like other important witnesses that died or were murdered before an eventual court hearing. If Porter would not die "from cancer", he would die from something else, or would "commit a suicide". And those, who got under the press of Canadian and non-Canadian justice: they are obviously just the whipping boys or just small scapegoats, doomed to be responsible for the crimes of others.


It is possible to consider that nobody was brought to justice, until next persons will not be forced to answer the burning questions:


1. Gwyn Morgan (see above);


2. Diane Finley [together with her husband, Doug (Daniel) Finley, she was always involved in politics; she was assigned to be the controller of the department of Public Works (Public Works) - as the deputy of the Conservative party of Canada; Finlays provided the state contracts to SNC Lavalin in the heat of criminal cases and scandals around this firm, which became possible due to the changes in legislation, that permitted to deal with corporations during the processes of criminal cases; Diana Finlay was caught on illegal allocation of 1 million dollars for Toronto-based Jewish organization; (Daniel) Finlay's was involved in a scandal known under the name of Scandal of "In and Out" (2006), and (after the trial) was accused (together with I. Gerstein) in a number of machinations and violations during fundraising for Stephen Harper's election campaign; Doug Finlay was the manager of the election campaign of Stephen Harper himself; despite all Finlay's and Gerstein's dirty tricks - both were made senators, and remained the members of the Conservative party, and of the ruling council of the Harper"s regime];


3. Senator David Angus (see above);


4. Zhenia Byrne [daughter-in-law of Dan Kosick, she was in Stephen Harper's suite, among the closest to him personalities; then she became a secretary of another conservator with "the broken roof": Doug Ford];


5. Mikhail Mostyn [he stood in 2004 and 2006 as a candidate from Conservative party for York Centre (2 times lost); also was a candidate from conservatives in 2011 (and lost again); at the same time Mostyn held a post of the Director of the Relations with the Government in the Bnei Brith organization (an obvious conflict of interests); later he was designated as a chief of pan-Canadian Bnei Brith; Mostyn also participated in the Canadian Coalition of Democracies, which, "strangely enough", "beats out" grants and monetary help for the countries where there is a support of Islamophobia, anti-Christian or anti-Buddhist movement (most actively the influential members of Canadian Coalition of Democracies lobby help for India and Israel); this organization ardently denies that moved by a political motivation, and also denies that connected to Canadian and other governments, but CCD was created by the cabinet"s of Conservative party of Canada 2 ministers, and CCD"s Executive Director is the former coordinator of the Conservative party; also involved in CCD"s activity: Peter Kent, just another person with "the double face" of Bnei Brith and Conservative party and Tony Clement, an important functionary of the Canadian political establishment)];


6. Linda Frum [the deputy of the Canadian parliament from Conservative party; she cooperates with Bnei Brith in all campaigns aimed to blacken the dissidents, whose views irritate the Bnei Brith. As soon as Bnei Brith slings mud at any intellectual or politician, right there Linda Frum (one of the most influential figures among conservatives) picks up the relay race; her assistant in the smear campaigns is often the above mentioned Peter Kent.]


7. And Daniel Kosick (Kozik) [Danya (Dan) (Daniel) Kozik worked with Dina Finlay in 2010-2013 (Jannie Byrne - his daughter-in-law), and was caught red-handed when broke rules of the corporate ethics, in team with Flagship Solutions, which is specializing on "strategic acquisitions"].


8. Senator Hugh Segal [see below].


Such personalities as Mikhail Mostyn, D. Kenney, Rhone Ambroz, senators Hugh Segal and David Angus, and others: are people with "double faces" and "double loyalty". (Or even triple loyalty). They stand by one leg in the couloirs of Canadian political parties, but with their other leg they support themselves in the couloirs of the foreign governments, B'nai B'rith, or other extremist organizations, and in the milieu of dozens of foreign secret services.


SNC-Lavalin's scandals are only the top of an iceberg, which was slightly opened to general public; they go so deeply to "underwater" part of untidiness of all North American and world politics that conduct to many old conflicts and to sores, which are not a matter of discussion, including centuries-old conflict between English and French Canada.


Any interested in politics native of Quebec with the French roots, will tell you that an overwhelming part of the most influential political figures in The Conservative Party of Canada with Anglo-American roots (as well as a smaller, but, still, a major part of the Liberals) treat everything French unfriendly, and - especially without big love - treat the French province of Quebec.


They care for English provinces more, disregarding Quebec, French and French culture.


Moreover, all federal parties (in exception of Bloc Québécois) already almost hate the French, seek to close the French schools and the universities, clubs and public organizations at least outside Quebec (in other Canadian provinces).


The same wave of "love" emanate Quebec political leaders towards all English; they adopt such familiar (especially in the 1930-s - 1940-s in Europe) methods as cultural genocide, racism, discrimination, and elimination of human rights and privacy, in their fight against English language and "non-Quebec" identity.


As well as inter-provincial competition, the fight between the political parties is not aligned with ethics and trust: all of them are knee-deep in corruption and fraud.


This is reflected in the state of the health care system, which is suffering from the actions of political, corporative, and financial sharks.


Both leading parties - Liberals and Conservatives - were equally corrupted by SNC-Lavalin operatives, with only one difference - that the conservatives managed to cover up their involvement a bit better.


That's why I'll concentrate more on Conservatives' scandalous involvement.


In 2011, Harper regime handed over the commercial division of the state company AECL (Atomic Energy of Canada, Limited) (AECL's CANDU Division) to the private company SNC-Lavalin for a real cut-rate (15 million CA dollars; the price of some exclusive mansions in Canada), but with a sight to put this major Canadian technological branch under control of Great Britain and USA, as happened a bit later, when, on the basis of AECL and with the help SNC-Lavalin, the Harper regime "started" CNL (Canadian Nuclear Laboratories, Limited), having divided the control over this enterprise between SNC-Lavalin, USA and Great Britain. A "nuclear branch" of Candu Energy Inc. was also opened for marketing and design, and the delivery of CANDU reactors. Harper sold AECL to Lavalin for $15 millions, but the real estimated value of AECL was worth $1.1 billion (including land, buildings and devices). In the same time, the subsidies that the conservative government of Stephen Harper gave SNC-Lavalin (taken from the federal taxpayers during a number of years) have reached an astronomical sum of $17 billion.


When Harper awarded AECL with a national license to build new nuclear reactors (1-st such license in 30 years), RCMP was investigating SNC-Lavalin for the bribes in Muammar Gaddafi"s Libya, and for many other crimes, committed in Canada and abroad, which included bribery, bribery payments to public officials, fraud, etc. After selling AECL to SNC-Lavalin for an anecdotal reduced price, Harper started subsidizing atomic projects of this company, awarding Lavalin with $75 million CA (2011). So, the taxpayers have paid $60 million for privatization of the state company AECL, plus $4.5 billion value of liabilities. Formally, the $75 million aimed to help the company go on with the project of Advanced CANDU Reactor (ACR), which existed only on paper, and was never surfaced as a real device.


In 2014, shortly before the fall of the conservative government, Harper regime has charged SNC-Lavalin and its US-UK corporate partners to administer $8 billion nuclear waste liabilities (owned by the federal government) of 2 closed nuclear reactors in Ontario and Manitoba, bounding the partners by a directive to cut those liabilities in record time, and with the lowest costs. So, the most of the waste ended up beside 3 water basins: Lake Ontario (Port Hope), Ottawa River (bank of the Chalk River), and near Pinawa (Whiteshell Nuclear Research Establishment, Manitoba).


On Harper administrative order, the corporate triumvirate US-UK-Canada did not dismantle the maximally radioactive remains of those 2 reactors, did not took away the radioactive trash to a safe location (as was originally intended), but just deposited it to the sub-basement of the reactor"s building, downpouring cheap and quickly drying cement on the top. In other words, they turned these 2 sites into 2 clones of the worse version of Chernobyl"s sarcophagus, next to the Winnipeg and Ottawa Rivers. And, while terms of dissolution of some radioactive elements - are thousands of years, these concrete radioactive structures can survive maybe 100 years or even less. It is possible that - after 30-40 years from now - they will begin to collapse.


The most dangerous outcome is when the radioactive waste gets into a river. Regarding unpredictable natural disasters due to the climate change, a radioactive catastrophe of Chernobyl magnitude can happen at above named 3 sites at any moment.


One of SNC-Lavalin"s partners, United States-based Starcore Nuclear Ltd. of Maryland, is still lobbying the Conservators to subsidy the development of another small (nuclear) modular reactor (SMR), submitting a $150-million proposal. However, the last similar reactor, the Slowpoke, functioned relatively short time, and Slowpoke"s radioactive ruins are left on site. But this will not stop the government, if another Stephen Harper will come to power.


While SNC-Lavalin"s CEO Gwym Morgan was in charge (among other things) of the nuclear reactors program, Harper made him the commissioner of his newly created Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (CNSC), violating all norms of ethics and creating another pattern of the conflict of interests.


In June 2014, SNC-Lavalin bought the Irish construction giant of Kentz for 2 billion dollars. Since 2005, the operation of SNC-Lavalin in Asia and Africa (Madagascar, Bangladesh, India, Libya, Morocco, etc.) remind in general the operations of Israeli companies: same style, same aggressive manner, same choice of countries.


As well as the Liberal party of Canada, the conservatives received considerable sums, and also help from SNC-Lavalin, and, the most surprising fact, is that the links between SNC-Lavalin with the liberals continued to prosper during Harper era!


It is known from well informed sources that the Prime minister of Canada, Stephen Harper, personally, carried on confidential negotiations with the General Prosecutor of Canada to hush up the swindles of SNC-Lavalin and to screen the criminals. Before the scandal erupted around Mr. Justin Trudeau's similar efforts, I found it out from the same well-informed sources, and described it in one of my articles.


However, in our modern world, where everything is based on lie and deception since the beginning of the 20-th century AC, Canadian leaders at least try to brake through this "lie conspiracy". Comparing to other world leaders, even such Canadian politicians as Stephen Harper, who inflicted an unrepeatable damage to the reputation of the Conservative Party of Canada, are more honest and resolute in their efforts to do something good. It is not Canadian, but Great Britten's "innovation", which made possible to let the corporations sneaking from justice via a new hole in the justice system by a criminal "deal". Could something be different in Canada, after England passed this new law about the prevailing of so-called "economic interests" over the criminal justice (the law known as DPA)? Canada - as the British dominion (colony) - automatically had to submit to the British shift, and was compelled to apply the same law volens-nolens, even if it was not yet accepted de facto. The similar DPA law has been adopted in USA on the same basis, which eliminated any eventual opposition to such practices in North America.


The SNC-Lavalin"s scandalous records became so notorious not because this firm did something more outraged then other corporations, and not because Canada is to blame, but because Switzerland, Belgium, and Canada (countries, which have initiated all primary investigations) - are more transparent and pluralistic than other countries, where even the minimal information about corporate crimes would be muffled, suppressed, and all crimes would be covered up from the very beginning. In other countries, corporations are doing more sinister crimes, on much wider scale, and of incomparable gravity. And the forces, interested in not to dig dipper into Lavalin"s case, are not only domestic, but act on the global arena.


CHAPTER 5.


SNC-Lavalin affairs go so deeply in the depths of (hidden from the general public) dishonest games of rivalry between 4 largest world financial institutions - World Bank in Washington, Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank in Beijing, The International Monetary Fund in Europe, and African Development Bank Group for Africa, - that they touch the very essence of the serious political, financial and economic diseases of the modern world.


This case also gives us an idea about a serious crises of the ideologies of today"s Left and Right...


Harper came to the power after Martin and Ignatyev not least because he - first - made a row of unscrupulous, doubtful manipulations, breaking the principles of democratic elections, and - secondly - because, probably, went to his election campaign inflow of larger unscrupulous injections (than the Liberals), which, however, managed to be hidden and coded more thinly. Only recently became to filter the facts that, for example, "SNC-Lavalin staff donated 15 K $ to Conservative nominee". Such facts began to emerge after scandalous messages about injections in an election campaign of liberals. Well, and, certainly, Harper's support, as it is possible to assume, arrived in much bigger scales from other sources, first of all - from "public", and actually predatory political organizations, besides, connected with Conservative party the people participating and in it, and in these organizations at the same time.


Neo-liberals and neo-conservatives are complimentary cubes from the same design. They both take wealth and social security from majority's public pocket - and put them into the pocket of minority (the financial and corporate elite).


The conservatives made the major corporate tax cuts, but the liberals made such taxes low for a long time. Both of them are hypocritically closing their eyes to the fact that the deficit, that, allegedly, the liberals have created, and that, allegedly, was the child of the excessive social spending, is actually a product of their policies that increase social inequality and growing privileges.


For example, doubled and tripled need in social housing, and their rising cost are the products of the growing housing prices, when a working family can not afford renting ANY apartment not only in Toronto and Vancouver, but already in Montreal and other cities around Canada. Thus, the greater need in the social programs and their cost, and the burden for the national budget, and the mounting deficit: all this is the product of enrichment of some, and pauperizations of all others.


When very essential information about political leaders disappear, like if some anonymous forces sealed a Pandora box (while the same shadowed forces dig out every tiny detail about their rivals); or when a bus collides with PM Justin Trudeau"s electoral plane (just like was with his father"s, P.-E. Trudeau), and Mr. Trudeau almost disappears after this incident, being absent from all planned events; or when a conservative leader (who, being almost a persona incognito, was picked up by the Conservatives only in 2017) is hiding any information about his previous life, his real personality, and his true views and intentions: this is VERY, VERY SCARY. And - when NDP's MP's and candidates, and some other politicians blame PERSONALLY Mr. Trudeau for every injustice, death, or incident in Canada: they actually do it on behalf of the orchestrated by the left and right extremists personal bullying, and this is very frightening for everyone, who knows the history of European 1930-s too well. (The same pattern has surfaced in the neighboring country, just directed at the conservative (republican) leader). A ruler, who was scared for death, becomes a puppet in shadowy forces' hands, and the whole state machine is transformed into a dinosaur, whose only purpose is to eat people.


In the midst of the present global madness and chaos, only the North European states and Iceland was keeping a certain degree of sanity, and Canada was going right after them. Comparing to the events in other parts of the globe, Canada was still one of the best countries, and this would be hardly possible, if the Conservatives would act irresponsibly. However, after 2017, a Great Shift placed Canada into the category of other, "ordinary" states, pulling it into the vortex of the global disaster.


McGill University in Montreal is a generator of very positive and inspirational things. During its history, this university attained many great achievements. However, in our post-humanism era it equally became a playground and a laboratory for a bunch of "bad guys", who stage inhuman social, psychiatric, robotic, oppressive, military, and technological experiments for enslaving people, waging wars, turning human beings into monsters, robots, and marionettes.


And, first of all, there are close links between this university - and the sinister corporate projects.


This explains and illustrates Porter's swindle as well. What communication between these corporate and political organizations - and McGill University? Between them - and Porter's swindle? Between McGill University - and SNC-Lavalin? Between Dr. Porter - and Dr. Cox?


Let's not stop on what threads connected Robert Cox Sr. and Robert Cox Jr. with Dr. Arthur Porter and Jeremy Morris.


Let's give the basic attention to the identity of Cox Sr. - and to the main vectors of his activity.


Robert Cox is a well-known pedant, formalist, and man for whom the importance of his own person means much. His attacks on the mayor of the town of St. Lazare (2012 - 2015) (where Cox lived, and where - in 2009 - he nominated his own candidature in the District 3 for the municipal party of Paul Carzoli's Union St. Lazare Unified Party) - are widely known.


Robert Grimaudo, the mayor of St. Lazar, showed an initiative, rare in our times, of protection and preservation of the forest area, but Cox, to please his own pedantry and pettifogging, nearly "killed" this initiative under the pretext of just petty, formal catches.


Legends were circulated in both Concordia and McGill Universities at the time about Robert Cox's roughness, clamorousness, vindictiveness, hypertrophied self-esteem, and authoritativeness.


When I received the 1-st letter from Robert Cox in 2015, and took an interest at one recent student of McGill University what people are speaking about Mr. Cox, that later uploaded on my flash card a link to a forum where students discussed their professors.


There were expressed such opinions on Cox:


This professor is not for the faint heart! At first he appears as being abrasive, and blunt...


Bob has a big personality, and he's very sarcastic. He is one of those people you either hate or

love.


His teaching style (...) at first odd, and off the topic.


What I personally do not like is this professor's politics and as a result a sometimes one sided

viewpoint which put off my experience.


AVOID! (unless you like having your GPA go down)


he does not let you ask any questions about what will be on the exams. verrrrrry anal about

people blurting out answer, MUST raise your hand or he will bite your head off


Besides the teaching activity at McGill and Concordia (where he read a course of "medical law", Civil, International, Transport, Sea, and Commercial law), Robert Cox held posts of legal adviser for McGill University Health Center (MUHC; uniting nearly 10 huge hospitals); responsible on lawsuits for psychiatric procedures and inquiries on access to information; one of the founders of PESMM group; etc.


It is easy to notice that, as well as in case of Arthur Porter, in Robert Cox's case, combination of diverse activities in itself and numerous posts comprised literally the shouting conflict of interests. This is the source of amazing lawlessness and impunity of many criminals.


My consultants claimed that - in his lectures - professor Cox put interests of corporations, public institutions and doctors above (individual) so-called "human rights", civil rights, democratic freedoms and even above the law and order. Especially aggressively and irreconcilably, according to them, professor Cox was "tuned" in relation to psychiatrists' patients and their families, and also to dissidents, whom he tried to blacken by means of psychiatric insinuations, or to hide them in mental hospitals.


It was said that professor Cox regarded "as angels" even such war criminals as professor Cameron and his accomplices (successors of the fascist experiments under the aegis of CIA); and the victims of criminal experiments, and those, who exposed war criminals, he condemned with a special rage.


I do not know what of his lectures my informants meant, but one of them - "Law in Mind: A Crash Course in Psychiatric Law (March, 2013)" - had in its subtitle: "challenges of balancing individual rights and professional responsibilities, and evolution of psychiatric law".


This information on Robert Kos is confirmed by an article in THE GAZETTE (12.14.2011) - "Secret Society: Health data still have gaps". The meaning of this article (and other similar articles) comes down to the fact that, in defiance of the Canadian Federal, Quebec and International laws, McGill University's hospitals' network blocks any access to common medical data, as well as blocks the access to their personal medical data for patients.


Public organizations, individuals, neither mass media, nor even the Minister of Health Yves Bolduc could not force this university "to declassify" McGill's secret data and to open access to medical data for patients and for bodies of supervision.


And McGill hospitals' network constitute 1 third of all medical institutions in Montreal.


Some of McGill's medical institutions even refused to obey to the order of the Minister of Health - refusing to open an access to ANY data at all.


Even the number of deaths in the hospitals - is a "secret".


The law known as "Bill 113" (accepted in 2002), which made obligatory a compulsory opening of access to data, came into effect in vain.


"Despite the legal obligation to reveal errors, mishaps and near-misses to families and patients, one-third of the hospitals failed to tell victims of errors incurred during care" - writes the newspaper.


Data on infections in these "lawless" hospitals, in general, not registered anywhere, including the data about the quantity of cases of infection of Clostridium difficile.


The policy of English hospitals affiliated with McGill - and the policy of French hospitals: strikingly differs.


If - English McGill University Health Centre responded to the request of The Gazette with a sharp refusal, - than the French Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital published everything, even the detailed facts and data requested by The Gazette.


Medical lawyers claim that only public jurisdiction and publicity are capable to cure the disease of Canadian health care system. About 24 thousand Canadians die annually due to medical errors, which could be prevented, the newspaper underlines (according to data of the research conducted by the researcher from University of Toronto, Ross Baker).


Who most zealously blocked access to information on medical errors?


Certainly, the representative of MUHC - Dr. Robert Cox! He said that hospitals' data about the relevant commissions (risk management committees) - "are confidential". "Consequently, I have no other alternative but to deny your request", - he said The Gazette, in spite of the fact that Quebec laws "required to make them public in the interests of patient safety".


Contrary to it, French hospitals (and, in particular, hospitals, affiliated with l"Université de Montréal), opened access to all data.


"There is no juridical or legal justification not to reveal for publicity the statistical data on this question - if you have nothing to hide", - said Paul Brunet, the head of the group of the rights of patients - "Conseil pour la protection des malades". "I am simply struck. I cannot believe that it is their general mutual responsibility of their corporate position".


"The report of the prosecutor on investigation of Ivan Todorov's (83) death after three months spent by him in Queen Victoria Hospital exposed chronic malnutrition, infection, metabolic complications and gradual organs' failure. They never reported about it to his family".


In 8 years after the approval of Bill 113 by the government of Quebec, which obliges hospitals to tell patients immediately about "any incident or accident - as soon as it becomes known", English hospitals not only do not do it, but, on the contrary, use any tricks and methods to block such information.


However, another Robert Cox - Robert Cox junior, also exists, or, more precisely - Cox Jr.


Most likely, he is a grandson of Robert Cox Sr. Him, but not Cox Sr., I mentioned, when expressed an opinion that those, who could stand behind Dr. Morris, could to ask or force one of such people as Robert Cox, to destroy the results of my analysis of March 2-3, 2015.


Doctor Brian Morris - is the founder and the head of doctordirect.com company, with the web website of the same name, connected online with huge number of Montreal doctors and - indirectly - with Internet portals of Montreal hospitals. Indirectly (or even directly) this website and the doctordirect.com company is crossed with the Intelerad and MUHC database (McGill University Health Centre (MUHC), and also, is not excluded, l'université de Montréal.


The position of Dr. Morris gave him an opportunity to trace all my visits to other doctors, and probably to surveil all my medical procedures. Potentially, Dr. Morris - in principle - had an opportunity (through the specialists-technicians connected with his business and with other types of his wide activity) to destroy the result of mine analysis even without the assistance of professor Robert Cox or his (most likely) grandson Robert Cox Junior.


DoctorDirect.com is not only a corporate web website, but also computer and web program (web application software), developed together with Microsoft.net framework (asp.net C#), potentially having links with Microsoft corporation and with the intelligence agencies, like special services of USA and Israel.


Doctor Morris also a member of CMA, QMA, CUA, QUA, EUA, CMPA, FMSQ, CUOG associations, and SIU. He is Fellow of the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada.


He is a consultant of the Commission on Health and Safety of Work (Commission de la Sante et de la Sécurité du Travail (CSST) and McCarthy Tetreault law firm.


Fomenting to a grotesque his gaudy conflict of interests, Dr. Morris concentrated a considerable power and influence in his hands.


This is his real ("second") calling: power and influence, and medical profession is only the way to acquire them.


But more important than Dr. Morris himself, whatever knowledgeable doctor and good surgeon he was, his DoctorsDirect.com company, which became an important component of Montreal medical community.


Even more important - is a role of Dr. Morris as one of the elements of a rigid structure of connections and interdependences - built into a wider picture, and any threat of a scandal linked to them, automatically receives an alarm signal in the system of these structures.


Thus, the question of his personal role in the confiscation my ill-fated analysis - is not even so important.


All of us are mortal and vulnerable, and none of us are insured from diseases.


So, indispositions and illnesses: are an Achilles' heel of everyone, even the richest people, even most imperious political figures.


And medicine and medical doctors: it is an armor covering this Achilles' heel, or a poisoned arrow aimed into this most vulnerable area.


Therefore, dishonest doctors and administrators from medicine, who initially went to a bargain with their conscience: they are a treasure-discovery for foreign intelligence agencies, diversionary divisions of foreign powers, and a convenient tool for all foreign states for manipulations with Canadian policy and Canadian politicians, and also for neutralization or physical elimination of all objectionable (to them) persons.


Consequently, even in such a relatively humane country, as Canada till 2016-2017, governments of the most ominous countries, secret and semi-secret societies, terrorists and organized crime, corruption and dishonest business, using immorality of the immoral health workers, conduct their own game incompatible with any ethics and precepts of law within a civilized society, inconsistent with the interests of Canada and its citizens.


In the same time, some medics and close circles of doctors play their own game for the sake of power and influence, and inappropriate earnings, and - ahead of this cohort - are such grabbers - obsessed with the thirst of power (and with their own egoism) - as Arthur Porter and Robert Cox Sr.


As for Robert Cox Jr., in the middle and in the end of 1990-s, CIO Robert Cox was one of the founders (together with Randall Oka (president and the CEO), CTO Chris Henri, and Rick Rubin (Rubin was the chief engineer) of Intelerad company, which was developing large PACS technologies, digital techniques and formats of medical pictures (x-ray, ultrasonography, and other), and registration-maintenance of databases for the universities and state hospitals.


Officially, the Intelerad company was opened in Montreal in January, 2000, and was served by only 5 colleagues. But soon it passed into the private sector, with branches in USA, England and Oceania, and, since this moment, a conflict of interests starts: because - potentially - foreign states and their intelligence agencies theoretically got an unlimited access to patients' personal data accumulated in public medical institutions in Canada (hospitals, policlinics, laboratories, radiologies, etc.).


Through this company, such USA organizations as U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs", or National Teleradiology Program - received an opportunity of influencing Canadian institutions, got a theoretical access to databases, etc.


A bigger conflict of interests arises, when the same people, such as Robert Cox Jr., work for private companies (such as Intelerad), and, at the same time, hold large posts in such academic state institutions as network of hospitals of McGill University Health Centre MUHC and l'université de Montréal.


Thus, my complaint not accidentally fell into Robert Cox Sr. hands: because he was at that time professor of political sciences, expert on "psychiatric precepts of law" (Medical Legal Psychiatric Issues), and repeatedly toured with lectures, in which brought up the questions of the "protection" of medical institutions from claims-lawsuits of patients, whose rights were violated in the area of "psychiatry".


For years, he played a role of a chain dog - guarding information about an outrage that takes place behind the walls of medical institutions, to be sure that not even prosecutor's office, nor police investigators, neither court, nor mass media, nor supervisory authorities, nor victims of the medical crimes and their lawyers - will not approach this data.


Passing over my "case" to him, and to those people, who made up his "team", the interested persons thereby already employed a corporate lawyer, a judge and executioner in one form - in spite of the fact that I promised not to give the course to this case and not to address to lawyers (and kept the promise).


Robert Cox was also repeatedly characterized as fanatical and pedantic defender of Quebec health care system as "the best" "in the world".


However, while my assessment of this system does not differ much from his assessment, I more than once emphasized that this system ceased to work normally because of the predatory privatization and sabotage by people interested only in profit.


Therefore, new, additional measures are necessary for it protection.


However, Robert Cox proved to be a blind adherent of the existing system of public medical care (at least - in his communication with people), and everyone, who did not agree with him, or specified on the fact that the aggressive privatization actually strangled this perfect Quebec model, which (because of commercialization) already stopped to work: became his enemy.


One of his students told about Cox so: "Cox frequently strayed off topic. He's blatantly biased against any critics of the current health care system, effectively discouraging any real critical thinking in his students".


I was hinted (referred) to several actions, in which - as it was approved, - participated both Cox Senior and Cox Junior; for example, on May 31, 2013: MUHC Psychiatry Grand Rounds - Medical Legal Psychiatric Issues. We already know - what role could play here the lawyer and chain dog of the protection of psychiatrists' incompetence - Dr. Robert Cox Sr.


Robert Cox Jr. participated in this action as the Chief Information Officer at Intelerad Medical Systems.


It is possible to assume that Robert Cox Jr. has an official access to the whole united database of McGill medical institutions, to all her connections online with all doctors and medical institutions, including the data on the results of laboratory analyses.


But also Robert Cox Sr. - as a chain dog, protecting the secrecy of the entire base of medical data, could not but have an access to any information, including these laboratory analyses.


Robert Cox Jr. completed the course of Electrical/Computer Engineering at McGill University in 1990 - 1995; prior to university, he got diploma of Red River College (1979 - 1980) in Electrical Engineering Technology.


Nothing is known to me about the situation with morality at Robert Cox Jr.


Therefore, I do not know whether he could - theoretically - to be an accomplice of a destruction of medical data; but Robert Cox Sr.: this was a person who, apparently, was capable of such actions.


It is not so important - Dr. Morris himself, or those, who stood behind him: but whether they could allow that - literally few days after my fax (in which I reproached Dr. Morris that the refusal of antibiotics, of the direction on laboratory analyses, and on diagnostic procedures (such as ultrasound), provoked not only complications of acute urological infection, but much more serious consequences) - a laboratory test confirmed an infection (especially that not Dr. Morris, but another doctor administrated this analysis)?


The fact that not he - Dr. Morris, - but Dr. Rohan referred me to this analysis, undoubtedly, was for Dr. Morris an additional sensitive factor.


Dr. Morris does not like to tell about himself even to colleagues, with whom he is more often communicating, to employees, or friends. He hides all: his origins, birthplace, studies and details of his early working career. While it is well known about any other doctor - where he worked before, where he studied, etc. - nothing is known about doctor Morris.


From where he came to St.-Mary's hospital; where he worked before, etc.: everything is covered with a gloom. Modesty or secrecy, or he has what to conceal, or he has a lot of enemies?


Very few people know that he spent some time on Bahamas and in England, then - at first - he studied at McGill, where (in 1970) received a bachelor's degree (it is unknown - on what specialty), and was involved in some program at Université de Montréal.


England, Bahamas, and Reims: are places of Dr. Morris's potential crossovers with Dr. Jeremiah Morris and Dr. Arthur Porter. And Reims is a center of a certain world-wide known cult.


Then he, having spent some time in England, studied at the university in Reims (France) (Université de Reims), where - in 1977 - received the Doctor's degree (it is unknown, in what area).


Why he, an English-speaking person, went to study in France?


Why, having graduated from the Université de McGill in Montréal (1970), trained in faraway Memorial University Hospital, in English province of Newfoundland, and, only after that, was trained in "urology", and not in the same hospital, but directly in McGill University?


After that, he consulted patients in Queen Elizabeth Hospital, and - from there - came to St.-Mary"s Hospital as the doctor, simultaneously having opened his private office in the Westmount Medical Building (where I, too, visited him), in the most pompous municipality of Montreal where the richest people live.


He opened this firm (medical office) in 2005.


The same year, Dr. Morris opened an additional business company: DoctorDirect.com.


It is a special web service for patients' registration in Montreal on receptions to doctors, for cataloging visits to doctors, and for entering of records into the database.


At the same time, Dr. Morris - as it was told above - became a member of many associations: CMA, QMA, CUA, QUA, EUA, CMPA, FMSQ, CUOG, and SIU. It is a member Royal College of Doctors and Surgeons of Canada, consultant of Commission on Security of work (CSST), and private law firm McCarthy Tetreault.


His DoctorDirect.com company has the status of corporation. Its name since 2016: 6466575 CANADA INC. It is open since October 24, 2005, and carried such earlier names: BGMM Medical Inc. (from 2006-11-14 to 2007-11-23), DOCTORDIRECT.COM INC. (from 2007-12-06 to 2016-01-18). An interesting coincidence: Dr. Morris changed the name of this company just before the most tragic period of my urological drama, which entered into its heaviest phase on his personal fault.


One more interesting fact: his corporation is a joint-stock company. According to my data, the number of its members: is about 40 people. They must be very rich, and, the main thing, very influential people.


One more curious fact: in 2015, the same year, when our relations with him have drastically changed for the worse (when my communications with him were poisoned by something external), Dr. Morris delayed the registration of his DoctorDirect.com company, letting the registration to expire.


Besides this - another extremely curious thing: Dr. Morris registered the corporation 6466575 CANADA INC. to address 5025 SHERBROOKE W. OFFICE 320 MONTREAL QC H4A 1S9, Canada.


But this is the address of his medical office!


Unless is it not a conflict of interests?


In my opinion: yes.


I told about this fact to several acquaintances: they consider, too, that it is a conflict of interests. Doctor Morris justified it by the "need to check the functionality and effectiveness" of this system in the conditions of his own medical office in Westmount (Western Montreal), but, unless it would not be more correct to check - how this system works - in a public, independent from private business and impartial medical office?


Certainly, as after testing was finished, registration all the same and remained to the same address... (Dots).


However, in the contacts' papers, another address is given (his home address?).


DoctorDirect.com is a service, which is based on Network (Internet) communications, serving doctors and patients, for making an appointment to doctors online easier, and for registration of visits to doctors and other data.


At the same time, it is and a web application, developed together with Microsoft.net (asp.net C#).


This service also allows patients to find a new doctor, who agrees to accept new patients.


Besides all above mentioned, this system works in a direct sheaf with the Ministry of Health of Quebec, allowing to carry out a 100 percent governmental covering, for example, visits of those patients, which have no private insurance, accepting the universal public medical insurance of the RAMQ plastic card, connected with the billing system of DoctorDirect.com.


However, the symbiosis of this private company with the system of the state public medical care is not limited by this, and includes many other elements and components.


So, the perfect system of public health care of Quebec becomes more and more corrupted, being exposed more and more broadly and deeply to the penetrating aggressive privatization, allowing to the levers of its management and functioning private firms, which use these levers (exactly as they use health issues and lives of millions of people) for their own predatory interests.


In this regard, Dr. Morris, who was refusing to me vital analyses only because they "cost much" - though he did not pay even a cent from his pocket: is a symbol of how far the moral and ethical decomposition advanced, how drastically advanced medical, social, political, and all other norms' corruption even in such still rather human (one of the last!) country, as Canada till 2017.


In those crimes, which were committed against my health in 2014 - 2016, Dr. Morris's negative role could be shared with the role of the shadow figures of DoctorDirect management and shareholders, who could play a significant role in the dramatic - for me - events, because a possible scandal around Dr. Bryan Morris would affect also their enterprise as well.


As well as many other private and state-owned firms and organizations, DoctorDirect uses the software of EMR of KinLogix. But, unlike others corporations, DoctorDirect, according to MY information, is a PARTNER of this firm, a subsidiary of TELUS corporation.


What does it mean?


It means that not only a little piranha got access to personal data of millions of Quebecers, but also a huge shark hiding behind her shadow.


On the one hand, Telus - formally (but not completely!) - is a state Canadian company, which is based in Vancouver (province of British Columbia) ...


This telecommunication giant is specializing in such services as Internet, phone, mobile phone, video, cable TV, etc. Mobil Telus provides services for mobile phones on the basis of HSPA and LTE networks. In Alberta Telus also acts as local airline.


A company, which concentrated in its hands so (too) much access to private life and personal data of Canadian citizens, received in addition also an access to all integrated medical data, and it is not a joke any more. And, in spite of the fact that TELUS - on "paper" - seemingly a "state" company, the fact in itself that a telecommunication giant was allowed to personal confidential medical files of Quebecers, is comparably to allowing of a fox to the hen house.


But, in reality, Telus is not a "state" corporation. The status of this company is very much "slippery", "soap", and "ambiguous".


I asked questions to experts more than once on the status of those or other private and state companies, and many of them found it difficult to call Telus a "state" company, and some even insisted that Telus is a private company!


This company - at first - was based in Edmonton (Alberta; the Canadian province with the most unscrupulous business traditions), before merging with BCTel (1999), and it was created in 1990 by the government of the Province of Alberta under the name of Telus Corporation (holding company), but - in 1995 - was bought by Edmonton Telephones Corporation (Ad Tel) from the city of Edmonton.


In 1998, there was a merge of Telus and BCTel companies (completed in 1999); the name of the company became Telus Corporation, and the company moved to Vancouver.


This merge made it the second largest telecommunication company of Canada.


During this period (and, maybe, to this day) firms, finance, and intelligence agencies from USA took part in Telus, and, in particular, the ominous telecommunication firm Verizon, in the time, created on basis of Israeli Verint company, and connected to Israeli intelligence and counterintelligence.


Verizon had a considerable share in Telus, not less than 20.5 percent.


And, though the American firm Verizon Communications (connected with Israeli and American special services), somewhere in 2005 sold its share in Telus, the basic software, structural and administrative policy, marketing, and many other components, which were created and planned together with Verizon, did not get to anywhere from Telus.


My affected health and the worsening vision do not allow me to continue investigation of the current Telus links with Verint (Verizon), but my consultants, to whom I addressed, claim that this relation exist to the present day.


Verizon was also a subcontractor, which installed and maintained the whole system of video surveillance of Montreal's public transportation, which is an additional element of the horrific advance of inhuman technologies and violation of the most basic privacy norms.


Telus also used to launch ideologically and politically motivated illegal oppressive enforcement actions, and was also engaged in political censorship, when, for example, on July 25, 2005, blocked an access for Internet users to the website of the striking members of labor union.


Besides, there is a branch of Telus company under the name Telus International - the international corporation providing services of outsourcing, services to corporations and financial services, services in areas of consumer electronics and computer games, telecommunications, in the sphere of energy and industrial services, with contact centers in Philippines, England, Central America (Guatemala and El Salvador), and East to Europe (Bulgaria and Romania), etc.


Nevertheless, everything that I managed to learn very superficially about Telus, bears rather positive, than negative information, in comparison with 90 percent of others telecommunication giants.


Trying to be objective, I have to recognize that a minimal - limited - cooperation of the state with the private sector in medicine can help in overcoming the bureaucratization and laziness of the state public health care, but what occurs now: is a transformation of the public medical sector into an appendage of commercial sharks.


Nevertheless, even if we close eyes to some problematic aspects of Telus's access to personal medical files of Canadian citizens, there is one more, potentially dark side of its activity in this sphere: it is the KinLogix and its status.


As Telus's subsidiary, this firm, according to my consultants, represents a separate private company with not clear past and present.


So, for example, the famous world information and commercial reference book "Who is Who" informs that "Who is" record of Kinglogic public access to KingLogix ownership data is restricted" (made secret).


Even the name of this company is different in different sources: sometimes KingLogix, sometimes KingLogic.


I tried to guide myself - to inquire about it, but, whether the search engines block the access to me to everything connected with Kinglogic, whether this access is closed for all general public: it is not clear. And here, if this firm is really a "dark horse", with dark past and present, it is also an open gate for an infection.


KinLogix has integrated into its system of the software and service such an instrument as voice recognition and transcription of voice audio record into digital text.


This firm has developed a possibility of use of a personalized clinical dashboard creating a universal portrait of a patient. This tool can to be dangerous to privacy, especially - to the maintenance of the confidentiality of patients visiting doctors.


Recording and recognition of a voice of a patient can be used for any criminal, illegal and oppressive purposes.


As a separate organism of TELUS "in itself", a "kind of state within the state", and, perhaps, a PRIVATE firm in the business of telecommunications and smartphones service (and, it means, in the sphere of super-espionage and oppressive surveillance), KingLogix is connected to the most vitals elements of Quebec's national system of medical care: RAMQ - and RAMQ online services; Quebec Health Record (QHR) - Medication and Laboratory results domains; Regional laboratory interfaces - electronic reception and transfer of laboratory reports; OACIS Clinique Acute Care Information System, and so on.


But this system "stuck" also to the private sector:

1) Internet appointment scheduling;

2) Pharma space: electronic prescription renewals;

3) Private laboratory interfaces;

4) Billing system (Facturation.net).


The same system is used in all private and public medical clinics, in bases of computer data on laboratory analyses and medical scanning (X-rays, ultrasonography, computer tomography, etc.), and in the general electronic medical files of patients (Dossier Médical Électronique (PQADME).


And, if to keep in mind the systematic loss, falsification and submersion of the results of my medical exams and laboratory analyses, the fact that dozens of private and semi-private firms and companies became integrated into the public health care system, having access to patients' medical data, and participating in its registration, supervision, and storage, like KingLogix, which carries out "Electronic reception and transfer of laboratory and imaging results. Scanned document management module: laboratory and imaging results, referral reports, pre-existing clinical notes, archives and other documents" - instantly comes to mind.


And KingLogix was (and, maybe still is, in 2017) this firm that was connected to DoctorDirect.com, which head is Dr. Morris, and members of its Council of Directors are men of weight in the system of McGill medical institutions.


On the corridors of St.-Mary's Hospital, and on the sidelines of the Westmount medical center, I heard opinions on doctor Morris that - supposedly - he treats differently rich people and middle-income (or needy) patients, but I do not trust these rumors. More precisely, personal impressions of his actual or former patients sound quite plausibly, but, however, their conclusions do not seem convincing to me.


On the one hand, the pages of rating of doctors show cardinally different impressions, but, at the same time, enthusiastic or satisfactory responses are written (judging by style) - most likely - by rich people, and negative reviews - by the poor, or by representatives of growing poor intellectuals:


1) "My husband has been a patient of dr Morris for many years. Dr Morris sent Him for a

prostate biopsy May 31 2018. When we called after 3 weeks to get results, there was a message

saying the office is closed until November 5th! After leaving nine messages without A call back

we contacted our GP for Help. We then found out he had to sign a release form in order for our

Dr help us. The end result is after 10 weeks we were told last Thursday that he has prostate

cancer. I wonder how many other people are wondering around assuming they are fine, since

they have had no contact back from Dr Morris"s office. Imagine if we had waited until

November! At this point my rating would be less than zero" (hardly it is written

millionaire);


2) "Dr. Morris is warm and friendly. He is knowledgeable and caring as well. He has been

very helpful in dealing with my issues. I also appreciate his efficient and kind

secretary/receptionist, not to mention her good-looking twin sons. Perhaps you may have to

wait a bit to see Dr. Morris, but then you realize hat he gives his patients the ime they need,

which is what really counts." (it is written sure, firm and giving accessory

to rich elite style);


3) "I have been a patient of Dr. Morris for many years. He is warm, caring, and empathetic.

His diagnostic skills are amazing. I consider myself extremely fortunate to be the patient of such

an excellent urologist. I sincerely hope Dr. Morris does not retire for a very long time. Prior to

becoming a patient of Dr. Morris, I had consulted several well-known Montreal urologists,

without getting a proper diagnosis and treatment for my condition. Dr. Morris has helped me

tremendously. Thank-you." (too it is written by someone, belonging to elite; it

the message is also very important because represents the shouting contrast to that,

as doctor Morris "treated" - to be exact: crippled - me);


4) "I saw Dr Morris and had A cystoscope because I was passing blood. He found nothing

but ordered a CT scan. He then closed his office due to medical reasons and left no secretary to

ask questions about his return, another urologist to see, results, etc. I was lucky to quickly find

another Urologist who repeated the Cystoscope and found a malignant tumor and scheduled

me for surgery quickly. Three weeks after Dr. Morris closed his office the secretary called to

say she would give me an appointment. This is an inexcusable way to run a medical practice-to

say nothing of not seeing a tumor. Am waiting to see if he will even have the decency to call

me." (and it was written for certain not by the poor person, but also it faced with provocatively

negligent attitude of doctor Morris, on the verge of something is even more serious, than

negligence and indifference);


5) "He was my father s doctor. My father died shortly after Dr. Morris removed his kidney. This doctor monitered my father for over 20years for cysts kidney stones and various kidney

infections but ceased to diagnose him. My father s illness was eventually diognosed by his

family doctor.He had renal cell carcinoma. Dr. Morris treated my father.at the time a 75 year

old immigrant with total disrespect. I had words with him after my fathers death about leaving

renal cavity in.He shouted at me. I would never recommend this doctor to anyone. He is

rude and also incompetent. | Submitted August 30, 2016" (as from the comment

it is clear, whom was a patient whom doctor Morris actually killed of explanations not

it is required);


6) "Anyone who rates a doctor on other than medical knowledge and treatment is not

concentrating on the bottom line. I went to him because my doc referred me to him and he

treated me very well. My brother the surgeon, was also treated by him for cancer, so he did a

pretty aggressive initial assessment, and I am very satisfied with his attention to detail and

thorough knowledge." (from this message it becomes clear that doctor Morris is better

treats those whom to it sent on protection, and, especially, relatives medical

workers);


7) "Pretty busy doctor, but he takes the time to see you. If you're being appointed to him by

people working in the same building (like Dr. Rosenzweig, for example), he does seem

interested and can even contact the others if the information's not complete. He's not necessarily

gentle with you, and does not like prescribing things, but at least he can send you back to your

family doc the same day and you do get the results in pretty quickly." (this message

completely confirms the conclusions drawn from previous);

8) "He's very rude and unfrierndly"; 9) "Not very friendly. Treated like an assembly line.

Gave me incomplete information."; 10)"... no time to discuss medical results [4 minutes];

waited 45 minutes past appointment time."


My personal impression is the next: Dr. Morris - in principle - does not discriminate poor and needy patients. That's not the point. It is not excluded, that he is really more careful with rich patients, that he finds more time for them and behaves with them correctly and politely, but only therefore, that he is afraid of them, but not because he does not put in anything the poor patients.


No, the main problem with Dr. Morris is different: it is, first, his fieriness, irascibility, roughness, and such a behavior that is offending human dignity of patients.


He is also not able to work with people; and he does not care to be able to work with people.


Secondly, he does not wish to inform patients about the results of exams and analyses, does not allow to describe the symptoms, and does not wish to listen to complaints to sharp deterioration, and it is all together - negatively affects the trust of patients (that served very bad service in my case, too), have a bad impact on diagnostics, so, that as it is possible to assume, for a number of the patients, Dr. Morris is a bad diagnostician, with all consequences of it.


Thirdly, his obvious conflict of interests does not allow him to work with people, because, trying to prove that, thanks to his DoctorDirect.com, patients must wait at his office for the reception much less time than in offices of other doctors, and, trying to keep in within his time schedule, he, perhaps, not follows his patients as it should be adapted to needs of patients, sometimes reducing the time of their exam to just 2-3 minutes.


Perhaps, he more loyally also shows consideration for the faces of Jewish origin (or to those, who are sent to him by doctors with Jewish roots), about what a number of facts testifies.


Here one of indirect materials:


EIDINGER, Samuel. Peacefully on Thursday, November 7, 2002. Beloved husband of Rose

Nerenberg. Son of the late Mendel and the late Ethel Eidinger. Dear father and father-in-law of

Harvey and Gabriela, John and Gloria, and Mitchell. Cherished Grandpa Sam of Heather,

Edward, Alexandra, Matthew and Derek. Much loved brother and brother-in-law of Ben and

Sally, Sarah and Joe Backer, Jennie Kliger, late Benzion, late Harold and the late Anne

Nerenberg, Helene and the late Daniel Nerenberg. He will be sadly missed by his nieces,

nephews, great-nieces, great-nephews, family and friends. The family would like to thank Dr.

Peter Lipes, Dr. Brian Morris and the 5th Floor staff of the St. Mary's Hospital for their care and

compassion. Funeral Service from Paperman and Sons, 3888 Jean Talon West on Sunday,

November 10 at 1 p.m. Burial at the Jewish Assistance Cemetery, De la Savane. Shiva private.

Donations in his memory may be made to the charity of your choice. Published in Montreal

Gazette on Nov. 10, 2002.


Fifthly, doctor Morris, apparently, trying to prove to himself, or to someone that the service of his firm DoctorDirect saves public funds and resources, he refuses vital medications and tests to patients, which sometimes: a matter of life and death.


It is possible to assume that he more willingly prescribes drugs and gives requisitions on medical procedures to people with private insurance.


Returning to my personal tragedy, I have to note that, despite all his negative qualities and negative methods of work, Dr. Morris, nevertheless, did, at least, SOMETHING for me, while another urologist - Dr. Daniel Pharan - only mocked over me, and did not prescribe ANY medications, though (I try to be objective) many times sent me to lab tests (in the Hôpital Hôtel Dieu, it was much easier to do, because there the local laboratory worked with urologists in particular treatment). But doctor Pharan, checking a sample in his office, and seeing on "litmus" strip that there is an infection, NEVER asked a question - why even a SINGLE of dozens of the laboratory analysis did not reflect this infection, and the infection's agent was not found.


On the other hand, not all results of analyses, which I passed in that period in Hotel Dieu, were known to me, and, it is possible that some one analysis, or more: found an infection, but Dr. Pharan told nothing to me about it, and did not appoint a course of antibiotics.


Unlike doctor Pharan, Dr. Morris used to tell me - during the first 2 or 3 rendezvous - if the "litmus" strip showed an infection, but only till the 3-d or 4-th appointment, and, after this, he not only ceased to inform me about the office infection tests' results, but also covered from me the "litmus" paper strip.


At least, 2 or 3 times Dr. Morris found an infection by his office test, but refused to administrate a laboratory tests on urine microbiology culture, or (if nevertheless wrote out a requisition, or I got a referral from other doctor) - ignored the lack of any information on infection in the laboratory analyses, though could not but understand that these analyses are forged.


Till March, 2015, Dr. Morris treated me ALMOST like he treated the majority of other patients: that is, behaved with me no more roughly and unfriendly, than with them, and also opposed to the purposes of analyses and exams.


If to take into account the administration of courses of treatment, he, though under pressure (i.e. only under pressure of mine insistent demands and protests), but nevertheless prescribed certain medicines, but these prescriptions changed almost anything in my destiny (because were written out too late, after a number of refusals, or drugs, obviously useless for me, were prescribed - instead of those, which I asked for; or, because Dr. Morris refused to administrate alternative to cystoscopy exams): all this would be possible to explain by his unbalanced and quick-tempered nature, or by the fact that this doctor and I, his patient, did not get on together.


However, still something, almost inaudible, could be admitted in his behavior.


So, 2 or 3 times it looked like he administrated, for example, a cytology - not only because, nevertheless, conceded mine demands, but as though despite someone else, like to spite somebody, because could not submit to someone and to be urged on.


Besides, 2 or 3 times he left me in the exams room for more 3 or 4 minutes, to explain that - at a urological infection - can help hot sedentary bathtubs, cranberry juice, "garlic therapy", and for its prevention - not only a precept "not to overcool", or an exclusion of spicy, salty, or bitter food (he knew that it is already known to me), but also cold drinks. And I did not release by then that he could do it not only for my benefit, but as though to spite of someone invisible.


However, already during the next appointment, Dr. Morris ceased to give me such advices, and, on the contrary, began to disprove what he advised me earlier, presenting it as "useless". And, even more: he started to state such "advises", which could bring me to a very bad end, if I followed them (for example, he advised to drink less liquids (for preventing urgency), which could bring to stones formation in the bladder much earlier than it happened).


In the same way, there is a point that the succession of events (tragic for me) were defined not only by the personal qualities of Dr. Morris and his attitude towards me, but also something that placed incomparably higher than the level of Dr. Morris, and that some of his acts and statements (like the talks about the cost of laboratory analyses and others procedures, which I demanded; statements that antibiotics are "not allowed" to me "any more", or that - as an "ideological enemy" - I am "treated too well ", etc.


Why he or someone else decided that antibiotics "are not allowed" for me anymore, and why?


Who decided that I am an "ideological enemy" and whose ideological enemy: an enemy of the medical system? some religion? some country? some organization?


Whether Dr. Morris tried to hint by the phrase about antibiotics or about an "ideological enemy" that he has nothing to do with the "medical repressions", that it is not his initiative?


And such facts are gathered in big numbers.


Therefore, a question of who arranged the "loss" of March 2-3, 2015 analysis - remains open...


CHAPTER 6.


- 12 -


In the light of all previous narratives, it is worth retelling about the sequence of events.


On February 27, 2015, I am sending a fax to Dr. Morris, which meaning came down to the following: by his mistrust to my complaints and concerns about dangerous urological problems, plus, his refusal of "agreeable for me" diagnostics (I rejected cystoscopy, which already turn to be a disaster years ago, without bringing any benefits), and his refusal of treatment (and, in particular, his refusal of antibiotics (for acute UTI treatment), Dr. Morris provoked serious complications, which ALREADY affected my health, and my health will be more destroyed, more (longer) he will refuse diagnostics and treatment.


I asked Dr. Morris in my fax:


"Dear Doctor!

Will you trust in objectiveness of my complaints and my description of an acute UTI infection, if tests for microbiology/culture would reveal a bacterial infection?

Will you consider it a grounded proof that my worries and concerns, and my description of annoying and dangerous urological problems and conditions are not a product of my "imagination" or "hypochondria", but a result of real untreated urological conditions?"


I repeat: it was on February 27.


And here, on March 2-3, the laboratory test on microbiology / bacterial culture, probably, found an acute bacteriological infection, but this analysis, unfortunately, was done St.-Mary's Hospital, where Dr. Morris works.


In other words, on February 27, 2015, in my fax, I put forward reproaches to doctor Morris, which justice a new laboratory analysis could confirm, and - in 2-3 days - this analysis confirmed correctness of my charges (because revealed an infection, which I declared).


Besides, the requisition for this analysis was prescribed not by Dr. Morris (because he refused it to me), but by doctor Rohan, which is very important concerning other details in this story.


And here, apparently at once someone, who knows about this analysis, considered that the only way to avoid a scandal: is to destroy the section of this analysis, which displays the result of microbiology (bacterial culture), and, indeed, this particular section somehow "evaporated".


This person (or group of individuals?), probably, did not begin "to jump off the deep end" immediately, and did not destroy this result at once, in the first days of March. For this reason, at first, my access to this test's report was simply blocked; and only a bit later I was allowed to see it, and discovered that all other pages of its report are "missing", except of one (1) (probably, only by then, when other data were destroyed).


It is not in my capabilities to find out if 2 persons - Dr. Brian Morris and Dr. Robert Cox (2 friends) - were involved on this test's disappearance, but they are primary suspects (the more so, that both shared the "common cause" (ardently stood on guard, blocking an access to medical information to patients, their close relatives, and all other persons; see examples (given above) of patients' statements about Dr. Morris, from which follows that doctor Morris also painfully, as well as professor Cox, perceived a permission of access for patients to medical documents, such as the results of exams, laboratory analyses, and so forth, blocking this access).


What was their following step if it was no problem for Robert Cox Sr. (even without any help or aid of Robert Cox Jr.) to destroy a result of any medical data (exams or analysis, and so on)?


It is possible even not to call it...


So - in my case - they did not just limit or closed for me an access to lab test, but went much further.


The obliteration, falsification, and loss of my analyses' and other med. exams' results used to happen before, but never before were followed by such an impudence and such full range of actions of medical establishment: as provocations, diversions, repressions, and sabotage.


Not accidentally, the reply to my complaint concerning the loss of this analysis reminds not an investigation (of this incident), but the indictment against the victim, as if it was not hospital's guilt, but my guilt.


I received a respond to my complaint from M-me Sara-Beth Trudeau, St.-Mary Hospital's ombudsman. It is not known to me - if she routinely responds to all complaints, or she is used for "special occasions".


A surname of Trudeau - is not rarity in Canada at all, so, there are no bases to rank everyone, who carries this surname, to the family of the former prime minister of Canada - Pierre-Eliot Trudeau, and his son, the present prime minister, Justin Trudeau, but, if suddenly madam Sara-Beth Trudeau, the ombudsman St. Mary's Hospital, is a member of this "political" dynasty, and IF she doesn't respond to ALL the complains, in that case, she was not accidentally chosen to be charged with this action. But even if she has no relation to Trudeau political dynasty, it could be used for the same reason - even as a namesake (if, of course, complaints did not arrive to her purely automatically).


Now, before analyzing mine correspondence with her, it is necessary to retell all events again, at first, having refreshed an event row in memory.


As I already described in this chronicle, on November 3, 2014 (precisely on my birthday): first symptoms of just next recurrence of acute infection (UTI) appeared. I addressed to the urologist, Dr. Morris, asking to prescribe antibiotics and to administrate a urine test for infection (microbiology culture).


Dr. Morris not only boldly and aggressively refused antibiotics and tests, but (as I assume) also blocked an opportunity for me to receive antibiotics at other doctors.


Till December, 2014, other doctors, and all of them refused antibiotics and tests.


By denying me medical help, they provoked (already in the end of 2014) the worst form of acute infection since 2001, damage to urinal tract organs, dangerous autoimmune reaction, chronic bleedings (moderate and gross hematuria), cysts' formation, changes in blood formula, and arthritic attack.


In the end of November - beginning of December 2014, I already felt an impact on bones, joints, ligaments, and cartilage, accompanied by pain, reddening, swelling, abnormally rising joints' temperature.


Among all doctors, whom I visited in November-December 2014, only one female doctor from a walk-in clinic showed human approach, and administrated a complicated blood-urine test.


However, Montreal General Hospital's laboratory completely sabotaged the urine test, and, plus, did not do some of the analysis' components, mentioned in the requisition.


And, still, even such a "cut-down" test revealed some abnormalities, which never surfaced before, and this already signifies about a rapid and unusual (for me) deterioration.


Because the laboratory test was sabotaged, I demanded a repeated test from doctors (including Dr. Morris and my family doctor), but, till end of February 2015, no doctor issued a blood-urine test requisition. Only my family doctor signed such a requisition at the end of February 2015.


Besides the cyst, which appeared on an old scar on my back and was few times the cause of severe inflammation and abscesses (still, remaining very small, even miniscule), 3 other cysts have formed after November: a cyst on a scar from above of the left foot; a cyst under the left knee (from the back); and a cyst on my forehead. (Later editorial remark: All 3 cysts have disappeared after 2 urological surgeries in 2016-2017, which brings to a conclusion that their formation was, indeed, connected to the chronic urinal infection, its complications, and denial of medical help by Dr. Morris, and by other doctors).


There are also a number of indications that the arthritis was also provoked by the same factors.


Only my family doctor prescribed (April 3, 2015) Naproxen, through already too late, but the pharmacy sabotaged his prescription, restricting the course of treatment to just 1 week, instead of 2 weeks due to doctor's prescription.


At the end of 2014, I was already in despair - because of doctors' mistrust to my complaints about health problems, and to my description of symptoms, and because of their unwillingness to listen to my words about the sharp deterioration, and to their refusal to appoint adequate diagnostics and treatment.


Instead of carrying out their professional (medical) duty - and to render medical help for me, doctors were attacking me for alleged hypochondria, for "exaggerating" me health problems, and so on. Doctor Morris accused me in, supposedly, "doing" "too many analyses" (and, thereby, I, allegedly, "spending public money"); that for such an "ideological enemies" as I am - I am "treated too good"; that "antibiotics are not allowed" for me "any more", etc.


It undermined mine to trust to him, that, as a result, terminated for me pitifully, because I did not receive the help from this good specialist, which I could receive.


On my complaints on impossibility to leave a normal life because of "every minute" urgency; dysuria; pain; bleedings; impossibility to empty normally the bladder (and spending up to 10 and more minutes in the "room of reflections"); "interruptions"; semi-unconscious states (indispositions); kidney pains; and on a number of others frightening symptoms - Doctor Morris answered with accusations against me, and behaved as if I am a liar, and all the problems and symptoms are "thought up".


When, in the fall of 2014, an acute urological infection brought a new round of tortures, Dr. Morris not only refused antibiotics in a bold and aggressive form, but, as I suspect, blocked for me a possibility to receive antibiotics from other doctors, because later I received an almost certain proof of this, and because he is an exceptionally influential and possessing the administrative authority, and having big connections doctor.


It is not excluded that he even managed to force the medical authorities to place some mark in my McGill hospitals' and all-Quebec medical files.


I am sure that THIS (end of 2014) refusal of antibiotics led to more serious complications than ever before, and provoked a sharp deterioration in urological problems, and triggered the whole following drama of events, including 2 surgical operations and whole chain of further general declining of my health, including arthritis, gastroenterological, dermatological, and cardiovascular problems, etc.


Doctor Morris also accused me that - supposedly - I "do not allow" to diagnose my problems and to elaborate a right treatment, because I was refusing the cystoscopy.


However, he entirely ignored my explanations, when I said that I had an extremely negative experience, that the cystoscopy, performed by Dr. Daniel Pharan, left in me an acute infection, which was accompanied by intolerable itching, terrible pain, two-week bleeding, high temperature, and others serious complications, against the background of an absolute indifference of Dr. Pharan (who refused to see me, while it was he, who actually forced me to agree to cystoscopy, threatening otherwise to stop my visits and lab tests; Dr. Pharan also blocked to me the access of cystoscopy's result, which full printout "sank into a chasm" - and surfaced only few years later); and, when I addressed to ER, I was denied doctor's exam, and returned home without any medical inspection and without any help.


Therefore, I set to a condition to Dr. Morris for passing the cystoscopy: a) his promise that, in a case of complications, he will urgently see me and will provide hospitalization (if it is necessary); b) that - before cystoscopy - he will appoint a preventive course of antibiotics, or so-called one-time antibiotics' treatment, practiced before some medical procedures; and c) that I will be able to see and to copy an official printout (report of the result) of cystoscopy at once - as soon as it is ready.


Dr. Morris answered to my demands that it he, but not I, lay down conditions, and that he will not promise anything. By the way, for the first time he started talking about cystoscopy - and began to insist on it - only at the beginning or in the middle of 2014.


When I asked him, what he - in general - hopes to confirm or to rule out with the help of cystoscopy, and why the cystoscopy is so necessary for in my specific case, he did not answer to my lawful question.


He also answered nothing, when I asked him, whether a computer tomography (CT-scan) combined with ultrasonography (before and after depletion) and transrectal ultrasound, MRI, uroflow test, or other tests - may answer the question, which he hopes to clear up with the cystoscopy (in my case), but he refused to reply (again!), and also refused these tests.


After the failure of my first attempts to pass to other urologist, and facing the prospects of even faster deterioration of my condition, at the end of February 2014, and on February 27, 2015, I sent several messages to Dr. Morris by fax - with my insistent demands to begin, after all, a medical treatment, and listed my requests and requirements.


Especially I emphasized that his (Dr. Morris's) mistrust to my complaints and concerns related to dangerous urological problems, and refusal of diagnostics and treatment (and, in particular, refusals of antibiotics concerning an acute UTI), provoked serious complications, which ALREADY affected my health, and it will further destroy it.


Whether it is worth being surprised to the fact that psychiatric provocations and illegal psychiatric evaluations on December 9 at Dr. Semret and in the office of Dr. Rohan 16 December, 2013, and also at Dr. Jiri Krasny - were - it looks (as explained in this chronicle for previous years), provoked by medical officials, and also by some doctors?


Whether it is worth being surprised to the fact that, contrary to my written requests, which I handled to my family doctor, and to other doctors, whom I visited (to urologist, Dr. Morris; to infectologist (earlier, even before this crisis: in 2013); and to 6 other doctors in clinics without rendezvous; later - to otolaryngologist, Dr. Sejean: to refer me to a specialist hematologist (which I motivated by a risk of an immunological reaction to systematic infections, which are capable to provoke dangerous impacts on the hemopoiesis' mechanism (perhaps, in the fall of 2014, in 2015, and the beginning of 2016, it was not late yet, and an intervention of a hematologist with a purpose of a corresponding treatment still could prevent and stop possible consequences, and to prevent a sort of a time bomb): all these requests were rejected?


Whether it is worth being surprised to the fact that - on Tuesday, November 25, 2014 - having attended appointment to doctor Morris with a plentiful hematochezia and hematuria, I did not see from him any reactions, except a requisition on blood test (whether it is strange that a urologist "forgot" to include into this requisite also a urine test?).


Whether it is strange that though spontaneous bleeding of a hematochezia happened directly before my visit to Dr. Morris, he, wiping his hands in medical gloves, smeared by blood, did not even take care to take an interest and somehow to comment what he seen and heard?


Whether it is necessary to be surprised to the fact that the analysis, which presumably confirmed a UT infection (March 2, 2015; laboratory of St.-Mary's Hospital, where Dr. Morris work and where he has an unimaginable influence): at first, disappeared (except of only 1 page), and then was in general (including this 1 page) replaced by a false one?


(Especially as doctor Morris aggressively REFUSED referrals to laboratory analyses, and, therefore, Dr. Rohan administrated this test for me).


Whether it is worth being surprised to the fact, that, having come to reception to doctor Morris on March 2, 2015 (on the same day when I passed this analysis), I told him that - directly from him - I am going to the laboratory to pass a urine test, and THIS particular test disappeared? (I also spoke to doctor Morris about the fact that - on March 1 and early in the morning, on March 2, 2015 (prior to a visit to him) I having felt gripes in the bladder).


Whether it is worth being surprised that that day (March 2, 2015), at Dr. Morris's office, I did not receive a warm welcome? Never before I saw him such aggressive, rough, angry and unfriendly.


Whether it is worth being surprised to the fact that - in that day - on my way from his office to St.-Mary's Hospital's laboratory, and from there to my home - I was persistently escorted be police?


Whether it is worth being surprised that doctor Morris practically stopped accepting me, contrary to my insistent calls to his secretary and numerous requests about an urgent rendezvous?


Since March 2, 2015, till November, 2015, I could not book any appointment with Dr. Morris though he perfectly knew, how serious are my problems and how urgently they need his attention.


Since March 2015, till November 2015, I addressed to 5 urologists or their secretaries, in my attempts to become a patient of another specialist and to leave Dr. Morris alone, but all of them told me that I "must" stay a patient of Dr. Morris, and - with all my problems - to go only to him! There no doubts that Dr. Morris has blocked me an access to all other urologists in Montreal.


On March 2, 2015, his secretary handed me his business card with an appointed to November 26, 2015 (17:10) rendezvous.


Dr. Morris's business card of with the rendezvous for November 26, 2015 (signed on 2-nd March, 2015).


In the previous material, it was already underlined that this rendezvous (26-11-2015) - most likely - was sabotaged, because it looked like Dr. Morris's office was closed on that day. I skip this episode, as it was described in the previous books.


Also, I already described that, during the 2-3-2015 rendezvous, Dr. Morris did the most outraged statements, and made the most unethical points. So, to my rhetorical question, how can I live with the symptoms and syndromes like very considerable urgency, interruptions, bleeding, etc., he told me "You drink too much; drink less liquids". When I said that already drink "less liquids" - because otherwise can not go outside, and posed a contra-question about stones formation (that will be provoked by "less liquids"), Dr. Morris declared another outraged maxim.


I already defined the 2-nd March, 2015, as a kind of a turning point, because, since then (after March 2015), Dr. Morris actually ceased to talk to me, stopped answering to my greetings and react to my questions.


I already described his mockeries and provocation, which became cynically open after 2-nd March.


I already described his outraged fury and anger, which he did not hide, when spoke to me on 2-3-2015.


I already described that, instead of Flomax, he wrote out a prescription for a psychiatric medication (2 Mar. 2015). (See the image below)


I already described, how he responded to my worries about the rapid advance of hyperplasia (from 40 to nearly 80 cm3, i.e. literally twice in a short period) with even greater rage, and tore the paper of the ultrasound report right throught in an uncontrolled anger.


I already described a confusion about "Xand" in the pharmacy, and it's replacement with Alfusosin.


It is unnecessary to mention - how such an enraged person, who could not control his anger (as Dr. Morris on 2-nd March, 2015); who was almost ready to jump on me and to kill me in his fury, could react to my laboratory test, which - for sure - might prove his unsuitability for his profession (if was not destroyed).


Should we doubt that such a furious man (as Dr. Morris, in his anger at me) was capable to destroy my laboratory test (if found a way to do so)?


Whether it is necessary to be surprised to the fact that the original of the requisition on this laboratory analyses (2 tests: blood and urine; in the registry of St.-Mary Hospital's laboratory, they made next marks 1) yellow - meaning that only a blood test was left, and 2) crossed out (by blue felt-tip pen) urine test - meaning that it was "already done"): much later "materialized" in my family doctor's office? In the printout of only 1 "not missing" page (of this analysis' result) - it was specified that "the patient still will come for blood test". Besides, it was also mentioned in the paper, which I received in the registry on March, 2, 2015.


Doctor Brian Morris.


In the morning (April 10, 2015), I came to the secretary of my family doctor, and asked a permission to copy the 2-nd page of the last urinalysis' report (from March 2, 2015).


Instead of this document, she gave me a blood test result, which I did not check before.


I understood that an access to the full printout of March 2, 2015, lab test' result is blocked for me, or something is not OK with this analysis.


In the same morning - on April 10, 2015 - I went to St.-Mary's Hospital's laboratory to pass the blood test (one part of the lab test on this requisition was done by then (on 2 Mar. 2015), and, later, most of the pages of this blood test's report also "disappeared").


When, on April 10, 2015, I, having waited for my turn, handled 2 papers (requisition with the marks, and the printout (additional page, which I received on 2-3-2015) in a registration window, the registration nurse exchanged significant glances with her neighbor, and then - with the standing here (behind her back) female supervisor, and, despite the fact that it was specified - in both documents - that I already passed the urine test, she said that I have to do the urine test again. I told that I already handed over a sample on March 2, 2015, and, in order to avoid confusion, error, and misunderstanding - I will not do an additional urine test, and going to pass ONLY the blood test.


I was already taking antibiotics by then, and so, a repeated urinalysis could not detect a bacterial infection, and I did not want to do a useless test.


In addition, the remark "the patient to return for blood tests" was entered into the computer database and was even printed in the non-complete (with missing microbiology!) urine test from 2-3-2015, so, every member of the medical staff was, certainly, aware about it. It means that the authorities so intimidated and corrupted the conscience of young Canadians that any one of them now became capable to comply, becoming an accomplice in any government's crime. And, still, the ordinary Canadian preserved, at least, some remains of the conscience, because, finally (running forward) they allowed me to pass the blood test, but, however, other Canadians then destroyed 11 of 13 blood test result pages...


The women have exchanged glances again, and - after this - the registration nurse, in turn, started to insist on a repeated urine test. Seeing that I hold the ground, they burst all together, interrupting each other, and - if I correctly understood - wanted to tell that, without a repeated analysis, I "should not have the blood test". And, nevertheless, their hands - in contradiction to their words - passed me all papers, which are needed for the blood test, having attached to them the coupon of the waiting line number.


In the sample collection room, a black nurse, in turn, also tried to put the same condition and to force or persuade me to pass the urine test again (which I already passed on March, 2, 2015), but I resolutely refused, and she gave out.


So, on April 10, 2015, I passed only a blood test.


On the same day, I tried to contact the laboratory' administration - to find out what happened to my analysis from March 2, 2015, but at once understood that it is a deadlock way.


Then I went to the medical archive, but they refused to give me any references, also saying that copies are not issued to patients, whose doctors are not working directly in the hospital, but in their own medical offices.


In the previous parts, it was already told about the blood test from April, 10, 2015, about abnormal results in the blood formula counts, and about the disappearance of all pages of this blood test, besides 2 of them + a forged report on "urine test", which soon replaced the genuine original page of the previously issued report of the test from March, 2, 2015, which simply disappeared from the database and from the medical archive.


Copies (images) of these 3 remained (non-missing) paged were also already presented in the previous books of the "urological saga".


Totally, there were 13 pages of 2-3-2015-10-4-2015 tests, according to fax requisites, printed automatically during the fax submission. Every page of this blood-urine test was marked as "1 of 13", or "8 of 13", and so on, but only 2 survived, plus, the forged "urine" test's page, dated 10-4-2015.


I also already analyzed (in the previous books) this medical fraud in all details and as a whole scam.


Studying the blood test's indicators, and pointing to some abnormal results, I made a conclusion that, because never before such abnormalities were present in my blood tests, this fact supports my claim (stated in my fax (February (2015) to Dr. Morris) that Dr. Morris already ruined my health by sabotaging the most basic medical help and provoking grave complications.


I already pointed the fact that, perfectly knowing that I am suffering from considerable, and, sometimes, gross hematuria, Dr. Morris wrote in the requisitions and prescriptions "micro-hematuria".


I also noted unusual or non-standard features in this blood test's report (from 10 Apr. 2015), and, in particular, the rheumatology factor indication, which was crucial for the documental prove that my statement about the arthritis attack (ignored by the doctors and provoked by their sabotage of medical help) was truthful.


I also already explained, why the indicators of (later confiscated ("vanished") urine test's result (from 2-3-2015) were fraudulent, in exception of urinalysis microscopy (both indicators abnormal), spec. gravity (low, abnormal), ph (ALMOST abnormal, high), and blood (abnormal, "Moderate").


However, even this (partially! forged) report later vanished, disappearing from all digital databases, and from the medical archive, and was replaced by an "additional" page, dated 10-4-2015, with a remark "patient refused to provide a urine sample". However, other requisites on this forged page contradict such a remark: "Microbiology", "midstream", "collected 10-04-2015", etc.


The fact that the remark "patient refused to provide a urine sample" was placed under the "Urine Culture" subsection - fully explains the objective of this fraud. Because the "bacterial culture" (microbiology) was missing in the previous - original - report for the test from March, 2, 2015, the bureaucrats decided to "replace" it by a forgery (bogus) report, which "justified" the missing (from 2-nd of March, 2015) bacterial culture by this fraudulent remark ("patient refused to provide a urine sample"). And, because this did not match the urine test's report from 2-3-2015, and the date 10-4-2014 did not match the date of the real test, they just confiscated the previous report from everywhere.


I already described strange (and illegal?) "displacements" of the original requisition for this March-April 2015 test (from the lab to my family doctor's office, and from the office to the lab; back and forth, back and forth), and its "metamorphosis"; and illustrated my description by the images of the initial requisition without the later remarks, its transformation by the remarks, and by its photo, when it was situated on my family doctor's office table.


I also expressed a guess that, when I came to my family doctor's office in March, few days after the lab test, the test's report could still exist, and was destroyed days later.


After assessing all these - repeated - details and facts, nobody will doubt that the incident with the nurse Joanna Priestley and the illegal psychiatric evaluation on April 24, 2015, was a deliberate and planned provocation (prepared in advance, with a certitude that I'll show up soon (after the incident with March-April lab test) in one of McGill medical centers' Emergency Department). This was a counterattack (after stated by me complains), and an act of vengeance - rolled into one.


Between April 11 and 15 (2015) I visited St.-Mary's medical archive 2 more times, but copies of my lab tests for March 2, 2015, and April 10, 2015, were refused all the same.


On March 4, 2015, I passed an X-ray of left elbow (with the requisition from my family doctor), but, to the end of April, 2015, the doctor claimed that did not received its result in his office. However, I found out that - in the Intelerad system PACS system (pacs.vmmed.com) - this X-ray was assessed on the same day (March 4, 2015), registered under the number code "X-Ray 20150304-053", and was "sent by fax" to dr. Ivan Rohan (514) 731-0395) on the same day.


However, I am not sure - whom to trust, - because witnessed so many improbable and scandalous things in Quebec's medical institutions, and discovered so much lie, fraud, and forgery in the medical domain, that I'll rather recognize more probable a possibility that this X-ray's result was never sent to my family doctor, because the Intelerad PACS system in 2015 was still controlled by 2 representatives by Cox dynasty - Robert Cox Sr., and Robert Cox Jr., who had an access to all the data. It is also not excluded that my family doctor was contacted by the "medical administration", and was forced to conceal the report of this X-ray from me, because it revealed just another scandalous revelation. In the past years, I had 2 significant traumas of my left elbow, and went to emergency rooms, but was told that there is "nothing serious", and was sent home without any medical help and even without any careful medical attention.


Now, it was found by this X-ray that there are "degenerative change, fracture or intrinsic bony abnormality". Another scandalous thing is that, contrary to objective x-ray's findings, the final statement (under "Impressions" section) was "unremarkable elbow radiographs".


Whatever side imitated this x-ray's postponement or disappearance (Intelerad system; or my family doctor): this sabotage did not allow me to receive at the doctor (who was still "waiting for X-ray's result") anti-inflammatory in time - and that led to joints' damage.


(Some of the original assessments (results, reports) of medical images - X-rays, ultrasonography, and others: could be distorted or completely replaced with the false ones at the level of someone from the heads of Intelerad system, and, first of all, the result of ultrasonography from February, 2016.)


The same story happened also to the result of MRI-scan [Jean-Talon Hospital (October 16, 2013)]. Its result never came to Dr. Jiri Krasny's office, which did not allow the doctor to obtain additional and very important information that could change his assessment of my arthritic problems, bringing benefits to medical treatment and its success.


The sabotage of my laboratory analyses occurred also in the laboratory of Montreal General Hospital (MGH), where - at first - they blocked for me an access to the result of the urine test [8-9 January, 2003 (MGH(ospital)], and it became clear that something is not OK with this test. Later I found out that all pages of this test "were gone" (disappeared), except of one, where it was specified "Urinary tract infection", but no more explanations or data was provided, in spite of the remark "see below" and "2 bacteria".


On November 27, 2014 - in the same laboratory of MGH - the urine test was completely sabotaged. (See the full description of this incident in the previous text's sections)


Other components of this blood-urine test from 27-11-2014 were also sabotaged:


In this requisite the next components were checked:

1) Electrolytic profile.

2) Liver profile.

3) Special immunoglobulin-A test.

4) Hematologic test: ANA (anti-nuclear antibodies), full blood count,

prothrombin, PTT, reticulate, sedimentation.

5) Serological ASO test.

6) Microbiology (culture).

7) Urine test.


However, some other sections (and subsections) of this test (besides the urine test and the microbiology culture (urine) were also sabotaged.


These are just few selective (and less tangled) examples of manipulations with my lab tests and other exams on requisitions of 3 doctors: Dr. Ivan Rohan, Dr. Jiri Krasny, and doctor form the walk-in clinic. Totally, there are more "missing", falsified, incomplete, etc. lab tests and other medical exams before and after 2015.


Thus, the loss of March-April, 2015 test was not the first and single, and fits into the whole picture of manipulations and fraud, but has - at the same time - the whole set of absolutely unique features: 1) unlike anonymity of people and technical mechanisms standing behind the previous similar cases, THIS TIME the sabotage revealed the real people behind it and particular precise tricks of fraud, cover up, forgery, concealment, theft of medical documents, and so on, exposing the PARTICULAR PERSONS: a) employee of St.-Mary's Hospital's laboratory (registration nurses, their supervisor, blood collecting nurse, and others); c) the medical staff of another hospital is Montreal (MGH) (nurse Joanna Priestly, doctors, and other individuals); d) high-ranking functionaries of McGill health centers' administration (responsible for nearly 10 huge hospitals), signed under replies to my complaints (Mr. Robert Cox, Mr. Valois, Mr. Charles Gauthier, M-me Sara-Beth Trudeau, etc.); 2) THIS TIME medical criminals not only attacked the objectiveness of medical data and the impartiality, non-political attitude, and fairness of medical treatment, but also attacked me personally in a gangster-police style, which makes it different from all such previous incidents.


It shows how much - during the disgusting Harper era - the psychology of Canadians has changed, and underlined the fact that - from now on - any brutal, repressive, and criminal orders will be implicitly executed at all levels, as it happened during the era of terrible European totalitarian dictatorships in 1930-s-1940-s.


Contrary to aspirations that Trudeau government will bring a relief, and will save Canada from this totalitarian British-style royal oppression, Harper's tyrannical dictatorship regime survived under Trudeau, just receiving a new "show-window".


What happened during the loss of my lab analysis of March-April, 2015: this is a broad collusion at the level of the whole mechanism medical care system.


CHAPTER 7.


APRIL 16, 2015.

I sent a fax to St.-Mary's medical archive. They contacted me by phone, telling that I must come there in person and to fill out the form on place, but warned that - all the same - I will not get the copies of the demanded (by me) blood-urine test from March, 2 - April, 10, 2015. (See below)


The form completed, scanned and sent fax to medical archive of St.-Mary's Hospital. (See above). Besides, my wife herself took a paper copy of the same formulary (signed by me) to this medical archive, and left it by them. I also present (see above) the fax requisites, with the destination's fax number. (See to the right of the form)


I present (see below) other fax requisites and the 2-nd page of the fax message:


See below the digitalized text of this message (its content):


From Leon (Lev) GUNIN

................

Montreal, Quebec

RAMQ number:

Hospital card number:

tel/fax

(please, call before faxing)

To Medical Records

St. Mary's Hospital Center

3830 Lacombe Avenue

Montreal (Quebec) H3T 1M5

tel. (514) 734-2617

fax.: (514) 734-2663

REQUEST

Not capable to obtain my urinalysis (03/03/2015) from

other sources, I ask you to send it to me by fax or mail.

I also need my blood test (10/04/2015), as I mention in the

application-form attached.

Because the Medical Records Archive is my last and only

source for obtaining these 2 tests' data, I demand a

printed explanation if my request will be refused (then,

please, include reasons for systematic denial to me an

access to my medical data such as blood, urine,

X-Rays, ultrasound, etc.).

A standard fulfilled form Authorization to Release

Information... is included in the present fax as its

next page.

I appreciate your quick response.

Yours truly,

L. Gunin 16 April 2015.


APRIL, 17, 2015.

On April 17, 2015, in the morning, I came to St.-Mary's archive with my oldest daughter. She asked to show her the rules, on the basis of which the archive's staff is refusing me the copies of medical documents.


The same worker, who - on April 16, 2015 - spoke to me by phone, showed some paper in French, but said that will not give it in hands, and allowed only to see several lines holding it in the front of my daughter's face.


When I asked why it is impossible to pick up 2 pages of these regulations-instructions normally, to read them, or even to copy them, the employee (of medical archive) said, that it is a classified document, and that she already exceeded her authority, having shown it to us.


Then we (my daughter and me) came to my family doctor's secretary, and asked her, with the doctor's consent, to try to obtain the lacking pages from the medical archive: the components of laboratory analysis from March 2 - April 10, 2015: microbiology (including culture), biochemistry, etc.


She - herself - phoned to the archive, and received an answer that the page of the 2-3-2015 test's result, which copy the doctor already has (and which copy I already have): the only one, and there are more pages of the same analysis (i.e. they are missing). The missing paged of the test from April 10, 2015, are also "lost", was told to my family doctor's secretary by the archive's staff.


I will not disclose how, but I managed to get the text of that "classified" "internal" St.-Mary Hospital's secret "resolution"-rules, which was not given to my daughter even in hands, and was showed from distance - as, allegedly, a proof that archivists act not on the whims, closing me the access to my analyses (see below).


10-11-2003.


AVIS AUX EMPLOYÉS DES ARCHIVES

MÉDICALES ET DES LABORATOIRES

Re : DEMANDE DES RESULTATES DES TESTS DE LABORATOIRE POUR LES

PATIENTS PROVENANT DU BUREAU PRIVÉ DES MÉDECINS (POD)


Avis aux employés des archives médicales et des laboratoires.


Re: Demandes des résultats de tests de laboratoire pour les patients provenant du bureau privé de médecins (POD).


Suite à une réunion entre le département des archives et des laboratoires, il a été convenu, que:


1) Le laboratoires informent les patients que les résultats sont transmis au médecin référent dans un délai de 24 à 48 heures, après la pris de sang. Ils doivent contacter ce médecin pour obtenir le résultat verbal ou obtenir une photocopie [highlighted]. Cela s'applique également dans le cas où le patient voyage à l'étranger.

2) Ils est possible de faire une demande d'accès aux archives pour transmettre ce résultat à un autre médecin. Dans ce cas le délai est de 2 à 3 semaines.

3) S'il ya Urgence Médical, le médecin ayant obtenu les résultats dans les 25 heures contactera le patients pour l'en aviser. Lorsque l'urgence est motivée, tout autre médecin pourra contacter les archives et obtenir par fax les résultats dans un délai de 24 à 48 heures, s'il nous fourni le consentement du patient.

4) Le département des archives médical s'obtiendra de donner des résultats au patient lui-même, puisque le personnel n'est pas en mesure d'évaluer la condition du patient, ni d'en interpréter les résultats.


Merci de votre collaboration,


Isabelle Roy,

Archives Médical

Responsable du secteur de l'accès à l'information.


cc. Louise Quellet Legaut

cc. Régina Zver


I hope that the names Isabelle Roy ("king" in French), Louise Legaut (possible coded meaning: Legate), and Régina Zver ("Regina" - queen; "zver" in Slavic languages: "wild creature", monster, animal): these are not pseudonyms of equally "secret" - as well as this circular itself - anonymous persons, but names of real women.


Mocking on us, immigration officials in 1990-s did not sign their letter, being completely anonymous, or signed their letters by names like Jeanne d'Arc, Honoré de Balzac, Julius Caesar, or Napoleon Bonaparte. (See the 1-st book of this chronicle and the corresponding documents in it).


I also emphasized in my previous reports that the cited (see above) document is an illegal base for an excuse for blocking an access to medical documents. I already explained, why it has no legal value by its form and by its content.


From February to April 2015, I sent 4 faxes to doctor Morris and to my family doctor, in which reproached Dr. Morris for closing to me the access to treatment, and, in particular, to antibiotics and anti-inflammatory.


I also laid on him the responsibility for blocking (to me) the access to the most necessary diagnostic procedures.


Besides, I reproached Dr. Morris and my family doctor with administrating medications or tests months after my demands in connection with traumas, infections, inflammations, abscess, arthritis, or other acute diseases, i.e. much later (when they are already senseless or useless), which turned into a continuous practice, so, that FORMALLY drugs - as though - are formally prescribed (every time - too late!), and, therefore, on bureaucratic criterions, it seems lake patient's claims are groundless. But - actually - AFTER an acute stage, such prescriptions can bring only a partial and very little help.


While my family doctor understood my situation and my despair, excused me my reproaches, and softened his stand, Dr. Morris, in turn, turned furious to such a degree that could not control himself.


Now, let us assume that the test from March 2, 2015, revealed both infection and also an increased level uric acids (hyperuricemia), which made my claims to Dr. Morris justified.


Not only Dr. Morris, but the whole medical system would be "embarrassed".


To summarize all the above mentioned facts, statements, and assessments, it is possible to assume that, despite some really noble and compassionate actions of few knowledgeable doctors, who save me from greater troubles, and, in some instances, saved my life, the system of Quebec-Canadian health care has exposed me to never-ending torture, proving to be not a system to heal, but a system to punish. In spite of its humanitarian nature in theory, this system is torturing and murdering people on practice.


Why, contrary to efforts of knowing doctors, Quebec good (by design) health care system, and to human social structure of the Quebec-Canadian society (which stopped to be human after approximately 2017), personally I faced systematic worsening of a number of difficulties and

negative trends, among which:


1) a ban (to doctors) to sound and officially register any diagnoses;

2) difficulty of getting an access to tests' results, or, at least, to a part of their contents;

3) falsification or withdrawal of exams and analyses data (or parts their contents);

4) restriction or complete closure of access to medications and diagnostic exams in the period of acute diseases, injuries, and aggravations (when the MOST ESSENTIAL medicines are necessary);

5) medications' prescription months after their urgent need, when they are not necessary any more, or cannot bring full benefit;

6) aggressive provocations in medical institutions (from longer - than for all other patients - waiting time, or hospitals' (or other medical institutions') attempts to provoke various conflicts - to illegal psychiatric evaluations);

7) mistrust to my complaints and concerns, to self-diagnoses, and to my objectivity in estimating the gravity of my indispositions and diseases;

8) disregard of my serious complaints and symptoms, terrible physical suffering, and shocking visually (or on symptoms) wounds, conditions, recurrences, or aggravations;

8) inaccessibility of doctors at the moments of the biggest urgency of their help (in time of outbreaks of acute diseases), or their refusal to carry out medical and diagnostic measures, and - in this regard - the compulsory address to Emergency Rooms, which increases suffering and stress;

9) cases of especially brutal, cruel, even sadistic treatment in the offices of Emergency Departments, as well as cases of politically motivated provocations.


Under the pressure of events, I wrote and sent (June 10, 2015) another letter to the ombudsman of St.-Mary's hospital - M-m Trudeau - (in Canadian French and Canadian English languages):


I need your help to investigate what happened to "Microbiology, Culture" part of my urinalysis from 02.03.2015.


On March 2, 2015 St.-Mary Hospital"s Lab received my sample for urinalysis (blood test was postponed).


When (10.04.2015) I came to St.-Mary"s Lab with a paper given to me there on 02.03.2015 (that excluded a urine test), I was told to collect a urine sample (again?).


I refused: to prevent a collision of 2 samples.


Later the report on 10.04.2015, mentioning just microbiology, claims that "patient refused to provide a urine sample" (as if I never provided a urine sample on 02.02.2015).


I also need your help in obtaining all 13 pages of my blood test on 10.04.2015.


Yours Sincerely, Lev (Leon) Gunin [tel/fax (514) ...

(please, call before faxing)


Attached:

1) Urinalysis 02.03.2015 ("page 1 of 1");

2) Alleged urinalysis 10.04.2015.


2. N'ayant pas reçu de réponse, le 6 mai 2015, je vous ai envoyé la lettre par fax, avec le même contenu et avec le post-scriptum : _____________________________________________________________________

As I received no answer or confirmation of the admission of my note, I repeat my submission by fax, adding an official complaint form.

____________________________________________________________________________

Dans le formulaire officiel joint à la lettre, j'ai inscrit :

____________________________________________________________________________

OVERVIEW OF THE SITUATION


I need your help to investigate what happened to 'Microbiology, Culture' part of my urinalysis from 02.03.2015.


The specimen was collected on March 2,2015, for urine C/S specific purpose (to track infection).


It is obvious from attached Laboratory Requisition document, which was the base for above mentioned test.


Also attached - copies:

1) Urinalysis 02.03.2015 ('page 1 of 1');

2) Alleged urinalysis 10.04.2015.


[In no way 2 different urine tests with 2 different requisition numbers (L9021289 and M0100951) can be produced from the same requisition document.]

____________________________________________________


J'ai joint la première page du résultat du urinalysis, ainsi que le pseudo-résultat.


3. Aujourd'hui, presque 1 mois plus tard, je n"ai reçu aucune réponse de vous.


Je voudrais vous demander une réponse officielle à ma demande, même si vous n"êtes pas en mesure de clarifier la situation.


Dans un tel cas, veuillez s.v.p. l"indiquer dans votre réponse.


Si cela ne relève pas de votre compétence, je vous prie de me donner les coordonnées d"une autre personne responsable, à laquelle je peux m'adresser.


Si on ne réussit pas à trouver et à récupérer l'analyse mentionnée, je voudrais tout de même recevoir les résultats d'autres tests que j"ai effectués, pour connaître les paramètres comme la C-Reactine, l'acide urique, l"entérocoque, la créatinine, etc., associés avec mes problèmes de santé.


C'est pourquoi je vous demande maintenant m'aider à accéder aux copies de toutes les analyses de sang et d'urine du laboratoire de l'hôpital St.-Mary de 2007 à 2015. Si cela ne relève pas de votre compétence, je vous prie de m'informer à qui je dois m'adresser.


4. Je veux ajouter qu"il y a déjà quelques années, l'archive médicale de l'hôpital St.-Mary me bloquait l'accès aux résultats de toutes les données, en se référant aux règlements intérieurs. Le 16 avril 2015, j'ai expédié aux archives un fax avec le contenu suivant :

__________________________________________________________________________

From Leon (Lev) GUNIN................

Montreal, Quebec ....

RAMQ number: ..........

Hospital card number: ........

tel / fax : ........ (please, call before faxing)


To Medical Records St. Mary's Hospital Center

3830 Lacombe Avenue Montreal (Quebec)

H3T 1M5

tel. (514) 734-2617 / fax.: (514) 734-2663


REQUEST

Not capable to obtain my urinalysis (03/03/2015) from other sources, I ask you to send it to me by fax or mail. I also need my blood test (10/04/2015), as I mention in the application-form attached.

Because the Medical Records Archive is my last and only source for obtaining these 2 tests" data, I demand a printed explanation if my request will be refused (then, please, include reasons for systematic denial to me an access to my medical data such as blood, urine, X-Rays, ultrasound, etc.).

A standard fulfilled form Authorization to Release Information... is included in the present fax as its next page. I appreciate your quick response.

Yours truly, L. Gunin 16 April 2015.

_________________________________________________

5. Je n'ai pas reçu de réponse écrite, mais quelqu'un de l'archive m'a téléphoné et m"a proposé de venir et de discuter.


Le 17 avril 2015, je suis venu à l"archive avec ma fille, et devant elle, là l"employée de l'archive a déclaré qu'il y a un règlement qui interdit de donner aux patients les résultats de leurs analyses.


Ma fille a demandé de lui montrer ce document.


La travailleuse a permis de lire quelques lignes du document, sans le lui laisser dans les mains, mais quand je voulais le copier, elle a déclaré qu"on ne peut pas le rapporter ou le photocopier.


Apparaît la question : comment l'hôpital civil peut fonctionner avec des lois cachées et avec des règlements couverts, qu'il est interdit de copier ?


6. Dans tous les cas, on devrait m'exclure de ces restrictions, pour des raisons très graves (mentionnées ci-haut).


Même la perte d'une seule analyse médicale est bizarre, mais dans mon cas, ce n"est pas la première fois. Pendant quelques années, certains médecins me donnaient (à ma demande) les copies de mes analyses, mais seulement des pages sélectives : par exemple, seulement 2 de 8, ou 3 de 15.


Je suis persuadé que j'ai toutes les raisons juridiques et humaines d"avoir le droit de connaître le contenu de ces pages qui étaient cachées de moi.


7. Il est tout à fait possible que les médecins eux-mêmes recevaient les rapports (les résultats des analyses) incomplets, et que les autres pages étaient retirées par quelqu'un.


Pour me dissuader et pour me montrer que les résultats de toutes les analyses et toutes leurs pages sont en place (et n'ont pas disparu), il suffirait de m'aider à recevoir leurs copies de l"archive.


8. J'espère, que c'est possible recevoir

1) une réponse écrite de vous, à propos de la disparation d"une partie de l'analyse d'urine 02.03.2015 ("Microbiology, Culture") ;

2) les copies de tous mes tests d"urine et de sang de 2007 à 2015 - sans transformer mon cas personnel et presque confidentiel à un cas publique.


Mon but initial est de trouver les solutions à mes problèmes de santé, plutôt que d"entamer un procès juridique.


Mes sentiments distingués,

Lev (Leon) Gunin.

2 Juin, 2015.


P.S. [1] Hier, le 2 juin 2015, j'ai reçu 2 documents des archives médicales, que je demandais et que je n"arrivais pas à recevoir. Je vous remercie beaucoup, car ils sont reçus, probablement, grâce à votre intervention. Il est triste cependant que, selon les pages arrivant par la poste, le résultat de l'analyse, que je cherchais, a disparu entièrement de l"archive, et l'il a été remplacé par un autre document non-authentique.


P.S. [2] Je dois vous prévenir qu'il est impossible de configurer mon fax pour qu"il affiche la bonne date. C'est pourquoi il faut tenir compte de la date du fax entrant, plutôt que de la date du fax sortant, ainsi que de la date indiquée par moi.


[Email version] Je veux également signaler que les en-têtes ont été omis dans le corps du courriel, pour des raisons de sécurité, mais que tous ces détails se trouvent dans le fichier joint

(en format Word).


In October 2016, I received the answer to my aforesaid letter: again, from the same M-me Trudeau, St. Mary's Hospital's ombudsman.


Her letter was composed on October 2, 2015: in violation of all norms on terms of the reply to patients' complaints. It shows that, probably, at first, no answer was planned at all:


(see below)


October 2, 2015


Mr. Lev Gunin BY E-MAIL


leog@total.net

Dear Mr. Gunin,


This letter serves to inform you that the concerns you brought to my attention in writing on April 29th, 2015 regarding your experience at St. Mary"s Hospital Center, have been looked into. I have performed an examination and in this task I sought the advice of Mr. Enzo Caprio, Supervisor of Blood Procurement Center and Corelab.


Firstly, I would like to apologize for the long delay in responding to your complaint.


COMPLAINT

In your complaint, you wrote that you came to St. Mary"s Hospital Center (SMHC) for a urinalysis and urine culture on March 2, 2015. You reported that you came to SMHC on April 10, 2015 to receive your lab results. You were told to collect a urine sample. As you had already given a urine sample on March 2, 2015, you refused to give another one to prevent a collision of 2 samples. A report dated April 10, 2015, mentioned that you "refused to provide a urine sample". You questioned what happened to the initial urine culture and you also requested help to obtain your test results.


ANALYSIS

Mr. Caprio acknowledged your complaint and met with Ms. Roberta Silvian, Assistant Chief Technologist of the Corelab. Ms. Silvian explained that you came to the blood team with a requisition for a CBC, urinalysis and urine culture on March 2, 2015. She acknowledged that a human mistake occurred. The urinalysis test was entered but the urine culture was omitted. This is why, when you came back in April to do the CBC test, you were asked to give a urine sample again.


Since you assumed the test was already done, you refused to give another sample.


I checked your medical record and noticed that a urine culture was done on July 16, 2015.


With regards to obtaining a copy of your test results, you made an official request to Medical Records accompanied by a completed authorization form. On May 29, 2015 your request was mailed to the following address:


(...)


CONCLUSION

An obvious breakdown in communication occurred and this is indeed unfortunate. Ms. Silvian identified that the error was an isolated human mistake. Unfortunately, the only way to rectify this situation was to supply another urine sample, which you did in July.


I regret the inconvenience that you experienced and I hope that the above will respond to your concerns.


Should you not be in agreement with these findings, you may exercise your rights of recourse at the Quebec Ombudsman"s office at 514 873-2032.

Sincerely,

Sarah-Beth Trudeau Ombudsman


The copy of e-mail (see above) (October 2, 2015) from St. Mary Hospital's ombudsman Sarah-Beth Trudeau. The attached to this letter file in the PDF format: her reply to my 2-nd complaint.


On October 11, 2015, I sent my reply to the letter of M-me Trudeau, St. Mary's ombudsman:


De Lev Gunin a Mme S.-B. Trudeau.

Bureau du commissariat aux plaintes

et à la qualité des services 3830,

avenue Lacombe, Bureau 1379

Montréal (Québec) H3T 1M5

Téléphone : 514 345-3511 poste 3301

Télécopieur : 514 734-2604

www.ciusss-ouestmtl.gouv.qc.ca)

[par E-mail leog@total.net]


Chère Mme Trudeau,


Merci pour votre enquête courageuse. L'éclaircissement de la vérité nous donne l'espoir d'un futur plus humain.

Malheureusement, ce n'est pas un incident isolé.

La perte des résultats de mes analyses ou de certaines pages est devenue une tendance sinistre. Il y a aussi une altération évidente quand, par exemple, l'échantillon avait une certaine couleur lors de la remise de l'analyse, mais qu'une autre couleur était décrite dans le rapport.

Même si je n'avais pas d'autres confirmations du susmentionné, excepté votre réponse, les autres cas se révèlent facilement par la vérification des copies des réquisits avec les résultats des analyses.

Ce n'est pas ma première plainte au sujet des incidents dangereux avec les résultats de mes analyses, et ce n'est pas seulement le cas avec le laboratoire de l'hôpital St.-Mary's. Un autre fait alarmant : le silence des employées du laboratoire, quand le 10 avril 2015, me demandant de reprendre le test, elles ne m'ont rien dit sur la perte de l'analyse du test précédent et, ont réagi à mes questions perplexes seulement en échangeant des coups d'œil significatifs.

Je dois ajouter que ma demande de me donner l'accès aux résultats des analyses concernait non seulement l'analyse particulière, mais chacun d'eux. Les employées des archives, en se référant au règlement stipulant que les patients ne peuvent pas consulter les documents en mains propres, me refusaient invariablement l'accès aux résultats de mes analyses.

Quant à l'enveloppe, m'étant expédiée le 29 mai 2015, je ne l'ai jamais reçue.

Veuillez me pardonner, mais je n'accepterai pas votre affirmation de ce qu'on pouvait " récupérer " la perte de l'information de la culture microbiologique.

" La répétition " d'une telle analyse après que l'infection ait disparue, n'a aucun sens. L'agent d'infection peut être révélé seulement pendant l'inflammation.

Ainsi, la perte de la partie de l'information de mon analyse du 2 mars 2015 est irréparable.

Encore une fois, merci pour votre aide.

Avec les meilleurs souhaits,

Lev Gunin

L'original de votre réponse ci-dessous :


The original of your answer follows below: (....)


................


Thus, in defiance of ethical, moral and humanitarian norms, laws, democratic principles and civil liberties, human rights, and a medical duty, ANY of my demands were ignored, including my demand to open for me an access to information.


It proves that systematic ruining of my health in medical institutions: it is not some "accidental" number of medical errors and "singular", "sporadic", or "isolated" failures, but a product of series of systematic, systemic, coordinated, and purposeful repressions, synchronized with police's intimidation and close surveillance, diversions, sabotage, administrative, social and economic pressure, ostracism and marginalization, de facto ban on my profession and on work in general, and persecutions in medical institutions.


But the MOST outraged and shocking: is that M-me Trudeau formally did not wish to recognize in general that the test from 2 Mar. - 10 Apr. 2015 - was lost in St. Mary"s Hospital, even if she de facto spoke about the loss, excusing it by a "human error", and, instead, laid the blame for its disappearance... on me... claiming that the lack of result (its loss) was possible... to "correct"... having made a repeated (another) analysis.


But any sane person (normal mentally) will tell that one analysis - it is one thing, and another one - is absolutely another thing. The goal of this test was to detect a particular infection (specific microorganism). An opportunity to detect a bacterial culture, responsible for infection, exists only during the acute state of the infectious disease, and after this stage the test is useless. Besides, I already was on antibiotics, which a fortiori eliminated any chance to detect the infection. So, any repeated test was useless.


The loss of the analysis M-me Trudeau excuses by the forgetfulness of employees who, allegedly, entered all other data, but "forgot" to enter the test for bacterial culture.


She completely ignores that - in the report's printout - there is lack of not only the test for microbiology culture, but also some other data (they probably "forgotten" to enter it, too?).


So cynically she names the "black" - "white", and "white" - "black".


................................


My communication with all these "controllers", ombudsman, "assistants", access to information's clerks - revealed just another horrific reality. So-called "human rights", "justice", "fairness", "égalité": are given to representatives of the hidden ruling clans of old aristocracy and elite of XVIII - beginning of XX centuries.


Such family names as Trudeau, Valois, Gauthier, Legault, Cox, and other: are surnames of these powerful dynasties, and these people - are members of such clans, or persons bearing the same surnames.


Who gave these protective functions to them? Who decided to take away protective functions from the hands of common people - and transfer them to actual feudal or their puppets? (In the medieval centuries, many of serfs carried names of their masters).


It proves ones again that the succession of power and richness is not defined by "democracy", "freedom", "equality", "personal qualities", or "knowledge and skills", but passes by bloodline. The whole demagogy about "democracy" is just a show window, but the reality is that this world is ruled by old feudal, by imposed by them non-proportional popular vote, by their own non-written laws, which are stronger and more powerful than those in the code of laws' volumes.


This is one of the reasons, which explain why I could not find Justice by definition.


They can not treat me fairly by definition, because I had carriage to dispute their abominable draconian power, their "license to kill".


____________


Lev Gunin


THE PUNITIVE HEALTH CARE

[HEALTH CARE AS A REPRESSIVE TOOL]


BOOK 5-9


THE UROLOGICAL DRAMA. PART 9. [May-November 2015]


CONTENT


Chapter 1.

Chapter 2.

Chapter 3.

Chapter 4.


__________


* * *


The whole text of the chronological events and medical documents (under the name of "The Punitive Health Care - (Health Care as a Repressive Tool)" is available for examination only on the basis of the following contract between the author and the reader:


I (THE READER) GIVE MY CONSENT THAT, BY CLICKING CORRESPONDING LINKS AND ACCESSING THE TEXT OF "THE PUNITIVE HEALTH CARE", I AUTOMATICALLY AGREE TO THE FOLLOWING PRELIMINARY CONDITIONS [FOR READING]:


-- I am (at least) 18 years old.


1. I (the reader) is undertaking (commit myself) not to distribute the text of "The Punitive Health Care - (Health Care as a Repressive Tool)" - entirely, or in fragments; not to copy medical documents; and not to share the text and images without author' permission.


2. I (the reader) understand that the confidential information, which is contained in this text, cannot be used for any other [than the reading (extraneous; secondary)] purposes and needs, for any researches, essays, stories, etc.


3. I (the reader) commit myself not to sneer at open ticklish personal information (which sharing was induced by circumstances), not to savor any medical, physiological, or anatomic details, and not to use this text as a reason for mockery and persecution.


4. I (the reader) am warned by the author that, except for a number of obviously immoral (by definition) doctors' and medical staff's actions, other decisions and acts described in this "confession" are not subjected to hasty moral assessment because a) only experts can judge finally about their justification and fairness; b) explanations and vindications of other party are necessary. We also do not know to what degree the doctors were under an influence and direct power of police, Ministry of Immigration, and other enforcement agencies, political organizations, groups and persons - with their own ideological, economic, and propaganda interests, - and to what degree this influence impacted on their diagnostic conclusions and assessments of patient's state of health. Many of the documentary confirmed facts incontestably demonstrate that author's ideological stand (who's opposing to younger generation's transformation into zombie-biorobots with mobile phones on shoulders instead of heads; to electronic totalitarianism with its prison-like total video surveillance; and to the tyrannical political censorship) played nearly a major role in enraging the authorities and triggering the persecutions.


5. I (the reader) am warned that the author sees the main cause of the most dramatic (for him) events in the fact that the enforcement agencies and interested persons and groups managed to present him to the medical community as an individual incapable to evaluate his health condition objectively; as a health-consciousan (or hypochondriac); an extremist; a troublemaker; an individual obsessed with panic and alarm patterns; as a person, who is making unreal demands to the system of medical care - concerning his - allegedly - pseudo-maladies and exaggerated gravity of trivial indispositions. This smear campaign of defamation, scurrilous libel, and wicked calumny made impossible receiving an adequate medical care (and sometimes any medical help at all), and led to health undermining, numerous diseases, incidents, and unnecessary sufferings. Doctors also considered difficult to believe in continuous (not connected with each other) illnesses, with an interval of 4-7 days, sometimes rolling at the same time: as tsunami. They refused to believe in these sequences of illnesses' painful course, danger, and significance. This chronicle disproves such a prejudiced opinion, producing an incontestable evidence.


6. I (the reader) am informed that all negative remarks, characteristics, and facts' assessments belong only to the portrayal of criminal groups, extremists, and carriers of anti-humanistic, racist, and totalitarian ideology, but do not contain groundless generalizations and negative assessment of any country, ethnic group, or religion. The author is categorically against dismantling of any of the existing states, and against restrictions of the rights of religious congregations of any faith.


7. I (the reader) am informed that this edition partially presents the previous 2017 edition without any changes, and, thus, may not correspond to later view and opinions.


8. I (the English reader) am informed that some parts of the following English text of "The Punitive Health Care" - were translated from Polish, Russian, or French originals, and may contain primitive language, double interpretation, or puzzled meaning. Such confusing fragments should be compared with their originals in Polish and Russian languages (author's native languages) [2016-2017]; all controversial points must be resolved through such a comparison.


9. In the very last moment of this edition's make-up (April 2023), the author came across a description of so-called Havana-syndrome, and found same symptoms and complications, which he experienced when was attacked by an unknown remote weapon (3 Nov. 2005, 7 Jan. 2013, and 21 June 2016), and developed symptoms of post-microwave irradiation.


_________


CHAPTER 1.


2015.


2015, MAY


___________________

___________________


May 1, 2015.


On May 1, 2015, I received (in the pharmacy) Betaderm, prescribed by Dr. Marie St. Jacques:


Pharmaceutical printout and prescription (see below):


If all doctors would act so operatively and in good time (as Dr. St. Jacques), I would have no health problems, could live longer, and could turn for medical help 20 times less.


May 5, 2015.

A rendezvous with Dr. Krasny was appointed to me for Tuesday, May 5, 2015, but his secretary cancelled this rendezvous, under the pretext that he soon retires. However, Dr. Krasny retires only at the end of December, 2015, and, thus, actually he, in violation of the law, unilaterally excluded me from the list of his patients.


His secretary said that I have to find myself another rheumatologist...


Dr. Krasny, who was my rheumatologist more than 10 years, treated me kindly, paid me enough attention. He prescribed requisitions on numerous tests, exams, and analyses, which could help to choose an adequate treatment and to detect the true cause of arthritis. He - generally - in due time - prescribed anti-inflammatory, when other doctors refused it, and it prevented further development and advance of arthritis and deformation of bones and joints.


However, after 2007 (namely, in 2007 I was hit by the car, and - in St. Mary's emergency department - they refused ultrasound of the damaged blood vessels, medical treatment, etc., and the first serious conflict with McGill medical institutions started to roll out), he - more and more often - began to refuse anti-inflammatory, which I had to "beaten out" "with fight".


After 2007, he also stopped actively investigate the reasons, which generated arthritis attacks, and never produced any diagnosis.


Situationally, and judging by facts, there was a palpable link between the incident with the car, which hit me, plus, the conflict in St. Mary's ER (when I was denied ANY medical help in connection with my serious injuries) - and Dr. Krasny's less friendly stand.


So, the rapid changes in his attitude to me, was - seemingly - caused by that conflict.


If so, Dr. Krasny's cooling relations with me must be explained by purely political reasons.


During the period from 2007 until the end of 2014, the arthritis did not torment me as in the previous next years, or I managed to cope with it using so-called folk remedies.


The lack of any diagnosis was a serious problem. When I tried to find out from Dr. Krasny the name of my arthritic illness, the type of arthritis; if it is rheumatism, adjournment of salts, crystallization, or something else: the answer was "not". I repeatedly posed the same question uncountable times, but Dr. Krasny kept silence. I suggested to him that the cause of arthritis is connected to innumerous urological infections, which are the main source of all other problems of my health, and are the most probable cause of exacerbations of arthritis, and can destroy my health completely.


And, because Dr. Jiri Krasny himself never named any diagnosis, I tried to get from him a referral to immunologist, endocrinologist, infectologist, and to other specialists, who could "crack" this "mystery".


First of all, I wanted a professional medical assessment of the harm, which the chronic infection is inflicting to my health, and this could help me to obtain right remedies or a referral to an appropriate urological surgery (if worst comes to worst). But I did not receive from Dr. Krasny even an answer to my request.


When I, at last, got to an infectologist, on referral of doctor Rohan, instead of concentrating on treatment plan, all efforts of Dr. Semret were concentrated on illegal psychiatric examination and on attempts to present me as a danger to society and as mentally unhealthy person.


I repeatedly asked Dr. Krasny how to define what - after all - calls the arthritic disease in me, and from what the aggravations coming from: but he only waved away.


It is one of the main reasons, which was forcing me to pass numerous unhealthy x-ray inspections. Other reasons: doctors' refusals to prescribe anti-inflammatory, which I could receive only with an x-ray in hands; otherwise, I would refuse most of the X-rays.


When I was sure that the problem with both shoulder joints is a calcifying tendinitis, and knew that an x-ray will hardly show it, I asked a referral to ultrasonography, but I was answered: at first X-ray, then ultrasound, rules are that!


So, I had to be irradiated with X-ray again - instead of just undergoing ultrasonography. And some doctors used X-ray as a pretext to refuse treatment. They said: if there is no X-ray - there is no treatment (physical therapy, either anti-inflammatory, or cortisone injections). And, when the result of X-ray was negative, they - besides - used it as a pretext for refusal of treatment.


Many facts indicate that some doctors or even entire medical institutions are in collusion with radiologists, who - on their pointer - assess an X-ray as "normal", whereas actually it showed obvious pathologies.


Thus, my health was affected not only by the fact of refused treatment - when it was absolutely necessary, but also because I was forced to give my conceit to unnecessary and too numerous x-ray exams, or even had to demand them myself: because - otherwise - I could not receive any medical help, treatment, and diagnosis. It concerns not only rheumatology and arthritis, but also many other health problems (so, instead of an echocardiogram, or so-called "stress"-cardiogram, which I demanded, I was sent to a simple cardiogram and X-ray of heart; etc.).


And all this is a consequence of the predatory privatization of health sector, which actually pulled out all interiors at a healthy organism of public universal free healthcare.


There is a sabotage of medical services of governmental programs (to those, who are not covered by private health insurance) at all levels: from doctors to laboratories; from offices of physical therapy and radiology - to any other medical procedure.


Human life and human health is valuing "zero" ("0"): the main thing - is money, money, money! enrichment and satisfaction of grasping, and deglutitory reflexes.


On my concern about the frequency of x-ray exams, doctors answered that the modern medical X-ray apparatus "are absolutely harmless" and that the only "harmful" scans: these are pictures of teeth at dentists and the computerized tomography (CT-scan).


In radiologies, they reacted to my concern by asking - how many times for the last half a year I passed the X-rays, but I had an impression that my answer concerned them a little, and changed a little.


If the requisitions on laboratory analyses, on ultrasonography, medications' prescriptions, etc. - most often must be "beat out" with fight, then the X-rays: the only thing, which Canadian doctors willingly - and even with great pleasure - channelize.


The earlier a needy patient will die - the quicker expenditure for his treatment will terminate.


But, I repeat, unlike many other Canadian doctors, Dr. Krasny - after all - was a person, who still had what we (in the old manner) call "conscience".


There are 3 main problems, which arose with Dr. Krasny; they are

1) lack of any diagnosis (i.e. he never answered my question);

2) an illegal psychiatric (or some other) evaluation, which was carried out with the consent of Dr. Krasny (but not in his office) [a young doctor, who called himself Dr. Krasny's "assistant", brought me to another room, where ordered to undress to pants, for some reasons pottered about in my head of heir, touched my stomach, looked into my mouth and ears, and carried out other strange manipulations; at the same time, he managed to make at me an impression that if I refuse his strange "survey", I will not see Dr. Krasny (and I had - by then - severe pain, and needed to see the doctor)]; and

3) the situation, which developed, when the Royal Victoria Hospital was temporarily "moved" to the premises of MGH (when my whole medical file gone "missing"; when Dr. Krasny refused anti-inflammatory (possibly - because it was already refused by Dr. Rohan); when Dr. Krasny refused wrist joint's ultrasound, and, instead, directed me to X-ray; etc.).


And, at last (in 2015), after a saga with inflammation and deformation of the wrist joint, being followed by tendinosis, tenovitis, and other consequences - inhuman, intolerable pain was completely ignored by all doctors - including Dr. Krasny, who did not advise anything, did not prescribe pain killers, nor anti-inflammatory, nor local medications (ointment, etc.), nor cortisone injections; did not administrated a course of physical therapy, and just expelled me from his patients.


Was Dr. Krasny accurate, when he doubted my complains about an intolerable - inhuman! - pain in the joints, linking sinews, and muscles; not trusting my claims that the whole wrist is inflamed? Were other several doctors (whom I visited in this period) right, claiming that all problems with my left wrist - are, allegedly, a product of my "morbid imagination"? Let's ask the ultrasound (March 24, 2018) scan about the presence or lack of problems (see below):


LEFT WRIST ULTRASOUND:

CLINICAL INDICATIONS: Left ulnar-sided wrist pain.

FINDINGS: There is focal longitudinal split tear at the extensor carpi ulnaris tendon with background of tendinosis and minimal surrounding fluid in keeping with tenosynovitis. The other extensor compartments are normal. No tendon tear is identified. There is no joint effusion. No flexor tendon abnormality is identified.

CONCLUSION: The imaging features are in keeping with extensor carpi ulnaris focal split tear with background of tendinosis and minimal tenosy novitis.


The last appointment slip on appointment with Dr. Krasny for May 5, 2015 (see above).


Envelope (see above), in which came - instead of rendezvous for May 5, 2015, with doctor Krasny - a paper-reference to other rheumatologist and a list of other rheumatologists' data.


A reference (appointment) to other rheumatologist, allegedly, in connection with Dr. Krasny's retirement though he had yet nearly a year BEFORE his real retirement. This paper practically confirmed the cancellation of the rendezvous, which was earlier appointed to May 5, 2015, and it means that Dr. Krasny actually refused to see me anymore as his patient. At the left - the date of the last exam by the rheumatologist (Dr. Krasny) is specified: April 21, 2015.


Not only the ultrasound's report in March 2018 (given above) confirmed that - in 2015 - I suffered from intolerable pain, and that I had all reasons to worry about the wrist joint, about its functionality, and that I was forced to pester doctors and medical institutions not due to my alleged "exaggeration" of health problems and "excessive sensitivity", but due to a real problem.


I already provided photos of the inflamed, deformed and reddened in April 2015 joint in the previous sections of this chronicle.


Here I repeatedly present 2 of them (see below):


On April 24, 2015 (when I was subjected to a mockery in Montreal General Hospital's emergency department and to illegal psychiatric examination, which questioned my adequate assessment of the wrist's inflammation and pain - the picture was much more terrifying.


May 8, 2015


On May 8, 2015 - a morning trip to Jeanne Talon hospital for the sake of the next attempt to recover the result of the electromagnetic scan (MRI) (2013), which was considered "missing".


On my way: annoying police escorting and surveillance, with participation of "civil" cars.

I was exposed to such a massive and intimidating shadowing only few times.

I - probably - managed to obtain this MRI report at the latest moment, in a minute before it was going to be withdrawn finally. It - as well as the wrist ultrasound - confirmed that the arthritic problems with joints: not mine "sick imagination", but real arthritis, which - logically - had to be medically treated, but not be "explained" by patient's "sick imagination".


May 21, 2015

At the end of May 2015, it became necessary to buy the Hydrocortisone cream again:


This hydrocortisone cream was needed due to new dermatological problems in the end of May - first half of June 2015.


May 22, 2015

On May 22, 2015, I sent a letter to Police Station Nr. 15. The description of uncountable interceptions, stoppings, and interrogations by police; police escorts; hails from police cars; demonstrative police escorting; demonstrative police surveillance; blocking of my way by police cars and motorcycles, and pedestrian police squads; and of other similar incidents (all together - hundreds of cases) - was provided in this letter-declaration (complain). In the same letter, I demanded the answers for what reasons the police accompany me from metro stations or a bus stop to a hospital, policlinic, or some other medical institution, where I go. I never received any reply to this complain.


JUNE, 2015.


June 4, 2015

In the morning, I went to a walk-in clinic, where I was examined again by the same doctor, whom I most often get on reception.


That time, I was refused a referral for another test on hyperuricemia.


June 8-9, 2015:

Internet did not work in the afternoon: during around 8 hours. Systematic disconnections of our Telephone-Internet line happen systematically, every few days, since 1990-s, and compensation is always refused. It is one of examples of the fact that police, medical and administrative terror are interconnected and coordinated.


THIS intensified wave of Internet interruptions began AT ONCE after sending the complaint to the ombudsman of McGill medical institutions.


When - in the evening on June 8, 2015 - Internet started to function again, it turned out that there is no access to my e-mail box ("the user name or the password are incorrect").


On June 9, 2015, from 6:00 to 9:20 (in the morning) (despite my calls to the Internet company) my email access did not work, and was restored only at 9:20.


June 10, 2015

On June 10, 2015, I sent a letter to McGill medical institutions' ombudsman. Its content, explanation, and analysis - are already described in this series of the chronicle (see under April 24, 2015). (To: MGH Ombudsman, ombudsman@much.mcgill.ca, etc.; 4 pages of the document are photocopies and also the text transferred to a digital format).


June 16, 2015

Doctor Lori Kahwajian from the walk-in clinic prescribed for me Naproxen, refused by other doctors (June 4, 2015). Dr. Kahwadjian proved to be a wonderful person.


June 5 was Friday, and, due to circumstances, I was not able to visit the pharmacy. On Saturday-Sunday the pharmacy was closed (or I thought so), and I came to pharmacy only on June 8, 2015. However, at this time worked the same woman, who already blocked me some medications few times, and I was ready for anything. That's why I gave her not the original prescription, but its copy. She did not notice it at first (or I was mistaken), and said that, before giving me out the medication, she has to contact my family doctor, which could take place only tomorrow. I told her that not my family doctor prescribed this medication, but she said that going to contact my family doctor anyways.


During the following days, I came to pharmacy few times, to be sure that I came not during this "bad" pharmacist shift, and, also, I planned to visit the pharmacy together with my wife.


So, I bought this anti-inflammatory drug on Dr. Kahwajian prescription only on June 16, 2015.


The prescription on anti-inflammatory drug Naproxen written on June 4, 2015, by doctor Lori (Laurie) Kahwajian. (See above)


See above: Naproxen, instructions, received in the pharmacy on 16 June, 2015.


CHAPTER 2.


June 18, 2015

Approximately on June 18, 2015, the confirmation that my letter was received - arrived from McGill medical institutions' ombudsman; in response of my complaint sent on June 10, 2015 and - repeatedly - on June 16, 2015. (See the image below)


June 19, 2015

The fax sent to the rheumatologist on June 19, 2015 after since April 24, 2015 - despite the direction from doctor Krasny and on discharge from emergency department from which it was clear that my visit to the rheumatologist demands urgency - I could not receive not only dates on appointment, but in general any answer. (See below)


On the same day (19 Jun. 2015), I sent a fax to the physiotherapy department. (See below)


I called round and sent faxes to a number of rheumatologists from the list, with the indication of urgency and the copy of appointments from Ambulance, but, despite this, from April to September had no the rheumatologist, and, only in August, 2015, got on reception to doctor Anna Hananyan.


July, 3, 2015

July 3, 2015: X-ray of the left wrist joint. See X-ray's report below:


It obviously downgrades left wrist's problems, deliberately omitting the most serious deformations. Another inexplicable artefact is the requisition for this x-ray exam, signed by Dr. Lori Kahwajian from Metro-Medic walk-in clinic. She marked the date as 15 Jun. 2015. It is impossible that I passed this X-Ray almost 1 month after the appointment with her. Normally, due to cooperation between Metro-Medic and VM Med, an appointment in the clinic and x-ray belong to the same day. My memory does not keep any explanation. (See below)


July, 7, 2015.

On July 7, 2015, around 22.15 - 2 people threatened me with bicycles' collision, one of them intentionally went on my strip towards me, scoffing. It was before I reached the descent under the railway bridge opposite to Atwater Market coming back home.


JULY - AUGUST, 2015.


July 21, 2015

On July 21, 2015, I sent - by fax - my declaration to the St. Mary Hospital's ombudsman, in one more attempt to find the truth:


From: Lev Gunin

(address, tel., fax)


To: Sarah-Beth Trudeau

Office: Room 1379 - Pavilion A

Telephone: (514) 734-2618

Fax: (514) 734-2636

Email: sarah-beth.trudeau.chsm@ssss.gouv.qc.ca


DECLARATION

I am an ordinary person, just like you; not a threat to any security; not a leak of any classified information. However, it is very possible that faced many threats to my health and life because some criminal enforcement bodies are not obliged to justify such operations any more. There is no red tape for them; no governments' / citizens' control.


If some of life-threatening and health-threatening events were or could be purely coincidental, then why the police and McGill's Access Information MUHC left my official declarations unanswered, while some doctors sabotaged medical help in an assumption that these events might be planned by their chiefs, or foreign "friendly services".


I live under everyday surveillance; police and other agencies are tracking down my every move. When there is a suspicion that I noticed them or tried to escape, then the policemen are sent to show themselves up.


Their patrol cars stopped, interrogated, and searched me uncounted times. The whole history of police intimidation is well documented, with the patrol cars' board numbers, precise time and place of arrests and interrogations, and sometimes policemen names. However, I never laid an official complaint. All police officers that used to stop and interrogate me have turned to be nice people, polite and responsible. They spoke French, if I did, or English, if I did. There is no reason to accuse them of any wrongdoing. It is not their fault that they were sent to intimidate me. Some doctors (like Dr. Herskowitz, or Dr. Semret) or nurse (like Mrs. Priestley) manifested an unjustified and unprovoked hostility towards me, while the policemen were always polite and sympathizing. I used to submit friendly letters to heads of 2 police departments, asking them about confidential investigation. The letters were left unanswered, and - possibly - were intercepted. I never made an official judicial complaint about doctors and medical institution; I am not after vengeance. I only want to know the truth.


Since January 1, 2001 (the year of 9/11), I've got uncounted infections and other rare sickness. This began right after Immigrations' Health Services' attempt to put me by force into the Infectious Diseases Unit under falsified (forged) tuberculosis records. Since then, I am facing - literally every week - UNRELATED illnesses (mostly infectious), when my immune system is not compromised.


When I show up (at Emergency Rooms, or clinics, or by family medicine doctors) with traumas after attacks of "hooligans", or car hits, or other incidents, or with an acute infection: I am denied referrals to most simple diagnostics procedures. In the same time, when all the traumas healed, or an acute period is over: then SOMETIMES I'm directed for blood / urine, or other tests with no delay. The only explanation is that there is a hidden sabotage of treatment and diagnostic procedures.


When I was kicked out of the Emergency Rooms with untreated open wounds, cracks in the bones, or damaged blood vessels, I had to learn how to diagnose and treat myself.


I want to know why police is escorting me (or intercepts my way) from the Metro or bus stop, or from the car - to St.-Mary's hospital or any medical building at Cote-des-Neiges around St.-Mary's and the neighbor hospital, on whose request, and by whose initiative. I would also like ti know, how the police know about my every current medical appointment, and what access have the enforcement agencies to my medical files.


In support of my declaration, I can provide an excerpt from the chronicle, with photos of police cars escorting me to medical institutions, and a drone, which made circles over my head near the college's stadium near St.-Mary's (possibly: the same drone that was flying 2 times against the windows of my apartment).


I see it as an extension and expansion of criminal drones' operations, with extrajudicial killings, and of common sick climate of total surveillance and profiling. I have no doubts that such a situation is a threat for any person's security and peaceful life at any part of the world.

_____________________________________


Yours truly,

Lev Gunin, July, 21, 2015.


July 13, 2015

On July 13, 2015, hands' / legs' fingers began to swell up and redden again. After a morning walk, at 7:30, palms and fingers were "burning with fire", at the same time causing terrible itching.


Left image: Thumb of the left hand in the morning; July 13, 2015. Lump and reddening is visible (on the periphery of the picture - skin of almost normal color). Right image: The picture from other foreshortening. Same thumb of the left hand in the morning, July 13, 2015. Here the swelling and reddening are visible, too.


On the same day, by the evening, literally whole "cones" on the top part of legs and in forearms muscles were emerging and vanished. These "cones" had a bright red color, and also "burned with fire", causing pain and itching. All this occurred against the background of an ongoing "urological" dermatosis, which did not pass more than 2 weeks.


July 14, 2015.

On Tuesday, July 14, 2015, at 8 o'clock in the morning, I had an appointment with the physiotherapist, Miss Pearl Zaltzman, who appeared to be a wonderful person. Obviously, that woman is from a "good" family; apparently, her parents were ones from the intellectuals.


2 days prior to this appointment with the physiotherapist, the next urological aggravation, with "usual" symptoms has an effect. On the eve of the visit to physiotherapist, literally in the evening of the previous day, it was complicated by hematuria (bright red color), burning and other unpleasant feelings in a bladder.


At night, I did not go to ER, and decided to phone - and cancel tomorrow's morning meeting with the physiotherapist, and, instead, to visit a walk-in clinic. But - as no discomfort bothered me in the morning, - I decided to glance after all to the physiotherapist, to explain - what happened, and to run from there - at once - to the clinic. The conscience did not allow me to cancel the appointment on the same day.


Despite yesterday's hematuria with gripes in a bladder, the mood and health was excellent, but it was spoiled by police and spy shadowing.


I went to Hôpital General de Montréal by Metro, and while waited for the train at the station, a fleshy maiden - by sight 29 y.o. - openly photographed me with a defiant look (perhaps, provoking: if such was her "party task").


When I went out of the Metro at Guy Concordia's stations, the police car 25-4 was placed opposite to the exit.


Almost without efforts and without having been out of breath, I climbed a lengthy (several blocks) and very steep slope to the hospital; on the second half practically running because mistakenly considered that I am late.


I entered the hospital building through the "hidden" side entrance (near the emergency department), which very few people "guess". Even if patients and other visitors of notice this door, they steadily take it for an entrance only for personnel, inaccessible for strangers. But, actually, there are no prohibitive inscriptions.


Despite my intention to declare that I have an urgent medical problem, and "to disappear" at once, as the physiotherapist got down to business with such enthusiasm and with such desire to help me that I should have no heart and conscience to interrupt her, stayed there - till approximately 9:30 in the morning. Besides, I should manage to pass doctor's exams in the walk-in policlinic before younger daughter's departure for study, and my wife's departure to our oldest daughter.


Then I was detained again by the line to the secretary for record on the following rendezvous, and - only after that - could go home or to policlinic. (And I already thought - whether it is worth going on doctors and to waste time since I felt now normally).


The morning was solar and not hot, and it was possible to enjoy summer afternoon, the beauty of the city (more true, what was left from the city of Montreal), so, I doubly had no wish to walk on doctors again.


I put - at first - the returned by the secretary plastic medical and hospital cards in the shirt's breast pocket, but - when I approached the wooden ladder breaking down from the road entrance to hospital, which is laid over by noble stone plates leading to the sidewalk of the street, - I decided to move the cards to a bag or to the trouser pocket.


Instinctively, I felt no wish to do it at presence and at surroundings of the walking to the stairs ladder and on the stairways people. Something was "not OK", something held me, but I - contrary to my intuition - decided to shift cards at that moment.


I was in good shape, easily ran across the road, and literally ran down hopping when felt unpleasant sensation in the bladder and sudden weakness accompanied by cold sweat. "Here we arrived", - rushed in my head.


Despondency captured me from the fact that it is necessary to trudge to the policlinic.


I decided to prepare my medical card in advance, having shifted it in a closer pocket, but did not grope either medical card, or the hospital card anywhere. I walked on all the pockets, glanced in the bag: not a sign anywhere. Inside the street (moreover, under a fixed eye of a spy), I had no wish to rummage on clothes, and decided to return back home, and - there - to search myself carefully: what if the cards suddenly sit somewhere?


But, before going home, I returned back, to the hospital, going literally along "the trace in a trace" of my steps from there, carefully examined the stairs, on which I went down from the hospital buildings to the street: nor one, nor another card did not roll anywhere. I checked everywhere where it was only possible, even on a carriageway - where I ran across the street: nothing. Who managed to pick up or rather to grab my plastic cards - to who needs them and what for? You can do nothing with them. Only the owner can use them. I only returned in vain, risking to injure the kidneys: instead to rush to a toilet as soon as possible.


Almost near the entrance to my house, there was a car without a license plate number, such as they began to use recently more often for shadowing me.


At home, I shook out all the content of my bag, and emptied all my pockets. The cards were not there.


And here some frightening feelings in the stomach started over to disturb me again. Not a sharp pain, not gripes, not colic, but something very unpleasant and bad. I rushed to the toilet: full toilet bowl of blood. Here I outright got a fright. But where to run? They will not accept me without a medical card anywhere.


After all, I went to the walk-in clinic, and there told that I forgot my medical card at home. But I was not accepted. There I learned that Dr. Lori Kahwajian left somewhere, and does not work here anymore. She even left Montreal. It was the next bad news. And it turned out that nearly a half staff of best doctors whom I most often saw here whether absolutely unexpectedly and unjustly retired, whether disappeared somewhere.


From this policlinic, I climbed again up Guy Street, which - from Sherbrook - already becomes Cote-des-Neiges (Snowy Way).


Again in all eyes I watched the step and rummaged around each step of the stairgates. The cards were not there.


When - again - I came back home, I (again) felt "scraping" in the stomach, and - again - the toilet was full of blood. Sharp pain immediately disappeared seconds before and after toilet.


Then I called Régie de l'assurance Maladie du Québec, but - as far as I understood, - by phone this issue could not be resolved in one day. Coins for Metro or bus have ended at me, and walking there seemed not possible now (30-40 minutes on foot - by fast pace); I hesitated to walk such a distance in my condition, as well as by bicycle (especially, on abrupt hillsides from the "lower" city to the "top").


And, after all, I scrap up together enough coins to reach Régis de l'assurance Maladie du Québec, but when I left home to the bus stop, the Metro police car 58-419 approached there with a whole program of worked through intimidation, and nothing remained but to return back home.


Then I went to the local policlinic of my area, but not in the closest one, but in that that is situated behind the railroad and the park.


They treated me very friendly and compassionately. However, it could take up to 2-3 days if administrating the procedure of restoring the medical card through them, and without the card - their doctor could not assess my health problems.


I had to disturb my younger daughter, who specially came back home earlier, and brought me to Régie de l'assurance Maladie du Québec, where we got minutes before the closure, and I managed to receive a paper document of the temporary public (governmental) health insurance. From there, my daughter took me to the emergency department of the French hospital Notre Dame.


The treatment in this hospital was normal, human.


Having learned that I came to this ER for the first time, everything was explained to me very detailed, patiently and carefully, without creating absolutely any problems. An impression (maybe, wrong) was made that the personnel do not speak English at all, and - when an English-speaking patient showed up, a single French-speaking nurse, doctor, or social worker, who could express in good English, was called especially for him.


As it became clear, my French is rather good, and I communicated with the medical personnel without problems (even better than in other languages, because on all other languages (including Russian) I am extremely verbose, which causes misunderstanding and inconveniences, only (for some reasons) in German and in French I express myself laconically.


I passed the triage nurse quickly enough, and the urine test was administrated quickly, which processing has to take more than one hour.


I was held exactly as long as it was needed for a "preliminary" lab tests result.


Nobody clung to me in the waiting room, no security guards or security services agents mocked over me. In other words, a striking contrast between what always happened in English hospitals (except for events in St. Mary Hospital's ER on June 13-14, 2014, when I addressed to the hospital with a purulent abscess on my back, and when the whole stationary compartment of the emergency department was CLOSED ON REPAIR, and EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT was TEMPORARILY placed in the East Wing, having invited all NEW YOUNG DOCTORS) - and, now - in Notre Dame hospital, was obvious.


But even here it was not without the ominous moments.


When I collected the sample, and brought it to a window of the "internal" office (where medical documents, prescriptions, etc., were accepted or issued, and where tests were received), one of the nurses (either a laboratorian, or a technical worker) - on my question of how to learn about the result on infection (microbiological culture) - broke out in a real abuse, raising her voice and being broken almost on shout. She cried out almost hysterically that this supposedly not my business, but business of doctors, and that "others" should not "stick the nose where it does not follow". Well, whether the irritation of those, who were enraged by my address to an "alternative" (and, besides, French) hospital was reflected in her hail?! Or she was so irritated because already received an order to alter and partially sabotage the test?


It became clear that the result of this analysis will be forged as well, and even if the contagium will be found, it will not be included in the printout. So it happened.


Having collected a sample, I photographed it. (For esthetic reasons, I do not provide this photo). It was of blood-red (not bright-red, but dark-red) shade. When I saw the copy of the analysis, sample's color was specified there as "sitrin" (lemon; as it is necessary to understand: a light yellow shade), i.e. - absolutely normal. This only already deprives the result-report of the minimal trust.


The doctor turned out to be austere, attentive, responsible, and did everything necessary in similar cases, not only having prescribed antibiotics, but having even ordered that I was given 1 tablet immediately (i.e. that the antibiotic began to work before the morning, when I am able to get all packing in a pharmacy). (What striking contrast to behavior of Dr. Morris, to whose office I used to come with plentiful bleeding, but did not receive from him not only antibiotics, but even a requisition for a urine test!).


But here - also - it was not without the upsetting details.


So, I at once recognized this doctor, who used to examine me and even my late mother in an emergency department whether Hôtel-Dieu, whether Royal Victoria. Whether it is possible (against the background of all intrigues) to believe that I "accidentally" got in different hospitals to the same doctor?


When I received (in the medical archive) the copies of documents from ER for July 14, 2015, it became clear that the name and surname of this doctor indicates his Jewish Sephardic origin. However, this person is not looking as a Jew at all, and, especially, as a Sephardic Jew: neither on manners and behavior, nor on his look and mimicry, neither on gesticulation, nor on conversation, nor on his appearance. Considering all my bitter experience in other hospitals, where I was examined by some doctors, and - in medical documents (as it appeared) - it was specified that the assessment was performed by others, it was possible to assume that here, too, the documents "lie", but, in this situation - almost for certain it is not, and the "true" doctor is specified.


Anyway, my arrival to a "new" hospital (where I was for the 1-st time) - where I "accidentally" get on exams to 1) the doctor already familiar to me; 2) to the doctor and; 3) to a female staffer who appended her digital "signature" - with characteristic names - it is symptomatic.


Certainly, it does not mean at all that the mentioned staff of this hospital "is surely involved" in something bad and worked on someone's pointer. On the contrary, exactly THIS doctor acted faultlessly, both from professional, and from the human point of view. If ALL doctors - to whom I got in the past - acted the same as him, then - in 2001 - I would get rid of a urological infection for certain at once, and it would not turn my further existence into a nightmare, and would not lead to the damage of several organs, numerous complications and chronic illnesses.


One more guarding detail.


When I asked this doctor (definitely - a urologist) if I can be his permanent patient, he asked if I - presently - have a urologist who follows me on a constant basis, and I answered "yes". In that case, said the doctor, I have to continue visiting Dr. Morris because "he is my doctor". But I did not tell the name of the urologist, right?! Even when I started pleading to this doctor, saying that, by some reasons, Dr. Morris will bring me to a verge of tragedy, and begging to save my life, he replied that I am "allowed" to be treated "only by Dr. Morris".


So, again, my new attempt to free myself from Dr. Morris, becoming a patient of another Montreal urologist - failed.


CHAPTER 3.


As usual, the persistent surveillance demonstrated an obvious coordination, signifying about coordination of actions between "services" and corrupted health workers:


Silvery color Hyundai car "escorted" me to the physiotherapist, and the registration plate license number of that car flashed a particular kind of governmental cars, often assigned to "special services'" agencies. July 14, 2015. (See above)


2 more cars, which - potentially - could be used for shadowing in the early morning of July 14, 2015 (on my way to the physiotherapist). (See above)


Police car (20... or 28-4?) stationed at the opposite to the exit from Metro side. July 14, 2015, about 7:25 a.m. (on my way to physical therapy in Montreal General Hospital). (See above)


Police car 26-15; 14 of July, 2015 (stationed in the passage, which I used to reach the "hidden" entrance to the hospital building). (See above)


Another probable surveillance participant, dark blue BMW "jeep", stopped few times near the pavement (to yield me ahead), and pursued me after (on my way from physiotherapist to policlinic). This BMW car also had such a type of the registration license plate number, which cars used for shadowing often have. July 14, 2015. (See above)


The scheme (drawing) of the wrist orthopedic support, which I copied at physiotherapist's office on July 14, 2015, and then independently made at home with an acceptable quality. (See above)


Before my attempt to find the lost plastic cards on the external stairs from the hospital to the street, the same "chicken" car "flew by" several times. July 14, 2015. (See above)


A white old Pontiac without the registration license plate number was stationed near my home. An "unbelievable" (huge) number of "accidental" cars without the registration license plate numbers "flashing" in my path, or being "on duty" near my home - even without temporary paper sticker with number on the back glass - is a food for thought (obviously, such cars can be selected as preferable tools for police and secret services, used for shadowing). It is clear: if there is no registration number - there are no traces to whose, who used this car, and there is no need in replaceable ("false") registration numbers. And - even if an official investigation would be launched, it would be much more difficult to find out anything on the bases of my photos and descriptions... Proceeding from circumstances on June 14, 2015, it is very probable that this car - equipped with a hidden camera - was parked near my home at this particular time and spot not accidentally. (See above)


When I, after all, "scraped up" few coins to reach (by bus) the Régie de l'assurans maladie, and left home to the bus stop (July 14, 2015), the Metro police car 58-419 STM (white Ford FGW9077) - very slowly and defiantly - approached there. 2 sitting inside police officers showed a special interest to my modest person. When I, in view of such intimidation, left the bus stop and went to the metro station (that on the following corner), this police car turned around, and slowly (with pedestrian's speed) went after me, escorting. Then I, expecting a next provocation and new troubles, was forced to come back home, because could not take a risk in my present health condition, if becoming a detainee of police. If that or those, who set the police after me, knew about my present acute health condition, it was an obvious attempt not to allow me to address for medical help, and - in that case - it constitutes an attempt at my health or life. (See above)


Left image (July 14, 2015): When I went to local policlinic, white Honda car ("jeep", FHE6939) appeared several times "on horizon". And, each its "appearance" occurred not "just" somewhere, but at key points: on a crossing with a big street; under the bridge, etc. It is possible that it happened accidently, but also the opposite is not excluded. Especially as this car's registration number is typical for such state (governmental) series, which also can be used by the intelligence agencies quite often. Right image: On my way to the local policlinic, the Technics driving school car (Toyota, FJP2960) also busily "grazed". For several years, cars of this driving school (or camouflaged under it), or "chicken" cars - are most often "monitored" me. No doubts that such particular cars are most suitable for police surveillance: all of them look the same; they are unnoticeable; suspecting such cars is not expected.


At key point on my way to local policlinic, was placed another police car - SPVM 164-013238, white Dodge "jeep" Journey FHS4302), - more likely: equipped with a surveillance camera.


Now, we will analyze the digital copies of the documents from Notre Dame Hospital's emergency department (evening, July 14, 2015) (it should be noted that some documents are omitted (skipped) since, in connection with the nature of the disease, have especially confidential character and cannot be brought for ethical reasons; the numbering of documents - therefore - is free, but based on chronology):


Number 1. July 14, 2015. Without any knowledge of specific bureaucratic regulations and procedures of Notre Dame Hospital, it is unclear - why this document has a digital ("computer") signature of some certain Myriam Cool Charest (it is also unclear, "Cool Charest" is her double surname, or a pseudonym), and below there is a hand-ink signature of Dr. Samuel Shamir Belhaemi.


Number 2. July 14, 2015. It is noted that in total I spent 5 and a half hours in this hospital, from 16:31 till 22:06. In this document, the reason of my address to emergency department, symptoms, and all the rest - is correct, but the tone of the lines - filled by the triage nurse - is a matter of concern. The expressions like "according to the patient" (repeated twice), or, "according to him", are overused - as though someone wised up the triage nurse not to trust me, or - later - edited the style of her official report in term to insinuate a suspicion in adequacy or reliability of my words. Also, an objective reason of similar reaction is possible. So, if to assume that, having much less wide lexicon in French, than in those languages (except Russian), which I know better (German, Polish, English), I used more frequently international medical terms at the description of symptoms etc., and - by that - could seed a confusion in the head of the nurse, who got used to communicate with Francophone people and with more "ordinary" patients. Such explanation MAY "work" at the level of this particular case, but does not match all episodes of ugly incidents at other hospitals. Therefore, the question of tone, in which the report of the triage nurse is composed, remains open.


Number 3. July 14, 2015. Prescription of Cipro (antibiotic); another signature of the same doctor.


Number 4. July 14, 2015. The beginning of this form' filling - 16:43, printout time - 22:06. Among all documents from Notre Dame Hospital's ER, this document, is, perhaps, the most "interesting". First, the blood pressure is specified as 162 x 85 that is incredibly high for me. A set of printouts from different hospitals' ER show unusual for me, very elevated blood pressure and - frequently - too high pulse. It is difficult to assume that both of my tonometers (devices for blood pressure measurement) "lie", showing - as a rule (behind very rare exception) - 120 x 80 or, at pulse rate as usually not higher than 65 - 75. I did "control" checks of blood pressure several times in the stores of the Pharmaprix network. They were showing the same 120 x 80 blood pressure. The same result normally shows the blood pressure measurement in my family doctor's office. It is also difficult to assume that dozens of times the blood pressure in the offices of other doctors (in walk-in clinics, etc.) also "lie". It is also non-realistic to assume that the devices of tonometers (hemodynamometry) are damaged in all hospitals' emergency departments, or that everywhere in the reports these digits are deliberately distorted. The most plausible explanation: is that each visit to hospitals' ER brings an incredibly severe stress for me, posing - in itself - serious threats for mine health, being, in turn, the result of regular mockeries, cruel, unusual, and unhuman actions of the medical staff in the most of cases.


The text under the capital letters (Quebec French):


Échelle de sedation: (S) = Sommeil normal, éveil facile (1) = Éveillé et alerte (2) = Parfois somnolent, éveil facile par stimulation verbale (3) = (Somnolent, s'éveille mais s'endort durant la conversation ou s'éveille par stimulation physique (4) = Endormi profondément, s'éveille difficilement ou pas du tout à la stimulation


Now, a brief English translation (my translation of this bureaucratic text [unfortunately, because Quebec bureaucracy has developed such a "lange nouveau" for medical institutions and health care - that this particular translation is not at the adequate level, but quite adequate on sense]): LEGEND - falling asleep - Level: (S) = normal dream, easy awakening =

(1) = light sleep (nervous sleep)

(2) = a bit drowsy, easy awakening in response to oral stimulation =

(3) = sleepy, wakens, but falling asleep during conversation or wakens from physical stimulation

(4) = deeply sleepy; wakens with difficulties, or does not even at stimulation.


Any of the "badges" (S, (1), (2), (3), (4)) - is noted in my file, and, so, no doubts neither in my mental adequacy, nor in lack of similar problems (for example, in case of a trauma or at the damage caused by hematuria, etc.) with the central nervous system.


Number 5. July 14, 2015. The diagnosis is made precisely and correctly ("cystitis, probably a fungal infection" [if I truly deciphered the medical "scribble" in French]): without all those tricks that accompanied the rapports in my files in St. Mary's ER, or in other McGill-affiliated hospitals. If - I repeat - I truly decrypted what is written in this document, then it is an absolutely unique example of the only presumable diagnosis in all history of my problems concerning UTI-s. In that case, why ANY of other doctors during the entire 15 years (!) did not state absolutely ANY diagnostic assumption?! This happened just because ALL OF THEM were consciously engaged in concealment.


Number 6. July 14, 2015. The laboratory result: the microorganism - contagium - is not found. However, there are real doubts in the authenticity of this report on microbiology [bacterial "culture")]: in this printout it is specified that sample's color - is "sitrin" (in French: "lemon"), whereas actually it was blood-red, and even the picture (which is not provided here for ethical reasons) proves this. But - if such a simple sign as color - is distorted, - whether it is possible to trust believe that the microbiology yielded a negative result?


Another question: whether the suspension in a jar could - in about 20 minutes (before delivered to the laboratory) - change its color, when formed a sediment? The answer can probably be received only at an expert.


But then, there is another question: why - in this printout - the norm at the end of this horizontal line is specified as "sitrin", whereas usually (in all French printouts (which I saw) the norm is marked as "jeune" (yellow [about color])? A difference in a pathology definition. In medical reference books and manuals in French I read that, really, the color for norm (accepted according to standards of the French terminology) is "jeune", and "citrin" is among options of "pathological" coloring. I do not want to be a bore and, especially, to cast suspicion on honest and decent people, but all my previous negative experiences forces to check and recheck again and again, and to formulate questions...


Number 7. Contains Version "a" and Version "b". This is the full printout of the urine test (Notre Dame Hospital; Emergency Department, July 14, 2015): the analysis of all components, except microbiology. "Version "a" is a printout, which I managed "to get" directly in the emergency department on 14-7-2015. (Additional detail: when I addressed in the internal (ER) documentations and tests' reception window, the same nurse that snatched on me for a question of how to learn if the bacterial culture was found - she boldly (even aggressively) refused to provide to me the copy of a preliminary result of the analysis. And, still, I found a way to catch it (this copy). "Version "b" is a printout from the medical archive of Notre-Dame Hospital.

The reason for seeking a copy from the archive was to learn if a bacterial or a fungus culture was found within next 2 days (as it should be done by the norms protocol) [however, often they skip this task in the ER-s]. (See below)


Version "a" | the printout fro, July 14, 2015 in emergency department (see above)


Version "b" | the printout from Notre Dame Hospital's medical archive (see above)


First of all, it is necessary to pay attention to the differences (divergences?) between versions "a" and "b". On principle, no differences should be between 2 copies of the same laboratory test. If they are not identical, it points to some sort of falsification by definition.


First, in the printout from the medical archive (Version "b") - there is a puzzling heading: "ne sera pas classé au dossier" (not to categorize [not to include] in the file). Maybe, it is a common practice in this hospital; maybe, it is a standard heading, and there is nothing unusual? Unlikely... I am not completely sure, but it looked like this particular test was already prepared for elimination, and, therefore, was made "half-secret" (classified). Anyway, there is a legitimate question (even if this would be a common practice): why tests' results (reports) from Notre Dame Hospital's ER should be not included in patient's file and arranged.


Secondly, in the printout from the medical archive (Version "a") - there is an additional line: "L'abondance d'érythrocytes peut masquer la présence d'autres éléments a la microscopie" ("The surplus of erythrocytes can mask the presence of other elements at microscopy").


In the printout from the medical archive (see Version "b"), this line is already absent. Why? Here, it is even more difficult to assume that this is "a common practice". It looks like this line was removed because someone tried to hide (from me, the patient, and from any other potential "civil" person) this note-remark. And, certainly, this "someone" did not expect that the printout of the preliminary result from July 14, 2015, turned out to be in my hands...


Why it is so important? Yes, because the laboratory staff whether did not trust possibly "lulling" (future) microbiology culture result (or did not believe in its authenticity?), whether the infection was so obvious to a laboratory doctor on the sum of factors - that he (her) (or they) could not refuse a temptation to emphasize it in this additional line. It is a pity that then - on July 14 - 18, 2015 - I did not attach it rather a serious significance.


Number 8. The prescription of Cipro; Notre Dame Hospital's emergency department; July 14, 2015.


July, 15, 2015

And, again, only my family doctor agreed to administrate laboratory tests (see below):


CHAPTER 4.


AUGUST, 2015.


August 14, 2015.

The 1-st visit to new rheumatologist was overshadowed by familiar picture.

The secretary appointed the following rendezvous with the doctor for a date, when the doctor does not work.

Such an instant sabotage cut off the most modest hope for the better.

"Human error" suggestions did not match the reality of "systematic" "human errors" around me.


The business card marked with a hand of the secretary where it is written "on October 13, 2015" whereas on Tuesdays the doctor does not work. Also the figure of date "13" - a favourite "black tag" of Satanists attracts attention.


However, new doctor, as it looked, would not give up to the threats of terrorists, and was enthusiastic about improving the quality of my life, helping me to fight my health problems.


She administrated physiotherapy, which was not only unusual treatment for myself, but a privilege in itself, because only SOME patients used to receive such a favor in 2015.


The referral on shoulder physical therapy, which was written out by the new rheumatologist. Though the appointment with this new doctor was on August 14, 2015, in this document the number is specified as "13". Another charade.


Requisition for laboratory tests, administrated by the same rheumatologist. Components, denied by other doctors, are checked here.


August, 15, 2015

2 medicines - the Novoprofen and Erythromycin - received in drugstore on August 15, 2015, prescribed by the dentist. After a course of erythromycin - all urological problems (related to chronic infection (and recurrences of acute UTI) disappeared for a while.

It is not the 1st time, when erythromycin works best of all (best than other remedies) against this "mysterious" infection. (See medications' printout below)


August, 17, 2015

New rheumatologist also administrated X-ray of all joints. This could help understanding the roots of arthritis, and produce, finally, a diagnosis. Little by little, I began understand that Dr. Jiri Krasny (definitely - a good man; in spite of everything, which happened just before his retirement) not occasionally sent me to Dr. Khananian. This was his vengeance to bad people, who, probably, forced him to sabotage medical help for me in 2014-2015. (See below the X-ray referral)

The referral for all joints' X-ray, which was administrated by the new rheumatologist on August 15, 2015. (See below)


Here the case is presented in such a way as if my family doctor - not Dr. Jiri Krasny - has referred me to the new rheumatologist. By the internal rule, the line "Ref: ..." beard, after 1-2 first appointments (of a new patient), the name of the doctor, who referred to this rheumatologist. This small forgery (counterfeited by the rheumatologic center' secretary) - undoubtedly - hides something much bigger. Dr. Khananian's license number and her signature is placed below. By chance, I saw other Centre's patients' prescriptions or referrals, but in none of them noticed same mark "Ref: ....". Later, in one patient's paper, I saw the name of Dr. Krasny. Doctor Krasny - retiring nearly in a year - "threw me out" from his office though he continued to follow other patients. Under the law, Dr. Krasny could not just refuse me the access to his treatment and willfully transfer me to another doctor without my consent.


The 17-8-2015 X-ray report (see above): calcification found; calcified tendinitis. It was just another proof that pain (and dysfunction) during arthritis attacks was real, did not "invented" by me.


August, 22, 2015

All-body allergy on August 22, 2015 (Saturday). The following pictures (below) show the moving horrific bumps, which were forming in my body: like giant parasites-insects, or other alien bodies. Here only 1 hillock is shown. But such huge temporary growths and smaller swellings (kept on all around my body within an hour - an hour and a half), being followed by intolerable burning, itching and pain, run to 4-6 simultaneously. Some of these swellings moved (!) under skin as living beings, causing terrible pain. It looked like some huge ticks creep under skin. Perhaps, experts could reproduce this movement by means of a series of pictures. I have no video camera now, and could not film this phenomenon. (See below)


This physiological phenomenon looks like images from a phantastic horror films. This elevation looks like a knee, but this is not a knee: this bump has formed in the muscle of the upper extreme of the leg. It is possible to imagine - except pain and improbable physical sufferings - my confusion adjoining with mistrust, a fright and shock of surprise, which generated a strongest stress that I endured.


In the fall (autumn) of 2015, this phenomenon began to repeat, sometimes, on a smaller scale. On the basis of the 2-nd picture (see the right image) it is possible to realize how huge was the size of allergic swelling on August 22, 2015. Other inflation of the large size manifested in the bottom of the stomach; the third - approximately near the right shoulder-blade. Other "hillocks" were smaller; at least, 3 of them moved: within 5-10 cm. One of these small swellings overpassed a way down - from the top front part of the leg (near inguinal area) to back popliteal area. It is not clear if this improbable horror corresponds to what is called "hives".


CHAPTER 4.


August, 24, 2015

The awful allergic reaction on August 22, 2015 (calling it "hives" is under the question as such giant and MOVING hives may not be described in the medical literature), was followed by next recurrence of mega-gross hematuria (August 23, 2015), bladder pain, and other urological pains; and - on August 24, 2015 - I was taken by car out of Montreal, to the office of non-Montreal urologist, who treated me before Dr. Morris.


I decided to return to this doctor (if it is possible) - and not to have any more contacts with Dr. Morris. There I found sympathy and desire to help, and got on reception to this decent doctor - without an appointment.


The jar with a sample was full of blood. At my request, he immediately administrated ultrasound of kidneys, abdominal cavity, and bladder. Unlike Dr. Morris, who saw similar samples - full of blood, but (in medical documents) wrote "micro-hematuria", THIS doctor marked it - in his ultrasound's requisition - as "gross hematuria"; in contradiction with what Dr. Morris wrote in all papers. Let's compare their records (fragments from requisitions from Dr. Morris - and other urologist, Dr. El-Hackim):


Ultrasound requisition from non-Montreal urologist (see above). He wrote: "Gross hematuria".


Dr. Morris's ultrasound's requisition (December 11, 2014), when - in his office - the jar with the sample was full of blood, but he - all the same - wrote "micro-hematuria".


I did not wish to address to St. Mary's Hospital any more concerning the laboratory analyses and radiographic exams, but, as I already had all telephone and fax numbers of this hospital under hand, and needed the ultrasound scan urgently, I contacted St.-Mary's Hospital first. Approximately, on August 25 (2015) I called St.-Mary's Hospital, and sent the requisition there. However, next day filling a regret about this, I decided to call other hospitals as well. Wishing not to address to St. Mary's Hospital, where my lab tests were forged, falsifies, or "missing", on August 27 - 30, 2015, I also called 2 other McGill-affiliated hospitals, and sent there the ultrasound's requisition from Dr. El-Hackim by fax. However, the whole month of September passed, but I did not receive any call back from these hospitals.


In September and at the beginning of October, I began to call these hospitals to find out what has occurred - after all.


As soon as I was pronouncing my name and my medical card number, I used to be immediately disconnected, or was redirected to other medical worker, and, as a result, my calls were blatantly sabotaged.


An impression was made that the registration (for ultrasonography) of my priority on the waiting list, and the date for this procedure were deliberately blocked to please Dr. Morris, or those, who stands behind him.


At last, on November 13, 2015, I sent a fax with a personal request and a copy of the requisition to another hospital.


In 20-th of October, without having achieved anything, I began to call even more persistently to one of those 2 hospitals (MGH), where already called and sent faxes.


By then, I lost somewhere a new fax number of one of these 2 hospitals (where already called and sent the fax), and began to keep calling to its information center - to learn this number.


I wrote down the general phone number of radiology (which I also received from the information desk) - 514-9344434, - but, calling there for days, I could reach nobody.


Finally, I received radiology's ultrasound section's phone number - 514-934-8322 - where I phoned, receiving the confirmation that their fax number - 514-934-8322 - has never changed. I already sent a fax with the requisition to this particular fax number in the end of August - and (repeatedly) in the beginning of October, and - then - again - in October. So, someone deliberately misinformed me about the change of the fax number.


On October 27, 2015, I (which already time!) sent the fax (with the requisition) to the same fax number, with an accompanying note - demanding the confirmation of the fate of all my faxes.


However, there passed other 2 weeks, and - again - no answer.


It became obvious that Dr. El-Hackim's ultrasound's requisition was blatantly sabotaged (while Dr. Morris's requisition, prescription, or lab test's assignments were never postponed or sabotaged). I needed an URGENT ultrasound's examination, and these monsters in 3 hospitals perfectly knew it. They consciously used unusual and cruel treatment, perfectly realizing that it is equal to torture. Could I disregard that any ultrasound report may be falsified, modified (to please Dr. Morris's cover up expectations), forged, or confiscated, and, if bladder's thickening, stones formation, polyps, or other abnormalities would be found, they may be concealed?


But I had not choices, and continued my struggle for my rights to have an ultrasound test.


McGill hospitals' ultrasound departments not only blocked me an access to this test, but - by that - sabotaged my following appointments with Dr. El-Hackim, because seeing him without the ultrasound's results was senseless and useless. Dr. Morris (and those, who stood behind him) still kept me a "prisoner of war", forcing me to surrender, and to return to sinister and frightening service of Dr. Morris. However, I did not give up, and continued trying to get an appointment for an ultrasound examination nevertheless.


So, 4 months after the beginning of more frequent gross hematuria, and 4 months after the submission of ultrasound's requisition to 2 hospitals, I began to call another hospital (RVH), and sent a fax with the requisition and with an accompanying note there.


Here is the English text of my message (I sent its version in French as well) (see below):


To: Radiology Secretariat,

HRV (Royal Victoria Hosp.)

At GLEN SITE Montreal,

Quebec H3K 1C7

Tel. 514-934-4434

Fax. 514-843-1301


From: Lev GUNIN

(address, tel., fax).


Dear Sir or Lady!

Please, put me on your waiting list for an ultrasound procedure; I am faxing a requisite paper as a separate page.


I"ll appreciate if you can shorten the waiting time for me, considering 4 next reasons:


1) In the end of August, 2015, I called another McGILL University Hospital for an ultrasound appointment, but was never called back.

2) After August, 2015, asymptomatic bleedings have been replaced by hematuria combined with pain in the right kidney. (Severe allergy that presides every bleeding instantly disappears following hematuria).

3) There is a hardship for me to turn to ER, after bizarre events I"ve experienced in Emergency Rooms.

4) In 20-s of October, 2015, having hardship to reach someone at 514-9344434, I called McGill University hospitals phone/fax directory, and received a fax number of MGH"s ultrasound department as 514-934-8322.


After sending the requisition to fax 514-934-8322 on October 27, 2015, I was never contacted from fax"s destination.


Waiting for date and time of an ultrasound appointment.


My best regards,

Lev (Leon) Gunin.

November 13, 2015.

[Please, be aware that my fax indicates wrong date & time; only the date & time, indicated the present document, is valid]


...................


Without having received any confirmation from this hospital, I resent the same fax on November 25, 2015.


(see below)


See below the confirmation of sending these faxes and their arrival in medical institutions:


Fax from November, 25, 2015.


An outraged, scandalous thing - is the fact that nobody ever called me back after receiving this fax in Royal Victoria Hospital; following this fax, I was not given a date of ultrasound - despite my repeated calls and faxes; my messages left on the answering machine were also disregarded.


On January 25, 2016, I sent a fax with the identical content to all 3 hospitals, where already sent the ultrasound's requisition: to MGH, RVH and Verdun. All 3 faxes have enclosed the identical content, with only that difference that I sent the fax to Verdan hospital in French (see below - the identical text of all 3 messages - the English version):


To: Radiology Secretariat,

HRV (Royal Victoria Hosp.)

At GLEN SITE; Montreal, Quebec

Tel. 514-934-4434

Fax. 514-843-1301


From: Lev GUNIN

(address; phone and fax number;

medical card and hospital cards numbers)

Dear Sir or Lady!

Please, put me on your waiting list for an ultrasound

procedure [I am faxing a requisite paper as a separate page].

I"ll appreciate if you can shorten the waiting time for

me, considering the next:

On November, 13, I sent the requisition paper

(see below + on a separate page), accompanied by

next letter (quotation):

__________________________________

1) At the end of August 2015, I called another McGill

University Hospital (St. Mary"s) for an

ultrasound appointment, but was never called back.

2) After August 2015, asymptomatic bleedings have been

replaced by hematuria combined with pain in the right kidney.

(Severe allergy that presides every bleeding instantly

disappears following hematuria).

3) Around October 20th, 2015, having a hardship to reach

someone at 514-934-4434, I called McGill University

hospitals phone/fax directory and received a fax number

of MGH"s ultrasound department as 514-934-8322. After

sending the requisition to fax 514-934-8322 on

October 27th, 2015, I was never contacted from the

fax"s destination. However, if they received

fax in the wrong department, why did they not

try to contact me, informing about such a

mistake?! [end]

________________________________________

Nov. 12th, 2015, I could finally reach tel. 514-934-4434


and was given a fax number to send the requisition:

514-843-1301.

As stated above, on Nov. 13th, 2015, I sent the

requisition to fax 514-843-1301, but was never contacted

for an appointment date.

On Jan. 25th, 2016, after many unsuccessful attempts,

I finally reached 514-934-4434 and was told that there

are no records of my calls or faxes "in the system".

I have all the conversations in audio formats (recorded),

and all the faxes that I sent, printed out.

So, in addition to this letter and (again) requisition,

I am sending a copy of my last fax submission to

514-843-1301 (13.11.2015).

It is impossible to suggest that my fax was

malfunctioning, giving a false report on successful

submission, because I sent the same fax from

2 different fax machines (see below).

Best regards,

Lev (Leon) Gunin.

January 25th, 2016.


...............


Besides, I called McGill hospitals' ombudsman, having retold the epic with this ultrasonography and having demanded to intervene. Only after it, I was called, and reported that the MGH hospital appointed the ultrasonography date: February 3, 2016.


SEPTEMBER - DECEMBER, 2015.


SEPTEMBER, 2015.


September 22, 2015.


On September 22, 2015, I went to pass lab tests on requisition of non-Montreal urologist, whose patient I was during a number of years - before becoming a patient of Dr. Morris (to whom I addressed because of prosecutions and intimidations by police on my way to Dr. El-Hacking and back home; because Dr. El-Hackim's office was far away from my home, and reaching it with urological problems - by public transportation (especially during the winter time) - became just impossible; because I felt awkwardly among other patients - residents of that town, where - even without residents from Montreal like me - there were not enough doctors for all patients; and because requisitions and prescription of Dr. El-Hackim were sabotaged by the pharmacies, laboratories, and medical imaging departments).


If I confuse nothing, I did not see Dr. El-Hackim that time, but only spoke with him by phone, and he sent me - by fax - the requisition for laboratory analyses, which doctor Morris refused.


The blood test showed by then an abnormal (a little bit lowered) level of glucose and creatinine (kidneys function), and high bilirubin; the ur. test - gross hematuria, and very high (above normal) level of erythrocytes and crystals oxalates (high risk of stones formation in kidneys and bladder). The microbiology culture did not reveal infectious microorganisms, but here that is interestingly: in the result's printout is specified that, allegedly, "patient takes a course of antibiotics", but, by then, I did not take any antibiotics, and, so, the test result on culture could not be trusted again.


This test (see above) directed an alarming signal to Dr. Morris (whom I sent a copy of this test by fax) about a worrying risk of UT stones formation (abnormal result of oxalates' count). However, Dr. Morris did not react in any way, and Dr. El-Hackim had no case to help me by then.


OCTOBER, 2015.


Month-long (without several days) Mark lived by us; he returned to himself only on Friday morning, October 22, 2015.


From October 10 to October 19, 2015: pain in the right side, which was especially shown (or amplifying) when rising from lying position and at some other movements. Therefore, I assumed (probably, wrongly) that it can represent a muscular, vascular (but not renal), or other pain.


October 22 and 23 (2 days) I had serious problems with the gastric emptying (during the last period - a rare emergency situation).


At night from 23 to 24 Oct. - sudden gripes in the stomach and intestines; pricking feelings in the "pre-sphincter" area (like a stone bundle presence there); sharp, unexpected pains and spasms: as at obstruction, or twisted bowels.


It is excessive to describe what sophisticated methods (long ago read in the medical literature or picked up independently) and with what tortures it was achieved to get rid of full blocking of intestines. It was not without the gastric lavage.


Naturally, such a jam could not but damage something inside.


Anyway - what is it - only the experts can tell. All this reminds some chemical's getting into the gastroenterological tract, causing there a chemical reacting with the gastric content, and turning it in a hardening - as plaster or concrete - masse.


Meanwhile, nothing unusual was present in my diet these days. On the contrary, there were more liquids and soft food.


Sunday (October 25) - right kidney ached again.


At the same time, allergy with "urological" dermatosis returned, preventing from sitting.


On Monday, October 26, 2015, after returning from a walk-in clinic (where I received a referral to dermatologist concerning several fresh face and others (see photos) new lesions similar to warts, which appeared during the period between September, 22 - October, 22, 2015) I felt non-significant, but notable right kidney pain, and then scarlet blood in urine flow suddenly appeared.


After the signs of hematuria, the kidney did not hurt any more, but pain was felt at very deep breath.


Around 18:40, my wife went to Cote-des-Neiges Market (near Queen Mary), and "at the same time" gave me a lift to emergency department of St. Mary's Hospital. Having already closely approached hospital, I changed my mind, and returned back.


The urine test would hardly reveal something because blood was visible only 2 times, then it was not noticeable any more, and kidney pain passed, too. Apparently, once again, the hematuria was a consequence of the mensual bacteria injection from one place to another, just during that last colorectal disaster at night of October 24, 2015. And it could lead to the next short-term opportunistic infection. As well as in the previous (last) 2 times, including the cystitis - diagnosed in Notre Dame Hospital's Emergency Department, the "urological" dermatosis (or an allergy) completely disappeared approximately in 2-3 hours after hematuria.


When I came home after reconsidering to address into St. Mary Hospital's emergency department - bright red / brown hematuria (5-6 hours ago) did not repeat. Soon the sample was like a distilled water.


So - in case of addressing into the ER - I would suffer in vain 10-12 hours in the Emergency Room, while the test would not reveal hematuria, and they would refuse (as I expected) ultrasonography. They would not take a swab test, in connection with dermatological infection - as already repeatedly happened. And the tormenting conditions in ER, and an inevitable stressful situation in ER, could strike a serious blow to my already affected health.


October 27, 2015.


Since October 27, 2015 - the right kidney began to hurt again.


October 28, 2015.

Since October 28, 2015, I started a new course of Cipro antibiotics (not the type that was prescribed in Notre Dame Hospital's ER, but the kind that was prescribed by Dr. Morris).


NOVEMBER, 2015.


November 2, 2015.


During Mark's visit (we celebrated my wife's birthday) - the upper lip swelled up.


In 3 hours, strange tussiculations began.


November 3, 2015.

This was my birthday.


I woke up at 7:30 in the morning from a severe cough (which passed in 2 hours). (Besides of extremely rare exceptions, I never cough).


At the same time, an "urological" dermatosis returned.


November 15, 2015.

During my evening bicycle trip, the huge stone flew down (to bicycle paths) from the canal bridge at Charlevoix.


When I reached to the bridge at Wellington, the bicycle chain suddenly burst. By some coincidence - at the same time - the front lamp of the bicycle ceased to shine (to work), too.


November 17, 2015.

After our travel to Addison store (from 10:30 till 12:30), my main hard drive (hidden at home) was found in a different place (not where it was left): certainly, displaced during our absence, and some important medical documents' digital copies (files) (for example, blood tests' results with anemia, pre-diabetes sugar elevation, high (abnormal) leukocytosis, bilirubin, etc.) were erased.


November 22, 2015.

During my walk to Monk Street (along the Lashin channel, almost from the Old Port), I, probably, unintentionally "disappeared" from the shadowing surveillance, when walked through the web of small streets near the canal.


The surveillance overtook only on my way back, in a posture of a 20-year-old runner in a ski hat.


Right there, further, on St.-Patrick St., the white "jeep" Dodge (going towards me) with the plate license number Quebec 593-IAI, or 593-TAT - seemingly turning into the yard of some enterprise, unexpectedly made there a 180 turn - and, having again taxied on the road, went in the opposite direction: as though the driver deliberately made this maneuver at such distance from me to hide the car's license plate number from my sight. However, using a telephoto lens ("zoom") of the camera as the field-glass, I could see the first group of signs (593...), and - later - when the same car appeared again - to identify it and to read its full number.


This car appeared on my way back 3 times in KEY points (the first time - near my pass under the railway bridge near tunnel Atwater).


The same maneuver was made by another car: black color Mercedes (or, perhaps, Hyundai-lux) with the 1-st letter "M" in its number. This car turned on entrance near the tunnel Atwater to the route, but (in defiance of all traffic rules) was deployed in the same place (on the unilateral road), having stopped - against the movement - for 10-15 meters from the place of its turn from the main St. Patrick Street (on which I moved towards the Old City of Montreal).


I was obviously watched from this car.


Having foreseen my intention to bypass the car behind and to look at its number, the driver got away vehicle from the place accelerating - and - at a good speed - curtailed on St.-Patrick, ignoring all traffic rules, traffic light and road signs.


Later, the white Quebec 593-IAI jeep Dodge, or 593-TAT, appeared on my way 2 more times; last time - along with the same young "runner", who definitely spotted me on my way back near the western bicycle bridge via the canal (next to the west after a similar bridge from Atwater market).


November 26, 2015.

A very important fact is that, since March 2, 2015, Dr. Morris practically ceased to accept me, contrary to my insistent calls to his secretary and numerous requests for an urgent rendezvous after March 2, 2015.


On March 2, 2015, his secretary handed me Dr. Morris's business card with an appointed rendezvous to November 26, 2015 (at 17:10).


From March 2 to November, 2015, I could not get any appointment with Dr. Morris though he perfectly knew and understood my problems, and how urgent and how serious they are.


The business card of doctor Morris with the rendezvous for November 26, 2015, which is written out on March 2, 2015. (See the image below).


However, on the eve of this rendezvous, a new - next - recurrence of an acute disease have started - with plentiful hematuria, sharp pain and "urgency", - so even a trip to Dr. Morris's office, rather not very far from my home (4 Metro stations with 1 transfer and 15 min. walking), and an expected waiting time in doctor's office - represented an impossible task for me and an additional torture. Then, my condition became so serious that I was not able to leave my home at all.


Therefore, I several times called Dr. Morris's office again and again - to have a confirmation that this rendezvous was not cancelled, and left messages on his answering machine.


I also sent a fax to Dr. Morris's office with the same question.


As a rule, the automatic messaging machine or doctor's secretary calls days before, in a day or two to a rendezvous, reminding that on such date, in such time - patient has an appointment with the doctor.


However, on the eve of November 26, 2015, NOBODY called me with confirmation, and nothing remained - to me - but to stay at home. I had a justified impression that my appointment was cancelled, and that, in general, Dr. Morris does not want to see me, and - for this reason - does not answer my calls and sabotage appointment's confirmation.


(On the same day, November 26, 2015, I called the office of Dr. Morris from my home and even from a payphone (when my phone suddenly stopped working [due to telephone line sabotage be Bell] during 2 hours, or rather badly worked); but nobody answered the phone and nobody called me back. (If someone called, I would see a lost call and could listen to a message, despite the phone line malfunctioning.) It means that, rather, nobody was in the office that day, and my appointment, most likely, was a fake).


Whether it is worth being surprised to the fact that, when, on March 2, 2015, I - in despair - asked Dr. Morris, "how can I live normal life, and what can I do about the need to run urgently each 15-20 minutes to the toilet", he answered: "Drink less liquids"?


Whether it is worth being surprised that - on my astonishment and outrage concerning his answer, when I asked him if he is deliberately advising me not to drink water for provoking lithiasis calcification and formation of stones in kidneys and bladder, and whether increasingly frequent and more and more plentiful hematuria indicates that stones already began to be formed, - Dr. Morris answered that, allegedly, under his assumption, I, supposedly, drink "too much water", and "from its pressure", "which is too big", originate the bleedings?


Whether it is worth being surprised to the fact that, when I asked Dr. Morris, how does he know that I drink too much liquids and why does he came to such conclusion, and how much is "too much": he had nothing to say, and kept silence?


Whether it is worth being surprised to the fact that all my attempts to transfer myself from Dr. Morris to another urologist were nipped "in the bud" - as it is possible to assume: at the initiative of Dr. Morris?


But, if I would listen to Dr. Morris's "advice" to "drink less liquids", I would provoke bladder (and kidneys) stones' formation - the risk of which was already very high, judging by the detection of oxalates (crystals) by the laboratory analysis. The same risk amplifies several times also because Dr. Morris refuses rendezvous to me, at the same time blocking to me an access (as logically follows from the current events) to other urologists.


From August to December, 2015, I came to Dr. Morris's office twice, trying to get a referral on abdominal scan, and also demanded the requisition on ultrasound in one of the faxes to Dr. Morris, but could not achieve anything.


Meanwhile (after August 24, 2015), I continued my attempts to receive the date on ultrasound scan on Dr. El-Hackim's (my former (non-Montreal) urologist's) requisition, but 3 hospitals were sabotaging even the procedure of registering me for the waiting list. I could use the help of Dr. El-Hackim's secretary, who, perhaps, would be able to register me for this exam in that town's hospital, but - in my condition - a trip (during cold November) to that faraway hospital, using public transport, and in the situation of police intimidation represented a real challenge.


P.S. The following photos illustrate only several problems (and only external signs of these problems), similar to which appeared weekly during a number of years, totally being hundreds. The doctors most often completely ignored them, pretending that my physical and psychological sufferings in connection with these problems were "imagined", and my visits to them are generated by "exaggeration" and "hypochondria" (but, for example, when it was impossible to get an appointment with someone of 4 dermatologists, whose patient I was, and who rendered an adequate help (unlike other doctors) - a real nightmare began...) (See photos below)


Rash. 2008. (See above)


Rash and eczema, 2009. (See above)


Rash, 2011. (See above)


Herpes under the lower lip. 2012. (See above)


Inflammation of a new growth on skin, 2013. (See above)


Inflammation of the skin of a neck and the lower part of the face, 2014.


Skin erosion on hands and appearance of numerous microtraumas, 2014.


Neck dermatitis, 2015.


Hand allergy.


Terrible allergy and rash, 2015.


Since 2013, similar - and still the worst - problems began to arise EVERY week, accumulating at each other; and very few people can imagine what suffering - moral and physical - they brought.


And the fact that - after February 2017 (after 2-nd urological surgery) - these cascades of weekly sores suddenly disappeared: unless it is not a reproach to those, whose profession obliges to humanitarian mission, and who, instead, followed the maxima "not to heal, but to kill".


After 2 urological surgeries (2016-2017) - all skin problems suddenly disappeared.


_________________


Lev Gunin


THE PUNITIVE HEALTH CARE

[HEALTH CARE AS A REPRESSIVE TOOL]


BOOK 5-10


THE UROLOGICAL DRAMA. PART 10.


CONTENT


CHAPTER 1 - Brief Retelling. Vanished Tests.

CHAPTER 2. 2015: Missing Tests and Other Bizarre Things.

CHAPTER 3. 2016: January-February

CHAPTER 4. March 1-18, 2016.

CHAPTER 5. March 19-31, 2016.


* * *


The whole text of the chronological events and medical documents (under the name of "The Punitive Health Care - (Health Care as a Repressive Tool)" is available for examination only on the basis of the following contract between the author and the reader:


I (THE READER) GIVE MY CONSENT THAT, BY CLICKING CORRESPONDING LINKS AND ACCESSING THE TEXT OF "THE PUNITIVE HEALTH CARE", I AUTOMATICALLY AGREE TO THE FOLLOWING PRELIMINARY CONDITIONS [FOR READING]:


-- I am (at least) 18 years old.


1. I (the reader) is undertaking (commit myself) not to distribute the text of "The Punitive Health Care - (Health Care as a Repressive Tool)" - entirely, or in fragments; not to copy medical documents; and not to share the text and images without author' permission.


2. I (the reader) understand that the confidential information, which is contained in this text, cannot be used for any other [than the reading (extraneous; secondary)] purposes and needs, for any researches, essays, stories, etc.


3. I (the reader) commit myself not to sneer at open ticklish personal information (which sharing was induced by circumstances), not to savor any medical, physiological, or anatomic details, and not to use this text as a reason for mockery and persecution.


4. I (the reader) am warned by the author that, except for a number of obviously immoral (by definition) doctors' and medical staff's actions, other decisions and acts described in this "confession" are not subjected to hasty moral assessment because a) only experts can judge finally about their justification and fairness; b) explanations and vindications of other party are necessary. We also do not know to what degree the doctors were under an influence and direct power of police, Ministry of Immigration, and other enforcement agencies, political organizations, groups and persons - with their own ideological, economic, and propaganda interests, - and to what degree this influence impacted on their diagnostic conclusions and assessments of patient's state of health. Many of the documentary confirmed facts incontestably demonstrate that author's ideological stand (who's opposing to younger generation's transformation into zombie-biorobots with mobile phones on shoulders instead of heads; to electronic totalitarianism with its prison-like total video surveillance; and to the tyrannical political censorship) played nearly a major role in enraging the authorities and triggering the persecutions.


5. I (the reader) am warned that the author sees the main cause of the most dramatic (for him) events in the fact that the enforcement agencies and interested persons and groups managed to present him to the medical community as an individual incapable to evaluate his health condition objectively; as a health-consciousan (or hypochondriac); an extremist; a troublemaker; an individual obsessed with panic and alarm patterns; as a person, who is making unreal demands to the system of medical care - concerning his - allegedly - pseudo-maladies and exaggerated gravity of trivial indispositions. This smear campaign of defamation, scurrilous libel, and wicked calumny made impossible receiving an adequate medical care (and sometimes any medical help at all), and led to health undermining, numerous diseases, incidents, and unnecessary sufferings. Doctors also considered difficult to believe in continuous (not connected with each other) illnesses, with an interval of 4-7 days, sometimes rolling at the same time: as tsunami. They refused to believe in these sequences of illnesses' painful course, danger, and significance. This chronicle disproves such a prejudiced opinion, producing an incontestable evidence.


6. I (the reader) am informed that all negative remarks, characteristics, and facts' assessments belong only to the portrayal of criminal groups, extremists, and carriers of anti-humanistic, racist, and totalitarian ideology, but do not contain groundless generalizations and negative assessment of any country, ethnic group, or religion. The author is categorically against dismantling of any of the existing states, and against restrictions of the rights of religious congregations of any faith.


7. I (the reader) am informed that this edition partially presents the previous 2017 edition without any changes, and, thus, may not correspond to later view and opinions.


8. I (the English reader) am informed that some parts of the following English text of "The Punitive Health Care" - were translated from Polish, Russian, or French originals, and may contain primitive language, double interpretation, or puzzled meaning. Such confusing fragments should be compared with their originals in Polish and Russian languages (author's native languages) [2016-2017]; all controversial points must be resolved through such a comparison.


9. In the very last moment of this edition's make-up (April 2023), the author came across a description of so-called Havana-syndrome, and found same symptoms and complications, which he experienced when was attacked by an unknown remote weapon (3 Nov. 2005, 7 Jan. 2013, and 21 June 2016), and developed symptoms of post-microwave irradiation.


_________


CHAPTER 1 - Brief Retelling. Vanished Tests.


Before starting to retell 2016 events, it is worth to remind about the content of the previous sections of this chronicle.


Since my arrival to Canada - in 1994 - 2001 - I had no serious health problems.


However, at the end of 2000, the federal immigration department undertook a number of repressive actions against me and my mother - directed to blasting mother's and mine health.


Using - as a pretext - a forged result of immigration fluorography, they were going close me into the tubercular chamber of the Infectious Disease Unit.


When I exposed those criminal acts of immigration officials, I began to be threatened with an infection of the urinogenital ways.


On January 1, 2001, a urological infection ictus happened indeed (English abbreviation - UTI - is used further); this infection began to ruin my health.


I did everything that could overcome this misfortune, but the Montreal system of medical care and its establishment did not come to the rescue of me. On the contrary, despite human approach of many honest and knowing doctors, and other medics working in this system, their efforts and my efforts were sabotaged by inexplicable actions of various medical institutions.


Right at the beginning, in January, 2001, the test of "a litmus strip" in Dr. Zygmund Zast's office absolutely definitely diagnosed a UTI infection. However, the laboratory analysis - on the next day - "did not find" any bacteria, and, thus, I was refused antibiotics (but even if I would receive them, they could not solve all the same problems without the correct result of the laboratory analysis and the identification of concrete bacterial culture).


Of course, Dr. Zast (Zhast) had to prescribe antibiotics anyways, because the urinalysis dipstick (the "litmus paper-strip") test in his office had revealed such an acute infection of such a scale that there were no doubts about the need of an URGENT course of antibiotics. However, Dr. Zast, to play safe and to avoid responsibility, phoned my previous doctor - Immigration Doctor Wanda Brzezinska, and she, as I suggest, advised him "not to risk" his medical license [or simply threatened him], and to deny antibiotics.


The doctor, who repeatedly helped me in the past (even in my confrontation with Immigration Canada), now refused to provide a copy of urinalysis and strangely reacted to my request.


Something was "not OK" with that first result of the laboratory analysis right after infection's "debut". Since then, dozens of my analyses were exposed to malicious manipulations to a degree of surrealistic nightmare. In certain cases, they just vanished completely, in spite of the fact that the laboratory received a sample. In other cases, the most important (for my disease) part of the analysis - the microbiology culture - was lost (as a rule). I repeat: the results-reports of some of the tests were completely lost in general, and never came to doctors' offices. In other cases, the results of microbiology sent to doctors, but other parts of analyses vanished, which called into question the correctness of the analysis of bacterial culture as well.


These examples of "mistakes" and inconsistency are too numerous to describe all of them here. I just remind some of the examples.


For example, I could not restore (trying to recover them from the medical archive) any other pages of the analysis from October 28, 2002 - except for one single - microbiology (see in the images' attachments). Names of two microbiologists were mentioned in the printout of that result-report. Everyone knows a highly respected doctor of J. Dylewski. But who was such a doctor of M. Libman - and why his examination was required for my urine test? I never (to, later) noticed names of 2 head microbiologists in the same result of any of laboratory analysis from this particular hospital.


This test was proceeded in the laboratory of the St.-Mary Hospital, but Dr. Michael Libman is affiliated with the Jewish General Hospital in Montreal. He cooperates with Canadian Federal Immigration and also with various military and law enforcement agencies, and plays the pivotal role in the international society of infectious diseases - International Society of Travel Medicine and CanTravNet Core Sites. He - is one of key experts on tropical and some other very rare infections (the director of the Center of tropical diseases J. D. MacLean).


This can lead to a suggestion that a very rate infection was suspected in me from the very beginning, but, if Dr. Libman indeed found such an infection in my sample, this was certainly made a secret (if such an infection was not contagious or not actively contagious), known only to the militaries and to the special services.


Dr. Libman was an active consultant for the department of Infectious Diseases of the Infectious Disease Unit Division (Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Microbiology, McGill University Health Centre), and then (so far) - his director. He might be - theoretically - involved in the forged diagnosis "tuberculosis", which Immigration used in an attempt to block my status of the permanent resident of Canada. It is also not excluded that he works in close cooperation with the Israeli government.


Perhaps, the doctor, who attacked me on December 2, 2000, at Montreal Chest Institute (see the detailed description in the corresponding volume of this chronicle), was Dr. M. Libman's partner, or even Dr. Liebman himself (it happened when I went there, in hope to recover a copy of the forged fluorography). Approximately at 15:45 this doctor intercepted me on stairs, and, keeping a suggested Immigration fluorography in an envelope file, on which my name was written, threatened that if I will refuse an "anti-tubercular therapy", I will be infected with a urological infection.


It followed an order - on behalf of M-me Lucy Gefroy (or Jefroi or Joyfroid), who composed the letter of the Montreal Chest Institute (in turn, in the name of Immigration Canada) - to undergo "treatment of tuberculosis", threatening with all penalties in case of refusal.


This letter declared that the Canadian Federal Immigration reported to MCI and Department of Infectious diseases about alleged "tubercular" fluorography.


Next example: is the laboratory test from January 8, 2003; an incomplete urinalysis from MGH laboratory.


"Urinary tract infection" assumes an agent (bacterium), but there was no additional information on its identification, and there were lack of all others lost (somehow "missing") pages.


Suffering from frequent recurrences of UTI-s, I sought to find other pages in the Medical Archive, but - within next few months of 2003 - this only one and single page could be recovered, again.


In 2005, I was told that no urinalysis of January 7-9, 2003, presents in my file.


At last, a letter from the Medical Archive claimed (April 29, 2015) that "no analysis for January 7, 2003, is found in your file".


At the beginning of 2000-s (2003-2004), Dr. Pharand (a urologist) repeatedly sent me to urinalyses (in Hôtel Dieu Hospital, this procedure was by then the most available and took minutes (before the laboratory manipulations with the sample, while in other hospitals it was necessary to wait in huge turn for hours).


After 4-th or 5-th of these analysis (in Hôtel Dieu Hospital), I understood that they do not differ in accuracy, and began to take a photo-picture of every sample, or to write down time, color, etc.


Then, when I compared photos or records with the results-reports of these analyses, it turned out that a lot of things do not match. So, if, for example, I provided the test's sample at 10:00 in the morning, and there was blood in the jar, and the color was brown: in the report-result it was written: "16:00" (time of receiving the sample), and the sample: "absolutely transparent".


When I showed these comparisons to Dr. Pharand, he made laugh of everything, and did not comment about these facts in any way.


Dr. Daniel Pharand (2003-2004), whose negligent, precipitate, humiliating and irresponsible approach damaged my health, not only did not help me, but, on the contrary, caused irreversible damage, having made the previous problems incomparably more serious. (See all the details in the previous part of this chronicles, under corresponding chronologically reports).


Another example. On November 27, 2014, I went to MGH laboratory with a requisition for blood and urine tests. (See documents and images under the corresponding (by dates) chapters). However, this urine test was boldly and archly sabotaged, not because I refused to provide a sample (see details in previously attached facts and images). In the printout of this test was just mentioned that "the sample was not received". A standard, normative, medical protocol's formulation, in that case, is "the patient refused to provide sample". It means that the absent of this urine test was hospital's fault.


About 3 months later, the section "microbiology (culture)" was gone from the urinalysis (on March 2, 2015) in laboratory of the St.-Mary Hospital, and - later (very soon, in next weeks) - the rest of the data of the same result-report was destroyed-erased, while the missing section "microbiology" was changed-replaced by a forged page. Also, the blood test's section of the same analyses (passed with the same requisition) completely disappeared, in exception of only 2 pages from 13.


On July 14, 2015, in Notre Dame Hospital's emergency department, I provided a sample and asked the nurse - acceptance inspector - how I could receive the copy of the result later. Her nervous, even hysterical reaction forced to call in question the section "microbiology, bacteriological culture".


Now - I provide the examples from more recent events:


In Verdun Hospital's Emergency Room, on March 20, 2016, I was given a test tube (a jar) for collecting a general sample, and an additional test tube for microbiology culture.


While there was a label sticker on the test tube for the general analysis - with my name and with my identification number, - there was no identification sticker on the test tube for microbiology (culture). Returning with the sample, I asked the hospital reception attendant (triage male nurse) why my name and medical identification is absent from the second test tube: how it is possible to know, which one is my sample? In a mandative tone, he demanded that I must immediately give him the sample, and ordered to go away to the waiting room, or he will call security guards.


It is obvious: if there was an identification sticker on a test tube for the general test, and there was no identification sticker (nothing!) on the test tube for bacterial culture (microbiology), it means that somebody planned to sabotage the infection's identification, to be sure that "no presence of bacteria" mark would be warranted in the test's printout.


When, in April, 2016, 2 doctors, using the access to Sante Quebec database, studied the report of my visit to Verdun Hospital's ER (on March 20, 2016), the microbiology culture was completely absent ("missing"). However, when I received the same report from the hospital's archive later, I found the page of microbiology culture with a negative result. Obviously, it was added at the end of April, and was not based any sample. At the same time - in violation of the law - there is no official report from a reception office (triage), and, therefore, there is no name of this young specialist - the hospital attendant (male triage nurse), - who so openly and maliciously refused to provide the identification for the test tube for microbiology culture. The blood test showed by then an improbable (in my case) of "creatinine" indicator (in comparison with all previous creatinine tests available to doctors); however, despite my complaints to pain in kidneys, and to obvious symptoms of acute cystitis and pyelonephritis, two doctors threw me out from home from the hospital. (This case will be described with all details in further statements of the sequence of events).


On April 7, 2016, in Royal Victoria Hospital (Glen Site) Emergency Room, a bacterium was found by a urinalysis test on microbiology culture. However, my sample was immediately announced presumably "mixed" (or, rather, "confused") with a sample of other patient, and the access to its result (and, thus, to information on the bacterium) was blocked for me. The most outraged fact is that the name of the bacterium (NOT other patient's identity!) was made a secret.


In an hour or two, the emergency department staff forced me to agree for a repeated test, threatening (if I'll not stop my demands of investigation of that outraged incident and if I'll not stop to resist a repeated urine test) to "send me home". This incident took away 3 or 4 additional hours, prolonging my torments and threatening by an irreversible damage to my health, and destroyed the last (could be) chance to find an infectious agent of non-mensual (non-opportunistic) nature.


I was thrown out of the hospital with disturbing symptoms of an acute urological infection, with a partial ichuria, high temperature, acute UTI, suspicion of a dangerous prostate abscess, and with nearly 20 thousand leukocytes - that was shown by blood test. (This case will be described with all details in further statements about the sequence of events).


These events seriously damaged my health.


If the identification of the bacteriological culture was not sabotaged in Verdun hospital (on March 20, 2016), and the course of antibiotics would be appointed, then the infection would probably not extend after a cystoscopy.


If the name of bacterium, which was found in my first sample in the emergency department of Royal Victoria Hospital on Glen (on April 7, 2016) was not made "secret", I could undergo the treatment earlier, and it would, probably, be more effective (when it used against a concrete microorganism), and today I would not have all these serious complications, which I received.


If the urologist, Dr. Morris, did not refuse a requisition on integrated laboratory analysis on March 3, 2016, when I had an extensive hematuria, a hematochezia, and, most likely, a prostatic abscess and other symptoms of acute UTI, and if he did not ignore my request for help, when a post-cystoscopy infection began to spread, then I should not have inexpressible sufferings, and all complications, which I received due to innumerous Dr. Morris's malicious actions.


As clearly follows from the aforesaid, the numerous cases of malicious manipulations with my medical documentation are evident.


I believe that these "mistakes" were actually deliberate actions directed to undermining my health through the technical staff, and (sometimes) nurses, or workers - laboratory assistants, - or by means of manipulations with the digital documents in the computer database.


Some doctors personally (and, in other cases, all those, who stood behind them) could be "customers" of all these manipulations.


It is also obvious that in Canada (as well as around the world) everyone is afraid for himself and for relatives, against the background of the freedom of speech and pluralism neglect, elimination of all civil rights - from personal privacy to freedom of expression, and progress of general fear, - and executes any criminal order from higher-rank co-workers and from "higher" "bodies".


While some of the crimes against my health were committed because - in Canada - the privatization of medical services strengthens its pressure, and ignore needy patients, and nobody pays attention to their complaints, then other crimes were committed within revenge or punishment.


The free universal medical care in Canada revolves more and more, and - in such conditions - those, who have such opportunity, cripple or kill their obvious or imaginary ideological opponents.


CHAPTER 2. 2015: Missing Tests and Other Bizarre Things.


Here I find it necessary to make VERY IMPORTANT digression.


All these years I tried to obtain (with uncommon persistence) an official diagnosis, and did almost everything possible in my situation in my fight against this "mysterious" illness. (Only in 2014, when Dr. Morris - for the first time - began to insist on cystoscopy, I refused it, and it was the only case, when an offered diagnostic procedure was rejected for my part.


If we assume that Dr. Morris doubted about my description of symptoms (I don't think so, but if even we assume this theoretically), he had a set of medical test to verify the correctness of my description: post-void residual test; uroflow test; 3 types of different ultrasounds tests; CT-scan; MRI; etc. If some of them were considered by him as "too expensive" for the public medical system, why he did not use the simplest and most inexpensive of them - like post-void residual test, or uroflow test, etc.? If he would arrange a MRI test, he would easily find out that the uterus outlet was blocked "from veru" (probably, already since 2014). As one of the best medical specialists in his domain, he, certainly, was aware about my major problems, but he preferred to continue his sabotage of medical help, and, thus, his main goal was not to help me, but to destroy me ("not to heal, but to kill").


So, first, the cystoscopy could be "replaced" by other diagnostic procedures, or their combination; secondly, I said to Dr. Morris that if the diagnostic procedures - suggested by me - do not give any answer to the remaining questions, then I will agree to cystoscopy; thirdly, I agreed to pass cystoscopy, but only on a condition of a preventive course of antibiotics, a guarantee of an immediate help in case of complications, and an instant access to findings results (as such an access is denied to me - as a rule); fourthly (as turned out later), till 2016, the cystoscopy could not bring any benefits; and, at last, when - in March, 2016 - the cystoscopy, after all, was administrated: Dr. Morris reported nothing to me (i.e. about obstruction), hiding the most important findings (except the information about the pathologies that the computer tomography already detected without cystoscopy), undertook or suggesting nothing, and did not plan any surgical procedure or other treatment in connection with the cystoscopy's findings).


I fanatically adhered to a diet, having excluded everything that - as I noticed from a diet - caused aggravations / recurrences. I excluded all spices, all spicy, bitter and salty food, alcohol, cold drinks and food, etc.


All these years tried to keep myself in a good physical shape: walked a lot regularly; since 2006 or 2007 (when - for the first time in my life - I got on the two-wheeled unit on muscular draft, and - since 2005 - became a roller skater) was riding a bike (meeting the certain conditions specified in contraindications!) and running on roller blades; performed special exercises for a lower body and the lower sections of the backbone; was engaged with dumbbells; etc.


I carried out self-treatment by ways of alternative medicine: "garlic therapy", natural substitutes of alpha blockers, antibacterial agents (such as mix of cranberry juice with the ave.), applied pure hot sedentary bathtubs, or with additives of different substances and plants, completed a self-hardening course, tried to heal myself by "dry" fasting, etc.


Self-treatment included the means applied in case of funiculitis, a vesiculitis, and other diseases of the same sphere, but - as it turned out, - except of temporary improvements, all measures did not bring a victory over the illness.


And now I will return to summing up of already described events:


1. On February 27, 2015, I sent a fax to Dr. Morris, reminding him about the urgency of antibiotics prescription, and assuming that not only the acute UTI already causing significant damage and suffering, but also the complications, like an autoimmune reaction, which already caused an arthritis attack, and all this was provoked by the refusal of antibiotics for UTI treatment.

In the same fax, I assumed that his refusal to prescribe 2 types of alpha blockers and some diagnostic procedures a) supported innumerous outbreaks of the infection, b) eliminated chances to reverse the BPE, leading to - possibly - already irreversible level of hyperplasia, and c) provoked an inadmissible level of stones formation risk.


2. Without mentioning Dr. Morris's name, I touched upon the same subject in my conversation with my family doctor, who wrote out a requisition on complete blood-urine analysis, including microbiology culture.

I think that Dr. Morris, and (or) those who stood behind him: they could not allow that - after my fax (in which I reproached Dr. Morris for significant damage that the did to my health and the quality of life (by his refusal of antibiotics, laboratory analyses, alpha blockers, and diagnostic procedures (such as ultrasonography) - literally in several days, a laboratory analysis should confirm an infection (and, so, correctness and fairness of my accusations) - especially as not Dr. Morris, but my family doctor administrated this analysis!

The fact that not Dr. Morris referred me to this blood-urine test, undoubtedly, was an additional sensitive factor for him and his masters.


3. On March 2, 2015, I provided a sample, which included the test for infection (culture). If the test found a bacterium, this would confirm all my statements (lodged in my fax). Unfortunately, I passed the test in St. Mary Hospital's laboratory - where Dr. Morris works, being one of the most influential medics in the area. There are also no doubts that he had a motive and stimuli to destroy the authentic test's report, if a bacterium was found. Dr. Morris is also known for his close ties with St. Mary's laboratory. Whether it is surprising that the culture (microbiology) section has disappeared from this analysis' report?

There is one more probability. It is possible that, pointing to Dr. Morris and representing him as one of the main generators of my problems in receiving fair medical treatment and diagnostics in emergency rooms, laboratories, medical archives, and other institutions, those that stand much above, chose him as a whipping boy to accuse him of their own (equivalent to war crimes) actions. While he could be known to ominous agencies for his serious medical mistakes, his nasty temper, his unethical behavior, and for crossing many of the red lines, and, maybe, partially, took part in generating hostile to me atmosphere in medical institutions, he might be used as a cover to hide much more ominous people.

Dr. Morris's actions were ambiguous, controversial, and his behavior has contained bad and good deeds. However, Dr. Morris's "good deeds" might be just illusive, if they were motivated by other reasons than the well-being of his patient, and - in the following analysis, I will explain more precisely what I mean.

Dr. Morris perfectly knew already in 2013-2014 that a surgery is needed to "repair" the outlet's obstruction, due to calcification, chronic infection, hyperplasia, and frequent abscess. If he said that the surgery is an only solution, I would immediately give my consent. However, he concealed from me that a surgery is needed, and, instead, deliberately damaged my health.

There are too many mysteries around Dr. Morris's treatment and mistreatment in my case.

For example, why Dr. Morris did not contact Dr. Szego, when I asked him to coordinate their actions and to form a joint council? Why Dr. Szego (whom I fully trusted, and considered him an ethical person and an excellent specialist) refused to contact Dr. Morris (on my request), and, instead, referred me to another urologist (his referral was, unfortunately, sabotaged by the Royal Victoria Hospital's administration). By then, Dr. Szego said that, in his opinion, the hyperplasia has reached a very dangerous stage, and some radical measures were urgently needed. Thus, Dr. Szego's referral to another urologist (not Dr. Morris) was administrated within the context of his concerns about such a stage of hyperplasia, and, consequently, it points that Dr. Szego did not trust Dr. Morris, and was sure that Dr. Morris would do nothing about it.

In his turn, Dr. Morris did not want to cooperate with Dr. Szego, but, instead, referred me to Dr. Kinnik, Why? Dr. Kinnik practice in Point-Claire, where he has his private office, and where Dr. Morris used to own a house and lived before moving to Montreal. However, a precondition for having an appointment with Dr. Kinnik was to agree for colonoscopy. Something fishy and sinister seemed to be hidden in this "precondition".


4. In March-April, 2015, both St. Mary's laboratory, and medical archive - tried to hide a loss of medical data. When - on April 10, 2015 - I came to the same laboratory (having already passed the urine test on the same requisition) to hand over - on same requisition - papers for the blood test, I was ordered to provide a sample for the same urinalysis, which I passed on March 2, 2015 (which report's part - microbiology culture - was lost). Trying to overcome my refusal, medics of the laboratory's registry told nothing about the reasons of this repeated test. However, their importunity (and how they exchanged significant gestures and looks) forced me to assume that they were not sincere with me, and participate in some kind of a plot.


5. While the Medical Archive completely blocked me the access to the result of this analysis and its parts, a new page was fabricated and placed in my file instead of the missing "culture". I learned later that the only existing part of the original urinalysis - dipstick+microscopy (March 2, 2016), was entirely withdrawn subsequently from the hospital's database as though it never existed.


6. In the reply to my complaint, hospital's ombudsman recognized the disappearance of the section "microbiology culture" from the result-report - as a one-separate and isolated "human error", ignoring my concern about others similar incidents and problems connected with laboratory tests and medical help in general, such - as other incomplete or missing analyses' results; refusal of medical treatment (if it was, for example, an infection); and concealment of the facts concerning the lost results of lab analyses.

Moreover, the loss of data was deliberately hidden; an attempt was made to replace the missing analysis by another medical document; the missing page of microbiology was replaced with the page about "refusal to provide a sample"; and, at last, the only part of urinalysis of March 2, 2015, was withdrawn from hospital's archive...

Moreover, not only the test for bacterial culture, but also other pages of the same analysis were gone, including most of the pages of blood test: this was completely ignored by the ombudsman.

Was the incident around the missing blood-urine test in March-April 2015 an "isolated" human error"? If medical data can be purposely destroyed or replaced by means of collective conspiracy and connivance, it can open equally well a door for counterfeit medical data: ("tuberculosis", "HIV", or " bladder stones", etc.).


7. When, on April 24, 2015 (MGH hospital's emergency department), the triage nurse provocatively contrived a triggered by her dispute around a lab test (which I wished to pass in the common outpatients laboratory), cunningly infuriating me to speak up about the loss lab tests, and I spoke out about the refusal of antibiotics and loss of laboratory analysis, I underwent mockeries and was presented as a dangerous maniac (a "danger to society"), was labeled as "inclined to suicide and murder", and subjected to illegal psychiatric examination.

It is difficult not to view it as a punishment for my official complaint to St. Mary's Hospital's ombudsman.

Later, I accidentally learned that this triage nurse, who carried out this provocation, was a star of the governmental state propaganda, and favorite of mass media (chosen for a number of interviews), and, perhaps, works in close cooperation with various law enforcement agencies.

Another ombudsman (in reply to my complaint about the horrific incident in MGH's ER) refused the react to my complaint objectively, refused to give an appraisal to triage nurse's actions, but, in the same time, indirectly rejected any insinuations concerning mine, allegedly, "mental disorders".

The office of access to information - at first - left my demands to get an access to information (containing the entries in my medical files on social, political, or "psychiatric" subjects) without an answer, and only in a year after that incident answered with a letter, which did not capture the essence of my demands in any way, and did not correspond to the subject and the content of my inquiry.


8. On July 14, 2015, I addressed to emergency department of the French Hospital Notre Dame. I was quickly and properly examined, in full accordance with a suspicion of an acute infection of UTI. Providing a sample, I asked the nurse - acceptance inspector - how it is possible to receive a copy of the test's result later. Her nervous, literally hysterical reaction (she began to shout at me for no reason at all) puts the section "microbiology culture" of this analysis' report under doubt.


9. After a terrible allergic reaction on August 22, 2015 (part of this phenomenon is known under the name "hives", but it was partly different from hives, and much more horrific), on August 23, 2015, it was followed by gross hematuria, bladder pain, and other urological pains, and, on August 24, 2015, I was brought by car out of borders of Montreal, to the office of non-Montreal urologist, who treated me before Dr. Morris.

The test tube with a sample was full of blood. At my request, Dr. El-Hakim wrote out a requisition on ultrasound of abdominal, bladder, and kidneys ultrasound, and administrated a full blood-urine test with bacterial culture count.

Unlike Dr. Morris (who, seeing a sample full of blood, all the same used to write (for unclear reasons) - "micro-hematuria") THIS doctor specified (in ultrasounds' requisitions): "gross hematuria", in contradiction with Dr. Morris's prescriptions and requisitions.

Dr. Morris used to receive from the laboratories, or from me, the copies of lab analyses, where it was clearly indicated "gross hematuria", but not micro-hematuria. I have an incontestable proofs of the transfer of these copies to Dr. Morris.

In the previous part, I already provided a comparison of Dr. Morris and Dr. El-Hakim's records (fragments from requisitions): as a proof of this controversial contradiction. (See the previous book)


In August, 2015, I decided to leave Dr. Morris forever, and to stay a patient of Dr. El-Hakim, if he will accept me "back", but administrated by Dr. El-Hakim ultrasound and blood-urine test - were sabotaged by 3 Montreal's hospitals (ultrasound departments merely closed for me an access to an ultrasound exam, issued by Dr. El-Hakim; and 5 Montreal laboratories pretended that Dr. El-Hakim's requisition for lab tests are "not from Montreal, and, thus, will not be allowed in Montreal labs", or "not genuine".


Such sabotage forced me to stay with Dr. Morris, in actual captivity of the latter.


Besides, on August, 24, 2015, Dr. El-Hakim tried to convince me to stay with Dr. Morris, and was trying to find the excuses for not continuing treating me as his patient. I observed that Dr. El-Hakim was afraid of something, and this also pushed me in Dr. Morris's hands again, because I did not want that something bad happens with this decent and compassionate doctor.


......................


These are also a number of other documents, which incontestably demonstrate that Dr. Morris lied concerning hematuria, forged data on hematuria in all documents, denying obvious hematuria and gross hematuria FROM THE VERY BEGINNING (i.e. as soon as I became his patient). What for? Why? It is one of many other riddles...


As I already mentioned in the previous book, I called McGill hospitals' ombudsman, having retold the epic with this ultrasound and having demanded to intervene. Only after it, I was called, and reported that the MGH hospital appointed the ultrasonography date: February 3, 2016.


CHAPTER 3. 2016: January-February.


2016.


JANUARY 2016.


January 13, 2016.

Bugs were found in one of our beds. Several estimated scenarios:

1) Bugs got from Mark, who - in November and at the beginning of December - lived by us, because bugs were found in his apartment, and he waited in queue for ex-terminators: when they will come to destroy the insects.

2) For Christmas, Catherine (Marta's friend) presented her a big soft toy (in a floor of human height or more) - a sitting hippopotamus. There could be bugs in it.

3) Bugs could get from us to neighbors under us; multiplied and bred at them, and - from there - began a new attack on us.

4) Bugs have spread all around the house from neighbors under us, and those suddenly, before the New Year (and in visible haste) - left, having thrown ALL their furniture and mattresses in the street: obviously, not casually. In panic getting away from the house, they did not warn neighbors about danger.


I considered earlier that it is a selfish black couple with 3 small children. He never cleaned snow from backstairs to the yard and from his balcony, and - when once he not purposely broke the gate - even did not think to repair it. (Other neighbors wanted to deliver him an ultimatum and to induce him to do it, but the gate was soon repaired by me). Their antisocial mentality could be illustrated by a lot of examples... On the other hand - they were quiet, non-conflicting persons, who are simply "disconnected" from all other inhabitants of the house as though - except of them - no more people exist here. On their place, someone different could live, aggressive and spiteful - so it could be much worse.


January 18, 2016.

On January 18, 2016, ex-terminator - the same pleasant Frenchman, a 52-54 y.o. man (who performed this operation always, in exception of one single time, when a young ugly ex-terminator provoked fracture of 2 of my toes) came again.


January 20, 2016.

On January 20, 2016, I had a rendezvous with the new rheumatologist, Dr. Anna Khananyan (apparently, an Armenian origin). This pleasant young woman made for once more, than doctor Krasny during more than ten years to find out the causes of arthritis, which was attacking me since 2002.


She spent nearly 40 minutes only for showing me all exercises for elbows, wrists, and shoulders, which helped me to restore further their full motive function.


A photo of her children and husband - a very nice person by sight - hung on the wall in her office.


This family exhaling happiness emanation: is - possibly - a balm source on wounds of the suffering people.


Unfortunately, most of doctors endure a depression, suffer from bad luck and diseases, and it quite often prevents them to render an adequate help to ill people.


January 25, 2016.

On January 25, 2016, I sent a new fax with the identical text to offices of medical images of 3 Montreal hospitals:


To: Radiology Secretariat, HRV (Royal

Victoria Hosp.) At GLEN SITE;

Montreal, Quebec

Tel. 514-934-4434

Fax. 514-843-1301


From: Lev GUNIN

address

number of a medical card and hospital card

number of phone and fax


Dear Sir or Lady!

Please, put me on your waiting list for an ultrasound

procedure [I am faxing a requisite paper as a separate page].

I"ll appreciate if you can shorten the waiting time for

me, considering the next:

On November, 13, I sent the requisition paper

(see below+on a separate page), accompanying by

next letter (quotation):

__________________________________

1) At the end of August 2015, I called another McGill

University Hospital (Queen Mary"s) for an

ultrasound appointment, but was never called back.

2) After August 2015, asymptomatic bleedings have been

replaced by hematuria combined with pain in the right kidney.

(Severe allergy that presides every bleeding instantly

disappears following hematuria).

3) Around October 20th, 2015, having a hardship to reach

someone at 514-934-4434, I called McGill University

hospitals phone/fax directory and received a fax number

of MGH"s ultrasound department as 514-934-8322. After

sending the requisition to fax 514-934-8322 on

October 27th, 2015, I was never contacted from the

fax"s destination. However, if they received

fax in the wrong department, why did they not

try to contact me, informing about such a

mistake?! [end]

________________________________________


Nov. 13th, 2015, I could finally reach tel. 514-934-4434

and was given a fax number to send the requisition:

514-843-1301.

As stated above, on Nov. 13th, 2015, I sent the

requisition to fax 514-843-1301, but was never contacted

for an appointment date.

On Jan. 25th, 2016, after many unsuccessful attempts,

I finally reached 514-934-4434 and was told that there

are no records of my calls or faxes "in the system".


I have all the conversations in audio formats (recorded),

and all the faxes that I sent, printed out.

So, in addition to this letter and (again) requisition,

I am sending a copy of my last fax submission to

514-843-1301 (13.11.2015).

It is impossible to suggest that my fax was

malfunctioning, giving a false report on successful

submission, because I sent the same fax from

2 different fax machines (see below).

Best regards,

Lev (Leon) Gunin.

January 25th, 2016.


.....................


Besides sending the fax message, I also called McGill hospitals' ombudsman.


On the same day, January 25, 2016, an unexpected call from Montreal General Hospital sounded, and I was told that the ultrasonography, which date I was waiting since August 2015, is appointed to January 29, 2016. No patient in 2015 waited ONLY for the announcement of the date nearly half a year!


This call took me unawares.


I expected a response from Royal Victoria hospital (RVH), but received a call from MGH (hospital). Why? Not therefore that, by THEN (in this period of time), it was more difficult to arrange or fabricate an inadequate test result in the department of medical images of Royal Victoria Hospital? In last months, I communicated only with RVH ultrasound department, and was never contacted from MGH after my calls and faxes months ago.


Doubting that I correctly caught (heard) the rendezvous time for ultrasonography, I called MGH hospital a bit later.


On that other end of wires, as though nothing was known about the rendezvous already appointed for January 29, 2016 (for ultrasonography). At first, the nurse gave me one date and time, but I asked her to replace it - because this date and time coincided with an important appointment with one of my doctors, and she found for me another date and time: February 3, 2016, at 9:45.


FEBRUARY, 2016.


February 3, 2016.

On February 3, 2016, I went to Montreal General Hospital for passing the ultrasound scan procedure.


On my way from Metro to hospital, I was followed by police.


Ultrasonography was appointed at 9:40, but I was in the hospital already approximately at 8:55.


Having found the room 200 in the case D5, I found the waiting room full of people.


They could not find my file and record about my rendezvous in the registry, and I had to stand near the registry desk for 20 or 30 minutes. Then, the registration nurses told me that I have to seat down in the waiting room, and to wait in the general turn, among the patients, who are already sitting there. But I warned that - because of my condition - I cannot wait so long for ultrasound - especially as this procedure requires filling of the bladder, and I am forced (by my condition) to run nearly each 10-15 minutes in the toilet.


The registration nurse wrote down something on a piece of paper. I lost 20-30 minutes, or more.


Then everything was settled, and I took a seat in the waiting room.


However, soon I was called up to the registry bureau again, and was told that I have to go down - and to make another hospital card, because, otherwise, I will not be able to undergo the ultrasonography (a registration nurse or a medical worker wrote down the corresponding room number on a piece of paper).


Nobody explained to me why my former card "is not good"; THIS (the last one) plastic card was just 1 and a half months old. People were crowded in front of the registry bureau, so, I had no opportunity to argue - and went down to obtain a new hospital plastic card; this took another 20 minutes.


When I came back to the registry, I asked the girls-registrars, why, nevertheless, I had to change my hospital plastic card, which was replaced just 1,5 months ago, and why it took half an hour to find my file. One of them said that my former hospital card was marked as "expired" "in the system", and that the registration of my appointment was "mishandled".


A wide picture of a cynical sabotage had started to clear up.


In that moment, more people came to the desk, and I had to retreat.


Then - once again - I approached the registry bureau to find out what - after all - happened to my faxes, and they said (in the registry) that, allegedly, there was no identification in my faxes, and that - supposedly - therefore they could not figure out from whom exactly these faxes were sent. (This was also noticed "in the system").


I objected that - even if it would be so, - then my identity could be identified by the requisition, which I sent as a separate page. Besides, even if there would be no so-called "cover page", then (even in that case) there is a cap in all my faxes with my name, address, phone, and fax number specified.


I asked to print out - for me - a copy at least of one of my faxes (received in the hospital), because it can help me to figure out - how to adjust the fax in order to avoid future similar mistakes.


Lovely girls agreed to comply with my request, and printed out such a copy.


When I checked this printout, I saw that there was also a title page (a "cover page") with my whole identification data entirely (my full name, tel.-fax number, etc.), which was present not only on this page, but on all other pages of the fax message, and - again - my name, and all my data (including the medical card number) could be seen on the page of the copy of requisition.


I had to wait more than another 1 hour - until I appeared before the front desk again.


And I already - during this time - drank a liter of water as it is necessary for half an hour before an abdominal ultrasound.


Then, I had to wait further, in a corridor recess near the doors of several rooms. There I sat on a chair not less than 2 and a half hours, for this period visiting toilet 3 times. However, I still drank a little bit of water, maybe, a quarter of liter.


At last, I got to the ultrasonography office, where the procedure was carried out by an exclusively attentive technician, apparently, a Muslim of Asian or Arab origin. Nobody examined me before on the ultrasound procedures so diligently and carefully as he did. This, still young, man - not only on his own initiative - scrupulously and skillfully drove the device's detector, simultaneously attentively looking at the monitor screen, but also with attention listened to my complaints and assumptions, surveying those zones, where, as I assumed, there could be problems. He seriously took my suggestions about possible bladder stones, and, pressing on my bladder with force, did his work as well as possible.


On my question if there were indications of bladder stones, he responded evasively that he is not authorized to disclose such information before the conclusion of the official report, but it was obvious - judging by his tone - that he is seeing zones, where bladder stones are, at least, suspected.


Then, on my initiative, let me to visit the toilet, and continued the procedure again.


He pressed the detector pad well and with skill: so - from this party - any failures could not be expected.


Additional factors, which had to prevent any incorrect result of this ultrasonography:


1. In order to avoid difficulties with the ultrasonography's result, early in the morning (before going to this procedure) I "empty" the stomach.

2. In 2 days prior to ultrasonography I took Senna tablets with the tablets of the activated carbon.

3. On February 3, 2016, my abdomen was completely empty, soft, without gases, and deeply palpable on touch, nothing had to interfere with the best scanning.

4. Since 2013, I lost a lot of weight, and, since 2014, no "fat" was left on me at all. On the contrary, from the middle of 2015, and in 2017, I was very skinny - "skin and bone" (and muscles). Stout persons are "not so well appeared through" by means of ultrasonography, but the skinny people are completely transparent (a bit of exaggeration) for the ultrasound scan.


Thus, proceeding from the described circumstances and the listed conditions, an incorrect result of the ultrasound from February 3, 2016, was absolutely improbable.


How it is possible to explain the fact that precisely in a month another scan found bladder stones, which were "not "seen" by the previous scan (ultrasonography) on February 3, 2016?


In terms of both medicine, and an echography, and in terms of any other science it is absolutely impossible.


I am absolutely sure that the true (not "twisted") 3 Feb. 2016 ultrasound's report, which included the report about the bladder stones, was available for Dr. Morris, but, simultaneously, a bogus report was forged as well, without any mention about the bladder stones.


IF Dr. Morris, NOT Dr. El-Hakim, would administrate THIS ultrasound scan, it would include the findings of the bladder stones BY DEFINITION! The only reason, why the ultrasound report from February 3, 2016, was falsified, and the findings of the bladder stones were removed from the final printout: it is because the requisition was issued NOT by Dr. Morris. No doubts that this sinister fact points to collective conspiracy of the administrative medical staff of the highest rang, while ordinary medics honestly and fairly did their work.


Then, Dr. Morris, having an access to the TRUE findings of the ultrasound from Feb., 3, 2016, and knowing about its TRUE findings (bladder stones) administrated a CT-scan: not because he was concerned about saving his patient, but for wiping out tracks. From his point of view, a serious problem of his patient, discovered by another doctor, would become his professional failure, the end of his reputation, and a blow to his hypertrophied self-esteem. Such an egoist and arrogant person as Dr. Morris could not allow this.


That's why, using his massive influence in the medical circles, Dr. Morris and the monsters, who stood behind him, organized sabotage of Dr. El-Hakim's requisitions, prescriptions, or laboratory tests' referrals: to force me to "return" back in Dr. Morris's bloody hands.


This scenario is supported by innumerous facts, documents, events, evidences, and logical conclusions.


Thus, considering a suspicious chain of acts of sabotage (August - January, 2015-2016) of my records on waiting list (for this ultrasonography) and losses of my faxes (with the requisition) in several Montreal hospitals; and also considering suspicious incidents in Montreal General Hospital before the ultrasound procedure (my file was not found during 20-30 min.; I was sent to replace still new plastic hospital card; record-breaking long time of waiting: more than 3 hours (that never happened before), etc.); and (running forward) a record-breaking delay of ultrasound's report; mistake in date indication, and other mistakes calling into question all ultrasonography's statements in general: it is possible to conclude that there is no trust in this ultrasonography's report.


Theoretically, Dr. Morris (and those who stood behind him) had real motives not to allow the identification of bladder stones, especially as not Dr. Morris, but another urologist - administrated this ultrasonography, and especially as it happened after Dr. Morris's bold refusal to channelize me on ultrasonography, and after his aggressive-offensive rejection of my suggestion about bladder stones (which he called "insinuations") - and also (offensively) refused me MRI?!


Comparing the sabotage and annihilation of the laboratory test from March, 2, 2015, with the obvious falsification of the ultrasound's (from Feb., 3, 2016) report, we see the same and similar pattern of Dr. Morris's evident motives. In both cases, both diagnostic procedures were administrated by other doctors (not by Dr. Morris) AFTER his rude refusal not only of these diagnostic procedures, but also of the medical treatment. In both cases, I passed these diagnostic procedures right AFTER my faxes and my verbal accusations against Dr. Morris, and, if the lab test and the ultrasound were positive, they would instantly support my accusations. In both cases, suggested by me self-diagnosis (acute UTI in October-March, 2015, and bladder stones in the end of 2015 - beginning of 2016) were roughly refuted by Dr. Morris, and, when the lab test and ultrasound had a chance to prove my case (my correctness), the test just disappeared, and the ultrasound was evidently sabotaged.


And unless not as reproach to Dr. Morris there would be a detection of bladder stones by the ultrasound (administrated by another urologist!) - in view of his refusal (in a sharp form) to reffer me to this diagnostic procedure, and - also - in view of the following facts:

a) Dr. Morris's stubborn and inexplicable mistrust to my complaints that pollaciuria and stranguria are combined with some episodes of olihaciuria (he did not wish "to recognize" all 3 pathologies), interruption and stream degradation (since the end of 2014); and his not less stubborn refusal (from 2012 to 2016) to appoint 2 types of alpha blockers; if he doubted about my description of symptoms, why he never administrated the uroflow test, which is the simplest and inexpensive test, why he did not administrate the post-void residual test, etc.;

b) His stubborn and not less inexplicable unwillingness "to recognize" hematuria; his stubborn mistrust to my complaints to bleedings (though the test of the office urinalysis lipstick ("litmus paper") constantly showed the presence of blood, not speaking about the obvious visual impression), which - after he saw the gross hematuria by his own eyes (already not only as an indicator of a "litmus" paper) - he began to call micro-hematuria, though it was an obvious gross hematuria.

(Dr. Morris also ignored reported by me from the very beginning suggestion about the communication of some gastroenterological (proctologic) problems with problems of his domain).

c) His stubborn mistrust to my complaints to an acute urological infection, and his stubborn refusals each time to appoint a course of antibiotics, to administrate laboratory analyses (in connection with a urological infection), and his continuous refusals within a year (since January, 2015) to appoint repeated ultrasonography exams.

d) The ultrasound scan on Dr. El-Hakim's requisition took place during a period of time, when - from March, 2015, to February, 2016 - Dr. Morris stubbornly declined any rendezvous in general, refusing to accept me in his office, despite my desperate need in an appointment with Dr. Morris, despite my innumerous requests and statements for urgency in connection with significant aggravation of my urological problems; thus, ultrasound's detection of bladder stones would be equal to an indictment against Dr. Morris (just as the sabotaged analysis of March 2, 2015, could become an indictment in connection with the refusal of laboratory analyses, ultrasound tests, and antibiotics).


That is why the ultrasonography scan from February 3, 2016, "did not see" any stones in the bladder, which were found by another scan (organized by Dr. Morris) literally in a month, and which were steadily confirmed by several following INDEPENDENT ultrasound scans, done in private medical imaging facilities, which had no access to hospitals' databases, and, therefore, had no opportunities "to rewrite" the data from hospital's records of the self-its very first result - which found stones, and no motives "to rewrite" their reports to please the authorities.


Whether it means that the ultrasonography result from February 3, 2016, was forged and that a detection of bladder stones, which - obviously - was deleted from the official report - were clearly visible on the scan?


Undoubtedly, if not to take into consideration a "half-fantastic", but, still, theoretically possible scenario, if it does not contradict the scientific medical knowledge.


It is such a nightmarish hypothesis, which probability in civilized societies approaches zero, and which might not correspond to a scientific explanation, but, in case of its possibility, it represents an even more ominous scenario.


This is a probability that there were no stones in the bladder on February 3, 2016, and that there were no stones in the bladder even a month later, but the CT-scan performed a month later in St. Mary's Hospital (where Dr. Morris works), "invented" bladder stones (which actually were not present): just as the forged Immigration fluorography (read first 2 books of this series) "invented" tuberculosis, to please Immigration medics - "policemen in plain clothes".


But, if the bladder stones were absent in February-March, how (and from where?) they could appear few months later?


These stones could appear after cystoscopy, which was carried out by Dr. Morris. In other words: Dr. Morris, an appallingly skillful doctor, found a way to put bladder stones in my bladder. I fully realize that such a far going and almost unrealistic hypothesis batter my credibility, denting confidence in this chronicle. However, this horrific supposition was born not because I acquired refinement in producing fantastic ideas, but because of a series of some horrific and - otherwise - inexplicable facts and events.


The narrative - concerning these facts and above mentioned "improbable" hypothesis - is left for the further telling.


First of all, it makes sense to compare 2 last (January, 2015, February, 2016) ultrasounds:


Abdominal and bladder ultrasound, on Dr. Morris's requisition, January 26, 2015.


Abdominal and bladder ultrasound, on Dr. El-Hakim's (non-Montreal urologist) requisition, February 3, 2016.


So, we will compare 2 ultrasonography results: on Dr. Morris's requisition, January 26, 2015, and on non-Montreal urologist requisition, February 3, 2016.


The abdominal and bladder ultrasound, administrated by Dr. Morris, from January 26, 2015: the data was, probably, read and deciphered on the same day, and printed for 2 days later: January 28, 2015.

Let's compare it to one more result: Abdominal and bladder ultrasound, on July 22, 2011: the data was read and deciphered on the same day, in 2 hours after the ultrasonography procedure.

And now we will compare these data with the data of the ultrasound (administrated by non-Montreal urologist) from February 3, 2015 (see above; following after the image of the ultrasonography report, administrate by Dr. Brian Morris):

a) The date of the ultrasonography procedure is specified incorrectly.

I underwent this ultrasonography on February 3, 2015, Wednesday, but - in the printout - it is specified: February 5, 2015 (Friday).

b) Also, a scandalous delay of reading-interpreting this ultrasonography - attracts attention: more than 3 weeks passed (nearly a month).

Whether it is possible to trust the result of an ultrasound scan, in which the date is incorrect, and the digital data of the scan got to the specialist-radiologist only in a month?


As for time, according to my data, I had to pass this ultrasonography at 13:50 (starting from 13:50-13:55), and in the official report time is specified as 13:20. In principle, time is specified almost the same, but...


The report itself is executed like the most high-quality interpretations of digital medical data of medical exams. Its style, language, persuasiveness of phrases' set correspond to an honestly done work.


It is very difficult to suspect in a forgery such an excellent official report.


However, if to believe that no bladder stones were absent on February 3, 2016, then it is necessary to agree with the previously stated "fantastic" hypothesis. Therefore, we will adhere to the working version, according to which this result after all is counterfeit.


Let's assume that the radiologist got qualified, and made the work fairly. How could he - in that case - "not to notice" bladder stones?


But whether he had my ultrasound scan before his eyes? Or he was looking at a visual digital data of an ultrasonography of another patient?


Certainly, this report bares some of my individual anatomical features, while other biometric features slightly different from the parameters, displayed by other ultrasound scans.


Interpretation of ultrasonography's data in a month after the scanning procedure - a scandalous thing in itself, - and a trend of loss of the results of my laboratory analyses and diagnostic exams: it is a rattling mix capable to break off an identity of any medical certificate on pieces. Where and how the data of mine ultrasonography was stored, and who had access to this data?


It is a pity that there is no opportunity to find out whether a monthly delay of reading an ultrasonography in this hospital - an acceptable rare practice during this period, or it with my ultrasonography happened such an atypical confusion; and, certainly, the date of the procedure was specified incorrectly: February 5, 2016, instead of February 3-rd, 2016.


I know the date - February 3, 2016 - beyond any doubt, because I have:

1) a record of phone call during which I received the date for the ultrasound procedure;

2) pictures of the "queue number" and of the new plastic hospital card;

3) record (on the same day) in mine "medical diary";

4) record in my agenda;

5) dates of digital photos, which I took that day on my way to hospital and having already come there;

6) on February, 5, 2016, I had an appointment with Dr. Sejean, and spent time at St. Mary's Hospital outpatients' clinic, far away from Montreal General Hospital; I could not be present at 2 different sites simultaneously, in the SAME time.


[Besides, the date "February 5, 2016" - as the date of my morning visit to Dr. Sejean - is mentioned in various medical documents, including the official audiologist"s report.]


Besides, in the printout of ultrasonography's report, after the standard form "No de docier local" ("Number of the Local File") - there are no figures, no identification, as there is no number of my hospital card.


In his requisition, Dr. El-Hakim made a point, emphasizing the task to check the bladder and kidneys, hinting about the bladder stones (if I correctly understood), but - in the report's conclusions section - the bladder was not mentioned at all. Such a disconnection from doctor's requisition is perplexing.


The statement that some segments were obscured by bowel gases also does not correspond the supposed reality, in my opinion.


"Bilateral mild renal pelvic fullness likely related to a full bladder" - according to one of my acquaintances-doctors, made no sense, but, even if he was wrong, it does not make sense because it does not correspond the reality: because, during last 2 and a half hours of waiting, I went to the toilet 3 times, last time - 10 or 15 min. before the ultrasound procedure.


Another strange thing is a misprint (?) or a symbol (?) /XOB//XOB/ - which I never met in any medical reports.


So, this report produces an impression of something uncommon and "not normal", starting from the wrong date and the absence of the identification in accordance with hospital's protocol, to other strange details.


My personal impression is that this report was altered and modified by a hacker, or by system's administrator, while both technician and radiologist, not excluded, properly did their job.


February 4, 2016.

On February 4, 2016 (10:15), I had an appointment with the dermatologist, Dr. Beatrice Wang.


This doctor did a lot for me, as well as Dr. Marie St-Jacque.


In the previous books and chapters, I already mentioned that - during a long period, - when I visited Dr. Marie St. Jacques, my phone was simply switched-off from the clinic of Dr. Beatrice Wang, by BELL corporation. For this reason, every time when I dialed Dr. Wang's clinic's number, I heard a mechanical voice message that such phone number does not exist.


During 12 years, Dr. Wang did many favors for me, and - if not the cost of some procedures and operations in her private clinic, - I would not have a need to visit other - free - dermatologists from time to time. And, certainly, so far, while trying to learn what happened to her clinic and its phone number, I had to address to other specialists-doctors.


February 5, 2016.

On February 5, 2016, I, at last, broke through on reception to Dr. Sejean) (St.-Mary's Hospital's OPD (C) 7th Floor).


This otolaryngologist met me hostilely already from the very first time, when he accepted me at his private office on Avenue Queen Mary.


Perhaps, his hostility was somehow connected with Dr. Morris, or with my complaints to the ombudsman of the St.-Mary's Hospital, or with something else that this doctor knows about me. Otherwise, it is impossible to explain his aggressive hostility - almost undisguised hatred - in any way. Therefore, I tried (for a long time) to pass to other otolaryngologist, but, as well as in a case with Dr. Morris, it appeared not to be so simple.


The rendezvous to Dr. Sejean was appointed at 9:45, and I came to the hospital and handled the card in the registry before anyone else.


When - in a year, - I have received "all" official reports of doctor Sejean (and the documents related to my visits to him at St. Mary's hospital) from the medical archive, it has appeared that ALL records are absent, except of one, the last: for July 7, 2017.


Where the others have gone? Have been withdrawn? Destroyed? Or, maybe, the hospital simply blocked me an access to them? Or, maybe, doctor Sejean wrote down nothing during other rendezvous, in defiance of all norms and laws?


Anyway, the complete absence (in exception of 1 only report) of doctor"s records means that both Dr. Sejean and the hospital have something to hide.


For my part, I can provide the proof concerning each rendezvous, confirming that there were 4 appointments with Dr. Sejean, not just 1, as someone wants to allege.


I have all the "waiting numbers" papers and other documents concerning these rendezvous, all recordings of my telephone conversations with the secretaries, during which I was given the rendezvous dates (for example, February 5, 2016...); the metro tickets for a trip to Dr. Sejean and back, etc.


(See above one of the "numbers" taken at the secretariat - with which I went to a rendezvous with doctor Sejean on February 5, 2016).


Besides, the date "February 5, 2016" - as the date of my visit of doctor Sejean - is mentioned in the official audiologist"s report (see below).


The copies of Dr. Sejean"s prescriptions written on hospital policlinic"s official forms also have remained by me, with the signature of Dr. Sejean, where a date is accurately specified; and the "cards" of the official forms with the dates of rendezvous and a seals, and a signature - where the number is also accurately visible. If someone planned to conceal ALL the rendezvous, except of the last one (July, 2017), there is nothing left for them to support the lie (see further).


Apropos the "number" (it originates directly from the hospital, detached by a patient at the registry, before any visit to doctor, for the purpose of registration in the registry before a rendezvous). When I sat on the corridor and waited for my turn (the nurse called patients to the office by their family names), another nurse has approached me, and has demanded to show the "number" that I was holding. She has taken it from me in her hands, has brought close to her eyes. Then the "number" was returned to me, but I think that it was replaced by another one with some unknown purpose.


The rendezvous with Dr. Sejean has been appointed on 9.45, and I have come to the hospital and have addressed with the medical card in the registry before someone else.


In the line, 2 patients of doctor Sejean have got to talking, and have told that their rendezvous has been appointed at 10:00 and at 10:30. However, doctor Sejean has called into his office everyone, except me, including those 2 patients, whose appointments were booked after 10:00 a.m., and who came to the policlinic after me.


He was examining all his patients 3-7 times "quicker", than at his private office, where he spent on everyone at least forty minutes; however, he has put a record of "high-speed" reception on me: 3 minutes.


Doctor Sejean always (no exceptions!) invited me into his office when he was writing the official reports and filled documentation on other patients. I quite could (during his literary trash, when he worked on the files of those whom he has already examined) - to continue sitting on the corridor.


In the same time, Dr. Sejean called other patients, when he already finished his writing, but not me.


Doctor Sejean told me - several times (already since our second meeting) - that my problems (the nose air pipe compression stuffs up the ears; serum jams in the ears; sharp hearing"s degradation, etc.) could solve only Dr. Rappaport, who works in the Jewish General hospital. But, when I have reminded to Dr. Sejean that to book an appointment with another otolaryngologist is impossible without a referral, and have asked him to issue a referral for a consultation (or to write out a referral directly to doctor Rappaport), Dr. Sejean has reacted to this request (for some unknown reasons) very aggressively.


When I used to enter into his office, Dr. Sejean humiliated me: he (without having answered my greeting) stood in a pointed manner with his back to me, filling official reports not less than 10-15 minutes, and, it was obvious that he deliberately "collected" this work for the time of my appointment.


The door to his office always remained open (though - at his private office - he densely closed the door behind a patient, who entered his examination room), and everyone who was sitting on the corridor could hear each word of his conversation with other patients. This looked like a deliberate humiliation over patients, who cannot pay for the visits to his private office.


That day ex-terminators [Desinsectors] - could come again at 8.00-16.00 at any time, - and I have asked doctor Sejean to examine me quicker because I have something like a force-majeure situation, but he even not turned his head to my side at all, completely ignoring my request and not manifesting his reaction in any way.


He also ignored my request for a referral to a hematologist in connection with bloody discharges from the nose. He simply did not answer at all.


As to the hearing damage, it is necessary to point to some additional facts.


Approximately, 3-4 months prior to January 7, 2013, I have noticed that 2 or 3 times - when I approached to the salon"s window, I felt a kind of a pressure as though the air became elastic, and pressed on my face. It was accompanied by a short-term deterioration of health which right there passed as soon as I went on a corridor or to the kitchen. All these cases took place when the jalousie has been mostly lifted up, so, that almost nothing was covering the window. After these incidents I noted some short-term (though, probably, and long-term) - as it seemed to me - deterioration of hearing. Not casually in my fax to doctor Sejean I mentioned 2012 as the beginning of hearing"s degradation. But after the vertigo on January 7, 2013, there was a sharp degradation of hearing, and I wrote to friends, and mentioned it in one of my chronicle versions.


About gravity of this deterioration also tells the comparative conclusions of the 1-st audiology text (2005) - and the 2-nd (2015) (see in the section for the corresponding period chronologically).


This comparison shows that if at the beginning of 2000-s my hearing was completely in norm, after 2013 there was a sharp and serious loss of hearing at the level of partial disability (partial deafness).


It is possible to assume that the radiation, to which, probably, I was exposed on January 7, 2013, has led to brain"s injury, which, in turn, has caused the sharp decrease in hearing.


That day ex-terminators [Desinsection] could come at any time again - from 8:00 till 16:00, - and I asked doctor Sejean to examine me quicker because I have something like a force majeure situation, but he did not even turn the head in my party, and did not react to my request in any way. He also ignored my request to direct me to the specialist hematologist in connection with bloody discharges from a nose.


10 - 20 February, 2016.


February 16, 2016.

On February, 16, 2016, I was on reception at the gastroenterologist (10:45).


Again, I spoke to him about communicating with Dr. Morris about the gastroenterological problems, but the doctor could offer nothing, except another colonoscopy. But Dr. Szego gave me (for me) a referral to Royal Victoria Hospital's urologist, and this opened for me an opportunity to pass from Dr. Morris to another expert. Dr. Szego told me to register this referral in the gastroenterology secretariat, and they will take care of the appointment with the urologist.


I was weighting my plans to return to my former urologist (Dr. El-Hakim), but such an option was also scary, because his prescriptions, referrals, and requisitions were sabotaged by medical institutions, and, additionally, panic covered me as soon as I remembered how 2 police cars blocked me the way, when I went from the high-speed road to the neighborhood of the medical building with Dr. El-Hakim's office. I was almost squeezed between 2 police cars, which stopped across the street - and it was the most obvious act of intimidation. Whatever softer is the police in Quebec (especially in Montreal) than in other states, facing the police in any country can terminate in an absolutely unpredictable way, and sometimes it is fatal. And that event was one of the most frightening moments. I could not break this psychological barrier, and, therefore, decided to resume attempts to find a urologist in Montreal, alternative to Dr. Morris.


The picture that I saw in the new policlinic of new Royal Victoria Hospital - is worthy of artist's brushes.


People waited for 3-5 hours; with all lacked places in the waiting room, and old men and women of very advanced age, disabled people, and those, who suffered from intolerable pain, and all others, who could not stand: were subjected to real torture, because to stand even for half an hour for many of them was a torture.


There was a lack of sitting places for half of the patients, who had to wait for the appointment standing along the walls.


Thus, there were not only no improvements of conditions for patients in comparison with the old historical Royal Victoria Hospital, but, on the contrary, everything became much worse. The new enormous super-hospital was needed only for a backdoor for dirty money laundering, for transforming the 19-th - beginning of 20-th century former historical buildings of Royal Victoria Hospital into exclusive condominiums for super rich, and for destroying Montreal's historical architecture, which was demolished on the level of the cultural genocide by extremist-atheists, by anti-Christian activists, by anti-European (and "anti-white") aggressive racists, by bloody banks and construction mafia, and by the worshippers of the satanic cult.


Since the end of February, 2016, the most serious constipations (which I connected with both urological and gastroenterological problems), menacing by the most destructive consequences, began. No alternative, "folk", herbal, dietary, or "house" remedies helped.


I spoke about this problem both to the gastroenterologist, Dr. Szego, and to Dr. Morris, but Dr. Szego only prescribed 2 medications (without solving the roots of this problem, or referring to another endoscopy (because the result of the previous endoscopy has disappeared without any traces), and Dr. Morris just ignored my questions.


CHAPTER 4. March 1-18, 2016.


MARCH, 2016.


March 3, 2016.

From January, 2015, to February, 2016, I had several outbreaks of urological infection of different intensity, and, at the end of February, 2016, I was utterly frightened by simultaneous hematuria - hematochezia and other symptoms prognosticating nothing good (not to mention the torments caused by these disorders, such - as "urological" pains, susceptible abscess of the uterus, general unwell and sickness, and back pain with radiation pain into the lower part of the stomach).


Therefore, I prepared messages for 3 medical specialists.


I asked for a blood test (CBC, PSA, etc.); urine test, including microbial culture; transrectal ultrasound; computer tomography of the abdominal area and bladder; swab test; and antibiotics.


An only answer arrived from Dr. Morris. His secretary contacted me and told that the doctor could refer me to the procedures demanded by me, but only if I "go private" (i.e. if I will pass them as a private patient, i.e. for big money), meaning that I have to pay for every procedure from my own pocket.


Even a requisition on blood and urine count tests were refused by Dr. Morris on the basis of public healthcare venues. Perfectly knowing about my socioeconomic status, and fully realizing that I don't have even a slightest opportunity to cover any payable medical procedure, Dr. Morris just mocked at me, de-masking his sadistic nature.


However, I was given an opportunity to see the doctor at once, immediately, which never happened before. This is just another hint that Dr. Morris was informed about the true findings of the 3 Feb. 2016 ultrasound, and knew about the bladder stones. He, supposedly, had an access to a secret ultrasound's report, which for me for all other parties the system was issuing a different printout. If to support above-mentioned "fantastic" hypothesis, in that case, Dr. Morris just entangled me in the trap by offering a walk-in immediate appointment.


Here emerged next 2 strange and suspicious details. By threatening to deny further medical help, Dr. Morris compelled me to say OK to cystoscopy, but, revising my decision, I quickly cancelled it, facing unprecedented rage and aggressive reaction of Dr. Morris. The cystoscopy was scheduled on March 3, 2016. Now, instead of fulfilling his threat, Dr. Morris invited me to his office, however, not on any "random" date - but on this particular date of the cancelled cystoscopy (March 3). This was a perfidious hint, which could be considered equal to punishment. Another strange circumstance is a rapid and unexpected worsening of my state exactly on March 3, 2016: one a long series of similar coincidences. This rapid worsening on the same date as the cancelled cystoscopy, and on the same date, on which Dr. Morris wanted to see me, sent shivers to my skin. This sudden deterioration also impeded my ability to visit non-Montreal doctor El-Hakim, because (as was explained above) I had problems to travel to faraway Point-Clair.


Meanwhile, the situation became alarming; I needed an urgent medical help; with every hour, I felt more and more unwell. And, still, I did not want to turn for help to Dr. Morris.


This was the 1-st time, when I fully and clearly realized that Dr. Morris is not a doctor, but an enemy, whose goal is to destroy me, and, now, I abundantly cracked all his tricks and methods.


This is why I decided to go to Point-Clair, to Dr. El-Hakim, and never address myself to Dr. Morris again. My only hesitation was connected to supposition that, if there are bladder stones, then they might be never diagnosed on Dr. El-Hakim's requisitions, which will be sabotaged by hospitals, while I have no money for private ultrasounds and CT-scans.


But, if even so, my decision not to see the atrocious Dr. Morris was firm and final.


What influenced my tragic decision to go by Metro (couple of stops) to Dr. Morris, instead of going to the suburb of Montreal to my former urologist (Dr. El-Hakim)?


What forced me to change my - seemingly firm - decision not to deal any more with that doctor, whose arrogance and hypertrophied ego does harm his patients?


Of course, a trip by Metro and buses with two changes, which can take up to 2 hours, in health condition, having simultaneous hematuria - hematochezia, urgency, frequency, and other disorders, could frighten even a hero, but, besides my unpracticality and inability to deal with the everyday challenges among strangers, an additional factor was, probably, the beginning of depression, which I never experienced in my life, and, consequently, had no experience to count on its influence on spontaneous actions.


However, there was a number of additional difficulties and reasons, which created an impassable wall between me - and Point-Clair.


Without having managed to phone to non-Montreal urologist (Dr. El-Hakim, whose phone line was all the time busy), I did not even know whether he works these days, or he left on vacation; whether he works in the first or in the second half of the day; and whether he will accept me without a booked in advance appointment.


At the thought of a visit to an emergency department, I was overwhelmed by horror (after all mockeries, to which I was exposed).


Such was a psychologically impassible situation.


But - in a usual situation - I, nevertheless, would make attempts to contact Dr. El-Hakim's office, calling him all the day on March 3, 2016, till 18:00-19:00, trying to reach him by all means.


Unfortunately, the situation was not usual.


I had a fever; kidney and bladder pain; general weakness; recent bleeding and related to it fear; and other factors forced me to act in a manner, uncharacteristic for me.


It is already necessary to add to this, that, perhaps, it was a beginning of depression, also provoked by Dr. Morris and other sinister personalities; even there were still first weak symptoms; and the panic, which covered me at the thought of police intimidation in Point-Clair, where Dr. El-Hakim is practicing (and, especially that case, when 2 police cars blocked me the way - see above) drove me into terror.


So I appeared at Dr. Morris again...


When I arrived to his office on March 3, 2016 at 16:20, I was allowed almost immediately, despite the presence of other patients with the planned visits.


I was touched by that, but also scared, because, it appeared, the doctor could consider my state as an opportunity for something beyond my understanding.


And, really, he - first of all - convinced me to give my consent to cystoscopy, and was ready to organize a visit of a "very good" gastroenterologist: if I will agree to IMMEDIATE colonoscopy.


He also signed a referral on urgent computer tomography: a very unusual act of him.


However, he refused my demand of laboratory blood and urine tests again. This time, I did not start a discussion about prostatitis and the uterus abscess, because - in the past - he always became angry, having hardly caught about these suggestions. I did not touch this topic also because all symptoms so obviously indicated them.


Next day, I cancelled cystoscopy and refused colonoscopy.


The CT-scan of abdominal area and bladder was appointed to March 8, 2016.


Actions of Dr. Morris on March 3, 2016, generate the whole swarm of questions.


What forced him to react so quickly and with a paramount urgency?


Why he ignored all my requests for an urgent rendezvous in August, 2015, and in January, 2016, when I also reported about similar considerable bleedings, and about other dangerous symptoms, but - on March 3, 2016, - still even not seeing me and without having examined me, he gave an order to his secretary to accept me urgently, and - again - when I already came to the medical Westmount center, why he accepted me with such a haste, before others: patients with the planned visits?


From where did he know about the urgency / emergency of my situation?


Why he, in the past ignoring visible blood in a sample and the rectal bleedings, never mentioned hematuria his requisitions and prescriptions, or, 1-2 times indicated "micro-hematuria", THIS time wrote "hematuria" in his referral to computer tomography, and, in one of accompanying papers, even added +++ (3 pluses!)?


In the past, he, seeing a sample full of blood, stubbornly wrote down "micro-hematuria".


He - since 2012 - rejected all my assumptions about the links of my urological problems with inflammation and vascular problems in the "neighboring" tract, about the initial infection, and also about possible calcification, but this time - by administrating simultaneously both cystoscopy and colonoscopy, - he confirmed himself my oral and written assumptions.


Why Dr. Morris, who was permanently denying problems of bladder emptying, and treated with mistrust my statements that such problem exists since June or December, 2015, and who always refused to prescribe Flomax, THIS time - suddenly (urgently!) prescribed Flomax on March 16, 2016?


And, at last, why he, who so many times ignored my requests about computer tomography of bladder and abdomen, now - on an own initiative - administrated a CT-scan, and, at the same time, organized an URGENT appointment of this procedure, what is possible only "on protection" or for money?


Dr. Morris's referral to doctor Kinnik, March 3, 2016; it is visible that he estimated bleeding as +++.


[Editorial remark: Running forward: after 2 urological surgical operations not only hematuria, but also hematochezia completely disappeared forever. All proctology-related problems have gone in general. This is the best evidence that the suggested link was real.]


All this is easily explainable if we assume that the original result of ultrasonography from February 3, 2016, did not gone completely, and was replaced by an incomplete "cut-down" report with an incorrect date "February 5, 2016" only for "profane persons", whereas Dr. Morris received a full result of ultrasonography - where it was told, among other findings, bout the bladder stones found by this scan.


Then everything keeps within a logical row.


It they hid the detection of bladder stones from me and from my non-Montreal urologist (Dr. El-Hakim), but Dr. Morris and Co* had an access to full - not censored - result of ultrasonography, it fits into the general picture.


I believe that the repeated episodes of hematochezia - an essential hematuria, and prostatic bleedings: are explained by the recurrent infections, which were followed by uterus abscess, gastroenterological factors with partial obstruction, and vascular problems of varicose veins.


No cystoscopy was required because of obvious evidence of an unhappy combination (as main source of bleedings and recurrent infections) of the above-mentioned infection, abscess, the vascular and muscular pattern of lower parts of intestines pathology, accompanying them (which promoted an obstruction of evacuation of bowels' content), and constipations. The main thing that was necessary: ultrasonography, with repetition in due time, and other exams capable to detect the abscess and other pathologies.


Most probable that in the end of 2014, when Dr. Morris began to insist on a cystoscopy, it would reveal nothing yet - because the obstruction and calcification of the uterus outlet began later, approximately at the end of 2015 - and - probably - as a result of my laboratory analyses and other diagnostic procedures sabotage, and as a result of the "retaliatory" approach of Dr. Morris to my treatment.


Dozens of my requests for empirical treatment of prostatitis steadily deviated, and all my assumptions were derided and rejected.


The uterus abscess could never resolve completely not only because of numerous refusals of antibiotics, but also because of non-CORRECT antibiotics (or their incorrect doze). As known, the recurrent infection of urinary tract causes dysfunction of the sheaf uric bladder-uterus, and a problem of depletion (emptying). Because of stagnation, the bladder content becomes a source of further infections and stones formations in urological path. To a certain extent, it can be settled by large consumption of liquids and depletion as soon as possible, but social and family life sets it to a limit - and visa-versa. To reduce this problem, doctors administrate alpha blockers (as Flomax), relaxants and anti-inflammatory (as Celebrex). However, this tactic worked not really successfully for me in past years, when another urologist prescribed both medicine. But, nevertheless, they gave some positive effect if not their side effects' full incompatibility with public and social life. Therefore, even without, or with very moderate hyperplasia - they did not give essential advantages. Only in due time and correctly appointed course of antibiotics (as a supplement) the treatment could restore my health during limited periods.


An only hopeful conservative method, as underline academic books, was (in my case) administration of 2 types of alpha-blockers (like Flomax and Finasteride), Celebrex, repeated course of antibiotics, correct smart advises, physiotherapy, and some other approaches in a complex treatment. Dr. El-Hakim applied that strategy almost at full scale, and I had good chances to recover, if not my social life and professional activity (which forced to stop Flomax from time to time, and created situations, when I had no chance to visit toilet for hours); my very low socioeconomic status; police intimidation, and other oppressive methods of political persecutions employed by the authorities; sabotage of Dr. El-Hakim's prescriptions by pharmacies; sabotage of my telephone line by telephone companies (owing to what I could not book appointments in time), and sabotage of ultrasounds and lab tests.


It is unknown, why Dr. El-Hakim never prescribed hypertrophy-reducing alpha-blockers, like Finasteride; maybe, he had no authorization for such a prescription, or it was reserved only for "special people", or he considered Finasteride's risks for me reweighting the benefits. Or, maybe, when I became Dr. El-Hakim's patient, the hypertrophy was already so significant - that there were no much chances that this remedy would do a difference.


Is it not strange - that, in contradiction to all recognized methods, and even within a conflict with medical protocols, - Dr. Morris did not wish to prescribe alpha blockers - and did it only under the pressure of my insistances and after the result of the CT-scan, which found stones in the bladder?


(Whether a cystoscopy, which might be carried out 1-3 years ago, could prevent formation of stones, having found this process at a very early stage? First, according to 6 or 7 ultrasonography results, there were no bladder stones in last years; and, secondly, Dr. Morris could administrate a CT-scan (a bit more sensitive for detecting bladder stones than ultrasound) 6 months ago, or 1-2 years ago, taking into account the significant hematuria and my complaints to (appearing from time to time) the problem of bladder emptying).


It happened, that I came to Dr. Morris, or to other doctors, or to emergency departments with terrible "urological" dermatitis, with obvious orchitis and epididymitis, and (or) with other obvious infections of the urinary tract organs, but I was expelled from doctors' offices and sent home without any medical care.


Despite dozens of urinalysis and others analyses, the nature of the main infection and its carrier remained "secret".


As I emphasized above, results of many analyses disappeared, or there was not a whole set of pages of the lab test: some or most of the pages were missing.


Few urinalyses, which found an infection, were done on requisition of doctors, who were practicing outside of Montreal, or I passed them in the laboratories outside of Montreal.


Why it happened so that (I was repeatedly refused a swab test: during 15 years of serious disease and continuous deteriorations?


Why - within 15 years - no official medical diagnosis was proclaimed (since January 1, 2001)?


When I asked doctors, what is wrong, what is the diagnosis, they always referred to an acute temporary "problem".


Inevitably you come to a conclusion that - in Canada - critical patient's remarks about one doctor lead his and his colleagues' refusal to provide medical help in general, to administrate lab analyses, medical exams and procedures, and to prescribe essential medications in time, especially refusing such medications, which prescription could confirm critical statements of the patient, eventually, directly or indirectly.


Just because I complained about the refusals to treat a bacterial urological infection, the most important results of microbiology ("culture"), within the analyses administrated in connection with obvious infection's symptoms - were "lost" or removed from the medical database.


(Possibly, almost full impunity of Canadian medics was imposed by a ticklish situation because of a big difference between the salaries of doctors in Canada - and to the south of Canadian border. The universal, humanitarian and accessible local health care system can offer much smaller personal income to Canadian doctors, than the health care system privatized and focused on money-making in the neighboring state, and many Canadian health workers move to the States that causes "deficiency" of doctors, nurses, and other health workers.

Many of those who remain and work with patients, whose health insurance becomes covered only by the Free Medical Care Card - are enthusiasts and altruists.

In the past, for the risk connected with their profession and for indirect loss of income (in comparison with situation south of Canadian border) they were compensated by this "special approach" (impunity), which served, perhaps, for advantage of all citizens, bringing more benefits, than harm.

Unfortunately, in a modern situation, when the health care system began to treat less privileged Canadian citizens with obvious inequality and negligence; when the available to all social groups of Canadian population health care does not work anymore; and when the oppressive enforcement agencies began to use the opportunities - given by inviolability and incompetence of medics - as a cover for their own crimes, this impunity turns into inviolability for executioners).


It is curious that, having organized an urgent computer tomography (which is not so easy to achieve), Dr. Morris did not wish to arrange an urgent assessing-report (such an inquiry-demand is a simple routine task within an ordinary procedure, and does not require any efforts). Why? His secretary gave me a coupon on a visit to Dr. Morris for March 31, 2016, when, supposedly, "the answer of the computer tomography is received".


It means that, having arranged an urgent abdominal-pelvic CT-scan, Dr. Morris, in general, did not care about an urgency at all, wasting almost entire month since the date of computer tomography procedure (March, 3, 2016). Moreover, he delayed an appointment after this "urgent" CT-scan for 1 month - IN ADVANCE, disregarding a possibility that CT-scan report can be ready in 5 days, or in 2 weeks, or in 17-18 days. Instead of calling me in when the CT-scan report will arrive, Dr. Morris decided to put off 1 entire month, without bothering about any urgency.


This is an indication that Dr. Morris did not care about me (his patient), but arranged this urgent CT-scan because of his personal egoistic motives. He would consider the diagnosis "bladder stones" set by another doctor as his professional failure, and, therefore, rushed as crazy to be the first. I believe that he was motivated not by a threat, not by his eventual reputation's corruption, but by his internal abstract self-greatness, which could be hurt, or, in other words, destroyed if he would feel his own purposelessness.


.....................


The initial urological infection ictus happened on January 1, 2001, against the background of my conflict with Immigration Medical Services (IMS) around a falsified "tubercular" fluorography. Its original image, and even its medical report, was "hidden" from "civil" doctors, was made classified (!), and declared "missing" later.


Even an immediately arranged alternative "civil" X-ray, which completely disproved an absurd insinuation of IMS doctors about "tuberculosis", did not "sober up" (delusion) Immigration officials, who continued insisting on tubercular "treatment" and threatened by imprisonment for not surrendering to Infectious Diseases Unit.


Another conflict developed around an alleged blood test insinuated by Immigration, which I never passed, never heard about, never paid for it, and which was never registered.


Without any logical connection with the "tubercular" case, I began to be threatened with "an infection of urogenital ways (UTI)": for my refusal "to treat tuberculosis".


Strangely, but almost right after these threats the infection really materialized, and (strange coincidence!) in the 1-st day of new year.


The test at Dr. Zigmund Zast's office confirmed the infection. (ALL components of an acute infection were to the fore).


However, Dr. Zast was advised by Immigration (actually, by my former Immigration doctor, Wanda Brzezinska) not to prescribe antibiotics, and the laboratory analysis made next day, contradicted the office test, and I did not receive antibiotics treatment.


The only reasonable conclusion: not cured, the infection caused prostatitis, forming the joint center of inflammation of lower parts of intestines and uterus.


For success of the solution of this problem, a system approach was needed, and it could be solved only from "both approaches".


First of all - a sufficient antibiotics treatment was required, against particular microorganism (s), and with the right dosage.


I told about this to many doctors, including Z., P., P., R. and others, but my assumptions were ignored or derided.


In 2003, I already had a kidney cyst: apparently, because of chronic UTI.


Ignoring my complaints and manifesting mistrust to my description of symptoms, doctors cruelly responded by systematic refusals of medications and tests; all this could be a fruit of some remarks and notes in my medical file in the medical system, which appeared there as a result of the above-mentioned conflict with IMS (Immigration medics).


"Kind Samaritans" among medics pointed to me to "unethical information" in my medical file concerning "social behavior", "social" and "mental" "disorders", allegedly, observable during my contacts with medical institutions and doctors.


It is possible to assume that for these exactly reasons (in spite of all my verbal and written appeals to Dr. Morris, in which I tried to summarize the following important facts), that the most important complains - urgency, frequency, nocturia, uterus and bladder pain, dysuria, disruption (since 2015), simultaneous hematochezia-hematuria after cystoscopy / colonoscopy; rectal pain at night (during sleep); simultaneous urgency of bladder emptying and intestines; burning and itching; bleedings and general "urologic" pain - were completely ignored up to March 3, 2016.


On July 20, 2011, a non-Montreal doctor (who was replacing Dr. El-Hakim) administratrf a laboratory analysis with microbiology (bacterial culture), and it revealed Enterococcue faelalie under the same circumstances (hematos.+hematuria+haematochezia).


Since 2003, I already had bleedings (urinary+rectal), mutations of transit cells epithelium, and, later, BPE.


Some tests found the abnormal (long) thrombocytes in the results of CBC, which are often connected with a dangerous chronic infection (see: Alice Assinger, 'Platelets and infection - an emerging role of platelets in viral infection'). Hidden viral infections often (or, as a rule) accompanying chronic bacterial infections.


For years, the results of repeated blood-urine and ultrasound tests, cytology, cystoscopy, colonoscopy, etc. - did not find significant pathologies, but were shown a graduate degradation and were signaling the increasing and multiplying problems. In spite of such a very clear picture, doctors did not announce any diagnosis; did not prescribe any treatment; did not administrate any additional tests. Only Dr. El-Hakim - at least - tried to do something, but his efforts were sabotaged by pharmacies, and by oppressive enforcement agencies. Despite the evident tendency, doctors did not offer neither conservative, nor surgical treatment.


Concerning the secondary effects of urology-related disorders and the UTI recurrent outbreaks, few times in 15 years, Dr. Rohan saved me from greater troubles, few times doctors from smaller walk-in clinics, and 2-3 times - doctors from bigger walk-in clinics. I must also express my gratitude to owners and employers of small private pharmacies (not part of corporate chains), for their human approach. As soon as practically all small independent pharmacies literary disappeared in Montreal, the sabotage of doctors' prescriptions became an everyday practice. The informers and provokers - agents, working in big pharmacies or their branches for Harper-Trudeau oppressive regime - were engaged in blocking my access to a number of medications, and in disputing doctors' prescriptions. However, I want to express my special gratitude to the owners, administration, senior staffs, and to the overwhelming majority of employees of 3 pharmacies, which (especially since 2016) proved real care and highest humanitarian mission's approach, despite SYSTEM's post-humanitarian policy.


I am indebted to altruistic doctors, nurses, pharmacists, medical technicians, physiotherapists, and other generous medical workers, who supported and followed the noble mission of their profession in opposition to the increasing cruelty of the punitive health care system, which motto became "not to heal, but to kill".


Unfortunately, no efforts and care of nice people within the medical system could mitigate the destructive impact of system's monstrous sadistic orientation, and of moral freaks in the white medical gowns.


Summarizing the above mentioned, the conclusion reads as follows: the sad development during the 1-st period of this health drama supports the idea of consequences mainly of the bacterial infection, which caused the major problems of my health.


Could be assumed complications of non-treated UTI, proctitis, prostatitis, and uterus abscess. Imperceptible for cystoscopy or colonoscopy, these problems could be defined and surveyed by means of flexible endoscope (rectoromanoscopia), transrectal ultrasonography, computer tomography, digital exams, correct (not forged) and complete urine tests (with all components!), or MRI.


Such infectious "combination" explains destructive, almost catastrophic complications caused by cystoscopy and colonoscopies.


In 2003, the very first urologist, Dr. Pharand, forced me to agree to cystoscopy, having said that - without it - he stops all consultations, and advices me to find another urologist. As for 2 years, since 1-st Jan. 2001, I could not get an appointment with a urologist, and managed to see Dr. Pharand in the very end of 2002 (?) after a real fight with the whole medical bureaucracy, his threat was really painful. Therefore, I was - naturally - scared by Dr. Pharand's menace, and was forced to pass cystoscopy because of his blackmail. This procedure became a catastrophe. Within 2 weeks, I was suffering from a terrible infection. Doctor Pharand, however, refused to offer an urgent walk-in appointment. After 4 days of disease, I went to Royal Victoria Hospital's Emergency Room, but - after 12 nightmarish hours of waiting in the overcrowded waiting room, on tormenting (chosen by sadists) cheap chairs, or on the bare floor (when there were no free sits) - I was kicked out without even seeing a doctor.


It is possible that the cystoscopy and its complications left me with the stricture and chronic bacterial prostatitis.


The same scenario repeated at the end of March / beginning of April, 2016, when another urologist - this time Dr. Morris - forced me to pass cystoscopy again, threatening (like Dr. Pharand, just more feloniously) that, otherwise, he will not operate me (i.e. will refuse to remove bladder stones, which most likely formed due to his fault [because of its refusal of both conservative and surgical treatment, his refusal to appoint necessary diagnostic procedures, and his recommendation "to drink less liquids"]).


After cystoscopy, which caused the most serious complication (and Dr. Morris perfectly foresaw and understood that, by administrating the cystoscopy and refusing to appoint a preventive course of antibiotics - he will inevitably infect bladder stones), - Dr. Morris denied any assistance, consultations (even via phone interviews), urgent walk-in rendezvous, laboratory analyses, and adequate therapy, while laboratory tests and an adequate therapy were sabotaged also by medical institutions. This egregious case of the criminal medical "treatment" (mistreatment) of the "concentration camp" style convincingly proves the bias, employed towards me in Montreal's medical institutions, and the fact that I am viewed as a prisoner of war or an enemy by some high-positioned people within the system of medical care.


The logic of common sense speaks about an amazing contradiction between Dr. Morris's immediate and extraordinary reaction to my message at the end of February - beginning of March, 2016, about a deterioration attack (and to news about the bladder stones (which do not pose a direct life threat (in the initial stage) - and his surprising indifference to the heaviest post-cystoscopy infection crises (which quickly developed into life-threatening complications), with his refusal to see me due to these complications.


The same contradiction is also can be seen in his ignoring - for several years - my requests to coordinate diagnostics and treatment with Dr. Szego - and his urgent referral (on March 3, 2016) to his friend and former neighbor - famous gastroenterologist, Dr. Kinnik, if I agree for an urgent colonoscopy.


The contradiction is seen also in Dr. Morris's refusal of empirical treatment of chronic prostatitis, etc. - whereas he carried out routine exams, which certainly signaled about periodic abscesses of the uterus (not mentioning the comparison of several ultrasonographies, which revealed a periodic sharp reduction of hyperplasia and its episodic fluctuations between almost 80 - and 40 (almost twice), and back).


In last years, the indifference, lack of any reaction of Dr. Morris to my complaints and assumptions - forced me to formulate them briefly in writing, sending my messages to him by fax. However, he - all the same - disregarded both the description of symptoms (which, I hoped, can help [even without exams] to make the correct diagnosis), and the requests for diagnostic procedures, and appeals for coordination with my gastroenterologist, and requests about alpha blockers and other medications.


Therefore, quite naturally, I was surprised to the fact that - on March 3, 2016 - Dr. Morris authorized my urgent visit and organized urgent procedures.


It was, after all, the same doctor, who told me - on December 11, 2015 - that "Antibiotics are not allowed for you any more"; who repeatedly abused me claiming that I, allegedly, "waste public money", "doing "too many laboratory analyses", each of which "costs 500 Canadian dollars"; the same doctor, who started to tear into pieces - on March 2, 2015 - the copy of the ultrasound's printout, which, in combination with other tests, proved that the hyperplasia "instantly" increases and also quickly decreases without any medications' or other medical intervention: that prompts about an abscess (by then, he so violently crossed out the printed words "hypertrophied ureter" in the report - that broke off paper); the same doctor, who teared into pieces another medical document during another appointment.


On March 2, 2015, I said to Dr. Morris that one of the problems has amplified (strangury on medical terminology), that - again - there is an acute UTI, and, perhaps, acute uteritis, and asked him to prescribe antibiotics and arrange blood-urine lab tests, including the microbiology culture, but the refused everything. [And, by the way, this is another in the series of strange coincidences: that I had 2 recurrences of acute UTI, which began on the same day: on March 2, 2015, and on March, 2, 2016.]


So, how to explain that Dr. Morris assessed my problems on March 2, 2015, and on March 3, 2016 (when I came to his medical office with the same symptoms) with the diametrically opposite antipodal reaction (to the same symptoms). Again, an only supposition that is capable to explain such a reaction - is that he knew something very different in March 2016, and this "something" can be only his knowledge about a "classified", hidden content of ultrasound's findings (Feb., 2016).


Can we assume that it was his reaction to my visit my former (non-Montreal) urologist, who signed a requisition for ultrasonography? But it happened already the 3-rd time, when I addressed to 3 other urologists when could not receive from Dr. Morris a positive response on my requests. Why on 2 previous occasions he did not react in this way?


The joint gross hematuria-hematochezia also happened already the 3-rd time directly in Dr. Morris's office, and he did not react to it IN ANY WAY. So, whatever arguments we would not get over, nothing explains uncharacteristic for him (in my case) efficiency and recognition of the gravity of situation, except the assumption that there were 2 versions of February ultrasound's report, one of which ("classified", "hidden") mentioned bladder stones.


On March 3, 2016, and during the next - urgent - visit to Dr. Morris, I was struck by his expression of excited satisfaction - almost a pleasure - in his eyes, in his face: by this unexpected reaction to the dramatic turn (deterioration) of my state, and - then - on news of bladder stones, detected by CT. Among the shadows of the expression on his face slipped even something like a triumph, but kind of momentary - as sunlight on a fraction of second flashing over a dense overcast.


And, though Dr. Morris was a very secretive person, it seemed to me that sometimes I successfully read in him the shades of deeply hidden emotions.


And it seemed to me that his joyful triumph was nothing else, but a pleasure of a maniac-sadist, who managed to catch an escaping victim, and was overwhelmed by a joy to start another round of tortures. Or, at least, it was a joy of somebody, who committed serious crimes, and, filling remorse, was satisfied by an opportunity to repair the damage, which he - himself - inflicted.


If I correctly read his state, he rejoiced an opening opportunity "to correct" his faults by the means of manipulations in such area, in which it is one of the bests: in the domain of medical surgery. However, this "medical" joy was overshadowed in him by a sadistic satisfaction of a very different nature.


It is probable that - as a very reserved person, he could, on one hand (because of his obstinacy, arrogance and egoism), ignore all my assumptions and self-diagnoses, oppose to all my requests and to treat with mistrust all my complaints and descriptions of symptoms, which, certainly, provoked a considerable harm to my health, and, on the other hand, he could perceive a radical deterioration in my health state from 2012 to 2016 (i.e. during his management of my problems) as his professional insolvency. He, theoretically, could be wounded by it, undermining his haughty self-confidence: nearly main anchor of his psychological comfort.


And now he felt an opportunity to restore his professional profilerancy. Besides, securing me as his patient in his arms, Dr. Morris also restored his opportunity to undertake all necessary steps and tricks of concealment and cover up, erasing all tracks of his medical responsibility for undermining his patient's health, and this is why (as it is possible to assume) he began to act so quickly and operatively - for preventing me from addressing to other specialists-urologists. Such a radical change in his behavior was shown also by the fact that he stopped hiding (closing) from me the office lipstick urinalysis "litmus paper", and I saw that hematuria and infection are confirmed (brown color - nitrites; greenish - proteins, etc.).


Dr. Morris and his secretary channelized me to a gastroenterologist (to Dr. Kinnik), but only on a condition that agree to pass an immediate colonoscopy, which I refused, being afraid of traumatizing the pathways already injured by bleeding; and - as a result - the probability of fatal bleeding in this situation was very high. The irritation and the (pathological) state of the blood vessels and epithelium was already present due to near catastrophic constipations, and a very invasive medical procedure could lead to a major damage in this already dangerous situation. Plus, in such a situation, an infection could be transferred from one place to another, and could cause unpredictable consequences. (An opportunistic infection.)


My requests to replace colonoscopy with flexible endoscopy came across total rejection. Who knows what would happen if I agreed?


March 8, 2016.

On March 8, 2016: abdominal-pelvic CT-Scan (computer tomography) [St.-Mary's Hospital, 1-st floor, 14:15]. Besides curious coincident of 2 UTI recurrences on the same dates 2 years in a row, and Dr. Morris's appointments on the same dates in 2015-2016, the CT-scan was appointed on International Women's Day (for Satanists: also their holiday).


On my way to hospital, I was escorted by police.


During the procedure of computer tomography there were several suspicious moments (as it is noted in my notebook).


Here is the report (see below) of the abdominal-pelvic computer tomography (8 Mar. 2016):


CT-scan 8 March, 2016. Page 1 (above).


CT-scan 8 March, 2016. Page 2 (above).


And, finally, the image of requisition (see below), which reflects a number of additional details, in the same time, hiding a number of details, because some of Dr. Morris's writings are unreadable (like: PT: with con... (?), or Comments: Cr... (?). In the same time, these are the most important details:


The summary of this computer tomography looks rather suspicious, but - as I removed (painted over) - the confidential information, I can call only SOME of the doubtful moments.


They are:

A statement that there are "multiple stones" - lack of their exact or estimated (approximate) number. This statement is contradicted by an "antipodal" information on the exact size of the "biggest of them".


The whole statement "There are multiple stones in the dependent aspect of the bladder (...)" is even more bewildered. Why the interpreters refused to name the exact bladder area, hiding it under the masking phrase "in the dependent aspect of the bladder": as if the precise area was made a secret?!


The next suspicious element is finding, which was never supported by CT and ultrasound scans in the following years. For security reasons, I covered it by the black paint. Of course, it still possible that this CT-scan was performed by a more professional technician, and was interpreted by a more professional radiologist, and this is why the later medical imaging exams did not confirm this finding. However, it worth keeping it in the mind anyways.


No further CT and Ultrasound scans confirmed a stone in the right kidney. It is also looks suspicious, because 1 mm stone could not just "disappear" or "dissolve". And, still, it is possible that this contradiction may be explained by a higher professional level of THESE examiners.


Questions appear about the incomplete "History" line, where can be seen only "Hematuria". As a rule, History line is always lists / copy ALL requisition's "History" statements.


A remark about the non-specific lymph nodes corresponds to immune system reaction to acute infection, and do not arose any suspicions.


However, the "Conclusion" section is lacking a statement about the l. kidney syst. This is not typical for such reports.


And, still, all above mentioned small mistakes and inconsistences can be explained by the haste, because this was an urgent CT-scan, and they had too little time. In other words, we may deal with the common small human errors when people work under pressure. It is also possible that (in McGill medical centers) a special protocol exists to regulate acceptable small mistakes while scooping on the major health problem during emergency exams.


Even the controversial report about bladder stones unspecified number (while affirming an exact size of one of them!) could be explained by some technical specifics, known to anyone, who is familiar with the basics of medical images interpretation principles.


However, a significant number of the followed bladder ultrasounds (which I passed on commercial-payable conditions (European admirers of my creative works donated for medical exams) listed an exact number of stones and their approximate sizes, and, thereby, this single element in the report sustains under a magnifying glass of suspicion.


If so, there is another - derivative - contradiction: between the very professional and adequate work in general - and this particular element in computer tomography's interpretation.


As was already mentioned, the information about the left kidney cyst was not entered into the "Conclusion" section, but, besides, it is claimed (in the summary of tomography) that - for comparison - there is only one ultrasonography, while - actually - there were, at least, 3 ultrasounds' reports in my medical file for last 1,5 years. It is written in this CT-scan printout: "Comparison: Abdominal ultrasound performed January 26, 2015". Why, then, it was chosen - for comparison - 1-year-old ultrasound, but not 3 latest (one - administrated by Dr. Rohan, second - by Dr. El-Hakim, third - by Dr. Szego), 2 of which were performed in St.-Mary's Hospital?


Concerning the ultrasound from February 3, 2016, they, probably, simply "did not want" to mention it, because it was administrated by Dr. El-Hakim.


Especially suspicious is the lack of a comparison with the ultrasound from February 3, 2016. It is completely inexplicable.


My first - initial - suggestion was that, maybe, they, allegedly, used only St. Mary's Hospital's internal computer database, but, if so, why, then, not to take for comparison the most recent ultrasounds, which I passed in St. Mary's Hospital in May 2015 (on Dr. Rohan's requisition) and August 2015? Thus, this suggestion fails.


I also asked 2 radiologists doctors in St. Mary's Hospital, if they are using for comparison EXCLUSIVELY medical images obtained during diagnostic procedures ONLY in THIS hospital, and they said that NORMALLY are chosen the most recent reports from all McGill medical centers, or, at least, as a rule, from St. Mary's, MGH, and Royal Victoria hospitals.


The same was confirmed in the medical archive.


Thus, the refusal to consider for comparison the ultrasounds from May 2015 and February 2016, and, choosing, instead, the ultrasound from January 2015: is an obvious sign of hidden, non-objective, and non-medical motivation. However, this motivation is very explicable, if taken into consideration that the ultrasound from January 2015 was administrated by Dr. Morris himself: not by Dr. Rohan, and not by Dr. El-Hakim. Consequently, CT-scan interprets' goal in rejecting the comparison with 3 most recent ultrasounds was to compare Dr. Morris's arranged CT-scan with Dr. Morris's prescribed ultrasound. This is enough for having some doubts about this report's sincerity.


I emphasize this not for accusing CT-scan report's authors of something "illegal" or "bad", but to explain that - for me, a patient with a lot of negative experience - this very good and professional report, still, could generate some justifiable suspicions.


And, at last, in the conclusion of this CT report it is written: "Please, correlate with cystoscopy".


That statement hints about Dr. Morris's influence not only on the emergence of this phrase, but on the report as a whole, and, if so, his goal was to break my resistance to cystoscopy, forcing me to undergo this procedure, and - at the same time - to pretend as though not he drew me on it. Concerning the suspicion of cystitis, Dr. Morris as if "did not see" it at all: did not refer me for analyses, did not prescribe antibiotics, did not turn down or ruled out cystoscopy.


March 18, 2016.

On March 18, 2016, I was called to the office of Dr. Morris for an urgent visit.


And, again, Dr. Morris let me in before other patients, who came long before me and who were on the list of planned in advance and booked for this date and time visits.


Dr. Morris asked me whether I am taking Alfuzosin: as though he did not know the answer.


Actually - in 2012-2015 - I repeatedly insisted on alpha blockers, but, in 2012-2014, he was denying me alpha-blockers in general, and, since spring 2015, when he, finally, agreed to prescribe alpha-blockers, he was refusing to administrate Flomax, ignoring my words about side effects of Alfuzosin, which, as I warned him, I will not be able to use. (Perhaps, the price of Flomax and its quality is higher, so, this motivated his refusal to prescribe Flomax. If he could reproach me repeatedly that I am, supposedly, "doing "too many" "unnecessary" analyses" and that each of lab tests is worth to public medical system "500 dollars", he could - for this reason - insisted on Alfuzosin).


At last, March 3, 2016, he prescribed Flomax.


Now (March, 18, 2016) he insisted that I must mandatory take Flomax EVERY DAY. I did not know by then that many urologists stop alpha-blockers for their patients for few days before cystoscopy, to avoid possible side effects of Flomax and Alfuzosin, such as an infection of urinary tract. So, I continued to take Flomax, which I would continue to take anyway, even without Dr. Morris's order. However, in Dr. Morris's intonation, when he was saying this, I detected something scaring, sinister: some kind of a hidden objective, and, in the same time, satisfaction. While - for me - the devastative role of Flomax in post-cystoscopy's complications was not known yet, it was, for sure, known to Dr. Morris: he clearly realized it.


There were several very important contraindications for cystoscopy in my case. I name only the most principal of them:

1) An acute urinal tract infection (cystitis, mentioned in the CT-scan report; enterococci, suspected by the analogy (by symptoms, etc.) with the previous outbreaks; etc.)

2) Flomax (which a number of urologists stop BEFORE administrating cystoscopy).

3) Bladder stones (it is, at least, recommended to reconsider cystoscopy in case of lithiasis).

4) Abscess (there were numerous indications, including the lymph nodes reaction; my complains and suggestions; Dr. Morris's own impression; etc.).


If Dr. Morris disregarded SUCH serious contraindications, then, maybe, he REALLY took into account the chances of possible complications for an opposite aim: for punishing me? While disregarding all protocols and norms, regulating contraindications apropos cystoscopy, he, at the same time, refused (in spite of my persistent demands) a preventive dose of antibiotics before a cystoscopy; why?


When I came, on March, 18, 2016, Dr. Morris and his secretary explained to me that my today's urgent visit was appointed by them in connections with the preliminary report of the computer tomography, which found bladder stones.


I had to ask myself a question: whether the computer tomography (arranged in the hospital - where Dr. Morris works, and where the data of the KEY urinalysis from March 2, 2015, was erased from the database) would showed bladder stones if I did not annul cystoscopy: appointed by Dr. Morris on March, 3, 2016, and cancelled by me next day, March 4, 2016?


Apropos this question, there is another question due to its eventual response: were the bladder stones real, in that case, or "imaginary" (a scam: like the forged "tubercular" diagnosis in 2000)?


All these facts show clearly that ANY person, being a patient with my negative experience, would have very justified reasons to question the integrity and credibility of this computer tomography (8-3-2016), as far as suspecting that the bladder stones were "invented". It is for an outside observer it would be easier to exclude such a scenario, but for a victim of such drama the situation is rather different. Unquestionably, the acceptation of a possibility of even such a scenario was not my fault, error, or psychologic inadequacy, but the guilt of Dr. Morris, other doctors, and medical institutions.


Another curious fact: before the CT-scan preliminary conclusive report (in an urgent order) arrived (on March 18, 2016), such a report was planned (predictably) for March 31, 2016, which was 1 day after the cystoscopy - appointed to March 29, 2016 (on March, 3, 2016, by Dr. Morris).


First, it means that, if I did not cancel the cystoscopy on March, 4, 2016, the CT-scan report would be available only on March, 31, 2016, and, thus, my cancellation of cystoscopy forced the plotters to haste and to issue the report earlier than was planned (BEFORE, not AFTER the date of cystoscopy), because - now - they needed the justification of cystoscopy.


Secondly, it means that it was not planned and was not supposed any significant justification of cystoscopy (if I already agreed to it).


However, after I cancelled a cystoscopy, and after my remarks on almost catastrophic consequences (about the dramatic complications) of the previous cystoscopy (in 2003), which I also stated in one of my fax messages, such a serious justification was now needed.


Dr. Morris's secretary several times shouted (screaming like a prison guard) at me, allegedly, because of the "cancellation of cystoscopy" "at the last moment"; though, actually, I cancelled it on the next day after giving my consent to this procedure.


The detection of bladder stones was quite a good justification for possible serious complications from cystoscopy even if it would find nothing else.


As I - later - learned from Internet communication with two famous urologists, and - as one of Montreal urologists (whom I faced in the emergency department) told me on the phone, and - as told me later Dr. El-Hakim: there was absolutely no need to carry out cystoscopy before the surgical operation of removing the calculus from the bladder, especially when the computer tomography was already arranged prior to it.


Calculi of such size (more than 1 cm) are formed during many months - if not years, and the fact that they were not found till March 2016: is a nonsense.


Most likely, there were only 2 possible eventualities: all my previous ultrasound tests (5 in last 3 years) were forged (concealing the findings of bladder calculi), or there were NO bladder stones at all (before the cystoscopy on March 29 (that assumes something improbable during cystoscopy), and the computer tomography (8 Mar. 2016) report was falsified.


Having an assumption of a current acute cystitis before his eyes (stated by the computer tomography) Dr. Morris, in response to my repeated worries and demands about prescription of urinalysis (including the bacterial culture probe) and a course of antibiotics [in connection with symptoms of an acute urological infection], all the same refused (repeatedly!) both referral on laboratory analysis, and prescription of antibiotics.


When the first shock from the news of bladder stones and the need of the surgical operation passed, I asked Dr. Morris (by then, on March 18, 2016) whether I have an option to insist - after all - on cystoscopy's cancellation, or it is obligatory before the surgery?


Dr. Morris answered it that the operation of bladder stones removal "is impossible" "without preliminary cystoscopy".


In reply, I said that - all the same - I do not agree to cystoscopy, but that he forces me to give my consent by blackmailing by a threat of a refusal to operate me - in case of its cancellation. And I asked him one more time: does he insists on cystoscopy pretending that, otherwise, he is not going to operate me? He responded affirmatively, and, on my question if he can refer me for another urologist for this lithiasis operation, he said that he does not know any urologist "without too many patients", who would "find a niche" for such a surgery.


So I found myself in a life-threatening trap.


Partially repeating above stated conclusions, let's concentrate on 2 versions of possible explanation of a) Dr. Morris's assessment of my situation on March 3, 2016, as urgent, b) cardinal change of his attitude towards me as to his patient [actually - illusory, because, in reality, his hostile attitude did not change], and c) extreme efficiency of his actions - so contrasting to his previous divergence concerning my urological problems.


Here is the 1-st of these 2 versions:


Presumably, Dr. Morris had to know that - at initial reading of ultrasonography data from February 3, 2016, - there were (possibly) conclusions that bladder stones are found (these conclusions were later withdrawn from the text of this ultrasonography's report, and its date, instead of February 3, 2016, was replaced for February 5, 2016).


From March, 2015, to January, 2016, I repeatedly asked Dr. Morris about an urgent rendezvous, but - in reply - received his and his secretaries' silence.


In this period of time, I also tried to leave Dr. Morris, and to pass from Dr. Morris to other urologist in Montreal: unfortunately, unsuccessfully.


After this "suspicious" ultrasound test (the date of the procedure was entangled; the report was delayed for nearly a month, etc.) on February 3, 2016, I did not address to Dr. Morris for a consultation, which would make his appointment to me a rendezvous date SOON after this suspicious ultrasound - at least, difficult explainable.


However, after my fax in the last dates of February 2016, in which I asked about an urgent consultation, Dr. Morris urgently accepts me at his office, before other patients, while BEFORE he ignored all my faxes and telephone requests for help, appoints 3 urgent emergency procedures, and even organizes my visit to his friend, gastroenterologist Dr. Kinnik (thereby - actually recognizing correctness of my assumptions).


These procedures: abdominal-pelvic computer tomography, cystoscopy and colonoscopy.


And, no special visible (external) symptoms this time at his office existed (whereas in the previous times I came to him with the hematuria and hematochezia, on which he turned zero attention, just ignored them, did not taking any measures).


Why this time he unconditionally trusted all my complaints whereas - in the past - he steadily showed the demonstrative and scornful mistrust to any of my description of symptoms?


All this can be explained, too, with the fact that the original result of ultrasonography from February 3, 2016, which was hidden from me and from Dr. El-Hakim (who administrated this ultrasonography), was known to Dr. Morris.


If to accept this assumption, then everything is placed in the logical places.


Why he had to appoint a computer tomography - if Dr. Morris would not already know from my integrated medical file in Santé Québec (or from the unites McGill Health Centers electronic database) about the ultrasound test, which was carried out on February 3, 2016, and then - about its results - as the cut down one, and the original?


Furthermore, if Dr. Morris was motivated in all his actions just by his cover up urges, and not by the best options for his patient, every one of his contradictive actions inset into the logical row.


If he appointed one more ultrasonography, which would find bladder stones, then there would be 2 results of ultrasound tests contradicting each other. And, in the case of an ultrasound scan and a CT-scan - formally - it seems, bladder stones were detected by an alternative scan with a different technology: though for this purpose they are equivalent. (In principle; especially for skinny people (my situation by then). Then, why the cystoscopy was so necessary?


He needed the cystoscopy for 2 different reasons: a) for punishing and torturing me, previsioning severe complications, and b) to support and confirm the conclusions of the computer tomography, which - as he foreknew - will contradict to the result of February 2016 ultrasonography.


For this reason, he did not wish - instead of cystoscopy - to appoint (as I asked) ultrasonography.


He had to know perfectly that the ultrasonography technology is not less sensitive than computer tomography, and detects stones in a bladder of 10-50 mm and bigger. And - at such thin people, as I was (since the end of 2013 - 2014): even better. Otherwise, taking into account his obsessive reproaches that I am, allegedly, "doing too many" "unnecessary" medical procedures, allegedly, "wasting public money", and his almost maniacal austerity principles, he would NEVER appoint such a relatively expensive procedure (especially, in comparison with the ultrasound) as CT-scan.


If he administrated medical ultrasonography (as he already knew - in a month after February 2016 ultrasonography), and it would reveal uric stones, then there would be questions of the authenticity of February 3 ultrasonography, legitimate and very dangerous to doctors, medical staff, and hospitals' administration.


Certainly, neither Dr. Morris, nor all others interested parties (all people, who were involved in this dirty affair) took any of eventual cystoscopy's complications in my situation (infection of uric stones, and all other awful consequences of a cystoscopy) into account.


Now it is a high time to return to the former line of the abstract hypothesis of the most improbably supposition. This assumption is postulated merely as one of theoretically thinkable scenarios: not because this scenario is realistic or possible in the light of normal life.


Here is the 2-nd of the announced above 2 versions (this "semi-fantastic" version, which I presented in the previous paragraph above, and, nevertheless, provide as a theoretical puzzle):


According to this version, not the ultrasound from February 3, 2016, was forged, but the computer tomography from March 8, 2016, because, according to this version, no stones existed in my bladder prior to cystoscopy.


In that case, if I did not cancel cystoscopy (almost right after its appointment on March 3, 2016), the computer tomography would not show any stones, which were necessary only to justify the purpose of cystoscopy and to force me to pass it by means of blackmailing (threatening that, in case of my refusal to agree for cystoscopy, cancel the stones removal operation).


However, if the goal of the cystoscopy was - already by March 8, 2016 - to put uric stones in the bladder (or, rather, generate them there by some ultra-fast biotechnology), in that case, the computer tomography was appointed just for the justification of cystoscopy and for forcing me to agree with it.


Concerning an eventual method, which could be used to put uric stones in the bladder, let's not to tied up with this question, because top doctors have a lot of secrets, and the governments and the international financial-political mafia, all the more so, always develop secret technologies, which they keep out of public spot for decades or for centuries.


To avoid an invasive cystoscopy, it was possible to arrange another computer tomography, but it would lead to an intensive radiation within a short period of time.


Another - not so damaging - choice: could be a combination of X-ray, MRI, ultrasound, etc., but, till March 29, 2016, all venues for me to get even one of above listed medical scans - were blocked, and even one-single referral on repeated ultrasonography became out of reach. All doctors - as one - refused to channelize me even for private radiology, for my own expense.


Why?!


One more alternative existed: to receive electronic images of the existing computer tomography, which I passed on March 8, 2016, giving them to an independent expert.


However, I even did not try, knowing that the response to such an inquiry will last for months and will fail anyways, because all my previous attempts to find justice within Quebec-Canadian medical system, or to receive answers about doubtful or "lost" tests were stopped by obstruction.


I was left, thus, without any choice.


It was impossible to achieve any non-invasive independent check, and this blockage generated uncertainty concerning the presence of calculi.


Any - even the most lucid person - would start to be perplexed apropos of the bladder stones in similar circumstances, and - equally - it was impossible to exclude that conclusions of the computer tomography are incorrect.


If really there are uric stones, they have to be removed as soon as possible, before one of them blocks the outflow of the urinal tracts. And the rumor said that Dr. Morris - is one of the best surgeons specializing in this procedure.


Formation of bladder stones, anyway, happened because of doctors, who ignored my problems and actually refused to imply any treatment.


I did everything to avoid stagnation and to prevent formation of uric stones.


For 15 years, I warned all doctors orally and in writing that the incalculable urological infections are treated carelessly and inadequately by medics, and that the outcome of such a scornful and negligent attitude will provoke formation of uric stones in the bladder, complications on kidneys, polyps and other new growths, cystosis, or even more terrible consequences.


Medics never furnished any explanation of almost constant hematuria and hematochezia (bleedings): since 2003 to this day (2016).


However, gross hematuria and other bleedings used to stop on limited periods - in the past years (this was also reflected also by the laboratory analyses). Each of such remissions occurred after a course of antibiotics. It specifies that - up to the end of 2015 - all bleedings were caused by infections, and - probably - abscess.


CHAPTER 5. March 19-31, 2016.


March 19 and 20, 2016.

Since March 1, 2016, I began to feel back pain, which radiated to the area of the lower part of the abdomen.


However, on March 19 and 20, 2016, these symptoms sharply amplified.


The back pain and in the bottom of the stomach caused a real suffering now, and I (in general) felt myself unhealthy, and also very much worried about passing the cystoscopy against the background of the acute UT infection.


On March 20, 2016, I went to the emergency department of Verdun Hospital (on my way to the hospital, I was escorted by police and security cars), where I explained that - on March 8, 2016 - the computer tomography assumed cystitis and that - now - the symptoms of cystitis and other symptoms of infection have amplified (both kidney pain; general weakness; general feeling sick; etc.).


The hospital attendant of the reception office (triage), with whom I spoke French, did not look like a great erudite, but it is remarkable that he could pronounce my Russian surname with a correct Russian pronunciation (and, besides, my surname is very similar to one of types of French surnames, which is pronounced in an absolutely different way, so, most officials, clerks, or secretaries articulate my surname as a French surname).


There were also other indications that he was warned about my visit in advance, and was instructed how to behave with me.


For the first time in my life, in a French hospital they mocked over me, sneered mimicking my manner to speak, and "garbled" my words and reactions (one the registration nurses and this male triage nurse).


The same male triage nurse gave me a jar and a test tube to collect a sample.


However, I noticed that there was no sticker with my identification on the test tube (for microbiologic culture). Returning with a sample, I asked the same hospital male attendant (triage nurse) - why my name and my personal data present only on the jar, but absent on the test tube (there is no sticker): how, in that case, it is possible to identify my sample, without my personal data (without any identification) on a test tube?


He immediately abruptly tore me off, and ordered to hand him immediately the jar and the test tube, and to get away to the waiting room, or, otherwise, he said, it will call security guards.


It is obvious that "bad guys" prepared the sabotage of the microbiology culture, or, saying differently, to sabotage the detection of the UT infection, because the test tube is dedicated for this exactly purpose. And the purpose of concealing the infectious bacterium was obvious already by then.


The blood test which was done by then in this emergency department (in Verdun Hospital) on March 20, 2016, indicated the low level of creatinine (Creatinine: 66 umol/L norm: 80-120), and too many abnormal (low) hematologic indicators:


Hemoglobine B 129 g/L 134-175

Hematocrite B 0,379 0 410-0 500

Globules rouge B 4, 35 X10 ~ 12/L 4.50-5.90

VPM B 8, 8 fl 10.0-13.0


Creatinine at the level of 66 indicated almost a renal failure at the patient whose usual previous indicators kept always within the higher segment of the norm (82-84).


It means that I was "thrown out" from Verdun Hospital's emergency department, when the kidneys function demonstrated very unusual for me indication, close to a renal failure, due to which I could die.


At the same time, leukocytes were in the normal range that supports the version of either a chronic infection, or an acute infection at an early stage: Globules blancs 7,0 X10 ~ 9/L 4.4-10.8.


The general analysis - urinalysis - showed an essential bleeding: Sang + + + norm: Negatif.


Microscopic analysis demonstrated significant abnormal deviations-aberrations associated with renal failure and also with infections:

Cellules erythrocytaires > 50 \champ > 4 \champ

Cylindres hyalins > 0-2 \ champ


It is also important that the microbiology culture was absent in the laboratory test report: the test tube was not received in the laboratory, or the analysis was just not done, or its result "disappeared", gone. But the most probable scenario: is that the test tube without a sticker was simply thrown out in a wastebasket. (See above about the test tube without any sticker with my name and personal data, and about male's triage nurse, who was part of this conspiracy).


Curiously, one more name appears in later printouts of laboratory analyses' reports from March 20, 2016: Dr. Edward Hajjar. Who is it: a laboratory doctor, or someone another? Concerning his surname ("Hajjar") - it completely coincides, without the last letters, with a surname "Wajjaz" ("ajja"), so, it is possible to assume that if it is not an exclusively rare coincidence, then we deal with the concealment, cover up, and tracks' erasing.


Whether Nicim Wajjaz is actually = Edward Hadjjar, or - on the contrary. And the name of Dr. Benoit Gailloux already does not appear in later printouts anywhere in general... His sordid role was just erased?..


My initial intention was to say nothing about Dr. Morris. Naively, I still hoped that Verdun's emergency department doctors did not fumbled in the medical archive or in Internet, and did not discover yet that I am Dr. Morris's patient. However, from the very beginning I met that 2 very informed plotters: this young male nurse or intern (trainee) and his supervisor, who not only (it looked so) sabotaged the microbiology culture test, by not providing the ID sticker for the test tube, and, when I protested about it, threatened by calling security guards, but also artfully and skillfully asked numerous (carefully considered) questions stated so that to find out my attitude towards "my urologist" (Dr. Morris) and his treatment of my problems.


They (the triage male nurse; the doctor intern-trainee, Dr. Nicim Wajjaz, and Dr. Benoit Gailloux) - refused to answer my question what they think of my present health condition (state) and why I feel so badly.


They did not tell a word about suppressed kidneys function and cystitis (I spoke to them about an assumption of the computer tomography and also about such symptoms as kidneys pain with radiation in the lower part of abdomen, and other pains, and about burning, urgency, general weakness and the general unwell, etc.), either pyelonephritis, or other infection; they did not answer my question whether cystitis, pyelonephritis, general or specific UTI, etc. are present in me, according to them.


They refused all my demands: 1) course of antibiotics; 2) MRI; 3) or Ultrasonography; 4) or CT-scan; 5) repeated urine test with microbiology culture (because, I underlined, the test tube was without ID, and, thus, this test was sabotaged and will not appear in the report's printouts).


Thus, my last attempt to receive any confirmation of the diagnosis " bladder stones" before cystoscopy failed.


Neither the doctor-trainee (intern), nor the resident doctor respected my requests to become their patient, passing from my present urologist (I did not call by the name of Dr. Morris) to one of them. They abruptly disregarded my requests, answering that I "HAVE a urologist" and that I am "obliged" to continue "with him".


On my statements that "my urologist" refused to appoint antibiotics, despite cystitis, and, therefore, this is their duty to prescribe antibiotics, they answered absolutely nothing.


They responded nothing also to my message that there was no sticker with my personal data - identification - on the test tube.


They responded nothing on my request to repeat - therefore - the analysis.


Finally, I appealed to them, literally begging them to help, asking them to stop unusual and cruel treatment, because, I said... In that moment they interrupted me, not letting me to speak, and asked with a sneer, what unusual and cruel treatment do I face. I responded that a cystoscopy is appointed to me, which is contraindicated, because of the following reasons:

1) An acute urinal tract infection (cystitis, mentioned in the CT-scan report; suspected pyelonephritis; current acute UTI (probably, an enterococci infection).

2) Bladder stones (the uric stones going to be infected by cystoscopy).

4) Abscess of the uterus.

5) My general unwell and pitiful state of health.


I warned them that, if I'll pass the cystoscopy in my present state, and without antibiotics, I'll have the most dramatic complications, and, not excluded, even life-threatening consequences.


One of them told me, in a mocking manner again, that nobody is taking me to cystoscopy by force, at gunpoint. I replied that my urologist said that not going to operate me for calculi removal, if I refuse cystoscopy, and threatened to expel me from the list of his patients for cystoscopy's refusal, while all my efforts to find another urologist-surgeon have failed.


I also said that I am having a temperature; that I feel an unprecedented fatigue; that I am even sitting now with difficulties; and thinking with difficulties - like during an acute viral flu; that, from time to time, darkness obscures my eyes; that my whole body is frozen by pain and painful sensations; that I have pain in the bladder and kidneys; and that I feel burning, itching, colic, etc. - in the bladder and the abdomen.


Not only that they actually denied medical care, under the pretext that I am, purportedly, "obliged" to be treated "only by" my present urologist; these two also mocked over me, scoffed, and sneered: for them it was a fun, kind of a cheerful entertainment, some sort of theatrical performance. One of them even said, sneering, that I "belong" to "my urologist's" "care".


They not only talked to me in a mocking, humiliating, ironical tone and manner, but also imitated my words and gestures in an abusive style.


From time to time darkened obscured my eyes; and - though I was in a sitting position - I (all the same) was afraid to fall down, from time to time supporting myself by a hand. My speech was affected by my present health state, as if I started to mumble.


One of them humorously imitated my gesture (when I supported myself by hand not to fall), and another imitated at this time my manner to speak, and even repeated, distorting, words, which I pronounced.


I do not doubt that they were perfectly aware of my serious condition; they fully understood that - in such a state - I should have lain; they clearly understood that I am really very sick, and that every word costs me huge efforts; they knew that the manner, in which they talked to me (actually: interrogated) is an additional torture. And, nevertheless, it only amused them.


At one point of interrogation, 2 doctors started citing the list of symptoms, none of which corresponded to my situation, and - then - they concluded that, if all of those symptoms are negative, I don't have bladder stones, because it was a list of their symptoms.


So, on March 20, 2016 I was literally expelled from Verdun Hospital's emergency department with clear blood count abnormalities (not accidentally my analysis was watched by 3 hematologists); with typical symptoms of cystitis and UTI; with high temperature (most likely, it started raising after the triage room, but, when my forehead already began to heat, and I asked doctors Nicim Wajjaz (Edward Hadjjar?) and Benoit Gailloux to recheck the temperature, they refused); with almost an acute renal failure (considering the ABRUPTLY (DEEP) FALLING of creatinine in comparison with previous creatinine tests; kidney pain and even moderate colic), and - considering the aforesaid - with a possibility of total renal failure; without having provided any medical care; and without having carried out any diagnostic procedures, except the general laboratory tests - at the same time - with the loss of the most important test result on microbiology culture; without any follow ups and further observation by doctors in next few days; and with the refusal to appoint further medical procedures - because (as the resident doctor of Verdun Hospital's emergency department said) I, allegedly, "have" a urologist and "must" "stay under HIS observation".


In the official report of medical exams only one-single "diagnosis" appears: urological lithiasis (i.e. bladder stones: that's all!).


Actions of 2 doctors and emergency department's medical staff during my address to Verdun Hospital on March 20, 2016, resulted (besides other consequences) in terrible health drama, and, in particular, provoked an acute life-threatening disease, triggered my (post-cystoscopy's) visit to Royal Victoria Hospital's emergency room, causing the whole avalanche of those physical sufferings, which accompanied this new drama.


If the sample for microbiological culture test was not destroyed by the refusal of male triage nurse to provide ID sticker for the test tube (which was - obviously - left without identification) - and the infectious agent contagium would be defined, and I would receive right antibiotics: maybe, all subsequent dramas could be avoided.


If 2 doctors did not refuse another ultrasonography, which would, probably, confirm (but if even ruled out: it does not matter) the diagnosis "lithiasis", I would refuse cystoscopy, and there would be no its serious complications' consequences, which was possible to prevent.


If 2 doctors did not refuse antibiotics: infection of bladder stones - caused by cystoscopy, - and the acute UT infection; all incredible physical sufferings; all humiliations, which I faced in the emergency department of Royal Victoria Hospital; and all other complications - could be avoided.


These doctors - a resident, and an intern, his assistant - did not mention Dr. Morris directly, but it was absolutely clear that (during the whole conversation) by "your urologist" they meant not any abstract doctor, but ONLY Dr. Morris; it was undeniable that they perfectly knew that I am a patient of Dr. Morris.


When, in April, 2016, 2 doctors, using access to Quebec medical database system, studied the report of my visit to Verdun Hospital's emergency department on March 20, 2016, the microbiology culture was absent. However, when I later received the same reports from hospital's archive, I found the page of microbiology culture with a negative result. It is obvious that it was added at the end of April, and that it is a counterfeit page.


At the same time - there is no report from the triage (in violation of all norms and rules!), and, therefore, there is no name of the young specialist (male triage nurse? an intern-trainee?), who so openly and maliciously refused to supply a test tube for a sample for microbiology culture with a sticker with my personal ID data. Having provided a test tube without patient's ID, and having added a false report about the microbiology test, those, stood behind this scam operation, worked in the style of police or secret services.


The emergency doctor, who saw the 8-3-2016 computer tomography' conclusions about cystitis, and who, unlike me, already knew about all "flags" in laboratory analyses, and, the main thing, about creatinine's 66 indicator: worked in the style of concentration camps' doctors of World War II era.


While I was interviewed by the intern doctor, I quickly listed him all urological symptoms for the last 3 years, and asked him whether there are symptoms - among them - of bladder stones, and he answered "no".


When entered the resident doctor, this subject interested them for some reasons, and the doctor told, too, that among the symptoms (listed by me) - there are no obvious specific symptoms connected to uric stones.


This conversation took place between the intern (trainee) doctor and the resident doctor, who discussed this subject so as if I was not near.


An interesting picture turned out: detection (by the computer tomography) of bladder stones was as though disconnected from all other signs indicating this diagnosis. There was any obvious specific symptom.


Any exam confirming computer tomography's conclusions about bladder stones, among which there were 3 abdominal-pelvic ultrasound scans approximately within a year: in January 2015, in August 2015, and in February 2016, none of which show either uric sand, or stones, nor something else that could indicate uric stones or their formation in the bladder.


And, meanwhile, the uric stones (calculi) are not formed so quickly. Here, obviously, something does not meet.


What happened in Verdun hospital in March 2016: is an even more ominous phenomenon, because this was the 1-st French hospital, in which I was subjected to such open humiliations and abuse. Not occasionally this is such a French hospital, which is affiliated with local municipality, and, in the same time, partially - with McGill Medical Faculty. And, because the municipal police of Verdun watched me in 2012-2017 more busily than within the territory of other municipalities, it performed this dirty work under an influence of some party and municipal officials, not otherwise.


In any other municipality (in exception of Cote-des-Neiges and Hamsted) the interception of my movement was carried out in such a style of military and landing operations, twice - even with participation of helicopters...


The next refusal of antibiotics (on March 20, 2016) could cause significant damage to my health, especially in the light of the coming date of cystoscopy, which was executed on March 29, 2016, during an acute urological infection - because of the policy Dr. Morris and irresponsible actions of 2 doctors of Verdun Hospital's emergency department.


According to logic of common sense, any doctor had to be convinced that his patient has no active phase of urinary tract infection - before carrying out a cystoscopy. The laboratory analysis (urinalysis with the test on microbiology culture) had to be the logical procedure of preparation for it. But Dr. Morris, on the contrary, refused to administrate lab tests prior to cystoscopy, refused to prescribe antibiotics (knowing that I have an acute UTI), and refused to postpone or cancel cystoscopy - despite all my persistent demands.


The ominous sense of the events in Verdun Hospital, which belongs to a different medical structure than St. Mary's Hospital is deepened by the fact that here the most blatant sabotage of microbiology culture test was carried out in an obvious and full coordination, consent, and compliance with the repeated refusal of Dr. Morris to administrate the laboratory analysis. And again - once again - the section of microbiology (culture) likewise underwent manipulations as it happened repeatedly in the English hospitals...


As soon as I came back home from Verdun Hospital's emergency room (on March 20, 2016) - a call from the telephone number 1-416-808-2222 was distributed, but I did not manage to pick up the receiver in time. This call coincided with my emergence in my apartment second in a second - and this could not be an accidental coincidence. However, a repeated call from the same number 2 weeks later - when I just came back home (second in a second) from the emergency department of Royal Victoria Hospital (April 8, 2016, 9:00) - allowed to learn more details about this call, and also confirmed that its next coincidence (also second in a second at the moment of my emergence in my apartment) with my return from another hospital: was definitely planned by somebody. This call was, allegedly, "from Immigration", and concerned - as it was said - "the questionnaire for cancellation of the Canadian citizenship " ... for me and my wife. The same man - speaking with the Indian accent - also called me later (on June 17, 2016), - when I just came back home from the emergency department of St. Mary's Hospital, with only that difference that the phone number was different at this time: 1-613-236-1222. However, the exact similarity of 3 last figures (numbers) of the first and the second phone number allowed to assume that both calls came from the same office, from the same place. And - again - I was threatened by the deprivation of Canadian citizenship (by the compulsive cancellation of my wife's and mine Canadian citizenship), which is equal to a death threat.


First of all, these 3 anonymous calls - at the very moment of my entrance into my apartment - have confirmed an obvious connection between my unusual hardships, which I am facing within Quebec's medical care system - and persecutions by Canadian Federal Immigration, and that connection, in turn, points to my Immigration case in 1994-2001, hinting that 3 foreign states (one of them is the British Empire) could be implicated in such political persecutions.


Secondly, my (and my mother's) hardship in medical institutions started when Canadian Federal Immigration's Immigration Medical Services - and doctors affiliated with it - began to use the health care system for undermining my and my mother's health, and for torpedoing our permanent residence's and Canadian citizenship's procedural course, falsifying medical reports and records, producing forged medical diagnoses (like the counterfeited by Immigration diagnosis "tuberculosis", etc.), and bombarding me by threats, in revenge for refusal of compulsory treatment in the Infectious Disease Unit (for bogus "tuberculosis") to infect me with an "urological infection".


Thirdly, all 3 (!!!) identical fraudulent calls - on behalf of, allegedly, Canadian Immigration - took place in the precise moment of my arrival home after 3 visits to emergency departments of 3 different hospitals. Only secret services and enforcement agencies had an opportunity to coordinate a phone call with my arrival home so precisely - minute in a minute, which suggests that I was closely watched. On my way back home from all 3 emergency rooms - I was escorted and watched by police.


Fourthly, these 3 sinister phone calls have proved that doctors, other medics, and medical institutions started to work as an appendage of police and other oppressive agencies, participating in political persecutions, and that the coordination between organized crime, the government, oppressive agencies, interests of the foreign states - and health care system: is real and horrific.


Massive spam, which arrived to ALL my electronic mailboxes right after any visit to any given specialist-doctor - precisely corresponding the profile of that expert (whom I visited; so, after a visit, for example, to otolaryngologist, spam about throat-nose remedies (or concerning the advertising of private otolaryngologists) came); police escorts on my way to medical institutions and back; and 3 above described threats' phone calls at the moment of my return from emergency departments of different hospitals; and a number of other similar facts: constitute a direct evidence that the political persecutions, to which I am exposed in the Canadian medical institutions, has not only local and personalized nature, but also the ominous politicized motives connected to repressive and terrorist methods of foreign states - for the benefit of which some Canadian agencies work.


The virus attacks against my computers and mailboxes; sublimation of pages for the purpose of cutting me off network resources; deletion of files downloaded by me from Internet; and other repression attacks - were executed from the same countries, from which threats and provocations used to arrive to my mailboxes: from United States, England, Israel, South Korea, India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh.


It does not mean that the clients of this campaign are in these countries; rather, we deal with the automated global repressive totalitarian machine of control and repressions, with very diverse political and ideological, conceptual, theocratic, and economic interests behind it: from far-right to left radicals, from populists and neoliberals - to international corporations and such network giants, as Facebook, Amazon, Twitter, Microsoft, etc., and, certainly, the commercialization and politicization of literally all spheres of life - from science, art, literature and music, to medicine...


March 22, 2016.

For March 22, 2016 (at 14:10) - a visit to Dr. Morris was appointed, but his secretary cancelled it in advance - because, as she explained, "a computer tomography" (CT scan) "will not be ready yet" (i.e. by March 22). This cancellation has a significant meaning, because Dr. Morris's secretary contacted me (for cancellation) on March, 17, 2016 (Thursday). Something suspicious could be detected not only in her voice, in her tone, but in the whole situation in general. Such an influential, well-known, and well-informed doctor - as Dr. Morris - knew (on March 17) that the CT scan report will not be ready yet by March 22, but next day the doctor and his secretary suddenly received a preliminary report, and invited me to Dr. Morris's office. It is just unbelievable! This suspicion was confirmed when (receiving the CT report after March 18) I looked at the CT-scan's report date: March 14, 2016.


Thus, how could it happen that - on March 17, 2016 - Dr. Morris and his secretary were confident that the preliminary report of March 8, 2016 CT-scan will not be ready by March 22, 2016, but it turned out that the FULL and FINAL report proved to be ready on March 14, 2016!


All these facts, events, and manipulations inevitably signify that no CT-scan report existed on March 14, 2016. This is, certainly, a fake date, and the report was not prepared by then. Concluding from the above-mentioned facts, there had to be 2 different (alternative to each other) CT-scan (8 Mar. 2016) reports: one false and one true. One of them was previsioned by the "team" of Dr. Morris after March 22, 2016, and the second one surfaced on March 18, 2016, with a fake - backdated - date of March 14, 2016.


One of these 2 different CT-scan report (related to the scan on March, 8, 2016) was destroyed, and the other one survived.


The insoluble problem here is which of them was true and which - false.


If it was the true CT-scan report, which surfaced on March 18, 2016, it means that the finding of bladder stones was true; if it is the false report, which surfaced on that date: it means that no bladder stones were found, and the report just lied.


This additional disturbing and puzzling mystery is a supplementary proof that anyone on my place would have reasons to doubt everything, including the authenticity of the existing CT scan report.


But the most shocking thing happened, when Dr. Morris's secretary called me on March 22, 2016 (today; Tuesday), in the morning, and told that my today's appointment (booked for 14:10) is cancelled, because the CT-scan report "is not ready yet". My astonishment was so deep, and my reaction was so frozen that I did not managed to ask her - how it is possible that the CT-scan report, which was already available on March 18, 2016, and reported about the bladder stones, "is not ready yet".


This last outraged affair was so bizarre and continued the chain of such bizarre events that scared and depressed me even more.


March 23, 2016.

A wave of desperation, hopelessness, and fear of cystoscopy (especially, carried out by Dr. Morris), the bizarre events in Verdun Hospital's ER, and other almost surrealistic affairs forced me to seek an alternative consultation. However, an only doctor, who allowed me see him, was Dr. El-Hakim, one of the last doctors, whom I still trusted. I was sure that Dr. El-Hakim is a decent, noble, honest, and compassionate man.


I had an appointment with Dr. El-Hakim, booked for March 23, 2016.


The destiny gave me the very last chance to avoid the most inferior scenario. Maybe, if I could see Dr. El-Hakim on March 23, 2016, I would cancel the cystoscopy by Dr. Morris - whatever consequences and whatever fine it would cost, and everything would develop more smoothly for me.


Unfortunately, on March 23, 2016, I was feeling even sicker than on March 20, when I went to Verdun's hospital's ER. When at home, I stayed mostly in bed, being afraid to go just to the kitchen. I was still having temperature, bladder, kidneys, and other urological pain and painful sensations.


On tragic combination of circumstances, nobody could bring me to Point-Clair by car on that day. I hesitated to go to such a distance destination on public transport (depending on time of day and traffic, it could take an hour and a half - to 2 or 2,5 hours, in jerky buses on (sometimes) bumpy roads). Because of my condition and specific state of health, I had to run to the toilet every 15-20 minutes even if was drinking just 1,5 - 2 small glasses of liquids in 6 hours. This drove me into panic as soon as I started imagining what I would do on the bus to Point-Clair. Being in my situation and not being able to empty the bladder: this evokes a real torture.


With all the risks and hardships in my pitiful situation, a trip to Point-Clair on public transport NOW represented a heroic task with an unpredictable outcome, because, without emptying the bladder in time in spite of the urgency I could damage kidneys, bladder, and other organs. Without knowing - what actually Dr. El-Hakim could do for me - it was all the more unpredictable. Going to Point-Clair right now - it was like playing the Russian roulette.


To understand my state of mind at this moment, and to imagine the amount of psychologic pressure, one can only visualize this whole avalanche of disbelief, desperation, hopelessness, and fatalism. I am not a great speaker; and my ability to explain something briefly and laconically on the phone is restricted in general, and, still, I was ready to try, but, at this moment, I recall that - when I was calling about the possibility to see Dr. El-Hakim - his secretary said that he must see me in person. However, I still had a temptation to try again to speak to him on the phone, but, in the upshot, rejected this idea.


Besides, my fear of being escorted, intimidated, intercepted, interrogated, and detained by police (in my condition!) far away from home (see above - about systematic police intimidation in Point-Clair) amplified again, and I cancelled this rendezvous.


It is possible that - if I did not cancel this visit to non-Montreal urologist (Dr. El-Hakim), if not all, then, at least, a lot of things could develop differently, without the tragic, serious consequences, which I had to endure, and which complicated for me the rest of my life even more...


March 29-31, 2016.

In such unlucky circumstances, the second cystoscopy procedure (first was enforced on me as well; in 2003) was imposed on me on Tuesday, March 29, 2016, by Dr. Morris. This horrific procedure was carried out by Dr. Morris at St.-Mary's Hospital, where he works. To this torture-execution, and back home - I was accompanied by my wife.


It is necessary to point here that, actually, I did not give my consent to cystoscopy, and this constitutes an EXTREMELY important factor.


Prior to March 18, 2016 (on March 18 I was called into Dr. Morris's office - concerning the detection of bladder stones by the CT-scan), I already CANCELLED the cystoscopy appointed to March 3, 2016. However, on March 3, 2016, Dr. Morris said that he will schedule cystoscopy for another date, and insisted that I "must" pass it "anyways". My reaction was negative: I said that I don't agree to cystoscopy, and will not sign my consent to it. Moreover, I sent him 2 faxes (before March 18, 2016), clearly affirming my decision not to pass cystoscopy.


But, having come to the office of Dr. Morris (on March 18) and having learned about the new misfortune (uric stones), I first agreed to cancel the cancellation (of cystoscopy); but, when the first shock from the news about calculi - and non-avoidable surgical operation - passed, I asked Dr. Morris (then, on March 18, 2016) whether I can still insist on cancellation of cystoscopy?


Dr. Morris replied that the operation "without a preliminary cystoscopy" "is impossible".


In reply, I said that - all the same- I do not agree to cystoscopy, but he forces me to comply threatening by the refusal to operate me - in case of cancellation. Dr. Morris was silent; he told nothing to my conclusion.


From the very beginning, Dr. Morris knew (for sure!) about nearly catastrophic consequences-complications of future cystoscopy at the present clinical situation of acute urological infection, which touched many bodies. Dr. Morris knew (for sure!) that it is better to stop Flomax temporarily before cystoscopy. Dr. Morris knew (no doubts!) that cystitis, pyelonephritis, entherococci, and abscess are contraindicated to cystoscopy. Dr. Morris knew that the cystoscopy is going to infect the bladder stones, and - then - a stones removal surgery becomes URGENT, and the patient cannot wait for his queue on the waiting list.


He deliberately refused the preventive antibacterial therapy prior to cystoscopy, thereby intentionally strengthening destructive complications after this procedure.


But even all above mentioned does not exhaust his conscious preparation of the damage to my health - because in the 2 faxes to Dr. Morris I notified him on deterioration of my state; I informed him about the progressing infection; and about the risk of the most serious consequences, which will be amplified - in connection with the new circumstances, if the cystoscopy is given the green light right now; and I claimed again that the cystoscopy must be - at least - postponed (or, better, cancelled).


In my fax from March 17, 2016, I warned Dr. Morris about the danger of cystoscopy and its consequences, and listed my fears.


I also asked to cancel the procedure of cystoscopy and, instead, to appoint one more, additional, ultrasound scan, or a computer tomography.


However, Dr. Morris ignored my requests for cystoscopy's cancellation, did not call me to his secretary for official cancellation, and did not allow me to cancel it by phone. In other words, my firm verbal disagreement with cystoscopy and my verbal declaration that I CANCELLED the cystoscopy for the 2-nd time was received, but Dr. Morris continued to disregard it.


On March 22, 2016 (in a week prior to cystoscopy), - I SENT to Dr. Morris a NEW FAX, in which I described an even more serious aggravation in general, informing him about an acute urological infection, with suspicion of acute cystitis and prostatitis, and sent him a copy of the laboratory tests from the emergency department of Verdun Hospital, which result indirectly assumed the cancellation or postponement of cystoscopy.


I also warned Dr. Morris about all inevitable complications of cystoscopy if to do it in the next few days (on March 29, 2016 - as planned).


Thus, in my calls and faxes to the office of Dr. Morris, and in my conversations with him, I was rights in my estimation of nearly catastrophic consequences of cystoscopy - on which Dr. Morris insisted, having forced me not to cancel it by his threat to refuse the surgical operation on calculi removal from the bladder.


In my fax of March 22, 2016, I also asked whether it is possible to postpone the operation itself for one or one and half months, but this statement was made by me not because I was really planning to postpone the operation, but in response to Dr. Morris's threat in case of cancellation of cystoscopy to cancel also the operation. Of course, this scheme was naive and childish by the nature, but it is worth to remember that I was under pressure of a serious stress, and that the way I was treated in medical institutions - has transferred my existence to the plane of extreme.


Nonetheless, not only the fact that I was absolutely right concerning the terrible consequences of cystoscopy if it will not be cancelled now, but also my suggestions that if I do not receive a course of antibiotics - it will trigger a health drama: were absolutely correct.


More important is that Dr. Morris himself also knew about the inevitability of cystoscopy's terrible complications (consequences) for his patient (for me), and - in addition - learned from my faxes that the cystoscopy cannot be carried out at the present time because of the aggravation of symptoms and signs that constitute serious contraindications (for this procedure). And, all the same, he did not cancel it, and went ahead with cystoscopy. Why? Because of his egoistical obstinacy? Because of his fear of the unpleasant minutes of this procedure's cancellation, which he scheduled in advance for March 29, 2016, and the shame before his colleagues and administration - because he never used to cancel such procedures? Or because he did not have any direct implication into the disappearance and falsification of my analyses and exams, and did not trigger inhuman treatment, which I am facing in city's medical institutions, such as emergency departments of Montreal hospitals, - and, therefore, he began to doubt which - after all - scan is true: the computer tomography or ultrasonography, and, therefore saw an only way to check it out by cystoscopy, i.e. by seeing and to be convinced by what he can see with his own eyes? But, in that case, what prevented him from prescribing antibiotics, and, thereby, to prevent (or - at least - to reduce) the awful consequences of cystoscopy? And whether it means that the cystoscopy - after all - was a punitive action?


But, if this is true, then the doctor capable of it - is capable of everything, and - potentially - could do even more awful things during the procedure of cystoscopy...


When I entered the room of this procedure (the operating room), I asked to replace the sack with the liquid of a product of distillation by new one. Surprisingly, but they agreed with it rather easily. I told that I will pay for a new bag (or a package), but the young male assistant (a Polish origin) with a small beard immediately connected the tube to an old bag and only then to the new one. Then he, seeing my bewilderment, said that the old bag "will be used for another patient". I said nothing, but signaled by my eyes and by gestures that there are no other patients in the room, showing that I would like to see the old bag completely removed. Dr. Morris's assistant just produced a friendly smile, as if he was perplexed - why I am concerned about such trifles whereas he is such an honest man.


However, during the procedure, he connected "my" tube not to the new package-sac of distilled liquid, but to the old sac. Was it really an unintentional mistake? Instead of handing over the tube to his colleague, Dr. Morris heaved "my" end along the cover surface to his assistant with an unexpectedly vulgar and aggressive manner, which was not combined with anything that it did and told, and threw up: "Here we go!"


In view of the fact that he told no more words (neither before nor after this first phrase), this exclamation and his "non-medical" brisk movements seem to signify something extraordinarily specific.


All his movements, all his actions, and his manners - the way of theirs gesticulate-intrinsic combination: reminded some solemn ritual, not a medical procedure.


I asked Dr. Morris whether he saw bladder stones, and he answered that there were 4 calculi, and that the size of each is about 1 cm. However, the doctor declared this by such an unconvincing and uncertain tone, accompanying his statement with the gestures of his fingers showing how big the stones are: that it left a known share of uncertainty.


What was the case? Did he concealed the truth, or something really weird, which occurred during the procedure, still was disturbing his inward sight?


Maybe, Dr. Morris defined the size of each uric stone as "1 cm" - because this is the borderline of ultrasound's standard general sensitivity?


The computer tomography found "multiple stones" (the exact number was not specified), the biggest of which made 1.40 cm. Now there were 4 stones of "about 1 cm". Did these results not contradict each other? Should the computer tomography be more sensitive and exact - concerning the number and the size of "other stones"? In addition, the ultrasound scan only 1 month earlier did not find any bladder stones.


There were, certainly, some bizarre singularities during the procedure itself.


Despite my odd (for a patient) demand to replace a package sack of the distilled liquid, they did exactly what I demanded, but later, during the procedure, cowardly connected my tube not to the new, but to the old package.


Despite my odd (for a patient) demand to replace a package sack of the distilled liquid, the young Polish-speaking assistant smiled to me in a friendly manner all the time. However, when I told him "good-bye", leaving, he suddenly grew dark as though he just understood that he saw or he made something ominous. Whether really his look reflected a shock from the fact that Dr. Morris declared that saw uric stones in the bladder? Whether he was mind-blowing from the fact that there were no stones?


And - again - the whole procedure was - almost at once - stopped after the connection of the tube, leaving no time for diagnostics (from my point of view).


There is one more suspicious circumstance.


I was called to the surgery block together an aged woman in a wheelchair, who's cystoscopy was planned at 9:30. She changed the clothes and was ready quicker than me. Despite this, and despite my sluggishness, and in spite of the fact that my cystoscopy was planned at 9:45, the nurse-volunteer (the same that escorted us and brought us there) showed up whole 3 times that to hasten me, and emphasized that Dr. Morris and his employees surely and unconditionally want to see me on the procedure (of cystoscopy) BEFORE this elderly lady.


Why?


Now: about the curious COINCIDENCES of dates (2016). March 8: the date of the computer tomography: International Women's Day and holiday of some satanic sects; March 29 - the end of Catholic Easter, and the day when Jean Lapierre was killed.


See the requisition-referral for cystoscopy below, with the date: March, 29, 2016.


As I expected, the document of cystoscopy's report was blocked for me for some time, and Dr. Morris did not want to share with me the written (documental) information on cystoscopy.


When, finally, I managed to obtain the cystoscopy's medical document, I saw the fraudulent information - entered by Dr. Morris.


He lied about noctirua (5-8 times; not 2x !), about "good stream" (!!!), about just "hematuria" (instead of chronic gross hematuria!), and about the uterus size. He also lied about patient's condition.


See the cystoscopy's report below.


Cystoscopy's (March 29, 2016) report (see above).


Summarizing all deductions about the falsifications and irregularities in the cystoscopy report, we can come to the following:

* The date of the cystoscopy procedure is not specified. Only the year (2016) was indicated, but the month and day are missing. (see the document).

* Only hematuria is mentioned, and other most important symptoms are absent.

* The names of the assistants are not specified. There were 2 doctors-assistants: one was a male urologist with a Polish family name (a male with a beard), and the second one was an anesthesiologist (a shorter male). The presence of an anesthesiologist is raising questions, too.

* Anaesthetic agent is not specified (a very serious violation!).

* The phrase "He was booked for cystoscopy": is raising questions.

* A phrase "ultrasound showed bladder calculi" - is a blatant lie. Not an ultrasound, but a computer tomography (allegedly) found bladder stones. It seems that this false reference to "ultrasound" (instead of CT-scan) was deliberately entered to justify the unnecessary procedure of cystoscopy: invasive, aggressive, and contraindicated at that time.

* The phrase "abdomen negative" is lacking the commentaries, or has no sense.

* The uterus size is deceptively underestimated. (Compare with the imaged of ultrasounds and other tests).

* "Nocturia x 2 with a good stream" purposely misleads. Everything was on the contrary. Just before cystoscopy, in my faxes to Dr. Morris, I complained of nocturia x 9-11, and also complained about the problem of bladder emptying.

* Condition of patient: "good" - is also a lie.

* When I arrived to the procedure, I asked to replace a package of the distilled liquid by a new one. It is surprising that they agreed to do it rather easily. The young assistant with a small beard immediately attached a tube to an old package, and then to the new one. However, during the procedure, he connected "my" end of the tube not to a new package, but to the old package. Why?

* The phrase "There are 4 calculi in the bladder" is entered into a wrong column line "Bladder mucosa", instead of the column "Stones". The formulary's line "Stones" is empty, which is a very sinister, frightening, hinting surreal symbol. No place of the uric stones in the bladder is indicated; their approximate sizes and structure are not specified.


The motives behind disinformation in Dr. Morris's cystoscopy's report are obvious: he falsified information about symptoms and other medical data for concealing his medical crimes. If he did not falsify this information, he could be incriminated (theoretically) deliberate sabotage of medical help. If he recognized a significant nocturia, interruption, dysuria, frequency, urgency, and other important symptoms in his patient; if he did not lie about the uterus size, etc.: then he had to explain why he did not administrate the surgical operation years ago and did not prevent the uric stones' formation; why he did not prescribe alpha-blockers years ago; why he never administrated the uroflow test (if he did not trust my description of the symptoms, he could verify them through this simple inexpensive test!); and so on.


Every lie in Dr. Morris's cystoscopy's report contradicts my verbal description of symptoms, and refuted by the content of my faxes to Dr. Morris's office.


In one of my faxes sent to Dr. Morris just few days before cystoscopy, I wrote already about 9-11 x nocturia. As for the "good stream": Dr. Morris is, certainly, merely invented it. In my faxes, I asked Dr. Morris to prescribe Flomax, motivating my demand by interruption and by other symptoms of the bladder emptying problems. And - also - by the very fact that he, finally, prescribed Flomax (relatively recently), Dr. Morris indirectly disproved his "good stream" lie.


Not only in my orally complains to Dr. Morris, but also in writings addressed to him, I reported symptoms (2013-2016), which don't correspond his deceptive statement in his cystoscopy's report. In particular, starting from the fall of 2014, I complained to Dr. Morris that it is necessary to spend up to 10 min. in "bathroom" due to bladder emptying problems.


Repeatedly, I asked him to direct me to uroflow test, but he systematically refused it.


The statement of Dr. Morris about "good stream" also conflicts with the conclusion of ultrasonography from June 15, 2016, where it is written in black and white that the liquid volume: 133 against post-depletion 106, and - it means - that it CARDINALLY refute the report of Dr. Morris.


His statement about 4 uric stones (in the bladder) conflicts to the subsequent ultrasonography, and also to the summary of the surgical operation (June 30, 2016). It is strange that nothing is told about the sizes of these stones. Any protocol demands to specify the sizes of the stones. This is a direct indication that Dr. Morris hides something, because - with cystoscopy - it is simple to estimate the sizes of uric stones.


It was also strange that the computer tomography (March 8, 2016) reports about a "set" of bladder stones, but does not specify their exact number though it calls the size of the largest of them (about 1.5 cm), which enters into the direct conflict with Dr. Morris's claim about "4 stones 1 cm each. Then, it is also absolutely unclear - how 2 last previous computer tomography and 2 ultrasounds tests could not "notice" the stones.


In Dr. Morris's cystoscopy's report, the conclusion about the bladder stones is entered in the column "bladder mucosa", instead of the column "stones", which makes does his report even more strange and suspicious.


The figure 30gr raises great concerns, too. Dr. Morris consciously "underestimated" this figure "to come off clear". Thus, all these cystoscopy's fabrications "smells badly", and any suspicions about it - are absolutely justified.


The ominous cystoscopy's affair was directly connected to the following sequence of events, which constituted a single whole with the same "medical saga" and continuation of the punitive "health care" affair.


When my wife (accompanying me) and I - we came back home after cystoscopy (approximately at 11:30 a.m.), first, at once (second in a second with our entering) a call from India rang: allegedly, on behalf of Canadian Immigration. This was the 2-nd of a series of 4 anonymous phone calls distributed at the very moment of my return home from medical procedures or from emergency rooms, and connected to threats to revoke my (and my wife's) Canadian citizenship, and, allegedly, from Immigration Canada.


The 1-st of these 4 terrorist phone calls [telephone number 1-416-808-2222] rang at the very moment when I came back home from Verdun Hospital's emergency room (March 20, 2016).

The 2-nd of these 4 terrorist phone calls [telephone number somewhere in India] rang as soon as I (with my wife) came home after cystoscopy in St.-Mary's Hospital.

The 3-rd (2 weeks after the 1-st call) of these terrorist phone calls [telephone number 1-416-808-2222] rang when I just came back home (second in a second) from the emergency department of Royal Victoria Hospital (April 7, 2016, 9:00). This call was also, allegedly, "from Immigration", and concerned - as it was said - "the questionnaire for cancellation of the Canadian citizenship " ... for me and my wife.

The 4-th of these terrorist phone calls [telephone number 1-416-808-2222] sounded next morning (9:00, April 8, 2016).

The 5-th of these terrorist phone calls [telephone number: 1-613-236-1222] rang when I just came back home (second in a second) from the emergency department of St. Mary's Hospital (June 17, 2016), and the same man - speaking with the Indian accent (who also called earlier from the phone number 1-416-808-2222, and from a phone number in India), threatened by the deprivation of Canadian citizenship again, this time also in the name of Canadian Immigration.


This similarity indicates that 1) all 4 provocation were planned and executed by the same group of people (a terrorist organization, or a special services local agency, or a foreign secret services team); 2) all 4 provocation had something to do with my conflict with the sinister Canadian Ministry of Immigration (which is equal to secret police and intelligence body by its powers and functions) in 1994-2001, and Immigration's crime committed against members of my family, and me; 3) all 4 provocations were linked to the creepy political persecutions in medical institutions (which I am facing), to the partial transformation of health care in Canada (after Jean Chretien) into a horrific machine of politization-ideologization of all spheres of life, social segregation, and hellish medical experiments; 4) all 4 provocations manifest acts of politically-motivated oppression and police surveillance: because, otherwise, these calls distributors would not be able to know the exact time (second in a second!) of my entrance into my apartment when returning from hospitals home; 5) all these 4 anonymous calls - distributed at the very moment of my entrance into my apartment - have confirmed an obvious connection between my unusual hardships, which I am facing within Quebec's medical care system - and persecutions by Canadian Federal Immigration - and police intimidation, which the authorities use as an oppressive tool to suppress self-expression, ideas, opinions, and visions that do not coincide with the ideological "party line" of the modern totalitarian regimes.


When I came home after cystoscopy, any of my 4 computers refused to start. What occurred during our absence: is a mystery covered with gloom.


In the evening, all computers worked normally. Before going to bed, I turned off all of them, and disconnected them from the electrical current.


The fact that all 4 computers SUDDENLY and at the same time "broke", and, moreover, that it happened when no one was at home, and, moreover, when I left (accompanied by my wife) to (IN ADVANCE PLANNED) a medical procedure, which takes NOT LESS than certain time: cannot be accidental.


The link between Dr. Morris's "terrorist" cystoscopy - the terrorist anonymous phone call (in the name of Canadian Federal Immigration) - and all my 4 computers' sudden dysfunction: is obvious by definition.


In my very serious condition, after the aggressive invasive medical procedure (after which pain and bleeding did not stop), I was forced to open my computers to glance inside, trying to repair them.


One of the 4 of them had a small problem: for some reason, the power supply burned down, and I replaced it by a new one, being stored by me "for emergency cases"; the 2-nd - after several attempts and manipulations - started to boot, but one of its USB ports was damaged; the 4-th computer, not the most important, could not be repaired: was not subject to recovery at all.


But the saddest fact is that my main and most important computer was more thoroughly damaged: its video card (built in the motherboard) worked with failures. I managed to restore it in 2 next days and to rescue my files. And in time: this computer ceased to work later in general.


Here it is necessary to pay attention here to what. A diversion against ALL my computers (during mine (and my family members') absent at home) happened the first - and the last - time; especially: during a medical procedure (planned in advance).


As soon as I noticed that the network computer (practically, without personal files) is not booting, I felt something wrong at once, and did not begin to turn on other computers, but got out the hard drives, put (instead of them) "temporarily" ("on duty") small volume hard drives for the period of repair operations, and - only when having repaired computers, - inserted their principle hard drives back.


I suspect that they counted on immediate booting of all 4 computers, which would make all hard drives to burn down, and all information on them - to get lost.


It is not excluded that someone, knowing my very good short-term memory, wanted to prevent me from writing down (digitally) the report about the weird events, which happened during the procedure of cystoscopy.


This incident keeps within in a row of facts, which logical chain reaches from administrative and police repressions - to repressions of the "medical line", to which I am exposed already in the 3-rd country for my vision of the world...


Here (below) is my fax to Dr. Morris on March 17, 2016, with my statement about a probable infection and potential destructive complications of the future (scheduled to March 29) cystoscopy, and with my demand to appoint an alternative (to cystoscopy) test:


Fax to Dr. Morris on March 17, 2016. (See above)


On March 22, 2016, I sent another fax to Dr. Morris, urging him to cancel the cystoscopy, and attaching the tests' from ER result as an evident of contraindications. I accused Dr. Morris in refusing antibiotics and essential medical analyses, and in not administrating necessary test before cystoscopy - for assessing its potentially dangerous outcomes. I also reported my visit to ER - as an evidence of the need of different management of my treatment.


(See below)


My fax to Dr. Morris (March 22, 2016) (see above).

See below: the requisites of this fax (March, 22, 2016):


Besides, in my phone call, I told Dr. Morris and to his secretary (March 17-24, 2016) that I have an acute infection right before the cystoscopy, and that the cystoscopy will inevitably infect the bladder stones. And, again, Dr. Morris just ignored my appeal.

In my repeated phone calls to Dr. Morris's office right after the cystoscopy (March 30-31 - April 3-6, 2016), I insisted that the cystoscopy - on top of an acute UTI, probably (in addition) infected the bladder stones, and - again - demanded the appointment on the urine test (with microbiology culture) and antibiotics, but Dr. Morris refused any help again.


Meanwhile, inexplicably extended bleeding with blood clots (besides, too big and uncharacteristic for post-cystoscopy and only typical for post-surgery) and mysterious threads were discharging non-stop since March 29, 2016, during next 2 weeks.


Blood clots after a cystoscopy on March 30, 2016.


April 3, 2016: Bloody discharges after a cystoscopy. [Form, structure and density can suggest foreign bodies in the bladder.]


Besides, there were strange "threads" ("stitching seams"?) after cystoscopy, which did not fit into any lucid explanation. These objects of unmistakably foreign nature could not belong to human tissue in any way. Some of them resembled cotton threads; others were like microscopic plastic buttons or transistors. Others were like oval cotton bulk with threads "out branched" from it (see below one of the image of samples).


Objects, similar to threads, discharged from the bladder on April 4, 2016. (Above)


On Wednesday, March 30, 2016, I made one of the few phone calls to the secretary of Dr. Morris, and she, having listened to my disturbing complaints and requests for the help, told that appoints an after-hour rendezvous with Dr. Morris for tomorrow, March 31, at 15:40. However, this rendezvous with Dr. Morris (appointed to March 31, 2016) was cancelled at the initiative of Dr. Morris, who defiantly turned me away: his patient in the most urgent health drama situation.


After cystoscopy (March 29, 2016), starting from the same day, and, till the end of this month (March 29 - 31, 2016) - massive bleeding has opened - both hematuria, and hematochezia.


At first, the stream, and discharges have shown pure blood; then bloody lumps with enormous blood clots appeared.


On April 1, 2016, it appeared, there came some seeming recovery and improvement.


However, the severe pain slashed at night, both paths captured intolerable burning and itching. On April 2-3, 2016, pain, sick sensations, weakness, and other symptoms reminded not post-cystoscopy, but the post-surgical post-operational complications, similar to those, which I experienced after each of the future urological operations in 2016 and in 2017.


I tried to phone to Dr. Morris again, but he refused to speak with me, dumping my calls. I also sent a fax to Dr. Morris, urging him to provide an emergency medical assistance. However, it was no response to my fax, either.


Persistently trying to phone to Dr. Morris, I (because of this) did not go to any emergency department or to a walk-in clinic, not without a reason. I prevision a cruel and unusual treatment in any of Montreal's ER-s, being motivated (in my 1-week refusal to address to ER) by fear of abuse and mockery, and by my disbelief in an opportunity to have a true analysis of bacterial culture and prescription of antibiotics in any medical institution in Montreal.


And (it is necessary to recognize), that, in my pitiful condition, perhaps, it made sense to stay at home: instead of subjecting myself to a bigger torture and humiliations in hospitals, without obtaining any laboratory result, and without any treatment, which my state of health demanded.


From the purely logical reasoning follows, that Dr. Morris had 3 options to react to my appeals for help and to my reproaches and demands. He could 1) urgently accept me at his office, recognizing the urgency, need and justification of my demands, to administrate both laboratory analyses (including the microbiology culture for identification of the bacteriological infection) and antibiotics; 2) to arrange my urgent appointment with another urologist; or 3) to continue his stubborn ignoring of my cry for help and to adhere to former tactics of justification of all his cruel actions, and, in that case, to address - again - to VIP persons with huge influence on the whole health care system in Montreal, and with their authority over the strict control of everything that happens in the medical institutions of the city.


It became clear soon that Dr. Morris made the second choice; and the following bizarre events in Royal Victoria Hospital, were, obviously, consequences of his indirect intervention.


_________________


Lev Gunin


THE PUNITIVE HEALTH CARE

[HEALTH CARE AS A REPRESSIVE TOOL]


BOOK 5-11


THE UROLOGICAL DRAMA. PART 11.


CONTENT

CHAPTER 1. April 1-8, 2016.

CHAPTER 2. April 8-29, 2016.

CHAPTER 3. May 2016.

CHAPTER 4. Pre-operational tests - March-May 2016.

CHAPTER 5. Since 15 May 2016.

CHAPTER 6. Since 26 May 2016.

CHAPTER 7. June 2016.

CHAPTER 8. 20 June 2016.

CHAPTER 9. July 2016.

CHAPTER 10. August 2016.

CHAPTER 11. September-November 2016.

CHAPTER 12. December 2016.

_________


* * *

The whole text of the chronological events and medical documents (under the name of "The Punitive Health Care - (Health Care as a Repressive Tool)" is available for examination only on the basis of the following contract between the author and the reader:


I (THE READER) GIVE MY CONSENT THAT, BY CLICKING CORRESPONDING LINKS AND ACCESSING THE TEXT OF "THE PUNITIVE HEALTH CARE", I AUTOMATICALLY AGREE TO THE FOLLOWING PRELIMINARY CONDITIONS [FOR READING]:


-- I am (at least) 18 years old.


1. I (the reader) is undertaking (commit myself) not to distribute the text of "The Punitive Health Care - (Health Care as a Repressive Tool)" - entirely, or in fragments; not to copy medical documents; and not to share the text and images without author' permission.


2. I (the reader) understand that the confidential information, which is contained in this text, cannot be used for any other [than the reading (extraneous; secondary)] purposes and needs, for any researches, essays, stories, etc.


3. I (the reader) commit myself not to sneer at open ticklish personal information (which sharing was induced by circumstances), not to savor any medical, physiological, or anatomic details, and not to use this text as a reason for mockery and persecution.


4. I (the reader) am warned by the author that, except for a number of obviously immoral (by definition) doctors' and medical staff's actions, other decisions and acts described in this "confession" are not subjected to hasty moral assessment because a) only experts can judge finally about their justification and fairness; b) explanations and vindications of other party are necessary. We also do not know to what degree the doctors were under an influence and direct power of police, Ministry of Immigration, and other enforcement agencies, political organizations, groups and persons - with their own ideological, economic, and propaganda interests, - and to what degree this influence impacted on their diagnostic conclusions and assessments of patient's state of health. Many of the documentary confirmed facts incontestably demonstrate that author's ideological stand (who's opposing to younger generation's transformation into zombie-biorobots with mobile phones on shoulders instead of heads; to electronic totalitarianism with its prison-like total video surveillance; and to the tyrannical political censorship) played nearly a major role in enraging the authorities and triggering the persecutions.


5. I (the reader) am warned that the author sees the main cause of the most dramatic (for him) events in the fact that the enforcement agencies and interested persons and groups managed to present him to the medical community as an individual incapable to evaluate his health condition objectively; as a health-consciousan (or hypochondriac); an extremist; a troublemaker; an individual obsessed with panic and alarm patterns; as a person, who is making unreal demands to the system of medical care - concerning his - allegedly - pseudo-maladies and exaggerated gravity of trivial indispositions. This smear campaign of defamation, scurrilous libel, and wicked calumny made impossible receiving an adequate medical care (and sometimes any medical help at all), and led to health undermining, numerous diseases, incidents, and unnecessary sufferings. Doctors also considered difficult to believe in continuous (not connected with each other) illnesses, with an interval of 4-7 days, sometimes rolling at the same time: as tsunami. They refused to believe in these sequences of illnesses' painful course, danger, and significance. This chronicle disproves such a prejudiced opinion, producing an incontestable evidence.


6. I (the reader) am informed that all negative remarks, characteristics, and facts' assessments belong only to the portrayal of criminal groups, extremists, and carriers of anti-humanistic, racist, and totalitarian ideology, but do not contain groundless generalizations and negative assessment of any country, ethnic group, or religion. The author is categorically against dismantling of any of the existing states, and against restrictions of the rights of religious congregations of any faith.


7. I (the reader) am informed that this edition partially presents the previous 2017 edition without any changes, and, thus, may not correspond to later view and opinions.


8. I (the English reader) am informed that some parts of the following English text of "The Punitive Health Care" - were translated from Polish, Russian, or French originals, and may contain primitive language, double interpretation, or puzzled meaning. Such confusing fragments should be compared with their originals in Polish and Russian languages (author's native languages) [2016-2017]; all controversial points must be resolved through such a comparison.


9. In the very last moment of this edition's make-up (April 2023), the author came across a description of so-called Havana-syndrome, and found same symptoms and complications, which he experienced when was attacked by an unknown remote weapon (3 Nov. 2005, 7 Jan. 2013, and 21 June 2016), and developed symptoms of post-microwave irradiation.


_________


CHAPTER 1. April 1-8, 2016.


April 1-6, 2016.

On Saturday morning (April 2, 2016) - there came some relief again, followed later (again the same pattern) by intensive itching and burning. And - at once after this - unbearable wild bladder pain, a real problem of bladder emptying, and bloody discharges slashed.


Without wishing to risk and wait for 12 hours in an ER, while the infection destroys the bladder, uterus, and other bodies, I began to take Cipro. (8 Tablets remained from last time, when 2 different doctors prescribed antibiotics.) [My wife found 4 more Cipro tablets later.]


By Sunday, all symptoms of an infection as though disappeared, and I could empty the bladder without pain or intensive bleeding. I also temporarily stopped taking Flomax (suggesting that - during an acute infection - it can boost it).


Meanwhile, I sent 2 new faxes to Dr. Morris, begging him for help, and describing terrible cystoscopy's complications. In one of these faxes (April, 5, 2016), I reported a serious infection after a cystoscopy and - again - desperately requested for the help.


(See the fax sent to Dr. Morris on April 5, 2016, below)


On Monday - on April 3, 2016 - new problems avalanched.


Almost each urge to empty the bladder, led to spontaneous simultaneous purgation. The lack of pressure problem has immediately worsened. Even more severe pain, irritation or proctitis followed. Something inflated inside.


After cystoscopy (on March 29, 2016), the "second function" (which was never affected or decreased after the initial (first) - "predicted" by Immigration's bureaucrats and Imm. doctors as their threat - UTI in 2001) suddenly ceased to work.


After the bloody discharges of the previous day, the pain on the right side of the bladder did not stop.


Meanwhile, something like a scar appeared on the internal surface of the upper lip, which, undoubtedly, was an infection.


On April 6, 2016, the Cipro tablets came to an end.


April 7, 2016.

On Thursday, April 7, 2016, my health state quickly worsened.


Approximately, after 11:00, I felt cold in low limbs, extreme breakdown and the general weakness, heat (temperature jumped up to 37 and 5); I noticed fever, short of breath, and ague-fit, burning of both tracts, while the itching and bleeding continued; symptoms of the uterus abscess amplified.


Then - suddenly - were added (to all this) almost total inability to empty the bladder, extremely painful miction, confusion at each action, disorientation, back pain and rectal burning and pressure.


Within next 6 hours the sharp and severe pain gradually accrued at the discharge of the bladder.


Approximately from 12:00, urine flow was already completely blocked.


Approximately at 14:50, I went to Royal Victoria Hospital's emergency room at the medical center of the "Super-Hospital" on Glen.


I described the above-mentioned symptoms to ER's male triage nurse with a precise accuracy.


However, his thoughts and intentions were occupied not by my health problems and the threat of his patient's health state to patient's life and well-being, and not by compassion to my sufferings, but by absolutely different things.


He asked me - why I arrived in Royal Victoria Hospital, but not in the St. Mary's Hospital - where "my urologist", Dr. Morris, works and performs surgical operations.


Therefore, the true meaning of this question questioned my right to address not to Dr. Morris, and the true meaning of this male nurse's words was that he incriminated me violating this imaginary ban to address not to Dr. Morris (not to a hospital where he works).


This reproach reflected someone else's furious irritation because of my unsuccessful attempts to quit Dr. Morris for another Montreal urologist, and someone's maniacal wish to punish me for that. This unwritten ban in concentration camps' style had the most depressing effect on me, and, apparently, fear for my life after the envelopment of dramas that evolved in the emergency departments of Verdun and Royal Victoria Hospitals in spring 2016, provoked first attacks of depression (a bit later).


I "justified" my choice of hospital by saying that the medical center Glen is closer to my home.


Then he began to accuse me, that, with all these symptoms, and, especially, with fever, I arrived to hospital "too late", saying that I had to come when the infection just began.


"Your health - is your own responsibility, but not ours", - he said.


This declaration was submitted in such a way and in such a tone that was perceived as a removal of any responsibility from the hospital for my safety, for my life and health, and that - if they would like to keep me in the waiting room forever (unimaginably too long), without having allowed an access to a doctor (despite the urgency of medical care and the seriousness of my state) - and (because of it) something happens to me: it will be only my "personal fault" (because I, supposedly, came "too late").


Other impression was such that he (at the same time and in the same way) distracts my attention for shuffling the conversation (the interview) to other subject, and, therefore, prevents me from describing my state of health and symptoms, and prevents me from noticing that he practically writes down nothing in the form of the official report-formulary.


Still, I adequately described the symptoms and how my condition - again - developed.


However, he immediately interrupted me, saying: "Stop, stop, there is not a lot of... There is no place for a novel". It was such a cruel, vicious exclamation that has betrayed his role of an executioner.


In general, my intuition and logic hinted that - in both Verdun and Royal Victoria hospitals - male nurses were chosen to assess my condition, because the chooser considered women nurses softer, and was worried that female nurses could be softer with me than the men. I also suspected that the 2 young male triage nurses (maybe, not triage nurses at all!) in Verdun and Royal Victoria hospitals' ER's (March and April, 2016) were chosen not randomly, or, in other words, they were chosen as particular personalities and representatives of particular family clans. For example, Mr. Pierre Gauthier could be a nephew, a son, a grandson, or other relative of Mr. Charles Gauthier, one of personalities that responded to my complaints about the conflict in Montreal General Hospital's ER. And the 2-nd young man, who posed as a triage nurse in Verdun hospital (March 20, 2016), who was made (by hospital's administration) completely anonymous, and who sabotaged my tube test by refusing to provide an ID sticker, could bear the name of Bronfman, Trudeau, Gauthier, Valois, Cox, or of other representatives of the higher Quebec-Canadian establishment. That might be a reason, why his name did not surface in any of the documents.


In general, the usage of the health care system for provocations against patients-dissidents; for discrediting patients' political or ideological views or believes; for covering up politically-motivated beatings, attacks, or staged road accidents; and for extortion of dissidents' "inadequate" reactions, statements, etc., - when they are at strong pain and in a pitiful health condition: it is a vicious and one of the most sophisticated and refine kind of torture. It is especially applied to ER rooms, and, especially, to triage rooms, because such actions of the triage nurses are equal to the actions of KGB, Gestapo, or Guantanamo slayers, when they tortured political or war prisoners.


Later, holding in my hand the official report of this male triage nurse (see the relevant documents), I saw that only such symptoms as PARTIAL retention, hematochezia + hematuria, and fever were mentioned. (He also mentioned pain in the middle part of abdomen's bottom, but I do not remember if I really reported it, and if I had such pain indeed.) However, the most dangerous and potentially life-threatening symptom - complete retention (ischuria) - was not mentioned at all!


Other symptoms, which I described to the male nurse, including acute UT infection, the sense of cold in the lower limbs, short of breath, ague-fit, extreme weakness, disorientation, burning & itching in both tracts, dysfunction of the uterus, and suspicion concerning the uterus abscess: all this was absent in the official report. (See below) However, these symptoms were the most significant, and decisive in the term of my priority in the queue to see a doctor.


The triage nurse report (see above), April 7, 2016.


This triage nurse's report contains a blatant lie on its 1-st page already: he claimed that I, allegedly, "been put on Cipro PO for 2 days", which is not true. Neither Dr. Morris, nor the doctors in Verdun Hospital's emergency department prescribed Cipro, but, on contrary, they DENIED Cipro.


Besides, a number of obligatory indicators and data are absent in this document, in violations of safety protocols... (As told one medic).


Here, the bladder scan for assessment of the stagnation and outflow is displayed, too. Apparently, judging by the data of this document and according to its conclusion, an urgent hospitalization was required by medical standards-protocols.


Here it is written literally: "Had cystoscopy done of March 28 for stones in bladder, been put on Cipro for 2 days, hardly passing urine, some hematuria and [hematochezia]... Some pain mid-low abdomen."


This male nurse cynically reserved the usage of the criminally applied misinformation. In addition to his lie about an alleged "2-days Cipro" course, he also lied about "small" retention, while I had a full retention, and reported to him about this major problem!


However, in his report, this male nurse, Pierre Gauthier, has unwillingly spilled the leak of information, by writing that the patient "Had cystoscopy done of March 28 for stones in bladder". This is a whole revelation; here it cleared up that Dr. Morris done this procedure not because "without it, it is impossible to do the operation"! When Dr. Morris has extorted my consent actually by force (threatening, otherwise, not to do the surgery), he gave no argument, except of "without the cystoscopy the lithotripsy operation is impossible". Only before the cystoscopy, already in the operation room, when I - last time - began to ask questions, still doubting the need of cystoscopy, Dr. Morris added to his initial argument - that this procedure - in addition - can play a positive role for my "own tranquility", removing "doubts" about lithiasis.


A special remark of the triage nurse - "looks unhealthy" - could, possibly, pass for compensation of a missing symptom of extreme fatigue. Of course, it could not "compensate" his lie about the alleged Cipro course, and the concealment of the most important emergency problems. And, still, in comparison with the actions and reports of other - "charged" by the authorities by a "special mission" - triage nurses, this French-speaking medic acted more conscientiously. Not just by such a comparison and by the logical deductions, but also on the emotional level - I felt that this young man is still not completely conscience-stricken free.


That is why his lie that, for example, I was, allegedly, "put on Cipro for 2 days", etc. - is seen as a special assignment, which he was obliged to carry out as a military order despite his personal conscience, and this task was given to him to frame (to shade) Dr. Morris. The same can be said about his cruel outraged statement that I am deprived of my right to address to any other doctor, except Dr. Morris, which can be perceived as not his personal statement, but a task that was given to Mr. P. Gauthier by his "political" supervisors-operatives.


In my conversation with the male triage nurse, I did not name my urologist's name (Dr. Morris's), but, nevertheless, his name appeared in the official report of the triage nurse. It inevitably prompts about Dr. Morris's personal connection-implication to everything that endured on April 7, 2016, in Royal Victoria Hospital's emergency department, and, perhaps, about his continuous personal supervision of all - evolving in ER - events, including his personal role in the order to sabotage the result of the first urine test in RVH emergency department, and to refuse the correct treatment for acute prostatitis.


The date of cystoscopy was also given incorrectly in the triage report (March 28, instead of March 29, 2016). Certainly, it was a deliberate "error", made for a particular hidden purpose. The fact of the matter is that - on March 28 - I sent 2 last faxes to Dr. Morris, asking him to cancel the cystoscopy; so, if the cystoscopy was done on March 28 - then my faxes would have no sense. Also (it is not excluded), the authorities still planned to block me an access to cystoscopy's report, and, in this case, a false date of cystoscopy could help somehow.


In the triage room, I already had temperature 38 and pulse 99. Against the background of such vital signs as fever (temperature) 38 C, complete retention for 7-10 hours already by then (which the triage nurse concealed!), etc. - the remarks that I arrived to a "wrong" hospital, and similar, were especially cruel.


The retention continued despite drinking a lot of liquids. I came to the hospital with a 2 L bottle in my bag, and kept on drinking non-stop. Maybe, because of this reason, or, maybe, because of my "superhuman" efforts, I could provide a sample (just for a minimal volume limit for a lab test), approximately, at 17:05 [till 17:00 - full retention; at 17:05 - literally drips].


My state worsened again: I was not able even to sit, and lay on the couch in a painful, uncomfortable position.


However, despite my dangerous state, I was kept in the waiting room 5 more hours - before being called to a young intern-trainee doctor - not to a resident doctor (!).


During this time, the retention was already complete again within about 3-4 hours. At some moments, my sight weakened, and, from time to time, my eyes were dimmed by a veil.


I also suddenly began to see objects unsharply and vaguely.


According to emergency department's documents, the first sample was presumably received at 17:30. In fact, it was taken away from the triage room around 17:05. Absurdly, however, but, according to documents, the result was ready at 14:36 already. It does not make any sense. At 14:36 I was still at home, still even not on my way to the emergency room, and, certainly, the result could not be ready for hours before the sample was received. (Still, nobody repealed the laws of causal nexus and cause-and-effect). It is obvious that the result of the laboratory test underwent sabotage (for the umpteenth time already!), just as a set of other analyses in previous months and years. And, indeed, the doctor recognized in his report that the first UV (urine test) was lost (missing).


Amazingly: the young doctor-intern, Dr. R. Mohindra, began to ask me about my name, my address (where I live), about the hour of my arrival to the hospital, about the symptoms (which motivated me to go to ER), about the temperature (fever) and its raising at me, etc. - all again from the scratch, as though the triage official report was not available to him, or was missing.


In contradiction of the official triage report, the remarks written by Dr. Mohindra contain information, which is absent from the triage report: such symptoms as back pain, heat and painful miction, etc.


However, as it is noted in his remarks, he or his chiefs, most likely, contacted Dr. Morris, and St.-Mary's Hospital by e-mail or by phone. Is also surprising that Dr. Mohindra mentioned acute prostatitis (confirming my self-diagnosis, stated in my faxes to Dr. Morris, who just blatantly ignored them) as a probable diagnosis, but did not bring it as the final diagnosis. (In defiance of all norms, there is no final diagnosis at all in his official report).


When he carried out the digital exam, an inhuman pain struck as a knife, and I asked about the uterus abscess. Amazingly, the doctor did not give any answer to my question, and told nothing about the resume of his assessing.


When I told him that I suspect acute UTI, acute prostatitis, acute cystitis, pyelonephritis, noting an inexplicable dangerous bleeding with blood clots, and demanded an urgent and adequate treatment, he asked me why I did not address to "my urologist", Dr. Morris.


First, I decided not to give a direct answer, and said that - as I came here - he, Dr. Mohindra, is now responsible for my well-being, not Dr. Morris.


Dr. Mohindra ignored my reply, and repeated his question again.


Then I tried to avoid the direct answer by saying that in an emergency situation - it is needed to turn to an emergency room, but Dr. Mohindra has repeated his question for the 3-rd time.


Consequently, I was forced to explain that, since the cystoscopy procedure, I called and faxed to Dr. Morris, and left messages on his answering machine almost every day; spoke with his secretary; but Dr. Morris ignored all my appeals for help. Moreover, when his secretary has appointed an urgent rendezvous for me with her chief, Dr. Morris canceled it. I also explained that, if Dr. Morris does not want to be my doctor and to provide a medical treatment, and if he felt "offence" by my appeals for help, he could arrange my transfer to another urologist, but, on the contrary, Dr. Morris uses his whole influence in the medical circles for blocking my access to any other urologist.


Oddly, in spite of my explanation, Dr. Mohindra insisted (all the same) that I have to address exclusively to Dr. Morris, and not to someone else among urologists.


This senseless dispute-inquiry, initiated by Dr. Mohindra, took a lot of our precious time, prolonging my suffering, increasing waiting hours, stretching the gap between my arrival to the hospital - and the starting of medical treatment, and taking away so needed medical help from other patients. However, I don't incriminate Dr. Mohindra inhuman treatment, because he, probably, was too scared and too perplexed to revolt against his chiefs and to disobey their orders, but I accuse monsters, who commanded Dr. Mohindra to comply.


The digital exam, perhaps, played a role in the return of the bladder emptying function; and some improvements followed.


A little later, the nurse, who entered with a special scanner to check the accumulation of liquids in the bladder, demanded to provide another sample for urinalysis. When I asked her, what happened to the first sample, she tarried, was obviously embarrassed and confused, and immediately left, without having answered my question and without demanding to provide another sample. This was an obvious signal that something weird was done to my laboratory test and that this test was sabotaged deliberately.


Later, in the Waiting Room Number 2, another nurse approached us (by then, my wife came to the hospital to stay with me), and demanded to provide another sample, justifying this order by an uncertainty concerning the results of the analysis of the first sample. According to her words, they - presumably - found a "foreign (external) bacteria", and would like to check whether these microorganisms "got there" "accidentally".


I said to her that - before trying to collect another sample, - I would like to know what microorganisms (bacteria) were found in the first sample. I also told her that I don't trust her words and suspect that something simply happened with the 1-st test. And, after outlining my suspicion, I said that I refuse to provide another sample until will know what exactly happen to my 1-st test. However, by her reaction, I understood that - if I refuse to collect another sample, - they will refuse the treatment.


But the torture of 7-hours long waiting, and the awful torments, which I suffered from, and the uncomfortable position on narrow seats of the waiting room couches, and the deathly fatigue and psychological torture in such a desperate situation (and also the fear of life-threatening danger) so weakened my will to fight that I gave up. I only noticed to this nurse: what if a strictly physiological problem will just not allow to collect another sample, what then: I will be refused exams and treatment? She was silent, answering nothing.


The second sample was received at 22:15.


I quickly understood, those "external bacteria" could call in question the safety of cystoscopy and to cause much harm to Dr. Morris. I told my wife that I am sure: they were going to destroy the results of the analysis of the first sample.


Therefore, I was not surprised at all, when - in the presence of my wife - the same young doctor-intern (trainee), Dr. Mohindra, told us that the first sample "was mixed with a sample of other patient", and that now they, allegedly, doubt to whom exactly it belongs.


When I asked about bacteria (which were present at that sample), the young doctor told that he "cannot disclose this".


I said that I do not demand "to declassify" the personal data (confidential information) of the other patient, and have no desire to learn his or her name, I only need to know the name of bacteria. Any answer.


It was offered "to complete" the course of Cipro - and any treatment of acute prostatitis.


Almost in panic, I said that I already tried Cipro for treatment of the same infection, and it did not work in general, and, besides, it did not cause long improvement, only worsening my state by a serious diarrhea.


Dr. Mohindra answered that this is an only option left for me: to take this pill "despite diarrhea" - because I will not "receive anything else".


(This statement that I will not "receive anything else" - was told by a tone of a threat, and was perceived - in the context of a situation - as a threat that I will be refused not only another treatment, but - in general - will be refused any medical care).


The handwriting of Dr. Rokhit Mokhindra, who wrote - by his own hand - that the 1-st urine analysis was "lost" in the emergency department of Royal Victoria Hospital - site Glen. (See above)


I repeated that I already tried Cipro, despite the danger of fatal diarrhea, but the infection continued to progress, and that, besides, during the last course of Cipro - projected for 3 and a half weeks - I could take this antibiotic only around one and a half weeks because the diarrhea became literary menacing, nearly fatal (from here the rest (excess) of the tablets).


Dr. Mohindra answered to this - that a 2 weeks "right" Cipro course will provide a desirable effect.


He responded to my reproaches (concerning the improper treatment) that supposedly I should not have come to this emergency room (i.e. to Royal Victoria Hospital), but was obliged to present my problems directly to "my urologist" (Dr. Morris), or to address to St. Mary's Hospital - where Dr. Morris works.


When I asked whether it means that I am banned from all other hospitals - except of St.-Mary's and JGH, - he answered that "in any other hospital they will send you back to your urologist" and to St. Mary's hospital, or "will have it in mind".


Antibiotic Cipro, received in the pharmacy on Dr. Rokhit Mokhindra's prescription. (See above)


An additional disturbing fact - is that Dr. Mohindra did not offered any extra-tablets of Cipro immediately, as they normally do in the emergency department. Having a dangerous infection, which affected both functions and caused the total fatigue, general incredible weakness, short breath, disorientation, high temperature already 39 C, fever, severe pain in both paths, and other symptoms, I expected that I will immediately receive treatment by antibiotics, without any delay.


I already had a similar experience in other hospitals, where, directly in the emergency department, they delivered a first antibiotic pill to take it right away, and second - to take it home, before I managed to get a pack in a pharmacy.


As far as I know, according to the standard protocol for such situations, a patient is usually given a tablet directly in ER before he receives the whole course of antibiotics in a drugstore.


That's what took place in last years in all French hospitals, such as St.-Luc, Hôtel-Dieu, and Notre-Dame: when I addressed with an acute urological infection there (an only French hospital that refused antibiotics, and "expelled" me home with cystitis, with almost renal failure (caused by an infection), with dangerous changes in blood composition, and with others pathologies (demanding immediate medical intervention), signs and symptoms: was the Verdun Hospital (March 20, 2016).


However, in the Royal Victoria Hospital's Glen Site (April 7, 2016), appointing the course of Cipro about midnight (when all pharmacies in Montreal are normally closed), the young Dr. Mohindra of the Adult Emergency, - did not worry at all about a delay for 10 hours (until I'll be able to buy the medication). I believe that the refusal to provide me with 2 extra pills of Cipro right in the hospital was a sort of punishment, which chefs of Dr. Mohindra charged him for execution for punishing me.


He sent me home without an extra-tablet of Cipro before I could receive a pack of antibiotics, and without any treatment of an acute dangerous infection.


Fortunately, when we came back home, my wife could find 4 more tablets in a separate container from the last course of treatment. This was an only single time, when I did not finish the whole course of antibiotics because of nearly fatal diarrhea, which never used to happen before.


It is necessary to stress that - during all previous years - I accurately took all (to a single last) tablets of each course of antibiotics, but the main problem was that the antibiotics were not prescribed in time, during an acute period of infection, but, as a rule, with a big delay, only after my weeks-long demands.


Besides, every course of antibiotics was appointed inefficiently, for 7-10 days whereas the course of - at least - 3 or 4 weeks was necessary to fight UTIs.


Besides, for an effective treatment of prostatitis Cipro 500 mg tablets were required, and a special grade was necessary.


Besides, a great number of my missing or not authentic laboratory analyses undermined a chance to receive a right antibiotic - for suppression of a concrete microorganism (bacterium), - while, mostly, since 2001, doctors used to prescribe not Cipro, but other - ineffective - antibiotics, and this further reduced the probability of a "happy outcome".


Thus, if not the sabotage of the treatment for an initial urological infection (from 2001 to 2016), then 2-4 courses of antibiotics - before they became a serious task for my digestive tract - could easily win against the infection and prevent almost all my subsequent huge health problems.


In his hand-written official report, Dr. Mohindra described all these outraged events in general rather truly.


Amazingly, but I was nearly "expelled" from Royal Victoria Hospital's Adult Emergency department (Glen Site) WITHOUT A BLOOD TEST (!) - that is the wildest (in my case) violations of medical norms and conflicts to any medical protocol.


Only closer to the end of my stay in Royal Victoria's emergency, I, providing a sample for 2-nd UV, and seeing that they are not going to administrate a blood test, became indignant, and said that I will not leave the emergency department without the blood test, and, a bit later, they conceded to my demands - and took the blood sample.


See the laboratory tests' printout below.


The laboratory analyses' from Royal Victoria Hospital's Adult Emergency department (on Glen site) printout, April 7, 2016. Page 3. (See 3 preceding images (pages) above).


Here we see a list of a huge group of serious abnormalities' indicators (in these laboratory analyses):

17:30:

Neutrophils Manual - 16.79 (twice higher than the norm!)

Lymphocyte Manual - 0.77 (norm - 0.80-4.40)

Monocyte Manual - 1.74 (twice higher than the norm!)

Echinocytes---------1+ (should not be present by the norm -!)

Elliptocytes---------1+ (should not be present by the norm!)


22:08:

Urine Blood---------Trace (should not be present by the norm)

Urine Leucocytes Esterase 70 (should not be present by the norm)

Urine pH------------7 ("occult blood": 7 times higher than the norm)

Urine Specific Gravity 1.015 (abnormal)

UA Epithelial Cells 1+ (should not be present by the norm)


17:30:

Urine Blood---------A little (should not be present by the norm)

Urine Leucocytes Esterase 125 (125 times higher than the norm!)

Urine pH ---------- 6.5 ("occult blood": 6.5 times higher than the norm)

UA RBC ---------- 6-10 (should not be present by the norm)

UA WBC --------- 20-40 (should not be present by the norm)

UA Epithelial Cells 1+ (should not be present by the norm)

Sodium ------------ 132 (by norm: 133-143)

Chloride ----------- 99 (by norm: 100-109)

Creatinine --------- 68 (by norm: 80-110)

WBC (Blood Leucocytes) -19.30 (by norm: 4.50-10.00)

RBC (Blood Erythrocytes) - 4.55 (on norm's borderline)

Hemoglobin (Blood Leucocytes) -133 (by norm: 135-175)

Hematocrit ----------- 0.400 (by norm: 0.420-0.520)

Relative Neutrophil - 86.78 (by norm: 40.00-70.00)

Relative Lymphocyte - 5.74 (more than 5 times lower than the norm!)

Abs. Neutrophil Automated -16.75 (more than 2 times higher than the norm! (7.00)

Abs. Monocyte Automated -- 1.41 (0.00-0.80; almost 2 times higher than the norm!!)

INR --------------------- 1.14 (by norm - 1.10)

Prothrombin Time ---- 15.4 (by norm: 12.7-15.1)


Hematologic low lymphocytes; neutrophils - twice higher than the norm!; monocytes - twice higher than the norm!; suppressed blood coagulation (slowed-down action of thrombocytes - PT, INR); urological occult blood - by 7 times, and leukocytes in 70 and 125 times higher than the norm; creatinine (kidneys function) - 68 (suppressed renal function, can lead to a renal failure); nearly 20 thousand leukocytes (!) - white blood cells; erythrocytes (red blood cells) - on the limit of the norm; low hemoglobin; considerably low hemocrit (the haematogenic function); relative lymphocytes - 5 times lower than the norm (!); absolute neutrophils - more than twice higher than the norm; absolute monocytes - almost twice higher than the norm; etc.


If he was serious, one doctor, looking at this list, wondered - how I could stay alive!


No wonder that the emergency staff resisted the administration of the blood test, and agreed to take the blood sample only after my protests and demands, literally after my "ultimatum". They expected that the blood test will show something completely incompatible with a decision to send such a patient home.


There is a question: how could they send me home from the emergency department with obvious symptoms of acute prostatitis, fever, high temperature, retention of both functions, with a serious set of abnormal indicators in blood - urine test, with nearly 20 thousand leukocytes (!), low hemoglobin, and with other dangerous signs and symptoms, and with the repeated laboratory analysis' result, which showed a hematuria and a dangerous acute infection?


But there is more to come.


From the printout of laboratory analyses follows, that, appears, the 1-st urine test, which, allegedly, "was missing" ["confused with other patient's test"] (so was written in the official report of Dr. Mokhindra - see above) - was not lost at all, because only one of its part was gone, namely: microbiology (bacteria culture; preliminary result).


It appears that only the bacterium, which was found, was "lost" somewhere. But this part of laboratory analyses systematically vanished since 2001, when, after threats of Immigration officials and Immigration doctor, I was "attacked" by a urological infection. This particular laboratory test - the microbiology culture - "failed" in January 2001, after a positive urinalysis lipstick ("litmus" paper) test in Dr. Jast's office, which showed an acute urological infection, but the laboratory test - done next day, - allegedly, did not find a bacterium.


The data of this particular test - microbiology culture - was "missing" in 2 strange reports-results, which were already described in other parts of this chronicle for 2003-2005. This part (microbiology culture) was "missing" from the laboratory analysis on March 3, 2015; and the same part - from the analysis in Verdun Hospital emergency department of March, 2016.


How could they - on norms of civilized eras and civilized countries - send home a patient with such dangerous vital signs, symptoms, and abnormal indicators in the laboratory analyses, with 20 thousand leucocytes, and in such pitiful, life-threatening state, instead of hospitalization (or - at least - daily observation in the hospital)?


They could do it just because received an order to cover up Dr. Morris's medical crimes, for the cost of well-being of the patient.


On emotional and intuitive level, I did not sense Dr. Mohindra as an evil person. There were no doubts that he received an order to punish me, to inflict a huge amount of torture, to camouflage the sabotage of the urine test, to intimidate me for "not addressing to Dr. Morris", to deny not only an extra Cipro pill, but to kick me out from the hospital without any treatment. I believe that Dr. Mohindra's moral values, however, did not allow him to discharge me from the hospital without antibiotics, and he, probably, disobeyed these monstrous moral freaks, who gave him such an order. As for their other commands, Dr. Mohindra could follow them purely formally, in reality having a very different motivation. Judging by the sabotage of the laboratory tests, and by the pressure, put on him by the authorities, Dr. Mohindra could conclude that any Cipro tablet offered by hospital may pose a danger to his patient, and that I may be more safe at home than in the hospital.


But - in either case (was Dr. Mohindra a callous executor of authorities' orders, or a conscientious objector to their commands (which is more likely): the full disappearance of his name from the medical database (several months later) - is an evidence of cover up and of the involvement of secret services or secret societies.


In later printouts (July 2018) from the digital archive of Santé Québec, the name of Dr. Mohindra disappeared from everywhere, starting from the laboratory tests (which he administrated), to his own handwritten doctor's report. (Which also disappeared). Dr. Mohindra's name was erased from all digital documentation - as if he never existed, and I feared for his life. When I tried to learn something about certain Dr. Mohindra, practicing in Montreal, I could not find any information: as if such a person is a ghost. At the same time, another name appeared instead of the name of Dr. Mohindra: a name of other doctor, who is called Jean-Marc Troquet. Perhaps, it was the supervisor of Dr. Mohindra by orders of whom Dr. Mohindra acted? However, I was, certainly, assessed and treated not by a Frenchmen Dr. J.-M. Troquet, but by a young doctor, whose name Mohindra is natural for how he looked.


Dr. Troquet's name is present only in the tests' report indicated by time 22:15. As regards the tests administrated upon my arrival (17:30): there is a remark "Médecin non indique" (Doctor not indicated). Such a remark is not just improbable by all standards and practices; it is literary surrealistic! The study of other improbable details follows below.


Not a less tremendous mystery is a "mysterious" infection, which forced Royal Victoria Hospital or its invisible chefs to destroy my laboratory test. What "mysterious" infection was capable to "reshuffle" to such a degree all indicators of the blood test? Or what - in reality - the cystoscopy, which consequences (complications) reminded post-surgery, post-radiation, or post-implant's consequences, was?!


Such severe and (even more important) unusual consequences of cystoscopy forced me to recall a "fantastic" hypothesis described above (in the section related to cystoscopy's events).


2 later printouts of the same lab results: see below.


1)


2)


2018 printouts of 7 April 2016 laboratory analyses results [RVH emergency] (from the digital archive of Sante Quebec):

1) there are some inacceptable manipulative tricks (the analysis of the second sample, which arrived 3 hours later, is given in the beginning, etc.);

2) the sample provided at 17:30 - came to laboratory at 20:45 (and this was in the emergency department!), which causes the highest degree of bewilderment; but actually it, perhaps, reflects some kind of another trick, which purpose was to shade the fact that there were 2 samples and 2 laboratory analyses, but not 1; another fact that they tried to shade is that - at such serious problems and life-threatening blood test indicators any second - repeated - test was not done; there immediately appeared (clearly, merely to justify hospital's actions) the diagnosis "neutrophilic leukocytosis"; actually, this was not any justification: I knew even before my actual deportation from my native Belarus that such leukocytosis is caused by a life-threatening infection or poisoning, either autoimmune intoxication, or radiation; that it is a life-threatening issue, or (and) is a life-threatening issue by complications, one of which - a complication on the haematogenic bodies; at such diagnosis hospitalization, observation of specialists doctors (including hematologist), etc. is OBLIGATORY.


Another manipulative trick (for the concealment of truth and for concealment of doctors' names: the lack of a name of the doctor who appointed the analyses.


Besides, in later 2018 printouts (from the digital archive of Sante Quebec) other ("additional") details emerged: the most serious abnormalities found by the laboratory analyses were grouped together, and among them - there is a CRITICAL indicator of neutrophils noted by letter "C":


1)


2)


2018 printouts of 7 April 2016 laboratory analyses results [RVH emergency] (from the digital archive of Sante Quebec):


1) problem with thrombocytes' function; nearly 20 thousand leukocytes and low hemoglobin!

2) CRITICAL indicator of neutrophils! "Critique" (Critical) means the higher - life-threatening - alert. It means that I was sent home from the hospital in a life-threatening situation.

3) An additional mystery: why the hematological factors' report was transmitted by telephone and what does it means? (See above)


Now, an additional remark should be added: the low indicator of specific gravity (density) - a very meaningful abnormality - was not noted in any way (in the test's report), but, on the contrary, was shaded by the absence of the norm reference.


Why I was "thrown out" from hospital in such a state?!


Why they did not repeat the blood-urine tests before sending me home?!


Why the doctor, knowing that Cipro antibiotic caused an acute diarrhea (with a possibility of fatal diarrhea) in me, refused an alternative antibiotic and (or) hospitalization, and "expelled" me home, having all the same appointed Cipro at SUCH results of blood tests?!


All these injuring events happened to me only because the infection progressed.


These and other wild events in Verdun and Royal Victoria Hospitals' emergency departments - are fully on Dr. Morris's conscience, because of any of randomly chosen facts (among dozens of others):


a) in the morning, March 31, 2016, I left to him the message on its answering machine when its office had to be opened; and, really, when I called, the automatic message on the answering machine was the same that was used during usual working hours);

b) On April 5, 2016, still without having any response from Dr. Morris, I called Dr. Morris's secretary at 15:55, and reported (to her) about quickly progressing (and extremely dangerous) infection of a post-cystoscopy, begging about help;

c) later, on the same day, I sent a fax Dr. Morris with a description of the desperate request for his consultation related to post-cystoscopy's infection;

d) etc.


Besides the dubious identification of uric stones (which were infected by this procedure), the cystoscopy did not yield any other results.


Really, this procedure - as already it appeared earlier (in 2003) - was useless as a diagnostic tool in my case, and only caused serious damage to my health without any advantages. Dr. Morris's justification of lack of a diagnosis and his refusal of any adequate treatment of my problems - by my unwillingness to pass cystoscopy: was actually a nonsense.


Such an open and shocking indifference in the form of defiant refusal to respond to his patient's appeal for urgent medical help - related to post-cystoscopy infection (which - even without patient's appeal - was his medical duty), perhaps, was motivated by his reluctance to the identification of bacteria, which caused an infection, and his fear of eventual criminal investigation of a suspicious intrusive procedure, which he formally called "cystoscopy".


The same motivation can explain also his refusal to administrate blood-urine tests, including the microbiology culture,

1) which I demanded when addressed to Dr. Morris in my fax to his office on March 2, 2016;

2) and his second refusal, when I came to see him with an acute infection and serious simultaneous hematochezia-hematuria on March 3, 2016;

3) and his following refusal, on March 18, 2016, when I asked him to administrate urgently laboratory tests for a UT infection (including the microbiology culture) 10 days BEFORE cystoscopy, for prevention of its complications;

4) and, finally, his refusal to respond to my alarming statement about an acute and severe post-cystoscopy infection, which automatically became also his refusal to administrate laboratory tests for infection.


In the same period, in Verdun Hospital's emergency department, I received a test tube (for microbiology culture) without any ID - without an ID sticker in general, - and, when I expressed my concern and bewilderment about it to the male triage nurse, he expelled me from the triage room to the waiting room with a threat "to call security guards".


In the same period, in Royal Victoria Hospital's emergency department (site Glen), mine sample was, allegedly, somehow "mixed" with a sample of other patient. Dr. Mohindra said that a pathological bacterium was found, but refused to "disclose" the name of this bacterium under pretext that, allegedly, my sample was "confused" with other patient's sample. (Later I learned that it was a lie, because I found - in medical documents printouts - that, actually, unlawful actions and multiple deliberate violations (for the purpose to conceal and to destroy the medical data of the laboratory tests) have accompanied the lab tests from the very beginning, and that only one single component of the U test disappeared: the microbiology culture).


All these shocking medical crimes in March-April 2016 demanded a retrospective re-evaluation of everything that Dr. Morris said, did, refused, or commented. Such a re-evaluation through a prism of the later events forced to see his actions in a different light. Why (for example) Dr. Morris said (to me) that "antibiotics are not allowed to you any more"?


Most likely, they destroyed or made inaccessible the data on bacteria (April 7, 2016; Royal Victoria Hospital) - because they found a particular type of bacteria, which would call into question the safety of cystoscopy (on March 29, 2016), or because just ANY result of bacteria detection had to be "classified" (made a secret) by definition (in any Canadian medical institution) upon the demand of the enforcement agencies?


The legitimacy of such an assumption about the involvement of the enforcement agencies confirms the telephone call, which - again! - sounded in that very minute, when we came back home from the hospital and were opening the door into our apartment. It was (again!) a call from, allegedly, Canadian Federal Immigration department. And, again (!) this call came from the same telephone number, which was highlighted on the display caller on March 20, 2016, at the very moment, when I returned from Verdun Hospital's emergency department and was opening the door into my apartment.


The voice of the caller was the same as the voice of man, who already called from India on 2 other occasions, so, certainly, it was the same person.


The initiators of all 4 anonymous calls, certainly, coordinated their plot with Montreal police, because they had information about all my movements around the city of Montreal, and, especially, in the underground, between the Metro stations, and about time of my arrival home.


This information could be delivered only from here, from Montreal, and this call, and others - were coordinated only from here (from Ottawa and Montreal).


However, THIS TIME, the same call was repeated next day - April 8, 2016, at 9:00: see the image of the display caller ID of this (above described) terrorist call. (See below)


A call from - allegedly - Canadian Federal Immigration - at 9:00, in the morning on April 8, 2016. (While the previous similar call sounded in the very moment of our arrival home from the emergency department, before midnight, April 7, 2016, THIS (repeated) call was distributed in the morning, next day).


CHAPTER 2. April 8-29, 2016.


April 8-11, 2016

As I already reported above, the next day, in the morning (April 8, 2016), at 9:00, the same voice called again from the same telephone number 1-416-808-2222, allegedly, "from Immigration".


The man - speaking with an Indian accent in English, claimed that "here is an application form for revocation [cancellation] of Canadian citizenship for ..." (''), and he pronounced then my name and the name of my wife. This call came from number 1-416-808-2222, from the Canadian city of Toronto, and this telephone number, according to online search engines (such as Google), allegedly, belongs to police - or to a fraudulent firm.


The coincidence of these calls with my return home from medical institutions cannot be accidental.


Even 2 calls - coinciding, minute in a minute, with my return home from hospitals - cannot be accidental coincidences in any way.


And here were all 5 (or even 6 or 7 - judging by my schematic sketchy notes) calls:

1) at the moment of coming home from the Verdun Hospital [1-416-808-2222] (March 20, 2016);

2) at the moment of coming home from St.-Mary's Hospital [1-613-236-1222] (March 29, 2016); after cystoscopy);

3) at the moment of coming home from Royal Victoria (site Glen) Hospital [1-416-808-2222] (April 7, 2016);

4) and - next day - at 9:00, [1-416-808-2222] on April 8, 2016;

5) at the very moment of coming home from St. Mary's Hospital' emergency department [1-613-236-1222] (June 17, 2016).


All these calls arrived in March and in April 2016, and, then (one last), in June 2016, that - in addition - indicates their interrelation.


Besides, I must stress that I don't have a mobile ("cellular") phone, and all call I get - I receive on my home ("conventional", stationary) phone; and, consequently, this is an additional factor that points to secret services' (or secret societies') coordination regarding this provocation.


2 of 5 calls were made from India whereas 3 (including the call on April 8, 2916) - from Canada.


And it already excludes such an explanation as "simple", "innocent" and "merely" telemarketing advertising scam, or a "simple" fraud based on hunting for personal information. This was - for sure! - not a marketing scum also because the callers did not need, did not extort, and did not ask any information from me, and did not advertising anything. All 5 calls represented a pure classical threat provocation hinting about it political nature and link to Immigration enforcement agency, "untouchable" state (and its Canadian diaspora), my fight for patients' rights in quickly demonizing Canadian reality, and my former immigration case.


As some very influential figures within Russia and Republic of Belarus authoritarian's circles are not able to "excuse" me my fight for justice and fairness during the Soviet era, Canadian and foreign moral freaks-monsters have the same vindictive vampires' nature - thirsting for vengeance and blood-sucking "revenge".


2 last calls - coming from Canadian and Indian phone numbers indicate that everything is really very serious.


And the meaning of these calls did not promise anything good.


Someone threatened me, hinting that, in case of a leakage of the information about the medical crimes to the public, my existence could become even more pitiful, or could be transformed into non-existence, or, in addition, that they can take away - from my wife and me - the Canadian citizenship.


It was obvious (as well) that this threat goes much further than its literal sense, because the symbolical value of Canadian citizenship revocation in the context of all these circumstances: it is a death threat.


Evidently, the choice of time for these provocative calls in itself is frightening: at the time of my return home from hospitals on the peak of the health dramas and during the tortures, which I suffered from, - as well as the obvious sabotage of my computers after the procedure of cystoscopy.


In the same way, the impudent and outright sabotage of 2 laboratory samples was not less extreme clone of manipulations in St. Mary's Hospital's laboratory - which (it is obvious) were undertaken to hide the disappearance of the section of microbiology culture from the report-result of the test from March 2, 2015.


From the moment of my arrival to Canada in 1994, and up to 2000: I never faced improper treatment in medical institutions and had no conflicts with doctors.


The very first medical conflict was artificially generated by the Federal Ministry of Immigration (by its department of Immigration Medical Services), which is an enforcement security agency.


The purpose of the counterfeit diagnosis "tuberculosis", obviously, was to block the normal procedural tasks of accessing the Canadian permanent resident status and Canadian citizenship. It was a revenge for me accusation (in my refugee file) against the foreign state, which became the main center of influence on Canadian domestic and foreign policy.


When, in 2007, after being hit by car (under suspicious circumstances), I addressed to St.-Mary's Hospital's Emergency Room with my injuries (damaged blood vessels of both legs; deep vein thrombosis; danger of embolization; blood clots displacement, threatening by stroke or (and) heart failure; possible pseudo aneurysm or fistula; and multiple internal bleedings) - I was "kicked out" home from the emergency department of St. Mary's Hospital - been denied (despite my persistent numerous demands) EVEN (!) a veins ultrasound (Doppler), and any medical care in general.


My description of the road accident underwent comical, sarcastic, and abusive distortion in the hospital; my words were perverted; my demands to report the incident to police - ignored.


My own written statement to police (later): was ignored, too.


Since 2005, a campaign of intimidation and persecution by police was launched against me, and coincided (coupled) with the abrupt escalation of the above-mentioned provocations, persecutions, and incidents in health care institutions. Hundreds of cases of interceptions, stoppings, escorts, and interrogations by police (sometimes combined with searches), calls from police cars' window of, interceptions, etc. - followed.


Since, approximately, 2006, police frequently (and later almost always) escorted me on my way to medical institutions.


Thanks to friendly Montreal police officers, this campaign of intimidation had no tragic outcome, but it, certainly, worsened my state of health. If I lived in Toronto, Moscow, or New York, there I would have just 50 x 50 chances to stay alive, or end with lifelong cripples. Whoever provoked the police, inciting police against me, probably, expected such an outcome.


On April 8, 2016, I collected all my strength - and went to my family doctor (9:45).


On my way to the doctor and back, I was surveilled and escorted by police.


An attempt to get a referral on bladder ultrasound was my main goal, because I was looking to confirm or disprove the diagnosis "lithiasis" (uric stones), and - at the same time - to check up - what exactly (after all) occurred after cystoscopy; and, simultaneously, to verify if Dr. Morris told the truth about the uric stones, their size and quantity.


However, on my request to administrate an ultrasound test, my family doctor responded by refusal.


It became clear that any doctor working in the same hospital (or affiliated with the same hospital - as my family doctor) as Dr. Morris (in St.-Mary's Hospital): will not get permission to administrate an abdominal-pelvic ultrasound for me until it will be approved by Dr. Morris (or by those, who stand behind him).


Another epic was "happening" to the ultrasound of the wrist joint, administrated by the rheumatologist, Dr. Anna Khananyan, whom I began to visit after the expulsion by Dr. Krasny.


In 2015, Dr. Khananyan appointed an ultrasound of the same joint, and - at first - I made attempts to receive a rendezvous in St.-Mary's Hospital, but - when the faxed copy of requisition "was lost" there, I sent this requisition to a hospital, which radiology - according to my information - was not under the influence of that group of "hawks", who exposed me to repressions.


Whether it is surprising that "improbable adventures" occurred with this ultrasound requisition exactly there?


This epopee is described at length in the preceded parts of this chronicle.


The reason why I am mentioning about it here is because - after almost a year of sabotage - this procedure was scheduled for April 8, 2016, when I had an appointment with my family doctor, and when I was so suck due to post-cystoscopy's complications. I believe that this date was given deliberately since medical criminals have a full access to any patient's united file under the governmental "roof" of Sante Quebec, and aware about everything. This suggestion, particularly, is supported by the fact that - at first - this rendezvous for the wrist ultrasound was appointed for the end of 2015, but later was twice rescheduled - by Royal Victoria Hospital - first (still in 2015) for February 2016, and then (in March 2016) for April 8, 2016, at 11:00.


Of course, I was not able to pass this ultrasound on April 8, 2016 (as was explained above).


Only at the beginning of 2018 I was unexpectedly called from the same RVH radiology, and asked whether I will come to an ultrasonography procedure!


Here is the text of my fax concerning "the first phase" of these adventures:


Here it is said that in August, 2015, I called St-Mary's hospital - concerning the waiting list for ultrasonography (I also sent the requisition cope by fax). They promised to call back, but never contacted me.


In October, 2015, I called the help dispatcher of another hospital, and received a fax number for ultrasonography procedure - 514-934-8322.


In my archive of files, there is a confirmation that "on the other end of the wire" my fax was received. However, nobody called me from there, too. And, at last, having got an additional fax number, I sent the requisition to 514-843-1301, and also called by phone - number 514-934-4434. It would seem, at last, a date of the ultrasound procedure must be appointed, but... far from it... So, at first, a copy of this requisition (sent by fax) vanished in one hospital (trying to shorten the description, I skip the proofs: digital acquisitions of my faxes' receipts by hospital; sound files of the recordings of my conversations with the radiology's registry, etc.). And yet - with great difficulties - but I succeeded to register my name on the waiting list for ultrasonography, and soon received a date for this procedure (end of 2015).


However, after some time, they called me, and I was told that this procedure is postponed till the beginning of 2016. But this date was also not final. Soon I was called, and designated another date, and, after some time, they called me back again about a reassignment of this procedure again already for a new date, when I had an appointment with my family doctor: on April 8, 2016 (at 11:00). When I spoke by telephone with the radiology employer, who was calling me, I told him (it was a man) that I have another - very important - medical rendezvous on the same day - planned at 9:45. However, the calling man managed somehow to convince me that I can go for this (first) rendezvous in advance, asking an urgent reception (in connection with the ultrasound procedure), and, perhaps, to arrive in time, or to be late "for couple minutes". However, I immediately counted that I will not be able to be in time anyway, and - next day - called back, and told that I cannot pass the ultrasound on April 8, 2016, because I have another medical appointment scheduled for the same morning. They promised to call me back in next few days, but nobody called back.


The reason why I am mentioning about it here is because - after almost a year of sabotage - this procedure was scheduled for April 8, 2016, when I had an appointment with my family doctor, and when I was so sick due to post-cystoscopy's complications. I believe that this date was given deliberately since medical criminals have a full access to any patient's united file under the governmental "roof" of Sante Quebec, and aware about everything. This suggestion, particularly, is supported by the fact that - at first - this rendezvous for the wrist ultrasound was appointed for the end of 2015, but later was twice rescheduled - by Royal Victoria Hospital - first (still in 2015) for February 2016, and then (in March 2016) for April 8, 2016, at 11:00.


Of course, I was not able to pass this ultrasound on April 8, 2016 (as was explained above).


I called the office of Royal Victoria Hospital's radiology again, and reminded that I will not be able to come on April 8, 2016, to pass the ultrasound. However, a male medic - with whom I spoke - told me that "so far" still "nobody cancelled this ultrasound" appointment, and advised me "to try to be in time" on ultrasonography "after the doctor"; and if I - after all - will not be in time - it's OK (not disastrous) since he will place a special mark that the patient warned that he cannot be in time "minute in minute". And if I - after all - will not make it: then I'll receive another date.


On April 11, 2016, I sent a new fax to Royal Victoria Hospital concerning this ultrasound (of the wrist joint), informing that - after all - I was not in time after visiting my family doctor - on April 8, 2016 - and I ask to appoint a new date as possible quicker.


On the same Monday, April 11, 2016, I managed to contact (by phone) the Royal Victoria Hospital's ultrasound department, and they promised to call back "soon" and to appoint a new date. However, nobody called back, and, meanwhile, I was facing a wave of extremely dramatic events, and the wrist's ultrasound has moved into the shadow.


Only at the beginning of 2018, I was unexpectedly called from the same RVH radiology, and asked whether I will come to an ultrasonography procedure! Possibly, this procedure somehow slipped out from under control of "higher bodies" - because I not only could pass it, but also received an official confirmation of the existence of this joint's pathology (as one would expect).


On April 11, 2016, I made few phone calls to several medical specialists and communicated with the emergency department of Royal Victoria Hospital (at Glen site (phone number 514-934-1934-38737); I also sent faxes to RVH medical archive (in one of next attempts to learn what - after all - was reported about the bacterium that was found by the "controversial" analysis), and to the same emergency department. However, all my statements (including my report that Cipro - this time - was ineffective, and did not help); as well as other desperate requests for medical help - were cynically ignored. Nobody reacted, nobody answered my desperate calls to Royal Victoria Hospital; my appeal for help did not receive either attention, or a reply. Despite my explanation that the antibiotic Cipro is not working, and that I still continue suffering from ongoing pains; that I still have high temperature, fever, and symptoms of a dangerous urological infection; nobody listened to my SOS.


April 13, 2016

A rendezvous with my "former" (based outside of Montreal) urologist was appointed for April 13, 2016 (at 15:00). I came to this appointment with Dr. El-Hakim - despite my very bad health condition.


So, I managed to go to this rendezvous, and asked the doctor to perform the bladder calculi removal surgical operation - instead of Dr. Morris.


However, Dr. El-Hakim managed to persuade me (by then) "to stay" with Dr. Morris, because (besides other reasons) the bladder stones - as he absolutely fairly noticed, the uric stones are NOW infected (by the unnecessary cystoscopy and its complications), and now require an IMMEDIATE surgical operation. He told me that I have no other choices, but to wait for the scheduled mid-May operation by Dr. Morris.


If I'll cancel the surgery, scheduled by Dr. Morris, said Dr. El-Hakim, any other hospital may delay the surgery (artificially - as was clear by his tone) for an infinite time, so, that I'll have to wait to the end of my life, and, because of that, the end of my life will approach very quickly.


Therefore, as he explained, the delay of the operation can become a real tragedy.


He did not say directly that I'll be inevitably punished by the capital punishment for opposing to Dr. Morris, but he meant it.


Then he reminded (now switching to an "official" tone) that Dr. Morris is considered nearly the best urological surgeon in Montreal.


So, my appointment with Dr. El-Hakim was as fruitless as my appointment with Dr. Rohan on April 8, 2016. So, I went home again without a reassignment of the operation at other urologist.


April 20 - 26, 2016.

On April 20, 2016, when the 2-weeks course of antibiotics ended, the infection was not defeated; just weakened a bit. But just 1 day later (on April 22, 2016) the full-scale infection returned.


I had same symptoms and problems again, as before.


On April 25, 2016, with Dr. El-Hakim's requisition [he, it turned out, appeared to be an only medical specialist, who showed compassion and adequately (not like an executioner-torturer, but humanly) treated my appeals for help] I passed a urine test + culture (microbiology) in a private laboratory outside of Montreal (in the suburbs).


This analysis positively identified the infection and its microorganism culture: Enterococcus Faecalis bacterium. Now positive and CLEAR results of the infection identification approached (in the end of 2016) totally to 7 (since 2001), and ALL of them I passed not in Montreal, and / or on requisitions of non-Montreal doctors. How to explain that dozens of microbiology culture tests in Montreal laboratories, on requisitions of Montreal doctors, NEVER bared a positive result, and EVERY ONE of just 3 (before the end of 2016), and - in the end of 2016 - 6-7 similar tests - outside of Montreal, or on requisitions of non-Montreal doctors, was EVERY TIME positive, and clearly identified the bacterium? No "coincidental randomness" can explain such a "chance". An only explanation signifies that ALL of microbiology culture tests in Montreal were fabricated or were declared "missing", "lost", or "confused" with other patient".


I believe that it was a secondary infection, provoked and strengthened by another infection that could be detected after cystoscopy before the course of antibiotics, but an open (and - this time - blatantly overt) sabotage of the bacterial culture test in RV Hospital destroyed a chance for identifying it.


On my way to the laboratory and back home, the police observed me, without lagging behind me on a step.


Among dozens of urinalyses (with microbiology culture), only 3 were clearly positive (and genuine) from 2001 till mid-2016, and all 3 were connected with doctors or laboratories outside Montreal.


The conclusion is absolutely obvious: any of my analyses, potentially positive (regarding an infection), done in Montreal and at the request of Montreal doctors: had to be destroyed or altered.


On probability theory, 3 absolutely similar coincidences from 2001 to 2015 (all 3 analyses - passed outside of Montreal, or administrated by non-Montreal doctors), which indicated an infection, are - most likely - improbable (against dozens done in Montreal), but, as the total number of positively identified an infection tests from the laboratories outside of Montreal increased to 6 or 7 (coincidences) in 2016, this phenomenon represents an obvious impossibility.


But there is more to come.


2 analyses done in Montreal and administrated by Montreal doctors, which found an infection, did not contain any data on infection's causative agent (a concrete bacterial culture), and, thus, presented an incomplete, "defective" result. One of them - is the report of the laboratory analysis from January 8, 2003, where it was specified that 2 urological infection's bacteria found in the sample, but this clause was accompanied by a reference remark: "see below", but there is nothing "below" there. Both of these documents (laboratory analyses) were already displayed in the previous sections of this chronicle.


The loss of data on a concrete bacterium every time destroyed a potential success of antibiotic therapy - because that data was necessary in order to know - what antibiotic to appoint, in what dose, and for what term. Together with innumerous missing, incomplete, disappeared (which list will not fit in a printout of one - or even in several pages), or falsified and incorrect analyses (and other medical exams), these 2 analyses represent an evidence of systematic, centralized, coordinated, and covered up by the mutual (collective) responsibility sabotage from 2001 to 2016.


Against the background of the aforesaid, the fact that only 3 (and, together with 2016-s reports: 6 or 7) analyses (against dozens passed in Montreal) analyses passed outside of Montreal or on requisitions of non-Montreal doctors, were positive, did not vanish into nowhere, arrived without omission of pages, and ALL 3 (ALL 6 in 2016) found a concrete bacterium: not an accidental "coincidence".


April 27, 2016.

On April 27, 2016 (i.e. exactly in a month after cystoscopy) I managed to pass an abdominal-pelvic ultrasound scan in a hospital outside Montreal - to: 1) exclude or confirm the diagnosis "bladder stones"; 2) see, which damage did the cystoscopy.


When I asked the female technician whether there are any symptoms of nephrolithiasis, or bladder stones, polyps, cysts, etc., she flatly refused to answer my questions, emphasizing that it is "against the rules" and that she is "not authorized" to disclose the preliminary results to patients.


However, when I asked her about the bladder stones, she willingly answered that there are positively some uric stones in the bladder.


Applying a simple logic, it is possible to come to a conclusion that - if she is not authorized (in principle) to speak to patients about any preliminary assumptions, she had to keep silence also about the bladder stones.


If I had no bladder stones before cystoscopy (which suggests a presence of uric "sand", or a substance (chemicals), which generate a rapid formation of uric stones), then it is natural to expect that the forces behind this plot would suppress any leaks of the truth, by commanding doctors-radiologists and technicians to lie to the patient about the presence of, allegedly, relatively gross uric stones BEFORE their artificially generated and accelerated formation.


Not accidently, my access to the result-report of this particular ultrasound was unlawfully blocked for a long period of time, and this made its findings and its conclusions useless for me anyway.


Without having an access to 27-3-2016 ultrasound's result, and knowing only about the oral statement of the technician, I could only guess that - if this ultrasound has positively identified bladder stones, there are could be 2 probabilities: 1) if to trust the ultrasound result from February 3, 2016, which did not find any stones, it is possible to assume that the stones appeared later, possibly - theoretically - after the cystoscopy; 2) there are no stones in the bladder, and the operation may be performed for no reasons at all.


This suggestion can be widened and brought to more possibilities:


1) if to trust the result of February 3, 2016 ultrasound, which did not find any uric stones, it is possible to assume that the calculi (stones) appeared later, possibly (theoretically) - after cystoscopy;

2) if to trust the Computer Tomography (March, 2016) - then it turns out that the February 2016 ultrasound was a fake;

3) there are no stones in a bladder, and the surgery operation might be performed for no reason at all;

4) if 27-3-2016 ultrasound has indeed positively identified the bladder stones (after not even full 3 months following the February ultrasound) - then the February 2016 ultrasound was definitely a falsification (sabotage), which purpose was a) to conceal Dr. Morris's medical crimes; and b) not to allow me to escape from Dr. Morris to another urologist, who could administrate calculi removal surgery instead of Dr. Morris.


During the whole month of April 2016, I called the office of Dr. Morris innumerous times, insisting on an appointment, and also demanded an access to cystoscopy's report, but was denied both an appointment and an access to cystoscopy's result. One time, when I called Dr. Morris's office, and his secretary responded to my call, I heard the voice of Dr. Morris, and asked if I can speak directly with him. His secretary said that Dr. Morris is busy, and will not be able to speak with me, but - by her tone, intonations, and accents - she hinted that Dr. Morris is very angry at me.


CHAPTER 3. May 2016.


MAY, 2016.


May 3, 2016.

On May 3, 2016, I went to St.-Mary's Hospital for the last preparations for the surgery: cardiogram and essential analyses; instructions; and other procedures.


All this is at 8 in the morning, on the 1-st floor, room number G300.


Awareness that all these 15 years of torments and this unnecessary surgery (which could be prevented by proper medical treatment) - were the products of the spiteful revenge of monsters, and that the utmost damage inflicted Dr. Morris, who now received an authority to perform an operation on me and to decide my life or death: was unbearable. Being operated by Dr. Morris was for me the same as to go to the slaughter. Even if Dr. Morris would do no more harm to me, his very presence during the surgery was for me equal for being doomed for immolation.


However, what he did to me by cystoscopy and by his post-cystoscopy's action did not foretell anything good.


The doctor, who was carrying out the preoperative exams, Dr. Segal, was a good man. He prescribed antibiotics (at my request). When I asked about what he thinks of Dr. Morris, of his attitude towards some patients, and whether it is dangerous to be operated by a surgeon, who is angry at his patient to such a degree that does not even greet him, Dr. Segal answered that "it is a long time as" Dr. Morris is "around here". He told nothing else.


So far, as I sat in this office while underwent all preoperative procedures, I felt a palpable panic generated by the fear of the operation at Dr. Morris.


Trying to overcome this fear of this doctor by logical arguments, trying to convince myself that he is one of the best surgeons in Montreal, and that he will, apparently, do nothing "bad" to me, I recalled all awful things that he ALREADY did to me: and could not overcome this uncontrollable fear of Dr. Morris. It was at this very moment, when the first wave of an evident depression covered me: which never happened in my life. I had to experience a lot of hardships, but I never had a depression. I still had to learn that it is the terrible experience, even more horrible than any pain and any disease. And this is what Dr. Morris did to me.


The cardiogram - for the first time in my life - appeared to be not normal. It was a direct consequence of the actions of Dr. Morris, medical and police persecutions, mockeries and abuses, to which I was exposed recently in medical institutions (and, first of all - in the emergency departments), and systematic sabotage of my laboratory tests and other exams. An especially big blow to my health inflicted the latest wild incidents in the emergency departments of MGH, Verdun and Royal Victoria hospitals, and all medical crimes of Dr. Morris, in particularly - the cystoscopy in 2016.


THE CARDIOGRAM. MAY 3, 2016 (see below):


This cardiogram (see above) (May 3, 2016) has shown some pathological abnormalities, clearly noticeable for anyone, who is familiar with the basics of cardiogram reading. It reads like the following: "Abnormal R-Wave progression; early transition".


May 4, 2016, Wednesday.

After May 3, 2016 - apparently, on May 4th, 2016 (the record about the exact date is lost) - I called the preoperative bureau of the St. Mary's Hospital - and asked to delay the lithiasis surgery appointed to May 16, 2016, at Dr. Morris.


I also asked to open for me the access to the cystoscopy report, which was carried out by Dr. Morris, and to preoperative analyses and cardiogram.


The female medical worker, who spoke with me by phone with a Quebec French accent, answered that they "cannot" open the access to the medical information demanded by me, avoiding to discuss with me a cancellation or a delay of the operation.


Then, I did an attempt to explain to her that this information is vital for me for drawing a conclusion concerning the danger to my life and my health of 1) any surgery done by Dr. Morris; and 2) operation carried out in such a moment, when I still have an acute infection, and hematologic and other indicators in the laboratory tests contraindicated to operation.


She answered that it will be solved by doctors and that they know - when an operation is contraindicated, and when not. I objected to her words, saying that I have a very negative experience in this regard, and that I insist on immediate opening for me the access to medical information.


Then I did another attempt to bring up the subject of a delay or cancellation of operation.


At this moment, someone else began to talk to me in English; someone without the French Quebec accent. It was weird and menacing, because - when you dialed a phone number, and began to speak on the phone with one person (who responded), and, suddenly, a voice of another anonymous person (who did not present himself - as well) interrupts your conversation: it - naturedly - perceived as something scary.


This - second - person stated to me that this is a prerogative of Dr. Morris, and that "it is not possible" to cancel or delay the surgery "without Dr. Morris", so, "to resolve this issue", it should "be coordinated with him".


I objected, pointing to the fact that a patient has the right to cancel operation independently, without receiving a medical permission, but nobody wanted to listen to me.


Then - in the evening - I sent a fax of the following content to the office of St. Mary's preoperative bureau. In my fax I said that...

1) I will agree to pass the operation at Dr. Morris (scheduled on May 16, 2016) only if I am given an access to cystoscopy (March 29, 2016) report, and also to the results of preoperative analyses and cardiogram;

2) I have to obtain guarantees that if - after the operation appointed to May 16, 2016, - something does not go well, I will be able to receive an urgent, qualified and adequate help from Dr. Morris or from St. Mary's Hospital: because - having the most serious, life-threatening post-cystoscopy's complications, - I was denied - by Dr. Morris - any medical help, and was subjected to sabotage of my laboratory tests, to death threats, and to unusual and cruel treatment in McGill medical centers; and

3) my present state of health, undermined by Dr. Morris, may be not suitable for an immediate surgical operation; and, besides, it is scary to lay down "under the scalpel" of Dr. Morris, who is so angry at his patient (at me) that does not want to greet me and to speak with me.


Such is the narrative of my 2-nd fax (2-nd version, which was harsher). Why I sent 2 versions - it is because I thought that my 1-st fax was unanswered. This also explains why I was forced to compose the 2-nd version, and why it was tougher.


May 5-7, 2016, Saturday.

Next day, May 5-th, I sent a fax to the office of Dr. Morris, with a request

1) to open for me an access to cystoscopy data;

2) to open for me an access to the copies of preoperative analyses and cardiogram;

3) to discuss the degree of danger of any surgical operation at this moment, taking into consideration presumably not completely safe cardiogram, which is, probably, abnormal (my suggestions proved to be true later); presumably abnormal hematologic indicators; acute urological infection, which only worsens right now; and other factors;

4) to discuss the warranties of medical care in case of port-operative complications;

5) to discuss a possibility of delaying the surgery if it represents a special danger at the present moment.


As a result, the operation was cancelled, and - in day of operation and at the same time (when I had to lay down on Dr. Morris's operating table (May 16, at 9:00) - I signed all papers on operation with my former (non-Montreal) urologist, Dr. El-Hakim. It appeared not simple to persuade him. He agreed to perform the operation on me not until I explained that this operation at Dr. Morris is ALREADY cancelled anyways. As - for its cancellation, FORMALLY it was cancelled not by me, but by Dr. Morris (this will be described later).


Before passing to the description of further events, it is necessary to shed light on other dramatic affairs from May 5 to May 16, 2016.


On the same day, May 5, 2016, I made several calls to the office of Dr. Morris (we'll speak about their content a bit later).


As it was already told, I managed to pass a "control" abdominal-pelvic ultrasound test, but the access to its result was blocked for me. I could also judge indirectly if there are bladder stones and how dangerous they are at the present stage by the results of the preoperative analyses, but my access to these analyses' results was blocked as well. All my oral (verbal) and written demands to let me see the cystoscopy data, the preoperative analyses reports, the cardiogram, and the ultrasound's report, and to get copies: were ignored, or, to be more precisely, doctors (including Dr. Morris), secretaries, and bureaucrats openly scoffed that I can get these medical documents only over their dead bodies.


2 doctors, at my request, showed me - in the computer - the result of cystoscopy from hospital' digital database. I was stunned. Right after cystoscopy, Dr. Morris told me that there are 4 stones, and that each of them is about 1 cm, and that they are made up of calcium (without specifying if it is the phosphate calcium). But - in his official report - nothing was told neither about the size of stones, nor about their probable structure, nor about their place in the bladder, etc.


It was stunningly strange. (See the copy of cystoscopy's report above).


For now, I did not manage to get the printout of this result (report).


On Thursday and Friday, May 5 and 6, 2016, I called Dr. Morris many times, and asked to provide me the copy of cystoscopy result. And it was REFUSED to me!


Not only that such a refusal was a violation of rules, laws, and regulations, but earlier even Dr. Morris nevertheless provided me the requested copies (yes, only after my innumerous persistent demands, but still...).


But even such violations of medical ethics, medical laws and regulations appeared to be not the most astonishing. At first, Dr. Morris's secretary was ready to fax me the copy of the cystoscopy's report. Then (while the doctor, avoiding to speak with me directly, whispered something to her - directly into her ear) she told that she is not allowed to send medical documents by fax. They (the doctor and his secretary) knew about my pitiful health state, and expected that I'll will not be able physically to go to Dr. Morris's office. However, I answered that, in that case, I will arrive now and will pick up the copy myself.


As soon as they realized that I have enough courage to go to Dr. Morris's office - despite my sickness, - the secretary (on Dr. Morris's order!) said that the official report of cystoscopy "will arrive" only in 2 months: as if this cystoscopy's official report was prepared by another doctor in another hospital!


Listening to their lie and wondering - how can they so radically and so quickly change their statement, I was thinking: to whose hands is given our lives! Medics-liars and medics-executioners are the Scourge of God!


I said that - if the access to cystoscopy's data is blocked to me on all other channels, I must address to the College of Medics for help.


A silence firmly established at the other end of the line...


Then, after another round of whispers, the secretary agreed to hand me over the cystoscopy's report [just few moments ago she "swear" that the report "will arrive" only after 2 months!] if I show up in person to pick up the copy, but added that she must call back.


Nobody called back, neither the same day, nor in the following days.

If doctors and hospitals stopped playing humanitarian missioners, and openly uncovered their true cynical nature and their true ugly faces, blocking me the access to medical data: it meant that they had what to hide.


Isn't their self-contradictory and confused statements an evidence that something outstanding was going there?!


And now - I provide more details about these telephone negotiations.


On May 5, 2016, in the morning, after sending the above-mentioned fax, at 14:24 I made the 1-st phone call to Dr. Morris's office.


I reminded to Dr. Morris's secretary that - when I had serious post-cystoscopy's complications (including an acute infection with very serious condition), and called Dr. Morris's office, begging to provide medical help - left messages on the answering machine, sent faxes: everything was in vain. My addresses to Dr. Morris were ignored, and nothing remained, but to turn to emergency room (I came to Royal Victoria Hospital).


Then I depicted laconically that whole nightmare, which I had to endure there, such results of the laboratory analyses, which could frighten even not a nervous person; fever; bleeding with gross blood clots; high temperature around 39C; ischuria; 20 thousand leucocytes, etc.


I said that I wish Dr. Morris should know this, and that I would like to speak with him if possible, because I know that he must be in his office today.


At 14:47, I called back in the office of Dr. Morris again, and said that - before talking to the doctor - I would like to receive the copy of the of March 29, 2016, cystoscopy's report.


The secretary found this paper, and - at first - was ready to send it to by fax (despite her hesitation).


Then she suddenly told that she must talk over "5 minutes" with Dr. Morris.


But, before I was disconnected, it seemed to me that I heard Dr. Morris's voice, who whispered something directly to her ear.


At 16:59, the secretary called me back from the office of Dr. Morris, and - when I asked her at what time, finally, she'll be ready to send me the cystoscopy's report, she answered that, MAY BE "they" will send it "next week".


I asked - why just "next week", why not now?


She answered that it is "because we are not allowed to send it, because it's new".


On May 6, at 10:08, I called the office of Dr. Morris again, and - this time - already distinctly heard the mutter of Dr. Morris, who instructed the secretary how to answer me. Thus, it was clear that he did not wish to take the call and to speak with me directly.


And, again, I demanded an access to cystoscopy's report, which, I said, should be submitted by fax.


Now, the secretary told already resolutely and irrevocably that "we have no right to send the report". (Whereas - under the law, on the contrary: a doctor has no right to refuse a copy of laboratory analysis or another exam's report (including cystoscopy) to his patient).


So, now, Dr. Morris's secretary did not even try to play for time any more, and did not say that, supposedly, "they" will be able to send the cystoscopy's report "next week". It meant that I will not receive it next week, next month: ever.


Then I noticed that, if Dr. Morris, apparently, has to be near somewhere, let address this issue to him.


The secretary, almost without lowering her voice, immediately addressed aloud to Dr. Morris, saying to him that "the patient insists" on obtaining the copy of the cystoscopy's result. But Dr. Morris, in turn, passed to whisper though spoke rather loudly before.


After receiving his instructions, the secretary said that they, allegedly, "have no right to send medical documents by fax", and that, "if I want to get it", I must be physically in the office and to pick it out with my own hands.


I was still very sick due to post-cystoscopy's tremendous complications, and they knew it - and took advantage of it. However, in spite of my state, I answered that I am ready to come to pick up the document at any time, and asked - when to come.


She said that they work only till 14:00 today, and it means that I - supposedly - have to "come to take it in other day".


I pretended that I do not understand, and - once again - asked if I can come right now. (If they work till 14:00, and now it just 20 minutes 10:20, then why - logically - I cannot receive the document today!?).


Then the secretary suddenly asked - what date the cystoscopy was done (as though they don't know it!). [The date was, certainly, marked on the cystoscopy report. If it was not just a next deceptive trick, then it meant that they do not have the cystoscopy's report in their own hands, and are preparing a fake report.]


I named the date: March, 8, 2016.


Now, she finally and resolutely that I will be able to receive the cystoscopy's report only in 2 months, because only in 2 months they "will receive" it.


I replied that a) 2 months for an urgent cystoscopy's report is an unprecedentedly long time; b) thus, the cystoscopy, which provoked unspeakable suffering and life-threatening complications, and which necessity was motivated by its alleged inevitability for the lithiasis surgery - appears to be senseless; c) isn't Dr. Morris himself (who performed the cystiscopy) has to prepare the report? (I meant that, proceeding from her words, he has to send this report to himself, but this is a nonsense). Besides, I specified, it is enough for me to see the preliminary report, or the procedure working summary, which MUST exist by the most basic norms, protocols, and regulations.


I also added that the operation, which has to take place in 10 days, has to be based, among other things, on cystoscopy's report, and it does not allow any postponement of its result for entire whole 2 months (it would make more than 3 months from the date of cystoscopy!).


But the secretary was relentless, and did not listen to any arguments, or, to be precise, it is Dr. Morris did not wish to listen to anything - and was relentless. He had something very serious to conceal and to hide.


Then, I said, if so, in that case - I will be forced to cancel the operation, because - without seeing the cystoscopy's result, I have no trust to Dr. Morris, not even an elementary confidence to him. Dr. Morris defalcated me, when, by force, persuaded me to agree to a pre-surgical invasive procedure - cystoscopy, - claiming that 1) without cystoscopy it is impossible to do the cycto-litholopaxy operation (now, as it appeared, it was a lie); 2) cystoscopy will clear up if the CT-scan was true about the bladder stones, i.e. which of 2 scans - ultrasonography [February 3, 2016], or the computer tomography [March 8, 2016] was true, and which was mistaken: 3) for my own, allegedly, calm, the cystoscopy will leave no doubts about the bladder stones. Now, it turns out that he lied on all points, if the cystoscopy is not connected to the forthcoming operation in any way.


Now, the secretary told that they still must to talk over the matter, and she will call back to me as soon as possible.


What else astonished me in that situation - is that Dr. Morris (who participated in the conversation indirectly, whispering in his secretary's ear) and his secretary did not interrupt my arguments, and spent more than 30 minutes, talking to me. It reveals that this conversation contained something extremely important to Dr. Morris, and I can guess - what. By unknown reasons, the cancellation of the surgery by him, and my address to another surgeon-urologist for this operation was near a professional disaster for him, and he did everything possible to keep me with him for the surgery. However, even for the sake of the operation, he did not want or could not to open for me an immediate access to cystoscopy's report, and this was the most frightening and biggest mystery.


On the same day, I called Dr. Morris's office 2 more times, and both times the secretary pretended that does not remember any more about our conversations, and both times I was forced to start the whole talk and to explain everything from the scratch. And both times I repeatedly stressed that, if there is no final, conclusive cystoscopy's rapport around, then I demand - at least the preliminary report, or a working procedure's formularies. And - again - the secretary replied that I can get it, but, when I declared that will come and I will pick it up myself, she told that she will call back about it. However, she did not call back, and, then, I called once again, but now Dr. Morris's office telephone was unavailable. I left my message with answering machine in vain.


And, as one would expect, nobody, of course, called back.


The most mysterious enigma: it is for what reason in general Dr. Morris had to hide the cystoscopy's report.


One of the possible hypothesis: is that Dr. Morris could not allow me to know (at least - now) that the cystoscopy's report mentioned only the number of calculi (4), but not their sizes, and this fact automatically puts in doubt both cystoscopy's report, and the real presence of bladder stones. He might already know from the system administrators, or from the remarks in the medical database that 2 altruistic doctors accessed and demonstrated - to me - cystoscopy's report in the system, but he, certainly, did not know if they informed me about the report verbally, or I could see the computer screen, or even photographed the monitor's image.


That's why he could not alter now the cystoscopy's report and for falsifying it: because other doctors already saw it, and because his patient could already have a copy. This is why he needed from few months to 1 year - until the attention to cystoscopy would end, and the immediate post-cystoscopy's report will be forgotten. He clearly understood that his words spoken during this procedure - and its report: contradict each other, and that there is a number of very suspicious details in this report.


Another question is that - if he was still planning to fabricate a forged version of the cystoscopy's report, which do not correspond to what was "seen" (to justify his actions and to shade his medical errors), - why he could do it instantly, on March 29? One of the possible explanations is that he made the preliminary report together with his colleagues, and was afraid to take a risk.


But, still, basically, even if recall back the "fantastic" idea that there were NO bladder stones BEFORE cystoscopy: it is still unclear - why it was so necessary closing the access to cystoscopy's summary. Dr. Morris aspired to confirm CT-scan's diagnosis "lithiasis" (uric stones in the bladder): and he did so. What else did he was looking for, and what sense was to hide this confirmation?


The sense appears only in case of assumption that Dr. Morris planned to modify the cystoscopy's report in dependency of how the operation of the laser lithotripsy will go, and also if he was going to use the surgery for cover up of his medical crimes.


Not occasionally, Dr. Morris misinformed me, concealing the cystoscopy's conclusion about the need of another, inevitable additional surgery: for excision of the calcified part of the uterus outlet; he did not want to let me know that he not only provoked the formation of bladder stones, but also provoked another serious problem, by not administration the effective conservative therapy in time, or not planning this surgical operation back in 2013-2014 (in that case, no bladder stones would be formed, and no need in 2 surgeries would appear).


It is not excluded that he - in addition - was not sure that he is capable to control his anger and irritation at the obstinate patient during the litholopaxy operation, and was not sure if this will lead (during the surgery) to any wild outcomes or incidents, and - then - the modification of cystoscopy's report AFTER the operation - depending on what tasks would stand in that case for the purpose of cover up, - would have an enormous value.


And that malice, that rage, which seized Dr. Morris because his victim slipped out from his hands, receive - in that case - a logical explanation.


And the fact that Dr. Morris, having deleted me from the list of his patients and having cancelled an URGENT operation - DID NOT REFER me URGENTLY to another urologist, and did not arranged the same operation in other hospital, speaks about itself. I give an opportunity to the reader to characterize a medical doctor, who could leave a patient that need an URGENT surgery, in such a dramatic situation, denying any medical help.


Moreover, when I sent him a fax, in which demanded to administrate further procedures on transferring me to another urologist and to transfer the surgery - cancelled by him - to another urologist-surgeon, Dr. Morris did not even reply to my fax.


ALL THIS proves a singular, extraordinary pattern in the behavior of Dr. Morris, showing that he was capable of anything, and that - no doubt - an operation performed by him was threaten me with a highest danger...


And, though the intuition cannot be taken into account as an argument (while, still, as my panic of operation at Dr. Morris (which provoked a deep depression) was generated by Dr. Morris's actual inhuman actions) probably possible (or it is even necessary), my intuition and my fear were based also on some subconscious enlightenments, on some unconscious observations, which, without being expressed in the logical conclusions at the conscious level, nevertheless, formed the correct emotional and estimated representations somewhere on the periphery of the consciousness.


Those days I repeatedly dreamed the same dream, in which someone's voice said - as a spell - "Reims library", which was followed by the visualization of the IDENTITY of the Black Panther that transformed into a young woman of strong-willed type in a black suit (trousers and jacket) of official style, and by the demonstration of the fragility of bookshelves' (of a strange view and design) fastening with the wall, kept tightened with the wall in the "unearthly" "chemical" way, by means of "ginger" color "thaw-droplets" (like a hint on some - "sealed" by the same reddish substance - bullets?).


Only (running forward) in one and a half years (December 2017) - I accidentally heard that Dr. Morris, appears, studied in Reims (France), and - in December of the 2016, - among other papers on Dr. Morris's secretary's table, noticed a logo with an image of a black panther, and only having gone outside from his office - remembered that dream.


It is necessary to remind again about the refusal of Dr. Morris of transrectal ultrasonography, uroflow test, ultrasound exam with the residual bladder's content's test, MRI, and CT-scan, instead of the invasive cystoscopy in the past years.


Why he steadily refused - year by year - these simple diagnostic procedures?


Meanwhile, uroflow test; ultrasound exam with the residual bladder's content's assessment; MRI; prostate MRI; CT-scan (up to the ill-fated March, 2016); and transrectal ultrasound scan - for all 16 years (from the very beginning of the urological drama in 2001) - remained the main subjects of the medical sabotage, along with the tests for microbiology (identification of the bacteriological culture).


An only difference is that the microbiology culture tests were exposed to the sabotage in the medical institutions (laboratories, and beyond), then, the MRI, transrectal and abdominal-pelvic ultrasound scan, computer tomography, etc. - were sabotaged in doctors' offices, who, stubbornly and persistently, for 16 years (!) steadily refused requisitions on these diagnostic procedures. Nevertheless, despite the persistent refusals of doctors, I - after all - managed to get 4 or 5 referrals for transrectal ultrasonography (again: running forward), but all of them underwent sabotage already during the procedure: always being replaced by a usual ultrasound, or an ultrasound scan was cancelled in general.


However, since 2001, despite systematic refusals of above mentioned tests, I managed to obtain an access to ultrasound scans (4 or 5 times) thanks to non-Montreal doctors, and my family doctor, and 1 time (I think) the referral was given by Dr. Morris. However, MRI, uroflow test, CT-scan, transrectal ultrasound, and ultrasound exam with the residual bladder's content's assessment: these exams were never made available to me. The CT-scan and the ultrasound exam with the residual bladder's content's assessment were administrated when it was too late, and the consequences of the 15-years refusals became already non-reversible.


Only in March, 2016, against the background of the extensive bleeding (gross hamaturia + hematochezia) and other critical symptoms, Dr. Morris appointed the CT scan.


As for the transrectal scan, only my family doctor, who remained my lifesaver, and to whom I addressed with those requests (as to the latest instance), which all other doctors refused, on November 15, 2015, channelized me on transrectal scan. I called the radiology of hospital St. Mary's, sent them the requisition by fax, and received the date for this diagnostic procedure. However, days before passing this scan (probably, on December 16, 2013), my family doctor told me in a confidential, trustworthy tone - that, on my place, he would cancel it (would not pass it). It was stated as a personal - friendly - council, and I puzzled for a long time - cracking what he wanted to tell by this. But he managed to intrigue me and to frighten me so that I began to hesitate, and my determination to undergo this procedure was corrupted. And in 3 or 4 days prior to this procedure the police intimidation has suddenly intensified, having amplified to such an extent that I literally could not leave my home. Several times I was practically turned back home by police officers, who were - in the literal sense - keeping me under the house arrest.


In most cases, police acted as following.


When I used to exit from home, there has to be already stationed a police car near my house (how the police used to learn [5-6 minutes prior to my exit] - that I am just about to appear in the street - remains a riddle). As soon as I began to walk, this car accompanied me with my speed (with the pedestrian's speed); then police officers opened the car window, ordering me to approach, interrogated me (where I go, where I live, what I am intended to do), then forced me to show physically my residential place, compelling me to return home, to the entrance; and, since the police car did not leave, the only way to stop this intimidation - was to come into the house and to return to my apartment.


Twice I was "saved" from police by my wife and my younger daughter, having existing from the house towards me at the entrance, and having orally confirmed for police that I am I.


Twice I was intercepted by police right near my home, and was held in the street for almost 20-30 min. (by 2 police cars), interrogated and intimidated.


Then I called the hospital - and cancelled the transrectal scan.


Later, my family doctor - nevertheless - appointed transrectal scan 2 more times, but both times this procedure was exposed to sabotage in hospitals. Still, later, 2 more doctors appointed a similar ultrasonography - and again - it was sabotaged. For example, one time I came to pass the uterus transrectal scan to MG Hospital, and the technician told that they are not doing this exam. When I started to enquire, the chef doctor came in, and merely performed an ordinary abdominal-pelvic ultrasound scan.


The transrectal ultrasound scan was refused by Dr. Jast, Dr. Pharand, Dr. Morris, Dr. Semret, doctors in walk-in clinics, and doctors of emergency departments. When they refused a transrectal ultrasound scan, I demanded to replace it by MRI scan of the uterus, but Dr. Pharand, Dr. Morris, and other doctors refused it, too. However, I believe that Dr. Morris knew about the real serious state of my problems (which he always refuted and ignored) very well without any special diagnostic procedures.


See below the image of November 15, 2013, requisition for transrectal uterus scan - without biopsy. At least, Dr. Rohan told me that he's prescribing the transrectal ultrasound:


Issued on November 15, 2015, requisition for transrectal uterus scan. Doctor's writing is not completely clear, but he told that he is appointing a transrectal scan.


The same concerns the requisition issued by my family doctor (at my request) on July 13, 2016; signing it, the doctor told that - repeatedly (after 2013) - he appointed a transrectal scan. It was during the most dramatic period of my health problems, and the requisition was marked as "urgent". From the administrative point of view, a clear result of this exam could persuade medical bureaucrats to place me into the urgency category of patients, which could produce an urgent medical intervention - helping to end my suffering as fast as possible.


Having come home and having attentively studied this document, I concluded that a transrectal ultrasound scan is not clearly specified here, but only an "abdominal-pelvic" scan is suggested.


Nevertheless, I addressed in radiology at once, and the procedure was appointed to June 29, 2016.


Therefore, having attended an appointment with my family doctor on Wednesday, July 20, 2016, I raised a question about it.


The doctor objected to my concerns, pointing that, I, likely, did not crack his medical handwriting, and that, actually, he specified the abdominal-pelvic scan - and ALSO the transrectal scan of the uterus.


I did not have with me that requisition paper (I left it at home) and, therefore, could not show it, and discontinued this conversation, but asked the doctor to call St. Mary's Hospital's ultrasound department requesting to include the transrectal ultrasonography into the procedure: if it was not specified by them. Practicing a human approach to his patients, this doctor pleased my request, and called the hospital.


Then I checked myself in the radiology of St. Mary's Hospital - concerning the transrectal scan, - and received a confirmation that it is specified in the procedure's details "according to doctor's order".


However, when I came to medical procedures room, only the ultrasonography was done, but not the transrectal scan (see below).


The requisition of my family doctor on (as he told me) "transrectal scan" given out on July 13, 2016. Front.


The requisition of my family doctor on (as he told me) "transrectal scan" (July 13, 2016). Back.

The date of the procedure is written by hand by the nurse.


Ultrasound's report (July 29, 2016).


Comparing to other abdominal-pelvic ultrasound scans, which reported serious problems, this report is actually concealing all these problems, and, thus, can not be considered authentic. Besides the transrectal scan was sabotages again. As practically all phony ultrasound reports, this summary is pretending that the adequate and more precise study was, allegedly, "obscured" by the bowel gases, which is untrue. Sinai and activated coil before every medical scan procedure, empty stomach, and my special notes, which mark everything accompanied every such procedure, guarantee that no issues like "bowel gases" were noticed. In addition, I was so skinny in 2016 that my body could be easily "seen" by any ultrasound scan.


The first precedent, when this excuse was used as a justification for medical scanning "blindness", took place on March 8, 2016 (CT-scan, administrated by Dr. Morris), and this was not coincidental, because this scan was - in general - very suspicious. The same remark about the "gases" - since March 2016 - wanders now from summary to summary, from one report to the next report, and it cannot be either a "mere coincidence", or a reflection of a real situation.


Under the same pretext they actually sabotaged further normal results of stomach X-rays, and other radiographic procedures.


I am sure that - if not the systematic sabotage of the microbiology culture tests, and not the blockage of the access to such diagnostic procedures as a CT-scan, MRI and transrectal ultrasonography, etc., then, even in 2012, it was still possible to understand the main problem, and to solve it by conservative therapeutic methods, or, as a last resort, by one (and only) single surgical procedure, without all dreadful consequences and complications.


Running forward, let's review some later events (in the end of 2016).


After receiving the cystoscopy's report (despite the artificial obstructions, erected by Dr. Morris), on November 11, 2016, I sent a fax to Dr. Morris, demanding to clear up some moments in his official cystoscopy's report (and, especially, the phrase "obstructive from veru"), which could radically help with the planning of the future 2-nd urological operation and during its procedure. (See below)


Fax to Dr. Morris; November, 11, 2016.


Again, running forward: on Tuesday, December 13, 2016, [only after my complaint to the ombudsman and my warning that if he will refuse to comment on cystoscopy, I should address to him through a lawyer or other mediator] I managed to achieve an audience with Dr. Morris.


I forced him to comment on one of the lines in his cystoscopy's report from March 29, 2016: "obstructing from veru" [the outlet obstruction, as I guessed]. He said that it means the uterus swelling or calcifying "from "veru", with the narrowing of the pass for liquids evacuation from the bladder and that the surgical procedure is necessary. And this said the same doctor, who all these years denied hyperplasia (about which I dinned him into the ears, demanding the alpha blockers' tablets reducing the hyperplasia), and, when once I brought him lots of ultrasounds' copies with the diagnoses "hyperplasia", he literally got furious, began to shout that an ultrasound cannot determine even an approximate size, and so fiercely crossed out (by pen) the indicators in the copies of medical documents that tore the paper.


Here arise a number of medical, ethical, and legal issues.


If, by Dr. Morris's own words, "the surgical procedure is needed" - then why he told nothing about it during and after cystoscopy, or - at least - before the operation appointed to May 16, 2016?


From March 29, 2016 (date of cystoscopy) to May 16, 2016: there was enough time to report about it (to me), and to inform me of the need of the second operation. As far as I know, a cysto-litholopaxy operation is incompatible with a simultaneous additional surgical procedure. But what if I had an incorrect information, and it was possible to perform both operations at once, preventing further degradation of patient's health, new sufferings, psychological injuries, and all the rest? If it was possible - then why Dr. Morris did not even think of combination of 2 surgical procedures? (However, I doubt about such an option; and, still, by concealing the need of the 2-nd (next) surgery, Dr. Morris did a lot of harm).


Instead of appreciation for the fact that I did not complain to the Collège de Médecines or did not turn to a medical lawyer, he attacked me almost with his fists, starting shouting that - because I cancelled the operation appointed to May 16, 2016, - he was forced to pay a fine of 500 dollars (I do not trust him), and the operation cancellation did supposedly cost for the government 10 thousand dollars. Dr. Morris behaved as pathological liar, because he knew very good that - formally and actually - HE cancelled the surgery himself.


This time his statement about its own losses sounded much more modestly (last time, when he vomited the same charges, he called a much larger sum with 3 zero). Already only for this reason (not only because he lied a set of times in the past) - it is impossible to trust him. Besides, because he cancelled the operation himself, it turns out, that he punished himself financially.


Accusing me of the cancellation of operation, which he - technically - cancelled himself: this demands very rigid epithets.


When, in June, I talked to one doctor, retelling the accusations, which used Dr. Morris for blaming me, this doctor told that the surgery's cancellation - especially 2 weeks in advance - did not cause any damages (in spite of Dr. Morris's claims, which he already employed by then, accusing me and having illegally thrown me out from among his patients).


There are such enormous waiting lists for any planned (not urgent) operation in Quebec that the operating rooms are never empty, and any hospital immediately puts the turn for this time for other patient. Besides, I discussed a delay or cancellation of the operation (and, I repeat, not I cancelled it) on legal bases, without having violated any conditions for such cancellation (provided by rules). And, besides, it is not the first time, when Dr. Morris attacks me for, allegedly, malicious squandering of the state resources. His obsessive fury against me, under a deceptive "excuse" of "Canadian patriotism" reminds the fury of Hitlerite scumbags, who camouflaged their personal sadism and war crimes by far-fetched pretensions.


In 2013-2015 he spitefully attacked me for, allegedly, "too frequent" blood-urine tests, claiming that - supposedly - each analysis costs 500-1000 dollars for public medical care, and more. It is easy to notice that he uses always the same some lump sums (500, 1000, 10000), and it speaks for itself.


But - not this time, and, in addition, he even threatened me.


He told that - because of me, the state, allegedly, lost a large sum, having again added (as he claimed already once) that - because of my "statements" (it seems to me that last time he used the word of "literary trash") - whether he, whether his family: lost thousands of dollars, and he continued: "And who paid for it? Did you pay? No? "Someone" paid".


His tone and a hint assumed that I will pay dearly for it constituted a direct death threat. (What sounded in the form of undisguised threat).


Firstly, it is literally a tracing-paper from the shouts of an immigration official "from medicine", who caught me on the stairs in MCI Hospital (2000) and attacked me nearly with fists, reducing the whole affair with the counterfeit "tubercular" fluorography (and an attempt - on the basis of this forgery - to put me "on treatment" to infectious diseases unit) to my "unwillingness" to pay for treatment. That moral freak, as well as Dr. Morris, reduced everything to a monetary question - as though I was escaping a compulsory "treatment" "for tuberculosis" not because was afraid for my life, unwilling to submit to the scum of the criminal gang of medical gangsters, but evaded from a monetary contribution to Canadian state (which sheltered me).


The counterfeited fluorography was announced later "lost" ("missing"), and fat dots were put at the end of this affair...


Like that Immigration-affiliated doctor, who was able - skillfully - to use such a lexicon and such phraseological and phonetic constructions, that, being a pseudo-slang, would be perceived as a slang, and - at the same time - would be clearly understandable to such recent immigrant as I was in 2000, Dr. Morris, in turn, was now using the same lexicon, same phraseological and phonetic structures - as if it was Dr. Morris himself in 2000. By the way, Dr. Morris could look in 2000 like that Immigration hangman doctor: same height, same figure, same heirs. And, as I already noticed, first, his words were a tracing-paper of Immigration officers' threats and accusations, and more - on my memory - ANY other doctor (except that doctor in the Montreal Chest Institute (MCI) ever referred to monetary questions.


And, by the way, during our immigration case's hearings in the Federal and Supreme Court, the judge (as well as Immigration's representatives) once proclaimed a formulation that, allegedly, if the authorities of one Middle Eastern "pseudo-state" transported us to their country (against our will) for their own cost, now we "belong" to them for life. By such a perverse "logic", every kidnapper can become slaves master just "because" he transported the captivated people for his own cost. The same "logic" was exploited by Dr. Morris for justifying his crimes: he was throwing a switch to illegal and deceptive monetary questions in the same way a slave master, who counts the material damage causing by blood of his victims gushing from their wounds, but ignores the damage, which he (she) inflicted by enslaving, killing, or injuring his (her) victims.


Secondly, threatening me that I should "pay" for his alleged personal financial losses (allegedly, because "cancelled" by me operation: though he cancelled it) and financial losses of the state, he perfectly knew that I am an unemployed man - and that there is nothing that can be taken from me. Not otherwise, he meant that I will pay with my health or even with my life.


But even that is not the end, because an additional layer of sense was hidden in his tone and his words. Something outside of the medical sphere, something absolutely different...


So, my fear and depression caused by him, and even my actions, which terminated in cancellation of operation by Dr. Morris in May: were not irrational.... Each mere mortal (not a doctor and not a high-ranking official who has an understanding in such affairs) would be afraid to be operated at such person...


Whether it is accidental that in the next days - literally since December 14, 2016, - the police surveillance has intensified again, and occurred new events, which are keeping within the event-trigger row of the previous sequences of political repressions?


On Sunday, December 18, 2016, I wrote down in the chronicle of events:

that I "on Thursday, December 15, went for one medical procedure. On our way there, the police car 18-8 was standing in a key point.

We went around, on a road that goes like an arch on boondocks.

And just on our departure from this (known to very few people) road the police also waited for us".


It was my visit to LaSalle Hospital for another ultrasound test, where my wife brought me by car. When I came home, all wires from the modem and the digital phone were switched and connected not to their usual slots (not like before our exit). Whether it accidentally occurred right after the visit to Dr. Morris? Or - when another time I returned from another hospital (was absent 2 hours) - the external hard drive (which I switched-off and hid before leaving): was hot.


On December 13, 2016, when I came back home after the audience with Dr. Morris, I found out that the dermatological scalpel and the east surgical bone and wooden sticks were gone. They always were kept in the bedroom, in sight, but disappeared completely, forever...


Dr. Morris only partially explained the cystoscopy's conclusions, having jumped on furious accusations and interrupting our conversation.


At the same time - he is absolutely indifferent towards the fact that he breaks already not only medical ethics: it is not only shocking, but represents the biggest riddles in this case.


Not less mysterious are considerable divergences and even mutually exclusive conclusions in the reports of different exams: presence of bladder stones or their total absence; their sizes; their number; their localization; their type; etc. CT-scan (8-3-2016) contradicted the ultrasound scan (3-2-2016); cystoscopy contradicted both of these scans; next ultrasound report refuted all previous conclusions, and so on...


After Dr. Morris, I talked (non-officially) to 2 other urologists, who told that such a contradiction between different medical scans and exams is impossible in principle.


Then I got also an advice online, and was also told that it is impossible and represents no scientific or medical explanation. In that case, the explanation lies outside of the medical sphere...


It must be also taken into consideration that - being sponsored by the admirers of my musical and literary works in Europe - I passed several payable "private" ultrasound tests in very expensive ultrasound laboratories, where very professional technicians and radiologists work.


Slightly running forward and summing up the results; now I hold in my hands several reports of medical exams contradicting each other:

1) the abdominal-pelvic ultrasound (3 ("5") February, 2016) did not find any stones, which was impossible if they already were in the bladder by then (especially that I was fasting 2 days, and that I was (by then) a very skinny person), particularly, considering the sizes of the stones shown in a month by other exams (around 1.50 cm);

2) the computer tomography (8 March, 2016), which "saw" a "set" of bladder stones, but did not consider neither their number (quantity) and composition, nor their arrangement in the bladder (the biggest was measured as 1.40 cm);

3) the oral statement of Dr. Morris during cystoscopy's procedure (29 March, 2016): 4 stones slightly less than 1 cm;

4) the official report of cystoscopy (now received from the medical archive), which mentioned 4 stones, too, but without specifying their approximate size (even if cystoscopy does not reveal the exact sizes of uric stones up to a millimeter, still, it MUST estimate their approximate sizes), location, and composition;

5) last "control" abdominal-pelvic ultrasound (14 April, 2016): 4 stones, each around 1 cm.

6) an alternative ultrasound (27 April, 2016), which mentioned 3 stones - 2 near 1 centimeter, and 1 - 2.2 cm;

7) another alternative ultrasound (26 May, 2016) mentioned only 2 floating mobile stones;

8) an additional alternative ultrasound (15 June, 2016), which mentioned about a motionless cluster from 4 stones on the right side of the bladder by sizes of 14, 13, 10 and 9 mm;


Running further forward in time: the surgery operation of litholopaxy revealed 3 uric stones (the biggest of which was 24 mm), but not 4 stones.


Such serious divergences cannot be a mere consequence of objective factors.


Besides, the computer tomography obviously underestimated the sizes of stones: it was done - probably - "to justify" that ultrasound (3 February (actual date) ("5" February (a fake date in the papers), 2016), which did not find any bladder calculi. The same can be told about the cystoscopy: in his oral statement, Dr. Morris deliberately underestimated uric stones' sizes, and in his written report he did not mentioned bladder stones' sizes at all.


I consulted non-officially with 2 urologists, and 3 urologists advised me online, claimed that such inexplicable differences between different medical imaging scans do not correspond to any scientific and medical practice. I talked to several more knowing doctors, including one Polish female radiologist, and none of them could realize - how a bit more sensitive and precise in relation to bladder computer 8-3-2016 tomography (only kidneys are equally observable by tomography and ultrasound) appeared to be incomparably less exact than 27-4-2016 ultrasonography.


The fact that the ultrasound showed 3 stones - can be explained with the fact that 2 stones were taken for one, but then it turns out that all of them practically do not exceed 1 cm that contradicts the computerized tomography since a divergence in 30-40 mm: this is a very serious difference.


But, if we revoke (again) the "opposite" suggestion, repeating the "fantastic" hypothesis that the uric stones were injected during cystoscopy, or otherwise "created" in the bladder, then the fact that all 4 stones (according to coinciding characteristic of the oral statement of Dr. Morris and the last "control" ultrasound) were in March-April exactly 1 cm: this already in itself hints at their artificial origin.


On symptomatology the same turns out.


No symptoms were traced before cystoscopy.


I managed to get a special symptomatology table of differentiation of bladder stones symptoms from other UP pathologies symptoms (this list goes back to those centuries, when there was no electronic and radiological equipment around, and the diagnosis was made purely on symptomatology of diseases).


I carefully analyzed and methodically considered everything that saw in this table, and came to a conclusion that no special symptoms of bladder stones were observed before cystoscopy.


The same is shown also by the analyses.


Leukocytes used to jump during the periods of an acute infection, that's true, but both proteins, and other elements indicating an infection also raised above the norm, and, plus, some of the microbiology culture tests (done on requisitions of non-Montreal doctors, or outside Montreal, and, therefore, not sabotaged and not disappeared) used to detect enterococci, thus, explaining abnormally high leukocytes, proteins, and other criterions of infection.


However, even all aforesaid: is still a very superficial assessment of conspiracy and criminal activity of some certain group of health workers.


CHAPTER 4. Pre-operational tests - March-May 2016.


Deeper analysis elicits even more ominous facts (based on the pre-operative diagnostic tests):


1. CYSTOSCOPY - March 29, 2016.

* The date of the cystoscopy procedure is not specified. Only the year (2016) was indicated, but the month and day are missing. (see the document).

* Only hematuria is mentioned, and other most important symptoms are absent.

* The names of the assistants are not specified. There were 2 doctors-assistants: one was a male urologist with a Polish family name (a male with a beard), and the second one was an anesthesiologist (a shorter male). The presence of an anesthesiologist is raising questions, too.

* Anaesthetic agent is not specified (a very serious violation!).

* The phrase "He was booked for cystoscopy": is raising questions.

* A phrase "ultrasound showed bladder calculi" - is a blatant lie. Not an ultrasound, but a computer tomography (allegedly) found bladder stones. It seems that this false reference to "ultrasound" (instead of CT-scan) was deliberately entered to justify the unnecessary procedure of cystoscopy: invasive, aggressive, and contraindicated at that time.

* The phrase "abdomen negative" is lacking the commentaries, or has no sense.

* The uterus size is deceptively underestimated. (Compare with the imaged of ultrasounds and other tests).

* "Nocturia x 2 with a good stream" purposely misleads. Everything was on the contrary. Just before cystoscopy, in my faxes to Dr. Morris, I complained of nocturia x 9-11, and also complained about the problem of bladder emptying.

* Condition of patient: "good" - is also a lie.

* When I arrived to the procedure, I asked to replace a package of the distilled liquid by a new one. It is surprising that they agreed to do it rather easily. The young assistant with a small beard immediately attached a tube to an old package, and then to the new one. However, during the procedure, he connected "my" end of the tube not to a new package, but to the old package. Why?

* The phrase "There are 4 calculi in the bladder" is entered into a wrong column line "Bladder mucousa", instead of the column "Stones". The formulary's line "Stones" is empty, which is a very sinister, frightening, hinting surreal symbol. No place of the uric stones in the bladder is indicated; their approximate sizes and structure are not specified.


2. ELECTROCARDIOGRAM - May 3, 2016.

* "Sinus rhythm: Abnormal R-wave progression, early transition" can indicate a possible serious disease or a temporary heart problem. In combination with my complaints to pain behind the sternum and at the thoracic cardiac branches at that time, episodes of quickened and short breath, tachycardia, and instant sudden extreme fatigue, the result of the cardiogram had to cause serious concerns.

*By then, yet without knowing about the cardiogram result, I asked (in my fax to Dr. Morris) to postpone the litholopaxy operation because of an acute infection (Enterococci + symptoms), heart problems, and the general state since I was extremely weakened by a series of infections.

* But - before asking Dr. Morris to delay the litholopaxy operation - I demanded an access to cystoscopy's report, pointing that - otherwise - I will not be fitting psychologically for the surgery. Dr. Morris's direct duty and his ethical obligation was to allow me to see the cystoscopy report, but he refused to satisfy my demand, and blocked me an access to cystoscopy's report.

* Instead of responsibly treating my justified explanations, worries, and concerns, Dr. Morris ignored them, cancelled the operation, and told me to come and to pick up my medical history chart since I was thrown out from among Dr. Morris's patients.

* I describe separately - how I arrived to pick up the medical history file, and how Dr. Morris deceived me, having torn off from me 50 dollars, and, instead of the real medical chart documents, gave me something completely different, having enclosed trash papers' copies in an envelope.

* Heart problems appeared as a direct response to Dr. Morris's maltreatment, so, he is directly responsible for the problem, revealed by the cardiogram result.


3. BLOOD TEST - May 3, 2016.

* Low Hematocrit, Hemoglobin and Erythrocytes. Low MPV VPM (the boundary indicator). In case of bleeding in the course or after a surgery operation, it could provoke unpredictable consequences. Monocytosis is a symptom of a heavy acute and / or chronic infection and autoimmune dangerous response, and it had to strengthen the concern. During long and dangerous infections long keeping monocytosis can develop into leukemia, i.e. fatal blood disease.

* The blood test's results prompted some elements not compatible with the litholopaxy operation, which had to be delayed. Dr. Morris perfectly realized that such surgery is impossible in the present moment, because could cause a fatal bleeding, heart or kidney failure, etc. Unfavorable for litholopaxy operation blood formula, abnormal cardiogram (first in patient's life!), and other factors made the surgery too risky. Preparation for the surgery should include hospitalization and pre-operative treatment in the hospital, but Dr. Morris did not want to allow this, worrying that his medical crimes can be exposed. In addition, the acute infection, provoked by cystoscopy, was still on its peak, increasing the risk and litholopaxy operation's undesirable outcomes.

* So, Dr. Morris just canceled the litholopaxy operation, shifting the blame in me. His motives are very transparent: his patient has warned by faxes about the above-mentioned obvious risks, blaming Dr. Morris that he driven the patient to such condition, and now, if something would go wrong during or right after the operation, it would become a classic criminal case.

* However, if not my pre-operative faxes, Dr. Morris was ready to go ahead with the surgery - and to kill his patient. He knew about the imminent risks, but disregarded everything. Just on the contrary, he was furious that his victim got away.


4. URINE TEST.

* "Ascorbic acid detected. It interferes with the chemical analysis. (...)??) Avoid vitamin C supplements for 2 days". I do not take and never took ascorbic acid (Vitamin C) in any form, and never bought vitamin C supplements. I am absolutely sure that I did not have Vitamin C or its supplements in my food, because I eat only fresh fruits and vegetables. The same trick (the same pretext) was used many times by St.-Mary Hospital's laboratory (and by other laboratories) for sabotage of urinalysis microbiology culture. As I accused Dr. Morris in provoking the infection by unnecessary cystoscopy, the hospital had to white-wash its leading urologist. That's why they did everything possible for destroying the result of the infection's detection, in addition, also for concealing the contraindications to the operation. And, because the microbiology culture test was sabotaged, all other indexes also were falsified and brought artificially (by altering and editing the original) to normal. If we compare this forged test with ALL previous and ALL following urine tests (end of 2015 - 2016), we will find no one with ALL so perfectly normal indexes. We can guess that the modification and falsification of this urine test's data was done not in the laboratory, but on the computer network level.


See the images below.


Blood-urine test (May 3, 2016). The message about the ascorbic acid is untrue. In this chronicle, innumerous examples of medics' criminal lie may convince anyone that forgery, deception, falsification, and lie are employed by the medical community on everyday basis. However, we should not blame doctors and other medics for this sinister custom, but medical bureaucrats, governmental circles, and secret services for submitting medics to their oppressive crimes against humanity. The lie about the ascorbic acid was used as an excuse for this analysis' sabotage. This trick was used by the laboratories already multiple times. Actually, I never took the ascorbic acid. I repeat: it is a complete nonsense. And, secondly, if the analysis did not turn out: why they did not repeat it then?!!


One of the extremely interesting details: in all these analyses' printouts, my medical electronic card (Quebec RAMQ card governmental medical insurance) is specified as expired in 2015. First, with an overdue medical card, I would not be able to pass any analyses or exams; I would not be accepted in any medical institutions; and, secondly, the fact that the period of my card's validity expired in 2015, is untrue.


There are 3 conclusions - by default:

1) The hypothesis that the bladder stones could not exist PRIOR TO cystoscopy - should be upheld.

2) The suspicion that the bladder stones (in mid-May, 2016), perhaps, were not formed yet (of a certain pulp?), also remains in force.

(In mid-May (13-5-2016), I received a repeated (14-days) additional course of antibiotics, and - on the 3-rd or 5-th day - ALL symptoms disappeared, and here, this asymptomatic stuck to the whole 12 days, and, in case of the bladder stones, and, especially, the infected uric stones: such thing (as I was told by 2 online urologists-consultants) - does not happen).

3) Instead of preparing me for a safe litholopaxy operation, having stabilized my hematologic indicators by day of operation, having verified the sustainability the heart function, and having appointed an essential course of antibiotics, I was doomed (by Dr. Morris) for operation with catastrophic consequences.


Besides the 3 above-mentioned conclusions, there are many other questions.


Whether accidentally Dr. Segal was charged to conduct my preoperative exams? (The fact that he appeared to be - apparently - an honest and decent person: it's another story. But the fact that HE was chosen, and not someone else, speaks by itself; it is easier to keep a person with such a family name a tight rein: he personally said to me, concerning the preoperative exams that all my analyses and cardiogram - are "fine". Was it true? It is possible to judge about it by looking over the printouts of the lab tests and cardiogram results.


I don't challenge Dr. Segal's statement about the tests and the cardiogram, but 4 other doctors had a different opinion. And it is possible that their opinion was more careful for a very simple reason: they had no conflict of interests, and they were not under pressure.


Concerning the delay (not cancellation!) of operation: I called and sent faxes not only to Dr. Morris, but also called the preoperative office, and spoke by phone with the secretary, the nurse, and some doctor (not doctor Segal), and all 3 of them said to me that all the analyses are "fine", and that the cardiogram is "like a cardiogram of 30 y.o. athlete", and that there is no reason, "judging by exams", to postpone the operation.


Besides, said to all 3 of them, "without Dr. Morris" neither to cancel, nor to delay the operation is not impossible! As though Dr. Morris was a tsar, a sun, and a god, and as though all rules and laws, and both medical norms and contraindications do not work without the consent of Dr. Morris! But, if the fundamental principles of medical legality and universal humanitarian norms have no universal character in Canada - then what can we speak (in general) about?


On the same day, May 6, 2016, I called the preoperative office of the St. Mary's Hospital again, and again asked to call somebody, who can speak with me about the delay of the operation. When another person took the call, I explained that, before giving my final consent for the operation, I need to know the results of cystoscopy, preoperative analyses, and cardiogram. Without obtaining these results, I will transfer or cancel the operation, because I surely have to know these results BEFORE the operation.


The secretary, the nurse, and the doctor - all 3 - told me that they cannot grant to me an access to these results. When I asked, why, the secretary and the doctor gave the same response: as they said, I am "not authorized" to see the medical documents. When I contested that, arguing that, by Canadian, Quebec, and International laws, a patient cannot be deprived of the access to medical information, especially, to patient's personal exams and analyses: there was no reply. Then the secretary added that I can address to the medical archive, but, she said, only hospital's direct patients are granted an access to documents, not patients like me. I called - repeatedly - few more times, speaking with the secretary and with the doctor, demanding an access to my tests and exams, emphasizing that, if they closed me an access to medical documents, then it mean that they have what to hide, but they repeatedly denied me that access.


If so, I told them, I want to cancel the operation, because I cannot trust doctors and hospitals, which built secrecy around my personal data.


At that time, the doctor and the secretary of the preoperative office were standing side by side, and continued the conversation with me together. They replied to my intention to cancel the surgery - if the access to my tests and exams will not be open to me - by an invitation to come to the hospital - and to talk to social worker or to psychologist, but I said that I need neither that, nor this, but I just want to cancel operation. I added that I already sent a fax with the same demand (to open the access to my medical data, or to cancel the operation) on May 4, 2016, because I do not want to be reproached that I cancelled an operation "at the last moment".


Reacting to my words, they stated that, anyway, the operation cannot be cancelled without coordination with Dr. Morris, and that I have to talk (about it) - to Lucie, or "with the doctor", but there is neither that, nor that today. I suggested that they meant Dr. Segal, who did not work today, or already left, or was too busy.


These negotiations highlighted the process of the recruitment of wider circles of citizens into regime's cruel, oppressive, and inhuman activities. For all 3 workers of this preoperative office, cruel oppressive methods (like deprivation of basic human rights and oppressive referral of human rights' defenders to a "social worker or psychologist") undergo trivialization.


This was the last working day of the week (May 6, 2016, Friday), and - on the weekend - Dr. Morris (clearly), does not work; so, I could call his office only on Monday, May 9, 2016.


CHAPTER 4. 8 May 2016.


May 8, 2016, Sunday.

On May 8, 2016, at 22:50, I sent a new fax to Dr. Morris's office, the following content:


Fax to Dr. Morris; May 8, 2016.


To: Dr. Brian Morris -

5025 Sherbrook Ouest, Suite 455,

Westmount, Quebec, H4A 1S9

Tel.: (514) 485-1333 Fax.: (514) 485-8509


[from Lev (Leon) Gunin, Tel., email; May 8, 2016]


Dear Dr. Morris!


I apologize for all embarrassments and inconveniencies for you personally and for the medical system for my decision, but I think that the best solution in the present situation is to postpone or cancel the surgery, scheduled for May 16, 2016.


If my decision is medically wrong, it is not simply my error, but a consequence of the mismanagement of my health problems in the medical institutions and a series of weird events.


I could review and probably reverse my decision based on 29 Mar. 2016 cystoscopy result + blood + urine tests (3 May 2016), but - on the 5-6th of May, 2016, - you refused me a copy of cystoscopy. I was also referred by the hospital to the Medical Archive to obtain my blood + urine reports, which I would potentially get too late (after the surgery).


My statement about my request to delay or cancel the surgery is not an evidence of a violation of my commitment to follow my consent for the procedure and administrative-organizational order, but rather dictated by the changes in my health situation, like serious post-cystoscopy infection, its mismanagement, and complications. I am presently weakened by month-long serious illness and its impact; physically and psychologically shaken by the misfortunate events.


First, I have to recover before an eventual surgery, and also get rid of the infection before going to the procedure. I am presently on Cipro until Tuesday, May 10, 2016, and a reliable urine test (to rule out an acute infection) can be done not sooner than a week later. To my knowledge, an infection is a contraindication for the cysto-litholopaxy.


Without any reliable documented information on the risk factors, I cannot rule out that the risks of post-cysto-litholopaxy complications" devastative consequences (regarding my presently poor condition and a possibility of still not cured infection"s outbreak) may be greater than the risks of the surgery"s delay. Here is my explanation and justification for my decision:


1) March 3, 2016, I came to your office with a gross hematuria-hematochezia. I suggested a scenario of a joint prostatitis, cystitis, proctitis, and a prostatic abscess. I have no doubt that the bladder stones played no role in this serious illness recurrence. Instead of accepting my requests for urine (+culture) and blood tests, antibiotics, swab test, and an urgent imaging (trasrectal, abdominal ultrasound, etc.), you only administrated a CT-scan, scheduled for March, 8, 2016, and insisted on cystoscopy, which I declined (considering an infection).


2) As soon as I declined the cystoscopy, and warned you in my 2 messages about the devastative cystoscopy"s complications that could be highly predictable (and - contradictory to cystoscopy - symptoms of an ongoing urinal infection), a CT-scan"s result, expected around March 31, 2016, suddenly arrived on March 18, 2016. "Multiple stones" were found in the bladder, with the biggest around 1.4 cm.


3) The stones in the bladder are not a primary condition, but a complication of innumerous urological infections, because I followed all available recommendations for the general public to prevent the stasis. I believe that at that point, it was more urgent to detect and fight the infection, administrating proper antibiotics, before arranging a quick cystoscopy and stone-removal surgery. Moreover, the CT-scan reported that an infection (cystitis) could not be excluded. However, you rejected my repeated request for antibiotics and for a urine test + culture on March 18, 2016.


4) Since March 1, 2016, I have experienced lower back pain that radiates toward the lower abdominal area. On March 19 and 20, 2016, these symptoms worsened. I was suffering from considerable pain, and was feeling unwell, and was also worried by the possibility of passing the cystoscopy with an ongoing urinary infection. On March 20, 2016, I went to Verdun hospital's emergency, and explained that I had cystitis and other symptoms. A male nurse gave me a jar and a test tube to collect urine samples. However, I noticed that the tube test had no ID slip on it. Coming back with the sample, I asked the same nurse why my name and ID were only on the jar and not on the tube - how would they be able to identify MY sample without attaching my ID? He ordered me to hand him over the sample and leave for the waiting room, or else, he said, he would call security. Obviously, if the jar was destined for a regular urine test and the tube test was to be sent for a microbiology culture to trace bacteria, the absence of my ID on the tube test would prevent any findings of bacteria involved.


5) When, in April 2016, 2 medical doctors looked into the record of my visit to Verdun hospital emergency through Dossier Quebec, the microbiology-culture was missing. However, when I later obtained same records from the hospital"s archive, I found a page of the culture with a negative result. Obviously, it was added in the end of April. At the same time, there is no record from the triage in my file, and, consequently, no name of the male nurse or intern, who so openly and maliciously refused to provide an ID for my microbiology-culture test.


6) I received no help, no antibiotics, no requested tests, because, I was told that I "should not come to this hospital", as I "have a urologist", and "must address with my problems to him".


7) After the cystoscopy, March 29 - 31 (2016), I had hematochezia-hematuria bleedings. At first, there was bloody urine; then bloody clots; and later very huge drops of blood after passing ur. On April 1, 2016, I, finally, experienced some relief and improvement. However, at night, I had severe pain, with both my urinary and bowel tracts burning and itching. On Saturday morning, April 2, 2016, there was some improvement again, followed by intense itching and burning. Then, instantly, I experienced wild pain in the bladder, trouble passing urine, and a bloody discharge. Not risking waiting hours in Emergency while the infection destroys my bladder and uterus, I took Cipro (pills left from the last time I had had antibiotics). I also stopped taking Flomax. On Monday, April 3, 2016, I experienced new problems. Almost every urge to pass urine led to a simultaneous spontaneous bowel movement. The flow immediately worsened. Pain, irritation or proctitis followed. I experienced pain on the bladder's right side after the previous day's bloody discharge. I also had an infection that looked like a scar on the inside of my mouth, located on the inside surface of the upper lip. On April, 6, 2016, I had no more Cipro around.


8) On Thursday, April 7, 2016, my state rapidly worsened. In the afternoon, I got chills, fever, extreme fatigue, shortness of breath, colorectal-urinary burning, itching, and bleeding, and symptomatic prostatic abscess. Then I experienced an almost a complete inability to pass urine, extremely painful urination, confusion, disorientation, back pain, and rectal burning. Gradually, over the next 6 hours, I felt extreme and increasing pain when passing urine. Around 15:50, I went the new Royal Victoria Hospital"s emergency room. However, my urine sample was, allegedly, "confused" with "another patient"s sample", and the [detected] bacterium was proclaimed "not mine", and was not "disclosed" to me. I only received Cipro prescription - for 2 weeks only. I was refused requested tests and treatment, and was sent home with almost half of the hematological components abnormal, and 19 thousand leucocytes. I was told that I should not come to this hospital and that I had to turn to my urologist, Dr. Morris, and "follow with him".


9) Considering an officially recognized loss of my urine microbiology test (March 2, 2015) in St.-Mary"s lab, and other similar incidents, the disappearance of my tests and samples, or authentically doubtful results became a pattern.


10) Having a very serious post-cystoscopy infection, in the morning on 31 Mar. 2016, I left you a message, and - in the beginning of following week - spoke to your secretary, and then sent you a fax with an appeal for help, but you never responded to my plea. It is possible that the consequences could be prevented if I was offered an urgent visit to your office.


11) As I understood from your explication that, besides identifying the calculi, the cystoscopy had provided no other significant findings. Indeed, this test had previously proved to be useless as a diagnostic tool in my case, and even caused serious damage years ago with no benefits. My warnings also appeared to be very well grounded. (Could a cystoscopy, performed 1-3 years ago, prevent stones formation by detecting this process on a very early stage? First, according to 6 or 7 ultrasound reports, there were no stones in the bladder in past years, and secondly, I could be sent for a non-invasive CT-scan years ago, considering hematuria and my complains about the difficulty sometimes of passing urine.)


12) On April 20, 2016, I finished a 2-week course of antibiotics, but - on April 22, 2016, the infection came back. I got same symptoms and problems as before.


13) On April 25, 2016, I did a urine test + culture in a private laboratory outside of Montreal. This test came out positive for infection and for bacteria organism: Enterococcus Faecalis. In total, there were 3 urine tests outside of Montreal, or administrated by a doctor, who practices outside of Montreal. Among dozens of urinalyses (and cultures) only 3 were positive from 2001 to 2016, and all 3 were related to doctors or labs outside of Montreal. One may wonder how this fact may correspond to the theory of relativity, which nobody called off yet.


14) Since April 26, 2016, I am on Cipro again, until May 10, 2016 (2 weeks).


15) It is possible that my suffering from the post-cystoscopy infection could have been avoided if a preventive course of antibiotics or a special single doze was administrated prior to the procedure (before March 29, 2016). The same applies to the scheduled cystoscopic laser stone removal surgery, because prior to this surgery I was not offered medications that could prevent or soften an expected post-cysto-litholopaxy infection.


16) All these traumatic events have caused a serious damage to my health. Even my face was destroyed, bearing now 10 more years of the aging marks, and I have 3 times more gray hair then before this March. This change in my look is just another proof of the grave impact of the unfortunate collisions. Now, I believe, my motivation for requesting to delay or cancel the surgery is adequately explained.


Besides, in the last 3 days, I had a chest pain.


And, finally, there is also an issue of the conflicting tests" results that makes an additional confusion.


On February 3, 2016, I had an abdominal ultrasound that found no stones in my bladder. This test was very professionally interpreted and very carefully performed. Besides, I am skinny, and was even skinnier in February, which is a factor that increases the precision. Even if the CT-scan is superior in sensitivity and precision, still, the ultrasound had to find, at least, the presence of stones.


Then, after cystoscopy, you told me about considerably smaller stones then the CT-scan reported.


And, in conclusion, I was denied a copy of the cystoscopy result. There are several other contradicting facts that increase my confusion.


All above mentioned facts and events leave a trail of uncertainty and ambiguity, which is a shadow of insecurity and scariness. And it is a very scary perspective to be left without post-surgery medical observation and follow ups (as it happened after cystoscopy).


This concludes my statement.

My best regards,

Lev Gunin, Montreal, May 8, 2016.


................


Maybe, in response to my explanation, Dr. Morris opened (for me) the access to cystoscopy' report; promised a pre-surgical course of antibiotics; or carried out additional exams to re-evaluate risks of the future operation, represents my state (whether all as it should be with heart and whether hematologic indicators are normal now)?


No!


He simply cancelled - in return - the operation (through his secretary: because did not want to communicate with me directly any more); struck me off the list of his patients (that - under the Canadian laws: is a criminal act); and also refused to refer me to another urologist, who could perform the operation as a surgeon, instead of him (which is a criminal act).


All these Dr. Morris's actions already violated not only the medical ethics, but also human norms and even general laws, but he was absolutely sure of his full impunity.


May 9, 2016, Monday.

On May 9, 2016, I called the preoperative bureau (of St. Mary's Hospital) again - at 10:16 and 10:32 in the morning, but the phone did not answer, and I left (twice!) my message for "Lucie" on the answering machine of the following contents:


1) I would like to discuss a possibility of operation's date's change; in case I do not get access to medical information demanded by me;


2) I already sent a fax to this bureau on May 4, 2016, but covered the problems around this operation in more details and more precisely in my fax to Dr. Morris, and I authorize him to sound the questions stated in that fax.


As I found out later, this certain "Lucie" was, most likely, madam Lucie (Lucy) Opartny, the chef administrator of St.-Mary's hospital, who, possibly, was the most active participant of the human rights violations, according to indirect evidence. I had several personal negative collisions with madam Lucy Opartny; however, my personal impression and information about her may be wrong, and I don't want to spread wrongful allegations about her. Still, judging by her leadership and her management of the hospital, the major shift towards inhuman practices, dictatorial style of administration, and the most despiteful violations of patients' rights began particularly under her governance.


At 13:22, I, at last, I could reach (by phone) madam Lucie, to whom retold orally all my demands and my desire to postpone the surgical operation if my demands are not met.


At 14:42, I phoned Dr. Morris's office, and talked to his secretary.


At once, I told that the litholopaxy operation cannot take place on May 16, 2016, if I a) do not get access to the cystoscopy's report; b) to results of the preoperative analyses and cardiogram; c) to Cipro (antibiotics) 1000 mg XL, for 4-weeks treatment; d) and if I do not have a guarantee of the immediate - urgent - medical help if something goes wrong after the surgery. It is very important, I stressed, that I will not be left to the mercy of fate, in case of serious complications after the operation and need of an urgent medical care.


And I reminded that - after March 29, 2016 cystoscopy - when I was suffering from extremely serious life-threatening complications and acute urological infection, and was begging Dr. Morris for help (repeatedly calling by phone to his office, leaving messages, sending faxes with the entreaty about immediate help), all my addresses were ignored, and nobody reacted to my appeal: neither Dr. Morris, nor his 2 secretaries. When, with cold-hearted retardation, but, nevertheless, one of Dr. Morris's secretaries booked for me an urgent appointment with him, Dr. Morris cancelled this appointment and mercilessly refuse to see me.


Moreover, I said, whether at the initiative of Dr. Morris, whether on some corporate conspiracy of doctors, Verdun and Royal Victoria hospitals did not want to provide medical care in both emergency departments, insisting that I have to address for help EXCLUSIVELY to Dr. Morris; sabotaged the microbiology culture test; and treated me with unusual cruelty and inhuman approach.


I told that I must to obtain a guarantee that the same situation will not repeat itself after the surgical operation on May 16, 2016.


I told that I am not going to CANCEL the operation, but would like to DELAY it in order to see my demands fulfilled and my conditions implemented, and also would like to learn about the procedure of such a delay, because I still did not recover from cystoscopy's complications, having a serious condition, and being crashed physically and psychologically, experiencing heartaches, and, besides, I need an extension of the course of antibiotics, receiving an adequate dose and type of Cipro - 1000 mg of XL. Without the satisfaction of my demands the operation is impossible.


But the secretary of Dr. Morris began to talk to me - at this moment - by rigid and assertive tone, confusing me, provoking my almost inarticulate speech. The depression by that moment amplified so that this state was reflected even in my speech, and - after her trick of destroying my consecutive narration, I ceased to speak and answer adequately, and my fluent English speech turned into "b-b-b" and "m-m-m".


The secretary completely ignored the dependency of my final consent to operation at Dr. Morris on May 16, 2016, from an access at least to cystoscopy's report and course of correct antibiotics - telling that any delay of operation (for a new date) is impossible and that she can cancel it completely right now.


She also said that they want to get rid of such a patient as me, and that something that she is going to do now: she will cancel the operation, and will delete me from the list of Dr. Morris's patients.


When I stressed that she and her chef - they have a moral and legal obligation to transfer me, in that case, to another urologist, she did not disconnect, but just ignored my point. Such a reaction just confirmed a certitude that (no doubts!) the cancellation of the operation and the expulsion from the list of Dr. Morris's patients was in advance discussed with Dr. Morris.


The secretary also insisted that neither she, nor Dr. Morris - never ignored my calls and messages left on the answering machine, and my faxes, except for May 6, 2016, when she did not call back, but it, certainly, was a lie: because I kept copies of all faxes sent to Dr. Morris, both the list of all my calls and time of messages left of on the answering machine. And even concerning the most recent case, she was not sincere, because they not only refused to me call back on May 6, but also ignored my fax on May 8, 2016.


I wanted to add that I do not agree to such a scenario, and do not insist on categorical operation's cancellation, but she did not allow me to open my mouth. When I began to say that I agree to operation's cancellation only if they completely ignore my concerns and my demands, and do not want to have me a patient any more, but Dr. Morris's secretary suppressed my statements again, and, at this moment, disconnected. All my attempts to speak with her again have failed: she ignored my calls, and did not answer my calls.


Thus, the secretary used an illegal and shameful trick, artificially creating a situation of my alleged, falsified consent for surgery's cancellation, instead of its delay, and without the transfer to another urologist. This was just another outraged and illegitimate action in a row of similar amoral acts.


Soon after, on the same day, May 9, still hoping to receive - at least - the copy of the preliminary version of cystoscopy, I came to the office of Dr. Morris, who did not greet me about 3 months and did not answer my greetings. He even ceased to talk to me in general, communicating with me through his secretaries during mine calls to his office on May 5 and 6, 2016.


When Dr. Morris saw me, his face warped from rage, became red, and his hands instinctively clenched in fists.


When I asked him to give me a copy of the preliminary cystoscopy's report, he frowned, became literarily green, and clenched his fists even stronger.


As well as before cystoscopy, when he refused a preventive doze of antibiotics, he refused a preventive dose of antibiotics prior to laser lithotripsy as well, and it means that whole nightmare of a post-cystoscopy infection would inevitably repeat again, only on even more terrible scale, but what can be even more terrible?


Therefore, I did an attempt to bring up - once again - this subject, insisting on his definite and clear answer: WHY he refused to appoint a preoperative dose of preventive antibiotics BEFORE the laser lithotripsy.


Having heard my demands, he already just fell into rage.


All the time raising his voice, Dr. Morris began to cry out that it is not my business, and that doctors know that they do.


He said that he expelled me from among his patients, and that I should "look for another urologist".


Thus, the cancellation of operation at Dr. Morris became a reality, and - by no means - not by me, - as Dr. Morris claimed.


He - through the secretaries - cancelled the operation and deleted me from his patients list.


May 11, 2016 (Wednesday).

With temperature, pain and an ache in my whole body I stayed 3 hours in the waiting line in the public laboratory (in MG Hospital), in vain.


It turned out that my family doctor did not specify my surname and other data in his requisition, and I did not notice it because of the stress and the general dramatic situation.


The whole laboratory was shocked; they told that they can recall nothing similar in their memories. And, nevertheless, they boldly refused to call my doctor or to do an exception for me.


I went to the Metro, but my monthly metro pass-travel card did not let me to pass though was covered by the payment for a month. This was not the first time, when the authorities used such a trick to mock at me and to taunt me (other similar incidents are described in the preceded parts of this chronicle).


I went to call home from the payphone: 3 phones ate coins, but did not connect to home telephone line.


Isn't it because all electronics is connected and with cameras-spies and coordinated with surveillance, and already grounded for mockeries at the objectionable persons?


Now, I had to walk home several kilometers - filling a growing illness - in subconscious state, and, moreover, now the police stopped me on the road.

Here is when at least 5 dollars in the pocket would not be a grudge.

But the financial affairs are also worse and worse...


May 12, 2016 (Thursday).

I had to go - in such a serious condition - to my family doctor again, with the requisition: to ask the doctor and his secretary to entered missing information in the requisition...


May 13, 2016, Friday.

On April 23, 2016, I took the same requisition, went out of Montreal's borders, to a small town, and - for 60 dollars - passed the blood-urine tests (including microbiology culture) in a local branch of the big PRIVATE LABORATORY - and the bacterium was found! (see below)


Bacterium enterococci, found by the analysis in the private laboratory on April 23, 2016. (see above)


The same day, May 13, 2016, I went to the pharmacy, and received antibiotics - ciprofloxacin, - which - as a result - helped just because it was the CORRECT TYPE (XL), the CORRECT dose (1000 mg) appointed by non-Montreal urologist to the CORRECT term (14 days).


The ciprofloxacin on 1000 mg XL for 2 weeks received in drugstore on May 13, 2016.


One more curious detail: in the pharmacy, claiming that they do not have Cipro 1000 mg "at the present time", they gave me Cipro 500 mg. It was necessary to take 2 pill together at once (simultaneously), that, as people say, not the same. Not therefore this course helped only for 1 month?


The lack of real progress during former Cipro courses can be explained by the sabotage of my laboratory analyses and also by DELIBERATE appointment of obviously inefficient dose and duration of antibiotics though doctors were obliged to prescribe AT ONCE a course of treatment not for 1, but, at least - for 2, or, better, for 4 weeks, and not Cipro 500 mg, but 1000 mg; these doctors perfectly knew (by inefficiency of the previous courses) that in 2 weeks of intake of 500 mg tablets - they will not help! In addition, at each infection's recurrence, doctors resisted the prescription of antibiotics, and prescribed them 1-2 (or more) months after the beginning of an acute faze, or did not prescribe at all. The sufficiency of antibiotics, prescribed months after the infection broke out, is tending to "0" (zero)!


On top of all this, for many years, doctors used to prescribe not antibiotics like Cipro, effective against UT infections, but such "week" and specified for completely different infections antibiotics, which could not fight UT infections by definition.


If not systematic sabotage of my laboratory analyses: the whole nightmare with a problem of antibiotics' denial would not emerged, and I would not have "to beat out" antibiotics even after a triple recurrence of an acute UT infection during 1-2 months. We should consider as the acts of sabotage not only the cases of lost (missing) and (or) falsified-fabricated laboratory analyses' results in Montreal hospitals, but also systematic refusals to administrate microbiology culture tests during acute UT infections' outbreaks by Dr. Morris and by other doctors; with the aggravating circumstance in case of Dr. Morris, who refused to appoint the urgent medical required tests under the pretext of the "considerable cost" of laboratory analyses. Due to his sabotage, I had to address to other medical institutions and to other doctors. However, because of Dr. Morris's sabotage, the frequent time was missed, and the analysis could not reveal a bacterium (a contagium), as it was too late.


Because Dr. Morris's refusal of essential tests and medications, I had - in serious state, and in situations, when the remoteness from the next toilet became a real torture - to go to different remote hospitals and policlinics, or to address to emergency departments, waiting there for from 4-6 to 16 hours in extremely inconvenient and painful conditions, and quite often facing humiliating and mockery.


Thereby, Dr. Morris deliberately inflicted incalculable suffering, provoked a deep, hardest depression, and also irreversible damage to my health.


Detection of an infectious bacterium by ALL small private laboratories, or by the laboratories of suburban hospitals, or on requisitions of non-Montreal doctors (or doctors of alternative medical networks (such as independent policlinics or CLSC), by just FEW tests of this category - against dozens of times more numerous analyses in the central Montreal hospitals and in the directions of Montreal doctors, NONE of which NEVER clearly detected an infectious bacterium, or were just "missing" (the results were lost): proves that, first, my demands to Dr. Morris to administrate a laboratory analysis (what he systematically refused) were - for my part - COMPLETELY justified and reasonable, and, secondly - a systematic sabotage of the identification of the infectious stimulus (bacterial agent) was carried out in laboratories of the central Montreal hospitals.


When - due to remoteness from the office of my non-Montreal urologist (Dr. El-Hakim), and impossibility to phone there (and because of other reasons) - I addressed to a walk-in clinic, and was given the requisition for a laboratory analysis, this test (June 2, 2016; see below) now found the same bacterium. (It means that the Ciprofloxacin helped, but only for the term of less than 1 month. However, if not this - even temporary - effect, the infection could destroy my bodies, causing irreparable harm).


Dr. Morris caused me and my family huge (in our economic and social situation) financial damage, because of the additional expenses on transportation and other expenses, whereas we so hardly made ends meet...


CHAPTER 5. Since 15 May 2016.


May 15, 2016.

The come-back acute urological infection became now even a more painful task. Those days I wrote to one my close friend:


"3 days I was not able to open my e-mails - I was in such a hard state that I was incapable even of such a simplest operation.

For these days my drama only went deep.

Against the background of new deterioration, feeling completely broken, weakened and damaged, I asked (in writing) the urologist to postpone the operation until my recovery from the consequences of a new round of infection. Instead, without giving me a chance (at least a day) to change the mind, Dr. Morris and his secretary threw me out from his office (deleting me from his patients' list), which automatically cancelled operation.

As told my family doctor (Dr. Rohan), Dr. Szego, and Dr. El-Hakim, Dr. Morris had no right to eliminate me from among his patients; this is a criminal offense.

This is the first.


The second: there was no need in cystoscopy before the laser litholopaxy operation. Doctor Brian Morris carried out an unnecessary cystoscopy, infected the uric stones, and left me with an acute and life-threatening infection without any help from him (I called him innumerous times; lest messages on the answering machine; spoke with his secretary; and even sent a fax).

Now, even if I will immediately sign papers for operation with another doctor, it is necessary to wait - at least - a month, and an extra month with the infected stones: I may not survive.

Meanwhile, they opened for me the access to the result of a "control" ultrasound in another city (not in Montreal), which confirmed the diagnosis bladder stones.

The result nearly 3 weeks was delayed, and, thereby, the used one more lever of the psychological pressure upon me, which was among the factors that provoked an attempt to postpone the operation appointed to May 16, 2016.

I could not do an ultrasound in a private laboratory, because everywhere - where I called - they answered that the result will not be yielded on client's hands, but only will be sent to the doctor, and that the waiting time and data processing will occupy 12 (!) - or about this - days.

Now it became clearly visible what Dr. Morris did.

He essentially refused (during the periods of acute infection's recurrences) laboratory analyses, alpha-blockers, and antibiotics, thereby having premeditated the aggravation of BPE and the formation of kidneys-bladder stones, growth of the kidney cyst, and other complications.

Since 2013-2014 (when the surgery started to become one of 2 most effective solutions), he was sabotaging such an option as surgery, deliberately scaring me (when, in mid, or end of 2015, for the 1-st time raised the question about a surgery), when the surgical procedure already became an only perspective alternative, having not administrative the operation.

My demands to him and my assumptions of diagnoses, diagnostics and treatment - were true and justified.

Together with Dr. Morris, medical institutions of Montreal were engaged in sabotage of diagnostics and treatment".


May 16, 2016.

On May 16, 2016, the day of the cancelled surgery operation at Dr. Morris, I went to a suburb - to sign papers on the same operation at my former urologist, Dr. El-Hakim.


I had a rendezvous with him at 9:00.


To persuade him to do the surgery appeared not simple.


He agreed to perform the operation only after I told that the operation is already cancelled by Dr. Morris, who excluded me from the list of his patients.


I signed necessary papers, and now the operation had to be done in a more modest hospital, where everything is not at such level as in the city of Montreal, but there were no other choices.


In addition, Dr. El-Hakim doesn't work in this hospital, which will make the operation even more risky and potentially dangerous.


May 17, 2016.

New week began with new horrors.


On May 17, 2016, I visited the medical archive of St. Mary's Hospital.


On May 11, 2016, I sent a fax to this archive: the request of the cystoscopy's report copy. The cystoscopy was done by Dr. Morris on March 29, 2016, but he refused to show me cystoscopy's report, refused its copy, and completely closed for me the access to this report.


I also demanded the preoperative blood-urine tests and cardiogram on May 3, 2016.


Before I asked the attending physician to make the same request in archive, but it was answered that authorization of his patient is required (i.e. mine).


My family doctor, Dr. Rohan, had a courage to send his own request to the medical archive of St. Mary's Hospital (I asked him about it): because, when he attempted to access the cystoscopy, the blood-urine test, and the cardiogram (from May 3, 2016) through the computer network, these reports were absent in the electronic database. However, on his request, the medical archive sent a refusal note, under a pretext the "a family doctor must have his patient's consent" for obtaining the results of tests and exams, which is untrue, first, because the archive already have my application form, in which I asked about the same documents, and, secondly, a family doctor does not need his patient's permission for this.


Double deception!


In my inquiry, it is told that these results are urgently needed for an urgent surgical operation. But they not only refused to hand me over these reports, but also did not allow (as they at first promised) to arrive and to pick up the copies (printing which takes 1 minute!). (The doctor, who is ready to do the operation, told that if it is possible to obtain all above-mentioned medical documents (tests' results), then the suburban hospital will do a favor, and will speed up the date of operation - on the basis of already performed exams).


But in any situation there is a place to a miracle.


At least, one good person with normal ethical perception worked in St. Mary's medical archive, and, thanks to her, everything started to look not so gloomy.


The archive's chief "stealthily" helped me more than once here, and - this time - she quickened the issue of documents, and - on May 19 - I received the requested papers. If not she, this could last for months.


And what did I find?


The blood test: low hemoglobin, low erythrocytes; thrombocytes "on the verge". The abnormal results manifested insignificant deviations, and, still (as told me one doctor), an operation at such indicators may be contraindicated. As for thrombocytes, details obviously indicate the infectious nature (see the scientific and medical research: Alice Assinger, 'Platelets and infection - an emerging role of platelets in viral infection). (It is about a viral infection, but, by analogy, the same principles have to belong also to bacterial infections).


Operation was contraindicated on May 16, 2016, also on hematologic indicators, and on acute infection (I sent the result of the analysis from a private laboratory with the bacterium (enterococci) indication to Dr. Morris's office), and on sudden worsening of the cardiogram.


I suspect that, at someone's "request", the result of thrombocytes was "rounded": first, it is very suspicious that it is "exactly" on the verge of the norm, and, secondly, there is a special scientific table, which I used for verifying the calculations, and found out that - on combination of indicators - the "platelet" result cannot be true.


In other words, I was doomed to a contraindicated (in my situation) surgical operation, for which they had to prepare me, in advance having lifted hemoglobin, thrombocytes and erythrocytes, and having appointed a special course of antibiotics. Consequences could be the most terrifying.


So, the intuition - concerning this operation - did not fail me.


Now, the copy of the cystoscopy's summary and also the results of preoperative laboratory analyses and cardiogram dotted the i's and crossed the t's.


On May 19, 2016, I went to St. Mary's Hospital's archive to pick up all these medical documents, without waiting for post's delivery.


On one hand, it is a positive development that I was able to get rid of such a monster as Dr. Morris; on the other hand, I had a small chance to pass the operation at Dr. Morris without harmless consequences-complications, if could obtain these medical documents before May 16, 2016, and managed to persuade Dr. Morris to delay the surgery for 1 or 1 and a half week.


May 18, 2016, Wednesday.

On Friday, May 13, I called Dr. Morris's office again, because - both under the law, and under the unusual situation - he was obliged, having cancelled operation, to refer me to another surgeon, but not to abandon me to the mercy of fate.


But his main secretary told that I am already "eliminated" as his patients, and has to come on Wednesday, from 9 to 11, to take away the case history (having paid for it 15 dollars).


On Wednesday, May 18, 2016, I came (at 9:00) to the office of Dr. Morris to take the medical file (case history), but there was another secretary, whom this doctor began to use recently. Maybe, his "main" secretary (I think, an Italian by birth), who is very knowledgeable nurse, and quite a good woman with medical education, understood that, working at the office of this doctor, she has to support unethical things, and - whether herself decided to look for another job - whether Dr. Morris took a decision to replace her temporarily, but another secretary was working, it seemed, full time job. And this new madam (probably, a Romanian origin without experience, and almost not speaking neither in French, nor in English), told that she knows nothing, and has to ask the doctor.


After consultation with him, she said that I have to pay not 15 dollars (as - at first - it was announced by another - the ethical - secretary), but 50. The sum of 15 dollars corresponded to that sum, which I paid in the office of doctor Marie St. Jacques for the copy of my file, when she retired, and in the offices of 2 other doctors, who retired in last 2 years. So, this is a standard official amount of money for the similar procedure. Demanding 50 dollar for the same formality, Dr. Morris violated all medical, ethical, human, and legal norms, especially that he knew that I am unemployed in a very difficult situation.


Feeling unwell (very sick), and having imagined a need (in my state) to come once again to this office, I was forced to agree to pay this sum, though in our situation 50 dollars can be compared to a financial disaster. (If not help from Russia and Austria (from people, who adore my musical and literary works), and not help of 4 local Montreal residents, I would not be able to pay). I could not allow that the extorted (made up) sum was used as a pretext not to give me my case history.


(One more retreat: under Quebec law, when a doctor retires, or a doctor left his (her) patient, doctor charges from 10 to 20 dollars for the case history, not a cent above this).


I had to ask the consent of my wife, i.e. asked her what to do: agreeing to pay 50 dollars, or to postpone this procedure, and she answered that it is better to pay, and not to meet this vampire doctor any more.


But when we came home, it turned out that a big envelope (in which the secretary enclosed sheets of documents), contained only copies of different analyses that I myself copied for Dr. Morris, and so forth, including just white papers (tabula raca) and all kind of trash: 85 percent of the envelope's content, and the rest: copies of analyses and other exams, to which I was sent by Dr. Morris. I have all these copies, and I don't need them at all. There were no records of my visits to Dr. Morris, or other attributes of my medical file.


Thus, Dr. Morris deceived me, having put all kind of trash instead of the case history.

(Having left his office, I checked 2-3 pages, but could not quickly realize that it is not the medical file, because Dr. Morris deliberately put the copies of the tests, which he administrated, on the top of other papers).


I demanded the receipts, but, when I got it, I did not realize that, instead of "chart" (case history, medical file), it was written: "copies".


A doctor, who is capable of it - is capable of everything.


(The only document necessary for me in his envelope - was an incomplete (preliminary) cystoscopy report, so, it turned out that Dr. Morris forced me to pay 50 dollars for one single short medical document!)


Besides, just on the next day I received this report from the medical archive.


In my letter to one of my close friends, I wrote about the events of those days:


"Summing up the results (now I hold in my hands several reports of medical exams contradicting each other):

1) the abdominal-pelvic ultrasound (3 ("5") February, 2016) did not find any stones, which was impossible if they already were in the bladder by then (especially that I was fasting 2 days, and that I was (by then) a very skinny person), particularly, considering the sizes of the stones shown in a month by other exams (around 1.50 cm);

2) the computer tomography (8 March, 2016), which "saw" a "set" of bladder stones, but did not consider neither their number (quantity) and composition, nor their arrangement in the bladder (the biggest was measured as 1.40 cm);

3) the oral statement of Dr. Morris during cystoscopy's procedure (29 March, 2016): 4 stones slightly less than 1 cm;

4) the official report of cystoscopy (now received from the medical archive), which mentioned 4 stones, too, but without specifying their approximate size (even if cystoscopy does not reveal the exact sizes of uric stones up to a millimeter, still, it MUST estimate their approximate sizes), location, and composition;

5) last "control" abdominal-pelvic ultrasound (14 April, 2016): 4 stones, each around 1 cm.

6) an alternative ultrasound (27 April, 2016), which mentioned 3 stones - 2 near 1 centimeter, and 1 - 2.2 cm;

7) another alternative ultrasound (26 May, 2016) mentioned only 2 floating mobile stones;

8) an additional alternative ultrasound (15 June, 2016), which mentioned about a motionless cluster from 4 stones on the right side of the bladder by sizes of 14, 13, 10 and 9 mm;


Running further forward in time: the surgery operation of litholopaxy revealed 3 uric stones (the biggest of which was 24 mm), but not 4 stones.


Such serious divergences cannot be a mere consequence of objective factors.


Besides, the computer tomography obviously underestimated the sizes of stones: it was done - probably - "to justify" that ultrasound (3 February (actual date) ("5" February (a fake date in the papers), 2016), which did not find any bladder calculi. The same can be told about the cystoscopy: in his oral statement, Dr. Morris deliberately underestimated uric stones' sizes, and in his written report he did not mentioned bladder stones' sizes at all.


I consulted non-officially with 2 urologists, and 3 urologists advised me online, claimed that such inexplicable differences between different medical imaging scans do not correspond to any scientific and medical practice. I talked to several more knowing doctors, including one Polish female radiologist, and none of them could realize - how a bit more sensitive and precise in relation to bladder computer 8-3-2016 tomography (only kidneys are equally observable by tomography and ultrasound) appeared to be incomparably less exact than 27-4-2016 ultrasonography.


The fact that the ultrasound showed 3 stones - can be explained with the fact that 2 stones were taken for one, but then it turns out that all of them practically do not exceed 1 cm that contradicts the computerized tomography since a divergence in 30-40 mm: this is a very serious difference".


Other "mysterious" facts and events (around the bladder stones) were already described above, as well of some suggestions, including the most "fantastic" (see above). According to some of the hypotheses, no uric stones existed in the bladder before the cystoscopy, which is proven (indirectly) by the contradiction of diagnostic procedures; by symptomatology (if we mean the asymptomatic "presence" of uric stones); by laboratory analyses; by incomplete, controversial, irregular, and suspiciously incorrect cystoscopy's report; and by other things.


In the same letter to a friend I wrote further (translation from Polish original):

"The result of the present situation of my affairs is such: while I am on antibiotics, I feel more or less well. The concern is that I am already - with short (few days) breaks - nearly 2 months on strong antibiotics, and, considering the condition of my liver and kidneys, I am on a limit of acceptable. If the bladder stones are real, and they are infected (which is indisputable after cystoscopy and caused by it infection), then, as soon as antibiotics are stopped - the infection returns at once.

An only solution - is the litholopaxy operation as soon as possible, but this exact solution was a priori sabotaged by Dr. Morris. He not only deliberately destroyed even a slightest possibility of recovery; not only blocked my access to the most perspective curable remedies and solutions; not only provoked the most serious complications and scenarios by sabotaging the lab tests, diagnostic procedures, and refusing antibiotics; not only literary forced me to pass obviously contraindicated cystoscopy, being fully aware of its deadly complications; not only refused any medical help during the development of cystoscopy's life-threatening complications; not only provoked my justified fear to be operated by him; not only artfully staged the cancellation of the litholopaxy surgery; but also did everything possible to block me an access to this URGENT surgery, which is a direct attempt on my life, only stretched in time. Only one of dozens of urologists in Montreal and suburban small towns, whom I contacted be fax or by phone, agreed to perform the surgery: my former non-Montreal urologist, but the government (I feel so) will now sabotage the operation, motivating medical bureaucrats, and delaying the surgery until my death or irreversible - terminal - damage to internal organs...

The implication of the government into all these events of the "medical" sphere is proven by the parallel (simultaneous (coordinated) persecution in other spheres: threats, provocations, police intimidation and surveillance, administrative pressure, etc., including 7 recent phone calls. Same people called from visually similar to governmental Canadian phone numbers, or from India, and, in the name of Immigration Canada, threatened to strip my wife, and me of Canadian citizenship; or, in the name of the revenue agency (taxation bureau) threatened by imprisonment. Each of such anonymous terrorist phone calls is delivered in the very moment of my return home from one or another hospital.

For example, there were 3 calls from 2 different phone numbers, allegedly, from the revenue agency (one of the phone numbers was 1-855-881-8141). The same voice claimed that I, allegedly, conceal my revenues, and threaten with prison.


In the beginning, they mutter that the revenue service opened an "internal" criminal case on me, and, at the end, they say that if I - or my lawyer - will not contact them urgently: I will be prosecuted.

It is one more example of the fact that so-called to "scam telemarketing agencies" work hand in hand with the repressive agencies of the different governments, and, in particular, with some group of officials inside the Canadian government.

It was already told above that at the very moment of my return home after that abysmal case in Royal Victoria Hospital's emergency department, I received an anonymous terrorist phone call from the phone number 1-416-808-2222, and was threatened by the deprivation of my wife's and mine Canadian citizenship". (end of citation)


On May 18, 2016, I came - accompanied by my wife - to the office of Dr. Morris, and demanded the copies of all documents of my medical file (I told him - literally - the following: "My chart with all your rapports, notes, office examinations, and office tests").


I told him also that this is needed for the rescue of my health and for the safety of litholopaxy operation, which will be performed by another doctor.


Dr. Morris frowned, answered nothing, and jumped out of the reception room, but soon returned back. He (maybe) had no patients at this time, or not many patients, and just loafed from a room to a room.


Dr. Morris approached the secretary, and, seeing that I am standing near her table, did not begin to tell anything to her, but just wrote something on a piece of paper, and the secretary began to print a pack of documents from the computer, and also copying some sheets.


For this service, Dr. Morris took from us $50 Canadian dollars, instead of 10-15, and, in completion, cursed me, calling me a "robber", and claiming that I (having cancelled the operation) "robbed" him for "thousands of dollars" and "robbed the state".


I did not dare to answer anything to him, not wishing to disgrace my own vanity by arguing about something that he already perfectly knew: that it was he - who formally cancelled the operation (not me); that it is horrific to lay down on the operating table to a surgeon, who is so angry at his patient that does not greet him, does not answer his greetings, and does not want to speak with him except of vomiting charges and reproaches though he himself is guilty "higher than his head"; that it is impossible to comply to an operation at a person who brought his patient to this pitiful situation, inflicting sickness and incalculable sufferings; and that he declared to me on May 9, 2016, that he refuses me as a patient and that I should look for another urologist.


Later I specially learned in the hospital, and found out that the hospital does not bear any losses if an operation is cancelled. Especially, as I discussed the cancellation (more precisely - even not cancellation, but a delay) of the operations in advance, and not "in the last days", and even sent a fax.


But (I will remind once again) - before asking about the operation's delay - I called Dr. Morris with a request to send me the printout of cystoscopy's report and the report of preoperative tests, and also asked to perform additional exams in connection with my bad general condition, heartache, and other indispositions, which could do the future operation riskier, with unpredictable consequences. However, Dr. Morris began to shout at me and he to accuse me that, allegedly, having cancelled cystoscopy (on which he firstly forced me on March 3, 2016), I already yielded losses for hundreds of dollars - that, obviously, was a lie. And Dr. Morris tore off the conversation.


Even considering the current situation from any (including universal, common to all mankind) positions, it is necessary to recognize that Dr. Morris's words of are not worth a penny - because the facts stubbornly speak not in his advantage, or not in favor of St. Mary's Hospital (or both). Attacking me almost with his fists, Dr. Morris tried to provoke a conflict, but I did not give in on provocation.


Why an obviously urgent situation (urgent from the very beginning, i.e. from the state for the beginning of March 2016) did not lead to purpose of an urgent litholopaxy operation?


Why the operation was appointed to the second half of May?


Running forward, it is necessary to notice what the Lakeshore Hospital, enduring a dramatic crisis during that period, still, found an opportunity to prepare for me a place for operation in a month? Unlike St.-Mary's Hospital (which has thousand times more opportunities and resources), a small (to Montreal measures) Lakeshore Hospital - enduring by then a real crash - was crowded, and its opportunities were extremely limited. And, nevertheless, THIS hospital found an opportunity to organize an operation in a month (after signing of consent), whereas the hospital with absolutely different opportunities and resources appointed an URGENT operation in 2 months though it was obvious that - after infection of bladder stones by cystoscopy - the operation became already not just urgent, but an emergency surgery.


After April 7 (approximately on April 11 or 12), I called the preoperative office (room G-300), and told everything in details: about what happened after cystoscopy; about my address to the emergency department of Verdun Hospital; and about my emergency situation of an ongoing acute urological infection; about kidney pains; and about the laboratory analysis in this ER, which showed the creatinine level at 66 - instead of my usual 80 (only in 2 weeks prior to the appeal to Verdun hospital).


In my phone conversations with Dr. Morris's secretary till April 15, 2016 - I, among other things, was interested - why an urgent (in my situation) operation was appointed only to the second half of May, and asked why it is not renominated to a closer date, mentioning also the bizarre affair in the emergency department of Verdun Hospital.


After my appeal to emergency department of Royal Victoria Hospital, need to speed up the litholopaxy operation became already shouting, but the medical bureaucrats just closed their eyes to it, ignoring all human norms, medical ethics, and even criminal liability.


There is no doubt that Dr. Morris, who was zealously tracing all data of my integrated file in the File Sante Quebec, all my addresses to other doctors, and in medical institutions (and also being informed by emergency department of Royal Victoria hospital), was aware of everything that happens to me, but did nothing to bring closer the date of operation.


Being perfectly informed on everything that happened to me, and already having all exams' reports from the preoperative office of St.-Mary's Hospital, Dr. Morris did nothing, and did not attempted to bring closer the date of operation.


On May 3, 2016, when I had exams, interviews, and tests in the preoperative office of St.-Mary's Hospital, I, again, in details, told about everything to Dr. Segal. Moreover, Dr. Segal prescribed antibiotics - concerning an acute urological infection - not only in connection with the complaints and symptoms, but - most likely - also because, perhaps, already received the preliminary result of the laboratory analyses, which was confirming the presence of an infection by then on the sum of aberrations from the norm. And even it does not exhaust all nuances: because I brought (and handed to Dr. Segal) the copy of the last urine test's report, where it was written "urological infection", and its activator, a concrete microorganism, was specified (enterococci). And, again, it is possible that Dr. Segal - certainly a positive person - tried to change the date the operation for the first week of May, or, the opposite, tried to delay it, but just was not allowed to do it...


The phrase, which Dr. Morris told me at parting, is very interesting.


After he asking in an affirmative tone (i.e. he knew the answer perfectly himself) - where is the office of the urologist, who is going now to do the operation, and having listened the name of this town, doctor Morris said that he knows there "only one urologist", and, at the same time, "very good urologist" (and called a surname of this doctor, a person of the Jewish origin, the Jewish orthodox), and added that there are "NO MORE" "urologists" practicing there. In other words, he not just pejoratively spoke of his colleague (about Dr. El-Hakim), but also offensively, at the same time trying and to intimidate me by the prospect of operation at an "incompetent" surgeon, and to force me to regret the cancellation of operation at him, at doctor Morris.


I doubt that his attitude towards his colleague was influenced by the national origin of the last, but no probability should be excluded.


When we - my wife and me - came back home from Dr. Morris's office (on the way home, we were very densely watched by police), it turned out that Dr. Morris deceived us: in the pack of the printed-out sheets there was neither a full official cystoscopy's report (which later was declared "missing"), nor the official reports' records about my visits to Dr. Morris, nor the copy of analyses, which I did on requisitions of Dr. Morris, nor the results of the checks in his treatment room, neither records about surveys and symptoms, nor records about the prescribed medications.


Instead of all this, a pack of trash papers was placed into the envelope: copies of some laboratory analyses, which I brought and left to Dr. Morris, etc.


He impudently deceived us, and even took for from us 50 dollars for this scam!


This act of Dr. Morris puts a fat end at the end of the whole series of his unethical (if not immoral) acts, and completes his moral portrait.


Even if he - as the doctor - would do everything correctly, adequately and in due time reacting to a condition of his patient, but, in the same time, ignoring patient's suffering and not taking patient's sufferings into account, neglecting it and rendering no help to reduce the torments: crosses out all his professional (doctor's) qualities.


He also perfectly understood that he subjects my health to additional danger, refusing the file, which - under the law - he obliged to provide to me, and refusing the full summary (not just a preliminary report) of cystoscopy.


On December 13, 2016, before the 2-nd urological operation, which was much more serious than the 1- st, at 16:30 p.m., I came to the office to Dr. Morris again, with a request to explain a phrase in his preliminary cystoscopy's summary, but he already not only cursed me and shouted at me aggressively clenching his fists, but put forward big financial claims to me, having said that "because of your [my] literary trash" his family (if I correctly understood his cries in such an already stressful situation) lost tens of thousands of dollars.


Knowing that a difficult operation is inevitable and that the cystoscopy's (March 29, 2016) complete data can help with the 2-nd surgery's happy end, he - all the same - preferred spiteful revenge and attacks, instead of medical help to his patient.


During the same visit, when I demanded a copy of my medical file (case history), Dr. Morris said to my wife, speaking with her in French, that my alleged "hypochondria" and the fact that I just like "to make a mountain out of a molehill", caused him a set of troubles.


His statement about my imaginary "hypochondria" to my wife was highly immoral and was made in defiance of ethical and medical standards and norms.


Moreover, this statement of doctor Morris played nearly a crucial role in a tragic end of another episode, of which we will speak later.


Summing up the result of what happened because of Dr. Morris, it is necessary to pay attention to discrepancy of his actions and acts.


A number of his actions was quite adequate and timely from the medical point of view, whereas his other actions and acts were cardinally opposite, and represented a striking contrast. The problem is that explaining such inconsistency, such radical contrast's dichotomy of his acts only by his unstable and explosive character, or by my personal qualities, and by our interaction - is incomplete and puzzling from any party. This riddle is further complicated by the fact that Dr. Morris could not, at all his authority and influence in the medical circles, to arrange persecutions of his patient in all medical institutions of this huge city, loss of laboratory analyses, and police-torment methods from other doctors and medics.


Consequently, there are only 2 possible interpretations of the motives behind his actions: 2 main generators, functioning simultaneously.


The 1-st suggestion is that his "correct" prescriptions and requisitions were motivated not by the medical expediency, but by other, hidden, non-medical motivations. If, for example, tired by Dr. Morris's refusals of medications, exams, analyses, and medical solutions, I used to turn to other doctors, and (for example) another doctor prescribed the right medication, then Dr. Morris prescribed the same or similar medication himself. If another doctor administrated a test, which found significant abnormalities or pathologies, the test, arranged by another doctor, was sabotaged, and a similar test, administrated by Dr. Morris, was falsified to conceal the same discoveries (if this was a temporarily health problem), or was adequate (in case of a permanent serious problem). Therefore, his "adequate" actions were quasi adequate, motivated by completely different triggers.


The 2-nd inevitable conclusion is that Dr. Morris is just a small part of medical terrorism, because other sinister forces were behind the series of all these terrible incidents.


Once I happened to hear in the St.-Mary's Hospital about a group of medical activists and participants of sponsors' assets (that "was dug round" here), who share a common for all of them ideology. According to this ideological platform, the equality of the representatives of different property groups in the field of the access to medical services and medical and diagnostic tools only harms society. The same applies, as they read out, to the carriers of "harmful" - from their point of view - opinions, which different from their own view of the world.


At first, I was not sure that I correctly understood the meditative drive of this statement, with its very special figurative stylistics: that this statement meant a group of the individuals connected to St. Mary's Hospital, etc.


But, in the summer of 2016, I accidentally heard the statement from the lips of a carrier of similar ideology, one of those, whom the accusatory note of initial information meant.


This doctor notified his adherents that there are clear and available theses of their common ideological platform, which explain and justify their position. According to their views, an overlong life (age) of modern old residents undermines immune and genetic protection of the present mankind. "Excessively" extending life expectancy by means of the latest medical and pharmacological developments, we, allegedly, ruin the health of mankind. Women give birth to children far over 30 (and sometimes already closer to 40-year-old age); men become fathers, when to they turn nearly 60. From it, children are born sick and weak, and this genetic degradation is fixed by generations and accelerates the same trend.


(They do not wish even to hear that this is a direct result of horrible social and economic policy of ugly modern regimes led by the same freaks as the carriers of this ideology - because to give birth and raise children becomes too expensive for ordinary people).


"Uncontrolled" - according to them - use of antibiotics leads to emergence and reproduction of thousands of resistant strains menacing the future existence of the human race. Weak and sickly individuals, who lived not more than 20 years during the former eras, presently, supposedly, live longer exclusively due to medical technologies, producing sick posterity and provoking emergence of new resistant bacteria.


(That it is such firms as Monsanto, Moderna, and Pfizer; that this is the result of the environmental pollution, drugs, intensive use of surgeries, extensive exploitation, and social ulcers generate everything that they put the blame on someone else, they also do not want to hear).


Poverty and haplessness, according to them: it is not a social disease, but a genetic constitution of those, who are among the poor and the disadvantaged. Inability to provide money to themselves, or inability to achieve high income: it is, allegedly, a congenital genetic "deficiency", but not a product of terrible social inequality and crimes of many representatives of the propertied classes and ruling circles.


Thus, for them - poverty: it is the same disease as poliomyelitis, or different congenital diseases, but not the societal diseases, but the diseases of the victims of this social illness.


Proceeding from such (topsy-turvy) directive, the access to medical help extends "too much" the life of poor people, and makes the life of the poor people "too good", spreading this "disease" in breadth and into deep.


It is clear, that such doctors (the carriers of such ideology) cannot be allowed to patients on a gun shot.


But will they begin to preach their vampires' views openly?


It is possible that this group of moral freaks is united and acts under a cover of some official organization, for example, of some sponsor's council, some firm or association, sect or congregation, cult, etc.


If a similar ideology won many supporters among medics of St.-Mary's Hospital - there is nothing surprising in such an atmosphere in acts of doctors like Roven and Morris, and others.


This infection among doctors is more dangerous than cholera and other deadly infections. This infection is widespread apparently not only in this hospital.


It is possible to put long dots here.....


CHAPTER 6. Since 26 May 2016.


May 26, 2016.

On May 26, 2016, I managed to pass a "control" ultrasonography in the radiology of Westmount Sq. (at 7:30 in the morning).


This private radiology demanded to pay $200 for this procedure.


My friends from Russia and Austria helped to pay for this ultrasound; otherwise I would never undergo it. But to receive an access even to a paid ultrasonography: it appeared absolutely not simply for me.


Since May 7, we (my wife, me, and our daughter) began to learn - how much to pay; what terms; how to register in reception; and how to receive the result-report.


On May 13, 2016, I sent them a fax with ultrasound's requisition from a doctor. On the same day, they called me from there (no one was at home), and left a message on the answering machine.


On May 16, 2016, they called me again and left a message (asking to call back). But what for? It was rather simple to leave (on the answering machine) the date of ultrasound's appointment, that's all. In the past, it was a standard practice. You bring, or send by fax a requisition, and receive appointment's date by phone. However, so-called "anti-terrorist" legislations, dictatorial total control, tyrannical terrorist marketing aggression, and oppressive video-surveillance and personal data unregulated accumulation - generated unnecessary medical institutions' spying habits, hunting for personal data, and accelerated the usage of medical tools for intimidation and punishment of dissidents. I knew that a simple telephone conversation with Radimed will bring attempts of extortion of personal information, and, consequently, will expose me to the forces, which are implicated into destroying, falsifying, and altering medical data.


However, if a call from Radimed would arrive when I am home, I would answer the call instantly. But it seemed that they decided to play on my nerves, calling EXCLUSIVELY when no one is at home. How did they know that no one is at home? This is not a question addressed to me, but, concluding from the permanent, aggressive and intimidating police surveillance, illegal searches at my home, and other oppressive actions, the Radimed laboratory received commands from the forces, which controlled such surveillance.


So, it was not something unexpected, when, on May 16, 2016, I called Radimed innumerous times, starting from 13:29, but my calls did not get through.


On May 17, 2016, I resent the fax with the requisition and with an addition: "having received the requisition, please, report the date of the ultrasound procedure".


They called me from there again 6 times (!), and all 6 times - when nobody was at home (whether not a suspicious coincidence?).


[Normally, it happens at us extremely seldom when no one is at home, but, in the recent time, it happened more often in due my urgent visits to ER, or my emergency visits to doctors.]


On May 20, 2016, I called there again, and this time their telephone was not dead or permanently busy, but Radimed's secretary claimed that did not find any faxes from me: neither the 1-st, nor the 2-nd! By her tone, I suggested that she tells lies.


And here that's interestingly: if I received the result of one control (abdominal-pelvic) ultrasound from the suburb of Montreal till May 16, 2016; and if I underwent the ultrasonound in a private radiology, and received its result till May 16, 2016 (which would confirm the diagnosis bladder stones) - then I, possibly, would not begin to initiate an investigation about delaying or cancelling of the litholopaxy operation.


But in the 1-st place the delayed the result for an unprecedented amount of time (the doctor told - who administrated the ultrasound told that, in this hospital, normally the result comes not more than after 3-5 days), about 3 weeks; and, in the 2-nd place, my faxes and, clearly, the record for the date of ultrasound - were gone.


After my 3-rd series of faxes, Radimed's secretary, finally, called with the appointment date, suggesting that I can come only in 5 days, May 25, 2016.


Only in couple of days everything became clear to me.


Knowing that Dr. Morris and other enemies are accessing my medical data on everyday basis, I blocked the access to my file in the Medical system (including Sante Quebec) till May 24, 2016. So, it seemed that people in Radimed waited until my file opens, to look (in advance) at the results of the previous medical scans' exams. That's was what they wanted to be guided by. I was - for some reasons - sure that I blocked my Quebec Medical file till the end of May. When I came into the registration, and understood that I was mistaken - it was already too late. If I am right in my assumptions, then, having found (in my file) the CT-scan report (bladder stones), cystoscopy, and the April ultrasound, any radiology in Canada will not go against the conclusions of the previous exams: so everything is arranged here. In other words, even if there are no bladder stones, they - all the same - would "find" them. And it is does not matter if, in my case, there real bladder stones: I mean settings in principle, i.e. how they, most likely, work.


The culture of lie, deception, falsification, and scam in the medial environment is devastative for everyone, who had enough courage to look into things without the pink glasses. This is why another strangeness struck so hard: lack of ANY symptoms, so far I am on antibiotics.


During my ordeals I communicated with five urologists, and every one of them did not tire to repeat that the cystolithiasis cannot be present without ANY symptoms. Besides, whether the TOTAL absence of symptoms at antibiotics means that there is no cystolithiasis, or that the calculi have an artificial origin?


There is one more absolutely inexplicable strangeness.


If I truly understood 3 doctors (one of whom is a nephrologist), the presence of calculi at the system of the urological path cannot but affect the results of the biochemical urinalyses. It (if, I repeat, I correctly understood everything) - is absolutely impossible. Why, in that case, ANY of the laboratory analyses did not reveal (at all) anything that would allow to assume the presence of an urolithiasis BEFORE cystoscopy on March 28, 2016?!


See the image of the abdominal-pelvic ultrasound's report below (26, May, 2016):


See above: the receipt for 200 dollars for ultrasound on May 26, 2016, and the report-result of this ultrasonography. A stone in the left kidney, allegedly, "disappeared" in 2 years. A stone in the right kidney, allegedly, found by the computer tomography: was never confirmed any more.


The main values of ultrasound: are contradictions with the cystoscopy, performed by Dr. Morris.


If Dr. Morris claimed that there are "4 stones", then here only 2 stones are mentioned, the biggest of which - is about 2 cm.


If Dr. Morris said (orally) that these stones - are stable and do not move, then here it is told about 2 mobile stones.


The next conclusion, which can be made of this ultrasound's report: the cystosis intensification in different bodies and in different parts of the body is directly linked with urological infections, since, in connection with the uric stones formation of and their infecting by cystoscopy, this process accelerated.


It confirms that the process of formation of cysts was started by the sabotage of treatment of the initial urological infection (1 Jan. 2001), its chronic development later, and its complications-consequences.


But the general meaning of this ultrasound's report: it is that the serious undermining of my health sharply accelerated during the last time and that now the score goes for months and that - if the sabotage of medical care is not stopped in the closest weeks - it will come to an end for me in the saddest way soon...


Considering the background of this ultrasound exam, and probable aspiration of this radiology "to play for time" - until that date, when my medical file in the Sante Quebec database opens (if this assumption really has the reasons: then the result of ultrasonography may be (at least - partly) questionable), there are no guarantees that the reading - interpretation of the data of scanning - was issued not under an influence of everything that was collected around my "case".


But all the same, the report turned out interesting: it seems, only 2 stones, with smaller sizes (than showed by the previous exams).


Again, I will sum up the results.


Ultrasound in February 2016: no uric calculi in the bladder.

CT-scan in March 2016: "set of stones", the biggest of which is 1.4 cm.

Cystoscopy tells nothing about the calculi sizes and their arrangement (4 stones).

The "governmental" ("public") ultrasound: 3 stones: 2 stones - slightly bigger than 1 cm, and the 3-rd is 2.1 cm.

We may consider that 2 stones are taken for 1.

It turns out 10 mm less (than the tomography's estimation), and the quantity - 1 stone less (than the cystoscopy showed).

And, at last, one more ultrasound scan in a private radiology: 2 stones - 11 mm and 19 mm.

1 stone less than in the report of the previous ultrasound, and 30 mm (a considerable variance for both tomography and ultrasonography) difference by size.


Of course, all exams, except cystoscopy, are of conditional sensitivity and accuracy (as for the quantity of stones), but not like 2 more or 2 less (normally, the difference must be not more than "1"). As for their sizes: they have to be rather exact, with a divergence in 2-5, but not 30 (!) mm.


An "amateur" theory: all differences are not of great importance since neither tomography, nor ultrasound can be exact. (Though - already very suspicious is that a bit less sensitive ultrasound yielded a result with incomparably bigger accuracy than tomography).


However, it is not true, since - consultations with experts and academic literature lead to an inevitable conclusion that such significant differences just cannot be correct!


Another version (if to accept an assumption about rather high precision of all exams): the number and the sizes of calcic stones gradually "decrease" with time. But calcic stones cannot dissolve. And, even if it would be possible by means of some chemicals, the same chemicals would damage the bladder and other internal organs!


Only stones of artificial origin, or already undergone some processing could break up gradually. Such an assumption would be possible only in case that - for any fantastic reason - they were artificially created.


(There is a theory about the dissolution of uric stones by asparcam (if it is not a profanation), but, first, nobody sent it to me, and, secondly, even if I would get it, it is about dissolution of small stones in kidneys, and the possibility of dissolution of the average size stones in the bladder is even more doubtful).


Also in favor of bladder stones artificial origin tells whether identical, whether differing "one after another" on 10 mm size of calculi: the nature would hardly create 4 identical stones.


And the last thing: if to trust the result of February ultrasound, no stones in were contained in the bladder by then, and the uric calculi could not be formed during only few weeks (in the period from ultrasound in February to CT-scan in March) ...


Prior to litholopaxy operation I passed 2 more abdominal-pelvic ultrasounds, and all results were differed from each other.


The results-reports of 2 other ultrasounds (mentioned above) are given below.


Further, the comparative analysis of the ultrasound report from February 3, 2016 - with the ultrasound report from June 2016, will be also given below.


CHAPTER 7. June 2016.


JUNE 2016.


June 2, 2016.

Antibiotics, which were appointed by doctor Segal, did not help, too.


Most likely, with the stones infected by cystoscopy, and with this very aggressive infection, neither the dose, nor duration of Cipro could yield any result by definition, and only saved me (for a very short time) from the same disaster, which burst when I had to address to Royal Victoria Hospital's emergency department of (April 7, 2016).


First of all, now an URGENT cysto-litholopaxy operation was needed crucially, but the operation was cancelled by Dr. Morris, and - instead of replacing it with an URGENT operation at another surgeon, the Medical System headed for destroying the health (ignoring even a life-threatening outcome) of an obstinate patient, who, if not by legal claims, then by reproaches to specific medical criminals - infuriated her.


On June 2, 2016, I had to address to Metro-Medic clinic with a new attack of a UT infection.


I got on reception to Dr. LaChance, who appointed another antibiotic - Septra (I took the first pill on the same day).


Everything was done (by Dr. LaChance) operatively and properly, only his attitude towards me was for some reasons aggressive and "accusatory" - as though I was guilty of something before him...


But all doctors, whom I saw after the conflict with Dr. Morris, "were angry" at me, and it means that they were up in arms against me as small screws of the SYSTEM "angered" on me.


In principle, Dr. LaChance did a very right thing: first, he did not begin to wait for the results of the laboratory analysis, understanding that antibiotics in my deplorable state are necessary for me, and, secondly, having appointed another antibiotic than Cipro (which seemed to be ineffective after cystoscopy), he hoped that this latter will be more effective.


At a superficial glance, so it really was. But only at the first glance...


Much more seriously than his biased - negative - attitude towards me - was the fact that Dr. LaChance lost sight of something or deliberately sabotaged the UV test, and also made a strange choice concerning antibiotics, because there was a following.


(I will begin everything one after another).

(Further, there is more detailed and more precise description of everything that happened in doctor's office and beyond its limits).


So, on June 1, 2016, exactly in 6 days after the termination 2-weeks course of Cipro 1000 XL, the infection returned.


On June 2 (Thursday) I went to the walk-in policlinic, where sometimes I address in urgent cases.


Doctors there are knowing experts and very lovely people.


For several years I, apparently, already met everyone, who work in this clinic.


But this time I got to a doctor, whom I never saw here before.


This doctor talked to me unusually roughly and aggressively.


I waited for him in an empty office around 40 minutes or more.


This was also an unprecedented case in this policlinic on my memory. A policlinic is not an ER in a hospital, and if you waited for a call in an office, you wait at most for 5-10 minutes there.


The nurse left the 2-nd (internal) door of the office (an exit to internal rooms for personnel) not tightly closed, and I saw in a crack that all the time - while I waited, - some young doctor (37-38 y.o.) sat at the computer near the office (near the door).


Feeling that I could not wait till doctor's appearance without visiting the toilet, I looked out of this internal door - to ask the nurse or the doctor if I can leave the office for a couple of minutes.


Having seen me, this young doctor shuddered and got terribly angry.


It turned out that he studies - in the computer - my file in the Medical System at Sante Quebec web site (all my analyses and exams, all my visits to hospitals, to doctors, etc. - are stored there).


I made an impression that all 40 minutes he studied my file.


What bewildered (and worried) me - is that Dr. LaChance had studied my medical file not in the office room, which has a computer, but in the "exernal" (general) clinic's computer outside of the office. An only reason for using this "out-of-office" computer could be Dr. LaChance's desire to hide from me his studying of my file, and, possibly, information about me on Internet. Otherwise, he would use the computer in the office room.


But why so long, and for what purpose? And why he was shocked so much that I learned about his scrupulous study of my medical file, and reacted so abruptly when realized what I saw how long he studies my file?


(See - in the description of events for June 21, 2016, - what else doctor LaChance could "study" in the "internal" clinic's computer).


I will add that Dr. LaChance printed out took with himself printouts of all my last analyses and contraindications, including the urinalysis from the private laboratory - where accurately and clearly were underlined the bacterium (Enterococci) and antibiotics, which successfully suppress it (except the penicillin row - contraindicated to me - it was clearly specified: Cipro, and Nitrofurantoin). It was clearly indicated about Vancomycin, Ampicillin, Doxycycline, Nitrofurantoin, and Ciprofloxacin, but Septra was not indicated.


Nevertheless, this doctor prescribed Septra antibiotic, which was not specified in the printout of the analysis.


He sent me to collect a sample for an office test, and gave me a special package for preliminary disinfection.


Usually I do not pay attention to such trifles (and my vision became not 100 percent - as earlier), but this time I - by miracle - noticed that this bag is slightly torn. Someone wanted to infect me with some "additional" infection?


The torn bag for disinfection (see above) of tiny antiseptic napkins given by doctor LaChance on June 2, 2016.


The doctor administrated a URN test with microbiology culture (again, he did everything properly and adequately), and told that I have 2 choices: to pay 100 dollars for the private laboratory at this policlinic, and to receive a preliminary result in 24 hours, or to collect a sample (before the 1-st intake of antibiotic), to put it till tomorrow in the fridge, and to carry it to the district clinic (CLSC) in the morning.


I tried to express my doubt, having reminded that only collecting a sample for cytology suits for the analysis after the fridge, and for microbiology it does not work, but the doctor roughly tore off me, and expelled me from the office.


Before taking antibiotic Septra, I wanted to see a full range of contraindications (the pharmacy gave me a very short and poor list of 3-4 most cumulative side effects), but Septra did not appear in my home database, and the Network computer did not work.


(I will remind that, having returned home after cystoscopy (March 29, 2016), I found all 3 computers bust. The same (single-type) damages of motherboard's video output of all computers indicate a diversion for 100 percent).


In my serious condition, I could not be engaged in repairing of 3 computers, or in searching of second-hand purchase. The situation forced me to start taking Septra without studying the complete list of contraindications and side effects.


Next day (in the morning) I went to CLSC clinic where I was told in its laboratory that my sample from the fridge is no good since it could be stored prior to laboratory at most 2 hours.


It is difficult to believe that Dr. LaChance, working in the walk-in clinic (!) could not know about it. Besides, for the next day, I found out that - during my yesterday's appointment with Dr. LaChance some of the public (free) laboratories still worked. It is weird that the doctor did not know about it.


When I, nevertheless, could reach the description of contraindications and side effects of Septra, first, I already took 2 pill, and, secondly, it turned out that Septra is contraindicated at strong leanness (and - for the last months - I became terribly thin), low hemoglobin, low erythrocytes, etc. The whole list of Septra's contraindications precisely corresponded to my individual case, and there is told that - at such contraindications - the side effects can be deadly.


And here, on Friday, June 3, after a lunch, I suddenly felt badly. It became dark in my eyes; it became difficult to breathe; it started to ring in my ears; a terrible weakness spread over my whole body; legs gave away; the nape was poured by lead, etc.


Then, in general, everything grew dim, and legs became heavy. I fell down to sofa, and had a sensation that I am dying. Only miraculously I somehow recovered from this attack of sickness.


In long-term sense Septra gave a serious skin allergy, and, at the same time - mental aberrations-disturbances. At first - several times proximity to a loss of consciousness. Darkness in the eyes; notable dizziness; heart began to beat without restraint. Then - heartaches, short wind, breath problems.


It seemed like a heart attack or a stroke. Perhaps, brain's short-term ischemia.


The breath problem reminded a psychosomatic asthma.


Then this state passed, problems of panic, depersonalization, depression, etc. came to its place.


Possibly, I could die of suffocation or cardiac arrest then at once. It seems, a blow to the cardiovascular and immune system was struck, and maybe blood components changed in the dangerous direction. Perhaps, allergic reaction to Septra broke the heart rhythm.


By the evening (Friday), it seemed, the normal state of general health was regained, and, probably, it was worth to stay in bed and sleep. But I could not jump into the bed, without having taken a shower. And here, after the bathtub, I began to grasp air again, not gasping normally, and other dangerous symptoms returned. Several symptoms frighten very much: ringing in the ears (not stopping after the attack on Friday); when I bend down, darkens cover the eyes; the nape is poured by lead; and it becomes difficult to breathe.


Since June 3, also the external dreadful allergy does not fall down: palms of hands, fingers, wrists swell up, scratch and redden; whole hillocks jump out on all body, and it develops against the background of very serious general condition.


Beside this, I am on the verge of leukemia and heart attack or a stroke because of a continuous 3-months infection. Each new round of an infection forces the immune system to react more and more dangerously, with high (abnormal) leukocytes, development of monocytes (which should not be present in blood in general), etc. The cellular balance of blood is loosened. The cardiovascular system is exposed to destructive impact of the immune system reacting to an infection, too - and it is deadly, especially when the body is already weakened.


It is unknown, maybe, and glucose jumped up too.


Enterococci found by the analysis from June 3, 2016, administrated Dr. LaChance.


Later printout of the same analysis' report (the test was administrated by Dr. LaChance) - see above.


It is clearly specified what antibiotics are effective against the found bacterium. There is no Septra antibiotic among them. Having received this result, Dr. LaChance had to renominate an antibiotic (to replace Septra by another antibiotic), but he did not do it... (In the bottom of the page it is written in French: "vue par medecin", and it means that Dr. Martin LaChance saw this list of antibiotics for choice. What, in that case, prevented him to replace Septra by another antibiotic?


It is also very important that the analysis found enterococci in spite of the fact that I already began to take Septra antibiotic, and it proves that Septra was useless against this bacterium.


It was already the 5-th analysis connected with medical institutions outside the hospitals affiliated with 2 largest Montreal universities, and the sample arrived not from one of Montreal Hospitals' laboratories, but from an alternative network of clinics. Whether it is strange that all 5 analyses in about 6-7 years (4 were passed outside of Montreal, or administrated by doctors practicing in the suburb) - related to "alternative lines" - "got to ten" (found both infection and its activator), but dozens of analyses in Montreal Hospitals' laboratories since 2001: NEVER (despite all symptoms of an acute infection; positive tests of "litmus papers" [urinalysis lipstick] in doctors' offices; biochemical indicators associated with an acute urological infection; etc.)?


Isn't it not a conclusive proof of deliberate systematic sabotage: besides the loss of many of the analyses' reports?


Meanwhile, Septra antibiotic gave really serious side effects: heartbeat (tachycardia) and heart rhythm dysfunction; auditory and visual hallucinations; sleep disorder; headaches; blood pressure jumping up of to 160х95; and other symptoms, which were so menacing that it was necessary to stop it immediately.


June 4, 2016.

The schedule of the consecutive medical exams as though speaks positively for decreasing of bladder stones' sizes, or that these stones already underwent some processing that could break up gradually. (Such an assumption could speak confirmatively for lack of stones BEFORE cystoscopy).


June 6, 2016.

On June 6, 2016, at 14:00, I was by my former, non-Montreal urologist (Dr. El-Hakim), with the emergency visit again.


He administrated laboratory analyses, and on 1 more test.


When I described my deepening depression, and asked for help, though he is only a urologist, not a psychologist or psychiatrist, and not a therapist, he, first, prescribed Ativan (antidepressant), and, secondly, gave me a referral to a famous psychologist.


June 7, 2016, Tuesday.

On June 7, 2016, I had to restart taking the blood pressure controlling pills again, which I had to stop (with breaks) for 6 months, due to blood pressure drop till 90x56, and the blood pressure always kept (all 6 months) about 110х75 (or slightly lower), and pulse - around 61.


But - somewhere from the middle of May, 2016, and especially after taking of 3-4 Septra tablets: the pressure suddenly began to jump up...


Because of the diversion-sabotage act against my computers, my connection to Internet became very limited and restricted.


All my convenient and habitual supportive applications and appliances were destroyed, and at such moment, terrible for me, I was forced to act in extremely inconvenient and unusual conditions.


Even the air conditioner began to work badly (suddenly!), and another one - too huge and heavy - I cannot lift and insert into window without help; and there is nobody to ask.


There is 30 degrees Celsius in the apartment - day and night.


And it is in addition to the fact that 3 months of hell considerably destroyed my health.


Independent complete medical exam and treatment in another country could give an only hope of the long-term health amendment, but - in the conditions of my beggarly existence and absence of serious sponsors - it is unattainable.


June 10, 2016.

On June 10, 2016, I began to take not just "regular" Cipro, but Cipro 1000 XL.


10-day course.


And again - nobody, except of my non-Montreal urologist (Dr. El-Hakim), appointed the correct course. This type and dosage of Cipro (at least - for a while) helped.


If not this doctor, the infection would ruin kidneys finally, and also all other urological bodies.


Meanwhile, the depression took its "final shape", inflicting suffering exceeding everything, that happened to be experienced before. This dense, deep depression became a bigger torture than all physical sufferings survived by me because of the obstinacy of Dr. Morris and brutal acts of other doctors that did irreparable harm to my health.


June 13, 2016.

On June 13, 2016, I underwent the preoperational testing in LakeShore Hospital (same preoperational exams as in St.-Mary's Hospital, before the cancellation of operation by Dr. Morris). This time - in Lakeshore Hospital. (The rendezvous was appointed at 8:15).


It was told that the operation will take place in the nearest future.


Unlike St.-Mary's Hospital, which has thousands times more opportunities and resources, this small (to Montreal measures) Lakeshore Hospital is enduring a real crisis; it is overcrowded, and its opportunities are extremely limited. And, nevertheless, THIS hospital found an opportunity to organize an operation in a month after the patient signed the consent papers, whereas the hospital with absolutely other opportunities and resources appointed an URGENT operation in 2 months though it was obvious that - after cystoscopy's infection of stones - the operation became already not just urgent, but alarmingly urgent.


In the beginning of April, I called St.-Mary's Hospital's preoperative office (room G-300), and told everything in details: about what happened after cystoscopy; about my address to the emergency department of Verdun hospital; and about my emergency situation of ongoing acute urological infection; about kidney pains and about the laboratory analysis in ER, which showed creatinine at the level of 66 - instead of my usual 80.


In my phone conversations with Dr. Morris's secretary (till April 15, 2016) - I, among other things, was interested why the urgent (in my situation) operation was appointed only to the second half of May, and asked, why it was not renominated to a closer date, because this situation led me to address to Verdun hospital.


After my address to Royal Victoria Hospital's emergency department, the need to quicken the operation became already shouting, but doctors and medical bureaucrats just closed eyes to it, ignoring all human norms, medical ethics, and even criminal liability.


There is no doubt that Dr. Morris, who was zealously tracing in my integrated file in the Sante Quebec all my addresses to other doctors and in medical institutions (and was also informed by the emergency department of Royal Victoria Hospital), was aware of everything that happens to me, but did nothing to bring closer the date of operation.


They were perfectly informed on everything that happened with me in St.-Mary's preoperative office, but undertook nothing, or could not undertake anything to bring closer the date of operation.


And, at last, on May 3, 2016, when I had exams, tests, and an interview in the preoperative office of St. Mary's Hospital, I again retold about everything in details to Dr. Segal, who already had to know about everything, but this - again - did not modify the date of operation in any way. Moreover, Dr. Segal prescribed antibiotics - concerning an acute urological infection - not only in connection with my complaints and symptoms, but - probable - also because, perhaps, already received the preliminary result of laboratory analyses confirming the presence of infection on the sum of abnormal indexes. And even it does not exhaust all nuances, because I brought and handed to Dr. Segal the copy of the result of the last analysis, where (in the conclusion) it was told "a urological infection", and its activator, a concrete microorganism, was specified.


An article in CU-Media newspaper (beginning of 2016), in which it is told about the staggering situation in Lakeshore hospital.


And, still, it is impossible to call the situation with terms of my operation in Lakeshore Hospital normal.


Even regarding the crisis described in the newspaper, it is necessary to distinguish between routine medical procedures and usual course of medical care - and emergency medical services, when patient's life, or prevention of irreversible serious consequences for his health, which lead to further life-threatening complications and to disabilities, is on stake, depending on speed of surgical or other medical intervention.


In my diary's notes in April-May, I already previsioned governmental circles' and medical bureaucrats' attempt to kill me by delaying the litholopaxy operation forever, i.e. by sabotaging the surgery for an infinitive time.


I was registered on the waiting list for operation in this hospital, when the catastrophe of the ongoing urological infection; the contamination of bladder uric stones by cystoscopy; the situation provoking a morbid depression (which threatened to make it irreversible): already burst, and when it became already clear that the further delay of the necessary operation even for a week will inevitably lead to a bigger damage of kidneys and other urological bodies, and to irreversible damage to my health in general.


I do not know, what particularly was obliged to do this hospital in my specific case (maybe, to arrange a surgery within another hospital?), but I am sure that the existing protocols must provide administrative and medical procedures for such urgent emergencies. Especially, in such a comparatively civilized and humane country as Canada.


There is no doubt that not only actions of Dr. Morris and the medical personnel of emergency departments of St. Mary's, Verdun, and Royal Victoria Hospitals (including doctors) caused irreversible damage to my health, but also (inadmissible in civilized societies) criminally protracted-deter emergency surgery that finally completed the ruining of my health.


This happens because bad people are aspiring to punish me for me resistance to the cruelty of the transformed medical system, which undergoes transformation from an altruistic-humanitarian mission to a dictatorial punitive tool.


And, after all, I do not reproach with anything the Lakeshore Hospital, which, probably, had to comply with the orders of "bad guys". I entirely lay the blame for what happened to me on the St.-Mary's Hospital and personally on Dr. Morris, because - obviously - the urgent operation was already postponed (since March 2016) for 2 months, and, especially, that I was a long-term patient of this hospital (St. Mary's), and, especially, that this hospital has much more opportunities, and because the Lakeshore Hospital had to rake that other hospital (and Dr. Morris working there) did, and for many other reasons...


June 15, 2016.

On June 15, 2016, I made one more control ultrasonography for my own money - in the radiology-"laboratory" - VM-MED.


The black male technician was top-class, very diligent and responsible.


But the interpretation of this ultrasound and its report filling up was done by someone, who became skilled in concealment and falsification to please the authorities and medical cooperative solidarity. (This is my immediate personal opinion, which might be incorrect, or might be revised with time; but I give my considerations below anyway).


On many different examples, I was convinced that this and other private radiology are engaged in "austerity" and "economy of resources", underestimating health problems of needy and underprivileged people, and closing an access for them to medical care, being involved in concealment and distortion of medical data to please the various interested parties (as well as for the banal reason of money extortion). (See the report below)


The result of ultrasonography (June 15, 2016).


The mention of "4 stones" (as was in Dr. Morris's cystoscopy report), perhaps, in favor of confirmation of the version of Dr. Morris, causes suspicion that this version was specially read for employees of this radiology, and set for them as a task to confirm this number.


Such version was simply necessary also for justification of the "blindness" of the ultrasound of February 3, 2016, and the computer tomography, which, for absolutely unknown reasons, did "not see" calculi at first in general, and then their approximate size and quantity.


The same concerns also the deliberate misinterpretation of the sizes of stones, which this report of this ultrasound (from June 15, 2016) determined as 1.4 mm, 1.3, 1.0 and 9 mm.


Thereby, amazing "errors" of the very first (February) ultrasound (2016), computer tomography (March), and Dr. Morris's cystoscopy (whereas cystoscopy does not be mistaken at all) becomes covered and comes true.


At the same time, the most authoritative and professional ultrasound (April 27, 2016) among all others (from January to July, 2016) reported about 3 stones, with sizes of 1.1, 1.3, and 2.2 mm (the litholopaxy operation confirmed this later: both sizes of stones, and their number).


The same confirms also the ultrasound of May 29, 2016, done in another radiology, where, at least, 2 stones were reported - defined as 1.1 and 1.8 mm (that is the closest finding to the data of ultrasonography of April 27, 2016).


Even more suspiciously sounds the mention of a "cluster" of stones (that was not confirmed during the operation) though the previous ultrasound "saw" stones in "free floating". If, according to ultrasound's report (June 15, 2016), all "4 stones" make up one "cluster": how then their number and sizes were defined?


All these absolutely inexplicable, "mysterious" contradictions cannot but frighten, strengthening panic and depression, and played a role in the general deterioration in my physical and mental health.


June 16, 2016.

Meanwhile, there is still no date of litholopaxy operation with Dr. El-Hakim, and I am in the emergency situation permanently.


(Besides other problems, and, in particular, heart problems, my body can cease to accept Cipro at any time, and then - it is the end, or the doctor will not be able to prescribe this antibiotic any more. I had only 4 days until the end of the current course, and more tablets are not present again).


On June 16, 2016, I received a call from the Lakeshore Hospital, and they reported that the operation will probably be performed next Monday, early in the morning (June 20, 2016). It was - in addition - also told that, if, on Monday, till 7 in the morning, nobody calls me, and will not confirm it, so the operation will not take place. (Nobody called on June 20. I had to call twice myself, but the operation date was not confirmed on June 20).


Meanwhile, one of the complications from side effects (and their consequences) from Septra antibiotic - trouble breathing - do not pass. I cannot define whether they are connected with pulmonary, neurologic, or with the cardiovascular nature, and, in particular, with heart problems. While the heart works normally, it is still possible to fight...


June 17, 2016.

Since the episode of serious side effects from Septra antibiotic, the symptoms (heartache, heart problems (arrhythmia, tachycardia), shortage of air and trouble breathing, cardiac pains at physical activities amplifying at a deep breath, and others cardiovascular symptoms) - did not pass. And here, on Friday, June 17, 2016, I addressed to St.-Mary Hospital's emergency department with a suggested heart attack.


I had to go again to this hospital, in which so many provocations and troubles were arranged against me, and so many physical and psychological suffering were inflicted: because I was actually declared "persona non grata" in other hospitals.


After a number of very weird events in St.-Mary"s Hospital, I would like not to address to St.-Mary's any more. However, I have been actually declared "person non-grata" in other hospitals, because, allegedly [according to the medical staff's declarations], I should address only in St.-Mary"s. That oppressive persecution was linked to Dr. Morris, who managed to trigger sanctions against me in medical institutions. When I went to Royal Victoria and MGH Emergency Rooms, they told me that I "must" go "to the hospital where Dr. Morris works". So, I was forced to address to the hospital, in which I faced so many provocations and troubles that have caused so many physical and psychological sufferings.


The emergency department doctor has not managed to detect, what's wrong, but has - at least - carried out all basic tests (blood-urine tests, electrocardiogram and heart"s X-ray, the test on troponin and d-dimer).


I do not stop on details here, because, in my opinion, this doctor did everything he could in the given situation, having ordered the test on troponin and other exams' elements (blood"s coagulation, glucose, red blood cells, etc.). Not the doctor, but, rather, the hospital"s policy is responsible for the fact that, with so many abnormal results (reflected by tests) they did not appoint any follow-ups with medical specialists.


And - secondly: it is amazing, how freely and in different ways this hospital (and its laboratory) - and other hospitals - are interpreting the indicators of laboratory tests.


Should there be the same norm - at least - in Montreal (not speaking about all-Quebec and all-Canadian norms)?


For example, the Creatinine (Glomeral Filters Rate - the test for kidneys function) - is interpreted in different documents differently. The same laboratory (or laboratories of different hospitals) presents its norm one time as 90-150, another time as 89-125. This particular time the norm was given as 44-123 though it is well known that the indicator 44 is a severe kidneys disease: nephritic insufficiency.


The same concerns the test for sugar (glucose).


In one laboratory's documents the norm of glucose is indicated as 5.6, in others as 5.9, or sometimes - as 6.4, and in one of my tests - even 7. (It concerns the same "fasting glucose" indicator.) Therefore, also the borderline (especially for me, in comparison with my other tests) the Creatinine indicator, and a borderline indicator of glucose (at the most top limit) in this report are given in such a way, as though it "should be the norm".


Trying not to sound unfounded, I give (see below) an example of some of "normal" - responsible - references to the norm (see below):


As we see - in this case - the norm of Creatinine is given as 80-120.

If there were "flags" "H" --- "L" in the printout (of the laboratory report) from June 17, 2016 (St.-Mary"s ER), the doctor would, probably, has paid more attention to them, as well as to a deviation from the norm concerning the thrombotsites, blood coagulation, etc.

The blood test alone indicated unusual to me (in comparison with the majority of other results) abnormals, which was signaling about some systemic failure, an acute process.


Now, let's look into cardiograms, which detected significant changes (worsening, in comparison with the norm), which never occurred before and represented a fresh shift to pathology, certainly, caused by the urological drama and all its side effects, and, thus, directly connected to Dr. Morris's (and other doctors') medical crimes.


See the comparison of 2 cardiograms below:


Comparison of 2 cardiograms: June 17, 2016 (in the emergency department) - above; and of May 3, 2016 (under it).


It is shocking that the name of the doctor, who appointed the cardiogram, "was lost" - and was not specified.


The policy of concealment and incompetence of doctors leads to their full irresponsibility and to lack of any control.


In this chronicle (in the records of my address to this ER), I described the discrepancy of doctors' names on their breast cards in St. Mary Hospital's emergency department - with the names specified in official reports; I reported about the substitution of names of some doctors by the names of other doctors, etc.


As the new, changed tactics of concealment and cover up of systematic medical crimes (since 2016), other tricks began to be applied already: names of the doctors examining patients during their address to ER "vanish" from the official documents. But anonymity of doctors - the same that anonymity of bandits, who are active under their gangster nicknames.


Blood test from June 17, 2016, revealed some abnormalities in blood clotting formula (bad blood clotting) and showed that the red blood cells are lower than the norm (anemia or other reasons). It is also necessary to pay attention to such indexes as glucose and creatinine.


The blood test (June 17, 2016, Sr. Mary Hospital's Emergency Department).


The blood test from June 17, 2016: abnormal coagulation and other hematological indexes, which never were noted before. Abnormal (high) PT, INR blood coagulation; HCT ht (hemocrit); low red cells (anemia). Low creatinine (suppressed kidney function); borderline (pre-diabetic) glucose.


The combination of the blood test, which found abnormalities on very important indicators, and the cardiogram, which showed a sudden deterioration in comparison with all previous (always normal in the past) cardiograms (including 2 previous cardiograms in the same St.-Mary's Hospital; however, the comparison is absent in the present cardiogram report) - had to dictate the need for additional exams, consultations with experts, and follow ups; but no further medical actions followed. It was, probably, a more serious violation than a simple negligence.


CHAPTER 8. 20 June 2016.


JUNE 20, 2016, MONDAY.

On June 20, 2016, I sent the next letter to Canadian Federal, and to Quebec's Ministers of Health:


To the Minister of Health.

CC: To dr. Ivan Rohan (tel. 514-731-3249); to: fax: 514-731-0395 /

From: Lev Gunin [patient] (tel.(......)


[This is a very urgent appeal, which requires an immediate practical response within 2-3 days, before it becomes too late.]


Dear Honorable Minister of Health!

Dear Doctor Rohan!

Operating decades in the medical field you must have connections, authority and reputation, and you know, which strings to pull. Please, help me, save my life!

4 months I am waiting for bladder stones removal surgery, experiencing tremendous suffering from life-threatening Enterococci infection. Without the stones" removal bacteria can not be defeated, and will recurrently attack (and, finally, destroy) the vital organs.

Twice during that period, I had experienced urine retention and other severe consequences of the prostatic infection. During that period, the acute infection recurred 6 or 7 times, with all the horrible consequences, like unbearable itching and burning, chills, fever, pain, extreme fatigue, trouble to pass urine, gross bleeding, etc. During that period of time, the blood tests have revealed infection-inflicted short or longer-term shifts in biochemistry, hematology, and other components (19.000 leucocytes, low hemoglobin, erythrocytes, etc.). During that period, I was forced to more then 20 urgent visits to medical labs, CLSC"s, walk-in clinics, Emergency rooms, doctors" offices, and other medical institutions, with all the hardship of long waiting hours, inconveniency, transportation in my pitiful condition, stressful need to explain my situation and condition over and over, uncertainty about getting or not getting help, and the misery of the corridors and waiting rooms.

To get a new course of antibiotics, or an extension of a current one, I must each time wait for the next infection"s outbreak, which (as I guess) can then justify a prescription. Those breaks between different courses of antibiotics destroy my health and bring real torture, while Ciprofloxacin, being an emergency necessity, is also destroying my health in turn, simultaneously increasing bacteria"s resistance. At any moment Cipro may stop working, and (or) infection may get to the kidney, and this is the end. The only solution is an immediate emergency bladder stones removal that can prevent a lethal outcome. Presently, without any Cipro pills again, I may not survive next infection"s outbreak.

I do not want to comment an issue of the scheduled for May 16, 2016 (at St-Mary"s Hospital) stones removal surgery"s cancellation. Considering dramatic unusual circumstances, which surrounded this cancellation, it wasn"t my fault. Besides, a matter of compassion and medical obligation to save human life demands to step over this past event, taking into consideration only the current need and urgency.

I believe that my current urologist-surgeon is doing everything he can to speed up the surgery. It is suggestible that the small Lakeshore Hospital is also doing enough to speed up the stones removal operation, but its resources may be limited, and the solution can be found on a higher level.


Please, help me, or, at least, readdress my appeal to a right destination.

[The Enterococci bacteria may be contagious, and pose a danger to other people, first of all, to my family members, already hardly suffering from my miserable situation.]


Yours truly,

Lev Gunin.

Montreal, June 20, 2016.


This message was never answered.


Concerning other data sources about this particular period, there some lacking information that was lost.


My records in the computer *.rtf format have been corrupted, and this corrupted file began to show abracadabra in many places.


My memory after June 21, 2016, has weakened, and also does not throw any additional light on those events. It is concerning the question if it was possible to visit my family doctor on June 20, 2016.


It is specified in my records that at the end of June 2016, I have visited the office of my family doctor, and asked him (after my address to ER on 17 Jun. 2016) to refer me for an urgent echocardiogram, but it is unclear, whether it happened on June 20, 2016.


After my address to ER on June 17, 2016 (Friday) followed 2 weekend days, - and this became a tragic factor: because I could not address neither to a walk-in clinic, nor to my family doctor.


(I did not know by then that some of the walk-in clinics are working even on Saturdays).


However, if I visited my family doctor on June 20, 2016, with a request about the echocardiogram (which he has refused): this refusal keeps within in a row of other refusals (running forward: echocardiogram, demanded by me during 15 years, was never issued).


At the same time, it is possible to consider a number of other medical refusals, which have led to a probable micro-stroke (June 21, 2016): as one of its factors.


JUNE 21, 2016, TUESDAY.

On June 21, 2016, I came to St.-Mary"s Emergency Room with such symptoms, as confusion and the loss of orientation; short-term nasal bleeding; headache and improbably strong (maximal) vertigo; sharp hearing"s loss; difficulty of understanding human speech and to distinct the words and syllables; etc.


(The noise-hiss in the ears, vanishing for long periods before, returned, and - after June 21, 2016 - became permanent).


Hardly notable dizziness happened few times after June 2, 2016 - as one of the complications from Septra"s (antibiotic) side effects, but, first, they quickly and completely vanished, and, secondly, this condition was more likely not a real dizziness, but a micro-second shaking, a shake-up, or a physical instability of balance.


In the late afternoon (Tuesday, June 21, 2016), standing in our salon (hall) before the window, I have suddenly felt at first an easy indisposition, and then more and more obvious signs of something unusual. Though the window was completely closed (the air conditioner was cooling the room), I have felt airflow - as if a breeze was literally passing through the windowpane (as if there was no barrier before me).


[In the same time, music from FM-radio (stationary Quest amplifier-FM-Radio) was interrupted by the disturbances and replaced by noise for approximately 5-7 seconds.]


Right there, I felt something like a push: like a pressure from within, from outside (from the street), and everything has begun to spin at once in my eyes.


It became difficult to breathe, and droplets of cold sweat (with, simultaneously, few droplets of blood from the nose) have appeared on my forehead.


The world around me begun to spin so wildly that I had to fall on 4 points to support myself.


As soon as I managed to crawl away from the window, I started to feel a bit better, and have lain down, but right there felt absolutely badly: my feet did not obey me; the tongue was braided; there was whistle and noise in my ears; the sounds reached me as through a pillow; I hardly distinguished human speech; in parallel - there developed the same strongest vertigo as in case of January 7, 2013, when I had a similar attack, in the same way - when I stood and sat before the same window...


By then, it happened exactly at midday (at 12.00), and it was exactly on the day of Orthodox Christmas of 2013 (the figure "13"), and everything was almost the same, except for lack of 2 or 3 symptoms, which were present now, on June 20 and 21, 2016.


[It is necessary to add that the dizziness has never occurred - till November 3, 2005 (my birthday!), when a similar incident took place, and then before a similar incident on January 7, 2013 (Orthodox Christmas!), and then till June 21, 2016, (Hitler"s Germany attacked USSR on that date!): for only one exception.


Strange disturbance of balance (accompanied by a feeling of pressure upon the face or on the nape, ringing in the ears, short-term sharp decrease in hearing, and by other symptoms) - happened several times during my walks with my friend Yu.

On August 1, 2009; June 1, 2010; August 1, 2010; June 1, 2011; July 1, 2012 - short-term dizziness, weakness, ringing in the ears, sight and hearing disturbances.

(On arrival home: a normal blood pressure (120 х 78); I was drinking enough water before the walk).

On July 2, 2012 (after yesterday's walk with Yu.): a nasal bleeding (repeated till July 4, 2012: 4 or 5 times); plentiful hematuria accompanied by bladder"s gripe (mulligrubs), with a bright red blood. On the same day: enterogastric bleeding with the same scarlet blood.]


Approximately, at 19:00, on June 21, 2016, my wife has brought me to St.-Mary's Emergency Room, and, having stayed with me some time (she has accompanied me to the office of the triage nurse, and was there with me all the time), later left (returned home) in connection with some urgent circumstances. By the time of my spouse"s departure, the vertigo has become not so terrible, and I could move around (somehow), clinging and holding up at everything that could get under my hand on my way, but still with a great risk to fall and to injure myself.


When my wife has taken me to the triage office (by then, I still could not make a step without her support; everything was still spinning in a wild speed before my eyes as though I stood on a carousel), the triage nurse has chosen a rough, aggressive, accusatory tone from her first word. It was remaining a riddle: what my fault or an oversight consisted of; probably, only that I am still alive.


Though I noticed not much in my pitiful condition of that time, it seemed to me that she wrote down almost nothing from my words. This triage nurse tried to convince me (and my wife) that my unique problem consists in the nerves, and that I have (allegedly) a psychiatric problem, that's all; though she is not a doctor-psychiatrist, and had no right to declare "diagnoses" and insinuations.


It was abundantly clear that she was instructed in advance (before I came to ER) and ordered to behave with me exactly so and to carry out exactly such a line, - or she knew very well, who I am, and what conflicts with medics I had, and, not excluded, it was specified something very specific about me in my medical file that provoked her and allowed her to be so defiantly with me.


When I replied to her that the only thing that can be indirectly related to the sphere of "nerves": is a possible damage at the level of the central nervous system - as a result of a short-term ischemia, micro-stroke, or something similar (certainly, I meant under the damage of the central nervous system the traumatic injury of brain), she suddenly began to shout at me, became even more accusatory and offensive, as though having mentioned the central nervous system I have committed a serious crime. Such a behavior of the triage nurse did not foretell anything good.


But, before we left her office, she once again literally scoffed at me like a predator as though she was ready to kill me, or, at least, to slap me in the face. Whether it is surprising that I - a patient with a suspected stroke! - who needed an IMMEDIATE medical assessment - was kept 4 hours for a call to a doctor"s office (up to 23:00) though there were not so many patients that evening in ER, and 4 doctors (as minimum) were on duty?


When I have waited to be called to a doctor, the dizziness was still there, unlike a similar vertigo on January 7, 2013: when it - after the attack - has instantly stopped. To reach the doctor's room without someone's help was a difficult task. I could fall several times, and could injure myself.


I was examined by Dr. John P. Rowen. He did not want to listen to what happened (at all), instead indirectly accusing me for turning to Emergency Room "without a reason". He kept himself within the legal (permitted) borders, behaving not like the triage nurse, who attacked me for no reason almost by her fists (in other words: without explaining or justifying her aggressiveness), but his attitude was not less cruel and brutal.


I did not open my mouth yet and did not pronounced a word as Dr. Rowen already have declared that does not see any health problem - "absolutely nothing" (meaning that there is no problem, which needs a medical attention). He declared it BEFORE assessing me and without listening to my explanations (to my reasoning - why I am here); without having ordered any laboratory tests; without having checked my pulse; without having checked me on symptoms of a possible micro-stroke (and other probable scenarios), and added that I should go home, and not come any more to the Emergency Room "without a reason".


His words have literally taken away from me a speech power.


I told him that I have difficulty breathing, noise (and ringing) in my ears (which never happened before [a high sound appeared, vanished, came back from time to time before today, but the noise and hiss, and a combination of noise-ringing have never manifested before]), and a sharp decline of the hearing; that couple of hours ago I had an unbelievably strong vertigo and vomiting, and that the dizziness is stile pending now so that if I do not support myself holding the walls - I will fall; that every minute it becomes dark in my eyes; that after today"s vertigo and the sickness attack it became difficult to distinguish the syllables and whole fragments of human speech; that right after the beginning of feeling sick I almost did not feel the touches to my hands.


I added that the last cardiogram (3 May 2016) (i.e. quite recently) has shown a deviation from the norm, which never happened before in my life, etc.


I have added also that, as a result of the side effects from Septra-antibiotic (at the beginning of this June), the episodes of unusually strong palpitation followed, and that - on June 17, 2016, - I came to this Emergency Room with a suspected cardiac seizure, and this, in turn, increases a probability of an emergence of brain"s problems of vascular character.


I have not forgotten to tell also about the temperature (37 and 5 in the triage nurse"s office; 37 and 9 at home, before the departure to the hospital).


He has listened to my tirade, and asked, when has begun my present condition (at what time). I have answered that I began to feel sick (the vertigo followed then) - approximately at 16:00 or 17:00.


Then Dr. Rowen asked: what I want from him.


I replied that I demand at least all basic laboratory tests, tests for micro-stroke, short brain ischemia or a brain trauma, CT-scan (computerized tomography), and to check the carotid arteries and eyes - whether there are no signs of a traumatic damage: an abnormal intraocular pressure, a close angle syndrome, etc.; and also to examine the ears and the vestibular apparatus.


Dr. Rowen immediately attacked me for "hypochondria" (suspiciousness), angrily refused any examinations, and has declared that I do not have anything serious, except for a panic and a depression syndrome, and that he will prescribe a medicine, which "will help for all problems".


He then has written out the prescription.


However, I have told to him that even 10 years ago it was already well known that the depression increases the risk of a stroke on the average by 70 percent; that the deeper is a depression, the risk is higher. And I had specified to him that the panic syndrome and a depression do not explain headache, abnormal temperature (38 at home; 37,5 in the triage room), strongest vertigo (now replaced by a less critical dizziness), eye pains when looking at light, and other symptoms, and continued to insist on brain"s MRI or CT-scan; but Dr. Rowen responded that now, allegedly, it is necessary to wait till 8 a.m. to do the scan, but, if I want - I can come the day after tomorrow at 9:00 for CT-scan.


Seeing that he is not going to issue any medical requisition, I have reminded him that no one will do a CT-scan without a requisition from a doctor. Dr. Rowen answered that I simply should address in the reception window (without going to triage), and that "there they will be already informed". But I did not give up, and insisted on requisition, or - at least - on blood test (saying what components should be checked).


At this moment, Dr. Rowen has shown his real shark nature, threw off his mask, and said that I must leave the room immediately, and began to push me to the doorway.


I said in reply that I am no able to walk because of the dizziness, and that I am just about to fall.


He did not want to listen, has painfully taken me by the elbow, intending to throw me out from the office. During this moment, the dizziness became stronger, everything begun to spin around me, and I would fall, if have not grasped the edge of the medical couch. Everything has rotated with a wild speed again, and I was helplessly stretched on the floor, having caught the couch like an anchor. Then this moral freak has literally stepped me over - and left the office.


After pair of seconds he has returned, and nevertheless has pushed me out from the office.


When I, reeling, trudged on the corridor to the waiting room (where my wife should come for me), I only by miracle have not fallen and have not broken my bones. Supported by my wife, I have reached the car with enormous difficulties. Only the next day the dizziness has passed, but the headache and some other painful symptoms kept 2 more weeks.


Of course, Dr. Rowen had absolutely no basis to dump everything on "panic syndrome" and "depression", except of the information in my Sante Quebec file about the prescription of Ativan by my present urologist, which he used as a solely catch for the justification of a COMPLETE refusal of medical care.


Putting it differently, Dr. Rowen did not have and could not have any own medical opinion for:

1) the reasons, which have caused my condition;

2) its danger to my life and health;

3) the validity of the suspicions on brain damage (ischemia, stroke, etc.);

4) the presence of depression or "panic syndrome" (he even did not examine me and did not talk to me, declaring - figuratively speaking - from the entrance: that I should go home and not come here any more "without a reason");

5) the roles of depression or "panic syndrome" in my condition, and Ativan's ability to change anything;

6) consequences of his own behavior, his refusal for any diagnostics and medical care in general, and complications due to the absence of rehabilitation - in case if it is a stroke or a micro-stroke.


He was not concerned about his patient's well-being at all, but the only thing that worried Dr. Rowen during that moment: it was that the patient has already addressed to the same Emergency Room 4 days ago (the other doctor have not rendered any medical care by then though has carried out quite reasonable troubleshooting tests, but, however, has not finished them and has ignored abnormal laboratory results, patient"s complaints, and the absence of a clarification of the reasons of his patient"s condition (heart attack). Now - if it would become clear that the patient had any brain damage (for example, a micro-stroke) - the hospital and the doctors could have serious troubles.


So - no other motivations and intentions were on Dr. Rowen's mind, except of a cover-up and framing of his colleagues and the hospital during that moment.


Dr. Rowen, certainly, argued so (in his mind): even if the next day this patient will be taken by an Ambulance to a hospital with further developments of a stroke, and will die - then other doctors (such as himself) will begin to screen (to cover-up) him, their colleague (Der Genosse), in the same way, as he screens the others.


Then - to dump everything on depression and to secure himself by prescribing Ativan (to show that he, allegedly, did at least something), and by a pseudo-appointment (deception apropos the CT-scan) - he employed just a dirty trick.


But there is one, how to put it, non-joining.


During my conversation with Dr. Rowen, I have confirmed (answering his question) that really addressed in the same ER few days ago, but (as briefly as we have discussed this subject) I have managed to give a good feedback about the doctor who assessed me. Was it, in this case, any motive for Dr. Rowe to cover-up his colleague?


2 days after I, still in a serious condition, accompanied by my wife, have somehow reached the hospital, and there it has become clear that there is no record on any tomography. Neither the secretary, nor the triage nurse knew anything. Dr. Rowen has meanly deceived me!


The actions of doctor Rowen have led to the most dramatic consequences. Just at once, having come back home from hospital, I have noticed that it became difficult to swallow (for sometimes after that, I only drank water). This additional symptom kept not less than a week. Then I often choked, when drank, doing more than 2 drinks, and often water or food got to the "windpipe", and I coughed and choked.


After June 21, 2016, I began to distinguish aurally badly some syllabic combinations, and, in general, my hearing has sharply degraded. I have ceased to understand a fluent speech. My own speech has become tongue-tied. It became difficult to concentrate on the readable content, especially with the abstract, complicated sense. I have ceased to understand the philosophical idioms, even my beloved sayings of thinkers. I have ceased to understand my favorite philosophers, including Schopenhauer, Heidegger, and Plato. Having reached till the end of philosophical thought, I did not remember any more what was in the beginning. Even my own philosophical works have become for me rebuses. The headaches, which were very seldom in me before, began to attack me every week. The nape and the temples were especially hurt.


In some days, in the last dates of June 2016, I have suddenly noticed that began to forget many even simplest words, and that my memory in general has sharply degraded. This problem began to progress more and more. I began to forget not only words and phrases, but also, for example, where I have put this or that thing, whether I have put the food in the refrigerator, etc.


My vision (which was periodically worsening, improving, and in summer of 2016 - till June 21 - much improved) has sharply degraded, especially the distant sight. Letters began to blur in 10-15 minutes of reading; eyes began to be tired and teary; floating objects have multiplied. Since June 21, 2016, the lacks of coordination of movements appeared and did not disappear; the coordination of movements did not settle into the norm, and it had nothing in common with any panic syndrome or depression.


Some days after June 21, 2016, I could not look at bright light sources.


Before 21 of June 2016, I was capable to type a text on computer keyboard, and, simultaneously, continue a conversation; listen to radio news - and read a book (at the same time); do programming in Visual Basics - and listen to an audio book. But after 21 June 2016, I discovered that I am no longer capable to sort computer files - and, simultaneously, listen to radio news; or combine simple processing of images with the simplest conversation.


Problems with breathing did not stop up to the end of August 2016, though - from time to time - as though disappeared (for example, during the time of passing of the preoperative evaluation in Lakeshore hospital). They could be connected not to psychological tension or depression (as Dr. Rowen argued), but to some damage to brain parts, which are responsible for normal breath function.


[After publishing 1-st Russian version of this chronicles [describing medical crimes] (approximately, the end of 2017 - beginning of 2019; 3 web-sites, including Maxim Mashkov and Sergei Balandin web sites), and reading over the 1-st English translation (done by my friends approximately in the end of 2019), I dig into Dr. John Patrick Rowen"s professional medical activity and spheres of interests, finding the next information.

Dr. Rowen is known as a vascular surgeon / phlebologist, who operates at Xomed Esthetics, Côte-des-Neiges (5056 Chemin de la Côte-des-Neiges, Montréal, QC H3V 1G6, tel. (514) 342-8346); Rosemère (30, boul. Bouthillier, suite 250 Rosemère, Québec, J7A 4B4); Westmount (4484, Sherbrooke West, suite 200, Westmount, Québec H3Z 1E6).

In his self-advertisement, is written:

"As a dedicated vascular surgeon/phlebologist, he specializes in the diagnosis, medical management, or surgical treatment of individuals who are suffering from diseases related to the blood vessels outside the brain and heart. He determines the types of instruments and surgical methods that will be most applicable in achieving the desired output. He also reviews the history of a patient to confirm the need for surgery.

Specialized skills in the field of medicine are very valuable these days. With the help of a vascular surgeon or a phlebologist, patients who are dealing with issues associated with the blood vessels are assisted. Among the conditions and diseases that impact the vascular system include coronary heart disease, deep vein thrombosis, arteriosclerosis, and pulmonary embolism. Surgical procedures may be implemented in order to repair damaged veins and arteries, removing blockages within these parts.

Dr. John P. Rowen is currently accepting new patients. To book an appointment, please call (514) 342-8346."


Thus, as 99 per cent of doctors, involved in deeply unethical actions IN MY CASE, Dr. Rowen is a medical businessman (entrepreneur), whose medical activity is an unseparable hybrid with money-hunting.


A bit later, I found out that Dr. Rowen was referred to as President, who literary OWNS the clinics: "Dr. John Rowen"s clinics: The Montreal and Rosemere clinics".


His BiO describe Dr. Rowen as a family doctor (in the début of his medical career (a familiar picture!):


"Dr. Rowen grew up in Montreal and was educated in French. He is completely bilingual and speaks some Italian and Spanish as well. He graduated from Queen"s University in Ontario in 1989 and completed his residency training at McGill University in 1992.

Being both an emergency physician and family doctor for 26 years, Dr. Rowen understands the needs of his patients. He has a very practical approach and a true passion for creating results for his patients.

Dr. Rowen has been practicing Phlebology and Esthetic Medicine since 2000. He has been trained by some of the best leaders in the world. He is passionate about learning and attends numerous scientific meetings per year to bring the most up-to-date treatments to his patients.

He is a Fellow of the Canadian Society of Phlebology, member of the American College of Phlebology as well as the Canadian Association of Aesthetic Medicine.

Dr. Rowen founded XO MED Esthetic in 2006. His approach is a culmination of his specialties, beliefs and passions, which sums up in providing the best state-of-the-art treatments in medical facial aesthetics and varicose vein care.

Dr. Rowen is invited to meetings all over the world where leaders in the field discuss advanced techniques. He also has a passion for anatomy and has even participated in cadaver courses, and read countless books on the subject, to enrich his practice.

"I became interested in Phlebology since I, myself, had varicose veins and was very curious to learn more about the techniques involved in treating them. It fit in well with my passion to see results. Phlebology may seem straightforward, but is harder than it looks and combines both the science and art of medicine. With the availability of better imaging modalities, the specialty has really taken off in the past 10-15 years. I am very pleased to be able to offer this life-changing expertise to my patients." (Dr. John Rowen)


Dr. Rowen wrote a medical article in 2016: A la recherche / We are looking for: By John Rowen; February 18, 2016.


However, his main target is the cosmetology for the rich people, which is reflected in his adds: "Phlebology and Medical Aesthetic clinic. Treatment of varicose veins by sclerotherapy and ultrasound guided treatment. Dermal fillers and Botulinum toxin (Botox Cosmetic) injections".


Since 1992, Dr. Rowen was listed as St.-Mary"s hospital Graphic, ER and family doctor. (Interestingly, Dr. John Lewis (see above, in connection with my 1-st posterior VBD in 2013) was also listed as "Graphic", and owned "Dr. John Lewis Inc. Graphic").


His education and status:

1) McGill University Graphic

2) Emergency Medicine Residency Program

3) Queen's University Graphic (1989 - 1992) Doctor of Medicine (M.D.)

4) American College of Phlebology (ACP) American College of Phlebology (ACP) Graphic.


One of my sources informed that Dr. Rowen might be connected to US Army, which is theoretically possible, considering that "He started his training for phlebology (varicose veins) in 2000 in the USA, and has been treating patients with injectable botox and fillers since 2004.", and that "He also has a passion for anatomy and has even participated in cadaver courses, and read countless books on the subject, to enrich his practice".


This information makes it very suggestible that such a personality as Dr. Rowen could mistreat me on the order of some very influential people for advancing his career.]


There is no doubt that I was assessed (21 Jun. 2016) by Dr. Rowen, and not by another doctor (which could be quite possible in St.-Mary Hospital"s ER - practicing misleading documentation information), because - on his photos - Dr. Rowen (who looks like a South-European or Jewish Ashkenazi man) looks exactly as the person, who abused and mistreated me at St.-Mary"s ER on 21 June 2016. (See below)


Dr. John Patrique Rowen.


After the criminal mistreatment by Dr. John Patrick Rowen, I never fully recovered from a suspected micro-stroke, which was boldly neglected and abusively ignored by Dr. Rowen. The partial recovery took months and years, and was possible only because of my body"s recovery and regenerative qualities, and thanks to my (modest) medical knowledge.


All elements of intellectual and physical degradation (so, the strength of hands has also decreased; I could not, as earlier, to turn off strongly twirled plugs; to hold a heavy bag; etc.) just impossible to list, but most of all I was upset and brought into a despair by the sharp deterioration of my vision and hearing.


My family doctor has arranged an appointment with an ophthalmologist, but - when I called him, I was told to prepare 50 dollars for the visit, which I did not have by then... Then a walk-in clinic had referred me to an ophthalmologist, but that eye clinic has blocked my access to this doctor-ophthalmologist; the correspondence with that eye clinic is given in this chronicle...


Later I have forgotten about these 2 referrals. I began to forget more and more things...


A bit later I could not continue my fight for an access to ophthalmology care in connection with medical bureaucrats" dramatic delay of the 1-st and the 2-nd urological surgery (provoked by the irresponsible actions of Dr. Morris) and the general awful situation (the ordeal with the infected bladder stones, etc.) but now - during a short time - I have absolutely forgotten about these 2 referrals, when was persistently demanding a referral to an ophthalmologist from different doctors, and was urgently needed the ophthalmologic help, remembering nothing about 2 referrals.


Also my fear of going to any Emergency Room - after all humiliations, abuses, inhuman treatments, and misconducts there - played an important role, resulted in the outcome, when an attack of a very strong pain in the left eye has not been stopped by doctors, and all its complications: it, certainly, the consequence of many months of the partial loss of memory, which was (as everything else) provoked by the actions of Dr. John Rowen. And the catastrophe with my vision, which has happened in a year after the June 21, 2016 events: (as everything else) is on Dr. Rowen"s conscience.


Whether it is surprising, that, in response to my appeal to St.-Mary"s medical archive, I received no more than 1 single page (on June 17, 2016) and no more than 2 pages (on June 21, 2016) of non-illegible records on my 2 visits to St.-Mary"s ER! Neither the reception"s registration; nor the triage nurse"s notes; nor the records of the vital functions at the triage nurse"s office (breath, blood pressure, temperature); nor the complete timetable of my visit - have been made available to me.


I have not received also other pages of the standard official report.


If they blocked or destroyed such important documents: it means that the hospital has a lot of medical crimes to hide.


"23:00... 60 y.o. went in vague...

explains

his.... vertigo/cufune(?)...

- no hit -

... thinks - it related

to bladder stones...

why O

OK VII rerle(?) last...

O Xon

thyroid O

rep clu feta

O I'm soft tube"


It is all that was possible to descramble.


Even taking into consideration all the unclear or doubtful words, this very short Dr. Rowen"s description was deliberately made uncertain, not clear, and hey presto, was strip of doctor"s opinion, and leaves an only conclusion that I, allegedly, have connected the "vertigo" (he does not mention any more symptoms, abnormalities (like high temperature and blood pressure), and patient"s complaints, etc.) with "stones in the bladder".


Let's begin with the fact that I did not tell a word about bladder stones to Dr. Rowen, and such a subject was not touched during my conversation with him.


Next day, I have written down everything what was spoken during the conversation with Dr. Rowen, and this account was copied to this chronicle without any changes. I made this report for myself, and it would be ridiculous to assume that I could conceal something from myself, deliberately avoiding mentioning anything.


A day later, I have written absolutely the same to my friends, just "by my own words" (not copying it from my writing), retelling once again what happened during my appearance in St.-Mary"s ER on 21 Jun. 2016.


Each time (describing - what has happened - to another close friend or a relative), I did not copy the text of the previous letter, but has stated retelling anew. The fully identical sense of all these letters according to the semantic contents and on the facts - proves that - in my statement about these events, - I was honest; otherwise, there could be deviations.


Some of these letters (their copies), i.e. the copies of the sent files - have remained: they are in such formats that the forensic experts could confirm their authenticity.


Besides, my friends (as well as I, too) are keeping the copies of our electronic correspondence, and they could send (on my demand) these or those letters: so, the problems with the confirmation of the letters" authenticity should not arise.


However, Dr. Rowen's lie about my alleged suggestion (about vertigo"s link to bladder stones) is not just absolutely ridiculous, but I could not lift this subject at all in principle, because I was so anxious with a probability of a stroke or a micro-stroke that could not speak on any other subjects, except of this, by definition.


Thus, Dr. Rowen could not hear about the bladder stones from me, and - especially - about the alleged dependence between the stones - and vertigo. He could read about the bladder calculi and about the litholopaxy surgery in my Sante Quebec file, or heard something about my conflict with Dr. Morris and about my cancellation of the surgery with Dr. Morris from the latter or from other medical workers in this hospital.


However, it was possible to learn about the same subject under the angle of my statements (that exactly because of Dr. Morris (i.e. because of his medical non-ethical stand, mistrust to patient"s complaints, his refusals of lab tests, antibiotics, and alpha blockers) - the bladder stones have developed in general; then their diagnostics has been artificially delayed; then the stones were infected because of an unnecessary cystoscopy; and, at last, the surgery was postponed - at least - for nearly 3 months; and all this has led not only to urological complications, but also to depression, to many courses of antibiotics and life-threatening infections attacks, to a heart attack, and, here, finally, also to a probable micro-stroke (this is far not everything what happened because Dr. Morris) my health was damaged) - only from my correspondence and from my live communication with my relatives.


In other words, retelling my claims related to the ordeal of lithiasis (and - indirectly - to Dr. Morris) - as responsible for tragic (for me) events, including also the obscure attack that happened on June 21, 2016, - Dr. Rowen could not learn about these reproaches and claims from me, but from someone else, or from other sources.


Having taken - as a basis - such an above-mentioned sense of the "dependence" between the ordeal of lithiasis (i.e. those factors that have provoked an urolithic illness), followed by the sabotage of diagnostics and treatment, - Dr. Rowen has deliberately omitted several subjects in the semantic (logical) row (between vertigo - and stones): to attach a comical, absurd outline to his deceptive-invented statement (submitted as a statement of his patient). The mentioning about, allegedly, raised by his patient subject of bladder stones (especially - in the connection with vertigo) - was an insolent lie, but even more spiteful and meanness lie was Dr. Rowen's drive for inventing absurd statements, characterizing poorly developed mad people, attributing them to a patient with an adequate intellectual development.


But Dr. Rowen has not thought up anything new. The same perfidious, illegal, roguish tricks were already used for discrediting my intellectual potential and my mental health at least twice: in 2007 and 2015: also in the Emergency Rooms - in the hospitals affiliated with McGill university. (Both cases are in details described in this chronicle).


So, Dr. Rowen not just refused to provide medical care for his patient with all signs of a traumatic brain damage or micro-stroke, but also tried to smear, defame, and discredit his patient.


The unfair methods of Dr. Rowen with the omission of the subjects of the logic row are a copy-paste (and equally mean) inventions of two nurses. One nurse (intentionally distorting my account and the chronological sequence of events) has written in her official report "to avoid falling down under the car, I jumped on the trunk", letting out the most important elements of the logical row (2007). She "has "simply" forgotten" to write down that - before I was hit by car"s capote, not trunk (I have not "jumped" on it - as she claimed I, allegedly, said), this car has unexpectedly darted off, and has rushed on me on its maximum starting (for a car with a working motor) speed.


Such a trick with an omission or a shift of the order of events (subjects of logic row) - gives any statements of an exposed to a mockery victim a wild, abnormal sense.


Skilled and trained nurses and doctors are capable to invent and think out phrases, which are very similar to examples from the psychiatry study books where the models of speech of the feeble-minded mad are given.


Another nurse has attributed to me the phrases entirely invented by her ("the police is steeling my urine", etc.). This is not an only pearl from an arsenal of her rich imagination (2015).


It seems that Dr. Rowen is such a low, shameless, impudent, and cynical person that he was in charge of such a mean and dirty work, which is usually given not to doctors, but only to lower medical personnel.


But here is an interesting detail.


Both previous similar cases took place in the connection with the cover-up operations, which goal was to shadow potential criminals: October 2-3, 2007 (the goal was to protect the driver of the car, which hit me, causing serious vascular damage); spring of 2015 (the goal was to protect those, who destroyed the results of my blood-urine tests). By analogy, it is essential to interpret Dr. Rowen"s actions - as the same concealment operation, even at the price of the health or life of the patient.


But who was screened by Dr. Rowen? After all, this time was not neither an attack on me, nor a car accident (incident), etc. On the contrary, I have responded about the doctor, who examined me couple of days ago (in the same ER), very warmly.


Then whom else he could cover-up? Naturally, his fellow colleagues, and, first of all: Dr. Morris. By presenting me as a poorly-developed intellectually, weak-headed person, and, besides, by inventing psychiatric syndromes and prescribing psychiatric drugs (instead of confirming or ruling out - through exams and tests - his patient's self-diagnosis "micro-stroke"), Dr. Rowen aimed to discredit my words about Dr. Morris, i.e. to destroy the confidence about the facts of his colleague's medical crimes.


Asked to commit an action of violence against an "unwanted" patient, and to smear this particular patient for particular reasons, Dr. Rowen was ready to kill me (by refusing the essential medical help), but to whitewash and rehabilitate Dr. Morris!


This is why Dr. Rowen invented that I was, allegedly, speaking about the bladder stones, while, in reality, I said no word about the urolithic illness; this is why he insolently falsified my statements, fabricating all kind of gibberish, which I did not and could not say; this is why he built mountains of scam to connect invented by him phrases to Dr. Morris.


Asked to commit an action of violence against an "unwanted" patient, and to smear this particular patient for particular reasons, Dr. Rowen was ready to kill me (by refusing the essential medical help), but to whitewash and rehabilitate Dr. Morris!


This is why Dr. Rowen invented that I was, allegedly, speaking about the bladder stones, while, in reality, I said no word about the urolithic illness; this is why he insolently falsified my statements, fabricating all kind of gibberish, which I did not and could not say; this is why he built mountains of scam to connect invented by him phrases to Dr. Morris.


However, Dr. Rowen might be also an informer and provocateur, because one of his main goals was to conceal the reason for my address to St. Mary Hospital's ER at this time: brain damage by micro-stroke or by something else (like narrow-directed microwave radiation).


I never told the doctors that I connect 3 suspicious indisposition attacks (with an unprecedented strong vertigo, vomiting, high temperature, unbelievably intensive sweat, abnormally high leucocytes, etc.) with remotely narrowly targeted microwave radiation; or low-frequency modulation; or ultrasonic wave; or another harmful technological weaponry. I never told about an inevitable conclusion that someone 3 times have tested an unknown type of weapon on me. However, doctors did everything possible in their attempts to erase any objective medical data concerning those 3 incidents, to destroy all information around those 3 incidents, and to classify as secret the obvious facts - as IF THEY KNEW about the true nature of 3 mysterious attacks.


3 similar (vertigo + other symptoms) attacks in 2005, 2013 and 2016 (with the symptoms analogous to the symptoms of the injury from microwave radiation [or an action of a shock ultrasonic wave]) has been, probably, caused by an external influence. In 2015, I found information about claims that, allegedly, some kind of microwave, low-frequency, or ultrasonic weapon was tested on diplomats in London and Tel-Aviv, causing brain damage, and that the same technology was also tested on US soldiers, causing brain damage in them. When I learned about this, I composed a letter with 8 questions about the credibility of such kind of information from the scientific point of view, added the description of 2 similar attacks against me (in 2005 and 2013), and sent this letter to several famous scientists, connected to Toronto University, who were also known for their human rights' protection activism.


Now (21-6-2016), Dr. Rowen acted as if he knew about the whole content of my letter to Toronto scientists and frantically contested my theses. His actions and his fabricated lie aimed to refute - step by step, and point by point - every paragraph of the above-mentioned letter. So, not only for whitewashing Dr. Morris and other doctors, but also for destroying the credibility of my 2015 appeal to Toronto scientists (or, in other words, to destroy my claim that I was attacked by a sort of a secret weapon, in the same way as innocent diplomats and soldiers were attacked), Dr. Rowen did his mean dirty job. For this purpose, Dr. Rowen presented me as a full idiot, falsifying my words, and inventing absolutely incompatible with my personality statements, attributed to me.


This is why he fabricated the whole imaginary conversation to put a suit of an idiot on me.


I could not decipher the second page of Dr. Rowen"s official report (I received only 2 pages from the medical archive), except of 3 words "exam... ativan... cerebral...", but - according to the layout and the writing of the written characters - it is obvious that Dr. Rowen (on this page), apparently, lists the diagnostic tests, which he - actually - did not perform, and, it means that his official report is a complete forgery.


Dr. Rowen not only refused to do his doctor's duty, but used the appearance of his patient in St. Mary's Hospital as an opportunity for cover up of medical and war crimes.


(See the copy of this document below).


Dr. Rowen"s report. The 2-nd page.


The prescription of Ativan by Dr. Rowen.


He did not listen to the carotid arteries by phonendoscope; did not check pupils" reaction to light; he did not check my pulse and breath (I said that I had problems with breathing); he did not measure my temperature and blood pressure (regarding many hours of waiting after the triage room); he did not listen to my heart beat; etc.


Dr. Rowen did NOTHING. He just started to accuse me in simulation of an illness, even before he approached me; and - keeping the same accusatory tone - declared a psychiatric condition, without adducing any proof and without conducting any exams. He - definitely - lied in his report, and insulted me not only in the medical office, but also in his deceptive report.


The confirmation of my version of the events in St.-Mary"s ER (June 21, 2016) were unexpectedly found in a document - where they could be less expected: in the official report of the audiologist for August 23, 2016.


This official report and its full text are provided in this chronicle, for the corresponding book and chapter.


Let's go now to conclusions, assumptions and data that comprises the official report of the audiologist.


First, it is very important that it reflects the harmonious logicality and the internal connectivity of my reasoning (as well as - partially - the official report of Dr. Cermigni (or Cermignani) from April 24, 2015) and sharply contrasts the official reports of Madam Priestley (the nurse), or Dr. Rowen, who talked a complete nonsense in their statements, absolutely distorting and forging my words, and attributing to me completely primitive, illogical, irrational and inconsistent phrases (which reflect their aspirations to present me as a stout idiot, who "is slightly cleverer than a dog").


Secondly, it is evident that the audiologist"s conclusions are identical to my own conclusions and assumptions stated in the letter to Dr. Sejean from February 1, 2016 (sent by fax half a year before the audiologic test).


In the letter to Dr. SejeanI wrote:


"Dear Dr. Sejean! After having an acute laryngitis in January 2016, I am not sure about an ability to speak on February 5, 2016 (an appointment at 9.45, at St.-Mary's OPD Clinic). An only alternative is to describe all symptoms and suggestions in writing, in advance: before we meet".


In the official audiologist's report, we see such a phrase:


"2. Laryngitis: yes."


In my letter to Dr. Sejeanwe read:


"Problems with hearing, vocal cords, and naso-oro-and laryngo-pharynx are accumulating for years. Around 15 years ago, I used to visit an otolaryngologist at Royal Victoria Hospital. I received a water flash treatment and went through an audio-test, which produced no diagnosis. I believe that I lost an access to this specialist around 2005 or 2006.

After 2008, I often used to have my right ear blocked while cleaning the nose, or during an extensive and long physical effort.

Simultaneously, I felt like tickles in the throat, and had to clean it, which sometimes used to unblock the ear. Later (since 2012), my right ear started to be blocked for hours or even days."


In the official report of the audiologist we read:


"1. R. Ear blocked: yes."


In my same letter to Dr. Sejean from February 1, 2016, we see:


"My general hearing has also degenerated, forcing to hear only relatively loud and middle pitched sounds, merged with a problem to distinguish between particular verbal phonemes. That is causing a hardship to follow a conversation, and ruining my social life. Even in my native languages I can't catch some verbally pronounced letters, words or phrases, and the same challenge in English and French becomes a real tough task."


In the official report of the audiologist we read:


"L. Hearing is within normal limits 125-250 Hz. (...).

R. Hearing is within normal limits 125-150 Hz. (...)"


In the official report of the audiologist we also read:


"L. Hearing - in normal limits of 125-250 Hz. (...).

R. Hearing - in normal limits of 125-150 Hz. (...)"


(It means that the audibility of sounds in high and low frequency range is lost: exactly what I also wrote in the letter to Dr. Sejean).


There is no need to continue...


It - besides - confirms the connectivity of my reasoning, and proves an impossibility of such statements, which Madam Priestley's (the nurse) and Dr. Rowen have attributed to me.


I could quote hundreds of similar examples, which rebuff the deceptive statements of Dr. Rowen and Madam Pristley by definition.


As a poet and novelist, I can present innumerous enthusiastic reviews, written by famous literary critics and literary men, my biographies and articles (about me) in newspapers and magazines, and my works published in the literary magazines with highest reputation. My historical, philosophical, and scientific works rebuff any insinuations about me as, allegedly, primitive, illiterate, ignorant, and completely stupid person. It's quite another matter that my English and French are not as perfect as I wished, because I never studied English and French with a teacher, never took a course of English or French, and never attended an English or French school. However, as anyone can see, I am able to express myself coherently not only in my native languages.


In my native country, I graduated from a college and two universities, and can show my diplomas to anyone who wants to see them. No oligophrenic person (as Dr. Rowen and M-me Pristley wanted to present me) would be able to graduate from two universities.


In this regard, the audiotest (August 23, 2016) presents me rather adequately, with a thrust at the insinuations of such liars as Dr. Rowen. It is fairly amazing how much objective information can contain a strictly medical report if it was written by an honest and not morally impair medical specialist.


Not quite an ordinary corpus of information is containing in the data, which is not related directly to the audio-test:


"The family doctor argues that the patient began to hear badly since April / May (2016). In May took Septra [a mistake: in June (my own remark: L. G.)] for 3 days, and began to experience dizziness. As it seems to him, it is difficult to distinguish GDTECH. The patient had an impression that it because of the damage of the Central Nervous System".


Thus, everything, which is told here, confirms my statements concerning the dramatic side effects (complications) from Septra-antibiotic, administrating of which was difficult to understand. (It can be explained ONLY by the inhuman antibiotics policy, developed by cruel state institutions and medical bureaucrats in term to reduce the infectious microorganisms' mutations with disregard of underprivileged patients' well-being. This is why I never blamed Dr. Martin LaChance, who may be (when he assessed me) under the influence of governmental bodies, pharmaceutical companies, and other "invisible" participants in patients' drama, caused by the unfair medical system.)


This document (the audiology report) - is one of many others, which confirm that the description of what has happened in connection with Septra (including my suspicions that its side effects could cause this or that brain damage) relate to 2016, and that these statements (stated to my family doctor) have been made right after events in June 2016.


It is necessary to emphasize that - during the audio-test - I said nothing about Septra's side effects and its dreadful consequences.


There is also another aspect: the permanent changes developed right after June 21, 2016 (such as hearing and vision loss, headaches, problems with breath and the swallowing reflex, etc.) - someone (describing my assumptions and suspicions) were reduced only to the consequences of Septra's side effects (prolonged or postponed for a month), ignoring or deliberately suppressing my other statements: that a possible brain damage and all its consequences are generally connected with what happened on June 21, 2016. Thereby, the very similar cases of November 2005; January 2013; and June 2016, which coincide almost on all symptoms - are artificially divided and suppressed.


Such a thin and well thought-over misinformation, only in the minimal degree destroying the truthful reflection of my words, not exaggerating them and not distorting (in the roughest way) the logic row of my reasoning (as did Dr. Rowen), could appear only at a higher level.


A unique rough lie reflected by audiologist's official report and obviously not invented by her (but obtained from unknown medical files or from other doctors' statements): it was a claim that I, allegedly, have addressed in St.-Mary's Emergency Room concerning a panic attack (instead of well-founded suspicions on a micro-stroke or brain ischemia):


"Patient says he came to ER - told it was anxiety attack. Patient said he asked for CT-scan, carotid artery studies: "But they refused me". So .... has vertigo, but continues to have ... discrimination."


The truth is that I NEVER declared to NOBODY that 21 Jun. 2016 came to St.-Mary"s Emergency Room apropos some "panic attacks", but - instead - always claimed that came there because of the suspicions on micro-stroke or brain ischemia. It proves to be true by the recognition of that I "asked for CT-scan, carotid artery studies". Why then I asked to examine carotid artery and to do brain's tomography if "has addressed concerning panic attack"?


However, there is an additional confirmation that the statement that I, allegedly, "have addressed concerning panic attack" - is a misinformation. It is - the phrase "Patient felt CNS worked" (the patient felt that it because of the central nervous system). Though FORMALLY this phrase may be connected (in this document) to the episode with Septra, it ACTUALLY is a sheaf with the following episode in the ER, and, moreover, adjoins to the following:


"Patient felt CNS worked. - Patient says he came to ER Anamnes (...) "...


These phrases are divided only by the heading of the following section "Case History", but there was not a big sense to split them between the different sections, which is obvious.


Differently, this is a continuation of the same logic chain of events.


But this phrase - "Patient felt CNS worked" - is much more eloquent, rather than just a denial of the lie - that I, allegedly, have addressed in St.-Mary"s ER 21 Jun. 2016 apropos a "panic attack", instead of the concerning suspicion on a micro-stroke. Because this phrase was "derived" from the triage nurse"s official report from June 21, 2016, i.e. from this particular official report, which "disappeared" (was destroyed or classified (on my request, the medical archive responded that, allegedly, the triage nurse's official report "is absent in the system" (and in the archive), and I received only 2 pages of Dr. Rowen"s report - as lone remained documentation from my visit to ER).


First, it is obviously not the audiologist's style, who does not distort my words anywhere and did not compose her statement so illiterately (being, possibly, a very competent and educated - in a broad sense - person), and, it means, that this phrase is borrowed from somewhere.


Secondly, I said concerning exactly this content exactly this to the triage nurse (that the central nervous system is involved), and, in reply to my assumption, the triage nurse has blown up, having attacked me that quite reflects the style of her retelling of my words.


And, thirdly, I used the term "the central nervous system" (instead of "brain") one and only time: during the exam (June 21, 2016) by the triage nurse.


Isn't this being a key, why all dates were displaced (in audiologist's official report) for one-two months (i.e. for earlier dates, against the real events)? Isn"t someone wished to take the chronology far away from June 2016, and - especially - from June 21?


But, if I suspected (concerning Septra"s side effects from) that the central nervous system (brain) could be damaged, and if I have addressed in St.-Mary"s ER because something happened to the central nervous system (to the brain), any "panic attack" has nothing to do with it. There are no doubts that exactly for this reason they refused to give me the copy of the triage nurse's report, or (maybe) destroyed it.


It is amazing how one decent person can, without understanding the outcome, to destroy all plots and intrigues of the liars, only by her own nature.


After all, certainly, the audiologist has made a truthful (all lie came from outside, i.e. from some other sources or someone's statements) report not for my sake (as she was obviously - in advance - incited against me and brainwashed), but simply because professionally and honestly performed her work.


The practice of full irresponsibility (and non-accountability) of doctors and their protection (cover-up) by the hospitals, which also includes the withdrawals, blockage or destruction of medical documents, "classifications" of doctors' names (especially concerning the ER), etc. - is an obvious criminal practice.


In this chronicle, I have already described the discrepancy of St.-Mary's ER-ED doctors' names on their breast cards (in comparison to the names specified in the written official reports), and the substitution of names of some doctors by names of others, etc.


As a new, changed tactics of concealment and cover-ups, another method began to circulate already since 2016: the names of ER doctors began to "vanish" from the official documents in 2-3 months. But doctors" anonymity - is the same as the anonymity of bandits bossing under gangster nicknames.


However, even in this picture with Dr. Rowen - all the same - there is still something more disturbing. His motivation (the protectionism of his colleagues and the hospital) is the most probable. But, still, something reads off scale in his behavior.


Such explanations as an absolute indifference towards patients' life and health, and the aspiration to screen his colleagues (even at the price of human life), or simply laziness and unwillingness to strike a finger about a finger, or a primitive judgment about the economy of public funds at the expense of human life and patients' health (which turns out to any state much more expensive): are insufficient to make the full picture of a puzzle. Some slices, some elements all the same are missing. An assumption can fill this emptiness that, behind the motives lying on the surface, some deeper and even more ominous motives were standing up for cruel, brutal, humiliating actions of Dr. John Rowen.


Once, when I sat in an office of one doctor, and waited, while this doctor (occupied behind the computer) was busy, I have risen to lift up my cap dropped to the floor, and have automatically noted that this doctor does not write a report on a previous patient, and does not look through my medical file, but studies information on me in Google. And he did it during his working hours, in the presence of the patient in his office, into whose private life he was digging!


Another time, leaving doctor's office, I heard a name of a female patient, and have suddenly noticed that in a neighbor room a secretary or an assistant, or another doctor is searching (in the same search engine) for private data on this patient.


I also know that doctors, who have no real reason to open an electronic file of this or that patient, quite often look through it with curiosity, or on others, not connected with health-care, reasons.


One acquaintance among whose friends there are few doctors, heard from them that not only patients study the opinions on the Internet about doctors, and collect data on doctors before making a choice, but also doctors ransack in the Network (and not only in the Net) in search of especially confidential information on their actual or potential patients. And not only doctors individually, but clinics, hospitals, or radiologies: collect (through the management staff, secretaries, or assistants) confidential information about their patients.


In 1998, the central police department in Montreal has denied me a license for firearms (which was required for a potential work in a security agency (where, having despaired to find any other work, I have been forced to submit my application; there was a sharp shortage of the qualified personnel in this sphere by then). My attempts to receive an official response, on what basis it been refused to me, have not crowned by success. (However, I have received some kind of an informal answer).


Today, it is already widely known that - in the course of applications for firearms' permission evaluations, - Canadian police studies data on citizens in social networks and other doubtful sources. It is not less widely known that the Canadian gendarmerie uses military liaison methods against the activists of American Indian tribes, against their protest movements and organizations.


Such methods (data collection, analysis and a forecast of his efficiency in propaganda, organizational and media spheres; gathering personal confidential information for studying the weak, sensitive, painful places of each "unwanted" individual, and developing military and diversionary ways of their neutralization) are normally applied within the fight against an enemy, against a military adversary, not against own population.


A similar totalitarian violation of "privacy" and of the principle of the presumption of innocence, and of other fundamental principles by the medical and police communities, which rapprochement and convergation goes at full speed in all directions in all countries, subjects to corruption all main principles of democracy; freedom of speech and opinions; human and civil rights; the division of executive, legislative and judicial authority; the accountability of governmental and non-governmental services and institutions; etc.


At the beginning of 2000-s, I foretold that the totalitarian electronic tyranny, and total surveillance on citizens by means of a monstrous network of video surveillance, accumulation of huge databases and illegal collecting of confidential information: will lead to corruption of the bases of the society, and to the prompt growth of crimes. 10-15 years have passed since my predictions, and they have completely come true: the number of crimes is promptly growing not only in Toronto and in the southern provinces of Canada, but even in Vancouver, Ottawa, even in Quebec, the safest province in Canada, and in its largest city - Montreal.


The monstrous dystopian Orwellian system, which was mounted under the pretext of "safety", has rendered and renders an opposite effect, and it was explained in my forecasts.


In a broader sense, the crime corps includes also the shocking indifference of the ranking officers (doctors, engineers, financial, political and business leaders) to people's needs, to their life and health. Human life's value became so corrupted that no one cares about hundreds, thousands, or millions of unnecessary and preventable deaths. The majority of wonderful people with compassionate hearts are still working within the medical system in Canada, but they can do nothing until sadists and moral freaks, who got the control of the health care system, will be replaces by morally adequate individuals.


In all countries, which have regenerated into proto-tyrannies, trains and buses began to crash more often; bridges - to fall (burying under them hundreds of human bodies); buildings, restaurants and hotels - to burn up or to fall; and natural disasters - to bring much more destructions and troubles: due to disorder, indifference, and criminal negligence of the management; because the mouths of all critics of all dangerous projects and practices are sealed by the corrupted officials, who are signing potentially dangerous engineering and development plans, or irresponsible political decisions, which lead to catastrophic consequences.


And - without the criticism at all levels and in all social groups, not only from the height of the "permitted" broadcasts of the state radio, - the bridges and planes will fall more and more often, the innocent citizens will perish from the bullets of gangster morons, and the trains will collide and crash "out of the blue"...


And the malignant regeneration of the functions of the medical workers and the policemen, lowered from above (in which there is no fault of doctors and policemen) reflects the process of former democratic states' transformation into the repressive left or right regimes, into the proto-fascist ("red" or "gray-brown") dictatorships.


All 3 todays' main "right-wing" (or "left-wing": no difference) parties in all post-democratic countries - neoliberals, neoconservatives and neopopulists - strive to assure today"s inert (and brainwashed) general public (especially the youth) that the democracy is an existence of a ballot box and ballots with the names of 2 or several parties. It is a lie. It is not a democratic, but a majoritarian principle, comparable with a situation, in which 2 conflicting criminal gangs have decided to make peace - and have divided among themselves the control over this or that area.


The whole "democracy" is reduced to a ballot box as to a relic of the former democracy rule (which is not present any more) without the protection of personal information, free press, freedom of speech; without the liberties and human rights; without an independent court; without the division of the executive and legislative power; without the guaranteed rights of political opposition (which is not limited to one or two opposition parties of the "official opposition"); without the presumption of innocence; without the observance of the constitutional laws and rights; without the equality of citizens and rule of law; and without other main structural, systemic, legal and political principles. Besides, without all mentioned above, even the ability to vote is melting: homeless; handicap; poor; discriminated; elderly; sick (who were refused the medical care); immigrants; and other groups of people have bogus voting rights (only nominally (on paper), but not actually).


And here (when only a ballot box is left from ex-democracies), first, wins not the party, which collects more votes, but the party, which controls the votes counting (more often: which will raise more money and will gain support of the pseudo-ethnic mafia and oligarchical circles, and which is more dexterous in the roguish tricks with the votes and manipulations with the databases of personal information by means of social networks). And, secondly, this majoritarian-oligarchic pseudo-democracy very quickly and inevitably becomes a bunch of fascist regimes.


Based on reaction of some doctors to my words, and according to ombudsmen" answers to my complaints (not just those that are specified in this chronicle; including the oral responses), and on actions of the medical authorities: I made a stable impression that not only my views and my statements that are circulating in social networks and on Internet (in general) are known to them, but also the content of my personal correspondence and telephone conversations.


And, though I have not mentioned a word about the suspicions that the symptoms of an inexplicable acute indisposition, vertigo and other symptoms on November 3, 2005; a similar (more severe) attack on January 7, 2013; and a similar (more severe) attack on June 21, 2016 (after which my hearing and my vision were damaged) - were the consequences of the narrowly targeted radiation from an unknown weapon, which action was tested on me three times, doctor Rowen could still have information on my statements concerning what happened on January 7, 2013, which immediately transferred the arrows to the case of June 21, 2016, as identical, and, thus, connected with the same suspicions.


And, depending on his personal views and values, this information could embitter him against me 2 times stronger.


The same scheme was acting after the car incident on October 2, 2007, when someone could decide that this "accident" occurred, probably, not "accidently", and - for this reason - I was denied medical care; and the same pattern has played a role in the events after January 7, 2013, and June 21, 2016, and could put in action the whole brutality and cruelty of Dr. Rowen, of which he only was capable.


As well doctor LaChance (see events for June 2, 2016) could (within 40 minutes!) not only to "dig" into my medical file in Santé Québec, but also to put his nose in the search engines and social networks, getting personal and confidential information on me from there, and, consequently, had an obvious prejudice to me.


Unlike the events on January 7, 2013, when the phenomenally strong vertigo and other symptoms "have fallen down" literally from anywhere and when that attack had no explanations and roots in my previous conditions and in my medical history (in exception of a milder similar event in 2005), the events on June 21, 2016, could have (alongside with the exposure to microwave radiation) also a natural origin as well, and a lot of things that preceded these events, could lead to a stroke or a micro-stroke.


But, if those, who have tested on me their secret weapon (if the suspicions about microwave or ultrasonic radiation are not groundless), were well informed about all my medical peripetias, they could arrange a new attack during such a moment and in such a situation, when the plausibility of a heart attack or a stroke (by the natural reasons) was at the peak, and, thereby, to camouflage the invisible attack.


Another, not less ominous scenario: if Dr. John Roven has entered into the medical office of patients' examination at 23:00, and has declared at once that I should go home and not to come any more to this hospital "without a reason" did it with a rigid order "from above" to get rid of me (to kick me out; to send me home) without any medical care and without any diagnostic procedures.


JUNE 22, 2016.

On June 22, 2016, - despite my awful general health situation and with all the complications of yesterday's indisposition attack - I had to go (with my wife) to St. Mary Hospital's ER (at 9:20 a.m.), with Dr. Rowen's verbal assurance that I'll have an access to CT-scan. However, when we came there, no one was informed by Dr. Rowen about allegedly appointed CT-scan. Nor the reception nurse, neither the triage nurse: nobody was informed by Dr. Rowen about the CT-scan.


We just wasted 2 and a half hours in the waiting room, without any success. Dr. Rowen has deceived me! Having strong headache, dizziness, and the whole number of other indispositions, I had to suffer for no reason thanks to Dr. Rowen. Only a cruel sadist could do it to another person.


I also had to visit my permanent dentist, who treated me around 20 years (Dr. Jeffrey H. Tenzer). At 16:00, he has accepted me at his office - 5885 Cote-des-Neiges, Suite 509, Montreal, Quebec H3S 2T2. Tel.: (514) 737-9367. I have told to Dr. Tenzer that I suspect a cyst on the top gum, on the right side.


However, the whole dental care was put on hold, because the next day (or, probably, 2 days after Dr. Tenzer"s announcement that I have to go to a specialized clinic) my urologist has reported that the litholopaxy surgery will, probably, take place on June 30, 2016. He has not been confident yet about it, and has reported that will call me back at the beginning of the next week.


Dr. Tenzer attentively examined the area, to which I pointed, and told that probably I am right.


Answering my question how and when it is possible to remove this cyst, and - together with it - 2 molars, which treatment with my social and economic status was unpromising, Dr. Tenzer answered that he will send me to specialized clinic because to do such operation in his office is unsafe.


Here it is necessary to do a small retreat.


Thanks to sympathy towards me of Dr. Tenzer and his special arrangement, I could keep all the teeth till age of 65 definitely.


However, in Canada, the dental care is a too expensive pleasure; especially, for needy people, such as I am.


If teeth' filling without channel filling still was covered by the universal public (state) program (for people of my category), then the canal treatment has to be paid from the pocket, while the prices for this procedure have been inflated up to heaven (this procedure in Canada costs up to one thousand five hundred, or thousands of dollars).


And patients, who have no money for it - are forced to extract almost healthy teeth.


Ones, Dr. Tenzer filled up a canal, without having taken even a single cent from me. He also put filling into some teeth, bypassing the canal, though it represented for him a risk of troubles. But these 2 or 3 cases did not save other teeth, which resulted in need of their removal.


Unfortunately, I could not go to the specialized clinic - because just next day (or, perhaps, the day after tomorrow) my urologist reported that the litholopaxy operation, perhaps, will take place on June 30, 2016. He was not sure of it yet, and reported that he will call back at the beginning of the next week.


Somewhere on June 27 or 28, 2016, he has really called back, and reported that he is still kept in the dark (by hospital's administration), and does not know definitely whether he will be able to perform the planned operation on June 30, 2016; and has told that it will be cleared up till 6:30 in the morning on the same day, on June 30, 2016.


This uncertainty and lack of clarity has introduced an additional hardship and inconveniences since I could fast less time, to have a better sleep (to wake up later), to worry less, etc.


If I understood correctly, mixing up nothing: Dr. El-Hakim lost any hope that the surgery will be administrated within a reasonable time. On the opposite, he, probably, got a confirmation that I will never have an access in Montreal to any urological surgery without Dr. Morris's approval or participation. He, probably, considered obvious that the hospital's administration will sabotage the surgery forever.


Having estimated a situation of further postponement of the operation as critical, he has reached an agreement with someone from hospital's mediocre ranking medical staff and with the medics of the surgical office, and has simply appeared on June 30, 2016, when there was a gap between surgeries, without coordination with hospital's top management, and without a preliminary setting of the date - and has just performed the operation.


Thus, he did a courageous and risky act, and has literally rescued me, because - if not his brave action - the date of operation would be vaguely postponed forever - until I "play into a box"...


Such exact scenario of events could be easily predicted - if not brave, strong-willed and aggressive intervention by Dr. El-Hakim...


June 30, 2016.

The operation, which has been done on June 30, 2016, has confirmed that there were 3 uric stones, but not 4 (as Dr. Morris argued in his cystoscopy's report).


The bladder calculi consisted of 70 percent of dehydrate of calcium oxalate, and of 30 percent of calcium phosphate.


One of these stones was really slightly bigger than 2 cm, and, thus, any ultrasound scan could easy detect it by definition.


Practically everything that was stated by Dr. Morris, was disproved by surgery's report from June 30, 2016...


As for the operation, it had to be carried out under local anesthesia, but the depression, which was in full swing (by then), built a barrier of contraindications.


The general anesthesia was also contraindicated because of the remaining breathing problems (once again, my medical knowledge, perhaps, saved me from VERY serious troubles, because my reports about breathing problems were not included - for some reasons - in my file [AFTER the preoperative exams and interviews], and I warned about these problems already laying on the operating table).


I was put into sleep in a different way, receiving - at the same time - an injection into the spinal cord for local anesthesia.


The treatment of all personnel, surgeon's assistants, and, in general, of everyone, who worked in the surgical department and in the operating theatre - was exclusively benevolent and human so that I simply did not expect it. (Especially: having behind my shoulders all the negative experiences of my former ordeals).


But already by the time of operation I was (to the limit) exhausted and weakened by the whole avalanche of the passed cruel events.


Since March 3, 2016, before the operation (on June 30, 2016): 7 outbreaks of urological infection of Enterococci; 7 or 8 courses of Cipro (antibiotic), and other antibiotics; more than 20 tormenting visits to medical institutions - from emergency rooms to laboratories, policlinics, etc. 3 times of such serious tract failures as ischuria.


The medications prescribed on June 30, 2016, after the operation.


Right after the operation, I did not feel the lower half of a body too long, and then - did not feel my legs. Local anesthesia departed very long.


Then I was brought to a room, where, separated from each other by curtains, there were stretcher-beds with patients brought from different surgeries (some of them, on the contrary, waited for their operation).


After near 10 minutes (I still had a "fog" before my eyes and in my head; the legs did not obey my mental order; I could not move independently; I was still half unconsciousness) a black nurse approached, and - literally - ordered to make haste and be swept out from here, because "the place is necessary for other patients".


I never met such cruelty and ill-treatment in this hospital, nor before, neither later. All medics of all skin colors, whom I faced here, were very lovely people, or, at least, tried to keep within the polite address. I have no complaints or claims to any medic of this hospital (from May, 2016 - to January, 2017), and only this fury (this 45-47-year-old woman, slightly lower than the average growth) was puffed up by evil and rage. And, by the way, I never saw again this plump nurse.


Her rage and hostility was visible even before she began to speak me, already when she was just approaching. It means that she was enraged against me even before she met and saw me for the first time. This absolutely inexplicable hostility is confirming, in my opinion, that the surgery was partially unauthorized, and any place for me in this pre- and post-surgery unit was not provided. Such an explanation interprets - why she treated me as an "illegal" patient, and why she rushed to expel me from this place so aggressively and cruelly. I could also read in her aura something like a jealousy (she could be enraged by a "privilege" or "favor", rendered to me by an entire team of medics, who, collectively, arranged an "illegal" - from her point of view - operation).


I told the nurse that I still practically cannot move, and that I cannot "leave" - because I feel incapable to go.


She answered it that she gives me no more than 10 extra minutes, and attacked me verbally with charges that, allegedly, because of me, she cannot bring one more patient to the same bed.


Even considering an unusual situation, such brutality could not be excused by the circumstances, and could be imagined exclusively in dark savage societies, or in war zones in war time. So, her vicious behavior and something else in her intonations and gestures assumed that she used the roughness and callousness to hide something secret: perhaps, a preparation of some inhuman act. As it cleared up later - the "device" was inserted too roughly, and caused an injury, having left a serious stricture, and, perhaps, other significant problems. When, later, I asked Dr. El-Hakim - who did it, he said that he left before this procedure. Few weeks later, after questioning two men-paramedics, and one female nurse, whom I remembered as helping around the surgery, I learned that no one knows who did it, and this, in turn, hints a suggestion that someone completely unknown to the entire staff came in - and, probably, deliberately inflicting the injuries.


However, the damage caused something much more serious than just the structure.


When the black nurse returned, I noticed that the underwear, which was put on over catheter, became wet, and the moisture arrives massively, wetting everything. I told her about it, and asked to call the doctor. She declared that she will not call the doctor, and that - if I want, - I can go down, in the emergency department, and sit there not less than 12 hours, because, she stressed, today the emergency room is especially overcrowded, and there are a lot of serious case patients.


Now, it became absolutely clear that this nurse is not just a cruel sadist, but an executioner-killer, engaged in a carnage.


I answered that I can hardly move around, and can only lie, so, it is just impossible to sit with the catheter (moreover - on firm chairs) in the ER waiting room merely physically, and she perfectly knows it. I also added that there is, perhaps, the beginning of bladder's perforation, because the liquids must depart ONLY through the "device" strictly into the collector, but not to pour out outside, having wetted even the stretcher-bed's linen.


Then it seemed that her attitude, it appears, has softened, and she ordered me to go off from the wheel stretcher, allegedly, to look - what occurs when I stand, especially, as, she added, it is necessary to check whether I am able to stand.


But, after I - supported by my wife - got down from the stretcher-bed to the floor, it turned out that the nurse only used this dirty trick to deceive us, having immediately rolled up the bed - so that I had no place to lay down.


Neither in me, nor in my spouse, there were no more forces, nor will to fight, and I, having somehow limped to the car, where we were awaited by one of our daughters, went home.


On the road, on the jolty and hilly route 20 or 30 km from home, the liquids began to be splashed out literally outside, having wetted all my clothes that was followed by terrible, incomparable, intolerable pain. It is hardly worth doubting that, because of the nurse, there was the perforation of the bladder.


I was just lucky that it ended miraculously without catastrophic consequences.


This case - one of uncountable cases showing how all efforts of even best doctors, especially such humanitarian doctors as Dr. El-Hakim, who did everything possible and impossible to save me from conceivable irreversible damage and death (deliberately prepared by the government): were torpedoed at different levels and by other medics - and almost nullified.


Who knows what consequences were caused by that deliberate provocation of bladder perforation by a stranger, who performed the final procedure after the surgery, and by that vicious nurse, who archly expelled me from the hospital, despite my pitiful (almost critical) state, nearly complete incapability to move, my demands to call a doctor, and already started bladder perforation...


CHAPTER 9. July 2016.


JULY, 2016.


July 1, 2016.

I spent one day with catheter, and then there was a threat of re-inserting anew, because the outflow function was not started in any way.


The trauma from the incorrectly inserted "device" was serious, but it had to be just ignored, because of even more serious problems...


After my call, 2 medics immediately came to my home from the local CLSC, restated the catheter, and told that someone, who did this procedure at the hospital, did "a very bad job" ("fait un très mauvais travail").


Wonderful people work in the local policlinic (into whose hands I was sent by doctors and by the hospital) ...


In most cases, the catheter is removed in 24, maximum 48 hours after a cysto-litholopaxy operation, but, in my case, it was removed after 3 days. This is another evidence of the damage, caused by one or two medics, who committed 2 medical terrorism acts.


July 4-8, 2016.

Without catheter I was only 1 day (or near 2 days), because the next accident burst on July 4, 2016.


At night, July 5, 2016, bladder pains began, and other symptoms followed, and - by the morning - the temperature jumped up to 39C, and ischuria (almost complete retention) followed.


At night, I called the Ambulance service.


Despite the urgency, intolerable pain, and my terrible health situation, I was carried not to the nearest hospital, and not even to one of Montreal hospitals, but to the same suburban town, where I had the operation. It was especially weird as paramedics took me there despite my wife's protest and despite my own disagreement.


I told them that my doctor (I meant Dr. El-Hakim) does not work in that hospital, and I will be - all the same - redirected to him. Why, in that case, to go to the "other end of the world", if I will not be able to get to the doctor (who did the operation) through this emergency department? What, then, the sense to go such a distance?


Besides, both the paramedics, and I - we all knew that there is a disastrous situation in the Lakeshore Hospital, which is catastrophically overcrowded, and in the emergency department - there is just all hands on deck, because - for the local community - this hospital is too small, and its emergency department is especially tiny.


On any logic, I should be carried to one of 4-5 nearest hospitals in Montreal, at distance of only 2-3 km from my home: MG Hospital, Verdun Hospital, Royal Victoria Hospital, etc.


But the ambulance team - good, lovely people - had no choice; they were instructed - still before their arrival (to my home) on call - not to carry me in any other hospital, except the Lakeshore Hospital. Such cruelty, hostility, and discrimination by their bosses generated paramedics' sympathy towards me, because they never met anything alike.


Such mockeries, were, undoubtedly, linked with my conflict with Dr. Morris, and with cancellation of operation at St.-Mary's Hospital, and had nothing to do neither with the medical domain, nor with the specifics of the Ambulance service. It was just a part of politically-motivated medical repressions. No doubt that the order to bring me strictly to Lakeshore hospital, which the Ambulance's team received from their bosses, also represented a kind of a reprisal and an insult directed against Dr. El-Hakim, as a punishment for performing partially non-authorized (not "completely approved") operation, i.e. for saving life of an ideological opponent of the most savage Canadian and foreign political monsters.


For inexplicable reasons, the most part of the way the Ambulance car was moving not on the highway, or, in other words, not directly from my home to the hospital along the shortest route, but on the bypassing, small, broken roads, and very strong jolting accompanied 90 percent of the way. These car's bunny-hopping and wheel bouncing on full of potholes, bumpy, and jolty roads, and strong jerks and pushes - caused in me severe pain, and provoked spontaneous bladder emptying, so, that the trousers (from top to the bottom) became literary soaked - wet through - on me - though wring out. Even the jacket was a little bit wetted.


Taking into consideration all background circumstances, it is also possible that the Ambulance's team was given not just an order to bring me strictly and exclusively to Lakeshore hospital, but also to drive me on detour bumpiest roads, for provoking uncontrolled out-splash of the bladder content and humiliating me.


And - in such humiliating and pathetic look - I was brought to the emergency department.


I had neither a spare linen, nor trousers, and, on my requests to give me some hospital clothes, the personnel answered that they have so much work that just have no time to be engaged in it - and I quite believed them. And, still, they could just send my wife to a closet room, where they keep the hospital clothes and linen, without even accompanying her, so, the whole situation prompted that the ER staff received an order from their superiors not to provide me with dry closing, and that the whole sequence of mockery, torture, and humiliation (from the order to bring me to the most distant hospital against my will; to the order to drive me via longest detour and bumpy way, and to deny me dry clothes at the hospital) - was part of someone's plan.


I had to continue "to sport" in all wet clothes, in front of all public, which was there, enduring all depth of humiliation and mockery.


But the malicious insults in the ER were not restricted by just the denial of dry clothes, and, thus, by the moral torture: it was too cool in the whole emergency department; in some places - only 14-17 degrees Celsius, and the coldest place was in the waiting room. And, in the situation of Harper-Trudeau regime's drastic shift towards the policy of totalitarian reprisals against any dissentient (disagreeing) person, nobody (in the waiting room) had a courage to ask: why driving air conditioners when outside is a very cold (for this season) July night?


Thus, the refusal to provide me with the dry hospital's clothes was not just morally insulting, but also represented a source of a potential infection and a part of insanitary conditions, because sitting in the ER waiting room in soaked (wet through) clothes under air conditioners, which brought down the temperature to 14 degrees Celsius, was (especially in my state) equal to deliberate provocation of serious complications.


And, because the medical personnel were, despite their denial of the dry clothes, very friendly and compassionate, it assumed another suggestion: that they indeed received an order not to provide me with dry clothes from their superiors.


As if echoing to my thoughts, an elderly gentleman said to his neighbor that, in his opinion, it is so cold in the waiting room (and the running air conditioners made the air colder and colder) not because the ER personnel is indifferent (not compassionate), but because of the government's desire to create conditions in ER-s so uncomfortably substandard that they will drive sick people away from the hospitals. His words received an indirect prove very soon. When this same gentleman (and, a bit later, someone else) approached the wall, and changed the digits at the wall temperature controlling display, a strange man, who was looking like a member of the technical personnel, but was wearing the white gown, came - and changed the temperature back to 15 degrees Celsius.


As I already mentioned, in the refusal to provide me with the dry dress there was nothing personal, just a presumable order from their bosses, because the ER personal was behaved very amicably, even sympathetically. Despite the work involving all hands and chock-full waiting room packed with unfortunate people, who were sitting there already for 10-15 hours, the ER staff quickly arranged for me an ultrasound scan (pre- and post-void) and other tests, which showed that the bladder is full, and that the situation is already on the verge of very serious consequences.


They suggested to put me urgently on catheter again.


When I heard it, everything grew cold inside.


Even 64 hours with the catheter - after the operation on June 30, 2016 - seemed for me the end of the world, or the most terrible torture, worse than any pain.


The depression was in full swing; I could not read in such situation; could not go, could not walk up and down; and all other delights...


The very procedure of catheterizing - again - after the traumas of the operation and the traumas, which someone (probably, deliberately) inflicted while placing the catheter previously, right after the surgery, - when nothing even began to heal: it promised a terrible experience.


Now - it was clear to anyone - if to resort to catheter: it will not be limited by 2-3 days; now it will be a question of weeks, if not months; and it sent such a horror, which, I was afraid, will kill me.


Therefore, I clung to any saving straw, trying to find other way out.


I knew about strong diuretics, which are given in similar cases, and asked about it the junior medical personnel, but I was answered that - without a doctor - nobody will prescribe it for me.


Then I said that I do not give my consent to catheter and that I will not give it until I see a doctor. They answered - already with irritation - that then it is necessary to wait for a doctor not less than 12-16 hours, and, during this time, I'll, certainly, have a renal failure...


However, I noticed that to see a doctor: it is my constitutional, legitimate right, and that - if they have such a catastrophic situation in this hospital, - let's call the ambulance, and to bring me at least to Lasalle hospital, where the situation is ten times less intense, and where there are ten times more chances to be assessed by a doctor in time.


But it was clear in advance that they already received an "iron" order to keep me in this hospital for any cost from the officials of such a high rank that - in comparison with it - the chief physician of this hospital is no more important than some small insect.


I was told to go to the waiting room - and to wait there in the general queue!


But there was more to come!


In spite of the fact that I was brought here by the ambulance hours earlier, and, according to any logic, my turn had to be counted from the moment of my arrival to hospital, I was told (hours later) - to take a "number" (coupon) and to wait in the general line.


I never demanded the archival documents, and did not check the chronology on hours in the documentation (which, anyway, can be easily falsified by any hospital, as the readers could see from the previous cases), but, say, if I arrived to this hospital at 3 or 4:30 in the morning, then I took the "number" (the coupon) not earlier than 6:30 in the morning, i.e. 2 and a half - 3 hours later.


Even more astonishing that nobody told me about it at once.


They not only violated the fairness of my waiting time priority according to the time of my arrival to the hospital; not only violated my queue status; not only (which is obvious) sabotaged the registration procedure and did not fill any official formulary on my arrival; not only destroyed the fact that I was taken to this hospital by the Ambulance; but also deliberately concealed from me that I was not registered (by them) upon my arrival, and will be forced to take the general line 3 hours after coming to the ER. Moreover, when I spoke to the nurses about my disagreement to be put again on the catheter, and demanded to see a doctor, they did not tell anything about the requirement for me for the new registration for the common queue. I learned about it absolutely accidentally, when addressed in one of the administration-registration windows (I do not remember now - in what occasion).


If not this accidental discovery, I would be doomed to wait 12 or more hours - IN VAIN!


By that moment, it already "punched" 9 in the mornings, and my wife, who stayed all this time with me, ran to the clinic of Dr. El-Hakim, who agreed to see me urgently though his clinic's waiting room was densely packed with other patients.


He carried out all necessary tests, palpated my abdomen, pressing on the bladder, and showed me the level of non-voiding area, which was already critical. I drank (in Lakeshore Hospital ER-s waiting room) about a half-liter of water. I managed to void the bladder once again just slightly, but - when I returned to doctor's office - it was almost as full as before.


The doctor told that, first of all, one or two additional operations are needed now anyway, because - as it appeared - calcification got even into the uterus (that was already known even in March), and the outlet pass is narrowed and obstruct. This is the cause of the retention and the obstruction. He reminded that told me about the need of such a surgery (which would prevent the uro-lithiasis development and the need of the cysto-litholopaxy surgery) years ago (since 2010 or 2011), but, unfortunately, by then, the Lakeshore Hospital denied him the access to the operational theatre for operating me, and none of his fellows-surgeons agreed to operate me, either.


Dr. El-Hakim's revelations left no doubts that my treatment was sabotaged during 15 years, and that my health drama is a punishment for my non-conformism and for my independent opinions.


And my present pitiful situation was fully provoked by the sadistic nurse's actions in the post-operational unit (see above). This is her direct guilt that such a deadly turn happened 5 days after the operation. If she called the doctor, and the bladder perforation would be assessed, then nothing similar would not occurred.


Despite my own tragedy, I noticed that Dr. El-Hakim is, probably, very sick himself, and a wave of sadness and sorrow has overwhelmed me. I believe that (in some situations) I can read people's emotional state and their mental impulses, and I deciphered (in Dr. El-Hakim's aura) that he, probably, received a terrible blow from bad guys to his own health (which has nothing to do with me, but connected to his aid to some very important public figures). I recalled in my memory that I saw famous statesmen, cultural workers, and other VIP persons, who used to come with their bodyguards or associates, and were seen by Dr. El-Hakim without waiting in line. I also noticed (in his office's waiting room) a number of super-rich people, who, probably, visited Dr. El-Hakim not only because he is one the best diagnostician in Quebec, but also because he helps patients, who live under a threat of assassination, fearing that the health care can be used against them as a bullet.


This fully explains why Dr. El-Hakim appeared to be AN ONLY urologist in Montreal, who had enough courage to help me.


Concerning the present situation, he told the following.


Quite considerable hyperplasia and uterus outlet calcification demand another surgery, which cannot be performed right now. Since I am already on Flomax, there is not a lot of hope on additional diuretics, though he assumes that, in my case, it would work. However, he said, we have 2 considerable obstacles. One of them is the need of hospitalization, or CSLC's daily follow ups (if we want to avoid the catheter), because medics "must watch me", but no hospital's doctor will hospitalize me, and no hospital's doctor would refer me for daily CLSC's assessments. I did not ask - why, - because the very fact of systematic mistreatment and persecution in the hospitals was obvious. And here, he said, another obstacle: the need of the momentary voiding of the bladder, and restoration of all functions. If, he said, very strong diuretics were already appointed for me during my today's stay in the ER's waiting room, I would have "good chances" to recover from this unfortunate situation. Regrettably, the ER staff was inclined in advance to leave me only one-single solution: the catheter, and now, 7 hours later - it is too late.


So, he stressed again, strong diuretics are prescribed to a patient during his stay in the hospital under observation of doctors, and he does not work in the hospital.


Therefore, an only option that they left for me (before he had an opportunity to see me): is catheter.


Now, he said, we must discuss the last issue. Not only the operation, but also someone's "bad work" (who placed the catheter after the surgery not properly), and then (because of this) the reinstallation of catheter by CLSC's worker: terribly traumatized "everything". So, now, the 3-rd catheter's replacement after the surgery is threatening not only by real physical torture, but also by possible complications.


But he promised to arrange the most qualified catheter's placement, considering all above mentioned, and promised to do later everything possible that the catheter should stay for the most minimal time for my case.


And he kept his word! (This will be retelling later).


When I complained about the deepening of already deep depression after the events of June 21, 2016, he prescribed some medication and also wrote a note to a famous psychologist (to the same, to whom he gave me a referral earlier, on June 6, 2016), who, he promised, guarantees the confidentiality. He stressed that it is very difficult to get to this psychologist; people wait for years; but he will arrange for me a visit within one or two weeks.


(And, yet, I did not go to the psychologist).


He also wrote a note to a famous virtuoso catheter placer, not only the best in this hospital, but, probably, in whole Montreal, and made a call by phone to arrange an urgent appointment for this procedure.


As we can see, all his actions radically differed from the actions of Dr. Morris, indifferent to human sufferings, and disregarding the culture of the attitude towards patients, whose whole sympathy came down to a medical and diagnostic part.


Besides (again - unlike Dr. Morris), this doctor blamed himself (not his patient) for all medical failures and mistakes, having said that "we entered and we left, and, it seems, left a stricture and other complications", because this man merely did not want to point to other people, and I don't trust his self-reproach, because I am sure: this was, on one hand, a pure nobility and solidarity with his colleagues, and, on the other hand, fear and unwillingness to lay blame on those, who can "smear anybody on a wall".


I assume that the additional stricture (one was left by very 1-st cystoscopy performed by Dr. Daniel Pharand) and other complications could be connected with the unnecessary cystoscopy, which Dr. Morris forced me to accept, and with the fault of someone from the junior medical personnel (in charge of the postoperative catheter) - as was already explained above.


Concerning the indispensable additional operation, the doctor told that it can be done - when I will be "morally, physically, and psychologically ready", because "there is no haste" yet, and, besides, it will be necessary to discuss its details and options.


Then, he - once again - explained where to go in the Lakeshore Hospital and how to find an office where "the best expert" will meet me.


The catheter was really placed with the minimum traumatic effect, and - arriving to this procedure - I literally felt (all the time) as if by skin an emanation of sympathy and compassion.


So, since July 5, 2016 - again - I was put on catheter for 6 days because of new outbreak of infection and ischuria! It was a real hell. (At the same time, the infection, pain, indisposition, etc. - continued).


One of Dr. El-Hakim's secretaries told me that, if I would agree to give my consent for catheter in Lakeshore Hospital's ER, it would be not removed for weeks, not days, and, still, though it did not lengthen out for weeks, there could not be a greater physical, psychological and moral torture.


As I stayed at home, I had to learn how to change the sacks myself, and to do all the rest that - moreover in my state and in deep depression - appeared awfully difficult.


The doctor agreed with the local district French clinic, and a nurse and paramedic came few times from there, checking my state and helping with everything. I never expected such humanity, such fine treatment. They were wonderful people, who had not just the human attitude, but people thinly feeling and guessing the nerve of the problems (and sufferings), which is a very delicate and smart thing while offering the most necessary help.


They convinced me (during these 6 days of torture) to take (at least every other day) Ativan, the antidepressant prescribed by Dr. El-Hakim. Otherwise, they claimed, the crushing blow will be struck my health. And they were - probably - right. While this medication did not help at all, but - partially - eased the sufferings caused by depression.


It is clear, that - in my situation - I could not come to gastroenterologist's office in Royal Victoria Hospital, for the appointment planned for July 5, 2016 (9:15).


However, later, absolutely other doctors in other hospitals (not in RVH) - having seen that I did not attend this appointment, accused me of "sabotaging the appointment", and, under this pretext, refused the medical treatment...


July 8, 2016.

On one of my record - the catheter was removed on July 8, 2016, but, according to another record - on July 10. What of these records is correct? There is neither time, nor forces to check it...


July 9, 2016.

On July 9, 2016 - I finished the next course of Cipro (antibiotic).


July 12, 2016.

The next chapter of my health's ruining: was an infection in the mouth (which could develop after 7 courses of ciprofloxacin and 2 other antibiotics suppressing the normal flora, which opens the door to other (aggressive, malicious microorganisms).


This infection, as I believe, provoked an abscess, and, concerning the abscess (July 12, 2016, at 9:00) I addressed to the dentist, Dr. Tenzer.


On the same day - on July 12, 2016 - he prescribed Clindamycin: to treat the abscess on the upper right gum and to prepare the removal of 2 teeth.


After 4 tablets of Clindamycin I had a very serious diarrhea with terrible gripes in the intestines, colorectal inflammation - very serious, with ulcerations and threat of sepsis, and with terrible gripes and colic in the intestines.


I endured nearly fatal colitis.


It is unknown for what reason (this time) Dr. Tenzer, who was usually prescribing Erythromycin (which always worked for me effectively and never caused any side effects, such as, in particular, diarrhea), appointed Clindamycin.


Diarrhea lasted 2 weeks (and acute diarrhea - 8 days), against the background of an absolute indifference of doctors (for such an advert reaction to antibiotics I had to be - at least - hospitalized).


During all these terrible events, my weight so sharply and rapidly minimized that I was on the verge of dystrophy.


Diarrhea kept 8 days, and it is told in the instruction to Clindamycin - that, in case of diarrhea, it is advised to address urgently to an Emergency Room.


It was a new disaster, because I could not sit, and was not able to sit out many hours in an emergency department.


Dr. Tenzer appointed the removal of 2 teeth (at my request) to Tuesday, July 19, 2016.


Meanwhile, on the same day, July 12, 2016, I addressed to the walk-in clinic La Cite (not in the most visited by me Metro-clinic, where it is necessary to hatch out for 4-6 hours), but my request for medical help concerning acute diarrhea was ignored.


Nearly the most terrible occurrence: it is that all these dramatic events and related to them sufferings followed one another, without any break, and that, in turn, deepened the depression.


Diarrhea on the verge of catastrophic outcome lasted 8 days, and only somewhere on July 20, 2016 - declined.


July 13, 2016, Wednesday.

On July 13, 2016, I met with my family doctor (9:30).


I asked to him to prescribe something concerning diarrhea, and also to replace Clindamycin by another antibiotic, but achieved nothing.


July 14, 2016, Thursday.

On July 14, 2016, I addressed again to Dr. Tenzer, because the extensive abscess on the right upper gum did not respond to treatment yet, but I also suspected that the chronic infection provoked the formation of a cyst in the same place, which - already as a secondary complication - was infected, having formed a bigger abscess.


Considering the complexity of a clinical picture, Dr. Tenzer decided not to remove an estimated cyst and 2 teeth at his office, but sent me to a specialized tooth surgical clinic of Dr. Solomon (Benjamin) Saleh, where I went for the 1-st time on the same day, on July 14, 2016.


In the referral, it was specified that Dr. Tenzer directs me to Dr. Solomon Saleh, who is the chief doctor of this clinic (and, perhaps, the owner), and the most experienced doctor among all other dentists, who worked there.


Running forward: I somehow got out of diarrhea caused by Clindamycin (with a complication in the form of the external inflammation, etc.). But - on July 14 and 19 - it was not still clear whether I could ease this serious gastroenterological problem.


The clinic of Dr. Saleh was situated on Jean Talon St., near the end of Cote des Neige St., at the border of the rich and very special municipality.


Until - having appeared in clinic - I showed the verso of the social benefit check-stub, everything went normally: they were going to register me for an urgent appointment with Dr. Saleh. But - as soon as they learned that I have no private insurance, and that, besides, I am on social benefit for 1 year, they bounced me to Dr. Dao, who was probably a young beginning specialist though my case was complicated and required special attention and approach, and, besides, they perfectly knew that, as Dr. Tenzer sent me to Dr. Saleh - it means that it was necessary.


My next "purgatories" began exactly with it.


It is difficult to determine with confidence the age of Dr. Dao, because Asians often look much younger than Europeans of their age, but it was possible to conclude (considering by his behavior, by his shape, taking in consideration how Dr. Dao spoke, etc.) - that he was 20+ years old, or around 30. And my case demanded a very experienced surgeon...


I told this doctor-dentist that I suspect the infected cyst complicated by an infection, and I believe that it is necessary to extract 2 teeth, which are not subject to treatment (if I have no money for dental treatment). I also asked to take a sample (of the cyst) for a biopsy.


Dr. Dao decided to pull out 2 teeth without having appointed any antibiotic in general - instead of Clindamycin, in a situation of an infection and huge infected abscess on the gum, having refused a swab test (concerning the infection), and not having performed additional examinations concerning the cyst (in particular, the CAD scan, which I requested and which could be done inside this clinic). Clearly, the risk of excessive suffering and medical security of a welfare recipient is not considered worth a pig heir.


While Dr. Dao refused the essential preoperative therapy and crucial tests, he appointed the X-ray of ALL TEETH despite my disagreement (that, however, could be not a personal initiative of Dr. Dao, but, anyway, represents the deeply immoral, unethical and harmful policy of many dental clinics in Canada). The reasons for imposing an X-ray of ALL teeth are multiple and various, from simple money extortion and coercion to do not just a single procedure in the clinic, to spying activity and commercialization of medically extorted information. Thus, doctors like Dr. Dao, who agreed to work in such clinics as the clinic of Dr. Solomon Saleh, wittingly agreeing to do unethical acts.


One can be told for certain: that concerning refusal in the CAD scan, in the analysis on a biopsy and a smear and also in carrying out about what is slightly lower.


I repeatedly asked Dr. Dao to replace Clindamycin with another antibiotic, underlining that I do not want to pull out 2 teeth until the healing of the abscess and cyst's removal, because, maybe, Dr. Tenzer is going to repair the teeth without filling the canal, or, maybe, my friends will collect money for canal treatment. But he insisted on simultaneous cyst's excision and both teeth extraction, having told that it is better to remove them as soon as possible - despite inflammation and abscess, - because, otherwise, the situation may become even more dangerous. In the societies like Canada and other English-speaking countries, where it is permitted to kill and mutilate-disable people for profit, or because they don't have money, it is impossible to know if Dr. Dao said the truth, or he was just imposing a standard plan for poor underprivileged patients.


When I was brought on X-ray, and learned that they going to scan ALL TEETH, I was indignant, and said in French that the dental X-ray - is one of the most harmful and dangerous radiation procedures, that I already did recently several X-rays at Dr. Tenzer's clinic, that I had the vitreous body detachment in both eyes, and that, therefore, a dental X-ray constitutes for me a special danger in provoking cataract.


Then the female assistant, who was carrying out the X-ray exam, became angry and hostile, and said that, in that case, I have to look for other clinic, because the rules in THIS clinic are that and that, and "nobody will do an exception" for me.


Still suffering from a deep depression, which only periodically began to retreat after the litholopaxy surgery, I powerlessly conceded - though thoughts about a request to talk to Dr. Dao or Dr. Solomon Saleh rushed in my head.


After first exams and the X-ray of all teeth (July 14, 2016), Dr. Dao, having learned that Clindamycin provoked serious side-effects, did not dare to prescribe antibiotics at all, and ordered to come on July 22, 2016: for the procedure of 2 teeth extraction.


Now he told that there is no cyst. And, if there is no cyst, then the biopsy is not needed. Such a "logic" explains why Dr. Dao began to negate the cyst: because such a negation could save additional time for additional procedures and bring other benefits to the clinic and to Dr. Dao himself. It is also possible that Dr. Dao simply had no license for such procedures as cysts' incision, or had no confidence in his knowledge and skills for this. Anyway, I might be wrong in my speculations about his motives, but Dr. Tenzer, an excellent, knowledgeable, and very experienced dentist, had no doubts about the diagnosis, being sure that there is a cyst. He even mentioned the diagnosis "cyst" in his note to Dr. Saleh. I - as well - had no doubts that the cyst is there.


When I asked - what about the infection, the doctor answered that, as a rule, after exodontia (with which it is connected) it passes by itself.


On my question - why, then, it is necessary to wait till July 22, but not to extract these teeth now, he did not answer.


Despite all his decisions, which puzzled me, he succeed in extorting my consent for the extraction under these dubious circumstances.


The operation (as it was already told above), was appointed to July 22, 2016.


July 19, 2016, Tuesday.

On July 19, 2016, at 10:00, I came to Dr. Tenzer's office again.


The abscess on the gum still did not give in to antibiotics and did not decrease, though did not increase any more.


I suspected that the chronic infection provoked the formation of the cyst in the same area, which - already as a secondary complication - was infected, having formed the bigger abscess, which did not shrink during last course of antibiotics.


All this occurred while I developed the next urological drama, and could not just visit regularly Dr. Tenzer, but could not even come to him even randomly at all.


I almost do not doubt that - if I had a regular treatment at Dr. Tenzer, then it would not happen, and, thus, this next drama was a consequence - again - of everything that happened because of the bias to my complaints and obstinacies of Dr. Morris, and also because of the brutal and cruel treatment of other doctors and hospitals.


When I repeated to Dr. Tenzer the assumption that I have probably an infected cyst on the upper gum, he made one more picture, and told that, perhaps, after all there is no cyst. But added that - for full confidence - it is possible to show me to one more expert, who specializes in cases of new growths in a mouth: if I insist.


But I did not begin to abuse the good attitude of Dr. Tenzer, who - during all these years - already did for me so many favors.


In 5 minutes, I realized that Dr. Tenzer began to refute his own diagnosis "cyst" right after Dr. Dao at Solomon Saleh clinic began to rule it out, and, thus, he ruled it out just because it was dangerous for him to contest the conclusion of such a rich and influential clinic. I immediately started to regret my decision not to use an opportunity to visit a specialist, who specialize in this medical area. However, it was too late.


The doctor left this room, and then his assistant was engaged with me.


When I could already go home, Dr. Tenzer was busy with other patients, and I did not want to distract him or wait, and left home.


July 20, 2016, Wednesday.

On July 20, 2016 I visited my family doctor (8:15), to whom I came concerning chronic diarrhea.


He wrote out the requisition for the laboratory analysis concerning diarrhea, but - as I was convinced later, - this kind of analyses was doomed to the same as all other analyses. No bacterium could be identified by definition, because the system did not want and was not going to identify it.


It is not just my conviction based on SYSTEMATIC manipulations with my analyses, losses and falsification of the laboratory reports, and other numerous manipulations, but (besides the whole corpus of evidence presented in this chronicle) - more concrete conclusions based on more concrete facts. Avoiding to be unfounded, I provide the following document (see below):


The printout of the laboratory report from September 14, 2016, on the requisition of Dr. Szego, gastroenterologist. (See above)


If this is a "result" of a laboratory analysis, then, what can be called "no result"?! In this document, it is claimed that the analysis... does not exist... because, allegedly, "there is no sample"! But, if to argue logically, that - if I came to the laboratory and provided the sample, then where the sample got to?! Where is the sense?


It is not a single "result" of this kind during the same period of time.


Exactly in a month, November 17, 2016, St. Mary's Hospital's laboratory has delivered another "result" of the same kind (an evident sabotage (see below).


In the printout of its result (microbiological culture), it is said that, allegedly, "there is no sample" i.e. that the test tube was actually empty - as it is possible to decipher the note "decomte bas, ID non fait". (See below)


The microbiology culture, from 16 Nov. 2016.


It is impossible to know (because it is not specified) the reason of the "low count": low microorganism's concentration, low volume of sample, or laboratory's error. However, because such kind of reports are exceptionally rare, and, judging by the systematic sabotage of my laboratory tests, this report is nothing else but another act of sabotage. Taking into consideration the fact that near half of my laboratory tests' reports are marked by such messages as "low count", "confused with other patient's sample", vitamin C incompatibility (while I don't take vitamin C or other products with vitamin C!), "no sample", "patient refused to provide a sample", "this part of test is missing", and so on: it excludes any accidental "errors", but points to a deliberate sabotage on the level of laboratories, computer networks and digital databases, or manual diversions by some "technical workers".


Concerning the sample volume, I, anxious with obtaining the right result on bacterial infection detection (microbiology culture), always strictly follow all instructions.


[Added in the end of 2017: In December, 2017, the number of lab tests, done outside of Montreal, has increased till 20, and none of them disappeared, or was incomplete, or had any remark like "no sample", or "low counts". Moreover, all 20 tests identified the infection (while NONE of dozens of Montreal tests identified the infection). The conclusion is inevitable: my laboratory tests are sabotaged only in the city of my residence: in Montreal. However, if I would pass the lab tests ONLY outside of Montreal, the authorities would, probably, expand the territorial range of their "anti-medical" operations.]


Secondly, a month ago, almost the same pretext was used for sabotaging another analysis (see the previous photocopy); so, two such "coincidences" in a row are not realistic.


Thirdly, for many years (since 2001), the same procedure was exposed to sabotage all the time: the test for microbiology (bacteriological culture) that originates from the conflict with the department of immigration and consulate of one foreign state, and goes back to my immigration saga, and to threats of immigration officials - in case of my refusal "to be treated" for (alleged (the diagnosis was falsified: see previous books) "tuberculosis" - "to award" me with a urological infection.


Fourthly, the laboratories of the public hospitals used ALL methods for sabotaging my laboratory analyses, EVERYTHING, except ONE, and, therefore, the next logical step inevitably had to include "low count" "excuse", which was still not employed until now.


It is necessary to add that I have no reasons not to trust three St. Mary Hospital's laboratory's doctors-chiefs, and their professionalism, which makes this laboratory one of the best in Canada.


Also, it is quite illogical and improbable that someone of them is involved in criminal manipulations with patients' analyses.


On the contrary, the most logical and probable version is that all tricks with the analyses (as a part of repressions against objectionable persons) are carried out by means of junior medical personnel and not medical staff (including cleaners and technical workers, security services staff, system analysts, network managers, etc.), and also by means of electronic computer technologies, including the replacement of authentic data in the electronic database by false data, destruction of data, or substitution of the output data. Heads and technicians of medical electronic systems; chiefs of the offices of access to information, and other workers of this sphere: here through whom, logically - and on a number of facts, sabotage is carried out.


July 21, 2016, Wednesday.

On July 21, 2016 - I delivered a sample for the test in the window of St.-Mary's Lab. (See above what has happened to this analysis).


July 22, 2016, Friday - July 29, 2016, Friday.

On Friday, rather a serious operation on 2 teeth and a cyst removal took place (July 22, 2016).


But at first - let's followed the events step by step.


First, as I was convinced in the course of further visits to this clinic, it was necessary to wait here long hours, not less than 2-3 hours, and sometimes even longer. It seemed to me that the patients who looked more respectably (apparently from the high social group) were served quicker, but I am not absolutely confident about it.


The depression started to fade immediately after the litholopaxy operation, but, even with the increasing improvement, such a long waiting time rendered a demoralizing, devastating effect, enforced by depression. Besides, there was again the perineal dermatitis with ulcerations, and sitting in the waiting room for hours: became a real torture. This irritation and inflammation was, probably, triggered by stomach infection, which started again the recurrent diarrhea as well, and 2-4 hours of waiting (one or two times I had to wait up to 4 hours (!) in this clinic) - became already just intolerable. I told the secretaries about my problems and impossibility to wait so long, but I saw no compassion in their eyes and in their actions. They did not attempt to reduce for me the waiting time. The number of my visits to this clinic (4 times before the dental surgery on July 22) was also questionable: all preoperational procedures could be done in the same day.


Besides, after the urological operation passed only 2 weeks ago, it was contraindicated for me to sit and even stand so long, but I could not stand too long because of the dorsal pain and the problem of blood vessels, so it was necessary to sit continuously, and it was even more dangerous.


Dr. Dao and his assistants looked into my mouth, did an X-ray picture, and told that there is no cyst.


But I did not trust them and their conclusion, and, as it appeared later - not without justification.


Prior to the procedure of dental surgery, they offered to me an option to pay 200 dollars for a harmless (according to them) lulling anesthesia. It was not a "classic" general anesthesia, but a special "gas". The patient lulled to sleep by this gas - feels nothing.


But I answered that I don't have such sums of money. The reason of declining the "offer" was not only the financial reasoning (i.e. that, living on welfare since 2015, we (my wife and me) hardly made ends meet, and have no funds for additional expenses). Not less important was the fact that I wanted to be aware of what is going on and what is done to me, but it not to be an insensible doll in doctors' hands.


Then they did an extremely painful (Dr. Tenzer somehow manages to give such injections less painfully) injections in the gum. There was the infected abscess, and these pricks caused such pain that I nearly fainted.


I intended to ask to smear the gum by the Novocain solution before the injections, and - thereby - to anesthetize this area (considering the presence of the abscess) at least slightly. But because of the stressful situation and the fact that I was confused by the conversation about the payment for an "exclusive" anesthesia, I became puzzled - and forgot to state this request. But, really, did medics not understand and not realize what improbable pain will be caused by the injections directly into the abscess, and could not think of it?!


I had the watch before my eyes, on my wrist, and noticed that Dr. Dao returned to the office exactly in 5 minutes after the anesthesia injections. I was scared and shocked by the prospect of dental operation beginning prior to effective effect of anesthesia.


Having touched by the language the sore gum, I shuddered from pain. Anesthetic did not work fully yet.


Meanwhile, Dr. Dao was ready to start the operation, and, in response to my objections and complaints that anesthesia did not work yet, expressed doubts that I perceive the feelings adequately.


Then I pressed through the cheek on the gum, which swelled from abscess, and literally jumped up from the sharp pain, which slapped me as an electric shock.


Dr. Dao did not trust me, or pretended that he did not believe, having reacted as if I pretend to be paralyzed by pain. He knocked on those 2 teeth, which should be removed (because of the cyst and because I had no money for canal filling), but I could not feel an "additional" pain, because the furuncle ("gumboil") still so terribly tore after the pressing that - against the background of this pain - no other pain was felt any more. I, having passed from French to English, told Dr. Dao (literally): "I cannot feel an additional pain on the top of the pain already given by the abscess after I pressed on it" - but the doctor pretended that he somehow ignores my verbose explanation, whether considers it in general tongue-tied, whether just ignores my explanation.


Nevertheless, Dr. Dao conceded, and, having reported that he gives me extra time on the strengthening of the effects of anesthesia and that will return after a while, left the office (7 minutes after anesthesia injections).


There passed not less than 30 more minutes, and Dr. Dao did not come back, and I began to worry.


I needed to run in the toilet; the inflamed perineal area burned; the back and the head hurt; and everything muttered and raged in the stomach.


Nobody stayed in an office, except me. I had nobody to ask - what's going on and when the doctor returns.


Then I came out to the corridor, and began to look for those assistants who worked together with Dr. Dao.


Without seeing them, I moved off in searches for any of personnel, and came across an office where Dr. Dao did an operation to other patient at this time. This procedure (as far as I understood) was in full swing.


Having caught some medical worker on the corridor, I asked her to come into an office and to ask Dr. Dao how long he expects to be occupied with another patient and whether I will manage to go - during this time - to the toilet. But she hesitated to come into the office, and nothing left to me as, having propped up a back a wall to wait near the office.


However, another female medical worker passing by said that I am not allowed to stand here, banished me from there.


I went then to the toilet, returned back, but Dr. Dao was still busy by other patient.


I precisely recorded the time, and it appeared that - after Dr. Dao's exit from the office, when I insisted that the anesthesia does not work yet - there passed exactly 50 minutes: an hour without 3 minutes from the anesthesia injections.


Having returned back to "the" office, I waited for not less than 20-25 more minutes, having outright been frightened of the fact that the anesthesia will already not work anymore if the operation drags on. Several times asking the assistants coming by or looking into the office whether it happens so that - while I wait, the effect of anesthesia will weaken, and - closer to the end of the surgical procedure - will disappear in general, I worried more and more.


The answers to my questions - concerning the safe time for the beginning of operation after anesthesia injections - were the most contradictory.


When Dr. Dao began to pull out the 1-st tooth, there were only unpleasant sensations - pressure, etc., - but - gradually - I began to feel a considerable pain, which all the time amplified.


Dr. Dao and his 2 assistants had real difficulties to extract both teeth. They tried different technics and approaches, but nor the 1-st tooth, nor the 2-nd tooth could not be extracted in any way. They started to break them off and to remove the broken fragments; they have sawn and split up both teeth by special mechanical tools; I hope that they did not leave any splinters inside.


The whole dental operation lasted 40-50 minutes, and all this time I felt the intense pain, which sometimes punched like an electric shock, gradually amplifying, despite the anesthesia. Dr. Dao and his assistants understood very well that they are literally torturing their patient, because the surgery appeared to be too complicated and long lasted, and because the anesthesia did not work already.


Dr. Dao twice suggested to stop the operation, but I did not agree to finish it in a second attempt, in other day, but, and ordered to continue.


Was it not too much suffering for one person to have 2 rounds of tortures?


At the final stage, Dr. Dao told that there is an extensive cyst (he denied it before the operation; so, I was right) - and that now it is necessary to remove the cyst, too, and, for its incision, it is necessary to cut the gum very deeply, so the operation will go on.


They made havoc of the whole gum, and put innumerous stitches. And, long, insufferably long, they sewed it up. When they sewed it up, the pain continued to be intolerable. I already groaned and writhed from pain as though the "freezing" (anesthesia) completely or partially disappeared.


It was impossible to talk after such an operating, and I could not and ask about biopsy. Later, it became clear that neither biopsy, nor samples for microbiology nobody sent to a lab. The biopsy and infection tests were completely ignored.


After the surgery, it became clear that the operated gum hangs down along the area with 2 extracted teeth, at the level of surrounding healthy teeth though there has to be a hole.


Really, did the torture not end, and one more surgery will be required (or, maybe, not just one?).


I will not describe the torments and suffering until the wounds began to heal a little. There was something not normal, because a long strip of skin, with surgical threads on its end, hanging down of the middle of the gum instead of the extracted upper teeth, overhanging even below the lower teeth. Then (in 2 weeks) this strip came off.


I could not eat anything 4 or 5 days at all, and - at first - even to drink (the mouth did not open at all), and only for the 2-nd day could drink something like a light soup and juice.


The problem was also with the impossibility to drunk through a straw - as I knew about the danger of bleeding and infection (i.e. after exodontia, and other dental operations). The seams (threads) were not dissolving and did not disappear even 2 weeks later.


I kept the small plastic bags with ice almost 24 hours a day, because the bleeding (sometimes, so intensive that I was thinking to call 9-11) continued non-stop.


At first, the pain started to ease already on the 3-4-th day.


However, since Friday, July 29, 2016, the terribly injured gum suddenly began to hurt again, and this pain constantly amplified. I suffered from unbearable pain for 5-6 weeks, before some small improvements became sensitive.


I am sure that Dr. Dao fractured, at least, one alveoli bone (teethridge) of the upper jaw. The detailed exams, symptoms, and self-tests are described in popular and academic medical literature, and there is almost no doubts that Dr. Dao did an irreversible damage to my jaw and gum. The level of horrific pain during 2 months, and other elements of long suffering is also telling about the same. And Dr. Dao's lie in his reference to Dr. Tenzer is telling the same.


The epic of this dental operation's complications lasted for weeks, and it is not surprising that the depression and panic attacks threatened again to finish me finally:

1) fear of a new UT infection, ischuria, retention, obstruction, or failure of the digestive function, etc. (i.e. functions, which are kind of guaranteed to us and of which we do not think, such as breath, etc., suddenly appear questionable, and it is really horrific);

2) impossibility to sit normally, and, so to be engaged in creativity that would occupy my mind, my thoughts and feelings, and would provide the mental stability;

3) sudden aging and degradation of appearance, and, in particular, a cheek hole, quickly forming after exodontia and gum surgery on June 22, 2016;

4) from 2-nd of June, and, then, since June 21 (the drama with Septra, with all side-effects and complications; then - the (3-rd) new vertigo+ episode (2005, 2013 and, now, 2016), with a visit to ER (suspicion of mini-stroke) and Dr. Rowen's harassment, followed by whistle in ears, deterioration of hearing, difficulty to distinguish the speech, which is not connected with hearing degradation, and other symptoms of a possible ischemic episode: all this made my social life even more problematic and all my existence - pathetic;

5) for nearly half a year of unceasing diseases, our family's material-financial resources are exhausted because the help to me and solutions of my problems fell on my relatives with a heavy burden; while I cannot earn a cent.


I will refrain myself from condemning all actions of Dr. Dao.


My case was rather difficult, and the main guilt of my sufferings and falling a victim of mistreatment lays on the clinic and on sadistic practices of the Canadian state, which allow to kill and torture people for profit or because they have no money to pay for dental medical help.


It is possible that - from the medical point of view - Dr. Dao did many things (but, of course, not everything) correctly.


From the human point of view, the incident with anesthesia and the ambiguous "non-diagnostics" of the cyst (Dr. Dao recognized, finally, that I was right in my claim about the cyst only at the end of the dental operation, in spite of the fact that I began the very first visit to Dr. Dao with a conversation about the cyst), and a number of other dubious - from humanitarian and even ethical actions of Dr. Dao - are inexcusable.


Some of his actions can be written off for a certain rigid framework, in which, perhaps, the clinic put Dr. Dao (which is directed-managed not by him, but by Dr. Solomon (Benjamin) Saleh). But there were serious violations of medical ethics - whether because of the doctor, whether because of the clinic.


It is, first, the unnecessary X-ray of ALL teeth (moreover that my dentist, Dr. Tenzer, does not work in this clinic), which subjected me to excessive and harmful radiation (and it: despite the concern expressed by me and disagreement, and the statement for the fact that - few days ago - I had several dental X-rays in Dr. Tenzer's office).


Secondly, it is a refusal (whereas I was forced to pass UNNECESSARY X-ray of ALL teeth!) to administrate a special X-ray - CAD, - or an ultrasonic exam, which would allow to resolve the questionable diagnostic issue about the cyst.


Thirdly, this is the simultaneous treatment by Dr. Dao of two patients with difficult cases (it could be imposed on him by clinic, who knows) - almost at the same time.


And, fourthly, it is the reference, which was written out by Dr. Dao, in which the doctor gave an obviously incorrect, inveracious information.


And, fifthly, it is Dr. Dao's refusal to provide the follow ups treatment, to continue a therapy or a surgical intervention regarding the post-operational complications, and his offensive (and unethical) order (to me) not to come to this clinic any more.


On August 5, 2016, when I saw Dr. Dao last time (he actually ordered me not to come to this clinic anymore), he told that he will write a letter to Dr. Tenzer, who sent me to this clinic.


I asked if I allowed to copy this letter, and Dr. Dao kindly agreed.


Then I stated one more request: I asked to mention in this document about the cyst and about the gum surgery, and that the stitches were put on the gum.


However, when the secretary issued to me this document in a closed envelope, and I opened the envelope and read the content of the letter, I found NO WORD neither about the dental surgery, nor about the incision of the section of the gum, nor about the cyst, nor that the gum was sewn up.


Next day (or on one of the following days: I don't remember, and I did not find my notes about this) I came to Dr. Saleh clinic again, and asked Dr. Dao (having faced him somewhere on the sidelines) to change the content of his letter and to give the accurate information in his reference, but he refused to change the content of the document.


This is the letter (see below):


My translation from Canadian French:


To Dr. Tenzer from Dr. Dao.

I want to thank you for referring Lev to me. I examined your client on consultation, before exodontia. On July 22, 2016, we carried out a surgical procedure for exodontia number 15 and 16. The operation took place without complications, under a local anesthesia. If the additional reference is necessary, do not hesitate to address to me.

(Standard and polite farewell).


As we can see, not a single word was devoted in this reference to the surgery's details: how long did it lasted, and if that surgery included gum's incision.


Dr. Dao lied also that the operation ended without complications, because 3+-months-long healing of 2 extracted teeth accompanied by the VERY severe pain, a new infection (concerning this infection, Dr. Dao prescribed Azithromycin), and the serious defect of the gum (left by the operation) and of the cheek: these are still not all far-reaching complications.


The azithromycin prescribed by Dr. Dao in August, 2016 in connection with the complications of 2 teeth's removal and gum surgery around tooth number 16.


The refusal to specify the gum surgery (a deep cut and dissection (removal of its part) of the gum and removal of the cyst) in the reference: it was a very serious violation, committed by Dr. Dao, including 1) illegal concealment of medical information; 2) a lie concerning the purposes and the causes of a surgical procedure; 3) patient's exposure to danger by the concealment of medical information on new growths, details of the surgical procedure, and its possible complications.


Meanwhile, even by the remained (after the performed by Dr. Dao operation) defects anyone can draw a conclusion about a deep dissection of the gum.


On the place of the tooth number 16, the gum is 2.5 times lower than on the place of the neighbor (next) extracted tooth number 15.


[Running forward, I will add that this gum remained 2.5 times lower then the general gum level forever].


It is not excluded that, when Dr. Dao broke one or two alveolar jawbones while puling out the teeth, he understood it during the operation, and began to cut deeply the gum to get out the splinters.


In that case, he told lies to me, when he said at the final stage of operation that the cyst - after all - is there, and, therefore, it is necessary to cut very deeply the gum and to remove its piece - together with the cyst.


Actually, the fracture of jaw ossicles because of Dr. Dao's actions was the reason of the deep section of the gum, and he just covered up tracks, without having reported anything about the incident, and having lain concerning the reason of the additional operation.


Perhaps, the cyst was actually there, and the alveolar bones were broken, too, constituting both reasons for the gum very deep dissection surgery. But Dr. Dao concealed the second.


Except those evidences, which present the irreversible complications of the serious damaging dental operation on the gum (despite Dr. Dao's assurances that the gum "will reshape itself" (will anew be created), I have pictures, which I took as soon as I was able to open my mouth slightly more widely. These pictures - taken soon after the operation - show the scope and the depth of the section, and shows also the stitches, which were put to sew the ruined gum to the basis. No doubts that the professional experts could conclude the truth about the surgery - judging by these pictures what really happened.


A CAD scan and an anamnesis of a good dentist could confirm the assumption of the alveolar bones fracture, but the corrupt Montreal dentists, who put the cover up of their colleagues and the corporate solidarity higher than the safety and health of the patient, refused to do such a scan and to draw conclusions.


One of them, a top class expert, avoiding commenting on the assumption of the alveolar bones fracture and having refused to do the CAD scan, nevertheless, confirmed the gum bad injury in the area of the extracted tooth number 16, and an additional injury around the upper tooth number 17 by some dental tool (perhaps, it was the place of the emphasis). And this secondary gum injury - not only the area of the operation - began to heal only after several months. (3 months left only till more or less general healing started).


I could address to Dr. Tenzer, because, I think, he is one of just few people, who would do the CAD scan and would tell honestly whether there was a fracture, but - as he sent me to Dr. Saleh clinic, it was inconvenient to me to address to Dr. Tenzer (it was unethical).


I also did not want to set up Dr. Tenzer under a blow, because the influential Dr. Saleh, the chief of a big known clinic in a very rich area (serving rich clients), could - slightly that - crush Dr. Tenzer as some small insect and to smear him on a wall.


When I came to Dr. Saleh clinic for the first time, the secretaries appeared quite lovely ladies, and further behaved properly. (Only one of them, in my opinion, sometimes behaved familiarly and vulgarly). They told me to sit down in the waiting room and to wait, and immediately began to call somewhere by telephone. I assume that they called Dr. Solomon (Benjamin) Saleh, and that, having learned that the patient showed the back of his social benefit "carnet" - instead of a private insurance or money, - ordered to transfer me to Dr. Dao.


It is possible that everything was absolutely not as I suggested, and Dr. Saleh - is a wonderful person. But such a scenario logically arises from the entire idea of the finished picture of the atmosphere, which developed in this clinic and in my situation.


If the situation would have developed in a different (positive) way, then Dr. Saleh would realize that Dr. Tenzer did not refer me personally to him without a reason, and would occupy by my treatment himself.


However, as everything happened as it happened, then, Dr. Saleh stand up his colleague Dr. Tenzer (who referred his patient to him taking into account the complexity of the case), and also set up his colleague Dr. Dao, having charged him to take care of a case, which was too complicated for his insufficient experience, not to mention that he set up the patient who trusted him.


Among the nurses, some came across inconsiderate and rough: for example, that one that did the X-ray. But, despite everything that the operation did to me, Dr. Dao seemed to be human by nature, but bound and destroyed by the criminal corporate world.


He agreed to wait when I reported that freezing did not work yet. He offered twice (at first - after the removal of the 1-st tooth (tooth number 15), and then - before cutting the gum) to postpone the end of the operation and to transfer it to the next day: overwhelmed by the compassion to his patient and also (perhaps) because he was afraid not to cope with the removal the difficult 2-nd tooth, though - if there was already a fracture of an alveolus bone, and he wanted to cover up tracks - such a scenario was extremely unprofitable. (Possibly, I did a mistake, not agreeing to postpone the surgical procedure; but - in my state of that time, with a deep depression, - I just could not act differently: that the Sword of Damocles should hang over my head again - the nightmare postponed for days or weeks.


But also, Dr. Dao should not have undertaken the removal of 2 very difficult teeth with an abscess and a gum cyst if had not enough experience and confidence.


If I agreed to delay the continuation of the surgical procedure, and to reassign it to another (probably, very distant: it was necessary to wait until the 1-st wound heals) day, it was also extremely unprofitable to Dr. Dao, and would probably be perceived by his clinic as an emergency.


Everything that happened, happened probably not because (or not only) of non-professionalism or irresponsibility of Dr. Dao, but because he was exhausted - especially because he just finished another difficult operation, which he did to other patient, - and was not able to perform the next operation at the professional level by definition.


And, apparently, it was no choice of Dr. Dao, but it was the scenario, which was strictly imposed on him (probably).


He accepted to see me several times without registering an appointment and out of turn, sympathizing with my situation. He prescribed Azithromycin, though, besides, it was unprofitable to him - since this prescription pointed at surgery's complications, which he denied. And, at last, he just spoke with me humanly and behaved properly: not like many other doctors...


I tend to explain everything that happened - formally, because of Dr. Dao - by the rigid regalements and frameworks in the clinic, and by that fear, which developed in this clinic (which literally smothered in him the doctor) inside Dr. Dao, who was terrified by his eventual medical error, failure, accident, or even causeless claims of the rich spoiled patients. And, because I can feel the emanation, which contains the emotional and cogitative "cloud" around every person, I felt something very ominous that did not allow Dr. Dao to work peacefully, an emanation of some threat that literally hung over him; something, which could be even more terrifying than a ruined career. What could he been threatened with - in case of ruining clinic's reputation? Death? Kidnapping of his relatives? Deportation to some country where he could be tortured? Who knows? But my whole intuition, everything that I understand in people: everything confirmed my assumptions.


On the other hand, if - in Canada - the criminal practice of the tremendous concealment of medical errors and medical crimes did not run the show, Dr. Dao would be afraid of nothing, and would dare to reject the scenario of treatment (imposed on him) of two patients with difficult cases simultaneously (at the same time), being broken off between two medical offices.


And, if a threat did not hang over his head, he, perhaps, would do also the operation better, and there would be no most painful and "long-playing" complications?


If not mutual responsibility and if physicians were not exempted in Canada from any liability for their acts, then doctors would have the right to a medical mistake, and then any miss would not threaten with the end of their medical career.


In short time after the removal of 2 teeth and the cyst on the gum, I suddenly paid attention that practically in that area (the area of the operation) the cheek "fall in", causing a cosmetic defect at the level of ugliness and also the whole mouth became slightly contorted.


Of course, only experts able to establish the dependence between medical errors, made in Dr. Benjamin (Solomon) Saleh's clinic - and these front defects, but on time and on chronologic events clinic's role is obvious.


CHAPTER 10. August 2016.


2 - 5 August, 2016.

It is impossible to describe what I went through until the wounds began to heal a little.


The long strip of flesh, with the surgical threads on its end, got out of the middle of the gum, in the area of the extracted upper teeth, hanging over below the lower teeth.


Then this strip came off in general. Seams (threads) were not dissolved and did not disappear 3 or even 4 weeks. And, though the pain, as it seemed, became less intensive few days after the dental surgery, in one or one and a half week the extreme pain has built up again, becoming even stronger than before.


Since Friday, July 29, 2016, suddenly ALL ruined gums began to hurt again, and this pain constantly amplified.


On Tuesday, August 2, 2016, at 8:45, I paid an urgent visit to the clinic of Dr. Dao, and reported a rapid worsening of the gums' situation, and demanded an X-ray or CAD image of the area of the extracted teeth, and also of the next tooth (2-nd molar), asking to do something about my suffering and about the inflammation, pain, and - causing the general indisposition - acute deterioration.


The doctor told that everything is healing perfectly, and kicked me out home.


At home, I realized that there formed a tumor (a bump) around the next tooth (number 17; 2-nd molar), and that the gum around it hurts as an open wound.


Next day, Wednesday, August 3, 2016, I came to Dr. Dao again, and reported an infection on the operated gum and around the next tooth.


Dr. Dao examined the specified area, and told that he doubts that the next tooth is affected by infection (as well), but agreed to prescribe an antibiotic.


I asked Erythromycin, which the Dr. replaced with Azithromycin. The course of Azithromycin was prescribed for 5 days, but - in more than 48 hours - no improvement occurred; on the contrary, the situation became even worse.


My self-diagnosis "herpes simplex" was indirectly confirmed by circumstances: before and after the dental operation my wife "forced" me to eat at least a little bit of sweets to gain weight. (Also, after the dental operation, when I could not eat anything firm, we dissolved up to 2 portions of sweet ice-cream). And sweet provokes herpes.


This whole new saga with the "devil-may-care" attitude, and even deliberate negligence: what is it? A consequence of lack of money (instead of a payment check or a private insurance, I came with a social benefit's back-check granting the right for free services)? Or Dr. Solomon ("Benjamin") Saleh (the actual owner of this clinic) also intentionally induced Dr. Dao to provide me with the "cut-down" medical care, because wanted to signal Dr. Tenzer thereby: like, do not send me more impecunious patients?


And this new serious misfortune (again with a potential threat of further and painful complications and physical tortures!): just a new stratification on the whole lots of other terrible misfortunes.


The date of my older daughter's wedding came closer, and I grew cold with a thought: what if suddenly I will not be able to go to the wedding at all!


The most solemn, most joyful event in my life! And what will be to daughters and the wife!


August 3, 2016, Wednesday.

A new urgent visit to Dr. Dao, at 11:30.


It is possible to call Dr. Dao's attitude not quite "bad", but there was an element of ostentatious mistrust to my complaints and his attempts to dump all problems on my "imaginary" "unwillingness" to wait until "the wounds begin to heal", or, i.e. a criminal-minded attempt to dump his personal guilt on his victim.


August 5, 2016, Friday.

On Friday, August 5, 2016, it was the next - the last one - visit to Dr. Dao (10:50), concerning the ongoing pain and other complications (which could not be removed by any additional pain-killers), like the resumption of the ruined gum bleedings, ongoing infection, very painful hardenings and "kernels" ("grains") around the area of the performed dental operation, and other problems around the operated area.


I told Dr. Dao that I grope a serious and painful hardening in the operated gum, and also around the next (17-th) tooth, and, besides, 2 especially firm "kernels" in the middle of the operated gum (from the outer side), and also on a gum (sideways) around the next tooth.


I told that, if the antibiotic does not help, then, perhaps, it is a viral infection, and it is necessary to do a swab test, and to send it to a laboratory to know if it is herpes, human papillomavirus, or something worse.


He said that the 2 "kernels" are - supposedly - blisters (empyema, sores), but "there is nothing terrible", "everything will pass by itself".


He said that he guarantees: it is not oncology.


I answered that I doubt that the "grains" were "blisters", and that - even this is "not oncology" - the dental surgery's complications are very significant, and I demand a second opinion, an X-ray, ultrasound, and CAD exams of the affected area.


Besides, I said if even they are "blisters" (empyema) - it is the first and main symptom of a "herpes simplex" virus.


In reply, the Dr. Dao said that he, all the same, will not do a swab test, and, in general, refuses to exam and to assess my post-operative dental complications: to give me "a lesson" and to persuade me "not to come" "every day", which I regarded as an order not to come any more - and to seek the further assistance from Dr. Tenzer and in other dental clinics.


Later, in August, a red spot appeared in a corner of the upper lip, near the site of June's dental surgery, where 2 teeth were extracted and the operation on the gum was performed. I turned to a walk-in clinic, and there I was told that it is herpes. My assumptions were confirmed...


August 14, 2016.

Just now there passed nearly exactly 6 months from the moment of my nightmare's start.


The torture continues.


And all hopes that I will be left alone, that they will cease to pursue, surveille me, play dirty tricks, soil, carry out diversions, and will begin to provide an adequate medical help, at last: faded more and more...


The attitude towards me does not change, and it can be connected with the general global process, and, it seems, there are more and more populist governments in the world, and the real world-wide brown regime with a pre-war antagonistic confrontation was already almost set. They call each other "fascists", but, in reality, they are ALL Nazis, only divided by political and military blocks and their common aggressiveness and war-mongers' bloodthirst.


In reality, all "left" and neo-"liberal" governments remind the "right" governments, only with the opposite sign, having developed the cultural genocide against the European people and against the heritage of the Christian civilization.


The confrontation between different "camps" (as it was in 1940-s) - an inevitable consequence of this new breakthrough backward, towards the "dark times", and there is no moral superiority of the Canadian foreign policy over the policy of the totalitarian states also in mention.


Unlike the domestic policy of Canada, still rather more human than the policy of other parts of the global Anglo-Saxon empire, its foreign policy went to the side, opposite to the traditional policy of Canada after World War II, dictating to others the notorious totalitarian, tyrannical imperative of Bolsheviks: "Who not with us, that against us". In this ominous political situation, I am - a person, who is by himself, "for no one", but for the abstract humanitarian principles - I am in the most vulnerable situation.


And, because, besides, I write my works basically in Russian, bad guys already (at least therefore) see an alleged pro-Russian position in this alone (though any person older than a baby clearly realizes that I am by myself: neither pro-Russian, nor pro-Chinese, nor pro-Ukrainian, nor pro-Arab, or "pro-anything else" in my works and views, but a pure defender of humanitarian principles and an objector of any cultural or physical genocide against any group of people, and, first of all - against my white race). Not my ideological conception of "pro" or "contra", or something else, but my strong position of a defender of peace and cooperation between the nations, and my opposition to a possible war between the people of the white race (instigated by the adepts of a bloodthirsty cult, the most bitter enemies of the Christian religion and pre-Christian European worships, and members of secret and half-secret societies): this infuriated monsters against me and against my peacekeeping activity.


The drama of an urological infection; dermatological infection; gastrointestinal infection (I endured almost a lethal colitis); nearly 4-monthly epic of the cysto-litholopaxy procedure, and all urological complications of the deliberate damage inflicted by Dr. Morris and other doctors; deliberate post-operative damage, inflicted by 1 or 2 members of the medical staff, including a post-operative unit nurse, who expelled me from the hospital right after the surgery with all visible symptoms of the bladder perforation; the ichuria (retention-obstruction: the most terrible experience); 7 outbreaks of a life-threatening Enterococci infection; post-cystoscopy's life-threatening complication in the situation, when the medical help was sabotaged; possible short ischemia of the right half of a brain (mini stroke); deep depression; heart attack: all these and many other unfortunate events (it is not possible even to mention everything): are the result of the deliberate ruination of my health.


Since July 22, 2016, there is a new spiral of the tortures: the inhumanly and neglected performed dental surgery and removal of 2 teeth, which caused next unspeakable suffering; and the wounds don't heal and not treated, and, concerning the post-operational infection, I receive no help. The gum around the 17 tooth, next to the site of operation, hurts; and also the gum higher than the operation's site hurts, and, except the common painful area, it is possible to grope 2 especially painful "kernels": abscesses or tumors, or something else.


But a swab test, biopsy, X-Ray, CAD, and other tests were not done; diagnosis have not been announced; a short (5-days) treatment by antibiotics gave nothing (I insisted on different antibiotics); and no treatment provided.


Meanwhile, concerning other problems, my family doctor administrated a transrectal scan, but, in the hospital - instead of it (July 29, 2016) they did a usual abdominal-pelvic ultrasound. But even this ultrasound was, rather, actually sabotaged, because it was claimed in this ultrasound's report that, allegedly, liver, kidneys, gallbladder, etc. - are "unremarkable", and aorta and pancreas are "not visible"!


(The more detailed description of what exactly happened is given in the group of comments about a number of tests and exams: see the records on Wednesday, July 20, 2016).


The only thing that was "visible" and "remarkable" - there were the same details that already have been stored in the database on former ultrasounds (from where the whole report was rewritten). Therefore, it is even impossible to judge about the BPE, because just the same indicator already presented in one of former ultrasound reports, and was probably simply rewritten from there.


This is a very ominous turn.


Some sums of money sent by the admirers of my musical and literary works from Italy, Russia, and Austria, I already spent on private medical procedures, and any other money postal orders are not expected. Besides, the last 2 money orders, which were sent from Italy, just vanished somewhere, probably, confiscated by international political gangsters, or by the Canadian government, and, if the second assumption is correct, it signifies that in the near future the Canadian Harper-Trudeau anti-libertarian regime will employ the confiscation of money collected by fundraisers for protests, demonstrations, or for political opposition's actions...


The technician, who was carrying out the ultrasonography exam, checked everything in the most thorough way, including the liver and the right kidney, commenting what she's seeing (some liver abnormalities (so-called "fat liver), and so on); and I know that she is a good expert), so, consequently, there are no doubts that there were some "not unremarkable" details, and that there was no obstruction to see the abdominal area clearly, and, thus, the report's claim is not correctly feasible.


Then the technician told me not the leave the examination office, because the doctor-radiologist will come for carrying out some additional manipulations. But nobody came. This was also very strange. It seems that the diagnostics is carried out very precisely and carefully - only not for me and not for my doctors, but for someone else... Only they, those "others": probably, the only people, who receive the correct results of my diagnostic procedures.


(See below)


The "transrectal scan" (July 29, 2016; on requisition of my family doctor) once again was made a "usual" ultrasound, and, besides, with "zero" effectiveness, because "it is looked through nothing", as everything (besides 2 already known problems) was "unremarkable" (while other ultrasounds, which I passed in alternative or in private radiologes, clearly showed a number of departures from the norm) or "not visible".


August 15, 2016, Monday.

On Monday, August 15, 2016, went (on foot) to Verdun Hospital where passed tests and also walked to recording studios in St.-Henry and St. Jacques West neighborhoods, where rehearsed with Tania (the violinist) for recording a piece of music for my daughter's wedding (I composed this music), and - when we came back home, and I turned on the computer, - a message jumped out on the screen "activate Windows... for activation...", etc.


So, I passed the laboratory tests on August 15, 2016, in the French Verdun Hospital, but the test of microbiology culture was not done, under that supposedly pretext that the biochemical analysis did not assume an infection. But the laboratories should not "reduce" doctor's requisition's indications, and "to dispute" a medical prescription. The laboratory has to carry out everything that the doctor specified in the requisition on the analysis.


(See below)


August 17, 2016.

The operated gum still causes an intolerable pain. It is impossible to touch it not only by finger, but even by the tongue. I am not able to eat normally.


August 18, 2016, Thursday.

On Thursday, August 18, 2016, I had a rendezvous with the gastroenterologist, Dr. Szego, appointed at 9:15 in the morning.


As always, it was necessary to spend the whole day in Royal Victoria Hospital, literally till the afternoon. This new mega-hospital is overcrowded, and the medical care here is million times worse than in the old Royal Victoria Hospital. It was, certainly, built by crooks and money-launderers, for no other reasons as mega-scam, which did not improve the situation in the domain of the public health care, but, on the contrary, just worsened it.


The police are intercepting me again - at the previous level. Since May 17, 2016, they, it seems, announced a timeout, but now everything returned into place. Police escorts, hails from police cars, stoppings and interrogations (where I go, why, in what occasion), etc. are there again.


There were several new shutdowns of the Internet and phone. Certainly, not accidental.


A virus was sent (via the Internet connection in our apartment), which practically destroyed a very expensive and prestigious laptop-computer of my oldest daughter. With the problems with the guarantee (a typical vendors-crooks' practice in last 4 years, in the situation when all states are waging an undeclared was on consumers), it was necessary flushing bios and to undertake other risky operations. I sat over this computer 48 hours, without unbending my back and without going to bed. It was necessary to rescue - at first - the files from the hard drive, then to restore the system from the backup, then to reinstall programs, etc. In the end of this operation, my vision became blurry. Maybe, the virus was sent not occasionally to our household?


August 23, 2016, Tuesday.

On Tuesday, August 23, 2016, I passed the audio-test (hearing exam) at St. Mary's Hospital, appointed at 9:00 in the morning, in the office B-272.


This test was appointed by Dr. Sejean, who sees his patients at his private office on Queen Mary Street, and in policlinic of St.-Mary Hospital's OPD clinic (C) 7th Floor).


This otolaryngologist met me hostilely already from the very first time, when he saw me at his private office on Queen Mary Avenue.


Perhaps, it was somehow connected with Dr. Morris, or with my complaints to the ombudsman of the St. Mary's Hospital, or with something else that this doctor knows about me. Otherwise, it is impossible to explain his aggressive hostility, almost undisguised hatred in any way.


Therefore, I tried to pass to other otolaryngologist for a long time, but, as well as in a case with Dr. Morris, it appeared not so simply.


At the end of November - beginning of December, 2016, I endured one of the most painful and tragic periods in my life.


The "vague" (since it could not solve my problems by definition) litholopaxy operation (first, left a number of complications; and, secondly, initially not solving all problems, which resulted from the unethical and prejudice actions of the urologist, Dr. Morris, and other doctors, and medical institutions); waiting for the following urological operation and stay in uncertainty concerning its date and possible results or consequences; the whole new drama of the painful and devastating dental surgery, which left a number of serious complications and injuries, with a probable fault of Dr. Saleh's clinic regarding this drama); heavy depression provoked by actions of Dr. Morris and other doctors, and crimes committed against my health in several emergency departments, and in other departments of Montreal hospitals); further deterioration of my vision and hearing, and the development of complications after the traumas (possible brain injuries) caused by inexplicable cases on November 3, 2005; January 7, 2013; and on June 21, 2016, and their consequences, including vitreous body detachment and deterioration of vision and hearing; new (after November 3, 2005; January 7, 2013; June 21, 2016) sharp deterioration in hearing provoked by the events on January 7, 2013 and June 21, 2016, and 3 incidents with an inexplicable vertigo and brutal, cruel treatment and sabotage in emergency departments; almost total loss of voice, which was followed by episodes, when (for the unknown reasons) the nose use to be "bunged up" (blocked); and many other health problems: all this not only caused the demoralizing, oppressing impacts on my whole life, but also interfered with my normal functioning and communication with people, undermining the bases of my human existence.


It was a great human tragedy developing against the background of the sadistic attitude to my health problems in some medical institutions and public services, continuation of persecution by police, and cruel provocations, which inhumanity has amplified my depression and the declining of the general state of health.


This whole mountain of personal misfortune was amplified even more by my professional tragedy, as, for a musician, the loss of hearing is the end of everything that filled existence with great light of creativity, and allowed to be reconciled somehow with even a saddest reality.


I tried to explain all this in my letter to Dr. Sejean after his very first attempt to shift the fault for his own unwillingness to see me and to provide medical help - on his patient (on me).


In my letter to Dr. Sejean, I did not mention my claims to doctors and medical institutions.


I even handed to Dr. Sejean a computer disk with the records of my own musical compositions, and with my interpretation of piano classical music.


But this not only did not soften a cruel attitude of Dr. Sejean, but, on the contrary, after that letter, he began to treat me with a bigger rage and cruelty. If he was enraged because the public health system did not allow him to treat me properly and to address adequately to my problems, he had to explain this to me honestly, because he surely understand who I am, and, then, it is evidently, that I would not denounce him.


Already at the first meeting, seeing his unwillingness to treat me, I told him that if he does not want to see me among his patients, he is obliged to refer me to another specialist otolaryngologist, but Dr. Sejean left my demands without any answer.


[See the rest of the report on Dr. Sejean's "treatment" in the series "Who Destroyed My Vision and Hearing", which is a part of this work.]


August 24, 2016, Wednesday.

The audiology - a difficult and comprehensive hearing exam - showed that I need a hearing aid: my hearing decreases for 40 percent against the background of even a slightest background noise; the high-pitched sounds were gone for my ears; and I hear only average and low frequencies sounds. For me, the musician, it is a verdict.


On August 25, 2016, Thursday.

The perineal dermatitis ones again added itself to my sores - with an acute inflammation and ulcerations (I cannot sit normally again), beside the dangerous colitis (after poisoning by Clindamycin (antibiotic), which was prescribed by the dentist.


The governmental and International policy on antibiotics force doctors to prescribe different antibiotics, instead of one that surely helps (they afraid that the microorganisms will adjust to the same medication, and will mutate). Erythromycin always helped me, without any exclusion, for years, and, probably, this fact paradoxically forced the dentist to change it for Clindamycin.


An infection, either a cyst, or a fracture of alveolar bones, or a bone piece, which remained in the gum, or something else is still ignored by dentists after the dental surgery in July, 2016.


The page with the microbiology culture report, i.e. a test on bacterium, is "missing" again in the latest Ur. analysis' result. It is already the 5-th time of microbiology culture disappearance lately (within last 1.5 years). (See below)


Formally, it is necessary to understand it so that the test for microbiology culture was considered (at THIS TIME) non-relevant, under the pretext of lack of deviations in the physical and chemical analysis (density, specific weight - was not even considered). But, first, it does not exclude an infection for all 100 percent; secondly, the quantity of infectious microorganisms on the standard volume of suspension can just be reduced; thirdly, sometimes (let seldom or never) the stated dependence (between the results of the physical and chemical analysis and an infection) is not so expressed; fourthly, the lack of such dependence can be observed at the very beginning of an infection, when a result on microbiology culture is already positive, but its influence on physical and chemical structure did not occur yet; and, at last, fifthly, medical prescriptions cannot (and should not) be disputed by the laboratories and put into dependence on any given preliminary conditions: otherwise - there will be a continuous arbitrariness, chaos and confusion. Plus, for a patient with a long-long history of UT innumerous infection, such a practice of laboratories is not acceptable.


In my case, the long history of microbiology culture sabotage during more than 15 years, such a policy can provoke a laboratory to change arbitrary (falsify) the physic-chemical test's report, just to have a formal excuse not to carry out the microbiology culture test.


All this means an obvious sabotage - by an order of some very high instance, in comparison with which the level of hospital's highest management: no more than a tiny hillock...


At my request, one doctor found out what happened to the ultrasound's report (ultras. from 29 July, 2016).


It turned out that everything was exactly as I assumed.


Presumably, all digital information of scanning was gone, and the ultrasound's report was composed on the bases of few last abdominal and abdominal-pelvic ultrasounds done in the same hospital.


The chronic loss of diagnostics' results is a frightening story. And I am really afraid.


And the fear - is a source of depression and suppression of the immune system.


Without diagnostics I will die. I try to keep as long as I can.


August 27, 2016, Saturday.

I visited an alternative dentist, in another clinic.


This one told me that - during the gum surgery other place was, probably, touched and affected, and the operation ended having left a wound there (after the tooth number 17).


He said that something, which - to the touch and by the form - reminds a certain kernel: is not a cyst, not a tumor, not an abscess, but a swollen and inflamed scar, which, say, will begin to heal slowly but inevitably.


THIS dentist, too, refused to do a swab test and CAD.


He told that my free public medical insurance does not cover either that, or other test.


When I asked whether he is sure that it is a scar - he told that it is only an assumption.


THIS clinic (as well) performed the X-ray of ALL teeth as a preliminary condition of an assessment by the doctor, though they knew that

1) the dental X-ray - is one of the most harmful;

2) I already did such X-rays twice for the last 2 months, and 4 times during last 3 months;

3) I came not for dental care, but only for one-time consultation; and

4) they did not receive my consent (I warned that I do not give my consent to X-ray of ALL teeth, but they just did not leave another option for me).


If - against the background of other vision problems (vitreous body detachment, etc.) a cataract will also begin to develop - it can be their "merit". And cataract is not an only possible side-effect of too frequent dental X-rays.


I assume that dental clinics do X-rays of ALL teeth of new patients by definition not on the line of medical and health-related reasons, but for the reasons of the pure espionage, collecting confidential information, and committing an illegal invasion into private life of citizens.


Meanwhile - in addition to all other new problems - a serious depression continues to develop again, more and more tormenting. This development is a direct response to the new "dental drama" and the cruelty of Canadian dental policy involving the situation of millions of less privileged citizens. And, obviously, the new recurrence of depression is the psychic's reaction to Dr. Dao's or / and his clinic's inhuman approach.


The depression is a threat in itself, because if not to win against it or not to sit down on tablets: it can lead to a stroke, a heart attack, or to cause cancer because the depression suppresses the immune system...


Meanwhile, Flomax works worse and worse. It will inevitably provoke (sooner or later) new series of infection and - then - bladder stones again. And the most terrible is if the catheter would be inevitable again (which is not excluded: for a long time).


I try to fight as soon as I can.


August 29, 2016, Monday.

On Monday, August 29, 2016, I passed an additional test, to which Dr. El-Hakim directed me.


It was talked (except all the rest) of a question of urgency of the following urological operation.


It is that test (uroflow), on I systematically asked Dr. Morris (among my other requests), and which he systematically rejected.


I passed this test in Lakeshore Hospital, approximately in 20 km from Montreal.


August 31, 2016, Wednesday.

On Wednesday, August 31, 2016 - one day after the uroflow test - I was on rendezvous (it was appointed at 14:30) with the non-Montreal urologist, Dr. El-Hakim.


We discussed 5 important issues.


Dr. El-Hakim warned again (as in 2010 or 2011) that a urological surgery is more secure if a surgeon is working in the hospital of this operation's destination. He expressed his regrets about the complications after the recent litholopaxy surgery, and, without repudiating his self-accusation (I am sure that Dr. El-Hakim brilliantly performed the operation, and bears no personal guilt, but accused himself for the reason of his decency and unwillingness to switch the guilt on others), hinted that the conditions of a non-planned and hectic surgery (and, probably, actions of 1 or 2 members of the medical staff) contributed to complications. His indirect hint could be decoded as an advice to persuade another surgeon from Montreal (who works in one of the major hospitals) to do the operation.


He said that I am now ready physically for the next operation, which is needed urgently, but, he said, the Lakeshore hospital might delay the date of the surgery "forever". It he was clear that he (without saying about it directly) is recommending to use all my connections and abilities for arranging the surgery in a different hospital, with a different surgeon.


Then, he said, there are different types of this surgery, but we can leave this question for one of the next appointments.


The forth problem was resolved instantly: when I expressed my concern about a possible pre-operational cystoscopy, Dr. El-Hakim said that it is not necessary at all, and that the planned surgery can be performed without any preceding intrusive procedure.


The fifth issue was the connection between suggested problems of the low intestines - and urological problems (the problem, which even Dr. Morris, finally, recognized at the end of his treatment, referring me to Dr. Kinnik). He said that Dr. Szego is too old to perform a surgery, but, when I mentioned Dr. Kinnick, he formally said that Dr. Kinnick is a very good specialist, but by mimic, gestures, and intonation, implied that this doctor is "not good" for me, for some reasons.


The most important, stressed Dr. El-Hakim, is to have an opportunity for the surgery as soon as possible, but this is not under his control.


CHAPTER 11. September-November 2016.


SEPTEMBER, 2016.


September 7, 2016, Wednesday.

On Wednesday, it was my last meeting with Dr. Sejean.

[I described what occurred during and after this appointment in a separate series Who Destroyed My Vision and Heating (see among the books of this work)].


After this rendezvous, I decided not to see this doctor any more.


Omitting the details of unethical and uncompassionate actions of Dr. Sejean here, in this wide report about my urologic saga, I'll concentrate on the most central for THIS book: stressed by Dr. Sejean's actions, shocked by his behavior, and - not excluded - experiencing some harm that Dr. Sejean did to me when inserted his tube deeply into my nose, I felt a significant indisposition. Something was not OK. When I went down to the metro station, I felt an unusual palpitation and heart pain; experienced momentary darkness in my eyes from time to time; and then I suddenly began to choke, and nearly fainted.


This indisposition attack continued inside the metro station Snowdon, and then - to the station Lionel Groux, where I began to breath easier.


I do not know what Dr. Sejean did to me, besides provoking an unusual stress (even a shock) by his behavior, but I never before had such a reaction to someone's defiant actions, and I never had such a reaction to a tube insertion into my nose by an otolaryngologist. Therefore, this indisposition attack seemed very strange and suspicious.


The sabotage of Dr. Sejean, who was blocking any effective otolaryngologist's help for 2 years, and his actions during the last rendezvous: again, generated a depression, which came back after a short period of almost complete remission.


It occurred in the heat of a new drama: the closed-angle syndrome provoked glaucoma; the iridotomy did not help; the corners did not open; the intraocular pressure was not kept under control after iridotomy laser surgery and Xalatan prescription; and the iridotomy provoked cataract, led to a sharp degradation of my vision, problems of night vision, wild disphotopsia, and only destroyed my vision even more.


After that wild affair at Dr. Sejean's office, the intraocular pressure began to jump up even more, my vision sharply worsened, and other problems became aggravated. The depression, which already almost receded, also returned holding 2 or 3 weeks. Heartaches also returned.


However, the most frightening complications after my visit to Dr. Sejean were: nausea; pain in the area under the solar plexus; sensation of heaviness and pain under the ribs; and then severe pain all over the stomach. These symptoms have materialized 2 hours after the rendezvous with Dr. Sejean.


September 9, 2016, Thursday.

On Friday, September 9, 2016, I came (by 9:30) to my family doctor's office concerning ongoing diarrhea and other problems.


He administrated 2 appropriate (from my point of view) laboratory tests.


It was a striking contrast in comparison with the behavior and actions of Dr. Sejean.


However, my family doctor insisted that I should address to St. Marry Hospital's laboratory, and this laboratory could not produce adequate and correct results, which follows from a number of the facts described in this chronicle.


Therefore, my family doctor's fault in the failure of many of his efforts.


OCTOBER, 2016.


October 12, 2016, Wednesday.

On October 12, 2016, I paid an unplanned visit to the family doctor (an emergency rendezvous).


I asked him about administrating a blood test [having assumed the following components: ALT, ALP, AST, PT/INR, aPTT, Amylase, Lipase, Cholinesterase, Transferase, Bilirubin (total & direct), Gamma-Glutamyl, Albumine, Glucose].


I told that the reason for such test can be the fact that - in the last one month - there was: nausea; then pain in the area under the solar plexus; heaviness and pain under the ribs at once; then - severe pain all over the stomach.


I asked also whether he can send me for pancreas and duodenum exams, including an ultrasound.


However, all my requests were refused...


October 20, 2016, Thursday.

I made every effort not to destroy my older daughter's wedding, and, despite depression, I managed it.


It was my biggest achievement.


I hoped that - after my daughter's wedding - my psychological state will improve, but it did not occur.


The depression returned moreover even more gloomy.


I tried several depression medicines, but the depression becomes only worse from every of them. However, unlike the previous period, before the 1-st urological surgery (approximately, since July, 2016, when the depression was completely established), now I come back to the normal state for several days or for 2-3 weeks from time to time, but - then - again, I plunge into the nightmare.


And it - if not worse than any pain and physical infirmity, then, at least, is comparable...


I assume that here also the biochemical processes are involved, caused by supersaturation of my organism by antibiotics and toxins - in connection with the systemic disease: possibly, some problem with liver, kidneys and pancreas.


I already had 2 attacks of nausea, pain slightly below the solar plexus, then under the ribs on the right side, then pain all over the stomach. There are also other symptoms.


I turned to my family doctor, asked the blood test for clarification of liver condition, etc.


He REFUSED it!


And, then, it is worse and worse with the finances. I could not even buy any more drugs, which somehow hold me afloat.


We went to a country house of my familiar acquaintances. By a very strange and rare randomness, my older daughter, looking for chalet for few days, by chance found the chalet of people, whom I already used to know. These people let out the chalet even to just "summer residents" from time to time (for money): possibly, for a reason of not leaving the house empty and to maintain its safety. Well, and that the house should paid off.


We paid a very moderate, insignificant prize. Of course, it was necessary to compensate (to the owners) heating for 3 days, and some other expenses (we had the right to use all ware, beds, etc.). This is about 110 km from Montreal, strictly to the North.


4 days in the wild forest dispersed my depression, and, since then, it started to disappear.


There is no wish to think about the health issues.


Another urological operation is necessary urgently; I try to drive away the thoughts of it - otherwise the shaky psychological basis will collapse completely.


There is no wish to think also what, maybe, would happen if I was not a patient of Dr. Morris, but a patient of another Montreal urologist, and the operation appointed to May would not be delayed, and the surgery would be done in Montreal, in a city hospital, where the medical level is several times higher, and where a litholopaxy surgery would not leave serious complications and the post-operational catheter would not be necessary. If I was a patient not of Dr. Morris, then, maybe, another - additional - operation would not be needed at all.


But - immediately - other thoughts interrupts: that already, by the beginning of 2015 (and, maybe, earlier), what the medical sabotage and repressions in the totalitarian style did - was already irreversible, and would demand an operational intervention anyways; that only such an extraordinary person as Dr. El-Hakim could save me from greater troubles; and that - if to believe in destiny - then all this was obviously predetermined, and - wherever would the operation performed - it would change nothing...


October 25, 2016, Tuesday.

Still badly...


After the depletion, 5-10 more minutes it exudes; at a pinch - it is necessary to run this very minute. Though buy pampers (I do not know - how they are called now in Russia).


During the same procedure, it is felt pain as though something locks and disturbs many times per day. All these "delights" did not present before the lithophany operation, and, so, they are some complications whether from the operation, whether from the roughly put postoperative catheter. More probably - the second.


October 26, 2016, Wednesday.

On October 26, 2016 (10:15): I had a planned visit to the rheumatologist, Dr. Anna Khananyan, who moved from downtown to policlinic to the address: 5950 Cote-des-Neiges, Nr. 220.


I understood that - in this policlinic, having much less opportunities and rights than at her office on St. Catherine Street, Dr. Anna Khananyan cannot provide such an adequate help as where she was accepting patients earlier.


Something serious befell also her, besides moving to this office.


I saw - by her changed shape, and on her face - that she has some big troubles: whether health problems, whether any other dramatic events, and did not begin to insist on broader exams, which could produce, at last, a concrete diagnosis and establish the explanation of the arthritis origins, which - in 14 years of rather a responsible approach (in general) to this problem by Dr. Krasny, by my family doctor, and by Dr. Anna Khananyan, - did not give the answer to these questions yet.


All 3 doctors did much for me, and it is thanks to them, that, despite the arthritis, I - after all - kept still full functionality and autonomy, and could prevent deformation of bones and joints (though I did much more in this direction than the vast majority of ordinary patients).


Dr. Khananyan sent me to X-ray and ultrasound tests.


Running forward: soon Dr. Anna Khananyan, for unknown reasons, moved to United States. Something very serious happened to her or to her family. It is a pity. She was an excellent doctor and a very good person.


NOVEMBER, 2016.


November 7, 2016, Monday.

On November 7, 2016, I was on reception at non-Montreal urologist, Dr. El-Hakim (it was appointed at 8:20).


He told that the operation, most likely, will be performed in January of the next year (2017), but that I must be ready (for operation) in any day since "it is better if it would be an operation, which is not planned in advance (long before)".


I did not begin to ask - why it is "better": because the answer could be very terrible and scary if this doctor would read it. Two of the number of eventual reasons could be that a) the hospital would "withhold" a "planned" surgery forever, until irreversible damage will turn me into a dying vegetable creature, or b) if the authorities would know the date of the surgery in advance, some sabotage methods could be elaborated in advance. So, it was better not to raise questions, because the office of Dr. El-Hakim could be tapped.


Perhaps, he understood everything that happens to me, and realized - what risk he takes. Therefore, an unplanned operation has reduced a risk not only for me, but also for him as well.


Also operation itself was discussed: only to expand the uterus pass-outlet, or also to do a resection. But then one more operation could be necessary later. Till November, the 1-st option was my decision, but now I decided that it is necessary - "at one go" - to do one and another, and, taking a pencil and a piece of paper, drew myself (to the doctor) the scheme of the operation with the plan of internal organs and the scenario of the surgery on canal's expansion in the place where its "tube" passes through the uterus "orange", and also on uterus resection in a specific area (under my own assumption that, even without a significant enlargement, the uterus is stuck out in one direction, and complicates the outflow, especially as - from time to time - the hypertrophy increases due to infections, abscess, etc.).


The doctor immediately got out his own sketch, which he outlined before my arrival, and we compared both drawings. They completely coincided! Thus, the operation, which I planned and which drew on a sheet of paper (identical to the scheme, which, without arranging with me, independently was represented by the doctor) was coming.


After that, the doctor took out one more list of paper, and drew a new drawing, more detailed, underlying the areas and details where something was whether "corrected" (in comparison with our first drawings), whether simply - due to a bigger refining - was slightly differing of mine.


I knew that I take a bigger risk because of the depression, the lowered blood pressure at that time, low platelets, and cardiovascular and other problems, which increased risk several times.


But, being afraid that later it can be already too late, I made up my mind to this step...


November 8, 2016, Tuesday.

I visited the gastroenterologist, Dr. Szego (the rendezvous was appointed at 15:00, but, as usual, I stayed till the late evening).


The doctor was in a bad mood that time; possibly, it was just a melancholy or sickness, but, it is also not excluded, someone spoke to him about me.


He oddly ignored my complaints, but spoke with me by an unusual voice, and answered to my replies not as always.


November 16, 2016, Wednesday.

I called Dr. Tenzer, the dentist, and agreed with him about the removal of 2 other teeth, because I have no money for their treatment.


The rendezvous for this procedure was appointed to November 18.


The reason for my decision to pull out the tooth by Dr. Tenzer was connected to the drama, which occurred at Dr. Saleh's specialized clinic, where, because of negligent and, possibly, discrimination of less privileged patients, I endured serious complications, dental injuries, and 4 months of unbearable suffering, while the clinic, instead of healing the traumas and medically compensating the damage, just kicked me out. I considered that, maybe, it is better to pull out the tooth at Dr. Tenzer's office: even if a specialized clinic has more opportunities and doctors, skilled in this particular procedure, the inhuman treatment eliminates all the advantaged for patients like me.


I also visited my family doctor (the visit was appointed at 10:15 in the morning).


On the same day, I passed tests in the laboratory of St. Mary's Hospital.


I had neither forces, nor will to go to other hospital - though there is no trust left in the adequacy of MY analyses' results in THIS hospital. I just went there - because it was the closest laboratory from the bureau of my family doctor, and it was not necessary to go anywhere any more...


November 17, 2016, Thursday.

On November 16 and 17, 2016, after the dental epic, visits to dentists, and - the main thing - IMMEDIATELY (!) after my yesterday's phone call to Dr. Tenzer (with whom I agreed upon an occasion of the removal of teeth appointed to November 18, 2016) I began to be literally bombed by spam such as:


Date: 17 Nov 2016 20:12:48 +0800 [17/11/16 7:12:48 EST]

From: phqlfi

To: leog@total.net

Subject: Dental operating table

Part(s): 2.1?? 2.png 35 KB

Download All Attachments (in .zip file)

Download All Attachments (in .zip file)

1 unnamed 11 KB


Dear Sir or Madam,

We supply baby incubator,

surgical light and dental chair with competitive pric.

Best profit will be good for your market.

If you have interested, pls call us.

Best regards,

Roland,

Dental chair professional

manufactuer

MEDICAL INSTRUMENTS CO.LTD

2016/11/17


If a spam with dental chairs for surgeries advertising, or with dentists-surgeons advertising is suddenly - unexpectedly - send to a person, to whom the procedure for teeth removal is appointed for tomorrow: it cannot be just accidently or "mere coincidence". And it is very scary.


It is not excluded that something similar was thrown - after my phone call - also to Dr. Tenzer, rendezvous with whom for the removal of 2 teeth is appointed for November 18, 2016, or even something connected with me, or something else even worse, like a threat that could enrage him and provoke his nervousness and new tormenting consequences for me...


November 18, 2016, Friday.

On Friday, November 18, 2016, I came to my permanent dentist, Dr. Tenzer. (The procedure was appointed at 8:30 in the morning).


My wife drove me to Dr. Tenzer, and waited for me, but outside of his office, in the downstairs cafeteria.


She did not want to see him, not telling - why.


During our first 7 or 8 years in Montreal, we all (my wife and my daughters as well) were Dr. Tenzer's patients. Maybe, she was feeling some kind of "after-taste", feeling of resentment; I don't know. But her absent served a bad service for my case, in my present situation, and, it is possible that her presence in Dr. Tenzer's office could change a lot for a better outcome.


From the very first minute in Dr. Tenzer's office, everything went upside down today.


This time, there happened several unusual things.


First of all, the secretary opened not mine, but someone else's file in the computer, and only then noticed that this file, in contradiction with its content, had my name in its attributes.


One of Dr. Tenzer's assistants - at first - made X-ray not of that tooth, which was necessary to scan. It is already an extreme occurrence.


Running forward, it is also necessary to add that - as soon as I got to Dr. Tenzer's assistant, who works with him longer than others, - I noticed sudden and radical changes in her attitude towards me. She (Dr. Tenzer's chief assistant) examined me with shivering hands. This was the 2-nd time in this year, when I noticed inexplicable changes in her attitude towards me.


When I "too slowly" (in her view) reacted to her command to open the mouth more widely, she began shouting and screaming at me (which never happened before).


This always polite, friendly and attentive (and, apparently, kind at heart) woman of Italian (or Jewish-Italian) origins: felt ill at ease now. (Maybe, someone conducted a discussion about me with her?).


Since then, her attitude towards me has sharply changed.


(Running forward: because of her, I had to leave - in 2018 - Dr. Tenzer, because - as I consider - through her fault, the removal of one of the lower teeth went to an excess, and led to serious complications).


She gave - on November 18, 2016 - an anesthesia injection (if I mixed nothing in the records: it is important), and - here it is surprising! - freezing did not work as necessary, and - during the removal of two upper teeth on the left side - I at some point - felt nearly a pain shock. Both pulling out tooth this time they drilled, and crumbled, and cut the gum... This was the next nightmare...


One more unusual detail: for the first time since 1995, they demanded from me to sign a paper on consent (for the removal of two teeth) [the statement of consent] - where it was also written that I am informed of all risks of this procedure, etc. I never signed a similar paper of consent in Dr. Tenzer's office. My consent was always given verbally, because Dr. Tenzer and me: we always trusted each other. However, 3 or 4 times, Dr. Tenzer presented me the consent agreement just for familiarization, without demanding to sign it.


There were also unusual (added, in comparison with the previous forms, which used to sign in the previous years) lines that, in case of complications, I will not have any claims and will not appeal to the court. It happened for the first time since 1994, too. Never before Dr. Tenzer demanded from me to sign such a document.


It suggested to me an idea that he received a call from Dr. Solomon (Benjamin) Saleh (see above), who (maybe) contacted him to incite Dr. Tenzer against me, and both the assistant's behavior, and all the rest of this appointments unusual things - were connected with it.


But, if it was really Dr. Saleh, but not someone from an enforced agency, then, in that case, they had to know (in the clinic of Dr. Saleh) initially - who I am, and to carry out all the orders, lowered to Dr. Saleh "from above", and, for this reason, having bounced me, with my very complex problem, to a less experienced doctor, who should not have been charged with such a tangled procedure, and this whole story with the "overlapping" coinciding operation of two patients (though such practice IN ITSELF is vicious, but is not surprising at all), too, could be not a chain of accidents at all.


But, considering the unusual behavior of Dr. Tenzer's assistants on this day, and all other unusual facts, through a prism of yesterday's spam undoubtedly connected with the company of persecution and intimidation, and all other tricks used against me, all these unusual things cease to seem such inexplicable.


Something unusual was also that - after the removal of 2 teeth - I was not given in hands any printing post-operational instructions, and nothing was told orally (when I can start to eat; whether to put ice; what to use for rinsing the mouth; what is contraindicated, etc.).


Dr. Tenzer did not even prescribe any anti-inflammatory that was usually appointed by him after a removal of even of one tooth; especially - 2 teeth.


Nothing was prescribed for me, and also was not given in the hands in the office, and even not recommended for rinsing of a mouth.


My financial affairs were at that time so deplorable that I could buy nothing in a pharmacy without a prescription.


It is not surprising that the infection developed on the gum after the removal of 2 teeth.


It extended from the cutter to the next molar, and up to the palate...


Besides, in the gum - there was a tiny fragment, which disturbed me then nearly a month.


When, later, I came to Dr. Tenzer 3 times concerning this fragment, he showed patience and was still attentive; he ordered to do the X-ray, felt the gum, tried to find out what's the matter.


But his same Italian assistant tore and threw, and - with irritation - said to me that there "is nothing".


Dr. Tenzer even sent me to another assistant.


On November 22, 2016, this firm splinter in the area of the extracted tooth (this piece sat absolutely superficially) on the left side was taken out by Dr. Tenzer.


Once again he - one of the few doctors - believed me, trusted in my judgement, treated with trust my assessment of the problem and its nature, and it appeared that I was right (once again).


Unlike other doctors, he did not refuse me an ability to assess objectively the situation coming to objective conclusions of rather possible diagnosis.


If there was someone else on the place of Dr. Tenzer, one from those "quack doctors" (whose actions are described in this chronicle), for whom the most "suitable" work - is working in a prison and in concentration camps of the tyrannical regimes - they would dump everything on "hypochondria", and would inflict a lot more suffering and would provoke a lot more complications.


But, when - literally several hours prior to a dental operation - someone sends you such an electronic message (and a number of similar to it):


Date: 17 Nov 2016 20:12:48 +0800 [17/11/16 7:12:48 EST]

From: phqlfi

To: leog@total.net

Subject: Dental operating table

Part(s):

2.1?? 2.png 35 KB

Download All Attachments (in .zip file) Download All Attachments (in .zip

file)

1 unnamed 11 KB

Dear Sir or Madam, We supply baby incubator, surgical light and

Dental chair with competitive pric .Best profit will be good for your

market.If you have interested, pls call us. --


- anything can happen...


November 19, 2016, Saturday.

There were new doubts in the plan of the urological surgery and in its procedure.


Now the situation developed as such: 2 following operations (after the removal of bladder stones), or 1 "extended" (both surgical procedures rolled into one single (i.e. for one operation), but I did not want to do these operations without a preliminary ultrasound.


In August, I passed an abdominal-pelvic ultrasound, but there is no doubt that the electronic data of this exam either inadequate, or partially missing, and the report was based on the previous ultrasound procedures, which took place before the formation of uric stones and cysts (therefore, if to compare its report to the results from the private laboratories (radiologes) - there is the lack of many details).


The same was in February, 2016, when the ultrasound from Hopital General de Montreal (or, in English, Montreal General Hospital) did not find any abnormalities, but a month later the tomography and 3 ultrasounds from private laboratories (done thanks to the financial aid from abroad and the contribution of other people (in Canada) - showed bladder stones and other pathologies.


Meanwhile, bladder pains appeared and all the time increases during its depletion, and (that is even more terrible) even between.


I told few doctors about it.


None the less, no matter how many times I tried to obtain a requisition on a new ultrasound scan from different doctors: useless. Same refusals.


Besides the ultrasound, an additional key for understanding of the mechanism of my problems represented the cystoscopy, which Dr. Morris performed on March 29, 2016.


As I already mentioned, the medical archive of St.-Mary's Hospital and Dr. Morris allowed me to see only the preliminary report, but, till now (almost half a year later!), the medical bureaucracy and the government did not authorize my access to the final report.


Therefore, I composed 2 separate (very short) faxes to Dr. Morris, demanding (in one of them) an access to the final report of the cystoscopy (29 Mar. 2016), and (in the second fax) asking to explain some of the details in the preliminary report, which, in my point of view, could be useful for the approaching urological operation. I sent both faxed to Dr. Morris, with the following header:


To: Dr. Brian Morris - 5025 Sherbrook Ouest,

Suite 455, Westmount, Quebec, H4A 1S9

Tel.: (514) 485-1333 Fax.: (514) 485-8509

[from Lev (Leon) Gunin, (phone, fax) November, 10, 2016]

URGENT


I did not receive any answer, and then left 2 messages on his answering machine - with the same contents. (Taking into consideration my comment that this information is VERY important for the future surgical procedure, Dr. Morris's silence represented some more serious violations than just the violation of medical ethics).


He ignored my messages as well...


All these events are taking place against the background of the fact that - because of the provocations of the telephone company and Internet service provider, and, besides, because of high cost of their services - it was necessary to change the Internet and the telephone company.


Everything worked (again with interruptions) only several days, and then both phone, and Internet began to be switched-off.


So about 3 weeks passed without Internet and phone, so far, and, in response to our complaints, we received a call from the Telephone-Internet company, and they claimed that the problem is in the modem and that they will send a new one.


This modem arrived on Wednesday, November 16, 2016, after the lunch, but we did not connect the new modem and did not plug it in, and, still, starting from the second half of the day, everything suddenly started to work perfectly, and since then - already nearly 5 days - working trouble-free.


In other words, some people arranged a sabotage of Phone-Internet operation, and dated their sabotage for the arrival of a new modem to disguise the original reason of the malfunctions.


Why it was necessary for someone that we should connect the new modem and what can - theoretically - be in this - new - modem: you should not even guess.


Only one and a half weeks passed since the apogee of the scandal with the prosecutions of several famous journalists in Montreal by police, and interception of their phone talks, and already any newspaper does not mention about this affair, which caused the worldwide resonance (even Assange and Snowden commented on it).


Having read materials on persecutions of the famous Montreal journalists, I recalled the whole 11-years saga of police intimidation, used by the authorities against me...


November 21, 2016, Monday.

By 13:00, I arrived to my family doctor.


As I previsioned, he refused to prescribe Erythromycin concerning the dental infection, but this was from his party quite lawful, because - under the protocol - he is obliged to direct a patient with such problems to a dentist.


My family doctor was an only doctor, who appointed for me another abdominal-pelvic ultrasound. He also allowed me to copy the printout of the result of my last laboratory analyses.


As I also assumed ("predicted" in advance) in the record for November 16, 2016, the laboratory of St. Mary's Hospital sabotaged the test for microbiology culture again. I wrote in my diary from November 16, 2016: " On the same day, I passed tests in the laboratory of St. Mary's Hospital. I had neither forces, nor will to go to other hospital - though there is no trust left in the adequacy of MY analyses' results in THIS hospital. I just went there - because it was the closest laboratory from the bureau of my family doctor, and it was not necessary to go anywhere any more...".


So it happened indeed.


Once again, the microbiological culture test was sabotaged, under the pretext of "mukus".


The test's report (16 Nov. 2016) does not even contain the section (microbiology culture), which is simply absent from the report.


The whole analysis of urine represents only one-single page (see below; it is marked "page 1 of 1"). Thus, the paragraph of microbiology culture was not included in this report at all.


It (considering the SYSTEMATIC unwillingness of this laboratory to do this test for microbiology culture) is nothing else but only the change of the tactics of sabotage (see below):


Analysis from November 16, 2016.


Now - few comments on those indicators, which are not "missing":


1) Density - specific weight (density-gravity) - 0.003 (below the norm, and lower than ever before, that usually indicates kidneys problem).


2) Detected hematuria: again (see: blood).


3) ph indicator = 9: (more alkalinity than ever before: this indicates a very high risk of the formation of carbonate and phosphate of calcium, and magnesia phosphate (it means: a very high risk of calcification - from kidneys, bladder, and gall bladder uric stones, to calcifying tendinitis and arthritis (gout). This indicator grows higher, when the ways of bile outflow are hammered (obstructed). (Phosphatase: the enzyme catalyzing the hydrolysis of complex esters of phosphoric acid).


4) Mucus: present. (This indicates the abnormal function of the bile and urinal tract ways, and dysfunction of the cleanup).


The microbiology culture is absent again, as well as in all 5 previous laboratory tests.


As for the blood test from the same bl.-ur. test from 16 Nov. 2016: it disappeared ENTIRELY. It was missing from my file at my family doctor's office, from the medical archive of St. Mary's Hospital, and from the medical file of Sante Quebec.


November 22, 2016, Tuesday.

On November 22, 2016, I was in the dentist's office again, already at 8:30, where Dr. Tenzer removed a fragment, which remained in the gum after 2 tooth's extraction.


Dr. Tenzer appointed Erythromycin.


However, even after that prescription the infection was not defeated, but became even more acute and aggressive, and, besides, I groped another tiny piece of a bony fragment now (or consolidation?) in another area of the gum: on the very tip of the hanging from the outer side of the strip of gum's soft tissue, which - before teeth removal - situated approximately between 2 molars (as the birdie sign in the questionnaires). This piece was left after the dental operation, performed by Dr. Dao.


November 24, 2016, Thursday.

On November 24, 2016, at 9:00, I arrived to Dr. Tenzer's office again, and - at first - was examined by his other assistant (NOT that that suddenly changed her attitude towards me).


She told that she feels one more firm fragment in the gum, but she's not sure of it.


Dr. Tenzer cleaned all bones in the gums, sewed up the gum, and (running forward) - all complications from the removal of 2 teeth were stopped immediately, including the infection.


Only Dr. Tenzer's intervention stopped the remaining complications left by medical errors of Dr. Dao, who did not want to repair the damage, which he left. It means that Dr. Tenzer did the job, which Dr. Dao was obliged to do after his damaging actions.


Once again, Dr. Tenzer acted adequately and did everything correctly, without ignoring my complaints and assumptions - as some other doctors of dental and of different profiles did.


Even now, when - as though - all problems have been resolved, he - after all - appointed another - additional - rendezvous for November 30, 2016: to see if everything is OK now, and if the infection is gone, but did not begin to declare - as Dr. Dao said - that supposedly "cannot receive patients "every minute".


November 24, 2016, Thursday.

On November 24, 2016, I came Dr. Tenzer (the dentist) again by 9:00.


It was - at this time - much more difficult to explain what's the matter, but doctor's assistant, a new paramedic (not nurse), told that she feels one tinier splinter (or consolidation), and knows - where it is.


The doctor, however, said that he doubts that it is a splinter, but that will remove it if there is something, and added that it is necessary to level and polish the gum bones and to sew up again, then the wound will be healed, and everything "bad" will pass...


I was against it - since wanted to visit another dentist, looking for an alternative opinion. Such a long and tormenting complication made me broken and disoriented, against the background of other health problems.


Dr. Tenzer told "well, then we will just remove this piece of the gum", but himself, instead, began to perform those procedures, about which reported at first. With the dental tools in the gum - I could not stop the operation any more.


But - before they began to sew up the wound - I asked again whether the tiny fragment is removed, and whether the tip of the soft tissue, which is hanging from the outer side, is cut off.


The doctor asked whether I feel any splinter now, but - this time - the dose of Novocain was increased, and my tongue lost its sensitivity, moreover - both tampons and all the rest - became an obstacle, so I could feel nothing, and told about it, again very accurately having defined the location of a fragment: on the very end of the strip of a longer soft tissue, which went from the edge of the outside gum like a checkmark.


So I could not understand if this piece of a fragment is left, or was removed... But it immediately became better ...


When, from Dr. Tenzer, I went home by Metro, 2 police officers, one white, and one black, intercepted my way at the last transfer station Lionel Groux, and the white policeman approached me, passing by me, and intentionally shouldered me. It could not be accidental.


Then, when I left - going up the escalator - at my station, the last (second) escalator was faced by 2 other police officers, who stopped me, ordered to get out my Metro smart card - and scanned it with a special device.


If someone says that I was stopped "accidentally", I will answer that - if not a feint of 2 police officers at the transfer station Lionel-Groux - and if I resolutely would not resemble someone who is capable to jump over the levers of automates - and to go without ticket: I would believe in an accidental interception.


November 25, 2016, Friday.

It is clear, that I addressed Dr. Tenzer concerning the removal of 2 next teeth (since there is no money for the treatment) - but not in a specialized clinic, because exactly there they ruined the whole gum and did a heap of complications (see the "report" about the previous events).


But - again - I came across the next nightmare.


However, unlike the specialized clinic, Dr. Tenzer coped with the teeth removal complications incomparably better, not to mention that he showed incommensurably greater compassion and humanity.


Fantastically bad luck, or something else?


There is no wish to think of it...


As for complications and difficulty of teeth extraction: it is, perhaps, connected with the fact that I have unusually strong and very strongly sitting teeth, which could serve me "up to 100 years old age" if I had money for their treatment and prevention, and then it would not be necessary to pull them out.


It is necessary to emphasize as well the following: both Dr. Tenzer, and my family doctor (therapist) - receive me at any time when I came, without an appointment. (I mean: last 2 or 1 and a half years).


It in Canada, and, especially, in Quebec, is possible only for "2 and a half" patients.


Ordinary Quebecers wait for a visit to a doctor for months. And I as though live in another reality - and - moreover - complain...


In the field of medicine (in the health care domain), a complete disaster was outlined in the last 2 years.


The federal Canadian minister called this situation a national disaster. Newspapers were toppled by a message that one female resident of Quebec waited for a visit to a gynecologist... 5 years!


Actually, no good treatment of several knowing doctors (excellent experts and lovely people) can compensate the pressure on them of "higher bodies" and medical institutions, sabotage of my analyses and exams, and deliberate damage to my health by other doctors and medical personnel.


In several languages there is such saying as "in muddy water..."


... The present tragic situation in the Canadian health care - is a good cover for all, who wish to use medicine for political goals, for prosecution of dissidents, for turning the health care into a bullet, muttering under their breath: not to heal, but to kill...


The infection still did not pass completely. 3 times the dentist put the medicine in a post-operational cavity. It helps very much.


November 28, 2016, Monday.

It turns out that ALL last laboratory tests' reports are missing the microbiology culture section: this time, not only involving St. Mary's Hospital, but other Montreal hospitals as well, which destroyed the microbiology culture part and made the results of the analyses sabotaged.


In some cases, the microbiology culture part is just missing; in other cases, the microbiology culture is removed from the report due to alleged vitamin C intake (which is a lie, because I am not taking vitamin C); in other tests' reports it was indicated that, allegedly, the "low count" (low microorganism's concentration, low volume of sample, or laboratory's error) is justifying the lack of microbiology culture; in other cases, a microorganism was not detected, because, allegedly, due to the lack of abnormal count of nitrates, proteins; etc. Totally, I counted 11 types of pretexts for not displaying the microbiology culture part in my lab tests, not speaking about the innumerous examples of microbiology culture part vanishing without any explanation, justification, or pretext. However, because of the SYSTEMATIC character of microbiology culture section removal in ALL my lab tests, all the excuses and pretexts of its sabotage is nothing else but an obvious fraud. The obviousness of this is confirmed by the fact that none of the tests, done outside of Montreal, or on requisition of non-Montreal doctors, was missing the microbiology culture part.


This tendency was confirmed again in the end of November, 2016: a test, which I passed in a laboratory outside of Montreal, contains the microbiology culture part, which did not disappear. It seems, there is no infection... But this did not amuse me, because - if the chronic bladder pain against the background of the absence of an infection continues - there is nothing cheerful here... At best (I hope) the pain is related to spasms or a result of the partial obstruction.


Meanwhile, the depression passes into the background, or amplifies to a former intolerableness.


What will happen after the approaching 2-nd (and 3-rd, if needed) urologic operation: it is not known and unpredictable.


November 28, 2016, Monday.

On November 28, 2016, I arrived by 11:00 to Lakeshore Hospital for passing the preoperative tests and analyses.


There I met a very human and sympathizing treatment practically from all employees of this hospital.


November 30, 2016, Wednesday.

On November 30, 2016, I arrived by 9:00 to Dr. Tenzer's office again.


The gum, which is still swelled up, is painful and infected again. (I did not begin a new course of Erythromycin yet).


The doctor put a medicine in the gum again.


CHAPTER 12. December 2016.


DECEMBER, 2016.


December 1, 2016, Thursday.

The rendezvous with Dr. Anna Khanonyan (planned at 10:45) - was cancelled.


December 13, 2016, Tuesday.

I managed to achieve, finally, a rendezvous with Dr. Morris on Tuesday, December 13, 2016, at 16:15.


But I managed to attain an audience with Dr. Morris only after my warning that if he still refuses to provide the final cystoscopy's report and refuses to comment on cystoscopy's findings, I should reserve an option to address to him through a lawyer. I forced him to comment on one of lines in the official report of a cystoscopy of March 29, 2016: "obstructing from veru" [(from the seed hillock)].


He told that I already knew myself (without adding anything new): i.e. that it means the uterus swelling "from veru", with the narrowing of the passage for evacuation of bladder's contents, and that "a surgical procedure is needed".


And this told the doctor, who - all these years - denied the blockage of the passage; denied or (already in 2016) downplayed BP enlargement (what I dinned into his ears, demanding a remedy (2 alpha blockers, 1 stimulating the outflow, and the 2-nd reducing the enlargement); and, when once I brought him a number of ultrasounds' copies, with the diagnoses of significant "uterus enlargement", he got irritated, even infuriated, began to shout that ultrasonography "cannot determine even an approximate size", and so furiously crossed out digits-indicators in the copies of medical documents that tore the paper.


Instead of appreciation for the fact that I did not begin to file official complaints concerning his unethical acts and actions, which seriously harmed my health, and inflicted dramatic suffering, he attacked me again, saying that, because, I supposedly cancelled the operation (appointed to May 16, 2016), he was forced to pay a fine of 500 dollars (I do not trust it), and operation cancellation supposedly cost the state public health system 10 thousand dollars. (According to all my consultants and advisers, it is a blatant lie).


This time, his statement about his own losses sounded much more modestly (last time - when he vomited the same charges - he called much larger sums with 3 zeros).


Already only for this reason (not just because - in the past - he lied innumerous times), it is impossible to trust him.


Besides, not I, but he cancelled the operation, and, it turns out, punished himself financially. To accuse me of cancellation of an operation, which HE technically cancelled: it is a top of hypocrisy and cynicism.


In June, I talked to one doctor-surgeon, retelling him the accusation that Dr. Morris stated, and this doctor said that the cancellation of an operation did not cause any damage. He also said that Dr. Morris, accusing me of "provoking" financial losses, and having illegally thrown me out from the list of his patients, committed a criminal offence. There such enormous waiting lists for any surgical operation in Quebec that the operating rooms are never empty, and the hospital immediately puts another patient for same time in case of cancellation.


Besides, I did not begin to discuss a possibility of rescheduling or cancellation of the operation in the last moment (and, I repeat, I did not cancel it), but started such negotiations in advance, on legal grounds, without having violated any conditions for such cancellation (provided by rules).


It is worth to add that I argued that the operation by Dr. Morris is not safe for me, because this doctor hates me and already did a lot of damage to my health; that I have some conditions for the operation, including my demands to address the health issues risky or contraindicated to a serious surgery; and that I demand to disclose particular medical information, which the hospital is concealing from me: as a precondition of my final consent for the surgery.


The hospital (St. Mary's Hospital) did not replace Dr. Morris by another surgeon; did not address my health issues potentially dangerous for a surgery; and did not open an access for me to 29 Mar. 2016 cystoscopy, preoperative laboratory tests and cardiogram, etc.


Instead, Dr. Morris and St. Mary's Hospital: they just cancelled the operation, without obtaining my consent for this cancellation and without summoning me to sign any legal paper.


And now, instead of an apology, Dr. Morris cynically attacked me again.


But this was not the first time, when Dr. Morris attacks me for, allegedly, "malicious abuse of the governmental resources", and, allegedly, for causing a material damage to the state and to him personally.


In 2013-2015, he spitefully attacked me for, allegedly, "too frequent" laboratory tests: like, allegedly, each analysis costs the public health system 500-1000 dollars or more.


It is easy to notice that he uses always the same some lump sums (500, 1000, 10000), and it speaks for itself.


But - this time - he even threatened me.


He told that - because of me - the government, allegedly, lost large sums of money, having again added (as he claimed already once) that - because of my "statements" (it seems to me that last time he used the words like "literary trash") - whether he, whether his family lost thousands of dollars, and continued: "And who paid for it? Did you pay? No? "Someone" paid".


His tone and his hint assumed that I will pay dearly for it. (This sounded in the form of an undisguised threat).


Perhaps, Dr. Morris has thrown by then one more phrase: "But the one who does not pay will pay dearly for it as a result". This phrase is given in my initial records with the question mark, and, so, whether I was not sure that I correctly caught (or correctly understood) what was said finally by Dr. Morris, whether I was not sure that my memory, which surely reproduced other details of this dialogue, not so surely lit this - last - phrase...


But - if such a phrase was really told by Dr. Morris: it is a much more serious threat...


First, it is literally a tracing-paper from the shouts of the immigration officers "from medicine" (Immigration Medical Services' doctors), including the doctor, who caught me on Montreal Chest Institute's internal stairs and attacked me nearly with fists, bringing financial charges against me in the style "a la Dr. Morris", and reducing the whole drama with the counterfeit "tubercular" diagnosis (and attempts - on the basis of this forgery - to put me "on treatment" to the infectious diseases unit and topple our immigration procedure): to a pure "financial" claim (as false as the falsified diagnosis "tuberculosis").


That moral freak - as well as Dr. Morris - reduced everything to a monetary question as if I tried to escape in every way from the infectious diseases unit not because was afraid for my life and did not wish an unnecessary course of " tuberculosis treatment", and did not wish to submit myself to the decision of criminal gang of immigration doctors, but because, allegedly, I just evaded from a monetary contribution to the Canadian state, which sheltered me.


The counterfeited fluorography was announced later "lost" ("missing"), and the fat dots were put on it...


(See one of the previous books of this series: Health Care as a Repressive Tool; Book 1; Chapter 4).


Now, we will return to Dr. Morris.


As I already noticed, first, his words were a tracing-paper of the words of the officials of such an oppressive (enforcement) agency as Federal Immigration Canada, and, secondly, on my memory - ANY other doctor (except the doctor from the Montreal Chest Institute (MCI) never referred to monetary questions.


Thirdly, threatening me that I will "pay" for his personal financial losses "dearly" (allegedly, because of "cancelled" "by me" [though he cancelled it] operations) [he also mentioned that my "statements" somehow provoked alleged financial losses of his family and the financial losses of the Canadian state], he perfectly knew that I am on welfare and that no finances could not be taken from me. Not otherwise, he meant that I will pay off with my health or even with my life.


So, my fear and depression caused by it, and even my actions, which terminated in cancellation by Dr. Morris of 16 May 2016 operation - were not "irrational"....


Each mere mortal (not a doctor and not a high-ranking official understanding in such affairs) would be afraid to be operated at such person...


Whether it is accidental that - in the next days - literally since December 14, 2016, the intensified police surveillance has activated again, and there were new events, which are keeping within the event of a number of the previous sequences of political repressions?


On Sunday, December 18, 2016, I wrote down in the chronicle of events that "on Thursday, December 15 (2016), I went on another medical procedure".


On my way, there was a police car 18-8 in the key point.


"We went around, on one road that goes kind of an arch on boondocks".


"And just on departure from this road to a very secondary road (known to just few people) the police also waited for us".


It was talked of a trip to the abdominal-pelvic ultrasound in the Lasalle Hospital, where I was taken by car, by my wife.


When we came home, all wires from the modem and the digital phone were switched and connected not to the right inputs and outputs.


Whether accidentally it occurred right after my visit to Dr. Morris? Or - when (another time) I returned from another hospital (I was absent 2 hours) - the external hard drive (which I switched-off and hid before leaving): was hot. It means that it was found - and connected, and someone was studying the information.


Meanwhile, the Lakeshore Hospital, which appointed the date of the 2-nd (following) urologic operation, cancelled it, and postponed the operation for the whole month.


This is a real disaster - both psychologically, and in general.


I hope that it is not connected to my visit to Dr. Morris, and to someone's desire to be better prepared for a possible sabotage and diversion.


As for my public piano concerts - there is neither will, nor forces, nor time, nor desire (in the connection with the full "shift" of my inner world's environment) for them - as provocations, problems, and all other events, which are beating my out from a saddle, go in flocks.


There is no single day without new health problems.


But even this is not the main obstacle, because the depression and the different vision of the world - formed under its influence - made impossible any advanced creative activity in those some spheres, in which I was active before.


There are especially many problems in the last days - from dermatological to gastroenterological, and from cardiovascular - to urological.


December 15, 2016, Thursday.

On Thursday, December 15, 2016, I underwent the abdominal-pelvic ultrasound in Lasal Hospital, on requisition of my family doctor (one more of the uncountable favors rendered to me by this wonderful doctor and decent, honest person).


The conclusion of this ultrasound is differed from ALL OTHER ultrasounds, done in other private and public hospitals' ultrasound departments, because this scan could "see" what other US scans "did not notice in an emphasis" markedly.


The further enlargement of the cyst in the left kidney, and - possibly - formation of one more, still very tiny, cyst; a stone of 2 mm in the same kidney.


Besides, this ultrasound has found a significant uterus calcification on the right, on the middle line, which, in principle, corresponds to the conclusion of Dr. Morris's cystiscopy's report, where it was written about the obstruction "from "veru".


And, at last, the volume of the residual liquid in the bladder indicates a bad outflow (that - once again - disproves doctor Morris's lie about a "good stream").


Thus, Dr. PHARAND and Dr. MORRIS, and other doctors (about whose actions was told in this chronicle) damaged my kidneys, did the mass of other troubles, inflicted incalculable suffering, and provoked serious urological (and others serious) complications as a result of 2 unnecessary cystoscopies, which were performed by them under the refusal of preventive antibiotic treatment before this procedure, and refused any medical help when the drama of life-threatening complications burst.


Doctor Morris also refused laboratory analyses during recurrences of the acute UT infections, refused to prescribe essential medications (and, in particular, Flomax), antibiotic therapy in connection with UTI-s, and - all this - provoked an aggressive lithiasis and other complications.


December 19, 2016, Monday.

At 11:30 in the morning, December 19, 2016, I left a message on Dr. El-Hakim's answering machine (non-Montreal urologist):


1. The surgery date was rescheduled - first - from Jan. 5 to Jan. 26 (2017), and now to 22 of Dec.

2. An ultrasound was done at LaSalle Hosp. 4 days ago, Dec. 15 (2016). They said: if the rapport is not ready yet - call the hospital about the verbal comments (...). Do we need just the uterus outlet widening, or also the so-called "uterus shaving"?

3. Needed an urgent doctor's opinion about a preventive course of Cipro, because of an enterococci infection after any intrusive procedure.

4. Due to severe constipation problem, post-operative strategy may be needed in advance.

5. In last week, my blood pressure used to jump same days from 145 x 90 to 75 x 40, with the episodes of slight vertigo. I must report this before the surgery.

6. I was told by the hospital reprehensive to bring a yellow paper that the doctor gave me, but I did not find it.


I received an immediate reply to my message, and the doctor invited me to a rendezvous on December 21, 2016.


December 21, 2016, Wednesday.

On Wednesday, December 21, 2016, I arrived by 9:30 to the office of Dr. El-Hakim (non-Montreal urologist).


All details of the operation were discussed again; risk factors are emphasized again; my approval of actions of the doctor and gratitude for everything that he did for me: were stated for my part.


December 22, 2016, Thursday.

In the second half of December, absolutely unexpectedly, the operation - appointed to January 5, 2017 - was suddenly rescheduled for January 26, 2017, though there was a remark "an urgent operation" in the requisition.


It is natural that I tried to obtain an answer to a question: why?


A doctor, who called me (or a nurse?) said that she is not aware of the reason.


Then I asked her to connect me to her supervisors.


A chef doctor of the "operation unit" personally spoke to me.


This alone testifies that not the Lakeshore Hospital, but the oppressive governmental structures were behind the date's change.


The logic is very simple.


If the operation unit's chef doctor decided to speak with me himself, this indicates his great concern about the situation, and, consequently, points at this situation as to a very severe violation of medical standards and protocols, and the code of the urgent operations. And, obviously, it gave out his natural fear of repercussion and consequences. Unlike St. Mary's Hospital's operation units' doctors and nurses, who spoke to me utmost boldly, insolently, and rudely (in exception of Dr. Segal, a very polite and ethical man in his attitude towards me), because they knew that I am a persecuted dissident, and have no social, financial, and legal protection, Lakeshore Hospital's chef doctor spoke to me very politely, and, I guess, not only because he is a lucid morally person, but because he is ill-informed about the hidden motives (ins and outs) of this affair.


And this leads to a conclusion that the operation was "permanently" postponed and pushed for further and further dates at the level incomparably higher than the level of Lakeshore's operation unit's chef doctor, or even this hospital's general chef doctor.


As I expected, he told that he is not aware who and why rescheduled the date of operation.


I asked him to write down my questions, and told him that I absolutely want to know WHY the operation was cancelled and rescheduled.


Later, I called Lakeshore Hospital 2 more times, and also spoke with Dr. El-Hakim (the non-Montreal urologist), who was absolutely confused, and, it seems, could not understand how it could occur.


Perhaps, his secretary called the hospital, and talked to someone about this awkward situation, because she contacted me, and asked if I am ready for the operation in December, 2016, and told that will report about it in a day - two.


After her call, I received a call from the hospital again, and was told that the operation will not take place on January 26, 2017 - as well, and can be postponed for an indefinite time.


Then I sent a message to Dr. El-Hakim's secretary, having let her know about the last development.


I also sent a fax to Lakeshore Hospital, with a request to explain the reason of the 2-nd (actually - the 3-rd) postponement of the date of operation.


On December 19, 2016, I was suddenly called from the Lakeshore Hospital, and reported that the operation can be appointed to any of the next few days, i.e. they presented me with a fait accompli. It was something "déjà vu".


My friends and their friends told me that this is not a very good idea - to have a surgery on the Catholic Christmas, when most of the doctors and best nurses are absent, and when the operation itself can be completed by not the most professional assistants. One of my friends even told me that the "permanent" postponement of the operation was one of the provocation, while an "alternative" provocation is to force me to agree for a surgery on the Christmas days.


So, I could wait for a new - very uncertain - future date, or to "finish" the next "crossing" (as spoke my late mother) as quicker as possible.


But even this consideration did not - mainly - influenced my decision, but the fact that the operation can be delayed further then further infinitely, - and this will be more dangerous for both medical, and non-medical reasons.


Understanding that this hospital - in one of Montreal satellites town - is not to blame, but that all this clownery is generated at the level of Sante Quebec, the Ministry of Health, or at other administrative channels, I trusted in good will this hospital' employees, and they justified my confidence: they found for me a niche on December 22, 2016, before the most Catholic Christmas.


The risk was considerable, because - during this period - the blood pressure fell to 70 х 50, the platelets were below the norm, and there were other problems that could lead to very big troubles.


The risk increased also because I had to stay in hospital (after the operation) during holidays, but I has no choice.


I had to agree though not all the personnel work on holidays; there are practically no doctors; and, if something happens: there could be big problems. But I ran also these risks, understanding that if not now, then "later" can never happen.


At my request, the urologist-surgeon appointed (without problems) a preventive course of antibiotics and also intravenous injection directly during operation. (What striking difference from everything that was done by Dr. Morris!).


I will repeat that the risk was significant.


I knew that the chronic bleedings and chronic infections of the uterus, abscesses (from time to time), constipations, and other problems can seriously complicate the healing and recovery, and even to nullify all results of operation (if not to lead to a deadly threat).


In 2 weeks prior to operation there was one more unpleasant turn.


Suddenly, the blood pressure began to jump with a bigger amplitude: it happened, it elevated to 145х90, and - just in a couple of hours - fell to 70х40. With such a lowered blood pressure it is already necessary to call 9-11. But I somehow coped with it, using the make-shifts, quickly lifting the pressure to an acceptable level.


At the same time, began quite severe dizziness (with low pressure - not surprisingly, but it was repeating even when the pressure sometimes returned to normal). I never had dizziness till June 21, 2016 (with an exception of vertigo on November 3, 2005 and January 7, 2013).


It seemed that my messages for the anesthesiologist (about the pressure jumps, and, the main thing, about the episodes of very low pressure - on Tuesday and Wednesday (December 20 and 21, 2016), sent to hospital, and my message to doctor's secretary: did not reach the destination. It is good that - in the operating room - I did not forget to warn the personnel about these pressure jumps, and the nurse registering the life functions indicators treated it seriously and responsibly. She immediately ran to pick up the device for blood pressure measurement, registered all indicators, and wrote down something into my file.


The anesthesiologist also took my warning seriously, several times (instead of one) measured my blood pressure, and the lower indicator fell to the mark of "50". Then he cancelled the planned general anesthesia, and I was given, as well as before the litholopaxy operation, an injection in the vertebrae, and intravenously (together with antibiotic) - morphine. (Once again my medical knowledge saved me from even bigger troubles, and, maybe, saved my life.)


When the anesthesia began to disappear, I suddenly "forgot" all languages, except German, and said the first phrases after the operation only in Goethe's language. Again, something serious happened at the level of the cardio-vascular (or cerebral) problems. This phenomenon reminded that my basic mnemico-verbal operating system: it is German - the language of my childhood (Yiddish and the Austrian German). And, it is possible, the fact that I began reading in German not much and - for years - did not communicate in this language any more, could undermine the integrity of my inner world. (Running forward: when - in half a year - I had an opportunity to communicate to Austrian Germans, they told me that my German is still rather good; I could communicate very fluently and without big effort with them).


Already even more surprising things began to happen in the hospital ward. My English became suddenly worse than French, and all the time spent in hospital I communicated with the personnel and with all others almost exclusively in French. It was very surprising, because I knew English since the childhood, and, since 16 y.o. spoke English fluently, while French I started to learn myself (never having any course or teachers) when I was 40 y.o. After the operation, more than a month Quebec French remained my main language of communication, instead of English, Russian, and Polish. Then suddenly I began to forget some French words and values, idioms and phrases, and my French suddenly "deteriorated".


Instead of the planned day (at most 2-3 days): I spent nearly 6 days on hospital's bed with a catheter! And, at the same time, the content of the suspended bag almost up to the end of this term stayed dark red, with large and plentiful blood clots (that was the most terrible and dangerous).


Only in the last one and a half days the thrombosis diminished a little - and slightly turned pink, - and a very young Polish-speaking nurse (with whom I, certainly, communicated in Polish) not really wanted to sign an official report to exit discharge (from the hospital), but I risked, insisted on departure, and was, after all, allowed to go home (I will notice that - in Canada - nobody will keep you even 5 extra minutes in hospital, trying literally in several hours, at most - in a day or two after ANY operation - to throw you out home; so, my long stay on the hospital bed speaks for itself).


There was one more unpleasant event: the nurse (a good person and a diligent medic, but - it is obvious - without wide experience) ineptly pulled out the catheter, and, perhaps, injured the canal. (Or the injury was done when the surgeon's assistant inserted a catheter; then the nurse is not guilty).


Here it is necessary to add another sad fact.


In the Canadian hospitals, the diameter of catheter's tube - for the operations connected with the need of irrigation of the uric stones remains or with the evacuation of blood from the uric pathways - is standard, whereas the anatomic parameters of the canal in different people are very dissimilar. And this practice already obviously predisposes to barbaric injuries. I do not know if this is true, but I heard that, allegedly, in Europe and Russia 3 types of similar tubes of different diameter are applied: depending on the specific anatomic features of a patient.


During my stay in the hospital, there were absolutely frightening moments: I could not empty stomach-intestines more than 3 days, and, after such an operation it is more than just dangerous. I tried everything that only exist in the arsenal of the laxatives. The situation has reached the point that an option of an enema or phosphate-soda method were considered though after such an operation these methods are very undesirable, and can lead to anything.


An additional frightening moment: after any similar operation, there are always fears whether the uterus (the "faucet") "will be started" after the removal of catheter.


It is necessary to tell a couple of words about the Lakeshore Hospital in Point-Claire - the suburban town. It was like I got to another world, on another planet. To tell only that the treatment there was more human than in Montreal hospitals - is to tell nothing. Everything was different there. And the most surprising that people, who did not know me being not aware who I am, treated me with sympathy and compassion, with great respect and even with love. I will never forget how much my mother suffered in different hospitals in Montreal, when it was impossible to knock until one is heard to get nurse's attention. At night - from 22:00 to 6:00 - practically any medic's leg did not step in the hospital's wards. And - the fact that in this rather small (by the criteria of enormous multicase hospitals of Montreal) Lakeshore Hospital the nurses did a round each two hours (as in the afternoon), visiting every ward, was just surprising. They also resorted on the first call.


Well, and, of course, they behaved and treated their patients properly, and I saw sincere (but not persons' on duty) smiles on their faces.


It was like I returned on 20 years ago, when the whole situation, the whole atmosphere in Montreal was similar, and the humanity did not evaporate from the interhuman relations yet...


In the same post-operational department, several interesting subjects underwent medical treatment.


I should omit this fragment of my records not only in connection with my unwillingness to distant from purely-medical subjects, but also because in today's Canada it is dangerous for people whom you describe.


Once - in my letters to friends - I praised highly the staff of one medical institution, and - in passing - noticed that some young doctors and trainees have an absolutely low opinion about the Canadian medical system and about the level of the Canadian medical help. Then I accidentally learned that these lovely people - through one - got to a strip of troubles.


It appears, that - at all my "realistic" view of things, - I was still absolutely naive concerning the present proto-totalitarian Canadian regime, where the perlustration of personal correspondence became a common practice (as in the former USSR), and where the whole society is flooded with an entire army of informers (as well as in the present Germany), and where (for your slightest critical statement) - it is possible to lose easily your work and to get under police and gendarmerie surveillance. Here is which "freedom" reigns in Canada today.


But the most dangerous (as well as in Germany): it is to state even a slightest criticism of the Israeli regime, "the Jewish state" in Palestine and its politicians, Jewish religion, or activity of the Jewish organizations and firms, and the Israeli companies in Canada.


Nevertheless, some other subjects are already "catch up" the given above in the table of ranks of the Canadian state censorship, and it is a frightening characteristic development of the global return to tragic 1940-s. Therefore, I will not begin to describe neither the high sincere qualities, nor the responsibility and diligence, nor the devotion and care of patients of practically everyone, who worked those days in the postoperative department of the Lakeshore Hospital, and, certainly, their statements on any given questions. All of them had an exclusively high opinion on my doctor-urologist (El-Hakim), who operated me. Really, judging by my own experience, he has rare qualities as a doctor and a person.


When I asked for Dr. El-Hakim about a referral to a gastroenterologist (not to Dr. Szego, who is not able to perform a surgery if needed; and, in his hospital, I trust only him): he immediately gave it.


A requisition on ultrasonography shortly before the operation: without any arguments. (However, I already obtained such a requisition from my family doctor).


Moreover, his secretary called the hospital, and asked to do the ultrasound urgently.


THIS hospital (the Lakeshore Hospital) did not have such an opportunity, and, then, the Lakeshore Hospital addressed to another hospital, in another suburban town, where the waiting lines had not such huge turns: and arranged an ultrasound for me with the result-report literally for couple of days, having been in time some days before the operation. Such a human approach is just unthinkable in any of Montreal's hospitals.


Fortunately, the kidneys (except the already known small cyst, which did not enlarge in last period of time) and the bladder are unremarkable (it is a good news). This ultrasound and the kindness of the employees of Lakeshore and Lasalle hospitals (which arranged an urgent passing and the procedure and of the quick report of this procedure - bypassing a usual turn) helped by then with the confirmation of the developed plan of the operation. (I already described that - on December 15, 2016 (Thursday), when my wife was driving me for this medical procedure, the police car 18-8 was watching us at the key point; and, when we came home, all wires from the modem and digital phone were switched messy and connected to wrong ports).


Returning to nurses', paramedics', and patients' (my companions in misfortune) sincere and long conversations with me (in the postoperative department of Lakeshore Hospital) - I have such an impression that - where the relations are impartial, and where there are no intrigues of the authorities, and their furious mutts do not bark at me, the sympathetic relation of people is explained by their intuition. They intuitively feel, on which part is my soul - good or evil, - and they do not want to be on hell's side.


It was very sad to lie on hospital' bed in a piteous state during Christmas, when - in the Catholic Quebec - it is a holiday for everyone. Some singing collective visited the postoperative department on Christmas eve (about 12 singers), and they went along the corridors with the Christmas tunes.


When I returned home from the hospital, I stayed alone at home for the New Year Eve. My older daughter's husband' parents and the grandmother, her best friend, my younger daughter with her groom, the best friend of my younger daughter: all of them came to the apartment of my oldest daughter, and, of course, my wife was there, too. All of them tried to convince me to come, too, asking me to go, despite my poor state, by car there, and there they would allocate me in the second half of the apartment with the separate room and bed, toilet and bathroom - but I did not go as it was too risky: where to go with the bleeding and thrombosis, when everything burned and scratched inside?


However, right on the New Year's Eve the destiny took pity, and the blood clots ceased to appear, pain and burning stopped, and the bladder content from orange turned into pink.


And so proceeded till the evening, January 1, 2017. Then, because of the continued constipations, there was an accident again; bleeding with large blood clots renewed, and, what is even more terrible: the outflow sharply worsened, almost as before the operation, and I was already thinking that the whole operation - was to nothing, and all my torments and risks were of no use.


The next several days were a living hell. Sometimes the blood clots completely blocked the canal, and - with an easy click (as a sound of an uncorked bottle) - were shot out, and, then, the outflow used to be partially restored. Without addressing to emergency and calling the Ambulance, I risked very much, and everything could terminate just very sadly.


But - in the hospital - they would resort to a catheter, and, besides, to a biggest catheter (while everything was already injured or even damaged inside), and would cause even a bigger, even an irreversible damage. Nobody would begin to do an exception for me - and to treat me as in private clinics abroad, using spare and different technique.


Fortunately, the most important reason of deterioration of the outflow was, probably, in the blood clots, and the biggest risk consisted in them, too (in the thrombosis, which is not simply dangerous, but is life-threatening). In several days, the outflow restored, but - after this sudden deterioration on January 1, 2017 - almost the whole month - the bleedings, pain and burning inside, and thrombosis (big blood clots): were continuing to torment my body.


On January 11 and 12, 2017, I began to creep out somehow to the street to restore my physical shape.


But it was necessary to returned to the confinement to bed again, because the walks led to the next deterioration.


On January 11, 2017, two persons, whom I suspect of snitching and shadowing, oddly faced me face to face though I went out for a walk after midnight, and they (as most of the people in this conservative Quebec neighborhood) are filled up to sleep very much early. And, on January 12, 2017, I was already openly monitored by police (the patrol car 15-13).


In this month spent in the bed (as soon as I started walking slightly more, sitting, or affording some physical activities: bleeding and formation of blood clots used to increase abruptly to a menacing point), many other sores became aggravated, and now, my general state of health is much worse than even before the operation, and I should get out of this abyss of complications almost with an equal hardship as after the operation of litholopaxy.


Was it worth it: will show the new uroflow test.


Half a year more is necessary to cleared up if typical postoperative complications (typical for this kind of surgeries) will arise, and 5 more years - whether will be a recurrence.


So far, only a problem of slow depletion and frequent urgent urges is solved (in English - "urgency"), and 3 other problems remain so far, though still there is a chance that everything will get better.


But even this small progress already liquidated the threat of frequent infections and minimized the threat of uric stones formation, and this is already a great achievement, if, of course, within the next 6 months the results of the operation do not reverse back, because of constipations, pressure upon uterus, and other factors.


All that I want: it is to return to even such "normal" (far from normal, but...) life that was till March, 2016 (though I suffered from the recurrences of arthritis, gastroenterological, dermatological, cardiovascular, urological, and other problems, but I managed to cope with them in my own alternative way, against the background of sabotage of treatment of my sores by medical institutions). By then, I managed, at least (let it was far from normal, however...), to function somehow in the everyday sense, socially and physically.


This last post-operational record is showing how dramatic and fragile was my situation. Bleeding proceeded (sometimes with blood clots) up to February 5, 2017.


On January 30, 2016, I was on the post-operational check in the Lakeshore Hospital (9:00).


FEBRUARY, 2017.


February 7, 2017, Tuesday.

On Tuesday, February 7, 2017, I was in the office of the non-Montreal urologist (Dr. El-Hakim) (9:50). All problems and all threats for my health, as well as probable measures for my situation's improvement - were discussed.


I noticed - with a touch of worries and sadness - that Dr. El-Hakim is very sick himself. The signs of a very serious sickness could be noticed in him, and, because I am not a bad diagnostician, I became nervous about a very bad outcome for him.


February 15, 2017, Wednesday.

On Wednesday, February 15, 2017 - I visited my family doctor (8:30).


My family doctor; the urologist, Dr. El-Hakim; the dentist, Dr. Tenzer (whom I visit since 1990-s); my permanent gastroenterologist - since 2001, Dr. Szego; the rheumatologist, Dr. Anna Khanonyan; all 4 dermatologists, among whom - Dr. St. Jacques and Dr. St. Pierre; and not less than two dozens of other doctors, whose names I will not disclose for reasons of their safety: there are people, who do their medical work honestly, and helped me to get out of many troubles. If ALL doctors worked at their professional level, and, at the same time, would not break the principles of medical ethics (without speaking about the violations of the criminal code any more): it would be much easier to live on this sin Earth.


The CONCLUSION of 2016-2017 MANUSCRIPT.

Here I must, end this chronicle in spite of the fact that the epic of my fight for life continued in not less dramatic circumstances.


The vision problems and the danger to my eyes at their overfatigue does not allow me to finish the whole story.


I am able to afford only the shortest retelling of some most dramatic situations.


In general, the repressions against me in hospitals and other medical institutions, and medical crimes of doctors - after the surgical operation in December, 2016: sharply declined. But it did not stop separate surges in their recurrence. (As an example: the behavior and actions of Dr. Sejean, who continued to scoff over me even more than before, against the background of the crash of all my attempts to pass from him to another otolaryngologist).


The police intimidation and surveillance - continued, especially during my visits to medical institutions (as before). Unless - without the former demonstrativeness, intensity and aggressive persistence.


I enjoyed only a temporary lull (if it is possible to call "calm" the continuing depression, which, nevertheless, began to decline (having completely disappeared only in July, 2017, and, thus, having lasted the whole year) in February - the beginning of March, 2017, then burst the new disaster, which made my life even more uncomfortable. These are, first, the cardiovascular problems, which were still ignored by doctors. It was absolutely clear that neither the cardiogram, nor heart X-ray can show anything sufficiently (in comparison with the cardiogram (May, 2016) which - for the first time in my life - showed the "Preliminary wave succession", and then this pathology became steady and constant).


Neither the reasons of the "Preliminary wave succession", nor the cause of heartaches, nor the problems with the blood vessels, episodes of tachycardia (especially at the moments of awakening, or during taking the horizontal position or when standing up), and the arrhythmias: were not defined.


Doctors systematically refused a referral to an echocardiogram and so-called "cardio stress test". I saw several doctors, but all of them refused it. And only my family doctor, as always, sent me not only for a repeated cardiogram, but also offered one of possible diagnostic decisions which I, however, had to refuse for a number of reasons.


I saw several doctors requesting to prescribe medications concerning the borderline or elevated sugar in blood, motivating my request by the risk of the development of diabetes and cataract.


But everywhere I was refused.


I still did not receive almost any medical care in connection with the further progression of arthritis.


Though the approximate untwistings of the mechanism of rheumatic problems was already clear, all the same doctors persistently refused the prescription of anti-inflammatory, and only the new rheumatologist (to whom my family doctor sent me) prescribed Celebrex.


The urological problems, meanwhile, gradually disappeared after the operation.


All functions were restored - as was before the "mysterious" infection and the beginning of these problems in 2001, and at the same - former - level. However - from time to time - some symptoms, such as pain, pressure in the bladder at depletion, as well as groin pain on the right side, or in the crotch, etc. - sometimes appeared. Still, they did not disturb the prospects of restoration of my social life and even of job search (despite my age), and my activities.


In the first months of 2017, I also saw my family doctor concerning the gastroenterological problems, impossibility to sit normally ("ulcerous", becoming wet, dermatitis in the crotch area, etc.), pains in the stomach and intestines, pancreas and hypochondrium.


My family doctor sent me for X-ray. He also administrated - during this period - the laboratory analyses.


While the attitude towards me from doctors and medical institutions suddenly improved, manipulations with diagnostic procedures and analyses continued.


So, the processing and the report of the ultrasound and the X-ray (the beginning of 2022) leaves many questions. That X-ray continued a chain of sabotage of medical exams under the pretext that, allegedly, "because of the gases" "nothing is visible".


I already described in all detail in this chronicle why it is cannot be the truth. But, recalling some of the details, let's remind that, in particular, before that X-ray I cleaned very well and successfully the stomach and intestines, beforehand taking activated carbon and sinae (having learned how many hours prior to X-ray it is possible to take this pill), fasting 2 days, and, as usually at stomach X-ray, they gave me to drink a special solution of barium.


All these problems did not spoil my optimistic mood and did not stop the restoration of my health in general. I believe that I was able to recover from the blow to my health by the wild medical sabotage and terrorist acts against my physical and psychological integrity ONLY due to my moderate medical knowledge and my body's rare ability for revitalization and regeneration.


And then the next unfortunate drama erupted, which began with the acute pain in the left eye, followed by very strong headache in the temporal (on both sides) and occipital area.


To my huge regret, all records about this unfortunate event are somehow missing, and even the date of this new turmoil is not known precisely.


Just this alone point at my recurrent serious psychological state (as a reaction to this new misfortune), and at all circumstances, which continued to develop not in my advantage.


I only remembered that, on the day of the close angles' syndrome attack, or a day before, or a day or two prior to the left eye wild pain attack, the number of the date included the figure "7". It could be the following dates: March 17, March 27, or April 7, 2017.


For various reasons, neither earlier, nor later this attack could not take place. But, if it was one day after April 7-th, 2017, then, in that case, it happened next day after passing the heart X-ray. Moreover, on the next day (after the X-ray), I called to the same clinic (where there is a radiology (in the same building): because my state suddenly worsened, and asked about how I can see the same doctor. It - indirectly - can assume that the eye pain attack began - at first - with a little notable pain and other insignificant symptoms - on April 7, 2017, next day after the X-ray. (It is almost excluded, but - after all - it is possible (though - hardly) that this attack happened at the end of February, 2017).


It is possible that if I addressed - at once by then - to Emergency - within the first 2-3 hours, - my eye would be saved, and serious glaucoma would not develop. But - because of pain, dark strips and flashes in my eyes, and multi-colored circles in the left eye - I could not go to emergency alone, without attendants, could not reach a hospital, and, for a number of reasons, there was nobody who could accompany me. I could not stare also at the computer screen, and was not able to find - in my database of medical information or on the Internet the instructions on how many hours I have; i.e. in how many hours after the beginning of such attack the changes will become already irreversible. But I (all the same) knew the threats and risks, because I told to my relatives that if I do not go to hospital, then I can lose an eye.


The only thing that remained to me: to call the ambulance (9-1-1), though it was difficult because of the next decrease in hearing and a new episode of almost total loss of voice.


Besides, I could be refused an ambulance on the ground that I did not lose the mobility. But the main thing: it is the panic of expected mockeries in any Emergency, which literally paralyzed me, without allowing to pick up the phone - and to call the number 9-1-1.


And this is the "merit" of doctors-sadists and triage nurses, who scorned over me not less than the doctors. All scandalous incidents in the emergency departments in Montreal hospitals are - in details - described in this chronicle.


And, at last, the last thing that stopped me: it is that I can reach an Emergency, but not see a doctor and being refused the intraocular pressure measurement, having uselessly stayed in the waiting room 4-9 (or more) hours without any results. And my fears were not deprived of the basis.


When in October, 2018, I addressed to an emergency room with the same symptoms and risk to lose an eye, having stayed more than 5 hours, I not only was not examined by a doctor, but also was refused the intraocular pressure verification, and, after all, they said to me that now it is necessary to wait for many more hours (probably, more than 12 hours), and I was forced to return back home without ANY medical help.


But that, the very first attack of the closed-angles syndrome (which led to glaucoma) - was even more dangerous, but the torture of hours-long waiting in brutal conditions (even the chairs for waiting rooms in the emergency departments, perhaps, are deliberately chosen more rigid and more inconvenient to turn people away from the emergences), stressful situation and all outraged peculiarities of the typical treatment in hospitals' emergences could only worsen my state and provoke blindness - instead of measures for glaucoma prevention.


This next drama - the development of the closed-angle glaucoma: was a direct consequence of the mockeries and sabotage during my addresses to ophthalmologists, in eye clinics, and in emergency departments of Montreal hospitals, and also was the product of the access to eyes exam denial in 2 eye clinics, despite 2 later referrals to ophthalmologists from 2 doctors.


I warned the ophthalmologists, hospitals, and clinics that their actions will lead to further destruction of my sight and to consequences, unpredictable and sad for me, and also reported about the ophthalmological sabotage (2003-2011) in my chronicle "The license to kill", in my letters to friends, relatives and acquaintances, etc.


Doctors and medical institutions of Montreal take full responsibility for what happened to mine eyes.


Apparently, the closed-angle syndrome and the abnormal intraocular pressure - were present already in 2013-2014, when I addressed to St.-Mary's Hospital's emergency department concerning the vitreous body detachment, but I was not registered in St.-Mary's Eye Clinic, was denied the follow-ups, was not put under control of an ophthalmologist, not registered as a patient in St. Mary's eye clinic with an opportunity to visit the oculists; they did not give me in hands any documents, they reported nothing to my family doctor concerning the eyes problems.


The same repeated then in a private clinic in 2013-2014.


Now, in 2017, I am month or two after the 1-st vicious glaucoma attack (depending on when the first attack happened) - unsuccessfully tried to obtain an access to an ophthalmologist.


I addressed to clinics without rendezvous, to specialists-doctors, whom I visited with a request to help to see an ophthalmologist, in the eye clinic of St. Mary's Hospital, and to other places.


This drama with my vision is described in more details in the series of this work called "Who Destroyed my Vision and Hearing".


Not occasionally the whole avalanche of health problems has fall on me in April, 2017: the eczema on the left elbow, which tormented me for months; the sharp deterioration of the lower extremities blood vessels problem; and not less than 10 other illnesses fell upon me one by one.


Then I deeply cut (under suspicious circumstances) the forefinger of the right hand, and the whole new saga of medical help denial started right away. An infection quickly spread all over the finger, and, probably, injured the cartilage of the main joint, and provoked a deformation.


As a result, this forefinger became much thicker than the forefinger of the left hand.


All this occurred against the background of medical sabotage, when I was refused the very basic, the most critical medical treatment, and the medics completely ignored the fact that all problems with this finger began because of a cut and the spread of an infection. I could not get a prescription of antibiotics, anti-inflammatory, physical therapy, and other medical help, and the report of this finger's X-ray was composed with the purpose to correspond to doctor's policy of the austerity, and to protect him and his decision not to appoint any medical measures (to me).


Now not only the hearing degradation and the damage (by arthritis) of the left wrist joint and left shoulder prevented me to play a piano as freely as before, but also the deformed forefinger of the right hand.


All these pathological changes could be prevented or cured if not the medical sabotage.


Meanwhile, the iridotomy, which was done too hasty, without waiting for the effect of the conservative treatment, and without granting a choice option - between iridotomy and the replacement of crystalline lens (which can stop the closed-angle syndrome better and solve all problems), or other treatment methods, and without providing a chance to get an access to the optical nerve picture BEFORE the iridothomy (on what on to me insisted, but was refused).


The expected more aggressive conservative treatment, with application of different means, from drops to orally taken medicines, was not used. Instead, Dr. Gans blackmailed me, saying that if I will not agree for iridotomy, he's going to stop my treatment and expel me from the group of his patients. He also boosted the fear in me of losing my vision, threatening that - without the urgent iridotomy I can go blind, and presenting the iridotomy as an ONLY solution. Having no access to another ophthalmologist, I had no other options, but to stay with Dr. Gans in the midst of the vision-threatening glaucoma crises.


For my part, it would be unethical to reproach the doctor who, maybe, saved to me eyes, but, on the other hand, the iridotomy became for me very damaging in itself: the iridotomy provoked the cataract, which was not present before; it, perhaps, did a stronger injury to the optical nerve during this laser operation; the iridotomy caused terrible disphotopsia and night vision degradation; as the result of iridotomy, the pupil has narrowed; iridotomy generated wild visual aberrations; etc. The angles - all the same - did not open; the intraocular pressure remained - all the same - badly controlled by eye drops; but no additional drops were appointed, which opened a wide door for further injury of the optical nerve and faster development of the cataract. No further surgical measures were REALLY proposed or suggested.


I guess, that, perhaps, all this occurred only because I have no funds for non-public treatment in a private clinic like that; because I have no private health insurance, and, thus - I would become a too expensive patient for Dr. Gans if he applied other scenario.


Dr. Sejean, the otolaryngologist, meanwhile, actually, sabotaged the hearing and voice cords treatment, provoking an additional obstacle for my social and professional life. In 2017 and after, I had new health issues and medical ordeals, partially described in other parts of this work.


CONCLUSIONS (SUMMARY)


In my case, the state (public) system of medical care was used as a repressive tool for prosecution and physical elimination of dissidents. Whoever stood behind these repressive methods (the state, the foreign governments with their long hands in Canada, or groups of particular individuals): they do not meet any restrictions or obstacles on Canadian territory.


In the last 10 years (from Harper to Trudeau), doctors, and medical institutions began to cooperate actively with the repressive agencies in planting and using the political repressions.


The general fear and the estimated retaliatory response to any disagreement with the authorities (or disobedience, insubordination, etc.) intimidated doctors and prevented their readiness to help the victims doomed by the health care system. One of the best in the world, Canadian medical care, nevertheless, quickly becomes a relic copy of repressive services of the tyrannical European regimes in the 1930-s.


As for my own case: only the brave help of some health workers can help me, and only Quebec or Canadian authorities at the highest level, or an international intervention can save me. Without such an intervention, I can not survive too long.


P.S. It is necessary to add that, in many cases, my social and economic status forces me to see the doctors. So, if I had an opportunity to buy voltaren or some ingredients for independently prepared medicines, in some cases I could cope without anti-inflammatory medications. That is why doctors' actions so often become a matter of life and death.


And the last. Since 2012 until the beginning of 2016, the search engines - from Yahoo to Google - systematically sabotage my access to the most essential medical information.


In parallel - there was a misinformation campaign, when I was redirected on those pages, where the lie concerning any disease and its mechanism contained.


So, I could not come for months to elementary figures of the intraocular pressure norm and danger of its boundary indicators, etc.


Therefore, the censorship, profiling, espionage on users and destruction of anonymity and "privacy", the status of "reliability" or "unreliability", and totalitarian practice of the international corporations (such as Facebook) and social networks - take full responsibility for undermining my health, in not a smaller degree than the "medicine" in non-virtual reality.


(The records for February, 2017, and the Conclusion were added in November, 2018).


----- THE END OF 2017 EDITION -----

_______________________


NOW, AN ADDITION OF 2017-2022 FOLLOWS. [SEE THE NEXT BOOK]


_________________


Lev Gunin


THE PUNITIVE HEALTH CARE

[HEALTH CARE AS A REPRESSIVE TOOL]


BOOK 5-12


THE UROLOGICAL DRAMA. PART 12.


CONTENT


CHAPTER 1. March, 2017.

CHAPTER 2. May-August 2017.

CHAPTER 3. September-October 2017.

CHAPTER 4. November-December 2017.

CHAPTER 5. January-May 2018.

CHAPTER 6. June-December 2017

CHAPTER 7. January-April 2017.

CHAPTER 8. May-December 2017.

_________


* * *


The whole text of the chronological events and medical documents (under the name of "The Punitive Health Care - (Health Care as a Repressive Tool)" is available for examination only on the basis of the following contract between the author and the reader:


I (THE READER) GIVE MY CONSENT THAT, BY CLICKING CORRESPONDING LINKS AND ACCESSING THE TEXT OF "THE PUNITIVE HEALTH CARE", I AUTOMATICALLY AGREE TO THE FOLLOWING PRELIMINARY CONDITIONS [FOR READING]:


-- I am (at least) 18 years old.


1. I (the reader) is undertaking (commit myself) not to distribute the text of "The Punitive Health Care - (Health Care as a Repressive Tool)" - entirely, or in fragments; not to copy medical documents; and not to share the text and images without author' permission.


2. I (the reader) understand that the confidential information, which is contained in this text, cannot be used for any other [than the reading (extraneous; secondary)] purposes and needs, for any researches, essays, stories, etc.


3. I (the reader) commit myself not to sneer at open ticklish personal information (which sharing was induced by circumstances), not to savor any medical, physiological, or anatomic details, and not to use this text as a reason for mockery and persecution.


4. I (the reader) am warned by the author that, except for a number of obviously immoral (by definition) doctors' and medical staff's actions, other decisions and acts described in this "confession" are not subjected to hasty moral assessment because a) only experts can judge finally about their justification and fairness; b) explanations and vindications of other party are necessary. We also do not know to what degree the doctors were under an influence and direct power of police, Ministry of Immigration, and other enforcement agencies, political organizations, groups and persons - with their own ideological, economic, and propaganda interests, - and to what degree this influence impacted on their diagnostic conclusions and assessments of patient's state of health. Many of the documentary confirmed facts incontestably demonstrate that author's ideological stand (who's opposing to younger generation's transformation into zombie-biorobots with mobile phones on shoulders instead of heads; to electronic totalitarianism with its prison-like total video surveillance; and to the tyrannical political censorship) played nearly a major role in enraging the authorities and triggering the persecutions.


5. I (the reader) am warned that the author sees the main cause of the most dramatic (for him) events in the fact that the enforcement agencies and interested persons and groups managed to present him to the medical community as an individual incapable to evaluate his health condition objectively; as a health-consciousan (or hypochondriac); an extremist; a troublemaker; an individual obsessed with panic and alarm patterns; as a person, who is making unreal demands to the system of medical care - concerning his - allegedly - pseudo-maladies and exaggerated gravity of trivial indispositions. This smear campaign of defamation, scurrilous libel, and wicked calumny made impossible receiving an adequate medical care (and sometimes any medical help at all), and led to health undermining, numerous diseases, incidents, and unnecessary sufferings. Doctors also considered difficult to believe in continuous (not connected with each other) illnesses, with an interval of 4-7 days, sometimes rolling at the same time: as tsunami. They refused to believe in these sequences of illnesses' painful course, danger, and significance. This chronicle disproves such a prejudiced opinion, producing an incontestable evidence.


6. I (the reader) am informed that all negative remarks, characteristics, and facts' assessments belong only to the portrayal of criminal groups, extremists, and carriers of anti-humanistic, racist, and totalitarian ideology, but do not contain groundless generalizations and negative assessment of any country, ethnic group, or religion. The author is categorically against dismantling of any of the existing states, and against restrictions of the rights of religious congregations of any faith.


7. I (the reader) am informed that this edition partially presents the previous 2017 edition without any changes, and, thus, may not correspond to later view and opinions.


8. I (the English reader) am informed that some parts of the following English text of "The Punitive Health Care" - were translated from Polish, Russian, or French originals, and may contain primitive language, double interpretation, or puzzled meaning. Such confusing fragments should be compared with their originals in Polish and Russian languages (author's native languages) [2016-2017]; all controversial points must be resolved through such a comparison.


9. In the very last moment of this edition's make-up (April 2023), the author came across a description of so-called Havana-syndrome, and found same symptoms and complications, which he experienced when was attacked by an unknown remote weapon (3 Nov. 2005, 7 Jan. 2013, and 21 June 2016), and developed symptoms of post-microwave irradiation.


_________


CHAPTER 1. March, 2017.


March, 2017.


March 1-8, 2017.

On March 1, 2017, I passed a stomach X-Ray (8:15) in Clarke Imagery, on requisition of my family doctor. I fasted 2 days, and did all the preparation to ensure the best quality of the result. However, it did not make any changes (as I learned later).


As we can see, no abnormalities, which were found by previous scans, are mentioned. This is the shortest, and, probably, unreliable test.


Since the 1-st urological operation, and, especially, since the 2-nd, I was experiencing strong stomach pain, serious constipations, or dangerous diarrhea.


March 29, 2017.

On March 29, 2017, I had an appointment with my family doctor at 8:40.


I complained about still remaining urological problems, and asked my family doctor to refer me to a urologist in Montreal, because the public transportation to the distant part of Point-Clair (to Dr. El-Hakim) is inconvenient and bad.


My family doctor called 3 specialists-urologists, but all of them refused to take me as a patient.


He did not say directly that the last stomach X-Ray is unreliable, but he hinted it.


Concerning the arthritis problems, he gave me 2 brochures with special physical exercises.


I also asked about an echocardiogram, complaining about heart pain, arrhythmia and tachycardia, but he ignored this request.


APRiL 2017


April 5, 2017.

5 Apr. 2017, at 8:30, I came to Metro-Medic walk-in clinic with heart pain, arrhythmia and tachycardia. However, I received no help, no tests, no answers, and no recommendations.


April 6, 2017.

6 Apr., 2017, at 8:50, I came to Metro-Medic again. This time, 2 tests - cardiogram + Heart X-Ray - were administrated. The cardiogram - again - has shown 2 abnormalities (as everyone can see below), and the 3-rd abnormality is in question.


The heart X-ray is, likely, has shown no abnormalities.

I must remind that the 1-st abnormal cardiogram was the pre-operational cardiogram, when Dr. Morris, who mocked on me and committed many brutal acts, was preparing me for a litholopaxy operation.


April 7, 2017.

In my diary and in my agenda, I found the mentioning about the acute left eye pain; however, I am not sure if this record was entered by then (on April, 7, 2017), or was added 1-2 months later, from memory.


But, if this is an original note, then this 1-st such close angles-glaucoma syndrome could happen because something went wrong during the heart x-ray (6 Apr. 2017), or because medics did not address my heart problems (despite the abnormal cardiogram and my complains about serious heart problems).


While then, during the whole month, the acute glaucoma and the emergency vision situation was devastating the optical nerve, I was denied an access to ophthalmological care.


As a result of 7-years denial of ophthalmological care, the optical nerve was damaged, and I received other eyes' injuries. I turned to 5 walk-in clinics, to 4 eye clinics, and to other medical institutions, but no access to an ophthalmologist (and even to eye-tonometers: to measure the IOP) was provided to me.


If not my family doctor - the only doctor, who organized an urgent IOP measuring and an ophthalmological care, I could go blind.


However, I could not get an access to my family doctor till 28 Apr. 2017, because 2 times, when I came with walk-in visits, something serious happened (I forgot the details: maybe, he was called to a patient to a hospital, or a patient fainted in his office; something like this), and for a week or two my family doctor, likely, was just absent, and did not work.


April 28, 2017.

28 Apr. 2017: I visited my family doctor (Dr. Rohan), at 9:30, complaining mostly about renewed urological, and heart problems. Bordering desperation, my worries that 2 urological operations were fruitless - forced me to speak mostly about my concerned about that, but Dr. Rohan suddenly asked me if I still have the headaches.


I nodded in confirmation, and said that mostly the headache concentrates in the temples and the nape's areas.


He replied that he suspects high intraocular pressure, and then I started to complain about my suspicious of close angles syndrome and glaucoma.


My family doctor proposed the Holzer cardio-machine, instead of echocardiogram, but I insisted on the echocardiogram. He said that this is a problem for him, for some reasons, and I believed him.

He then gave me a referral to "a very good optometrist", and personally called Dr. Rheum, asking the latter to examine me as soon as possible. Dr. Rheum said that he has a niche for an appointment only for the 3-rd May.


April 29, 2017.

Some positive changes in my treatment in medical institutions ended very quickly. All consequences for my health cause by the urological drama ordeals were left unaddressed by the medical workers.


In general, the repressions in hospitals and other medical institutions (against me) and doctors' aggressive behavior - after operation in December, 2016: sharply declined.


But it did not stop the separate surges in their recurrence. And, the most important thing: very soon some elements of the former mistreatment in medical institutions came back.


Police intimidation and surveillance, and "civil" cars' and agents' surveillance - continued, especially during my visits to medical institutions (as before).


Unless it happened now without former demonstrativeness, intensity and aggressive persistence.


I enjoyed only a temporary "pacification" and internal comfort (if it is possible to call the going on depression "a calm" (which, nevertheless, began to decline (having completely disappeared only in July, 2017, and, thus, having lasted the whole year) in February - March, 2017, but soon a new dramatic misfortunes burst, which made my life even more uncomfortable.


These are, first, the cardiovascular problems, which were still ignored by doctors. It was absolutely clear that neither cardiograms, nor heart X-rays can show anything new (in comparison with the cardiogram done in May, 2016, which - for the first time in my life - showed the "Preliminary wave succession", and then this pathology became permanent). Neither the reasons of "Preliminary wave succession", nor the cause of heartaches, nor the problems with blood vessels, tachycardia episodes (especially at the moments of awakening, changing from standing to horizontal position, or standing up), and arrhythmias: were assessed.


Requisitions for echocardiogram and on so-called "stress test" were systematically refused to me. I saw several doctors, but none of them agreed to administrate them. When Canadian Federal Immigration planned to sabotage the procedural process of our immigration procedure, Immigration doctors issued the obligatory medical exams, which they compulsory forced us to pass, including the echocardiogram. By then, the "immigration" echocardiogram was used for generating the falsified statements on my mother's health issues (to sabotage the normal application of her permanent residence status acquiring); in its turn, the "immigration" fluorography was used to produce the falsified diagnosis "tuberculosis". This contrast shows - how the federal authorities (subordinating to their British masters) are easily using the health system's medical exams to oppress and to kill, but deny the requisitions, when they serve for healing and saving human lives.


Only my family doctor, as always, directed me for not only a repeated cardiogram, but also offered one of possible diagnostic options, which I, however, had to refuse for a number of reasons.


I did not ask him about a requisition on an echocardiogram, wishing not to push him towards an ethical dilemma and threat of troubles.


I saw several doctors, asking them about a possibility of prescription of medications, which are used to control the sugar level at pre-diabetic borderline glucose, motivating my request by the risk of developing diabetes and cataract. But - everywhere - it was refused. I know from a number of people that they are receiving such a therapy, but I am denied it for many years.


I still did not receive almost any medical care in connection with the further advancement of arthritis. Though the approximate mechanism of the rheumatic problems was already clear, all the same, doctors persistently refused anti-inflammatory and other therapeutic measures, and only the new rheumatologist (to whom my family doctor referred me) prescribed Celebrex.


The urological problems, meanwhile, gradually all disappeared after 2 operations. All functions have been restored - as was before the "mysterious" infection at the beginning of these problems in 2001. But - from time to time - some symptoms, such as pain - sometimes appeared at depletion; groin pain on the right side, or in a crotch, etc. However, they did not menace to the prospects of my social life restoration (and even job search (despite my age), and my professional activity.


In the first months of 2017, I saw my family doctor also concerning the gastroenterological problems, impossibility to sit normally (the "ulcers" turned into a wet dermatitis, etc.), stomach & intestines pains, pancreas and hypo-chondrium.


He arranged an abdominal X-ray and laboratory analyses.


While the attitude towards me from doctors and medical institutions temporarily improved, the manipulations with diagnostic procedures and analyses continued.


The processing and the reports of ultrasound and X-ray (during this period) leave many questions. That X-ray has continued a chain of sabotage under the pretext that, allegedly, "because of gases" "nothing is visible".


I already described this sabotage method repeatedly in details in this chronicle, explaining - why it is a lie and why it could not happen.


And, in particular, before that X-ray, I well and successfully prepared myself, excluding any similar failure.


And - then - the next sad drama has begun with an acute pain in the left eye...


Now, let's list the number of health problems, which were continuously ignored by medical workers, who denied me the an adequate or, in general, any medical help.


1. Since 2007, medical workers continued to refuse a) an echocardiogram, and b) also ultrasound duplex and Double Doppler of the lower extremities (the veins were twice injured, when I was hit by car and attacked by "unknown" hooligans); c) a referral to cardiologist (I once lost access to doctor Kostiuk: perhaps, he retired).

Partially the permanent refusal of my (above-stated) requests can be connected to criminal cover up, when St. Mary Hospital's Emergency Department staff started to protect the driver of the car, which hit me in 2007. (See the series The Mistreatment of my Injuries in this work).

2. Ignoring of vascular-cerebral problems - connected to 3 episodes of inexplicable indispositions on November 3, 2005; January 7, 2013; and June 21, 2016.

I did not receive any explanations, any diagnoses (from doctors).

The computer tomography (administrated by my family doctor after the 2-nd of 3 similar episodes) did not explain (concerning January 7, 2013) the origins of the (found) pathologies, their reason and time limitation (long standing frames).

These episodes were followed by the symptoms similar to symptoms of microwave irradiation or blow of an ultrasonic or low-frequency wave.

3. Deadlock status of diagnostics and treatment of my gastroenterological problems: the numerous laboratory analyses, X-rays, ultrasonography, colonoscopy, computer tomography, and other exams appeared to be non-reliable; for example, part of the medical scans claimed that they "saw nothing" under the pretext of "abdominal gases", or for other reasons. (It is documentary shown in this chronicle).

In 1996, Dr. Mishkin appointed a course of antibiotics concerning a gastric infection, and, then, no gastroenterological problems disturbed me up to 2006. In 2007 or 2008: the endoscopy done in the old Royal Victoria Hospital (its result and all the data disappeared).

2009-2010: 2 exams by means of a manual endoscope in Dr. Szego's office.

After 2010, such inspections never repeated.

2012: September 22, 2012 - colonoscopy. Only 1 single page of the report was available; other pages of the procedure report disappeared. What remained: are splenic bend - telangiectatic; sigmoidal - vascular changes. Recommendations: to remain under doctor's observation, waiting for the results of biopsy. The results of biopsy never surfaced; the pathologies revealed by colonoscopy considered "insignificant"; no treatment was appointed.

Colonoscopy's complications were devastating: gross! hematuria + self-produced hematosp. + hematochezia; acute urological infection; fever; temperature; severe (terrible!) pain; blood clots discharges (fibrinferments) uric and from the intestines, etc.

After colonoscopy, the gastroenterological problems doubled.

2011-2019: hematochezia episodes: for example - on March 8, 2011 [Tuesday] (hematochezia + hematuria); March 6, 2012 [Tuesday] (hematochezia + hematuria); July 7, 2012 [Saturday] (hematochezia); March 5, 2013 [Tuesday] (hematochezia + hematuria); July 7, 2013 [Sunday] (hematochezia); March 4, 2014 [Tuesday] (hematochezia); November 25, 2014 [Tuesday] (spontaneous hematochezia); March 7, 2015 [Saturday] (hematochezia + hematuria); October 27, 2016 [Thursday] (hematochezia); March 2-3, 2016 [Wednesday-Tuesday] (gross! hematochezia + hematuria); March 9-11, 2019 [Saturday-Monday] (hematochezia). + After colonoscopy.

The permanent "proctologic" ulcerization became wet dermatitis since 2011.

The partial chronic obstruction of intestines and extreme chronic constipations lead to episodes of the damage to the lower part of the intestines. I consider the gastroenterologist (Dr. Szego) a great expert and wonderful person, who did almost everything possible to save me from bigger problems. However, he could not do much, because of the sabotage on the government's level, fraudulent manipulations with my laboratory tests, etc. As for the intolerable (in terms of permanent illness, suffering, and serious decrease of the quality of life) situation: I lay all blames for this situation on hospitals and laboratories, but not on Dr. Szego, for whom the solution of that outrageous situation lies outside of his administrative and medical opportunities.

4. The deadlock in the solution of this shocking situation (I mean the never-ending sabotage of medical care), in connection with the sphere of the ear-throat-nose problems, was based on Dr. Sejean's sabotage of medical treatment and unavailability of another otolaryngologist.

It is described in details in this chronicle what mental and physical suffering caused this sabotage, and how the lack of medical treatment destroyed my normal professional activity and my social life.

5. Meanwhile, the lack of access to an adequate treatment of arthritis continued after 2017 as well.

I am constantly threatened by the loss of functionality, and - then - by a possibility to find myself in a wheelchair.

AFTER the peak of the urological drama (described here) and other dramatic events, doctors and medical institutions continue to refuse timely, adequate, and operational medical treatment, from the prescription of anti-inflammatory drugs, to endocrinology-related examination, inflammation and infection sources findings, and of the study of the influence of dental care unavailability - for better understanding of the roots of the arthritis, against the background of physiotherapy exercises and other treatment unavailability to me.

After the departure of Dr. Anna Kananyan (the rheumatologist) to USA (she saved me for 2 and a half years from further development of arthritis), the adequate diagnostic procedures are blocked.

The sabotage of the recognition of obvious pathologies by doctors and radiologists continues.

Neither bones density scan, nor ultrasound of shoulder joint, nor other diagnostic procedures are available to me after Dr. Anna Khananyan's departure.

Sabotage of diagnostics and treatment led to deformation of the right forefinger joint, shoulder joint, and its soft tissues.

The lack of resources does not allow me to buy Voltaren and other means in drugstores, and doctors - in turn - do not prescribe any remedies, which I could receive with a medical prescription on discount or free.

The sabotage of the treatment of bones-joints injuries - received in a result of set up accidents, attacks, provocations, and diversions - continues.

In 15 years, doctors did not read for me ANY diagnosis. None of them answered my questions, what is a diagnosis of my disease; what type of arthritis do I have; what triggers it, and whether it is possible to stop these causes.

6. After 2 urological operations, the sabotage of the ophthalmological care continued, and caused the damage to the optical nerve, severe glaucoma, and other complications. Dr. Gans, an only ophthalmologist available for me, did an irreversible damage to my eyes, provoked cataract, destroyed my vision, and triggered a lot of other complications.

My titanic work on improving my health, all my efforts of self-treatment cannot result in long-term success without diagnostics and knowledge of what happens to my bones and joints, what are the roots of other health problems, in the situation of sabotage (by doctors) to present any diagnosis.


These are only 6 of dozens of other major problems, which solution's denial triggers a permanent torture.


It is necessary to agree that the misrepresentations by doctors of the conclusions of the medical exams and ignoring of obvious pathologies - for the sake of austerity, concealment of their colleagues' and their own mistakes, or for the goals of politically-ideologically motivated persecutions, - and manipulations with my tests and analyses for the same reasons (i.e. if the result of a laboratory analysis confirms a mistake of a doctor, it vanishes or being forged) represent a deadly threat to patient's health and life, and that, proceeding from the usual common sense, if it occurs, then any procedure - not only such dangerous as cystoscopy, colonoscopy, etc., but even a "simple" blood test - potentially poses the same deadly threat by definition.


An additional sinister alarm is represented by the fact that I did not receive any real answer to my complaints from medical ombudsmen; the access to requested information on social, political, or psychiatric insinuations in my medical file, which is blocked for me and for my representatives; I also never received any answer from police concerning my lodged statements with the police on attacks and attempts; I never received any response from the police on my inquiry about hundreds of interceptions, detentions and interrogations by police (and 2 episodes of searches), police demonstrative surveillance, police escorts, etc., from 2005 to 2014 - and also did not receive any explanation - why the police systematically accompanied me on my way to doctors, hospitals, and on my way to other medical destinations.


On my example, it is realizable - to which abyss pushes us the planting in Canada (since 2001) of the totalitarian-repressive model and strict tyrannical political censorship, and what will happen to each resident of this country if even more tyrannical "liberal" legislations of "safety" (and "security") will be advanced by the Harper-Trudeau government. If the transformation of the democratic countries goes by such a course as today, and such regimes with "human face" as Canada will change their colors, only the gendarme tyrannies alone will remain in the world, increasing governments' political intrusion into the sphere of medicine, injecting the functions of gendarme control and sadistic cruelty into the public health care.


Today, in 2017, the Canadian legislative circles are advancing radical extremists' laws of so-called "medically assisted death", which practice is especially aggressively pushed by Quebec female deputies: "democrats", "secularists", radical feminists, and the most vicious careerists - go-getters. Such evil personalities, through their conscious or unconscious rebellion against the Nature, which has "chosen" the female for the mission of the reproductive performance, and attached to the female a mechanical-physiological (anatomic) function of an "inside" friction, are becoming the carriers of an opposite to life givers assignment: the status of the carriers of Death. You don't have to be a prophet for foreseeing that - in 5-7 years - Quebec will inevitably become a world leader in so-called "medically assisted death" (euthanasia), murdering more sick, handicap, elderly, mentally-ill, or socially deprived people than any other state in the world. Thus, the restoration of Hitler's legislation, which allowed the German fascists to murder innumerous "defective" "human species", is very near, signaling about the end of humanitarian era, and the beginning of the era of anti-humanism. The demolished Quebec's public health care and Quebec's social consensus / de-segregation is already replaced by the medically-assisted murder and by social genocide (mass murder of hundreds of thousands of poor, unprivileged, homeless, and of other categories of socially deprived people).


The medical system is starting to function by the principle "not to heal, but to kill", and my personal case is a rare and perfect illustration of the origins of this radical shift.


On the curdling blood irony, the unprecedented, improbable scientific and technical achievements, and new "magic" medical technologies not only did not make people healthier and happier, but (contrary to all the conveniences and advantages of the modern life in the developed countries) only increased the percent of people suffering from numerous diseases and began to be used as a weapon ("not to heal, but to kill") of blackmail, repressions, and tyrannical suppression of all freedoms and rights.


The criminal medical system (which construction was started in 2001) and criminal social policy will inevitably cause serious social disturbances and the radical splash of the criminal activity.


Still, in the late 1990-s and at the beginning of 2000-s, I already foretold that, despite to total shadowing of innocent citizens and police-state video / digital totalitarian control, the crimes will begin to grow with a speed of a geometrical progression in about 10-15 years, and the reason of the crimes' grows is the totalitarian police-state video surveillance, because the citizens in big cities will soon begin to feel like prisoners, and - according to psychology of prisoners - will begin to commit incredible number of crimes.


My case gives a unique opportunity to analyze - to the level of preparation, - the influence on human life of the consequences of the totalitarian electronic prison global control.


The most terrible, in my opinion: is the use of medical care for the purpose of political repressions that crosses out the nature of normal functioning of human society.


But why someone needs to use medicine as a method of punishing the objectionable persons, if it is possible to do a "set up" (throwing drugs or other forbidden substances, objects, or images (to a victim); fabricaing false accusations of "sexual harassments", etc.), to turn a dissident into a disabled person by employing a road "accident", or beating, or even to kill an objectionable person?


However, first, the attacks and other terrorist acts, and the arranged fallings were already used against me (it is told about them in the separate chronicle available on Sergey Balandin's website and in Maxim Mashkov's library).


Secondly, here is, apparently, a process of developing an experimental technique by means of which the authorities of a number of countries wish to solve internal and foreign policy problems, making Canada their testing ground.


Thirdly, using the hidden repressions (the punitive medical care), Canadian Tyranny Masters are expecting to claim that Canada has no political prisoners (which is not true even formally, but, in the same time, the number of the political prisoners in Canada is incomparably lower than in some other countries), no concentration camps (it is also not true, not speaking about Canadian concentration camps during the First and the Second World Wars), and that Canada is a human rights champion (which was true ONLY in 1980-s, till approximately 1993). Instead of the bold physical force - brutal violence, the recently formed Harper-Trudeau oppressive regime has chosen a less visible, but not less massive and violent technological, administrative, medical, and social terror. These tactics and methods, as their creators assume, give them a greater control over society, better concealment of their crimes against humanity, and an opportunity to claim their deceptive (alleged) moral superiority over other oppressive regimes.


We, apparently, are witnessing a radical and BASIC reorganization of the whole repressive apparatus and its policies, living in such an era, when a final decision was made - to develop methods allowing secretly put out of action those, who have independent judgments: by means of high-tech technique (including secretly developed devices and equipment), computer and network technologies, social networks, and medicine, which is assigned nearly the central part.


As for Canada, here the system of medical care already represents quite a finished secret network of a potential repressive apparatus - owing to its exaggerated bureaucracy, mutual responsibility of the doctors and medics (covering up each other and hiding any sins of their colleagues), their total immunity from jurisdiction - in specific conditions of Canada, - and the permanent stage of the demolition of the whole public health care system caused substantially by its privatization, commercialization, and by the situation south of the Canadian borders.


Hidden repressions and veiled tyranny allow their architects to pursue also the ultra-aggressive foreign policy (typical for British empire), saying: here supposedly are brutal repressions in Iran or in China (detentions, tortures and executions), and here, at us - it is "democracy" and "human rights", and, under this pretext, to escalate a dangerous confrontation, which can lead to a nuclear war and total annihilation of human race, at the same time supporting more tyrannical regimes (incomparably greater human rights violators than Iran or China), and turning other regimes (very soft dictatorships) into brutal tyrannical systems by means of economic sanctions, political blockade, hostility and provocations, military aggression (including the "proxy wars"), or attempts to organize "orange revolutions" or coup d'états.


The same justification serves as a cover for further strengthening of totalitarian censorship in Canada, withdrawals of the whole layers of subjects and problems from the discourse, and permission to discuss SOME "burning" subjects only to the hosts of the state radio, and to 2-3 quasi-state TV, press centers, and radio stations, announcing any criticism - a "product" of the "intrigues" of China, Iran, North Korea, and Russia, or an "intervention in the election campaign", or something else: as claimed the tyrannical regimes of the 1930-s under the pretext of "fighting against the intrigues of the enemies".


The collapse of relatively humanitarian nature of the Canadian society in 1980-s - beginning of 1990-s and the start of social segregation and extreme social inequality since 2001, can not be separated from the collapse of the lucid and humanly sane medical care system.


It is necessary to stress that quite often I am forced to ask for medical care because of my pitiful social and economic status.


Even an opportunity to buy payable medications like Voltaren ointment in time and regularly is not always present; the same concerns the ingredients for independently prepared medicines, which - in some occasions - I could prepare to cope without anti-inflammatory.


That is why the actions of doctors so often become a matter of life and death.


There is also another very typical phenomenon, which highlights the international (global) synchronized attack on the rights of patients and dissidents, which practice all governments in coordination with each other, even if they are waging wars against each other. Since 2012 until the beginning of 2016, the search engines - from Yahoo to Google, and from Yandex (ru) to Mail.ru: systematically blocked my access to the most essential medical information... In parallel - there was a misinformation campaign, when I was redirected on those pages, which contained the lie concerning any disease and its mechanism.


So, I could not come for months to elementary figures, for example, of the norm of intraocular pressure and danger of its boundary indicators, etc.


How it occurred, who and why, and by what features blocked the "medical" Internet": I am telling in a separate chronicle, which can be accessed through Sergei Balandin's web site.


Therefore, censorship, profiling, espionage on users and elimination of anonymity and "privacy", the status of "reliability" or "unreliability", and totalitarian practice of the international corporations (such as Facebook) and social networks: take the full responsibility for undermining my health, in not a smaller degree than the "medicine" (the health care system) in non-virtual reality.


(The records for February 2017, and this Conclusion - were added in November 2018).


CHAPTER 2. May-August 2017.


May, 2017.


May 3, 2017.

On May 3, I visited the optometrist, Dr. Rheum, having a referral from my family doctor, Dr. Rohan, at 10.00. All my hopes that I don't have glaucoma and don't need the eyes surgery - have crashed. Dr. Rheum did everything to manage this emergency, but Dr. Gans, to whom he referred me (considering the urgency), caused a lot of damage to my eyes.

A new health tragedy started to evolve. (See the special series Who Destroyed my Vision and Hearing; within this work).


4 May 2017

On May 4, 2017, I visited Dr. Gans, ophthalmologist, for the first time, at 10:45.

My demands for the test of the digital picture of the optical nerve state (of the optic disk cube (optic disc map) was declined by Dr. Gans, even when I said that my sponsors woulf pay for such test. It is clear that Dr. Gans did not want to allow me to have an opportunity to compare a pre-iridothomy picture with the post-iridothomy picture (to assess the damage, caused by iridothomy).


10 May 2017

On May 10, I was at the clinic, where Dr. Gans works, at 10.30.

By denying the conservative treatment (effective eyes drops; etc.), Dr. Gans forced me to agree for the laser surgery - iridothomy - both eyes (I refused to allow operate the right eye).

Such a hectic, hasty rash for iridothomy damasked the intention not to allow my recovery. My vision was even more destroyed by the iridothomy.

Intraocular Pressure: L.E. 21, R.E. 19.

(See the special series "Who Destroyed my Vision and Hearing"; within this work).


19 May 2017

On May 19, I visited my family doctor (Dr. Rohan), at 9:00. He did not offer a "normal" echocardiogram (as I requested), but gave me a requisition paper for E. Cardiogramm + 24 h. heart test machine.

(Running forward: the cardiogram was abnormal; the heart machine test was not acceptable for me, and I ignored this requisition).

..........................................

At 11.30, I was at the Institut de l'oeil: before the R. Eye iridothomy, I wanted to hear an alternative opinion.

The intraocular pressure was: L. Eye 19, R. Eye 20.

Dr. Alotaibi said that the iridothomy is not a solution for my case. She said that - in my case - it will not open the close angle of the R. Eye, but will provoke cataract, and will only worsen my vision.

She proposed another solution: a cataract surgery, which can serve all the purposes, not only preventing the cataract development, but also serving as an ultimate solution for lowering the IOP.

Running forward: Contrary to her promise of a free cataract surgery, the clinic began to demand hundreds of dollars (on the stage of pre-operational high-tech tests already). I had no choices, but to drop all the procedures, and to refuse the further tests.

It is very possible that the government has sabotaged a free cataract surgery for me (a welfare recipient at this moment).

In the same time, my demand to do the picture of the optic disk cube (optic disc map) was declined, even after I said that I would pay for such test.

It is clear that someone did not want to allow me to have an opportunity to compare pre-iridothomy picture with the post-iridothomy picture.

(For details: see the special series "Who Destroyed my Vision and Hearing"; within this work).


25 May 2017

At 9.45 (May 25, 2017), Dr. Gans did a very aggressive attempt to pursue me with the laser iridotomy surgery, this time with an intention to operate the right eye.

Meanwhile, the IOP was - Left Eye 16, Right Eye 15: no need for iridothomy surgery, and, moreover, no need in a hasty rush for such a surgery.

I begged Dr. Gans to wait, observing more time the further development of the IOP situation, and giving me more time to decide.

However, he was relentless, threatened me to stop the treatment (if I would not agree for the iridothomy), and told me to come on 31 May 2017.


31 May 2017

At 11.30 - another tragic development: Dr. Gans, finally, forced me to allow the laser iridothomy operation on the right eye.

For the right eye, the consequences of iridothomy were several times more severe. (See the special series "Who Destroyed my Vision and Hearing"; within this work).

I suspect that he concealed from me the real Intraocular Pressure, telling nothing about the Left Eye's post-operational IOP (the R. eye laser surgery might provoke a considerable jump in the Left Eye IOP, causing the optical nerve further damage, and provoking cataract), and claiming that the Right Eye's post-operational pressure was 13 (if the Doctor told the truth).

Simultaneously, Dr. Gans ordered me to discontinue Xalatan.

(For details: see the special series "Who Destroyed my Vision and Hearing"; within this work).


JUNE 2017


7 June 2017

Dr. Gans, at 11.45 (For details: see the special series "Who Destroyed my Vision and Hearing"; within this work).


14 June 2017

Xalatan expired on 14 June!!! (For details: see the special series "Who Destroyed my Vision and Hearing"; within this work).


16 June 2017 -

The appointment with Dr. Noor Alotaibi at Institute d'Oeil de Montreal was changed from 9.00 to 11.15.

She made such a strong pressure (with the gonioscope) to my eyes, that it was followed by a scary worsening of my vision. Tragically, it became an additional factor for my decision to drop the cataract surgery option.

Running forward: Contrary to her promise of a free cataract surgery, the clinic began to demand hundreds of dollars (on the stage of pre-operational high-tech tests already). I had no choices, but to drop all the procedures, and to refuse the further tests.

It is very possible that the government has sabotaged a free cataract surgery for me (a welfare recipient at this moment).

In the same time, my demand to do the picture of the optic disk cube (optic disc map) was declined, even after I said that I would pay for such test.

It is clear that someone did not want to allow me to have an opportunity to compare pre-iridothomy picture with the post-iridothomy picture.

(For details: see the special series "Who Destroyed my Vision and Hearing"; within this work).


24 June 2017

An urgent visit to Dr. Gans was cancelled by the doctor.


29 June 2017

An urgent visit to Dr. Gans. IO ressure - 20 and 19. (For details: see the special series "Who Destroyed my Vision and Hearing"; within this work).


JULY 2017


5 July 2017

On July 5, 2017, I paid a visit to my family doctor (8.45).


6 July 2017

An urgent visit (at 9.00) to Dr. Gans. IOP - 20 and 19; visual field - bad Left Eye, better - Right Eye. A scan far advanced glaucoma (optic cube map - ONH - FRNL) was performed by Dr. Gans for free.


7 July 2017

At 9.10, I had a rendezvous with Dr. Sejean, and - after a bizarre attitude of Dr. Sejean - never came again to this doctor.


16 July 2017

Since the beginning of July 2017, I experienced a sudden appearance and quick worsening of the urological problems, which scared me to the panic, because I thought that 2 urological surgeries now will be reversed, and I'll find myself in the same situation as before these surgeries.


17 July 2017

At 16.15, I paid an emergency visit to Dr. El-Hakim.

He administrated all necessary tests and all essential procedures.


19 July 2017

On July 19, I spend almost 6 hours (from 9.00 to 14.30) at Dr. Gans' clinic. This emergency visit to Dr. Gans was caused by the new sudden worsening of my general vision, and, especially, my nocturne vision, which was unique before the iridothomy and allowed me to see every detail in darkness, and to distinguish details 60 meters ahead at night.

The intraocular pressure was 17 and 18.


19 and 20 July 2017

Rapid and major cataract advance pointed to iridothomy as to a trigger of the cataract.

Later, cataract was partially reversed, which also points to some unique features of my body, in the same time indicating that the source of cataract was the laser iridothomy surgery.


20 July 2017

At 14.00, I came to see Dr. Wang, the dermatologist.

She did everything that was needed to manage my skin problems, but this time for money (for a very small payment), while all medically necessary problems have to be addressed in Quebec free for welfare recipients like me.

The avalanche of my health problems in spring-summer 2017 was non-doubtfully caused by the long sabotage of my urological problems' treatment by Dr. Morris, and by the sabotage of other health problems, which could be easily solved by very simple medical means. A very important role in my health crisis also played police and other repressions, generated by the authorities.


24 Jul. 2017

At 9.00, I passed the uroflow test at Lakeshore Hospital.

The result found some mild worsening in comparison with the test 3 months after the surgery, but nothing dramatic.

Still, the worsening could worry a person with such a negative experience like me.


AUGUST 2017


9 Aug. 2017

From 7.20 (doctor came at 9.05) I was waiting at my family doctor's office. An emergency visit was needed because of the acute inflammation, infection, vascular problems, ulcerous dermatitis, and fungus at the crotch (perinea) area...

Dr. Rohan refused to: 1) prescribe another cream (I told ... + Canesten don't help), 2) arange an urgent visit to gastroenterologist, 3) explain, why that area is always wet.

He told that 1) it is not fungus, so 2) stop Canesten, and 3) use only ...; 2) wash 3 times per day.

For vascular problems, suspected valval insufficiency, venos. augmentation, and alarming varicose, and heart tachycardia, arrhythmia - nothing.

(Varicose and venos. augmentation later gone).


12 Aug. 2017

11.20 - an emergency visit to La Cite walk-in clinic, for same problems as on 9 Aug. 2017 I visited my family doctor.

Dr. R. Lachance said: it is local dermatitis + ulcers, etc.

Doctor said: fungus infection, don't wash, continue Canesten; he prescribed Beta-derm.


14 Aug. 2017

Dr. Gans, who had no will, resources, and possibilities to manage my vision problems at the private clinic, where he worked, referred me to Dr. Saheb, who worked at McGill University's Eye Clinic at new location of the Royal Victoria Hospital, Glan Site (tel.: (514) 843-1613; fax: (514) 934-4404).


The appointment was scheduled at 9:30 (Monday).


Dr. Saheb appeared to be a brilliant specialist and a decent man.


Just a referral to a specialist of such a rank, already places Dr. Gans at a different moral position, pointing to his involuntary role in so seriously damaging my already damaged vision.


By reasons, unknown to me, Dr. Gans did a series of unethical actions, forcing me to undergo the unfortunate for me (which was known in advance) laser iridothomy surgery, with almost no benefits. Moreover, my firm disagreement for the laser iridothomy of the Right Eye, he met with the same aggressive tactic to force me into next damaging for my eyes operation, and destroyed my right eyes as well.


However, his clear and sincere regret of his actions, palpable compassion, and his attempts to compensate at some degree the damage that he inflicted to my eyes, undoubtedly point that he was forced to do what he did by some menacing order (which he could not disobey), or by some very serious regalement of the governmental and private medical care policy. This, however, did not diminish and did not excuse his guilt.


15 Aug. 2017 (Tuesday).

At 9.30, I came to Clark Radiology (rue Cote des Neiges), to pass the abdominal-pelvic ultrasound. However, they demanded the original requisition from Dr. El-Hakim, not satisfied by the copy sent by fax.

So, the test was rescheduled for 21 Aug. 2017.


21 Aug. 2017

13.00 - Ultrasound at Clark Radiology.


22 Aug 2017

Friends from abroad, my creative works admirers, sent me money for additional medications and natural remedies, and 1 bottle of Can C eye drops, which could (in very rare occasions) to slow down the advance of the traumatic cataracts, generated by eyes injuries like the laser iridothomy operation. 2 other bottles bought for me my younger daughter, and now, receiving some help from the overseas, I could compensate my daughter's expenses.


Today, I opened a new bottle (2-nd) of Can C eye drops.


In August-October, 2017, my friends sent me few new sums of money through the Western Union; however, none of the checks reached the destination.


All donations have disappeared, or were confiscated by the Canadian government.


A very informed person from Ottawa, with whom I communicated through one of my friends, whispered that - from now on - the Trudeau government was forced by its British and other masters to confiscate any donations to persons considered the ideological opponents of the secret ideological doctrine of the clique standing behind the neo-Liberal cabal. This secret doctrine has reshaped the new political doctrine of this tyrannical "Harper-style" policy. While the former late feudal and capitalist principles dictated the immunity and inviolability of personal and corporate wealth, real estate, property, and bank accounts of citizens, even if they are not loyal to the ruling party and party's leaders, this new doctrine previsioned the violation of the financial and property rights. If, for example, considerable sums of money would be collected to support anti-neo-Liberal manifestations in the biggest cities, the Trudeau government was ready to freeze personal bank accounts, to confiscate any amounts of money or any property, like did the Bolsheviks in the revolutionary Russia in 1910-s - 1920-s.


I was also told (by whisper) that the main locomotive of this new radical policy in Canada is Christia Freeland, who has Ukrainian and Jewish roots and connections. I knew her as a positive and constructive politician, very useful for Canada, and (also according to rumors) not a bad person. I also heard the rumors that many years ago (before becoming a politician) she expressed an opinion that the German Nazism was provoked by the unfair post World War I peace agreement, and by the forcible assimilation or elimination of the ethnic German population on now non-German lands. She, allegedly, also did not dispute that the World War II was provoked by the aggressive, militaristic, and confrontational policy of the British Empire. Such her views and personal qualities - as I understand - are the keys for understanding the approaching Evil, its nature and its roots. If such a (generally - positive) person as Christia Freeland radically changes her natural good personality, openly becoming a vehicle of the most oppressive anti-national tyranny (another very informed person called her in January 2018 a "Canadian Goebbels"): this means something extraordinary, as an approaching coup d'état, or already planned in advance (by the British Empire) big war.


If so, it can be a menace to the very existence of human race, and, first of all, we will be threatened by the evil medical experiments, secret artificial biological tools to turn humans into slaves and robots, and by the medical atrocities, when the medical domain will be used according to the motto "not to heal, but to kill".


23 Aug. 2017

8.00 - an emergency visit to Metro-Medic with urine test culture result Streptococci, and the perenium ulcerous dermatitis, probably, also worsened by the Streptococci.


A new recurrence of the UT infection soon after 2 urological operations could psychologically destroy a person with less sad experience than me; so, no wonder that still remained remnants of the depression have activated again.


This occurrence was perceived not only my me alone, but also by my close ones and by 2 of doctors, who became for me like friends, almost as a disaster.


On the other hand, a sudden Streptococci UT infection, which nothing provoked or triggered, had caused a number of suspicions, forcing to look retrospectively at the initial UT infection back in 2001 from a different perspective. In my former analysis of the events in 1999 - 2001, when Canadian Federal Immigration Medical Services department has committed a number of very serious crimes against me and my family, some of which could be equated to war crimes (including the falsified diagnosis "tuberculosis", the order to be hospitalized at the Infectious Disease Unit for "tubercular treatment" [enforced by a threat to place me into the Immigration prison if I don't comply], and the stubborn refusal of the Immigration doctors to repel this diagnosis even after the proof of its complete nonsense), I suggested that the IMS and other Immigration's bureaucrats could deliberately provoke the UT infection by weakening my immune system and by the psychological suggestive technique (threatening to punish me by a urological infection [see books 1 and 2 of this work]). However, in the light of today's new UTI sudden recurrence against the background of the absence of any of the former urological problem, a justified suggestion that now and by then (in 2001) I was merely artificially infected on the order of the authorities is not looking weird anymore.


The intensified (in August, 2017) police intimidation, all kind of provocations and threats, the confiscation of the donations - sent to me from West Europe (from the admirers of my musical and literary creative works), - and the avalanche of different health problems: enforce the fairness of such a suggestion. The medical terrorism in action is employed by all governments in every historical crucial turning point.


24 Aug. 2017

From 7.30 to 8.30, I was at Verdun Hospital's Laboratory to pass a blood-urine test (on requisitions by Dr. El-Hakim, and Dr. Zhang (from Metro-Medic).


29 Aug. 2017

Since 10.30 - an emergency visit to Dr. El-Hakim.

I found him in a worse health situation than before. He was pale, looked very sick, and was sitting with a shine of a doomed person in his eyes.

I was very worried about his fate, and felt deep sorrow for his destiny. So, I asked nothing about his own health condition, and did not ask much for myself, too.

However, remembering about my former complains about the acute dermatitis and other skin problems, Dr. El-Hakim - by his own initiative - gave me a referral to a dermatologist, Dr. M. Michael Singer.

This, probably, was one of my last visits to Dr. El-Hakim. After 2 or 3 next visits, I did not see him any more.


CHAPTER 3. September-October 2017.


SEPTEMBER 2017


6 Sept. 2017

From 9.45 to 11.10: an emergency visit to Dr. Rohan, my family doctor.

Under suspicious circumstances, I received an injury of my right index finger (a deep (but very small) cut of its tip). Judging by the immediate infection, the cutting surface was poisoned. The whole r. index finger became red, infected, swollen, and unbearably painful.

The joints of 2 external phalanges were also infected and painful.

My visits to Metro-Medic and La Cite walk-in clinics (in my opinion, best in Montreal downtown) brought no positive results. I was systematically directed to 2 same doctors (1 in Metro-Medic and 1 in La Cite), who, being an exclusion among other doctors of these clinics with very humanitarian doctors and personnel, sabotaged any medical help concerning the injury and followed near-gangrene dangerous worsening.

Only my own "home remedies'" methods saved my finger from a gangrene.

However, the post-traumatic degradation and the affected bones and joints still demanded a medical intervention, and this manifested an additional reason of the emergency visit to my family doctor.

Another still acute problem was the pirenial dermatitis with ulcerations and inflammation, which tormented me during few months. (Running forward: when the new gastroenterologist, also an excellent doctor and a decent person, empirically prescribed special antibiotics, this problem has disappeared for years).


6 and 7 Sep. 2017

A rapid and major cataract advance, in addition to other health problems, tragically accompanied the general degradation of the quality of life for me.

The cataract beginning right after the laser iridothomy surgery and its rapid advance from May 2017 till 8 Sep. 2017: is clearly point to iridothomy as to the source and the trigger of the cataract appearance. Moreover, the reverse of the cataract and improvement of my vision (running forward) after 2019 - first, in some short periods of time, and, then, for the periods of several months, - indicate additionally that the cataract was caused by the laser iridothomy.


7 September 2017

At 9.10, I already was at the Brunswick Medical Center (955 St.-Jean boul. (near boul. Brunswick), 2-nd Floor, in Point-Clear. (Tel.: 461-3929, Fax: 514-4590242.)


Instead of Dr. Michael Singer, I was assessed by Dr. Viviott.


I showed her a red spot on my lip, and she said - it was herpes.


No one in my environment had herpes. In addition, I am fanatically follow all the sanitary precautions, never touching anything in public spaces and on public transportation, and washing hands immediately after coming home. Again, in addition, during this period of time, I moved inside Montreal mostly by car. And, the last thing: I still have a normal immune system.


So, a sudden and inexplicable herpes infection raises even more questions.


8 September 2017

The appointment (at 8.30) with Dr. El-Hakim was cancelled in advance by his secretary. She told that he is very sick. It might indicate that he did not work at all, or that he, being ill, accepted only his most critical patients.

When Dr. El-Hakim's secretary contacted me by phone, I asked her if I can (considering the ethical reasons) use his unused old blood-urine requisition (unused - because I received a similar requisition from my family doctor). She told me that she sees no problem. Then I asked her if I can add the microbiology culture and sensitivity into the requisition by hand. She answered that she will call me back. In 2 hours, she called me back, giving me a green light to do so. Probably, she contacted Dr. El-Hakim (or simply asked him, if he worked this day), or asked his fellow colleague.

So, today, on 8 Sept. 2017 (arriving at 7:10), I paid an emergency visit to Notre-Dame Hospital's Laboratory.


Police cars watched me closely near Notre-Dame Hospital, and, in the hospital, a patient in the line (he was staying before me (leather jacket, 56 y.o., slightly shorter than me), followed me everywhere, and a technician - that moved the chariot - was looking for me everywhere I went...


After the blood test - it appeared a terrible, enormously huge hematoma-like hardening,

consolidation, swelling.


The bladder pain has meanwhile dramatically increased, especially when voiding....


10 September 2017 - 23 Sep. 2017

A massive and fundamental cataract improvement occurred: hallos and auras almost disappeared, vision sharpness restored (20x20 - home check), clearness restored - traces of improvement lasted till 25 Sep 2017.


19 September 2017

An appointment was scheduled with Dr. Saheb at 14:00.

McGill Eye Clinic at the new location of the Royal Victoria Hospital sabotaged the appointment with Dr. Saheb, informing me that I could get an appointment with him only in 2-3 years - in 2020! They openly mocked at me, because no patient faced such a delay, especially taking into consideration my emergency situation.

A visit to Dr. Saheb (to accelerate the appointment, seeing him in his private office) for $175, was also not a solution.

Naturally, this was not for a welfare recipient like me, who don't work under the table, has no additional income, and lives not in a social housing apartment.

So, I had no choices but to cancel this appointment.


20 September 2017

I opened a new bottle of Can-C.


21 September 2017

The right index finger's complications continue to torment me, and forced me to pay an emergency visit to Metro-Medic (7.00 - 10.30).


I was directed - again - to Dr. Guy, the most desensitized and indifferent doctor in the clinic.


However, during my 3-rd visit to Dr. Guy, I, at least, received a requisition for an X-Ray, at the VM-Medic radiology in the same building.

The urgent radiologist's report contained "no abnormalities" verdict, which was, obviously a fake. Probably, some Metro-Medic's doctors have a possibility to put the whole clinic, or some of their fellows-radiologists under a pressure, forcing to them to produce not correct reports.


In spite of my statement that the serious damage to my rights index finger was caused by an injury, Dr. Guy said - this is "arthritis, but small", and denied anti-inflammatory, a referral to a traumatic surgeon, etc.


He prescribed nothing, scheduled no follow-ups, and gave no recommendations.


23 Sept. 2017

A possible eyes' chemical burn by Voltaren occurred: probably, I unconsciously rubbed my eyes at night while sleeping, after applying Voltaren to the right index finger.

At my wakeup time both eyes were wildly burning.


I am afraid that this possible burn (or, if there was no chemical burn by Voltaren, some other reasons have caused this burning sensation) - boosted cataract's new speeded advance again [meantime: 3-rd half bottle of N-Acetylcysteine (NAC), N-Acety-l-Carnosine) was used by this moment...]


26 Sept. 2017

Scheduled at 9.15 appointment with Dr. Szego actually took place at 16.20. I waited near 7 hours in the waiting room with no space and no chairs for all patients!


The authorities and their masters deliberately made the existence of ordinary people miserable, evoking the feudal order and feudal privileges of the ruling class against the background of the full lawlessness for the oppressed plebeians.


No wonder that - with all his human approach - Dr. Sczego could not do much for me.


After doctor's digital exam - wild pain, like a wound or scar inside...


Next 2 days - internal + external ulcers (eventually started before 26 sept., inside, as a ulcerous colitis).


29 Sept 2017

No wonder that Friday, 29 September, I came at 9.00 to my family doctor, Dr. Rohan, with the same problems:


a) wild pain, inflammation, swelling, and deformation of the right index finger;

b) suspected colitis and, connected to almost obvious intestinal infection, external dermatitis, inflammation, and ulceration;

c) unsolved new urological problems, accompanied by the fact of completely blocked for me urological care;

d) and other ignored and neglected by doctors health problems, some of which have a very simple solution.


Once again, my frequent visits to medical institutions are provoked by the blatant ignorance of my health problems by medics, which resulted in aggravations, complications, and worsening of my health situation. Not less than 80 percent of my visits to doctors and medical institutions are cause by the failure by the system to provide at least a very basic, elementary medical help.


This time, Dr. Rohan did everything possible to provide such medical help, but his efforts were (again) sabotaged of the next level of medical care (running forward).


He also signed a requisition for a stool test, and gave several very valuable advises how to treat myself. Normally, doctors avoid to give such specific advises to their patients, with the concrete methodic and remedies' recipes.


OCTOBER 2017


2 Oct 2017

I took the test sample (on Dr. Rohan's requisition) to St.-Mary's Lab, and, later, came to Royal Victoria Hospital's Clinic to put myself on the waiting list for Dr. Szego, and (also) obtained the bottles for a similar test from Royal Vic. Lab.

[This notice in my "medical" diary from 2017 is raising some questions. Were these 2 tests exactly similar, or similar only formally, by the sample's category, but dedicated for different testing examination? Once (only 1 time in my patient's practice) I used 2 similar requisitions from 2 different doctors, for passing an equal test in 2 different hospitals' labs on the same day, in the same morning: to see if one of the test will be sabotaged. (See in one of the previous parts of this work - what happened). Was I planning a similar checking in October 2017?]


2-3 Oct. 2017

The continued worsening of vision is becoming a greater and greater problem.


3 Oct. 2017

I took the test's sample to Royal Vic. Hosp. Lab (on Dr. Szego's requisition).


Same day, I walked back home from St.-Mary's, and, than, from Royal Victoria's Hospital, around 7 km. It was a very windy day, and I got a follicular quinsy.


I did not notice and did not feel any flue-related symptoms, just the red throat (I looked at the mirror) and wild pain in the throat, as if it was a wound there.


4 Oct. 2017

I visited Dr. Rohan, looking for a copy of blood-stool test result. However, the result did not arrive to doctor's office, and was "not in the system". Theoretically, it was possible that the result is not ready yet, in 2 days, but a preliminary summary was also absent from the system. So, having a very bad experience with the medical labs, I started to become worried.


This is why I visited the Medical Archive at St.-Mary's Hospital, filled in - and signed - the form for the summary of hospital records for May 2016 - Oct. 2017.


5 Oct. 2017

My visit to Dr. Schultz (the new rheumatologist) had produced a particular diagnosis: 1-st time in 16 years of my suffering from the arthritis. My innumerous visits to different doctors (including my family doctor; 2 previous rheumatologists; and 1 osteopath) did not bring any results in term of an exact true diagnosis. All doctors (in exemption of Dr. Khananian, who, at least, assumed a diagnosis, but did not officially confirm it) kept silence, avoiding naming any exact verdict about the particular nature of my arthritis. Dr. Jan Schultz was a 1-st doctor, who said - this is osteoporosis, the 1-st stage, and proposed the cortisone injections.


I declined his offer of the cortisone injections, because this is the last resort, which can be used for managing such a problem.


Dr. Schultz, unlike other doctors, respected my decision, and prescribed 2 alternative medications. This is a very human approach, and I believe that Dr. Schultz is one of the last humanists in the medical profession, who is really worried about the well-being of his patients, having a true compassion.


5 Oct. 2017

The follicular quinsy advanced.


I could not sleep; was sweating; had the painful throat, a suffocation sensation; could not breathe normally and swallow.


The neck's lymphatic nodules became affected.


6 Oct. 2017

I visited Dr. Rohan and obtained the copy of blood-stool test result.

The result was the best ("no abnormal(s)") in 5 or 10 years. Could be a fake.


Dr. Rohan examined my throat 2 times - and said that he seas "nothing".


When I told him that I have a follicular quinsy, and asked for local antibiotic prescription, or, alternatively, local topical treatment course: he rejected both my self-diagnosis and the treatment.


The complications of this untreated follicular quinsy were devastating for my health in next 3-4 years, causing a number of health problems.


My "home remedies" did not help, in particular that - in this period - we were facing especially harsh financial difficulties, and I could not buy the ingredients for the most efficient home-made remedies.


9 Oct. 2017

This is the 1-st day of small improvements after 3 days of the terrible quinsy (wild throat pain on the left, sweeting, etc.)


At night, from 9 to 10 Oct. 2017, my grand-daughter was born.


15 Oct. 2017

The complications after the follicular quinsy are annoying: weakness, lack of energy, etc. Painful throat again.


14-16 October 2017

A good (short) vision improvement followed a period of worsening.


16-17 Oct. 2017

I forgot to renew the eye drops in time (which control the intraocular eye pressure); and did not have drops for night from 16 to 17 October.


17 Oct 2017, at 8.40 I came to the pharmacy to renew the drops.


The police car 15-13 on my way back home was demonstratively watching me.


Over night - vision worsening happened.


18 Oct. 2017

In the evening, the attempts to restore my wife's erased photos from her cellphone, made my eyes very tired. After those efforts, the vision has dramatically declined.


19 Oct. 2017

At 12.15 - I sent a fax to Royal Vic. Hosp. Med. Archive, demanding the copies of the tests results in October.


Meanwhile, the vision did not restore.


Everything is blurry - as in a fog, and the optical aberrations doubled.


20 Oct. 2017

I had to visit Dr. Rohan (at 9.00) again, because the drama with my right index finger continued; the "gastric" external dermatitis still torments me; the complications of the follicular quinsy and throat pain continues; and so on.


However, my family doctor proposed no medical solutions for my health problems, but, in the same time, gave me very valuable and effective in practice advices. He spent with me not less than 30 minutes, lecturing and explaining.


26 Oct. 2017

I had an appointment with Dr. Wang at 9.00.

A series of new dermatological problems required specialist's help.

For 2 mirror lesions, she said that they are benign, and don't need any treatment.

This phenomenon has appeared in 2 days (!) on both left and right arms, not just in the similar (same!) areas, but literary at the same distance (in centimeters) from the middle finger.

Moreover, these 2 lesions were absolutely identical by form and by size.

When I, using a pen and a piece of a transparent paper, made an exact shape model of the lesion on my right hand (I am able to use my left hand almost as efficient as my right hand), placing it at the lesion of the left hand, it was as a "copy-paste" identical shape.

On my inquiry, Dr. Wang responded that this is a "seborrhea keratosis", but her tone gave her out, indicating that this time (1-st time in many years) she is not sure.

Dr. Wang did not prescribe the desired medications; however, she spent with me not less than 20 minutes, explaining - how to cope with my sores by "home remedies", and how to prepare these remedies.


CHAPTER 4. November-December 2017.


NOVEMBER 2017


7 Nov. 2017

I managed to obtain a new appointment with Dr. Beatrice Wang (at 9.40).

Because "home remedies" helped very little, Dr. Wang prescribed Hydrocortisone (a correct type).

She also removed (described about) 2 phenomenal (it not mysterious) mirror lesions on my left and right hands.


20 Nov. 2017

At 8.30, I had an appointment with Dr. Saheb.

He was not just an excellent doctor-specialist, but a decent man.

More details about his offers and his methods of managing my vision degradation are given in the special series "Who Destroyed My Vision and Hearing" (see the previous books).


26 Nov. 2017

Another appointment with Dr. Wang.

She checked the affected skin, left by 7 November mini-surgery, and said that everything is OK.


27 Nov. 2017

At 14.15, I had to be seen by Dr. Wang, but her secretaries changed the date of the appointment, rescheduling it to 26 Oct.


DECEMBER 2017


4 Dec. 2017

It was not a mistake, when I evaluated the situation with the improved treatment at medical institutions - after 2 urological surgeries - as a turning point.

Indeed, after the major crises, when the System and Dr. Morris almost killed me, the System has changed its policy towards me.

Moreover, to compensate all innumerous medical crimes, committed against me, the System allowed me to have the most frequent appointment with general doctors and doctors-specialists, and to have all medically necessary tests and exams.

And, because I stayed - as a patient - EXCLUSIVELY with the most human and compassionate doctors, who are, simultaneously, the best experts in the medical field, I was - temporarily (for a short time only) facing human approach and compassionate care, which the most of the ordinary unprivileged patients never receive.

However, despite this drastic improvement, even during this period of time, the sabotage has continued on the level of some casual doctors from walk-in clinics, medical laboratories and radiologies.

In spite of all the positive changes in System's treatment, MOST of my health problems (and, sometimes, the most serious of them) were still ignored and not addressed, or were treated inadequately.

The follicular quinsy (see above); the ordeal with the injury of my right index finger (see above); and some other problems were ignored, or not treated adequately. And, because the most human doctors, whom I know for years, instead of medical prescriptions, have provided me with the exclusive information-studies of the alternative self-treatment, as if I was a medical university student, this indicated that the doctors were restricted by the authorities in providing medical help.


Today, 4 Dec. 2017 (Monday), I was assessed by Dr. Schulz (the rheumatologist): the appointment was scheduled at 11.00.


Dr. Schultz, unlike other doctors, recognized the seriousness of the right index finger post-injury situation, and prescribed a very rare ointment, or proposed - alternatively - the cortisone injections.


20 Dec. 2017

At 8.45, I had an appointment with Dr. Sageb, for an exam of retina and macula, with the dilation. However, this appointment was cancelled.


In general, the Royal Victoria's Eye Clinic started to sabotage my appointments with Dr. Saheb. For example, when he said that wants to see me in 2 months, the registration nurses-secretaries used to refuse an appointment, when I was returning my charter, saying that they will call me in 2-3 weeks. However, months passed, and nobody contacted me, and, when I came to the clinic - they denied an appointment anyway. Each time only a personal intervention of Dr. Saheb helped me to receive an appointment with him.


CHAPTER 5. January-May 2018.


JANUARY 2018


4 January 2018

Since January 2, 2018, I had pain in the left eye, and, worrying about a possibility of a catastrophic IOP, I contacted both Dr. Gans and Dr. Saheb, but booking an appointment with one of them was impossible.


Then, I contacted several optometrists, but, by the reason of New Year, or by another reasons, I could not get any rendezvous.


So, I called the office of Dr. Rheum, and spoke with 2 of the secretaries, who, after hearing my family name, aggressively and angrily, said that any appointment with Dr. Rheum is forbidden for me. Formally, they did not say openly that I am on a black list, but used a pretext that, allegedly, they are not allowed to register an appointment with welfare recipients. I told them that this is nonsense, and that this is a discriminatory and a criminal demarche, which can be punished by the Canadian law, but both of them just mocked at me, completely ignoring my words.


5 January 2018

Since Jan. 5, 2018: acute dermatological problems: folliculitis, eczemas, lesions,

etc.


Jan. 6 - Feb. 2 2018

A new wave of the acute perineal dermatitis literarily forced me to lay or to stay, without the ability to seat.


No solutions from doctors for 1 and a half years made my situation hopeless, despite the fact that a simple course of antibiotics could put an and of my torments.


FEBRUARY 2018


5 Feb. 2018, Lundi (Monday)

On February 5, at 13.20, I should have a first appointment with a new gastroenterologist, Dr. Poliquen, since Dr. Szego is retiring soon. The appointment was scheduled for 13.20.


However, his secretary cancelled the appointment, and rescheduled it to 16 April 2018.


8 Feb. 2018, Thursday

A glaucoma attack started yesterday, 7 Feb. 2018.

My sad experience of being cut from any ophthalmological help during previous glaucoma attacks dictated turning for help into a French hospital, because both English St.-Mary's and Royal Victoria's Eye Clinics made me - certainly - a persona non grata.


Feb. 10, 2018, Sat.

From 14.00 to 20.30 - I was in the emergency department of Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital. The IOP was above the maximally excepted level (20): 25-24, with all the dangers of being completely blinded by glaucoma.


(See the details in the series "Who Destroyed My Vision and Hearing").


12 Feb 2018

Again, I spent many hours at the Emergency of Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital with the continuing glaucoma attack.


(See the details in the series "Who Destroyed My Vision and Hearing").


19 Feb. 2018, Lundi (Monday)

Only on 19 Feb. I got to an ophthalmologist, glaucoma specialist, Dr. Tassot, at Hopital Maisonneuve-Rosemont (at 10:15). Intraocular Pressure: Assistant Office: OS - 20, OD - 17. Doctor's Office: OS 21, OD - 18.


(See the details in the series "Who Destroyed My Vision and Hearing").


27 Feb. 2018, Thursday

My appointment with Dr. Schultz was rescheduled at 14.45, instead of 9.00. My appointments at 9.00 and 11.00 (arranged so to enable me to be the 1-st or the last patient, due to my inability to seat in the waiting room) were cancelled by one of the front desk secretaries. When I heard the message (left on the answering machine), I called back, and cancelled the appointment: because of (sometimes) long waiting time, I could not stay so long as was not able to seat due to the perineal dermatitis.


MARCH 2018


1 March 2018

On March 1, 2018, I was by Dr. Tenzer at 10.00. Now, with no financial resources for dental treatment, I had no other options, but to pull out almost healthy teeth, with the help of Dr. Tenzer, because was tortured and mistreated by the professional specialized dental clinic of Dr. Saleh.


2 March 2018

I had a dizziness at night, from 1-st to 2-nd of March, which was, then, during next days - increasing.


3 - 11 March 2018

From time to time, waves of momentary dizziness (few second) were attacking me, becoming much stronger when I was lying down on the left side. A 6 sec. delay between lying down on the left side - and the beginning of such dizziness.


7 March 2018

I had another appointment with Dr. Tenzer at 11.30 today.


13 March, 2018, Tuesday

When I came to see Dr. Szego (the appointment was planned at 9.00, but I waited many hours again), he told me again that he's retires, and gave me an advice to find another specialist-gastroenterologist.

He also hinted that does not trust the authentic nature of my tests' results, and, therefore, cannot prescribe medications to treat the perineal dermatitis. However, he prescribed a new cream, which could fight this problem locally.


15 March, 2018, Thursday

I came to Dr. Tenzer at 9.45.


16-18 March 2018

Since 16 March 2018, a strong headache, accompanied by eyes pain, did not ease even for a minute (a new glaucoma attack?)


22 March 2018, Thursday

In spite of the strong headache, I had to appear at Dr. Tenzer's office at 9.00.

He treated 2 teeth, without treating the canal (because this procedure is devilishly expensive). Formally, he is violating the medical protocol, but, from the humanitarian point of view, it is better to prolong the life of a tooth even without the canal treatment - than to extract this tooth 5-10 years earlier.


24 March 2018, Saturday

My wife gave me a lift, driving me for the appointment at New Royal Victoria Hospital, for left wrist's Ultrasound (room C25139; time - 10:10).

Running forward:

This ultrasound found deformations and abnormalities (in the left wrist), neurotically denied by few doctors and medical bureaucrats, who accused me in simulation or hypochondriac "obsession" by "imaginable" health problems, questioning the veracity of my suffering from an unbearable pain.

The bizarre provocation at the Montreal General Hospital's Emergency Department, described in this work, was based on medics' claim that I, allegedly, came to the hospital with "imaginable" problems. This was refuted by the ultrasound from 24 March 2018.


(See the details in the previous books (parts).


27 March 2018

Strong headache and eyes' pain continues.


28 March 2018

Strong headache, blood pressure (at 9.00) 145 x 81, pulse 91.


29 March 2018, Thursday

Dr. Tenzer at 14.00.


APRiL 2018


9 Apr. 2018, Monday

Because of the unsolved dermatological problems, I had to visit Dr. Wang again (the appointment was scheduled at 15.45).


12 Apr. 2018, Thursday

At 14.00, it was an appointment with Dr. Tenzer. The 1-st lower right molder was extracted with devastating results: swelling and pain did not stop during 5 days, which I attributed to a bad drainage and damage to the alveolar bone.

Pain was decreasing in the following days, but the problems, connected to the alveolar bone and the gum damage just increased.


16 Apr. 2018, Monday

An appointment (scheduled for 14.40) with Dr. Poliquin (the gastroenterologist) met all my expectations.

He appeared to be a true doctor, faithful to the humanitarian mission of his profession, true to the Hippocratic Oath, and compassionately concerned about human suffering. Besides, he, as it looked to me, was a very good specialist.

Dr. Poliquin worked in a small health center at 7715 Boul Newman (near Lapierre), Lasalle Qc (fax: 514-3630492 - phone: (514) 363-6638).

Normally, the waiting time is reduced in such small medical facilities, but (contrary to the norm) I waited almost 4 hours, being admitted at doctor's office only at 18.30.

The doctor and his 2 secretaries (very nice friendly women) did a comprehensive preparatory job, extracting several pages of tests and analyses from the database. Besides, Dr. Poliquin, on my request, searched the archive of the Royal Victoria Hospital, but, unfortunately, without any result.

Yes, he found the mentioning of the endoscopy and colonoscopy, but there were no reports or other medical documents related to these exams.

In the database, it was also mentioned about 1 test for parasites, administrated by Dr. Szego, but no traces of related report were found.

When he looked at (provided by me) paper copies of non-full (with missing pages) colonoscopy report, and a paper, which proven that I really passed an endoscopy, he had to admit that 2 colonoscopy results, 1 endoscopy results, and 1 test for parasites really completely disappeared from the Royal Victoria Hospital's database.

Dr. Poliquin renewed some of Dr. Szego's prescriptions, and administrated new tests for parasites and other pathologies.


However, the tests that he administrated completely vanished all together, with no traces.


Here (see below) - is the requisition of one of these tests, with stamps and marks made by the laboratory staff (the confidential information is removed purposefully). Here is striking a non-matching of the date of the prescription by the doctor - and the date on the lab stamp. The requisition was issued in April 2018, but the stamp is displaying the date of November 2019. I went with the requisition to the lab in April 2018, so, this is already a sign of a scam or provocation. (See below)


17 Apr. 2018

When I passed a blood test at Verdun Hospital's Lab (before 8.20), I felt an intensive heart battery and heart pain.

An aggressive and intimidating police-security surveillance after this test was the 1-st such demarche after 2 urological surgeries.

Waiting in the line for my turn to pass the test, I noticed a disturbing indication of HIV component in the requisition for this blood test.


19 Apr. 2018, Thursday

Only in the middle of April, I, finally, received an appointment with a permanent ophthalmologist at Hopital Maisonneuve-Rosemont's Eye Clinic. The non-stop glaucoma attack and the vision worsening lasted since January 2018, but only 2 months later I was allowed to a doctor. If the circumstances were unluckier, the consequences could be catastrophic for my vision.

I met Dr. Mark Lesk after waiting 8 (!!!) hours in the waiting room (my appointment was scheduled at 7.50).

I realized right away that Dr. Mark Lesk is an Israeli citizen. It does not matter for me, because I am not a chauvinist, racist, or prejudice bearer. In general, Dr. Lesk appeared to be an ethical and compassionate doctor, and a good specialist. He is not able (in my opinion) to do any harm to any patient, for any political or another reason. For a person like me, it is a good luck to become a patient of such a moral doctor.

However, the choice of the next clinic to choose for me doctors, connected to a particular entity - is very frightening in itself.

Difficulties with Dr. Lesk arose later, when the System started to squeeze me, denying appointments and medical help in the midst of the most worse acute glaucoma attacks and intraocular bleedings. Unlike Dr. Saheb, who personally intervened few times, booking appointments for me, Dr. Lesk, on the contrary, has excused and justified the System, giving up to the authorities. And, still (running forward), he turned to be the best person among more than more than a dozen of ophthalmologists, with whom I had to deal.

Dr. Lesk, according to hospital's card is an "Ophtalmologue, specialiste de Glaucome".


26 Apr. 2018

I had an appointment with Dr. Tenzer at 14.00, but had to cancel it.

Dr. Tenzer's secretary (this time, it was not a member of his family, but another person) rescheduled it to 1 May 2018, the International Workers' Day.

My intuition was screaming that this rescheduling will bring a considerable misfortune. I could not explain, why my intuition should prompt a frightening danger. However, the circumstances did not allow me to go to Dr. Tenzer on April 26, 2018. And doctor's secretary did not have (or just claimed that don't have) another free window.


MAY 2018


1 May 2018

The appointment with Dr. Tenzer for 2-nd right low molder extraction was planned at 13.30.

My younger daughter drove me to this appointment, accompanying me.

She refused to go up to Dr. Tenzer's office, and, instead, went to the downstairs café to work there on her doctorate in psychology. She never explained, why she feels such a strong antipathy to Dr. Tenzer that does not want to see him.

Later, I was sure that, if she would go with me to Dr. Tenzer's office, the disaster would not happen.

The 2-nd low right molder (tooth) was extracted with enormous difficulties, and with the disastrous complications. The right side of the jaw was, definitely, damage or even fractured; 2 alveolar bones (minimum) were broken; and a considerable damage was done to gum's soft tissue.

I am not in a position to judge about Dr. Tenzer's negligent or medical error. I just feel and see that something bizarre happened, because, in general, Dr. Tenzer is a very good dentist and an adequate dental surgeon. So, either it was a rare and tragic misfortune, or another act of medical terrorism, prepared and executed by the authorities with the help of someone of Dr. Tenzer's assistants.

At 15.20, one of my daughters called Dr. Tenzer's office (on my request; I could not speak at this time, communicating with my family members mostly by gestures), and asked for an emergency appointment, due to the catastrophic consequences of the dental extraction operation.


2 May 2018

Dr. Tenzer personally called back, and - somehow (speaking with great difficulties) I explained him the situation.

He told that can see me tomorrow, at noon.

It took me aback, because - in the past - Dr. Tenzer invited me IMMEDIATELY in case of any urgency. Besides, considering the gravity of the situation, he should see me today, Wednesday, May 2, 2018, not tomorrow.

Consequently, something really wild could be detected not only in the devastating consequences of the tooth extraction, but in the radically changed behavior of Dr. Tenzer.


3 May 2018

An emergency visit to Dr. Tenzer (12:00).

X-Ray, CAD scan, and antibiotics, were denied.

Local anti-inflammatory applied, with no help.

This surprised me even more.

Never before Dr. Tenzer denied his responsibility or accountability in case of any complications after his treatment.

Like Dr. El-Hakim, he used to tell always: "OK, it can be just an unlucky combination of circumstances, but, as a doctor, I should prevision it, so, I carry the full responsibility".

Something really weird is going on.

After Dr. Tenzer's today's refusal of X-Ray-CAD, and other measures, I decided not to go anymore to him anyways.


4 May 2018

An emergency visit to Dr. Tran (14.00), in Outremont.


Her medical judgement (after CAD-X-Ray) was the next:

a peace of the jaw was broken out by Dr. Tenzer;

2 or 3 alveolar bones are affected (broken? fractured?).


She said that a wide and complicated surgery is needed; but, as she underlined, not only the complexity of such a surgery is risky, but the period of the recovery will be very extended.


The healing will take many months; I'll have to weary a special support; I'll not be able to speak during a long period of time; and the complete period of recovery may last around 1 year.


However, without the surgery, she said, the recovery will last degrees shorter, and the risks smaller. The negative consequences of this option is that 1) my diction may be affected forever; 2) some negative factors may affect my hearing; 3) when I lose most of the teeth, it will be impossible to weary the denture prostheses.


In reality, the choices have presented only theoretically, because such a dental surgical operation would cost tenth or even hundreds of thousands of dollars. And, as justice and fairness for such underprivileged people as I am - don't exists in Canada, and I'll be never compensated for my suffering and for my injuries, inflicted by the caste medical system, such a surgery will be inaccessible for me. Even if - in a fantastic dream - I would be granted such an option: it would be imprudent and risky to fling on mercy of this caste medical system, giving myself into the hands of the vindictive doctors, who may be enraged if I'll would get a court order compensation for a medical error, committed by one of them.


Dr. Tran prescribed erythromycin and novo-profen for an adequate period of time.

However, she refused any official document of her conclusions and the antecedent anamnesis.


11 May 2018

I visited Dr. Tran (the dentist) at 11.30 today.


17 May 2018

15.00 - Dr. Tran, the dentist.


18 May 2018

11.30 - Dr. Tran, the dentist.


I also received an appointment for May 17, 15.00.


17 May 2018

15:00 - Dr. Tran, the dentist.


This new dental ordeal is the best illustration - how the discriminative and socially segregatable medical system and one doctor's medical error provoke innumerous visits to doctors and a long-lasted need in medical help. And, still, the consequences are most often irreversible, and the financial and systemic damage to public health care is devastating.


The complete impunity of medical workers in Canada is triggering an avalanche effect, demolishing the very basic foundation of Canadian society and Canada's public medical system. If, in the case of Dr. Tenzer, it was, as I believe, just a medical error, or an intervention of some external sinister forces, in a number of other cases, other doctors have committed the deliberate damage to my health and my physical and mental integrity, and, still, stayed non-accountable.


31 May 2018

Dr. Schultz, at 9.15.


He refused Naproxen, and prescribed Celebrex.


Still, I believe that Dr. Schultz was motivated by providing the most beneficial and harmless treatment for his patients, because - after 63 - medications like Naproxen can bring some cardiovascular complications and trigger the raise of the blood pressure. However, it could be equally possible that the government's policy simply forcing doctors to reduce Naproxen prescription, irrelatively of the concerns and each personal case.


But the most speaking evidence of Dr. Schultz's ethical approach is that he did not denied me the anti-inflammatory completely, prescribing, at least, Celebrex, instead of Naproxen.


The same day, I went out (at 13.43) with the photo-camera, but forgot the eyeglasses, and did not return home, taking photos via the viewfinder (looking with the left eye), in the sun.


When I walked opposite to the Chapito place (near rue Seigniors) - on the opposite side of the canal a man in a white shirt (like a worker of the site) was wearing a strange optical or scanning device with several tubes and "eyes". (It was hanging on a rope from his neck). The device had a screen on the small edge (the man was looking down to see the screen).


Even before coming home I already had a headache, and pain in the left eye, which became red.


I had small dizziness, and nausea for 2 or 3 hours.


Everything points to a new glaucoma attack with an elevated intraocular pressure.


CHAPTER 6. June-December 2017


JUNE 2018


6 June 2018, Wednesday

In spite of Dr. Tran's warnings, I decided to find a way for obtaining an access to a complicated dental operation, but, for this, I had to obtain a medical document confirming the traumas, caused by Dr. Dao's and Dr. Tenzer's damaging teeth extraction procedures.


One acquaintance has advised to turn to Dr. Chadi Taoutel, who has his dental clinic on Sherbrook Street (1600 Sherbrook W., 514-521-1434). The goal of my visit to this dentist was to hear an alternative opinion, and to try to obtain an official document concerning my dental injuries.


I came to see Dr. Taoutel at 15.30.


For a short exam, he charged me with a considerable (for us) sum of money, but refused CAD and other - related to a proper diagnostic - procedures.


It was absolutely clear that he does not want to issue any medical certificate, which could affect any of his colleague. He aggressively and insistently demanded the name of a dentist, who inflicted all my dental injuries, ignoring my replies that "it is does not matter". It must be taken into consideration that I did not tell anything about a medical error or about complications from a dental surgery. In other words, I did not tell - what caused the damage to my jaw, gums, alveolar bones, etc.


I told - in response to his investigation - that I came just for the assessment of my dental problems and plan for their solutions. But Dr. Taoutel perfectly saw that a number of serious dental injuries were inflicted by a dental operation, i.e. by one or two of his colleagues.


So, this dishonest and unfair dentist not only refused a medical summary of my dental injuries (even if I did not complain about any dentist), but also refused to do his duty.


JULY 2018


18-19 July 2018

Today, I found myself under another possible microwave radiation attack, but not of the maximum intensity - as 3 major previous similar attacks, - only partially harmless and more delicately regulated.


After a momentary dizziness (again, when I was near the salon big window, closer to the window with left part of my body), I noticed nausea, headache (left side of the head), and left eye pain with sensing a kind of pressure (probably, elevated (above the norm) intraocular pressure.


This triggered a possible new long-lasted glaucoma attack (left eye).


AUGUST 2018


16 Aug. 2018

With great difficulties, bombarding the secretariat by my phone calls, and reporting about the acute glaucoma attack, I managed, finally, to obtain a rendezvous with Dr. Lesk at 9.00 (the whole appointment, with the waiting time, took today relatively less time: I was assessed by doctor at 12.25).


Dr. Lesk said that there is no cataract advance (his words confirmed my suggestion that the cataract was triggered by the iridothomy laser surgery, and was not age-related by nature).


He also said that sees some scratches in both eyes of unknown nature (this new injuries - the scratches - could appear as the result of another attack by a remote microwave weapon on July 18, 2018); blepharitis infection (which was not present till now); and rosacea of the lower eyelids.


Dr. Lesk prescribed additional kind of eye-drops for securing the stable IOP [running forward: this save me from innumerous future glaucoma attacks, and, finally, established a "permanent" remission from glaucoma since the end of 2021], erythromycin, and compresses.


It was very strange that the IOP appeared to be 14. When I measured the IOP at home of one of my acquaintances, who had by then the eye tonometer, it showed 24 in the left eye (15 Aug. 2018).


[See the details in the previous books (parts).]


23 Aug. 2018, Thursday

When I met Daniel (at 11.00), police aggressively and intimidating watched us.

The police car 82-15 was the most demonstratively intimidating in my area.


SEPTEMBER 2018


27 Sep. 2018

When I came to Verdun Hospital for blood-urine test, not only the police were watching me, but also a young white male in eyeglasses (not fat, a "regular" body shape and height), who, besides, was filming me on his camera.


Inside the lab, he pretended to sit into nr. 4 seat, but it was my number on the screen, so, he was sent to the women that always (with no exceptions) served me.


But today I was served by an oriental person.


After the test, there was a considerable hematoma, which never happened when the previous nurse collected blood.


On my way back home: police car 82-15 - again.


28 Sep. 2018

Heart tightness: 2 times during the day (anything of this nature has never happened before).


30 Sep. 2018

The hematoma - left by the blood test at Verdun Hospital - became painful and hard; strong heart beating (tachycardia) and arrhythmia was noticed since yesterday evening.


OCTOBER 2018


1-2 Oct. 2018, Monday

Heart pain.


8 Oct. 2018, Monday

After carrying out a heavy garbage bag, I was experiencing a light headache (left side) + left eye pain at night (passed in the morning (9 Oct.) (no pain any more)


9 Oct. 2018

On my way to Dr. Viviott (the appointment was scheduled for 17.15), to Point-Claire, I was abused and insulted by the bus driver at Dorval's central bus station while taking a transit bus in Dorval.


When I asked if this bus is going to Point-Claire, he said that he does not know what is Point-Claire (an odd, weird response for a bus driver of Dorval-Point-Claire area!), but, when I rephrased my question, asking if this bus is going now along the autoroute "vers Saint-Jean" (to the opposite direction from Montreal) - he nodded.


However, when the bus started his route, I noticed that it is heading towards Montreal.


I pressed the button twice, calling the stop, but the driver ignored it, and did not want to let me getting off the bus, continuing to speed up. We passed 2 bus stops with this bus number marked on them. It means that the bus driver just mocked on me, and that this whole ordeal was not coincidental, but was an organized provocation. I recalled innumerous conflicts - when I used to receive an appointment card with a rendezvous scheduled on a holiday or weekend, or off-work days, or when I was sent an email with a wrong time, etc. This was a similar provocation.


Returning to the preceded facts: before getting on this bus, I came to another one - heading to Point-Claire, - but the bus driver of the "right" bus stopped me in the door asking where I go, and, when I said that I go to Point-Clair, he directed me to this particular ("wrong") bus. Soon, I noticed that another driver replaced the man, who, maybe, just posed as a driver. So, it was a conspiracy of 2 bus drivers already. Because the bus driver kept me inside forcibly, not allowing me to get off the bus, it became clear that he deliberately misinformed me and intentionally plotted this whole ordeal.


If not passengers' intervention (the passengers of the bus, unlike the "most common" public [real flock of sheep], which never intervene), who were enraged by the bus driver's behavior, he would not let me out, and would bring me back to Montreal.


I get off the bus on the 3-rd bus stations, and had to run back to Dorval around 4 km - trying not to be late for my appointment with Dr. Viviott.


On my way back home, I was surrounded by 2 young men who literarily stick to me, to my body. I tried to step aside, but they only pressed harder. Then, when I was sitting on the last back seat, the same 2 guys rushed to seat beside me, and later surrounded me when I was getting off the bus.


Coming home, I noticed that lost Dr. Viviott's prescription, which I needed desperately.


It could happen because of the stress that I experienced on the bus at Dorval, and on the bus back to Montreal: to Côte-Vertu bus station. It is also equally possible that the envelope with the prescription was merely stolen on the bus.


After that ordeal, the left eye pain and heart pain returned, then disappeared.


10 Oct. 2018, Wednesday

The headache (the left side) has returned around midnight.


10 hours after eating a cake (left after grand-daughter's birthday): sore throat, running nose.


11 Oct. 2018

Emergency at Rosemont-Maisonneuve Hospital: I came there with an acute eyes pain and headache (the left part of the head).


In spite of my emergency situation and danger to lose my vision, I was not seen by any doctor in the emergency department, and was just sent home without any medical help, follow ups, ophthalmologic care, or IOP measuring.


Following this next ordeal, I wrote a letter to Dr. Lesk. (For details: see the previous books (parts).


Since the beginning of October, I was experiencing heart tightness, especially when under a physical activity.


NOVEMBER 2018


28 Nov. 2018

Today, I had an appointment with Dr. Lesk (13.40).


See the details in the previous series "Who Destroyed My Vision and Hearing".


29 Nov. 2018

3-rd day of waiting for the diamond delivery.


E. said he will go in person to pick it up.


I was planning to go down the stairs taking the box down, and also took all my medications to the bedroom, but forgot about erythromycin and voltaren. However, he called me while approaching my home and asked not to take the box downstairs, but to wait for him and open the entrance door - letting him in (as if he knew about my intentions). He, definitely, wanted to brag of his new purchase, and to show me the stone.


When he came, he unpacked the box, took out the diamond, for half an hour displaying it close to my eyes, and then went to bathroom.


When he left, pain started to evolve in the left side of my head, and in the left eye. I heard a hiss in my ears, which disappeared for a long period of time, and the blood pressure have jumped to 140 x 95.


In 2 hours, the pain started to become less sensible, and then seemed to ease, and I went to sleep without visiting an emergency room.


I suggest that looking into the shining diamond I provoked an elevated IOP, and it provoked a jump of the blood pressure.


Next day, the pain returned, but I had no opportunity to go to emergency, and called 10 optometrists offices, without getting an appointment within a reasonable time frame.


After 15:00 the pain began to disappear.


DECEMBER 2018


3 Dec. 2018

Dr. Schultz - 9.15: this doctor did not disappoint me again, manifesting his human approach and good ethical qualities. He administrated the physiotherapy (supra-spinatus tendinitis - modality), but the St. Mary's Hospital sabotaged this procedure: when I registered myself on the waiting list (sending the requisition by fax), I was told that I'll receive a call in 2 weeks. However, they never contacted me. Then I went to the hospital to investigate, what happened, but found no clues, and was promised again that I will be contacted, but they never called. Dr. Schultz also administrated the test for uric acid.


21 Dec 2018

At 18.00, I met my close friend, Miguel Lamiel (a cult writer, painter, and photographer) - near Metro Charlevoix.


CHAPTER 7. January-April 2017.


JANUARY 2019


15 Jan 2019

Having not succeeded in obtaining an appointment with Dr. Poliquin, I managed to see Dr. Szego (who did not retire yet), at 10.45. The problem discussed was again the external inflammation with ulcerations, dermatitis, unbearable itching, impossibility to seat, and related issues.


Dr. Szego arranged a special lab test, which was later sabotaged by the hospital (under a pretext that they don't do such tests, which was absurd - if to take into consideration that Dr. Szego would not issue a non-practicing test).


He also said that he is concerning about the prostatic safety regarding some proctologic infections, and signed another referral to urologist (the previous one was sabotaged by the CUSM (Royal Victoria Hospital) before 2 urologic operations in 2016-2017).


Dr. Szego was an ONLY conscious doctor, who, despite a suspected ban for OBJECTIVE post-operational (after 2 urological surgeries) tests, administrated an extended evaluation of the remaining - not solved - problems, signing a requisition for a special abdominal-pelvic ultrasound.


31 Jan. 2019

By miracle, I got to another conscious compassionate doctor, who performed the ultrasound with the highest responsibility and professional approach to her duties.


Here (below) are the conclusions of this test:


CLINICAL INDICATIONS:(DNA 2019/01/25) Prostatic U/S // remote operation for calcified lesion in prostate -- now similar similar symptoms. To be scheduled by radiology in next available appointment.

FINDINGS :

Comparative ultrasound performed February 2, 2016.

Prostate is enlarged, measuring 2.7 x 5.2 x 4.3 cm for volume of 32 cc. The volume is slightly protruding in the urinary bladder. The track from previous TURP is visualized in the central aspect of the prostate. Partially calcifying nodules visualized on the right side of the prostate.

Evaluation of the inguinal regions doesn't reveal abnormal lymph nodes.

Urinary bladder is partially distended. No evidence of intravesical stones.

No free fluid in the pelvis.

IMPRESSION:

Large prostate. Status post TURP.

Urinary bladder is not fully distended. No intravesical stone visualized.

To better evaluate the prostate, prostate MRI should be considered. To be correlated with the PSA.

Electronically signed by: Melanie Theriault MD 31/01/2019 3:47 PM.


See below the original (copy) [confidential information removed]


All conclusions are obvious: because of Dr. Morris's medical crimes, the problems, which he and the Medical System, and the governmental agents, provoked, became so significant - that even 2 urological surgeries did not solve some of them, and some of them have reestablished as soon as after 2 years.


Besides, while Dr. El-Hakim treated me (his patient) professionally and with the highest ethical stand, literary saving me from potential murderers, 2 operational (or post-operational) staff members have sabotaged the procedure, causing irreversible complications, and, possibly, all the unsolved - after 2 surgeries - problems.


In addition, I was punished for my protests against Dr. Morris's brutality by the complete denial of the access to urological care, and, since Dr. El-Hakim's own health conditions have dramatically worsened, I was left (by the government) without ANY urologist.


25 Jan 2019

An appointment for a transrectal Ultrasound was scheduled for 10:45 (D5129). The appointment was rescheduled to 31 Jan. by me.


31 Jan 2019

The hospital (this time, Montreal General Hospital) again refused to perform a transrectal Ultrasound (at 11.00) (D5129), and a simple pelvic ultrasound was performed, without preparation and drinking 1 liter of water in advance.


A radiologist doctor herself scanned the pelvis, saying there no stones, but without preparation and without water in bladder it was, perhaps, not efficient.


FEBRUARY 2019


6 Feb. 2019

Dr. Lesk - at 9.20.


When Dr.'s associate put drops in my eyes before some tests, I could not see: everything became blurry, and I could not see normally for 2 hours after this. She told (answering my question) that the lights gave such an effect, but the vision became obscured BEFORE she put me on checks with lights.


I also noticed that the intraocular pressure jumped from 12x15 at the technician's assistant office - to 16x18, when I was assessed by doctor's associate.


Dr. Lesk prescribed an ointment medication, to treat eyes' infection.


MARCH 2019


7 March 2019

Started ointment.


9 March 2019

9 March 2019 - 11.40 - 13.30: sudden constipation after 6 days of diarrhea, with "stone-hard" or clay-like sticky masses, and with some kind of obstruction.


2 hours of unrestrained urge - with "microscopic" results, but with pain, bleeding, and sensation of a complete blockage in the colon. No efforts, no methods helped. Finally, clay masses were shot out in a special way. Colon's and rectal canals were injured, blood vessels bleeding, pain increasing.


How could it happen in 24 hours after diarrhea, and without any anti-diarrhea medications or chemicals?


13 March 2019

An emergency appointment with Dr. Szego.


Regarding this appointment, it was needed because of the both gastroenterological and urological aggravation.


The urological aggravation was not limited by dysury, micturition, urgency, uterus pain, etc., but had also other symptoms and syndromes.


Concerning the gastroenterological aggravation, I made a note for myself, which contained several points:


1. Saturday, 9 March 2019: acute obstructed colon (+great col.) combined with constipation and hard stool (acute urges for bowel movement vs blocking obstacle = pain, internal injury, bleeding, swelling of the varicose veins, more narrowing; the whole process took 3 hours). Blood vessels" injuries produced no gross external but (probably) almost entirely internal bleeding (partial bowels" obstruction, blood clots" formation, thrombosis, or even sepsis and danger of gangrene?).

2. Sunday, 10 March 2019: no stool.

3. Monday, 11 March 2019: diarrhea + more obstructed colon (1 hour of painful passing small portions of half-liquid masses and some blood, then 3 other similar episodes like this). After the 1-st episode: uterus pain, and 8 hours of multiple urgency sensations with inability to pass urine. After the 2-nd episode: 3 days of proctologic inconsistency.


HISTORY:

1997: stomach bacteria found by endoscopy; antibiotic therapy has eliminated all gastroenterological problems till 2006.

2006: chronic diarrhea or severe constipation, almost no normal stool; frequent stomach-bowels pain; chronic ramp"s (fundament"s) skin inflammation + ulcerous dermatitis (preventing from sitting normally for months); gradual formation of internal varicose, and strongest painful spasms of blood vessels inside the lower colon.

2007 or 2008: endoscopy done at the old Royal Victoria hospital (rapport and all data disappeared).

2009-2010: 2 exams with a flexible tube in doctor"s office (findings: obstructing uterus, non-significant internal varicose).

2011-2019: episodes of hematochezia: 8 March 2011 [Tuesday] (hematochezia+hematuria); 6 March 2012 [Tuesday] (hematochezia+hematuria); 7 July 2012 [Saturday] (hematochezia); 5 March 2013 [Tuesday] (hematochezia+hematuria); 7 July 2013 [Sunday] (hematochezia); 4 March 2014 [Tuesday] (hematochezia); 7 March 2015 [Saturday] (hematochezia+hematuria); 27 October 2016 [Thursday] (hematochezia); 2-3 March 2016 [Wednesday-Tuesday] (gross! hematochezia+hematuria); 9-11 March 2019 [Saturday-Monday] (hematochezia). + After colonoscopy - see below.

2012: 22 September 2012 - colonoscopy. The report and supporting papers (in exception of 1 single page) disappeared. The rest says: splenic flexure - telangiectatic; sigmoid - altered vascularity; small internal varicose. Recommendations: follow ups on the results of the biopsy specimens. The biopsy results have never come out; colonoscopy findings considered insignificant; no treatment provided. After colonoscopy: gross! hematuria and hematochezia, urinal tract infection, fever, strong pain, discharges of blood clots, etc. After colonoscopy - gastroenterological problems have doubled.

2013-2018: requests for new exams with a flexible tube, for capsule endoscopy, virtual colonoscopy, etc. - rejected by MDs. A new colonoscopy proposed by doctor was declined by me. Also: 4 or 5 requisitions for transrectal ultrasound were ignored in hospitals (last time - January 31, 2019); pelvic ultrasound was performed instead, or no US at all. Also: incomplete, not performed (under the pretext of "no specimen" (!) or "gases obscuring") or vanished innumerous laboratory tests (all kinds of stool tests), and other tests (stomach X-rays, ultrasounds, CT-scan, etc.).

In 2012-2018 repeated suggestions to MDs that there is a joint prostatic-proctology problem: obstructive for bladder and bowels' empting uterus, or a problem in the wall between them, or a joint vascular pattern, etc. In response, few transrectal ultrasounds and an MRI ordered; all were blocked by radiologies (see above). Also was suggested: episodes of simultaneous hematochezia - hematuria and innumerous UTIs may indicate a chronic lower bowel pattern + chronic stomach-bowels" infection, and that permanent skin ulcerous inflammation around the external "proctologic" area may indicate the same (periodically, skin was always wet not just because of dermatological problems, but also because an infiltrate from an internal area).

3 months after urologic surgery (Dec. 2016) all urological and the most tormenting gastroenterological problems were gone. However, in August 2018 - some symptoms have reappeared, including extremely painful varicose spasms inside the colon, uterus pain associated with bowel movement, etc.


Dr. Szego requested a visual-digital + flexible tube examination by his colleagues (he did not do it himself, possibly, regarding his age), but they declined his request. He also suggested an abdominal-pelvic+transrectal US before eventual colonoscopy; referral to a specialist, who can assess and manage such emergency cases, but all his requests were sabotaged.


An inevitable conclusion can be done: all efforts of such compassionate and responsible doctors as Dr. Szego were blocked for years by the System, artificially boosting and prolonging my suffering.


15 March 2019

On March 15, 2019, I made a call to Dr. Szego's secretary, describing my situation as an urgency, but she said - "go to Emergency".


Naturally, I did not go to Emergency, as every one can understand my reasons after reading this extended testimony.


18 March 2019

With difficulties, I managed to obtain an appointment to Clinique LaSalle MediCentre.


The appointment was at 12.00, and I came at 11.25.


All people in waiting room changed 3 times - while I was waiting, and a young man, who came without any appointment, was called in, but not me.


I was seen by doctor at 14.50, waiting more than 3 hours, while everyone, who recommended me this clinic, said that the waiting time there is never more then 15-20 min.


In addition, the doctor provided no help in my situation.


Judging by the last 5-6 months, the persecutions in the medical institutions returned to the previous scale, or, in other words, to the pre-operational (I mean 2 urological surgeries) level.


My medical tests disappear in medical laboratories again; I am discriminated in the clinics, waiting 2-4 times longer than all other patients, regardless of the urgency and gravity of my situation; and if the compassionate doctors administrate right therapies, exams, tests, or medication, those are sabotaged by the physiotherapy departments, radiologes, labs, and pharmacies.


19 March 2019

Having a catastrophic worsening of my vision, I decided to hear a second opinion, and spoke directly to Dr. Saheb, who, as a decent person, compassionately treated my case, and arranged an appointment at 9.15 (March 2019).


I came at 9.00, in time, but the secretary (same - who called about the appointment) said that, allegedly, the appointment was scheduled for 18 Mar 2019.


However, I had a telephone conversation recording, and there is clear that she pronounced not "18", but "19 March, 2019".


It must be something more than just a mistake, because the secretary did not blame me for not coming 18, and just gave another appointment right away.


This is just another fact that my appointments are very often (systematically) sabotaged.


20 March 2019

On March 20, 2019, having symptoms a gastroenterological and urological infection, and other rather significant urological problems recurrence (1-st time after 2 surgeries), I made a call to Dr. El-Hakim's secretary, but she said - "go to Emergency".


I can only guess that Dr. El-Hakim became so sick that does not seeing patients, or seeing exclusively patients that were scheduled weeks or months in advance.


27 March 2019, Wednesday

Finally, I could see Dr. Saheb, at 13.30.


Some days, I don't feel pressure in the eyes, and it was such a day, and, besides, eyes pain and sensation of pressure starts mostly after 17:00. So, it is not surprising that the L. Eye IOP was 14, and the R. Eye - 13.


Fortunately, despite my worsening vision, there are no significant changes.


Dr. Saheb said: "Glaucoma in the L. Eye is a bit more advanced than in the R. Eye, but still a very mild glaucoma... It is hard to say if glaucoma has been advancing since Nov. 2017, because a longer time span is needed, and more visual field tests must be compared..."


29 March 2019

Another appointment was cancelled in March by the medical institutions. It was an appointment with my family doctor (Dr. Rohan), scheduled for 11:15, but it was cancelled by his secretary, who changed to 3 Apr. 2019.


APRiL 2019


1 Apr. 2019, Monday

I suppose to see Dr. Poliquin at 13.50, but my turn came only at 17.24.

Unlike other doctors, Dr. Poliquin agreed to see digital photos of affected areas, and of some other symptoms (including frequent internal bleedings), made during the periods of recurrences and aggravations.

His conclusions were: that colonoscopy and endoscopy are needed for defining the problems.

He also wrote a letter to Dr. Szego, hoping that - before the later retires soon - he can arrange for me some additional procedures and prescriptions, which Dr. Poliquin could hardly administrate through the small local area health center. (See below)


Dr. Poliquin shared my positive opinion about Dr. Szego, not just because he avoided to express himself negatively about his colleagues, but it was clear that he speaks naturally and honestly when referring to Dr. Szego as to a very ethical doctor and good specialist.


Dr. Poliquin signed requisitions for colonoscopy and endoscopy, and told that the Verdun Hospital is going to contact me in around 1.5 or 2 months.


Running forward: I was contacted by the Verdun Hospital after 7 (!!!) months, and was told that the date for colonoscopy-endoscopy appointment is after tomorrow. I was shocked that two invasive procedures were combined in one, as if I am a healthy young horse, and can survive any unnecessary torture. The nurse, who contacted me, gave no explanation. I also told the calling person that, besides, they are giving me not enough time for colonoscopy preparations, and that I have another very important medical appointment at the same day, and almost at the same time. This is why, I said, I demand to reschedule the date of the procedure, and to split 2 procedures for 2 different dates. But she said that changing the date of the appointment is not possible, and that for obtaining another appointment for colonoscopy and endoscopy - I must see the doctor again, and to obtain from him another requisition, and to be registered then for the waiting list from the scratch.


It is obvious that - by all norms and judgements, the colonoscopy and endoscopy procedures were blatantly sabotaged.


Someone, accessing my combined governmental medical file (Sante Quebec), saw the date of another important medical appointment, which I could not miss, and - deliberately - scheduled the colonoscopy-endoscopy exam for that particular date and time. In addition, they combined colonoscopy and endoscopy in one procedure, knowing that I'll refuse it in such a format, and, finally, they gave me no time for preparation for colonoscopy.


17 April 2019, I also sent a fax to Dr. Poliquin, asking for considering some contraindications:


Monsieur le Docteur,

J"ai oublié de mentionner qu"avant que je passe une colonoscopie, il faut tenir compte des informations suivantes :

1. Historique de thrombocytes faibles et les autre résultats anormales. (Une prise de sang complète est attendue avant toute procédure médicale invasive.).

2. Historique de [hématurie-rectorragie] pendant une ou deux semaines après des cystoscopies et des colonoscopies, ainsi que d"infections urinaires aiguës. (Une dose préventive d"antibiotiques est attendue avant une colonoscopie). Je dois consulter l'urologue.

3. Cas fréquents de très haute ou très basse pression (> 50). (Dans de tels cas, toute procédure invasive est dangereuse).

4. Glaucome à angles fermés : la consommation de 4-5 litres de liquide peut provoquer la pression intraoculaire destructive.

Dans un tel cas, la colonoscopie doit être arrêtée.

5. D"autres problématiques doivent être discutées avant une colonoscopie.

C"était mon devoir de vous tenir au fait de ces facteurs.

Salutations distinguee, Lev Gunin.


Dr. Poliquin responded - informing me that he asked the hospital and his assistant to evaluate my note and to contact me; however, no one contacted me in this case.


3 Apr. 2019, Wednesday

It was an appointment with Dr. Rohan, scheduled for 11.30.


Here (below) is the reminder, which I wrote down for myself, for discussion with my family doctor:


1. Swollen & stiff fingers, bursting skin with multiple small wounds, considerable pain. Arthritis? Diabetic skin? Low platelet count? Infection?


2. Back pain that affects almost all movements. 2 episodes of sensitivity loss, back pain - when going up the stairs, or lifting higher the feet suggest the spinal cord involvement.


3. Pain in both shoulders; hips; wrists and other joints.


Requests: 1) referral to urologist (I saw a urologist last time more than 1.5 y. ago - after 2 urological surgeries, and several recurrences after!); 2) blood-urine tests (with microbiology); 3) abdominal-pelvic US (if possible); 4) urgent arthritis adequate diagnostics and treatment; 5) prescription for Voltaren (it is too expensive for me to buy).


Dr. Rohan reacted to some of my requests, issuing a requisition for lab tests.


5 Apr. 2019

Urine - blood test.


9 Apr. 2019, Tuesday

Finally, I received an appointment for few séances of physiotherapy at the same center, where Dr. Poliquin works. However, as I found out soon: this physiotherapy here is only for money, and for big backs; so, it was just a mirage.


10 Apr 2019, Wednesday

I went to a walk-in clinic with the same bunch of unsolved problems: arthritis, urological and gastroenterological problems, allergy, skin problems, and so on.

I spent several hours waiting, but was not seen by doctor.


12 Apr. 2019, Friday

An appointment with Dr. Szego (9.30). He gave me several advises, and signed a referral to urologist again, hoping that THIS TIME I'll be able to see a doctor.


CHAPTER 8. May-December 2017.


MAY 2019


1-2 MAY 2019

I was trying to arrange the issued by Dr. Poliquin colonoscopy (tel. 514-362-1000-65280).

However, there is no date and time for an appointment.


6 May 2019

The "alternative" Ultrasound (13.30, 5300 Cote-des-Neiges, room 600) is an example of how the significant problems are downplayed by the laboratories and radiologes, and how some of the tests' elements are just omitted by the pretext of the "gases obstruction" (see below):


10 May 2019, Friday

Almost same disastrous constipation-hard stool - as 9 March 2019, with just lighter consequences, because I understood in advance, what"s going on, and took some measures. Complications lasted 3 days; the lower intestine was injured again.


16 May - 19 May 2019

Since 16 May 2019 - to 19 May: a flu.

All family members were sick, including the baby.

Only I was not sick, but when my wife gave me the rest of the bilberry after our small grand-daughter ate them, I became sick, too.


JUNE 2019


4 June 2019

I was assessed by Dr. Schultz (the appointment was scheduled at 13.00) again.


Since the beginning of aggravation of the urological and gastroenterological problems, the arthritis has started to hit me again.


I complained to Dr. Schultz that the physiotherapy appointed by him was sabotaged by the St. Mary's Hospital, and he promised to help, but, again, I never heard from St. Mary's physiotherapy department. The Dr. advised me an ointment for local use.


Dr. Schultz also prescribed Celebrex, and appointed some additional lab tests and a bone density scan. However, St. Mary's Hospital, after registering me on their waiting list for this procedure, never contacted me.


This is just another example - how the best and most decent doctors can do nothing, if the System is placing a patient under politically motivated persecutions.


An indirect proof that I am under a cup of the System, which do some attempts to mitigate all efforts of the conscious doctors (like Dr. Schultz) to improve my health, can be read in what happened before I saw Dr. Schultz.


In Dr. Schulz"s office, another (a female) doctor called me in.

She gave me strange questions like today"s date, my age, my address, my telephone number, and my email address.

When I told her my birth year, she insisted on how old I am.

I told her that she can figure it out herself, but she said she"s not so good in counting by heart.

Then I said that I am 64.

She started asking me about all kind of things, like all surgeries that I had in my life, all the illnesses that I ever had; about all medical doctors, whom I visited.

I narrowed the topic, concentrating of just rheumatologists.

She wrote down name of every one of rheumatologists I mentioned, and also asked, what nationality they were.

She justified such a strange question by telling that she"s an Albanian, but there is not a justification, of course.

I characterized all of them as very good doctors (which is true), including Dr. Schulz.

She asked, when and how arthritis problems have started, and I told that in 2001, with a urological infection and refusal of antibiotics.

When I noticed something weird in her questions, I asked, why she, but not Dr. Schulz is seeing me.

And only by then she asked my name and age (again!).

She pretended that I am not her patient, and that I just misheard the name, which she called, because she called Rodriguez ... and I am not him.

However, I remember very well, and have no doubt that she called me in her room by my name: Lev Gunin.

Besides, Rodriguez (and his second name is something like Fernandez) and Lev Gunin have nothing in common, and sound completely different.

Plus, this day my hearing was radically better than most of the time, and no hiss or noise in my ears.

And, besides, Mr. Rodriguez was sitting right here with his daughter, and if the doctor would called HIS name indeed - and not mine - they would stood up and would walk to the room. Mr. Rodriguez (with his daughter) was sitting much closer to the room occupied by this female doctor, and, if she would call him, they would be near the room ahead of me definitely. So, they had enough time to react, but they did not even move. (I must add that things fell to the floor from my rucksack, and I spent some time gathering them: consequently, the doctor did not pronounced "Rodriguez" - as she pretended; no way). My reaction was also slowed down, because I"ve expected Dr. Schulz to call me to his room.

So, they continued to sit, manifesting no reaction, which mean that the doctor did not call this gentleman.

It is also clear that I could go with a stranger only if she absolutely CLEARLY spelled my name.

It definitely was a weird provocation.


An appointment was also scheduled with Dr. Saheb (another decent doctor), for retina (eye bottom) check-up with dilation, but it was cancelled by the hospital, and I did not insist on this appointment, because already became a patient of Dr. Lesk, and already was convinced that it is better for me to stay a patient of a French hospital.


5 June 2019, Wednesday

Gastroenterological bleeding while empting the stomach; fresh red blood in the toilet and on the paper.

I had an appointment with my family doctor at 9.30, for the reason of the aggravated gastroenterological crisis.


7 June 2019, Friday

Spinal X-Ray, on Dr. Schultz's requisition, in new Royal Victoria, at approximately 12.30.

After my wife dropped me from the car near Vendum Metro, photo-camera (Nikon Fine Pixels) just vanished.

Our small granddaughter was sleeping in the car, and my wife was afraid that a long stop could awake the baby. She nervously hurried me, also because the car stopped at an intersection, and, in a hurry, I, perhaps, dropped the small Nikon camera, a gift from my son-in-law, the husband of my younger daughter. It is also possible that the camera was just stolen inside the hospital. When, a day later, I came with my younger daughter and her husband to the hospital, the camera was not found in the "lost and found" section.


19 people, who came after me, had their tests done ahead of me, and I was called in only after one technician nurse complained that a patient is forgotten by the staff.


10 June 2019, Monday

Our financial situation became so hopeless, that I had to cancel the tuning of the piano.


17 June 2019, Monday

Today, I had an appointment with Dr. Tran, the dentist, at 13.30.

The last appointment with her was before rather a long brake, because, after the evaluation of my situation (during 3 operations of teeth extractions, other dentists damaged the right scull, and broke some of the alveolar bones), which needed a complicated facial-dentist reconstruction operation, unavailable for me because of the enormous cost. I did not know - what to do, - and, puzzled, plunged into limbo...

I suspect that the government blocked the money, which my friends and lovers of my music have sent from Europe for my treatment. I suspect that the initiator of similar money blockages and confiscations was the member of Trudeau government, Christia Freeland, a Jewish-Ukrainian origin, who started to transform herself from a sane morally person and not a bad politician - into a bloody executioner, on who's order personal bank accounts of the Freedom Convoy participants were massively freeze, and people were struggling to fed themselves and their children, to pay the rent, and to buy essential needs. There are several indications that such a fascist tool was used already in 2018-2019 against some of the dissidents.

Dr. Tran assessed the situation, and discovered that 2 lower wisdom tooth have cavities; tooth 46 and 48 are problematic; and upper high right prelast molar has a cavity under the gum, near the end of the root canal, which can not be fixed.

She treated one of the teeth, which did not require the treatment of the root canal, and that's all.


JULY 2019


3 July 2019

I had to see Dr. Rohan at 9.45, due to still unsolved medically problems covering urology, dermatology, gastroenterology, and rheumatology. If the medical help was not sabotaged by the vicious, cruel doctors, then the efforts of the conscious human doctors were sabotaged by labs, radiologes, or pharmacies.


The denial of medical help in case of the simplest and healable health problems is provoking an avalanche of innumerous health issues in a patient, and this, in turn, is triggering the crash of the whole system of medical help. If doctors and other medics were accountable for negligence, indifference, sabotage, protectionism, social or racial discrimination, money extortion, corruption, and denial of medical help, it would save billions of dollars, and would free the public health care from millions of unnecessary (if the small problems were treated properly and in time) appointments and medical procedures.


After 17.30, at children park, a Muslim woman filmed or photographed us with her cell-phone (3rd time - the same women at different places).


11 July 2019

Dr. Lesk - 9.20.


Dr. Lesk said that in 10-12 months he's going to perform another surgery (on top of the iridothomy that was done in May 2017), the same that Dr. Saheb was planning to do in 2017 - after a possible cataract surgery: to prevent the frequent glaucoma attacks.


25 July 2019, Thursday

At 10:10, I had to see Dr. Viviott, but the appointment was transferred to January 28, 11.30.


27 July 2019, Saturday

Today, it was the wedding party of my younger daughter.

The celebration had to take place in a luxury restaurant in a rural area, around 80 km from Montreal.


But, before the departure for the wedding (the restaurant was located in an old water-mill of the 18 or 19-th century), the next trouble happened to me.


And - again - it happened at improbable combination of circumstances.


When I approached the car (maximally widely opening the second left side door) to climb up on the seat, the car suddenly moved forward, having run with its left back wheel onto my right leg, and instantly stopped precisely on my foot.


If the wheel would just roll through my leg, it would be not so dreadful, and would cause fewer damages.


Any explanation - why it was necessary to push the car slightly forward (aggressively, breaking through, and immediately striking the brakes) - and to stop sharply instantly: does not exist. The second left side door was opened wide open; the trunk door was opened wide open; the driver (looking in the middle salon mirror) should see that I am not sitting in the car, and the rest of my body is still outside, and, still, did such an illogical move.


Despite my inhuman shout, the one, who was driving the car, reacted not at once, and not at once understood - what has occurred, and then got out of the car - to see, where to move the car (forward - or back), to release my leg. So, there passed about 3-5 minutes until the wheel moved out of my foot. And it, clearly, strengthened the injuries.


Besides, the heavy car (HRV) - some kind of a jeep - was loaded by heavy bags and boxes (we went to a wedding!) to the top of the trunk. 3 people were sitting inside the car, and heavt boxes were also inside the salon. It is from the category of inexplicable miracles that such a huge weight did not crush my foot and did not shatter it into small pieces: in spite of the fact that I was not wearing some heavy-duty footwear, but on the contrary, the cheapest semi-soft sneakers.


But, if to remember how, in 2007, even a more massive car, having roared with its motor, hit me and brought me down, and I flew over its cowl to the other side (having landed on both legs), and got off "only" with a severe injury of both legs' blood vessels, without having damaged anything else: there is nothing more should be surprising.


Incomprehensibly, how the driver could not notice or ignore both wide opened doors, the absence of the passenger on the back seat (with just passenger's head in profile in the doorway, indications of electronics (the DOOR is OPEN!), and, in addition, before the maneuver, he turned his head back - as though he was ready to give back: and, so, had to see, in principle, that I am standing outside.


It is necessary to add, to all the above-mentioned facts, my conversation with my older daughter, concerning the cardboard box lying on seat - because of which I could not sit down at once (otherwise would crush the box and everything in it): when I asked where to move away this box that prevent me from sitting. My question was turned also to the driver, and, therefore, was expressed in French, and it was clear that I did not get into the car, and that my legs are somewhere near the wheels.


If someone else drove the car, it was still possible "to believe" in the incident. But, in this case, it is just impossible to believe that it could occur. I am absolutely sure that he is a good person. It is clear both on the everyday things, and at the emotional level. And he is a responsible driver. Everything that he does - he does thoroughly, with responsibility and understanding. He is a technical, rational person, an athlete, with an excellent reaction and attention, and a very trained driver.


Therefore, it is possible to conclude that there something terrible occurred not only in the sense of the incident, but also in the sense that something incomprehensible happened to him. And I suspect that it could be somehow connected with the presence of our Israeli guests. I do not mean that they were part of some plot or acted consciously to provoke this accident, but I mean that the citizens of such a SPECIAL state could be used, without their knowledge, as some kind of the "mediation devices", through their mobile phones, or other electronic devices, or through some other manipulations.


When, at last, the car moved down from my foot, I cried at once that I must be carried to a hospital, but having taken off the sock and having convinced that nothing extremely awful is visible, I asked to bring ice, and went to my daughter's wedding. Stopped by at drugstore, we bought a bandage and iodine (I asked this and that), and - on the road - I held ice, and then about an hour more, doing by a break, every 15 minutes.


Then, there was no opportunity to put the ice: the wedding ceremony, the meeting of guests, etc., followed, and I had to hobble on the crushed leg all the time. We forgot to buy Tylenol, and it was necessary to smile to guests, overcoming the pain.


But there was more to come.


3 days prior to the wedding, an electric motor scooter nearly flew on me, when I stood on the corner of the sidewalk, and the scooter passed by. The sidewalk in that place level is with a carriageway, and the motor scooter, turning to the right, cut off the corner coming directly on the sidewalk, so, that helmets of two men sitting in their saddles, having bent under a strong corner, passed somewhere in millimeters from my breast. I jumped aside, and, having stumbled, felt a knee pain. So - now it was already the second trauma.


In the hall, we put the keyboard stand with the full keyboard on it, and I, despite this serious trauma (which significance was still too early to judge about by then), decided to play at least a part of the prepared program. (The financial situation of my younger daughter is very difficult.). The wedding in Canada costs huge money and to invite musicians is one more, additional, item of expenditure.


Circle of my daughters' friends - generally: are people of art, musicians, actors, directors, singers - and they play and sing at each other weddings. The duet of her friends - keyboard-violin - performed at the wedding of my younger daughter; a famous singer (a girlfriend of my oldest daughter, who also accompanied her) sang; but the lion's share of time remained for me.


And here, after just few hours ago a heavy car ran onto my foot, I, overcoming pain, took seat at the keyboard, and an hour and a half played, breaking a hot applause.


I put a pedal under my left foot, and pianists and keyboard players know and will understand - what it means, how it prevents the coordination of movements.


I think, there will be not much pianists, in general capable to use the left leg for pressing of the right pedal, and the vast majority is incapable to play this way.


The electric piano was awful (we borrowed the cheapest), the sound was wful (I slightly improved things, having changed the sound on the panel, thanks to my extensive experience); wild noises have reached us from below (from the second floor), preventing to play; the blows "boom-boom-boom" were going non-stop: the restaurant owner, having violating the contract, allowed other wedding at the same time, and there they were playing low-taste loud "music" through very powerful (unlike ours!) huge loudspeakers' columns, producing a primitive, low-standard musical noise.


But, contrary to everything, I played at least a half of the program, until the pain in the foot and in the whole leg tore me off from the keyboard finally, and such sincere and hot applause - were very valuable not only because almost exclusively musicians sat in the hall (those who studied once with my daughters at FACE school with a musical profile, at a ballet school, at the musical college and at the conservatory - at the musical department of the university (with our oldest daughter).

The Israeli guests were there, too.


It is necessary to add few words about them.


As my situation is very complicated and tricky, and the digital terrorism is used against me - to destroy my computers, to send myriads of computer viruses, to hack my electronic postboxes and systems, to cut off my access to Internet, to prevent my communications with people of similar ideas: any non-secured access to my network premises boosts my vulnerability exponentially.


On the other hand, modern generations, brainwashed and turned into zombies, are not capable to live without a 24-hours access to Internet even one single day.


When I proposed the boy and his mother to turn on Internet for them on their request at any time, they were shocked - and declared that they demand a permanent connection to Internet for their devices 7 days per week 24 hours per day.


And they brought with them 3 tablet computers, 2 laptops, and 3 cellular phones!


When I asked - why do they need so many Internet-accessing devices, they told nothing.


Next day after their arrival, I found a way to offer them an alternative Internet-access, with even higher speed than my and my wife's home Internet, but they felt offended by a "separate" access, suspected that our home Internet-access is faster, and started a "small" war on me for such an approach.


The boy, a gamer-addict, was enraged not only by his own problem of games addiction, but was, probably, provoked by the whole young gamers' community, or, in other words, by other addicts.


He violated the interdiction to connect to our network without my wife's and mine permission, found a very carefully hidden modem (even moving the pieces of furniture for this goal), copied the access code, and connected his 2 mobile phones and other devices directly to Internet.


In response, I created a separate gateway for the guests in the router, not protected with a password, and the 2-nd one, protected and inaccessible for them.


However, this young boy had advanced computer-network skills, amazing for his age, and he somehow apprehended what I did, especially, that the Internet speed, unfortunately, decreased a little bit for both separate gates.


To boost the Internet speed, the lad cracked my network, and restored the general common access, eliminating the separation. For this, he had to reset physically the router by pressing its resetting button with a needle.


His actions already placed my personal security at risk and under a great threat, especially taking into consideration the special nature of the country he came from.


His mother also behaved in many instances with the same irresponsibility and offence.


In spite of our demands to respect our privacy in our apartment, the guests were filming each other, or some things that they were buying in Montreal not only in "their" room (which we completely gave away for them for 1 month of their stay), but everywhere in the apartment. They did not care that my wife, and me - we are exposed to their phones' digital cameras.


Several times, they left their tablet computers in different places in our apartment with the video recording session running and registering everything that happens around the camera's review circle.


Sadly, such an egoistic and blatant behavior reflects the common lack of ethics among the majority of their co-citizens, because the lad is obviously a good person, just spoiled and morally non-educated, and with some psychological problems. But this is a general problem in that very special country, and, in a lesser sense, a problem of his whole generation world-wide.


No wonder that some bad guys could take advantage of this situation for striking another blow at me.


I don't want to specify, how I learned that 2 boy's best friends are from the families of policemen, and that all 3 of them seeing themselves - as adults - like policemen or secret services' agents. Of course, some of young people are naïve idealists, and, if they have a consistent positive nature, they will choose other professions, or will do good deeds even in police uniform, because good people are needed everywhere. But this fact tells about an additional objective threat independently from the question about the boy's more serious ethical breaches, which I doubt, because, I repeat, of his good nature. That's why the matter is not in him, but in the fact that he was a passionate gamer, and had (as I suggest) some paranormal gifts like destructing someone's attention, provoking someone's involuntary movements and elevated nervosity.


Bad guys could use him as an inductor and deductor (as a mediating device), if they were planning a terrorist act, or, rather, were just testing such a technique, and the closest "testing object" for victimizing found me.


Anyways, our guests' behavior has put at risk my security, and, maybe, not occasionally this accident happened in their presence. Modern technologies are capable of everything.


It is enough to add that I discovered an exact clone of my wife's mobile phone in our network. When my wife was away - far away from home, - another device of exactly the same model and with exactly the same IP number used to be detected by my network controlling software 3-5 times per day. Sometimes, when my wife's phone was inactive in the corridor, and our guests were sleeping in their room at night, the same device used to be still detected actively connected to Internet resources.


There were 5 or 6 other phenomenon of similar nature during that month.


It means that someone's activity (related to my vulnerability concerning the presence of the guests) was already exploited to take an advantage of the situation: to harm me.


5 Sep. 2019

I had a scheduled appointment at 9.00 with Dr. El-Hakim.

However, when I called for confirmation, his secretary told me that the doctor is feeling unwell, and transferred the appointment to September 20, 2019, at 11:50.


20 Sep. 2019, Friday

Finally, I could see Dr. El-Hakim at 13:40 (my appointment was scheduled for 11:50).

He looked even more devastated by some illness, and it was frightening and shocking for me.

Dr. El-Hakim studied the last comprehensive ultrasound report, which revealed significant problems, including enlarged (again! in less than 2 years after the operation!) and protruding in the urinary bladder (!) uterus with partially calcifying nodules on its right side, and just partially distended urinary bladder (which is threatening by a recurrence of lithiasis).


And, again, he put the whole blame exclusively on himself, saying that "there were unexpected undesirable complications during the operation", and that "we did not take some factors into consideration".


However, he gave me a hint, when added that the 2 urological surgeries "were unplanned", and performed in not favorable conditions and situation. He did not say directly that - as for an unplanned surgery - there were restricted equipment and personnel resources, but this was obvious considering his general hints.


He said that "nobody will plan another, new surgery" for me in next few years, and that, considering all "pro" and "contras", he doubts if such a surgery can be safe for me in Canada. This was the most transparent hint that all complications and undesirable results of 2 urological surgeries might be a result of someone's sabotage and diversion.


Thus, concluded Dr. El-Hakim, he recommends me to prepare myself for living with all these uncomfortable consequences, psychologically adjusting to them, because, in general, he said, with all the prophylactic measures already known to me, I may spend the rest of my life without any life-threatening urological problems, which would need another surgical intervention. He admitted that all functions have been restored, and there is no immediate threat.


However, I thought at this moment, all this possible only if antibiotics will be prescribed without sabotage and in time, in case of potential further infections.


Concerning the new calcification of the uterus, he said that he will prescribe some medications, which - maybe - could partially ease this problem, and we must only hope that it will help.


And he prescribed 3 medications.


If I am not mistaken, this was the very last time, when I saw Dr. El-Hakim. 1.5 or 2 years after my family doctor told me that Dr. El-Hakim passed away. Later I heard from other 2 doctors about this sad news, but never received any confirmation.


In 2019, Dr. El-Hakim was a man in his 40-s...


OCTOBER 2019


17 Oct. 2019

At 19:00, I had an appointment with Dr. Roi, the dentist, who was practicing not at his own private clinic, but at the clinic situated in East Montreal, very far from my home: 1831 Ontario Est.


However, this appointment was transferred to Nov. 7, 2019, 14:00, because of the flu.


13 - 23 Oct. 2019


Saturday (12-th of October, 2019), we had a party on my grand-daughter"s 2-nd birthday.


Next day, the 13-th of October, I was eating darker grapes, when my wife added to the same plate a part of lighter grapes, which was left after the birthday party. We had an agreement that, if she brings some food from outside home, she has to tell me, but this time she said nothing.


I was listening to an interesting radio podcast, and was taking the grapes from the plate almost without looking, automatically, distracted by the radio, and noticed the different-color grapes too late (when already ate several of them). Each of more light grapes was, besides, cut half-and-half (for children, who came to the birthday party).


When I noticed it, I became frightened and worried, because I know that any infection, including a flu, can be disastrous for me if infection's biological material gets to my body massively, like with food, or into the bloodstream.


I had so many infections, and took so many courses of antibiotics (more then 50 in just last 15 years) that my organism"s autoimmune reaction became dangerous by itself.


In 2016, the level of leucocytes ones reached almost 30 thousand, and - afterwards - the whole blood formula was deregulated (even more than before) for almost 2 years.


Only very recently my blood tests showed normal results on all components, which is a small miracle, and now I was hoping that they will stay like this, if no other infections will attack me in the recent future.


I am catching a flu rarer than the general public: once in 4-5 years, and very benign. Sometimes all members of my family become sick, except me. And, when other family members feel sick for a week or more, I am sick with some flu symptoms not longer than just 3-4 days.


I was also afraid - because - in last 2 weeks - my hearing has started to degrade more than before. When I used to listen to my player (music or radio), I usually put the volume to 11, and that was enough. Then - gradually - after 2 last weeks even 15 was not enough. I suspected a vascular impact. So, I worried that in such a situation a flu can cause a father damage to my ears.


I was also afraid of complication, which could affect not only the blood formula again, but the cardio-vascular system, ears, eyes, and could trigger another arthritis attack. I was also worried, because - around 3 weeks ago - my wife poured a tomato juice into my cup, filled by a dishwasher liquid, and put the cup on the table, at my place. (Her casual mistake was completely my fault). I made two throats, before my reaction has stopped me. Since then, I felt something like a foreign object in my throat, and sometimes painful voice strings, which could become a gateway for an infection.


I immediately ate a small piece of garlic, drunk a glass of tie with honey, and so on, but it did not help. 9-10 hours later I got a very serious flu.


(Besides the infected grapes, there could be one more source of an infection. As early as on October 13, 2019, I felt that something is pricking and stirs in my right foot, but the flu knocked me down, and immediately became so grave that forced me to forget about all other sores. In the evening, on October 14, 2019, I found a huge splinter, which was sticking out of the foot. It was a very thin small metal stick appeared from who knows where. It is interesting that splinters appeared in my feet uncountable number of times, and all this happened at home though I always wear the slippers and socks. But no one from my family members, or from friends and acquaintances ever got a splinter into a foot in our apartment though they walk in socks or in general barefoot. In addition, it must be told that our apartment can be a model for clean and properly kept place, because we never leave things on the floor or in improper places; we sweeping out the floor with a broom, or using a vacuum cleaner every day; and we wash the floor 3-4 times per week; etc.


4-5 hours later I started to feel sore and painful throat, and other symptoms of an acute flu.


It appeared to be a severe flu, which brought light cough, sneezing, strong cold (followed by arthritis after few days), ache in bones, and pathological weakness. The weakness and fatigue soon became so strong that I could only walk to the bathroom and back - with great efforts. The pain in the gorge has intensified so that I could not swallow, and the sore sensation has spread to the areas behind both ears. The pain has spread to both ears, and, after, went to the temples.


From Monday evening or Tuesday pain in the right carotid artery appeared, and became strong enough. Simultaneously, there was also heart pain. When the head was down - I felt an enormous pressure behind each ear, and pain in my right ear and right side of my head. Hours after massaging the carotid artery I succeeded in making the pain there to disappear.


Then came a sharp acute pain in my right ear after some of the strongest coughs or sneezes. Twice even a stronger pain paralyzed me when I involuntary cleaned my nose with minimum efforts. And then the right ear was blocked. It happened Saturday evening, 19 Oct. 2019. At night, in the horizontal position of the body, the ear used to unblock itself, but in the vertical position it appeared to be blocked again. It also had a temporary unblock moments in a response to swallowing or turning the head right-left.


However, in the morning, the ear became unblocked, but with a certain hearing loss.


Same day, around 17:30, the ear suddenly became blocked again, without any particular reason, and stayed unblocked. This time the right ear was not only blocked, but also became almost completely deaf. Every time the head moves down, it accompanying by pain in the carotid artery, and in the temple bone right beside the upper part of the auricle. When I put the head down, I feel also a huge pressure behind each ear; it is like there is something about to burst there. It wasn't so before the flu.


Tuesday, 23 Oct. 2019, I went to Metro-Medic clinic, on the corner of Sherbrook and Guy. I was there at 9:15 - 9:20 a.m.


18 Oct. 2019


This day, 18 Oct. 2019, I supposed to be assessed by a urologist in Royal Victoria (10:20). (Room D... 3310). However, when they called for confirmation, I had to transferred the appointment to 4 Dec. 2019, because was still sick.


23 Oct. 2019, Tuesday

I went to Metro-Medic clinic, on the corner of Sherbrook and Guy. I was there at 9:15 - 9:20 a.m. I received a referral to otolaryngologist.


29 Oct. 2019

Severe complications after the flu have affected my hearing, but, as I decided not to visit Dr. Sejean anymore, the Metro-Medic sent me to another otolaryngologist in a very far away ORL clinic, located at rue St. Luis, ville St.-Laurent (tel.: 514-312-9952; fax: 514-744-8314. 2155), and got an appointment at 13:45 with Dr. Sarah Asulin.


However, as I discovered later, this clinic appeared to be one of the innumerous bogus-public clinics, which receive the public (governmental) financing and resources, but actually treat patients only for money or with a private insurance policy. This is the most massive and the most outraged fraud: the formation of thousands of similar bogus-clinics, which suck public money, but work for private patients.


NOVEMBER 2019


7 Nov. 2019

I had to see Dr. Roi, the dentist, at 14:00, but cancelled the appointment because of the flu.


20-21 Nov. 2019

Another glaucoma attack: pain - Left Eye and L. Temple.


22 Nov. 2019

Suspecting a new glaucoma attack, I visited an optometrist (15:30) at a clinic, located at Sherbrook - McKay, near Concordia (Optique Town, Quebec, 1460 Rue Sherbrooke W.; GOLDEN SQUARE MILE (514) 286-8020).


It looked like a glaucoma attack was confirmed, because - if the IOP pressure on the 3-d day (when the situation already improved) was still - Left eye - 16, Right eye - 19: it suggests the IOP higher than 20 during the past 2 days.


28 Nov. 2019

Finally, I could see Dr. Roi, the dentist (10:00; 1831 Ontario Est).


Very severe problems, which can be equated to war crimes, were provoked by the government, or, more precisely, by the Canadian dental care policy, which exclude representatives of all unprivileged social classes from the number of the true dental care recipients.


Even the teeth removal (extraction) is provided with an enormous hardship for patients in an insufficient socioeconomic situation, and often sabotaged, or offered for free with the lowest standards and violations of the safety protocols.


Such a governmental policy has resulted for me in serious injuries and mutilations.


My right scull was irreversibly injured during teeth extraction; few alveolar bones were broken; and I received a number of other traumas.


Now, if I lose a considerable number of teeth, or all of them, I'll not be able to wear the dentures prostheses, and will lose the function of chewing the food.


And Dr. Roi could not offer any solution. He only repaired 2 fillings (the procedure, which is covered by the public health care), that's all. Next year, when I turn 65, I'll not be eligible even for that, even for teeth removal for free, which is a real nightmare.


DECEMBER 2019


4 Dec. 2019

Only on 4-th of December, 2019, I could see a urologist at Royal Victoria Hospital, Dr. N. Fahmy (the appointment was scheduled at 14:00, room DT3310).


First, I came to the department (clinic) at the lobby level, took a number, and then presented myself to the medical secretary, as a patient, who has an appointment today, at 14:00. (I was there at 13:55).


She responded unfriendly, with an offensive tone, saying that my hospital card has expired, and I must replace it (she did not explain, how and where to go), and also - that I came to a wrong clinic, and must go upstairs.


When I approached the clinic at the 2-nd level, I was stopped by 2 aged women in blue semi-uniform (probably, volunteers), who stopped me, and demanded to show my hospital card, and then told me that I must replace it before being granted an access to the services. When I asked them where is the urology department, they said that I must go up 1 level.


After getting a replaced hospital card, I went to the 3-rd level, but was told that urology is not there, and that I must go 1 level down.


I went there again, and was told that the urology is at the entrance level.


Finally, I came to the entrance level again, and took a number.


This number was the same as all 3 previous numbers in all 3 different places (if reading 71 as 17 in the backwards order).


I waited 30 minutes just to get to the secretary.


When I asked her, why it took so long, she told angrily that the tickets' machine indicates CHECK IN and CHECK OUT, and that I took a "check out" number, which is slower, so, it was only my own fault. When I asked her, what does CHECK IN and CHECK OUT means, she said nothing.


I had to wait another 2 hours, before was called to the room.


Not Dr. Fahmy, but his assistant, a young intern, has assessed my problems. (When he brought me to the room, Dr. Fahmy has showed up at the doorway, and said something to this intern. I did not understand by then that he was speaking about me, and, unfortunately, did not catch up what he said.)


The young man was asking right questions, and meticulously and systematically analyzed and investigated the symptoms. He also performed a digital test, and told that the uterus is enlarged, but not VERY enlarged, and corresponds to my age group's overage.


Then, he went out to speak with Dr. Fahmy, and, after 10-16 minutes, came back together with Dr. Fahmy.


Dr. Fahmy, a man in his 50-s with a very short white beard (the same person, who was speaking with the intern in the doorway before the latest has started the examination), has invited me to sit again in the patient's seat, and the young intern - in the doctor's seat, and sat in the middle of the room on a simple chair, as if he does not belong here.


Without letting me to open my mouth, he started to speak without any brake, as if he was an automatic device, programmed just to read information, but incapable to be engaged in a conversation.


He said that he is not the right medical specialist for me, because he is not a great doctor for the prostate, but specialized in the urinal tract stones. He said that because I am a patient of Dr. El-Hackim, who's a proper specialist for my case, I have to be followed by him. This is the reason, why he's rejecting me as a patient. This was his main idea, but he spoke too much, by his verbosity having almost shaded the main thought.


It became obvious that his intention is not to let me to pronounce even a single word, to end his monologue, and to go away (to disappear). Understanding this, I made an attempt to interrupt him before he leaves the room, but he did not stop his fountain of words, repeating the same already 3 times.


So, I had no choice, but to interrupt him (very politely) again, forcing him into a conversational mode. I said that Dr. El-Hakim is indeed a wonderful doctor and a nice man, but - for some reasons - I can not go to Point-Claire, especially in the winter time, and I already explained to the intern, why. Besides, I added, Dr. El-Hakim is very sick, and not able to follow not Point-Claire patients; so, after very tremendous urological dramas and 2 operations, I was left without a specialist-urologist.


Reacting to my objections, Dr. Fahmy stressed then that, to his knowledge, I was a patient of Dr. Morris, and, therefore, I MUST return to him, if Dr. El-Hakim is not following me anymore.


The words of Dr. Fahmy solidly confirmed the conspiracy's existence, proving that I became an object of tyrannical medical repressions because of Dr. Morris's intrigues inside the medical community, or because of Dr. Morris's role, functions, and value for the government.


I responded that I don't want to discuss personal qualities of Dr. Morris, but I am not a slave to be attached to Dr. Morris forever, and, because of a conflict with Dr. Morris, I can not put my life in danger by becoming his patient again.


If we live in a lucid democratic society, I stressed, not in a horrific cannibalistic tyrannical dictatorship, I have a basic right not to be forced to a doctor, whom I fear and whom I don't trust.


And I told Dr. Fahmy that, if he does not want me as a patient, he is obliged to refer me to another urologist.


I added that, if Dr. Fahmy is a urinal tract calcification expert, I need exactly such a specialist, because my greatest concern is about an eventual recurrent calcification of the uterus and the bladder, and about formation of kidney stones, and I am asking just for another ultrasound, because (which I also explained to the intern) the last ultrasound (5 May 2019) was not properly performed and analyzed (it just copied the text of the previous US done in the same radiology word for word).


After my explanation, Dr. Farmy said: "Every X-Ray increases chances of cancer considerably".


This was twice a ridiculous statement: 1) he blatantly changed the topic, escaping the discussion about his illegal refusal to except me as his patient; 2) one might think that all the X-Rays (and, first of all, dental) are already abolished! But it was just a small portion of the distortion. I stressed that I am asking not for an X-Ray, but for an ultrasound, to what Dr. Fahmy responded: "You know, we are working with the government, and all money are coming from the government. We are not allowed to send a patient with no private insurance to a procedure, which costs 2 thousand dollars. And I am not the right person, who can justify such huge expenses".


Another bizarre declaration (ethically and factually).


And, again, another evident that my medical ordeals are extremely politisized and linked to my former Immigration case, because Dr. Fahmy was saying such outraged things, which only Dr. Morris was saying, and because such statement is absolutely surreal for Canada.


I disputed his statement, arguing that more than 3 years after the bladder stones removal surgery - it is time to be checked for recurrence, and no justification is needed.


Dr. Fahmy made a short laughter: "You know, what are bladder stones? It is like a baby in a woman, which you can not ignore; you would notice a bladder stone instantly." Is was absolutely ridiculous, especially for me: a person, who had asymptomatic bladder stones for (as minimum) 1,5 years, and I said that 1) not a patient, but a doctor knows the diagnose; 2) in term to notice an urolithic disease, a patient must be fully aware about the bladder stones" symptoms; 3) distinguish them from other UT disorders; 4) sometimes the bladder stones go asymptomatic.


Dr. Fahmy was already on his feet, hastened to the exit, but responded, that, anyway, he's not a great expert for the bladder stones, but only a specialist for kidney stones (in contradiction with his previous statement that he's a bladder / kidney stones specialist).


Because he was already near the door, I could only manage to ask, what about the kidney stones, and he said that the US result, which I have presented, does not mention kidney stones, and that "a cyst is not a stone".


I quickly responded that this is just another indication that this was a "fake" US, because other ultrasounds and CT scan found Bl. Stones.


However, they both just ignored my words, and Dr. Fahmy added that I must go to my family doctor, who may issue a referral to an ultrasound.


When he left, I wondered, why the intern very meticulously examined me, asking innumerous questions about the symptoms, and writing down everything very precisely, if they were about to reject me as a patient?


This question has only one answer: the government and its secret services want to know everything objectively about my health problems, but not for my treatment, not for rendering a right medical help to me: no, on the contrary! - to know how to destroy me.


10 Dec 2019

The appointment with Dr. Schultz, scheduled at 9.00, was cancelled by his secretary, and transferred to 19 Dec 2019.


19 Dec 2019

At 9.00 I supposed to see Dr. Schultz, but the waiting time lasted around 2 hours.

This time Dr. Schultz just admitted that one of the tests has vanished somewhere, and another test did not reveal the roots of arthritis.

This was a very first fruitless appointment with Dr. Schultz, but it was not his guilt.

He renewed Celebrex, and prescribed Lirica pain killer, which I ignored and never used.


++++++++++++++


Lev Gunin


THE PUNITIVE HEALTH CARE

[HEALTH CARE AS A REPRESSIVE TOOL]


BOOK 5-13


THE UROLOGICAL DRAMA. PART 13.


CONTENT


CHAPTER 1. January-February, 2020.

CHAPTER 2. March-May, 2020.

CHAPTER 3. June-December 2020.

CHAPTER 4. March-December 2021.

CHAPTER 5. January-December 2022.

CHAPTER 6. January-February 2023.


_________


* * *


The whole text of the chronological events and medical documents (under the name of "The Punitive Health Care - (Health Care as a Repressive Tool)" is available for examination only on the basis of the following contract between the author and the reader:


I (THE READER) GIVE MY CONSENT THAT, BY CLICKING CORRESPONDING LINKS AND ACCESSING THE TEXT OF "THE PUNITIVE HEALTH CARE", I AUTOMATICALLY AGREE TO THE FOLLOWING PRELIMINARY CONDITIONS [FOR READING]:


-- I am (at least) 18 years old.


1. I (the reader) is undertaking (commit myself) not to distribute the text of "The Punitive Health Care - (Health Care as a Repressive Tool)" - entirely, or in fragments; not to copy medical documents; and not to share the text and images without author' permission.


2. I (the reader) understand that the confidential information, which is contained in this text, cannot be used for any other [than the reading (extraneous; secondary)] purposes and needs, for any researches, essays, stories, etc.


3. I (the reader) commit myself not to sneer at open ticklish personal information (which sharing was induced by circumstances), not to savor any medical, physiological, or anatomic details, and not to use this text as a reason for mockery and persecution.


4. I (the reader) am warned by the author that, except for a number of obviously immoral (by definition) doctors' and medical staff's actions, other decisions and acts described in this "confession" are not subjected to hasty moral assessment because a) only experts can judge finally about their justification and fairness; b) explanations and vindications of other party are necessary. We also do not know to what degree the doctors were under an influence and direct power of police, Ministry of Immigration, and other enforcement agencies, political organizations, groups and persons - with their own ideological, economic, and propaganda interests, - and to what degree this influence impacted on their diagnostic conclusions and assessments of patient's state of health. Many of the documentary confirmed facts incontestably demonstrate that author's ideological stand (who's opposing to younger generation's transformation into zombie-biorobots with mobile phones on shoulders instead of heads; to electronic totalitarianism with its prison-like total video surveillance; and to the tyrannical political censorship) played nearly a major role in enraging the authorities and triggering the persecutions.


5. I (the reader) am warned that the author sees the main cause of the most dramatic (for him) events in the fact that the enforcement agencies and interested persons and groups managed to present him to the medical community as an individual incapable to evaluate his health condition objectively; as a health-consciousan (or hypochondriac); an extremist; a troublemaker; an individual obsessed with panic and alarm patterns; as a person, who is making unreal demands to the system of medical care - concerning his - allegedly - pseudo-maladies and exaggerated gravity of trivial indispositions. This smear campaign of defamation, scurrilous libel, and wicked calumny made impossible receiving an adequate medical care (and sometimes any medical help at all), and led to health undermining, numerous diseases, incidents, and unnecessary sufferings. Doctors also considered difficult to believe in continuous (not connected with each other) illnesses, with an interval of 4-7 days, sometimes rolling at the same time: as tsunami. They refused to believe in these sequences of illnesses' painful course, danger, and significance. This chronicle disproves such a prejudiced opinion, producing an incontestable evidence.


6. I (the reader) am informed that all negative remarks, characteristics, and facts' assessments belong only to the portrayal of criminal groups, extremists, and carriers of anti-humanistic, racist, and totalitarian ideology, but do not contain groundless generalizations and negative assessment of any country, ethnic group, or religion. The author is categorically against dismantling of any of the existing states, and against restrictions of the rights of religious congregations of any faith.


7. I (the reader) am informed that this edition partially presents the previous 2017 edition without any changes, and, thus, may not correspond to later view and opinions.


8. I (the English reader) am informed that some parts of the following English text of "The Punitive Health Care" - were translated from Polish, Russian, or French originals, and may contain primitive language, double interpretation, or puzzled meaning. Such confusing fragments should be compared with their originals in Polish and Russian languages (author's native languages) [2016-2017]; all controversial points must be resolved through such a comparison.


9. In the very last moment of this edition's make-up (April 2023), the author came across a description of so-called Havana-syndrome, and found same symptoms and complications, which he experienced when was attacked by an unknown remote weapon (3 Nov. 2005, 7 Jan. 2013, and 21 June 2016), and developed symptoms of post-microwave irradiation.


_________


CHAPTER 1. January-February, 2020.


2020


January, 2020.


6 Jan 2020, Monday

Today the governmental tortures (as I call the denial of dental services for people of low income in Canada) continued. If I could afford the normal dental services, or the dental care was covered by a public health care: I could just repair 2 last left teeth, without the need to remove them. However, an only option to solve the problem was an extraction surgery.


So, I had an appointment (scheduled at 13.00) with Dr. Roi - the dentist, who now is working at 4941 Welington (SOS Sourire Clinique; tel. 514-544-4441).


This operation has also passed with great difficulties, lasted more than 1 and a half hours, and required 2 gum cuts and crumbling the teeth into pieces.


After my very bad experience at 3 different places, there is a grounded suspicion that I have enormously firm (strong) teeth.


In 2 hours after the surgery of the left lower teeth removal (6 January, 2020) I was affected by an enormous pain:

1) left side of the head;

2) left ear (also blocked 1 h. after the surgery);

3) lymph node (also swollen, harden);

4) left side of the jaw.


5 p.m.: difficult to swallow; problems with respiration.

7 p.m.: my wife called Info-Sante; 1,5 h. waiting: no response.

4. 8 p.m.: she called S.O.S. Sourire: no dentist was there; I was given an appointment for 7/1/2020 (10:30).

5. 8:15 p.m.: I took Novo-Profen (3 pills left, already expired); great relief in 30 min; took Vitamin C; applied warm scarf; etc.


7 Jan 2020, Tuesday

8:40 a.m.: no Novo-Profen left; the situation has worsened again (lymph node more painful; the cheek more swollen; sharp pain (like an electric shock), when even a liquid like water gets on the left side; a strip of soft tissue (the tissue with stitches?) hanging between the teeth; etc.).

10:30: On my request to issue Azithromycin and Novo-Profen, Dr. P. Aziz prescribed only Azithromycin.

13:00. I took 2 pills of Azithromycin, but the situation was worsening again, in spite of rinsing with soda+salt, applying warm scarf, etc., etc., etc.


The whole day and 2 sleepless nights the pain was still increasing (Tylenol did not help); the area of painful jaw widening; aching when swallowing - more tormenting; opening the mouth more painful; and the lymph node hurting more.


8 Jan 2020, Wednesday

Pain of the left skull (behind the left ear) and pain of the left ear returned.


I detected now the stitches between the 2-nd & 3-rd molars.


The abscess and hardening in the cheek corresponds to this exactly area.


For me, a dilettante, this looks weird: why the stitches not in the gum that covers the extracted wisdom tooth, but 1-2 teeth far away to the center.


The area of pain in the lower dental arch have been widened, in spite of antibiotic.


Most of the pain was now coming not from the site of operation (complicated wisdom tooth extraction with the surgical cuts and many stitched), but from this abscess from the 2-nd molar to the canine, and from the soft tissue behind and higher than the operation site (where 2 dental arched are connected, including retromolar pod; maxillary tiberosity; anterior pillar; etc.): i.e. from the soft and hard parts of the palate & the throat.


Around 11:38, I called S.O.S. Sourire, and described the situation to Dr. Roi, who escaped from his obligation to see me and examine the problem physically, and prescribed the Novo-Profen and Codeine instead. He faxed it to the farmacy.


I don't blame Dr. Roi, because I suspect that the sadistic System just did not leave him a choice.


In spite of the pain and not being well, I went to the pharmacy to obtain the medications. However, I could not afford buying Codeine.


8 Jan 2020, Thursday

I discovered that massaging and applying a tender pressure to the abscess makes it softer and smaller, which means that there is an accumulating infiltrate inside there.


I also discovered that the stitches are present between the 2-nd and 3-rd molder, and between the 2-nd and 3-rd molder: 2 teeth after the surgery site.


What Dr. Roi and his Asiatic partner-assistant (who have an impression of more than an assistant) sewed up there? A friend, who used to work as a dentist's assistant in his native Latin American country (and whom I described my torments), joked that the doctors have inserted a tracing device (location indicator (to enable police and special services to know my location), or a transmitter, blue ray AND a tapping device (that sends the audio to a remote receiver), or something similar.


Never before dentists operated from the right and then from the left (Dr. Roi stood up - and went to the left side (on my left side) in the middle of the surgery).


25 Jul 2019, Thursday

At 10.10 I supposed to see Dr. Viviott, but her secretary transferred the appointment to January 28, 11.30.


27 Jan 2020, Monday

Because of the ongoing dental infection and dental surgery complications, I had to see Dr. Roi again (by schedule - at 11.00).


28 Jan 2020, Tuesday

The appointment with Dr. Viviott (Point-Claire, 955 St.-Jean boul. (near boul. Brunswick, Tel.: 461-3929) was scheduled at 11.30. Her secretary (a very compassionate and good women) wanted to transfer my file to NDG Clinic - Tel. 514-228-8889, - but something went wrong. Only much later I understood what's the matter, and why Dr. Viviott and her secretary tried to transfer my file.


Dr. Viviott has refused to remove problematic lesions; told that the less expensive operation on the back will cost around 100 dollars.


I did not DEMAND to remove it; I just asked her, if it is dangerous.


First, I thought that she said "it is dangerous" demanding 100 dollars for removal.


Later I started to doubt that heard correctly what she said (due to my hearing problems). Maybe she said that it is NOT dangerous. However, if this lesion is not problematic, and poses no danger: why should she raise a question about the removal, and demanded 100 dollars (we also discussed the price and my inability to pay the "ranson"). Meanwhile, the lesion on the back is becoming more and more annoying and dangerous.


Only 6 or 8 months later I learned that this clinic has changed its status, and became private, and this explained, why such a kindhearted and conscious doctor as Dr. Viviott was forced to deny an absolutely necessary - from the medical point of view - lesion's removal.


After my visit to Dr. Viviott - the irritated, bleeding lesion inflamed (next day). I began

to apply iodine.


FEBRUARY 2020


6 Feb 2020 (Thursday)

13:30 (1:30 p.m.) - Ultrasound at Montreal General Hospital was clearly summarized to downplay the worrisome aggravating changes, which reverse the results of 2 surgeries:


The denial of the urological care in this situation must be regarded as a serious medical crime.


15-16 Feb. 2020

Having no doubts that Dr. Lesk is a good man and an excellent specialist (just not as brave as Dr. Saheb in opposing the System's cruelty), I am - at the same time - sure that the medical authorities have blocked to him all most important opportunities to provide for me the most efficient ophthalmological care.


Being sure that Dr. Lesk, at least, will never inflict any harm to me, and that he is an ethically sane person, I am, at the same time, morally distressed by his attempts to cover up the government - by downplaying the gravity of my vision's problems.


Besides, the hospital is systematically blocking and canceling my appointment with Dr. Lesk, and I consider this - the main factor of the next near tragic glaucoma attack, which could make me blind.


Left eye's significant hemorrhage forced me to go to Hopital Maisonneuve-Rosemont Emergency Room, where I spent most of Saturday - Sunday, 15-16 February, 2020.


I came 15 min. to midnight; and around 3 a.m. the IOP was checked (in the Emergency Department), which was - 22 left eye, and 25 right eye.


This crisis points to the gravity of my situation against the background of an inadequate medical help.


19 Feb 2020, Wednesday

Another tragedy is my hearing drastic degeneration, which is a "capital punishment" for creativity of musicians like me.


I explain why my hearing has degraded in a special part called "Who Destroyed My Vision and Hearing". But during a period, when my hearing still could be restored, doctors and the medical system have sabotaged all medical measures, which could help.


At 15:00, I had another (the 2-nd) Audiology test at Royal Victoria Hospital at room E4.02.


This test has confirmed the further worsening, but I was denied even the hearing aid, not speaking about restoring my hearing, which was still possible.


After this procedure I went to SOS-Sourire dental clinic, where I left the "prestation" from Welfare for dental partial prosthesis. However, I knew that it is impossible for me to wear the dentures, because of the horrific multiple traumas, which dentists inflicted, including the broken skull. As later was confirmed, no dentures can fit me due to this reason.


Both solutions - surgery for repairing the skull and alveolar bones' injuries, or teeth full and adequate treatment to prevent further teeth loss - are not available for me because of inhuman outraged costs in Canada of dental services.


20 Feb 2020

I had another appointment at Ophthalmology Department at Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital: follow-up after Emergency. (See the details in: "Who Destroyed My Vision and Hearing").


21 Feb. 2020 (Friday)

At 8.30 - I visited my family doctor (Dr. Rohan) about the lesion on my back.


He was terrified by the view of bleeding and badly looking huge lesion, and indignant that Dr. Viviott refused to remove this lesion, demanding 100 dollars for this procedure.


But especially he was revolted that Dr. Viviott did not tell to me where to go, and what to do, if I cannot pay 100 dollars.


However (running forward), later I found out that Dr. Viviott was a hostage of clinic's new administration and clinic's privatization by human monsters.


So, Dr. Rohan arranged an appointment for me with Dr. Wang for Feb. 26.


25 Feb. 2020, Tue.

As I already wrote on 29 Oct. 2019, severe complications after a flu have affected my hearing, and the Metro-Medic clinic sent me to another otolaryngologist in a very far away ORL clinic, located at 2155 rue St. Luis, ville St.-Laurent (bus 128) (tel.: 514-312-9952; fax: 514-744-8314. 2155; contact@lscentremedical.com).


But, as I discovered later, this clinic appeared to be one of the innumerous bogus-public clinics, which receive public funds, but actually works as a private clinic, treating patients only for money. Such clinics are converted into private sector institutions (just nominally - deceptively - keeping the status of "public" medical facilities), but, actually, are "reconfigured" not for medical help, but just for money extortion.


This is the most massive and the most outraged fraud: the formation of thousands of similar bogus-clinics, which suck public money, but work for private patients.


My appointment at 13:30 was completely fruitless. I merely lost a lot of time, because Dr. Rachel Levy was there exclusively for money extortion, not for rendering medical help.


26 Feb 2020, Wedn.

My appointment with Dr. Wang (Tel. 514-788-3202) was scheduled for 9:15.


In spite of Dr. Rohan's dramatic letter to Dr. Wang, she did not remove the lesion on my back (which was bleeding and looked terribly).


Actually, she was ready to remove it right away (after seeing it), but demanded 300 (or 30?) dollars for this procedure. Maybe, I misheard the sum, but, anyway, if Dr. Wang followed the protocol, which demands to perform any medical procedure for free if there is a medical necessity, the things would not turn out so dramatically.


Only when I said that I am not able to pay, she refused to do it, because did not want to do it for free.


I complained that - when I am leaning (while sitting), or laying on my back, - this tag becomes red, painful, sometimes inflamed, and I must treat it by iodine.


Then, how can I dry my skin after a shower, if any contact with a towel provokes this lesion's bleeding?


My explanations did not catch Dr. Wang's heart, and did not change Dr. Wang's mind; she claimed only that it is not dangerous, and that I should merely avoid scratching or touching it, or occasionally damaging it, and should not cut it under no circumstances, because then it becomes "a great problem". When I demanded to explain what is "a great problem", she said that it could become "not benign".


She even applied a peace of plaster to the lesion to protect it from any damage. Obviously, her warnings and the plaster contradict her claim that the lesion is not dangerous. If there are no risks: then why so many warnings, and why the plaster?


Dr. Wang also told that the lesion will probably fall down by itself, but did not say for sure.


However, the plaster did nothing good, because made skin to fold, causing pressure to the lesion. One of plaster's corners came off, detaching the corresponding peace of the lesion, and it began bleeding again. I had to remove the plaster; a cream (medication) was on its internal side. The plaster did the situation even worse, and now it became even more dramatic.


Here I must specify - what else contributed to my degrading health situation (besides the "medical terror"; police intimidation; 3 attacks by a remote microwave weapon; staged attacks by "unknown hooligans" and "accidents"; provocations; administrative repressions; etc.). There is an additional reason of my multiple health problems and the need to see doctors more frequently.


Since 2013, there were a number of endless constructions around us. Streets and roads renovations works, new condos constructions, and an old commercial building rebuilding into a huge Google office right across the street: all these activities were accompanied by extreme noise and by imprudent violations of all safety and noise codes and restrictions.


The construction mafia used to start the extreme noise at 5-6 in the morning, and sometimes they ended their noisy work at 23.00.


They financed informers and provocateurs in our local small neighborhood, who aggressively suffocated all talks among our neighbors about a possible class-action or public complaint.


Ones, when one of my neighbors called the police, complaining about the noise after 23.00, someone warned the construction workers (probably, another neighbor (a payable agent for the construction mafia), or, maybe, working for the construction mafia police officer), and, when police came in just 10 minutes, the construction site was all calm.


We could not sleep, and the constant noise has played on our nerves as affectively as the most vicious tortures.


It is known very well that residents' exposure to permanent noise is causing cardio-vascular and endocrinology problems, because human body unconsciously react to the excessive permanent noise by undesirable syndromes. Plus, the noise (especially on the Google construction site) was 2-3 times louder than the most liberal (for construction firms) restrictions.


Together with the noise, the pollution has reigned supreme...


Like the tobacco companies, which were forced to pay compensations to poisoned - by them - victims, noise and pollution producers; landlords, who actually robbing and killing their tenants; employers, who exploit their workers without paying them enough money for even physical survival; doctors, who, by refusing to provide needed medical help, actually killing their patients or destroy their health, forcing their victims to turn to emergency rooms and to other medical professionals 100 times more frequent; industry lords, who pollute cities by toxic wastes; financial mafia, which suck blood from people, plunging them into extreme poverty and destroying their lives; politicians, which drive Montreal's population out of the city, provoking the need in dozens of additional highways and railways, destroying rural areas and forests; the elite, which deprive the biggest part of the population of basic rights and needs like food and roof: all of them contribute to the catastrophic decline of healthy population, and they should pay the bills for medical services.


CHAPTER 2. March-May 2020.


March, 2020.


9-10 mar 2020

Around midnight, I fell from the icy metal back stairs.


Injuries: hand fracture; buttock's (especially, on the right side) giant hematoma (in 1 hour after the accident) with the huge swelling; bruise of the coxofemoral higher bones; trauma of the spinal column. The right hand damage (cartilage, cuts, & fracture) did not allow to apply ice to the buttock; the ice was applied only to the hand.


While (as, after analyzing the whole tragic sequence, I much later concluded) the whole "accident" was a staged attempt on my life, I could still avoid the injuries, or, at least, the most damaging consequences, if not my inadequate reaction, caused by stress and despair after Dr. Wang's and Dr. Viviott's refusal to remove the bleeding, dangerous, terribly looking and annoying lesion on my back.


See the photo of this lesion below:


I consider the role of the lesion's removal denial the major factor of the falling tragedy, and two doctors' decision to refuse its removal the cause of the fall.


The more detailed explanation of obvious link between the denial of lesion's removal - and my fall - is presented in the special part of this work called "The Mistreatment of my Injuries".


However, if Dr. Viviott compassionately reacted to my reproaches (when, later, in another wave of desperation, I sent her a message), trying to do everything possible to compensate the damage inflicted to me by the sadistic medical System (and, first of all, removed the problematic lesion), Dr. Wang reacted aggressively and by warning not to approach her anymore, never.


Meanwhile, after being properly and kindly treated by 3 francophone doctors and other medical workers in Verdun Hospital's Emergency Department, I was discriminated, mistreated, and taunted by the doctor and by the administration staff in Verdun Hospital's outpatient's clinic.


With my tremendous injuries, they kept me in the corridor 5 or 6 hours (in addition to 4 hours, already spent in the Emergency Department [the secretaries, the doctor, and other medical workers perfectly knew - when I arrived to the hospital from the papers], knowing that sitting in the hard seat in the waiting room is a real torture with my injuries; they refused to provide Tylenol and ice; they forced me to wait longer than any other person (with or without injuries, or without any other fresh or acute traumas), who came 1, 2, 3, or 4 hours after me; and they reacted extremely aggressively and with an insult to my inquiry about the clinic's internal rules of the queue order and priority. Instead of giving ANY explanation - why I am kept longer than anyone else, and not called to the doctor, when all patients, who came after me, were assessed by the doctor and left home.


Some people came with an appointment, and they were called into rooms without long waiting hours. Some people came from the Emergency Room, and they also were called relatively soon (within 1-1,5 hours), while I was kept on the corridor till 18:00 or 18:30. I was called in shortly before the closure of the clinic.


The cast's application was laid not properly, and I had later tremendous problems.


I was sent home without ultrasound, surgical drainage of the huge hematoma swelling, medications, or cream, or therapy procedures; without follow ups; they only gave me a referral to CLSC for hematom's follow up "in 1 or 2 weeks".


The detailed description of my new ordeal is given in the special part (series) of this work called "The Mistreatment of my Injuries".


11 mar 2020

Because of doctors' refusal to remove the lesion on my back I got the injuries (see "The Mistreatment of my Injuries"), and - because of the injuries - I had to cancel a very needed appointment with - Dr. Roi at 11.30.


12 Mar 2020 Jeudi / Thursday

Because of doctors' refusal to remove the lesion on my back I got the injuries (see "The Mistreatment of my Injuries"), and - because of the injuries - I had to cancel a crucial appointment with Dr. Lesk at 9.30.


13 Mar 2020 - Friday

Due to my injuries, I had to cancel my meeting with friends at 11.00.


17 Mar 2020 - Tuesday

At CLSC (I was there at 9.10), they also mocked on me, kept me waiting almost 3 hours, and denied any help.


People, who came after me, were called before me.


The doctor did nothing regarding my complains about the giant swelling hematoma (which, after 1 week, continued to swell more and more) and inappropriate dangerous cast application, which stopped a normal blood circulation. My complains about the lesions were also ignored.


Besides the mistreatment in this CLSC, it was the guilt of Dr. Gdalewicz (the osteo-specialist from Verdun Hospital, who assessed me after the accident in the outpatients' clinic), who should not kick me out to CLSC, but to issue a follow up appointment in Verdun Hospital.


See the details in "The Mistreatment of my Injuries".


APRiL 2020


3 Apr. 2020

On my request, my family doctor (Dr. Rohan) called me at 9.15.


I discussed with him the possibility of replacing the plaster, or to remove it completely, explaining that with each day the cast is pressing more and more, threatening to inflict bones deformation, displacement of the pieces of the fracture, irreversible vascular damage, etc.


This was in his competence. However, Dr. Rohan has issued an X-Ray requisition, which was (at first) refused by Dr. Gdalewicz (Gdalevitch).


9 April 2020 (Thursday)

The situation with the plaster became more alarming and urgent.


During 4 weeks since I was wearing the cast, Doctor Gdalewicz (Gdalevitch) was refusing to arrange an organized and linked to a normal scheduled appointment plaster's (cast's) replacement, ignoring my complains about it's bad application and abnormal pressure on my arm and hand.


I tried to go around Dr. Gdalevitch, and to get an appointment with the hospital for plaster's removal, but the hospital disregarded the alarming situation, or offered plaster's removal on practically impossible conditions and without any assessment of the need to replace the plaster by a similar one, or by an orthopedic support, without an X-Ray, etc.


So, on 9 April 2020 there developed an emergency situation.


The fingers became just enormously swollen; plaster"s pressure on the wrist became so intensive that blocked the blood circulation completely; etc.


Because I had no time to go to emergency, I removed the plaster myself around 19:30, which was an extremely complicated, dangerous, and difficult procedure.


The whole responsibility of potential injuries, complications, and other undesirable consequences bears Dr. Gdalevitch, CLSC in Verdun, and Verdun Hospital.


I was forced to remove the plaster 2 or 4 weeks (it should be further discussed with Dr. Gdalevitch) prior to its suggested (by the doctor) removal, which could end in a potential irreversible damage to the hand.


I was just lucky of successfully removing the plaster without any undesirable consequences, despite its type, which is the hardest for removal, and normally can be detached only by experienced medical specialists, and only by special tools.


10 Apr. 2020

10 April 2020 (Friday) my family doctor sent me a referral for an X-Ray, and I did it same day at 1 of only 2 or 3 still open (during Covid) radiology in the city: Cote des Neiges Radiological Center.


When I came (booking an appointment in advance), one of the secretaries told me that she did not find my name anywhere, and that I must go home: because I, allegedly, have no appointment, and, so, will not be allowed to do the X-Ray.


She just refused to listen my statement that I BOOKED an appointment, and that, besides, an X-Ray is not an ultrasound, and must be done even without an appointment, according to the law.


Then another secretary came in, and, hearing the end of the dispute, quickly found my name and the inscription of my appointment.


Running forward: the same "1-st" secretary (nearly low white woman - possibly, a Quebecer - normal body shape, in her late 40-s or mid 50-s) did the same trick 3 more times during next 2 years, and, eventually, works as an informer and provocateur for some governmental circles.


Comparing the images of the Emergency X-Ray (10 March 2020) and the Cote des Neiges Radiological Center (10 April 2020), we can see that - before the plaster - the swelling (watch the contour) was much smaller, and was concentrated mostly (if not only) in the fracture area itself, while - after the plaster - the swelling is much bigger, and includes the whole hand, the wrist, and all the fingers.


The digit number 2 and the digit number 5 (little finger) are especially affected after the plaster, and are bent (especially the little finger). Deminerilisation and degenerative arthrosis was not an issue before the plaster. The healing of the fracture shows a small displacement under the plaster, and the direction changing by the broken-away piece.


All my suspicions have proven to be true: the fracture did not heal, but was in the middle of healing. I put then a light orthopedic support, which I ordered over Internet, and did some additional measures to prevent any possible damage to not completely healed fracture.


14 Apr. 2020

An appointment with Dr. Gdalevitch (scheduled at 8.30) - was fruitless.


She did nothing for me, nor regarding the treatment of the horrific hematomas, nor for the treatment of the consequences of the damage, left by - still non-healed! - fracture, and by badly laid inappropriate plaster.


She did not issue the follow ups, did not administrate a compensative physiotherapy, and even did not provide an orthopedic support for the right hand.


She sent me for another X-Ray, but refused to compare it with the X-Ray, which I did 4 days ago. However, what I saw on the computer screen is that - during 6 days without plaster - the fracture healed faster than during the whole entire month with the plaster. I also noticed that, in comparison with the X-Ray done on 10 Mar. 2020 (which I already managed to obtain from the archive), there were some worsening: likely, due to the damage inflicted by the bad plaster"s alignment. Initially, before the plaster's application the fracture was without any displacement; however, now the pieces of the fractured bone were a bit apart - the plaster, which supposed to protect the hand and prevent any displacement, did the opposite: just made the fracture even worse.


Probably, this is why Dr. Gdalevitch unethically refused to comment about the details of the X-Ray in comparison to 10 Mar. 2020 X-Ray, and later blocked me an access to radiologist"s report. However, in June 2020, I managed to go around this blockade, and obtained the radiologist"s report (14 Apr. 2020):


"Constatations radiologiques :


"On compare aux radiographies du 10 mars 2020.


Statut post-fracture oblique de la diaphyse moyenne du 5" métacarpe.


Alignement inchangé, avec léger déplacement dorsal du fragment distal et léger raccourcissement d'axe.


Progression d'une consolidation osseuse qui est d'aspect avancé mais encore incomplète."


There is a non-doubtful evidence that a fracture WITHOUT any displacement became AFTER the plaster a fracture WITH a displacement.


Dr. Gdalevitch saw that I am not capable to move my fingers; to bend them; to unbend them; and that the little finger is destroyed, enormously swollen at the last proximal phalanx; that the external part of my palm is very swollen; and that all the wrist"s bones are dysfunctional. However, she did not examine my little finger or my hand by palpation (she only pressed on the fracture site to verify the pain level), she did not try to test the articulation of the digits, and she did not perform anything in exception of looking into the X-Ray images.


I am not a specialist, but I guess that there were few possibilities for further procedures: 1) to put another plaster; 2) to put on a lighter PROFESSIONAL orthopedic support; 3) to do a surgical procedure (operation); 4) to do additional exams and tests (ultrasound, EMR, etc.).


But Dr. Gdalevitch told nothing about the condition of my hand, about the situation and the prognosis, or about possible options, perhaps, because, 1) my hand was in such a condition that it was problematic to put on another plaster (some time was needed for the hand to recover); 2) an orthopedic device (not a plaster) is reserved for commercial patients only; 3) a surgery is risky in my situation, and also could throw a shadow on how my fracture was managed; 4) additional exams were ruled out because would compromise the cover-up attempts.


However, finally (in the end of the rendezvous), she capitulated to my demands - and gave me a referral to physiotherapy: not because it was a favor or a concession to my demands, but simply because it was an easier way out. Her referral to physiotherapy was written so unintelligibly that it was hard to tell if it was restricted exclusively by the right little finger, or included other parts of the hand. But, judging by the physiotherapist reaction, who was surprised or even shocked (for unknown reasons) by Dr. Gdalevitch's referral, it is quite possible. She also told me to do all possible exercises for the right hand, which I questioned because the fracture did not heal yet, and because of the condition of the little finger.


(See more details in "The Mistreatment of my Injuries").


21 Apr. 2020

Another appointment with Dr. Gdalevitch - was fruitless.


She did nothing else for me (besides a referral to physiotherapy), starting from the horrific hematomas, ending with the consequences of the badly laid inappropriate plaster. (See the details in "The Mistreatment of my Injuries").


22 Apr. 2020

In spite of my declaration that I already lost an appointment with Dr. Lesk, due to serious traumas, the hospital cancelled my appointment with Dr. Lesk (scheduled at 9.30), without the date of the next appointment.


Formally and actually, it means that I was cut off the ophthalmological care in situation of the most critical and dangerous for my vision period, when I can completely lose my sight. By cancelling the appointment with Dr. Lesk - when not rescheduling it to another date, - these monsters sent me a signal that I am not welcomed or even expelled from this clinic.


24 Apr. 2020

I supposed to have a full ultrasound test of all most affected areas by the injuries parts of my body at 11:00, at Radimed Westmount Lab, but they did ONLY the right hand scan (metacarpia-5) - and ONLY a small area!


In the "The Mistreatment of my Injuries" (see in this work) I give the detailed description of Radimed's administration's conspiracy with the authorities for blocking me an access to full (mentioned in the requisition) exam, and to its results.


29 Apr. 2020

At 8:30 I supposed to pass an ultrasound of the whole injured buttock and hand - but Radimed's administration has unlawfully blocked me an access to the correct exam.


In the "The Mistreatment of my Injuries" (see in this work) I give the detailed description of Radimed Westmount's administration's conspiracy with the authorities for blocking me an access to full (mentioned in the requisition) exam, and to its results.


Both Montreal General Hospital and Royal Victoria Hospital merely sabotaged my appeal for the physiotherapy and my fax with Dr. Gdalevitch's referral: just like the St.-Mary's Hospital never provided a physiotherapy referred by Dr. Schultz.


My communication with both hospitals in writing and via phone lasted 2 weeks, till, finally, both hospitals have made clear that I'll never receive a course of a physiotherapy there.


30 Apr. 2020 Thursday

At 11:00, I received a call from Verdun Hospital's Physiotherapy Department (Tel. 514-362-1000).


The format and the method of this so-called "physiotherapy" was an insult.


They insisted that exclusively a "telephone" physiotherapy" is available, without inquiring if I have a proper phone equipment, an adequate hearing, etc.


A women-physiotherapist made a lot of efforts to provide any help for me, but it was impossible because of my impartial hearing, my old and audiologically unsuitable phone, and due to a number of other factors.


Attempts to communicate in English or French did not bring any positive results, in spite of my perfect English and quite good French. The suggestions that the communication with me via phone does not work because I am not capable to understand the instructions - were also discriminatory: simplifying the truth.


Then they offered a video format: again, without consulting me - and without finding out if I have a proper equipment for that, an appropriate computer knowledge, a corresponding video communication device, etc.


At 18:00 the front door opened and then slammed. I was in the bedroom, and thought that it was my wife. I called her right away, but she said she is far away from home.


MAY 2020


6 May 2020

In spite the offer of video-conference, I received a simple phone call again - at 13:00 - from Verdun Hospital's Physiotherapy department.


Besides the problem with communication, there was another problem: I already knew and tried almost everything that the physiotherapist was telling, but it did not help. Maybe, I just exercised not properly, but to improve it I had to see the physiotherapist personally, not speaking with her on the phone.


I consider a compulsory "phone rendezvous" a real hospitals' sabotage of medical services. Only people, who agree voluntarily for this format should be given this option.


11 MAY 2020

I sent a message to Dr. Viviott, in which stated - among other things:


"Dear Dr. Viviott!

On 28 Jan. 2020 (Tuesday), 11:30, I came to you with 4 main problems: 1) growing convex nevus on the r. clavicle; 2) alleged angioma on the l. side of the face; 2) cyst on the middle of vertebrae; 3) painful & bleeding acrocordon (tag) on the r. s. of my back. I asked to remove them or to refer me to a specialist who can do it".


Then I reminded that received a refusal, and continued:


"In 2 weeks the tag became horrifying, changing shape & color.

In the end of Feb, 2020, I had an appointment with another dermatologist, who also demanded money for lesions" removal. She promised that the tag will "fall down by itself".

However, the tag never fell down, but began to regenerate into potentially malicious lesion. Another lesion began to grow on top of above mentioned quickly expanding nevus.

Alleged angioma has multiplied in 2 lesions.

The cyst stopped to shrink in response to warm compresses [the academic literature suggests an obligatory removal of ANY lesion on top of the vertebrae (before it calcifies, becomes non-manageable, etc.)].

New uncommon lesions began to appear in different areas.

Around midnight, 9-10 March, 2020, being preoccupied by the worries about the skin lesions, I was not able to assess the weather conditions, and fell down icy stairs, getting a fracture and other dangerous injuries.

I believe: it happened due to my reaction to the refusal to treat my skin pathologies".

(...)


Right after sending this fax I received a call from the social housing (16:02) 514-868-4812, Marie. The connection is obvious. Theoretically (it not true in real life), social housing could leave more money for medical needs. It is a prove that all my calls, emails and faxes are monitored and the information is sent to one place.


13 May 2020, Wednesday

13 may 2020: I talked to my family doctor, Dr. Rohan, by phone (at 10.15).

He gave me a referral to Dr. Sonea, the dermatologist.


On the same day (13 may 2020), the first session of the video-conference of the physiotherapy (scheduled at 13.00) has proved to be the same abuse and mockery.


As I later discovered, it was not the physiotherapists' fault, but it happened due to the cruelty of the System: because Dr. Imar Belarbi turned to be a nice man and a responsible and good professional (when I met him personally face to face).


ZOOM video-conference software is a dangerous and privacy violating program, in my opinion. Besides, a very poor explanation how to use it for medical needs, and, especially, for Verdun Hospital's procedures in particular, and no explanation - how and where to download it, how to install and use it: could leave other computer users (less advanced than myself) in a limbo.


Dr. Belarbi never called in time; he was too early (not in time), or too late with the difference of 1-3 hours! Using a very old laptop, and an instable version of ZOOM - I could not wait with the Zoom software running all the time while waiting for Dr. Imar Belarbi 's calls.


He never said it directly, but hinted that it was not his fault, and, as I can guess, he was put in such conditions and time-frames that could not physically call in time.


Besides, he did not know how to use the Zoom program properly during his communication with such patients as me (considering some sound and video interruptions, etc.), and could not hear me well. On my side, I also could not hear him well (his voice was too quiet or, on the contrary, so loud that could not be understood because of the sound distortion).


He could not understand my explanations that I already used most of the exercises, and that folding and unfolding the right hand's fingers by my left hand in a way, which he proposed, was too painful and too dangerous.


In addition, Dr. Imar Belarbi spent with me on Zoom just 10 minutes, which was absolutely not enough. (The doctor was indicated in my notes as M-e Imar Belarbi, but, considering all hospital's mess and awkwardness during the Covid, it could be another man).


27 May 2020, Wednesday

The second physiotherapy (again scheduled at 13.00) via video-conference was as useless as the first one.


Dr. Imar Belarbi (?) did not understand - how grave, how serious are the complications after the injuries and the harmful damage done by the plaster. He could not assume or did not believe that something similar could happen to a patient, and, consequently, his help was not efficient. Partially, it happened because Dr. Gdalevitch concealed the truth about the real complications (not speaking about their gravity), avoiding to mention in the referral anything specific. And, partially, it happened because the format of a video-conference, especially, in such a setup, was NOT for patients suffering from such serious and complicated problems as mine.


28 May 2020 - Thursday

An appointment with Dr. Viviott (12:00) did not bring anything positive again, because the clinic was blocking her help within the public medical system's frames.


29 May 2020, Friday

I supposed to meet one of my friends at 15.00, but our reunion was cancelled, and, still, police vehicles closely watched me this day.


31 May 2020, Sunday

I met my friend at 15.00, while being closely observed by the police.


CHAPTER 3. June-December 2020.


JUNE 2020


1 June 2020, Monday

Finally, I received a call from Dr. Sonea (10:40), dermatologist (5122 Sherbrook West, officesonea@gmail.com).


I never met such a cynical, money-hungry shark with doctor's license.


2 June 2020

At 2:45, I supposed to see Dr. Gdalewicz (Gdalevitch), but came at the wrong time (my hearing problem); they promised to call with another appointment - but never called.


5 June 2020

At 1:30, I had a first physiotherapy appointment in person, with Dr. Imar Belarbi (Verdun Hospital, 4 etage - Departement de Physiotherapie - entry from Bl. LaSalle; tel. 514-444-5963 (M-e Imar Belarbi, cell), or tél : (514) 362-1000 poste 63465, fax: 514-362-2814 (poste 63465 - add if to speak).


This was cardinally different than the phone and video-conference "appointments".


Dr. Imar Belarbi's instructions and explanations played an important role in the further healing process, in contrast to completely useless phone and video conversations.


Besides, the doctor did not care about the formal and precise indications in the referral, and offered his help not only for the hand's rehabilitation, but for the whole musculoskeletal (locomotor) system's functions restoration after multiple traumas.


He helped me a lot to restore the functionality of the right wrist, shoulder, and elbow as well, deeply damaged by the plaster.


Another thing that he did it so briefly and hectically, that most of the patients on my place would did not catch anything. Only good prepared and having the basic medical knowledge individuals could understand his strikingly short lessons.


I don't know - why it happened, but I have confident in Dr. Imar Belarbi 's good heart and responsible attitude to his work, so, I blame the System for all things that made the normal medical help available ONLY for the rich or influential, or belonging to the governing elite-related circles people.


Judging by my observations, Dr. Imar Belarbi did for me everything he could do in the present outraged situation with the health care system in Canada.


10 June 2020 - 9:15

Another doctor, who helped me a lot to recover after terrible traumas, was Dr. Schultz, who called me on June 10, 2020, and gave me on telephone very important instructions, which (with Dr. Imar Belarbi's lessons, and with my own knowledge and stoical efforts) were essential for the recovery.


If not my own efforts and knowledge, Dr. Imar Belarbi's lessons, and Dr. Schultz's instructions, my right hand would remain non-functional forever.


26 June 2020

Dr. Gdalewicz (Gdalevitch) supposed to call me at 13:30, but she did not call, sabotaging the appointment.


However, there was an anonymous telephone call more then 1,5 hours after the scheduled time of rendezvous.


If it was Dr. Gdalewicz: then she violated the norms, because a call after almost 2 hours is inacceptable, and, besides, she disconnected so quickly (too early) that I had no time to pick up the receiver (she did not wait for the answering machine, and even did not leave me time to jump to the phone). Because I don't have a mobile phone, but used an old "conventional" apparatus, I not supposed to answer instantly. By all the norms, Dr. Gdalevitch was obliged to hold on unless 7-10 seconds - before disconnecting.


29 June 2020

At 9:15, I had an appointment with Dr. Roi, the dentist.


He prepared the dentures knowing that I'll not be able to use them anyways.


To the dentist I was taken by car (my wife was driving) - 8:50 - 9:15.


At the key points we met the police car 16-01, and 3 security cars, plus 3 "Chicken" cars - 12 times!


From the dentist I came home walking - 9:30 - 9:52.


At key points and on my way - I was all the time followed by the same police car 16-01. Besides, I saw also a "munic" car PNG-3202 (?) - 6 times; 2 security cars; and "munic" red mini-track - 4 times.


29 June 2020

At 14:00, came a call from Dr. Poliquin. He arranged repeated exams, which later were also sabotaged by the hospital administration as well.


JULY 2020


11 July 2020 (Saturday)

Between 14:00 - 15:00, I was at home with the piano tuner.


13 July 2020, Monday

After my written letter to Verdun Hospital's administration, in which I explained that could not get along with Dr. Gdalevitch, and demanded another orthopedic specialist, I, finally, got an appointment (at 9:20) - with Dr. Massea - an orthopedic specialist.


Dr. Massea appeared to be a completely different person than Dr. Gdalevitch, and had a completely different, human approach to my suffering. He evaluated my injuries much more serious than Dr. Gdalevitch, and his assessment was not like Dr. Gdalevitch's not just because he displayed more compassion, but, first of all, because he stated very different conclusions (than Dr. Gdalevitch's), and because he administrated a different treatment plan.


First of all, Dr. Massea replaced Dr. Gdalevitch's physiotherapy prescription (referral) by another one (his own), which specified the whole scale of my injuries, without the mocking restriction of the physiotherapy to an exclusively small (ridiculously small) area.


Secondly, he prescribed Tylenol to reduce the pain, and - besides - the right Tylenol.


Thirdly, he approved Dr. Schultz's prescription of Celebrex as a good measure for securing the healing process, a prophylactic of the side-effects' inflammation, and other complications from the injuries, and told me that, in his opinion, without Celebrex, I would never recover.


Fourthly, he agreed that the plaster was, probably, badly applied, and recognized an obvious damage, which originated not from the initial fracture, but from the plaster.


Fifthly, he also prescribed 2 additional medications, which had to help my fingers, hand, wrist, elbow, and shoulder to recover.


In addition, he spent with me not less than 30 minutes, carefully examining my fingers, wrist, hand, elbow, and shoulder, hematomas on my back, etc., and - at the same time - doing some healing physiotherapy and instructing me how to I can do it myself.


He issued a document to my local CLCS, for a course of procedures for horrific hematomas' treatment (compresses, etc.).


Only after my meeting with Dr. Massea, and his cardinally contrast approach, I clearly realized how cruel was Dr. Gdalevitch, and what level of damage she did to me without mercy - as if I was her personal enemy or a despised criminal. However, by my analysis and according to my sad experience, she is not as bad as some of the worst sadists among the doctors, and even not as unethical as many of her colleagues-medics, but, in the same time, she crossed an imaginary invisible red line of behavior, which should be never acceptable to people who want to call themselves medical practitioners.


22 Jul 2020, Wednesday

The appointment with Dr. Roi (the dentist), scheduled at 7:30, was cancelled because the

dentures allowance was not ready yet.


27 Jul 2020

In the end of July, I urgently needed a blood-urine test, and, having 4 requisition from 4 different doctors, has chosen my family doctor's prescription, which I used for passing lab tests.


However, my access to medical lab tests was completely blocked by hospitals.


Using Covid measures and restrictions as a pretext, two hospitals motivated the refusal "by Covid" (!). Other hospitals just blocked me an access to the tests, without even caring to explain - why.


The provincial and the federal government used the Covid situation for simply further converting the medical system into a political tool to harm dissidents, representatives of so-called "social ballast" (unemployed, elderly, handicaps, etc.), low-income citizens, and some other groups.


One of the hospitals, which blocked me an access to laboratory tests, was the Verdun Hospital.


I filed a complaint about an incident at Verdun Hospital, which was never answered by its ombudsman:


"J'étais chassé de l'hôpital du Verdun. On me dit que je ne peux pas là faire l'analyse du sang selon l'ordonnance du médecin que ne travaille pas dans cet hôpital. Ma question est : si cette prétexte est légal ?"


I called to several CLSC-s: they claimed that don't do the blood test, while - in reality - it is not true.


Finally, I could pass the blood test exclusively at St.-Mary's lab.


However, 2 or 3 (as minimum) of the blood test report's pages just disappeared (were missing), and the urine test has vanished completely.


AUGUST 2020


12 August 2020

My family doctor administrated not only the lab tests, but also an MRI exam, scheduled at 12:30 at St.-Mary's Hospital, which objective was to check the gravity of the uterus' calcification.


This exam required the blood test of the strum creatinine.


20 Aug. 2020

My chronicle can make an impression that in the 2-nd half of 2019 and in 2020 I had too many medical appointments, which, allegedly, contradict the claims about the degradation of medical help in Canada and the sadistic tendency in health care. However, maybe even 1 third of all appointment were cancelled completely, or rescheduled for another day.


Here I indicated not all cancelled appointments, but just - selectively - some of them.


And the appointment with Dr. Roi, the dentist (13.10), was first cancelled by me as well - because I was suddenly given an appointment with Dr. Lesk at the same time.


Only when I called around 11 a.m. 19 Aug. 2020, it was changed to 20:30, the same day (20 Aug. 2020).


At 13:00 I had to appear in Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital, to see Dr. Lesk.


(More details are given in the part "Who Destroyed my Vision and Hearing".)


Considering the need of so many medical appointment, it is the Medical System itself (so-called "health care"), which provoked the overwhelming majority of them.


Taking, for example, into consideration the recurrent (in spite of 2 surgeries) urological problems and recurrent UT infections; new arthritis attacks; cardiovascular problems; and some other health problems, I came to a conclusion that they all are partially or completely related to untreated dental cavities and other dental problems. Government's refusal to cover dental care for low-income individuals and families (who cannot afford dental services) is emptying the moneybox resources of public health care faster than a fully covered public dental plan. Hundreds of urgently needed surgeries are delayed because of the untreated dental problems in patients, whose impossibility to use dental care is threatening by severe complications or death in case of transplantation surgeries, or a number of other surgical operations. Untreated dental problems are posing a risk to life of patients on chemotherapy, and some other categories of patients.


From my conversations with people, from my personal experience, and from the study of information available in newspapers, TV and radio channels, I came to a conclusion that the access to dental care is cut off from 60-70 percent of Quebec population. This vicious inhuman policy doesn't reflect an austerity (of the state resources), doesn't serves national interests: it serves only a very small clique of medical gangsters, who's profiting from the national tragedy.


The government policy, which reflects such savage aggressive profit-making on top of mass atrocities of the vulnerable population, is antinational, and matches a hidden motto of modern sinister repressive class: "not to heal, but to kill".


Inhuman advocates of this savage domination of the moral freaks will say that, at least, the teeth removal is available in most of the cases, and for almost all citizens, even if low-income patients are forced to extract semi-healthy and healthy teeth, but my case refutes such an allegation. Indeed, trying to get rid of the additional sources of infection, I resorted to an utmost step: to remove all teeth, together with the healthy teeth, and to have dental prostheses. However, the discrimination of unprivileged patients, and some other inequality factors instigated an even bigger problem: my jaw was damaged, the alveolar bones - broken, cosmetic defect provoked, my diction and even hearing affected, and no dentures will fit into my mouth in case if I lose the rest of my teeth.


It must be also taken into consideration that the dental surgeries "for beggars" have subjected me to such level of tortures (because of the damage to jaw and small bones, infections, and other severe complications, and - then - because of dentists' refusal to render further help connected to these complications) - that now I try to avoid any new teeth removal for any cost.


Now I am forced to delay teeth extraction as long as possible, regardless of the cumulative effect to body's inflammation processes, triggering UTI's, arthritis, cardiovascular problems, and so on.


26 Aug. 2020

Meanwhile, I was receiving the physiotherapy at Verdun Hospital, but now - more and more often - the appointments were canceled, and the dates were changed to later dates.


The same happened with the appointment at 8.00, which was changed to 1 Sept. 2020 - 8.00.


SEPTEMBER, 2020


1 Sept. 2020

The physiotherapy appointment at Verdun Hospital (8.00) this time took place as scheduled.


15 Sept. 2020

The physiotherapy appointment at Verdun Hospital (8.15) this time also took place as scheduled.


21 Sept. 2020, Monday

Today, I came at 15:00 to SOS Sourire dental clinic for checking the prostheses.


I am not sure that it was Dr. Roi (because of the mask and antiviral plastic protection), but, I think, it was him.


He told me not to press to the dentures hard, because this is just a model, and it is fragile. I asked how can I know then if the dentures are fitting?


He gave no respond.


I also told him that the dentures did not allow me to speak, but he assured me that this is because they are just a model, and when I"ll put the real dentures, it will be different.


He gave me a mirror, and asked if I am satisfied and if the color is similar to my own teeth.


I responded that my eyes were injured, and at the present moment I am not able to distinguish properly between the colors, and that this mirror is not corresponding to my vision.


I also noticed that only another person (my wife or daughters) could see all the details.


I saw that the lower dentures seemed to be more less OK, but the upper dentures have a curved ark, with 2 artificial teeth on the right are sticking out. However, I said nothing to Dr. Roi, because all my previous concerns were just bounced out by him.


When I was ready to leave, he suddenly said that I MUST sign a document, which was presented in such a way as if signing this document was conditional for getting the dentures - when they are complete.


In other words, it was staged so that aimed to bring to my knowledge that without signing this paper I will not get the dentures.


When he gave me this paper to sign, he did not read it to me, but only said that it is a consent for having the dentures done, and, when I did an attempt to read it myself carefully, he has started to speak and assure that this is "of no importance", and "just a formality", disturbing my concentration, and also began to move the paper, so, that I was not able to finish reading, especially having difficulty with my vision as well and having no glasses. Because I am an aged person, who survived a number of accidents, injuries, surgeries, and health issues, I am vulnerable to the pressure, and I signed this paper, without having sustained the pressure put upon me.


Here (below) is the test of this document:


"SOS Sourire Verdun

4941 Wellington Street

Verdun

H4G 1X8

Phone: 514-544-4441

verdun@sossourire.com


Date: 21-09-2020


Acceptation de l'esthétique prothétigue

Moi, Lev Gunin J_, se déctare satisfait(e) de

la couteur des dents, de ta forme des dents et de i'alignement

des dents de ta prothèse : P_

que Dr (e) : Roi

va mettre en bouche te : 21-09-2020


Dans t'éventuatité où i) y a un probtème esthétique, je m'engage à avertir mon dentiste traitant à i'essayage, avant que ta prothèse soit fixée ou cottée. Si après )a mise en bouche, i! devait y avoir des modifications esthétiques, ceux-ci seront effectués à mes frais.


Signature patient(e)


Acceptance of prosthetic aesthetics


I, the undersigned, _ hereby declare myseif satisfied with

the color, shape and alignment of the prosthetic

teeth that Dr. will install on:


In the event of any dissatisfaction regarding the aesthetics of my prosthetics, I hereby accept that it is my responsibility to inform the treating dentist at the time of fitting, before the prosthetics are fixed or bonded. Furthermore, I understand that any aesthetic changes required after the installation of the prosthetics are at my own expense.


Signature of patient

Signature of dentist"


This event revealed one of the most sinister (or even horrific) secrets of the Canadian health-care system.


I am sure that Dr. Roi is a compassionate person, and a good doctor and man.


And if SUCH a man commits such an obviously unethical act: there is something really appalling behind it.


From this phenomenon - to an obligation to kill a patient if the government will need it: is only one small step.


When good people are somehow forced to commit unethical acts, it sends a very dreadful feeling that we live in some wild medieval epoch of bloody tortures and massive slain of people without any moral consideration. Only during the most loathsome dark eras good people were left no chances but to comply with monsters' orders.


When - once - Dr. Roi asked me if I had a surgery on the right side, including the surgery on the gum, I told that I don't remember, because did not understand right away about what area he is talking. Then he said that it, certainly, was an optical flare in the computer.


If he did not care about the collective cover-up and mutual protection of the dentists' order, he had a duty to tell me about the damage, which did to my dental apparatus other dentists before him. But, if I did not explain anything myself, he preferred to call it "an optical flare in the computer".


When - later- I told him that the alveolar bones and the jaw were damaged during the teeth removal, combined - in the case of the upper jaw - with a surgery on the gum: he started underplaying the damage, saying that the jaw abnormal position of the right side can be partially compensated by special exercises, without making any comments about the damage itself.


Dr. Roi was perfectly realizing that no dentures could fit and be useful for me because of the damage to the jaw and to the alveolar bones, and he knew in advance that I'll not be able to weary the dentures. Only some special dental prostheses - MAY BE - could resolve this problem, but such prostheses can cost up to 10 thousand dollars, and, still, there are no warranty that they will fit considering all the defects, inflicted by the dentists in the past. Of course, I don't have not just 10 thousand CD, but even 200-400 dollars, and the government would never authorize for me dentures more expensive than the cheapest and the most primitive ones.


Why - then - I started this procedure, in the first place? Why I had to waste the public money, if I doubted that ANY dentures could fit me with the jaw and alveolar bones' defects?


Simply because Dr. Roi has managed to convince me somehow that it is possible to manufacture dental prostheses taking into consideration all the measurements and my individual features, and I started to believe in his lie.


However, 8 or 11 months later I came into conclusion that Dr. Roi was just lying to himself and was lying to me that the most primitive and standard dentures would be wearable in my mouth.


30 Sept. 2020, Monday

Dr. Roi at SOS Sourire (15:50) was again checking the prostheses.


[See also the detailed report in "The Dental Drama" (how Dr. Roi has ignored my direct report on neoplasm, pretending that he interpreted my words about "bumpy palate" as a pretext to reject the dentures).]


OCTOBER, 2020


5 Oct. 2020

I supposed to have another course of the physiotherapy at 8:00, but forgot and did not come in time, and then it was too late.


It is nothing surprising, because under the number of stressful situations (taking just the dental saga is enough!) it can happen with everyone.


25 or 26 of Oct. 2020

A piece of a metal was in one of the prunes in the sack of Kirkland Sunsweet pack.


It was as big as almost a flash memory stick, and sharp as knife...


Miraculously, I did not swallow it and did not cut my tongue, or gums, or cheeks. If I swallowed it - I would die, and if I would cut something inside my mouth, I could die from the blood loss.


This packet of prunes we bought at Costco.


NOVEMBER, 2020


3 Nov. 2020

I've experienced another stomach - low-intestines attack after eating kenua +.


After this, I stopped eating kenua.


5-6 Nov. 2020

Another glaucoma attack has shown all the vulnerability of my situation again.


Besides the objective factors (the System's abusive unwillingness to save my vision), Azagra changed its color + Artificial Tears out of date.


I have no explanation, why Azarga should become bad, but, theoretically, it is possible if I was given not a fresh bottle in the pharmacy. Otherwise it is hard to suggest anything else, because it is normally +19C in our apartment, and the bottle with the eye drops is kept in a dark place.


11 Nov. 2020

I visited an optometrist (the appointment - 11:15) at the corner Atwater - Notre-Dame.


(See the details in "Who Destroyed my Vision and Hearing".)


CHAPTER 4. March-December 2021.


2021


MARCH 2021


1 March 2021

Something has pricked me in the scapula, when I was by my older daughter. Now, there is a tiny oval trace (very painful).


9 March 2021

At 8:45 - I received a phone call from Dr. Rohan.


15 March 2021

Since March, 15, 2021: very severe constipations again.


APRIL 2021


12 Apr. 2021

An email from one of my readers contained a wish of the sender to meet me personally, for telling me something "extremely important".


Same day, I met her at Lionel-Groux metro station, and then went with her (crossing the canal over the pedestrian bridge) to Charlevoix metro station.


I did not remember her, but she claimed that in 2000 (or 2001), I, allegedly, asked her and her husband to take me (by their car) to several churches, for asking for an asylum in case of a deportation order. She said that they did not arrive by then to pick me up because someone has vandalized and destroyed their car just hours before our meeting.


Her husband did not advise her to contact me after this incident, and they have cut all contacts with me.


All these years it was disturbing her conscience, that's why she wanted to meet me and to tell me this (not on the phone).


She also described me a horrible story about her 4-months-old grandchild, who was mistreated in the hospital, and whose life is in danger. (The connection between her desire to see me, and her grandson's salvation was clear: she wanted to clean her conscience, which, in her opinion, could open a way for the help of the celestial forces).


When I left to meet her, I attached some objects to the front door, and, when I came back, they were on the floor (I know how to open the door without provoking a fall of these things). It means that someone was in my apartment in my absence.


When I was speaking to N., we were under unprecedented (considering last months) police-security surveillance.


She has manifested a striking knowledge about me - and my family members. For example, after 20 years, she remembered the names of my mother, wife, and children, and knew, who, between my two daughters, is a psychologist.


14 Apr 2021

I called Yu. [who claimed (during last 5 months) that he had a micro-stroke and scaring health declining conditions (including a terrible and super-fast advancing cataract, etc.) not on natural cause, but was a victim of a maleficent sorcery's damage]. We spoke on the phone around 40 minutes, and then he started to say goodbye, while my old phone's receiver started to produce peep sounds, as if it was close to a complete discharge. As I did not speak on the phone since yesterday, it not supposed to happen. So, I was about to disconnect, and said goodbye, too. However, Yu. suddenly and strangely restarted the conversation, and kept me on the line. To save the battery, I had to switch from the speakerphone mode to the ear-dynamic mode, and - in this very second (when I pressed the receiver stronger to the ear) I felt like a short blow to my ear and a shake (and momentary dizziness) in my head, and a high-pitch hiss has appeared in my ears.

Before 14 Apr. 2021, I had no noise, hiss, or ringing in my ears for around 3 weeks. Such a violent, sudden, and inexplicable return of the noise in my ears happened already 3 or 4 times during my phone conversations with Yu., so, it could not be an occasion. And, because I don't believe in all this supernatural superstitions, I suspect a peace of technology behind everything that happened to me during my communications with Yu.


Probably, the best solution is to stop any contacts with him.


26 April 2021

I sent a demand to Maisonneuve-Rosemont hospital to access my dosier ophthalmologique. They responded quickly, but the procedure is blocked by a payment protocol.


MAY, 2021


10 May 2021

The last fortress of privacy, confidentiality, and personal security was represented by a possibility to do some medical tests without an appointment, when a patient just shows up at a lab, or in a medical imaging clinic.


However, the governments, using "Covid" as a pretext, have crashed this last refuge of freedom and human rights. They made an opportunity to show up in a medical institution without an appointment - illegal and impossible.


They, in general, used Covid for an opportunity to boost even more the level of spying on citizens, and to oppress the overwhelming majority of people for the benefits of few.


The police state (and its repressions machine) has extended its bloody hands to the medical domain completely and firmly. The most obsessive desire of any tyranny is to put every smallest thing under a strict authoritarian control.


Now I heard some rumors and repercussion from the provincial governmental circles that the reactionaries have a plan to make an appearance even in an Emergency Room impossible without an inscription online. If they will go ahead, it will mean that the tyrannical government wants to criminalize people without mobile phones, in parallel of Orwell's "1984". The "Older Brother" must watch you every moment, 24 x 7. And, if these monsters will make peoples' present in the streets illegal without the cellular phones, then, from here is only one step to criminalize disconnection the cellphones even at home. Your phone will be always on and connected to Internet, and a disconnection will bring fines, and - later - an imprisonment.


The knowledge about the precise day and time of someone's from the black list "residents" arrival to lab tests opens a new venue of the terror tools, from blocking an access to such basic tests as a blood test, to the most sinister medical crimes.


My experience illustrates that obviously and clearly.


In April, I received an appointment for the blood test for 10 May 2021 (at 10.00, at CLSC, rue Centre (Tel. (514) 937-9251).


When I called the CLSC on 2 April 2021, I was told that my appointment is on May 1, 2021, at 18:00.


Having suspicions about the date and (especially) time, I contacted CLSC again on 15 Apr. 2021, and was told that no appointment was registered under my name, and that I have to book another appointment. The date "1 May" has already contained a hint to a mockery - judging by my former experience.


My protests were not taken into consideration, and I received another date, 10 May 2021, at 10:00.


People - whom I know - told me that they never (during the pandemic, because - till spring 2019 - an appointment was booked 1-2 days in advance in CLSC, and, concerning hospitals, you could just walk in) waited for a laboratory test as long as a month. Everyone was given an appointment within a week or two maximal.


So, on 10 May 2021, I had an appointment for the blood-urine test at Pointe St.-Charles CLSC at rue Centre.


Wearing a blue approved "anti-Covid" mask, I came punctually at 9:55, as was told on the phone (5 minutes in advance), and disinfected my hands near the entrance.


However, seeing that I already did it, the nurse still demanded the hands cleaning ritual, which was already an insult. I did not argue, just complied.


She ordered me to sit down on a designated chair, and brought another (same as mine) mask, ordering me to replace my mask by that one. Her mask was not in a box, not even in a plastic cover. She was holding a jammed mask without any cover; obviously - not sterile. I replied that I have no confidence in her mask - and do not want to be infected by it. But she insisted, threatening to block me from entering the blood test room.


I responded that, if so, I am leaving, and demanded my requisition back. The woman was about to change her mind, but consulted her chef, a low white not fat person, who limped a little. I immediately recognized him. Several years ago, once he already manifested an inhuman approach.


He was insisting that I absolutely must change the mask, and even raised his voice, speaking with me in such a bureaucratic style as if I was not a human being.


I told that, after putting the mask on, I came directly from home, from door to door, without any contacts at home or in the street, and, thus, the mask, which I am wearing, cannot be contaminated: no way.


However, he was unshakable.


I said that I am leaving, and demanded the requisition back.


He did not return the paper, but disappeared in a door near the entrance.


The nurse did not allow me to continue sitting, and expelled me to the space near the entrance, and that looked like a punishment.


I have no idea how long I waited, but, obviously, more than 5 or 10 minutes.


Then the man has appeared again from the back door, returning the paper and sending me away.


Thus, I was denied a test, which absence (regarding my health issues) can lead to any unpredictable consequences.


I must stress that they did not demand to change the mask from the person, who came after me; at least, not in my presence. When my wife has passed a blood test in the same CLSC, she also entered in her own mask to the procedure.


I believe that it could be an act of a pre-planned sabotage, or an act of racism.


On my way home, I had tachycardia and heart pain, and could experience a heart attack or a stroke because of the humiliation of 3 bureaucrats and formalists, and would like to know, whom the man from the CLSC contacted asking what to do with me (when he disappeared in the back door with his mobile phone and readiness to call someone).


I do not believe in any scientific base for the policy to change the masks when entering a medical institution. On the contrary, I believe that this policy is helping the virus to spread. At the different stages of the pandemic, the medical institutions were becoming the major spots of the covid bubble, and the policy of wearing a hospital-provided mask could contribute to the pandemic. It is very possibly that not the sanitary considerations, but a desire to expose people to the surveillance cameras is behind this policy, and the paranoiac obsession of surveillance is putting people at risk.


12 May 2021

I visited (again) the same optometrist (14:45) - at the corner of Notre-Dame and Atwater.


She gave me a referral to Dr. Nguen - an ophthalmologist.


Having an appointment with Dr. Lesk cancelled by the Maisonneuve-Rosemont Eye Clinic, and no new appointment available for me instead, I was left in an alarming situation of the frequent glaucoma attacks and instable IOP without an ophthalmological care, and was forced to look for another doctor.


Presently feeling pressure inside both eyes, pain, and suspecting an abnormally high IOP, I looked forward to see Dr. Nguen. Here is a new saga begins.


1) I called Dr. Nguen (ophthalmologist) - 514-769-3399. No response, I left a

message.


2) 26 April 2021 - sent a demand to Maisonneuve-Rosemont hospital to access my dosier ophthalmologique. The responded quickly, but the procedure was blocked by a payment

protocol. On 13 May 2021, I called the archive (telephone: (514) 252-3549; Fax: (514) 252-3502) - and left a message.


31 May 2021

I supposed to see Dr. Nguen (an ophthalmologist), at 9:30 (rue Allard), but, instead, I was just examined by a nurse or a junior assistant for IOP, and then was demanded money for the most important tests.


I understood this attempt of money extortion for procedures, which must be free in case of medical necessity in both private and public clinics, as a pre-condition of seeing Dr. Nguen.


(See the details in "Who Destroyed my Vision and Hearing").


JUNE, 2021


9 June 2021, Wednesday

Since February 2021, I was looking for a lawyer for bringing up the police intimidation: innumerous escorts, demonstrative interceptions and surveillance, stoppings by police, etc. Simultaneously, I decided to fight legally bizarre events in the medical institutions (first, connected to Ministry of Immigration's repressions (1994-2001), and then - since Harper-Trudeau regime came to power).


All these years, I considered a lawsuit an unworthy and even shameful matter, not much better than a role of an informer (a mole). The additional moral obstacles for me are - my respect to police, which defends us from the criminal mayhem; and my adoration of the health professionals, who - in the most cases - regard their profession as a humanitarian mission, and among them I met a lot of really nice, noble people. However, towards me, the System crossed all the red lines, and I decided: enough is enough. The injustice and the threat to my life made me less reluctant to self-defense, which is my primary right.


But my efforts to find justice failed in the society, which (since Harper era) made justice illegal, and legalized injustice as the basic law.


I called 24 private lawyers' offices, and none of them expressed a will to take my case: nor the "police" case, either the "medical" case. One of the lawyers even told me cynically that I'll not find a lawyer in Canada for "SUCH a case".


Then (since March 2021) I contacted 4 Legal Aid bureaus, but each of them was sending me to another Legal Aid office, and some of their lawyers have told me in advance that no one will take a case against the police.


The same happened with a medical Legal Aid lawyer: I was denied a legal aid even more cynically, because the cases against the police (for not charged individuals) were in general suspended by the government, while the medical Legal Aid lawyers still were paid in 2021.


On 9 June 2021, I had my first appointment at Aide-Juridique (14:30) [800, boul. de Maisonneuve Est Bureau 900, Montréal, Téléphone 514 842-2233, Télécopieur 514 842-1970, Courriel baj.criminalistes@ccjm.qc.ca].


More details are given in my wide report on police intimidation, available on Internet.


17 June 2021

At, 10:20, I reveived a call from CLSC Pointe St.-Charles about the blood test that was refused on 10 May 2021.


The caller insisted that the policy of changing the mask in the medical institutions and accepting the masks provided by them is scientifically-based and necessary, but he could not prove it.


When he said that, allegedly, this is needed because patients can wear reutilized masks, I argued that nobody cancelled the presumption of innocence, and that the medics can just ask patients about it.


I said that, in my opinion, there is no scientific basis under this policy, which, on the opposite, contributed to the spread of the virus.


There are no more contagious (contaminated) sites during an epidemic or pandemic than the hospitals, and the risks to be infected through hospital-provided masks are much higher than other possibilities. The main (hidden) reason of the mask changing policy, I added, is to flash patients faces for surveillance cameras.


I also said that the mask, provided to me by the nurse on 10 May 2021, was not in a box, not in a plastic cover, but without anything, and looked not new and not "propre".


However, in response, the caller has twisted my words, claiming that "this is not true, we never provide dirty masks", while I did not pronounce the word "dirty" (sale). Such illegal, deceptive methods indicate the degree of his unethical ideology.


I emphasized that - on the 10-th of May - I was wearing exactly the same type of mask as the one that was offered to me at CLSC at rue Centre, and said to the nurse (and her chef) that (after sterilizing my hands) I put on a brand new mask at home, and came straight here, from door to door, meeting no one on my way and not touching the mask.


He stressed then that - if I would go to a hospital - I would be forced to change the mask: the same as in CLSC.


In response, I said that I visited hospitals 3 or 4 times (in reality: dozens of times) during the worse periods of the pandemics, and was never forced to change the mask (which indicates that many compassionate, empathically relevant people still work in the medical system).


Whatever the regulations are - I stressed - you must remain human and lucid. Even the CLSC nurse, who wanted to give me the mask, which was not in its original cover (and, therefore, not sterile) and looked crumpled, was ready to change her mind, but her chef has intervened - and blocked my way.


I stated that the refusal of the blood test - maybe - already caused a significant damage to my health, and now (almost a month and a half since the incident) it became an urgency. I said, OK, if I'll agree to change the mask, but only for my own one from the original untouched box and in its original plastic cover, and would change it before your eyes, will you give me the appointment?


He said "no" with a palpable anger, - and disconnected.


28 June 2021, Monday

In other parts of this work, I described the ordeal with the cyst of an old scare on my back, which was disturbing me since 2013, and required 2 surgical interventions, one of which was devastating and dramatic, and, besides, a major infection of this cyst has by then caused a lot of damage and risk to my life.


All multiple infections of the cyst happened because of the denial to remove the cyst by doctors, in spite of all medical indications.


(See the details in "The Mistreatment of my Injuries").


In June 2021, the cyst was inflamed and infected again, and, again, I met a slow reaction of the doctors, who did not want to treat it with antibiotics, causing more danger and prolonging the suffering.


Because I did not find help from other doctors, I turned to my local CLSC, were very good people worked.


I had an appointment in CLSC - Pointe-St.-Charles Dr. Mongeau-Petipas, Rosalie, at 11:30. She prescribed an antibiotic cream Taro-Mupirocin, and issued a requisition for Ultrasound (Masse 1,5 cm a/n bas rachis dorsal r/o kyste vs baces). However, I did not find (in her prescription) the order for oral antibiotics, which I (mainly) demanded.


29 June 2021, Tuesday

Cyst's Ultrasound - 11:30, at a very distant clinic in Nord-East Montreal.


30 June 2021

I had a telephone conversation with Dr. McNicolle from CLSC PSC. She prescribed oral antibiotics (in connection to the infected cyst on my back).


JULY 2021


6 July, 2021, Tuesday

Meanwhile, the Blood Test ordeal has continued (since April 2021).


As I described above, the lab tests were blocked for me at one of the CLSC's PSC section at rue Centre. Then I called 6 other medical institutions, including 3 hospitals, and was just mocked by them, because I was given an appointment for lab tests for December 2021 or January 2022.


Finally, I could get an appointment in one of the CLSCs, and passed it at 9:50, arriving there by Metro.


7 Jul. 2021, Wednesday

Trying to find a permanent solution to the cyst's threat, and for other unsolved issues, at 9:00 I visited Dr. Rohan, my family doctor.


12 Jul. 2021

Terrible constipation, with the internal injures consequences.


20 Jul. 2021, Tuesday

The incident on July 12, 2021, is shading more light on government's, secret services', and secret societies' cover operations inside medical institutions.


I already described - how, booking an appointment in advance (for 10 April 2020 (Friday), I came with an X-Ray requisition from my family doctor to Cote des Neiges Radiological Center, and one of the secretaries told me that she cannot find my name anywhere, and, thus - I must go home: because, allegedly, I have no appointment, and, so, will not be allowed to do the X-Ray.


She just refused to listen my statement that I BOOKED an appointment, and that, besides, an X-Ray is not an ultrasound, and must be done even without an appointment, according to the law.


Then another secretary came in, and, hearing the end of the dispute, quickly found my name and the inscription of my appointment.


[Running forward: the same "1-st" secretary (nearly low white woman - possibly, a Quebecer - normal body shape, in her late 40-s or mid 50-s) did the same trick 3 more times during next 2 years, and, eventually, works as an informer and provocateur for some governmental circles.]


On July 20, 2021, when I came at 10:15 to 53000 Cote des Neiges (Bureau 600) for another cyst's ultrasound (the situation demanded to repeated it), my appointment for an ultrasound was again almost sabotaged by the same lady.


I was told on the phone that my appointment is on 20 Jul. 2021, at 10:15.


My wife listened to the recording, and also heard: 10:15.


However, when I came and showed my RAMQ card, 2 female secretaries said that there is no any appointment for me on 20 July 2021.


I started to argue with them, insisting that I HAVE an appointment, that I recorded the conversation with the secretary, and that it was told clearly: 20 July 2021, at 10:15.


They replied that, probably, I made an appointment not to their bureau, but at "another place". I challenged it, insisting that I am sure that I have an appointment at this particular location.


They said that it cannot be so, and advised me to go home.


But I still insisted on my today"s appointment, saying that I called one of 2 phone numbers indicated on the requisition paper, and received the appointment date and time while speaking with this telephone number.


The second secretary, who was sitting (another one was standing), has started to call somewhere, to verify if my appointment was booked with "them". At this moment, I turned away, approaching the elevators to leave the radiology, but the secretaries called me, and I went back to the desk. The one that was standing, was pointed to her colleague and to the journal with her finger, saying that my appointment was there indeed, but was registered in a weird way.


However, they said that my appointment is not at 10 a.m., but at 5:00 (17:00) p.m.


Now, no argument that: 1) it was not mine, but their error; 2) I already spent money to come there; 3) for a fasting patient, an appointment time is supposed to be in the morning; 4) I am already fasting since yesterday, and they have no rights to extend it for another day, while it is contraindicated due to my health issues; and 5) if even it would be my mistake, they had to find me a niche in the morning due to their moral, humanitarian, ethical, and situational obligations - helped: I was sent home without an ultrasound.


When I came back at 17:00, I waited 1 hour and 20 minutes, in spite of my demand to accelerate my ultrasound test, because I already came in the morning, and I am fasting 2 days.


Coming home, I listened to the recording again, and discovered that the secretary announced 2 contradictive appointment times: ones she said that the appointment is at 10, then that the appointment is at 17:00.


My wife also heard the recording, and confirmed that the secretary just made a mistake. It was the same nearly low white secretary, who's trying to sabotage my appointment again.


When I obtained the ultrasound report, it was indicated that I passed the test at 17:15; but it was not true, because I came at 17:00, and was called for the test around 18:25.


This represented just another sample of medical institutions' arbitrariness: they do what they want, they randomly change the date, the time, the data, and there is no supervision and no mechanisms to protect patients" rights.


AUGUST 2021


6 Aug. 2021

At 17:00, I supposed to see Dr. Diserpola, the ophthalmologist (tel. (514) 385-05-30, 1240, av Beaumont, Suite 110, Ville Mont-Royal, QC, H3P 3E5 Phone: 514-385-0530 Fax: 514-385-3039), to whom I was referred by my family doctor.


However, when I came at the designated time, the office was closed, and nobody was there.


Since May 2021, this was the 3-rd incident - when I was told a wrong time, or my appointment was registered wrongly.


This can not be an accident, so, consequently, I am not tempted to accuse anyone at Dr. Diserpola's office, including his secretary, for such a mistake, because something really weird is going on, which is beyond our comprehension on the ontological level.


When I contacted Dr. Diserpola"s office on 12 July 2021, I was told by a young female secretary that I can have an appointment on August 6, at 5 p.m. (17:00).


I registered this conversation, which was later listened by my wife and my younger daughter. They both heard the same time: 17:00.


Being not sure that I have the right address, I contacted Doctor"s bureau 2 times, left a message, but was never called back. By then, my daughter expressed her concerns about the time of the appointment, as the office works till 16:00.


On 5 August 2021 (14:36), I received another call from Dr. Diserpola"s office.


This time, an older secretary spoke to me, to remind me that I have an appointment on 6 Aug. 2021, but she did not mention the time, or pronounced it so quickly that I was not able to catch it. She spoke with an irritation (maybe, she was in a rush), but I tried to speak to her as polite as I could, and said that I need to verify the address and the time of the appointment. She calmed down and patiently dictated the address to me, but disconnected without confirming the time of the appointment. Having still no confirmation of the appointment"s time, I called back, but there was no response.


Next day, my wife called the phone 514-385-05-30 innumerous times, and left a message (that she needs today's appointment's time confirmation) twice, but nobody called back.


When we came by Metro around 16:00, the office was already closed.


We waited another 40 minutes, but no one came in.


The outside temperature was 30 degrees Celsius, and such a long voyage at such a hot day was a threat to my eyes and contraindicated for other health issues, and, still, I (with my wife, who accompanied me) - we were just wasting our time and spending money for transportation in vain.


Meanwhile, the time is running out, because I am not only abandoned by the current ophthalmologist, but he also stubbornly refusing to renew 2 IOP-controlling eye-drops prescription, and - without the eye-drops - I may become blind.


Eventually, since 2017-s iridothomy (which provoked cataract), I need 2 eye-surgeries to restore the drainage system and lower the IOP, because - even with the eye-drops - the pressure jumps sometimes to 24 and 29. The prescription is expired, and - on 6 Aug. 2021 - it was the deadline to re-prescribe the eye-drops.


7 Aug. 2021


At night, from August 7 to August 8, 2021, I got traumas again, and it could be another set up again, apparently.


When it remained half-a-block to my home (it is important!), an unexpected loud roar - directly over my ear - frightened me; I impulsively turned to the back - and fell down.


The sound was coming from behind the wired fencing, which surrounds the municipal machinery parking yard between two streets, and coincided with another sound, where a group of 4 young maidens put rented bicycles in their holders-cells.


In that case, it could be like someone coordinated this noisy bang with the bicycles' clacking noises.


Having sharply turned to the back, I lost the balance - and fell: at first on the wire fencing, then on the concrete sidewalk.


Having stumbled, I would not fell if there was no something under my feet about what I was hooked, but there was no time for an inspection of the falling site, as it was necessary to get home quicker: I was not sure yet that there are no fractures and other serious damages.


It happened somewhere about midnight or a bit later.


Those that thoroughly studied my responses and reactions, could set up a trap easily.


I hit my hip, and my right hand, and injured my back, having deep cuts from the wires.


10 Aug. 2021

At 9:45, I had an appointment with Dr. Rohan.


At 12:15, came to Dr. Diserpola, the ophthalmologist (see above).


Doctor Discerpola did not answer even a single of my questions, only said that the IOP was 18 and 18 (I doubt it), and that the cataract is VERY mild.


There is a detailed description of this visit at "Who Destroyed my Vision and Heating" (see in this work).


I could not become a patient of Dr. Discerpola, because all services by him are payable, and because of few other reasons. Practically, it is not possible for him to act differently (regarding his ignoring of patient's questions), because he has a flooding of patients, a real disaster. Maybe, this is not Dr. Discerpola"s fault, or, the opposite: a sign of his altruism and compassion (a sign that he is trying to help so many patients in such a desperate situation of Quebec"s health crises that it affects his practical operations), but it does not work for me in my personal situation.


Finding out that I can not pay for other medical procedures, Dr. Discerpola have referred me to Dr. F. Zaguia, and sent fax to her, which characterize him very positively.


Running forward: Dr. Zaguia has refused to accept me as her patient, without giving a clear explanation.


I also called the office of Dr. Conrad Kavalec (Clinique des yeux, Pavillon Hayes, 3e étage Numéro de téléphone principal: 514-345-3511, poste 3644, Fax: 514-734-2711), but was not allowed to have an appointment.


Two other ophthalmologists also kicked me out, and, thus, I was left with only one option: to do everything for obtaining an appointment with Dr. Lesk again.


19 Aug. 2021

At 10 a.m. I had an appointment with Dr. Viviott (NDG Clinic - 514-228-8889 fax: 514-908-2021, 5100 Maisonneuve W., office 605, derma5100@cmbmed.com).

I don't remember, when Dr. Viviott removed the problematic tag. I think, it was during the previous appointment, at Point-Claire. Some of my notes have been lost, and that's why the gap in my memory appeared: because I had a confidence in my records.


25 Aug. 2021

At 9:25 a.m. - Dr. Rohan was on the phone.


I made several requests, as followed:


1. Repeat urine test: the last test was when I took antibiotics; besides, I have pain and other symptoms.

2. Access to my tests: it looks like the government blocked me an access to my tests, so, my last hope that you can help, Dr. Rohan. I am planning to file a complaint, but they can ask, why you do not ask your family doctor.

3. What is the name of the surgeon you referred me to on Aug. 10? I received an appointment date, but misheard his name.

4. Dr. Discerpola cannot have me as his patient, because by him most important exams are payable. He referred me to Dr. Zaguia, and sent the referral by fax. Since then, no news from Dr. Zaguia; I called myself, left messages, but there is no response.

5. I need a referral to Dr. Poliquen, because he don't work at the Medical Center in Lassal any more.


SEPTEMBER 2021


When, on 10 of September, 2021, I took new blood pressure controlling pills in the pharmacy, I noticed that the very bitter taste not present any more.


In August, I thought that it was my subjective impression, or that this taste was just a result of some gastro problems. However, as soon as I took a new bottle, it changed completely the taste.


20 Sep. 2021

I visited Maitre Legault (legal aid).


The future events have shown that it was just waste of time.


OCTOBER 2021


4 Oct. 2021, Monday

Dr. F. Zaguia (the appointment was scheduled at 8:45 a.m.), St.-Mary's Hospital Eye Clinic's ophthalmologist, denied any follow ups, and did not really assessed my eyes' problems (just measured only the IOP). She refused to include me in the number of her patients, exactly as other St.-Mary's ophthalmologists.


I have to remind that - in 2013-2014 - St.-Mary's Eyes' Clinic refused to assess and to treat my very serious ophthalmological problems, and, actually, provoked the close-angles' syndrome, which, in turn, provoked glaucoma. Then, in 2017, another St.-Mary's ophthalmologist, Dr. Gans, hectically, in an unethical rash, has performed a laser iridothomy (instead of, at first, managing the dangerous IOP by eye-drops and oral medications), and provoked a very severe disphotopsia and cataract. It is not excluded that the optical nerve also was not damaged or was not so badly damaged before the iridothomy, and that Dr. Gans not only provoked the cataract and severe disphotopsia, but damaged the optical nerve as well.


Totally, in August-September, 2021, I turned to 5 St.-Mary's ophthalmologists, including Dr. Kawalec, Dr. Zaguia, and Dr. Dicerpola, and all 3 of them refused to have me as a patient on the permanent base. This hints that on St.-Mary's Eye Clinic I am a persona non grata. Two other St.-Mary's ophthalmologists, and also Dr. Nguen also kicked me out, and, thus, I was left with only one option: to stay with Dr. Lesk, and to do everything for obtaining an appointment with Dr. Lesk again.


6 Oct. 2021, Wednesday

Around 10:45 I was seen by the surgeon Dr. Sebastian Demitteneran (or Sebastian V. Demyttenaere) [St.-Mary's Out Patients Clinic; 3777 Jean-Brilliant, room 14], to whom I was referred by Dr. Rohan.


Dr. Demyttenaere appeared to be a nice young man, very polite and sympathetic, and, it looked like there was a mutual sympathy between us.


Dr. Demyttenaere was willingly ready to remove the cyst (on the old scar) from my back, which caused so many problems for last 10 years, but I complained about another cyst (or a tumor), on my right lower neck - high shoulder, which I considered now more menacing.


He administrated an ultrasound, and told me to book an appointment as soon as the ultrasound report is ready.


NOVEMBER 2021


4 Nov. 2021

As always, with an appointment at 9:20, I had to spend the whole day in the Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital's Eye Clinic to see Dr. Lesk.


When I was passing the eyes' imaging procedure, the seat jump down (the mechanism failure), but the female (white, 30+) technician, knowing that it is not my fault, started to shout at me, accusing me of not "sitting still" during the test; Dr. Lesk mocked me in front of his intern-pupil (his assistant called Andre) - claiming that, before Covid, I, allegedly, had an appointment every 3 months (which contradicted to my claims and was not true), and I had no dates with

me, and, of course, could not adequately refute his allegations...


16 Nov. 2021

At 10:15, I was contacted by Dr. Rohan, who wanted to check if his measures worked for me.


I appreciated his efforts, and said that there no such altruistic doctors like him in out days.


29 Nov. 2021, Monday

At 13:30, I supposed to have an ultrasound (right lower neck - high shoulder) at St.-Mary's Hospital (1-st floor Ultrasound Department).


They kept me 2 and half hours waiting, while all other people waited no more than 15-30 min.


People, who came after 14:00, were called to the procedure, but not me.


If they arrived too late - they should go after me. But this was not the case.


They told that this was because patients from Emergency had a privilege to be called before anybody else - but only 1 women came from ER.


They also said that - in the computer - my appointment is marked as 13:55, but it was surely at 13:30, I have the telephone conversation recording.


DECEMBER 2021


2 Dec. 2021

Dr. Rohan had to see me at 10:00 in person in his office, instead of calling by phone, because he needed to see my dermatological problems (and cysts) himself; otherwise doctors-specialists did not want to deal with a new patient.


And because Dr. Demyttenaere did not expressed any opinion about the lesion on my shoulder, waiting for ultrasound's results, Dr. Rohan has assessed this problem as well, telling that it is not a lipoma, and not a tumor (as I suggested), but a cyst. The next ultrasound (late 2022) suggested a tumor, so, Dr. Rohan might be wrong. In Dr. Rohan's opinion, this lesion will disappear by itself. However, like Dr. Beatrice Wang, and 4 other doctors, who suggested the same about other lesions, and were wrong, he was wrong, too.


14 Dec. 2021

Blood-Urine Test at Verdun Hospital (13:30) - has turned into another conflict, and - also - was partially sabotaged.


When I came for the test, there were just few patients in the normally overcrowded waiting room - with up to 1 hundred or more people. I was perplexed - why it happened.


In the blood tests' room, where the nurses were taken the samples, all nurses were new, except of the senior nurse (a supervisor), a woman-Quebecer.


I was treating by a nice oriental (maybe, Indian or Pakistani) young nurse, who behaved polite and appropriate, but asked me too many questions. Normally, since the beginning of the era of the development of the mist vicious totalitarian surveillance and tyrannical control by the government, they ask patient's name, date of birth, and, sometimes, the telephone number. This time, in addition, I was asked about my wife's name, my father's and mother's names, about my home and cellular phone number, and wife's phone number, and my address. When I said that I do not have a cellular phone, and that my wife's phone number is her confidential information, which I cannot disclose without her consent, the young nurse started to insist, and also said that it cannot be true that someone in our days has no cellular phone. She also demanded (besides the street and apartment number) the postal code, and I told that I don't remember it, because I never send postal letters.


And, because the nurse, still, behaved politely, I did not dare to demand to explain - why she's asking so many strange questions, - but only asked her: OK, if I don't remember my postal code, and I don't have a cellular phone - then, what, they will deny me a blood test?


At this moment, another nurse, who was sitting in the neighboring armchair (an overweighed Muslim in her late 40-s or early 50-s, in a typical Muslim shawl on her head and neck) taking blood sample from another patient, burst in an aggressive and insulting scream, attacking me almost with her fists in an inexplicable anger.


She attacked me so violently and hostile as if I was her personal enemy or an enemy soldier on a battlefield.


Screaming, she ordered me to take off my dark eyeglasses and to show my face.


In spite of the aggression, I behaved very polite with her, remembering that a Muslim woman should never scream so fiercely at a man, and stunningly perplexed by her behavior. I just told her that I have serious eyes problems, and the eyeglasses are protecting my eye from the light aberrations.


But she started to scream at me even more violently, and "my" nurse, for unknown reasons, supported her colleague's demand to take off my eye-glasses. I did it, showing my eyes only to the nurse that was serving me, but not to her colleague, turning my back to her.


"My" nurse had no more demands, and manifested an intention to take the blood sample, finally, but another nurse just embittered even more, and even stood up from her seat, as if she was up to beat me, screaming at me that I must take off the anti-Covid mask as well - and to show my face.


To this, I answered now more firmly saying that she has no rights to demand this, and that, on the contrary, demanding to remove an anti-Covid mask within the hospital, she's exposing me to a danger of contamination, which is a criminal offence.


Now their supervisor, who was sitting in the couloir, intervened, and literary ordered the Muslim woman to shut up. The latter sniffed angrily, and run out of the room.


If I was not facing a Muslim woman, I would react more sharply, to repulse her inexplicable and unprovoked aggression, and - by that - defending myself from a stronger stress. However, my respect to Muslims, the supposition that they must sympathize with a case of privacy violation displaying their solidarity with victims of an offensive collection of biometric information, and my ethical setting taking into consideration their elevated sensitivity in the concerning situations, prevented me from such a reaction, and this was the reason (as I suggest) of heart pain, when I was returning home.


When I described this incident to one of my friends, he proposed the next hypothesis.


According to him, Covid and "anti-Covid" vaccines were created in a lab for the goal of 1) human genetic code modification; 2) elimination of the natural immune response and development of population's dependence from the state (from the governmental vaccination); and 3) global experiment with the modification of DNA for the benefit of the world elite, which is dreaming to become immortal (only half percent of the world population).


The government is looking for measures to include people, who somehow evaded both vaccination and Covid, into the same experiment, and, for this purpose, they inject something into patients' bloodstream when taking blood samples in a lab, or, at least, they take blood of people immune to Covid for special research.


This, he said, completely explains what happened to me. If I found the Lab's waiting room almost deserted, he pointed, this indicates that the most of the population in Verdun was aware of the dirty experiments, which the government was doing in Verdun Hospital's Lab. And people stopped visiting this hospital for blood tests.


The whole lab's staff, he pointed, "disappeared", and a completely new staff was hired to work in this lab. What does in means? - he asked. - Only that the previous staff did not want to be used for dirty experiments, and left this job.


Concluding from all above mentioned, he summarized, the identification of patients becomes extremely important, especially for all these fanatics-lunatics, who stand behind waste inhuman experiments in the Anglo-Saxons' labs around the world. If they are very interested in putting individuals, who never had Covid, and, in the same time, never accepted vaccination, under the scrutiny of comprehensive experiments, or, as minimum, in obtaining their blood samples (without patients' consent) for some sort of research, they will make provisions for verifying such patients' identity with all totalitarian punctuality (especially when big money is involved).


I don't have moral rights to support or to contest his allegations within the frames of this particular work. However, I equally have no moral right to conceal this opinion, regarding many factors (not just the freedom of expression).


Anyway, the conflict in Verdun Hospital's lab (14-12-2021) left a very sinister after-taste. And a very strange - untypical - behavior of the Muslim woman (the nurse) is just one of hundreds shades of the picture. Something really scary stands behind it.


I felt that this weird incident in Verdun Hospital's Laboratory is just a beginning of something wider: for example, of the disappearance of this test completely, or some of its parts.


And I was right in my suspicions.


First of all, this test's more complete report was available in the database only after 2 weeks of its absence, while normally a blood-urine test is available in 1-3 (maximum 4!) days. Some of its data appeared already on 17 Dec. 2021, but several sections were missing. 2 components were added after 26 of Dec., 2021, but the urine test was always missing, in exception of the 2 abnormal indexes: density, and hemoglobin.


Other abnormal indexes were: Creatinine and blood in the urine sample.


Only later the urine test appeared in the database, but backdated.


21 Dec. 2021

Sample for the f. immune test delivered.


15 Dec. 2021

Dr. Demiteneren [Sebastian V. Demyttenaere] (St.-Mary's Hospital's outpatient clinic's surgeon - room 14) was supposed to see me at 8:30, but another - a new - conflict has developed at the entrance of the medical pavilion at 3777 rue Jean-Brilliant.


The security guard - a high black guy - demanded to replace my anti-Covid mask with provided by him hospital mask.


I said that I have no confidence in the hospital mask, and that my mask is brand-new, and I did not remove or lowered it before coming to the hospital.


However, this guard (a 32-34 y.o. man) did not want to listen.


Then I said that I'm going to replace the mask, which I am wearing, by another - new - mask from a brand-new (sealed!) pack in the original packing, which I have with me.


However, the guard was stone-stubborn, insisting on the formality no matter what.


No argument (that, for example, he is giving me a mask without the cover, which is not sterile anymore, while I want to pull out a mask from a new sterile pack) were accepted by him.


Finally, I said that I am leaving, and that all the consequences and the damage to my health caused by the blocked access to the doctor will be on this cruel and tyrannical practice of illogical twisted mask policy.


In that moment, one of the white nurses that stood near the second - internal - door, also serving as guards of the mask policy, has approached me, and told that - OK - I can enter the clinic, but I must, firstly, to change the mask that I am wearing to a new mask, which I have with me, and, secondly, to put the hospital mask on top of my own new mask.


I agreed to her conditions, and complied, being allowed to enter the clinic.


However, inside, after passing 2 secretaries and registering my visit, I was approached by a woman, who started to ask me weird questions, and behaved like a policeman. Then another woman in the white gown approached me with similar wild questions.


It is very likely that the 2 women were a team of the governmental servants (doctors or social workers, or etc.), whose function is to enforce the pathologization of decent and to crash any resistance to all neo-totalitarian tendencies.


When I, finally, entered the room number 14 (not really a room, not really an office, but a segregated by glass walls cube), Dr. Demiteneren [Sebastian V. Demyttenaere] was not alone, but with a young-looking woman in civil clothing, and in a Muslim shawl on her head. There was no identification card on her.


I asked Dr. Demiteneren [Sebastian V. Demyttenaere] if she is not a policewoman, a psychiatrist, or a social worker, explaining that - before seeing him, - I had a conflict with the guard, and, in such occasions, they use the practice of pathologization of any disagreement with governmental agents or the governmental policy.


The woman was very confused, but Dr. Demyttenaere has comforted her, stepping right to her and surprisingly frivolously supported her by rubbing her back (or by some other movement: I don't remember exactly), and declared that she is a trainee (an intern), and belongs to the same medical domain as he himself.


However, the young women became even more confused, and no sign confirmed that he was telling the truth. On the contrary, her reaction would provoke a suspicion in anyone that she is a good person, who is feeling the pangs of remorse because of forced to do something that contradicts her code of ethics.


When I asked her (through Dr. Demyttenaere) - what she things about my problem, she became even more tangled, not able to say anything, and surely knowing nothing about my case.


Then I asked if she has an identification card or in ID, which proves that she's a surgeon, Dr. Demyttenaere did not let her to speak, and, again, rejected my insinuations as completely groundless. The young women, in her turn, has made an attempt to leave this small glass cube (called "room number 14"), but Dr. Demyttenaere comforted her again, did not let her to do anything, and - again - rejected my demands.


And, finally, I said that I am against the presence of other people in the room during the appointment with Dr. Demyttenaere, but he just ignored my declaration.


After the development of the above mentioned ethical conflict - I did not want to speak with Dr. Demyttenaere anymore. He violated the basic rights of a patient, first, by not asking patient's consent (allowance) for the presence of strangers (of extraneous persons) during the appointment; secondly, by not providing a clear identification of the person, who was present in the room; and, thirdly, when I disagreed with presence of the intern (or whoever she was), he, still, ignored my declaration of non-consent.


I did not leave the "cube" right away just for seeing - what will happen then; and Dr. Demyttenaere did not assessed me, did not even asked me to remove my winter jacket; he only said that he finds the removal of the lesion on my lower right neck (higher shoulder) unnecessary, and that's all. When I asked him about the nature of the lesion - concretizing my question by asking if it is a cyst, a lipoma, or a tumor, - he could say nothing. I just asked him if he really saw the ultrasound's report, and he said affirmatively. However, I doubt it, if for no other reasons then for the ultrasound's report's date (by then, only a preliminary report was ready).


Dr. Demyttenaere's primary obligation was - at least - to diagnose the nature of the lesion by physically assessing it, but he did nothing.


If he was perplexed by my disagreement to have another person in the "room" - then he had 3 options: 1) to send the intern away; 2) to clear up her identity, by showing her ID card or a student card (if she was a student; because she looked a bit older than an overage student); or 3) to administrate another appointment. However, he did nothing.


Thus, he certainly violated the normative protocols and the ethical code, and contributed to complications, which this lesion later developed.


CHAPTER 5. January-December 2022.


2022


JANUARY, 2022


6 Jan. 2022

At 9.30, I had another call from Dr. Rohan (my family doctor).


I wished him a Happy New Year, and good luck for him and his family, and to thanked for everything that he did for me.


Unfortunately, I had to raise a question about Access Sante and RAMQ web sites' sabotage, which are blocking my access to my personal medical data since mid-December, and turned to Doctor Rohan for help.


I stressed that I need to see my last blood-urine and immune test, and ultrasound, pointing that this is my essential right and the cornerstone of my mental security, because if I am discriminated in accessing this data, then the whole medical help is insecure for me in general.


Then I told about the fact that - after 2 urological surgeries - I don't have a urologist. (Dr. Rohan told months ago that Dr. El-Hakim has passed away). Every bladder emptying followed by 3-5 min. of leaking drops. Since September, 2021, the time increased to 5-8 min. sometimes, and it wet the pants. Also: painful urination. Flomax did not bring any benefits. Interruption and urgency disappeared without Flomax, which I took just 1 week, and stopped. Proscar-Finasteride provoked described in the instructions side effects, and I stopped it immediately, but I am ready to try again without Flomax. I just needed Doctor Rohan's advice.


(Running forward: I found alternative remedies, not medications form a pharmacy, which - for a long period of time - removed all described problems).


I was also speaking about the arthritis. The back and hips pain meanwhile became a real problem, restricting my movements and even functionality. Sometimes not just pain, but an inability to move. When I'm taking Celebrex, the pain disappears, but this medication is not harmless for the cardiovascular system.


I remind him that we discussed an X-Ray of the back and pelvic bones, but I did not receive any call yet.


Now, I had a new problem: pain underneath the appendix suture scar tissue, sometimes a considerable pain.


I also said that the issue with the ophthalmologist is still actual.


For 2 years I only formally have an ophthalmologist, who told me repeatedly 4 times to look for another doctor, but I am persona non-grata in McGill ophthalmological clinics. All McGill doctors rejected me. Dr. Lesk is a good doctor and a relatively ethical person, but he is not taking into consideration my socioeconomic situation and the persecution by the government, and the sabotage of the appointments by the secretary staff, and this puts my vision under a threatening danger.


25 Jan. 2022

A massive bleeding in the left eye occurred.

However, it was absolutely impossible to see Dr. Lesk.


FEBRUARY, 2022


1 Feb. 2022

At 10.15, Dr. Rohan called again, to discuss same problems.


21 - 23 Feb. 2022 - Monday-Wednesday

Several weird events in the metro and buses, which gave a suspicion that someone is planning to infect me with Covid or other infections, have put me on alert.

Also, since Monday, I noticed traces of some weird changes in my apartment. All my "tags" were violated, and I found a container with medications, which supposed to be in a very different packing.


A similar incident happened, when my wife, and me: we went to see the New Year with our close ones (31 Jan. 2021), and stayed there overnight.


When we came back home, not just the web computer was put out of action, but all my "tags" were displaced.


In one of the drawers I keep medications, and, among them, it was one that they give in the pharmacy in a small cardboard box, which has inside a plastic packing.


The day before I pulled out this packing, and have thrown away the cardboard box.


When, 1 Jan. 2022, we returned home, this packing was absent in the drawer. However, when I began to hung up the clothing into the wardrobe, a brand new box of the same medication has fallen out from there.


On 17 Feb. 2022, a 58 or 62 y.o. plumber-subcontractor, hired by the municipal office, came to do a planned routine replacement of the w.c. lavatory pan (toilet). We had a very expensive toilet-sit, which I removed and placed into the bath-tube behind the curtain. We also had an exclusive handle for water-drain. He carried away with him the both, and I could not understand - how I did not see it. Instead of our expensive sit, he installed a defective irregular sit, which, probably, he took somewhere himself at a storage of non-condition things.


When - from time to time - I tried to see what he is doing in the toilet room, he - darkly and viciously - slammed the door in my face!


However, because there is not too much air there, and he was performing a physical work, he had to open the door slightly, and I noticed that he did something strange: he placed some strange tube against the lavatory pan, and did other unclear operations.


But the most important that he behaved very aggressively and spitefully - without any reason.


It cannot be a coincident that a week later (exactly) I got a strange infection, which could even kill me.


When he left, I did not go out, but in 2 or 3 hours I decided to take a walk, and, when I exited from my apartment, I saw a piece of paper, which was slipped behind the door-handle. It was an absolutely white-clean piece of paper, without any writing or marks.


I immediately returned home, and carefully washed my hands, but, unfortunately, because I was wearing a winter jacket (which I did not want to undress), maybe, I washed my hands not ultimately perfectly.


On 22 or 23 Feb. 2022, when I was returning home from the street, I found a similar white list of paper behind the door-handle.


24 Feb. 2022, Thursday

Pain in all muscles, bones, joints.

Diarrhea, headache, dizziness.

Fever, trembling of the whole body, hands, head, shoulders.

Temperature - 39.

Covid Test - negative.

It cannot be accidently that this contaminative disease started on 24 Feb. 2022 - exactly on the day of dramatic events in Ukraine: when a military conflict between Kiev and Moscow blew up. 24 Feb. 2022 - is the beginning of the crazy war; and on 24 Feb. 2022 I fell sick with a suspicious unknown viral or bacterial infection.

If not dozens of very similar incidents - it could be just a hypothesis, but such a huge number of "coincident" "parallels" (partially described in this work) points to an obvious set up.


25 Feb. 2022, Friday

Bladder, canal, uterus - all very painful. Dry blood clots in urine. Urgency, frequency, interruption.

Headache when putting head down.

Fever, trembling of the whole body, hands, head, shoulders.

Temperature - 39.

Covid Test - negative.


No doubts about the purposeful contamination of my body through food, other substances (like something that possible to inhale), or objects. Not only that the beginning of this infection coexisted (by its date 24 Feb. 2022) with the beginning of the crazy war between Kiev and Moscow on 24 Feb. 2022, but dozens of similar suspicious viral or bacterial infections in similar situations prompt about a possible terrorist act.


On 25 Feb. 2022, I sent emails to some of my friends, describing the situation and stressing that I am having no opinion about the military conflict between Kiev and Moscow, and never expressed my view of the situation between Kiev and Moscow on personal level or publicly. I have a suspicion that I am targeted because of my criticism of a completely different state (a pseudo-country), which regime is very involved into the events in Ukraine: if the infection disease, which break out on 24 Feb. 2022 (right on the day when the war started), is not a coincident.


26 Feb. 2022, Saturday

Fever, fresh blood in urine.

Temperature - 39.

No muscles-bones-joints pain any more.

Covid Test - negative.


I am calling my family doctor every day, but his office phone is not accessible.


27 Feb. 2022, Sunday

More blood in urine.

Urgency, frequency, interruption and most of the pain - disappear.

Temperature - 38.


MARCH, 2022


1 Mar. 2022, Tue.

The infection continues to evolve, threatening to affect other internal organs, like kidney.


Finally, I reached my family doctor's secretary on the phone.


Dr. Rohan administrated an urgent blood-urine test, which requisition my wife took from his office, and I passed the lab tests in our CLSC, but not on rue Centre.


Now, the final conclusions depend on the result of the tests. If there is a recurrence of the known and already ravaged for many years, enterococci infection: it is one thing; but if the tests will reveal a new infection, never detected in me by all previous tests: then the verdict is that I was deliberately infected - without any doubts.


4 Mar. 2022, Friday

My family doctor has administrated antibiotics, because the tests detected the Escherichia coli infection, more than 100,000 bact/mL. Besides, the blood and leucocytes were over the roof (++).


This test confirmed all suspicions and strangeness, because in no way I could catch such a specific infection accidently. In January-February 2022 I did not meet people. I was seeing ONLY the members of my family, and none of them had a UTI, and, especially, an acute infection. The Escherichia coli is infecting ONLY people, who have many contacts with other people, or living in the anti-sanitary conditions. I am living in the ideal sanitary conditions, and, if I go out, or must use public transportation, I am taking all precautions and all possible preventive measures.


Also the fact that the acute stage has started on the day of a major geopolitical military conflict hints - in my case - that I was deliberately infected.


(See below the test's report's copy)


Other symptoms, not related to the acute UTI, also prompt that there was not only 1 infectious organism, but more, and this suggest a deliberate infection as well.


From here, it is possible to go retrospectively to the events on 1 Jan. 2001, when I was infected by an acute UTI by the 1-st time. It happened also on a key date: on the 1-st day of the new millennium, and in the year of 9-11 terrorist acts. It also happened in the midst of my conflict with Immigration Medical Services, when Immigration fabricated a false "tubercular" diagnosis to topple my immigration procedure. By then, Immigration officials and Immigration doctors have threatened me by a "venereal" disease (see in this work the details).


Immigration is, basically, same enforcement agency as police or secret services, and, theoretically, capable to use an extrajudicial punishment of innocent people.


My previous hypothesis, displayed in 2 first parts (books) of this work, suggested that the Immigration officers and doctors skillfully used the suggestive technic, threatening me by a venereal or urological infection in the midst of persecutions, stresses, intimidation attacks, and so on, or, in other words, doing all conventional tricks to weaken my organism by repressions, simultaneously menacing by an infection. In such a situation, the immune system becomes unstable, and, after a smart psychological terrorist threat, the body infects itself when a harmless bacterium, which lives in healthy people, starting to cause big problems.


However, now, taking into consideration all later events, it is possible to see the bizarre development in 2000-2001 retrospectively through the glass of the whole later experience, which pushes to a conclusion that even in 2001 Canadian or foreign agents could physically infect me by a substance or an object, and then sabotaged the rendering of medical treatment.


6 Mar. 2022, Sunday

Dr. Rohan called me at 9.30, and, as it appeared, he could do nothing else for me. Regarding the former urological drama and 2 urological surgeries, remaining problems, recurrences of the previous syndromes and symptoms, and - now - another acute UTI with a "new" bacteria, mysteriously affected such a person as I am (living in the ideal sanitary conditions): under all civilized standards and regulations, I have a right to be accepted by a urologist as a patient. However, since 2017, I am denied a urologist. It can happen exclusively due to politization of health care, and the repressive nature of the modern medical domain.


The picture of "medical persecutions" cannot be correctly viewed while isolated and taken out from the broader picture of totalitarian surveillance, oppression, and control, and must be seen as an integral part of the complex repressive practices, which include police intimidation; administrative pressure; various provocations and attacks; digital terror; and other terror methods.


In our digital era a disconnection of someone's Internet-access and phone is equal to a house arrest, and my phone and Internet used to be SYSTEMATICALLY disconnected for days or even weeks, and I NEVER received any compensation.


In our digital era no one can live without the search engines' information, which is essentially crucial for everyday life; for financial, administrative, customer's, social, professional, and even health issues and needs. But the most important of the search engines block me an access, or block information since 1998!


No one is attacked by so many computer viruses and so many times. Literary thousands of viruses have been sent to my computers since 1995, including such as root worms, which are basically used by militaries or by the secret services, not by ordinary hooligans or hackers. I was attacked by computer viruses through emails, web pages, or while downloading things. Computer viruses were sent by my Internet-providers, by well-known web sites (including governments' portals), by anti-virus software producers, or by other software hosts, by search engines, or by online vendors, and so on. The structures, which claim that they fight "Internet-terrorism", are terrorists themselves, who use the terrorist methods to "neutralize" any dissent.


Their special "military" computer viruses destroyed several of my computers; my personal databases (personal photos; music; my literary works; correspondence; home videos; etc.); 2 or 3 monitors, and other devices; and so on.


When - after a next vicious computer viruses' attack - I used to look for inexpensive computer parts, or peripheral devices, - I was surveilled and prevented from buying what I needed the most.


For example, when - in the beginning of 2000-s - the video-card of the motherboard has burned due to a virus attack, I decided to buy a video card for a free slot, to have an alternative monitor connection.


I received information about inexpensive video cards in one the computer stores from one of my friends, who was buying computer pieces for his business.


However, when I came into this store, I saw a worker, who was removing this exactly type of video cards from the glass shelves. I asked him - what he is doing, and he responded that he is removing "non-condition" video cards to a storage. When I told him that I will buy such an allegedly "defective" video card, he said that the card is "not for sale".


When I needed memory cards, and went to a computer store, I met an acquaintance, who told me that bought the same memory card (which I needed) and told that "they have a lot of them". However, when I asked about this memory card, I was told that they don't have them.


Once, when I was buying an inexpensive internal burner near St.-Catherine - Aylmer, and gave a 20 can. dollars bill, I received a change as if I paid by 10 dollars. I was absolutely sure that I gave 20 dollars (I looked carefully), and called the police. Two police officers came (two policewomen), who looked into the video recording, and told that it is not clear, by what bill I was paying. Something fishy was in their conclusion, which doesn't mean automatically that the police officers were not telling the truth. It is possible that the store did some trick, but, unfortunately, the further investigation was not in the police's competence.


Running forward: in January - February 2023, I drastically needed an external hard drive around 1 terabyte, to put an additional operation system in this disk, but our financial resources are so restricted that even such a purchase is too expensive for us. Fortunately, I received an information from one of my friends, who told me that he saw such hard drives for 60 - 70 dollars at the computer store in downtown (488 St.-Catherine West). My wife gave me a lift till Montagne - Rene-Levesque, and I went from there to the store.


On my way, I noticed 2 parked police cars 20-4 and 20-5, which - in the past - have intercepted and escorted me, but this time it might be just a coincident. However, the 3-rd police car (also near the Bishop street) - a black vehicle (SPVM 20-3) - could be there for me, the more so that this car was also noticed several times in the past involved into surveillance. 25 or 35 minutes later the same black police car (20-3) intercepted my way at Beaver Hall and Belmont, which is a different area (far away (for a pedestrian) from Bishop Street), and that points to its possible surveillance mission. On February 9, 2023, the same black SPVM police car 20-3 (or its imitation) was placed between 2 opposite lanes: on my way (on a bus) from Laval to Terrebonne. (There were also 4 other police cars, placed in the traditional for the road police operations' spaces: 3 police cars, and 1 "civil"). Potentially, another car, a red Hyundai FSF6576, with an unknown logo and the digit "3", could be also used for spying, because one of the cars with the same logo was parked near my home for months, and was also noticed passing the Metro station in my area at the exact moment, when I used to come home. Potentially, an Amazon minibus, Ford FRY8024 440356, could also be used for spying on me, not only because there is a commonly known opinion that Amazon's delivery minibuses are used for spying on citizens, but, in addition, because this particular bus was spotted 3 more times in key points and at key situations.


Walking from Bishop street to Fillips Square, I spotted 2 walking spies, who were so demonstratively following me that even a child would notice it: 1 - an "overage" body shape young man 26-28 y.o., my height or a bit higher; and the 2-nd - a bold man, an agile 52-53 y.o. rather a bit lean person of my height. The 1-st escorted me from Bishop street to Metcalfe, and, as soon as he remarked that he has been uncovered by me, he pulled out a mobile phone: supposedly, calling his colleague to take over the relay. The 2-nd was waiting at the corner of St.-Catherine - Union - and Fillips Square, walking to and fro on the same place, and speaking on the phone. When I approached, he departed from the West corner of the square to its East side (to rue Union), waited there until I reached him, and, letting me passing, went after me. Certainly, suggesting that I'll enter the Best Buy computer-electronics store on St.-Catherine, he stopped, walked to the curb of the pavement, and placed himself precisely against the store entrance, continuing to speak on the phone.


The computer store at St.-Catherine 488 (next to Best Buy to the West) had no street number (on its front wall), no store's name: only an add that here they run the reparation services. Still, even such a commerce must have a name!


At the entrance, it was something like a control check-point, with an internal booth or sentry-box - like at some parking lots, and - in the window of this glass booth - a check-guard was sitting behind a laptop computer. Two light bars were blocking up the way for a visitor: everything for creating an impression on somebody that this is a store like Costco, which you are allowed to enter exclusively with a membership card, or with a warranty document, which allows you to use the warranty reparation service.


This is why I asked the guy at the entrance if the access to this store is free, and if they not just provide the reparation services, but also sell products... like... (here I stammered, intuitively feeling that I don't have to give out instantly what I need, but my lips automatically continued) ... hard drives...


He said that this is a "normal computer store", and I can go and see the devices.


Inside, I gazed at laptops, and other devices and appliances, which had no prices indications (in particular, the laptops).


Then, I spotted the same guy from the entrance (a full-bodied white young man with a beard and long heir on the back), who approached an Asian-looking corpulent male vendor (younger than the door-guard), and told him something, whispering right in the letter's ear. This employer instantly took something from a shelf - and took it to a backroom.


When I walked around the glass shelfs in the middle of the store not seeing any hard disks, I came to the bureau-counter bar with 3 vendors near or behind it, intended to ask about the hard drives, but the same Asian-looking young man surpassed me asking what I need. I told him, and he - specifying if I need an internal, or an external hard drive - then pointed to some small cardboard boxed hanging on the wall. Even a person with an excellent vision could not read anything from such a distance, and the prices were deliberately presented so unintelligibly and with dark letter-and-digits on the dark background that nobody could read them.


Instead of showing me a 1 terabyte external HD, he started to ask me if I need "just a link, or a "whole thing". I understood nothing, and he restated it in a different way, asking about SSD-s. Even when he realized that, for some reasons, I am not familiar with the abbreviation "SSD" (because I was keeping asking about the external HARD DRIVE), he continued to use this term, intentionally confusing me. When he was specifying if I need an internal, or an external hard drive, he did not used the "SSD" abbreviation, and this clearly pointed that he was purposefully insulting and baffling me. I understood that he is just mocking on me very rudely and cynically, and asked him with a stressing underlining if they have a 1 terabyte external hard drive and how much it costs. He told that the price is 90+ dollars. When I said that this is too expensive, he responded that they don't have less expensive ext. hard drives of the same category, and, pointing at an empty space (strangely empty: as if the items were just removed!) at the shelf - between two very densely stacked places - added that people buy up such items very quickly, and that no one is left. However, I recalled before my eyes the place, from which this guy took away the items on the "entrance guy" order, and it corresponded to this particular place with 80 per cent accuracy.


If I am not falling within the remaining 20 per cents, then there are only 2 feasible versions: 1) the "doorman" has received a call from people, who were behind the surveillance from Bishop Street to Fillips Square, and they ordered to remove the inexpensive ext. HD-s; and 2) this store is selling the extra deficit (like things sold for very affordable prices) exclusively to members of some hidden club. However, it does not exclude that the both possibilities have coincided.


If I am right, this gives an idea - how a huge terror machine of Canadian and foreign governments are working for terrorizing the ordinary people.


Going back to the whole sequence of events (see above), it is important to tell that - on my way FROM Terrebonne - the police and the Suret guards have watched me closely at the Montmorency Bus-Metro station, and, in the metro train, 2 people dressed as some technical workers in an indoor bluish uniform (one with an agenda lists on a solid plate; another with a strange device) were performing some tests. The man with a device was holding a gadget composed of a huge isolated microphone and a scale-indicator below the microphone. It was suggestable that they are testing the noise or loudspeakers' decibels' level (if, for example, the STM received complains that the announcements in the wagons are dangerously loud for human ears). However, the chronology of their appearance precisely when I was traveling inside this particular train may signify that they were sent at an exact special time to play on my nerves. (If it is not something more sinister than that).


On 10 Feb. 2023, 2 Bell's vehicles (a special minibus and a track) appeared near my home, and the workers have started some important installation. There was the word "fiber optic" among other words on the cars. The worker, who lifted himself to the height of the 2-strayed building, has hung something like a laptop at one of the street cables-cords. It was a black case, which the worker opened like a laptop, with the higher part as a screen, and the lower part as a keyboard. I had an impression that he is typing on the lower part, looking at the higher part as at a monitor. He had 2 big bags-sacks, one red (more firm), and one blue, which he attached to his moving cabin. In the process of some manipulations, he was pulling out some smaller modem-sized boxes, and also connected the hanging "laptop" with a wire to something at his feet. He was also listening to something, bringing his ear very close to the source of the sounds.


At the end, he closed the hanging "laptop", and left, together with the whole Bell's team.


The black "laptop" device is installed precisely against the 3 windows of our apartment, exactly in the middle. I don't remember seeing any similar black rectangular "closed laptop-looking" box hanging on the cables on 2 almost white "clothes-peg" clips anywhere in the city. If nothing similar does presents anywhere, and it will be confirmed, it means that the authorities just installed a new spying device, which will monitor the whole apartment and everything that occurs inside it, including everything that I do on my computers, because the modern technologies are capable to do it. If this "laptop" will be removed after days, weeks, or months: it will indicate that the authorities have collected everything they needed, and stopped the wiretapping operation, for sure.


In the light of all above mentioned, the medical persecutions are seeing like a part of a bigger picture of totalitarization and politization of all spheres of life.


10 Mar. 2022

10.45 - Dr. Rohan - cancelled.


16 Mar 2022

Since 8.30 - sudden stomach pain - as never happened for 10-15 years with no reason.


The pain started right after the breakfast; nothing bothered me before.


I was drinking just café, and ate oatmeal. That's all.


No reason for stomach pain.


Another detail: the stomach and low intestine pain started simultaneously, but only of the right side of the body, which could suggest the bile spread. However, I slept on the left side.


The feeling and the type of pain after the breakfast was as if I drunk some acid. Was it some kind of a chemical poisoning-burn?


The pain lasted the whole day, and repeated several days in a row, and, then, in next 2 weeks occurred from time to time again and again.


APRIL, 2022


4 Apr. 2022, Monday

On 4 Apr. 2022, I visited an optometrist at 1606 Sherbrook Ouest, corner Guy (11:30).

The IOP was abnormal again.


7 Apr. 2022

Dr. Lesk - 10:20 (see the details in "Who Destroyed My Vision and Hearing").


MAY, 2022


3 May 2022, Tue.

Dr. Rohan - ?


12 May 2022, Thursday

When I met my friend David (9:00, Atwater Market), we were closely watched by police.


18 May 2022, Wednesday

Dr. Rohan called me at 9:15 (as always: minute in minute; not like other doctors!).


I presented my questions and requests, as the following:


1. A referral to Dr. Viviott.

2. A requisition for a spinal-pelvic X-Ray, and Blood-Urine test, because all tests, done with previous requisitions, have disappeared.

3. A question about Finasteride: how long should I take it? (Running forward: I took it during a very short time, and dropt - because of the dangerous side effects).

4. Since a mysterious illness, which outbreak has started on 24 Feb. 2022, I have muscles pain, pulse rate increased from 60 to 75-80 per second, and a new vascular problem with low limbs appeared. My both legs are swollen at evening and numbed after sitting more than 20 min. Muscles' pain even prevent me from playing piano. It is very suspicious that an unknown infectious disease was combined with E.-coli (Escherichia), which is widely used in biotechnology. If possible, I would like to have an ultrasound (both Duplex and Double Doppler technique) of the whole left and right leg from top buttocks to the bottom of the feet.

5. Referral to Dr. Poliquen.


Dr. Rohan has satisfied all other requests, in exception of Duplex-Double-Doppler US of both legs, which mean that the taboo for such an exam is still in force after I was hit by car in 2007, and the System started to frame and cover up the driver of that car...


JUNE, 2022


7 June 2022, Tue.

Dr. Rohan call me again precisely at 9:30.


Again, I presented my questions and requests, as the following:


1) Dr. Rohan supposed to leave the blood-urine tests' requisition on the door, but it wasn't there.

Dr. Rohan is a very disciplined and responsible person. So, I suggested that someone just pulled it out from the door - and took away. "As you know, - I told Dr. Rohan - the blood test from 14 Dec. 2021 - disappeared. The last blood test was done on 20 Jul. 2020, 2 years ago. Supporting the proof that you, Doctor, promised to leave the blood-urine requisition on the door, I can play your secretary's message that she left on the answering machine". - Dr. Rohan has confirmed that his secretary has left the requisition on the door, indeed. I needed such a test even more now, because, as I suspected - again - blood in urine, risen glucose, cholesterol, and other hematological factors issues became essential. There are also supposed to be psa, strum creatinine, liver profile, and rheumatology (including uric acid) in the vanished blood test.


2) Dr. Viviott is on maternity leave, so, I need a referral to another dermatologist, who accept and respect the RAMQ card.


He promised to call back at 10:30 again, and to try solving these problems.


Dr. Rohan did not call at 10:30. I called his office at 12:00.


He spoke to me with a confused tone, admitting that he put the blood-urine requisition on the door, so, it was stolen indeed.


He invited me to his office tomorrow.


8 Jun, 2022, Wednesday

10:45 - Dr. Rohan - in his office.


I was stunned that the doctor "forgot" about the blood test, and everything ABOUT the blood test. Knowing Dr. Rohan for years, I was sure that he has no age-related amnesia or memory problems. Thus, an only possible reason for him to "forget" completely about this issue is fear. Probably, everything was so serious that it became for him an only solution.


I had to render some pressure to receive another (new) requisition for blood-urine test, instead of one that was stolen from the door. Dr. Rohan asked again - how much time passed since the last blood test.


22 June, 2022, Wed.

10:00 - Blood Test at CLSC Bois de Boulogne.


Only I alone was asked to tell my home phone number; only my medical card was taken away, and I had to demand it twice (before and after the procedure), stressing that the RAMQ card should be given back. Otherwise, the staff (the secretaries and nurses were very nice and polite women) would not return it to me.


On my way home, I was stopped and interrogated by STM Police at Acadie Metro Station. One of the 2 officers (the lower one) is known to me. He appeared many times near me in different Metro stations, and once even stopped me.


I have an idea - why it happened.


It, probably, happened because, on my way to the Lab, I went out from a different Metro station, and used a different bus, which was a more rational way. Now, I took another bus with a longer route, which goes to a Metro station, which demands for me 2 transfers, not 1. Actually, I took another bus because did not want to wait too long for the next "best" bus, but the police or other agencies that monitor my movements, could take it for an attempt to disappear from their view.


Near home (after exiting the Metro) I was followed by 3 known to me spies (toptuny), including the young black lame man. This last, was standing behind me (I did not see him), when - on my way from the Metro - photographed the Amazon bus, potentially spying on me.


After all these draconian totalitarian events: can I trust the lab tests' results?


23 June, 2022, Thursday

11-45 - Ultrasound, X-Ray.


The same secretary-nurse again said that I have no appointment today. And she behaved firm in not letting me to pass the ultrasound.


If another secretary (probably, her supervisor) would not contested her colleague position, and would not point by the finger that my appointment is registered in the book, I could be left without ultrasound (with the X-Ray - it is different: as no appointment is needed).


This was the 3-rd time, when the same situation has repeated in this radiology. And all 3 times the same woman has blocked my way to radiology tests. It is a key to understand the mechanism of oppression - how it works.


This woman is certainly a police informer, or she works for secret services, or for another sinister enforcement organization.


On 10 April 2020 (Friday), the same provocateur (nearly low white woman - possibly, a Quebecer - normal body shape, in her late 40-s or mid 50-s) also tried to block me an access to medical images' services, when I came to Cote des Neiges Radiological Center (booking an appointment in advance); by then, she also told me that she did not find my name anywhere, and that I must go home: because I, allegedly, have no appointment, and, so, will not be allowed to do the X-Ray.


She just refused to listen to my statement that I BOOKED an appointment, and that, besides, an X-Ray is not an ultrasound, and must be done even without an appointment, according to the law.


Then another secretary came in, and, hearing the end of the dispute, quickly found my name and the inscription of my appointment.


The incident on July 12, 2021, is shading more light on government's, secret services', and secret societies' cover operations inside medical institutions.


I already described - how, booking an appointment in advance (for 10 April 2020 (Friday), I came with an X-Ray requisition from my family doctor to Cote des Neiges Radiological Center, and one of the secretaries told me that she cannot find my name anywhere, and, thus - I must go home: because, allegedly, I have no appointment, and, so, will not be allowed to do the X-Ray.


She just refused to listen my statement that I BOOKED an appointment, and that, besides, an X-Ray is not an ultrasound, and must be done even without an appointment, according to the law.


Then another secretary came in, and, hearing the end of the dispute, quickly found my name and the inscription of my appointment.


On July 20, 2021, when I came at 10:15 to 53000 Cote des Neiges (Bureau 600) for another cyst's ultrasound (the situation demanded to repeated it), my appointment for an ultrasound was - again - sabotaged by the same lady.


I was told on the phone that my appointment is on 20 Jul. 2021, at 10:15.


My wife listened to the recording, and also heard: 10:15.


However, when I came and showed my RAMQ card, 2 female secretaries said that there is no any appointment for me on 20 July 2021.


I started to argue with them, insisting that I HAVE an appointment, that I recorded the conversation with the secretary, and that it was told clearly: 20 July 2021, at 10:15.


They replied that, probably, I made an appointment not to their bureau, but at "another place". I challenged it, insisting that I am sure that I have an appointment at this particular location.


They said that it cannot be so, and advised me to go home.


But I still insisted on my today"s appointment, saying that I called one of 2 phone numbers indicated on the requisition paper, and received the appointment date and time while speaking with this telephone number.


The second secretary, who was sitting (another one was standing), has started to call somewhere, to verify if my appointment was booked with "them". At this moment, I turned away, approaching the elevators to leave the radiology, but the secretaries called me, and I went back to the desk. The one that was standing, was pointed to her colleague and to the journal with her finger, saying that my appointment was there indeed, but was registered in a weird way.


However, they said that my appointment is not at 10 a.m., but at 5:00 (17:00) p.m.


Now, no argument that: 1) it was not mine, but their error; 2) I already spent money to come there; 3) for a fasting patient, an appointment time is supposed to be in the morning; 4) I am already fasting since yesterday, and they have no rights to extend it for another day, while it is contraindicated due to my health issues; and 5) if even it would be my mistake, they had to find me a niche in the morning due to their moral, humanitarian, ethical, and situational obligations - helped: I was sent home without an ultrasound.


When I came back at 17:00, I waited 1 hour and 20 minutes, in spite of my demand to accelerate my ultrasound test, because I already came in the morning, and I am fasting 2 days.


Coming home, I listened to the recording again, and discovered that the secretary announced 2 contradictive appointment times: ones she said that the appointment is at 10, then that the appointment is at 17:00.


My wife also heard the recording, and confirmed that the secretary just made a mistake. It was the same nearly low white secretary, who's trying to sabotage my appointment again.


When I obtained the ultrasound report, it was indicated that I passed the test at 17:15; but it was not true, because I came at 17:00, and was called for the test around 18:25.


This represented just another sample of medical institutions' arbitrariness: they do what they want, they randomly change the date, the time, the data, and there is no supervision and no mechanisms to protect patients" rights.


JULY, 2022


13 July, 2022. Wednesday

10.30 - Dr. Rohan - same problems... no solutions... Dr. Rohan told me (the second time) that he is retiring in December 2022.


25 Jul., 2022. Mon.

19.30 - Dr. Roi, the dentist.

He said that cannot replace or take away the useless dentures.

They are absolutely unfit for me.

When I told Dr. Roi that - with all the injuries, inflicted by my former dentists, - I will not be able to wear any dental prosthesis, so, what shell I do, when I'll lose all teeth - not being able to eat?!

He said nothing.


28 Jul. 2022, Thursday

On July, 2022, I sent a next message to Dr. Rohan:


To: Dr. Ivan Rohan, ivan.rohan@mcgill.ca

Dear Dr. Rohan!


On July, 22, 2022, I received the next letter:

____

Subject: Deregistration from a family doctor's patient list

July 22, 2022 - Updating your file

Dear Sir,

You asked us to terminate your registration with Dr. IVAN ROHAN.

We hereby confirm that your file has was been updated and that your

registration cancelled on July 21, 2022.

For further information, please do not hesitate to call us at the phone

numbers appearing at the bottom of this letter.

Yours truly,

Marie Simard

Head, Centre de relations clientèle -

Québec

Telephone - Québec: 418 646-4636, Montréal: 514 864-3411

____

I never asked to terminate my registration with you, Doctor.

On July, 19, 2022, I called 1-800-561-9749, and demanded to place me on waiting list for a new family doctor, since January, 2022, because, I said, you, Dr. Rohan, retire at the end of December, 2022.

Thus, I never asked to terminate my registration in June - December, 2022 (i.e. before January, 2023).

So, this is not a product of a regular mess in RAMQ offices and ignorance of bureaucrats, but a deliberate act of medical terrorism, because:

1) I spoke with a male telephone operator, not with Madame Simard;

2) I communicated in French, while this letter is written in English;

3) I did not ask to unregister me with you, Doctor, yet; etc.

----


Now my access to appointments with you, Dr. Rohan, is blocked.

I am sorry for asking your help now, before your approaching retirement. However, my health problems are urgent, and medical sabotage of the government is forcing me to rely only on help of few last ethical and compassionate doctors like you, Dr. Rohan.

Unfortunately, doctors with human approach - like you, Doctor - disappear, and top-class specialists - as you, Doctor, - are also disappear from the public health care. L. G.

My best wishes, 7 Aug. 2022, Montreal.


It is clear that it was really a governmental provocation, but Dr. Rohan ensured me that I will stay his patient - no matter what, and, if an appointment booking will be blocked through the official governmental web site, he will see me anyway.


29 Jul. 2022, Friday

Only today, on 29 Jul. 2022, I could access my full blood-urine test through the RAMQ web site.

Even on 22 and 23 of July its report was not complete, it's some parts were missing.

I passed the lab tests on 22 June 2022.

If they would display this report too late (after 1 month and 1 week), it would be seen as a more natural case. However, a not complete report on 22-23 June 2022 leaved a lot of questions.

The findings also leave lot of questions.


Here (below) I display the controversy:

_________________


Gunin, Lev


BIOCHIMIE GENERALE


PRÉLEVÉ 22/06/22 10:04

REÇU 22/06/22 12:56


Résultats Valeurs de Référence Unités Tech


Cholestérol 3,76 B 4,20-6,20 mmol/L KEF1


LDL-Chol. (low density lipoprotein Cholesterol)

(calcul) 2,37 B 2,40-4,10 mmol/L KEF1

. ACK3


HEMATOLOGIE GENERALE


Résultats Valeurs De Référence Unités Tech


HEMOGRAMME


G.B. globule blanc 7,7 4,0-11,0 10^9/L PRC2


G.R. globule rouge 4,80 presque B 4,50-5,90 10^12/L PRC2


HB hémoglobine 143 presque B 140-175 g/L PRC2


HT Hématocrite 0,424 presque B 0,420-0,500 PRC2


VGM Volume globulaire

moyen 88,2 presque B 80,0-100,0 fL PRC2


TGMH teneur globulaire

moyenne

en hémoglobine 29,8 presque B 27,0-33,0 pg PRC2


VPM 7,4 presque B 7,4-10,4 fL PRC2


Résultats Valeurs De Référence Unités Tech


DIFFERENTIELLE


Automatisée ACK3


Neutrophiles 0,72 presque H 0,45-0,75 PRC2


Lymphocytes 0,21 B 0,25-0,45 PRC2


URINE - EXAMEN


PRÉLEVÉ 22/06/22 10:04

REÇU 22/06/22 12:53


EXAMEN PHYSICO-CHIMIQUE


Volume(mL) 12 ACK3

Aspect Limpide I/AUT

Couleur Jaune I/AUT

Densité (réfractomètre) 1,011 I/AUT

pH 7,0 7,5 I/AUT

Estérase leucocytaire NEG I/AUT

Nitrites NEG I/AUT

Protéines NEG I/AUT

Glucose NEG I/AUT

Corps cétoniques NEG I/AUT

Urobilinogène NEG I/AUT

Bilirubine NEG I/AUT

Sang (peroxydase) NEG I/AUT


________________


Low cholesterol (2 types!), low lymphocytes, and a number of borderline (almost abnormal) counts is an alarming signal, especially the low cholesterol.

When I asked Dr. Rohan about abnormal indicators, he mentioned nothing.

Why? For preventing a hypochondria in his patient?

Then, he could react to dangerous counts by administrating another lab test, or by referring me to a specialist.

A law cholesterol is always considered as a sign of an aggravation of the vascular problems (or even worse: like a sign of a risk of a heart attack, or a stroke), cancer; or as an indication that some major malaise had to happen in future few days.


AUGUST, 2022


7 Aug. 2022 - Sunday

In the evening (around 21:20) - I experienced a monstrous malaise attack, with atrocious stomach pain on the border of a pain shock, profuse sweat, kidney pain, and terrible pain in left and right areas behind breasts, near the armpit area and bit lower.

My voice almost disappeared, like when voice strings are damaged.


All started with little pain in the intestines, then strong pain in the upper stomach, moving down to intestines, and, after that, a striking pain in the chest flanks (as described above), accompanied by a stubbing pain all over the stomach and in the hepatic and splenic phlexure (i.e. on the left and right sides of intestines).

This all was accompanied by a sensation on the verge of dying.

The pain was on the border of pain shock and pain syncope. Kidneys pain followed, and, upon a light pressure on both kidneys - the area was painful and sensible. It means that even a small mechanical impact on kidneys provoked strong pain.

I decided not to call the ambulance, and to die better in terrible torments at home, not in inhuman conditions of a waiting room, the more so that ambulances (as I heard on radio, from people, and from Internet news) - at the present time - may not arrive in several hours and even days. There horrific stories of patients - left inside ambulances alone, - who died without any medical assistance. It is more likely that at the Emergency Room I would rather die, because toilets could be occupied by other patients in an overcrowded waiting rooms, and, certainly, I would not have an access to water, bath, and home remedies.


In the toilet, I used an anacanthartic method, provoking vomiting, and, at once, I felt a small relief. Unfortunately, I could not instigate a vast vomiting, which would clear the stomach and would prevent from a bigger damage to stomach-intestine mucus and other tissues.

Then I poured hot water into the bath - and lay dawn inside. Almost immediately the kidneys pain decreased, and, at least, a possible damage to kidneys was diminished.

All above described indicates some sort of poisoning, together with possible natural causes, and microwave radiation.

If not probable gastroenterological pathologies (most likely, a stomach virus), the malaise attack could be less severe.


This also happened while the last blood test shown low cholesterol (2 types!), low lymphocytes, and abnormal reading of some elements of the blood formula, or borderline counts.


Since the attack of malaise, no diarrhea; normal stool.

However, the stomach has swelled as if was blown up by an invisible hose, probably, because there is practically no release of the gases.


Running forward: I suspect an impact of poisoning (if it was poisoning) on the duodenum and the pancreas.


All symptoms precisely corresponded to 3 unknown malaise attacks like an exposure to "military" microwave radiation, but without an extreme vertigo. The first similar episode of the same acute malaise attack has evolved precisely on my birthday (!), November 3, 2005; next similar incident happened on January 7, 2013 (Orthodox Christmas! exactly at midday (at 12.00); and then - on June 21, 2016 (Hitler"s Germany attacked USSR on that date...


It cannot be accidental that I was poisoned or infected exactly on the day of the dramatic events in Ukraine (on 24 Feb. 2022), and fell sick with a very serious suspicious unknown viral or bacterial infection.


It cannot be accidental that I got a fracture in result of a suspicious incident in 2014, when a military coup occurred in the most problematic geopolitical area of the world.


It cannot be accidental that I got serious injuries due to a setup, which provoked my fall from the iron stairs, on 9-10 mar 2020: a link to the International Women's Day (and, simultaneously, a satanic holyday), and the beginning of dramatic Covid events in Canada.


It cannot be accidental that I got a urological infection, which was "promised" in 2000 by Immigration officials and Immigration doctor and destroyed my whole life, exactly on the 1-st day of the year, and the 1-st day of the new millennium - 1 January 2001.


I omit several other - similar - incidents, which correspond to strikingly symbolic dates, and, now, will concentrate on this latest episode on 7 August 2022, when I had a sickness attack, very similar to the incidents of November 3, 2005; January 7, 2013; and June 21, 2016 events.


Concerning these 4 episodes, my advisers (doctors, lawyers, scientists) believe that a kind of a weapon, which attacks its victims distantly by some sort rays (radiation), is tested on me in a row of same incidents for the goal of some experiments.


An additional rational adds the symbolism of dates (see above), which the attackers connect to their attacks. By the analysis of the dates' comparison, we can understand (more or less), WHO is hiding behind these attacks, what group of people. Especially, the late date (7 August 2022) is very significant, and it is very significant that it happened exactly on Sunday. The censorship, polit-correctness, and all this type of crap is so strong in our new era of dictatorships that I avoid speaking more precisely, but knowledgeable people will quickly understand the hint.


As we said in the former USSR: if a "coincident" occurs 1 time - it is a "compromised" event; if it occurs the second time - it is not a coincident; if it happens the 3-rd time: it is KGB.


It is possible that this number of life-threatening and not life-threatening (but, still, very damaging) injuries and suspicious sickness attacks would be enough for other persons to develop a terminal physical dysfunctionality (disability), or even die, and only my psychological and physical resistance, and the qualities of my body to regenerate and recover (maybe - because I am vegetarian) kept me alive.


An additional scary and sinister element: it is the blockage of the access to medical help after suspicious "hooligans' attacks", road accidents, staged accident, poisoning, etc.


When, after potential chemical poisoning or exposure to radiation, I was looking for medical help, I could not see a specialist, especially as my access to appointments with Dr. Poliquin was blocked by Verdun Hospital.


Here is my message to Verdun Hospital in August, 2022 (later I repeated it one more time):


To: Verdun Hospital; Centre des rendezvous; fax: 514-362-2953

From: Lev Gunin, tel. ..........


Whoever picks up this message, please, don't ignore it, don't take sin upon your soul.


I became patient of Dr. Poliquin in the end of 2017, even before Dr. Szego's retirement.


Both Dr. Szego and Dr. Poliquin were compassionate and decent persons, and high-class medical specialists, who treated my health problems with empathy and responsibility.


During my visit to Dr. Poliquin (16 Apr. 2018), he confirmed that 2 colonoscopies and 1 endoscopy reports have indeed disappeared from Royal Victoria's medical database (systematic vanishing of my medical tests posed a real challenge to all doctors from 2006 to 2022), and administrated 2 exams at Verdun Hospital, telling me that I'll be contacted in 1-2 months.


However, I received a call from the hospital only in 11 months (that was already very unusual by then). For a period of time, I had a remission, and such an intrusive exam became not an urgency. Besides, I had another medical appointment, issued few months earlier, and could not miss it. When I told the calling nurse that I have another appointment on the same date, at the same time, and asked to replace the date of the exam by another (later) date, she said that this is impossible, and that I have to start everything from the scratch: from an appointment with the Doctor, obtaining his requisition, and so on. It looked very strange and oppressive that a patient 1) was informed just 2 days in advance about such a serious exam as colonoscopy, and 2) was refused an opportunity to postpone this exam for a later date.


When (1 Apr. 2019) I had the next appointment with Dr. Poliquin, he expected to have colonoscopy- endoscopy in hand, but, unfortunately, there were no exams so far. So, Dr. Poliquin has administrated another request for colonoscopy-endoscopy at Verdun Hospital.


However, instead of an expected - in 2 months - contact, I received a call from Verdun Hospital only in May 2021, at the height of pandemic, and, besides, I was called just 1,5 days before the exam, and, besides, I was told that the colonoscopy-endoscopy will be performed simultaneously, at the same time.


Naturally, I had to cancel this appointment, as the nurse did not offer a possibility to postpone the rendezvous for a later date. Other reasons for this cancellation were: 2) to my knowledge, Verdun Hospital was infested by Covid-19 more than any other Montreal hospital; 3) I am not a young healthy horse to go through such barbaric colonoscopy-endoscopy joint exam at the same time.


So, when I had the next appointment with Dr. Poliquin on 29 June 2020, I still did not receive a call from Verdun Hospital, and had no opportunity to pass the exam.


When (14 Dec. 2001) I came to Verdun Hospital's Lab for tests, a Muslim female nurse in her 40-s aggressively attacked me verbally under a false pretext, and, then, all Hematology section was erased from the blood test report.


Next blood test (22 June 2022) found potentially dangerous pathologies in blood formula, and, not excluded, if the previous blood test would not partially have disappeared, it could be prevented by medications.


If I am not mistaken, my last appointment with Dr. Poliquin was in 2021, when he already worked ONLY in Verdun Hospital, or he left the clinic in LaSalle even earlier. It is possible that Dr. Poliquen is working exclusively at Verdun Hospital since 2020, and, thus, I am his Verdun Hospital's patient even formally!


Since September, 2021, I called Verdun Hospital 4 times, and was denied an access to Dr. Poliquin totally, under a pretext that Dr. Poliquin does not accepts new patients. However, I am not his "new patient", but, the opposite, I am his patient since late 2017. And, if my supposition is correct, my last 2 appointments with Dr. Poliquin took place when he already did not work at the clinic in LaSalle.


25 Aug 2021, my family doctor issued a 2-nd (since 2021) referral to Dr. Poliquin, but, when I contacted Verdun Hospital, I was denied an access to Dr. Poliquin again.


In spring-summer 2022, my daughter also called Verdun Hospital 2 times, trying to clear up, why an access to Dr. Poliquin was blocked for me. She received a fax number, and was told that must send a referral from my family doctor to this fax. I submitted the referral to the fax number fax: 514-362-2953 in June, 2022, but, since then, I received no news from Verdun Hospital.


On 7 Aug. 2022, I got a severe chemical burn of stomach and intestines, and Dr. Poliquin's help was essential, and still essential for prevention of severe complications.


Please, don't block me an access to Dr. Poliquin. Only such doctors - whom I trust - can keep me alive in such an unfavorable situation.


Aug. 10, 2022.

_________________________


8 Aug. 2022 - Monday:

Strong stomach-intestines pain the whole day, without any relief. Liver pain, too, or what feels like a liver pain.

The stomach is now - as before - swell as if blown up by an invisible hose. Practically, no release of the gases.

When - by mistake - I started eating minimally salt food: acute pain in stomach-intestines. (Another indication of a chemical burn).


Honey and eggs help (another indication of a chemical burn).


9 Aug. 2022 - Tue.


A small relief. However, the constipation is blocking the full cleaning of the stomach.


10 Aug. 2022 - Wed.

I began to provoke diarrhea, and this did even worse.

A wild diarrhea, till only water and mucus.

And wild pains again...


New terrible arthritis attack.


11 Aug. 2022 - Thursday

Some rapid improvement.

No stomach - intestine pain any more for some periods of time.


Now, I'll describe what happened on 7 Aug. 2022 - with additional details.


On poisoning - the most probable case - is nitric acid. It can be present in the products (vegetables, fruits) subjected to pesticides. As a residual quantity, the nitric acid may be found in apples, and in other food bought in stores or in the market.


However, something does not match this conclusion. First of all, we never eat fruits and vegetables, until washing very carefully under the running water. Then, we peel the apples from the skin, and the nitric acid may only be found in the skin.


Then, puzzles the LEVEL of the injuries of the stomach and intestines. The estimated level of the nitric acid, necessary for such a harm, must be considerably higher than a residual level of pesticides in any food.


Also, puzzled the sequence of the sickness development, in spite of its outwardly likeness to the version of a simple poisoning.


Pains - indeed - began in the stomach from above, but then became to be shifted down, for certain - accordingly to food's movement.


Then already the pain hit the whole abdomen - both the stomach, and intestines, - as though it was cut by knives without anesthesia.


And that - after artificially provoked vomiting - became slightly easier: and this, certainly, speaks about poisoning.


Unfortunately, the attempts to cause an extensive vomiting have failed - then it would protect the stomach and intestines from further damages.


Diarrhea would be helpful, too. (If could be provoked. But it did not happen.)


Then - approximately in 40 minutes - I began to do the gastric lavage, but it was already too late. (Not everyone is capable of it in home conditions).


What puts on guard: is a sharp kidney pain. Even an easy mechanical pressure caused a terrible pain.


I got into a hot bathtub - and the kidneys' pain started to ease, and then passed at all. It is one more signal of a more serious poison than a food poisoned by nitrates.


Then I drank something that protects mucous in the gastric path from the influence of a corrosive burn.


The problem is that I could not to carry out all these (and others) procedures at the same time, and could not do it at once: the terrible pain on the verge of pain shock threatened to send to a knock-down (in painful faint) - and then the end.


Sure - if someone else it appeared on my place: he would not survive.


On the 3-rd (and - now - on the 5-th day), the severe pain in the stomach and the

intestines - don't disappear. But to get to doctors - it is absolutely unreal: a number of the Emergency Departments in the province Quebec is closed; the unfortunate people are waiting in waiting rooms 48 hours and more (up to 3 days!), even not sitting in chairs, but sometimes laying on the "naked" floor.


The ambulances do not come. Couple of days ago all newspapers had a discussion about a message about one young man, who called the Ambulance 3 days in a row (!), but the car did not arrive, and the man died.


12 Aug. 2022, Friday

This time, the clinic separated the preparation exams (like IOP measuring) from doctor's assessment. Today (12-8-2022), I came for 8:15 appointment, just to see that Dr. Lesk will not examine me today, but on 18 Aug. 2022.


18 Aug. 2022, Thursday

With the appointment, scheduled for 9:40, I spent - in the eye clinic - around 6 hours, much less than usually: because the IOP measurement, and other procedures were performed on 12 Aug. 2022.

Dr. Lesk (the ophthalmologist) attempted, but could not fully hide his surprise when admitting a considerable improvement in my vision clarity and quality, in spite of still raging blepharitis.

I could see almost the smallest letters on the wall, appropriate for a normal healthy vision. IOP - 14 both eyes (at 12:17) - which is excellent. The visual field - is better. The optical nerve photo scan conclusion: stable.

This significant improvement has started almost 3 months ago, and (running forward) lasted till December 2022 (totally, 6 months), when, after being refused the Azarga drops in the pharmacy (due to a drastic shortage of medications in the whole Canada) in November, and after 1 months of using Cosopt instead, I started to notice a gradual worsening of my vision. However, there were no glaucoma attacks since April or May 2022; a stable IOP (14 or 15-16 in both eyes) was registered by Dr. Lesk (August 2022) and by an optometrist (November 2022). I feel no pressure in the eyes when doing physical efforts; or when put down the head. No eyes pain, no eye-related headaches, no vision doubling, no other (previously described vision disturbing symptoms) as far.

I can see now clearly more small elements in the distance than even in 2016, and I can read a book without the eyeglasses for 15-20 min., before the vision becomes blurry.

It is a clear evidence that my vision would gradually improve and would come to the norm (with an appropriate conservative treatment) in 2-3 years, and that the angles would gradually open without the laser iridothomy, which just destroyed my vision!

Thus, the real substantial (long!) improvement refutes Dr. Brais, Dr. Gans, and Dr. Lesk's claims that my vision degradation, glaucoma and cataract - is an aging-related problem. It also contests Dr. Lesk's and 3 other ophthalmologists' claims that my vision was (in some periods of time) gradually, or - sometimes - catastrophically degrading mostly due to the cataract (and, consequently, indirectly, because of the aging), and not because the iridothomy, hectically done by Dr. Gans, who provoked the optical nerve damage, the cataract, and very serious disphotopsia.

I'll not speculate about Dr. Gans's motives behind the urgently performed by him laser iridothomy, while he refused an adequate emergency conservative treatment of high IOP, but, certainly, his rash to employ the iridothomy had nothing to do with a medical necessity or advisability. He ignored my request for a full-scale conservative treatment at first, and also refused to perform an optical nerve scanning by the medical imaging technology.

This long-lasted self-improvement 5 year after the beginning of the drastic vision crises in 2017 (close angles syndrome; high IOP; etc.) is the proof that I never had an aging-related cataract, but acquired the cataract as a secondary effect (complication) from the iridothomy in 2017.

If I had an age-related (not traumatic) cataract: in this case the cataract would inevitable progress very quickly, and I would not be able to see already 3-4 years ago without a cataract surgery. It means that the iridothomy did more harm than good.


18 Aug. 2022, Thur.

A "telephone" appointment with Dr. Rohan (9.30) - cancelled.


20 Aug. 2022

My wife, and me, we visited our younger daughter (she lives 40 min. by bus from the last Metro station), and then, with her, we came to our older daughter (who lives 20 min. driving from our younger daughter).

When our younger daughter drove us from there back to her home, a black police car, Police Laval 74 (or 174), Ford SVH, met us at the key point, at the intersection of Levesque Ouest and my daughter's street (going east, i.e. crossing my daughter's street on Levesque O.). (Thus, it was obviously a sign of surveillance). Then, the police car turned right on my daughter's street, to the North, i.e. - in the opposite direction to our movement.

However, in 30-40 seconds, this police car made a 180-degree U-turn, and started following us. It could happen only if the police officers received a command on radio or from another communication device to follow us. This black police car Laval Police ...74 (or 174) then followed us to my daughter's home, and went to my daughter's backyard's stopping there and parking behind us, without giving any signs to stop.

A police woman - a young (harmonious posture; beautiful blond) woman - approached, and asked Marta about her owner's right for the car. Marta - pregnant with her second child - was very stressed, and this was not a good event for a pregnant woman.


22 Aug. 2022

I discussed with Dr. Rohan:

1. Chemical poisonning.

2. Skin lesions problems.

3. Blood tests' abnormalities.


Here (below) are the tests' results:


Gunin, Lev

PRÉLEVÉ 22/06/22 10:04

BIOCHIMIE GENERALE


Résultats Valeurs De Référence Unités Tech


Cholestérol 3,76 B 4,20-6,20 mmol/L KEF1

LDL-Chol. (low density lipoprotein Cholesterol)

(calcul) 2,37 B 2,40-4,10 mmol/L KEF1

. ACK3

HEMATOLOGIE GENERALE


Résultats Valeurs De Référence Unités Tech


HEMOGRAMME


G.R. globule rouge 4,80 presque B 4,50-5,90 10^12/L PRC2


HB hémoglobine 143 presque B 140-175 g/L PRC2


HT Hématocrite 0,424 presque B 0,420-0,500 PRC2


VGM Volume globulaire

moyen 88,2 presque B 80,0-100,0 fL PRC2


TGMH teneur globulaire

moyenne

en hémoglobine 29,8 presque B 27,0-33,0 pg PRC2


VPM 7,4 presque B 7,4-10,4 fL PRC2


Résultats Valeurs De Référence Unités Tech


DIFFERENTIELLE

Automatisée ACK3


Neutrophiles 0,72 presque H 0,45-0,75 PRC2


Lymphocytes 0,21 B 0,25-0,45 PRC2


URINE - EXAMEN


PRÉLEVÉ 22/06/22 10:04

REÇU 22/06/22 12:53


EXAMEN PHYSICO-CHIMIQUE

I/AUT

pH 7,0 7,5


Manquer (ABSENT) -- PSA Antigene specifique de la prostate PSA


Thus, the most important index (PSA) in missing: which is just another example of systematically disappeared data from my lab tests.


SEPTEMBER 2022


29 Sep. 2022

The growing problem of the lesion on the lower back is annoying and disappointing me.

This lesion is now inflamed, with the red skin around it since September 11, 2022.


A heavy presence of police on my back has intensified.

For example, on my way to my oldest daughter and from her: a regular police car 9-18 (Dodge, FLK5569) "met" me on my way to Metro (almost near the Metro); then I noticed a Montreal police car at the moment of my exit from a distant Metro station (around noon); then a black-white police car with big black number "2" was placed between the lanes in a key point (16:10); then our movement was intercepted by a rare type of a black police car with the white side paint, inside which there is an orange logo followed by the word Police in green letters, and nothing else (16:56).

And this is far not the heaviest present of police on my way on the same day.


OCTOBER, 2022


3 Oct. 2022, Monday

I already wrote how (in 2020-2021) Dr. Demyttenaere improperly managed the lesion on my lower back, and how, already suggested by then (for example, in my message to Dr. Rohan) that, if this lesion will not be removed, it will "disseminate" the surrounding tissue by a group of similar lesions. (Later, I found a confirmation of my suggestion in the academic medical literature).

Dr. Demyttenaere even did not come to any conclusion concerning the diagnosis: while refusing a surgical removal of this lesion, he did not distinguish between cyst, lipoma, or tumor. (I suggested - from the very beginning - that it might be a tumor).


In September 2022, I started to feel under the skin a group of similar (but located much deeper) "bumps"; so, Dr. Demyttenaere's mismanaging of my problem already provoked preventable - and - now - regrettable - consequences.


Besides, an inflammation and infection started to present itself in and around this lesion since the beginning of September.


So, my daughter has booked me an appointment at 12:00 (3 Oct. 2022), at a walk-in clinic "En route" in the Complex des Jardins (4-th floor, which it occupies together with Varad et Kinatex).


The female doctor (white, wearing eye-glasses, 36-38 y.o., lean, bit skinny; my height, or a little bit lower) blatantly denied the most essential diagnostic procedures (I demanded ultrasound, or CT-scan, an infiltrate test, and biopsy, or, at least, just an ultrasound) for clearing up an alarming emergency situation with the cyst between the neck and the shoulder.

She only repeated over and over again - as a robot: "you must address to your family doctor".

She responded to my argument - that I came now to her, not to my family doctor, and that now she is responsible for my well-being, - with the same "robotic" phrase.


When I accessed my file at ramq.gouv.qc.ca, to see that doctor's name, there was no record about my visit to the Clinique "En rout", which means that no prescription, no requisition - any medical procedure - was expected at this clinic by definition, and my appointment was void a fortiori.

It means that the doctor was informed by the government in advance, and obliged to act as if my appointment with her never took place, and, so, no prescriptions or requisitions could be issued pro tanto.


7 Oct. 2022, Friday

A man (31 y.o.) killed in his car by bullet, at night, outside of my younger daughter's home. One wheel of her recently purchased car was punctured by one of the bullets.

At night, police knocked in every apartment, and went in, searching, and she was so scared that her pregnancy could be terminated in a disastrous way.

Later, I recalled what happened in February 12, 2022:

On 12 Feb. 2022, we (my wife, and me) went to our daughter (to Laval).

2 black persons (looking suspiciously) have sneaked into her backyard, and popped around, looking for someone. One of them, a high lean guy, climbed up first and second backyard's stairs. The second black guy (a lower one) waited for him in the alley to the backyard.

Then, they got into the car (old 4 or 5 sits dark Honda Que... [I deliberately omit the car's license plate number, because I know about the aggressive racial profiling in the province of Quebec, and don't want to become a source of troubles for innocent people (these young persons from the car may be completely innocent, but, in case of any denouncement, the police might put them under an unjustified pressure]), and stayed in the car for about 15-20 min. outside of the house (on the same side).

From there, they drove to the park near the river, and stayed there for another 40 min. before leaving.

There were 5 black persons in the car, or even 6.

It can have some links to the homicide. But, according to all signs, police don't care. It is a major shift in the police department presently, and the police is not interested to investigate the crimes. Montreal and Laval never had such a level of homicides, but almost no such crime is solved by police. Almost no killer is presently got cached.

My daughter and her husband: they received no compensation for the destroyed car's wheel, nor from the government, nor from the insurance company. This is how the injustice is now sneaked in all possible corners of people's life.


13 Oct. 2022, Thursday

At 11:15, I got a call from Dr. Rohan.

Cyst's ultrasound requisition issued.


26 Oct. 2022, Wednesday

The whole day we (my wife, and me) spent with our children and grandchildren, and visited the botanic garden in a suburb.

When I came home, I noticed that forgot to take with me the external hard drive, which I normally never leave at home.

It was obvious that someone (during our absence at home) has connected it to a device (to a computer, for example) and searched.

All my "tags" were touched, too.

It means that an illegal secret search was executed while we were absent.


NOVEMBER, 2022


6 Nov. 2022, Sunday

Before the arrival of A., a high black young lean guy came from the Metro, and started to frame me. When we began to walk, this guy openly followed us, listening to our conversation. He touched me and pushed me 2 times - before the Charlevoir bridge over the canal. He wanted to cross the canal with us, but, when I demonstrated that we will change our rout if he doesn't live us alone, he turned right, and went away along St.-Patrique.

When I walked further with A., I found an "anti-covid" mask in my pocket, which I did not place there.

Normally, I never put used masks into a jacket pocket.

However, on 26 Oct. 2022, I removed the mask in the street (going home from Metro), and put the hand with the mask into the pocket, but was holding the mask with the hand all the time, until entering my apartment, and, coming home, immediately hang it on the locker's door's handle, and washed my hands.

Thus, NO MASK should be in the pocket.

When walking with A., I was pushed by a bicyclist, who did not strike me, but touched me, and - instantly - stopped, and, taking out his phone, started a conversation.

This contradiction in his behavior and actions show that, if he was in such a hurry that could not wait 1-2 seconds - until we (me and A.) - move from the passage, and dangerously squeezed between me - and the rails, he would not stop right away with the phone. He could start the phone conversation even without passing me - just behind us. His actions were most likely as if he executed his assignment mission (like touching me and spraying some - for example - aerosol), and then called his chefs saying that he successfully infected me, because, coming home, I suddenly felt pain in the throat, and running nose.

Also, some (another) black guy tried to follow us and to hear what we talking about.


9 Nov. 2022

The virus-flu aggravated.

Meanwhile, the pharmacy did not give me the monthly renewal of Azarga drops.

My wife, and me - we spoke to 3 pharmacy's employers, and they told us that the pharmacy has no Azarga at the moment, and that they will receive it only in 1.5 weeks.

My explanation that I critically depend from this eye-drops; that, even WITH ALL the eye-drops, I am suffering from frequent glaucoma attacks; and that WITHOUT the eye-drops I risk to lose completely my vision - did not change their attitude.

I take my monthly renewal of medications always at the same date, so, it is even more astonishing that the pharmacy did not prepare Azarga at the fixed date.

They could, at least, to warn me in advance, to give me time for actions.

I know about a critical shortage of medications in Canada, but even in this situation responsible people have to act differently.

The fact that this incident with Azarga coincides with the infection is an indirect evidence that I was deliberately infected, and also that a new round of persecutions by the government started again.


6-11 Nov. 2022

Together with the flu, there is pain - probably, vizeculitis or funiculate.

The flue passed approximately on Nov. 14, 2022.


16 Nov. 2022

VM-Med (9:30) - Ultrasound - R. neck-shoulder.


21 Nov. 2022

VM-Med (9:30)

Ultrasound - R. lower neck; they did only the neck-shoulder, the neck ultrasound was cancelled by VM.

A very good specialist, Dr. Browman, ruled out lipoma, and also doubted the cyst diagnosis, as there is no infiltrate inside the 5mm subcutaneous lump. The ultrasound also confirmed 2 or 3 other recently appeared cysts, situated more laterally.

Dr. Browman also confirmed that one or more cysts were infected recently.

Thus, my claims about the infected cyst and my prognosis - were completely correct and accurate, and Dr. Demyttenaere's role in causing preventable complications is absolutely clear.


30 Nov. 2022

The appointment with Dr. Robin Viviott (the dermatologist) was scheduled at 14:00.

However, 28 Nov. 2022, I received a phone call, and a female voice told me that the appointment is at 15:00.

Simultaneously, I also received a Microsoft Excel file with a time-table for the appointment, and it displayed the same time: 15:00.

Being puzzled, I called Dr. Viviott's office, but my call did not get through.

At first, I planned to appear at 14:00 (in case of...). However, at 13:45, somebody knocked at my door, but looking into the door peephole I saw no one. Of course, I was disturbed by this incident, and delayed my exit from home. Another reason for this delay was the fear of all kind of provocations, which the officials fabricate against me in medical institutions, so, to stay shorter time in a clinic or lab is a good prevention.

When I came to the NDG clinic at Glen, the secretary behaved as if she knew in advance about the delay of my appearance, and was instructed to answer and act in a very particular way. She categorically denied me an access to the doctor, and said that Dr. Viviott has already finished her working day, and left home.

However, I started to insist that I did not confused the time, and, while, when I was booking the appointment, I was given a schedule for 14:00, later somebody called with a message of the time change, and - also - I received an email with a different time: 15:00. Thus, I demanded, I want to know, who contacted me with a wrong time, and who sent me a false time.


Now, other patients have started to pay attention to our conversation, and the secretary obviously became panicking, or, at least, such was my personal impression. She suddenly said that - maybe - Dr. Viviott is still here, and went to check it and to ask if the doctor can still accept me. And, again, it might be my personal impression, but it looked for me that the secretary did it more because she was afraid of something, than because of altruism and compassion, or conscience (while this last motivation is also not excluded).


See below the screen capture image of the false appointment time table, sent to me in an official letter from Dr. Viviott's clinic:


In spite of the end of the working day, and in spite of the fact that she had a small baby at home (I knew this from the secretaries), Dr. Viviott compassionately offered her time, and removed a wide lesion, formed from a big nevus, transformed into something else.

For the lower neck lesion, she, naturally, said that this is not her domain.

If all the doctors were like Dr. Viviott, 90 per cent of ill people would become healthy and happy individuals.


After Dr. Viviott, I came to the secretary again, and told her that I demand an investigation: who misled me, calling me with a wrong time, and sending me a file with a wrong time.

However, the secretary reacted very aggressively, told me to live the place immediately, and refused to tell me the fax number, and to send a complaint. I can be wrong, but so could react a person, who was a part of the plot.

This was the 11-th time (during last year), when my medical appointments were sabotaged, or were subjected to an attempted sabotage.


DECEMBER 2022


28 Dec. 2022

Since November 7, 2022, I have a flue again: this time, only painful throat, and - sometimes - a running nose, and no other symptoms. At the present time, this light flu (virus?) still did not pass.

Running forward: I was sick till 4 Jan. 2023.


CHAPTER 6. January-February 2023.


2023


JANUARY, 2023


6 Jan. 2023

SERIOUS FURUNCLE - left arm.


11 Jan 2023, Wed.

The key from the postal box disappeared.

The municipal bureau has sabotaged a new key the whole month.

Finally, my wife called them with an ultimatum, and the concierge came with the key, but was extremely angry and screamed on me.


13 Jan. 2023

Dr. Poliquen called me precisely at 9:30: he was always as punctual as Dr. Rohan.

Trying to find out at what time was really scheduled the appointment, I did not ask Dr. Poliquin about it, but thanked him for calling so punctually, and he responded that, as the appointment by phone was at 9:30, this is his direct duty to contact the patient in time, if the circumstances allow it.

So I discovered that the appointment was at 9:30 indeed, and that the secretary, who called me about the appointment, just mocked at me.


I must remind here that, answering this call from the Verdun Hospital, I received only the date (13 Jan. 2022), but not the time of the appointment. But when I asked about time, she told me that the appointment is "par telephone", and that I must wait for the call "tout la matin".


On my astonishment, she just repeated that there is no scheduled time, and that the doctor can call at any time during the whole morning hours.


This next plot can be put into the same category as an appointments sabotage.


18 Jan. 2023

Today, it was a sad day for me. Dr. Rohan contacted me by phone the last time (again: precisely at 9:30). He is retiring, and I don't have a family doctor anymore.

He fulfilled all my requests, and wished me all the best.

I wished him the same, and added that the new generation of doctors is very different, and, among them, the altruists occupy a smaller place than among the doctors of his generation.

He agreed with a sad and a bit lyrical intonation.

During all 20 years, he did for me more than any other doctor, and, I believe, saved me from several disabilities, and, maybe, even saved my life.

Only since 2020, I realized how difficult it was for him in the circumstances when the government is using inhuman repressions against his patient, including the persecutions in the medical institutions.

And several moments of the discrepancies in our relationship, and some of his actions and inaction - are seen in a completely different light because of this.


FEBRUARY 2023.


1 - 10 Feb. 2023

Since 13 Jan. 2023, I cannot book an appointment for the tests, issued by Dr. Poliquin.

It looks like I am persona non-grata in the laboratories and diagnostic officies.


13 Feb. 2023

Since Jan. 13, 2023 (again, the digit "13"), I have another flue.

A Covid-test is negative.


19 Feb. 2023

The whole week I am sick.

There is no real cough, but I feel like the respiratory tract is blocked, and I have difficulties breezing. I never had anything like this in my life.


No running nose, no painful throat.


20 Feb. 2023, Monday

No flue anymore. No bronchus-lungs obstruction.

Everything passed almost without a cough.

Everything passed in 4 hours: like, here is a light cough, I still have difficulty breezing, and - after 4 hours: no cough anymore, no breezing obstruction.


23 Feb. 2023

(Soviet Army Day, and

the 1-year anniversary

of the conflict in Ukraine)


Stomach-intestines strong pain. When drinking hot tea, and putting warm clothe to the stomach: there is a relief from pain.


Liver and kidneys pain is also present, and signaling about a poisoning, or about a serious infection.


After noon, I was sitting on the computer in the salon, preparing a browser for a particular web page, which url I typed in the browser window. However, I was too sleepy at that moment, and went to the bedroom, and fell asleep. When I returned to the salon, there was an endless line of slashed after the url, and, if I did not type it - then WHO? It is impossible that I leaned on the keyboard, because it placed far ahead and a bit above. A little lamp in the salon, served for the purpose of seeing the names of the books, was now turned on. But when I left for bedroom, it was not turn on!


What else was not like any other day?


I found an insect in the bathroom; this types of bugs never live indoor, especially at winter. How did it get to our apartment, on the first place?


(See below):


A plastic box with hummus is broken this time, and might be contaminated.


24 Feb. 2023, Friday


Very strong fever (shaking); temperature 37.9; headache; stronger stomach pain.


25 Feb. 2023, Saturday

Abdomen (stomach) pain; diarrhea; headache; very strong fever (shaking).

Blood pressure: 120 x 70; pulse: 90, while my normal pulse is 60.


I went to a doctor in Laval (my wife accompanied me).

In the Metro train, 2 people sat (at neighbor seats, located not perpendicularly, but parallel to the wagon's (car's) wall) right opposite to me, along the opposite window: a black man in his 30-s, and a women of indefinable age (from 20+ to 40+), who looked like a native American or an Asian. He was seating straight, as normally seats a passenger, and she was seating across the bench, with her back to the man.

They pretended not to be knowing each other, but my studying eye noted that the 2 are a particular pair of people, who have some relation to each other.

My suggestion has been confirmed, when they both followed me inside the Cartier Metro station, when my wife and me - we get off the Metro train.

At first, the black man sneaked behind my back, and purposely went step by step behind us, surely trying to spot - what we do and what we are taking off the pockets. Then the woman replaced him behind us, surely trying to overhear - what we are talking about. It means that she had to understand both Russian and German dialect (or just Russian): languages, which we use for communication in public places.

When I suddenly stopped (on purpose) - she almost "flew" on me, and was really confused and even afraid that I "cracked" who she is. She went ahead - and did all possible attempts to get lost in the crowd, and to become "invisible". However, I spotted her 3 times, before she sneaked into a small shop inside the huge bus station.

Her workmate threw the hood on his head, tried to change his gait, and to pretend that he is another person, but this did not serve him at all. At the same time, he was clearly afraid to lose us from his sight, and, in spite his desire to disappear, followed us several times inside and outside of the bus station, and hid or "vanished" shortly before our departure. The woman re-emerged 5 min. before our departure, and disappeared in the opposite door (which leads to other buses).

Near the clinic, we were watched by an Amazon bus.


Before going to the doctor, I wrote on a piece of paper:


1. Since Jan. 13: the whole family was sick. No running nose; no throat pain; but the respiratory tract was blocked, and I could not breeze normally. It was very frightening; never happened to me.

2. Since Jan. 20: no sickness anymore; it passed in 4 hours, during which the indisposition disappeared, and the bronchial tubes and lungs were completely cleaned, and I started to breeze normally. Almost no cough from 13 to 20 Jan.

3. Since 23 Feb. 2023: stomach - intestines str. pain; kidneys-liver pain; finger inflammation and pain. After drinking hot beverages, or putting warm clothe to the abdomen - the pain disappears.

4. 24 Feb. 2023: fever; headache; stronger stomach pain; temperature 37.9.

5. 25 Feb. 2023, in the morning: diarrhea; headache; blood pressure 120 x 70, pulse 90, while my normal pulse is 60.


Shortly before leaving home, I added the 6-th point: "I suggest blood-urine tests". I also took Dr. Poliquin's requisition for the laboratory tests with me.


The young doctor appeared to be a good specialist, because she asked right questions and did the right exams. She also was very respectful to my explanations and the description of the symptoms, and did not interrupt me. However, she did not check if my tongue became coated: probably, because she was afraid of Covid, and did not want me to remove the mask; she was wearing her own mask very carefully, which is surely an indication of her fear of Covid. (By the way, my tongue was normal, not covered by white fur).


Dr. A. (Anna?) Lesperance had run over the paper that I gave her, and had only 1 question: about the details of the rapid and unexpected recovery from an acute flue in just 4 hours. She ignored my plea for the laboratory tests.


I also gave her to see Dr. Poliquin's requisition, commenting my gesture by telling that - since the beginning of January - I am not able to book an appointment for the tests, and I am asking her help, taking in consideration an acute poisoning or infection, which I am presently endure.


However, she did not respond to my plea as well.


She also ignored (or just not quite catch: because our conversation was erratic due to my aggravated during the flue hearing problems) my warning that I may not afford any payable medication, and prescribed rather expensive pills for stomach burning (not what I needed, because I had only cramps and grips, but not heartburning or stomach burning).


Having now more profound knowledge about the System, and more experience, I can guess that this good doctor did not follow her duties fully (as she did not administrate the lab tests), probably, because of some twists of the System, rather than because she was already instructed about me. Having retrospectively re-evaluated some actions of such very good and very ethical doctors, like Dr. Rohan, or Dr. Viviott, I became aware of the fact that the System did not leave them other choices in that particular frame of circumstances. In most of the situations, I can read people, and my experience told me that Dr. Lesperance is a good person working in an inhuman and offensive health care system's environment.


26 Feb. 2023, Sunday

Hemorrhage in the left eye.

Still stomach pain.


27 Feb. 2023, Monday


Stomach pain.

Unusual heart beat (tachycardia).

An annoying rash above the feet on both legs, with big bright red flat papules.


28 Feb. - 4 Mar. (Saturday), 2023


The rash is expanding becoming more annoying. It is very itchy and burning like a burn.


On Mar. 3, 2023, I passed the lab tests (my older daughter managed to find a niche in a rarely visited place, and booked an appointment for me). However, the urine test was not done, because was not indicated in the requisition.


I tried to reach Dr. Poliquin since last Wednesday unsuccessfully, and got through ONLY Friday morning (March 3), but this was too late. In spite of the best human approach of his secretary, I could not change anything, because Dr. Poliquin was absent at that time.


In the lab in East Montreal, I was also touched by the human treatment and politeness of everyone, who registered, processed, and managed my requisition and ID, and, especially, by two women: a middle-age registrar, looking like an immigrant from India, and the nurse (white 58-60 y.o. woman of Quebec origin; maybe with the English background), who collected the blood sample. If all health workers were like them: it would be already the best therapy for the sick people.


MARCH-APRIL 2023

When my family doctor retired, an access to medical care was almost completely blocked for me in general. The government cynically used Covid pandemic for blocking an access not only for people like me, but for 15-20 percent of population as well, planning to get rid of conscious objectors and of so-called "social ballast". Using Covid pandemic as a pretext, the ruling elite introduced a policy of the pre-registered appointment for any laboratory test, which made possible to a) cut a considerable part of population from timely and necessary laboratory tests, and b) to redevelop methods of lab tests' sabotage so that now it is entirely government's affair: to release an objective true medical data, or to destroy any of genuine medical exam.


As the government established an online policy for any medical appointment, it is becoming harder and harder to book an appointment by a telephone call, and a number of opportunities to see just ANY doctor have shrink almost down to "0".


And because my access to medical (private and governmental) websites is constantly sabotaged, not only an appointment with a doctor, but also an appointment for a blood-urine test is becoming a hardship.


Most of the time an access to Canadian (and Quebec) medical web sites is blocked for me (for additional information see book 8 of this chronicle: "Police Intimidation and Digital Terror" [(3) Systemic sabotage of phone line, Internet-access, and email services; innumerous disconnections of Internet and phone. Blockage of medical, educational, and other web sites. [Internet-Emails Sabotage 1997-2021.]).


For weeks (and, sometimes, for 1-2 months) I am disconnected from the most essential Quebec-Canadian web resources, not been able to access my laboratory tests, to book a medical appointment, or to book an appointment for a blood-urine test. I am using the updated and adequate web browsers, and there should be no problems with browsing and accessing the web resources from the technical point of view. There no problems with my computer systems, or with anything else that would limit or restrict my access to medical web sites. My browsers' configuration is common, like browsers of other Internet-users. Thus, my difficulties could be explained exclusively by politically-motivated persecutions, especially that there are also some indirect indications of this. For example, when, in April 2023, I accessed the mapquest website, it displayed the view of my last request back in 2015: a part of Glen site environments' map. However, since after 2015, I have another computer, another modem, another Internet-provider, another IP-address, and so on. There are no any non-system (personal) files in my "net" computer; no anything that could expose my identity. There are no cookies or cash files, which would be left after accessing web pages with my personal data; no passwords: nothing that could betray my identity to web sites. Besides, I am sitting behind a rooter wall, and my "net" computer is connected to the rooter and the modem by a wired connection, which does not allow intruders to see wireless avatars of other Internet-users around me, and, consequently, to calculate my exact location, my exact address, and my exact identity. Until Rogers' intentions to buy Videotrone, web sites like webquest could not crack my identity; the caller-ID function was not disconnected from my phone line; my phone-Internet connection never suffered from frequent disconnections (as before 2016); and I had NO problems with my current Internet provider.


During 2016 - 3 November 2022 period, I had only once a problem with my present Internet-provider, and, after my report of the problem, they immediately intervened, and the problem was operationally solved in hours. NOW I and my daughter - we contacted my Internet-phone provider few times, reporting multiple problems (from disconnection of the caller-ID function, to frequent disconnection from educational and medical web resources), but they never called back.


I believe that my access to Quebec-Canadian web resources is blocked on both levels: on the level of the medical web sites, and on the level of the technical facilities, which stay higher than my Internet-provider. See below:


Not only my access is systematically blocked, but the data of my laboratory tests and other exams is systematically illegally delayed, blocked, or destroyed.


For example, in the beginning of January 2023, Dr. Poliquin administrated a blood and immune test, signing a corresponding requisition. However, only in March 2023 I managed to get an appointment for these tests.


Till mid-April, I either could not access my medical file online in general, or the data on ALL laboratory tests was blocked altogether: the icon for the lab tests was simply "missing"! Normally, there are must by 5 icons: Rendez-vous; Médicament; Imagerie médicale; Services médicaux; Prélèvement; but - till mid-April - the 5-th icon was just removed for me! (See below):


When, finally, I was allowed to access the Prélèvement link-index (the beginning of April 2023), these 2 tests on the same requisition (done in March 2023) were still unavailable. Only in mid-April the blood-test report appeared in my medical chart, but the immune test was always missing. The message was saying that the immune test must become accessible before the 13 of April 2023, but - in the end of April, - my access to this test was still blocked (see below):


Besides, the government's web site illegally compromised my personal email address, displaying it without my consent. I never entered my email address online into any of medical web pages.


When the governmental web site was blocking all my tests altogether by removing the icon-link of Prelevement (it appeared only on 12 Apr. 2023), I called to book a rendezvous with Dr. Poliquin (11 Apr. 2023). Verdun Hospital's attendant tried to help me, but, first, the telephone reception was unacceptably bad; another person's voice (a female voice) frequently interrupted our conversation; there was noise-clicking on the line; and for my already declined hearing it was an atrocity; and, thus, I could not communicate normally with the man, who answered my call. Secondly, he advised me to book an appointment with Dr. Poliquin, and to ask the doctor directly to make the immune test's copies available for me. However, this advice violated any logic, because it is a nonsense to advice someone, who is calling the right phone to book an appointment, to book an appointment! I told from the very beginning of the conversation that I need an appointment with Dr. Poliquin, and, in the end of our conversation (seconds before disconnecting), this person "advising" me to get an appointment!


I cannot explain that, and, consequently, I am not going to blame the person, who spoke with me, but one thing is abundantly clear: is that all (and any) medical appointments are presently blocked for me by the government. For example, before his retirement, Dr. Rohan told me that he is arranging my appointment with a surgeon (concerning a lesion on my neck), but 5 months later nobody contacted me (and, I am afraid: will never contact).

[10 minutes after writing about the inaccessibility of my appointment with the surgeon, I received a call from his office, and got an appointment on the next day. I don't believe in such "coincidences". In this chronicle, I presented dozens of similar examples, which suggest that not only my telephone conversations are tapped, but that everything that I am typing on the computer is registered and becomes known to those spies. There are few ways to know - what someone in typing on a computer, which never goes online: from spy-cameras' clandestine installation - to reading and decoding the electromagnetic oscillations in the electric circuit, or recording the keyboard noises and decoding them into a digital text.]

[Next day, 27 Apr. 2023, Thursday, I was seen by Dr. Carl Emond (in St.-Mary Hospital's Outpatients' Clinic at 37777 Jean Brillant).

Dr. Emond behaved hostile from the very moment he saw me. He started the conversation not from the nature of my health problem or problems, but from a question - what went wrong with Dr. Sebastian V. Demyttenaere: why I stopped visiting him, and came to see him, Dr. Emond, instead. In my opinion, it was a non-ethical attitude, and not an ethical beginning of conversation with patient.

I did not want to complain about Dr. V. Demyttenaere; especially, that he might be a good person; just I had a bad luck with him. So, I just said that I did not get along with Dr. Demyttenaere.

Then Dr. Emond said that he's assessment is just a "second opinion", and I understood it as his unwillingness to help me.

I showed him the lesion on my right shoulder (bordering neck), the cyst on my back, and a cyst or infiltrate on my forehead, which, after many years, started to accumulate again, and told the doctor that I want all 3 to be removed.

Dr. Emond denied me surgical help, saying only that the cyst on my shoulder is "too small".

He administrated a new ultrasound, which is "0", nothing.


In the same way, doctors just played for time before the lesion on my forehead calcified, disfiguring my face forever, and not only disfiguring my face, but also making my right eye smaller, and causing other complications as well.

I must stress that it is too early to form an opinion about Dr. Carl Emond. He can be a good doctor and good man. Some old men hide their compassion and their good intentions behind a surface harshness, or even hostility.

However, my visit to him left an unpleasant aftertaste.


Maybe, I don't understand or don't know something, but all doctors, whom I visited in the past concerning cysts and other lesions, at least, looked at them and touched them, but Dr. Emond even not stand up, and continued sitting. It was an impression that he squeamish about touching me for some reason: more likely, because of my socioeconomic status, or because he was really hostile, and planned to do nothing about my problems.


From the very beginning, I told him that I have an impair hearing, but he started to speak even more in low tones. When I repeated that I can not hear well, and asked to speak a bit louder, Dr. Emond responded with an irritation: "Can you speak English - at least!?". Even if I would not speak English adequately, it can be interpreted as an insult and a discriminative remark, but, taking into consideration that I speak English almost like my mother-tongue, such a remark is even stranger. But, I repeat, it is too early to form an opinion, and Dr. Emond might mean something completely different, having some other considerations on mind.


When I asked Dr. Emond - why he did not give me a requisition for ultrasound, he said: "You'll be called". However, my negative experience with doctors includes 2 episodes, when doctors said that they administrate exams (CT-scan; ultrasound), but later it cleared up that they administrated nothing, and just deceived me.


Thus, the future will show if Dr. Emond is a good doctor and a good man, or, on the opposite, he has just bad intentions.


On May 1, 2023, at 8:30, I received a phone call from St.-Mary Hospital's outpatients' clinic. The secretary asked me - if I want to reschedule an appointment with Dr. Emond, or just cancel it. I said that I don't understand - what she's talking about. Then she specified that they need to know it - because, allegedly, I did not show up at the appointment with Dr. Emond on 27 Apr. 2023. "It is written here that you were absent", - she told.


I was astonished, and stressed that I HAD an appointment with Dr. Carl Emond. She was - clearly - confused and surprised, and murmured: "I'll call you back".


It is obvious that it was just another, a new provocation against me. It is also obvious that Dr. Emond was not a participant in this provocation, because, otherwise, he would not give me a paper, which confirmed my appointment with him.


Now, I must remind - what happened with Dr. Demyttenaere.


6 Oct. 2021, Wednesday

Around 10:45 I was seen by the surgeon - Dr. Sebastian Demitteneran (or Sebastian V. Demyttenaere) [St.-Mary's Out Patients Clinic; 3777 Jean-Brilliant, room 14], to whom I was referred by Dr. Rohan.

Dr. Demyttenaere appeared to be a nice young man, very polite and sympathetic, and, it looked like there was a mutual sympathy between us.

Dr. Demyttenaere was willingly ready to remove the cyst (on the old scar) from my back, which caused so many problems for last 10 years, but I complained about another cyst (or a tumor), on my right lower neck - high shoulder, which I considered now more menacing.

He administrated an ultrasound, and told me to book an appointment as soon as the ultrasound report is ready.


2 Dec. 2021

Dr. Rohan had to see me at 10:00 in person in his office, instead of calling by phone, because he needed to see my dermatological problems (and cysts) himself; otherwise doctors-specialists did not want to deal with a new patient.

And because Dr. Demyttenaere did not expressed any opinion about the lesion on my shoulder, waiting for ultrasound's results, Dr. Rohan has assessed this problem as well, telling that it is not a lipoma, and not a tumor (as I suggested), but a cyst. The next ultrasound (late 2022) suggested a tumor, so, Dr. Rohan might be wrong. In Dr. Rohan's opinion, this lesion will disappear by itself. However, like Dr. Beatrice Wang, and 4 other doctors, who suggested the same about other lesions, and were mistaken, he was wrong, too.


15 Dec. 2021

Dr. Demiteneren [Sebastian V. Demyttenaere] (St.-Mary's Hospital's outpatient clinic's surgeon - room 14) was supposed to see me at 8:30, but another - a new - conflict has developed at the entrance of the medical pavilion at 3777 rue Jean-Brillant.

The security guard - a high black guy - demanded to replace my anti-Covid mask with provided by him hospital mask.


I said that I have no confidence in the hospital mask, and that my mask is brand-new, and I did not remove or lowered it before coming to the hospital.

However, this guard (a 32-34 y.o. man) did not want to listen.

Then I said that I'm going to replace the mask, which I am wearing, by another - new - mask from a brand-new (sealed!) pack in the original packing, which I have with me.

However, the guard was stone-stubborn, insisting on the formality no matter what.

No argument (that, for example, he is giving me a mask without the cover, which is not sterile anymore, while I want to pick up a mask from a new sterile pack) were accepted by him.

Finally, I said that I am leaving, and that all the consequences and the damage to my health caused by the blocked access to the doctor will be on this cruel and tyrannical practice of illogical twisted mask policy.

In that moment, one of the white nurses that stood near the second - internal - door, also serving as guards of the mask policy, has approached me, and told that - OK - I can enter the clinic, but I must, firstly, to change the mask that I am wearing to a new mask, which I have with me, and, secondly, to put the hospital mask on top of my own new mask.

I agreed to her conditions, and complied, being allowed to enter the clinic.

However, inside, after passing 2 secretaries and registering my visit, I was approached by a woman, who started to ask me weird questions, and behaved like a policeman. Then another woman in the white gown approached me with similar wild questions.

It is very likely that the 2 women were a team of the governmental servants (doctors or social workers, or etc.), whose function is to enforce the pathologization of decent and to crash any resistance to all neo-totalitarian tendencies.

When I, finally, entered the room number 14 (not really a room, not really an office, but a segregated by glass walls cube), Dr. Demiteneren [Sebastian V. Demyttenaere] was not alone, but with a young-looking woman in civil clothing, and in a Muslim shawl on her head. There was no identification card on her.

I asked Dr. Demiteneren [Sebastian V. Demyttenaere] if she is not a policewoman, a psychiatrist, or a social worker, explaining that - before seeing him, - I had a conflict with the guard, and, in such occasions, they use the practice of pathologization of any disagreement with governmental agents or the governmental policy.

The woman was very confused, but Dr. Demyttenaere has comforted her, stepping right to her and surprisingly frivolously supported her by rubbing her back (or by some other movement: I don't remember exactly), and declared that she is a trainee (an intern), and belongs to the same medical domain as he himself.

However, the young women became even more confused, and no sign confirmed that he was telling the truth. On the contrary, her reaction would provoke a suspicion in anyone that she is a good person, who is feeling the pangs of remorse because forced to do something that contradicts her code of ethics.

When I asked her (through Dr. Demyttenaere) - what she things about my problem, she became even more tangled, not able to say anything, and surely knowing nothing about my case.

Then I asked if she has an identification card or in ID, which proves that she's a surgeon, Dr. Demyttenaere did not let her to speak, and, again, rejected my insinuations as completely groundless. The young women, in her turn, has made an attempt to leave this small glass cube (called "room number 14"), but Dr. Demyttenaere comforted her again, did not let her to do anything, and - again - rejected my demands.

And, finally, I said that I am against the presence of other people in the room during the appointment with Dr. Demyttenaere, but he just ignored my declaration.

After the development of the above mentioned ethical conflict - I did not want to speak with Dr. Demyttenaere anymore. He violated the basic rights of a patient, first, by not asking patient's consent (allowance) for the presence of strangers (of extraneous persons) during the appointment; secondly, by not providing a clear identification of the person, who was present in the room; and, thirdly, when I disagreed with the presence of the intern (or whoever she was), he, still, ignored my declaration of non-consent.

I did not leave the "cube" right away just for seeing - what will happen then; and Dr. Demyttenaere did not assessed me, did not even asked me to remove my winter jacket; he only said that he finds the removal of the lesion on my lower right neck (higher shoulder) unnecessary, and that's all. When I asked him about the nature of the lesion - concretizing my question by asking if it is a cyst, a lipoma, or a tumor, - he could say nothing. I just asked him if he really saw the ultrasound's report, and he said affirmatively. However, I doubt it, if for no other reasons then for the ultrasound's report's date (by then, only a preliminary report was ready).

Dr. Demyttenaere's primary obligation was - at least - to diagnose the nature of the lesion by physically assessing it, but he did nothing.

If he was perplexed by my disagreement to have another person in the "room" - then he had 3 options: 1) to send the intern away; 2) to clear up her identity, by showing her ID card or a student card (if she was a student; because she looked a bit older than an overage student); or 3) to administrate another appointment. However, he did nothing.

Thus, Dr. Demyttenaere might be a good person and a good doctor, but he must be ready for any situation, and to defend the rights of a patient, but, unfortunately, he did the opposite...

And now, instead of friendly Dr. Demyttenaere, I was facing a hostile Dr. Emond, and the System don't open any solutions to my health problems again...

Concluding about my visit to Dr. Emond, I must stress that it was even worse than a refusal of the appointment with a doctor; or, putting it differently, a "double refusal".]


[A removal of the small cyst and infiltrate on my forehead had to be a very minor, very quick, and very inexpensive surgical procedure, but it was cruelly denied, and provoked major complications: calcification with the formation of a big cone-knob, which disfigured my face, and caused a number of other significant complications.

A removal of the small cyst on my back had to be a very minor, very quick, and very inexpensive surgical procedure, but it was cruelly denied, and provoked major complications: a life-threatening abscess, and - later - 2 more episodes of inflammation and abscesses; courses of antibiotics; extremely painful surgery; and 6 months of healing; 10 times bigger public health system's resources; lot of doctor's time; and so on.

If these moral freaks did not deny 2 very miniscule surgical procedures, I would not have my forehead disfigured, would not suffer from 2 major abscesses, and would not strained the public health care resources.

Now, the same repeats 12-th time in a row during last 20 years, and I am - again! - denied the removal of the cyst on my back, the tumor on my shoulder, and the accumulating (again) infiltrate on my forehead.

What a sadistic, torturous SYSTEM!]


Regarding a major deterioration of my vision (see: sabotage of music works), I called 2 times since 4 Apr. 2023 to the eye-clinic, demanding an urgent appointment with my ophthalmologist, but my appeals were completely ignored: no one contacted me. If I had a significantly high IOP, I could become already blind. This is how the medical "justice" is working in Quebec.


My appointments with a urologist, and with other doctors - are blocked altogether.


In my old age, and in my health situation - totally cutting an access to medical help is the same as an assassination attempt.


This is the sad reality that we all are facing, but people like me are in a worse situation than anybody else.

_______________________


Lev Gunin


THE PUNITIVE HEALTH CARE

[HEALTH CARE AS A REPRESSIVE TOOL]


BOOK 6


THE DENTAL ORDEAL. [1994 - 2023]


CONTENT


Chapter 1.

Chapter 2.

Chapter 3.

Chapter 4.

Chapter 5.

Chapter 6.


__________


* * *


The whole text of the chronological events and medical documents (under the name of "The Punitive Health Care - (Health Care as a Repressive Tool)" is available for examination only on the basis of the following contract between the author and the reader:


I (THE READER) GIVE MY CONSENT THAT, BY CLICKING CORRESPONDING LINKS AND ACCESSING THE TEXT OF "THE PUNITIVE HEALTH CARE", I AUTOMATICALLY AGREE TO THE FOLLOWING PRELIMINARY CONDITIONS [FOR READING]:


-- I am (at least) 18 years old.


1. I (the reader) is undertaking (commit myself) not to distribute the text of "The Punitive Health Care - (Health Care as a Repressive Tool)" - entirely, or in fragments; not to copy medical documents; and not to share the text and images without author' permission.


2. I (the reader) understand that the confidential information, which is contained in this text, cannot be used for any other [than the reading (extraneous; secondary)] purposes and needs, for any researches, essays, stories, etc.


3. I (the reader) commit myself not to sneer at open ticklish personal information (which sharing was induced by circumstances), not to savor any medical, physiological, or anatomic details, and not to use this text as a reason for mockery and persecution.


4. I (the reader) am warned by the author that, except for a number of obviously immoral (by definition) doctors' and medical staff's actions, other decisions and acts described in this "confession" are not subjected to hasty moral assessment because a) only experts can judge finally about their justification and fairness; b) explanations and vindications of other party are necessary. We also do not know to what degree the doctors were under an influence and direct power of police, Ministry of Immigration, and other enforcement agencies, political organizations, groups and persons - with their own ideological, economic, and propaganda interests, - and to what degree this influence impacted on their diagnostic conclusions and assessments of patient's state of health. Many of the documentary confirmed facts incontestably demonstrate that author's ideological stand (who's opposing to younger generation's transformation into zombie-biorobots with mobile phones on shoulders instead of heads; to electronic totalitarianism with its prison-like total video surveillance; and to the tyrannical political censorship) played nearly a major role in enraging the authorities and triggering the persecutions.


5. I (the reader) am warned that the author sees the main cause of the most dramatic (for him) events in the fact that the enforcement agencies and interested persons and groups managed to present him to the medical community as an individual incapable to evaluate his health condition objectively; as a health-consciousan (or hypochondriac); an extremist; a troublemaker; an individual obsessed with panic and alarm patterns; as a person, who is making unreal demands to the system of medical care - concerning his - allegedly - pseudo-maladies and exaggerated gravity of trivial indispositions. This smear campaign of defamation, scurrilous libel, and wicked calumny made impossible receiving an adequate medical care (and sometimes any medical help at all), and led to health undermining, numerous diseases, incidents, and unnecessary sufferings. Doctors also considered difficult to believe in continuous (not connected with each other) illnesses, with an interval of 4-7 days, sometimes rolling at the same time: as tsunami. They refused to believe in these sequences of illnesses' painful course, danger, and significance. This chronicle disproves such a prejudiced opinion, producing an incontestable evidence.


6. I (the reader) am informed that all negative remarks, characteristics, and facts' assessments belong only to the portrayal of criminal groups, extremists, and carriers of anti-humanistic, racist, and totalitarian ideology, but do not contain groundless generalizations and negative assessment of any country, ethnic group, or religion. The author is categorically against dismantling of any of the existing states, and against restrictions of the rights of religious congregations of any faith.


7. I (the reader) am informed that this edition partially presents the previous 2017 edition without any changes, and, thus, may not correspond to later view and opinions.


8. I (the English reader) am informed that some parts of the following English text of "The Punitive Health Care" - were translated from Polish, Russian, or French originals, and may contain primitive language, double interpretation, or puzzled meaning. Such confusing fragments should be compared with their originals in Polish and Russian languages (author's native languages) [2016-2017]; all controversial points must be resolved through such a comparison.


9. In the very last moment of this edition's make-up (April 2023), the author came across a description of so-called Havana-syndrome, and found same symptoms and complications, which he experienced when was attacked by an unknown remote weapon (3 Nov. 2005, 7 Jan. 2013, and 21 June 2016), and developed symptoms of post-microwave irradiation.


_________


CHAPTER 1


Unhealthy teeth play a pivotal role in provoking most of the chronic and systemic diseases in humans. 60-70 percent of the illnesses are rooted in untreated teeth, according to some authors of the academic literature.


For example, the research "Systemic Diseases Caused by Oral Infection" (Xiaojing Li, Kristin M. Kolltveit, Leif Tronstad, and Ingar Olsen; Department of Oral Biology and Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway), is listing SOME of the systemic diseases, linked to oral infections: Metastatic infection; Metastatic injury; Metastatic inflammation; Cardiovascular Disease; Coronary heart disease: atherosclerosis and myocardial infarction; Stroke; Infective Endocarditis; Pneumonia; Low Birth Weight; Diabetes Mellitus; etc.


Canada has one of the most expensive dental services in the world, burdensome not only for the middle class representatives, but even for some rich people, and, in case of some particular procedures, even for very rich people.


However, Canada (and, especially, Quebec) has no dental coverage by state medicare and social programs, and those, who cannot afford dental care, must remove all their teeth, or live with permanent teeth infections.


After 2009, both Quebec and Ontario were aggressively introducing the USA-type [with the Israeli connections, especially in the ophthalmology, dental, surgical, and some other domains] for-profit health care system.


From my conversations with people, from my personal experience, and from the study of information available in newspapers, TV and radio channels, I came to a conclusion that the access to dental care is cut off from 60-70 percent of Quebec population. This vicious inhuman policy doesn't reflect an austerity (of the state resources), doesn't serves national interests: it serves only a very small clique of medical and non-medical gangsters, who's profiting from the national tragedy.


The government's policy, which reflects such savage aggressive profit-making on top of mass atrocities of the vulnerable population, is antinational, and matches a hidden motto of modern sinister repressive class: "not to heal, but to kill".


Inhuman advocates of this savage domination of the moral freaks will say that, at least, the teeth removal is available in most of the cases, and for almost all citizens, even if low-income patients are forced to extract semi-healthy and healthy teeth, but my case refutes such an allegation. Indeed, trying to get rid of all additional sources of infection, I resorted to an utmost step: to remove all teeth, together with the healthy teeth, and to have dental prostheses. However, the discrimination of unprivileged patients, and some other inequality factors instigated an even bigger problem: my jaw was damaged, the alveolar bones - broken, cosmetic defect provoked, my diction and even hearing affected, and no dentures fit into my mouth because of the dentists-inflicted traumas, and I'll not be able to chew the food in case if I lose the rest of my teeth.


The maxillary trauma has affected my hearing: it declined since then even more. There is also a direct link between 2 of the teeth extraction - and my vision's sudden and dramatic worsening.


Since 2016, chronic dental infection triggered oral lesions. Since 2022, oral lesions became a major threat (even a potential life-threatening issue), but there no money to treat this problem. To prevent such an outcome, I started to pull out all the teeth, including healthy ones, but the dentists fractured my jaw and a number of alveolar bones, which made dentures non-compatible with the consequences of these traumas - i.e. not a solution. No compensation... I was denied a Legal Aid lawyer. Further teeth extractions were stopped due to the risk of new fractures and anemia, which, possibly, developed in connection to the dental ordeal. My digestive tract was, certainly, also affected by the Canadian inhuman dental policy. Federal and Quebec Ministers of Health responded by cruel, cynical letters. Untreated oral lesion is a death threat.


It must be also taken into consideration that the dental surgeries "for beggars" have subjected me to such level of tortures (because of the damage to jaw and small bones, infections, and other severe complications, and - then - because of dentists' refusal to render further help connected to these complications) - that I tried to avoid any new teeth removal for any cost.


I was literary forced to delay teeth extraction as long as possible, regardless of the cumulative effect to body's inflammation processes, triggering UTI's, arthritis, dermatological, cardiovascular problems, and oral cavity's tumors, and, subsequently, an oral lesion appeared.


Post-surgical oral traumas as an obstacle for the prosthetics are mentioned in "Post-Operative Complication" (Naida Hadziabdic, Sanja Komsic, Halid Sulejmanagic; Department of Oral Surgery Faculty of Dental Medicine, University of Sarajevo Bosnia and Herzegovina); "Management of Maxillary Alveolar Process Fractures" (Shukhrat Boymuradov, Tashkent Medical Academy; Uzbekistan; in Medical and Health Science Journal, MHSJ; Volume 6, 2011, pp. 105-107 ? 2011 Prague Development Center); "Fracture of the Maxillary Tuberosity: A Case Report" (Biljana Evrosimovska, Boris Velickovski, Zaklina Menceva; "St. Cyril and Methody University"); "Maxillary Tuberosity Fracture Associated with First Molar Extraction: A Case Report" (Hidayet B. Polat, DDS, PhD, a; Sinan Ay, DDS, PhD, b; and M. Isa Kara, DDS, c); and so on.


I had very good teeth, and, if I could afford the dental treatment, I could have all my teeth till the 75 years old age, or 80, if I'll last so long.


However, the sadistic approach towards the majority of population (and me included), which deprived people of the access to the appropriate dental care, not only destroyed 6 of my teeth (2022), but also provoked linked to the permanent dental infection chronic and systemic illnesses, which present from 70 to 90 percent of my sores!


And now I have bumps and lumps on the higher palate, and, if this is something malignant, I am doomed, because the oral malignant tumors are ones of the most aggressive. The guilt for any undesirable outcome lays on Canadian dental policy and on greedy, blood-sucking dentists, or (in other cases) on their employers, who literally murdering a huge number of people, just people don't know that the Evil, which provoke their strokes, heart attacks, malignant tumors, etc.: are oral infections, linked to non-affordable dental services.


CHAPTER 2


1994-2015

First dental problems were also fruits of our low socioeconomic status and not proper food and sanitary inspection in Canada, because a piece of a tooth broke off due to some metal fragment in food.


Since our arrival to Montreal, we became patients of Dr. Jeffrey Tenzer, who had his own small dental clinic on Cote-des-Neige.


In general, Dr. Tenzer had an altruistic, human approach, trying his best to save his patients' teeth and maintain their healthy dental environment.


He offered relatively affordable services, and, considering our miserable socioeconomic situation, made frequent discounts.


He was an art's lover, and he liked my music; so, it is possible, this also played a role.


By then - in 1990-s - 2006 - a private medical insurance at work was a norm. When today's rulers are "grieving" that there is lack of personnel, and the employers cannot fine workers, they are cheating, because they know perfectly that today's overage salaries not only scanty and inadequate for paying a rent, but also that the benefits at work have extinct, and, first of all, there is no medical insurance at work in most of the cases. In 1990-s - 2000-s the public health care was also incomparably better than now (or, to be precise: today the public health care is actually destroyed).


When my wife had a medical insurance at work for all family members, we were able to treat caries in time, and, consequently, did not need root canal treatment, and the dental treatment was relatively accessible to us.


However, when the hotel was closed, and my wife took another job, she had no benefits, and we had no private insurance. I worked without benefits, or on temporarily works, and also had no medical insurance at work. Later (since 2004 or 2005), unknown people prevented my employment at all, forcing any potential employer to reject my candidature. I interpret it as a ban on work in Canada.


So, in 2004, it already became not realistic for us to treat our dental problems. Even with a partial coverage through the public health system, some procedures demanded excessive payments, and became absolutely unavailable. Dr. Tenzer was still offering big discounts, and, in addition, treated some teeth without filling (but just cleaning) the root canal, and (running forward) NONE of such teeth provoked inflammation or infection. Dr. Tenzer was a virtuoso for cleaning caries and putting filling into the cavities. His plomb inlays are surviving 20-25-years period easily. He did it, certainly, due to his compassionate approach and philanthropy, but it posed a great risk for him, if his blood-thirsty colleagues and medical authorities would find out. That was one of the factors, which forced me to stop my visits to this dentist: because I did not want to put him on risk. [I cannot tell about all patients (because I heard different opinions), but Dr. Tenzer did many good things to me and to 3 other patients, whom I used to know.]


All problems were solvable, except of the root canals; and, having already 3 root canals problems in 2004, which demanded serious treatment and filling, I was left without any solution even with Dr. Tenzer's special approach.


The same dilemma was facing my wife as well.


So, we tried with several other dentists (including Dr. Petrova), who promised to provide an affordable treatment, but they just wasted time, meanwhile extorting some sums of money for particular procedures, and, in the end, demanded even bigger amounts of money for root canals' treatment.


Finally, we came back to Dr. Tenzer, who could not offer anything else on top of his already generous discounts and favors. He even told that could treat 1 root canal for free, but I had to pay for 2 other root canals. Knowing about his business' temporarily difficulties, I did not want to use his sacrifices, and, besides, I would feel my duty to treat 2 other root canals and pay for this treatment, but I am not a magician - and cannot make money from air.


However, without telling me the truth during the procedure, he just treated the canal, presenting later with a fait accompli. Feeling bad about using his work for free, and considering my duty to treat 2 more root canals at his office - but having no money for this, I just stopped visiting him since then...


That's why my last visit to Dr. Tenzer was in September 2005, and, then, I had no dentist at all, and, for 10 years (till 2015), did not treat my decayed teeth. During this 10-years break, 6 or 7 of my teeth became so bad that 1 or 2 needed an extraction, and 5 or 6 needed root canal treatment.


CHAPTER 3


August-September 2015.

Next time - after 2005 (after 10 years) - I came to Dr. Tenzer for removal of several teeth. It happened 12 Aug. 2015 (at 10:00).


Next appointments with Dr. Tenzer were on 19 Aug. 2015 (at 11:00), and on 25 Aug. 2015 (at 13.30).


Then I visited Dr. Tenzer on 3 Sept. 2015 (at 15.00).


He removed upper 3 or 4 teeth (I lost my notes, and my memory failed me), which could be treated and saved (one with the help of a crown) if the treatment of the root canal was covered by RAMQ card.


22 Jun. 2016

On June 22, 2016, - despite the awful health situation and with all the complications of yesterday's attack - I had to visit my permanent dentist who treated me around 20 years (Dr. Jeffrey H. Tenzer).


At 16:00, he has accepted me at his office - 5885 Cote-des-Neiges, Suite 509, Montreal, Quebec H3S 2T2. Tel.: (514) 737-9367. I have told to doctor Tenzer that I suspect a cyst on the top gum, on the right side.


He has attentively examined the area - to which I have pointed, and has told that, possibly, I am right. Answering my question - how and when it is possible to remove this cyst, - and - together with it - 2 molars, which treatment could not go ahead with my social and economic status, doctor Tenzer has replied that he will send me to a specialized clinic, because it is unsafe to perform such an operation in his office.


Here a small retreat is needed.


Thanks to sympathy of doctor Tenzer for me, and his special attitude, I could keep all my teeth up to age 65 definitely. However, dental services are an excessively expensive privilege in Canada, especially for the needy people, such, as I am. If - in 2015 - dental treatment without root canal was still covered by a universal state program, the treatment of the root canal became even more expensive, reaching the fantastic amounts (this procedure in Canada costs few thousand dollars), and not covered by RAMQ as before. And who has no money for it - must pull out almost healthy teeth.


Once Dr. Tenzer has filled up a canal, without having taken a cent. He also treated other teeth, bypassing the canal though it represented a considerable risk of troubles (for him). But these 2 or 3 cases did not rescue other teeth, which has resulted in a need of their removal.


Unfortunately, I could not go at once to that specialized clinic, because just for the next day (or, probably, day after tomorrow) my urologist has reported that the operation on removal of the bladder stones will, probably, take place on June 30, 2016. He has not been confident yet, and has reported that will call me back at the beginning of the next week.


Somewhere on June 27 or 28, 2016, he has really called back, and has reported that it is still not known precisely, whether he can perform the surgical operation on June 30, 2016, and has told that it will not be known precisely till 6:30 in the mornings on the same day - June 30, 2016.


This uncertainty and ambiguity has introduced additional drudgeries and inconveniences since I could starve less time, I could sleep better (to wake up later), worrying less, etc.


It happened because the authorities sabotaged the surgery, putting me in life-threatening situation, and would finally kill me - if not a heroic action of my urologist, Dr. El-Hakim.


If I have correctly understood, and have mixed nothing: my urologist, without having waited for surgery's date from hospital's administration, and having estimated a situation of further postponement of operation as critical, has made an arrangement with someone from the mediocre ranking medical officers, and with medics of the surgical office, and has simply come on June 30, 2016 - in operational room's free time, - without close coordination with hospital's top management and without preliminary date setting: and has performed operation.


Thus, he has committed a courageous and risky act, and has literally rescued me, because - if not him, the date of operation would be postponed vaguely forever until I "would play a box"...


Such a scenario of events is most likely would develop without strong-willed and power intervention of my urologist...


I omit the description of the operation (record of the surgery is already given in the Urological Drama chronicle), and will concentrate on the Dental Ordeal.


Since May 2016, my hearing has continued to decline, and I link it (among a number of other factors) with the dental infections.


But Dr. Sejean sabotaged the appropriate diagnostics and treatment, and literary just mocked at me.


Some light to my problems could shed the scan of the thyroid gland, and it is worth to describe the events around this particular scan. My family doctor has administrated a thyroid gland scan in 2011. At first, this scan was appointed to September 2, 2011. However, soon it was rescheduled to November 21, 2011.


When the result was ready, my family doctor has told that everything is "in norm", but, since the end of November 2011, he did not want to provide a copy of this ultrasound's report on no account.


He did not refuse it, but used to "swing" the conversation, transferring it to other subjects, or promised to give me a copy "next time". It is unknown: whether he was trying to covered up the disappearance of this test. Theoretically, this scan has shown some other problems, and, in particular, some problems with vocal chords, and it was Dr. Sejean, who, using all his influence, has blocked an access to this result.


A similar ultrasound scan of the thyroid gland has disappeared in November 2008. It is amazing that another - former - scan from 2008 was also first scheduled for September 2, and then rescheduled for November 3 (my birthday!), and then again rescheduled for November 21 (!). My family doctor behaved by then similarly, telling that he will give me a copy "next time", and later it turned out that the scan report has disappeared.


In December 2008, I have addressed in the hospital archive, having filled the corresponding form, with a request for a copy (ultrasonography from November 21, 2008). This copy was never issued to me: I never got it; and when - in 2009 - I personally visited the archive (to find out what has befallen to this result), they have answered that "cannot find it in the database".


Meanwhile, judging by the blood analyses, not everything was safely with the hormonal function of the thyroid gland (see in other sections (books and parts) of this huge chronicle: blood test, April 23, 2008).


Having seen the results of the laboratory analysis from September 2, 2008, I have noticed to my family doctor that, in my case, the elevated (abnormal) indicator of TSH - for certain testifies for a reaction to an infection (the development of antibodies), which - theoretically - could attack and injure, or temporarily "disorient" the thyroid gland.


In practice, I considered a possibility of such a scenario as very questionable, but - theoretically - a possibility of weakening or failure of the thyroid's function because of an attack of antibodies: is quite real.


The doctor has answered nothing to my remarks.


I omit the appointment with Dr. Sejean on February 5, 2016.


But there is one very significant fact: when - in a year - I have received "all" official reports of Dr. Sejean from the medical archive (and the documents connected with my visits to him in the office of OPD in St. Mary's hospital), it has appeared that ALL records are absent, except of one, the very last: for July 7, 2017.


Where the others have got to? Have been withdrawn? Destroyed? Or, may be, simply an access to them was blocked for me? Or doctor Sejean wrote down nothing about other rendezvous, in defiance of all norms, protocols, and laws?


Anyway, the absence of the records means that Dr. Sejean and hospital have what to hide.


For my part, I can provide proofs concerning each rendezvous, confirming that totally I visited Dr. Sejean 4 times, NOT one - as someone wants to pretend.


(Besides, the date "February 5, 2016" - as the date of my visit to Dr. Sejean - is mentioned in the official report of the audiologist).


At the end of November - the beginning of December, 2016, I endured one of the most painful and tragic periods in my life. A "vague" (since it could not solve my problems by definition) operation on bladder stones removal (first, given a number of complications, and, secondly, initially not solving all problems, which have resulted from the unethical and prejudice attitude of the urologist, Dr. Morris, and other doctors and medical institutions); wait for the next (following) surgical operation, and stay in an uncertainty concerning its date and probable results or consequences; the whole drama of inappropriate and extremely painful dental surgery operations and its tremendous complications); a deep depression provoked by the actions of doctor Morris, and crimes, committed against my health in several Emergency Department of Montreal hospitals; further deterioration of my vision and development of complications of the trauma caused by inexplicable cases on November 3, 2005; January 7, 2013, and on June 21, 2016, and their consequences, including the vitreous body detachment and sight and hearing deterioration; new (after November 3, 2005) sharp deterioration of hearing, provoked by events on January 7, 2013, and 3 incidents with an inexplicable vertigo, and brutal, cruel treatment at Emergency departments; almost complete loss of voice accompanied by episodes, when - for the unknown reason - nose was bunged up; and an avalanche of other health problems: all this not only rendered demoralizing, depressing impacts on my life, but also interfered with my normal functioning and communication with people, undermining the very bases of my human existence.


It was a monumental human tragedy developing against the sadistic attitude to my health problems by medical institutions and public services, continuation of police persecution, and the cruel provocations, which brutality amplified my depression in tenth times, and deuterated the general state of health.


Crimes against citizens in medical institutions have their mirror "shadow" as an astonishing grows of the criminal activity.


At the beginning of 2000, I foretold that the police-state regime and electronic tyranny, and total citizens' shadowing by means of a large network of surveillance cameras, huge databases, and illegal collection of confidential information - will lead to corruption of society's bases, and to rapid growth of violent crimes. There passed 10-15 years since my predictions, and they completely came true: the crimes level promptly grows not only in Toronto and in the southern provinces of Canada, but also in Vancouver, Ottawa, and in Quebec, the safest province of the country, and in its largest city - Montreal.


This monstrous Orwellian system, which was mounted under the pretext of "security" - rendered and renders an absolutely opposite effect, and - in my forecasts - I told why. Besides, such a system of Oppression always starts to be a thing in itself, getting out of hand beyond control, and acting by its own laws.


In a broader sense, the term "crimes" includes also a shocking indifference of ranking officers (doctors, engineers, financial, political and business top executives) to peoples' needs, to their life and health. In all countries, which regenerated into the proto-tyrannies, trains and buses began to collide much more often; bridges collapse, burying hundreds of human bodies; buildings, restaurants, and hotels burn or collapse; natural disasters bring much more collapses and troubles, because of the disorder and criminal negligence of the rulers; and other similar catastrophes occur more and more frequent: because a huge granary lock is hung up on mouths of all critics of abnormal projects and corrupted officials, who sign potentially dangerous engineering projects, solutions, and developments, or initiate political resolutions, which bring the disastrous consequences. Without the criticism at all levels and in all social groups ("allowed" not only for the ruling elite's representatives and for hereditary powerful dynasties' hairs, and not only for state radio's hosts) - bridges and planes will fall more often, and innocent citizens will perish from gangster douchebags' bullets, or will have to face trains "out of the blue"... And the malignant regeneration of the functions of the medical sphere and police workers, and their complete impunity - reflects the process of transformation of the former democratic states into repressive regimes of the proto-fascist dictatorships.


All 3 todays' main ideological movements in all countries - neoliberals, neoconservatives and neo-populists - try to assure today of anything, and the general public (especially the youth) do not understand that democracy is not a presence of a ballot box and ballots with names of 2 or several batches. It is not true. It is not the democratic, but the majority principle, comparable to a situation, when 2 conflicting gangs of bandits decided to make peace - and divided a territory among themselves controlling some given region. Without the personal data protection; free press; free speech; freedom of expression; without civil liberties and human rights; without independent court; without division of executive and legislature; without the guaranteed rights of political opposition, which is not restricted to one or two opposition parties of "official opposition"; without presumption of innocence; without observance of the constitutional laws and rights; without equality of citizens and rule of law; and without other main structural, systemic, legal and political principles - the whole "democracy" comes down to a ballot box as a relic of a former democracy - which does not exist anymore.


And here, when there is only a ballot box left from the former democracy: first, not that batch wins that will collect more votes; and, secondly, a gang, which more dexterously will raise more money and support from pseudo-ethnic, mafia, and oligarchic circles - will turn fraudulent tricks with votes, with personal databases, and will perform manipulations by means of social networks.


And, secondly, this majority and oligarchic pseudo-democracy very quickly and inevitably becomes a fascist regime.


The demolition of true democracies changes the behavior code and the way of thinking, with the projection to all spheres of life, including the medical sphere, and patients like me, who don't comply with such changes due to lack of education; low social status; or pattern of thoughts: are mistreated by doctors-lackeys and doctors-loyalists.


Consequently, my urological drama was partially a product of direct political persecutions and extrajudicial punishment, and partially - reflected the above-explained pattern.


It not only inflicted tremendous suffering and health decline in general, and produced a number of complications, but also interrupted the treatment of my other sores - like untreated dental problems, postponing possible solutions.


9 July 2016.

On July 9, 2016 - I finished the next course of Cipro (antibiotic).


12 July 2016.

The next chapter of my health's ruining: was an infection in the mouth (which could develop after 7 courses of ciprofloxacin and 2 other antibiotics suppressing the normal flora, which opens the door to other (aggressive, malicious microorganisms).


This infection, as I believe, provoked an abscess, and, concerning the abscess (July 12, 2016, at 9:00) I addressed to the dentist, Dr. Tenzer.


On the same day - on July 12, 2016 - he prescribed Clindamycin: to treat the abscess on the upper right gum and to prepare the removal of 2 teeth.


After 4 tablets of Clindamycin I had a very serious diarrhea with terrible gripes in the intestines, colorectal inflammation - very serious, with ulcerations and threat of sepsis, and with terrible gripes and colic in the intestines.


I endured nearly fatal colitis.


It is unknown for what reason (this time) Dr. Tenzer, who was usually prescribing Erythromycin (which always worked for me effectively and never caused any side effects, such as, in particular, diarrhea), appointed Clindamycin.


Diarrhea lasted 2 weeks (and acute diarrhea - 8 days), against the background of an absolute indifference of doctors (for such an advert reaction to antibiotics I had to be - at least - hospitalized).


During all these terrible events, my weight so sharply and rapidly minimized that I was on the verge of dystrophy.


Diarrhea kept 8 days, and it is told in the instruction to Clindamycin - that, in case of diarrhea, it is advised to address urgently to an Emergency Room.


It was a new disaster, because I could not sit, and was not able to sit out many hours in an emergency department.


Dr. Tenzer appointed the removal of 2 teeth (at my request) to Tuesday, July 19, 2016.


Meanwhile, on the same day, July 12, 2016, I addressed to the walk-in clinic La Cite (not in the most visited by me Metro-clinic, where it is necessary to hatch out for 4-6 hours), but my request for medical help concerning acute diarrhea was ignored.


Nearly the most terrible occurrence: it is that all these dramatic events and related to them sufferings followed one another, without any break, and that, in turn, deepened the depression.


Diarrhea on the verge of catastrophic outcome lasted 8 days, and only somewhere on July 20, 2016 - declined.


13 July 2016, Wednesday.

On July 13, 2016, I met with my family doctor (9:30).


I asked to him to prescribe something concerning diarrhea, and also to replace Clindamycin by another antibiotic, but achieved nothing.


14 July 2016, Thursday.

On July 14, 2016, I addressed again to Dr. Tenzer, because the extensive abscess on the right upper gum did not respond to treatment yet, but I also suspected that the chronic infection provoked the formation of a cyst in the same place, which - already as a secondary complication - was infected, having formed a bigger abscess.


Considering the complexity of a clinical picture, Dr. Tenzer decided not to remove an estimated cyst and 2 teeth at his office, but sent me to a specialized tooth surgical clinic of Dr. Solomon (Benjamin) Saleh, where I went for the 1-st time on the same day, on July 14, 2016.


In the referral, it was specified that Dr. Tenzer directs me to Dr. Solomon Saleh, who is the chief doctor of this clinic (and, perhaps, the owner), and the most experienced doctor among all other dentists, who worked there.


Running forward: I somehow got out of diarrhea caused by Clindamycin (with a complication in the form of the external inflammation, etc.). But - on July 14 and 19 - it was not still clear whether I could ease this serious gastroenterological problem.


The clinic of Dr. Saleh was situated on Jean Talon St., near the end of Cote des Neige, at the border of the rich and very special municipality.


Until - having appeared in clinic - I showed the verso of the social benefit check-stub, everything went normally: they were going to register me for an urgent appointment with Dr. Saleh. But - as soon as they learned that I have no private insurance, and that, besides, I am on social benefit for 1 year, they bounced me to Dr. Dao, who was probably a young beginning specialist though my case was complicated and required a special attention and approach, and, besides, they perfectly knew that, as Dr. Tenzer sent me to Dr. Saleh - it means that it was necessary.


My next "purgatories" began exactly with it.


It is difficult to determine with confidence the age of Dr. Dao, because Asians often look much younger than Europeans of their age, but it was possible to conclude (considering by his behavior, by his shape, taking in consideration how Dr. Dao spoke, etc.) - that he was 20+ years old (or, at least, not older than 30). And my case demanded a very experienced surgeon...


I told this doctor-dentist that I suspect an infected cyst complicated by an infection, and I believe that it is necessary to extract 2 teeth, which are not subjected to treatment (if I have no money for dental treatment). I also asked to take a sample (of the cyst) for a biopsy.


Dr. Dao decided to pull out 2 teeth without having appointed any antibiotic in general - instead of Clindamycin, in a situation of an infection and huge infected abscess on the gum, having refused a swab test (concerning the infection), and not having performed additional examinations concerning the cyst (in particular, a CAD scan, which I requested and which could be done inside this clinic). Clearly, the risk of excessive suffering and medical security of a welfare recipient is not considered worth a pig heir.


While Dr. Dao refused the essential preoperative therapy and crucial tests, he appointed the X-ray of ALL TEETH - despite my disagreement (that, however, could be not a personal initiative of Dr. Dao; but, anyway, it represents a deeply immoral, unethical and harmful policy of many dental clinics in Canada). The reasons for imposing an X-ray of ALL teeth are multiple and various, from simple money extortion and coercion to do not just a single procedure in the clinic, to spying activity and commercialization of medically extorted information. Thus, doctors like Dr. Dao, who agreed to work in such clinics, wittingly agreeing to unethical acts.


One can be told for certain: that - concerning the refusal of the CAD scan, a test for biopsy, and a swab test - that is already carrying a signature of what has happened later.


I repeatedly asked Dr. Dao to replace Clindamycin with another antibiotic, underlining that I do not want to pull out 2 teeth until the healing of the abscess and cyst's removal, because, maybe, Dr. Tenzer is going to repair the teeth without filling the canal, or, maybe, my friends will collect money for a canal treatment. But he insisted on simultaneous cyst's excision and both teeth extraction, having told that it is better to remove them as soon as possible - despite inflammation and abscess, - because, otherwise, the situation may become even more dangerous. In the societies like Canada and other English-speaking countries, where it is permitted to kill and mutilate people for profit (or just because they don't have money - becoming a social burden), it is impossible to know if Dr. Dao said the truth, or he was just imposing a standard plan for poor underprivileged patients.


When I was brought on X-ray, and learned that they going to scan ALL TEETH, I was indignant, and said in French that the dental X-ray - is one of the most harmful and dangerous radiation procedures, that I already did recently several X-rays at Dr. Tenzer's clinic, that I had the vitreous body detachment in both eyes, and that, therefore, a dental X-ray constitutes for me a special danger in provoking cataract.


Then the female assistant, who was carrying out the X-ray exam, became angry and hostile, and said that, in that case, I have to look for another clinic, because the rules in THIS clinic are that and that, and "nobody will do an exception" for me.


Still suffering from a deep depression, which only periodically began to retreat after the litholopaxy surgery, I powerlessly conceded - though thoughts about a request to talk to Dr. Dao or Dr. Solomon Saleh rushed in my head.


After first exams and the X-ray of all teeth (July 14, 2016), Dr. Dao, having learned that Clindamycin provoked serious side-effects, did not dare to prescribe antibiotics at all, and ordered to come on July 22, 2016: for the procedure of 2 teeth extraction.


Now he told that there is no cyst. And, if there is no cyst, then the biopsy is not needed. Such a "logic" explains why Dr. Dao began to negate the cyst: because such a negation could save additional time for additional procedures and bring other benefits to the clinic and to Dr. Dao himself. It is also possible that Dr. Dao simply had no license for such procedures as cysts' incision, or had no confidence in his own knowledge and skills for this. Anyway, I might be wrong in my speculations about his motives, but Dr. Tenzer, an excellent, knowledgeable, and very experienced dentist, had no doubts about the diagnosis, being sure that there is a cyst. He even mentioned the diagnosis "cyst" in his note to Dr. Saleh. In turn, I - as well - had no doubts that the cyst is there.


When I asked - what about the infection, the doctor answered that, as a rule, after exodontia (with which it is connected) it passes by itself.


On my question - why, then, it is necessary to wait till July 22, but not to extract these teeth now, he gave no answer.


Despite all his decisions, which puzzled me, he succeed in extorting my consent for the extraction under these dubious circumstances.


The operation (as it was already told above), was appointed to July 22, 2016.


19 July 2016, Tuesday.

On July 19, 2016, at 10:00, I came to Dr. Tenzer's office again.


The abscess on the gum still did not give in to antibiotics and did not decrease, though did not increase any more.


I suspected that a chronic infection provoked the formation of the cyst in the same area, which - already as a secondary complication - was infected, having formed the bigger abscess, which did not shrink during last course of antibiotics.


All this occurred while I developed the next urological drama, and could not just visit regularly Dr. Tenzer, but could not even come to him even randomly at all.


I almost do not doubt that - if I had a regular treatment at Dr. Tenzer, then it would not happen, and, thus, this next drama was a consequence - again - of everything that happened because of the bias to my complaints and obstinacies of Dr. Morris, and also because of the brutal and cruel treatment of other doctors and hospitals.


When I repeated to Dr. Tenzer the assumption that I have probably an infected cyst on the upper gum, he made one more picture, and told that, perhaps, after all, there is no cyst. But he added that - for full confidence - it is possible to show me to one more expert, who specializes in cases of new oral growths: if I insist.


But I did not begin to abuse the good attitude of Dr. Tenzer, who - during all these years - already did me so many favors.


In 5 minutes, I realized that Dr. Tenzer began to refute his own diagnosis "cyst" right after Dr. Dao at Solomon Saleh's clinic began to rule it out, and, thus, he ruled it out just because it was dangerous for him to contest the conclusions of such a rich and influential clinic. I immediately started to regret my decision not to use an opportunity to visit a specialist, who specializes in this medical area. However, it was too late.


The doctor left this room, and then his assistant was engaged with me.


When I could already go home, Dr. Tenzer was busy with other patients, and I did not want to distract him or wait, and left home.


20 July 2016, Wednesday.

On July 20, 2016 I visited my family doctor (8:15), to whom I came concerning the chronic diarrhea.


He wrote out the requisition for the laboratory analysis concerning diarrhea, but - as I was convinced later, - this kind of analyses was doomed to the same as all other analyses. No bacterium could be identified by definition, because the system did not want to detect it - and was not going to identify it.


It is not just my conviction based on SYSTEMATIC manipulations with my analyses, losses and falsification of the laboratory reports, and other numerous manipulations, but (besides the whole corpus of evidence presented in this chronicle) - more concrete conclusions based on more concrete facts. Avoiding to be unfounded, I provide the following document (see below):


[see this lab report's image from 14 Sep. 2016, in the special series of this chronicle (The Urological Drama), which displays also a number of other lab tests, which disappeared]


The printout of the laboratory report from September 14, 2016, on the requisition of Dr. Szego, gastroenterologist. (See above)


If this is a "result" of a laboratory analysis, then, what can be called "no result"?! In this document, it is claimed that the analysis... does not exist... because, allegedly, "there is no sample"! But, if to argue logically, that - if I came to the laboratory and provided the sample, then where the sample got to?! Where is the sense?


It is not such a single "result" of this kind [the disappearance of lab tests became systemic and systematic] during the same period of time.


Exactly in a month, November 17, 2016, St. Mary's Hospital's laboratory has delivered another "result" of the same kind (an evident sabotage (see below).


In the printout of its result (microbiological culture), it is said that, allegedly, "there is no sample" i.e. that the test tube was actually empty - as it is possible to decipher the note "decomte bas, ID non fait". (See below)


The microbiology culture, from 16 Nov. 2016.


It is impossible to know (because it is not specified) the reason of the "low count": low microorganism's concentration, low volume of sample, or laboratory's error. However, because such kind of reports are exceptionally rare, and, judging by the systematic sabotage of my laboratory tests, this report is nothing else but another act of sabotage. Taking into consideration the fact that near half of my laboratory tests' reports are marked by such messages as "low count"; "confused with other patient's sample"; vitamin C incompatibility (while I don't take vitamin C or other products with vitamin C!); "no sample"; "patient refused to provide a sample"; "this part of test is missing"; and so on: it excludes any accidental "errors", but points to a deliberate sabotage on the level of laboratories, computer networks and digital databases, or manual sabotage by some "technical workers".


Concerning the sample volume, I, anxious with obtaining the right result on bacterial infection detection (microbiology culture), always strictly follow all instructions.


[Added in the end of 2017: In December, 2017, the number of lab tests, done outside of Montreal, has increased till 20, and none of them disappeared, or was incomplete, or had any remark like "no sample", or "low counts". Moreover, all 20 tests identified the infection (while NONE of dozens of Montreal tests identified the infection). The conclusion is inevitable: my laboratory tests are sabotaged only in the city of my residence: in Montreal. However, if I would pass the lab tests ONLY outside of Montreal, the authorities would, probably, expand the territorial range of their "anti-medical" operations.]


Secondly, a month ago, almost the same pretext was used for sabotaging another analysis (see the previous photocopy); so, two such "coincidences" in a row are not realistic.


Thirdly, for many years (since 2001), the same procedure was exposed to sabotage all the time: the test for microbiology (bacteriological culture) that originates from the conflict with the department of immigration and consulate of one foreign state, and goes back to my immigration saga, and to threats of immigration officials - in case of my refusal "to be treated" for (alleged (the diagnosis was falsified: see previous books) "tuberculosis" - "to award" me with a urological infection.


Fourthly, the laboratories of the public hospitals used ALL methods for sabotaging my laboratory analyses, EVERYTHING, except ONE, and, therefore, the next logical step inevitably had to include "low count" "excuse", which was still not employed until now.


It is necessary to add that I have no reasons not to trust three St. Mary Hospital's laboratory's doctors-chiefs, and their professionalism, which makes this laboratory one of the best in Canada.


Also, it is quite illogical and improbable that someone of them is involved in criminal manipulations with patients' analyses.


On the contrary, the most logical and probable version is that all tricks with the analyses (as a part of repressions against objectionable persons) are carried out by means of junior medical personnel and non-medical staff (including cleaners and technical workers, security services staff, system analysts, network managers, etc.), and also by means of electronic computer technologies, including the replacement of authentic data in the electronic database by false data, destruction of data, or substitution of the output data. Heads and technicians of medical electronic systems; chiefs of the offices of access to information, and other workers of this sphere: here through whom, logically - and on a number of facts, sabotage is carried out.


21 July 2016, Wednesday.

On July 21, 2016 - I delivered a sample for the test in the window of St.-Mary's Lab. (See above what has happened to this analysis).


22 July 2016, Friday - July 29, 2016, Friday.

On Friday, rather a serious operation on 2 teeth and a cyst removal took place (July 22, 2016).


But - at first - let's followed the events step by step.


First, as I was convinced in the course of further visits to this clinic, it was necessary to wait here long hours, not less than 2-3 hours, and sometimes even longer. It seemed to me that the patients, who looked more respectably (apparently from the high social group) were served quicker, but I am not absolutely confident about it.


The depression started to fade immediately after the litholopaxy operation, but, even with the increasing improvement, such a long waiting time rendered a demoralizing, devastating effect, enforced by depression. Besides, there was again the perineal dermatitis with ulcerations, and sitting in the waiting room for hours: became a real torture. This irritation and inflammation was, probably, triggered by stomach infection, which started again the recurrent diarrhea as well, and 2-4 hours of waiting (one or two times I had to wait up to 4 hours (!) in this clinic) - became already just intolerable. I told the secretaries about my problems and impossibility to wait so long, but I saw no compassion in their eyes and in their actions. They did not attempt to reduce for me the waiting time. The number of my visits to this clinic (4 times before the dental surgery on July 22) was also questionable: all preoperational procedures could be done in the same day.


Besides, after the urological operation (passed only 2 weeks ago), it was contraindicated for me to sit and even stand so long, but I could not stand too long because of the dorsal pain and the problem of blood vessels, so it was necessary to sit continuously, and it was even more dangerous.


Meanwhile, Dr. Dao and his assistants looked into my mouth, did an X-ray picture, and told that there is no cyst.


But I did not trust them and their conclusion, and, as it appeared later - not without justification.


I even contacted Dr. Tenzer by phone, asking his advice, and he said - with a trace of hesitation - that it is important to demand a letter from Dr. Dao - about the procedure and cyst's presence. I asked if this is important concerning the principle of medical necessity, and Dr. Tenzer did not say "not". His silence left me with a feeling that such a letter could play a role of a referral to hospital's free dental services, and I started to understand - why the dentists might have a motive to deny the cyst's presence: simply because they want to sabotage ANY free dental services for citizens, as this presents a threat to a part of their bloody profits!


Such logical conclusions have found some logical confirmation based on similarity right away. Dr. Dao and his assistants have touched the financial "nerve" right before the surgery.


Prior to the procedure of dental surgery, they "offered" to me "an option" to pay 200 dollars for a "harmless" (according to them) lulling anesthesia. It was not a "classic" general anesthesia, but a special "gas". The patient lulled to sleep by this gas - and feels nothing.


But I answered that I don't have such sums of money. The motive behind declining the "offer" was not only the financial reasoning (i.e. that, living on welfare since 2015, we (my wife and me) hardly made ends meet, and have no funds for additional expenses). Not less important was the fact that I wanted to be aware of what is going on and what is done to me, not to be an insensible doll in doctors' hands.


Then they did an extremely painful (Dr. Tenzer somehow manages to give such injections less painfully) injections in the gum. There was the infected abscess, and these pricks caused such pain that I nearly fainted.


I intended to ask to smear the gum by the Novocain solution before the injections, and - thereby - to anesthetize this area (considering the presence of the abscess) at least slightly. But because of the stressful situation and the fact that I was confused by the conversation about the payment for an "exclusive" anesthesia, I became puzzled - and forgot to state this request. But, really, did medics not understand and not realize what improbable pain will be caused by the injections directly into the abscess, and could not think of it?!


I had the watch before my eyes, on my wrist, and noticed that Dr. Dao returned to the office exactly in 5 minutes after the anesthesia injections. I was scared and shocked by the prospect of dental operation beginning prior to sufficient effect of anesthesia.


Having touched by the language the sore gum, I shuddered from pain. Anesthetic did not work fully yet.


Meanwhile, Dr. Dao was ready to start the operation, and, in response to my objections and complaints that anesthesia did not work yet, expressed doubts that I perceive the feelings adequately.


Then I pressed through the cheek on the gum, which swelled from abscess, and literally jumped up from the sharp pain, which slapped me as an electric shock.


Dr. Dao did not trust me, or pretended that he doesn't trust, having reacted as if I pretend to be paralyzed by pain. He knocked on those 2 teeth, which should be removed (because of the cyst and because I had no money for canal filling), but I could not feel an "additional" pain, because the furuncle ("gumboil") still so terribly tore after the pressing that - against the background of this pain - no other pain was felt any more. I, having passed from French to English, told Dr. Dao (literally): "I cannot feel an additional pain on the top of the pain already given by the abscess after I pressed on it" - but the doctor pretended that he somehow ignores my verbose explanation, whether considers it in general tongue-tied, whether just ignores my explanation.


Nevertheless, Dr. Dao conceded, and, having reported that he gives me extra time on the strengthening of the effects of anesthesia and that will return after a while, left the office (7 minutes after anesthesia injections).


There passed not less than 30 more minutes, and Dr. Dao did not come back, and I began to worry.


I needed to run in the toilet; the inflamed perineal area burned; the back and the head hurt; and everything muttered and raged in the stomach.


Nobody stayed in the office, except me. I had nobody to ask - what's going on and when the doctor returns.


Then I came out to the corridor, and began to look for those assistants who worked together with Dr. Dao.


Without seeing them, I moved off in searches for any of personnel, and came across an office where Dr. Dao did an operation to another patient at this time. This procedure (as far as I understood) was in full swing.


Having caught some medical worker on the corridor, I asked her to come into this office to ask Dr. Dao how long he expects to be occupied with another patient and whether I will manage to go - during this time - to the toilet. But she hesitated to come into the office, and nothing left to me as, having propped up a back a wall to wait near the office.


However, another female medical worker - passing by - said that I am not allowed to stand here, and banished me from there.


I went then to the toilet, returned back, but Dr. Dao was still busy by another patient.


I precisely recorded the time, and it appeared that - after Dr. Dao's exit from the office, when I insisted that the anesthesia does not work yet - there passed exactly 50 minutes: an hour without 3 minutes from the anesthesia injections.


Having returned back to "the" office, I waited for not less than 20-25 minutes more, having outright been frightened of the fact that the anesthesia will already not work anymore if the operation drags on. Several times asking the assistants coming by or looking into the office whether it happens so that - while I wait, the effect of anesthesia will weaken, and - closer to the end of the surgical procedure - will disappear in general, I worried more and more.


The answers to my questions - concerning the safe time for the beginning of operation after anesthesia injections - were the most contradictory.


When Dr. Dao began to pull out the 1-st tooth, there were only unpleasant sensations - pressure, etc., - but - gradually - I began to feel a considerable pain, which all the time amplified.


Dr. Dao and his 2 assistants had real difficulties to extract both teeth. They tried different technics and approaches, but nor the 1-st tooth, nor the 2-nd tooth could not be extracted in any way. They started to break them off and to remove the broken fragments; they have sawn and split up both teeth by special mechanical tools; I hope that they did not leave any splinters inside.


The whole dental operation lasted 40-50 minutes, and all this time I felt the intense pain, which sometimes punched like an electric shock, gradually amplifying, despite the anesthesia. Dr. Dao and his assistants understood very well that they are literally torturing their patient, because the surgery appeared to be too complicated and long lasted, and because the anesthesia did not work already.


Dr. Dao twice suggested to stop the operation, but I did not agree to finish it in a second attempt (in other day), but ordered them to continue.


Was it not too much suffering for one person to have 2 rounds of tortures?


At the final stage, Dr. Dao told that there is an extensive cyst (he denied it before the operation; NOW - he confirmed that there is a cyst: so, I was right) - and that now it is necessary to remove the cyst, too, and, for its incision, it is necessary to cut the gum very deeply, so the operation will go on.


They made havoc of the whole gum, and put innumerous stitches. And, long, insufferably long, they sewed it up. When they sewed it up, the pain continued to be intolerable. I already groaned and writhed from pain as though the "freezing" (anesthesia) completely or partially disappeared.


It was impossible to talk after such an operating, and I could not ask about biopsy. Later, it became clear that nobody sent to a lab neither biopsy, nor samples for microbiology. The biopsy and infection tests were completely ignored.


After the surgery, it became clear that the operated gum hangs down along the area with 2 extracted teeth, at the level of surrounding healthy teeth though there has to be a hole.


Really, did the torture not end, and one more surgery will be required (or, maybe, not just one?).


I will not describe the torments and suffering until the wounds began to heal just a little. There was something abnormal, because a long strip of skin, with surgical threads on its end, was hanging down of the middle of the gum instead of the extracted upper teeth, overhanging even below the lower teeth. Then (in 2 weeks) this strip came off.


I could not eat anything at all 4 or 5 days, and - at first - even to drink (the mouth did not open at all), and only for the 2-nd day could drink something like a light soup and juice.


The problem was also with the impossibility to drunk through a straw - as I knew about the danger of bleeding and infection (i.e. after exodontia, and other dental operations). The seams (threads) were not dissolving and did not disappear even 2 weeks later.


I kept small plastic bags with ice almost 24 hours a day, because the bleeding (sometimes, so intensive that I was thinking to call 9-11) continued non-stop.


At first, the pain started to ease just a bit already on the 3-4-th day.


However, since Friday, July 29, 2016, the terribly injured gum suddenly began to hurt again, and this pain constantly amplified. I suffered from unbearable pain for 5-6 weeks, before some small improvements became sensitive.


I am sure that Dr. Dao fractured, at least, one alveoli bone (teethridge) of the upper jaw. The detailed exams, symptoms, and self-tests are described in popular and academic medical literature, and there are almost no doubts that Dr. Dao did an irreversible damage to my jaw and gum. The level of horrific pain during 2 months, and other elements of long suffering is also telling about the same. And Dr. Dao's lie in his reference to Dr. Tenzer is telling the same.


The epic of this dental operation's complications lasted for months, and it is not surprising that the depression and panic attacks threatened again to finish me finally:

1) fear of a new UT infection, ischuria, retention, obstruction, or failure of the digestive function, etc. (i.e. functions, which are kind of guaranteed to us and of which we do not think, such as breath, etc., suddenly appear questionable, and it is really horrific);

2) impossibility to sit normally, and, so to be engaged in creativity that would occupy my mind, my thoughts and feelings, and would provide the mental stability;

3) sudden aging and degradation of appearance, and, in particular, a cheek hole, quickly forming after exodontia and gum surgery on June 22, 2016;

4) from 2-nd of June, and, then, since June 21 (the drama with Septra, with all side-effects and complications; then - the (3-rd) new vertigo+ episode (2005, 2013 and, now, 2016), with a visit to ER (suspicion of mini-stroke) and Dr. Rowen's harassment, followed by whistle in ears, deterioration of hearing, difficulty to distinguish the speech, which is not connected with hearing degradation, and other symptoms of a possible ischemic episode: all this made my social life even more problematic and all my existence - pathetic;

5) for nearly half a year of unceasing diseases, our family's material-financial resources are exhausted because the help to me and solutions of my problems fell on my relatives with a heavy burden; while I cannot earn a cent.


I will refrain myself from condemning all actions of Dr. Dao.


My case was rather difficult, and the main guilt of my sufferings and falling a victim of mistreatment lays on the clinic and on sadistic practices of the Canadian state, which allow to kill and torture people for profit or because they have no money to pay for dental medical help.


It is possible that - from the medical point of view - Dr. Dao did many things (but, of course, not everything) correctly, but some of them incorrectly. Especially, he should not agree (under no circumstances) to perform 2 complicated dental surgeries on 2 patients practically simultaneously in 2 different dental offices. Under medical, and under ethical point of view: it is a serious crime.


From the human point of view, the incident with anesthesia and the ambiguous "non-diagnostics" of the cyst (Dr. Dao recognized, finally, that I was right in my claim about the cyst only at the end of the dental operation, in spite of the fact that I began the very first visit to Dr. Dao with a conversation about the cyst), and a number of other dubious - from humanitarian and even ethical actions of Dr. Dao - are inexcusable.


Some of his actions can be written off for a certain rigid framework, in which, perhaps, the clinic put Dr. Dao (which is directed-managed not by him, but by Dr. Solomon (Benjamin) Saleh). But there were serious violations of medical ethics - whether because of the doctor, whether because of the clinic.


It is, first, the unnecessary X-ray of ALL teeth (moreover that my dentist, Dr. Tenzer, does not work in this clinic; and - moreover - that Dr. Tenzer already did all X-rays in HIS clinic just days before), which subjected me to excessive and harmful radiation (and it: despite the concern expressed by me and disagreement, and the statement for the fact that - few days ago - I had several dental X-rays in Dr. Tenzer's office).


Secondly, it is a refusal (whereas I was forced to pass UNNECESSARY X-ray of ALL teeth!) to administrate a special X-ray - CAD, - or an ultrasonic exam, which would allow to resolve the questionable diagnostic issue about the cyst.


Thirdly, this is the simultaneous treatment by Dr. Dao of two patients with difficult cases (it could be imposed on him by clinic; who knows) - almost at the same time.


And, fourthly, it is the reference written out by Dr. Dao, in which the doctor gave an obviously incorrect, inveracious information.


And, fifthly, it is Dr. Dao's refusal to provide the follow ups treatment, to continue a therapy or a surgical intervention regarding the post-operational complications, and his offensive (and unethical) order (to me) not to come to this clinic any more.


On August 5, 2016, when I saw Dr. Dao last time (he actually ordered me not to come to this clinic anymore), he told that he will write a letter to Dr. Tenzer, who sent me to this clinic.


I asked if I allowed to copy this letter, and Dr. Dao kindly agreed.


Then I stated one more request: I asked to mention about the cyst (in this document) and about the gum surgery, and that the stitches were put on the gum.


However, when the secretary issued to me this document in a closed envelope, and I opened the envelope and read the content of the letter, I found NO WORD neither about the dental surgery, nor about the incision of the section of the gum, nor about the cyst, nor that the gum was sewn up.


Next day (or on one of the following days: I don't remember, and I did not find my notes about it) I came to Dr. Saleh clinic again, and asked Dr. Dao (having faced him somewhere on the sidelines) to change the content of his letter and to give the accurate information in his reference, but he refused to change the content of the document.


This is the letter (see below):


Here is my translation from Canadian French:


To Dr. Tenzer from Dr. Dao.

I want to thank you for referring Lev to me. I examined your client on consultation, before exodontia. On July 22, 2016, we carried out a surgical procedure for exodontia number 15 and 16. The operation took place without complications, under a local anesthesia. If the additional reference is necessary, do not hesitate to address to me.

(Standard and polite farewell).


As we can see, not a single word was devoted in this reference to the surgery's details: how long did it lasted, and if that surgery included gum's incision.


Dr. Dao lied also that the operation ended without complications, because 3+-months-long healing of 2 extracted teeth accompanied by the VERY severe pain; a new infection (concerning this infection, Dr. Dao prescribed Azithromycin); and the serious defect of the gum (left by the operation) and of the cheek: these are still not all far-reaching complications.


The ordeal with the post-operative pain and complications lasted totally 9 months, and more than a year I was experiencing pain when eating.


One of the evidences of complications are Dr. Dao's own prescriptions (see below).


1) Novo-Profen, and other medications, prescribed by Dr. Dao on 16 Jul. 2016:


2) Azithromycin, prescribed by Dr. Dao on 3 Aug. 2016 (it is already a confirmation that - after more than 2 weeks - the post-surgery complications are still there):


The azithromycin prescribed by Dr. Dao in August, 2016, in connection with the complications of 2 teeth's removal and gum surgery around the tooth number 16. (see above)


I saved a number of receipts, which confirm that I was buying (in the pharmacies) "non-covered" dental medications [prescribed or suggested by Dr. Tenzer and by other dentists for the treatment of complications, left by Dr. Dao's surgery] till the end of November 2016, to deal with complications, provoked by the operation, which Dr. Dao performed. This corpus of documental proof contests Dr. Dao's claim that there were "no complications".


Totally, I paid 87 dollars for different medications, linked to post-operative complications after Dr. Dao's surgery. For some people, it could be a very little amount of money, but for us, in our marginalized socio-economic situation, aggravated by my urological drama, politically-motivated persecutions, and preparations to our daughter's wedding party: it was a gigantic expense.


By his refusal of further follow ups, Dr. Dao has subjected me to more torments, inconveniences, and a need to address to other dental specialists, who, in turn, did not want to treat complications, which another dentist inflicted. Certain documents testify about my tremendous physical and psychological suffering, endured by long-lasted complications of the dental surgery performed by Dr. Dao, who refused to treat them.


Dr. Dao's refusal to mention the complication in his letter (to Dr. Tenzer) was a very serious mischief, which deprived me of the option to treat those complications as a medical necessity, and, therefore, disconnected me from any medical help (in regard of my socioeconomic situation).


Dr. Dao's refusal to specify the gum surgery (a deep cut and dissection (removal of its part) of the gum and removal of the cyst) in the same reference (letter): it was a very serious violation, including 1) illegal concealment of medical information; 2) lie concerning the purposes and the causes of a surgical procedure; 3) patient's exposure to danger by the concealment of medical information on new growths, details of the surgical procedure, and its possible complications.


Meanwhile, even by the remained (after the operation - performed by Dr. Dao) defects anyone can draw a conclusion about a deep dissection of the gum.


On the place of the tooth number 16, the gum is 2.5 times lower than on the place of the neighbor (next) extracted tooth number 15.


[Running forward, I will add that this gum remained 2.5 times lower than the general gum level forever].


It is not excluded that, when Dr. Dao broke one or two alveolar jawbones while pulling out the teeth, he understood it during the operation, and began to cut deeply the gum to get out the splinters.


In that case, he told lies to me, when he said at the final stage of operation that the cyst - after all - is there, and, therefore, it is necessary to cut very deeply the gum and to remove its piece - together with the cyst.


Actually, the fracture of jaw ossicles because of Dr. Dao's actions was the reason of the deep section of the gum, and he just covered up tracks, without having reported anything about the incident, and having lain concerning the reason of the additional operation.


Perhaps, the cyst was actually there, and the alveolar bones were broken, too, constituting both reasons for the gum very deep dissection surgery. But Dr. Dao concealed the second.


Except those evidences, which present the irreversible complications of the serious damaging dental operation on the gum (despite Dr. Dao's assurances that the gum "will reshape itself" (will anew be created), I have pictures, which I took as soon as I was able to open my mouth slightly more widely. These pictures - taken soon after the operation - show the scope and the depth of the section, and shows also the stitches, which were put to sew the ruined gum to the basis. No doubts that the professional experts could conclude the truth about the surgery - judging by these pictures what really happened.


A CAD scan and an anamnesis of a good dentist could confirm the assumption of the alveolar bones fracture, but the corrupt Montreal dentists, who put the cover up of their colleagues and their corporate solidarity higher than the safety and health of the patient, refused to do such a scan and to draw conclusions.


One of them, a top-class expert, avoiding commenting on the assumption of the alveolar bones fracture and having refused to do the CAD scan, nevertheless, confirmed the gum bad injury in the area of the extracted tooth number 16, and an additional injury around the upper tooth number 17 by some dental tool (perhaps, it was the place of the emphasis). And this secondary gum injury - not only the area of the operation - began to heal only after several months. (3 months left only till more or less general healing started).


[In addition to this 2017 description, and running forward: there were also some other injuries from dental tools - around the upper tooth number 1-3, which could play a role in the later formation of lesion on the upper palate.]


I could address to Dr. Tenzer, because, I think, he is one of just few people, who would do the CAD scan and would tell honestly whether there was a fracture, but - as HE sent me to Dr. Saleh clinic, it was inconvenient to me to address to Dr. Tenzer (obviously, from the ethical reasons).


I also did not want to set up Dr. Tenzer under a blow, because the influential Dr. Saleh, the chief of a big known clinic in a very rich area (serving rich clients), could - slightly that - crush Dr. Tenzer as some small insect and to smear him on a wall.


When I came to Dr. Saleh clinic for the first time, the secretaries appeared quite lovely ladies, and further behaved properly. (Only one of them, in my opinion, sometimes behaved familiarly and vulgarly). They told me to sit down in the waiting room and to wait, and immediately began to call somewhere by telephone. I assume that they called Dr. Solomon (Benjamin) Saleh, and that, having learned that the patient showed the back of his social benefit "carnet" - instead of a private insurance or money, - ordered to transfer me to Dr. Dao.


It is possible that everything was absolutely not as I suggested, and Dr. Saleh - is a wonderful person. But such a scenario logically arises from the entire idea of the finished picture of the atmosphere, which developed in this clinic and in my situation.


If the situation would have developed in a different (positive) way, then Dr. Saleh would realize that Dr. Tenzer did not refer me personally to him without a reason, and would occupy by my treatment himself.


However, as everything happened as it happened, then, Dr. Saleh stand up his colleague Dr. Tenzer (who referred his patient to him taking into account the complexity of the case), and also set up his colleague Dr. Dao, having charged him to take care of a case, which was too complicated for his insufficient experience, not to mention that he set up the patient - who trusted him.


Among the nurses, some came across inconsiderate and rough: for example, that one that did the X-ray. But, despite everything that the operation did to me, Dr. Dao seemed to be human by nature, but bound and destroyed by the criminal corporate world.


He agreed to wait when I reported that freezing did not work yet. [On the other hand, he might have no choice if his patient was sure that the anesthesia doesn't work yet, and resisted the immediate surgery...] He offered twice (at first - after the removal of the 1-st tooth (tooth number 15), and then - before cutting the gum) to postpone the end of the operation and to transfer it to the next day: overwhelmed by the compassion to his patient and also (perhaps) because he was afraid not to cope with the removal the difficult 2-nd tooth, though - if there was already a fracture of an alveolus bone, and he wanted to cover up tracks - such a scenario was extremely unprofitable. (Possibly, I did a mistake, not agreeing to postpone the surgical procedure; but - in my state of that time, with a deep depression, - I just could not act differently: that the Sword of Damocles should hang over my head again - the nightmare postponed for days or weeks).


But also, Dr. Dao should not have undertaken the removal of 2 very difficult teeth with an abscess and a gum cyst if had not enough experience and confidence, and if he had NOT ENOUGH TIME!


The questionable (if not dubious) practice of treating 2-3 patients at the same time is widely accepted by the dentists, but it is not always so dangerous or potentially harmful. For example, Dr. Tenzer was also sometimes treating two patients in 2 different rooms, but under fundamentally different conditions. Firstly, he never treated 2 patients with difficult cases: if one patient needed a tooth removal, then another patient came merely for examination and evaluation, and, so, Dr. Tenzer could leave such a patient at any minute, while a 3-rd patient with a difficult case was meanwhile waiting in the waiting room. Secondly, a patient, who used to come for a surgical procedure, was NEVER left alone: if Dr. Tenzer was occupied with another patient, one of his assistants was always staying with the "difficult" patient. On the contrary, Dr. Dao agreed to be engaged in 2 dental surgeries simultaneously, which was an unacceptable act, and he and his associates left me alone for a long time after the injections of the local anesthetics.


If I agreed to delay the continuation of the surgical procedure, and to reassign it to another (probably, very distant: it was necessary to wait until the 1-st wound heals) day, it was also extremely unprofitable to Dr. Dao, and would probably be perceived by his clinic as an emergency.


Everything that happened, happened probably NOT ONLY because of non-professionalism or irresponsibility of Dr. Dao, but because he was exhausted - especially because he just finished another difficult operation, which he did to other patient, - and was not able to perform the next operation at the professional level by definition.


And, apparently, it - possibly - was no choice of Dr. Dao, but it was a scenario, which was strictly imposed on him by the clinic (most likely?).


Then, he agreed to see me several times without registering an appointment and out of turn, sympathizing with my situation. He prescribed Azithromycin, though, besides, it was unprofitable to him - since this prescription pointed at surgery's complications, which he denied. And, at last, he just spoke with me humanly and behaved properly: not like many other doctors...


I tend to explain everything that happened (formally due to Dr. Dao's fault) - by the rigid regalements and frameworks in the clinic; by the unfairness, cruelty, and savage line (making acceptable killing for profit) of the SYSTEM; and by that fear, which developed in this SYSTEM and in this clinic (which literally smothered in him the doctor) inside Dr. Dao, who was terrified by his eventual medical error, failure, accident, or even causeless claims of the rich spoiled patients. And, because I can feel the emanation, which contains the emotional and cogitative "cloud" around every person, I felt something very ominous that did not allow Dr. Dao to act responsible, to work peacefully: an emanation of some threat that literally hung over him; something, which could be even more terrifying than a ruined career. What could he have been threatened with - in case of ruining clinic's reputation? Death? Kidnapping of his relatives? Deportation to some country where he could be tortured? Who knows? But my whole intuition, everything that I understand in people: everything confirmed my assumptions.


On the other hand, if - in Canada - the criminal practice of the tremendous concealment of medical errors and medical crimes did not run the show, Dr. Dao would be afraid of nothing, and would dare to reject the scenario of treatment (imposed on him) of two patients with difficult cases simultaneously (at the same time), being broken off between two medical offices.


And, if a threat did not hang over his head, he, perhaps, would do also the operation better, and there would be no most painful and "long-playing" complications?


If not mutual responsibility and if physicians were not exempted in Canada from any liability for their acts, then doctors would have the right to a medical mistake, and then any miss would not threaten with the end of their medical career.


In short time after the removal of 2 teeth and the cyst on the gum, I suddenly paid attention that practically in that area (the area of the operation) the cheek "fall in", causing a cosmetic defect at the level of ugliness and also the whole mouth became slightly contorted.


Of course, only experts are able to establish the dependence between medical errors, made in Dr. Benjamin (Solomon) Saleh's clinic - and these front defects, but on time and on chronologic events clinic's role is obvious.


CHAPTER 4


2 - 5 August 2016.

It is impossible to describe what I went through until the wounds began to heal a little.


A long strip of flesh, with the surgical threads on its end, got out of the middle of the gum, in the area of the extracted upper teeth, hanging over below the lower teeth.


Then this strip came off in general. Seams (threads) were not dissolved and did not disappear 3 or even 4 weeks. And, though the pain, as it seemed, became less intensive few days after the dental surgery, in one or one and a half week the extreme pain has built up again, becoming even stronger than before.


Since Friday, July 29, 2016, suddenly ALL ruined gums began to hurt again, and this pain constantly amplified.


On Tuesday, August 2, 2016, at 8:45, I paid an urgent visit to the clinic of Dr. Dao, and reported a rapid worsening of the gums' situation, and demanded an X-ray or CAD image of the area of the extracted teeth, and also of the next tooth (2-nd molar), asking to do something about my suffering and about the inflammation, pain, and - causing the general indisposition - acute deterioration.


The doctor told that everything is healing perfectly, and kicked me out home.


At home, I realized that there formed a tumor (a bump) around the next tooth (number 17; 2-nd molar), and that the gum around it hurts as an open wound.


Next day, Wednesday, August 3, 2016, I came to Dr. Dao again, and reported an infection on the operated gum and around the next tooth.


Dr. Dao examined the specified area, and told that he doubts that the next tooth is affected by infection (as well), but agreed to prescribe an antibiotic.


I asked Erythromycin, which the Dr. replaced with Azithromycin. The course of Azithromycin was prescribed for 5 days, but - in more than 48 hours - no improvement occurred; on the contrary, the situation became even worse.


My self-diagnosis "herpes simplex" was indirectly confirmed by circumstances: before and after the dental operation my wife "forced" me to eat at least a little bit of sweets to gain weight. (Also, after the dental operation, when I could not eat anything firm, we dissolved up to 2 portions of sweet ice-cream). And sweet often provokes herpes.


This whole new saga with the "devil-may-care" attitude, and even deliberate negligence: what is it? A consequence of lack of money (instead of a payment check or a private insurance, I came with a social benefit's back-check granting the right for free services)? Or Dr. Solomon ("Benjamin") Saleh (the actual owner of this clinic) also intentionally induced Dr. Dao to provide me with the "cut-down" medical care, because wanted to signal Dr. Tenzer thereby: like, do not send me more impecunious patients?


And this new serious misfortune (again with a potential threat of further and painful complications and physical tortures!): just a new stratification on the whole lots of other terrible misfortunes.


The date of my older daughter's wedding came closer, and I grew cold with a thought: what if suddenly I will not be able to go to the wedding at all!


The most solemn, most joyful minute in my life! And what upset it will pose to my daughters and my wife!


3 August 2016, Wednesday.

A new urgent visit to Dr. Dao, at 11:30.


It is possible to call Dr. Dao's attitude not quite "bad", but there was an element of ostentatious mistrust to my complaints and his attempts to dump all problems on my "imaginary" "unwillingness" to wait until "the wounds begin to heal", or, i.e. a criminal-minded attempt to dump his personal guilt on his victim.


5 August 2016, Friday.

On Friday, August 5, 2016, it was the next - and the last one! - visit to Dr. Dao (10:50), concerning the ongoing pain and other complications (which could not be removed by any additional pain-killers), like the resumption of the ruined gum bleedings, ongoing infection, very painful hardenings and "kernels" ("grains") around the area of the performed dental operation, and other problems around the operated area.


I told Dr. Dao that I grope a serious and painful hardening in the operated gum, and also around the next (17-th) tooth, and, besides, 2 especially firm "kernels" in the middle of the operated gum (from the outer side), and also on a gum (sideways) around the next tooth.


I told that, if the antibiotic does not help, then, perhaps, it is a viral infection, and it is necessary to do a swab test, and to send it to a laboratory to know if it is herpes, human papillomavirus, or something worse.


He said that the 2 "kernels" are - supposedly - blisters (empyema, sores), but "there is nothing terrible", "everything will pass by itself".


He said that he guarantees: it is not oncology.


See below: Doctors Saleh - Robin clinic's business card:


I answered that I doubt that the "grains" were "blisters", and that - even if it is "not oncology" - the dental surgery's complications are very significant, and I demand a second opinion, an X-ray, ultrasound, and CAD exams of the affected area.


Besides, I said if even they are "blisters" (empyema) - it is the first and main symptom of a "herpes simplex" virus.


In reply, Dr. Dao said that he, all the same, will not do a swab test, and, in general, refuses to exam and to assess my post-operative dental complications: to give me "a lesson" and to persuade me "not to come" "every day", which I regarded as an order not to come any more - and to seek the further assistance from Dr. Tenzer and in other dental clinics.


Later, in August, a red spot appeared in a corner of the upper lip, near the site of June's dental surgery, where 2 teeth were extracted and the operation on the gum was performed. I turned to a walk-in clinic, and there I was told that it is herpes. My assumptions received a stone-strong confirmation...


Unfortunately, I don't have documents from August 2016, from Metro-Medic, under the hand right now, but I hope that I can find them later if needed. However, another prescription, from December 2015, can serve as an indirect proof that 9 months prior to Dr. Dao's surgery I already had dental infection-related herpes. See below: the prescription concerning herpes in the corner of the right upper lip (another prescription was also related to facial infections problems, and might be also indirectly (or directly) connected to untreated dental infections):


And, still, Dr. Dao's role in my suffering is secondary, because the major guilt lays on the Canadian ruling elite, which enjoys the full and complete set of dental services without restriction, but denies dental care to the majority of Canadian citizens, depriving them of the most fundamental dental care (the treatment of the caries and the canal), forcing to extract healthy teeth, and taking away the joy of life from every underprivileged person: from babies and children, to the old folk...


14 August 2016.

Just now there passed nearly exactly 6 months from the moment of my nightmare's start.


The torture continues.


And all hopes that I will be left alone, that they will cease to pursue, surveille me, play dirty tricks, soil, carry out diversions, and will begin to provide an adequate medical help, at last: faded more and more...


The attitude towards me does not change, and it can be connected with the general global process, and, it seems, there are more and more populist governments in the world, and the real world-wide brown regime with a pre-war antagonistic confrontation was already almost set. They call each other "fascists", but, in reality, they are ALL Nazis, only divided by political and military blocks and their common aggressiveness and war-mongers' bloodthirst.


In reality, all "left" and neo-"liberal" governments are similar to the "right-wing" governments, only with the opposite sign, having developed the cultural genocide against the European people and against the heritage of the Christian civilization.


The confrontation between different "camps" (as it was in 1940-s) - is an inevitable consequence of this new breakthrough backward, towards the "dark times", and there is no moral superiority of the Canadian foreign policy over the policy of the totalitarian states also in mention.


Unlike the domestic policy of Canada, still rather more human than the policy of other parts of the global Anglo-Saxon empire, its foreign policy went to the side, opposite to the traditional policy of Canada after World War II, dictating to others the notorious totalitarian, tyrannical imperative of Bolsheviks: "Who is not with us, that is against us". In this ominous political situation, I am - a person, who is by himself, "for no one", but for the abstract humanitarian principles - I am in the most vulnerable situation.


And, because, besides, most of my works were written basically in Russian, bad guys already (at least therefore) see an alleged pro-Russian position in this alone (though any person older than a baby clearly realizes that I am by myself: neither pro-Russian, nor pro-Chinese, nor pro-Ukrainian, nor pro-Israel, nor pro-Arab, or "pro-anything else" (in my works and views), but a pure defender of humanitarian principles and an objector of any cultural or physical genocide against any group of people, and, first of all - against my white race). Not my ideological conception of "pro" or "contra", or something else, but my strong position of a defender of peace and cooperation between nations, and my opposition to any possible war between people of the white race (instigated by the adepts of a bloodthirsty cult, the most bitter enemies of the Christian religion and pre-Christian European worships, and members of secret and half-secret societies): this infuriated monsters against me and against my peacekeeping activity.


The urological drama; dermatological infection; gastrointestinal infection (I endured almost a lethal colitis); nearly 4-monthly epic of the cysto-litholopaxy procedure, and all urological complications of the deliberate damage inflicted by Dr. Morris and other doctors; deliberate post-operative damage, inflicted by 1 or 2 members of the medical staff, including a post-operative unit nurse, who expelled me from the hospital right after the surgery with all visible symptoms of the bladder perforation; the ichuria (retention-obstruction: the most terrible experience); 7 outbreaks of a life-threatening Enterococci infection; post-cystoscopy's life-threatening complication in the situation, when the medical help was sabotaged; possible short ischemia of the right half of a brain (mini stroke); deep depression; micro heart attack: all these and many other unfortunate events (it is not possible even to mention everything): are the result of the deliberate ruination of my health.


Since July 22, 2016, there is a new spiral of the tortures: the inhumanly and neglected performed dental surgery and removal of 2 teeth, which caused next unspeakable suffering; and the wounds don't heal and not treated, and, concerning the post-operational infection, I receive no help. The gum around the 17 tooth, next to the site of operation, hurts; and also the gum higher than the operation's site hurts, and, except the common painful area, it is possible to grope 2 especially painful "kernels": abscesses or tumors, or something else.


But a swab test, biopsy, X-Ray, CAD, and other tests were not done; diagnosis have not been announced; a short (5-days) treatment by antibiotics gave nothing (I insisted on different antibiotics); and no treatment provided.


Meanwhile, concerning other problems, my family doctor administrated a transrectal scan, but, in the hospital - instead of it (July 29, 2016), they did a usual abdominal-pelvic ultrasound. But even this ultrasound was, rather, actually sabotaged, because it was claimed in this ultrasound's report that, allegedly, liver, kidneys, gallbladder, etc. - are "unremarkable", and aorta and pancreas are "not visible"!


(The more detailed description of what exactly happened is given in the group of comments about a number of tests and exams: see the records on Wednesday, July 20, 2016).


The only thing that was "visible" and "remarkable" - there were the same details that already have been stored in the database on former ultrasounds (from where the whole report was rewritten). Therefore, it is even impossible to judge about the BPE, because just the same indicator already presented in one of former ultrasound reports, and was probably simply rewritten from there.


This is a very ominous turn.


Some sums of money sent by the admirers of my musical and literary works from Italy, Russia, and Austria, I already spent on private medical procedures, and any other money by postal orders are not expected. Besides, the last 2 money orders, which were sent from Italy, just vanished somewhere, probably, confiscated by international political gangsters, or by the Canadian government, and, if the second assumption is correct, it signifies that - in the near future - the Canadian Harper-Trudeau anti-libertarian regime will employ the confiscation of money collected by fundraisers for protests, demonstrations, or for political opposition's actions...


The technician, who was carrying out the ultrasonography exam, checked everything in the most thorough way, including the liver and the right kidney, commenting what she's seeing (some liver abnormalities (so-called "fat liver), and so on); and I know that she is a good expert), so, consequently, there are no doubts that there were some "not unremarkable" details, and that there was no obstruction to see the abdominal area clearly, and, thus, the report's claim is not correctly feasible.


Then the technician told me not the leave the examination office, because the doctor-radiologist will come for carrying out some additional manipulations. But nobody came. This was also strange (unregular). It seems that the diagnostics is carried out very precisely and carefully - only not for me and not for my doctors, but for someone else... Only they, those "others": probably, the only people, who receive the correct results of my diagnostic procedures.


The "transrectal scan" (July 29, 2016; on requisition of my family doctor) once again was made a "usual" ultrasound, and, besides, with "zero" effectiveness, because "it is looked through nothing", as everything (besides 2 already known problems) was "unremarkable" (while other ultrasounds, which I passed in alternative or in private radiologes, clearly showed a number of departures from the norm) or "not visible".


15 August 2016, Monday.

On Monday, August 15, 2016, I went (on foot) to Verdun Hospital - where passed tests and also walked to recording studios in St.-Henry and St.-Jacques West neighborhoods, where rehearsed with Tania (the violinist) for recording a piece of music for my daughter's wedding (I composed this music), and - when we came back home, and I turned on the computer, - a message jumped out on the screen "activate Windows... for activation...", etc.


So, I passed the laboratory tests on August 15, 2016, in the French Verdun Hospital, but the test of microbiology culture was not done, under that supposedly pretext that the biochemical analysis did not assume an infection. But the laboratories should not "reduce" doctor's requisition's indications, and "to dispute" a medical prescription. The laboratory has to carry out everything that the doctor specified in the requisition on the analysis.


17 August 2016.

The operated gum still causes an intolerable pain. It is impossible to touch it not only by finger, but even by the tongue. I am not able to eat normally.


18 August 2016, Thursday.

On Thursday, August 18, 2016, I had a rendezvous with the gastroenterologist, Dr. Szego, appointed at 9:15 in the morning.


As always, it was necessary to spend the whole day in Royal Victoria Hospital, literally till the afternoon. This new mega-hospital is overcrowded, and the medical care here is million times worse than in the old Royal Victoria Hospital. It was, certainly, built by crooks and money-launderers, for no other reasons as mega-scam, which did not improve the situation in the domain of the public health care, but, on the contrary, just worsened it.


The police are intercepting me again - at the previous level.


Since May 17, 2016, they, it seems, announced a timeout, but now everything returned into place. Police escorts, hails from police cars, stoppings and interrogations (where I go, why, in what occasion), etc. - are there again.


There were several new shutdowns of the Internet and phone.


Certainly, not accidental.


A virus was sent (via the Internet connection in our apartment), which practically destroyed a very expensive and prestigious laptop-computer of my older daughter. With the problems with the guarantee (a typical vendors-crooks' practice in last 4 years, in the situation when all states are waging an undeclared war on consumers), it was necessary flushing bios and undertaking other risky operations. I sat over 48 hours in front of this computer, without unbending my back and without going to bed. It was necessary to rescue - at first - the files from the hard drive, then to restore the system from the backup, then to reinstall programs, etc. In the end of this operation, my vision became blurry. Maybe, the virus was sent not occasionally to our household?


23 August 2016, Tuesday.

On Tuesday, August 23, 2016, I passed the audio-test (hearing exam) at St. Mary's Hospital, appointed at 9:00 in the morning, in the office B-272.


This test was appointed by Dr. Sejean, who sees his patients at his private office on Queen Mary Street, and in policlinic of St.-Mary Hospital's OPD clinic (C) 7th Floor).


This otolaryngologist met me hostilely already from the very first time, when he saw me at his private office on Queen Mary Avenue.


Perhaps, it was somehow connected to Dr. Morris, or with my complaints to the ombudsman of the St. Mary's Hospital, or with something else that this doctor knows about me. Otherwise, it is impossible to explain his aggressive hostility, almost undisguised hatred in any way.


Therefore, I tried to pass to other otolaryngologist for a long time, but, as well as in a case with Dr. Morris, it appeared not so simply.


At the end of November - beginning of December, 2016, I endured one of the most painful and tragic periods in my life.


The "vague" (since it could not solve my problems by definition) litholopaxy operation (first, left a number of complications; and, secondly, initially not solving all problems, which resulted from the unethical and prejudice actions of the urologist, Dr. Morris, and other doctors, and medical institutions); the wait for the following urological operation and stay in uncertainty concerning its date and possible results or consequences; the whole new drama of the painful and devastating dental surgery, which left a number of serious complications and injuries, with a probable fault of Dr. Saleh's clinic regarding this drama); heavy depression provoked by actions of Dr. Morris and other doctors, and crimes committed against my health in several emergency departments, and in other departments of Montreal hospitals); further deterioration of my vision and hearing, and the development of complications after the traumas (possible brain injuries) caused by inexplicable cases on November 3, 2005; January 7, 2013; and on June 21, 2016, and their consequences, including vitreous body detachment and deterioration of vision and hearing; new (after November 3, 2005; January 7, 2013; June 21, 2016) sharp deterioration in hearing provoked by the events on January 7, 2013 and June 21, 2016, and 3 incidents with an inexplicable vertigo and brutal, cruel treatment and sabotage in emergency departments; almost total loss of voice, which was followed by episodes, when (for the unknown reasons) the nose use to be "bunged up" (blocked); and many other health problems: all this not only caused the demoralizing, oppressing impacts on my whole life, but also interfered with my normal functioning and communication with people, undermining the bases of my human existence.


It was a great human tragedy developing against the background of the sadistic attitude to my health problems in some medical institutions and public services, continuation of persecution by police, and cruel provocations, which inhumanity has amplified my depression and the declining of the general state of health.


This whole mountain of personal misfortune was amplified even more by my professional tragedy, as, for a musician, the loss of hearing is the end of everything that filled existence with great light of creativity, and allowed to be reconciled somehow with even a saddest reality.


I tried to explain all this in my letter to Dr. Sejean after his very first attempt to shift the fault for his own unwillingness to see me and to provide medical help - on his patient (on me).


But this not only did not soften a cruel attitude of Dr. Sejean, but, on the contrary, after that letter, he began to treat me with a bigger rage and cruelty. If he was enraged because the public health system did not allow him to treat me properly and to address adequately to my problems, he had to explain this to me honestly, because he surely understand who I am, and, then, it is evidently, that I would not denounce him.


[See the rest of the report on Dr. Sejean's "treatment" in the series "Who Destroyed My Vision and Hearing", which is a part of this work.]


24 August 2016, Wednesday.

The audiology - a difficult and comprehensive hearing exam - showed that I need a hearing aid: my hearing decreases for 40 percent against the background of even a slightest background noise; the high-pitched sounds were gone for my ears; and I hear only average and low frequencies sounds. For me, the musician, it is a verdict.


25 August, 2016, Thursday.

The perineal dermatitis ones again added itself to my sores - with an acute inflammation and ulcerations (I cannot sit normally again), beside the dangerous colitis (after poisoning by Clindamycin (antibiotic), which was prescribed by the dentist.


The governmental and International policy on antibiotics force doctors to prescribe different antibiotics, instead of one that surely helps (they afraid that the microorganisms will adjust to the same medication, and will mutate). Erythromycin always helped me, without any exclusion, for years, and, probably, this fact paradoxically forced the dentist to change it for Clindamycin.


An infection, either a cyst, or a fracture of alveolar bones, or a bone piece, which remained in the gum, or something else is still ignored by dentists after the dental surgery in July, 2016.


The page with the microbiology culture report, i.e. a test on bacterium, is "missing" again in the latest Ur. analysis' result. It is already the 5-6-th time of microbiology culture disappearance lately (within last 1.5 years ONLY).


Formally, it is necessary to understand it so that the test for microbiology culture was considered (at THIS TIME) non-relevant, under the pretext of lack of deviations in the physical and chemical analysis (density, specific weight - was not even considered). But, first, it does not exclude an infection for all 100 percent; secondly, the quantity of infectious microorganisms on the standard volume of suspension can just be reduced; thirdly, sometimes (let seldom or never) the stated dependence (between the results of the physical and chemical analysis and an infection) is not so expressed; fourthly, the lack of such dependence can be observed at the very beginning of an infection, when a result on microbiology culture is already positive, but its influence on physical and chemical structure did not occur yet; and, at last, fifthly, medical prescriptions cannot (and should not) be disputed by the laboratories and put into dependence on any given preliminary conditions: otherwise - there will be a continuous arbitrariness, chaos and confusion. Plus, for a patient with a long-long history of UT innumerous infection, such a practice of laboratories is not acceptable.


In my case, the long history of microbiology culture sabotage during more than 15 years, such a policy can provoke a laboratory to change arbitrary (falsify) the physic-chemical test's report, just to have a formal excuse not to carry out the microbiology culture test.


All this means an obvious sabotage - by an order of some very high instances, in comparison with which the level of hospital's highest management: no more than a tiny hillock...


At my request, one doctor found out what happened to the ultrasound's report (ultras. from 29 July, 2016).


It turned out that everything was exactly as I assumed.


Presumably, all digital information of scanning was gone, and the ultrasound's report was composed on the bases of few last abdominal and abdominal-pelvic ultrasounds done in the same hospital.


The chronic loss of diagnostics' results is a frightening story. And I am really afraid.


And the fear - is a source of depression and suppression of the immune system.


Without diagnostics I will die. I try to keep as long as I can.


27 August 2016, Saturday.

I visited an alternative dentist, in a different clinic.


This one told me that - during the gum surgery other place was, probably, touched and affected, and the operation ended having left a wound there (after (behind) the tooth number 17).


He said that something, which - to the touch and by the form - reminds a certain kernel: is not a cyst, not a tumor, not an abscess, but a swollen and inflamed scar, which, say, will begin to heal slowly but inevitably.


THIS dentist, too, refused to do a swab test and CAD.


He told that my free public medical insurance does not cover either that, or other test.


When I asked whether he is sure that it is a scar - he told that it is only an assumption.


THIS clinic (as well) performed the X-ray of ALL teeth as a preliminary condition of an assessment by the doctor, though they knew that

1) the dental X-ray - is one of the most harmful;

2) I already did such X-rays twice for the last 2 months, and 4 times during last 3 months;

3) I came not for dental care, but only for one-time consultation; and

4) they did not receive my consent (I warned that I do not give my consent to X-ray of ALL teeth, but they just did not leave another option for me).


If - against the background of other vision problems (vitreous body detachment, etc.) a cataract will also begin to develop - it can be their "merit". And cataract is not an only possible side-effect of too frequent dental X-rays.


I assume that dental clinics do X-rays of ALL teeth of new patients by definition not on the line of medical and health-related reasons, but for the reasons of the pure espionage, collecting confidential information, and committing an illegal invasion into private life of citizens.


Meanwhile - in addition to all other new problems - a serious depression continues to develop again, more and more tormenting. This development is a direct response to the new "Dental Ordeal" and the cruelty of Canadian dental policy involving the situation of millions of less privileged citizens. And, obviously, the new recurrence of depression is the psychic's reaction to Dr. Dao's or / and his clinic's inhuman approach.


The depression is a threat in itself, because if not to win against it or not to sit down on tablets: it can lead to a stroke, a heart attack, or to cause cancer because the depression suppresses the immune system...


Meanwhile, Flomax works worse and worse. It will inevitably provoke (sooner or later) new series of infections and - then - bladder stones again. And the most terrible is if the catheter would be inevitable again (which is not excluded: for a long time).


I try to fight as soon as I can.


29 August 2016, Monday.

On Monday, August 29, 2016, I passed an additional test, to which Dr. El-Hakim directed me.


It was talked (except all the rest) of a question of urgency of the following urological operation.


It is that test (uroflow), on which I systematically insisted (among my other requests) - when was treated (rather: mistreated) by Dr. Morris, and which he systematically rejected.


I passed this test in Lakeshore Hospital, approximately in 20 km from Montreal.


31 August 2016, Wednesday.

On Wednesday, August 31, 2016 - one day after the uroflow test - I was on rendezvous (it was appointed at 14:30) with the non-Montreal urologist, Dr. El-Hakim.


We discussed 5 important issues.


16 November 2016, Wednesday.

I called Dr. Tenzer, the dentist, and agreed with him about the removal of 2 other teeth, because I have no money for their treatment.


Dr. Tenzer warned me before that my teeth are "complicated" - and "it is better" to do an extraction in a specialized clinic. However, the cruel treatment in Dr. Saleh - Dr. Robin clinic, tremendous complications, left by Dr. Dao's surgery, and his refusal to provide further treatment of the injuries, which he himself inflicted: destroyed my trust not only to this particular clinic, but to all "specialized" dental clinics, which are good only for the rich.


Therefore, new Dental Ordeals, which occurred in Dr. Tenzer's office in November 2016, and then in 2018, were initially provoked by Dr. Dao and Dr. Saleh's - Dr. Robin's clinic, so, Dr. Dao, Dr. Saleh, and Dr. Robin are bearing the full responsibility also for what happened by Dr. Tenzer's medical office.


To explain - why I was in a hurry to remove 2 other teeth, while the sores of the injuries, inflicted by Dr. Dao, did not heal yet, and produced significant pain till mid-December 2016, I must refer again to the cyst removed by Dr. Dao: because it was real, no matter that Dr. Dao denied it. The alarm already sounded, and I was afraid that next cysts, fibromas, or tumors could be provoked by any short or (especially) by long-lasted untreated dental infections, and, having no money for dental services, I had no other choice but to pull out all the teeth: decayed and healthy, with no difference.


That was the main (if not only) reason for turning to Dr. Tenzer for a removal of next 2 teeth.


The rendezvous for this procedure was appointed to November 18.


So, as I already explained above, the reason for my decision to pull out the tooth by Dr. Tenzer was connected to the drama, which occurred at Dr. Saleh's specialized clinic, where, because of negligence, and, possibly, discrimination of less privileged patients, I endured serious complications, dental injuries, and 4 months of unbearable suffering, while the clinic, instead of healing the traumas and medically compensating the damage, just kicked me out. So, I considered that, maybe, it is better to pull out the tooth at Dr. Tenzer's office: even if a specialized clinic has more opportunities and doctors, skilled in this particular procedure, the inhuman treatment eliminates all the advantaged for patients like me.


I also visited my family doctor (the visit was appointed at 10:15 in the morning).


On the same day, I passed tests in the laboratory of St. Mary's Hospital.


I had neither forces, nor will to go to other hospital - though there is no trust left in the adequacy of MY analyses' results in THIS hospital. I just went there - because it was the closest laboratory from the bureau of my family doctor, and it was not necessary to go anywhere any more...


17 November 2016, Thursday.

On November 16 and 17, 2016, after just another dental epic, visits to dentists, and - the main thing - IMMEDIATELY (!) after my yesterday's phone call to Dr. Tenzer (with whom I agreed upon an occasion of the removal of teeth appointed to November 18, 2016) I began to be literally bombed by spam such as:


Date: 17 Nov 2016 20:12:48 +0800 [17/11/16 7:12:48 EST]

From: phqlfi

To: leog@total.net

Subject: Dental operating table

Part(s): 2.1?? 2.png 35 KB

Download All Attachments (in .zip file)

Download All Attachments (in .zip file)

1 unnamed 11 KB


Dear Sir or Madam,

We supply baby incubator,

surgical light and dental chair with competitive pric.

Best profit will be good for your market.

If you have interested, pls call us.

Best regards,

Roland,

Dental chair professional

manufactuer

MEDICAL INSTRUMENTS CO.LTD

2016/11/17


If a spam with dental chairs for surgeries advertising, or with dentists-surgeons advertising is suddenly - unexpectedly - send to a person, to whom the procedure for teeth removal is appointed for tomorrow: it cannot be just accidently or "mere coincidence". And it is very scary.


It is not excluded that something similar was thrown - after my phone call - also to Dr. Tenzer, rendezvous with whom for the removal of 2 teeth is appointed for November 18, 2016, or even something connected with me, or something else even worse, like a threat that could enrage him and provoke his nervousness and new tormenting consequences for me...


It means that - if a similar spam was directed to Dr. Tenzer as well: then someone was provoking another Dental Ordeal by forcing Dr. Tenzer out of balance.


18 November 2016, Friday.

On Friday, November 18, 2016, I came to my permanent dentist, Dr. Tenzer. (The procedure was appointed at 8:30 in the morning).


My wife drove me to Dr. Tenzer, and waited for me, but outside of his office, in the downstairs cafeteria.


She did not want to see him, not telling - why.


During our first 7 or 8 years in Montreal, we all (my wife and my daughters as well) were Dr. Tenzer's patients. Maybe, she was feeling some kind of "after-taste", feeling of resentment; I don't know. But her absent served a bad service for my case, in my present situation, and, it is possible that her presence in Dr. Tenzer's office could change a lot for a better outcome.


From the very first minute in Dr. Tenzer's office, everything went upside down today.


This time, there happened several unusual things.


First of all, the secretary opened not mine, but someone else's file in the computer, and only then noticed that this file, in contradiction with its content, had my name in its attributes. Nothing similar even happened before in Dr. Tenzer's office.


One of Dr. Tenzer's assistants - at first - did an X-ray not of the right tooth (not of the tooth, which was necessary to scan). It is already an extreme occurrence. Nothing similar even happened before in Dr. Tenzer's office.


Running forward, it is also necessary to add that - as soon as I got to Dr. Tenzer's assistant, who works with him longer than others, - I noticed sudden and radical changes in her attitude towards me. She (Dr. Tenzer's chief assistant) examined me with shivering hands. This was the 2-nd time in this year, when I noticed inexplicable changes in her attitude towards me.


When I "too slowly" (in her view) reacted to her command to open the mouth more widely, she began shouting and screaming at me (which never happened before).


This always polite, friendly and attentive (and, apparently, kind at heart) woman of Italian (or Jewish-Italian) origins: felt ill at ease now. (Maybe, someone conducted a discussion about me with her?).


Since then, her attitude towards me has sharply changed.


(Running forward: because of her, I had to leave - in 2018 - Dr. Tenzer, because - as I consider - through her fault, the removal of one of the lower teeth went to an excess, and led to serious complications).


She gave - on November 18, 2016 - an anesthesia injection (if I mixed nothing in the records: it is important), and - here it is surprising! - freezing did not work as necessary, and - during the removal of two upper teeth on the left side - at some point - I felt nearly a pain shock. Both "pulling out" tooth ached incredibly this time when they drilled, and crumbled, and cut the gum... This was the next nightmare...


One more unusual detail: for the first time since 1995, they demanded from me to sign a paper on consent (for the removal of two teeth) [the statement of consent] - where it was also written that I am informed of all risks of this procedure, etc. I never signed a similar paper of consent in Dr. Tenzer's office. My consent was always given verbally, because Dr. Tenzer and me: we always trusted each other. However, 3 or 4 times, Dr. Tenzer presented me the consent agreement just for familiarization, without demanding to sign it.


There were also unusual (added, in comparison with the previous forms, which used to sign in the previous years) lines that, in case of complications, I will not have any claims and will not appeal to the court. It happened for the first time since 1994, too. Never before Dr. Tenzer demanded to sign such a document.


It suggested to me an idea that he received a call from Dr. Solomon (Benjamin) Saleh (see above), who (maybe) contacted him to incite Dr. Tenzer against me, and both the assistant's behavior, and all the rest of this appointments unusual things - were linked to it.


But, if it was really Dr. Saleh, but not someone from an enforcement agencies, then, in that case, they had to know (in the clinic of Doctors Saleh-Robin) initially - who I am, and to carry out all the orders, lowered to Dr. Saleh "from above", and, for this reason, having bounced me, with my very complex problem, to a less experienced doctor, who should not have been charged with such a tangled procedure, and this whole story with the "overlapping" coinciding operation of two patients (though such practice IN ITSELF is vicious, but is not surprising at all), too, could be not a chain of accidents at all.


But, considering the unusual behavior of Dr. Tenzer's assistants on this day, and all other unusual facts, through a prism of yesterday's spam undoubtedly connected with the company of persecution and intimidation, and all other tricks used against me, all these unusual things cease to seem such "inexplicable".


Something unusual was also that - after the removal of 2 teeth - I was not given in hands any printing post-operational instructions, and nothing was told orally (when I can start to eat; whether to put ice; what to use for rinsing the mouth; what is contraindicated, etc.).


This time, Dr. Tenzer did not even prescribe any anti-inflammatory that was usually appointed by him after a removal of even of one tooth; especially - 2 teeth.


Nothing was prescribed for me, and also was not given in the hands in the office, and even not recommended for rinsing the mouth.


My financial affairs were at that time so deplorable that I could buy nothing in a pharmacy without a prescription.


It is not surprising that the infection developed on the gum after the removal of 2 teeth.


It extended from the cutter to the next molar, and up to the palate...


Besides, in the gum - there was a tiny fragment, which disturbed me then nearly a month.


When, later, I came to Dr. Tenzer 3 times concerning this fragment, he showed patience and was still attentive; he ordered to do the X-ray, felt the gum, tried to find out what's the matter.


But his same Italian assistant tore and threw, and - with irritation - said to me that there "is nothing".


Dr. Tenzer even sent me to another assistant.


On November 22, 2016, this firm splinter in the area of the extracted tooth (this piece sat absolutely superficially) on the left side was taken out by Dr. Tenzer.


Once again he - one of the few doctors - believed me, trusted in my judgement, treated with trust my assessment of the problem and its nature, and it appeared that I was right (once again).


Unlike other doctors, he did not refuse me an ability to assess objectively the situation coming to objective conclusions of rather possible diagnosis.


If there was someone else on Dr. Tenzer's place, one from those "quack doctors" (whose actions are described in this chronicle), for whom the most "suitable" work - is working in a prison and in concentration camps of the tyrannical regimes: they would dump everything on "hypochondria", and would inflict a lot more suffering and would provoke a lot more complications.


However, irregular occurrences and weird things in Dr. Tenzer's office on 18 Nov. 2016 should signal me that from now on visiting this dentist is not save (even if there are no clues - why exactly). Unfortunately, I did not listen to my intuition, and it was a mistake, which led to what happened in 2018. Still, Dr. Tenzer was perceived by me as one the compassionate and professional doctors, whom I can trust.


But, when - literally several hours prior to a dental operation - someone sends you such an electronic message (and a number of similar to it):


Date: 17 Nov 2016 20:12:48 +0800 [17/11/16 7:12:48 EST]

From: phqlfi

To: leog@total.net

Subject: Dental operating table

Part(s):

2.1?? 2.png 35 KB

Download All Attachments (in .zip file) Download All Attachments (in .zip

file)

1 unnamed 11 KB

Dear Sir or Madam, We supply baby incubator, surgical light and

Dental chair with competitive pric .Best profit will be good for your

market.If you have interested, pls call us. --


- anything can happen...


19 November 2016, Saturday.

There were new doubts in the plan of the urological surgery and in its procedure.


Now the situation developed as such: 2 following operations (after the removal of bladder stones), or 1 "extended" (both surgical procedures rolled into one single (i.e. for one operation), but I did not want to do these operations without a preliminary ultrasound.


In August, I passed an abdominal-pelvic ultrasound, but there is no doubt that the electronic data of this exam either inadequate, or partially missing, and the report was based on the previous ultrasound procedures, which took place before the formation of uric stones and cysts (therefore, if to compare its report to the results from the private laboratories (radiologes) - there is the lack of many details).


The same was in February, 2016, when the ultrasound from Hopital General de Montreal (or, in English, Montreal General Hospital) did not find any abnormalities, but a month later the tomography and 3 ultrasounds from private laboratories (done thanks to financial aid from abroad and the contribution of other people (in Canada) - showed bladder stones and other pathologies.


Meanwhile, bladder pains appeared and all the time increases during its depletion, and (that is even more terrible) even between.


I told few doctors about it.


None the less, no matter how many times I tried to obtain a requisition on a new ultrasound scan from different doctors: useless. Same refusals.


Besides the ultrasound, an additional key for understanding of the mechanism of my problems represented the cystoscopy, which Dr. Morris performed on March 29, 2016.


As I already mentioned, the medical archive of St.-Mary's Hospital and Dr. Morris allowed me to see only the preliminary report, but, till now (almost half a year later!), the medical bureaucracy and the government did not authorize my access to the final report.


[Editing comment: the full report NEVER surfaced; I suffered from life-threatening complications for NOTHING!]


Therefore, I composed 2 separate (very short) faxes to Dr. Morris, demanding (in one of them) an access to the final report of the cystoscopy (29 Mar. 2016), and (in the second fax) asking to explain some of the details in the preliminary report, which, in my point of view, could be useful for the approaching urological operation. I sent both faxed to Dr. Morris, with the following header:


To: Dr. Brian Morris - 5025 Sherbrook Ouest,

Suite 455, Westmount, Quebec, H4A 1S9

Tel.: (514) 485-1333 Fax.: (514) 485-8509

[from Lev (Leon) Gunin, (phone, fax) November, 10, 2016]

URGENT


I did not receive any answer, and then left 2 messages on his answering machine - with the same contents. (Taking into consideration my comment that this information is VERY important for the future surgical procedure, Dr. Morris's silence represented some more serious violations than just the violation of medical ethics).


He ignored my messages as well...


All these events are taking place against the background of the fact that - because of the provocations of the telephone company and Internet service provider, and, besides, because of high cost of their services - it was necessary to change the Internet and the telephone company.


Everything worked (again with interruptions) only several days, and then both phone, and Internet began to be switched-off.


So about 3 weeks passed without Internet and phone, so far, and, in response to our complaints, we received a call from the Telephone-Internet company, and they claimed that the problem is in the modem and that they will send a new one.


This modem arrived on Wednesday, November 16, 2016, after the lunch, but we did not connect the new modem and did not plug it in, and, still, starting from the second half of the day, everything suddenly started to work perfectly, and since then - already nearly 5 days - working trouble-free.


In other words, some people arranged a sabotage of Phone-Internet operation, and dated their sabotage for the arrival of a new modem to disguise the original reason of the malfunctions.


Why it was necessary for someone that we should connect a new modem and what can - theoretically - be in this - new - modem: you should not even guess.


Only one and a half weeks passed since the apogee of the scandal with the prosecutions of several famous journalists in Montreal by police, and interception of their phone talks, and already any newspaper does not mention about this affair, which caused the worldwide resonance (even Assange and Snowden commented on it).


Having read materials on persecutions of the famous Montreal journalists, I recalled the whole 11-years saga of police intimidation, used by the authorities against me...


21 November 2016, Monday.

By 13:00, I arrived to my family doctor.


As I previsioned, he refused to prescribe Erythromycin concerning the dental infection, but this was from his party quite lawful, because - under the protocol - he is obliged to direct a patient with such problems to a dentist.


My family doctor was an only doctor, who appointed (for me) another abdominal-pelvic ultrasound. He also allowed me to copy the printout of the result of my last laboratory analyses.


As I also assumed ("predicted" in advance) in the record for November 16, 2016, the laboratory of St. Mary's Hospital sabotaged the test for microbiology culture again. I wrote in my diary from November 16, 2016: "On the same day, I passed tests in the laboratory of St. Mary's Hospital. I had neither forces, nor will to go to other hospital - though there is no trust left in the adequacy of MY analyses' results in THIS hospital. I just went there - because it was the closest laboratory from the bureau of my family doctor, and it was not necessary to go anywhere any more...".


So it happened indeed.


Once again, the microbiological culture test was sabotaged, under the pretext of "mukus".


The test's report (16 Nov. 2016) does not even contain the section (microbiology culture), which is simply absent from the report.


The whole analysis of ur. represents only one-single page (see below; it is marked "page 1 of 1"). Thus, the paragraph of microbiology culture was not included in this report at all.


It (considering the SYSTEMATIC unwillingness of this laboratory to do this test for microbiology culture) is nothing else but only the change of the tactics of sabotage (see below):


22 November 2016, Tuesday.

On November 22, 2016, I was in the dentist's office again, already at 8:30, where Dr. Tenzer removed a fragment, which remained in the gum after 2 tooth's extraction.


Dr. Tenzer appointed Erythromycin.


However, even after that prescription the infection was not defeated, but became even more acute and aggressive, and, besides, I groped another tiny piece of a bony fragment now (or consolidation?) in a different area of the gum: on the very tip of the hanging from the outer side of the strip of gum's soft tissue, which - before teeth removal - situated approximately between 2 molars (as the birdie sign in the questionnaires). This piece was left after the dental operation, performed by Dr. Dao.


24 November 2016, Thursday.

On November 24, 2016, at 9:00, I arrived to Dr. Tenzer's office again, and - at first - was examined by his other assistant (NOT that that suddenly changed her attitude towards me).


She told that she feels one more firm fragment in the gum, but she's not sure of it.


Dr. Tenzer cleaned all bones in the gums, sewed up the gum, and (running forward) - all complications from the removal of 2 teeth were stopped immediately, including the infection.


Only Dr. Tenzer's intervention stopped the remaining complications left by medical errors of Dr. Dao, who did not want to repair the damage, which he left. It means that Dr. Tenzer did the job, which Dr. Dao was obliged to do after his damaging actions.


(Still, some pain lasted till the mid-December; but it was a "justified" pain: as Dr. Tenzer lanced the gum, cleaned everything inside, then stitched the gum, and it was a significant surgical procedure, which had to give some pain for 1-2 weeks. However, THIS pain could not be compared to the pain, which tormented me more than 4 months!).


Once again, Dr. Tenzer acted adequately and did everything correctly, without ignoring my complaints and assumptions - as some other doctors of dental and of different profiles did.


Even now, when - as though - all problems have been resolved, he - after all - appointed another - additional - rendezvous for November 30, 2016: to see if everything is OK now, and if the infection is gone, but did not begin to declare - as Dr. Dao said - that supposedly "cannot receive patients "every minute".


However, with all Dr. Tenzer's correct and adequate actions and manipulations, and his respectful and human approach, THIS TIME not everything went smoothly - as normally was during almost 20 years.


First of all, it was - at this time - much more difficult to explain what's the matter, but doctor's assistant, a new paramedic (not nurse), told that she feels one tinier splinter (or consolidation), and knows - where it is.


The doctor, however, said that he doubts that it is a splinter, but will remove it anyway - if there is something, and added that it is necessary to level and polish the gum bones and to sew up again, then the wound will be healed, and everything "bad" will pass... He was ready to "clean" both gums: the area of Dr. Dao's surgical operation (right side), and the area of his own operation of teeth removal (left).


I was against it - since wanted to visit another dentist, looking for an alternative opinion. Such a long and tormenting complication made me broken and disoriented, against the background of other health problems.


Dr. Tenzer told "well, then we will just remove this piece of the gum", but himself, instead, began to perform those procedures, which we discussed before. With the dental tools in the gum - I could not stop the operation any more. Dr. Tenzer did the right thing, and I was wrong in my unwillingness to allow a relatively significant new operation, but, still, he had to explain the procedure better, because it was clear that a patient, who is suffering more than 4 moths from non-stop terrible pains, not always guided by "science", but sometimes "guided" by pain.


Finally, I appreciated Dr. Tenzer's idea and accepted it.


But - before they began to sew up the wound - I asked again whether the tiny fragment is removed, and whether the tip of the soft tissue, which is hanging from the outer side, is cut off.


The doctor asked if I feel any splinter now, but - this time - the dose of Novocain was larger, and my tongue lost its sensitivity; moreover - both tampons and all the rest - became an obstacle, so I could feel nothing, and told about it, again very accurately having defined the location of a fragment: on the very end of the strip of a longer soft tissue, which went from the edge of the outside gum like a checkmark.


Right now I could not detect if this piece of a fragment is still there, or was removed... But it immediately became clear that there is a considerable relief...


When, from Dr. Tenzer, I went home by Metro, 2 police officers, one white, and one black, intercepted my way at the last transfer station (which is Lionel Groux), and the white policeman approached me, passing by me, and intentionally shouldered me. It could not be accidental.


Then, when I left - going up the escalator - at my station, the last (second) escalator was faced by 2 other police officers, who stopped me, ordered to get out my Metro smart card - and scanned it with a special device.


If someone says that I was stopped "accidentally", I will answer that - if not a feint of 2 police officers at Lionel-Groux Metro station - and if I resolutely would not resemble someone who is capable to jump over the levers of automates - and to go without ticket: I would believe in an accidental interception.


25 November 2016, Friday.

It is clear, that I addressed not in a specialized clinic, but to Dr. Tenzer (concerning the removal of 2 next teeth (since there is no money for their treatment) - because exactly there (in the specialized clinic) they ruined the whole gum and did a heap of complications (see the report about the previous events).


But - again - I came across the next nightmare.


However, unlike the specialized clinic, Dr. Tenzer coped with the teeth removal complications incomparably better, not to mention that he showed incommensurably greater compassion and humanity.


Fantastically bad luck, or something else?


There is no wish to think of it...


As for complications and difficulty of teeth extraction: it is, perhaps, connected with the fact that I have unusually strong and very strongly sitting teeth, which could serve me "up to 100 years old age" if I had money for their treatment and prevention, and then it would not be necessary to pull them out.


It is necessary to emphasize as well the following: both Dr. Tenzer, and my family doctor (therapist) - receive me at any time when I came, without an appointment. (I mean: last 2 or 1 and a half years).


In Canada, and, especially, in Quebec, such an opportunity is available only for "2 and a half" patients (for a very tiny minority of the ruling class' representatives).


Ordinary Quebecers wait for a visit to a doctor for months. And I as though live in another reality... then - why do I complain?...


In the field of the health care domain, a complete disaster was outlined in the last 2 years.


The federal Canadian minister called this situation a national disaster. Newspapers were toppled by a message that one female resident of Quebec waited for a visit to a gynecologist... 5 years!


Actually, no good treatment of several knowing doctors (excellent experts and lovely people) can compensate the pressure on them of "higher bodies" and medical institutions, sabotage of my analyses and exams, and deliberate damage to my health by OTHER doctors and medical personnel.


In several languages there is such saying as "in muddy water..."


... The present tragic situation in the Canadian health care - is a good cover for all those, who wish to use medicine for political goals, for prosecution of dissidents, for turning the health care into a bullet, muttering under their breath: not to heal, but to kill...


The infection still did not pass completely. Running forward: 3 times the dentist (Dr. Tenzer) put the medicine in a post-operational cavity. It helps very much.


28 November 2016, Monday.

It turns out that ALL last laboratory tests' reports are missing the microbiology culture section: this time, not only involving St. Mary's Hospital, but other Montreal hospitals as well, which destroyed the microbiology culture part and made the results of the analyses sabotaged.


In some cases, the microbiology culture part is just missing; in other cases, the microbiology culture is removed from the report due to alleged (not true) vitamin C intake (which is a lie, because I am not taking vitamin C); in other tests' reports it was indicated that, allegedly, the "low count" (low microorganism's concentration, low volume of sample, or laboratory's error) is justifying the lack of microbiology culture; in other cases, a microorganism was considered "absent", because, allegedly, due to the lack of abnormal count of nitrates, proteins; etc. Totally, I counted 11 types of pretexts for not displaying the microbiology culture part in my lab tests, not speaking about the innumerous examples of microbiology culture part vanishing without any explanation, justification, or pretext. However, because of the SYSTEMATIC character of microbiology culture section removal in ALL my lab tests, all the excuses and pretexts of its sabotage is nothing else but an obvious fraud. The obviousness of this is confirmed by the fact that none of the tests, done outside of Montreal, or on requisition of non-Montreal doctors, was missing the microbiology culture part.


This tendency was confirmed again in the end of November, 2016: a test, which I passed in a laboratory outside of Montreal, contains the microbiology culture part, which did not disappear. It seems, there is no infection... But this did not amuse me, because - if the chronic bladder pain against the background of the absence of an infection continues - there is nothing cheerful here... At best (I hope) the pain is related to spasms or a result of a partial obstruction.


Meanwhile, the depression passes into the background, or amplifies to a former intolerableness.


What will happen after the approaching 2-nd (and 3-rd, if needed) urologic operation: it is not known and unpredictable.


28 November 2016, Monday.

On November 28, 2016, I arrived by 11:00 to Lakeshore Hospital for passing the preoperative tests and analyses.


There I met a very human and sympathizing treatment practically from all employees of this hospital.


November 30, 2016, Wednesday.

On November 30, 2016, I arrived by 9:00 to Dr. Tenzer's office again.


The gum, which is still swelled up, is painful and infected again. (I did not begin a new course of Erythromycin yet).


The doctor put a medicine in the gum again.


DECEMBER, 2016.


1 December 2016, Thursday.

The rendezvous with Dr. Anna Khanonyan (planned at 10:45) - was cancelled. [Anna Khanonyan, a young rheumatologist, appeared to be an excellent specialist, and a very compassionate person. Unfortunately, she left soon for United States.]


13 December 2016, Tuesday.

I managed to achieve, finally, a rendezvous with Dr. Morris on Tuesday, December 13, 2016, at 16:15.


But I managed to attain an audience with Dr. Morris only after my warning that if he still refuses to provide the final cystoscopy's report and refuses to comment on cystoscopy's findings, I should reserve an option to address to him through a lawyer. I forced him to comment on one of the lines in the official report of a cystoscopy of March 29, 2016].


15 December 2016, Thursday.

On Thursday, December 15, 2016, I underwent the abdominal-pelvic ultrasound in Lasal Hospital, on requisition of my family doctor (one more of the uncountable favors rendered to me by this wonderful doctor and decent, honest person).


The conclusion of this ultrasound is differed from ALL OTHER ultrasounds, done in other private and public hospitals' ultrasound departments, because this scan could "see" what other US scans "did not notice in an emphasis" markedly.


The further enlargement of the cyst in the left kidney, and - possibly - formation of one more, still a very tiny, cyst; a stone of 2 mm in the same kidney.


Besides, this ultrasound has found a significant uterus calcification on the right, on the middle line, which, in principle, corresponds to the conclusion of Dr. Morris's cystoscopy's report, where it was written about the obstruction "from "veru". However, Dr. Morris deliberately concealed the calcification.


And, at last, the volume of the residual liquid in the bladder indicates a bad outflow (that - once again - disproves doctor Morris's lie about a "good str.").


19 December 2016, Monday.

At 11:30 in the morning, December 19, 2016, I left a message on Dr. El-Hakim's answering machine (non-Montreal urologist):


1. The surgery date was rescheduled - first - from Jan. 5 to Jan. 26 (2017), and now to 22 of Dec.

2. An ultrasound was done at LaSalle Hosp. 4 days ago, Dec. 15 (2016). They said: if the rapport is not ready yet - call the hospital about the verbal comments (...). Do we need just the uterus outlet widening, or also the so-called "uterus shaving"?

3. Needed an urgent doctor's opinion about a preventive course of Cipro, because of an enterococci infection after any intrusive procedure.

4. Due to severe constipation problem, post-operative strategy may be needed in advance.

5. In last week, my blood pressure used to jump same days from 145 x 90 to 75 x 40, with the episodes of slight vertigo. I must report this before the surgery.

6. I was told by the hospital reprehensive to bring a yellow paper that the doctor gave me, but I did not find it.


I received an immediate reply to my message, and the doctor invited me to a rendezvous on December 21, 2016.


21 December 2016, Wednesday.

On Wednesday, December 21, 2016, I arrived by 9:30 to the office of Dr. El-Hakim (non-Montreal urologist).


All details of the operation were discussed again; risk factors are emphasized again; my approval of actions of the doctor and gratitude for everything that he did for me: were stated for my part.


22 December 2016, Thursday.

In the second half of December, absolutely unexpectedly, the operation - appointed to January 5, 2017 - was suddenly rescheduled for January 26, 2017, though there was a remark "an urgent operation" in the requisition.


It is natural that I tried to obtain an answer to a question: why?


A doctor, who called me (or a nurse?) said that she is not aware of the reasons.


Then I asked her to connect me to her supervisors.


A chef doctor of the "operation unit" personally spoke to me.


On December 19, 2016, I was suddenly called from the Lakeshore Hospital, and reported that the operation can be appointed to any of the next few days, i.e. they presented me with a fait accompli. It was something "déjà vu".


My friends and their friends told me that this is not a very good idea - to have a surgery on the Catholic Christmas, when most of the doctors and best nurses are absent, and when the operation itself can be completed by not the most professional assistants. One of my friends even told me that the "permanent" postponement of the operation was one of the provocations, while an "alternative" provocation is to force me to agree for a surgery on holidays.


[I omit here some pages; the full report on the urological drama is presented in the corresponding book of this series.]


22 Dec. 2016 - the surgery; January-February - its complications

On 22 Dec. 2016: there was a complicated surgical operation.

Instead of the planned term, I spent in the hospital much MORE days, and, at home, I was experiencing a number of serious complications.

I spent more than 1 month in bed, suffering from pain, bleeding (sometimes with blood clots), and other symptoms of complication.

This last post-operational record is showing how dramatic and fragile was my situation. Bleeding proceeded (sometimes with blood clots) up to February 5, 2017.


On January 30, 2016, I was on the post-operational check in the Lakeshore Hospital (9:00).


CHAPTER 5


2017


FEBRUARY, 2017.


7 February 2017, Tuesday.

On Tuesday, February 7, 2017, I was in the office of the non-Montreal urologist (Dr. El-Hakim) (9:50). All problems and all threats for my health, as well as probable measures for my situation's improvement - were discussed.


I noticed - with a touch of worries and sadness - that Dr. El-Hakim is very sick himself. The signs of a serious sickness could be noticed in him, and, because I am not a bad diagnostician, I became nervous about a very bad outcome for him.


Meanwhile, the lack of access to an adequate treatment of arthritis continued after 2017 as well. Partially, the arthritis is surely a product of the sabotaged treatment of the urological problems; partially - a consequence of untreated dental infections (i.e. of the cruel governmental policy, which deprived the majority of Canadians of dental care, because it became oddly super-expensive, and the universal health care policy do not cover it).


I am constantly threatened by the loss of functionality, and - then - by a possibility to find myself in a wheelchair.


AFTER the peak of the urological drama (described here) and other dramatic events, doctors and medical institutions continue to refuse timely, adequate, and operational medical treatment, from the prescription of anti-inflammatory drugs, to endocrinology-related examination, inflammation and infection sources findings, and of the study of the influence of dental care unavailability - for better understanding of the roots of the arthritis, against the background of physiotherapy exercises and other treatment unavailability to me.


After the departure of Dr. Anna Kananyan (the rheumatologist, who moved to USA (she saved me for 2 and a half years from further development of arthritis), the adequate diagnostic procedures are blocked.


The sabotage of the recognition of obvious pathologies by doctors and radiologists continues.


Neither bones density scan, nor ultrasound of the shoulder joint, nor other diagnostic procedures are available to me after Dr. Anna Khananyan's departure.


MARCH 2018


1 March 2018

On March 1, 2018, I was by Dr. Tenzer at 10.00. Now, with no financial resources for dental treatment, I had no other options, but to pull out almost healthy teeth, with the help of Dr. Tenzer, because was tortured and mistreated by the professional specialized dental clinic of Dr. Saleh-Robin.


For more than 1 year the procedure of tooth removals was interrupted by 2 quite serious urological operations, surgeries' complications, other (sometimes, tremendous) health problems, which treatment was sabotaged by the rigidity of the SYSTEM itself, or, in other occasions, and by persecutions and personal difficulties.


2 March 2018

I had a small dizziness at night, from 1-st to 2-nd of March, which was, then, during next days - increasing.


3 - 11 March 2018

From time to time, waves of momentary dizziness (few second) were attacking me, becoming much stronger when I was lying down on the left side. A 6 sec. delay between lying down on the left side - and the beginning of such a dizziness.


7 March 2018

I had another appointment with Dr. Tenzer at 11.30 today.


13 March, 2018, Tuesday

When I came to see Dr. Szego (the appointment was planned at 9.00, but I waited many hours again), he told me again that he retires, and gave me an advice to find another specialist-gastroenterologist.


He also hinted that does not trust the authentic nature of the lab tests' results, and, therefore, cannot prescribe medications to treat the perineal dermatitis. However, he prescribed a new cream, which could fight this problem locally.


15 March, 2018, Thursday

I came to Dr. Tenzer at 9.45.


16-18 March 2018

Since 16 March 2018, a strong headache, accompanied by eyes pain, did not ease even for a minute (a new glaucoma attack?).


22 March 2018, Thursday

In spite of the strong headache, I had to appear at Dr. Tenzer's office at 9.00.

He treated 2 teeth, without treating and filling the canal (because this procedure is devilishly expensive). Formally, he is violating the medical protocol, but, from the humanitarian point of view, it is better to prolong the life of a tooth even without the canal treatment - than to extract a tooth 5-10 years earlier.


24 March 2018, Saturday

My wife gave me a lift, driving me for the appointment at New Royal Victoria Hospital, for left wrist's Ultrasound (room C25139; time - 10:10).

Running forward:

This ultrasound found deformations and abnormalities (in the left wrist), neurotically denied by few doctors and medical bureaucrats, who accused me in simulation or hypochondriac "obsession" by "imaginable" health problems, questioning the veracity of my suffering from an unbearable pain.

The bizarre provocation at the Montreal General Hospital's Emergency Department, described in this work, was based on medics' claim that I, allegedly, came to the hospital with "imaginable" problems. This was refuted by the ultrasound from 24 March 2018.


(See the details in the previous books (parts).


27 March 2018

Strong headache and eyes' pain continues.


28 March 2018

Strong headache, blood pressure (at 9.00) 145 x 81, pulse 91.


29 March 2018, Thursday

Dr. Tenzer at 14.00.


APRiL 2018


9 Apr. 2018, Monday

Because of the unsolved dermatological problems, I had to visit Dr. Wang again (the appointment was scheduled at 15.45).


12 Apr. 2018, Thursday

At 14.00, it was an appointment with Dr. Tenzer. The 1-st lower right molder was extracted with devastating results: swelling and pain did not stop during 5 days, which I attributed to a bad drainage and damage to the alveolar bone.


Pain was decreasing in the following days, but the problems, connected to the alveolar bone and the gum damage just increased.


16 Apr. 2018, Monday

An appointment (scheduled for 14.40) with Dr. Poliquin (the gastroenterologist) met all my expectations.

He appeared to be a true doctor, faithful to the humanitarian mission of his profession, true to the Hippocratic Oath, and compassionately concerned about human suffering. Besides, he, as it looked to me, was a very good specialist.

Dr. Poliquin worked in a small health center at 7715 Boul Newman (near Lapierre), Lasalle Qc (fax: 514-3630492 - phone: (514) 363-6638).

Normally, the waiting time is reduced in such small medical facilities, but (contrary to the norm) I waited almost 4 hours, being admitted at doctor's office only at 18.30.

The doctor and his 2 secretaries (very nice friendly women) did a comprehensive preparatory job, extracting several pages of tests and analyses from the database. Besides, Dr. Poliquin, on my request, searched the archive of the Royal Victoria Hospital, but, unfortunately, without any result.

Yes, he found the mentioning of the endoscopy and colonoscopy, but there were no reports or other medical documents related to these exams.

In the database, it was also mentioned about 1 test for parasites, administrated by Dr. Szego, but no traces of related report were found.

When he looked at (provided by me) paper copies of non-full (with missing pages) colonoscopy report, and a paper, which proven that I really passed an endoscopy, he had to admit that 2 colonoscopy results, 1 endoscopy results, and 1 test for parasites really completely disappeared from the Royal Victoria Hospital's database.

Dr. Poliquin renewed some of Dr. Szego's prescriptions, and administrated new tests for parasites and other pathologies.


However, the tests that he administrated completely vanished all together, with no traces.


Here (see below) - is the requisition of one of these tests, with stamps and marks made by the laboratory staff (the confidential information is removed purposefully). Here is striking a non-matching of the date of the prescription by the doctor - and the date on the lab stamp. The requisition was issued in April 2018, but the stamp is displaying the date of November 2019. I went with the requisition to the lab in April 2018, so, this is already a sign of a scam or provocation. (See below)


17 Apr. 2018

When I passed a blood test at Verdun Hospital's Lab (before 8.20), I felt an intensive heart battery and heart pain.

An aggressive and intimidating police-security surveillance after this test was the 1-st such demarche after 2 urological surgeries.

Waiting in the line for my turn to pass the test, I noticed a disturbing indication of HIV component in the requisition for this blood test.


19 Apr. 2018, Thursday

Only in the middle of April, I, finally, received an appointment with the permanent ophthalmologist at Hopital Maisonneuve-Rosemont's Eye Clinic. The non-stop glaucoma attack and the vision worsening lasted since January 2018, but only 2 months later I was allowed to access the doctor. If the circumstances were unluckier, the consequences could be catastrophic for my vision.


I met Dr. Mark Lesk after waiting 8 (!!!) hours in the waiting room (my appointment was scheduled at 7.50).


(...) [See the full report at "Who Destroyed my Vision and Heating".]


Difficulties with Dr. Lesk arose later, when the System started to squeeze me, denying appointments and medical help in the midst of the most worse acute glaucoma attacks and intraocular bleedings. Unlike Dr. Saleh, who personally intervened few times, booking appointments for me, Dr. Lesk, on the contrary, has excused and justified the System, giving up to the authorities. And, still (running forward), he turned to be the best person among more than more than dozens of ophthalmologists, with whom I had to deal.


Dr. Lesk, according to hospital's card is an "Ophtalmologue, specialiste de Glaucome".


26 Apr. 2018

I had an appointment with Dr. Tenzer at 14.00, but had to cancel it.

Dr. Tenzer's secretary (this time, it was not a member of his family, but another person) rescheduled it to 1 May 2018, the International Workers' Day.

My intuition was screaming that this rescheduling will bring a considerable misfortune. I could not explain, why my intuition should prompt a frightening danger. However, the circumstances did not allow me to go to Dr. Tenzer on April 26, 2018. And doctor's secretary did not have (or just claimed that don't have) another free window.


MAY 2018


1 May 2018

The appointment with Dr. Tenzer for 2-nd right low molder extraction was planned at 13.30.

My younger daughter drove me to this appointment, accompanying me.

She refused to go up to Dr. Tenzer's office, and, instead, went to the downstairs cafe to work there on her doctorate in psychology. She never explained, why she feels such a strong antipathy to Dr. Tenzer that goes far beyond a regular dislike.

Later, I realized that, if she would go with me to Dr. Tenzer's office, the disaster would not happen.

The 2-nd low right molder (tooth) was extracted with enormous difficulties, and with the disastrous complications. The right side of the jaw was, definitely, damaged or even fractured; 2 alveolar bones (minimum) were broken; and a considerable damage was done to gum's soft tissue.

The maxillary trauma has also affected my hearing: it declined since then even more.

I am not in a position to judge about Dr. Tenzer's negligent or medical error. I just feel and see that something bizarre happened, because, in general, Dr. Tenzer is a very good dentist and an adequate dental surgeon. So, either it was a rare and tragic misfortune, or another act of medical terrorism, prepared and executed by the authorities with the help of someone of Dr. Tenzer's assistants.

At 15.20, one of my daughters called Dr. Tenzer's office (on my request; I could not speak at this time, communicating with my family members mostly by gestures), and asked for an emergency appointment, due to the catastrophic consequences of the dental extraction operation.


2 May 2018

Dr. Tenzer personally called back, and - somehow (speaking with great difficulties) I explained him the situation.

He told that can see me tomorrow, at noon.

It took me aback, because - in the past - Dr. Tenzer invited me IMMEDIATELY in case of any urgency. Besides, considering the gravity of the situation, he should see me right away - today, Wednesday, May 2, 2018, not tomorrow.

Consequently, something really wild could be detected not only in the devastating consequences of the tooth extraction, but in the radically changed behavior of Dr. Tenzer.


3 May 2018

An emergency visit to Dr. Tenzer (12:00).

X-Ray, CAD scan, and antibiotics: were denied.

Local anti-inflammatory applied, with no help.

This surprised me even more.

Never before Dr. Tenzer denied his responsibility or accountability in case of any complications after his treatment.

Like Dr. El-Hakim, he used to tell always: "OK, it can be just an unlucky combination of circumstances, but, as a doctor, I should prevision it, so, I carry a full responsibility".

Now, he behaved drastically different.

Something really weird is going on.

After Dr. Tenzer's today's refusal of X-Ray-CAD, and other measures, I decided not to go anymore to him anyways.


Here, below, there is a referral (probably, written by Dr. Tenzer's hand) to Doctors Saleh - Robin clinic again: probably, after a further exchange of the following messages in next 2-2.5 weeks; but, certainly, after me horrific experience, I would never turn into this clinic anymore (see below):


4 May 2018

An emergency visit to Dr. Tran (14.00), in Outremont.


Her medical judgement (after CAD-X-Ray) was the next:

1) a peace of the jaw was broken out by Dr. Tenzer;

2) 2 or 3 alveolar bones are affected (broken? fractured?).


She said that a wide and complicated surgery is needed; but, as she underlined, not only the complexity of such a surgery is risky, but the period of the recovery will be very extended.


The healing will take many months; I'll have to weary a special support; I'll not be able to speak during a long period of time; and the complete period of recovery may last around 1 year.


However, without the surgery, she said, the recovery will last degrees shorter, and the risks smaller. The negative consequences of this option is that 1) my diction may be affected forever; 2) some negative factors may affect my hearing; 3) when I lose most of the teeth, it will be impossible to weary the denture prostheses.


In reality, the choices have presented only theoretically, because such a dental surgical operation would cost tenth or even hundreds of thousands of dollars. And, as justice and fairness for such underprivileged people as I am - don't exists in Canada, and I'll be never compensated for my suffering and for my injuries, inflicted by the caste medical system, such a surgery will be inaccessible for me. Even if - in a fantastic dream - I would be granted such an option: it would be imprudent and risky to fling on mercy of this caste medical system, giving myself into the hands of the vindictive doctors, who may be enraged if I'll would get a court order compensation for a medical error, committed by one of them.


Dr. Tran prescribed erythromycin and novo-profen for an adequate period of time.

However, she refused any official document of her conclusions and the antecedent anamnesis.


I wonder if Madame Tran is a relative of Dr. Dao.


11 May 2018

I visited Dr. Tran (the dentist) at 11.30 today.


17 May 2018

At 15.00, I visited Dr. Tran, the dentist, again.

She continued the diagnostic procedures, and discussed a possible treatment plan with me.


18 May 2018

11.30 - Dr. Tran, the dentist.


I also received an appointment for May 17, 15.00.


17 May 2018

15:00 - Dr. Tran, the dentist.


This new dental ordeal is the best illustration - how the discriminative and socially segregating medical system and one doctor's medical error provoke innumerous visits to doctors, enormous and long suffering, and a long-lasted need in medical help. And, still, the consequences are most often irreversible, and the financial and systemic damage to public health care is devastating.


This system is programmed not to heal, but to ruin health of ordinary patients, because each 2-3 positive medical interventions are accompanied by 1 case of a devastative medical "error" or deliberate harm. Then enormous public and private resources, efforts, time, and actions are needed to compensate at least a little measure of the devastative damage.


The authorities are positioning medical inequality, abuse, terror, and killing for profit as a "health crisis", but this is not a "health crisis", but the burden of medically-generated damage to the public health system. They respond to this alleged "crisis" by even more savage commercialization and privatization of medical services, which is, of course, not a solution, but a further devastative impact on nation's health.


The complete impunity of medical workers in Canada is triggering an avalanche effect, demolishing the very basic foundation of Canadian society and Canada's public medical system. If, in the case of Dr. Tenzer, it was, as I believe, just a medical error, or an intervention of some external sinister forces; then in a number of other cases, other doctors have committed the deliberate damage to my health and my physical and mental integrity, and, still, stayed non-accountable.


31 May 2018

Dr. Schultz, at 9.15.


He refused Naproxen, and prescribed Celebrex.


Still, I believe that Dr. Schultz was motivated by providing the most beneficial and harmless treatment for his patient, because - after 63 - medications like Naproxen can bring some cardiovascular complications and trigger the raise of the blood pressure. However, it could be equally possible that the government's policy simply forcing doctors to reduce Naproxen prescription, irrelatively of the concerns and each personal case.


But the most speaking evidence of Dr. Schultz's ethical approach is that he did not denied the anti-inflammatory completely, prescribing, at least, Celebrex, instead of Naproxen.


The same day, I went out (at 13.43) with the photo-camera, but forgot the eyeglasses, and did not return home, taking photos via the viewfinder (looking with the left eye), in the sun.


When I walked opposite to the Chapito place (near rue Seigniors) - on the opposite side of the canal a man in a white shirt (like a worker of the site) was wearing a strange optical or scanning device with several tubes and "eyes". (It was hanging on a rope from his neck). The device had a screen on the small edge (the man was looking down to see the screen).


Even before coming home I already had a headache, and pain in the left eye, which became red.


I had small dizziness, and nausea for 2 or 3 hours.


Everything points to a new glaucoma attack with an elevated intraocular pressure.


JUNE 2018


6 June 2018, Wednesday

In spite of Dr. Tran's warnings, I decided to find a way for obtaining an access to a complicated dental operation, but, for this, I had to obtain a medical document confirming the traumas, caused by Dr. Dao's and Dr. Tenzer's damaging teeth extraction procedures.


One acquaintance has advised to turn to Dr. Chadi Taoutel, who has his dental clinic on Sherbrook Street (1600 Sherbrook W., 514-521-1434). The goal of my visit to this dentist was to hear an alternative opinion, and to try to obtain an official document concerning my dental injuries.


I came to see Dr. Taoutel at 15.30.


For a short exam, he charged me with a considerable (for us) sum of money, but refused CAD and other - related to a proper diagnostic - procedures.


It was absolutely clear that he does not want to issue any medical certificate, which could affect any of his colleagues. He aggressively and insistently demanded the name of the dentist, who inflicted all my dental injuries, ignoring my replies that "it is does not matter". It must be taken into consideration that I did not tell anything about a medical error or about complications from a dental surgery. In other words, I did not tell - what caused the damage to my jaw, gums, alveolar bones, etc.


I told - in response to his investigation - that I came just for an assessment of my dental problems and plan for their solutions. But Dr. Taoutel perfectly saw that a number of serious dental injuries were inflicted by a dental operation, i.e. by one or two of his colleagues.


So, this dishonest and unfair dentist not only refused a medical summary of my dental injuries (even if I did not complain about any dentist), but also refused to do his duty.


JULY 2018


18-19 July 2018

Today, I found myself under another possible microwave radiation attack, but not of the maximum intensity - as 3 major previous similar attacks, - only partially harmless and more delicately regulated.


After a momentary dizziness (again, when I was near the salon big window, closer to the window with left part of my body), I noticed nausea, headache (left side of the head), and left eye pain with sensing a kind of pressure (probably, elevated (above the norm) intraocular pressure.


This triggered a possible new long-lasted glaucoma attack (left eye).


AUGUST 2018


16 Aug. 2018

With great difficulties, bombarding the secretariat by my phone calls, and reporting about the acute glaucoma attack, I managed, finally, to obtain a rendezvous with Dr. Lesk at 9.00 (the whole appointment, with the waiting time, took today relatively less time: I was assessed by doctor at 12.25).


Dr. Lesk said that there is no cataract advance (his words confirmed my suggestion that the cataract was triggered by the iridothomy laser surgery, and was not an age-related problem by nature).


He also said that sees some scratches in both eyes of unknown nature (this new injuries - the scratches - could appear as the result of another attack by a remote microwave weapon on July 18, 2018); blepharitis infection (which was not present till now); and rosacea of the lower eyelids.


Dr. Lesk prescribed additional kind of eye-drops for securing the stable IOP [running forward: this saved me from innumerous future glaucoma attacks, and, finally, established a "permanent" remission from glaucoma since the end of 2021], erythromycin, and compresses.


It was very strange that the IOP appeared to be 14. When I measured the IOP at home of one of my acquaintances, who had by then an eye tonometer, it showed 24 in the left eye (15 Aug. 2018).


[See the details in the previous books (parts).]


23 Aug. 2018, Thursday

When I met Daniel (at 11.00), police aggressively and intimidating watched us.

The police car 82-15 was the most demonstratively intimidating in my area.


SEPTEMBER 2018


27 Sep. 2018

When I came to Verdun Hospital for blood-urine test, not only the policemen were watching me, but also a young white male in eyeglasses (not fat, a "regular" body shape and height), who, besides, was filming me on his camera.


Inside the lab, he pretended to sit into nr. 4 seat, but it was my number on the screen, so, he was sent to the women that always (with no exceptions) served me.


But today I was served by an oriental person.


After the test, there was a considerable hematoma, which never happened when the previous nurse collected blood.


On my way back home: police car 82-15 - again.


28 Sep. 2018

Heart tightness: 2 times during the day (anything of this nature has never happened before).


30 Sep. 2018

The hematoma - left by the blood test at Verdun Hospital - became painful and hard; strong heart beating (tachycardia) and arrhythmia was noticed since yesterday evening.


OCTOBER 2018


1-2 Oct. 2018, Monday

Heart pain.


17 June 2019, Monday

Today, I had an appointment with Dr. Tran, the dentist, at 13.30.

The last appointment with her was prior to rather a long brake, because, after the evaluation of my situation (during 3 operations of teeth extractions, other dentists damaged the right scull, and broke some of the alveolar bones), which needed a complicated facial-dentist reconstruction operation - unavailable for me because of the enormous cost, - I was left in an uncertainty. I did not know - what to do, - and, puzzled, plunged into limbo...

I suspect that the government blocked the money, which my friends and lovers of my music have sent from Europe for my treatment. I suspect that the initiator of similar money blockages and confiscations was the member of Trudeau government, Christia Freeland, a Jewish-Ukrainian origin, who started to transform herself from a sane morally person and not a bad politician - into a bloody executioner, on who's order personal bank accounts of the Freedom Convoy participants were massively freeze, and people were struggling to fed themselves and their children, to pay the rent, and to buy essential needs. There are several indications that such a fascist tool was used already in 2018-2019 against some of the dissidents.


Dr. Tran assessed the situation, and discovered that 2 lower wisdom tooth have cavities; tooth 46 and 48 are problematic; and upper high right pre-last molar has a cavity under the gum, near the end of the root canal, which cannot be fixed.

She treated one of the teeth, which did not require the treatment of the root canal, and that's all.


OCTOBER 2019


17 Oct. 2019

At 19:00, I had an appointment with Dr. Roi, the dentist, who was practicing not at his own private clinic, but at the clinic situated in East Montreal, very far from my home: 1831 Ontario Est.


However, this appointment was transferred to Nov. 7, 2019, 14:00, because of the flu.


13 - 23 Oct. 2019


Saturday (12-th of October, 2019), we had a party on my grand-daughter's 2-nd birthday.


Next day, the 13-th of October, I was eating darker grapes, when my wife added to the same plate a part of lighter grapes, which was left after the birthday party. We had an agreement that, if she brings some food from outside home, she has to tell me, but this time she just forgot about telling.


I was listening to an interesting radio podcast, and was taking the grapes from the plate almost without looking, automatically, distracted by the radio, and noticed the different-color grapes too late (when already ate several of them). Each of more light grapes was, besides, cut half-and-half (for children, who came to the birthday party).


When I noticed it, I became frightened and worried, because I know that any infection, including a flu, can be disastrous for me if infection's biological material gets to my body massively, like with food, or into the bloodstream.


I really fall sick, with one of the worst flu in my life. Some people around me, judging by symptoms, said that it was already the Covid virus (which, generally, came to Canada only few months later).


18 Oct. 2019


This day, 18 Oct. 2019, I supposed to be assessed by a urologist in Royal Victoria (10:20). (Room D... 3310). However, when they called for confirmation, I had to transferred the appointment to 4 Dec. 2019, because was still sick.


23 Oct. 2019, Tuesday

I went to Metro-Medic clinic, on the corner of Sherbrook and Guy.

I was there at 9:15 - 9:20 a.m.

I received a referral to otolaryngologist.


29 Oct. 2019

Severe complications after the flu have affected my hearing, but, as I decided not to visit Dr. Sejean anymore, the Metro-Medic sent me to another otolaryngologist in a very far away ORL clinic, located at rue St. Luis, ville St.-Laurent (tel.: 514-312-9952; fax: 514-744-8314. 2155), and got an appointment at 13:45 with Dr. Sarah Asulin.


However, as I discovered later, this clinic appeared to be one of the innumerous bogus-public clinics, which receive the public (governmental) financing and resources, but actually treat patients only for money or with a private insurance policy. This is the most massive and the most outraged fraud: the formation of thousands of similar bogus-clinics, which suck public money, but work for private patients.


NOVEMBER 2019


7 Nov. 2019

I had to see Dr. Roi, the dentist, at 14:00, but cancelled the appointment because of the flu.


20-21 Nov. 2019

Another glaucoma attack: pain - Left Eye and L. Temple.


22 Nov. 2019

Suspecting a new glaucoma attack, I visited an optometrist (15:30) at a clinic, located at Sherbrook - McKay, near Concordia (Optique Town, Quebec, 1460 Rue Sherbrooke W.; GOLDEN SQUARE MILE (514) 286-8020).


It looked like a glaucoma attack was confirmed, because - if the IOP pressure on the 3-d day (when the situation already improved) was still - Left eye - 16, Right eye - 19: it suggests the IOP higher than 20 during the past 2 days.


28 Nov. 2019

Finally, I could see Dr. Roi, the dentist (10:00; 1831 Ontario Est).


All very severe problems, which can be equated to war crimes, were provoked by the government, or, more precisely, by the Canadian dental care policy, which exclude representatives of all unprivileged social classes from the number of the true dental care recipients.


Even the teeth removal (extraction) is provided with an enormous hardship for patients in an insufficient socioeconomic situation, and often sabotaged, or offered for free with the lowest standards and violations of the safety protocols.


Such a governmental policy has resulted for me in serious injuries and mutilations.


My right scull was irreversibly injured during teeth extraction; few alveolar bones were broken; and I received a number of other traumas.


Now, if I lose a considerable number of teeth, or all of them, I'll not be able to wear the dentures prostheses, and will lose the function of chewing the food.


And Dr. Roi could not offer any solution. He only repaired 2 fillings (the procedure, which is covered by the public health care), that's all.

Next year, when I turn 65, I'll not be eligible even for that, even for teeth removal for free, which is a real nightmare.


DECEMBER 2019


4 Dec. 2019

Only on 4-th of December, 2019, I could see a urologist at Royal Victoria Hospital, Dr. N. Fahmy (the appointment was scheduled at 14:00, room DT3310).


First, I came to the department (clinic) at the lobby level, took a number, and then presented myself to the medical secretary, as a patient, who has an appointment today, at 14:00. (I was there at 13:55).


She responded unfriendly, with an offensive tone, saying that my hospital card has expired, and I must replace it (she did not explain, how and where to go), and also - that I came to a wrong clinic, and must go upstairs.


When I approached the clinic at the 2-nd level, I was stopped by 2 aged women in blue semi-uniform (probably, volunteers), who stopped me, and demanded to show my hospital card, and then told me that I must replace it before being granted an access to the services. When I asked them where is the urology department, they said that I must go up 1 level.


After getting a replaced hospital card, I went to the 3-rd level, but was told that urology is not there, and that I must go 1 level down.


Dr. Fahmy has sabotaged the medical exam: he did not question me; did not examine me; did not assessed my problems; and denied me any follow ups. He refused me as his patient, in spite of my statement that - actually - I have no urologist in Montreal.


I understood that Dr. Morris, using his authority, actually blocked me an access to urological care.


CHAPTER 6


2020


JANUARY, 2020.


6 Jan 2020, Monday

Today the governmental tortures (as I call the denial of dental services for people of low income in Canada) continued. If I could afford the normal dental services, or the dental care was covered by a public health care: I could just repair 2 last left untreated teeth, without the need to remove them. However, an only option to solve the problem was an extraction surgery.


So, I had an appointment (scheduled at 13.00) with Dr. Roi - the dentist, who now is working at 4941 Welington (SOS Sourire Clinique; tel. 514-544-4441).


This operation has also passed with great difficulties, lasted more than 1 and a half hours, and required 2 gum cuts and crumbling the teeth into pieces.


After my very bad experience at 3 different places, there is a grounded suspicion that I have enormously firm (strong) teeth.


In 2 hours after this surgery of the left lower teeth removal (6 January, 2020) I was affected by an enormous pain:

1) left side of the head;

2) left ear (also blocked 1 h. after the surgery);

3) lymph node (also swollen, harden);

4) left side of the jaw.


5 p.m.: difficult to swallow; problems with respiration.

7 p.m.: my wife called Info-Sante; 1,5 h. waiting: no response.

4. 8 p.m.: she called S.O.S. Sourire: no dentist was there; I was given an appointment for 7/1/2020 (10:30).

5. 8:15 p.m.: I took Novo-Profen (3 pills left, already expired); great relief in 30 min; took Vitamin C; applied warm scarf; etc.


7 Jan 2020, Tuesday

8:40 a.m.: no Novo-Profen left; the situation has worsened again (lymph node more painful; the cheek more swollen; sharp pain (like an electric shock), when even a liquid like water gets on the left side; a strip of soft tissue (the tissue with stitches?) hanging between the teeth; etc.).

10:30: On my request to issue Azithromycin and Novo-Profen, Dr. P. Aziz prescribed only Azithromycin.

13:00. I took 2 pills of Azithromycin, but the situation began worsening again, in spite of rinsing with soda+salt, applying warm scarf, etc., etc., etc.


The whole day and 2 sleepless nights the pain was still increasing (Tylenol did not help); the area of painful jaw widening; aching when swallowing - more tormenting; opening the mouth more painful; and the lymph node hurting more.


8 Jan 2020, Wednesday

Pain of the left skull (behind the left ear) and pain of the left ear returned.


I detected now the stitches between the 2-nd & 3-rd molars.


The abscess and hardening in the cheek corresponds to this exactly area.


For me, a dilettante, this looks weird: why the stitches not in the gum that covers the extracted wisdom tooth, but 1-2 teeth far away to the center.


The area of pain in the lower dental arch have been widened, in spite of antibiotic.


Most of the pain was now coming not from the site of operation (complicated wisdom tooth extraction with the surgical cuts and many stitched), but from this abscess from the 2-nd molar to the canine, and from the soft tissue behind and higher than the operation site (where 2 dental arched are connected, including retromolar pod; maxillary tiberosity; anterior pillar; etc.): i.e. from the soft and hard parts of the palate & the throat.


Around 11:38, I called S.O.S. Sourire, and described the situation to Dr. Roi, who escaped from his obligation to see me and examine the problem physically, and prescribed the Novo-Profen and Codeine instead. He faxed it to the farmacy.


I don't blame Dr. Roi, because I suspect that the sadistic System just did not leave him a choice.


In spite of the pain and not being well, I went to the pharmacy to obtain medications. However, I could not afford buying Codeine.


8 Jan 2020, Thursday

I discovered that massaging and applying a tender pressure to the abscess makes it softer and smaller, which means that there is an accumulating infiltrate inside there.


I also discovered that the stitches are present between the 2-nd and 3-rd molder, and between the 2-nd and 3-rd molder: 2 teeth after the surgery site.


What Dr. Roi and his Asiatic partner-assistant (who have an impression of more than an assistant) sewed up there? A friend, who used to work as a dentist's assistant in his native Latin American country (and whom I described my torments), joked that the doctors have inserted a tracing device (location indicator (to enable police and special services to know my location), or a transmitter, blue ray AND a tapping device (that sends the audio to a remote receiver), or something similar.


Never before dentists operated from the right and then from the left (Dr. Roi stood up - and went to the left side (on my left side) in the middle of the surgery).


25 Jul 2019, Thursday

At 10.10 I supposed to see Dr. Viviott, but her secretary transferred the appointment to January 28, 11.30.


27 Jan 2020, Monday

Because of the ongoing dental infection and dental surgery complications, I had to see Dr. Roi again (by schedule - at 11.00).


28 Jan 2020, Tuesday

The appointment with Dr. Viviott (Point-Claire, 955 St.-Jean boul. (near boul. Brunswick, Tel.: 461-3929) was scheduled at 11.30. Her secretary (a very compassionate and good women) wanted to transfer my file to NDG Clinic - Tel. 514-228-8889 - but something went wrong. Only much later I understood what's the matter, and why Dr. Viviott and her secretary tried to transfer my file.


Dr. Viviott has refused to remove problematic lesions; told that the less expensive operation on the back will cost around 100 dollars.


FEBRUARY 2020


6 Feb 2020 (Thursday)

13:30 (1:30 p.m.) - Ultrasound at Montreal General Hospital was clearly summarized to downplay the worrisome aggravating changes, which reverse the results of 2 surgeries [see "The Urological Drama"]


The denial of the urological care in this situation must be regarded as a serious medical crime.


15-16 Feb. 2020

Having no doubts that Dr. Lesk is a good man and an excellent specialist (just not as brave as Dr. Saleh in opposing the System's cruelty), I am - at the same time - sure that the medical authorities have blocked (to him) all most important opportunities to provide for me the most efficient ophthalmological care.


Being sure that Dr. Lesk, at least, will not inflict any harm to me, and that he is an ethically sane person, I am, at the same time, morally distressed by his attempts to cover up the government - by downplaying the gravity of my vision's problems.


19 Feb. 2020, Wednesday

Another tragedy is my hearing drastic degeneration, which is a "capital punishment" for creativity of musicians like me.


I explain why my hearing has degraded in a special part called "Who Destroyed My Vision and Hearing". But during a period, when my hearing still could be restored, doctors and the medical system have sabotaged all medical measures, which could help.


At 15:00, I had another (the 2-nd) Audiology test at Royal Victoria Hospital at room E4.02.


This test has confirmed the further worsening, but I was denied even the hearing aid, not speaking about restoring my hearing, which was still possible.


After this procedure I went to SOS-Sourire dental clinic, where I left the "prestation" from Welfare for dental partial prosthesis. However, I knew that it is impossible for me to wear the dentures, because of the horrific multiple traumas, which dentists inflicted, including the broken skull. As later was confirmed, no dentures can fit me due to this reason.


Both solutions - surgery for repairing the skull and alveolar bones' injuries, or teeth full and adequate treatment to prevent further teeth loss - are not available for me because of inhuman outraged cost of dental services in Canada.


20 Feb. 2020

I had another appointment at Ophthalmology Department at Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital: follow-up after Emergency. (See the details in: "Who Destroyed My Vision and Hearing").


21 Feb. 2020 (Friday)

At 8.30 - I visited my family doctor (Dr. Rohan) about the lesion on my back.


He was terrified by the view of bleeding and badly looking huge lesion, and indignant that Dr. Viviott refused to remove this lesion, demanding 100 dollars for this procedure.


But especially he was revolted that Dr. Viviott did not tell me where to go, and what to do, if I cannot pay 100 dollars.


However (running forward), later I found out that Dr. Viviott was a hostage of clinic's new administration and clinic's privatization by humans-monsters.


So, Dr. Rohan arranged an appointment for me with Dr. Wang for Feb. 26.


25 Feb. 2020, Tue.

As I already mentioned (see: 29 Oct. 2019) severe complications after a flu, which have affected my hearing; and the Metro-Medic clinic sent me to another otolaryngologist in a very far away ORL clinic, located at 2155 rue St. Luis, ville St.-Laurent (bus 128) (tel.: 514-312-9952; fax: 514-744-8314. 2155; contact@lscentremedical.com).


But, as I discovered later, this clinic appeared to be one of the innumerous bogus-public clinics, which receive public funds, but actually works as a private clinic, treating patients only for money. Such clinics are converted into private sector institutions (just nominally - deceptively - keeping the status of "public" medical facilities), but, actually, are "reconfigured" not for medical help, but just for money extortion.


26 June 2020

Dr. Gdalewicz (Gdalevitch) supposed to call me at 13:30, but she did not call, sabotaging the appointment.


However, there was an anonymous telephone call more then 1,5 hours after the scheduled time of rendezvous.


If it was Dr. Gdalewicz: then she violated the norms, because a call after almost 2 hours is inacceptable, and, besides, she disconnected so quickly (too early) that I had no time to pick up the receiver (she did not wait for the answering machine, and even did not leave me time to jump to the phone). Because I don't have a mobile phone, but used an old "conventional" apparatus, I not supposed to answer instantly. By all the norms, Dr. Gdalevitch was obliged to hold on unless 7-10 seconds - before disconnecting.


[See the whole saga of Dr. Gdalewicz's negligence in "The Mistreatment of my Injuries".]


29 June 2020

At 9:15, I had another appointment with Dr. Roi, the dentist.


He prepared the dentures knowing that I'll not be able to use them anyways.


I was taken by car (my wife was driving) to the dentist - 8:50 - 9:15.


At the key points we met the police car 16-01, and 3 security cars, plus 3 "Chicken" cars - 12 times!


From the dentist I came home walking - 9:30 - 9:52.


At key points and on my way - I was all the time followed by the same police car 16-01. Besides, I saw also a "munic" car PNG-3202 (?) - 6 times; 2 security cars; and "munic" red mini-track - 4 times.


29 June 2020

At 14:00, came a call from Dr. Poliquin. He arranged repeated exams, which later were also sabotaged by the hospital administration as well.


---------


In June 2020, I composed two letters: one to the Federal Canadian Minister of Health; and another one to Quebec Minister of Health, concerning my tremendous Dental Ordeal (see below):


--------------------


To the Federal Minister:


To Quebec Minister:


Ministère de la Santé et des Services sociaux

Le Ministre, Monsieur Christian Dubé

2021, avenue Union

Bureau 10.051

Montréal (Québec) H3A 2S9

Téléphone : 514 873-3700

Télécopieur : 514 873-7488

ministre@msss.gouv.qc.ca

Christian.Dube.LAPR@assnat.qc.ca

________________________


CC:

Monsieur Lionel Carmant - Ministre délégué à la Santé et aux Services sociaux

ministre.delegue@msss.gouv.qc.ca

Lionel.Carmant.TAIL@assnat.qc.ca


Madame Marguerite Blais - Ministre responsable des Aînés et des Proches aidants

ministre.responsable@msss.gouv.qc.ca

marguerite.blais.prev@assnat.qc.ca


Cher Ministre de la Santé !


En raison de ma situation socioéconomique et l"absence de couverture gouvernementale, un événement traumatique d"une dent (un morceau de métal dans la nourriture) a mené à une réaction en chaîne de dégradation d"une dent en santé. Des soins complets auraient facilement pu prévenir des carries des autres dents, résultant de cette chaîne. Cependant, je n"avais pas de choix que de laisser pourrir mes dents, pour ensuite les faire arracher (il ne me reste que quelques-unes intactes). Bien pire : chaque extraction de dent s"est avérée une épreuve avec des complications parfois s"étirant sur des mois entiers, incluant des dommages à la mâchoire et des souffrances significatives.


Si j"avais eu accès aux traitements adéquats, il n"aurait pas été nécessaire d"extraire les dents.


Je ne sais pas pourquoi TOUTES mes extractions dentaires se transforment en cauchemar, et pourquoi la PLUPART requièrent des chirurgies dentaires complexes avec des coupures et des points de suture.


Sans insinuer une négligence ou des endommagements délibérés de la part des dentistes, je peux simplement suggérer que j"ai une condition dentaire particulière (anatomique ou autre), qui complique toute extraction dentaire, et que le Système ne travaille pas en ma faveur.


Si les extractions avaient été évitées, je n"aurais pas eu à prendre des antibiotiques, des antiinflammatoires et des anti-douleurs, causant des difficultés à mastiquer normalement, des infections post-chirurgicales et d"autres difficultés en lien avec un manque de soins dentaires adéquats ; engendrant un dommage possible à mes oreilles et au nasopharynx, à mon apparence physique faciale, à mes reins, foi, et organes gastrointestinaux, cardiovasculaires et autres.


Actuellement, après l"extraction de sept dents (et absence de pont dentaire), je souffre de difficultés de prononciation, rendant ma vie, déjà compliquée par une perte de l"audition et une détérioration de la vision (également causées par la cruauté du Système), encore plus compliquée.


Dans le fichier joint, je décris quelques complications dentaires post-chirurgicales, ainsi que

les souffrances atroces occasionnées.


Je demande l"accès aux soins dentaires complets et inconditionnels, incluant un traitement de canal, une ou deux couronnes dentaires, un pont dentaire, etc., ainsi que l"accès aux professionnels experts et expérimentés pouvant répondre aux problèmes de ma condition dentaire complexe.


Devant l"information que je fournis dans le fichier joint, un refus de ma demande sera considéré comme un dommage volontaire envers ma santé et une exposition consciente aux tortures.


Sincèrement votre,

Lev Gunin.


N.B. De plus en plus de cliniques refusent d"effectuer des extractions dentaires gratuitement.

______

Ci-joint, se trouve une sélection de deux épisodes de complication à la suite d"extractions dentaires.


1. Une extraction de deux dents du côté droit dans le haut, le vendredi, 22 juillet 2016, s"est transformée en cauchemar. L"opération en soi fut anormalement douloureuse et a duré deux heures et demie. La douleur m"a presque rendu inconscient. Cinq jours après la chirurgie, j"étais incapable de manger et arrivais à peine à boire, puisque ma bouche ne s"ouvrait pas adéquatement. Un mois plus tard, les points n"étaient toujours pas fondus. Le vendredi, 29 juillet 2016, mes gencives déformées par la chirurgie étaient toujours extrêmement douloureuses et se sont inflammées. Mes joues ont commencé à se creuser et, avec le temps, des déformations cosmétiques se sont développées en raison de l"extraction de ces deux dents. Les 3 et 16 août 2016, le chirurgien m"a prescrit du Azithromycin (que j"ai dû payer 17 $ CAD, bien entendu). Il a refusé d"effectuer un scan qui confirmerait ou infirmerait des dommages possibles des os alvéolaires de la mâchoire. Il a également refusé de mentionner les complications, l"ablation partielle de la gencive et la gravité de l"opération dans sa lettre. La gencive n"a jamais guéri, et la douleur ainsi que d"autres problèmes sérieux ont persisté jusqu"en janvier 2017.

2. À la suite du mauvais traitement à la clinique spécialisée de chirurgie dentaire, j"ai décidé de demander à mon dentiste habituel d"extraire deux dents suivantes. Le jeudi, 12 avril 2018, il a procédé à l"extraction de deux dents du côté droit dans le bas de la bouche. Cette opération est également devenue un cauchemar. Une fracture des os alvéolaires, un endommagement de l"os maxillaire de la mâchoire, et d"autres complications s"en sont ensuivies. J"ai énormément souffert cinq mois durant, mes gencives étaient inflammées et saignaient à répétition, ma bouche ne s"ouvrait pas adéquatement (cette distorsion est restée), j"ai dû prendre des antibiotiques plusieurs fois, etc.


À la demande, je peux fournir de plus amples descriptions et des documents médicaux.


Au total, j"ai souffert de sept complications horribles. Ce n"est pas assez?

Meilleures salutations,

Lev Gunin


BELOW IS MY ENGLISH VERSION OF THE LETTER TO THE FEDERAL

MINISTER OF HEALTH, AND THE RESPONSE FROM THE FEDERAL MINISTRY.


Dear Honorable Minister of Health!


Because of my socioeconomic situation and governmental insurance policy of non-coverage, a traumatic event with 1 tooth (a piece of metal in the food) led to a chain reaction of healthy teeth decay. Each next tooth in the chain could be easily saved, preventing (with a full dental care) the caries. Yet, I had no choice, but to leave the teeth to rot, and then to extract them (few: almost not touched by rotting). Even worse that each tooth removal is been turning into an ordeal with wide and prolonged (sometimes: for months) complications, jaw damage, and significant suffering, equal to tortures.


Removing the teeth would be not necessary with an access to proper and full treatment.


I don"t know, why ALL of the extractions become a nightmare, and why MOST of them required a complicated dental surgery with a surgical cut and stitches.


Rejecting insinuations about a deliberate damage or mass dentists" negligence, I can only suggest that I have a special dental condition (anatomic or other), which complicates any teeth removals, and that the System is not working in favor for me.


Unnecessary (if the extractions were avoided) courses of antibiotics, anti-inflammatory, and pain killers; impossibility to chew food normally; systemic post-surgical infections; and other factors (linked to the lack of an adequate dental care), caused potential or actual damage to ears and nasopharynx, face cosmetic condition, kidney and liver, gastroenterological, cardiovascular, and other systems and organs. Now, after the removal of 7 teeth (and having no dental bridge), I am struggling with the defect of speech, which made my life, already complicated by the hearing loss and vision deterioration (also caused by System"s cruelty), even more miserable.


In the attachment below I describe some of the selected histories of post-dental-surgeries" complications, and the tremendous suffering, caused by them.


I am asking for an access to a complete and unconditional dental care (including the treatment of the canal, 1 or 2 crowns, dental bridge, etc.), and to advanced experienced professionals, matching my complicated dental condition.


Regarding information, provided above and in the Attachment, a refusal of my request must be considered as a deliberate damage to my health, and conscious exposure to tortures.


Yours truly,

Lev Gunin.

P.S. (Besides, more and more dental clinics or offices are denying an extraction for free.)

______

Attached description of 2 selected complications after teeth removals:


1. An extraction of 2 r. upper teeth on Friday, 22 July 2016, had turned into a nightmare. The

operation itself was unusually painful and lasted 2 and a half hours. All the time the pain almost

knocked me down into an unconscious state. 5 days after this surgery I could not eat and almost

did not drink, because could not open the mouth. The stitches were not dissolving around 1

month. Friday, 29 July 2016, the deformed by the surgery gum became extremely painful again,

and an inflammation has started there. The cheek starter to fall inside, and, with time, a cosmetic

defect has developed after these 2 teeth extraction. 3 and 16 Aug. 2016 the surgeon had issued

Azithromycin (I paid 17CD in cash for each course). He refused the CAD scan to prove or rule

out an eventual damage of the alveolar bones of the jaw. He also refused to mention

complications, gum"s partial removal, and the seriousness of the operation in his letter. The gum

has never recovered, and the pain and other serious problems have lasted till January, 2017.


2. After the mistreatment in the special dental surgery clinic I decided to remove next 2 teeth by

my permanent dentist. Thursday, 12 Apr. 2018, 2 r. lower teeth were removed by him. This

extraction turned into a nightmare, too. Fracture of the alveolar bones, damage to the r. maxillary

bones of the jaw, and other complications followed. I was badly suffering from pain 5 months;

the gum was inflamed and bleeding many times; I could not open my mouth normally (and the

distortion remained since then); I had to take several courses of antibiotics...


If needed, I can provide a more detailed description and medical documents.


Totally, I suffered from 7 horrible complications. Isn"t it enough?


With my best regards,

Lev Gunin.


______________


Here are their responses to my letter:


a) from the Federal Minister:


Inbox: dental health care (2 of 68) Personal Unseen


Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 15:49:18 +0000 [29/07/20 11:49:18 AM EDT]

From: SPB / DGPS (HC/SC) Canada

To: leog@total.net

Subject: dental health care


Thank you for your e-mail of June 3, 2020 concerning access to dental health care in Canada.

We are sorry to hear about your frustrating experience accessing dental care.


The Canada Health Act requires the provinces and territories to provide coverage to their eligible residents for medically necessary hospital, physician, and surgical-dental services performed in a hospital, where a hospital is required for the proper performance of the procedure (such as insured health services). In addition to insured health services, the provinces and territories also provide a wide range of other services, such as coverage for dental services provided outside of a hospital, at their discretion and on their own terms and conditions. These services are often targeted to specific population groups (e.g., seniors, children, and those receiving social assistance), with levels of funding and scope varying from one province or territory to another.


However, there is no requirement for any government to provide further dental care at this time.


You may appreciate that the most recent Minister of Health Mandate Letter and the Speech from the Throne both committed to support Parliament in studying the possibility of national dental care.


In February 2020, the House of Commons Standing Committee on Health agreed to undertake a study on the development of a national dental care program. We value your comments as the Government of Canada works to fulfill this commitment.


As the provinces and territories are responsible for the design, delivery, and management of health care in their jurisdictions, you may also wish to also share your views with your provincial/territorial Minister of Health. They may be in a better position to address some of your concerns and offer more specific information about dental care programs in your region.


Additionally, you may wish to contact your local public health authority regarding any

available dental care supports or low-cost clinics. You may also find it useful to visit the

Canadian Association of Public Health Dentistry's website as it lists government dental programs

by region: http://www.caphd.ca/programs-and-resources/government-dental-programs


It is important to hear about the challenges Canadians are facing, such as those described in

your e-mail. Again, we are sorry to hear about your experience and sincerely wish you well.

Thank you for taking the time to share your views.

Yours sincerely,

Strategic Policy Branch

Health Canada


-------


Inbox: RE: Honorable Minister of Health (1 of 92)


Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2020 22:13:15 +0000 [06:13:15 PM EDT]

From: ministresc, Minister / Ministre hcminister (HC/SC)


To: leog@total.net

Subject: RE: Honorable Minister of Health


On behalf of the Honourable Patty Hajdu, Minister of Health, thank you for taking the time to write.


Please be assured that your correspondence is being carefully reviewed.


The Minister greatly appreciates receiving the views of Canadians on matters that are important to them.


Again, thank you for writing.

Executive Correspondence Division


*******************************************


Au nom de l"honorable Patty Hajdu, ministre de la Santé, merci d"avoir pris le temps d"écrire.


Sachez que votre correspondance sera examinée attentivement.


La ministre est très sensible aux points de vue des Canadiennes et des Canadiens sur les questions qui leur tiennent à cœur.


Encore une fois, merci d"avoir écrit.


Division de la correspondance de la haute gestion.


_____________


b) from Quebec's Minister:


(see below)


It is impossible to characterize both replies otherwise than cynically and overtly inhuman (and, besides, possibly, hostile). Both responders have completely ignored the actual real facts (described in my appeal), refuging into general abstract phrase-mongering, and showing their shocking disdain to the suffering of small ordinary Canadian citizens. Both responders refused to give any assessment to the real facts of horrific medical violence, caused by the cruelty of the federal and provincial medical policy, and, on the contrary, concentrated on the deceiving and misleading governmental "programs", which are, in reality, nothing else but a camouflage of the real inaccessibility of the dental care, or these "programs" simply don't work (like mine bogus-prostheses).

Theoretically, I understand that - after Jean Chretien - Canada lost its status - becoming a third-rate state - just a dominion of foreign powers, which give orders and milk her, robbing and using her as a bedding, and all these ministerial Ladies and Gentlemen decide nothing, and weight nothing, having no free hands to distribute resources. They sit on foreign states' wages, doing what they are told to do.

However, they had to understand that my case is exceptional - and requires a certain exclusion, with an exclusive attention.

I contacted 3 schools mentioned by the ministerial letter (mentioning other schools - far away from Montreal - was a mockery, or an extraordinary indifference of a person, who lives on the Lune, not in our ill-starred world!): in Montreal, in Longueuil, and in Terrebonne, but they announced such incredibly high prices turned to be even higher than in normal private dental offices. They said that I must pay even for evaluation and for a treatment plan: the procedures, which are covered by the RAMQ card even in the private dental offices! Thus, a patient must pay thousands of dollars just to enable someone inexperience to have training on him! Hence, for playing a role of a guinea-pig every respected human being deserve to be paid for the risk!

I don't know - who was speaking to me on the phone, but I can guess that - maybe - they were just scaring me away from the college's dental clinic for different reasons: possibly, to discourage a potential victim of medical violence, or, on contrary, because they provide their discounted services only "on the quiet" - offering an adequate treatment under professor's supervision (or by the professor) ONLY for friends, relatives, or as a barter exchange.


JULY 2020


11 July 2020 (Saturday)

Between 14:00 - 15:00, I was at home with the piano tuner.


13 July 2020, Monday

After my written letter to Verdun Hospital's administration, in which I explained that could not get along with Dr. Gdalevitch, and demanded another orthopedic specialist, I, finally, got an appointment (at 9:20) - with Dr. Massea - an orthopedic specialist.


[See the whole saga of Dr. Gdalewicz's neglect in "The Mistreatment of my Injuries".]


22 Jul 2020, Wednesday

The appointment with Dr. Roi (the dentist), scheduled at 7:30, was cancelled because the

dentures allowance was not ready yet.


27 Jul 2020

In the end of July, I urgently needed a blood-urine test, and, having 4 requisition from 4 different doctors, has chosen my family doctor's prescription, which I used for passing lab tests.


However, my access to medical lab tests was completely blocked by hospitals.


Using Covid measures and restrictions as a pretext, two hospitals motivated the refusal "by Covid" (!). Other hospitals just blocked me an access to the tests, without even caring to explain - why.


AUGUST 2020


12 August 2020

My family doctor administrated not only the lab tests, but also an MRI exam, scheduled at 12:30 at St.-Mary's Hospital, which objective was to check the gravity of the uterus' calcification.


This exam required the blood test of the strum creatinine.


20 Aug. 2020

My chronicle can make an impression that in the 2-nd half of 2019 and in 2020 I had too many medical appointments, which, allegedly, contradict the claims about the degradation of medical help in Canada and the sadistic tendency in health care. However, maybe even 1 third of all appointment were cancelled completely, or rescheduled for another day.


Other appointments were cancelled because some of my untreated or mistreated health problems became an obstacle not allowing me to visit a doctor.


Here I indicated not all cancelled appointments, but just - selectively - some of them.


And the appointment with Dr. Roi, the dentist (13.10), was first cancelled by me as well - because I was suddenly given an appointment with Dr. Lesk at the same time.


Only when I called around 11 a.m. 19 Aug. 2020, it was changed to 20:30, the same day (20 Aug. 2020).


At 13:00 I had to appear in Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital, to see Dr. Lesk.


(More details are given in another book of this chronicle - "Who Destroyed my Vision and Hearing".)


Considering the need of so many medical appointment, it is the Medical System itself (so-called "health care"), which provoked the overwhelming majority of them.


Taking, for example, into consideration the recurrent (in spite of 2 surgeries) urological problems and recurrent UT infections; new arthritis attacks; cardiovascular problems; and some other health problems, I came to a conclusion that they all are partially or completely related to untreated dental cavities and other dental problems. Government's refusal to cover dental care for low-income individuals and families (who cannot afford dental services) is emptying the moneybox resources of public health care faster than a fully covered public dental plan.


Hundreds of urgently needed surgeries are delayed because of the untreated dental problems in patients, whose impossibility to use dental care is threatening by severe complications or death in case of transplantation surgeries, cardiovascular surgical procedures, or a number of other surgical operations. Untreated dental problems are posing a risk to life of patients on chemotherapy, and some other categories of patients.


From my conversations with people, from my personal experience, and from the study of information available in newspapers, TV and radio channels, I came to a conclusion that the access to dental care is cut off from 60-70 percent of Quebec population. This vicious inhuman policy doesn't reflect an austerity (of the state resources), doesn't serves national interests: it serves only a very small clique of medical gangsters, who's profiting from the national tragedy, and to that part of the ruling elite, which love the pleasure to trump on people, to enjoy the power of domination, and to keep the unprivileged people "under the floor".


The government policy, which reflects such savage aggressive profit-making on top of mass atrocities of the vulnerable population, is antinational, and matches a hidden motto of modern sinister repressive class: "not to heal, but to kill".


Inhuman advocates of this savage domination of the moral freaks will say that, at least, the teeth removal is available in most of the cases, and for almost all citizens, even if low-income patients are forced to extract semi-healthy and healthy teeth, but my case refutes such an allegation. [In reality, the option of teeth removal is also not free for seniors after 65, who must pay even to teeth removal procedure by "pocket" money!] Indeed, trying to get rid of the additional sources of infection, I resorted to an utmost step: to remove all teeth, together with the healthy teeth, and to have dental prostheses. However, the discrimination of unprivileged patients, and some other inequality factors instigated an even bigger problem: my jaw was damaged, the alveolar bones - broken, cosmetic defect provoked, my diction and even hearing affected, and no dentures will fit into my mouth in case if I lose the rest of my teeth.


It must be also taken into consideration that the dental surgeries "for beggars" have subjected me to such level of tortures (because of the damage to jaw and small bones, infections, and other severe complications, and - then - because of dentists' refusal to render further help connected to these complications) - that now I try to avoid any new teeth removal for any cost.


Now I am forced to delay teeth extraction as long as possible, regardless of the cumulative effect to body's inflammation processes, triggering UTI's, arthritis, cardiovascular problems, danger of oral lesions, and so on.


26 Aug. 2020

Meanwhile, I was receiving the physiotherapy at Verdun Hospital, but now - more and more often - the appointments were canceled, and the dates were changed to later dates.


The same happened with the appointment at 8.00, which was changed to 1 Sept. 2020 - 8.00.


21 Sept. 2020, Monday

Today, I came at 15:00 to SOS Sourire dental clinic for checking the prostheses.


I am not sure that it was Dr. Roi (because of the mask and antiviral plastic protection), but, I think, it was him.


He told me not to press to the dentures hard, because this is just a model, and it is fragile. I asked how can I know then if the dentures are fitting?


He gave no respond.


I also told him that the dentures did not allow me to speak, but he assured me that this is because they are just a model, and when I'll put the real dentures, it will be different.


He gave me a mirror, and asked if I am satisfied and if the color is similar to my own teeth.


I responded that my eyes were injured, and at the present moment I am not able to distinguish properly between the colors, and that this mirror is not corresponding to my vision.


I said that only another person (my wife or daughters) could see all the details.


I saw that the lower dentures seemed to be more less OK, but the upper dentures have a curved ark, with 2 artificial teeth on the right are sticking out. However, I said nothing to Dr. Roi, because all my previous concerns were just bounced out by him.


When I was ready to leave, he suddenly said that I MUST sign a document, which was presented in such a way as if signing this document was conditional for getting the dentures - when they are complete.


In other words, it was staged so that aimed to bring to my knowledge that without signing this paper I not getting the dentures.


When he gave me this paper to sign, he did not read it to me, but only said that it is a consent for having the dentures done, and, when I did an attempt to read it myself carefully, he has started to speak and assure that this is "of no importance", and "just a formality", disturbing my concentration, and also began to move the paper, so, that I was not able to finish reading, especially having difficulty with my vision as well and having no glasses. Because I am an aged person, who survived a number of accidents, injuries, surgeries, and health issues, I am vulnerable to the pressure, and I signed this paper, without having sustained the pressure put upon me.


Here (below) is the test of this document:


"SOS Sourire Verdun

4941 Wellington Street

Verdun

H4G 1X8

Phone: 514-544-4441

verdun@sossourire.com


Date: 21-09-2020


Acceptation de l'esthétique prothétique

Moi, Lev Gunin J_, se déclare satisfait(e) de

la couleur des dents, de ta forme des dents et de l'alignement

des dents de la prothèse : P_

que Dr (e) : Roi

va mettre en bouche te : 21-09-2020


Dans l'éventualité ou i) y a un problème esthétique, je m'engage à avertir mon dentiste traitant ? l'essayage, avant que ta prothèse soit fixée ou coté. Si après a mise en bouche, i! devait y avoir des modifications esthétiques, ceux-ci seront effectués ? mes frais.


Signature patient(e)


Acceptance of prosthetic aesthetics


I, the undersigned, _ hereby declare myself satisfied with

the color, shape and alignment of the prosthetic

teeth that Dr. __ will install on:


In the event of any dissatisfaction regarding the aesthetics of my prosthetics, I hereby accept that it is my responsibility to inform the treating dentist at the time of fitting, before the prosthetics are fixed or bonded. Furthermore, I understand that any aesthetic changes required after the installation of the prosthetics are at my own expense.


Signature of patient

Signature of dentist"


This event revealed one of the most sinister (or even horrific) secrets of the Canadian health-care system.


I am sure that Dr. Roi is a compassionate person, and a good doctor and man.


And if SUCH a man commits such an obviously unethical act: there is something really appalling behind it.


From this phenomenon - to an obligation to kill a patient if the government will need it: is only one small step.


When good people are somehow forced to commit unethical acts, it sends a very dreadful feeling that we live in some wild medieval epoch of bloody tortures and massive slain of people without any moral consideration. Only during the most loathsome dark eras good people were left no chances but to comply with monsters' orders.


When - once - Dr. Roi asked me if I had a surgery on the right side, including the surgery on the gum, I told that I don't remember, because did not understand right away about what area he is talking. Then he said that it, certainly, was an optical flare in the computer.


If he did not care about the collective cover-up and mutual protection of the dentists' order, he had a duty to tell me about the damage, which other dentists did to my dental apparatus before him. But, if I did not explain anything myself, he preferred to call it "an optical flare in the computer".


When - later- I told him that the alveolar bones and the jaw were damaged during the teeth removal, combined - in the case of the upper jaw - with a surgery on the gum: he started underplaying the damage, saying that the jaw abnormal position of the right side can be partially compensated by special exercises, without making any comments about the damage itself.


Dr. Roi was perfectly realizing that no dentures could fit and be useful for me because of the damage to the jaw and to the alveolar bones, and he knew in advance that I'll not be able to weary the dentures. Only some special dental prostheses - MAY BE - could resolve this problem, but such prostheses can cost up to 10 thousand dollars, and, still, there are no warranty that they will fit considering all the defects, inflicted by the dentists in the past. Of course, I don't have not just 10 thousand CD, but even 200-400 dollars, and the government would never authorize for me dentures more expensive than the cheapest and the most primitive ones.


Why - then - I started this procedure, in the first place? Why I had to waste the public money, if I doubted that ANY dentures could fit me with the jaw and alveolar bones' defects?


Simply because Dr. Roi has managed to convince me somehow that it is possible to manufacture dental prostheses taking into consideration all the measurements and my individual features, and I started to believe in his lie.


However, 8 or 11 months later I came into conclusion that Dr. Roi was just lying to himself and was lying to me that the most primitive and standard dentures would be wearable in my mouth.


30 Sept. 2020, Monday

Dr. Roi at SOS Sourire (15:50) was again checking the prostheses.


I told Dr. Roi that it is impossible to use the dental prostheses - because they don't fit: 1) it is very difficult to put them on; they detach as soon as I start to speak; 2) when I eat - the food gets under the prostheses, and they immediately detach; 3) the prostheses leave no space inside my mouth, occupying so much space that there is no space where to put the tongue, and, consequently, I cannot speak normally.


My last statement should sound as an alarm for Dr. Roi, whose medical duty was to realize that something is not OK with patient's palate - that there is a possible neo-growth. However, he just ignored it, pretending that did not hear anything worth his attention.


Then I hinted that, besides everything that I already mentioned, I feel some bumpy area on the palate, which may pose an additional obstacle for the prostheses.


Maybe, Dr. Roi did not understand my hint, because he has ignored even THIS almost direct report on neoplasm. Maybe, I not really understood his reply correctly, because I interpreted his reaction as if he was showing (in a pointed manner) by intonation, accents, and caesuras - that he interprets my last words not as a serious declaration, but as a pretext to reject the dentures. However, no sane person will believe that this very professional and adequate doctor refused to examine my palate just because he did not trust the sincerity of his patient's complaint. A suspicion of neoplasm is too grave to be ignored if even there is a little doubt in patient's statement, and an exam of the area of concern takes just few seconds.


Running forward: on 18 April 2023, when I had another appointment with Dr. Roi, he examined the area of the "bumpy palate" and "un bosse" (as I told him), but said that he feels and sees "nothing". However, his duty was to refer me to an oral lesions specialist, because he is just an ordinary dentist, and, besides, an appropriate scan is needed, because without a special scan - it is impossible to judge about an absence or a presence of any oral lesion.


He reacted now in the same manner as he reacted to my claim that the dentures don't work for me.


Of course, Dr. Roi just PRETENDED to resort to a non-serious interpretation of his patient's words, but, in reality, he was very well aware of the uselessness of the dentures due to the traumas left by the previous dentists (injuries to maxillary tuberosity; alveolar bones; etc.), and, secondly, he, of course, did not doubt that there is really some swollen area of the palate. It is not easy guessing - why he ignored my complaints: because he, certainly, badly needed that the dental prostheses would be accepted, and because he nourished the hope that "this difficult patient" will go to another dentist - after such a serious deliberate negligent from his side; or because he did not see any (known to him) method to help me within the System, which is designed "not to heal, but to kill", knowing that I have no money for treatment.


In the beginning of October 2020, I run across an academic research on post-surgical dental traumas, which claimed that the traumas left by negligent dentists in their patients can provoke oral lesions ALMOST as chronic infections. It means that for discriminated, marginalized, and persecuted people (like me) the teeth extraction and dental infections pose almost an equal danger.


OCTOBER, 2020


5 Oct. 2020

I supposed to have another course of the physiotherapy at 8:00, but forgot and did not come in time, and then it was too late.


It is nothing surprising, because under the number of stressful situations (taking just the dental saga is enough!) it can happen with everyone.


25 or 26 of Oct. 2020

A piece of a metal was in one of the prunes in the sack of Kirkland Sunsweet pack.


It was as big as almost a flash memory stick, and sharp as knife...


Miraculously, I did not swallow it and did not cut my tongue, or gums, or cheeks. If I swallowed it - I would die, and if I would cut something inside my mouth, I could die from the blood loss.


This packet of prunes we bought at Costco.


Now, Costco was involved in several incidents: 1) with my emails and phone (September, 2015, when Primus Costco was temporarily our main provider); 2) when I was photographed with a bicycle in the store (23 Feb. 2013); 3) when I was illegally searched by Costco's employers; 4) and - now - with that prunes' sack.


NOVEMBER, 2020


3 Nov. 2020

I've experienced another stomach - low-intestines attack after eating kenua +.


After this, I stopped eating kenua.


5-6 Nov. 2020

Another glaucoma attack has shown all the vulnerability of my situation again.


25 Jul., 2022. Mon.

19.30 - Dr. Roi, the dentist.

He said that cannot replace or take away the useless dentures.

They are absolutely unfit for me.

When I told Dr. Roi that - with all the injuries, inflicted by my former dentists - I will not be able to wear any dental prosthesis, so, what shell I do, when I'll lose all teeth - not being able to eat?!

He said nothing.


----


On 29 Apr. 2023, I wrote and sent a letter to Dr. Roi:


Dear Dr. Roi!

First, let me express my appreciation for your human approach.


It looks like you sincerely tried to resolve my dental problems, but, because Canada is one of the most expensive countries in the world concerning the dental care, but - simultaneously - has one of the cruelest dental policies: you could not render a real help.


As I understand it - you, Dr. Roi, is just an ordinary dentist, working for clinics, which policy you don't control, and, thus, it is not in your power to contribute into dental justice.


However, if you are intended to continue your good deeds, please, devote your time for reading my message carefully, and, please, respond with a possible advice: if you have one.


It is important to stress that I consider myself as one of the most affected victims of the Federal and provincial dental policy in Quebec.


I believe that I have very good teeth, and could keep all of them till a very old age. Now, I have 7 teeth removed, which is not bad in my age even for people, who have financial resources to treat their dental problems. However, if I had money - I could save ALL my teeth, but, unfortunately, since 2004, I had no money for dental care (in 2005 - 2016, I practically, did not show up at dentists' offices because of that).


The chronic dental infection has provoked 2 oral lesions already since 2015. In 2016, I had a major gum surgery related to a cyst. (By the way: if dentists adequately and timely reacted to my reports about the cyst - such a wide gum operation would not be needed, and would not cause so many complications and my suffering during more than half a year).


To prevent similar outcomes (oral lesions), I started to extract almost healthy teeth (which could easily saved, if I had money for treatment), and had to remove other teeth because they decayed for the lack of treatment. However, the dentists fractured my jaw and a number of alveolar bones, which made ordinary dentures non-compatible with my injuries (not fitting), i.e. not a solution. I received no compensation; I was denied a Legal Aid lawyer.


2 authorities in dental care told me that I have "VERY DIFFICULT" (for extraction surgeries) teeth [that what they - literary - said], and that further teeth removals may result in more traumas, and even in palate's damage. An altruistic dental surgeon, who consulted me online, claimed that my existing maximary and other dental injuries (left by dental surgeries) may play a significant role in provoking new major injuries in case of further teeth removals.


I also came across a statement in the academic dental researches - that dental traumas, inflicted by dentists, play a role in provoking dental lesions (i.e. not only chronic dental infections (linked to untreated teeth).


Thus, because of the a) risks, connected to further teeth extractions; b) risks that further surgeries' complications may provoke oral lesions; c) no solution in case of ALL teeth removal, because NOW (after inflicted by dentists' injuries) I cannot wear dental prostheses; d) risks of further dental surgeries-related inevitable infections, which often trigger such complications as metastatic inflammation; cardiovascular disease; atherosclerosis; infective endocarditis; pneumonia; etc.; e) already huge damage of teeth removals to my hearing and vision; f) enormous suffering after each teeth extraction during 6-8 months, accompanied (always) by dental infection, risks of new courses of antibiotics; and g) anemia, which, possibly, developed in connection to the dental ordeal: forced me to stop further teeth removals.


A head CT-scan in 2013, already found (I quote) "A small retention cyst (...) in the left maxillary sinus and there is mild right mucosal thickening".


Chronic dental infection (or, to be straight: my socioeconomic status) and dental injuries after first teeth removals (by then) might contribute to this lesion.


Presently (April, 29, 2023), the oral lesions are worried me most of all.


Here is the short description:


1) a strip of "bumpy palate" (lesion) along the median palatine suture - left of this symmetrical line: from transverse palatine suture till the incisive suture; [see the image]

2) papula (sometimes disappears, then appears again) inside the upper left lip (upper labial mucosa) close to the symmetrical line; [due to my self-treatment, it now gone]

3) suspiciously bumpy relief of the upper left gum;

4) abrasive skin on the left side of the lower labial mucosa (on the border of the lower lip and cheek);

5) hypertrophy of the left side at the anterior hard palate (palate "wrinkles"), and around the lateral incisor.


Concerning other problems (caries; untreated root canals; etc.): you have the X-ray data, and aware of them without my report.


Now, I start listing my requests (see below), but don't interpret them as demands. If you can help: do something; if you're not able to provide help: just write me that you can't. This is the most important: to know what I can expect.


1. Please, refer me to a specialist, who can identify the nature of dental lesions, and has the capacity and adequate diagnostic tools for this. However, as I don't have money to pay for such an exam, a free solution must be found. THIS IS A MEDICAL NECESSITY, Sir.

When, during my appointment with you, Dr. Roi (on 30 Sep. 2020), I told you that it is impossible to use the dental prostheses - because they don't fit: a) it is very difficult to put them on; they detach as soon as I start to speak; b) when I eat - the food gets under the prostheses, and they immediately detach; c) the prostheses leave no space inside my mouth, occupying so much space that there is no space where to put the tongue, and, consequently, I cannot speak normally: my last statement should sound as an alarm, and you had to realize that something is not OK with patient's palate. However, instead of examining a possible palate's swelling, you blamed me, your patient, for my, alleged, "lack of skill" of wearing the prostheses.

Then I hinted that, besides everything that I already mentioned, I feel some bumpy area on the palate, which may pose an additional obstacle for the prostheses, but you, doctor, ignored my hint.

When, during my last appointment with you, Dr. Roi (on 18 Apr. 2023), I told you - now clearly and directly - that I have a palate lesion, you pretended, Dr. Roi, that you examined the area - and found "nothing", while you simply had to refer me to a specialist.


2. Concerning partial dental prostheses: I may receive money from sponsors, but - before speaking about the prostheses - all teeth must be freed from caries and other problems, all root canals treatment must be finished, and all oral lesions must be treated in advance. Presently, I have no money for such a treatment; thus, an only solution is to refer me to public dental care based on the medical necessity. And you proposed me partial prostheses for 2 thousands 500 dollars, Dr. Roi, without proposing ANY solution for TEETH treatment.


3. And because you don't have and did not have any real solution for me, Dr. Roi; and also because you convinced me that partial prostheses might be a possibility despite all traumas from teeth removals (through you knew in advance that deprivation of teeth and AP post-traumatic flaw - as well as loss of alveolar height - not only create cosmetic defect, but also complicate subsequent prosthetics of patients); and because you told (and forced) me to sign my approval of prostheses BEFORE even trying them (i.e. putting my signature as a pre-condition); and because you, Dr. Roi, used my public health care insurance (the RAMQ card) for covering the cost of absolutely useless for me "state" trash dentures: you wasted my time, Dr. Roi, taking away more than 2 years of potential search for alternative solutions, and, meanwhile, my teeth continued to decay, and oral lesion appeared because of this - your moral obligation is to help me finding A REAL SOLUTION.


4. If you still don't have time and possibility to help me in any way: then you must provide me with all dental X-rays images (from 18 Apr. 2023), because otherwise it comes out that you just extorted from me 180 Canadian dollars, and exposed me to unhealthy procedure for no goal and for no reasons, as you knew that - by X-rays - you'll not be able to repair my teeth. So, in that case (if you have no solutions for me) - please, prepare for me all X-rays images. This my single demand, NOT a request.


And, still, Dr. Roi, I consider you an ethical person, because I believe that you would never hurt your patients (physically) deliberately during the treatment procedure, and that you - at least - WANTED to find a solution for me, but you failed. This is the scariest part: when the post-democratic regimes force potentially moral people like you, Doctor, to go against your altruistic nature and against humanistic principles.


My best regards,

Lev GUNIN,

Saturday, 29 Apr. 2023.


* * *


So I was left with no solutions, but with serious injuries, inflicted by the dentists; with oral lesions (provoked by the dentists); and with complications (provoked by the dentists), which affected other organs and functions. I was denied a legal aid lawyer; I was denied my rights of a human being, being equaled to a beast; and I was denied a minimal human treatment from the Ministers of Health and Social Services.


________________


Lev Gunin


THE PUNITIVE HEALTH CARE

[HEALTH CARE AS A REPRESSIVE TOOL]


BOOK 7


CONCLUSIONS.


CONTENT


Conclusions 1.

Conclusions 2.

Conclusions 3.

Conclusions 4.


__________


* * *


The whole text of the chronological events and medical documents (under the name of "The Punitive Health Care - (Health Care as a Repressive Tool)" is available for examination only on the basis of the following contract between the author and the reader:


I (THE READER) GIVE MY CONSENT THAT, BY CLICKING CORRESPONDING LINKS AND ACCESSING THE TEXT OF "THE PUNITIVE HEALTH CARE", I AUTOMATICALLY AGREE TO THE FOLLOWING PRELIMINARY CONDITIONS [FOR READING]:


-- I am (at least) 18 years old.


1. I (the reader) is undertaking (commit myself) not to distribute the text of "The Punitive Health Care - (Health Care as a Repressive Tool)" - entirely, or in fragments; not to copy medical documents; and not to share the text and images without author' permission.


2. I (the reader) understand that the confidential information, which is contained in this text, cannot be used for any other [than the reading (extraneous; secondary)] purposes and needs, for any researches, essays, stories, etc.


3. I (the reader) commit myself not to sneer at open ticklish personal information (which sharing was induced by circumstances), not to savor any medical, physiological, or anatomic details, and not to use this text as a reason for mockery and persecution.


4. I (the reader) am warned by the author that, except for a number of obviously immoral (by definition) doctors' and medical staff's actions, other decisions and acts described in this "confession" are not subjected to hasty moral assessment because a) only experts can judge finally about their justification and fairness; b) explanations and vindications of other party are necessary. We also do not know to what degree the doctors were under an influence and direct power of police, Ministry of Immigration, and other enforcement agencies, political organizations, groups and persons - with their own ideological, economic, and propaganda interests, - and to what degree this influence impacted on their diagnostic conclusions and assessments of patient's state of health. Many of the documentary confirmed facts incontestably demonstrate that author's ideological stand (who's opposing to younger generation's transformation into zombie-biorobots with mobile phones on shoulders instead of heads; to electronic totalitarianism with its prison-like total video surveillance; and to the tyrannical political censorship) played nearly a major role in enraging the authorities and triggering the persecutions.


5. I (the reader) am warned that the author sees the main cause of the most dramatic (for him) events in the fact that the enforcement agencies and interested persons and groups managed to present him to the medical community as an individual incapable to evaluate his health condition objectively; as a health-consciousan (or hypochondriac); an extremist; a troublemaker; an individual obsessed with panic and alarm patterns; as a person, who is making unreal demands to the system of medical care - concerning his - allegedly - pseudo-maladies and exaggerated gravity of trivial indispositions. This smear campaign of defamation, scurrilous libel, and wicked calumny made impossible receiving an adequate medical care (and sometimes any medical help at all), and led to health undermining, numerous diseases, incidents, and unnecessary sufferings. Doctors also considered difficult to believe in continuous (not connected with each other) illnesses, with an interval of 4-7 days, sometimes rolling at the same time: as tsunami. They refused to believe in these sequences of illnesses' painful course, danger, and significance. This chronicle disproves such a prejudiced opinion, producing an incontestable evidence.


6. I (the reader) am informed that all negative remarks, characteristics, and facts' assessments belong only to the portrayal of criminal groups, extremists, and carriers of anti-humanistic, racist, and totalitarian ideology, but do not contain groundless generalizations and negative assessment of any country, ethnic group, or religion. The author is categorically against dismantling of any of the existing states, and against restrictions of the rights of religious congregations of any faith.


7. I (the reader) am informed that this edition partially presents the previous 2017 edition without any changes, and, thus, may not correspond to later view and opinions.


8. I (the English reader) am informed that some parts of the following English text of "The Punitive Health Care" - were translated from Polish, Russian, or French originals, and may contain primitive language, double interpretation, or puzzled meaning. Such confusing fragments should be compared with their originals in Polish and Russian languages (author's native languages) [2016-2017]; all controversial points must be resolved through such a comparison.


9. In the very last moment of this edition's make-up (April 2023), the author came across a description of so-called Havana-syndrome, and found same symptoms and complications, which he experienced when was attacked by an unknown remote weapon (3 Nov. 2005, 7 Jan. 2013, and 21 June 2016), and developed symptoms of post-microwave irradiation.


_________


CONCLUSIONS - 1


(November-December 2016 - June 2017).


I am forced to terminate now this chronicle - in spite of the fact that the epic of my struggle for life continues in not less dramatic circumstances.


Summarizing my sad experience, I would like to stress (first of all) that I met - among medical workers - incredibly good people, who saved me from big-big troubles, and whom I am deeply indebted to. Many conscious doctors did uncountable favors to me, which eased my suffering and restored - temporary and partially - the medical justice. If these innumerous acts of human approach and compassion will be taken out of the content, and presented separately as a proof that I was not mistreated in the medical system, but, on the contrary, enjoyed some sort of privileges (unlike ordinary patients): they could give an illusion of fairness and lawfulness. However, the golden deeds of the most ethical doctors, and their priceless help did not compensate and did not surpassed the damage, inflicted by other doctors and by the System, and did not repair the scars, which are left by their cruel colleagues.


Many of such best doctors offered their special help because independently (i.e. without my revelations) came to a conclusion that I am tortured by the government for my pacifistic humanitarian view of the world. [The governments less afraid of those, who promote violence, revolutions, and mutinies, because the whole system is based on violence and war. Talking about non-violence and piece, the governments simultaneously promote "just wars", "justified" interventions, and fed (like the ancient people feed devil Moloch) their industrial-military complex.] They were scared by the perspective of medical system's transformation into a repressive political instrument, which will replace political prisons and concentration camps. By offering their special support to a patient, who is suffering from political persecutions, they resisted such horrific changes.


However, even the most altruistic doctors could not significantly change my situation because of 2 specific taboos.


First, they must restrain themselves from any action, conclusion, prescription, written or verbal certification, requisition, or statement, which could question - directly or indirectly - the actions of their colleagues, and, in many occasions, a doctor is not able to provide a substantial medical aid to a patient without this.


Secondly, they are submitted to situations, when even the most ethical and human of them are obliged to commit unethical acts. This is the most frightening phenomenon of the punitive health care, because moral people are never forced to do immoral acts in the normal civilized societies. For example, I consider the radiologist, Dr. Browman, not only one of the best in his profession, but also an ethical and responsible person. And, still, in one situation, he downplayed the gravity of my problem (if I am not mistaken). Dr. Beatrice Wang is not only one of best in her domain, but she is also a good person, and, still, after 20 years, she began to charge me for medically necessary procedures, in contradiction to the law, which demands applying the public health care coverage for people with the lowest socioeconomic status (like me). Dr. Piche and Dr. Pushi, both good doctors and ethical people, did some unethical things, despite their moral nature and altruism.


There are a number of similar examples in my chronicle.


Of course, I pardoned all such people, and don't want to put forward accusations against them, especially because they did a lot of good for me.


Such examples point clearly that the punitive health care system is eating its victims alive regardless of the best conscious doctors' intervention.


Another important point: is that - within my experience - the level and the magnitude of the medical repressions used to change from time to time, outlining separated different periods, when the situation (my personal situation, or (in other cases) the general situation) was shifting to a better one, or to the worse, including a particular period after December 2016.


In general, medical repressions and doctors' crimes - temporarily (after the surgical operation in December, 2016): have sharply declined. But it did not stop some separate surges of their recurrence. (As example: the actions and behavior of doctor Sejean, who continued to scoff over me even more than before, against the background of all my attempts' failure to pass from him to another otolaryngologist).


Police surveillance (and not only police alone), and - sometimes - intimidation - continued, especially during my visits to medical institutions (as before). Unless without the former demonstrativeness, intensity and aggressive persistence.


I enjoyed only a temporary lull (if it is possible to call the continued depression, which, nevertheless, began to decline (having completely disappeared only in July, 2017, and, thus, having lasted the whole year) "calm") only in February - beginning of March, 2017, and then new accidents burst, which made my life even more uncomfortable.


These are, first, the cardiovascular problems, which were still ignored by doctors.


It was absolutely clear that neither the cardiogram, nor heart X-ray can show anything new (in comparison with that cardiogram in May 2016, which - for the first time - showed the "Preliminary wave succession", and then this pathology became steady and constant). Neither the reasons of the "Preliminary wave succession", nor the cause of heartaches, nor the problems with blood vessels, episodes of tachycardia (especially, at the moments of awakening, of taking a horizontal position, or standing up), and arrhythmias: were not established.


A referral to an echocardiogram was and is systematically refused, as well as so-called "stress test" (heart's work under physical load). I saw several doctors, but all of them refused it.


Only my family doctor, as in most of the cases, administrated not only the repeated cardiogram, but also offered one of possible diagnostic decisions, which I, however, had to refuse for a number of reasons. I did not ask him to administrate an echocardiogram, wishing not to put him before an ethical dilemma and threat of troubles.


I saw several doctors and requested to prescribe medications concerning slightly higher (than the norm) sugar in blood, motivating my request by risk of developing diabetes and cataract. But I was refused everywhere.


I still not received medical care in connection with the further development of arthritis. Though the approximate untwistings of the mechanism of rheumatic problems was already clear, all the same - I was persistently refused an appointment of anti-inflammatory, and only the new rheumatologist (to whom my family doctor directed me) prescribed Celebrex.


Urological problems, meanwhile, gradually disappeared - partially - after the last surgical operation. All functions have been restored - as was before the "mysterious" infection and the beginning of these problems in 2001 - at the same - former - level. But - from time to time - some symptoms, such as pain, sometimes appeared at depletion, groin pain on the right side, or in a crotch, etc.


In the first months 2017, I also saw my family doctor concerning the gastroenterological problems, impossibility to sit normally (the "ulceration" becoming wet dermatitis "in the middle", etc.), stomach and intestines pains, pancreas and hypochondrium. He sent me to X-ray. He also administrated the laboratory analyses.


While the attitude towards me from doctors and medical institutions suddenly improved, the manipulations with diagnostic procedures and analyses continued. So, the processing and reporting of ultrasound and X-ray results leave many questions during this period. That X-ray continued a chain of sabotage of exams' results - under a pretext of different formal excuses, as, for example, supposedly "because of gases" "nothing is visible". I already described in details (in this chronicle) - why it is a lie. In particular, before THAT X-ray, I well and with success - emptied stomach-intestines, beforehand taking activated carbon and Sinai (having learned - how many hours prior to X-ray it is possible to take this pill), and, as a rule, in case of abdominal X-rays, they gave me to drink special solution of barium.


And then, the next sad drama has evolved, which began with an acute pain in the left eye, which was followed by headache in temporal (both sides) and occipital area.


To my huge regret, no record was saved - about when it happened. Only this alone confirms my serious psychological state, and all circumstances, which continued to develop not in my advantage.


I only remembered that the day before - in a day or two prior to the left eye pains attack - the date number included the figure "7". It could be on the following dates: March 17, March 27, or on April 7, 2017.


For various reasons, neither earlier, nor later - this attack could not take place. But, if it was on April 7-th, then, in that case, it happened next day after passing heart X-ray.


Furthermore, on the next day (after heart X-Ray), I contacted the same clinic (where there is a radiology (in the same building), because my state has sharply worsened, and I asked how I can see the same doctor. It - indirectly - can assume that the close angles attack began - at first with a little notable pain and other insignificant symptoms - on April 7, next day after an X-ray. It is even more probable because 2-3 days before that new health ordeal it was so warm that people were wearing just light jackets, or went even without the outer clothing. It was not possible in March and, moreover, in February.


It is not excluded that - if I (by then) immediately addressed at Emergency (within the first 2-3 hours): my eyes would be saved, and a serious glaucoma, with the damage to the optical nerve: would not develop. But - because of pain, dark strips and flashes in my eyes, and multi-colored circles in the left eye - I could not go alone, without an attendant, and, for a number of reasons, there was nobody, who could accompany me. I could not stare also at the computer screen, and was not able to see in my own medical database, or on Internet - an information on how many hours I have: i.e. in how many hours (after the beginning of such an attack) the damage will become already irreversible. But - all the same - I knew that the threat is real and inevitable, because I told my relatives that if I do not go to hospital, then I can lose an eye. The only thing that remained to me: to call an ambulance, though it was also difficult, because of the next decrease in hearing and a new episode of almost total loss of voice. Besides, they could refuse an ambulance on the ground that I did not lose the mobility. But the main thing: it is panic of next expected mockeries in any Emergency, which literally paralyzed me, without allowing to pick up the phone - and to call 9-1-1. This is a "merit" of doctors-torturers and triage nurses-sadists, who scoffed at me not less than doctors.


Most of the scandalous incidents in the emergency departments in Montreal hospitals are - in details - described in this chronicle.


And, at last, the last - what also stopped me: it is that I can reach an Emergency, but not to see a doctor and not to be given an access to the measurement of the intraocular pressure, having uselessly stayed in the waiting room more than 4-5 hours (or 12, or more hours) without any results. And my fears were not deprived of the basis. When, in October 2018, I addressed to Emergency with the same symptoms and threat to lose an eye, having stayed there more than 5 hours, I was not only denied an examination by a doctor, but they refused even to measure the intraocular pressure, and a bit later said that it is necessary to wait for many more hours (as I understood - more than 12 hours); and, so, I was forced to go back home. Therefore, firstly, the attack of the closed-angle syndrome (which, probably, provoked glaucoma) - was even more dangerous outside of home, in the torturous hours-long waiting Emergency room environment, and in its brutal conditions (even the chairs for the waiting rooms in the Emergency departments, they, perhaps, deliberately choose more rigid and more inconvenient to drive people away from the Emergencies); the stressful situation and all the mayhem connected with addressing to Emergency, and all my horrific experiences in Emergency rooms could only worsen my state and could result in a blindness - instead of prevention of glaucoma.


This next drama - the development of the closed-angles glaucoma: is a direct consequence of the mockeries and sabotage during my addresses to ophthalmologists, into eye clinics, and in emergency departments of Montreal hospitals (with the alarming eye problems and - already by then - a borderline or elevated IOP), and also - later - the result of the firm refusal of an access to ophthalmological care and to IOP exams on 2 last doctors' referrals to ophthalmologists.


I warned doctors, hospitals, and clinics that their actions will lead to further destruction of my sight and to consequences, unpredictable and sad for me, and also wrote about it in my special chronicle "The right for murder", in my letters to friends, relatives and acquaintances.


The full responsibility - for what happened to mine eyes - bear doctors and medical institutions in Montreal.


Apparently, the closed-angle syndrome and the intraocular pressure on the verge of norm (almost elevated) - were present already in 2013-2014, when (concerning the vitreous body detachment) I addressed to St.-Mary Hospital's Emergency, which (after my fierce fight for it) sent me to St.-Mary's eye clinic for examination, but I was not registered; not given medications; not offered follow-ups; not put under ophthalmologists supervision; not registered as a patient in St. Mary's eye clinic with an opportunity to visit oculists; was refused any medical documents; and my demands to inform my family doctor concerning the eye exam were ignored.


The same repeated then in private clinics in 2013-2014.


Then, during few months - depending on when there was the first close angles syndrome attack - I unsuccessfully tried to obtain an access to an ophthalmologist.


I addressed to clinics without rendezvous, to specialists-doctors (whom I visited with a request to help me to see an ophthalmologist), in St. Mery's eye clinic, and to other medical institutions - with a request to get an access to an ophthalmologist, but everywhere I encountered a blank wall.


Then my acquaintances prompted to me that it is possible to address not to an ophthalmologist, but to an optometrist, and to get a referral to an ophthalmologist from an optometrist (I did not know this; but NO ONE among innumerous doctors, nurses, medical secretaries, and among other medical workers, to whom I turned with my plea to help me to save my vision - told me that I can check the IOP and to get an access to an ophthalmologist through an optometrist!!!!), but - when I began to call dozens of optometrists' phones numbers - they at once warned me that they do not work with patients on the bases of social benefit (welfare slip) document.


Only in half a year, or a year later I learned that - by then - it was very strange: because such a policy of oculists began to develop only 1-2 years later in response to further government's decisions, which resolutely destroyed the public health care, and which - by then - were not made yet.


Does it mean that all my calls were redirected to a some "lime" phone? Or the offices of optometrists were warned about my call in advance?


So I found myself at the deadlock again...


Only my family doctor referred me to an ophthalmological exam; however, not to an ophthalmologist, but - at least - to an optometrist; nevertheless, again it was necessary to wait - and (again) time was wasted whereas I needed an urgent help.


And only on May 3, 2017, I, at last, had in hands a REAL referral to a specialist ophthalmologist, but it was already late: it was impossible now not only to prevent glaucoma development, but it already advanced too far, STRONGLY injuring the optical nerve.


My family doctor had actually saved my eyes, but a threat of blindness hung the next black cloud over the horizon of my life.


The eczema on the left elbow, which was not passing for months; a sharp aggravation of lower extremities blood vessels' problem; and not less than 10 other illnesses fell upon me one by one or together since April 2017.


Then it was an ordeal with the right hand's forefinger, which was deeply cut under suspicious circumstances. An infection quickly expanded through the whole finger, and, probably, injured the cartilage of the main joint, and provoked deformation. As a result, this forefinger became much thicker than a forefinger of the left hand. All this occurred against the background of medical sabotage, when I was denied ANY treatment, and when doctors completely ignored the fact that all problems with this finger began because of a cut and the spread of infection.


I could not achieve any prescription of antibiotics, anti-inflammatory, physical therapy, and other medical measures, and the report on this finger's X-ray was incorrect, downplaying the magnitude of the injury - with the purpose to correspond the doctor's policy and to protect him from any liability concerning his decision not to appoint any medical measures.


Now, not only the degradation of hearing and wrist's and left shoulder's arthritis prevented me to play piano as fluently as before, but also the deformed right hand's forefinger.


All these pathological changes could be prevented or cured if not medical sabotage.


Meanwhile the iridotomy, which was performed too hasty, without waiting for the effects of the conservative treatment, and without granting me a choice of options (i.e. without letting me to choose between conservative treatment, iridotomy, cataract surgery (that can stop a closed-angle syndrome, and better solve all problems; etc.), and without providing a chance to get an access to the picture, which shows the extent of optical nerve's damage BEFORE iridotomy (I insisted on that, but was refused - even when said that I'll pay for it). An expected more aggressive conservative treatment, using different means, from drops to orally taken medications, was not provided.


The laser iridotomy became a real disaster: perhaps, the optical nerve was even more injured during this procedure, which also caused a terrible dysphotopsia, the scotopia and the pupil degraded, and provoked a cataract.


The angles did not open all the same; the intraocular pressure was all the same badly controlled by eye drops; but no additional drops were appointed, which opened a wide door for the further injury of the optical nerve and faster development of cataract. No further surgical procedures were proposed. I can be mistaken completely, but, perhaps, all this occurred only because I have no funds for a treatment through a private medical insurance, and that - therefore - I would become a too expensive patient for this doctor if he would apply another scenario.


It is necessary to write a whole book about Dr. Sejean's mistreatment, who provided no help for improving my degraded hearing, and to prevent its further degradation. He also provided no help and no diagnosis concerning the frequent loss of voice.


CONCLUSIONS - 2


In my case, the state system of public medical care is used - in many occasions - as a repressive tool for prosecution and physical elimination of dissidents.


Whoever stood behind these repressive methods (the state; foreign governments with their long hands in Canada; or groups of politically-involved individuals): they do not meet any restrictions or obstacles in the territory of Canada.


In last 10 years (from Harper to Trudeau), doctors and medical institutions began to cooperate actively with the enforcement agencies in planting of the political terror.


The general bullying and the spreading of the fear of an expected retaliatory response to any disagreement with the authorities (or insubordination) intimidated doctors and prevented their readiness to help the victims doomed by this partially sadistic health care system.


The artificial character of this so-called "health-care crisis" is obvious and underlined by innumerous facts and tendencies, as, for example, the fact that, while 7 million (!) of Canadians have no family doctors (the biggest number of such patients is in Quebec), thousands of doctors in Canada are denied residency in 2019-2023 (under a standard formulation "does not match residency"), and who knows how many nurses are denied license in Quebec under a discriminatory formulation of "poor knowledge of French" (which is often just not true).


Brainless crowds (because crowds are always brainless) can be seduced by anything - from nationalism to "security", and from "racial purity" to "foreign threat", - but the real reason for this national tragedy is savage commercialization-privatization of the public medical domain, and medical workers' flow-out from the public sector to the domain of private health-care.


Used to be one of the best in the world, the Canadian health care system, nevertheless, quickly degraded - and becomes a remnant of notoriously repressive services of the tyrannical European regimes of the 1930-s.


The field of the criminal health-care expands not from day to day, but from hour to hour.


So-called euthanasia - the "medically assisted suicide": became a norm in Canada and in a number of European countries. Only absolutely naive people can trust in the tales that, allegedly, humanity and compassion have "inspired" the legislators, and that they adopted the laws on legality of the doctors-assisted suicide (a medical murder) not for economic and socioeconomic benefits.


The mentally ill; the elderly population's members; the addicts; the homeless; the former inmates, released from prisons; the disabled people; and the representatives of other neglected social categories, who are killed on (allegedly) "compassionate ground": they are so-called "social ballast" ("useless waste for the society", as libeled them the contemporary monsters), and here the modern barbarians - under a cover of demagogy about "humanity": are cynically introducing the standards, which legalized this murder.


There will pass no more than 10 more years, and the vast majority of the victims of euthanasia will be destroyed under pressure or on coercion.


A doctor, who heals patients in the morning, but in the evening (or visa versa) goes to kill others patients: turns into an executioner, and the whole domain of medical help becomes a domain of the bloody human sacrifice and concentration camps-style mass murders.


In a similar way arises a criminal "health care" on the bases of a medical system under the flag of compulsory "obligation" to donate donor organs. Some Canadian provinces and a number of European countries adopted such a law - under which the body of any person after death becomes a "public property" and a source of donor organs by definition, and a consent of a dying and his relatives, or a voluntary expression of such a desire for this purpose is not necessary anymore.


It is not a counteraction to the organized crime, which is engaged in innumerous murders of people for the sake of donor organs, but the same criminal syndicate, similar to the wild bloody enterprise of criminals.


If, for example, it is known that a patient, who is presently between life and death, will remain a helpless disabled person for the rest of his natural existence: why to save him if his body can serve "useful" members of society? Or, if, for example, an injured homeless person is badly mutilated by his injuries, and here, in the next hospital's room-unit - here is a VERY rich dying person, whose life can be saved through the transplantation of the homeless' man organs: whom, you thing, the cruel system will save? And it is only 2 examples from a series of the nightmares, which turned imaginations of horror films into reality.


The criminal health care works "for 2 fronts", turning into victims both patients, and medics. So, medical nurses are exposed in Canada to terrible extensive exploitation: they are forcibly obliged to work overtime like robots, sometimes - up to 24 hours daily. In such medical departments as Emergency, surgery, oncology, traumatology, intensive care, etc. - many nurses burn out and become disabled after 5-6 years of work.


As for my own case: only compassionate and brave help of some health workers helped me to stay alive after series of very dramatic perturbations. If not some altruistic medics: I would be already doomed by the System.


However, the post-humanistic ideology and the social-medical policy of the modern governments brainwashed too many representatives of the medical profession, and there are less and less altruistic and brave doctors around.


The following facts demonstrate that the policy of undermining my health continues:


1. Since 2007 (when I was hit by car), the medical authorities and their puppet-doctors continuously refusing an echocardiogram and duplex and double Doppler veins ultrasound of the lower extremities; a referral to cardiologist (I once lost an access to Dr. Kostiuk: perhaps, he retired). Partially, such a permanent refusal of the above-stated diagnostic procedure can be linked to the continuing suppression of the information about the driver of the car that hit me in autumn 2007, and the authorities' cover up of this accident (or an incident?). The health workers also sabotaged the medical care right after this accident, when I turned to St.-Mary Hospital's Emergency for help, and in other medical institutions concerning the injuries and urgent health problems connected to the traumas.


2. Since 2005, and later, the medical authorities and their puppet-doctors are ignoring my health problems connected to 3 cases of inexplicable indisposition on November 3, 2005; January 7, 2013; and June 21, 2016, and, especially, concerning the traumas of the cerebral character after these sudden indisposition attacks. [Similar to so-called Havana syndrome (a remark of 2023).] I did not receive any explanations, or any diagnoses from doctors. The computer tomography after one of these 3 episodes (on January 7, 2013) did not explain the origins of the found pathologies, their reason and the remoteness of the cerebral traumas. These episodes were followed by the symptoms similar to symptoms of microwave radiation or a blow of an ultrasonic wave.


3. The deadlock state of the diagnostics and treatment of my gastroenterological problems is connected to the sabotage of true laboratory and other diagnostic procedures. Numerous laboratory analyses, X-rays, and ultrasonography, and a computer tomography, colonoscopy, and other exams found no clues (under the pretext of such excuses as, for example, "abdominal gases", etc.). (It is documentary shown in this chronicle). An endoscopy, administrated by Dr. Szego, "was missing" (its report and the whole data on this exam was completely lost). In 1996, Dr. Mishkin (following another endoscopy (which identified a gastric infection) appointed a course of antibiotics (concerning this gastric infection), and then no gastroenterological problems disturbed me up to 2006. In 2007: an endoscopy done in the old Royal Victoria Hospital was lost (the result and all data disappeared). 2009-2010: 2 exams by means of manual colonoscopy endoscope in doctor's office followed. After 2010, such exams never repeated. September 22, 2012 - colonoscopy. Only 1 only page of the exam's report survived; other pages of this report disappeared. What remained, claims: a splenic bend - telangiectatic; sigmoidal changes of vascularity. Recommendations: to stay under the observation of the doctor; to wait for the results of biopsy. The biopsy results never appeared; the deviations revealed by colonoscopy considered insignificant; no treatment was appointed. After this colonoscopy: gross! hematuria + self-produced hematosp. + hematochezia; acute urological infection; fever; high temperature; severe pain; discharges of the blood clots (fibrinferments), etc. After this colonoscopy the gastroenterological and urological problems doubled. 2011-2019: gross hematochezia episodes: March 8, 2011 [Tuesday] (hematochezia+hematuria); March 6, 2012 [Tuesday] (hematochezia and hematuria); July 7, 2012 [Saturday] (hematochezia); March 5, 2013 [Tuesday] (hematochezia+hematuria); July 7, 2013 [Sunday] (hematochezia); March 4, 2014 [Tuesday] (hematochezia); November 25, 2014 [Tuesday] (spontaneous hematochezia); March 7, 2015 [Saturday] (hematochezia+hematuria); October 27, 2016 [Thursday] (hematochezia); March 2-3, 2016 [Wednesday-Tuesday] (gross! gross! hematochezia+hematuria); March 9-11, 2019 [Saturday-Monday] (hematochezia). + After colonoscopy. The permanent "proctologic" ulcer becoming wet dermatitis since 2011. The partial [temporary] chronic impassability of intestines and extreme chronic constipations lead to episodes of damage of its lower part. I consider Dr. Szego an excellent expert and wonderful person, who did everything possible to save me from bigger problems. As for intolerable permanent illness, sufferings, and serious decrease of the life quality, I lay all blames for this situation on hospitals and laboratories, but not on the gastroenterologist, for whom all solutions of his patient's situation lied outside of his administrative and medical opportunities.


4. The deadlock situation in the resolution of a scandalous situation of the medical sabotage concerning the problems of ear-throat-nose. Dr. Sejean did not want to render any medical solutions, and other otolaryngologists were made unavailable for me. It is described in details in this chronicle - what level of psychological and physical suffering provoked this sabotage, and how the lack of treatment destroyed my normal professional activity and social life.


5. Lack of access to an adequate treatment of arthritis. From time to time, I am threatened by very close loss of functionality, and - then - by a wheelchair. AFTER 2 urological surgical operations, provoked by the urological drama (described here), which, in turn, was provoked by the doctors, and after other dramatic events, doctors continued refuse timely, adequate, and operational anti-inflammatory treatment, against the background of unavailability (for me) of physiotherapy exercises and other therapeutical treatment. After the departure of Dr. Anna Khananyan to the USA (the rheumatologist, who, for 2 and a half years, saved me from further development of arthritis), all adequate diagnostic procedures were blocked for me. The sabotage of the recognition of obvious pathologies by doctors and radiologists continued. Neither the bones density scan, nor an ultrasound of the shoulder joint, nor other diagnostic procedures after Anna Khananyan's departure were made non-available to me. The sabotage of diagnostics and treatment led to right hand forefinger joint's deformation, and to left shoulder joint's and its soft tissue problems. The lack of financial resources did not allow me to buy Voltaren and other remedies in drugstores for the money, and doctors - in turn - do not appoint any remedies, which I could receive on prescriptions on a discount price or free. The sabotage of traumas, and of the bones' and joints' injuries - connected to a number of traffic accidents and incidents, set up incidents, attacks by "unknown hooligans", provocations and diversions - continues. In 15 years, doctors did not read for me ANY diagnosis. None of them recognized (even RIGHT after an injury!) that these are INJURIES, not natural somatic pathologies; none of them answered my questions; none of them ever issued a medical document or answered verbally - what is the diagnosis of my disease, what type of traumas or what type of arthritis I have, and what are its causes, and whether it is possible to stop the sources of arthritis. My titanic work on myself, all my efforts of self-treatment cannot result in a long-term success without diagnostics and knowledge of what happens to my bones and joints, what causes the arthritis, and what is the present diagnosis. [An editorial remark of Nov. 2018: only when I became patient of Dr. Jan Schultz (the rheumatologist), to whom I was referred by my family doctor, Ivan Rohan, an adequate treatment of arthritis restarted, but all exams-tests (in exception of 1 single), administrated by Dr. Schultz (2 ultrasounds; 1 bone density scan; and 1 of 2 blood-urine tests) have disappeared. These reports never arrived to doctor's office, and, when I personally started to recover them, they were declared "missing". And without the tests-exams no diagnosis concerning arthritis can be produced.]


And these are only 5 of dozens of other problems, which medical sabotage is prolonging the permanent tortures.


It is necessary to agree that the distortions of medical data - summaries, exams, epicrises, and other medical data - by doctors, and ignoring of obvious pathologies for the sake of the concealment of their own mistakes, or of their colleagues' crimes, and manipulations with my tests and analyses for the same reasons (i.e. if a result of laboratory analysis confirms a mistake of a doctor, it vanishes or forged) represent a deadly threat, and that, proceeding from the usual common sense, if such things occur, any procedure - not only such invasive and dangerous as cystoscopy, colonoscopy, etc., but even a usual blood test - potentially poses the same deadly threat by definition.


I never received any real answer from medical ombudsmen to my complaints; an access to the requested information on social, political, or psychiatric insinuations in my medical files was blocked; I also did not receive any answer from the police concerning attacks of "unknown" and known hooligans, pedestrian traffic accidents (when I was hit by cars), etc.; any response - why (from 2005 to 2014) I was exposed to hundreds of interceptions and interrogations by police, police escorts, etc., and was under continuous demonstrative shadowing - and also did not receive any answer - why the police systematically followed me and escorted me on my way to doctors, hospitals, clinics, and on my way to other medical objects.


On my example, it is clear to what extent expanded the planting in Canada (since 2001) of the totalitarian repressive model and strict political censorship, and what will happen to each resident of this country if even more tyrannical "liberal" legislation of "security" (which already materialized now in the form of the bill) is accepted.


If transformation of the democratic countries goes such a course as today, and such regimes with human face as Canada will change to the opposite, and just the gendarme tyrannies alone will remain in the world, which will routinely involve the medical domain into the sphere of the gendarme and cruel functions.


On the blood-freezing irony, all these extraordinary, improbable scientific and technical achievements, and new "magic" medical technologies not only did not make people healthier and happier, but (on the contrary), despite all conveniences and advantages of modern life in the developed countries, only increased the percent of population suffering from numerous diseases, and began to be used as a weapon of blackmails, intimidations, repressions, and tyrannical suppression of all freedoms and rights.


Already in the late 1990-s and at the beginning of 2000-s, I foretold that, contrary to total video-surveillance, to total control and shadowing of innocent citizens, in about 10-15 years the crime rates will begin to grow with a speed of a geometrical progression, and the reason is this total control imposed on citizens, because soon people in big cities will begin to feel like prisoners, and - according to psychology of prisoners - will begin to commit incredible number of crimes. Another reason for predicted (by me) crimes rate was explained by the massive impoverishment of the population, by elimination of citizens' rights and freedoms, and by the massive violations of human rights.


My case gives a unique opportunity to analyze (to the level of preparation) the influence of the consequences of the establishment of this totalitarian electronic prison on human life.


But the most terrible, in my opinion: is this use of medical domain for the purpose of political repressions that crosses out the nature of normal functioning of human society.


But why someone needs to use medicine as a punishment method against the objectionable persons if it is possible "to substitute" it by other tyrannical methods (to put stealthily drugs or other forbidden substances, objects, or images; to accuse of "sexual harassment", etc.), to inflict injuries (to set up beating, road accidents), or even to kill an objectionable person? But, first, other methods are already used against the objectionable persons; secondly, it is, apparently, about an experimental technique by means of which the authorities of a number of countries wish to solve their internal and foreign policy problems, and Canada was made a testing ground; and, thirdly, the health care was already made by the authorities a part of the police state by definition, because such is the nature of any police state.


We, apparently, are witnessing the radical and BASIC reorganization of the whole repressive machine, when the final decision is made to develop methods allowing to put out of action those, who have independent judgments: by means of high-tech devices (including secret developments); computer and network technologies; social networks; and the health care system, which is assigned nearly a central part.


As for Canada, here the system of public health care already represents a quite established secret network of the potential repressive mechanism - owing to its over-bureaucratization, mutual responsibility of doctors and physicians covering each other and hiding any sins of their colleagues, their total impunity in Canada, and the permanent artificial crisis of all health care systems caused substantially by the situation south of Canadian border.


Reserved repressions and the veiled tyranny allow their architects to pursue also the ultra-aggressive foreign policy, saying: it supposedly happens in Iran or in China - repressions, tortures, and executions, and here by us - there is "democracy" and "human rights", and, under this pretext, to escalate the dangerous confrontation, at the same time supporting greater tyrannical regimes, and turning other regimes into tyrannical dictatorships by the means of economic sanctions, political blockade, hostility and provocations, or attempts to organize there coup d'etat.


The same justification serves as the cover for further strengthening of totalitarian censorship in Canada, withdrawals of the entire layers of subjects and problems from the discourse, permitting to discuss "burning" subjects only to the state radio and to several more quasi-state media subjects, announcing any criticism as "intrigues" of China, Iran, Russia, North Korea, or an "meddling into an election campaign", or something else - as it was done by the tyrannical regimes in the 1930-s under the pretext of "fight against enemies' intrigues".


P.S. It is necessary to add that quite often I am forced to ask for medical care because of my social and economic status.


So, if I had an opportunity to buy Voltaren or ingredients for independently prepared medicines, in some cases I could cope also without anti-inflammatory.


That is why actions of doctors so often become a matter of life and death.


And the last remark.


Since 2012 until the beginning of 2016, the search engines - from Yahoo to Google - systematically blocked my access to the most essential medical information.


In parallel - there was a misinformation campaign, when I was redirected on those pages, where the lie concerning any disease and its mechanism - was displayed.


Thus, I could not come - for months - to elementary figures of the norm of the intraocular pressure and danger of its boundary indicators, etc.


How it occurred and how the "medical" Internet was blocked for me - it is explained in the separate book (see BOOK 8).


Therefore, the censorship, profiling, spying on users, and elimination of anonymity and privacy, the introducing of the status of "reliability" or "unreliability", and the totalitarian practice of the international corporations and social networks (such as Facebook) - take full responsibility for undermining my health, not at a smaller degree than the health "care" in not virtual reality.


(Records for February, 2017, and the Conclusion were completed in November, 2018).


CONCLUSIONS - 3


ADDITION: THE SELECTIVE (SHORTENED) LIST

OF THE "LOST", INCOMPLETE, OR "MISSING"

MEDICAL TESTS, EXAMS AND ANALYSES


On December 12, 2002, Dr. Zygmund Zast (Zhast) directed me (at my request) for an abdominal-pelvic ultrasound. On December 26, 2002, I sent a fax with the requisition's copy to Hôpital General de Montréal (Montreal General Hospital), and received an appointed date.

On January 15, 2003, I underwent the ultrasound, and was told that no pathologies are revealed.

However, Dr. Zast did not receive this ultrasound's report, which I did not manage to find also in medical archive, too.


This test was gone irrevocably.


_________________________________


The ultrasound from October 28, 2003.


In the official report, doctor's surname is written like PICHETTE, instead of Piché; the name of the street is written in my address is written as Elmer, instead of Aylmer; and there are other "slips" ("typos").

If information was entered manually, even then 1 "mistake" still could be inacceptable, but, at least, could be "explained" somehow, but 2, 3, and more mistakes are not an accident any more.

However, in 2003, such data as doctor's and patient's surname, the address, phone, etc. - it was already digitalized, through special computer programs, and an incorrect name of the doctor, the street, etc. - it was possible to insert only intentionally.

This unique, exclusive case opens a window to the clues of the mechanism of concealment ("loss") of my medical tests, exams, and analyses, which are automatically becoming unavailable to me and to doctors, but remaining available to someone else (who knows their hidden "codified" data).

Really, it is impossible to find this analysis by name the doctor: the doctor Pishett in reality, probably, does not exist. Search in a name of the patient almost for certain in several months would be blocked: not least because of an intended mistake in the address. I managed "to snatch out" then this official report at the last moment literally from "fire".


(see below:)


An astonishing evidence, contained in this document (and in other medical documents), signifies that - already in 2002-2003 - I had an "unexplained" hematuria; sometimes - gross hematuria. During next 14 years, the urologists produced no diagnosis, no explanation for hematuria, pretending that they "do not know" its causes. Besides all other innumerous evidences of their sabotage, this shockingly long period of time is a proof in itself that doctors did not want to treat me, or were told not to provide medical help for me. It is an extremely disturbing fact that - almost 15 years later - Dr. Morris was still claiming that the hematuria is "unexplained", and denied any substantial medical help. If a 15-years-long period is "not enough" for a simple medical diagnosis (which was evident from the very beginning in 2001): then it can contest doctors' professional qualification. However, because the level of Canadian medical service was one of the highest in the world, and my urologists were some of the best in their profession, an only explanation is that it was a vicious sabotage.

Someone wanted to destroy my life, and was doing it through the medical domain (in addition to all other repressive methods).

_________________________________


In November-December 2000, the Canadian Federal Immigration put the procedural processing of my (and my family members) permanent residence and citizenship status on hold by using the Immigration Medical Services department as an illegal weapon against me and my family.

They fabricated a falsified diagnosis "tuberculosis", and insisted on it even when I presented an alternative "civil" X-ray (which was shown that there is no tuberculosis, and could never been) and 2 doctors' (one of them was a professor-pulmonologist) reports, who refuted Immigration fake diagnosis. The Immigrations' fluorography (used for justifying this diagnosis) was "classified", an access to it was blocked for my doctors and lawyers, and, a bit later, it was proclaimed "missing".

It is outraged that the Canadian health "care" system was able to produce several (there were other - as well) obviously fake "diagnosis", but - during entire 15 years - was not able to produce a simple diagnosis concerning the initial urinal infection and its devastating complications.

Moreover, Immigration officials and one Immigration doctor in Montreal Chest Institute threatened me by an "urological disease" - if I refuse to "undergo the treatment of tuberculosis". (See below:)


Here are copies of some other documents [see below];

(please, be so kind as to recognize that even if such false diagnosis as "tuberculosis" could be fabricated, it is much easier to fabricate a false diagnosis of mental or neurologic disorders):


[see below]


1. Case of compulsory fluorography of IM (200-2001). Only on the basis of this fluorography, the diagnosis "Tuberculosis" appeared in official documents. Access to the original medical document or its copy, or to the x-ray was blocked for me, and for civil [civil, not immigration] doctors and lawyers. [It was declared later that "the tubercular fluorography is lost ("missing").]

2. After uncountable letters of doctors to Immigration department, in which the possibility of TB (tuberculosis) was ruled out (Immigration rejected them later as "not a proof"), a new X-ray was done:


As a result, the immigration fluorography "was not found" (when it was demanded by me and one of my lawyers).


As it is possible to see, this "civil" x-ray absolutely normal (see above).


But also immigration department did not recognize this X-ray as "an evidence", sticking to the "tuberculosis" diagnosis and demanding from me - not looking at any facts and reasons - "to undergo treatment for tuberculosis".


In her letter, an immigration official "did not recognize" the civil X-ray, and continued to insist on the conclusion of the immigration fluorography (already announced "lost"!) used as the one and only pretext (actually: a forgery!) for insinuations of government officials (see below):


[2b. Addition; Post-factum: Thus, having received the result of the civil X-ray, which disproved any tubercular insinuations, the immigration official, who was set on me by her administration, instead of the cancellation of the order of compulsory "treatment" at the Infectious Diseases Unit, which consequences (produced by the counterfeited fluorography) could be the most ominous, sent that letter, in which called in question the identity of the civil X-ray.

With a palpable irritation and fury (read even in the graphic arrangement and the nature of this (see above) hand-written text) she stated wild insinuations that - supposedly - not I could pass this X-ray, but someone else could pass it instead of me, and, on this illegal basis, left the former command to surrender to the Infectious Diseases Unit in force.

The absurdity of her insinuations is obvious: I passed this X-ray with my personal documents registered in the laboratory Clark, like the identification document of the state health insurance, where there is my photo, my name, my birthday data, etc.

On the basis of the above-mentioned letter of the immigration official from Ottawa, another female immigration official - from Montreal's IMM bureau - immediately called me - and again demanded to comply, executing all paragraphs of the "tubercular" letter, threatening, otherwise, to put me into the Immigration prison.

In turn, I - with great difficulties - made a copy of the original "civil" X-ray (the picture), and sent it (in addition to other medical documents, which categorically ruled out the tuberculosis) to immigration department, with a comment, in which specified that the identity of this X-ray is visible already at least on features of my personal specific anatomic building, and, in particular, on pectus excavatum.

Besides, I met United Nation's Human Rights Commissioner, and, thanks to her, this "tubercular swindle" of Canadian Federal Immigration was put to an end.]


_________________________________


Back in November 2000, a counterfeit blood test (see below) on VDRL (on venereal diseases), which I never passed, was presented by Immigration Canada.

This alleged blood test appeared soon after the 1-st episode of Immigration's accusations that I, as if, concealed such "infectious diseases" as VDRL (HIV, etc.), hepatitis B, tuberculosis, etc. - at my entry into Canada.


3b. The hand-written remark specifies - in the left top corner - that this form of the blood test requisition is connected to the procedures of Immigration Medical Services Department.

There is Dr. Giannakis's stamp, but his signature is absent.

In all other requisitions and prescriptions of Dr. Giannakis his signature was present.

4. The result of this counterfeit blood test was attributed to the requisition, which original was never issued to me (see below).

If someone else took it from Doctor Giannakis or his secretary - it was not me, because I never saw it and never held it in my hands, never went to CDL Labs Laboratories to pass this test, and did not pay the specified 18 dollars.

This result, coming out from a non-existing blood sample, was connected with non-existing - for my part - requisition.

As soon as I learned about such "analysis", I immediately sent - by fax - my protest to Laboratories CDL.

However, CDL Labs' administration closed for me an access to other pages and documents (besides this receipt), and did not show me the printout of the result-report's reading (of this fake analysis on VDRL).

After my persistent inquiries, this, alleged "test" - was declared "missing".


The handwritten mark specifies in the left top corner of the document that this requisition (on blood test) - is related to the office of the procedures of Immigration Medical Services of the Federal (Canadian) Ministry of Immigration.

There is doctor Giannakis's stamp, but his personal signature is absent...

[I will add that in other - original - documents, issued by Doctor Giannakis his signature is everywhere.]

_________________________________


Incomplete Urinalysis (see below) of January 8, 2003.


"Urinary tract infection" assumes an identification of an agent (bacterium), or a printout of biochemical indicators, which combination and separate values are associated with an infection, but there is no information or explanation any more.

Besides, there have to be other pages, which are absent.

Suffering from frequent UTI infections, I tried to find them (other pages) in the Medical Archive, but several months (2003) later I managed to receive only this - unique - page again.

In 2005, it was said to me that there is no urinalysis from January 7-9, 2003 in my file any more.

At last, the letter from Medical Archive of April 29, 2015, says that "there is no analysis of urine of January 8, 2003 in your file" [From myself, I will add that, declaring the questionnaire to the worker of the archive, I again orally asked to check data for dates from January 7 to January 9, 2003, but nothing was found]:


6. According to the enclosed document (see below), the above specified analysis "does not exist" (having requested the copy of this analysis from archive, I specified on Jan. 7-9, 2003 as the date of sample's collection):


________________________________


2015: only 1 page of another urinalysis (02-03-2015) - the physical and chemical analysis - survived. This laboratory test from 2 March 2015 was destroyed, as I suspect, on the request of Dr. Brian Morris.


Such indicators as microbiology (bacterial culture), uric acid, and other indicators and components are absent (see below).


After my attempts to learn what happened to other pages (fragments), this urinalysis also "disappeared" from my medical file, from the medical archive, and from all other sources, replaced by an "alleged" (counterfeit) one (see 1+ the page below), which, since that moment, "was attributed" to the same requisition.


See below - the requisition of Dr. Rohan on this analysis (here are the analysis' components [which were lost in this analysis's result-report] checked by the doctor) before it was giving in to the laboratory's registration window:


(see below)


The photo of the same requisition AFTER the marks made in the laboratory during the urine test registration is presented in the previous part (book) of this work. See below - the original result of the urine test on this requisition, signed by Dr. Rohan in February, 2015:


The right copy is a printout from Sante Quebec's database. This file (document) has later disappeared from this database as well. In the left top corner (under document's details) it is printed "patient to return for blood tests", so, it is absolutely clear I will come for the blood test with the same requisition, and I came on April 10, 2015 (the delay explained in the previous part (book) of this work).

A "suggested" (fabricated) urinalysis, which was "attributed" to this test (on the same requisition, written out in February, 2015) after 10-04-2015:


(I will repeat that this counterfeit analysis, besides, was attributed to requisition from February, 2015, and replaced that original test from 2-3-2015 - after 10-4-2015).


And, at last, the same requisition, which "materialized" on Dr. Rohan's table AFTER this whole "story" (the 2-nd page attached to it: it was an additional printout, where it was specified that the urine test is already passed, and now it remains only the blood test; the same is stated inside the original requisition: we can see the highlighted (by a yellow felt-tip pen) section of the Complete Blood Count (CBC) [pointed to not passed yet blood test], and crossed out urine test section [which means: done]; on 2-3-2015, there was also a notice written by a pencil, which now disappeared (erased - or eliminated by a chemical method?). THIS document was taken away in St.-Mary's Hospital's laboratory on April 10, 2015, and had to stay there, but "mysteriously" "materialized" in doctor's office (at his table):


I can provide more examples (if you consider that these are still not enough for the proof that malicious manipulations with my laboratory and other tests - not a product of mine "sick imagination").


Sincerely yours, Lev (Leon) Gunin. June 10, 2015.


The shocking provocation in MGH (HGM - fr.) ER on April 24, 2015, provoked by the triage nurse, on style and methods reminds the style and methods of the triage nurse on October 3, 2007, in St.-Mary's Hospital to such an extent that, since April 25, I asked a question more than once: whether this nurse - Joanna Priestley - participated both in the 1-st, and in the 2-nd provocation?


Having inquired about madam Joanna Priestley, I found out that before MGH (HGM - fr.) she worked as a triage nurse in the English Children's Hospital at Tuper Street (and Rene-Levesque-Dorchester).


Any data is not available about whether she worked in 2007 in St.-Mary's Hospital.


In the official report from 3-rd of October, 2007, the name of the triage nurse is not printed, but entered via handwriting. The name precisely coincides with "J" (Joanna) initial; as for a surname - in my opinion, it was "painted" something similar to "Priestley".


But even if there were 2 different personalities - such a complete match of style and methods means that they were trained and skilled by a same person: a police officer, or an agent of intelligence agencies. In my opinion, it is indisputable.


This provocation was preceded by 3 illegal attempts to carry out my psychiatric evaluation in medical offices of doctors Ivan Rohan, Makeda Semret, and Yury Krasny, without my permission and consent (see the previous events' records).


The most interesting question is: on whose initiative were carried out these lawlessness examinations.


_________________________________


On October 16, 2013, I did an MRI scan in Jean-Talon Hospital.

The date for MRI was twice transferred (changed); instead of the left foot - in hospital"s documents appeared "right"; and, except of MRI, they unexpectedly did also an X-ray without warning me in advance. Plus, the rapport of this MRI later has disappeared for a long period of time!


When on December 17, 2013, I visited the rheumatologist, it was clarified that the medical rapport did not arrive to the doctor, and nothing was not known about it in the medical archive!


In February, 2014 Doctor"s Ury Krasny secretary told that the result of MRI (the rapport) "did not arrive yet".


[Running forward: in 2015 - the result of MRI was "not found".]


I repeat again that after this MRI procedure (16 Oct. 2013), which was done for the LEFT foot, my LEFT eye was damaged. On the same day (on October 16, 2013), by the evening, several transparent floating points, lines and zigzags appeared in the left eye.


This MRI's record and report was found years later by chance, and, possibly, was just temporarily available before its "final" "classification".


In this chronicle the ordeal with this MRI report is described in details in the series of "The Mistreatment of My Injuries".

_________________________________


Lost X-ray from 15 February 2005.


On March 6, 2005, I sent the letter to the office of Medical Records (Medical Records Bureau de Registraire, E1, 42, 687 Avenue des Pins Ouest, Montreal, Quebec H3A 1A1 tel. (514) 843-1605) concerning a delay or loss of the X-ray from February 15, 2005 (inflammation of the right leg's calve combined with the severe pain). The result of X-ray was (by then) usually ready on the same day, or - more rarely - on the next day, but there passed months, and there was no result-report.

In my letter, I told that 4 times I went to Royal Victoria Hospital's archive, and every time they said to me that they "reviewing" my request though in 2006 or 2007 - as a rule - they practiced (formally or informally) issuing the required documents to a patient (who personally came to archive) - as they say, "in hands".

_________________________________


Urinalysis and blood test from May 14, 2014.


This urine test's report is differing from ALL other similar tests from this period, because displaying no abnormalities, in exception of the low indicator of density / specific gravity.


It was administrated because of the symptoms of an acute UTI, and this is one of the reasons to consider this report suspicious and not to trust it.


Actually, the indicator of abnormal (low) density / specific gravity can testify, by the way, about a urological infection, proteinuria, and other very serious problems.


It also did not reveal any micro pathogens through the microbiological culture test. However, its printout contains some non-typical layout features, which differ it from other reports, and this is another reason not to trust it.


In this chronicle, I also described strange "adventures" in the laboratory - when I was passing these bl-ur. tests. It was expected after the strange events in the lab that something will happen to this test, and it happened indeed.


And, finally, as for the blood test on the same requisite: my family doctor and his secretary did not show it to me, and St. Mary's Hospital's archive never issued its copy to me.


When, in 2015 or 2016, I received a package of requested medical documents' copies from Sante Quebec database, the blood test from 14 May 2014 was also missing there.


Thus, it is difficult to consider a urine test genuine - in absence of the second component of the blood-urine test (the blood test), which was "lost", and also considering other suspicious details around this test.


It is possible only to imagine what was in that blood analysis, if it was actually withdrawn.


It is possible that blood test just disappeared right in the laboratory, and - therefore - was "unavailable", and the doctor and his secretary did not want me to learn about it.


However, most likely, it was altered ("modified", forged) by Dr. Makeda Semret, because another very significant detail of this test's report is that it was signed not only by Dr. Dylewski, but also by Dr. Semret: same Dr. Makeda Semret, who set up a bizarre provocation concerning the appointment on 9 Dec. 2013.

__________________________________


Possibly forged urine test and "lost" blood test from 30 May 2014.

On May 30, 2014, in connection with ulcerations in the mouth and an "urological" dermatosis, another requisition on blood-urine test was issued by Dr. Ivan Rohan on, May 30, 2014 (Friday), and, on the same day, this test was done in St. Mary's Hospital's laboratory (right after the visit to the doctor).

First of all, this urine test's report is missing the microbiological culture under a very strange pretext, which is indicated by only one single word: "Antibiotic". However, I did not take any antibiotics by then (in May 2014). If the word "antibiotic" indicates not a presence of antibiotics in the urine sample, but a necessity of a course of antibiotics (due to UTI): then, where is data on this infection? Thus, this urine test's report is definitely forged and not genuine, and the data on the microbiological culture is definitely missing or confiscated. It is indicated under the line about "antibiotic" - "No growth", which usually means: no pathogens appeared. But if the site was "antibiotic" (as indicated) - then the growth was prevented (sabotaged) from the very beginning (see below:). However, even this discrepancy doesn't close the list of all unusual self-contradictions within this medical document, because an additional question represents another remark: "nouveau resultat - amended result ... result was modified after final status set". And, again, another very significant detail of this test's report is that it was signed not only by Dr. Dylewski, but also by Dr. Semret: same Dr. Makeda Semret, who set up a bizarre provocation concerning the appointment on 9 Dec. 2013. See below:


Again, only the specific gravity is below the norm in this report's urinalysis dipstick.


The blood test (passed on the same requisition) was missing again: it did not arrive into my family doctor's office (according to his and his secretary), and I could not recover it from St.-Mary Hospital's medical archive as well (they claimed that this test's report was "not found" "in the system").


However, something like that was expected and predictable after suspicious knocks looking like a provocation or a preparation of a medical sabotage, right at the waiting corridor near the St.-Mary Hospital's laboratory.


When, sitting in the corridor on a chair, I waited for my turn in laboratory, a "manager" in a blue dressing gown (who was looking like an Armenian) approached me, and demanded to show the tag ticket. I asked him - why. That, without answering my question, again demanded to show the tag. I asked what will happen if I do not show it. Then, he answered, I will not be allowed into the laboratory. I was not in a mood to be dragged into another conflict, so, I had to show the tag number. But it appeared that even this was not enough. The "person in charge" demanded from me to name myself. When I provided an assumed (anonymous) name (a pseudonym), he demanded to show my plastic medical card. Here I was indignant, and said that it is confidential.


He suddenly lagged behind.


Theoretically, if someone wanted to withdraw or replace (change) a sample, then - to facilitate the task of such a substitution or sabotage the best tactics is to engage someone like a technician or a cleaner, and, in any case, the malefactors needed to foreknow what number of the tag ticket I am holding: to be able be going beforehand and to arrive just in time to the moment. Not therefore whether that type in a blue dressing gown tried so hard to obtain not only the tag's number, but also to extract from me my ID and the ID of my plastic medical card?


Meanwhile, I felt that something like this will occur. Therefore, approximately in 10 minutes (having made sure that there are none of personnel nearby) after my arrival, I took another (an extra) check tag. I showed to the "man in charge" in a blue dressing gown the 2-nd check ticket (taken later), hoping that it will confuse the planning of the substitution of a sample. But, when I approached a registration window, the nurse-registrar - having taken from me the requisition and my medical card, gave me a yellow cardboard counter and ordered to stand in the special line "with yellow cards". I know that yellow cards and the privilege to go out of turn - is reserved for disabled people, expectant mothers, urgent (special) cases, etc. I did not manage to open a mouth to say that the yellow card is not for me - as the nurse in the registration window already invited the following patient to sit down and actually did not allow me to tell anything.


Any independent objective-sane person will agree that something fishy presented in this whole story by definition. If nobody (among the patients sitting on the corridor) was demanded (by the "man in charge") to show their tags numbers, to name themselves, and to present their medical plastic card, but only me; and if I was separated from other patients by the nurse: it means that something special had to happen with my blood-urine test.


Thus, 2 missing blood tests in a row, and 2 obviously non-genuine microbiology culture urine test's reports, both signed by Dr. Semret: isn't it just over (too much)?


_________________________________


Disappeared thyroid gland ultrasound scan from 21 Nov. 2008.

November-December, 2008. (End of 2008).

At first, the thyroid gland scan was appointed to September 2, 2008. (The date 2/11/2011 - designated the expiration of my medical card).

Later this ultrasound was postponed and rescheduled from September 2 for November 21, 2008.

When the result was ready, my family doctor told me that everything is normal, and no even a single slightest abnormalities have been found.

Nevertheless, he never wanted to make for me a copy of this thyroid gland ultrasound's report from November 21, 2008 to me, and every time used to tell that will give it to me "next time". He did not refuse it ultimately, but "chattered" our conversation, or switched it to another subject, or (again) promised to give me this copy "next time".

It is not known: whether he participated in the cover up of the disappearance of this report (it is quite possible that the result of this ultrasonography already by then just gone, and the doctor was obliged to cover its loss; or there was something (in this report) that the System never wanted to show).

Perhaps, this scan showed other problems, and, in particular, with the phonatory bands.

In December, 2008, I addressed hospital's archive, having filled the corresponding form, with a request for the copy (of the ultrasound from November 21, 2008).

I never received this copy, and when - in 2009 - I personally visited St.-Mary Hospital's medical archive, trying to find out what happened to this result, I was answered that they "cannot find it" "in the system".

Meanwhile, judging by blood tests, something was not OK with the hormonal function of the thyroid gland by then (see in this chronicle: Blood tests from April 23, 2008; September 23, 2008; and September 8, 2008).

Having seen the result of the analysis from September 2, 2008, I noticed to my family doctor that, in my case, the abnormally high TSH indicator for certain demonstrates organism's reaction to an infection (the developing the antibodies), which - theoretically - could attack and temporarily "injure" the thyroid gland. In practice, I considered a possibility of such a scenario very small, but, theoretically, a partial failure (dysfunction) of the function of the thyroid gland because of the attack of the antibodies: is quite real. The doctor responded nothing to my remarks.


___________________


Lost (December 14, 2010) pages of the blood test report.

Probably, not accidentally I did not receive a copy of the 2-nd page of the blood test report-result from December 14, 2010. This page was absent in my family doctor's office, as well as in the hospital's archive. They told me that this page "cannot be found" "in the database".

My demands of a written statement about the loss of this missing page were just ignored.

Significantly that this particular page contained the indicators on endocrinology. _____________________


On August 31, 2011, my family doctor administrated a blood test.

I passed this blood test on the same day, 31 Aug. 2011.

The copy of this test was never given to me.

I did not manage to receive a copy of this blood test report neither from my family doctor, nor from St. Mary's Hospital's medical archive, nor after my address to ombudsman.

It is only possible to imagine what level of sugar (probably) and other abnormalities had to be there that the copy of this blood test was blocked for me on all channels! __________________________________


Missing, incomplete, "erased", or altered tests in April 2012.

My family doctor left the country for more than a month, then he was "to a limit" "busy in hospitals".

I was forced to "disturb" the walk-in clinics, becoming convinced of the bizarre incompetence of the doctors, who received patients there at that time.

Any promise to let me know if there arrives an analysis, was broken.

In total, I did 5 tests.

3 of them disappeared without a trace. 1 contained a crossed out section in the column of the result-report.

The most interesting happened to the last analysis, from April 18, 2012.

I immediately requested the copy from the medical archive (having filled out a special form).

The report-result had to arrive to the doctor (who administrated this analysis) not later than in 10 days. According to my information, it had to become available in 7 days (I omit the details).

20 days passed, and, still, nobody reported to me about the result of this blood-urine test from 18 Apr. 2012 (done in St.-Mary Hospital's Laboratory).

I went to the medical archive (accompanied by my wife) and demanded a copy in hands.

2 archive's workers behaved extremely aggressively.

In the presence of my wife, they began to shout and scream at me, to offend me verbally and by their insulting gestures: in spite of the fact that I accused nobody of anything, demanded nothing, did not raise my voice, and showed no indignation.

The point of their offensive shouting was the follows.

They claimed that the results of all patients' tests, procedures, and analyses are, allegedly, the property of medical institutions, and a patient "has no right to declare the rights for them".

I objected, having emphasized that - if I had no right for a copy of an analysis' report, - then also the procedure of filling out the questionnaire form on the request of obtaining such a copy would be void, and would not be provided.

I managed to receive the copy of one - and only - urine analysis - from March 23, 2012.

The test for microbiological culture did not reveal any microorganisms.

As for a hematuria, this analysis confirmed it.

My family doctor (I had an appointment with him on May 11, 2012, 10:15) - at my request - tried to get ab access to the result-report of the same analysis (from 18 Apr. 2012), but unsuccessfully.

He had to prescribe a course of antibiotics "blindly" (empirically) that is potentially accompanied by decrease in efficiency.

By then, the infection began to affect internal organs, and the significant hematuria also testified about it.


___________________________________


Ultrasound from August 3, 2012.

An "exotic" feature of its summary: at the very beginning, it is written "for patient with bladder transit cells carcinoma" (in other words: for a patient with an especially aggressive form of cancer). It is necessary to have strong nerves and some knowledge (in this field) not to be hit by panic, having read such summary. Perhaps, my enemies would like such a succession of events, but - so far - God was merciful.

Certainly, those - who forced doctors to initiate my urological problems (a long-term infection with numerous recurrences of acute character) - were planning to provoke such an outcome (besides the numerous complications destroying my organism). Only good doctors save me from obliteration.


___________________________________


Blood test (September 6, 2012): its 6-th page showed abnormalities on very serious hematologic indicators.

Such deviations could mean - at least - an inflammatory process and other phenomena, which demanded an urgent medical intervention. But no reaction of doctors followed.

Whether accidentally I managed to receive only this one and only page of this blood test's report?

It is only possible to imagine what was on other pages, if an access to this FULL report was blocked equally for the doctor, and for me, and was "missing in the archive?! ____________________________________


November 9, 2012: urine test, administrated by my family doctor, did not find an infection.

The doctor promised to call about the report of this analysis anyway: in case of a positive or a negative result, but did not call.

It became clear later that he received this test's report with an enormously big delay.


____________________________________


Completely "missing" urine test from 7 Dec. 2012.

December 6, 2012 (Thursday): concerning a new aggravation, with hematuria and other symptoms, I was seen - at 16:50 - by Dr. Morris. He did several tests, and told to come next day, Friday, December 7, 2012.

But for the next day, December 7, his behavior and his attitude towards me suddenly changed to the worse. He began to call in question each my word (in particular, he "doubted" about hematuria), did not wish to believe that Protrin "removed" practically all urological symptoms and inconveniences, and said a very strange (even shocking) phrase that - supposedly - I am a "too healthy person". Without having got from him even a requisition for a urine test, I got such a requisition in a walk-in clinic.

I went with this requisition for a urine test to a laboratory on December 11, 2012.

However, I never managed to receive a copy of this analysis' report.

It expands and prolongs further the list of completely lost analyses: probably, the longest than by any other patient in Canada!

_________________________________


"Lost" blood test from 29 Feb. 2005.

On February 29, 2005, the doctor directed me to blood test concerning joints' problems. (X-ray of the left hand - on June 26, 2005 - found "nothing significant").

Later, Dr. Krasny told me that, allegedly, "this blood test "showed" nothing significant", but refused to provide its copy.

My attempts to get a copy of this test in the medical archive and in the laboratory did not bring to anything...

__________________________________


Temporary "missing" left elbow X-ray from 4 Mar. 2015.

March 4, 2015: on requisition of my family doctor, I passed an X-ray of the left elbow, but in the middle - and then at the end - of April, 2015, the doctor claimed that he never received this X-ray report, which did not arrive in his office.

However, I found out that in the Intelerad PACS system (pacs.vmmed.com) this X-ray - under the designation "X-Ray 20150304-053" - was noted as "sent by fax to Dr. Ivan Rohan (514) 731-0395". At first, I did not know - whom to trust: my family doctor, or the Intelerad system (see above, in the section - 11 (series The Urological Drama) - there are more details about the Intelerad PACS system in connection with the activity of the manipulators with medical data and information), to which full database apparently both Robert Cox Sr., and Robert Cox Jr. had an unlimited access.

Still, a bit later, I decided that, knowing my family doctor for many years, I have to recognize that his words have much more weight for me.

There are almost no doubts that this sabotage was performed on the level of BELL or at the level of Intelerad system.

This sabotage did not allow me to receive anti-inflammatory in time from my family doctor (who still waited for this X-ray result), which resulted in damage to the joints. (Some of original results of medical pictures - X-rays, ultrasounds, etc.: could be also distorted or completely replaced with false images also at the level of someone from Intelerad system, and, first of all, I have in view the report of the ultrasound from February 2016.)


A similar ordeal happened to the report of the MRI-scan [Jean-Talon Hospital (October 16, 2013)]. Its result never came to Dr. Ury Krasny's office, which did not allow the doctor to obtain additional and very important information about what in particular occurs and what is the problem with bones and joints, and, respectively, to appoint an adequate and timely treatment.

__________________________________


The sabotage of the urine test on 27 Nov. 2014, in Montreal General Hospital.

The sabotage of my lab analyses happened also in the laboratory of Montreal General Hospital. First, I could not receive a copy of urine test's report [8-9 January, 2003 (MG Hospital)], and it became clear later that all its pages, except of one, disappeared without traces. That single page, which was not "missing", specified a "urological infection" ('Urinary tract infection'), but no more explanation was provided, which means that the test is void. (See above under the corresponding date).

On November 27, 2014 - in the same laboratory - they set up a sabotage of the sample for the urine test that was specified in the requisition, but was ignored in the laboratory. This whole provocation was very skillfully arranged.

This incident (November 27, 2015) is described in details in the series "The Urological Drama" - under the corresponding chronological date.

However, this laboratory not only sabotaged the urine test, but also sabotaged some of the blood test's components, indicated in the requisition. It was indicated in the requisition: 1) Electrolytic profile. 2) Liver profile. 3) Special immunoglobulin-A test. 4) Hematologic test: ANA (anti-nuclear antibodies), full blood count, prothrombin, PTT, reticulocytes, sedimentation. 5) Serological ASO test. 6) Microbiology (culture) (urine and blood test). 7) Urine test.

The laboratory just ignored some of these indicators.

This lab also did sabotage manipulations with other analyses administrate by doctors Ivan Rohan and Yury Krasny.

____________________


Non-complete and manipulated blood-urine test from 22 Sep. 2015.

Already being a patient of Dr. Morris, in September 2015 I, still, booked an appointment with my previous urologist, Dr. El-Hakim, whom I stopped visiting because of several reasons: police intimidations / harassment in Pointe-Claire; pags of remorse in connection with the fact that I, Montreal's resident, take place of someone in P.-C., making the overcrowded waiting room even more overcrowded; Dr. El-Hakim's advice to find an urologist, who works directly in a hospital, because, as he said, he suggested that I need a surgery; etc. The reason of my appointment with Dr. El-Hakim was that I attempted to receive a requisition for blood-urine tests, which Dr. Morris denied. I suspected that now hematuria has surpassed all the previous levels; that the chronic urinal infection is now affecting the blood formula; that a danger of uric stones' formation has appeared because of the same factors; etc.


On September 22, 2015 I went to pass this test in the Verdun Hospital's laboratory.


The blood test showed several abnormal indicators, like the low level of glucose and creatinine (kidneys function) and high bilirubin; and - in the urine test: a very high presence of blood and erythrocytes; and also oxalates crystals (the high risk of kidneys / bladder stones formation).

However, if I understand it correctly, the microbiology test was actually sabotaged, and - again - the report suggests that the patient is taking antibiotics, which is not true, because I did not take any antibiotics at that time. Sharing my bewilderment concerning the lack of medical data for concluding a right diagnosis, Dr. El-Hakim even marked a venereology factor in the requisition (the test was negative, as it was expected), but the remark regarding this test shockingly shows that the microbiological culture was not studied, because the remark suggests that they did not check the growth of the microorganisms, as one of the sample's components (parts) - a small test tube - was missing [the same indicates a remark of the "source" line, while Dr. El-Hakim clearly indicated the microbiology urine culture in the requisition] (see below):


It is clear that the small glass test tube for microbiology culture was missing, which made the test void; also: I did not take antibiotics; if I was taking antibiotics, the whole microbiology culture test would be impossible in advance, or incorrect.


The same happened in this hospital (an ordeal with the glass test tube for microbiology) on 20 Mar. 2016.

_________________________


Sabotaged microbiology culture urine test on 20 Mar. 2016.

In the Emergency department of Verdun Hospital (March 20, 2016), I was given a test tube for a general sample collecting and another test tube for the culture of microbiology.

While there was a label with my name and with my ID number on a test tube for the general analysis, there was no identification sticker on a test tube for microbiology culture.

Returning to the triage room with a sample, I asked the hospital triage attendant (a male nurse) - why my name and medical identification is absent on the second test tube. How it is possible then to know that it is my sample? In a mandative tone he demanded that I should give him the sample, and ordered me to go away to the waiting room, or - otherwise - he will call security guards.

It is obvious that - if the test tube for the general test had a sticker with an ID, but the test tube for microbiology culture had no ID, so, it was obviously sabotaged in order to sabotage the test on the presence of bacteria.

When in April, 2016, 2 doctors, using the access of the File Quebec, studied the report of my visit to Verdun Hospital's Emergency, the culture of microbiology was absent. However, when I received the same report from the hospital's archive much later, I found a page of culture with a negative result. Obviously, it was added at the end of April, and was not based on anything.

At the same time - in violation of the law - there is no name and ID in the official report of the male triage nurse, and, therefore, there is no name of the hospital attendant or a young specialist, who so openly and maliciously refused to provide an identification for the test tube for microbiology culture.

And, because my visit to Emergency in a very poor health state was accompanied of 2 doctors' open mockeries, this "small glass tube ordeal" is shockingly significant.

________________


Urine test's microbiology culture "confused" in Royal Victoria Hospital's Emergency "with a test of another patient" (7 Apr. 2016).

April 7, 2016: in Royal Victoria Hospital's (Glen Site) Emergency department.

When Dr. Morris set up a cystoscopy test as a pre-condition of the lithiasis removal operation, I warned him of the possible deadly consequences (complications), demanding a preventive course of antibiotics, and other preventive measures, but he refused to provide them.

As I warned Dr. Morris, the consequences of the cystoscopy were indeed devastating and life-threatening, and, after Dr. Morris's refusal to provide medical help (concerning the cystoscopy's complications), I came to Royal Victoria Hospital's Emergency with high temperature; urinal retention; bleeding with big blood clots; fever; extreme fatigue; unbearable pain; and other very serious symptoms.

The System and Dr. Morris personally were interesting in cover up of Dr. Morris's crimes, and the interested persons did all possible attempts to destroy me to death, or to brake me morally, and to destroy all evidences of what happened to me.

And, again, the microbiology culture became a key proof of Dr. Morris's wrongdoing, and, thus, had to be destroyed. I told my wife right away: "They going to destroy the microbiology result" - and this indeed happened. See below:


At first, I was informed that an infection was found in the sample, but later my sample was announced presumably 'mixed' with a sample of other patient, and an access to its result (and, consequently, to information on what bacterium is found) was blocked for me. However, it is purely illogical: if I don't know the name of another patient and his ID: what's the difference, why they could not name the bacterium?

I was thrown out from hospital with disturbing symptoms of an acute urological infection, with partial ischuria, high temperature, suspicion of dangerous uterus abscess, with nearly 20 thousand leukocytes and other blood formula abnormalities that shown the blood test. (This case is described in this chronicle with all details and the sequence of events, and with the medical documents copies.).

_____________________


Ultrasound (3 Feb. 2016) ("February "5").

The report of this ultrasound contradicted the real facts and real situation, and, first of all, its conclusion about "gases", which, allegedly, did not allow to "see" the internal organs. By then, there were no "gases" that could interfere with the examination; I was especially skinny during this period, which is a huge advantage for ultrasound; and, also, ALL following - next - ultrasounds, done in next months, accurately "saw" bladder stones. Special factors, which had to prevent an incorrect result of this ultrasound, are:

1. In order to avoid difficulties in the ultrasound reading, I did not eat almost 48 hours, and early in the morning, before going to this procedure, I "emptied" the stomach.

2. 2 days prior to this procedure I took the tablets of activated coil and Senna.

3. On February 3, 2016 the stomach was soft, empty, nothing had to interfere with the best scanning.

4. Since 2013, I lost weight, and - since 2014 - no excess "fat" was left on me at all. On the contrary, from the middle of 2015 and till the end of 2017, I was - "skin and bones" (and muscles).


So, proceeding from the described circumstances and the listed conditions, an incorrect ("obscured by gases") result of an ultrasound from February 3, 2016, was absolutely improbable.


How it is possible to explain the fact that exactly in a month another scan showed stones in the bladder, which were not "seen" by the previous scan (ultrasound) on February 3, 2016?


It is absolutely impossible.


Or, maybe, all other scans, performed till cystoscopy, were incorrect?


_____________________________


Sabotaged microbiology culture urine test on 3 May 2016.

May 3, 2016 (a preoperative analysis): There written in this test's report: 4. URINE ANALYSIS. * "Ascorbic acid is found. It prevented the chemical analysis. [(...)??] Do not accept vitamin C or its additives within 2 days".


I do not take and never took ascorbic acid in any form, and did not buy vitamin C additives.


In this period particularly, I would never take ascorbic acid (vitamin C), because it provokes the formation of oxalates (uric stones).


It is easy to guess - why this particular test was sabotaged. I asked Dr. Morris to administrate a preventive course of antibiotics right before the lithiasis surgery, but he refused. If the test on May 3, 2016, would find an infection, Dr. Morris would have no choice, but to issue the course of antibiotics, or, if he would refuse again, then I would go to ombudsman, to St.-Mary Hospital's administration, and would demand another surgeon, so, the easiest way for Dr. Morris and for someone in the hospital's administration (and for someone in the government, who was standing behind that someone in hospital's administration) was to destroy this test.


____________________________


A suspicious ultrasound report (29 July 2016).

My family doctor sent me for the transrectal prostate scan, but - in the hospital (St.-Mary's Hospital) - instead of it, they performed on July 29 a usual abdominal-pelvic ultrasound scan.

But even it was actually sabotaged, because - again - the report is mentioning the "gases" as a pretext of incomplete and "obscure" ultrasound's "vision".


It cannot be true, because:

1. By then I was especially skinny, which is a huge advantage for an ultrasound.

2. In order to avoid difficulties in the ultrasound reading, I did not eat almost 48 hours, and early in the morning, before going to this procedure, I "emptied" the stomach.

3. 2 days prior to this procedure I took the tablets of activated coil and Senna.

4. The stomach was soft, empty, nothing had to interfere with the best scanning.


This report is summarizing that all internal organs - liver, kidneys, a gall bladder, etc. - "are unremarkable"! (More detailed description of what is specifically occurred, is given in the series "The Urological Drama": see records for Wednesday, July 29, 2016).


The only things that were "remarkable" - there are the same details that already were in the database on former ultrasounds (from where someone copied them). Therefore, it is impossible to judge even about the BPE - because just the same indicator already presented in one of the previous ultrasounds, and it was simply rewritten from there.


The technician, who was carrying out the ultrasound, did it in the most thorough, very carefully examining liver and right kidney, and I know that she is a good expert. Then she told me not to leave the room - because a radiologist will come for some additional examinations. But nobody came. This is also strange.


Then, the language of this report, and its layout is hinting at the fact that this report was not based on the real ultrasound scan data from 20 Jul. 2016, but was copied from the computer database (see below:)


It seems that diagnostics is carried out precisely and carefully - only not for me and not for my doctors, but for somebody else...

_____________________


Vanished blood test and sabotaged microbiology culture urine test from 16 Nov. 2016.

Once again the microbiological culture was sabotaged under one of the fishy pretexts: "mucus"; "low count: ID not done".

As for the blood test from the same date and on the same requisition: it disappeared ENTIRELY. Nor in my file by my family doctor, nor in archive of St.-Mary's Hospital's archive it was "not found"...


_____________________


These are not even a quarter of all examples from 2000 to 2016.


After 2016, problems with laboratory tests and other medical exams stayed the same.


There are lost, incomplete, missing, or unreliable lab tests and other medical exams among them (2017-2023). However, since 2017, the number of laboratory tests and other medical exams in 5-8 times fewer than before 2017, and, thus, the situation has, possibly, became even worse. During and after Covid pandemic, an access to blood-urine tests, and to other medical exams was almost completely blocked for me in general.


Another scary development is the modification of 1999 - 2017 medical database, which includes the replacement of old original medical documents by new forged ones; addition of never-existed medical documents and medical data into the old databases; and new falsification of the previous old medical records.


For example, I discovered - among the medical data on me - newly "invented" documents, which replaced the lost ones in 2000 - 2017, including "new" microbiology culture. Let's suppose that - back in 2014 - 2016 - I complained to an ombudsman about a lost page of microbiology culture, which did not exist by then (was "missing"), but in 2001 - 2003 this page suddenly "reappeared" (or, to be more precisely: appeared), backdated and forged. Whoever do it - is doing it with a shocking cynicism, because such backdated pages have a new look and new layout (never used in the past years). When - in 2019 - I tried to recover my lost laboratory tests and other medical data from medical archives: these documents did not exist. But they were suddenly "found" in 2022.


This is just another reminder that we live in the Orwellian virtual reality, which refutes all norms and laws of earthy sanity and logic. And I think that this new devilish world is not less dangerous for the rulers than for ordinary people (or for marginalized thinkers like me). I don't divide people according to their place in the society, and I don't think that the rulers are "worse" than the rest of population. The proportion of monsters and non-monsters among them is the same. But now the point is not about this especially, but about the danger for the ruling class in general and the rulers in particular that pose for all of us this Orwellian virtual "medical" imposter. No one in the government is safe, no one is granted security - if this tendency continues to grow and gather momentum. The historical experience shows that insecurity for the government brings monumental perturbations for ordinary population as well, and we all going to suffer if this threat will ravage our society. An only way for the rulers to secure themselves is to reestablish an access to timely and adequate medical help for everybody; to deconstruct the punitive health care; and to make sure that the medical data is not altered, not twisted, and not destroyed. And this can be done ONLY if all foreign firms and enterprises will be expelled from the Canadian medical domain.


CONCLUSIONS - 4


When my family doctor retired, an access to medical care was almost completely blocked for me in general. The government cynically used Covid pandemic for blocking an access not only for people like me, but for 15-20 percent of population as well, planning to get rid of conscious objectors and of so-called "social ballast". Using Covid pandemic as a pretext, the ruling elite introduced a policy of the pre-registered appointment for any laboratory test, which made possible to a) cut a considerable part of population from timely and necessary laboratory tests, and b) to redevelop methods of lab tests' sabotage so that now it is entirely government's affair: to release an objective true medical data, or to destroy any of genuine medical exam.


As the government established an online policy for any medical appointment, it is becoming harder and harder to book an appointment by a telephone call, and a number of opportunities to see just ANY doctor have shrink almost down to "0".


And because my access to medical (private and governmental) websites is constantly sabotaged, not only an appointment with a doctor, but also an appointment for a blood-urine test is becoming a hardship.


Most of the time, an access to Canadian (and Quebec) medical web sites is blocked for me (for additional information see book 8 of this chronicle: "Police Intimidation and Digital Terror" [(3) Systemic sabotage of phone line, Internet-access, and email services; innumerous disconnections of Internet and phone. Blockage of medical, educational, and other web sites. [Internet-Emails Sabotage 1997-2021.]).


For weeks (and, sometimes, for 1-2 months) I am disconnected from the most essential Quebec-Canadian web resources, not been able to access my laboratory tests, to book a medical appointment, or to book an appointment for a blood-urine test. I am using the updated and adequate web browsers, and there should be no problems with browsing and accessing the web resources from the technical point of view. There no problems with my computer systems, or with anything else that would limit or restrict my access to medical web sites. My browsers' configuration is common, like browsers of other Internet-users. Thus, my difficulties could be explained exclusively by politically-motivated persecutions, especially that there are also some indirect indications of this. For example, when, in April 2023, I accessed the mapquest website, it displayed the view of my last request back in 2015: a part of Glen site environments' map. However, since after 2015, I have another computer, another modem, another Internet-provider, another IP-address, and so on. There are no any non-system (personal) files in my "net" computer; no anything that could expose my identity. There are no cookies or cash files, which would be left after accessing web pages with my personal data; no passwords: nothing that could betray my identity to web sites. Besides, I am sitting behind a rooter wall, and my "net" computer is connected to the rooter and the modem by a wired connection, which does not allow intruders to see wireless avatars of other Internet-users around me, and, consequently, to calculate my exact location, my exact address, and my exact identity. Until Rogers' intentions to buy Videotrone, web sites like webquest could not crack my identity; the caller-ID function was not disconnected from my phone line; my phone-Internet connection never suffered from frequent disconnections (as before 2016); and I had NO problems with my current Internet provider.


During 2016 - 3 November 2022 period, I had only once a problem with my present Internet-provider, and, after my report of the problem, they immediately intervened, and the problem was operationally solved in hours. NOW I and my daughter - we contacted my Internet-phone provider few times, reporting multiple problems (from disconnection of the caller-ID function, to frequent disconnection from educational and medical web resources), but they never called back.


I believe that my access to Quebec-Canadian web resources is blocked on both levels: on the level of the medical web sites, and on the level of the technical facilities, which stay higher than my Internet-provider. See below:


Not only my access is systematically blocked, but the data of my laboratory tests and other exams is systematically illegally delayed, blocked, or destroyed.


For example, in the beginning of January 2023, Dr. Poliquin administrated a blood and immune test, signing a corresponding requisition. However, only in March 2023 I managed to get an appointment for these tests.


Till mid-April, I either could not access my medical file online in general, or the data on ALL laboratory tests was blocked altogether: the icon for the lab tests was simply "missing"! Normally, there are must by 5 icons: Rendez-vous; Médicament; Imagerie médicale; Services médicaux; Prélèvement; but - till mid-April - the 5-th icon was just removed for me! (See below):


When, finally, I was allowed to access the Prélèvement link-index (the beginning of April 2023), these 2 tests on the same requisition (done in March 2023) were still unavailable. Only in mid-April the blood-test report appeared in my medical chart, but the immune test was always missing. The message was saying that the immune test must become accessible before the 13 of April 2023, but - in the end of April, - my access to this test was still blocked (see below):


Besides, the government's web site illegally compromised my personal email address, displaying it without my consent. I never entered my email address online into any of medical web pages.


When the governmental web site was blocking all my tests altogether by removing the icon-link of Prelevement (it appeared only on 12 Apr. 2023), I called to book a rendezvous with Dr. Poliquin (11 Apr. 2023). Verdun Hospital's attendant tried to help me, but, first, the telephone reception was unacceptably bad; another person's voice (a female voice) frequently interrupted our conversation; there was noise-clicking on the line; and for my already declined hearing it was an atrocity; and, thus, I could not communicate normally with the man, who answered my call. Secondly, he advised me to book an appointment with Dr. Poliquin, and to ask the doctor directly to make the immune test's copies available for me. However, this advice violated any logic, because it is a nonsense to advice someone, who is calling the right phone to book an appointment, to book an appointment! I told from the very beginning of the conversation that I need an appointment with Dr. Poliquin, and, in the end of our conversation (seconds before disconnecting), this person "advising" me to get an appointment!


I cannot explain that, and, consequently, I am not going to blame the person, who spoke with me, but one thing is abundantly clear: is that all (and any) medical appointments are presently blocked for me by the government. For example, before his retirement, Dr. Rohan told me that he is arranging my appointment with a surgeon (concerning a lesion on my neck), but 5 months later nobody contacted me (and, I am afraid: will never contact).

[10 minutes after writing about the inaccessibility of my appointment with the surgeon, I received a call from his office, and got an appointment on the next day. I don't believe in such "coincidences". In this chronicle, I presented dozens of similar examples, which suggest that not only my telephone conversations are tapped, but that everything that I am typing on the computer is registered and becomes known to those spies. There are few ways to know - what someone in typing on a computer, which never goes online: from spy-cameras' clandestine installation - to reading and decoding the electromagnetic oscillations in the electric circuit, or recording the keyboard noises and decoding them into a digital text.]

[Next day, 27 Apr. 2023, Thursday, I was seen by Dr. Carl Emond (in St.-Mary Hospital's Outpatients' Clinic at 37777 Jean Brillant).

Dr. Emond behaved hostile from the very moment he saw me. He started the conversation not from the nature of my health problem or problems, but from a question - what went wrong with Dr. Sebastian V. Demyttenaere: why I stopped visiting him, and came to see him, Dr. Emond, instead. In my opinion, it was a non-ethical attitude, and not an ethical beginning of conversation with patient.

I did not want to complain about Dr. V. Demyttenaere; especially, that he might be a good person; just I had a bad luck with him. So, I just said that I did not get along with Dr. Demyttenaere.

Then Dr. Emond said that he's assessment is just a "second opinion", and I understood it as his unwillingness to help me.

I showed him the lesion on my right shoulder (bordering neck), the cyst on my back, and a cyst or infiltrate on my forehead, which, after many years, started to accumulate again, and told the doctor that I want all 3 to be removed.

Dr. Emond denied me surgical help, saying only that the cyst on my shoulder is "too small".

He administrated a new ultrasound, which is "0", nothing.

In the same way, doctors just played for time before the lesion on my forehead calcified, disfiguring my face forever, and not only disfiguring my face, but also making my right eye smaller, and causing other complications as well.

I must stress that it is too early to form an opinion about Dr. Carl Emond. He can be a good doctor and good man. Some old men hide their compassion and their good intentions behind a surface harshness, or even hostility.

However, my visit to him left an unpleasant aftertaste.

Maybe, I don't understand or don't know something, but all doctors, whom I visited in the past concerning cysts and other lesions, at least, looked at them and touched them, but Dr. Emond even not stand up, and continued sitting. It was an impression that he squeamish about touching me for some reason: more likely, because of my socioeconomic status, or because he was really hostile, and planned to do nothing about my problems.

From the very beginning, I told him that I have an impair hearing, but he started to speak even more in low tones. When I repeated that I can not hear well, and asked to speak a bit louder, Dr. Emond responded with an irritation: "Can you speak English - at least!?". Even if I would not speak English adequately, it can be interpreted as an insult and a discriminative remark, but, taking into consideration that I speak English almost like my mother-tongue, such a remark is even stranger. But, I repeat, it is too early to form an opinion, and Dr. Emond might mean something completely different, having some other considerations on mind.

When I asked Dr. Emond - why he did not give me a requisition for ultrasound, he said: "You'll be called". However, my negative experience with doctors includes 2 episodes, when doctors said that they administrate exams (CT-scan; ultrasound), but later it cleared up that they administrated nothing, and just deceived me.

Thus, the future will show if Dr. Emond is a good doctor and a good man, or he has just bad intentions.

Now, I must remind - what happened with Dr. Demyttenaere.


6 Oct. 2021, Wednesday

Around 10:45 I was seen by the surgeon - Dr. Sebastian Demitteneran (or Sebastian V. Demyttenaere) [St.-Mary's Out Patients Clinic; 3777 Jean-Brilliant, room 14], to whom I was referred by Dr. Rohan.

Dr. Demyttenaere appeared to be a nice young man, very polite and sympathetic, and, it looked like there was a mutual sympathy between us.

Dr. Demyttenaere was willingly ready to remove the cyst (on the old scar) from my back, which caused so many problems for last 10 years, but I complained about another cyst (or a tumor), on my right lower neck - high shoulder, which I considered now more menacing.

He administrated an ultrasound, and told me to book an appointment as soon as the ultrasound report is ready.


2 Dec. 2021

Dr. Rohan had to see me at 10:00 in person in his office, instead of calling by phone, because he needed to see my dermatological problems (and cysts) himself; otherwise doctors-specialists did not want to deal with a new patient.

And because Dr. Demyttenaere did not expressed any opinion about the lesion on my shoulder, waiting for ultrasound's results, Dr. Rohan has assessed this problem as well, telling that it is not a lipoma, and not a tumor (as I suggested), but a cyst. The next ultrasound (late 2022) suggested a tumor, so, Dr. Rohan might be wrong. In Dr. Rohan's opinion, this lesion will disappear by itself. However, like Dr. Beatrice Wang, and 4 other doctors, who suggested the same about other lesions, and were mistaken, he was wrong, too.


15 Dec. 2021

Dr. Demiteneren [Sebastian V. Demyttenaere] (St.-Mary's Hospital's outpatient clinic's surgeon - room 14) was supposed to see me at 8:30, but another - a new - conflict has developed at the entrance of the medical pavilion at 3777 rue Jean-Brillant.

The security guard - a high black guy - demanded to replace my anti-Covid mask with provided by him hospital mask.


I said that I have no confidence in the hospital mask, and that my mask is brand-new, and I did not remove or lowered it before coming to the hospital.

However, this guard (a 32-34 y.o. man) did not want to listen.

Then I said that I'm going to replace the mask, which I am wearing, by another - new - mask from a brand-new (sealed!) pack in the original packing, which I have with me.

However, the guard was stone-stubborn, insisting on the formality no matter what.

No argument (that, for example, he is giving me a mask without the cover, which is not sterile anymore, while I want to pick up a mask from a new sterile pack) were accepted by him.

Finally, I said that I am leaving, and that all the consequences and the damage to my health caused by the blocked access to the doctor will be on this cruel and tyrannical practice of illogical twisted mask policy.

In that moment, one of the white nurses that stood near the second - internal - door, also serving as guards of the mask policy, has approached me, and told that - OK - I can enter the clinic, but I must, firstly, to change the mask that I am wearing to a new mask, which I have with me, and, secondly, to put the hospital mask on top of my own new mask.

I agreed to her conditions, and complied, being allowed to enter the clinic.

However, inside, after passing 2 secretaries and registering my visit, I was approached by a woman, who started to ask me weird questions, and behaved like a policeman. Then another woman in the white gown approached me with similar wild questions.

It is very likely that the 2 women were a team of the governmental servants (doctors or social workers, or etc.), whose function is to enforce the pathologization of decent and to crash any resistance to all neo-totalitarian tendencies.

When I, finally, entered the room number 14 (not really a room, not really an office, but a segregated by glass walls cube), Dr. Demiteneren [Sebastian V. Demyttenaere] was not alone, but with a young-looking woman in civil clothing, and in a Muslim shawl on her head. There was no identification card on her.

I asked Dr. Demiteneren [Sebastian V. Demyttenaere] if she is not a policewoman, a psychiatrist, or a social worker, explaining that - before seeing him, - I had a conflict with the guard, and, in such occasions, they use the practice of pathologization of any disagreement with governmental agents or the governmental policy.

The woman was very confused, but Dr. Demyttenaere has comforted her, stepping right to her and surprisingly frivolously supported her by rubbing her back (or by some other movement: I don't remember exactly), and declared that she is a trainee (an intern), and belongs to the same medical domain as he himself.

However, the young women became even more confused, and no sign confirmed that he was telling the truth. On the contrary, her reaction would provoke a suspicion in anyone that she is a good person, who is feeling the pangs of remorse because forced to do something that contradicts her code of ethics.

When I asked her (through Dr. Demyttenaere) - what she things about my problem, she became even more tangled, not able to say anything, and surely knowing nothing about my case.

Then I asked if she has an identification card or in ID, which proves that she's a surgeon, Dr. Demyttenaere did not let her to speak, and, again, rejected my insinuations as completely groundless. The young women, in her turn, has made an attempt to leave this small glass cube (called "room number 14"), but Dr. Demyttenaere comforted her again, did not let her to do anything, and - again - rejected my demands.

And, finally, I said that I am against the presence of other people in the room during the appointment with Dr. Demyttenaere, but he just ignored my declaration.

After the development of the above mentioned ethical conflict - I did not want to speak with Dr. Demyttenaere anymore. He violated the basic rights of a patient, first, by not asking patient's consent (allowance) for the presence of strangers (of extraneous persons) during the appointment; secondly, by not providing a clear identification of the person, who was present in the room; and, thirdly, when I disagreed with the presence of the intern (or whoever she was), he, still, ignored my declaration of non-consent.

I did not leave the "cube" right away just for seeing - what will happen then; and Dr. Demyttenaere did not assessed me, did not even asked me to remove my winter jacket; he only said that he finds the removal of the lesion on my lower right neck (higher shoulder) unnecessary, and that's all. When I asked him about the nature of the lesion - concretizing my question by asking if it is a cyst, a lipoma, or a tumor, - he could say nothing. I just asked him if he really saw the ultrasound's report, and he said affirmatively. However, I doubt it, if for no other reasons then for the ultrasound's report's date (by then, only a preliminary report was ready).

Dr. Demyttenaere's primary obligation was - at least - to diagnose the nature of the lesion by physically assessing it, but he did nothing.

If he was perplexed by my disagreement to have another person in the "room" - then he had 3 options: 1) to send the intern away; 2) to clear up her identity, by showing her ID card or a student card (if she was a student; because she looked a bit older than an overage student); or 3) to administrate another appointment. However, he did nothing.

Thus, Dr. Demyttenaere might be a good person and a good doctor, but he must be ready for any situation, and to defend the rights of a patient, but, unfortunately, he did the opposite...

And now, instead of friendly Dr. Demyttenaere, I was facing a hostile Dr. Emond, and the System don't open any solutions to my health problems again...

Concluding about my visit to Dr. Emond, I must stress that it was even worse than a refusal of the appointment with a doctor; or, putting it differently, a "double refusal".]


[A removal of the small cyst and infiltrate on my forehead had to be a very minor, very quick, and very inexpensive surgical procedure, but it was cruelly denied, and provoked major complications: calcification with the formation of a big cone-knob, which disfigured my face, and caused a number of other significant complications.

A removal of the small cyst on my back had to be a very minor, very quick, and very inexpensive surgical procedure, but it was cruelly denied, and provoked major complications: a life-threatening abscess, and - later - 2 more episodes of inflammation and abscesses; courses of antibiotics; extremely painful surgery; and 6 months of healing; 10 times bigger public health system's resources; lot of doctor's time; and so on.

If these moral freaks did not deny 2 very miniscule surgical procedures, I would not have my forehead disfigured, would not suffer from 2 major abscesses, and would not strained the public health care resources.

Now, the same repeats 12-th time in a row during last 20 years, and I am - again! - denied the removal of the cyst on my back, the tumor on my shoulder, and the accumulating (again) infiltrate on my forehead.

What a sadistic, torturous SYSTEM!]


Regarding a major deterioration of my vision (see: sabotage of music works), I called 2 times since 4 Apr. 2023 to the eye-clinic, demanding an urgent appointment with my ophthalmologist, but my appeals were completely ignored: no one contacted me. If I had a significantly high IOP, I could become already blind. This is how the medical "justice" is working in Quebec.


My appointments with a urologist, and with other doctors - are blocked altogether.


In my old age, and in my health situation - totally cutting an access to medical help is the same as an assassination attempt.


This is the sad reality that we all are facing, but people like me are in a worse situation than anybody else.


___________


Lev Gunin


THE PUNITIVE HEALTH CARE

[HEALTH CARE AS A REPRESSIVE TOOL]


BOOK 8


THE POLICE AND DIGITAL TERROR.


THE CONTENT OF MY CASE:

1. Politically-motivated police intimidation (hundreds of stoppings, interrogations, interceptions, escorts by police; police surveillance, escorting to medical institutions), and the refusal of an investigation and of a written response to my complaints.

2. Canadian media (TV, radio, newspapers, etc.), human rights organizations, and other recipients of my declaration ignored my letters about the police intimidation, - and never replied.

3. Systemic sabotage of my Internet-access and the email service; innumerous disconnections of my Internet and my phone. [Internet-Emails Sabotage 1997-2021.]

4. Medical crimes, discrimination and persecution in the medical institutions, and police escorts to medical facilities. [The Punitive Health Care as a Repressive Tool.]

5. Provocations, attacks, property damage, beatings, etc. [As part of points 1,2, 3, 4, and 6.]

6. Violations of my voter"s rights (removal from voters" lists in the provincial elections).

__________


* * *


The whole text of the chronological events and medical documents (under the name of "The Punitive Health Care - (Health Care as a Repressive Tool)" is available for examination only on the basis of the following contract between the author and the reader:


I (THE READER) GIVE MY CONSENT THAT, BY CLICKING CORRESPONDING LINKS AND ACCESSING THE TEXT OF "THE PUNITIVE HEALTH CARE", I AUTOMATICALLY AGREE TO THE FOLLOWING PRELIMINARY CONDITIONS [FOR READING]:


-- I am (at least) 18 years old.


1. I (the reader) is undertaking (commit myself) not to distribute the text of "The Punitive Health Care - (Health Care as a Repressive Tool)" - entirely, or in fragments; not to copy medical documents; and not to share the text and images without author' permission.


2. I (the reader) understand that the confidential information, which is contained in this text, cannot be used for any other [than the reading (extraneous; secondary)] purposes and needs, for any researches, essays, stories, etc.


3. I (the reader) commit myself not to sneer at open ticklish personal information (which sharing was induced by circumstances), not to savor any medical, physiological, or anatomic details, and not to use this text as a reason for mockery and persecution.


4. I (the reader) am warned by the author that, except for a number of obviously immoral (by definition) doctors' and medical staff's actions, other decisions and acts described in this "confession" are not subjected to hasty moral assessment because a) only experts can judge finally about their justification and fairness; b) explanations and vindications of other party are necessary. We also do not know to what degree the doctors were under an influence and direct power of police, Ministry of Immigration, and other enforcement agencies, political organizations, groups and persons - with their own ideological, economic, and propaganda interests, - and to what degree this influence impacted on their diagnostic conclusions and assessments of patient's state of health. Many of the documentary confirmed facts incontestably demonstrate that author's ideological stand (who's opposing to younger generation's transformation into zombie-biorobots with mobile phones on shoulders instead of heads; to electronic totalitarianism with its prison-like total video surveillance; and to the tyrannical political censorship) played nearly a major role in enraging the authorities and triggering the persecutions.


5. I (the reader) am warned that the author sees the main cause of the most dramatic (for him) events in the fact that the enforcement agencies and interested persons and groups managed to present him to the medical community as an individual incapable to evaluate his health condition objectively; as a health-consciousan (or hypochondriac); an extremist; a troublemaker; an individual obsessed with panic and alarm patterns; as a person, who is making unreal demands to the system of medical care - concerning his - allegedly - pseudo-maladies and exaggerated gravity of trivial indispositions. This smear campaign of defamation, scurrilous libel, and wicked calumny made impossible receiving an adequate medical care (and sometimes any medical help at all), and led to health undermining, numerous diseases, incidents, and unnecessary sufferings. Doctors also considered difficult to believe in continuous (not connected with each other) illnesses, with an interval of 4-7 days, sometimes rolling at the same time: as tsunami. They refused to believe in these sequences of illnesses' painful course, danger, and significance. This chronicle disproves such a prejudiced opinion, producing an incontestable evidence.


6. I (the reader) am informed that all negative remarks, characteristics, and facts' assessments belong only to the portrayal of criminal groups, extremists, and carriers of anti-humanistic, racist, and totalitarian ideology, but do not contain groundless generalizations and negative assessment of any country, ethnic group, or religion. The author is categorically against dismantling of any of the existing states, and against restrictions of the rights of religious congregations of any faith.


7. I (the reader) am informed that this edition partially presents the previous 2017 edition without any changes, and, thus, may not correspond to later view and opinions.


8. I (the English reader) am informed that some parts of the following English text of "The Punitive Health Care" - were translated from Polish, Russian, or French originals, and may contain primitive language, double interpretation, or puzzled meaning. Such confusing fragments should be compared with their originals in Polish and Russian languages (author's native languages) [2016-2017]; all controversial points must be resolved through such a comparison.


9. In the very last moment of this edition's make-up (April 2023), the author came across a description of so-called Havana-syndrome, and found same symptoms and complications, which he experienced when was attacked by an unknown remote weapon (3 Nov. 2005, 7 Jan. 2013, and 21 June 2016), and developed symptoms of post-microwave irradiation.


_________


THE CASE OF POLITICALLY MOTIVATED

PERSECUTIONS IN 6 PARTS


THE CONTENT OF MY CASE:

1. Politically-motivated police intimidation (hundreds of stoppings, interrogations, interceptions, escorts by police; police surveillance, escorting to medical institutions), and the refusal of an investigation and of a written response to my complaints.

2. Canadian media (TV, radio, newspapers, etc.), human rights organizations, and other recipients of my declaration ignored my letters about the police intimidation, - and never replied.

3. Systemic sabotage of my Internet-access and the email service; innumerous disconnections of my Internet and my phone. [Internet-Emails Sabotage 1997-2021.]

4. Medical crimes, discrimination and persecution in the medical institutions, and police escorts to medical facilities. [The Punitive Health Care as a Repressive Tool.]

5. Provocations, attacks, property damage, beatings, etc. [As part of points 1,2, 3, 4, and 6.]

6. Violations of my voter"s rights (removal from voters" lists in the provincial elections).


(GENERAL) PART 1


1.

Politically-motivated police intimidation (hundreds of stoppings, interrogations, interceptions, escorts by police; police surveillance, escorting to medical institutions), and the refusal of an investigation and of a written response to my complaints.


I admit (in my Declaration to police) that I did not complaint to police till 2019.


However, in 2007-2010, and later, in 2018-2020, I contacted (by phone, email, and fax) hundreds of newspapers, and other media resources, human rights organizations and aide juridique, but never received any reply or help.


Since 2008, I was also maintaining a web chronicle in Russian, adding every event of interaction with police chronologically, and providing a very exact, precise, punctual, and detailed description with photos. It is incomplete (till 2012). I was publishing it on 3 web-sited, one of which is: http://www.balandin.net/Gunin/chrono-police-00.htm.


Additionally, I created a series of articles, combining the police and the medical cases, which is also accessible on Internet. So, I did not start reporting the police intimidations only in 2019, and was complaining since 2008, but nobody listened...


2.


From 2006 to 2015, police stopped, intercepted, interrogated, or searched me more than 100 times.


Since 2019, I submitted few declarations to 3 police departments, demanding answers: why I was intimidated and persecuted by police in 2006-2014.


On 23 Aug. 2019, 2 police officers visited me at home; we had a conversation in French. One of the officers (M-me Hamel) has left her personal ID card. They admitted that my report about systematic persecutions by police is trustable and adequately describes the real events, but said that all traces about interceptions, stoppings, interrogations by police - and even about illegal fines! - have been erased from the police database. However, 2 police officers did not explain, why I did not receive a response in writing (as I demanded). I repeated my demand to M-me Hamel that I want to receive a letter in writing, concerning my declaration, but never got a written explanation from the police also after her visit.


Trying to find answers, I appealed for a legal aid lawyer, but legal aid was also denied to me.


I admitted (in my Declaration to police) that I did not complaint to police till 2019. However, mentioning some of the reasons, I did not mention other reasons, like the loss of trust in Canadian judicial system, which was subverted to fundamental changes (after 2001), and now is re-designed to protect exclusively the ruling elite and its lackeys; and the role of never-reclaimed fines, which confirmation I waited till 2019 (to contest them in court), but the payments have been never demanded.


This is true that I did not complain to police directly till 2019, but in 2007-2010, and later, in 2018-2020, I contacted (by phone, email, and fax) hundreds of Canadian newspapers, and other media resources, human rights organizations, but never received any reply or help.


I have a confirmation of all facts, including my appeal to police and the visit of two police officers; my appeal for aide juridique; and the submission of hundreds of my messages to Canadian newspapers.


All facts described above are undermining Canadian democracy, making it ghostly.


Here (below) are few of the selected (from hundreds of others) images, which constitute a material evidence (see below):


1). Fax to Police - Poste de quartier numéro 15 (3 images):


2). Two police officers' visit 23 Aug. 2029 concerning my complaint (1 image):


3). 1 of 4 illegal fines:


[a comment: I was not riding a bicycle on a sidewalk; instead, I was walking and pushing my bicycle beside me]


4). Some of my reports to hundreds of Canadian newspapers [I had to use non-Canadian maul server, because my Canadian emails server blocked ALL my messages to the media] (see below):


5). An access to legal aid was denied: confirmation of my communication with Maitre Edith Legault; her email address (written by herself in her legal aid office at rue de Maisonneuve (during an interview); and her email to me [Maitre Lagault tried very hard to obtain legal aid for me, but it was not approved (refused)] (see below):


Till 2016, my telephone line and Internet used to be disconnected sometimes for days or even weeks.


Depriving someone of phone / Internet / email access in our digital era is equal to a house arrest, which constitutes a very serious human rights abuse. It is causing the same isolation from the outside world. Systematic disconnections of my phone line and Internet during more than 20 years caused irreparable damage to me and my family members. Inability to contact close family members, cousins, and other relatives; difficulties for our children to study and work; unsolved heath issues (because of inability to consult the Web): are just few matters among hundreds.


The whole gamma of provocations, administrative pressure was used against me by several governmental agencies (like an incorrect tax report proceeding; stoppings of payments; refusals of allocation; etc.), by BELL communication company, and so on.


The intensification of oppression since November 2022 was, probably, caused by the growing intolerance towards the conscious objectors. When violence, aggression, domination, slavery, and rage become the deities of the modern rulers on the global scale, people like me, whose philosophy and ideology are based on peace, non-violence, and truth-search, become targets of the monsters.


Since my birthday (3 Nov.), provocations, police surveillance, sabotage, and other intimidating actions against me have intensified to the scale of 2013-2014.


My official (payable!) email service [ca-inter-net] began again to sabotage all non-English characters in my email postbox. All Polish, Ukrainian, Belorussian, Russian, German, French letters become ??? signs on the list of incoming emails, inside the text of the incoming emails, and within my emails sent to my correspondents. All my email messages become abracadabra. In the same time, I am cut off the technical support (ca-inter-net sabotage my complaints and the access to technical support). I switched to another company years ago, but I have no choice but to keep my official email box at ca-inter-net.


Since abandoning ca-inter-net, and switching to another Telephone-Internet provider, I did not have any problems during 7 years (like systematic disconnections of my phone line and Internet (sometimes for weeks!); intolerantly slow Internet speed; vicious computer viruses' attacks directed from ca-inter-net server; sabotage of my emails; etc.), but - since the day of my birthday - some problems have started to accumulate again. In last 5 months, Telephone-Internet was down 3 times for 5-6 hours. The ID-caller stopped working. I am cut off the International lines, and not able to call my relatives in Germany and Poland. However, the isolation from the distant calls' network could happen on a higher level than our Telephone-Internet provider.


The last is confirmed by the fact that the ominous company Rogers (not less ominous than Bell), which becomes in Canada the same monopolist as Bell, is going to buy the local Quebec company Videotrone, which services we use. The problems with our Internet and phone began then when the first messages about Rogers' intention began to surface. Problems started also with other services, which also foreign firms intend to buy. It means that - while we used the services of the local Quebec companies - everything was as it should be, and - for 7 years - we were freed from the spiteful mockery, but - as soon as we got into hands of foreign firms (or non-Quebec Canadian companies), the former politically motivated prosecutions at once restarted.


This fact, in turn, confirms all my former guesses (about the one, whom exactly I have to "thank" for the fact that my life was broken and that I am exposed to the ceaseless abuse and scoff), which I hinted in this extensive chronicle.


It is not a coincidence that - simultaneously with the disconnection of the display ID-caller function - a malicious campaign of systematic anonymous calls has restarted after 5-6 years of calm. Since November 3, 2022 (my birthday!), I receive 3-4 or 5-6 anonymous calls per day, not being able to see the phone number of the caller. Obviously, one of the most probable goals of the callers is to knock me out of balance (to play on my nerves), but these systematic anonymous calls can also serve a purpose of verification if I am at home; of an analysis of my mood, physical and psychological condition; etc. (?). They can simply check my hearing and reacting capabilities for possible future provocations; or collect samples of my - allegedly - "inadequate" responses or reactions (skillfully setting up special particular situations for staged replies): for a future smear campaign. For example, 13 Apr. 2023, a young Brute has played a role of a vendor - who is calling about a delivery of some mattresses, while distorting his voice by noises, signals, and music: clearly mocking at me and hiding his scoffing sneer. A functional ID-caller would give some general ideas about this months-long provocation, but it was shut down by the Internet-Telephone provider. I called few times; my daughter called them; they promised to call back - and NEVER called back.


DECLARATION IN 6 PARTS


To Police D Department


From Lev Gunin (leog@total.net)


Between 2006 and 2015, I was stopped and interrogated (or followed; escorted; fined; confronted; intercepted) by police more than 100 times. Typically, I was told that the policemen have "received a signal". In the same period, I was under demonstrative or slightly camouflaged police-security surveillance.


On 21 Aug. 2019, I sent a fax (in English) to Montréal Police Poste Cartier 15, asking for answers. I demanded a response in writing, explaining that due to hearing loss and other health issues I am not fitting for any verbal conversation.


23 Aug. 2019, 2 police officers visited me at home; we had a conversation in French. I was satisfied by their politeness, constructive approach, and responses, but (again) demanded an answer in writing. Besides, not all my questions were clarified. One of the officers (M-me Hamel) has left her card.


18 Sep. 2019, I sent another fax (in French) to Montréal Police Poste Cartier 15 (CC: M-me J. Hamel), with my new request about a written response. In my fax, retelling the conversation with the policeman and the policewoman, I asked to confirm if I heard and understood everything correctly; I also made few important remarks. For example, I stressed that, if M-me Hamel did not find any data regarding the above-mentioned events from 2006 to 2015, does it mean that the data on ungrounded and illegal fines was also lost?


I received no response from the police.


I would like to know, what this mean from the legal perspective. Were my rights (to receive feasible information in writing [on why I was under police surveillance and was stopped and interrogated [etc.] more than 100 times]) violated, or the police can just ignore my demands?


Copies of my communication with the police are attached.


Sincerely,

Lev Gunin.

À Poste de quartier 15

1625, avenue de l"Église

Montréal H4E 1G6

Téléphone : 514-280-0115

Télécopieur :514-280-0615

De: Lev GUNIN,

[................... removed for security reasons ................]


REPORT

From 2006 to 2015, I was escorted; or stopped and interrogated; or confronted; or followed; or called (from police cars); or interrogated and searched; or interrogated and escorted; or blocked; or stopped and fined without reason by police - more than 100 times.


This count does not include acts of demonstrative-intimidating surveillance.


This experience had a negative effect on my health.


There are several reasons, why I never complained: I am a police's sympathizer; I felt uneasy to file a complain, because all police officers (who used to stop me) were nice and polite people; and because I appreciate police"s efforts, which made Montreal a safe city.


However, now I am looking for answers, expecting a semi-informal friendly inquiry, rather than any comprehensive investigation.


My requests are very simple:


1) Who and why initiated police"s actions like stopping and interrogating me?

2) What were the reasons for police to approach me more then 100 times?

3) Why such actions did not stop, when it became obvious to police that I am a peaceful, harmless, aged, and law-obeying citizen?

4) The police officers used to tell me that they stopped me because they "received a signal" with my visual and behavioral description. Who or what inside or outside the police used to send such "signals"?

5) Why I was never approached by police before 2006 (in exclusion of an event in May 2005) and after 2015, and what changed the policy towards me in 2006 - 2015?

6) Am I presently (or was after 2015; or recently) under police"s or another enforcement agency"s surveillance, and, if so, why?

I request a written response in a mail to my postal address in English or French.

And, finally, I attach (below) a short description of the most typical examples of being stopped and interrogated by police.


1. In 2011, I was stopped by a single police officer in a patrol car, allegedly, after "a signal" (which included a perfect description of me) from Dépanneur on St.-Jacques. When I"ve insisted on questioning the Dépanneur staff, the police officer has advised me to do it myself. I went there, found no graffiti on Dépanneur"s walls, entered inside, and was told by the staff that no one called the police.

2. In 2012, I was stopped and interrogated by police, in connection with a "signal that someone did an attempt to break into a car". Again, the policemen have received a perfect description of me. On my request, 2 police officers tried to find more details about the "signal", but it looked that no one called 911 reporting an incident mentioned by it.

The question is, if no one called 911 from Dépanneur on St.-Jacques, then who did? If no "good citizen" has averted police about alleged attempt to break into a car, then who? Who were the people from outside or from inside the police behind such "signals"? What was the reason and purpose for them to manipulate police sending policemen after me?

In some periods, typically, surveillance used to start right after I exit from my home.


Cases type 1: a patrol car appears near home and (often the same car) when I return back.

Examples: July 23, 2010, evening - police car 15-3 (stopping-questioning near home included);

September 26, 2010, 14.00 and before - police car 76-45 (?); December 2010 police cars 15-4,

15-86, 20-12, 72-86, 21-14, 21-15, etc.; April 14 (early morning) and 15, 2011 - police cars 15-

12 and 15-2; May 25, 2011 (evening); June 7, 2011 (evening, around 23.00) patrol car 15-1; June

18, 2011 (midday) - police cars 15-4 & 15-9, and around 11 other police cars + motorcycle (not near home); April 14, 15, 2011 patrol car 15-12. These are just selected examples from innumerous others. (More recent examples: Apr. 24, 2013 (evening) - police car 15-2; Dec. 4, 2013 (morning) police car 15-8; Dec. 28, 2013 (midnight) - 15-2, 15-14; etc.).


Cases type 2: police cars (normally from 1 to 3 or 5 per walk) intercepted me at key points: bridges, main intersections, bus or metro stations, extreme proximity of my usual motion walks, destinations (medical facility, store, friend"s home, etc.). Examples: April 7, 2012 (morning) - police car 70-47; July 4, 2012 (day) - 71-6, and 2 other police cars; September 9, 2012 (early morning) police car 15-0; April 19, 2013 (evening) - police car 15-12; April 21, 2013 (midday) - police car 15-1; and innumerous others.


What, if in some cases police officers in the patrol cars eventually did not know me, did not follow me, and did not even notice my presence. Their cars" rout might be manipulated by a dispatcher or police"s desk clerk so that they always unnoticeably cross my way. Or, for example, someone was watching my movements through the surveillance cameras mounted on some police cars.


Cases type 3: On my slightest attempt to evade surveillance, punitive measures were immediately employed: blockage of my way, demonstrative escorting, or interrogation.

Here are few most typical examples.


On April 28, 2007 (morning), police cars 15-6 and 15-... were escorting me to the bus station, and later followed the bus together with STM car 88-091. STM car 88-091 stopped the bus; the inspector has climbed onboard the bus, and inspected me and my seat. During this procedure, police car 15-... was nearby, watching.


On April 5, 2008 (morning), 3 police cars escorted me on distance, with an STM car 88-090. A young women-inspector from 88-090 STM climbed up into the bus, and "inspected" me and my bag. Police cars watched from distance. Later, same day, the same lady, recognizable by voice, called by radio another bus"s driver, and the driver has stopped the bus, and "inspected" me on her request.

On August 1, 2008 (day), I was stopped by Westmount Security car, and questioned by 2 security officers, male and female. During interrogation, I was told that I am "not welcomed" in Westmount. At that time, I was simply walking along Sherbrook near Green, like any other pedestrian.


On April 28, 2009 (day), I was stopped and questioned by police car 12-... near Sherbrook-

Atwater. I was picked up by policemen when was simply waiting for green light to cross.


On April 26, 2010 (evening), I was stopped by police car 20-1 near Westmount, and questioned for absolutely no reason. No explanations were given by police.


On February 28, 2011 (around 18.15), I was stopped by police car 15-4 near canal Lachine, and questioned. On my request, police officers refused to give any reason.


On April 26, 2011 (late night), I was stopped by police car 12-16 (exactly on the border with

Westmount), interrogated for more than 40 minutes, searched, and fined. The pretext was that I, allegedly, went on bike to the pavement. However, when I was stopped, I was walking on foot, pushing my bike beside me. Before approaching the intersection, I was also walking uphill on foot, pushing my bike beside. I had no good bike and not enough physical strength to go up under the bridge on bicycle. When I mentioned this to police officers, they agreed that I am right, but did not discharge the fine.


On March 15, 2011 (day), I was stopped and questioned by 2 policemen on foot. They did not explain why I was stopped.


On May 1, 2011 (day), I was stopped by police car 15-12, and interrogated. No reason was given by the policemen.


On May 9, 2011 (day), I was stopped and interrogated by 2 policemen on foot near canal

Lachine. When I asked what"s wrong, I was told that this is just a routine questioning.


July 26, 2011 (between 10.00 and 11.00): 2 young policewomen on bikes stopped and questioned me for no reason.


March 14, 2012 (early evening): restrain and interrogation by policemen on foot. He pretended that I, allegedly, made photos of the tobacco factory, which was not true.


On July 2, 2012 (after 23.00), I was stopped and questioned by 2 policewomen in patrol car 15-

13. They were accusing me that I was, allegedly, visiting a bordello in a private house somewhere around rue Chateauguay, which was ridiculous. At first, I took it for a joke.


On July 16, 2012 (after 16.00), I was stopped and interrogated for 30 minutes by 2 policemen from patrol car 23-8. They told me that received a "signal" from a store about a person who was spraying graffiti on the wall. On my request, the policemen contacted the store by phone, and were told that no one called police from the store.


On May 28, 2012 (around 23.00), I was stopped and interrogated by policemen from a patrol car

20-1. They told me that stopped me because received a "signal".


On October 1, 2012 (around 10.00), while shopping with my wife, I was stopped and interrogated by an officer of private police, which later communicated with 2 policewomen from police car 15-3. No reason for his interest toward my person was given.


On October 5, 2012 (around 13.00), while shopping with my wife, I was stopped and questioned by 2 policewomen from patrol car 14-03. No explanations were given.


October 17, 2012 (around 00.15): I was stopped, identified, interrogated, and escorted by a police officer in a patrol car 15-8 or 15-86. He pretended that stopped and interrogated me for making a sudden turn and going back (towards the police car!). 10 minutes before, the same patrol car (2 blocks from where I"ve been) suddenly stopped, cutting its turning maneuver and started to circle on an intersection without even seeing me. I suggested that possibly a driver of a taxi that obsessively and demonstratively followed me before that moment, was in contact with the police car 15-8 or 15-86, and reported about my presence and movement. Seeing from where I could not be seen such strange patrol car maneuvers, I felt stressful, and decided to return home as soon as possible (police"s confrontation is stressful for a person of my age regardless officers" politeness). However, the car 15-8 (86?) started to move into my direction, quickly run me down, and escorted to a nearest corner. I was stopped, identified, and interrogated for more then 20 minutes, and escorted home.


Cases type 4: Besides "normal" police cars, I was sometimes followed or even stopped by what I consider "fake" police cars. These are suspicious cars with unusual colors of board numbers, or a suspicious license plate, or car brand. If one day I see a "normal" police car (15-...), which is, say, Ford, with familiar police officers inside, and next day I meet same police car 15-..., which is a smaller Dodge or GM, and in 2 days later again the "normal" Ford, it sends fear into my heart.


Examples: I am sure that on January 13, 2015, it was a Chevrolet police 26-12 car on my way. However, on January 20, 2015, it was a Dodge patrol car 26-12. If necessary, I can provide other examples.


Cases type 5: Confrontations and interrogations by very serious security agencies with or without police"s participation.


May 19, 2014, carrying outside a bag with garbage for recycling after 1.00, I was stopped and interrogated by 2 private police officers near my home. Their car was parked on the other side of the street after the corner. That was a security car with big letter "V". Another police or private police car was waiting in the middle of the parallel street, just after my home. No reason for questioning was given.


May 22, 1914, around 1.10, I was stopped and interrogated by 2 police officers from the patrol car 15-1. This happened soon after I was intercepted (at the corner of Island and Centre) by a familiar-looking silver car with 2 individuals, whom I identified as personages, who may participate in camouflaged (cover-up) surveillance. Another car, a security car with a big round logo, very similar to RCMP logotype, watched from the distance.


And, indeed, in the middle of my way at rue Centre between Island and Laprairie, a slowly moving police car 15-1 appeared from behind, non-doubtfully looking after me. At the corner of rue Laprairie, I turned right, towards rue St.-Charles, and saw that the police car 15-1 is making a 180-turn. Obviously, till that very moment, nothing in me or in my behavior could look suspicious to police. There was absolutely no reason for police to rush after me and to stop me for interrogation.

Such cars with the letters "securite" and a solid emblem that reminds the RCMP"s logotype have intercepted me in key points, or watched from distance, while I was interrogated by police, or just suddenly appeared in suspicious circumstances several times. For example, such a car waited for me (I had such an impression) very close to my home on the 12 December, 2013. It was a Ford, with a license plate number EHF 8344. By its form, equipment and rareness, it must be a very serious agency. This car first went towards me, and then, having overtaken me at 23:55, it turned around, and, at a snail's pace, with my pedestrian speed, accompanied me to an intersection of a big street, just near my home. Having passed the intersection, the car stopped on the right side of the street (where I was), after the corner. Returning home, I was forced to pass it. There was a well-equipped "gendarme" in an indistinct uniform at the driver"s sit, and, beside him (in the passenger"s sit) - a black young female-"gendarme" at the computer. This computer was the same as in police cars: a built-in onboard special laptop.


In some periods of time, such security services have confronted me as often as the police.


Waiting for answers,

Lev Gunin.

Montreal, August, 2019.

......................

À Poste de quartier 15

1625, avenue de l"Église

Montréal H4E 1G6

Téléphone : 514-280-0115

Télécopieur :514-280-0615

CC: M-me J. Hamel.

De: Lev GUNIN,


[........ effacé pour des raisons de sécurité ........]


Je suis reconnaissant pour la visite personnelle des officiers de la police en réponse à ma déclaration. (La conversation avait lieu le vendredi 23 août 2019, avant et après 11 h, en français.)

Malheureusement, la conversation orale qualitative est difficile pour moi, en rapport avec les circonstances suivantes.


Après les épisodes de vertigo inexplicables (le 3 novembre 2005 ; le 7 janvier 2013 ; et le 21 juin 2016), accompagnés par la diarrhée, les vomissements, la leucocytose augmentée, une désorientation temporaire et une hémorragie nasale, et - plus tard - des maux de tête, l"aggravation de la rumeur (particulièrement après le 7 janvier 2013 et le 21 juin 2016) et la vue, et par les autres symptômes, ma rumeur a commencé à s'aggraver. Après l"épisode du 21 juin 2016, des difficultés (temporaire) de cours en ligne directe, de compréhension des paroles et de distinction des mots, de traitement rapide des chiffres, des mots et des faits de la mémoire à court terme, ainsi que d"autres problèmes, se sont ajoutés. Je n"ai reçu aucune assistance médicale en rapport avec l"épisode du 21 juin 2016.


Le médecin-oto-laryngologue m"a dit que, en rapport avec la particularité de mon cas individuel, l"appareil auditif ne m"aidera pas. Quand j"écoute la radio avec un casque d"écoute, l"amplification du son aide peu, parce qu"il est difficile pour moi de bien distinguer les mots. Je connais l"anglais depuis l"enfance, mais le français me semble plus approprié pour la perception sur la rumeur, et c"est pour cela que je préfère parfois le français et parfois l"anglais, selon le cas.


Parfois j"entends un peu mieux, mais même à telles périodes je ne suis pas toujours certain d"avoir entendu correctement et a compris certaines phrases.


Les problèmes de compréhension de la parole peuvent me mettre en situation délicate et embarrassante. Par conséquent, n"importe quels contacts avec les officiels doivent probablement être conduits par écrit dans mon cas.


C"est pourquoi la demande de m"envoyer une réponse écrite par la poste n"était pas accidentelle.

Donc, si j"ai entendu correctement et compris le message des officiers de la police, on me disait ce qui suit :


1) Aucune note sur le fait que j"ai été intercepté et interrogé par la police plus de 100 fois entre

2006 et 2015 ne se trouve dans la base de données de la police.

2) Le fait de s"informer auprès des policiers qui m"avaient intercepté et interrogé (ce qui pourrait être établi selon les données fournies par moi) ne donnera aucun résultat, puisqu"ils communiquent chaque jour avec beaucoup de gens et ne se rappelleront probablement pas de ce qui s"est passé il y a 14 ans ou même 5 ans.

3) Néanmoins, les cas présentés que j"ai décrits leur ont paru très vraisemblables, correspondant en effet à la pratique du travail policier et d"autres services, ainsi qu"à leur coordination.

4) Il n"existe aucune données sur le fait que j"ai été surveillé par la police ou sur le fait que la police me surveille encore actuellement.


Quelques autres questions concrètes ont également été examinées (notamment les voitures policières hypothétiquement fausses qui ont participé dans mon interception). La dame a dit que j"utilise incorrectement le mot " arrêter ", parce que ce terme signifie une arrestation par la police avec des menottes, et qu"il faut plutôt dire " intercepter ". Je ne suis pas sûr si cela concernait notre discussion en français ou ma déclaration en anglais aussi, et s"il était question de mon interception par la police avec un interrogatoire ou une interception sans interrogatoire.

Mme J. Hamel n"a pas répondu directement à ma question, à savoir si l"absence complète de quelques données que ce soit sur les interceptions et les interrogations de la police signifie qu"il manque également des notes sur le fait que j"ai été intercepté, interrogé, perquisitionné et mis sous amende par la police le 26 avril 2011, mais elle m"a demandé quand et comment les amendes étaient émises par la police, dans quelles circonstances, et combien ils étaient. Est-ce l"absence de cette réponse indirecte signifie que ces notes sont absentes aussi dans la base de données de la police ?


Pour ma part, j"ai compris de la conversation que madame J. Hamel s"est préparée de manière responsable à la conversation, ayant étudié soigneusement et méticuleusement ma déclaration et les circonstances y étant décrites. C"est pourquoi la possibilité de l"absence des notes sur l"amende mentionnée dans la base de données est très probable.


En résumé, je veux déclarer que je suis satisfait des réponses que j"ai reçues des officiers de police, que je suis reconnaissant pour leur tact et le travail soigneusement fait. Je n"ai aucune question supplémentaire.


Ma seule demande supplémentaire est la suivante : confirmer par écrit que j"ai entendu et compris exactement et correctement tout ce qui m"a été dit au cours de la conversation du 23 août 2019, et que je l"ai correctement décrit plus haut, et par le fait même, confirmer dans la lettre ce que les officiers de la police (particulièrement dans les points 1), 2), 3), 4) m"ont communiqué.


Si l"information liée à l"amende du 26 avril 2011 est effectivement absente dans la base de données, je demande de le confirmer séparément. Si, toutefois, une telle information s"y trouve, je demande s"il est possible de me renvoyer toutes les notes et données liées à cet épisode.

Mes salutations distinguées,

Lev Gunin.

.....................


Since 3 Nov. 2022, the general pressure, a wave of provocations, and police intimidations: everything returned altogether.


Here are just few of hundreds similar examples.


On my way to the Old City (19 Mar. 2023), I noticed 7 police cars in the distance, and their density was increasing closer to the Old City. If it was an intimidation, it means that someone did not want me in the Old City of Montreal. I also noticed a car with a familiar Nouv LR logo at the main key-point (under the bridge). I don't know about this particular car, but 2 other such cars were used to spy on me around my home, and at the exit from Metro. One of them (Nissan Rogue, metallic color) appeared on my way home from the computer store, which I described in this chronicle (see under 2003).

Then, very near the Old City, I noticed not exactly a police cruiser, but a car that belongs to the same department (w. Nissan SV 134 164 04, FPT5864).

This car was already known to me, and the woman-driver is also looked familiar.


At de la Commune Street I saw an Amazon bus; there are rumors that some of such buses are used for spying on dissidents. The bus was standing exactly in the area of the tragic arson in the Old City, close to du Port. There was also a police officer, and a black Chrysler car, such as often used for undercover police operations.


A police car 3-1 was placed behind this black Chrysler, and the second police car - a bit further, near the museum.


The police car 1-3 stopped me (intercepted) 2 times, and participated in police surveillance and intimidation 4 or 6 times (or, more likely, 2-3 times): for example, on 14-09-2013, at 12:50, in Cote-des-Neiges area. The police cruiser 30-8 is most likely carries a police supervisor.


When I decided to go down to the passage along the Old Port (to try to see something from there against rue du Port), I spotted a designated police ribbon that blocked the way. Just minutes ago I observed a woman running along the bicycle tray here, and now it was blocked: like it was closed just seconds ago for not allowing ME to pass.


The black police car 13-7, also familiar to me, was placed near the Boutique du Musee (read above).


Meanwhile, this sector of the Old City, with the burned building, produced a chilling impression on me, as in April, when I felt that something appalling is going to happen there. Some other-worldly emanation was flowing from the scene of the tragedy, deeply disturbing and depressing, sending a wave of an irresistibly overwhelming fear and profound sorrow. Even the knowledge and awareness that there - in the ruins - must lay dead bodies of the victims that died a terrible death: cannot explain that dreadful immaterial wind. I only read in books, and watched in films how the personages had the same chilling impulse on the scenes of the most awful crimes.


Another police car with the flash lights - 12-9 - was stationed near Pointe-à-Calière at d'Youville.


Three people were standing after the police cordon, near the West edge of the museum: probably, unfortunate relatives of the victims. Their figures were sending a chilling wave of grief and sorrow.


Coming back to de la Commune, I noticed that the police vehicle 3-1 was "covertly" replaced by another police car - 15-9, which now occupied the same parking spot. The fact that it was done while I was absent for a relatively short time, and that the both vehicles are very alike, provoke a suggestion that this particular car arrival has to do something with me. While the police car 3-1 was involved in only 2 incidents (when I was stopped and interrogated by police), the police cruiser 15-9 was involved in DOZENS of similar incidents, including demonstrative surveillance, escorts, stoppings, calls from this police car, etc. The police car 15-9 is one of 3 police vehicles, which most actively participated in interceptions, intimidation, and demonstrative surveillance.


While before the arrival of this car, the way to the site of the arson was blocked by merely a red cordon ribbon, a policewoman from the police car 15-9 enforced the blockage exactly when I came back to de la Commune.


When I approached the old fire-station at d'Youville, the police car (9-3) was standing on the pavement, beside a group of people: most likely, also members of the families of the victims.

However, this car (9-3) immediately moved backwards and blocked the street exactly at my arrival.


At the left strip of d'Youville, more police cars were stationed, including 21-3 and 16-1.

On the walls, on the trees, or on the columns: were red circles stickers for some reasons.


I stayed around 20 min. on the corner of St.-Pierre and d'Youville, and did not notice any new movements of the police cars, but as soon as I left, going home, 4 police cars passed me over right away - on the corner of Place d'Youville and McGill: a big black police Ford FRK4015; white police car 31-7 (Ford FKW4873); and 2 other white police cruisers.


I also noticed a crossover big black Ford 567 YYM, for its potential co-maneuvers with the police. However, if I am mistaken, I am apologizing for "splashing" this car's id.


When, on 22 Mar. 2023, I walked from home to the plaza on the corner of Atwater and St.-Catherine, I was followed (near home) by a "fake" taxi. I call it a "fake taxi", because there was a private-form number on its license plate, instead of something like T11141D. It was, most likely, E08-VWF. The same taxi appeared later, near rue Notre-Dame (a key point).


Near the bridge (the major key point!), I was "intercepted" by a police car; most likely, it was 15-9.


At the next key point after Notre-Dame, on the corner of Atwater-St.-Jacques, a black Chrysler slowly turned right from St.-Jacques. First of all, this model is rare in Montreal; then - it happened (again) at the key point; thirdly, such cars are used more often for surveillance purposes; besides, several times, such cars were spying on me; and, finally, I spotted the same car in Old Montreal in midst of the police operation (see above).


Under the bridge (another key point!) I was "intercepted" by a next police car: Inspection, 19776 (...), white KIA FVA6006. Besides, there was a municipal car (also a kind of police) with flash lights, and a Telus car.


On the corner of Atwater-Rene-Levesque (next key point), I was "intercepted" by a known to me black car (Toyota), which, I suspect, is used for surveillance purposes.


Then, on the corner of Atwater-St.-Catherine, the police car 15-11 (Dodge W. FMF9595), was "waiting on me" at the destination point.


This police vehicle is one of 3 police cars, which were involved in the overwhelming majority of incidents, when I was demonstratively intimidated, surveilled, escorted, stopped and interrogated by police. Now, tell that its presence here was "coincidental"!


First of all, the police cruiser 15-11 does not "belong" here, because the location of the police station number 15 is in Pointe-St.-Charles, not Westmount. Often walking up the streets Green, Atwater, or Guy, to downtown and Westmount, I almost never seen police cars 15-... North of (after) St.-Antoine.


At the same time and at the same corner, an Amazon bus was turning from St.-Catherine to Atwater, and continued down after Rene-Levesque. When I left the Alexis Nehon Plaza later, the same bus was standing at the Tupper Street - Atwater spot, which gave a good view of my movements.


When I approached Atwater - Rene-Levesque, I saw a police car in the distance, supposedly, the same 15-11, and, approaching Atwater - St.-Antoine (the 1-st intersection after a long-long slope!), I spotted a police car behind, suggesting that it might be the same police car 15-11. Being curious - what will do a policeman behind its (15-11) steering wheel if I speed up and turn left at St.-Antoine (pretending that I am not going home, but trying to escape from the police surveillance) - I went (along St.-Antoine) towards rue Vinet, and, then, continued to descend along the Vinet Street towards Notre-Dame. Before the corner of Vinet and av. Lionel Groulx, I deliberately stopped, and waited 2 minutes, and, when I continued walking after av. Lionel Groulx, the same police car 15-11 crossed the same intersection behind my back.


Then, using the backyards passages, where a police car could not pass (and also small streets), I approached the bridge over the Lachine canal (rue Charlevoix): the MAIN KEY POINT.


Right here, another, a more "serious", police vehicle appeared on the bridge: a big white crossover RCMP 211 FRY5110 (tell me it was a "coincident"!). (See below)


Being right near my home, I spotted a white car like a police cruiser, but, because of the distance, I was not sure this time. At the same moment, an Amazon bus approached to the corner, and turned to my street, passing my house and me.


The intimidation did not stop even inside my home. A letter from the municipal office was inserted right into my door. There is no clearance-gap there; it is impossible to insert an envelope like this without opening the door by a key. I attempted to pull it out, but could not, because the envelope was too clamped by the door. I pulled with all my force, but the envelope was sitting firmly. I could get it out ONLY when I opened the door by my key. When I closed the door (still standing outside my apartment) and attempted to shove it back between the lintel and the door, it struck out. It means that someone had to open the door first, and only then, without closing it, to place the envelope between the lintel and the door, and then to slam the door. In other words, an intruder illegally visited our apartment and left a sign about it (the envelope as a proof), playing on my nerves.


All the time, for more than 20 years in this building, we received similar envelopes pushed under the door...


When I left for a walk, I placed the door rug inside in a specific position, to see if we had unwanted visitors. Now, judging by rug's position and shape, it was clear that an unauthorized intrusion really took place...


In one of the following books, I described the incident, which took place on 20 Aug. 2022, when my wife, and me, and our younger daughter - we visited our older daughter.

When our younger daughter drove us from her sister back to her home, a black police car, Police Laval 74 (or 174), Ford SVH, met us at the key point (at the intersection of Levesque Ouest; moving along Levesque O. towards my daughter's street (going east, i.e. crossing my daughter's street on Levesque O.). (Thus, it was obviously a sign of surveillance (it's appearance at the same key point second in second with us). Then, the police car turned right on my daughter's street, but to the North, i.e. - in the opposite direction to our movement.

However, in 30-40 seconds, this police car made a 180-degree U-turn, and started following us. It could happen only if the police officers received a command on radio or from another communication device to follow us. This black police car Laval Police ...74 (or 174) then followed us to my daughter's home, and went to my daughter's backyard - stopping there and parking behind us (no flashlights), without giving us any signs to stop on our way from Levesque O. to my daughter's backyard (which across the next street, i.e. a long-long block away). It means that the police perfectly knew our destination, which is also an undeniable proof of surveillance.

A policewoman - a young (harmonious posture; beautiful blond) woman - approached, and asked Marta about her owner's right for the car. Marta - pregnant with her second child - was very stressed, and this was not a good event for a pregnant woman.


I absolutely believe that it was not a "random" casual incident. Police can always find a formal excuse just for anything, but, whatever they might present as a pretext for this demarche, I believe that they were targeting ME. I am almost sure that this provocation was planned for a very particular objective. They want to destroy my warm-hearted relations with my family members, especially, with my sons-in-law. Both of them are smart, clever, well-educated, loving, and good men with an adequate ethical stand. However, people, who harass me, hope that the difference in mentality (I was raised in ex-USSR, and they were born in Quebec), and intimidation factor will brake me apart from my family. Indeed, the police attention is very, very scary for anyone, especially, in all today's post-democracy societies, where any government's partiality (not speaking about repressions!) can ruin anyone's socioeconomic status, security, and future. (It is enough to see - how they ruined my own life).


That's why, after the incident in Aug. 2022, I started to expect another similar provocation, this time near my older daughter's home, somewhere in 7-8 months (besides, the policewoman also mentioned 7-8 months, but I don't remember - for what reason). And the next incident really happened: on April, 20, 2023. (Here is even the same date of the month: "20"; and the same 1-st letter of the month: "A"-ugust; "A"-pril). Around 17:00 - 17:10, I went out (from my older daughter's house) to the terrace, with my 5 y.o. granddaughter. In this very moment (almost second in second) a police car turned to our street, and the policeman-driver approached the house (sitting in the car). He applied the brake, slowing down, and menacingly gazed at me, then ride away. When this police car started to move away further and further, I took out my small pocket photo-camera, and made one shot, immediately putting the camera back into the pocket. I did not look into the viewfinder; I did not take the camera up to my face: I did the photo some cm from above terrace's wooden railing. You don't must be an expert to see it from the photo (see below).


Let's stress: I photographed the car clandestinely; the black small pocket camera represented an unremarkable object against my black jacket. How could the policeman see that I am photographing something? Plus, this is not the full photo, but a crop; on the full photo one can see that the car is already considerably far away. (Even if I would openly photograph the street, who could say for sure that I am not taking photos of the street in general, but, instead, targeting the car?) Besides, the policeman was behind the steering wheel, and needed at least a minimal attention for the road!


Then (when the police car already disappeared in the distance), my granddaughter demanded to make some photos of her, and I pulled out the camera again.


When the police car returned, I was holding the camera in my hands, speaking to my granddaughter, and, thus, the police officer now had a formal pretext to ask me why I photographed his police car - even if he (in reality) did not see actually that I made a photo of this police car.


He just started to interrogate me, when my son-in-law jumped out from the house to the police officer, explained something, and the policeman drove away. I don't know - what exactly my son-in-law did say, and did not want to ask him.


If this was an isolated incident - my close ones would not react so stressfully, but because police harassment if going on for many years, my wife was so frightened that we were afraid that she might have a stroke. The child was also frightened, and the whole family terrorized.


See below: the police officer interrogates me (I kept the camera between the planks of the railing, and the police officer could not see that I made - again - one photo). [Because there is a small chance that THIS particular incident could happen accidently, and this police officer was just doing his job, not participating in routine spying (on me) and intimidating, I blackened his face, preventing it from be seen by the public.]


(see below)


Now, let's analyze - what exactly happened, and what are the chances that this was a pre-planned terror attack provocation.


I believe that this case is different from the incident with black police car, Police Laval 74 (or 174), Ford SVH, which was an obvious provocation. Here the chances are 50 x 50 (as it seems to me).


First of all, I took this police car for another car. During last 2 months, another white police car with the same color scheme and emblems, was harassing me in the same area, around Metro and bus station, and on my way to my daughters. Only from the photos - I could understand that another car is a car of a different model (and, probably, different brand). That (another) police officer used to block my way; or to open his car's window as if he wants to question me; or used to place his car at one of the parallel streets (or in parking lots) - to show that he's watching me; etc. Once I memorized the board number of the "intimidating" police car, but forgot to write it down later. Another time, I wrote it down, but the peace of paper was lost somewhere. I managed to take a photo of this car from behind, but, because of low quality of the photo-camera, and of the weather and light conditions, this single photo came out non-sharp and blurry. So, now I took a photo of THIS police car hoping to clear the identity of that intimidating police cruiser.


Besides, this police officer (from the car 272) also has a moustache and a small beard, and he's in the same age and build, and, still, I think, these are two different men, because every time I recall the face of that (another) policeman, I doubt that it is the same person.


In addition, unlike the police car Police Laval 74 (or 174), Ford SVH, which appeared "on the horizon" multiple times, this car (Mascouche Police 272) was never noticed before (or just was not identified), and, if so, this car (and its driver-policeman) is not a part of the police-state terror against people like me.


However, the circumstances still provoke too many questions.


1. This police car materialized exactly when I went out from the house, and was alone (only with the child; without any other adult from my family).


2. This police car came with a possible provocation EXACTLY in around 8 months - as I previsioned, and as the policewomen said.


3. This police car appeared near my older daughter's home on the "20" of the month - and the previous provocation at my younger daughter's home also happened on the same day; and both months (August and April) have first letter "A". I know from my sad experience that the government officials just adore playing similar dirty tricks.


4. This - next - incident happened on my wedding anniversary (and I know from my sad experience that the government officials just adore playing similar dirty tricks).


5. When this police car approached to my daughter's house, the policeman-driver almost stopped the car, and - as it seemed to me: gazed at me in an unfriendly manner. If it was not my overreaction (not my imagination), then it means that he deliberately provoked me to photograph his car (for getting an evidence of police intimidation).


6. It is very doubtful that the police officer could see in the mirror (look at the photo above) that I photographed him (took only 1 shot): he was far away; he was driving the car; my black camera is small; my black camera was imperceptible against the background of my black jacket; I was holding the camera down, not at the level of my face, hiding its lower part behind the railing.


7. It is a very controversial reaction (and reason) for a police officer to interrogate someone, who did no wrong things, just took photos of his police car, and this in case - when it is abundantly clear that a person is actually taking photos of a police car. However, in my case, there was no evidence that I am taking photos of his car particularly, but not of the street, and, thus, he had no reason to approach me and to interrogate me. Moreover, performing a U-turn, and going back for stalking an innocent person like me: it is already an offensive and intimidating behavior, which demonstrates aggression, and, if so, a violent act. Taking into consideration my age (I am almost 70 years old!): he had to think twice before confronting an old man. In addition, he intercepted me not in the street or in another public space, but at a private home, and, besides, I was with a child, and all this together is equating to an unprovoked and unjustified attack. To do so, he had to come with a MISSION - and he came with a mission: to bring a lot of troubles for me.


8. If it was an isolated incident, I could believe stronger in this police officer's innocence. However, after a brake in 6 or 7 years (when, after 2014 or 2015, policed ceased to stop and interrogate me innumerous times), they restarted to contact me directly since the beginning of mid-2021: stopping and interrogating me as before. I was stopped few times by the Metro police; once 2 police officers stopped me outside my Metro station (in the street), and demanded to show the Metro pass; then, at a gas-station, one policeman stopped me; then this incident, which I described above with the involvement of the black Police Laval 74 (or 174), Ford SVH; and so on. Thus, because this incident is fitting perfectly in the logical line (of other similar incidents), it is (by logic) was a pre-planned provocation.


9. The police car Mascouche Police 272 did not return immediately, but, at first, disappeared from my sight, and only then (when I was already playing with my granddaughter) appeared again. This means that the police officer did his U-turn only after receiving a command on the radio.


10. First of all, taking photos of the police cars is not a crime, and not a misconduct. Secondly, it is not my "guilt", because it is provoked by the refusal of Montreal police department to explain in writing - why I was stopped, intercepted, interrogated, escorted, searched, etc. by police innumerous times since 2005-2006. My complaints to police were taken seriously, and I was visited by two friendly police officers (one of whom was a colonel), who explained that the whole data of these incidents was erased from the police database, including information about (illegal) fines. And, because in some other Quebec cities (like Laval, Outremont, Hamsted, Cote-des-Neiges, ville de Quebec) I am framed, escorted, and intimidated by police more aggressively than in Montreal, it can be drawn a conclusion that the surveillance and intimidation by police is initiated on a higher level than the police department in Montreal.


11. Here is the most probable scenario (taking into consideration all above displayed facts and observations): someone of the police department superiors told the policeman from the car with the board number Mascouche Police 272: "Look, here is a guy, who likes to take photos of the police cars. He's now at this given address location. Go there and give him a good lesson". Another (less probably, but, still, possible scenario) is that someone from the police department, who knows my most typical reaction and who knows the most typical reaction of that police officer, told the letter just go and look at "that guy" (without telling - what to do). The police officer went and looked at me, provoked me to take a photo of his police car, and came back to interrogate me.


12. All facts and assumptions don't present this given police officer as a bad or a non-ethical person, but, rather, on contrary, he is, most likely, a good person, and a good police officer, who is just doing his duties (however, his energy would be much more efficiently used - if he would investigate or prevent real crimes, instead of be lashed on innocent people like me). I think that he was just provoked (like me) by the circumstances and unlawful actions of other people, unlike two police officers from the car Police Laval 74 (or 174), Ford SVH, who, certainly, were involved into a cruel unlawful action of illegal persecution and intimidation.


13. Instead of an (expected) photo of a white police car with the same color scheme, which was harassing me in last two months, I got just new troubles, but the whole affair was provoked by other illegal interceptions, repressions, intimidations, and surveillance by police and by some undercover people and cars.


14. These two (2) above described incidents near homes of my daughters prompted a new - and most frightening - development, when the police was instructed to restart not only repressions against an "unwanted" person (against me), but to start harassing victim's family members for their respect and support - naturally given to their farther, father-in-law, and grandfather. This is a demarche in the "best" Stalinist traditions, as the Stalin tyranny reverted and suppressed the most natural, the most human instincts and sentiments like family ties and love between the close ones. And now the same happens in Canada.


* * *


(GENERAL) PART 2:


Canadian media (TV, radio, newspapers, etc.), human rights organizations, and other recipients of my declaration ignored my letters about the police intimidation, - and never replied.


The content of the police case [the whole content of the Part 1] was submitted to dozens of Canadian newspapers, radio, TV, and other media resources.


Among the recipients were:

The Gazette (Montreal).

La Press (Montreal).

Le Devoir (Montreal).

Globe and Mail (Toronto).

The Star.

Écho Abitibien (Quebec)

Alliston Herald (Ontario)

Altona Red River Valley Echo (Manitoba)

Ancaster News (Stoney Creek, Hamilton, Ontario)

The Annex Guardian (Toronto, Ontario)

Avant-Poste (Quebec)

The Barrie Examiner (Ontario)

The Brampton Guardian (Ontario)

Brandon Sun (Brandon, Manitoba)

Brant News (Brant, Ontario)

The Burlington Post (Burlington, Ontario)

Calgary Herald (Alberta)

The Calgary Sun (Alberta)

Cambridge Reporter (Cambridge, Ontario)

Cambridge Times (Cambridge, Ontario)

Camrose Canadian (Alberta)

Camrose Morning News (Alberta)

Canada Focus (National)

Canada News Wire

The Canadian (Ontario)

Canadian Content (National)

he Canadian Exopolitics Newspaper (National)

Canadian Free Press (Toronto, Ontario)

The Canadian National Newspaper (National)

The Canadian National Newspaper (Ontario)

Capital News (Kelowna, British Columbia)

Chatham Daily News (Ontario)

The Chomedey News (Laval, Quebec)

The Chronicle Journal (Thunder Bay, Ontario)

The Citizen (Blyth, Ontario)

Cornwall Free News (Cornwall, Ontario)

Country X-Press (Omemee, Ontario)

Cyberpresse (Montréal, Quebec)

The Daily Courier (Kelowna, British Columbia)

Daily Herald-Tribune (Grande Prairie, Alberta)

Daily News (Kamloops, British Columbia)

The Daily News (Halifax, Nova Scotia)

The Daily Observer (Pembroke, Ontario)

The Daily Press (Timmins, Ontario)

Dictatorship Watch (Ottawa, Ontario)

The Dominion (National)

The Dryden Observer (Ontario)

The East York Mirror (Toronto, Ontario)

The Edmonton Examiner (Edmonton, Alberta)

Edmonton Journal (Alberta)

The Edmonton Sun (Alberta)

Elmira Independent (Ontario)

En Direct (Quebec)

The Equity (Quebec)

Erie Media (Welland, Port Colborne, Wainfleet & Pelham, Ontario)

The European American National News (Ontario)

Fire This Time (National)

The First Informer (Quebec)

Focus News Magazine (Huron County, Ontario)

The Free Press (British Columbia)

Friday AM (British Columbia)

Frontière (Quebec)

The Gazette (Montreal, Quebec)

Georgia Straight (Vancouver, British Columbia)

The Global Intelligence (New Brunswick)

Global Review (Toronto, Ontario)

The Globe & Mail (Toronto, Ontario)

The Golden Star (Golden, British Columbia)

Good Morning Sunshine (British Columbia)

The Grove Examiner (Spruce Grove, Alberta)

The Guardian (Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island)

Hamilton News (Hamilton, Ontario)

The Hanover Post (Ontario)

Havre (Quebec)

The Headliner (Headingley, St Francis-Xavier, Cartier & Macdonald, Manitoba)

The Herald (Halifax, Nova Scotia)

Horizon (Quebec, Ontario, Quebec) [Armenian, English & French]

The Immigration Times (Ontario)

Impact Campus (Quebec)

The Independent (Brighton, Ontario)

The Independent (Labrador)

The Independent & Free Press (Georgetown & Acton, Ontario)

The Intelligencer (Belleville, Ontario)

Internest (Quebec)

Impact (Quebec) [In Romanian, English & French

Journal de Québec (Quebec)

Journal de Sherbrooke (Quebec)

La Presse (Quebec) [In French]

La Revue (Quebec)

La Tribune (Sherbrooke, Quebec)

The Lacombe Globe (Alberta)

The Laval News (Laval, Quebec)

Le Bulletin Regional (Quebec)

Le Canada Francais (Quebec)

Le Courrier de la Nouvelle-Écosse (Nova Scotia)

Le Devoir (Montréal, Quebec)

Le Droit (Ottawa, Ontario)

L'Étoile (New Brunswick) [In French]

Le Journal d'Outremont (Outremont, Quebec)

Le Matinternet (Montréal, Quebec)

Le Nouvelliste (Trois-Rivières, Québec, Quebec)

Le Petit Journal (Newfoundland) [In French]

Le Presse (Montréal, Quebec)

Le Quotidien (Saguenay, Quebec)

Le Soleil (Quebec)

Les Hebdos regionaux de Quebecor (Quebec)

L'Express (Toronto, Ontario) [In French]

The London Free Press (Ontario)

The London Journal (Ontario)

Lookout (British Columbia)

LTVnews.com (Sault Ste Marie, Ontario)

L'Aurure Boréale (Yukon Territory) [In French]

L'Oeil Regional (Quebec) [In French]

Maghreb Observateur (Québec)

The Manotick Messenger (Manotick, Ontario)

Maple Creek News (Saskatchewan)

Mayerthorpe Freelancer (Alberta)

Mboaconnect (Montreal, Québec) [In French]

The Meaford Independent (Meaford, Ontario)

Midland Mirror (Ontario)

The Montréal Gazette (Québec)

The Montréal Greek Times (Montréal, Québec) [In Greek]

Montréal Times (Montréal, Québec) [In English]

The Morning Star (Vernon, British Columbia)

My West Island (Montréal - West Island, Québec) [In English]

Nanton News (Alberta)

Nasha Canada (Toronto, Ontario) [In Russian]

National Post Online (Toronto, Ontario)

The Nelson Daily

New Canadian (Ontario) [In Russian]

New Hamburg Independent (New Hamburg, Ontario)

New Westminster Newsleader (British Columbia)

New Winnipeg (Manitoba)

The News (Nova Scotia)

The News Media (Toronto, Ontario)

NL Press (Labrador, Newfoundland)

Norfolk News (Norfolk County, Ontario)

Ob-Zine News Community (Québec)

Objectif Plein-Jour (Québec)

Observer (Agassiz/Harrison, British Columbia)

Opinion 250 (British Columbia)

The Oshawa Express (Oshawa, Ontario)

The Ottawa Citizen (Ontario)

The Ottawa Citizen Global (Ontario)

The Ottawa Sun (Ontario)

Ottawa X Press (Ontario)

Paris Star (Ontario)

The Peterborough Examiner (Ontario)

Point (Dolbeau-Mistassini, Québec)

The Post (Ontario)

The Prescott Journal (Ontario)

Progrès Écho (Québec)

Québec Chronicle Telegraph (Québec)

Québec Mercury (Quebec City, Québec) [In English]

Queens County Times (Nova Scotia)

Réveil (Québec)

Rabble (National)

The Reporter (Nova Scotia)

The Republic (Vancouver, British Columbia)

Saint-Laurent Portage (Québec)

Sentinelle (Québec)

Sherbrooke Record (Québec)

The Standard (Hope, British Columbia)

The Standard Freeholder (Cornwall, Ontario)

The Sun Times (Owen Sound, Ontario)

Tandem News (Toronto, Ontario)

The Times (Clearwater, British Columbia)

Tremblant Express (Québec) [In French & English]

The Tribune (Restigouche County, New Brunswick)

The Valley Sentinel (Robson Valley, British Columbia)

The Vancouver Courier (Courier, British Columbia)

Vancouver Star (British Columbia)

Vancouver Sun (British Columbia)

Vigile (Québec)

The Voice (Ontario)

The West End Times (Montreal, Québec)

Winnipeg Free Press (By Subscription, Manitoba)

Winnipeg Sun News (Manitoba)

Canadian State Radio CBC (Submitted to 5 shows and podcasts, and to 6 radio hosts personally). Canadian State Television CBC.

TVA Television Channel.

CTV Television Channel.


Few samples of the emails lists of the submitted to media messages:


Samples of the automatic replies, generated by some of the media emails" robots (which is a confirmation that my emails were received):


I also contacted a number of human rights organizations in Canada, and other organizations (for example, the Canadian Council for the Arts [because my music, poetry, and literary works are suppressed], but never received any reply (in exception of the automatic replies, generated by robots in confirmation that my emails were received):


Besides the description of the police case, I sent (separately) the description of the bizarre events in medical institutions, and, in particular, the description of the bizarre actions by Dr. Brian Morris, who provoked (by his actions) years of unspeakable suffering and 2 surgeries, and committed an irreparable damage to my health. I also reported about the lost, incomplete, falsified, or doubtful medical tests.


However, I received no replies, beside the automatic messages, generated by robots: that my letters were received.


In a number of my emails, I indicated my telephone number, and also 3-4 alternative email addresses.

I believe that the media"s and human rights organizations" refusal to respond to my reports constitutes a grave example of the human rights violation, and cannot be acceptable in the democratic society.

GENERAL PART 3:

Systemic sabotage of my Internet-access and the email service; innumerous disconnections of my Internet and my phone. [Internet-Emails Sabotage 1997-2021.]


To Whom It May Concern


From Lev Gunin


DECLARATION 2019-2021


PART 1


THE PREAMBLE.


Deprivation someone of phone / Internet / email access in our digital era is equal to a house arrest, which constitutes a very serious human rights abuse. It is causing the same isolation from the outside world. Systematic disconnections of my phone line and Internet during more then 20 years caused irreparable damage to me and my family members. Inability to contact close family members, cousins, and other relatives; difficulties for our children to study and work; unsolved heath issues (because of inability to consult the Web): are just few matters among hundreds.


Together with other components of politically-motivated persecutions they destroyed my life; eliminated even a slight opportunity for normal income; made not possible my professional career; etc.


In 1997, I received a sequence of emails (from a particular group of people), which contained provocative, menacing, and threatening messages. [See: Attachments 1, I.1.]


Instead of supporting my demand of a criminal investigation (by the way, I also sent 3 letters to police), Colba.net provider - at first - suddenly blocked my access to my web site (a significant totalitarian beginning), then to our emails, and then disconnected the Internet permanently.

Without explaining the reason, Colba.net unilaterally cancelled our consumer agreement, terminated the service for us, and we had to switch to another IP (Total.net).


In the beginning (10 or 11 months) we had no problems with this new Internet-Email provider, which was also very significant. However, even later the situation was not comparable with the persecutions by Colba.net and Inter.net Canada.


The most serious issue was a very frequent corruption (as I was told: because of the hacking) of my user name - password combination, computer system"s malfunctioning when connected to the server (but when I had a temporary alternative access: it never happened!), and every day"s attacks by computer viruses.


The most annoying in September, 2000, was an abnormally long connection to the server (up to 10-15 minutes), and the malfunctioning of the computer system when - finally - connected to Internet (working slower to the level of dysfunctionality, then frozen until restarting)


[See: Attachment 1, I.1. (Complaint to Total net administration. September, 2000).]


The same used to happen with all our desktop and laptop computers: as soon as the dial up software has connected them to total net. It never happened before 16 September 2000, and was not an issue. However, an alternative access to Internet did not slow down our computers, and did not freeze their systems.


I never received any explanation from Total net technicians or administration why this happened, or any advice, or an apology. A month or two later the dial up connection to Total net just became normal by itself, without any update or modification of our computers and their systems, and without any changes on our side.


Since the beginning of 2001, problems with the Internet-access and the email service have dramatically multiplied.


The Internet-connection was unilaterally restricted by the Total net provider to only 1 phone number (without any warning or letter); each of the emails was doubled or tripled (up to 10 "clones"); the access to my web-site was blocked, and the most important materials were erased. [See: Attachment 1, I.2. (The response to Total net"s explanations. January, 2001).]


The attacks by the computer viruses became so massive that could block my access to Internet just without other methods to cut me from the outside world. [See the Attachment 01-2.]


The typical connection problems in 2000 (see above).


1.1. However, when the Total net service was purchased by another company (it was by then

Uniserve-Inter-net), and then by the Inter net Canada (if I am not mistaken, it happened in

January, 2001), the problems have tripled. The unsolved problems, which I directed to Total

Net"s administration, remained unsolved under Inter Net"s Canada, and, plus, new problems

have materialized. [See Attachment 01-3; Attachment 02.]


The access to my web-site was restored, but the web-site itself was sabotaged, and I could not

maintain it any more [See the explanation in the Attachment 2 (My letter to Inter net Canada,

December, 2001 - January, 2002)]. Since I became a customer of Inter net Canada, my personal

emails have been subjected to the filtering (subjected to censorship), as almost any email,

containing complains about political persecutions, medical crimes, i.e. did not reach its

destination. Emails from political activists, thinkers, philosophers, or writers: often do not reach

my email box. Besides, every email was doubled or tripled. [See: Attachment 2]


In January, 2001 (when Total Net was already overtaken by Inter Net Canada) - I was charged

twice for the same month [JAN 04-01 / BPY / 26.40 JAN 30-01 / BPY / 26.40 in the bank

statement]. Plus, I never received an invoice for the date of January 30. My calls and messages to

the billing department were ignored; so, I contacted the Total Net administration. And, still, the

company did not return the money. I don"t remember if the extra 30-dollars sum was paid back

to me ever, but I remember weeks, or even months of arguing and demanding the

reimbursement. [See: Attachment 2]


The problems with the Internet connection have reappeared in the beginning of September, 2001, shortly before the 9-11 attacks. (It happened in the same day when a heavy object fell from the roof on City Counselors street, and only miraculously did not kill me). In September-November, 2001, serious problems have sporadically appeared, but in December the Internet connection has started to slow down (considerably!) the computer system again. We were cut out from the outside world. During a number of years, the systematic disruption of our Internet-Telephone communications was causing deep psychological traumas to my family members, first of all - to my children. All complains to Inter net Canada led to nothing. We could not use the Internet normally during almost 2 months (December, 2001 - January, 2002), and then (as already happened before) everything has suddenly normalized without any changes from our side. We were given no explanation, no apology, and no compensation. [See: Attachment 2].


Since Inter Net Canada took over Total Net"s services I was facing not sporadic, but now unusual systematic MASS virus attacks, well-coordinated, and connected to Inter Net Canada. Not just because all my complains about the massive virus attacks were ignored, but because most of the computer virus attacks were directed from Inter Net co.il, which has the same name as Inter Net Canada, and, maybe, had some relation to Inter Net Canada. The virus attacks have intensified in August-September (exactly prior to the events of 9-11) so that practically toppled my access to Inter Net"s services. 90 percent of the virus attacks were directed from emails or Internet resources of co.il. [See Attachment 2]


In November, 2001, in a complain to Inter Net Canada, I stressed that I have permanent difficulties to 1) access Internet; 2) browse Internet; 3) receive and send e-mails; 4) maintain my web site. And, because of the systematic character of my user's access interruption and ignorance of all my complains I considered it a sabotage. For 2,5 months all incoming and outgoing e-messages were delayed or disappeared. Sometimes I had no Internet-access for 2-3 days.


In November, 2001, I have contacted Inter Net Canada many times, and spoke to several technical support operators. I told them that I am able to access Internet 1 time per day only (usually at 7 - 8 a.m.), or just 1 time per 2-3 days. The rest of the time my access to Internet was blocked, and my password was invalid. 2 Inter Net Canada's technicians checked for me if my password-user combination works, and told me that it is not working. The referral numbers of the technicians were 202-1971 and 202-9931. The second (Gabriel, 202-9931) checked it for me on 18 Nov. 2001, at 7 p.m. However, when I tried to access Internet the same day at 20.30 - the connection worked, but I was still not able to browse Internet or receive my e-mails (since 17 Nov. 2001). When I was calling Inter Net Canada for the technical support, I used to wait from 40 min. to 1,5 hours before somebody answered my call, which is unacceptable. I demanded a 6 months" bonus, but my demand was just ignored. I received no explanation, no apology, no compensation. [For more details, see the Attachment 2.]


1.2. It is very significant and extremely disturbing that during the same periods of time - when the access to Internet was sabotaged, - the telephone line was also malfunctioning or disconnected, which reveals an obvious pattern of coordination.


In 1996-1997, we were terrorized by BELL, which sent us bills for services and equipment we never requested and never received (like faxes, printers, telephones, a communication center, an answering machine, an ID caller, and so on). Besides an obvious fact that we never requested and never received the alleged devices and services, I was always using my 2 of own telephone apparatus (I can even provide the copies of all the receipts on request), an internal computer"s fax modem, purchased (in the underground shopping center at McGill Metro station) my own ID caller and my own answering machine, and had no need in BELL"s online ID caller, phone, fax, and answering machine services.


Naturally, we did not pay the forged bills, and then BELL started to send us hundreds of dollars in fines with an enormous percent (interest rate). My undeniable evidence that nor I, nor my wife - we never requested, never received, and never rented any equipment from BELL, and never requested, received, and used any additional (busyness-like) services: was just ignored.


The very fact that we never signed any contract, and never ordered anything by phone, and, consequently, Bell never had nor a contract document signed by us, nor a recording of a verbal agreement, nor a consignment note for the alleged equipment delivery, nor a receipt with our signatures for receiving the alleged equipment: did not convince Bell"s operators and their supervisors.


Besides the alleged equipment, Bell was non-stop bombarding us by the bills for inter-urban and International calls, which we never made. We (me and my wife) personally went to Jean-Talon"s Bell"s office (in the underground shopping center at Jean-Talon"s Metro station) to speak with them, but in vain. Only when I turned to a lawyer (to Maître Miroslaw Jankowski, my close friend), BELL immediately dropped all demands, annulated all claims, and left us alone. However, our telephone line was systematically disrupted or disconnected. Besides, BELL was systematically overcharging us for no reasons, for months denying the revision of our bills. When, after my appeals to human rights organizations and to lawyers, BELL, was finally, admitting that we were illegally overcharged, we never received an apology, and BELL always claimed that the overcharging has occurred due to a "mistake of the billing department".


However, Bell"s persecutions did not stop here. 4 times Bell"s technicians came to inspect our apartment without out consent, later forcing us to pay for their visits.


Once, when the Internet-speed became considerably slow, sometimes falling down to "0", our Internet-provider demanded Bell"s inspection of our telephone line, and "a problem was found in Bell"s head office". When it was fixed, the speed immediately returned to normal, but we received several calls from Bell, and were told that we must go back to Bell, that we "betrayed" Bell by switching to another phone service, and will pay for it.


Another time, when our phone-Internet line was completely disconnected, Bell"s technicians again found the problem in Bell"s head office. And, again, we were harassed by calls from Bell after that, and were threatened for not staying with Bell"s services.


1.3. It explains, why, when Canada eased the restrictions for alternative phone line providers, we switched to Sprint Canada.


However, soon the same problems have reappeared again: probably, because not Sprint, but BELL continued to control all material telephone communications facilities in Canada. For example, the malfunctioning and disruptions of the telephone service have continued from April to August, 2002.


In 2 of my complains to Sprint Canada (May-July, 2002) I gave an account of the troubles: 1) the frequent disconnections of the phone line [no dial tone], despite the fact that only 1 telephone apparel was connected to the telephone line by then (besides the ID caller and the answering machine), and the Internet was not running; 2) we were also systematically disconnected from Internet or when sending a fax (a message was coming: "line error"); 3) sometimes my telephone conversations were cut off, or, while talking on the phone (a conventional phone, with a receiver attached) I could often hear strange sounds in the background or clicks (but we had no second line). In April our telephone was dead almost 3 days (24-26 of April), and after July, 2002, the telephone line was disconnected 4 times for 2-4 days. [See: Attachment 4].


1.4. After speaking to Sprint Canada"s operator, who promised a 10-dollar bonus (compensation) for 3-days phone disconnection, I discovered in the next bill an extra 10-dollars charge. The $10 (marked as a bonus) actually ("by mistake") became a surplus to our payment. So, instead of receiving a bonus, I was overcharged, and had to pay additionally $10 for no reason! I've spoken to one of Sprint Canada"s employees again (whose name was Corrire) - and was told that now I MUST pay the bill, and in the next month Sprint will add $20 as a bonus. However, I already was promised a bonus, but, instead, was (to the contrary) overcharged! When I tried to call Spring Canada again multiple times, I could not get through, and I suspected that I was punished for my complains by a sort of a disconnection from Sprint Canada"s telephone operators" customers support. I tried to access the Sprint Canada through the web page, but strangely each time was disconnected as well. So, I sent another (modified) version of my complain to Sprint Canada by mail (by Post Canada) [See: Attachment 4].


1.5. I received an official response from Sprint Canada, which was by then an only generous and responsible reaction from Internet - Phone providers. At least, I received an apology and explanation. According to Sprint, our phone line was disconnected (sabotaged) at Bell"s central office, where the wires were materially (manually) detached. Here (below) is its photocopy:


1.6. It is difficult to suggest how my access to many of YouTube"s videos and to the search engines were blocked, and who was involved, but, theoretically, it is possible that our Internet-provider was implicated. Was I redirected to a sublimated page? Or, maybe, it was organized on a higher level? (See an example below).


And because I was trying to watch this particular video, it is obvious that the sabotage was politically-motivated (see the link below).


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JeViFiODSYo


From 1997 to 2009, the sabotage of my access to the search engines" normal and non-filtered service caused the dramatic decline of my health, because I could not consult Internet for solving my health issues, while facing discrimination, harassment, and denials in the medical institutions.


Especially aggressive were by then such information resources as Yahoo, Yandex, and Amazon. But who need them if there is Google, right?


However, even Google was very often unavailable for me, and, when it concerns the health issues, it could be sometimes critical. A number of questions, from medical topics to medical terminology, were closed for me sometimes for days or weeks, and there is no way to know if they were blocked by my Internet-provider, by the Internet-portals themselves, or by Google. Here (below) is one of the samples of Google"s dysfunction for me and filtering.


The word and items "slovar"" (dictionary in Russian) was "not found" by Goole (see the screenshot):


Seeing what happened, I rushed to the "document source", and also studied the browser"s folder in the System"s Users" directory, and found very interesting things. I found in the scripts the traces of "co.il", which geographically does not localized the United States, but points to a different place on the globe, which notoriously was already very familiar to me.


The same corresponds also to such occurrences (within the same period of time), when my browser could not find Google at all:


or could not recognize Russian, German, French, Arab, or Chinese letters (characters):


Someone"s decision not to cut completely my access to search engines is a smart and artful tactics. On one hand, in response of a request with a certain combination of words (when the ideological supervisors are screaming "hotly!"), the number of found pages is artificially restricted, or a message jumps out: "not found". On the other hand - this sabotage should be evaluated and valued together with other tricks and methods which are severely complicating my life. Every day the Internet oxygen is superimposed more and more strictly, and it becomes more difficult to breathe...


I paid for the Internet much: more than overage in Canada. But - instead of the access to Internet and its resources - I was getting difficulties, sabotage, and discrimination...


1.7. I don"t know how the free email accounts are interacting with the paid ones, but I suspect some sort of a synchronization. Not all of my free emails were involved in such an interaction, but Mail.ru was definitely involved, and, it is not excluded: not directly.


Having a Mail.ru account for my own name, I was facing a number of problems since approximately 2005-2006. When my email service at leog@total.net (Inter Net Canada) used to be sabotaged or did not function at all: in the same time, my account at Mail.ru was simultaneously suspended or malfunctioning. All 5 other free email services were working for me just fine, except of Mail.ru. Why? Was I persecuted by some politically-motivated people in Russia, or, maybe, by a foreign lobby in Russia, which was pulling the strings? Was it a tight coordination between the rival political forces in the West and in the East to suppress free thinkers? Are they both working for the same Master?


Anyway, when I discovered that emails, which automatically went to the folder "sent" in my leog@total.net webmail at Inter Net Canada, and were daily deleted by me on the steady bases, appear in this folder after I was deleting them, I simultaneously discovered that Mail.ru is storing my correspondents" addresses, in spite of the fact that I did not have an address-book at Mail.ru, and would erase any contacts if they would be accidently reside in the address book.


So, I never entered anything to the address book, and frequently checked the email configuration, to be sure that my contacts would not go to the address book by settings. And, still, as soon I was typing any letter in the address window, its line instantly use to double, triple, etc., revealing names and addresses of all my respondents, which had such a key letter (see below the screenshot): However, when the address boot itself was opened, there were NO data there, not a single address! (See below the screenshot). Maybe, other tabs could reveal "hidden" data? No, thus was not the issue. (See below).


However, when the address boot itself was opened, there were NO data there, not a single address! (See below the screenshot).


Maybe, other tabs could reveal the "hidden" data? No, thus was not the issue.


(See below).


But, if the address book is empty, where the addresses are coming from? Were they accumulated in my computer system"s hidden files, or resided in the browser"s cash? No! My system worked from a live CD; I was systematically restoring the browser"s state to the "virgin" pureness, destroying all the confidential information, and was cleaning the hard disc manually and with the special software on the daily basis. No searches, no smart software could find anything that might store my contacts. Even my friends, computer specialists, could not find the clue. When, using a special software, I started to dig deeper, I discovered that non-authorized by me and stored somewhere in Mail.ru my respondents" addresses were coming not from Mail.ru. The digital URL has revealed an unknown to me server in United States...


As soon as I sent a request to Mail.ru administration in this matter, my email account was closed. I sent dozens messages to Mail.ru, demanding an explanation, why my account was closed, but never received any answer. All my attempts to open a new account at Mail.ru later failed.


1.8. In the 2-nd half of 2020, when a major sabotage of my webmail service has started to evolve, and my correspondence was completely stopped: in this very moment the most important for me free email account became unavailable (the message was: incorrect login-password combination). It happened because someone hacked into my email account, and changed them. Just another example of a very obvious coordination.


And, since the bold sabotage of my webmail account (I was paying for it!) has began in 2020, Yandex has completely blocked my access to it"s search engine, and, in addition, even to the news. Moreover, when I tried to use Yandex"s search engine through anonymizers, or web sites with Yandex"s search window, or using the VPN service: even in such a case Yandex somehow indentified me, and blocked my access. (See the screenshots).


The codes, which are displayed by Yandex (which demands to prove that I am "not a robot"), are unclear, uncertain, or impossible to read. (See below another example).


However, if even the code is more or less lucid, and I entered it correctly, Yandex is blocking my access anyways (see below):


[An editorial remark: since 2019 (since the Covid pandemic) Yandex is COMPLETELY blocking my access...]


Besides, Yandex is an International service, and should respect the International laws, but the

codes, displayed for the purpose to check if a user is not a robot, are in both Latin and Cyrillic,

which violate the foreign users" rights (they may not have a Cyrillic keyboard).


In the same time, it is also a violation of Russian-speaking users" rights, because they not necessarily must have a Latin keyboard, while Yandex is a Russia-based company, and must obey both International, and Russian Federation"s laws. Yandex should give 2 separate options: Latin and Cyrillic separately, not both in the same window. In addition, this is an intrusive tool, which violates customers" privacy, because when a user is switching between the languages, this is a window for using an opportunity of the privacy breaches. And, finally, Yandex is displaying such words (in 2 codewindows) like "incorrect", "mistake" (oshibka), "no access" (nedostupen), or "sucker" (sosunok), or "you"re banned" (zaprescheno), or "school", etc.: all with the bold humiliation and harassment implications:


It is an evident that Yandex is not supposed to let me in even if I enter the code. It is just outraged how Yandex is justifying this humiliation:


"It is possible that the requests are not yours, but are coming from another user, browsing the Internet from the same as yours IP-address. (...) we will remember you then, and could distinguish you from other users".


So, I suggest that, while Yandex is just unique of its own type, other companies are doing the same, simply without advertizing it, and that there is a some kind of a clandestine agreement between all relatively big companies, which activity is founded on communication and Internet-based services: from Beijing to Deli, from Moscow to London, from Iceland to Australia, and from Tokio to New-York. Consequently, all problems for me, deliberately generated by Bell Canada and Inter Net Canada, arose not only because of the politically-motivated persecutions, or because they are business-oriented companies (unfriendly to ordinary users), but also because of this particular discrete non-official global arrangement.


1.9. From 2002 to 2006 (for 3 years) the major Internet-Phone problems have mysteriously disappeared. (This is why in one of the first messages to Inter Net Canada after this break I wrote that "in general" I was satisfied by their services (by then). There still were the smaller problems (from time to time) - but every customer have them, and I could not prove (to someone or to myself) that they occurred "because of"... However, as Harper"s government has replaced the Liberals exactly in 2006, all tremendous violations of my access to Phone-Internet communications have immediately reappeared. In 2006 the police started to intercept, interrogate and follow me multiple times (more than 100 times from 2006 to 2014), and, besides other indications, it is just another connection to Harper"s regime, which was around exactly till 2014. In March, 2006, I did not have an Internet access for 18 days (!), and was anyway charged for this period of time. A promise to reimburse my payment or to give me a bonus was just a lie. I did not receive any compensation, nor even an apology [See: Attachment 5].


Instead of an apology, they began to bombard me by hundreds of emails, claiming that I have a virus (Trojan) in my computer that sends thousands of spam letters, advising to consult an attachment for instructions of how to remove the virus. This attachment was (positively!) a bios-resident virus, and might theoretically damage my hardware. My previous Celeron motherboard was destroyed by a similar virus when I was reading a sensitive political material. In addition to all these very disturbing violations of my freedoms and rights, and the troubling Inter Net Canada"s actions, there was a considerable change of the Internet-speed, which became much slower then I was paying for [For the further details: See: Attachment 5]. Another, very troubling, Inter Net Canada"s action was a submission of a promotion of their services instead of a response to my complain [See: Attachment 5].


Instead of giving me a bonus, or returning the money for 18 days of no Internet-access, in response to my calls and my email messages about this issue (sent later, when my Internet-access was, finally, restored), on March 28, 2006 (Tuesday) Inter Net Canada responded by an email from ... Total Net (or its imposter), claiming that an alleged virus on my computer is running a hidden proxy server, which sends hundreds of spam messages (see below).


An attachment, called "Instruction" (how to remove the virus) was attached to this message, but there was a very malicious virus in the attachment. Since 28 of March, 2006, I received the same message with the same virus in the attachment hundreds of times, most of them: in April-March, 2006 (see below).


By then, I could not believe that Inter Net Canada was behind this scam: it looked unbelievable

or even ridiculous for me in 2006-2012, and I never raised this issue.


However, later, having a wider experience, I was tending not to exclude this possibility. I telephoned (in 2006) to Inter Net Canada"s customer"s support, reporting about this particular email with the virus in the attachments dozens of times, but all complains were ignored. No filters were applied to block this particular malicious email with (constantly!) the same email address from entering my email box; no excuses or explanations were given, which is just another evidence that Inter Net Canada could be behind this and other Trojans-Viruses attacks (see below: May-September, 2006).


This particular message came from Inter Net Canada.


A special attention must be paid to the fact that among hundreds of viruses were the most malicious for that time, which were probably used only by the militaries, by professional hackers, by the foreign intelligence services, or by terrorists.


Inter Net Canada"s server supposed to filter all incoming email for viruses, not to allow any of them to enter my email box.


However, hundreds of viruses and thousands of the scam messages were attacking my computer without any obstacle form the email server. And, again, instead of responding to my complains about the 18 days of no Internet-access, problems to connect to Internet or to retrieve my emails, etc., Inter Net Canada just sent me another promotion-marketing email in response, completely ignoring all complains (Thu, 18 May 2006; see the Attachment 5).


Instead of responding directly to the complains about the massive and systematic viruses attacks through the emails, Inter Net Canada"s administration has submitted an email, claiming that, allegedly, an imposter is sending malicious emails in the name of Inter Net Canada:


VIRUS WARNING

Dear Inter.net Canada client,

Beware: a type of email commonly known as "Spoof Mail" and containing a VIRUS is currently circulating.


This type of email is sent to you looking legitimately like it came from Inter.net Canada. It states that your account has been suspended and prompts you to open an attached form to re-enter your client information.


This is a scam email sent by ill-intended people and it contains a virus.


Important:


Do not open the attachment


Delete the email immediately (erase it from your delete box as well)


How to identify a spoof email:

1. Legitimate emails from Inter.net Canada always come from info@ca.inter.net.

2. Inter.net Canada never prompts you to fill an attached form. Instead we would ask you to access your account from our website.

3. Inter.net Canada"s bottom signature always includes the true registered name: Inter.net Canada. Spoof emails often guess your provider"s name using your email domain. For example, if your email domain is @ca.inter.net, a spoof email will likely refer to you as a CA client and will sign the spoof email accordingly.


Thank you for your attention to this matter.


Sincerely,

The Inter.net Canada Team


[See the whole message with all its requisites and the source code in Attachment 5.]


If this message was not sent to all customers, but only to me (or few other customers), it represents just a cover-up, intended to avoid legal lawsuits for submitting computer viruses to clients, or, maybe, someone among the Inter Net Canada"s employers was sending viruses, and the administration was aware of that.


A week later, such malicious messages began to arrive indeed, but, contrary to Inter Net Canada"s claim, they were coming from info@ca.inter.net, and were signed properly, too.


From 20 of July, 2006, till August, 16 (almost a month!) I had everyday Internet interruptions (or no Internet-access at all), and called Inter Net Canada"s customer support service around 15 times. This time I did not sent them emails, seeing that they ignore all my emails, but used to communicate by phone. Multiple promises to restore my Internet-access were just words: interruptions continued, and in the beginning of August, 2006, I had no Internet-access at all for 5 or 6 days in a row. However, instead of an apology, explanation, and bonus (or money-return), they responded (Wed, 05 Jul 2006 05:04:22 -0400) by an email from their marketing department, promoting their services for business people. [See: Attachment 5.]


In the beginning of August, 2006, I called Inter Net Canada, and said that if my access to Internet will not be restored, and no free month of services (a bonus) or money return will be given, I"ll call a lawyer.


However, instead of responding directly to the complains, they sent me an email, claiming that the interruptions are happening because Inter Net Canada is upgrading its equipment:


Return-path:

Envelope-to: leog@total.net

Delivery-date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 08:15:07 -0400

Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=mail.nasc.inter.net)

by app1.nasc.inter.net with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #2)

id 1GBVus-0005Mi-06

for leog@total.net; Fri, 11 Aug 2006 08:15:06 -0400

From: Inter.net Canada

To: leog@total.net

Subject: Important Service Upgrade Announcement

MIME-Version: 1.0


Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="boundary_000_002C_123BABG.4A7D6BA0"

Message-Id:


Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 08:15:06 -0400

Status:

--boundary_000_002C_123BABG.4A7D6BA0

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit


Dear Customer, Important Service Upgrade Announcement We are writing you, our loyal customer, to let you know of an extremely short service interruption required to enable a state-of-the-art network platform and provide you with some great email feature enhancements. [See the whole message in Attachment 5.]


It is very significant that no dates of alleged possible interruptions were given here; no details, and no time frame. [See: in Attachment 5.]


For me, this period of " an extremely short service interruption" lasted a full month! If they recognized that the interruption was their fault, and was caused by Inter Net Canada"s internal reconstruction, they were obliged to give me a bonus (at least, 1 month of free services), or to return back the monthly payment, but Inter Net Canada"s billing department, technical support department, and administration have ignored all my demands, never apologized, never responded by an email message or by a post mail, never contacted me in this case, and never paid me a compensation. I can provide all Inter Net Canada"s bills for that period of time, which prove this.


1.10. In 2007, all problems have migrated from 2006 to the new year: thousands of spam messages; systematic and massive viruses" attacks; problems with sending and receiving the emails; interruptions of the Internet access, and so on...


However, seeing no reaction from Inter Net Canada to my complains, I almost exclusively communicated with them by phone. Only in the end of 2007 I started to send my complains by the emails again: because the difficulties to reach Inter Net Canada by phone have dramatically amplified. In one in this few messages (August, 2007) I reported to Inter Net Canada's technical support:


1) my free european internet e-mail boxes are blocked

(speed is falling down to almost "0", while other sites

are working just fine!!!!)

2) I'm paying for fast internet, but the speed is

around 56; when my friend came with his modem -

it was the same; however, when he contacted

HIS internet provider from my home - it

worked perfectly!

3) 4.5 thousands e-mail messages has

accumulated in my leog@total.net e-mail box:

I deleted them through web mail tool, but in

5 minutes the previous number of

messages (4.537) appear again; when I

use a mailer program to download

messages and delete them from the server,

it crashes;

4) virus attacks come every day non-stop;

I lost 2 comps because of this....

(23 August, 2007).


For weeks I was no able to connect to Internet properly (without interruptions, permanent difficulties, and no Internet-access for 2-5 days). This happened in April and May, 2007 (see below):


In May, 2007, the Internet was completely down (I had no Internet-access at all) on the 1-st and 9-th of May, 2007. The 1-st May is an International Workers" Day, and the 9-th of May is the Victory Day in Russia. Shutting down my Internet-access on these 2 dates was an obvious political provocation.


Besides, I received the viruses from the Internet connection driver, which means, to my knowledge, that the viruses were coming from Inter Net Canada.


However, all complains were ignored again: no money return; no bonuses; no apology.


1.11. In the beginning of 2008 I sent my complains directly to Inter Net Canada"s administration, but received no response.


Besides all other problems, which migrated from 2006-2007 to 2008, there was a complete blockage of my particular emails" sending, which contained a particular topics or particular email addresses. For example, when I was complaining to my friends about Inter Net Canada"s sabotage, such an email was blocked. (See below [1 July, 2008]).


It is not clear, why the "Internet Address" was changing during my emails sending procedure,

but I was not disconnecting the Internet, and did not do anything besides sending an email.

I deeply believe that it was a systematic Inter Net Canada"s humiliation.


But this was just the beginning, because since the 1-st of June, 2008, someone (or something)

was gradually shutting down my whole email correspondence. In the beginning of July, 2008,

only some rare emails could go through an invisible barrier, and, most of the time: none. I almost

completely switched to mail.ru, and other free email services, because my personal correspondence from leog@total.net (my Inter Net Canada"s email address) was blocked.


My correspondents were not receiving my emails, which began to come back in dozens of returned mails. Simultaneously, hundreds of other returned mails were arriving to my email box: emails, which I never composed and never sent. And, because I had the best anti-virus software on my system, and, besides, almost daily was scanning my computer by several other anti-viruses and Trojan removers, and because I knew, how to remove the dangerous intruders manually, and systematically did it, I believe that I did not have a hidden proxy server or a mass mailing virus on my system, and, therefore, someone had to send all these messages directly from Inter Net Canada"s server with my requisites and my email address. Most of such messages bear email ddresses with co.il in the end.Since the beginning of June 2008 I was also receiving tons of emails with provocations, death threats, or provocative scam from senders, whose emails had co.il or ru in the end.


More and more of such terrorist emails were written in a non-European language, which corresponds to co.il.


My complains to Inter Net Canada were ignored again, and the deprivation of Internet-access, of the right to communicate with the outside world, and the severe violations of other rights continued.


(See below few samples of the lists of such malicious return and provocative emails).


Tenth of thousands of spam messaged and returned emails have practically stopped the Inter Net Canada"s email service for me, but Inter Net Canada was ignoring the complains as before.

11-12 September, 2008 (the date of 9-11 terrorist attacks!)


I had no Internet-access at all, which repeated on 29-30 Sep. 2008 (see the screen capture images below):


Obviously, the "login failed" message has nothing to do with my computer system, drivers, or another kind of my personal problems, and was originated by the internal Inter Net Canada"s server"s error. And this, in turn, excludes any problems on my side.

Since 25 of October 2008 I could not connect to Internet again most of the time. (See the typical network error message again [30 October, 2008]).


When I called (several times) the customer support, I received no explanation, no apology, and no instructions how to repair this problem.


But even when the Internet was (rarely!) working for an hour or 2, I could not send, receive, or read the email messages, or to browse Internet. See the most typical messages below:


And, from 2-nd to 5-th November, 2008, the Internet-access did not work at all, and we did not have Internet for 3 days. Taking in consideration that mine and my wife"s birthday is falling on one of these days, it is very possible that by shutting down our Internet-access on the day of our birthday someone sent us a sinister message. (See below [4 Nov. 2008]).


Continued in the next file.

To Whom It May Concern


From Lev Gunin


DECLARATION 2019-2021


PART 2


2.1. The problems with the Internet-connection have continued in the beginning of 2009 as well. From 27 to 30 Mar. 2009 we did not have Internet again. It was a very cunning, well-calculated, and intentional act of sabotage, because the Internet-access was shut down for us 27 of March after dark (Friday evening), when the weekend began, and the technical support was not accessible by phone. [See the screenshot below (29 Mar. 2009).]


Only on the 30 of March (2009) the Internet started functioning again.


I called the billing department of Inter Net Canada, the technical support, demanding a rebate,

bonus, or money return for Internet-failure, but received no money, no explanation, and no

apology.


Since May, 2009, I started to use almost exclusively free email accounts, an alternative Internet access, and often browsed the Internet at my friends. The reaction to my new methods of breaking through the virtual house arrest was quick and significant: they restored their services

for me; stopped the sabotage of the Internet-access, and made no artificial problems for several

months. (Still, the spam and viruses" attacks, and thousands of bogus "returned emails"

persisted.) It is possible that someone did not want to lose an access to my correspondence and to

my browsing history.


However, I suggest that the main reason of why the sabotage was temporarily stopped is the

replacement of Inter Net Canada"s services by Uniserve"s services. From May, 2009, to

December, 2011, I had no major problems with both Internet-access and sending emails from my

leog@total.net mailbox. Obviously, while Inter Net Canada was temporarily acting as Uniserve,

the persecutions have been partially suspended.


Internet and email interruption disappeared.


These changes have been reflected by my modem"s data as well:


[the copy of the modem"s data was removed in this version, but present in the full version, and

can be provided on request]


To check - to what extend will now expand someone"s tolerance, - I even decided to revive my ancient web pages, and sent a request, pretending that I don"t remember how to do it. I received a quick and efficient response (cardinally different from my whole previous experience). (See below).


However, the access to my web pages did not work, and was never restored. I was never given an access to them again.


In the end of November, 2011, I received a post mail with an announcement that the Inter Net Canada was re-established in eastern Canada, and "will now be your internet service provider".


As soon as Inter Net took over, all previous problems and persecutions have reappeared again at a higher scale.


2.2. Since January, 2012, the Internet-access sabotage, email services interruptions and my

personal emails filtering, systematic Trojans-viruses attacks, etc.: have been re-established

together with the re-establishing of the Inter Net Canada"s services.


Since 2 February, 2012, sending of any email was impossible because was interrupted by various

popping out windows; for example, be the next window (see below):


After re-entering the user name and password I could not send the email anyway, because the same messaging window popped out again infinitively (see below):


(Both pictures correspond to 24 May 2012.)


I sent 10 or 12 mail messages to Inter Net Canada"s technical support and administration, and even contacted them through their web formulary (see below; February, 2012):


The very fact that I was never contacted after sending this message speaks clearly about itself.

Some of the messages claimed that my emails have been blocked because I am "not using" the cookies. However, my cookies settings were set to standard (default).


I tried to send my emails from different browsers and from different computers, but, since the beginning of May 2012, the sending operation was constantly blocked:


The wide viriaty of very different messages about the reasons of emails blockage (especially, the alledged user-password failure) exclude problems on my side, but indicate a grave technical problem or a sabotage at Inter Net Canada"s side.


In addition, a proceedure of sending an email was often interrupted by the mail mainteinence window (see below):


If I clicked on Perform Maintenance Operations, or Skip Maintenance - the result was the same: a next popping out window used to appear - a user-password error, a "time-out" message, or "Your Internet address has changed", or a message about the cookies, - and the email was blocked anyway.


The most unusual and thing used to happen in 2012, when - during my email sending operation - my modem page suddenly appeared (see below):


Naturally, I ignored this, and did not enter anything before disconnecting the Internet, but, faster than I could do anything, the log window of my modem used to appear (see below), which happened 5 or 7 times in 2012, and never before and after:


[in this version modem"s data is removed, but can be provided on request]


In 2012 I used standard browsers (Opera, Firefox, and Internet Explorer) with the standard settings. The problems with sending emails have dropped almost to "0" in the beginning of 2013 without any changes on my side.


2.3. Simultaneously, the Internet-access itself was also blocked for days since January 2012. I was doing many tests, and came to a conclusion that even when Internet worked it was unstable, unreliable, and frequently disconnected very often.

11-12 Feb., 2012, we had no Internet access for 2 days again. First, my email service was completely blocked since 10 February 2012. Here (below) is a copy of my complain to Inter Net Canada, sent before the full disconnection of Internet:


---------------------------------------------------------------------


Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2012 15:16:22 -0500 [11/02/12 03:16:22 PM EST]

From: Where Email issue inquiries are received via web or created by agents via RT

To: leog@total.net

Reply-To: emailsupport@ca.inter.net

Subject: [ca.inter.net #7160]

AutoReply: Contact from INTER.NET website


Greetings,

This message has been automatically generated in response to:

"Contact from INTER.NET website",

a summary of which appears below.


There is no need to reply to this message right now. Your ticket has been

assigned an ID of [ca.inter.net #7160].


Please include the string:

[ca.inter.net #7160]

in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. To do so,

you may reply to this message.


Thank you,

Inter.net Canada

-------------------------------------------------------------------------


name: Lew

last Name: Gunin

language: English

email: leog@total.net

phone: 514-xxxxxxxx

address:

city:

postalCode:

province:


message:

Since Feb. 10 I can not

access my web mail account

(Firefox browser)

I was unable to contact you.

Your telephone line is always busy.


order-service: support@ca.inter.net

<----- Department requested support:

rtr.cainet.emailsupport@fibernetics.ca

the

Date is : Saturday February 11th 2012

the

Time is : 3:14 PM


Posted From : http://www.ca.inter.net/contact.php

Script processed by : /app/app_contact.php?lang=eng

User Host : ip-32.87.126.206.dsl-cust.ca.inter.net

User IP : xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Users System info : Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:8.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/8.0.1

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Was it occasionally that Internet stopped working (around 16:30, 11 February, 2012) (right after the submission of this complain!)? It looks like a punishment for complaining. Instead of restoring my access to my email box they disconnected me from Internet!


And, again, the same pattern has been used again: I was disconnected from the mail server, and then from Internet for the weekend, when the technical support is not available. This is the proof that someone was disconnecting me deliberately.


In spite of my protests and demands of compensation, I was charged the same 34 dollars as usually.


However, this time I received, at least, an apology, and the admission (recognition) of the interruption of services (see below):


2.4. In March, 2012, the Internet-access was formally working, but de facto is was down, because during each Internet-session multiple disconnections occurred, and each time I had to initiate the dial-up process entering my user name and password again and again, and so from the beginning to the end of March.


2.5. On the 1-st and 9-th of May 2012 the Internet worked only 3-4 hours per day, and the rest of the day was down. The provocations from the internet provider on 1-st and 9-th of May have repeated almost every year, and this became a very significant pattern.


The 1-st of May is the International Workers Day, and the 9-th of May is the Victory Day in Russia and Belarus. So, if someone (or a group of individuals) was targeting me on these particular dates, a guessable profile of such a person must be: 1) fascist; 2) anti-leftist right-wing extremist; 3) Rusophob.


However, whoever in Inter Net Canada or Bell Canada was behind this series of provocations - knew nothing about me, i.e. did not know who I am, what are my views, and why I am targeted, because, by some of my views, I am closer to the right-wing agenda, while, by some other views, I can be closer to the left parties" agenda, and in no way I am a pro-Russian (or pro-German, or pro-anything...) activist, because I have my own, independent and no-country-related views and opinions. And, if so, I had to be deliberately misrepresented by someone else (my real enemy) to this terrorist-sabotage-maker, in term to unleash someone"s anger against something and some people - on me.


My calls on May 7-11, 2012, to Inter Net Canada"s technical support were just ignored, but (looking as a punishment for my complains) the complete disconnection of Internet followed right after my calls: no Internet access from May 14 to May 16 (included), totally almost 3 days.


All possible venues were explored to fix the problem: no one worked. Inter Net Canada sent a ticket to BELL, and BELL's technician came, installing a splitter that divided phone and Internet lines. However, when he left - Internet was still not working. He called then from the street, and said that going to check connections at our local circuit. Then he called again, and asked, if Internet is working.


However, Internet was still not working (disconnected). The technician has never called back after his last call, and the Internet access was still unavailable, which means that the splitter and local circuit check did not solve the problem. And only after another 40 minutes Internet suddenly re-established itself, as if something was re-connected at Inter Net Canada's or BELL's main office.


In response to my inquiry about the technical problems that caused our Internet-access failure and interruptions I received the next message:


Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 11:09:43 -0400 [11:09:43 AM EDT]

From: Support Dept. via RT

To: leog@total.net

Reply-To: emailsupport@ca.inter.net

Subject: [ca.inter.net #14716]

AutoReply: Bell Technician Update


Greetings,

This message has been automatically generated in response to:

"Bell Technician Update",

a summary of which appears below.


There is no need to reply to this message right now. Your ticket has been

assigned an ID of [ca.inter.net #14716].


Please include the string:

[ca.inter.net #14716]

in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. To do so,

you may reply to this message.

Thank you,

Inter.net Canada

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hello Mr. Gunin,

I apologize if the e-mail was not sent yesterday, however please see below with

the exact update from Bell technician with regards to your internet issue:

BH=00.00;BM;instal ptsp,dmarc, transfert sur oslam, sans frais/Rempl. ca/pr

pour HV (plus performante) 4- AUTRE-INCONNU

These might be a technical jargon for you, but like what we have discussed they

have installed Pots Splitter on the Demarcation and transferred it to a

different SLAM.

Should there be any questions, please let us know. Thank you!

Sincerely,

Gail F.

Inter.net Canada

1.855.440.1444

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


It was enterd in my diary (2012) by then (here is a quotation):


"So, both ca.inter.net and BELL claimed that the technical glitch is now fixed, and the problem is solved with the splitter installation.


However, it was not solved, as on May 20, 2012, Internet stopped working properly again. I sent an e-mail to ca.inter.net help center, but never received any response.


In the light of just another Internet interruption, there is a juridical issue of questioning an assumption that an artificial interruption of Internet-access on May 14-16, 2012, could be used as a pretext (an excuse) to install a non-common 3rd-party electronic devices in our apartment, which did not repair a technical glitch, and, apparently, were not needed for re-establishing an Internet-access.

Internet did not work properly for other 2 days: May 30 and 31 2012.


The connection to Internet was being interrupted every 2-3 hours. We could connect to Internet after each interruption, but soon the connection was cut off again. We called ca.inter.net on 31 May 2012, looking for answers (reference number 1967441); however, no one explained what was going on and why the Internet connection was not stable for 2 days.


Since May 25, 2012, also my account at ca.inter.net web mail does not work properly. The process of composing new emails and reading and responding to received emails was compromised by pop-out windows with messages like "Your Internet address has changed since the beginning of your Mail session. To protect your security, you must login again", or "Please, log in again to resume composing your message. If you are NOT using cookies and you are composing messages in pop-out windows, you will have to log in again in your main window as well. This is to keep attackers from hijacking your session ID. We apologize for any inconvenience".


In some cases, my composed messages stay, but in other cases they disappear, and I have to start composing an email from the scratch.


I suggest that this was not the browser issue: because 1) Opera, Aurora, Firefox, and Explorer browsers gave the same glitch; 2) before May 25, and after June 1 everything came to normal again.


I've also noticed a kind of a censorship on my ca.inter.net's web mail. If my message contains a phrase like "I have difficulties to receive and send emails", or "my Internet is not working properly": such a message will disappear from the screen, never arrive to its destination, or arrive with an unreadable "gibberish" text.


When - on June 1, 2012, - I logged into my web mail account, a pop-out window informed: "Last login: Thu 31 May 2012 07.08.18 PM EDT from www.calltekcenter.com."


I can suggest that it means - an inter.net employee tried to check my web mail account's function ability from the call center after my complaint. However, I needed a confirmation that the calltekcenter.com is really inter.net's site, and not a malicious intruders' joke. Sadly, I never received any response from ca.inter.net.


Well, if we suggest that www.calltekcenter.com IS ca.inter.net"s web site, even then the question, who and why has accessed my web mails, is still actual.


On May 31 2012, when I called inter.net to report Internet connection interruption, I also told about the web mail's malfunctions (as I was not given any special reference number for this separate issue, it must be the same reference number 1967441). I also sent a message to inter.net, attaching 3 screenshots, and expecting to receive a response in writing or a call. However, no one responded or called."


2.6. In my Diary (2012), I continued in June 2012 (quotation again):


" JUNE 2012


On June 3, 2012, the Internet connection stopped working from 12.00 or 12.30. a.m.


On the modem, the light Power was on, Ethernet was flashing, and lights DSL and Internet were down. I called ca.inter.net calling center, reporting the problem (reference number 1967631).


After all the check and investigations, the Internet connection was not restored. When I resumed talking to ca.inter.net's employee, I've decided to check my modem's parameters. That was not possible, due to modem's request for modem's (not Internet) user name and password.


However, I never entered any "user name and password" in my modem's setup. This must have been done by someone else! But who could block my modem from me, its owner? A home intruder? Or a ca.inter.net technician who has an access to my modem through the service?


I immediately dialed ca.inter.net and spoke with the same gentlemen (reference number 1967631), calling my modem's locking outraged and demanding to unlock it. Ca.inter.net's employee confirmed that ca.inter.net technicians locked my modem, and said that they are going to give me the user name and password to access the modem. He said "wait", disconnected for a moment, and then said that he cannot give me the password right away, but that someone will call me the following day. I said that locking a private (not rented!) modem by an ISP from modem's owner is "sabotage", and disconnected.


Then I disconnected my modem from the wall socket (from Internet) and checked the local area connection. It did not work. I made a full reset through the "hole" on the back of the modem and returned it to its factory default. The local area connection was immediately reestablished, as well as the DSL light (when reconnected to Internet line).


However, going through a new setup, I discovered that the modem is blocking further setup operations until administrator's name and password is entered. But I never entered an administrator's name and password, which means that by default, the modem's factory configuration allows skipping this stage if unwanted. That brings to an inevitable conclusion that someone or something - a very knowledgeable technician or an automatic device - rewrote modem's firmware scripts. Near 4 am I finally got an Internet connection, which was lost in 10-15 minutes, when the modem was reset again to restrict it from an Internet access!


When I tried to reconnect, a message said "Authorization failed".


I managed to break into modem's setup in spite of "user name - password" lock (my suggestion that it was firmware's original appeared to be correct), and discovered that instead of

"maxleog@ca.inter.net" the user name was "leog@total.net". .... was set to 0,38, instead of 0,35. To save time, I omit other "mistakes" in the setup.


Thus, my modem was indeed reconfigured by someone to block an internet-access.


When at 11.40 pm I tried to connect to Internet again, the DSL light was down again.


At 12.00 (noon) I checked the Internet access again. It did not work. I did a modem's connectivity check, and received the following message: DLS - OK, ATM - OK, Ethernet - OK, PPP - down.


The same problem occurred before last BELL's intervention. It means that nothing has been improved with new BELL's devices installation, and that it has nothing to do with previous Internet interruptions.


When - after noon - I called ca.inter.net again, I was told to check the settings of my modem, but was not able to access the modem - it was locked again! When asked if ca.inter.net could lock modem out of me by changing its user name - password, ca.inter.net's worker did not deny the possibility, but stressed that it would violate customer's privacy law.


However, when ca.inter.net is recording customers' calls without their allowance (consent), it is the same level of privacy violation. ISP's employee suggested 3 types of "user name - password" combinations ([Admin-zoomadsl] - [Administrator-password] - [Administrator - "blank"]), but none of them worked. I did another attempt to reset the modem through the hole at the back of the modem: this time without success.


I asked the ca.inter.net employee to call me back in 10-15 minutes, in a hope that I'll be able to find a solution. With no big expectations, I typed "ca.inter.net" as a password. It didn't work. I removed "ca", leaving inter.net, and it worked! Instead of 15-20 minutes, I waited 1 hour, then 2, and 3, and nobody called me from ca.inter.net. Was an employee, whom I was speaking with, told not to call me back?


Around 18.30, I called ca.inter.net again.


This time a person, who spoke to me, was aggressive, inpatient, and rude. I had an impression that he was instructed in advance how to behave with me when answering my call (or it was someone, who was very angry that I cracked the modem"s last password, and unlocked the device). He just did not want to listen to my story, and rejected a very possibility that an ISP can change modem's user name and password remotely, without being connected directly to the modem. However, I know from people, who work for Internet companies, that technically it possible. (Not mentioning that I experienced it myself just few hours ago! And, besides, I received a confirmation - that it possible - from another ca.inter.net's technician). I also learned the same from other experts and from other sources.


He demanded not just my modem's name, but its specific model and even a serial number as well. I had to insist really hard, before he told me that he needs modem's model number for specific configuration at ISP's side. The issue about the serial number was somehow lost in the discussion, and did not come out any more. I asked experts, and they suggested that it's unlikely that modem's exact model number is needed for configurations at ISP's side, but needed for further violation of my privacy, and for hacking into my modem. And, definitely, modem's serial number is not needed at all, and a request for it is a further violation of client's privacy." (End of quotation.)


______________

Because of all the violations by Inter Net Canada, I started to record conversations with INC"s technicians, and, if needed, I can provide the most important talks" (mentioned above) wave files.


2.7. As I already mentioned before, I sent a request to Inter Net Canada, demanding an explanation of an unauthorized access to my web mails, which was never answered by Inter Net Canada. Below is the full text of my message, concerning this issue:


Sent: Problems with the Web Mail: reference N 1967441 (3 of 3)

Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2012 03:34:44 -0400 [03:34:44 AM EDT]

From: leog@total.net

To: help@ca.inter.net

Subject: Problems with the Web Mail: refference N 1967441

1 unnamed 0 KB

From leog@total.net


Problems with the Web Mail: refference N 1967441


Please, check the attachment.


There are 3 screenshots - 2

provide a log in glitch, and

the 3-rd is a concern: what is

calltekcenter, and what it's

doing with my e-mail? I-ve

never visited calltekcenter.com

or sent e-mails there.


My best regards,

Leon GUNIN


2 unnamed 0 KB


[Attachment stripped: Original attachment type: "image/jpeg", name: "Ca.inter.net_Web.Mail-Problem_2012_May24.jpg"]


3 unnamed 0 KB


[Attachment stripped: Original attachment type: "image/jpeg", name: "Ca.inter.net_Web.Mail-Problem_2012_May25.jpg"]


4 unnamed 0 KB


[Attachment stripped: Original attachment type: "image/jpeg", name: "what-is-calltekcenter-.jpg"]

__________


However, it wasn't the last non-authorized intrusion into my email box, because next time I discovered that home.sweetim.com has accessed my emails.


2.8. The next message source speaks for itself, and does not need any further explanation [see in: Attachment 6 (Junk Store) Summary of junk emails blocked - 1 Junk Emails Blocked].


3.1. Since the beginning of 2013, the sabotage of the email, Internet, and phone services became even more vicious. 23-24 Jan. 2013, our Internet was not working since midnight (22-23 Jan. 2013). I made a call to Inter Net Canada, but the Internet-access was not fully restored till 24 Jan. 2013. And, again, I received no compensation, no explanation, no apology.


My emails to well-known activists and journalists were sabotaged (according to all indications) by Inter Net Canada. Here is just one of innumerous examples. 18 Apr. 2013 I submitted a complain to Inter Net via their web form, copying the content of the returned or filtered emails, and stressing that "None of my e-mail recipients received my e-mails in 5 days". Besides, I copied a message from Total Net, which, I suggested, related to this matter. Inter Net Canada"s robot sent me the Problem Report with the confirmation that my message was received and with the quotation of my complain [see the full text in: Attachment 6].


[Inbox: [ca.inter.net #34833] AutoReply: [Problem Report] deliveries failed, etc. (1 of 21) PersonalUnseen - Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 01:25:28 -0400 [01:25:28 AM EDT] - From: Support Dept. via RT - To: leog@total.net - Reply-To: emailsupport@ca.inter.net - Subject: [ca.inter.net #34833] AutoReply: [Problem Report] deliveries failed, etc.]


I received the next response from Inter Net Canada:


Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 02:59:27 -0400 [02:59:27 AM EDT]

From: Maxine Gillamac via RT

To: leog@total.net

Reply-To: emailsupport@ca.inter.net

Subject: [ca.inter.net #34833] [Problem Report] deliveries failed, etc.


Hello Lew,

Good Day!


Thank you for your email. By the looks of it these are Spam and Phishing emails, please disregard any email that will say its from Total.net, Our Company is now called Inter.net Canada and if we send an email or notification via email the sender should show the name of our company, toll free number and our website and sometimes the name of the representative that sent you the email. We also don't ask personal information through email, so please do not reply or give out any of your information so whoever is sending those phishing emails wont have access to your email account. Also, we are having issue with Spam emails for the past 2 weeks, our Systems Department is already working on this case so please bear with us. Rest assured that this will be rectified soon so please be patient with us. Thank you for understanding and for your consideration.


Should you require further assistance, please feel free to give us a call or send us an e-mail. We are open 24 hours a day and 7 days a week.


Thank you for your continuous support of our products and services.


Sincerely, Maxine


Customer Service Support Inter.net Canada

Toll Free: 1.855.440.1444 W: www.ca.inter.net


----------------


As we can see, the copies of the source code of the returned or filtered (by Inter Net Canada) emails, which I submitted in my complain, were treated as "Spam and Phishing emails", while only the last of several samples was from alleged total net technician, and was added by me only because it could be a clue to the general roots of the sabotage.


The main point of my complain (that Inter Net Canada is applying a politically-motivated filtering to my correspondence, and that the source code probably reveals it) was not just lost or ignored, but twisted and consciously misrepresented.


For example, one of the quoted emails was stopped and not delivered by Inter Net Canada, allegedly, because of its "too big volume" [Diagnostic-code: lmtp;550 5.2.3 Delivery failed: Message too large], but the message itself was miniscule (which can be seen in the source code), and the attachment did not exceed Inter Net Canada"s limits (it was only 7 meg). Consequently, the nature of such a reaction to this complain is an evidence of Inter Net Canada"s wrongdoing.


I responded to this message [ca.inter.net #34833] [Problem Report] deliveries failed, etc.] by another complain, in which I contested explanation and claims of " Maxine Gillamac via RT emailsupport@ca.inter.net", and pointed that the problem must be solved, but, instead of responding adequately, M-me or M-e Gillamac (if such a person is really exists) sent the next message:


Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 02:59:43 -0400 [02:59:43 AM EDT]

From: Maxine Gillamac via RT

To: leog@total.net

Reply-To: emailsupport@ca.inter.net Subject: [ca.inter.net #34833]

Resolved: [Problem Report] deliveries failed, etc.


According to our records, your request has been resolved. If you have any further questions or concerns, please respond to this message.


----------


This was such a bold obsolesce that I could not believe my eyes.


2.8. The next message source speaks for itself, and does not need any further explanation [see in: Attachment 6 (Junk Store) Summary of junk emails blocked - 1 Junk Emails Blocked].


2.9. The number of returned emails, which I never composed and never sent, were on the rise again, while when there were Uniserve services, for 2 years I did not have such a problem. I don"t know if my discovery (6 Aug. 2013) that the site https://webmail.ca.inter.net accessed my mailbox when I was not in front of my computer, and could not open my emails, may prove this, but it is possible that the spam messages were sent from Inter Net Canada"s server in my name, which may be confirmed by a number of email sources. Here is an example of such spam samples allegedly sent from my email box (see in: Attachment 6).


3.1. In the same period of time, my friends and acquaintances told me that my phone number is like "blocked". Many times, after dialing my number, they heard a long beep, followed by a busy signal, as if the call was disconnected; or an automatic voice was telling that such a number does not exist.


All given facts are just samples, because countless infinitive problems occurred every day and almost any hour.


For example, since 28 Sep. 2013 Inter Net Canada"s email service, and then the Internet were not working at all for us. I submitted my complain via Inter Net Canada"s online form:

"Today, September 28, 2013, I can not access my e-mail account leog@total.net at ca.inter.net since 11.00. When I type my user name leog@total.net, and the correct password, it says that the user name and password don't match.


Please, send me in writing an explanation: a) what happened, why my e-mail is blocked; b) when it will be unblocked; and c) why so many of my e-mails send from my e-mail address are missing.


Is that glitch has affected exclusively my e-mail account, or it was a general glitch on ca.inter.net server?

In addition, I have to inform you that before the php page with my e-mails becomes inaccessible, it appears, then blinks and disappears, and only after a message about wrong password or user name appears.


Waiting for your response,

Leon (Lev) Gunin".


(See below)


(the confidential information was removed)


In response, a report was generated by Inter Net Canada"s robot:


Inbox: [ca.inter.net #44292] AutoReply: Contact from INTER.NET website PersonalUnseen Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2013 13:01:40 -0400 [01:01:40 PM EDT]

From: Support Dept. via RT

To: leog@total.net

Reply- To: emailsupport@ca.inter.net

Subject: [ca.inter.net #44292] AutoReply: Contact from INTER.NET website


Greetings,

This message has been automatically generated in response to:

"Contact from INTER.NET website",

a summary of which appears below.

There is no need to reply to this message right now. Your ticket has been

assigned an ID of [ca.inter.net #44292].

Please include the string: [ca.inter.net #44292] in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. To do so, you may reply to this message.


Thank you, Inter.net Canada


-------------------------------------------------------------------------


name: Lev

lastName: Gunin

language: English

email: leog@total.net

phone: 514-xxxxxxxxx

address: xxxxxxxxxxxx

city: Montreal

postalCode: Hxxxxxxxx

province: Quebec

message: Today, September 28, 2013,


I cannot access my e-mail account leog@total.net at ca.inter.net since 11.00.

When I type my user name leog@total.net, and the correct password, it says that the user name and password don\'t match. Please, send me in writing an explanation: a) what happened, why my e-mail is blocked; b) when it will be unblocked; and c) why so many of my e-mails send from my e-mail address are missing.

Is that glitch has affected exclusively my e-mail account, or it was a general glitch on ca.inter.net server?

In addition, I have to inform you that before the php page with my e-mails becomes inaccessible, it appears, then blinks and disappears, and only after a message about wrong password or user name appears.

Waiting for your response,

Leon (Lev) Gunin


order-service: support@ca.inter.net

<----- Department requested support:

rtr.cainet.emailsupport@fibernetics.ca the

Date is : Saturday September 28th 2013 the

Time is : 12:27 PM

Posted From : http://ca.inter.net/contact.php

Script processed by : /app/app_contact.php?lang=eng

User Host : 199.91.213.159

User IP : xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Users System info : Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:8.0.1)

Gecko/20100101 Firefox/8.0.1


--------


Finally, I received the next message from Inter Net Canada"s technical staff:


Inbox: [ca.inter.net #44292] Contact from INTER.NET website (12 of 18)

PersonalUnseen

Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2013 03:50:18 -0400 [29/09/13 03:50:18 AM EDT]

From: Amanda Sirett via RT emailsupport@ca.inter.net

To: leog@total.net

Reply-To: emailsupport@ca.inter.net

Subject: [ca.inter.net #44292]

Contact from INTER.NET website


Hello,

Good Day!

Thank you for your e-mail,

We apologize for the e-mail service disruption we had earlier, we can assure you that everything has been fixed on our end and you may now access the web mail.

If you have any questions or concerns please do contact our support line or reply to this e-mail.

Thank You.

Amanda S.

Customer Support Representative

Inter.Net Canada

1-855-440-1444

www.ca.inter.net


-------


It is impossible to understand (from this message) if the "e-mail service disruption" occurred only for us, or for all Inter Net Canada"s customers as well; my demands and requests (to explain, what happened, why, and how, and why so many of my e-mails - sent from my e-mail address - are missing).


Besides, when I received this response (Sunday, 29 Sep. 2013), my email was still blocked.


However, the same day (29 Sep. 2013), after 16:00, the Internet was interrupted 3 times for 1-1,5 hours, and started to work normally only at 7:00 30 Sep. 2013 (I checked it at 6:00, and it was not working). It is very suggestible that the disconnection of Internet was like a punishment for my complain about the disruption of the email service.


The next screenshots provide a suggestion about the violation of the privacy law (and, possibly, other norms) by Inter Net Canada (see below):


More checks in the beginning of 2014 raised even greater concern about possible violations ofthe privacy law and customers" rights by Inter Net Canada (see 2 more screenshots below):


It must be taken into consideration that from 2006 to 2014 I was systematically followed, surveilled, stopped, interrogated, and even searched by police, and this forced me not to go out from my home too often. In such a situation, an only link to the outside world was the Internet, email, and the phone line. However, due to the systematic interruptions of my phone line and Internet, this also was under an attack.


As almost every year, the email service, and then the Internet-access were interrupted on 1 and 9 of May, 2014 (see above), which, as I already noticed, had to be a politically-motivated action. However, this time the email service did not work or did not work properly from 9 May 2014 to 26 May 2014. When the webmail became accessible, I found in the mailbox a message from Inter Net Canada, dated 19 May 2014 (see below):


In no way it was an authentic Inter Net Canada"s official message. Its layout, structure, and the message composition (and template) is different from any other typical message from Inter Net Canada. It was sent from g.ucla.edu, which is a university server, not ca.inter.net. However, it repeated dozens of the similar official Inter Net Canada"s messages, which goal was to justify permanent disconnections, disruptions, sabotage, and filtering.


I checked the link, provided in this message, not from home, but from a public computer, and the antivirus software instantly prompted a threat. Of course, I did not log in, and terminated the Internet session.


But the pages u1lt.net/ca.inter.net looked exactly like the official Mail Maintenance Operations Inter Net Canada"s page, with all the buttons and design similar. And - because it arrived when I was really disconnected from normal email and Internet services: it could be treated as ca.inter.net"s (Inter Net Canada"s) cover up operation.


The first confirmation (that it was indeed Inter Net Canada"s provocation) came on 5 Sep. 2014 (after 17:00), when an identical message arrived from the same of another university"s web site. It also informed about "improving our mail services", and commanded to "upgrade" the account. But, when I clicked on it with the left mouse"s button (to open in a new window and copy to the HD), this email instantly disappeared from my email box, as if I clicked instead on "delete" in the web browser.


(Such disappearances of email messages have started only later: in 2016.)


The next confirmation that the email back on 19 May 2014, and its clone on 5 Sep. 2014 could be interpreted as Inter Net Canada"s provocation: was the instant disconnection from the universities" websites (from the academic Internet), which started on 9 Sep. 2014. And, because it happened around the date of 9-11 (like the systematic disconnections on the 1-st and 9-th of May), it sends another symbolic projection of someone"s criminal mind.


I believe that the constant disconnections and disruption of services by Inter Net Canada caused an irreparable damage to my younger daughter"s (who was still living with us by then) mental health, but the disconnection from the Universities" Internet has affected her especially harsh, because, studying psychology at McGill (one of the most complicated and difficult discipline (subject), she was desperately needed a reliable uninterrupted connection with her university"s email, faculty, researches, databases, materials, and teachers. I also believe that this was the most difficult period of her academic year, and that this disconnection harshly affected her studies.


In my complaint to Inter Net Canada (first via the web form, then by an email) I wrote (see below):


From Leon (Lev) Gunin, Inter.net customer, leog@total.net


Dear Inter.Net"s Customers" Support!


Today, September 9, 2014, we"ve been disconnected from all Montreal universities" web sites.

All other web sites, like Facebook, Hotmail, Google, Yahoo, YouTube, Automotive, La Presse, Devoir, TVA, TQS, Cragg, etc. - are working fine.


However, when trying to access any of university pages (for example, umontreal.ca), we"re receiving identical browser messages "The connection has timed out".


We used 10 different browsers with the same unsuccessful result.


We also attempted to break through to university pages from 7 different computers, one by one, using no rooter.


A computer from work and another computer from university, configured by professionals, also could not display any web pages of any of Montreal"s university.


Internet connection with universities must be restored immediately, as doctorate studies, scientific research, etc. - ultimately depend on it.


Yours truly,

Leon Gunin


This submission via web form was followed by the submission by an email, which generated an automatic response from Inter Net Canada (see below the screenshots):


[next page]


Next day I discovered that we were disconnected not only from Montreal universities" websites, but from all Quebec"s educational institutions, while the global academic Internet was still accessible.


Next day the Inter Net Canada"s staff did not contact us, and the disconnection from universities" Internet still continued, which forced me to send another complaint, in which I first quoted my previous conplaint, and then added (see below):


"After sending this e-mail, we also discovered the following:


1. 1 of our computer taken to a friend could access university web pages from a different IPS.

2. Universities from US, Ontario, or other Canadian provinces were not blocked, just Quebec"s educational web sites. Next day, September 10, 2014, around 10.15, I managed to contact Ca.Inter.net"s customer support via phone, and described the problem.


(Before calling Ca.Inter.net, I tried to access University of Montreal, McGill, Concordia, etc. web pages: they did not work).


Ca.Inter.Net"s employer could not explain the problem, and put me on hold. While waiting, I checked the accessibility of universities" web sites - and they suddenly started to work. It means that during few minutes of my conversation - with Inter.Net"s customer service - someone "turn on a switcher", and restored our access to Quebec educational web sites.


My request is:

1. I demand to disclose information on what exactly happened and why (& how) we were disconnected from universities" web pages in Quebec.

2. I must know why our browsing is permanently censored and internet services are too frequently sabotaged, and the modem & e-mail-box hacked: as the last disconnection from educational web sites has revealed a bigger problem.

Yours truly, Leon (Lev) Gunin

---------


In spite of the urgency, and in violation of the general and internal Inter Net Canada"s norms, there was no response from Inter Net Canada during 7 (!!!) days.


This alone could be interpreted as a deliberate sabotage.


I"ve contacted Inter Net Canada by phone 3 times during these 7 days, but every conversation with Inter Net Canada"s technical support was disconnected after 11-12 second, and my further attempts to call Inter Net Canada were in vain, like if our phone number was disconnected at Bell"s level from Inter Net Canada"s contact phone line.


I invited a friend, who was a specialist in Net connections, and, after inspecting the problem, he came to a conclusion that the academic Internet was blocked for us on our Internet-provider"s level. Among other tests, he ran the "trace" test.


I also took my modem and one of our portable computers to a friend (10 Sep. 2014), and successfully connected from there the web browser to McGill"s university web site. This was just another confirmation that the access to academic web sites was blocked in on our ISP provider"s level.


Only on 15 Sep. 2014, we received an email from Inter Net Canada"s technical support staff (see the screenshots below):


I ran the tracert immediately after receiving this email (15 Sep. 2014), but it did not show, where we"ve been disconnected.


Still, I sent a screenshot to Inter Net Canada.


Next day (16 Sep. 2014), I received another email from Inter Net Canada (see the screenshot below):


[next page]


This was not the first time, when the Inter Net Canada claimed that the problem is "resolved" when in reality (de facto) it was not resolved. We still could not connect to Quebec"s educational institutions" web sites and email service, including McGill. The claim that my request "is resolved" was false.

In response, and in disagreement, I sent another complaint (see below):


The access to universities" web sites (to the academic Internet) was fully restored only on 22 Sep. 2014, and, again, as always before, we received no compensation, no discount, no explanation of what happened, and no apology from Inter Net Canada.


I also believe that Inter Net Canada deliberately delayed the 2-nd response and the mentioning about the "tracert" test from 9-th till 15 Sep. 2014, because, probably, something told them that on this date (15.09.2014) we could not trace Inter Net Canada"s involvement in the sabotage of the academic websites, or they did something to for camouflaging it.


When my friend ran a similar test, I was not quick enough for asking him to do a screenshot, and, unfortunately, lost one of the most valuable material evidence.


In 2014, I did not complain to Inter Net Canada as often as before about even the most serious interruptions of the services (because of multiple personal problems, and my health"s rapid decline since 2013), but - all the same - even the rare reports about the most outraged events in 2014: testify about the systematic deprivation of my rights to be connected to the outside world.


For example, since 2012 the spam filtering tool did not work for me (was sabotaged by Inter Net Canada), and this forced me to file a complaint. (I could not access this tool from my email account, and had to log into my web account, from where it worked, but, after several days, the spam settings used to disappear). I pretended that I have no idea how to set the spam filtering: to see Inter Net Canada"s reaction (see below):


Inbox: [ideal-access.com #59136] AutoReply: [Problem Report] How to filter spam? (2 of 27) PersonalUnseen


Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 09:24:43 -0400 [27/06/14 09:24:43 AM EDT]

From: Support Dept. via RT

To: leog@total.net

Reply-To: emailsupport@ca.inter.net

Subject: [ideal-access.com #59136]

AutoReply: [Problem Report] How to filter spam?


Greetings,

This message has been automatically generated in response to:


"[Problem Report] How to filter spam?",

a summary of which appears below.


There is no need to reply to this message right now. Your ticket has been

assigned an ID of [ideal-access.com #59136].


Please include the string:

[ideal-access.com #59136]

in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. To do so,

you may reply to this message.


Thank you,

Inter.net Canada

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

This problem report was received from 23.91.186.12. The user clicked

the problem report link from the following location:

https://webmail.ca.inter.net/horde3/services/prefs.php?app=horde

and is using the following browser:


Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.0.2)

Gecko/20030208 Netscape/7.02


I wonder if there is an option to indicate

spam addressats for blocking them.

Near 100 spam e-mails per 1-2 days -

this is a real sabotage of my e-mail

functions.


However, I never received any response from Inter Net Canada to my request: nor by an email, nor by phone.


But right after my message (27 Jun. 2014), the access to my emails at Inter Net Canada (leog@total.net) was completely blocked the same day. And, because no response to my complaint followed, the disconnection of the email service by Inter Net Canada WAS their response (i.e. a punishment for my request).


Here (below) is how Inter Net Canada justified this (one of innumerous others) disconnection (end of June beginning of July, 2014):


Inbox: [ideal-access.com #59450] AutoReply: Compromised Email (2 of 69) Personal


Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2014 20:37:45 -0400 [01/07/14 08:37:45 PM EDT]

From: Support Dept. via RT

To: leog@total.net

Reply-To: emailsupport@ca.inter.net

Subject: [ideal-access.com #59450]

AutoReply: Compromised Email


Greetings,

This message has been automatically generated in response to:

"Compromised Email",

a summary of which appears below.


There is no need to reply to this message right now. Your ticket has been

assigned an ID of [ideal-access.com #59450].


Please include the string:

[ideal-access.com #59450]


in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. To do so,

you may reply to this message.


Thank you,

Inter.net Canada

-------------------------------------------------------------------------


Hi,

Good day!

This is in reference to our conversation earlier regarding your email address

leog@total.net. Said email address got compromised/put on hold due to some

malicious activities that the system has detected. We have already changed the

password and sent a request to have the email address reactivated with the new

password. Please give it at least 24-48 hours. We will be calling you back for

any updates but you can try logging in again tomorrow and see if it will

already work before we can call you back.


Should you require further assistance, please feel free to give us a call or

send us an e-mail.


Thank you for your continuous support of our products and services.

Sincerely,

Jamie


Customer Service Support

Inter.net Canada

Toll Free: 1.855.440.1444

W: www.ca.inter.net


------------


This message is a solid confirmation of all my previous suggestions: that someone among Inter Net Canada"s employees (or, rather, a CEO or a member of administration) was systematically breaking into my webmail account, and sent spam messages pretending that they were submitted from leog@total.net account.


I mean only a small portion of such spam (which was sent in my name from Inter Net Canada"s server, but with a different - than mine - IP address), because the majority of the spam messages were sent with a forged (leog@total.net) return address, but from different other servers, not from Inter Net Canada. This all together means that I had (and, probably, still have) a group of criminal-minded adversaries not only abroad, but also here, in Canada.


My email box was blocked not 48 hours (as warned this Inter Net Canada"s message), but the whole week, till Monday, 7 Jul. 2014, and I was refused a compensation again.


To Whom It May Concern

From Lev Gunin

DECLARATION 2019-2021


PART 3


3.2. One problem, which was appearing frequently from time to time in the previous years, in February-May 2015 became an everyday issue. It was an unusual opening of Inter Net Canada"s email web pages, striped of their normal design, layout, graphics, and formatting. Css, js, png files were not loading, which made the email page strange, unusual, difficult to use. Only the html code was loading, without the buttons and proper formatting.


One day everything was normal, and all the necessary files loaded orderly. Another day (or another time) ca.inter.net web mail page was twisted again. This used to occur in all browsers, in all modes. I tried to set browser"s settings to default, but it changed nothing. Right before the ca.inter.net"s webmail page, and immediately after any web site"s pages loaded properly, with no errors, which is a prove that it had nothing to do with the browser.

I reported this error to Inter Net Canada"s technical support, but never received any explanation or even a response to my complaint. Here (see below) is how the same email looked one day 6 Feb. 2015, and next time (when I did not delete this email, and opened it online for reassessing, because it was definitely a spam message):


Comparing these 2 screenshots, we can see the difference and the unacceptability of such an error. The second (to the right) looks exactly as a web page (only HTML) saved to the hard disc, while it was displayed during an online Internet-session.


In general, the sabotage of our access to Internet and mail services was combined in 2012-2015 with systematic disconnections of our phone line, and the infinite disruptions of my phone calls. This tells about the systemic persecution on both Internet-access - phone-line levels.


The systematic refusals (by Inter Net Canada) to explain, why a disconnection (of Internet, or email, or user-password combination failure, or another disruption of our connection to the outside world) occurred, and what exactly happened: is (in my opinion) a solid proof of the systemic sabotage.


In 2015, my health has deteriorated even more (partially due to systemic sabotage of the Internet-email services, systematic intimidation by police, and other persecutions), and I did not react to many of the disruptions of our Internet-email access. However, I think that (in the first half of 2015) the sabotage of our Internet-access was objectively diminished, and, because simultaneously, in the end of 2014 (or in the beginning of 2015) the stoppings (interceptions) and questionings by police ceased (while the surveillance still continued): it could happen due to Harper"s government"s demission.

However, on May 1 and 9 the disruptions of the email service again occurred, as in the previous years, and on 8 June 2015 my access to my emails was completely blocked.


Here is the complaint (8 Jun. 2015) to Inter Net Canada (see the screenshot below):


[next page]


However, this time the access to my emails was restored relatively quickly (see below):


Another problem, which also frequently occurred from time to time in the previous years, but became - in February-May 2015 - an everyday issue, was a disappearance of the received emails from my leog@total.net"s mailbox at ca.inter.net. One of the deleted by such a glitch emails was a response from ca.inter.net to my complaint (see above) sent on 9 Jun. 2015 about the inaccessibility of my emails.


I made a report to Inter Net Canada about this issue, and sent it via the web form, and by an email, but never received any response.


Here (see below) is my letter to ca.inter.net about the disappearances of the emails from my email box:


I received the next response to my complaint:


Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 21:28:47 -0400 [10/06/15 09:28:47 PM EDT]

From: Jay Germo via RT

To: leog@total.net

Reply- To: emailsupport@ca.inter.net

Subject: [ideal-access.com #74955] Your e-mail has been deleted


Hello Leo, Inter.net won't delete emails automatically specially if those are legitimate.


There's no option to retrieve deleted emails in webmail.

Regards, Jay Customer Service Inter.net Canada

Toll Free: 1.855.440.1444

W: www.ca.inter.net


Translated to our everyday language, it means that, according to Jay Germo"s (if such a person really exists) words, the problem I reported could not happen, or, to put it in a different way, he claimed that it did not occur. But, if so, it means that I am a liar?!


Interestingly, as in a number of fake messages, allegedly, from Inter Net Canada, the clause


Reply-To: emailsupport@ca.inter.net


- is composed with the emailsupport@ca.inter.net between the lines, while almost all of other messages from Inter Net Canada don"t have this feature.


Translated to our everyday language, it means that, according to Jay Germo"s (if such a person really exists) words, the problem I reported could not happen, or, to put it in a different way, he claimed that it did not occur. But, if so, it means that I am a liar?!


This response (#74955) by Jay Germo also deliberately misinterpreted my request, because I was asking not about "retrieving the deleted emails in webmail", but about a copy of own Inter Net Canada"s message, which copy should reside in their database. A legal term of such a behavior must be defined by a jurist or by a court.


More than that: this time an accompanied (followed) message from ca.inter.net (Inter Net Canada) gave a clue, how all other deceptive messages that "the problem was", allegedly, solved (while it was not solved at all) were generated:


Inbox: [ideal-access.com #74955]

Resolved:

Your e-mail has been deleted (9 of 25)

PersonalUnseen

Mark as:

This message to:

Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 21:29:11 -0400 [10/06/15 09:29:11 PM EDT]

From: Jay Germo via RT

To: leog@total.net

Reply-To: emailsupport@ca.inter.net

Subject: [ideal-access.com #74955]

Resolved: Your e-mail has been deleted


According to our records, your request has been resolved. If you have any further questions or concerns, please respond to this message.


Was it an occasion, or a deliberate punishment - that next day (10 Jun. 2015) the Internet-access and webmail were shut down for us from 10:30 or 11:00 a.m., and we could not access the Internet? On 10-11 Jun. 2015, twice, the Internet-connection was established twice for 20 and 40 minutes, but the email service remained unavailable, so I could not send a complaint via the webmail, and the www.ca.inter.net page could not be opened, so I could not send a problem report via the web form as well.


I called Inter Net Canada (ca.inter.net) innumerous times, waiting up to 2 hours for a response, but no one answered my calls, so, the phone connection to Inter Net Canada"s technical support operators was also not available.


3.3. Simultaneously, my modem-access to www.ca.inter.net was also blocked, seemingly, by the Inter Net Canada (see the screenshots below):


[11:12:06] The Internet Explorer also gave the same message...


See further images below:


Since 13 Jun. 2015, our phone line was dysfunctional, and, again, it happened on weekend (Saturday), when the phone company operators could not be reached.

However, in spite of the proper reaction by Primus, the phone line was not functioning well to the end of June.


In July (02.07.2015) I contacted Primus again, but our phone line still did not function normally. The Primus technician (1888 216 6615 technical primus; 5645209) told me that it must be a technical problem at Bell"s premises.


29 and 30 2015 the ca.inter.net"s server was disconnected every time I was accessing my emails (see below):


In this particular period of time Inter Net Canada started to send emails with an unprotected personal information, like the next message (see an extract below):


Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2015 08:30:39 -0400 [08:30:39 AM EDT]

From: Support Dept. via RT

To: leog@total.net

Reply-To: emailsupport@ca.inter.net

Subject: [ideal-access.com #74915]

AutoReply: Contact from INTER.NET website


Greetings,

This message has been automatically generated in response to:

"Contact from INTER.NET website",

a summary of which appears below.


There is no need to reply to this message right now. Your ticket has been

assigned an ID of [ideal-access.com #74915].


Please include the string:

[ideal-access.com #74915]


in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. To do so,

you may reply to this message.

Thank you,

Inter.net Canada

-------------------------------------------------------------------------


name: Lev

lastName: Gunin

language: English

email: leog@total.net

phone: xxxxxxxxxx

address:

city: Montreal

postalCode:

province: Quebec


[end of quotation]


-----------


Was it a coincident - that exactly in June-September 2015 (and later) the spam emails with the "medical" content began to correspond to my visits to medical specialists? For example, after visiting a rheumatologist, I received a spam email "joints pain remedies" (2 Sep. 2015), and so on. (Samples can be provided on request).


Was it a coincident that since 10-11 Sep. 2015 (again on the date of 9-11 terrorist acts) the Internet-access has stopped working (how many times and how many years in a row!) again?


To be more precise: the disruptions of Internet began 3 Sep. 2015 (the Internet was not working during the whole day, and only after midnight was sometimes reestablishing for 10-15 minutes, and at night, from 10 to 11 Sep. 2015, the Internet was completely shut down.


(See below the screenshot of my complaint to Inter Net Canada):


[see the next page]


Below is the tracing test, which adds just another (the technical) layer to these images:


3.4. This time, 12 Sep. 2015, Inter Net Canada sent us a technician, who presented himself as a "Bell"s technician", and performed some technical procedures inside our apartment and outside, at the connections inside the switch-box in the backyard. In our apartment he touched and did nothing, but only inspected 2 of our computers, writing down their brands, models, and also wrote down the brand, model, and the serial number of the modem.


We did not see his ID or a proof that he was a technician from Bell indeed. When he left, our telephone line was still working, but after his manipulations outside, in the switch-box, immediately stopped working, and was disconnected for a number of days. On the 12 Sep 2015, the Internet was still working (when the phone line was already dead), but stopped working after 13 Sep. 2015, too. This had seriously affected my daughter"s studies and her mental state, and caused another deep blow to my personal health.


Here (below) is my problem report to Inter Net Canada (ca.inter.net) [see the screen shot]:


Here (below) is the automatic response to a problem report generated by Inter Net Canada"s robot:


13 Sep. 2015 I filed a complaint to Bell and Primus companies (see its copy below):


Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2015 21:39:35 -0400 [09:39:35 PM EDT]

From: leog@total.net

To: accessible@bell.ca

Cc: support@primustel.ca

Bcc: customer.care@primustel.ca

Subject: Re: Restore our phone line


To BELL and Primus

Bell Canada

CP 8716, Succursale A

Montréal, Québec

H3C 3P3

1 800 667-0123

accessible@bell.ca

_________________________


Primus Canada

Technical Support

1-800-370-0015

support@primustel.ca

Customer Care

1-800-806-3273

customer.care@primustel.ca


Dear Sir or Lady!


Because of systematic, permanent and persisting problems with Internet access, our Internet provider contacted BELL, and September 11, 2014, BELL's manager told on the phone that next day, Saturday, September, 12, 2015, a technician from BELL will come from 12.00 to 18.00.


He came at 18.25, almost 30 minutes AFTER 18.00.


The only thing he did: he carefully studied our modem, its model and brand, all the connections to the modem, and from the modem to computers. However, modems and computers are not the specialty of BELL, and should not be examined and registered by a BELL's technician.


Besides examining the modem, he touched nothing in our apartment, but (as we could understand) has changed something in the switch-box outside.


Instantly after his visit our residential phone line has stopped working. There is no dial tone, and phone's display is signaling: no line.


In the same time, the Internet is working fine, with no interruptions for now.


It is easy to suggest that the technician has disconnected the analog line, in an attempt to increase the bandwidth of the digital line. Since another technician from BELL once installed a splitter that separated an incoming line for 2 different bandwidths, we have (for years) dry and wet lines inside our premises for Internet and phone separately.


Same evening, we contacted our residential phone line provider, Primus, and explained, what happened. The response was: we have to contact our Internet provider. However, our Internet provider's technical support is not working on weekends.


Then we called BELL, and the respond was the same. This is a clear mistreatment of a client, and, by any logic, an absurd policy. Whoever used to shut down someone's phone line is responsible for interruption of the service, and must restore it unconditionally. If someone deliberately or incidentally damaged another person's satellite antenna, or a cell phone, or anything else, is responsible for the damage, and this particular person, not someone else, must repair the damage.


Restoring our telephone line was a direct responsibility of Primus and BELL, not the Internet provider.


Now we demand: 1) to bring back our phone line; 2) money back from Primus for the whole period of our phone line inaccessibility, or compensation from Bell for disconnecting our phone line.


Yours truly,

Lev Gunin

September, 13, 2015.


-----------


The refusal to respond to my fair demand, ignoring it, was obviously a bold act of humiliation and human rights violation, and 14 Sep. 2015 I sent a new demand (see below):


[see the next page]


14 Sep. 2015, I called Bell and Primus innumerous times from public phones, and from my close ones" cellular phones. Besides, I sent my demand also by fax and postal mail (see below [for security purposes, the confidential data is masked here]):


As I received no response to my previous

request, I repeat my demand again.

Please, note that for security reason

I don't provide my telephone number,

which you can in a second retrieve from

the telephone book.


Dear Sir or Lady!


Because of systematic, permanent and persisting problems with Internet access, our Internet provider contacted BELL, and September 11, 2014, BELL's manager told on the phone that next day, Saturday, September, 12, 2015, a technician from BELL will come from 12.00 to 18.00.

He came at 18.25, almost 30 minutes AFTER 18.00.


The only thing he did: he carefully studied our modem, its model and brand, all the connections to the modem, and from the modem to computers. However, modems and computers are not the specialty of BELL, and should not be examined and registered by a BELL's technician.

Besides examining the modem he touched nothing in our apartment, but (as we could understand) has changed something in the switch-box outside.


Instantly after hid visit our residential phone line has stopped working. There is no dial tone, and phone's display is signaling: no line.


In the same time, the Internet is working fine, with no interruptions for now.


It is easy to suggest that the technician has disconnected the analog line, in an attempt to increase the bandwidth of the digital line. Since another technician from BELL once installed a splitter that separated an incoming line for 2 different bandwidths, we have (for years) dry and wet lines inside our premises for Internet and phone separately.


Same evening, we contacted our residential phone line provider, Primus, and explained, what happened. The response was: we have to contact our Internet provider. However, our Internet provider's technical support is not working on weekends. Then we called BELL, and the respond was the same. This is a clear mistreatment of a client, and, by any logic, an absurd policy. Whoever used to shut down someone's phone line is responsible for interruption of the service, and must restore it unconditionally. If someone deliberately or incidentally damaged another person's satellite antenna, or a cell phone, or anything else, is responsible for the damage, and this particular person, not someone else, must repair the damage.


Restoring our telephone line was a direct responsibility of Primus and BELL, not the Internet provider.


Now we demand: 1) to bring back our phone line; 2) money back from Primus for the whole period of our phone line inaccessibility, or compensation from Bell for disconnecting our phone line.


Yours truly,

Lev Gunin

________________________________________________


By now, at noon (12.00), Sep. 14, 2015, I received no response to my message.


From 9.00 a.m. to 12.00, I was calling Primus Canada using my wife's cell phone.


Innumerous times, after entering 5144991294 on request of Primus's digital voice, I was receiving an audio announcement that this telephone number "is not in our system".


I hope that I am not deliberately disconnected from Primus's Technical Support and Customer Care services, and my calls are not deliberately blocked. Between 9.00 and 10.00, same day (Sep.14, 2015), I was speaking to our Internet Provider's technical support representative, and was told that the Internet Provider will not submit a demand for BELL's technician.


NOW WE WERE REFUSED BY ALL SIDES: BELL, PRIMUS and the INTERNET PROVIDER.


Does it means that we are not allowed to have a residential phone line any more, and that as Primus customers we are expelled from Primus, and our payments to Primus are ignored?

...............

14 Sep. 2015 the speed of Internet fell almost to "0", which can be interpreted as a deliberate punishment for my demand to restore our telephone line. We could not use the Internet and email, and I managed to submit only 1 email: to Inter Net Canada (ca.iner.net), with my next complaint (see below):

However, at 12:40 p.m. (14 Sep. 2015), after the innumerous attempts and "error" messages, I managed to send a copy of my above displayed complaint to Bell and Primus also via email (see below):

Meanwhile, concerning my last problem report (Internet-speed decreasing to almost "0") - an automatic problem response was generated by Inter Net Canada"s system (see below its copy):


Now we demand: 1) to bring back our phone line; 2) money back from Primus for the whole period of our phone line inaccessibility, or compensation from Bell for disconnecting our phone line.


Yours truly,

Lev Gunin

_____________________________


By now, at noon (12.00), Sep. 14, 2015, I received no response to my message.


From 9.00 a.m. to 12.00, I was calling Primus Canada using my wife's cell phone.


Innumerous times, after entering 5144991294 on request of Primus's digital voice, I was receiving an audio announcement that this telephone number "is not in our system".


I hope that I am not deliberately disconnected from Primus's Technical Support and Customer Care services, and my calls are not deliberately blocked. Between 9.00 and 10.00, same day (Sep.14, 2015), I was speaking to our Internet Provider's technical support representative, and was told that the Internet Provider will not submit a demand for BELL's technician.


NOW WE WERE REFUSED BY ALL SIDES: BELL, PRIMUS and the INTERNET PROVIDER.


Does it means that we are not allowed to have a residential phone line any more, and that as Primus customers we are expelled from Primus, and our payments to Primus are ignored?

...............


14 Sep. 2015 the speed of Internet fell almost to "0", which can be interpreted as a deliberate punishment for my demand to restore our telephone line.


We could not use Internet and email [service], and I managed to submit only 1 email: to Inter Net Canada (ca.iner.net), with my next complaint (see below):


However, at 12:40 p.m. (14 Sep. 2015), after the innumerous attempts and "error" messages, I

managed to send a copy of my above displayed complaint to Bell and Primus also via email (see

below):


[see the next page]:


Meanwhile, concerning my last problem report (Internet-speed decreasing to almost "0") - an

automatic problem response was generated by Inter Net Canada"s system (see below its copy):


Inbox: [ideal-access.com #88782] AutoReply: Extremely Slow Internet Speed and Home

Phone Line Disconnection (1 of 67) PersonalUnseen


Mark as:

Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 13:03:45 -0400 [01:03:45 PM EDT]

From: Support Dept. via RT

To: leog@total.net

Reply-To: emailsupport@ca.inter.net

Subject: [ideal-access.com #88782]

AutoReply: Extremely Slow Internet Speed and Home


Phone Line Disconnection


Greetings,

This message has been automatically generated in response to: "Extremely Slow Internet Speed and Home Phone Line Disconnection", a summary of which appears below. There is no need to reply to this message right now. Your ticket has been assigned an ID of [ideal-access.com #88782].

Please include the string: [ideal-access.com #88782] in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. To do so, you may reply to this message.

Thank you, Inter.net Canada


-------------------------------------------------------------------------


Dear emailsupport@ca.inter.net!


Today, September 14, 2015, I was speaking with ca.inter.net representative, referral Nr. 2043259, discussing our residential phone line disconnection immediately after Bell technician's visit on ca.inter.net's demand.


I was told that ca.inter.net will not send a demand to Bell for our phone line reconnection - as Bell and Primus both insist as a condition for restoring the phone line.


As for the details, I have asked ca.iner.net representative to send me (via email) a written explaination for this refusal. However, in spite of her promise to send me such a statement right away, I did not receive anything. I believe that Bell and Primus are responsible for our phone line disconnection, and MUST restore it unconditionally. In the same time, I need a written ca.inter.net's statement in this matter, as an exit from a technical and administrative limbo. In addition, I'm also asking you to investigate a problem with our Internet speed. Since 12.00, we are not able to use the Internet normally because it became extremely slow.


My best regards,

Lev Gunin

.................


However, immediately after the submission of my problem report to Inter Net Canada, and my

complaint to Bell and Primus, the email service was abruptly disconnected (see below):


Interestingly, an access to Internet, and to Inter Net Canada"s web site was still working, and I

could log in to my general user"s account, and to send a problem report:


The response from Primus (which I could obtain-retrieve only when the email service was restored) was absolutely ridiculous and inacceptable. Here is its text copy (below):


Inbox: RE: Restore our phone line (8 of 73) PersonalUnseen

Mark as:

Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 14:21:44 -0400 [02:21:44 PM EDT]

From: customer.care@primustel.ca

To: leog@total.net

Subject: RE: Restore our phone line

Priority: Normal


яЛПHello Lev Gunin,


This refers to your recent inquiry regarding your account with Primus Costco. We regret to inform you that we are unable to answer your inquiry due to insufficient information to locate your account.


Please reply to this message including your telephone number with the area code or your account number with Primus Costco and we will gladly respond to your inquiry in a timely manner.


Sincerely yours, Eric Email Response Associate Primus Canada Telecommunications ________________________________


From: leog@total.net

Sent: Sunday, September 13, 2015 9:39 PM

To: accessible@bell.ca Cc: support@primustel.ca Subject:

Re: Restore our phone line

To BELL and Primus Bell Canada

CP 8716, Succursale A MontrУ?al,

QuУ?bec

H3C 3P3

1 800 667-0123

accessible@bell.ca

_________________________


Primus Canada Technical Support

1-800-370-0015

support@primustel.ca

Customer Care

1-800-806-3273

customer.care@primustel.ca


Dear Sir or Lady!


Because of systematic, permanent and persisting problems with Internet access, our Internet provider contacted BELL, and September 11, 2014, BELL's manager told on the phone that next day, Saturday, September, 12, 2015, a technician from BELL will come from 12.00 to 18.00.


He came at 18.25, almost 30 minutes AFTER 18.00.


The only thing he did: he carefully studied our modem, its model and brand, all the connections to the modem, and from the modem to computers.


However, modems and computers are not the specialty of BELL, and should not be examined and registered by a BELL's technician. Besides examining the modem he touched nothing in our apartment, but (as we could understand) has changed something in the switch-box outside. Instantly after hid visit our residential phone line has stopped working.


There is no dial tone, and phone's display is signaling: no line. In the same time, the Internet is working fine, with no interruptions for now.


It is easy to suggest that the technician has disconnected the analog line, in an attempt to increase the bandwidth of the digital line.


Since another technician from BELL once installed a splitter that separated an incoming line for 2 different bandwidths, we have (for years) dry and wet lines inside our premises for Internet and phone separately.


Same evening, we contacted our residential phone line provider, Primus, and explained, what happened. The response was: we have to contact our Internet provider.


However, our Internet provider's technical support is not working on weekends. Then we called BELL, and the respond was the same.


This is a clear mistreatment of a client, and, by any logic, an absurd policy. Whoever used to shut down someone's phone line is responsible for interruption of the service, and must restore it unconditionally. If someone deliberately or incidentally damaged another person's satellite antenna, or a cell phone, or anything else, is responsible for the damage, and this particular person, not someone else, must repair the damage.


Restoring our telephone line was a direct responsibility of Primus and BELL, not the Internet provider.


Now we demand: 1) to bring back our phone line; 2) money back from Primus for the whole period of our phone line inaccessibility, or compensation from Bell for disconnecting our phone line.


Yours truly,

Lev Gunin

September, 13, 2015.


--------------------------------


This electronic message contains information from Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc. ("PRIMUS"), which may be legally privileged and confidential.


The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information is prohibited. If you have received this electronic message in error, please notify us by telephone or e-mail (to the number or address above) immediately. Any views, opinions or advice expressed in this electronic message are not necessarily the views, opinions or advice of PRIMUS. It is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that any attachments are virus free and PRIMUS bears no responsibility for any loss or damage arising in any way from the use thereof.The term "PRIMUS" includes its affiliates.


--------------------------------


Pour la version en franУ╥ais de ce message, veuillez voir


http://www.primustel.ca/fr/legal/cs.htm


...............


The sender of this response has deliberately "mutilated" my original message, erasing the header with my personal ID, home address, and my telephone number, pretending that I did not provide them.


While - in my 1-st message (13 Sep. 2015) - I was writing "Please, note that for security reason I don't provide my telephone number, which you can in a second retrieve from the telephone book", I soon sent 4 other messages 13 and 14 (in the morning) Sep. 2015, with my full personal ID, telephone number, etc.


This 1-st response from Primus Canada came Sunday, September 13, 2015, at 9:39 pm, when my 2-nd, 3-rd, and 4-th messages (with all my personal information, including the telephone number) were already submitted around 25, 20, and 12 hours ago.


(Not mentioning that the Primus Canada could indeed retrieve my phone number in seconds, but did not do it.)


It is extremely important that when I called Primus Canada from public phones, or from my wife"s cellular phone, an automatic voice, or a live Primus" operator said that an account corresponding to my telephone number "cannot be located in the system".


I immediately responded to this message, including my full name, address, and the repeated exhaustive complete description of the events and the problem into my response, and received another response from Primus Canada. This second message from Primus Canada again disregarded several of my repeated messages, quoting ONLY the 1-st one, and also completely ignored the content and the nature of even of my 1-st complaint, as if they communicated with me through a broken phone or simply did not read my messages. Here is its image (the screenshot) (see below):


And what if I don"t have, and cannot "provide an alternate contact number": my phone should be

disconnected forever?!


Here (below) are several other related documents, which must be also taken into consideration:


The access to my emails was still blocked:


And here (below) is a copy of the text of my response to the 2-nd message from Primus Canada [the confidential data is masked here]:


Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 16:13:10 -0400 [04:13:10 PM EDT]

From: leog@total.net

To: support@primustel.ca

Cc: customer.care@primustel.ca

Subject: RE: Restore our phone line


Responding your email:


Quoting "support@primustel.ca" :


[Hide Quoted Text]


Good Day Mr. Gunin,


Re : Account # 12037481


Thank you for taking the time to write to Primus Canada Customer Service Department.


My name is Rachel and I will be providing you the required assistance today! I regret to hear that you're experiencing issues with your service.


Please answer these questions so that I may open an investigation ticket:


We will apply the necessary adjustments in your account once home phone service is up and running.


Please provide an alternate contact number: instead, you have my email address leog@total.net


Please describe reported trouble:


TO BELL and PRIMUS

Bell Canada Primus Canada

CP 8716,

Succursale A

Technical Support

1-800-370-0015

Montréal, Québec support@primustel.ca

H3C 3P3

Customer Care

1-800-806-3273

1 800 667-0123

customer.care@primustel.ca

accessible@bell.ca

Fax 1-800-340-4919

From: Lev Gunin,

home phone (514) xxxxxxxxxx


[regarding no response from Bell and Primus, I'm forced to provide my telephone Nr. in this email; in case of a security security breach, the whole responsibility lays on you] _________________________


Mon, 14 Sep 2015, at 10:16:30, I sent the next message to BELL and PRiMUS Canada:


Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 10:16:30 -0400 [10:16:30 AM EDT]

From: leog@total.net

To: accessible@bell.ca

Cc: support@primustel.ca

Bcc: accessible@bell.ca

Subject: Re: Restore our phone line!


As I received no response to my previous request, I repeat my demand again.


Please, note that for security reason I don't provide my telephone number, which you can in a second retrieve from the telephone book.


Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2015 21:39:35 -0400 [09:39:35 PM EDT]

From: leog@total.net

To: accessible@bell.ca

Cc: support@primustel.ca

Bcc: customer.care@primustel.ca

Subject: Re: Restore our phone line


Dear Sir or Lady!


Because of systematic, permanent and persisting problems with Internet access, our Internet provider contacted BELL, and September 11, 2014, BELL's manager told on the phone that next day, Saturday, September, 12, 2015, a technician from BELL will come from 12.00 to 18.00.


He came at 18.25, almost 30 minutes AFTER 18.00. The only thing he did: he carefully studied our modem, its model and brand, all the connections to the modem, and from the modem to computers.


However, modems and computers are not the specialty of BELL, and should not be examined and registered by a BELL's technician.


Besides examining the modem he touched nothing in our apartment, but (as we could understand) has changed something in the switch-box outside.


Instantly after hid visit our residential phone line has stopped working. There is no dial tone, and phone's display is signaling: no line. In the same time, the Internet is working fine, with no interruptions for now.


It is easy to suggest that the technician has disconnected the analog line, in an attempt to increase the bandwidth of the digital line.


Since another technician from BELL once installed a splitter that separated an incoming line for 2 different bandwidths, we have (for years) dry and wet lines inside our premises for Internet and phone separately.


Same evening, we contacted our residential phone line provider, Primus, and explained, what happened.


The response was: we have to contact our Internet provider.


However, our Internet provider's technical support is not working on weekends. Then we called BELL, and the respond was the same. This is a clear mistreatment of a client, and, by any logic, an absurd policy.


Whoever used to shut down someone's phone line is responsible for interruption of the service, and must restore it unconditionally.


If someone deliberately or incidentally damaged another person's satellite antenna, or a cell phone, or anything else, is responsible for the damage, and this particular person, not someone else, must repair the damage.


Restoring our telephone line was a direct responsibility of Primus and BELL, not the Internet provider. Now we demand: 1) to bring back our phone line; 2) money back from Primus for the whole period of our phone line inaccessibility, or compensation from Bell for disconnecting our phone line.


Yours truly,

Lev Gunin


_________________________________________________________


By now, at noon (12.00), Sep. 14, 2015, I received no response to my message.


From 9.00 a.m. to 12.00, I was calling Primus Canada using my wife's cell phone. Innumerous times, after entering 5144991294 on request of Primus's digital voice, I was receiving an audio announcement that this telephone number "is not in our system".


I hope that I am not deliberately disconnected from Primus's Technical Support and Customer Care services, and my calls are not deliberately blocked.


Between 9.00 and 10.00, same day (Sep.14, 2015), I was speaking to our Internet Provider's technical support representative, and was told that the Internet Provider will not submit a demand for BELL's technician.


NOW WE WERE REFUSED BY ALL SIDES: BELL, PRIMUS and the INTERNET PROVIDER.


Does it means that we are not allowed to have a residential phone line any more, and that as Primus customers we are expelled from Primus, and our payments to Primus are ignored? __________________________________________________________


- Can you receive incoming calls?

- No.

- Can you make outgoing calls?

- No.

- Is there a dial tone on the line?

- No

(If NO)

- What do you get?

(If you get a stutter dial tone, please check for new voice mail messages)

- I get "no line" message

- When did the service get interrupted?

- at 18.30, September 12, 2015, instantly after Bell tecnician's visit on request of our Internet Provider.

- Have you unplugged all equipment from jacks and tested with one corded phone?

(Equipment includes faxes, modems, phones and any other type of equipment connected in a phone jack)

- Yes.

- Are all the phones down?

- Yes.

- Have you checked the battery on the cordless phones?

- Yes. H

- Have you verified at the demarcation point?

- Yes.

- Any further information you wish to add?

- Yes: There was no need to answer your stupid questions - as the problem was fully described in my previous email.

- Should we be required to dispatch a technician in order to fix this problem please confirm:

- I repeat: Bell's technician has disconnected our analog phone line (digital - Internet - is still working), and Bell has just to reconnect it. We will not pay for your technician's visit. However, we'll do anything possible to force you to compensate EVERY HOUR of our phone line disconnection, and all other moral and financial troubles.

- Date you would be available:

- 14 September 2015.

- Time you would be available:

- any time.

- It is important to note that should a technician be dispatched and therein it is confirmed that the problem is with the inside wiring or your personal phone equipment, you could be billed for the technician's visit which does start at 90.00$ Please confirm that you do agree to this stipulation.

- I repeat: we refuse to pay any fee, as it is your and Bell's responsibility to restore our phone line. I also demand to restore our access to Primus customer care telephone line.


[Hide Quoted Text]


With this being said, and trusting the above to your satisfaction, should you have other questions and/or concerns, remember you can always email us at: customer.care@primustel.ca.


It would be our pleasure to assist you further.


Again, thank you!


Primus Canada values your patronage and looks forward to being your source for all your telecommunication services.


Best Regards,

Rachel

Email Response

Associate Primus Telecommunications Canada

1-800-806-3273

Terms and conditions: http://primus.ca/index.php/que_en/terms-of-use


This message is virus free, protected by Primus - Canada's largest alternative

telecommunications provider, www.primus.ca


Are you moving or thinking of moving?

Please make sure you provide us with 30 days notice prior to your move to ensure a timely transition of service.


________________________________


From: leog@total.net

Sent: Sunday, September 13, 2015 9:39 PM

To: accessible@bell.ca Cc: support@primustel.ca

Subject: Re: Restore our phone line

To BELL and Primus Bell Canada

CP 8716, Succursale A Montréal,

Québec H3C 3P3

1 800 667-0123

accessible@bell.ca

_________________________


Primus Canada Technical Support 1-800-370-0015

support@primustel.ca

Customer Care 1-800-806-3273

customer.care@primustel.ca


Dear Sir or Lady!


Because of systematic, permanent and persisting problems with Internet access, our Internet provider contacted BELL, and September 11, 2014, BELL's manager told on the phone that next day, Saturday, September, 12, 2015, a technician from BELL will come from 12.00 to 18.00.


He came at 18.25, almost 30 minutes AFTER 18.00.


The only thing he did: he carefully studied our modem, its model and brand, all the connections to the modem, and from the modem to computers.


However, modems and computers are not the specialty of BELL, and should not be examined and registered by a BELL's technician.


Besides examining the modem he touched nothing in our apartment, but (as we could understand) has changed something in the switch-box outside. Instantly after hid visit our residential phone line has stopped working.


There is no dial tone, and phone's display is signaling: no line.


In the same time, the Internet is working fine, with no interruptions for now.


It is easy to suggest that the technician has disconnected the analog line, in an attempt to increase the bandwidth of the digital line.


Since another technician from BELL once installed a splitter that separated an incoming line for 2 different bandwidths, we have (for years) dry and wet lines inside our premises for Internet and phone separately.


Same evening, we contacted our residential phone line provider, Primus, and explained, what happened. The response was: we have to contact our Internet provider.


However, our Internet provider's technical support is not working on weekends. Then we called BELL, and the respond was the same.


This is a clear mistreatment of a client, and, by any logic, an absurd policy.


Whoever used to shut down someone's phone line is responsible for interruption of the service, and must restore it unconditionally.


If someone deliberately or incidentally damaged another person's satellite antenna, or a cell phone, or anything else, is responsible for the damage, and this particular person, not someone else, must repair the damage.


Restoring our telephone line was a direct responsibility of Primus and BELL, not the Internet provider. Now we demand: 1) to bring back our phone line; 2) money back from Primus for the whole period of our phone line inaccessibility, or compensation from Bell for disconnecting our phone line.


Yours truly,

Lev Gunin

September, 13, 2015.


--------------------------------


This electronic message contains information from Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc. ("PRIMUS"), which may be legally privileged and confidential. The information is intended to

be for the use of the individual(s) or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, be

aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information is

prohibited. If you have received this electronic message in error, please notify us by telephone or

e-mail (to the number or address above) immediately. Any views, opinions or advice expressed

in this electronic message are not necessarily the views, opinions or advice of PRIMUS. It is the

responsibility of the recipient to ensure that any attachments are virus free and PRIMUS bears no

responsibility for any loss or damage arising in any way from the use thereof.The term

"PRIMUS" includes its affiliates.

--------------------------------


Pour la version en français de ce message, veuillez voir

http://www.primustel.ca/fr/legal/cs.htm

...............


As we can see again, Primus Canada was stubbornly ignoring all my other messages (sent by email, web-form, fax, and postal mail), except of the very 1-st one, in violation of all my rights.


But the next message from Inter Net Canada is equally outrageous (see the screenshot below):


Here (below) is its text"s copy:


Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 16:51:00 -0400 [04:51:00 PM EDT]

From: Support Dept. via RT

To: leog@total.net

Reply-To: emailsupport@ca.inter.net

Subject: [ideal-access.com #88798] AutoReply: Change to Dry Loop


Greetings,


This message has been automatically generated in response to: "Change to Dry Loop", a summary of which appears below.


There is no need to reply to this message right now.


Your ticket has been assigned an ID of [ideal-access.com #88798].


Please include the string: [ideal-access.com #88798] in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.


To do so, you may reply to this message.


Thank you,

Inter.net Canada


-------------------------------------------------------------------------


Hello Leo Gunin,

You called in and was requesting to have your lines connected since a Bell technician disconnected it when we reported for an intermittent connection.


Basically, your line is already with Primus. I believe the Bell technician cut off the line since your internet still runs through the Bell line even after you've switched to Primus.


For all customers who has no Phone service with Bell we will be needing to install a Dry Loop line.


What is Dry Loop? Dry Loop is essentially a leased pair of telephone wires from the telephone company with no dial tone (voice services with Bell) active on the line. If you do not have a qualified traditional phone line, you will require a dry loop with your DSL service to run DSL service to your residence.


Should you require further assistance, please feel free to give us a call or send us an e-mail. Thank you for your continuous support of our products and services.


Sincerely,

Penny

Customer Service Support

Inter.net Canada

Toll Free 1.855.440.1444

W www.ca.inter.net

................


I responded to this outraged message by next response (see below):


Sent: Re: [ideal-access.com #88798] AutoReply: Change to Dry Loop (1 of 1)


Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 21:56:31 -0400 [09:56:31 PM EDT]

From: leog@total.net

To: emailsupport@ca.inter.net

Subject: Re: [ideal-access.com #88798] AutoReply: Change to Dry Loop


Good afternoon!


Thank you for your direct respond to my question.


And excuse me for having further requests, as your respond

has raised even more questions.


You wrote:


Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 16:51:00 -0400 [04:51:00 PM EDT]

From: Support Dept. via RT

To: leog@total.net

Reply-To: emailsupport@ca.inter.net

Subject: [ideal-access.com #88798] AutoReply: Change to Dry Loop

Your ticket has been assigned an ID of [ideal-access.com #88798].

Please include the string:

[ideal-access.com #88798]

in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue

Thank you,

Inter.net Canada

-------------------------------------------------------------------------


"Hello Leo Gunin,

You called in and was requesting to have your lines connected since a Bell technician disconnected it when we reported for an intermittent connection".


"Basically, your line is already with Primus. I believe the Bell technician cut off the line since your internet still runs through the Bell line even after you've switched to Primus".


-------- Excuse me, but I don"t understand, why ca.inter.net"s representative has "to suggest" ("to believe") about the reason of our phone line disconnection, instead of calling Bell (as customer"s representative), asking them what actually happened.


Next "suggestion", which sounds strange to me, is "after you switched to Primus". We did not "switch" to Primus. We never were with Bell. Our residential phone line provider was Sprint, which later became Roger, and then Primus. For 20 years, we stayed with the same phone service (which is not Bell), having the same telephone number, so why should our Internet run through Bell"s service? Concerning the material (technical) facilities: yes, they all belong to Bell, so, if we follow your logic, Bell has to cut off phone lines of all non-Bell customers?


Excuse me, but this is nonsense.


Plus, please explain to me, how could our Internet dry loop run through Bell"s services, if the signal"s splitter is installed indoor, not outside (in the switchbox). If our telephone line is hosted by Primus, and (as Primus service) provided from outside of our apartment, how can it become Bell"s service just because of a signal splitter within our apartment, i.e. INSIDE our domestic

(indoor) circuit?


And one more question.


If you suggest that "Bell technician cut off the line since your internet [dry loop] still runs through the "Bell line", why should he disconnect the wet (analog) loop (phone), instead of the dry loop?


I repeat: if it is the DRY loop (as you - probably, wrongly - suggest) that is "running through Bell", why had Bell to disconnect the WET loop?


Excuse me again, but this is nonsense.


"For all customers who has no Phone service with Bell we will be needing to install a Dry Loop line".


-------- According to your statement, all non-Bell residential phone line (landline) services provide a degraded (compared to Bell) phone lines, and, if so, they must all be closed, and their licenses stopped.


Did I understand you correctly?


To clarify this issue, please, answer another question: what is the difference between Bell and non-Bell landlines" service (residential phone line service)? Do literally ALL non-Bell customers need the installation of the dry loop line, or just those who have no landlines?


"What is Dry Loop? Dry Loop is essentially a leased pair of telephone wires from the telephone company with no dial tone (voice services with Bell) active on the line. If you do not have a qualified traditional phone line, you will require a dry loop with your DSL service to run DSL service to your residence".


"Should you require further assistance, please feel free to give us a call or send us an e-mail. Thank you for your continuous support of our products and services.

Sincerely,

Penny

Customer Service Support

Inter.net Canada Toll Free

1.855.440.1444 W

www.ca.inter.net"


-------- I see your statement (above) as an illegal method of money extortion. When the customers of former Total.net provider went from hands to hands - from Total.net that became Uniserve, and then Ca.inter.net - nothing was mentioned in renewed conditions or agreements about the dry loop installation.


In 2012, at night from May 10 to 11, a spam email arrived to our official ca.inter.net"s mailbox leog@total.net: "Due to your illegal activity the Internet-access will be blocked by your ISP. To avoid this you must contact us within 3 days".


On May 14, 2012, our Internet stopped working indeed.


Hours later, the telephone line was also disconnected.


After couple days with no Internet-access ca.inter.net has claimed that our Internet is not working due to phone line malfunction, and sent a Bell technician.


This technician came to us with a dedicated intention to install a signal splitter (which divides the main line to wet and dry loops). Despite my protests, he prepared everything for such an installation, after discussing the situation with someone on the phone. Then he told us that if we don"t allow installing the splitter, he has to "register" our "refusal of Bell services", and we will be left with no telephone and Internet running.


I had to allow the technician to install the splitter.


However, even after the installation, only the phone line was restored, but not the Internet. Bell"s technician called twice from outside, examining the switchbox, and finally concluded that the Internet line is working perfectly, but the access was blocked by our ISP through stopping the signal. One hour later our Internet suddenly came back.


We can conclude that, despite our disagreement, Bell installed for free this splitter on ca.inter.net"s request.


Did Bell and our ISP make us a favor, or was there a hidden motivation that we don"t know? It is hard to suggest, what interest our ISP had in arranging this installation of the splitter that we did not want.


Now, the same splitter issue has been used as a pretext to shut down our telephone line and Internet (because since noon, September 14, 2015, its speed became so slow that made our Internet-access useless).


Besides, 3 times during the same day, my access to my leog@total.net email box was blocked due to user name - password malfunction. Each time it happened in response to my demands to investigate our phone line disconnection.


Summarizing, I have to point out that - after the installation of the splitter in May (16), 2012, - the Internet is not running faster or better than before the splitter, and we"re facing permanent problems with both Internet and phone line. Paying around 35 dollars for only 3 mg /sec, and facing systematic disconnections and other problems with our Internet service is a tormenting experience.


Now, on top of this all - you want us to pay another 10 or 15 dollars for a dry loop monthly, and probably 20 or 30 dollars for its installation?


Aren"t you going too far?


Yours truly,

Lev Gunin

................


I received a very 1-st (and ONLY) detailed and clear explanation in years, and I guess that this happened just because legally in my case Inter Net Canada could fall into very deep trouble.


However, this "reasonable" and detailed "explanation" is telling an unbelievable story that, allegedly, when we escaped from Bell"s persecutions to Sprint, our phone number and our phone line was remained assigned with the Bell"s Circuit ID (which is suggestable from "explanation").


Bell has continued to sabotage our connection to the outside world by frequently disconnecting our phone line, which is obvious from Sprint"s letter (see: Internet-Emails-Sabotage--1997-2021-01.doc; 1.3.) in 2002, when our phone line was detached at Bell"s central office, where the wires were physically (manually) disconnected.


And, during almost 15 (!) years, when Sprint Canada was replaced by Rogers, and then by Primus: our phone was still assigned to a non-existing Bell"s Circuit ID. Even in 2012, when, according to Inter Net Canada"s "explanation", "Primus/Rogers migrated their customers with POTS phone to Digital Lines and thus separating their allegiance with Bell", our phone was still assigned with Bell, or, as Inter Net Canada"s technician state it: "There is a possibility that the physical wet loop line on the demarcation has not been disconnected so there would still be signal being fed on your house with internet service but the Circuit ID used before is no longer existing on Bell's database".


When all other Primus customers were transferred to another technology, I (together with my family) was a single customer, who was left (as befoe) with the "non-existing Bell"s Circuit ID".


It is absolutely impossible that no one in Bell, Primus, and Inter Net Canada companies did not know about such a peculiar, strikingly unbelievable situation, when one of their customers is assigned to a "non-existing Bell"s Circuit ID". So, they constantly lied to me, covering up the real reason of never-ending disconnections, disruptions, and the access blockage.


If the Bell"s technician has (as claims the "explanation" given below) indeed disconnected our phone for the reason of this "non-existing Bell"s Circuit ID" ("There is a possibility that the physical wet loop line on the demarcation has not been disconnected so there would still be signal being fed on your house with internet service but the Circuit ID used before is no longer existing on Bell's database that was why when the Bell technician found that the Circuit ID we submitted to them for repair no longer exist on Bell's database, they have disconnected it and causing the internet to be interrupted.) - then why he did not explain the reason of the disconnection, did not warn us about the matter of things and the disconnection itself, and just detached the wires; and why then another Bell"s technician, who, in spite of our disagreement, installed (end of May 2012) a splitter, also said nothing about this issue, and why HE did not disconnect the phone?


As we can see from Inter Net Canada"s statement below, Inter Net Canada"s technician only express the pure suggestions, using such words and expressions like "probably", or "there is a possibility", but not the affirmative statements, because Inter Net Canada had to call Bell, and to find out, what is really going on.


As we can see from the message above, they never gave a call to Bell and Primus, and never really investigated, why our Internet is not working or not working properly. However, considering the non-ending sabotage of the email service by Inter Net Canada, and other provocations and assaults, it is clear that ca.inter.net is a part of the persecution machine, and always disrupted my connections to the outside world in coordination with Bell and Primus.


[See the Inter Net Canada"s response below.]


Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 19:22:54 -0400 [15/09/15 07:22:54 PM EDT]

From: Gail Flores via RT

To: leog@total.net

Reply-To: emailsupport@ca.inter.net

Subject: [ideal-access.com #88798] Change to Dry Loop


Hello Leo, Good day!


I have consolidated your e-mail on one ticket so it would be easier for us to track your concerns.


I have reviewed your case as well and I guess you were asking for an explanation why the internet stopped working after the technician visit and why there is a mention about the Dry Loop service.


However, before we go further;


1.) The trouble about your speed issue on Friday returned to us today that there are no issues on the line and that your internet should be running fine.


However, if you have issue still please send us the results for the download and upload speedtests.


2.)About your Dry Loop service, this is a line that service data (internet) only without the voice (phone).


This is used if you do not have a phone service with Bell since we (Inter.net) are renting lines with Bell to provide you with the internet service.


3.) I understand you are only aware that your service provider before was Rogers and then Primus and etc.


I hope you know that as far as DSL service is concern Bell is the main provider and the other companies are just renting

lines from Bell.


4.) As for your case, Primus was a Reseller of Bell to provide POTS phone to residential customers. They were provided an Circuit ID that is an identification that the line is owned by Bell from the Central Office.


Technicians sent for these are only Bell technicians or contractors from Bell dispatch.


5.) Inter.net have taken that Circuit ID number when you signed up with Uniserve (previous internet service provider) so Bell would consider that the service would run on a Wet Line (POTS phone+data).


And that DSL service is what you have been running on and you are aware.


On your end it will just be Primus as your phone service provider however, how it is configured from the back-end is Primus to Bell. So the end of the line is still Bell.


6.) Sometime on 2012 Primus/Rogers migrated their customers with POTS phone to Digital Lines and thus separating their allegiance with Bell. Inter.net Canada cannot run the internet service on a digital line that is why we suggest the Dry Loop service because the line is not digital but would only carry internet without phone.


The Dry Loop line which will be installed would still be a rental line from Bell that is basically the reason there is an additional charge if you switch to Dry Loop because we are also paying Bell for it.


7.) I also understand that your service has been working since 2012 even after the migration to Digital Phone service from Primus.


There is a possibility that the physical wet loop line on the demarcation has not been disconnected so there would still be signal being fed on your house with internet service but the Circuit ID used before is no longer existing on Bell's database that was why when the Bell technician found that the Circuit ID we submitted to them for repair no longer exist on Bell's database, they have disconnected it and causing the internet to be interrupted.


8.) At the present time I can see that your internet service is still working though and you may want to confirm. However, since the Circuit ID is unidentified by Bell there is a possibility that if there are any issues/repairs needed next time, Bell would refused to do further action / repair.


9.) So we recommended the Dry Loop line that already is from Bell so when the time comes it needed a repair there shouldn't be any issues with it.


You might have any additional questions about this matter.


Feel free to reply to this e-mail if you have further issues.


Thank you!

Sincerely,

Gail F.


Inter.net Canada

1.855.440.1444

https://ca.inter.net


On Mon Sep 14 21:57:15 2015, leog@total.net wrote:


[see the next page]


An extract (a screenshot) from the given message above.


Our telephone was disconnected totally 3 weeks, and the Internet was also not working most of

the time.


I sent my demand for compensation to Inter Net Canada, Primus Canada, and to Bell Canada, but

received no compensation, no discount, no bonus, no free month of services (as I demanded), no

even a response, and no apology.


3.5. Meanwhile, since the 2-nd half of 2015, Inter Canada began to censor not only my emails,

but my access to the search engines (which already started themselves to block my access,

especially Yandex and Amazon), to academic web sites, newspapers and magazines, and to

political materials.


Here (below) is one of innumerous examples (7 Oct. 2015):


In October 2015 Inter Net Canada blocked my access to I2P+IP, banning Peers and IPs:


[this data has been removed in this version for security reasons]


..............


The Tor browser was also blocked by the ISP [16 Oct. 2015] (see below):


In addition:


Inter Net Canada was also refusing a number of other connections (see an example below) [24

Nov. 2015]:


15-20 Oct. 2015: a massive and coordinated attack by computer viruses.


On the 3-rd of November (my birthday!) the Internet stopped working, and was accessible only

3-4 times (till 5 Nov.2015), for 15-20 minutes.


20-21 Nov. 2015 the webmail service was not working again:


But even after 21 Nov. 2015, only 1 of my 15 attempts to open my emails box, and access my

correspondence was successful.


Other attempts during the day were blocked by the messages

like this one [2 Dec. 2015] (see below):


I called Inter Net Canada innumerous times, but received no explanation, no apology, and no

solution.


Even worse: Inter Net Canada"s technicians have skeptically reacted to my reports, as if I invented the message "We cannot verify that this request was really sent by you", while my problems reports via an email or web-form were blocked.


I was receiving up to 60 - 200 spam messages daily, which actually sabotaged my correspondence, and the spam filters were blocked for me. (See an example below - 22 Nov. 2015).


Almost every email which I tried to send, was stopped under such a pretext (see below)


[2 Nov. 2015]


However, I compose my messages in advance, and ALWAYS paste them into the email window (form), which is never open more then 2-3 minutes, not 30!


My emails sending were also stopped when a window with the login-password suddenly appeared when I used to click the "send" button.


To resume (to finalize) the email sending I had to enter the login-password again (!), but after entering them, I used to receive a message loginpassword incorrect, or login failed! (See below). [30 Dec 2015.]


If sending an email or web browsing was not sabotaged by the error messages: then the upload speed used to fall down to "0" or around "0" (see below [30 Dec. 2015]:


If none of the above-mentioned sabotage tools were present, then an unusual, non-expected layout of the webmail page appeared, and no link (mail, inbox, etc.) was working.


(See below; 30 Dec. 2015):


My calls to Inter Net Canada did not go through, and I tried to submit an error report via webform or webmail, but all my attempts were blocked, or were accompanied by the next message (30-31 Dec. 2015):


This was destroying my evidence that I really sent a problem report to Inter Net Canada, and later (when I investigated this issue in January, 2016) I was told that they received nothing.


In the period of Dec. 2015 - Nov. 2016, I was receiving the most bizarre error messages from Inter Net Canada"s webmail page, like the following (see below; 30 Dec. 2015):


The recipient"s email address osharp@farford.edu was recognized by Inter Net Canada"s system as osharp@ca.inter.net, which is an absolute nonsense, and this blocked my email submission.


When, already in 2016, I described on the phone these error messages to Inter Net Canada"s technician, he said that this is "impossible", and disconnected.


3.6. The sabotage of the email service continued in 2016, since mid-January, 2016.


For example, instead of the usual (normal) interface, a webpage with a different design used to open (which existed in 2003 or 2005), provoking a suspicion that it could be a sublimated page, to which I was redirected by a malicious people (see below; 24-27 Jan. 2016):


Compare to the normal page with normal interface:


After my call to Inter Net Canada, the Internet-connection became very weak and slow, as if I was punished for reporting a problem.


However, I managed to send a problem report to Inter Net Canada (see below) [25 Mar. 2016]:


I received the next response from Inter Net Canada:


Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 09:44:11 -0400 [09:44:11 AM EDT]

From: Mindy Labrado via RT

To: leog@total.net

Reply-To: emailsupport@ca.inter.net

Subject: [ideal-access.com #95199] [Problem Report] Internet became very slow; connection with ca.iner.net is bad


Hi, Good day!


We truly apologize for the inconvenience.


I checked your connection and it's actually shows okay.


We encourage you to give us a call for us to further investigate the issue.


Thank you.

Sincerely,

Mindy

Customer

Service Rep help@ca.inter.net

www.ca.inter.net

18554401444


On Fri Mar 25 17:19:17 2016, leog@total.net wrote:


This problem report was received from 45.58.247.232.


The user clicked the problem report link from the following location:


https://webmail.ca.inter.net/horde3/imp/mailbox.php?mailbox=INBOX&mailbox_token=hOIqW

Cp400kA3zqmsCv4_OGfa-I


and is using the following browser:


Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:8.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/8.0.1


Our Internet is working vedry slow again, and the modem connection with the server is weak.


Please, RESTORE OUR SERVICE!

...............................


Thus, it is a pure humiliation, because "it's actually shows okay" expresses rather a satisfaction that the service is still interrupted than a confirmation or a denial that the Internet is not working for me.


I called Inter Net Canada, and no solution was found.


The Internet was slow as before, and was so slow that on 24-30 Mar. 2016, I had to sit for hours in front of the computer for sending a single email or reading a single web page.


However, as usually, a standard message ("the problem is resolved") arrived into my mailbox, in contradiction with the real state of things:


Inbox: [ideal-access.com #95199] Resolved: [Problem Report] Internet became very slow; connection with ca.iner.net is bad (1 of 20) PersonalUnseen


Mark as:

Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 12:24:27 -0400 [12:24:27 PM EDT]

From: Wesley Lozada via RT

To: leog@total.net

Reply-To: emailsupport@ca.inter.net

Subject: [ideal-access.com #95199] Resolved: [Problem Report] Internet became very slow; connection with ca.iner.net is bad


According to our records, your request has been resolved.


If you have any further questions or concerns, please respond to this message.


..................


3.7. Internet was not working 3 Jun. 2012 since 1 a.m.


I reported the problem by phone, and was told that the ticker is number 1967631.


The Internet-access was restored only around 15 Jun. 2016.


However, the email service was still blocked.


I could compensate this blockade by using my free web mailboxes more frequently, but not for official emails, because Quebec medical institutions, for example, did not want to deal with my "unknown" mail addresses.


By that time an urologist, Dr. Morris, politically-motivated and hostile towards me by then, has sabotaged the treatment and diagnostic procedures, refused the antibiotic therapy - when it was urgent, provoked 2 urological surgeries, and many complications. By an invasive procedure, he provoked a very serious infection, which almost killed me, refusing to respond to this life-threatening infection be medical treatment, and also created a hostility around me, so, that no urologist was [and IS, till today: Jan. 2023 (editorial remark)] brave enough to break the vicious circle of ostracism and to admit me as a patient.


Feeling a life-threatening situation if operated by a hostile doctor (who even did not want to say "Hello"), I canceled the surgery, and turned to another hospital.


However, I was denied a surgery (extremely urgent by then) - for months, and this caused innumerous complication for my health, and unspeakable suffering.


In such a dramatic situation, an uninterrupted mail service was crucial, but my leog@total.net mailbox was frozen: no incoming emails (even from people, with whom I had a telephone contact, and they told me that were sending emails, which did not arrive in my mailbox), no possibility to send emails.


18 Jun. 2016 I sent a complaint to Inter Net Canada (1-st from an alternative email host; then via the web-form):


To: emailsupport@ca.inter.net

To ca.total.net administration

From: L. Gunin (leog@total.net)

Since Thursday, June 16, 2016, my e-mail box is blocked.


I receive no new e-mails.


A crucial medical data that was sent to my e-mail leog@total.net is lost.


2 medical secretaries from 2 different offices have sent me e-mails, which did not arrive to my e-mail box.


The 2-nd time I was in front of my computer speaking with the medical secretary who sent an e-mail that was lost.


I also sent e-mails to myself (to leog@total.net) but these e-mails did not appear in my e-mail box as well.


The endless innumerous interruptions of my Internet-access, its normal functioning, interruptions or dysfunctions of the e-mail services, etc., and your suspiciously improper handling of all these problems are shocking.


June, 18, 2016.


................


The 3-rd medical email has arrives (after my complaint), but was delayed, because was sent by the medical secretary when I was speaking with her on the phone 2 days ago (see the screenshot below):


(For privacy and security reasons, I blackened the sender"s email address.)


Same day (18 Jun. 2016), I sent another problem report, which was responded on 21 Jun. 2016,

Tue. (see below):


Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 14:03:58 -0400 [02:03:58 PM EDT]

From: Wesley Lozada via RT

To: leog@total.net

Reply-To: emailsupport@ca.inter.net

Subject: [ideal-access.com #97490]

Re: my email box is blocked


Hi, Good day!


Please feel free to give us a call so we can assist you better.


We are open Mon-Fri 8AM-9PM and Sat 9AM-5PM.


Thank you.

Sincerely,

Wesley

Customer Service

Rep help@ca.inter.net

www.ca.inter.net

1-855-440-1444


===================


On Sat Jun 18 13:44:19 2016, leog@total.net wrote:


[Hide Quoted Text]


It looks like only emails that I

send from my leog@total.net

account, and emails from the

ca.inter.net's support center

are going through, and all

other emails that I send to

myself from other email boxes,

or emails sent to me by other

paople are blocked.


Quoting "Support Dept. via RT" :


Greetings,

This message has been automatically generated in response to:


"Re: my email box is blocked",

a summary of which appears below.


There is no need to reply to this message right now.


Your ticket has been assigned an ID of [ideal-access.com #97490].


Please include the string:

[ideal-access.com #97490]

in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.


To do so,


[Hide Quoted Text]


you may reply to this message.

Thank you,

Inter.net Canada


-------------------------------------------------------------------------


To ca.total.net administration

via emailsupport@ca.inter.net

From: L. Gunin (leog@total.net)

Since Thursday, June 16, 2016, my e-mail box is blocked.


I receive no new e-mails.


A crucial medical data that was sent to my e-mail leog@total.net is lost.


2 medical secretaries from 2 different offices have sent me e-mails, which did not arrive to my e-mail box.


The 2-nd time I was in front of my computer speaking with the medical secretary who sent an e-mail that was lost.


I also sent e-mails to myself (to leog@total.net) but these e-mails did not appear in my e-mail box as well.


The endless innumerous interruptions of my Internet-access, its normal functioning, interruptions or dysfunctions of the e-mail services, etc., and your suspiciously improper handling of all these problems are shocking.


June, 18, 2016.


................


Thus, I did several tests, sending emails from leog@total.net to leog@total.net, which appeared in the leog@total.net email box (as well as the messages from ca.inter.net"s support center), but none of the messages I sent from my free email accounts appeared in the mailbox (did not go through).


In the response from Inter Net Canada, it is recommended to contact them by phone, but the problem was that my calls to ca.inter.net call center were blocked.


However, in contradiction of the truth, a message that the problem "was resolved" arrived, when in reality is was not resolved again:


Inbox: [ideal-access.com #97490]

Resolved: Re: my email box is blocked (5 of 52) PersonalUnseen

Mark as:

Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 11:07:27 -0400 [23/06/16 11:07:27 AM EDT]

From: Wesley Lozada via RT

To: leog@total.net

Reply-To: emailsupport@ca.inter.net

Subject: [ideal-access.com #97490]

Resolved: Re: my email box is blocked


According to our records, your request has been resolved.


If you have any further questions or concerns, please respond to this message.


.................


Since 11 Sep. 2016 (the date of 9-11 terrorists acts (again!), Internet was running with frequent

interruptions, but on Sep. 25-30 such interruptions became more frequent and lasted longer, and

this was combined with emails filtering, when a number of emails, sent to me by various

persons, were lost, and never reached their destination (leog@total.net) which forced me to send

another problem report:


This problem report was definitely received at Inter Net Canada"s support center, because I

received an automatically-generated confirmation:


In violations of all norms, the response came only on 6 Oct. 2016, and de facto was not a

response, but just a formal reply (see below an extract from its text):


Inbox: [ideal-access.com #99992] INternet INterruption + E-mails filtering (4 of 11)

PersonalUnseen


Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2016 17:19:25 -0400 [06/10/16 05:19:25 PM EDT]

From: Wesley Lozada via RT

To: leog@total.net

Reply-To: emailsupport@ca.inter.net

Subject: [ideal-access.com #99992] INternet INterruption + E-mails filtering


Hi, Good day!


We do apologize for the inconvenience.


Your issue is already taken cared of.


To verify and if you still have concern/s, please give us a call so we can assist you better.


We are open Mon-Fri 8AM-9PM and Sat 9AM-5PM.


Thank you.

Sincerely,

Wesley

Customer Service

Rep help@ca.inter.net www.ca.inter.net

1-855-440-1444


+++++++++++++++


On Mon Sep 26 16:13:52 2016, leog@total.net wrote:


[Hide Quoted Text]


Dear Ca.Inter.net Customers? Support!


Yesterday, Sept. 25, 2016, and today, Sept. 26, 2016, I had my Internet-access interrupted several times again.


What actually happened is that the connection was suddenly lost, or with the still running connection there was no data flow from the Web, or, in other words, no downloading traffic, and the browsing was not possible.


....................


I replied to this message by calling Inter Net Canada (this time I, fortunately, could get through), and telling that till the end of September (2016) I was experiencing interruptions of Internet and filtering of my emails.


I also said that it is outrageous that - while my personal emails are filtered, - the spam can freely travel to my email box in astonishing numbers!


Concerning the beginning of October, I told, I cannot say definitely if the filtering continues as before, because I was receiving less personal emails, but emails, sent from my free web mail accounts to leog@total.net did not reach their destination.


I was promised a call back or an email message about this issue, and this was the end of conversation.


However, this time there was no written response or call from Inter Net Canada. They just ignored my complaint... And, outrageously, they sent me a message that this problem... was resolved! (See below).


Inbox: [ideal-access.com #99992] Resolved: INternet INterruption + E-mails filtering (1 of 11) PersonalUnseen


Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2016 11:07:15 -0400 [17/10/16 11:07:15 AM EDT]

From: Wesley Lozada via RT

To: leog@total.net

Reply-To: emailsupport@ca.inter.net

Subject: [ideal-access.com #99992]

Resolved: INternet INterruption + E-mails filtering


According to our records, your request has been resolved.


If you have any further questions or concerns, please respond to this message.


3.8. In October-December 2016 I had another very dramatic period of my life, and almost abandoned the email service at Inter Net Canada, and, if used to send an email, was using my free web email accounts.


3.9. However, the Internet-access interruptions persisted as before; I just had no mental and physical force to initiate other problem report procedures, mostly useless anyway.


To Whom It May Concern


From Lev Gunin


DECLARATION 2019-2021


PART 4


4.1. Annoying disconnections, disruptions, Internet and email service malfunctioning, provocations, mass and systematic virus and spam attacks, etc., have forced me to terminate the ca.inter.net services. I started to speak with Inter Net Canada"s operators about disconnecting ca.inter.net in November, 2016. However, my personal situation became in November - March 2016 so dramatic that I could not accomplish this intention till May, 2017.


However, since February, 2017, some kind of persuasive spam, fishing, and security breaches began to attack me from one of Montreal Internet providers, from extortion of personal information, to suddenly pop out windows when I was browsing the Internet. For example, such a window could appear at any non-expected moment, displaying a survey announce, with the text like "Dear (...) user! Your connection has been selected to get an exclusive reward", etc.


No one besides the Inter Net Canada"s staff was aware of my intention to disconnect their services, so, I came to a conclusion that such a massive attack of spam and fishing messages from one particular Montreal company was someone"s in Inter Net Canada provocation, which goal was to scare me and drive me away from this particular Internet provider. However, if, I concluded, they don"t want me to become this company"s customer, I"ll switch to it, and did it.


[Samples of pre-disconnection of ca.inter.net services provocations can be provided on request.]


However, I did not take the email service from the new provider by different reasons, and kept the Inter Net Canada"s email.


I received a modem and a router from this ISP, and hoped that all my problems are behind me. However, when I switched to the new Internet-provider, the Internet did not work. I am sure that it happened because of Bell"s sabotage, but I am not sure that I have enough evidence to prove it. I can only present recordings of 3 conversations with Bell"s technicians at my home, and 1 when I called Bell. They have to be evaluated by experts before any unambiguous conclusion. But the facts are pointing to Bell as the cause of the sabotage.


4.2. The new Internet-provider invited Bell"s technicians to solve the problem at my home 3 times. 3 Bell"s technicians, replacing 2 old telephone sockets, have installed 2 new wall sockets: 1 near the entrance to the apartment (where there was a special socket, which by default had an interrupter / disconnecter that could completely cut the telephone line signal to the whole apartment, and, besides, had a "central" phone socket, which could be used for connecting a phone apparel), and 2-nd in the wall between the salon and 1-st bedroom.


They also installed 2 splitters, connected to these 2 new telephone wall sockets.


[13 Mar. 2017; 17 Mar. 2017; and 20 Mar. 2017].


They ignored my demands to explain why all these devices are needed, what role they play, and why so many changes were necessary.


The original special wall socket near the entrance was ruined, and an option to disconnect the signal was destroyed.


When, after all these operations, Internet still did not work, the 3-rd technician came again (strangely, on Saturday, 13 May 2017), did a number of new manipulations, and wanted to install another, 3-rd, splitter.


This time, I did not allow him to do so, and, facing my firm disagreement, he promised to restore the entrance socket, but, instead, made a whole in the wall, and installed a splitter inside the wall.


All these strange and fishy operations, technicians" behavior, usage of their cellular phones as a

sort of the testing devices, and utilization of another devise with buttons, which looked like a

bigger cellular phone, as a testing tool, and a number of other details caused a suspicion not only

in me alone, but in my wife as well.


Now, the Internet was running, but with problems, disruptions, disconnections, and so on.


The telephone also malfunctioned, and was very often disconnected for hours or even days.


After a number of my complaints, the new Internet-phone-provider has transferred me to another

(not Bell"s) technology, sending me another modem and router, which were connected by non-

Bell"s technician.


Since then Internet and phone worked without any problems during more then 3 years. To be

more precise: in first 3 months rare interruptions occurred, and I had to disconnect and restart

sometimes the modem-router, so, the new Internet-provider replaced the modem and the router.


After this replacement disconnections or disruptions never happened: not even a single time. No

problems - no complaints / problems reports. 3 years the Internet was working without a single

disconnection, serious speed slowing, or other problems, which is a proof that all previous

problems were generated by Inter Net Canada.


4.3. Meanwhile, the email service, which was still with Inter Net Canada, was continuously sabotaged. From 3 Nov. 2017 (my birthday!) to 5 Nov. 2017 it was completely sabotaged.


Since 24 Nov. 2017 it was completely sabotaged again (right after an email from a famous political journalist based in Sweeden). Actually, the server was blocking any operation of my personal emails sending (see 2 screenshots [25 Nov. 2017] below) [the text of this and next message in Russian has a private character, and, by the content, it is clear that these emails" recipients were my close friends]:


[for confidentiality reasons the address is masked, but this was a reply to an email from my permanent correspondent and my close friend, a famous Russian poet; the original of this screenshot can be provided on request to a human rights organization, a lawyer, or a forensic expert]


[for confidentiality reasons the address is masked, but this was a reply to an email from my permanent correspondent and my close friend, another famous poet; the original of this screenshot can be provided on request to a human rights organization, a lawyer, or a forensic expert]


Not only the email service was disabled, but my access to ca.inter.net"s web site was also

suspended, as if I was banned from accessing it (see below):


My telephone calls to Inter Net Canada from my own phone number were blocked, but I

managed to contact ca.inter.net via a different phone. I described the problem, quoted the errors"

messages, but was told that I must call from my home for "doing some tests". I replied that my

phone access to ca.inter.net"s call center is blocked, and asked another question: "Isn"t it possible

to restore my access to the webmail service navigating by only the error code?!". Strangely, the

operator held me on the line unnecessary additional time, speaking as if our previous

conversation never existed.


Next day (26 November 2017) the blockage of my personal emails, and of my access to

ca.inter.net"s web site was still blocked (see next screenshot below):


I don"t remember how many days lasted this particular disconnection of the webmail services, and did not find records in my database, but since 27 November 2017 the blockage of my problem reports was lifted, and I managed to sent the next problem report to ca.inter.net"s technical support:


To: Ca. Inter. Net,


From: leog@total.net

Tel. / Fax 514-xxxxxxxx


Hi!


1. Since 24 November, 2017, my emails are blocked by the ca.inter.net server. Additionally, this

blockage has a strange feature.


When I press the button - répondre - to respond to a spam email, such an email is not blocked. But when I'm trying to send a respond to a message of my regular correspondent, such a message is blocked (see the screenshots). Another bizarre thing is that while pressing a button - répondre - and mailing a message body with just a quotation, without my own text, I have no problems to send it. However, as soon as I add a text of my response, the email is blocked.


2. Attachments are allowed, as soon as they are pictures, not text files. Does it mean that I have no permission to sent emails because if the content of my messages?


3. Problems with my correspondence arose right after a message from a prominent person and my response to his email (22 Nov 2017). 23 Nov 2017 I noticed some abnormal delays and failures, and 24-26 Nov 2017 my ability to send emails with my text was completely blocked. I tried 4 different browsers, with the same result.


4. All my attempts to send a message to your customers" support from my mailbox or from the web browser are also blocked (see the picture).


5. I demand an immediate and unconditional restoration of the email service, and an access to complete information about what happened and why.


Yours truly,

leog@total.net

27 November 2017.

.............


Before I could make a screenshot, the computer screen has started to blink, and then the system

restarted. I immediately called ca.inter.net"s call center, and reported all problems, but received

no reply to this particular error report. No apology, no compensation, not even a response this

time.


4.4. I believe that the sabotage of their own services by Inter Net Canada was and continue to be caused not only by the politically-motivated (or ideologically-motivated) persecutions, but also by Inter Net Canada"s policy of favoritism, which is privileging the business users, disregarding and abusing the residential customers, especially from the underprivileged groups. I also believe that Inter Net Canada is practicing discrimination based on customers" ethnic origins, discriminating immigrants, especially those who came not from the Western-European countries, or not from United States.


In support of my impression, I can provide (on request) a number of ca.inter.net"s advertisements from 2006-2014, which, in my opinion, stress such a favoritism, and also web-based discussions about Inter Net Canada"s treatment of ordinary people.


In 2018 all above mentioned problems persisted, but I was so tired to react to them, and my

reports seemed so useless that I stopped to send the problems reports.


However, I reported the new problems, which did not happen before on such a big scale. It was the massive arrival of spam to my webmail, which followed the instances when I was reading my emails in one browser, and the online press in the other browser. This was just another evidence that my webmail was somehow compromised by Inter Net Canada, because in my free webmail accounts I almost never saw any spam message.


Here (see below the screenshots) are few examples:


There are 30-40 spam messages per every 1 personal email, and this situation was persisting till

mid-2020, when ALL my personal emails began to be blocked. Since then I don"t receive any

personal email, just spam alone. The outgoing emails are blocked as well, so that none of my

email recipients is getting my messages from leog@total.net.


4.5. At the same time, in June-August 2018, the every time I opened my webmail (every time I

used the Inter Net Canada"s webmail service) - it was accompanied by a massive viruses /

Trojans attack (see the example the screenshot below [9 Jun. 2018]):


Since August 2018 the spam volume became so enormous that actually disabled the email

service (see the examples screenshots below [30-31 Aug. 2018]):


(there are no personal emails at all, just spam)


(there is only 1 personal email, the rest is spam)


Interestingly, some of the names indicated in the spam messages are the same as emails names of some of my correspondents-recipients (my close friends), which is an indication that my whole correspondence was compromised by Inter Net Canada. No such a "coincident" ever occurred in my free webmail accounts.


And, while I am receiving a record number of spam, the spam filters are disabled (till today,

January 2021) by Inter Net Canada (see the screenshot below [9 Sep. 2018]):


Meanwhile, the record number of the spam messaged during the period of 9-11 Sep. 2018 just

increased, and on 11 Sep. 2018 I received several provocative and threatening emails. From 12

to 24 Sep. 2018 the volume of the spam suddenly decreased, but still remained non-acceptable

(see the screenshot below [20 Sep. 2018]):


In December 2018 the spam volume has increased again, up to 100-200 spam messages daily,

with no personal email in my email box for days or even weeks, while my emails sent from my

free webmail accounts normally had a reply.


From 4 to 9 Dec. 2018 all incoming emails were lost, and the emails, which already arrived and

were in my webmail Inbox folder, disappeared, and the webmail Inter Net Canada"s service was

in general blocked for me.


When, on 10 Dec. 2018, I, finally, could access my webmail box, I found the next message from

ca.inter.net"s administration (see below):


Inbox: Inter.net Canada Email and Website Maintenance Notice Dec 5 2018 (5 of 130)

PersonalUnseen


Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2018 10:05:41 -0500 [04/12/18 10:05:41 AM EST]

From: no-reply@ca.inter.net

To: Leo Gunin

Subject: Inter.net Canada Email and Website Maintenance Notice Dec 5 2018


Hello,


Please note that Inter.net Canada will be performing scheduled maintenance on December 5th from 12am - 4am in our data center.


During this time, Incoming email and any emails you send will be queued and released after the maintenance is completed.


While we perform maintenance, our website, customer portal and webmail client will also be offline. This is not expected to disrupt any of your other voice or data services. We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause.

Your patience is appreciated,

Inter.net Canada

1-855-440-1444

...............


I don"t know if there was indeed a maintenance operation at Inter Net Canada, or they just submitted a disinformation, and if they sent the same message to all their customers, or just to me: as a cover up operation.


4.6. In 2019, the invoice report (its HTML part) has been modified by Inter Net Canada so that the personal confidential information was now displayed not only in the pdf-format attachment, but in the emails html body as well.


Knowing that the confidentiality of my account and my web mails were already compromised by Inter Net Canada, I asked many times not to include my personal information into the html email"s body, but my demands were always ignored.


I also asked Inter Net Canada if such a form of the invoices are sent only to me alone, or they been modified for all ca.inter.net"s users, but this question was never answered as well. The samples of non-secure invoices and my correspondence with Inter Net Canada can be provided on request.


In May 2019 every 2-nd attachment to an email was removed by the server. No reaction from Inter Net Canada after my complaints.


Since August, 2019, the volume of spam became just incomprehensible. Thousands of spam messages blocked my access to my personal emails. Since August, 2019, I started to demand restoring the functionality of the spam filters for me, but all my demands were ignored, and the spam filters were never repaired for my web-email box.


In spite of lack of time and new difficulties in my life, I found time, and sent another complaint to Inter Net Canada in the end of December 2019:


Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2019 11:29:13 -0500 [11:29:13 AM EST]

From: leog@total.net

To: Lisbeth Polanco via RT

Cc: Pierre Arseneault via RT

Subject: Re: Problems not solved.

To Ca.Inter.Net Billing

Pierre Arseneault via RT

and Technical Support Departments


Lisbeth Polanco via RT billing@ca.inter.net


Dear Sir or Lady!

For many years I am experiencing serious problems with your e-mail service.


From time to time they become literary unbearable.


The latest series of the sabotage started in 2016-2018, when hundreds of the spam messages actually blocked my normal access to my electronic correspondence, and the Internet-access became so interruptive and unreliable that I had to switch from your company to another Web-Provider, and since then (already for years) I am enjoying a normal Internet service - without the blockage of university web sites, and other Web resources, without daily interruptions of Internet-access or full Internet disconnection for several days (for which your company never paid me any compensation, and gave no bonuses), etc.


However, for some reasons, which I am not going to discuss, I was forced to continue using my e-mail box with ca.inter.net, and to pay for your e-mail service. And the sabotage of the normal services, provocations, and inconveniences continue.


The breach of information that I enter in my e-mail messages is one of them. The content of my e-mails becomes known to the spammers, who are bombarding me with the spam content, which corresponds to the content of my e-mails.


And your methods are endangering the information security even further.


Some times ago you started to send me the invoices with my open personal data (my full name, my telephone number, and my postal address) in the e-mail body (in the html â?" text format), instead of just pdf-only attachment, as before.


I have protested about such a blatant practice many times in my written complaints and in my calls to ca.inter.net, but this practice in continuing, in spite of all my protests.


I even received a message from your billing department, which was in agreement with my concerns


(Inbox: [INTER.NET #950882]


Billing - Leo Gunin - 100100006883-invoice format

Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2019 14:10:37 -0500 [26/11/19 02:10:37 PM EST]

From: Pierre Arseneault via RT

To: leog@total.net

Reply-To: billing@ca.inter.net

Subject: [INTER.NET #950882]

Billing - Leo Gunin - 100100006883-invice format


Hi!

I prefer also my invoices in PDF format.

I've escalated your concerns.

Pierre Arseneault

Customer Experience Coordinator ).


However, I just received another (recent) invoice with the same open data again!

(December, 2019).


400 spam messages per day or per few days are actually making my normal access to my e-mails impossible, but the spam filtering is not working for me for years, and this is not due to web browser, or to other reasons on my side, but completely caused by some problems or sabotage on your end.


I complained about this many times in writing and through my calls to ca.inter.net.


Last time I called ca.inter.net about the spam filtersâ?T malfunction on November 11, 2019.


I spoke to a very helpful, responsible, and professional person, who confirmed that the spam filter did not work from my e-mail-box indeed, but, he explained, I can use the general user account access from ca.inter.net's web site, which is working OK.


I knew this, and used this feature successfully in the past, but since 2018 it stopped working for me. Still, 2 days later I tested this option, and have managed to enter several spam senders' e-mail addresses successfully into this page.


Yet, to my surprise, the same spam was coming to my e-mail-box again, so, I went back to the spam filtering page at the general account settings, and discovered that all spam data that I have entered is not there any more. It disappeared. When I tried to enter it again, this feature was not working any more.


Please, at least restore my access to the spam filtering feature and stop sending me unsecured invoices.

Yours truly,

Lev (Leon) Gunin.

.......................


Here (below) are the spam filters (January, 2020), which I set ALL to "deny", but a number of "denies" have been automatically changed to "allow", except of the old ones, which I entered before 2017.


Besides, almost every entered blockage don"t work, because I continuing to receive the spam emails from the same addresses.


4.7. The summary of my demands to Inter Net Canada is displayed in my finalized message to

Inter Net Canada"s administration, technical support, and billing departments (2 Oct. 2020) [for

security reasons, the confidential information is masked in this version]:


To Ca.Inter.Net Billing

and Technical Support Departments.

To Ca.Inter.Net Administrators and Directors. [customercomplaints@ca.inter.net ]

From: Gunin, Lev [514-xxxxxxx; leog@total.net]


Dear Sir or Lady!


1. On 22 September 2020, I have submitted a complaint and reported problems to

Ca.Inter.Net"s Technical Support, Billing, and Administration departments [see its copy below],

but never received any response.


It is indicated on your web-site (ca.inter.net) that the company"s rule is to respond within 48

hours to a reported problem. However, 11 days passed, and no one called me from ca.inter.net,

or sent an email.


Additionally, I must stress that my complaints via your web-form to ca.inter.net from my

email account, and from my general user account were blocked [see the images below].

Similarly, my problems reports via email were blocked as well [see the images below]. I had to

sent the problem report using a different Internet-access, and only then my message went

through. I tried to contact ca.inter.net by phone, but my calls were also blocked. This indicated

that my customer"s rights are violated, and my access to ca.inter.net"s technical support and to

complains procedure are blocked altogether.


[see below]


When I, finally, found a way around to submit my complain, a window came out with the

message: Thank you for your request. You will be contacted within 48 hours by one of our

customer service representatives to assist with your request:


[see below]


However, as I wrote above, no representative has ever contacted me.


2. In my previous complaint sent 22 September 2020 I informed you about the disappearance

of ALL my emails from my email box (from the Inbox folder) [26 messaged] and about the

frequent routine disappearances of my personal emails, both outgoing and incoming. Now I am

facing the blockage of ALL personal emails, outgoing or incoming, which started Saturday, 19

September, 2020.


The image below displays my Inbox content on 1 October 2020: among 18 messages 17 are

spam messages, and 1 is the 83-th submission of a pdf magazine, which I accept but not

requested. So, there are NO personal emails among them, no responses to my emails, which I

sent to my personal correspondents, while they very soon respond to my free email accounts,

which mean that my access to my personal correspondence is blocked by ca.inter.net"s

administration. (See below).


3. The spam filters are also blocked for me: as before; both from the Web Mail, as well as

from the home page of Inter.net Canada"s web-site through my general user"s account:


4. On May 1 and May 9, 2020 (Victory Day in Russia) all Russian, Polish, Ukrainian,

German, or French messages in my webmail Inbox were unreadable becoming an abracadabra,

which represents a vicious sabotage and discriminatory mockery, considering the dates of the 1

May Workers Solidarity and the Victory Day in Russia:


When I clicked on one of the FROM-SUBJECT link [Inter.net Canada Invoice], it opened a

window with the next message:


---- and was redirected to the next page:


[see the next page]


My reaction was too quick, and I automatically clicked on LOGIN (the user name and

password fields were pre-filled already without my typing) without noticing that this was a

sublimated page, not Inter.net Canada. A dangerous computer virus was sent to my computer

system, and my password was compromised.

And this is just one small example of hundreds of similar provocations...


To Whom It May Concern

From Lev Gunin

DECLARATION 2019-2021


PART 5


5. In a number of occasions it takes up to 10 minutes to send an email from Inter.net Canada,

or, sometimes, it is not possible to send an email at all:


Another problem is a frequent failure of my messages to copy themselves to the Sent folder.

"Accidently", exactly such messages have normally never reach their destination:


[see the next page]


6. When I access Inter.net Canada"s Web Mail page, I am getting such a message:


There are approximately 12 types of Firefox, Internet Explorer, and other browsers"

messages about the risk and insecurity of connecting to my Inter.net Canada"s mail or general

user"s accounts. Don"t tell me that it is normal.


7. These are just few of numerous examples of discrimination, abuse, mockery, and

provocations. While the most of the ordinary Inter.net Canada"s employers (like technical

support workers) were helpful and responsible [I could reach them when my phone was still not

disconnected from Inter.net Canada"s technical support], it is likely that the company"s

administration is the source of all my troubles.


There is a copy of my previous complain below, followed by a list of my main demands:


_______________


Dear Sir or Lady!


During last 10 years (and before) I am facing violation of my civil and customer"s rights,

intrusion into my privacy, sabotage of outgoing and incoming emails, censorship filtering and

police ca.inter.net"s functions, freedom of speech"s violation, spam setting sabotage, and many

other illegal and lawless actions from ca.inter.net.


When my full internet-access was provided by ca.inter.net, I had innumerous phone and

Internet disconnections every week, and sometimes for many days. Since switching to another

Internet-access server, I had no troubles with my Internet-access for a number of years now.

A huge archive with my complaints about my Internet disconnections to ca.inter.net vs. 0

("zero") since I left ca.inter.net: is the proof of deliberate sabotage.


Unfortunately, by some reasons I am compelled to continue using ca.inter.net"s mail server,

having innumerous problems, which I don"t have with my other email boxes.


Here (below) I am listing the most outraged violations:


1. POLITICALLY-MOTIVATED CENSORSHIP AND PERLUSTRATION:


In many cases a text in my outgoing emails, which can be interpreted as "political" or

"ideological" - is blocked by ca.inter.net.


Requests to describe a political situation in my native country, my opinion about some aspects of the medical care in Canada, my complains about scrambling my voter"s rights during the last Quebec elections, and so on: are blocked by ca.inter.net. If my email is written not in English, it arrives to my correspondents in a destroyed coding with question marks only.


If I persistently sending the same text with my own defined coding, or as a pdf or another attachment: this mail is just never reaches its destination.


Simultaneously, a copy to my "sent" box appears destroyed, displaying not my email"s test, but the logging form:


Welcome to Inter.net Canada's Webmail

Username

Password

Language


[Here (below) is one of the samples of the "gibberish text" in my submitted emails, which encoding options were set to "Unicode" (as always [so, why my emails sent to newspapers, publishers, or journalists had to be "exempted" from displaying the correct letter characters in Russian, German, French, or Polish languages, while all other emails with Unicode settings arrive to recipients with a normal readable text?]):


Sent: Re: ??????????? ?????????? ?????????? ????? ????? (1 of 2)

Mark as:

Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2020 16:31:10 -0400 [04:31:10 PM EDT]

From: leog@total.net

To: Altaspera Publishing

Cc: Boris Kriger

Subject: Re: ??????????? ?????????? ?????????? ????? ?????


1 unnamed 24 KB


Пытался отправить Вам письмо

14 раз, и всё время диверсии

портят кодировку, делая мои

письма нечитаемыми.


Вот ещё одна попытка достучаться...


Смотрите 3 вложенных файла


(разархивируйте и читайте)


Quoting Altaspera Publishing :


[Hide Quoted Text]


Здравствуйте, Лев!


Прошу Вас ответьте нам, т.к. мы получили от Вас письмо нечитаемое.


Отправьте пожалуйста повторно.


Будем ждать Вашего ответа.


Благодарим за сотрудничество.


С уважением,

исполнительный директор издательства "Altaspera Publishing & Literary Agency

Inc."

Арзанов Артур Альбертович


чт, 4 июн. 2020 г. в 03:39, :


9 ????? 2020 ???? ???? ?????? ?? ????. ? ????? ??????? ???, ?,

???? ????????? ????, ????? ????? ??? ???????? ????????.

? ?? ?????? ???? ???????????? ?? ???? ????, ?? ??????? ????????

?????? ? ????? ?????????? ??? - ? ???????? ?? ????? ??????? ?

?????? ???? ??????.

[????? 100 ??? ??????????? ??????????? ????????; ? ??????????

???????????? ????????, ????????? "??????????? ?????????", ???

???????????? "?????????? ???????" ????????? ????????. ?????? ??

????????? ? ?? ?????; ??????? ??????? ? ??????? ? ????????????

?????????????; ????????? ???????? ????????? ???????????? ??????? /11

???????? 2001 ?.; ????? ?????? ? ?????; / ???????? ???????; 9 ????????

2020 ?. ???????????? ???????? ???????? ?????? ?? ?????????? ????? ?? 2

???. / : ??? ??????? "?????? ? ??????" ?? ????????? ??????.]

???? ???????????? ???? ????? ?????? ?? ???????? ??????-??????,

??? ?????? ???????, ?????? ??? - ?? ????? ???? - ??? ?????? ?????????.

(?????? - ? ??????? ?? ???????)

??? ?????

????? ????? ???????

??? ?????????? ?????:

?) ????? ??????????: ???????? (??????);

?) ???????????????? ????????; ??????????;

???????; ??????? ? ????; ??????? ??????????

? ??????-??????????, ???????? ? ??????? ??

???????, ????????, ??????????, ???????????,

????????, ? ??. ??????; ????? ??? ????????? ????;

???????????? ????? ??????????? ?????:

?) ??????????? ?????: leog@total.net

?) ???????? ????? (??? ????????? ??????????

??????????) - ?????, ???? ?????? ?????

??????????.

?) ??? ???? ?????????? ????:

"? ????????????? ?????? ? ??????" ?

????? ????? ???????

???????????? ???????? ? ???????, ???????? ??????, ?????????

???????????? "?????????? ?????" ???????? ? ??????????, ????? ????, ???

?? ????? ??????, ?? ????????????? ???????? "??????" ????? ?????

????????????? ? ??????? ???????.

????? ??????????? ???? ???, ??? ????????? ?????, ? ????

????????? ????????????, ?????????? ??????????? ???????? ???????

???????? ?? ????? ???????? ????.

??? ??, ??? ??? ???????? ????????, ????????????? ?

?????????????? ?????? ???????????? ???????? ?? ??????? ???????

?????????? ? ??????? ????? ????? ????????????. ??????? ?????? ???????

??????? ?? ??? ???? ?? ?????????? ??????.

???? ?? ?????, ?????????? ? ????????????, ??????? ????? ?????

???????, ?????? ????????????? ???????, ???????? ? ??????? (? ????????

???????? ??? 3 ??????? ?????????).

??? ?? ??? ?? "???????? ?????", ???????? ? ??????? ?? ??????

???? 3 ??????????? ? ???? (????????, ?????? ? ?????), ? ??? ?????????

??????? ?? ????????????? ??????? ?????????

??? "???????? ?????": ??????? ????????? ????????? (???).

?????? ? ????, ??? ????????????? ??????????? ????? ??????? ??

????????, ? ???????????? ?????. ??? ????????? ?? ????????????????

???????? ?????????? ???????-??????????, ?????, ??? ????????, ?????,

??????, ?????????, ?????, ??????????? ????????? (?????????), ??????

(???????), ????? (??????), ?????, ?????, ???????, ?????, ? ??.

??? ??????-????????? ?????????? ?????? ???????? ??????

?????????????? ??????????? ??????? ?? ??????????? ??????? ?????

????????. ?? ?????? ??? ?? "??????" ??? ??? ????? ?????????? ????,

??????? ??????????? ? ?????????????, ?????? (??????????)

????????-???????, ????? ??????????? ??????? ?????? ???????,

??????????????? ???????????? ??????????.

????????, ?????? ?? ???????? ?????? ? "??????????????"

?????-???????? ??????????? ???????????????? (?????????? ? ???????)

??????? (?????, ??? ??????). (??. ?????? ????? ????????, ??????????

?????????? ??????? ??????????).

?????-???????? ???????? ????????, ?????? ?? XII-XIII ?. ?.?.,

???????? ??????????, "?????????? ?????" ????? ????, ????? ? ?????, ?

?? ????? ?? ??????????? ?????????. ?? ????? "????" ???????? ????

?????????, ???????, ??????? ? ???????. ??????? ?????-?????? ???????? ?

?????????? ???????; ????? ???? ?????????? ????-??????? ?????????,

??????? ?????????????? ???. ?? ??? ???? ??????? ????? ????????? ?

?????????? ? ?????????? ??????? ????? ?????????????? ????-??????? ?

???????? ?????????????.

??????? ??????????? ????? ??????? ? ?????? ?????, ???????

????? ???????? ? ????. ???????, ??? ??? ?????? ?? ???? ?????????.

????????, ?????? ? ?????????? ??????????? ??????? ????? ?????????

????????. ???? ???????? ???? ???????? ????????? ????????? ???????. ?

???????????? ??????????-?????????????? ??????????? ???? ??? ??????

????????? ????????. ???????? ??, ?? ?????? "??????????????" ????

???????? ?????? ???? ????????: ??????? ?????? ????????

"??????????????" ????? ??????????? ????????? ??????????????

??????????? ?? ???????. ? ??? ?? ????? ?? ???????????? ?????????????

"??????" ?? ???????? ???????? ? ???, ? ?????? (????? "???????????").

????? ??? ????????? ?????????? ?????????? ??????, ? ?????????? ?

?????????? ????? ?????????? ???????? "?????????? ???????????".

???????? ????, ?????? ? ??????? ?????, ??????????? ? ????????,

??????? ????? ??????? ??????? ???????????? ???????. ??? ????????????

??????? ???????????: ???? ?? ???????? "???????????????", ???????????

???? ??????????????????? ?????????. ?? ?? ??????? ??????????? ??? ?

???? ??? (??. ? ???? ??? ?????? "????????? ???????", "????????????",

"???????" ? "??????? ??-????????"). ?????????? ?????? ???????? ??????

??????????? ? ?????? ?????????? ?????? ???????? ? ????????? ????????.


[I skip a big part of the text for an obvious reason]


?????????? ????????????

"Altaspera Publishing & Literary Agency Inc."

4544 Dufferin Street #209

Toronto, ON M3H 5X2

Canada

Phone. 1 705 571 4325

E-mail: altaspera@gmail.com | info@altaspera.ru

2 unnamed 0 KB


[Attachment stripped: Original attachment type: "application/zip", name: "000000786755465435432.zip"]


2. BLOCKAGE OF MY ACCESS TO MY EMAILS

AND DISAPPEARANCE OF INBOX MESSAGES.


Sometimes I can not access my emails, because the login screen brings a message that my

password or username is incorrect, when in reality I am typing or copying them absolutely

correctly. It can last 1-2 hours or half a day, and, when I finally able to access my email-box: an

important email is usually appears to be vanished. It looks like my access to my emails is

blocked to destroy some important messages BEFORE I can read them.


Sometimes, when I access my emails, in this very moment the whole content of the "inbox"

disappears. So happened on 21 September 2020, when all received emails have instantly

vanished altogether. The Inbox became empty without my single click or touching of the

keyboard, or the mouse movement.


In some cases the content of the Inbox comes back when I access it next time, but I am not

sure that ALL of the emails were restored; in some cases the Inbox remains empty.


3. BLOCKAGE OF THE EMAIL SENDING FUNCTION.


As an example, I can describe what happened on 24 November, 2017, and continued few days

in a row.


a. Since 24 November, 2017, my emails were blocked by the ca.inter.net server. This

blockage has a strange feature. When I pressed the button - repondre - to respond to a spam

email, such an email was not blocked. But when I was trying to send a respond to a message of

my regular correspondent, such a message was blocked. Another bizarre thing is that while

pressing a button - repondre - and mailing a message body with just a quotation (without my own

text) I have no problems to send it. However, as soon as I typed even a single word - the email

was blocked.


b. Attachments were allowed, as soon as they are pictures, not text files.


c. Problems with my correspondence arose right after a message from a prominent person

and my response to his email (22 Nov 2017). 23 Nov 2017 I noticed some abnormal delays and

failures, and 24-26 Nov 2017 my ability to send emails with my text was completely blocked. I

tried 4 different browsers, and 2 different computers - with the same result.


4. BLOCKAGE OF THE SPAM FILTERING FUNCTION.


Since I switched to another Internet-access server, and am using only ca.inter.net"s mail

service, my access to spam filtering feature is blocked. However, it was already blocked even

before.


In 2016-2018 hundreds of spam messages actually blocked my normal access to my

electronic correspondence, and the Internet-access became so interruptive and unreliable that I

had to switch from your company to another Web-Provider, and since then (already for years) I

am enjoying a normal Internet service - without any daily interruptions, blockage of university

web sites (and other Web resources, or full Internet disconnection for several days (for which

your company never paid me any compensation, and gave no bonuses), etc.


Though, I must remind that - despite the reduction in my payment for your services - my

access to your email service is not free, but payable; however, your service is much worse (even

incomparable) then the most unreliable free email servers".


And the sabotage of the normal services, provocations, and inconveniences continue.

The breach of information that I enter in my e-mail messages is one of them.


The content of my e-mails becomes known to spammers, who are bombarding me with

the spam content, which corresponds to the content of my e-mails. And your methods are

endangering the information security even further. Some times ago you started to send me the

invoices with my open personal data (my full name, my telephone number, and my postal

address) in the e-mail body (in the html - text format), instead of just pdf-only attachment (as

before).


I have protested about such a blatant practice many times in my written complaints and

in my calls to ca.inter.net, but this practice in continuing, in spite of all my disagreements.


I even received a message from your billing department, which was in agreement with my concerns


(Inbox: [INTER.NET #950882] Billing - Leo Gunin - 100100006883-invice format

Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2019 14:10:37 -0500 [26/11/19 02:10:37 PM EST]

From: Pierre Arseneault via RT

To: leog@total.net

Reply-To: billing@ca.inter.net

Subject: [INTER.NET #950882] Billing - Leo Gunin - 100100006883-invice format


Hi!


I prefer also my invoices in PDF format.


I've escalated your concerns.


Pierre Arseneault

Customer Experience Coordinator ).

...................


However, next time I received another invoice with the same open data again! (December, 2019), and the same practice continue till now.


Up to 400 spam messages per day or per few days (or 2-3 weeks): are actually making my normal access to my e-mails impossible, but the spam filtering is not working for years, and this is not due to my web browser, or to another reason on my side. It is completely caused by some

problems or sabotage on your end.


I complained about this many times in writing and through my calls to ca.inter.net.


Last time I called ca.inter.net about the spam filters" malfunction on November 11, 2019.


I spoke to a very helpful, responsible, and professional person, who confirmed that the spam filter did not work from my e-mail-box indeed [I can provide the wav file of this conversation recording], but, he explained, I can use the general user account access from ca.inter.net"s web site, which is working OK. I knew this, and used this feature successfully in the past, but since 2018 it stopped working for me.


Still, 2 days later I tested this option, and have managed to enter several new spam senders" email addresses successfully into this page.


Yet, to my surprise, the same spam was continuing to arrive to my e-mail-box again. So, I went back to the spam filtering page at the general account settings, and discovered that all spam data that I have entered is not there any more.


It disappeared. When I tried to enter it again, this feature was not working any more.


2 weeks later I accesses the general user account (from ca.inter.net"s web site), and was able

to enter new spam emails successfully again.


This time my new enters did not disappear, but, to my astonishment, the same spam was continuing to arrive from the same email addresses. It indicates that the spam filtering is not working for me anyway.


5. DISAPPEARENCE OF IMPORTANT MEDICAL EMAILS.


From 2017 to 2020, 4 emails or their attachment, sent to me from the offices of the medical

parishioners, have vanished, which could (and, in 1 occasion did) do a serious damage to me.


6. UNREADABLE EMAILS DECODING

TECHNIQUE THAT PUT ME IN DANGER.


Here is an example of such a technique:


Date: Mon, 04 May 2020 15:40:55 -0700 [04/05/20 06:40:55 PM EDT]

From: test@gppl.pl Poland

To: Recipients

Reply-To: amh_finance@outlook.com

Subject: [No Subject]


This message was written in a character set (utf-8) other than your own.

If it is not displayed correctly, click here to open it in a new window.


A2C0CC CDD3C6C5CD CAD0C5C4C8D2 C4CBDF D4C8CDC0C


When I clicked on "click here" link: I was redirected to an unknown web-site, and received computer viruses. The web-site also tried to hack into my computer.


7. FREQUENT DECODING MALFUNCTIONING,

AND THE ORDER OF PAGES" DISPLAY DE-CONFIGURATION.


From time to time, when I open my email box, all emails in foreign (not English) languages

(Polish, German, Russian, Chinese, Ukrainian, French, Belorussian, etc.) are displayed on the list

and inside as an abracadabra. In the same time, an opening page is not the page of the last emails

(as I configured many years ago, and never changed it), but the last, or one of the several pages

between first and the last, which takes my time and annoying...


8. DEADLY CONSEQUENCES OF SPAM

FILTERING BLOCKAGE AND OF

OPEN INFORMATION IN THE INVOICES EMAILS.


I am receiving a number a spam messages, which threaten to "denounce" my alleged

"financial violations" ("refusal" to pay for my company); abuse of people 40 years older then me;

my feminist activity; alleged driving with a falsified driving license, or a debt for my car, etc.


Fortunately, the spammers seem not to know my habits, age, gender, capabilities, or my social and financial situation, and their claims are just profanation and bluff. Usually they demand a ransom for "not disclosing" a "confidential" information about me.


However, it is not a joke, and the large number of the emails of this type indicated ca.inter.net"s abusive policy.


Here is an example of such emails (it was sent from the same person and the same email

address several times due to spam filtering blockage in my email account):


Return-Path:

X-Original-To: leog@total.net

Delivered-To: leog@total.net

Received: from mp-mx10.ca.inter.net (host-208-85-217-18.static.295.ca [208.85.217.18])

(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))

(No client certificate requested)

by mail-1.ca.inter.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0BE4E2EA04C

for ;

Thu, 9 Jul 2020 22:37:06 -0400 (EDT)

Received: from mp-mx10.ca.inter.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])

by mp-mx10.ca.inter.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03F34140004

for ;

Thu, 9 Jul 2020 22:37:06 -0400 (EDT)

Received: from mp-mx10.ca.inter.net ([127.0.0.1])

by mp-mx10.ca.inter.net (mp-mx10.ca.inter.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)

with ESMTP id EyS4mXmJpttf for ;

Thu, 9 Jul 2020 22:37:05 -0400 (EDT)

X-Greylist: delayed 8010 seconds by postgrey-1.36 at mp-mx10.ca.inter.net;

Thu, 09 Jul 2020

22:37:05 EDT

Received: from alfaacoustic.com (alfaacoustic.com [194.58.120.228])

by mp-mx10.ca.inter.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C86D140003

for ;

Thu, 9 Jul 2020 22:37:05 -0400 (EDT)

Message-ID: <0e427ef80c9217defd03b5e6ed39024e6c9295a1ae@4credit.info>

From: Loyal Customer

To: Loyal Customer

Subject: Hi Loyal Customer, Someone have access to you computer.

Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2020 00:02:00 +0300

MIME-Version: 1.0

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii";

Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=4credit.info; s=mail;

c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1594328520;

h=message-id:from:to:subject:date:mime-version;

bh=05IZdXlbTbfNdej6Y8kZY8+gJvc/ZyBbjxgkCIF7m/4=;

b=oYcE5WC9VCxuRCeLJXB+P5Q4TaYoNF3r38P6Fu8KITd6F3RSbnGntDE0pWD9R

8

bdLG7SiOP7RZsYVTUdyamWosQQJcBCrhNovC/aIyjd9psRdxpMQHUZXvay5Enxl5

Jkz2YL9wm33Tchw1TH1gecBZ7L2EaVYyYD8wqMlfyc0tA=


Hi, dear Loyal Customer

We hve instlled one RT softwre into you device

For this moment your emil ccount is hcked too.

I know your pssword. I logged in to your ccount nd wrote this letter to y=

ou from there.

Chnged your pssword? You're doing gret!

But my softwre recognizes every such ction. I'm updting psswords!

I'm lwys one step hed....

So... I hve downloded ll confidentil informtion from your system nd I got=

some more evidence.

The most interesting moment tht I hve discovered re videos records where =

you msturbting.

I posted Spelevo Exploit modifiction on porn site, nd then you instlled m=

y mlicious code (trojn) on your opertion system.

When you clicked the button Ply on porn video, t tht moment my trojn ws d=

ownloded to your device.

fter instlltion, your front cmer shoots video every time you msturbte, in=

ddition, the softwre is synchronized with the video you choose.

For the moment, the softwre hs hrvrested ll your contct informtion from s=

ocil networks nd emil ddresses.

If you need to erse ll of your collected dt nd videos, send me $650 in BT=

C (crypto currency).

This is my Bitcoin wllet: 16dUrec9DMpvxa4cZzVmB5pb7KEbczMBxy

You hve 48 hours fter reding this letter.

fter your trnsction I will erse ll your dt.

Otherwise, I will send video with your sweepstkes to ll your collegues, =

friends nd reltives!!!

P.S. I sk you not to reply to this emil, this is impossible (the sender's=

ddress is your own ddress).

And henceforth be more careful!

Please visit only secure sites!

Bye,Bye...


...............


Do I have to tell you that I should not be exposed to receiving and reading this crap?

Do I have to tell you that the politically-motivated persecutions are a crime in Canada?

I demand an unconditional and uninterrupted restoration of my customer"s rights and

termination of your abusive policy.

Yours truly,

Lev (Leon) Gunin.

22 September 2020.


_______


1) Why all these problems (listed above) happened and happening, and who"s responsible for them?


2) Why my problems reports and demands were always ignored?


3) Why I am not allowed to use my Inter.net Canada"s service as it supposed to be?


4) Who is responsible for the permanent sabotage of the normal functions of my Inter.net Canada"s account?


5) Why my demands of compensation for all the inconveniences, dysfunctions, and sabotages were not even answered in 2008-2020?


6) Why my access to the spam filters is blocked, and who"s responsible?


7) Why my access to Inter.net Canada"s technical support is blocked?


8) Why my message (sent on 22 Sep. 2020) was ignored, and no one contacted me from Inter.net Canada?


9) Why the whole Inbox content have disappeared (21 September 2020), and who is responsible;

and why - when I am sending emails from my free web mailboxes to leog@total.net - they don"t

arrive; and why other people (with whom I am in a direct personal or phone contact) are sending

me emails, which did not arrive to leog@total.net after 21 Sep. 2020?


10) Why the content of my emails is filtered, and the messaged with a particular content are

blocked?


11) Why my disagreements with the practice of sending my personal information - in Inter.net

Canada"s bills - as an open source text (not as just a pdf attachment as before mid 2018) were

ignored, and this practice continues?


12) I demand an unconditional and immediate restoration of all the functions and functionalities

of my email account, and compensation for all inconveniences and consequences.


Yours truly,

Lev (Leon) Gunin.

2 October 2020.

.........................................

The proof that my complaint to Inter Net Canada was sent on 2 Oct. 2020:

.......................................


Inbox: [FIBERNETICS #1162401] AutoReply: Problems Report (3 of 3) PersonalUnseen

Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2020 19:22:15 -0400 [02/10/20 07:22:15 PM EDT]

From: leog@total.net via RT Canada

To: leog@total.net

Reply-To: customercomplaints@fibernetics.ca

Subject: [FIBERNETICS #1162401] AutoReply: Problems Report

Greetings,

This message has been automatically generated in response to the creation of a

trouble ticket regarding Problems Report.

There is no need to reply to this message right now. Your ticket has been

assigned an ID of [FIBERNETICS #1162401].

Please include the string [FIBERNETICS #1162401] in the subject line of all

future correspondence about this issue. To do so, you may reply to this

message.

Thank you,

customercomplaints@fibernetics.ca

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Multipart/alternative

Alternative parts for this section: Help

unnamed 1 KB

...................................


4.8. Was it a coincident: that a virus attack happened when I was accessing my email box

leog@total.net right next day (right after my complaint), or was it a punishment for my letter?

(See the screenshot below: 3 Oct. 2020):


On 5 Oct. 2020, only spam in the Inbox folder (the evidence that Inter Net Canada just ignored

my complaint):


However, the invoice (10 Oct. 2020) shows that my demands for compensation for disruption

and malfunctions of Inter Net Canada"s services were ignored as always during almost 20 years.


In spite of Inter Net Canada"s policy (and it"s claim on it"s web page) to respond in 48 hours,

my long letter was replied only on 15 Oct. 2020, when I was contacted from Inter Net Canada"s

call center by phone.


A technician spoke to me (I recorded this call), and confirmed that the spam filters are not working at the given moment.


We also discussed other issues.


Here (below) is a screenshot, which confirms that the spam filters are not working for me (16

Oct. 2020):


And here is the screenshot, which confirms that there no personal emails in the mailbox, just the

spam alone. This screenshot also displays 2 emails from 2 Inter Net Canada"s technicians, who

did not report any solutions to problems, which I reported to Inter Net Canada on 2 Oct. 2020

(see below):


[see the next page]


One of the emails from Inter Net Canada"s technicians was advising me to call personally to a

technician, whose extension was mentioned: 1-855-835-6381 Ext 203.


However, any calls from my phone number to this phone seemed to be disabled. (See below the email"s text).


Inbox: [INTER.NET #1169363] Problems Report (1 of 2) PersonalUnseen


Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2020 14:58:18 -0400 [15/10/20 02:58:18 PM EDT]

From: Stephen Hewlett via RT

To: leog@total.net

Reply-To: support@ca.inter.net

Subject: [INTER.NET #1169363] Problems Report


I talked to Leo and we are going to have a look at some of his concerns and

see what we can resolve.


Hi Leo as I said here is my information


Stephen Hewlett phone number 1-855-835-6381 Ext 203


As we discussed we are going to address your concerns one at a time and see

what we can accomplish .


--


Thank You

Stephen Hewlett

Technical Support

Level 3

Multipart/alternative

Alternative parts for this section: Help

unnamed 0 KB

...........................


Another email confirmed that the technician could not solve the problems, which I addressed to Inter Net Canada, on his level, and readdressed them to his supervisors (see below):


Inbox: [FIBERNETICS #1162401] Problems Report (2 of 2) PersonalUnseen


Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2020 09:35:51 -0400 [15/10/20 09:35:51 AM EDT]

From: Pierre Arseneault via RT Canada

To: leog@total.net

Reply-To: customercomplaints@fibernetics.ca

Subject: [FIBERNETICS #1162401] Problems Report


Dear Mr. Gunin,


It is frustrating to have technical issues.


I have escalate your situtation to our Senior Technical Support Team.


Someone will reach out with you shortly.


Pierre Arseneault

Customer Experience Coordinator

Multipart/alternative

Alternative parts for this section: Help

unnamed 0 KB

.....................


I sent a reply to these 2 emails (16 Oct. 2020):


Sent: Re: [FIBERNETICS #1162401] Problems Report (1 of 4)


Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2020 23:25:27 -0400 [11:25:27 PM EDT]

From: leog@total.net

To: customercomplaints@fibernetics.ca

Subject: Re: [FIBERNETICS #1162401] Problems Report


1 unnamed 1 KB


All problems remain:


1) I could not access my email-box


2 days, because the browser has

detected a danger.


2) Spam filters are not working - as before.


[see the attached image]


3) No personal emails. Spam alone.


[see the attached image]


My best regards,

Leon Gunin.


Quoting Pierre Arseneault via RT :


[Hide Quoted Text]


Dear Mr. Gunin,


It is frustrating to have technical issues.


I have escalate your situtation to our Senior Technical Support Team.


Someone will reach out with you shortly.


Pierre Arseneault

Customer Experience Coordinator


2 unnamed 0 KB


[Attachment stripped: Original attachment type: "image/jpeg", name: "Filters-Disabled-on-ca-inter-net--16-Oct-2020-.jpg"]


3 unnamed 0 KB


[Attachment stripped: Original attachment type: "image/jpeg", name: "No-personal-mails-spam-alone-on-ca-inter-net--16-Oct-2020-.jpg"]


.......................


Another technician, Stephen Hewlett, sent me a test (see his message below [15 Oct. 2020]):


Sent: Test from Stephen (3 of 4)


Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2020 13:36:46 -0400 [15/10/20 01:36:46 PM EDT]

From: leog@total.net

To: help@ca.inter.net

Subject: Test from Stephen

I am sending a test

..................


As we can see, the test did not come. It supposed to be an attachment, but there was no attachment. What can we say about my customer"s rights, if his (technician"s) own email was striped from the attachment?!


4.9. Meanwhile, the help submission web tool was blocked for me by Inter Net Canada, as it was before (see 2 screenshots below: 16 Oct. 2020):


Because my previous complaint email was stripped of 2 of 4 attached files, I repeated my reply

to emails sent by Inter Net Canada"s technicians by submitting the copy of the same message,

with all 4 attached files again (see below):


Sent: Re: [INTER.NET #1169363] Problems Report (1 of 1)


Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2020 23:34:36 -0400 [11:34:36 PM EDT]

From: leog@total.net

To: support@ca.inter.net

Cc: customercomplaints@fibernetics.ca

Subject: Re: [INTER.NET #1169363] Problems Report


1 unnamed 1 KB


All problems remain:


1) I could not access my email-box


2 days, because the browser has

detected a danger.


2) Spam filters are not working - as before.

[see the attached image]


3) No personal emails. Spam alone.

[see the attached image]


4) Help Blocked

[see 2 attached images]


My best regards,

Leon Gunin.


Quoting Stephen Hewlett via RT :


[Hide Quoted Text]


I talked to Leo and we are going to have a look at some of his concerns and

see what we can resolve.


Hi Leo as I said here is my information

Stephen Hewlett phone number 1-855-835-6381 Ext 203


As we discussed we are going to address your concerns one at a time and see

what we can accomplish .

--

Thank You

Stephen Hewlett

Technical Support

Level 3


2 unnamed 0 KB

[Attachment stripped: Original attachment type: "image/jpeg", name: "Filters-Disabled-on-ca-inter-net--16-Oct-2020-.jpg"]


3 unnamed 0 KB

[Attachment stripped: Original attachment type: "image/jpeg", name: "No-personal-mails-spam-alone-on-ca-inter-net--16-Oct-2020-.jpg"]


4 unnamed 0 KB

[Attachment stripped: Original attachment type: "image/jpeg", name: "Help-Blocked-on-ca-inter-net--16-Oct-2020a-.jpg"]


5 unnamed 0 KB

[Attachment stripped: Original attachment type: "image/jpeg", name: "Help-Blocked-on-ca-inter-net--16-Oct-2020b-.jpg"]


..........................


I had an impression that even Inter Net Canada"s technicians were astonished by my case, and outraged by their own helplessness, and wanted to help me, and, in the same time, to solve the mystery (why, in spite of all their efforts, all problems remained). I received a very friendly email from one of them (23 Oct. 2020) (see 2 emails below):


Inbox: [INTER.NET #1169363] Problems Report (6 of 7) PersonalUnseen


Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 07:55:09 -0400 [20/10/20 07:55:09 AM EDT]

From: Stephen Hewlett via RT

To: leog@total.net

Reply-To: support@ca.inter.net

Subject: [INTER.NET #1169363] Problems Report


Hi Leo so I will touch base with you today later in the day if that is ok with

you and we will see what we can address .


On 2020-10-16 22:51:26, leog@total.net wrote:


All problems remain:


1) I could not access my email-box

2 days, because the browser has

detected a danger.


2) Spam filters are not working - as before.

[see the attached image]


3) No personal emails. Spam alone.

[see the attached image]


4) Help Blocked

[see 2 attached images]


My best regards,

Leon Gunin.


Quoting Stephen Hewlett via RT :


> I talked to Leo and we are going to have a look at some of his concerns and

> see what we can resolve.

>

> Hi Leo as I said here is my information

> Stephen Hewlett phone number 1-855-835-6381 Ext 203

>

> As we discussed we are going to address your concerns one at a time and see

> what we can accomplish .

>

> --

> Thank You

>

> Stephen Hewlett

> Technical Support

> Level 3

>

>

--

Thank You

Stephen Hewlett

Technical Support

Level 3

Multipart/alternative

Alternative parts for this section: Help


unnamed 1 KB

...........................


[My comment: in spite of his promise, I never received any call from him; possibly, because my phone number was blocked from any connection with Inter Net Canada"s phone line. This

suggestion is based on the fact that my phone is obviously blocked from accessing Inter Net

Canada"s call center.]


And the 2-nd message, which reflects a very human approach (below):


Inbox: [INTER.NET #1169363] Problems Report (2 of 7) PersonalUnseen


Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 16:01:27 -0400 [23/10/20 04:01:27 PM EDT]

From: Stephen Hewlett via RT

To: leog@total.net

Reply-To: support@ca.inter.net

Subject: [INTER.NET #1169363] Problems Report


Hi Leo I have not forgotten you I will back around on Monday to dig into your questions

--

Thank You

Stephen Hewlett

Technical Support

Level 3

Multipart/alternative

Alternative parts for this section: Help


unnamed 0 KB

...........................


However, all their efforts were in vein, and the same problems were still there.


4.9. Another email from Inter Net"s Technical support came on 2 Nov. 2020:

Inbox: [INTER.NET #1169363] Problems Report (41 of 46) PersonalUnseen


Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2020 08:31:34 -0500 [02/11/20 08:31:34 AM EST]

From: Stephen Hewlett via RT

To: leog@total.net

Reply-To: support@ca.inter.net

Subject: [INTER.NET #1169363] Problems Report


Hey Leo I am just checking in to see if you have made any headway. Sorry I

have not called but I have been testing your from this side.

--

Thank You

Stephen Hewlett

Technical Support

Level 3

Multipart/alternative

Alternative parts for this section: Help


unnamed 0 KB

..................


This is the confirmation that he did not call indeed (and, I repeat, it possible that he could not contact me because, perhaps, my phone number was blocked from any connection with Inter Net Canada"s phone line. This suggestion is based on the fact that my phone is obviously blocked from accessing Inter Net Canada"s call center.


I tried to send a reply with my appreciation of Mr. Hewlett"s and Mr. Arseneault"s human approach, but since November 3, 2020 (my birthday!) I had problems with accessing the email service in general (most of the time), and, besides, was not able to send any messages to Inter Net Canada"s help center via email, or through the web form.


This has an indirect confirmation by the next email:


Inbox: [INTER.NET #1169363] Problems Report (3 of 4) PersonalUnseen


Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2020 08:32:05 -0500 [05/11/20 08:32:05 AM EST]

From: Stephen Hewlett via RT

To: leog@total.net

Cc: leog@total.net

Reply-To: support@ca.inter.net

Subject: [INTER.NET #1169363] Problems Report


Hi Leo I am trying to get some information to help you but not sure you are

getting my emails as we had discussed on the phone.

--

Thank You

Stephen Hewlett

Technical Support

Level 3

Multipart/alternative

Alternative parts for this section: Help


unnamed 0 KB

.......................


Here is the confirmation that my access to Inter Net Canada"s webmail service was blocked: see the screenshots (11 Nov. 2020):


13 Nov. 2020 I tried to send the next message (see the screenshot below):


I could do it just on the 13-th attempt:


As I explained in my previous complains, I am not receiving personal e-mails to my inter.net Canada account leog@total.net for a long period of time, but Sunday, November 8, 2020, 1 e-mail arrived to my email box.


However, when I clicked on it to open in a new window and to read, this email immediately disappeared. Since then (Since Nov. 8) I could not access my inter.net Canada"s account at all: a security risk message appears, and, when I click on the button of accepting the security risk, it takes me nowhere.


Everything is telling that my account is frozen, and I demand: WHY. It is not only my customer"s and citizen"s right to know, why my account is frozen, but my right even according to the International Law.

Your truly,

Lev Gunin,

13 November, 2020.

.....................


Interestingly, the automatic confirmation, generated by Inter Net Canada"s robot, deleted the text of my original message, contrary to the norm (see below):


Inbox: [FIBERNETICS #1190518] AutoReply: From your customer (54 of 54) PersonalUnseen


Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2020 21:05:47 -0500 [13/11/20 09:05:47 PM EST]

From: leog@total.net via RT Canada

To: leog@total.net

Reply-To: customercomplaints@fibernetics.ca

Subject: [FIBERNETICS #1190518] AutoReply: From your customer


Greetings,


This message has been automatically generated in response to the creation of a

trouble ticket regarding From your customer.


There is no need to reply to this message right now. Your ticket has been

assigned an ID of [FIBERNETICS #1190518].


Please include the string [FIBERNETICS #1190518] in the subject line of all

future correspondence about this issue. To do so, you may reply to this

message.


Thank you,

customercomplaints@fibernetics.ca

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Multipart/alternative

Alternative parts for this section: Help


unnamed 1 KB

....................


Till the end of November, 2020, no personal emails arrived to my mailbox, just spam. It was

like not spam was filtered and kept away, but, on the contrary: my personal emails (20 Nov.

2020):


Also - the outgoing emails were blocked as well:


In this situation, the most natural, central and logical question is why now, in the end of 2020, when I have a reliable and never-interrupted Internet with another Internet-provider, and when several of Inter Net Canada"s technical workers obviously sincerely wanted to give me a helping hand, and to terminate the problems I am experiencing - why all the problems are still here, and the email service in reality is actually frozen for me?


And who is responsible for this?


5.1. In January, 2021, all problems are still there, and here (below) is the evidence that non of

the previous issues was solved, and that my webmail account is de facto frozen by Inter Net

Canada.


a) Abracadabra again (decoding malfunctioning) for non-English letters" characters, and also -

just spam alone, no personal emails, as before (see the screenshot):


b) To prove that my browser is an appropriate and updated version, I did an additional

screenshot:


c) Filters for spam are disabled, as before:


d) I tried to access the problem report option from the webmail, but it was blocked for me, as

before:


e) I tried to access the problem report form from the general account at Inter Net Canada. First of all, the login-password entering required 3 attempts, because both entered into the corresponding fields login and password were erased (disappeared) each time (see below):


When, finally, I could log in the account, only the button "profile" worked, and other buttons (the "door" to the problem report form) did not function for me:


(for security reason, the confidential information is masked)


f) When I opened the Inbox folder, there was spam alone, no personal emails:


[see the next page]


Most of the spam was sent from the same 2 addresses:


However, both of these addresses were entered into to spam filters years before (see: suscribe@iz.ru and delivery@24tv.ua):


This is the evidence that the spam filters are disabled for me.


When I clicked on the button "spam settings", all entered addresses were set to "deny": (unfortunately, the time indication hide at this moment).


However, as soon as I entered the new address (even before I clicked on the button "add

address"), a number of upper "denies" have been automatically changed to "allow":


Who is responsible for all these problems with the webmail service? Who actually frozen my

webmail account with Inter Net Canada?


I would like to know the answers.


GENERAL PART 4:

The medical crimes are described in a separate work, which has thousands of pages with text and images. This well-documented report on medical crimes can be sent on request in English. A non-complete Russian version was published online in 2017-2018 on several web sites, for example, here:


http://www.balandin.net/Gunin/Pdf/criminal-healthcare-a-en.htm


GENERAL PART 6:

Violations of my voter"s rights (removal from voters" lists in the provincial elections).

In October, 2019, I was infected by an unknown virus after eating the infected grapes. By then, I did not know about Covid-19 (nobody knew), but, since the beginning of the pandemic, there are more and more facts and symptoms resemblances, which point to Covid.


On the day of Quebec"s provincial elections, I was still sick, but, putting an improvised mask on my face, I went to the former St. Charles Church, to vote.


When I came, I was approached by a man, who told me to remove the mask (the question of identification).


Every year the election-related papers used to be delivered to me and my wife by mail (we live at the same address more than 15 years). However, this time we received nothing. That"s why I asked my younger daughter to register us online (I was still too ill to do it myself). She registered us online, and received a confirmation.


However, when I came to the voting site, me and my wife - we were not allowed to vote, which is described in my next letter to Quebec Election Committee (see below: in French):

...........................................

Gunin, Lev - [leog@total.net]


Je demande l'enquête au sujet de la violation de nos droits électoraux, et de la non-réception par nous des bulletins de vote. C'est arrivé pour la première fois depuis 2004. Nous vivons à cette adresse dès 2005, et, alors, une faute typique en rapport le déménagement est exclue.


Quand nous n'avons pas reçu (par la poste) les bulletins de vote, ma fille cadette nous enregistré en ligne, mais (comme plus tard s'est révélé) mon nom n"a pas apporté en tout cas aux listes électorales.

Lundi, le 21 octobre 2019, moi et ma femme - nous sommes venus sur le bureau de vote de la Pointe St. Charles.


J'avais une grippe grave, et on mettait l'oreille, par qui je n'entendais rien, plus, j"avais un masque sur le visage augmentant les inconvénients, et, malgré cela, je parti pour voter.


Cependant, malgré cela, nous n'avons pas pu voter.


Quand nous sommes venus, ont nous dirigé incorrectement non sur l'enregistrement, mais vers la table de la procédure du vote. Il y avait là une longue ligne, et nous avons perdu pas moins que le demi-heure.


(Y compris l'éclaircissement au sujet de l'absence de nos noms dans la liste.)


Nous sommes revenus de nouveau à la première table à côté de l'entrée, et seulement alors étaient dirigés sur l'enregistrement.


Mais pourquoi il ne se trouva pas mon nom dans les listes, malgré que ma fille cadette m'a enregistré en ligne ?


Ici il fallut attendre de nouveau au tour, mais un autre volontaire m'a appelé vers l'angle de la table, comme pour accélérer l'enregistrement (ma femme restait dans la ligne). Cependant, ce volontaire a éclairci seulement que je ne suis pas enregistré en effet dans la liste, а, entre-temps,

l"enregistreuse a appelé non ma femme, mais les gens, qui se sont approchés tout à l'heure.


D'autres hommes nouveaux ensuite s'approchaient, et tous été invitaient avant nous.


Ma femme ne souhaitait pas plus attendre, et a dit que, une fois ainsi, elle part. En outre - elle avait une importante action avec nos filles, et elle était déjà en retard. Moi-même, je pour ce moment-là déjà me tenais debout à peine. Je presque n'entendais rien, et ne pouvait pas rester sans ma femme.

Donc, nous sommes partis, n'ayant pas reçu la possibilité de voter.


Ainsi, c'est non une "erreur" isolée, mais une série entière des erreurs graduelles liées.


Le 24 octobre 2019.

.......................


I have composed this letter in a hurry.


Moreover, my written French is not as good as English, and, to avoid mistakes, I must devote much more time.


However, with all the mistakes, my letter is understandable.


Still, I received no reply.


-----------


* * *


Medical crimes - as a logical extension of other repressive, anti-subversive, oppressive, and suppressive methods (automatically generated by the profiling-oriented system even without someone's malicious intentions) - have destroyed my health: my last fortress and refuge. Being attacked by "strangers", poisoned, hit by cars, or subjected to other traumatic events, I was denied medical help, and was kicked out from emergency rooms without any prescription, recommendation, and follow-ups. In the same time, many of my tests' results have been altered, or disappeared, or were incomplete. Such events provoked multiple complications, which made my life even more miserable.


Because the right to receive medical help is one of the most essential human rights, the "cancellation" of this right (the destruction of the public health-care system by the ruling elites) must be regarded as a part of the systemic obliteration of human rights, living standards, and social guaranties by the new neo-feudal oligarchy. It is extremely significant that the obliteration of the access to medical care is accompanied by the actual elimination of the right for an old-age pension and retirement.


The retirement age was revised several times during last 30 years, and the ruling neo-feudal elites have extended the retirement age from 55-60 years-old (depending from country) census - up to 65-70 years-old age (depending on country).


While the life-expectancy is degrading everywhere (in the 1980-1990-s the average lifetime was 10-15 years longer than today), and the old-age citizens become one and all (without exception) sick and chronically tired, this forcible labor for the old-age low-paid citizens is equal to the old-age population's genocide.


Today, people around 70 years-old are near their death, so, the governments force them to work hard up to one's last breath. This is not only the denial (for people) of the right to rest last 5-7 years of life in peace and in dignity; not only the infliction of the never-ended vicious torture (because, regarding today's extensive exploitation; corruption of work safety standards; so-called "health-care "crisis"; and the further poisoning of the environment - hard workers become infirm, sick, feeble, and sickly much faster than 15-30 years ago, and the forcible labor for people after 60 is an obvious torture); not only a broad-day robbery (because the workers, who work their whole life for the benefits of the society (and, most of all, for the enrichment of the rich), accumulating public goods - have earned enough for being supported by the state during the last years of their life; but, first of all, the return to the slavery, because slaves have no pension! And the fact that the richest countries in the world (like Britain and France) are cutting the old-age pension plan: is the most outraged.


All "excuses" like a theory of the "labor force deficit", or "the aging population" problem: are a blatant lie, because the ruling class could mechanize and robotize the production of good - and even some of the services 50 years ago already; to boost the birth rate; and to take other measures, if THIS was a problem. But, in reality, their real goal is their own domination as modern "gods", and the transformation of the population into the powerless (deprived of civil rights) mass of slaves, subjected to the absolute obedience.


However, even this is not "enough" for the ruling elite. They want to transform the medical care into a kind of prisons and concentration camps replacement: into a punitive and genocidal tool. And the documented materials of my further statements about my personal experience are serving as a proof that such plans exist.


In this testimony, I am not just describing the unfortunate events, but I support my story by real medical documents and other factual data, which base my statements on an iron proof.


Now, I should add 3 very important remarks.


While nasty persecutions targeted me, they caused a traumatic impact on my family members and left deep psychological scars, destroyed family's socioeconomic status, etc. All crimes that made me a victim also victimized my close ones.


The majority of medical doctors, and other medical professionals, whom I met, were nice people, and adequately completed their work. Some of them even risked their own medical career by offering me more attention or help than was foreseen by the formalities, or by disobeying the orders "from above". Medical professionals saved me from very dramatic outcomes and their gruesome consequences. Unfortunately, their heroic efforts and generosity were destroyed by their fewer dishonest colleagues, who, in turn, worked hard to ruin my health, and by the System, which squeezed me between its vices.


While I am unlucky to face these unfortunate events, I am lucky enough to be in Canada, where the System is a bit softer than in many of other states. In many of other countries [in the Northern Hemisphere] (even in some of best European states) my fate could be even gloomier.


In spite of all my criticism and complains, objectively, Canada is still an island of a bit more human atmosphere in the middle of the ocean of growing global cruelty and elimination of former humanitarian principles.


---


Since 3 Nov. 2022, the general pressure, a wave of provocations, and police intimidations: everything returned altogether.


Since 3 Nov. 2022, Ca-inter-net restricted my access to my emails or to my mailbox in general; disconnected me from online, emails, and telephone customers' support; blocked (again) the spam filters; and made my communications in European languages impossible by wrongly displaying the printed characters of German, French, Polish, Russian, Byelorussian, and Ukrainian letters. Chinese and Arab characters also appear in my browsers incorrectly, not allowing me to know a nature of spam (and other) messages that sometimes I receive in these languages. When I dial the telephone number, which is displayed on ca-inter-net's web page (855-440-1444), I get a message that this is a wrong number (see below):


When I am trying to send an email to customercomplaints@ca.inter.net, or to send a complaint via their webpage online form, my messages are always blocked.


Since abandoning ca-inter-net, and switching to another Telephone-Internet provider, I did not have any problems during 7 years (like systematic disconnections of my phone line and Internet (sometimes for weeks!); intolerantly slow Internet speed; vicious computer viruses' attacks directed from ca-inter-net server; sabotage of my emails; etc.), but - since the day of my birthday - some problems have started to accumulate again. In last 5 months, Telephone-Internet was down 3 times for 5-6 hours. The ID-caller stopped working. I am cut off the International lines, and not able to call my relatives in Germany and Poland. However, the isolation from the distant calls' network could happen on a higher level than our Telephone-Internet provider.


The last is confirmed by the fact that the ominous company Rogers (not less ominous than Bell), which becomes in Canada the same monopolist as Bell, is going to buy the local Quebec company Videotrone, which services we use. The problems with our Internet and phone began then when the first messages about Rogers' intention began to surface. Problems started also with other services, which also foreign firms intend to buy. It means that - while we used the services of the local Quebec companies - everything was as it should be, and - for 7 years - we were freed from the spiteful mockery, but - as soon as we got into hands of foreign firms (or non-Quebec Canadian companies), the former politically motivated prosecutions at once restarted.


This fact, in turn, confirms all my former guesses (about the one, whom exactly I have to "thank" for the fact that my life was broken and that I am exposed to the ceaseless abuse and scoff), which I hinted in this extensive chronicle.


It is not a coincidence that - simultaneously with the disconnection of the display ID-caller function - a malicious campaign of systematic anonymous calls has restarted after 5-6 years of calm. Since November 3, 2022 (my birthday!), I receive 3-4 or 5-6 anonymous calls per day, not being able to see the phone number of the caller. Obviously, one of the most probable goals of the callers is to knock me out of balance (to play on my nerves), but these systematic anonymous calls can also serve a purpose of verification if I am at home; of an analysis of my mood, physical and psychological condition; etc. (?). They can simply check my hearing and reacting capabilities for possible future provocations; or collect samples of my - allegedly - "inadequate" responses or reactions (skillfully setting up special particular situations for staged replies): for a future smear campaign. For example, 13 Apr. 2023, a young Brute has played a role of a vendor - who is calling about a delivery of some mattresses, while distorting his voice by noises, signals, and music: clearly mocking at me and hiding his scoffing sneer. A functional ID-caller would give some general ideas about this months-long provocation, but it was shut down by the Internet-Telephone provider. I called few times; my daughter called them; they promised to call back - and NEVER called back.


After 3 years of calm (when home intrusions used to happen very rarely [I mean illegal searched in our absence at home]), unlawful possible intrusions into my apartment have also intensified, sending scary and intimidating signals.


When my family doctor retired, an access to medical care was almost completely blocked for me in general. The government cynically used Covid pandemic for blocking an access not only for people like me, but for 15-20 percent of population as well, planning to get rid of conscious objectors and of so-called "social ballast". Using Covid pandemic as a pretext, the ruling elite introduced a policy of the pre-registered appointment for any laboratory test, which made possible to a) cut a considerable part of population from timely and necessary laboratory tests, and b) to redevelop methods of lab tests' sabotage so that now it is entirely government's affair: to release an objective true medical data, or to destroy any of genuine medical exam.


As the government established an online policy for any medical appointment, it is becoming harder and harder to book an appointment by a telephone call, and a number of opportunities to see just ANY doctor have shrink almost down to "0".


And because my access to medical (private and governmental) websites is constantly sabotaged, not only an appointment with a doctor, but also an appointment for a blood-urine test is becoming a hardship.


Most of the time an access to Canadian (and Quebec) medical web sites is blocked for me (for additional information see book 8 of this chronicle: "Police Intimidation and Digital Terror" [(3) Systemic sabotage of phone line, Internet-access, and email services; innumerous disconnections of Internet and phone. Blockage of medical, educational, and other web sites. [Internet-Emails Sabotage 1997-2021.]).


For weeks (and, sometimes, for 1-2 months) I am disconnected from the most essential Quebec-Canadian web resources, not been able to access my laboratory tests, to book a medical appointment, or to book an appointment for a blood-urine test. I am using the updated and adequate web browsers, and there should be no problems with browsing and accessing the web resources from the technical point of view. There no problems with my computer systems, or with anything else that would limit or restrict my access to medical web sites. My browsers' configuration is common, like browsers of other Internet-users. Thus, my difficulties could be explained exclusively by politically-motivated persecutions, especially that there are also some indirect indications of this. For example, when, in April 2023, I accessed the mapquest website, it displayed the view of my last request back in 2015: a part of Glen site environments' map. However, since after 2015, I have another computer, another modem, another Internet-provider, another IP-address, and so on. There are no any non-system (personal) files in my "net" computer; no anything that could expose my identity. There are no cookies or cash files, which would be left after accessing web pages with my personal data; no passwords: nothing that could betray my identity to web sites. Besides, I am sitting behind a rooter wall, and my "net" computer is connected to the rooter and the modem by a wired connection, which does not allow intruders to see wireless avatars of other Internet-users around me, and, consequently, to calculate my exact location, my exact address, and my exact identity. Until Rogers' intentions to buy Videotrone, web sites like webquest could not crack my identity; the caller-ID function was not disconnected from my phone line; my phone-Internet connection never suffered from frequent disconnections (as before 2016); and I had NO problems with my current Internet provider.


During 2016 - 3 November 2022 period, I had only once a problem with my present Internet-provider, and, after my report of the problem, they immediately intervened, and the problem was operationally solved in hours. NOW I and my daughter - we contacted my Internet-phone provider few times, reporting multiple problems (from disconnection of the caller-ID function, to frequent disconnection from educational and medical web resources), but they never called back.


I believe that my access to Quebec-Canadian web resources is blocked on both levels: on the level of the medical web sites, and on the level of the technical facilities, which stay higher than my Internet-provider. See below:


Not only my access is systematically blocked, but the data of my laboratory tests and other exams is systematically illegally delayed, blocked, or destroyed.


For example, in the beginning of January 2023, Dr. Poliquin administrated a blood and immune test, signing a corresponding requisition. However, only in March 2023 I managed to get an appointment for these tests.


Till mid-April, I either could not access my medical file online in general, or the data on ALL laboratory tests was blocked altogether: the icon for the lab tests was simply "missing"! Normally, there are must by 5 icons: Rendez-vous; Médicament; Imagerie médicale; Services médicaux; Prélèvement; but - till mid-April - the 5-th icon was just removed for me! (See below):


When, finally, I was allowed to access the Prélèvement link-index (the beginning of April 2023), these 2 tests on the same requisition (done in March 2023) were still unavailable. Only in mid-April the blood-test report appeared in my medical chart, but the immune test was always missing. The message was saying that the immune test must become accessible before the 13 of April 2023, but - in the end of April, - my access to this test was still blocked (see below):


Besides, the government's web site illegally compromised my personal email address, displaying it without my consent. I never entered my email address online into any of medical web pages.


When the governmental web site was blocking all my tests altogether by removing the icon-link of Prelevement (it appeared only on 12 Apr. 2023), I called to book a rendezvous with Dr. Poliquin (11 Apr. 2023). Verdun Hospital's attendant tried to help me, but, first, the telephone reception was unacceptably bad; another person's voice (a female voice) frequently interrupted our conversation; there was noise-)clicking on the line; and for my already declined hearing it was an atrocity; and, thus, I could not communicate normally with the man, who answered my call. Secondly, he advised me to book an appointment with Dr. Poliquin, and to ask the doctor directly to make the immune test's copies available for me. However, this advice violated any logic, because it is a nonsense to advice someone, who is calling the right phone to book an appointment, to book an appointment! I told from the very beginning of the conversation that I need an appointment with Dr. Poliquin, and, in the end of our conversation (seconds before disconnecting), this person "advising" me to get an appointment!


I cannot explain that, and, consequently, I am not going to blame the person, who spoke with me, but one thing is abundantly clear: is that all (and any) medical appointments are presently blocked for me by the government. For example, before his retirement, Dr. Rohan told me that he is arranging my appointment with a surgeon (concerning a lesion on my neck), but 5 months later nobody contacted me (and, I am afraid: will never contact). My appointments with a urologist, and with other doctors - are blocked altogether.


[10 minutes after writing about the inaccessibility of my appointment with the surgeon, I received a call from his office, and got an appointment on the next day. I don't believe in such "coincidences". In this chronicle, I presented dozens of similar examples, which suggest that not only my telephone conversations are tapped, but that everything that I am typing on the computer is registered and becomes known to those spies. There are few ways to know - what someone in typing on a computer, which never goes online: from spy-cameras' clandestine installation - to reading and decoding the electromagnetic oscillations in the electric circuit, or recording the keyboard noises and decoding them into a digital text.]


In my old age, and in my health situation - totally cutting an access to medical help is the same as an assassination attempt.


This is the sad reality that we all are facing, but people like me are in a worse situation than anybody else.


____________


edited - 2023


___________